E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73... 80

28.08.2011 18:48, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #2045

Petr! As far as I know by many shots at different websites, Vitaly didn't shoot in Russian North or Northwest. All shots were made in his village house in Moscow region. Move to comae.

27.08.2011 12:49, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #10159

I'd suggest Plebejus argus what shot author roughly retouched with hue/saturation tool and got as a result red orange instead of yellow, light blue at the main part of a hind wing instead of gray etc. I used to blunder like this at the beginning of my practicing digital photography. By the way, that would be good to note that for authors uploading their shots not to use such hard "beauty" ...

27.08.2011 10:04, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #2045

There is the next quotation: "Not so lately there was published Kaila and Albrecht work [Kaila, Albrecht, 1994] revisioned this group. Authors showed that Т. griseata can be only in limited areas such as the south part of the Scandinavian Peninsula, Baltic States and Northwest Russia (Leningrad region, Karelia). All info about Т. griseata met in other European regions included Russia, also West ...

27.08.2011 9:21, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9794

Hm, many men, many minds :)

27.08.2011 2:00, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9794

Also, Petr! Why do you name the website as "botanical" one? This is some youngsters slang? For them we're surely all botanists, but this website is entomological, isn't it?

27.08.2011 1:57, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9794

Petr! I'm not photo genius at all, but have been practicing macrophotography for a long time. This photo (if it ever can be named "photo") is not discussable from any photographical point of view. Fully approve Dmitry and Vasily opinions! There are photographic view and just defective work when a photographer didn't manage to shoot a thing without all this rubbish in the foreground! So that's the ...

27.08.2011 0:59, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #10183

Very big "but"! Cnaemidophorus rhododactylus shots shown at this website don't suit this one at all! Again, no shot location info :( What about Uganda or Peru? :) )

26.08.2011 22:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #2045

No info about shot location, but seeing at author's it should be Moscow region. I'm not an expert in Geometridae, but Evgeny Tsvetkov (Saint Petersburg) thinks there can be only Timandra comae in Central Russia.

23.07.2011 23:33, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9794

Looked at the nearby one too ... Petr, if such gags even can be there?

23.07.2011 23:32, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9794

So what, there is even butterfly?

22.07.2011 19:52, Evgeny Komarov: comment on Schinia imperialis

In personal communication Alexei matt (ZIN), the species is distributed throughout the Caucasus in the subalpine and alpine zones.

14.07.2011 21:14, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9279

Cratocephalus palaemon (Pallas, 1771), as I can see.

30.06.2011 22:33, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9539

Evgeny! These items are being boiled now ;) If it turns out to be something different, I'll correct this. Athalia in Russia usually lives in more dry statias, and britomartis prefers humid meadows. Anyway, devil knows. Will check it up.

07.06.2011 8:14, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5751

Well, pointless to argue with Boris! Thus amandus!

07.06.2011 6:23, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9258

Seems like author's blunder. Adding first Lycaena in a row he put there also Polygonia. Not possible to identify so wrongly.

06.06.2011 7:12, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5752

Probably, icarus!

06.06.2011 7:09, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5751

There seems to be a couple of icarus! The male has a shine different from amandus, and it's full of orange spots!

06.06.2011 7:07, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9240

Not amandus but P. coelestinus!

06.06.2011 7:06, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9241

Mistake! This is not amandus but P. coelestinus, what we can clearly see by a very bright light blue dust on its hind wings!

31.05.2011 11:25, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8523

Polyommatus icarus.

31.05.2011 11:20, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9218

Hypomecis punctinalis.

31.05.2011 11:19, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9219

Hypomecis punctinalis.

31.05.2011 9:51, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9222

Euclidia glyphica.

31.05.2011 9:48, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9223

Euclidia glyphica.

31.05.2011 6:38, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9230

Siona lineata.

15.05.2011 12:05, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9094

The species is added to the database/approved.

05.05.2011 21:13, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9037

The species is added to the database/approved.

05.05.2011 21:13, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9037

Brahmaea tancrei, Fustaut, 1896.

28.04.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9037

To be picky enough: according to Synev (exactly, Zolotuhin in Synev Catalogue), in Russian Far East can be only tancrei who has a note "wrong identifying certhia auct.". Roman! Reask after Dmitry: why certhia? Petr! Don't move it anywhere till discussion finished.

27.04.2011 13:16, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9037

Petr, didn't get it, what for Charissa???!!! This is Brahmaea!!!

27.04.2011 13:10, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #5796

Not 100% sure either. They caught metis there, but I managed just to shoot this very butterfly, not catch. Or shooting, or catching, as a rule :(

26.04.2011 6:49, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8397

Yura Arzanov!

24.04.2011 21:01, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #9037

Such wrong identifyings are caused by author's neglecting shot/caught location info! Million times there was told about this!

24.04.2011 20:56, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8397

Boris! So sign it like you told, anyway it can be easier just to mention female caught/location :) The rest is interesting but irrelevant indeed. By the way, I was in Dombay that very time!

24.04.2011 20:54, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8397

This species is identified correctly.

23.04.2011 11:03, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7980

Meh, should be for sure. Talked about it already!

12.04.2011 5:49, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8379

Seems to be just Zygaena lonicerae!?

12.04.2011 5:38, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8379

Sorry!

11.04.2011 22:05, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8378

Why instead? I asked what it was on #8379 shot! Meh...

11.04.2011 20:37, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8378

Evgeny! What about this, #8379?

11.04.2011 20:35, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4501

My label says this.

10.04.2011 22:00, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8397

Whatever! Let it be 0.75 then. But many wonder for sure the species shot location, or its expansion. Or one just doesn't want collectors to find that out? Can't see other reasons to hide this information, cause you even have some fields to fill in with this info when uploading photos. As for location map, that's cool! But, as for me personally, when I find some interesting butterfly in web, I ...

10.04.2011 17:03, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8397

Petr! I meant a collection item, in this case its value will be null for sure! There it 0.25, ok, some people just need to have a look at a species. But only 0.25 :)

10.04.2011 9:59, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8397

Boris! Why do you publish photos with no info about shot/caught location? The same as item without label in collection. Species seems to be rare, but with no label it has a null value.

09.04.2011 13:53, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7232

Didn't get it myself :(

09.04.2011 9:12, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #7232

Sasha, where did you find it? I broke my mind with this beast. Was clear to the family, but further, no way!

05.04.2011 15:49, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8280

Hipparchia pellucida! To move! There is no semele in Crimea and can not be, since this is more northern species.

05.04.2011 15:46, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8281

H. pellucida expansion: the mountain part of the southern coast of the Crimea... H. semele: Baltic states, Belarus, Western Ukraine. To the north till the Leningrad region, to the east till Smolensk, Bryansk, Kaluga and Ivanovo regions (reference: A. L. L'vovsky, D. V. Morgun. Lepidoptera of Western Europe). Petr! Move to H. pellucida!

05.04.2011 11:30, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8266

Pterophorus pentadactyla, Linnaeus, 1758.

05.04.2011 11:30, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #8265

Pterophorus pentadactyla, Linnaeus, 1758.

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.