Photo #41398: Lepidoptera sp.

15.07.2015 14:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin

As photos of them, of course, does not define these genital differences. Butterfly not only in the hands of the need to keep. Mikalezisy difficult group and the photos of them to determine - you either know them very well, or poke a finger in the sky. Article here Entomologist 102 (1279), but it is not publicly available. By the way do not forget about the form M. pitana (Staudinger, 1897).That is, if you do not get bored, read a mess going on there. http://www.bicyclus.se/docs/Brattstrom_et_el_2014_TLR.pdf

15.07.2015 9:12, Evgeny Kotelevsky

Peter, I agree that it is a pity, but the road will lie down and wait for a precise definition

15.07.2015 9:11, Evgeny Kotelevsky

Dmitri, in vague, so vague in order to exactly how we will understand. And you as genital differences define photo? If not mistaken, then this tie is necessary to keep in the hands of

15.07.2015 0:00, Peter Khramov

It's a pity.

15.07.2015 0:00, Peter Khramov Corrected data.

Mycalesis patiana / Confidently identified / Evgeny Kotelevsky → Not identified.

14.07.2015 21:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Eugene! It turns out you were determined by baldy- seems / is unlikely. But this option is not satisfied with what you http: //lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/54595 ??? Also looks like ??? But the description of the type you need to watch (quite possibly genital differences). So it must be in an indefinite, until we know 100% difference. I have 20 copies, but still can not determine (((

14.07.2015 13:39, Peter Khramov

By the way, about this site. People, and tell me, here http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Species%20index.htm (lower section, Scientific name indexes) classification is more or less adequate or not?

14.07.2015 10:22, Evgeny Kotelevsky

Dmitry, I'm not an entomologist, and the difference can not explain to you ... that's defined on the site - http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Malaysia%20-%20Mycalesis%20patiana.htm

12.07.2015 21:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Explain the difference between M. patiana Eliot, 1969 (I can not find the description of the species) and M. anapita fucentia Fruhstorfer 1911 and the second year I'm racking my head