E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

On the use of pairs of dogs@@@@to highlight the name of the species

Community and Forum → Discussions on the website functionality → On the use of pairs of dogs@@@@to highlight the name of the species

Peter Khramov, 27.10.2013 2:50

So if you use in a comment such construction species name then you give a link on the very species description page on the website (in case the species is catalogued), in this case it will properly linked as Danaus plexippus, or if there's no yet such species in the catalogue, the name will appear in italic font. It's really handy and I suggest to use it often. There's also some specifics, if there are three comments on the page and they all contain such construction, this looks bad and reads even worse. So let's agree that we use this species name construction in the first comment and then just plain species name, no any @. Exception: when there's a huge discussion with lots of comments, there's some sense in using again this construction some time after as the first link goes down deep. All this about the situation when we talk about one species. If many different species mentioned, then many constructions could be used, even close to each other :--)

All the rest posts on: for your information, new features

Comments

27.10.2014 10:45, Shamil Murtazin

Peter, on the "dogs". It may need to add the button while writing a comment? ..
More to do a tooltip when you hover over the button that explains the syntax and rules for the use of tags. As before in the html tag was acronym.

27.10.2014 10:54, Peter Khramov

Shamil thought right. Did.

15.04.2015 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Peter, look at "dog" does not work if the comments written in the "Comment author" ?
Attend to please if you can: and there is need to link the type of lead. For example if you need to view photos compare with other closely related species.

15.04.2015 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov

Compare related species, I think better in a box on the page type, it is called "Properties appearance and differences from similar species" and then species of the same genus are always right. :)

15.04.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, it concerns the field of "Additional information / remarks.For example, instance,derived from the pupa or Determination was conducted on the picture or any other additional information: ", or simply " Comment author ")))
This field is free author fill or not, at its discretion:it is the author's original and edited without a time limit by the author himself and no one else but him can not do that.
And in this case one can not / does not have the right to put the author is no framework, except that the information must be specific photos or a butterfly species that is depicted in this photo.I think that the opportunity to provide a link to the form using "dog" must be there and did not see anything untoward. Sometimes you need in certain cases if the author himself wants to emphasize in this field focus on another form / forms for your convenience only.

15.04.2015 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov

Yes, there are rules in the social networks, in a particular niche sites, that's not good.

15.04.2015 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Dictate to the author, he wrote in his, Copyright (Understand personal) comments and what not to write, too, is not correct (it is bad form). The subjects of this field is devoted to butterflies: ie It is consistent with the main theme of the site. Do not equate with social networks are different things.

16.04.2015 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov

Basil, we have different concepts of bad taste. You refutes himself, if everyone would write that though (no matter where) is a mess, the author can not dictate (no matter where), that he was to write and what not to write. On the website it should be regulated. Since this is not spelled out, the last instance administrator.Generally any lyrics, and if it is a lot of the time, can turn any website into a kind of social network where all write what they want and no one or anyone or anything not specified. Here (on the site) a lot of the lyrics, and it comes from one particular moderator. :)))

16.04.2015 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, I repeat no lyrics. This field has just pronounced the rules: "Any other additional information" that is, This is clearly spelled out in it, and yet again focuses attention on this.De jure, the information in this field is not the property of the site, as well as a picture that is located under the property of the author who posted this photo and have the right to comment on it without going beyond the general rules of the site (a site about butterflies).We can only, in this case ask the author there is something to fix or fit to something that does not correspond to the subject of other fields, and nothing more. And like it to someone in person or not is irrelevant.Generally offtopic went (out from the subject): she is devoted destination fields on the site and is devoted to the "dogs" to select the type and they are made on site for convenience and nothing more. So I asked Peter to do the dog, and in this field, so they can be applied in the right way.

16.04.2015 12:50, Peter Khramov

Dogs are rarely required, but it can sometimes be useful, so why not. It will be time to make a dog.
And about the fact that the author of this field is the king and god - it is not. Yes, in this field more assumptions, but when it comes infa which obviously applies to other fields or no other pages - it can then be edited.And not only the author (we the authors, is, for six months does not appear on the site).

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.