Photo #50603: Autophila gracilis

29.12.2015 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov

Thank you, Alexander, so much clearer. Now and in the second image is desired to change the comment. The first image of the form on the network, will be watching experts. :)))

29.12.2015 6:36, Alexander Belousov

Sorry for the confusion, he is guilty. After the assumption of Basil More photos sent to other specialists. With accurate opredelnie first was Alex, because of his and pointed. Now have all decide who "won." Thank you all for your help and explanations.

28.12.2015 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov

Alexander, I do not understand the course of your actions and determining the authorship of this kind. Today, you have posted photos on the definition of this type with the assumption that a different kind of a different subfamily.Two hours later, Vasily Sergienko, in his very careful manner definition of a species included gender and the most likely kind, explaining his cautious, not knowing a number of species which are at you but he does not know them. Two hours later confirmed his determination Balázs Benedek.You comments, listed only one has defined Alex Matt, and Balázs Benedek and Oleg Baking confirmed definition. This statement, in my opinion it is not true that in order to confirm, it is necessary to know the definition that made Alex mats. If the determination is made on their own, it is also a definition.And much of the defining Sergienko gone? From what can be seen in mobiole. The definition did Vasily Sergienko and confirmed, and possibly also identified Balázs Benedek. About the definition of other authors if you send them pictures, they too are really determined.If the definition of it in the photo mobiole after determining Sergienko and Balázs, then it is proof definition :). You put your interesting views of all four are defined in an awkward position. :))