Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9... 16
Hmm, on the wings of color - green. Interrogative. This refers to a reflection? ..
Celypha rosaceana?
Scopula marginepunctata?
I'm afraid there no way underside (
Of course the second option. = Verify)
Alexander, however the second time did not have to endure. An hour passed with no load :(
I think that thisCucullia absinthii
Hadena filigrana (Esper, 1788) from J. P. Gorbunov, VN Olshvang Butterflies Southern Urals. Directory determinant. Yekaterinburg: Socrates, 2008. [86] It's a typo or not? ..
AnotherArchips... I still make a mistake)
Who would confirm or deny)
Closer thanCelypha siderananot found, but this is not it :(
Blueberries should be there to look chtol =)
Yeah, I figured. Forgotten, that is old-school forum. Here you can not just copy the link, you must first click on it =)
Peter and I tried, produces only a link page in which your post. That's why I write what is not working. http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&view=findpost&p=1570419
Oops, I think the window is left open editing ( Correct yourself.
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&st=27200# post # 23223 (does not work they go to normal recording)
Ie Information on photo no one female? .. And they have them fly at least? .. (I want to try to withdraw, but it is necessary because the female =)
OrNola aerugulaandMeganola albula... (Victor Yepishin)
Similarly, in the same place a year =) http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32542 This male or impossible to say exactly?
Only I suggested not to reinvent the wheel, and at least collect his major pieces. Determinant benefit a lot. Yes, the same determinant Migranova. He is the same essence that insektamo, but no illustrations. (I think that sooner or later everything will come to that, what I'm saying, but only by his unknown)
There have already determinants. Making the similarity insektamo. Mikrocheshuyu, the Far East, border types, etc. add later. Local search is already available, it is necessary to ask for permission and copy insektamo, and let the user chooses that it is more convenient. Plus, these methods can be cross :)
After an hour (if not mistaken) view photos after downloading is not correct. This will make the moderators.
They are there a bunch!
Alexander, I looked. Photos are excellent, I said earlier. "Crash" with framing in the series took place at.
Sergey, if the resolution allows photos may cost them a little tighter crop? .. You have a great series of photos, but the butterflies in the frame is occupied, I think, a very small part. I can help if there are difficulties. =)
Yes, it swallowtail. Soon we should pupate.
Oleg Baking laments that kind of photo - Linden (Cucullia lindei) And even the photo itself is defined correctly, but the page is not rendered type =) (http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2560) http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&view=findpost&p=1568538
similar, but Sakhalin yet ...
Cucullia dracunculi, definition photo, inaccurate, Oleg Baking, molbiol.
Thank you, Eugene! Hmm, no pictures in the determinant of this kind =)
Hipparchia autonoe?
This is a mystery to me ...
Pseudochazara hippolyte?
Coenonympha pamphilus?
Lythria cruentaria?
Polyommatus ripartii?
Eucosma conterminana?
Thank you! =)
Put please Ilia in "determinants".
Present in the issue, as if the type is set photos. Either broken link or somewhere Oshibochka crept ...
Basil, about transparency. Then the idea was to highlight the side of the wing, to expose all of the bristles on it and veins. It turned out not quite what I wanted. The most disadvantage of this scheme - it turns dark. On a white background so it does not turn.
Alexander, thank you. Yes I do, if not lёtanny instance, I antennku any break or wing will not bend ... =) That's just completed the swallowtail ... hopefully, normal work.
And you look http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4827 So it is this butterfly as the photo. Just most of it around the environment is too bright to see the good parts. And when shooting on a white background metering a white paper will not eliminates, exposure shortens. That's the result of "dark matter".
Why is there one group tracks Didyma? ..)
Lacanobia suasa?
Thank you. Just before the end of the method worked. It is necessary to shoot in RAW and then at the dark part of the film development to drive to black and black. And as the background was a dark matter, it becomes completely black. Not all butterflies it works, some very dark colors on the wings.
I'll try to straighten it, it may turn out better than the last time =)
It's a pity. Write down that offer. Maybe even meet a similar =) Incidentally, I did not throw one gusyanku the stood - and she pupate. Waiting may be that worthwhile work.
Yuri, the patient ?. =)
perfectly preserved :)
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (23.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
- 13:02, P. Khramov: Bombus → Bombus sylvestris....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Interview with Alexander Zatakovoy, one of the wild Russian entomologists
- 20th International Insect Fair in Moscow (Russia, October 2023)
- Sammilan Shetty's butterfly park in Karnataka state, India
