Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5

26.02.2014 13:03, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #12850

This species is identified correctly.

26.02.2014 13:03, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #13661

This is Lycia hirtaria as it has yellow back strings whilst Lycia pomonaria does white ones.

16.01.2014 21:06, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #15243

Yep, :-))

14.01.2014 22:01, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #15243

Vasily, no, I didn't misnote. That time we were together with kot_begemot in Izmailovo in 2012. :-)

02.01.2014 17:01, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #26222

Vasya, this was IDed by Axel Steiner according to that link.)))

02.01.2014 11:05, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #26222

Already IDed. :-) http://lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=74741

28.12.2013 18:13, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #25933

Heliothis viriplaca

28.12.2013 18:11, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #25933

It's not Leucoptera spartifoliella. There is some mistake. This is some Noctuidae.

07.12.2013 11:50, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #24879

This and other photos of this Melitaea britomartis specimen identified by Thomas Netter on lepiforum.de

23.11.2013 10:22, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #25247

Those were laid by #25246 female, in ovarium. Sadly I threw them out, didn't wait for larvae. If I only knew that its ova overwinter.

22.11.2013 21:33, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #13845

Shamil, please check this http://lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acronicta_Cuspis

17.11.2013 13:35, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #8554

Oops, I thought it was mistake. Pardon.

17.11.2013 12:32, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #8556

This is also Cerura vinula, Cerura erminea has this black back stripe broken.

17.11.2013 12:31, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #8554

This is Cerura vinula

15.11.2013 14:09, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #24956

Serious doubts about food plant. This is despite likely to be Euonymus verrucosus, not europaeus, thus larvae can be of Yponomeuta cagnagella. Methink.

15.11.2013 12:11, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #8148

I think this is Yponomeuta plumbella. Similar angle shot is here, to compare: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepidopterenforum/lepiwiki/pics/heidrun_melzer2/plumbella_yponomeuta_Leipzig_2009_f.jpg

15.11.2013 11:33, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #4342

Not sure if there is any sense to show the full cycle of larva development or just the last age would be enough?

15.11.2013 11:29, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #17046

Why are here for anyway Acronicta rumicis larvae?

11.11.2013 12:52, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #24809

Caloptilia jurateae, not in the list

11.11.2013 12:10, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #17470

Not Cyclophora pendularia

11.11.2013 12:09, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #17472

This is not Cyclophora pendularia larva

09.11.2013 12:10, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #24529

How come Orgyia recens came here? This is bug

09.11.2013 12:02, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #16471

This one should be moved to Aethes triangulana

09.09.2013 12:29, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on Epinotia tedella

This is a glitch. "Other Epinotia" photo Vasiliya- Sarbanissa transiens.

19.08.2013 21:34, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #11035

Aristotelia ericinella, definition Oliver Rist.

08.04.2013 11:54, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #21688

Lomographa temerata.

15.03.2013 19:26, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #21146

The holotype and only photo in the internet. http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/db_typen/display.pl?id=4285&t=t_entry&t_type=HT If I understand the family Thyatiridae, in Fauna Europaea is no such taxa as Parapsestis lichenea.

19.02.2013 18:15, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #11291

This one is Elegia similella indeed.

19.02.2013 18:14, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #11288

I'm afraid he won't help. Here are some opinions by pros: http://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=25206.

18.02.2013 22:01, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #11288

Alexandr Zhakov and Friedmar Graf identified it as Apomyelois bistriatella on Lepiforum.de.

17.02.2013 18:59, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #14082

Batrachedra praeangusta.

17.02.2013 18:47, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #21054

Isophrictis sp.

17.02.2013 18:46, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #21055

Pyralis farinalis.

26.01.2013 15:02, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #8953

This is definitely not Sciota fumella, hard to say what's this, hard lighting.

26.01.2013 15:00, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #2007

I checked out once more on German website, so reckon this is Sciota fumella.

26.01.2013 14:55, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #11308

Right, Petr, Sciota rhenella has photos of a different specimen.

25.01.2013 21:43, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #11308

Petr, didn't get the q about different speciment. As for Sciota fumella, I rechecked it there after Vlad: http://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Sciota_Fumella.

23.01.2013 21:19, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #8745

Why, guess this is Udea fulvalis.

20.01.2013 20:27, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #20112

Angle isn't great. To "uncertain".

20.01.2013 20:20, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on Hedya nubiferana

Peter is a glitch Hedya salicella here (on this page) should not be, although Photos Hedya nubiferana it is not.

20.01.2013 20:04, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #20144

This one and the next pic seem to be the same specimen.

20.01.2013 14:12, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #20143

This is Rhyacionia pinicolana as well, check Rhyacionia buoliana on http://www.lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Rhyacionia_Buoliana, distinctions are obvious.

20.01.2013 11:02, Andrey Ponomarev: comment on photo #20144

This is Rhyacionia pinicolana. I checked this on German website http://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Fotouebersicht_Schmetterlingsfamilien_8.