E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484... 497

04.05.2012 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11532

Sorry. Or I don't dig it and such things can happen.

04.05.2012 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11532

I suppose we can rely upon Dmitry's identifying. This is likely such kind of a sexual dimorphism.

04.05.2012 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12556

Likely there is no any. Let's wait for Boris Stradomsky who might put a dot on it.

04.05.2012 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12557

Its wingspan is about 6cm (measured with a ruler). Bigger than those average I caught before. Most curious that I literally forgot its pupa that was left in the soil on a sill with no any care. Whatsoever, one morning I just saw it sitting over there!

04.05.2012 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12558

The underside of the female on #12557 photo.

02.05.2012 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12542

This species is identified correctly.

02.05.2012 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12551

We've got such one already discussed.

02.05.2012 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12551

Seems to be Cucullia blattariae.

02.05.2012 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12542

That's right.

02.05.2012 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12549

I miss lots of stuff, sorry :) Aglia tau, no doubt.

01.05.2012 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12496

Amerila astreus (Drury, 1773).

01.05.2012 16:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12493

Couldn't it be Ideopsis similis? Or something of the kind.

19.04.2012 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3247

Broken too.

08.04.2012 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12109

Petr, move it to "identified successfully": http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id175290/. This is just a subspecies.

08.04.2012 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12109

This species is identified correctly.

07.04.2012 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Papilio agestor

DescriptionParantica sita

07.04.2012 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Parantica sita

DescriptionPapilio agestor

07.04.2012 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12109

Yes, that's thoas (identified such today on one internet forum). Likely to be some subspecies.

07.04.2012 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12099

Needed for sure, but we seem to get no any (the photo is not a collection one). Rather thus far move it to "uncertain" keeping the species as it's identified. I might have prematurely identified demophon as the most known of the genus.

05.04.2012 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12099

Archaeoprepona demophon

05.04.2012 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12099

Gah, meant Prepona demophon, Linnaeus, 1758. Anyway, it should be moved out of here.

05.04.2012 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12099

It ain't no way G. Sarpedon! This is an American Nymphalidae of Prepona genus. I'd suggest Papilio demophon, Linnaeus, 1758.

05.04.2012 14:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12249

The whole set of #12251; #12250; #12252; #12247; #12253; #12246 should be moved to that. It's not way much variable yet.

05.04.2012 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3331

Photo of the same species, #12281, is at the admin panel.

05.04.2012 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12274

Hepialus humuli (Linnaeus, 1758), male. Seems to be no any other.

05.04.2012 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12249

Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?

05.04.2012 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12251

Analogued to #12246 photo.

05.04.2012 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12250

Analogued to #12246 shot.

05.04.2012 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12252

Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?

05.04.2012 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12247

Analogued to #12246 photo.

05.04.2012 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12253

Analogued to #12246 photo.

05.04.2012 8:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12246

Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?

02.04.2012 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9960

Cerura sp. ?erminea?

01.04.2012 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7106

See no candidates more: might be moved to "identified successfully".

31.03.2012 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #7106

Correbia lycoides (Walker, 1854). http://www.zonacharrua.com/butterflies/Andes%20-%20Correbia%20lycoides.htm.

31.03.2012 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #10659

Move it there.

31.03.2012 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #9992

Spilosoma lutea (Hufnagel, 1766).

31.03.2012 8:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11884

The underside.

31.03.2012 8:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11884

This species is identified correctly.

29.03.2012 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12096

Imo, for an "uncertain" male that's quite sure: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id43111/.

27.03.2012 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11887

Nevermind. I've just ignored the search but checked Archiearis genus first thinking thus far it still belongs to that.

27.03.2012 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11887

Uh-huh, got it. I just checked it up in Archiearis as usual. Faulty me :)

25.03.2012 23:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11883

To move to Archiearis parthenias, and no any questions.

25.03.2012 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11887

Namely, this is A. notha male if we look at its forewings http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/arc_not.htm.

25.03.2012 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12033

I relied on Alexandr's website http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/epi_tri.htm. The female underside drawn my attention.

24.03.2012 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12033

Is it the same as #12034? Then it's the very Epirrhoe tristata (Linnaeus, 1758), seems to be female.

24.03.2012 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11883

This species is identified correctly.

24.03.2012 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11887

I'll add the species once as it gets possible.

24.03.2012 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #11887

Rather could be moved to Archiearis notha (Hubner, 1803), "uncertain".

23.03.2012 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #12034

The author is right, it's likely Epirrhoe tristata (Linnaeus, 1758).

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.