All comments on Insecta.pro, except for the technical ones

Community and Forum → All comments feed
All the latest comments on topics, photos and species on the site in reverse chronological order.
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.

Pages: 1 ...136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144... 154

11.02.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5068

To go.

11.02.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5033

Photo moved.

11.02.2011 14:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5062

Shot moved.

11.02.2011 14:36, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5489

Moved then.

11.02.2011 13:17, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5008

Photo goes to P. goeldii.

11.02.2011 9:30, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Satyrium spini

View transferred from generation to generation Satyrium Nordmannia.

11.02.2011 9:28, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Satyrium esculi

View transferred from generation to generation Satyrium Nordmannia.

11.02.2011 9:21, : comment on Satyrium acaciae

View transferred from generation to generation Satyrium Nordmannia.

10.02.2011 23:39, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #4640

Not clearly seen, so it has "uncertain" status...

10.02.2011 23:38, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #1543

There we can see antennas from outside are slightly colored red. Anyway, Vlad saw more (shooting or even catching), if identified it like this. ;)

10.02.2011 23:35, Eugene Karolinskiy: comment on photo #2077

Just for the record: what should be considered that is butterfly's antennas from outside (even though usually it's hardly seen just the smallest part at the end of an antenna). Lineola has dark ones, sylvestris does red. And the moustache is colored more or less similarly, males have red or something like, females do dark. Also, males can be easily identified by stigmas.

10.02.2011 23:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4966

Ok, synonym added then. Meant, this... God, genetic combination.

10.02.2011 22:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4965

Moved to P. phyllides.

10.02.2011 21:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5449

Uh-oh... I'm dummie. Moving.

10.02.2011 18:56, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5529

Boris, thanks for approving. Photo moved.

10.02.2011 17:13, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5051

Shot goes.

10.02.2011 17:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5015

Ok, if male, so male...

10.02.2011 17:12, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4989

Moved then.

10.02.2011 17:11, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4971

Moved.

10.02.2011 17:10, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5024

Ok, moved. Dear approving gentlemen, please, approve also the very identifying, if it's successful, right after species, for me to move it finally...

10.02.2011 9:50, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5102

Tatyana! This one was identified by Evgeny Tsvetkov (Saint Petersburg), who always identifies all my Geometridae. As far as I know, his suggestions are reliable enough. And he always doubts openly.

10.02.2011 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Spilosoma urticae

Pay attention to the basic white tendrils. It is on this basis form of visually distinguishable from Spilosoma lubricipeda Linnaeus, 1758

10.02.2011 0:40, Peter Khramov: comment on New pictures of Eugene Komarov and Basil Feoktistov

A friendly wave with photos tails pakemony mustache tightened in capes and hussars. Wellcome to the gallery ...

09.02.2011 23:08, Peter Khramov: comment on Published another 243 photos

Yevgeny Komarov, gave birth to a list of transfer, respectively, I have now moved them. If someone suddenly noticed any mistakes in these families - reported.

09.02.2011 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2588

Will upload tomorrow (think I have some in a collection).

09.02.2011 22:40, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4187

Agree!

09.02.2011 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Diachrysia chrysitis

It is time for these types of scatter. Diachrysia chrysitis there is only one # 4187 The rest are Diachrysia stenochrysis Warren, 1913 (the kind created and approved).

09.02.2011 19:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5081

Photo moved.

09.02.2011 19:55, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5058

Shot moved to "identified successfully".

09.02.2011 18:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5006

Moved and activated.

09.02.2011 18:03, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5025

Moved.

09.02.2011 18:00, Peter Khramov: comment on Fixed vspylvayuschie inscriptions Gallery

Pop label (shown if Hovering the cursor over the photo) for some images displayed incorrectly. Now the situation is corrected - you can see the Latin name or a message stating that the form of the butterfly in the photo is not defined.