Create an Account E-mail: Password: Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Photo #23884: Damora sagana

Male

Damora sagana

Click image to enlarge

Base gallery. Upperside. Pinned specimen.

Photo: Alex Dumchus. Image without retouching at the website. Identified by: Eugene Karolinskiy

Date and time, location shooting/catching: 2012-06-00 00:00:00, Китай, Сычуань

Comments on this image

29.10.2013 11:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Basil! I am amazed at your composure.
Sergei Kotov Photo Saga nothing to do with. There is a theme "The relationship of users and moderators". to go ahead and his opus, young man

29.10.2013 11:37, Svetlana Shchavelina

Licka this site has. Go to the tab "Authors", select the user, and go to his page. Dumped his e-mail and personal resources (if any). However, in a personal and rude - bad form. Controversial issues can and should be addressed with a cool head.

29.10.2013 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov

Sergey, this site is not anonymous, e-mail address specified for each author in the "Authors", study site, write to your private address. :)

29.10.2013 11:29, Sergei Kotov

Svetlana Oxalic answer. In a post you wrote "write to the PM."
PM on this site, to the great regret, is not, and therefore will have to resolve disputes directly in the comments.

29.10.2013 11:27, Sergei Kotov

"Write in a personal"
PM on this site, to the great regret, is not, and therefore will have to resolve disputes directly in the comments.

29.10.2013 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Damora sagana / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

29.10.2013 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov

With this the user stops all communication and do their job as the moderator.
I do not know just where Sergei saw the rude (and did not get a clear answer)? Of course I understand, on a human, a person genuinely wants to help the site: it is commendable.But why is it so strongly, to insist on the transfer of mass exclamation marks (which is mauvais ton). Yes, and sometimes giving an obviously incorrect definition. After all, I believe that transferring photos moderator shares the responsibility to identify. All said, enough is enough.

29.10.2013 10:44, Svetlana Shchavelina

Men, are you - wild? !!!
No one in the Internet space are not allowed to contact other disrespectful and rude, even for the first time, though in return. Want pohamit - write in a personal, and here you and others read, actually. I say this to you very seriously as a moderator of another resource boooolshoy experience and the owner of its own resources.

29.10.2013 10:21, Sergei Kotov

I did not understand well, just fanned the tragedy because of a trifle. Well written comments, and wrote. More photos will not be connected to comment. And again I say: I will respond to rudeness rudeness. Do you need it? Maybe you already start to talk to me normally, but not in such a tone?

29.10.2013 10:18, Sergei Kotov

Why just spam. Spam - Spam is a message advertising. And here I do not advertise.

29.10.2013 4:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov

What do you see in my post sharp and unfair? GPs I see on this page the next, completely neuzhny comment that would otherwise not be called spam. If it were not united photos were, and were individually then another thing: should indicate that it is the top-mole of the butterfly, whose underside is shown in such a picture.And why here? The life of me, I do not see the logic.

29.10.2013 1:38, Sergei Kotov

And what do you react at me ??? I can also. And even harder. And even had time to prove it to you. But tell me at the mercy: it you want? Maybe it is easier to communicate easily? When I was well treated, I am also good in return. But when I start to chat with bad and rude, I'm sorry, this is not going to suffer and I will answer as bad and rude.Here's a math. And you have to put up with it, you want it or not.

29.10.2013 1:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov

So why write it? After photos are linked to the group top-underside. In the morning I get home and send it as a male Damora sagana in place. Or do you think that this is what the photo is lacking at least one comment?

29.10.2013 0:30, Sergei Kotov

The same butterfly, as in the photo # 23885, therefore, A. sagana

Your comment

Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2022.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.