Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127... 141

15.03.2011 20:23, Peter Khramov: comment on Agriades orbitulus

Eugene, tell me, where will not infa about the half, if the data were taken from the European checklist? ..

15.03.2011 11:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7402

Moved.

15.03.2011 11:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7435

Generally, yes, that's the idea. As for the shot location or date. As for naming a species, I'm not sure. Cause some photos illustrate species descriptions, so it's quite difficult to move easily a photo from one species to another without checking if it's illustration or not, and if new species is activated there...

15.03.2011 2:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7402

Hey, Svyatoslav. Technical bug again?

14.03.2011 21:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7427

Ok then, moved.

14.03.2011 21:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7435

Don't update, just noticing is enough. Moved.

14.03.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7435

Svyatoslav, chose wrong name or?

14.03.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7428

Svyatoslav, comment, please...

14.03.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7687

Moved.

14.03.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7212

Went to E. viridissima.

14.03.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6322

To go.

14.03.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6437

Sum up?

14.03.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7427

Hey, Svyatoslav. Any comment?

14.03.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7244

Leaves "undetermined".

14.03.2011 0:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7224

Moved and activated.

14.03.2011 0:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7262

Goes to "uncertain" then. New suggestions needed.

14.03.2011 0:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7257

Leaves "uncertain".

14.03.2011 0:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7201

Went to males.

14.03.2011 0:28, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7271

Thanks, moved.

14.03.2011 0:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7283

More suggestions? "Uncertain", "identified..."?

14.03.2011 0:26, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7267

Fine. Moved and activated.

14.03.2011 0:26, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6349

To go.

14.03.2011 0:26, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7193

Moved.

14.03.2011 0:25, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6372

Went to Caligula boisduvalii.

14.03.2011 0:24, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7269

Moved and activated.

14.03.2011 0:24, Peter Khramov: comment on Antheraea polyphemus

Corrected.

12.03.2011 12:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6437

Roman, as for commenting, what's wrong with seeing previous ones? You should see them on this very page. Or you mean something else?

12.03.2011 12:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7223

Moved.

12.03.2011 12:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #7187

To go.

12.03.2011 12:26, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4881

Ok, goes to "identified successfully".

11.03.2011 14:00, Peter Khramov: comment on Colobura dirce

The first comments Dmitry moved from page to page description of the type of photography.

11.03.2011 13:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6078

Moved.

11.03.2011 13:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6079

Moved.

11.03.2011 13:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #5492

Leaves "undetermined".

11.03.2011 13:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6232

Moved and activated.

11.03.2011 2:17, Peter Khramov: comment on Colobura dirce

I do not understand why comments concerning the photos, proceed to a page with a description of the species. Photos will be replaced, and the comments left. By fotam it relates, not to mean ...

11.03.2011 0:56, Peter Khramov: comment on Colobura dirce

And where does the description page of the form, fellow moderator? -)

10.03.2011 21:27, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6437

Yury, would you get one more consult giving all this information to your consultant, to solve this question finally?

10.03.2011 19:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #1013

Ok then, if everybody agrees, leave selene.

10.03.2011 19:29, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6437

The very twin, not synonym?

09.03.2011 21:34, Peter Khramov: comment on Issoria eugenia

Dmitry, but people might just see one mention of the source and unsubscribe subspecies of it, without delving in all. After all, it too will be better than without subspecies at all?