Photo #35553: Lepidoptera sp.

04.03.2016 23:13, Peter Khramov

Nothing decided not to. Stas does not appear.

04.03.2016 22:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin

and with it that we decided ???

16.11.2015 13:43, Peter Khramov

Ok, we will discuss the situation with Stas and poreshat question.

16.11.2015 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov

Peter, this kind - Polyommatus rueckbeili, to which the curator put subspecies khamul Korb, 2009 on our website is present as a subspecies Polyommatus juldusa - https://insecta.pro/taxonomy/51427. In order not to create two of the same taxon at the rank of one kind and another in the rank of subspecies, it is necessary to raise the rank of sub-species to species (once daily curator thinks so). If not, then subspecies multiplied by 0 and create a new look.new subspecies :)

15.11.2015 18:34, Stan Korb

This kind of Polyommatus rueckbeili. I do not know who was "most databases," and see whether the drafters of the types of these taxa, but so far from iphigenia juldusa-rueckbeili-kirgisorum, that there are doubts about their competence. I researched all types of taxa in this group, and in the nature of work with them. juldusa - a fan of wet habitats, rueckbeili - xerophyte, but still occurs frequently in the alpine zone.

27.11.2014 18:12, Alexandr Zhakov

View, which is described subspecies, treated as a subspecies in most databases: rueckbeili Forster, 1960 to the species Polyommatus juldusa, Agrodiaetus iphigenia. to include any type of data subtypes?