Create an Account E-mail: Password: Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия


Photo #23884: Damora sagana


Damora sagana

Click image to enlarge

Base gallery. Upperside. Pinned specimen.

Photo: Alex Dumchus. Image without retouching at the website. Identified by: Eugene Karolinskiy

Date and time, location shooting/catching: 2012-06-00 00:00:00, Китай, Сычуань

Comments on this image

29.10.2013 11:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Basil! I am amazed at your composure.
Sergei Kotov Photo Saga nothing to do with. There is a theme "The relationship of users and moderators". to go ahead and his opus, young man

29.10.2013 11:37, Svetlana Shchavelina

Licka this site has. Go to the tab "Authors", select the user, and go to his page. Dumped his e-mail and personal resources (if any). However, in a personal and rude - bad form. Controversial issues can and should be addressed with a cool head.

29.10.2013 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov

Sergey, this site is not anonymous, e-mail address specified for each author in the "Authors", study site, write to your private address. :)

29.10.2013 11:29, Sergei Kotov

Svetlana Oxalic answer. In a post you wrote "write to the PM."
PM on this site, to the great regret, is not, and therefore will have to resolve disputes directly in the comments.

29.10.2013 11:27, Sergei Kotov

"Write in a personal"
PM on this site, to the great regret, is not, and therefore will have to resolve disputes directly in the comments.

29.10.2013 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Damora sagana / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

29.10.2013 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov

With this the user stops all communication and do their job as the moderator.
I do not know just where Sergei saw the rude (and did not get a clear answer)? Of course I understand, on a human, a person genuinely wants to help the site: it is commendable.But why is it so strongly, to insist on the transfer of mass exclamation marks (which is mauvais ton). Yes, and sometimes giving an obviously incorrect definition. After all, I believe that transferring photos moderator shares the responsibility to identify. All said, enough is enough.

29.10.2013 10:44, Svetlana Shchavelina

Men, are you - wild? !!!
No one in the Internet space are not allowed to contact other disrespectful and rude, even for the first time, though in return. Want pohamit - write in a personal, and here you and others read, actually. I say this to you very seriously as a moderator of another resource boooolshoy experience and the owner of its own resources.

29.10.2013 10:21, Sergei Kotov

I did not understand well, just fanned the tragedy because of a trifle. Well written comments, and wrote. More photos will not be connected to comment. And again I say: I will respond to rudeness rudeness. Do you need it? Maybe you already start to talk to me normally, but not in such a tone?

29.10.2013 10:18, Sergei Kotov

Why just spam. Spam - Spam is a message advertising. And here I do not advertise.

29.10.2013 4:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov

What do you see in my post sharp and unfair? GPs I see on this page the next, completely neuzhny comment that would otherwise not be called spam. If it were not united photos were, and were individually then another thing: should indicate that it is the top-mole of the butterfly, whose underside is shown in such a picture.And why here? The life of me, I do not see the logic.

29.10.2013 1:38, Sergei Kotov

And what do you react at me ??? I can also. And even harder. And even had time to prove it to you. But tell me at the mercy: it you want? Maybe it is easier to communicate easily? When I was well treated, I am also good in return. But when I start to chat with bad and rude, I'm sorry, this is not going to suffer and I will answer as bad and rude.Here's a math. And you have to put up with it, you want it or not.

29.10.2013 1:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov

So why write it? After photos are linked to the group top-underside. In the morning I get home and send it as a male Damora sagana in place. Or do you think that this is what the photo is lacking at least one comment?

29.10.2013 0:30, Sergei Kotov

The same butterfly, as in the photo # 23885, therefore, A. sagana

Your comment

Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages. international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog, 2007—2022.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.