Insecta.pro → Catalog Gallery Taxonomy References Maps Community More

Changing the color of pictures

Community and Forum → Questions about image uploading and editing on the website → Changing the color of pictures

Vladimir Bryukhov, 23.08.2014 8:33

Hello!
When loading Xanthia togata three shots in two (# 32834 and # 32832) to change the brightness, contrast, and the third (# 32836) Download as you are.
What is the reason?

Comments

23.08.2014 9:28, Evgeny Komarov

Vladimir! For fun, you looked uploaded photos. I have a feeling that all three pictures the brightness / contrast is absolutely identical. By the way the pictures are very good. Of course I do not see your original photos.

23.08.2014 10:10, Vladimir Bryukhov

Eugene could question the monitor? I have their pictures on TN matrixes do not perceive. The first two loaded (above mentioned) images fail brightness-contrast still quite noticeable. A copy of the original such as # 32836. Hence, the question arose. If this had happened in compression saytovskim engine, then change to photo # 32836.

23.08.2014 10:38, Shamil Murtazin

Vladimir, and you have them in what looked to this? .. If laytrum or other RAW-converters - they use their cunning profiles.

23.08.2014 13:46, Vladimir Bryukhov

Shamil, but what have the viewer? I say that all 3 copies of the image I see myself at the same brightness, contrast, and then download the complete gallery of two of the three losing brightness, contrast.
Can remove them and try to download the new? But I fear that more will turn any hemorrhoid.

23.08.2014 13:49, Peter Khramov

The difference between the images is, I confirm. Not very much, but what I said Vladimir seems to see (the first two more faded / withered / low contrast). The reasons are not clear to me, I'll check.

29.08.2014 12:29, Shamil Murtazin

Peter, can and sharpening the moment you look? .. :) Loading 32956, 32957. Clearly distinguish the scales on the wings. Actually, this is the main problem when shooting straightened copies. And then somehow all in a lather.
(32956 in the right half of the butterfly Rasfokus, so there it is ok)
Maybe it's not a very high quality compression of images the script? .. Or jpeg compression is high ...

30.08.2014 1:03, Peter Khramov

Compression is not high, but the scripts are too tight and the truth is worse than Photoshop with the correct settings. To maintain the highest quality (if you are sure that it is the quality of the original available) is shipping foty inscribed in 1024x768 (ie1024 in width or 768 in height depending of type of which party before goes beyond that), then the script will not reduce Fautua to maximize, and will only be in a restore Zhpeg (though it makes it worse Photoshop). Sometimes the topic about better options, but have so far.

09.09.2014 8:25, Boris Loboda

Looked # 32834 - where the color space CMYK.

09.09.2014 9:25, Yuri Semejkin

And what is the question? Translate to RGB

09.09.2014 9:59, Boris Loboda

>>> And what is the question? Translate to RGB
? It's me or something. I just explained the situation, why the pictures are pale. Why did you decide that I have the wrong picture on something there to translate.

09.09.2014 21:35, Vladimir Bryukhov

Re: Looked # 32834 - where the color space CMYK.
Do not understand. Where there is CMYK? If I keep this image at home and open in Photoshop, it shows the RGB.

10.09.2014 0:27, Yuri Semejkin

Vladimir! This color space (CMYK) can appear only in one case. If you worked there, and saved the file, not coming out of this space.

10.09.2014 0:37, Yuri Semejkin

Ps. Copied # 32834: Xanthia togata and opened in Photoshop. The file is saved in the color space RGB.
Ie no CMYK there.

19.09.2015 16:34, Ivan Tislenko

"To maintain the highest quality (if you are sure that it is the quality of the original available) is shipping foty inscribed in 1024x768" - it would be good to register in the section "Upload photos". Loads your photos and 1200x800 just noticed the loss of detail.

This is contrary to http: // insecta.pro / ru / terms:
Technical wishes to snapshots
Recommended size zagruzhyemyh photos - 1280 on the larger side.

19.09.2015 16:39, Peter Khramov

Now this infa outdated and need to enter in 1280x800. The section write.

19.09.2015 17:28, Ivan Tislenko

Upload a photo 1200x800. When open it online https://insecta.pro/images/1024/43503.jpg and save to your computer, its resolution 1152h768

19.09.2015 17:54, Ivan Tislenko

It appears that when loading squeezed up to 768 vertical pixels. In the gallery among the latest uploaded photos found with the vertical resolution over 768.

19.09.2015 21:12, Peter Khramov

Excuse me, I lied.
Now here is the limitation is: 1280x768.
At the same time, until recently, it was different for photons, which are loaded one by one and that Georgia Archive. Now all the same.
I think it is not necessary to do more (when viewed on a FullHD in the browser is not very cluttered quite logical limitation).If there are other opinions - reported.

19.09.2015 21:33, Ivan Tislenko

Maybe all the same to 800 pixels vertically to increase? I have hundreds of photos posted on makroklube basically the size of 1200x800 - thought leisurely upload them here without further processing. Well, if not, it will be cut.

19.09.2015 21:45, Peter Khramov

Did 800. Download now see. Just keep in mind that if the screen is not intermeddle phot, by increasing the site it will not be displayed 100% and less.

19.09.2015 21:59, Ivan Tislenko

Thank you! All work - mohnatka Download to 1200x800 native resolution https://insecta.pro/gallery/43519

20.09.2015 23:31, Peter Khramov

Ok, leave is of a size restriction.

21.09.2015 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Peter, height-would be more necessary.
This is necessary to accommodate the large photo collection specimens of beetles, for example.
In most of these cases, the most appropriate vertical shot.

14.11.2015 21:23, Igal Oz

I did not understand, what is now the optimal size for uploading photos :( if 1200x800 is horizontal? And if the vertical or square, how much, and 800H533 800x800?

14.11.2015 21:38, Peter Khramov

Igor, if you want the photo is not scaled on the site (a large amount), it is necessary to enter into a rectangle 1280x800. Fit - it does not mean that it should be exactly 1280x800 or that it should be horizontal. This means that it must not be greater than 1280 in width and not more than 800 adjustment. For example, it may be:
1280h666,
500h800,
680h580,
1000h740.
But.If Fautua download, for example, or 1280h801 1281h500, it will be proportionally scaled so that its width is less than 1280, and height - 800 pixels. At the same time the picture quality may deteriorate (program on the website scales more stupid than Photoshop with the correct settings).

14.11.2015 22:09, Igal Oz

Thank you. Clear. I want to support this exciting project and will start gradually ship photos of species that are not found on the site :)

14.11.2015 22:21, Peter Khramov

Excellent! Please send us your pictures!

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

News

09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration