Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...492 493 494 495 496 497
There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it. Zygaena osterodensis Reiss, 1921.
Paratalanta hyalinalis, Hübner 1796 (http://ukmoths.org.uk/showzoom.php?id=3644).
Graphium aristeus, Stoll 1780 (http://linus.it.uts.edu.au/~don/larvae/papi/arist.html).
This species is identified correctly.
Macrothylacia rubi, Linnaeus, 1758.
Tortrix (Pandemis) heparana, Denis & Schiffermuller 1775 (http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?id=2395).
Ochlodes venata, Bremer & Grey, 1853.
Nemophora degeerella, Linnaeus, 1758.
Ochlodes venata, Bremer & Grey, 1853.
Lycaena virgaureae Linnaeus, 1758.
Diacrisia sannio Linnaeus, 1758 (male).
Laothoe amurensis, Fischer v. Waldheim, 1830.
Lomographa bimaculata, Fabricius, 1775.
Macaria alternata, Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775.
This species is identified correctly. Dipleurina lacustrata, Panzer 1804 (http://www.rodeland.de/fotos/lepidoptera/dipleurina_lacustrata.htm).
This species is identified correctly. http://catocala.narod.ru/las02.html.
This species is identified correctly. Sergey, you are right, this is Ostrinia palustralis, Hubner 1796 (http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php/photo/4138/size/big/ppuser/3996)/.
This species is identified correctly.
A. menippe zheltushka one of the largest and the world in general is one of the largest species of the family Pieridae (Belyanko).
This one is probably Lythria cruentaria female, Hufnagel, 1767 (the species varies much).
This species is identified correctly. Eumedonia eumedon, Esper 1780 (http://mr-1.ru/PHOTO/BUTTERFLYS/eumedonia_eumedon.htm).
There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it. The white form of P. macularia has absolutely different pattern.
No objections (also can't approve).
Lythria cruentaria, Hufnagel 1767 (http://www.rodeland.de/fotos/lepidoptera/lythria_cruentaria.htm)/.
Thetidia (Antonechloris) smaragdaria. Fabricius 1787 (http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/PlagoPulve.htm).
This species is identified correctly. http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/PlagoPulve.htm.
Female (males are smaller and colored bright red).
This species is identified correctly. http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/m/macrothylacia_rubi.html.
This species is identified correctly.
S. lutea Females have a white color and yellow males.
Spilosoma lutea, Hufnagel 1766 (female): http://mosregbut.narod.ru/spilosoma-lutea.htm.
This species is identified correctly. Diachrysia chrysitis, Linnaeus, 1758.
You're right, this one is Euclidia glyphica (reference: www.lepidoptera.pro).
This species is identified correctly. Yes, you're right, this one is Pyrrhia umbra, Hufnagel 1766 (http://webh01.ua.ac.be/vve/Checklists/Lepidoptera/Noctuidae/PumbraX.htm).
Suggest this can be Melanchra persicariae, Linnaeus 1761 (http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/dir39/id407/).
Actias selene, Hubner 1807.
Caterpillars feed on scabiosa and many other plants. Butterfly flying day. South Europe, is rare.
The caterpillars feed on the bedstraw and form clusters, is rare. South Europe, Central Asia.
Caterpillars feed on sea buckthorn and Loja. South Europe.
In the Moscow region usually catches the willow-tea green caterpillar form, has the same cramped yellow spots and red horn.
This species is identified correctly. A butterfly was raised from this caterpillar (fed on willow herb).
Caterpillar can be safely nurse on willow-tea (Cyprus).
This species is identified correctly. (http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/z/zygaena_minos.html).
This species is identified correctly. (http://www.insektenbox.de/schmet/rotspa.htm).
There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it. This is Melanargia halimede, Menetries 1859 (http://rusinsects.com/satyrid/s-me-hal.htm).
This species is identified correctly. (http://www.orion-berlin.de/projekte/schmetter/tag/arten/adippe.htm) Doubt if the ID is correct, white dorsal stripes are absent.
This species is identified correctly. (http://www.orion-berlin.de/projekte/schmetter/tag/arten/adippe.htm) Doubt if the ID is correct, white dorsal stripes are absent.
This species is identified correctly. (http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/noc/florid.htm).
This species is identified correctly. (http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/FurcuFurcu.htm).
This species is identified correctly. (http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/FurcuFurcu.htm).
News
- 09.04.2024: Recognition of species/taxa by file names of uploaded photos has become more convenient
- 28.03.2024: We changed timeouts for the author to edit some data for his photos on the website
- 19.03.2024: Insecta.pro and the entomological forum Integration
New photos (23.04.2024)
Fresh from the community
- 18:03, P. Khramov: A nice video from 2004 with Oleg Go...
- 13:02, P. Khramov: Bombus → Bombus sylvestris....
Popular insects
Recommended blog topics
- A. Gordon, O. Gorbunov, V. Murzin on Russian TV in 2004
- Entomologist? What kind of job is it?
- Meanwhile, in Kotelnich
- Lubbock (USA, TX) residents are disturbed with moth invasion
