Photo #55511: Nacoleia sp.

05.05.2016 12:16, Yuri Semejkin

For me, too. Have you ever seen something like that, but now something is not found. And it is necessary to check!

05.05.2016 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov

For me, it's a different kind of butterfly.

18.03.2016 10:58, Yuri Semejkin

In fact, put the first author who gave opisanie..V this case Milliere, 1879 A Nacoleia maculalis, as well as Dichocrocis sibiriflis, then that's all. In general, the whole thing of course taxonomists and curator of the site.

18.03.2016 10:15, Irina Nikulina

We've got kind of Nacoleia maculalis In Sinev in comments to maculalis written - "The erroneous definition: sibirialis auct (nec Zeller, 1852)." All the previous set to maculalis. Although Asian sites, including the jpmoth.org, she - Nacoleia sibirialis (Milliere, 1879) http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Nacoleia_sibirialis.html It would be necessary to deal with this.

18.03.2016 4:24, Yuri Semejkin

Nacoleia sibirialis Milliere, 1879 Determine Kirpichnikova VA Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS. Tucson is not exactly defined. To accurately determine the need genitals.