E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Коллекционный экземпляр #914, вид не определен

Вид определен неточно.

Куратор коллекции, данные о сборе, определении

Куратор коллекции: Alexander Korolev. Определение: Alexander Korolev.

Дата и место сбора

China. Chongqing Province Dabashan MtR, NE Heyu Vill. 310 52’ 42” N; 1090 00’ 00” E H=1220 m. 17.05.2010 0:00.

Состояние экземпляра

Расправленный.

Leptura quadrifasciata
The legs and antennae ara totaly black!
b.r.
G. Hufler

15.08.2023 17:27, Peter Khramov:

Identification (Ephippigerini sp.): Evgeniy Scherbakov.

15.08.2023 17:26, Peter Khramov:

Identification (Ephippigerini sp.): Evgeny Scherbakov.

15.08.2023 17:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Orthoptera / Imago / Tahar Sayah Ephippigerini / Female / Peter Khramov.

15.08.2023 17:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Orthoptera / Tahar Sayah Ephippigerini / Peter Khramov.

14.08.2023 15:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Female / Maxim Maximov.

14.08.2023 15:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Aporia hippia / Maxim Maximov.

14.08.2023 15:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Male / Iphiclides podalirius / Imago / Maxim Maximov.

14.08.2023 15:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Lycaena phlaeas / Maxim Maximov.

14.08.2023 15:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Pieris napi / Maxim Maximov.

14.08.2023 1:16, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

14.08.2023 1:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

14.08.2023 1:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

14.08.2023 0:52, Peter Khramov:

Initial identification by Juergen Peters: \"male Phasia hemiptera of the more femalish obscura-Form.\"

12.08.2023 22:31, Guntram Hufler:

femal, fa Argynnis paphia valesina
b.r.

09.08.2023 21:15, Peter Khramov:

The photo is just wonderful.

09.08.2023 20:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Male / Maxim Maximov.

09.08.2023 20:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Argynnis hyperbius / Female / Maxim Maximov.

09.08.2023 20:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Argynnis hyperbius / Female / Maxim Maximov.

09.08.2023 20:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Driopa mnemosyne adolphus / Otto Feldner.

09.08.2023 20:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Driopa mnemosyne adolphus / Otto Feldner.

09.08.2023 19:17, Maxim Maximov:

Melitaea trivia male.

09.08.2023 19:16, Maxim Maximov:

Argynnis hyperbius female.

09.08.2023 19:16, Maxim Maximov:

Argynnis hyperbius female.

08.08.2023 11:38, Yury Sokolkov:

I guess it's female.

07.08.2023 14:50, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny moved the photo to Galeruca interrupta.

06.08.2023 21:54, Peter Khramov:

The newly found glitches with the displaying of texts in the language adequate to the current version of the site, in particular, on the pages of the authors, have been fixed.

06.08.2023 18:31, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, they say on the forum that even the genus is different. Please check if the definition is correct...

03.08.2023 23:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Orthoptera / Yuriy Karpov Acrididae / Nikolai Vladimirov.

03.08.2023 23:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Orthoptera / Yuriy Karpov Acrididae / Nikolai Vladimirov.

01.08.2023 21:34, Peter Khramov:

On any page of the site at the top right there are buttons with the names of popular orders of insects. By clicking on the button with the squad, you will get the same website Insecta.pro, but where the displaying of information concerning species of all orders, with the exception of the selected one, will be minimized. I.e. by clicking on Diptera, we see information on Diptera all over the site, and beetles with butterflies and others will not get in the way. Now the explanatory label title has been added (it appears when you hover cursor over any of these buttons), plus a glitch has been fixed when taxa belonging to other insect orders (and not just to the selected one) could be displayed on the main page of the website in the "Frequently used taxa" section.

01.08.2023 19:05, Peter Khramov:

I will publish info regarding minor improvements of the website in this topic, And there will be separate topics in the \"News\" about larger upgrades.

01.08.2023 0:10, Peter Khramov:

There were probliems with correct language version at 404 error pages and in the footer of the website pages. They are solved now.

31.07.2023 20:29, Peter Khramov:

We are simultaneously working on improving the website in several areas: full redesign (including mobile-friendly version), Google Maps update, Acceleration of the webpages (some of them are too slow now) and we upload new text and graphic data. We translate a lot these days too.
If you have some thoughts/wishes, what is missing on the website right now (in any aspect — from technical to visual and content) — let us know in the comments or in the email, now is the best time to make changes on the Insecta.pro website.

31.07.2023 15:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Aleksandr Petip.

31.07.2023 15:44, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

31.07.2023 15:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Auchenorrhyncha / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

31.07.2023 15:43, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterophoridae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

31.07.2023 15:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Pterophoridae / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

31.07.2023 15:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eudicella mutica / Confidently identified / Male & female / Egor Dynastes.

31.07.2023 15:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eudicella mutica / Confidently identified / Male & female / Egor Dynastes.

31.07.2023 15:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Allograpta obliqua / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

31.07.2023 15:35, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dirphia ursina / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

31.07.2023 15:34, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lestes dryas / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

31.07.2023 15:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleophora paripennella / Tentatively identified / Zoran Bozovic.

31.07.2023 15:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elachista pigerella / Tentatively identified / Zoran Bozovic.

31.07.2023 15:25, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

31.07.2023 15:25, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

31.07.2023 15:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

31.07.2023 15:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

31.07.2023 15:24, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

31.07.2023 15:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

30.07.2023 16:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Zygaena haberhaueri.

30.07.2023 16:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Zygaena haberhaueri / Otto Feldner.

30.07.2023 15:32, Peter Khramov:

Just in case: the question of administration is irrelevant now, I have resumed work on the active site. So, if anyone can and will do it too, join me.

30.07.2023 15:24, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 15:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Acridoidea / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 15:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Peter Khramov Vladimir kashta.

30.07.2023 15:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acridoidea / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 14:33, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:33, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterophoridae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

30.07.2023 14:29, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:29, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.07.2023 14:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.07.2023 14:28, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

30.07.2023 14:25, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:25, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:25, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Eddy Verfaillie Leonid Savrasov.

30.07.2023 14:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celaenorrhinus fritzgaertneri / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

30.07.2023 14:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Automeris hamata / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

30.07.2023 14:11, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Leonid Savrasov.

30.07.2023 14:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Leonid Savrasov.

30.07.2023 14:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 14:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 14:04, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:04, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 14:01, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 14:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 13:59, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 13:59, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 13:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 13:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 13:58, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 13:57, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 13:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 13:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 13:56, Peter Khramov:

I move photos without species identification to upperspecies taxa, so that it would be easier for specialists to search for them and identificate the species.

30.07.2023 13:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male & female Diptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Peter Khramov.

30.07.2023 9:50, Yordan Kutsarov:

Sympetrum depresiculum

30.07.2023 9:49, Yordan Kutsarov:

Sympetrum depresiculum.

30.07.2023 9:48, Yordan Kutsarov:

I know the species Aeshna viridis male

16.07.2023 21:54, Andrey Solovyev:

Yeah, the specialist was here but it was no help. But the tape is worth thinking about.

16.07.2023 17:26, Peter Khramov:

The website is mobile-friendly only in part (main blocks). We'll make full mobile-friendly redesign (with all design elements) this summer.

09.07.2023 13:24, Peter Khramov:

So far, only one department has responded. They say that there is a paid survey of the flat/house, but very often no species is found there, so it's not a fact that it's worth it — it's up to you. Plus, they say, if it's a very small thing, you can try to collect them with gluetape and bring them to the nearest department of the Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology, where there are entomologists or similar specialists.

06.07.2023 11:20, Andrey Solovyev:

We are waiting for an answer, the invasion continues.

29.06.2023 18:53, Peter Khramov:

I wrote to a couple of branches to begin with. Let's see what people will say.

29.06.2023 14:00, Andrey Solovyev:

Yes, I have already brought them to the Moscow apartment, apparently. The same thing. A straight plot for a horror movie — an invasion of invisible insects.))

25.06.2023 23:45, Peter Khramov:

Please, specify at least order when you upload photos with indefinite species, so the specialists could find your photo and identify the species.

25.06.2023 23:41, Peter Khramov:

Please, specify at least order when you upload photos with indefinite species, so the specialists could find your photo and identify the species.

25.06.2023 23:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

25.06.2023 23:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

25.06.2023 20:18, Peter Khramov:

I don't have any acquaintances in the Moscow region Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology, I will try to ask Moscow specialists and people in other regions, maybe they will tell me something or they will bring it to the Moscow regional ones...

25.06.2023 18:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Nephrotoma / Irek Yusupov Nephrotoma scurra / Valentin Pilipenko.

25.06.2023 18:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Nephrotoma / Irek Yusupov Nephrotoma scurra / Valentin Pilipenko.

25.06.2023 18:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Nephrotoma / Irek Yusupov Nephrotoma scurra / Valentin Pilipenko.

25.06.2023 14:32, Peter Khramov:

You can add local species names again.

22.06.2023 15:14, Andrey Solovyev:

Moscow region.

22.06.2023 9:57, Valentin Pilipenko:

Nephrotoma scurra (Meigen, 1818)

22.06.2023 9:51, Valentin Pilipenko:

Family Pediciidae genus Pedicia sp.

21.06.2023 23:51, Peter Khramov:

We upload hundreds of new local insects names to the website database and we change searching algorithms for the local names. So, the manual uploading of the local names one by one is temporary unavailable. We'll turn the manual uploading function in few days.

21.06.2023 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Tell me what region you are in.

21.06.2023 21:51, Andrey Solovyev:

Yes, a specialist from the sanitary-epidemiological agency has already arrived, put "fog" all over the house, nothing helped.

21.06.2023 20:15, Peter Khramov:

Try contacting the Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology in your region. It is more likely to get help in such a matter there.

21.06.2023 20:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

21.06.2023 20:13, Peter Khramov:

Check out: https://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/81738

21.06.2023 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Calopteryx virgo?

21.06.2023 20:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calopteryx / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

21.06.2023 19:21, Nadezhda Ivanova:

Thank you. I figured out what it is)

21.06.2023 19:09, Andrey Solovyev:

We've been suffering for years, we don't know who they are, if we knew, but we don't know! ))

In general, there are some "insects". At night, they burn in bed and, how should I put it more accurately, "itch". They are not visible (apparently very small), it is not possible to catch them. They are afraid only of hot water with tar soap. And daily change of bed and underwear with washing at 90 degrees. We have been suffering for many years. House cleaning is very thorough. They were treated repeatedly with chemicals both from cans (permethrin and its derivatives, pyrethrum). Please help me determine who these are and how to destroy them! I can't give you a photo, because there is no way to catch them.

21.06.2023 12:51, Peter Khramov:

Good afternoon. Upload your photo to the website's gallery, then the users will be able to help you determine the species of dragonfly. Link at the top of any Photo page: upload to the site.

21.06.2023 8:39, Nadezhda Ivanova:

I amin the Tver region. I saw an amazing dragonfly of bright blue color. It's photographed, but in the photo it is darker and does not convey the full brightness of the dragonfly. For the sake of interest, I started searching the Internet for what this miracle is called. And I can't find it. The only photo of the same dragonfly in the article about the endangered species of dragonflies in Sweden... Can you tell me what species of dragonfly it is?



This is my photo
https://ibb.co/b6VfHCw


Py.Sy. don't throw slippers, I don't remember how to upload photos and whether they will be uploaded at all...

18.06.2023 20:56, Peter Khramov:

The problem is solved.

18.06.2023 20:55, Peter Khramov:

Upload a photo to the website from your personal account (leave the taxon field empty), and then our users will probably be able to help you with the definition.

17.06.2023 22:43, Feofan Ignatov:

https://dropmefiles.com/iFeNW

17.06.2023 22:42, Feofan Ignatov:

Good afternoon! It's not the first time I've met strange small insects at home, I can't find who it is. Tell me who knows, please. I took a photo with a microscope.

15.06.2023 13:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Male & female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

10.06.2023 20:41, Peter Khramov:

Earlier it was possible to select species in the catalog by general parameters only. Now we have premade selections. Our curators make and expand these selections by particular criteria. Such criteria can be for example locations (not on the level of Zoogeographical regions, countries and other big regions but level down). So, for a kickoff — Coleoptera of Lake Elton surroundings. You can find the curators’ names below the page of the particular premade selection. Please, contact curators if you would like to add or correct premade selection data. If you want to make your own selection, write me private message or email.

09.06.2023 21:25, Peter Khramov:

The species at Catalog section are sorted by last update (not by name) — if you didn't change any default parameters.

05.06.2023 14:42, Peter Khramov:

Yandex Maps analysts kindly shared with us the results of their study on frequency of animalistic names of Russian streets. We were shared the extended results for insect’s streets names. Below is the list of mosquito (mosquitos obviously are the champions in Russian streets naming) and other insects streets with our little additions. We group the streets into insects orders and sort the orders by frequency.
Important! If a street goes through several cities/towns/villages, Yandex counts this street in every location (i.e. indicates it as several separate streets). I think, it's not quite correct to calculate accurately the order frequency, and thus such streets are calculated just once in the list below.
Not so important but rather interesting. Yandex list is not complete of course (I’ve added at a guess several street names), but a good beginning is half a battle! If you know streets names of entomological themes, please share in comments and we will add them to the list. Or maybe it’s worth to add municipalities names too? One cannot leave aside such names as Kuznechiki (Grasshoppers) township, Motyli (Moths) or Gnusino (Gnat) village…
Diptera: 78 streets


Street nameMunicipalityRegion


1-й Комарский проезд
Тула
Тульская область


аллея Комариная Тропа
Петрозаводск
Республика Карелия


Закомарный переулок
Белгород
Белгородская область


Комаревская улица
Городской округ Ступино
Москва и Московская область


Комаревская улица
Отрадное
Брянская область


Комариная улица
Выборгский район
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


Комариная улица
Междуреченский район
Вологодская область


Комариная улица
Бобровка
Алтайский край


Комариная улица
Ярковский сельсовет
Новосибирская область


Комариная улица
Сургут
Ханты-Мансийский автономный округ - Югра


Комаринская улица
Иннокентьевка
Амурская область


Комаринская улица
Пермь
Пермский край


Комаринская улица
Уфа
Республика Башкортостан


Комаринская улица
Старцево
Орловская область


Комариный переулок
Нововилговское сельское поселение
Республика Карелия


Комарихинская улица
Комарихинский
Пермский край


Комаричская улица
Брянск
Брянская область


Комаровская улица
Двуреченское сельское поселение
Пермский край


Комаровская улица
Козловка
Чувашская Республика


Комаровская улица
Пензенский район
Пензенская область


Комаровская улица
Пермь
Пермский край


Комаровская улица
Энгельсский район
Саратовская область


Комаровская улица
Выборгский район
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


Комаровская улица
Мгинское городское поселение
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


Комаровская улица
Искитимский район
Новосибирская область


Комаровская улица
Мотково
Новосибирская область


Комаровская улица
Тюмень
Тюменская область


Комаровская улица
Комаровка
Тамбовская область


Комаровская улица
Литиж
Брянская область


Комаровская улица
Междуреченское сельское поселение
Ивановская область


Комаровская улица
Родники
Ивановская область


Комаровская улица
Рожны
Брянская область


Комаровская улица
Неклиновский район
Ростовская область


Комаровская улица
Николаевка
Ростовская область


Комаровский проезд
Санкт-Петербург
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


Комарская улица
Тула
Тульская область


Мошкинская улица
Новосильский район
Орловская область


Мухинская улица
Белогорск
Амурская область


Мухинская улица
Бурея
Амурская область


Мухинская улица
Завитинск
Амурская область


Мухинская улица
Могоча
Забайкальский край


Мухинская улица
Мухино
Амурская область


Мухинская улица
Тамбовка
Амурская область


Мухинская улица
Черняево
Амурская область


Мухинская улица
Верещагинский район
Пермский край


Мухинская улица
Игринский район
Удмуртская Республика


Мухинская улица
Теберда
Карачаево-Черкесская Республика


Мухинский переулок
Городской округ Прогресс
Амурская область


Мухинский переулок
Невер
Амурская область


Мухинский переулок
Спасск-Дальний
Приморский край


Мухинский переулок
Тверь
Тверская область


переулок Мухинка
Воскресенское
Вологодская область


улица Комарёвка
Ванина
Курская область


улица Комариный Рай
Энгельсский район
Саратовская область


улица Комариный Рай
Ленинское
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


улица Комариха
Квашёнки
Москва и Московская область


улица Комаровка
Прибайкальский район
Республика Бурятия


улица Комаровка
Александровка
Самарская область


улица Комаровка
Беково
Пензенская область


улица Комаровка
Высокая Гора
Республика Татарстан


улица Комаровка
Загоскино
Пензенская область


улица Комаровка
Куракино
Пензенская область


улица Комаровка
Лава
Ульяновская область


улица Комаровка
Лекарево
Республика Татарстан


улица Комаровка
Шишкеево
Республика Мордовия


улица Комаровка
Сузунский район
Новосибирская область


улица Комаровка
Тевризский район
Омская область


улица Комаровка
Ивановка
Тюменская область


улица Комаровка
Алексеевка
Белгородская область


улица Комаровка
Гринёво
Брянская область


улица Комаровка
Давыдово
Тамбовская область


улица Комаровка
Ивановское
Курская область


улица Комаровка
Королёв
Москва и Московская область


улица Комаровка
Новоусманский район
Воронежская область


улица Комаровка
Пеньки
Тамбовская область


улица Комаровка
Новодмитриевский
Ростовская область


улица Мошки
Михайловка
Самарская область


улица Мухина Балка
Аксай
Ростовская область



Hymenoptera: 58 streets


StreetMunicipalityRegion


Муравейная улица
Городской округ Райчихинск
Амурская область


Муравьёвская улица
Корсаков
Сахалинская область


Муравьёвская улица
Петровск-Забайкальский
Забайкальский край


Муравьёвская улица
Савинское сельское поселение
Новгородская область


Муравьёвская улица
Конаково
Тверская область


Муравьёвский переулок
Кимры
Тверская область


Новомуравьевская улица
Саратов
Саратовская область


переулок Муравей
Карлыханово
Республика Башкортостан


переулок Пчёлка
Черниговка
Приморский край


переулок Пчёлка
Михайловка
Оренбургская область


проезд Шершнёвский Бор
Челябинск
Челябинская область


Пчелиная улица
Санболи
Хабаровский край


Пчелиная улица
Городской округ Бор
Нижегородская область


Пчелиная улица
Лысьва
Пермский край


Пчелиная улица
Пермь
Пермский край


Пчелиная улица
Сердобск
Пензенская область


Пчелиная улица
Энгельсский район
Саратовская область


Пчелиная улица
Кисловодск
Ставропольский край


Пчелиная улица
Маркова
Иркутская область


Пчелиная улица
Ушаковское сельское поселение
Иркутская область


Пчелиная улица
Челябинск
Челябинская область


Пчелиная улица
Городской округ Геленджик
Краснодарский край


Пчелиная улица
Краснодар
Краснодарский край


Пчелиная улица
Перовское сельское поселение
Республика Крым


Пчелиная улица
Рассветовское сельское поселение
Ростовская область


Пчелиный переулок
Забайкальский
Забайкальский край


Пчелиный переулок
Михайловский сельсовет
Республика Башкортостан


Пчелиный переулок
Аннинское городское поселение
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


Пчелиный переулок
Маркова
Иркутская область


Пчелиный переулок
Междуреченск
Кемеровская область (Кузбасс)


Пчелиный переулок
Сосновский район
Челябинская область


Пчелиный переулок
Воронеж
Воронежская область


Пчелиный переулок
Степаньково
Москва и Московская область


Пчелиный переулок
Ростов-на-Дону
Ростовская область


Пчелиный переулок
Сочи
Краснодарский край


Пчелиный проезд
Калининград
Калининградская область


Пчелиный тупик
Первомайский район
Алтайский край


Пчелиный тупик
Городской округ Истра
Москва и Московская область


Пчелиный тупик
Судогодский район
Владимирская область


Пчёлкин переулок
Одинцовский район
Москва и Московская область


Пчеловская улица
Красный Гуляй
Ульяновская область


Пчельный переулок
Ногинск
Москва и Московская область


Трутневская улица
Красная Горка
Ярославская область


улица Муравьёвка
Городской округ Новомосковск
Тульская область


улица Муравьёвский тракт
Ржев
Тверская область


улица Муравьи
Савинское сельское поселение
Новгородская область


улица Муравьиная Бухта
Артёмовский городской округ
Приморский край


улица Пролёт Шмеля
Городской округ Серпухов
Москва и Московская область


улица Пчелка
Златоустовский городской округ
Челябинская область


улица Пчёлка
Болотовские Дворы
Орловская область


улица Пчёлка
Гвазда
Воронежская область


улица Пчёлка-1
Хабаровск
Хабаровский край


улица Пчельный
Речица
Курская область


улица Трудовая Пчела
Ижевск
Удмуртская Республика


Шершнёвская улица
Челябинск
Челябинская область


Шмелёвская улица
Адышево
Кировская область


Шмелиная улица
Казань
Республика Татарстан


Шмелиная улица
Энгельсский район
Саратовская область



Coleoptera: 19 streets


StreetMunicipalityRegion


Жужелинская улица
Кострома
Костромская область


Жуков переулок
Сестрорецк
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


Жуков проезд
Москва
Москва и Московская область


Жучиный переулок
Солнечногорский район
Москва и Московская область


Светлячковая улица
Городской округ Геленджик
Краснодарский край


Светлячковый проезд
Городской округ Шаховская
Москва и Московская область


улица Божьей Коровки
Иваньковское сельское поселение
Тульская область


улица Жука
Посёлок имени Морозова
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


улица Жука
Шлиссельбург
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


улица Жука
Приближная
Кабардино-Балкарская Республика


улица Жукова Гора
Егорьевск
Москва и Московская область


улица Жукова Гора
Гуселское сельское поселение
Волгоградская область


улица Жуковка
Казань
Республика Татарстан


улица Жуковка
Пушкино
Республика Мордовия


улица Жуковка
Старая Толковка
Пензенская область


улица Жуковка
Лампово
Санкт-Петербург и Ленинградская область


улица Жуковка
Русско-Полянский район
Омская область


улица Жуковка
Ивановка
Курская область


улица Жуково
Бековский район
Пензенская область



Lepidoptera: 5 streets


StreetMunicipalityRegion


Гусеничный переулок*
Тула
Тульская область


Мотылевая улица
Железногорск
Красноярский край


Мотыльковая улица
Завьялово
Удмуртская Республика


Мотыльковая улица
Новоталицкое сельское поселение
Ивановская область


Шелкопрядная улица
Грозный
Чеченская Республика



Blattodea: 4 streets


StreetMunicipalityRegion


Таракановское шоссе
Толстяково
Москва и Московская область


Термитный переулок
Воскресенск
Москва и Московская область


улица Верхняя Таракановка
Казачья Слобода
Рязанская область


улица Нижняя Таракановка
Казачья Слобода
Рязанская область



Orthoptera: 3 streets


StreetMunicipalityRegion


Медведковская улица*
Зеленоград
Москва и Московская область


Сверчков переулок
Москва
Москва и Московская область


улица Кузнечиха*
Сормовка
Нижегородская область



Hemiptera: 1 street


StreetMunicipalityRegion


улица Цикад
Плотниковский сельсовет
Новосибирская область



Psocodea: 1 street


StreetMunicipalityRegion


улица Вшивовка
Архангельское
Липецкая область



* Streets added by the author of the post.

Well, and there is some popular in USSR song for mosquito-named town.


Thanks to Yandex guys and gals for the study and expanded information about insect street names.

26.05.2023 22:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lytta Lytta caraganae.

26.05.2023 15:28, Vera Volkotrub:

Lytta caraganae

22.05.2023 20:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pygodasis ephippium.

20.05.2023 13:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Chalcosiinae.

15.05.2023 20:38, Peter Khramov:

According to email comment by Dmitriy.

15.05.2023 20:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius tianschanicus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.05.2023 20:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius tianschanicus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

10.05.2023 22:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 22:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pristiphora insularis / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 22:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 21:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / .

10.05.2023 21:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexander Boldyrev.

10.05.2023 21:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 21:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhogogaster scalaris / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

10.05.2023 0:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cryptorhynchini Colobodes billbergii.

10.05.2023 0:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Ornithospila succincta Colobodes billbergii.

04.05.2023 20:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Argynnis paphia / Ekaterina Poborskaia Argynnis pandora / Fyodor Pudovikov.

04.05.2023 20:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Caradrina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov Caradrina terrea / Tentatively identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

04.05.2023 20:35, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Parnassius / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Bochkov Parnassius nordmanni thomai / Tentatively identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

04.05.2023 20:34, Peter Khramov:

In conformity with #52298 photo comment.

04.05.2023 20:33, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Gonepteryx rhamni / Confidently identified Gonepteryx farinosa / Tentatively identified.

04.05.2023 20:33, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Gonepteryx rhamni / Confidently identified Gonepteryx farinosa / Tentatively identified.

02.05.2023 22:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Machilidae.

02.05.2023 22:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bembidion biguttatus / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

02.05.2023 22:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bembidion biguttatus / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

02.05.2023 22:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bembidion biguttatus / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

02.05.2023 22:34, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Castanopsides potanini / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub.

02.05.2023 17:07, Peter Khramov:

To clarify the species, we are waiting for the curator's comments.

02.05.2023 17:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ophthalmoblysis / Confidently identified / Konstantin Kraevsky.

02.05.2023 17:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polistichus connexus / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

02.05.2023 16:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthogaleruca luteola / Confidently identified / Alexandra Lisitsyna.

02.05.2023 14:17, Peter Khramov:

The curators are kindly requested to add the new view to the database.

02.05.2023 14:15, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmosoma / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

02.05.2023 14:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Megachile / Tentatively identified / Galgo Dela.

02.05.2023 14:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Megachile / Tentatively identified / Galgo Dela.

02.05.2023 14:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema leuce / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

02.05.2023 13:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apogonia / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov.

02.05.2023 13:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apogonia / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov.

02.05.2023 13:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apogonia / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov.

02.05.2023 13:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apogonia / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov.

01.05.2023 22:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Megacyllene nebulosa / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

01.05.2023 22:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina reitteri Chrysolina pseudolurida.

01.05.2023 22:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina reitteri Chrysolina pseudolurida.

01.05.2023 20:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

01.05.2023 20:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

01.05.2023 20:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cimbicinae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

01.05.2023 20:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Utetheisa ornatrix / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ophisma tropicalis / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melipotis fasciolaris / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gonepteryx rhamni / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

01.05.2023 20:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia orithya / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrausta aurata / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:15, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Angerona prunaria / Confidently identified / Female / Eddy Verfaillie.

01.05.2023 20:15, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Decticus verrucivorus / Tentatively identified / Peter Khramov.

01.05.2023 20:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chinavia / Tentatively identified / Galgo Dela.

01.05.2023 20:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedriodiscus / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

01.05.2023 20:06, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, is this a comment on what identification?

01.05.2023 20:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siona lineata / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

01.05.2023 20:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siona lineata / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

01.05.2023 20:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma lutea / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

01.05.2023 20:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Astylus atromaculatus / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

01.05.2023 20:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Astylus atromaculatus / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

01.05.2023 19:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Phrygionis privignaria.

01.05.2023 19:19, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Karla Schineider.

01.05.2023 19:15, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteropterus morpheus / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

28.04.2023 23:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Orthospila orissusalis.

28.04.2023 14:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euura hypoxantha / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

22.04.2023 18:35, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Alcides karelinii Alcidodes karelinii.

22.04.2023 18:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

22.04.2023 18:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrhoe tristata / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

22.04.2023 18:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthia icteritia / Confidently identified / Alex Mesiats.

22.04.2023 18:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrhoe alternata / Tentatively identified / Alex Mesiats.

22.04.2023 18:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleora cinctaria / Confidently identified / Alex Mesiats.

22.04.2023 18:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Thymelicus Thymelicus sylvestris.

22.04.2023 18:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Argynnis adippe / Yuriy Karpov Argynnis aglaja / Marat Migranov.

22.04.2023 18:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Argynnis adippe / Sergei Kotov Argynnis aglaja / Marat Migranov.

22.04.2023 16:55, Peter Khramov:

There was a problem with autosuggestions engine but it\\\\\\\'s solved now. The taxa search through all the website (including images uploading and taxa linking) is fully-functioning now. If you still have problems with autosuggestions — just press Ctrl+F5 to reload the webpage without the cash data.

13.04.2023 21:26, Peter Khramov:

To see at least a shaded map click Ok at Google message over the map block.

26.03.2023 23:45, Peter Khramov:

If your file is less than 5 MB but you get upload error — try to make the file size even less. It\\\'s temporary but and we\\\'ll fix it but in the meantime...

20.02.2023 23:53, Peter Khramov:

We have comment from email: It is a Gonocerus acuteangulatus. It is not an Haploprocta sulcicornis. Look the edge of the neck : on your picture it has the same color than the pronotum: this would not be the case it it was an Haploprocta sulcicornis.

20.02.2023 22:35, Peter Khramov:

---

26.01.2023 18:46, Yuriy Karpov:

Siona lineata Scopoli, 1763

26.01.2023 18:45, Yuriy Karpov:

Siona lineata Scopoli, 1763

26.01.2023 18:16, Yuriy Karpov:

Spilosoma lutea

24.01.2023 19:30, Yuriy Karpov:

Ophiogomphus spinicomis.

24.01.2023 19:28, Yuriy Karpov:

Somatochiora arctica

24.01.2023 19:27, Yuriy Karpov:

Somatochiora arctica

24.01.2023 19:27, Yuriy Karpov:

Somatochiora arctica

24.01.2023 18:52, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

20.01.2023 6:18, Owl Soul:

Yes, how to edit it here... It's just Hello! then :)

20.01.2023 6:10, Owl Soul:

I suddenly remembered that "exotic" pets live at my house, and now not only in the bathroom, This is NOT a flycatcher, I know these lovely creatures and we do not have them. The size of the specimen is about two centimeters, a thin, grayish thread with light brown paws. Quite calm, but there will still be no photo, I was not up to that. Can anyone tell me what species are found in the pine and cedar forests of the north? Where to dig? And then there is a pet, but there is no name, and this is a mess :)

17.01.2023 11:32, Insect forum:

I’ll answer my own question. This is a predatory bug
https://imageup.ru/img15/4167793/klop-khishchnets.png

17.01.2023 10:33, Insect forum:

I will duplicate the photos with direct links:
https://imageup.ru/img44/4167751/insect_1.jpg.html
https://imageup.ru/img271/4167752/insect_2.jpg.html

17.01.2023 10:32, Insect forum:

Hello.
Please tell me, what species of insect did I find in the house?
My search did not bring results.
The trunk is about 6 millimeters, six legs, a long proboscis.

Insect photos:

31.12.2022 8:59, Dmitrii Michailov: This species is identified correctly.

25.11.2022 23:37, Sabine Gasparitz:

Hello Zoran, this is a male of Heliomata glarearia
Kind regards Sabine

13.09.2022 18:58, Yana Manion:

The sample is not Platypezidae sp. Probably it is Tachinidae sp.

06.09.2022 8:47, Artem Bobkov:

I didn't take a picture, so I'll describe it: his size is about like a bumblebee, his head looks like the head of a fly and with the same "tongue" that it feeds on, the color is a little yellowish, the head is small relative to the size of the body, and the "butt" is large, we can say that the body from the beginning it resembles the shape of a cone to the end.

27.08.2022 16:31, Ivan Tislenko:

There http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=275983&st=350 they may be interested.

19.08.2022 22:19, Vera U:

An insect was accidentally found, out of curiosity, the species was determined from the photo. According to Wikipedia, it is listed in the Red Book, category 1 (endangered), it was last registered in 1959, and it has never been found in our region before. Someone may be interested in this fact? Identified as Bradyporus multituberculatus.

18.08.2022 11:34, Yana Golyanova:

19.07.2022 22:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Polydrusus cervinus.

19.07.2022 22:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Polydrusus cervinus.

17.07.2022 14:18, Peter Khramov:

According to the comment on the Cucujus cinnaberinus page.

17.07.2022 14:18, Peter Khramov:

According to the comment on the Cucujus cinnaberinus page.

17.07.2022 14:18, Peter Khramov:

According to the comment on the Cucujus cinnaberinus page.

17.07.2022 14:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cucujus cinnaberinus Cucujus haematodes.

17.07.2022 14:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cucujus cinnaberinus Cucujus haematodes.

17.07.2022 14:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cucujus cinnaberinus Cucujus haematodes.

15.07.2022 18:38, Peter Khramov:

Thanks! The location is quite interesting.

02.07.2022 16:05, Daniil Daniil:

Good afternoon. Please help me determine the species of beetle, I suspect that it's Ergates pauper, but there are some doubts. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ZBa3IvnPahH3V8XoRHRiWFIBuFmtQvhD/view?usp=sharing.

16.06.2022 7:44, Vladimir Deryabin:

Epirrhoe tristata?

24.05.2022 14:11, Alex Mesiats: This species is identified correctly.

23.05.2022 18:02, Alex Mesiats:

Epirrhoe alternata (Muller, 1764)?

23.05.2022 17:52, Alex Mesiats:

Xanthia (Cirrhia) icteritia (Hufnagel, 1766)

23.05.2022 17:45, Alex Mesiats:

Cleora cinctaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

07.05.2022 13:11, Viktoriya Sivokon:

I didn't really understand how to upload photo to discussions, but there is a photo on the sebsite uploaded through my personal account. Or here is a link to Yandex disk https://disk .yandex.ru/i/T7-XvilZXHRBiw

07.05.2022 13:08, Viktoriya Sivokon:

07.05.2022 12:59, Viktoriya Sivokon:

Hello, please help me determine the family of the insects. I am writing a diploma and the deadlines are tight (
This miracle was caught in the Rostov region in the Myasnikovsky district, in August last year on rotting meat.
Thank you very much in advance

04.11.2021 15:08, Irek Yusupov:

cf. sylvestris
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/28547587

31.10.2021 10:49, Marat Migranov:

The identification is incorrect. This is a photo of Argynnis (Speyeria) aglaja (Linnaeus, 1758).

31.10.2021 10:43, Marat Migranov:

The identification is incorrect. This is Argynnis (Speyeria) aglaja (Linnaeus, 1758).

27.10.2021 21:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 21:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 21:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 21:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 21:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 21:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 21:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 21:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 21:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heterarthrus ochropoda Heterarthrus fasciatus.

27.10.2021 13:23, Peter Khramov:

Tom, imago = adult insect :--)

20.10.2021 23:00, tom riggle: This species is identified correctly.

20.10.2021 12:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rivula sericealis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2021 10:23, Manuel Moro: This species is identified correctly.

25.09.2021 20:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Euploea midamus / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin Euploea modesta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.09.2021 20:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Euploea midamus / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin Euploea modesta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.09.2021 17:34, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Caradrina terrea (tentatively). Identified by Balàzs Benedek

21.09.2021 13:55, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Argynnis pandora.

14.09.2021 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Yesterday and today there was a technical problem with the website database. It's been fixed now. If you see glitches, do not hesitate to call / write me.

31.08.2021 8:50, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Что-то опять с сайтом случилось. Не отвечает. Пишет не найдена страница

17.08.2021 20:48, Darya Kuzmuk:

Please tell me the species of grasshopper.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gIg_-Nb9DhahFUZm8NWgwfEZhkrVlWxn/view?usp=sharing

13.08.2021 13:14, Peter Khramov:

Nikolai, send me the files that you are uploading to editor#insecta.pro (a dog instead of a bug). I'll check it out.

13.08.2021 13:13, Peter Khramov:

Good afternoon. At the top of any page (when you are in your account) there is a link "Upload to the site". Fill in the fields, select the photo file and upload it.

10.08.2021 10:22, Anton Gjeldum: This species is identified correctly.

03.08.2021 16:45, Alex B:

But I didn't understand how to upload a photo...

03.08.2021 16:43, Alex B:

Is it a wild bee or a wild bumblebee? It's buzzing and does not resemble behavior of an ordinary bee

01.08.2021 15:05, Aza Potieva: This species is identified correctly.

10.07.2021 8:08, Nikolay Vinogradov:

I can't upload photo Archives and photos one by one.
When I try to upload the archive - judging by the traffic, sending to the site occurs in full, but photos do not get into the photogallery.
I'm trying to upload one at a time: the first photo is being uploaded. The next time you try, you get the message "Fill the "File" field.
The archive size is 15.3 MB, the size of an individual photo is 2.6 MB.
I tried Firefox 89.0.2 (64-bit), Google Chrome Version 73.0.3683.103 (Official build), (64-bit), Opera Version:77.0.4054.203.

10.07.2021 7:42, Vladimir Deryabin: This species is identified correctly.

10.07.2021 7:41, Vladimir Deryabin: This species is identified correctly.

09.07.2021 4:54, Max Gregor:

Please tell me the species of insect. The size is not more than 0.5 mm. Found in a parrot cage.

07.07.2021 20:48, Antonio Banderas:

07.07.2021 20:41, Antonio Banderas:

Good day to all of you!
Please tell me the name of the butterfly in the photo below. Photographed in a Caucasus in North Ossetia

18.06.2021 0:23, irina pavlova:

Hello! Please tell me how you can temporarily put an insect to sleep? I'm being honest, it's for Sanitary & Epidemiological Station. The fact is that mom got fleas, (the dog brought), ten treatments all meaningless. And in the only state Sanitary & Epidemiological Station, entomologists, must decompose the collected fleas into flasks with poisons, and for this the fleas must be euthanized, but not killed. THEY DON'T KNOW HOW! They do not sleep from small doses of ether, they die from large doses. How much ether to pour on cotton wool, based on the aquarium and how much cotton wool to keep, has become a problem equal to the search for a perpetual motion machine! They can't find it anywhere. Maybe you can tell me? If you can, please help!

06.06.2021 18:59, Igor Ivannikov: This species is identified correctly.

06.06.2021 11:20, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Are you planning to switch from http to https? And then with the innovations in almost all browsers on sites with encryption, it is impossible to show a photo from your website.

05.06.2021 7:51, Satoru Saitoh:

This is Chrysolina graminis ssp. auralia, which is distributed in from Korean peninsula to Amur district (but not in JAPAN >

05.06.2021 7:45, Satoru Saitoh:

This is Chrysolina (Euchrysolina) virgata. Please refer Bienkowski (2019) \"Chrysolina of the world\".

04.06.2021 15:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea modesta modesta Butler,1866

30.05.2021 21:53, Kseniya Trofimova:

When uploading a photo, the website's message is "fill in the "file" field", although the photo is selected.

17.05.2021 10:32, Haseon Jang:

Nemophora lapikella?

15.05.2021 18:21, Julia Antonova:

Please help me to identify the insect. It appeared last summer on the balcony. With the onset of cold weather it disappeared, but with the arrival of heat it reappeared and now it has moved to the kitchen. There are a lot of small dark bugs, very fast (they don't fly, but they seem to bounce when trying to catch) They huddle together, but they also run separately. With antennas. Today for the first time I saw adult photos that I was able to photograph. No chemical funds seem to be working. Panic!!!!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XVyE7_Mozd...iew?usp=sharing

22.04.2021 7:04, Vera Volkotrub:

The baiting of the entire apartment building helps, in a single apartment, in addition to baiting, repairs with filling the floor and sealing all the cracks, a grid for ventilation holes, sockets (if it is a panel house).

11.04.2021 13:12, Igor Ivannikov:

Most likely it is a male Goonepteryx farinoza Zeller, 1847.

01.04.2021 15:38, Bob McCall:

looks like Campsomeriella collaris

31.03.2021 9:33, Tatyana Tatyana:

Good afternoon, dear entomologists! The question is probably not really for this website. Sorry. But I so need advice from professionals! After all, you, like no one else, can prompt information about an insect. Specifically a cockroach. What they are afraid of, how to get rid of them, there is no strength. We tried all the new-fangled means, including three times we called disinfectants (treated the basement, corridor, apartments), but all to no avail, after a while they climb again. Tell me, please, is it possible to get rid of them at all in a separate apartment in an apartment building? As I read, they quickly adapt to any poisons. Maybe there is some kind of remedy that can get rid of them forever? Thank you very much for any information!!

22.03.2021 2:57, Karla Schineider: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2021 2:56, Karla Schineider: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2021 2:54, Karla Schineider: This species is identified correctly.

21.03.2021 8:30, Karla Schineider: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2021 11:33, Fyodor Pudovikov:

nordmanni

02.03.2021 8:16, Fyodor Pudovikov:

lonicerae

26.02.2021 12:06, Fyodor Pudovikov:

lineola

18.02.2021 16:00, Peter Khramov:

Most of it has been fixed, there may still be some errors in the taxa tree, we are checking it now.

18.02.2021 15:30, Peter Khramov:

Guys, if such glitches happen, I ask you to write directly to the mail editor@insecta.pro. I will try to fix the error soon.

16.02.2021 9:14, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Apparently the end has come to the website

12.02.2021 22:34, Alexander Korolev:

What happened to the website? Nothing is working. Everything is gone.

11.02.2021 19:37, Yuriy Karpov:

Peter. The website does not work completely, I cannot launch any functions, the photo does not show at all, I tried both the search for the name and classification.

02.02.2021 13:40, Svetlana Shchavelina:

... and where did the website administration go anyway??? Ow! There is no one.....

31.01.2021 16:05, Nikolay Grebennikov:

And why is the website not working again? An error.

06.01.2021 19:22, Alexander Korolev:

Nikolaev G.V. Additional data on species of the subgenus Thorectomimus Nikolajev of the genus Odontotrypes Fairmaire (Coleoptera, Geotrupidae).
Additional data on the subgenus Thorectomimus Nikolajev of the genus Odontotrypes Fairmaire (Coleoptera, Geotrupidae) // Евразиатский энтомол. журнал 12(4). 2013: 355–357.

23.12.2020 19:04, Constantin Rogozin:

Hello.
Please tell me which of the insects or worms can eat 1500 tons of sawdust and wood chips mixed with loam? I would like to get compost or lawn soil that way. Only it is necessary that they do not devour the whole city later, when they breed. :)
Maybe there is some kind of specialized culture capable of processing wood waste, the cultivation of which on a huge scale will not lead to imprisonment under the article "bioTerrorism" and will not destroy civilization in a particular area ...
The climate is probably closer to cold.

23.12.2020 13:20, Tim Stratford: This species is identified correctly.

11.12.2020 13:47, Alexandr Karpenko:

I want to apologize if I created a topic not in the appropriate section, but I really need help.
About two weeks ago we found insects (see pictures) in small numbers, we thought they would stay a little bit and fly away.

But yesterday, as it turned out, about 300 of these specimen were killed, but they settled on the loggia (in the common room, on flowers, in clothes in boxes, just on the walls).

Today I have already killed about 50 of these insects, and it seems to me that they breed exponentially.

Please tell me, what kind of insects are these and how to fight them?





09.12.2020 22:29, Svetlana Shchavelina:

I discovered on the Internet that it is Achelura sp. (Chalcosiinae, Zygaenidae). But have Achelura here - I didn't find it.......

25.11.2020 17:34, Sergey Lakhtarin:

Good afternoon.

a few days ago, in the kitchen on the ceiling, I began to notice such illegal residents. The length is about 2 cm . I shoot 5-7 pieces every day. Please help me identify him. I live in the Krasnodar region.

22.11.2020 10:44, Andrey Ponomarev:

Bembidion biguttatum (Fabricius, 1779). Can't find among the website taxa.

21.11.2020 15:36, Andrey Ponomarev:

Pristiphora insularis (Rohwer, 1910), not listed in the website taxa tree.

18.11.2020 5:54, Vera Volkotrub:

Hydrochara affinis, det. gijwans, Stanislav Litovkin.

09.11.2020 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.11.2020 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae Cyaniris semiargus.

09.11.2020 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.11.2020 10:58, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

04.11.2020 10:58, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2020 19:54, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2020 19:54, Stan Korb:

Yes, semiargus

28.10.2020 11:03, Mihail Nyzhnikov:

It's Hierodula tenuidentata

16.10.2020 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Therinia Therinia transversaria.

16.10.2020 11:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Therinia / Confidently identified / Konstantin Kraevsky.

16.10.2020 11:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius apollo merzbacheri / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

16.10.2020 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Parnassius apollo Parnassius apollo merzbacheri.

16.10.2020 11:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius apollo / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

16.10.2020 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zerynthia louristana / Confidently identified / Otto Feldner.

16.10.2020 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Parnassius apollonius aphrodite.

16.10.2020 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

08.10.2020 19:48, Eddy Verfaillie:

Angerona prunaria, female.

07.10.2020 16:19, Eddy Verfaillie:

Dysphania snelleni, or Dysphania latiflava

07.10.2020 15:36, Eddy Verfaillie:

Celaenorrhinus fritzgaertneri

07.10.2020 15:16, Eddy Verfaillie:

Incorrect identification. It is Automeris hamata (Schaus 1906).

07.10.2020 14:57, Eddy Verfaillie:

Ophisma tropicalis

07.10.2020 14:50, Eddy Verfaillie:

Melipotis fasciolaris

07.10.2020 14:36, Eddy Verfaillie:

Utetheisa ornatrix

07.10.2020 13:31, Eddy Verfaillie: This species is identified correctly.

07.10.2020 13:09, Eddy Verfaillie:

Celastrina argiolus

07.10.2020 13:03, Eddy Verfaillie:

Lycaena phlaeas

07.10.2020 12:18, Eddy Verfaillie:

Junonia orithya. This is a migrant from Indonesia: see http://wam.ae/en/details/1395302654919.

07.10.2020 12:13, Eddy Verfaillie:

Pyrausta aurata

07.10.2020 11:43, Eddy Verfaillie:

Polyommatus damon, male

07.10.2020 11:34, Eddy Verfaillie:

Heteropterus morpheus

07.10.2020 11:31, Eddy Verfaillie: This species is identified correctly.

06.10.2020 19:47, Eddy Verfaillie:

Udea elutalis

06.10.2020 19:42, Eddy Verfaillie:

Carterocephalus silvicola

05.10.2020 17:11, Alexander Belousov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2020 20:42, Alexander Belousov:

Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus, 1758) ssp. merzbacheri Fruhstorfer, 1906. female

30.09.2020 20:41, Alexander Belousov:

Parnassius apollo (Linnaeus, 1758) ssp. merzbacheri Fruhstorfer, 1906.

30.09.2020 20:38, Alexander Belousov:

Parnassius apollonius (Eversmann, 1847) ssp. aphrodite Bryk & Eisner, 1934.

28.09.2020 13:42, Alexander Tarakanov:

Hello!
Recently I got cockroaches of this species and faced the task - how to feed them?
They don't eat:
- carrots
- apple
- a pear
- bread
- oatmeal
- cat food

I keep it in oak litter on a thermal mat, the humidity is good.

What do you feed your chess cockroaches?

24.09.2020 13:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus damone Polyommatus.

24.09.2020 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus damone Polyommatus.

24.09.2020 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cyaniris semiargus Glaucopsyche alexis.

24.09.2020 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cyaniris semiargus Glaucopsyche alexis.

24.09.2020 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely it's not Episema tersa, from the species with white wings (lederi/amasina) I guess it's Episema lederi, but maybe there is something else purely Asian.

24.09.2020 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Episema tersa / Confidently identified / Imago / Andrey Polstyanoy Episema lederi / Tentatively identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2020 19:19, Alexander Belousov:

Please, delete the identification. I was wrong.

10.09.2020 18:38, Nikolay Grebennikov:

This is Glaucopsyche alexis (Poda, 1761). Please, transfer it to this species.

31.08.2020 18:49, Nikolay Grebennikov:

It turns out that it is not in the catalog of the Russian Lepidoptera in the 2nd edition in the 17th Russian region, but in fact there it is)?

08.08.2020 8:02, Askar Isabekov:

Dear friends, could you help me to id Parnassius butterflies? Unfortunately I didn\'t find any detailed field guide of Parnassius group. In case of you know the species in photo, please write the important features which indicate to species. Thank you for help.

http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/79176
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/79172
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/79173
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/79174
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/79175

08.08.2020 7:53, Askar Isabekov:

Hello. I ask for help in identifying the Apollo butterflies. I see that they are different, but, unfortunately, I have not found a field guide anywhere, and the differences can be so insignificant that just focusing on the photos found on the Internet can probably lead to an error.

07.08.2020 5:40, Vera Volkotrub:

Eurythyrea eoa Semenov, 1895

03.08.2020 9:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is unlikely that Korb would have provided his opinion. :(, If there is something else, we will fix it.

03.08.2020 9:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cyaniris semiargus / Nikolay Grebennikov Glaucopsyche alexis / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.08.2020 9:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cyaniris semiargus / Nikolay Grebennikov Glaucopsyche alexis / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.08.2020 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Imago Cyaniris semiargus / Tentatively identified / Female.

01.08.2020 11:12, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Actually, we can wait. I also wrote to the S. Korb. Maybe he will answer.

31.07.2020 18:50, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Ok. Then move her to semiagruses).

31.07.2020 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, the female semiargus is very similar. It's like this: I haven't been using any paper literature for a long time, more websites are more usable for me. :)

31.07.2020 14:24, Nikolay Grebennikov:

According to our 17 Russian region, semiargus is Ok I was informed. But I would also like to look at Northern Kazakhstan and North-Western Kazakhstan. What kind of literature would you recommend?

31.07.2020 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

I compared here: https://www.butterfies-design.com/kopiya-cupido-decoloratus-2, obviously they are different species, and what kind of species I can't even guess, I'm not an expert on Lycaenidae.
Take 17 region, and look at all similar Lycaenidae, maybe it will pop out.

26.07.2020 21:20, Vladimir kashta:

http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/79143

26.07.2020 20:18, Vladimir kashta:

Krasnodar region, steppe zone. What kind of locusts? I just uploaded it to this site, but I don't understand how to attach it to the message, sorry.

25.07.2020 15:19, Ekaterina Nabokova:

25.07.2020 15:18, Ekaterina Nabokova:

On a beetle of the species Smaragdesthes africana smaragdina, I found this. What is this white fungus? How to avoid infecting other beetles with it?

21.07.2020 20:23, Nikolay Grebennikov:

And what does it look more like?

20.07.2020 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

In my opinion, this is not Aricia persephatta.

08.07.2020 21:16, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Aricia persephatta (Alphéraky, 1881)? Moreover, Kazakhstan is nearby here.

05.07.2020 12:10, Vladimir Deryabin:

Idaea politaria

03.07.2020 18:55, Alexander Belousov:

The absence of a red line on the abdomen is confusing. However I guess it is this species.

29.06.2020 20:09, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Is there any algorithm for identification species at such photos? Or is it unrealistic?

26.06.2020 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

A difficult case. If it was Europe, it would be a representative of the genus Crassa, most likely unitella, but this genus does not exist in the Asian part of Russia. There is another similar species in Japan, Pedioxestis isomorpha Meyrick, 1932, but it is not found in Russia.
Three possible answers:
1. Invasion of the European species on the Russian Far East.
2. A new species for Russia Pedioxestis isomorpha Meyrick, 1932
3. I missed something from the Far East Seaside fauna. :) it's probably the most faithful option.

26.06.2020 13:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Parasemia plantaginis.

26.06.2020 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.06.2020 18:21, Ivan Kozar:

Length 2-2.5 cm, backside with two horns (like crickets)!

11.06.2020 18:20, Ivan Kozar:

I have already caught a dozen of these monsters in the apartment - who is it, where can they come from and how to get rid of them. They scratch at night, on the plastic ceiling, or rather climb up the wall there, come across in the bathroom and sink every day - like they have a watering hole! It wasn't even close before, in 5 years, where they came from - it's not clear at all!

06.06.2020 10:21, AJuan Navarro : This species is identified correctly.

02.06.2020 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Manduca.

02.06.2020 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Leonid Savrasov.

02.06.2020 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula Scopula beckeraria.

02.06.2020 11:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula beckeraria Scopula.

02.06.2020 11:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

02.06.2020 11:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

28.05.2020 15:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lixus iridis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

22.05.2020 15:37, Adrian Peplak:

Sorry for digging out such an ancient thread, but I have a similar bug. I try to upload a jpg photo (4,6 MB) and I receive such a notification: Please, fill \\\"File\\\" field. Could someone take a look at it?

17.05.2020 14:50, Nikolay Troshkov:

Как удалить подтверждение? Этот вид определен неправильно.

17.05.2020 14:49, Nikolay Troshkov: This species is identified correctly.

17.05.2020 14:36, Nikolay Troshkov:

Это точно не froelichii, даже не близко. Этот жук относится к другой ветви, если смотреть по IV и V стернитам брюшка.

15.05.2020 8:03, Vladimir Deryabin: This species is identified correctly.

15.05.2020 6:43, Vladimir Deryabin:

Epicallia villica

06.05.2020 10:18, Andrey Ponomarev:

As it turned out, this is Pristiphora gerula (Konow, 1904), so this photo and the rest should be moved.
Definition by Spencer K. Monckton & Alexander Boldyrev
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/38338681

05.05.2020 22:16, Peter Khramov:

Genus level maybe?

05.05.2020 22:15, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

05.05.2020 22:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Tingidae / Yana Manion Tingis cardui / Vera Volkotrub.

05.05.2020 21:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

05.05.2020 21:56, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, do you have a link to the publication? Or at least the full output data of the publication? To add a new species.

05.05.2020 21:55, Peter Khramov:

They could have done it in the last 50 days, of course...

05.05.2020 21:54, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is already in "tentatively identification", but no other options have been indicated yet...

05.05.2020 21:53, Peter Khramov:

It is now as a subgenus of Rhogogaster at the website...

04.05.2020 17:07, Anton Alimpiev: This species is identified correctly.

28.04.2020 11:57, Andrey Ponomarev:

There are very serious doubts about the correctness of the species identification of the specimen. Pay attention to the details of the head as in the Photo #78884

26.04.2020 23:12, Carlos Mancilla: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2020 23:01, Carlos Mancilla: This species is identified correctly.

23.04.2020 16:37, Andrey Ponomarev:

Cytisogaster picta

06.04.2020 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agriphila tristella / Vlad Proklov Pediasia luteella / Niyaz Ismagilov.

06.04.2020 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agriphila tristella / Vlad Proklov Pediasia luteella / Niyaz Ismagilov.

06.04.2020 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

I identified this butterfly back in 2014, I forgot to put the name.

06.04.2020 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Acleris schalleriana / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.04.2020 22:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Adelidae / Tentatively identified / Shamil Murtazin Cauchas leucocerella / Confidently identified / Niyaz Ismagilov.

06.04.2020 22:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Scopula beckeraria / Niyaz Ismagilov.

06.04.2020 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Scopula corrivalaria / Niyaz Ismagilov.

06.04.2020 22:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acleris hastiana / Tentatively identified / Andrej Makara Acleris cristana / Confidently identified / Aleksandr Andrianov.

05.04.2020 22:10, Manuel Moro: This species is identified correctly.

05.04.2020 22:09, Manuel Moro: This species is identified correctly.

03.04.2020 23:40, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Pediasia luteella

03.04.2020 22:42, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Acleris schalleriana

03.04.2020 22:37, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Cauchas leucocerella

03.04.2020 22:34, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Scopula beckeraria (Lederer, 1853)

03.04.2020 22:33, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Scopula corrivalaria

31.03.2020 21:50, Amir Akhmetzyanov:

Yes, not for the last 50 years, as it turned out, I mixed up the century...

31.03.2020 21:49, Amir Akhmetzyanov:

Good evening! If someone knows the transfers of taxa over the past 50 years, please tell me: Bram's book contains information about Dicranorrhina smithi, a beetle that I could not find anywhere (information about it). At the same time, I found on the Internet Eudicella smithii - a beetle, which, according to the description presented in the book, is just the same insect from the book. Could a beetle have been transferred from one genus to another in the time since the book was compiled (1860)? There is another option - the Dicranorrhina smithi beetle was combined with Dicranorrhina micans. What do you think?

29.03.2020 14:55, Aleksandr Andrianov:

This is Acleris cristana

25.03.2020 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis roboraria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

25.03.2020 13:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mesapamea / Alexandr Zhakov Apamea oblonga / Shamil Murtazin.

24.03.2020 16:50, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Apamea oblonga

23.03.2020 13:46, Basil Sergienko:

Hypomecis roboraria - local subspecies

11.03.2020 0:18, Alexander Korolev:

Species - Odontotrypes korolevi Nikolajev, 2013

11.03.2020 0:17, Alexander Korolev: This species is identified correctly.

10.03.2020 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea deversaria / Irina Nikulina Idaea biselata / Basil Sergienko.

08.03.2020 9:36, Basil Sergienko:

This is Idaea biselata

25.02.2020 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Vladimir Bobow Cimbicidae / Shamil Murtazin.

24.02.2020 22:19, Alexander Korolev: This species is identified correctly.

24.02.2020 22:01, Shamil Murtazin:

It's probably Cimbicidae

21.02.2020 11:09, Peter Khramov:

OK, I see. Keep in mind: the photos will be deleted within a couple of days. I understand that it is a free license, but nevertheless. Only the author's pictures can be uploaded here.

20.02.2020 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

The angle is like this.

20.02.2020 6:19, Maksimus Petrov:

It is not like the other photos

19.02.2020 10:56, Maksimus Petrov:

They are made not by me (they are partly cut off by me and unfolded so that the head looks up), but they have it on their website that they are distributed without a license. And my other photos from there with the same svrystmi are shown in the description of the species and genus. Also shield socks (Cassidia) by the way.

17.02.2020 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thanks Ira. Let everything be fine with Vasily.

16.02.2020 22:25, Irina Nikulina:

-

15.02.2020 21:33, Peter Khramov:

On Insecta.pro users upload only those photos that are copyrighted to them. The pictures you posted belong not to you and they were not taken by you, right?

12.02.2020 5:15, Maksimus Petrov:

I recently added 16 photos of shield socks, I thought they would be visible in the species enumeration section, and on the species page, but they are not there, the photo was taken from inaturalist with those photos that indicated that copyrights are not specified and are not protected.

10.02.2020 23:24, Peter Khramov:

I haven't seen him for a long time either.

09.02.2020 14:47, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Oospila imula - https://leps.fieldguide.ai/figure/5da16fcd748e5b685bbe0dfe/detail?profile=figures&category=5da085683c12ef1eb2e25022

08.02.2020 15:24, Maksimus Petrov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2020 15:24, Maksimus Petrov: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2020 14:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily Feoktistov has not been heard for a very long time, is everything all right with him?

05.02.2020 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis / Aleksandr Petip Neptis sappho / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.02.2020 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

And then it like two species photos on the one species webpage.
https://hiveminer.com/Tags/mimallonidae

03.02.2020 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cicinnus joanna / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov Cicinnus unalca / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2020 16:37, Vladimir Bryukhov:

It's not Phyllobius argentatus? Phyllobius maculicornis has partially black antennae...

02.02.2020 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cicinnus joanna.

02.02.2020 1:39, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Psychocampa joanna

31.01.2020 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are 4 wings.

31.01.2020 14:07, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Ophthalmoblysis plutus (Oberthur 1916)
https://cahurel-entomologie.com/gs/index.php?id=ophthalmoblysis-opisthoxia#!prettyPhoto[ophthalmoblysis]/1/
http://v3.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=398609

30.01.2020 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Eusarca / Konstantin Kraevsky.

29.01.2020 20:51, Konstantin Kraevsky:

http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=641990 - Eusarca flexilis

29.01.2020 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xestia baja / Aleksandr Petip Helicoverpa armigera / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.01.2020 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

If the location is Russia, then this is Laothoe populi.

27.01.2020 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.01.2020 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

27.01.2020 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura intermedia Cerura vinula.

25.01.2020 17:56, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Cerura vinula. Identification by Pavel Morozov.

25.01.2020 0:28, Maxim Kuznetsov:

Good afternoon. Please help me to identify the species of the moth

24.01.2020 20:41, Alex Babanov:

There is something disturbed in the booth at work. It is big, black, with a purple tint. They fly cheerfully, emitting a low hum, similar to the sound of a large hornet flying. I Googled "black bumblebee" - it looks like "purple bumblebee". In the corner of the booth I found a pile of wood dust, butterfly wings and this shell. Does this "egg" have to do with the carpenter bumblebee? It feels like a plastic bottle. Or a broken ping pong ball. The wall thickness is like thick paper. Glossy black surface. Under the black gloss is a dark gray fibrous substance, like a very thin cardboard. Very elastic, flexible. Near the hole, you can squeeze almost 50% of the original shape - it does not crack, restores the shape almost completely. The top is neatly gnawed off, apparently in the process of the child's exit outside... I've never seen anything like it. Can you tell me?

24.01.2020 9:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phrudocentra / Confidently identified / Tatyana Gordeeva Phrudocentra neis / Tentatively identified / Konstantin Kraevsky.

22.01.2020 19:00, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Eacles silkae or Eacles fulvaster
inaturalist.org/observations/37822278#activity_identification_84532936

20.01.2020 18:38, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Phrudocentra neis
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=398528

19.01.2020 16:37, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Baecula gallopavo ?

16.01.2020 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pechipogo strigilata / Irina Nikulina.

16.01.2020 0:48, Irina Nikulina:

Pechipogo strigilata

15.01.2020 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascalapha odorata / Confidently identified / Leonid Savrasov.

15.01.2020 12:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudosphinx tetrio / Confidently identified / Leonid Savrasov.

15.01.2020 12:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudosphinx tetrio / Confidently identified / Leonid Savrasov.

15.01.2020 12:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.01.2020 12:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Leonid Savrasov.

15.01.2020 12:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Manduca rustica / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.01.2020 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Leonid Savrasov.

15.01.2020 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agrius cingulatus.

15.01.2020 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.01.2020 16:48, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Mania empedocles - https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/37313988 \
See here: Cock, M.J.W. (2016) The corkscrew moths (Lepidoptera, Geometroidea, Sematuridae) of Trinidad and Tobago. Tropical Lepidoptera Research 26(2), 101-105. https://journals.flvc.org/troplep/article/view/93272

10.01.2020 12:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ascalapha odorata

10.01.2020 12:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Manduca hannibal hannibal, for Cuba does not seem to be noted

10.01.2020 12:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pseudosphinx tetrio

10.01.2020 12:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pseudosphinx tetrio female

10.01.2020 12:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Agrius cingulata (Fabricius 1775)

10.01.2020 12:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Manduca rustica cubana (Wood, 1915)

09.01.2020 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Oiceoptoma thoracicum / Vera Volkotrub.

09.01.2020 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

09.01.2020 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

09.01.2020 9:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

09.01.2020 9:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

09.01.2020 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Paolo Mazzei Irina Nikulina.

09.01.2020 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Chionarctia nivea / Paolo Mazzei.

09.01.2020 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Chionarctia nivea / Irina Nikulina.

09.01.2020 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

09.01.2020 9:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nymphalidae / Vera Volkotrub Brenthis daphne / Yuriy Karpov.

09.01.2020 9:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nymphalidae / Vera Volkotrub Brenthis daphne / Yuriy Karpov.

09.01.2020 9:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nymphalidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Melitaea / Yuriy Karpov.

08.01.2020 12:48, Konstantin Kraevsky:

It is very likely that it is not lunus. There is a very similar species with minor differences - empedocles. And, it seems, they are not Nothus now, but Mania ...
https://journals.flvc.org/troplep/article/view/93272

08.01.2020 0:58, Irina Nikulina:

Spilarctia seriatopunctata

08.01.2020 0:33, Irina Nikulina:

Cupido argiades

08.01.2020 0:25, Irina Nikulina:

Timandra sp. I won't risk to identify to the species. More info: https://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/33022

08.01.2020 0:19, Irina Nikulina:

Chionarctia nivea

06.01.2020 18:27, Yuriy Karpov:

Brenthis daphne.

06.01.2020 18:27, Yuriy Karpov:

Brenthis daphne.

06.01.2020 18:17, Yuriy Karpov:

Boloria selene, male.

06.01.2020 18:06, Yuriy Karpov:

Probably Melitaea phoebe, the genus is definitely Melitaea.

04.01.2020 16:45, Vera Volkotrub:

Oiceoptoma thoracicum (Linnaeus, 1758) http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/997148

04.01.2020 16:31, Guntram Hufler:

I cannot believe so this beatle in a Leptura aethiops. L. aethiops is completely black!

02.01.2020 11:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phycita coronatella Phycita poteriella.

28.12.2019 0:56, Aleksandr Andrianov:

This photo needs to be moved to Phycita poteriella

26.12.2019 17:56, Basil Sergienko:

Somehow I doubt this one very much, it seems like tristata, in the other photo it seems like hastulata

25.12.2019 11:44, Veliar Zarr:

Something confuses me about the presence of 7 spots in this photo. It is rather similar to Coccinella magnifica. However, I am not an expert in them.

30.11.2019 15:26, Zoran Bozovic:

I would like to see Your comment, please!

30.11.2019 15:25, Zoran Bozovic:

Only in USD!
This is Coleophora dignella.
Who is checking our proposals ???????????????

28.11.2019 16:46, Zoran Bozovic:

Can somebody confirm this Id, please!
Zoran

17.11.2019 1:05, Kjeld Brem:

Should this realle be gnoma? - normally living on Birch. I see this leaf more as a Populus tremula and the larva more as P. tremula? - Is it breeded?

Kind regards from Kjeld Brem

16.11.2019 16:14, Vera Volkotrub:

Tingis cardui

15.11.2019 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anania perlucidalis Pleuroptya ruralis.

15.11.2019 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

15.11.2019 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

15.11.2019 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

15.11.2019 13:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula floslactata / Vladimir Bryukhov Idaea pallidata / Basil Sergienko.

15.11.2019 13:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula floslactata / Vladimir Bryukhov Idaea pallidata / Basil Sergienko.

13.11.2019 19:36, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Please, move it Pleuroptya ruralis (Real binomial name is Patania ruralis) https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/35640567

10.11.2019 19:06, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Please, move it to Scopula virgulata

10.11.2019 13:48, Vladimir Bryukhov:

In favor of your version, Gramineae, Inula, Carex are food plants, the moth was photographed on a peat bog, where all these plants take place, except that I did not meet a scabwort there. What corrivalaria feeds on, I do not know.
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/35519219

10.11.2019 13:29, Basil Sergienko:

It is not corrivalaria for certain. I think it is such an interesting Scopula virgulata

10.11.2019 12:27, Vladimir Bryukhov:

That's right, move it.

09.11.2019 10:05, Basil Sergienko:

Actually, it is a female Idaea pallidata, in my opinion

29.10.2019 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula / Irek Yusupov Scopula floslactata / Basil Sergienko.

29.10.2019 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula Scopula floslactata.

29.10.2019 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Basil Sergienko.

29.10.2019 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Tentatively identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

27.10.2019 8:47, Basil Sergienko:

It's definitely not nigropunctata, it's most likely S. floslactata

27.10.2019 8:39, Basil Sergienko:

this is a female Scopula floslactata

10.10.2019 14:24, Zoran Bozovic:

Oxyptilus Tristis !!!!!

08.10.2019 21:49, Galgo Dela: This species is identified correctly.

01.10.2019 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

01.10.2019 15:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

01.10.2019 15:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

26.09.2019 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Leucodonta bicoloria

25.09.2019 12:46, Zoran Bozovic:

I think, Sorhagenia janiszewskae See new one, Sorhagenia janiszewskae DSC_7794

24.09.2019 14:01, Vera Volkotrub:

Irina, thank you very much for the identifications

23.09.2019 15:41, Irina Nikulina:

Spilarctia seriatopunctata

18.09.2019 11:29, Peter Khramov:

-

18.09.2019 10:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Scythris / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.09.2019 12:56, Zoran Bozovic:

Stigmella basiguttella !!!

02.09.2019 18:22, Zoran Bozovic:

Is this Id accepted?

27.08.2019 22:29, Irina Nikulina:

Acleris aurichalcana

25.08.2019 20:03, Alex Jones:

25.08.2019 20:02, Alex Jones:

25.08.2019 20:02, Alex Jones:

25.08.2019 20:01, Alex Jones:

>>>>

19.08.2019 10:17, Irina Nikulina:

Olethreutes captiosanus. Explanation here: https://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55604

16.08.2019 12:28, Ivan Milosrdsky:




16.08.2019 12:23, Ivan Milosrdsky:

>>>>

14.08.2019 14:12, Oleg Drujinin:

Good afternoon!
I found a dark-colored bug on the table at home, I looked at the pictures on the Internet - I still didn't understand what species it could be.
Can anyone help?

05.08.2019 13:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Irina Ignatova Apamea lateritia / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.07.2019 11:52, Sergey Zloy:

>>>>

07.07.2019 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Denis confirmed that he was wrong.

02.07.2019 16:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Libelloides macaronius / Confidently identified / Guntram Hufler.

02.07.2019 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia Eupithecia succenturiata.

01.07.2019 12:24, Vladimir Bryukhov:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Eupithecia_Succenturiata

27.06.2019 7:22, Yuri Rogozin:

Incorrect identification. This is Prosopocoilus mysticus ssp. khooi

25.06.2019 21:37, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Cimbex sp. (Cimbicidae)

25.06.2019 21:31, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Cimbex sp. (Cimbicidae)

24.06.2019 12:44, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

23.06.2019 5:36, Viktor Kolesnikov: This species is identified correctly.

22.06.2019 10:47, Guntram Hufler:

I think it\'s Libelloides macaronius (SCOPOLI, 1763)
b.r. Guntram

16.06.2019 13:42, Vladimir Bryukhov:

"cf. Achaius oratorius" - A. Humala.

07.06.2019 11:16, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Well, clearly). The size was not specified and the scales were misleading.

07.06.2019 11:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nikolay, Eriocrania salopiella is a tiny butterfly, and this is a rather large Microlepidoptera. Blue scales are misleading, I have never seen them on this species. :)

07.06.2019 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ematurga atomaria / Confidently identified / Male / Nikolay Grebennikov.

07.06.2019 10:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euplocamus anthracinalis / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.06.2019 8:40, Nikolay Grebennikov:

The picture is not too clear and it's too heavily retouched in my opinion, but I guess it's Eriocrania salopiella (STAINTON, 1854) (tentatively).

07.06.2019 6:50, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Apparently Ematurga atomaria (Linnaeus, 1758).

04.06.2019 8:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera / Eugene Davkaev Coreidae / Nikolai Vladimirov.

04.06.2019 8:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Mirina christophi / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2019 8:59, Peter Khramov:

Dear sirs and madams! If you uploaded any photos from 29 to 31 of May, 2019 and you can\'t find them at the website now, please, upload them once more. It seems like there were some losses in that department while changing hosting servers. I\'m sorry for the inconvenience.

03.06.2019 8:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

18.05.2019 2:46, Galgo Dela: This species is identified correctly.

17.05.2019 22:19, Irina Nikulina:



Mirina christophi

16.04.2019 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Male / Euplagia quadripunctaria / Imago / Nikolay Grebennikov.

13.04.2019 17:54, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Well, it's like Euplagia quadripunctaria (Poda, 1761)

11.04.2019 12:40, Irek Yusupov:

Megatoma tianshanica

11.04.2019 12:40, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2019 12:39, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2019 12:39, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2019 12:39, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2019 12:39, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

05.04.2019 16:18, Peter Khramov:

-

03.04.2019 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is no such taxon in the database.

03.04.2019 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev Not identified.

03.04.2019 16:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

03.04.2019 16:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.04.2019 16:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysoteuchia mandschurica / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2019 17:22, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysoteuchia mandschurica

29.03.2019 14:06, Nikolay Grebennikov:

So this is Pseudophilotes bavius? Is it possible to determine exactly from this photo, or will it hang in inaccurate ones?

29.03.2019 11:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aporia crataegi / Vladimir Bobow Driopa stubbendorfii / Yuriy Karpov.

28.03.2019 10:17, Yuriy Karpov:

Thank you for the identification, Tatiana Gordeeva.

28.03.2019 10:15, Yuriy Karpov:

Driopa stubbendorfii (Menetries, 1849), male.

25.03.2019 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

25.03.2019 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

25.03.2019 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio machaon / Confidently identified / Larva / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.03.2019 14:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon.

25.03.2019 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

25.03.2019 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago / Confidently identified / Pupa / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.03.2019 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Yuriy Karpov Orgyia recens / Tentatively identified / Female / Tatyana Gordeeva.

25.03.2019 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Robot Orgyia recens / Tentatively identified / Female / Tatyana Gordeeva.

25.03.2019 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Robot Orgyia recens / Tentatively identified / Female / Tatyana Gordeeva.

25.03.2019 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Robot Orgyia recens / Tentatively identified / Female / Tatyana Gordeeva.

25.03.2019 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Robot Orgyia recens / Tentatively identified / Female / Tatyana Gordeeva.

22.03.2019 5:43, Tatyana Gordeeva:

This is a female from the genus Orgyia, most likely Orgyia recens (Hubner, 1819). The caterpillar of this species is a polyphage capable of feeding on conifers.

22.03.2019 5:23, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Smerinthus evesrmanni (Popoff in Eversmann, 1854) was described from Transbaikalia, Kiachta, and is considered as a subspecies: Callambulyx tatarinovii evesrmanni (Eversmann, 1854), comb. et stat. nov. The population is characterized by distinct sexual dimorphism of the species where males are green and females are always reddish brown [Eversmann, 1854; Gordeeva, Gordeev, 2010].

22.03.2019 5:22, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

20.03.2019 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev.

20.03.2019 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Alex Dumchus Utetheisa lotrix / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.03.2019 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Alex Dumchus Utetheisa lotrix / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.03.2019 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Danaus gilippus Danaus eresimus.

20.03.2019 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Danaus gilippus Danaus eresimus.

20.03.2019 9:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Robot Alex Dumchus.

20.03.2019 9:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Robot Alex Dumchus.

20.03.2019 9:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Composia credula.

20.03.2019 9:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Composia credula.

18.03.2019 15:36, Andrey Ponomarev:

Euura hypoxantha (Forester, 1854) C g

18.03.2019 15:36, Andrey Ponomarev:

Euura hypoxantha (Forester, 1854)

11.03.2019 13:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Utetheisa lotrix (Cramer, 1779)

27.02.2019 6:49, Alex Dumchus:

Please, move it to Danaus eresimus, only D. eresimus has white spots on the underside of the hindwings.

26.02.2019 21:28, Alex Dumchus:

Composia credula (Fabricius, 1775)

26.02.2019 21:27, Alex Dumchus:

Composia credula (Fabricius, 1775)

26.02.2019 15:15, Alexandra Lisitsyna: This species is identified correctly.

24.02.2019 19:11, Oleg Ilyasov: This species is identified correctly.

24.02.2019 18:24, Alexandra Lisitsyna: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2019 15:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acossus terebra Cossus cossus.

11.02.2019 15:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

10.02.2019 0:20, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Coreidae

10.02.2019 0:19, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Pentatomidae

10.02.2019 0:19, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Pentatomidae

10.02.2019 0:18, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Pentatomidae

10.02.2019 0:17, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Pentatomidae

10.02.2019 0:17, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Pentatomidae

10.02.2019 0:17, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acanthosomatidae

10.02.2019 0:16, Nikolai Vladimirov:

It's a fly, family Micropezidae

10.02.2019 0:15, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Corixidae

10.02.2019 0:15, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Cicadellidae

10.02.2019 0:13, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Reduviidae

10.02.2019 0:11, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Pentatomidae

10.02.2019 0:10, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Carpocoris sp.
det. raffaelerepoli (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:10, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Graphosoma lineata
det. fabienpiednoir (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:09, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Dolycoris baccarum
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:09, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Dolycoris baccarum
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:08, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Deraeocoris ruber
det. manval (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:08, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Plautia sp.
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:04, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Mecidea pallidissima
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:04, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Eurystylus bellevoyei
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:03, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Geocoris sp.
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:02, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Dicranocephalus insularis
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:02, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Nysius sp.
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:02, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Stictopleurus ribauti
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:01, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Sciocoris sp.
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:01, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Geocoris sp.
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

10.02.2019 0:00, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Oxycarenidae ?Leptodemus sp.
det. dhjacobs (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Mecidea pallidissima
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Miridae

09.02.2019 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Miridae

09.02.2019 23:58, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Orsillinae
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:58, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Miridae

09.02.2019 23:58, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Orsillinae
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:57, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Cydnidae

09.02.2019 23:57, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Miridae

09.02.2019 23:56, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Anthocoridae
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:55, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Rhyparochromidae
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:55, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Nysius sp.
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:54, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Arenocoris fallenii
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrosternum sp.
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 23:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrosternum sp.
det. wongun (inaturalist.org)

09.02.2019 1:19, Elena Volynets:

Alexander, I wrote it on my smartphone and the message was automatically edited, and I didn't check it. Cossus cossus.

06.02.2019 17:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Good afternoon, Elena!
It is very nice that you continue the work of Yury. :)
For this photo, please clarify. I didn't find this species at all. Or did you mean Cossus cossus? There is no acossus species in the genus Acossus. Please specify so that I can move this photo to its place. :)

04.02.2019 5:56, Elena Volynets:

Hello, Alexander.
This is the wife of Yury Semeykin.
Today I talked with Yu. A. Chistyakov, to whom I gave the stump in which this caterpillar hid. The moth hatched from it, but it was deformed, however, Yu. A. Chistyakov confidently identified it as Acossus acossus.
All the best,
Elena

31.01.2019 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

29.01.2019 21:06, Evgeny Komarov:

-

28.01.2019 18:17, Ivan Pristrem:

I think... Psorosa sp.?

23.01.2019 16:55, Andrey Ponomarev:

Polydrusus сervinus (Linnaeus, 1758)

23.01.2019 16:54, Andrey Ponomarev:

Polydrusus сervinus (Linnaeus, 1758)

22.01.2019 11:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Africa south of the Sahara. from Dakar to Fort-Dauphin, from Yemen to the Cape.

22.01.2019 10:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Acraea serena

22.01.2019 10:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Lomographa bimaculata / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.01.2019 15:50, Andrey Ponomarev:

Polystichus connexus (Fourcroy, 1785)
https://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/eng/zuphi_1.htm

20.01.2019 0:54, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Trachea atriplicis or the Far Eastern equivalent

20.01.2019 0:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acronicta ?leporina

20.01.2019 0:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Arctiidae

20.01.2019 0:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Arctiidae

18.01.2019 10:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Prismognathus subaeneus / Evgeny Komarov.

18.01.2019 10:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Poecilium maaki / Evgeny Komarov.

17.01.2019 12:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

A female.

17.01.2019 12:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum pedemontanum, female.

17.01.2019 12:15, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

A male.

17.01.2019 12:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

An immature male.

17.01.2019 12:12, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:11, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:11, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:11, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:11, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:10, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2019 12:10, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

08.01.2019 18:12, Alexander Korolev: This species is identified correctly.

07.01.2019 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acraea / Confidently identified Acraea eponina / Tentatively identified.

07.01.2019 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acraea / Confidently identified Acraea eponina / Tentatively identified.

07.01.2019 12:16, Alex Dumchus:

Similar, but it's not her. Serena is found in the southeast Africa, and I caught this one in the Gambia, the very west of Africa
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=214353.
Rather it is A.eponina

06.01.2019 19:31, Igor Ivannikov:

Very similar to Acraea serena Fabricius, 1775.

02.01.2019 19:56, Andrey Ponomarev:

Ochsenheimeria urella

02.01.2019 19:56, Andrey Ponomarev:

Ochsenheimeria urella

02.01.2019 19:56, Andrey Ponomarev:

Ochsenheimeria urella

02.01.2019 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eucosma tundrana / Vitaly Gumenuk Eucosma metzneriana / Andrey Ponomarev.

31.12.2018 17:56, Andrey Ponomarev:

Fellow admins, this photo should be moved to Eucosma metzneriana.

31.12.2018 16:04, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Andrey. I've moved it. Indeed, a mistake)

31.12.2018 0:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

31.12.2018 0:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

31.12.2018 0:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:05, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Mogoplistidae

31.12.2018 0:02, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

31.12.2018 0:01, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:01, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:01, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:00, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:00, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:00, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

31.12.2018 0:00, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:59, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:58, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:58, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:57, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:57, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:57, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:57, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:56, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:56, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

30.12.2018 23:55, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:55, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:55, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Mogoplistidae

30.12.2018 23:55, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Mogoplistidae

30.12.2018 23:54, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

30.12.2018 23:54, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:54, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

30.12.2018 23:54, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

30.12.2018 23:53, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

30.12.2018 23:53, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

30.12.2018 23:53, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:52, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tettigoniidae

30.12.2018 23:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Pholidoptera griseoaptera

30.12.2018 23:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Decticus verrucivorus

30.12.2018 23:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Acrididae

30.12.2018 23:41, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Anthomyia sp.

30.12.2018 23:41, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Anthomyia sp.

30.12.2018 23:40, Nikolai Vladimirov:

It seems like Discomyza incurva

30.12.2018 23:38, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Lauxaniidae

30.12.2018 23:38, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Dolichopodidae

30.12.2018 23:37, Nikolai Vladimirov:

most likely Minettia lupulina

30.12.2018 23:37, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Lauxaniidae

30.12.2018 23:37, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Syrphidae

30.12.2018 23:37, Nikolai Vladimirov:

most likely Minettia lupulina

30.12.2018 23:35, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Dolichopodidae

30.12.2018 23:34, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Bibionidae

30.12.2018 23:33, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Empididae

30.12.2018 23:32, Nikolai Vladimirov:

It seems to be Syrphidae

30.12.2018 23:31, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Calliphoridae

30.12.2018 23:31, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Empididae

30.12.2018 23:31, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Bibionidae

30.12.2018 23:30, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Lonchopteridae

30.12.2018 23:30, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Calliphoridae

30.12.2018 23:30, Nikolai Vladimirov:

?Empididae

30.12.2018 23:29, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tachinidae

30.12.2018 23:29, Nikolai Vladimirov:

?Cecidomyiidae

30.12.2018 23:28, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Dolichopodidae?

30.12.2018 23:27, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Syrphidae

30.12.2018 23:27, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tachinidae

30.12.2018 23:26, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Lauxaniidae

30.12.2018 23:25, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Empididae. Empis livida possibly?

30.12.2018 23:23, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tachinidae

30.12.2018 23:23, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tachinidae

30.12.2018 23:23, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Volucella pellucens

30.12.2018 23:21, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Bombyliidae

29.12.2018 22:31, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Lophopidae, Aluma ocellata
det. psyllidhipster (inaturalist.org)

29.12.2018 22:30, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Lophopidae, Aluma ocellata
det. psyllidhipster (inaturalist.org)

29.12.2018 21:15, Andrey Ponomarev: This species is identified correctly.

28.12.2018 23:35, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Eucosma metzneriana

25.12.2018 19:31, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena minos

25.12.2018 6:40, Ivan Pristrem:

По-моему, это Ophonus azureus. Я точно помню, что он ярко блестел синим с уклоном к зелёному на надкрыльях, просто это из-за привратностей освещения на снимке не видно.

24.12.2018 18:46, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is probably some kind of mistake. It should be transferred to Pyralidae.

23.12.2018 23:53, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Please, move both photos of this beetle to Coleoptera, I've uploaded them to Lepidoptera by mistake.

22.12.2018 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agrochola lota / Vitaly Gumenuk Actinotia polyodon / Andrey Ponomarev.

22.12.2018 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia orithya / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.12.2018 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Selenia lunularia / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Selenia tetralunaria / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

22.12.2018 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Selenia lunularia / Vitaly Gumenuk Selenia tetralunaria / Andrey Ponomarev.

22.12.2018 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agrochola lota Agrochola macilenta.

20.12.2018 17:33, Andrey Ponomarev:

Guys, it's Actinotia polyodon on St. John's wort, how did it end up here?

18.12.2018 19:06, Alex Dumchus:

Junonia orithya (Linnaeus, 1758)

18.12.2018 17:53, Andrey Ponomarev:

Selenia tetralunaria

18.12.2018 17:53, Andrey Ponomarev:

Selenia tetralunaria

18.12.2018 15:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Psoricoptera gibbosella Psoricoptera speciosella.

18.12.2018 15:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Psoricoptera gibbosella Psoricoptera speciosella.

18.12.2018 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Psoricoptera gibbosella Psoricoptera speciosella.

18.12.2018 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Psoricoptera gibbosella Psoricoptera speciosella.

18.12.2018 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Psoricoptera gibbosella Psoricoptera speciosella.

18.12.2018 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Psoricoptera gibbosella Psoricoptera speciosella.

17.12.2018 19:05, Andrey Ponomarev:

Admins, move photos #24772, #24773, #24768, #24769, #24770, #24771 to Psoricoptera speciosella, because the caterpillar does not have a black spot in the back.
As for photo #70076, there are doubts that this is Psoricoptera gibbosella. Psoricoptera gibbosella and Psoricoptera speciosella can be distinguished by genitalia or by caterpillars.

16.12.2018 0:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Mocis annetta / Irina Nikulina.

14.12.2018 5:30, Vera Volkotrub:

There are no taxa in the website database: Malachius prolongatus, Denticollis cinctus, Laemophloeus ribbei, Litargus kyushuensis

13.12.2018 8:34, Vera Volkotrub:

Hello, Peter. I can't upload or write anything. I can open any page only on the second attempt by reloading the page. There's just nothing, a white field. If you can still see something when the page is reloaded, then you cannot edit it.

13.12.2018 0:14, Irina Nikulina:

Mocis annetta

06.12.2018 15:38, ok ok:

06.12.2018 15:34, ok ok:

06.12.2018 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

06.12.2018 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Eurois occulta / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.12.2018 10:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Cucullia / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.11.2018 11:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae.

16.11.2018 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cephonodes picus / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus Cephonodes hylas / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

16.11.2018 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cephonodes picus / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus Cephonodes hylas / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

15.11.2018 21:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cephonodes hylas- голова и грудь белые

15.11.2018 1:28, Vera Volkotrub:

>>>>

15.11.2018 1:19, Vera Volkotrub:

>>>>

09.11.2018 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-aureum / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.11.2018 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.11.2018 10:27, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

05.11.2018 20:35, Fyodor Pudovikov:

imho, E. alternata

25.10.2018 20:25, Evgeny Komarov:

-

24.10.2018 23:52, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Cloeon ?dipterum/inscriptum, female

24.10.2018 23:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Serratella ignita, female

24.10.2018 23:51, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Ephemera vulgata, male

24.10.2018 23:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Ephemera vulgata, female

24.10.2018 23:50, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Leptophlebia marginata

24.10.2018 18:22, Peter Khramov:

-

22.10.2018 16:29, Alexandra Smirnova:

Hello dear entomologists! I'm still learning how to keep and breed mantises. Ш failed to raise two male Pseudocreobotra babies - one had already shed on the imago and unexpectedly died. wo predimago females remained. Perhaps someone has a male, for a meeting?

16.10.2018 9:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coenonympha mahometana / Stan Korb Coenonympha sunbecca / Evgeny Komarov.

16.10.2018 9:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coenonympha mahometana / Stan Korb Coenonympha sunbecca / Evgeny Komarov.

16.10.2018 6:02, Vera Volkotrub:

Teretriorhynchites (Aphlorhynchites) hirticollis (Faust, 1882)

15.10.2018 20:35, Irina Nikulina:

Evgeny, did Yuri Alexandrovich explain what the external difference is from Lophontosia cuculus? I've found in the literature only one species, so I identified my own photos from Anisimovka and Tiger vil. moved there, and now there are doubts, I can't understand how they differ.

15.10.2018 8:24, Vera Volkotrub:

Mycetina marginalis. det. A. Kovalev

12.10.2018 20:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chartographa ludovicaria Callabraxas ludovicaria.

12.10.2018 20:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chartographa ludovicaria Callabraxas ludovicaria.

12.10.2018 5:11, Zoran Bozovic:

This is A. livida. A. tetra has three/four light spots at the edge of apex.

11.10.2018 8:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Paracolax tristalis / Irina Nikulina.

11.10.2018 8:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Narosoideus flavidorsalis / Irina Nikulina.

11.10.2018 8:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Mythimna grandis / Irina Nikulina.

11.10.2018 8:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Cosmia camptostigma / Irina Nikulina.

10.10.2018 23:10, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Loensia ?fasciata

10.10.2018 23:10, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Mesopsocus sp. female

10.10.2018 23:09, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Peripsocus subfasciatus

10.10.2018 23:09, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Metylophorus nebulosus

10.10.2018 23:09, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Metylophorus nebulosus

10.10.2018 23:09, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Metylophorus nebulosus

10.10.2018 23:08, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Caecilius fuscopterus

10.10.2018 23:07, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Mesopsocus laticeps

10.10.2018 23:07, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Metylophorus nebulosus

10.10.2018 23:07, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Philotarsus picicornis

10.10.2018 23:07, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Peripsocus ?phaeopterus/parvulus

10.10.2018 23:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Metylophorus nebulosus

10.10.2018 23:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Caecilius fuscopterus

10.10.2018 23:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Peripsocus subfasciatus

10.10.2018 23:06, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Trichadenotecnum majus

10.10.2018 23:03, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Trichadenotecnum ?germanicum

10.10.2018 17:17, Irina Nikulina:

Paracolax tristalis

10.10.2018 17:16, Irina Nikulina:

Narosoideus flavidorsalis

10.10.2018 17:05, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna grandis

10.10.2018 16:54, Irina Nikulina:

Cosmia camptostigma

10.10.2018 15:59, Peter Khramov:

-

09.10.2018 20:49, Evgeny Komarov:

-

08.10.2018 19:51, Alexandra Naimush:

08.10.2018 19:50, Alexandra Naimush:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SIvTEunbQYk/T5lwN9NN-aI/AAAAAAAACcY/Fdc9WuKALKs/s640/watermicrobe!+(5).JPG
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-nG3ZPWEHzmc/T5lwKZtfBrI/AAAAAAAACcQ/0R84UQuts8g/s1600/watermicrobe!+(3).JPG

08.10.2018 19:48, Alexandra Naimush:

08.10.2018 11:54, Vera Volkotrub:


Silis rugimana (Kazantsev, 1994) - det. A.Kovalev et S.Kazantsev, 2018

08.10.2018 11:44, Vera Volkotrub:


Agrilus (Xeragrilus) ecarinatus Marseul, 1866 - det. M.Volkovitsh, 2018

08.10.2018 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa cardui / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

08.10.2018 4:02, Vera Volkotrub:

Okeanos quelpartensis

07.10.2018 19:43, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Vanessa cardui.

05.10.2018 15:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius, 1775) is a quarantine object for the Russian Federation.

04.10.2018 15:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Syneta Syneta adamsi.

04.10.2018 10:24, Vera Volkotrub:

Syneta adamsi Baly, 1877 - det. A.Moseyko, 2018

03.10.2018 9:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Cucullia mandschuriae / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.10.2018 9:32, Shamil Murtazin:

I would have checked the cereals anyway. There, basically, all sorts of kitchen insects multiply.

02.10.2018 9:23, Shamil Murtazin:

Looks like Rhyparochromus pini.

02.10.2018 9:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Post it at your SNS, for example in VK, and then link here. Others succeed :)

02.10.2018 7:15, Vadim Voitsekhovskii:

Demochroa is a genus of beetles in the family Buprestidae, containing the following species:[1]

Demochroa detanii Kurosawa, 1983
Demochroa gratiosa Deyrolle, 1864
Demochroa hashimotoi Kurosawa, 1991
Demochroa kiyoshii Endo, 1993
Demochroa lacordairei Thomson, 1859
Demochroa masukoae Endo, 1993

01.10.2018 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Favonius quercus / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.10.2018 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Alexandr Zhakov.

01.10.2018 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Vera Volkotrub Geometra papilionaria / Irina Nikulina.

01.10.2018 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithosiini / Vera Volkotrub Eilema griseola / Irina Nikulina.

01.10.2018 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Catocala / Vera Volkotrub Catocala dula / Irina Nikulina.

01.10.2018 9:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gastropacha Gastropacha quercifolia.

01.10.2018 9:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

01.10.2018 9:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gastropacha / Vera Volkotrub Gastropacha quercifolia / Irina Nikulina.

01.10.2018 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gastropacha Gastropacha quercifolia.

01.10.2018 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

26.09.2018 11:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Vera Volkotrub.

26.09.2018 11:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Vera Volkotrub.

26.09.2018 10:36, Irina Nikulina:

Eilema griseola

26.09.2018 10:25, Irina Nikulina:

Geometra papilionaria

26.09.2018 10:24, Zhenya Savelyeva:

That's what settled in the kitchen, I don't understand where they come from and most importantly, who it is.
A small one, with half the size of a cockroach. Sorry for the quality of the photo, it didn't work out better.
Please help me identify!

26.09.2018 10:20, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala dula

26.09.2018 9:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina / Vera Volkotrub Chrysolina exanthematica / Evgeny Komarov.

26.09.2018 9:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina / Vera Volkotrub Chrysolina exanthematica / Evgeny Komarov.

26.09.2018 1:01, Irina Nikulina:

Gastropacha quercifolia cerridifolia

25.09.2018 8:58, Vera Volkotrub:

G. clatrata?

25.09.2018 8:29, Vera Volkotrub:

Chrysolina exanthematica

23.09.2018 6:52, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Or maybe it's a subspecies of arachnocepta?

23.09.2018 0:10, aleksey V:

It is slightly larger than an ordinary black ant, about the size of a small black housefly.
Filled the whole house. They climb from the street through the windows. A lot behind the cabinets, on the eaves and curtains.

20.09.2018 21:11, Jan van Holten:

I made a wrong identification first time. This is Simyra nervosa.

19.09.2018 22:50, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2018 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Evgeny, I do not know who you are addressing, but you yourself are both a curator and a moderator with all rights, if nothing has changed. And you can add a species yourself and move other one to synonyms. :) I would like to help, of course, but I have no data on this synonymy. Dubatolov does not have the species Chelis strigulosa (Böttcher, 1905) in the database. To add a species, you need to link to some source, and I do not know one, except wikipedia :) send me a link to source if you can't add the species yourself.

13.09.2018 10:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cyana Bizone adelina.

13.09.2018 10:39, Evgeny Komarov:

More than a year has already passed since I asked to put this in order! Well, I transferred it myself to Chelis thianshana. Let it be better this way than in uncertain identification.

13.09.2018 10:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chelis Chelis thianshana.

13.09.2018 9:51, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Error with identification:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/morton1905/43415244164/in/dateposted/
https://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/1969695342

11.09.2018 9:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Svyatoslav Knyazev.

11.09.2018 8:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Basil Sergienko.

10.09.2018 23:19, Vladimir Deryabin:

Irina, Alexander, thank you.

09.09.2018 14:36, Dina Rubinina:

Hello, we found a caterpillar in Turkey 12 cm, I can't pick up a picture, I can send it to the mail

08.09.2018 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irek Yusupov Vlad Proklov.

08.09.2018 21:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irek Yusupov Vlad Proklov.

08.09.2018 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lasiommata megera / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

08.09.2018 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub Gastropacha clathrata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.09.2018 21:08, Irina Nikulina:

Lasiommata megera, male

05.09.2018 16:42, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

03.09.2018 18:29, Irina Nikulina:

I would put it in inaccurate identification: Gastropacha clathrata (The outer edge of the front wing is not too well represented for accurate determination)

31.08.2018 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Laothoe populi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Elena Volynets Lobocla bifasciatus / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Euchristophia cumulata / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Hypsopygia glaucinalis / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrhoe tristata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Miltochrista aberrans / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Maniola jurtina / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Camptogramma bilineata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Deryabin Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Letogenes festalis / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Hypsopygia regina / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Elena Volynets Parectropis similaria / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Elena Volynets Hydrelia nisaria / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Elena Volynets Naxa seriaria / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Sergey Simonov Ochlodes sylvanus / Fyodor Pudovikov.

31.08.2018 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Sergey Yakush Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Narosoideus flavidorsalis / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Elena Volynets Calliteara pseudabietis / Male / Irina Nikulina.

31.08.2018 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erebidae / Elena Volynets Herminia grisealis / Irina Nikulina.

27.08.2018 11:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Cyana adelina (Staudinger, 1887). Definition of Oleg Pekarsky (Barko)/ Please, add the species to the website database.

27.08.2018 7:58, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

25.08.2018 16:28, Irina Nikulina:

This is a Laothoe populi

25.08.2018 15:19, Victoria Srybna:

Dear users and site administration! Please tell me, what is this butterfly?

16.08.2018 23:28, Irina Nikulina:

Lobocla bifasciatus

16.08.2018 23:26, Irina Nikulina:

Euchristophia cumulata

16.08.2018 23:25, Irina Nikulina:

Hypsopygia glaucinalis

16.08.2018 23:24, Irina Nikulina:

Miltochrista aberrans

10.08.2018 21:59, Irina Nikulina:

Epirrhoe tristata?

09.08.2018 18:37, Vladimir Deryabin: This species is identified correctly.

09.08.2018 18:36, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Irina.

09.08.2018 18:36, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Irina.

08.08.2018 9:16, Irina Nikulina:

Maniola jurtina

08.08.2018 8:55, Irina Nikulina:

Camptogramma bilineata

01.08.2018 13:18, Irek Yusupov:

Haematopota sf. italica

30.07.2018 22:58, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Irina.

30.07.2018 20:39, Irina Nikulina:

Pararge aegeria

27.07.2018 8:46, Vladimir Bryukhov:

I have big doubts that this is Tabanus sudeticus. The coloring of the abdomen does not match.

26.07.2018 15:34, Irina Nikulina:

I am happy for you and Olya and I envy you with white envy!) I would join with pleasure, I also never got to the end of July or the beginning of August... But so far, only big and warm greetings to Primorye, Anisimovka, Sergey, taiga! Good luck and I wish you new discoveries!!

25.07.2018 23:18, Evgeny Komarov:

From July 27, finally a vacation! I will be in Primorye until August 20 (Vityaz+Anisimovka) - somehow my previous trips fell on the same season. Now we're going later, I hope for something new. See you to all the colleagues!

18.07.2018 22:25, Irina Nikulina:

Letogenes festalis

18.07.2018 22:24, Irina Nikulina:

Hypsopygia regina

18.07.2018 22:24, Irina Nikulina:

Parectropis similaria

18.07.2018 22:23, Irina Nikulina:

Hydrelia nisaria

18.07.2018 22:22, Irina Nikulina:

Naxa seriaria

15.07.2018 7:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas grossulariata minor / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

15.07.2018 7:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba sperchius / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

15.07.2018 7:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba sperchius / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

12.07.2018 16:14, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you Shamil, I tried, it didn't help. Old numbers are not removed and new ones are not added. It looks like everything needs to be reloaded here. There is no desire. Don't let it be as it is.

12.07.2018 3:56, Crazy Demon:

It turns out that I often met them as a child, I just never saw them with a "raised tail" =) On the first photo it looks like a scorpion =)

12.07.2018 2:14, Crazy Demon:

Many thanks Irina!
In the photos, I did not specifically remove geotags, i.e. the exact coordinates of the shooting location can be viewed by any program showing EXIF. And in words, this is the Far East, the Amur region, Blagoveshchensk, almost the center of the city, residential quarters, although there are a couple of small squares nearby, mixed breeds (coniferous, deciduous, shrub)

11.07.2018 15:26, Irina Nikulina:

Your "passenger" was a moth Datanoides fasciata :) A truly unusual creature) Here we have more photos of her https://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/21100 Ivan, it is advisable to indicate the location of the shooting. Such a firefly lives only in 6 regions of the Russian Federation.

11.07.2018 8:01, Crazy Demon:

I duplicated the second image by accident...

11.07.2018 8:00, Crazy Demon:

Hello dear Experts.

Getting into my car, I saw "something" on the glass... it looked unusual because of its "tail".
Took a couple of photos, from the car and outside.
It became somehow scary to drive the "passenger" by hand =)
Please tell me - who was it?
I am grateful to you in advance.

Previews:


Full photos
http://d8s.ru/img/IMG_20180711_074255.jpg

10.07.2018 11:38, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Ochlodes sylvanus

09.07.2018 11:23, Shamil Murtazin:

Standard mode:
- upload a series of photos;
- go to "Edit" (https://insecta.pro/ru/usercab/usergallery );
- find the first image of the planned group there and copy the photo number to the site database, for example #68725 (copy only numbers);
- find the rest of the photos, except for the first (copied), and put the number of the first photo (copied) in their extreme column;
- click "Update and Delete" at the bottom left of the screen form.

If it didn't work, then this is a website problem and only Peter can solve it ... i.e. you will have to write to him :)

07.07.2018 22:06, Irina Nikulina:

Ematurga atomaria

07.07.2018 6:09, Anna Gerasimova:

This is an important event, congratulations!

02.07.2018 12:20, Alexander Belousov:

I can link only one photo! How to link the whole series?

01.07.2018 19:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Good photo, but please, don't use logo.

01.07.2018 18:49, Shahrzad Fattahi: This species is identified correctly.

01.07.2018 18:47, Shahrzad Fattahi: This species is identified correctly.

29.06.2018 15:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Elena Volynets Cystidia stratonice / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2018 23:11, Irina Nikulina:

Narosoideus flavidorsalis

27.06.2018 23:10, Irina Nikulina:

Cystidia stratonice

27.06.2018 23:09, Irina Nikulina:

Calliteara pseudabietis male

27.06.2018 23:09, Irina Nikulina:

Herminia grisealis

26.06.2018 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Elena Volynets Eupithecia / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2018 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notodontidae / Elena Volynets Furcula bicuspis / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2018 9:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Opodiphthera / Alex Dumchus Opodiphthera sciron / Igor Ivannikov.

26.06.2018 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Opodiphthera Opodiphthera sciron.

26.06.2018 9:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Igor Ivannikov.

24.06.2018 15:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Two thousand five hundred taxa on the website were illustrated!

24.06.2018 14:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Scarabaeus typhon Scarabaeus pius.

22.06.2018 18:51, Anna Gerasimova:

Good afternoon! I found a typo on this page https://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/7322. An extra letter in the Russian name of the species.

20.06.2018 16:55, Olga Voronova: This species is identified correctly.

20.06.2018 12:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliothis viriplaca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

19.06.2018 12:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina sanguinolenta Chrysolina gypsophilae.

13.06.2018 11:26, Sergey Simonov:

Thymelicus lineola?

13.06.2018 9:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dixus eremita Dixus obscurus.

13.06.2018 9:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dixus eremita Dixus obscurus.

13.06.2018 9:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dixus eremita Dixus obscurus.

13.06.2018 9:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dixus eremita Dixus obscurus.

13.06.2018 9:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dixus eremita Dixus obscurus.

09.06.2018 21:48, Irek Yusupov:

Protophormia terraenovae

09.06.2018 16:12, Irek Yusupov:

Thyridanthrax sf. fenestratus

04.06.2018 22:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calathus fuscipes / Imago / Sergeyy Tjabut Poecilus versicolor / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

04.06.2018 22:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calathus fuscipes / Imago / Sergeyy Tjabut Poecilus versicolor / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

04.06.2018 10:51, Irek Yusupov:

Heptatoma pellucens

04.06.2018 8:43, Irek Yusupov:

Villa sp.

03.06.2018 19:40, cengiz bostanci: This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2018 19:39, cengiz bostanci: This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2018 19:39, cengiz bostanci: This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2018 16:24, Irek Yusupov:

Sargus cuprarius

03.06.2018 16:15, Irek Yusupov:

Hybomitra cf. sexfasciata

02.06.2018 23:20, Irek Yusupov:

Lauxania cylindricornis

02.06.2018 23:03, Irek Yusupov:

Prosena siberita

02.06.2018 22:58, Irek Yusupov:

Sargus sp.

02.06.2018 17:17, Igor Ivannikov:

Opodiphtera sciron Westwood,1881. Papua New Guinea.

02.06.2018 17:15, Igor Ivannikov:

Opodiphthera sciron Westwood,1881. Papua New Guinea.

01.06.2018 10:49, Irina Nikulina:

Eupitheciasp.

01.06.2018 10:37, Irina Nikulina:

Furcula bicuspis

31.05.2018 21:00, Irek Yusupov:

Dolichopus ungulatus

29.05.2018 15:56, Irek Yusupov:

Chrysops divaricatus

27.05.2018 19:09, Irek Yusupov:

Please add the identification:
Sphaerophoria scripta
https://diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=7&thread_id=84751&pid=353396#post_353391

27.05.2018 17:07, Irek Yusupov:

Tabanus bromius

27.05.2018 15:55, Irek Yusupov:

Chrysops viduatus

27.05.2018 12:10, Irek Yusupov:

Please change it (the possibility of self-editing is blocked).

27.05.2018 11:47, Irek Yusupov:

Tephritis bardanae
https://diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=84940#post_354185

26.05.2018 4:36, Boris Loboda:

Please, change Arma custos to Acanthosoma forficula.

26.05.2018 0:08, cengiz bostanci:

For the first time in Turkey, we have detected this walnut harming insect in Bartin during our explorations. This experience was very breathtaking like the first step the man made on the moon. Seeing the adult, the eggs, the larva , the pupa was exciting. There was no other image of this insect except the pencil drawing of the egg of it that was made in 1912. We have photographed this its egg in color for the first time in the world. We still continue working on this subject and we continue working on detecting the harms that organisms make in agricultural areas, lifecycles and fight for all these pests with the support and the education spectrum that our ministry of agriculture provides.
This insect is a serious threat for the walnut shoots and for the fruit of walnut logs. We are aware of the fact that this insect exist in various countries. The reason why this insect hasnt been recognized is that the harm it makes to shoots has been confused by the harm made by Zeuzera Pyrina and the harm it makes to the fruit was confused by the harm Cydia Pomonella makes. The spread path of this insect is caused by the logs of walnut, the species doesnt get spread by neither the fruit nor the seedling .
http://dergipark.gov.tr/barofd/issue/36468/416647
TAM METİN
Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey / Sayfalar: 1-1 Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey.docx
Yafes Yıldız, ibrahim YILDIRIM, Cengiz Bostancı, Onur AYDOĞAN
http://dergipark.gov.tr/barofd/issue/36468/416647
There was no other image of this insect except the pencil drawing of the egg of it that was made in 1912. We have photographed this its egg in color for the first time in the world.

This pest does not spread with the sapling of walnut. The insect is in pupa state during the winter. Homeland of the insect is Tadjikistan and Uzbekistan. All of the countries that import lumber (logs) from these countries are under attack of these insects.

Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey

Yafes Yıldız [1] , ibrahim YILDIRIM [2] , Cengiz Bostancı [3] , Onur AYDOĞAN [4]

2 4

Öz

Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, was recorded in Turkey as the first time the result of studies conducted in the Bartin province between 2015-2018. This species which is an important walnut pest in middle Asia but, the damage is not exactly known in our country. Because damage of E. musculana confused with Zeuzera pyrina in fresh shoots and Cydia pomonella in walnut green hull.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Erschoviella musculana, Asian walnut moth, Bartın, Cydia pomonella
Kaynakça

1. Anonim (2010). Ceviz hastalık ve zararlıları ile mücadele. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Koruma ve Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 32s.
2. Anonim (2012). Teorikten pratiğe biyolojik mücadele. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Koruma ve Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 224s.
3. Degtyareva VI (1964). The main lepidopterous pests of trees and shrubs of the central part of Guissar mountain ridge and Guissar valley. Edition of Academy of Sciences of the Tajik SSR. pp. 241.
4. EPPO (2005). Data sheets on quarantine pests Erschoviella musculana, OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 35, 425–428
5. EPPO (2018). https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ERSHMU/distribution
6. FAO (2014). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize
7. Khan, ZH, Ramamurthy, VV, Mudasir AD, Raina RH (2011). The Asian Walnut Moth Erschoviella musculana Erschoff, 1874 (Nolidae: Lepidoptera) A New Pest of Walnut for Kashmir Valley of J&K, India, Indian Horticulture Journal; 1(1): 055-056.
8. Makhnovskii IK (1970). The walnut moth. Zashchita Rastenii 16: 30-32.
9. Orozumbekov A, Moore B (2007). Overview of forest pests Kyrgyz Republic In: Allard G (ed)Forest health and biosecurity working papers. Forest Resources Development Service, Forestry Deparment, Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nation. Working paper FBS/21E Rome, Italy, pp 1-60
10. Pavlovskii EN and Shtakelberg AA (1955). Forest pests guide. Moscow-Leningrad: Edition of Academy of Sciences of the USSR 1: 421.
11. Sangov R (2015). Tacikistan ormanlarında önemli lepidopter zararlıları Sarrothripus musculana Ershov ve Hyponomenta malinelusus’nın ekolojileri ve çevreye dost koruma sistemlerinin geliştirilmesi, Orman Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, 220 s., Duşanbe
12. Sviridov AV (2008). The walnut Nyctoline moth Erschoviella musculana Erschov. Ukraine (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bibl. 15.Cf. Biological Series 113(1): 60-61.
Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil tr
Konular
Dergi Bölümü Biodiversity, Environmental Management and Policy, Sustainable Forestry
Yazarlar
Yazar: Yafes Yıldız (Sorumlu Yazar)
E-posta: yyildiz@bartin.edu.tr
Kurum: Bartın Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi
Ülke: Turkey

Yazar: ibrahim YILDIRIM
E-posta: iyildiirm@hotmail.com
Kurum: Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Müdürlüğü
Yazar: Cengiz Bostancı
E-posta: ceviz@ceviz.biz
Yazar: Onur AYDOĞAN
E-posta: onur@hotmail.com
Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { barofd416647, journal = {Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry}, issn = {1302-0943}, address = {Bartın Üniversitesi}, year = {}, volume = {20}, pages = {1 - 1}, doi = {}, title = {Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey}, key = {cite}, author = {YILDIRIM, ibrahim and Yıldız, Yafes and AYDOĞAN, Onur and Bostancı, Cengiz} }
APA Yıldız, Y , YILDIRIM, i , Bostancı, C , AYDOĞAN, O . (). Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 20 (2), 1-1. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/barofd/issue/36468/416647
MLA Yıldız, Y , YILDIRIM, i , Bostancı, C , AYDOĞAN, O . "Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey". Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry 20 (): 1-1
Chicago Yıldız, Y , YILDIRIM, i , Bostancı, C , AYDOĞAN, O . "Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey". Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry 20 (): 1-1
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey AU - Yafes Yıldız , ibrahim YILDIRIM , Cengiz Bostancı , Onur AYDOĞAN Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - DO - T2 - Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 1 EP - 1 VL - 20 IS - 2 SN - 1302-0943-1308-5875 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey %A Yafes Yıldız , ibrahim YILDIRIM , Cengiz Bostancı , Onur AYDOĞAN %T Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey %D 2018 %J Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry %P 1302-0943-1308-5875 %V 20 %N 2 %R %U

26.05.2018 0:06, cengiz bostanci:

For the first time in Turkey, we have detected this walnut harming insect in Bartin during our explorations. This experience was very breathtaking like the first step the man made on the moon. Seeing the adult, the eggs, the larva , the pupa was exciting. There was no other image of this insect except the pencil drawing of the egg of it that was made in 1912. We have photographed this its egg in color for the first time in the world. We still continue working on this subject and we continue working on detecting the harms that organisms make in agricultural areas, lifecycles and fight for all these pests with the support and the education spectrum that our ministry of agriculture provides.
This insect is a serious threat for the walnut shoots and for the fruit of walnut logs. We are aware of the fact that this insect exist in various countries. The reason why this insect hasnt been recognized is that the harm it makes to shoots has been confused by the harm made by Zeuzera Pyrina and the harm it makes to the fruit was confused by the harm Cydia Pomonella makes. The spread path of this insect is caused by the logs of walnut, the species doesnt get spread by neither the fruit nor the seedling

25.05.2018 23:52, cengiz bostanci: This species is identified correctly.

25.05.2018 23:50, cengiz bostanci:

The spread path of this insect is caused by the logs of walnut, the species doesnt get spread by neither the fruit nor the seedling

25.05.2018 23:48, cengiz bostanci:

http://ceviz.biz/Forums-file-viewtopic-t-393
http://dergipark.gov.tr/barofd/issue/36468/416647
This pest does not spread with the sapling of walnut. The insect is in pupa state during the winter. Homeland of the insect is Tadjikistan and Uzbekistan. All of the countries that import lumber (logs) from these countries are under attack of these insects.

Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey

Yafes Yıldız [1] , ibrahim YILDIRIM [2] , Cengiz Bostancı [3] , Onur AYDOĞAN [4]

2 4

Öz

Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, was recorded in Turkey as the first time the result of studies conducted in the Bartin province between 2015-2018. This species which is an important walnut pest in middle Asia but, the damage is not exactly known in our country. Because damage of E. musculana confused with Zeuzera pyrina in fresh shoots and Cydia pomonella in walnut green hull.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Erschoviella musculana, Asian walnut moth, Bartın, Cydia pomonella
Kaynakça

1. Anonim (2010). Ceviz hastalık ve zararlıları ile mücadele. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Koruma ve Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 32s.
2. Anonim (2012). Teorikten pratiğe biyolojik mücadele. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Koruma ve Kontrol Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 224s.
3. Degtyareva VI (1964). The main lepidopterous pests of trees and shrubs of the central part of Guissar mountain ridge and Guissar valley. Edition of Academy of Sciences of the Tajik SSR. pp. 241.
4. EPPO (2005). Data sheets on quarantine pests Erschoviella musculana, OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 35, 425–428
5. EPPO (2018). https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/ERSHMU/distribution
6. FAO (2014). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize
7. Khan, ZH, Ramamurthy, VV, Mudasir AD, Raina RH (2011). The Asian Walnut Moth Erschoviella musculana Erschoff, 1874 (Nolidae: Lepidoptera) A New Pest of Walnut for Kashmir Valley of J&K, India, Indian Horticulture Journal; 1(1): 055-056.
8. Makhnovskii IK (1970). The walnut moth. Zashchita Rastenii 16: 30-32.
9. Orozumbekov A, Moore B (2007). Overview of forest pests Kyrgyz Republic In: Allard G (ed)Forest health and biosecurity working papers. Forest Resources Development Service, Forestry Deparment, Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nation. Working paper FBS/21E Rome, Italy, pp 1-60
10. Pavlovskii EN and Shtakelberg AA (1955). Forest pests guide. Moscow-Leningrad: Edition of Academy of Sciences of the USSR 1: 421.
11. Sangov R (2015). Tacikistan ormanlarında önemli lepidopter zararlıları Sarrothripus musculana Ershov ve Hyponomenta malinelusus’nın ekolojileri ve çevreye dost koruma sistemlerinin geliştirilmesi, Orman Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, 220 s., Duşanbe
12. Sviridov AV (2008). The walnut Nyctoline moth Erschoviella musculana Erschov. Ukraine (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bibl. 15.Cf. Biological Series 113(1): 60-61.
Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil tr
Konular
Dergi Bölümü Biodiversity, Environmental Management and Policy, Sustainable Forestry
Yazarlar
Yazar: Yafes Yıldız (Sorumlu Yazar)
E-posta: yyildiz@bartin.edu.tr
Kurum: Bartın Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi
Ülke: Turkey

Yazar: ibrahim YILDIRIM
E-posta: iyildiirm@hotmail.com
Kurum: Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Müdürlüğü
Yazar: Cengiz Bostancı
E-posta: cbostanci@hotmail.com
Yazar: Onur AYDOĞAN
E-posta: onur@hotmail.com
Kaynak Göster

Bibtex @araştırma makalesi { barofd416647, journal = {Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry}, issn = {1302-0943}, address = {Bartın Üniversitesi}, year = {}, volume = {20}, pages = {1 - 1}, doi = {}, title = {Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey}, key = {cite}, author = {YILDIRIM, ibrahim and Yıldız, Yafes and AYDOĞAN, Onur and Bostancı, Cengiz} }
APA Yıldız, Y , YILDIRIM, i , Bostancı, C , AYDOĞAN, O . (). Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey. Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry, 20 (2), 1-1. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/barofd/issue/36468/416647
MLA Yıldız, Y , YILDIRIM, i , Bostancı, C , AYDOĞAN, O . "Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey". Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry 20 (): 1-1
Chicago Yıldız, Y , YILDIRIM, i , Bostancı, C , AYDOĞAN, O . "Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey". Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry 20 (): 1-1
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey AU - Yafes Yıldız , ibrahim YILDIRIM , Cengiz Bostancı , Onur AYDOĞAN Y1 - 2018 PY - 2018 N1 - DO - T2 - Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 1 EP - 1 VL - 20 IS - 2 SN - 1302-0943-1308-5875 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey %A Yafes Yıldız , ibrahim YILDIRIM , Cengiz Bostancı , Onur AYDOĞAN %T Erschoviella musculana Erschoff 1874, A New Record And A New Walnut Pest In Turkey %D 2018 %J Journal of Bartin Faculty of Forestry %P 1302-0943-1308-5875 %V 20 %N 2 %R %U

25.05.2018 23:45, cengiz bostanci:

For the first time in Turkey, we have detected this walnut harming insect in Bartin during our explorations. This experience was very breathtaking like the first step the man made on the moon. Seeing the adult, the eggs, the larva , the pupa was exciting. There was no other image of this insect except the pencil drawing of the egg of it that was made in 1912. We have photographed this its egg in color for the first time in the world. We still continue working on this subject and we continue working on detecting the harms that organisms make in agricultural areas, lifecycles and fight for all these pests with the support and the education spectrum that our ministry of agriculture provides.
This insect is a serious threat for the walnut shoots and for the fruit of walnut logs. We are aware of the fact that this insect exist in various countries. The reason why this insect hasnt been recognized is that the harm it makes to shoots has been confused by the harm made by Zeuzera Pyrina and the harm it makes to the fruit was confused by the harm Cydia Pomonella makes. The spread path of this insect is caused by the logs of walnut, the species doesnt get spread by neither the fruit nor the seedling

25.05.2018 23:45, cengiz bostanci: This species is identified correctly.

24.05.2018 16:34, Irek Yusupov:

Myoleja lucida

22.05.2018 22:48, Irek Yusupov:

Myoleja lucida
https://diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=84845#post_353810

22.05.2018 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

So Cucullia inderiensis, then no, only Cucullia boryphora, it is probably too late for them.

22.05.2018 22:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander! It's not me :) I'm not taking any risks with this genus - it's too much of a problem. These are Alexey Matov's identification, but I sent such a bunch of photos to him that I could well have missed inderiensis in the pile (there were a dozen and a half of them).

22.05.2018 19:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia inderiensis / Evgeny Komarov Cucullia boryphora / Basil Sergienko.

22.05.2018 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irek, it is impossible to determine the species with such a photo, there is a problem even in genus level.

22.05.2018 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugeny, we've both species, that's for sure. You made a mistake.

22.05.2018 16:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia inderiensis / Evgeny Komarov Cucullia boryphora / Basil Sergienko.

22.05.2018 16:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Drasteria flexuosa / Alexandr Zhakov Drasteria saisani / Eddy Verfaillie.

22.05.2018 11:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia inderiensis / Evgeny Komarov Cucullia boryphora / Basil Sergienko.

22.05.2018 6:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander! Eddy Verfaillie is right - it's a saisani, I've already seen enough of this...

22.05.2018 6:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Tislenko Anisodactylus binotatus / Evgeny Komarov.

21.05.2018 8:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first male in the collection.
Females occasionally come across, but finding a male is generally a huge success. Finally here it is. And I found it right in the city, on my street, on the sidewalk :)

19.05.2018 11:29, Boris Loboda: This species is identified correctly.

19.05.2018 11:29, Boris Loboda: This species is identified correctly.

19.05.2018 7:52, Alexander Belousov:

It is the one!

18.05.2018 18:58, Vladimir Deryabin:

Issoria lathonia?

18.05.2018 17:51, Irek Yusupov:

Solieria sp.

18.05.2018 17:43, Irek Yusupov:

Calliphora vicina
https://diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=84749#post_353492

18.05.2018 11:34, Irek Yusupov:

The possibility of editing the author's data on the photo is blocked :)

18.05.2018 11:25, Irek Yusupov:

Stenoptilia pterodactyla?

17.05.2018 15:33, Irek Yusupov:

Sphaerophoria scripta
https://diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=7&thread_id=84751&pid=353396#post_353391

17.05.2018 14:47, Sergei Eremin:

>>>>

16.05.2018 14:06, Irek Yusupov:

Micropeza corrigiolata

15.05.2018 14:47, Sergei Eremin:

>>>>

11.05.2018 8:13, Irek Yusupov:

Derephysia longispin­a
Thanks for the correction. Please move the picture from D. cristata.

10.05.2018 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.05.2018 22:29, Irek Yusupov:

Lepturobosca virens ?

08.05.2018 21:14, Boris Loboda:

Acanthosoma forficula Jakovlev, 1880
Identification: Drogvalenko A.N.

08.05.2018 14:24, Boris Loboda:

Let it be longispina.

05.05.2018 0:13, Boris Loboda:

Although there is only A. custos in the Far East literature.

04.05.2018 23:56, Boris Loboda:

This is not Arma custos. The eyes are too small, the antennas are different, and generally the specimen is too shiny.

01.05.2018 13:48, Vladimir Deryabin: This species is identified correctly.

30.04.2018 22:11, Irek Yusupov:

Orthotylus sp.

28.04.2018 12:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Pararge aegeria

24.04.2018 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis camilla / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2018 20:42, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis camilla

22.04.2018 22:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Trichopteryx ustata / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2018 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Elena Volynets Trichopteryx ustata / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2018 19:56, Irek Yusupov:

There is an opinion: Phytocoris nowickyi.

22.04.2018 0:01, Irina Nikulina:

Trichopteryx ustata

21.04.2018 13:24, SK Duttamajumder:

This is a pupa of Sesamia inferens. During the uploading the picture was mixed up with picture of Polyocha depressella. Kindly correct the error.

15.04.2018 23:20, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Gilpinia virens (Klug, 1812), the author of the definition is A. E. Kostunin, corrected by A. Boldyrev.

15.04.2018 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is a subspecies: https://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id1148774/
But it is listed there for Turkey

15.04.2018 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysolina reitteri / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

15.04.2018 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysolina reitteri / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

14.04.2018 9:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela restricta / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela gemmata / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2018 9:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela restricta Cicindela gemmata.

11.04.2018 18:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apamea remissa Mesapamea.

11.04.2018 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic Basil Sergienko.

10.04.2018 8:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cephalota elegans Cephalota deserticola.

10.04.2018 8:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cephalota elegans Cephalota deserticola.

09.04.2018 18:58, Peter Khramov:

>>>>

07.04.2018 18:49, Zoran Bozovic:

"Image without retouching" ??? All my images are retouched/edited.
These are digital images, for God sake!!!

07.04.2018 18:36, Zoran Bozovic:

"Image without retouching" meaning; no sharpening.
Why not, digital images are crying for sharpening, by default.

Значение «Изображение без ретуширования»; без заточки.
Почему бы и нет, цифровые изображения плачут для заточки, по умолчанию.
Zoran

06.04.2018 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

>>>>

06.04.2018 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Siona lineata / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.04.2018 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Siona lineata / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.04.2018 8:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus thersites / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.04.2018 17:34, Andrey Ponomarev:

Chrysolina pseudolurida (Roubal, 1917)

01.04.2018 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mariya Gornova Irina Nikulina.

01.04.2018 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mariya Gornova Irina Nikulina.

31.03.2018 22:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cymindis lineata / Andrey Ponomarev Cymindis decora / Evgeny Komarov.

31.03.2018 22:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cymindis lineata / Andrey Ponomarev Cymindis decora / Evgeny Komarov.

31.03.2018 10:22, Andrey Ponomarev:

Eugeny hi, we identified it here, but I completely agree with your identification.
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&st=25200

30.03.2018 15:18, Irina Nikulina:

Ematurga atomaria, male

30.03.2018 9:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Andrey! It seems to me that there is a error here. All specimens of this appearance from the sands of the Astrakhan region are identified as Cymindis decora Fischer von Waldheim, 1829.

29.03.2018 23:50, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

29.03.2018 23:49, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

29.03.2018 23:42, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

29.03.2018 23:41, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

29.03.2018 19:47, Andrey Ponomarev:

Lepidonotaris petax (Sahlberg, 1823)?

29.03.2018 19:18, Andrey Ponomarev:

Graptus triguttatus (Fabricius, 1775)

29.03.2018 19:14, Andrey Ponomarev:

Dorytomus tortrix (Linnaeus, 1761)

29.03.2018 19:10, Andrey Ponomarev:

Dorytomus dorsalis (Linnaeus, 1758)

29.03.2018 19:04, Andrey Ponomarev:

Dorytomus melanophthalmus (Paykull 1792)-is this true?

29.03.2018 18:42, Andrey Ponomarev:

Cionus hortulanus (Fourcroy, 1785)-is that right?

29.03.2018 15:13, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Maybe me move it to Aedes rossicus (see comments on Diptera.info https://diptera.info/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=78120

27.03.2018 0:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Goniodoma auroguttella.

26.03.2018 23:09, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

26.03.2018 23:08, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

26.03.2018 21:49, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

26.03.2018 21:27, Irek Yusupov:

Derephysia cristata

26.03.2018 20:32, Andry Shaposhnikov: This species is identified correctly.

25.03.2018 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Yeah... OK, I'll see how this could happen.

25.03.2018 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I saw Peter today and I showed him the problem. He should fix it :)

25.03.2018 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, Vasily, I wanted to clarify it :)) now Peter will have to dig around for a long time to find out and fix this stuff. But only Peter can understand cause of this error.

24.03.2018 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I specifically found out today about the subspecies that Tuzov has around there.
But is's transferred to Parnassius for some reason....
Figure it out please :)

24.03.2018 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

24.03.2018 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Driopa mnemosyne Parnassius mnemosyne weidingeri.

21.03.2018 18:46, Andrey Ponomarev:

I can't find Empria magnicornis (Eversmann, 1864) species on the website.

21.03.2018 16:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

21.03.2018 16:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

21.03.2018 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vladimir, it’s very good that you have two identical identifications. I don’t know what YF is, but I know Ilya Ustyantsev. :) The question remains, whose identification? although you gave an answer. If you cannot place the "identification by" in the source data, it is advisable to indicate this in the author’s comments.

16.03.2018 22:57, Andrey Ponomarev:

Identification by Alexander Boldyrev

16.03.2018 18:57, Andrey Ponomarev:

Identification by Alexander Boldyrev

16.03.2018 18:57, Andrey Ponomarev:

Identification by Alexander Boldyrev

16.03.2018 18:33, Andrey Ponomarev:

Identification by Alexander Boldyrev

16.03.2018 18:32, Andrey Ponomarev:

Identification by Alexander Boldyrev

15.03.2018 15:24, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Alexander, it's Ok. I do not question your identification of molbiol forums. It’s just that at YF Ilya Ustyantsev suggested the species a little earlier than your answer...

13.03.2018 16:02, Yuriy Karpov:

Bryodemella tuberculata (Fabricius, 1775).

12.03.2018 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vdamimir, did you post it on mobile forums for confirmation?

11.03.2018 15:26, Jolynn van Duffelen:

https://observation.org/waarneming/view/149391396

11.03.2018 15:24, Jolynn van Duffelen:

Picture taken today, March 11 2018 in Qatar.

[img]https://observation.org/fotonew/9/16084869.jpg[/img]

09.03.2018 17:26, Idris SARI: This species is identified correctly.

09.03.2018 17:25, Idris SARI: This species is identified correctly.

07.03.2018 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Ryan Brookes.

07.03.2018 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Ryan Brookes.

07.03.2018 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Ryan Brookes.

05.03.2018 13:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Ochlodes venatus / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.03.2018 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Clossiana selenis selenis Boloria selenis.

05.03.2018 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Clossiana selenis selenis.

05.03.2018 13:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Yuriy Karpov.

05.03.2018 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Pterophoridae.

05.03.2018 11:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Melanitis phedima Melanitis leda.

05.03.2018 11:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Melanitis phedima Melanitis leda.

05.03.2018 11:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Appias nero Appias galba.

02.03.2018 17:32, Irina Nikulina:

It also seemed to me that it was more likely a female Ochlodes venatus. It'd be nice to have underside for more accuracy)

01.03.2018 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Strange appearence for Ochlodes sylvanus, but is there anything similar there?

28.02.2018 19:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Amata sperbius Fabricius, 1787???

28.02.2018 19:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Amata sperbius Fabricius, 1787???

28.02.2018 7:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthocinus Acanthocinus griseus.

28.02.2018 7:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthocinus griseus Acanthocinus carinulatus.

28.02.2018 7:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthocinus griseus Acanthocinus carinulatus.

28.02.2018 7:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthocinus griseus Acanthocinus carinulatus.

28.02.2018 7:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthocinus griseus Acanthocinus carinulatus.

28.02.2018 7:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthocinus griseus Acanthocinus carinulatus.

28.02.2018 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthocinus Acanthocinus griseus.

28.02.2018 7:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Amara aenea / Confidently identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

28.02.2018 7:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Amara aenea / Confidently identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

27.02.2018 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Possibly Acanthocinus griseus in both photos. I can’t clarify it right now.

27.02.2018 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Tentatively identified / Imago / Yuriy Karpov Acanthocinus / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2018 15:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Tentatively identified / Imago / Yuriy Karpov Acanthocinus / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2018 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Minois dryas / Yuriy Karpov.

27.02.2018 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Kirinia epimenides / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2018 14:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pelosia / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2018 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Miltochrista / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2018 9:43, Yuriy Karpov:

Minois dryas Scopoli, 1763

26.02.2018 16:41, Irina Nikulina:

Kirinia epimenides

26.02.2018 16:28, Irina Nikulina:

Pelosia sp., possibly noctis

26.02.2018 15:23, Irina Nikulina:

Miltochrista sp.

25.02.2018 21:03, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, I we’ll post the photos and characteristics on the store’s website, of course, I’ll make an announcement here too. There will be options that are compatible with both the Entosphynx and the China-made devices.

25.02.2018 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

in-house production of new models, much more reliable.
Peter, I would like to see photographs of these models in the store with enlarged photographs of the fastening points, and more specific characteristics: the diameter of the fastening point, etc.

25.02.2018 20:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

25.02.2018 20:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

25.02.2018 20:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And I wonder how you got out of this situation.
I used a Chinese pen that I bought on Ali Express))) Plus, I didn’t go alone. People helped)))

25.02.2018 20:18, Peter Khramov:

It seems that the quality of fastening the hoop to the handle depends on the batch of handles. We'll try to put aside low-quality products. But even the best of these budget nets still leave much to be desired in terms of reliability. Therefore, within a month we are launching completely our own production of new models, much more reliable.

25.02.2018 18:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, what did you catch? If the Thais, then nothing surprising. Seriously though, I sympathize. And I wonder how you got out of this situation.

25.02.2018 14:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thank you, this vacation in Thailand was ruined by Chinese nets from Naturaliste. I understand - cheap is rotten. But before, a Chinese net was enough for me to travel. This time the nets broke on the first swing. After 7 minutes of working, I didn’t have a single net left (there were three).

20.02.2018 0:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Tenthredinidae / Yuriy Karpov.

20.02.2018 0:00, Peter Khramov:

At the March exhibition there will be new interesting butterfly nets, completely Made in Russia. Come take a look.

19.02.2018 23:54, Peter Khramov:

What a handsome!

19.02.2018 13:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Catocala doerriesi.

19.02.2018 13:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Catocala agitatrix.

19.02.2018 13:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Catocala streckeri.

19.02.2018 13:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cylindera inscripta Cylindera sublacerata.

19.02.2018 13:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cylindera inscripta Cylindera sublacerata.

19.02.2018 13:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuriy Karpov Upis ceramboides / Evgeny Komarov.

19.02.2018 13:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuriy Karpov Upis ceramboides / Evgeny Komarov.

19.02.2018 13:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuriy Karpov Upis ceramboides / Evgeny Komarov.

19.02.2018 13:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuriy Karpov Upis ceramboides / Evgeny Komarov.

19.02.2018 13:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuriy Karpov Upis ceramboides / Evgeny Komarov.

19.02.2018 13:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Male / Yuriy Karpov Upis ceramboides / Imago / Evgeny Komarov.

17.02.2018 9:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus rubripes / Imago / Sergeyy Tjabut Harpalus latus / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2018 17:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Wow! They have identified it after all! =)

14.02.2018 11:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pseudoophonus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.02.2018 11:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Harpalus (Pseudoophonus) sp. There is no way to determine the species - in the Far East there are a dozen species of this subgenus that cannot be identified from the photo.

13.02.2018 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.02.2018 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Abraxas / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.02.2018 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Abraxas / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.02.2018 13:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cicadellidae / Yuriy Karpov.

13.02.2018 13:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuriy Karpov Anogcodes ustulatus / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2018 13:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Tentatively identified / Yuriy Karpov Stenurella melanura / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2018 12:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Tentatively identified / Yuriy Karpov Oedemeridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2018 12:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Yuriy Karpov Carabus latreillei / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2018 12:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Unfortunately, the photograph does not allow us to say anything with certainty. But, most likely, Carabus (Trachycarabus) latreillei Fischer von Waldheim, 1820. The proportions do not match sibiricus.

12.02.2018 0:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindela Cicindela maritima.

12.02.2018 0:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindela Cicindela maritima.

11.02.2018 16:50, Igor Ivannikov:

Pseudergolis Wedar Kollar, 1848.

11.02.2018 10:33, Yuriy Karpov:

Clossiana selenis (Eversmann, 1837).

11.02.2018 10:28, Yuriy Karpov:

Erebia neriene (Böber, 1809), female. Erebia medusa does not have distinct bands.

11.02.2018 10:22, Yuriy Karpov:

Possibly Clossiana selenis.

11.02.2018 9:56, Yuriy Karpov:

Melitaea sp.

11.02.2018 9:52, Yuriy Karpov:

Tenthredinidae sp.

11.02.2018 8:14, Yuriy Karpov:

Geometridae sp.

11.02.2018 8:13, Yuriy Karpov:

Geometridae.

11.02.2018 7:51, Yuriy Karpov:

Cicindela maritima Dejean in Latreille & Dejean, 1822.

11.02.2018 7:51, Yuriy Karpov:

Cicindela maritima Dejean in Latreille & Dejean, 1822.

11.02.2018 5:50, Yuriy Karpov:

Boloria sp.

11.02.2018 5:48, Yuriy Karpov:

Melitaea sp.

11.02.2018 5:37, Yuriy Karpov:

Cicadellidae sp.

11.02.2018 5:30, Yuriy Karpov:

Argynnis paphia female.

11.02.2018 2:25, Vladimir Bobow:

I don’t even know...

09.02.2018 18:00, Otto Feldner:

Zerynthia louristana

09.02.2018 14:58, Otto Feldner: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2018 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Lopinga achine / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2018 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Coenonympha hero / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2018 12:10, Irina Nikulina:

Coenonympha hero

09.02.2018 11:29, Irina Nikulina:

Lopinga achine

09.02.2018 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Euclidia glyphica / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2018 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

09.02.2018 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Is this a Lepidoptera species even?

08.02.2018 14:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Vladimir Bobow Chrysolina graminis / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2018 14:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Apparently this is Chrysolina (Euchrysolina) graminis (Linnaeus, 1758).

08.02.2018 13:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Most likely it is Carabus (Morphocarabus) odoratus (one of its many subspecies). But there is no complete certainty from such a picture - it is a complex subgenus.

08.02.2018 12:21, Irina Nikulina:

More likely Euclidia glyphica, but there are certain doubts - is it not dentata? And there seems to be a tooth and the inner, darkened part of the median field is expanded towards the posterior edge of the fore wing and narrowed towards the costal edte (diagnostic sign), but somehow not too obvious, like in typical dentata.

07.02.2018 13:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Yuriy Karpov Carabus odoratus / Evgeny Komarov.

07.02.2018 13:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Yuriy Karpov Carabus odoratus / Evgeny Komarov.

07.02.2018 13:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Yuriy Karpov Carabus odoratus / Evgeny Komarov.

04.02.2018 20:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mycterus curculioides Mycterus tibialis.

25.01.2018 23:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, it is true!

23.01.2018 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

19.01.2018 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuriy Karpov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.01.2018 11:16, Yuriy Karpov:

Identification by Vasily Feoktistov, thank you.

18.01.2018 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lygistopterus sp.
Probably Lygistopterus sanguineus
I can’t see well from the tablet, so I ask someone to check and move it.

18.01.2018 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.01.2018 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eriocampa ovata / Vladimir Bryukhov Eriocampa umbratica / Alexander Boldyrev.

17.01.2018 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eriocampa ovata / Vladimir Bryukhov Eriocampa umbratica / Alexander Boldyrev.

17.01.2018 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eriocampa ovata / Vladimir Bryukhov Eriocampa umbratica / Alexander Boldyrev.

17.01.2018 14:06, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Alexander Boldyrev suggested that “according to Lorenz & Kraus, this is E. umbratica: along the black top of the head right up to the eyes. E. ovata has only a black spot on the “back of the head.” So please move it.

17.01.2018 13:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Calliteara pseudabietis / Irina Nikulina.

16.01.2018 11:09, Irina Nikulina:

Calliteara pseudabietis

12.01.2018 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Limenitis sydyi / Irina Nikulina.

12.01.2018 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apamea Apamea monoglypha.

12.01.2018 13:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuinae / Sergeyy Tjabut Apamea / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.01.2018 13:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Sergeyy Tjabut Xanthorhoe ferrugata / Basil Sergienko.

12.01.2018 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agapeta zoegana / Sergeyy Tjabut Agapeta hamana / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.01.2018 8:14, Anna Gerasimova:

Пожалуйста, обратите внимание на моё сообщение. Они уже выложили на своём сайте это фото с другим определением.

10.01.2018 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pimpla / Shamil Murtazin Itoplectis viduata / Andrei Humala.

10.01.2018 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pimpla / Shamil Murtazin Itoplectis viduata / Andrei Humala.

10.01.2018 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pimpla / Shamil Murtazin Itoplectis viduata / Andrei Humala.

10.01.2018 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pimpla / Shamil Murtazin Itoplectis viduata / Andrei Humala.

10.01.2018 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pimpla / Nikolai Vladimirov Pimpla turionellae / Andrei Humala.

10.01.2018 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Crocothemis servilia / Imago / Juri Palamarchuk Crocothemis erythraea / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

10.01.2018 11:07, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis sydyi

09.01.2018 23:21, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Crocothemis erythraea, male

09.01.2018 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pimpla / Nikolai Vladimirov Pimpla turionellae / Andrei Humala.

09.01.2018 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pimpla / Shamil Murtazin Itoplectis viduata / Andrei Humala.

09.01.2018 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Yuri Semejkin Ichneumonidae / Andrei Humala.

09.01.2018 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Opheltes glaucopterus / Andrei Humala.

09.01.2018 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Netelia / Andrei Humala.

09.01.2018 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Irek Yusupov Schizopyga flavifrons / Andrei Humala.

09.01.2018 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Andrei Humala.

09.01.2018 19:50, Andrei Humala:

Schizopyga flavifrons Holmgren

09.01.2018 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera Opheltes glaucopterus.

09.01.2018 19:35, Andrei Humala:

Opheltes glaucopterus L.

09.01.2018 19:35, Andrei Humala:

Netelia sp.

09.01.2018 19:33, Andrei Humala:

Opheltes glaucopterus L.

09.01.2018 19:25, Andrei Humala:

Ichneumonidae

09.01.2018 19:21, Andrei Humala:

It looks like I made a mistake (I didn't look at all the photos) - it's Itoplectis viduata Grav.

09.01.2018 19:16, Andrei Humala:

I know the species - Pimpla turionellae L.

08.01.2018 9:43, Anna Gerasimova:

По поводу этого фото получила вот такое письмо от индийских коллег:
Erebus crepuscularis is not found in the Indian subcontinent
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/erebini/erebini_1_3.php
Please remove your image from Inseccta.pro as well, to avoid confusion- http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/70832

Rachit Singh - 07/Jan/2018 17:36 Asia/Kolkata

07.01.2018 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is correct. This is a female :)
Only the female has such "ribs" on it. In addition, the male has suckers on his front legs. I don't see them here.

07.01.2018 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

07.01.2018 19:12, Yuriy Karpov:

Dytiscus marginalis, female.

06.01.2018 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Yuriy Karpov.

06.01.2018 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trichoptera Semblis phalaenoides.

06.01.2018 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trichoptera / Vladimir Bobow Semblis phalaenoides / Yuriy Karpov.

06.01.2018 8:10, Yuriy Karpov:

Semblis phalaenoides (Linnaeus, 1758)

05.01.2018 11:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erebia dabanensis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Erebia fletcheri / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

05.01.2018 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erebia dabanensis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Erebia fletcheri / Yuriy Karpov.

05.01.2018 11:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erebia dabanensis Erebia fletcheri.

04.01.2018 7:07, Yuriy Karpov:

Erebia fletcheri Elwes, 1899

04.01.2018 7:07, Yuriy Karpov:

Erebia fletcheri Elwes, 1899

04.01.2018 7:06, Yuriy Karpov:

Erebia fletcheri Elwes, 1899

02.01.2018 16:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Antheraea Antheraea pauckstadtorum.

02.01.2018 16:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Actias Actias isis.

02.01.2018 16:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Actias Actias groenendaeli.

02.01.2018 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Attacus / Imago Attacus suparmani / Male.

02.01.2018 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

This species was in the database. :)

02.01.2018 16:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Attacus Attacus paraliae.

02.01.2018 16:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Attacus Attacus crameri.

02.01.2018 16:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Attacus Attacus soembanus.

02.01.2018 15:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Solus parvifenestratus / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

02.01.2018 15:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Solus parvifenestratus / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

02.01.2018 15:04, Alex Dumchus:

Attacussoembanus (van Eecke 1933), please, add the species

02.01.2018 15:02, Alex Dumchus:

Attacus paraliae (Peigler 1985), please, add the species

02.01.2018 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Automeris illustris / Confidently identified / Leonid Savrasov.

02.01.2018 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascalapha odorata / Confidently identified / Leonid Savrasov.

02.01.2018 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euxoa glabella / Tentatively identified / Sergeyy Tjabut Xestia c-nigrum / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2018 12:09, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea pauckstadtorum (Holloway, Naumann & Nässig 1996), please, add the species

02.01.2018 12:06, Alex Dumchus:

Actias isis (Sonthonnax1897), please, add the species

02.01.2018 12:04, Alex Dumchus:

Actias groenendaeli (Röpke 1954), please, add the species

02.01.2018 11:57, Alex Dumchus:

Attacus crameri (Felder 1861), please, add the species

02.01.2018 11:51, Alex Dumchus:

Attacus suparmani (Pauckstadt & Pauckstadt 2002), please, add the species

01.01.2018 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, this is just fortune telling... Apparently this is not Galleria mellonella; mellonella has wider upper and lower wings. There is nothing more to say about this photo.

01.01.2018 16:11, Igor Ivannikov:

The species is identified as Solus parvifenestratus gabaidanus Nassig, 1989.

31.12.2017 22:07, Alex Dumchus:

Yeah, Automeris illustris

31.12.2017 11:22, Alex Dumchus:

Ascalapha odorata

30.12.2017 13:58, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Galleria mellonella apparently?

29.12.2017 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

100% female, the impression is that the butterfly has overlaid by fat, the upper wings are not spread symmetrically, some are bent. I see Galleriinae there.

28.12.2017 18:23, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Well, do you have any thoughts on this?

26.12.2017 17:19, Nikolay Grebennikov:

OK.

26.12.2017 17:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nikolay, the photograph on the mobile is not identified, but it has been suggested that it is Laodamia faecella. According to the photo that is on the forum and this one that is exhibited here, I cannot confirm this identification and the moth remains unidentified. For such photographs, quality of spreading and photography is necessary and it is highly advisable to indicate the specimen size.

26.12.2017 10:42, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Identified on December 12, 2017 as Laodamia faecella on molbiol ento forums by vidjl (Alexander).

26.12.2017 8:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xyleninae Caradrina.

26.12.2017 8:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Spaelotis suecica / Nikolay Grebennikov Xyleninae / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.12.2017 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leonid, if you know the family, indicate it in the photo identification, then the photo will be in the family, and specialists could find it. And it is advisable to remove the inscription from the author’s comments; such inscriptions are simply made in the “Comments” section.

22.12.2017 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alexandr Zhakov Callionima calliomenae / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

22.12.2017 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Dmitriy Pozhogin.

22.12.2017 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae Manduca sexta.

22.12.2017 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alexandr Zhakov Eumorpha fasciata / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

22.12.2017 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alexandr Zhakov Erinnyis crameri / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

22.12.2017 14:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alexandr Zhakov Xylophanes tersa / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

22.12.2017 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alexandr Zhakov Pseudosphinx tetrio / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

22.12.2017 13:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pseudosphinx tetrio

22.12.2017 13:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xylophanes tersa

22.12.2017 13:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Erinnyis crameri

22.12.2017 13:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eumorpha fasciatus

22.12.2017 12:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Manduca sexta

22.12.2017 12:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Callionima calliomenae

20.12.2017 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.12.2017 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.12.2017 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.12.2017 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae.

20.12.2017 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae.

20.12.2017 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.12.2017 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.12.2017 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.12.2017 2:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.12.2017 2:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.12.2017 2:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.12.2017 19:10, Leonid Savrasov: This species is identified correctly.

17.12.2017 19:10, Leonid Savrasov: This species is identified correctly.

17.12.2017 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Idaea biselata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.12.2017 13:20, Leonid Savrasov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2017 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Prosopocoilus downesi savagei (Hope, 1842) is a subsp.

15.12.2017 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus downesi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

15.12.2017 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus downesi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

15.12.2017 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus downesi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

15.12.2017 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus downesi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

15.12.2017 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus downesi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

15.12.2017 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus downesi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

15.12.2017 18:14, Yuri Rogozin: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2017 18:13, Yuri Rogozin:

Prosopocoilus savagei

15.12.2017 18:12, Yuri Rogozin: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2017 18:12, Yuri Rogozin:

Prosopocoilus savagei

14.12.2017 21:41, Irina Nikulina:

I think that it's Idaea biselata

13.12.2017 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Mamestra brassicae / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.12.2017 16:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmia trapezina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.12.2017 16:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Olivenebula oberthueri / Irina Nikulina.

13.12.2017 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cirrhia tunicata / Irina Nikulina.

12.12.2017 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then correct it in "photos" section of your personal account.

12.12.2017 17:44, Nikolay Grebennikov:

the year of capture is certainly not 2030).

11.12.2017 11:19, Irina Nikulina:

Olivenebula oberthueri

11.12.2017 10:02, Irina Nikulina:

Cirrhia tunicata

08.12.2017 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Neptis alwina / Irina Nikulina.

06.12.2017 15:40, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis alwina

06.12.2017 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It was worth upload this beetle photo for the sake of the label only...
The first beetle from North Korea on the website :)
In my opinion, those people who catch there are brave ones....

05.12.2017 20:49, Anna Gerasimova:

всё-таки Lymantria bivittata

03.12.2017 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Stenurella bifasciata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.12.2017 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Macropis fulvipes Macropis europaea.

02.12.2017 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Macropis fulvipes Macropis europaea.

02.12.2017 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Macropis fulvipes Macropis europaea.

02.12.2017 20:23, Vladimir Bryukhov:

All three photos of this male should be moved to Macropis europaea.
The male Macropis europaea has a black upper lip rather than yellow, unlike Macropis fulvipes.
Identification of the species from a photo - Timofey Levchenko.

02.12.2017 7:50, Alex Dumchus:

Wild female - not bred. Very large, laid several eggs.

30.11.2017 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gymnomerus laevipes Gymnomerus laevipes scandinavus.

30.11.2017 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gymnomerus laevipes Gymnomerus laevipes scandinavus.

30.11.2017 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gymnomerus laevipes Gymnomerus laevipes scandinavus.

30.11.2017 10:17, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Maybe it would be wise to transfer it to the subspecies Gymnomerus laevipes scandinavus, which is not yet in the database?

28.11.2017 21:31, Anna Gerasimova:

Everes lacturnus IMHO

28.11.2017 21:21, Anna Gerasimova:

Euchrysops cnejus

28.11.2017 21:18, Anna Gerasimova:

Deudorix epijarbas

27.11.2017 23:32, Irina Nikulina:

According to the illustrations and description in the book by V.S. Kononenko, I suppose this is Acronicta concerpta

26.11.2017 1:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Perhaps this is the smallest Saturnia that I have in my collection.
It is even smaller than the well-known Drepana falcataria....
Marvelous )))

25.11.2017 0:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

25.11.2017 0:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.11.2017 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Denis Potanin.

21.11.2017 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Elophila nymphaeata / Irina Nikulina.

21.11.2017 11:16, Irina Nikulina:

Elophila nymphaeata

18.11.2017 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pareronia valeria Pareronia anais.

18.11.2017 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pareronia valeria Pareronia anais.

18.11.2017 20:04, Igor Ivannikov:

Pareronia anais anais Lesson,1837.

17.11.2017 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Philaronia Philaronia nigrifrons.

17.11.2017 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Philaronia Philaronia nigrifrons.

17.11.2017 17:43, Vera Volkotrub:

Philaronia nigrifrons

17.11.2017 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Denis Potanin.

17.11.2017 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Denis Potanin.

17.11.2017 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Denis Potanin.

17.11.2017 12:06, Nikolay Grebennikov:

)

17.11.2017 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus thersites-thestylis Polyommatus thersites.

17.11.2017 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, I moved it somehow wrong from my phone, now I fixed it :)

17.11.2017 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus thersites-thestylis Polyommatus thersites.

17.11.2017 9:43, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Thank you, Alexander.

17.11.2017 7:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Melitaea minerva / Imago Melitaea ala / Male.

17.11.2017 7:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hyponephele davendra Hyponephele dysdora.

17.11.2017 7:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hyponephele davendra Hyponephele dysdora.

17.11.2017 7:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hyponephele davendra Hyponephele dysdora.

16.11.2017 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.11.2017 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Nikolay Grebennikov Polyommatus thersites-thestylis / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.11.2017 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Nikolay Grebennikov Polyommatus thersites-thestylis / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.11.2017 19:13, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Any thoughts on this?

16.11.2017 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Lajonquierea derunoides.

16.11.2017 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Robot Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2017 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hydrillodes morosa / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2017 14:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hydrillodes morosa / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2017 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Lajonquierea variabile / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2017 11:39, Irina Nikulina:

Hydrillodes morosa

16.11.2017 11:39, Irina Nikulina:

Hydrillodes morosa

16.11.2017 0:39, Irina Nikulina:

Lajonquiereasp. I incline to to Lajonquierea variabile

16.11.2017 0:34, Irina Nikulina:

Lajonquierea derunoides, most likely.

15.11.2017 0:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Antheraea pernyi / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Antheraea roylei / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

15.11.2017 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Antheraea lampei Antheraea roylei.

15.11.2017 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Antheraea lampei Antheraea roylei.

14.11.2017 22:51, Igor Ivannikov:

Antheraea roylii korintjiana Bouvier,1928.

14.11.2017 22:49, Igor Ivannikov:

Antheraea roylii korintjiana Bouvier,1928.

14.11.2017 15:42, Irina Nikulina:

Eucyclodes sp.

14.11.2017 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Maxates thetydaria / Irina Nikulina.

14.11.2017 13:38, Irina Nikulina:

I think that this is not Hemistola sp, а Maxates sp. Most likely, Maxates extrambigua http://dearlep.tw/species.html?namecode=344886&photo_id=295214a908514fdad81be349c082994d

14.11.2017 13:31, Irina Nikulina:

Maxates thetydaria

14.11.2017 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amaricampa Amaricampa manana.

14.11.2017 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amaricampa Amaricampa manana.

14.11.2017 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Amaricampa manana (Schaus, 1939) is also not in the database.
http://cahurel-entomologie.com/gs/index.php?id=amaricampa#!prettyPhoto[amaricampa]/0/
I’m saving what these comrades didn’t have time to eat: https://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/67759
It’s a shame: I flushed the whole mattress with Heliconiini down the toilet (((Only the wings remained......

14.11.2017 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cherished memory!

14.11.2017 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Saturniidae Caligula japonica.

14.11.2017 10:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lirimiris Lirimiris pennipenis.

14.11.2017 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lirimiris Lirimiris pennipenis.

14.11.2017 10:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

In the boldsystem there is no geography of distribution; it indicates the geography of specific specimen that are listed on the website. :) Now let's add the species. :)

14.11.2017 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Adeloneivaia Adeloneivaia kawiana.

14.11.2017 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Adeloneivaia Adeloneivaia kawiana.

14.11.2017 1:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Anatoly Marusov.

14.11.2017 1:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Anatoly Marusov.

14.11.2017 1:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Phiditia lucernaria.

14.11.2017 1:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Phiditia lucernaria.

13.11.2017 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lirimiris pennipenis Thiaucourt, 1997 is also not in the database.
http://v3.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=306080
Here it is from French Guiana:
http://cahurel-entomologie.com/gs/index.php?id=lirimiris
The geography on boldsystems cannot be fully trusted.

13.11.2017 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cherished memory!

13.11.2017 18:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, the link seems to convince me. I'll add the species and put the moth in place. :)

13.11.2017 18:12, Irina Nikulina:

Caligula japonica
For a year now we haven’t had pictures in our gallery with a familiar background – this is what the walls of the building of the BPI FEB RAS look like. Today is a year since Yuriy Semeikin passed away. Lena added a photo on such a familiar background - and my heart ached... Let's remember Yuriy. Cherished memory!

13.11.2017 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Because I know :)
Alexander, look it up on boldsystems: http://v3.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=457659.
There are underside of wings.
P.S. Do you have an account on Facebook? If so, add me as a friend (I’m there under my name). The fact is that there is a group for them, where I put them in parallel for verification. You can follow it yourself :)
In any case, you need to do the genus revision. If the species were in the database, I would have attached it to the species as I have no doubt.

13.11.2017 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, why did you decide that it was this species? In the genus they are basically similar, but your moth is very different from http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Adeloneivaia%20kawiana.htm

13.11.2017 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adeloneivaia kawiana (Brechlin & Meister 2011) - not in the database.
Kaw is located not far from the place of capture (see the map) :).

13.11.2017 16:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Sineugraphe / Irina Nikulina.

13.11.2017 12:31, Irina Nikulina:

Sineugraphe sp. I would say that of the three species living in Primorye, the most likely is Sineugraphe oceanica (based on images on Japanese websites).

10.11.2017 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

10.11.2017 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

10.11.2017 18:18, Irina Nikulina:

It’s actually there, Alexander, when I was in doubt, I also went through Leucania) But other species are quite common there - and megaproctis, yu, curvilinea...

10.11.2017 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, it’s not just the angle, the structure of the pattern is different, I would say it's something very much like Leucania loreyi, but it doesn’t seem to be in that location.

10.11.2017 17:01, Irina Nikulina:

I also had doubts, but I saw that the author, Dr. S. K. Duttamajumder is the head of the Department of Plant Protection at the Indian Sugarcane Institute, separata has sugarcane as its food plant [306], there seems to be no mistake... Maybe the angle is not very good?

10.11.2017 11:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Elena Volynets Euplexia japonica / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2017 11:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.11.2017 11:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is something else.

10.11.2017 11:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Elena Volynets Mythimna separata / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2017 11:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Elena Volynets Pygopteryx suava / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2017 11:41, Irina Nikulina:

Euplexia japonica

10.11.2017 11:40, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna separata

10.11.2017 11:40, Irina Nikulina:

Pygopteryx suava

09.11.2017 17:06, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Thank you all for your help in identification).

09.11.2017 14:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

09.11.2017 14:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

09.11.2017 3:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Respect to A. Boldyrev :)
Identification by a caterpillar of unknown origin — and straight to the point :)

09.11.2017 3:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

09.11.2017 2:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.11.2017 2:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.11.2017 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

There's something wrong with the color, or there's some kind of aberration, or the color enhancement didn't work correctly. I didn’t recognize it in the first instance either, I dismissed the species out of hand, even though I started looking from Apamea.

08.11.2017 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I guess I didn't recognize it :)
Although the species in my neighborhood is super ordinary. You can collect dozens of them during the night.....

08.11.2017 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Nikolay Grebennikov Apamea monoglypha / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.11.2017 20:59, Nikolay Grebennikov:

The size is really 48mm, there was no special extra work, it was just an improvement in the image, it looks like it’s really A. monoglypha), thanks).

08.11.2017 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrey Ponomarev.

08.11.2017 17:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

If the moth is 5 cm, and there was extra work with color, then it is Apamea monoglypha.

08.11.2017 14:49, Nikolay Grebennikov:

It is not similar to any of those found in our region).

07.11.2017 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lacanobia probably.

07.11.2017 13:36, Nikolay Grebennikov:

at least genus or what versions are there?

05.11.2017 10:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Several mattresses with butterflies and beetles from French Guiana were eaten into trash (
The material is thrown away, and the bug fed on it is immortalized.....

04.11.2017 19:13, Ferran Lizana:

Maybe a Messor barbarus queen?
Can you help me? Thanks.

04.11.2017 19:11, Ferran Lizana:

I think it could be Messor barbarus. Any expert to confirm it, please?

02.11.2017 14:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula Scopula eunupta.

02.11.2017 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Scopula / Basil Sergienko.

01.11.2017 14:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Ivan Pristrem Crioceris duodecimpunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

31.10.2017 9:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irek Yusupov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.10.2017 9:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera Donaciinae.

31.10.2017 9:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Donaciinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.10.2017 9:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Donaciinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.10.2017 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Donaciinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.10.2017 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.10.2017 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, I just didn’t have time to check yesterday :) I made an assumption and immediately rode off on fuss......

30.10.2017 22:32, Irina Nikulina:

I would say so too) Vasily, who is the question for?) Click on the taxon - and it’s immediately clear where it is)

30.10.2017 13:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus billbergi / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Carabus tuberculosus / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

30.10.2017 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna congrua / Sergeyy Tjabut Mythimna impura / Basil Sergienko.

30.10.2017 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis paphia is there? I would say that it's a female.

29.10.2017 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, now, I hope, let's see what species I bought in the store along with sweet peppers :)

29.10.2017 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

29.10.2017 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

29.10.2017 10:43, Basil Sergienko:

And if you take a closer look, the moth is quite ordinary. Is there M. congrua at all in Belarus?

28.10.2017 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, sorry, I forgot to note yesterday.
If possible, these should be translated into English (as the second language of the site, which is international).

28.10.2017 9:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, I mostly agree, but it’s difficult to provide labels in some languages: Chinese, Thai, Arabic, Hebrew, etc. :)

27.10.2017 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now to the point :)
I prefer to write label information for those insects that were not collected by me in the language in which the original label (which is attached to the insect), was written.
Label is a passport of an insect in an entomological collection.
P.S. Let's write in Russian for those animals that were collected/photographed in Russia and in those cases if the collector/photographer writes himself.

27.10.2017 21:32, Ivan Tislenko:

This is exactly why you need to write in Russian!

27.10.2017 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Average Russian person will read the Latin letter “H” exactly as the Cyrillic “X”.
Example: the name of the company "Henkel" in Russian sounds like "Хенкель" :)

27.10.2017 14:57, Ivan Tislenko:

No no no! This is exactly how it's pronounced it, according to English Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huelva

26.10.2017 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I guess the author of the Wikipedia article are Russians.
And the Spaniards, they are like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z29GhO7RvY :)))

26.10.2017 21:09, Ivan Tislenko:

On the contrary - if in Russian, then there are no dubious associations: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huelva

26.10.2017 18:45, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Vasily.

26.10.2017 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.10.2017 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.10.2017 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spain is a delicate matter :)
One example when it is better to fill out geography in foreign languages. In this case it is the name of the province.

25.10.2017 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrei Humala.

25.10.2017 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrei Humala.

25.10.2017 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrei Humala.

25.10.2017 2:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

24.10.2017 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Helicoverpa armigera / Tentatively identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

24.10.2017 12:16, Peter Khramov:

---

24.10.2017 6:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ptochidius Ptochidius tessellatus.

24.10.2017 6:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ptochidius Ptochidius tessellatus.

24.10.2017 5:25, Vera Volkotrub:

Ptochidius tesselatus. Identified by I. Zabaluev.

23.10.2017 20:59, Irina Nikulina:

---

23.10.2017 11:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

---

23.10.2017 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ectinus Ectinus dahuricus.

23.10.2017 7:44, Vera Volkotrub:

Ectinus dahuricus dahuricus (Candèe, 1863) - Identified by A. Prosvirov, 2017

23.10.2017 0:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Helophilus Helophilus affinis.

23.10.2017 0:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

Helophilus affinis

22.10.2017 20:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papestra biren / Vitaly Gumenuk Dypterygia scabriuscula / Andrey Ponomarev.

22.10.2017 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papestra biren / Vitaly Gumenuk Dypterygia scabriuscula / Andrey Ponomarev.

22.10.2017 19:57, Andrey Ponomarev:

Dypterygia scabriuscula

22.10.2017 19:57, Andrey Ponomarev:

Dypterygia scabriuscula

22.10.2017 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eristalinae / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Helophilus lapponicus / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

22.10.2017 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eristalinae / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Helophilus lapponicus / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

22.10.2017 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Helophilus / Helophilus eristaloidea / Fedor Ovechkin.

22.10.2017 1:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

Helophilus eristaloidea Bigot, 1882 = Helophilus frequens Matsumura, 1905 = Helophilus zodinus Matsumura, 1931 = Helophilus virgatus Coquillett, 1898 (http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/407665). See also http://www.diptera.org/NomenclatorDetail.php?Recn=557891
It should be moved to Helophilus eristaloidea.

22.10.2017 0:42, Fedor Ovechkin:

Helophilus lapponicus, tentative identification.

21.10.2017 18:28, Peter Khramov:

I'll fix it, but only in a couple of days or so. Right now we’re a little in the rush with the entomological exhibition here...

20.10.2017 21:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And we will drink. I feel sorry for sick people(((

20.10.2017 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Give me a Komsomol wedding! :--) * Komsomol wedding is wedding without alcohol drinks.

20.10.2017 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I also don’t drink anything stronger than soda these days....
The ulcer managed to be suppressed a little.

20.10.2017 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

---

20.10.2017 12:24, Peter Khramov:

Then it's most likely the apostrophe's fault. I can check/correct it a little later...

19.10.2017 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

---

19.10.2017 22:09, Peter Khramov:

---

19.10.2017 21:43, Peter Khramov:

Ehh... Shamil, let me know how it is with you.

19.10.2017 10:53, Evgeny Komarov:

It doesn’t work out for me - there’s a check at the office - we’re standing on our ears and we will still be standing for about a week :(

18.10.2017 20:33, Shamil Murtazin:

No, I don't drink alcohol. My arrival is still unclear. Tomorrow it will be clear.

18.10.2017 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, how are you today, drinking?

18.10.2017 15:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mamestra brassicae Mesapamea.

18.10.2017 15:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Mesapamea / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2017 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Mamestra brassicae / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2017 15:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Mamestra brassicae / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2017 15:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oleg Boroznov Gleba Basil.

18.10.2017 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Emmelina monodactyla / Tentatively identified / Oleg Boroznov.

18.10.2017 15:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Minois dryas / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.10.2017 15:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Timandra comae / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

18.10.2017 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Coleoptera / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2017 11:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

---

16.10.2017 12:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I will be there

15.10.2017 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ethmia quadrillella Metalampra cinnamomea.

15.10.2017 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Ethmia quadrillella / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.10.2017 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Ethmia quadrillella / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.10.2017 12:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Agrochola circellaris / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.10.2017 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mythimna albipuncta / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.10.2017 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06/19/2017 19:00, Vasily Feoktistov
Well, I’ll hang around there forever)
This will be the ninth event on my account (no absenteeism since 2010) :))))
I’ll be there for at least 1 day for sure (there are some things to do there).

12.10.2017 12:13, Peter Khramov:

I propose to slowly arrange a call over. Those who have already decided for sure that they will come - respond!

11.10.2017 8:20, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!

11.10.2017 8:18, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Dmitry!

10.10.2017 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, I don’t see any information about the time the photo was posted on the website http://insecta.pro/ru/, I have no reason not to believe you. In order to avoid such situations, if you have determined it yourself, then post it on the forum with your identification, and then they will either correct it or confirm it. If you identified it after posting it on the forum, either remove the post or correct it indicating your identification.

10.10.2017 14:05, Sergeyy Tjabut:

Thanks Alexander, I’ll try to take this into account in the future.

10.10.2017 14:00, Sergeyy Tjabut:

Dear MIV at the forum identified Agrotis exclamationis and Aphomia sociella at 22:14 10/03/2017
I posted the photos on https://insecta.pro/ru at 20:25:13 2017-10-03.
Therefore MIV was not mentioned. Before this, I always indicated the authors of identification.
If something is wrong, sorry.

10.10.2017 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Staphylinidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.10.2017 22:29, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Cimbicinae

09.10.2017 18:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Not identified.

09.10.2017 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Olethreutinae / Alex Lender Celypha lacunana / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2017 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Olethreutinae / Alex Lender Celypha lacunana / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2017 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Yuri Semejkin Telorta edentata / Irina Nikulina.

09.10.2017 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Gandaritis pyraliata / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2017 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #66441 group.

09.10.2017 9:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea pallidata / Zoran Bozovic Scopula virgulata / Basil Sergienko.

09.10.2017 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Anarta trifolii / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2017 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Not identified.

09.10.2017 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Not identified.

09.10.2017 9:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

link it with photo #66441 :)

09.10.2017 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Darya Poroshina Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2017 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus Angonyx testacea / Darya Poroshina.

08.10.2017 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Paragus / Confidently identified / Imago / Nikolai Vladimirov Paragus tibialis / Tentatively identified / Male / Fedor Ovechkin.

08.10.2017 18:04, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Yes, I wanted to write candidella, I just got distracted and wrote another one, thank you)

08.10.2017 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Irek Yusupov Paragus tibialis / Tentatively identified / Female / Fedor Ovechkin.

08.10.2017 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Irek Yusupov Paragus tibialis / Tentatively identified / Female / Fedor Ovechkin.

08.10.2017 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Irek Yusupov Paragus tibialis / Tentatively identified / Female / Fedor Ovechkin.

08.10.2017 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's done :)
Alexander and everyone, please point out such things if you find them.
I will link/unlink the group, and also update the angle (top/bottom) if required.
I just can’t track all these glitches on my own....

08.10.2017 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #62621 group.

08.10.2017 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

62622 and 62621 are not associated in one group. We need to link them. :)

08.10.2017 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Dmitriy Pozhogin.

08.10.2017 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae Angonyx testacea.

08.10.2017 10:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.10.2017 10:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

V. Alesenko Roman Ishin.

08.10.2017 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ethmia delliella / Nikolay Grebennikov Ethmia candidella / V. Alesenko.

08.10.2017 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ethmia delliella is a neo-Arctic species (http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=0993), it has nothing to do in the Orenburg city, it’s just an ordinary Ethmia candidella, as you were said on the forum.

08.10.2017 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not your identification, please, be correct and put the author of the identification or the resource where it was defined for you.

08.10.2017 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not your identification, please, be correct and put the author of the identification or the resource where it was defined for you.

08.10.2017 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Please be correct, put the author of the identification or the resource where it was defined for you.

08.10.2017 8:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pontia edusa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.10.2017 8:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.10.2017 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lampides boeticus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2017 17:11, Irina Nikulina:

Pontia edusa

07.10.2017 17:05, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena phlaeas

07.10.2017 16:59, Irina Nikulina:

Lampides boeticus

02.10.2017 21:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

02.10.2017 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

30.09.2017 20:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lampyridae / Irina Nikulina Luciola mongolica / Evgeny Komarov.

30.09.2017 20:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irina Nikulina Popillia / Evgeny Komarov.

30.09.2017 19:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irina Nikulina Rutelinae / Evgeny Komarov.

30.09.2017 19:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irina Nikulina Exomala pallidipennis / Evgeny Komarov.

30.09.2017 10:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lagria Lagria rufipennis.

30.09.2017 10:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irina Nikulina Lagria / Evgeny Komarov.

29.09.2017 23:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Paragus tibialis, ♂, but not sure

29.09.2017 22:30, Fedor Ovechkin:

Paragus tibialis, ♀, tentative

29.09.2017 22:30, Fedor Ovechkin:

Paragus tibialis, ♀, tentative

29.09.2017 22:30, Fedor Ovechkin:

Paragus tibialis, ♀, tentative

29.09.2017 19:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues! There are two great resources on hawkmoths, which I believe are well known to many: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/sphinx/ and http://tpittaway.tripod.com/sphinx/. Plus there are plenty of resources on hawkmoths from other macroregions! There are no particular problems with this group (an amateur’s view).

28.09.2017 10:08, Vladimir Bryukhov:

The wing pattern is somehow different from Rhagoletis cerasi...

28.09.2017 10:06, Vladimir Bryukhov:

This is Urophora.

28.09.2017 9:46, Irek Yusupov: This species is identified correctly.

27.09.2017 21:35, Peter Khramov:

It's done.

27.09.2017 20:36, Peter Khramov:

The links in the users comments are active now (for the Insecta.pro internal pages so far) and the links automatically transform according to language you choose for the website pages displaying.

27.09.2017 19:51, Peter Khramov:

-

27.09.2017 18:34, Irek Yusupov:

Anapus longicornis ?

27.09.2017 17:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Melanthia procellata / Irina Nikulina.

27.09.2017 11:24, Shamil Murtazin:

-

27.09.2017 11:02, Irina Nikulina:

Melanthia procellata

26.09.2017 23:58, Peter Khramov:

-

26.09.2017 21:32, Evgeny Komarov:

-

26.09.2017 19:41, Peter Khramov:

-

26.09.2017 14:01, Peter Khramov:

-

26.09.2017 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Reduviidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2017 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Reduviidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2017 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2017 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2017 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2017 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2017 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.09.2017 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrius convolvuli / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

26.09.2017 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Halictidae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

26.09.2017 12:12, Vladimir Deryabin:

Agrius convolvuli?

26.09.2017 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

-

26.09.2017 10:30, Shamil Murtazin:

-

25.09.2017 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anisosticta Anisosticta sibirica.

25.09.2017 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Phrixolepia sericea / Irina Nikulina.

25.09.2017 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Phrixolepia sericea / Irina Nikulina.

25.09.2017 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Phrixolepia sericea / Irina Nikulina.

25.09.2017 12:27, Vera Volkotrub:

Anisosticta sibirica

25.09.2017 11:23, Irina Nikulina:

Phrixolepia sericea

24.09.2017 16:19, Peter Khramov:

-

24.09.2017 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

09.20.2017 0:52, Petr Khramov
Alexander, we don’t remove from other genera, but we transfer species, don’t we? Or what situation are you talking about?
Peter, you're right, we're moving it. But when we add new species that are not in the genus on the site, we do not always work very carefully, we forgot to check for the presence of this species in other genera, then one genus combination was removed and others were not, then there was an error in the name on the site and the search engine did not find it finds.

24.09.2017 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Amphipyra perflua is a rather large noctuid, while Oligia strigilis is, on the contrary, quite small. We can't see it in the photo, but the author of the photo should remember. :)

24.09.2017 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra perflua / Sergeyy Tjabut Oligia strigilis / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2017 8:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

22.09.2017 21:54, Peter Khramov:

Uff... But I still have to translate this into English... :--)

22.09.2017 16:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

They take bait quite well, it’s hard to catch in the air, like all Euthalia species.

22.09.2017 16:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

During a trip to Laos, the butterfly received its common name - cigarette butt. Ash on top, yellow below. Cigarette butt male)))

22.09.2017 8:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander! I'm not talking specifically about your photo! I’m just reminding Peter once again that we need to make sure that this field is required, like the “file” field - if you don’t fill it out, it won’t load the photo and the message “You forgot to fill in...” is displayed. This is what I meant by “blocking”.

21.09.2017 22:03, Alexander Zatakovoy:

Dear Colleagues! I always try to approach the issue of filling out info carefully; in this case, I filled in both the location and date of the photo. I don’t understand why we can't see the info?! I'll fix it, sorry.

21.09.2017 20:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Mordellidae / Evgeny Komarov.

21.09.2017 16:56, Shamil Murtazin:

-

21.09.2017 15:54, Peter Khramov:

-

21.09.2017 12:07, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the remark that the radius does not work properly, we will check/correct. Regarding the editing - yes, before, when the data took a long time to load, there was a particularly big risk. Now the loading is much faster, this shouldn’t happen anymore. For the future, we'll block the form fields until the map and data are loaded.

21.09.2017 7:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I've encountered this a couple of times already. This happens if you rush to edit a geopoint. After all, the radius always turns out to be zero when creating it (no matter what you set there right away) and only when editing can you set its actual size (I already wrote about this once). But, if you didn’t wait for the name and other parameters of the point to appear when you started editing (and this happens due to many things), but quickly changed the radius and clicked “save data”, the point “flies away” to the shores of Africa, and always exactly to this very place :)

20.09.2017 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, is there some problem with the map marker?

20.09.2017 23:26, Peter Khramov:

On the general map, the loading speed has not yet changed (because all the geo markers are loaded at once, but then there is no additional loading during operation), but to make it at least obvious that this same loading is in progress, the corresponding twister will now be displayed.
In the future, we will try to make sure that the markers on the general map are loaded bit by bit.

20.09.2017 23:24, Peter Khramov:

It is necessary not to block, but to remind the user to enter geography, if possible. And not only when uploading, but also later, for example, through an email newsletter. This is in the plans.

20.09.2017 23:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pieris napi / Tentatively identified / Imago / Sergeyy Tjabut Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

20.09.2017 20:30, Evgeny Komarov:

IN MY OPINION. It's time to block the uploading of pictures without filling out the "place of catching/filming" field! Here the author (who added the geography to his previous photographs) clearly simply forgot to fill it out, but if the photo had not uploaded without filling out this field, everything would have been OK. Peter! We need to do this already. All moderators are FOR it! We've been talking about this for years now.

20.09.2017 20:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Pieris brassicae, male

20.09.2017 20:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Libellula fulva, female

20.09.2017 14:08, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, it won’t make a difference for the reputation whether the identification is indicated in the comment or right under the photo (and you can always indicate that the identification is based on a photo). But for a more explicit display and, for example, for searching by the person (who identified) - it can be very convenient. Of course, only with the consent of the person himself.

20.09.2017 11:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identification of a specimen and identification from a photo are two big differences. Matov is a world-class specialist and it is not worth putting his name under the photos that he advised, and sometimes tentatively. The text indicates that he expressed his opinion.

20.09.2017 8:49, Evgeny Komarov:

I seriously doubt that Alexey will agree, but I’ll try.

20.09.2017 0:52, Peter Khramov:

19.09.2017 19:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

19.09.2017 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, is it possible to make an account for Mr. Matov? He has identified a lot of photos.

19.09.2017 16:53, Irek Yusupov:

Derephysia ?

19.09.2017 16:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes!

19.09.2017 16:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

19.09.2017 16:19, Peter Khramov:

To uncertain ones?

19.09.2017 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

19.09.2017 15:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eublemma Eublemma griseola.

19.09.2017 15:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eublemma Eublemma griseola.

19.09.2017 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eublemma Eublemma griseola.

19.09.2017 15:05, Evgeny Komarov:

I hope I can do it!

19.09.2017 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, the time is the non-stop problem ;--) As for Plecoptera — I'll see to it.

19.09.2017 13:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

19.09.2017 13:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I'll try to upload some photos for the non-illustrated Coleoptera families, may be 20 or so! If I can find time...

19.09.2017 12:38, Peter Khramov:

19.09.2017 11:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Vladimir Bobow Camponotus saxatilis / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2017 11:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina Chrysolina virgata.

19.09.2017 11:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina Chrysolina virgata.

19.09.2017 11:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina Chrysolina virgata.

19.09.2017 11:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina Chrysolina virgata.

19.09.2017 11:07, Shamil Murtazin:

19.09.2017 11:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Carebara diversa or Pheidole sp. Identification by Victor Kozhaev.

19.09.2017 10:50, Shamil Murtazin:

There are photos of Plecoptera on the website, but they are identified to upper than species taxa.

19.09.2017 3:57, Vera Volkotrub:

Chrysolina virgata

19.09.2017 1:07, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen! We've got some orders and many families without any photos! Please, if you can, upload photos with insects from these taxa (if you've got any). But any other photos are very appreciated too :--)
In alphabetic order.

The Insects orders without photos
Archaeognatha Embioptera Mantophasmatodea Plecoptera Siphonaptera Strepsiptera Zoraptera Zygentoma
The Insects families without photos

Blattodea

Cryptocercidae Ectobiidae Kalotermitidae Lamproblattidae Nocticolidae Polyphagidae Rhinotermitidae Termitidae Termopsidae Tryonicidae

Coleoptera

Acanthocnemidae Agapythidae Agyrtidae Alexiidae Amphizoidae Archeocrypticidae Artematopodidae Belidae Belohinidae Biphyllidae Boganiidae Brachypsectridae Brachypteridae Brentidae Callirhipidae Cerophytidae Chelonariidae Clambidae Corylophidae Crowsoniellidae Cupedidae Cybocephalidae Dascillidae Dasytidae Derodontidae Diphyllostomatidae Discolomatidae Drilidae Dryopidae Eccoptarthridae Elmidae Eobelidae Epimetopidae Eucinetidae Eucnemidae Georyssidae Gietellidae Gyrinidae Hydraenidae Hydrochidae Hydroscaphidae Hygrobiidae Ithyceridae Jacobsoniidae Jurodidae Kateretidae Latridiidae Limnichidae Lutrochidae Micromalthidae Nemonychidae Nosodendridae Noteridae Omalisidae Omethidae Ommatidae Oxycorynidae Phengodidae Phloeostichidae Phloiophilidae Pleocomidae Prionoceridae Propalticidae Prostomidae Psephenidae Ptiliidae Ptilodactylidae Raymondionymidae Rhagophthalmidae Rhipiceridae Salpingidae Schizopodidae Scraptiidae Scydmaenidae Smicripidae Spercheidae Sphaeritidae Sphaeriusidae Sphindidae Synchroidae Telegeusidae Tetratomidae Thanerocleridae Torridincolidae Trachypachidae Trogositidae

Dermaptera

Anisolabididae Carcinophoridae Chelisochidae Pygidicranidae Spongiphoridae

Diptera

Acartophthalmidae Acroceridae Agromyzidae Anisopodidae Anthomyzidae Apioceridae Apsilocephalidae Asteiidae Atelestidae Athericidae Aulacigastridae Australimyzidae Austroleptidae Axymyiidae Blephariceridae Bolithophilidae Borboropsidae Brachystomatidae Braulidae Camillidae Campichoetidae Canaceidae Canthyloscelidae Carnidae Cecidomyiidae Celyphidae Chamaemyiidae Chyromyidae Coelopidae Corethrellidae Cryptochetidae Ctenostylidae Curtonotidae Cylindrotomidae Cypselosomatidae Deuterophlebiidae Diadocidiidae Diastatidae Diopsidae Ditomyiidae Dixidae Evocoidae Fergusoninidae Glossinidae Gobryidae Helosciomyzidae Hesperinidae Hilarimorphidae Homalocnemiidae Huttoninidae Inbiomyiidae Incertae sedis Ironomyiidae Keroplatidae Lonchaeidae Lonchopteridae Lygistorrhinidae Marginidae Megamerinidae Microphoridae Milichiidae Mormotomyiidae Mycetobiidae Mycetophilidae Mydidae Mystacinobiidae Nannodastiidae Natalimyzidae Nemestrinidae Neminidae Neriidae Neurochaetidae Nothybidae Nymphomyiidae Odiniidae Oestridae Opetiidae Oreoleptidae Pachyneuridae Pantophthalmidae Pelecorhynchidae Periscelididae Perissommatidae Phaeomyiidae Phoridae Piophilidae Pipunculidae Ptychopteridae Pyrgotidae Rangomaramidae Rhiniidae Richardidae Richardiidae Ropalomeridae Scenopinidae Simuliidae Somatiidae Sphaeroceridae Strongylophthalmyiidae Synneuridae Syringogastridae Tachiniscidae Tanyderidae Teratomyzidae Tethinidae Thaumaleidae Trichoceridae Trixoscelididae Valeseguyidae Vermileonidae Xenasteiidae Xylophagidae

Ephemeroptera

Acanthametropodidae Ameletidae Ameletopsidae Ametropodidae Arthropleidae Austremerellidae Baetidae Baetiscidae Behningiidae Caenidae Chromarcyidae Coloburiscidae Coryphoridae Dicercomyzidae Dipteromimidae Ephemerellidae Ephemeridae Ephemerythidae Euthyplociidae Ichthybotidae Isonychiidae Leptohyphidae Leptophlebiidae Machadorythidae Melanemerellidae Metretopodidae Neoephemeridae Nesameletidae Oligoneuriidae Oniscigastridae Palingeniidae Polymitarcyidae Potamanthidae Prosopistomatidae Pseudironidae Rallidentidae Siphlaenigmatidae Siphlonuridae Siphluriscidae Teloganellidae Teloganodidae Tricorythidae Vietnamellidae

Hemiptera

Achilidae Achilixiidae Aclerdidae Adelgidae Aenictopecheidae Aepophilidae Aphelocheiridae Asterolecaniidae Beesoniidae Calophyidae Cantacaderidae Carayonemidae Carsidaridae Ceratocombidae Cerococcidae Cimicidae Clastopteridae Conchaspididae Corixidae Dactylopiidae Diaspididae Dipsocoridae Enicocephalidae Epipygidae Eriococcidae Flatidae Gengidae Halimococcidae Hebridae Henicocoridae Hermatobatidae Homotomidae Hydrometridae Hyocephalidae Hypochthonellidae Idiostolidae Issidae Joppeicidae Kermesidae Kerriidae Kinnaridae Lecanodiaspididae Leptopodidae Machaerotidae Macroveliidae Malcidae Margarodidae Meenoplidae Mesoveliidae Micrococcidae Microphysidae Myerslopiidae Ninidae Nogodinidae Ochteridae Oxycarenidae Pachygronthidae Peloridiidae Phacopteronidae Phenacoleachiidae Phoenicococcidae Phylloxeridae Piesmatidae Plataspidae Polyctenidae Pseudococcidae Ricaniidae Schizopteridae Stictococcidae Termitaphididae Tettigarctidae Tettigometridae Thaumastocoridae Triozidae Tropiduchidae Veliidae

Hymenoptera

Agaonidae Ampulicidae Anaxyelidae Aphelinidae Aulacidae Blasticotomidae Bradynobaenidae Ceraphronidae Chalcididae Diapriidae Dryinidae Embolemidae Encyrtidae Eoichneumonidae Eucharitidae Eulophidae Eupelmidae Evaniidae Figitidae Heloridae Heterogynaidae Ibaliidae Incertae sedis Leucospidae Maamingidae Masaridae Megalodontesidae Megaspilidae Mymaridae Mymarommatidae Ormyridae Pelecinidae Pergidae Perilampidae Platygastridae Praeichneumonidae Proctotrupidae Pteromalidae Rhopalosomatidae Roproniidae Rotoitidae Sapygidae Scelionidae Sclerogibbidae Signiphoridae Stenotritidae Stephanidae Stigmaphronidae Tanaostigmatidae Tetracampidae Torymidae Trichogrammatidae Trigonalidae Vanhorniidae Xyelidae

Lepidoptera

Acanthopteroctetidae Acrolophidae Agathiphagidae Agonoxenidae Anomoeotidae Anomosetidae Anthelidae Arrhenophanidae Axiidae Bedelliidae Carthaeidae Cecidosidae Chrysopolomidae Cimeliidae Copromorphidae Cyclotornidae Dudgeoneidae Galacticidae Heliodinidae Heliozelidae Heterobathmiidae Heterogynidae Himantopteridae Holcopogonidae Lacturidae Lemoniidae Lophocoronidae Metachandidae Millieridae Mnesarchaeidae Neopseustidae Neotheoridae Oenosandridae Palaeosetidae Palaephatidae Pantheidae Prototheoridae Pseudarbelidae Pterolonchidae Roeslerstammiidae Simaethistidae Somabrachyidae Tineodidae Urodidae Whalleyanidae Xyloryctidae

Mantodea

Acanthopidae Amorphoscelidae Chaeteessidae Eremiaphilidae Iridopterygidae Liturgusidae Mantoididae Metallyticidae Sibyllidae Tarachodidae Thespidae Toxoderidae

Mecoptera

Apteropanorpidae Bittacidae Boreidae Choristidae Eomeropidae Meropeidae Nannochoristidae Panorpodidae

Megaloptera

Corydalidae

Neuroptera

Berothidae Coniopterygidae Ithonidae Nemopteridae Nevrorthidae Nymphidae Psychopsidae Rapismatidae Sisyridae

Odonata

Amphipterygidae Argiolestidae Austropetaliidae Chlorogomphidae Devadattidae Dicteriadidae Epiophlebiidae Hemiphlebiidae Heteragrionidae Hypolestidae Isostictidae Lestoideidae Macromiidae Megapodagrionidae Neopetaliidae Pentaphlebiidae Perilestidae Petaluridae Philogangidae Philogeniidae Platystictidae Polythoridae Pseudolestidae Rimanellidae Synlestidae Synthemistidae Thaumatoneuridae

Orthoptera

Anostostomatidae Bradyporidae Charilaidae Chorotypidae Cooloolidae Cylindrachetidae Eneopteridae Episactidae Eumastacidae Euschmidtiidae Gryllacrididae Gryllidae Lathiceridae Lentulidae Lithidiidae Malgasiidae Mastacideidae Mogoplistidae Morabidae Myrmecophilidae Ommexechidae Paragryllidae Phalangopsidae Pneumoridae Podoscirtidae Prophalangopsidae Pteroplistidae Pyrgacrididae Ripipterygidae Schizodactylidae Stenopelmatidae Tanaoceridae Thericleidae Trigonidiidae Trigonopterygidae Tristiridae Xyronotidae

Phasmida

Agathemeridae Anisacanthidae Aschiphasmatidae Bacillidae Damasippoididae Diapheromeridae Heteronemiidae Heteropterygidae Prisopodidae Timematidae

Psocodea

Amphientomidae Amphipsocidae Archipsocidae Asiopsocidae Boopiidae Bovicoliidae Bryopsocidae Calopsocidae Cladiopsocidae Compsocidae Dasydemellidae Dolabellopsocidae Echinophthiriidae Ectopsocidae Electrentomidae Elipsocidae Enderleinellidae Epipsocidae Gliricolidae Goniodidae Gyropidae Haematomyzidae Haematopinidae Hamophthiriidae Hemipsocidae Hoplopleuridae Hybophthiridae Lachesillidae Laemobothriidae Lepidopsocidae Linognathidae Liposcelididae Menoponidae Mesopsocidae Microthoraciidae Musapsocidae Myopsocidae Neolinognathidae Neurostigmatidae Pachytroctidae Pecaroecidae Pedicinidae Pediculidae Peripsocidae Philopteridae Philotarsidae Polyplacidae Prionoglarididae Protroctopsocidae Pseudocaeciliidae Psilopsocidae Psoquillidae Psyllipsocidae Pthiridae Ptiloneuridae Ratemiidae Ricinidae Sphaeropsocidae Stenopsocidae Trichodectidae Trichopsocidae Trimenoponidae Troctopsocidae Trogiidae

Raphidioptera

Raphidiidae

Thysanoptera

Adiheterothripidae Aeolothripidae Fauriellidae Heterothripidae Melanthripidae Merothripidae Phlaeothripidae

Trichoptera

Anomalopsychidae Antipodoeciidae Apataniidae Atriplectididae Barbarochthonidae Beraeidae Brachycentridae Calamoceratidae Calocidae Chathamiidae Conoesucidae Dipseudopsidae Ecnomidae Glossosomatidae Goeridae Helicophidae Helicopsychidae Hydrobiosidae Hydropsychidae Hydroptilidae Hydrosalpingidae Kokiriidae Lepidostomatidae Limnocentropodidae Molannidae Odontoceridae Oeconesidae Petrothrincidae Philopotamidae Philorheithridae Phryganopsychidae Pisuliidae Plectrotarsidae Polycentropodidae Psychomyiidae Rhyacophilidae Rossianidae Sericostomatidae Stenopsychidae Tasimiidae Uenoidae Xiphocentronidae

19.09.2017 0:27, Peter Khramov:

18.09.2017 18:05, Shamil Murtazin:

18.09.2017 14:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Vera Volkotrub Lixus divaricatus / Evgeny Komarov.

18.09.2017 14:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub Lixus divaricatus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

18.09.2017 14:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Sergeyy Tjabut Gomphus vulgatissimus / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

18.09.2017 14:09, Evgeny Komarov:

It's not resembling to L. (Ortholixus) amurensis Faust, 1887. http://coleop123.narod.ru/key/opredslon/Lixus_amurensis.jpg.
I guess it's Lixus (Eulixus) divaricatus Motschulsky, 1860.

18.09.2017 14:05, Peter Khramov:

18.09.2017 10:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 10:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 10:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 10:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 10:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 10:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 10:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 10:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 10:18, Vera Volkotrub:

Lixus amurensis? There is no such species at the Insecta.pro.

18.09.2017 9:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 9:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 9:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

18.09.2017 9:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pterostichus niger / Sergeyy Tjabut Pterostichus melanarius / Evgeny Komarov.

18.09.2017 9:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pterostichus niger / Sergeyy Tjabut Pterostichus melanarius / Evgeny Komarov.

18.09.2017 8:23, Shamil Murtazin:

18.09.2017 1:14, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, don't forget about identification author's label.

17.09.2017 21:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Carcharodus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.09.2017 18:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago Orthetrum coerulescens / Male.

17.09.2017 15:39, Irek Yusupov:

Minettia lupulina?

17.09.2017 15:17, Irek Yusupov:

Lauxaniidae ?

17.09.2017 14:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Stictocephala Stictocephala bisonia.

17.09.2017 14:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Stictocephala Stictocephala bisonia.

17.09.2017 14:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Zygoptera / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Erythromma najas / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.09.2017 14:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Sympetrum meridionale / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.09.2017 14:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Lestes barbarus / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.09.2017 14:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Zygoptera / Imago / Irek Yusupov Platycnemis pennipes / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.09.2017 14:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Anna Gerasimova Anax parthenope / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.09.2017 14:19, Irek Yusupov:

Stictocephala bisonia ?

17.09.2017 14:08, Peter Khramov:

17.09.2017 13:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calosoma Calosoma lugens.

17.09.2017 13:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calosoma Calosoma lugens.

17.09.2017 13:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calosoma Calosoma lugens.

17.09.2017 13:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calosoma Calosoma lugens.

17.09.2017 13:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calosoma Calosoma lugens.

17.09.2017 13:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calosoma Calosoma lugens.

17.09.2017 9:46, Irina Nikulina:

17.09.2017 9:35, Vera Volkotrub:

16.09.2017 21:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Anax parthenope, female

16.09.2017 21:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis pennipes, male

16.09.2017 21:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Gomphus vulgatissimus, male

16.09.2017 21:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Orthetrum cancellatum, female

16.09.2017 21:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Erythromma najas, male

16.09.2017 21:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Coenagrion puella

16.09.2017 21:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum meridionale, male

16.09.2017 21:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Orthetrum coerulescens, male

16.09.2017 21:02, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Lestes barbarus, female

16.09.2017 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.09.2017 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2017 1:48, Peter Khramov:

If the detailed information with references (Species Pages) is available only in a foreign language, it is now available at English version of the website (it's better then nothing until the day comes when we've got a decent translatioin).

16.09.2017 1:45, Peter Khramov:

16.09.2017 0:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Ferran Lizana Camponotus cruentatus / Shamil Murtazin.

16.09.2017 0:01, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Tentatively identified / Ferran Lizana Camponotus cruentatus / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

15.09.2017 23:47, Peter Khramov:

15.09.2017 23:12, Irek Yusupov:

Sarcophaga carnaria ?

15.09.2017 21:40, Irek Yusupov:

Rhagoletis cerasi ?

15.09.2017 21:39, Irek Yusupov:

15.09.2017 20:42, Peter Khramov:

15.09.2017 20:34, Peter Khramov:

15.09.2017 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Here is the template: ##Papilio-machaon## (# change to @).

15.09.2017 19:55, Shamil Murtazin:

15.09.2017 19:47, Shamil Murtazin:

15.09.2017 19:40, Shamil Murtazin:

15.09.2017 19:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Irek! You can use double @ to make hyperlink of the species name:
Rhagoletis cerasi

15.09.2017 17:02, Peter Khramov:

So, let's play nice and discuss problems, if they appear without rushing into extremes. If someone doesn't photo dead specimen in principle, then he has right to their beliefs. Whoever collects insects, has the same rights to his own. Peace, love and understanding!

15.09.2017 16:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I will also check the definitions of the species.

15.09.2017 16:20, Evgeny Komarov:

I wanted to write the same thing! Let's be polite! Vasily made not a good joke, and as a result conflict came out of the blue! And I know Alexey's photos very well - he has an excellent macro (and not only them).

15.09.2017 16:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And why did you correct my post? It's not about misunderstanding, it's about being adequate, not emphasizing "carrion" like this. And photographer should be more selective. Laos locations were great, but photos could be better.

15.09.2017 16:19, Peter Khramov:

15.09.2017 16:11, Peter Khramov:

15.09.2017 15:14, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, let's calm down. It's just online-misunderstanding between photographers and biologists...

15.09.2017 15:11, Peter Khramov:

15.09.2017 14:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

15.09.2017 13:40, Irek Yusupov:

Rhagoletis cerasi ?

15.09.2017 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.09.2017 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.09.2017 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

I've added the new species: Dicallomera nivalis (Staudinger, 1888) (according to
http://boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=392956
http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/Lymantr.htm
And here http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Gynaephora_Fascelina we can see it as Gynaephora fascelina (Linnaeus, 1758).
Gynaephora nivalis (Staudinger, 1887) is from molbiol.ru.
I'm not sure if to link the photo to the Dicallomera nivalis or change the genus.

15.09.2017 11:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea camaralzeman camaralzeman / Female.

15.09.2017 11:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea camaralzeman camaralzeman / Female.

15.09.2017 11:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea camaralzeman camaralzeman / Male.

15.09.2017 11:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea camaralzeman camaralzeman / Male.

15.09.2017 10:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea phaenareta drucei / Male.

15.09.2017 10:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea phaenareta drucei / Male.

15.09.2017 10:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea modesta modesta / Male.

15.09.2017 10:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea modesta modesta / Male.

15.09.2017 10:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Tanaecia lepidea.

15.09.2017 10:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Tanaecia lepidea / Male.

15.09.2017 10:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Morpho.

15.09.2017 10:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Morpho.

15.09.2017 10:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Morpho.

15.09.2017 10:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Erebus Erebus ephesperis.

15.09.2017 10:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Erebus Erebus macrops.

15.09.2017 10:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Erebus Erebus macrops.

15.09.2017 10:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Roger Dolorosa Erebus / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.09.2017 8:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

"Dead things experts", "ento pins specialists", what a wonderfull definitions for us ))

14.09.2017 23:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is it Laos? I'm not sure in the species identification.

14.09.2017 23:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

14.09.2017 21:44, Peter Khramov:

14.09.2017 16:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.09.2017 16:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

14.09.2017 16:48, Peter Khramov:

14.09.2017 16:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

14.09.2017 15:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Alexander Zatakovoy.

14.09.2017 15:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Alexander Zatakovoy Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.09.2017 15:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

14.09.2017 13:26, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, only the photo author can see the original file name ;--)

14.09.2017 6:57, Evgeny Komarov:

The file name is Gynaephora nivalis!

13.09.2017 22:49, Peter Khramov:

I can't see the species name in the photo's caption...

13.09.2017 21:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Gynaephora nivalis (Staudinger, 1887) — see the photo's name.

13.09.2017 21:28, Peter Khramov:

13.09.2017 20:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Which one?

13.09.2017 19:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Please, add the species.

13.09.2017 16:59, Evgeny Komarov:

13.09.2017 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Svetlana Shchavelina Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 13:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 13:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 13:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Robot Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 13:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Robot Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 13:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Robot Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 13:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Robot Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Robot Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 11:38, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, there is "Quote" button above comment field)

13.09.2017 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

13.09.2017 9:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

13.09.2017 9:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Evgenia, are you kidding?)

13.09.2017 9:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ericeia rectifascia.

13.09.2017 9:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Anoratha paritalis.

13.09.2017 9:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Arcte modesta.

13.09.2017 9:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Xenochroa ferrinigra / Tentatively identified.

13.09.2017 9:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Xenochroa ferrinigra / Tentatively identified.

13.09.2017 8:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Limacodidae.

13.09.2017 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 8:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 8:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Svetlana Shchavelina Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.09.2017 8:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Imago Appias drusilla boydi / Female.

13.09.2017 8:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Imago Appias drusilla boydi / Female.

12.09.2017 23:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Odontopera bidentata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.09.2017 23:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

12.09.2017 22:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae Eurema nicippe.

12.09.2017 22:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae Eurema nicippe.

12.09.2017 22:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Mycalesis.

12.09.2017 22:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Zurobata / Tentatively identified.

12.09.2017 22:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Junonia orithya ocyale.

12.09.2017 22:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Arhopala.

12.09.2017 22:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Hasora.

12.09.2017 22:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Xanthorhoe.

12.09.2017 22:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Xanthorhoe.

12.09.2017 22:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Phaedyma columella.

12.09.2017 22:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Phaedyma columella / Tentatively identified.

12.09.2017 22:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Catochrysops panormus / Tentatively identified.

12.09.2017 22:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Lexias pardalis jadeitina / Male.

12.09.2017 22:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Theclinae / Imago Heliophorus / Male.

12.09.2017 22:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

12.09.2017 22:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Xeropteryx columbicola.

12.09.2017 21:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Eudocima aurantia.

12.09.2017 21:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Eudocima aurantia.

12.09.2017 21:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Euthalia monina kesava / Female.

12.09.2017 21:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cynitia lepidea (Bulter, 1868)

12.09.2017 21:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cynitia lepidea (Bulter, 1868) m

12.09.2017 21:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Iambrix salsala.

12.09.2017 21:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Leptotes plinius / Tentatively identified.

12.09.2017 21:44, Peter Khramov:

12.09.2017 21:43, Peter Khramov:

12.09.2017 21:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Junonia iphita iphita.

12.09.2017 21:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Junonia iphita iphita.

12.09.2017 21:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Junonia iphita iphita.

12.09.2017 21:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

12.09.2017 21:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Abaeis nicippe (Cramer, 1779)

12.09.2017 21:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Abaeis nicippe (Cramer, 1779)

12.09.2017 21:32, Irek Yusupov:

Philaenus spumarius?

12.09.2017 21:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Erebia aethiops / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 21:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Erebia aethiops / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.09.2017 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Maniolini Hyponephele lupinus.

12.09.2017 21:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 21:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

12.09.2017 21:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

12.09.2017 21:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Imago Eurema daira palmira / Female.

12.09.2017 21:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Imago Eurema daira palmira / Male.

12.09.2017 21:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Imago Eurema daira palmira / Female.

12.09.2017 21:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Imago Eurema daira palmira / Male.

12.09.2017 20:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Imago Pareronia valeria / Female.

12.09.2017 20:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.09.2017 20:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae Pareronia valeria.

12.09.2017 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

A Xanthorhoe ferrugata?

12.09.2017 20:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hyponephele lupina (Costa, 1836)

12.09.2017 20:46, Evgeny Komarov:

The protonum and elytrum are bigger than headtube, so it's conjugalis. But... Maybe dentipes too.

12.09.2017 20:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Erebia aethiops (Esper, [1777])

12.09.2017 20:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Erebia aethiops (Esper, [1777])

12.09.2017 20:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 20:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Or alta Staudinger, 1886 but there are no spots on the marginal line (upper wing) and the marginal line is unbroken (down wing). So: erate.

12.09.2017 20:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Colias erate erate (Esper, [1805])?

12.09.2017 19:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Vladimir Deryabin Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 19:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata quadrifasciata.

12.09.2017 18:33, Peter Khramov:

Coleoptera specialists, confirm please.

12.09.2017 18:29, Peter Khramov:

Melanoplini tribe or something like that — id by Vlad Proklov.

12.09.2017 18:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanoplinae / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

12.09.2017 18:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chorthippus / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

12.09.2017 18:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oedipoda / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

12.09.2017 18:25, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, I've checked it up under your account, at Opera among other browsers and I can see the markers. Try Ctrl+F5 and if nothing will change, send me screenshot of the page.

12.09.2017 18:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems like Xanthorhoe spadicearia (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

12.09.2017 18:13, Vladimir Bryukhov:

For example: http://insecta.pro/gallery/67258

12.09.2017 18:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Scotopteryx chenopodiata (Linnaeus, 1758)

12.09.2017 18:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata (Clerck, 1759)

12.09.2017 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus Rhagastis albomarginatus / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 17:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I've forgotten how it is done. Long time no see at the website. Help with technical part of the linking please.

12.09.2017 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus Rhagastis albomarginatus / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus Angonyx testacea / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus Angonyx testacea / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.09.2017 17:49, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, I remind you that you can link photo to the taxa yourself. You've got moderator's rights.

12.09.2017 17:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Erebus crepuscularis. But there is not E. crepuscularis in Palawan...

12.09.2017 17:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rhagastis albomarginatus (Rothschild, 1894)

12.09.2017 17:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Angonyx testacea (Walker, 1856)

12.09.2017 17:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Angonyx testacea (Walker, 1856)

12.09.2017 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, send me the link to the photo with this problem.

12.09.2017 17:21, Peter Khramov:

Hurray! But off course it's worth it! And look at http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery?author=1616 there are interesting Asian Rhopalocera there for identification!

12.09.2017 17:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hi all! Peter, thanks for the help with Internet connection, I'm here again! Dear sirs, you think it's worth it to upload the photos from Borneo and Lao?

12.09.2017 16:59, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Hum... I can't see the markers. Opera 47.0.2631.71.

12.09.2017 16:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Uncertain identification. Two much similar species and Mr Nikolaev thought there are but one. I linked it.

12.09.2017 16:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protaetia interruptecostata / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

12.09.2017 16:14, Peter Khramov:

12.09.2017 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, the image was zoomed. How about it now? Can you id it?

12.09.2017 13:05, Evgeny Komarov:

I confirm it too. The speed is perfect!

12.09.2017 12:08, Ivan Tislenko:

Yeah, markers' speed is very good now.

12.09.2017 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

12.09.2017 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andre Kairouz Baryshenko Andrey.

12.09.2017 11:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Andre Kairouz.

12.09.2017 11:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colias / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.09.2017 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea / Confidently identified / Dmitry Kulakov.

12.09.2017 11:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

12.09.2017 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

It may be Spiris slovenica alse. The photo quality and the specimen quality are too poor to be sure.

12.09.2017 11:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spiris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.09.2017 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Spiris.

12.09.2017 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.09.2017 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orgyia antiqua / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

12.09.2017 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orgyia antiqua / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

12.09.2017 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orgyia antiqua / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

12.09.2017 9:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Catocala / Confidently identified Catocala adultera / Tentatively identified.

12.09.2017 9:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

12.09.2017 8:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

12.09.2017 8:40, Evgeny Komarov:

It's Protaetia (Netocia) interruptocostata (Ballion, 1871) or P. (Netocia) bogdanoffi (Solsky, 1876), I can't say definitely, the image is too small.

12.09.2017 1:52, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, can you tell something about id?

12.09.2017 1:49, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, why just Catocala sp. and not Catocala adultera?

12.09.2017 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, upload the link to the publication concerning the species.

12.09.2017 1:30, Peter Khramov:

Yo, Dmirty, can you upload this staff on per specimen scale?

12.09.2017 1:21, Peter Khramov:

11.09.2017 22:42, Peter Khramov:

Me and Ihor have fixed a couple of minor bugs and now maps speed is sufficiently increased, especially on event if the photo page with map is visited by the author of the photo. For authors: you can click checkbox "Show your markers" to show/hide them.
Thanks to Ihor Kyryliuk one more time for the maps improvements.
PS. To photographers: please, confirm speed increasing.
PPS. And yes, just clear the browser cash or press Ctrl+F5 if you don't see the markers on your photo page.

11.09.2017 22:00, Fedor Ovechkin:

My markers are online again! After Ctrl+F5.

11.09.2017 19:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Yeah! It's Ok after browser's cash cleaning.

11.09.2017 19:01, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, try to refresh page with Ctrl+F5.

11.09.2017 18:58, Peter Khramov:

I've linked them. It's just so that they were in different groups already.

11.09.2017 18:56, Ivan Tislenko:

My markers are perfectly visible in Yandex Browser among other browsers.

11.09.2017 18:16, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Please, help with linking this photo to that one: http://insecta.pro/gallery/67235

11.09.2017 16:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus ripartii Polyommatus damon.

11.09.2017 16:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Athamanthia churkini Athamanthia.

11.09.2017 15:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Athamanthia churkini Athamanthia.

11.09.2017 15:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Athamanthia Athamanthia churkini.

11.09.2017 15:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Athamanthia Athamanthia churkini.

11.09.2017 13:11, Peter Khramov:

We'll see into it one more time today.

11.09.2017 11:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Eunebria Nebria psammophila.

11.09.2017 11:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Eunebria Nebria psammophila.

11.09.2017 8:53, Evgeny Komarov:

And with Yandex Browser situation is still the same. I can't see any markers.

11.09.2017 8:49, Evgeny Komarov:

It's working with Chrome! But delay is 30—40 seconds.

10.09.2017 21:04, Peter Khramov:

I've tried it at Opera and Chrome. It's working. Don't understand what's matter...

10.09.2017 20:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

10.09.2017 20:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio menatius Papilio menatius victorinus.

10.09.2017 20:53, Peter Khramov:

10.09.2017 19:14, Evgeny Komarov:

10.09.2017 17:09, Shamil Murtazin:

It's one of the species: or/or )))

10.09.2017 16:04, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, what is slash about? Synonyms or just one of the species?

10.09.2017 11:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coptosoma / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Coptosoma capitatum / Tentatively identified / Vera Volkotrub.

10.09.2017 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coptosoma / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Coptosoma capitatum / Tentatively identified / Vera Volkotrub.

10.09.2017 9:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, I've sent you the screenshot via email.

10.09.2017 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Alexandr Zhakov.

10.09.2017 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Choreutis diana / Tentatively identified.

10.09.2017 9:00, Fedor Ovechkin:

Peter, I see the markers at Edge browser but I can't see them at Chrome.

10.09.2017 8:11, Vladimir Bryukhov:

It's working but so slowly...((( And the website at large is working slowly too.

10.09.2017 5:55, Peter Khramov:

10.09.2017 5:53, Peter Khramov:

If you can't see your markers, please, send me link and screenshot, I'll see what's the problem.

09.09.2017 23:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Lasius brunneus/alienus. Identification by Victor Kozhaev.

09.09.2017 23:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Lasius cf. alienus. Identification by Victor Kozhaev.

09.09.2017 23:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Camponotus vagus/saxatilis. Identification by Victor Kozhaev.

09.09.2017 23:03, Shamil Murtazin:

09.09.2017 22:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, I can't see the markers and it's not just some lag or Internet speed.

09.09.2017 22:19, Peter Khramov:

You can meet some fonts decorations bugs earlier (inappropriate bold, italic, etc.) It's fixed now.

09.09.2017 21:39, Peter Khramov:

Fyodor, I've checked it up, it's working all right. There is some lag between base map info and markers downloading (maybe several seconds — depends on markers quantity and your Internet speed).

09.09.2017 21:28, Fedor Ovechkin:

It's not working! I can't see my markers.

09.09.2017 21:11, Peter Khramov:

It's fixed.

09.09.2017 21:10, Peter Khramov:

We've fixed it. You can see your map points on the photo page if you are the author of the photo. So it'll be easier to link your photo to your earlier markers.

09.09.2017 16:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / SK Duttamajumder.

09.09.2017 16:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Not identified.

09.09.2017 16:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

09.09.2017 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm not sure that it's Lepidoptera sp. But we've got something like that there :)

09.09.2017 16:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera.

09.09.2017 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Catarhoe cuculata / Irina Nikulina.

09.09.2017 0:16, Irina Nikulina:

Catarhoe cuculata?

08.09.2017 21:34, Peter Khramov:

08.09.2017 20:34, Peter Khramov:

08.09.2017 19:16, Ferran Lizana:

Oh. great!!
Let's wait for him.

08.09.2017 17:47, Irina Nikulina:

I don't have the Guide, but I agree, we can move it to capitatum, tentatively identified supposedly.

08.09.2017 17:44, Irina Nikulina:

08.09.2017 15:19, Evgeny Komarov:

08.09.2017 15:04, Vera Volkotrub:

I can be wrong: I am not an entomologist. But according to Far East Field Good there are 4 species of the Coptosom genus there and only capitanum's "face" is similar to one on the photo...

08.09.2017 14:16, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you! I'm not sure, it's maybe capitatum, I'll upload one more photo for more details...

08.09.2017 14:13, Irina Nikulina:

08.09.2017 13:46, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir Zryanin, our Formicidae curator, will be online early October and he'll able to help with identification then.

08.09.2017 13:12, Vera Volkotrub:

Something is not right with the specimen "face". Maybe it's C. capitatum?

08.09.2017 12:49, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, I'll indicate you as identification author since Victor is not registered website user, right?

08.09.2017 11:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.09.2017 9:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Camponotus cruentatus, id - Victor Khojaev (Виктор Кожаев)

08.09.2017 9:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Camponotus cruentatus, id - Victor Khojaev (Виктор Кожаев)

08.09.2017 0:54, Peter Khramov:

Guys, clap eyes on Dmitry's photos from interesting locations.

07.09.2017 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.09.2017 21:26, Shamil Murtazin:

07.09.2017 20:43, Ferran Lizana: This species is identified correctly.

07.09.2017 20:22, Ferran Lizana:

I need some help to identify this species, please.
Maybe Formica rufa?

07.09.2017 18:25, Irina Nikulina:

07.09.2017 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

07.09.2017 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have no use for the joint markers too.

07.09.2017 11:59, Peter Khramov:

It's done.

07.09.2017 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've got a male specimen at last. How about changing illustration for the species?

07.09.2017 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coptosoma Coptosoma chinense.

07.09.2017 8:58, Vera Volkotrub:

Сoptosoma chinense.

07.09.2017 7:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dysphania / Alex Dumchus Dysphania sagana / Ryan Brookes.

07.09.2017 7:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dysphania / Alex Dumchus Dysphania sagana / Ryan Brookes.

07.09.2017 7:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

The new species for the region, correct me if I'm wrong. And no illustrations for the Choreutis diana until now :)

07.09.2017 7:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Choreutis diana / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.09.2017 7:17, Evgeny Komarov:

I don't use them. But maybe it's only me.

07.09.2017 7:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

07.09.2017 7:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

07.09.2017 7:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Irina Nikulina.

07.09.2017 7:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eugnorisma chaldaica / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov Eugnorisma trigonica / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

07.09.2017 5:52, Vera Volkotrub:

07.09.2017 2:58, Peter Khramov:

Autosuggestions' headers will be switching to English correctly from now on.

07.09.2017 2:47, Peter Khramov:

07.09.2017 0:53, Peter Khramov:

07.09.2017 0:41, Peter Khramov:

We'll fix it in within days.

06.09.2017 22:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Getting tired of conflicted information. The species was added according to ZIN representation.

06.09.2017 22:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Imago Carabus caucasicus / Female.

06.09.2017 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphaerophoria / Irek Yusupov Sphaerophoria scripta / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.09.2017 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphaerophoria / Irek Yusupov Sphaerophoria scripta / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.09.2017 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sphaerophoria / Irek Yusupov Sphaerophoria scripta / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.09.2017 22:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Komarov.

06.09.2017 22:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, for the time being.

06.09.2017 22:09, Peter Khramov:

Did it.

06.09.2017 22:05, Peter Khramov:

To tentatively identified meanwhile?

06.09.2017 21:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov.

06.09.2017 21:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov.

06.09.2017 21:17, Evgeny Komarov:

And we don't have an trigonica here so far :)

06.09.2017 21:15, Evgeny Komarov:

I'd say it's Eugnorisma trigonica (much the same photo in "The Noctuid moths of Kyrgyzstan" book).

06.09.2017 21:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Matov told about this one, but he could be wrong... He's in away on vacation right now. He'll be back after September 12 and I'll ask him then.

06.09.2017 20:59, Evgeny Komarov:

It's all there!

06.09.2017 20:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's one of a fancy photo, not identified and nobody could it done before ;-)

06.09.2017 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Alex, see to Admin section, there is species name and a couple more photos there...

06.09.2017 20:19, Evgeny Komarov:

I'm against removal, maybe somebody'll identify it in the future...

06.09.2017 20:12, Peter Khramov:

There are many, indeed. But what with this one?)

06.09.2017 19:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Scopula immorata / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2017 19:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Scopula immorata / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2017 19:41, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

06.09.2017 19:41, Alex Dumchus:

It's definitely I. feisthamelii, I chased it unsuccessfully in Catalonia 4 years ago...

06.09.2017 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Evergestis aenealis / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2017 19:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

As if no more photos to delete at the website?)

06.09.2017 19:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

The link is to the genus, not to the species.

06.09.2017 19:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / / Robot Herminiinae / Imago / Ryan Brookes.

06.09.2017 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Isn't there an error? I was told that this is Eugnorisma trigonica and Matov identified it. Evgeny, see to it one more time, this specimen is different from other three.

06.09.2017 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Evgeny, mark the species (with author and year).

06.09.2017 16:24, Peter Khramov:

06.09.2017 15:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Add the species please! http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/noctuidae/plusiinae/euchalcia/

06.09.2017 14:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Confidently identified / Imago / Ivan Tislenko Poecilus versicolor / Tentatively identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

06.09.2017 12:57, Peter Khramov:

06.09.2017 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I've removed the double.

06.09.2017 11:32, Irek Yusupov:

05.09.2017 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.09.2017 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Ryan Brookes Lampyridae / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 22:18, Peter Khramov:

Once again I propose to get rid of joint (only joint!) map markers...

05.09.2017 21:46, Peter Khramov:

05.09.2017 21:11, Peter Khramov:

If there are no objections, I propose to move photo to the species.

05.09.2017 21:11, Peter Khramov:

Vasiliy, what do you say?

05.09.2017 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Remove maybe? Or it's not a dead end?

05.09.2017 21:08, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, check it please.

05.09.2017 21:05, Peter Khramov:

The species was transferred to Kamalia in April, 2017.

05.09.2017 21:03, Peter Khramov:

Alex, what's your opinion on the matter?

05.09.2017 21:02, Peter Khramov:

The photo was transferred to Pardoxia graellsi, but only in August 2017 :-)

05.09.2017 20:28, Fedor Ovechkin:

Sphaerophoria scripta

05.09.2017 19:39, Peter Khramov:

05.09.2017 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.09.2017 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scolia / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ichneumonidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ichneumonidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2017 15:37, Peter Khramov:

05.09.2017 15:18, Peter Khramov:

05.09.2017 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

05.09.2017 12:20, Peter Khramov:

05.09.2017 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ivan Tislenko Eugene Karolinskiy.

05.09.2017 10:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Can somebody to confirm that this is not one of Anadrymadusa retowskii?

05.09.2017 9:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaecia cocytus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.09.2017 9:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Igor Ivannikov Alex Dumchus.

05.09.2017 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaecia cocytus / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

05.09.2017 6:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Poecilus cupreus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Poecilus lepidus / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2017 6:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Poecilus cupreus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Poecilus lepidus / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2017 6:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Poecilus cupreus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2017 6:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Poecilus cupreus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2017 6:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Poecilus cupreus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2017 6:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Broscus cephalotes / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2017 6:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Broscus cephalotes / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2017 6:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Broscus cephalotes / Evgeny Komarov.

04.09.2017 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

04.09.2017 17:34, Irina Nikulina:

04.09.2017 15:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus icadius Polyommatus icarus.

04.09.2017 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Denis Potanin.

04.09.2017 14:24, Alex Dumchus:

04.09.2017 14:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Limnocarabus Carabus maacki.

04.09.2017 14:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Limnocarabus Carabus maacki.

04.09.2017 14:09, Alex Dumchus:

04.09.2017 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

04.09.2017 10:54, Vera Volkotrub:

04.09.2017 10:46, Irina Nikulina:

04.09.2017 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

04.09.2017 7:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vera Volkotrub Pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

04.09.2017 7:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vera Volkotrub Pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

04.09.2017 7:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Euphydryas / Evgeny Komarov.

04.09.2017 7:28, Alex Dumchus:

04.09.2017 7:14, Alex Dumchus:

03.09.2017 22:24, Shamil Murtazin:

03.09.2017 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's #66919 photo double.

03.09.2017 22:19, Peter Khramov:

03.09.2017 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Rhyssella obliterata / Marek Adamski.

03.09.2017 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Rhyssella obliterata.

03.09.2017 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Rhyssella obliterata.

03.09.2017 16:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.09.2017 12:42, Igor Ivannikov:

02.09.2017 21:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nebria psammodes Eunebria.

02.09.2017 21:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nebria psammodes Eunebria.

02.09.2017 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

02.09.2017 18:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

02.09.2017 18:32, Igor Ivannikov:

Cynitia stellata Saito,2004

02.09.2017 18:30, Igor Ivannikov:

Cynitia stellata Saito,2004

02.09.2017 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

02.09.2017 11:13, Peter Khramov:

02.09.2017 9:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

02.09.2017 8:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helicoverpa armigera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.09.2017 23:17, Irek Yusupov:

01.09.2017 21:30, Peter Khramov:

01.09.2017 21:29, Peter Khramov:

01.09.2017 16:19, Irek Yusupov:

01.09.2017 14:31, Evgeny Komarov:

01.09.2017 8:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spiris striata?

01.09.2017 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.09.2017 8:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.09.2017 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.09.2017 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.09.2017 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.09.2017 8:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.09.2017 5:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pepsis.

01.09.2017 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pepsis.

01.09.2017 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pepsis.

01.09.2017 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

01.09.2017 5:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Hymenoptera / Irek Yusupov.

31.08.2017 23:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Ok, I've got it. I can't share the facebook photos here (

31.08.2017 23:00, Peter Khramov:

PS. And I can't see the photo.

31.08.2017 22:59, Peter Khramov:

31.08.2017 22:59, Peter Khramov:

But what about geo markers? Are they working or not?
You can add new markers but you can't link the photos to the old ones. It's temporary and we fix it.

31.08.2017 22:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Oh, it's a shame (

31.08.2017 22:09, Peter Khramov:

31.08.2017 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only logged in to facebook can see it.

31.08.2017 21:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Is somebody see the photo?

31.08.2017 21:44, Evgeny Komarov:

I've tried to share photos from facebook here but it won't work (

31.08.2017 21:37, Evgeny Komarov:

31.08.2017 21:31, Evgeny Komarov:

As a "report about expedition"? Yeah! And some photos to it too! But what about geo markers? Are they working or not?

31.08.2017 21:22, Peter Khramov:

31.08.2017 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Heh, the new section for the such publications is wanted!

31.08.2017 19:18, Evgeny Komarov:

I am back from the expedition. It was all right, we have many new experiences :) But Eastern Pamir was not reached this year: we were about 60 km from it but one of us've got serious altitude sickness and we had to move back to Kirgizia...

31.08.2017 19:03, Evgeny Komarov:

31.08.2017 16:42, Peter Khramov:

31.08.2017 16:38, Peter Khramov:

Please be reminded, the Moscow entomological exhibition will take place from 21 to 22 of October 2017. You are welcome to participate in Insecta.pro meeting at that time! 10 years, yo!)

31.08.2017 15:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 15:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 14:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 14:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 14:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 14:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 14:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 14:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:32, Evgeny Komarov:

31.08.2017 13:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 13:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 12:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 12:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 12:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Plebejus sarta.

31.08.2017 12:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 12:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Plebejus sarta / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov Not identified.

31.08.2017 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae Calligrapha.

31.08.2017 10:35, Irek Yusupov:

The male.

31.08.2017 10:34, Irek Yusupov:

The male.

31.08.2017 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae Omophoita.

31.08.2017 10:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 10:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 10:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 10:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 9:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 8:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 7:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Stan Korb.

31.08.2017 1:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

30.08.2017 20:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mantidae Mantis religiosa.

30.08.2017 20:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mantidae Mantis religiosa.

30.08.2017 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.08.2017 16:26, Vladimir Deryabin:

30.08.2017 16:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Grammodes stolida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

30.08.2017 13:38, Irek Yusupov:

Mantis religiosa Linnaeus, 1758?

30.08.2017 13:38, Irek Yusupov:

Mantis religiosa Linnaeus, 1758?

30.08.2017 13:12, Irek Yusupov:

Sphaerophoria

30.08.2017 13:12, Irek Yusupov:

Sphaerophoria

29.08.2017 23:48, Fedor Ovechkin:

29.08.2017 11:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euzonitis Lydus.

29.08.2017 11:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mylabris / Vasiliy Feoktistov Euzonitis / Evgeny Komarov.

29.08.2017 7:51, Vladimir Deryabin:

29.08.2017 7:51, Vladimir Deryabin:

29.08.2017 7:50, Vladimir Deryabin:

28.08.2017 16:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tenebrionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Dila / Evgeny Komarov.

28.08.2017 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Evgeny, it was already sorted out: http://insecta.pro/community/66860.
There is a link to this page for you. Draw the line please :)

28.08.2017 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.08.2017 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.08.2017 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mantodea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.08.2017 13:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.08.2017 13:32, Peter Khramov:

28.08.2017 8:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

28.08.2017 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

28.08.2017 7:44, Irek Yusupov:

28.08.2017 7:32, Irek Yusupov:

27.08.2017 14:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

27.08.2017 13:07, Evgeny Komarov:

25.08.2017 16:44, Peter Khramov:

24.08.2017 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.08.2017 21:28, Peter Khramov:

24.08.2017 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylocopa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.08.2017 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Plebejus argus / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.08.2017 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Cyaniris semiargus / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.08.2017 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cucullia pustulata / Artem Strizhov.

24.08.2017 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Chiasmia clathrata / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.08.2017 9:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Spialia orbifer / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.08.2017 8:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helicoverpa armigera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.08.2017 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthodes intersepta Pardoxia graellsi.

24.08.2017 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthodes intersepta Pardoxia graellsi.

24.08.2017 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthodes intersepta Pardoxia graellsi.

24.08.2017 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthodes intersepta Pardoxia graellsi.

24.08.2017 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.08.2017 7:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Helicoverpa armigera?

24.08.2017 7:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesperiidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.08.2017 23:26, Irina Nikulina:

23.08.2017 23:04, Peter Khramov:

23.08.2017 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

23.08.2017 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.08.2017 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

23.08.2017 9:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.08.2017 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Galeruca Galeruca daurica.

23.08.2017 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Galeruca Galeruca daurica.

23.08.2017 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Galeruca Galeruca daurica.

23.08.2017 6:17, Vera Volkotrub:

22.08.2017 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

22.08.2017 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

22.08.2017 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

22.08.2017 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

21.08.2017 17:46, Alex Lender:

21.08.2017 17:31, Peter Khramov:

I've got it. We fix it.

21.08.2017 15:57, Evgeny Komarov:

We can add markers but not link photos to the old ones!

21.08.2017 15:12, Evgeny Komarov:

I've got the same! The map is blank and I can't link the photos!

21.08.2017 13:25, Nikolay Grebennikov:

21.08.2017 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

20.08.2017 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

20.08.2017 21:56, Nikolay Grebennikov:

20.08.2017 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anna Gerasimova Alexandr Zhakov.

20.08.2017 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

20.08.2017 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Poor quality. It's better in additional gallery.

20.08.2017 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysgonia algira / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.08.2017 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

19.08.2017 17:37, Alex Lender:

Melitaea diamina?

19.08.2017 11:29, Peter Khramov:

19.08.2017 9:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hydraecia Hydraecia micacea.

18.08.2017 23:01, Irina Nikulina:

Hydraecia micacea?

18.08.2017 13:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pieris / Vasiliy Feoktistov Pieris rapae / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2017 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helicoverpa armigera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2017 13:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea / Vasiliy Feoktistov Melitaea didyma / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2017 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 12:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ephemeroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ephemeroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ephemeroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agonopterix ciliella / Confidently identified / Sergeyy Tjabut.

18.08.2017 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dytiscidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieris / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Autographa gamma?

18.08.2017 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

18.08.2017 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mantodea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum stellatarum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.08.2017 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Apatura / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pyrrhia umbra?

18.08.2017 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum stellatarum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2017 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

18.08.2017 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Dolichus halensis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2017 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've made a screenshot:

There are no old markers. And it's not good at all....

16.08.2017 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, there are no earlier markers for the photos linking on the photos pages. Fix it please.

15.08.2017 15:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dahira Dahira obliquifascia.

15.08.2017 15:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dahira Dahira obliquifascia.

15.08.2017 15:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.08.2017 12:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupido / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

15.08.2017 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hecatera cappa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2017 9:36, Irina Nikulina:

15.08.2017 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cteniopinus Cteniopinus koltzei.

15.08.2017 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cteniopinus Cteniopinus koltzei.

15.08.2017 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cteniopinus Cteniopinus koltzei.

15.08.2017 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.08.2017 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Smerinthini / Anna Novikovaa Laothoe populi / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2017 9:24, Vera Volkotrub:

14.08.2017 23:57, Peter Khramov:

14.08.2017 21:58, Irina Nikulina:

14.08.2017 20:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Acrobasis injunctella / Irina Nikulina.

14.08.2017 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

14.08.2017 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Xanthocrambus lucellus / Irina Nikulina.

14.08.2017 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Belciades niveola / Irina Nikulina.

14.08.2017 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cucullia pustulata / Artem Strizhov.

14.08.2017 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amorpha juglandis Smerinthini.

14.08.2017 19:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

14.08.2017 19:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.08.2017 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

14.08.2017 15:24, Elena Stadnik:

14.08.2017 10:36, Irina Nikulina:

Laothoe populeti?

13.08.2017 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio machaon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.08.2017 22:49, Irina Nikulina:

Belciades niveola

10.08.2017 21:53, Irina Nikulina:

Xanthocrambus lucellus

09.08.2017 18:07, Irina Nikulina:

Acrobasis injunctella

09.08.2017 17:14, Artem Strizhov:

07.08.2017 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

07.08.2017 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

06.08.2017 23:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Cucullia pustulata?

06.08.2017 11:37, Artem Strizhov:

06.08.2017 11:36, Artem Strizhov:

05.08.2017 23:38, Shamil Murtazin:

05.08.2017 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.08.2017 18:34, Igor Ivannikov:

It's a male.

05.08.2017 16:27, Elena Stadnik:

05.08.2017 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.08.2017 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.08.2017 6:59, Alex Dumchus:

Faunis eumeus (Drury, [1773]

05.08.2017 6:56, Alex Dumchus:

05.08.2017 6:49, Alex Dumchus:

04.08.2017 8:52, Vladimir Deryabin:

03.08.2017 10:18, Vladimir Bryukhov:

The photo is not linked to any map marker. Is there a marker with this photo at the main map page?

I've added a marker but where are all other markers? And markers from other users? I've got only blank map on my photos pages.

02.08.2017 22:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

02.08.2017 22:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

02.08.2017 21:05, Sergey Simonin:

Cool! And that's what I planned - to collect caterpillars and bring out butterflies. For children. It's such a beauty!))

02.08.2017 20:55, Fedor Ovechkin:

I've got similar problem. I can add new marker but I can't link any photo and one of the old markders.

02.08.2017 20:46, Fedor Ovechkin:

side

02.08.2017 20:45, Fedor Ovechkin:

02.08.2017 20:45, Fedor Ovechkin:

02.08.2017 20:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

side

02.08.2017 20:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

side

02.08.2017 19:09, Peter Khramov:

The photo is not linked to any map marker. Is there a marker with this photo at the main map page?

02.08.2017 18:01, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Any of my photos. For example: http://insecta.pro/gallery/66337

02.08.2017 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, send me a link to the page with the problem.

02.08.2017 14:08, Peter Khramov:

02.08.2017 12:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You just click on the name of the species that is above the photo. And read it.
The species is not poisonous :)

02.08.2017 12:28, anna Ivanovna:

Tell me, what is it, (species name), is it poisonous? I found such a creature in the yard

02.08.2017 10:21, Vladimir Bryukhov:

It's weird. I don't see markers at all now.

02.08.2017 2:29, Sergey Simonin: This species is identified correctly.

02.08.2017 2:28, Sergey Simonin: This species is identified correctly.

02.08.2017 2:20, Sergey Simonin:

02.08.2017 1:04, Peter Khramov:

01.08.2017 15:22, Peter Khramov:

31.07.2017 15:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

31.07.2017 15:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Celastrina argiolus / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.07.2017 13:11, Peter Khramov:

31.07.2017 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.07.2017 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.07.2017 10:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.07.2017 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cetoniini / Alex Lender Cetonia aurata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.07.2017 8:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepturini / Imago / Alex Lender Anastrangalia / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.07.2017 8:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.07.2017 8:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Alex Lender Necrodes littoralis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.07.2017 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Alex Lender Cicindela campestris / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.07.2017 14:50, Peter Khramov:

30.07.2017 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomidae Menida violacea.

30.07.2017 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomidae Menida violacea.

30.07.2017 12:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomidae Carbula putoni.

30.07.2017 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomidae Carbula putoni.

30.07.2017 9:56, Vera Volkotrub:

29.07.2017 21:37, Vladimir Deryabin:

29.07.2017 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

29.07.2017 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chiasmia clathrata / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

29.07.2017 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chiasmia clathrata / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

29.07.2017 20:00, Vladimir Deryabin:

29.07.2017 20:00, Vladimir Deryabin:

29.07.2017 19:28, Vera Volkotrub:

29.07.2017 18:16, Vladimir Deryabin:

29.07.2017 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

29.07.2017 17:27, Vladimir Deryabin:

29.07.2017 17:23, Vladimir Deryabin:

29.07.2017 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

29.07.2017 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

29.07.2017 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.07.2017 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hyponephele lycaon / Vasiliy Feoktistov Maniola jurtina / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.07.2017 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiommata maera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2017 8:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiommata maera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2017 8:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

29.07.2017 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

29.07.2017 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.07.2017 23:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

28.07.2017 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.07.2017 16:33, Alex Dumchus:

Ladies and gentlemen, friends, comrades. Boris Stradomsky had a stroke. The left half of the body is paralyzed. To everyone who knows him, I ask you to support the man morally. His email: bvstr@mail.ru

28.07.2017 15:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.07.2017 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.07.2017 15:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyponephele lycaon / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.07.2017 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colias / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.07.2017 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.07.2017 15:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.07.2017 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.07.2017 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis pandora / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.07.2017 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Vladimir Bobow Spargania luctuata / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.07.2017 12:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Gluphisia crenata / Irina Nikulina.

27.07.2017 22:09, Irina Nikulina:

Gluphisia crenata

27.07.2017 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cosmia unicolor / Irina Nikulina.

27.07.2017 21:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Scotopteryx chenopodiata.

27.07.2017 21:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Irina Nikulina.

27.07.2017 21:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Samia cynthia / Confidently identified Samia luzonica / Tentatively identified.

27.07.2017 21:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zygaenidae / Evgeny Slobodskoy Rhagades pruni / Irina Nikulina.

27.07.2017 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

27.07.2017 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Vladimir Bobow Costaconvexa caespitaria / Yuri Semejkin.

27.07.2017 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Scarabaeidae Hilyotrogus bicoloreus.

27.07.2017 16:12, Vera Volkotrub:

27.07.2017 15:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

It would be good, but I'll not be able to do it :)

27.07.2017 10:13, Irina Nikulina:

27.07.2017 5:48, Vladimir Bobow:

26.07.2017 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Just think about it! Let's have some porto and interesting discussion!)

26.07.2017 1:06, Irina Nikulina:

Rhagades pruni

26.07.2017 0:34, Fedor Ovechkin:

Donacia semicuprea?

25.07.2017 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zygaenidae.

25.07.2017 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Evgeny Slobodskoy.

25.07.2017 14:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Roger Dolorosa.

25.07.2017 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm not going as yet :)

25.07.2017 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

25.07.2017 0:19, Peter Khramov:

24.07.2017 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.07.2017 13:37, Fedor Ovechkin:

24.07.2017 13:34, Fedor Ovechkin:

24.07.2017 13:32, Fedor Ovechkin:

23.07.2017 23:05, Igor Ivannikov:

Most likely it is Samia luzonica.

23.07.2017 22:12, Peter Khramov:

Alex Zhakov, could you be there, in Moscow?

23.07.2017 22:11, Peter Khramov:

23.07.2017 20:34, Nikolay Grebennikov:

23.07.2017 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

23.07.2017 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

23.07.2017 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.07.2017 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Adela / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2017 8:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xyleutes leucomochla / Confidently identified / Igal Oz.

23.07.2017 8:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Nikolay Grebennikov Aleimma loeflingiana / Vlad Proklov.

23.07.2017 8:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.07.2017 8:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.07.2017 8:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xyleutes leucomochla.

23.07.2017 8:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Igal Oz.

21.07.2017 20:11, Shamil Murtazin:

21.07.2017 12:06, Shamil Murtazin:

21.07.2017 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.07.2017 8:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2017 21:56, Vladimir Deryabin:

20.07.2017 21:56, Vladimir Deryabin:

20.07.2017 20:55, Dmitry Vtorushin:

20.07.2017 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pieris rapae?

20.07.2017 20:24, Peter Khramov:

20.07.2017 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa cardui / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2017 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epicallia villica / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

20.07.2017 20:02, Peter Khramov:

20.07.2017 19:32, Nikolay Grebennikov:

20.07.2017 19:23, Elena Stadnik:

19.07.2017 22:20, Irina Nikulina:

19.07.2017 21:18, Igal Oz:

19.07.2017 21:17, Igal Oz:

19.07.2017 13:53, Nikolay Grebennikov:

19.07.2017 11:24, Irina Nikulina:

Cosmia unicolor

19.07.2017 11:24, Peter Khramov:

19.07.2017 0:51, Vladimir Bobow:

18.07.2017 22:42, Igal Oz:

18.07.2017 22:38, Igal Oz: This species is identified correctly.

18.07.2017 22:37, Igal Oz: This species is identified correctly.

18.07.2017 21:49, Peter Khramov:

The code is updated.

18.07.2017 21:48, Peter Khramov:

There were some troubles with maps markers download speed, now they are solved. The image pages maps will work considerably faster thanks to Ihor Kyryliuk.

18.07.2017 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Nikolai Vladimirov.

18.07.2017 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Imago Panorpa / Female.

18.07.2017 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Geometridae.

18.07.2017 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

18.07.2017 13:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

18.07.2017 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Irek Yusupov Hymenoptera / Fedor Ovechkin.

18.07.2017 0:44, Fedor Ovechkin:

Hymenoptera

17.07.2017 21:31, Vladimir Deryabin:

17.07.2017 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.07.2017 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Abraxas sylvata Abraxas fulvobasalis.

16.07.2017 19:36, Irina Nikulina:

16.07.2017 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

16.07.2017 9:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

16.07.2017 8:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Abraxas sylvata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.07.2017 8:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Paolo Mazzei Irina Nikulina.

16.07.2017 8:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Abraxas / Paolo Mazzei.

16.07.2017 8:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Abraxas / Irina Nikulina.

16.07.2017 8:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

16.07.2017 8:10, Vladimir Deryabin:

15.07.2017 23:15, Irina Nikulina:

15.07.2017 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apamea anceps / Vitaly Gumenuk Apamea crenata / Basil Sergienko.

15.07.2017 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neodiphthera / Imago Neodiphthera arfakiana / Male.

15.07.2017 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neodiphthera Neodiphthera arfakiana.

15.07.2017 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Syntherata / Imago Syntherata innescens / Male.

15.07.2017 20:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Syntherata Syntherata innescens.

15.07.2017 20:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2017 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.07.2017 20:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Coleophoridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2017 20:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Coleophoridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2017 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis ino / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2017 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis ino / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2017 19:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anania funebris / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2017 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

15.07.2017 19:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.07.2017 19:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.07.2017 18:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Proserpinus proserpina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.07.2017 18:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elena Nikulina Irina Nikulina.

15.07.2017 18:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Proserpinus proserpina / Confidently identified / Elena Nikulina.

15.07.2017 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Proserpinus proserpina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.07.2017 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Proserpinus proserpina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.07.2017 17:29, Irina Nikulina:

Proserpinus proserpina

15.07.2017 16:54, Artem Strizhov:

15.07.2017 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Roman Ishin.

15.07.2017 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Roman Ishin.

15.07.2017 10:29, Irina Nikulina:

Aphantopus hyperantus

15.07.2017 8:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.07.2017 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Olethreutes subretractus / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2017 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Olethreutes subretractus.

14.07.2017 22:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2017 22:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hydrelia flammeolaria / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2017 22:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orgyia recens / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2017 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pyrgus maculatus / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2017 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrgus malvae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2017 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Oroplema plagifera / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2017 22:14, Irina Nikulina:

Oroplema plagifera

14.07.2017 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

14.07.2017 22:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Carterocephalus silvicola / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2017 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ptycholoma lecheana / Viktoria Dubinina.

14.07.2017 21:58, Irina Nikulina:

14.07.2017 19:10, Olga Voronova: This species is identified correctly.

14.07.2017 18:56, Olga Voronova: This species is identified correctly.

13.07.2017 19:11, Valentina Ezhova:

Vasily, thank you! Next time I'll try and change size of the photos before uploading them.

13.07.2017 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is Capnodis tenebrionis (click for more info).
PS. Just make picture 800 px width and it'll be all OK.

13.07.2017 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hydria undulata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.07.2017 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.07.2017 11:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.07.2017 11:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.07.2017 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.07.2017 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.07.2017 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.07.2017 11:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.07.2017 11:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.07.2017 11:44, Fedor Ovechkin:

13.07.2017 11:43, Fedor Ovechkin:

13.07.2017 11:43, Fedor Ovechkin:

13.07.2017 11:36, Fedor Ovechkin:

13.07.2017 11:31, Fedor Ovechkin:

13.07.2017 11:28, Fedor Ovechkin:

13.07.2017 10:27, Irina Nikulina:

Orgyia recens

13.07.2017 6:24, Vladimir Deryabin:

13.07.2017 2:54, Valentina Ezhova:

I'm sorry, the photos are too big but I can't change it :(

13.07.2017 2:52, Valentina Ezhova:

Please, help with identification! 25 Jun 2017, The Volga river, around Cheboksary city (Russia).


12.07.2017 22:02, Irina Nikulina:

Pyrgus malvae

12.07.2017 21:44, Irina Nikulina:

Hydria undulata

12.07.2017 21:43, Vladimir Deryabin:

12.07.2017 19:11, Artem Strizhov:

12.07.2017 15:56, Peter Khramov:

12.07.2017 10:55, Irina Nikulina:

Pyrgus maculatus

12.07.2017 10:45, Irina Nikulina:

Hydrelia flammeolaria

12.07.2017 2:29, Galgo Dela:

El nombre común es "Saltarín alas largas" (Panoquina ocola) Fam Hesperiidae

12.07.2017 2:20, Galgo Dela:

Looks like Pyrgus oileus orcus
https://www.google.com.ar/search?q=pyrgus+oileus+orcus&client=firefox-b&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiMtu_IroLVAhVIF5AKHebICRYQsAQIKw&biw=1366&bih=651

11.07.2017 17:35, Alex Dumchus:

11.07.2017 13:46, Viktoria Dubinina:

11.07.2017 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.07.2017 11:05, Alex Dumchus:

11.07.2017 11:04, Alex Dumchus:

11.07.2017 11:03, Alex Dumchus:

11.07.2017 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Abraxas sylvata?

11.07.2017 8:17, Viktoria Dubinina:

11.07.2017 7:01, Viktoria Dubinina:

Olethreutes subretractus (Kawabe, 1976).

11.07.2017 6:58, Viktoria Dubinina:

10.07.2017 16:35, Irina Nikulina:

09.07.2017 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #66086 group.

09.07.2017 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2017 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #66085 group.

09.07.2017 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2017 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #66080 group.

09.07.2017 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2017 14:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2017 14:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2017 14:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2017 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2017 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2017 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

09.07.2017 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #60087 group.

09.07.2017 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

09.07.2017 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

09.07.2017 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

09.07.2017 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

09.07.2017 13:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliothela wulfeniana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.07.2017 5:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks! It's better than nothing :)

08.07.2017 17:41, Peter Khramov:

I'm sorry for the delay but it depends on me and other code people. I'll revert it for the time being.

08.07.2017 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, speed up please. There are many photos to link.

07.07.2017 17:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

07.07.2017 15:04, Elena Stadnik:

07.07.2017 13:04, Alex Dumchus:

Brahmaea celebica Toxopeus, 1939

07.07.2017 12:54, Alex Dumchus:

Syntherata innescens Naumann & Brechlin 2001

07.07.2017 12:50, Alex Dumchus:

Neodiphthera arfakiana ( Brechlin 2011 )

07.07.2017 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Pieris napi / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.07.2017 21:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

06.07.2017 16:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06.07.2017 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus rugosus.

06.07.2017 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerura vinula.

06.07.2017 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Furcula furcula.

06.07.2017 8:35, Viktoria Dubinina:

05.07.2017 22:45, Irina Nikulina:

I can't be sure either) Maybe I'll be at the other place in October.

05.07.2017 22:16, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny Komarov, Irina Nikulina, you?

05.07.2017 7:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Autographa gamma / Evgeny Komarov.

04.07.2017 21:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eucarta arctides / Evgeny Komarov.

04.07.2017 21:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eucarta arctides ?

04.07.2017 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.07.2017 13:42, Elena Stadnik:

03.07.2017 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Curculionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.07.2017 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Lepturinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.07.2017 13:44, Evgeny Komarov:

30.06.2017 20:23, Irina Nikulina:

30.06.2017 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eucosma / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.06.2017 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Lycaenidae.

30.06.2017 11:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hypena tristalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.06.2017 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Geometridae.

30.06.2017 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Siona lineata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.06.2017 14:33, Shamil Murtazin:

29.06.2017 13:42, Artem Strizhov:

29.06.2017 7:52, Shamil Murtazin:

29.06.2017 5:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Siona lineata ?

29.06.2017 5:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

29.06.2017 5:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

29.06.2017 5:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes Oryctes nasicornis.

29.06.2017 5:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes Oryctes nasicornis.

29.06.2017 5:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes Oryctes nasicornis.

29.06.2017 5:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes Oryctes nasicornis.

29.06.2017 5:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes Oryctes nasicornis.

29.06.2017 0:41, Irek Yusupov:

29.06.2017 0:26, Irek Yusupov:

29.06.2017 0:16, Irek Yusupov:

Euproctis?

28.06.2017 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.06.2017 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.06.2017 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 23:22, Irek Yusupov:

Oryctes nasicornis?

28.06.2017 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coreidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coreidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phasmida / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Larva Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Larva Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Larva Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Larva Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Larva Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Larva / 2017-06-11 18:29:00 Staphylinus caesareus / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov / 2017-06-11 18:38:00.

28.06.2017 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomelidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.06.2017 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2017 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

26.06.2017 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

25.06.2017 17:20, Peter Khramov:

The maps markers will be temporary invisible, we are changing maps code. I'll write as soon as it'll be ready to use.

25.06.2017 14:06, Vera Volkotrub:

Or Curculio dentipes?

23.06.2017 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

22.06.2017 22:04, Shamil Murtazin:

22.06.2017 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Victor Titov.

22.06.2017 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Victor Titov.

22.06.2017 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Victor Titov.

21.06.2017 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

21.06.2017 18:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

21.06.2017 18:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

21.06.2017 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #63347 group.

21.06.2017 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #63346 group.

21.06.2017 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.06.2017 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.06.2017 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.06.2017 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.06.2017 14:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Juri Palamarchuk Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

20.06.2017 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Olethreutinae / Irina Nikulina.

20.06.2017 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Olethreutinae / Irina Nikulina.

20.06.2017 11:21, Irina Nikulina:

Olethreutinae

20.06.2017 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Alexandr Zhakov.

20.06.2017 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Vladimir Bobow.

20.06.2017 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ptycholoma lecheana / Irina Nikulina.

20.06.2017 11:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ptycholoma lecheana / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.06.2017 11:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hyphoraia aulica / Irina Nikulina.

20.06.2017 11:06, Irina Nikulina:

Hyphoraia aulica

20.06.2017 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Thyris fenestrella / Irina Nikulina.

20.06.2017 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub Thyris fenestrella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.06.2017 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

20.06.2017 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thyris fenestrella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.06.2017 11:00, Irina Nikulina:

Thyris fenestrella ssp. ussuriensis Zaguljaev, 1985

20.06.2017 10:58, Irina Nikulina:

Thyris fenestrella ssp. ussuriensis Zaguljaev, 1985

20.06.2017 0:04, Shamil Murtazin:

I'd like it very much, but I can't be sure of definite yes or no right now =)

19.06.2017 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, how about you?

19.06.2017 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'll be there one hundred percent. It's my nineth (since 2010!)

19.06.2017 16:16, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, let's plan it for that time. Non-residents, could you do it?

18.06.2017 14:10, Shamil Murtazin:

The exhibition dates: 21-22 of October 2017 (https://vk.com/entoterra?w=wall5635122_283%2Fall)

18.06.2017 14:01, Peter Khramov:

There is some DDOS activity today, so don't be surprised if some problems with the site working will occur in the course of the day.

18.06.2017 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Hey, guys! It's June already. Let's begin to plan it through. Who is in favor and who is against.

18.06.2017 6:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

ok

18.06.2017 0:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

underside

17.06.2017 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I fixed it for all three photos.

17.06.2017 21:41, Fedor Ovechkin:

top

17.06.2017 21:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

upperside

17.06.2017 21:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

topside.

17.06.2017 20:56, Peter Khramov:

17.06.2017 20:53, Peter Khramov:

This is the Zagreb Museum, they might have a somewhat less responsible attitude for the identification and confirmation...

17.06.2017 14:19, Alex Dumchus:

The label is ancient...at least, Stalin's times. And there were no identification guides. It is necessary to review the rest of the photos with Attacus identification). All my Atlases have an upper small transparent eye, but doherty does not always have one, lorquinii does not have one (I'm talking about the most common species)

17.06.2017 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Attacus atlas / Peter Khramov Archaeoattacus edwardsii / Igor Ivannikov.

17.06.2017 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I completely agree with the identification: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Archaeoattacus%20edwardsii.htm Unfortunately, there are also some incorrect identifications in museums ((( I'm moving it.

17.06.2017 9:33, Alex Dumchus:

I agree with Igor. Please, move the photo to edwardsii

17.06.2017 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.06.2017 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.06.2017 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.06.2017 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2017 20:32, Igor Ivannikov:

Very similar to Archaeoattacus edwardsii.

15.06.2017 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I was at this location on 10.06.2017. There were so many Mnemosynes flying that no other white butterflies were visible at all :)
I easily collected 22 specimens in 15 minutes and stopped (though it was possible to catch all you want)....
It turned out to be a great location (and this despite low season in the region).
I'll post a couple or two later as compensation for this torn specimen:)

15.06.2017 10:29, Peter Khramov:

OK, it's fixed.

15.06.2017 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elateridae Hypoganomorphus laevicollis.

15.06.2017 8:48, Vera Volkotrub:

13.06.2017 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

13.06.2017 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Done. I really can’t assign it to a subspecies. It's not in the database.
You can write the subtype yourself in the top line.

13.06.2017 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Confidently identified Chrysolina graminis / Tentatively identified.

13.06.2017 10:37, Vera Volkotrub:

>>>>

13.06.2017 8:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Coranus subapterus (De Geer, 1773), inaccurate, photo definition - Vladislav Kozminykh

13.06.2017 8:45, Shamil Murtazin:

Coranus subapterus (De Geer, 1773), inaccurate, photo definition - Vladislav Kozminykh

13.06.2017 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Vlad Proklov.

13.06.2017 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Vlad Proklov.

12.06.2017 23:27, Shamil Murtazin:

Serviformica rufibarbis

12.06.2017 9:53, Shamil Murtazin:

11.06.2017 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Agonum sexpunctatum / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.06.2017 11:00, Evgeny Komarov:

09.06.2017 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lilioceris Lilioceris rugata.

09.06.2017 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lilioceris Lilioceris rugata.

09.06.2017 15:54, Vera Volkotrub:

08.06.2017 19:17, Nataliya Bistrova:

08.06.2017 18:54, Nataliya Bistrova:

07.06.2017 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

07.06.2017 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sycanus collaris / Confidently identified / Ryan Brookes.

07.06.2017 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sycanus collaris / Confidently identified / Ryan Brookes.

07.06.2017 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anna Gerasimova Vlad Proklov.

07.06.2017 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Trichopterygini / Irina Nikulina.

07.06.2017 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Vladimir Bobow Acleris bergmanniana / Yuri Semejkin.

07.06.2017 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

06.06.2017 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06.06.2017 11:34, Peter Khramov:

05.06.2017 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.06.2017 14:58, Peter Khramov:

04.06.2017 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

04.06.2017 0:33, Peter Khramov:

03.06.2017 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

02.06.2017 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anna Gerasimova Vlad Proklov.

02.06.2017 13:08, Peter Khramov:

02.06.2017 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

31.05.2017 14:45, Irina Nikulina:

Trichopterygini

31.05.2017 14:19, Irina Nikulina:

31.05.2017 14:13, Irina Nikulina:

30.05.2017 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Tortricidae.

30.05.2017 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Pyralidae.

30.05.2017 9:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Pyralidae.

29.05.2017 7:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Pterostichus melanarius / Tentatively identified / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

29.05.2017 7:04, Evgeny Komarov:

29.05.2017 7:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Bembidion Bembidion dentellus.

26.05.2017 21:06, Vladimir Bryukhov:

24.05.2017 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adalia bipunctata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.05.2017 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomelidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.05.2017 11:17, Tetyana Monosiuk:

24.05.2017 7:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.05.2017 6:44, Evgeny Komarov:

24.05.2017 1:00, Peter Khramov:

23.05.2017 20:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Olga Voronova Rheumaptera hastata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.05.2017 17:24, Peter Khramov:

23.05.2017 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

23.05.2017 13:48, Tetyana Monosiuk:

23.05.2017 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexander Boldyrev.

23.05.2017 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexander Boldyrev.

23.05.2017 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Olga Voronova.

22.05.2017 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Opatrum sabulosum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.05.2017 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Opatrum sabulosum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.05.2017 17:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

22.05.2017 12:34, Peter Khramov:

22.05.2017 1:20, Rostislav Oleinik:

21.05.2017 12:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Andrena thoracica / Confidently identified / Juri Palamarchuk.

18.05.2017 22:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocoenorrhinus germanicus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

18.05.2017 22:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocoenorrhinus germanicus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

18.05.2017 22:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocoenorrhinus germanicus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

18.05.2017 22:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocoenorrhinus germanicus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

18.05.2017 22:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chlaenius nitidulus / Confidently identified / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

18.05.2017 22:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chlaenius nitidulus / Confidently identified / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

18.05.2017 22:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chlaenius nitidulus / Confidently identified / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

18.05.2017 22:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.05.2017 22:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chlaenius nitidulus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

18.05.2017 22:20, Evgeny Komarov:

17.05.2017 15:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

17.05.2017 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Vlad Proklov.

17.05.2017 15:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Alexandr Zhakov.

17.05.2017 15:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Alexandr Zhakov.

17.05.2017 5:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.05.2017 5:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.05.2017 8:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

15.05.2017 23:57, Rostislav Oleinik:

15.05.2017 16:52, Alex Dumchus:

I'll try and use some bergamot tea in the Mexico or the Dominican Republic. You know, I'll just spread it through a hotel's balcony :-)

15.05.2017 13:18, kirsanova Evgenia:

Is anyone tried to attract moths on flavours? For example, (E)-alpha-bergamotene for Manduca sexta.

15.05.2017 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.05.2017 14:13, Peter Khramov:

13.05.2017 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

13.05.2017 19:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Oleg Pekarsky.

13.05.2017 19:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Oleg Pekarsky.

13.05.2017 13:55, Peter Khramov:

12.05.2017 17:06, Shamil Murtazin:

12.05.2017 8:24, Ryan Brookes:

Hey insecta.pro,

http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/72746
I misidentified this moth as Xanthodes intersepta Guenée, 1852 but it is really Pardoxia graellsi (Feisthamel, 1837).

I sent a mail to the admin informing him about the mistake but no action was taken. I've also added two comments on this photo http://insecta.pro/gallery/61385 but nobody seems to be listening. Now this is the fourth time I am reminding you fellas. Please correct it! :-)

Thanks,

Ryan

12.05.2017 8:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anisodactylus binotatus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

12.05.2017 8:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anisodactylus binotatus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

12.05.2017 8:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anisodactylus binotatus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

12.05.2017 8:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anisodactylus binotatus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

12.05.2017 8:00, Ryan Brookes:

Photo #64880
http://insecta.pro/gallery/64880

This species has been transferred to the genus Barsine Walker.
http://www.nic.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/lithosiinae/barsine/#gratiosa

Please update!

11.05.2017 16:48, Peter Khramov:

11.05.2017 16:46, Peter Khramov:

10.05.2017 11:23, Alex Dumchus:

Regarding the morphs: Patrick Blandin lists it as a separate species: Morpho (Morpho) granadensis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867

1. M. granadensis granadensis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867
2. M. granadensis polybaptus Butler, 1875
3. M. granadensis lycanor Fruhstorfer, 1907
http://www.patrickblandin.com/fr/zooms/15-checklist-du-genre-morpho-fabricius-1807

08.05.2017 18:50, Shamil Murtazin:

08.05.2017 16:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irek Yusupov Alexandr Zhakov.

08.05.2017 16:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irek Yusupov Alexandr Zhakov.

08.05.2017 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Aspitates acuminaria / Basil Sergienko.

08.05.2017 15:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Alcis bastelbergeri.

08.05.2017 15:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

08.05.2017 10:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae Polyommatus icarus.

08.05.2017 10:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae Polyommatus icarus.

08.05.2017 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Irek Yusupov Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.05.2017 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perigrapha circumducta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.05.2017 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

07.05.2017 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

06.05.2017 20:13, Evgeny Komarov:

06.05.2017 17:25, Shamil Murtazin:

04.05.2017 23:36, Shamil Murtazin:

03.05.2017 8:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

http://bsj-t.blogspot.com/2013/02/searching-for-romeo-in-panay-philippines.html?m=1

02.05.2017 21:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Microdera convexa Microdera deserta.

02.05.2017 13:02, Alex Dumchus:

Dysphania percota ?

01.05.2017 14:39, Peter Khramov:

30.04.2017 13:59, Peter Khramov:

Done.

29.04.2017 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, this photo is still in the additional gallery despite the fact that it was moved from Papilio machaon back in July last year. It illustrates the species, but it is not displayed on the right of the page and attributes to "Additional gallery" :
Finally attribute this photo to the Main Gallery. There are simply no other photos of Trogus lapidator on the website.

26.04.2017 19:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus fuscicornis Harpalus fuscipalpis.

26.04.2017 19:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus fuscicornis Harpalus fuscipalpis.

26.04.2017 19:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus fuscicornis Harpalus fuscipalpis.

26.04.2017 19:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Maikl Lychak Coniocleonus nigrosuturatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.04.2017 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Coniocleonus nigrosuturatus?

26.04.2017 7:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Irek Yusupov Elasmucha grisea / Boris Loboda.

25.04.2017 23:56, Irek Yusupov:

25.04.2017 22:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Juri Palamarchuk Evgeny Komarov.

25.04.2017 22:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Juri Palamarchuk Evgeny Komarov.

25.04.2017 20:57, Evgeny Komarov:

25.04.2017 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

25.04.2017 12:22, Boris Loboda:

Находился в бурой гнили дуба. Еще попадались Aesalus scarabaeoides, Peltis ferruginea, Pentaphyllus testaceus.

25.04.2017 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

25.04.2017 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

25.04.2017 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

24.04.2017 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vespidae / Irek Yusupov Vespa crabro / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vespidae / Irek Yusupov Vespa crabro / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vespidae / Irek Yusupov Vespa crabro / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vespidae / Irek Yusupov Vespa crabro / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Lycaena phlaeas / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irek Yusupov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Lycaena phlaeas.

24.04.2017 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trichius / Irek Yusupov Trichius fasciatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.04.2017 13:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Deilephila elpenor / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.04.2017 13:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Deilephila elpenor / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.04.2017 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Deilephila elpenor / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.04.2017 12:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Not identified.

24.04.2017 12:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Glaucopsyche alexis / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.04.2017 12:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.04.2017 11:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Terinos / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

24.04.2017 11:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.04.2017 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.04.2017 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.04.2017 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.04.2017 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.04.2017 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.04.2017 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Siobla ruficornis / Tentatively identified.

24.04.2017 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Siobla ruficornis / Tentatively identified.

24.04.2017 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified Siobla ruficornis / Tentatively identified.

24.04.2017 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.04.2017 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.04.2017 10:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.04.2017 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.04.2017 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blattodea / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov.

24.04.2017 10:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.04.2017 10:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blattodea / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov.

24.04.2017 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blattodea / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov.

24.04.2017 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.04.2017 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Not identified.

24.04.2017 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturniidae / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

24.04.2017 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Not identified.

24.04.2017 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Not identified.

24.04.2017 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stichophthalma / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

24.04.2017 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / SK Duttamajumder.

24.04.2017 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bactrocera / Confidently identified / SK Duttamajumder.

24.04.2017 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bactrocera / Confidently identified / SK Duttamajumder.

24.04.2017 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Bactrocera.

24.04.2017 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bactrocera / Confidently identified / SK Duttamajumder.

24.04.2017 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / SK Duttamajumder.

24.04.2017 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterophoridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siona lineata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rutelinae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limodromus assimilis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.04.2017 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2017 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.04.2017 20:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.04.2017 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

23.04.2017 14:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris napi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.04.2017 14:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.04.2017 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.04.2017 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago / 2016-07-29 00:53:00 Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov / 0000-00-00 00:00:00.

23.04.2017 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.04.2017 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.04.2017 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Not identified.

23.04.2017 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Not identified.

23.04.2017 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Not identified.

23.04.2017 11:27, Boris Loboda: This species is identified correctly.

23.04.2017 11:26, Boris Loboda: This species is identified correctly.

23.04.2017 11:26, Boris Loboda: This species is identified correctly.

23.04.2017 8:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov.

23.04.2017 8:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov.

23.04.2017 8:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov.

23.04.2017 8:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.04.2017 7:06, Evgeny Komarov:

22.04.2017 10:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Entephria flavicinctata Entephria cyanata.

22.04.2017 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

22.04.2017 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Entephria flavicinctata Entephria cyanata.

22.04.2017 8:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Irek Yusupov Amara aenea / Evgeny Komarov.

22.04.2017 8:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Irek Yusupov Amara aenea / Evgeny Komarov.

22.04.2017 8:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Irek Yusupov Amara aenea / Evgeny Komarov.

22.04.2017 8:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Irek Yusupov Amara aenea / Evgeny Komarov.

22.04.2017 8:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dermestidae Attagenus smirnovi.

22.04.2017 8:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dermestidae Attagenus smirnovi.

22.04.2017 8:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthrenus Attagenus smirnovi.

22.04.2017 8:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthrenus Dermestidae.

22.04.2017 8:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthrenus Dermestidae.

22.04.2017 7:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Anthrenus / Evgeny Komarov.

22.04.2017 7:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Anthrenus / Evgeny Komarov.

22.04.2017 7:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Anthrenus / Evgeny Komarov.

21.04.2017 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Imago / Irek Yusupov Cicindela sylvatica / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.04.2017 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Imago / Irek Yusupov Cicindela sylvatica / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.04.2017 8:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Imago / Irek Yusupov Cicindela sylvatica / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.04.2017 0:46, Boris Loboda:

Полнокрылая форма. Среди них попадаются.

20.04.2017 1:59, Irek Yusupov:

Aeshna caerulea?

19.04.2017 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Irek Yusupov Oryctes nasicornis / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.04.2017 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Irek Yusupov Oryctes nasicornis / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.04.2017 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Irek Yusupov Oryctes nasicornis / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.04.2017 12:53, Boris Loboda:

Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann, 1910

19.04.2017 12:51, Boris Loboda:

Elasmucha grisea

18.04.2017 17:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hydraecia micacea / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 17:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Falcaria lacertinaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 17:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Scopula immorata / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Scopula immorata / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Irek Yusupov Timandra comae / Tentatively identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis ino / Tentatively identified / Vitalij Dobronosov.

18.04.2017 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Lagria hirta / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.04.2017 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Triodia sylvina / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Triodia sylvina / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 12:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Calamia tridens / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Calamia tridens / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Calamia tridens / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.04.2017 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Celypha striana / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.04.2017 22:56, Irek Yusupov:

Psyllobora?

17.04.2017 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.04.2017 10:25, Boris Loboda:

> Сейчас нет.
Надо делать. Сейчас, когда крутишься на десятках сайтов, нереально прочесывать их каждые пол-часа в ожидании ответов. Для популярности сайта важен не только основной функционал, но и сервис... Человек должен чувствовать себя комфортно, решать свои задачи при минимальных затратах.

16.04.2017 10:20, Irek Yusupov:

16.04.2017 10:17, Irek Yusupov:

Sphaerophoria ?

16.04.2017 1:54, Shamil Murtazin:

16.04.2017 1:54, Boris Loboda:

> Борис, примерно такая мысль и была. И с макроида собиралась инфа, и с алсфотопейджа))
Мысль нормальная на мой взгляд. Ну а критика народа насчет достоверности... так а где достоверность эту взять, если это просто фотки. Достоверность в музее и в гениталиях. И то вот - новые виды описывают / исследуют и переопределяют даже в музеях. Новая революция с Graphosoma как раз подвалила... :)
Ну а тут такой же контингент, примерно как и на макроиде. Разве что на molbiol уровень повыше, но там систематику не хотят вводить, я как-то предлагал - отказались. Хотя наверное база фоток самая грандиозная, да и уровень определения явно повыше, дальше уже по-моему некуда.

15.04.2017 17:15, Peter Khramov:

15.04.2017 13:49, Peter Khramov:

15.04.2017 1:37, Konstantin Lyutov:

15.04.2017 1:31, Konstantin Lyutov: This species is identified correctly.

14.04.2017 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

13.04.2017 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.04.2017 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.04.2017 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

13.04.2017 15:11, Vitalij Dobronosov:

13.04.2017 8:49, Boris Loboda:

10.04.2017 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stephanocrates dohertyi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stephanocrates dohertyi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stephanocrates dohertyi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stephanocrates dohertyi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stephanocrates dohertyi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stephanocrates dohertyi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus doesburgi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus doesburgi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus doesburgi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

10.04.2017 3:29, Yuri Rogozin:

Prosopocoilus doesburgi makkiensis (Schenk 1999)

10.04.2017 3:27, Yuri Rogozin: This species is identified correctly.

10.04.2017 3:27, Yuri Rogozin:

Stephanocrates dohertyi (Jordan, 1901)

10.04.2017 3:26, Yuri Rogozin: This species is identified correctly.

10.04.2017 3:26, Yuri Rogozin:

Stephanocrates dohertyi (Jordan, 1901)

10.04.2017 3:20, Yuri Rogozin: This species is identified correctly.

10.04.2017 3:20, Yuri Rogozin:

Prosopocoilus doesburgi

09.04.2017 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epirrhoe tristata / Irina Nikulina Rheumaptera subhastata / Basil Sergienko.

08.04.2017 20:40, Shamil Murtazin:

08.04.2017 9:53, Boris Loboda:

08.04.2017 6:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.04.2017 1:09, Boris Loboda: This species is identified correctly.

08.04.2017 0:41, Boris Loboda:

07.04.2017 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Geocoris erythrocephalus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ivan Pristrem Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae Geocoris erythrocephalus.

07.04.2017 18:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Irek Yusupov Eurydema oleracea / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Berytidae / Ivan Pristrem Chorosoma / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Irek Yusupov Coreus marginatus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Aphanus rolandri / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coreidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Ceraleptus lividus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cydnidae / Ivan Pristrem Ochetostethus opacus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Reduviidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Rhynocoris annulatus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Drymus brunneus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Drymus brunneus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Drymus brunneus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Raglius alboacuminatus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Rhyparochromus vulgaris / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Chilacis typhae / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Megalonotus praetextatus / Tentatively identified / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Ischnodemus sabuleti / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Emblethis / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Metopoplax origani / Tentatively identified / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Dimorphopterus spinolae / Tentatively identified / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Gonianotus marginepunctatus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Rhyparochromus vulgaris / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Rhyparochromus vulgaris / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Rhyparochromus vulgaris / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Rhyparochromus vulgaris / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Rhyparochromus vulgaris / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Emblethis / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Emblethis / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Ivan Pristrem Sphragisticus nebulosus / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygaeidae / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Scolopostethus / Tentatively identified / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Irek Yusupov Elasmucha grisea / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Irek Yusupov Elasmucha grisea / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Irina Nikulina Arma custos / Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nikolai Vladimirov Boris Loboda.

07.04.2017 18:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tingidae Physatocheila.

07.04.2017 15:09, Boris Loboda:

Arma custos (Fabricius, 1794)

07.04.2017 11:52, Boris Loboda:

Elasmucha grisea (Linnaeus, 1758)

07.04.2017 11:50, Boris Loboda:

Elasmucha grisea (Linnaeus, 1758)

07.04.2017 11:43, Boris Loboda:

(?) Scolopostethus

07.04.2017 11:42, Boris Loboda:

Rh. vulgaris

07.04.2017 11:41, Boris Loboda:

Sphragisticus nebulosus (Fallen, 1807)

07.04.2017 11:40, Boris Loboda:

Emblethis

07.04.2017 11:40, Boris Loboda:

Emblethis

07.04.2017 11:39, Boris Loboda:

Rh. vulgaris

07.04.2017 11:38, Boris Loboda:

Rh. vulgaris

07.04.2017 11:37, Boris Loboda:

Rh. vulgaris

07.04.2017 11:37, Boris Loboda:

Gonianotus marginepunctatus (Wolff, 1804)

07.04.2017 11:35, Boris Loboda:

(?) Dimorphopterus spinolae

07.04.2017 11:32, Boris Loboda:

(?) Metopoplax origani

07.04.2017 11:26, Boris Loboda:

Emblethis

07.04.2017 11:25, Boris Loboda:

Ischnodemus sabuleti (Fallen, 1826)

07.04.2017 11:21, Boris Loboda:

(?) Megalonotus praetextatus

07.04.2017 11:18, Boris Loboda:

Rhyparochromus vulgaris

07.04.2017 11:15, Boris Loboda:

Chilacis typhae (Perris, 1857)

07.04.2017 11:14, Boris Loboda:

Raglius alboacuminatus (Goeze, 1778)

07.04.2017 11:12, Boris Loboda:

Drymus brunneus (R.F. Sahlberg, 1848)

07.04.2017 11:11, Boris Loboda:

Drymus brunneus (R.F. Sahlberg, 1848)

07.04.2017 11:09, Boris Loboda:

Drymus brunneus (R.F. Sahlberg, 1848)

07.04.2017 11:05, Boris Loboda:

07.04.2017 11:03, Boris Loboda:

Ochetostethus opacus (Scholtz, 1847)

07.04.2017 11:00, Boris Loboda:

07.04.2017 10:53, Boris Loboda:

Aphanus rolandri (Linnaeus, 1758)

07.04.2017 10:06, Boris Loboda:

Coreus marginatus

07.04.2017 10:03, Boris Loboda:

Chorosoma (Rhopalidae)

07.04.2017 9:59, Boris Loboda:

Eurydema (Eurydema) oleracea (Linnaeus, 1758) :446

07.04.2017 9:55, Boris Loboda:

Geocoris erythrocephalus (Lepeletier & Serville, 1825)

07.04.2017 9:55, Boris Loboda:

Geocoris erythrocephalus (Lepeletier & Serville, 1825)

07.04.2017 9:48, Boris Loboda:

Physatocheila

06.04.2017 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06.04.2017 6:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

04.04.2017 21:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neocerura kandyia wisei Kamalia kandyia.

04.04.2017 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neocerura kandyia wisei Kamalia kandyia.

04.04.2017 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neocerura kandyia wisei Kamalia kandyia.

04.04.2017 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neocerura kandyia wisei Kamalia kandyia.

02.04.2017 10:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.04.2017 10:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cryptocephalus sericeus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2017 23:16, Ryan Brookes:

The correct name as given in my comment above is Kamalia kandyia wisei (Swinhoe, 1891).

01.04.2017 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Peter :)

01.04.2017 22:51, Ryan Brookes:

http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/704945

Please note that the species kandyia Moore and subspecies wisei Swinhoe is now placed in the genus Kamalia Koçak & Kemal, not Neocerura Matsumura.
https://archive.org/stream/CentreForEntomologicalStudiesAnkaraMiscellaneousPapers104/MP104#page/n2/mode/1up

Also see Schintlmeister, 2013. World Catalogue of Insects, Volume 11: Notodontidae and Oenosandridae (Lepidoptera): 229.

For the most part the classification of the Noctuoidea followed by http://www.sp2000.org/ (and subsequently insecta.pro) is outdated.

01.04.2017 21:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocerura kandyia wisei / Confidently identified / Ryan Brookes.

01.04.2017 21:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocerura kandyia wisei / Confidently identified / Ryan Brookes.

01.04.2017 21:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocerura kandyia wisei / Confidently identified / Ryan Brookes.

01.04.2017 21:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocerura kandyia wisei / Confidently identified / Ryan Brookes.

01.04.2017 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Wish you stone calmness and financial prosperity!

01.04.2017 9:49, Ryan Brookes:

Family Gracillariidae

31.03.2017 11:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Procridinae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.03.2017 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Canephora hirsuta / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.03.2017 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

30.03.2017 16:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macaria liturata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.03.2017 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thetidia smaragdaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.03.2017 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Elophila orientalis / Irina Nikulina.

30.03.2017 12:14, Alexander Belousov:

30.03.2017 10:59, Irina Nikulina:

Elophila orientalis

30.03.2017 0:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Orgyia antiqua / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.03.2017 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Macaria shanghaisaria / Irina Nikulina.

28.03.2017 13:10, Alexsandr Golubev:

Tachina grossa???

28.03.2017 12:18, Irina Nikulina:

Macaria shanghaisaria

28.03.2017 7:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.03.2017 7:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Pterophoridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.03.2017 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Diptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.03.2017 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.03.2017 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena virgaureae / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.03.2017 20:49, Alex Dumchus:

27.03.2017 19:01, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Либо продавец, либо - владелец коллекции

27.03.2017 12:44, Alex Dumchus:

26.03.2017 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Chrysops relictus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.03.2017 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Polygonia c-album / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.03.2017 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Nymphalis antiopa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.03.2017 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Deilephila elpenor / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.03.2017 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Chalcophora mariana / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.03.2017 11:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Limnobaris t-album Limnobaris dolorosa.

26.03.2017 11:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Limnobaris t-album Limnobaris dolorosa.

26.03.2017 11:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Limnobaris t-album Limnobaris dolorosa.

26.03.2017 10:50, Ryan Brookes:

Holy crap!
Diagnosis: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apophenia

26.03.2017 8:47, Ryan Brookes:

Once again I would like to remind the admin/moderators that this is Pardoxia graellsi (Feisthamel, 1837), not Xanthodes intersepta Guenée, 1852 as I had mistaken it to be. Please make the correction. Thank you.

Ryan

25.03.2017 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ourapteryx sambucaria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.03.2017 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiommata maera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heodes vigaureae Lycaena virgaureae.

24.03.2017 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Heodes vigaureae / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas sylvata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela campestris / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.03.2017 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

444 555 Alexandr Zhakov.

24.03.2017 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutella xylostella / Confidently identified / 444 555.

24.03.2017 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aedes albopictus / Confidently identified / Spenser Galloway.

24.03.2017 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cetonia aurata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cetonia aurata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cetonia aurata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cetonia aurata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autocrates vitalisi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

24.03.2017 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autocrates vitalisi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

24.03.2017 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autocrates vitalisi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

24.03.2017 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus perarmatus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

24.03.2017 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus perarmatus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

24.03.2017 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus perarmatus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

24.03.2017 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2017 0:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aromia moschata / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aromia moschata / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aromia moschata / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomela populi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomela populi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Amphimallon solstitiale / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Amphimallon solstitiale / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Jodis putata / Confidently identified / Male & female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eulithis pyropata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thyatira batis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

23.03.2017 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxythyrea funesta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dolichosoma lineare / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brachyta interrogationis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapanthia villosoviridescens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2017 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I'm all about Meschera, as always :) I expect many interesting findings there, maybe Tragosoma depsarium even :)

23.03.2017 20:12, Evgeny Komarov:

I'll begin :)
July 2017 — I'll try Pamir, around Fedchenko ice-flow. I hope I'll make it and then I could upload some interesting photos to the website!

23.03.2017 20:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Let's share our plans for the trips, travels and about-entomological adventures for the years to come. It's interesting who is going where and what we can expect from them!

23.03.2017 19:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.03.2017 19:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.03.2017 19:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Ptinus fur / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

23.03.2017 19:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Ptinus fur / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

23.03.2017 19:44, Evgeny Komarov:

23.03.2017 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.03.2017 10:47, Peter Khramov:

23.03.2017 10:19, Alexander Belousov:

23.03.2017 8:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.03.2017 8:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub Cupido minimus / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.03.2017 8:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.03.2017 8:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Carterocephalus silvicola / Yuri Semejkin.

22.03.2017 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #55256 group.

22.03.2017 0:48, Irina Nikulina:

22.03.2017 0:43, Irina Nikulina:

22.03.2017 0:38, Irina Nikulina:

Cupido minimus I suppose. A dark spot at the edge of the hindwings is visible, though somewhat erased.

21.03.2017 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pleuroptya ruralis / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2017 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Circobotys heterogenalis / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2017 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Evgeny Komarov Ochlodes ochracea / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2017 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Evgeny Komarov Thymelicus sylvatica / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2017 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

21.03.2017 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Vladimir Bobow Carterocephalus palaemon / Yuri Semejkin.

21.03.2017 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Vladimir Bobow Heteropterus morpheus / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2017 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

21.03.2017 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena virgaureae / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2017 12:32, Irina Nikulina:

Pleuroptya ruralis

21.03.2017 12:25, Irina Nikulina:

21.03.2017 12:07, Irina Nikulina:

21.03.2017 11:55, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes ochracea

21.03.2017 11:51, Irina Nikulina:

Thymelicus sylvatica

21.03.2017 11:49, Irina Nikulina:

21.03.2017 11:45, Irina Nikulina:

Heteropterus morpheus

21.03.2017 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Hesperiidae.

20.03.2017 23:38, Andrey Polstyanoy:

В роде http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1714 нету таксона Charaxes marki Lane & Müller, 2006, фото которого имеется.

http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=069318783496235;res=IELHSS;type=pdf

Примечательно, что самку описали аж только в 2015.

20.03.2017 23:32, Andrey Polstyanoy:

20.03.2017 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #24012 group.

20.03.2017 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.03.2017 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.03.2017 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #24014 group.

20.03.2017 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.03.2017 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.03.2017 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tenthredinidae / Artem Strizhov.

20.03.2017 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

20.03.2017 19:55, Artem Strizhov:

20.03.2017 14:13, Irek Yusupov:

20.03.2017 12:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

20.03.2017 12:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

20.03.2017 12:31, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Добавил


Спасибо

20.03.2017 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

20.03.2017 10:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus moraei Cryptocephalus quadriguttatus.

20.03.2017 10:04, Vladimir Bryukhov:

20.03.2017 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

20.03.2017 8:43, Andrey Polstyanoy:

19.03.2017 16:52, Peter Khramov:

19.03.2017 14:39, Shamil Murtazin:

19.03.2017 10:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

19.03.2017 10:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

19.03.2017 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexsandr Golubev Alexandr Zhakov.

19.03.2017 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Plebejus argus / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thymelicus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypena rostralis.

18.03.2017 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia suasa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha pamphilus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.03.2017 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha glycerion / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

17.03.2017 22:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Angerona prunaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Sergeyy Tjabut.

17.03.2017 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 22:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arctia caja / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 21:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atolmis rubricollis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 21:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Camptogramma bilineata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pararge aegeria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cupido argiades.

17.03.2017 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cossus cossus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cossus cossus.

17.03.2017 21:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)

17.03.2017 20:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.03.2017 20:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.03.2017 20:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.03.2017 20:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.03.2017 20:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.03.2017 20:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabus nemoralis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

17.03.2017 20:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabus nemoralis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

17.03.2017 20:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabus nemoralis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

17.03.2017 20:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabus nemoralis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

17.03.2017 20:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabus nemoralis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

17.03.2017 20:41, Evgeny Komarov:

17.03.2017 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucoma salicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucoma salicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucoma salicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.03.2017 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus optilete / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 18:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 18:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deilephila elpenor / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 18:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deilephila elpenor / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterophoridae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterophoridae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hecatera dysodea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diachrysia stenochrysis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysoteuchia culmella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Alexsandr Golubev Xylena vetusta / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Alexsandr Golubev Xylena vetusta / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Diaphora mendica / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Araschnia levana / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Euclidia glyphica / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lomographa temerata / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Euclidia glyphica / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Diacrisia sannio / Alexsandr Golubev.

17.03.2017 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polypogon tentacularia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Spilosoma lutea.

17.03.2017 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Maniola jurtina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siona lineata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa cardui / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis camilla / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odezia atrata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna conigera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyralis farinalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drepana falcataria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dypterygia scabriuscula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 12:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aporia crataegi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

17.03.2017 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hepialus humuli / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hepialus humuli / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 11:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea / Alexsandr Golubev Araschnia levana / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 11:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tetheella fluctuosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aphomia sociella / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

17.03.2017 10:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anaplectoides prasina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calyptra thalictri / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Colias / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Rivula sericealis / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Leptidea / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lomographa temerata / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Timandra griseata / Alexsandr Golubev Timandra comae / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Callophrys rubi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.03.2017 10:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Imago / Alexsandr Golubev Cupido argiades / Tentatively identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2017 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

17.03.2017 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

17.03.2017 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lomaspilis marginata / Alexsandr Golubev Epirrhoe tristata / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Camptogramma bilineata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Scoliopteryx libatrix / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Pseudopanthera macularia / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sitochroa verticalis / Alexsandr Golubev Camptogramma bilineata / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Trachea atriplicis / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Maniola jurtina / Female / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Abraxas / Alexsandr Golubev Abraxas sylvata / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Aglais urticae / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Favonius taxila / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2017 0:26, Irina Nikulina:

Epirrhoe tristata

17.03.2017 0:11, Irina Nikulina:

Aphantopus hyperantus

17.03.2017 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

Camptogramma bilineata

16.03.2017 23:54, Irina Nikulina:

Scoliopteryx libatrix

16.03.2017 23:45, Irina Nikulina:

Pseudopanthera macularia

16.03.2017 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Camptogramma bilineata

16.03.2017 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

Trachea atriplicis

16.03.2017 23:25, Irina Nikulina:

16.03.2017 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Abraxas sylvata

16.03.2017 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Abraxas / Alexsandr Golubev Chiasmia clathrata / Irina Nikulina.

16.03.2017 23:03, Irina Nikulina:

Chiasmia clathrata

16.03.2017 22:58, Irina Nikulina:

Aglais urticae

16.03.2017 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote bankiana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.03.2017 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Deltote pygarga / Irina Nikulina.

16.03.2017 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ematurga atomaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.03.2017 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea / Alexsandr Golubev Araschnia levana / Irina Nikulina.

16.03.2017 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apatura iris / Alexsandr Golubev Limenitis camilla / Irina Nikulina.

16.03.2017 22:51, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis camilla

16.03.2017 22:41, Irina Nikulina:

Araschnia levana

16.03.2017 22:32, Irina Nikulina:

Deltote pygarga

16.03.2017 22:30, Irina Nikulina:

Deltote bankiana

16.03.2017 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Leptura quadrifasciata / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.03.2017 22:19, Irina Nikulina:

Ematurga atomaria

16.03.2017 22:03, Irina Nikulina:

16.03.2017 21:34, Andrey Polstyanoy:


Добавьте вид в базу - Evenus felix Neild & Bálint, 2014

http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/evenus_felix.htm

16.03.2017 19:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Siona lineata / Evgeny Komarov.

16.03.2017 19:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Aphantopus hyperantus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.03.2017 19:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Aphantopus hyperantus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.03.2017 18:10, Alexsandr Golubev: This species is identified correctly.

16.03.2017 12:08, Shamil Murtazin:

16.03.2017 11:36, Peter Khramov:

14.03.2017 16:52, Evgeny Komarov:

14.03.2017 16:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Hylobius abietis / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

14.03.2017 16:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Limodromus assimilis / Evgeny Komarov.

14.03.2017 16:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Limodromus assimilis / Evgeny Komarov.

14.03.2017 8:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Leiopus nebulosus Leiopus linnei.

14.03.2017 8:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Glaphyra kiesenwetteri Glaphyra umbellatarum.

14.03.2017 8:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Glaphyra kiesenwetteri Glaphyra umbellatarum.

13.03.2017 12:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Electrophaes corylata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.03.2017 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

13.03.2017 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

12.03.2017 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus perarmatus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

12.03.2017 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autocrates vitalisi / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

12.03.2017 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

12.03.2017 22:00, Shamil Murtazin:

12.03.2017 21:51, Yuri Rogozin: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2017 21:50, Yuri Rogozin:

Neolucanus perarmathus

12.03.2017 21:09, Yuri Rogozin:

Autocrates vitalisi

11.03.2017 22:22, Shamil Murtazin:

11.03.2017 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.03.2017 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.03.2017 9:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.03.2017 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.03.2017 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.03.2017 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.03.2017 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.03.2017 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.03.2017 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Electrophaes corylata ?

10.03.2017 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Cucullia artemisiae / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.03.2017 10:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Paracolax tristalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.03.2017 10:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Chrysoteuchia culmella / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.03.2017 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Agrotis exclamationis / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.03.2017 0:27, Andrey Polstyanoy:

http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/611194

09.03.2017 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

09.03.2017 8:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

08.03.2017 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Utetheisa / Vasiliy Feoktistov Utetheisa pulchella / Alex Dumchus.

08.03.2017 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Utetheisa / Vasiliy Feoktistov Utetheisa pulchella / Alex Dumchus.

08.03.2017 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gnathothlibus erotus Theretra pallicosta.

08.03.2017 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gnathothlibus erotus Theretra pallicosta.

08.03.2017 9:15, Alex Dumchus:

Theretra pallicosta

08.03.2017 9:12, Alex Dumchus:

Utetheisa pulchella

07.03.2017 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

07.03.2017 14:08, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Хорошо. Mts - всего лишь обычное сокращение в англ. языке, как у нас "г." перед названием горы, чтобы полностью не писать

07.03.2017 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

07.03.2017 12:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.03.2017 12:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Silphinae Phosphuga atrata.

07.03.2017 12:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Silphinae Phosphuga atrata.

07.03.2017 12:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Silphinae Phosphuga atrata.

07.03.2017 12:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Rutelinae Mimela testaceipes.

07.03.2017 12:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Rutelinae Mimela testaceipes.

07.03.2017 12:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Melolonthinae Holotrichia sichotana.

07.03.2017 12:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Melolonthinae Holotrichia sichotana.

07.03.2017 12:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Scarabaeidae / Irina Nikulina Holotrichia diomphalia / Evgeny Komarov.

07.03.2017 12:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Scarabaeidae / Irina Nikulina Holotrichia diomphalia / Evgeny Komarov.

07.03.2017 12:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Scarabaeidae Holotrichia diomphalia.

07.03.2017 12:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Amphimallon solstitiale / Evgeny Komarov.

07.03.2017 12:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Amphimallon solstitiale / Evgeny Komarov.

07.03.2017 12:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Amphimallon solstitiale / Evgeny Komarov.

07.03.2017 7:21, Alexander Belousov:

06.03.2017 23:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Elateridae Selatosomus aeneus.

06.03.2017 16:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Sypnoides picta / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.03.2017 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catoptria / Irina Nikulina.

06.03.2017 16:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Xanthorhoe abraxina / Irina Nikulina.

06.03.2017 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Epirrhoe supergressa / Irina Nikulina.

06.03.2017 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pandemis dumetana / Irina Nikulina.

06.03.2017 16:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Euproctis similis / Irina Nikulina.

06.03.2017 11:12, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Это Polygonia haroldii Dewitz, 1877

05.03.2017 0:39, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Скорее самка Ornithoptera goliathus, чем приама

04.03.2017 23:50, Irina Nikulina:

04.03.2017 23:20, Irina Nikulina:

Holotrichia sichotana?

04.03.2017 23:19, Irina Nikulina:

Holotrichia sichotana?

04.03.2017 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

Holotrichia diomphalia ?

04.03.2017 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Mimela testaceipes ?

04.03.2017 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Mimela testaceipes ?

04.03.2017 23:11, Irina Nikulina:

Phosphuga atrata ?

04.03.2017 23:05, Irina Nikulina:

Luciola mongolica ?

04.03.2017 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papilio menestheus menestheus / Andrey Polstyanoy Papilio lormieri / Alex Dumchus.

04.03.2017 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Fulgoraecia melanoleuca.

04.03.2017 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Fulgoraecia melanoleuca / Female.

04.03.2017 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Fulgoraecia melanoleuca / Male & female.

04.03.2017 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Fulgoraecia melanoleuca.

04.03.2017 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Fulgoraecia melanoleuca.

04.03.2017 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Fulgoraecia melanoleuca.

04.03.2017 11:40, SK Duttamajumder: This species is identified correctly.

04.03.2017 11:03, SK Duttamajumder: This species is identified correctly.

04.03.2017 11:02, SK Duttamajumder: This species is identified correctly.

04.03.2017 10:03, Evgeny Komarov:

>>>>

04.03.2017 9:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Rutelinae Popillia quadriguttata.

04.03.2017 9:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Rutelinae Popillia quadriguttata.

03.03.2017 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Zygogramma bicolorata / SK Duttamajumder.

03.03.2017 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Zygogramma bicolorata / SK Duttamajumder.

03.03.2017 13:57, SK Duttamajumder: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2017 13:56, SK Duttamajumder: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2017 22:33, Irina Nikulina:

Popillia quadriguttata ?

02.03.2017 22:33, Irina Nikulina:

02.03.2017 21:23, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Gonepteryx eversi. В базе сайта вида почему-то нет.

02.03.2017 18:55, Alex Dumchus:

02.03.2017 18:39, Alex Dumchus:

02.03.2017 15:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Attacus atlas Attacus lemairei.

02.03.2017 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.03.2017 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

02.03.2017 6:57, Alex Dumchus:

01.03.2017 22:04, Igor Ivannikov:

Attacus lemairei Peigler,1985.

01.03.2017 21:56, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Эта тоже не из моего собрания. Лыгины знаю, у меня в коллекции они как раз и стоят, те действительно не фурштофери. Пути покупки этой не знаю, надо уточнять.

01.03.2017 21:54, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Фото испода на данный момент нет. Сделать его смогу разве что в середине лета, когда в Беларусь в гости к влаельцу коллекции хочу добраться.

01.03.2017 21:51, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Так было написано на этикетке у владельца коллекции. Поэтому так и написал. Надо бы уточнить дифференциальные признаки видов.

01.03.2017 21:19, Alex Dumchus:

01.03.2017 21:16, Alex Dumchus:

01.03.2017 21:09, Alex Dumchus:

28.02.2017 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And today, in addition, I learned that this is also a new subspecies Rhamnusium bicolor constans Danilevsky, 2012, which Danilevsky cites for eastern Europe. Link to revision: http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/pdf/danilevski_2012hh.pdf
P.S. WELL, when, finally, will it be possible to work with subspecies???

27.02.2017 19:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Silpha carinata / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov Aclypea undata / Confidently identified / Dmitry Vtorushin.

26.02.2017 16:47, Dmitry Vtorushin:

26.02.2017 16:44, Dmitry Vtorushin:

26.02.2017 8:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.02.2017 8:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.02.2017 23:29, Evgeny Komarov:

25.02.2017 23:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Silpha carinata / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

25.02.2017 23:18, Evgeny Komarov:

25.02.2017 23:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Nicrophorus nepalensis / Evgeny Komarov.

25.02.2017 23:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Nicrophorus nepalensis / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 10:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Irek Yusupov Byctiscus populi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 10:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Irek Yusupov Byctiscus populi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 9:49, Evgeny Komarov:

24.02.2017 9:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

24.02.2017 9:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Abax / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 9:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tenebrionidae / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Corticeus bicolor / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 9:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

24.02.2017 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.02.2017 9:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dermestidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Attagenus unicolor / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 8:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Vladimir Bobow Harmonia axyridis / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 7:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cantharis livida / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 7:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Chrysolina fastuosa / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 7:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Chrysolina fastuosa / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2017 1:13, Irina Nikulina:

24.02.2017 1:13, Irina Nikulina:

24.02.2017 1:10, Irina Nikulina:

Pandemis dumetana

24.02.2017 0:57, Irina Nikulina:

24.02.2017 0:35, Irina Nikulina:

24.02.2017 0:15, Irina Nikulina:

Euproctis similis

24.02.2017 0:12, Irina Nikulina:

Xanthorhoe abraxina

24.02.2017 0:11, Irina Nikulina:

21.02.2017 18:04, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Stiroma bicarinata

21.02.2017 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Agonopterix furvella / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2017 15:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Lycaena phlaeas.

21.02.2017 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Irek Yusupov Netelia / Andrei Humala.

21.02.2017 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Irek Yusupov Netelia / Andrei Humala.

21.02.2017 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Irek Yusupov Netelia / Andrei Humala.

21.02.2017 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Irek Yusupov Netelia / Andrei Humala.

21.02.2017 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Irek Yusupov Netelia / Andrei Humala.

20.02.2017 23:33, Andrei Humala:

Netelia sp. (Tryphoninae)

20.02.2017 23:32, Andrei Humala:

Netelia sp. (Tryphoninae)

19.02.2017 20:57, Oleg Nikolsky:

19.02.2017 15:49, Nikolai Vladimirov:

18.02.2017 20:45, Juri Palamarchuk:

Edwardsiana geometrica

18.02.2017 20:01, Nikolai Vladimirov:

18.02.2017 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.02.2017 22:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Malacosoma neustria / Irina Nikulina.

17.02.2017 22:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Herpetogramma luctuosalis / Irina Nikulina.

17.02.2017 22:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Saturniidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Caio championi / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

17.02.2017 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.02.2017 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturniidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.02.2017 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicadidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.02.2017 14:05, Irina Nikulina:

Herpetogramma luctuosalis

17.02.2017 14:05, Irina Nikulina:

15.02.2017 14:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Theophilea cylindricollis Theophilea subcylindricollis.

15.02.2017 14:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Theophilea cylindricollis Theophilea subcylindricollis.

15.02.2017 14:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Theophilea cylindricollis Theophilea subcylindricollis.

14.02.2017 17:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.02.2017 17:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

14.02.2017 17:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.02.2017 22:13, Ryan Brookes:

Dysphania sagana Druce

12.02.2017 16:27, Shamil Murtazin:

12.02.2017 10:20, Alex Dumchus:

12.02.2017 0:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.02.2017 22:37, Nikolai Vladimirov:

11.02.2017 22:19, Igor Ivannikov:

11.02.2017 21:54, Shamil Murtazin:

11.02.2017 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.02.2017 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Antigius butleri / Female / Irina Nikulina.

10.02.2017 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Ematurga atomaria / Male / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2017 21:12, Irina Nikulina:

09.02.2017 20:55, Irina Nikulina:

08.02.2017 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Calliteara pseudabietis / Male / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2017 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Elaphria venustula / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2017 12:40, Irina Nikulina:

08.02.2017 12:25, Irina Nikulina:

08.02.2017 11:55, Irina Nikulina:

Elaphria venustula

08.02.2017 11:49, Irina Nikulina:

07.02.2017 15:09, Irina Nikulina:

07.02.2017 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Tortricidae.

05.02.2017 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.02.2017 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.02.2017 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nikolai Vladimirov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.02.2017 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.02.2017 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nikolai Vladimirov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.02.2017 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.02.2017 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nikolai Vladimirov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.02.2017 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.02.2017 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nikolai Vladimirov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.02.2017 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.02.2017 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nikolai Vladimirov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.02.2017 16:45, Nikolai Vladimirov:

05.02.2017 16:32, Shamil Murtazin:

05.02.2017 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

05.02.2017 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Irina Nikulina.

05.02.2017 14:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Irina Nikulina.

05.02.2017 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Irina Nikulina.

05.02.2017 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Paolo Mazzei Irina Nikulina.

05.02.2017 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Timandra comae / Tentatively identified / Paolo Mazzei.

05.02.2017 14:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Irina Nikulina.

05.02.2017 14:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Irina Nikulina.

05.02.2017 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Irina Nikulina.

05.02.2017 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2017 20:08, Andrey Polstyanoy: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2017 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

04.02.2017 13:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Nomophila noctuella / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2017 13:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

04.02.2017 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hypsopygia costalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2017 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hypsopygia costalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2017 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hypsopygia costalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2017 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Irek Yusupov Mythimna ferrago / Nikolay Grebennikov.

04.02.2017 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Irek Yusupov Mythimna ferrago / Nikolay Grebennikov.

04.02.2017 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Irek Yusupov Mythimna ferrago / Nikolay Grebennikov.

04.02.2017 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Irek Yusupov Mythimna ferrago / Nikolay Grebennikov.

04.02.2017 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lenisa geminipuncta / Evgeny Komarov Archanara neurica / Basil Sergienko.

04.02.2017 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lenisa geminipuncta / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov Archanara neurica / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.02.2017 9:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

04.02.2017 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Paralebeda plagifera.

04.02.2017 0:55, Irek Yusupov:

Noctuidae?

02.02.2017 17:15, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Mythimna ferrago.

02.02.2017 14:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Myrmecoris gracilis Myrmecophyes alboornatus.

02.02.2017 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Myrmecoris gracilis Myrmecophyes alboornatus.

02.02.2017 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Myrmecoris gracilis Myrmecophyes alboornatus.

02.02.2017 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Myrmecoris gracilis Myrmecophyes alboornatus.

01.02.2017 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Clostera anastomosis / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2017 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trichoptera Lepidoptera.

01.02.2017 13:19, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna ferrago

01.02.2017 13:14, Irina Nikulina:

Timandra comae?

01.02.2017 13:09, Irina Nikulina:

Hypsopygia costalis

01.02.2017 13:08, Irina Nikulina:

Hypsopygia costalis

01.02.2017 10:35, Irina Nikulina:

Clostera anastomosis

01.02.2017 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Trichoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.02.2017 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Trichoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.02.2017 8:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anisorus quercus Stenocorus meridianus.

31.01.2017 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plaesiorrhina plana / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

31.01.2017 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plaesiorrhina plana / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

31.01.2017 21:09, Yuri Rogozin:

Plaesiorrhina plana (Wiedemann, 1821)

31.01.2017 12:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

31.01.2017 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Paloma Sevilla Juri Palamarchuk.

31.01.2017 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Discoelius / Confidently identified / Paloma Sevilla.

31.01.2017 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Membracidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Membracidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ichneumonidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ichneumonidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ichneumonidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ichneumonidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2017 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ichneumonidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.01.2017 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Alexandr Zhakov Pelurga comitata / Nikolay Grebennikov.

30.01.2017 17:43, Nikolay Grebennikov:

30.01.2017 12:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Geometridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.01.2017 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pterophoroidea / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Emmelina monodactyla / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.01.2017 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pterophoroidea / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Emmelina monodactyla / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.01.2017 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pterophoroidea / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Emmelina monodactyla / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.01.2017 11:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Nomophila noctuella / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.01.2017 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

29.01.2017 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.01.2017 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.01.2017 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.01.2017 11:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhyacia simulans / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.01.2017 4:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.01.2017 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hadena variolata / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ectropis excellens / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 23:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ectropis excellens / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 23:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Crambus alienellus / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 23:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Crambus alienellus / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 23:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysoteuchia culmella / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysoteuchia / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysoteuchia / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Operophtera brunnea / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Acleris aurichalcana / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eilicrinia wehrlii / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eilicrinia wehrlii / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Phthonosema tendinosaria / Male / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Pyrrhia bifasciata / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Maliattha bella / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Euchristophia cumulata / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.01.2017 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.01.2017 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hadena variolata / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 22:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eugraphe sigma / Irina Nikulina.

26.01.2017 12:55, Irina Nikulina:

Hadena variolata

26.01.2017 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eudicella tetraspilota Eudicella tetraspilota euthalia.

26.01.2017 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eudicella tetraspilota Eudicella tetraspilota euthalia.

26.01.2017 11:19, Irina Nikulina:

Eugraphe sigma

26.01.2017 9:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

26.01.2017 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

26.01.2017 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eudicella tetraspilota Eudicella tetraspilota euthalia.

26.01.2017 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eudicella smithii Eudicella tetraspilota euthalia.

26.01.2017 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eudicella smithii Eudicella tetraspilota euthalia.

26.01.2017 8:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella tetraspilota euthalia / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

26.01.2017 8:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eudicella smithii Eudicella tetraspilota euthalia.

26.01.2017 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella smithii / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

26.01.2017 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella smithii / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

26.01.2017 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella smithii / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

26.01.2017 7:47, Yuri Rogozin:

Eudicella euthalia

26.01.2017 7:47, Yuri Rogozin:

Eudicella euthalia

24.01.2017 18:47, Irina Nikulina:

Ectropis excellens

24.01.2017 18:10, Irina Nikulina:

Olethreutinae

24.01.2017 18:05, Irina Nikulina:

Crambus alienellus

24.01.2017 17:37, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysoteuchia culmella ussuriella (Bleszynski, 1962)

24.01.2017 17:37, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysoteuchia sp.

24.01.2017 17:36, Irina Nikulina:

24.01.2017 17:09, Irina Nikulina:

Acleris aurichalcana

24.01.2017 16:34, Irina Nikulina:

Operophtera brunnea

24.01.2017 16:14, Irina Nikulina:

Eilicrinia wehrlii

24.01.2017 15:27, Irina Nikulina:

Phthonosema tendinosarium

24.01.2017 13:25, Irina Nikulina:

Pyrrhia bifasciata

24.01.2017 13:25, Irina Nikulina:

Maliattha bella

24.01.2017 13:24, Irina Nikulina:

Euchristophia cumulata

24.01.2017 4:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Scarabaeidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2017 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Chrysomelidae / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2017 11:47, Ryan Brookes:

I think it belongs to the family Lasiocampidae.

22.01.2017 8:37, Shamil Murtazin:

21.01.2017 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Scarabaeidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Rutelinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cassidinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Buprestidae / Ivan Pristrem Agrilus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Buprestidae / Ivan Pristrem Eurythyrea aurata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Konstantin Kraevsky Dryophthoridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Scarabaeidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Chrysomelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Elateridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Harmonia axyridis / Ivan Tislenko.

21.01.2017 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Harmonia axyridis / Ivan Tislenko.

21.01.2017 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Curculionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.01.2017 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexander Boldyrev.

21.01.2017 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexander Boldyrev.

21.01.2017 9:16, Ryan Brookes:

Vasiliy, I wonder if this is the adult of a 'glow-worm' which you have identified as Lampyridae. Please see http://insecta.pro/gallery/61621

21.01.2017 9:09, Ryan Brookes:

Correction: this is Pardoxia graellsi (Feisthamel, 1837). Please update.

19.01.2017 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

19.01.2017 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protaetia metallica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.01.2017 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #60502 group.

19.01.2017 20:14, Sergeyy Tjabut:

18.01.2017 21:33, Ryan Brookes:

Certainly there is no better place than Moscow for the event. I have visited Moscow before and look forward to the exhibition and discussion.

18.01.2017 1:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

18.01.2017 1:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protaetia metallica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.01.2017 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmoclopius nigroannulatus / Confidently identified / Galgo Dela.

17.01.2017 21:25, Ivan Pristrem:

17.01.2017 17:33, Peter Khramov:

17.01.2017 16:52, Ivan Pristrem:

17.01.2017 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

17.01.2017 14:09, Alex Dumchus:

17.01.2017 14:05, Alex Dumchus:

17.01.2017 13:07, Ryan Brookes:

Leptotes plinius (Fabricius, 1793)
See http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/50919

17.01.2017 13:01, Peter Khramov:

17.01.2017 9:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

17.01.2017 8:50, Ivan Pristrem:

17.01.2017 0:56, Peter Khramov:

17.01.2017 0:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.01.2017 23:59, Peter Khramov:

16.01.2017 20:43, Irina Nikulina:

16.01.2017 20:21, Galgo Dela:

Cosmoclopius nigroannulatus (Stål) Fam Reduviidae

16.01.2017 17:45, Peter Khramov:

16.01.2017 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.01.2017 17:18, Peter Khramov:

16.01.2017 16:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.01.2017 16:56, Ivan Tislenko:

16.01.2017 16:49, Peter Khramov:

16.01.2017 16:41, Peter Khramov:

16.01.2017 16:21, Ivan Tislenko:

16.01.2017 16:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

16.01.2017 16:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

16.01.2017 15:57, Peter Khramov:

16.01.2017 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.01.2017 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dichocrocis.

16.01.2017 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Ryan Brookes.

16.01.2017 10:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Clepsis pallidana / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2017 10:18, Ivan Tislenko:

16.01.2017 10:07, Ivan Tislenko:

16.01.2017 1:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.01.2017 0:48, Peter Khramov:

16.01.2017 0:46, Peter Khramov:

15.01.2017 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

15.01.2017 19:06, Peter Khramov:

15.01.2017 18:49, Peter Khramov:

15.01.2017 15:19, Shamil Murtazin:

15.01.2017 12:58, Ivan Pristrem:

15.01.2017 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

15.01.2017 11:17, Peter Khramov:

15.01.2017 11:16, Peter Khramov:

15.01.2017 9:43, Ivan Pristrem:

14.01.2017 20:25, Shamil Murtazin:

14.01.2017 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.01.2017 16:27, Ivan Pristrem:

14.01.2017 16:05, Shamil Murtazin:

14.01.2017 15:57, Ivan Pristrem:

14.01.2017 15:57, Peter Khramov:

14.01.2017 13:11, Alex Dumchus:

14.01.2017 9:20, Shamil Murtazin:

13.01.2017 21:43, Peter Khramov:

13.01.2017 21:42, Peter Khramov:

13.01.2017 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus maximus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

13.01.2017 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus maximus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

13.01.2017 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus maximus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

13.01.2017 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus maximus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

13.01.2017 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus maximus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

13.01.2017 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolucanus maximus / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

13.01.2017 21:04, Ivan Pristrem:

13.01.2017 21:01, Peter Khramov:

13.01.2017 20:59, Shamil Murtazin:

13.01.2017 20:57, Shamil Murtazin:

13.01.2017 20:50, Ivan Pristrem:

13.01.2017 20:37, Peter Khramov:

13.01.2017 18:03, Peter Khramov:

13.01.2017 17:48, Peter Khramov:

13.01.2017 17:29, Peter Khramov:

13.01.2017 16:34, Peter Khramov:

13.01.2017 14:23, Ivan Pristrem:

13.01.2017 12:49, Ivan Tislenko:

13.01.2017 10:50, Alex Dumchus:

13.01.2017 6:37, Yuri Rogozin:

Neolucanus maximus

13.01.2017 6:36, Yuri Rogozin:

Neolucanus maximus

13.01.2017 2:51, Peter Khramov:

In September 2017, Insecta.pro (former Lepidoptera.ru/Lepidoptera.pro) and its community hits 10 years. Nothing is wrong with boozing it up!
It may seem a little too soon to discuss such an event but you know how it is: somebody always «just can't» because of «why couldn't you tell me earlier».
So.
Let's begin the discussion without any chances for procrastination and some people going under the radar at that same time.
I suggest we meet this autumn to celebrate and get acquainted (if you haven't yet). How about Moscow/Russia for the place and annual entomological exhibition for the time? Any other ideas are welcomed too!
Share your thoughts and let's go wild.

PS. The first website news (2007): http://insecta.pro/ru/community/950.

13.01.2017 2:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

12.01.2017 23:56, Peter Khramov:

12.01.2017 19:23, Peter Khramov:

12.01.2017 13:03, Peter Khramov:

12.01.2017 8:40, Ivan Pristrem:

12.01.2017 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

12.01.2017 7:28, Shamil Murtazin:

12.01.2017 2:24, Peter Khramov:

12.01.2017 2:23, Peter Khramov:

11.01.2017 23:03, Peter Khramov:

11.01.2017 22:28, Shamil Murtazin:

11.01.2017 20:41, Peter Khramov:

11.01.2017 19:36, Alex Dumchus:

11.01.2017 18:46, Ivan Pristrem:

11.01.2017 16:51, Peter Khramov:

11.01.2017 14:46, Peter Khramov:

11.01.2017 13:41, Peter Khramov:

11.01.2017 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.01.2017 23:03, Peter Khramov:

10.01.2017 20:39, Peter Khramov:

10.01.2017 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.01.2017 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2017 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.01.2017 13:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

10.01.2017 13:15, Peter Khramov:

10.01.2017 12:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.01.2017 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.01.2017 12:02, Peter Khramov:

10.01.2017 11:46, Peter Khramov:

10.01.2017 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

10.01.2017 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

10.01.2017 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Agriphila straminella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.01.2017 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Agriphila straminella / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.01.2017 10:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gymnoscelis rufifasciata Nycterosea obstipata.

10.01.2017 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2017 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula / Nikolay Grebennikov Scopula ochraceata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2017 10:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula / Nikolay Grebennikov Idaea straminata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2017 10:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Nikolay Grebennikov Isturgia murinaria / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2017 10:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Nikolay Grebennikov Isturgia murinaria / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2017 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Paracolax tristalis.

10.01.2017 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nikolay Grebennikov Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2017 2:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.01.2017 1:05, Shamil Murtazin:

09.01.2017 23:16, Peter Khramov:

09.01.2017 21:14, Peter Khramov:

09.01.2017 20:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

09.01.2017 20:19, Peter Khramov:

09.01.2017 18:49, Shamil Murtazin:

09.01.2017 16:29, Peter Khramov:

08.01.2017 16:44, Fyodor Pudovikov:

07.01.2017 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Graphosoma lineatum / Sergeyy Tjabut.

07.01.2017 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.01.2017 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.01.2017 21:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

http://www.pyralidsofborneo.org/index.php?plates-1-10

06.01.2017 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06.01.2017 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Erthesina Erthesina acuminata.

06.01.2017 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06.01.2017 16:05, Svetlana Shchavelina:

06.01.2017 14:23, Peter Khramov:

06.01.2017 6:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06.01.2017 6:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #61682 group.

06.01.2017 6:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Sergeyy Tjabut Nicrophorus vespillo / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.01.2017 6:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Sergeyy Tjabut Nicrophorus vespillo / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.01.2017 5:30, Ryan Brookes:

Eudocima sp.

05.01.2017 17:53, Ryan Brookes:

I beleive this is Hypochrosis hyadaria.

While there is some general similarity between species of Heterolocha that resemble Hypochrosis hyadaria I will point out a few noticeable differences based on images found on the internet.

In Hypochrosis hyadaria the antemedial and postmedial lines of both wings are distinct and nearly straight. The forewing postmedial line is highly angled just below the costa before the apex.

In species of Heterolocha that resemble Hypochrosis hyadaria you will find that these lines are curved and often indistinct or diffuse. The forewing antemedial line is irregular or crenulate and is curved upwards closer to the base of the costa. In Hypochrosis hyadaria it meets the costa nearly at the middle. Also, Hypochrosis hyadaria does not possess the hindwing cell spot as seen in Heterolocha.

Therefore, your specimen is Hypochrosis hyadaria.

Here is an image of a specimen at BOLD Systems that closely matches yours. It has been erroneously determined as a Heterolocha sp.
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=466129

05.01.2017 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lampyridae?

05.01.2017 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lampyridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.01.2017 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.01.2017 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Poecilium fasciatum / Dmitry Vtorushin.

05.01.2017 2:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.01.2017 2:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Erthesina / Ryan Brookes.

04.01.2017 11:54, Ryan Brookes:

Thank you, Peter! I guess I missed the party. :-) I wish you all a very happy new year 2017. All the best! This is a great website. Congratulations on its 10th anniversary! Keep up the good work.

Regards,

Ryan

03.01.2017 22:27, Peter Khramov:

03.01.2017 2:57, Peter Khramov:

02.01.2017 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Protaetia brevitarsis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.01.2017 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera Oxyporus procerus.

02.01.2017 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.01.2017 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectobiinae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.01.2017 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

01.01.2017 22:53, Shamil Murtazin:

01.01.2017 15:51, Igor Ivannikov:

01.01.2017 14:06, Shamil Murtazin:

01.01.2017 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

31.12.2016 20:09, Shamil Murtazin:

31.12.2016 18:10, Yuri Rogozin:

Happy New Year to all!!!

31.12.2016 18:02, Peter Khramov:

31.12.2016 16:14, Irina Nikulina:

31.12.2016 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

31.12.2016 13:19, Peter Khramov:

31.12.2016 13:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Join' your сongratulations )
Happy New Year !!!

31.12.2016 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Curculionidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.12.2016 22:38, Shamil Murtazin:

30.12.2016 5:07, Peter Khramov:

29.12.2016 17:56, Peter Khramov:

Hey, guys!
Some of you don't visit our site daily, so it's time to start celebrating bit by bit. I wish you 2017 will be even much more better then 2016!
Some site updates will be made just by the beginning of the year – expanded gallery and market, and in addition taxa tree corrections.
Besides the website will celibate its 10th birthday in 2017! That surely calls for a drink!
Cheers!

29.12.2016 17:09, Yuri Rogozin:

29.12.2016 11:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Clarification about the species of Morozov P. on: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235476&pid=1651906&st=400&#entry1651906

29.12.2016 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hagapteryx mirabilior Hagapteryx kishidai.

29.12.2016 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hagapteryx mirabilior Hagapteryx kishidai.

29.12.2016 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identified by P. Morozov on Molbiol : http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235476&pid=1651906&st=400&#entry1651906

29.12.2016 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identified by P. Morozov on Molbiol: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235476&pid=1651906&st=400&#entry1651906

29.12.2016 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tarsolepis Tarsolepis malayana.

29.12.2016 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tarsolepis Tarsolepis malayana.

29.12.2016 7:32, Ryan Brookes:

The whole album is great! I must have played it a thousand times over.

28.12.2016 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Re-identified by Morozov P. at http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235476&pid=1651846&st=400&#entry1651846

28.12.2016 20:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hagapteryx mirabilior Hagapteryx admirabilis.

28.12.2016 19:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Endotricha flammealis / Confidently identified / Male & female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.12.2016 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

27.12.2016 22:37, Peter Khramov:

27.12.2016 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #61354 group.

27.12.2016 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protocerius rufifrons / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

27.12.2016 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

27.12.2016 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #61355 group.

27.12.2016 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protocerius rufifrons / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

27.12.2016 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protocerius rufifrons / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

27.12.2016 21:21, Peter Khramov:

27.12.2016 20:23, Yuri Rogozin:

Protocerius rufifrons Heller, 1915

27.12.2016 20:23, Yuri Rogozin:

Protocerius rufifrons Heller, 1915

27.12.2016 20:22, Yuri Rogozin:

Protocerius rufifrons Heller, 1915

27.12.2016 20:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

27.12.2016 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ptilophora jezoensis Ptilophora nohirae.

27.12.2016 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bandar pascoei / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

27.12.2016 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bandar pascoei / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

27.12.2016 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bandar pascoei / Confidently identified / Yuri Rogozin.

27.12.2016 16:45, Yuri Rogozin:

Macrotoma pascoe

27.12.2016 16:45, Yuri Rogozin:

Macrotoma pascoe

27.12.2016 16:44, Yuri Rogozin:

Macrotoma pascoe

27.12.2016 16:43, Yuri Rogozin:

26.12.2016 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Endotricha flammealis?

26.12.2016 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

26.12.2016 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

26.12.2016 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Arhopala vihara / Imago / Alex Dumchus Arhopala arvina / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.12.2016 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Arhopala vihara / Imago / Alex Dumchus Arhopala arvina / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.12.2016 19:24, Alex Dumchus:

>>>>

26.12.2016 11:37, Peter Khramov:

26.12.2016 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

25.12.2016 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

25.12.2016 20:58, Igor Ivannikov:

25.12.2016 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.12.2016 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.12.2016 4:43, Galgo Dela:

Mariposa bruja (Ascalapha odorata) Fam Noctuidae

24.12.2016 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Earlier Russian comments appeared at the English version of the website only after their translation and there was just an empty space till then. Same works for English comments.
Now instead of the empty space, comments are displayed in their original language till the translating. Another words, original comments in English will appear at the Russian version of the website and Russian comments at the English one.
Again, it works only if comment have not been translated yet.
These changes are applied to the next sections:
— Photos pages: Author's comment, Shooting place, Users comments
— Species and other taxa pages: Users comments
— Community section: Topic starter's and Users comments
— Users comments and news on the pages right blocks
Perhaps it's worth to apply such an approach species description in the future as it's more smooth for current users. And unlike the empty space, comment can be translated after all.
Any comments regarding the topic are welcome.

24.12.2016 22:01, Peter Khramov:

24.12.2016 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.12.2016 20:37, Peter Khramov:

24.12.2016 20:36, Peter Khramov:

24.12.2016 20:34, Peter Khramov:

24.12.2016 20:33, Peter Khramov:

24.12.2016 20:31, Peter Khramov:

24.12.2016 20:31, Peter Khramov:

I put a comment on the photo. I removed it from the species page.

24.12.2016 20:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Favonius / Irina Nikulina.

24.12.2016 20:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Scolitantides orion / Irina Nikulina.

24.12.2016 20:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Anania coronata / Irina Nikulina.

24.12.2016 20:13, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, do you have any objections?

24.12.2016 1:49, Galgo Dela: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2016 1:27, Galgo Dela: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2016 1:06, Galgo Dela: This species is identified correctly.

23.12.2016 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.12.2016 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cryptalaus lacteus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.12.2016 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cryptalaus lacteus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.12.2016 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cryptalaus lacteus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.12.2016 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.12.2016 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.12.2016 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.12.2016 15:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male Arhopala arvina.

23.12.2016 0:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Camptogramma bilineata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.12.2016 23:16, Irina Nikulina:

Camptogramma bilineata

22.12.2016 17:21, Irina Nikulina:

22.12.2016 17:12, Irina Nikulina:

Scolitantides orion

22.12.2016 17:06, Irina Nikulina:

Anania coronata

20.12.2016 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.12.2016 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.12.2016 18:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.12.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.12.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.12.2016 13:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.12.2016 13:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.12.2016 1:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.12.2016 1:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.12.2016 1:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.12.2016 21:31, Galgo Dela: This species is identified correctly.

19.12.2016 21:30, Galgo Dela: This species is identified correctly.

19.12.2016 21:22, Galgo Dela: This species is identified correctly.

19.12.2016 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.12.2016 5:56, Ryan Brookes: This species is identified correctly.

19.12.2016 5:18, Ryan Brookes: This species is identified correctly.

18.12.2016 10:26, Ryan Brookes:

Calesia sp. (Erebidae: Tinoliinae)

possibly Calesia dasypterus (Kollar, 1844)

18.12.2016 9:38, Ryan Brookes:

Note that the labial palps seen in this specimen are characteristic of some microlepidoptera.

18.12.2016 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.12.2016 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.12.2016 6:05, Ryan Brookes:

Family Lecithoceridae

18.12.2016 6:00, Ryan Brookes:

Ptychopseustis sp. (Crambidae: Cybalomiinae)

17.12.2016 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Diamesus osculans / Dmitry Vtorushin.

17.12.2016 14:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Neville DMello.

17.12.2016 12:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Only the Editor can perform such actions. And in the author's comments, only the author can write (Well, the Editor, probably). :0

17.12.2016 11:34, Sergey Novitckiy:

Yes, I'm sorry! Is it possible to move a comment to this page?

17.12.2016 11:32, Sergey Novitckiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.12.2016 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.12.2016 19:13, Peter Khramov:

16.12.2016 14:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, you wrote in the comments to the species that it is not correct, because new photos may appear defined by someone else. And the author’s comments are where you write: wingspan 13mm

16.12.2016 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, indicate in the author's comments who identified it. :)

16.12.2016 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cochylidia rupicola Phalonidia affinitana.

16.12.2016 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cochylidia rupicola Phalonidia affinitana.

16.12.2016 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

15.12.2016 22:50, Sergey Novitckiy:

Wrong definition. V.Kavurka (Institute of Zoology, Kiev) examine this specimen - it turned out to be Phalonidia affinitana.

15.12.2016 22:49, Sergey Novitckiy:

Wrong definition. V. Kavurka (Institute of Zoology, Kyiv) examine this specimen - it turned out to be Phalonidia affinitana.

15.12.2016 20:14, Irina Nikulina:

15.12.2016 18:07, Evgeny Komarov:

15.12.2016 12:03, Shamil Murtazin:

15.12.2016 0:41, Irina Nikulina:

It’s strange, but I have all the markers here in place, including 2 of yours in the Barabash-Levada surrounding area. Evgeniy, are the checkboxes above the map checked?

14.12.2016 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ourapteryx sambucaria / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov Ourapteryx ussurica / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

14.12.2016 7:58, Evgeny Komarov:

This photo basically refuses to stick with the map. "Naked" map without dots!

14.12.2016 7:52, Evgeny Komarov:

12.12.2016 9:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nebria rufescens Nebria ochotica.

12.12.2016 9:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nebria rufescens Nebria ochotica.

09.12.2016 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eupatorus gracillicornis / Yuri Rogozin.

09.12.2016 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eupatorus gracillicornis / Yuri Rogozin.

09.12.2016 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eupatorus gracillicornis / Yuri Rogozin.

09.12.2016 21:47, Yuri Rogozin:

eupatorus gracilicornis

09.12.2016 21:47, Yuri Rogozin:

eupatorus gracilicornis

09.12.2016 21:33, Yuri Rogozin:

eupatorus gracilicornis

08.12.2016 10:42, Shamil Murtazin:

08.12.2016 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

07.12.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.12.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.12.2016 20:27, Vladimir Bryukhov:

07.12.2016 20:26, Vladimir Bryukhov:

07.12.2016 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.12.2016 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.12.2016 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.12.2016 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.12.2016 12:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.12.2016 12:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.12.2016 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06.12.2016 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.12.2016 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.12.2016 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.12.2016 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

03.12.2016 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

03.12.2016 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Furcula bicuspis.

03.12.2016 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Furcula bicuspis.

03.12.2016 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Brachycera / Irek Yusupov Tephritidae / Fedor Ovechkin.

03.12.2016 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Brachycera / Irek Yusupov Tephritidae / Fedor Ovechkin.

03.12.2016 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Brachycera / Irek Yusupov Tephritidae / Fedor Ovechkin.

03.12.2016 1:26, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tephritidae

03.12.2016 1:26, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tephritidae

03.12.2016 1:26, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tephritidae

02.12.2016 9:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amara / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.12.2016 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

01.12.2016 21:43, Peter Khramov:

01.12.2016 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

01.12.2016 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

01.12.2016 16:38, Shamil Murtazin:

30.11.2016 23:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

30.11.2016 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

30.11.2016 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

30.11.2016 21:12, Peter Khramov:

30.11.2016 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

30.11.2016 19:08, Peter Khramov:

29.11.2016 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

29.11.2016 15:49, Victor Shilenkov: This species is identified correctly.

28.11.2016 22:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Comostola laesaria / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2016 22:02, Peter Khramov:

28.11.2016 21:41, Irina Nikulina:

Comostola laesaria

28.11.2016 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Campylotes desgodinsi.

28.11.2016 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Campylotes desgodinsi.

28.11.2016 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Epicopeia hainesii.

28.11.2016 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Epicopeia hainesii.

28.11.2016 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Parabraxas davidi / Alex Dumchus.

28.11.2016 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Parabraxas davidi / Alex Dumchus.

28.11.2016 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Nepita conferta / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2016 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Nepita conferta / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2016 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Nepita conferta / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2016 16:16, Irina Nikulina:

Nepita conferta

28.11.2016 16:14, Irina Nikulina:

Nepita conferta

28.11.2016 16:12, Irina Nikulina:

28.11.2016 11:49, Alex Dumchus:

28.11.2016 11:47, Alex Dumchus:

Epicopeia hainesii Holland 1889

28.11.2016 11:40, Alex Dumchus:

Campylotes desgodinsi

28.11.2016 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

28.11.2016 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cyaniris semiargus.

26.11.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sasakia funebris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.11.2016 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sasakia funebris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.11.2016 16:06, Alex Dumchus:

Sasakia funebris Leech, 1891

25.11.2016 17:00, Alex Lender:

25.11.2016 10:13, Fyodor Pudovikov:

25.11.2016 8:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyhymno / Confidently identified / Viktoria Dubinina.

25.11.2016 8:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.11.2016 6:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

24.11.2016 23:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.11.2016 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

23.11.2016 19:50, Peter Khramov:

22.11.2016 23:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Larerannis orthogrammaria / Irina Nikulina.

22.11.2016 23:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Larerannis orthogrammaria / Irina Nikulina.

22.11.2016 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pachyerannis obliquaria / Irina Nikulina.

22.11.2016 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pachyerannis obliquaria / Irina Nikulina.

22.11.2016 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Acropteris iphiata / Yuri Semejkin.

22.11.2016 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

22.11.2016 20:21, Peter Khramov:

22.11.2016 20:20, Peter Khramov:

22.11.2016 19:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Please, fill place of catching =) Thank you!

22.11.2016 17:04, Irina Nikulina:

22.11.2016 16:18, Irina Nikulina:

Larerannis orthogrammaria

22.11.2016 16:17, Irina Nikulina:

Larerannis orthogrammaria

22.11.2016 15:20, Irina Nikulina:

Pachyerannis obliquaria

22.11.2016 15:19, Irina Nikulina:

Pachyerannis obliquaria

22.11.2016 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.11.2016 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.11.2016 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.11.2016 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chlaenius / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.11.2016 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.11.2016 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.11.2016 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.11.2016 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Broscus cephalotes / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.11.2016 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

22.11.2016 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Rhynocoris marginatus.

22.11.2016 9:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula caricaria / Alexandr Zhakov Scopula floslactata / Basil Sergienko.

21.11.2016 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterophoridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elateridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elateridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2016 17:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis ino / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.11.2016 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus lathoniellus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.11.2016 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cabera exanthemata / Sergeyy Tjabut Scopula caricaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.11.2016 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidiota stigma / Imago Leucopholis cretacea / Female.

19.11.2016 12:22, Ivan Pristrem:

18.11.2016 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Eunica monima.

18.11.2016 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Eunica monima.

18.11.2016 22:23, Alex Dumchus:

Eunica monima

18.11.2016 12:42, Irina Nikulina:

18.11.2016 7:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus Harpalus affinis.

17.11.2016 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Definitely not tridens: http://insectamo.ru/larva/98-hete/noctuidae/1292-acronicta-tridens This auricoma is not of the last age: http://insectamo.ru/larva/98-hete/noctuidae/1299-acronicta-auricoma Here: http://insectamo.ru/larva there are many in the Moscow region)

17.11.2016 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acronicta tridens / Vitaly Gumenuk Acronicta auricoma / Vladimir Bryukhov.

17.11.2016 22:08, Shamil Murtazin:

17.11.2016 20:29, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Isn't it Acronicta auricoma? http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acronicta_Auricoma

17.11.2016 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Harpalus affinis?

17.11.2016 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Harpalus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.11.2016 10:14, Elena Balueva:

17.11.2016 8:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

17.11.2016 8:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Chrysoteuchia culmella / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.11.2016 8:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

17.11.2016 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

17.11.2016 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

17.11.2016 8:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agrotis bigramma / Sergeyy Tjabut Agrotis exclamationis / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.11.2016 20:24, Ivan Tislenko:

16.11.2016 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

16.11.2016 9:53, Nikolay Grebennikov:

15.11.2016 19:22, Alex Dumchus:

15.11.2016 14:52, Vladimir Bobow:

14.11.2016 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.11.2016 13:04, Svetlana Shchavelina:

14.11.2016 11:35, Evgeny Slobodskoy:

14.11.2016 11:14, Irina Nikulina:

14.11.2016 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.11.2016 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.11.2016 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.11.2016 10:51, Evgeny Slobodskoy:

14.11.2016 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.11.2016 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ryan Brookes Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.11.2016 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chlorophorus / Tentatively identified Chlorophorus jucundus / Confidently identified.

14.11.2016 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.11.2016 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.11.2016 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.11.2016 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.11.2016 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.11.2016 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chlorophorus.

14.11.2016 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Catacanthus incarnatus.

14.11.2016 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mylabris pustulata.

13.11.2016 14:48, Shamil Murtazin:

13.11.2016 13:23, Evgeny Komarov:

13.11.2016 13:07, Evgeny Komarov:

13.11.2016 12:47, Evgeny Komarov:

13.11.2016 11:50, Peter Khramov:

12.11.2016 15:46, Shamil Murtazin:

interesting coloration =)

12.11.2016 14:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calamosternus granarius Ammoecius brevis.

12.11.2016 14:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calamosternus granarius Ammoecius brevis.

12.11.2016 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Desmobathrinae.

12.11.2016 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

John Moore Ryan Brookes.

12.11.2016 12:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Traminda mundissima Geometridae.

12.11.2016 12:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

12.11.2016 12:39, Ryan Brookes:

Hello John, this beautiful moth is certainly not Traminda mundissima. It belongs to the subfamily Desmobathrinae. However, I'm not very sure about the genus.

Regards,

Ryan

12.11.2016 10:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Eudolus quadriguttatus Planolinus vittatus.

10.11.2016 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Victor Titov.

10.11.2016 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Victor Titov.

09.11.2016 16:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Epholca arenosa / Yuri Semejkin.

09.11.2016 16:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Epholca arenosa (BUTLER, 1878)

09.11.2016 5:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Reduviidae Epidaus.

09.11.2016 5:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Reduviidae Reduviinae.

09.11.2016 4:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoptera / Confidently identified / Andrei Humala.

09.11.2016 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pompilidae / Confidently identified / Andrei Humala.

09.11.2016 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pompilidae / Confidently identified / Andrei Humala.

09.11.2016 4:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asilidae / Confidently identified / Andrei Humala.

09.11.2016 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asilidae / Confidently identified / Andrei Humala.

09.11.2016 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asilidae / Confidently identified / Andrei Humala.

09.11.2016 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asilidae / Confidently identified / Andrei Humala.

09.11.2016 4:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

09.11.2016 1:20, Andrei Humala:

09.11.2016 1:19, Andrei Humala:

09.11.2016 1:16, Andrei Humala:

09.11.2016 1:13, Andrei Humala:

09.11.2016 1:12, Andrei Humala:

Pompilidae

09.11.2016 1:11, Andrei Humala:

09.11.2016 1:10, Andrei Humala:

09.11.2016 1:08, Andrei Humala:

08.11.2016 14:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Eucarterus sparsutus Oedesis caucasicus.

07.11.2016 20:45, Ivan Tislenko:

Camptopus lateralis

07.11.2016 18:17, Alex ntizvestniy:

07.11.2016 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

07.11.2016 16:44, Alex ntizvestniy:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/tjd6c2k3t8atrmd/IMG_4364.jpg?dl=0

07.11.2016 16:43, Alex ntizvestniy:

07.11.2016 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

07.11.2016 12:07, Shamil Murtazin:

07.11.2016 11:24, Ryan Brookes:

Acropteris iphiata (Guenée, 1857)
http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/21517

07.11.2016 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

07.11.2016 10:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae Oligia strigilis.

07.11.2016 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae Anarta trifolii.

07.11.2016 9:14, Ryan Brookes:

Family: Erebidae
Subfamily: Herminiinae

07.11.2016 8:40, Ryan Brookes: This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2016 21:57, Alex Lender:

Oligia strigilis?

06.11.2016 21:57, Alex Lender:

Anarta trifolii?

06.11.2016 16:19, Andrei Humala:

06.11.2016 15:15, Shamil Murtazin:

06.11.2016 14:27, Andrei Humala:

06.11.2016 14:19, Andrei Humala:

06.11.2016 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.11.2016 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Sergeyy Tjabut Oulema melanopus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.11.2016 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.11.2016 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Sergeyy Tjabut Dinoptera collaris / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.11.2016 20:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.11.2016 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hamadryas februa.

05.11.2016 20:28, Andrei Humala:

05.11.2016 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.11.2016 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Gelis areator / Tentatively identified / Andrei Humala.

05.11.2016 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.11.2016 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.11.2016 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Mesochorinae / Andrei Humala.

05.11.2016 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Mesochorinae / Andrei Humala.

05.11.2016 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ichneumonidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Mesochorinae / Andrei Humala.

05.11.2016 17:59, Andrei Humala:

05.11.2016 17:58, Andrei Humala:

05.11.2016 17:56, Andrei Humala:

05.11.2016 17:55, Andrei Humala:

05.11.2016 17:55, Andrei Humala:

05.11.2016 17:54, Andrei Humala:

05.11.2016 17:52, Andrei Humala:

05.11.2016 0:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Adrisa.

05.11.2016 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Rhiginia cruciata Ectrichodiinae.

05.11.2016 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Rhiginia cruciata Ectrichodiinae.

04.11.2016 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.11.2016 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.11.2016 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

04.11.2016 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.11.2016 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #60449 group.

04.11.2016 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

04.11.2016 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syrphidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2016 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syrphidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2016 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2016 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris kurentzovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.11.2016 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.11.2016 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.11.2016 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alex Dumchus.

04.11.2016 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2016 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.11.2016 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2016 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.11.2016 6:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Priassus spiniger.

03.11.2016 6:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Halyomorpha.

02.11.2016 20:23, Evgeny Komarov:

02.11.2016 20:16, Evgeny Komarov:

02.11.2016 15:06, Ivan Tislenko:

02.11.2016 14:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Ok !

02.11.2016 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

02.11.2016 12:11, Yuri Semejkin:

02.11.2016 9:35, Evgeny Komarov:

02.11.2016 9:30, Evgeny Komarov:

02.11.2016 7:20, Shamil Murtazin:

02.11.2016 6:52, Evgeny Komarov:

02.11.2016 6:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Amara ingenua / Tentatively identified / Ivan Tislenko Amara / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

02.11.2016 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Odonata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.11.2016 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Geotrupes stercorarius / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.11.2016 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

01.11.2016 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Laothoe populi / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.11.2016 13:24, Irina Nikulina:

Since there are 2 photos with my definition on the site, I think it is necessary to explain why out of 5 local species of Phengaris I identified it as kurentzovi. 2 species - arionides and cyanecula - fall off immediately, completely different underside, in kurentzovi and teleius they are about the same distance from the root. It turns out that the choice is between the latter.
Illustrations:
http://szmn.sbras.ru/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Maculinea_kurentzovi.htm#kurentzoviargentif (for Primorye Maculinea kurentzovi kurentzovi)
http://www.nabistory.co.kr/nabi-htm/254.htm and a very good drawing for Phengaris kurentzovi in the article
by S.Y. Gordeev, A.V. Filippov. New findings of diurnal Lepidoptera (Lepidoptera, Diurna) on the territory of Western Transbaikalia. (Bulletin of the Buryat State University.Issue # 4-1 / 2014)

01.11.2016 13:12, Irina Nikulina:

Phengaris kurentzovi

01.11.2016 11:00, Irina Nikulina:

01.11.2016 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Boloria selene / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.11.2016 10:38, Yuri Semejkin:

01.11.2016 10:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.11.2016 10:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irina Nikulina Eugnosta dives / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.11.2016 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irina Nikulina Eugnosta dives / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.11.2016 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irina Nikulina Eugnosta dives / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.11.2016 0:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Eusthenes brinae.

01.11.2016 0:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Physopelta cincticollis.

01.11.2016 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Physopelta gutta.

01.11.2016 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nezara viridula Piezodorus hybneri.

31.10.2016 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

31.10.2016 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris kurentzovi / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.10.2016 17:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupido argiades / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.10.2016 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.10.2016 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Sergeyy Tjabut Melitaea diamina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2016 17:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

31.10.2016 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2016 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha arcania / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.10.2016 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

31.10.2016 9:08, Boris Georgi:

31.10.2016 9:08, Boris Georgi: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2016 20:11, Irina Nikulina:

Glaucopsyche lycormas

30.10.2016 16:52, Yuri Semejkin:

30.10.2016 16:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Cupido argiades (Pallas, 1771)

29.10.2016 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

29.10.2016 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

29.10.2016 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Antilochus coqueberti Leptocoris.

29.10.2016 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Antilochus coqueberti Leptocoris.

29.10.2016 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Aiolocaria hexaspilota / Ivan Tislenko.

28.10.2016 20:37, Ivan Tislenko:

28.10.2016 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aphrophoridae / Confidently identified Aphrophora major / Tentatively identified.

28.10.2016 10:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

And this is also most likely ♂ Ancylolomia tentaculella

28.10.2016 10:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is probably Ancylolomia tentaculella, ♂

28.10.2016 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

28.10.2016 7:26, Yuri Semejkin:

28.10.2016 6:42, Alex Dumchus:

27.10.2016 23:07, Shamil Murtazin:

27.10.2016 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

27.10.2016 19:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

27.10.2016 19:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2016 19:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2016 19:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2016 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2016 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Polyommatus amandus / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2016 16:12, Alex Dumchus:

25.10.2016 13:04, Yuri Semejkin:

25.10.2016 8:49, Ivan Pristrem:

25.10.2016 7:03, Yuri Semejkin:

24.10.2016 16:36, Irina Nikulina:

24.10.2016 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.10.2016 15:49, Irina Nikulina:

24.10.2016 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.10.2016 14:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irina Nikulina Exapate congelatella / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.10.2016 14:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Irina Nikulina Exapate congelatella / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.10.2016 14:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Irina Nikulina Exapate congelatella / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2016 12:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Pieris brassicae / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2016 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vanessa / Irek Yusupov Vanessa cardui / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2016 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irek Yusupov Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2016 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vanessa Vanessa cardui.

23.10.2016 9:43, Irek Yusupov:

23.10.2016 0:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Pieris brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758)

23.10.2016 0:25, Yuri Semejkin:

22.10.2016 23:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)

22.10.2016 23:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)

21.10.2016 23:42, Shamil Murtazin:

21.10.2016 14:16, Miran Cvenkel:

I don't know, my second post here and no contence, doh one can see it (part of it) at threads list ...

21.10.2016 14:13, Miran Cvenkel:

duplicate by Species name & author
I guess these records shold be merged into single record, doh they differ sometimes in other data than Species name & author

put belov indexes into following link pattern: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/index

Anisocyrta alpinicolavan","570269,1014721"
Apanteles gielisi","559228,1014742"
Apronopa haeselbarthivan","1014718,574719"
Aspilota louiseaevan","1014560,570672"

21.10.2016 11:02, Irina Nikulina:

21.10.2016 1:30, Peter Khramov:

20.10.2016 2:33, Miran Cvenkel:

For some reason message did not stick, anyway:

Species name(s)

Saturnia (Eudia) pavonia (Linnaeus, 1758) = Eudia pavonia (Linnaeus, 1758) = Phalaena pavonia Linnaeus, 1758 = minor Linnaeus, 1758 = Bombyx carpini Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775 = alpina Favre, 1897 = borealis Rangnow, 1935 = lapponica Lingonblad, 1936 = lappmarchica Bryk, 1948.

How to read "= minor"
as Phalaena minor ?

20.10.2016 2:30, Miran Cvenkel:

http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/2812

Species name(s)

Saturnia (Eudia) pavonia (Linnaeus, 1758) = Eudia pavonia (Linnaeus, 1758) = Phalaena pavonia Linnaeus, 1758 = minor Linnaeus, 1758 = Bombyx carpini Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775 = alpina Favre, 1897 = borealis Rangnow, 1935 = lapponica Lingonblad, 1936 = lappmarchica Bryk, 1948.

How to read "1758 = minor"
as Phalaena minor
or Saturnia minor
or .... ?

18.10.2016 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

18.10.2016 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.10.2016 16:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

18.10.2016 15:37, Irina Nikulina:

18.10.2016 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

18.10.2016 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cossus cossus / Confidently identified Acossus terebra / Tentatively identified.

18.10.2016 4:43, Yuri Semejkin:

17.10.2016 23:46, Irina Nikulina:

http://www.jpmoth.org/Gelechiidae/Dichomeridinae/Dichomeris_okadai.html
http://photozou.jp/photo/show/1433095/199103679

17.10.2016 23:44, Irina Nikulina:

17.10.2016 23:26, Irina Nikulina:

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/51_Tortricidae/5001%20Tortricinae/500135_Acleris/50013557_Acleris_conchyloides_0225/Acleris_conchyloides.htm http://photozou.jp/photo/show/1433095/229204691

17.10.2016 22:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2016 22:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Carabus granulatus / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

17.10.2016 22:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Carabus granulatus / Evgeny Komarov.

17.10.2016 15:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Oxyporus procerus Kraatz, 1879 ?

17.10.2016 12:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

17.10.2016 12:43, Yuri Semejkin:

17.10.2016 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

17.10.2016 12:25, Yuri Semejkin:

17.10.2016 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.10.2016 21:30, Evgeny Komarov:

15.10.2016 21:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Dermestidae / Evgeny Komarov.

15.10.2016 11:34, Peter Khramov:

14.10.2016 20:01, Irina Nikulina:

14.10.2016 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.10.2016 16:24, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Noctuidae.

14.10.2016 9:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zygaena Zygaena lonicerae.

14.10.2016 8:54, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

14.10.2016 8:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aplocera / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin Aplocera plagiata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.10.2016 8:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

13.10.2016 23:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Zygaena lonicerae?

13.10.2016 23:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Acrida ungarica?

13.10.2016 23:13, Irina Nikulina:

13.10.2016 17:45, Irina Nikulina:

13.10.2016 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

13.10.2016 11:36, Irina Nikulina:

13.10.2016 10:54, Yuri Semejkin:

13.10.2016 10:39, Yuri Semejkin:

For now, I took note of the information.

13.10.2016 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

13.10.2016 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips nigricaudanus / Imago Archips dichotomus / Male.

13.10.2016 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, you're right, but the conclusions are wrong, all the differences you have indicated, there are differences between ♂ and ♀. Some species of this genus have highly developed sexual dimorphism. . In general, this specimen fits the species well, but is inaccurate due to lack of knowledge about number of species of this genus from Primorye. :)

13.10.2016 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

The leaf is intact, the caterpillar could get onto it from any plant. Forage plant is under big question.

13.10.2016 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Archips dichotomus / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.10.2016 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Archips dichotomus / Irina Nikulina.

13.10.2016 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Robot Archips dichotomus / Tentatively identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

13.10.2016 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Robot Archips dichotomus / Female / Irina Nikulina.

13.10.2016 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Robot Archips dichotomus / Tentatively identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

13.10.2016 1:50, Yuri Semejkin:

I'm not sure. If you compare it with http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/60346, there are differences. First of all, if you look at this picture, the general appearance catches your eye - the butterfly is more massive, wide. And secondly, the apex of the wings is greatly expanded, specifically curved, which is a characteristic feature for some species.

13.10.2016 0:54, Irina Nikulina:

I think there is a female here Archips dichotomus http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl ?Archips_Dichotoma

13.10.2016 0:42, Irina Nikulina:

There was a reason to doubt the accuracy of the identification. Please move to Archips dichotomus. Explanations here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/60346

13.10.2016 0:39, Irina Nikulina:

13.10.2016 0:36, Irina Nikulina:

12.10.2016 19:57, Shamil Murtazin:

12.10.2016 19:46, Vladimir Bryukhov:

11.10.2016 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.10.2016 0:50, Shamil Murtazin:

11.10.2016 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.10.2016 21:33, Shamil Murtazin:



10.10.2016 12:41, Shamil Murtazin:

09.10.2016 20:23, Peter Khramov:

09.10.2016 13:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2016 13:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2016 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Imago / Jack Sammerbey Stenurella melanura / Female / Boris Georgi.

09.10.2016 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Jack Sammerbey Oedemeridae / Boris Georgi.

09.10.2016 8:49, Boris Georgi:

Oedemeridae

09.10.2016 8:47, Boris Georgi:

08.10.2016 23:20, Peter Khramov:

08.10.2016 12:28, Evgeny Komarov:

07.10.2016 22:53, Shamil Murtazin:

07.10.2016 22:49, Shamil Murtazin:

07.10.2016 21:45, Peter Khramov:

07.10.2016 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

07.10.2016 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Childrena childreni / Alex Dumchus.

07.10.2016 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Childrena childreni / Alex Dumchus.

06.10.2016 20:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

06.10.2016 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Junonia lemonias lemonias / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.10.2016 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Junonia lemonias lemonias / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.10.2016 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Catopsilia pomona / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.10.2016 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Svetlana Shchavelina Fedor Ovechkin.

06.10.2016 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Pelopidas / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.10.2016 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Appias olferna / Female.

06.10.2016 1:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

Pelopidas

06.10.2016 1:19, Fedor Ovechkin:

Catopsilia pomona.

06.10.2016 1:11, Fedor Ovechkin:

Junonia lemonias lemonias.

06.10.2016 1:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Appias olferna olferna, ♀.

04.10.2016 7:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2016 14:12, Peter Khramov:

02.10.2016 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Lexias pardalis / Male / Alex Dumchus.

02.10.2016 6:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

01.10.2016 9:34, Yuri Semejkin:

01.10.2016 9:13, Artem Strizhov:

01.10.2016 7:17, Alex Dumchus:

Appias sp.

01.10.2016 7:16, Alex Dumchus:

01.10.2016 7:10, Alex Dumchus:

29.09.2016 10:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxyporus procerus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

29.09.2016 10:12, Yuri Semejkin:

28.09.2016 20:07, Shamil Murtazin:

28.09.2016 16:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Hypolimnas bolina / Alex Dumchus.

28.09.2016 16:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Lexias dirtea / Female / Alex Dumchus.

28.09.2016 16:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Hypolimnas bolina / Male / Alex Dumchus.

28.09.2016 16:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Elymnias / Alex Dumchus.

28.09.2016 16:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helicoverpa armigera / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

28.09.2016 16:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helicoverpa armigera / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

28.09.2016 16:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helicoverpa armigera / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

28.09.2016 12:40, Alex Dumchus:

Elymnias sp

28.09.2016 12:37, Alex Dumchus:

28.09.2016 12:36, Alex Dumchus:

28.09.2016 12:31, Alex Dumchus:

Hypolimnas bolina

28.09.2016 11:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pterophorus pentadactyla / Evgeny Komarov.

27.09.2016 19:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chlaenius / Confidently identified / Imago Chlaenius tetragonoderus / Tentatively identified / Female.

27.09.2016 7:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Neptis alwina / Yuri Semejkin Neptis philyroides / Irina Nikulina.

26.09.2016 19:24, Irina Nikulina:

This is not alwina, I uploaded alwina's underside (#60179) You can see alwina here http://catocala.narod.ru/nym10.html. And at the photo Neptis philyroides

26.09.2016 19:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Neptis philyra / Alex Dumchus Neptis philyroides / Irina Nikulina.

26.09.2016 17:49, Irina Nikulina:

This is Neptis philyroides (underside #36978)

25.09.2016 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

25.09.2016 6:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.09.2016 12:19, Peter Khramov:

24.09.2016 0:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Meloe / Vasiliy Feoktistov Meloe violaceus / Evgeny Komarov.

23.09.2016 23:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Meloidae / Ivan Pristrem Alosimus syriacus / Evgeny Komarov.

23.09.2016 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.09.2016 8:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lithophane furcifera / Evgeny Komarov Lithophane ornitopus / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2016 19:56, Evgeny Komarov:

22.09.2016 11:26, Ivan Tislenko:

Harmonia axyridis

22.09.2016 11:26, Ivan Tislenko:

Harmonia axyridis

22.09.2016 7:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mantis religiosa / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.09.2016 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.09.2016 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Mesosa myops / Boris Georgi.

21.09.2016 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Thecla betulae / Yuri Semejkin.

21.09.2016 14:38, Boris Georgi:

Mesosa myops

21.09.2016 14:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Thecla betulae (Linnaeus, 1758)

20.09.2016 5:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Zabrus / Boris Georgi Zabrus aurichalceus / Evgeny Komarov.

19.09.2016 18:42, Boris Georgi:

19.09.2016 8:34, Shamil Murtazin:

19.09.2016 7:47, Evgeny Komarov:

18.09.2016 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

18.09.2016 19:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Ypsolopha amoenella / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2016 19:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Ypsolopha amoenella / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2016 19:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Arctiidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Spilosoma lutea / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2016 16:52, Irina Nikulina:

Ypsolopha amoenella

18.09.2016 16:50, Irina Nikulina:

Spilosoma lutea

18.09.2016 16:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vlad Proklov.

18.09.2016 16:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

18.09.2016 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vlad Proklov.

18.09.2016 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

18.09.2016 15:46, Peter Khramov:

18.09.2016 12:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus granulatus / Zoran Bozovic Carabus clathratus / Evgeny Komarov.

17.09.2016 17:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Bromius obscurus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.09.2016 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemithea aestivaria / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

17.09.2016 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.09.2016 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.09.2016 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / .

17.09.2016 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.09.2016 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.09.2016 4:25, Yuri Semejkin:

17.09.2016 1:47, Yuri Semejkin:

16.09.2016 22:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 22:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 19:19, Evgeny Komarov:

16.09.2016 15:06, Yuri Semejkin:

16.09.2016 14:13, Yuri Semejkin:

16.09.2016 14:08, Evgeny Komarov:

16.09.2016 13:58, Yuri Semejkin:

16.09.2016 13:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 13:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 13:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2016 13:42, Evgeny Komarov:

16.09.2016 13:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Pseudoophonus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.09.2016 13:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Pseudoophonus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.09.2016 13:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Harmonia axyridis / Ivan Tislenko.

16.09.2016 13:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Harmonia axyridis / Ivan Tislenko.

16.09.2016 12:43, Ivan Tislenko:

Harmonia axyridis

16.09.2016 12:42, Ivan Tislenko:

Harmonia axyridis

16.09.2016 10:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Aplocera.

16.09.2016 10:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Aplocera.

16.09.2016 10:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Ennomos.

16.09.2016 10:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Ennomos.

15.09.2016 22:21, Shamil Murtazin:

15.09.2016 22:20, Irina Nikulina:

15.09.2016 18:54, Ivan Pristrem:

15.09.2016 16:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago / Dmitry Vtorushin Male / Evgeny Komarov.

15.09.2016 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithophane furcifera / Evgeny Komarov Lithophane ornitopus / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.09.2016 14:19, Evgeny Komarov:

15.09.2016 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.09.2016 12:24, Evgeny Komarov:

15.09.2016 10:50, Evgeny Komarov:

14.09.2016 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.09.2016 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebus / Tentatively identified / Olga Averyanova.

14.09.2016 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Not identified.

14.09.2016 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gyrohypnus.

14.09.2016 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lathrobium.

14.09.2016 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ocypus.

14.09.2016 14:47, Alexander Belousov:

14.09.2016 12:51, Waleri Lebedeva:

14.09.2016 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2016 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

13.09.2016 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Deilephila elpenor / Confidently identified / Larva / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2016 13:48, Peter Khramov:

13.09.2016 12:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

13.09.2016 10:56, Yuri Semejkin:

13.09.2016 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

13.09.2016 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

12.09.2016 22:32, Evgeny Komarov:

12.09.2016 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Paratorna cuprescens.

12.09.2016 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

12.09.2016 21:49, Evgeny Komarov:

12.09.2016 15:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

12.09.2016 13:50, Yuri Semejkin:

12.09.2016 12:52, Peter Khramov:

12.09.2016 6:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

11.09.2016 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

11.09.2016 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.09.2016 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

11.09.2016 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Automeris liberia Leucanella nyctimene.

11.09.2016 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

11.09.2016 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pierinae / Yuri Semejkin Pontia edusa / Alexander Belousov.

11.09.2016 21:24, Shamil Murtazin:

11.09.2016 19:45, Peter Khramov:

11.09.2016 13:30, Shamil Murtazin:

11.09.2016 8:36, Alexander Belousov:

Pontia edusa (Fabricius, 1777)

11.09.2016 3:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Pontia callidice (Hubner, 1800) ?

11.09.2016 1:37, Peter Khramov:

10.09.2016 23:31, Shamil Murtazin:

10.09.2016 23:04, Peter Khramov:

10.09.2016 16:29, Shamil Murtazin:

10.09.2016 15:44, Igor Ivannikov:

Pseudodirphia obliqua Bouvier,1924.

10.09.2016 13:43, Igor Ivannikov:

10.09.2016 13:20, Peter Khramov:

10.09.2016 9:10, Yuri Semejkin:

10.09.2016 7:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Goliathus orientalis / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Goliathus goliatus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.09.2016 7:21, Evgeny Komarov:

10.09.2016 7:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Plusiinae / Yuri Semejkin Macdunnoughia confusa / Evgeny Komarov.

10.09.2016 4:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.09.2016 4:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.09.2016 4:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.09.2016 19:58, Boris Georgi:

09.09.2016 13:32, Irina Nikulina:

09.09.2016 8:39, Boris Georgi:

09.09.2016 8:12, Boris Georgi:

09.09.2016 8:07, Boris Georgi:

09.09.2016 8:01, Boris Georgi:

08.09.2016 10:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.09.2016 10:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.09.2016 10:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.09.2016 10:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.09.2016 10:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Evgeny Komarov.

08.09.2016 9:54, Yuri Semejkin:

08.09.2016 6:49, Evgeny Komarov:

07.09.2016 15:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

07.09.2016 15:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

07.09.2016 15:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

07.09.2016 15:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Harpalus froelichii / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

07.09.2016 15:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus / Confidently identified Harpalus froelichii / Tentatively identified.

07.09.2016 15:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus / Yuri Semejkin Harpalus froelichii / Evgeny Komarov.

07.09.2016 8:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dendrolimus Dendrolimus superans.

07.09.2016 8:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dendrolimus Dendrolimus superans.

07.09.2016 1:30, Irina Nikulina:

06.09.2016 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.09.2016 6:49, Yuri Semejkin:

05.09.2016 16:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Oberea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Oberea morio / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2016 13:03, Yuri Semejkin:

05.09.2016 12:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

05.09.2016 12:50, Evgeny Komarov:

05.09.2016 12:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

05.09.2016 12:48, Yuri Semejkin:

05.09.2016 11:49, Evgeny Komarov:

05.09.2016 11:48, Evgeny Komarov:

05.09.2016 11:35, Evgeny Komarov:

05.09.2016 11:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lebia humeralis Lebia scapularis.

05.09.2016 11:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lebia humeralis Lebia scapularis.

05.09.2016 11:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lebia humeralis Lebia scapularis.

05.09.2016 7:26, Yuri Semejkin:

05.09.2016 7:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

05.09.2016 6:57, Yuri Semejkin:

05.09.2016 6:46, Evgeny Komarov:

05.09.2016 6:46, Yuri Semejkin:

05.09.2016 6:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Harpalus / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2016 6:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Harpalus / Evgeny Komarov.

05.09.2016 1:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Timandra comptaria Walker, [1863]

04.09.2016 22:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Narosoideus flavidorsalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.09.2016 22:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Narosoideus flavidorsalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.09.2016 22:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phrixolepia sericea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.09.2016 22:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phrixolepia sericea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.09.2016 21:51, Irina Nikulina:

Narosoideus flavidorsalis

04.09.2016 21:51, Irina Nikulina:

Narosoideus flavidorsalis

04.09.2016 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Phrixolepia sericea

04.09.2016 21:45, Irina Nikulina:

Phrixolepia sericea

04.09.2016 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

04.09.2016 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Aethes rubigana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.09.2016 8:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gamelia Gamelia amietti.

04.09.2016 8:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gamelia Gamelia amietti.

03.09.2016 19:58, Igor Ivannikov:

Gamelia amietti Brechlin & Meister, 2012.

03.09.2016 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2016 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2016 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2016 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2016 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2016 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, Evgeniy. Thank you ))
I put things in order.

03.09.2016 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lytta vesicatoria Lytta togata.

03.09.2016 10:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

03.09.2016 10:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

03.09.2016 10:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

03.09.2016 10:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

03.09.2016 10:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

03.09.2016 8:22, Evgeny Komarov:

03.09.2016 8:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Why not? Here they are https://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/pdf/shapovalov_2016_taxonomy_genus_lytta_and_new_species.pdf and this taxon has been in the species rang for a thousand years - we just didn’t get around to it.

02.09.2016 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It seems like this beetle is now no longer a subspecies, but a completely independent species Lytta (s.str.) togata Fischer von Waldheim, 1844 http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/lyttogas .htm
And people say the same thing.....
The fact is that today I added such a beetle to my collection and, in my opinion, it differs quite significantly from the nominative, even visually.
We need to deal with this (look for the reason). Has anyone ever come across this kind of data?

02.09.2016 17:33, Evgeny Komarov:

02.09.2016 15:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

02.09.2016 12:14, Yuri Semejkin:

02.09.2016 11:27, Evgeny Komarov:

02.09.2016 11:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Maladera renardi / Tentatively identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

02.09.2016 11:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.09.2016 11:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Maladera renardi / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

02.09.2016 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cossus Cossus cossus.

02.09.2016 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cossus Cossus cossus.

02.09.2016 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cossus Cossus orientalis.

02.09.2016 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cossus Cossus orientalis.

02.09.2016 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cossus Cossus orientalis.

01.09.2016 23:55, Irina Nikulina:

01.09.2016 23:48, Irina Nikulina:

01.09.2016 23:47, Irina Nikulina:

Cossus orientalis Gaede, 1929

01.09.2016 23:47, Irina Nikulina:

Cossus cossus

01.09.2016 23:46, Irina Nikulina:

Cossus cossus

01.09.2016 23:45, Irina Nikulina:

Cossus orientalis Gaede, 1929

01.09.2016 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

01.09.2016 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Irina Nikulina.

01.09.2016 15:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

01.09.2016 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oreta pulchripes Oreta paki.

01.09.2016 15:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oreta pulchripes Oreta paki.

01.09.2016 15:21, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, it's also paki

01.09.2016 15:20, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, Sasha, it is, I wrote about it in the first post about the article.

01.09.2016 15:19, Irina Nikulina:

01.09.2016 13:10, Yuri Semejkin:

01.09.2016 13:02, Yuri Semejkin:

01.09.2016 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Megalycinia strictaria.

01.09.2016 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Horisme tersata / Irina Nikulina.

01.09.2016 11:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Oreta paki?

01.09.2016 11:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Is this also an Oreta paki?

01.09.2016 11:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oreta pulchripes Oreta paki.

01.09.2016 11:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oreta pulchripes Oreta paki.

01.09.2016 11:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oreta pulchripes Oreta paki.

01.09.2016 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, this article was published after the release of the catalog or simultaneously with it, so the species was not included. Why Oreta turpis Butler, 1877, is not on the list is another question.

01.09.2016 10:43, Evgeny Komarov:

01.09.2016 10:39, Evgeny Komarov:

01.09.2016 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

01.09.2016 0:14, Irina Nikulina:

31.08.2016 22:33, Irina Nikulina:

31.08.2016 22:32, Irina Nikulina:

Horisme tersata

31.08.2016 21:50, Irina Nikulina:

31.08.2016 18:09, Yuri Semejkin:

31.08.2016 17:27, Irina Nikulina:

31.08.2016 16:44, Evgeny Komarov:

31.08.2016 16:16, Irina Nikulina:

31.08.2016 15:48, Peter Khramov:

31.08.2016 15:17, Yuri Semejkin:

31.08.2016 14:51, Evgeny Komarov:

31.08.2016 14:31, Yuri Semejkin:

31.08.2016 13:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877 ?

31.08.2016 13:44, Evgeny Komarov:

31.08.2016 13:10, Yuri Semejkin:

31.08.2016 9:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dolbina tancrei / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov Kentrochrysalis streckeri / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

31.08.2016 6:11, Yuri Semejkin:

>>>>

31.08.2016 5:50, Yuri Semejkin:

31.08.2016 5:48, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

31.08.2016 5:48, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

31.08.2016 5:46, Yuri Semejkin:

31.08.2016 1:24, Irina Nikulina:

>>>>

30.08.2016 21:41, Irina Nikulina:

Evgeny, over the past 2 years there are 5 photos of different Timandra that I haven't posted yet, because I wouldn’t risk defining anything other than recompta for 40th Russia region at the moment.May be you are right and this is dichela in this photo. But not because of the shape of the sling. Last fall, I was trying to figure it out. I copied more than 25 images of Timandra from the network (all 5 species living in Primorye), including these 2 from Molbiol. And the more I look and compare, the clearer it becomes that it is like fortune-telling and and there are unlikely to be very specific signs. For example, Timandra apicirosea. I think there may be mistakes on our website. I sent my pictures to Belyaev, but, unfortunately, I have not received any response yet. Waiting:)

30.08.2016 21:17, Vadim Strykalo: This species is identified correctly.

30.08.2016 20:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Here is my specimen from Anisimovka http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/59680 . I tend to dichela, not taking into account the "more bold burgundy line", but it seems to me that the "weak" angle of this line on the rear wings is more significant (compared with http://molbiol.ru/forums/uploads/a003/b085/post-26523-1355326687.jpg ). In the same place, just above paralis -
http://molbiol.ru/forums/uploads/a003/b085/post-26523-1355326319.jpg

30.08.2016 20:27, Irina Nikulina:

30.08.2016 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.08.2016 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

30.08.2016 18:41, Evgeny Komarov:

30.08.2016 18:39, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

30.08.2016 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

30.08.2016 15:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Comostola subtiliaria / Yuri Semejkin.

30.08.2016 15:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Comostola subtiliaria / Yuri Semejkin.

30.08.2016 15:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Comostola subtiliaria / Yuri Semejkin.

30.08.2016 15:23, Yuri Semejkin:

30.08.2016 13:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

30.08.2016 13:35, Evgeny Komarov:

30.08.2016 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

30.08.2016 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Svetlana Karaeva Vlad Proklov.

30.08.2016 13:26, Vadim Strykalo:

30.08.2016 13:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia trabealis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

30.08.2016 12:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

30.08.2016 4:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene! Thank you for making things clear!

29.08.2016 19:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, now everything is clear - everything is visible in the second picture! The matter is settled!

29.08.2016 19:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

29.08.2016 16:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene! I usually don't identify beetles. I send them to A. Lobanov for example. Here is the top and bottom http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/seme2013.htm
The species is not indicated on the website. I don’t remember where the definition of the species came from now. Evgeniy, follow the link, maybe the 2 pictures will clarify something. Of course, it's possible to try to get through the mail and try to find the author of the definition, but I would rather not to to do that.

29.08.2016 15:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri! Are there any basis for accurately identifying this specimen? I don't see in the picture any obvious characteristics that allow to distinguish it from 3-4 relative specimens.

29.08.2016 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oxytenis Oxytenis naemia.

29.08.2016 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oxytenis Oxytenis naemia.

29.08.2016 9:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lycidae / Yuri Semejkin Lycostomus porphyrophorus / Evgeny Komarov.

29.08.2016 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.08.2016 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.08.2016 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apeira syringaria / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

29.08.2016 8:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apeira syringaria / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

29.08.2016 6:53, Evgeny Komarov:

29.08.2016 2:20, Yuri Semejkin:

28.08.2016 11:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthosoma Acanthosoma labiduroides.

28.08.2016 11:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acanthosoma Acanthosoma labiduroides.

27.08.2016 19:19, Igor Ivannikov:

Oxytenis naemia Druce,1906.

27.08.2016 12:13, Yuri Semejkin:

27.08.2016 9:41, Evgeny Komarov:

27.08.2016 9:24, Evgeny Komarov:

27.08.2016 9:16, Evgeny Komarov:

27.08.2016 0:50, Yuri Semejkin:

27.08.2016 0:07, Evgeny Komarov:

26.08.2016 23:40, Evgeny Komarov:

26.08.2016 23:36, Evgeny Komarov:

26.08.2016 22:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.08.2016 22:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Halyzia sedecimguttata / Irina Nikulina Vibidia duodecimguttata / Ivan Tislenko.

26.08.2016 22:18, Evgeny Komarov:

26.08.2016 22:15, Evgeny Komarov:

26.08.2016 22:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Halyzia sedecimguttata / Evgeny Komarov Vibidia duodecimguttata / Ivan Tislenko.

26.08.2016 21:49, Ivan Tislenko:

26.08.2016 21:40, Evgeny Komarov:

26.08.2016 21:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nicrophorus humator / Tentatively identified Nicrophorus concolor / Confidently identified.

26.08.2016 20:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

26.08.2016 20:19, Evgeny Komarov:

26.08.2016 18:18, Olga Averyanova:

правда получилось в очень плохом качестве, к сожалению, не могу удалить фото - видимо, из за комментариев

26.08.2016 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UP
Peter, the issue has been in place for more than a month.
Pull the photo out into the light of day from the additional gallery at last. On the species page, on the right, there are no photos right now (

26.08.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphrophoridae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

26.08.2016 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Tortricidae / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.08.2016 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Psychidae.

26.08.2016 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Psychidae.

26.08.2016 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Alexandr Zhakov.

26.08.2016 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Alexandr Zhakov.

26.08.2016 13:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Acosmetia chinensis / Irina Nikulina.

26.08.2016 11:40, Evgeny Komarov:

So I didn't post all the captured species :) Why upload if there are already a dozen good pictures from the same places on the website. But you can estimate approximately of course. In general, Noctuoidea has 135 species, and specifically Noctuidae - 62. This year I have not posted practically any of them.

26.08.2016 11:04, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, there is no need to count:) Select Gallery - further in the selection parameters choose Noctuidae, photographer and select Primorsky Krai as Location. Here are the results and the photos. Very convenient:)

26.08.2016 10:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Of course not, Yuri! I didn't send him one picture at a time. plus external variability, plus I don't know very well myself :) It is necessary to calculate how many types of Noctuidae from Primorye I took a photo of. I know that I have illustrated 2099 species on the website so far, but how many of them are a Noctuidae...

26.08.2016 10:16, Irina Nikulina:

Acosmetia chinensis

26.08.2016 8:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Amphipyra schrenсkii / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.08.2016 8:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Deltote pygarga / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.08.2016 8:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

26.08.2016 8:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nolidae Hypenodes humidalis.

26.08.2016 1:46, Yuri Semejkin:

26.08.2016 1:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene! And one and a half hundred, is that so many species were shoot?

26.08.2016 1:03, Yuri Semejkin:

26.08.2016 0:59, Yuri Semejkin:

25.08.2016 22:45, Peter Khramov:

25.08.2016 22:11, Evgeny Komarov:

25.08.2016 22:08, Irina Nikulina:

25.08.2016 22:03, Peter Khramov:

25.08.2016 21:06, Evgeny Komarov:

25.08.2016 20:09, Evgeny Komarov:

25.08.2016 20:08, Evgeny Komarov:

25.08.2016 20:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Irina Nikulina.

25.08.2016 19:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Irina Nikulina.

25.08.2016 19:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euromoia subpulchra Euromoia mixta.

25.08.2016 19:57, Evgeny Komarov:

When I uploaded a one and a half hundred of Noctuidae for Matov, I was uncritical,and he just made a slip. I asked him once again.I'm correcting it now.

25.08.2016 19:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euromoia mixta Euromoia subpulchra.

25.08.2016 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

25.08.2016 17:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

25.08.2016 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

25.08.2016 16:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Nola sp ?

25.08.2016 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

25.08.2016 15:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Aphrophoridae sp.

25.08.2016 13:55, Evgeny Komarov:

25.08.2016 11:39, Irina Nikulina:

25.08.2016 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

25.08.2016 0:39, Irina Nikulina:

24.08.2016 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.08.2016 15:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

24.08.2016 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.08.2016 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thyas honesta?

24.08.2016 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Thyas / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.08.2016 12:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Erebus ephesperis?

24.08.2016 12:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Erebus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.08.2016 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Artena dotata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.08.2016 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Artena inversa / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.08.2016 12:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.08.2016 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Asota / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.08.2016 12:04, Ivan Tislenko:

24.08.2016 12:04, Ivan Tislenko:

24.08.2016 10:07, Vladimir Bryukhov:

24.08.2016 8:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypsopygia costalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.08.2016 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

23.08.2016 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

23.08.2016 11:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.08.2016 11:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.08.2016 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

I can not see anything.

23.08.2016 10:26, Olga Averyanova:

что-то не так?

23.08.2016 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

????

23.08.2016 9:35, Olga Averyanova: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2016 15:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Vladimir Bobow Eulithis testata / Yuri Semejkin.

22.08.2016 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.08.2016 15:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Eulithis testata (Linnaeus, 1761)

22.08.2016 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Geometridae.

22.08.2016 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae Angonyx testacea.

22.08.2016 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae Angonyx testacea.

22.08.2016 10:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Confidently identified Hippotion rosetta / Tentatively identified.

22.08.2016 10:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Confidently identified Hippotion rosetta / Tentatively identified.

22.08.2016 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae Nephele hespera.

22.08.2016 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae Nephele hespera.

21.08.2016 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Morpho didius / Peter Khramov Morpho anaxibia / Igor Ivannikov.

21.08.2016 20:13, Alex Dumchus:

I agree with Igor that this is anaxibia. The zigzag line characteristic of anaxibia is visible on the back light, and the dots are the same

21.08.2016 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Pergesa acteus / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Pergesa acteus / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elena Kenunen Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sphingidae / Elena Kenunen.

21.08.2016 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sphingidae / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:27, Alex Dumchus:

Pergesa acteus (Cramer, 1779)

21.08.2016 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Alex Dumchus.

21.08.2016 19:26, Alex Dumchus:

Nephele hespera (Fabricius, 1775)?

21.08.2016 19:23, Alex Dumchus:

Hippotion rosetta (Swinhoe, 1892)?

21.08.2016 19:12, Alex Dumchus:

Angonyx testacea (Walker, 1856)???

21.08.2016 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, here he specifically indicated the wingspan for a Moscow region female (53 mm.): http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42184
This year, July 12 (it's a little early for it here) I took another one. This one has a wingspan of 55 mm.
Quite a large beast:)
And the condition is perfect this year (it is unusual for representatives of the genus, they are usually ragged) ...
Unfortunately, I can't post anything now. My camera is dead, alas :(.

21.08.2016 18:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, I've already looked it too =) I'll post it soon.

21.08.2016 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Is this an assumption or a statement?

21.08.2016 16:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, Noctua tirrenica definitely can't be in Ufa. :)

21.08.2016 15:20, Shamil Murtazin:

And not spread one can be defined?.. I photographed it at night today. It's bigger than it looks in these photos:).

21.08.2016 15:17, Shamil Murtazin:

The photo is cool, everything else is not important =)

21.08.2016 14:07, Igor Ivannikov:

Morpho anaxibia.

21.08.2016 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Actias selene / Vitaly Gumenuk Actias luna / Igor Ivannikov.

21.08.2016 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Actias selene / Vitaly Gumenuk Actias luna / Igor Ivannikov.

21.08.2016 12:33, Igor Ivannikov:

Actias luna.

21.08.2016 12:32, Igor Ivannikov:

Actias luna.

21.08.2016 10:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Sasha, I have uploaded a description of both species here. Pay attention to the description of the hindwing.In cases where they are visible, there are no problems with species defining. I don’t understand about stigma, is it possible that both species may not have it? Or weakly expressed ? If so, I would like an explanation how to identify the species without seeing the hind wings. ...

21.08.2016 8:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yura, as for photos, I also agree with Ira, but in general there can be real confusion in photos with these species :)

21.08.2016 2:55, Yuri Semejkin:

>>>>

20.08.2016 14:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

A reniform stigma, in my opinion, is a good difference. You can't tell that from Kononenko's book. There, only one out of five specimens of these two species has it clearly visible. You're probably right, but I'm not sure.

20.08.2016 13:50, Irina Nikulina:

Of course, we will wait for the opinions of Evgeny and Alexey. Let me explain what particularly confused me - this white spot. According to the book by Kononenko the differential diagnosis of these species (p. 179): E. mixta differs from its congeners in duller wing color with more expressed mossy greenish tint, absence of white reniform stigma, and less expressed or not expressed yellow patch in the hindwing. The latter is not useful for comparison in this case, mixta has the greener stripes — it seems, yes (I looked at my own 6), but here it could be subjective. The white kidney-shaped spot, in my opinion, is a good difference.

20.08.2016 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pseudoips Pseudoips sylpha.

20.08.2016 11:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Pseudoips sylpha (Butler, 1879) ?

20.08.2016 9:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

I looked at it, my first impression, I agree with you. ou. I looked a little more. But I can’t find any differences: one is a little greener, the other is a little brown, but it could be the other way around. You need to know the specific differences and listen to the opinion of Evgeniy and, if possible, Matov.

19.08.2016 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Siona / Maria Pozdnova Sitochroa palealis / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.08.2016 20:33, Maria Pozdnova:

18.08.2016 16:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Samia Samia vuvanlieni.

18.08.2016 16:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Samia Samia vuvanlieni.

18.08.2016 16:11, Irina Nikulina:

And this one is just Euromoia mixta, in my opinion.

18.08.2016 16:10, Irina Nikulina:

Evgeniy, could there be any confusion when taking two pictures? I dealt with my own from Anisimovka, looked at Kononenko (and descriptions too), and here, I think, subpulchra. Sasha, I ask you again - look at the book these 2 types (pl. 22), please, I don't seem to be mistaken, but I can't check on other sites yet.

18.08.2016 16:02, Alex Dumchus:

http://wildsilkmoth-indonesia.com/1sam_vis.html

18.08.2016 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Yuri Semejkin Phyllonorycter / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2016 13:20, Artem Strizhov:

Great photo!

18.08.2016 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

18.08.2016 9:39, Irina Nikulina:

18.08.2016 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

18.08.2016 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Catocala Catocala danilovi.

17.08.2016 22:55, Irina Nikulina:

16.08.2016 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Macroglossum stellatarum / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2016 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Macroglossum stellatarum / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2016 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Macroglossum stellatarum / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2016 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Macroglossum stellatarum / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2016 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Lycaena alciphron / Male & female / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2016 14:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Comibaena delicator Comibaena albimarginata.

16.08.2016 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

16.08.2016 13:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometrinae Comibaena delicator.

16.08.2016 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuoidea / Yuri Semejkin Paracolax tristalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2016 13:25, Yuri Semejkin:

16.08.2016 13:21, Yuri Semejkin:

16.08.2016 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

16.08.2016 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Paracolax fascialis Zanclognatha umbrosalis.

16.08.2016 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Paracolax trilinealis.

16.08.2016 12:53, Yuri Semejkin:

16.08.2016 12:52, Yuri Semejkin:

16.08.2016 9:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

16.08.2016 9:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one is defined correctly.

16.08.2016 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

16.08.2016 3:48, Yuri Semejkin:

15.08.2016 16:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anna Gerasimova Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2016 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.08.2016 15:54, Yuri Semejkin:

15.08.2016 15:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Arctiinae Eilema.

15.08.2016 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.08.2016 14:26, Yuri Semejkin:

15.08.2016 14:12, Yuri Semejkin:

15.08.2016 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.08.2016 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.08.2016 12:15, Yuri Semejkin:

15.08.2016 12:10, Yuri Semejkin:

15.08.2016 12:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.08.2016 12:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Udea / Yuri Semejkin Galleriinae / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2016 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.08.2016 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.08.2016 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Asthena ochrifasciaria.

15.08.2016 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lemaireia Lemaireia luteopeplus.

15.08.2016 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lemaireia Lemaireia luteopeplus.

15.08.2016 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Thitarodes variabilis / Irina Nikulina.

15.08.2016 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Thitarodes variabilis / Irina Nikulina.

15.08.2016 9:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Epione vespertaria / Yuri Semejkin.

15.08.2016 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

15.08.2016 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Semioscopis avellanella / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2016 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Semioscopis avellanella / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2016 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Semioscopis avellanella / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2016 9:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Euproctis niphonis / Irina Nikulina.

15.08.2016 9:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Syngrapha interrogationis / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2016 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Yuri Semejkin Coleophoridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.08.2016 3:55, Yuri Semejkin:

14.08.2016 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Sitochroa verticalis / Irina Nikulina.

14.08.2016 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cucullia umbratica / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.08.2016 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cucullia umbratica / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.08.2016 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cucullia umbratica / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.08.2016 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cucullia umbratica / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.08.2016 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cucullia umbratica / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.08.2016 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cucullia umbratica / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.08.2016 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cucullia umbratica / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.08.2016 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cucullia umbratica / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.08.2016 13:59, Yuri Semejkin:

14.08.2016 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Eucorysses grandis.

14.08.2016 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Eucorysses grandis.

14.08.2016 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia russiae / Confidently identified / Artem Strizhov.

14.08.2016 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.08.2016 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Symphyta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2016 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.08.2016 20:50, Irina Nikulina:

It's a duplicate of photo #26335

13.08.2016 20:50, Irina Nikulina:

Double of the photo #37134.

13.08.2016 17:55, Peter Khramov:

13.08.2016 16:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Acria emarginella (Donovan, 1806) ?

13.08.2016 13:32, Svetlana Shchavelina:

13.08.2016 12:19, Elena Balueva:

13.08.2016 1:28, Yuri Semejkin:

12.08.2016 7:37, Evgeny Komarov:

I'll do it, Yuri!

11.08.2016 22:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Evgeny, then there are no questions! And so that no one else has them, it would be great to post spread specimens with a visible distinctive feature. Moreover, there is not a single specimen with a upper and underside on the website for both species.

11.08.2016 21:25, Irina Nikulina:

Sitochroa verticalis

11.08.2016 20:43, Irina Nikulina:

Odontopera bidentata?

11.08.2016 20:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, it seemed to me that I had already answered this question but I couldn't find my answer. So, I repeat here. I write Identification precision of these photos as confidently because almost all the specimens shot in Barabash-Levada were caught and defined in labs. In addition, a couple dozen of Kirinia were collected there that day - all identified as epaminondas.

11.08.2016 17:43, Irina Nikulina:

11.08.2016 17:15, Irina Nikulina:

10.08.2016 16:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Epione vespertaria Linnaeus, 1767

10.08.2016 10:11, Natalia Cherevko: This species is identified correctly.

09.08.2016 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

09.08.2016 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalera bucephala / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.08.2016 16:45, Yuri Semejkin:

09.08.2016 11:56, Yuri Semejkin:

09.08.2016 11:26, Irina Nikulina:

09.08.2016 1:54, Yuri Semejkin:

09.08.2016 0:04, Irina Nikulina:

08.08.2016 17:58, Yuri Semejkin:

08.08.2016 9:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene! Here are 3 of your pictures and all are identified as Kirinia epaminondas. And why this particular species, and not Kirinia epimenides (Menetries, 1859)? And all the definitions are defined as accurate!

08.08.2016 9:35, Yuri Semejkin:

08.08.2016 9:05, Yuri Semejkin:

08.08.2016 0:18, Yuri Semejkin:

07.08.2016 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

07.08.2016 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

07.08.2016 17:48, Irek Yusupov:

07.08.2016 17:48, Irek Yusupov:

07.08.2016 12:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus Neozephyrus smaragdinus.

07.08.2016 11:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus Neozephyrus smaragdinus.

07.08.2016 11:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus Neozephyrus smaragdinus.

07.08.2016 11:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus Neozephyrus smaragdinus.

07.08.2016 11:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Neozephyrus brillantinus Neozephyrus smaragdinus.

07.08.2016 10:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Noctuoidea Pangrapta lunulata.

07.08.2016 10:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Noctuoidea Pangrapta lunulata.

07.08.2016 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Euploea core / Alex Dumchus.

07.08.2016 10:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Euploea core / Alex Dumchus.

07.08.2016 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

07.08.2016 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ideopsis vulgaris Tirumala gautama.

07.08.2016 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ideopsis vulgaris Tirumala gautama gautama.

07.08.2016 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ideopsis similis Tirumala septentrionis.

07.08.2016 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ideopsis similis Tirumala septentrionis.

07.08.2016 5:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Pangrapta lunulata Stertz, 1915 ?

07.08.2016 5:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Pangrapta lunulata Stertz, 1915 ?

07.08.2016 4:40, Yuri Semejkin:

06.08.2016 11:50, Artem Strizhov:

It's my first time. I have a green one.

06.08.2016 8:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Parasa sinica Parasa hilarata.

06.08.2016 7:51, Alexander Belousov:

The second year I bring them out, and I noticed that males come out of green pupae, and females come out of brown ones. Maybe it's just me? Or does sex of the insect depend on the color? Has anyone else some ideas on this?

06.08.2016 0:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Any pupa has only one age stage - the first, and it is also the last)
These are different color variations.

05.08.2016 15:51, Artem Strizhov:

Are these age stages or just color variations?

04.08.2016 21:05, Irek Yusupov:

04.08.2016 13:15, Yuri Semejkin:

04.08.2016 12:47, Yuri Semejkin:

03.08.2016 16:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Asthena ochrifasciaria Leech, 1897

03.08.2016 15:37, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea core

03.08.2016 15:20, Alex Dumchus:

03.08.2016 15:19, Alex Dumchus:

03.08.2016 15:19, Alex Dumchus:

03.08.2016 15:17, Alex Dumchus:

03.08.2016 15:14, Alex Dumchus:

Tirumala gautama gautama (Moore,1877)

03.08.2016 15:14, Alex Dumchus:

03.08.2016 0:52, Yuri Semejkin:

02.08.2016 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycidae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

02.08.2016 12:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Lycidae sp.

02.08.2016 11:10, Shamil Murtazin:

01.08.2016 20:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Ghoria gigantea / Yuri Semejkin Ghoria collitoides / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2016 20:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Ghoria gigantea / Yuri Semejkin Ghoria collitoides / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2016 4:58, Yuri Semejkin:

31.07.2016 22:35, Irina Nikulina:

31.07.2016 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

31.07.2016 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.07.2016 10:45, Yuri Semejkin:

31.07.2016 10:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Male

31.07.2016 10:34, Yuri Semejkin:

There's a female here.

31.07.2016 8:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Eilema griseola (Hubner, 1803)

30.07.2016 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Eugene Karolinskiy.

30.07.2016 21:22, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

29.07.2016 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Simpiezomias schoenherri.

29.07.2016 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cycnotrachelodes cyanopterus.

29.07.2016 11:23, Yuri Semejkin:

29.07.2016 9:51, Yuri Semejkin:

29.07.2016 8:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Anania sp ?

29.07.2016 7:20, Artem Strizhov:

Melanargia russiae

28.07.2016 20:31, Alex Dumchus:

Argynnis childreni ,Gray, 1831

28.07.2016 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polydrusus obesulus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

28.07.2016 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polydrusus obesulus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

28.07.2016 16:18, Yuri Semejkin:

28.07.2016 16:13, Yuri Semejkin:

28.07.2016 4:55, Yuri Semejkin:

28.07.2016 1:30, Peter Khramov:

27.07.2016 23:10, Irina Nikulina:

Dendrolimus superans?

27.07.2016 11:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cteniopinus Cteniopinus coreanus.

27.07.2016 11:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cteniopinus Cteniopinus coreanus.

27.07.2016 9:42, Vera Volkotrub:

27.07.2016 1:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Orgyia antiqua / Irina Nikulina.

27.07.2016 0:16, Irina Nikulina:

Orgyia antiqua

26.07.2016 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aeshnidae / Imago / Irek Yusupov Aeshna caerulea / Male / Fedor Ovechkin.

26.07.2016 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aeshnidae / Imago / Irek Yusupov Aeshna caerulea / Male / Fedor Ovechkin.

26.07.2016 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Somatochlora / Irek Yusupov Somatochlora metallica / Fedor Ovechkin.

26.07.2016 20:17, Fedor Ovechkin:

Somatochlora metallica

26.07.2016 20:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

Aeshna caerulea, ♂

26.07.2016 20:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

Aeshna caerulea, ♂

26.07.2016 19:32, Irina Nikulina:

26.07.2016 19:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Irina Nikulina.

26.07.2016 19:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Yuri Semejkin Nerice davidi / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2016 18:57, Evgeny Komarov:

26.07.2016 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Ova.

26.07.2016 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

26.07.2016 15:29, Irina Nikulina:

Nerice davidi

26.07.2016 15:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

26.07.2016 15:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

26.07.2016 6:45, Yuri Semejkin:

26.07.2016 6:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

26.07.2016 4:47, Yuri Semejkin:

25.07.2016 12:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

25.07.2016 12:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhodostrophia calabra / Anna Gerasimova Lythria purpuraria / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.07.2016 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.07.2016 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.07.2016 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Ivan Pristrem Psychodidae / Fedor Ovechkin.

24.07.2016 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Irek Yusupov Exoprosopini / Fedor Ovechkin.

24.07.2016 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anna Gerasimova Sergey Novitckiy.

24.07.2016 13:10, Fedor Ovechkin:

Psychodidae

24.07.2016 12:52, Fedor Ovechkin:

Exoprosopini

23.07.2016 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus / Irek Yusupov Monochamus sutor / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.07.2016 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus / Irek Yusupov Monochamus sutor / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.07.2016 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.07.2016 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eudonia puellaris Eudonia.

23.07.2016 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eudonia puellaris / Tentatively identified Eudonia / Confidently identified.

23.07.2016 13:54, Yuri Semejkin:

23.07.2016 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Ematurga atomaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2016 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Ematurga atomaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2016 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Ematurga atomaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2016 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nycteola / Alexandr Zhakov Nycteola degenerana / Basil Sergienko.

23.07.2016 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nycteola / Alexandr Zhakov Nycteola degenerana / Basil Sergienko.

23.07.2016 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nycteola / Alexandr Zhakov Nycteola degenerana / Basil Sergienko.

23.07.2016 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.07.2016 10:44, Yuri Semejkin:

23.07.2016 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

21.07.2016 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.07.2016 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.07.2016 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.07.2016 10:46, Yuri Semejkin:

21.07.2016 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

21.07.2016 9:44, Yuri Semejkin:

21.07.2016 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

21.07.2016 9:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Nycteola / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.07.2016 7:11, Yuri Semejkin:

20.07.2016 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Nycteola / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2016 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Nycteola / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2016 18:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

20.07.2016 13:42, Yuri Semejkin:

19.07.2016 23:36, Fedor Ovechkin:

Bombyliidae

19.07.2016 21:13, Irek Yusupov:

Boloria angarensis?

19.07.2016 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irek Yusupov Yuri Semejkin.

19.07.2016 13:33, Irek Yusupov:

19.07.2016 11:18, Yuri Semejkin:

19.07.2016 9:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

19.07.2016 9:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

19.07.2016 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Polygonia c-album / Yuri Semejkin.

19.07.2016 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Polygonia c-album / Yuri Semejkin.

19.07.2016 4:15, Yuri Semejkin:

19.07.2016 0:21, Peter Khramov:

18.07.2016 23:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Nymphalis xanthomelas (Esper, 1781)

18.07.2016 23:00, Yuri Semejkin:

18.07.2016 22:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Polygonia c-album (Linnaeus, 1758)

18.07.2016 13:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anna Gerasimova Alexandr Zhakov.

18.07.2016 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anna Gerasimova Alexandr Zhakov.

18.07.2016 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diptera / Fedor Ovechkin.

18.07.2016 11:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Asilidae / Yuri Semejkin.

18.07.2016 9:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Asilidae

18.07.2016 9:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Diptera

18.07.2016 9:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

Diptera

17.07.2016 19:27, Anna Gerasimova:

17.07.2016 15:35, Yuri Semejkin:

17.07.2016 10:27, Yuri Semejkin:

16.07.2016 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hyles / Irek Yusupov Deilephila elpenor / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2016 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hyles / Irek Yusupov Deilephila elpenor / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2016 11:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hyles / Irek Yusupov Deilephila elpenor / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2016 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diaprepesilla flavomarginaria / Irina Nikulina.

16.07.2016 8:46, Irina Nikulina:

Diaprepesilla flavomarginaria

16.07.2016 7:42, Irina Nikulina:

16.07.2016 0:57, Lev Bely:

16.07.2016 0:53, Lev Bely:

15.07.2016 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Bromius obscurus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

15.07.2016 20:02, Boris Georgi:

15.07.2016 17:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

15.07.2016 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindelinae / Confidently identified / Irek Yusupov Cicindela sylvatica / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 17:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

15.07.2016 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vera, no question.Thanks for the information.
It just got into moderation without sings (apparently another glitch) :(

15.07.2016 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Culex / Vera Volkotrub.

15.07.2016 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Culex / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub.

15.07.2016 13:21, Vera Volkotrub:

Initially I uploaded it as Culex, then I looked at it - no definition. I thought the admins were removed it, but it turns out they don’t know.

15.07.2016 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Bromius obscurus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Bromius obscurus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Bromius obscurus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 12:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 12:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2016 12:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.07.2016 12:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

14.07.2016 1:34, Lev Bely:

14.07.2016 1:27, Lev Bely:

14.07.2016 1:20, Lev Bely:

14.07.2016 0:38, Yuri Semejkin:

14.07.2016 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Go to the view page and look to the right block: there is no photo.
Also under the button "Edit photo data" it says "Additional gallery"
And in general, when selecting an additional gallery, the photo was there when I wrote the message.
Check it out.

13.07.2016 22:59, Peter Khramov:

13.07.2016 22:58, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, why do you think that the photo is in an additional gallery? As far as I can see, it is in quite a basic one.
Brackets are placed, done.

13.07.2016 22:54, Peter Khramov:

13.07.2016 22:03, Boris Georgi:

13.07.2016 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

13.07.2016 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Crambidae / Irek Yusupov Agriphila straminella / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2016 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Crambidae / Irek Yusupov Agriphila straminella / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2016 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Crambidae / Irek Yusupov Agriphila straminella / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2016 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.07.2016 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Crambidae / Anna Gerasimova Synaphe moldavica / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2016 8:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

>>>>

13.07.2016 3:00, Yuri Semejkin:

12.07.2016 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus / Imago / Irek Yusupov Monochamus sutor / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.07.2016 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus / Imago / Irek Yusupov Monochamus sutor / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.07.2016 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Curculionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.07.2016 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Curculionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.07.2016 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus / Imago / Irek Yusupov Monochamus sutor / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.07.2016 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus / Imago / Irek Yusupov Monochamus sutor / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.07.2016 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Komarov.

12.07.2016 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.07.2016 14:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.07.2016 14:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.07.2016 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Komarov.

12.07.2016 12:18, Vladimir Deryabin:

12.07.2016 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

>>>>

12.07.2016 9:02, Spenser Galloway:

This looks like an Asian Tiger Mosquito (Aedes albopictus)

12.07.2016 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

12.07.2016 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

11.07.2016 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ivan Tislenko Vladimir Savchuk.

11.07.2016 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

11.07.2016 18:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Nossa palaearctica / Basil Sergienko.

11.07.2016 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I think it's time to put an end to this photo discussion.
There are really a lot of P. machaon here, but the Trogus lapidator is currently the only photo it the gallery :)
And the pupa of the host at the photo is to the purpose too, I think.
Summary: it is necessary to return this photo back to the main gallery from the additional one)))
P.S. And it is necessary to enclose the name of the author of the description in brackets in the name of the species: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id69002/

11.07.2016 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon / Pupa / Vasiliy Feoktistov Trogus lapidator / Imago / Andrei Humala.

11.07.2016 12:55, Yuri Semejkin:

11.07.2016 12:50, Yuri Semejkin:

10.07.2016 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

10.07.2016 15:45, Peter Khramov:

10.07.2016 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

10.07.2016 15:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

10.07.2016 9:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Trichoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2016 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

08.07.2016 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.07.2016 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.07.2016 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.07.2016 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.07.2016 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.07.2016 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Adosomus Adosomus granulosus.

08.07.2016 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Adosomus Adosomus granulosus.

08.07.2016 14:11, Yuri Semejkin:

08.07.2016 14:01, Vera Volkotrub:

08.07.2016 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

07.07.2016 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Actenicerus Actenicerus alternatus.

07.07.2016 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Actenicerus Actenicerus alternatus.

07.07.2016 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Liotrichus Liotrichus ferrugineipennis.

07.07.2016 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Actenicerus Actenicerus alternatus.

07.07.2016 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Agrypnus Agrypnus binodulus.

07.07.2016 11:15, Vera Volkotrub:

07.07.2016 9:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Euthrix potatoria.

07.07.2016 9:21, Vera Volkotrub:

07.07.2016 8:36, Vera Volkotrub:

07.07.2016 6:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

06.07.2016 12:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.07.2016 12:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.07.2016 9:54, Artem Strizhov:

05.07.2016 23:18, Irek Yusupov:

Amara

05.07.2016 23:14, Irek Yusupov:

05.07.2016 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.07.2016 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cicindelinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.07.2016 13:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

05.07.2016 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

05.07.2016 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

04.07.2016 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dermestidae / Irek Yusupov Dermestes lardarius / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.07.2016 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dermestidae / Irek Yusupov Dermestes lardarius / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.07.2016 15:40, Yuri Semejkin:

04.07.2016 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips / Yuri Semejkin Archips xylosteana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.07.2016 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips / Yuri Semejkin Archips xylosteana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.07.2016 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips / Yuri Semejkin Archips xylosteana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.07.2016 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips / Yuri Semejkin Archips xylosteana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.07.2016 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips / Yuri Semejkin Archips xylosteana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.07.2016 15:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

04.07.2016 14:23, Yuri Semejkin:

04.07.2016 9:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.07.2016 1:46, Yuri Semejkin:

04.07.2016 0:34, Yuri Semejkin:

03.07.2016 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

03.07.2016 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

03.07.2016 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

03.07.2016 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

03.07.2016 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Archips Archips viola.

03.07.2016 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrei Humala.

03.07.2016 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrei Humala.

03.07.2016 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrei Humala.

03.07.2016 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindelinae / Fedor Ovechkin Cicindela sylvatica / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.07.2016 18:51, Peter Khramov:

03.07.2016 18:12, Irina Nikulina:

03.07.2016 17:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Archips viola Falkovitsh, 1965 http://blog.tamagaro.net/?p=3418

03.07.2016 14:11, Yuri Semejkin:

03.07.2016 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.07.2016 13:20, Yuri Semejkin:

03.07.2016 13:17, Yuri Semejkin:

03.07.2016 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.07.2016 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.07.2016 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.07.2016 10:47, Yuri Semejkin:

03.07.2016 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae Archips.

03.07.2016 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.07.2016 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia Lacanobia aliena.

03.07.2016 10:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia Lacanobia contigua.

03.07.2016 10:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta Subacronicta megacephala.

03.07.2016 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta Acronicta major.

03.07.2016 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta Acronicta major.

03.07.2016 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta Acronicta major.

03.07.2016 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta Acronicta major.

03.07.2016 10:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta Acronicta major.

03.07.2016 10:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta Acronicta major.

03.07.2016 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Athetis pallidipennis Athetis albisignata.

03.07.2016 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.07.2016 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae Apamea sordens.

03.07.2016 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna monticola Mythimna turca.

03.07.2016 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.07.2016 10:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

I won't move this one, I don't see Mythimna turca here. This might just confuse people. Maybe this is @turca@, if you have a lot of experience and see hundreds and hundreds of both types. But for those who compare just 5 photos, this is Mythimna divergens.

03.07.2016 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

03.07.2016 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pabulatrix pabulatricula Apamea sordens.

03.07.2016 3:43, Yuri Semejkin:

03.07.2016 0:16, Irina Nikulina:

03.07.2016 0:10, Irina Nikulina:

03.07.2016 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

03.07.2016 0:05, Irina Nikulina:

Acronicta major

03.07.2016 0:03, Irina Nikulina:

Acronicta major

03.07.2016 0:02, Irina Nikulina:

02.07.2016 23:59, Irina Nikulina:

02.07.2016 23:58, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna turca was identified by Matov A.Yu. (ZIN RAS)

02.07.2016 23:54, Irina Nikulina:

02.07.2016 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Apamea sordens

02.07.2016 2:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Archips rosana (Linnaeus, 1758) ?

01.07.2016 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Anna Gerasimova Odonata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.06.2016 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrei Humala.

30.06.2016 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrei Humala.

30.06.2016 6:50, Yuri Semejkin:

29.06.2016 22:34, Irina Nikulina:

29.06.2016 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

29.06.2016 20:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ourapteryx / Yuri Semejkin.

29.06.2016 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Irina Nikulina Oligonyx vulnerata / Oleg Pekarsky.

29.06.2016 18:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Irina Nikulina Cucullia lucifuga / Oleg Pekarsky.

29.06.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Irina Nikulina Cucullia lucifuga / Oleg Pekarsky.

29.06.2016 17:18, Yuri Semejkin:

29.06.2016 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

29.06.2016 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

29.06.2016 17:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Alexey Perelygin Acronicta vulpina / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.06.2016 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

29.06.2016 16:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Melanthia procellata / Yuri Semejkin.

29.06.2016 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Endropiodes indictinaria / Yuri Semejkin.

29.06.2016 16:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Melanthia procellata (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

29.06.2016 16:07, Yuri Semejkin:

29.06.2016 15:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Endropiodes indictinaria (Bremer, 1864)

28.06.2016 21:27, Peter Khramov:

28.06.2016 19:56, Evgeny Komarov:

28.06.2016 19:36, Artem Strizhov:

28.06.2016 9:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2016 9:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae Leptura aethiops.

28.06.2016 1:02, Yuri Semejkin:

27.06.2016 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Leptura quadrifasciata / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.06.2016 22:07, Peter Khramov:

27.06.2016 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Angerona prunaria / Female / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2016 16:37, Yuri Semejkin:

27.06.2016 15:36, Irina Nikulina:

Angerona prunaria

26.06.2016 21:38, Ivan Tislenko:

26.06.2016 14:20, Yuri Semejkin:

26.06.2016 2:42, Yuri Semejkin:

25.06.2016 20:22, Shamil Murtazin:

25.06.2016 20:19, Shamil Murtazin:

25.06.2016 18:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.06.2016 17:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Adelidae / Tentatively identified / Shamil Murtazin Nemophora fasciella / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

25.06.2016 15:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

25.06.2016 12:26, Evgeny Komarov:

25.06.2016 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon ussuriensis.

25.06.2016 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon ussuriensis.

25.06.2016 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

25.06.2016 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

25.06.2016 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

25.06.2016 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

24.06.2016 15:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Denis Tumanov Tarucus balkanica / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.06.2016 9:59, Zoran Bozovic:

Hello. Don't You see the mistake? This is not Acrobasis legatea!

24.06.2016 8:04, Shamil Murtazin:

24.06.2016 7:02, Artem Strizhov:

24.06.2016 3:48, Yuri Semejkin:

24.06.2016 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae.

24.06.2016 0:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

24.06.2016 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae.

23.06.2016 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stenocorus meridianus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.06.2016 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Agapanthia villosoviridescens / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.06.2016 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.06.2016 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

23.06.2016 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.06.2016 23:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

23.06.2016 22:07, Shamil Murtazin:

23.06.2016 22:06, Shamil Murtazin:

23.06.2016 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oedemera amurensis.

23.06.2016 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

23.06.2016 16:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis rivularis Lepidoptera.

23.06.2016 12:21, Artem Strizhov:

Plebejus idas

23.06.2016 12:20, Artem Strizhov:

Plebejus idas

23.06.2016 3:56, sanches 76:




23.06.2016 3:55, sanches 76:

21.06.2016 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Phragmatobia amurensis / Irina Nikulina.

21.06.2016 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Phragmatobia amurensis / Irina Nikulina.

21.06.2016 22:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Xanthorhoe rectantemediana / Irina Nikulina.

21.06.2016 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

21.06.2016 18:24, Irina Nikulina:

21.06.2016 5:42, Vera Volkotrub: This species is identified correctly.

20.06.2016 21:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Euchloe ausonia?

20.06.2016 21:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Nemophora metallica?

20.06.2016 9:05, Yuri Semejkin:

20.06.2016 7:20, Evgeny Komarov:

19.06.2016 19:15, Irina Nikulina:

19.06.2016 17:23, Yuri Semejkin:

19.06.2016 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis ilos Neptis philyra.

19.06.2016 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ennominae / Fedor Ovechkin Ematurga atomaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.06.2016 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ennominae / Fedor Ovechkin Ematurga atomaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.06.2016 16:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ennominae / Fedor Ovechkin Ematurga atomaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.06.2016 15:13, Yuri Semejkin:

19.06.2016 11:16, Yuri Semejkin:

19.06.2016 9:48, Evgeny Komarov:

18.06.2016 13:57, Yuri Semejkin:

18.06.2016 11:43, Yuri Semejkin:

18.06.2016 10:40, Evgeny Komarov:

18.06.2016 8:47, Yuri Semejkin:

17.06.2016 17:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis philyra Menetries, 1859

17.06.2016 13:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

Underside.

17.06.2016 13:19, Fedor Ovechkin:

17.06.2016 7:40, Artem Strizhov:

17.06.2016 7:39, Artem Strizhov:

16.06.2016 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.06.2016 16:04, Peter Khramov:

16.06.2016 11:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lamprodila virgata.

16.06.2016 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ischnomera abdominalis.

16.06.2016 11:06, Yuri Semejkin:

16.06.2016 10:59, Yuri Semejkin:

16.06.2016 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.06.2016 10:22, Yuri Semejkin:

16.06.2016 10:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.06.2016 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.06.2016 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.06.2016 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.06.2016 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2016 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

16.06.2016 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2016 7:39, Yuri Semejkin:

16.06.2016 7:06, Yuri Semejkin:

16.06.2016 2:07, Yuri Semejkin:

15.06.2016 20:15, Peter Khramov:

15.06.2016 19:34, Peter Khramov:

15.06.2016 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

15.06.2016 17:33, Peter Khramov:

15.06.2016 16:09, Peter Khramov:

Who else thinks, whether to cover (or not clear whether the deep slide) See "Material"? Look, there is no special interest, and religious photographers dried tarakanyshi scare ...
What do you think?

15.06.2016 16:04, Peter Khramov:

Basil, please: write, pliz, making notes on the geography of photons in such a form http://insecta.pro//ru/gallery/58144, and not as you write with the same picture previously. This is especially true photographs of new, inexperienced users.

15.06.2016 16:03, Peter Khramov:

Sabina, please indicate the geography and, if possible, a date / time to shoot this photo.

15.06.2016 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesperiidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.06.2016 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eysarcoris gibbosus.

15.06.2016 6:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Eysarcoris gibbosus Jakovlev, 1904 there are no

14.06.2016 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Myrmeleon / Confidently identified Myrmeleon formicarius / Tentatively identified.

14.06.2016 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Myrmeleon Myrmeleon formicarius.

14.06.2016 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Myrmeleon / Confidently identified Myrmeleon formicarius / Tentatively identified.

14.06.2016 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Myrmeleon / Confidently identified Myrmeleon formicarius / Tentatively identified.

14.06.2016 0:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Tenthredinidae ?

13.06.2016 22:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Beautiful =) Also a couple of checkered saw today ...

13.06.2016 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2016 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

13.06.2016 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

13.06.2016 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably var. amurensis Tesar, 1938

13.06.2016 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Gametis jucunda / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.06.2016 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea durvillei Idea durvillei theia.

12.06.2016 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

12.06.2016 21:43, Igor Ivannikov:

theia

12.06.2016 21:20, Shamil Murtazin:

What then specify the correct step?

12.06.2016 19:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hypena tristalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2016 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Similarly, if a long time that does not change, remind me!

12.06.2016 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lemaireia.

12.06.2016 19:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lemaireia.

12.06.2016 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, then I kind of add, and now transferred to the genus, to avoid losing :)

12.06.2016 19:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Samia.

12.06.2016 19:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Samia.

12.06.2016 18:15, Alex Dumchus:

Lemaireia luteopeplus aureopeplus, (Nässig & Holloway, 1988)

12.06.2016 17:11, Alex Dumchus:

Samia vuvanlieni (Naumann, Peigler & Läffle, 2014)

12.06.2016 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the wood - offering true for insects, without a search engine.
Regarding the search engine - will be separate from the insects.

12.06.2016 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.06.2016 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.06.2016 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.06.2016 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

I is not talking, because honestly, I'm not interested. I do not see what to catch my interest. If lepidoptera.ru/pro was less specific and let the sky-a lot of information, then insecta.pro/ru giant monster appeared. But somehow it managed to find an old swamp, and now has a search engine. Peter, your thoughts and feelings run strong quickly.if the original was at least the appearance of the horizon, but now we are not in the world, and in deep space, where everything is very far away.

12.06.2016 10:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autosticha modicella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

12.06.2016 10:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chionodes viduella / Yuri Semejkin.

12.06.2016 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eulia ministrana / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2016 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eulia ministrana / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2016 10:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eulia ministrana / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.06.2016 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Updated view for all three.

11.06.2016 14:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

underside

11.06.2016 14:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

underside

11.06.2016 14:22, Fedor Ovechkin:

underside

11.06.2016 13:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Chionodes viduella ( Fabricius, 1794)

11.06.2016 12:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Autosticha modicella (Christoph, 1882) ?

11.06.2016 7:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nymphalidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Limenitis reducta / Evgeny Komarov.

11.06.2016 7:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nymphalidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Limenitis reducta / Evgeny Komarov.

11.06.2016 7:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Fedor Ovechkin Coccinella quinquepunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

11.06.2016 7:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Fedor Ovechkin Coccinella quinquepunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

11.06.2016 7:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Fedor Ovechkin Chrysomela populi / Evgeny Komarov.

11.06.2016 7:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Fedor Ovechkin Chrysomela populi / Evgeny Komarov.

10.06.2016 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2016 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2016 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2016 15:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Rod used to be in the in-ones given. But I do not insist. In the family, because the family.

10.06.2016 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, by the way. Gathered I did a good series Thyatira batis .
And at the same point where a butterfly that is shown in this photo.
Really a lot of it)
Interesting.
Just about a year and implemented as intended)))

10.06.2016 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let pobudet in the family.
The fact that this is an extremely difficult group in the definition of the pictures (and sometimes even to the genus).

10.06.2016 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Staphylinus / Yuri Semejkin Staphylinidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2016 13:08, Leonid Grishaev: This species is identified correctly.

10.06.2016 6:25, Alex Dumchus:

Agalope

09.06.2016 22:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Konstantin Efetov - curator Zygaenidae. There's a question, there is kind, he is a synonym, or a combination of the other.

09.06.2016 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Really do not know, who nonche tropics engaged on the site (and there-whether it is a supervisor) (
For all bugs and issues to me to Eugene. To me as well and can be accessed by bedbugs (ext. Load).
But in the butterflies now I can not add up to what the tropics.but also ordinary urticaria (figuratively) (
Here, where there was a theme of who and what the site does, but I can not find her. Look for yourself :)

09.06.2016 20:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

P P Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2016 20:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epicallia villica.

09.06.2016 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / P P.

09.06.2016 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.06.2016 18:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cryptophagidae / Evgeny Komarov.

09.06.2016 18:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cryptophagidae / Evgeny Komarov.

09.06.2016 18:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cryptophagidae / Evgeny Komarov.

09.06.2016 18:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cryptophagidae / Evgeny Komarov.

09.06.2016 18:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cryptophagidae / Evgeny Komarov.

09.06.2016 18:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cryptophagidae / Evgeny Komarov.

09.06.2016 18:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cryptophagidae / Evgeny Komarov.

09.06.2016 18:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Cryptophagidae / Evgeny Komarov.

09.06.2016 11:50, Alex Dumchus:

And who is the curator and then deal here? Achelura bani, she and Vietnam Achelura bani)))

09.06.2016 8:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, here it is necessary to understand the curator. I am a butterfly now I can only endure.
What else to do (add taxa, etc.) I can not, I have no rights.

09.06.2016 7:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Last night, too, on the balcony of her at the light picked up. Match :)

09.06.2016 7:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Male & female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.06.2016 7:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.06.2016 7:29, Alex Dumchus:

Achelura bani!

09.06.2016 7:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Gerris insularis / Yuri Semejkin.

09.06.2016 7:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gerris insularis.

09.06.2016 7:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Parum colligata / Alex Dumchus.

09.06.2016 7:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Parum colligata / Alex Dumchus.

09.06.2016 7:17, Alex Dumchus:

Parum colligata (Walker, 1856)

09.06.2016 7:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae Strangalomorpha tenuis.

09.06.2016 6:46, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. I myself will not. I have extra copies. In case, if you want to share your butterflies, it can send for nothing :)

08.06.2016 21:45, Peter Khramov:

How?..

08.06.2016 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma Pentatoma japonica.

08.06.2016 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma Pentatoma japonica.

08.06.2016 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

08.06.2016 21:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I have cooked, especially with China)))

08.06.2016 21:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Organize through the website article

08.06.2016 20:50, Oleg Pekarsky:

Released work
Pekarsky, Oleg. 2016. Taxonomic notes on the Lygephila vulcanea (Butler, 1881) species-group (Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Toxocampinae). Zootaxa 4121 (1): 95-100.
I came out, who are interested.

08.06.2016 13:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Argynnis paphia (Linnaeus, 1758)

08.06.2016 12:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Strangalomorpha tenuis Solsky, 1873 ?

08.06.2016 9:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Pentatoma japonica ( Distant, 1882)

07.06.2016 15:53, Peter Khramov:

But some texts here and? .. I do not catch up ...

07.06.2016 10:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Gerris insularis Motschulsky, 1866. In the base there.

07.06.2016 10:19, Irek Yusupov:

Accepted. I'll try to do.

07.06.2016 10:02, Ivan Pristrem:

Well then fine.

07.06.2016 7:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphium tamerlana.

07.06.2016 7:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphium tamerlana.

06.06.2016 19:51, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium tamerlanus (Oberthur, 1876)

06.06.2016 19:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Irek, to determine the species of this genus are needed clearer pictures top, where it is possible to see the presence / absence and location of Seta-bearing long on elytra. No other way.

06.06.2016 18:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Irek Yusupov Amara / Evgeny Komarov.

06.06.2016 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put point.
Here Calvia decemguttata: http://insectamo.ru/coleo/65-zhuki/coccinellidae/621-calvia-decemguttata
But Calvia quatuordecimguttata: http://insectamo.ru/coleo/65-zhuki/coccinellidae/622-calvia-quatuordecimguttata
I bow to the second (enough to compare the location and number. Spots on elytra).

06.06.2016 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calvia decemguttata / Yuri Semejkin Calvia quatuordecimguttata / Ivan Tislenko.

06.06.2016 15:04, Ivan Tislenko:

I for the transfer. Firstly the number and location of points is the same as that of Calvia quatuordecimguttata (although they pale). The second "black mask of Zorro", which it is not Calvia decemguttata and have Calvia quatuordecimguttata.

06.06.2016 14:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Indeed one. And what these things mean? In the other. Regions that do not have albinism or what? We only white, etc. Is not seen and can not be recognized. Okay, maybe someone will interpret over time.
Let's go back to this picture. Ivan, I'm not particularly delved ladybugs, but it seems you have to decide whether or not to transfer.

06.06.2016 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2016 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2016 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2016 13:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2016 13:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2016 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Tanaecia cocytus cocytus / Female / Alex Dumchus.

06.06.2016 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Tanaecia cocytus cocytus / Female / Alex Dumchus.

06.06.2016 10:33, Ivan Tislenko:

The atlas on ZIN http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/coccintr.htm site only your Calvia decemguttata without spots. The rest of the photos of three different cows with clear spots.

06.06.2016 7:29, Alex Dumchus:

Cynitia cocytus cocytus (Fabricius, 1787), female

06.06.2016 3:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Dropped shot Calvia desemguttata .http: //insecta.pro/ru/gallery/57965 Definition in due time was made by Andrei Ukrainian ZIN. For a species characterized by the presence on nadkr. 5 slightly visible white spots, which often disappear. (To insects of the Far East of the USSR., T. 3, ch. 2).
As for this image, on the basis of the foregoing, I probably agree with Ivan, that picture is not Calvia decemguttata, and Calvia quatuordecimguttata.Along the way, then the question immediately arises. And the rest of Calvia decemguttata placed on the site with pronounced white spots (which, according to the determinant should not be so crisp) if they really are? Or maybe life there are some subspecies?

05.06.2016 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.06.2016 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.06.2016 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.06.2016 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.06.2016 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.06.2016 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.06.2016 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.06.2016 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.06.2016 17:13, Ivan Tislenko:

In my opinion this is not Calvia decemguttata, and Calvia quatuordecimguttata http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838177

05.06.2016 13:48, Igor Sakhno:

Is not the female?

04.06.2016 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.06.2016 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

the group can be distinguished from non-specialist butterfly caterpillars easily.
In sawfly larvae prolegs 6-8 pairs, while the butterfly caterpillars up to 5 pairs.
Something like this :)

04.06.2016 2:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Also apparently sawfly. He sits on klёne zelenokorom.

04.06.2016 1:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil Good! And if we will see the number of pairs prolegs, you can identify? The larva is mine.

03.06.2016 21:28, Igor Sakhno:

I wonder whether it is possible to create a caterpillar and chrysalis artificial conditions to get a color uniform?

03.06.2016 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, you're right. Court of bending this larva of a sawfly is. Still, to see the number of pairs prolegs, but this perspective, it is not possible (

03.06.2016 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Yuri Semejkin.

03.06.2016 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tenthredinidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2016 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2016 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2016 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea leuconoe Idea leuconoe fregela.

03.06.2016 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea leuconoe Idea leuconoe princesa.

03.06.2016 18:37, Igor Ivannikov:

princesa

03.06.2016 18:33, Igor Ivannikov:

fregela

03.06.2016 15:51, Peter Khramov:

Basil, we are now in this topic and discuss together how it will look. The offer is:
Tree taxa (Section Classification) hide, use it only to find, mounting photos, etc.
Farther.
Wood sees the curators. They have their rights and, in those taxa that are fixed / confirmed, put the label, they say, everything is OK.In this tag taxa are shown in the section Classification and without labels - not shown.
Who thinks that?

03.06.2016 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What is meant by partitioning unexamined?
Lord, please explain how it is now will look like?

03.06.2016 15:09, Peter Khramov:

We discussed with Eugene. It turns out that after enough to conceal unexamined areas of classification, so that the picture was more than decent.Regarding the search engine - soon it will work separately from insects, and when it is all in finished form, we can return to the question whether there is a need for any association, or is it just different searchlights.

03.06.2016 13:45, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Peter, cow and will ship to butterflies?)

03.06.2016 13:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.06.2016 13:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.06.2016 13:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Evgeny Slobodskoy Carabus billbergi / Evgeny Komarov.

03.06.2016 12:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Sawflies?

03.06.2016 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suppose that before the advent of the curator is to be in the Hemiptera order not to multiply the gallery uncertain.
If suddenly happen curator (alas, unlikely), he will understand and will put everything in its place.

03.06.2016 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.06.2016 10:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Evgeny Slobodskoy Atara arata / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.06.2016 9:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Atara arata (Bremer, 1861)

03.06.2016 7:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes anybody for nothing chases. Now holotype is possible through an Internet forward. It previously used email or drove themselves.

03.06.2016 6:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Psyllids or psylla. Now they are considered as a unit Psillinea suborder Homoptera, although some overseas persistently carry them to the order Hemiptera
So I for detachment Homoptera, and fellow moderators or curator determined themselves.

03.06.2016 6:33, Ivan Pristrem:

Well ... I think in the future, when there will be a similar search engine according to the documents, these photos will need to be placed there, it's exclusive material, all scientists of the first description chase at breakneck speed.

02.06.2016 22:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry, and on seriously? I fully believe you on tropical butterflies, but you talk about sensu lato site!

02.06.2016 22:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I have butterflies from tropical Asia know better than Palearctic)))

02.06.2016 20:58, Evgeny Komarov:

As I see the website! First, a bit of our resources. The active core - 4-5 people, most of which has limited information on the scale of Russia and the neighboring states in one unit (usually - a small part of them), and the rest with the help of colleagues and the Internet.Next: to attract professionals possible only if the resource they will see, along with a great / less pictures, the desire to have a professional approach (normal taxonomy in the first place).Hence, if the sober to assess their capabilities, is now the site should be dedicated to several units that can draw (with the help of friends, colleagues, and network resources) available frames. This is the first. Second. Geographically limited coverage.Well, never can we not now work properly with the faunas of Palearctic outside - it's dilettantism, which I absolutely do not like. After all, as it is now: a bug / butterfly from South America, Malaysia, etc. We climb into their collections (who has), to the sites, and colleagues write, "define".And it has its own tale its professionals working with these faunas. Plus their views on it. As a result, we have on the site (for exotics) complete amateurism.
To continuously maintain the system taxa represented online (constantly come out with new audit groups, new descriptions, etc.) Need constant work of curators, tracking new publications (ie, seriously interested in / working with the group). Ay !!! Where are they? They may appear, but on condition that the site does not establish itself claims to be global, as a professional, serious approach. It takes time and accurate work.Now the site has a very decent functionality, which requires bringing to mind, but the foundation is there, and one that many do not have the specialized sites. If this is all brought to the convenience and display of information available - will be a great resource (after the cut-off of excess).This "extra" may be no harm to the time when (and if) attract specialists for other groups), that will not immediately (it's not one year).I'm afraid to get bored with their references to the Plantarium, but with it I work about the same, but no catastrophic changes over the years there has not occurred, only the progressive functional development, adjustment taxonomy. And we have in Russia, the permanent revolution.
Bottom line.At this stage, I would like to see the site, which shows the 3-4 unit (obsuzhdaemo) and geographically covering Palearctic (it is even unattainable maximum). To do this, there is a very strong foundation: the functional (bring to mind what that is) and volume charts (need to engage seriously in the descriptions).I see the following groups website: Lepidoptera (naturally), Coleoptera (very not all succeed even in build), Odonata (there are specialists and the group is not large), it is possible - Heteroptera (available for photographing and can attract a minimum of good fans) . Offers (Real) and the expression of views about my, quite sharp (pent) post are welcome.And it concluded. If you do not do what we have (removing superfluous), we get the New Vasyuki or another site with a mass of beautiful pictures, interesting a certain category of an Internet visitors. If there will be a lot of that is possible, and advertisers.
Peter, can I was harsh, but painful, I'm sorry.

02.06.2016 18:20, Irina Nikulina:

While for a long time writing, page not updated, your post, Peter, did not see. Now while I will not add anything, very busy, but it turns out that it would be necessary)

02.06.2016 18:18, Irina Nikulina:

While in the pre-departure hectic weeks pregnant with what and how to write, Eugene already done and made it so that in effect, and add -So do not need much ... Honestly, started several times - and washed, I did not want to unsubscribe, and clearly articulate all the big doubt not work (- a difficult topic ... it is difficult precisely because the site is given a lot of effort,time, the soul, and feel like he is increasingly losing what originally drew me to him, not very happy ... Peter knows that I did not support the transition to the insects, and even in "John Donne" expressed a very big question that we pull such amounts and such tasks.It is not desirable that the site was converted into a warehouse just beautiful (at best), but futile pictures, more and more resembling "Murzilki", which are enough in the network, as has been written here.Even Lepidoptera - this is quite difficult if you do everything well and competently! I dreamed of the reduced, albeit slowly, in the order it is "home", but serious Lepidoptera with sufficient working supervisors.And the development is seen to be improved and carefully bringing to mind the common efforts of all the fact that already had. Of course, welcoming all the innovations that make the site easier and clearer. But the idea that the site difficult to manage the huge "monster" I do not like, and to be silent about it would not be fair.To this we essentially Eugene virtually nothing to add, just join. Peter sat with going without an Internet temporarily (I hope)) the duties of illustrating types of interrupt, by phone ready to discuss and answer any questions. I care what decisions will be taken.

02.06.2016 17:46, Peter Khramov:

Probably, the search engine will be run as a separate site, and in fact there could be discussed - combine them with insecticide or not. This is so that no one was frightened: -)
And in the course of the discussion ...Eugene (and for all the question), but as soon as "our site will lose too much", "it would be better to do it is a functional site", "three or four companies, and work on them" and "And it should be?" And who He sees how insects (or Lepidoptera)? What does it do and why? Goals and objectives? Or maybe even the preliminary findings?)) Is interesting ...

02.06.2016 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Phoebis argante Phoebis argante rorata.

02.06.2016 17:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Phoebis argante Phoebis argante rorata.

02.06.2016 16:54, Evgeny Komarov:

Shamil, "And I like a very neutral attitude to all this, as well as Eugene".
Yes, not very neutral, I am. It seems to me that with the inclusion of the gallery insekta.pro photos from other sites, our site will lose too much. First of all - their independence.Again, even if the imported images will be taken from reputable sites and correct definition, then all their just lost among the thousands of extra (albeit the most remarkable) images.Question: Why? I understand Peter's from that perspective that swung on a very heavy for a small (very) amateur enthusiasts group the task of creating a website covering the entire fauna of insects, he sees that its implementation of such forces is simply impossible. Hence the idea is to attract the available network resources.But we can never even remotely compete with the specialized sites for a variety of reasons. Firstly, because most of them are present on these groups of experts and, because of this, they have authority. Well, did we not just attract specialists such changes in the site policy.Even when they make the transition from a Lepidoptera insects, I expressed my doubts about the feasibility of this idea, the available resources (for good, is the power of several major institutions Zoological level). would be limited to a couple of teams and it would be prohibitively difficult for a small group of fans.But then I'm doing beetles had some sweet candy in the form of adding the beetles as a result of restructuring. Who better to do it in the framework of a functional site is already available, and cutting knowingly unrealizable our own part of it, ie, groups for whom even an adequate system can not be created.Leave three or four companies, and work on them.
The search engine can be useful, in my view, only as a search engine for auxiliary purposes in the determination and collection of information (to me quite enough and trusted sites of Google), but not as a source of images on the site.In this case, just simply create a totally different life, it has nothing in common with insects and TB Lepidoptera, while incomplete duplicating existing highly specialized network resources. And it should be?
As an outcome. I am on this site has been present for many years, almost since its inception.And I do not want to lose interest in participating in its work.

02.06.2016 14:42, Igor Ivannikov:

rorata

02.06.2016 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Vlad Proklov.

02.06.2016 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera Rhopaloscelis unifasciatus.

02.06.2016 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera Rhopaloscelis unifasciatus.

02.06.2016 9:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Rhopaloscelis unifasciatus Blessig, 1873

02.06.2016 9:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Rhopaloscelis unifasciatus Blessig, 1873

31.05.2016 20:30, Leonid Grishaev: This species is identified correctly.

31.05.2016 20:28, Leonid Grishaev: This species is identified correctly.

31.05.2016 17:09, Alex Lender:

Celypha rurestrana?

31.05.2016 16:45, Alex Lender:

Phyllobius pyri?

31.05.2016 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera Agelasa nigriceps.

30.05.2016 16:57, Peter Khramov:

What for? In most cases, a useful part of the text will be duplicated in an explicit form on the same page.

30.05.2016 16:22, Ivan Pristrem:

In the distant (or not so distant) future, it would be good to teach it to recognize text from pictures.

30.05.2016 12:53, Peter Khramov:

And there is. The robot does not know this phot copy or the original description or something.

30.05.2016 8:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Agelasa nigriceps Motsch., 1860

30.05.2016 7:24, Ivan Pristrem:

And, everything I knew. There, on the site not only shows the photo, but also scans books and maps with locations of finds.

30.05.2016 7:22, Ivan Pristrem:

I found some strange blotches. Request - Hesperiidae, the second page.

29.05.2016 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

1) editing of information about the types of person who the most-the Old hammered. In the sense of a self-correcting errors.
2) The card: delete / move photos from one point to another. Again, the correction of an error, if they will come to light, or to specify a point.

29.05.2016 22:47, Peter Khramov:

About debugging (excluding export data from other sites, such as wood): in addition to working with the subspecies we still have some major visyaki?

29.05.2016 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. In principle, do not think that I am against.
Just these things in any case be discussed.
So it is accepted and it is not necessary to change not agree until leaving the site (now seriously).

29.05.2016 21:56, Peter Khramov:

Basil, for this discussion, I added Shamil without prior discussion. No one else new is added.
Shamil site specialization - it's not bad, but bad if they are duplicates, here's the thing ... While the search can be really for the first time to separate, you see, are clear differences ...

29.05.2016 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, such questions are discussed in this topic. Where is the discussion? Or I missed something?
From a telephone conversation with Peter, I do not remember raising this issue (although this is not essential as these issues are discussed again, as here, the whole world, rather than by phone).

29.05.2016 21:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, read the first paragraph of the message Peter 28/05/2016 19:13. There I am. Subject as private.

29.05.2016 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, the theme actually appeared 01.02.2011, at 20:11))
And the list of participants who take part in this action is, in the first post (you are not there).
"Petr Khramov, 01.02.2011 20:11
So here we Gauvreau that it needs a private discussion.List of users who can view this topic:
Alexander Zhakov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov Stanislav Korb, Irina Nikulina, Dmitry Pozhogin, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Petr Khramov. All other users of the site, whether registered or not, the subject can not see. In the future, a list of people with access can increase ( As usual, all obsuzhdaemo ) . "
It is strange why you suddenly see it :)
Peter, I think this issue needs to be a clarification. Subject ceased to be private?
How many people here still have secret access but declared in the header post?

29.05.2016 21:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Konstantin, you actually hatched sawfly interesting! =)
It would be quite remarkable even tighter crop the photos to your subject can easily be found on the frame. Of course, if, for example, the butterfly sits on a beautiful flower - it makes sense to leave a flower in the frame.If the picture was taken on a wall or table - trim the edges so that only the object of shooting left in the frame.
Also on the site are not welcome in the frame line. The size of the instance, you can specify always in the "comments the author."

29.05.2016 20:53, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes there is a genus in the cabbage rolls appeared ... http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/633850

29.05.2016 20:50, Shamil Murtazin:

There was a run on the site - like a hawk moth picture download. I look automatically updates. And then there was official theme =) So, I answer only now.
In general, I like that the site develops.I also realize that my enthusiasm for this plan has more to do with the fact that my work on the site do not occur very major changes, or I have not encountered major problems (and I do not expect adding any desired function).
At the same time, the constant changes in the functional strengths, in domain names, etc.is clearly not going to benefit by using the website "untrained" people.
on the merits.
It is difficult to be against changes that add functionality and make the site more convenient. "Parade" and "rough" tree taxa - a great idea. Search engine - also excellent.It is difficult here something to say against, especially as it is unclear how it will all be in reality. And I like a very neutral attitude to all this, as well as Eugene.
added separately
I think it would be right to leave our "old" domain names. As such lepidoptera.ru/pro, leave there permanent filtration mode Lepidopter'a - let them work.Maybe worth a search engine and display separately from the site. Still, single-minded focus of the site - it is not always a bad thing.
And yet, as I imagine bad until the end will look like the future site - it's difficult to have anything to offer, it is difficult to express his assessment.

29.05.2016 20:42, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Cow came to butterflies: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1000954

29.05.2016 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I would have written, but just do not want to mate. Tired already experiments.
One thing I know: the previously conceived to be done in the first place. And once taken it will be done for innovations.
IMHO sequence of the site you want.

29.05.2016 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Troides aeacus / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

29.05.2016 18:33, Peter Khramov:

Citizens who do not write anything? And the letters sent out, and on the website, look, have already visited. And only one said Eugene.

29.05.2016 18:12, Alex Dumchus:

Troides aeacus, male

29.05.2016 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, and it is necessary to correct the date.
May the court, however))

29.05.2016 17:56, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Something point on the map can not install .......

29.05.2016 16:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All that is in my gallery - and then in the collections. Separately, as instances do not download anything.
Here is the photo that should be on the page that yesterday I brought as an example: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/41651

29.05.2016 15:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Continuing the theme! =) From yesterday night fishing. I noticed that revelers very comfortable with the transition to the hand (when he calmed down and sat down on the screen). As a result, the plurality of duplicates - desired frame has been received. And as revelers were several kinds, the figure was slightly modernized =)

29.05.2016 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Where there is no prevyuh, there you through their foty loaded separately or specifically as ezemplyary?

29.05.2016 13:20, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.
Okay, let it be Tyta luctuosa.

29.05.2016 13:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Why not? Typical Tyta luctuosa.

29.05.2016 13:01, Evgeny Komarov:

OK!

29.05.2016 12:37, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, yes, there are restrictions on indexing sites plus the ability to filter data during the selection of the site plus prostanovka labels Trusted / Untrusted at both sites, and at the level of individual materials.As a result, I think it will not be garbage, but to rake millions of data is optional (because they have at least once dismantled on the resources from where they are taken). Those. minimum objective - is the label for each site, and it is quite doable.

29.05.2016 9:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, I still sit at home - the weather somehow does not contribute, plus went midge is not childish - a reluctance to feed her, and then another, and retouch photos with a bunch of bloodsuckers caught in the frame :).
The proposed changes do lead to the fact that we will have a completely different site. Honestly, I can not make any positive or negative opinion.While I sfrmirovalos this: our "core fighting" to put it mildly not cope with what we have. When a search engine downloads a multi-million images from the network, how it is going to rake? Whatever it was, but a lot of "garbage" on the network or five or 25 people do not filter out.On the one true definition of accounting for several hundred erroneous network. Yes, once the network connection resources will dramatically increase the information content of the site. This is indisputable.But is it at the same time will not turn into a kind of "dump"? Or provide a serious limitation of resources, which will take the information? If so, then perhaps my fears are smaller :)
It is a pure reflection on a given topic. I want to hear the views of others!

28.05.2016 19:13, Peter Khramov:

A large discussion of present and future site


There are a few ideas for the site, which offer discussion to start within the system area among our customers combat the kernel (remember, this is in alphabetical order, Alexander Zhakov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Yevgeny Komarov, Shamil Murtazin, Irina Nikulina, Dmitry Pozhogin,Vasiliy Feoktistov). I phoned all previously on this subject, so I will describe here / duplicates before progovorennoe, and let's discuss what and how.

tree taxa:
1. Make of conventional multitrees. Those. one species, for example, may refer to several tribes.Multitrees created programmatically based on the data available in the web. Use it only to find multitrees, snapping photos and descriptions, and so on. D. Outward (see Classification) does not explicitly show.
2. Classification display only the part of the tree that is checked / edited by the curators.Curator paced the taxon, stamped "no mines" - send in the open access. Of course, without the "Multi".
Result: people only see the tree in its pure, proven parts and therefore do not get scared and do not form a negative impression of the site.In this case all the advantages crooked multitrees used in locating and attaching the information to taxa.

Photos:
Integrate search results on other sites (see. Test version http://ist.insecta.pro) gallery site. At the same time for external sources, we will only store prevyuhi (like Yandex.Pictures), and larger image - will not. But they can be disclosed (again, as Yandex) and navigate to the source. Plus, unlike Yandex, they can comment on and edit their binding to taxa (as it is now for our photos).At the same time the need for the gallery in the classic sense, it is not going away as Georgia foty and ship further.
Result: a very large increase in the number of photos and taxa that they illustrate. Specific essays and descriptions of taxa:
Integrate the results of the search text (as long as there is not even a test version) in site descriptions. Similarly, the photos, but more focused on the citation (the volume of the publication of information from external sources (not just links to them) are discussed).Result: a very large increase in the number of taxa with the description, as well as the scope of the existing definitions.

Optional №1:
Expandable search capabilities enable robots to search for videos on the collector / copies sold, according to geographical location and so on. Optional №2:
In the process of search engine were signals from people in neighboring subjects (ne_entomologicheskoy Zoology, Botany), that they too would like to try a search in their respective fields.As a result, now the search engine included (and still in the process of inclusion) photos of other living organisms (not insects), but does not work the tree for them (ie, take away all the sailing is possible, and all wild animals -.. Can not, can only be on specific titles ).While working on this case, I did not see a fundamental difference in the search algorithms for insects and other organisms, so do not watch, and obstacles to the inclusion of other organisms (including multitrees for them) to search on a permanent basis. Optional №3:
In the transition to a more "exploratory" look, the site will become less "home". Those. it is virtually impossible to cast a single glance from the bird's-eye view and know every corner. But. It was difficult at the stage of Lepidoptera and absolutely nothing - on the stage of the insects.Therefore, I believe that, compared with the insects in this sense, the changes will not be as noticeable. Summary:
If you do everything as described above, we get a much updated (almost new) site that will need a new domain and include data Sea (mostly, search) for a variety of living organisms with a more competent,than it is now, and the structure of the system of information cutoffs unnecessary (as it is now done on the units and other taxa level in user preferences), which will be in great need of tutors / moderators / administrators, but will remain fully operational and in their moments bezdeystvpiya.

Let's discuss.



PS.Maybe this site will again hang on two separate domains, something we really became bad with foreigners (hodyut walk, but do not take an active part).
PPS. Dmitry Pozhogin today without the Internet, Alexander Zhakov collected in the field, therefore, probably, their comments will be later.

28.05.2016 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea leuconoe Idea leuconoe clara.

28.05.2016 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea leuconoe Idea leuconoe princesa.

28.05.2016 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea leuconoe Idea leuconoe princesa.

28.05.2016 17:16, Igor Ivannikov:

Idea leuconoe clara

28.05.2016 17:10, Igor Ivannikov:

Idea leuconoe princesa

28.05.2016 17:04, Igor Ivannikov:

Idea leuconoe princesa

28.05.2016 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.05.2016 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.05.2016 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No previews were some that were previously there, and link them to a photo no.
Example: http://insecta.pro/ru/specimen/901
Only that one beetle-back added: This turned out to previews.
P.S. And we must do to buttons disappear if the photos have been added to the collection. And it remains in place and confusing.

28.05.2016 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Restored. Try it now.

28.05.2016 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Basil, just need refund, any problem. There is only the interface sedated, and everything else is normal.

28.05.2016 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I use from time to time .. And then there are people from the site. Do not the people?
Then get nafig this leading to nowhere button to keep your eyes calluses.
I will continue to use the offline prog. Pick-only normal. In online longer leg.

28.05.2016 0:52, Peter Khramov:

People do not use.

27.05.2016 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why not go? What's wrong?

27.05.2016 21:29, Peter Khramov:

I do not went to a section that's what happened to him.

27.05.2016 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What is this section for? Does not work ((
Button under each picture I present. And the section does not appear here at this address: http://insecta.pro/ru/specimen

27.05.2016 16:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The old one species that does not confuse anyone: http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/Oedecnema-Dejean-1835
And this is its synonym :)

27.05.2016 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Oedecnema gebleri / Male.

27.05.2016 16:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Oedecnema dubia F? In the database there.

27.05.2016 11:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia w-latinum / Andrey Ponomarev Lacanobia thalassina / Basil Sergienko.

27.05.2016 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Vlad Proklov Lacanobia suasa / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2016 20:14, Peter Khramov:

Well, a train psychology. There aschuchenie presence of a pair of outstanding issues of global, and without them, and less difficult to translate global. But right now, already it seems to be poponyatnee everything was ...

26.05.2016 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But no panic and no.
You just have to do at the end of it all long ago and vital obgovorёnnoe :)

26.05.2016 13:32, Peter Khramov:

Do not panic!) Make and karabid and subspecies.

26.05.2016 12:11, Evgeny Komarov:

No, of course :) In my opinion, Peter, not before.

26.05.2016 12:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia lucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.05.2016 12:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia lucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.05.2016 12:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia lucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.05.2016 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, and perhaps today the curators can already work with the subspecies?
In my opinion there is still no such possibility (at least for me) (
Actually therefore raised the question :)

25.05.2016 22:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! I absolutely am not going to do anything with subspecies Carabus, especially in view of the serious discrepancies between the treatment of the Zoological and carabidae.org even subgenera level. Moreover, more serious work above the roof. I was waiting for the promised Peter export carabidae.org, but it looks quite delayed indefinitely.I would be handled, but now the field season, which take time.

25.05.2016 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Carabus granulatus Carabus granulatus granulatus.

25.05.2016 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I determined the corrected :)
If properly I think this is Carabus (Carabus) granulatus telluris Bates, 1883 : http://carabidae.org/taxa/granulatus-telluris-bates-1883
Either Carabus (Carabus) granulatus yezoensis Bates, 1883 : http://carabidae.org/taxa/granulatus-yezoensis-bates-1883
List subspecies with their ranges can be found here: http://carabidae.org/taxa/granulatus-linne-1758
That's me to the fact that the basis of the two subspecies and no wrong with this (as with many others) to do something .....

25.05.2016 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov.

25.05.2016 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

25.05.2016 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

25.05.2016 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

25.05.2016 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

25.05.2016 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

25.05.2016 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

25.05.2016 16:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Evergestis frumentalis / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

25.05.2016 15:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.05.2016 15:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.05.2016 14:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Malachius bipustulatus / Tentatively identified / Imago / Ivan Pristrem Clanoptilus / Confidently identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

25.05.2016 13:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Misolampidius tentyrioides / Evgeny Komarov.

25.05.2016 12:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Misolampidius tentyrioides / Evgeny Komarov.

25.05.2016 12:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Misolampidius tentyrioides Sols, 1875 -. Not in the database. add
.

25.05.2016 10:10, Fedor Ovechkin:

larva

25.05.2016 10:09, Fedor Ovechkin:

larva

25.05.2016 10:09, Fedor Ovechkin:

larva

25.05.2016 10:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

larva

25.05.2016 10:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

larva

25.05.2016 10:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

larva

25.05.2016 9:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Xanthorhoe biriviata (Borkhausen, 1794)

25.05.2016 6:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tenebrionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Tentyria nomas / Evgeny Komarov.

25.05.2016 6:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tenebrionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Tentyria nomas / Evgeny Komarov.

24.05.2016 21:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Carabus granulatus / Female / .

24.05.2016 21:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Carabus granulatus / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

24.05.2016 16:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

24.05.2016 16:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

24.05.2016 0:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Et it is necessary zaregatsya :)
Until the moment of this writing in the comment)))

23.05.2016 23:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Remains to be determined to finish =)

23.05.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now everything has come together :)

23.05.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Larinus vulpes / Shamil Murtazin.

23.05.2016 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Larinus vulpes / Shamil Murtazin.

23.05.2016 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Larinus vulpes / Shamil Murtazin.

23.05.2016 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Foucartia squamulata / Shamil Murtazin.

23.05.2016 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Foucartia squamulata / Shamil Murtazin.

23.05.2016 20:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Here pervoopisatel not converge

23.05.2016 20:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Here, too, does not converge pervoopisatel

23.05.2016 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Alex Lender Myzia oblongoguttata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.05.2016 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Alex Lender Myzia oblongoguttata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.05.2016 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Checkered it ..
It happens :)

23.05.2016 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Alex Lender Anatis ocellata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.05.2016 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Alex Lender Anatis ocellata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.05.2016 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tenebrionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.05.2016 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tenebrionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.05.2016 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Pissodes castaneus / Shamil Murtazin.

23.05.2016 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Pissodes castaneus / Shamil Murtazin.

23.05.2016 12:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Now it called Volucella bivitta. Earlier, in the Russian Far East Opredelitel insect was called V. coreana.

23.05.2016 1:05, Peter Khramov:

Added a tree (from insects). Now, if you enter the query "Papilionidae", will be displayed not only photos, butterfly which opredelnie to this family, but foty with butterflies all child taxa (of those that exist in the tree). As soon as the tree from insects, then it works only for insects. Trying tree can be on the order level and below.Added a few thousand British and Russian names, which is now also possible to search for.

22.05.2016 21:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Please comment bavy it or not =)
Photography is far from perfect ...

22.05.2016 20:53, Shamil Murtazin:

I'm sorry, of course, that's not it ... Missed a photo =)

22.05.2016 18:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, try a different browser, and / or reinstall / upgrade your. Most likely, in the software "dog fumbled" =)

22.05.2016 18:45, Peter Khramov:

I've even tried by Vivaldi: -)

22.05.2016 18:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Everything works. Of Firefox.

22.05.2016 18:21, Peter Khramov:

Very strange. I tried and at the Opera, and the Opera, all the rules opens. It is possible to try the same thing in Opera Turbo mode and in which the thread alternative browser?

22.05.2016 17:34, Alexander Belousov:

http://ist.insecta.pro/?cap=Aporia+leucodice&geof=&geos=

22.05.2016 15:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Dorcadion glicyrrhizae?

22.05.2016 15:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Pervoopisateli not agree, did not put the form.

22.05.2016 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, reset link on the search results and see what's wrong. We must show all 28 and, by itself, should all be active.

22.05.2016 12:18, Alexander Belousov:

I tried to search. Found 28 images, but images of all 10 shows. No matter how hard he tried. Although when it updates the page pop-up images and other, but then go off. And the pictures themselves must be active? When you click on them nothing happens. (Opera browser).

22.05.2016 2:25, Peter Khramov:

1. At the moment, indexed and searchable ~ 2.400.000 photos.
2. Search is now possible not only for the full title, but also a brief (and will work Papilio machaon, and machaon).
3. Conclusion prevyuh became somewhat less by weight.

Trees, too, will soon connect (only for insects).

22.05.2016 0:07, Shamil Murtazin:

I added a picture from above.

20.05.2016 17:25, Shamil Murtazin:

There is a picture from above. I added later.

20.05.2016 16:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia lucida / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.05.2016 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Evergestis frumentalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.05.2016 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Evergestis frumentalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.05.2016 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pleurota pyropella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.05.2016 15:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pleurota pyropella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.05.2016 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm talking about the fact that you are completely in the theme, and I look at pictures from Kononenko :)

20.05.2016 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lygephila vulcanea / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov Lygephila lupina / Confidently identified / Oleg Pekarsky.

20.05.2016 13:13, Oleg Pekarsky:

I believe that in this photo lupina. On account of the fact that I "certainly know better" - any day out my new article on vulcanea-group in which the issues of these two closely related species, detail and understands all the vicissitudes of nomenclature associated with them. Let's see, discuss :)

20.05.2016 12:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Moved to inaccurate or transfer to Lygephila lupina ? Oleg, you certainly know better, but I have this look, even as an option not considered. :)

20.05.2016 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

20.05.2016 10:45, Oleg Pekarsky:

For a number of signs that instance should be defined as lupina (= mirabilis).

19.05.2016 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Fixed a bug when foty with Insectoids, who did not have a major version (only 320) is not displayed in the search.

19.05.2016 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Now, on the page of each author are displayed on the number of photos uploaded to them and taxa to them, as well as on the number of comments. All this is with reference to the gallery and the community, of its own accord.

19.05.2016 17:47, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the site hosting the foty a portion of the photons are reference curves. Those. the site itself does not seem to know that they are curves. And the robot has not yet been able to determine this. But gradually we teach.
ZY And so glaring problem - because we do not store prevyuhi. But this is temporary.In the standard mode of operation is similar to Yandex / google - prevyuhi store at home, for polnorazmerom helmet on site.

19.05.2016 16:54, Ivan Pristrem:

I found another bug brutal. On request Phlebodes confixa entire collection just empty, without a photo. I think here it is necessary to improve the program itself, which is the image index.

19.05.2016 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

19.05.2016 16:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Crambidae Omiodes tristrialis.

19.05.2016 12:05, Peter Khramov:

And the right size: -)

19.05.2016 11:15, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the paired photons and all indications floor - yes, there was a glitch with the map now fixed.

19.05.2016 11:04, Peter Khramov:

That is it we like to separate from the site will be?
No, it will be combined, just a temporary version of the test would be correct to do is independent.

19.05.2016 10:44, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha can be transferred to the form. Yesterday this photo VA Kirpichnikova already received a reply confirming the determination.

19.05.2016 10:02, Alexander Belousov:

Straight kiwi bird!

19.05.2016 9:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, check at the specimen. though on the green Tomiki. Something I doubt that it glandium!

19.05.2016 8:54, Ivan Pristrem:

The selection does not always work. Search by name Cicindela campestris species and geography (introduced their area) - it's gone. And when I tried to find them paired pictures - got an empty result, even though I have two pair of mating and there pointed out that this is a pair.

19.05.2016 8:47, Ivan Pristrem:

That is, it is as if we separate from the site will be?

19.05.2016 1:45, Peter Khramov:

1. Search engine moved to a new address: http://ist.insecta.pro .
2. Now it is possible for the selection, on the floor of the stage, in terms of accuracy (but keep in mind that the values ​​of the corresponding properties are listed is not for all images).
3. The selection of the geography of the second field appeared. Now you can select on the basis of "or."For example, "ekaterinburg" or "Sverdlovsk".
4. The updated interface with pop-up windows and using / reference for each item, as well as for the page as a whole (see. Question marks in the circles).
5. "including unknown" can be assigned to a property in the parameters.For example, you can select photos and pictures of males, for whom sex is not specified, but you can select photos males ONLY.
6. The minimum length of a request for names of taxa, and geography - 3 characters.
7. In the absence of a request for the page displays a random selection of photos.

18.05.2016 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

I know its bad, a lot of similar types and many kinds of interpretation. Far East you easier, and I doubt :)

18.05.2016 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nymphalidae / Imago Argynnis anadyomene / Female.

18.05.2016 18:39, Irina Nikulina:

And what are confused, Sash? It has long wanted to write here to support Yurino definition forget (reconsidered the entire family, all females, no one else with the top like and do not. Ruslan and pafiya others. For females andiomeny characterized by a vast dark pattern and a white spot at the apex in the background shading. True , AIKurentsov even denied the existence of Argynnis anadyomene on WFD relating to the mind only all Japanese ind., And refers to the Ussuri Argynnis ella, ella but now give a subspecies anadyomene spread in Primorye and the Amur region. Here the picture is not bad http://rusinsects.com/nymph/na-anad.htm, and in view of the Asian sites is often in others. Kind Nephargynnis anadyomene http://web1.kcn.jp/tyoutyou/kumogatahi.html, http : //museum-database.shimane-u.ac.jp/specimen/metadata/4921. Have a look, please.

18.05.2016 12:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notodontidae / Alexey Perelygin Neodaruma tamanukii / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.05.2016 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notodontidae / Alexey Perelygin Neodaruma tamanukii / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.05.2016 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notodontidae / Alexey Perelygin Neodaruma tamanukii / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.05.2016 12:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is not Corydalis and sovkovidka. Neodaruma tamanukii. Valid for Kamchatka at the Sineva omitted.

18.05.2016 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.05.2016 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Antheraea mezops.

18.05.2016 12:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Antheraea mezops.

18.05.2016 12:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Alex Dumchus.

18.05.2016 12:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Alex Dumchus.

18.05.2016 11:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Salassa fansipana.

18.05.2016 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Salassa fansipana.

18.05.2016 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Salassa tonkiniana / Male.

18.05.2016 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Salassa tonkiniana.

18.05.2016 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

18.05.2016 11:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

18.05.2016 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Saturnia lesoudieri.

18.05.2016 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Saturnia lesoudieri.

18.05.2016 11:34, Yuri Semejkin:

.- Vasiliy Feoktistov, 09/06/2014 22:20
How do you feel about that? ...... I for the fact that if all ukazyvat.gde tselesoobrazno.Dazhe formally renounced.

18.05.2016 10:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Saturnia Saturnia anna.

18.05.2016 10:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Saturnia Saturnia anna.

18.05.2016 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

You, Vasily rights, given the present state of affairs, we must as far as possible to scatter on troops at least. About the fact that you write :) I looked, but I did not like the definition and on until I left as is,
no peeking, that the definitions do not exist. If there is any doubt to determine the order. :))

18.05.2016 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambidae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.05.2016 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nymphalidae.

18.05.2016 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

18.05.2016 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.05.2016 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.05.2016 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Aspitates ochrearia / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.05.2016 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Aspitates ochrearia / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.05.2016 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I just pulled it out of the total Thaler uncertain based on the author's comments and all))
At the moment, there are a couple of photos of butterflies with long suggested (did not touch)
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55498
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55472
Must-have all moderators sometimes to look at your leisure :)

18.05.2016 9:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you know something? or you use the definition of the image of the author? I have this kind of Schintlmeister. 2008 is not found (of course, can badly searched). Thus, to a family that is hardly correctly. rather something of a scoop in a broad sense, including volnyanok. With such views, new to the region, we must be careful. :)

18.05.2016 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No need for any links: the question is, is-whether it is specified in the top line :)
I believe that it is necessary to specify if it is possible.
Shape, aberration variations etc. They are not tasonomicheskimi units. It's just a deviation from the template.
The example of the same conventional Trichius fasciatus can not do without their guidance in any way.

Examples of how this should be indicated:
aberrations:
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/22814
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/49878
Variation:
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46425
Form (seasonal):
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/2911

18.05.2016 6:47, Ivan Pristrem:

It is necessary to specify. But only so that, if anything, a link from a photo of this subspecies / forms / aberrations led to the page of the form, and not in the empty space, like we have here often happened and happens still.

17.05.2016 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While he placed in the genus. It is necessary to make an appearance, but I can not.

17.05.2016 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturnia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.05.2016 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturnia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.05.2016 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.05.2016 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.05.2016 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notodontidae / Confidently identified / Alexey Perelygin.

17.05.2016 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notodontidae / Confidently identified / Alexey Perelygin.

17.05.2016 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notodontidae / Confidently identified / Alexey Perelygin.

17.05.2016 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also comes in handy a little :)
"Elateridae of the Caribbean & Atlantic Islands and Southern North America and South America" ​​: https://www.sdstate.edu/ps/Severin-McDaniel/project-elater/caribbean-atlantic-southernnorthamerica/

17.05.2016 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elateridae Tomicephalus substriatus.

17.05.2016 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elateridae Tomicephalus substriatus.

17.05.2016 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Elateridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.05.2016 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shirley Sekarajasingham Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.05.2016 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera Elateridae.

17.05.2016 14:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tenebrio Neatus picipes.

17.05.2016 14:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tenebrio Neatus picipes.

17.05.2016 14:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tenebrio Neatus picipes.

17.05.2016 14:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Tenebrio / Evgeny Komarov.

17.05.2016 14:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Tenebrio / Evgeny Komarov.

17.05.2016 14:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Tenebrio / Evgeny Komarov.

16.05.2016 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it's hard to do.

16.05.2016 18:28, Ivan Pristrem:

In Yandex you can not just go to the page with the image, but also to go to the image itself, and our search engine is doing only the first.Add to the future second clearly makes sense - to view the photo will be more convenient (especially if the source photos are sandwiched into small frames with a large size of the property in the Carabidae of the World), or if you want to quickly scan a lot of photos from different sites (for scientists faster and easier -.. the better, that is, to save time).Especially because this feature is available in all top search engines. More precisely, it is all I know of the search engines.

16.05.2016 15:38, Peter Khramov:

Sort and filter these parameters will, yes.
Commenting / definition will be too.
The date / time the robot collects now, but the data is not as much as geography. But we will also publish.
Now about and so it made as to Yandex. If polnorazmer more - and Yandex, and we refer to the source.Undefined - yes, in the future it is possible, but it is of secondary importance compared to the accurate collection of data that is defined.
About clones - by itself, will be adjusted. But this is when we will be on site at least the image preview (both on the same Yandeksegugle). Now we do not store any sort of graphic data.
With glitches - I know. Repaired.

16.05.2016 8:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Erynnis montanus / Yuri Semejkin.

16.05.2016 8:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lycoperdininae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Spathomeles retiarius / Evgeny Komarov.

16.05.2016 8:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lycoperdininae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Spathomeles retiarius / Evgeny Komarov.

16.05.2016 7:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Erynnis montanus (Bremer, 1861)

16.05.2016 7:02, Ivan Pristrem:

I found a bug here: http://insecta.pro/ru/is?cap=&geo=Бразилия
There are some images are not displayed when you try to view the site gives the following: "The requested content can not be loaded Please try again later.." In this case the source is working. And, most interestingly, all the photos that can not be loaded, from our website, with photos of other sites all right.

15.05.2016 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Silphidae / Alex Lender Phosphuga atrata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.05.2016 16:08, Ivan Pristrem:

Yes. And another problem: photos clones. If picture author lecturing their creations on the two sites, and more, in a search engine, they are displayed all. I think in the future will need to do both on Yandex - where all clones are automatically grouped and displayed in the search engines in a single copy.Only this will require a special program that will recognize these clones. And, perhaps, a more powerful server.

15.05.2016 15:29, Ivan Pristrem:

More can be added here is altogether uncertain picture. Because sometimes these stories happen ... here recently described a new kind of dragonfly. We found it by accident while watching a movie. http://www.naturalis.nl/en/news/onderzoek/dragonfly-sir-david-90. And most interesting is that it is - the most natural there the trivial, and the Internet has plenty of her photo hung long before that.But they had never noticed because they are placed anywhere, anyhow, and, of course, no one tried to identify them, so to them it was almost impossible to get to the bottom. If all this chaos to order using our search engine, the search for a new kind of photo will be much easier.

15.05.2016 15:13, Ivan Pristrem:

Hmmm ... This is all very interesting ... nothing like I have not seen. Finder at this stage shows good results, although the interface is underfulfilled. In the future, it is worth adding the following things:
- The possibility of sorting the image size, sources, by type, on the accuracy of the determination at step / floor.- Ability to change the definition of photography as part of our server (if it turns out that there is, on the site, incorrect definition). That is, on the site it will remain the same, and in a search engine we have, it will be listed under the true, from our point of view, the definition.
- Ability to comment on the photo.- Date / Time Auto Substitute (according to the data from the website or from the photo properties, and in the priority should be the dating site, because if it is a photo of collection specimen, made in the winter of chamber conditions, naturally, in the properties of the photo will be designated date created file and not the date of the capture of an insect.- Ability to view full-size image, like in Yandex (after the introduction of full-size view directly on our website).

15.05.2016 14:49, Shamil Murtazin:

I'm sorry, apparently accidentally dropped a box =)

15.05.2016 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, it is desirable to indicate which identified and who defined. :)

15.05.2016 13:50, Alexey Perelygin: This species is identified correctly.

15.05.2016 13:49, Peter Khramov:

And further. I recall. Tree taxa currently is is ignored. Those. upon request, for example, there are only tribe foty defined to this tribe, but not all child foty taxa of the tribe!

15.05.2016 13:44, Peter Khramov:

Yes, crayfish there too, that's fine: -) tips on the search page will do. Link to this page origialnuyu have mandatory under each photo (zoom in and see the description below).
Yes another. Somewhere given geography in Russian, somewhere in the English somewhere in both. Consider the search (especially in foreign locations).

15.05.2016 13:42, Evgeny Komarov:

That's very good! Erotylidae & Endomychidae http://marelune.yvinec.free.fr/?lang=en

15.05.2016 13:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Looking at the gallery and selecting a stage "adults" - ignored "male", "female", well, etc. In terms of databases all true of course, but logically wrong =)

15.05.2016 12:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Works, geography, too. The issue there are also some plants, and other members, such as cancers =) Well, again, I remind you that all vyshenapisannoe as a hint should be somewhere on the same page of the search place. For many nuances; himself search activity rather "creative")
I would still like to see a link to the original page.As long as I get there I can not. Visible to photograph.

15.05.2016 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Lord, to test a preliminary version of the image search: http://ist.insecta.pro
Who is looking at ~ 750,000 photos. Soon we will add the same amount.
Remarks:
1. This is not a gallery. It is the search for the pictures stored on various websites (including on the insects).
2. Now without looking tree taxa and without synonyms.In name only as they are in a photo. Those. OK, you can look on the subspecies, species and genera.
3. When searching for the name of the form must be entered along with the family.
4. The sample pictures in the lower right corner of some images are icons - it's half the individual / individuals and the question mark, if the definition is in doubt.
5.Clicking on Fautua it increases, there is more information about it and a link where you can go to the page where it is located.
6. An increase in ph can browse them using the arrows or prevyuh in the bottom of the screen.
7. Pay attention to the number of results (they beat by 30 pcs. On page in large samples).
8.Who mobile internet - now this thing is pretty zhruschey traffic since in trial prevyuhi actually larger than they appear on the site.
Examples of valid requests in taxa:
Papilio - show all species and subspecies of Papilio, and foty identified to genus / subgenus of Papilio.
Papilio ma - all show that begins at Papilio ma, including swallowtail. Pap - all show that starts on the Pap.
In geography can enter anything you want. Unlike taxa, there is no search mask request *, and mask * Request *. In addition, you can search just all foty any taxa for a given location (enter a query only in the field of geography, but not of a taxon).Example: You can enter in geography "nizhegor" , to try and find you are interested in foty taxon of the Nizhny Novgorod region.

Geography is not specified for all images.
The first page autosubstitution will work, but are not necessary to use (as opposed to other fields on the site). On the page with fotami avtopodstanovok will not.I am waiting for your commentary, that ponra that not ponra.

ZY The project is interesting and specialists for other groups (not only for insects), so gradually add other organisms in the search.

14.05.2016 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When bringing to the subspecies, in those cases when it is determined to species, determined the surname did not seem to change?
To lose ....

14.05.2016 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea blanchardii Idea blanchardii munaensis.

14.05.2016 19:52, Igor Ivannikov:

munaensis

14.05.2016 16:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Celastrina ladonides ?

14.05.2016 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Samia Samia kohlli.

14.05.2016 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Loepa Loepa diversiocellata.

14.05.2016 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Loepa Loepa diversiocellata.

14.05.2016 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Samia Samia kohlli.

14.05.2016 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Samia Samia kohlli.

14.05.2016 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Gnathothlibus erotus / Alex Dumchus.

14.05.2016 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Gnathothlibus erotus / Alex Dumchus.

14.05.2016 9:14, Alex Dumchus:

Saturnia thibeta, (Westwood, 1853)

14.05.2016 9:07, Alex Dumchus:

Gnathothlibus erotus, (Cramer, 1777)

14.05.2016 9:02, Alex Dumchus:

Achelura bani

14.05.2016 9:00, Alex Dumchus:

Samia kohlli, Naumann & Peigler, 2001

14.05.2016 8:58, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa diversiocellata, Bryck, 1944

14.05.2016 8:44, Alex Dumchus:

Samia kohlli ,Naumann & Peigler, 2001

13.05.2016 17:42, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!

13.05.2016 17:41, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!

13.05.2016 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Myelois circumvoluta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.05.2016 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nomophila noctuella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.05.2016 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nomophila noctuella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.05.2016 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Loepa Loepa anthera.

12.05.2016 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Loepa Loepa anthera.

12.05.2016 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Loepa Loepa sikkima.

12.05.2016 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Loepa / Vasiliy Feoktistov Loepa diversiocellata / Alex Dumchus.

12.05.2016 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Loepa / Vasiliy Feoktistov Loepa diversiocellata / Alex Dumchus.

12.05.2016 17:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, it is better not to move to the exact C. ladonides.
And as http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/29138, I do not see any reason to transfer pictures and believe in the true definition of inaccurate looked. By the way the name of this butterfly has undergone a series of metamorphoses Celastrina sugitanii (Matsumura, 1919). C. sugitanii phellodendron M. M. Omelko, 1987 = C. phellodendron M. M. Omelko, 1987

12.05.2016 16:36, Irina Nikulina:

I would say that this is just the top characteristic of the male C. ladonides. And the network has an image, for example http://catocala.narod.ru/lyc0175.html and http://www.lycaenidae.gmxhome.de/Lycaenopsis/Celastrina/celastrina-index.htm would put rather inaccurate to ladonidam. But the differences of male and ladonidy Barkhatova somehow end up not all clear ladonida brighter, pogolubee boundary blackout in a clear apex more than the Barkhatova http://szmn.sbras.ru/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Celastrina_phellodendroni.htm, but I would not risk to these types in the exact place. By the way, here it is necessary to http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/29138 inaccurate move, then it, too, was not the exact, complex these Celastrina)

12.05.2016 13:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pseudanostirus Pseudanostirus ecarinatus.

12.05.2016 13:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Out of the base. Pseudanostirus ecarinatus (Stepanov, 1930)

12.05.2016 10:25, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa anthera ,Jordan, 1911

12.05.2016 10:24, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa sikkima ,Atkinson in Moore, 1866

12.05.2016 10:23, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa diversiocellata ,Bryck, 1944

12.05.2016 3:29, Yuri Semejkin:

It would be necessary to look more for C. ladonides? The truth at C. ladonides no such top as pictured in the figure. I at least could not be found in the internet. So speak up ....

12.05.2016 0:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysididae Chrysura dichroa.

12.05.2016 0:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysididae Chrysura dichroa.

11.05.2016 21:22, Evgeny Komarov:

All very simple - do not notice in the sample of the cocoon (chrysalis), and then the larva, somewhere inside bundles of spinach, from which, after raising the temperature butterfly and left - inspect something only a few samples from imported batches. Maybe in the selected sample, and there was nothing. The rate of sampling in the inspection of cabbage for example, one with a fork truck.Banal case for working in the quarantine service to inspect plants and imports. Here here recently frog jumped from the cabbage, received in Russia and ... I will not write to :) And larvae, that's fine :)

11.05.2016 18:10, Ivan Pristrem:

Ubaldennaya butterfly

11.05.2016 15:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Alex Lender Byturus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.05.2016 15:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Alex Lender Pterostichus melanarius / Evgeny Komarov.

10.05.2016 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cetoniini / Alex Lender Cetonia aurata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.05.2016 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subspecies can finish your hands (no subspecies of the form page).

10.05.2016 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bombus cullumanus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

10.05.2016 10:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Bombus cullumanus serrisquama Morawitz, 1888. http://bombus.nsu.ru/index.php/component/bmb/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5&showgal=gal_serrisquama This site bumblebees. In Russia, they are, as they say on the site 90 species.

09.05.2016 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima salaminia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

09.05.2016 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudocima salaminia / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Loepa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Loepa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.05.2016 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Acronicta rumicis.

09.05.2016 16:24, Alexander Belousov:

They just tame! Soot tweezers, then knocked softly on the abdomen, leveling "system."

09.05.2016 14:11, Shamil Murtazin:

The photo was not mine =) But you got even better. Even sitting exactly on the fingers)

09.05.2016 13:18, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, will not find Old. I have a duplicate fotami otherwise unlikely as it will. Either link under each fotoy sculpt, but it's really quite ...

09.05.2016 12:52, Alexander Belousov:

Serura przewalskyi, svezhevyshedshy. Successfully overwintered in the refrigerator. I accept the baton from Shamil.

09.05.2016 12:11, Alexander Belousov:

08.05.2016 21:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Well, you look a little wider this question. Above I have written is not pure geography and decoding reduce the university and such references that reveal the geographic objects that are used to map the terrain. In particular, it becomes clear that in the experimental forest.All this crowd under each photo - big doubts that it should be done. Geography in its pure form, and now there are under each photo. For example - http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/57342

08.05.2016 20:41, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, you definitely under fotami. We not only have to dance ph (where it was filmed), but also on the search for geography in the free form (which already operates in the gallery). If a separate thread to write, the search will not ...

08.05.2016 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Infa normals. It is the place in the photo in full, and with reference to the original language.
This info is supplied in the " Additional information / remarks. For example, the instance output from the pupae or Determination was carried out on a photo or any other additional information ".I consider it unnecessary and inconvenient imposition of information in this separate topic :)
So will the people jumping between pages with a photo and the topic ......
Why do it? Amenities creates?

08.05.2016 19:04, Shamil Murtazin:

a lot of information under each photo looks monstrously

08.05.2016 17:38, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea mezops, Bryk, 1944

08.05.2016 17:33, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa diversiocellata Bryck, 1944???

08.05.2016 17:23, Alex Dumchus:

Salassa fansipana Brechlin, 1997

08.05.2016 17:22, Alex Dumchus:

Salassa tonkiniana Le Moult, 1933

08.05.2016 17:10, Alex Dumchus:

Saturnia lesoudieri (Le Moult, 1933)

08.05.2016 17:06, Alex Dumchus:

Saturnia anna (Moore 1865)

08.05.2016 17:00, Peter Khramov:

And why not a photo?

08.05.2016 15:13, Shamil Murtazin:

I will try to spread information on the geography here points at which the photographs were taken, spread on the site. In particular, from Shirley Sekarajasingham.
I'd like the edited first post. The following are just a question and answer. All information would be in the first post. Thank you.

1.Northern Brazil, the INPA experimental forest north of Presidente Figuereido, about 100 miles north of Manaus, Camp 41
INPA - Brazilian National Amazonian Research Institute = The Brazilian National Institute of Amazonian Research
The approximate location on guglokarte: http://mushroomobserver.org/location/show_location/2709
Article about experimental forest (in English), where you can see the location of the plots: http://www.nature.com/news/forest-ecology-splinters-of-the-amazon-1.12816

07.05.2016 23:10, Igor Ivannikov:

ssp. gordita ?

07.05.2016 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

06.05.2016 14:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Celastrina ladonides? Small, with a thumb nail. Top of bright blue with a purple tinge.

06.05.2016 7:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Eugene! I put the view from the subspecies, and the transfer did not take place, and changed only the author. Two errors. That's a lot on one shift. :(

06.05.2016 7:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Colias hyale Colias erate.

06.05.2016 7:06, Yuri Semejkin:

This is a natural color element. Gonepteryx aspasia, young butterfly limonnits typical yellow-white-green coloring, and wintered become such a gray-brown-crimson-in-flecked,

06.05.2016 6:21, Ivan Pristrem:

A spot on the wings - it is a natural element of color, or it is something soiled?

06.05.2016 6:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

06.05.2016 6:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.05.2016 6:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander! But if Irene is erate :)

05.05.2016 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Miltochrista calamina / Irina Nikulina.

05.05.2016 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Yuri Semejkin Melanargia epimede / Irina Nikulina.

05.05.2016 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Nacoleia sibirialis / Yuri Semejkin.

05.05.2016 14:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Nacoleia sibirialis / Yuri Semejkin.

05.05.2016 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sorry, of course not. That I was wrong, put some of your definitions, and entered on the machine, your number, not Irene. :(

05.05.2016 13:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! I do not define it ..

05.05.2016 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Calamotropha Crambinae.

05.05.2016 12:33, Irina Nikulina:

Here, I think, rather Chrysoteuchia sp. All 3 of 37 Calamotropha registration and another 3 from nearby - others. But the form is hardly possible - and an uncomfortable angle, and a few closely related species differ only in the genital analysis. Here already wrote http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47065.

05.05.2016 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

05.05.2016 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.05.2016 12:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Calamotropha / Yuri Semejkin.

05.05.2016 12:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Good

05.05.2016 12:16, Yuri Semejkin:

For me, too. Have you ever seen something like that, but now something is not found. And it is necessary to check!

05.05.2016 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Gelechiidae / Yuri Semejkin.

05.05.2016 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Quote is selected. :(
If it is not difficult to send me a page with this kind of book Kirpichnikova what I would have understood. :)

05.05.2016 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

For me, it's a different kind of butterfly.

05.05.2016 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I will try to understand the situation and explain it here in the photo page, although it would be of the form page.
1. Kirpichnikova leads him called Nacoleia sibirialis Milliere, 1879. without question. (I do not have this book, but it would have to be an explanation of the situation sibirialis-maculalis, if there is no such.it is very strange, because-like Kirpichnikova fauna DV 1999 is maculalis, and Catalog Sineva: sibirialis auct. (Nec Milliere, 1879), it is not auct =, and cited as an ...)
If we assume that these are two distinct species. But according to other sources: Lamprosema sibirialis (Millière, 1879)
Synonyms: Stenia sibirialis Millière, 1879; Agrotera fenestralis Christoph, 1881; Nacoleia maculalis South, 1901. And then, Yuri, you're right, the later name goes synonymous.
But there can be exceptions.For example, when the earlier name is considered to be not correct. View transferred in the genus, which already have a view with the same name, then the author who carries it can take a later valid name., Or even give her a new one. :))

05.05.2016 11:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! According to the sign =. . I quote from the book Milliere 1879: 139 (Stenia); South, 1901: 462 (N. maculalis); From the record shows, who, when described, and so put an equal sign, and asked a question.
But independent of these two species or something synonymous?, Hard to say.

05.05.2016 11:38, Irina Nikulina:

Sash, I, too, on this type of question has long been hanging since Sinev in the catalog in the comments to mean N. maculalis written: "The erroneous definition: sibirialis auct (nec Milliere, 1879)."

05.05.2016 11:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, and where did the = sign? As I understand it, these are two distinct species. Now I will try to deal with them.

05.05.2016 10:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Pieris melete? First generation.

05.05.2016 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Lycaena dispar / Female / Irina Nikulina.

05.05.2016 10:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Melitaea sutschana / Female / Irina Nikulina.

05.05.2016 10:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Melitaea ambigua / Irina Nikulina.

05.05.2016 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.05.2016 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.05.2016 0:17, Irina Nikulina:

Argynnis sp. Most likely, the female Argynnis coredippe

04.05.2016 23:56, Peter Khramov:

Robot eats everything, but its task is only a collection of information, not updates on the site. So everything will be the norm.

04.05.2016 23:53, Irina Nikulina:

Brenthis daphne?

04.05.2016 23:05, Irina Nikulina:

Melitaea ambigua

04.05.2016 22:39, Irina Nikulina:

Melitaea sutschana , female

04.05.2016 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On tserambitsid have to play off the robot since the subfamily Lamiinae.
Specifically, with the tribe Desmiphorini: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/842521 (made in part)
But until it has all been done by masturbation :)
In winter, I was struck, and then stopped in anticipation of a robot ....
And in addition: is not desirable that the robot in touch Lamiinae tribe Dorcadiini: http: // insecta.pro / ru / taxonomy / 1032049
This tribe is also ready "turnkey" (hand made) and it should be excluded from the tasks for the robot :)

04.05.2016 13:58, Peter Khramov:

On karabid and tserambitsid incite robot just ... And all for a few days as the photos shall find more million at least, run a trial version of the search engine.

04.05.2016 11:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Gelechiidae. A genus and species it would be necessary to check Faristenia quercivora Ponomarenco, 1991?

04.05.2016 7:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, I have my "two cents" :) Peter, you're the devil knows when the import has promised to base carabidae.org, so as not to do all hands. I braked with masturbation. But ...

04.05.2016 5:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.05.2016 5:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.05.2016 0:48, Yuri Semejkin:

I agree. I thought one thing, and others wrote.

03.05.2016 21:13, Irina Nikulina:

I think it's Miltochrista calamina http://www.jpmoth.org/Arctiidae/Lithosiinae/Miltochrista_calamina.htm

03.05.2016 20:44, Irina Nikulina:

And no female Lycaena dispar ?

03.05.2016 20:19, Irina Nikulina:

I think that here the female Melitaea sutschana

03.05.2016 19:50, Irina Nikulina:

It's not Pieridae. Judging by the black figure, it Melanargia epimede , in halimede it less intense, all narrower sling.

03.05.2016 19:40, Irina Nikulina:

In 37 reg. 5 species of Colias, but hyale absent. I think there male Solias erate poliographus

03.05.2016 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Excuse me, I distracted now crawler for images much.

03.05.2016 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well if you say so :)

03.05.2016 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindela granulata.

03.05.2016 11:29, Alexander Belousov:

Sorry! Cicindela granulata (Gebler, 1843), like the female.

03.05.2016 11:00, Yuri Semejkin:

The site is offered ZIN Atlas determinant SV Pushkin mёrtvoedy beetles (Coleoptera, Silphidae) Russia. In the form of a PDF file. http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/COLEOPTERA/RUS/puspdf15.htm

03.05.2016 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, write that in the view. Then I shall understand and bear :)

03.05.2016 9:26, Alexander Belousov:

People! Who's right? Add the view!

03.05.2016 5:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.05.2016 13:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Exoprosopa minos / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.05.2016 12:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

Exoprosopa minos

02.05.2016 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Hemipenthes morio / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.05.2016 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Hemipenthes morio / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.05.2016 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Hemipenthes morio / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.05.2016 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Hemipenthes morio / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.05.2016 10:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

Hemipenthes morio

02.05.2016 10:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

Hemipenthes morio

02.05.2016 10:22, Fedor Ovechkin:

Hemipenthes morio

02.05.2016 10:22, Fedor Ovechkin:

Hemipenthes morio

02.05.2016 9:16, Alexander Belousov:

Eugene, the answer to the FB.

02.05.2016 7:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Trichoptera Mystacides azureus.

02.05.2016 7:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Trichoptera Mystacides azureus.

02.05.2016 7:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Trichoptera.

02.05.2016 7:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Trichoptera.

02.05.2016 3:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus, 1761)

01.05.2016 23:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander, in order to understand this "beast", prompt: it is larger in size songorica?

01.05.2016 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Anthrax aethiops / Fedor Ovechkin.

01.05.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Anthrax aethiops / Fedor Ovechkin.

01.05.2016 21:15, Fedor Ovechkin:

Anthrax aethiops

01.05.2016 21:15, Fedor Ovechkin:

Anthrax aethiops

01.05.2016 19:34, Igor Sakhno:

Then there were only dandelions, and the beast was sluggish, more on what did not want to stay.

01.05.2016 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Geron krymensis / Fedor Ovechkin.

01.05.2016 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Geron krymensis / Fedor Ovechkin.

01.05.2016 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Ivan Pristrem Geron krymensis / Fedor Ovechkin.

01.05.2016 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.05.2016 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.05.2016 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Utetheisa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.05.2016 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Utetheisa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.05.2016 14:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

Geron krymensis

01.05.2016 14:39, Fedor Ovechkin:

Geron krymensis

01.05.2016 14:39, Fedor Ovechkin:

Geron krymensis

01.05.2016 10:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Calamotropha sp

01.05.2016 1:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Nacoleia sibirialis Milliere, 1879=N. maculalis South, 1901

01.05.2016 1:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Nacoleia sibirialis Milliere, 1879 .Pod this name is listed in the monograph: VA Kirpichnikova Ognёvki fauna of the Far East Russia Vladivostok, Dal'nauka 2009, page 382.
On this site, it somehow goes under the name Nacoleia maculalis South, 1901. But South described it 22 years after Millere description.
Alexander ! Clarifies how to.? There seems to be observed principle.Who first described, and that gives it a name?

30.04.2016 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it's just a priority for me.
On this occasion it is not necessary even to meet and something there to discuss, and you just have to do first.
It has long been overdue, and in my opinion the most relevant :)

30.04.2016 19:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala streckeri / Yuri Semejkin.

30.04.2016 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I'm a bit of that ... Ah, would encounter would be like a thread all the core offline and would discuss that as a yes, but damn, it seems, in any way. Anyway, until next exhibition ...

30.04.2016 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Currently, topical (with my bell):
1) Providing the opportunity to work with curators subspecies.
2) For all have added to the form of the Old enabling it redaktirovativat.
3) On the cards: the provision vozmozmozhnosti mix some photos from one point to another.

30.04.2016 9:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Catocala streckeri Staudinger, 1888

30.04.2016 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well need to work things out already designated curators (ie people who work directly with all this) in this and other topics. Until now, not been solved (
Must-have addressed first of them. And we will certainly talk about the rest later.

30.04.2016 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The site Antheraea imperator (Watson 1913) junior synonym of the species to which the photos transferred.

30.04.2016 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea helferi / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.04.2016 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea helferi / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.04.2016 8:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

29.04.2016 21:01, Peter Khramov:

Citizens interested in your opinion:

There is the impression that, on the demand in the order of sections / functionality on our website are as follows:
1. Gallery.
2. The tree taxa (no longer as a separate, but as a basis for the description page, the same gallery, etc.)
3. Species (quite crooked, and very unevenly taxa, but still).Lags far behind (probably due to the lack of development, rather than due to the fact that no one is interested as such):
4. The catalog with the selection of species on the grounds.
5. Maps.

In addition, the working community - primarily as a service for the Gallery section and page descriptions.

Everything else does not work and is not going to.What do you think, am I right or not?

29.04.2016 19:41, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea imperator (Watson 1913)

29.04.2016 13:57, Peter Khramov:

Thank you for the tip-off, we will check.

29.04.2016 9:32, Yuri Semejkin:

It seems like overwintered what?

29.04.2016 8:23, Ivan Pristrem:

Link to a subspecies of this page will not lead! To get to the page type, it is necessary to allocate the cursor name, copy and paste in the search box. It seems that it was done so that the link to the subspecies led to a page type, but then for some reason does not work!

29.04.2016 7:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rhode's right, but the views ??? In the photo they are virtually determined.

29.04.2016 7:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Nematopogon / Vladimir Deryabin.

28.04.2016 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Basil, from the topic pocherpyvat sources, even for the first test version of the search; -)

28.04.2016 19:29, Ivan Pristrem:

And this someone uses? http://entomology.ru/main_menu/main_page/main_page.htm
This catalog is quite old, have not been tested and there are a lot of dead links, but, nevertheless, a lot of presents on it and good sites.

28.04.2016 19:14, Ivan Pristrem:

The legendary site Diptera: http://www.diptera.info
More small resource for lovers of tropical Coleoptera: https://www.flickr.com/photos/coleoptera-us

28.04.2016 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lord, here, on the site is the theme for the sources that infinitesimal correct: http: // insecta.pro / ru / community / 2328
It was created more than five years ago and updated periodically :)
There are already many sources infa on which accurate and relevant ( "manual selection") :)
If we intended to fence its own image search - something on the links, you can gather a lot of useful things.offtopic:
Peter, by the way the topic is already time to rename: the site has changed, and in fact is irrelevant: "" kit "(various useful links for butterflies " ..
Who will approach: "" kit "(various useful links for insect " :).

28.04.2016 18:14, Ivan Pristrem:

No, of course, and you can add to the list makroid ... But then someone will have to bring it in order for the benefit of our site. To our search engine you can see photos from makroida properly defined.

28.04.2016 15:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diasemia reticularis / Yuri Semejkin.

28.04.2016 15:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Diasemia reticularis (Linnaeus, 1761)

28.04.2016 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Petrophora chlorosata / Basil Sergienko.

28.04.2016 6:31, Ivan Pristrem:

Sources photo? Diptera.info, Carabidae of the world, Atlas of Russian beetles ... I can continue listing. They are very much! Besides large sites where tens of thousands of photos, there is still a lot of medium-sized, but also with good material, type and http://coleop123.narod.ru https://www.flickr.com/photos/coleoptera-us, there is also the definition of accuracy is up to 99% inclusive.It would be very makroid in this collection enter, there a lot of photos, but - there is the definition of a mess.

28.04.2016 1:04, Peter Khramov:

I repeat. We consider the problem in items. 1 and 2. P. 3 do not consider.

28.04.2016 0:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Ivan! And among what sources you are going to look for something? Rights Eugene, saying that they simply do not. I talked to entomologists, so they say that all sites are outdated, that has not been updated for a long time (for the butterflies). What very few sites on which you can somehow navigate, but you must know what you're dealing .....

27.04.2016 22:25, Ivan Pristrem:

By the way, it will be possible to do so, he has there and links to photos from other sites if there were to have any kind of lacked a photo from our site.
And, perhaps, if the Internet among the illustrations in mind there are class "super" image, you will need to try to make sure that they are bound to fall into the top selections.Because such a photo as, for example, here: http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/cicflams.htm, in my view, should be seen by all in the first place.

27.04.2016 22:06, Ivan Pristrem:

Of course, no site is immune from mistakes. I had a case where my photo even Zina incorrectly redefined, although initially I was a correct definition. But my method will reduce the number of bugs and debris to an acceptable minimum.

27.04.2016 20:28, Peter Khramov:

As I wrote in startposte, item 3 - the problem with other methods of solutions. Here the task to overcome the claims. 1 and 2, i.e. that the system correctly determines what kind / taxa shows According to upload a photo or the author's website . And they are wrong or not is, of course, is not defined.So Ivan thinks as a whole in the right direction (about the restrictions sites for indexing).

27.04.2016 20:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Oh, John! No internet in the completely reliable. As always there is any doubt in many cases. You just have to infinitesimal to understand at least in the limited taxonomic group to evaluate the accuracy of the images in the network. And the number of species, surely determined by the pictures, not quite large in relation to their total number.

27.04.2016 19:07, Ivan Pristrem:

And what if to compile a catalog of reliable online sources and make sure that the server was searching for an image only in them? The volume of the material, of course, will be smaller, but the definition will significantly by 99% and foreign is not garbage. Make one more similarity Yandex or Google makes no sense, such as search engines and dofiga and more.By the way, in the same way you can fine-tune the search for any other material - books, articles, films and so on..

27.04.2016 15:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diarsia / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.04.2016 11:42, Peter Khramov:

What better time to see one - it is of course ...

26.04.2016 10:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Also I suspect that not dyuzhe help. It was too much inadequate definitions of the network and look there, "the pearl" ... There are sites that you trust, that they as a rule, you use. But Yuri is right - we must try to speak confidently.

26.04.2016 1:32, Yuri Semejkin:

To answer, we must try. And without thinking, hardly much easier.

25.04.2016 22:23, Vladimir Deryabin:

Is it possible that this Nematopogon swammerdamella?

25.04.2016 22:03, Peter Khramov:

If you look foty, for example, insects (and other animals) in Googol / Yandeks.Kartinki on the names of these same insects that can meet two major challenges:

1.GugolYandeks considers the text surrounding the image and so on and so forth, which will result in a lot of every kind of debris found, and the pictures will often be obvious, it is, in fact, whether or not it is. Especially true for species that have little ph on the Internet.
2.Upon request, the higher taxa (eg, tribes) will be displayed foty it with signatures where there is the name of the tribe, and we often need to be displayed even foty all lower taxa.

Question: if a gizmo that will search the web insect pictures and which thus overcomes the drawbacks of the claims.1-2, it is much easier for you life?

ZY It's clear that there is still entitled to claim 3 "picture author himself does not know what to put in a network, and the definition of its inadequate", but that's the problem with very different methods of solving ...

24.04.2016 18:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Adoxophyes orana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 18:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cucullia lucifuga / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.04.2016 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Archiearis parthenias / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Aglossa dimidiatus / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.04.2016 17:51, Irina Nikulina:

Boudinotiana notha

24.04.2016 17:51, Irina Nikulina:

Boudinotiana notha

24.04.2016 17:44, Irina Nikulina:

Archiearis parthenias

24.04.2016 16:47, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, I see) In general, the head of the other. A forehead still, in my opinion, not red, and just like in the description dimidiatus - "the forehead, crown and nape dirty cream")

24.04.2016 14:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

At this butterfly forehead broad and red, on skopary not pull. :)

24.04.2016 12:59, Irina Nikulina:

And perhaps) Sash, I did, too, watched, but more on the Asian sites, and confused color and costal margin - and jpmoth.org, and on the other, for example - http://photozou.jp/photo/show/1433095 / 225 721 309. I thought about scoparia, moreover from the neighboring region - nipponalis or mandschurica..No now look - very similar to the pattern dimidiatus.

24.04.2016 12:04, Irina Nikulina:

Well, yes, because of the color and put a "?") These are not met. But perhaps here it is in the colors of the images went into the blue, leaf something bluish, too, can be strong in the shadows was shot? ..

24.04.2016 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Instead Aglossa dimidiatus whether it ? :)

24.04.2016 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

I, too, "?", A very dark, but other species of the Russian Far East found. Maybe it is. :)

24.04.2016 11:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Nyctegretis triangulella / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eucarta arctides / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 11:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Tethea or terrosa / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Tethea or terrosa / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Anania / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Anania / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Anania verbascalis / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Pleuroptya ruralis / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2016 1:50, Irina Nikulina:

Adoxophyes orana?

24.04.2016 1:34, Irina Nikulina:

Nyctegretis triangulella

24.04.2016 1:05, Irina Nikulina:

Eucarta arctides

24.04.2016 0:53, Irina Nikulina:

Tethea or terrosa

23.04.2016 23:01, Irina Nikulina:

Scopariinae

23.04.2016 22:55, Irina Nikulina:

Anania sp. Determination to the kind of confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS), a precise definition to the species without genital analysis is impossible, since There are 2 similar dv-kind.

23.04.2016 22:54, Irina Nikulina:

Anania sp. Determination to the kind of confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS), a precise definition to the species without genital analysis is impossible, since There are 2 similar dv-kind.

23.04.2016 22:47, Irina Nikulina:

Anania verbascalis Definition confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

23.04.2016 22:45, Irina Nikulina:

Pleuroptya ruralis Definition confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

23.04.2016 11:11, Nikolai Vladimirov:

not the point

23.04.2016 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

23.04.2016 8:43, Sergey Novitckiy:

Determining accurate. Confirmed Vitaly Kavurka (Zoology Institute named Schmalhausen NAS).

23.04.2016 8:39, Sergey Novitckiy: This species is identified correctly.

22.04.2016 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just dead in the best case)
That is if you remove your fingers then it may be a collector and rolled a stretch.

22.04.2016 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Collection.

22.04.2016 8:23, Yuri Semejkin:

So it's kind of a means itself. In any case, the nearest and most likely not very near future.

22.04.2016 7:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

22.04.2016 7:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Circobotys heterogenalis / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2016 7:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Sitochroa verticalis / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2016 7:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Eudonia truncicolella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2016 7:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, chief specialist if not taken up the form, then we probably do not need to specify :)

22.04.2016 2:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! Here is the answer Valentina Antonovna: This moth belongs to the same group Endotricha, which is significantly determined by the genitals.

21.04.2016 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Determining altered by analogy with the photo in the group.

21.04.2016 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Peter Khramov Alexandr Zhakov.

21.04.2016 19:21, Irina Nikulina:

With these bright yellow wings here, I think, a rare Circobotys heterogenalis , the female? http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Circobotys_heterogenalis_gensanalis.html

21.04.2016 18:07, Irina Nikulina:

Also Sitochroa verticalis

21.04.2016 17:44, Irina Nikulina:

Here, apparently analogous http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/57090

21.04.2016 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Eudonia truncicolella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2016 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Sitochroa verticalis / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2016 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Timandra / Alexandr Zhakov Timandra recompta / Yuri Semejkin.

21.04.2016 17:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acleris / Confidently identified Acleris boscanoides / Tentatively identified.

21.04.2016 17:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eudonia lacustrata / Zoran Bozovic Acleris / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.04.2016 17:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, this from moth Acleris.

21.04.2016 17:26, Irina Nikulina:

I can not say much on friendly terms)), but then, in my opinion, Jura rights, only such recompta sling. Moreover, again a bit variants, rectistrigaria other. Comptaria have never observed such an extension bands, especially at the edges, and the color of her somewhat different.

21.04.2016 17:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In general, no checkbox is not set as the hawk moth on this photo is not in the nature, just dead and not a collector)
But in general these photos better not to download (carefully filter content before downloading).
Well, they do not attach weight website and that's it :)

21.04.2016 17:05, Irina Nikulina:

Sitochroa verticalis

21.04.2016 16:52, Irina Nikulina:

I think, Eudonia sp. In 37 reg. only 4 dblf Scopariinae, it's not Gesneria, and Scoparia ancipitella (two-tone fringe here). Perhaps, Eudonia truncicolella ?

21.04.2016 16:33, Irina Nikulina:

Apparently, this accidentally hit Eudonia

21.04.2016 15:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Good. Let's try, Wait skins.

21.04.2016 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

I have a prior defined it differently, but there is no certainty either. That would Kirpichnikova show. :)

21.04.2016 15:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I was born with it not friends, I can neither deny this definition, nor confirm. Let's wait for another opinion. :)

21.04.2016 15:20, Yuri Semejkin:

According to the determinant. the extended band is common in this species.

21.04.2016 14:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Timandra recompta

21.04.2016 14:53, Yuri Semejkin:

I will say that it Endotricha olivacealis (Bremer, 1864)

21.04.2016 14:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Amphipyra / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.04.2016 14:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.04.2016 14:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Timandra / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.04.2016 14:41, Shamil Murtazin:

It seems already discussed ... Here like collector's item and is not very well write =)

21.04.2016 14:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Enargia paleacea / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.04.2016 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Endotricha / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.04.2016 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pseudeustrotia candidula / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.04.2016 12:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you!

21.04.2016 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Photos should be changed. :)

21.04.2016 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Geography will be? :)

21.04.2016 10:55, Alexander Belousov:

Duplicate Photo # 31043

21.04.2016 10:54, Alexander Belousov:

Duplicate Photo # 31044

21.04.2016 7:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Harpalus / Evgeny Komarov.

20.04.2016 22:58, Irina Nikulina:

Well, I just do not "Live insect (nature photography)" ((

20.04.2016 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Vladimir Bobow Halyzia sedecimguttata / Ivan Tislenko.

20.04.2016 21:42, Ivan Tislenko:

Halyzia sedecimguttata http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1000984

20.04.2016 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Vladimir Bobow Harmonia axyridis / Ivan Tislenko.

20.04.2016 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Vladimir Bobow Harmonia axyridis / Ivan Tislenko.

20.04.2016 21:30, Ivan Tislenko:

Harmonia axyridis http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838142

20.04.2016 21:30, Ivan Tislenko:

Harmonia axyridis http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838142

20.04.2016 16:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) I do not have time, confused definition, began to compare, but very distracted. :)

20.04.2016 16:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypsopygia glaucinalis / Vladimir Bobow Hypsopygia placens / Irina Nikulina.

20.04.2016 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Vladimir Bobow Psyllobora vigintiduopunctata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.04.2016 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cassidinae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.04.2016 15:32, Irina Nikulina:

I doubt very much, I think, then Hypsopygia placens glaucinalis have front and rear wings of the same color - gray with olive tinge. In placens PC pinkish-yellow, sometimes with a violet hue. But, more importantly, only placens so that's yellow-pink fringe [113]. Removes both types, notable differences. You can see the comparison Jurin glaucinalis, certain VA Kirpichnikova http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/41685

20.04.2016 14:53, Irina Nikulina:

I agree more than) Whether it is the 40th region, would not have dared to say anything definite. There is, perhaps, the only option with recompta more or less obvious. But there seems little choice, given that rectistrigaria completely different. In general, I would like to find out with the help of Eugene A., do not lose hope))

20.04.2016 14:42, Irina Nikulina:

I think, yes, you're right. Yesterday a couple of times and it is written - in kommnentariyah author, and then look what Eugene writes in the comments to the photos ...) In general, bear more and copyright comments. Thank you.

20.04.2016 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blepharita amica / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

20.04.2016 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe / Alexandr Zhakov Epirrhoe alternata / Basil Sergienko.

20.04.2016 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe / Alexandr Zhakov Epirrhoe alternata / Basil Sergienko.

20.04.2016 13:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Acleris bergmanniana (Linnaeus, 1758) ?

20.04.2016 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Tortricidae / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.04.2016 13:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Tortricidae / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.04.2016 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Eucosma / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.04.2016 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Xanthorhoe / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.04.2016 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Xanthorhoe / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.04.2016 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, this information is probably better not to "comment on a photo" and "Kommntariyah author"

20.04.2016 10:32, Irina Nikulina:

By confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

20.04.2016 10:31, Irina Nikulina:

By confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

20.04.2016 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Generally everything is complicated with this come :))

20.04.2016 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Timandra recompta Timandra comptaria.

20.04.2016 6:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Congratulations to all the new season 2016)))

19.04.2016 23:03, Irina Nikulina:

Determination confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

19.04.2016 23:02, Irina Nikulina:

Determination confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

19.04.2016 18:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Basil Sergienko.

19.04.2016 15:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Aethes smeathmanniana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.04.2016 15:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Endothenia / Irina Nikulina.

19.04.2016 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Apotomis betuletana / Irina Nikulina.

19.04.2016 15:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Hedya ochroleucana / Irina Nikulina.

19.04.2016 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Imago / Nikolai Vladimirov Archips crataegana / Female / Irina Nikulina.

19.04.2016 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Imago / Nikolai Vladimirov Archips crataegana / Female / Irina Nikulina.

19.04.2016 15:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.04.2016 13:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Shot on Seryozhka Salix caprea

18.04.2016 11:53, Irina Nikulina:

Aethes smeathmanniana?

18.04.2016 11:32, Irina Nikulina:

Eucosma sp. Perhaps, Eucosma obumbratana ?

18.04.2016 11:20, Irina Nikulina:

Endothenia gentianaeana?

18.04.2016 11:11, Irina Nikulina:

Apotomis betuletana?

18.04.2016 10:43, Irina Nikulina:

Hedya ochroleucana

18.04.2016 10:36, Irina Nikulina:

Archips crataegana female?

18.04.2016 10:35, Irina Nikulina:

Archips crataegana female?

16.04.2016 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hebomoia leucippe Hebomoia leucippe detanii.

16.04.2016 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hebomoia leucippe Hebomoia leucippe detanii.

16.04.2016 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Catopsilia scylla Catopsilia scylla cornelia.

16.04.2016 15:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Catopsilia scylla Catopsilia scylla cornelia.

16.04.2016 11:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Lixus bardanae / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 10:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sitona / Ivan Pristrem Sitona humeralis / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 10:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

16.04.2016 10:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

16.04.2016 10:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sitona inops / Ivan Pristrem Sitona humeralis / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 10:54, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

16.04.2016 10:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sitona inops / Ivan Pristrem Sitona humeralis / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 10:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Bagous Bagous argillaceus.

16.04.2016 10:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Ivan Pristrem Pseudocleonus cinereus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 10:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Ivan Pristrem Lixus rubicundus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 10:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Ivan Pristrem Lixus rubicundus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 10:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Ivan Pristrem Lixus rubicundus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 10:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Larinus / Ivan Pristrem Larinus vulpes / Evgeny Komarov.

16.04.2016 0:17, Irina Nikulina:

Female

15.04.2016 19:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala dissimilis / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 18:32, Irina Nikulina:

And here, too, Catocala dissimilis

15.04.2016 18:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala dula / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 18:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, I looked at Kononenko and came to the same :)

15.04.2016 18:28, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, I think there is also Catocala dula , it is quite variable, but fits

15.04.2016 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here is something interesting, if it was Europe, it would Catocala sponsa , that there is so like her?

15.04.2016 18:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala electa / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 18:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala fulminea / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala dula / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala dissimilis / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 18:16, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala dula

15.04.2016 18:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Peridea oberthueri / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 18:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Peridea oberthueri / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 18:09, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala electa

15.04.2016 17:57, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala fulminea

15.04.2016 17:47, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala dissimilis

15.04.2016 17:21, Irina Nikulina:

Peridea oberthueri

15.04.2016 16:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pyrgus maculatus / Yuri Semejkin.

15.04.2016 15:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Pyrgus maculatus (Bremer & Grey, 1853)

15.04.2016 8:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Abrostola ussuriensis / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2016 7:29, Shamil Murtazin:

In the refrigerator stored in moist sphagnum moss. I think now we need to add a bit of "Topaz", so as not moldy, even slightly.
Conclusions In the cage: a pot of water, the neck with a mesh top and a plastic bag. Humidity differently under 100%. It is standing in the room, i.e. 20-25 degrees exactly there.

14.04.2016 23:53, Konstantin Lyutov:

they must be kept in as close to their natural environment. in terms of humidity, temperature ... I have 95% of hibernating pupae vyhodyat..ot sawflies to hawk moths ...)))

14.04.2016 21:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

14.04.2016 21:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Ivan Pristrem Lixus myagri / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

14.04.2016 21:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Ivan Pristrem Lixus pulverulentus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

14.04.2016 21:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Ivan Pristrem Lixus angustus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

14.04.2016 21:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus / Ivan Pristrem Lixus angustus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus brevipes / Ivan Pristrem Lixus angustus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

14.04.2016 21:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

14.04.2016 21:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lixus brevipes / Ivan Pristrem Lixus angustus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sitona / Ivan Pristrem Sitona puncticollis / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Yuri Arzanova.

14.04.2016 21:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Larinus iaceae / Ivan Pristrem Larinus sturnus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Larinus / Ivan Pristrem Larinus sturnus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.04.2016 21:08, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps, Alcis medialbifera ?

14.04.2016 17:45, Irina Nikulina:

Abrostola sp. Most likely, Abrostola ussuriensis . 37 reg. 4 species, could not find Korbi, is not esteemed descriptions from Kononenko, he gives a synonym for korbi - pacifica (in Sinev pacifica is given separately and is only for the Kurils). Image both species there table. and differential. diagnosis is also in the description. http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Plusiinae/Abrostola_pacifica.html

14.04.2016 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hypsopygia glaucinalis / Yuri Semejkin.

14.04.2016 15:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Hypsopygia glaucinalis (Linnaeus, 1758)

14.04.2016 15:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Aphantopus hyperantus / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.04.2016 15:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala pacta / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.04.2016 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diasemia reticularis / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.04.2016 14:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Lopinga achine / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.04.2016 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aphantopus hyperantus

14.04.2016 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lopinga achine

14.04.2016 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Female.

14.04.2016 11:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Macaria loricaria / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2016 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2016 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Macaria loricaria.

14.04.2016 10:56, Irina Nikulina:

Macaria loricaria

14.04.2016 10:56, Irina Nikulina:

Macaria loricaria

14.04.2016 10:23, Shamil Murtazin:

thanks =)

14.04.2016 9:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.04.2016 9:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shamil Murtazin Conistra erythrocephala / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.04.2016 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shamil Murtazin Conistra vaccinii / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.04.2016 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shamil Murtazin Conistra vaccinii / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.04.2016 23:10, Nikolai Vladimirov:

take photo # 56710

13.04.2016 21:56, Shamil Murtazin:

then I'm not sure ...

13.04.2016 18:42, Irina Nikulina:

Reserves Photo # 37134

13.04.2016 18:41, Irina Nikulina:

Reserves Photo # 26335

13.04.2016 13:42, Shamil Murtazin:

At the same place, at the same hour ...

13.04.2016 7:49, Shamil Murtazin:

is a field or a home?

12.04.2016 14:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good Chilean website Neotropical beetles: http://coleoptera-neotropical.org/

12.04.2016 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Geometra papilionaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Paracolax tristalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.04.2016 14:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Carterocephalus silvicola / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Deltote pygarga / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Deltote bankiana / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Deltote bankiana / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, do not look at what is already defined. :) When two opinions coincide? To good. :)

12.04.2016 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Yuri Semejkin.

12.04.2016 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ecliptopera capitata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Diacrisia irene / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erynnis tages / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

12.04.2016 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Neptis rivularis / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 12:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Geometridae.

12.04.2016 12:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Acronicta rumicis / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 12:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Scirpophaga xanthopygata / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 11:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Archips rosana / Male / Irina Nikulina.

12.04.2016 11:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Archips / Irina Nikulina.

12.04.2016 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala fraxini / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.04.2016 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Plusia putnami festata / Irina Nikulina.

12.04.2016 11:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pelosia muscerda / Irina Nikulina.

12.04.2016 11:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ghoria gigantea / Irina Nikulina.

12.04.2016 11:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Oncocera semirubella / Irina Nikulina.

12.04.2016 0:46, Irina Nikulina:

Archips sp.

12.04.2016 0:41, Irina Nikulina:

Archips sp. It is necessary to look in detail dv-types

11.04.2016 23:18, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala sp. ?

11.04.2016 20:48, Irina Nikulina:

Plusia putnami festata

11.04.2016 19:55, Irina Nikulina:

Pelosia muscerda

11.04.2016 19:39, Irina Nikulina:

Ghoria gigantea

11.04.2016 19:32, Irina Nikulina:

Oncocera semirubella

11.04.2016 17:01, Peter Khramov:

Yes, Basil, try to quickly do this thing.

11.04.2016 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neuroptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

11.04.2016 15:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Neuroptera

11.04.2016 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Forficulidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.04.2016 20:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Confidently identified Moechotypa thoracica / Tentatively identified.

10.04.2016 17:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Confidently identified Noserius tibialis / Tentatively identified.

10.04.2016 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Antheraea Antheraea larissoides.

10.04.2016 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Antheraea Antheraea larissoides.

10.04.2016 10:43, Alex Dumchus:

Saturnia thibeta, (Westwood, 1853)

10.04.2016 10:40, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea larissoides Bouvier, 1928

10.04.2016 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Timandra recompta / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.04.2016 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Timandra recompta / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.04.2016 8:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Mythimna radiata / Irina Nikulina.

09.04.2016 22:28, Irina Nikulina:

There is also no comae. Most likely, Timandra comptaria

09.04.2016 22:26, Irina Nikulina:

Timandra comae not marked to the east of the region 23. In 37 reg. 3 species of the genus Timandra. I think there Timandra recompta

09.04.2016 21:50, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna radiata

09.04.2016 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Yuri Semejkin Elateridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.04.2016 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, let the last opportunity to add subspecies curators.
And then I look at the matter fell dead center again (although the issue was raised several times previously) (
We must first expand the desired functionality for existing supervisors, and then start talking about recruiting new people.De facto is now doing something on the site, exactly half (3 pers.) From the prescribed on the main page in the rank of curator people.
This is certainly the disorder and it is necessary to take some steps. Let's try to start with the expansion of functionality :)

09.04.2016 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah thanks. Whenever I guess yourself before asking a question (stepped) :)
The answer is: http://tourist-area.com/chili-chili/regioni-chili-chto-oznachaiut-eti-tsifri
Question shot :)

09.04.2016 14:34, Peter Khramov:

Basil, infa by regions are in Pedivikii and beyond.

09.04.2016 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually there was a question concerning the division into regions in Chile.
There unspecified number of bugs with approx. this geography: "Chile, Uico Alto, reg X."
What is a region 10 ihnem understanding?
It is necessary to know for the infinitesimal accurate reference to the map because placename Uico Alto can not find on the map. Looks like it's such a hole that is not on the map and is designated (.In this case, arrange knowledge though, would be the region's center, just his number does not give absolutely nothing Russian man :)

09.04.2016 3:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, not only in 37. Alexander! It has been said that Sinev far from complete. Apart Sineva there are also others. Sources. For example to insects of the Far East Volume 5, Part IV. Where p. 159 refers to the presence of species among other things and in the Khabarovsk Territory and the Amur region ...

08.04.2016 21:55, Peter Khramov:

Lord, we have seen some stagnation with curators, especially in subject areas not beetles and butterflies (although for him, too). Who previously voiced, so I have from time to time, I contact all of them, "that look", but a lot of the work has not yet started on the fact. Therefore, please, who have the opportunity, to kick of new people for Supervision taxa.

08.04.2016 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sam was surprised :)

08.04.2016 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Irina Nikulina.

08.04.2016 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Ostrinia furnacalis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 18:17, Irina Nikulina:

Ostrinia sp. VA Kirpichnikova writes in his monograph that only 4 out of 11 ET-species (peregrinalis, palustralis, quadripunctalis and latipennis) well differ in appearance and genitals. All other nubilalis combined into a group, it describes six new species (Munroe, Mutuura, 1970). But according to VA Kirpichnikova, independence species of this group, except zealis, is questionable and should be considered a single species.divided into geogr. subspecies. The author recognizes two allopatric, morphologically indistinguishable species O.nubilalis (Europe, Zap.Aziya, NW Africa, North America) and O. furnacalis (DDA South, South-East Asia , Japan. China, Korea, Australia). By the way, O. furnacalis not marked in Sinev for 37 of the region, but was collected in 2006 in Bolshekhekhtsirsky Reserve (South Khabar. Edge) http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/vvdubat/pdf/AWFE_6_80-87.pdf and Pivane (near Amursk) [113].So here. perhaps the group Ostrinia furnacalis can be attributed. Of the 4 above-mentioned outwardly distinguishable types of species only latipennis the description and photo raises some doubts (but again it in Sinev for 37 reg. No), the rest looks the other.

08.04.2016 17:22, Irina Nikulina:

I flew out of 36 in the region)) Already in the 3rd or 4th time, as I recall, in the region of 37 found butterflies, which are not specified in Sinev.

08.04.2016 15:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Evergestis pallidata / Irina Nikulina.

08.04.2016 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Orgyiini / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 15:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Orgyiini / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Aglais io / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

08.04.2016 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cosmia restituta / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cosmia restituta / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 15:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 15:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 15:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

In blue, for 37 of the region there may be interesting?

08.04.2016 14:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Euclidia glyphica / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Rivula sericealis / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.04.2016 13:10, Peter Khramov:

Removed reference. Edit bindings users delayed, but will be soon.

08.04.2016 7:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

At first I thought to Calamotropha aureliellus , but then agreed :)

08.04.2016 7:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Calamotropha paludella purella / Irina Nikulina.

07.04.2016 20:18, Irina Nikulina:

Calamotropha paludella , I think. In the DDA inhabits subspecies C. p. purella http://osaka-insecta.sakura.ne.jp/moth/d-shirotutoga.html

07.04.2016 17:37, Irina Nikulina:

Anania verbascalis?

07.04.2016 17:21, Irina Nikulina:

Evergestis pallidata

07.04.2016 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cucullia argentea / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.04.2016 14:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hypena proboscidalis / Yuri Semejkin.

07.04.2016 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Epiblema foenella / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.04.2016 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hypsopygia iwamotoi / Yuri Semejkin.

07.04.2016 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Austrapoda dentata / Irina Nikulina.

07.04.2016 12:52, Yuri Semejkin:

You just have to describe the pupae to remove the Old, they hibernate in leaf litter and a link at this point in the Red Book. The fact that in the journal Biological studies Gornotaёzhnoy Station Number 10, 2006, in an article Experience breeding and Primorye and some species of Lepidoptera .... Authors MM Omelko, NV Omelko , MA Omelko said.In a number of publications (Kononov, 1968 Red Book, 2001) information on the biology altsinoya were not particularly accurate
So it is necessary to remove references to these publications.?

07.04.2016 12:00, Irina Nikulina:

With the first-born in 2016, Ure!) It turns out that information from the Red Book of Primorsky Krai [96] have become obsolete. You need to add new information to the description of the type and results of studies on Gornotaёzhnoy station of which you wrote to me.

07.04.2016 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Another confirmation that the pupae do not spend the winter under snow in the leaf litter hiding from the cold. Here and adults appeared ....

06.04.2016 21:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Silphidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Silpha perforata / Evgeny Komarov.

06.04.2016 21:24, Nikolai Vladimirov:

priyavyazal not to the point

06.04.2016 18:16, Irina Nikulina:

Austrapoda dentata

06.04.2016 16:25, Yuri Semejkin:

I speak out for fly Hypena proboscidalis (Linnaeus, 1758)?

06.04.2016 16:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Hypsopygia iwamotoi Kirpichnikova & Yamanaka, 1995

06.04.2016 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

06.04.2016 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Peltis grossa / Vladimir Bobow Silphidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.04.2016 7:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.04.2016 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let it be in inaccurate)
Trite hand is not raised such a photo in the exact place (

05.04.2016 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Confidently identified Trichoferus campestris / Tentatively identified.

05.04.2016 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Vera Volkotrub Anastrangalia sequensi / Boris Georgi.

05.04.2016 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Vera Volkotrub Anastrangalia sequensi / Boris Georgi.

05.04.2016 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Yuri Semejkin Stenocorus amurensis / Boris Georgi.

05.04.2016 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lamiinae / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Thyestilla gebleri / Female / Boris Georgi.

05.04.2016 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.04.2016 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It should probably be understood as one of the tergites :)
Sklree just does not matter what kind of account.

05.04.2016 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Euthrix albomaculata / Female / Yuri Semejkin.

05.04.2016 19:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

I understand that this "tergite" :)) though some of the account does not say. :)

05.04.2016 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All well-written: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Тергит

05.04.2016 19:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Melitaea sutschana / Irina Nikulina.

05.04.2016 19:19, Ivan Pristrem:

Excuse me, but what is this body? If possible, sign pictures - where is represented, and that is absolutely not clear.

05.04.2016 18:49, Irina Nikulina:

Melitaea sutschana , I think

05.04.2016 18:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

I honestly did not recognize her :)

05.04.2016 18:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cifuna locuples / Irina Nikulina.

05.04.2016 18:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.04.2016 17:33, Boris Georgi:

Anastrangalia sequensi
http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/sequensi-%28Reitter-1898%29

05.04.2016 17:22, Boris Georgi:

I think that it Stenocorus amurensis , other such stenocorus on DV like as not.
http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/amurensis-%28Kraatz-1879%29

05.04.2016 17:02, Boris Georgi:

Trichoferus exactly, and who may still be in addition campestris?

05.04.2016 7:49, Boris Georgi:

According determinant beetles ET identified as Thyestilla gebleri.

04.04.2016 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Erebia cyclopius / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2016 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, I agree))
Frankly, rusty simply the discussion, but now refresh your memory. Of course, this Erebia cyclopius.
Stand.

04.04.2016 22:09, Irina Nikulina:

And why? In my opinion there is just Erebia cyclopius already discussed recently - dual black spot in wanga smaller, less smooth (sdvoennost more visible, it is like a figure eight) and bordering fuzzy, narrow, yellowish-reddish, only slightly lighter background in contrast from light yellow and have a wider cyclopius.

04.04.2016 21:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae Thranius sumatrensis.

04.04.2016 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euplexia japonica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2016 20:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Hydria undulata / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2016 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Agnidra scabiosa / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2016 20:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Olethreutes arcuella / Vladimir Bobow Olethreutes captiosanus / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2016 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pyraloidea / Evgeny Komarov Paratalanta / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2016 20:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypsopygia iwamotoi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2016 19:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Probably yes. There simply is close. Not to become more or less a certain awareness. Little information is dug. Unambiguous no certainty okromya family :(

04.04.2016 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Male.

04.04.2016 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Male.

04.04.2016 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Male.

04.04.2016 18:55, Denis Potanin:

Not Xenocerus sp. Is this true?

04.04.2016 18:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Exactly :)

04.04.2016 17:56, Denis Potanin:

under grandis there probably is meant a group of species ...

04.04.2016 17:52, Denis Potanin:

I'm such a forum on cerambycoidea.com seen, it seems.

04.04.2016 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Pseudoips prasinana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.04.2016 16:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pachyderes Agrypninae.

04.04.2016 16:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Agrypninae / Confidently identified Pachyderes / Tentatively identified.

04.04.2016 15:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Schoenherria hastata Schoenherria borneensis.

04.04.2016 15:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.04.2016 15:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Cifuna locuples / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.04.2016 13:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Erebia wanga or Erebia cyclopius
More inclined to the first.

04.04.2016 13:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Lamiinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.04.2016 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Staurophora celsia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.04.2016 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.04.2016 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.04.2016 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.04.2016 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.04.2016 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.04.2016 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This subspecies nonche :)
It should, by the way in the title subspecies put parenthesis: http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/dichroa-(Blanchard-1871)

04.04.2016 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.04.2016 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Stictoleptura rubra dichroa / Boris Georgi.

04.04.2016 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Stictoleptura rubra dichroa / Female / Boris Georgi.

04.04.2016 7:26, Boris Georgi:

I think that this Stictoleptura dichroa.

04.04.2016 1:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Changed opinion Euthrix albomaculata. Apparently this is a female

03.04.2016 21:27, Peter Khramov:

Removed reference.

03.04.2016 21:19, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Not the point on the map

03.04.2016 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala / Yuri Semejkin.

03.04.2016 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looks like it.

03.04.2016 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Gastropacha quercifolia / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.04.2016 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Gastropacha quercifolia / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.04.2016 18:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Gastropacha quercifolia / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.04.2016 18:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Gastropacha quercifolia / Yuri Semejkin.

03.04.2016 18:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Gastropacha quercifolia / Female / Yuri Semejkin.

03.04.2016 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Gastropacha populifolia / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.04.2016 18:14, Irina Nikulina:

Probably I went other ways)
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=205458
https://data.nbn.org.uk/Taxa/NBNSYS0000005801
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentiinae/Xanthorhoe_quadrifasciata_ignobilis.html and others. Then she looked in the catalog Sinev (in print) - also quadrifasciata.
Who lepiforum read that this is the old name. Thank you, Sasha.

03.04.2016 18:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! If you think the transfer. And I want to book!

03.04.2016 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Gastropacha populifolia / Yuri Semejkin.

03.04.2016 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I see here Euthrix albomaculata. I will send a book, look at the view may change. :)

03.04.2016 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Euthrix albomaculata / Yuri Semejkin.

03.04.2016 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Euthrix albomaculata / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

03.04.2016 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Datanoides fasciatus / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.04.2016 16:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

It seems right.
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Xanthorhoe_Quadrifasiata
http://fauna.naturkundemuseum-berlin.de/full_results.php?id=445342

03.04.2016 16:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Vladimir Bobow Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata / Irina Nikulina.

03.04.2016 6:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Catocala dula / Irina Nikulina.

03.04.2016 6:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysorithrum amata / Irina Nikulina.

03.04.2016 6:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysorithrum amata / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2016 19:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Scoliopteryx libatrix / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2016 17:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Vladimir Bobow Catarhoe cuculata / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2016 16:14, Irina Nikulina:

Scoliopteryx libatrix

02.04.2016 15:57, Irina Nikulina:

Catarhoe cuculata

02.04.2016 15:11, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala dula?

02.04.2016 14:55, Peter Khramov:

To carry relevant small - there are new plastic boxes with izolona at the bottom of 190 pe. http://store.insecta.pro/ru/catalog/2071

02.04.2016 14:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Euthrix albomaculata (Bremer, 1861)

02.04.2016 14:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Thank you, Irina, lopuhnulsya :)

02.04.2016 14:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Horisme vitalbata / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2016 14:09, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion this is Catocala adultera (Menetries, 1856)

02.04.2016 13:34, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysorithrum amata

02.04.2016 13:32, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysorithrum amatum

02.04.2016 13:29, Irina Nikulina:

No, Eugene, who is there from Horisme ? Horisme vitalbata , most likely.

02.04.2016 12:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Eupithecia sp.

02.04.2016 12:03, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, however, and wrote - see for yourself, briefly looked. Here I agree, the more you're at higher magnification posmotret.Etot could sign more on some sites encountered, for example, there http://www.lepinet.fr/especes/nation/lep/index.php?id=35830.

02.04.2016 11:41, Yuri Semejkin:

I would like to hear Sergienko.

02.04.2016 11:40, Irina Nikulina:

But there is some doubt - rather than Eulithis achatinellaria it? http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=467891 Lives in Siberia and the Far East.

02.04.2016 11:39, Evgeny Komarov:

There, Yuri.

02.04.2016 11:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Thetidia smaragdaria / Yuri Semejkin.

02.04.2016 11:31, Irina Nikulina:

Eulithis testata?

02.04.2016 11:31, Evgeny Komarov:

If shown to be guided by Irina sign, here it should be efformata. Clear sharp corner is visible.

02.04.2016 11:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Thetidia smaragdaria (Fabricius, 1787)? I do not know whether there is in Kazakhstan, according to the website directory not look.

02.04.2016 10:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Also I look. I am of the view Eugene. Looked at lepiforume - 1). y A. efformata in the basal region. There are almost all pictures t / brown strokes (A. plagiata have not seen such clear).
2) In the dusky light bar perevyazyamt passes. In my opinion it is still somewhat narrower than that of A. plagiata. ..Pictures from individuals compared with approximately equally spread apart krylyami.oboih species. Perhaps she should stay where she is now. And before you know, and an expert on Kazakhstan there will moths.

02.04.2016 9:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Catarhoe cuculata / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2016 9:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Catarhoe cuculata.

02.04.2016 9:53, Yuri Semejkin:

I tend to version Ecliptopera capitata (Herrich-Schaffer, 1839)? But there is a similar Ecliptopera umbrosaria

02.04.2016 9:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.04.2016 9:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae Aplocera plagiata.

02.04.2016 9:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Here on the ground, I looked (at hand there are plenty of resolution), it turns out still plagiata - rounded corner. Well, kind of normal for Kazakhstan (on Kazenas). I take on in inaccurate.

02.04.2016 9:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov Cidaria fulvata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2016 9:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Thank you, Yuri! Download now. All that I have now reloaded from indefinite Kazakhstan. With shovels for a long time using Matov understood, and moths are "dead weight".

02.04.2016 9:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Cosmorhoe ocellata / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2016 8:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Gastropacha populifolia (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

02.04.2016 8:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Gastropacha quercifolia (Linnaeus, 1758)

02.04.2016 8:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diachrysia stenochrysis / Evgeny Komarov.

02.04.2016 8:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diachrysia stenochrysis / Evgeny Komarov.

02.04.2016 8:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Euthrix potatoria (Linnaeus, 1758)

02.04.2016 8:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Plusia festucae / Evgeny Komarov.

02.04.2016 8:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Plusia festucae / Evgeny Komarov.

02.04.2016 1:14, Irina Nikulina:

Cosmorhoe ocellata good fly

02.04.2016 0:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Apparently yes Cidaria fulvata (Forster). Images of this kind is in the book Animals of Kazakhstan in the photos. VL Kazenas, PV Egorov Butterflies: moths and cutworms Almaaty 2014, page 10. It is though intended mainly students, but reviewers have her Ph.D. and k.b.n.Tak that Eugene probably makes sense to download, if you have pictures or plan except to throw shooting in Kazakhstan.In the internet, there are freely available PDF

02.04.2016 0:32, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Actocetor indicus

02.04.2016 0:00, Alexander Korolev:

Thank you, Basil.

01.04.2016 23:55, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Tied not to the point of the photo, whether it can somehow decouple or snap to another point?

01.04.2016 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Cidaria sp. In Kazakhstan, there really is Cidaria fulvata (+ subspecies distinctata). But I do not know what other kinds there

01.04.2016 22:54, Irina Nikulina:

Catarhoe cuculata , I think

01.04.2016 22:43, Irina Nikulina:

Aplocera sp. In my opinion. This Aplocera efformata Here, Eugene, look more self - dif. diagnosis http://www.northumberlandmoths.org.uk/moth.php?taxon_from_search=Aplocera%20plagiata third figure at the bottom - left efformata (Lesser Treble-bar), sprava- plagiata (Treble-bar)

01.04.2016 22:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Xanthocosmia jankowskii / Irina Nikulina.

01.04.2016 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.04.2016 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hamadryas velutina Hamadryas laodamia saurites.

01.04.2016 22:07, Alexander Korolev:

The definition is incorrect. It - Hamadryas laodamia, male

01.04.2016 21:53, Irina Nikulina:

Xanthocosmia jankowskii

01.04.2016 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mantodea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.04.2016 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.04.2016 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.04.2016 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plataspididae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

01.04.2016 20:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 20:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 20:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 20:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 20:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 20:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 20:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 20:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 19:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, life begins at 50! And I am quite serious, and their own experience. It was 50 years dramatically changed everything (work, wife) and have never regretted! I do not offer to copy my experience :), but an example of a show :) :)

01.04.2016 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you guys :)
Date round me, however: exactly 50 years ago was born)))

01.04.2016 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, here they are: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/979273
Use search.

01.04.2016 18:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Plataspidae. Perhaps Coptosoma? By the way, neither on the family-woo, nor by the nature of the catalog does not show anything. In region 40 specified kind is there, but the catalog is also "silent".

01.04.2016 17:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Lamia textor / Evgeny Komarov.

01.04.2016 17:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Join now! Good luck, good luck, interesting discoveries and all the!

01.04.2016 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Congratulations Vasily Feoktistov with his birthday! Perfect date you chose; -) I wish you good luck everyday and execution of all things!

01.04.2016 11:02, Peter Khramov:

Victoria and adults can completely download?
ZY For images with an increase in place, please setting "Super" at boot time, okay?

01.04.2016 10:44, Irina Nikulina:

Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata?

31.03.2016 20:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Spatalia doerriesi / Irina Nikulina.

31.03.2016 17:25, Irina Nikulina:

Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata? http://www.catocala.narod.ru/geom39i.html

31.03.2016 16:46, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps one of the 10 species Trichopteryx ? DV-kind Trichopteryx terranea ?

31.03.2016 16:10, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps, Epirrhoe supergressa ? In this region, a subspecies albigressa http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=151078

31.03.2016 16:07, Yuri Semejkin:

I agree with the version of Ira

31.03.2016 15:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Costaconvexa caespitaria (Christoph, 1881) ?

31.03.2016 15:54, Irina Nikulina:

Euphyia unangulata?

31.03.2016 15:44, Irina Nikulina:

Spatalia doerriesi

31.03.2016 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Geometridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.03.2016 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Yponomeuta / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.03.2016 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Geometridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.03.2016 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Geometridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.03.2016 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

31.03.2016 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Geometridae / Andrey Ponomarev.

31.03.2016 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Amphipoea / Irina Nikulina.

31.03.2016 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

I basically do not mind that kind of kind Bryoleuca. But the species of this genus on this site are in the subgenus Bryoleuca kind Bryophila. What are the actions of a moderator? Rises to the rank of subgenus kind? on what basis? no work with the establishment of a new rank Bryoleuca, there is the type species of the genus, there is no kind of list. (More precisely, those I do not know if it's all there). Any work on the description of three new species in the genus Bryoleuca.which is still some species of this genus (kindly provided me work Oleg).
There are three options for solving the situation:
1. Raising the rank of subgenus Bryoleuca. to sort, with automatic transfer of all types of the subgenus in the genus.(Here I ostanavlivaetdve things:
- Not knowing which species in this genus
- Perhaps a few clumsy Systematics (now may Peter and corrected) when subgenus raised to the rank of genus, vseravno remains in the mother's age. :(
2. Creating a new kind Bryoleuca and the inclusion of new species in the description of it.But it turns out that one taxon is in two ranks, and this is not good.
3. kompromisny version of new species in the subgenus Bryoleuca (authors without brackets) and wait for the audit of these groups, and then on the basis of the audit have already spread on leave.
If there are other opinions, I am pleased I will consider them.

31.03.2016 13:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2016 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2016 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2016 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2016 12:38, Oleg Pekarsky:

This butterfly belongs to the genus Bryoleuca.

31.03.2016 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Bryophila pljushtchi / Confidently identified / Female / Oleg Pekarsky.

31.03.2016 11:47, Irina Nikulina:

:) Do not be sorry, Sasha, ordinary, not just the case of an option, most importantly, the same definition) Authorship nice when looking for months and finally get to the bottom, this is not the case)

31.03.2016 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Irina Nikulina.

31.03.2016 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Calyptra thalictri / Yuri Semejkin.

31.03.2016 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Autographa excelsa / Irina Nikulina.

31.03.2016 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) Here, guys, everyone wants to take Ira, determining authorship. :) But I am logged in, and have not seen any of the comment and set definition, and when it fell into place it was already a comment, Irina. Sorry. :)

31.03.2016 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Irina Nikulina.

31.03.2016 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chariaspilates formosaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.03.2016 11:02, Irina Nikulina:

Scotopteryx chenopodiata?

31.03.2016 10:57, Irina Nikulina:

Chariaspilates formosaria

31.03.2016 10:55, Irina Nikulina:

Jura right, it Calyptra thalictri Two other species found in the reg 37, -. Hokkaida and lata - oblique line running from the top of the wing, straight, and only thalictri - curved.

31.03.2016 10:33, Irina Nikulina:

Autographa excelsa

31.03.2016 10:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Rhode Calyptra, but to my mind at the most suitable Calyptra thalictri (Borkhausen, 1790)?

31.03.2016 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysididae / Boris Georgi.

31.03.2016 7:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, everything is normal. ! It happens.

31.03.2016 7:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Yura, I'm sorry, I did not see. Wait a fix that :)

31.03.2016 7:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Yuri Semejkin.

31.03.2016 7:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diachrysia chryson / Yuri Semejkin.

31.03.2016 7:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Actinotia polyodon / Evgeny Komarov.

31.03.2016 7:19, Boris Georgi:

Someone Chrysididae.

31.03.2016 7:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Spatalia plusiotis / Evgeny Komarov.

31.03.2016 7:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene! There actually an hour earlier definition is.

31.03.2016 7:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Callopistria juventina / Evgeny Komarov.

31.03.2016 7:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Macdunnoughia confusa / Evgeny Komarov.

31.03.2016 6:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Smerinthus planus / Evgeny Komarov.

31.03.2016 5:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Smerinthus planus Walker, 1856

31.03.2016 2:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Diachrysia chryson (Esper, 1789)

31.03.2016 0:29, Alexander Korolev:

China. Chongqing Province Dabashan MtR, NE Heyu Vill. 31о 52’ 42” N; 109о 00’ 00” E H=1220 m

30.03.2016 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, like we do not have anyone over. However, just in case I insure (putting in inaccurate))
The female species are almost straight claws.
The male curved claws: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47912

30.03.2016 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Forficula / Confidently identified / Imago Forficula auricularia / Tentatively identified / Female.

30.03.2016 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, just the basic working version - Russian. Here and people more active :)
Therefore it is better to give priority to her)

30.03.2016 21:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes it is a newcomer here - I have long persuaded him - there was too much "delicious" in the collection, so I did not understand everything, and so it that the English that Russian :)

30.03.2016 20:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, thank you. I decided this question :)
Actually I also cringe when Russian-speaking authors ship geography in the English version at the same time forgetting the fact that two versions of the site and initially it has Russian citizenship (

30.03.2016 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes nasicornis Oryctes nasicornis polonicus.

30.03.2016 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes nasicornis Oryctes nasicornis polonicus.

30.03.2016 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Necrodes littoralis / Nikolai Vladimirov Nicrophorus humator / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.03.2016 19:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasily, Alexey everything is filled immediately, that's only in the English version, and native Russian :) ignored.

30.03.2016 19:28, Alexander Korolev:

Thank you, Basil! Uchtu future.

30.03.2016 11:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Dioryctria abietella / Irina Nikulina.

30.03.2016 11:10, Irina Nikulina:

I do not have such rights, Eugene, not the moderator))

30.03.2016 11:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Endure, Irina!

30.03.2016 11:02, Irina Nikulina:

Dioryctria sp. exactly. I read the description and looked again tsv.illyustratsii monograph VA Kirpichnikova, to me it seems like Dioryctria abietella

30.03.2016 10:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Spatalia / Evgeny Komarov Spatalia plusiotis / Irina Nikulina.

30.03.2016 10:17, Irina Nikulina:

There Spatalia plusiotis

30.03.2016 10:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Basil! Clean Yandex. Computer has become faster. The ticks is not buggy, but the problem with ant remained. I'll see how things will be.

30.03.2016 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.03.2016 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This problem is clearly not the site because I have everything working fine at the moment.
Yuri, I seen here a problem specifically associated with your computer.
As one option: we must try to clean your browser cache to start.

30.03.2016 9:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene ! Yes, more than once already I tried Here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55279 not bound shot with ants. I do not find it at any point of the botanical garden, and I can not attach. This is not only a picture, there is at least 1, and also with ants. The rest do not have pictures attached fad attach.
Squares with my common points and also sometimes buggy.Sometimes it is necessary to see the point of not to put ticks and remove them.

30.03.2016 8:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kentrochrysalis streckeri / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

30.03.2016 7:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Dolbina tancrei / Evgeny Komarov.

30.03.2016 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Spatalia / Evgeny Komarov.

30.03.2016 7:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri will likely not logged in. Attach a picture only when not bound by a photo call.

30.03.2016 1:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have everything in place and not gone anywhere.

30.03.2016 1:21, Yuri Semejkin:

point, edit point and radius see the number. But the line to attach a picture to a marker somewhere has got to. Somebody will say it's because of the work on the site?

29.03.2016 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"If the mountain will not come to Magomed, then Mohammed goes to the mountain" )
But the request for filling the field "Location shooting / fishing" is still in force.

29.03.2016 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #55741 group.

29.03.2016 16:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Oleg, if not difficult to link to or even better than the work itself :) that would raise the rank consciously. In all European sites is still Bryophila. I'm not hard to raise the grade, but that would then have been no confusion. :) But for the sake of a new kind, and it is worth doing.

29.03.2016 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera Myrmica.

29.03.2016 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera Formica japonica.

29.03.2016 15:45, Oleg Pekarsky:

Today Bryoleuca schitiaetsya come on par with Bryophila. Not I started:) Scythobrya same genus, rather than a subgenus.

29.03.2016 15:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Myrmica sp. Determine Kupyanskaya AN BPI DVO RAN.

29.03.2016 15:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Formica japonica Motschoulsky, 1866 AN picked Kupyanskaya BPI DVO RAN.

29.03.2016 15:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Elophila nymphaeata / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2016 15:19, Irina Nikulina:

Elophila nymphaeata

29.03.2016 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Calliteara pseudabietis / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.03.2016 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Kind of, I realized Bryoleuca pljushtchi. And what to do with the family? The site is a subgenus Bryoleuca (Hampson, 1908) in the genus Bryophila (Treitschke, 1825). Oleg, if Bryoleuca separate genus that remains in Bryophila?

29.03.2016 13:21, Vladimir Bobow:

Thank you Eugene for the link!

29.03.2016 11:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Vladimir, his hawk moths here look http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/china.htm

29.03.2016 11:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dolbina tancrei / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Kentrochrysalis streckeri / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

29.03.2016 11:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Dorytomus ictor / Evgeny Komarov.

29.03.2016 11:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus distinguendus / Tentatively identified Harpalus affinis / Confidently identified.

29.03.2016 11:01, Evgeny Komarov:

For high-resolution photos pubescence present. It affinis.

29.03.2016 0:54, Vladimir Bobow:

Thank you Irina, read. Now I understand why the picture is different.

28.03.2016 22:18, Nikolai Vladimirov:

I got what you mean. Just before they ever came across in the beginning of May, the truth is out - I thought the doll winter easier :)

28.03.2016 15:31, Peter Khramov:

Citizens, I had a rocky obstructions on the larger than usual, somewhere in the week on the site will occur very rarely and thus finishing touch cards and supermarkets podzaderzhatsya. If something on the site is breath-taking and requiring early intervention during the week - mayaknite me directly in the phone, I went to / corrected.

28.03.2016 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Apatura / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.03.2016 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Apatura / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.03.2016 15:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chlaenius Chlaenius pallipes.

28.03.2016 15:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Misprint, though :)

28.03.2016 15:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chlaenius flavipes Chlaenius pallipes.

28.03.2016 14:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Chlaenius flavipes / Evgeny Komarov.

28.03.2016 11:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Badister / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Badister bullatus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

27.03.2016 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So they fall and adults usually appears, and then throughout the winter under the bark, sitting in a nest - waiting for spring :)

27.03.2016 23:30, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Send a link to yandex drive, there are almost 16 MB of photos turned out (just in case the whole series sent, you never know)

27.03.2016 23:22, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Well, today, too, went about picking the logs. Zhukov not, some larvae scored - may turn out to bring someone ... And ragiev these once in the fall and found, quite ready :)

27.03.2016 22:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Orsodacne Orsodacne cerasi.

27.03.2016 22:37, Evgeny Komarov:

I doubt more and more;) Can I mail in the second picture at its maximum size. E-mail a personal message!

27.03.2016 22:11, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Clear. In another photo he saw there pubescence approximately as shown here. So it seems like it affinis.

27.03.2016 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just today reminded
Today, in the city park kovyrnul bark of dead pine trees, and there is a lot of them in their "nests" sit. Wait until warmer.
On the topic of the day photo :)

27.03.2016 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

27.03.2016 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.03.2016 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

27.03.2016 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sericini Sericania sachalinensis.

27.03.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sericini Sericania sachalinensis.

27.03.2016 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sericini Trochaloschema armeniaca.

27.03.2016 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sericini Trochaloschema armeniaca.

27.03.2016 20:45, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I realized what you mean. Fixed.

27.03.2016 20:40, Peter Khramov:

Replaced.

27.03.2016 20:38, Peter Khramov:

We have to go and look again; -)

27.03.2016 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, in such cases, you can immediately put into supraspecific taxa

27.03.2016 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Theclinae.

27.03.2016 19:47, Alexander Korolev:

Basil, I - not a professional, I can be wrong. Therefore, the postscript: "Tucson determined inaccurately." Compares with pictures of butterflies subfamily Theclinae book - Butterflies of the world. Encyclopedia of butterflies. // SPb .: Izdat. SZKEO "Crystal". 2009. 208 p.

27.03.2016 19:40, Evgeny Komarov:

There's a pair of triple external gaps elytra small punctures with short, fairly thick hairs (at affinis), and at only distinguendus bristles on the edge of the elytra with individual hairs. Here it is clearly seen if http://carabidae.org/carabidae/Harpalus%20Harpalus%20affinis%203706.jpg increase.

27.03.2016 19:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Replace finally on the main page, upload pictures of Lepidoptera residual "phantom" - I mean that's "underside (bottom wings)." Do like the edit page.

27.03.2016 19:13, Nikolai Vladimirov:

From what I saw - pubescence is, however, difficult for me to judge what density it should be ...

27.03.2016 19:08, Mrhail Kruglov:

There would be less than the beast, I thought it was a wasp or hornet with a gnawed-off wings.

27.03.2016 18:56, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Thank ispravllyu at. For nomenclature not hijacking in a while ...

27.03.2016 18:54, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Thank you! I'll try, but one shot with a macro lens, pull seldom that I want :( Especially insect smaller than 5 mm

27.03.2016 17:09, Evgeny Komarov:

I do not undertake to photo. All major features, alas, not the top, and the size is not estimated. In Moscow there is something confused.

27.03.2016 16:51, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Ugums ... forgot ...

27.03.2016 16:34, Evgeny Komarov:

That's the same thing with this stranichki.http: //insecta.pro/gallery/55780

27.03.2016 16:10, Evgeny Komarov:

And here I am now, this bug slovlyu again and describe their actions step by step.
1. Open Photo # 55777: Rhinoncus castor.
2. I press the "Edit Photo" and normally get on page modify this photo (Russian version,
3.Zhmu "Display all photos" and got back in English!
Here you poshagovo.S any pictures of this algorithm, you get on the English version.

27.03.2016 15:53, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, throw a link to the page from which the link to "bring all the pictures ..." the blasted leads.

27.03.2016 15:51, Peter Khramov:

The photo will weigh less.

27.03.2016 15:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, now completely stable during the transition to photo editing, ie passes to editing one photo and then clicking "Display all pictures"
He throws in the English version. A dozen times already ..

27.03.2016 14:28, Evgeny Komarov:

But no secret :) This full size. I even larger with his equipment can not withdraw - a trifle two-trehmillimetrovaya already requires special optics, which, alas, no. Well, I gather the empty space, and that? Beetle is no longer simply become :) Cut from 800 to 800 frames.

27.03.2016 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Why so many empty seats, if not secret?

27.03.2016 13:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, it is not even discussed. Introducing unique.

27.03.2016 13:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.03.2016 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris brassicae / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Pieris melete / Female / Irina Nikulina.

27.03.2016 12:06, Peter Khramov:

Well, it's time to introduce a third the size of images on the site - the original)?

27.03.2016 11:23, Irina Nikulina:

This Pieris melete , the second-generation female. Volodya, if you're interested, all the explanations I have already written here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/24342

27.03.2016 8:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Amara / Nikolai Vladimirov Amara apricaria / Evgeny Komarov.

27.03.2016 8:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Amara / Nikolai Vladimirov Amara communis / Evgeny Komarov.

27.03.2016 8:39, Evgeny Komarov:

I do not exclude B. lacertosus. The genitals should look. But apparently closer to bullatus.

27.03.2016 8:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Nicholas, he no longer Platynus :)

27.03.2016 8:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Nicholas! Pictures, as always, excellent! Only now these "little animals" it is better to show here at the expense of larger artistic and framing. Not very important details can be studied.

27.03.2016 8:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Bembidion / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Bembidion lampros / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

27.03.2016 8:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Nicholas, look at the picture orginale - whether pubescence external gaps? If it is still there, then it affinis, and they come with blackened feet. In the picture a hint of pubescence seen, but only a hint. Perhaps it is only marginal bristles.

27.03.2016 8:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

27.03.2016 8:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus / Nikolai Vladimirov Harpalus distinguendus / Evgeny Komarov.

27.03.2016 8:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Microlestes / Nikolai Vladimirov Microlestes minutulus / Evgeny Komarov.

27.03.2016 8:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Platynus Limodromus assimilis.

27.03.2016 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alex, in his LC please contact the group is a photo and photo # 55741.
This is one instance.
P.S. And despite the fact that there is a binding to map fields "Photography Location / fishing" on the site has not been canceled. Please fill in)

27.03.2016 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A definition of the type carried out on a photo? :)

26.03.2016 23:56, Alexander Korolev:

Caterpillar is ready for pupation, crawling to dig into the ground.

26.03.2016 23:56, Alexander Korolev: This species is identified correctly.

26.03.2016 23:11, Alexey Samus: This species is identified correctly.

26.03.2016 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Fixed bug where some items in the total sample was not shown the form name, and outputs only the family or party.

26.03.2016 17:25, Irina Nikulina:

Euplexia japonica?

26.03.2016 16:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Peridea aliena / Irina Nikulina.

26.03.2016 16:29, Ivan Pristrem:

I kept waiting for the photo will change ...

26.03.2016 15:42, Alexander Korolev:

Vasily, thank you! I did not notice that a mistake has crept into the title.

26.03.2016 14:20, Yuri Semejkin:

I spend the winter!

26.03.2016 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.03.2016 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.03.2016 12:39, Irina Nikulina:

Peridea aliena

26.03.2016 0:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It was in the admin as a Hama n dryas amphinome

26.03.2016 0:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hamadryas amphinome.

25.03.2016 23:03, Peter Khramov:

Shtoto is a lot of 7-10 cm ...

25.03.2016 22:45, Mrhail Kruglov:

Scola giant did not like. My thicker.

25.03.2016 22:42, Mrhail Kruglov:

The PP mentioned some insect called "Gunda". Could you say - it's a legend, clean your "invention" or in Gunda is the real "prototype"? In general, the description Gunda most similar to Scola - a large earthen wasp (by the way, almost completely harmless). Anyway, as far as I know, on the territory of the former.USSR deadly insects like never done ...

Ivan. Moscow, Russia - 11/12/99

http://litrus.net/book/description/155062История with "Gunda" is almost exactly the same as the actual events that took place in the summer of 1956 at the excavation of the ancient fortress of Qala-i-Moog in Tajikistan.I myself am an entomologist amateur, but about the "Gunde" to find out it never managed to, although rummaging in different directories and pestering to professionals (even in those days). So the "secret of this is the great"!

25.03.2016 22:34, Mrhail Kruglov:

Somewhere in the 70 small rest in Odessa, in the holiday house "Lighthouse". And he saw an insect: they represented a wasp about 7-10 cm with rudimentary wings.. I saw it almost every day (I like the insects, specifically went to see). Then I read in Strugatskih description Gunda and more or anything not found. I would be grateful for any information.

25.03.2016 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put it in the race according to the assumptions. He started with the system they are even a little deal.

25.03.2016 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Encaustini Micrencaustes.

25.03.2016 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Further "tube" appear. It's hard with them ..... even those things ..
Erotilid there a lot, but at least the data (

25.03.2016 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Erotylidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Micrencaustes / Evgeny Komarov.

25.03.2016 21:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Subacronicta megacephala?

25.03.2016 20:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Hooray! She still survived! =)

25.03.2016 20:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Rhode Micrencaustes, and more ...

25.03.2016 18:45, Irina Nikulina:

Suppose you or Alexander. Sergienko look just in case. The 37 species of the region 5, and the image of all the rest - hedemannaria, inanata, neocervinalis and flavipes available on jpmoth.org and boldsystems.org. But in the family Rheumaptera

25.03.2016 18:36, Evgeny Komarov:

And for a glass of tea with pleasure, though Moscow I recent years, it does not add up - in fields away vacation! Including Come to Volgograd :)

25.03.2016 18:29, Evgeny Komarov:

What about different things, I already knew about :) Just when you write, do not always work to convey the idea ... Just like a biologist, you make me a little dumbfounded by their utterances. Evolution at least according to Darwin, even though any other, alas, will not be canceled. Therefore, the question "why" has a definite answer.

25.03.2016 17:56, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, we're talking a little about different things. I began by saying that the "why" is not a bug (or bugs to mind). At all. Can not. Bo "because it happened." We can continue in a particular topic, but I think it is unlikely to which we come (so long talking about different things). Then over a glass of tea to the most it: -)

25.03.2016 17:54, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I just clicked edit instead of Quote and zafigachit your back instead of your comments: -) Here I swear to God, nespitsalno!

25.03.2016 17:52, Peter Khramov:

We transfer?

25.03.2016 16:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, I agree.

25.03.2016 16:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Irina likely right.

25.03.2016 16:44, Irina Nikulina:

Butterfly and really interesting, but I think that this is the peppered moth of the genus Hydria, likely Hydria undulata

25.03.2016 16:37, Evgeny Komarov:

By the way, the discussion was amusing. Can we transfer it to the forum? There are other, perhaps, join!

25.03.2016 16:33, Evgeny Komarov:

"« Why beetle wings? "They told him not" why ", they have one, and he can use them for flight ."
I'm sorry, Peter, but they do it just "why": wings - the adaptation of the organism (species), giving him a definite advantage for resettlement, while looking habitat, sexual partner, food item.
At that point, it will not.Forms do not "most appropriate" arranged for survival.
What are you talking about?!!! What will not be able to survive in a fire? Flood? While many (living in conditions with regular fires and floods), can. I do not even know that this answer :) Are you under the concept VIEW imagine it? We're not talking about a single individual, and Video.

25.03.2016 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You deleted nearly all comments, not half. I do not remember it (do not keep a copy).
Subsequently be more careful with editing others' opinions))
And better not to touch it unless there is a mat and other excesses (they were not).

25.03.2016 16:17, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I'm sorry, I zaglyuchil and deleted half your commentary instead of an answer, write, pliz, again, I put back.

25.03.2016 16:14, Peter Khramov:

The question "why" is always applicable
Why did it happen? "Why beetle wings?" They told him not "why", they have one, and he can use them for flight.
Although the general response will always be so - the maximum suitable for the survival of the species in the ecological niche occupied .
At that point, it will not.Forms do not "most appropriate" arranged for survival.

25.03.2016 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Apatura iris / Yuri Semejkin.

25.03.2016 14:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Apatura iris (Linnaeus, 1758)

25.03.2016 14:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! The question "why" is always applicable, that's just the answer is not always clearly understood, but it is from our ignorance, although the overall response will always be so - the maximum suitable for the survival of the species in the ecological niche occupied.

25.03.2016 14:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! Here it is not about mimicry, but the konvergenitsii, ie species from distant taxonomic groups acquire similar features as a result of adaptations to similar environmental conditions. Therefore, here too, everything is understandable :). Lifestyle, including larva that lives in the dead wood of coniferous.

25.03.2016 14:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

And how about convergence?

25.03.2016 13:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it is clear why the insect listm imitate: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/49572

25.03.2016 12:37, Peter Khramov:

Basil, but perhaps the question "why?" In general applies to natural objects?

25.03.2016 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Generally amazing views.
I remember catching first thought: "Oh, barbel new for himself collected - it's great" )))
And there it was. Oedemeridae beetle appeared.
Generally surprising similarities) Why would he barbel emulate? The mystery, however)

25.03.2016 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sliding raspravilka best. Especially if you need to get more and feet (front and rear).

25.03.2016 10:34, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it seems, is not enough.

25.03.2016 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It will be a little in my opinion. For wider hawk moths better choose. They are thick.

25.03.2016 9:25, Peter Khramov:

Cleaned glitch when avtopodstanovochny search in a major search site line could not operate on the Russian names of taxa.

25.03.2016 8:37, Yuri Semejkin:

An interesting butterfly. Carefully I assume it Alucita? And 37 only 1 option A. eumorphodactyla?

25.03.2016 6:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sphinx morio Sphinx morio arestus.

25.03.2016 5:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

25.03.2016 5:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sphinx pinastri / Vladimir Bobow Sphinx morio arestus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.03.2016 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris / Yuri Semejkin Pieris melete / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2016 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When some people speak of it no doubt. And the question for a long time it is time to close.
That's close :)

24.03.2016 21:58, Peter Khramov:

The people who are dead head smoothing - 8 mm gutter is enough, right?

24.03.2016 21:56, Peter Khramov:

Irina first suggested about melete. That's authorship. Unless, of course, there is no doubt about the accuracy of determination.

24.03.2016 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As will be clear from such discussions, who identified .... then appear and will be rescheduled :)
Eugene, maybe you will deal and put a full stop?
I get lost (

24.03.2016 20:42, Evgeny Komarov:

And what is a photo still hangs before the race? Well, obviously the same for melete blackened veins. Well there is no such at Dulcinea. Or something I do not understand?

24.03.2016 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Dim, in such cases, at least so endure ...

24.03.2016 19:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieris / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.03.2016 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Blepharita amica ussuriensis / Oleg Pekarsky.

24.03.2016 16:59, Oleg Pekarsky:

Blepharita amica ussuriensis Sheljuzhko, 1919

24.03.2016 15:20, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.
I am instructed to repeat the photo shoot for this butterfly.
... As soon as the rains stop.

24.03.2016 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Moget))) why not suffered. Similarly, male.

24.03.2016 13:32, Peter Khramov:

Dim on makroklube even hint at Pieris mannii. Not moget?

24.03.2016 12:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Probably yes.

24.03.2016 6:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, of course.

24.03.2016 5:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, I wrote about it. I'll be back to the same Anisimovka, where the same type of terrain stretches approximately 4-5 kilometers along the road in from Anisimovka to Gribanovka and general point can just stand in the middle of the road, capturing the landscape with a radius of 2-3 km. But ...there are streams, to the narrow coastal zone which is attached a number of interesting species of ground beetles, and the crests of the hills above Gribanovka all other "fairy tale." At any one point in common is not enough. But, again, this is if Peter will be able to solve problems with them in the further development of this service to the species, etc.In principle, it is possible to dispense with the general and - well, not so much in our active members and, even if in 2-3 years or more, their number will double, the problem will not create these things, and if they will, then the problem will be solved by its admission :)

24.03.2016 3:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Stipulate that the total points can not be less than the radius of 1-2 km, and all this
Eugene! In most cases, yes, I agree. But what to do in cases where insects are attached to the plants common locally (dot), and the removal does not occur. Now I am talking about the parks and gardens, where there is a lot of people.Putting their biotope point, in this case, it did not seem very suitable? Probably in such cases it is better to put the general biotope point, even if it is incorporated into the overall big, with a radius as you suggest 1-2 km?

23.03.2016 22:03, Vladimir Deryabin:

Pieris rapae?

23.03.2016 18:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Limenitis sydyi / Yuri Semejkin.

23.03.2016 17:13, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, think about it. Ivan, yes, something like that is planned.

23.03.2016 16:43, Ivan Tislenko:

Is it possible to implement a binding photo to the point by entering the existing terms in the special field when editing photos? I have a lot of photos with a single point - it would be easier and faster to insert the point number in the appropriate field.

23.03.2016 15:06, Irina Nikulina:

Amphipoea sp.

23.03.2016 15:02, Irina Nikulina:

Agnidra scabiosa

23.03.2016 14:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Melanargia epimede / Evgeny Komarov.

23.03.2016 14:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, one more wish for the future, lapped with the same Plantarium. There you can view a list of your photos (own gallery) and see the photos, which are not tied to a geographical location. For those who have several hundred or even thousands of images on the site, it would be helpful.

23.03.2016 14:05, Peter Khramov:

All you can do, it is desirable not only to strengthen their foty to others' points before finally poreshat question in one way or another.

23.03.2016 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Just End, without Ctrl ; -) Ctrl + End for multiline text fields...
About maps - we'll see.

23.03.2016 11:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

23.03.2016 7:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Excellent ! Thank you, Eugene!

23.03.2016 7:20, Evgeny Komarov:

And you do not twist :) Ctrl + End

23.03.2016 7:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Then there al. Reason. Here probably only Peter can explain.
Ps. Do not be glitches on the map, move to a separate page? Separate from the Guardian website. And even so the wheel has to have a long scroll.

23.03.2016 7:02, Yuri Semejkin:

In short! With the common points - it seems that they have to turn off ........ Peter! And then what is recommended? Temporarily not produce on the map any action to clarify situatsiy.i advice. I would like to hear what you can do now on the map and what is not .....

23.03.2016 6:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, then I just do not what to do, even all site left :) Do not hochut all.

23.03.2016 6:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I was like. In my case, the reason was as follows. Not closed provided the previous point, for some reason, did not understand. We had to leave the card- switch to others. Snimok- take a step back and then to click on a picture that I want to bind. From that moment on, everything emerges and starts to work.

23.03.2016 6:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Only this: to eliminate common need to start editing the images attached to them - because already have points in common with the images of at least two authors. To be able to move them out to join her. Or he is somehow going to solve?

23.03.2016 6:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, that's a strange story with these photos Photo # 55386, # 55384, # 55383, # 46348.
They refuse to be anchored entirely. Those. The "snap to this point" does not appear in the window. Not only for them, and a new point is impossible to create!

22.03.2016 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.03.2016 22:32, Alexander Korolev: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2016 22:19, Boris Georgi:

Somehow, I can not learn to distinguish between them ...

22.03.2016 22:14, Alexander Korolev: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2016 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.03.2016 20:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Ok, Vasily! Just in case I have checked Danilevsky;) It's accurate!

22.03.2016 18:02, Peter Khramov:

People who have dry material excess to swap / sell / donate - please attend to laying out the case in the new section on the site, to revive the case, and the people reached out to us new ...

22.03.2016 15:23, Irina Nikulina:

I think that this is a different kind - Olethreutes captiosanus signs distinguishing captiosanus from close arcuella and subtillana, also found in 37 reg - on a PC in the median field has only 3 sparkles in a black spot and there is always sparkles between this spot and the dorsal edge of the wing vein of a 2 + 3 ( "DDA to insects," 5: Part 3, page 259.) You can compare on our website, for example, http: // insecta.pro / ru / gallery / 5656, where the 4th bright spot can be clearly seen.

22.03.2016 15:09, Evgeny Komarov:

So bright memory of him :) - points overall!

22.03.2016 12:49, Peter Khramov:

With the common points - it seems that they have to turn off just for technical reasons, as soon as we start to knit them not only photons, but also, for example, species. There generally is no place to bring the Old then, who generally view tied, and will complete nonsense ...
With regard to the radius of the newly established points - Okay, check it out.

22.03.2016 8:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Yeah, it happens :)

22.03.2016 6:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Sorry Eugene! Something I was blocked, not to get carried away.

22.03.2016 5:51, Boris Georgi:

By the way, yes. I, too, was that.

22.03.2016 5:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! No one has written so far - can I have one like this: when you install a new point, if I just ask her range, it is not stored, it remains 0. Only after re-entering through the editing, the radius is placed correctly.

22.03.2016 5:31, Evgeny Komarov:

And this is how? How to measure up the mileage? Scale and line on no map. Watch footage on the speedometer or Gaugeable steps? As -That's not clear.
I do not understand, Yuri? What do you mean, how? And the point of the radius of what we have in its properties? You put a radius of 2000 m and all.
Personal point in common-I like, but only as a biotope.For a small radius will make it easy to find the habitat of the object.
This is what is meant.

22.03.2016 3:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Stipulate that the total points can not be less than the radius of 1-2 km, and everything on it.
And this is how? How to measure up the mileage? Scale and line on no map. Watch footage on the speedometer or Gaugeable steps? As -That's not clear. You can of course go to the Earth, there is a possibility to make measurements. But whether it is necessary.Peter introduced the innovation now range in color, clearly was. Maybe this and sufficient? Personal point in common-I like, but only as a biotope. For a small radius will make it easy to find the locality object.

21.03.2016 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gryllidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.03.2016 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.03.2016 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.03.2016 23:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dicerca Dicerca furcata.

21.03.2016 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Aromia moschata orientalis / Boris Georgi.

21.03.2016 20:44, Peter Khramov:

Pressing the point now shows the radius of a circle. Editing accuracy of digital data (latitude and longitude) is increased.

21.03.2016 20:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Yuri rights. Members, guests will attach to the existing or create your point, and permanent participants always find a way to solve the problem (if such occurs), either between themselves or with the assistance of the administrator. In my opinion, too much attention to this problem. Stipulate that the total points can not be less than the radius of 1-2 km, and everything on it.And outside of this range can still put. And this does not preclude the formulation of new points within the radius of the existing common. Why? Simply because that is the radius, ie, circle, which includes very different habitats. I'm in the same Anisimovka put his particular point within a radius of total on the creek, becauselive along it quite specific types of ground beetles, not to move away from this creek below a couple of meters. Not all types are distributed as evenly as butterflies, although some of them are local.

21.03.2016 15:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cryptocephalus ochroloma / Evgeny Komarov.

21.03.2016 15:37, Yuri Semejkin:

1). And if these five authors at one point, some of them more clearly than others?
Yes, even at one point in 1000, and all of them all is clear, since they are all in the same radius. If someone enters the claimed range, it simply attaches to other pictures point, and in the absence creates a new one.
2). According to strangers. Yes, everything they can.They especially and do not need to negotiate. All that they need, is a simply attach pictures, similar to paragraph 1. In the case of surplus points to some areas of any author or representative of the administration of the site may come up with a proposal of any changes. everything is solved
3). Especially if one of them does not speak Russian ....In neighboring countries, but can not see any problems related to the lack of knowledge of the language. .... As far zarubezhyu._ Duck for them to have the English version of the site. So No problems.

21.03.2016 15:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Leptura annularis / Boris Georgi.

21.03.2016 15:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Leptura annularis / Boris Georgi.

21.03.2016 15:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Leptura annularis / Boris Georgi.

21.03.2016 15:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Archiearis parthenias / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.03.2016 14:22, Peter Khramov:

The value of the radius of the authors decide to let the pictures, they can always negotiate and come to a common opinion.
Nope, can not. Especially, if unfamiliar. Especially if one of them does not speak Russian. that only the author of the picture clearer, where he was filming
And if these five authors at one point, some of them more clearly than others?

and this resolves easier through mutual ContactsAbout resolves this easier through mutual contacts
Between the three men resolves. Sometimes, even among the five.But men do not so much on the site we have bu (I hope).
but the rules stipulate approach to their installation
Here let us and discuss the approach. Here it is what should be the approach?

With defaults - God be with them until the matter is not resolved at all, whether to stay on site shared points or not.

21.03.2016 13:53, Boris Georgi:

Aromia moschata orientalis Plav., 1934

21.03.2016 13:10, Boris Georgi:

Leptura annularis Fabricius, 1801

21.03.2016 13:09, Boris Georgi:

Leptura annularis Fabricius, 1801

21.03.2016 13:08, Boris Georgi:

Leptura annularis Fabricius, 1801

21.03.2016 11:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepyrus palustris / Tentatively identified Lepyrus / Confidently identified.

21.03.2016 11:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepyrus palustris / Confidently identified Lepyrus volgensis / Tentatively identified.

21.03.2016 11:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Rhode Lepyrus no options (Molytinae), but the view is even doubtful. In Siberia and in the east of Russia unknown to me a bunch of forms.

21.03.2016 11:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cleonini / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Lepyrus palustris / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.03.2016 8:40, Yuri Semejkin:

I spend the winter! Season 2016 is open in the Primorsky Territory! Flies have a min per week, but the lens only got today.

21.03.2016 7:22, Evgeny Komarov:

1. Peter, I did when I wrote "(which can still occur - do not come to mind) - the administrator dealing" - that, and wrote that comes to mind that has to do with the point, ie, need Edit "from the" have not seen.Well, what changes? The only thing that comes to mind is when creating a common point the author missed cool (it happens very few times nakosyachil) and set the wrong way, noticed immediately, but it is already attached your pictures to other users. Here so, contact the administrator likely. Although, when the possibility of editing points (ie,transfer pictures from one point to another, etc.) will earn in full, and this resolves easier through mutual contacts.
2. As regards the abolition of the common points: in popular mestah.vopros is not quite clear to me.Although nothing terrible can not see that, instead of one common point in the same Anisimovka will be a dozen, but good, I must say - too. We must think. Better to leave the common points, but the rules stipulate approach to their installation. And, Peter, the general point is now placed by default! Here it and is not necessary.Suppose that by default it will be personal! And as the author of the general will decide if he was approached and asked to make it general.

21.03.2016 2:56, Yuri Semejkin:

With radii like understood. It should be sufficient and a reasonable specific area. The point must be shared (I also do not like the version of points of different authors). The value of the radius of the authors decide to let the pictures, they can always negotiate and come to a consensus.In case of controversial issues, you can always go to the site and ask for advice, recommendation.
If someone comes to the point radius to another (-s), then do not worry. Over time, if the authors deem it necessary, they will join a point or change the radius, or moved them. There are always options.And do not be afraid that if there is a lot of authors. then there will be problems as dogovoritsya.Ved by points cover a certain area, so all newly emerged authors will only have to choose where to join (for others. Simply attach a picture). You do not have the part (modders and admins) to climb here.Basil Rights saying that only the author of the picture clearer, where he was filming. With a large range of values. This truth is it will not matter. Over time, all calm down, the radii will result in sootvetstvit and everything will be Ok!

21.03.2016 0:04, Peter Khramov:

Basil, but with a ruler from Google, unfortunately, there are some strained. In the plans it is, but we have finished yet. Probably the graphical display will appear radius than the line ...
Irina, if at all common points will not, you will need to search only their point among strangers. And it is enough to uncheck the show most of these strangers.With regard to common sense - very much like to, but there is a suspicion that, in the conditions of an unlimited number of users of each point will not be possible to agree: - (

20.03.2016 23:36, Irina Nikulina:

It is unfortunate that here too there has been some conflict (I thought that the common points is quite possible to come to some reasonable common variant interested authors (both literally 5 minutes we with Eugene turned out) "Let there be three points three different authors in one place "- that's me somehow do not like ..Do not agreed on a radius, for example, and I must at the same point or a little close to create their own, but with a large radius, which immediately absorb the previous one, and then, when I begin to attach photos, confused and increase until they split in two? ( (Have you tried it?Yesterday I edited the common point that was created by me before, and it happened to be close to the point of others. Author (this fact was not visible under a particular picture), and then could not attach anything to it, because in the "Sputnik" they do not share even at the highest magnification. Section only in the "Map" I moved her most.that it is not merged with another point. Honestly, I do not understand why you can be against increasing the range of reasonable ..? Let's say I put the 50 m and SAMA nominated point total, and another author takes exactly the same here, but covers a large area around and asks to increase the radius of, say, up to 200 m? So why can I be against if my area will go down in general? Just because the first designated this point? Like the post of Eugene from 19.19 "...just has to be a reasonable approach to this point, "It would be a reasonable approach for not such too problematic question (here, too, agree with Eugene) and less categorical. Do not really want to see the map overloaded with unnecessary points. This is my personal opinion, probably, remain in the minority ))

20.03.2016 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and you have no possibility to fasten a map tool to measure the distance from point A to point B?
If possible, the availability of tools will greatly assist in the correct fielding radius point.

20.03.2016 23:20, Peter Khramov:

Restrictions lifted on the order, "Add to Cart" button is activated. All lots are real. You can place orders, and add your own suggestions.

20.03.2016 22:30, Peter Khramov:

This is me to the fact that the author is more familiar with the geography of their own points, and no one has the right to climb to adjustments except himself:)
In social terms, though formally the author and one, in reality they can be considered somewhat (everyone who attaches his foty and other entities to the same point).
With regard to the public - I understand your opinion.I listen to more people. Who is for, who is against, who are thinking.

20.03.2016 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, by the way.
Do you know where there is a so-called geographically "Pine of comet" near the village of Old Omutischi, Petushki district of Vladimir region?
That's me to the fact that the author is more familiar with the geography of their own points, and no one has the right to climb to adjustments except himself :)
Single cancels the public. It will be quieter.

20.03.2016 22:08, Peter Khramov:

Basil, what you better know, is important for ne_obschestvennyh points. Once the point of becoming public, the author ceases to be a king and a god in its management.
In general, the more I look at all this, the more it seems to me that the "public" points you need to cancel. Let there be three points three different authors in one place.All the same, it will be clear, transparent and peaceful than coexist different people at one point. Even with control by the moderator. A person who will watch it all, Well Well, look at a few points, not one. But in response, each only for their markers and each of them is only the demand.
Say what?

20.03.2016 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aegomorphus / Confidently identified Aegomorphus clavipes / Tentatively identified.

20.03.2016 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aegomorphus / Confidently identified Aegomorphus clavipes / Tentatively identified.

20.03.2016 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

These two species are not that photo, and on collection materials and distinguished from each other in habit can not everyone.
So I put in inaccurate Aegomorphus clavipes.

20.03.2016 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strongly disagree. Moderator here can not make any decisions.
The point is purely personal point of the author's case. And to intervene in this area is unacceptable and simply incorrect.
I say immediately get up on its hind legs if someone from the climb in my point with their adjusted (move, rename, etc.) ((
Because I know my point better than anyone else.
Let's leave all responsibility for the created point on the author. I wrote him a letter with the wishes and he decides what to do.

20.03.2016 21:22, Peter Khramov:

On the basis of which the moderator may decide to move, rename, description, change the radius point, and the like?

20.03.2016 20:30, Evgeny Komarov:

So I wrote that it might - to work with your photos, tied to a common point. Move, delete the point - no. About obsuzhdaemo radius, perhaps for personal communication point, increase the radius. The rest (which can still occur - do not come to mind) - business administrator.And about a reasonable approach, I mean the variety of types of points when installing: first think, and then to set overall.

20.03.2016 20:06, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, here in this case on the reasonableness of the approach, unfortunately, is not enough to hope. When talking about the overall work, so just need to hard-code everything. What the author can not, and who may then, if he does not.

20.03.2016 19:19, Evgeny Komarov:

On the issue of common points, I think, not so much the problem, if a person puts an end to the properties of the general, so should understand that these properties should be at the point where many are collected (removed) now or in the future.Also here is an example - put an end to the total Anisimovka, Irina immediately wrote to its range covered more because she filmed a lot along the road to Sergei Anisimovka from the base. Well, obviously, there are still many people visited and will visit again.Well, and what rights should be in this case, the author? Yes, the right to own the pictures attached to this point, no more. Radius general point can also be changed, but abuse it is not worth it - resolution satellite images enough to within ten square kilometers instruct more than enough points of their own.Well, just to be a reasonable approach to these points and, above all, to think how to put a point.

20.03.2016 18:58, Peter Khramov:

Regarding what rights remain with the author's point after it added a photo of other authors - the issue under discussion. Let's discuss who believes.
Regarding the detachment and / or transport of photons from a point - provided, will soon open.
With regard to the points list - provided (similar to photographs and lots). Soon open.Regarding the images of the landscape - how to run a gallery of landscapes, these images can be secured to the points as well as basic. I assume here that they have to go to the beginning of the bag results point.

20.03.2016 11:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Crioceris duodecimpunctata Crioceris quatuordecimpunctata.

20.03.2016 9:05, Evgeny Komarov:

More specifically interested in the transfer of individual images from one point to another, or even delete individual snapshots from the point.
And this is just food for thought: on the author's personal page will be a button "My geographical point." Pressed - got a list of all of its points (number, name, description, range, location, number of attached pictures).Select one from the list and then redaktiruesh all that relates to it. Now editing points is very time-consuming (if there are many), because after editing one and save the changes, again forced to move to the "Map" tab, again look for the next point to be edited, and so with each point. Well, the last sentence: geographical points need to illustrate the landscape images.

20.03.2016 8:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Interested removal is not the whole point, and delete a photo from the point of order, to do more to the point is this photo. This provided?

20.03.2016 5:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! Let's go back to the bindings. That is the addition 3/19/2016 3:00 Petr Khramov
We put a point with a radius of 5 meters. They remembered that 10 meters of her rented forty photographs. It extends the range up to 30 meters, strapped new photos. And if not removed forty? And if not expanded, and left 5.
This is not correct.After all, for example, I set the radius of 30, but apart from me and removed others. They see my social point, and theirs shots do not fall within the radius. They are taken at 40, 50, 100 m from the point of my public. And they create a new one? I think it is not necessary to measure the radius of tens of meters, and put not less than 100-250 m Or something I do not understand?
Ps.At the moment, in terms of public author moves its contents, not just with your photos. It has been moved to point 151, and it was my picture on the idea that like only I could move. In this case, do not worry, I am satisfied with the author's allegations point range. But it should not be like ...

20.03.2016 2:24, Peter Khramov:

On the page, edit points, new possibilities:
1. Combining points (transfer of all entities (photos, species) from one point to another, followed by the removal of the one from which transferred).
2. Removal point.
The corresponding buttons are located below the map on the edit page.

ZY As for the gardens of butterflies, etc.- Confusion and the truth may be. Probably you will need to sign sgorodit "artificial locality" and display these points only for additional team, for example. Just get rid of them is not necessary, because on the map to see that in Moscow you can still flip morph if desired - at may also be useful.Oh, and by the way, Yuri, "Maps" section shows the georeferenced point, rather than the spread that whatsoever. The fact that dots of doplyasat can to some extent spread to - useful (but not only) investigation.

ZzyLord, remind the need prostanovki radius (using the page editing point) for the previously added marker.

19.03.2016 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, of itself, is provided.

19.03.2016 16:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, I strongly would not say, but about the same as writing-not see any reason to put points outside the natural range of the species, only to be confused, especially when the point will be displayed on the page type. To that! Peter, the possibility of remote points of their authors, and it will fall on your shoulders. And it is necessary?

19.03.2016 15:59, Yuri Semejkin:

When talking about the show, we had in mind the points show rather than insects

19.03.2016 15:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Or Aegomorphus obscurior. Photo overly-dramatic contrast, and the photo can not be said with confidence.

19.03.2016 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Buprestis Buprestis strigosa.

19.03.2016 15:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Buprestis Buprestis strigosa.

19.03.2016 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think Dicerca furcata

19.03.2016 15:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cleonini / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aegomorphus clavipes?

19.03.2016 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aegomorphus clavipes?

19.03.2016 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Aegomorphus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Aegomorphus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 14:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Curculionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Upis ceramboides / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 14:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ectinohoplia rufipes / Evgeny Komarov.

19.03.2016 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably Buprestis strigosa

19.03.2016 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably Buprestis strigosa

19.03.2016 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Buprestis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Buprestis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Dicerca / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Elateridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2016 13:43, Yuri Semejkin:

If there are no natural areas with dwelling insects, why do they show? What website do want to show - SCOPE insects or SCOPE OF HOUSES AND BUTTERFLIES. (Gardens).?
If you want to give to the house of the Old (the garden), then perhaps it is more convenient bude separate place. Like, individually housed units.

19.03.2016 12:56, Irina Nikulina:

More or less natural areas for South American and Asian butterflies, whose gardens are exposed, nowhere in Europe is there, not only in Moscow) Call point specifically on the name of the garden and the city - and to strengthen, I think it will be red NOTE) With Maak also understandable, but with the tropics of donated dolls, probably,it is not necessary to experiment, not the fact that they came from where stated.

19.03.2016 12:31, Peter Khramov:

Points on the type of page, as well as the selection of points on the general map of the parameters that will look.
Of course, Maak bred in Moscow, no relation to the Moscow itself does not have. Knit back where you took immature stages (if these stages butterflies were removed from nature, not from the refrigerator).
Regarding gardens - more difficult.It's one thing if it is more or less natural is for the kind of area, and another thing, if Moscow Butterfly House with morphine. In the latter case, if to knit, then with an appropriate note in big red letters.

19.03.2016 12:25, Peter Khramov:

I told you, it is different vesch)
ZY In the Personal Area - links to downloads and lots of editing and illustration to them. To have something to download - you can safely download.

19.03.2016 12:14, Evgeny Komarov:

I have such pictures (pin) are not attached - in describing the species has spread, if you know exactly where the pupae arrived (from the natural area) - this point and indicated. But for many types for many years bred outside their habitat, so there was nothing good will happen.But in the "gardens" to provide information that can be seen there, and can be fastened.

19.03.2016 12:00, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, maybe you need to register separately as attached to pin-point photo insects. And then, look, in the middle zone of the exotic has registered) ..For example, where to attach photos and Maak altsinoev bred in Moscow and Kaluga region? - The places where the pupa / tracks are taken, I think? But the tropics - to the places where the pupa arrived, if you know? Photos of the butterflies specially organized Gardens tropical butterflies are attached to the points of location of these gardens in different countries, right?

19.03.2016 11:58, Evgeny Komarov:

snap shots emergence of very well help in the selection decision on the placement or placement of the form image in the gallery, if it there are already many photos. And now we see immediately whether there is a kind pictures from the area (region) and, accordingly, the appropriateness of the placement.Many photos are not added, when he saw that there is already a half-dozen. Now I add, when I see a large "white spots". And when the points are right on the page of the form !!!

19.03.2016 10:45, Shamil Murtazin:

2. Option B

19.03.2016 10:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Worthy of particular point only because of geographical discoveries.
Vladimir Meshchora somewhat unusual for this type of

19.03.2016 9:46, Evgeny Komarov:

And not just like, but it is :) be signed seen a bunch of pictures and this has got to, and now on the signature and stuck without looking. Thank you!

19.03.2016 9:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arhopalus rusticus Trichoferus campestris.

19.03.2016 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.03.2016 9:14, Boris Georgi:

Something on Trichoferus campestris like more.

19.03.2016 3:00, Peter Khramov:

We put a point with a radius of 5 meters. They remembered that 10 meters of her rented forty photographs. It extends the range up to 30 meters, strapped new photos. And if not removed forty? And if not expanded, and left 5.In other words, I hope that at least a bit of common sense to the users is still there, and they are not required to drive in very very strict limits, artificially limiting the ability of the site.
Ph movements from point to point, and the like yet. But it will be.

19.03.2016 1:48, Yuri Semejkin:

With regard to accuracy. and radius. In some cases, the point can be supplied with up to 2 m radius. And is it necessary? And if I take others. Kind or other. Insect outside the radius point -to 3, 5 or 10 meters? Then I do not fit in the specified range.And what to do? Create a new marker? Duck so I whole area "plastered" Perhaps then it is better to specify a minimum radius of 50 or 100 m.? This is sufficient for understanding the place of the shooting.
And further. The site said about the possibility of moving from one point to another community. This kind of is not done, or a bad look?

19.03.2016 0:19, Peter Khramov:

1. The ratings, reviews and other such reputation. No more: the transaction takes place directly between the seller and the buyer.
2. What does it mean trimmed imports?

19.03.2016 0:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Cool initiative. I have something to live acquired =)

1. What is the situation with security 100% prepaid items?
2. I do not the seller, but imports from ibeya is still a private problem. Much more useful "trimmed" imports. Because Information is updated more often, plus it can be changed only in one place, and on this site it will change automatically.

18.03.2016 23:56, Yuri Semejkin:

I would say that this Limenitis sydyi Lederer, 1853

18.03.2016 23:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Erebia medusa

18.03.2016 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Start a new section - Market, which will be collected suggestions from our customers on the sale, exchange, donation (now) and purchase (in the future) of dry material - Insect entomological collections.

Main chips


1. Selection of items for a variety of parameters.
2. Binding taxa to the site directory, and therefore:
2.1 If the lot is not illustrated, the ability to use illustrations from the site directly in the total sample of lots (customizable daw on the right side of the page).
2.2 The selection of not only the parameters of lots themselves, but also on the types of parameters (similar to the section "Directory").
2.3.Tree taxa and quick links to the page view (or other taxon is bound Lot) and its parental taxa.
2.4. The total basket, from which the order is made in a single pass, regardless of the number of vendors, lots of which are selected by the buyer.

3. The rating system plus comments on the level of the lot and the seller.

4.Loading items via a web form and via spreadsheet files (in the latter case, you can download thousands of items in one sitting).
5. Loading illustrations for one and bursts through the zip-archives.
6. Setting multiple parameters at both the general level (the default for all lots) and at the level of individual lots (up to payment and delivery).
7.Setting up access to lots of information - from fully open to accessible by password only, or even the seller.

Nearest finishing touch after the trial period


8. Opening access to checkout
9. Adding to the "Offer" section of "demand" (ie, it will be possible to publish the application / offer to buy, not just for the sale).
10.Interface translation into English and the launch of the English version of the service.

Questions


A) To all: they like, dislike, something to add, subtract that Any of your comments and, again, questions.B) to the seller: but if your ads on any ebee can be exported here to the website with one click - it will be convenient? Necessary thing?
AT).For buyers: but if in addition to advertisements uploaded by our users registered on our site, will be displayed also expired ads from other sites (with limited functionality, but with the possibility of selection at the level of "their" lots) - a useful thing, huh?

ZY Questions B and C of different.In case B lots will be published in the usual way, just with less effort on the part of the seller. In the case of lots will be published in the trimmed - from the outside, not "our" sellers, but with a full selection. Those. Yes, it will be possible to select all male Chinese hawk moths from all involved resources.

ZzyProposals published now - expired. With real rates and real users.

Sample Example: beetles Cerambycidae family, from the United States, no more than 100 rub.

At the same time we try out new things, which later will go to the gallery and the catalog: the formalization of all countries (not just Europe), including:When you upload photos, automatic disclosure of signs involved in the right box, load and edit your data via spreadsheet files, two-level sorting of the samples.

18.03.2016 22:00, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you Peter, everything turned out)

18.03.2016 21:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, everything seems to be OK! I tried to move to the beginning. BUT! And why delete function points are not implemented (of course their own, not shared). It may be required.

18.03.2016 21:39, Peter Khramov:

The field will appear again if reload the page. Similarly with the rest. If, suddenly, will not work, restart completely (Ctrl + F5, and not just F5).

18.03.2016 21:12, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, everything is great, thanks! But I have nothing ((tested more than once. And about an hour ago suddenly disappeared from the map field "Searching for a location" in the upper right corner. I was engaged to the attachment points.

18.03.2016 20:31, Peter Khramov:

1. A new option for points - the radius (accuracy). Writing during the installation of a new point. You can choose from fixed values ​​or write your (in the latter case, do not forget to choose the unit of measurement - meters (default), kilometers or statute miles.
2. When installing a new point card automatically increases in size.
3.The card can be increased or decreased in size and manually - using the button "Open / Close" on the bottom right.
4. Open edit mode points. We are looking for a spot on any map, click on the marker, go to the link "Edit point".There, you can change all the parameters entered earlier (name, description, accuracy / range, common / uncommon), as well as coordinates. Coordinates change in one of three ways (what you prefer):
4.1. You can simply drag the marker on the map (and have dragged)
4.2. You can enter the coordinates in degrees with fractional part
4.4.You can enter the coordinates in degrees, minutes, seconds (including fractional seconds part)
If you drag the marker - immediately change the values ​​of the coordinates in all windows. If we enter the values ​​in the window after leaving the focus to another window, just go to the second conversion system plus shifts the marker.To confirm any changes be sure to click the appropriate button under the map.
ZY With the introduction of the system of coordinates vrunchuyu on the map may be slightly "rounded" values.
Zzy Please go to their points and put down for their range (Now all the old points raised zero).

18.03.2016 19:29, Evgeny Komarov:

But what of the occasion, as I write Me - Basil picture already identified :)

18.03.2016 19:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.03.2016 19:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Komarov.

18.03.2016 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Lilioceris merdigera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.03.2016 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Lilioceris merdigera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.03.2016 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cimbicidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.03.2016 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Diptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.03.2016 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

18.03.2016 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

18.03.2016 16:50, Irina Nikulina:

It Paratalanta sp.V Primorye 5 types, 3 of them look very similar - cultralis, taiwanensis and ussurialis. (Here all 3 -http: //www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Paratalanta.html) Pinpoint photo to form as written, VA Kirpichnikova impossible.

18.03.2016 14:14, Irina Nikulina:

Omiodes tristrialis , I think

18.03.2016 14:00, Irina Nikulina:

Hypsopygia iwamotoi gave explanations here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/3838

18.03.2016 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Earlier, Irina has been suggested by one of these photos: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/48392

18.03.2016 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia Cucullia artemisiae.

18.03.2016 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia Cucullia artemisiae.

18.03.2016 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia Cucullia artemisiae.

18.03.2016 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia Cucullia artemisiae.

18.03.2016 13:02, Oleg Pekarsky:

Oligonyx vulnerata (Butler, 1878)

18.03.2016 13:01, Oleg Pekarsky:

Cucullia artemisiae

18.03.2016 12:58, Oleg Pekarsky:

lucifuga

18.03.2016 12:05, Vladimir Bobow:

Well, Eugene dig into their photo archives, could still there.

18.03.2016 10:58, Yuri Semejkin:

In fact, put the first author who gave opisanie..V this case Milliere, 1879 A Nacoleia maculalis, as well as Dichocrocis sibiriflis, then that's all. In general, the whole thing of course taxonomists and curator of the site.

18.03.2016 10:15, Irina Nikulina:

We've got kind of Nacoleia maculalis In Sinev in comments to maculalis written - "The erroneous definition: sibirialis auct (nec Zeller, 1852)." All the previous set to maculalis. Although Asian sites, including the jpmoth.org, she - Nacoleia sibirialis (Milliere, 1879) http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Nacoleia_sibirialis.html It would be necessary to deal with this.

18.03.2016 4:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Epipaschiinae And then, without genitalia unlikely.

18.03.2016 4:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Nacoleia sibirialis Milliere, 1879 Determine Kirpichnikova VA Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS. Tucson is not exactly defined. To accurately determine the need genitals.

17.03.2016 23:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

To be honest, in Borneo (I feel) all Zhuzhlev shoot. But one (which I wrote under the photo) just a gesture, - as the acid.

17.03.2016 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I once our Carabus hortensis 20 centimeters so bummed that then his eyes half-washed .......
It seems to be not to shoot, but the shot hit below :)

17.03.2016 22:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Remember, this brilliant green shoot than hot, but harmless to the skin. Not this kind.

17.03.2016 22:09, Evgeny Komarov:

As for the shooting, hardly, just almost all ground beetles secrete a caustic and stinking liquid for self-defense.

17.03.2016 21:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Flying into the light. In my opinion, too, as the shot scorers

17.03.2016 20:52, Evgeny Komarov:

It is problematic to determine the shot - can not see the head and pronotum fine. The problem is that its range is to be Chlaenius pallipes, but because of the shooting side and the same light color can not estimate the pronotum and head. And then the impression that their color corresponds to Ch.variicornis, area which, according to "Red Tomiko" is limited to Primorye, but again painting elytral should then be black and green, and there seems to be exactly like pallipes. Vladimir, a different perspective (even photos unsuccessfully) not?

17.03.2016 20:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chlaenius / Evgeny Komarov.

17.03.2016 20:26, Evgeny Komarov:

But when the genitals look, then it will be 100%;)

17.03.2016 19:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eugene, if you look, why inaccurate then ???

17.03.2016 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Strange situation. Sometimes it really throws, but not always. While fixed screwdriver (throw just will not now) will deal in more detail later.

17.03.2016 17:22, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, on the site 9 days was not without poymu- changed something or temporary glitches? Today I did not work on the selection of search parameters. No author's detachment and geography - all reset and shows the whole gallery. Test according to several authors.

17.03.2016 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Brachyta / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.03.2016 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Brachyta / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.03.2016 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Brachyta / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.03.2016 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Oedecnema gebleri / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.03.2016 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Oedecnema gebleri / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.03.2016 15:23, Vladimir Bobow:

But how I did not think about it then, photographed last year in the country. And the experience of growing were not caterpillars. But last year inadvertently gusenichka hatched from eggs left Actias artemis, I tried to grow, there was one gusenichka, pupate, and some time later hatched butterfly. I released it on volyu.Tak that the first experience gained.

17.03.2016 14:48, Shamil Murtazin:

Vladimir, will grow? ..

17.03.2016 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.03.2016 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acronicta rumicis Acronicta catocaloida.

17.03.2016 7:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Yuri Semejkin.

17.03.2016 2:15, Yuri Semejkin:

The plant is defined as the BPI Vicia amurensis Oettel. Kohl Ira sure that eats the plant, then a new forage plant Acronicta catocaloida.
P.s. Caterpillar probably need to attach to http://insecta.pro/gallery/55256 group. Because this one individual.

17.03.2016 0:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Leucomelas juvenilis / Yuri Semejkin.

16.03.2016 22:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/addpages/Andrey_Ukrainsky_Library/References_files/Chujo89.pdf

16.03.2016 20:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, there is no problem, that's the time, alas, too. A great image appearance of almost all the species found here http://www.forestryimages.org/browse/taxthumb.cfm?fam=1547&genus=Eumorphus

16.03.2016 17:37, Yuri Semejkin:

But the picture on what the caterpillar was taken http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47398

16.03.2016 17:20, Irina Nikulina:

Here is the same track of Anisimovka http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55255, which passed on the following day, together with Jure fodder plant and which proved Acronicta catocaloida . For the determinant catocaloida DDA insects (part 4, that is, 5) and in the book of VSKononenko in feed Set only Mongolian oak, but I remember exactly that for a long time watching her, absorbing it bean, filmed (there's a photo of flowers nibbling it), and then packed in the rearing of Jura). Now we need to endure in catocaloida.

16.03.2016 16:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Carterocephalus palaemon ( Pallas, 1771)

16.03.2016 14:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It would (article) on the Russian shift, but with pictures on the keys.

16.03.2016 9:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Thank you, Dmitry! Though not "fresh", but very decent. BM I understood.

16.03.2016 9:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Erotylidae / Confidently identified Eumorphus sybarita / Tentatively identified.

16.03.2016 6:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais io / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.03.2016 3:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Calamotropha paludella (Hubner, 1824) picked Kirpichnikova VA Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS.

16.03.2016 3:09, : This species is identified correctly.

16.03.2016 0:49, Peter Khramov:

Can not be. Just fire tried to repeat - has not risen. Most likely, just by chance / mistakenly hit number in the appropriate box. Next time pay attention to everything and everyone, when you floor to do to, in which case, it would be possible to somehow repeat. And yet - a random glitch.

15.03.2016 21:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Gryllotalpidae / Vladimir Bobow Gryllotalpa orientalis / Evgeny Komarov.

15.03.2016 20:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Gryllotalpidae / Shamil Murtazin Gryllotalpa orientalis / Evgeny Komarov.

15.03.2016 20:58, Evgeny Komarov:

There is only one kind, according to the determinant of the DV, Volume 1.

15.03.2016 20:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Gryllotalpidae / Shamil Murtazin Gryllotalpa orientalis / Evgeny Komarov.

15.03.2016 19:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Gryllotalpidae / Shamil Murtazin.

15.03.2016 19:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Gryllotalpidae / Shamil Murtazin.

15.03.2016 15:36, Shamil Murtazin:

Gryllotalpidae

15.03.2016 15:15, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion it is the female Argynnis anadyomene C.Felder & R.Felder, 1862

15.03.2016 14:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Carterocephalus silvicola (Meigen, 1829)

15.03.2016 14:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Leucomelas juvenilis (Bremer, 1864)

15.03.2016 8:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it's necessary. To run, There is a need to send a lot of pictures at once. No one, as their "pick" :)

14.03.2016 23:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Rather yes! Let's try :)

14.03.2016 21:59, Peter Khramov:

We are looking for a point - see its number - set binding number for the heap ph (or vice versa, knit number to the point ph). Will?

14.03.2016 21:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, very binding group would not prevent. On Plantarium I occasionally mention these things implemented. Another thing is that related to the geographical location there are very "stiff" - from the bulldozer, without giving a detailed description of everything, you will not put. Here http://www.plantarium.ru/page/dwellers/point/2497.html is all one can see, although the details can understand and see the users - members of this resource.

14.03.2016 20:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Of course, I do not really thought about this idea ... They are generally not very correct. Does it make sense to do some kind of a list of points for each user? .. Well, that is so in the "geography" was not only his hands to write, but also choose from a list of a certain point? Or, for example, that there was a list of common points from which to choose.It's a bit to simplify binding big number of pictures to help you quickly add photos from the "standard" places.
P.S. How does the binding of one photo from the group to the point?

14.03.2016 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Ampedus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.03.2016 18:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Neptis philyra / Yuri Semejkin.

14.03.2016 18:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Neptis sappho / Yuri Semejkin.

14.03.2016 17:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Orthoptera / Vladimir Bobow Phaneroptera falcata / Yuri Semejkin.

14.03.2016 16:43, Peter Khramov:

In the photo page - the point is this image (already).
On the page of the form - it is the point of this kind (to be in the near future).
For supraspecific taxa - similarly.

14.03.2016 16:42, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you, Shamil! We wait!

14.03.2016 16:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander! Filter points for one species is no way. But it certainly is planned. The system is only oprobiruetsya and gradually acquires functional.

14.03.2016 16:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Phaneroptera falcata ( Pods, 1761)

14.03.2016 14:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis sappho

14.03.2016 14:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis philyra Menetries, 1859

14.03.2016 12:34, Alexander Belousov:

Point tied to the photo to see! When a tick off only one visible. Question shot! But not understand how you can see all the points of one kind? Tuplyu!

14.03.2016 12:26, Alexander Belousov:

I must again misunderstood something! Points put easy, I admit. But I open the photo affixed to the point, and how to see it? After the photo is tied to a certain point, and under it on the map anything, but it is not the point.Or see all point to, for example Colias erate? I now intended that it be so - opened the photo and looked at the bottom on the map all the points where "it" is found :-) Or the card for any other purposes. While neponyal what's the point to put the point? Just not to forget where caught / seen / Fota?

13.03.2016 19:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Article (not very fresh) on this family. http://hbs.bishopmuseum.org/pi/pdf/10(1)-79.pdf

13.03.2016 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Like a planned)

13.03.2016 19:25, Svetlana Shchavelina:

I'm sorry if the topic has already been discussed (read the whole discussion is no power). Personally, I'd be curious to see the map on the form page with all the marked points where items are posted on the site have been found.

13.03.2016 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have such a series is Peninsular Malaysia. The truth is not determined yet (hands do not reach).
According to the collector: the usual kind of there.
So, I think not only on Borneo, it is))

13.03.2016 18:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Right! Sam and adds Eumorphus sybarita in inaccurate, although the point can, and accurate!

13.03.2016 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it seems to me the representative Endomychidae
This is similar: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxonimage/id178971/?taxonid=698119
Eugene, better dig in this direction)

13.03.2016 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Konstantin Kraevsky Cerambycidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.03.2016 17:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Konstantin Kraevsky Enoplocerus armillatus / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 17:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For me personally, this knowledge is enough)))

13.03.2016 17:07, Evgeny Komarov:

That is the main thing that you need to know Dima :)

13.03.2016 16:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I know that they are smelly, if you take in hand. HIGHLY!!! There are small and there are horses (5 to 30 mm)

13.03.2016 16:49, Evgeny Komarov:

You could, Basil :) However, the lack of precision in the 'national' names is only confirms :)

13.03.2016 16:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Konstantin Kraevsky Ascalaphidae / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 16:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Konstantin Kraevsky Ascalaphidae / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 16:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Konstantin Kraevsky Ascalaphidae / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The Russian understanding Erotylidae is "Fungi" and they stand in Cucujoidea.
A Mycetophagidae this "caveman" and they stand in Tenebrionoidea.
Quite different beetles.
Both families are represented in Russia
Somehow, "here is a pair of shoes" :)

13.03.2016 16:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter spent a replacement photo # 2999 on the larger picture, because it was problematic to determine. Everything went OK, replace, but replaced the picture disappeared, and replaced the photo number 3000. As a result, we have doubles of different size, and the original photo №3000 vanished!

13.03.2016 16:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry, in English this fungus beetles, ie fungus beetles (caveman). However, the caveman (in the Russian sense), this family Mycetophagidae. Alas, Russian, as well as any other - anything to do with taxonomy have not.

13.03.2016 15:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Konstantin Kraevsky Anartia amathea / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 15:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing close to carrion)
Even infraorders they are different.
A stink and those and others))

13.03.2016 14:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stinky. Someone has said that close to the carrion

13.03.2016 13:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Here is a copy of almost five years in inaccurate. I found the source code and replaced the normal size. Specialists on the copper-butterfly! Maybe after Alexis?

13.03.2016 13:37, Anna Gerasimova:

Peter, I do not see the changes. I had also had a suspicion that these display issues due to the small screen (used to be for me), but the 15 "should also normally all look like? Now if I go to the theme" On the 8th of March! ", Part of the picture goes under news. well, scrollbars course only create aesthetic inconvenience.Although the pages of taxa would be more convenient to list the smaller fall out when you move, and does not scroll.

13.03.2016 13:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Konstantin Kraevsky Agrypninae / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 13:14, Evgeny Komarov:

In my opinion, Chalcolepidus sp.

13.03.2016 12:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Yet Actaeon. On the female still I looked, but still not sure.

13.03.2016 12:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Megasoma mars / Imago Megasoma actaeon / Male.

13.03.2016 12:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Konstantin Kraevsky Megasoma actaeon / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 12:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Perhaps, and M. actaeon - on areas closer, but it was too shiny and angle does not say exactly.

13.03.2016 12:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

13.03.2016 12:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Konstantin Kraevsky Megasoma mars / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 12:11, Peter Khramov:

Hooray! New foty Guyana! Old-timers remember, and waited!

13.03.2016 11:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mantidae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 11:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Konstantin Kraevsky Passalidae / Evgeny Komarov.

13.03.2016 11:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Of course the confusion, but certainly not now to get involved - pure tropical-subtropical southeast Asia.

13.03.2016 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I messed up here in my opinion.
Encaustini Crotch, 1876 is a kind of tribe standing in the subfamily Erotylinae: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id309497/
Activities It is necessary then.

13.03.2016 10:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Most likely, the race Micrencaustes Crotch 1875. True to our database, it is not.

13.03.2016 10:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Erotylidae Encaustinae.

13.03.2016 0:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How else would deal with these comrades?
In my case, too - joints ......
There unspecified number. species, but where and how to identify them I have no idea (

12.03.2016 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

May be. Or maybe not.....
At most like this or this http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/53758 37 pieces in the collection is uncertain of Peninsular Malaysia.
I do not know which side to approach them (
Ruteliny tropical, you know .......

12.03.2016 21:12, Peter Khramov:

WMS at least one kind of?

12.03.2016 21:10, Peter Khramov:

From the author can kanesh, and without FB Contact: -) Soon I will write to him about the photos ne_babochek, at the same time ask about the underside.

12.03.2016 21:08, Peter Khramov:

About the scale - too much. Even as it is now is not always clear where we are all on the map, often have to "waste".
Before editing is likely to be more open setting "Radius" (accuracy) for points.It is, in principle, ready, there ought only dolepit ability to enter different units plus free quantities (not only fixed values).

12.03.2016 20:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Written, waiting

12.03.2016 20:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Such bronze for a minimum of three kinds. They differ in size.

12.03.2016 20:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Male Female.

12.03.2016 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it's time to edit the test. With all this it is clear everything :)
At least four options that I have outlined in my post from yesterday. 03.11.2016 7:41
And that is already full ponadelal points and now it is necessary to have someone to move into new, more detailed terms. Fortunately innovations now allow such things to do.

12.03.2016 19:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitri, and know the name of the Frenchman? I would say that this grandis, which is not indicated for the islands.

12.03.2016 17:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The most common barbel in Tama. Pieces 5 per night arrives precisely.

12.03.2016 17:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The Frenchman, special for this group, which I collected beetles and beetle, said that the green was previously unknown on Borneo. Says this invasion from Sumatra or Java.

12.03.2016 17:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This year also found. Thought barbel, but mordoy- typical lozhnoslon

12.03.2016 17:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not barbel. It lozhnoslonik. In general, it is interesting)
In Asia, there are species that are under long-horned beetles mow quite successfully :)

12.03.2016 17:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I understand this is not barbel)))

12.03.2016 16:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Strange. I like you all send barbel))) We need to look at the training camp last 2 years. Beetle there's not uncommon (3-5 pieces a week I have seen, although not particularly looking for them)

12.03.2016 16:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Most svolochnoy beetle in Borneo. His shots burns the skin to the meat. It remains an orange stain and wound hurts week.

12.03.2016 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, you give me such Dmitry did not send. It is only at Eugene.
Eugene, still you need to be contacted with the spices, about which you wrote. I'm afraid that without this in any way here.

12.03.2016 16:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

ZIN directory, I still tend to trust (on Borneo), do not understand why you dig species not listed for Borneo (even if they are there and there), but did not see the kind of 100% have been found on the island (spinosipennis Breuning, 1958 and angerona angerona J. Thomson, 1865). In my opinion they should be checked in the first place and dig description spinosipennis.
Beetle as I understand it in stock. Basil, I'll send this kind of too - see.Perhaps there is still me or Sanycha.

12.03.2016 16:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where indicated? In the sense that all of these instructions there the kinds of matter rather dubious, considering that in the present subgenus 2 double at least.
Here it is necessary spices to barbel Borneo show clearly :)

12.03.2016 16:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For all katalogam- cantor mainland, grossepunctata- Lesser Sunda Islands. But I have not found spinosipennis)))

12.03.2016 16:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For Stiroglenea subgenus for the Borneo states 2 vida- spinosipennis Breuning, 1958 and angerona angerona J. Thomson, 1865

12.03.2016 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now it worked fine)
It bears on the photo page uvlichit default scale of approx. 5 clicks on the plus (subjective opinion).

12.03.2016 16:09, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and that there can not do so? Now by default you must crawl satellite, and the scheme by pressing the plus point is given infa about the author and co-ordinates.
Yuri, here we come to the separation properties of the "point" and "discovery". The idea is what you write (and related information) refers to the "discovery" rather than to "point".But, probably, until they can be combined into one unit. And maybe it is not necessary to combine. Obsuzhdaemo.

12.03.2016 15:24, Yuri Semejkin:

3. If the fit-to-point information about the discovery or that "he saw And what is there, but the place of shooting (fishing)? But some prefer to keep the bugs at certain plants and not only those listed in the literature.Some beetles, wasps are found under the bark of living and (or) the dead (rotten) trees, the larvae of some urostilidov also found under the bark, and the pupae of certain butterflies, etc. Names of woody and herbaceous plants against insects, etc. This infa actually need, Ali nafig?

12.03.2016 15:10, Svetlana Shchavelina:

The author can be contacted via the MICEX: https://www.facebook.com/ColinHuttonPhotography/?fref=ts
Usually, if the model is sitting still, photographers do a bunch of shots, then choose the best.

12.03.2016 15:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"was opened by the output of information about the author points (referring) and the coordinates of the point."
"Changed the default display mode for the satellite with the signatures."
Peter, I do not see any changes. Or is there something wrong?

12.03.2016 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that's a third option ....
Dmitry, from so simple?

12.03.2016 14:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Once this phot. no more

12.03.2016 14:30, Peter Khramov:

Try again...

12.03.2016 14:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Abisara / Imago Abisara fylla fylla / Female.

12.03.2016 14:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sorry, the page you were looking for cannot be found.

12.03.2016 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Wrap mona mona or not?

12.03.2016 14:16, Peter Khramov:

Here is a gallery of photos, take a look at off adjacent fotah maybe there tama underside: http://www.colinhuttonphotography.com/p700533641

12.03.2016 14:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I am confused nedokrashennoe belly. But for the 100% needed underside. Let's not oritesom

12.03.2016 14:08, Peter Khramov:

By following the system sees about binding species and other taxa to the points on the map:
1. If the point tally images, automatic and fit taxon this photo. If the photo is changing taxon (for example, to determine the exact or corrected an error in the definition), then automatically changes the taxon and the point.
2.If the fit-to-point collector's item (in the case of the revival of the system of reference collections on the site, and it we seem to revive soon on a new level), then it fits and his (instance) taxon - similarly as in the case of the photo.
3.If the fit-to-point information about the discovery or that "he had seen 100 pudoff" (but copy or photos can not find), then bind to the point taxon directly indicating that the source of the data - our personal message.
4. If we do not knit its information, and for example, the data from literature from other sites, etc.- Indicate the source of data (as in the case of information about a dobalveniya) plus un-subscribe in a special window comments (where exactly in the source has information about finding the kind here, etc.)
Say what? There is something else that can be useful in this kind of binding?

12.03.2016 14:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The most common Glenea (Stiroglenea) angerona angerona

12.03.2016 14:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I have also turned female)))

12.03.2016 13:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Let him. Maybe this year will be able to know better angle to shoot.

12.03.2016 13:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I looked :), but neither of which I can not say yes. And in these types of moles is difficult to determine, and angles are not very much. Let it be as defined.

12.03.2016 13:32, Peter Khramov:

Opened display information about the author points (referring) and the coordinates of the point.
Yes. Gentlemen, if you know of any similar services, and interest in them chips, which in this map service is not (and I do not write, they would soon open) - write about it, and indicates a link to a resource where it is implemented. Seeing as gritstsa ...Changed the default display mode of the satellite with the signatures. Note on the general map of signatures (even the names of countries) will start to appear when you zoom in (unlike the previous version, when the main titles were visible at once).

12.03.2016 12:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Shamil is to Peter :) And much it is necessary? Opened here in satellite imagery mode, simultaneously opened GoogleEarth, found this point there and got the coordinates. I have this procedure in reverse order constantly did when I put the point.

12.03.2016 12:41, Shamil Murtazin:

I have a question. How to view the coordinates of a specific point? For example, if you wanted to see it on another card ...

12.03.2016 12:34, Evgeny Komarov:

I did not see your last post :) I wish I knew whether there cantor on the islands.

12.03.2016 12:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, judging by the discussion, grossepunctata and cantor are very close, and the spread of the second on the island is not clear, but the first there. I believe that it is possible to write in inaccurate grossepunctata, let alone their relationship with the cantor - there the matter specialists. I then still send this photo spices, recommended Danilevsky.

12.03.2016 12:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Almost sure Glenea cantor obesa var. vitticollis Breuning, 1958: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id1155117/ (where, in similar types listed Glenea grossepunctata , which thought in the beginning).
While I can not stand: still need opinions)

12.03.2016 11:42, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Generally - Lake Pang Ung - mining. There is much cooler than in the plain, in the morning - fog. On the shore, even pines. Altitude and have not found, Google did not help ........

12.03.2016 11:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, I think felt something :)
Look, please: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=15494
There, the truth from the peninsula, but by habit we can say that one in one.
A general answer is simple here: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=15011
Generally, these are more things Glenn ......

12.03.2016 11:07, Evgeny Komarov:

But! Something I tupil here for a long time :) TBD - Vasily beat for 8 minutes.

12.03.2016 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monopis pavlovskii / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

12.03.2016 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Thyestilla gebleri / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.03.2016 9:52, Yuri Semejkin:

I uploaded in addition to http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55391. Because It is best seen unlike the similar M. monachella. But you still need to check. Alexander ! You look?

12.03.2016 9:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, quite clean, it is not worth it, people are different, can those who are not accustomed to using satellite images and regime have to leave? It's me, accustomed to the orientation it so well. Not all photographers and travelers still :) Entomologists something on any such.

12.03.2016 8:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Monopis pavlovskii (Zagulajev, 1955) ? http://www.jpmoth.org/Tineidae/Tineinae/Monopis_pavlovskii.html

12.03.2016 8:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, actually remove the card mode. There is no sense of it.

12.03.2016 7:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesperiidae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

12.03.2016 7:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Similarly for! I immediately switches - to navigate the card virtually impossible mode.

12.03.2016 2:22, Peter Khramov:

Ooi.

12.03.2016 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think you know better :)
Decide, Dmitry)

12.03.2016 0:18, Svetlana Shchavelina:

According to the book turns Abisara fylla fylla, female.
Just spread - the north of Thailand.

11.03.2016 23:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Further in the book, Svetlana

11.03.2016 23:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Abisara.

11.03.2016 23:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Appias olferna / Female.

11.03.2016 23:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and not whether it is male Catonephele acontius ???

11.03.2016 22:58, Peter Khramov:

You this to the "blogs" or what? ..

11.03.2016 22:56, Peter Khramov:

Technically possible. But because such situations are infrequent, it is a working version - only this.

11.03.2016 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I am for.
Simply navigate to.
And with a layer Wikimapia all the charm :)

11.03.2016 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Citizens, not whether to make the default display mode "Sputnik"? With signatures essno ...

11.03.2016 19:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pyraloidea / Evgeny Komarov Notarcha basipunctalis / Yuri Semejkin.

11.03.2016 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have already appeared similar reasons :)
Therefore please open the editing.
Do not tighten with the case as possible.

11.03.2016 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not disappear by neohodimo I saw myself already)))
And Wikimapia screwed anyway. The necessary thing :)

11.03.2016 16:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Notarcha derogata book Ognёvki fauna of the Russian Far East, on p. 398 is listed in synonyms. A major name is Notarcha basipunctalis Brem
Probably it is necessary to carry .....

11.03.2016 15:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I tend to version Notarcha basipunctalis (Bremer, 1864) = N.derogata F. In Primorye, 2 species, but the 2nd type N. maculalis Leech front wings dark brown. So on these and other signs disappears.

11.03.2016 15:42, Peter Khramov:

«link at the very Wikimapia: http://wikimapia.org/ time and the need to write descriptions of the geography in the points will disappear by itself.»
By the way, I'm not stuck, why is it no longer? Yes, there are more facilities, but it's just easier viewing, snapping, the description, but it does not eliminate the need ...

11.03.2016 15:40, Peter Khramov:

Just just be an excuse potestit editing ...

11.03.2016 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Present!

11.03.2016 14:26, Peter Khramov:

Nothing would be worse than not; -)

11.03.2016 14:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Costa Rica, Peru, French Guiana (not to be confused with Guyana: two different states) already have more points :)
Later will be Argentina, Brazil, and in my opinion something else. Just had not yet reached. Photo is on my site is already full and it is impossible to bind all at once)))

11.03.2016 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He added and suffered. There was no need to ask add or not :)
Naturally add) I just do not always have the time for it.

11.03.2016 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pinthaeus sanguinipes Picromerus lewisi.

11.03.2016 13:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesperiidae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

11.03.2016 13:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesperiidae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

11.03.2016 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Basil, Add?

11.03.2016 12:18, Peter Khramov:

With regard to rights - will do. With regard to Guyana - I'll write to Constantine.

11.03.2016 12:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Excellent! And America will be, that's just there just have more often the state to put an end. And just about it: at one time a bunch of pictures downloaded from quite a decent indication of geography. This refers to the ph K. Krajewski of Guyana. He was already on the site is not very long ago, and some of their tie? Those. again about the right not to bind their pictures!

11.03.2016 12:00, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, Basil, yes, these features are unlocked and a couple more in the foreseeable future.
ZY Something we have almost no points for North / South Americas. A white spot on the map straight ...

11.03.2016 11:54, Peter Khramov:

Anna is now corrected, everything should be rules with pictures (unless you do not have a very small screen).
Regarding bands - yes, may appear again if the screen is not very large. But what they were in this case interfere? Visually?

11.03.2016 11:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Male

11.03.2016 11:51, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.03.2016 11:45, Eugene Karolinskiy:

male

11.03.2016 10:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Move and add to the database. The specified Tucson. Pictured Picromerus lewisi Scott, 1874. This final determination! He clarifies: Kanyukova EV Zoological Museum FENU (Vladivostok).

11.03.2016 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.03.2016 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.03.2016 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Irek Yusupov Hyles gallii / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.03.2016 9:14, Evgeny Komarov:

And in terms of the form page! :) Then absolutely super!

11.03.2016 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Peter.
Much better now looks. Now the point of the heap can be planted on the map :)
It is time to open the edit :)
Offhand seen 4 main options:
1) Change the attribute personal / obshestvennaya
2) Edit the description of the point.
3) Removal from the point of their photos in order to place them in another (more) point.4) Move the most points to another location (for cases when it is initially mistaken).
Deposit is to be available at the point of moving conditions if it is "personal" or other users have not yet adhered to her own photo.

11.03.2016 7:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Everything works fine!

11.03.2016 0:25, Peter Khramov:

Open to the public access new features and changes:
1. Now in the general map and the map in the photo, you can choose which show the point, and which are not.
eleven. In general the default map displays all the points.
12. On the map image:
1.2.1.If the point is not already installed, then (only for photos of the author) displays his point and general terms (so you can quickly decide to set a new point or knit to the already existing).
1.2.2. If the point is already set, it is displayed only.
13.And general, and on the private map using the check boxes, you can instantly change the settings (to withdraw more or less on the type of card points).
2. Reduce the size of marker icons in the legend, so they take up less space.
3. Increased the default scope for a photo card.
4. On the general map shows the number of points of each type.

10.03.2016 22:38, Peter Khramov:

"It is possible that in this case it is sufficient to describe the picture?"
Eugene, and need not be limited only oobsuzhdenie fotami. The types will also knit, for example. And there is not enough data in the caption to photographs. There must be a clear point of the property.

10.03.2016 22:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Calliptamus / Confidently identified Calliptamus italicus / Tentatively identified.

10.03.2016 22:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Fedor Ovechkin Calliptamus / Evgeny Komarov.

10.03.2016 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #55290 group.

10.03.2016 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #55287 group.

10.03.2016 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

10.03.2016 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

10.03.2016 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

10.03.2016 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

10.03.2016 20:06, Evgeny Komarov:

And just about the ability to put the geography to others' pictures. Vasili expressed his opinion, but if the moderators, at least, will not be able to snap pictures of others, will lose a lot of information about the distribution of species. Yes, it is not always an exact geography (it is discussed in the post above).Doubtful indications (here you can color label, or something else) is worth discussing. Speak, colleagues.

10.03.2016 19:56, Evgeny Komarov:

It is possible that in this case it is sufficient to describe the picture? There in fact is precisely the vicinity of Serpukhov? Those. You do not need to "fence" the additional complexity?
Something no one but me, and there in the discussion of Basil not active! Or because the two of us started yet actively use it?
Colleagues! Opinions needed! "Fitch" in fact extremely useful and interesting!

10.03.2016 19:44, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, editing / transfer will be available soon.

10.03.2016 19:44, Peter Khramov:

Yes, but you need to make it clear that this is not exactly in Serpukhov on Ulyanov street, namely the neighborhood. Those. shall be the property of the point, "they say, is not correct, the radius is greater than 1 km." Or 1 km away and something else.

10.03.2016 19:09, Evgeny Komarov:

I'll wait, no problem! Although easier to remove and I put them in place - something only my point.

10.03.2016 18:17, Fedor Ovechkin:

Platycnemis pennipes, ♂ и ♀.

10.03.2016 18:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

Platycnemis pennipes, ♂.

10.03.2016 18:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

Platycnemis pennipes, ♂.

10.03.2016 18:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

Platycnemis pennipes, ♂.

10.03.2016 18:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notocelia tetragonana / Tentatively identified Pammene insulana / Confidently identified.

10.03.2016 17:54, Sergey Novitckiy:

Vitaly Kavurka (Іnstitut Zoology. II Schmalhausen NAS) brewed this instance. It turned out - Pammene insulana.

10.03.2016 15:26, Fedor Ovechkin:

Aeshna crenata, ♀

10.03.2016 15:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

Sympetrum flaveolum, ♀

10.03.2016 15:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

Sympetrum flaveolum, ♀

10.03.2016 14:59, Evgeny Komarov:

"With regard to bind to a single point, or still put different - once again return to the question of accuracy" .

In my opinion there is no problem here. If the author is aware of the point with an accuracy of up to a dozen, fifty, and even hundreds of meters - one conversation - to put an end, if not the same as existing in the same radii.Such points, with the available resolution satellite imagery of Google, easily put, if you are well familiar with their gathering place even without GPS, and is well More info about the type of habitats. Well, if you have an insect (photo) with the label "Ochre Serpukhov.", Then knit to Serpukhov - other options do not see. Therefore, common sense only.

10.03.2016 14:47, Fedor Ovechkin:

Sympetrum danae, ♂.

10.03.2016 14:47, Fedor Ovechkin:

Sympetrum danae, ♂.

10.03.2016 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Melitaea phoebe / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.03.2016 14:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Melitaea phoebe / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.03.2016 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, if possible selective screening marker points would be better to do on a minimum radius)

10.03.2016 11:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! Attached picture is not to the public at. Perhaps al. Also with the same face. Therefore I, at least at first, if possible, provide a picture moving from one point to another. As Basil offered. Or, as an option to be able to detach his own image, then to attach the right place.

10.03.2016 11:40, Peter Khramov:

Selective Display, different scale, etc. - All this is done, will soon open on the site.
Regarding knit to a single point, or still put different - again suggest that we return to the question of accuracy. For example, there are markers with a precision (radius or diameter, obsuzhdaemo) 100 m, 1 km and> 1 km.And, accordingly, the author can put a big point Torbeevo, and her knit a bunch of insects (but then it is a point more than 1 km) or to put a lot of individual, but more accurate.Special restrictions in the number of dots on the maps not in the group they are going (to visually block the entire map), so if you can, why not put more accurate?

10.03.2016 11:19, Peter Khramov:

Maybe it is to leave, and then otredaktiruesh? Editing already open soon ...

10.03.2016 11:08, Evgeny Komarov:

We look forward to Peter! But things such as selective screening points are implemented on the same Plantarium. Another question, as far as really here to do, and what it will cost :)

10.03.2016 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Basil, I was referring to a single point to show a photo (the others are not shown), rather than a" game "in the scale of the window."
Eugene, this is certainly the best option. But I think that it can not be done technically.
But zoom by default picture that is already tied is feasible.Regarding the participation in relation to the photo card - a private affair of the authors photo and no one has the right to oblige them to do it.
Moreover, no stranger shall not bind others' photos on geography, which is written to the picture not to themselves.
It is full of pictures with Undetailed, and often with a rather dubious geography.Therefore, in this matter let it be as it is.

10.03.2016 10:10, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, I was referring to show single point to the photo (the others are not shown), rather than a "game" in the scale window. Moreover, such a large scale in the view window will require a mandatory reduction of its viewing to understand the real location.In your example, because it is not clear exactly where this point, Moscow, St. Petersburg, Vladivostok? Until zoom out, you will not understand.
Oh and one more thing. Now and fear, in the long term, the number of points determined by the activity in the case of several participants. A tie pictures only their authors are today.So many pictures (thousands), laid before the given features, without an anchor. And now there is a feature, not enjoyed by all. How is it going to do?

10.03.2016 8:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Open photos (tied) - One can see the point.!"
Eugene, that's what I mean. )
In my example, the distance between the grind to the nearest approx. 650 meters:

In the proposed version of the scale of credit default bdizhayshey point it is no longer visible.This is a huge advantage: it will be possible to put a point on the map much more heap than do it now without the risk that they will be merged into one map to a particular photo.
The solution lies on the surface - you only pick up)))
Peter, please note)

10.03.2016 6:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Ivan Pristrem Orphilus niger / Evgeny Komarov.

10.03.2016 6:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, there is, and I had kind of thought the following: when you open a page with photos attached, we are interested in the place of shooting, fishing.Why see the extra points that do not belong to the photo? If the photo is not bound, then yes - it shows all available points have to choose - to link to an existing or create a new one, and what is already tied to?
As a result, the ideal (in my opinion) the next. Open the photo (tied) - see point.One! Open the page of the form - see all the points where specimens of this species recorded at the site. Is it possible to implement, Peter appears to say.And it seems to me, may not need the window with the map on the type of page? Maybe its just cause "button" and it will be fine to turn even the whole screen? And active "button" only attached photos.

10.03.2016 1:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In addition to the previous post :(
The distance in a straight line from the point to the st. Nameless approx kilometer.
To measure the distances used SAS.Planeta loaded with a Google map in it:

That is in my opinion the idea about the true zoom. It will be painless.And the "extra points will not be visible :)
Unless, of course it is technically possible to implement?

10.03.2016 1:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bombus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrididae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 1:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Irek Yusupov Odonata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Irek Yusupov Aglais io / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Irek Yusupov Aglais io / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tettigonia viridissima / Imago / Irek Yusupov Tettigonia cantans / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.03.2016 0:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In viridissima long elytra)
Here T. viridissima: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxonimage/id18007/?taxonid=147
I do not know whether there is, in view of the Perm region. He's kind of southern :)

09.03.2016 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tettigonia viridissima / Imago / Irek Yusupov Tettigonia cantans / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Well, well at least the door has not yet been closed down and that in fact they threatened ...

09.03.2016 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 22:17, Anna Gerasimova:

Good afternoon)
I do not know about you, but I for some reason in conversations on the forum pictures are not scaled to fit the width of the left block and go right under the unit with the news. Somehow it's ugly. Maybe you can do something?
And after a little nuance that I have a couple of years is alarming.On the main page of the forum, in some windows appear in my opinion failed scrollbars.

09.03.2016 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Heteroptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Heteroptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Euclidia glyphica / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Zygaena / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 22:08, Anna Gerasimova:

Thank you)

09.03.2016 22:07, Anna Gerasimova:

For 2016 and the first, and all still))))
We attended a couple of times in this Lotter, but to no avail.

09.03.2016 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Larva / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Monochamus urussovi / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acericerus heydenii / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

09.03.2016 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acericerus heydenii / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

09.03.2016 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2016 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2016 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2016 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2016 21:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monochamus urussovi / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

09.03.2016 21:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monochamus urussovi / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

09.03.2016 21:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monochamus urussovi / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

09.03.2016 16:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2016 15:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think that should just make a bigger default map scale, output when approaching the photo page.
To display approx. So:

For example, the page took this photo: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42748
In this place, already points to merge into one at a scale that is now.Zoom is the most optimal solution to this problem.
And in order to see the other point, which is located near the scale you can reduce your own))

09.03.2016 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Yuri. I certainly do not be angry :), this is the case, when the most low-quality (in this case, good :)) picture of the lower wings help to determine the type. I wish he would not overlook any possibility of a precise definition DV species. :)

09.03.2016 13:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, I completely forgot about these pictures. Some time later, I started at the order imposing and found a folder with an unknown butterfly. Before and kind of got stalled. I got in touch with Alex and sent, adding a picture where the rear wing can be seen. It was only later, already began to remember that like something tossed to the site. So there were duplicates. .Butterfly seem rare, not known to feed Alexis interested than larvae fed. Ira then passed along with the caterpillar feeds, with the definition of a plant problem. Then it is not decided (who knew that it would take). We have now decided by fragments of the plant in the picture. I will show in the institute, they can at least sort of say.So Alexander, you are too much then do not be angry, that just does not add the main photo.

09.03.2016 13:22, Aleks Brown: This species is identified correctly.

09.03.2016 12:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, in the our was not there :) This is the last dozen or so, I go skating with him. Before any major trip is pumped maps and satellite imagery for the entire planned route, cables, ship in a netbook. And then in the car on the site of a navigator with the netbook on your lap and running Ozi-com with a connected GPS.Not only do you see the position of the machine and the surrounding landscape for a dozen or more kilometers for orientation and selection of interesting places, but then you can view the entire route by downloading it to the same Google release space image with all the collection points. Here for example last year Kazakhstan (meky scale). But you can see all the details to increase.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php? fbid = 798299653580892 & set = a.798299636914227.1073741853.100002025950541 & type = 3 & theater

09.03.2016 11:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

I fully agree with Matt. Question Yuri. Why is this image has not been uploaded, along with two other photos. There is clearly visible speciation characters - yellow lower wings. With such a view. Uploaded would not have to correct the error. :)

09.03.2016 10:16, Yuri Semejkin:

In our time there were no GPS. Probably handy, I never used.

09.03.2016 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Did. And remove the only Peter can now extra group)
Certainly the two groups do not need)))

09.03.2016 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41745 group.

09.03.2016 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

09.03.2016 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it's also a question solved. The truth is only me and Peter))

09.03.2016 9:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks Basil. . But I still do not poymu.Zachem need 2 groups of the same species?

09.03.2016 9:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, by the way the season will start soon. Rather it would be interesting "reports" from other regions to check out ....

09.03.2016 9:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, suffered)))
A loaded later photo # 55256 you can connect to a group of their own.
As well as write to the author's comments that defined the mats. These 2 steps are no time constraints.

09.03.2016 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acronicta rumicis / Alexandr Zhakov Acronicta catocaloida / Yuri Semejkin.

09.03.2016 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acronicta rumicis / Alexandr Zhakov Acronicta catocaloida / Yuri Semejkin.

09.03.2016 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rules which stipulated a photo considered double of the site there.
Adopted just write that it take a photo that was uploaded later.
I think this approach is the most logical.Or do you have some other reason to write under the older photos that it should be removed?
It was enough just to write under these photos that he should move. And under loaded later that it should be removed.
Now in this example show that the moderator does in such cases)) If you do not know ......

09.03.2016 9:06, Evgeny Komarov:

We assume that both partly right, not always possible in writing to convey what you want to say. Indeed, for sufficiently homogeneous landscape quite dostotchno point on d. Ivanovka :).I mean, about this, as I have on the river Ilovlya: most extensive forest-meadow floodplain with ponds and steep right bank in output and rugged limestone gorges. On google now it's all perfectly clear on satellite, so there has got two points with a distance between them in kilometers - completely different sets of species.And about the exact binding - I'm in unfamiliar places without GPS I do not go and do not go, and within the scope of point shooting location on Google release satellite images will show up to 5-10 m long journeys (Asia, Altai, Primorye, etc. .) Any point of collection-shooting is always tied to GPS, and then transferred to the high-resolution satellite imagery tied prog OziExplorer / Hence, this approach to my own point of shooting, charges :) It is clear that so bother unit.

09.03.2016 8:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene! Yes, I do not insist. Just here we are talking about clarity. Let's pokritikuem. Here are your words Vasilyev said: Because your Torbeevsky forest localize possible! And that will go through the village Torbeevo look: Do not go around the village to look for when shooting in a place specified neighborhood of the village such. This is the first.
2).Somehow I do not understand the expression itself try to put points on the site, and not by Geography. binding. What is it like ? What kind of place is it? About Forest? Only about what and where he is. . So you in any way specify the geographic location of the shooting. And approximately + - dozens? hundreds of meters?. After all, your token is not binding tool, all of the hand to the eye.In modern cameras like is the ability to precisely specify the location shooting, but. Not all these cameras there, and insects is not static, but dynamic. . And in the high precision requirements when there is no object moving. Here arises al. Question. And whether the markers are needed everywhere.Yes, in the conditions of the tundra, steppes, deserts, in a flat wooded area they are some Old. And in the mountain? Or mountainous? When fully digital high-rise marks vertices title, rivers, streams., Inflows and no camera, which gives the coordinates of shooting enthusiasts shoot truth too rare.It is enough to indicate the place of shooting, and anyone who wants a place (not up to a meter, which is not required) and find out of it in the villages, if they are close, will not climb.

09.03.2016 7:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, this is exactly the bust will, a kind of fence :) He does presence or absence on the site images immature stages does not help to establish a "terrain" type. TB that absolute majority simply is not on the site (it is not Lepidoptera, and snmkov in lepidopteran eggs, larvae, pupae ....I'm not talking about the fact that such information is given in the description of the species. And on the species distribution by regions, ie separately "for Moscow" ... At least (well for me and maximum) to be able to open the page view the map with points of his instructions on the website.

09.03.2016 3:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Regarding tochek.A not convenient to be next. We want something to look at where and how widespread mass? Well: Gaining genus, species, and then specify the desired area. For example the neighborhood of Moscow. We click OK. And in front of us a map with all having on it at this time point. Few of Moscow, the Moscow region, let's see.Few ? Let's add the region (s). I would like to see more. - What else is possible? And show us what something like a physical map of the world Somehow. And note that in this case the markers are the same color, for example to adult. Good. Where species are found we looked.
And now I would like to learn, and Flying-pass whether we view the local ali.We do all the same, but instead of writing the imago egg or a larva or pupa. We click OK. And in front of us all the local species.
Total: 1) .For adults markers of the same color (show the distribution). 2) For laying, larvae, pupae, etc. marker. Color. Here we see that kind of uniquely sedentary. Tk. laying -kukolki can not fly.

09.03.2016 2:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Sir! Let me disagree with you. At first I did not 1 or even 5 shots to remember the existence of duplicates vsё.Poetomu was found after the download.Second: I do not know all the nuances of the site, in particular, what is considered the double? It would be good to get acquainted with these little things, throw pliz a reference where these little things (rules) set out on this site.

09.03.2016 2:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Ivan! Let me explain his amateur point of view on it. Do not be bothered. If you have the opportunity to reinforce its surveillance analysis of the genitals of the drug, this one. And if not, then leave this matter experts. .... There are others. Approach sometimes works ...Previously, the "old" entomologists say, you can not visually see the difference species then see biology.

09.03.2016 1:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just :)
"Everyday zhuchista"

Meshchora: Vladimir region, env. der. older Omutischi

09.03.2016 1:10, Peter Khramov:

Dim Sum, Thanks for definition, and now maybe more species will be illustrated.

09.03.2016 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, if it were I set for each type of specific point - the card has already been-would be whole in them. So much so that the card can not see, would be under them)))
I specify settlements closer to that insect * (as on the label) have been found.
If you put the point even every two hundred meters-will fear (((
Of course for very significant findings make an exception.Just like here: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43606
Even comments yesterday wrote about this)))
A so-called "Torbeevsky Forest" -nazvan so at the nearest town to my village.
In fact it is:
http: // wikimapia.org/17799006/ru/Малаховское-участковое-лесничество-Виноградовского-лесничества-ГКУ-МО-«Мособллес»
An array of large and contiguous with him 4 districts of the Moscow region: Balashikha, Lyubertsy, Ramenskoye, Resurrection + GO Domodedovo.
And who is looking for, he finds.The main area which contains look :)
And if you are interested in precisely the snag under which was found a bug - please in PM :)
Even the tour will spend probably)))

08.03.2016 22:31, Evgeny Komarov:

And, Basil, I still try to point to put in place, not tied to a geographical locality, if he caught-shot. The area is important, certainly, but also the habitat landscape no less. After your Torbeevsky forest localize possible! And that will go through the village Torbeevo look :)

08.03.2016 22:26, Evgeny Komarov:

On horseradish has something to gain? You open a photo and must see the point! More "nekuzyavo". Although, of course we want everything at once :)

08.03.2016 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Torbeevo typing in the search. Point it at me while one of the surrounding and I Torbeevsky forest all the animals to dump.
And, of course nekuzyavo (((This village is located geographically in a different area of ​​the field .....

08.03.2016 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.03.2016 21:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Here is an example: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55174! And where there is a search for photos? Which of the points of the heap?

08.03.2016 21:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, Basil and the rights that it is desirable, when you look at the photo on the card once it was immediately clear what the point refers to it from the map shown in the photo page. Indeed, not clicking the same for each point (and there will be many regions a lot).

08.03.2016 21:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, and in the future will be such that you open the page, and type on the map (it is on the type of page is not) displays all the point where it is marked on our website? It seems to me, is the most important result and the most interesting result of users and experts.The second point: the size of the map on the page picture is very small, when you skid point, which by Google / by Yandex is not (of a set), so uncomfortable enough to look many times in parallel by opening the same Google Earth with the "Maps of the world" plus something then, and then moving map on the form page. Can not it somehow expand?

08.03.2016 21:13, Ivan Pristrem:

A nizya make the same photo can be labeled with two or more kinds, with doubles to not bother?

08.03.2016 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my opinion it is necessary even in the center of the map to place a cross to coincide with the point where the insect. "Target", not to be confused :)
And then, the card will soon feel dazzled points ....

08.03.2016 20:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, please daring melancholy "Seminsky pass" (both) - I missed a spot there. While edit / delete we still can not.

08.03.2016 19:18, Ivan Tislenko:

Unfortunately this head, probably not from this bug http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/45283. They are removed in the same place with a difference of 1 day. So, the probability that they are different kinds - small. I stand in the bedbug Lygaeus simulans.
In principle, if a photo of the insect is equally suitable for two types, then do not worry, if it is to illustrate any of these species.

08.03.2016 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why load double (though a certain other person)?
It was enough to write under these photos override and it would be rescheduled.
Moreover, the double is considered to be a photo that is uploaded later.
Accordingly: this photo has a double room 55254 :)

08.03.2016 17:59, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion it is the larvae, not the adult. The wings have not yet formed.

08.03.2016 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My opinion.
It should be tied to a specific point in a photo each instance. Restrictions should not be here and the photo quality is not important.
Only here the group, which shows a photo of one individual should attach one photo.

08.03.2016 17:46, Ivan Pristrem:

By the way, among my Lygaeus equestris, it seems, one simulans delineated ... This is very interesting ...

08.03.2016 17:40, Yuri Semejkin:

A question. And whether or not the author of the pictures, if more than one-fitted to the point of all your images.? Grassroots kind they do not show, but in order to show the presence of at kind enough and multiple files (preferably from egg to adult) same thing, and the rest of the nation does. Attach it considers necessary to confirm the point type. ...Or it is necessary to strengthen the shots, including and bad?

08.03.2016 17:23, Ivan Pristrem:

Lygaeus simulans. This thing, from which tendrils grow, convex and bent at an acute angle (sorry for the pun, I still do not know how this part of the head is called). A 55253 - the same instance or the other?

08.03.2016 16:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Delete. Because Matt is double of http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55254 redefined

08.03.2016 16:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Delete. Tk is the double http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/55255 and Matt redefined in Acronicta catocaloida

08.03.2016 15:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Catonephele orites.

08.03.2016 15:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Catonephele numilia / Male.

08.03.2016 15:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Catonephele numilia / Male.

08.03.2016 15:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Catonephele numilia / Male.

08.03.2016 15:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Catonephele numilia / Male.

08.03.2016 15:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Cithaerias pireta.

08.03.2016 15:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Catasticta flisa.

08.03.2016 15:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Panacea procilla.

08.03.2016 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Arhopala.

08.03.2016 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Zygaenidae.

08.03.2016 15:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Arctiidae.

08.03.2016 15:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Nygmiini.

08.03.2016 15:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.03.2016 15:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Lymantria.

08.03.2016 15:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Lomographa.

08.03.2016 15:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Lycaenidae.

08.03.2016 15:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Trigonodes hyppasia.

08.03.2016 13:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Padenia.

08.03.2016 13:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Padenia.

08.03.2016 13:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Adites.

08.03.2016 13:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Adites.

08.03.2016 13:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Adites.

08.03.2016 13:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Hippotion.

08.03.2016 13:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Cyana.

08.03.2016 13:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Cyana.

08.03.2016 13:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Hippotion.

08.03.2016 13:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Hippotion.

08.03.2016 13:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Hippotion.

08.03.2016 13:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Ambulyx.

08.03.2016 13:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ambulyx belli

08.03.2016 13:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ambulyx belli???

08.03.2016 13:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hippotion boerhaviae / rosetta, genital differences

08.03.2016 13:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hippotion boerhaviae / rosetta, genital differences

08.03.2016 13:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Cyrestis acilia / Male.

08.03.2016 12:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.03.2016 12:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.03.2016 12:00, Fedor Ovechkin:

Male

08.03.2016 11:59, Fedor Ovechkin:

Male

08.03.2016 2:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That same would suggest)) This is the best option)

08.03.2016 2:35, Peter Khramov:

In general, yes. Although it public, but is it no one else clave, why the author does not have full rights to edit it? ..

08.03.2016 2:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Let's start from the social point of another. While at one point the author, it can be moved if necessary. (Or may move for example for an hour). And from the moment of accession by another author, -one becomes movable.

08.03.2016 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gerridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.03.2016 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gerridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.03.2016 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gerridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.03.2016 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gerridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.03.2016 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gerridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.03.2016 0:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gerridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.03.2016 22:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Papilio thoas.

07.03.2016 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it's probably necessary to see)
And this kind of apparently ordinary and ubiquitous because, as a series of I is the same from different places.

07.03.2016 22:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

then spotted all this kind?

07.03.2016 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Inet helped: http://www.nbair.res.in/insectpests/index.php
Specifically for this type: http://www.nbair.res.in/insectpests/Cryptalaus-sordidus.php

07.03.2016 21:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Adhemarius ypsilon.

07.03.2016 21:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And how this determined?

07.03.2016 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Simply need a photo to a new point to move than the old point completely, with all its contents to drag to a new location. Especially if you point it to the public and anyone stranger has pinned photos of the author okromya point.Here is "a very interesting question," then he will disappear-a :)
"It is an interesting question: what one rights should be in terms of editing General points With its clear, there is the author terms the king and god, but in general is sort of like no Because people were tying it to such a point?. and the author, for example, took it and even moved."

In short:
If a personal point - the right to have a drag.
And if the public - no such rights.
Everything is easy)))

07.03.2016 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Go on - it will be interesting. Only now determine their problem (
Yeah, there are healthy in tropical.
Now this ticker estimated and left 3.5 cm (length indicated))))
To beetles is a large beetle.

07.03.2016 19:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is necessary to lay out his beetles. It seems like there is))) Large

07.03.2016 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elateridae Cryptalaus sordidus.

07.03.2016 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elateridae Cryptalaus sordidus.

07.03.2016 19:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nothing did not realize in cabbage rolls)))

07.03.2016 19:13, Peter Khramov:

Well, people missed, I placed wrong. Then he picked up, moved. Normal matter, why not?

07.03.2016 18:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In general, today the generic name Sevenia. Previously, it was Sallya.

07.03.2016 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And why is the very point of drag? Create a new one and all.
The truth is not worth point of the city "at every bush in the territory of the court"))
But the ability to "flip" their own photos from one point to another does not prevent

07.03.2016 17:44, Peter Khramov:

Lord about the language. Now until the dough, work is normal only in the Russian version of the site. In the future it will be possible for English to ask the English versions of names and descriptions of points (optional). Accordingly, do them now is not universal. Call on the Russian, then, if there is a desire, and an English version of the pile.

07.03.2016 17:39, Peter Khramov:

Synonyms?

07.03.2016 17:27, Peter Khramov:

For inaccurate enough data?

07.03.2016 17:26, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, you have done everything correctly. At the point that you have set up, there is a combination of two properties: 1. What did she put Tobo (your) 2. What is the total in terms of rights attaching thereto photos. Those. it is both "brown" and "violet". For you important is that it's yours, so you will see it "brown."But other users will see it, "violet", because for them it is important that it can be fixed foty, although it does not belong to the marker.
The cross - a standard sign of closing the window. Accordingly, at the touch of a marker installation will close the window (and canceled, this is the default).Drag the marker can be, but now this feature is covered. I will tell you later, together with the editing points.

Speaking of editing. Very interesting question: which one should be right in terms of the edit points in common? With its clear, there is the author terms the king and god, but in general already like as not.After all, people were tying it to a point, and the author, for example, took it and even moved.

07.03.2016 16:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Asia is different)))

07.03.2016 16:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Sallya madagascariensis.

07.03.2016 16:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Taenaris.

07.03.2016 16:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Nyctemera coleta.

07.03.2016 16:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Cyana.

07.03.2016 16:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Cyana.

07.03.2016 16:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Creatonotos gangis.

07.03.2016 16:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Creatonotos gangis.

07.03.2016 16:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Curetis thetis.

07.03.2016 16:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Curetis thetis.

07.03.2016 16:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Junonia villida.

07.03.2016 16:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Hypolimnas bolina / Female.

07.03.2016 16:10, Yuri Semejkin:

http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/52908 I tried. He created a common marker, and remained brown (your point). What did not?. And yet here the name of the cross painted above. On it is necessary to click? The first time I clicked and I became a token from purple to green. Then even I tried, but it's just a window was closed.
And further.: Is it possible to set a marker to drag to a new location, so it was a little more precisely?

07.03.2016 16:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Imago Catopsilia pomona / Female.

07.03.2016 16:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Junonia lemonias.

07.03.2016 16:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Hypolimnas bolina / Female.

07.03.2016 15:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sevenia madagascariensis, why that view is not in the database (and the family too)

07.03.2016 15:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zizeeria knysna???

07.03.2016 15:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leptotes pirithous???

07.03.2016 15:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zizeeria knysna???

07.03.2016 15:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male Zizeeria knysna ????

07.03.2016 15:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Very similar to Leptotes pirithous

07.03.2016 15:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

To me, a banal female Zizeeria knysna

07.03.2016 15:41, Peter Khramov:

Beautiful girl!

07.03.2016 15:40, Peter Khramov:

With dogs, dogs with them!

07.03.2016 15:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Precis andremiaja.

07.03.2016 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Saribia.

07.03.2016 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae Coeliades ramanatek.

07.03.2016 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae Coeliades ramanatek.

07.03.2016 15:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Saribia.

07.03.2016 14:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, I realized that she was part of it) of the number of copies of the collection)

07.03.2016 14:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieridae Colotis amata.

07.03.2016 14:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Byblia anvatara.

07.03.2016 14:43, Peter Khramov:

So life is good in Asia, go out on the street, you will look at the village - the terms of any bright butterflies. And we sit here ... drink ... (c)

07.03.2016 14:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Junonia oenone epiclelia.

07.03.2016 14:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

One of the most often catch the eye of butterflies in Asia.

07.03.2016 14:38, Irina Nikulina:

Many warm thanks !!! All - with the advent of the long-awaited spring and approaching the new season) Spring mood updates and joy !!!

07.03.2016 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Again, yesterday evening was a glitch, and general could bear both uncommon. For Dosanga corrected. If some other need to be corrected in one direction or in the opposite direction - say. Editing will open later.

07.03.2016 14:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Precis andremiaja.

07.03.2016 14:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago Junonia goudotii / Male.

07.03.2016 14:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.03.2016 14:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Papilio polymnestor.

07.03.2016 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So like a common set) It is necessary to quickly change the attributes of a general / personal edition and describe the points to enter.
P.S. Here is the default time of the creation of the point:

Check box in most cases I do not rearrange.

07.03.2016 13:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Well then, is the general and personal points: Point "Dosang" Basil personal, nobody sootvetstvetstvenno her nothing of his not tie A photo of the village of Dosang many different authors.Get if you do is one common point, it is necessary to mold at least 5-10 pieces on Dosang? This is to ensure that if we put an end to the popular site, it is better to make it general. The idea arose when he wanted to snap a photo of the light Dosanga.

07.03.2016 11:53, Peter Khramov:

It was hard to do, mainly because I could not do it myself. A hired people who were taken for it, never brought the matter not so much to the end, but at least to some initial, but a fully working version. And now, at last, I was a man who did (Alexander, thank you again!)
ZYSurely it was possible to solve the problem in the past, just her money Bay (offer ten times more money, wishing probably would have found), but ten times more money is not: -))

07.03.2016 10:10, Evgeny Komarov:

Congratulations to all of our beautiful women on the occasion of Spring! Happiness, health, interesting trips, and discoveries of new beautiful pictures!

07.03.2016 9:52, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus, female

07.03.2016 9:49, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus, female

07.03.2016 8:07, Shamil Murtazin:

I like this butterfly. Some unusual combination of colors applied for our latitude)

07.03.2016 7:58, Shamil Murtazin:

In general, as long as it works. I do not quite understand why it was difficult to do so, but a man who is still done - thank you very much for the solution of "long-playing" issues. =)

07.03.2016 0:14, Peter Khramov:

Not been tied.

07.03.2016 0:14, Peter Khramov:

To treat small bug, when the total card points, affixed you could appear in the same color as the point of other users.
Seen a bug due to which during the evening could not correctly affixed properties Total points / non-generic. Now I corrected.If someone urgently need to change this setting in their markers - email me, I will change a screwdriver. If there is no urgency - like ottestim this option, lay out the interface for self-editing data points, and then be able to change everything by yourself.

06.03.2016 23:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Oh ... how so)

06.03.2016 23:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

06.03.2016 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Yes, in the nearest plans of creating a detailed section on the site / Help / FAQ Scroll to the / instructions, etc. But after a point, the exchanger and, most of all, improvements to the text editors and curators of information. Those. somewhere at the end of the month.

06.03.2016 23:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Incidentally, I once again rekvestiruyu creating FAQ. Soon already own begin to forget that and how it works ...

06.03.2016 23:26, Peter Khramov:

Exactly. On the map, it is very clear.
Circles clusters vary in color and size depending on the number of points included therein. However, the first two - only in color. Changes in the amount of start from the third (from hundreds starting points, if I remember correctly).
But the general point that to understand? At the point is, the author (who had her put down).If he put a flag that his personal point, then no one else for her to tie their foty and nothing can not only view. If, however, he pointed out that a common point, then to the same point can snap objects and other users. Conveniently, if you were in the same place.
ZYWho bear in geography coordinates with GPS in a fractional form - try to close up for these photons to the point (the floor) machine.

06.03.2016 23:19, Shamil Murtazin:

A great way to see the geography of coverage. Even clearer it becomes to expand much =)
Watching colorful markers added. Only when combined can cost different size range of paint, depending on the number of "eaten" the points, not the color change?
I look forward to how it will develop the theme with his / common points. It is not very clear.
P.S.I add all your main points. This helps the site search of Yandex.

06.03.2016 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Basil, thanks for the feedback.

06.03.2016 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Again ochepyatka ((

06.03.2016 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Arhopala amantes.

06.03.2016 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On the site the correct name, and the author is not present.

06.03.2016 23:00, Shamil Murtazin:

typo in the title of the form?

06.03.2016 22:59, Shamil Murtazin:

species is not found ...

06.03.2016 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All OK )
Tied pair of photons to one of its points and one photo to someone else. Everything is clear and functioning properly)

06.03.2016 19:54, Peter Khramov:

The first stage of the test is normal, therefore, we proceed to the second: working with less reduced functionality.

Now, at one point, you can attach multiple photos


If the photo is removed away from the already affixed points set as before the new point and automatically fastened to her photo.If the photo is at a point that is already installed, then click on this point to the photo page and click the button "Snap a photo to this point." Preview photos immediately appear next to the previously attached.I draw your attention, you can not only tie so your picture, but also to the common points (those points, to which other authors have put a sign of "total").
To make it easier to find their own or general terms, they are now highlighted. Legend cm. On the common cards on the page, and a photo page.Please potestit this functionality in the living examples and speak out, whether all OK.

06.03.2016 16:20, Peter Khramov:

Duc I Gauvreau will. Only after everything will be worked out at the default map guglovoy: -)

06.03.2016 15:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Sympetrum croceolum / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.03.2016 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2016 15:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum croceolum

06.03.2016 15:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

This occurred no later than January 2016.

06.03.2016 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, I do not drive. Just Wikimapia has all the necessary geographical infa. Until the numbers of houses in the settlements, wells, ditches, mountains, streams, and so on. :)
Simply it would be great :)

06.03.2016 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Offtopic deleted. The situation is clarified with the geography of Vasily and Dmitry on the phone. If someone were questions on this theme - please start a new topic in the Community and to voice them (issues) there.

06.03.2016 13:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cyphicerinus tesselatus.

06.03.2016 13:46, Peter Khramov:

The sequence of actions in this area is as follows:
First, the entire working on the clean version of Google (assuming that there will be 2 or 3 stages), because we think the need for additional chips (including layers, etc.) and, if necessary and possible, fasten them.This already established point we is not going away, and operate at all stages.
One more thing. I remind you that we have a map in any form still can not start for several years, although attempts were not one and not two. That's me to the fact that citizens do not drive horses, is not so simple.

06.03.2016 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Personal View worthy (of the same name) points.
Finding this jewel beetles was for me the main opening of the season 2014
Why is that?
This was quite eloquent excerpt from the Red Book of Samara Region: http://rrrcn.ru/kksam-redspecies

How many on the edges I have ekskursiroval either before or after this discovery ..... It still remains single.Apparently these words are true of the CC: ". It is a rare species, population trends unknown type is rare throughout its range"

06.03.2016 12:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Everything is so Basil. . But auto substitution did not work or when manually enter a name or by copying and inserting. As a result, it was necessary to ship without a name, and then write it separately. So Peter, another puzzle. The date put down shooting. The specimen was alone, the pictures sealed.

06.03.2016 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pyralidae Assara korbi.

06.03.2016 11:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It does not have thoughts tie top Google release card information layer with Wikimapia:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Викимапия ???
Link to the very Wikimapia: http://wikimapia.org/
How did the developers of the famous Russian customer "SAS.Planeta": http://sasgis.ru/sasplaneta/
Then the need to write descriptions of the geography in the points will disappear by itself.

06.03.2016 8:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How "not gone"?
Type I created yesterday, but today the picture is loaded.
By simply copying the name, which is written in the Comment of the author and inserted into the appropriate line autosubstitution works as it should.
Wrap yet I will not. Let Peter will understand this "magic" ...
Regarding the individual in the photo. Understand help exif.))
By the time the shooting can establish a correspondence (for some reason I do not see that the time these pictures were specified).

06.03.2016 3:29, Yuri Semejkin:

The database now has such http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/54528, and the picture in determining why something did not go. I do not remember, this is the same individual or different. Why did not strengthen.

06.03.2016 1:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae Cyphicerinus tesselatus.

06.03.2016 0:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Ideopsis Ideopsis similis.

06.03.2016 0:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Ideopsis Ideopsis similis.

06.03.2016 0:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Ideopsis Ideopsis similis.

06.03.2016 0:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Ideopsis / Imago Ideopsis similis / Male.

06.03.2016 0:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Ideopsis / Imago Ideopsis similis / Male.

06.03.2016 0:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I do not doubt it, but I may be wrong in their belief)))

06.03.2016 0:30, Peter Khramov:

You write as if in doubt. When in doubt, I suggest writing the definition of a question mark, not as a statement. Well, inaccurate and probably can, with an explanation about the region ...

06.03.2016 0:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

According to many specialists Palaearctic, as this is not my area, - so it's best to wait opinion spetsa the region or group

06.03.2016 0:26, Peter Khramov:

People almost every day on this article walks (upon request). And the more because of the hill (at En version) ...

06.03.2016 0:25, Peter Khramov:

It must be something necessary, but that's not clear how to catch that moment when it came off ...

06.03.2016 0:23, Peter Khramov:

Dim, you also have rights. Endure at once, if you believe.

06.03.2016 0:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Araschnia levana / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.03.2016 23:14, Peter Khramov:

A couple of comments on the cards:
1. Lord! The fields "Name" and "Description" point - optional. You can both of them simply left blank.
2. The meaning of these fields - especially to you, and in the second - to other users, it was clear what it is. Those. the most striking moment, you remember this place quickly.If you find there a single Apollo in his life - please call "Apollo", if you have a villa there - for God's sake, "Hut", etc. If you are willing to sacrifice a bit of their own interests in favor of the public, then call on geography, for example, "The stream not far from Osinok" etc.
Description - similarly.You can clarify or reveal the features of this place. But still. Call and sign points the way it is you see fit (or do not sign at all), at the moment there are no rules on this subject.
2.1. Call for taxa is necessary only in case if it is the case with both the aforesaid Apollo.The list of types will be displayed in an ordered through binding to the point photo and taxa - automatically.
3. Now you can not edit the properties of the point, but this patch for the test, a little later, you can change the names and descriptions of their points.So do not worry if you fill something wrong or come up with a better name - CHANGE you have it, just not right now. Same thing with the coordinates of the point, and with reference to its facilities.

05.03.2016 23:06, Peter Khramov:

And where does Dushanbe? At the station Lepsy Googol finds a place, and after that see 17 km NW: -)

05.03.2016 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Well there it is written, it is not necessary to remove. One more thing. New phot - a wild blockage in the shade. There is clearly a compromise is needed.

05.03.2016 22:58, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, Google selected as the basis, as is a versatile option globally - both on the habits of users (and multi-language interface), and by detailed maps (the average for the globe). In Yandex full seams in foreign cards.Alexander, I just meant to share points on the relatively accurate (no more than 100 meters radius) and imprecise (radius greater than 100 meters). Digital obsuzhdaemo yes.

05.03.2016 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hoplosternus Hoplosternus incanus.

05.03.2016 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hoplosternus Hoplosternus incanus.

05.03.2016 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, thank you very much for the description. Now I am pretty sure that is what he is here because of this phrase: "pronotum whole or in part, head and shield dark, reddish-brown" that matches my copies. (On molbiole pronotum black).
I stand until inaccurate. Well, then how it goes. Although the options and do not see :))

05.03.2016 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anosimus fasciatus.

05.03.2016 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cyphicerinus tesselatus.

05.03.2016 16:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Anosimus fasciatus (Faust,1887)

05.03.2016 16:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Cyphicerinus tesselatus ( Motschulsky, 1860).

05.03.2016 16:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Colias / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Colias myrmidone / Male / Artem Strizhov.

05.03.2016 16:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Colias / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Colias myrmidone / Male / Artem Strizhov.

05.03.2016 15:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Papilio / Imago Papilio polytes / Female.

05.03.2016 15:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Papilio / Imago Papilio polytes / Female.

05.03.2016 15:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, the female poured

05.03.2016 15:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Colias myrmidone male

05.03.2016 15:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

it should be removed

05.03.2016 13:06, Alexander Belousov:

For high altitude of 500 meters radius - it could be two or even three-different biotope. And this means that animals can be quite different. 100 m +/- think most times.

05.03.2016 13:00, Alexander Belousov:

And how can we bind to the map? And Dushanbe - this is too much.

05.03.2016 11:26, Shamil Murtazin:

And you can even OSM to be? Well, or Yandex. And it does not find it on the map. Google is not a local, not a detailed map, and via satellite even that task.

05.03.2016 10:58, Peter Khramov:

Yet, apparently, it will need to add a sign of precision. For example, the radius of 100 meters or more. Because people do not always remember exactly where, for example, I took off, but it can point to an accuracy of plus / minus 500 meters.

05.03.2016 10:55, Peter Khramov:

It is only necessary to give authors the ability to edit the description of the point and change the conditions of access to it (personal or general).
Yes, it is a matter of the full version of the interface after potestit everything. And it is possible to make pictures tied automatically, "the place of the shooting / fishing" for information in the graph?
The full version will be field when you upload a photo, which you can enter the coordinates for the auto binding, the ability to bind foty to the existing point is not in the map interface, but also on the number of (useful if you need to bind a lot ph) plus try to seal the automatic extraction of information about the coordinates of the EXIF.

05.03.2016 10:01, Ivan Pristrem:

Wow Well! And you can make photos tied automatically, according to the information in the "shoot the place / fishing"?

05.03.2016 8:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is good and right)))
Working.
I put down somewhere without thinking:
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/54475
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43546
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/52957
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/52811
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/52814
You just need to provide the authors with the ability to edit the description of the point and change the conditions of access to it (private or shared).

05.03.2016 8:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

05.03.2016 8:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.03.2016 8:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

05.03.2016 8:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Forficulidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Labia minor / Evgeny Komarov.

05.03.2016 8:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Forficulidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Labia minor / Evgeny Komarov.

05.03.2016 8:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Forficulidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Labia minor / Evgeny Komarov.

05.03.2016 8:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Forficulidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Labia minor / Evgeny Komarov.

05.03.2016 8:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Ivan Pristrem Lachnaeus crinitus / Evgeny Komarov.

05.03.2016 4:16, Peter Khramov:

References:
Card Forum - http://insecta.pro/ru/maps
Example foty tied with a point - http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/14592.

05.03.2016 4:14, Peter Khramov:

The site runs a mechanism by which the maps on Google Maps, you can put points (markers) and bind to them arbitrary text, photos, and other types of taxa, etc.
Because thing for the non-standard site, you first will be trimmed dough on functionality, and then run the full.In the "Maps" main menu now you can only watch already dotted. When you click on a point - its name and description (if any left the author) and a preview of the photograph with a link to which is attached a point. In addition to the actual points on the map you can see the so-called Clusters - visual association blizkostoyaschih points (markers).When clicking on a cluster, you can see a list of its constituent pixels and the zoom in button to see all cluster points. Available conventional functional Google Maps - map / satellite, object names, search for the name of the object, etc.
Tying the point now we can only photographs. Add to this are the author's photo.To put a new point and attach to it Fautua - go to the pictures page, look below the map, click on the right place at the right mouse button, fill in the fields (if you have something to fill), and confirm the installation. In addition to the name and description of the point (optional) to choose, the point is your personal or shared.If total, the pictures will knit and other objects and other users (not just you) to this point in the future. Especially popular, if you were not the only ones hunting or if the place is so popular that it is not necessary to enclose a bunch of points there.
Let potestit this matter and will express his impressions.

Warning!


1.Now you can not only bind to one point one photo, but several different photos. Therefore. One point set, Fautua tied. If in the same place photographed still images 100,500, do not need to fence the same number of points on each other , bind more photos to the same point.In addition, tie foty possible not only to their points, but also points to other users that are marked as "shared".
2. Now the only point put by clicking on the map.If you have photos of the exact coordinates (eg, GPS), for these photons do not need to put a point on the map is now , later they can be much faster and more accurately bind through numeric values. What, then, is necessary? A select a number of his photographs, for which no precise GPS-data and deliver them to a point on the map to each point of tying one or several photons.
UP 6 March 2016: The test must now bind multiple photos to a single point.

05.03.2016 3:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, too, doubt, yesterday found in the internet picture (also 1). And that Eugene is silent? Plastinchatousye like his band. You can throw Lobanov, who can sign. And here the description of the skins.

04.03.2016 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Nothing decided not to. Stas does not appear.

04.03.2016 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Strabena / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 23:10, Peter Khramov:

The fact that the description of the photo from the author there is no column "type of geography, all the cases." Therefore Shamil can not just pull out skopirnut Old. Apparently, it is a safety net for collecting data from different fields to describe all that can be attributed to geography, it fills in the space provided on our website.I remind you that the author of these pictures ph himself on the site does not load, and we will ship with his permission, preliminary shaking from his website.

04.03.2016 23:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

then simply Strabena sp

04.03.2016 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Probably, this is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranomafana_National_Park, there phot, taken on the same day there. But it's not 100%, kanesh.

04.03.2016 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Heteropsis / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 23:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In neighboring Ecuador and written. I brought a photo whiteflies uncertain - Madagascar written anywhere was not. How to put the satyrs, as seen / Madagascar. Nafig write the Indian Ocean islands, if you can write MADAGASCAR

04.03.2016 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Heteropsis / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Heteropsis / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Heteropsis / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Heteropsis / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 23:01, Peter Khramov:

Written Berenty, and in neighboring ph where you leave comments, is written even Madagascar.

04.03.2016 22:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes

04.03.2016 22:54, Peter Khramov:

All the same Madagascar.

04.03.2016 22:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where Madagascar written ???

04.03.2016 22:54, Peter Khramov:

And that jerk, Madagascar, it is Berenty, yes. What's the Trouble?

04.03.2016 22:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Araschnia levana

04.03.2016 22:53, Peter Khramov:

In terms of where exactly in Madagascar?

04.03.2016 22:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heteropsis

04.03.2016 22:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heteropsis

04.03.2016 22:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heteropsis

04.03.2016 22:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heteropsis

04.03.2016 22:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heteropsis

04.03.2016 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Riodinidae / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 22:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Strabena sp. We need accurate label.

04.03.2016 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

this is not a satyr - riodenida.

04.03.2016 22:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The author can pull of geography?

04.03.2016 22:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Colotis zoe / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Even in this photo size 233h221 (not really see) (
And so, it seems she is: http://www.biodiversityexplorer.org/butterflies/pieridae/colotis_amata.htm
Wrap?

04.03.2016 22:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Colotis zoe

04.03.2016 22:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If Madagascar - the only one option, - Colotis amata

04.03.2016 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Charaxes bernardus / Imago / Anna Gerasimova Charaxes kahruba / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 22:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I, too, is only found. But you never know what kind of Berent still have)))

04.03.2016 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A guess.
If in the Indian Ocean - Madagascar, national park " Berenty Reserve": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berenty_Reserve
Generally absolutely nails this geography ......... "Funny pictures", a pancake (

04.03.2016 22:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and with it that we decided ???

04.03.2016 22:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female Charaxes kahruba

04.03.2016 21:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.03.2016 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Catopsilia pomona / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Catopsilia pomona / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.03.2016 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Catopsilia pomona / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Catopsilia pomona / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cepora judith / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae Cepora judith.

04.03.2016 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Appias albina darada / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Appias albina darada / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.03.2016 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Larger lay out - is understandable)

04.03.2016 21:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What country?

04.03.2016 21:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The country is what?

04.03.2016 21:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Appias albina darada (Felder & Felder, [1865]) female

04.03.2016 21:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cepora iudith (Fabricius, 1787)

04.03.2016 21:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cepora iudith (Fabricius, 1787)

04.03.2016 21:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona f

04.03.2016 21:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona f

04.03.2016 21:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona f

04.03.2016 21:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona f

04.03.2016 21:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Do not, Basil - not he))) does not look like me on yours.

04.03.2016 21:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, everything flew. More precisely, this is not all - just a trifle. In general, I do not collect beetles)))

04.03.2016 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Forficulidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.03.2016 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Forficulidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.03.2016 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Forficulidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.03.2016 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Forficulidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.03.2016 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Forficulidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.03.2016 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Forficulidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.03.2016 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Forficulidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.03.2016 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The two photons flied definition and for some reason they were in the admin panel.
Fixed, but we need to understand why it happened six months after the first transfer.

04.03.2016 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Hylemya / Fedor Ovechkin.

04.03.2016 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Hylemya / Fedor Ovechkin.

04.03.2016 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Yuri. I am honestly confused korichnevyё color pronotum and legs.
The source of confusion here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=154452&view=findpost&p=588119 (many images in the network is not found). Or simply a variation? If originally did not miss, of course ....

04.03.2016 17:15, Yuri Semejkin:

In the former USSR by the nature Hoplosternus listed only one species, namely Hoplosternus incanus Motschulsky, 1853 to insects of the Far East of the USSR. Volume 3, Part 1, page 421.

04.03.2016 17:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In addition to the previous post timid suggestion Hoplosternus incanus ??

04.03.2016 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

None reasons there is no concerning the type?
Interesting as the same species composition of this kind or similar to it in those places where the copies.
The network information is close to zero (it can and it seemed but a hand sink) (((

04.03.2016 16:19, Ivan Pristrem:

It's all in the light caught ?!

04.03.2016 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, by the way)
One Khrushchev this mattress I have already identified. The largest beetle on a mattress (top, left).
It: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/54454 (my truth from the peninsula, but the view and Borneo in full growth is present)
So that as much as possible out with beetles. Not everything is lost ))

04.03.2016 4:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Assara korbi (Caradja, 1910) In the not accurate. And to make necessary preparations genitals. I looked at on a picture Kirpichnikova VA Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS.

03.03.2016 23:02, Ivan Pristrem:

Interesting!

03.03.2016 19:44, Peter Khramov:

Well. Even remember nothing ...

03.03.2016 19:44, Peter Khramov:

That's one way to put it...

03.03.2016 17:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And what to tell?

03.03.2016 17:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Small it sits on the nail of your finger.

03.03.2016 16:44, Peter Khramov:

The name probably contains the word gigantella.

03.03.2016 16:22, Peter Khramov:

Ooh! Pozdravlyaems return! You tell me how gone? At the same time is another reason to close up the blog section of a human. And we're finally launching the card, Mona will also illustrate the way to achieve your hiking ...

03.03.2016 14:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm at home

03.03.2016 14:27, Peter Khramov:

ABOUT! You already vozvernulsya or write from a burning tank?

03.03.2016 13:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think Eugene Komarov lay all)))

03.03.2016 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zhukov, in many cases you can not straighten))
There are no obligatory criteria raspravki like butterflies.
So, out with it)))

03.03.2016 13:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zhukov I do not straighten))) so that the picture will not do bugs. How to begin to spread scales - will spread. This year, for the most atlases flying (although torn in the trash already)

03.03.2016 13:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Agapanthia pilicornis / Irina Nikulina.

03.03.2016 13:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree )

03.03.2016 11:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Heliconius erato / Alex Dumchus.

03.03.2016 11:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Adeloneivaia / Alex Dumchus.

03.03.2016 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Caligo / Alex Dumchus.

03.03.2016 11:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Papilio thoas / Alex Dumchus.

03.03.2016 8:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Adelpha / Alex Dumchus.

03.03.2016 8:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Adelpha / Alex Dumchus.

03.03.2016 8:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Hamadryas laodamia saurites / Alex Dumchus.

03.03.2016 8:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Anartia jatrophae / Alex Dumchus.

03.03.2016 8:22, Alex Dumchus:

Anartia jatrophae

03.03.2016 8:17, Alex Dumchus:

Adelpha

03.03.2016 8:15, Alex Dumchus:

Adelpha

03.03.2016 8:11, Alex Dumchus:

heliconius erato

03.03.2016 8:09, Alex Dumchus:

Hamadryas laodamia? male

03.03.2016 8:06, Alex Dumchus:

Adeloneivaia

03.03.2016 8:04, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo, on the underside like Caligo teucer

03.03.2016 7:58, Alex Dumchus:

papilio thoas

03.03.2016 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Ok, then now you can simply mark the comments to remove (and ship a new version) - but only for svezhevylozhennyh ph, and if there will be many cases, it will make the timing right.

02.03.2016 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Acmaeops smaragdulus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.03.2016 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Acmaeops smaragdulus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.03.2016 14:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vladimir Bobow Carabus vietinghoffii vietinghoffii / Evgeny Komarov.

02.03.2016 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Callidium violaceum / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.03.2016 0:50, Shamil Murtazin:

I have only his own ... the author does not include replacement.

01.03.2016 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Well tady replacement, yes. Do you have the right?

01.03.2016 22:16, Shamil Murtazin:

in fact the same photo. just focus on the butterfly, and not on the grid.

01.03.2016 22:03, Peter Khramov:

Uuuh as well with new types something went!

01.03.2016 22:00, Peter Khramov:

If it is a double, then you can change. If Fota yet another, just download another, and then remove any excess.

01.03.2016 21:59, Peter Khramov:

Share anything not necessary. If you really want to attach to different species, that do double and throws it to the second view.

01.03.2016 21:58, Shamil Murtazin:

there will be)

01.03.2016 21:56, Ivan Pristrem:

Types gathered under a tree, described or not? If disclosed, but on the other tree, then again, 50% are new, it is really very interesting to direct.

01.03.2016 21:53, Ivan Pristrem:

Incidentally, I tried so one photo split into two, but in the end one of the staff was otmetёn and butterflies pictured left twin.

01.03.2016 21:51, Ivan Pristrem:

Perhaps one of the photo to make two or three separate? But then so is any will not work on both types of spray, it is necessary for any one to reckon, because this option is not available.

01.03.2016 21:49, Ivan Pristrem:

This picture may change to a better option that I have found, or it will remain forever?

01.03.2016 21:38, Evgeny Komarov:

The comments "right, middle, left," I do not see other options.

01.03.2016 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put to clarify it in the race (so sure).
With the kind of representatives thereof, have difficulty (
Look how well it subgenera: http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/Glenea-Newman-1842-(genus)
Anyway according to unconfirmed reports (rumors) in this genus as much as more than 1,200 kinds ....
In short - the plague (
But perhaps we shall be stronger :)

01.03.2016 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lamiinae / Evgeny Komarov Glenea / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.03.2016 21:12, Shamil Murtazin:

here's what to do with these photos ... such interesting and kind of definition is complicated)

01.03.2016 20:12, Peter Khramov:

In the Amazon jungle ... It is time in the jungle!

01.03.2016 19:33, Evgeny Komarov:

The Amazon jungle is such a method: Take a hefty tree under which spread out "sheets", and then fumigated wood insecticide or some crap. All of the tree pours down and going. Result: 50% of the species of order (two or three hundred collected) unknown (not described). Something like that!

01.03.2016 19:07, Ivan Pristrem:

I heard that in the Amazon jungle is not yet known to science to meet the kind of easier than have someone described, because the latter though there are so many, but still several times lower than that is not described.

01.03.2016 18:48, Evgeny Komarov:

If only Rutelinae. C Chlaenius-th (Carabidae) could not cope, not anywhere "climbs". Damned tropics :)))

01.03.2016 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not only in Borneo))
Rutelinae - all crazy group all over the world))
One problem: I can not for them to find an adequate system anywhere.
And the definition of the pictures, unfortunately the problem ((

01.03.2016 18:21, Peter Khramov:

On Borneo, there is generally ...

01.03.2016 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lamiinae / Imago / Evgeny Komarov Palimna annulata / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.03.2016 18:05, Ivan Pristrem:

Thank you!

01.03.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Glenea grossepunctata ? It is necessary to ascertain whether there is, in the view of Borneo.
And probably more by habit:
https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/bycidDB/wdetails.asp?id=38983&w=o

01.03.2016 17:58, Ivan Pristrem:

Size - about 6 - 7 mm, do not remember exactly, but something like this.

01.03.2016 17:49, Ivan Pristrem:

About plants - I know, I remember about what it looks like, but do not know exactly how the name of this plant species. This year I will move to a new survey format, one or more photos of the insect close-ups from different angles + photo plants with him to see, on the site, these photos will be collected in the same group.I already have these developments, for example - Photo 53650 and 53651.

01.03.2016 17:37, Ivan Pristrem:

The picture looks nice, but in real life - even 200% cooler.

01.03.2016 15:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Ivan Pristrem Tychius quinquepunctatus / Evgeny Komarov.

01.03.2016 15:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Loxostege sticticalis / Evgeny Komarov.

01.03.2016 15:17, Irina Nikulina:

According to their liking) I agree with Eugene. This figure frequently in the Far East - sticticalis, is already one of the 37 regions, and in the monograph by VA Kirpichnikova brother- twin p. 501

01.03.2016 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

I also consulted. :) Other systems treat differently, but probably it is necessary to agree with Matt and Kononenko and combine these two kinds. To avoid duplicates, I unite and brush my doubles.

01.03.2016 14:51, Evgeny Komarov:

And what you here meadow moth (Loxostege sticticalis) do not like? Just figure considerably reduced?

01.03.2016 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.03.2016 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Male.

01.03.2016 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Male.

01.03.2016 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.03.2016 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Prismognathus subaeneus / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.03.2016 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Prismognathus subaeneus / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.03.2016 13:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Good. We are waiting for the decision of Alexander.

01.03.2016 13:10, Peter Khramov:

Make it so that there was no double - dealing of the first importance, so I brought yesterday kinds. Clarify that used as the main title, and that as a generic combination - business, on the one hand, less urgent, on the other - requires more knowledge. Consequently, the decision rests with the curator of the taxon.

01.03.2016 12:40, Yuri Semejkin:

REDD ago. Consult the mat, -Here's his answer

There was a brief period when the race was renamed Meganola Rhynchopalpus, but now he returned to the old name, for example, in the book Kononenko Noctuidae Sibiricae 2. System Directory Russia butterflies managed to severely outdated for 8 years

01.03.2016 12:04, Peter Khramov:

Basil, Mr. Shaw are you surezno Sedna?))

01.03.2016 11:48, Yuri Semejkin:

I forgot to put a question mark. The definition in question

01.03.2016 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

01.03.2016 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.03.2016 10:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.03.2016 8:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Assara korbi

01.03.2016 8:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if bugs are beetles (refer to the Neg. Coleoptera) ..... then I was Fidel Castro :)

01.03.2016 6:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Pseudocatharylla simplex ( Zeller, 1877) ?

01.03.2016 2:56, Peter Khramov:

By the way, those who are there on the site is not particularly regularly, but is it a significant number of comments and / or photos, I highly recommend this section (My News) to quickly navigate especially in the comments of those that concern you.

01.03.2016 2:34, Peter Khramov:

Brought to the same species.

01.03.2016 2:25, Irina Nikulina:

In Sinev Rhynchopalpus fumosa Overlooking gigas already understood, apparently, there are more doubles (

01.03.2016 1:24, Peter Khramov:

Beetle beetle, has a bug!

01.03.2016 1:04, Peter Khramov:

Wudi of the frame!

01.03.2016 1:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is a bug, not a bug)
Added 3 species is.

01.03.2016 1:02, Peter Khramov:

Lord, but please check the other beetles have been laid out Zoran, if such a thing. Suddenly, even where errors. There they (the beetles) is a little ...

01.03.2016 0:56, Peter Khramov:

One kind would make at least good to kind of do not hit the "empty" taxa (which is always a temptation to poudalyat).
ZY A beetle crediting kanesh. Mordastenky.

01.03.2016 0:52, Peter Khramov:

In some users could experience the following bug: instead of issuing adequate (comments to the topics taxa, images, to which you subscribe (ie their author or a comment on them before)) in the "My Subscriptions" was granted a total feed for comments.Gluck treat, if before you had one, now you can safely use subscription - all displayed correctly.
P.S. Lord! Do not hesitate to report if you see something on the site is not working properly, so I can fix it.

01.03.2016 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So far, only the genus made to deliver. On the species composition will be decided in it later.

01.03.2016 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomoidea Calidea.

29.02.2016 22:38, Peter Khramov:

By the way, yes. Perhaps, in such cases it is necessary to reduce Fautua ... What do you think, John?

29.02.2016 22:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Callidea sp.: Scutelleridae

29.02.2016 21:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Not barbel! But what it can not understand even the family :(

29.02.2016 21:49, Evgeny Komarov:

A bit like a Orthogonius suturalis Chaudoir, 1871 http://carabidae.org/carabidae/Orthogonius%20suturalis%206986.jpg, but there is something close.

29.02.2016 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is enough to look at a common habit and shape of pronotum to understand that this is not Obrium sp.
And no it's not at all barbel IMHO.
While in the Coleoptera he belongs.

29.02.2016 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Obrium brunneum / Zoran Bozovic Coleoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.02.2016 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morimus asper Morimus asper funereus.

29.02.2016 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.02.2016 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.02.2016 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.02.2016 19:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan, here with similar views (Tychius elephants and many others) is very desirable to indicate which plant is removed (or at least have a picture of the plant. Define is a lot easier if you know on what is found.

29.02.2016 19:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, this is where I kind of defined http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/53608, but on the page of the original photo remains definition, although it also illustrates the normal view of the faithful.

29.02.2016 19:16, Ivan Pristrem:

Yes. I too have overturned beetles. As long as they have me stand on the meaning of "underside".

29.02.2016 19:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, you can find something in the garbage and the more Cleonina. Kazakhstan and later in Asia, the main area. I found a couple of times in the Volga for a long time. Oh, I do not understand, I was already determined to five hours? It fell off, or what? Now again!

29.02.2016 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.02.2016 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.02.2016 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.02.2016 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.02.2016 17:50, Ivan Pristrem:

Rare? I do it just by the house found on a vacant lot near the w / e web, and more never seen.

29.02.2016 17:48, Ivan Pristrem:

it was very difficult with this photo. That photo shot with a flash, and that - no, a color rendition at the camera, which foty these have been removed, in general any strange. When natural light normally takes places, sometimes - not. On this particular photograph color butterflies generally had some pink and purple.I tried to bring the color closer to the picture with the flash, but still not quite succeeded. And this is not an isolated case.

29.02.2016 17:42, Ivan Pristrem:

With this particular photo that something terrible had happened, because its data is any there in October 2014, but I do remember that this beetle was shooting in the summer at the cottage. Most likely, this is the beginning of 2013. Although not exactly vouch.

29.02.2016 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Dicerca furcata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.02.2016 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.02.2016 15:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Meganola fumosa (Butler, 1879)

29.02.2016 14:36, Evgeny Komarov:

To me, everything is normal with the contrast. Rather, clarity / sharpness a little to add.

29.02.2016 14:34, Peter Khramov:

Ivan, a month or even a year, too, no?

29.02.2016 14:33, Evgeny Komarov:

It, and, most likely, acuta. But divination - in Ecuador for at least another 4 species that apparently I do not know.

29.02.2016 14:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Adeloneivaia / Alex Dumchus.

29.02.2016 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Ivan, the contrast too little? ..

29.02.2016 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Ivan note this phot turned noticeably less contrast than the next, although the shooting conditions, appears to have been similar. Those. just nedoredaktirovanny picture. Write it was true or not ...

29.02.2016 13:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Definitely!

29.02.2016 13:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Excellent find!

29.02.2016 13:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pycnodactylus / Ivan Pristrem Temnorhinus hololeucus / Evgeny Komarov.

29.02.2016 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.02.2016 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.02.2016 10:47, Peter Khramov:

By the way, yes, it would be necessary to make the same setting jacks, as well as for landscape ...

29.02.2016 7:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculioninae / Ivan Pristrem Maximus strabus / Evgeny Komarov.

29.02.2016 7:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculioninae / Ivan Pristrem Maximus strabus / Evgeny Komarov.

29.02.2016 7:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculioninae / Ivan Pristrem Maximus strabus / Evgeny Komarov.

29.02.2016 1:51, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cithaerias / Imago / Alex Dumchus Cithaerias pireta aurorina / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

29.02.2016 0:36, Peter Khramov:

Evaluation lot polovatelya another.

29.02.2016 0:32, Ivan Ivanov:

Yeah.

28.02.2016 22:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, let them be a subspecies - since such a system. This issue has already been discussed. Let our babochniki expressed.

28.02.2016 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Prepona / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Dokinul all comments that have been in the English version, but were not in Russian.

28.02.2016 20:08, Peter Khramov:

This species has subspecies in today. Tellingly, in Piret. If there are objections one - voiced. [108659] Cithaerias pireta aurorina (Weymer, 1910) [Sub]

28.02.2016 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Basil, Shamil currently not vozmozhnot do everything at once. When A is - only in English. A commentary is necessary to translate at least as previously. Although in the case of names, kanesh, this will be done faster. But as long as the same ought to pause at least a little after booting, Shamil large volumes of cargo.

28.02.2016 19:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Brassolini / Shirley Sekarajasingham Eryphanis automedon / Evgeny Komarov.

28.02.2016 18:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Dear, you're just too quickly define, I do not have time to fill in all the blanks. That's just completed the =)

28.02.2016 18:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter nor I have a butterfly nor Alexander are not authorized to add here. Add views. This is a good source http://butterfliesofamerica.com/

28.02.2016 18:31, Alex Dumchus:

aurorina.Samets course. Both types have a collection. This is me in a hurry is not the kind of clicked.

28.02.2016 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The reason for the change is determined to be in the English version: http://insecta.pro/gallery/53228
There's a comment of the author is given the colloquial name of the species: Malachite
Lord spread, please immediately download the geography and comments in both versions. Regardless of the language data.
Jumping on the versions to find out the truth I do not reason (

28.02.2016 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Shirley Sekarajasingham.

28.02.2016 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Shirley Sekarajasingham.

28.02.2016 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Opsiphanes / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Brassolini / Alex Dumchus Catoblepia soranus / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

28.02.2016 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Catoblepia soranus / Shirley Sekarajasingham Brassolini / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Citheronia / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Citheronia / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Caligo / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Brassolini / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Prepona / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Caligo / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Automeris / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heliconius / Shirley Sekarajasingham Heliconius sara / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Adelpha / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Citheronia hamifera / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Siproeta stelenes / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Siproeta stelenes / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 17:39, Alex Dumchus:

Opsiphanes sp

28.02.2016 17:37, Alex Dumchus:

Siproeta stelenes

28.02.2016 17:36, Alex Dumchus:

Brassolini

28.02.2016 17:33, Alex Dumchus:

Siproeta stelenes

28.02.2016 17:33, Alex Dumchus:

Prepona sp

28.02.2016 17:32, Alex Dumchus:

Citheronia hamifera

28.02.2016 17:30, Alex Dumchus:

Citheronia

28.02.2016 17:30, Alex Dumchus:

Citheronia

28.02.2016 17:29, Alex Dumchus:

Adeloneivaia ?

28.02.2016 17:26, Alex Dumchus:

Authomeris, maybe A.liberia

28.02.2016 17:24, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo sp

28.02.2016 17:18, Alex Dumchus:

Brassolini

28.02.2016 17:15, Alex Dumchus:

Prepona sp

28.02.2016 17:11, Alex Dumchus:

Adelpha sp

28.02.2016 17:03, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there is a glitch climbed again recently nailed it again.

28.02.2016 17:01, Peter Khramov:

How to download - said, then I will go further and by the comments on geography.

28.02.2016 17:01, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, talk with Alexander, and then endure, which decide ...

28.02.2016 17:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cithaerias pireta Cithaerias.

28.02.2016 16:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catonephele numilia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 16:59, Alex Dumchus:

Heliconius sara

28.02.2016 16:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Disagree: Cithaerias aurorina aurorina (Weymer, 1910)

28.02.2016 16:59, Peter Khramov:

At the same time on a tip Yuri Semeykina pochikal bug where foty could not be loaded if the name of the author of the taxon present apostrophe.

28.02.2016 16:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Не согласен: Cithaerias aurorina aurorina (Weymer, 1910)

28.02.2016 16:57, Alex Dumchus:

Catonephele numilia

28.02.2016 16:56, Peter Khramov:

All there is fixed, simply refresh the page ...

28.02.2016 16:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cithaerias pireta / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2016 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Everywhere where the species has not yet been illustrated got some butterfly. I have the same (

28.02.2016 16:52, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo sp

28.02.2016 16:48, Alex Dumchus:

Cithaerias pireta

28.02.2016 16:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Not sure . That this beetle Pseudozaena tricostata currently in my last update looks butterfly with Eugene apparently seeing the same thing.

28.02.2016 16:44, Alex Dumchus:

Authomeris sp

28.02.2016 16:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Do not fix it, see here http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1037043 - the same butterfly photo shows the "photos of other species"

28.02.2016 16:38, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

28.02.2016 16:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, look here http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1037043. and, at the moment, right on the front page! A certain butterfly with a fright illustrates the newly added species of ground beetles me!

28.02.2016 16:03, Shamil Murtazin:

I'm tired now :) :) I will ship more

28.02.2016 16:02, Shamil Murtazin:

By thumbnail - I do not see any changes. http://insecta.pro/ru/catalog - all the same pictures ...
The same is true when you view the form - all kinds of thumbnails in the same taxon - one and the same picture.

28.02.2016 15:09, Peter Khramov:

In rare cases new registration could not take place, thus display a message that a user already exists, although in fact it is not on the site. If you are in this situation - register now try again, this time for sure everything will turn out: -)

28.02.2016 14:01, Peter Khramov:

I looked suffered commentary hands. Like them there nothing at all (you're in the English-their version uploaded?)

28.02.2016 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Well, the boom on the commentary track. Geography in English is transferred to the Russian version.

28.02.2016 13:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Only two large folders ... but ... It would throw the whole geography and comments. I started to, but I realized that it is not able to manage. And better still pictures to load.
There are some species that are either erroneously written, whether in our database they do not - they are not tied in short. According to the commentary only be tracked.

28.02.2016 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Ooh, Shamil, well, you looked up today! How many photos uploaded soon!

28.02.2016 13:02, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, if downloading is now the problem continues, send me a mail photo you loads, I'll check on it specifically (other foty loaded norms).

28.02.2016 12:57, Peter Khramov:

With thumbnail corrected. With loading'll check.

28.02.2016 12:42, Shamil Murtazin:

In the "Catalogue" thumbnail image types are all the same ...

28.02.2016 11:04, Yuri Semejkin:

I tried to load after load of Vladimir, but nothing has changed.

28.02.2016 8:48, Yuri Semejkin:

When you upload your file pops inscription successfully uploaded to the gallery site. You can always edit the data files you have uploaded to your personal account (section Downloaded images).
But no image in the gallery or in the A / R So there was already 1 time (long ago)

27.02.2016 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Polistes / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2016 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Polistes / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2016 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Vladimir Bobow Polistes / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2016 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Lepturinae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2016 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Monochamus urussovi / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2016 15:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Monochamus urussovi / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2016 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Monochamus urussovi / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2016 14:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Peltis grossa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2016 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing wrong. Dog and dog mortal corpse can be found everywhere, not just in my town.
And representatives of this species fell on or near the easiest to detect.
There beetles prey on the so-called "Maggots" (screwworm), which eat.
Predators, but Vaughn "teeth" have)))

27.02.2016 13:17, Peter Khramov:

How terrible you the city! You go, then, that's so, you walk with a baby, and all of a sudden! Decaying corpse of a dog! But Creophilus maxillosus present.

27.02.2016 13:12, Peter Khramov:

Zhdems!

27.02.2016 13:12, Peter Khramov:

Removed double. Editing a need in the task list it is, but this list is great ...: -) Now meanwhile exchanger plus cards in the operation. Plus sometimes some thread small things.

27.02.2016 10:41, Evgeny Komarov:

And I already have pieces for fresh charges this year, there are (from Dima satellite) :))). Interesting little things are present there! Straightening, photos will be.

27.02.2016 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, here http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/821630 infa duplicated in column "Properties appearance and differs from similar types of" Get a double, please.
Generally speaking, the time for you to attend to the topic of enabling people to edit the Old about the kinds. At first, though, would be the opportunity Modera oh how not hurt.

25.02.2016 23:45, Peter Khramov:

The Ok, if any glitches notice strange boot - said, will monitor and edit.

25.02.2016 22:55, Shamil Murtazin:

I can not say now ... Maybe just waited a little when drove name, and can hit the letter of the Cyrillic alphabet ... But I could only insert genus)

25.02.2016 19:02, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, and why here Cobalus sp. It was? Do not Attach or even some kind of mistake?

25.02.2016 19:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cobalus Cobalus virbius.

25.02.2016 13:05, Peter Khramov:

Whew. It seems that the same will be with the last card prostanovkoy points in the near future. If I am not mistaken, this approach №7: -)

25.02.2016 12:25, Peter Khramov:

Basil, thanks for the note corrected.

25.02.2016 11:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Euptychoides nossis / Evgeny Komarov.

25.02.2016 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And yet this Trouble with the same example, but I think that it is present everywhere: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/991738
When formalizing tag "hibernating stage" infa in the English version, in the section "Over-wintering stage" is displayed in Russian. It also should not be.

24.02.2016 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mace and black pattern is similar. Most likely it is.
Also I thought to it, but did not dare because he did not know whether he was there-there :)

24.02.2016 22:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nicrophorus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Nicrophorus vespillo / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 21:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nicrophorus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Nicrophorus vespillo / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 21:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Inaccurate because there is no confidence in the absence of pubescence on the leading edge of the pronotum. Angle hides.

24.02.2016 21:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nicrophorus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Nicrophorus vespilloides / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, John Silver from "Treasure Island")))

24.02.2016 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Regularity there always is. If there are specific instances of someone - just send links and descriptions, will be calculated.

24.02.2016 21:22, Peter Khramov:

Well so I'm talking about something and say that in fact still needed 3 options: top, side (for the body), he's underside (for wings) and bottom (for the body).
Correctly?

24.02.2016 21:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Well then, mind you at once, that in England. version of "throws" in many cases, not only in the case described by Vasily. Sometimes even the law is not clear.

24.02.2016 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Rhopalus maculatus.

24.02.2016 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Underside has a bottom: this is essentially the same. Only written differently. Plant a separate checkbox is not necessary.
But some crows to the sides and underside is done :)

24.02.2016 20:19, Peter Khramov:

But quick is not done. We'll have to do is not in a hurry.

24.02.2016 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Taki start a new value "Angle" option - "bottom"?

24.02.2016 20:16, Peter Khramov:

KrosavEts!

24.02.2016 18:12, Evgeny Komarov:

This lamp DRV 250 watts. And so flies in Primorye in the surroundings. n. Andreevka.

24.02.2016 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do you think about me.
It is much easier in two groups one to connect at once, than to dismantle one, and then from it foty cling alone ....
In short do, but as a people will get confused this is a look :)

24.02.2016 16:15, Peter Khramov:

Make is not difficult, but the people will be confused, mistakenly combining completely different group (this was in the beginning, and therefore limited).

24.02.2016 16:13, Peter Khramov:

Wow, how much. This is a mercury lamp as well fly, or simply a place-goal?

24.02.2016 16:12, Peter Khramov:

, It is necessary to agree.

24.02.2016 15:56, Zoran Bozovic: This species is identified correctly.

24.02.2016 12:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Calycopis cerata / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 11:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.02.2016 11:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Actinote / Shirley Sekarajasingham Altinote / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 11:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Altinote ozomene gabrielae / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 11:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Altinote ozomene gabrielae / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 11:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Altinote ozomene gabrielae / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 10:39, Evgeny Komarov:

As an option can still be Perisama canoma. Without in any way underside.

24.02.2016 10:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

24.02.2016 10:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Perisama bomplandii bomplandii / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 10:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Similarly :)

24.02.2016 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pyrrhocoris sibiricus.

24.02.2016 10:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Pyrrhocoris sibiricus Kuschakewitsch, 1866 Determine Kanyukova EV Zoological Museum FENU (Vladivostok). Add the base type.

24.02.2016 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/991738 when linking to related species, which is available through the "dog" in the column
"Properties appearance and differs from similar types of" throws in the English version. We must deal with this.

24.02.2016 9:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Marpesia / Alex Dumchus Hypanartia dione disjuncta / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 9:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Hypanartia lethe / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 9:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Hypanartia lethe / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 9:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Hypanartia lethe / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 9:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Hypanartia lethe / Evgeny Komarov.

24.02.2016 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Nicrophorus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.02.2016 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Episcapha morawitzi / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.02.2016 15:26, Alex Dumchus:

Fountainea?

23.02.2016 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

This, as I understand it, the top :))

23.02.2016 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Marpesia / Alex Dumchus.

23.02.2016 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vanessa / Shirley Sekarajasingham Vanessa braziliensis / Alex Dumchus.

23.02.2016 15:11, Alex Dumchus:

Vanessa braziliensis

23.02.2016 15:10, Alex Dumchus:

Marpesia sp

23.02.2016 14:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! Most definitely will not be used. It seems like a few are engaged in cultivation, where there is a variation in time of various stages, and such a situation can be created respectively. In fact, the admin and modernizing have to decide how often and like to solve it is necessary or not.If not difficult, you can try and do so not to distract on trifles.

23.02.2016 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Has already :)

23.02.2016 13:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ochyromera suturalis.

23.02.2016 13:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Ochyromera suturalis Kojima & Morimoto, 1996

23.02.2016 13:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Uchtu Basil! In general, all on a holiday !!!

23.02.2016 13:28, Peter Khramov:

If you want, you can seal the function of combining groups. Only to be used frequently?

23.02.2016 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, two finished in the same group can not be connected.
We had a second group dismount and attach a photo of it alone in this group. This extra work for the moderator.
Please take this into account in the subsequent establishment of groups.
Or yourself alone to attach a photo to an existing group.

23.02.2016 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #52907 group.

23.02.2016 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #52906 group.

23.02.2016 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #52905 group.

23.02.2016 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.02.2016 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.02.2016 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.02.2016 12:08, Yuri Semejkin:

This group must be connected to this http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/52905-52907. This is one individual.

23.02.2016 12:07, Peter Khramov:

Swallowtail, Swallowtail there!

23.02.2016 12:07, Peter Khramov:

There, there. How to travel from return - will beg opulikovat)!

23.02.2016 10:45, Alexander Belousov:

Interestingly!

23.02.2016 8:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Certainly worth to spread. Barbel there?

23.02.2016 8:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

23.02.2016 1:58, Peter Khramov:

And that is not defined, then? Why not diptery?

23.02.2016 1:57, Peter Khramov:

Dima, where foty? Where foty, Dima?

22.02.2016 23:58, Shamil Murtazin:

22.02.2016 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Wow! Celebration continues!

22.02.2016 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

22.02.2016 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

22.02.2016 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

22.02.2016 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

22.02.2016 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

22.02.2016 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.02.2016 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.02.2016 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heteroptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.02.2016 17:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Goliathini / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov Taurrhina stanleyi / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.02.2016 17:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Probably, yes.

22.02.2016 17:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It Taurhina sp. Taurrhina stanleyi?
Eternal trouble with self-made names IMHO)

22.02.2016 15:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Melanchra persicariae / Ivan Tislenko.

22.02.2016 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cossus cossus / Ivan Tislenko.

22.02.2016 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ennomos autumnaria / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

22.02.2016 15:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ennomos autumnaria / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

22.02.2016 12:07, Peter Khramov:

Do not ticker. It should be just text. And for the future, and can make the appropriate setting. Although this is more characteristic instance, than the photo. But still.

22.02.2016 11:50, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, none of the above did not bother me, autumnaria quite changeable, strokes, which you write (if I understood correctly), uncommon (http://britishlepidoptera.weebly.com/232-ennomos-autumnaria-large-thorn.html http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/e/ennomos_autumnaria.html), c), including in your butterflies and the surrounding regions (for example, look at Al. Kuzmina https://fotki.yandex.ru / next / users / bianor / album / 158262 / view / 475691? page = 0) The pose is also fairly typical, with a curled mustache back, not once met such in nature, and in the internet. Here look, for example http://www.faunarb.info/animals/semeystvo-pyadenicy-geometridae. Do you have more infidelis, but it looks different.

22.02.2016 10:23, Zoran Bozovic:

Phycitodes binaevella

22.02.2016 9:26, Evgeny Komarov:

I make a long text. I wanted to close the ticker post - uncomfortable darkness!

22.02.2016 6:29, Alexander Belousov:

Another would be the length of the orientation. Beautiful animals!

22.02.2016 1:57, Yuri Semejkin:

I thought on it is likely the way it is, but confuses the following: 1). It views only 1 sling (possibly due to the fact that the fly); 2). In postdiskalnoy part of the wing, on the top, on the underside that there are 3 broad vertical strokes. Not a single picture of the site that is not (in the internet like this occurs, but there Inet Inet.); 3) Do not fit in position location. In all the pictures that site that an Internet butterflies sit either horizontally or upside his head. . Depicted here is always butterfly sits head down. Yes, and look at it like a few others. It is particularly noticeable posture http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/52757

21.02.2016 23:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Got to his exhibition boxes, it was too lazy to open, but overcame himself.

21.02.2016 21:25, Irina Nikulina:

Polistessp. Perhaps,Polistes riparius

21.02.2016 21:24, Irina Nikulina:

Polistessp. Probably,Polistes chinensis(bright fringes on the edges of the pronotum is connected with bordering her front)

21.02.2016 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, thank you! Excellent foty!

21.02.2016 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Apoderus rubidus / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2016 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Macroleptura thoracica / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.02.2016 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Macroleptura thoracica / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.02.2016 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, but also virtually certain habit. About the size of a safety net said. Stand))

21.02.2016 19:54, Irina Nikulina:

I think maleEnnomos autumnaria

21.02.2016 19:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Phymatapoderus flavimanus / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2016 19:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Phymatapoderus flavimanus / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2016 19:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, there is simply no other options.

21.02.2016 19:34, Irina Nikulina:

Agapanthia pilicornis?

21.02.2016 19:14, Irina Nikulina:

Phymatapoderus flavimanus

21.02.2016 19:13, Irina Nikulina:

Apoderus rubidus

21.02.2016 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Callidium violaceum / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.02.2016 17:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae Carabus billbergi.

21.02.2016 17:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vladimir Bobow Carabus billbergi / Evgeny Komarov.

21.02.2016 17:10, Peter Khramov:

Fixed can be edited.

21.02.2016 17:09, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

21.02.2016 15:37, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, I see the problem (Basil had already written about this before), working on a solution right now. How to fix it - accomplish your goal.

21.02.2016 15:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Carabus (Eucarabus) billbergi billbergi Mannerheim, 1827 For some reason it does not work autoselection! I can not move to the form!

21.02.2016 15:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Carabus (Eucarabus) billbergi billbergi Mannerheim, 1827 For some reason it does not work autoselection! I can not move to the form!

21.02.2016 15:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Evgeny Komarov.

21.02.2016 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Callidium violaceumfemale

21.02.2016 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Macroleptura thoracicamale?
Vladimir, what is the size of a beetle?

21.02.2016 14:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I do not find work. No autosubstitution.
THOSE. neither tolerate nor put to the taxon at startup, I can not. Understand, please.

21.02.2016 12:09, Peter Khramov:

Denis, where w is written - the second (optional) for the English version of the site. Those. Translation can be done by yourself.
Return - people sometimes thinks back headstock together with delivery. Here explicitly stipulates that the money for postage will not be returned.But this is a free field, and the seller itself may formulate rules return as it sees fit.

21.02.2016 12:03, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, all the rules, all the goods will soon be seen.

21.02.2016 11:21, Ivan Tislenko:

Melanchra persicariae http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/7549 ?

21.02.2016 11:15, Ivan Tislenko:

Carpenter fragrant Cossus cossus http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/2898?

21.02.2016 11:11, Ivan Tislenko:

Cerura vinula or Cerura erminea?
I read in the determinant that their difference is "reach" (Cerura erminea) whether the "lateral angles spinal rhombic spots base of abdominal legs" or not (Cerura vinula).
Spot this photograph on the second false foot does not hint whether it is Cerura erminea?

21.02.2016 9:03, Shamil Murtazin:

I can see in the right menu "Fresh in the community" post: 0:07, D. Potanin: Return - is usually paid by the buyer ...
A "Community" it is not. Apparently, something happened

21.02.2016 0:07, Denis Potanin:

Return - usually the buyer pays shipping costs feedback, on both sides it is intended will cover the delivery by the seller and to himself, and himself to the seller?

21.02.2016 0:05, Denis Potanin:

Why 2 fields for comment?

20.02.2016 18:39, Peter Khramov:

Test commentary and score lots.

20.02.2016 18:37, Peter Khramov:

I think it's still not there, and bite and sting if her little hands grabbing a whiff poisonous if its stuff in a closed jar, and then open the jar and also as sledyvaet out a breath.

19.02.2016 10:45, Peter Khramov:

Changed.

19.02.2016 10:43, Peter Khramov:

Well, Ok, Ok, you've got the specimen, so everything is possible!

19.02.2016 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For this group has already spoken quite competent special: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/korotya.htm
Therefore, the hope is very vague, alas (

18.02.2016 23:00, Peter Khramov:

More literate people - the more chance)!

18.02.2016 20:13, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?md=read;id=140889
This is just one example. At least halve of uncertain species are correctly identified.

18.02.2016 20:11, Zoran Bozovic: This species is identified correctly.

18.02.2016 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Here is an users's comment.

17.02.2016 20:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Heliconius erato / Alex Dumchus.

17.02.2016 16:15, Alexander Belousov:

All clear, Peter, thank you. I can komenty clean.

17.02.2016 11:47, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is true, the text will change.

17.02.2016 11:23, Peter Khramov:

Why loads more:
1. downloadable photos is often the problem is not that they are loaded in a fine quality, and then on the site uzhali, and the quality was worse. And that originally downloaded the Fautua small but still with a lot of background that can be safely cut with both TZ aesthetics, and with TZ illustrate the type / other taxon.Therefore, the stock may improve the situation.
2. The restriction on the maximum size is gradually changing (increasing). In the case where the source has a larger size can be centralized without impacting authors images foty increase all at once.The problem with not very high quality compression on the site, I think poreshat (and again come in handy if a larger source). After all, no matter what size you are neither Georgia to 320 it will still huddle in ...
Replacement of old phot in LC also check.

17.02.2016 8:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Detritivora / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

16.02.2016 15:59, Alexander Belousov:

In regards to the technical snapshots it said - If it is possible to load Larger - it will be even better. So "no better" if Kartika crop the machine for less. What is the meaning of downloads of "large size"? And so I put the size of a HD monitor, which is even less today.A snapshot function replacement needed! Maybe not all, but I periodically retake copies. again with better coverage (made certain device with a circular lamp). Now the color settings are not jumping.

16.02.2016 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Naturally I do not need to wait (always change immediately).
But little is that people have is: can not ulozhitya at 3 pm ..... So I think it is unnecessary to innovation

16.02.2016 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Basil, why wait three hours to replace the photo that iznrachalno loaded as a double? Why is used once is not changed?

16.02.2016 12:23, Shamil Murtazin:

In connection with the change of algorithm for determining the type of statistics on the main little "wrong."
Those. pictures "look is not defined" 29 pieces, but in fact, there are many photos that are just for butterflies such as assigned.
The reality is not determined to the species level is quite a large number of photos.

16.02.2016 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have already raised the issue, which is directly related to my topic of conversation.
Here: http://insecta.pro/ru/community/53678
Apparently this is due to limitations in the form of innovations in 3 hours on the time change.
Recently I changed immediately after the download - I have everything works .....
Frankly I do not understand why this change is necessary at all.to replace the Rights have not all authors and therefore the probability of bad deeds is practically excluded.

16.02.2016 5:50, Alexander Belousov:

Well, as "not working", replace the window is, # [] - but not actively. And so it "does not work." So that should be good to replace all of my last foty. They were all 1000x1000. Well, if the quality is important. And if not, then do not change.

15.02.2016 19:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Mesosemia / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 19:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

15.02.2016 19:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Detritivora / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 16:43, Peter Khramov:

What does "does not work"? There is no such option in the LC or the option is there, but not plowing?

15.02.2016 13:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Historis acheronta / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 13:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Tigridia acesta / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 13:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Marpesia chiron / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 13:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Helicopis cupido incerta / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 12:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Sarota chrysus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 12:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Sarota chrysus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 12:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Chloreuptychia agatha / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 12:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Chloreuptychia agatha / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 12:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pierella / Shirley Sekarajasingham Pierella hortona / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 7:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Cissia / Evgeny Komarov.

15.02.2016 5:59, Alexander Belousov:

I, too, before he could change, now is not working.

14.02.2016 23:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Probably, too, the male ..

14.02.2016 22:16, Shamil Murtazin:

The maximum size of photos on the site - 1280 by 800. If more - to fit the size of this. Naturally, the shakes are not very high quality (in applicable).
By replacing - it's Peter probably will change. I can only replace your photos, other people - in any way ... :)

14.02.2016 22:12, Shamil Murtazin:

then it is alsoSarota chrysus. Yevgeny Komarov in qualifiers ...

14.02.2016 21:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Sarota chrysus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.02.2016 21:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Sarota chrysus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.02.2016 21:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Sarota chrysus / Evgeny Komarov.

14.02.2016 21:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Diaethria / Shirley Sekarajasingham Diaethria clymena / Evgeny Komarov.

14.02.2016 21:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Diaethria / Shirley Sekarajasingham Diaethria clymena / Evgeny Komarov.

14.02.2016 17:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Caria castalia / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

14.02.2016 13:27, Alexander Belousov:

So there Shamil. Kropnul 800 x 800, it has become normal. I generally set to 1000x1000. I do not become a working replacement photo, before me. It is necessary to replace these image photo # 52563.

14.02.2016 12:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander and the photo when uploaded to the site are placed in the size of 1280 by 800? If not - then they are pressed.

14.02.2016 10:18, Alex Dumchus:

The upper wings are like the female, the bottom as in the male

14.02.2016 10:18, Alex Dumchus:

Aberration on the hind wings absent dop.para holes

14.02.2016 10:17, Alex Dumchus:

What is this aberration female papilio polytes?

14.02.2016 8:10, Alexander Belousov:

Why then, after loading a photo is added to the "weight" and lose their sharpness.

13.02.2016 20:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

13.02.2016 19:12, Zoran Bozovic:

I think, this is Eana incanana. check here:
http://britishlepidoptera.weebly.com/047-eana-incanana-bluebell-shade.html

13.02.2016 17:29, Peter Khramov:

And that can not stand?

13.02.2016 12:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Calospila / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2016 12:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Calospila / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2016 11:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Mesosemia.

13.02.2016 11:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2016 11:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Eurybia cyclopia / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2016 10:06, Evgeny Komarov:

In Byctiscus populi legs and bottom blue body, legs are golden-red. It Byctiscus betulae.

13.02.2016 10:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Andrei Komrakov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2016 9:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Ithomia amarilla / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2016 9:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Ithomia amarilla / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2016 9:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Ithomia amarilla / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.02.2016 9:08, Andrei Komrakov:

Thank you Evgeny! I stand correct..)

12.02.2016 23:51, Shamil Murtazin:

By geography. The most similar - Sacha Lodge (https://www.tripadvisor.ru/Hotel_Review-g789222-d556082-Reviews-Sacha_Lodge-Coca_Azuay_Province.html)
Lodge - Lodges in the jungle. Sacha - some local "alias" =)
Location is almost the same across the river from Yasuni national park.
Dug out a map of Ecuador nat parks (http://www.cuyabenolodge.com/ecuador/maps/snap/map-ecuador-national-parks.jpg)

12.02.2016 21:55, Fedor Ovechkin:

larva

12.02.2016 19:30, Evgeny Komarov:

It does not seem to Oleria antaxis - here are a subspecies of this species from French Guiana: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/Lamas/n_oleria0030.jpg

12.02.2016 14:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hyposcada illinissa ida Oleria assimilis.

12.02.2016 14:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Hyposcada illinissa ida / Evgeny Komarov.

12.02.2016 13:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Ithomia amarilla / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

12.02.2016 12:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chlaeniellus Chlaenius nitidulus.

12.02.2016 0:11, Peter Khramov:

Right now I finish are exchange / venality, then splicing and foty.

11.02.2016 20:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Inaccurate because of habitat there looks similar Zaretis pythagoras Willmott & J. Hall, 2004.

11.02.2016 20:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Zaretis isidora / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

11.02.2016 16:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

11.02.2016 16:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Haetera piera / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.02.2016 19:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Pareuptychia ocirrhoe / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.02.2016 19:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Chloreuptychia tolumnia / Evgeny Komarov.

10.02.2016 19:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Cissia myncea / Evgeny Komarov.

10.02.2016 19:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Cissia / Evgeny Komarov.

10.02.2016 18:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Lasaia agesilas agesilas / Evgeny Komarov.

10.02.2016 18:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Posttaygetis penelea / Evgeny Komarov.

09.02.2016 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved geography with the English version for this and hundreds of other photos - yet without translation.

09.02.2016 20:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Forgotten, that there simply are not supplemented the Russian version. Although, I do not need a translation here. Those who are interested, will understand perfectly. Well then, both for its range is suitable, but my version is closer http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/antirrhea_philaretes_lindigii_live.htm

09.02.2016 20:26, Shamil Murtazin:


09.02.2016 20:01, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, and geography are on the English version - Ecuador, La Selva Lodge (Yasuni National Park). This nat. Yasuni park in the eastern part of Ecuador's border with Peru.

09.02.2016 18:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander, did not see your commentary, though himself a little differently defined. Geography would these photos posted precise quickly.

09.02.2016 13:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

09.02.2016 13:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Posttaygetis penelea / Evgeny Komarov.

09.02.2016 13:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Cissia / Evgeny Komarov.

09.02.2016 11:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Antirrhea philaretes / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

09.02.2016 11:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Junonia genoveva / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

09.02.2016 7:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Metamorpha elissa / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 20:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham Memphis oenomais / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 20:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Metamorpha elissa / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 20:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nessaea Nessaea hewitsonii.

08.02.2016 19:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Nessaea / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 19:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Satyrinae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Nessaea hewitsonii / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 19:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Nessaea hewitsonii / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 19:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Pyrrhogyra crameri / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 19:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Pyrrhogyra crameri / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 18:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Adelpha / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 17:08, Peter Khramov:

Dima Pozhogin now out, by the end of the month will return, promises to help with all Exotics, where you need to confirm. Eugene, if is possible in the definition of inaccurate or kind to send - send.

08.02.2016 16:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chlaenius tibialis / Andrei Komrakov Chlaeniellus / Evgeny Komarov.

08.02.2016 16:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Andrew, Ch. tibialis under the name always has blackened much thigh and lower leg part. On your picture, likely Chlaenius (Chlaeniellus) nitidulus Schrank, 1781. If you specify a shooting position, you can confidently identify.

08.02.2016 16:07, Peter Khramov:

Ok, will do.

08.02.2016 16:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, I need to author, who currently ship. Ivan found a better photo-double, but can not replace in any way.

08.02.2016 14:50, Peter Khramov:

Working. But not everyone is connected. You need?

08.02.2016 9:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, if substitution of the photos work?

08.02.2016 2:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Happened ! Thank you, Peter!

07.02.2016 21:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Adelpha iphiclus (Linnaeus, 1758 ?

07.02.2016 20:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Panacea regina (Bates, 1864) ?

07.02.2016 20:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Panacea regina (Bates, 1864) ?

07.02.2016 18:16, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, in the English and Russian versions of the site a different address, so the Russian site can not "start" in English. Ruska version always begins with insecta.pro/ru, and the English always without / ru. So, what are you talking about, there may be, if you still come on Lepidoptera.ru, rather than Insecta.pro. Then yes. Previously, you would move into the Russian language, and now English.But is not it time in this case to drive itself in bookmarks already insects, not Lepidoptera? ..

07.02.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Prepona praeneste Prepona praeneste buckleyana.

07.02.2016 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Prepona praeneste Prepona praeneste buckleyana.

07.02.2016 17:45, Igor Ivannikov:

Prepona praeneste buckleyana Hewitson , 1876.

07.02.2016 14:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Site page for several hours today opens (start) of the English version, rather than Russian as it was before. Someone's turned out like this for about a week. Now we have to every time you open a site in the upper right corner to switch to Russian.

07.02.2016 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Start from?

07.02.2016 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morpho / Shirley Sekarajasingham Morpho achilles / Alex Dumchus.

07.02.2016 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Adelpha / Alex Dumchus.

07.02.2016 12:53, Alex Dumchus:

Antirrhea philoctetes ?

07.02.2016 12:49, Alex Dumchus:

Adelpha sp

07.02.2016 12:48, Yuri Semejkin:

And why did the start of the English version of the site? Or is it in my buggy? To this day always started Russian version.

07.02.2016 12:45, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho achilles

06.02.2016 18:16, Shamil Murtazin:

I do not know :) I have a tablet, I stuffed on it))) Sometimes I compare with the photos online, but here I am powerless ...

06.02.2016 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

06.02.2016 12:11, Andrei Komrakov:

На мой взгляд, все-таки это самец - более узкие надкрылья, чем у самки (самка на втором снимке)

06.02.2016 11:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Basil! I have myself checked, so to continue to write.

06.02.2016 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

06.02.2016 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

06.02.2016 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

06.02.2016 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

06.02.2016 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

06.02.2016 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

06.02.2016 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

06.02.2016 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, a small remark.
If you mean a subspecies, do not use, please reduction f. in front of his name.
f. means the form, but not a subspecies.
Sub abbreviated as ssp. in front of the name.
Therefore, in the case of a call on the subspecies should be written C. tatarinovii ssp. eversmannii, but not C. tatarinovii f. eversmannii

06.02.2016 9:36, Yuri Semejkin:

With regard to the subspecies C. tatarinovii f. eversmannii. I asked why in a post on 02. 3. 16 I'm asking whether a subspecies of brown roisterer Tatarinov or vnutrovidovaya this variability ?, and then refer to the Amur Zoological Journal. Maybe it is not clear et al., Although no more questions.
Although everything here is simple, visible and understandable. Again in brief.1) in the determinant DV and blue of subspecies is not mentioned, and respectively the question. Next: I Found a infa in the Zoological Journal of the Amur - took a little time to update and so on. Here I'm still not saying anything. And then (above), expressing the view that this subspecies. .It remains to wait for the letter of Alexander and define subspecies, not a subspecies.

06.02.2016 3:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! Let a little bit more about the article (typos, opinions, etc.). To rent an article in a scientific journal, it is not so easy. at least must have permission of the Institute, everything is checked. I do not insist on anything, because not aware of all these nuances. So, what are waiting for your answer by Gordeeva.

05.02.2016 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.02.2016 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.02.2016 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.02.2016 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

05.02.2016 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.02.2016 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.02.2016 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.02.2016 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.02.2016 18:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Meganoton nyctiphanes (Walker, 1856) - in my other options for Taya not. But I put until inaccurate.

05.02.2016 18:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus Meganoton nyctiphanes / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.02.2016 18:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus Meganoton nyctiphanes / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.02.2016 15:07, Ivan Pristrem:

If not a secret, what Saliana longirostris differs from S. antoninus and S. morsa? At first glance, the same ... And the second, too ... And it's not the same kind of accident?

05.02.2016 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.02.2016 14:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

I also give my opinion. Yuri right and wrong at the same time. Rights that should be a scientific edition of fixing the present situation taxon eversmanni. indicating the "stat. nov" or "reinstated ssp.", if it has been previously described as subspecies or species names infra describe the time equal to the current status of the subspecies.Invalid Jury, resulting in job Dubatolova, where he leads the taxon of the rank of subspecies. It is simply a statement of the taxon, with no arguments, or maybe just a typo, or maybe he believes a lot can be. :) All sources to restore subspecies refer to the work of Gordeeva, 2011. and the same operation is referred to as shape.:))) I write Gordeev, so they have clarified the question. :)

05.02.2016 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Identify to species do not even dare ((
A weevil amazing and so the photo must be on the site :)
I want to recommend to read a very interesting essay on a similar beetle: http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/borneoab.htm
Excerpt from the commentary to this publication:
"Weevil, who met Andrei Abramov, belongs to the subfamily Conoderinae (previously - Zygopinae).This is a large group, mostly - tropical species, which includes 18 tribes, and many tens of sorts (in Russian fauna - only fragments of this subfamily - less than 10 species). To determine the instance to within a species, are not doing exactly this group of serious, very difficult. " Korotyaev BA, February 2013
Here you can define the (vague hope)?

05.02.2016 8:58, Shamil Murtazin:

This photo and 52181, 52182 - identical, but species are different.

05.02.2016 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil! There is the difficulty, and therefore the delay. By type of Confucius tuberulatus infa not found. In one of the latest reports on the family of this type is not mentioned in the data base for this group is also http://dmitriev.speciesfile.org/taxahelp.asp?hc=9707&key=Erythroneura&lng=En Here is a description of Confucius. So if you are interested ..
Judging by a picture very similar to Funkikonia tuberculata. The question dealt with, so while we wait.

05.02.2016 2:47, Yuri Semejkin:

It can be a long time and a lot of talk about the kinds, subspecies, forms, refer to the sites even have a lot of publications, but if these publications are not published in scientific zhurnalah- that these are just personal opinion, to the semi-official organ has no relation. INFA Dubatolova in the Amur Zoological Journal, as he is a scientific journal.So, what the conversation, his infa officially recognized.
To refute it Old, need probably others. Infa, also published in a scientific journal. And yet recognize subspecies.

04.02.2016 22:54, Evgeny Komarov:

Irina, subspecies rank as "floating" thing :) Here recently Mikhail Danilevsky (one of the leading specialists on the Cerambycidae family) discussing (arguing) about it.Since he assumed the existence of a mosaic of two different subspecies in the territory of the Volgograd region, where there are instances of the same subspecies, 80 km north of the finds of the second, and 60 km north-west of the first again. Those. about any geographic isolation subspecies of speech does not go .. It's about beetles barbel.I do not accept this, but the proponents of this view also dostatochno.Poetomu should not bother especially. We must lead the subspecies and to give a comment to the different views on it. It seems so to me..

04.02.2016 20:53, Irina Nikulina:

Here at last I found in ist-ke, which I do not know, inf. such - http://sphingidae.myspecies.info/taxonomy/term/75. A Callambulyx tatarinovii versicolor Gehlen, 1941, which is given to all subspecies nizhenazvannyh ist-kah, and on our website, here given as invalid and is a synonym for Callambulyx tatarinovii eversmanni http://sphingidae.myspecies.info/taxonomy/term / 5205.

04.02.2016 20:00, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, thank you. About S. kindermanni like everything is clear - do not have it there. It is now a question of (subspecies) C. tatarinovi eversmannii. The site http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/c_tat.htm S. tatarinovi f. eversmannii (Eversmann, 1854) called the form (in ADULT DESCRIPTION AND VARIATION). In the same in this regard refer to the work Gordeyev (Gordeyev TV, Gordeyev SY 2011. Taxonomic remarks on Callambulyx tatarinovii (BREMER & GREY, 1852 [1853]) from Transbaikalia (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) // Neue entomologische Nachrichten , 67, 79-88.) And VVDubatolova in the article "The new findings night makrocheshuekrylyh (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Macroheterocera) in reserve Dauria" Amur Zoological Journal IV (4), in 2012 he was already named subspecies C. t. eversmanni (Popoff in Eversmann, 1854). But he also refers to the same work Gordeeva ... But if a subspecies, then you need to add to the site. I looked at http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2015/search/all/key/Callambulyx+tatarinovii/match/1, where this subspecies is not, although there is no longer 3 subspecies and 5.In The Global Lepidoptera Names Index, too, did not find, and then http://eol.org/pages/863630/names/related_names. Apparently not made it yet. Therefore, I wrote that the question remained.

04.02.2016 19:32, Alexander Belousov:

Zygaena purpuralis ?

04.02.2016 18:45, Evgeny Komarov:

A small contribution to the discussion of S. kindermanni. Here infa with http://tpittaway.tripod.com/sphinx/s_kin.htm site: Not fully known within the western Palaearctic, but has been found as far west as Istanbul in northern Turkey and Konya in southern Turkey (de Freina, 1979 ; de Freina, 2012), on Cyprus, in the Caucasus, the Republic of Georgia (Didmanidze, Petrov & Zolotuhin, 2013), Armenia (Dubatolov, [1999]), Syria (Talhouk, 1997), Lebanon (Zerny, 1933; Ellison & Wiltshire, 1939; Talhouk, 1997), Jordan (Müller et al, 2005a), Israel (Eisenstein, 1984;. Müller et al, 2005b) and northern Iraq (Wiltshire, 1957).; then east to Mashhad (Kalali, 1976) and south to Shiraz (Iran) (Daniel, 1971; Ghassemi, Alemansoor & Alehossein, 2009). Also, Turkmenistan (Danov & Pereladov, 1985), Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan (Chatkal Mountains), Kazakhstan (Shovkoon, 2015), western Xinjiang Province (China) (Pittaway & Kitching, 2000), Tajikistan (Shchetkin et al., 1988) north-east Afghanistan (Rothschild & Jordan, 1903; Ebert, 1969), eastern Afghanistan south and east of the Hindu Kush (Swinhoe, 1885; Ebert, 1969), northern Pakistan (Chitral) and Kashmir (Bell & Scott, 1937; Rafi et al., 2014). One specimen has been recorded from Kuwait (Kuwait University Collection) (Pittaway, 1993); this is indistinguishable from typical f. orbatus.

Extra-limital range.Western Mongolia (Yakovlev, Ustyuzhanin & Doroshkin, 2005), north, central and southern Xinjiang Province, China (Staudinger, 1901; Chu & Wang, 1980b; Pittaway & Kitching, 2000) and the western Himalaya of India. Reports of this species from the Transbaikal area of ​​Russia (Eversmann, 1854; Derzhavets, 1984) are erroneous and refer to the brown form of Callambulyx tatarinovii (Bremer & Grey, 1853). Those. about any Primorye / Trans-Baikal region and there is no question.

04.02.2016 11:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Er, and what question was, subspecies, not a subspecies? So it does not matter, it's definitely a subspecies. Nobody al. Did not result links. According to your link on molbile, I did not find anything, I'm rarely there and poorly guided .. unnecessarily and there was no one in principle. There has long posed Sergei Rybalkina picture, shot on the lake, I'm on it and guided. https://translate.google.ru / translate hl = ru & sl = en & u = http:? //tpittaway.tripod.com/china/china.htm&prev=search

04.02.2016 10:39, Shamil Murtazin:

And all feed insects in all stages)

03.02.2016 22:34, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, a subspecies ( ssp. ) then I just did not mention it was a brown uniforms C. tatarinovii f. eversmannii, which occurs mainly in the Trans-Baikal and sometimes mistaken for Smerinthus kindermanni . The image of this form of C. tatarinovi f. eversmannii (Eversmann, 1854) (photo by P. Gorbunov) is here http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=185709&view=findpost&p=579945, below explanation P.Morozova. The presence of this form of speech, too, was not in Primorye.Not met even once, and on foreign websites, so that it was mentioned in connection with the Primorye. On what "some websites" you met on the distribution in Primorye? I honestly do not know what it identified as a separate subspecies. But I looked article V. Dubatolova about which you write - there really is we are talking not about the form, but the subspecies Callambulyx tatarinovi eversmanni (Popoff in Eversmann, 1854).So the question remains.

03.02.2016 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Up to 10 February will be around joints like busy at work, after 10 start to work closely with the insects over large, as amended from editing, and so on

03.02.2016 19:06, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Mesapamea_Secalis
ID not possible without dissection!!!!!!!!!!!!

03.02.2016 18:47, Zoran Bozovic:

All of Oligia; ID not possible without dissection!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

03.02.2016 18:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Kohl is mentioned subspecies Callambulyx tatarinovii f. eversmannii, then someone could clarify whether it takes place? or is it just intraspecific variability? The fact that neither the Russian Far East to the insects Volume 5, h. 3, page 507, or in the blue of this subspecies is not.It is only in the number of foreign sites that are distributing this sub-introducing it in the Primorsky Territory. But if you look in the article V. Dubatolova, there is no word on the Primorye Territory. As he points spread Buryatia, west of Trans-Baikal Territory, Mongolia and Northwest China. And yet!

Ps.INFA Dubatolova in the Amur Zoological Journal IV (4), 2012, page 373. PDF there in the internet. It is the only Russian source, al. Did not find.

03.02.2016 18:22, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=140887 Ematheudes punctella
Confirmation!

03.02.2016 18:09, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=140898 Ematheudes punctella
Confirmation!

03.02.2016 15:54, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?md=read;id=140883
Mesapamea sр.

03.02.2016 15:45, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?md=read;id=140884 Noctua comes
Confirmation

03.02.2016 15:40, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is strange that until now no one has laid out. A common sight!

03.02.2016 15:13, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Scotopteryx_Luridata !!!!!!!1

03.02.2016 14:21, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?md=read;id=101655
ID not possible without dissection!!!!!!!!!!!

03.02.2016 14:16, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Mesapamea_Secalis
ID not possible without dissection!!!!!!!!1

03.02.2016 13:56, Zoran Bozovic:

This is not Oligia strigilis. Oligia Sp.

03.02.2016 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

"How lovely". :)

03.02.2016 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Smerinthus kindermannii / Sergei Kotov Sphingidae / Yuri Semejkin.

03.02.2016 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Smerinthus kindermannii / Yuriy Karpov Callambulyx tatarinovi / Yuri Semejkin.

03.02.2016 11:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, here so. Roisterer. In the picture
Callambulyx tatarinovi (Bremer & Grey, 1853) http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/c_tat.htm

03.02.2016 10:25, Irina Nikulina:

Once we are today about this kind I came in, and I'll write about this caterpillar. I read the discussion. Firstly, in Primorye there Smerinthus kindermanni. And in the "Key to the DDA insects, v.5, ch. 3," and Sinev Primorye indicated only Caecus S. and S. rlanus.About finds kindermanni in Primorye had never heard, and reports findings kindermanni Transbaikalia considered erroneous definition, they are referred to the brown uniforms Callambulyx tatarinovii (f eversmannii -. The dominant form of females in the Trans-Baikal region) [134]. Secondly - yes, caterpillars and caecus rlanus develop, mainly on various types of Salicaceae (genus Populus and Salix). But even caterpillars kindermanni same feed - Populus and Salix.Therefore, Sergei conclusion is not clear.
What's here - the discussion.
Revised coastal species of the subfamily Smerinthinae and descriptions of larvae. Perhaps here the last instar caterpillar is one of the species of the genus marumba, perhaps, Marumba sperchius http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/m_car.htm or Marumba gaschkewitschii http://file.mushikurotowa.cooklog.net/momosuzume-green. JPG and http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/m_gas.htm That they have such uzkoovalnye dark spiracles to cut them at the center white line and a long straight horn (12 mm). Neither the color of thoracic legs or head shape is not visible in the photo, unfortunately. Both in Primorye widespread. Forage plants are different, but discuss them, I think, it makes no sense. On this fragment of experts (EBVolynets, BPI DVO RAN) to pinpoint the plant are not taken. In addition, Yuri discussed that a caterpillar could easily be removed and not on the host plants.

03.02.2016 8:12, Alexander Belousov:

Look, this seems not kindermannii.

02.02.2016 19:53, Evgeny Komarov:

OK! Wait!

02.02.2016 19:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ceresa / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

02.02.2016 19:37, Peter Khramov:

According to G. Anufrieva is a member of the genus Ceresa (family Membracidae), imported from North America.

02.02.2016 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Blattodea / Ivan Pristrem Ectobius / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.02.2016 18:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Blattodea / Ivan Pristrem Ectobius / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.02.2016 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eugene Karolinskiy Konstantin A. Efetov.

02.02.2016 13:48, Peter Khramov:

Eugene now swing foty foreign as to be a pause, we will take the Old with karabidov.org (technically this is done, you can be sure). Hands is not necessary to do.

02.02.2016 10:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Hands never reached before imports carabidae.org? I just know if it will work? Or if his hands.

01.02.2016 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, this field work, but only with autosubstitution. Those. enough to drive a name, you must still wait avtopodstanovok and select one. This is done due to the fact that there are taxa with the same name (for example, birth / subgenera).

01.02.2016 7:10, Alexander Belousov:

Peter, now trying to view your photos with the selection. I wanted to just pick whiteflies. When you type in the family taxon line does not show any foty. For other sorts normal parameters (if taxon is blank !!!). What to do?

01.02.2016 4:17, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2016 3:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Rather Aphrophora alni Fall?

01.02.2016 1:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.02.2016 0:59, Eugene Karolinskiy:

31.01.2016 17:17, Salvador Vitanza: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2016 16:32, Igor Sakhno:

On pupae look like

31.01.2016 16:30, Igor Sakhno:

Well ... leafhopper (nymph, probably)

31.01.2016 14:05, Yuri Semejkin:

In general, yes. Question withdrawn.

31.01.2016 13:27, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, as in the gallery you can select for any taxon, and not only on the force. Or you're not on that?

31.01.2016 13:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! And if, in the author's photographs do Hemiptera separation bugs and cicadas? To sample (it will be convenient or not). And when images are not one and not two, and you want to throw for example bug and begin to view their pictures to throw off, and in the eyes dazzled the start guessing SKIDYVAL- not throw off. As a result, formed doubles.Just easier to view your own, to throw shots, thereby -saving time ..

31.01.2016 10:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, I'll try to find out.

31.01.2016 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Heteroptera.

31.01.2016 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves Photo # 42741

31.01.2016 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Funkikonia tuberculata(a synonym for it)?
Yuri, we must clarify.

31.01.2016 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicadetta Cicadetta yezoensis.

31.01.2016 9:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cnemidanomia Cnemidanomia lugubris.

31.01.2016 9:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Batocera victoriana.

31.01.2016 9:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Batocera victoriana.

31.01.2016 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aphrophora Aphrophora costalis,.

31.01.2016 8:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you. Done.

31.01.2016 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera / Confidently identified Urostylis annulicornis / Tentatively identified.

31.01.2016 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

31.01.2016 8:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Urostylis striicornis.

31.01.2016 7:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did.
Just before the first certain kinds of bugs scatter necessary.

31.01.2016 2:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil ! And the cicadas anyone do? And still hanging may have forgotten.

31.01.2016 2:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes typo. The correct name Urostylis striicornis Scott, 1874 Determine Kanyukova EV FEFU Zoological Museum (Vladivostok) .Vid not precisely defined.
It belongs to the superfamily Pentatomoidea Leach, 1815. Family Urostylidae Dallas, 1851 - urostilidy defenders. Subfamily Urostylinae Dallas, 1851. About as stated in the catalog Hemiptera insects Asian part of Russia, page 223

31.01.2016 1:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Usingerida verrucigera.

31.01.2016 1:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, called everything is normal? Or is there a typo? Or synonymous with someone?
I am trying to put a note on the site which is not present. Google your name to the form to make a base. And Google is only a link to this page and nothing else ...... (
You please clarify this issue.

31.01.2016 0:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Epidaus tuberosus.

30.01.2016 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hedychrum nobile Chrysididae.

30.01.2016 21:04, Alexander Belousov:

The FB has lived and replenished such a topic, why not here to do?
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1633856703542349/1654244264836926/?notif_t=group_activity
You can obedenёnnoy theme - Stamps, postcards, reproductions and other printed matter and media products with insects.. In addition to photos.

30.01.2016 18:26, Peter Khramov:

Igor, old foty replace through new LC?

30.01.2016 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

30.01.2016 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Confidently identified Nezara viridula / Tentatively identified.

30.01.2016 15:38, Peter Khramov:

Yes, infa with photons will be included in Google Maps and, accordingly, appear as a whole at once, and in samples (for example, by taxon). It remains to complete the integration of the card to the site. We are working on it :--)

30.01.2016 15:37, Peter Khramov:

Indeed there is! And then there still will be: -)

30.01.2016 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Confidently identified Rhiginia cruciata / Tentatively identified.

30.01.2016 11:12, Ivan Tislenko:

8000 species illustrated is!

30.01.2016 10:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, Peter! I will try to continue to be more attentive.

30.01.2016 9:48, Ivan Tislenko:

Was the question of automatic collection of information not considered by the distribution and the time of flight from the uploaded photos and presenting it in the form of tables, graphs, maps? With geography, of course, can be a problem - place names malostandartizirovany.But months of flight it is possible to collect and statistically process even - distribution of findings by month, as the probability of encountering this bug.

30.01.2016 7:40, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, "here" is written in the photos of the author, ie, you and other users "here" is not written anything, Bo file name anyone but the author does not apply; -)

30.01.2016 7:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Aphrophora alni / Yuri Semejkin.

30.01.2016 2:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, everything written here Original file name and type: IMG_0066-1 Aphrophora alni.jpg

30.01.2016 2:24, Yuri Semejkin:

I put down

30.01.2016 2:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.01.2016 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dysdercus Dysdercus fuscomaculatus.

29.01.2016 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphosoma lineatum / Vladimir Bobow Graphosoma rubrolineatum / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2016 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygus / Confidently identified Lygus gemellatus / Tentatively identified.

29.01.2016 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygus / Confidently identified Lygus rugulipennis / Tentatively identified.

29.01.2016 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lygus / Confidently identified Lygus wagneri / Tentatively identified.

29.01.2016 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Reduviinae Platymeris biguttata.

29.01.2016 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pyrrhocoridae Probergrothius nigricornis.

29.01.2016 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mermitelocerus Mermitelocerus annulipes.

29.01.2016 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphosoma Graphosoma rubrolineatum.

29.01.2016 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphosoma Graphosoma rubrolineatum.

29.01.2016 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphosoma Graphosoma rubrolineatum.

29.01.2016 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphosoma Graphosoma rubrolineatum.

29.01.2016 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphosoma Graphosoma rubrolineatum.

29.01.2016 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Panaorus Panaorus csikii.

29.01.2016 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Panaorus Panaorus csikii.

29.01.2016 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Panaorus Panaorus csikii.

29.01.2016 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Phytocoris Phytocoris intricatus.

29.01.2016 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pyrrhocoris Pyrrhocoris sinuaticollis.

29.01.2016 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, put down, please date and geography.

29.01.2016 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma Pentatoma semiannulata.

29.01.2016 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elasmostethus Elasmostethus humeralis.

29.01.2016 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tropidothorax Tropidothorax cruciger.

29.01.2016 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Palomena Palomena angulosa.

29.01.2016 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera / Vladimir Bobow Pentatoma semiannulata / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2016 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma Pentatoma metallifera.

29.01.2016 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma Pentatoma metallifera.

29.01.2016 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma Pentatoma metallifera.

29.01.2016 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma Pentatoma metallifera.

29.01.2016 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma Pentatoma semiannulata.

29.01.2016 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomidae Acrocorisellus serraticollis.

29.01.2016 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomidae Acrocorisellus serraticollis.

29.01.2016 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomidae Acrocorisellus serraticollis.

29.01.2016 19:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera / Confidently identified Antilochus coqueberti / Tentatively identified.

29.01.2016 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Harpactorini Cosmolestes picticeps.

29.01.2016 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lethocerus Lethocerus cordofanus.

29.01.2016 18:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Vladimir Bobow Myzia oblongoguttata / Ivan Tislenko.

29.01.2016 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomini Pentatoma.

29.01.2016 16:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Vladimir Bobow Aiolocaria hexaspilota / Ivan Tislenko.

29.01.2016 16:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Vladimir Bobow Aiolocaria hexaspilota / Ivan Tislenko.

29.01.2016 16:33, Ivan Tislenko:

Aiolocaria hexaspilota?

29.01.2016 16:21, Ivan Tislenko:

Aiolocaria hexaspilota?

29.01.2016 16:19, Ivan Tislenko:

Myzia oblongoguttata?

29.01.2016 16:09, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, you have in the comments written that identified the person, and the type is not specified anywhere. Clarified pliz.

29.01.2016 15:17, Peter Khramov:

Basil yesterday on Skype was uncomfortable, now pick up the right to Skype, will be online in the evening.

29.01.2016 14:12, Ivan Tislenko:

By the way, in the same place in 2014 sfotkal another grasshopper - swordsman ordinary http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/516581 - again the first finding in St. Petersburg (according to the same PV Ozersk). And in 2015 already met its "descendants". Interestingly, after such a cold winter in the summer, these grasshoppers appear?

29.01.2016 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, then do not come down more data to them.

29.01.2016 14:03, Ivan Tislenko:

In that article, the findings mentioned in the south of Leningrad. reg., Novgorod and Pskov region https://yadi.sk/i/5pk6zMdSnvW52. After this article, I have not yet met at least a dozen.

29.01.2016 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why is incorrect. Very correct. Sooner still say that if you found it for the first time only this summer.
Just too little time has passed to include Peter in distribution. According unit finds such things are not done (delivery can be anything).

29.01.2016 13:28, Ivan Tislenko:

I have them in the summer of 2015 sfotkal. According to the opinion of PV Ozersk (chief of grasshopper on molbiole) - this is the first discovery in the city (he even co-wrote an article where he mentioned this finding). I'm not even in fact raised the debate, but simply remarked that it was an exemplary example plastinokryl proved incorrect.

29.01.2016 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acrididae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Prumna tristis / Female / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2016 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Orthoptera / Imago / Irina Nikulina Chizuella bonneti / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2016 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tettigoniidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Chizuella bonneti / Female / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2016 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.01.2016 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Must.
And maybe corny unknown or have not been updated.
For a long time he appeared in St. Petersburg?

29.01.2016 12:18, Ivan Tislenko:

St. Petersburg is far from the boundaries of the Central Russia, so the lack of detail is not to be written off. In the right they have to specify the Northern Russia.

29.01.2016 12:13, Ivan Tislenko:

Basil, I'm talking about the card - it is not true. In northern Russia, where they apparently include St. Petersburg, plastinokryl there, but they do not yet know. Here's the map: http://www.faunaeur.org/Maps/display_map.php?map_name=euro&map_language=en&taxon1=403293

29.01.2016 12:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ivan, that geography of (truncated) with the fauna:
"Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Britain, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Turkey, French (mainland), Hungary, Italy (mainland), Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Poland, Portugal (mainland), Romania, Russia (Central,Eastern and Southern parts), Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain (mainland), Switzerland, the Netherlands, Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, Vojvodina, Montenegro, Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Lebanon, Syria, Israel, Jordan, the Sinai Peninsula (Egypt) Arabian peninsula, Iran, Iraq,eastern part of the Palearctic "
For resources of this magnitude it is enough that the three parts of Russia, (including Eastern which includes ET)
But specifically in the city of St. Petersburg and Leningrad region, you can add a personal message (luckily there is a jackdaw in the form of the addition).
P.S.He and Defense (10 km from the borders of Moscow) was first seen by me in 2005. And in the fauna is also not concretized. Mezhdunarodnyyu resources that are usually not involved.

29.01.2016 11:40, Ivan Tislenko:

By the way, said Phaneroptera falcata we in St. Petersburg has already appeared, as http://www.faunaeur.org does not know yet:
http://www.faunaeur.org/Maps/display_map.php?map_name=euro&map_language=en&taxon1=403293

29.01.2016 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cosmolestes picticeps (Stål, 1859)
http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id916285/

29.01.2016 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Harpactorini.

29.01.2016 9:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.01.2016 9:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mantodea / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Mantis religiosa / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

29.01.2016 9:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mantodea / Vladimir Bobow Mantis religiosa / Evgeny Komarov.

29.01.2016 2:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heteroptera Dysdercus.

29.01.2016 2:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Antilochus coqueberti Fabricius, 1803

29.01.2016 1:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Chizuella bonneti Bolívar, I., 1890

29.01.2016 1:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Prumna tristis (Mistshenko, 1951), female

29.01.2016 1:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Chizuella bonneti Bolívar, I., 1890

28.01.2016 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I'm on Skype show up an hour and a half or two. If you will - mayakni there.

28.01.2016 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, himself quote :)
Post on 01/28/2016 12:08:
"Fauna Europaea is only an infinitesimal adequate framework for the dissemination of those taxa that are in the Europe "

28.01.2016 21:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! "I sprinkle his ashes on his head", although it so gray :)

28.01.2016 21:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, emphasize that the only for the European species! Well, they have no basis in species limited East Palearctic and TB rest.

28.01.2016 21:25, Peter Khramov:

Well, Basil. Persuaded. Right now, I call the phone and explain where you're wrong.
ZY Money put on the phone, and then up to you not to call. It would be necessary to discuss the matter floor quickly to remove the snowstorm from the site, while the Cubs have not taken it seriously.

28.01.2016 19:07, Peter Khramov:

PHOTOS brands in the public gallery and the truth is not the place, but if such a thing online zababahat in a separate project.

28.01.2016 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe :) But would-be ispod image - all you can, would be more accurate to say. In Rumyantsev very typical downside.
P.S. A photo brands do not belong here. Some kinds of them have not been shown, it will mark a photo, instead of a butterfly. Subject site is different and no it is not going to change. At least I do not welcome it categorically.Determine try, if you have questions, but no more.

28.01.2016 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So it comes to distributing and Yuri. And the link I gave not the determinant.
To determine not do without qualifiers. But that is another matter.
Sometimes when you make a type of lead is necessary for different graph - different sources.
To specify the spread of best fit all the same general sources of information on the form, and not regional.Regional sources are best suited for their needs, not the result of these types of pages on the Old whose habitat is much wider than the region, which is dedicated to the determinant.
To specify the distribution of species, which are marked in the vast Palaearctic region just Fauna Europaea and gives the most detailed information.

28.01.2016 16:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter is right - in many regional determinants of the data can be more accurately is essential. As an example I can give you incomplete information on the distribution of many species of ground beetles on a magnificent, for all that, the resource carabidae.org
In particular, a recent example. The site for the species Carabus constricticollis stated "Countries and regions: China (Jilin), North Korea, Russia (Maritime Prov).However, the species is distributed much west to Khabarovsk, which is reflected in the "Red Tomiko", ie Determinant of Soviet Far East (the regional). And this very much, so an absolute no resource is impossible.

28.01.2016 16:22, Yuri Semejkin:

From the point of view of Peter agrees. The link Basil - Yes, clearly, colorful, beautiful, except for the text presented maps showing the distribution points, and also shows the places where there is no data on the insect. But that's it. Such a schedule is good for a variety of presentations. But all this is useless when you need to figure out appearance, biology and so on.So without qualifiers is not enough. Basil, I created a shortcut, look more this reference, but the view is unlikely to change.

28.01.2016 16:18, Mihail Voronkov:

Basil, and what about the option that is male Papilio rumanzovia . Rumyantsev sailboat?

28.01.2016 16:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Michael and Memnon is without spurs. As in this photo from my collection: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/38641
But the kind of variability is very similar and there are other types of it.
Therefore, the accuracy of the definition of the image can not be charged with a brand.

28.01.2016 15:38, Mihail Voronkov:

Vasily, thank you for your help.
1 and 4, the definition does not cause difficulties.
2. Parthenos sylvia, yes, the characteristic pattern of "cross-tiger"
3. Papilio memnon, like most photos from the gallery:



as pictured on the stamp is not visible to spur on the hind wings.
* * *
Quote:
But this image of the main galleries to be removed: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/51959
There is still no philatelic website.It is dedicated to insects and photos must be insects, but not to their brand image.
***
I must say that the image of butterflies and others. Insects on stamps may be more than fill the gaps in the gallery of photos, even more so, that the publication of brands of scans has no copyright restrictions, well, except for the author of the scan may be to stick your logo.Here for example:
Telipna transverstigma . Telipna transverstigma is shown on the 2015 block., Earlier marks was not in the picture gallery of the website is also missing.

28.01.2016 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

1) I am writing about what is desirable to take on the Old rasprostanenie of more detailed (everything available, by the way) sources.
2) I write about what is necessary to stop the discussion in that case if it is conducted on the page type clogging it.
In that case, it is sufficient to correct a typographical error, and continue to work without wasting time on discussions kilometer.Peter, and in general it seems to me that the finished result in BM Cerambycidae procedure much earlier than earn your "machine".
Please, it is better to focus on this. Or at least a timely answer about the issues that are once again on your post.

28.01.2016 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and now explain why use them if there are all the resources available where you can specify the accurate and more complete information than from the regional determinant?

28.01.2016 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Basil, why did you write that you do not take on the distribution of the Old?
Basil, why did you write on a regular basis, it is necessary to stop the discussion?
Eugene, do you really do not know how we infa published sources on the site and how it is formalized?
Whew, guys, well, you give!
It seems that hath need rather quick to make out the help section of the site.How then can ordinary users around the deal, if it so neryadovye annealed at times.

28.01.2016 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, in the above example, you need to write "European part of the former Soviet Union."
Basil, with regards to this here:
The determinants that are dedicated to a single state-woo. or a region is better not to use when specifying spread.
It's that all about? Well People believe they can.
Such sources are used quite normally.Remember, when we add the Old of the distribution, we do not have to describe the whole area, we just write the Old to the locality, which was found. And on the page is already combined with other available ifnormatsiey of range.
So, citizens once again. This:
The determinants that are dedicated to a single state-woo.or a region is better not to use when specifying spread.
is a personal opinion of Basil and is not a recommendation to use online Insecta.pro.

28.01.2016 13:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Basil!

28.01.2016 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The country should not be added. Suffice it taxa. It goes all the finds.
Fauna Europaea is only an infinitesimal an adequate framework for the dissemination of those taxa that are in Europe.
For example: Phaneroptera falcata me close to home gallops. Because of her, and brought.
But there appears infa on the entire range (not only in Europe).
So, I recommend :)

28.01.2016 11:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily, I have several browsers: Amigo, mail , Google, Yandex. But the site I do not see the insects komand.iz table. In an Internet looked, there except for the genus and species offer more to enter the country where the insect lives. Maybe that is not so do, then another look.
Ps dotted line does not necessarily highlight was common interface.

28.01.2016 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The link http://www.faunaeur.org/distribution.php
Page looks exactly the same in the three browsers.
Looks like that:

He stressed dotted line where to drive and what to press.
Well, then according to the instructions (above) :)

28.01.2016 10:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil! I do not see at line Genus and species Accordingly, I can not include a search and see the results in the table. Like the entire interface is examined. I just below the show all units is a long line where you can write everything you need and include search, and if you need to move on Yandex

28.01.2016 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, instead of responding in this way, you would have resulted in the form in which the information is needed, and I have brought an example of how this infa sought this power.For example, same-Phaneroptera falcata
Beat in line Genus genus name
A string name of the species Species
Click the Search button
Then, the obtained result, click Display in table
And you will see the difference between this site and the spread specified in Faune Europaea

28.01.2016 9:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil did not need me to give examples with shelves, it looks like a page with the addition of information.

28.01.2016 9:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil! Then what to use? Dr. No sources. Waiting when will publish a new one? Determinant, it is still a kind approved, accepted the document, unlike inetovskih viewpoints. Just would like to insect enthusiasts somehow guided that they inhabit and how it looks and what net.I so on.The site is part of all this only in Lepidoptera may be the above questions indicate that ... the European part of Russia (USSR) - like everything all in this case is clear. Or give up on everything by hand and let everyone is looking for the Old where it can.
Opinions still be?

28.01.2016 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, so I started this, and :) best not to use tkie sources.
Yuri, an example of the source where everything is laid out on shelves: http://www.faunaeur.org/distribution.php

28.01.2016 8:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, Basil, you can list the state, if you know what this kind of there. And then write or Lithuania, Moldova, and the species range only in the Russian Federation. You just need to look for when sources with more accurate guidance range.

28.01.2016 8:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.01.2016 8:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Confidently identified Carabus schrencki / Tentatively identified.

28.01.2016 8:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Saperda carcharias / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.01.2016 8:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus smaragdinus Carabus.

28.01.2016 7:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vladimir Bobow Carabus smaragdinus / Evgeny Komarov.

28.01.2016 7:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The determinants that are dedicated to a single state-woo. or a region is better not to use when specifying the distribution.
It is necessary to use obobschennnye sources where the spread of the countries indicated. The insect can be extended not only to the USSR or Russia
In your case, probably it is necessary to transfer state-va.Previously included as republics e.ch. THE USSR.

28.01.2016 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aeshna crenata / Tentatively identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.01.2016 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Sympetrum croceolum / Confidently identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.01.2016 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Sympetrum croceolum / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.01.2016 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Libellula quadrimaculata / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.01.2016 7:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Libellula quadrimaculata / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.01.2016 7:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Libellula quadrimaculata / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.01.2016 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Trigomphus nigripes / Confidently identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.01.2016 7:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Vladimir Bobow Coenagrion johanssoni / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.01.2016 7:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Phaneropteridae Phaneroptera falcata.

28.01.2016 3:26, Yuri Semejkin:

I do not want to create a separate topic on a small matter, so I am here. And he is. When referring to literary sources, for example: to insects of the Far East of the USSR under the spread indicated-European part of the USSR.As correctly points-European part of Russia? or according to the book, to which reference is made European part of the USSR?

28.01.2016 2:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes

28.01.2016 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Coenagrion johanssoni

28.01.2016 1:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Trigomphus nigripes

28.01.2016 1:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Libellula quadrimaculata

28.01.2016 1:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Libellula quadrimaculata

28.01.2016 1:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Libellula quadrimaculata

28.01.2016 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum croceolum

28.01.2016 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum croceolum

28.01.2016 1:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aeshna crenata♂ - inaccurately

28.01.2016 0:43, Evgeny Komarov:

While here http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t153418.html both options are for the south of Khabarovsk Krai. Including an open question.

28.01.2016 0:35, Evgeny Komarov:

There is another option, although the identity of the Khabarovsk Territory is not specified, but likely - Cicindela (Cicindela) gemmata Faldermann, 1835. Look closely later.

28.01.2016 0:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela sylvatica / Confidently identified Cicindela sachalinensis / Tentatively identified.

28.01.2016 0:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Hurry up, even on the signs I did not look. But then there is another option - Cicindela (Cicindela) sachalinensis raddei A.Morawitz, 1862. This form is only for Primorye yet been specified. Khabarovsk region, something brand new for me so far. But nothing more, in my view, alas. Put in is inaccurate.

27.01.2016 23:08, Irina Nikulina:

Phaneroptera falcata?

27.01.2016 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, as the upper lip white with him.
Here silvatika classic (upper lip is black, with a longitudinal keel): http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43599
Maybe someone else?

27.01.2016 20:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Cicindela sylvatica / Evgeny Komarov.

27.01.2016 20:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysomela populi / Evgeny Komarov.

27.01.2016 20:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Chrysomela populi / Evgeny Komarov.

27.01.2016 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Meganoton analis Meganoton analis sumatranus.

27.01.2016 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Meganoton analis Meganoton analis sumatranus.

27.01.2016 14:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Express that it Epidaus tuberosus Yang, 1940

27.01.2016 14:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Express that it Epidaus tuberosus Yang, 1940

27.01.2016 12:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Sorry! Description Pentatoma metallifera (Motschulsky, 1859 in the determinant of insects is given on page 928, not 923.

27.01.2016 11:22, Irina Nikulina:

Acrocorisellus serraticollis

27.01.2016 11:22, Irina Nikulina:

Acrocorisellus serraticollis

27.01.2016 11:20, Irina Nikulina:

There certainly is no need to migrate to the mind when it will be made

27.01.2016 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, there is no mushrooms everything is clear :)
With the exception of Memnon, perhaps.
By the way, collect mushrooms traditional)))
Like these ones:

Nothing untoward. Asks people - define :)

27.01.2016 10:43, Alexander Belousov:

That the recommendations made public fungi need to eat, to see a certain butterfly. :-)

27.01.2016 1:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Top row:
Iphiclides podaliriusandParthenos sylvia
Bottom row:
Papilio memnonBizkit or I see someone andAglais io
But this image of the main galleries to be removed: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/51959
There is still no philatelic website. It is dedicated to insects and photos must be insects, but not to their brand image.

27.01.2016 0:19, Mihail Voronkov:

The question formulated in the title of the theme:
on postage stamps showing species of butterflies are often unsigned name of the species, but in this issue and need assistance.
Original Source:


unspecified types:

27.01.2016 0:16, Irina Nikulina:

Pentatoma metallifera

27.01.2016 0:15, Irina Nikulina:

Pentatoma semiannulata

27.01.2016 0:13, Irina Nikulina:

Palomena angulosa

26.01.2016 17:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, I have now realized that to introduce "by hand" in the kinds of cases where they like in 50 or more, and I'm just such a group bring in the divine form, is absolutely irrational. Therefore, I will write to you, where it is desirable (if possible) to transfer species from Carabidae.org. There's birth a hundred or more species much. And then I do the hair.
I just try to do everything at once, ie,structure to species.

26.01.2016 4:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! And so long view does not start? If you have any questions, ambiguities, it may have sounded (can be in the L / R). I would have tried to find out the pros

25.01.2016 21:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, here's another http://molbiol.ru/forums/uploads/a001/b073/post-14455-1221019708.jpg

25.01.2016 20:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri rights! And with these two types of site, in my opinion, the confusion!

25.01.2016 20:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, and what of this definition http://insecta.pro/images/1024/44814.jpg?

25.01.2016 15:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene ! There is no doubt that this Pentatoma metallifera. This species does so. See painting. Http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/44814 This is also referred to the insects in the Soviet Union, Volume 2, page 923. Upper body-green, shiny metallic.

25.01.2016 15:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera / Vladimir Bobow Dolycoris baccarum / Yuri Semejkin.

25.01.2016 15:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Graphosoma lineatum, -Etogo kind of geography in the area such as the observed. I would say that this Graphosoma rubrolineatum (Westwood, 1837) .- This species is in the Khabarovsk Territory.

25.01.2016 15:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Pentatoma semiannulata (Motschulsky, 1860)

25.01.2016 14:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Dolycoris baccarum, (Linnaeus, 1758)

25.01.2016 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera / Vladimir Bobow Eurydema gebleri / Yuri Semejkin.

25.01.2016 14:49, Peter Khramov:

I add. But not now.

25.01.2016 14:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Eurydema gebleri Kolenati, 1846 -Sibirsky cruciferous bug.

25.01.2016 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So add this kind of all.
Geography true because, like my aunt caught him :)

25.01.2016 14:39, Peter Khramov:

Placing a genus it is dictated by the absence of the species in the database.

25.01.2016 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The formulation is dictated by only the genus?
You can view and close up, leaning on my link: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id701829/
In p. Neil belostomatid one type - "Nile Belostoma" (see. One of the synonyms) :)

25.01.2016 14:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Lethocerus.

25.01.2016 13:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera / Vladimir Bobow Pentatoma / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Pentatoma metallifera (Motschulsky, 1859).

25.01.2016 13:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera / Vladimir Bobow Pentatoma / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Pentatoma metallifera (Motschulsky, 1859). Who has the right to have bugs - add a view!

25.01.2016 13:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Staphylinidae / Ivan Pristrem Aleochara / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Staphylinidae / Ivan Pristrem Philonthus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Staphylinidae / Ivan Pristrem Philonthus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Staphylinidae / Ivan Pristrem Velleius dilatatus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Staphylinidae / Ivan Pristrem Philonthus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Dasytes niger / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Staphylinidae / Ivan Pristrem Aleocharinae / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Staphylinidae / Ivan Pristrem Aleocharinae / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Enicopus / Ivan Pristrem Enicopus pilosus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hispa atra / Ivan Pristrem Trox hispidus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Meloidae / Ivan Pristrem Alosimus syriacus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthicidae / Ivan Pristrem Notoxus monoceros / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:14, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, and it was, but in this mode Lepidoptera was not glued all the way to the insects with TZ Yandex and sticking it would like to ...

25.01.2016 13:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthicidae / Ivan Pristrem Notoxus monoceros / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthicidae / Ivan Pristrem Notoxus monoceros / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hispa atra / Ivan Pristrem Trox hispidus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hispa atra / Ivan Pristrem Trox hispidus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 13:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthicidae / Ivan Pristrem Anthracus consputus / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

25.01.2016 11:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trox hispidus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 11:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trox hispidus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 11:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Silpha obscura / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

25.01.2016 11:17, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?md=read;id=125813
http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?md=read;id=125666
This is not Oligia strigilis, and these species can be determined only by gen. exam.

25.01.2016 8:52, Shamil Murtazin:

I propose to redirect on the old link - lepidoptera.ru, do the Russian version insekty.pro

25.01.2016 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Victor, with the arrival :)
Welcome )))

25.01.2016 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Eugene. For Metallica, it draws only feet (
Something unusual. Let pobudet is in the family.
Maybe later somebody fresh ideas will :)

24.01.2016 21:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, metallica - the only kind that, from existing in the region, it can be assumed. But I have a series of these edge - does not look like much. Although, you never know ...

24.01.2016 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe Protaetia / Potosia be easily (white knees like P. metallica). Generally for such green to bring up sort of have to see the bottom. There is no process mesothorax - guesswork in my opinion.

24.01.2016 20:28, Evgeny Komarov:

I would safely say that this Cetonia aurata, but she was, supposedly, no ... Nothing else of specified for the region, it never comes!

24.01.2016 20:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clivina / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.01.2016 20:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Somewhere boot did not finish!

24.01.2016 20:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Clivina laevifrons Clivina ypsilon.

24.01.2016 18:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Diacheila arctica Diacheila polita.

24.01.2016 17:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I thought relatively Cerambycidae
1) It makes sense to walk through the abandoned (there are in the family and nowhere else) leave here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/840777
On the subject of the assignment of the author and year of description. This will reduce the manual work at least twice.
2) You can also walk on the species composition of absolutely everywhere for compliance. Types I almost did not touch him.
The rest is done by hand.So it will be in my view more correct.
And fix it please my school here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/161469
There should be all out of "For more information about the larva" to move in the "For more information about the adult stage"
Accidentally field beguiled ((

24.01.2016 15:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anogcodes / Ivan Pristrem Anogcodes ustulatus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.01.2016 15:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Coincidentally, who does not happen))) It's okay)

24.01.2016 15:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.01.2016 15:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, I'm sorry, but look at your time and my definition - I could not see that until you've determined the type, while introducing the name :) I only saw the determination to Cetoniina !.

24.01.2016 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, why?
Such moves should be obsnyat to questions did not arise for him.

24.01.2016 14:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Komarov.

24.01.2016 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cetoniinae / Vladimir Bobow Gnorimus subopacus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.01.2016 14:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cetoniinae / Vladimir Bobow Cetonia magnifica / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.01.2016 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Glycyphana fulvistemma / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.01.2016 8:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Trichodes Trichodes ircutensis.

24.01.2016 8:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Meloidae / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Trichodes / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.01.2016 8:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.01.2016 8:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Meloidae / Vladimir Bobow Brachyta variabilis / Evgeny Komarov.

24.01.2016 8:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Meloidae / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Leptura duodecimguttata / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.01.2016 8:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.01.2016 8:33, Evgeny Komarov:

By location and appearance ssp. testaceimembris (Pic, 1916), if for Danilevsky.

24.01.2016 8:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vladimir Bobow Brachyta variabilis / Evgeny Komarov.

24.01.2016 8:19, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. bowringi Chaudoir, 1863

24.01.2016 8:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae Carabus vietinghoffi.

24.01.2016 8:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bobow Evgeny Komarov.

23.01.2016 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, birch and alder close relatives. I just have a little alder in the county.
And he certainly is wherever conditions correspond)

23.01.2016 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Meloe / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 17:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Not only among the birches, but also among the alder. Most likely it is the two others. Species are also suitable geography prefer other places. In particular, E. humeralis eats seeds of umbrella and E. brevis common among Salix and Chosenia.

23.01.2016 16:40, Sun wenhao90:

Neptis hylas

23.01.2016 16:39, Sun wenhao90:

Neptis soma

23.01.2016 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elasmostethus / Confidently identified Elasmostethus interstinctus / Tentatively identified.

23.01.2016 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if there is, it means I'm right with high probability :)
I stand in inaccurate to clarify ..
Do yourself, oh and have I seen him. It likes to fly to the light in particular where there are birch))

23.01.2016 15:27, Yuri Semejkin:

For this kind of geography Elasmostethus interstinctus there. Rod agreed, and with a view do not know.

23.01.2016 15:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Coleophoridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.01.2016 15:22, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, even if the definition of the order to be affixed during / after the download, right?

23.01.2016 15:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

23.01.2016 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Dysauxes ancilla / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.01.2016 15:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Phytometra viridaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.01.2016 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Psychidae / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.01.2016 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Do you think (and discuss with Eugene), maybe that is not already done by the hands, should go to the (semi) automatic machine first with your sites, and then your hands to finish.

23.01.2016 15:07, Peter Khramov:

Because there is no data in Russian. In the foreseeable future, I will do so at least infa broadcast in English.

23.01.2016 15:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Artiora evonymaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.01.2016 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elasmostethus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, bug :)
More specifically Elasmostethus sp.
More precisely: it is possibleElasmostethus interstinctus
The truth is, I do not know, whether the type of the specified geography.
So while I put in the genus.

23.01.2016 13:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Bug. The order Hemiptera

23.01.2016 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Elaphria venustula / Irina Nikulina.

23.01.2016 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Sabra harpagula / Irina Nikulina.

23.01.2016 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Larva / Yuri Semejkin.

23.01.2016 12:03, Yuri Semejkin:

The order Hemiptera

23.01.2016 11:32, Irina Nikulina:

Elaphria venustula

23.01.2016 11:25, Irina Nikulina:

Sabra harpagula

23.01.2016 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, figure it out, please why all photos unknown in the Russian version. The English version of the data is present.

23.01.2016 9:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2016 1:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, the fact that I have not got to the core at a time even before the end of this resource. Therefore I do not want to recommend.
Only later I made the final decision to build on the site barbel system based mostly on him.
Now here handles all have to do. Brought to an end in time, if you have already started.
You commas main banish once more.Often fall where they do not (
Well shape top of the page if you can lift. It will be more convenient to work and then come in handy.
Break through))

23.01.2016 0:41, Peter Khramov:

And what for to spend the week to do hands? I said at the beginning, if so, where to get a crowd, let's Cap'n Skopje, which is still hand-threshing? ..

22.01.2016 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There's also where they take me :)
By Usachev such data here: http://cerambycidae.org/taxa

22.01.2016 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Maybe it still is where to get information, not to handle?

22.01.2016 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well at the moment I wander through the barbel in order to place orphan kind of place.
When we have to do at least two kinds of operation for:
1) Setting in place.
2) The assignment of the author and year (for the most part there is no orphan childbirth)
Example only made revision: http: // insecta.pro / ru / taxonomy / 841,291
1655 births happened in the subfamily, and most of them worked as handles. And all it took almost a week.
The essence of the question to make a minimum of gestures.
The work of such a plan has a lot. And the hair stand on end the feeling that remains to be done in addition ...
When I proposed the motion, the amount will be reduced.It is a fact.

22.01.2016 16:54, Peter Khramov:

I presume that the curator haunting taxa not only for editing. With regards to rewind - Basil, you're an advanced user. Surely you rewound to be at the bottom of the page and otredatirovat something? Hold End, and you are right on the spot.

22.01.2016 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.01.2016 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.01.2016 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.01.2016 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Scopula subpunctaria / Zoran Bozovic Scopula nigropunctata / Basil Sergienko.

22.01.2016 16:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Remove from the group according to the author's comments.

22.01.2016 16:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

22.01.2016 16:13, Basil Sergienko:

nigropunctata

22.01.2016 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudoips prasinana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.01.2016 14:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tortrix viridana / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Not identified.

22.01.2016 12:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And another question, prompted by the work of a higher level taxa species.
It is impossible, whether the form of "Edit taxon" to move from the bottom to the very top of the page?
So I think it will be much easier and faster to work with them.Somehow nekuzyavo squander every time down the page to edit the taxon ((
Especially annoying if taxon is large and it is necessary to edit more than once .....
But if the form is at the top - will be much more comfortable to work for those who engaged in it)))

22.01.2016 10:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae Limodromus krynickii.

22.01.2016 10:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Carabidae oversees Eugene. He was with her and will understand. I'm not strong in them. That's why I do not climb.
Especially without the accuracy of determining the geography may have questions.
From admin I pulled because there could be hung. And here pronounced.

22.01.2016 9:58, Peter Khramov:

Basil, what's the problem? No species, so can be repaired. And where does the admin panel?

22.01.2016 7:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the admin stand as Platynus krynickii (Sperk, 1835) (literally).
By author:
Date and geography are the "second half" of each photo)

22.01.2016 7:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Carabidae.

21.01.2016 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you have to keep two kinds of one:
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/599240
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/170680
And to remove all of them from one kind of Paraëthecerus sexmaculatus Bruch, 1926
This kind of beetle, standing in the eponymous old, but only in the long-horned beetles: http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/sexmaculatus-Bruch-1926
The barbel I did this kind of a view. Therefore it is possible and unite: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1036274
With pereponami work I have no rights and therefore Usachev had to create a separate genus)))

21.01.2016 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleophoridae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.01.2016 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here, perhaps there is an error when loading photo Pocket.

21.01.2016 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Craniophora ligustri / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.01.2016 13:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here, perhaps there is an error when loading photo Pocket.

21.01.2016 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena irregularis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.01.2016 13:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Teinoptera olivina / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Not identified.

21.01.2016 13:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pleurota aristella / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Not identified.

21.01.2016 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pleurota aristella / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Not identified.

19.01.2016 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Saturniidae / Shirley Sekarajasingham Antherina suraka / Alex Dumchus.

19.01.2016 7:56, Alex Dumchus:

And other species in the genus is not. And it is only in Madagascar. Carry part.

19.01.2016 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas orientalis Euphydryas aurinia.

19.01.2016 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas orientalis Euphydryas aurinia.

19.01.2016 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas orientalis Euphydryas aurinia.

19.01.2016 7:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas orientalis Euphydryas aurinia.

19.01.2016 7:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas orientalis Euphydryas aurinia.

19.01.2016 7:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas orientalis Euphydryas aurinia.

19.01.2016 7:10, Evgeny Komarov:

Pts. It seems that it is.

18.01.2016 20:01, Alex Dumchus:

Antherina suraka?

18.01.2016 18:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Basil, corrected. :)

18.01.2016 18:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hepialidae Hesperiidae.

18.01.2016 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander did not put it there. Correct)

18.01.2016 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Hepialidae / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.01.2016 13:49, Peter Khramov:

I put down the geography and notes.

18.01.2016 12:56, Peter Khramov:

From the Russian - a little, yes: -) You may be able to make today a permutation in the Russian version. And for those that are loaded earlier to make a direct right now.

18.01.2016 12:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then another thing))
Just a few drops in there ...

18.01.2016 12:51, Peter Khramov:

These photos with geography, but in English and, accordingly, is visible in the English UI. Who is doing so in the Russian version was visible even geography and English.

18.01.2016 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter and all of these photos without geography?
If all - then what is the value of these photos for the site?
After all, most of the photo is determined at best to sort, if not to the unit .....
Without geography sometimes say something very problematic (

18.01.2016 9:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Shirley Sekarajasingham Geometridae / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.01.2016 0:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

18.01.2016 0:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

17.01.2016 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Alex Lender Calvia decemguttata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.01.2016 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Alex Lender Lagria hirta / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.01.2016 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Imago / Alex Lender Prionus coriarius / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.01.2016 11:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Trichoptera

17.01.2016 11:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Trichoptera

17.01.2016 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Delias hyparete / Alex Dumchus.

17.01.2016 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieridae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Delias hyparete / Alex Dumchus.

17.01.2016 10:13, Evgeny Komarov:

If you can gun commas - it is better so. Similarly, in full Carabidae and most likely in other beetles!

17.01.2016 9:51, Alex Dumchus:

Delias hyparete

17.01.2016 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Commas actually a lot where there is no (
Already caught a number of taxa in barbel (not considered).
Correct necessary. I just do not have it ....

17.01.2016 1:18, Peter Khramov:

If supraspecific taxa anywhere and can never be parentheses, I can cut them automatically. Commas have a gun was setting, be strange if there were new taxa without them. Clean.
ZY Regarding comma between author and year worth soared. Because specific to Insectoids is specifically spelled out in the rules of downloading new taxa: -)

17.01.2016 1:15, Peter Khramov:

The site is regularly required to upload pictures of authors who can not do it yourself. Until recently I was engaged only now beginning to deal with these more Shamil Murtazin. But many photos (tens of thousands) that we need more people.Administrative part - pre-selection of specific images from the set of editing text data about them, etc. do not have to deal with (of course, if you do not have the desire to separate) is required, basically, a simple / quick pre-retouching in Photoshop or something like that - crop, tweak color / tone.If you have the opportunity to take up the case or have questions - write in this thread or contact me in any way indicated on the contact page http://insecta.pro/ru/contacts.

16.01.2016 21:02, Shamil Murtazin:

The culprit confessed. Reconfigure the default font size =)

16.01.2016 15:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, too, in my braces should only be in the forms. The higher taxa should try to do without them.
On Cerambycidae. org brackets in the above kind of taxa in my not yet come across. And Usachev build the system according to this site.
The species is still necessary to set the brackets ...... Horror (where they are not full). Only emotions ((

16.01.2016 14:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Aah! This is my only way or decrease text on the site? .. All adjust the appearance of already dropped - does not help)
P.S. in the browser business ... it has not yet decided the issue.

16.01.2016 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, with the genus problem is present in the form of two kinds. Amesia - Erasmia. Let the photos be in one genus, and the curator will decide which kind of leave can be :)

16.01.2016 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amesia Erasmia sanguiflua.

16.01.2016 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amesia Erasmia sanguiflua.

16.01.2016 14:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, comma between the author about a year. As I understand it, it is no where not specifically spelled out and steamed about it not worth it. Even in periodicals, where this comma is required where the fact that it had not been. Where's all the same. :) I'm here I can not understand what the author and the kind of higher taxa in brackets? It should not be.

16.01.2016 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I have such an interest in idle)
What is the base from which this kind were driven to the site Cerambycidae?
All sorts suppressed from the destination name of the author and year of description (((
Watch should be the kind that is still standing in the family: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/840777
I was a little annoying ('ll deal with time). Just wondering.
Now is important.You can not in any way place commas where they do not automatically? A comma between the author and the year where there is a lot of (((
Their absence is very annoying at the time, when the head is quite a different focus.

16.01.2016 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alex Dumchus.

16.01.2016 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alex Dumchus.

16.01.2016 10:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Amesia sanguiflua =Erasmia sanguiflua :)

16.01.2016 8:26, Alex Dumchus:

Erasmia sanguiflua?

15.01.2016 22:39, Peter Khramov:

I'm for the confiscation of nets too. The more confiscated, the more need to buy again. A confiscated to do something with the same ought to be. In general, arrange cycling nets among the people.

15.01.2016 20:58, Alex Dumchus:

With reference to our site - to confiscate nets :) I was a couple of years ago in Sri Lanka, and heard a story that a German collector, put on a year (there- in their prisons !!!) for catching a few troidesov. For wild ornithopter, too, they say, in Indonesia can be in prison to please.As we begin a campaign of kinks to be (((as in kollektiviztsii s / h 20s .... God forbid. For swallowtail on the bench ...

15.01.2016 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With me you can remove :) In the end, the very first man on whom this menyalka initially and run-))

15.01.2016 17:16, Peter Khramov:

I remind you that we do not remove the old. We remove the new and the old change new ones. Therefore, if the 3:00 passed, I will remove you a new one, and then you must restart it to replace the old.
In addition, you may want to remove the time limit for experienced users who should not have been wrong. On the other hand, judging by the questions. Ugh ...

15.01.2016 15:45, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Eugene, thank you! It is easy to understand for such "dummies" like me.)))

15.01.2016 15:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Vladimir, in the "Edit" in the "Determination (species or other taxa)," enter the name of the unit / family / genus / species - triggered auto-fit (if this taxon is in the database) are taking it all. Then the bottom presses "Refresh data and delete the marked images" and photos goes to the specified taxon.Or, just when downloading pictures do the same in the "name of the taxon (the subspecies to a subclass or leave blank if the taxon is not defined.) For example, Parnassius apollo:" Once work automatical ...

15.01.2016 15:28, Evgeny Komarov:

So we have the same 3:00 :)! I'm still waiting for your answer about not received a replacement, three hours have passed, including Now only the old prowess, all the description of the new I did.

15.01.2016 13:37, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Basil, a post that I saw, but How to download yourself in the genus (and so on) there is not a word. Which line should I boot taxon register?

15.01.2016 13:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, with the same success you can put yourself right in the genus.
Please read the post title if they themselves have not yet seen: http://insecta.pro/ru/community/50634

15.01.2016 13:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helina / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

15.01.2016 13:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helina / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

15.01.2016 9:45, Peter Khramov:

In terms of 2546 to remove? Well you have to replace it, but a new, if not removed, can be removed. Or something I do not catch up ...

15.01.2016 6:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Only now that's daring Photo # 2546, which is not a replacement! Substitute something I downloaded then.

15.01.2016 6:08, Evgeny Komarov:

OK!

15.01.2016 1:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

15.01.2016 1:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Indeed male recover.

15.01.2016 1:07, Peter Khramov:

Basil, what do you say?

15.01.2016 1:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I see restored. Now everything is fine. Thank you.

15.01.2016 1:02, Peter Khramov:

Fixed limitations. If the author is the author of the previous definition - the time is not limited.

15.01.2016 0:48, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, all the rules, you simply do not bear up to the end were right. Now I put down.

15.01.2016 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why do not you want to? It is completely different angles.

15.01.2016 0:02, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, I mean, there are a lot of people who talk to the rangers will not, and then make a thread in the little things do not mind. And it's quite a fine.

14.01.2016 23:58, Peter Khramov:

Just LK corrected wording and on the public not. Now I corrected. Now the link Basil is also side / underside, without wings. Private jackdaw is not required.

14.01.2016 22:11, Eugene Matveev:

самец. У самки крылья округлые.

14.01.2016 22:05, Evgeny Komarov:

I agree with Vasily.

14.01.2016 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Still need to add a separate checkbox "Side view" (other solutions can not see).
Mixing two different angles into a single daw "Side / underside" is wrong.
For example: Now put this common daw here: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46595
Well, what is it, underside of the wings ??
N.B. The word "wings" is now removed altogether logical.In the end, even if the picture is spread butterflies, then it is a perspective view of the top or underside, not only the wings.
And because it is an extension of the site has even become "neither here nor there"

14.01.2016 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I, Peter seems to stand still (or do not work) time limit, even despite the fact that the definition of types of mine.
This is evidenced by the sight of my LC immediately after loading the new photos:

And there was a field, and pozunok active ....
Conclusion: to deal with these notorious time constraints.

14.01.2016 19:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Not sure. And you're not sure, and even an employee of the McDuck not sure. A question was originally to tighten legislation to combat poaching. What impact this will have - the author of the petition, according to the text, little understood.I do not fully understand the implications of all of this, because even though doing something similar or indirectly know the stories with the same rangers about the situation, but in the legislative field is not guided, the more I do not know the subtleties. In a bid to try to figure out - answer a proposal "to sacrifice a thousand."Then why bother to propose such initiatives? Without knowing the private - to try to reach a common ... Yes, it can get. Direction of travel is correct, way of realization for me is uncertain.

14.01.2016 19:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, so that there is a substitute for something? To find out why did not happen!

14.01.2016 18:15, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. And why are you sure you are not part of the bracelet with money does not go as intended? ..

14.01.2016 17:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomelidae / Confidently identified / Marina Bandurina.

14.01.2016 17:09, Marina Bandurina:

Larva Coleoptera Chrysomelidae family (Chrysomelidae).

14.01.2016 16:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, check, correct and put an end to it :)
The issue is an important and not subject to delay.

14.01.2016 16:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, because it is complacency. How to buy bracelets McDuck (sorry for the analogy).
A huntsman, what? You go to any private reserve and they will find you, especially in the winter on the track =)))

14.01.2016 16:16, Peter Khramov:

«Ok, I check and accomplish your goal like that."

14.01.2016 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now, the essence of my problem.
It is as follows:

1) There is no field of "Refinement (form)"
2) Inactive slider "Stage of Development / Gender"
We must deal with this.

14.01.2016 13:48, Peter Khramov:

Eugene now checked all the rules you have. In sedated taymautnye field only, with the rest all the rules.

14.01.2016 13:33, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, Come. You can deal with issues with varying degrees gimor. Well, what the huntsman? It's like a charity, someone lists a thousand rubles a month, and regulations, as someone volunteering from morning till night. Do not offer the same to everyone somehow touches the question volonterstvovat the full program!

14.01.2016 13:30, Peter Khramov:

... Now I look, there ...

14.01.2016 13:30, Peter Khramov:

Correctly. Needless to indulge! -))

14.01.2016 13:03, Alex Dumchus:

Precis sp

14.01.2016 13:03, Alex Dumchus:

Some African, type P. nireus

14.01.2016 12:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Eugene, then I suggest you in your region go on the hunt. Ask how to hunt and how to put it actually happens, talk to the same rangers. If you deal with the issue, it seems to me that you need to be inside the situation.

14.01.2016 12:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, I have all the fields are inactive in the editing section in the LC.

14.01.2016 11:48, Eugene Davkaev:

Shamil, and can operate on a regional and national scale, of course, but there are problems of poaching across the country (here's an example: https://planeta.ru/campaigns/eger_help and another selection on the page for the link), and fight poachers need throughout the country, but not limited to their area.Supporting such a petition, I do not think about what would happen tomorrow, I am acting in accordance with its capabilities TODAY.

14.01.2016 11:41, Peter Khramov:

UP: exactly Madagascar, just infa from English to Russian version has not yet passed.

14.01.2016 11:40, Peter Khramov:

It looks like Madagascar. Now load this author is engaged in ph Shamil Murtazin, as will be online, probably, will complement the information on the downloaded yesterday fotam.

14.01.2016 8:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Africa?

14.01.2016 8:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The exhibition where a 30% collection. No photo. Kallofrisa also not- I do not fond of copper-butterfly.

14.01.2016 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I check it, and then how to accomplish your goal.

13.01.2016 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now it is clear. Leaves may be replaced within 3 hours after loading the new one. This is normal.
Regarding the fields of sex change and clarify the definition:
The author of the definition of the latter, loaded me personally I am beetles.
Nevertheless, the field of sex change I is inactive, and the field to clarify the classification and absent in lux.

13.01.2016 23:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Loepa katinka / Igor Ivannikov Loepa anthera / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.01.2016 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Done.

13.01.2016 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Limitation to replace ph concerns not loading time of ancient photos that we are changing, and load time a new picture, in which we are changing.
Restrictions to clarify the definition, the definition and the floor refer to those cases where the author of a photo is not the author of determination. Further develop the idea? ..

13.01.2016 21:55, Evgeny Komarov:

I agree with Vasily! Peter, explaining the meaning of time constraints on the ability to edit photos. I do not really understand the benefit of this.

13.01.2016 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And further. Where is the instant access to the line "Clarification of classification (shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age"
Now what to do if presented subspecies on the photo is not listed, and you find out he had it some time after loading a photo ???
I do not speak about the form, aberrations, etc., etc. .............

13.01.2016 21:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Need to split group - #51009 and #51010

13.01.2016 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, do it here: "Replacing the old image with a new photo (if you have such rights): 3:00 " without time constraints, as it was. I do not understand the meaning of the introduction of time limits here. Expediency?
Often the photo and replaced in a year or two after the download.So as uncomfortable and unnecessary excesses in the form of time limits were in the field with the floor of the insect ((.
Time constraints here, too, should not be.

13.01.2016 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Now you can enter and change data for your uploaded photos in more comfortable and fast manner, especially in cases with partial duplicated data. In addition to changing the interface we've added detailed info about all editable fields — under the cat on the top of the page, in the table header and as fields pop-ups.

13.01.2016 18:47, Shamil Murtazin:

ACallophrys butleroviMigranov, 1991 there?

13.01.2016 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus Chorthippus macrocerus.

13.01.2016 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus Chorthippus macrocerus.

13.01.2016 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus Chorthippus macrocerus.

13.01.2016 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus Chorthippus macrocerus.

13.01.2016 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus Chorthippus macrocerus.

13.01.2016 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus Chorthippus macrocerus.

13.01.2016 16:06, Ivan Pristrem:

Chorthippus macrocerus. Paul identified Ozersk.

13.01.2016 16:04, Ivan Pristrem:

Chorthippus macrocerus. Paul identified Ozersk.

13.01.2016 15:58, Ivan Pristrem:

Chorthippus macrocerus. Paul identified Ozersk.

13.01.2016 15:57, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. Your collection? If your, upload pictures of boxes. At least daily, and of Saturn hawk moth pliiz.

13.01.2016 15:57, Ivan Pristrem:

Chorthippus macrocerus. Paul identified Ozersk.

13.01.2016 15:54, Ivan Pristrem:

Chorthippus macrocerus. Paul identified Ozersk.

13.01.2016 15:51, Ivan Pristrem:

Chorthippus macrocerus. Paul identified Ozersk.

13.01.2016 10:01, Peter Khramov:

Accordingly, the first to be a text field in which this information is available, but it should not necessarily be a separate field. Here I am about.

13.01.2016 7:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus brevis / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus serripes / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.01.2016 7:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Aha! Excellent!

12.01.2016 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Signs Online formalized on the basis of available textual information.
Accordingly, the first should be a text field.
And really, is whether to formalize these symptoms - it is possible to continue to discuss later.
Just can not grasp the immensity (it will be delayed for years). And it shifted the ball rolling right.

12.01.2016 22:50, Peter Khramov:

Basil, discussing the case does not interfere. With regards to the field - unless we stayed at it is that it will generally be separate? Do not formalized, namely the text.

12.01.2016 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, as seen from above and from the tribe. It's called "The child taxa" and is located below the photo.
For example: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/840979
At birth in this place it is just a link "Forms" , which leads to the catalog.

12.01.2016 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, let it be "prey" (in the end it is the essence does not change significantly).
Other worries: here we pour in fact "a sieve", and the case is in the dead center (
It's a shame when you have the information, but it is simply no place to drive ((
Do not gud (
It's time to do and not to hold a discussion which is already 2 months sluggish stretches.

12.01.2016 20:48, Evgeny Komarov:

And where this is, Peter? Have not found!

12.01.2016 20:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, here do not agree totally. Yes, we are not "academic research" site, but it should avoid unnecessary word creation. There are clear, the term "food items", "preferences" something from another opera.Since then, as there were added not only herbivores, the term "krmovye plant" is insufficient to describe the food specialization (a term, incidentally, can also be used). "Prey" or "specialty food" immediately apparent.One field in which we write for example: "The Imago polyphages are able to eat both animal and plant foods.There is also necrophagia larvae feed primarily on underground parts of different plants "(this is for many darkling beetles) or so:" Adults and larvae prey on caterpillars of various Lepidoptera, preferring gypsy moth caterpillars "(specifically for Krasotel fragrant. And so on and so on .P.If monophages - indicates the type of victim / host plant. Varian at the discretion which introduces information. Sam is now inclined to food specialization as the title!

12.01.2016 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is not the "prey" need to write)
More harmonious will read: "Feeding preferences"
And so, the idea is a good Eugene. She, I think, and worth a stop.

12.01.2016 17:36, Peter Khramov:

Did. Shows the number of orders, families, genera (including illustrated) plus a link to the list of species to sample this taxon.

12.01.2016 14:49, Evgeny Komarov:

That would still be certainly very interesting in the future be able to see statistics on supraspecific taxa to units inclusive. I have in mind the following: open / select the detachment / family / genus and can see the number of available online taxa of lower rank - families / genera / species. And at the same time many of them illustrated.How to implement it visually - a lot of variants, but technically, I hope not too difficult?

12.01.2016 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, specifically moved into precise, without label and without images of many species of this genus, there is no 100% certainty.

12.01.2016 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is also probably a mistake. Very similar to Loepa anthera.

12.01.2016 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Probably, all right, except for the "close call." Bo can be closed even after the transfer in precise and yet such confidence, look, no.

12.01.2016 14:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Loepa katinka / Evgeny Komarov Loepa oberthuri / Eugene Matveev.

12.01.2016 7:48, Shamil Murtazin:

This is a very big question - the interaction with the authorities. Eugene, do not accept, please, all our words over personally. The arguments are correct, the motivation is not to be condemned. But I very much doubt the effectiveness of such measures.
Judging by the situation of public utilities, and I "entertain" them have probably 5 years.I think that such actions are correct to begin with a review of the situation in their region. It's close, it is easier (especially if you live in the "capital" of the region). Usually, things are moving in three cases: your thoughts are shared by some deputy or group of deputies of Zack.Meeting the region, your thoughts are shared by a large part of the population of the region, clean your suggestions / level out differences with the federal legislation. 4th added to the investment appeal, but do not think that in this case it will work.Far I urge you not to pursue the matter, just be prepared that your efforts will not be justified. Until zero result.

12.01.2016 6:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my opinion the assumption of Yevgeny Matveyev is right )
For comparison:
Loepa oberthuri (Leech 1890): http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Loepa%20oberthueri.htm
Loepa katinka (Westwood 1848): http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Loepa%20katinka.htm
By habitus the butterfly on this photo is Loepa oberthuri rather than oberthuri ))
If you are agree, it is necessary to edit data and close the conversation.

12.01.2016 2:46, Peter Khramov:

If I understand the author's photo is now the size of already impossible to get ...

12.01.2016 2:29, Eugene Matveev:

I wrote IMHO, because I do not know the formal distinctive features.
For me, the presence of orange spots and black pattern is sufficient.
Besides oberthüri much larger than katinka. We can't estimate the sizi by the photo. It would be nice to specify the size of the butterfly in author's comment.

11.01.2016 20:50, Peter Khramov:

One may need to scream much louder in the effect that the authorities do anything at all or drew attention to this problem at all. On the other hand, if the requirements are very unadequate, then the concern would be relevant. Any opinions?

11.01.2016 18:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Asilidae / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 18:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Asilidae / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 18:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Asilidae / Ivan Pristrem Stenopogon sabaudus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 18:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Asilidae / Ivan Pristrem Stenopogon sabaudus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 16:58, Eugene Davkaev:

Neoitamus ?

11.01.2016 16:56, Eugene Davkaev:

If everybody will be silent, nothing will change.
And, of course, you can come up with a thousand excuses and reasons.

11.01.2016 15:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Oedaleus decorus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamulus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Imago / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamus / Male & female / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Podisma pedestris / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamulus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Oedaleus decorus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Calliptamulus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Thisoicetrinus pterostichus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Podisma pedestris / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Imago / Ivan Pristrem Podisma pedestris / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Imago / Ivan Pristrem Podisma pedestris / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Imago / Ivan Pristrem Podisma pedestris / Male & female / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Podisma pedestris / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Ivan Pristrem Podisma pedestris / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 15:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acridoidea / Imago / Ivan Pristrem Podisma pedestris / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

11.01.2016 14:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The exhibition features about 1500 specimen, about 1100 species.

11.01.2016 14:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This photo is not something that is banal, - banalischscha souvenir))) But this is just a very small part of the exhibition.

11.01.2016 5:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And because not only the tip of the abdomen lapidarius redhead.
You will see a man who on the photo-say exactly fast forward. I just can not.
Then the transfer of undefined to Bombus was inspired here by the news: http://insecta.pro/ru/community/50634

11.01.2016 5:34, Alexander Belousov:

Yes. Just a wall of the house, under a lantern hung UV tube 10 watts.

10.01.2016 21:14, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, this is not always the case, so I write about the work, etc. Pages almost all, but usually check on the home. With such a channel would not be a problem. Still, you know, I often sit Nocera could have got there on the crown of any manipulation performed on the server (or you =)

10.01.2016 20:52, Evgeny Komarov:

That is why. I've got plenty of instances in the collection of the last century, so it is quoting the label. Here I agree with Basil - for the collection of copies must be so.

10.01.2016 20:27, Peter Khramov:

Irina and all bug with gathering of the definitions seem to pochikal. Note that if the problem does not appear again.

10.01.2016 20:25, Nikolay Grebennikov:

and it was caught at the light?

10.01.2016 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Why not lapidarius?

10.01.2016 18:37, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, why do you write in quotes geography? Like, tsitita with labels?

10.01.2016 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Let's wait some more opinions...

10.01.2016 16:20, Peter Khramov:

Is there a sure and nebanal, ph we can still lay. Dima right now with an Internet troubles as poreshat and will go to the site, I think otpishetsya more.

10.01.2016 15:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander, so banal and attract audiences, Special charges do :)

10.01.2016 15:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Two users already for oberthuri - we may move it!

10.01.2016 15:51, Alex Dumchus:

It is pity, there are just few photos. And very common species...

10.01.2016 15:49, Alex Dumchus:

Still, it's more like Loepa oberthuri

10.01.2016 15:44, Evgeny Komarov:

I have it loaded in a second browser on Yandex and Opera.

10.01.2016 15:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, you can see for yourself, my definition uncertain, Eugene IMHO. These types of such photos, so even without georeferencing can not determine with confidence. Therefore, even though so at least you can put some sort. There will be people who will say with confidence, then yes.I myself defined by the photos, reviewing all that I found in the internet, and he went through my copy of the buyer and there is no end. Decide yourself.

10.01.2016 15:30, Peter Khramov:

If you're talking about this page: http://insecta.pro/ru/community, then anything heavy on it there, it must be loaded within a couple of seconds. You have not?

10.01.2016 15:28, Peter Khramov:

Duc, and then smart. The issue, move or not.

10.01.2016 15:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Again, write it "prey." And in this field we have to paint the steps (ie, adults and larvae, if necessary). Just for Lepidoptera larvae is more important, although beetles (weevils in the broadest sense), too, have mono- and oligophages. And parasitic pereponov has developed on one type / kind hosts.Just think there should be, so you do not alter. Probably really "open" for any information field? Not all will be able to provide.

10.01.2016 13:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Hooray! I expected it :) Sometimes it was more convenient to ship the arms one by one, then to simply copy and paste blocks and not to seek any photo where applicable.
Peter! I have increased significantly for the download page. Those. after pressing the button "Forum", for example, prior to the loading of the page directly.Maybe it has something to do with the works or transactions that are made on the server, but it looks like a very serious warning bell.

10.01.2016 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2016 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2016 11:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Nothing clever - I wrote that it is not sure of the definition.

10.01.2016 10:55, Alexander Belousov:

23 mm.

09.01.2016 23:50, Peter Khramov:

Now, new pictures from the archives will be sorted in adequate order (eg, 1.jpg, 2.jpg, 3.jpg, 4.jpg, 5.jpg), and not the chaotic one (for example, 3.jpg, 1.jpg, 5.jpg, 4.jpg, 2.jpg). It's not very a big improvement if you upload several photos at a time, but it is extremely significant if you upload photos by tens and hundreds.
And the download speed of all pages with the latest news, popular insects, etc. in the right block was increased.

09.01.2016 21:26, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny Komarov, what say you about it?

09.01.2016 18:22, Peter Khramov:

Perhaps, instead of fodder plants caterpillars will just infa immature. But in the formalization of already but already detailed. Do you agree?

09.01.2016 14:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Instead of fodder plants caterpillars write "food items", and close all these questions. You can sdelat autosubstitution type "phytophagous", "zoophages", "necrophagia", "saprfag", "coprophagic", "parasite" ... But all is not so simple and unambiguous characteristics most do not we leave this to the free filling field.By the way, with the introduction of the field "length of the body," it would be necessary for the beetles immediately indicate that this parameter is equal to the length from the top of the casing to the top of the elytra! And that can be neponyatki.

09.01.2016 12:02, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, it is among the list of immediate tasks. I will try to make it more swiftly.

08.01.2016 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is time to move the needle :)
Regarding Coleoptera:
1) It's necessary to add body length to formalized characteristics.
2) The word "Caterpillar" is to be raplaced to "Larva" — if it's not done yet. The only thing worth thinking about is how to replace the word "plants" in the "Food plants" field.
3) Similar to the fields "Pupa" and "Egg" we need to add the field "Larva" in order to make it where to write the description of habitus.
I've experimented with one species: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/163282

08.01.2016 0:17, Eugene Matveev:

IMHO - Loepa oberthuri

07.01.2016 23:56, Peter Khramov:

Uh-huh, thanks for the tip, corrected.

07.01.2016 21:48, Shamil Murtazin:

On the right menu, where "Directory" is written. Links, http://store.insecta.pro/catalog/s20, for example.

07.01.2016 21:44, Peter Khramov:

From the catalog - do you mean /catalog, not the goods page?

07.01.2016 21:40, Peter Khramov:

I was there already!)

07.01.2016 21:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Interesting data. At the end of this year on the plateau go =)
More probably, there is some seasonal periodicity.

07.01.2016 21:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Eh! I'd like to see it =) What is the audience?

07.01.2016 21:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! The store, which is on the insects (the official did not check) when linking from the catalog - you get to the site of non-Russian. (probably not add "/ ru /" in the address bar).
Same parsley, if you search for something in the search - the results already displayed on the English site, too, there is no / ru / in the address.

07.01.2016 21:25, Peter Khramov:

So let's reflect on our progress:

Photos and users comments on the site through the years


We've opened up in September, 2007. The data must be acknowledged as for the end of the period: 2008 means December 31, 2008 and 2015 — December 31, 2015.


Photos and users comments on the site through 2015


We've moved from Lepidoptera to Insecta in September, 2015. The data must be acknowledged as for the end of the period: January means January 31 and December means December 31.

07.01.2016 19:15, Peter Khramov:

Before synonyms and subspecies left two relatively large tasks to complete. I hope one of them today doleplyu.

07.01.2016 19:10, Peter Khramov:

Now we are not about butterflies and moths only, but about other insects on Tweeter too. Welcome: https://twitter.com/Insecta_pro

07.01.2016 16:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, what we've got with editing / adding subspecies? And synonyms from supraspecific taxa? Well it is very necessary to have! As for the right to replace the pictures thank you wait.

07.01.2016 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Shamil Murtazin naichinaet engaged in the processing and downloading pictures on the website of third-party authors - ie those who agreed to publish their work on the site, but to do it while he can.

07.01.2016 16:11, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry Pozhogin opened an exhibition of butterflies and moths. If you will be in Nizhny Novgorod don't hesitate to come and visit us :--)
For more information see exhibition page at our website (in Russian): http://insecta.pro/projects/2.

07.01.2016 16:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia Cucullia lucifuga.

07.01.2016 16:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia Cucullia lucifuga.

07.01.2016 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Irina Nikulina Lacanobia contigua / Oleg Pekarsky.

07.01.2016 15:40, Oleg Pekarsky:

Lacanobia contigua

07.01.2016 15:37, Oleg Pekarsky:

lucifuga

07.01.2016 13:24, Peter Khramov:

Ok, prepare your foty and I just completed yet updated mechanism replacing ph and make you right.

06.01.2016 18:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter looked at a couple of other computers on the website photos - alas, you're right, obviously overexposure. Who will monitor your right to do good work, give the right to replace images without asking you.

06.01.2016 18:09, Peter Khramov:

Look histogram clearly overexposure, even with the white background. And compared to the earlier tovimi collectors or natural. Strange.

06.01.2016 14:11, Shamil Murtazin:

Just like pterophoridae looks =)

06.01.2016 13:21, Evgeny Komarov:

In my opinion, these "mass appeal" simply do not work, and secondly, all the tougher regime in our reserves run it on the "small fry" - it's easier and safer, and to report on the "adherence" is easy. Therefore, to a large extent I agree with Shamil.And repeatedly stated - not brutality, and the certainty of punishment should be. But the resources for such guard at nature reserves simply do not have, and who are in the protection, still a big question. I do not want bad things about all the huntsman, but ...

06.01.2016 12:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Initially always distanced itself from such "populist-looking" petitions.
Because omit the question of how effective such a measure as a public mass conversion. Immediately proceed directly to the text.Just write "Krupnyakov" what caught my eyes:
- 50 years in prison - that is a lot, even in the Criminal Code (can that not so, correct if that) no more than 35 ... or life.
- Poaching is different! Then the tiger, and then a roach with boats in spawning ...
- "It is necessary to strengthen the protection of nature reserves," and how to do it - there are no offers.The proposal is not even a problem: from whom to protect what kind of PAs to protect. Because the PA have a lot of ... not so many resources.
- At the rangers and foresters already have the right to detain offenders. Only now are many legal holes, plus the guns have poachers.
etc.
I apologize for taking the time to read my commentary =)

06.01.2016 12:27, Peter Khramov:

Citizens discuss-let. Interestingly your opinion on this matter.

06.01.2016 5:40, Eugene Davkaev:

https://www.change.org/p/%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%B7%D0%B0-%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD%D1%8C%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE-%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%8C-%D1%81%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BA-%D0%BE%D1%82-20-30-%D0%B4%D0%BE-50-%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82-%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%8B?tk=clz5Q4yESoweRbKgIuaMWLK9d-gvIvqFgCqZSCwHCZQ&utm_source=supporter_signature_milestone_email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=supporter_signatures_1000&utm_term=supporter_signature_milestone_email

06.01.2016 0:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Thank you, Basil! Duck thought it was him but himself, and did not give anyone :) It's a long time ago it is necessary - as the old size images are barely make out ... And slowly retake collection, including and the fact that the previously laid out as in no.

05.01.2016 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, a little advice :)
Discuss with Peter that he'll share the independent replacement of photos in your lux.
Not the first year of this business benefit and there is simply no need to refer to Peter with similar questions :)

05.01.2016 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Lasius fuji / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Zryanin.

05.01.2016 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica / Vladimir Zryanin.

05.01.2016 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica / Vladimir Zryanin.

05.01.2016 20:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, there seems to be no way. I look at his monitor the site - everything is OK. Not a bit lighter than the others'.

05.01.2016 20:45, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, and you foty in this series are not overexposed?

05.01.2016 20:23, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, if it is possible to precisely defined transfer - reported.

05.01.2016 20:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Confidently identified Camponotus sachalinensis / Tentatively identified.

05.01.2016 20:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Lasius fuji / Vladimir Zryanin.

05.01.2016 20:21, Peter Khramov:

The inaccurate yaponikusy send?

05.01.2016 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Do not remove, one must be replaced. Replace.

05.01.2016 9:44, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. pseudoplatessa Gottwald, 1982

05.01.2016 9:44, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. pseudoplatessa Gottwald, 1982

05.01.2016 0:43, Igor Ivannikov:

This image can be deleted.

04.01.2016 22:55, Vladimir Zryanin:

It's either Camponotus japonicus (more likely), or C. saxatilis

04.01.2016 22:51, Vladimir Zryanin:

Same Lasius fuji

04.01.2016 22:50, Vladimir Zryanin:

With a high probability it is working Lasius (Dendrolasius) fuji Radchenko, 2005

04.01.2016 22:43, Vladimir Zryanin:

Formica s. str.

04.01.2016 22:42, Vladimir Zryanin:

Formica s. str.

04.01.2016 22:39, Vladimir Zryanin:

Yes, it is most likely a female Camponotus sachalinensis

04.01.2016 18:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Meant here is http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46219

04.01.2016 18:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, this is daring photos, there is already laid out for the replacement of better quality!

04.01.2016 2:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.01.2016 2:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.01.2016 22:21, Igor Ivannikov:

Instead of 50733 photos.

03.01.2016 22:13, Igor Ivannikov:

Bad photo. Butterfly is not white, and pale yellow. Wait Try replacing.

03.01.2016 19:09, Alex Dumchus:

Something I had not seen Leucippe with white rear and front part of the orange, in my opinion it glaucippe

02.01.2016 11:23, Alexander Belousov:

By definition, Gorbunov, Pyrgus armoricanus not present in Kazakhstan, and the copies. It refers toPyrgus serratulae. I think the photos can be transferred.

02.01.2016 11:20, Alexander Belousov:

This female of Balkhash Pavel Gorbunov redefined asChazara persephone. The key to determining served bright white veins on the underside of the rear wings. We copies. meeting in the mountains, colorful veins. Please check and transfer photos.

01.01.2016 23:12, Peter Khramov:

Join us!

01.01.2016 23:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Tephritis Tephritis hyoscyami.

01.01.2016 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C New Year !!!
I wish everyone in the new, 2016 schvstya, kindness and good luck in all your undertakings)))

31.12.2015 22:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Congratulations to all colleagues and guests site Happy New Year! Health, happiness, success, interesting trips and discoveries, new images and all desired!

31.12.2015 21:30, Alexander Belousov:

C New Year from Kazakhstan! Zhana Zhyldaryңyzben! Let this year be peaceful! All the best!!!

31.12.2015 14:20, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Yura! Join all desires, all good and happy new year !! You have it very soon will come, and, as always, together with you, and raise a glass for new meetings on your distant and generous land of miracles! :))

31.12.2015 12:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yeah, so like everywhere, flying day

31.12.2015 10:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Congratulations to the authors and guest Insecta a Happy New Year and Merry Christmas! Let the new year will be plenty of new pictures and professionals of new scientific discoveries and findings! Happiness, love, health and prosperity to all!

30.12.2015 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pimpla / Confidently identified / Marina Yolkina Lissonota lineolaris / Tentatively identified / Andrei Humala.

30.12.2015 21:34, Andrei Humala:

It is not Pimpla, it Lissonota, most likely, lineolaris (Gmelin, 1790) - S / Sem. Banchinae

30.12.2015 19:24, Alex Dumchus:

Caught Memnonov evening, 4-5 pm, landed on the sheet.
Born in YuVAzii (Vietnam, Thailand), I did not catch virtually anything. And here in the Dominican Republic))) Sea hawk moths

30.12.2015 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Alex Lender Herminia tarsicrinalis / Irina Nikulina.

30.12.2015 10:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, it's not a single glitch (doubles). If the same taxon is different subgenus of the same kind (and it often takes place, at least in the Harpalus), then the transfer of the place doubles formed as described above. Now I have them right to unite, in order not to produce problems.Leaving only doubles from the previous commentaries on the "see" you.

30.12.2015 8:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, look at it here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/292034 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/958024. As two identical names "get along" in the database? I transferred to the subgenus Glanodes "homeless" look and found identical in everything except the field "Full Name". We were standing there kind of subgenus not established for some reason.
And we need to communicate during the holidays, if you find the time (it would be better for Skype).Questions accumulated sea, and then paint the irrational.
One still ask: What do we have synonyms for supraspecific taxa and the right to edit all the synonyms for curators?

30.12.2015 5:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cleridae Trichodes apiarius.

30.12.2015 5:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Glaphyridae Pygopleurus vulpes.

30.12.2015 2:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Alex Lender Axylia putris / Irina Nikulina.

30.12.2015 2:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Alex Lender Clostera anastomosis / Male / Irina Nikulina.

30.12.2015 2:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Notodontidae / Alex Lender Notodonta dromedarius / Irina Nikulina.

30.12.2015 0:51, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Alex Lender Triodia sylvina / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2015 23:34, Irina Nikulina:

Notodonta dromedarius

29.12.2015 23:31, Irina Nikulina:

Triodia sylvina

29.12.2015 23:29, Irina Nikulina:

Herminia tarsicrinalis

29.12.2015 23:27, Irina Nikulina:

Clostera anastomosis

29.12.2015 23:25, Irina Nikulina:

Axylia putris

29.12.2015 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.12.2015 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pygopleurus vulpes?

29.12.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaphyridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.12.2015 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Trichodes apiariusappear.

29.12.2015 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.12.2015 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hydraecia Hydraecia ultima.

29.12.2015 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hydraecia Hydraecia ultima.

29.12.2015 20:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Crambidae / Alex Lender Scoparia / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2015 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Alex Lender Hydriomena impluviata / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2015 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2015 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Alex Lender Schiffermuelleria schaefferella / .

29.12.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Alex Lender Cosmorhoe ocellata / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Alex Lender Pelurga comitata / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2015 18:26, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkSchiffermuelleria schaefferella

29.12.2015 18:23, Irina Nikulina:

Scoparia pyralella?

29.12.2015 18:21, Irina Nikulina:

Cosmorhoe ocellata

29.12.2015 18:20, Irina Nikulina:

Hydriomena impluviata?

29.12.2015 18:18, Irina Nikulina:

Pelurga comitata

29.12.2015 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Alexander, so much clearer. Now and in the second image is desired to change the comment. The first image of the form on the network, will be watching experts. :)))

29.12.2015 6:36, Alexander Belousov:

Sorry for the confusion, he is guilty. After the assumption of Basil More photos sent to other specialists. With accurate opredelnie first was Alex, because of his and pointed. Now have all decide who "won." Thank you all for your help and explanations.

28.12.2015 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, I do not understand the course of your actions and determining the authorship of this kind. Today, you have posted photos on the definition of this type with the assumption that a different kind of a different subfamily.Two hours later, Vasily Sergienko, in his very careful manner definition of a species included gender and the most likely kind, explaining his cautious, not knowing a number of species which are at you but he does not know them. Two hours later confirmed his determination Balázs Benedek.You comments, listed only one has defined Alex Matt, and Balázs Benedek and Oleg Baking confirmed definition. This statement, in my opinion it is not true that in order to confirm, it is necessary to know the definition that made Alex mats. If the determination is made on their own, it is also a definition.And much of the defining Sergienko gone? From what can be seen in mobiole. The definition did Vasily Sergienko and confirmed, and possibly also identified Balázs Benedek. About the definition of other authors if you send them pictures, they too are really determined.If the definition of it in the photo mobiole after determining Sergienko and Balázs, then it is proof definition :). You put your interesting views of all four are defined in an awkward position. :))

28.12.2015 13:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tachina grossa / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

28.12.2015 12:30, Yuri Semejkin:

It Was Peter! When loading, and therefore asked. Okay, I'm shooting for the new date entered.

28.12.2015 10:44, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, it was when you download or later it put down?

27.12.2015 16:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.12.2015 16:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Where the date of the shooting go?

27.12.2015 11:41, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Eugene! I knew immediately about any shot you write because it including focused assuming here vietinghoffi)) Well, that everything is now on the right places)

27.12.2015 11:28, Evgeny Komarov:

In the photo is very easy to confuse C. hummeli and C.vietinghoffi. What I did uschpeshno with its own image.

27.12.2015 11:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.12.2015 11:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.12.2015 11:25, Evgeny Komarov:

By location it's hummeli smaragdulus Kraatz, 1878. It is a volatile form of color. Analyzing these images, his own mistake in previously laid out photos found.

27.12.2015 11:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.12.2015 11:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

27.12.2015 11:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Imago Carabus hummeli / Male.

27.12.2015 11:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.12.2015 11:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus Carabus hummeli.

27.12.2015 11:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Irina Nikulina Carabus hummeli / Evgeny Komarov.

27.12.2015 11:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus / Irina Nikulina Carabus hummeli / Evgeny Komarov.

27.12.2015 11:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Evgeny Komarov.

27.12.2015 11:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus Carabus hummeli.

27.12.2015 11:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus Carabus hummeli.

27.12.2015 11:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabus vietinghoffi Carabus hummeli.

27.12.2015 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Irina, thank you to pay attention. Experiment, check ...

27.12.2015 0:27, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, you asked for time to catch fly away definitions here today observing. Within 10 minutes after the transfer to the 3 types of pictures I linked to the group LK completely different photo from the set today with those three. Luke all photos were already in place to the species are present. Contact, updated - and then flew these 3 photos.Vasily them back into place after 10 minutes One of them changed the adults of the female (not at once) - and again flew down the definition, but this time only in this photo. Edit soon after the setting - and the flies (

27.12.2015 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus Monochamus urussovi.

27.12.2015 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus / Imago Monochamus urussovi / Female.

27.12.2015 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus Monochamus urussovi.

26.12.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prismognathus subaeneus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.12.2015 23:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus Monochamus urussovi.

26.12.2015 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Monochamus / Imago Monochamus urussovi / Female.

26.12.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prismognathus subaeneus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.12.2015 22:31, Irina Nikulina:

Carabus vietinghoffi? (Eugene, still dare to make three assumptions loved you Carabus), do not be surprised if erroneous, photo Complicated)

26.12.2015 22:28, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps, too, a subspecies Carabus hummeli? (biamensis?)

26.12.2015 22:25, Irina Nikulina:

Guess Carabus (Morphocarabus) hummeli smaragdulus

26.12.2015 22:13, Irina Nikulina:

Monochamus urussoviifemale?

26.12.2015 22:12, Irina Nikulina:

Monochamus urussovii?

26.12.2015 22:07, Irina Nikulina:

Prismognathus subaeneus Motschulsky, 1860

26.12.2015 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae Chrysolina difficilis.

26.12.2015 15:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Perhaps born Hedychrum.

26.12.2015 14:21, Evgeny Komarov:

This does not Hedychrum nobile: http://www.chrysis.net/database/chr_scheda.php?rif=Hedychrum_nobile. Most likely another kind. It should be moved to Chrysididae.

26.12.2015 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.12.2015 11:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Necrobia violacea / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Hurry, though :)

26.12.2015 11:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dasytes niger Necrobia violacea.

26.12.2015 11:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dasytes niger / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthocomus equestris / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Anthocomus equestris / Confidently identified / Male & female / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichodes apiarius / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichodes apiarius / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pygopleurus vulpes / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.12.2015 11:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pygopleurus vulpes / Confidently identified / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pygopleurus vulpes / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dasytes niger / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 11:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dasytes niger / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 9:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pygopleurus vulpes / Confidently identified / Male & female / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 9:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pygopleurus vulpes / Confidently identified / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 9:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pygopleurus vulpes / Confidently identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 9:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pygopleurus vulpes / Confidently identified / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

26.12.2015 1:35, Peter Khramov:

Gluck was time for the family, and endured ...

25.12.2015 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In fact determined to kind (see. Comments) :)

25.12.2015 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cricotopus / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

25.12.2015 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gallerucida bifasciata.

25.12.2015 17:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

25.12.2015 17:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Agelastica coerulea.

25.12.2015 15:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Agelastica coerulea Baly, 1874

25.12.2015 15:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Galerucida bifasciata Motsch.

25.12.2015 13:33, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I have written this problem, Basil.

25.12.2015 13:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Basil Sergienko.

25.12.2015 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

25.12.2015 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, then, of course killed my question from 14.12.2015 1:23 (essentially technical) ....
Why, after the removal of synonyms doubles comment (at best)?
THOSE. obtained by one act is not one comment, but several (
It should not be (types of pages are filled with unnecessary doubles of comments).
It is not good and it is necessary rvazbiratsya.

25.12.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Scopula ternata / Basil Sergienko.

25.12.2015 11:04, Basil Sergienko:

Scopula ternata

25.12.2015 5:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Clytini / Irina Nikulina Anaglyptus colobotheoides / Evgeny Komarov.

24.12.2015 20:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Irina Nikulina Gastrolina depressa / Evgeny Komarov.

24.12.2015 20:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Evgeny Komarov.

24.12.2015 20:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae Chrysochus chinensis.

24.12.2015 20:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Irina Nikulina Chrysochus chinensis / Evgeny Komarov.

24.12.2015 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clytraxeloma cyanipennis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.12.2015 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clytraxeloma cyanipennis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.12.2015 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clytraxeloma cyanipennis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.12.2015 19:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae Agelasa nigriceps.

24.12.2015 19:06, Irina Nikulina:

Clytraxeloma cyanipennis Kraatz, 1879 (Megalopodidae) http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/clycyakm.htm
Not found on the site

24.12.2015 19:01, Irina Nikulina:

Agelasa nigriceps

24.12.2015 19:01, Irina Nikulina:

Agelasa nigriceps

24.12.2015 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

Agelasa nigriceps

24.12.2015 18:59, Irina Nikulina:

Agelasa nigriceps Motschulsky, 1861 (Galerucinae)
http://www.naris.go.kr/v2/naris_search/search_result_detail.jsp?sno=S&inst_id=1295168
http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/agenigms.htm
The site was not found

24.12.2015 18:57, Alexander Belousov:

40 mm

24.12.2015 18:57, Alexander Belousov:

36 mm

24.12.2015 18:56, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Chrysolina difficilis&

24.12.2015 18:56, Irina Nikulina:

Eumolpinae sp. ? Perhaps,Chrysochus asclepiadeus?

24.12.2015 17:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cyphocrania gigas Linnaeus, 1758 Here is a synonym in the species to which I have now suffered.
This is closer to the truth (especially in geography). So now let's leave that.

24.12.2015 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Achrioptera fallax Phasma gigas.

24.12.2015 7:51, Tatiana Selena:

Giant Indonesian living stick (Cyphocraniu gigas) like it here, I did not find the same phasmatodea.

24.12.2015 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Most likely a different look.
Achrioptera fallax - endemic to northern Madagascar and Indonesia, has nothing to do (if you do not deliver, of course).
And in appearance, there are significant differences: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achrioptera_fallax
Let stand up here is to determine the exact species.

24.12.2015 6:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.12.2015 5:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put until inaccurate.

24.12.2015 5:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Confidently identified Lixus maculatus / Tentatively identified.

24.12.2015 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Epicauta flabellicornis Epicauta sibirica.

24.12.2015 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Epicauta flabellicornis Epicauta sibirica.

24.12.2015 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Epicauta sibirica Pallas, 1777 - another kind: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id164939/
I do taxon and bear it because Epicauta flabellicornis purely European species and the Far East for it is not specified in the spread: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id239085/
For a more detailed distribution of Epicauta flabellicornis can be found here: http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=123799

23.12.2015 22:52, Irina Nikulina:

Some sourcesEpicauta sibiricahttp://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/episibsk.htm http://eol.org/pages/3272096/overview

23.12.2015 20:57, Irina Nikulina:

Lixus (Dilixellus) maculatus, likely http://chigaku.ed.gifu-u.ac.jp/chigakuhp/html/kyo/SEIBUTSU/doubutsu/09kochu/zoumushi/aino/index.html http: //tokyoinsects.web .fc2.com / coleoptera / ainokatuozoumushi.html The site was not found. There are only Acopturus maculatus

23.12.2015 20:53, Irina Nikulina:

I GuessPtochidius tesselatushttp://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/cypteskm.htm where he apparently,Brachyrhinus tesselatus

23.12.2015 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

23.12.2015 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

23.12.2015 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ivan Pristrem.

23.12.2015 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago / Ivan Pristrem Larva / .

23.12.2015 5:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, where a glitch with the disappearance of geography to redefine, no idea! Like field geography has touched.

22.12.2015 22:42, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, write in the system area where this bug ...

22.12.2015 22:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

22.12.2015 22:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Eugene, flew to redefine the geography. Completely.

22.12.2015 20:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dermestes laniarius / Ivan Pristrem Dermestes undulatus / Evgeny Komarov.

22.12.2015 11:32, Shamil Murtazin:

OK I understood. =)

22.12.2015 9:01, Evgeny Komarov:

There are enough "old" 70's of the last century determinant larvae Coccinellidae, but to determine the photo ... It is unlikely, especially Scymnus & Co.

22.12.2015 8:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Eugene! A predimagialnye stage can somehow identify? For example here is: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43152
Thanks in advance =)

21.12.2015 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Shamil said into the phone. If you have any more questions - ask.

21.12.2015 13:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 13:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 13:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 13:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida stigmatica / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida vibex / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida nebulosa / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 11:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Hypocassida subferruginea / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 10:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida stigmatica / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 10:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida vibex / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 10:55, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, write about the Old Gymnopleurus on the same page where the comment Basil. Then the question becomes clearer.

21.12.2015 10:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

21.12.2015 9:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera Phalacridae.

21.12.2015 9:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Scymnus apetzi / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 9:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Scymnus apetzi / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 9:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Ivan Pristrem Exochomus octosignatus / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 9:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Scymnus frontalis / Ivan Pristrem Platynaspis luteorubra / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I plan to buy "tent" by February 2016. If they are not very much - Book me one. While I can only make some money, not completely. Thanks in advance.

21.12.2015 8:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Ivan Pristrem Coleoptera / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Scymnus haemorrhoidalis / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinella / Ivan Pristrem Coccinella septempunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Ivan Pristrem Halyzia sedecimguttata / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinella / Ivan Pristrem Coccinella septempunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinella / Ivan Pristrem Coccinella septempunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinella / Ivan Pristrem Coccinella septempunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinella / Ivan Pristrem Coccinella septempunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 8:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinella / Ivan Pristrem Coccinella septempunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinella / Ivan Pristrem Coccinella septempunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Colaphus / Imago Colaphus sophiae hoefti / Male & female.

21.12.2015 7:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Eumolpus / Ivan Pristrem Chrysochus asclepiadeus / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Colaphus / Ivan Pristrem Colaphus sophiae hoefti / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Colaphus / Ivan Pristrem Colaphus sophiae hoefti / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Ivan Pristrem Cryptocephalus flavipes / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Colaphus sophiae Colaphus sophiae hoefti.

21.12.2015 7:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Colaphus / Ivan Pristrem Colaphus sophiae / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Ivan Pristrem Cryptocephalus bipunctatus / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

21.12.2015 7:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelinae / Ivan Pristrem Chrysolina sanguinolenta / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelinae / Ivan Pristrem Chrysolina sanguinolenta / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Ivan Pristrem Clytra laeviuscula / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelinae Chrysolina sanguinolenta.

21.12.2015 7:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelinae / Ivan Pristrem Chrysolina sanguinolenta / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Labidostomis / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Labidostomis longimana / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Ivan Pristrem Galerucella tenella / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Labidostomis / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Labidostomis lucida / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 7:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Ivan Pristrem Galerucella tenella / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 6:52, Evgeny Komarov:

To accurately determine the need to see the front head (casing and upper lip).

21.12.2015 6:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Labidostomis / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Labidostomis beckeri / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 6:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Luperus xanthopoda / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 6:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida nobilis / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 6:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida nobilis / Evgeny Komarov.

21.12.2015 6:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cassidinae / Ivan Pristrem Cassida nobilis / Evgeny Komarov.

20.12.2015 18:47, Alexander Belousov:

Does anyone recognize "the beast"?

20.12.2015 18:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Larva

20.12.2015 18:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Larva

20.12.2015 18:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Why imago? It is Coccinellidae pupa.

20.12.2015 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.12.2015 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It comments on the page, photos, expressing a personal opinion, and that's all.
I did not enter it in the description of taxa :) That's where it was, would be inadmissible (
Topic of conversation can be closed) There is something not clear it.

19.12.2015 11:27, Irina Nikulina:

Identified by Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

19.12.2015 9:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, I'm just about the fact that did not happen, so that the "only bronzovok." This is the "misleading" Read comments;)

19.12.2015 9:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.12.2015 22:24, Vassiliy Zakharchenko:



It looks like brushes for antennas. On both front legs (males and females).

18.12.2015 20:48, Peter Khramov:

Basil, removed.

18.12.2015 20:33, Irina Nikulina:

This 28-spot Ladybird potato, native entomofauna views Far East, over the summer gives 2 generation and deals in Primorye very considerable damage to potato and not only him - cucumber, zucchini, eggplant, tomatoes, peppers absorbs as successfully throughout the growing season.In August 11d watched the invasion of ladybugs on private gardens in Shkotovsky District, an impressive sight - almost one skeletonized leaves, especially on cucumbers and courgettes (

18.12.2015 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, do not go there I have it hopped: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/979677
Take away or combine it with the benefit of the tribe Dicercini Dicercini.
Psilopterini is its synonym: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id9082/
I myself can not do this.

18.12.2015 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What about gimnoplevrov I did not know, frankly. And in Moscow they do not have to watch yourself (
But the example is a long bronzovok shown in popular literature;
"Most of the species bronzovok edge elytra are so arranged that when flying they do not need to disclose.
Fly as long and as easily as any other beetle "

VJStanek "The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Insects" © 1977 publishing Artiya Prague.
And he is constantly watching them.
That's why - that their example and showed :)

18.12.2015 12:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Y. G. Arzanov by photo.

18.12.2015 12:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Epimeces Lixus cardui.

18.12.2015 12:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination was confirmed by Y. G. Arzanov.

18.12.2015 12:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.12.2015 12:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Determination Y. G. Arzanov by photo.

18.12.2015 12:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Hypera / Irina Nikulina Hypera miles / Evgeny Komarov.

18.12.2015 11:48, Irina Nikulina:

With Coccinella septempunctata and Formicidae sp. (perhaps, Formica fusca)

18.12.2015 9:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! Here in your comments http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43848 says: "This image shows the main difference between this bronzovok from all the other bugs .Chafer can fly without revealing the elytra, but in order to be able to fly like them and the edges of the elytra arranged special, different from other beetles way by which they "know how" to produce the wings between the elytra and abdomen. "But! Just arranged wings and Gymnopleurus (not to be unfounded: http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=27893).

18.12.2015 0:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.12.2015 20:59, Peter Khramov:

Illustration removed.

17.12.2015 19:59, Irina Nikulina:

Hydrochara flavipes?

17.12.2015 11:10, Irina Nikulina:

No, Eugene, is a rose barbed or bedrentsovolistnaya (R. spinosissima), a great-flowering bush and every flower in June is such a feast), midway is not visible)

17.12.2015 9:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Irina Nikulina Sciaphobus squalidus / Evgeny Komarov.

17.12.2015 9:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.12.2015 9:29, Evgeny Komarov:

The peony flower?

17.12.2015 9:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Byturidae / Irina Nikulina Orsodacne cerasi / Evgeny Komarov.

17.12.2015 9:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Byturidae / Irina Nikulina Orsodacne cerasi / Evgeny Komarov.

17.12.2015 9:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis Cantharis livida.

17.12.2015 9:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis Cantharis rustica.

17.12.2015 9:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis Cantharis fusca.

17.12.2015 9:17, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis Cantharis fusca.

17.12.2015 9:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis Cantharis nigricans.

17.12.2015 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.12.2015 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.12.2015 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Aeshna crenata / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.12.2015 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Aeshna / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.12.2015 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Coenagrion / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.12.2015 0:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Lestes sponsa / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.12.2015 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Sympetrum baccha / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

17.12.2015 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Sympetrum baccha / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

16.12.2015 23:47, Irina Nikulina:

Cantharis fusca?

16.12.2015 23:45, Irina Nikulina:

Cantharis rustica?

16.12.2015 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Sympetrum depressiusculum / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

16.12.2015 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Cantharis fusca?

16.12.2015 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Sympetrum depressiusculum / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

16.12.2015 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Cantharis livida?

16.12.2015 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Sympetrum depressiusculum / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

16.12.2015 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Cantharis nigricans?

16.12.2015 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Sympetrum infuscatum / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

16.12.2015 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

16.12.2015 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Yuri Semejkin Sympetrum / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

16.12.2015 22:45, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not exactly!

16.12.2015 22:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum sp.

16.12.2015 22:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum ?infuscatum, female

16.12.2015 22:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum depressiusculum, male

16.12.2015 22:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum ?baccha, female

16.12.2015 22:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum baccha, male

16.12.2015 22:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Lestes sponsa, female

16.12.2015 22:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Coenagrion sp. female

16.12.2015 22:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aeshna sp., female

16.12.2015 22:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aeshna ?crenata, female

16.12.2015 21:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae / Irina Nikulina Sciaphobus squalidus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalinae / Ivan Pristrem Pachybrachis fimbriolatus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:23, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2015 16:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalinae / Ivan Pristrem Pachybrachis fimbriolatus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalinae / Ivan Pristrem Pachybrachis fimbriolatus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalinae / Ivan Pristrem Pachybrachis fimbriolatus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Ivan Pristrem Cryptocephalus anticus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:18, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2015 16:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Ivan Pristrem Cryptocephalus anticus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Why Cryptocephalinae ??? And imago? I do not understand what it is at all.

16.12.2015 16:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.12.2015 16:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Ivan Pristrem Cryptocephalus cordiger / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Ivan Pristrem Cryptocephalus cordiger / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Ivan Pristrem Cryptocephalus cordiger / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Finely, Irina, but it is sericeus rather.

16.12.2015 16:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Cryptocephalus sericeus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 16:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Irina Nikulina Cryptocephalus sericeus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 15:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Gonioctena / Confidently identified Gonioctena viminalis / Tentatively identified.

16.12.2015 15:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae Gonioctena.

16.12.2015 15:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Phyllobius / Irina Nikulina Phyllobius pyri / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 15:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae Otiorhynchus ligustici.

16.12.2015 15:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae Otiorhynchus ligustici.

16.12.2015 15:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Curculionidae Otiorhynchus ligustici.

16.12.2015 15:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Rhynchitina / Irina Nikulina Tatianaerhynchites aequatus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.12.2015 15:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, Irina! It's O. ligustici indeed.

16.12.2015 1:20, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllobius pomaceus?

16.12.2015 1:10, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllobius urticae?

16.12.2015 1:07, Irina Nikulina:

Otiorhynchus ligustici?

15.12.2015 23:13, Irina Nikulina:

Gonioctena viminalis?

15.12.2015 22:23, Peter Khramov:

Too long the list is. Rather, it will be only the common field. So, there will be little, but they can make any type of data that can only come to mind.
As for "quite possible" - Ivan, the technical capability and practical implementation may be very far from each other ...I think, first try to join fields, and discuss the results of the first.
As for the formal features - here is a list of them for the different groups should be different. By the way, you can discuss the same topic.

15.12.2015 20:18, Ivan Pristrem:

With regard to the fields. It seems to me that, at least for each unit specific set of fields is done. Because that's a list of fields can be too long.And then, it is the only convenient way to represent the fields in the event of further expansion of the site of specialization, for example, to the type of Arthropoda (this option is quite possible in the future).

15.12.2015 13:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Beautiful animals.

15.12.2015 10:51, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Sasha, corrected. Apparently, the machine has turned out, was the previous 01 underside.

15.12.2015 10:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

For this picture indicates that it is the bottom (though I do not see it, but the photo gallery provides among the bottom :)), it is desirable to correct.

15.12.2015 0:35, Irina Nikulina:

Peter is an illustration of the need to remove the subgenus http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/955904. Transferred to others. Subgenus, and I did not remove mogu- replace me nothing. I am writing here, I do not want to clutter up the page type tehn. requests)

14.12.2015 23:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sitochroa verticalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.12.2015 23:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! I'm sorry. I'll call you back tomorrow.

14.12.2015 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil is something new "fuflovy synonym for" and "valid synonym for" , here on the site under the synonyms It refers to a much broader concept than just a synonym for (name of a particular type, another author at a later time) here and generic combinations and spelling mistakes, which are found on the websites and in the literature,and the name under which the type in the literature and the various spellings of the author .. We must be very careful to clean and only if there are duplicates of synonyms. Tragedy Of course not, but being able to find someone kind that it leads to wrong, will not succeed.:)
Yes, Basil, I saw that you removed, I do not know, I do not know, I think you are mistaken.

14.12.2015 15:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How have you caught it? Night light or during the day?

14.12.2015 11:45, Irina Nikulina:

Sitochroa verticalis

14.12.2015 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Alex Dumchus Peridrome subfascia / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.12.2015 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Alex Dumchus Peridrome subfascia / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.12.2015 11:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Alex Dumchus Episteme maculatrix / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.12.2015 11:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Alex Dumchus Episteme maculatrix / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.12.2015 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Peridrome orbicularis / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.12.2015 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Peridrome orbicularis / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.12.2015 2:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Episteme maculatrix

14.12.2015 1:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter and another such moment.
Just now working with this: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/157445
And from thence fuflovye synonyms (previously hammered a complete list of valid). Removes one fell swoop, once put the necessary jackdaws and click.
Look how many there are of comments received (((
After one action should have one comment, not a lot.Please see what's what, and why is it better. And then it turns out quite a disgrace (

14.12.2015 0:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who else could it be besides?
Dmitry, so they kind of just two types. And the second (Peridrome subfascia) male does not look:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/03_AGANAINAE/02_Peridrome/Peridrome_subfascia/Peridrome_subfascia.htm
In my opinion it is too malePeridrome orbicularisis :)

13.12.2015 23:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I will write about it tomorrow. There are serious shoals (((

13.12.2015 21:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Pseudovadonia livida / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 21:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Pseudovadonia livida / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 21:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Pseudovadonia livida / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 21:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Pseudovadonia livida / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 21:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Pseudovadonia livida / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 21:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Pseudovadonia livida / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 21:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.12.2015 21:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.12.2015 21:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

13.12.2015 21:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anoplistes / Ivan Pristrem Purpuricenus kaehleri / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 21:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

13.12.2015 21:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.12.2015 21:30, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.12.2015 21:16, Peter Khramov:

Confirm twenty-one frames...

13.12.2015 11:42, Evgeny Komarov:

The same here, Irina! When I first saw Brahmea near the lamp, the impression it was ... !!!

13.12.2015 11:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Agapanthia / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthia villosoviridescens / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:30, Irina Nikulina:

Of all met for the first time last trip to Primorye butterflies Brahmea tankre produced perhaps the most impressive! Extraordinarily beautiful butterfly, so that's velvety night "bird" with a wingspan of up to 13 cm.I can not say that there were a lot, but even when the 3-4 come together - an unforgettable sight! A caterpillar in her very funny) Here, if you're interested, you can see the full cycle of conversion of Brahma http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmL8jefOd5A

13.12.2015 11:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Imago / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthiola leucaspis / Male & female / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Agapanthia / Ivan Pristrem Phytoecia nigricornis / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Theophilea cylindricollis / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthiola leucaspis / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Agapanthia / Ivan Pristrem Phytoecia nigricornis / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthia violacea / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthiola leucaspis / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Phytoecia virgula / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Agapanthia / Ivan Pristrem Phytoecia nigricornis / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 11:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Agapanthia / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthia maculicornis / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 10:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Agapanthia / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthia dahli / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 10:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Theophilea cylindricollis / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 10:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthia violacea / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 10:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Agapanthia violacea / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 5:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sialidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Sialis / Senya Grigorenko.

13.12.2015 5:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemerobiidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Psectra diptera / Senya Grigorenko.

13.12.2015 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemerobiidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Hemerobius marginatus / Senya Grigorenko.

13.12.2015 2:39, Senya Grigorenko:

Sialis sp.

13.12.2015 2:34, Senya Grigorenko:

Psectra diptera

13.12.2015 2:32, Senya Grigorenko:

Hemerobius marginatus

13.12.2015 2:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peridrome orbicularis?

13.12.2015 1:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

See genus Episteme

13.12.2015 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hylotrupes bajulus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoferus campestris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.12.2015 0:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dorcadion elegans / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hylotrupes bajulus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerambycidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.12.2015 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carinatodorcadion carinatum carinatum / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

13.12.2015 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoferus campestris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elateridae / Irina Nikulina Athous haemorrhoidalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elateridae Athous haemorrhoidalis.

12.12.2015 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Elateridae Agrypnus murinus.

12.12.2015 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Imago Prionus coriarius / Female.

12.12.2015 21:51, Irina Nikulina:

Prionus coriarius?

12.12.2015 21:41, Irina Nikulina:

Athous haemorrhoidalis?

12.12.2015 21:40, Irina Nikulina:

Agrypnus murinus?

12.12.2015 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene alsoTrichoferus campestrislike? What do you think?
Snapshot hurt bad to just say (

12.12.2015 20:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dorcadion carinatum Carinatodorcadion carinatum carinatum.

12.12.2015 20:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dorcadion / Vasiliy Feoktistov Dorcadion carinatum / Evgeny Komarov.

12.12.2015 20:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Hylotrupes bajulus / Evgeny Komarov.

12.12.2015 19:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dorcadion / Vasiliy Feoktistov Dorcadion elegans / Evgeny Komarov.

12.12.2015 19:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Hylotrupes bajulus / Evgeny Komarov.

12.12.2015 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerambycidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerambycidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerambycidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dorcadion / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dorcadion / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoferus campestris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoferus campestris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.12.2015 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, and provides links to bugs that still need to add:
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/44102
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/44103
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43775
The two are no comments. Apparently they were not "admin" and were merely neoprene.

12.12.2015 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Lelia decempunctata.

12.12.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, did then and my beast: http://insecta.pro//ru/gallery/47684
Focus should be on the link that I gave in my last comment. Rod and source exists in the site, so this is no problem.
I then add in the form of synonyms geography and formalizes zone. I have everything ready for this.

12.12.2015 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Amendment)
Now valid name of the form Lethocerus cordofanus (Mayr, 1852) , and Lethocerus fakir and Belostoma niloticum stand in his Synonyms:
http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id701829/

12.12.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomini Lelia.

12.12.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pentatomini Pentatoma rufipes.

12.12.2015 18:25, Peter Khramov:

Basil, it's all right, just when the species is already defined, it is important to add the look and move Fautua than to see these specialists foty immediately (before transfer). But when Fota nowhere attached, and to determine there are no - there yes, if you see, at least to the order to transfer a good deed will be.

12.12.2015 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I frankly, apart from the fact that they are the eyes in the admin calluses and even seemed to do the right thing for spices in groups that are not browsing the entire site ..
It was inspired by this discussion here: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/49225

12.12.2015 17:18, Peter Khramov:

A foty and so in the gallery, but without binding. When pulled out, they then napryazhno seek to create new species.

12.12.2015 17:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, why can not pull out the views from the admin to higher taxa? why wait for the creation of forms that can be a photo already in the gallery?

12.12.2015 10:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Donaciinae / Irina Nikulina Donacia crassipes / Evgeny Komarov.

12.12.2015 10:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Donaciinae / Irina Nikulina Donacia crassipes / Evgeny Komarov.

12.12.2015 10:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Donaciinae / Irina Nikulina Donacia crassipes / Evgeny Komarov.

12.12.2015 10:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Donaciinae / Irina Nikulina Donacia crassipes / Evgeny Komarov.

12.12.2015 1:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then, it is not necessary that the version made its way from England in the graph "Synonyms and combinations" that's "[194]. Vasiliy Feoktistov." : http://insecta.pro / taxonomy / 992,731
TE .: themselves without synonyms, because they were driven out of the Russian version.194 is the number of the source from which hammered
About admin realized I will not touch :)
Pull them out (ticking) because almost during the quarter, they pretty my eyes namozolil (

12.12.2015 0:31, Peter Khramov:

This column can be infa and not in Latin. In both versions should be formalized synonyms vidiom.
ZY From the admin types not cleaned more in nadividovye taxa, OK? Gimorno look then, even with the comments.

12.12.2015 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nicrophorus Nicrophorus investigator.

11.12.2015 23:49, Irina Nikulina:

Donacia sp. (all 4). I doubt if the species is recognisable

11.12.2015 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Nicrophorus investigator I guess.

11.12.2015 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, still such a thing.
In addition to the form of information, when filling columns "Synonyms and combinations of the generic" infa laid only in the version from under which it hammered. Example: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/992731
There's a Russian version infa there, and when you go to from England lost (there is only the number of the source).And so things completely with all kinds of ((
We should make sure that it is published immediately in both versions.
After this infa in Latin, and in this case the drum main language of the site.
Latin, it is in Africa, Latin :)

11.12.2015 20:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Appasus major.

11.12.2015 20:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Lelia decempunctata.

11.12.2015 20:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera Urochela quadrinotata.

11.12.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.12.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.12.2015 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.12.2015 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.12.2015 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.12.2015 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.12.2015 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.12.2015 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.12.2015 16:53, Peter Khramov:

Wow.

11.12.2015 16:49, Peter Khramov:

Next week I will try to do everything.

11.12.2015 11:49, Evgeny Komarov:

I fully agree with Vasily. We must be able to work with the subspecies. Finish to clean up the huge genus Carabus, where a dozen or more subspecies of one species - the norm, while the site in the base set of species that has long kept in the sub-species, and vice versa.Edit existing list of subspecies and move view subspecies can not, in the end it turns out that either the taxon is in two persons - and the kind of independent and he is a subspecies of a different species or subspecies in the rank of species.

11.12.2015 0:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepturini Lepturalia nigripes.

11.12.2015 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepturini Lepturalia nigripes.

11.12.2015 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepturini / Imago / Irina Nikulina Anastrangalia reyi / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.12.2015 0:26, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, if you go to the link in the comments, again throws into English. version.

10.12.2015 23:45, Irina Nikulina:

Lepturalia nigripes?

10.12.2015 23:44, Irina Nikulina:

Lepturalia nigripes?

10.12.2015 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Did not have to wait: everything in the database is already in place proved worthwhile: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id170341/
In short: "Casket was just coming off" :)

10.12.2015 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Anoplistes halodendri ephippium / Evgeny Komarov.

10.12.2015 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. All the same make. It is urgent)

10.12.2015 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I would long ago have given if there was a ready mechanism. Old, who was a hundred years ago, it is now irrelevant, and the new is not yet complete. Once - instantly share.

10.12.2015 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Temporarily set it to the higher taxon.

10.12.2015 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieris / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

10.12.2015 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I repeat, but it is imperative)
Leave, please opportunity for curators to work with subspecies: do make, delete, edit, etc.
Long overdue, and "things are there" (
I am sure I will support all of the curators.

10.12.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Disassemble, Evgeniy :)
In Trachyderini they are now under the cerambycidae.org: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/842144
The site lies at me too, and I downloaded it turned out badly (
Will have to wait. Then I do taxon and transfer.

10.12.2015 20:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Plagionotus floralis / Evgeny Komarov.

10.12.2015 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Chlorophorus varius / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus antilope / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2015 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus antilope / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2015 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus antilope / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus arvicola / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus arvicola / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2015 19:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Ropalopus clavipes / Evgeny Komarov.

10.12.2015 19:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Ropalopus clavipes / Evgeny Komarov.

10.12.2015 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus arvicola / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2015 19:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Ropalopus clavipes / Evgeny Komarov.

10.12.2015 19:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Asias halodendri ephippium (Stevens & Dalman, 1817). Rare species in our area. In just a few decades, I know only find in the Volgograd region. This is the second.
Basil! I do not understand what's in the system with barbel and cerambycidae.org again "lies." Roda no where to be added in this version, I do not understand. Understand and add a genus / species. Tribe Purpuricenini missing?

10.12.2015 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.12.2015 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.12.2015 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.12.2015 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

10.12.2015 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

10.12.2015 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

10.12.2015 12:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Author image not confirm their determination -vyskazyvayutsya others.

10.12.2015 9:58, Tatiana Selena:

Perhaps I should not have to confirm, because they do not yet know exactly what kind of butterflies casually turned out!

10.12.2015 9:55, Tatiana Selena: This species is identified correctly.

10.12.2015 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eugene Karolinskiy.

10.12.2015 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Tentatively identified / Female / .

10.12.2015 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Eugene Karolinskiy.

10.12.2015 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

10.12.2015 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

10.12.2015 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

10.12.2015 8:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Xylotrechus antilope Xylotrechus arvicola.

10.12.2015 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

10.12.2015 8:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Xylotrechus antilope Xylotrechus arvicola.

10.12.2015 8:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Xylotrechus antilope Xylotrechus arvicola.

10.12.2015 8:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Xylotrechus antilope Xylotrechus arvicola.

10.12.2015 8:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Xylotrechus antilope Xylotrechus arvicola.

10.12.2015 8:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Xylotrechus antilope Xylotrechus arvicola.

10.12.2015 8:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Xylotrechus antilope Xylotrechus arvicola.

10.12.2015 5:02, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

10.12.2015 2:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

?Ischnura elegans, ♀

10.12.2015 2:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ischnura elegans

10.12.2015 2:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Calopteryx splendens, ♀

10.12.2015 2:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Calopteryx splendens, ♀

10.12.2015 2:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Calopteryx splendens, ♀

10.12.2015 2:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO yes.

10.12.2015 2:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Oh, good life, I did not know him. Thank you.

How much shorter mask simpekm have - I do not know. IMHO if shorter, slightly. In general, in this shot, I would not have taken significantly distinguished from halkolestesov simpekm. I called pedisku the most, in my opinion, the likely choice for the Moscow region.Or maybe from that brought imago larvae, and we head to break? :)

What is the female, seen from the ovipositor. :)

09.12.2015 23:50, Irina Nikulina:

It's probably Camponotus sachalinensis too?

09.12.2015 23:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica pratensis / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica fusca / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Camponotus sachalinensis / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Camponotus sachalinensis / Female / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Myrmica rubra / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

09.12.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Myrmica rubra / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica cunicularia / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica cunicularia / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica cunicularia / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica cunicularia / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica pratensis / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Myrmica rubra / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Irina Nikulina Formica pratensis / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Myrmica rubra / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Zryanin.

09.12.2015 23:07, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, you are right, Mr thus asked to pose) Thank you for all of today's definition!

09.12.2015 22:34, Vladimir Zryanin:

Work Formica fusca with prey

09.12.2015 22:27, Vladimir Zryanin:

Camponotus sachalinensis

09.12.2015 22:24, Vladimir Zryanin:

Myrmica ?rubra

09.12.2015 22:24, Vladimir Zryanin:

Myrmica ?rubra

09.12.2015 22:23, Vladimir Zryanin:

Formica cunicularia

09.12.2015 22:22, Vladimir Zryanin:

Formica cunicularia

09.12.2015 22:22, Vladimir Zryanin:

Work Formica cunicularia

09.12.2015 22:20, Vladimir Zryanin:

Blue Formica pratensis received seed, probably from the author photo

09.12.2015 22:17, Vladimir Zryanin:

Formica pratensis

09.12.2015 22:17, Vladimir Zryanin:

Myrmica ?rubra

09.12.2015 22:16, Vladimir Zryanin:

workers Formica pratensis produced caterpillar

09.12.2015 22:14, Vladimir Zryanin:

Working Myrmica? Rubra colonies of aphids

09.12.2015 22:11, Vladimir Zryanin:

It is likely that the female is fertilized Camponotus sachalinensis Forel, 1904

09.12.2015 22:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.12.2015 21:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arhopalus rusticus Trichoferus campestris.

09.12.2015 21:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Chlorophorus varius / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus antilope / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Chlorophorus varius / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Chlorophorus varius / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus antilope / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Plagionotus floralis / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Plagionotus floralis / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:02, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus antilope / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus antilope / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 21:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Xylotrechus antilope / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 20:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Chlorophorus varius / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 20:55, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Clytus rhamni / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 20:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Ivan Pristrem Clytus rhamni / Evgeny Komarov.

09.12.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.12.2015 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.12.2015 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Determined the corrected because under the number 49693 is the definition, for two photos.

09.12.2015 14:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.12.2015 12:16, Peter Khramov:

Well, just escape from paradise.

09.12.2015 11:39, Irina Nikulina:

Here, a precise definition, probably can not be. I would put in thePieris dulcinea, the female, the second generation in inaccurate because Sinev on Sakhalin and the Kuriles lives more Pieris pseudonapi Verity, 1911 (previously considered a subspecies dulcinea), butterflies differ somewhat smaller size and lighter background. [2] With subspecies also need to understand. There http://rusinsects.com/pi-dulc.htm for Sakhalin subspecies Set dulcinea saghalensis Nakahara, 1926 , but "to the insects of the DDA" v.5, part 5 of the same subspecies Set to Pieris pseudonapi , and general appearance Pieris dulcinea is not indicated for Sakhalin.

09.12.2015 10:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx / Irina Nikulina Calopteryx virgo / Eugene Karolinskiy.

09.12.2015 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Nikolai Vladimirov Pyrrhosoma nymphula / Eugene Karolinskiy.

09.12.2015 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx / Confidently identified Calopteryx virgo / Tentatively identified.

09.12.2015 8:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea deserticola / Oleg Seliverstov Melitaea didyma / Niyaz Ismagilov.

09.12.2015 8:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea deserticola / Oleg Seliverstov Melitaea didyma / Niyaz Ismagilov.

08.12.2015 23:16, Peter Khramov:

And the reason is still unknown.

08.12.2015 22:47, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Melitaea didyma

08.12.2015 22:47, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Melitaea didyma

08.12.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

At first there was, but then fell off. It happens ((

08.12.2015 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Irina Nikulina Platycnemis pennipes / Eugene Karolinskiy.

08.12.2015 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only now are able to do)

08.12.2015 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #49627 group.

08.12.2015 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.12.2015 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Don't forget to call me back.

08.12.2015 16:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! What's up with butterflies in the frame. I open this weekend)))

08.12.2015 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Fixed bugs that occur in some cases when ordering online store.insecta.pro. Thanks to everyone who took the trouble mayaknut these bugs.

08.12.2015 12:17, Nikolay Grebennikov:

19 mm wingspan.

08.12.2015 11:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio peranthus / Confidently identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

08.12.2015 6:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Papilio peranthus Fabricius, 1787. ssp.?

08.12.2015 0:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

I do not know whether you can trust this resource: http://www.naturefoto2000.com/cs/fotografie-3499/vazky-odonata/sidlatka-velka-chalcolestes-viridis-zygoptera-odonata/,
but the photo did not find differences.
In my opinion at Sympecma mask is shorter.
In any case, I do not insist.
Eugene, and what gender differences - painting?

07.12.2015 23:45, Irina Nikulina:

All 4 -Calopteryx splendens?

07.12.2015 23:39, Irina Nikulina:

Of course, Eugene, once there is at least a minimum doubt, it's better to inaccurate)

07.12.2015 23:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Calopteryx ?virgo, ♂

07.12.2015 23:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Calopteryx ?virgo, ♂

07.12.2015 23:26, Eugene Karolinskiy:

The transfer did not happen? Failure?

07.12.2015 23:24, Eugene Karolinskiy:

?? Cordulia aenea

07.12.2015 23:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Perhaps Chalcolestes sp. (But did they do from the Moscow region?). But IMHO possible Sympecma sp. And judging by geography, S. paedisca - the most likely possibility. Or am I missing something of the sort?

By the way, the female image. :)

07.12.2015 23:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Pyrrhosoma nymphula

07.12.2015 16:25, Alexander Belousov:

Before pupating caterpillars were dokormleny ordinary vegetable garden horseradish (Armoracia).

07.12.2015 16:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx virgo.

07.12.2015 7:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! Photo №49608 should be grouped with №49627, №49624 with photos and cancel. He wrote under the photo, but it is far from comments left.

07.12.2015 6:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Sympetrum striolatum ?

07.12.2015 6:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Sympetrum striolatum ?

07.12.2015 6:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Sympetrum striolatum ?

07.12.2015 2:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Sympetrum uniforme ?

07.12.2015 2:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Sympetrum uniforme ?

07.12.2015 1:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx / Confidently identified Calopteryx virgo / Tentatively identified.

07.12.2015 1:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Anisoptera / Imago Sympetrum danae / Male.

07.12.2015 1:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Aeshna crenata / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

07.12.2015 1:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum risi / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

07.12.2015 1:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Eugene Karolinskiy.

07.12.2015 0:59, Irina Nikulina:

"Say ch-e-e-e-se!")) (for mood) Determine Eugene Carolinsky

07.12.2015 0:25, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, here are a couple of photos of the same series from the same place, the difference in a few minutes, but the angle other grass back there, in the shade of a tree, the outbreak of "flat". All four live looked the same, lie in my folderCalopteryx virgo

07.12.2015 0:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Irina Nikulina Aeshna crenata / Eugene Karolinskiy.

07.12.2015 0:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

Now, respectively,Chalcolestes viridis.

06.12.2015 23:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aeshna crenata ♀

06.12.2015 23:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aeshna crenata ♀

06.12.2015 23:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum risi ♂

06.12.2015 23:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum danae, ♂

06.12.2015 23:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yet more Calopteryx virgo :) (inaccurately?)

06.12.2015 23:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

OK, Irina, thank you. I also thought a lot :) and decided that probably you are right and I was wrong. Rather, it is Virgo. I would still put the imprecise definition.

06.12.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Libellula quadrimaculata / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Libellula quadrimaculata / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Libellula quadrimaculata / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum eroticum / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum cordulegaster / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Irina Nikulina Pantala flavescens / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 23:08, Irina Nikulina:

Specially set female Virgo exactly from the same place, just a meter) there in July, both species in large numbers to fly and live confused impossible - splendens very typical discolored areas, and the pair even when shooting seemed quite different, namely such as on makroide (and not only there), I perceived them.Flash (looked EXIF) could highlight a little root zone. Now I find more in this series and put)

06.12.2015 23:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Libellula quadrimaculata ♂

06.12.2015 23:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Libellula quadrimaculata ♀

06.12.2015 23:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum sp.

06.12.2015 23:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum eroticum ♂

06.12.2015 23:00, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum cordulegaster ♀

06.12.2015 22:59, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Pantala flavescens

06.12.2015 22:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Um, I have some doubts, of course, is ... the more that a typical Virgo female appeared. :) Typical male Virgo about this: http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=132872 - are you? Photography can distort reality. Yet it seems to me that these two male big bet - at splendens. :)

06.12.2015 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx virgo.

06.12.2015 22:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 22:38, Irina Nikulina:

And this is not the femaleCalopteryx virgo?

06.12.2015 22:34, Irina Nikulina:

I do not know, Eugene) I would not say that, especially on the tops of the wings ..) They are different from all splendens, which are now set. But this is my amateurish opinion, the trained eye, well, just not special)

06.12.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

To me, it looks more like aPhtheochroa krulikovskiji(Obraztsov, 1944) We should see the first description of both types in a single article, what they look different and how to write krulikovsk iji

06.12.2015 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Sympetrum eroticum / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Sympetrum / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Sympetrum striolatum / Tentatively identified / Female / Yuri Semejkin.

06.12.2015 21:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO they are colorless, but on the background of green vegetation seems stained. No?

06.12.2015 21:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum sp., ♂

06.12.2015 21:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Probably, although no certainty. Female.

06.12.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.12.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.12.2015 21:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum ?eroticum, ♀

06.12.2015 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Sympetrum cordulegaster / Confidently identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

06.12.2015 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

06.12.2015 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

06.12.2015 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

06.12.2015 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

06.12.2015 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calopteryx Calopteryx splendens.

06.12.2015 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Irina Nikulina Platycnemis pennipes / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aeshnidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Aeshna cyanea / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Platycnemis pennipes / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Platycnemis pennipes / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Irina Nikulina Platycnemis pennipes / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Irina Nikulina Platycnemis pennipes / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.12.2015 20:48, Fedor Ovechkin:

Odonata, it would be necessary to transfer and then hang up without definition (+ №№49656, 49655, 49654).

06.12.2015 20:38, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Eugene, for the entire series! Here she saw colorless base of the wings and tops and even a "?" not delivered, what is not typical splendens (for me))

06.12.2015 20:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum cordulegaster, ♀

06.12.2015 20:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Calopteryx splendens

06.12.2015 20:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Calopteryx splendens

06.12.2015 20:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Coenagrionidae / Irina Nikulina Ischnura elegans / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 20:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 20:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 20:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 20:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 20:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 20:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ischnura elegans

06.12.2015 20:22, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 20:21, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis pennipes

06.12.2015 20:21, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aeshna cyanea, ♀

06.12.2015 20:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis pennipes, ♀

06.12.2015 20:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis pennipes, ♀

06.12.2015 20:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ischnura elegans, ♀

06.12.2015 20:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis pennipes

06.12.2015 20:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ischnura elegans

06.12.2015 20:17, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis pennipes

06.12.2015 20:17, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ischnura elegans, ♀

06.12.2015 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chrysotoxum / Imago Chrysotoxum verralli / Male.

06.12.2015 20:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

In the author's comments. typo. Type in the database have -Chrysotoxum verralli. Male.

06.12.2015 20:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pseudoophonus rufipes Harpalus rufipes.

06.12.2015 20:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pseudoophonus rufipes Harpalus rufipes.

06.12.2015 20:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

Kind of do not need to add, is synonymous withHelophilus eristaloidea(see. Comm.'s).

06.12.2015 20:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! this picture should be grouped with №49627 !!

06.12.2015 19:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus rufipes / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus calceatus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 19:48, Irina Nikulina:

Calopteryx virgo

06.12.2015 19:48, Irina Nikulina:

Calopteryx virgo

06.12.2015 19:47, Irina Nikulina:

Calopteryx splendens

06.12.2015 19:47, Irina Nikulina:

Calopteryx splendens

06.12.2015 19:47, Irina Nikulina:

Calopteryx splendens?

06.12.2015 19:46, Irina Nikulina:

Calopteryx splendens?

06.12.2015 19:46, Irina Nikulina:

Calopteryx splendens

06.12.2015 19:45, Irina Nikulina:

Calopteryx splendens

06.12.2015 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eristalinae Chalcosyrphus valgus.

06.12.2015 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eristalinae Chalcosyrphus valgus.

06.12.2015 17:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

There is a view in the database:Chalcosyrphus valgus(see. Comm.'s).

06.12.2015 16:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Sympetrum striolatum ?

06.12.2015 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ivan can not fix. This is a question to me. It seems to understand.

06.12.2015 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #49624 group.

06.12.2015 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

06.12.2015 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

06.12.2015 13:50, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 13:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

06.12.2015 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Platycnemis pennipes / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Platycnemis pennipes / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Platycnemis pennipes / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Platycnemis pennipes / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 13:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

06.12.2015 13:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Ophonus Semiophonus signaticornis.

06.12.2015 13:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis ?pennipes, ♀

06.12.2015 13:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis ?pennipes, ♀

06.12.2015 13:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Platycnemis ?pennipes, ♂

06.12.2015 12:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus rubripes / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Cylindera germanica / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus froelichii / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:49, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morimus funereus Morimus asper funereus.

06.12.2015 12:47, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 12:47, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morimus funereus Morimus asper funereus.

06.12.2015 12:46, Evgeny Komarov:

H. ruphipes always with svtlymi course, much more pointed and hairy elytra.

06.12.2015 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morimus funereus Morimus asper funereus.

06.12.2015 12:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan, correct - in your photos, "the same individuals were different types!

06.12.2015 12:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Harpalus rufipes / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus calceatus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Polistichus connexus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus smaragdinus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:39, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 12:38, Evgeny Komarov:

"Young" nedookrashenny copies. - I do not presume to species.

06.12.2015 12:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Ophonus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus serripes / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lebia / Ivan Pristrem Lebia cyanocephala / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:31, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 12:31, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 12:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Cylindera germanica / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus rubripes / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus distinguendus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus distinguendus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Dolichus halensis / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Confidently identified / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus serripes / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Dolichus halensis / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus froelichii / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus calceatus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Harpalus distinguendus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Ivan Pristrem Cicindela sahlbergii / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 12:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, in the authors note - "steppe habitat type" :). And these two kinds of BM reliably differ in size (it is impossible to evaluate), elytra mikroskeulpturoy (microscope is needed) and absolutely reliably - male genitalia. Just meridionalis have much more frequently than bullatus. Let it be so.

06.12.2015 11:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eugene, judging by space - an area of ​​gardens and trees there just is.

06.12.2015 10:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Perhaps, Badister bullatus, but this species mainly in forest habitats in our region. There would have to assess the size of the ...

06.12.2015 10:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Badister / Confidently identified Badister meridionalis / Tentatively identified.

06.12.2015 10:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela campestris / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 10:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Amara / Ivan Pristrem Amara consularis / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Acinopus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Broscus Broscus semistriatus.

06.12.2015 9:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela campestris / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:45, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dicercini / Vasiliy Feoktistov Dicerca aenea / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coraebus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Coraebus rubi / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela campestris / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Broscus Broscus semistriatus.

06.12.2015 9:39, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Broscus Broscus semistriatus.

06.12.2015 9:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Capnodis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Capnodis tenebrionis / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela campestris / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coraebus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Coraebus rubi / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Capnodis Capnodis tenebrionis.

06.12.2015 9:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Capnodis tenebrionis / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Capnodis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Capnodis tenebrionis / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Capnodis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Capnodis tenebrionis / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Podonta daghestanica / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Omophlus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Omophlus proteus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Omophlus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Omophlus proteus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dicerca Dicerca aenea.

06.12.2015 9:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dicerca Dicerca aenea.

06.12.2015 9:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dicerca Dicerca aenea.

06.12.2015 9:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acmaeodera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Acmaeoderella mimonti / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coraebus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Coraebus rubi / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coraebus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Coraebus rubi / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coraebus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Coraebus rubi / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

06.12.2015 9:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Harpalus zabroides / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Harpalus zabroides / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Harpalus zabroides / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Acinopus ammophilus / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 9:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthaxia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Anthaxia cichorii / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 8:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cantharis rustica / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 8:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cantharis rustica / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 8:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cantharis rustica / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 8:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cantharis livida / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 8:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cantharis livida / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 8:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cantharis livida / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 8:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthaxia Anthaxia podolica.

06.12.2015 8:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anthaxia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Anthaxia cichorii / Evgeny Komarov.

06.12.2015 1:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sympetrum / Imago Sympetrum pedemontanum / Female.

06.12.2015 1:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sympetrum / Imago Sympetrum flaveolum / Male.

06.12.2015 1:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum vulgatum / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum vulgatum / Tentatively identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Onychogomphus forcipatus / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Imago / Irina Nikulina Ophiogomphus cecilia / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Imago Sympetrum pedemontanum / Female.

06.12.2015 1:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae Libellula depressa.

06.12.2015 1:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Male / Irina Nikulina Libellula fulva / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonata / Confidently identified / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum sanguineum / Tentatively identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum flaveolum / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum flaveolum / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum sanguineum / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gomphidae / Imago Gomphus vulgatissimus / Female.

06.12.2015 1:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gomphidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Gomphus vulgatissimus / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gomphidae / Imago Gomphus vulgatissimus / Male.

06.12.2015 1:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gomphidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Gomphus vulgatissimus / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 1:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Sympetrum sanguineum / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very impressive wing span (cm. Comment).
On the adjacent photo seems that the same kind as the adults of other species in places I did not collect.
Who could it be?

06.12.2015 0:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum sanguineum, ♀

06.12.2015 0:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Male / Irina Nikulina Libellula fulva / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Gomphus vulgatissimus, ♀

06.12.2015 0:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

06.12.2015 0:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Gomphidae / Imago / Irina Nikulina Gomphus vulgatissimus / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

06.12.2015 0:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Gomphus vulgatissimus, ♂

06.12.2015 0:41, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 0:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

06.12.2015 0:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Sympetrum / Imago Sympetrum pedemontanum / Female.

06.12.2015 0:40, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 0:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Gomphus vulgatissimus, ♀

06.12.2015 0:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum sanguineum, ♀

06.12.2015 0:38, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum flaveolum, ♀

06.12.2015 0:38, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum flaveolum

06.12.2015 0:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Libellula fulva, ♀

06.12.2015 0:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Larger view ... And would not the winning ..

06.12.2015 0:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Libellula fulva, ♀

06.12.2015 0:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

06.12.2015 0:33, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 0:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female

06.12.2015 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ophiogomphus cecilia, female

06.12.2015 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Onychogomphus forcipatus, male

06.12.2015 0:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum ?sanguineum, female

06.12.2015 0:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum ?vulgatum, male

06.12.2015 0:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum ?vulgatum, female

06.12.2015 0:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female.

06.12.2015 0:26, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2015 0:26, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

05.12.2015 22:09, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, bulky (uncomfortable, I guess. At Canon looked much more elegant)

05.12.2015 21:11, Peter Khramov:

I have the opposite problem. At Fujifilm X20 screen was not, was a beauty on the X30 screen put ugly. Looks - horror.

05.12.2015 20:08, Irina Nikulina:

:)) With turning, Peter. On the Canon G11 + had a Super Macro mode, but on subsequent models in this series, starting with the G15, have taken, and removed for some reason (Well, sit down, of course, I had to :)

05.12.2015 20:02, Peter Khramov:

It shtozh, lying, al screen turning what?

05.12.2015 20:01, Peter Khramov:

I was going to when the next major update to the database. However, since it is delayed, it seems, will have to add the most right-handed. And in the future - just the kinds of taxa without curator of the admin is not cleaned. I would add.

05.12.2015 19:26, Irina Nikulina:

Sympetrum flaveolum, the male?

05.12.2015 19:25, Irina Nikulina:

Sympetrum pedemontanum?

05.12.2015 19:14, Irina Nikulina:

Libellula depressa?

05.12.2015 19:13, Irina Nikulina:

Libellula depressa?

05.12.2015 19:12, Irina Nikulina:

Libellula depressa?

05.12.2015 19:12, Irina Nikulina:

Sympetrum pedemontanum?

05.12.2015 19:03, Irina Nikulina:

Gomphus vulgatissimus?

05.12.2015 19:02, Irina Nikulina:

Gomphus vulgatissimus?

05.12.2015 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Prepona praeneste Prepona praeneste confusa.

05.12.2015 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Prepona praeneste Prepona praeneste confusa.

05.12.2015 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's time to add. Especially all types defined.
And when were you going? ........
And let the best admin occupy the tasony have someone with whom to engage in at the moment.

05.12.2015 16:38, Peter Khramov:

If I understand correctly, then delete it. Bo to the insects do not apply in the modern sense.

05.12.2015 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I commentaries can find and add views as you have time. Or help the curator if appears specials for the same bugs. Then all the rules.

05.12.2015 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Provided also that moment.
See. Comments. Each Fota signed: "extracted from the admin."
Example: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42898
Finally. What are they already lie motionless?

05.12.2015 15:17, Peter Khramov:

I propose to take the time and make the most correct, and if to something hands do not reach, simply otkladvat until the side.

05.12.2015 14:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Clearly, Peter!

05.12.2015 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and as we now seek views from the admin? ..))

05.12.2015 12:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Heterarmia dissimilis / Irina Nikulina.

05.12.2015 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

At the moment all uncertain to type photos (including those who were in moderation) has placed for the convenience of the higher taxa.
I ask all to follow the request of Peter when downloading photos.

05.12.2015 11:30, Ivan Pristrem:

Once again I apologize for the inconvenience. I put too much at once, and the group did not have time to do everything at once.

05.12.2015 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can Acleris pulchella Primorye in its subspecies mundana ?. But this is only speculation.

05.12.2015 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from the admin area.

05.12.2015 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Hemiptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.12.2015 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from the admin area.

05.12.2015 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera.

05.12.2015 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from the admin area.

05.12.2015 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera.

05.12.2015 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from the admin area.

05.12.2015 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera.

05.12.2015 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from the admin area.

05.12.2015 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera.

05.12.2015 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from the admin area.

05.12.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aphrophora.

05.12.2015 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from the admin area.

05.12.2015 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hemiptera.

05.12.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Certainly correctly. I'm just too busy right now to follow this (a bit confused raking).

05.12.2015 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from admin

05.12.2015 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chrysotoxum.

05.12.2015 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.12.2015 10:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae Carterocephalus silvicola.

05.12.2015 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Determination author: Bicolorana roeselii (Hagenbach, 1822)

05.12.2015 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bicolorana.

05.12.2015 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Yuri Semejkin.

05.12.2015 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Determination author: Bicolorana roeselii (Hagenbach, 1822)

05.12.2015 10:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Bicolorana / Nikolai Vladimirov.

05.12.2015 10:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae Satyrium acaciae.

05.12.2015 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the author of the photo identified to genus, but doubts'? " You put the definition of the family and other authorship. I think it will be correct. :)

05.12.2015 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus.

05.12.2015 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus.

05.12.2015 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vladimir Deryabin.

05.12.2015 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from admin

05.12.2015 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eristalinae.

05.12.2015 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Extracted from admin

05.12.2015 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eristalinae.

05.12.2015 10:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev Not identified.

05.12.2015 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev Not identified.

05.12.2015 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev Not identified.

05.12.2015 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev Not identified.

05.12.2015 10:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Phyllobius maculicornis.

05.12.2015 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not slip. Photos transferred to the family Lycaenidae, which includes a butterfly.
Simply, it belongs to another subfamily unlike the butterfly in the photo number 49083 and accordingly looks different.
Here: http://insecta.pro/ru/community/50634 base my actions.

05.12.2015 9:59, Ivan Pristrem:

I apologize for the inconvenience. I used to use Yandex cards and somehow did not think that someone may cause such difficulties. From now on, I will consider it.

05.12.2015 9:20, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, genus and species just can not find, so long as the transfer is made only to the detachment. As a genus / species will be - we transfer to them.

05.12.2015 8:15, Vladimir Deryabin:

Vasily, thank you. But do not slip it? After all, the picture is quite different number 49083 butterfly with the same name.

05.12.2015 4:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri is bringing order to folders "undefined" - solely for the convenience of working with her.
Base: http://insecta.pro/ru/community/50634
Tepe is advisable to follow these recommendations.
Now there is nobody in charge of bedbugs (add taxa). And when there will be taxa - photo will be taken at the place specified by you and determination to species will greatly facilitate the task.

05.12.2015 1:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil ! And why only a detachment Set? After I gave a link to the author's definition, which is one of the country's leading experts in Siberia and the Far East. View Lelia decempunctata (Motschulsky, 1860) is given in the book NN Vinokourov, EV Kanyukova, VV Golub catalog Hemiptera insects (HETEROPTERA) Asian part of Russia. Novosibirsk "Science" 2010, page 259.

04.12.2015 21:32, Alex Dumchus:

Got :)

04.12.2015 21:28, Alex Dumchus:

Basil, I'm tied. WMS computer where glyuknul. Schazz look

04.12.2015 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That such "friends" did not have a clue what to do:
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/48181
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/48180
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47638
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47635
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47634
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47633
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47632
Sobrazheny no one on this score?

04.12.2015 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Done :)

04.12.2015 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #49226 group.

04.12.2015 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomelidae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.12.2015 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.12.2015 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.12.2015 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.12.2015 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.12.2015 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Camponotus / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

04.12.2015 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Camponotus / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

04.12.2015 20:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is advisable to associate with 49226. It is one and the same butterfly.

04.12.2015 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Polypogon tentacularia / Irina Nikulina.

04.12.2015 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomela / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

04.12.2015 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tachinidae / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

04.12.2015 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lytta menetriesi / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

04.12.2015 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to add a subspecies of Lytta vesicatoria togata Fischer von Waldheim, 1844 : http://www.meloidae.com/en/pictures/31471/?s=1
And then move to it :)

04.12.2015 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lytta vesicatoria / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

04.12.2015 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

04.12.2015 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bombus / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

04.12.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.12.2015 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.12.2015 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.12.2015 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.12.2015 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, please contact your images into groups where these or implied.
I'm not doing this on a regular basis, but only corrects errors arising in this respect.

04.12.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #49316 group.

04.12.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.12.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sphingidae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.12.2015 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Curculionidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 19:19, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.12.2015 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epimeces / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 19:17, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lytta menetriesi / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

04.12.2015 19:16, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 19:15, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 19:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 19:13, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 19:12, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 19:10, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By analogy with the photo in the group.

04.12.2015 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapanthia / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That sorted out :)
Fedor, thanks for the clarification of the geography of the coordinates.
In fact, if we are still here and will be guess geography - I'm afraid we will not last long (

04.12.2015 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anthaxia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Anthaxia cichorii / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Generally feed geography only in this form (data alone GPS) is not desired.
Ivan, good enough to indicate that data other than coordinate, and even normal, human language.

04.12.2015 19:00, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 18:52, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neighborhoods Volgograd.

04.12.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesperiidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaenidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus occipitalis / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

04.12.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus occipitalis / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

04.12.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:42, Fedor Ovechkin:

This garden 5 km west of Volgograd, about its central part.

04.12.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acmaeodera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coraebus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coraebus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:38, Peter Khramov:

Volgograd and the neighborhood is not?

04.12.2015 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coraebus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Omophlus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Omophlus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Omophlus proteus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Badister meridionalis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dixus eremita / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysobothris affinis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela campestris / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Capnodis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So much for rdnim GPS data to find out no one here geography is not.
So let pobudet to certain species.

04.12.2015 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia manca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrilus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 18:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrilus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Without optimism anywhere :) But he remains .....

04.12.2015 13:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, you are optimistic about the "fall into place")))

04.12.2015 12:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is too early to make a mandatory introduction of literary source. This actually do, when it is more or less everything will fall into place.
At the initial stage, when the kind of places have to shove it packs greatly complicate the process.
In short: I am for putting justify transfer. But it is not momentary and later.

04.12.2015 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia manca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 12:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dicerca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.12.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 12:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 12:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 12:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrilus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 12:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Capnodis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.12.2015 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

I got error transfer, put into place :)

04.12.2015 12:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agrodiaetus phillidis Polyommatus phyllides.

04.12.2015 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I just suffered in the author's version based on the fact that he had written on the top line, in order to remove from uncertain :)
Well, then the case of curators group.

04.12.2015 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

As for the transfer studies, it is necessary to clearly literary source. Odnaznachno complicate zhiz curators, if oyazatelnym (preferably compulsory)

04.12.2015 11:02, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, it's not what people are interested in, which loads foty. The fact is that now when booting you need to write the definition of at least up to the order (or family, etc.) to the people who look only butterflies, see your foty.

04.12.2015 10:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Limnobaris dolorosa Limnobaris t-album.

04.12.2015 10:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dermestidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Attagenus smirnovi / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

04.12.2015 10:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dermestidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Attagenus smirnovi / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

04.12.2015 10:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Dermestidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Attagenus smirnovi / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

04.12.2015 8:36, Fedor Ovechkin:

PerhapsAttagenus smirnovi.

04.12.2015 7:54, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. For example, I only interested in butterflies. And writing on undefined butterflies in a row definition - "Lepidoptera"?

04.12.2015 0:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I did not understand the situation a little bit, please explain.
Toropov defines species as Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) phyllides (Staudinger, 1886), you transfer it to another species Polyommatus (Agrodiaetus) phillidis Grum-Grshimailo. On what basis? Then for some reason, in the rank of subgenus sort of, a lot of doubles in the genus Polyommatus. We must unite and extra clean, Korb Where? :)

04.12.2015 0:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus thersites / Eugene Davkaev Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.12.2015 0:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is not 100% thersites, icarus, if there is not anything like that.

03.12.2015 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Dermestidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Dermestidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Dermestidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 23:54, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Badister / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:43, Evgeny Komarov:

It is unrealistic to even up this kind of perspective. Approximately genus Harpalus /

03.12.2015 21:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Calathus ambiguus / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Broscus / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cantharis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cantharis livida / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Chlaenius tristis / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Broscus / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela campestris / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Broscus / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Capnodis tenebrionis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amara similata / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dicerca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dicerca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:19, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dicerca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dicerca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dixus eremita / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amara similata / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrilus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 21:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia deaurata / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia manca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia manca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela campestris / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela campestris / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela campestris / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela campestris / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela campestris / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela campestris / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cicindela campestris / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 21:01, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis livida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Location shooting collection? Desirably resolution.

03.12.2015 20:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Badisis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela campestris / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Badister meridionalis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan, this kind of "mysteries" should be spread, knowing look. This is one of the two: Capnodis tenebrionis (90%) or Capnodis tenebricosa (when a metallic shade is still not visible in the picture, but it really is). Written true of the half of the Russian Federation.

03.12.2015 20:49, Evgeny Komarov:

If the Volgograd region, this Anthaxia cichorii.

03.12.2015 20:47, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Omophlus proteus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Place shooting date !?

03.12.2015 20:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela campestris / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amara consularis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan! Write the place / date of recording. If this is the Lower Volga, it's Amara consularis. If outside the Russian Federation, it is likely that she is the place :) No shooting date does not make sense to spread the pictures here.

03.12.2015 20:34, Evgeny Komarov:

If this is the Lower Volga region, how can I assume that Acmaeoderella flavofasciata. If somewhere in the exotic, then ... indicates the location / date of recording!

03.12.2015 20:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Acmaeoderini / Vasiliy Feoktistov Acmaeoderella flavofasciata / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan, I realize that in our area of ​​other species (or similar) is not (but I understand) so indicate the place / date of recording must be as accurate as possible, otherwise the value of your image is almost zero (especially if the author of the image does not know that relieves or ukakzyvaet species affiliation)!

03.12.2015 20:08, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coraebus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Coraebus rubi / Evgeny Komarov.

03.12.2015 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coraebus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acmaeoderini / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Capnodis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coraebus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Capnodis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter did not realize that you are offered on the twins. The trouble is that the "strange" double also have a network, in other bases. Another thing is that to some extent he finally taxonomically undefined, ie "dubious" look. Remove it and replace an existing? Perhaps this is a real synonym of "something."And it is impossible to do so, as I understand it in a hurry, that is, permitted the existence of the same species with different authors / years and a new kind of institution. If not, you act on the proposed option - to replace "human" author / year and the elimination of "it is not clear what". I would like to participate then the rest of the curators. The question is not easy ..

03.12.2015 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:45, Evgeny Komarov:

If you have the opportunity to double, distinguished only by the author / year - is perfect, then do not delete - the issue will be resolved in due course.
What about "the line" Let's fellow supervisors will vote all the same. Although transfer to synonyms, transfer to another family is just as important to justify not just "my left leg felt like it."But the problems curators explicitly added. Let's wait for the rest of the views.

03.12.2015 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coraebus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dicercini / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia quadripunctata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carabidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the date of the picture and geography?

03.12.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrilus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrilus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to have at least some hint of the geography of the picture .....
Without geography only to the family. Although their geography and a difficult to form (

03.12.2015 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthaxia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.12.2015 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.12.2015 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arctiidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.12.2015 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptidea / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

03.12.2015 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus thersites / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chazara enervata / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.12.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chazara briseis / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrodiaetus phillidis / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyponephele lupinus / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrium acaudata / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chazara enervata / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chazara enervata / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thymelicus lineola / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucopsyche laetifica / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius apollonius gloriosus / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

03.12.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.12.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scattered on orders, of course. If there is a need.
I do not use a sample of orders and prefer to view the entire site. I am so even better :)

03.12.2015 18:09, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, and do not undercut Fautua tightly? God be with him, which is less than 320 turned out ...

03.12.2015 18:07, Peter Khramov:

I agree. If there is a strange counterpart to the human species, then:
The Double Do not remove a new type will not start, and change the characteristics of the twin on the human (eg, author / year).
With regard to transfer power - a good question. Making the line? Or too hard it will have to curators?

03.12.2015 18:04, Peter Khramov:

Reminder:
1. Now, photos can be assigned not only to species, but any taxa at all, including subspecies, genera, families, orders, etc.
2. People who are interested in only one taxon (eg, butterflies), may limit the output of data on the site (including pictures) thereby taxon.

So, please, assign new photos at least to order (or any other taxon level) — then it will be seen by those who are interested in this taxon. If you leave your photo withous identification whatsoever, the taxon specialists may or may not see you photo, it depends on their personal Insecta.pro settings.

If something is unclear — do not hesitate, ask.

03.12.2015 18:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Irina Nikulina Paragabara ochreipennis / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.12.2015 17:57, Peter Khramov:

How machine understands where the beetle, and where the bees? .. If people are not put at least to define the order, it will not appear. Accordingly, from time to time it is good to look through foty uncertain, but it is the task of those who have no restrictions on the conclusion of taxa, apparently. Basil, take?

03.12.2015 17:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

And I do not see it (the photo). I sample is on the Lepidoptera, I even thought that all automatic indefinite shove on orders :)

03.12.2015 17:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polypogon tentacularia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.12.2015 16:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Just another example: to be in the genus Curculio European Curculio nucum Linnaeus, 1758 , - it is not, but there is a completely incomprehensibleCurculio nucumOlivier, AG

03.12.2015 16:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Offer is in private to discuss the situation with the genusCurculiosite. There's now even too lazy to count how many hundreds of species of fell into it. In this way from the time of Linnaeus describes all weevils, weight synonyms obscure titles and much more.Trying to clean up a little there showed that in our database have here is:Curculio elephas- kind of strange, allegedly described from Africa, to understand what brought him there and brought subsequently fails and, accordingly, the place of transfer, also. And missing in our database real European Curculio elephas Gyllenhaal, 1836 can not be added because elephas already have one.The case, like a private, but a couple of situations exactly razrulil finding where to move the species of this family and will definitely be more. For Palearctic challenge BM Solved, thanks Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, but with views outside it, alas. In this way just to be at least a hundred species, which have long to seek proper place in the system, while the real hang species.Maybe fundamentally solve the problem of species for which status has not been clarified, and simply delete them from our records, of course, after a thorough check of all possible sources?By the way, and the question arises incidentally site if we necessarily indicate the source of information when adding a new species, then why carry over to other types of leave without justification?

03.12.2015 15:17, Peter Khramov:

And that can not stand?

03.12.2015 14:04, Peter Khramov:

For users Insecta.pro - high entomological boxes (7.2 cm) at the price of conventional.

02.12.2015 23:26, Mihail Nyzhnikov:

I agree.
Uchtu!

02.12.2015 17:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectemnius / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

02.12.2015 16:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia niphonica / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

02.12.2015 15:48, Peter Khramov:

Transferred?

02.12.2015 15:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Scleropatrum hirtulum Opatrini.

02.12.2015 15:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes please)))

02.12.2015 15:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea klugii Euploea klugii erichsonii.

02.12.2015 14:49, Fedor Ovechkin:

Dmitri, have to do with the uniform №49330, because Photos in the same group.

02.12.2015 12:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

It seems, but let stand up to the sort, baking let him look. :)

02.12.2015 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&st=28200
View defined on molbiol.ru, Michael, it must be specified, otherwise it turns out not match. If you do not know who determined look personal data if there are no names, then specify in the comments of the author that this is defined in the resource, and then define the bet itself. :)

02.12.2015 11:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mihail Nyzhnikov Basil Sergienko.

02.12.2015 11:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mihail Nyzhnikov Basil Sergienko.

02.12.2015 11:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.12.2015 11:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago / Alex Dumchus Euploea phaenareta castelnaui / Male / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.12.2015 11:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago / Alex Dumchus Euploea phaenareta castelnaui / Male / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.12.2015 11:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago / Alex Dumchus Euploea klugii / Male / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.12.2015 11:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago / Alex Dumchus Euploea klugii erichsonii / Male / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.12.2015 11:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This male Euploea phaenareta castelnaui, subspecies said Fedor Ovechkin does not reach the Kra Isthmus (living north)

01.12.2015 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.12.2015 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.12.2015 10:12, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cyphocleonus dealbatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Adosomus roridus / Evgeny Komarov.

01.12.2015 10:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cyphocleonus dealbatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Adosomus roridus / Evgeny Komarov.

01.12.2015 10:10, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! ThisAdosomus roridus

01.12.2015 5:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Erebia niphonica Janson, 1877

30.11.2015 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Dime, tell it to the species / subspecies opredeleyaetsya?

30.11.2015 22:41, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euploea phaenareta drucei, male

30.11.2015 22:41, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euploea phaenareta drucei, male

30.11.2015 21:56, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euploea klugii erichsonii, male

30.11.2015 21:54, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euploea klugii erichsonii, male

30.11.2015 21:29, Irina Nikulina:

Cucullia lucifuga?

30.11.2015 21:28, Irina Nikulina:

Cucullia lactucae?

30.11.2015 21:26, Irina Nikulina:

Acronicta tridens?

30.11.2015 21:24, Irina Nikulina:

Acronicta psi?

30.11.2015 21:23, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Acronicta psi?

30.11.2015 21:22, Irina Nikulina:

Acronicta cuspis?

30.11.2015 21:10, Irina Nikulina:

I have seen hereHydraecia ultima, but still ask to see) (Figure apical part of the PC - blur external sling at cost. Edge, sharp corner postbazalnoy sling width of the outer zone near the bones are light + LC)

30.11.2015 18:42, Evgeny Komarov:

In what antiquity! :)

30.11.2015 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, in 2009, in the autumn, on molbiole, tormented by this bug :)
And you gave the verdict while the right :)

30.11.2015 16:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, I like you did not specify this photo? :)

30.11.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Komarov.

30.11.2015 13:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erebia / Alexandr Zhakov Erebia niphonica / Irina Nikulina.

30.11.2015 11:47, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, already discussed. If others do not, it is better such than no. And what would be better - a change.

30.11.2015 11:20, Irina Nikulina:

Erebia niphonica

30.11.2015 11:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.11.2015 11:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Without geography is not exactly happen. :(

30.11.2015 11:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera coleta / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.11.2015 10:18, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues, it makes sense to lay out here are the pictures: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/49272, http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/49270? Old pictures of small size for its own database. Eventually I peresnimu probably, but for now here are.

30.11.2015 1:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia lactucae / Andrey Ponomarev Cucullia lucifuga / Oleg Pekarsky.

30.11.2015 0:44, Irina Nikulina:

We need to move this photo toCucullia lucifuga, because It was in the group with http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/11198, which was overridden by Oleg Pekarsky with lactucae on lucifuga.

29.11.2015 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hedya nubiferana / Vitaly Gumenuk Hedya ochroleucana / Irina Nikulina.

29.11.2015 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hedya nubiferana / Nikolai Vladimirov Hedya ochroleucana / Irina Nikulina.

29.11.2015 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plagionotus floralis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

28.11.2015 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

The base of the transfer in a personal message :))

28.11.2015 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypomecis roboraria Ectropis crepuscularia.

28.11.2015 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ekaterina Popovitcheva Basil Sergienko.

28.11.2015 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia / Irina Nikulina Eupithecia exiguata / Ekaterina Popovitcheva.

28.11.2015 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Eupithecia intricata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

28.11.2015 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia / Irina Nikulina Pasiphila / Basil Sergienko.

28.11.2015 15:18, Irina Nikulina:

Thank You, Basil! Though a tribe not mistaken) With Pasiphila difficult of 5 coastal species not seen images subcinctata, as you wrote, that she is the closest to rectangulata (here only with some of its safe to assume). With excisa obscura and familiar images are only http://insects-seabassando.blogspot.ru/2015/06/blog-post_39.html, with chloerata - http://lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region= 1 & id = 68569

28.11.2015 14:34, Basil Sergienko:

It is not Eupithecia, and Pasiphila, it is necessary to see what is there

28.11.2015 14:24, Irina Nikulina:

Polypogon tentacularia

28.11.2015 14:18, Basil Sergienko:

Well, the first two disappear, but if it was July, it would be a couple satyrata / veratraria

28.11.2015 13:34, Irina Nikulina:

And there are doubts about the correct definition, I think, is ratherHedya ochroleucana

28.11.2015 13:28, Irina Nikulina:

ThereHedya ochroleucanamy opinion

28.11.2015 13:21, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, thank you. Did not write their assumptions, I have a complicated relationship with Eupithecia), but now look at the drafts, there addictata / subfuscata / intricata

28.11.2015 12:21, Basil Sergienko:

This would hold in their hands. Choosing a small, in my opinion, I am inclined to the first-intricata / satyrata

28.11.2015 12:18, Basil Sergienko:

exiguata

27.11.2015 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

27.11.2015 16:34, Ivan Tislenko:

Thank you! I did female.

27.11.2015 15:35, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

27.11.2015 15:34, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

27.11.2015 14:56, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, thank you!

27.11.2015 14:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nabidae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

27.11.2015 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cephaloon pallens.

27.11.2015 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Cryphaeus amurensis / Male.

27.11.2015 14:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Cephaloon pallens (Motsch., 1860)

27.11.2015 13:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Cryphaeus amurensis (Heyden, 1884)

27.11.2015 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Ostrinia / Irina Nikulina.

27.11.2015 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Hypomecis roboraria / Irina Nikulina.

27.11.2015 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Hypomecis roboraria / Irina Nikulina.

27.11.2015 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Ostrinia / Irina Nikulina.

27.11.2015 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Ostrinia / Irina Nikulina.

27.11.2015 12:44, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, thank you!

27.11.2015 11:30, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Approximately possible - bug-hunter (Nabidae).

26.11.2015 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Monochamus galloprovincialis / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2015 22:59, Peter Khramov:

One hundred years ago, it was defined as Bombus lapidarius. On fote not very visible, but the tip of the abdomen - red. Can anyone confirm / deny?

26.11.2015 22:54, Peter Khramov:

This car car car. Kara car car
Lord zhuchisty remind title. Just remember that the type is determined to!)

26.11.2015 22:50, Peter Khramov:

It is possible for this fote determine even approximately?

26.11.2015 22:18, Vladimir Deryabin:

Satyrium acaciae ?

26.11.2015 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithophane Lithophane ornitopus.

26.11.2015 13:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nicrophorus antennatus Nicrophorus interruptus.

26.11.2015 13:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Nicrophorus antennatus Nicrophorus interruptus.

26.11.2015 13:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.11.2015 13:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.11.2015 0:47, Irina Nikulina:

Lithophane ornitopus?

25.11.2015 22:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter Bruchela suturalis to put all and not only the year, there was not the author. I still try to limit yourself - you can not grasp the immensity, it is very much to edit. Better sequentially from one group to another. Now here in Carabus I stumbled on the problem: the site on which I rely very specifically treats subgenus Carabus (s.str.), Nothing to do with our experts and adopted by the existing system Zoological kind of online. I would be written off and possibly do something hybrid.

25.11.2015 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Said Eugene) Thank you.
Of course, I later poshamanil this specimen. (Glory to God in the collection and do not get out) and replace.
True quality of the mat. base that I can not guarantee (
Nevertheless, I will try.

25.11.2015 21:51, Peter Khramov:

If ph species on the site do not, it's not up to fat, have discussed many times before. Just I asked to know the reason for quality.

25.11.2015 21:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, wrote in a personal!

25.11.2015 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Small and difficult to capture. There are no bugs photogenic
By the way: a kind of rare even in their homeland, and quite a bit of his photos can be found in the internet.
Site lucky we can say;)

25.11.2015 20:40, Peter Khramov:

And he is that this small? Something amount of detail in the image is very small too.

25.11.2015 17:05, Peter Khramov:

About frames answered the phone. What appear to the boutiques - Old and lay out here, too.

25.11.2015 8:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Here on the site Ypthima sempera - subspecies Ypthima pandocus

25.11.2015 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pterophorus pentadactyla Lepidoptera.

25.11.2015 0:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Oleg Pekarsky.

25.11.2015 0:11, Irina Nikulina:

Determined Oleg Pekarskii

24.11.2015 23:43, Peter Khramov:

O. now realized. Fixed.

24.11.2015 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it is necessary to modify the field and "Synonyms and combinations of the generic" for them to ship directly to both versions.
Especially infa in this field is given to Latin and accordingly the drum to which version of her ship. "Latin, she and Africa Latin" :)

24.11.2015 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Well, people do write: -) Another thing is that for the collection of copies ought to write the time and place of fishing, not shooting.

24.11.2015 23:16, Peter Khramov:

By Ypthima sempera aquillius ...

24.11.2015 22:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Place "in the flat" floor, of course, right)))

24.11.2015 22:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and where portable?

24.11.2015 21:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Irina Nikulina Hypobarathra icterias / Oleg Pekarsky.

24.11.2015 21:53, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, for example, http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery?tx=%5B89%5D+Nolidae++%5BСемейство%5D&taxlev=all&prec=all&fem=0&author=1049&live=0&view=0&g=0&srch=приморский+край&size=s&perpage=100&order=dt The selection parameters introduced family Nolidae, to lower the photo was. The same story if input parameter any more of these things.

24.11.2015 21:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Eugene, this is better: Nikolaev GV Plastinchatousye beetles (Scarabaeoidea) in Kazakhstan and Central Asia. - Alma-Ata, Nauka, 1987. - 232 A bend elytra, alas, not a sign - it is more difficult, although G. aciculatus the only one in the former Soviet Union with a metallic sheen and is determined immediately. On your picture is not very clear.

24.11.2015 21:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

the price it $ 3 2,5))) about the scope to find out if you can

24.11.2015 21:47, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, it is, thanks to Oleg for definition. http://www.lepiforum.de/bh/personen/michel_kettner/Hypobarathra_icterias.jpg http://www.bioaltai-sayan.ru/regnum/pict-a/photo/Hypobarathra_icterias_fot.jpg

24.11.2015 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes I am for personal use, to such delays were not.
The machine does not have anything to drag. There are hands better and more accurately.
By the way, I pulled on the computer did not just base there, and the whole site entirely.
Surprisingly little space occupied on hard. In total some 261 mb. :)

24.11.2015 21:39, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the definition of the Old chtot not add the full. Fortunately CA usually quite indifferent to this issue. But in an amicable way, it would be necessary, kanesh.
Unbanal types - mean unbanal just for grandmas within, not surezno collections. Look range is commonly sold under the ...
Copies expensive - according to the supplier.Himself sushnyak not do, because I use a foreign infoy. If I remember correctly, it's about these http://store.insecta.pro/catalog/1998 pushes me as about the most expensive on the list.
About suvenirku - explained the other day, what and how. I was thinking bring, but for now do not deliver.
About sushnyak - itself hardly begin, but the site for those who want the opportunity and close up.Boom hope this thing also attract to the site of new active users, new data, etc.

24.11.2015 21:36, Eugene Davkaev:

UDC 595.764 (574)
GV Nikolaev, VL Kazenas, SV Kolov. Plastinchatousye beetles (a type of arthropod class of insects). A series of "Animals of Kazakhstan in the photographs." - Almaty: "Nur-Print", 2013. - 192 p. Circulation 100 copies. - Is on the Internet seems to have Shipunova.
On p. 90 Image Gymnopleurus mopsus - just a bend on the sides of the elytra.

24.11.2015 21:30, Peter Khramov:

Transferred?

24.11.2015 21:29, Peter Khramov:

Dim, pay attention - I forget the name change is defined for transfer.

24.11.2015 21:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.11.2015 21:28, Peter Khramov:

Transferred?

24.11.2015 21:27, Peter Khramov:

So it can not base on the PC, and drag to the site in its entirety. (Semi) automatic ...
Irina, throw off the link to the gallery, where there is always this image.

24.11.2015 20:49, Oleg Pekarsky:

Hypobarathra icterias (Eversmann, 1843)

24.11.2015 19:29, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Protoboarmia faustinata?

24.11.2015 18:16, Irina Nikulina:

I, too, of all the coastal Apamea wanted her to stay, but the color confused, never seen such bright. Moreover, this picture is not one.

24.11.2015 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae Pabulatrix pabulatricula.

24.11.2015 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergienko says is similar to theApamea scolopacina

24.11.2015 16:26, Irina Nikulina:

I GuessAcronicta major- this picture and the next 3

24.11.2015 16:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

24.11.2015 15:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sphenophorus abbreviatus Sphenophorus striatopunctatus.

24.11.2015 15:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Sphenophorus abbreviatus Sphenophorus striatopunctatus.

24.11.2015 14:16, Fedor Ovechkin:

Dmitri, the determination to species not mine!

24.11.2015 14:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Ypthima pandocus / Confidently identified Ypthima norma / Tentatively identified.

24.11.2015 13:50, Irina Nikulina:

GuessThalera chlorosaria

24.11.2015 13:49, Irina Nikulina:

Eupithecia abietaria?

24.11.2015 13:48, Irina Nikulina:

Ectropis excellens?

24.11.2015 13:48, Irina Nikulina:

Ectropis excellens?

24.11.2015 11:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ousley same wing of more than 17.5 mm it Ypthima watsoni (Moore, [1893]), but I doubt it

24.11.2015 11:31, Andrey Pavlov: This species is identified correctly.

24.11.2015 11:30, Andrey Pavlov: This species is identified correctly.

24.11.2015 11:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Let's go over the keys, can together handle)))
1 In the apical part of the bottom of the rear one eye
2 Bottom rear with two eyes in the first and second cells
3 The front wing is less than or more than 17 mm? That is the question)))
However, relying on the experience, I would say that it is still Y. norma

24.11.2015 10:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Let's just say - this type is interpreted by many as a subspecies Ypthima pandocus, but I would define (for Palawan in particular) as the Ypthima sempera aquillius Fruhstorfer, 1911 no other choice, because Philippine fauna poor members of this genus

24.11.2015 10:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is not Ypthima pandocus

24.11.2015 9:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema Eurema brigitta.

24.11.2015 9:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema Eurema brigitta.

24.11.2015 9:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hooray! Petr- krasava! Just look suvenirka- many butterfly species to be determined))) there is no way for original and found no where + themselves copies of which are significantly more expensive *))) This is a question is- is there to sell stock for suvenirku (without frame butterflies).Well, maybe it's time you start to deal with dry trees (only at normal prices)

24.11.2015 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Feast on my street :)
Cerambycidae org. rose.
Urgent pull themselves out on a computer database for the occasion)))

24.11.2015 5:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gymnopleurus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

24.11.2015 0:53, Irina Nikulina:

Peter found a bug - in my gallery has registered Photos Eugene. Sloboda http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/23134. There is a need for families to see and geography (only Primorye). Whatever the family is not specified in the parameter selection - all this gets CAST)

24.11.2015 0:14, Irina Nikulina:

On the RFE 3 types Moma - alpium, kolthoffi and tsushimana. Reliable different genitals. In the "Keys to the insects DDA" v.5. Part 4 of the external differences only the color specified patagy. On the Japanese site has found a reference to a golden brown color sling along the outer edge of the PC (as opposed to dark gray or alpium) and yellow-brown in the color of the upper side of the chest at the Moma kolthoffi. http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Moma_kolthoffi.html http://mushinavi.com/navi-insect/data-ga_kenmon_kikubigoma.htm butterfly RDV on our website exactly as defined to the photo allium and they are different from these three. I think that all three photosMoma kolthoffi.

23.11.2015 22:02, Irina Nikulina:

Assume that thisHeterarmia dissimilishttp://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Heterarmia_dissimilis.html only species of the genus listed in Sinev for 36 regions - H.buettneri. But there is recent data in the article EA Belyaev and AA Kuzmina "Zoograficheskaya characteristic fauna of moths Annunciation district (Amur Region, Russia) (Readings in memory A.I.Kurentsova Vol.XXVI, 2015) on the territory of the Annunciation district identified 247 species of moths, of which 188 - are for the first time for the area, 35 of them - are new to the Amur region, including Heterarmia dissimilis . (It does not indicate the place of shooting, but I think it Blagoveshchensk Blagoveshchensk or district, as in all other photos of Dina)

23.11.2015 21:53, Evgeny Komarov:

It is difficult to say for sure. As usual, unfortunately, in very small scale. Noticeable blue glitter on those copies, and if so, it is not mopsus, and G. aciculatus - not less common in southern Kazakhstan views. Eugene, you have great pictures in fotohudozhestvennom respect, but the identification is not always suitable.

23.11.2015 21:45, Vladimir Zryanin:

This is a working Camponotus maculatus, as other pictures of Hurghada

23.11.2015 21:39, Eugene Davkaev:

The couple Gymnopleurus mopsus?

23.11.2015 21:32, Eugene Davkaev:

Eugene, unfortunately other frames of these beetles there, and then I have them, of course, would be laid.

23.11.2015 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Aphantopus hyperantus / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Lasiommata petropolitana / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 19:29, Irina Nikulina:

Ostrinia sp.

23.11.2015 19:29, Irina Nikulina:

Ostrinia sp.

23.11.2015 19:28, Irina Nikulina:

Ostrinia sp.

23.11.2015 19:24, Irina Nikulina:

Hypomecis roboraria

23.11.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Simplicia schaldusalis / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.11.2015 19:13, Irina Nikulina:

Hypomecis roboraria

23.11.2015 18:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you, I think many will be defined.

23.11.2015 18:36, Irina Nikulina:

Lasiommata petropolitana

23.11.2015 18:24, Irina Nikulina:

Aphantopus hyperantus

23.11.2015 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Phyllonorycter / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Phyllonorycter / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Phyllonorycter / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Phyllonorycter / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Phyllonorycter / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Pterophoridae / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Pterophoridae / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Pterophoridae / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Agonopterix / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2015 14:50, Peter Khramov:

He Added. The only thing necessary to be even more precisely poperchenik measure. If there are changes - reported. And with the weight and length of all spelled correctly.

23.11.2015 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trigonoscelis muricata / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

23.11.2015 13:48, Peter Khramov:

Firstly, it is not assumed as a comment, and as a property of the taxon.
Second, the system is fundamentally not soggy. System crude for many private taxa. That's what you need to show people. Like, here, crude, because the work is not conducted, and nesyraya here, because everything is under control, but here in the process.Otherwise, it may think that we are satisfied and we are working on such a cheese level. And because nefig, like, decent people do here.
And this I would like to avoid.

23.11.2015 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Larentia clavaria / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

23.11.2015 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Larentia clavaria / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

23.11.2015 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.11.2015 10:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If you go - I do not think that because of the lack of commentary, and due to the fact that the system is at the root of the crude (and therefore the curve) and pass plenty of time until everything will fall into place BM))
Our goal is to provide. Each site has the same rights (including the newcomers).And if newcomers unfold and go means that they are expected to come on all gotovenkoe and do not see. In such a situation: to them and the road.
Nothing to worry about on this occasion.

23.11.2015 10:24, Peter Khramov:

Newcomers (some) unfold and go. I feel!

23.11.2015 6:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not necessary in this respect is no excess of those. kommentov city.
The fact that there are already enough.
And newcomers are confused? Already there are precedents?

23.11.2015 0:41, Irina Nikulina:

Pabulatrix pabulatricula?
In the Far East subspecies Pp fraudulenta (Staudinger, 1888)
http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=1610

22.11.2015 23:15, Peter Khramov:

There is a suspicion that it is necessary to clearly prescribe the status of taxa on the site: a curated, closely curated, processed / confirmed or horse is not lying. To the newcomers do not worry, if something goes wrong. What do you think?

22.11.2015 23:07, Peter Khramov:

In the near future I will add Old.

22.11.2015 21:42, Shamil Murtazin:

the tent (light traps) still do not have the size of the bag and there is no weight of the entire set.

22.11.2015 20:52, Andrei Humala: This species is identified correctly.

22.11.2015 19:12, Peter Khramov:

To stimulate further interest of entomologists - amateurs and professionals - to our site, we are opening a special online store, where Insecta.pro users can buy entomological equipment and supply on special conditions with reduced prices (and not Insecta.pro users can not buy at all). The store has following significant differences:
- Reduced prices for all products
- Higher priority worldwide delivery conditions and also at reduced prices or even free of charge (depending on the region and the status of the user)
- Only Insecta.pro users can buy at store.insecta.pro.

The size of the discount depends on the type of product.

Link to the store: http://store.insecta.pro. In order to buy something, you need to log in with the Insecta.pro username / password.

So, talking about the site Insecta.pro, you can now specify another advantage of working on it.

PS Unlike previous special offers, now with the new store arriving, reviews about products are optional. But please be decent and don't be lazy to write these same reviews - help other users to choose Insecta.pro.

22.11.2015 19:12, Peter Khramov:

.

22.11.2015 13:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

Lestes viridis

22.11.2015 1:14, Irina Nikulina:

In support there is one (but not sharp) picture the same butterfly with HCC, the colors that are typical for this type of wing, as it were divided into two quite contrasting colored part http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/51_Tortricidae/5001%20Tortricinae/500104_Archips/50010403_Archips_ingentanus_0090/Archips_ingentanus.htm

22.11.2015 1:08, Irina Nikulina:

I think here the femaleArchips ingentanus http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/51_Tortricidae/5001%20Tortricinae/500104_Archips/50010403_Archips_ingentanus_0090/Archips_ingentanus_010725632.jpg http://moth2001.web.fc2.com/3-136.html
Revised 15 species of coastal Archips, find all pictures of males, females - are not found two species, so she did not dare to put in inaccurate ingentanus.

21.11.2015 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My long is ((
Although there is hope.
As it turned out, both the domain zaregalsya per person :)
Carabidae. org: https://www.nic.ru/whois/?query=http%3A%2F%2Fcarabidae.org%2F
Cerambycidae. org: https://www.nic.ru/whois/?query=http%3A%2F%2Fcerambycidae.org%2F
That's just me, they just seemed like such :)

21.11.2015 23:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Hooray! My site is earned after 8-9 hours - the panic was unfounded. Hope and Basil will be OK!

21.11.2015 20:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues! And I have similar to "lay down" carabidae.org! What a fack? You can do, but the headache through the roof.

21.11.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Erotylidae Erotylina maculiventris.

21.11.2015 16:48, Irina Nikulina:

Peter wrote under the photo, as an explanation of why it stopped in this form of the three friends. I collect and transfer to the form later (but pages with -us and -a need to combine)

21.11.2015 16:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.11.2015 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Irina, in the description of the species would be this info ...

21.11.2015 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Adela reaumurella / Zoran Bozovic.

21.11.2015 12:05, Irina Nikulina:

Features that distinguish this species from close arcuella and subtillana, also living in Primorye - on the PC in the median field has only 3 sequins in black spot and there is always sparkles between this spot and the dorsal edge of the wing vein of A 2 + 3

21.11.2015 11:52, Irina Nikulina:

In Primorye, about 18-20 species Nemophora, images 4-5-minute unlikely to get found online, and have a group of species, outwardly similar to theNemophora staudingerella, for example, bellela, karafutonis, lapikella, amatella. So, perhaps, be it in a certain kind to, or can, as in the case http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/10769 put in imprecisely defined to staudingerella (MG Ponomarenko identified such as the butterfly Nemophora < strong> cf staudingerella)

21.11.2015 11:47, Irina Nikulina:

All 4 types Athrips, living in Primorye looked.

21.11.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

21.11.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

21.11.2015 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

21.11.2015 10:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomela populi / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.11.2015 10:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysomela populi / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.11.2015 10:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Leiopus / Nikolai Vladimirov Leiopus linnei / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.11.2015 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, of course handles everything and combs.
Without this we can not even long and tedious.
We have each "abandoned" native to deal separately.
Example is almost ready subfamily (cut from what was on the site): http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/191474
Here is an example still not ready family (work rose): http: // insecta.pro / ru / taxonomy / 840,777
There's a bunch of orphan childbirth and all that is necessary to make out on the shelves + each genus name the author and year of description :)
And this situation in almost every taxon Zhuchin older species. Understand and deal .......................
In this work they rule 3 factors:
1) Adequate sources.2) Head
3) Hands
Regarding usachinogo site: I think the same will fall into place all the time (if indeed there bekapnu system for personal needs) :)
There is still the owner of a fairly serious person and a known zhuchist: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Баршевский,_Арвид
And do not get up - I'll find out (personally know one of the admins, write there system) that with this website.Break through :)
.

21.11.2015 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

21.11.2015 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.11.2015 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.11.2015 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.11.2015 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.11.2015 3:24, Peter Khramov:

Wow, how amusing. Yandex individual positions turn up. Vasily, thank you have on this case. Who closed the show individual posts.
Regarding kermbitsid not have to pull the page, and the tree taxa, if it is there is good. Vassily, really you just hand everything you scratch? Or the differences are not so much?

21.11.2015 3:24, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female

21.11.2015 3:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female

21.11.2015 3:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female

21.11.2015 3:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female

21.11.2015 3:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female

21.11.2015 1:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter noticed such a thing.
Your Message of this essentially closed threads easily indexed by Yandex.
THOSE. displayed when the search query.
Example: http://insecta.pro/ru/community/44113
Searches were: http://www.yandex.ru/yandsearch?clid=9582&text=cerambycidae.org (where the fourth link above led to my post on 04.10.2015 12:12).
This with this theme should not be. If it is possible - to close that hole.And then it turns nekuzyavo: Messages from the theme, if desired, can be found and read by anyone Yandex (((

20.11.2015 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Leiopus / Nikolai Vladimirov Leiopus linnei / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.11.2015 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I know, Alexander. At most there are some downloaded.
There is also a program for mirroring: http://www.httrack.com/
On this website just do not think (
And it weighs a lot, I think: the base there is still capacious (worldwide). Time and place of banal pity on hard drives.
Wait: I think will work. These sites should not be like that go to waste)))

20.11.2015 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.11.2015 23:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

I, too, is not working. In the future, when we need to write will work site, I downloaded some. And without neta work.

20.11.2015 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dorcadion holosericeum / Confidently identified / Dmitry Vtorushin.

20.11.2015 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, while the older taxa are seen only synonymous, Distribution and General Description. None of this does not fit to the species. Yes, and supraspecific subsidiary also do not see how ... Or how about you do not?

20.11.2015 21:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, too, but these things need to be implemented, and thus the presentation of data should be also good to think of, as well as their structure.
More thought came - do inherit a set of fields from the older taxon. Then the primary set of fields is applicable to all tree, and then your hands to register the missing fields tribes, childbirth, etc.

20.11.2015 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Colias / Fedor Ovechkin.

20.11.2015 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Colias / Fedor Ovechkin.

20.11.2015 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eurema / Fedor Ovechkin.

20.11.2015 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eurema / Fedor Ovechkin.

20.11.2015 19:18, Fedor Ovechkin:

Colias

20.11.2015 19:18, Fedor Ovechkin:

Colias

20.11.2015 19:11, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eurema

20.11.2015 19:10, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eurema

20.11.2015 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Silphidae / Eugene Davkaev Silpha tristis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.11.2015 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Silphidae / Eugene Davkaev Silpha tristis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.11.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.11.2015 17:46, Peter Khramov:

Now I, too, does not plow.

20.11.2015 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lord, as you have this resource functions: http://cerambycidae.org/?
The trouble is that I rely combing family Cerambycidae on him.
And then he lay down on my days ......
This is still some sadness: got all the work (((
And there is the most adequate system for them ....
Panico ((

20.11.2015 15:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Passalidae / Confidently identified Aceraius grandis / Tentatively identified.

20.11.2015 14:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

20.11.2015 13:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mylabris Mylabris variabilis.

20.11.2015 12:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female.

20.11.2015 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Almost double Photo # 15957.

20.11.2015 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Nikolai Vladimirov Argyresthia goedartella / Andrey Ponomarev.

20.11.2015 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yponomeutidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Argyresthia goedartella / Andrey Ponomarev.

20.11.2015 11:05, Andrey Ponomarev:

Argyresthia goedartella

20.11.2015 11:04, Andrey Ponomarev:

Argyresthia goedartella

20.11.2015 10:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mycterus tibialis Mycterus curculioides.

20.11.2015 10:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Leptopterna Leptopterna dolabrata.

20.11.2015 8:29, Shamil Murtazin:

Determining the type flied up for some reason ...

20.11.2015 1:58, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, it's not how it will look into the internal structure of matter. Registration - it is always possible to change.
Eugene, I agree, but that's a manual selection. Ugh ... Well it's not only the family, there is a set of taxa will need to be processed manually ...

19.11.2015 23:29, Fedor Ovechkin:

Campsomeris

19.11.2015 23:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

Campsomeris

19.11.2015 23:17, Fedor Ovechkin:

Campsomeris

19.11.2015 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

19.11.2015 22:05, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blaps / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

19.11.2015 20:37, Evgeny Komarov:

For supraspecific taxa separate field for synonyms should be unique. The spread is also likely, but the characteristics of the taxon with any other - can be one. Illustrate five to seven (if any) representatives. Here it is better handled since you must choose the one hand characteristic species / genera ... and on the other to show variability.

19.11.2015 19:12, Shamil Murtazin:

As an option to make all the fields common to all, since they are not visible (and the implementation of the database will be easier). And for editing mark "necessary" for this type of field or an asterisk in the frame to take them. In general, graphically highlight (still possible to group all the fields on top of the page).

19.11.2015 18:43, Peter Khramov:

Aleksndr, an example of empty and non-empty, you can see straight right now at least have the same butterflies. Meaning that the fields are not visible and does not interfere with the form on the page. They can only be seen on the page editing.
Regarding supraspecific - I agree, it is necessary to do, and the narrative of the gallery and a link to the full (or partially take foty there).The text - one window do all or some sub-division is necessary, albeit more modest than for the species?
ZY Well, what do you think, do all the fields common to all insects, or even dressed the same and some are specific to certain taxa?

19.11.2015 18:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Acleris ?

19.11.2015 16:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Shamil Murtazin Calvia decemguttata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.11.2015 16:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Shamil Murtazin Calvia decemguttata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.11.2015 16:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Shamil Murtazin Calvia decemguttata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.11.2015 16:20, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Adalia bipunctata / Evgeny Komarov.

19.11.2015 14:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Shamil Murtazin Anatis ocellata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.11.2015 14:26, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Shamil Murtazin Anatis ocellata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.11.2015 14:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Shamil Murtazin Anatis ocellata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.11.2015 11:07, Zoran Bozovic:

This is the same moth as 48491 to 49485. Flash lighting was the same but moth's scales reflect light
according to Its orientation.

19.11.2015 7:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Carterocephalus silvicola (Meigen, 1829) I guess.

18.11.2015 23:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

no, do not know)))

18.11.2015 16:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Camponotus / Nikolai Vladimirov Camponotus maculatus / Vladimir Zryanin.

18.11.2015 16:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Camponotus / Nikolai Vladimirov Camponotus maculatus / Vladimir Zryanin.

18.11.2015 16:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Camponotus / Nikolai Vladimirov Camponotus maculatus / Vladimir Zryanin.

18.11.2015 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Dim, well, you know that it is on the website under Product fully working, right?))

18.11.2015 15:24, Vladimir Zryanin:

It's Camponotus maculatus soldier.

18.11.2015 15:23, Vladimir Zryanin:

Here, too, a fine work, but filled with a paunch.

18.11.2015 15:22, Vladimir Zryanin:

All images marked Camponotus sp. from Hurghada (Egypt), different workers subkasty Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) maculatus (Fabricius, 1782). Here, the fine work.

18.11.2015 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Peter Khramov Tachinidae / Yuri Semejkin.

18.11.2015 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Eugene Davkaev Tachina / Fedor Ovechkin.

18.11.2015 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Eugene Davkaev Tachina / Fedor Ovechkin.

18.11.2015 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Eugene Davkaev Tachina / Fedor Ovechkin.

18.11.2015 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Eugene Davkaev Tachina / Fedor Ovechkin.

18.11.2015 10:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thanks.

18.11.2015 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry Catch: https://yadi.sk/d/XqyHuBAccX7Wd

18.11.2015 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hyponephele lupinus / Female / Eugene Davkaev Chazara briseis / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

18.11.2015 10:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

It's to move according to the author's identification.

18.11.2015 10:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tachina

18.11.2015 10:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tachina

18.11.2015 10:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tachina

18.11.2015 10:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tachina

18.11.2015 9:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Comrades! Give a link to the directory where the blue of rock !!!

18.11.2015 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

A. Kupyanskaya confirms identification of the species as Camponotus japonicus.

18.11.2015 7:50, Alexander Belousov:

Chazara briseis ♂ it is!

18.11.2015 7:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Chazara briseis or something like that I guess.

18.11.2015 7:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Why, there's even another tribe. Alexander wakes up, he tells.

18.11.2015 6:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geotrupes stercorarius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.11.2015 6:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Transferred to the form according to the definition of the author.
Only in my opinion it is not her way.

18.11.2015 6:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hyponephele lupinus / Confidently identified / Female / Eugene Davkaev.

18.11.2015 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Curculionidae / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

18.11.2015 6:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhocoris apterus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.11.2015 22:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, this is, if the search is not immediately found an option that suits and you have to move on (popped up several dozens of identical names of different taxa, and the seeker can not choose). You press again to go to the search box to the left and now there if a second press in the search box in 90-100% of cases take off in english.Simply put, the search in the secondary (left or use the search box on the "search portal entomological Insecta.pro" leads directly to the English version.

17.11.2015 21:54, Peter Khramov:

From the results - it should not. If repeated, write exactly from what always it happens or not.
Regarding the double dogs - check.

17.11.2015 21:51, Peter Khramov:

Yes, notice and mailing an email - in the priority plans. Without Email this now all you can watch in the section of the Community "your subscription."

17.11.2015 21:49, Evgeny Komarov:

In the non-Russian version of the site sends regularly, especially from the search.

17.11.2015 21:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Something thought to offer this type: make notice that under your photos left a comment. Often See photos and the question arises, who would like to ask the author. Not always a good idea to use drugs.

17.11.2015 21:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, please check the time that the link generated in the double dogs refers to non-Russian version of the site. Those. in a way no "directory" "ru".

17.11.2015 21:15, Irina Nikulina:

Cucullia artemisiae? (this and the next 3 pictures)

17.11.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.11.2015 20:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander, Peter really discussed and came to a mutual understanding of the situation with the "diagnosis-description". At least I now understand it this way. Can even the example of my favorite ground beetles.Would and will do so probably (when the time is there):
Option 1 - "Well differs from all species (most likely have to specify the region because of the fauna of the former Soviet Union are not the information is not at all, and it can be just is not important) to (brief listing of the important features). The length of the body .... The body color can (can not) be varied ...A characteristic feature is the (listing the most important features). "
Option 2 (the most common) - "Externally similar to that occurring in the same territory (perechilenie related species with the" dogs "). The type A is different .... from different species .... In order to distinguish this species and species C and D is required to study the genital apparatus (male / female).Then again, size, color, etc. which introduces significant according to the information. "
It is here in the first approximation, I imagine.Links to sources or your own opinion / knowledge required, just as it is done without undue difficulty?
A further question to Peter and to all "on filling" "Why we do not give birth and other characteristics supraspecific taxa?" About the lack of generic synonyms mentioned here, but in fact there is nothing!It can (and should) at least give ranges of birth, the number of species. For Peter meditation one more thing: I really like that carabidae.org open any supraspecific taxa and see photos of his representatives. Example: http://carabidae.org/taxa/anthiinae-bonelli-1813. It is very informative.
About the type locality information should be entered, if it is. Empty fields are not criminals.I think that we ultimately have much more serious about descriptions (completely absent and not provided) supraspecific taxa (genera, families).
This whole argument on a given topic is quite "raw". All of us here at entuazizme, so you need to minimize the time spent on such things, but do them as possible without schlock.I tried to find the lowest cost option. Even though this will be "minimally expensive" only for the person who owns a decent group.
Well, about "empty" fields. It's okay not to see - will be an information or an expert - is full. Of course, if filled with 2-3 percent, it will be cool.

17.11.2015 19:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

In-in, to show an example of the full and empty. :)

17.11.2015 17:39, Peter Khramov:

We discussed. It turns out that there is no reason not to make the possibility of entering of information for the diagnosis, and the type locality for the etymology. And if the data is not present, then there is no emptiness certainly will not take too much space ...

17.11.2015 15:18, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Planolinus vittatus Eudolus quadriguttatus.

17.11.2015 14:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cheilotrichia imbuta Phoridae.

17.11.2015 12:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colias / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

17.11.2015 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

17.11.2015 12:16, Fedor Ovechkin:

AlsoColias, but the group should be separated, because different instances.

17.11.2015 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sericomyia silentis / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

17.11.2015 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.11.2015 11:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Eugene Davkaev Carabus cancellatus / Evgeny Komarov.

17.11.2015 11:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Eugene Davkaev Carabus cancellatus / Evgeny Komarov.

17.11.2015 10:46, Fedor Ovechkin:

Photo identified and can be moved.

17.11.2015 10:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, like take care of the Madotrogus, genus and species (one is) added. Further, there is very voyuy.

17.11.2015 10:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Madotrogus kirgisicus.

17.11.2015 8:37, Evgeny Komarov:

The correct spelling of the species name Madotrogus kirgisicus (Semenov, 1895) - Check for Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera - Volume 3, 2006.

17.11.2015 1:42, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, I'll call you tomorrow at the phone and discuss. Here, for the time being with the deaf-blind poluchaetstsa ...

17.11.2015 0:03, Evgeny Komarov:

"And there's nothing wrong with that, to return to the Identification keys."
Peter, how do you imagine it? The current description of the species takes on average somewhere in half an A4 page (without illustrations, which, as a rule, necessary for understanding the described symptoms).Move to the site all the available literature? But imagine a "useful" description is the same repetitive kinds of ground beetles, etc. I somehow can not. It's like my favorite question: "Evgeny! But a black beetle with six legs and two antennae, who is this?"

16.11.2015 23:44, Vladimir Zryanin:

Diagnosis default item differential. This means that for a particular type must be brought precisely features for which it can be identified among related species.

16.11.2015 23:39, Peter Khramov:

Alexander:
1. Why do you believe that the picture is?
2. And even if there is, why would it on it (they) must be seen all the signs?
3. And even if even seen, arrows can be displayed (even if they do and pogorodit srelochki) differences between two-three species. And it happens that one must be and more.Eugene:
Descriptions are needed there and that they were helpful. And there's nothing wrong with that, to return to the Identification keys.
Externally similar species we found in the field of diagnosis. But to their list of conclusions do not need a gun box, and separate formal sign.

16.11.2015 23:34, Evgeny Komarov:

I agree with Alexander about the description of the "appearance". The right size, yes. And as far as these are the most common "description" formal and useless, it is possible to evaluate the descriptions of species in the Red Book. Under most of these descriptions can be a hundred kinds of fit.Well might look like to describe, say, a couple of hundred species of ground beetles of the genus Harpalus? They are in the vast majority apparently little distinguishable. Describe the number of Seta-bearing long, especially punctures ...? So we are back again to the Identification keys :) Yes, and there are no keys BM full even for Russia.But in this regard, discussions had an idea to make the field, which indicates outwardly similar views. Here it might be helpful.

16.11.2015 23:23, Evgeny Komarov:

I was just about this - for the species / subspecies of supervisors should be, and scientific editor is the "top" comb and point to mistakes / shortcomings.

16.11.2015 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why describe the appearance, if there is a picture? But the size is necessary, as there is no line :)

16.11.2015 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Well, then work all over. Why is it more than others? He does not have all the subspecies of all taxa prolazit, he has a bird's-eye look at all the issues that arise on the site of the research.

16.11.2015 23:13, Peter Khramov:

This is where one field for synonyms and subspecies? We do not have this.
About the diagnosis and details of appearance - photos of this Old replace unrealistic. Where fl kind to sketch in the species did not exist to describe the appearance?

16.11.2015 22:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, I also do not like that for synonyms and subspecies we somehow have one field general. It should be divided.

16.11.2015 22:38, Evgeny Komarov:

2. It is necessary if there is information!
3. It is not necessary
4. It is necessary to think in pictures and that's another thing, where many photographers competent entomologists (including fans) gather in order to illustrate the differences. In fact, few actual implement. Or have theses of attributive tables enter.
6. Biology in a broad sense (i.e.including preferred habitats, food plants for herbivores, and so on. - Whatever that is).
8. It is not necessary to allocate, as it was important primarily for Lepidoptera, combined with 6.
9 and 10. Looking Russian (if accepted) and is similar to English. I think that the Arab, Greek, Chinese will not specify.
Prshelsya only on controversial issues (paragraphs.It is necessary to do already, and then when the plant anything other than Lepidoptera, information is added to nowhere!

16.11.2015 22:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I would categorically osterёgsya refer these specimens to C. splendens. For the taxonomy of the genus is very confusing; for the region indicated several "types" (?), the symptoms of which are not entirely clear; urgently needed revision.

The same applies to several adjacent images.

16.11.2015 22:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

2-3 Let it be
4. In the picture comes to all and in different languages ​​equally (arrows indicate where the differences). Size is mandatory.
9-10 probably yes.

16.11.2015 22:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! It is not even discussed! If the competent entomologist will take up this matter, I am both hands! But here ... it works!

16.11.2015 22:22, Peter Khramov:

Irina, removed.
The people understand it correctly, that the question nauchreda site all deeply poserdtsu? ..

16.11.2015 22:20, Peter Khramov:

2. Why not?
3. Why not?
4. Oh it? Tea is not a primer.
8. So what that part. It's about whether or not The beaten in a separate section for easy reading of the information.
9. Why do we need the name of the Greek to the moment when there will be a Greek version of the site?

16.11.2015 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

1. Full name (synonyms, generic combination raznopisanie (change endings), mistakes in the names in the literature, under what name this type in the literature)
2 Do I have to?
3. Do I have to?
4. In the pictures :)
5. Yes.
6. Biology (Ecology is another)
7.Da.
8. This part of the 6.
9. Da. different languages
10. 9 cm.

16.11.2015 22:02, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, clean, please by http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery?size=sm&sp=994628 and http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery?size=sm&sp=866206 These are no second photo, and they I have long been hanging in my LC, while illustrating all the time bumping)

16.11.2015 21:53, Peter Khramov:

When the site was just butterflies, you can use a single set of fields for all kinds of (distribution, time volley, Forage plants, etc.) Now that the site has a variety of insects, obviously, to be a universal set of fields that are relevant to all (or the vast majority) plus species (obsuzhdaemo) specific fields that appear only for some of them. I propose to discuss here both sets.The question is not only to the curators of groups (at least to them in the first place), but to all users of the website.

list of the basic fields for all kinds of insects is seen as follows:
1. Synonyms (synonyms, generic combinations, etc.)
2. The types of terrain
3. Etymology
4. Diagnosis / appearance. Variability. Differences from similar appearances
5.Geographical distribution
6. Environment (here it is supposed to transfer the information from the fields to the butterflies' flight of Time "and" Life Time caterpillars "," hibernating stage ", and these abolish field)
7. Additional Information
8. Information on the immature stages
9. The local name (in Russian)
10.The local name (English)

Also sovstava basic fields are invited to discuss whether they should complement specific to individual taxa (eg, description of different castes in social insects, a separate field for forage plants caterpillars butterflies, etc.) All make it into the framework of the already mentioned, the basic sections / fields.

ZYIt should be noted that in addition to extended information identifying the sources and formal features in species essays is supposed to make kratom section descriptions (created by users like curators or administrative group), where,osvnoe on extended data is a short textual description of the form (its basic properties, interesting features, unlike other). Those. all 3 levels of the data obtained:
1. A brief text description (drawn up by one person or a group connected with each other collaborators)
2. Formal features (numbers listed, and arrows)
3.Details of the sources of information on which claims are made. 1 and 2.

16.11.2015 21:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.11.2015 21:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lasius umbratus / Nikolai Vladimirov Chthonolasius / Vladimir Zryanin.

16.11.2015 20:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Camponotus / Nikolai Vladimirov Camponotus maculatus / Vladimir Zryanin.

16.11.2015 20:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Camponotus / Nikolai Vladimirov Camponotus maculatus / Vladimir Zryanin.

16.11.2015 20:30, Vladimir Zryanin:

This small working Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) maculatus (Fabricius, 1782)

16.11.2015 20:24, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Phoridae

16.11.2015 20:09, Vladimir Zryanin:

This photo male Camponotus (Tanaemyrmex) maculatus (Fabricius, 1782). Kind is very common in Egypt.

16.11.2015 19:59, Vladimir Zryanin:

I agree that the view from the group Formica rufa. Belonging to F. polyctena this snapshot can not be established.

16.11.2015 19:56, Vladimir Zryanin:

In this type of shot can be determined in the best case to the subgenus Chthonolasius. This female may belong as a species L. umbratus, and L. mixtus. The latter seems more likely due to the complete lack of hair separated (at least, they are not visible in the photo).

16.11.2015 19:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Madotrogus kirghisicus (Semenov, 1895)

16.11.2015 17:58, Evgeny Komarov:

:)

16.11.2015 17:46, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Eugene, your professional resume only finally pushed me to the pleasant solution - starting from next summer have only environmentally friendly products already in the public get the number :) If you consider that just outside the huge monastery garden, which is terrible to say how many years, the .. .do not want to deal with a fool's errand)) Well ... maybe periodically pobryzgivat tomato extract to clean conscience and maintain that same faith in effect and in what folk remedies work))

16.11.2015 16:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Eugene Davkaev Carabus cancellatus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.11.2015 16:58, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Eugene Davkaev Carabus cancellatus / Evgeny Komarov.

16.11.2015 16:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes forgot to say that in the laboratories at the mills are not hothouse grown entomophages for pest gardens / gardens gardeners - there is a specific set of not usable in the country :)

16.11.2015 16:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, my two cents in something again. All written Irina, especially in the chemical methods is not absolutely true, thatremoval (burning, burying) of fallen leaves in autumn, the removal of fruit drop (during the season), and removal of the fall from the trees for some reason not leafless leaves (there are usually overwintering stages of pests are waiting for spring); whitewashing, cleaning cracks on trunks and other. But again, if you are on your 6-12 acres are doing everything perfect and your neighbors do not have ...We get the monkey work.
As for treatments to trees bud - is valid only against the eggs of mites and San Jose scale, which in Moscow is not and never will be.Against the absolute majority of the pests of fruit insecticide treatment is carried out before flowering, but buds, and apples - after petal fall (against moth). Said Irina drugs are outdated even then, when I was engaged in cottage itself, ie 15-20 years. What to use - the network has everything, includingannually publishes the Official Handbook of permitted pesticides. Here in 2015 http://www.pesticidy.ru/ps-content/literature/files/Государственный_каталог_2015_2743_instructions.pdf.
Now again about the biological protection methods.All very nice in words, but in reality for suburban areas the effect can be only when all over the garden partnership (array) of large area All things at once and correctly, then it is possible for something to say, although the efficiency is very low and work biologics only in years LOW populations of pests.Effect of biological control have indoors (greenhouses, as produced by parasites, predators anywhere these greenhouses can not crawl / fly). In the open field effect is miniscule and does not pay the costs. By all the laws in the wild predator / parasite grows only after when the increasing number of casualties.No fodder - fertility and reduced numbers of predators, is - increased, but after a number of victims grew by order and apples bye-bye :).Well, you will get entomophages in biological laboratory at the greenhouse complex, but what's next? Why is it in your garden plot to linger? If it was full of their victims, certainly linger, but the train has left something - and in nature so arranged that never predator / parasite does not kill its own food base.And if the predators there still nothing to eat - will fly / upolzut / kick the bucket.
The wormwood and other folk remedies I will not say all this to a greater degree of myths and who want to see the effect he sees it.The young fruit arrays can be for some time without pesticides and receive a high quality crop, and old-growth (if you have a young garden, and around 10-15 with three more years of planting, the age of your site has no value) or use 2-3 times per season insecticides / fungicides / acaricide and get BMa decent crop, or consume organic products, but in small quantities. That something like that from my experience and summer resident (in the past) and a specialist in defense.

16.11.2015 15:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil added photos Madotrogus kirghisicus (these taxa in any status is not found) and he did not add anything to the Scarabaeidae - once you're there to put in order. I tried to find the "ends" in Rhizotrogini and realized that there is still a horse is not lying :)

16.11.2015 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, like no doubt.

16.11.2015 13:43, Peter Khramov:

Ok, we will discuss the situation with Stas and poreshat question.

16.11.2015 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, this kind - Polyommatus rueckbeili, to which the curator put subspecies khamul Korb, 2009 on our website is present as a subspecies Polyommatus juldusa - http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/51427. In order not to create two of the same taxon at the rank of one kind and another in the rank of subspecies, it is necessary to raise the rank of sub-species to species (once daily curator thinks so). If not, then subspecies multiplied by 0 and create a new look.new subspecies :)

16.11.2015 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta Acronicta adaucta.

16.11.2015 11:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Scarabaeidae / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Calamosternus granarius / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Eugene and accomplish your goal already in the public topic, what else can anyone say, and that is what we the system area a ...

15.11.2015 22:57, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Nikolai Vladimirov Olibrus bicolor / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 22:11, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Nikolai Vladimirov Olibrus bicolor / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 22:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Most Scleropatrum.

15.11.2015 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.11.2015 20:58, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Acronicta adaucta? http://szmn.sbras.ru/picts/Heterocera/Noct/Acronicta_adaucta.htm (there were doubts about jozana)

15.11.2015 20:53, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Scopula superior? http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.8_Sterrhinae/2267Scopula/2292Scopula_superior/D.JPG But we need a specialist opinion.

15.11.2015 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindela songorica.

15.11.2015 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cicindela songorica.

15.11.2015 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

ulula it?

15.11.2015 20:17, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, thanks for poyasnenie..Vyhodit, nothing tormented annually fitoverm sorts and it is not necessary to communicate with them?) What would a professional? Chemistry is not exactly save the neighbors on both sides do nothing at all and will not be .. (

15.11.2015 20:16, Peter Khramov:

Anatoliy that tell about the date?

15.11.2015 20:16, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, and insecticides are relevant now that Irina listed or to add something, as long as you have this specialization?

15.11.2015 20:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Melitaea ala / Evgeny Komarov Melitaea sibina / Alexander Belousov.

15.11.2015 20:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Melitaea ala / Evgeny Komarov Melitaea sibina / Alexander Belousov.

15.11.2015 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Ok, Ponil, thank you!

15.11.2015 20:10, Evgeny Komarov:

I, in this case, even I will not argue - this stuff I did not specify, and will not, therefore confidence Alexander. In this group, the impression many professionals, so many opinions :).

15.11.2015 20:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter must for its part regarding pest control (second specialty, however), said that biological control only works indoors, and certainly not in the summer (homestead) areas. Those.Flash is no any harmful species - everything is OK and you can do without chemistry, but when mass reproduction - alas, only insecticides, if not willing to put up with a worm-eaten apple and the loss of 30-50% of the crop. Moreover, and chemistry in a suburban array is not a panacea - you're doing everything correctly and efficiently, and the neighbors do not.As a result, the effect of your struggle is low or the number of treatments exceed all reasonable limits .. That something like that.

15.11.2015 19:58, Evgeny Komarov:

I got it!

15.11.2015 19:58, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, about entomophages added by Yurina request. In fact, good advice. I lit up the idea of ​​guys last summer, dragged half a tin of ladybirds as aphid attacked)) was a feast)) Well, riders must not be excessive in the garden.

15.11.2015 19:48, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, you still tell that it is necessary to protect and attract insects -entomofagov)) Yura wrote here about this http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42125
Itself has not yet tried, but few have studied this issue and collect nests wintering larvae in the period from the end of the autumn leaf fall before bud break in the spring, store them until spring in the bank.Spring Bank closes fine mesh. From banks apantelesy fly and feed themselves without the caterpillars die. I read that the exact same simple way to deal with ringed moth - collecting eggs of a fall before bud break (wintering eggs). Walls are cut off, placed in a tank, in early spring cages are put in the sun.Hatched caterpillars die, and parasitic insects which fly over the net. Said insect - entomophages you can even buy a large number of islands in the biological laboratories greenhouses at mills

15.11.2015 19:46, Peter Khramov:

Eugene now the system only seems a non-illustrated machine types. Supraspecific taxa - do not. Moreover, now it is impossible to illustrate supraspecific taxa unless proillyustirovan form (supraspecific taxa illustrated views and fotoy instead fotoy as such).At this stage it seems to have wrong, but first I need to correct the situation in software, and then Irina (or me as) illustrate supraspecific taxa, which are not illustrated species.

15.11.2015 19:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Irina, the genus Lindrothius have confidence to a certain kind of photo http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/45061, and the genus is not illustrated!

15.11.2015 19:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Anisodactylus Anisodactylus nemorivagus.

15.11.2015 19:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Do not minor, rather it Pterostichus (Phonias) strenuus (Panzer, 1796), but can not see a number of signs, the size of the photo is not appreciated therefore 100%.

15.11.2015 19:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Pterostichus / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Pterostichus strenuus / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 19:07, Peter Khramov:

Irina, thank you very much for your detailed comment, give info, see what happens next season.

15.11.2015 19:05, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, do you agree with Alexander?

15.11.2015 19:03, Peter Khramov:

Relatives were asked to find out ...

15.11.2015 19:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Zabrus tenebrioides - tremendous rarity for Moscow region (the northern boundary of the range).

15.11.2015 18:59, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Zabrus tenebrioides / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 18:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Amara majuscula / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 18:41, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

15.11.2015 18:37, Stan Korb:

Polyommatus rueckbeili gorthaur

15.11.2015 18:34, Stan Korb:

This kind of Polyommatus rueckbeili. I do not know who was "most databases," and see whether the drafters of the types of these taxa, but so far from iphigenia juldusa-rueckbeili-kirgisorum, that there are doubts about their competence. I researched all types of taxa in this group, and in the nature of work with them. juldusa - a fan of wet habitats, rueckbeili - xerophyte, but still occurs frequently in the alpine zone.

15.11.2015 18:29, Stan Korb:

I can not tolerate ...

15.11.2015 17:06, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Amara fulva / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 17:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Carabidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Bembidion obliquum / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 16:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Bembidion obliquum Sturm 1825.

15.11.2015 16:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Rhopalapion longirostre / Vladimir Bryukhov Apionidae / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 16:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Apionidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Rhopalapion longirostre / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 16:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Rhopalapion longirostre / Vladimir Bryukhov Apionidae / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 16:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Apionidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Rhopalapion longirostre / Evgeny Komarov.

15.11.2015 14:28, Irina Nikulina:

Why only caterpillars, Peter?) Oh poison - so the whole fraternity) on apple trees at least 10 insect pests) The whole process should be carried out in early spring of dormant buds, when all the fierce enemies just wake up and try to settle on apple. The pre-cleaned of old dead bark (burn). The whitewash - you can add a bit of nitrofen.I did not try, but it is said that a good idea to put on the trunk after whitewashing protivogusenichny special glue.Nothing is more effective than spraying, alas, not yet invented, with carefully both the tree and the soil in the tree trunks, and that's what ... if you're talking about high efficiency - chemistry course (or a solution of malathion chlorophos (0,3-0 , 7%), systemic insecticides. I, for many reasons of chemistry refused.Moved to bioinsecticides - no harmful to people or animals or bees) Do not know how, of course, but there are always some new ones. Effektivnye- boverin, fitoverm, aktofit, Lepidocide, Bicol, entobakterin (neighbors sometimes add very good. Small doses of any insecticide (trichlorfon, trihlormetafos-3, etc.). I - no).And you can spray the whole summer, until the end of the growing season. Well, plus water extracts / decoctions of plants - the aerial parts and roots of tomato, wormwood (even in the far corner of the planted shrubs to hand was a)), tobacco, onions and garlic added. soap. Processing immediately after flowering once every 7 days. Well handles nests of caterpillars periodically removed and incinerated.Of course, the tree begins to bear fruit, all at once windfalls collect and pass away, and it is better to burn. This summer, tortured) Harvest was incredible, mountains of fruit drop (In autumn - clear the ground under a tree on fallen leaves, fruits, dig 10-15 cm.In general, if properly and regularly engaged in all these, the fight turns serious, especially if the old garden)) Time and effort is not enough. Therefore, the effectiveness is difficult to judge, but to 12 g did not do anything, and there was the activation of the enemies)

15.11.2015 14:21, Irina Nikulina:

Well, I'll write today briefly to what I know and drink, but no recipes specific, it is possible to add, and the instructions all the details) Work some work, but, as expected on the timing and frequency - is not always possible, so the efficiency is reduced ) You're a gardener? :))

15.11.2015 10:55, Fedor Ovechkin:

Gerris

15.11.2015 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ampedus / Nikolai Vladimirov Ampedus pomonae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.11.2015 10:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tachinidae

15.11.2015 1:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

Nemouridae

15.11.2015 0:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If about 10 mm. Definitely not A. sanguineus. More drawn toAmpedus pomonae.
Tomorrow I will try to understand more precisely.

14.11.2015 23:38, Nikolai Vladimirov:

About 10 mm, more difficult to say ...

14.11.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nicholas, and what was the size of a beetle?

14.11.2015 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Excellent! Please send us your pictures!

14.11.2015 22:09, Igal Oz:

Thank you. Clear. I want to support this exciting project and will start gradually ship photos of species that are not found on the site :)

14.11.2015 21:42, Peter Khramov:

Yes, all the others too have changed. Irina, if you know the tools that really work (although there may be no new ones), then write, it will be interesting. The case, in fact, no novelty in itself, but in efficiency.

14.11.2015 21:38, Peter Khramov:

Igor, if you want the photo is not scaled on the site (a large amount), it is necessary to enter into a rectangle 1280x800. Fit - it does not mean that it should be exactly 1280x800 or that it should be horizontal. This means that it must not be greater than 1280 in width and not more than 800 adjustment. For example, it may be:
1280h666,
500h800,
680h580,
1000h740.
But.If Fautua download, for example, or 1280h801 1281h500, it will be proportionally scaled so that its width is less than 1280, and height - 800 pixels. At the same time the picture quality may deteriorate (program on the website scales more stupid than Photoshop with the correct settings).

14.11.2015 21:31, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, thank you. Tested only one page, you remember where referred to 153. There are now left in the list is 130th. Do I understand correctly that everyone else on the right machine switched to the East?
As for the fight against yabl.pests did not write, though gardener gardener with experience) You do, as I understand, we need new and interesting know-how and my techniques are not) In the old more and avoiding, whenever possible, yadrena him.sredstv )) I look forward too, maybe someone brand new report :)

14.11.2015 21:23, Igal Oz:

I did not understand, what is now the optimal size for uploading photos :( if 1200x800 is horizontal? And if the vertical or square, how much, and 800H533 800x800?

14.11.2015 21:09, Fedor Ovechkin:

Libelluloidea

14.11.2015 19:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Date, by the way, rather strange. Whether "inopportune" instance, whether it happens in the South, whether ochepatka ...

14.11.2015 19:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yes. Young. But traces of visible plaque on the abdomen.

Sometimes, by the way, old females, on the contrary, are covered by the coating. :)

14.11.2015 17:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Zygoptera

14.11.2015 16:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

14.11.2015 16:47, Peter Khramov:

Gardening question. There are some interesting thread of know-how in this area?

14.11.2015 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male, so male :)
Eugene, they probably nedookrasheny?

14.11.2015 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

14.11.2015 14:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Male.

14.11.2015 14:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

These things male.

14.11.2015 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dermaptera / Imago / Nikolai Vladimirov Forficula auricularia / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.11.2015 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, thanks :)

14.11.2015 12:19, Peter Khramov:

Basil is ready.

14.11.2015 12:19, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Batozonellus fuliginosus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.11.2015 12:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Batozonellus fuliginosus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.11.2015 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

14.11.2015 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.11.2015 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The MO 2 type. To determine the type of need to the upper side, and always backswimmers float belly-up.
Most likely itNotonecta glauca(as the most common), but there is no certainty why this picture is destined to be sp. forever because it is impossible to see the top (concrete panel).This is one of those cases where it is impossible to pinpoint on a photo in nature.

14.11.2015 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ilyocoris cimicoides / Nikolai Vladimirov Nepa cinerea / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.11.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nikolai Vladimirov Fedor Ovechkin.

14.11.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sialidae Sialis morio.

14.11.2015 9:48, Fedor Ovechkin:

Sialis morio

14.11.2015 1:54, Peter Khramov:

Recently, we've got the opportunity to limit the output of data on the site by one of the orders (for example, view photos, comments, descriptions, etc. only for Coleoptera, and ignore all other data). Now registered users in the Account Settings can select a random taxon (from subgenus and higher), and the setting to limit the data by the taxon will act permanently (unless the user does not cancel this setting).
So:
1. Now you can choose not only one of the orders, but any taxon from subgenus and higher.
2. Now you can make your setting permanent.

13.11.2015 23:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Eristalis Eristalis arbustorum.

13.11.2015 23:59, Peter Khramov:

It's time to do editing of the data currently in the LC, so that you can make and nicks, where and who is who, and so on ...

13.11.2015 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Irina, corrected. Submitted №130, but the data is slightly redrafted. INFA moved from 153 to 130.
Yevgeny Komarov, corrected.
Eugene Caroline embedded editing function you dragonflies. Before starting work, it would be necessary to phone to discuss what and how. See. Mail.
Alexander, the situation with editing supraspecific taxa butterflies corrected.Now you can edit all taxa, not just species.

13.11.2015 23:39, Peter Khramov:

I think the offer to become a scientific redom site Vladimir Zryaninu. Man is for the new site (because not special butterflies and ants on), but the basic work / knowledge is well-suited for the job (teaches entomology at the university, and therefore should be more or less aware of the whole nasekomyshey and not only because of its specialization).In every way a candidate, chairman of the Nizhny Novgorod branch of REO and the works. Well, yes, I met him about 18 years, so it can be recommended as an adequate person.
ZY His I have not asked, or will not, at first interested in your opinion - we can, there are some candidates / opinions or other comments on the issue.
Write.

13.11.2015 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.11.2015 19:47, Eugene Karolinskiy:

And how you can confidently exclude C. servilia?

13.11.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Imago / Vera Volkotrub Sympetrum cordulegaster / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Libellulidae / Imago / Vera Volkotrub Sympetrum cordulegaster / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 15:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sympetrum cordulegaster, male

13.11.2015 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Onychogomphus lefebvrii / Imago / Eugene Davkaev Ophiogomphus reductus / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 14:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ophiogomphus reductus, male

13.11.2015 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Mesapamea / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.11.2015 13:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chrysomelidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Galerucella lineola / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.11.2015 11:47, Eugene Karolinskiy:

And I know who is evk! :)

13.11.2015 9:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:41, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:40, Evgeny Komarov:

By the way, what Kharkovbut on Molbiole is Eugene found out, alas, just now)))).

13.11.2015 9:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Erythromma najas Erythromma viridulum.

13.11.2015 9:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:35, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:33, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eugene Karolinskiy.

13.11.2015 9:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Thank you, Eugene. Alas, it does not work :)

13.11.2015 9:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, here it doubles by writing the author of various kinds: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1000417 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/788603. In one case, Aeshna affinis vander Linden 1820 in another Aeshna affinis Vander Linden 1820. In both cases, wrong. It should be like that Aeshna affinis Van der Linden, 1820.

13.11.2015 8:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, so categorically impossible. Place of work that does not govorit.opredeleniya, must be correct. And novices can be carefully determined.

13.11.2015 8:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I fully support Eugene. And not just one defined (names not everyone knows), but also a place of work to determine if a person professionally engaged in any group of insects. Then trust as to the site as a whole and for specific images will be more.After all, no one will deny that it is impossible to know all kinds of families, and that more than a few units.
And if someone refuses to explain by whom, where or how to make a determination, the determination of those considered as taking a "ceiling" and transfer them into the category of not exactly defined in vague or general.

13.11.2015 8:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, questions asked, we wait for confirmation, it is in no hurry. :) I do not like, it does not mean that it is not, it is no other alternative.

13.11.2015 6:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eristalis Eristalis arbustorum.

13.11.2015 6:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eristalis Eristalis arbustorum.

13.11.2015 5:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! From mistakes no one is immune. As for this image, all the determination in this case were made and recorded at me. A Belyaev by moths DV, I trust more than any other. Ineta source. From scopul in a particular case it was granted only one picture. The internet is now a little normal sites. Even this one http: //www.jpmoth.org / it is outdated, not precise and have not been updated.
Ps. Alexander ! I took your infu noted. It will be able to peresproshu, and now will not distract, the end of the year and so on. I think you all know ....

12.11.2015 23:47, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This Erythromma viridulum . The analogy does not always work. :)

And by the way, Eugene, imho would be comme il faut to specify who determined.

12.11.2015 23:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eristalis arbustorum

12.11.2015 22:56, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eristalis arbustorum

12.11.2015 21:36, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

12.11.2015 21:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Eugene, I'm sorry, I myself will change the geography of the picture.

12.11.2015 21:34, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, please see, in the list of literature - №130 and №153 - the same source. 5th volume of the 5 'to the insects of the DDA "entered twice with one difference -" Edited "... and" Edited "I have several times referred to №153. If you remove it, it will be necessary to correct the references.

12.11.2015 21:13, Irina Nikulina:

Slabozubchatye thin sling distinguishing feature - a middle field and darker internal podkraevogo. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3610Mythimna/3613Mythimna_divergens/Mythimna%20divergens.htm

12.11.2015 21:11, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eristalis arbustorum

12.11.2015 21:10, Irina Nikulina:

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3610Mythimna/3612Mythimna_grandis/Mythimna%20grandis.htm
Sling dark, clear, external sling gear (sometimes general background of the dark reddish-brown, and the sling does not expressed) in Japanese sites are given a more characteristic feature - crimped kidney-shaped spot with a bend, greater at the lower end, as if enveloping black dot

12.11.2015 21:05, Irina Nikulina:

http://www.naris.go.kr/v2/naris_search/search_result_detail.jsp?inst_id=1307956 view Exterior close to Mythimna turca, but the color of the wings pale reddish-brown in contrast to the intense moment turca. Kidney-shaped spot in the form of a white point with blurred weak shading (for turca - a distinct white cross bar).

12.11.2015 19:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bombyliidae / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

12.11.2015 19:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

Bombyliidae

12.11.2015 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aromia moschata Aromia moschata orientalis.

12.11.2015 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, there is no error or a butterfly ?, this does not look like much umbelaria, that in Europe, though in the east a povid. Well, very different.

12.11.2015 15:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Araeopteron / Yuri Semejkin.

12.11.2015 15:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, you're probably kidding? Why delete if there is no representative of the genus. At least have an idea what kind of butterfly. Photography normal there to determine the type is very difficult to tomuzhe with Primorye after the catalog has described 3 types, so they are now you have 6.

12.11.2015 14:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Araeopteron, perhaps amoena, but zkz. shabby and in Primorye lives half a dozen similar species. So it probably makes sense to remove, to the species still will not come. Determined: Matt AJ ZIN.

12.11.2015 13:58, Irina Nikulina:

Very similar to the seaside Colias erate. According to literary. According to [2], [153] in Primorye and Sakhalin flies a subspecies of C. e. poliographus

12.11.2015 12:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, the end of dancing, but the site correctly. Kind is very complicated.

12.11.2015 12:48, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Trigonoscelis nodosa.

12.11.2015 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia tripunctaria.

12.11.2015 12:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Now come down! So I check in any possible synonyms :)

12.11.2015 12:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, all right, we do not have your computer glitches. Species name can not be seen because it is not in the catalog. Name wrote Belousov seen only in the the admin . He had to duplicate it in the comments of the author, but he did not.Previously, these photos could uvidettoko in A dminke , but now it turns out that they can be seen in the gallery.

12.11.2015 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fact that Alexander downloaded the form from the form download without autosubstitution, just write the name of the species and subspecies in the appropriate line.
Since the species is not on the site, took photos in the admin area and was in uncertain, and the name of the subspecies remains in place as it was hammered into the line that to download pictures of the place has nothing to do.All the way it seems, Eugene. This is normal.
You just have to create a look here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/982280 and transfer.
Everything will fall into place.
The remaining taxa nodosa I checked and they are irrelevant to the darkling not. Therefore, we can act boldly :)

12.11.2015 12:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander! I understand perfectly. I'm talking about other things - a photo did not specify the name of the species, subspecies only !!! I wonder if you see Caption Belousov? I have just a subspecies listed species without. That's interesting, bug or glitch site in my browser?

12.11.2015 12:13, Yuri Semejkin:

As Google also says Eupithecia tripunctata, and online E.tripunctaria

12.11.2015 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.11.2015 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Syrphini Syrphus torvus.

12.11.2015 12:09, Fedor Ovechkin:

Syrphus torvus

12.11.2015 12:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Eupithecia tripunctata Identified Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS.

12.11.2015 12:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

12.11.2015 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, all right. Alexander Belousov has identified species and subspecies, wrote and sent to the site. But the catalog of this kind there is, it automatically goes to the admin panel. Determination author is, and the type is not in the catalog. If you create the form, it will take him to the definition of the Belousov.If the machine will not go away, after the creation of the form, put in the name of a binary image in the box below and click the admin knoprku update data. But before the creation of a new type, look in the directory is already 4-5 nodosa, but other branches can only view is of a different kind, then it is moved to.

12.11.2015 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

In the blue of Sakhalin only two species Colias erate and Colias palaeno, then it Colias erate, if there is then it could be something else.

12.11.2015 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colias / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.11.2015 7:49, Evgeny Komarov:

What kind of miracles that's this: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/47679? Open pages of the form, have: Photo # 47679. (type not specified)
Imago, ssp. schrenkii (Gebler, 1844). I ask the author, "subspecies of a species?". I look in the admin - there is a photo signed "# 47679 Trigonoscelis nodosa" !!! As in the admin view can be signed by the author, and do not have a photo on the page?
View is not specifically add - see the cause of right.Or maybe just because I displayed!

11.11.2015 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cordulegaster insignis Cordulegaster insignis coronata.

11.11.2015 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cordulegaster insignis Cordulegaster insignis coronata.

11.11.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cordulegaster insignis Cordulegaster insignis coronata.

11.11.2015 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

11.11.2015 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cordulegaster insignis Cordulegaster insignis coronata.

11.11.2015 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cordulegaster insignis Cordulegaster insignis coronata.

11.11.2015 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cordulegaster insignis Cordulegaster insignis coronata.

11.11.2015 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cordulegaster insignis Cordulegaster insignis coronata.

11.11.2015 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cordulegaster insignis Cordulegaster insignis coronata.

11.11.2015 22:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Mellicta ambigua ambigua Melitaea ambigua.

11.11.2015 21:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Melitaea plotina / Evgeny Komarov Mellicta ambigua ambigua / Irina Nikulina.

11.11.2015 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lethocerus fakir (Gistel, 1848) (sin. Belostoma niloticum Stal, 1854): http://gni.globalnames.org/?search_term=id:5625379

11.11.2015 20:10, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Melitaea plotina / Evgeny Komarov Melitaea ambigua / Irina Nikulina.

11.11.2015 20:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Irina, this is clearly my puncture. Determines my colleague and lover, most likely, either he or I'm somewhere with photos mixed up. It certainly did not plotina.

11.11.2015 20:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander, a subspecies of a species?

11.11.2015 20:00, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Eugene Davkaev Hycleus khodjenticus / Evgeny Komarov.

11.11.2015 19:36, Irina Nikulina:

Evgeny, I think this butterfly is Melitaea ambiguaIf you pass the keys here http://babochki.narod.ru/ny00.html, the first of their distinctive features is the color of the near-edge fringe on the underside (in ambigua it is white or light yellow, in plotina - reddish), except this the underside pattern in plotina is more multicolored and median band is not stand out as шт ambigua, and consists of a single row of white spots (the last sign in the keys) -http: // babochki.narod.ru/ny22.html, and in ambigua - a band of light, large double spots http://babochki.narod.ru/ny19.html. Here, too, differences are clearly visible http://rusinsects.com/nymph/n-melict.хтм

11.11.2015 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Hydrelia nisaria / Yuri Semejkin.

11.11.2015 16:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Hydrelia nisaria Identified Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS.

11.11.2015 13:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.11.2015 13:49, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela Cicindela turkestanica.

11.11.2015 13:46, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Eugene Davkaev Cicindela turkestanica / Evgeny Komarov.

11.11.2015 13:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Eugene! You do not shoot the wrong place? In Karelia this kind do not seem to live :)

11.11.2015 13:42, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela Cicindela clypeata clypeata.

11.11.2015 13:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Blaps deplanata Blaps titanus.

11.11.2015 13:32, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Blaps deplanata Blaps titanus.

11.11.2015 13:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Blaps deplanata Blaps titanus.

11.11.2015 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

What you withheld, I realized. :))

11.11.2015 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander about her constantly as I recall, because it provided a foundation for the addition.
This site is not a special case and should remember about it.

11.11.2015 12:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

I repeat slow certain species to genus are all higher taxa standing at the bottom of the page. Therefore, neither of which is not necessary to search. As I mentioned, there have been different, where more generic, where errors navzvanii where there is no race at all in the internet and website.
The concept of fast, relatively.Vasily interfere photo in admin, he offered no ship photo, and then uploaded to himself, and now a day to kind of reminds done.
We must be consistent.
Forms are sent to the admin panel if they gave the name, but it is not on the site. It happens that the species is not present on the site, is that the error in the title race is not set properly, a lot of options.and I agree with Basil, the fewer species in the admin area, the better, and we must get them out of there. Correcting errors in the title, change the kind and determination to set up kind of in the event that a picture has a name in the comments of the author. If not, wait until you dare to question where the error occurred.

11.11.2015 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Rhizophagus fenestralis / Nikolai Vladimirov.

11.11.2015 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the admin all in one place where all the photos identified to species.
So just do not need to send for the birth or other taxa there is a photo on the website is not the species themselves.
Let's say I have no idea what specific sorts to look for these photos.
Themselves create confusion.

11.11.2015 11:41, Peter Khramov:

Basil has a view that they can not find as quickly as in the admin.

11.11.2015 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

And what to look for them. They are certain to type in their families, superfamilies infrootryadah suborders detachments at the bottom of the page. And they can watch. There's still a part of the species was on the other generic combination, also put in place.

11.11.2015 10:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe diana sachalinensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.11.2015 10:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe diana sachalinensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.11.2015 10:43, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Hydrillodes morosa / Yuri Semejkin.

11.11.2015 10:41, Peter Khramov:

Let us somehow, does not fall apart.

11.11.2015 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here: http://insecta.pro/ru/community/18428
In my post (the latter in the topic).
Even in the admin bugs hanging from September. Certain to species.
For a number of certain species to Alexander out for some reason sent to the genera and now have to look for these photos (

11.11.2015 8:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eupithecia / Yuri Semejkin.

11.11.2015 8:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eupithecia / Yuri Semejkin.

11.11.2015 8:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eupithecia / Yuri Semejkin.

11.11.2015 3:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Eupithecia sp. Determined Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS.

11.11.2015 3:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Eupithecia sp. Determined Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS.

11.11.2015 1:24, Peter Khramov:

You mean which kind?

11.11.2015 0:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Hydrillodes morosa Identified Matov AY ZIN,

11.11.2015 0:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pimelia / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

11.11.2015 0:09, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Staphylinidae / Nikolai Vladimirov Philonthus / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2015 23:53, Evgeny Komarov:

In this shot confidently identify species of the subgenus Emphanes little really, but for the Moscow region the probability of more than 80%)

10.11.2015 23:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Bembidion / Confidently identified Bembidion azurescens / Tentatively identified.

10.11.2015 23:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Camponotus japonicus / Vladimir Zryanin.

10.11.2015 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Formicidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Camponotus japonicus / Vladimir Zryanin.

10.11.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, kind of added matter of minutes, especially when the author is aware of the grounds and provides a source from which it is added. And besides, after adding the source in the database :)

10.11.2015 23:21, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I think you know well, for what fell into the matter.

10.11.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well adds. For what was the matter up? It's time if you already have a photo.

10.11.2015 23:00, Vladimir Zryanin:

Tolerated. Especially that for this kind of Vladivostok leads itself Kupyanskaya (1990).

10.11.2015 22:55, Peter Khramov:

New types will be added until just me. In general, for this purpose (and not only for this) it would be necessary to think about the position of the scientific editor of the site.
As for the doubles. I am interested in the situation when the person is not a specialist. Then:
1. Maybe a bunch of duplicates (as now).
2.Or most of them can be reduced (with the preservation of synonyms) on the basis of Common Sense with an accuracy of about 75-80 percent.
Suspecting that the second option is preferable because, even where there are errors, it will not be an error as such, as, for example, obsolete data, again, maintaining synonyms (ie, they can be found quickly).

10.11.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I agree with Eugene about doubles. Throw this venture with a gun.
It is impossible to manage without a living, thinking person in the right direction.
Just raise the issue of adding kinds of photos that are on the site and the species themselves in the database do not.
If such a situation with the curators - is ready to take the case on.I find where, where, and how to add that if there is a need for this.
It is necessary to move the business off the ground.

10.11.2015 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Transferred to a precise definition or inaccurate?

10.11.2015 21:17, Vladimir Zryanin:

According to an adjacent dense pubescence abdomen isCamponotus japonicus

10.11.2015 20:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapanthia / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2015 19:53, Vladimir Zryanin:

Initial definitionCamponotus(s. Str.), More precisely in the monograph look AN Kupyansk and write later.

10.11.2015 19:50, Vladimir Zryanin:

Initial definitionCamponotus(s. Str.), More precisely in the monograph look AN Kupyansk and write later.

10.11.2015 19:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Formica / Fedor Ovechkin Camponotus herculeanus / Vladimir Zryanin.

10.11.2015 19:37, Vladimir Zryanin:

It is not Serviformica or even tribe Formicini, and Camponotus (judging by geographyCamponotus herculeanus)

10.11.2015 18:33, Peter Khramov:

You can see correct headers now.

10.11.2015 15:38, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.11.2015 15:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Cicindela / Eugene Davkaev Cicindela clypeata clypeata / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2015 15:35, Peter Khramov:

And rightly so, Yuri.

10.11.2015 15:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.11.2015 15:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphylla irrorata / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2015 13:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Papilio machaon / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.11.2015 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plagionotus floralis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2015 11:03, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plagionotus floralis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2015 10:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Paraplagionotus floralis (Pall., 1773)

10.11.2015 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhocoris apterus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.11.2015 10:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trigonoscelis muricata / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2015 10:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Eugene! if possible - lay not one angle and very desirable larger scale.

10.11.2015 8:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Shot phone, so do not judge too much for the quality. Other images on the website yet, and therefore dropped.

10.11.2015 8:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hydraecia ultima / Sergei Kotov Hydraecia micacea / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.11.2015 7:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Determination Anticypella diffusaria confirmed Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS.

10.11.2015 7:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Determination Anticypella diffusaria confirmed Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS.

10.11.2015 6:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio machaon

10.11.2015 6:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

10.11.2015 6:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

10.11.2015 6:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

10.11.2015 5:34, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Labidostomis.

10.11.2015 1:07, Irina Nikulina:

Lethe diana ssp.sachalinensis Matsumura, 1925

09.11.2015 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

E. p. ascoldensis (Oberthur, 1880) It is necessary to this subspecies (continental part of the DV) to add to the description of the kind. E. p. bergmanni - it just smoked.

09.11.2015 22:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Since there is no system takes, I do not see. This is a different approach, and most importantly, not all the sites monitored taxonomic changes. You can only edit the hands curator, previously well understood that at the moment is a priority in the framework of accepted approaches on our site. And for different groups of the approach will be different.Let Carabidae with me, to simplify the life of his beloved, accept the classification carabidae.org., TB there is a clear and sufficient operational control over all changes This is the ideal situation, when the curator is infinitesimal presentation about the group and there is a resource, which is represented by its system, which is more or less recognized.In the vast majority of taxonomic groups we have curators and there are no resources available.Therefore, there is a person who on his own initiative to deal with these doubles (these things possible - it's network resources allow to find in most cases that is currently considered a valid name, but again it is necessary to take any one approach, though the same Global Names Index ) - will slowly dig.In your set takes solid scoops (in the broad sense). In various literature can be found such names and syakie versions of these species. Hardware - not treated! Looking curators.

09.11.2015 21:48, Irina Nikulina:

Reserves photo # 28799

09.11.2015 20:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Good background =)

09.11.2015 20:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Finally! Ato accustomed to, and to wean no longer interesting =)

09.11.2015 17:56, Peter Khramov:

And more about searching the site. Do not forget that there is an additional search function on the site through Yandex. Trying to drive request in the search box, click "Find" on the search page under "Search Insecta.pro using Yandex" introduce us to the desired request, and seek it with all sloformami and other nice features done Yandex. Now this search engine almost 700.000 pages of our site in the index so that searches using it can be quite successful. This is especially true when you are looking for is not on the name of the taxon, but in an arbitrary portion of the text on the site.

09.11.2015 17:50, Peter Khramov:

Dear users! May we remind you: when writing a comment, you can mark taxa names with (like this:taxon name in Latin, without the author and the year). So if there is such a taxon in the site database, it's name will be automatically converted into the hyperlink to taxon's page. Also this feature will work with "Add info about species" form.

09.11.2015 16:13, Peter Khramov:

Lord, on the subspecies - yes, I will do. Irina, about geography - corrected. People take a look and have examples of synonyms if the deal with them, in one fell swoop, we will repair a lot of glitches in all taxa, which would otherwise have curators peredylyvat clock manually.

09.11.2015 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with such definition.

09.11.2015 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Anticypella diffusaria / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2015 16:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Ophthalmitis irrorataria / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2015 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Aspidimorpha miliaris / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.11.2015 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Aspidimorpha miliaris / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.11.2015 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Aspidimorpha miliaris / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.11.2015 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Aspidimorpha miliaris / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.11.2015 6:52, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Gastrolina depressa.

09.11.2015 3:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Gastrolina depressa Baly, 1859 ?

08.11.2015 21:03, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, look, please, again buggy in search (and geography)
1. Search works, but the 2nd and others. It is impossible to move the page
2. After the search, involving geography is not possible to go the whole gallery (without geogr), automatically goes substitution already unnecessary geography, although the field is cleared.Even with the change of name of the author once again put a gun geography previous search, which was used for the previous author. We have to close the gallery and start again.
Without geography all right, all page. Open

08.11.2015 20:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Of course!

08.11.2015 19:55, Fedor Ovechkin:

Bombylius medius.

08.11.2015 19:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan! If a species-genus is, ship photo. And the place it will fall over time, it's insects million described species with a tail, a few hundred views of the system and the mass of all other interesting)). Vida-kind not - write, someone where added at the same time on the move and can fix that supraspecific miracles, which is then complete.

08.11.2015 19:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Here I am about that. Who began to take a little bit from the collection. Example: there are instances of different subspecies of one species is not in the database. View added, and as the next? Back to the photos in the signature register subspecies? Lightly, if you are already hang pictures to the subspecies (not always, alas, it turned out).It is necessary to suspend the mold type is similar to adding a sub-species (if not already have one) and give it access to the curators!

08.11.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, and to work with the subspecies we can not (at least I do not have such rights).
And it is necessary to have such rights.

08.11.2015 19:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, faced with the problem (possibly for lack soobrazhalki). It is necessary to add the missing form (everything is OK) and subtypes to it (I do not understand how to do this). Ie in adding information to mean I can specify a subspecies, but make subtype so that to it still photo can be shipped ...

08.11.2015 19:07, Evgeny Komarov:

The answer is, Peter. Options normally just stupid not. Actually there are two possible in the current situation is doing :) Or you're on zaposam "bottom" or give it the right to some of the curators (one, two, etc.). To give such a right - to be discussed here.Just having such rights should be seriously posherstiv available information and determine the feasibility. Something like this.

08.11.2015 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, take the fire itself in the production of all taxa.
Ehhh ... rassharivat at all :)

08.11.2015 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliini Bombylius major.

08.11.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ivan, this does not apply to the glitch - it refers to the fact that curators need to bring the system back in order.
And the whole huge kuratorv order Coleoptera is online only two: your humble servant and Evgeny Komarov.And we are currently engaged in completely different groups which are also a complete mess ((
In fact the question:
According to some reports the tribe Psylloborini Casey, 1899 and all the tribe is synonymous Coccinellini Latreille, 1807:
http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id10797/
And, accordingly, it should not even be on the site as a separate tribe.
And to reach the hands of ladybirds. You just have to wait a while)

08.11.2015 18:15, Peter Khramov:

The issue:
1. The curators have not for all groups.
2. Adding a need species including and in those groups where the curators yet.
3. We need a person who will be the appropriate authority. In this entertaining class specificity: it is necessary to put taxa in which you are not special.What are the proposals that we will do in this situation?

And I recall the request to look page with examples takes http://insecta.pro/dub.htm. It must be this something to do, I take, even those quite a lot.

08.11.2015 17:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

Bombylius major

08.11.2015 17:39, Ivan Tislenko:

There tribe Psylloborini (http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/979842), in which no one psillobory, and is a kind of Psyllobora (http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838186), not included in this tribe. It is illogical somehow, or is this normal?

08.11.2015 17:22, Shamil Murtazin:

If the same kind of spread in regions like butterflies on the blue, all these tables are obtained automatically;)

08.11.2015 17:16, Ivan Tislenko:

http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838178 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/981750 - it's the same kind of a typo in the title?

08.11.2015 17:11, Yuri Semejkin:

If done in the form of tables. In DV already have similar do in Siberia, the Urals, etc.

08.11.2015 14:41, Ivan Tislenko:

It would be interesting if for the main taxa statistics output, similar to that on the main page.

08.11.2015 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Really already be more than 7000 :)
It is necessary to add species.
Photos are specific to the species and their number gradually increases ....
But the species themselves, in which to place these photos on the website yet.
But the curators can only add to their groups ....

08.11.2015 14:06, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is also made with a form.

08.11.2015 14:01, Ivan Tislenko:

For me it would be convenient if for taxa above species could add Russian names (for example, it is now realized for the species)

08.11.2015 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus Danaus chrysippus chrysippus.

08.11.2015 13:27, Peter Khramov:

If a NG we reach tens, it will, of course, is not very good. Given the increased number of taxa. But the 7 - is also a good number.

08.11.2015 13:23, Peter Khramov:

Obviously, these things right will be published on the pages of the relevant taxa. While this can only be done in the comments, and this is not good. I propose to discuss the form fields (like the one we have now works for species of butterflies), to be used for supra taxa. Either make a simplified version (ie,just a piece of information - istochik - the user, the Old zanesshego on site).
Who thinks that?
PS. Lord, I offer the same enforce even the most basic rules of the Russian language.I understand that lazily put a dash instead of a hyphen, but at least it separate the "dash" on both sides of a space (except when one-word range), and put a space before "(" after ")", and not vice versa. Similarly, with the opening and closing quotation marks.
So attentive to the tags if they are using.
PPS. Incidentally, I wonder about the e.Wings kanesh hard, but there is a suspicion that still beetles, not zhёstkokrylye.

08.11.2015 13:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

Danaus chrysippus chrysippus

08.11.2015 13:00, Irina Nikulina:

Ophthalmitis irrorataria

08.11.2015 12:47, Irina Nikulina:

Anticypella diffusaria

08.11.2015 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.11.2015 12:34, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

08.11.2015 12:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.11.2015 12:32, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

08.11.2015 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.11.2015 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.11.2015 12:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

08.11.2015 12:22, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

08.11.2015 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.11.2015 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.11.2015 12:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

08.11.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.11.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

08.11.2015 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.11.2015 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.11.2015 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

08.11.2015 12:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

08.11.2015 12:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

08.11.2015 12:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

male and female

08.11.2015 11:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

08.11.2015 11:52, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

08.11.2015 11:49, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

08.11.2015 11:19, Ivan Tislenko:

Clear. Another question here is bulging belly (seen in the second photo that instance http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/45846) means that it is a female?

08.11.2015 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Oedemera / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.11.2015 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Myrmeleontidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.11.2015 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Myrmeleontidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.11.2015 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oedemeridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

08.11.2015 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oedemeridae / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

08.11.2015 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis pellucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

08.11.2015 10:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis pellucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

08.11.2015 10:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis pellucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

08.11.2015 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Volucella pellucens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.11.2015 5:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Autosticha modicella ( Christoph , 1882).

08.11.2015 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris lipsiana / Tentatively identified / Ilia Ustiantcev.

08.11.2015 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cliorismia / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

08.11.2015 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Culex / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

08.11.2015 0:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dixidae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

08.11.2015 0:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dixidae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bolitophila / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bolitophila / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bolitophila / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bolitophila / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coelosia / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coelosia / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysura / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysura / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

07.11.2015 23:07, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Chrysolina aurichalcea Chrysolina graminis graminis.

07.11.2015 23:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan, you're right! It all turned out to be quite interesting - it was my copy, which I thought aurichalcea, it is not, alas. It was a graminis absolutely atypical for the type of color. That's it.

07.11.2015 20:46, Ivan Tislenko:

Unfortunately it is not considered an important designate who defined the "my" insects. Who I tried to remember: first, it has identified E. Alexander Zykov on Makroklube like Chrysolina cerealis (now do not check, because there is something zaglyuchil). Then, on the site of the Zoological his determined Andrew O. Bieńkowska as Chrysolina aurichalcea (Mann., 1825) http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/tinfoto1.htm. And what else may be possible?

07.11.2015 17:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Confuses me pictures of this instance. Not typical, sometimes with the planned series of punctures and practically straight converging sides of the pronotum.

07.11.2015 17:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

Catopsilia pyranthe pyranthe

07.11.2015 16:58, Fedor Ovechkin:

Catopsilia pomona pomona

07.11.2015 16:58, Fedor Ovechkin:

Catopsilia pomona pomona

07.11.2015 16:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

Catopsilia pomona pomona

07.11.2015 16:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

Catopsilia pomona pomona

07.11.2015 15:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Ivan! Yes, I, too, from amateurs. As for the name of the Russian troops, then it's all there in the internet.

07.11.2015 14:44, Ivan Tislenko:

Thank informative! I, as a layman, is not enough in parentheses Russian troops here. Moreover, the descriptions suborders and families have called in Russian.

07.11.2015 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bombyliini / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

07.11.2015 12:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This inattention)))

07.11.2015 12:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Appias pandione / Imago Catopsilia pomona / Female.

07.11.2015 11:48, Fedor Ovechkin:

Bombyliini

07.11.2015 11:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Here is a surprise appearance, to the day of the October Revolution.

07.11.2015 5:18, Yuri Semejkin:

These figures led to show all visiting to the site Insecta how diverse world of insects and how sometimes difficult to give a precise definition.

07.11.2015 5:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Trichoptera - quite a large detachment of aquatic insects. In the Russian Far East found 326 species from 25 families. (De ..., 1997).

07.11.2015 4:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Plecoptera - well studied detachment of aquatic insects. In the Russian Far East noted 123 species of 8 families. (De ..., 1986).

07.11.2015 4:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Troop Orthoptera / Russian Far East found 140 species of 10 families of the suborder Nematocera and korotkousye.

07.11.2015 4:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Odonata- well studied detachment of aquatic insects. In the Russian Far East found 84 species of 9 families.

07.11.2015 4:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Troop Neyroptera represented in the Far East Russia 5 families and 77 species. Among lacewing in the region the most diverse lacewing (Chrysopidae) and hemeroby (Hemerobidae).

07.11.2015 4:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Order Homoptera includes suborders cycads (Cicadina), psyllites (Psyllina), whiteflies (Aleyrodina), aphids (Apgina) and mealybugs and scale insects (Coccina). In the Russian Far East found 1337 species from 43 families in these five suborders. (De ..., 1988).

07.11.2015 4:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Heteroptera squad in the Far East Russia fairly complete study here found 807 species from 37 families of terrestrial and aquatic bugs

07.11.2015 4:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Ephemeroptera- well studied detachment of aquatic insects. In the Russian Far East found 129 species from 16 families (de ... 1986 Tiunova 2007

07.11.2015 3:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Diptera- one of the dominant groups of insects in the world fauna numbering 152,000, and in Russia 20 000- 25 000 species (Adler, Foottit, 2009; Narchyk, 1999). Diptera are using all kinds of food substrates and inhabit almost all habitats. For the Russian Far East was significantly noted 120 families expected the presence of 5,000 species (Narchyk, 1999).Information on the number of families are still scarce, and being in a new region for the fauna of Russian families. In the published editions of the determinant (1999b, 2001b, 2004, 2006) included 7141 view of Diptera, and we can assume that in the Far Vostioke Russia will be found at least 8,000 species.

07.11.2015 3:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Hymenoptera- one of the largest orders of insects in the world fauna described more than 145 000 species (Hubner, 2009). In the Far East of Russia, he is superior to all other groups of the variety of insects: it lives at least 9,000 species of Hymenoptera from 70 families.
.... Fauna Sem. Braconidae in the Far East is studied much better than in other regions of the Palearctic.It is well known 2247 species from 208 genera braconids (de ..., 1998, 2000, 2007), representing 50% of the Palaearctic fauna. Palaearctic Ichneumonidae in the number of species exceed braconids, so you can expect to find the Russian Far East more than 3,000 species of this family of riders, although a summary is included in all 1223 species from 345 genera (de ..., 2007).

07.11.2015 2:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Lepidoptera- second biggest squad in the world fauna, including 157 000-250 000 species from 121 families (Pouge, 2009; Kuznetsov, Stekolnikov, 2001). The fauna of Russia found 8879 species from 91 families. The "Key ..." on 79 families and 4261 form (de ..., 1997, 1999a, 2001a, 2003, 2005).Most of the moths and two smaller families, the total number of species which are in the Far East is 400-450, were not included in the "Key" .... Thus, the Russian Far East is expected finding more than 5,000 species from 81 families.

07.11.2015 2:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Estimate of the number of species of insects of the Far East of Russia on orders


Coleoptera- the most numerous group of insects in the world (360 000 species, of Bouchard et al., 2009) and the Palaearctic (100 000 species, of Konstantinov et al., 2009) fauna. Zhёstkokrylye inhabit all the landscape-geographical zones and are part of all types of ecological communities, in addition to Community marine waters.In the Russian Far East is one of the most studied among the major groups of insects are found representatives of 109 families. In the Russian Far East Coleoptera published 3 books (de ... 1989, 1992, 1996) and to create a computer catalog (Cherish et al., 1999), which contains information about 5100 species, belonging to 1559 genera of 117 families.Of these 4048 species inhabit the Russian Far East, the others are presented in adjacent regions and may be found on the Russian territory. In general, the Russian Far East is expected finding at least 5,500 species of zhёstkokrylyh.

07.11.2015 1:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

This photo number: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/30616

07.11.2015 0:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What is 30616?

06.11.2015 22:41, Irina Nikulina:

Total 2 times seen in the nature of this butterfly. And now I noticed that it was the anniversary, 2000th in my gallery) and are in the mood to repeat the same thing written under # 27670 almost 2 years ago - Beauty will save the world! )

06.11.2015 21:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Stepped 7,000 =)

06.11.2015 21:05, Evgeny Komarov:

It is desirable, nevertheless, a gathering place / point shooting. In this case it is easier, but ...

06.11.2015 21:04, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

/ Lebia chlorocephala / Evgeny Komarov.

06.11.2015 20:14, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lithosiini Eilema.

06.11.2015 20:13, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 19:43, Fedor Ovechkin:

Dmitry, and what's the difference from #30616?

06.11.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, thank you. I told you there :)
I have to explain to her in detail (available).
Then I make a decision.

06.11.2015 19:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! I'll write about in a personal Agapanthia - Danilevsky said! Solve it yourself!

06.11.2015 17:54, Irina Nikulina:

Here, I think, we can concretize only till Eilema sp. There are 14 species in Primorie and several of them are under suspicion, it's necessary to make it clear if it is possible to identify by photo) Or ask professionals.

06.11.2015 17:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Yuri Semejkin.

06.11.2015 17:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arctiinae / Evgeny Komarov Rhyparioides amurensis / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 17:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lithosiini / Imago / Evgeny Komarov Lithosia quadra / Male / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 17:25, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Lithosiini / Imago / Evgeny Komarov Lithosia quadra / Female / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 17:23, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Miltochrista / Evgeny Komarov Miltochrista aberrans / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 17:21, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arctiina / Evgeny Komarov Rhyparia purpurata / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 16:50, Irina Nikulina:

Rhyparia purpurata

06.11.2015 16:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is also a weakling zhuchishka- there)))

06.11.2015 16:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

06.11.2015 16:44, Irina Nikulina:

Miltochrista aberrans

06.11.2015 16:29, Irina Nikulina:

Lithosia quadra, female

06.11.2015 16:27, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion this Lithosia quadra (LINNAEUS, 1758)

06.11.2015 15:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arctiinae / Evgeny Komarov Rhyparioides amurensis / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 15:29, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arctiinae / Evgeny Komarov Rhyparioides amurensis / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 15:27, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arctiinae / Evgeny Komarov Rhyparioides amurensis / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 15:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

06.11.2015 15:24, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arctiinae / Evgeny Komarov Rhyparioides nebulosa / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 15:22, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Arctiinae / Evgeny Komarov Spilosoma punctarium / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2015 12:09, Irina Nikulina:

Rhyparioides amurensis

06.11.2015 12:07, Irina Nikulina:

Also, I think, Rhyparioides amurensis With such prominent spots at the inner edge of the VC also occur http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/vk/dysplay_virt_koll.pl?id=616&fam=Arctiidae&t=t_entry (1 row )

06.11.2015 12:03, Irina Nikulina:

And here, most likely, another kind - Rhyparioides nebulosa http://www.jpmoth.org/Arctiidae/Arctiinae/Rhyparioides_nebulosa.html

06.11.2015 11:59, Irina Nikulina:

Rhyparioides amurensis He has a variety of color variations are. Eugene, look at the second link http://catocala.narod.ru/arc24.html
http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/vk/dysplay_virt_koll.pl?id=615&fam=Arctiidae&t=t_entry

06.11.2015 11:55, Irina Nikulina:

Spilosoma punctarium
http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/images/Spilosoma_punctarium.htm

06.11.2015 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter added please pereponov in view of which I asked you in the theme "Please add view / other taxa"
Photos couples I still put it in the admin panel:
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46878
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46879
Wasp noble and taking into account geography, its other photos not soon happen on the site.

06.11.2015 10:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pieris melete in my opinion

06.11.2015 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

06.11.2015 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

06.11.2015 10:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Coliadinae Appias pandione.

06.11.2015 10:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Appias pandione lagela Moore,[1879]

06.11.2015 10:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pareronia Pareronia anais.

06.11.2015 10:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pareronia / Imago Pareronia anais / Female.

06.11.2015 10:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pareronia anais anais (Lesson,1837)

06.11.2015 10:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema Eurema daira.

06.11.2015 10:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema daira

06.11.2015 10:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema Eurema leuce.

06.11.2015 9:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Unfortunately there is no sign)))

06.11.2015 9:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.11.2015 9:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is no options - border apical buds in the front of the top is not expressed, and the spot in the form of eight.
A more yavnye- veins of old age. A photo is good, do not remove it

06.11.2015 9:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Let it be a subspecies - it's not so fundamentally, the main thing that the taxon species level was :)

06.11.2015 9:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea core / Female.

06.11.2015 9:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea core graminifera (Moore,1883)

06.11.2015 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Czechs with Zlatko once again the most adequate in my opinion.
Especially here the type Capnodis carbonaria (Klug, 1829) is, and the kind of Capnodis sexmaculata Ballion, 1871 no.
Therefore it is better let it be here. Kind of do not want to be added in order not to produce the probable duplicates.

06.11.2015 9:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea klugii / Male.

06.11.2015 9:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea / Imago Euploea klugii / Male.

06.11.2015 9:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea klugii erichsonii

06.11.2015 9:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, and it may not be worth while in the subspecies? On Zina, who I am somehow inclined to trust more than the Czechs, both independent http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/dicerctr.htm

06.11.2015 8:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The size and exact label (at least to the island) should be

06.11.2015 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Capnodis carbonaria sexmaculata Ballion, 1871 is a subspecies from the Capnodis carbonaria (Klug, 1829) : http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id1121680/
Left his own definition because the image in the admin with the definition of the same assumption, Eugene.
Peter, we must add a subspecies of the page type

06.11.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Capnodis carbonaria.

06.11.2015 1:16, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, thank you, everything works, Peter, and what the long-suffering is forgotten napomnit- popular)) ... And as it is now seen some krambidu in sailing - just remembered)

06.11.2015 0:53, Peter Khramov:

I corrected, and now everything is OK.

06.11.2015 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, the same story as that of Irene.
I set the parameters:
Tucson (from subgenus and above) Lepidoptera
Photographer : Vasiliy Feoktistov
search by geography and Notes : Train
Displayed page 11, but in the transition from the first page to any other still lost.Just not output the entire gallery after filling fields
Tucson (from subgenus and above) and Photographer
Deal with it, please.
The innovation necessary, especially when a fair number of photos at random and find the right already very problematic.

05.11.2015 23:38, Irina Nikulina:

Peter and I have something to do no longer find work in the gallery on the selection parameters (the old way, without driving in search of geography and Notes). Ie does not show the entire gallery. And for a given parameter in geography (tried and Kaluga region and in Primorsky Krai) - all good, but shows only the first page with the photo.In the transition to the second, etc.. - All photos disappear.

05.11.2015 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, no pichalek. We phoned to discuss this issue, the business somehow. The only thing I have from tomorrow jaw will not move too much, but it's just for a few days, so that where the thread on Tuesday can be arranged phoned in Skype.

To all: please look page http://insecta.pro/dub.htm
On it - a piece of the list of kinds of doubles, which is not the same generic name. Please do not change anything in these kinds of editing is not, and say what system / pattern in all this you see. To be able to automatically pochikat. And if you do not automatically get, then it will be automatic.

05.11.2015 22:36, Peter Khramov:

One more taxa tree check. About 1000 errors were fixed.

05.11.2015 21:24, Peter Khramov:

PS. The search is language-sensitive.

05.11.2015 21:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, a matter of principle, so I do not correctly understand the strategy of the site, and my actions must be monitored and corrected. Pechalka :(

05.11.2015 20:37, Peter Khramov:

Additional selection parameter in the gallery. Now, among other things, you can select images by any portion of the author's comment or location text. It's not Google, so we suggest you use the singular number or just the main parts of your search query words.

05.11.2015 20:29, Shamil Murtazin:

I think it's time to recall. Peter remind you! =)

05.11.2015 19:23, Peter Khramov:

Regarding foty: This is the second picture of the wings and the top of the first - the top wings in nature. With the sharpness of everything norms and God bless him, with the left wing. In addition, pictures of this kind of site is not enough. Therefore endure Fautua to add. gallery is not necessary - it does not make life easier for users, but just the opposite.The wishes of the author in such cases should not have much weight (as opposed to a situation where he wants to remove pritsipialno photos from the site on their own, personal reasons).
With regards to the discussions actions modders - we used this theme is not particularly raised where to discuss on the public or not. I think it's on the public and, if in a calm tone.

05.11.2015 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, like to listen to the grounds on which was removed my comment: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/13401
Please justify. That it was a criminal?

05.11.2015 19:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is such a thing as "Ethics", where, and how to express their opinion.

05.11.2015 17:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasily, I send Misha Danilevsky, he looks ...

05.11.2015 17:47, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

05.11.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Perhaps it will explain to the person who collects it and knows thence views.
The truth is I have such an opportunity will be no earlier than a month, alas (
Let until sp. Powys

05.11.2015 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I have every right (as well as any, other people) to express their opinion about this photo.
One person soglachen - the other is not: it is normal.
View photos and photos easily recognizable type of site, really small (
That is why I see no reason for the transfer to an additional gallery.
There is no need to hide ..
P.S.The more personal or abusive kriminaltngo I have not written.
I see no reason to continue the discussion here. There are more important things to do on the site, which should be done in the first ocherel.

05.11.2015 15:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Cover elytral confused, it is very spotty in the photo looks, so did not dare confidently, and auliensis there yet.

05.11.2015 15:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil and all moderators and curators, a big request, the action of moderators and facilitators, agreed with them, and certainly not consent to speak to the subject (to themselves attribute it too :)).
The real question http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/13401
Author picture does not agree with the definition, and requests to remove a picture. I agree with the definition, as well as three other determinants.But translate into an additional gallery (photo on our site are removed, in extreme cases (this is not the same), that would partially satisfy the demand of the author's photo. 6 more photos of this species is. Tselenopravleno or who transfer to an additional gallery does. Their actions I explained auto RU.Why were these instructions on the page photo? What you need to arrange for such disskusiyu labor question? or all the same action Report on such issues on their own? and then in the opposition, "Call of the subject" and discuss.

05.11.2015 14:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agapanthia detrita Kraatz, 1882?

05.11.2015 13:51, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapanthia / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 13:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Very small. It may not be one kind of such image - details not visible. Eugene, and it can not be larger scale?

05.11.2015 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Pieris / Yuri Semejkin.

05.11.2015 13:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Pieris / Yuri Semejkin.

05.11.2015 13:44, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapanthia soror / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 13:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapanthia soror / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 13:43, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapanthia soror / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I am also of the opinion that it is Erebia wanga, clearly visible on the spot, it is different in these species, and there is no middle. But I agree with you that the instance is not super.

05.11.2015 13:40, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapanthia soror / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erebia cyclopius / Yuriy Karpov Erebia wanga / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.11.2015 13:37, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dila laevicollis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 12:34, Fedor Ovechkin:

The same specimen. and at the same location as №20620, and various shooting time and coordinates do not coincide.

05.11.2015 12:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Erebia wanga Bremer, 1864

05.11.2015 11:47, Yuri Semejkin:

I looked both. As a result, I adhere to the viewpoint Yu Karpov. Justification: The location of a character of living, primarily C. At Vanga, at least on site veins, mild in contrast to Erebia cyclopius whose veining and layout clearer.
It is in any case not a statement, but rather a suggestion.But in general, I somehow do not understand why on the blur, not sharp pattern, so even without treatment underside went towards Wang.
Peter! I offer this not sharp and controversial picture delete values, he is not, but a good, specific samples will be more.

05.11.2015 11:31, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis pellucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 11:30, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis pellucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 11:28, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis pellucida / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

05.11.2015 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Heliconius.

05.11.2015 11:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Heliconius hecale Heliconius hecale zuleika.

05.11.2015 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Heliconius hecale / Tentatively identified / Lev Bely.

05.11.2015 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #14516 group.

05.11.2015 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Euploea core / Tentatively identified / Lev Bely.

05.11.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Euploea.

05.11.2015 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Euploea / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.11.2015 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Euploea / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.11.2015 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Euploea / Aleksey Gnilenkov.

05.11.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Euploea / Aleksey Gnilenkov.

05.11.2015 9:30, Fedor Ovechkin:

Determination to kind of have. Same as # 22298

05.11.2015 9:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

You can transfer.

05.11.2015 9:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

You can transfer.

05.11.2015 9:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

You can transfer.

05.11.2015 9:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

You can move to the genus. Or to mean?

05.11.2015 8:59, Fedor Ovechkin:

One group №14516.

05.11.2015 8:39, Fedor Ovechkin:

You can transfer.

05.11.2015 8:37, Fedor Ovechkin:

You can transfer.

05.11.2015 8:31, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euploea - comm. author.

05.11.2015 8:30, Fedor Ovechkin:

You can transfer: comm. author.

05.11.2015 0:45, Irina Nikulina:

I would also say that this wanga. Dual black spot at wanga smaller, less smooth (sdvoennost more noticeable) and bordering fuzzy, narrow, yellowish-reddish, only slightly lighter background in contrast to the pale yellow and have a wider cyclopius.

04.11.2015 22:00, Irina Nikulina:

I think it Idaea effusaria http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Sterrhinae/Idaea_effusaria.html

04.11.2015 21:41, Irina Nikulina:

http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=3419

04.11.2015 21:39, Irina Nikulina:

http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=3439#DSCN1483.JPG

04.11.2015 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Polydrusus Polydrusus tereticollis.

04.11.2015 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Polydrusus Polydrusus tereticollis.

04.11.2015 20:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Like ustakanilos with views, please move - Polydrusus tereticollis (De Geer, 1775)
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1005923

04.11.2015 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first member of this family are not numerous online.
But for now remains only up to a certain family - it's hard for me to them (
Aceraius grandis. Burmeister, 1847 ???
In the collection there are several uncertain and Asian passalid can download.
The only question is the same. In fact, to determine whether their photo?

04.11.2015 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Marumba cristata Marumba cristata titan.

04.11.2015 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Marumba cristata Marumba cristata titan.

04.11.2015 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I still took the Scarabaeoidea superfamily and is not listed in the BM divine form - with them not come off.
Mess it is everywhere and above all to do the work systematically and calmly finished one, picked up another :)

04.11.2015 17:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, do not tear his soul, there is no perfect system. The main thing that was kind of, and then try to bring in the divine form of families and genera. Vaughn butterflies for nearly a decade on the site, and work and even in the taxonomy. :)

04.11.2015 17:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, glanced briefly at the Curculionidae (you are there with Shamil views discussed) ... There is a full ... Almost the largest group! During where work! I'll try to Yuri Arzanova least for consultation attract - even where to get the system to the base. But it after ground beetles.

04.11.2015 15:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Not standard color pronotum with a very strong development of the black discal spots, but Cantharis obscura Linnaeus, 1758 also does not pull.

04.11.2015 15:56, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.11.2015 15:53, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cantharis fusca / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.11.2015 15:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Peter Khramov Evgeny Komarov.

04.11.2015 15:50, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Peter Khramov Evgeny Komarov.

04.11.2015 15:49, Evgeny Komarov:

OK! Thank you, Basil! We could give a hint to the window :)

04.11.2015 15:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, your number 74.
Instead of entering a user ID 0, which is determined.

04.11.2015 15:19, Evgeny Komarov:

To understand what defect MY: at random replaces 0 to 1, all turned out, however, this number is to think, for Peter fixed that :) I enter instead of 0?

04.11.2015 15:16, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agelastica alni / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

04.11.2015 15:15, Evgeny Komarov: Corrected data.

Not identified Donacia semicuprea / Tentatively identified / Peter Khramov.

04.11.2015 15:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Tested on a few vague photo: I enter a avtobodborom view, pointing accuracy of the, I press the "Update". I get: "Error loading commentary or data has not changed."

04.11.2015 14:37, Peter Khramov:

I remind you once again. Close Button banner - at the top right corner of it.

04.11.2015 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, you now must be accessible form of information transfer for the ph. Check, check whether all the rules. In the phone you do not get through, so I have something like this to check: -)

04.11.2015 14:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Very similar to Donacia semicuprea Panzer, 1796, the top angle of confidence is not enough.

04.11.2015 14:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Agelastica alni (L., 1758)

04.11.2015 14:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Lixus (Epimeces) ?cardui Olivier, 1807.

04.11.2015 13:31, Peter Khramov:

The people recall when downloading email in the definition of at least squad to zhuchisty, for example, could not take away certain foty beetles babochniki - butterflies and etc.

04.11.2015 12:08, Irina Nikulina:

Lacanobia aliena? http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id137069/
http://bioaltai-sayan.asu.ru/regnum/pict-a/photo/Lacanobia_aliena_fot.jpg

04.11.2015 12:06, Irina Nikulina:

Lacanobia contrastata?

04.11.2015 11:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Capnodis sexmaculata Ballion, 1871. Not quite sure.

04.11.2015 11:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Something from Central Oedemeridae. Even the race will not say.

04.11.2015 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Culicidae Chironomus.

04.11.2015 4:50, Yuri Semejkin:

But that is not correct? The family turned out in fact to others, and the race is now known.

04.11.2015 4:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Peter! I got it, now everything works.

04.11.2015 3:27, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, with a catalog of all the rules. I remind you that now "arbitrary taxon" should not just drive a certain value and to calm down, and you must wait avtopodstanovok and select option one. Then all will be the norm.

03.11.2015 23:37, Peter Khramov:

Eugene realized do.

03.11.2015 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.11.2015 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Larerannis orthogrammaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.11.2015 23:30, Peter Khramov:

Remove.

03.11.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Nemophora / Yuri Semejkin.

03.11.2015 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Nemophora / Yuri Semejkin.

03.11.2015 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Robot Yuri Semejkin.

03.11.2015 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Scopariinae.

03.11.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.11.2015 18:23, Irina Nikulina:

In the photo the most suitable option definitely think Chrysoteuchia pseudodiplogramma, was going to put in inaccurate, but seeing the description of all types of maritime Chrysoteuchia monograph VA Kirpichnikova, did not dare put up the form. 2 types - C.diplogramma and C. argentistriella very similar to pseudodiplogramma externally reliably differ only in the genitals.

03.11.2015 15:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Not working directory. Custom taxon nothing gives 40 region. Yesterday it was the same.

03.11.2015 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I have a kind which is not there dropped (see. The path): http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/193507 and it is necessary to remove it for nenabnostyu.
Rod, with the only kind I recreate again and where it should be. So, do not lose anything.

03.11.2015 14:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes beetles migrate from incorrect or vague definitions to the type of place! And that I rule in the comments or determinable, and Basil, or who else suffers. I'm here about.

03.11.2015 12:22, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, transfer photos to beetles - are you talking about? Foty to the types of drag or something else? By fotam in general - knew Oak.

03.11.2015 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Peter. I agree with Eugene about mentoring.
The beetles are dark wood and work for a long time to BM put in order.
Himself completely buried. To the extent that their photos placed just once (
Now we have to give it priority raking "Augean stables."

03.11.2015 9:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, his gray sprinkle ashes on his head, but the situation is such that both pictures and supervision of the beetle families, I simply do not pull, while replacing I do not see myself with zhuchem and believe me there will be more confused. it is here.Basil is one not pull, and together we'd be able to put things in order is not all families so that took up the photos of the considerations that the site was a purely "Lepidoptera" and help in supervising some groups, not being an expert, I do not see the point . Now the situation is different. Including Shamil albeit in a "war" with fotami.Once again allow me to propose to transfer photos to the beetles, the double meaning of the two people do not see.

03.11.2015 2:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Male. Determined Makarchenko EA BPI FEB RAS.

03.11.2015 2:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Chironomus sp (family Chironomidae). Determined Makarchenko EA BPI FEB RAS.

02.11.2015 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, with fotami how are you?

02.11.2015 21:48, Ivan Tislenko:

"There is absolutely no octopunctatus black legs ..." - on the contrary ???

02.11.2015 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea aversata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.11.2015 21:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan, I have to answer your question noticed that vgruzil Solyanka - corrected already! In octopunctatus not absolutely black legs and a little picture on the pronotum.

02.11.2015 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Platycerus caprea / Confidently identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

02.11.2015 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Platycerus caprea / Confidently identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

02.11.2015 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lethrus / Confidently identified / Male / Evgeny Komarov.

02.11.2015 20:59, Ivan Tislenko:

I do not remember why identified "my" skrytoglavov (# 46999, # 47000, # 47003) as a Cryptocephalus octopunctatus. How do they differ from Cryptocephalus cordiger (http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1002401)?

P.S. I looked at photos on the Internet - like at Cryptocephalus cordiger foot light, while Cryptocephalus octopunctatus - black. If so, some of these same http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1002401 Cryptocephalus octopunctatus?

02.11.2015 20:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Rather Lethrus (s.str. Understanding GV Nikolaev). The choice of about three - L. scoparius Fisch., L.bituberculatus, L. turkestanicus, (taking into account the place). But the picture does not allow the details to see why Lethrus sp. It will be correct.

02.11.2015 19:41, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea aversata

02.11.2015 19:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Platycerus caprea (De Geer, 1774)

02.11.2015 17:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Hydria flavipes / Irina Nikulina.

02.11.2015 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Acronicta raphael / Irina Nikulina.

02.11.2015 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Promalactis / Yuri Semejkin.

02.11.2015 16:14, Irina Nikulina:

I wrote about two kinds of 4, which is difficult to differ in appearance, apparently similar to enopisema and live in Primorye. This does not mean that only these listed Sinev 2, there are all 5 that you have below. And, of course, quite possible, and even more of their views will be added over time.

02.11.2015 16:04, Yuri Semejkin:

In blue is not all collected. Other sources say the number of different types of islands Promalactis. For some, their 7 species in the Far East. In Primorye 5 species-P. venustella, P. jezonica, P. svetlanae, P. parki and P. sinevi. In 39 regions, the Japanese said about P. enopisema. And all this against the background of insufficient knowledge mikrolepidoptery.

02.11.2015 15:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Thank you, Vladimir! Combining now zabymshi :) Apparently recently released from puparium instance, because lighter and chitin.

02.11.2015 14:29, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Good work! Such light never met.
Judging from the perch, the same instance. Then it is necessary to group.

02.11.2015 12:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Given that I'm doing the same ... everything returns to normal. With time :)

02.11.2015 11:58, Irina Nikulina:

Larerannis orthogrammaria. In type 2 37 reg Larerannis, the second (filipjevi) - another form of the bond.

02.11.2015 0:03, Irina Nikulina:

The Japanese have the form enopisema there is an indication that the four species of this genus - P.enopisema, P. parki, P. svetlanae and P. striola - seemingly difficult-and reliably determined only on the genitals. Of these species, two - parki and svetlanae - Sinev specified in Primorye, so there may well be one of them

01.11.2015 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From myself I warn about bugs.
Now the hard drag here and there, rename, etc. many taxa (I am trying to build a more or less adequate system), and so it is likely these moments with the loss of illustrations.
What to do: it seems inevitable (

01.11.2015 22:08, Igor Ivannikov:

Instead of 39337 photos.

01.11.2015 22:07, Igor Ivannikov:

Instead of 39336 photos.

01.11.2015 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did not delete my post :)
Normally I do not have this habit.
My post dated 01.11.2015 8:43 (only today) has been, and remains in place.

01.11.2015 21:37, Ivan Tislenko:

Understood thanks!

01.11.2015 21:06, Igor Ivannikov:

Instead of 27457 photos.

01.11.2015 21:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Shamil, I'm with Vasily about Volgograd neighborhood :) He alone office, to which I replied, somehow deleted.

01.11.2015 20:47, Irina Nikulina:

Ivan, on the question of the absence of a thumbnail to the tribe answer you immediately, so as not to clog the page taxa not related matters, it's more a technical question rather than on the classification :) Recent changes in the structure of taxa has led to the fact that indeed some of them were left without illustrations, for example,in the case of intermediate taxon. This is not an isolated case, so periodically review all units, and has already found a lot of these here taxa without thumbnails, correct) On some "holes" inform users thank Fedor Ovechkin, his efforts illustrated more than 30 taxa caught without thumbnail.But to catch everything - not enough time, so please find more - inform immediately or in the LC. Better not on the page taxon - why there is an extra correspondence relating not just to the taxon, and to any technical problem.

01.11.2015 18:49, Shamil Murtazin:

What other semi-desert? .. I have mixed forest around there :)

01.11.2015 11:40, Irina Nikulina:

Now she is in the other. Kind, apparently - Hydria flavipes

01.11.2015 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia fugax / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia fugax / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia fugax / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 11:22, Evgeny Komarov:

While there is no good picture, even a picture of the male hanging.

01.11.2015 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia fugax / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 10:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, where we have in semi-desert truffles? :) In some mushrooms, clear, and only what Allah knows. In fact it is the only such case. Usually during the season 1-3 ind., Usually in the evening on the fly in the wooded ravines.

01.11.2015 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Rhodinia fugax / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Rhodinia fugax / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 10:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Rhodinia fugax / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhodinia jankowskii / Alexandr Zhakov Rhodinia fugax / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 10:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Rhodinia fugax

01.11.2015 10:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhodinia jankowskii / Alexandr Zhakov Rhodinia fugax / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 10:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhodinia jankowskii / Alexandr Zhakov Rhodinia fugax / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 10:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhodinia jankowskii / Alexandr Zhakov Rhodinia fugax / Yuri Semejkin.

01.11.2015 10:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! A point will be set? I'm still an option for Rhodinia fugax. Subspecies probably diana. The shape of the wings suitable previous stage and feed the same.
One thing I do not understand. At all seen the pictures in the internet sling more clearly and not flooded like me. Shot one in one is not found.

01.11.2015 8:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What else but them then?
If tens of falling, I applaud, because the first time I hear about such :)

01.11.2015 6:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, certainly not only truffles :) Tens fell into the trap in the form of a conventional narrow forest belt in the midst of the wilderness, there is no exact truffles.

01.11.2015 1:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Batozonellus fuliginosus (Klug, 1834)

01.11.2015 1:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Batozonellus fuliginosus (Klug, 1834)

31.10.2015 18:23, Shamil Murtazin:

and whom does he eat?

31.10.2015 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It must be born in the Batozonellus Arnold, 1937 : http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/981714 add a kind of Batozonellus fuliginosus (Klug, 1834)
Add necessary based on this source: http://www.waspweb.org/Afrotropical_wasps/ (it is already in the database).
As soon as the view - once photos are 2 copies of Namibia (no view I do not want to set).

31.10.2015 1:36, Irina Nikulina:

Acronicta raphael, I think

31.10.2015 1:09, Peter Khramov:

If a person is interested, and he did understand why it is necessary, it does. If not - then no.
Irina, takes over until your pickup deciphered, revealed more amusing glitches with doubles, now they try poreshat in the (semi) automatic machine, and then I'll give out lists of prospective takes, and it will be possible to have changed hands traversed.We have here, among other things, have fun, when the type is not in the genus called on this family. And in this case, too, the subgenus in the database do not. In general, it will be something to ponder at leisure.

31.10.2015 0:33, Irina Nikulina:

At first too it seemed very simple, but not laid down for any kind of WFD) But in Rheumaptera not even looking for the RF only 3 species in Sinev - known hecata, hastata and subhastata (for 37 reg last 2) decided today to look at all the same Japanese and Korean Rheumaptera and I think that hereRheumaptera flavipeshttp://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentiinae/Rheumaptera_flavipes_flavipes.html to Sinev for the Russian it is not, but found that the collection of the Siberian Zoological Museum, there is also indicated for the Amur and Primorye http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/Geometr/larent.htm

31.10.2015 0:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now we need one thing: that the person actually worked.
Unfortunately, there are instances when a person agrees to oversee something, but in fact this man KTU is at zero (
Work with the system - a lot of great. Judging by beetles, but certainly in other taxa such as unfavorable situation ....Therefore it is necessary for people to really work, and curators were not purely "for show" :)

30.10.2015 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Schizotus fuscicollis / Yuri Semejkin.

30.10.2015 16:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.10.2015 16:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2015 16:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2015 16:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema hecabe / Imago Eurema brigitta / Female.

30.10.2015 16:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2015 16:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2015 15:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2015 15:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2015 15:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2015 15:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2015 15:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, there are two pictures identified to genus, from Vietnam to test a determinant. :))

30.10.2015 15:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema hecabe Eurema andersoni.

30.10.2015 15:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema hecabe Eurema andersoni.

30.10.2015 15:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tired of guessing this kind, so I did the determinant of the keys to SE Asia

30.10.2015 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Podonta daghestanica / Denis Potanin Omophlus proteus / Evgeny Komarov.

30.10.2015 15:22, Evgeny Komarov:

It pyltseed Proteus (Omophlus proteus). Do not trust the pictures online :) Peter, give the opportunity to transfer pictures in the beetles!

30.10.2015 14:09, Irina Nikulina:

Well, that tightened the Far East ...) Peter, how did you manage to persuade the deputy. Director of Biology and Soil ??) very busy man.

30.10.2015 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.10.2015 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Yuri! I tried several times to download from the subspecies and where something was wrong. :)

30.10.2015 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tatiana Selena Irina Nikulina.

30.10.2015 12:54, Irina Nikulina:

I think there can be accurate and, albonotaria without white eye in a dark spot is not uncommon. On RDV only 2 types Xerodes, and rufescentaria another.

30.10.2015 12:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! And you got the case is not a typo.?. I am watching a picture and in addition to the definition of Ira there was nothing. And now for some reason, the definition is Tatiana.

30.10.2015 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.10.2015 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.10.2015 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.10.2015 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Dmitriy Pozhogin.

30.10.2015 9:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

The definition is not mine, based on the statements of the moderators!

30.10.2015 9:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Schizotus fuscicollis (Mannerheim, 1853) (Pyrochroidae)

30.10.2015 8:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lopinga achine karafutonis / Confidently identified / Tatiana Selena.

30.10.2015 8:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieris Pieris brassicae.

30.10.2015 8:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are, in relation to the little flower butterfly.

30.10.2015 4:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Fly Xerodes albonotaria (Bremer, 1864)?

30.10.2015 3:00, Peter Khramov:

Eugene Makarchenko agreed to oversee the Chironomidae, Nymphomyiidae, Deuterophlebiidae and Blephariceridae.

30.10.2015 1:13, Irina Nikulina:

Lopinga achine karafutonis Matsumura, 1928

29.10.2015 18:20, Peter Khramov:

Possible without avtopodstanovok, a simple search on the literature page. 106 - a reference to a page and not to the site as a whole. How to refer correctly to the sites - an ambiguous question, but if the city directory, kanesh, this issue should be poreshat immediately.

29.10.2015 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Download the book or article is not a problem, the problem is not the second time to download or find already downloaded. Many search takes time. autosubstitution not tried. (may well be found, tried. can), but what to do with the publication: [106] noctuidae.de, 2011. Drasteria christophi (Alphéraky, 1895). http://www.noctuidae.de/page/art/christophiAlpheraky.html [106] is a particular page or site? It seems to have agreed to ship only to entire sites. You can download literature authors ship with gray literature. :)
Barsevskis A. et al. 2015. Cerambycidae of the World: http://cerambycidae.org/. [194] all clear, author of the website, year, title, address. But what if next year will updatings 2016 re-shipping site? And what's drlegrain.be , I'm there or anything not found. And this is there :))

29.10.2015 16:48, Peter Khramov:

Yes no no "inside" ... There is a set of fields to fill Loading ...

29.10.2015 16:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, I would suggest that the principle of a regular catalog, ie shipping books to taxonomic groups, and inside of the authors and the year. This principle will not, if people will not fit into the "patterns" and TB requirements of state standards, which are constantly changing what for. It will be more convenient for anyone to use.At the same time, the same work can be linked to several taxonomic groups. It is, to thinking :)

29.10.2015 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Yes, Fyodor, this opportunity will have all the pictures, regardless of the type specimen (collector / in nature).

29.10.2015 14:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

According to the latest remarks Anatoly and Petr think it is important to clarify that there are not talking only about the pictures collection samples, but from nature. For example, there is a qualitative picture of the length of about 3000 pixels, and it is already uploaded to the site, and before it is reduced to, say, 1280 or 900 pixels in length in order to maintain quality.It is important that it was possible to restart the same picture with higher resolution when it would be technically possible.

29.10.2015 13:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) I think the most important thing is the translation. Just myself constantly forget about it.

29.10.2015 13:23, Peter Khramov:

We will make the ability to update foty for better (eg, the same copies peresnyatye with the new camera / light), and at the same time dolepim additional load. size.

29.10.2015 13:20, Peter Khramov:

Basil, these cuts are made in the book is not a good life, and from a lack of space. The site is the place all the rules and increase the number of the buttons on the 3% of the overall labor costs is also not particularly affected. Therefore, there is no reason to. Except, perhaps, the volume kopipasta. But this is not the case.So I suggest not to complicate the life of the user or interpreter, or Yandex with Google.

29.10.2015 12:54, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

In this case, it would be good to provide an opportunity to restart and for large photo quality.

29.10.2015 12:30, Peter Khramov:

Basil, so no difference in the same height, not the height. Still in the TV it will not fit.
Ivan, about 4K - it's not exotic. The thing is statistics. That's Full-HD is now already a hundred years if not exotic. Do you know how much goes to the site with a lower resolution than Full-HD? Almost 80%. And, for example, 1280 benefit of the people no less than the same Full-HD.Such is uncomplicated statistics on the site in the last quarter.
In mind, I think, needs just one more to do the size of the future. Ie sculpt large (virtually unlimited) foty not in lieu of the present size, and besides him. Over time, the opportunity to do so.

29.10.2015 10:06, Ivan Tislenko:

Irina, thanks for the reply. In general, as I understand it, it is encouraged to ship high-quality photos in virtually any kind.
Peter, if the site is supposed to "forever" in a few years 4K monitors are no longer exotic. From your answer, I realized that the only disadvantage of high resolution photos have been added - is the speed of loading pages.

29.10.2015 9:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

29.10.2015 5:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I think that your question is about increasing the size of the adjustment, which is inevitable in a vertical frame)))

29.10.2015 5:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So it is generally accepted sokrasheniya.
They are used even in the "school" opredelitedyah insects and stands pronotum and elytra.
If writing completely - it turns out "many letters" :)

29.10.2015 3:40, Peter Khramov:

People, if not deadly difficult, let's write a human. I mean the "PRSP" and "ndkr."

29.10.2015 3:33, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Tettigonioidea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Onomarchus uninotatus / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

29.10.2015 2:23, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and where an explanation of something in your comments?)

29.10.2015 0:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, for the collection of beetles are almost always done a vertical shot. It is common practice.
I attribute this to the fact that in the collection boxes, they are usually vertically.
In this case the picture is always greater height than width.Even with my old soap dish picture if a large beetle, it turns out a lot more in pixels in height than the size taken on the site and must be reduced.
A TV set in my drum a photo: vertical or horizontal. Anyway, should engage with the :)

29.10.2015 0:10, Peter Khramov:

For Future Reference Record. But we have to be than those. also part of the chela plant, editing is all about the people. Bo people in any downloadable templates have missed their literary sources ...

29.10.2015 0:08, Peter Khramov:

Please explain why you need photos of beetles that do not fit on one screen Full-HD monitor / televizoara. If for the sake of the fragments, then please explain why (if the movie really need, for example, to illustrate the distinguishing feature) did not upload individual pictures it as a movie. If anything, I have no banter. Really I do not understand.Technical problems at the same site in order to have foty larger maximum size (compared with the present) I do not watch. What tyrit will often - yes. Well loaded brake on the slow tyrnete ...

28.10.2015 23:18, Irina Nikulina:

Ivan, on the main gallery and more. I can not find out what the topic is discussed in detail (and perhaps it was the news of the site), but this division is just intended Peter to the gallery there was "an abundance of pictures of the same species, taken in the same region "as Eugene wrote.The plan was to leave only the main gallery-quality photos from different angles, the most successful and fully illustrate the characteristics of the type and stage of all. The selection criteria for the main picture gallery is not just discussed. At the same time, users will be able to view photos and more from the gallery.Here it is tested on Swallowtail. Over time, I think it will be done with others. Taxa. A common sense - yes, I agree, should be included in order not to load a low-quality picture for those species where sufficient quality.It only makes sense if there are no photos to view in general, or for a new site to the point, or rare species, a photo which is generally difficult to do in nature. Very occasionally do so (before even explains why :) http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/23764) It also happens that those 5 who are already loaded to the point, obviously inferior quality or smaller.

28.10.2015 22:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Keep Alexander and Irina. Somehow "Literature" we proved reduced only to the justification taksna places (and even then - can be a "personal message" to do). We ought to work and links to be able to give the pages staksonov (any), etc. And to find anything today for a certain group ... not knowing, for example, the author.

28.10.2015 21:39, Fedor Ovechkin:

Onomarchus uninotatus, is inaccurate.

28.10.2015 21:21, Ivan Tislenko:

Near the collection there, but some idea how difficult it is. Here most of those who already have a high-quality "collectible" picture. On the other hand, not so much, and when they appear, they can be solved individually.

28.10.2015 21:20, Evgeny Komarov:

What about "politics." I was also somewhat confused by the abundance of pictures of the same species, taken in the same region. I do not see much sense, but no restrictions established. Relying on common sense. I assume that if this type of images on the site do not have, for example, from the XYZ area, I can post a picture, even if they are already there ten.Well, if this region is already published 5-10, why? Possibly, in the future, it is worth some limitations and enter.

28.10.2015 21:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, it is a matter of the author's photo. If he believes that the quality of its image suffers from the limitation of 800 pixels. Vertical, who stirs put in horizontal on 1200. Here are just a collection of pictures here is very little.I am very hesitant to spread that spread now from his collection (ancient pictures soap box more than a decade ago, and even initially reduced to its database). But decided that the best is at least something. There are better, it can be removed.Shooting (qualitative) collection specimens - work slow and time-consuming. Even if you do not layered photos using a microscope (it is primarily about small beetles), you still need to degrease beetle (clear), sometimes pereraspravit, put the lights, tripod and other ...This piece-work, requiring huge investment of time even with all the necessary equipment.

28.10.2015 21:03, Ivan Tislenko:

In general, what the policy of the site - you need photo species, and so that bulk? For example, swallowtail? And in this sense means "main gallery" and "General Gallery"?

28.10.2015 20:59, Ivan Tislenko:

If these limitations are not artificial, then it is understandable. Maybe then "collectible" photos (high quality especially beetles) ask spread in landscape orientation?

28.10.2015 20:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Ivan, I agree with you that as long as online photo size is not sufficient to demonstrate the capabilities of modern macro example photos from the site of the Zoological undeniably calls "to strive for the heights" (along with pictures Makarova and a number of other authors, where, incidentally, there is a very bad shots , high resolution which does not help), but,as I understand it, is the technical (and financial) capabilities do not allow. Here http://carabidae.org/gallery limits are the same, but the quality of it is due to the selection and placement of photos of high quality. Here, too, there is a dilemma - to illustrate as many species, or, at the expense of quantity, placing only high quality pictures.IMHO, the truth is in the middle.

28.10.2015 20:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, I would add. Anatoly, you are out of my comments on the "dry" instance of this problem was taken ... Just dealt with the unfortunate term, and its replacement by "collection" I am quite satisfied. Why were selected for some more features, I do not really understand.It is important that the live view (absolutely no difference, staging frame or natural catch photos) and a copy of the dried collection look much differently, most especially color. This is significant to illustrate the species.Pose, background and other characteristics of interest, but this is beyond illustrating appearance. Well, excuse me, what difference a good shot beetle (butterfly) on the meadow or in cages in the room? It somehow affects the use of the photo to identify species? So just I do not understand you here a detailed discussion about the purpose of selection.For example, I use only a selection of taxonomic groups, and how (excluding image quality) and where filmed, I was not very important. Therefore, in my understanding, the purpose of the photo screening - to find an image of the form of interest. A listed two parameters (live specimen and dry in the collection) is quite enough.

28.10.2015 20:15, Ivan Tislenko:

Anatoly, at the moment that you are offering practically realized, in my opinion is quite enough. I think that is not very good with the collection photos. Unlike natural images can be done with the highest quality and resolution. (See, for example, on the site of ZIN). Limitations on the site would not allow them to put in all its glory.In addition, the traditional "collectible" photo spread in a vertical orientation, which further degrades the quality.

28.10.2015 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Oxydia / Evgeny Komarov.

28.10.2015 15:45, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Something complete silence society on the targeting selection of photos. Continue. If to select two objectives: (1 Selecting photos from the collections of samples. 2. Selection of photos of samples in the natural surroundings and pose.) Which, as I understand, Peter almost agree - then such signs "Insect on a photo in the collection" for the selection of targets and the first "Live insect shot in the wild" for the selection of the second goal. The remaining photos are no indication as their selection is not required. If the will be other proposals for the purposes of the selection of photos, signs offer another option for selection.

28.10.2015 14:43, Irina Nikulina:

Xanthorhoe abraxina? http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=466507

28.10.2015 14:43, Irina Nikulina:

Xanthorhoe abraxina? http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=466507

28.10.2015 14:40, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula nigropunctata?

28.10.2015 14:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema hecabe Eurema blanda.

28.10.2015 14:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.10.2015 13:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why not simulatrix, obyasnyu- seen that a beast larger 20 mm. Zigzag on the underside of the lower not continuous (intermittent)

28.10.2015 13:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.10.2015 13:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Eurema Eurema hecabe.

28.10.2015 13:39, Fedor Ovechkin:

Judging by the flower, the length of the front wing approx. 3 cm.

28.10.2015 13:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Diaphania / Lev Bely.

28.10.2015 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Diaphania / Lev Bely.

28.10.2015 12:47, Fedor Ovechkin:

And this kind to

28.10.2015 12:45, Fedor Ovechkin:

Determination to kind of have.

28.10.2015 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eurema Eurema hecabe.

28.10.2015 12:37, Fedor Ovechkin:

Determination to kind of have.

28.10.2015 12:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

hecabe

28.10.2015 12:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

the size required if more than 2 cm - hecabe

28.10.2015 12:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eurema / Imago / Alex Dumchus Eurema hecabe / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2015 12:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

size needed

28.10.2015 12:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.10.2015 12:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eurema / Alex Dumchus Eurema hecabe / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2015 12:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

E. hecabe male

28.10.2015 12:02, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, in the "popular" confusion again (3 Accidentally now immediately saw was the view - a lot (Lentochnitsa - Praydidae, large tortoiseshell - Crambidae, ognёvka - Pieridae, Hyles - Pyralidae well, etc. Until today, periodically glancing - everything was fine

28.10.2015 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eurema / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2015 10:30, Fedor Ovechkin:

There is a definition to the kind you can carry.

27.10.2015 22:51, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, understand very well what is talking about Alexander and support, I do not just want to raise this subject ahead)
If this list would need only a narrow purpose - to indicate the literary / online source when the upload information on a particular taxon, then yes, it would be more or less convenient search works fine.Well, if I, for example, you want to see a list of already downloaded articles assume foreign authors available on a particular subject, taxon, and so on. D.? Angling them from this list of long and uncomfortable.Or, say, there is a need (and this happens quite often) to refer to a comment or description of the form to an article or a book that had once been loaded in the literature py, but do not know her number, and I do not remember the first author or title (Well this sometimes happens) - and you have to look at this in the transition to the expanded list of necessary insects.You can still give some examples, but it is easier to say that working with such a list uncomfortable. And, of course, I'm all for a systematic list / directory of literature in which it would be easy to navigate. For a start, at least on orders divided.

27.10.2015 21:19, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Eugene, thank you! Links really seen a difference.

27.10.2015 21:16, Peter Khramov:

If we are looking for, knowing the number, the search by looking for a page number hammering. If we are looking for, knowing the author / title, then the search by looking for the page, driving the author or title. Something may be faster this option?
If you do not make a fuss for the sake of clarification the issue, they say, there is already in the list or not, and for the creation of a catalog of literature - a different matter.Then it is necessary to mold at every sub and other sorting.
ZY And what work load for certain types without "literature"? Neither the first nor in the second case of the above it does not facilitate the work to the general list.

27.10.2015 21:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Vladimir, your picture is quite well lets see the details (hats off). From fuscipes well different proportions PRSP and ndkr. Here Vasily rights. External differences between these two species can be distinguished on the photo Konstantin Grebennikov Online Zoological: http://www.zin.ru/animalia/COLEOPTERA/rus/paefuskg.htm and http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/Coleoptera/rus /paeripkg.htm

27.10.2015 19:57, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Basil and Paederus riparius different than, for example, Paederus fuscipes.

27.10.2015 19:23, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Peter! I do not choose the target selection. It solved without me, I can make signs on selected targets.

27.10.2015 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paederus riparius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.10.2015 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paederus riparius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.10.2015 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paederus riparius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.10.2015 18:09, Peter Khramov:

Anatoly, Eugene meant that sometimes collectible items can lose / change color. That is, for example, a live cockroach is always blue, and dried - always pale lousy.But in this case it is obvious it is not necessary to mold the excess value of the flag, and simply indicate in the comments to the photos, they say, look, here it is not quite as it should be. In addition, the distortion when shooting has often come and live nasekomyshey, especially with metallic color. Like here: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/45377.And comments in such cases, of course, very desirable.

27.10.2015 17:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, a question! :) I, but probably not only, I look with a slight shudder in the direction of partition "Literature" on the site, such as measures to restore to him the order. :) As I do not know, but literature and websites should be separated, even with continuous numbering.In alphabetical order, Latin and Cyrillic, and even if possible separately according to the authors, separately for the title, it would be convenient to look for. All the time, very carefully add the new job, I try to only in exceptional cases where the type of photos already uploaded to the site. This includes articles, which describes one or more species.Audits and directories where many kinds of ship safely. It may work for certain types of shipping on a page types without the "Literature" ?

27.10.2015 16:59, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

"natural coloring - it is quite serious Well"
10.24.2015 17:12 Evgeny Komarov - It is important that it is a living without color change.
10/24/2015 9:27 Evgeny Komarov - it is important that this insect has a natural color

27.10.2015 16:54, Peter Khramov:

Eeh ...

27.10.2015 16:40, Peter Khramov:

And what is the third? If the natural color - it will train lightly at all. Or not?

27.10.2015 16:23, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Peter! Yes, for God's sake, let it be like to be, but to address the specific objectives of the three mentioned by me quite three signs. But if we leave two goals, the two, but the features naturally change slightly. No I do not insist on anything, if there is no desire to make a qualitative selection, then it is not necessary, especially since no one interested in the improvement of selection.

27.10.2015 15:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And not only Stas

27.10.2015 15:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And let ka this Saturday at Nino come, we just drinking bout planned on the occasion of my AP and Korb should be)))

27.10.2015 15:17, Peter Khramov:

I mean, my comments about the clean look was serious.

27.10.2015 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, are you talking about?

27.10.2015 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Letogenes festalis.

27.10.2015 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Letogenes festalis.

27.10.2015 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Letogenes festalis / Yuri Semejkin.

27.10.2015 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Anatoli, about the selection, I wrote to the fact that, well, if at all left a man will go to the gallery, and he will not understand what this feature is selected for it, it is intuitively quite a understand (at least in general terms) what it was.
About values.In the gallery of the vast majority of images - a picture straightened copies of entomological collections or shooting live insects under natural conditions. Accordingly, by the discussed feature, we first separate the one from the other. Wherein:
1. In both options crawl and some left foty.Type zamorennyye life setting or dead insects in nature. And God bless them. Their number is very small, and if the person meets this photo, nothing terrible will happen, just skip it and everything.
2. The user may need selection of similar features (such as a live / dead), and then it will be more difficult.
And at the same time:
3.A large number of characteristic values ​​and explanations to it once again confuses and scares foty how to load and view them. Given all this, I believe that values ​​have this feature should be only two, even if they do not fully meet 100% of photos on the site, but only 99.Actually, the name they are unlikely to come up with a good, but if you come up with - good.
ZY About the same sign as such, they regularly use (seen in the statistics), but because he
A) as such need.
B) it is useful in its present form.

27.10.2015 14:29, Peter Khramov:

It would be nice to start to come to Moscow and share some tea or vodka. But if the case is not yet released from the LV, the call right now, poboltams, why and how.

27.10.2015 14:21, Peter Khramov:

I hoped that Dima has time to step up and continue the flashmob. But, you see, did not grow together.

27.10.2015 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) No, Yuri, I'm Peter comments on sistimatike, is performed only if agreed. :) Your Information, Information Ira, as a result of the findings throughout the race.

27.10.2015 11:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter, so I just wrote, that did not pass by, corrected and explained to the others. Why sample. And it turned out as an order, especially with your exclamation.

27.10.2015 11:42, Irina Nikulina:

Many have heard of this moth purple eastern (forage plant - Amur lilac), and have seen with my own eyes for the first time .. to get on the mass flight. On the first evening in the Tiger almost struck trees with no leaves, but blossoms - all covered this seriaria, not only trees, but also all around the puddles and streams.These butterflies resting sprawled wings on the water, holding lumps of soil, small stones. Wings do not get wet. Disturbed - take off easily with water. They write that even tightened under the fast-flowing water, they are easy to take off and emerges ("Key to us. DDA" v.5, part 5, page 507)

27.10.2015 10:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I tortured worn on trips, but after the November holidays ready, so to speak proceed. Just what I needed to do, and I for the summer season was lost to such changes in the site)))

27.10.2015 8:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

27.10.2015 8:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ivan Ivanov Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2015 8:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Blanca Prado Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2015 8:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ivan Ivanov Blanca Prado.

27.10.2015 8:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Ivan Ivanov.

27.10.2015 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Tentatively identified / Ivan Ivanov.

27.10.2015 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

27.10.2015 8:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chasminodes albonitens Chasminodes.

27.10.2015 8:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chasminodes / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.10.2015 4:57, Peter Khramov:

Remove a view!

27.10.2015 3:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Remove views

27.10.2015 3:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Consult with Matt, -Reset him a few shots from different years Chasminodes. Here's his verdict. In Primorye, about 10 species of Chasminodes .All develop on limes. Differences species only genital
So it turns out that all the species determination, if not given details about the study genitals should be cleaned, leaving only the genus.Along the way, I have a question to the genus Chasminodes appeared. Leaving alone the imago, take a look at the larvae and pupae. They are that all species are also the same? Time and development stage all the same?
Ps. It would not hurt to try povyraschivat possible, to see all stages, including the transfer of adults spice for analysis genitalia.And then compare what can and will determine the kind of visual clue or do not appear. Same result.

27.10.2015 1:18, Irina Nikulina:

I would also say that most ussurica, but it is only through the images on the network. A catalog has Sinev remark to mean ussurica: «All kinds of indications from the Russian territory with the exception of the holotype, should be attributed to Ourapteryx koreana Inoue, 1993 (note E.A.Belyaeva). The article Inoue H «On Ourapteryx persica-complex, with descriptions of three new species» (1993) describes ussurica. Descriptions koreana and direct comparisons ussurica and koreana not found.It would be necessary to ask the experts what external differences between these two species, and whether they are at all.

27.10.2015 0:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieris melete / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

26.10.2015 22:32, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, always forget to ask, but what about the separation of double taxa dogs? It was very convenient.

26.10.2015 22:29, Irina Nikulina:

Pieris melete, female second generation

26.10.2015 22:02, Irina Nikulina:

On RDV 8 species Chasminodes. Of these, with white wings and unexpressed outer sash - 6 species. On most photos on the network - at pseudalbonitens, ussurica wings pure white, have bremeri, aino and sugii - VC with a thin black discal stroke, while albonitens (on jpmoth y male) - with discal dot. So maybe there albonitens. Yet in Remark (Remark) to the form here http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3899_Chasminodes/3899_Chasminodes_albonitens/Chasminodes_albonitens.htm indicates that the last four species are difficult to distinguish externally. They discussed the color of the abdominal segments, do not really understand, but in any case, the picture is not visible. There http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=2145 all very different variations of strokes and points by type. In Kononenko in the "Key to the insects DDA" is 5 hours.4, page 387 6 types of external differences are not specified, only genital. So, I think, better inaccurate. But the photo on molbiole http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=408115&view=findpost&p=1280440, that determines our website here this picture http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/24239, put together with others, as "almost all of the obvious." Maybe someone knows about the external differences, if any?

26.10.2015 16:31, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Select on the basis of easy, I write about weak goal selection of which constitutes priznaki..Dopustim, you can list the targets of selection: 1. The selection of photos from the collection of the samples 2. Selection of photos of samples with unaltered color photos 3. Selection of samples in a natural environment and position, etc.After approval of the objectives drawn up a set of (1 - 4) signs for the decision goals, is a description of each and give them names. What is now possible to select on the grounds, I noted above - 10/26/2015 12:35

26.10.2015 15:23, Peter Khramov:

You can simply select the gallery foty on this basis now. And the difference will be visible without any further explanation. If there foty that it is unclear where to refer - let references discuss.

26.10.2015 14:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Chasminodes albonitens (Bremer, 1861) ?

26.10.2015 14:09, Yuri Semejkin:

I put in inaccurate. On others. Photographs eyes "bug-eyed" and is not seen. Wanted more one looked.

26.10.2015 12:46, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Currently, the generic name Batozonellus Arnold, 1937 is summarized in the synonyms to Parabatozonus Yasumatsu, 1936, as a more senior title. Synonymy justified in the book:
Loktionov VM, Cherish A. spider wasp (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) Russian Far East. - Vladivostok: Dal'nauka 2014.
So, the correct name for this species is palaearctic Parabatozonus lacerticida (Pallas, 1771).

Hunt spiders of the family Araneidae.

26.10.2015 12:35, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Now I think that with the signs still worse. Symptoms are described (24.10.2015 0:44), but their purpose (10.24.2015 13:23) is not clear. What kind of photos you can take away? When live insects, there because Claim 1 includes the non-living. If the photo in nature, not as Staged in captivity and are also included in item 1. If you need a photo collection, either, because in step 2 enter and collected only for photo copies. Etc.So before you look for the name of the signs, I think, need to articulate objective selection of them, then you can specify them and descriptions will be clear only after the name. So far as I understand from the comments, everyone understands it is ambiguous. Reject, but think.

25.10.2015 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lonchoptera / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

25.10.2015 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Anatoly, the meaning of attribute values ​​I explained above (10.24.2015 0:44). The product colors are not to blame.

25.10.2015 15:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.10.2015 15:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Hemistola zimmermanni / Yuri Semejkin.

25.10.2015 13:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Leucorrhinia rubicunda / Marina Yolkina.

25.10.2015 12:50, Irina Nikulina:

This is a photo of the group. Leucorrhinia rubicunda

25.10.2015 12:05, Irina Nikulina:

By Sinev in Primorye 6 species Hydrelia. But already mentioned here, there are 3 types of similar - http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/31923 may also Hydrelia musculata?

25.10.2015 11:31, Basil Sergienko:

Hydrelia sp., That there is, on the blueness

25.10.2015 8:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Since the views are different, I make a clarification. In general, Alexander, I copied the wrong line, instead Acria ceramitis Meyrick, 1908 should be read almost as in the article "Acria nivalis" Why almost, now called butterfly Letogenes festalis Meyrick, 1930

25.10.2015 7:04, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Well, most of the time concerned only the transfer color, and you can simply call - "The natural color of the insect" and "other cases" do not know when or if you know exactly what the color has changed.

25.10.2015 5:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucophora / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

25.10.2015 5:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucophora / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

25.10.2015 5:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucophora / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

25.10.2015 5:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sympetrum sanguineum / Confidently identified / Marina Yolkina.

25.10.2015 2:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Dr. Image not found.

25.10.2015 0:02, Irina Nikulina:

A description of all kinds of Crambus 9 40 Reg. VA is in the monograph Kirpichnikova, images - the same place and on jpmoth

24.10.2015 22:52, Peter Khramov:

Formalized values ​​characteristic will have two. The rest infa - in a note (you can appropriate recommendations when loading or help add). But the question of how to more successfully to call these values ​​- is relevant. Will thought - necessarily write.

24.10.2015 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Evegny it different forms:
"Classic" Melolontha hippocastani Fabricius, 1801: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46424
And variations Melolontha hippocastani var. nigripes Comolli, 1837: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46425 (read the signature on the photo).
Note the difference in color of the pronotum and legs.
And the fact that one date, period ......
Since these forms just me flying to the light at the same time in equal numbers (sometimes zamuchivayus them from the balcony "overboard" to throw out) :)

24.10.2015 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.10.2015 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, this I mean that the photo in nature, except for color insect must pass more and way of life of this insect by the plot.
Otherwise, should be taking notes.
It is desired.
And "no court no ', as they say;)

24.10.2015 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, well, here it is impossible to come up with 100% foolproof. Well dung will be put on a flower, so what is that ecology, bionics and Etalogiyu studying the photos - no. So what does the background photos? None whatsoever. Do not create problems where none exist.

24.10.2015 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Under staged shots, I mean something that can not, for example, the dung beetle or purely podkornik or beetle living in the trees and feeds on tree sap to sit on flowered not given him this nature.
That's why it is necessary to indicate that the snapshot staging.A painting is a sign of too volatile to make it focus :)

24.10.2015 17:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, explained the purpose of the placement at the same time here these two photos: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46425 and http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46424? Is that the question of the meaning of existence in the taxonomy of these "varietetov." Cool illustration - one point one date.

24.10.2015 17:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Anatoly for photos here, "the drum" How to get a picture with a lively and natural color of the insect. It is important that it is a living without color change. What is the difference in the cage or in the meadow? Appearance is not changing, after drying, etc. We did not photosite where the fault with the staged shots.

24.10.2015 16:21, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Peter! The problem then will be, because that staging photo (made in captivity) in the comments indicate no (99%), and the nature of the discrepancy can be huge. For the selection of pictures to be formalized as the attribute. Personally, I, of course, it is, but in science, I think, is important.And as for the dead / collector I think so - I shoot sometimes these items, but do not collect and do not save. So, I think this feature should be formalized for clarity.

24.10.2015 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Pavel Kirillov Tridrepana microcrocea / Irina Nikulina.

24.10.2015 13:23, Peter Khramov:

Moments should take into account the comments and notes to the photos. A collector / live - a formal indication that A) is necessary for the selection of ph and B) should be clear to the largest possible number of users.

24.10.2015 10:56, Irina Nikulina:

Tridrepana microcrocea

24.10.2015 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is willy-nilly, the question of the jackdaw another "Staged photo" (for "live" insect).
It is no secret that many photographers before-how to make a picture of the pre-podmarivayut object because that live it off is not possible.And in what conditions are placed at the same insect which it is given position - depending on the photographer.
Therefore it is necessary to take into account this point.

24.10.2015 9:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Anatoly, to illustrate the taxon is not important, filmed live insect "in the wild or in captivity," and it is important that this insect has a natural color, often - a characteristic pose, etc. With all the love Basil to collector's item :) - many species are in the collections considerably unlike ourselves live.That's why you need to separate the living and the expanded-dried for a collection, or just take pictures.

24.10.2015 8:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Basil Sergienko.

24.10.2015 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Venusia laria / .

24.10.2015 8:43, Basil Sergienko:

Venusia laria

24.10.2015 8:04, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

I would claim 1 divided into two parts, "the wild" and "Captive". A paragraph 2 on the "dead" and "Collection". I think - this will solve the problem of identifying the subject.

24.10.2015 0:44, Peter Khramov:

Dry / crude - is not just a sign or a note, it is a sign by which to select the photos. Therefore, both values ​​should be to call. The meaning of this division:

1. Shooting in nature (whether or not in the nature of, and in the barn / apartment) live cockroach or a truptsa but truptsa "estesstvenno origin." Now it is on the website called Living / Alive.
2.Shooting caught for collection / research instance. Although the unfolding, though not. Now it is on the site called Collection / Pinned (previously dry).

And in Russian and in English I do not like these options because they do not clarify the essence of 100%. If you have any suggestions on how to improve - well. And yet - the lesser of two evils.

23.10.2015 21:30, Irina Nikulina:

Illustrated. A link to a photo themselves are optional, and so I have them immediately see.

23.10.2015 21:28, Irina Nikulina:

I saw only 2 photos Hemistola zimmermanni network, both Alexander Kuzmin, one for us and it is still on the same site, and the second here in this http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&view=findpost&p=1327890 Butterfly Photo Eugene is really very similar to Hemistola zimmermanni, but molbiole postscript "of the accuracy of the determination can not answer" second charged and loaded later, maybe, Alexander has found confirmation ..It is necessary to ask that at least one image Hemistola zimmermanni was significant. Ure, if you use other images, give a reference, please.

23.10.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, another race without photos languishing: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/973587 :)
Photos here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/976098

23.10.2015 18:37, Irina Nikulina:

Ectropis sp. Perhaps, Ectropis excellens, had less contrast and more pronounced pattern on the background of dark spots, but there's probably no experts who know these two species can not do. Twice I tried to understand (http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/29526 and http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/27640), but there is no clarity.

23.10.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.10.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's it.
And the inscription "Dry instance" ........
It is better to do without any labels, rather than with the :)

23.10.2015 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

We are moving away from the topic of discussion.

23.10.2015 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then, why there are no photo collection?
I just label in a collection is more important and discussed the inscription under the photo on the website, rather than the quality of raspravki.
In many serious collections of material and does not smoothing and this collection does not lose its value.

23.10.2015 17:29, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, illustration on the site

23.10.2015 17:28, Irina Nikulina:

I think, I had lived well Hypomecis roboraria

23.10.2015 17:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Hypomecis / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 17:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I keep a collection like no collection, I do not collect :))
I raspravki quality photos and much more eye cuts than the label underneath. :(

23.10.2015 17:22, Irina Nikulina:

Hypomecis punctinalis (however, never seen images Hypomecis pseudopunctinalis - one of 6 seaside Hypomecis)

23.10.2015 17:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, there has been a consensus seems to be: living (in nature, cage, babochkovom garden and other) point, and other options - do not write. Peter, how are you?

23.10.2015 17:05, Alexander Belousov:

A, if the copies. smoothing (dry) but without the labels (many do not recognize such copies. collector) how to write? Or even from a bag. But the picture is! What then?
I think the option "just a photo" just will. A collector, has to write in the comment to the photo.

23.10.2015 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina now shifted bronzovok and stumbled upon the fact that this kind: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/973497 without pictures.
The picture can be taken away: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/974338 (this is the only site).

23.10.2015 16:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, is that you in fact.
Because the collection is not holding, and does not hurt you.
Dmitry, Eugene and I still like cuts (((
How to imagine how much work and effort is behind this - of the collection ......
So cuts uniquely :)
And your proposal is also supported: it is better not to write anything at all in such cases.

23.10.2015 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.10.2015 16:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander, and your version is good enough! When shooting a living object - indicate, and the rest do not. It is logical and less poking buttons that :).

23.10.2015 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

I have no ears, no eyes does not hurt :) dry it is dry. Is it worth it in the collection, or sfotografiran on the windowsill or on the roadside. Seriously though, the name suggests suitable for all occasions.
You can certainly say that not everything in the photo zhivie deystviteno live there, what exactly is wet inside.If you have dry, that is, the wet - alive or not alive, but still wet. Alternatively, the dry specimens at all that does not write. Photo living insect (in nature) and a photo of all other states.

23.10.2015 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, like: has long been the most eye cuts.
The question has been raised: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42996
Keep.

23.10.2015 15:05, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Eugene. Fix. When there were changes in the structure of taxa, some of them appeared without illustrations. For example, in the case of intermediate taxon. Such unillustrated pages already caught more than 30, and is itself, and users write) To view everything - not enough time (.So if something else such notice, write!
Sasha, Chariaspilates also adjusted, but that's where it came from chehlonoska not present) is impossible to do by hand :)

23.10.2015 14:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Georgia started the pictures of the collection of material and immediately felt "dry" a copy of the eye / ear "cuts". I propose to substitute "collector's item", or "a copy of the collection." And what if there is dry, then reported to be still wet :)

23.10.2015 13:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, I dokapalis. :) Worth every mistake and puts Autocomplete 1042 instead of 1049. :(

23.10.2015 13:38, Irina Nikulina:

There illustration confused. On p. 55 in the description of all true worth: flavomacula- Table. Figure 2. 46-47, suaveola - Table. Figure 2. 42-43, and I'm still in the description "to the insects DDA" look (well, I have a strange name Victoria :)))

23.10.2015 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Victoria rEWWfwOGOPccLOZUp Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctuoidea / Evgeny Komarov Pangrapta flavomacula / Victoria rEWWfwOGOPccLOZUp.

23.10.2015 12:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Written without seeing the first to comment.

23.10.2015 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pangrapta flavomacula, if not one but at Kononenko in the "scoop Siberia" tab. Figure 2. 46-47 is Pangrapta suaveola.

23.10.2015 12:37, Irina Nikulina:

Pangrapta flavomacula

23.10.2015 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Endropiodes indictinaria / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 11:44, Irina Nikulina:

Endropiodes indictinaria

23.10.2015 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Selenia tetralunaria / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Horisme vitalbata / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Geometra dieckmanni / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 11:35, Irina Nikulina:

Horisme vitalbata

23.10.2015 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trichius / Fedor Ovechkin Trichius fasciatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.10.2015 11:21, Irina Nikulina:

Geometra dieckmanni http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Geometrinae/Geometra_dieckmanni.html

23.10.2015 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trichius / Fedor Ovechkin Trichius fasciatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.10.2015 11:14, Irina Nikulina:

Selenia tetralunaria

23.10.2015 11:01, Evgeny Komarov:

http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/979320 - the representatives of the subfamily have illustrated taxa, but no illustrations at the subfamily.

23.10.2015 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Phthonosema tendinosaria / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2015 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/913 Error, race Chariaspilates moths illustrated chehlonoskoy.

23.10.2015 10:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Phthonosema tendinosaria

23.10.2015 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Chariaspilates formosaria / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 10:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Phthonosema tendinosaria / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2015 10:51, Irina Nikulina:

Chariaspilates formosaria

23.10.2015 10:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.10.2015 10:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.10.2015 10:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, everything is normal, Alexander! I do not remember all the butterflies.

23.10.2015 10:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Phthonosema tendinosaria

23.10.2015 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.10.2015 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.10.2015 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.10.2015 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.10.2015 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.10.2015 10:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

I looked at her, I saw that there Moth, and Kononenko not recognize. Thank you, Yuri. :)

23.10.2015 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Oruza mira / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2015 10:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, like Oruza mira

23.10.2015 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Imago / Evgeny Komarov Cabera griseolimbata / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2015 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

In its range, it does not come to Primorye. There's three of its kind. not exactly Ourapteryx maculicaudaria (Motschulsky, 1866), but koreana or ussurica, probably second. :)

23.10.2015 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Biston / Irina Nikulina Biston robustum / Basil Sergienko.

23.10.2015 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Biston / Irina Nikulina Biston robustum / Basil Sergienko.

23.10.2015 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Biston / Irina Nikulina Biston robustum / Basil Sergienko.

23.10.2015 9:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Let him.

23.10.2015 9:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Cabera griseolimbata (Oberthur, 1879)

23.10.2015 9:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Eulithis convergenata / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Eulithis convergenata / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2015 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Idaea auricruda / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2015 9:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Arytrura subfalcata / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2015 9:30, Yuri Semejkin:

I speak for Hemistola zimmermanni

23.10.2015 9:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Eulithis convergenata (Bremer, 1864)

23.10.2015 9:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Eulithis convergenata (Bremer, 1864)

23.10.2015 9:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Idaea auricruda (Butler, 1879)

23.10.2015 9:06, Evgeny Komarov:

I do not argue :) Also let Irina glyanet.

23.10.2015 9:02, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion this Ourapteryx ussurica, 1993

23.10.2015 7:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Geometra sponsaria / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 7:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Thetidia chlorophyllaria / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 7:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Eucyclodes difficta / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 7:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Geometra papilionaria / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 7:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Geometra glaucaria / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 7:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2015 7:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Idiochlora ussuriaria / Alexander Belousov.

23.10.2015 7:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

23.10.2015 7:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vanessa indica / Tatiana Selena Vanessa cardui / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2015 3:48, Yuri Semejkin:

It Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758)

23.10.2015 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

Geometra sponsaria

22.10.2015 22:58, Irina Nikulina:

Thetidia chlorophyllaria

22.10.2015 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jankowskia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.10.2015 22:44, Irina Nikulina:

This lost) it is necessary also to send Jankowskia

22.10.2015 21:58, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps too Chlorissa anadema? http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Geometrinae/Chlorissa_anadema.html

22.10.2015 21:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, at least the genus was not wrong :)

22.10.2015 21:56, Irina Nikulina:

Edit has not had time, I wanted to add that, perhaps, inornata

22.10.2015 21:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, Irina, very close!

22.10.2015 21:44, Irina Nikulina:

And it's not Maxates grandificaria?

22.10.2015 21:16, Irina Nikulina:

Here, I think, Chlorissa sp. Most likely, Chlorissa anadema. I would like to, and it looked Vasily Sergienko

22.10.2015 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Now, I do not like it, I'll get to see Sergienko.

22.10.2015 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Geometra papilionaria / Irina Nikulina.

22.10.2015 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Geometra glaucaria / Irina Nikulina.

22.10.2015 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Eucyclodes difficta / Irina Nikulina.

22.10.2015 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geometridae / Evgeny Komarov Idiochlora ussuriaria / Irina Nikulina.

22.10.2015 20:46, Irina Nikulina:

Eucyclodes difficta

22.10.2015 20:42, Irina Nikulina:

Geometra papilionaria

22.10.2015 20:38, Irina Nikulina:

Geometra glaucaria

22.10.2015 20:35, Irina Nikulina:

Idiochlora ussuriaria, I think. (Photo # 27328 defines you. Sergienko)

22.10.2015 19:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Perhaps mistaken definition, but more than anything suitable.

22.10.2015 15:58, Irina Nikulina:

At the same time with Yurina decided to put this tie to really just deal with both. I'm going to put it like Acria nivalis, tk. Chinese authors of the article "Review of the genuis Acria ..." is also seen, and also the very nivalis considered confirmed, in Latin - the snow, but now is in uncertain load.

22.10.2015 15:04, Yuri Semejkin:

I will answer the letter.

22.10.2015 14:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, it's not that simple, I would say that this Acria nivalis Wang & Li, 2000. See article: www.zootax.com.cn/admin/downfile.aspx?id=18325
Acria ceramitis - dark butterfly.
I see in this family if this family, that something was wrong until I will understand.

22.10.2015 13:16, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, freak deleted. Regarding truck - of course, Georgia. Such foty better than no - that's for sure.
Irina, Basil, on other issues will look later.

22.10.2015 13:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Acria ceramitis Meyrick, 1908. Ponomarenko identified the MG BPI FEB RAS.

22.10.2015 12:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Good.

22.10.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, there is only one view of the race. We put the form in imprecise, since the definition of the author doubts :)

22.10.2015 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhabdocosma / Confidently identified Rhabdocosma aglaophanes / Tentatively identified.

22.10.2015 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Rhabdocosma / Yuri Semejkin.

22.10.2015 12:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Rhabdocosma? aglaophanes. Defined Ponomarenko MG BPI FEB RAS. The definition is not accurate. Without genitals and others. Methods are not definable.

22.10.2015 10:24, Irina Nikulina:

And here. In my opinion, Araschnia levana (ssp. wladimiri Kardakov, 1928)

22.10.2015 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

22.10.2015 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

22.10.2015 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Parasemia plantaginis Parasemia plantaginis sachalinensis.

22.10.2015 9:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Prochoreutis Prochoreutis alpina.

22.10.2015 9:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Prochoreutis alpina (Arita, 1976). Defined Ponomarenko MG BPI FEB RAS.

22.10.2015 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spoladea recurvalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.10.2015 23:21, Irina Nikulina:

Spoladea recurvalis

21.10.2015 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Simply it is necessary to ask me :) The entire group to unleash?

21.10.2015 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

21.10.2015 22:27, Tatiana Selena:

I do not know how to do in the editing can not delete other.

21.10.2015 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course goods, Eugene. It is quite normal photo.
As such, and to define a simpler and truer than on a photo in nature.
Always for the collection material :)

21.10.2015 21:06, Irina Nikulina:

Why not? These pictures are not of bad quality. It can be illustrated more than a dozen species. If there will be more of these kinds of high-quality photos or self Eugene accomplished the feat peresёmki, you can always replace the illustration.
Page does not refresh, Alexander had already written, it turns out, the view is the same)

21.10.2015 20:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Now that the majority of taxa above the generic and empty, the quality can not speak. If you do not define the notion of giving taxon normal. If the photo is determined, Georgia and do not reflect. Most importantly the correct definition of this photo is difficult to determine. It's my opinion. :)

21.10.2015 20:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Question to all! There is a huge array of pictures collection, made over 10 years ago for its own database. The size of no more than 600 pixels. for large and quality, alas - the first tsifromylnitsa. At the same time, most of these kinds of footage unlikely anyone will soon illustrate, and the retake of the new soon will not undertake.Does it make sense to spread the pictures here are (put a little): http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46219, http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46218, http://insecta.pro/ru/ gallery / 46204, http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/46203?

21.10.2015 20:38, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.10.2015 19:42, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, this is the case about which you asked to report. I'm in the LC information on this form http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/193845, as a non-illustrated, no. While not illustrated, I am waiting for you.But I think I understand what types it happens - those where I originally had tried to put a picture defined to the subspecies in the illustration to the form (like my marshmallows happened) ones I did not touch it, after your corrections It appeared in the LC.
And once again I recall the http: // insecta.pro / ru / gallery? size = sm & sp = 335350, there is no second photo to illustrate, but in view of the LC hangs, clean, please.

21.10.2015 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Understand, please: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/193845
It is time to have it in the form.

21.10.2015 16:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cicadetta.

21.10.2015 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Jura, suffered on the basis of: http://dmitriev.speciesfile.org/taxahelp.asp?hc=39354&key=Erythroneura&lng=En
where: Idiocerus (Koreocerus) koreanus Matsumura, 1915
Distribution
Russia (Primorskiy kray), Russia (S Khabarovsk kray), Korea.

21.10.2015 16:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cicadellidae Idiocerus koreanus.

21.10.2015 16:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cicadellidae.

21.10.2015 16:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Remove this monster here http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1032181, distracted :) Even the roof goes on, what is happening in the Carabidae and Lebiinae in particular. And it is only to the level of subtribes rake.

21.10.2015 16:10, Evgeny Komarov:

Those "synonyms" that I removed, only existed on this site - there is no such combinations in nature and taxonomy. How they managed to condense a deep mystery.

21.10.2015 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, and you're doing everything right, removing synonyms? Here the concept of a synonym in a very broad sense, it is a combination of generic and different spelling and grammar based on the name under which the kind mentioned in the literature. You sechas removed as invalid synonyms generic combinations are combined. Synonyms birth there.Now a binary name with the wrong native beetles will not find. :(

21.10.2015 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, such a request. If you can arrange automatic taxa commas between author and year of description - Arrange, please (like has been corrected in the authors describe the caps).
Manually drive commas where they do not exist - a thankless task. And they are not very many places (((

21.10.2015 11:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chorthippus maritimus.

21.10.2015 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma.

21.10.2015 11:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pentatoma.

21.10.2015 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lopinga achine / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

21.10.2015 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tatiana, this butterfly is different, and they are in a group of one individual. We must put them separately.

21.10.2015 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.10.2015 10:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

21.10.2015 10:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Parasemia plantaginis Parasemia plantaginis sachalinensis.

21.10.2015 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Parasemia plantaginis Parasemia plantaginis sachalinensis.

21.10.2015 10:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Lopinga achine (Scopoli, 1763)

21.10.2015 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

I answer. :) Superfluous synonyms if they farmalizovany affixed machine, udalyayutsyaya approach by Adding a form , and presentation of the ticks in unnecessary synonyms, and then pressing the Remove selected synonyms
If synonyms are entered manually, they can only udalt Peter.I once thought that Eugene, the same powers as that of the rest of the moderators. Of course expand your circle. In Eugene. :)
Who is going to add all sorts of different kinds of?

21.10.2015 10:42, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha did not understand - you're in Levan it and I have set up, to be honest, yesterday did not know much about (I looked at Sinev that Sakhalin only Bureya - and written. And it is necessary to understand. Because Korshunova, such as Sakhalin are a few subspecies and forms levan, including the intermediates.But Bureya on Sakhalin Island is not like the mainland, where the Japanese subspecies strigosa. Also you need to watch. We have O.Berlova yuzhnosahalinskie burejana.

21.10.2015 10:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Mylabris / Evgeny Komarov.

21.10.2015 10:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, in the genus Bembidion, subgenus Diplocampa (taxon 956,839) found full neponyatku - types were assigned to the genus Trepanes (in fact it is also a subgenus), to which no one ever treated. Pens corrected, the head of almost all kinds of re, after which they are registered as expected, but the former merged with the new institution. But now they all synonyms registered non-existent!

21.10.2015 9:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

Chrysomela

21.10.2015 9:53, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, Eugene Perens is not because he has no rights. There is only you, Vasily and Dmitry Pozhogin. Well, I do too.
Expanding the circle?

21.10.2015 9:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Or Araschnia levana, for Sakhalin is not specified, or something I do not understand these two kinds.

21.10.2015 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2015 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Moved.

21.10.2015 9:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cymindis lineata Cymindis decora.

21.10.2015 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cymindis lineata Cymindis decora.

21.10.2015 9:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's okay, no definition "?", "May", "my opinion", the moderators can be transferred automatically, and so there are errors Most asked if the definition is not 100%, to indicate this. Moderators also do not know much. :)

21.10.2015 9:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Then my jamb inadvertently - this photo # 45021 actually Cymindis decora Fischer von Waldheim, 1829. Transfer urgently needs!

21.10.2015 7:48, Fedor Ovechkin:

And with that that, too, before the race?

21.10.2015 7:42, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I expressed my mnenie.V any case, the recent decision of the vami.Deystvuyte.

21.10.2015 0:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cnemidanomia.

21.10.2015 0:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Confucius / Yuri Semejkin.

20.10.2015 23:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elasmostethus.

20.10.2015 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Graphosoma.

20.10.2015 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Graphosoma / Yuri Semejkin.

20.10.2015 23:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tropidothorax.

20.10.2015 23:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yura, I now try out the admin that can take up with generic names.

20.10.2015 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mermitelocerus.

20.10.2015 23:45, Evgeny Komarov:

A fisherman did not like :) Thanks, Irene.

20.10.2015 23:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Pyrrhocoris / Yuri Semejkin.

20.10.2015 23:28, Irina Nikulina:

Impressive!) And just walking on a variety of sites, not just see, but did not know that it's your photo, Eugene (only correct to mm 1.5 meters still pulls :)))

20.10.2015 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

9 Chrysoteuchia coastal species are described in the monograph VA Kirpichnikova "Ognёvki fauna of the Far East of Russia" There is also a picture Chrysoteuchia mandschurica. It is the only species whose median strip is formed by a wide gray-brown stripe. Here the image of the Red Book of Korea http://www.korearedlist.go.kr/redlist/home/redlist/redlist_view.jsp?link_gbn=ex_search&rlcls_sno=1305&1=1&page_count=27

20.10.2015 23:16, Irina Nikulina:

All 12 species of coastal Acrobasis well differ in appearance.

20.10.2015 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ruspolia.

20.10.2015 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is necessary to add the form.

20.10.2015 22:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Assimilate. Synonyms for birth register is necessary, even if not immediately. Only the combination of species are not sufficient to raise issues that are solved and synonymy birth. Look Carabidae.org - there is clear: to drive in a strange kind of search, you brings to valid, and that he was looking for, spelled out in his sinonimah.

20.10.2015 21:53, Peter Khramov:

The ability to write synonyms for childbirth, etc. Now really not, but I can not say that I believe that it is not necessary to write. Just so far this has not been done. In general, most did not. Even for the catalog. Actually, they already have in part, these synonyms in the database, just not displayed. Bum do.

20.10.2015 21:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

All four bleszynskiellus, gratiosella, jaxartellus and ramburiellus looks virtually identical, or very slightly, and here the availability of information about one of them?

20.10.2015 20:46, Nikolay Grebennikov:

on the internet a lot of information on this species

20.10.2015 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeah, kind of figured. In addition to prescribed synonyms for old A hands? Peter believes that synonyms do not have to leave to write, then even this is not possible. And everything else you wrote. Synonyms merge codes to endure. kind of empty clean. Specific synonyms themselves are written in the transference and unification. :)

20.10.2015 20:40, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, we discussed this issue over the phone, I will make an additional form, that it can be mold on semiautomatic. While not endure anything in situations tens birth to one.

20.10.2015 20:24, Evgeny Komarov:

The situation is particular: there is a valid genus and a dozen aliases to this genus; All is on the site; synonymous at birth there are species of which have duplicates site contains valid way, some - only in labor-synonyms. That's kind of a crap trying to clean up without downloading Peter. All the more confusing than you suggested. Ieis a kind of A (valid) is genera B, C, D, ..., which are summarized in the synonyms of the genus A. Each of these genera have online collection of species (from zero to ten) of which is already in the kind of A ( doubles), part - only in childbirth B, C, D ..., quite valid.With valid absent in the genus And it is clear - migrate, but as with versions? Combine? How then emptied with birth-synonyms B, C, D ... prescribed synonyms for old A hands? Like explained?

20.10.2015 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nikolai, how do you distinguish between these types of photos: bleszynskiellus, gratiosella, jaxartellus and ramburiellus, which is in the region of 11? Generally there 9 species of this genus, but I'm interested in the 4, I can only cooking. :)

20.10.2015 19:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nemapogon granella / Alexander Belousov Nemapogon / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.10.2015 19:42, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Euchromius ramburiellus.

20.10.2015 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene again Details Ask a question. I do not understand. If the race has changed?
Peter, if there was a kind of A, and now the name has changed for all species B as a stand to change the name of the genus, and that the old left as a generic combination of a synonym? So, Eugene?

20.10.2015 19:31, Alexander Belousov:

Now, too, kind of like hanging separately. Let a native would. Maybe when and face it. Just more than they have never met.

20.10.2015 19:03, Evgeny Komarov:

With generic taxa such is not possible, as I understand: just move / combine species of the genus-synonym to the right, delete "empty" and prescribe it as a synonym?

20.10.2015 18:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Excellent! Thank you for understanding!

20.10.2015 15:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, I found on mobiole, I determined, but I wrote: Somewhere near Nemapogon granella . It is not even inaccurate, it's just kind of. :(

20.10.2015 14:51, Peter Khramov:

Note: this is not necessary to know the number of type B. In a field where a skid that number now work autosubstitution. Accordingly, you can simply start typing the name and to select a taxon. Confusion can arise only when we combine the two kinds of the same name, then it is better to check the numbers, yes.

20.10.2015 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

View of the site is in a different way.

20.10.2015 14:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, is transferred to the genus, where the species was described, that would not have hung in the admin.

20.10.2015 14:13, Alexander Belousov:

Determined to Molbiole long. I not recorded who defined. You can put until inaccurate.

20.10.2015 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, thank you for confirmation.

20.10.2015 13:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

20.10.2015 13:34, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, you can move into precise. To deal with filmed Hypsopygia, I reviewed all. Synonymous with this kind Hypsopygia aurotaenialis (Christoph, 1881). It was under this name is given in the form of a monograph V.A.Kirpichnikovoy. It differs from the other four, 37 and living in the nearby 40 reg, that this broad cross-yellow stripe, tapering to the rear edge. Here is one of the DV-subspecies http://clasate.cimec.ro/detaliu.asp?tit=Hypsopygia-aurotaenialis--Hypsopygia-aurotaenialis-var-intunecalis-Caradja-1926&k=5D2C840D30CA43389A63A8CBA0B0A70D.

20.10.2015 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, as well as a determined? In many similar species of the genus.

20.10.2015 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Victoria rEWWfwOGOPccLOZUp Irina Nikulina.

20.10.2015 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Victoria rEWWfwOGOPccLOZUp Irina Nikulina.

20.10.2015 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia burejana / Confidently identified / Victoria rEWWfwOGOPccLOZUp.

20.10.2015 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia burejana / Confidently identified / Victoria rEWWfwOGOPccLOZUp.

20.10.2015 13:04, Irina Nikulina:

Araschnia burejana

20.10.2015 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, combine the two species taxon is very simple. A correct view, the view in the wrong.
1. Look in the number of species in vebadresse: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/ 21096 .
2. Copy it
3. Go to the page type A.
4. Under the species name on the right there is an active label The addition of information on the form , go into it.
5.In the window on the second line, paste the copied number.
6. Click the Merge
All the information on the type of passes in addition to the form A. The very name synonymous with prescribed to A.

20.10.2015 9:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina Xylocopa flavonigrescens / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

20.10.2015 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Xylocopa latipes / Fedor Ovechkin.

20.10.2015 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Xylocopa latipes / Fedor Ovechkin.

20.10.2015 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hymenoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Xylocopa latipes / Fedor Ovechkin.

20.10.2015 9:13, Fedor Ovechkin:

Xylocopa flavonigrescens, is inaccurate.

20.10.2015 9:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

Xylocopa latipes

20.10.2015 8:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eurema / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.10.2015 8:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eurema / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.10.2015 7:36, Fedor Ovechkin:

We ought to move, as well №30624.

20.10.2015 7:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil Alexander, Peter! I do not quite understand about the unification of taxa (Vasily doing these things on a regular basis, I'm still afraid nakosyachit)? If your site has two types, one of which is synonymous with the other (it is of a different kind, etc.), What happens in the combination? What algorithm here? And if a dozen existing generic taxa are summarized in the synonyms for one? And the views are partially duplicated. It handles only Peter? Or? This amount was terrible in Carabidae. If each such case unsubscribe Peter, he is not physically have time to all the rules.

19.10.2015 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jankowskia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2015 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.10.2015 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jankowskia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2015 20:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jankowskia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2015 20:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Peter Khramov Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2015 20:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jankowskia / Confidently identified / Peter Khramov.

19.10.2015 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Biston / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2015 20:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Biston / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2015 20:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Biston / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2015 20:15, Irina Nikulina:

I think that this and the next photo Biston thoracicaria, very characteristic shape and color of the bond
http://insect.naas.go.kr/search/class_spe_view.asp?ord_id=R1&family_id=CI&gen_nm=Biston&species_id=ZR1CI0337&search_gb=02&left_gb=A
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=158382

19.10.2015 20:14, Irina Nikulina:

Biston robustum? Discussion relied on here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/28938

19.10.2015 18:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.10.2015 18:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.10.2015 18:37, Irina Nikulina:

Images of two types Jankowskia network bit, pseudathleta - http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Jankowskia_pseudathleta.html
athleta http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=177612 and http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=212056&view=findpost&p=1331474
To deal with the differences under Chinese authors NAN JIANG, DAYONG XUE & HONGXIANG HAN «A review of Jankowskia Oberthür, 1884, with descriptions of four new species (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Ennominae)» It describes the 9 species and clues to determine.Differences between these two types: athleta - postmedialnaya sling has a strong bending outward between M1 and M2, the basal area of ​​a light grayish-brown (pale greyish brown) pseudathleta - bending postmedialnoy sling between M1i M2 less basal area ZK dull black-brown color (dull blackish brown).In the key color of basal zone ZK given as the main, probably the most reliable indication of operating differences. The article has a picture athlete.
The picture standing in inaccurate http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/28934, I would now, given everything written, carried to the athlete . From my set today 5 I would Jankowskia # 46061-63 (Tiger) carried to the athleta , and # 46064-65 (of Anisimovka) - to the pseudathleta .But there is no certainty, Jankowskia met for the first time, I would like to hear the opinion of experts.

19.10.2015 18:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.10.2015 18:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.10.2015 17:48, Vladimir Bryukhov:

In this image and related - male. https://www.insekten-sachsen.de/Pages/TaxonomyBrowser.aspx?Id=231725

19.10.2015 15:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rather, it is a widespread Prochoreutis myllerana, but still there are several kinds of Primorye, the image of which I could not find. Leaving the definition to the race. :)

19.10.2015 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Choreutidae Prochoreutis.

19.10.2015 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Peter is now prvilno, but you did, and what is the algorithm for the curators is probably not an isolated case. It is necessary to add synonyms Pterostoma sinicum, under this name this kind priodilsya from Russia. I'll add and explain :)

19.10.2015 12:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

19.10.2015 12:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysocrambus craterella / Svetlana Karaeva Chrysocrambus linetella / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.10.2015 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, look, if it is all right, the commentary to the form that exists in Russia, describe the situation, to make it clear how and where the information came from.

19.10.2015 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

19.10.2015 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysocrambus craterella / Igor Sakhno Chrysocrambus linetella / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.10.2015 12:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysocrambus craterella / Svetlana Karaeva Chrysocrambus linetella / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.10.2015 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Repeat from 16.10. I need an answer, so you do not have to fix it.
Peter is not a standard question, there are two kinds of good, one is in Russia, the other has not yet been found. But the information on the type of what is, on the page of the form, which is not in Russia. Some confused and incorrectly identified species. and literature was considered wrong.In my opinion it is necessary to combine these two types of species on the page which is in Russia, that it would have to represent the information in Russia. And then re-create the form, which in Russia. and accordingly, there will be no information on Russia.
Or is there some other algorithm?
I'm talking about http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/67540 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/22160

19.10.2015 10:12, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Once again convinced: "East - a delicate matter ...")

19.10.2015 0:47, Irina Nikulina:

Understood. Peter, in fact, we have already discussed, but perhaps not quite imagine what pearls can be found in the "majority", already present, so puzzled) I would try sometimes glances, blunders with the distortion of the meaning and absolutely absurd substitutions terms try catch.How then - to inform you, or perhaps find a way to correct it is possible, avoiding conversation with you? Worse definitely not do) Maybe even manage to kindy and any views replaced by species) Well, like pearls. And something all forms of the verb to be Google does not respect ..

19.10.2015 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Irina, now the majority of comments translated into (semi) automatic machine Google. Some of them combed (or transferred immediately hands), the majority - do not.The issue is solved or 1) universal literacy (here and in Russian it is not what is really there English), or 2) nemeryannom entuziazizmom (for the time being in this area there is no such resource), or 3) nemerenno infusion attendants (currently lacking).
In the best of times, when we have to transfer everything was much better in solving attended paragraphs. 2 and 3.In the foreseeable future - assuming that only para. 2 and, for the most part in my performance. If pleasant surprises happen, kanesh.

18.10.2015 22:48, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, here again, a request for the 2nd photo, which is not http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery?size=sm&sp=335350.
Pro functionality -nothing in the head is not. Editorial and technical support admin / site)
Head ache is now more about the English version. Sinceoften throws at it, I decided to go through the commentaries and permanently hangs (Got a long descent own comments on perlamutrovkam ET. Typically translation Google release a masterpiece "head" (Semantic inaccuracies + weight of lexical and grammatical errors.«View ino also represented in Primorye two podvidami» instead of «Species ino is also represented by two subspecies in Primorye» (even steeper «doerriesi - kind» to designate the kind Limenitis doerriesi) or «especially strong geography volatility looks Brenthis ino» instead of «Brenthis ino has especially high geographical variablility »Top wings -« the upper hand », etc. etc.Now anyone prichёsyvaet transfer after Google? Peter, I understand that just criticism not constructive, but have no idea how I can help ... Eye and not enough time to view everything from illustrations to keep pace, and do not consider myself a great expert angl.yaz, though all errors see well. I am afraid that often there is a distortion of the meaning.Let's think about how to be .. Oh, Leo is missing (

18.10.2015 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter Alexander support the question of subspecies. Make sure that opportunity.
In org. issue.
Irina you, selecting a photo to be placed on the page taxon Occupation design of these pages.
Therefore it is necessary to call and "page layout" or something like a

18.10.2015 22:07, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, I realized I will do. Now one can not civilized, but I'm inside.

18.10.2015 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, who can add, remove, merge, lowering and increase rank among subspecies?

18.10.2015 20:48, Peter Khramov:

Administrative group includes all at once, and the administrator have really nothing happened that technical ... why not ... znams

18.10.2015 19:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, you yourself called - administrative group. Curators oversee the group Moteratory moderate all photos. Administrators administer the entire site, create the image. :)

18.10.2015 18:50, Irina Nikulina:

http://www.nature.go.kr/newkfsweb/cm/common/zoomImageViewerPopup.do?imgList=/fileUpload/photo/R1/ZREL0144_1.jpg (Korea Forest Service) and http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Korea0606/63_Crambidae/Tylostega%20tylostegalis_060624403.jpg
Image also has a monograph VA Kirpichnikova "Ognёvki fauna of the Russian Far East", where the form is given as Entephria tylostegalis.

18.10.2015 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, thanks for the clarification. View is created and transferred to this photo :)

18.10.2015 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified Dorytomus kerzhneri / Tentatively identified.

18.10.2015 16:16, Peter Khramov:

And how it was sound originally?

18.10.2015 16:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, pr. - And it stands for "some seem hesitant." With such a label is applied to inaccurate.

18.10.2015 15:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily I do not know. We have no such reduction. This entry is made in the Zoological Institute. http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/dorkerse.htm

18.10.2015 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How to decipher the abbreviation pr. ?
Guess it Dorytomus sp., supposed kerzhneri Egorov & Korotyaev, 1974 (ie, put in inaccurate)?
The point is that we should not pretend and to send photos, but do not risk due to these cuts in the writing of the name.

18.10.2015 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Org.question:
How to call people (or they perform functional), which, for example, illustrate the types (as Irina), or engaged in the selection and processing of images for the site (like this in the near future will begin to make Yevgeny Komarov and Shamil Murtazin)?The issue is because the administrative, say, a group of us is growing, and will remodel profile writers to new people was immediately clear who is who and who is behind that website is responsible (or what influences).
Ie we have moderators, supervisors have and how to call this functionality?

18.10.2015 14:27, Peter Khramov:

Irina, corrected, now everything is shown.
Eugene deleted.
Basil, illustrations, and will leave, that's fine. But we'll see Irina, they have for the species, and will be able to put them in place. And earlier, and we can see it was not, and link these to the species foty we could not.

18.10.2015 14:13, Irina Nikulina:

Now LC has 11 species, and also all open without photo

18.10.2015 11:07, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, yes, there was 23116. But today, other glitches. Luke hung 9 species, and at the opening 4 are no photo at all (. For example, Curculio venosus. I pass to the right to "just a photo Curculio venosus" - then the picture on the right appear, but throws in England. Version. And so all 4. I left them in the LC, did not illustrate, look at what is wrong with them.

18.10.2015 10:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, alas, again - daring http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1032060

18.10.2015 8:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter tried to move, but illustrations to mind when it went: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/176461

18.10.2015 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Copris hispanus Copris hispanus cavolinii.

18.10.2015 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Copris hispanus Copris hispanus cavolinii.

18.10.2015 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Copris hispanus Copris hispanus cavolinii.

18.10.2015 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Copris hispanus Copris hispanus cavolinii.

18.10.2015 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Copris hispanus Copris hispanus cavolinii.

18.10.2015 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Copris hispanus Copris hispanus cavolinii.

18.10.2015 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.10.2015 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Comibaena amoenaria Comibaena tenuisaria.

18.10.2015 8:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Comibaena amoenaria / Tatyana Gordeeva Comibaena tenuisaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2015 1:51, Peter Khramov:

Irina, I removed the illustration of 23116, and he immediately appeared in the LC. See if you have? If so, and other things should be well. Therefore, if you suddenly find some options with a subspecies, which you do not have to LC - do not illustrate them, but first tell me that it was possible to check what was going on.

18.10.2015 1:39, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, thank you for a great job done. Luke found 6 species have scattered, but is not sure that there were all. I check those that remember - on your marshmallow http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/23116, illustrated, but it was not LC.
The "popular" all is quiet)

18.10.2015 1:16, Peter Khramov:

Basil is now foty subspecies can be attached to the species. Can you endure.
Irina, check whether all the rules work. Now you have to take into account the LC species list and foty subspecies.
ZY For all: now the link "all kinds of photos," displays not only foty tied to the form, but also to its subspecies.

18.10.2015 1:15, Peter Khramov:

It's fixed.

18.10.2015 0:22, Peter Khramov:

Irina, error found and corrected. Note that if you suddenly again something will - reported. But it should not.

18.10.2015 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, the situation with glitches in the tree by subsidiaries of the parent taxa when transferring to another to undergo treatment. Who else I will correct tree for the already transferred.

17.10.2015 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, do not know whether I told you the last time reference sent, but just in case I remind you that in the "popular" is still spinning errors, 5 today, accidentally caught.

17.10.2015 21:35, Tatyana Gordeeva:

I agree, it's C. tenuisaria.

17.10.2015 21:32, Peter Khramov:

Ugums removed.

17.10.2015 21:27, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Peter. Of course, it would be good to understand. I did not substantiate their doubts, because Alexander http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/31423 here have already given their arguments. I can only add a few links: tenuisaria -
http://boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=408327, amoenaria -http: //izumoga.com/saninmoth/heriziroyotumeaoshaku.html and http://hattoritaka.web.fc2.com/ga/herijiroyotsumeaoshaku. html

17.10.2015 21:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter again jamb prowess - he not fucking careful! http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1032058

17.10.2015 20:35, Peter Khramov:

I sent a message to Tatyana, let's see what she says...

17.10.2015 20:06, Irina Nikulina:

Parses today with its Comibaenini and also noted that there Comibaena tenuisaria. And in my opinion, both the picture, standing now amoenaria, are tenuisaria

17.10.2015 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pseudocneorhinus obesus.

17.10.2015 19:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Ok!

17.10.2015 16:58, Peter Khramov:

Remove. This is because you forgot to change the level of a taxon with species (by default, as they are likely to add) on gender. Try again, and everything will be OK.

17.10.2015 16:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasily, maybe I'll be lucky next year. I plan to be in Primorye region from 1 to 15 of july 2016 again.

17.10.2015 16:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, again, somehow obtained bastards! Submitting race Pseudocneorhinus Roelofs, 1873 I receive here such things: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/980270. Take away!

17.10.2015 16:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Curculio arborator Phyllobius arborator.

17.10.2015 14:27, Ivan Tislenko:

It has to be moved to http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/244736

17.10.2015 14:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Ok, Peter. I'll keep it mind.

17.10.2015 14:12, Peter Khramov:

So it ... Add to ...

17.10.2015 14:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Все работает. На пробу убрал парочку лишних подсемейств, прошло пока ОК. Петр, вот я выше писал уже о таком глюке, после переноса ряда триб из подсемейства Harpalinae по месту, заметил что цепочка таксонов при открытии подтрибы и ниже отображается некорректно. Вот пример: если открываем трибу, то нормально вот так: отряд Coleoptera → подотряд Adephaga → надсемейство Caraboidea → семейство Carabidae → подсемейство Pterostichinae → триба Pterostichini Bonelli 1810, а вот если откроем подтрибу или род, то получаем вот что: отряд Coleoptera → подотряд Adephaga → надсемейство Caraboidea → семейство Carabidae → подсемейство Harpalinae → триба Pterostichini → подтриба Pterostichina. Т.е где-то "фантомная боль" от удаленного осталась! Разберись!

17.10.2015 13:41, Peter Khramov:

Careful! Gg.

17.10.2015 13:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Pseudocneorhinus obesus Roelofs, 1873

17.10.2015 13:29, Evgeny Komarov:

It is necessary to take a closer look, which got the photo! The site is in the unfinished structuring supraspecific and other taxa, authors photos need to be careful!

17.10.2015 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Curculio arborator Phyllobius arborator.

17.10.2015 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We kindly request to all owners.
Be sure to specify a defined (if it is determined not independent) in the comment to the photo.
So it will be correct in relation to determine. And besides, there will always be someone to refer to in case of emerging issues.
Ilya (aka. Mantispid) trust completely and bear :)

17.10.2015 13:05, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, if possible, write in such cases (when the taxon is not in the database) with the name of the author of the year, OK?

17.10.2015 13:04, Peter Khramov:

Addition: curators can delete empty supraspecific taxa. Blank - so they do not have subsidiaries. Please check whether all the rules work.

17.10.2015 12:56, Ivan Tislenko:

Determined to molbiole Zabaluev Ilya Andreyevich as Phyllobius (s. Str.) Arborator (Herbst, 1797) http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&view=findpost&p=1555025
How did this kind of incomprehensible (like Georgia where necessary).
The foregoing also applies to the second photo of this species.

17.10.2015 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anoplophora glabripennis.

17.10.2015 10:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Dorytomus sp. pr. kerzhneri Egorov & Korotyaev, 1974

17.10.2015 10:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Accidentally I looked into Curculionidae! With the system, the distribution of species in genera there is a nightmare to order more than in Carabidae. It seems that in the same genus Curculio "dumped" all that is ever described as Curculio, and that most of the old descriptions. Shaw robyty we? :)

17.10.2015 10:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Pseudocneorhinus obesus

17.10.2015 9:57, Evgeny Komarov:

This kind of irrelevant to the genus Curculio not. This species of the genus of the tribe Phyllobius Phyllobiini Schönherr, 1826. In the photo to the form does not venture to determine, but hardly Phyllobius (s. Str.) Arborator (Herbst, 1797). Typical here http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/phyarbms.htm.

17.10.2015 9:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Anoplophora glabriipennis ( Motsch., 1853)

17.10.2015 1:05, Peter Khramov:

Basil, yes, it is better to do it to me, if there are many taxa. Eugene, with the change of the level of taxa situation is corrected.

17.10.2015 0:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! I have a similar problem with the Carabidae. Peter wrote above that rank down brakes - not reduced, there are plenty of subfamilies, which should not be in the family and they are most often also duplicated tribes. And so from top to bottom, ie, have extra non-existent tribes that duplicate existing subtribe, childbirth unnecessary, duplicated subgenera ...I try to take the swoop, but no - there is a very long time it will be necessary to rake and only with the help of Peter. And about synonymy supraspecific I generally keep quiet ... And doubles is generally ATAS!

16.10.2015 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter took a lead in the divine family of Scarabaeidae and the contents should be family Cetoniidae: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/973473 whole thing sent to the subfamily Cetoniinae: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/831533, and the family Cetoniidae completely removed from sight.
Since there is such a family Cetoniidae , but there is a subfamily Cetoniinae
Tucson Cetoniidae in the level of the family should not be here.
Alone you can not even do it.Or maybe tuplyu? Already head spin ((

16.10.2015 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Adalia bipunctata / Anatoliy Kuzmin Exochomus quadripustulatus / Ivan Tislenko.

16.10.2015 22:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes! Exochomus quadripustulatus (L., 1758) = Brumus quadripustulatus.

16.10.2015 22:13, Ivan Tislenko:

More like a Brumus quadripustulatus http://macroid.ru/showgallery.php?cat=5193&mode=box

16.10.2015 17:24, Evgeny Komarov:

A brief summary of the surface reconstruction of ground beetles. Do not change the rank of works - often have to sort of turned into a subgenus, but despite the message "amended" Rank does not change. It is impossible to add a description of the author and year to taxa, which is not spelled out. And further.Shifts in the structure of suprageneric karabid made, but phantom pain were: "... family Carabidae → subfamily Pterostichinae → tribe Pterostichini Bonelli in 1810" - everything is OK, but if you open the subtribe, we find here that ".. . family Carabidae → subfamily Harpalinae → tribe Pterostichini → subtribe Pterostichina ".

16.10.2015 14:57, Evgeny Komarov:

There generally is interesting endured freely hanging born in a place in the tribe subtribe Ozaenini Ozaenina. The result was this: "... detachment Diptera → family Richardiidae → genus Ozaenina → genus Goniotropis" (http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/292204). Since in diptera I can not - must be removed.And the reason is that the genus be wound up twice - once with an error of writing "Goniotrop u s" and when I corrected the spelling, there was a double! And as he flies off ...

16.10.2015 13:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, despite the "stopitstsot time" issue a warning, even nakosyachil. Take away http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/291852 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/291847.

16.10.2015 12:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1032020 prowess resulting "bastard" please. No editing, he can not be.

16.10.2015 12:33, Peter Khramov:

Reserves removed.

16.10.2015 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter is not a standard question, there are two kinds of good, one is in Russia, the other has not yet been found. But the information on the type of what is, on the page of the form, which is not in Russia. Some confused and incorrectly identified species. and literature was considered wrong.In my opinion it is necessary to combine these two types of species on the page which is in Russia, that it would have to represent the information in Russia. And then re-create the form, which in Russia. and accordingly, there will be no information on Russia.
Or is there some other algorithm?
I'm talking about http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/67540 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/22160

16.10.2015 12:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, a concrete example: 5620
It was the name of the Melanthia mandschuricata , I corrected for pervonapisaniyu Melanthia mandshuricata , the name of Melanthia mandschuricata gone, had to be added manually. :)
Shtudiruet Code, but none where I can not find, in any cases, supra taxa used parentheses to the author, may be square, but round, only taxa species rank.

16.10.2015 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ctenognophos grandinaria / Yuri Semejkin Anticypella diffusaria / Irina Nikulina.

16.10.2015 11:35, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, synonyms in all the species remains. With regard to the brackets - now on the site Sea supraspecific taxa with parentheses. Is it true - one must be specified. Eugene, on the editing - Today will check. Basil, a subspecies remember, try to fix quickly.

16.10.2015 11:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Excuse me - he nakosyachil. The tribe was something in the subfamily! I sensed that something very wrong ... You'll have to erase me to start.

16.10.2015 11:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Same story here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/979319. The transfer works, but the change in the level of the taxon and editing (adding the author and the year) no.

16.10.2015 11:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Everything was great until the drive in order subfamily Harpalinae. All work clearly and precisely. However, when engaged in the transfer and editing here this taxon, http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/979313, he bluntly refused to change. The history of my changes in the comments under the taxon clearly visible.

16.10.2015 8:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Aphrophora costalis Mats.

16.10.2015 8:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, I have a big question to item 3.2, and you, as far as I understand in the taxonomy (might have something forgot or did not know :)), but the authors of taxa above species are always written without parentheses. I certainly see the code, and to report the results, but it is doubtful that would have been. Maybe someone knows about this issue? write. :)
Everything is working. subspecies can not be added.When correcting spelling species taxa original description should remain synonymous.

16.10.2015 7:42, Evgeny Komarov:

This double photo # 44080. Remove to. Somewhere formed :)

16.10.2015 7:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Rhagionidae Chrysopilus.

16.10.2015 7:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Therevidae Chrysopilus.

16.10.2015 7:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha hero / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.10.2015 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I tried the same as running.
Tighter pristuplyu weekend (no time is now commonplace).
Not to delay the subspecies is important)))

16.10.2015 6:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Chrysopilus sp. (Rhagionidae). Determined Makarkin VN BPI FEB RAS.

16.10.2015 6:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Chrysopilus sp. Determined Makarkin VN BPI FEB RAS.

16.10.2015 1:31, Peter Khramov:

1. I'm a little glyukanul. The complex in the decision - is to illustrate supraspecific fotami taxa that are not tied to the species, but to supra. With subspecies poreshat easier to do so rather quickly.
2.Basil, remote I post is not exactly add any information to your previous one, which you wrote, it is believed that the issue should be resolved as quickly as possible.
2.1. If you perenesesh Fautua to the subspecies, the illustration of the species will not. So what. Wrap is still needed. The main thing is that there infa accessories foty to the subspecies and subspecies - the form.So everything else is solved. And what kind of hung for a while without a photo - bad, but not fatally.
2.2. Do not endure. It never competent behavior (see. Paragraph 2.1.), But the sub-species - it's so unimportant crap that I'm absolutely not insist.

Now, in the case of:
3. To finalize interfaces for curators. Sincebreak was pretty big, please READ THESE. Curators - not breaking anything. Nekuratorov - to understand how to work the curators.
3.1.The list of active curators at the moment (who has the technical ability to change the tree):
Alexander Zhakov (Lepidoptera), Vasiliy Feoktistov (Coleoptera), Evgeny Komarov (Coleoptera), Svyatoslav Knyazev (Hepialidae, Tortricoidea, Noctuoidea, Pyraloidea), Stas Korb (Rhopalocera).

3.2. Editing information about the supra taxa:

Four fields in the first row: The name of the taxon, author, year, author and year.Move the mouse to the field - will tooltip that is. The last field (author and year) is necessary in order to be able to drive to the bracket (or correct them). Example of how to edit the data, if we want to look like a taxon Papilio (Hubner, 2008):
Field 1 - Papilio. Field 2 - Hubner. Field 3 - Field 4, 2008. - (Hubner, 2008).

The next line - the change of the parent taxon.Conventional autosubstitution. If we want to send to the genus Papilio Satyrinae, then driven into this field and select Satyrinae substitution.

Another line - change the level of the taxon. It is still easier to select the desired option and click the button.

Stopitstsot times: we dance taxon from the spirit and not by its name or position in the system. We do not want to remove the old and add a new taxon.We want to edit the old so that he became the new (of course, if they are synonymous with a new mold can be based on the old). Therefore, always carefully review the possible synonyms on the site, and then edit / add Old.

3.3. Editing information about the kinds:

Actually, everything is similar.Except additives:
- Combining the two species. It is not just the removal of one of them is the reduction of total (ph, the comments, the text of information, synonyms, and so on. D.) From one species to another. Note: in this field we write from any kind infu forward to the current, and not vice versa.
- Removing unnecessary synonyms. Select jackdaws, click the button.

ZYAll the changes are not just curators written somewhere in the deepest depths, they are automatically issued in the form of comments, and immediately published on the pages of the relevant taxa, so you can always do (self) control.

Check, tell me whether all the rules.

16.10.2015 0:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, write well, it is possible, of course.
Just why do one work twice? If it's something to do now and then rewrite.
Simply move immediately to the subspecies. so much so that the head and then does not hurt.
Questions something serious.
Bring your picture I'm all here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/176461 to the subspecies (it is known to me and is listed on the site).View this point will do without illustrations.
That is why it is necessary to address these issues without delay and not to delay for months (as is the case with a rather unpleasant results).

16.10.2015 0:39, Irina Nikulina:

In any case, in order to avoid questions to Peter, to report it, I put this picture without subspecies in the illustration to the form. Did not do it deliberately, first I looked in and saw the LC unillustrated view Oryctes nasicornis, to which outputs only one photo for illustration, and then I saw your correspondence at photo # 44412.However, I do not really understand why it "can not be postponed." Why can not I write is the subspecies, for example, in the author's comments or the comments under the photo, and then, when the issue will be resolved, simply move to the subspecies. Peter also said that it is the task not too easy and takes time.(Photo illustration of the departed, I will return, when possible, to their former places)

16.10.2015 0:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I see the posts just deleted (among other things especially for the site photo did) (((
What will be interesting is if I pictures: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/44431 (the last one is not on the subspecies) transferred to O. n. punctipennis Motschulsky, 1860? Almost sure, but touching is not. Solve the case.
Pending a decision, I refuse to carry to the subspecies, even if they are known.

15.10.2015 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Recovering, and soon the still possible someone will carry to the subspecies.
You can not put it off my :)
By the way: from the nominative subspecies of rhinoceros lives in north-western Europe. Somewhere Well take it from there?

15.10.2015 22:43, Peter Khramov:

Here are all exactly the same: Now picture attached to the subspecies may not illustrate the look. We moved to the subspecies = removed from the kinds of illustrations. Soon corrected.

15.10.2015 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here the situation is somewhat different. These photos have illustrated the type and kind.
This is more serious than the photos put to the page type as originally supplied subspecies: it is simply the transfer took place after the establishment of the subspecies.

15.10.2015 22:30, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, I have already replied to you on this subject in the system area ...

15.10.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Postponed to the subspecies, which is common to the ECHR on the territory of the Volga and lost Illustrations from the page view.
We must deal with this glitch immediately.
Disorder serious when due to the establishment of the subspecies from the page kind of lost photos ((

15.10.2015 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes nasicornis Oryctes nasicornis polonicus.

15.10.2015 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes nasicornis Oryctes nasicornis polonicus.

15.10.2015 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes nasicornis Oryctes nasicornis polonicus.

15.10.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Oryctes nasicornis Oryctes nasicornis polonicus.

15.10.2015 20:25, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, removed.

15.10.2015 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.10.2015 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aspitates gilvaria / Confidently identified / Vitalij Dobronosov.

15.10.2015 10:18, Vladimir Bryukhov:

In fairness, we had to dig in the forum molbiola found: Determine photo Alexei Kovalev (Fornax13).
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&view=findpost&p=1555261

15.10.2015 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tatyanaerhynchites aequatus / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

15.10.2015 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tatyanaerhynchites aequatus / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

15.10.2015 9:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, that's just because of the features of such structures collapse of leaves (eg cigars, pipes) family of Russian and called attelabidae.
"The females lay their eggs in shallow pits or folds the sheet from which the larvae fold more or less tight package, often in the form of a tube or barrel." : https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Трубковёрты

15.10.2015 9:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Panaorus csikii

15.10.2015 9:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

15.10.2015 9:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aspidimorpha difformis.

15.10.2015 8:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus princeps.

15.10.2015 8:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Here it is, my dear! This year did not see any ... =)

15.10.2015 8:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, what kind of structure of leaves?

15.10.2015 7:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ectinohoplia rufipes.

15.10.2015 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apoderus rubidus.

15.10.2015 6:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Ectinohoplia rufipes Motsh.

15.10.2015 6:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Leptapoderus rubidus (Motschulsky, 1860)

14.10.2015 23:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Wow a green-eyed pussy :)

14.10.2015 22:37, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, clean more, please back to LK hanging form, where only one picture, already delivered to the page http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery?size=sm&sp=894748

14.10.2015 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I know, Eugene. He is the only one :)
Georgia is not just out of sight. Later in the LC she suffered at home.

14.10.2015 20:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Agripnus murinus (Linnaeus, 1758).

14.10.2015 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I remember that. First, you need to finish the gizmo editing taxa else, then everything else. There gimor much rather be with these alterations to illustrate ph.

14.10.2015 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, reminiscent of the unresolved question is still:
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/193845
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/976836
These types of non-illustrated because the photos delivered directly to the subspecies.
Understand, please.
After a month passed, and the case is still at the dead center.

14.10.2015 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.10.2015 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.10.2015 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

14.10.2015 10:21, Irina Nikulina:

male and female

14.10.2015 10:21, Irina Nikulina:

male

14.10.2015 10:21, Irina Nikulina:

male

14.10.2015 10:15, Irina Nikulina:

The author is not me, I will address only the lost photos found on which determined Maria :)

14.10.2015 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Who is the author definition, I do not understand. :))

14.10.2015 9:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Saturniini Gonimbrasia zambesina.

14.10.2015 5:07, Yuri Semejkin:

I have a question about a personal message - inbound and outbound!. Something I have not seen the ability to delete messages or data is not provided?
While incoming and outgoing bit, there is no problem. In the case of accumulation, it becomes uncomfortable, have to use the sliders to spend time searching for the right.Peter! Could you envisage the possibility of users do not need to remove, leaving only what they see fit for the correspondences?

14.10.2015 0:57, Maria Pozdnova:

Thank you, Irina, she is.

14.10.2015 0:24, Irina Nikulina:

Maria Eugenia photo exists at http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/18379, if you mean it. Only this kind of G onimbrasia, views Gonimbrasia zambesina

13.10.2015 23:56, Maria Pozdnova:

Identified by Yevgeny Komarov photos as a Conimbrasia. Formerly photos Komarova address (no longer exists) lepidoptera.pro taxname: 120328. What kind it is similar to now?

13.10.2015 23:07, Peter Khramov:

The idea realized do.

13.10.2015 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=403950&st=0 post 47.

13.10.2015 22:15, Shamil Murtazin:

I forgot to add to the group. Correct =)

13.10.2015 22:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Link oddly is copied ...

13.10.2015 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is well illustrated:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtop...dpost&p=1117631
The lower wings livida the upper edge of the dark and the darkness descends on the outer edge of the wing to the middle of the main color of brick. At tetra wings are much darker, almost brick color, brown. The upper part is not obscured.

13.10.2015 21:36, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, it is necessary to leave inaccurately =) Because here the question bluntly: butterfly 38-40 mm.
So who knows what else, other than the size of A. livida different from A. tetra - tell us, we'll be very grateful)

13.10.2015 21:24, Irina Nikulina:

Reserves photo # 37418

13.10.2015 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, I have this butterfly defined as Amphipyra tetra, photo nature, in the expanded I doubted, but the view named Shamil. :)

13.10.2015 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Shamil Murtazin.

13.10.2015 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Shamil Murtazin.

13.10.2015 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra tetra / Alexandr Zhakov Amphipyra livida / Shamil Murtazin.

13.10.2015 20:28, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

The idea is correct. Share, as is done in the Plantarium. When loading foto.lyubym participant has an opportunity to celebrate "defined by another member of the project" and then you must enter its data in whole or in part with AutoFit.

13.10.2015 20:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

The underside has a little bit: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/45542

13.10.2015 20:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Without underside would not venture to even guess who it is)

13.10.2015 19:59, Fedor Ovechkin:

Cupido argiades?

13.10.2015 19:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Here I think, can it makes sense to give the ability to upload point is determined from the list of sponsors of the site? .. Or can some =)

13.10.2015 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Svyatoslav Knyazev.

13.10.2015 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Svyatoslav Knyazev.

13.10.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

13.10.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

13.10.2015 19:43, Shamil Murtazin:

This is just great! Only such large files will not ship, because then you still need to build upon the field. And it's hard to do in mind strange sort when extracting from the archive (the law which I do not understand). On a similar issue, saying, so I just remind detail =)

13.10.2015 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

13.10.2015 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

13.10.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

13.10.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

13.10.2015 19:11, Shamil Murtazin:

Ieh ... and how they define that? .. =)

13.10.2015 17:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank Il! I'll try to find, but now probably next summer.

13.10.2015 13:18, Irina Nikulina:

Congratulations, Ure! Only on the Japanese site, she met now and would still catch an insect))

13.10.2015 8:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Chrysoperla furcifera, -New Russia's views.

13.10.2015 6:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter - are old pictures of kollektstsi initially small. Share in half - it is very small. Yet the hand reach, and find time to sit down for filming collectible copies - there are several thousand species of Coleoptera.

12.10.2015 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prosopocoilus occipitalis / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

12.10.2015 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Prosopocoilus occipitalis / Igor Ivannikov.

12.10.2015 20:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Reserves photo # 45065

12.10.2015 16:30, Irina Nikulina:

I catch perekopirovat 2 dock sent. If something goes wrong - say, I repeat)

12.10.2015 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Irina, at point blank range do not see how this could be. If this happen again - come to me pliz page code (displayed on the Ctrl + U usually), which references are incorrect.

12.10.2015 12:51, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, the problem may not be the primary, but still need to fix - in the popular species of insects on Ch. page when you open the previews are not always displayed the right kind, in some cases, throws not to the desired form, and on the page of a completely different family (eg, Luehdorfia puziloi - Hesperiidae, Limenitis helmanni - Praydidae, Hypsopygia costalis - Pieridae, some Hyles - Geometridae, one of Parnassius - Sphingidae, well, etc.)

12.10.2015 11:51, Peter Khramov:

Generally, yes, but now I work as usual, ie infa previews for supraspecific taxa is taken from the child views, not the photo directly. In the future, this approach will change, but it is so.

12.10.2015 11:50, Peter Khramov:

Ugums made.

12.10.2015 11:45, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Peter! Now I see. I think that these photos can also be used to demonstrate compliance in the absence of certain taxa to species.

12.10.2015 11:43, Ivan Tislenko:

Yeah. But the thumbnails for the subgenus Hemisphaerica never appeared http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838054

12.10.2015 11:22, Peter Khramov:

Anatoly Plantarium grit that have to login to view the page; -)
In the case of: a similar feature was on the Lepidoptera, but disappeared in the fog in the process of moving to the insects. Now just added and launched again.Now the pages supraspecific taxa displayed thumbnails images that are defined before the taxon or to its subsidiaries supra. If there are many pictures, showing the first 24 of them (go to the page with all fotami possible link there).

12.10.2015 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Leptura quadrifasciata / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

12.10.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Leptura quadrifasciata / Female / Evgeny Komarov.

12.10.2015 8:35, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Shamil! I am writing in detail and do not understand the prevailing logic. When viewing kind Psychoda http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/879989 the presence of species of photos that would be reflected in the thumbnails, and the availability of photos, specific to the kind of no way reflected. It is not logical!

12.10.2015 8:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Anatoly, let's talk in detail. Give the link a loaded image, what kind of a taxon or you have downloaded it.
To view photos in a certain way have to go through the gallery and there to indicate the desired taxon.
For example, back to Psychoda - here on this page have everything: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery?tx=[879989]+Psychoda++[%D0%A0%D0%BE%D0%B4]&taxlev=all&prec=all&fem=0&author=0&live=0&view=0&g=0&size=s&perpage=100&order=dt

12.10.2015 7:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

12.10.2015 7:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

12.10.2015 7:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

12.10.2015 7:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

12.10.2015 7:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

12.10.2015 7:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

12.10.2015 7:07, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Shamil! The problem is that the transition to the specified race I never can see the availability of this picture! This is illogical. For example, as is done in Plantarium with photos, to certain kinds of (similar to a family) - http://www.plantarium.ru/page/pictures/item/44244.html

12.10.2015 3:03, Peter Khramov:

Completed. Try Now.

12.10.2015 3:02, Peter Khramov:

Done.

12.10.2015 0:31, Peter Khramov:

A realized. Now the tree is reconstructed, and for some taxa of the program does not see that this beetles. As reconstructed (to today), everything returns to normal.

12.10.2015 0:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The beetles'm where I can add anything and anywhere.
Although it looked: in barbel can, and no chafer. There was capable curator Scarabaeidae?

11.10.2015 23:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cyprolais hornimani.

11.10.2015 23:56, Peter Khramov:

So you're in a taxon for which you have no rights; -)

11.10.2015 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, later made configurable output.

11.10.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Igor, a good resource: http://lucanesdumonde.skynetblogs.be/
Dig, you can and autumn :)
I pass them: there is a lot of great stag. Its something I can not define the way (((

11.10.2015 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Symptoms Classic
There is simply no fields at the bottom of the page, that ought to fill in (((

11.10.2015 23:11, Shamil Murtazin:

This picture is good. More and hairs from this angle seen =)

11.10.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She is. The old Cyprolais it nonche.

11.10.2015 22:50, Shamil Murtazin:

I see no point to the time of the update, but I still needed a simple tool. Thank you for the clarification! )

Addition: we can somehow change the order of withdrawal? Two columns with a zigzag output = breaking eye when viewing a large number of species in order.Options: first conclusion from the top down in the first column, and then follow-up with the top of the second column is also top down. Option 2 - just one very long column.

11.10.2015 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Hornimani is good. = Cyprolais hornimani Bates, 1877?

11.10.2015 22:36, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, and not separately?

11.10.2015 22:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

11.10.2015 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

11.10.2015 22:12, Shamil Murtazin:

And here - http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/7553 - Capps Russian name written =)

11.10.2015 22:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Anatoly! At the moment, you can "snap" a photo copy of any taxon and / or family. This question Resolved =)
Example: Here is a photo - http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/44135 - tied to the genus Psychoda.

11.10.2015 21:49, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

I am a bit do not understand this important question now is not solved? Only I have not much to certain species, and upload them to the site is now in the pile I do not see the point. After all, some of these photos can be used for illustrations.

11.10.2015 21:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Leptura (s.str.) quadrifasciata L., 1758

11.10.2015 21:07, Peter Khramov:

No. What about him, what are the symptoms?

11.10.2015 20:44, Shamil Murtazin:

And I do not say that they are. Just very similar "by analogy" =)

11.10.2015 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, that with the addition of taxa. Again severed?

11.10.2015 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carcharodus alceae / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

11.10.2015 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Carcharodus floccifera / Alex Lender Carcharodus alceae / Fyodor Pudovikov.

11.10.2015 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander as they are visually distinguished by who does not know :) As I read the works of Asia is almost there. albeit it is worth :)

11.10.2015 18:50, Alexander Belousov:

It is my conclusion from the fact that we have listed only Pontia daplidice. So if it's not Pontia edusa, then its counterpart. Although visually they are very similar!

11.10.2015 16:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Eudicella hornimani Bates, 1877.

11.10.2015 15:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Slightly more laid correct, but too old soap box.

11.10.2015 14:26, Peter Khramov:

Since color "metallic" and removed from the vspyhom forehead, there are color distortion. If there are more correct picture, you will need to replace the graphic view.

11.10.2015 14:23, Peter Khramov:

That's because after moving to clarifying taxa individual trees have not changed everywhere. Ie Parent taxon corrected, and all the wood for the child - not. I think today will be ready.

11.10.2015 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Basil, we use the fauna and other sources (like butterflies). I think it's perfect. With fauna that well - the Old can be more or less centrally for a large number of taxa quote.

11.10.2015 13:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2010-06-12 00:00:00.

11.10.2015 13:43, Denis Potanin:

Saratov reg., Saratov district, d. Sinenky, N 51 ° 15'44.5 "; E 45 ° 46'18.9 "; 11-12.VI.2010

11.10.2015 12:57, Denis Potanin: This species is identified correctly.

11.10.2015 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe diana sachalinensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.10.2015 12:22, Irina Nikulina:

Coenonympha hero

11.10.2015 12:17, Irina Nikulina:

Lethe diana ssp.sachalinensis Matsumura, 1925

11.10.2015 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The coolest label :)

11.10.2015 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2014-05-25 00:00:00.

11.10.2015 11:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

11.10.2015 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2015-07-16 00:00:00.

11.10.2015 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

11.10.2015 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2004-08-12 00:00:00.

11.10.2015 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2002-04-19 00:00:00.

11.10.2015 11:07, Denis Potanin:

Ukraine, Crimea, Sevastopol, rn, n. Mekenzievy Mountain, N 44 ° 39 '29.10 ", E 33 ° 35' 26.30"; 01-12.V.2012

11.10.2015 11:03, Denis Potanin:

Nizhny Novgorod, ZAO "Brewing company" Volga ", malt, malt drying grille; 25.VI.2004

11.10.2015 11:00, Denis Potanin:

Saratov region., Osinski district, 6 km SW of the village. Sinegorsk, N 51 ° 17 '28.14 ", E 49 ° 48' 27.90"; 01-02.V.2009

11.10.2015 10:58, Denis Potanin:

Nizhny Novgorod, 16.VII.2015

11.10.2015 10:57, Denis Potanin:

Saratov region.

11.10.2015 10:55, Denis Potanin:

Nizhny Novgorod region., Navashino district, Navashino, "Navashino Forestry", sawing shop; 12.VIII.2004

11.10.2015 10:53, Denis Potanin:

Nizhny Novgorod region., Dzerzhinsk, OAO "Dzerzhinsky flour mill"; 19.VI.2002

11.10.2015 10:49, Denis Potanin: This species is identified correctly.

11.10.2015 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, keep in mind that the fauna of Europe, I have not used in all cases, but only in those where I can not find the Old in its sources.
For all taxa indiscriminately use it in my opinion it is impossible, and it is necessary to keep a safety net.For some specific groups make better use of resources that are devoted to these groups, rather than a hodgepodge napodobii fauna.

11.10.2015 9:54, Fedor Ovechkin:

Alas!

11.10.2015 9:34, Ivan Tislenko:

For ladybugs on her page after the sort is kind of http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838060
The kind of page it is placed in the subgenus http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/985738
On the page is not it kind of thumbnails for the subgenus Hemisphaerica http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838054

11.10.2015 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fedor, camera angles on top there?
Then we get to the species.

11.10.2015 7:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Eudicella / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.10.2015 4:45, Peter Khramov:

Oleg, we will do something similar.
All: I pay attention that the popular button units can be used not only for continuous operation, but also for quick temporary switch to the appropriate view. For example, for fast selection phot gallery.While the same can be done by entering any taxon in the corresponding field selection, but it is necessary to train more to gain, and so - jabbed a button, and voila.

11.10.2015 4:36, Peter Khramov:

Recently there has been a bad situation when downloading large files of photographs (20-30 megabytes in size). In this case, you could see an error "413 Request Entity Too Large". Now this case is cured, it is safe to load files up to 50 MB weight.

11.10.2015 2:31, Peter Khramov:

The third excavation clarifications (transfer to intermediate taxa) and the second excavation deletions (again, more carefully, cleaned doubles). Changes touched on a couple of tens of thousands of taxa.

11.10.2015 2:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Luehdorfia puziloi lays eggs only Asarum sieboldii and a caterpillar in her very dr.Zdes same sheet of Salix sp. Regarding sawfly - I do not know, maybe?

10.10.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK.

10.10.2015 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Basil, the spread of the fauna of Europe do not add to the species later made centrally once for all with automatic formalization.

10.10.2015 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Foty in the database is, and the files themselves are not present. Who cleaned up.

10.10.2015 22:32, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, look, please, something in my entire day hanging LC 2 types - Lucilia silvarum and Tritoma bipustulata - to illustrate that supposedly there is a second photo. Views of - I have both for only one photo is worth. What kind of a glitch?

10.10.2015 22:17, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, it's just wonderful! Thank you! And in all other improvements too)

10.10.2015 22:13, Peter Khramov:

I remind you that all do not need to start with a dozen or only for the test.

10.10.2015 22:12, Peter Khramov:

Did automatically check and clear illustrations. Now, when you transfer pictures to another taxon will be automatically checks whether a given phot illustration for any taxa (including supra). If is - to illustrate these taxa are reset, and the information about this broadcast we Irina.Now check your hands, it was an illustration or not, as well as write about it in the comments do not need. Well, except for the test to begin with, you can just fire case.

10.10.2015 21:45, Alex Lender:

Sorry, I forgot to immediately merge. Now a photo of the group.

10.10.2015 21:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Now I know who to call, Irina! :)

10.10.2015 21:38, Shamil Murtazin:

But why not a butterfly? You seem withdrawn Luehdorfia puziloi - very similar, but slightly different masonry substrate and the other =) Or you saw the tracks and are sure that this sawfly, for example?

10.10.2015 21:37, Irina Nikulina:

And I also just explained Eugene wrote "somehow", I explained - how)

10.10.2015 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, I just explained Eugene who do it because the question was addressed to me.
A page on the form itself-is also outlined :)

10.10.2015 21:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Alex, the site is a functional association of pictures in a group, in a case where pictures illustrate the different perspectives of the same instance of a living organism. It is done through a personal account - "Edit".
It would be good to combine these two photos (top and underside of the wings).

10.10.2015 21:14, Alex Lender:

Fedor, I put the underside of this butterfly http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/45343

10.10.2015 20:57, Irina Nikulina:

I can not put in the illustration to the form that has not been downloaded to this type of start. After this photo was pereopredeleno.A view was illustrated to override. After redefining my LC signal is not received.After transferring photos to another kind ask the moderators to report if it illustrated the kind of image (this conversation was already), otherwise how can be tracked? Illustration populi is now changed.

10.10.2015 20:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not I change. Irina and Peter are engaged.

10.10.2015 20:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! This image somehow illustrates the page Byctiscus populi!

10.10.2015 20:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

I will not argue, but most of the literature views Pontia edusa absent. Or those that you read the specified, Pontia edusa not found. It replaces Pontia daplidice. , or is it your conclusion.?

10.10.2015 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Vladimir Bryukhov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

10.10.2015 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Vladimir Bryukhov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

10.10.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Vladimir Bryukhov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

10.10.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Vladimir Bryukhov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

10.10.2015 20:19, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Yeah, read already.) Now we must somehow move ...

10.10.2015 19:55, Fyodor Pudovikov:

alceae IMHO

10.10.2015 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It wrote: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/45277

10.10.2015 19:30, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Hmm, but what of the poplar birch different. I found all of their on aspen and willow on the instance.

10.10.2015 18:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, as signs of something they have not changed and can not change. They are forever :)

10.10.2015 18:54, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! Well, you found the source :) It is true, of course, but Plavilshchikov old in my youth :)

10.10.2015 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Basis for this photo. It is not necessary that it lost :)

10.10.2015 18:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Tomorrow will be! Finish.

10.10.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Vladimir Bryukhov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

10.10.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Vladimir Bryukhov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

10.10.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Vladimir Bryukhov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

10.10.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Byctiscus populi / Vladimir Bryukhov Byctiscus betulae / Evgeny Komarov.

10.10.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir objections can not be. Eugene rights to 100%
"Byctiscus 2 species.
1 (2) Single-color, green to blue, sometimes copper.
B. betulae.
2 (1) On top of a metallic green, often with copper or red tide, bottom tёmnosiny.
B. populi "

Plavilshchikov NN (reduced)
I stand.
Vladimir, better identify on the books rather than molbiol: so true :)

10.10.2015 18:16, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, the objections have?

10.10.2015 17:58, Evgeny Komarov:

It Byctiscus betulae (Linnaeus, 1758). Bottom have populi are no copper-red, and all other ...

10.10.2015 17:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

The familyPyrrhocoridae: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/942777 - born Probergrothius Kirkaldy, 1904 and type Probergrothius nigricornis (Stål, 1861). In the subfamilyReduviinae: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/45001 - born Platymeris Laporte, 1833 and type Platymeris biguttatus (Linnaeus, 1767). The genusFormica: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/120894 - subgenera.

10.10.2015 17:18, Fedor Ovechkin:

Rhode Cicada Set twice: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/467111 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/943160

10.10.2015 15:36, Igor Ivannikov:

Photo 45253 instead of 43061.

10.10.2015 15:22, Igor Ivannikov:

Photo 45252 instead of 43063

10.10.2015 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Regarding Basil discussed on the phone. In the case of: everything is ready, counters online ph number of comments and reconfigured.

10.10.2015 15:05, Igor Ivannikov:

Photo 45250 430066 for replacement.

10.10.2015 15:03, Igor Ivannikov:

Photos 45249 43065 for the replacement.

10.10.2015 14:59, Peter Khramov:

On the page of the authors of information about the site is now a man or not, has become much more precise. There corrected statistics photos and comments. Plus a link to the specific comments of the author is now working in the Russian version too (previously only in English).Consider that in the authors page displays information about those who published some materials on the site, not all users of the site. And even a small refinement: on the main page now shows the popularity of the family (and their subsidiaries taxa), not only butterflies, but all insects.And on the main forum page next to the title of each section now displays information about the number of posts / topics in this section.

10.10.2015 12:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.10.2015 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.10.2015 11:59, Fedor Ovechkin:

The subgenus Serviformica Forel, 1913

10.10.2015 11:46, Alexander Belousov:

The books that I have seen in their region - Pontia edusa not found. It replaces Pontia daplidice.

10.10.2015 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The basis for creating a kind: http://szmn.sbras.ru/persons/legalov/legalov046.pdf

10.10.2015 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tatyanaerhynchites aequatus / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

10.10.2015 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tatyanaerhynchites aequatus / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

10.10.2015 10:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypsopygia costalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.10.2015 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blattodea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

10.10.2015 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blattodea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

10.10.2015 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blattodea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

10.10.2015 10:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.10.2015 7:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Shamil, at this time I have not tried anything to grow, only methyl Occurrences and filmed. The first attempts at breeding butterflies undertaken since 2012. And here is likely not butterflies ....

10.10.2015 6:59, Shamil Murtazin:

And these gusyanok failed to withdraw? Or let grow? ..

10.10.2015 6:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Egg stage in question?

10.10.2015 6:37, Shamil Murtazin:

There generally masonry Colorado reminds =)

10.10.2015 4:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Not sure it's eggs.

10.10.2015 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, thank you for your support :)
The fact that this is not an isolated signal over the counter.
I remember I raised this issue was to put it mildly, "not understood" (((......
More importantly (except counters photo) to see who is currently online in order to avoid or minimize the "downloads an overlap."Peter, you'd better not push it too long box))

10.10.2015 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Andrey Ponomarev.

09.10.2015 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, I see. In the solutions for this problem is there, but not in the first place.

09.10.2015 20:25, Peter Khramov:

There is such a thing podzaderzhivayus.

09.10.2015 19:29, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, out. Anywhere they will not get lost, not a lot of photos are of oviposition, most importantly, do not forget to put a sign the appropriate stage of development.
And about yet - at catcher, as is well known, and the animal runs. And not at catcher - not running.

09.10.2015 17:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Argynnis ruslana ?

09.10.2015 15:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aeshna mixta / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

09.10.2015 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, Orient maturity - that we have and when to fotami? ..

09.10.2015 12:53, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.
Day before yesterday.

09.10.2015 11:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aeshna mixta. Where is the date?

09.10.2015 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, why not Pontia edusa?

09.10.2015 7:24, Yuri Semejkin:

There are a few shots ovipositions - presumably beetles and others. Insects. (not Lepidoptera). That I do not know to throw them here-not to throw?, That they have not lost in the mass. And more: Spices masonry seems not.

09.10.2015 7:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea humiliata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.10.2015 7:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cepphis advenaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.10.2015 7:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immorata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.10.2015 6:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Basil! This year I have not always pointed out to me who and where defined. Therefore I never found.

09.10.2015 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dendroxena sexcarinata.

09.10.2015 6:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Meloe lobatus.

09.10.2015 5:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Holotrichia diomphalia.

09.10.2015 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course typo. The name is derived from Manzhouli
Here's your same picture: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/promanse.htm
It says it right :)

09.10.2015 5:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Protaetia Protaetia mandschuriensis.

09.10.2015 3:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Dendroxena sexcarinata

09.10.2015 2:43, Yuri Semejkin:

In my mind recorded mandchiriensis, but P. mandchiriensis not found in the search engines as possible somewhere typo.

09.10.2015 2:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Holotrichia diomphalia Bates, 1888

09.10.2015 2:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Meloe lobatus Gebler , 1832

08.10.2015 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Calliteara pudibunda / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

08.10.2015 22:28, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea humiliata ?

08.10.2015 22:25, Irina Nikulina:

Cepphis advenaria

08.10.2015 22:24, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula immorata

08.10.2015 22:23, Irina Nikulina:

Calliteara pudibunda male

08.10.2015 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptidea / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

08.10.2015 21:47, Alex Lender:

Leptidea sinapis?

08.10.2015 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melitaea athalia / Confidently identified / Male & female / Irina Nikulina.

08.10.2015 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

08.10.2015 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea athalia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.10.2015 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.10.2015 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Actenicerus infirmus.

08.10.2015 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Episcapha morawitzi.

08.10.2015 19:35, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha rosaceana?

08.10.2015 19:19, Irina Nikulina:

Scotopteryx chenopodiata

08.10.2015 17:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Episcapha morawitzi Solsky

08.10.2015 16:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Actenicerus infirmus Reitter, 1892

08.10.2015 16:19, Irina Nikulina:

To put in Melanthia mandschuricata (Bremer, 1864), both in the Catalog Sinev, but there were doubts as We have more Mesoleuca mandschuricata (Bremer, 1864) http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/60938 Clearly, this is one kind of double and must be removed. And doubt, because there are both http://www.catocala.narod.ru/geom94.html and http://olegberlov.narod.ru/geom94.html. How true?

08.10.2015 15:36, Alexander Belousov:

Take Two. Peter, something does not update the number of uploaded photos per page Authors - 691 in stock, but already there is 669 a month.

08.10.2015 14:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And two and a half passed))))

08.10.2015 13:43, Evgeny Komarov:

We are waiting with!

08.10.2015 13:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Cicadetta yezoensis (Matsumura, 1898).

08.10.2015 11:46, Peter Khramov:

Good work.

08.10.2015 10:06, Peter Khramov:

Monday - the deadline. Now I bring more centralized editing over several thousand taxa.

08.10.2015 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Limois emeljanovi / Yuri Semejkin.

08.10.2015 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limois emeljanovi / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

08.10.2015 9:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Clarify. Transferred to a Limois emeljanovi Oshanin, 1908.

08.10.2015 9:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Clarify. Transferred to a Limois emeljanovi Oshanin, 1908.

08.10.2015 8:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Keep Basil - urgently need a system of rules, and then when subfamily Harpalinae illustrates the view from the other subfamily ...

08.10.2015 8:37, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Basil!

08.10.2015 2:19, Peter Khramov:

Citizens are asked to check in what respects each other taxa:
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/49 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/668204
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/30477 and http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/668439

07.10.2015 23:46, Peter Khramov:

I do not remember where it was an indication of the glitch, but present a problem takes some subfamilies and tribes bugs (they mistakenly being prescribed in the name of the author once a year, because they are not identifiable as duplicates) is now fixed.

07.10.2015 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's great, thank you :)

07.10.2015 22:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.10.2015 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.10.2015 22:46, Peter Khramov:

Over 5600 taxa in the database were displayed with all-CAPS authors. For example: Taurrhina longiceps KOLBE, 1892. It's Ok now: Taurrhina longiceps Kolbe, 1892.

07.10.2015 22:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

Platymeris Laporte, 1833
Platymeris biguttatus (Linnaeus, 1767)

07.10.2015 21:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea athalia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2015 21:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea athalia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2015 20:57, Irina Nikulina:

Melitaea athalia

07.10.2015 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter has just appeared on the announcement Zinovsky website (consider it premature): http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/inse_pro.htm
Therefore it is necessary to accelerate bringing the (possible) system in the divine form, in case if there will catch serious people, and there is such a lot.

07.10.2015 19:52, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, simply choose in the Catalog order by Last Update, and here you are: All updates feed: http://insecta.pro/catalog?order=dt
Anatoly, yes, there are such plans. In the meantime, you can use a compromise — the section "My Subscriptions" in the community: http://insecta.pro/community/my

07.10.2015 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Igo Ustimov Oleg Pekarsky.

07.10.2015 16:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Therefore "Uncertain". :)

07.10.2015 16:17, Oleg Pekarsky:

It would be nice to have opportunity to ignore uninteresting taxa inside an order. For example, in Lepidoptera: to choose between butterflies and moths.

07.10.2015 16:13, Oleg Pekarsky:

Yet there is such a possibility.

07.10.2015 15:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, it's not like the ambigua.

07.10.2015 14:10, Irina Nikulina:

Arichanna melanaria askoldinaria (Oberthür, 1880)

07.10.2015 14:08, Oleg Pekarsky:

It can be ambigua

07.10.2015 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Euplexia japonica / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2015 13:55, Oleg Pekarsky:

Yes, it is Euplexia japonica Leech, 1889. There are some cool species in your region!

07.10.2015 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Euxoa temera / Oleg Pekarsky.

07.10.2015 13:42, Oleg Pekarsky:

Euxoa temera

07.10.2015 13:35, Peter Khramov:

Lord, on the curatorial transfers - it's time to do already, but slows me down two things:
1. Summary: tree taxa found major new bugs that are best to treat centrally.
2. General: perhaps will soon make a more convenient way to transfer (interface).Let's agree as follows: maximum, until Monday, I will do everything possible to cure bugs, and add more of the right to a longer brake, even with the glitches, though not.
ZY I do Banner removed if dolepim spetsmagaz users insects, instead of a banner is likely to be a link.

07.10.2015 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

And what happened to the banner store?

07.10.2015 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gnophos sartata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

07.10.2015 10:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe montanata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.10.2015 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's greate for website's users. Think about some additional buttons with pics on the homepage. :)

07.10.2015 9:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Useful!

07.10.2015 7:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Super Peter call and made to work. :)

07.10.2015 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter is now a good idea to come to grips adaptation of forms to download and add information on the form to all insect orders. This is paramount. It is necessary to discuss.
Well, it is necessary to attend predostavleniek curatorial rights (at least those who disagree). The simple addition of taxa is not coaching.It should be still on the shelves correctly and decompose.

07.10.2015 6:58, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

It would be nice to be able to subscribe (mail messages) to comments to your photos and to override. I did not find this here.

07.10.2015 2:24, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, show a dude who did not have restrictions on the troops, new buttons. Comments can unsubscribe in the corresponding news.

07.10.2015 2:13, Peter Khramov:

If you are a fan of dragonflies, beetles, butterflies or other popular insect order, and data about other orders only obstruct you, you can limit the website data to info about your favourite order. To do this, click the button with the name of the order at the top right of any page. As a result, the data in the gallery, community, catalog, classification and the right block with news, updates, popular insect species, etc. will be limited to representatives of your chosen group. To choose a different order, just click on the relevant button, and if you want to come back to see information about all the insects, click All orders button.
Setting is valid for one session — until you close your browser. I expect your comments as well as opinions if it's necessary to expand the options for registered users — to save the settings for your account, to use less popular orders, or any other taxa. Note that in the catalog, gallery and community sections you can limit the output of taxa, photos, comments to any taxon regardless of the setting above.

07.10.2015 0:45, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Irina, thank you. Clear. Just the place did not seem to me like the way, so I'm not such a hypothesis put forward. :)

06.10.2015 23:13, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, is dead. This summer hit at the peak flight of schrenckii, a huge number of butterflies of summer (probably even worn)) low along the forest road from Anisimovka on the hill, they often sits down on the road and fell under the wheels of the rare machines (This is not a guess, she observed.Well uninjured arranged immediately feast, gathering around the dead brothers in groups of 10-20 individuals. It was warm enough, but there was a wild heat and puddles along the road - too.

06.10.2015 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The heat is likely the phenomenon.
This is a similar case with our Aporia Crataegi: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/12940
Then we stood wild butterfly heat and crowds gather around what remains of the puddles.
Many immediately and died in front of (

06.10.2015 22:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ah, the beauty! :)

I have a question: in the photo you can see a few of the dead (?) Butterflies. It seems like this is not the wings (which could stay if they were somebody pecked), but quite the whole specimens, "prilёgshie on the flank" ... From what?

06.10.2015 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Partly podborochka of beetles:
Les Lucanidae du monde: http://lucanesdumonde.skynetblogs.be/
Le blog des Cetoniidae: http://www.cetoniidae.org/
The Dynastidae of the World: http://dynastidae.voila.net/
Carabidae of the World: http://carabidae.org/
ELATERIDAE Click beetles of the palearctic region: http://www.elateridae.com/index.php
Cerambycoidea.com: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/
Old World Cerambycidae: https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/bycidDB/wfamily.asp?w=o
Cerambycidae of the World: http://cerambycidae.org/
Prioninae of the World: http://www.prioninae.eu/
Lamiaires du Monde: http://www.lamiinae.org/80v/

06.10.2015 16:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.10.2015 16:03, Yuri Semejkin:

http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/als_ind.htm
For fans of beetles. !. Index of families, genera and species .; 2. Index species.
You can view images of a plurality of beetles. Page on Google

06.10.2015 15:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Good!

06.10.2015 15:38, Evgeny Komarov:

For bugs (and all other) in the form of load: Perspective: top, bottom, side, front.
When information about adding a for bugs (or maybe all)
1. Food specialization (better course, trophic characteristics, but not all will probably clear) separately imago larva individually.And you can advance the goal the whole set of options (phytophages zoophages, saprophages, coprophagic, Antofagasta polyphage) with the possibility of more detailed decoding (types of food plants favored by the victims, the hosts for parasites, etc.).
2. The period of activity (apart of adults, larvae separately)
3.Hibernating stage (to provide an opportunity to put a tick in several versions, as they can spend the winter at the same time at different stages).
4. It would be necessary to add a number of generations (generations) / period of one generation.
That something like that around!

06.10.2015 15:25, Peter Khramov:

The illustrations on species pages appeared in the average size and you could not enlarge them directly (it was necessary to go to the photo's page first). Now you can zoom both illustrations without going to the photos page, just by clicking on them.

06.10.2015 13:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Limacodidae / Oleg Pekarsky Austrapoda dentata / Irina Nikulina.

06.10.2015 13:37, Irina Nikulina:

http://www.jpmoth.org/Limacodidae/Limacodinae/Austrapoda_dentata.html In Primorye, only 17 species limakodid, all other views (in the neighboring regions and even less - 12).

06.10.2015 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia lactucae / Andrey Ponomarev Cucullia lucifuga / Oleg Pekarsky.

06.10.2015 12:10, Oleg Pekarsky:

Cucullia lucifuga

06.10.2015 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypsopygia costalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.10.2015 8:52, Vera Volkotrub:

Comp have treated, the problem persists and worse - terribly slow (when viewing images), and only in the Russian version, the English all right. For other sites this is not observed. If the case is still in the computer may be who knows that there need to be treated?

06.10.2015 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I think that I cited above - that's all I can say.
Well, perhaps you can still fix my form on the formalization of a caterpillar larva :)
It would be desirable to anyone else spoke with suggestions about changes to these forms.
In the current situation it is really important.

06.10.2015 6:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

06.10.2015 5:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I admit that it is derived from the fact that the author still has the ability to edit for a while in his lux, and at this time his picture are determined and transferred.
Then it was loaded on the fly-defined types except Scarabs (these comrades photo in most cases only to roll) and wait until the morning I did not.Admit it: simply unacceptable luxury in this case "do tomorrow what you can do today."
The same is not negotiable: it is, alas, a technical fix and that there is no way.

06.10.2015 5:25, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

06.10.2015 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What's there in the system area. And so everything is clear by the comments.
Just have something to do with it, and not to discuss.
Initial identification and transfer - 03.10.2015 23:47
Repeated transfer - 04.10.2015 6:08

06.10.2015 0:39, Peter Khramov:

About nightmare with identification info - details plizz to moderators topic. What's wrong.

06.10.2015 0:29, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, write the list of fields that are relevant for the beetles.

06.10.2015 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stenichneumon militarius / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

06.10.2015 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sciophila / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov.

05.10.2015 23:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scarabaeus / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

05.10.2015 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To beetles on three counts of "Adding a form" require processing:
1) "The lifetime of the tracks."
It is necessary to replace the caterpillars larvae.
2) "Forage plants caterpillars."
Caterpillars again be replaced by the larvae and exclude plants (larval beetles can prey and eat all of anything except plants until fall and faeces).3) "For more information about the caterpillar stage."
Again, replace caterpillar larva.
Well, to me personally in the form of signs of formalization severely lacking field "The average size of" (inside and out) which will indicate the average length of the beetle. Fields "Wingspan" and "The length of the front wing" for the beetles are not suitable.
With all this it is necessary to do something.The existing form of strongly binds to work.

05.10.2015 22:58, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, fixed.

05.10.2015 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's not it.

05.10.2015 21:48, Vladimir Deryabin:

Gnophos dumetata?

05.10.2015 19:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.10.2015 19:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.10.2015 17:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter, I have read the summary. Another of you did not expect. It will be an opportunity and deliver. Now pictures anywhere from here is not going anywhere. Maybe when and to whom will fit.

05.10.2015 15:45, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, and the other for your ph see in the foreseeable future will add.

05.10.2015 14:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That is the Copper-Isis, who sang Jean Henri Fabre in his "Entomological memories":
"I know it only by the images, but these images are so striking that I in my old age takes dreamed as a young man, how would you like to wander the banks of the Nile, in Nubia, to under piles of camel dung to learn the life of the insect,is the personification of Isis - the divine power of nature, which fertilizes Osiris - the sun. "

05.10.2015 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

What kind of IRA accurately pointed agree. Type I would have said jankowskii, but this one photo on the network.
It is necessary to have chebur mobiole ask.

05.10.2015 12:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Unfortunately no.

05.10.2015 12:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, and supplementary feeding caterpillar?

05.10.2015 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Neocifuna / Irina Nikulina.

05.10.2015 12:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank Il!

05.10.2015 12:10, Irina Nikulina:

I think this is one of your two Neocifuna, most likely, Neocifuna jankowskii http://blog.daum.net/_blog/BlogTypeView.do?blogid=07cyz&articleno=15873765&categoryId=763636®dt=20131013172303, there is a caterpillar late age. Well, just in case Neocifuna eurydice http://www.jpmoth.org/Lymantriidae/Ilema_eurydice.html, then she Ilema eurydice.In any case, the larvae of both species are polyphagous, feed on about the same - at various broad-leaved species of wood, most often on the Manchurian apple (Malus mandshurica), and another on the Amur grape (Vitis amurensis).

05.10.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

05.10.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthoptera / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub.

05.10.2015 8:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Epidaus tuberosus Yang., 1940

05.10.2015 6:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On any page of Aida, in the header to the field "Comment":
"You can read user comments and leave. If your message relates not type Butterflies , and the photos, this kind of illustrating, please leave your comments precisely on photo page (link at top right)."
It is correct "Butterfly" to "insect"

05.10.2015 1:12, Igor Ivannikov:

The label and written. Astrakhan. Misprint came out, who does not happen. Thank Basil. :-)

04.10.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aeshna juncea / Imago / Igor Sakhno Aeshna mixta / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

04.10.2015 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sympetrum sanguineum / Anatoliy Kuzmin Sympetrum striolatum / Eugene Karolinskiy.

04.10.2015 22:54, Eugene Karolinskiy:

S. striolatum

04.10.2015 22:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

10/15/2015? Today, October 4. Something wrong. :)

04.10.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.10.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lestes viridis / Igor Sakhno Lestes barbarus / Eugene Karolinskiy.

04.10.2015 22:48, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ae. mixta

04.10.2015 22:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. barbarus

04.10.2015 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way, if anyone has a desire to shoot in view of the nature of a normal camera - next summer I took on the point where the beetle has been an abundance of June 14 this year.
True point, not the Moscow region from which the specimens. This point has already ruined and now there is not only not a sideshow: there is not one at all ((
The new point is approx. 120 km.from Moscow, in the Vladimir region. + More a few kilometers. from the train. platform on the forest.
I repeat: we kind of locale and infrequent and that it was caught in nature need to be in the right place at the right time.
So, if you want - you are welcome :))

04.10.2015 22:45, Irina Nikulina:

Peter put seaside Nolinae, found doubles kinds http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/23440. Gone, just in case of both genera - Rhynchopalpus and Meganola, found more 6-7 doubles.The question is - does it make sense now everything is on site or to register now, just take note and write, when all curatorial rights are restored?And already accumulated a lot of things to fix
Above wrote about self-doubt of the correctness of the definitions, without confirmation, and now need to be cleaned 3 page types from Eugene overdetermined. Karolinska photo. Peter, maybe ask Eugene dragonflies in charge? It is not so much work.

04.10.2015 22:16, Evgeny Komarov:

These and other types of Scarabaeus can be one of the two - boeberi or transcaspicus. Size / quality of photos is not possible to determine to species, and given that one of the images that avtorp was specified instead of the Arkhangelsk region Astrakhan ie ... The geography is not working.

04.10.2015 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just I feel it is such a hasty loading taxa, which is no one to deal with smells in the future unnecessary crap in the fifth point and a headache for all of us, no matter how special they are determined. That's why I have such an opinion.
In the words of Comrade CAAX: "Why hurry, no need to hurry!" :)

04.10.2015 21:18, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, no photos of better quality, better such than no.

04.10.2015 21:14, Peter Khramov:

If you will experience something else is not - reported.

04.10.2015 21:12, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, then confirm) to throw in the English version. But just after the edit , after the first write everything was normal.

04.10.2015 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, now everything is normal. And I swear to throw :)

04.10.2015 21:06, Peter Khramov:

Basil should not be such now checked again - all the rules. Check, too, even just once.

04.10.2015 21:05, Peter Khramov:

Vasily was quite entitled to an opinion on the issue of life (although I did not support it). It is not in the opinion itself.
I offer and Basil, and the other moderators / facilitators / power metal juzverej:
1. If a certain recommendation has already been discussed, and on it we have come to some decision, then express it on the public can and should be.
2.If the recommendation has not yet been discussed, let's first discuss it in the system area, and then make conclusions to the people.
Otherwise, in the minds of the people can form a trust limit confusion plus slegontsa falls.
ZY Basil, about the question itself, I'll call you and explain everything.
Zzy One more thing. Lord. Please shift in the system area all doubts / statements on a small number of curators, sucks the whole system and all that that look ship will sink. No doubt, much less defeatism with TZ Team captain can not be otherwise, and though all utopnet. And here you are the captain. Do not forget about it.

04.10.2015 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The quotation marks do not see the point :)
If it were, who is currently working with the bugs, damselflies, etc., There was a sense. But not now.
At most I overlooked something what fraction of this kind in Malaysia:

There are some interesting animals, but has not even straighten, is not determined (although it may have already taxa in the database) and not going to spread on the site until the person who will deal with them. I see the harm in a hurry. You can not rush things. Now we have to give priority to those groups who have someone to supervise.

04.10.2015 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Remove excess - it was a topic for discussion in the system area and not in the comments to this picture.
For those who were any doubts / questions during the existence of deleted comments, write summary:
1. Photos, which is a view that is not already in the database site, you need to download and.Wait for the relevant taxa do not need to (do not worry if they will come later than the pictures for them).
2. If you know the name / regalia determine the type of the photo, then if he does not mind, please include this information in a note or comment to the photograph.

04.10.2015 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Less of "fair" requests and everything will be fine. :)

04.10.2015 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes I really did not understand :) Far comes. It all began with my fair request to the person. I leave here.
Best of three kinds of long-horned beetles Daubal, two of which are on the website are no photos.

04.10.2015 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, are you talking about?

04.10.2015 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So who is right and who is not is not for us to judge one another (for it more suitable kitchen or shop at the entrance).
I saw in this decision.
A negative attitude to the site for people not to comment on the forum, and the curve of the original classification (butterflies), to which people do not want to work.

04.10.2015 19:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, a negative attitude to the site, I said why, and to aggravate it does not have to. No one pull is not necessary. We must think when people write that either. Irina has not prompted the decisions, she said, you're wrong.

04.10.2015 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, a decision prompted by the theme.
If specialists from BPI have no objection to mention their name on the website, for some reason would not offer them to register on the site and take an honorable burden on the distribution of taxa in places in which they are specialists?
Especially on the fauna of the Far East in the network no serious local resources.The site has grown and now more than ever need a new cadre.

I myself have to communicate with people, and the picture is different.
Many people not only do not like the site, but also strictly forbidden even to mention their name here (I will not specify on personalities, but it is a fact) (
Of course there are pleasant exceptions: Pavel Morozov, Lesch Vishnyakov, etc.(honor and praise them for it), but mostly related to the site the majority of the people of Moscow entomological negative ((
Maybe in the Far East and other people ...... I do not know.
If so, why, they would not actually take up coaching in bugs, damselflies, etc.
It should be welcomed :)

04.10.2015 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

04.10.2015 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

04.10.2015 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

04.10.2015 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

04.10.2015 17:07, Irina Nikulina:

This is a reason to ordinary users who are given the opportunity to put your stuff on reared up insecta.pro website, hard to understand. And if "overgrown", this problem is not likely to them. I would add that for many years the shooting of insects in the Jura have a lot of interesting material GB and the ability to tightly contact with the special-s of the BPI.He was glad the contrary, that as long as he has the opportunity, at last, you can place a rare species of ET-site and continues to define the remaining in BPI. He tries to put exactly what has reliably determined. And specialists allowed to refer to them.I, for example, more concerned with the correct definition (not butterflies), when there is no reference to determine how the Jura. (Peter, sorry for the repetition, you have voiced this doubt).How they can be trusted? Tens illustrate the types of daily and I think - and if not properly zarastёm certain the pictures in the internet photos?) As butterflies beetles there who check the rest ..?
Maybe still recommend customize application layman point where there was a definition - who determined the site where identified, a reference to the book (determinant), etc. ?

04.10.2015 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I will not say anything. If the human mind - to understand himself what reason spraedlivogo nothing but my request was not.

04.10.2015 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, after editing comments (pressing the "send") throws to the main page of the English version. Do not eat well (

04.10.2015 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, so let the ship. God bless him.
No person attacking.
Just based on the real situation of affairs at the site made a request to delay the loading of photos taxa, which is on the site there is no one to lay out on the shelves.
Zhukov scattered from the admin area, but for those do not even know who will undertake (
And these all continue to boot ....Speaking of age: he fifty dollars in six months to exchange and, therefore, already have the right to request to speak :)

04.10.2015 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.10.2015 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.10.2015 15:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, on the one hand, I understand you will not know how to hang, but it interferes with someone? Well, would hang out on the site in 2000 of uncertain or more, so what? It is wrong to people aged. Yuri tries to raise the information content of the site itself is the people who determine his troops, who have no one detects it and you wait for Georgia.Let the ship more, then quickly finds Peter, who will add taxa, and no visyak in the admin area, there is no problem :)))

04.10.2015 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

04.10.2015 14:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cyphocleonus / Shamil Murtazin Cyphocleonus dealbatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cyphocleonus / Shamil Murtazin Cyphocleonus dealbatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 14:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Reminding the postponement of the form is or not? Cyphocleonus dealbatus is in the database =)

04.10.2015 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe for points. But while this is all I can offer.
Forms are in my collection and do not get out of there.
As soon as possible - peresnimu and replaced.
This kind of the way we have is local and that his photograph in nature or have to raise once again the point to know.

04.10.2015 13:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, I understand, no doubt, by the definition of business, and that the photo is not suitable to illustrate the differences between closely related species! Himself realize that the last 3 photos Agapanthia in these photos are the same. Is there any reason? It is for points.

04.10.2015 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Forms can not be smaller my camera to shoot high-resolution, alas.
As to the definition, it neoprovergaemo. The MoD Agapanthia violacea (views which can be lured) absent.
We have only one A. intermedia.

04.10.2015 13:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! On Zinovsky site still picture Pseudadoretus phthisicus, made in Kazakhstan, accompanied by the comment "In Russia there is no", although the first was assembled by me, the commercials in 1980, and published information about it in 2002. Including If kind is in Iran, why would not he be in Azerbaijan :)

04.10.2015 12:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, and that you yourself are fine photo Georgia? After all, at an altitude of 800 possible! What can we see? In this photo can not be distinguished from the kind of family!

04.10.2015 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way, about the site http://cerambycidae.org/ I found just in case.
There's enough there are well-known Russian specialists for barbel.
Denis Kasatkin: http://cerambycidae.org/user/Denis+Kasatkin
And Andrey Shapovalov: http://cerambycidae.org/user/Andrey+Shapovalov
These are two recognized experts in the group.
They Zinovsky on the site:
Denis: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/kasatkin.htm
Andrew: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/shapoval.htm
Andrew at all now part of the editorial board Zinovskogo site.
On this basis, I have good reason to trust the site Cerambycidae of the World.

04.10.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Normal posts, Alexander. Overgrown and I'll just replied to a thread.
Now all the admin panel is full of bugs and other photos. Insect is from Yuri Semeykina (except for a few mattresses on Dmitri), and so I asked the author not to aggravate further, because now do them online simply no one. And I do not see anything criminal.Who is doing at the moment: Peter, you or me? That's it: no one. Because it is not ours.
Is Yuri more cargo nobody until then?

04.10.2015 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

View does not provide for Azerbaijan.
In the office. sources it is only for Iran.
However determined the names of garbage and say for what kind exist in Azerbaijan.

04.10.2015 10:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, and why you recommend not to load photos of insects to the site, if you do not know them? http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/44759
It's your personal opinion? and what created http://insecta.pro? For the beetles? What does it mean temporarily? and if the supervisor has two years will not be. Since Peter swung at all insects, and so let all the ship without limitation, to the same defined only add taxon.Basil, let's gag in this plan not to drive. And do not take on someone else's burden. You can speak as a personal opinion as a wish, not as a recommendation.Last Post Actually, I do not even know how to say: What personal responsibility ?, that will shoot the penalty or take? Well, it is not defined who plays the role? Well, you did not once wrote, I determine that enough, or to transfer, I trust him .Basil, which serves as the basis for adding taxon, if the view is already defined? And who at you shift the responsibility for adding new taxa? You yourself in beetles adds that you want. Maybe I'm sure you did not understand what you mean, but it is very unclear look your posts. And I with them did not agree.

04.10.2015 6:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's a nightmare to some ((
All of yesterday's definitions flew ((
Corrected.

04.10.2015 6:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protaetia lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protaetia lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphylla fullo / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphylla alba / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphylla alba / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella aethiopica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella aethiopica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella aethiopica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scarabaeus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scarabaeus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Synapsis tmolus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Synapsis tmolus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enoplocerus armillatus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 6:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enoplocerus armillatus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 5:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aeolesthes sarta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.10.2015 2:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Aphilaenus ferrugineus Mel Identified Emelyanov AF ZIN.

04.10.2015 0:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Unfortunately, the images of this size can only determine the geography, alas. Igor and larger pictures can not we do?

03.10.2015 23:54, Igor Ivannikov:

Tomorrow I will specify. Like Ethiopia.

03.10.2015 23:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella aethiopica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protaetia lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protaetia lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Saved by the fact that around the old one because it is painted.
In general the geography specified (at least priblitelno) - paramount.
Or, alternatively, if there is geography - it does not place a photo indefinite insects (especially exotic).

03.10.2015 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella aethiopica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudicella aethiopica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Burnt and killed long existence in the collection (((.

03.10.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aeolesthes sarta / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphylla fullo / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphylla alba / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sroda in the Arkhangelsk region was not Dosanga and were carried out by representatives of the genus Polyphylla :)

03.10.2015 23:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Igor! Correct Arkhangelsk to Astrakhan!

03.10.2015 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.10.2015 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphylla alba / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the beast?

03.10.2015 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alas, the photo of the genus species is almost impossible to determine.

03.10.2015 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scarabaeus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 23:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scarabaeus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Synapsis tmolus / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 22:29, Peter Khramov:

...and a few multilangual problems were fixed too...

03.10.2015 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.10.2015 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enoplocerus armillatus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enoplocerus armillatus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2015 15:32, Vera Volkotrub:

Peter, it's all right, thank you. We will deal with the computer.

03.10.2015 15:00, Peter Khramov:

We will move it later.

03.10.2015 14:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.10.2015 12:52, Alexander Belousov:

Peter, the number of uploaded photos (Authors page) went out of date: it's still 669 (must be 691).

03.10.2015 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

03.10.2015 11:38, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

03.10.2015 9:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Excellent !!!

03.10.2015 7:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I tried to find it in three browsers (Opera, IE, FF). Not a single problem like Vera described.
It seems to me that the cause of the problem in the user's computer. Not in the browser.

03.10.2015 1:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.10.2015 1:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.10.2015 1:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.10.2015 1:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.10.2015 0:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"The Whitest beetle in the world"
I do not know if it is right, but I think it's a great theme for our blog :)
If anyone is interested, he can read about these beetles:
http://www.vokrugsveta.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=823
http://animalworld.com.ua/news/Raskryt-sekret-samyh-belyh-v-mire-zhukov
The phenomenon is quite unusual actually.


"Самый белый жук на свете"
Не знаю насколько это правдоподобное утверждение, но по моему получится отличная тема для блога :)
Если кому-нибудь это интересно, то можно почитать об этих жуках по ссылкам:
http://www.vokrugsveta.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=823
http://animalworld.com.ua/news/Raskryt-sekret-samyh-belyh-v-mire-zhukov
Явление довольно необычное на самом деле.

03.10.2015 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Browser is FF, right? In any way I can not repeat this. Guys, can you repeat something like it?
PS Inserting images, you need to use file address, not a link to a page with it.

02.10.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, then I can not help nakosyachil lightly and I want to ask to fix it.
We must view this one: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1031933
Send here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1031936 (combine)
The thing is that there are two kinds of the same name Schoenherria
One kind is in the Curculionidae , and another in the Scarabaeidae
"Namesake" .... tudyt them ......
So I made a mistake to view cockchafer Schoenherria argus (Burmeister, 1855) in Curculionidae.Trite confused (
And Khrushchev this is the picture. Therefore appearance did.

02.10.2015 14:01, Vera Volkotrub:

It is another program, don't mind it.

02.10.2015 13:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, I'm in the fields until Monday. is a special case, where the whole race we must endure in the subgenus. when the transfer function is enabled do.

02.10.2015 13:30, Peter Khramov:

And below that there are on-screen buttons such as starting or something else with that?

02.10.2015 12:58, Vera Volkotrub:

Through time

02.10.2015 12:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Koreocerus koreanus Mats.

02.10.2015 12:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Aphilaenus ferrugineus Mel Identified Ostapenko KA

02.10.2015 10:51, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, this kind http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/11546 to bear or vice versa, back? See. Comments on the page.

02.10.2015 10:49, Peter Khramov:

Vera, I checked it, it's Ok. Please, check again and, if the problem persists, please send me a screenshot of the page.
Ivan, thanks for the comment. Corrected.

02.10.2015 10:22, Ivan Tislenko:

If the Russian versions of the website in the search box to query and click "Search" (without selecting options from the pop-up menu), then moves to the English version

02.10.2015 10:16, Sergey Novitckiy:

Should be moved to the page to Dichagyris signifera.

02.10.2015 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Any fresh thoughts about this creature identification?

01.10.2015 23:52, Peter Khramov:

Yes, this question has already been raised. Some fields will be universal for all, others - on different squads, sometimes by families.

01.10.2015 23:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Absolutely logical!

01.10.2015 23:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, here's another "phantom pain" from the Lepidoptera: see the menu when you try to open the "Add Video Info" Imagine, and it's not a butterfly. Much needs to be changed. Need universalization, therefore, we think together.

01.10.2015 23:14, Peter Khramov:

As part of a class families are already too many to display their list as one of the parameters. Now, instead of families derived units, and if you need to limit the selection of a family (or any other level taxon) - use the "Custom taxon."

01.10.2015 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Mend now issued valid references for both versions.

01.10.2015 20:52, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Conistra vaccinii / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov Conistra veronicae / Confidently identified / Oleg Pekarsky.

01.10.2015 20:35, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

01.10.2015 20:34, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

01.10.2015 20:32, Oleg Pekarsky:

Conistra veronicae (Hübner, [1813])

01.10.2015 20:27, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

01.10.2015 20:27, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

01.10.2015 19:44, Irina Nikulina:

I think that Austrapoda dentata

01.10.2015 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Hadena magnolii / Oleg Pekarsky.

01.10.2015 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Limacodidae / Oleg Pekarsky.

01.10.2015 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Agreed.

01.10.2015 14:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I commented tribes in the subfamily Harpalinae of Carabidae family. About 80% must be transferred to other subfamilies. With much to carry and what to add. Later, I'll check all the family!

01.10.2015 14:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Peridroma saucia / Oleg Pekarsky.

01.10.2015 13:53, Oleg Pekarsky:

Peridroma saucia (Hübner, 1808)

01.10.2015 13:46, Oleg Pekarsky:

Limacodidae sp.

01.10.2015 13:43, Oleg Pekarsky:

Hadena magnolii

01.10.2015 12:40, Shamil Murtazin:

In the right column at the bottom is the "Latest updates" extreme and three modified species. Here I would like to see more of these kinds of "novoizmenёnnyh"

01.10.2015 12:14, Vera Volkotrub:

I can upload a photo in Berea Russian site. In the "Download site" no boot keys and strings.

01.10.2015 11:31, Peter Khramov:

Vida is not in the database.

01.10.2015 11:30, Peter Khramov:

As for the line:
If you do not know the size of the insect on the photo, then draw a line fail.
If you know the size of an insect, what line?
As for the tape changes:
What do you mean? Hyphenation or taxa?

01.10.2015 11:27, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, now realized. I thought it was you from editing the data on the type, rather than fotah. This thing corrected, and now everything is OK.
Eugene, remember this, soon repaired, but not both at once, there is a little more complicated issue is resolved.

01.10.2015 9:10, Vera Volkotrub:

Yes.

01.10.2015 8:59, Shamil Murtazin:

I have a question: how to view the tape changes in the pages of the form? ..

01.10.2015 8:40, Evgeny Komarov:

The same is true if in the Search box to enter any taxon. Tucson is located, but in the English version.

01.10.2015 8:16, Shamil Murtazin:

It is necessary to enter the site, click on the "Editing", and then click on the link under the photo on the page in any kind - as a result of the link works correctly, open the required form, but in the "English-speaking" form.

01.10.2015 1:17, Peter Khramov:

Ok, we call each other.

30.09.2015 22:30, Shamil Murtazin:

There are of course, do not just write ...

30.09.2015 22:28, Peter Khramov:

Under the shelf meaning taxon-based site?

30.09.2015 22:27, Peter Khramov:

Irina, thanks for the tip, corrected.
Shamil, I do not see this - everything is fine refunded. Try one more time to check if the bug will have to call up and check together.

30.09.2015 20:52, Shamil Murtazin:

In the transition from the "Edit" on the page of the form - you get to the "English" version of the site.

30.09.2015 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Protaetia lugubris / Igor Sakhno.

30.09.2015 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Protaetia lugubris / Igor Sakhno.

30.09.2015 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.09.2015 20:06, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2015 20:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Igor, it is better not to put these kinds of a dandelion, they prefer juices flowing, so if flowers, most thistles.

30.09.2015 19:39, Igor Sakhno:

Protaetia (Liocola) marmorata

30.09.2015 19:27, Igor Sakhno:

Protaetia (Liocola) marmorata

30.09.2015 8:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis philyra / Imago / Alex Dumchus Neptis philyroides / Male / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2015 8:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, I would have thought so. Male. Irina, forget everything you send the book Butterflies of China))))

30.09.2015 7:53, Vera Volkotrub:

Synonymous or not shelves?

30.09.2015 1:28, Irina Nikulina:

It Neptis philyroides. Characteristic features already discussed here http://insecta.pro/gallery/21457 and to compare 2 full image types: Neptis philyroides http://www.nabistory.co.kr/nabi-htm/109.htm and Neptis philyra http: //www.nabistory.co.kr/nabi-htm/108.htm

30.09.2015 0:16, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, you come to the page of any kind, and does not affect the right of a list of other species.

29.09.2015 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, see mend.

29.09.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 22:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Re-set.

29.09.2015 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 22:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 22:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, you're very well defined. I do not know these types. But on all the sites you can see the difference in the width of the brown outer sling and the angle at which it comes to the inner edge of the costal margin of wing. In sinica generally somewhat narrower and fits almost perpendicular to, and at suitable hilarata wider and at an acute angle, and indeed almost always with two teeth.:) That's what I saw.

29.09.2015 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 21:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 21:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parasa hilarata / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2015 20:20, Irina Nikulina:

Help Wanted. 2 first photos of 7 set to Parasa sinica , about the remaining 5'm not sure - do not Parasa hilarata Do they? I decided with the help of professionals to understand the differences between these two closely related species. Both species are quite common in Primorye, habitat and time of flight of similar caterpillars develop on the same plant.She found only one indication of their difference in a statement Grgoreva GA (cajarc) - color LC http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=199328&view=findpost&p=870889. There is a well illustrated http://szmn.sbras.ru/picts/Heterocera/Limacodidae/Latoia_sinica.htm
and http://szmn.sbras.ru/picts/Heterocera/Limacodidae/Latoia_hilarata.htm
I do not know what there is external differences, is it possible to confidently determine the form, if not see the top of the LC.Among my - at least five butterflies smooth border boundary brown zone and a spike brown root zone. In a network with such gear often form borders meet exactly hilarata http://gaga.biodiv.tw/9702bx/375.htm http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/3f/d8 /7e.html have sinica border smoother http://www.jpmoth.org/Limacodidae/Limacodinae/Parasa_sinica.html http://www2.nrm.se/en/lep_nrm/s/parasa_sinicajaponibia .html
At the same time molbiole Grigoriev GAYevgeny Komarov photos identified with a small notched projection boundaries as sinica http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=199328&view=findpost&p=1500760

29.09.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2015 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stenocorus meridianus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.09.2015 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

29.09.2015 12:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Confidently identified / Robot Apamea lateritia / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.09.2015 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Robot Aspitates ochrearia / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.09.2015 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Robot Cupido / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.09.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Coenonympha glycerion / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.09.2015 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Irina that this definition is in doubt. 1. The male form of the antennae.
2. The location and shape of the dark bands on the upper wings. 3. black spot on the upper wings () its complete absence). 4. Form the top of the upper wing. 5. The presence of the gray bands on the upper and lower wing. 6.form the outer edge of the wing, a smoothed, even in comparison with males Ctenognophos grandinaria.
All these speak against Ctenognophos grandinaria, probably it is necessary once again to disturb Belyaev. With confidence that this Anticypella diffusaria also can not say. :) But very similar.

29.09.2015 12:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2015 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2015 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2015 9:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! When you go to the page view from the search site to fly from Russian to English version!

29.09.2015 8:58, Fedor Ovechkin:

It would be necessary to add a genus and species.

29.09.2015 8:32, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

29.09.2015 5:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Specialists are different, this is the first, the second - no spec is immune from mistakes and the third is better to have a list of taxa (taxon) in the region with mistakes than not to have any. The errors in these lists, alas, will always be. Therefore, the opinion of Michael lovers - his personal opinion, is eligible. By the way, in the way he Cortodera once ponaopisyval ...True and then himself in posvodil synonyms :)

29.09.2015 4:36, Yuri Semejkin:

His name is Andrew Przhiboro ZIN. According to him I add a little about the family and about him. Engaged in water and semi-aquatic Diptera, including working with this family (fauna, ecology) and even once published the first in Russian determinant of larvae and pupae Psychodidae.In Russia, in this family there was never anyone (except subfamily Phlebotominae - mosquitoes), and the group has not been studied much. Species composition in the Maritime region is known for probably 5 percent.

29.09.2015 2:41, Peter Khramov:

Connected shop number for insects and conducted explanatory work among the people. Now, all the issues related to the site and insects can call on the Moscow number: +7 (495) 255-00-95 and a free line for regions 8 (800) 775-60-95 (free calls to mobile and fixed phones for all region of Russia).If I'm not on the site - you will answer the most frequently asked technical questions such as lost passwords, and other things like that, and if I will be on the tube - that poreshat all technical and non-technical issues and nevoprosy.

29.09.2015 2:28, Peter Khramov:

Lepidoptera.pro website has been upgraded to Insecta.pro. Now we've got data about butterflies, beetles, dragonflies and other insects.

28.09.2015 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.09.2015 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, we have tama. And where are you there?

28.09.2015 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes. Information about the region by transferring to gigantinum Sinev

28.09.2015 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Information about the region on the same shift to Sinev gigantinum?

28.09.2015 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Ok, too, will be 10 in Moscow.

28.09.2015 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Welcome, 22:00.

28.09.2015 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

28.09.2015 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae / Vera Volkotrub Plebejus argus / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.09.2015 19:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. argus

28.09.2015 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will, but at 22:00. Not before, unfortunately

28.09.2015 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, the transfer of the right, pick up the pictures. Both types of leave in the catalog. :)

28.09.2015 17:51, Peter Khramov:

Summary: correct transfer photos and illustrations from Pterostoma sinicum we remove?

28.09.2015 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, Vasily reports that he wrote Pavel Morozov. There was confusion with the names, and called the name of one kind of another, in 2008, figured in the future everything is going right.

28.09.2015 17:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! It's not about DV. Basil says about the whole country. In our country the kind of P. sinicum not. The presence of this type many sources. He also writes about her Dubatolov

28.09.2015 17:11, Peter Khramov:

Basil, how are you? Can you?

28.09.2015 16:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tonight I can be on Skype :)

28.09.2015 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

The issue is complex, but the network is all there. Recent work on the Corydalis for DV is Pterostoma gigantina, all that is driven in the literature for Yuri Pterostoma sinicum, refers to Pterostoma gigantina. Where is the error occurred. View Pterostoma gigantina described Holdings. from Primorye and they are stored in Berlin. View Pterostoma sinicum described from China. All cited in the Russian literature, for Pterostoma sinicum refers to Pterostoma gigantina.

28.09.2015 16:00, Peter Khramov:

The fact that the expert is not equal to a diploma. Uzho discussed.

28.09.2015 15:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Good. I will make this request. Without the consent I do not give references.

28.09.2015 15:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well, I have published more than once))) And what these things mean?

28.09.2015 15:38, Peter Khramov:

I suggest in all cases when consulting specials do not mind, to indicate his name.

28.09.2015 15:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Determination on the shot, and the family as a whole can be closed.
Here is the statement of a specialist.
Photo is quite satisfactory, and there is no doubt that this is really Psychodidae.But a more precise definition, unfortunately, it is impossible - it is necessary to see the subtle signs, especially the genitals and the details of venation,
which can be seen mainly in the formulation, in any case, it is not visible in the figure.
The general appearance can be assumed that it is representative of the subfamily and tribe Psychodinae Telmatoscopini.In particular, it belongs to this tribe and some widespread synanthropic species, which often catch the eye. But it is in any case not a definition, but only my guess.
Identify Psychodidae can only be mounted on the material, but not the photo.This photo on body length (10-12 mm), if it seems to me greatly exaggerated - all known to me Psychodidae much smaller.
That is probably all that I can tell by the photos.

28.09.2015 15:05, Peter Khramov:

Her. I think "about the '+' out of context '+' almost on the same '+' Well, the theme is the same," does not always = what, in fact, said the author.
A quotation of the Samara region in general is not seen, and here the fans, because it is good to all of the text before your eyes have for the sake of discussion.Offhand same - the science is not the definition of harm fans and experts, who use the raw data of fans in their scientific papers. It is if we assume that the fans do not be published.If a fan can publish some work under the guise of spices, then that's another problem (from the category of free purchase of diplomas and other degrees in subways and other Internet).

28.09.2015 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis frosya / Confidently identified / Oleg Pekarsky.

28.09.2015 13:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Do you think in the opposite sense to audit the quotation?

28.09.2015 13:30, Peter Khramov:

I could be wrong, more data as it is not even his student years, but still in general and Russian names are always written with a small letter. Not counting, of course, the beginning of the offer, and other similar cases, or when really want to highlight the name in the text, and other means do not have. The latter - for the spoken version. In the book - only smaller.

28.09.2015 13:27, Peter Khramov:

It does not help, there are these quotes are exactly the same amount and exactly the same out of context, as you have here: -)

28.09.2015 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Regulation is not, who it wants and writes. How not to write things right.

28.09.2015 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, I myself until I read an article all clear, time goes by, I can not remember. :) Again, it is necessary to look.
Article freely available on the network.

28.09.2015 12:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Article is nothing at all and not always at hand)))

28.09.2015 12:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

You google banned? http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/danile14.htm

28.09.2015 12:16, Peter Khramov:

The review did not see, so perhaps will not comment.

28.09.2015 11:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vera Volkotrub Oleg Pekarsky.

28.09.2015 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

When you read an article like the questions do not arise. :) Even without the involvement of heavy artilerii.

28.09.2015 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Actias artemis / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Slobodskoy Actias sjoqvisti / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.09.2015 11:49, Yuri Semejkin:

If to be honest, yes. The first definition http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/44077 Oleg.

28.09.2015 11:45, Irina Nikulina:

Paul and Tim Stratford - specialist lepidopterist? Or, as an amateur photographer? In his albums Dysphania militaris it looks quite different https://www.flickr.com/photos/beautiful_bugs/10887770244/in/album-72157644450043429/ All Dysphania the region http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini /gallery.php

28.09.2015 11:17, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you! Hence, the right conclusions from the article. Dim, take the time - and the keys lay out and describe the types of details to add.

28.09.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov:

According to another photo of the same individual.

28.09.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.09.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.09.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov:

We put the definition of the author Oleg?

28.09.2015 10:39, Peter Khramov:

Contacted Vadim Zolotukhin, he replied that it Actias artemis.

28.09.2015 9:17, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

28.09.2015 8:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I read a review of the Zoological site - really enjoyed the view of the author --- principled position of the author: "Key to the fans need, not specialists." The book is intended primarily to specialists. Amateur determination, according to ML It can often be harmful to science. He cites an example: "...of the three species of the genus Cortodera, mentioned in the inventory of the Samara region, no one even comes close to this area is not suitable, and live there for four very different! ". ----
Remove the site, fans))) your definition harmful to science)))

28.09.2015 8:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If the keys are laid out clear razobralas-

28.09.2015 7:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Overriding type: Pavel Morozov (molbiol.ru)

28.09.2015 7:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Overriding type: Pavel Morozov (molbiol.ru)

28.09.2015 7:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Overriding type: Pavel Morozov (molbiol.ru)

28.09.2015 7:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Overriding type: Pavel Morozov (molbiol.ru)

28.09.2015 7:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Overriding type: Pavel Morozov (molbiol.ru)

28.09.2015 7:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Overriding type: Pavel Morozov (molbiol.ru)

28.09.2015 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pterostoma sinicum Pterostoma gigantina.

28.09.2015 6:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pterostoma sinicum Pterostoma gigantina.

28.09.2015 6:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pterostoma sinicum Pterostoma gigantina.

28.09.2015 6:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pterostoma sinicum Pterostoma gigantina.

28.09.2015 6:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pterostoma sinicum Pterostoma gigantina.

28.09.2015 6:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pterostoma sinicum Pterostoma gigantina.

28.09.2015 5:41, Evgeny Komarov:

We spoke with Irina and these neponyatki found. Wael! Bring your it all to gigantinum. I'm your photo also determined on the basis of blue. Then Paul on Molbiole redefined. And I simply forgot to correct here!

28.09.2015 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, let's fewer exclamation marks.
I "for bought-in and then sell."
I will try, of course is to find out when I have time to do it (now I'm not up to it).
"Key to insects DV" year of publication?
And the list Sinev 2008 and updates are foreseen.A Entomology goes on :)
Paul, a recognized expert on Corydalis and if he wrote - that means that there is a reason.

28.09.2015 2:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil ! Pliz clarify why P. Morozov decided that Pterostoma sinicum Russia does not? In the Russian Far East to the insects Volume 5, ch. 3. p. 565 clearly states that there is. More specifically, it is the Khabarovsk Territory, the Amur region. and Primorye. Is this kind, and our neighbors-Japan, Korea Peninsula, S. Center. and B. China. With Primorye bordering Northeast China.Because feed is the Salix spp and Maackia amurensis, full -which in Primorye. Ie all the conditions for the existence of this species in the country is. And in the blue it is, here they write.

28.09.2015 1:37, Irina Nikulina:

Dim, I first of others. Sources, including "Keys to the insects DDA", v.5, p.2 understand, there is difference between the two types of given shape / size of holes in the HCC. But just answer me), today still made it to the article and not in vain.Detailed description of the type 3, living in the RFE and given the keys to their definitions in appearance, figures and good eyes to LC and PC are separate.All of my summer Anisimovka and Tiger, which is considered artemis, appeared sjoqvisti) But this male I ask just in case Alexander see after reading the article again doubts on two grounds clean Artemis. But some times confused, yet not made public. Actually, you should probably would add descriptions, and differences in the types of pages.

27.09.2015 23:56, Fedor Ovechkin:

Probergrothius Kirkaldy, 1904
Probergrothius nigricornis (Stål, 1861).
http://www.farangsgonewild.com/probergrothius-nigricornis.html

27.09.2015 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

27.09.2015 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it is exactly: overlooked yesterday. Bear this mute swan))

27.09.2015 22:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

in my opinion it is a male.

27.09.2015 22:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Irina. Hi! The article is, but I did not penetrate - not my team))) If you say that you understand, I fully trust you

27.09.2015 21:43, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you Paul! With regard to this species were highly questionable. Let me explain why put the form P. sinicum. Initially, based on http://www.jpmoth.org/Notodontidae/Pterostoma_gigantinum.html gallery and P. Morozov topic Notodontidae on molbiole uniquely defined as Pterostoma gigantimum . But before you put usually Sinev look into what kinds of 40 registration and check everything.So, according to the Russian Federation Sinev inhabit 3 types Pterostoma - palpina, grisea and sinicum, 40 reg - 2 last. This is what baffled, but not completely) The last argument in favor of sinicum was the fact that last year's photo Eugene Komarov http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/39620, which was determined to molbiole Paul as P. gigantimum (http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=184446&view=findpost&p=1500576), we should at P. sinicum.I decided that there were again some taxonomic changes and we must trust Sinev.

27.09.2015 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Determination confirmed by Pavel Morozov.

27.09.2015 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula furcula sangaica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.09.2015 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Determination confirmed by Pavel Morozov.

27.09.2015 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula furcula sangaica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.09.2015 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sep 25, Pavel Morozov, view the entire gallery seaside hohlatok set Irina. With regard to this kind of mail he sent me a note that in our country there is no kind of P. sinicum and it Pterostoma gigantinum. All other definitions he confirmed.

27.09.2015 20:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Meloe / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.09.2015 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Meloe / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.09.2015 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Agrypnus agrillaceus.

27.09.2015 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Agrypnus agrillaceus.

27.09.2015 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let it be for now and until better times.

27.09.2015 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera Lepturini.

27.09.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Podabrus dilaticollis.

27.09.2015 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Carabus billbergi.

27.09.2015 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Carabus venustus.

27.09.2015 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Meloe variegatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.09.2015 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Meloe variegatus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.09.2015 13:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

27.09.2015 13:57, Peter Khramov:

I recall that the banner can be removed through the LC or simply clicking Close in its upper right corner.

27.09.2015 13:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

The tribe is transferred?

27.09.2015 10:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Agrypnus agrillaceus (Solsky, 1871)

27.09.2015 10:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Carabus billbergi Mannerheim, 1827

27.09.2015 10:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Carabus venustus A. Morawitz, 1862

27.09.2015 9:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Podabrus dilaticollis Motschulsky, 1860

27.09.2015 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I wrote about how to make everything intelligible form download, universal for all orders of insects.
There must be a reserve of jackdaws
And these crows are put in depending on what kind of picture is loaded.
Loads butterfly: put down some crows.
Loads beetle: put down the other jackdaws.Here is a typical example, when the beetle, no, another jackdaw besides "Side view" does not fit:
Male; http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43510
Female: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/44192
And here is an example of when you have to put the "Front" :
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42794
It is in this perspective, you can see the unique, downward mandibles of this beetle.The same view is very important for Krawczyk (born Lethrus) / On mandibles male species and there are often different (mandibles also directed downwards).

26.09.2015 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Basil, look my comment above about the differences between butterflies from the rest.

26.09.2015 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I sketched out his version of a universal download.
It must be at least 7 jackdaws:
1) "Top view" , or simply "Top"
2) "Bottom view" , or simply "underside"
These two rooks without there wings :)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) "Side view"
4) "Rear view"
5) "Front"
These crows may be useful in some cases.In particular, when uploading the picture beetles.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6) "The picture of nature"
7) "collector's item"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, that's all in my mind, and there is nothing to split hairs.
When downloading the user will have the choice and put down what he needed, depending on the features of the loaded image.

26.09.2015 15:26, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, if you need to edit centrally, the better, but not at once, now we need to re-open the English version of all the forces are there. If the rule decentralized manner, then just open the manual interface, and you can carry.

26.09.2015 12:08, Pavel Kirillov:

Here is a comment I received on flickr when this picture was posted as D. subrepleta "That's Dysphania militaris; subrepleta has a different pattern and more grey on the forewings."

26.09.2015 11:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, I know, even a photo of Michael there with his books there - friends went. A colleague also wanted to buy, but the toad strangled

26.09.2015 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That risked even without geography. With the rest of the ball (
Originally endemic to Madagascar. Often found in the home.
I recognized him because he kept them earlier in insectarium.
Give me a couple, and a year later they became already 100 pieces ......
Then he did not know how to get rid of this pack, which is constantly growing.Thank God that they normally live only in captivity :)

26.09.2015 5:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Gromphadorhina portentosa / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2015 3:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's right, not only to support them but themselves and pants will not stay (
A book is good. Even just wonderful. And God forbid that managed to publish the entire series)
But that's the price and quality of the publication itself left much to be desired (
By the way, the last Convention of the molbiola / seminary itself ML selling first volume: the hype was on (

26.09.2015 0:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I have already written to this topic in Carabidae mess with Superfamily taxonomy! The subfamily Harpalinae dumped everything possible and impossible. Adequate classification of ground beetles here http://carabidae.org/taxa! It must be right!

25.09.2015 23:55, Peter Khramov:

Ivan, where the question is more, unlike butterflies from all others. It's about the side. With regards to the floor - there are already differences begin comrades complete metamorphosis from fellow incomplete. Apparently, too, will have to share, yes.

25.09.2015 23:45, Ivan Tislenko:

Maybe even a stage and gender divide? For example, grasshoppers and larvae, and adults may be a ovipositor, ie to have sex.

25.09.2015 23:36, Ivan Tislenko:

On makroide I think it convenient to do - 5 options: top, bottom, side, front, rear.

25.09.2015 23:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, Basil, when will the whole kit, to support the pants stay :)

25.09.2015 23:30, Evgeny Komarov:

If it is feasible, then yes, because top and bottom of the wings of butterflies only relevant.

25.09.2015 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Part of information recently could not be displayed (see "Detailed information indicating the source"). Now everything is OK.

25.09.2015 22:22, Peter Khramov:

In general, it would be yes. But a universal option, I do not see. Bo landing, such as butterflies, side, in many cases, this will mean bottom of the wings, but views of side . Ie a dorsal / ventral and frontal / lateral unsuitable.
So, I think, have this feature to share for butterflies and nebabochek.

25.09.2015 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vida just was not here and fell in neoprene. :)

25.09.2015 22:09, Peter Khramov:

Eugene without avtopodstanovok nonche does not fit, more is not binding on the name and number.

25.09.2015 22:07, Evgeny Komarov:

In fact, we are talking about just one field - the "top bottom of the wings." When loading the representatives of groups other than Lepidoptera, better this field in its present form does not fill = stupid work. Universal for any insect would be "dorsally ventral" and add another frontally and laterally.For many groups, such perspectives are relevant in determining! Discuss?

25.09.2015 22:06, Peter Khramov:

1. And the chicken or the egg?
2. And we have a determination not only to species nonche Gallery.

25.09.2015 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And there is someone to identify them?

25.09.2015 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Apopestes indica / Oleg Pekarsky.

25.09.2015 21:54, Oleg Pekarsky:

Apopestes indica Moore, 1883

25.09.2015 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Anatoly, thanks for the comment. Fixed.

25.09.2015 21:42, Peter Khramov:

Needed.

25.09.2015 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fixed misunderstanding these things :)

25.09.2015 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cychrus aeneus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

25.09.2015 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cychrus aeneus / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

25.09.2015 20:40, Evgeny Komarov:

So these images and there is no unattached.

25.09.2015 20:38, Evgeny Komarov:

So the basis of the conventional type are not present !!!! There are many more mistakes!

25.09.2015 20:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Do not understand? And that it is not tied? Standard Cychrus aeneus aeneus Fisch., 1823 - in the title, there are factories in the field !!!

25.09.2015 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, and that the Tsihrus? It is not known?

25.09.2015 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lepidiota stigma / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.09.2015 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lepidiota stigma / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.09.2015 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lepidiota stigma / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.09.2015 18:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Indefinite cockroaches, without labels (2 pcs.) Are needed?

25.09.2015 17:38, Yuri Semejkin:

From the collection of the BPI, FEB RAS.

25.09.2015 17:32, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

It is not possible to make the first photo of the form (photos of this species on the website yet. You can offer your photo Tropinota hirta, if you have one.), Clicking the site says - "Page Not Found
Try searching for desired material, starting from the home page. "
I check with a dozen species, all the same.

25.09.2015 14:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Determination confirmed Kanyukovoy EV

25.09.2015 11:35, Maria Pozdnova:

No, it is ready to take back his words, it is not Clostera anachoreta

25.09.2015 10:28, Maria Pozdnova:

As described by K. Lampert, 2003 is similar to the gray-brown kistochnitsu Pxalera anachoreta E. (Goose tsa yellow-brown with black and yellow spots on the sides and back krasnozheltoy sideband; on the fourth and eleventh warts with black rings on each side and white spot). Here the respective species is not found, but experts could look something close ...

25.09.2015 9:41, Ivan Tislenko:

Cossus cossus Cossus cossus?

25.09.2015 9:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

This is an option. In addition, it was possible to find this kind of characteristic of Eastern Siberia. We need a professional opinion!

25.09.2015 9:19, Peter Khramov:

A Anastrangalia sequensi in the comments?

25.09.2015 9:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Fedor Ovechkin Adalia bipunctata / Ivan Tislenko.

25.09.2015 9:15, Fedor Ovechkin:

Lepturini

25.09.2015 8:53, Fedor Ovechkin:

Determination flied.

25.09.2015 7:22, Vera Volkotrub:

A subspecies of P. machaon ussuriensis Sheljuzhko, 1910

25.09.2015 7:07, Shamil Murtazin:

to top ... and so likePlebejus argyrognomon

25.09.2015 5:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Pentatoma rufipes / Igor Sakhno.

25.09.2015 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.09.2015 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.09.2015 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Fedor Ovechkin Monochamus galloprovincialis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.09.2015 5:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Fedor Ovechkin Monochamus galloprovincialis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.09.2015 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, thank you. Then I will lay these 5 types of post :)

25.09.2015 0:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio xuthus / Vera Volkotrub Papilio machaon / Eugene Karolinskiy.

25.09.2015 0:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. machaon

24.09.2015 23:12, Peter Khramov:

Gluck corrected, subgenera added.

24.09.2015 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Taphoxenus goliath / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Taphoxenus goliath / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Nebria bonellii / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Nebria bonellii / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Nebria bonellii / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Nebria kurentzovi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Nebria banksi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Laemostenus koenigi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Laemostenus koenigi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Diplous depressus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cicindela restricta / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cicindela desertorum / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cylindera obliquefasciata / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cylindera obliquefasciata / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus wulffiusi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus wulffiusi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus smaragdinus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus smaragdinus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus gossarei / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus gossarei / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus cicatricosus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus cicatricosus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus aeneolus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus aeneolus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus apschuanus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:06, Peter Khramov:

Ok, understood, Gluck see how fly - I will write.

24.09.2015 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus koenigi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus koenigi / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eulichas robusta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, yes, they simply refer to the genus. I wanted for subgenera scatter - did not happen. All five are illustrated. Now I drive in only with the types of photos.

24.09.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subgenus:
Chrysoxantha Hołyński, 2009
Xanthodema Hołyński, 2009
Chrysochroa Dejean, 1833
Which of them did not work I do not remember.
Source biolib.cz (is in the database) There is the most adequate infa on him at the moment.
Well, the slider on the subgenus put self-a.

24.09.2015 18:20, Peter Khramov:

Write what data is added to each of the lines, so I can check.
ZY And now these kinds of three subgenera are a genus? They are all out there 5 pieces.

24.09.2015 17:50, Peter Khramov:

I'll fly glitch when a large percentage of the preview is not displayed.

24.09.2015 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Exochomus semenovi.

24.09.2015 16:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Collection Przewalski, 1885. Described in 1887 as a Exochomus semenovi Weise, 1887

24.09.2015 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1031862 not get to do subgenera.
He writes: An unknown error occurred ...... contact the administrator of the site ..
That appeal: figure it out please :)
Well, clean up traces of my failed attempts at the same time.
They created three kinds of subgenera. When everything is OK - pilfered.

24.09.2015 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Udaspes folus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 13:04, Fedor Ovechkin:

About this forgotten.

24.09.2015 13:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Ivan Tislenko.

24.09.2015 12:46, Fedor Ovechkin:

Definition: Ivan Tislenko, http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43957.

24.09.2015 11:26, Irina Nikulina:

This butterfly has long rest does not) I can see whose determination, and yet suggest that there was an error in the photo male Anticypella diffusaria

24.09.2015 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Far invader (primary habitat: The Russian Far East, China, Korea), Moscow Region.
Get information about this kind of article can be MG Volkovich: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/eab_2007.htm
In 2012, and I was able to collect two copies in the heart of Moscow Region Railway.

24.09.2015 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Carabus convallium.

24.09.2015 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Carabus convallium.

24.09.2015 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Eurema / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.09.2015 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Udaspes folus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Udaspes folus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Udaspes folus / Evgeny Komarov.

24.09.2015 8:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Udaspes folus Cramer, 1775, Hesperidae.

24.09.2015 8:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Udaspes folus Cramer, 1775, Hesperidae.

24.09.2015 8:55, Peter Khramov:

Why can not tolerate?

24.09.2015 8:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Cethosia cyane euanthes / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.09.2015 8:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Udaspes folus Cramer, 1775, Hesperidae.

24.09.2015 8:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema sp

24.09.2015 8:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cethosia cyane euanthes Fruhstorfer,1912

24.09.2015 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Satchelliella sp Rod advised to look Kanyukova EV I looked and I think that kind of really Satchelliella. Overlooking slip. But like in this case, it is possible, by process of elimination to cut off all described coins. Then look relatively fresh descriptions of suitable geography. Option only one kind Satchelliella ussurica [Wagner, 1994] - only here for one thing disturbs.I could not find any pictures of this kind, nor the size of information. But most likely it is a Satchelliella ussurica [Wagner, 1994], or even a new look. Anyway, you can probably move is to Satchelliella sp.

24.09.2015 5:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Somehow I do not pay attention to the "upper part" of the tree taxa of this family, and now found that the subfamily Harpalinae dumped everything possible and impossible. Adequate classification of ground beetles here http://carabidae.org/taxa! It must be right!

24.09.2015 4:59, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Such beauty we fell on the table with a huge ficus.

24.09.2015 1:04, Irina Nikulina:

It is more convenient, do not need to scroll, thank you!

24.09.2015 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pachnoda Pachnoda sinuata.

24.09.2015 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Pachnoda sinuata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2015 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Pachnoda / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 23:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia atlites / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

23.09.2015 23:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia atlites / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

23.09.2015 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, ground beetles of the admin you'll take away or take away me later? Just in case: Zinovsky site and Carabidae of the World already have the sources. So what is to rely on)

23.09.2015 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata / Yuri Semejkin.

23.09.2015 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Was in the admin as a Dorcus titanus imperialis I will add on my own author and year: Fujita, 2010.
Better yet pobudet in the nominative: guard me new subspecies from commercial beetles.

23.09.2015 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Dorcus titanus / Igor Ivannikov.

23.09.2015 22:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Alas, just like - there is this kind in the Far East.

23.09.2015 22:01, Ivan Tislenko:

It looks like Cryptocephalus laevicollis

23.09.2015 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Chalcosoma caucasus / Igor Ivannikov.

23.09.2015 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Chalcosoma caucasus / Igor Ivannikov.

23.09.2015 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Odontolabis wollastoni / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Odontolabis wollastoni / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Odontolabis wollastoni / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 21:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Mylabris atrata Pallas, 1773

23.09.2015 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Odontolabis castelnaudi / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Capnodis excisa / Evgeny Komarov.

23.09.2015 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Calcodes aeratus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Calcodes aeratus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 21:28, Fedor Ovechkin:

ThisJunonia atlites

23.09.2015 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Adalia bipunctata / Male & female / Ivan Tislenko.

23.09.2015 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's right this time because your diocese butterflies and my still more bugs :)
But always glad amendments. , Especially about the brackets)

23.09.2015 21:17, Ivan Tislenko:

Adalia bipunctata http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/838090

23.09.2015 21:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Again the conversation deaf and the blind (

23.09.2015 20:50, Peter Khramov:

Svetlana, when loading place at least Lepidoptera, make your photos to be seen in the sample pictures just butterflies.

23.09.2015 20:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Mylabris / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mylabris variabilis / Evgeny Komarov.

23.09.2015 20:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Mylabris variabilis (Pallas, 1781). It's quite simple.

23.09.2015 20:44, Ivan Tislenko:

Looks like Meloidae trehpyatnistogo Lydus trimaculatus http://macroid.ru/showgallery.php?cat=1840

23.09.2015 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Lucanus cervus / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 20:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, we need different perspectives, Vasily rights - ideal top (if he did not know what to shoot). This 90% Lydus bimaculatus (alas, there is a similar in our area has one), but this is more common.

23.09.2015 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Lucanus cervus / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Cryptocephalus sericeus / Evgeny Komarov.

23.09.2015 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Komarov.

23.09.2015 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cryptocephalus Cryptocephalus sericeus.

23.09.2015 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bad. Fedor, beetles is better to remove the top, then the probability determination is higher)

23.09.2015 20:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Cryptocephalus sericeus (Linnaeus, 1758).

23.09.2015 20:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Cryptocephalus sericeus (Linnaeus, 1758). Options available.

23.09.2015 20:22, Fedor Ovechkin:

None of this angle. (

23.09.2015 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's why I asked about the top :)

23.09.2015 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Clytra Mylabris.

23.09.2015 20:16, Shamil Murtazin:

On top like shrimp =)

23.09.2015 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Cryptocephalus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Angle the top is not hurt

23.09.2015 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Fedor Ovechkin Clytra / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not worry I will bring everything into one when the rights are. What is not Aromia is unique.
That is the most striking example: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/foto.asp?Id=1956 (another kind of truth)
And here are collected Aroma: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/specieric.asp?Tipo=R&RIC=

23.09.2015 19:37, Ivan Tislenko:

Yeah, Fedor, like too fusca. But I'm not an expert.

23.09.2015 19:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Caloptilia stigmatella?

23.09.2015 19:22, Fedor Ovechkin:

Ivan, look, please, # 43949. Does not this look?

23.09.2015 19:05, Irina Nikulina:

With differences gnoma artemis and finally sorted out, defining captured this summer Actias. Here Actias gnoma, I think. Dmitry, what do you say? I see you're already familiar with the article.

23.09.2015 18:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Anatoly, you should always bring who and where identified butterfly. In this case, the author's comments had to be written: is defined on http://molbiol.ru Antonov Alexandr. and everything to you nor any claims :)

23.09.2015 18:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not claim that. This taxon is now present on the site as a species and a subspecies. He described as a subspecies of another sort, so the author in brackets on many sites. The site barbel, but on it he is given as a species, and the author without brackets. I was surprised, it is necessary to look the code, but you can not.

23.09.2015 17:50, Peter Khramov:

Sort unfolded in the opposite direction to newer drugs were higher, not lower, as it was before. Convenient?

23.09.2015 17:28, Peter Khramov:

Well so if there is an error, you need to edit it. Or is it not a mistake, but just the same writing?

23.09.2015 17:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, wait, why hurry.

23.09.2015 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sagra buqueti.

23.09.2015 16:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, the subspecies is not in the database. It is possible to temporarily write the top line in the same way as is done in my photo

23.09.2015 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lucanus maculifemoratus.

23.09.2015 16:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Mormolyce phyllodes / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Lucanus maculifemoratus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Lucanus maculifemoratus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Lucanus maculifemoratus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lucanus laetus.

23.09.2015 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In general, the network is full of blunders spinning. I do not want to repeat them here :)
In fact, even visually nothing to do with aromatherapy))

23.09.2015 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Imago / Robot Gastropacha quercifolia / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2015 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aiolocaria hexaspilota / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub.

23.09.2015 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aiolocaria hexaspilota / Confidently identified / Vera Volkotrub.

23.09.2015 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

On many sites, and here. See below.

23.09.2015 15:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Gandaritis fixseni / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2015 15:54, Peter Khramov:

It is somewhere there is a subspecies in the database or just the insects in the world?

23.09.2015 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

As described subspecies in the genus Aromia. I do not get distracted, to understand.

23.09.2015 15:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

I've kind of said, no problem http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1031825
Still a lot of things should be there and to combine and rank changed. I am waiting for a complete set of tools and add slowly. :)

23.09.2015 15:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarmydus antennatus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 15:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Osmoderma barnabita / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 15:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Osmoderma barnabita / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 15:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Live them to the cultural breeding to get)))

23.09.2015 15:26, Peter Khramov:

With subspecies - do. Supervision - there are now only a limited (adding taxa without editing). One of these days I will fulfill. Alexander, you seem to be saying that something must be added to the butterflies - Add it now pliz and confirmed that all the rules work.

23.09.2015 15:24, Peter Khramov:

I think weeks and a half or two.

23.09.2015 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, Alexander: it is a separate species, and is written without parentheses: http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/rufiventris-Gressitt-1940
Resource Cerambycidae of the World http://cerambycidae.org/ currently the most adequate for Usachev AI therefore rely on it in such matters.
Exactly the same as the Carabidae of the World http://carabidae.org/ most adequate for ground beetles.
These are two parallel life :)

23.09.2015 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, when I'm in charge of my group will brace and everything else :)
Today created a branch of the tribe to look and there was a kind of zavedёn with parentheses, as it should be: http://cerambycidae.org/taxa/wallichi-(Hope-1831) (one of the most adequate resources for barbel).
Then view the genus have been removed since the curatorship yet.There was one in which the tribe and then shove this genus with species from the wrong place where he is originally from the corresponding edition.
Then these mistakes fully and certainly they should be correct, but it's a matter of time :)
I fully support your zamechanienie about working with subtypes. It is really necessary.

23.09.2015 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Meganola strigula / Yuri Semejkin.

23.09.2015 14:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

When?

23.09.2015 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Autographa gamma / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Miltochrista miniata / Yuri Semejkin.

23.09.2015 14:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Small exclusive.

23.09.2015 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Vera Volkotrub Abraxas grossulariata / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2015 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

It seems clear from the curatorship is not clear from the taxa. A subspecies of the taxon if he has that kind of build do not have to? But the curators do not have the opportunity to work with the subspecies. Another looked at the beetle,
I think not too zamarachivatsya brace authors, if they need to be. And delivery is also necessary to look authorship is not always spelled out.

23.09.2015 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diastocera wallichi tricincta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 14:13, Peter Khramov:

There are doubts - voiced.

23.09.2015 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

He really hanging subspecies have Aphrodisium faldermannii Saunders, 1853. The following synonyms are no synonym only spellings and spelling mistakes :) I realized that it was because cerambycidae.org. And I think at the beetles are not too zamarachivatsya brace authors. This species should be like brackets.

23.09.2015 14:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Scopula emissaria / Fedor Ovechkin.

23.09.2015 14:05, Peter Khramov:

Basil now call the phone number and explain how to do it right.
All: I remind you that we should not add new taxa to replace the old. We need to change the old to the new. But if the taxon is not based at all - then and only then to add.
ZY Now I'm hooked dobavlyalku only a couple of days to connect and editing.

23.09.2015 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I tried to create from the tribe and to species descending. Everything works fine.
Peter, that this page: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/167920 to be removed by shifting it to the newly created sub-species in a right direction of the form page here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1031832
This system is now, I tried :)

23.09.2015 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Eugene: do you the ability to add taxa of beetles.
All: I pay attention to change the mode of access to the adding and updating of taxa.In Lepidoptera were as follows:
butterflies can add all members of the admin group (those who have access to the system area), and edit taxa (transfer from parent to parent, rename, etc.) could only curators and me.In connection with the expansion of the database are now propose to do so:
adding new taxa can supervisors with limited rights, and editing - only curators experts. For example, people will be able to add all kinds of butterflies, but edit only those taxa that are Papilionidae.
Do you agree?

23.09.2015 13:54, Fedor Ovechkin:

In this photo there is doubt?

23.09.2015 13:52, Irina Nikulina:

Realized soon, thank you)) But is not removed .. Peter, by the way, just took less than half an hour)

23.09.2015 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now everything works (kind of tried to add). I and taxa above all should be well.

23.09.2015 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphrodisium rufiventris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2015 13:21, Peter Khramov:

Yes, that species of butterflies in the database, not illustrated species of butterflies.

23.09.2015 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I mentioned a copy of the Moscow region, which was assembled in front of me, a year before the two depicted in the neighborhood and a completely different point.
In general, the appearance of the Italian locust and migratory locust: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/497589 in my region - a unique phenomenon :)

23.09.2015 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Il taxa rather than a photo. :)

23.09.2015 12:54, Evgeny Komarov:

OK! This is realized. Peter! Why can not I add a subgenus of the system? I wanted a little bit with their ground beetles clean up, There's a kind of Palaearctic subgenus Carabus heap (not to mention the kinds of) no. I would quietly led the family in order in the amount of Palaearctic - a group of "native".

23.09.2015 12:41, Irina Nikulina:

How is it, Peter?) In November 5000th Congratulations, now showing 5641 ... And really how much?

23.09.2015 12:24, Peter Khramov:

By the way, after all the new things on the species of butterflies online was 2 times more than it was in the Lepidoptera.

23.09.2015 12:09, Peter Khramov:

Basil, try it now again, everything should be OK.
Eugene, on the debris in the gallery - support of Alexander. And on this particular fote I wrote to Theodore comments, later removed.

23.09.2015 12:05, Peter Khramov:

Naturalist will appreciate the opening of a separate specialty store for users Insekta.pro.

23.09.2015 11:59, Fedor Ovechkin:

So we wait.

23.09.2015 11:55, Irina Nikulina:

Fedor, it is impossible. Peter knows the problem, but its solution is not easy, takes time in the near future he will do that, I do not think that should remove the name of the subspecies, let's just wait and as soon as the problem comes off, fast forward everything in place. Such statement to the subspecies accumulated all at checkout.

23.09.2015 11:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Found all over collection- photographer's name. Everything works.

23.09.2015 11:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is a pity that you do not remember - even though the definition of view. In February, I will go there again)))

23.09.2015 11:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

flies were no more than 5 cm. In general, I thought at first cockroach.

23.09.2015 11:16, Fedor Ovechkin:

Is it possible to view these photos illustrate? Perhaps, at least for a time, until the problem is solved, transfer of the subspecies to the species? In addition there is a double of the photo - # 42352, would like to remove it.

23.09.2015 11:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene photos can delete only Peter, and he does it very reluctantly. What you wrote is necessary to write the pages of photos that the author had seen his photo fufel us and this quality is not necessary.

23.09.2015 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Borneo has Mormolyce borneensis Gestro, 1875
And my big enough. Length This copies. 8 centimeters

23.09.2015 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, not three. And everything is online. Just all the links do not remember (

23.09.2015 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you for being noticed today I will add, sorry. Just see if worn out (
And copies. of Defense today I sfotayu and lay out here. It's really very interesting findings of its geography)

23.09.2015 10:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Did I just 3 barbel peredovat? Or am I on the site can see only three

23.09.2015 10:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In Borneo, once flew to the light, is not large

23.09.2015 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I'm talking about the fact that no country, no region. :)
All certainly know where you are going to, but it's also a few areas, it is better to specify.

23.09.2015 10:32, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues, not to "litter" gallery, let the pictures here are immediately removed Photo # 43869: Carabidae sp. (there are two of them are almost the same and no quality). As a specialist in ground beetles just say that the definition of such "pictures" do not give in!

23.09.2015 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course. Personally I am going :)
There is discussed: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=267019&view=findpost&p=1418793
P.S. I and a copy of the Ministry of Defense is already present in 2012, which was not about me, but I (with the man then drove).

23.09.2015 10:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Geography with labels?

23.09.2015 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, thank you for being noticed. I just made a mistake when loading.
That photo was replaced, and now there are locusts: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43356
And then the locust as intended :)

23.09.2015 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's hard, but they are few. On the peninsula from the words of this very common collector.

23.09.2015 9:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nearing closing of the hunting season and the start of the season unfolding))) What is it we want to please the naturalist?

23.09.2015 9:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By the way, in this kind of different kinds?

23.09.2015 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, a relative of the well-known Colorado potato beetle :)

23.09.2015 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mormolyce phyllodes Hagenbach, 1825
And this is a bug in Russian "beetle-listovidka" or "Zhuk-violin"
The English version of "Violin beetle" or "Guitar Beetle"
In general, the beetles are often found amazing shapes :))

23.09.2015 9:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

"Frog-legged leaf beetle" - lyagushkonogy leaf beetle

23.09.2015 9:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

the same photo with Locusta migratoria

23.09.2015 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you )))

23.09.2015 8:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That's the way http://www.zin.ru/animalia/Coleoptera/pdf/borneo_catalog_electronic_version_2005-1.pdf

23.09.2015 8:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It was necessary this year to give you usatikov, but I Zapara

23.09.2015 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is difficult with this case, alas (((
Dmitri, the barbel you passed through Peter, I identified and they all already have on the site.

23.09.2015 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Odontolabis wollastoni Parry, 1864

23.09.2015 8:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A check on the lists have Usachev Borneo?

23.09.2015 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Calcodes aeratus (Hope, 1835)

23.09.2015 7:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sarmydas antennatus Pascoe, 1867
I want to thank Dmitry for Pozhogin stuff :)))
With the definition of barbel I suffer capitally until get to the truth ....
By the way, "almighty" Google finds almost nothing of this kind, except that here: http://plant.cdfa.ca.gov/byciddb/wdetails.asp?id=16495&w=o and links to molbiol where I posted this beetle earlier)

23.09.2015 6:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, on this bug, be sure to add to the page 2 of the form established, colloquial name :)
Russian version: "Beetle - Frog"
English version: "Frog-legged leaf beetle"
Here it is shown yet another embodiment names beetle, which is depicted in the photo: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php? showtopic = 84088 & view = findpost & p = 368656
And the question is certainly interesting: the Latin names can negotiate indefinitely.
On this subject can be read on the link that I gave :))

23.09.2015 6:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not create views. Made by the same system as before.
1) I enter the name of the species.
2) was added (using autosubstitution) source.
3) Press
But nothing happens - the form is not added (

23.09.2015 6:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Speaking of speaking names =)
http://jugan.org/perd.html

23.09.2015 5:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, Peter, thank you)
Today and try.

22.09.2015 23:36, Peter Khramov:

I propose to rename beetle frog. In general, krosavets course.

22.09.2015 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Finish adding taxa. Basil, as For you this stuff is new, the first to test a one-two taxa, and then if everything is OK, walking on the volume.
Adding goes through the kind of page / subgenus above. Detailed instructions - in these very pages at the bottom.

22.09.2015 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Fedor Ovechkin Chlorophorus varius / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Fedor Ovechkin Chlorophorus varius / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah.
With these legs he is called in the people Beetle - Frog :)

22.09.2015 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Bloomers - envy.

22.09.2015 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wait seem necessary. In the control group. I'll try again later.

22.09.2015 21:37, Fedor Ovechkin:

Again flied definition.

22.09.2015 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sagra buqueti (Lesson, 1831)

22.09.2015 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, I forgot to put down banal.

22.09.2015 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Fedor Ovechkin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 20:49, Irina Nikulina:

Interesting copy! Ure, until you have the night, I was engaged in excavation) Well, nevertheless, considered, I think it is June 17th 1901. And it seems that it charges from Japan. If this is Peter Schmidt, just in 1899, he first went to the Far East as the head of the Korean-Sakhalin expedition.In late summer 1900 he made an expedition to the land of Korea Wonsan to Pusan. A 1901g.byl in Japan and Sakhalin. And the name of geogr. Hatusi point indicated on the label - as something very Japanese) But as the assumption, of course.

22.09.2015 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Monochamus sutor / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerambycidae / Imago / Fedor Ovechkin Monochamus sutor / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, thanks for the tip. The thing is, I could not find the form of a while ago and threw the admin panel.

22.09.2015 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Ditylus laevis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Ditylus laevis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, type in the directory is there, the question mark you have not, why can not tolerate? )

22.09.2015 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coccinellidae / Fedor Ovechkin Coccinella septempunctata / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.09.2015 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ditylus laevis (Fabricius, 1787)

22.09.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lucanus maculifemoratus dybowskyi Parry, 1862

22.09.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lucanus maculifemoratus dybowskyi Parry, 1862

22.09.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lucanus maculifemoratus dybowskyi Parry, 1862

22.09.2015 18:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes label shot with pins and photographed. But there's not much will deal.

22.09.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The label was removed from the pin?
It did not stop there-to the data.

22.09.2015 18:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Steep twisted Ira Nikulina this label, but failed to understand the geography. Collection Date June 17, a year .. In the year given the last 2 digits. Whether 81, or 01.

22.09.2015 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This image shows the main difference between this bronzovok from all other beetles.
Chafer can fly without revealing the elytra, but in order to be able to fly like them and the edges of the elytra arranged special, different from other beetles way by which they "know how" to produce the wings between the elytra and abdomen.

22.09.2015 17:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2015 16:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Brachinus crepitans.

22.09.2015 16:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene ! I can not see the abdomen. The sample is attached firmly, apparently with glue?

22.09.2015 16:24, Yuri Semejkin:

I found outside the collector, in one of the cabinets. The label nadpis.Brachynus cropitans. But somehow the impression that already back in 1962 it was written from memory here mistake. It probably is about Brachinus crepitans (Linnaeus, 1758).

22.09.2015 16:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Naturally crepitans. If the abdomen (sternites) dark brown, it accurately.

22.09.2015 14:26, Evgeny Komarov:

It is necessary to clearly lay out!

22.09.2015 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus arcensis / Evgeny Komarov.

22.09.2015 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus arcensis / Evgeny Komarov.

22.09.2015 13:17, Peter Khramov:

Basil did tonight or tomorrow.

22.09.2015 13:17, Peter Khramov:

Stop decadent mood!
Dim, out here and do not hesitate.

22.09.2015 13:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Dmitriy ! If ZIN-then there opredelyat.Esli here who will be watching? Alternatively, in certain ZIN, then fold here.

22.09.2015 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acherontia atropos / Yuri Semejkin Acherontia lachesis / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2015 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acherontia atropos / Yuri Semejkin Acherontia lachesis / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2015 13:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Fold I'm not going anywhere))) Meant whether they Fota (one course) and spread on the site?

22.09.2015 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter rassharivat adding taxa. It has matured a vital necessity.
Every day overgrown with certain types of beetles that require transfer.
Sources in the database is: part of you said, at my request, and I was part of.
It is only for small - to be able to add taxa :)

22.09.2015 12:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Looked and top and underside. I agree that this Acherontia lachesis. Carry.

22.09.2015 12:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, you're probably right. I it did not even look. I was told on the go, it's a dead head, I wrote. The label is not preserved. Here on the site there is no label, so I took off. You can remove, since it is not necessary.

22.09.2015 12:25, Peter Khramov:

I have long connected Skype yesterday, but still worked. However, Alexander again only next week will be on the computer, so next week.

22.09.2015 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is not just seen and A. lachesis is likely))).
One reason about said labels.

22.09.2015 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.09.2015 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.09.2015 12:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, and that's exactly Acherontia atropos? I see Acherontia lachesis.

22.09.2015 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, really there is no label?

22.09.2015 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus arcensis / Evgeny Komarov.

22.09.2015 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Carabus arcensis / Evgeny Komarov.

22.09.2015 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK

22.09.2015 11:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Well Zina he really arcensis, endure! While here http://carabidae.org/taxa/arvensis-arvensis-herbst-1784 vice versa, but will rely on ZIN.

22.09.2015 10:03, Yuri Semejkin:

If reset here http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/fotorule.htm not a bunch, and captured one, yes.

22.09.2015 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, I think that in view of the basis is, as Carabus arcensis (such as synonyms).
Move or will it not true? Not because karabidolog asking :)

22.09.2015 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Confidently identified Ligyra oenomaus / Tentatively identified.

22.09.2015 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bombyliidae / Confidently identified Ligyra oenomaus / Tentatively identified.

22.09.2015 8:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I beetles are not strong at all. Just I have not seen this before. Or paid attention. And then there came the sea of ​​the screen))) I took one just in case. Plus some 20 mm black long-horned beetles were flying, but those were 5-7 pcs per night.

22.09.2015 7:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

Ligyra oenomaus, certain inaccuracies.

22.09.2015 7:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

Ligyra oenomaus, certain inaccuracies.

22.09.2015 6:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, but I also look everything is normal. So do not fly off :)

22.09.2015 5:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, like all of a place to stay yet!

22.09.2015 4:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Mermitelocerus annulipes Reuter, 1908. identified the Kanyukova EV FEFU Zoological Museum (Vladivostok).

22.09.2015 3:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Usingerida verrucigera (Bergroth, 1892)

22.09.2015 3:39, Vera Volkotrub:

Paratachycines boldyrevi.

22.09.2015 1:37, Shamil Murtazin:

An interesting realization of line - program. You can add a check mark in the profile settings, or leave the switch next to the photo.
(http://alsphotopage.com/image/show/id/10270)

21.09.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, I was able to move it into place. However strange it all: Watch and Alexander tried, but it did not happen. It is interesting to fly off decision or not?

21.09.2015 23:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Omophron limbatum / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.09.2015 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Carabus (Microplectes) convallium Starck, 1889

21.09.2015 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Carabus (Microplectes) convallium Starck, 1889

21.09.2015 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm actually going to oversee one family - Cerambycidae because doing them a long time, I know it at the level far above average even though I do not have specific biological education. This family I have enough to last a lifetime because of its abundance, it is one-tenth of the size of the detachment Lepidoptera.The rest of the beetles take as long as the site is not there will be people who have more expertise in this matter.
Eugene, I could easily oversee the Carabidae. The only question is:-wants it?
But with people I did not just meet they with me often and the Council, given my experience and not calling at the same time an amateur.Concerning the rules for filling in geography if my collection, I will fill it as it should be with all the necessary details.
If you collect something someone else bring the label to the original as possible giving explanations.Geographic label (its text), a necessary part of the insect without which the insect is not a wrapper and is absolutely no scientific value. You should not put on a number of photos of nature and collectible copies. it is absolutely different things.
Well, almost all said that they want. Absolutely I do not want any one "throw rags."Alexander, and you fasten with this business. It does not lead to good.
Regarding Skype. Today he is in the morning around the world: http://www.riasv.ru/entry/198044/
And still is not working. Therefore, due to the near future is foreseen. Please then. Now it's really necessary.

21.09.2015 22:18, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, here I am found. Type in the base is there, but the selection is not activated at startup. As a result, the photo appears in Omophron limbatum uncertain: Photo # 43765. As mentioned above - to upload a photo from the page of the form is impossible.

21.09.2015 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Omophron limbatum / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

21.09.2015 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Argynnis / Artem Strizhov Argynnis aglaja / Irina Nikulina.

21.09.2015 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Argynnis / Artem Strizhov Argynnis aglaja / Irina Nikulina.

21.09.2015 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.09.2015 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna congrua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.09.2015 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Mythimna congrua / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.09.2015 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Mythimna congrua / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.09.2015 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Mythimna congrua / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.09.2015 22:08, Irina Nikulina:

Argynnis aglaja, I think.

21.09.2015 21:54, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, why not now upload a picture to the bugs directly from the pages of the form, if there is not one picture? If the pictures are already there, everything is OK, but if you do not have pictures, you get this: "Page http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/%3C?=$UserLang?%3E/usercab/userupload/?userupload=[959081]%20Cicindela%20albissima Found Try searching for desired material, starting from the home page of the site. "If you go from the "Download site" followed by the selection of species, all turns out, but it is not good.

21.09.2015 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Argynnis / Artem Strizhov.

21.09.2015 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Argynnis / Artem Strizhov.

21.09.2015 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, not in DVArgynnis adippe

21.09.2015 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Basil, I'm talking about your general biological literacy and on beetles hard for me to judge, I'm not interested in them at all, if you're going, you just know. About observation of nature already read about Apollo. Meeting with experts, does not make you a specialist, and read literature scholar. Yes, this is my personal opinion.:)
Basil, you are the master of his word. Sam gave himself takin. You several times to change their statements. If you said to do something, that said, if you do not do something, and do not say. You are very active and hard-working people, really have a large collection, you know a lot of species, put a lot of photos (about the quality will not speak, there is good).But a lot of the unknown, and you know you do not want all of the tops. But all may learn, as it should. comments are not tolerated, and if agree it is a great favor, and everyone should be grateful to you that you changed something, I promised not to change. I have already said many times.
Yes, Peter, it is necessary to talk on Skype.Because the site has grown to an incredible potential size, and to my great regret, we can not close our eyes to those taxa that I personally do not interesting, because there are beginning to introduce their own rules, as it was not just on Lepidoptera and preached as the truth of last resort. And all need to do so.Poor Peter, there is no strict rules for the filling site, when there tends to be easier to produce a common denominator. And for every little need to explain and receive the answer "I myself know how." We can all make mistakes, we all only a certain amount of knowledge. But you can not deny anything that is not yours, if you do not know him.This week the conversation will not work, at least on Sunday, even better at the beginning of next week. I will be on the site only with the phone. :(

21.09.2015 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.09.2015 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.09.2015 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Eugene :)

21.09.2015 19:36, Artem Strizhov:

Argynnis adippe

21.09.2015 19:12, Peter Khramov:

While few people with curated pretty simple, more choice quite simple: here and now beetles can supervise or Basil or nobody. I believe that Basil, as curator, the situation with the beetles on the site will improve rather than worsen.If there are other curators in this taxon, then we can discuss who in some beetles more knowledge to distribute powers, etc. I am sure that he will not Vasily against it. Actually, it concerns all taxa - supervision must not be frozen once and for all, life goes on, things change.With a good scenario, the number of supervisors must increase, but their specialization - to rise.
In all of this, I understand your concerns, Alexander.
And for the umpteenth time, let us again skonnektim on Skype for three. No end or edge Well this all can not see otherwise ...

21.09.2015 19:06, Peter Khramov:

On removal of the photo out of the question. And in the case - I agree Alexander option is the most reasonable.

21.09.2015 18:57, Evgeny Komarov:

The female you :)

21.09.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The original match. While preparing a photo of his Beetle, Eugene has uploaded a series)))
Eugene, I, too, I have a male?
Genus Carabus in most cases easy to distinguish on the front paws, but with Calosoma space (

21.09.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Athous haemorrhoidalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.09.2015 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Athous haemorrhoidalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.09.2015 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mylabris quadripunctata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.09.2015 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mylabris quadripunctata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.09.2015 17:00, Ivan Tislenko:

Yeah, already I looked. Thank you, Irina! With the rapid expansion of the site - from butterflies to all insects work, you will be added.

21.09.2015 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

There was an extra space after the species name. :)

21.09.2015 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cylindera arenaria / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

21.09.2015 16:46, Igor Sakhno:

For some reason it does not want to ride in Cylindera arenaria

21.09.2015 16:44, Irina Nikulina:

I did not need to validate the definition, I saw a page of Ivan in Zina. The question was in another, and forgive me, that was not included in a large group of knowledgeable features of this type of people. Photos delivered, Ivan.

21.09.2015 16:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I confirmed and I hope my confirmation will be enough. This kind of know almost all people who have at-least superficial approach to the beetles in particular due to its intraspecific variation.
A truly professional with a capital of ladybirds Ukrainian Andrei died in Moscow just over a year ago: http: //www.zin.ru / Animalia / Coleoptera / rus / as_ukrop.htm
The bright memory of him ...
Forgive me, Lord, for what is necessary to remember him for the second time on the day of ((

21.09.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

21.09.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

21.09.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

21.09.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

21.09.2015 16:23, Ivan Tislenko:

Ah, now I realized. I'm not an expert, but that ladybugs are two main forms - red and black (not sexual dimorphism). I'm new here - I understand that in the description page of the form there are two photos - then can one black and one red. Red, like, more common, so we can deliver basic red.

21.09.2015 15:57, Irina Nikulina:

Ivan, photos at the species description pages does not appear automatically, manually set the two men - either Peter or me. And we do it occasionally when I have time free from primary activity) So "3 hours after loading" play no role.I did this morning has illustrated all kinds of wonderful photos of your cows, but one species of which you are writing. There are different pictures.I'm not an expert in Coccinellidae and decided later, when there will be time to ask you about them - what better illustrate the type of photo? This variability or as sexual dimorphism?Here I ask) and will not worry if illustration pages species is delayed, it is due only to the presence of Peter I and the time available for the site. I try to do it every day. But with the transition to the site insecta.pro work on illustrating increased significantly - in the morning has illustrated 16 species, and now has come - and still hang in the LC 12)

21.09.2015 15:05, Ivan Tislenko:

Upload photos morning cows. All is normal, while the two-point ladybugs on the description page http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/838090 photos do not appear (on the right side there is a photo). When searching for the specified herewith. Coccinellidae marked "Only species with the photo" shows all ladybugs than this. 3 hours after the load has already passed.

21.09.2015 15:01, Yuri Semejkin:

It's my typo. Fixed.

21.09.2015 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apparently Andrew (of blessed memory) sealed.
She actually Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata (Motschulsky, 1857)
Definition of human trust and, therefore, as will the ability to bear.

21.09.2015 14:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Henosepilachna vigintioctomaculata Identified Andrew Ukrainian ZIN

21.09.2015 12:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nizhny Novgorod region. Bor District,. Syrohvatovo

21.09.2015 12:55, Evgeny Komarov:

In the middle zone is common. In the Lower Volga is local, but if there are a lot.

21.09.2015 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something too late for him. Where exactly?

21.09.2015 12:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This weekend plaguing them was not. We flew to light many tyschschi)))

21.09.2015 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, Lafer as a specialist knows and remembers the world zhuchistov. The bright memory of him: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/lafer.htm
Personally I do not intersect, but do not know this man as an outstanding coleopterology none "zhuchist" can not afford.
Referring'll be glad to help if naroyu something worthwhile for DV.

21.09.2015 11:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil! Not being spices, and based on that understanding, even with a detachment of his region did not quite prosto.teh few bugs that I come across, I will send to the definition in ZIN. Earlier in BPI, something that I was looking Lafer (while he was alive), maybe you had to meet Zinovsky infe that name.For reference, thank you, maybe that will fit where.

21.09.2015 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Often we found on aspen and poplar logs from mid-May to June-July. Not rare, and in the cities directly. Good flies to light.
Around the first of May, you can pick the bark of fallen the year before aspens and poplars on the subject of the search moves and pupae in them (easily derived from them in captivity).From egg to adult develops year and populates mostly svezhepovalennye trees.
This is based on my personal observations in the area.
Dmitry, I shall add: the same situation with the occurrence and characteristics of living species in Srgievo Posad district of Moscow and Petushki district of Vladimir region.So it is supposed to be and have.

21.09.2015 11:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How often have found the beast (the question to experts beetles)?

21.09.2015 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, this German site is just one of many that are not worth paying attention. I know him for a long time and had already ceased to go there because, like in my case there is in the dead center Presenting a minimum species, etc. I stalled it in my opinion.
Here are two resources on beetles that develop much more quickly and dynamically.True, they are devoted only to individual families:
By Usachev: http://cerambycidae.org/
By ground beetles: http://carabidae.org/
Coupled with Zinovsky site (it's off. RAS site and there are many people who really suffer for the cause), and these resources should be used.
In more good barbel this website: http: //www.cerambycoidea.com /
True to its classification can not be used (infa there at the moment is obsolete).
But good use gallery to determine (species determination right there) and relying on him to add information on the distribution.

21.09.2015 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aeksandr, though nothing personal, but let me ask one question.You have my experience and knowledge on beetles, accumulated over many years of working with the material, communication with many "zhuchistami" and observation of nature + literature is read a ton about beetles and butterflies are not ???
I believe that you should not judge people on the basis of their own, purely personal opinion.Do not want my kanditatura - let the bugs on it engaged Alexander Zhakov.
And I will ask you to have everything on the mind as the beetles I love and a passion for him especially.
Are not met my requests - walk the site forest and shallow tread.
The conversation here is short.
Also - nothing personal.Just in those cases when the roll barrels per person instead offered another kanditatura and preferably their own.
This is to ensure that people do not think badly about the person who rolls the barrel.
I stop: I am afraid I will burst eventually.
Damn, rather than to deal with the case have already reached people's opinions.Soon, I really feel is not on the road with this website.

21.09.2015 7:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, think about it, the man who is poorly understood structure and site assignment, and individual columns. Fixated on the correctness and exclusivity. The concept of science, replacing its trappings, without understanding their meaning. And overseeing the largest order of insects? Yes Vasily there such bells and whistles that will then correct the whole brigade.And any comments and criticism will be rejected on the grounds "I am the curator, I know better." Yesterday's discussion showed. A man who himself does wrong, he also taught others to do wrong.The problem with the curatorship will be greater need for new taxa, "measure seven times and cut one" rather than a lack of information from the first amateur site. We need a serious book knowledge and not a superficial knowledge of the collector. Alas or anything personal.

21.09.2015 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In order to finally close the issue did as I advised Aleksand Belousov in his post by 20.09.2015 16:09 .
So, really, "the wolves are fed and the sheep are safe."
In fact, I really do not want that for this reason, were removed from this unique photo copies.

21.09.2015 6:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.09.2015 6:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.09.2015 6:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calinaga davidis / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

21.09.2015 6:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

NB. This bug corrected on its own.
Still wondering why it happened.

21.09.2015 6:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #43639 group.

21.09.2015 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

21.09.2015 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

21.09.2015 6:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And my Beetle, and the group I was with anyone they do not knit.
There have been downloaded 3 different specimens collected at different times.

21.09.2015 6:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Please try again to attach the underside, but to no avail.

21.09.2015 5:58, Yuri Semejkin:

http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43638 Another glitch. Instead underside butterflies appeared beetle.

21.09.2015 5:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Calinaga davidis

21.09.2015 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, height-would be more necessary.
This is necessary to accommodate the large photo collection specimens of beetles, for example.
In most of these cases, the most appropriate vertical shot.

21.09.2015 5:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, in order to understand the current name just a few seconds to dial in Yandex word "Ctalinabad." If a person has the ability to browse the site - it automatically has a connection to the Internet and the ability to use search engines. The first in a row the same link to Wikipedia will obyasnenie.This is an extreme case.
In fact, nothing to find out it was not necessary: ​​in the beginning, I made a note of the Russian language in a comment about the modern name.
Just rename the label information is not accepted, depending on the change of name names.His position I have expressed, if not satisfied with the writing of the geography for instance, collected in '63 a year ago - then it is necessary either to delete the photo or photos to do for such an exception.
And I did not change its position even in favor of the site. Just I will not post here photos of such copies.

21.09.2015 4:08, Yuri Semejkin:

What some argue. Here it was proposed to give the old and the modern name and the history of all remember. Only we must not forget that some, such settlements were renamed several times.
Basil! With regard to your point of view-for collectible specimens.Geography is a label that changes depending on the name of the place name is not overwritten, but remains unchanged ....... Basil, that people will listen to you Wait and I'm including the start we throw the geography of collection time. Personally, from me you can get, includingPrimorye with a number of Chinese names, which few people remember, and not all of them have in the internet and renamed several times in geography too. More for example a label can offer other countries where geography may also renamed. And how many seconds or minutes or months, you will need to understand how all the same pattern.So, let's not split hairs. There is a modern place name, and proceed from him, not from the time the geography sbora.Kto interested in history will find what he needs. And here still INSECTA!

21.09.2015 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill: Lino, I believe that for such a photo beetles necessary to make an exception and not interfere with them, "the pile" :)

20.09.2015 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I'm on page beetle you said about the only decision on this photo.
Bearing on supervision: Take at the beginning of the beetles (longhorn beetle is about I'll say first, but now I see the disorder as a whole). It is very much there, and how much, where and whom to add, etc. I know or will understand.

20.09.2015 23:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if this question ....
To close it definitively - to delete the photo. Other decisions I do not see.
Collected after 1952 this subspecies from me will be no more (I do not have them) (

20.09.2015 23:38, Peter Khramov:

In general, families in the framework of insects, of course, so that this feature becomes maloaktualnym. Yet, while it is, note that the list has its own (separate from the browser window), the scroll bar. That's using it and you can scroll down.In addition, I remind you that if you move the focus to the list (for example, by simply clicking on any element of it), and start typing the letters of the desired name from the keyboard, the cursor will move to it. Ie press the P - the cursor will move directly to the first family of the letter R. If you immediately will gain further, it will move on. Iewill type Papil, the cursor will jump to the first P, then at Pa, then to the Pap, then at Papi, then on Papil.
This and other lists also works.

20.09.2015 23:33, Peter Khramov:

There is the following question: Now You Do / restore rights curators, and so, to whom do the right at all nasekomyshey besides me? Ie whether there is in your opinion the people who might have added, if necessary, form (eg Fota there, and no species) for the taxa in which he is not in the tooth foot?

20.09.2015 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Ok, leave is of a size restriction.

20.09.2015 23:26, Peter Khramov:

Duplicate of service threads, people will also be useful: Here I want to find instances of bugs on the site, which were found in Dushanbe and the surrounding area. And this beetle I do not find http://insecta.pro/gallery/43546. And it is necessary to find.

20.09.2015 23:24, Peter Khramov:

Here I want to find instances of bugs on the site, which were found in Dushanbe and the surrounding area. And this beetle I do not find http://insecta.pro/gallery/43546. And it is necessary to find.

20.09.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Briefly, and for human beings.
I was just about what changed in such cases, even a tiny fraction - a crime.
There was, I had at least one copy. this subspecies (by the way: it was described only in 1945, ie,seven years before the time of collection), which was compiled after renaming back to Dushanbe, then I would have and wrote: Dushanbe :)
And now for myself I considered the matter closed and remain unconvinced.

20.09.2015 23:01, Irina Nikulina:

No one attempted to label and was not about to rewrite and bring it in line, and so on ... Once again you have not heard (I will not repeat. The second sentence do not understand what in a given situation.

20.09.2015 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, your position is clear. Now we are about the label that does not speak.

20.09.2015 22:49, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Thanks, helped.

20.09.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, no fire, Irina.
The approach to entomological label on a site that claims to be serious (yet unfortunately in my dreams) must be serious and truthful.
Geographic entomological label (or in this case, it is also the historical) is constant, and align its current name not be.A tie to the map and you can not accurately denote present name.
Especially in this case, I explained that this Dushanbe.The geographical coordinates of the area in contrast to the constant name and eventually do not change :)
By the way, no I do not recall how many years has been talk about the relation to the card? Seriously I do not remember :)
P.S. This is even more rare instances., And in this case there can be no talk about changing anything.There's even raspravka original and I do not change it at their own discretion.

20.09.2015 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eliminating this moment :)

20.09.2015 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicindela soluta / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

20.09.2015 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cylindera arenaria / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

20.09.2015 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cylindera arenaria / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

20.09.2015 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We were full of it this year: As always, after approx. early 1990s (then began to appear, as was previously rare).
The picture is old, because they do not take it off for a long time :)

20.09.2015 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It will be right :)

20.09.2015 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #43621 group.

20.09.2015 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

20.09.2015 22:07, Irina Nikulina:

I foresee that call and fire on his head), the more that I am not a collector, but I read the debate and I can not write, even without the request of Alexander. You really say about different , and Vasily some reason does not want to see it.After all, we are not talking about the label as such, but on the representation of a particular instance of a particular website . To save time, I do not want to repeat the position of Alexander 19.33, but it is understandable and out does not mean that someone is not mindful of history, is going to rewrite the label, it is true, in my opinion, is about to as accurately attach copies. Online geographic point with its modern name - is required for the subsequent binding to the map.I do not quite understand what is disrespect for the label, if the bring it fully in its original form in the comment author. Or rather, I do not understand. It seems to me most suitable third option. Either 2nd. Here is the view - with all due respect to the labeling and collectors.

20.09.2015 21:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Seems bug happened to be here ...

20.09.2015 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, all the same answer :)
I also Stalingrad will be later because of the crop year.
Here everything is possible and everything will be clear even without explanation)))
Geography, which is on the label should be honored and bring it into full compliance with the time the insect collection.
Giving just in case the explanation in a separate comment, a self.It's like in the books are there to explain the remarks.

20.09.2015 21:32, Ivan Tislenko:

This year, the first and only time this bug met in St. Petersburg. It is a pity that the camera was not with him.

20.09.2015 21:27, Igor Sakhno:

Cylindera arenaria

20.09.2015 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, outside Moscow comrade here for the kit :)

20.09.2015 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill to finally close the issue.
Rewrite the label is like, what to take and rewrite the text books, written before 1914, and published in the period from 1924 to 1992, replacing Saint Petersburg to Leningrad (
Petrograd, the city was called a short time, so do not take into account).
I do not think it's right.

20.09.2015 21:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

I ask all participants to express service themes. I understand the case of private, collection of old specimens exposed to one. But in place of Time and place / fishing:
for a photo in nature clear how we write the place and for the collector's item?
Options: 1. Data Labels (only those that are on the label) Tajikistan Stalinabad
2.These labels with a breakdown in the [Soviet] Tajikistan [Skye SSR] Stalinabat. [modern Dushanbe].
3. Only the modern name of Tajikistan, Dushanbe. The label is in the comments of the author.
Start the discussion:
http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43546

20.09.2015 20:58, Igor Sakhno:

Cicindela soluta

20.09.2015 20:28, Ivan Tislenko:

It is necessary in any row pop-up list, and poked the down arrow or Page Down to navigate through it

20.09.2015 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I immediately give an explanation for those who do not know / can not remember, or trying to forget the story (it happens unfortunately) :(
For images in the nature of geography into the shooting, but for collection specimens. Geography is a label that changes depending on the name of the place name is not overwritten, but remains unchanged.Come on it and otanovimsya. I know how I fill out such things)))

20.09.2015 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, or I'm bad or explain something, we understand differently. What you write about the labels, all right, this is a truism. And when publishing label of course saved the entire text, with the possible addition of the omission or deciphering acronyms. All of which nebylo on the label is given in brackets. [].In this case, the total label would be shown as: [USSR] Tajikistan [Skye SSR] Stalinabat. But on our website: Time and place / fishing: So there it is desirable to give the geography in its present form, and in the comments to the author's original inscription labels.Date is always the date and the name of the countries, regions and even rivers and mountains can change, we have the whole geography and search engines attached to its present name. Therefore, it is necessary to give a maximum of geography to-date information, and even the details :) as you do for the new species.And to try to bring modern old common names.

20.09.2015 19:08, Vladimir Bryukhov:

And what about the catalog? Trying to find your region Geometridae - pop up in the list of families are listed only on the letter "A". I tried through random taxon to find something - anything either betrays. Maybe I'm doing wrong? On Lepidoptera.ru no problems.

20.09.2015 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Linnaeus need to improve again: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/1019861
Already somewhere I raised the issue, but forgot where.

20.09.2015 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, is another example.
Here: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/834968 no extensive and popular tropical genus Chrysochroa Laporte & Carcel, 1833
In honor of this kind actually named subfamilies and tribes in which he is :)
For a number of species there are in my collection, and put "to nowhere," I do not want.
It is necessary all the same to open manually add taxa. Already overdue.

20.09.2015 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Same thing. I still have such historical items in the collection. But with them and begin.
A beetle is the way 63 and it is much "older" than many of us here :)

20.09.2015 16:09, Alexander Belousov:

And if no extra writing of comments like this _ 05.18.1952 00:00:00, Tajikistan, Stalinabad (modern. Dushanbe)

20.09.2015 15:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter.
Keep Irina.
Sam often load up certain subspecies and species of beetles are not illustrated - disorder ((
Establish the case, please.

20.09.2015 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, about collectible copies.
The thing is that at the time when the collected insect officially existed toponym Dushanbe and was Stalinabad ..
A "geography is a continuation of date." So I bring the text in the original.
And for those, who do not know: the modern name of a better result in the commentary.It is generally considered bad manners to change the label text has changed over time, if the name of the area where it was collected insect. Label, is a kind of history too :)
I have a number of insects with similar labels. And if I will upload something I will do it this way, giving an explanation.

20.09.2015 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I think we had the opposite: in the place of fishing - the modern name (can not find the line label), and the comments of the author labels the data, very interesting information.

20.09.2015 12:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Panaorus csikii

20.09.2015 12:05, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, I remind you, just in case that illustrate the kinds of images supplied with the definition of to the subspecies , is impossible. And LC I species such as "non-illustrated species for which there are already photos" do not appear. I find them by accident. They are not one and not two .. Today here's another added.

20.09.2015 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The label is shown in the original, so I will explain for those who do not know)
Stalinabad - is the current Dushanbe.

20.09.2015 10:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Here Bugs World https://www.kaefer-der-welt.de/ Probably there and DV

20.09.2015 10:29, Yuri Semejkin:

I only know these http://www.zin.ru/ANIMALIA/Coleoptera/rus/ber_zoo.htm

20.09.2015 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Damn pleased that once there based both on the territory of the rarest species ECHR :))
And that is able to submit online their findings, both from the same area.
All. It seems kind of Danosoma equipped with a photo)))

20.09.2015 8:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

The issue is probably on electronic databases, not on paper.

20.09.2015 8:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strange.
Like in the form of this animal immediately put ....

20.09.2015 8:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurythyrea aurata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.09.2015 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurythyrea aurata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.09.2015 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The units, of course: what just came ..
The order Coleoptera in one night and not by one person prosherstit: this work will take a few years at best .......
Here it is necessary to add the missing on the fly.

20.09.2015 4:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Panaorusami zanimaetsya Vinokourov, who is also involved in their determinant ET. In the catalog poluzhёstkokrylyh Asian part of Russia, where he is the 1st They royalties made given 4 types:
1. Panaorus adspersus; 2. P. albomaculatus (Scott, 1874); 3. P. czikii (Horvath, 1901). Here on my website, etc. reset. View http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43485 It is given according Kanyukovoy kakPanaorus csikii. in the internet, too, is there. And so, how to spell the Panaorus hope you will understand ..
4.Panaorus japonicus (Stal, 1874)

20.09.2015 2:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Where can I ship worldwide by ET, such as Peter, and so well known. It:
1. Keys to insects of the Far East of the USSR. Volumes 1 to 5.
Additionally, you can probably see:
2. S. Yu Storozhenko ensifera insects (ORTHOPTERA: ENSIFERA) Asian part of Russia. Vladivostok Dal'nauka 2004 A review of the fauna of Siberia and the Far East. 300 copies .; 280 pages.
3. E.B. Kanyukova. Aquatic insects poluzhёstkokrylye (HETEROPTERA: NEPOMORPHA, GERROMORPHA) of Russia and adjacent countries. Vladivostok Dal'nauka, 2006 300 copies. 297 p.
Circulations are small and in addition to, and copies of copyright BPI library, I do not know where they are still there. But I think you will find Peter, they definitely need to be in ZIN. At the time you are given.The rest are scattered in various sources as separate publications. However, some of what I can not know.

19.09.2015 23:32, Peter Khramov:

No individual units or not a single piece?

19.09.2015 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something any taxa still not in the database (there are examples). There are currently no Osmoderma barnabita and Dytilus laevis (not yet downloaded). Open manually add taxa: we correct these deficiencies. So as the tropics and the Far East should be added.

19.09.2015 21:59, Ivan Tislenko:

Thank you! All work - mohnatka Download to 1200x800 native resolution http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43519

19.09.2015 21:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mylabris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Did 800. Download now see. Just keep in mind that if the screen is not intermeddle phot, by increasing the site it will not be displayed 100% and less.

19.09.2015 21:43, Peter Khramov:

The system area.

19.09.2015 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As with the addition of missing taxa manually? I do not see such a possibility.

19.09.2015 21:33, Ivan Tislenko:

Maybe all the same to 800 pixels vertically to increase? I have hundreds of photos posted on makroklube basically the size of 1200x800 - thought leisurely upload them here without further processing. Well, if not, it will be cut.

19.09.2015 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Calvia decemguttata.

19.09.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Selatosomus cruciatus / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Selatosomus cruciatus / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2015 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Selatosomus cruciatus / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2015 21:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Panaorus adspersus.

19.09.2015 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Pytho depressus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Pytho depressus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Lucanus cervus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Lucanus cervus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Dorcus parallelipipedus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Dorcus parallelipipedus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Dorcus parallelipipedus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Dorcus parallelipipedus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cucujus cinnaberinus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cucujus cinnaberinus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cucujus cinnaberinus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cucujus cinnaberinus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boros schneideri / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Boros schneideri / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 21:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Halyzia sedecimguttata / Ivan Tislenko.

19.09.2015 21:12, Peter Khramov:

Excuse me, I lied.
Now here is the limitation is: 1280x768.
At the same time, until recently, it was different for photons, which are loaded one by one and that Georgia Archive. Now all the same.
I think it is not necessary to do more (when viewed on a FullHD in the browser is not very cluttered quite logical limitation).If there are other opinions - reported.

19.09.2015 21:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurydema oleracea / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2015 21:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurydema ventralis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2015 21:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dolycoris baccarum / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2015 21:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pterostichus Pterostichus oblongopunctatus.

19.09.2015 21:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pterostichus Pterostichus oblongopunctatus.

19.09.2015 21:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pterostichus Pterostichus oblongopunctatus.

19.09.2015 21:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Anthrenus Anthrenus picturatus.

19.09.2015 21:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Anthrenus Anthrenus picturatus.

19.09.2015 20:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Coranus / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2015 20:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Coranus / Shamil Murtazin.

19.09.2015 20:55, Peter Khramov:

Taxa for Europe and Russia have been updated. You can ship / carry foty etc.
Please facilitators / moderators to check the database of taxa in general, the responsibility, if everything is OK, we will restore access to editing taxa.

19.09.2015 20:54, Peter Khramov:

Correct the error because of which on the site there was a large number of European and Russian species of insects, now these taxa are added, you can safely ship the textual and graphical information to them.
ZY If anyone has suggestions from worldwide shipping types in the Far East - write. If not, then we will add is the hands on one.Zzy Who can be saved with glitches "kakbe duplicates' taxa, in fact it does not duplicate, rather, display issues. Soon we will fly.

19.09.2015 20:51, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Peribalus strictus / Ivan Tislenko.

19.09.2015 20:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cerocoma schaefferi / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2015 18:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Clogmia albipunctata, Gunnar M Kvifte, diptera.info

19.09.2015 18:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Clogmia albipunctata, Gunnar M Kvifte, diptera.info

19.09.2015 17:54, Ivan Tislenko:

It appears that when loading squeezed up to 768 vertical pixels. In the gallery among the latest uploaded photos found with the vertical resolution over 768.

19.09.2015 17:28, Ivan Tislenko:

Upload a photo 1200x800. When open it online http://insecta.pro/images/1024/43503.jpg and save to your computer, its resolution 1152h768

19.09.2015 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.09.2015 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.09.2015 16:39, Peter Khramov:

Now this infa outdated and need to enter in 1280x800. The section write.

19.09.2015 16:34, Ivan Tislenko:

"To maintain the highest quality (if you are sure that it is the quality of the original available) is shipping foty inscribed in 1024x768" - it would be good to register in the section "Upload photos". Loads your photos and 1200x800 just noticed the loss of detail.

This is contrary to http: // insecta.pro / ru / terms:
Technical wishes to snapshots
Recommended size zagruzhyemyh photos - 1280 on the larger side.

19.09.2015 16:21, Ivan Tislenko:

Peribalus strictus (Fabricius, 1803)

19.09.2015 16:20, Ivan Tislenko:

Halyzia sedecimguttata (Linnaeus, 1758)

19.09.2015 16:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, he did smotritsya.Starayus not possible to shift the colors - on the principle of living objects should be depicted as they are. It is at the time of the shooting.
And so, you and Basil are both somewhere right. I've seen more reddish, but I did not ask the reason why this is happening.From the months of the year, light exposure (sun, cloudy), time (early morning, noon, afternoon, sunset). All these conditions give their shades, -on all subjects.
These bugs certainly have Nikulin. Ask let deliver to compare.

19.09.2015 16:14, Ivan Tislenko:

On makroide only one instance of red, the others are the same orange-yellow http://macroid.ru/showgallery.php?cat=14303&mode=box

19.09.2015 15:41, Vera Volkotrub:

Cave Boldyrev grasshopper?

19.09.2015 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fading likely. The red pigment in insects is very unstable to direct sunlight.

19.09.2015 15:24, Peter Khramov:

By the way, the color really have Nigo such toward yellow? Once Rubria should be even redder than usual ...

19.09.2015 15:23, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, yes, I understand. Just funny that in the Far East constantly have their own versions of the thread of European species.

19.09.2015 13:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! These are different types and they have different geography. Lineatuma here in Primorye with the words Kanyukovoy no literature stated.

19.09.2015 12:43, Shamil Murtazin:

And that, apparently, the adult? .. Will practice spread)

19.09.2015 12:42, Shamil Murtazin:

As far as I understand, only the nymphs wear camouflage? ..

19.09.2015 12:28, Peter Khramov:

Wow. Even rubro_lineatum there.

19.09.2015 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When the taxon-bear.
Just something removed from the top row of the species name (it should not be there) .....

19.09.2015 10:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Shamil! I'm an Internet and realized that they say about the length, not the wingspan. Also something about it .. I'm trying to find out who, when and where (ies) involved in the family according to ET. Dal Old, that large are also known to Ufa. Even if everything and work out, then the definition of further kinds hardly take place. For one family asked to double-check.

19.09.2015 9:36, Shamil Murtazin:

Somehow I registered on diptera.info Maybe there defined. With regard to size. On the same site is measured by the size of the calf, ie from head to tail, instead wingspan.

19.09.2015 7:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

19.09.2015 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

19.09.2015 7:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Attelabidae Apoderus jekeli.

19.09.2015 6:54, Vera Volkotrub:

Apoderus jekeli

19.09.2015 3:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Then yes.

19.09.2015 3:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He "always" have (common in the entire area) :)
Including on the balcony of me: the light crowds flies.
Pentatoma rufipes is)

19.09.2015 1:51, Yuri Semejkin:

I would say yes. If you have this kind in Ukraine.

18.09.2015 23:44, Igor Sakhno:

pentatoma rufipes ?

18.09.2015 23:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Diptera Tephritidae.

18.09.2015 23:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Diptera Bombyliidae.

18.09.2015 23:19, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Diptera Bombyliidae.

18.09.2015 22:50, Fedor Ovechkin:

Bombyliidae

18.09.2015 22:50, Fedor Ovechkin:

Bombyliidae

18.09.2015 22:49, Fedor Ovechkin:

Tephritidae

18.09.2015 17:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Groundglass very possible M. hybrida. - Surely differ only in the genitals.

18.09.2015 16:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Panaorus csikii

18.09.2015 16:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Panaorus adspersus

18.09.2015 16:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, like always immediately associate. Here is a simple variation on the numbers. While the 2nd found ....

18.09.2015 16:09, Irina Nikulina:

Remaining doubts expressed a similar caterpillar here http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/28885. But now, I would rather it to Euproctis riperita carried)

18.09.2015 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Just wanted to relate to the group of pigs and they are already in the group :))

18.09.2015 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drymonia dodonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2015 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drymonia dodonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2015 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drymonia dodonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2015 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drymonia dodonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2015 15:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drymonia dodonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2015 15:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Robot Yuri Semejkin.

18.09.2015 15:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera Mythimna postica.

18.09.2015 14:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Mythimna postica Identified Matov AY ZIN.

18.09.2015 14:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Mats also identified as Ctenoplusia agnata

18.09.2015 13:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Phytocoris intricatus

18.09.2015 13:55, Irina Nikulina:

Furcula furcula sangaica ?

18.09.2015 13:55, Irina Nikulina:

Furcula furcula sangaica, I think

18.09.2015 13:54, Irina Nikulina:

Drymonia dodonides? (There were doubts about Drymonia japonica)

18.09.2015 13:53, Irina Nikulina:

Drymonia dodonides ?

18.09.2015 13:53, Irina Nikulina:

Drymonia dodonides, I think

18.09.2015 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

18.09.2015 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

18.09.2015 11:55, Yuri Semejkin:

The discrepancy with the taxon available online. The site is taxon Limois emeljanovi Oshanin, 1908. Initially, I was given this post. But then came a letter with the request to correct the record and got kind Limois emenovi Oshanin, 1908.

18.09.2015 11:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

Unfortunately, the kind of photos can not be determined. By spreading and appearance fitMicomitra irisandMicomitra stupida.

18.09.2015 10:14, Ivan Tislenko:

I will be here to unsubscribe if even find duplicates. Looking issued all doubles - maybe on the machine they will be found and drain if the search to sort out all kinds of names without attribution.

18.09.2015 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

There's all kind of clumsy, there are 4 taxa with the same name, the authors completely, reducing the authors, without the author's different authors. Probably will have to manually merge the curators.

18.09.2015 9:49, Ivan Tislenko:

Upload a photo Curculio arborator - under a taxon reserved 2:
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/238036
http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/237365

18.09.2015 8:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander realized uchtu.
The thing is that I followed the debate, which, alas, was not.
A press of a button for me Oleg is a call to action.
In this case, just keep quiet should not have)))

18.09.2015 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When there are more species of bear and loading straightened 2 males and one female from the collection :)

18.09.2015 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

18.09.2015 8:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Lucanus maculifemoratus dybowskyi Parry-Rogach Dybowski

18.09.2015 7:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

18.09.2015 7:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I explained why I put in inaccurate. I repeat: except for a few doubles> puerpera-orientalis, elocata-deducta, but the independence of the twins being questioned If Oleg finds that orientalis , a synonym if accurate, I do not have firm belief in this, and therefore put into inaccurate. Wrap back is not necessary, this remark for the future.

18.09.2015 5:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.09.2015 5:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

17.09.2015 23:50, Peter Khramov:

With the addition of comments to leave - corrected. About Butterflies - it is spread in popularity not large enough to statistics (the counters are reset to zero when switching to insects).

17.09.2015 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Exoprosopini Villa occulta.

17.09.2015 22:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

Villa occulta

17.09.2015 21:48, Ivan Tislenko:

I was embarrassed that my case was not one of the main taxa - Squad.

17.09.2015 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil suddenly happen if such meetings - must take.
This is a bug of my dreams))
I would be very grateful :)))

17.09.2015 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Counter photographs is not working. :(

17.09.2015 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Class-squad-family-Rhode view - are the main taxa that are required to be in each species, all other taxa subsidiary. Can be if necessary, may not be. :)
In the above example, you glitch http: // insecta.pro / ru / taxonomy / 976,845, pressing family Cetoniidae, go all the high taxa: Insecta → subclass infraclass Pterygota → Neoptera → superorder Holometabola → squad Coleoptera → suborder Polyphaga → infraorder superfamily Scarabeiformia → Scarabaeoidea

17.09.2015 21:30, Ivan Tislenko:

From the "authors" did not work at all links to photos and comments.
I've uploaded a few pictures, but in the "Authors" is not to score.

17.09.2015 21:03, Ivan Tislenko:

Another question - why some species in the description in the "System" shows all ranks from class to species, while others only Class-Family-Rod-type (eg, http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/976845)?

17.09.2015 20:57, Ivan Tislenko:

Uploaded Barid wormwood - for it online already allocated 5 taxa:
http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/225800
http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/225405
http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/225399
http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/224950
http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/225398

Moreover, none of the above does not match any Zine (where Panzer, 1794 http://www.zin.ru/ANIMAliA/COlEOPTERA/rus/barid_sf.htm), nor makroidom (there Herbst, 1795 http: // macroid .ru / showgallery.php? cat = 28783)

17.09.2015 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chrysolina fastuosa Scopoli, 1763? Insecure because, as the seashore. Let even lie down.
Can and will the man who knows well the Far East Chrysolina.

17.09.2015 15:45, Vera Volkotrub:

Thank you. I'll know.

17.09.2015 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

File name sees only the author of photos. It would be nice if the name of the species was duplicated in the comments avtororom photos, in order to avoid misunderstandings with the authorship definition. :)

17.09.2015 15:28, Vera Volkotrub:

Type the title of the file. While there is no shelf under it.

17.09.2015 15:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Aiolocaria hexaspilota (Hope, 1831)

17.09.2015 15:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Aiolocaria hexaspilota (Hope, 1831). Cow amazing.

17.09.2015 12:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Funny happened. Butterfly is the same =)

17.09.2015 10:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Vasily, thank you :) This case was in the garden, so it will probably re-encounter. For your reserve, I understand? =)

17.09.2015 10:22, Yuri Semejkin:

The size of about 2 cm Side view of tomorrow skins.

17.09.2015 10:02, Yuri Semejkin:

He introduced the word in the search engines large and nothing new major. As there is little, -up to 2 mm. More infu found that the family of the Russian Far East is poorly (data source, 2008), but judging by the infe Shamil, not only in the Far East, since in different regions Krupnyakov skipped. So we Shamil.mozhet new species?
We'll have to ask around, maybe that will become clear.

17.09.2015 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. And there the whole race seems Wool necessary. While on the subject of CAPSA.

17.09.2015 8:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

In determining the caterpillars also it helps rakur side, and of course the size. :)

17.09.2015 8:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/190960 caps should be removed from the names of Ator descriptions and enclosed in brackets.
It should look like this: Eulasia hyrax (Truqui, 1848)
Costs automatically add taxa and types of pages comments of this kind do not want to score.
Therefore I write here.
Similarly, I feel, many more will have to correct immediately the detection.Otherwise zarastёm never razgrebёm later.

17.09.2015 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, do not be offended, but I like this sort as "dead a poultice." It is necessary, of course, but for now easily get around without it. I speak for the aesthetics and order, which must be in the gallery by default. And to achieve this can only ourselves and no sorting is not required.You just have to watch someone online before downloading, come-whether new images in the gallery and on the basis of this include some logic :)
This helps me a great mark of "online" on page authors :)
It is currently not and now I feel like a Don Quixote who is fighting with windmills,unsuccessfully trying to explain why it is really necessary (
P.S. I can work in peace, but only if I'm not clinging is not the case (think so).

16.09.2015 23:10, Peter Khramov:

The fact of the matter is that you are not working safely.
And to the gallery related species were close - it is necessary to do the sorting in the vicinity of species rather than trying to load in a row.

16.09.2015 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, congratulations :)
We in the Ministry of Defense is a very rare and valuable beetle. All are chasing him, and known only isolated finds.
P.S. A male in his class in general: http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/odoarmsu.htm)))
Probably close mushrooms truffles there? It seems to them develops.

16.09.2015 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

16.09.2015 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxytelinae / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.09.2015 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.09.2015 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cryptocephalus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.09.2015 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.09.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.09.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Odonteus armiger / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.09.2015 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Odonteus armiger / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.09.2015 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mylabris sp.

16.09.2015 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I Guess Mylabris quadripunctata (Linnaeus, 1767)

16.09.2015 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mylabris quadripunctata (Linnaeus, 1767)?
First of all I think on it. The question mark is because, as a huge genus (160 species) and a lot of similar appearance.

16.09.2015 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female Cerocoma schaefferi (Linnaeus, 1758) Meloidae

16.09.2015 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nicrophorus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.09.2015 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nicrophorus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.09.2015 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Micomitra.

16.09.2015 21:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

Micomitra

16.09.2015 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geron Geron argentifrons.

16.09.2015 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Geron Geron argentifrons.

16.09.2015 20:42, Fedor Ovechkin:

Geron argentifrons

16.09.2015 20:42, Fedor Ovechkin:

Geron argentifrons

16.09.2015 20:12, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!

16.09.2015 19:08, Shamil Murtazin:

I, too, have been healthy. Maybe they "fade" and grow? =)

16.09.2015 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aspitates ochrearia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2015 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aspitates ochrearia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2015 18:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wow, when I did not know that they have such byvayut.U really small, can in the internet information on European species?

16.09.2015 18:35, Yuri Semejkin:

With the family agrees. I do not agree with infoy Internet, write -vezde moth flies the length does not exceed 3-4 mm. So while not forget to specify the size. In this case, the length of at least 1 cm. In another, if it is, how it is, sit on the thumbnail, it will close it completely, perhaps sometimes even speaking of a fingernail.

16.09.2015 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, then remove these counters nafig not to confuse. The same thing)
About interrupts: I prefer to related species that sometimes load as possible were in the gallery next door, and not mixed with completely different insects, which sometimes get stuck between them. I do not like a hodgepodge (
To do this, always before you upload look no ship-anyone else.I'd rather wait replaced)
Other ways to navigate the prioritization downloads simply do not and never will. Therefore, it is important.
As for the third question.
Here, too, everything is clear: I'm a hard-nosed and Alexander too. From this and inconsistencies. Alexander will stop and I will stop. I give the palm to him since, in most cases it starts.And on Skype to discuss nothing. It's all clear that Skype will not help.
We work quietly.

16.09.2015 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Psychodidae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2015 17:17, Peter Khramov:

1. Concerning online - yes, there is a problem, fix it, but not immediately.
2. Regarding argnumentatsii why it is necessary infa about online - Basil, it is complete nonsense. What other gaps? We got that, still looking a gallery of photos of 35,000 just flipping through the pages, all in a row? Gallery does not make any sense at all is no selection on the parameters.And in the parameters if you need it, the authors point out, and all that there is no discontinuity. Economize, when one ship - it is again the field of books and other nedosaytov.
3. Pro photo counter - I told you earlier too. Their existence on this page in question.
4.Alexander, Basil, you have all talked like a thread on Skype and settled all the questions, and you can run up to a situation that has been discussed and there will be nothing. I would very much not like. And for the site it will harm.

16.09.2015 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, the question was addressed to Peter. I'm frankly tired of your constant already slinging: Aby dig down and discuss, I'm not going to.
I noticed on the technical inconveniences that really interfere with my work
And I'm not focused on myself and just gave an example of what is an inconvenience.And I'm sure that one is not for me to interfere with work
Here, after all, and full pimerov of you where you spoke to Peter about his, curatorial inconvenience (which is in fact no one regards except you). And no one side did not interfere.And from here such "little things" often emerging global thing and therefore it is necessary to rule until obrasli outrageously.

16.09.2015 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I certainly could not right, that fit, but if it were a private message, you would have written to Peter PM. But lacking a little. You for the site or the site for you. Who's stopping you to load a photo? you load to the species or to the gallery pictures, or who do not interfere. Does it bother you? that in kindergarten.That's the way the site, all photos are loaded into the gallery, This is not a forum mobiol where such comments are appropriate when the types and photos are in the boot sequence, here they are placed in the directory.
We all know that the site is moving that up to ten times what is fitting directories and much more. Well, not the most important label in the "online".Well, you do not give instructions to Peter, he is better than you know what to do. If a glitch specify where and that, depending on the complexity and importance of correct Peter. And that the counter does not work, it's probably the most important indicator for a site to be seen as a photo Upload Vasiliy Feoktistov. Sick of nagging, on minor issues.

16.09.2015 12:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, figure it out, please to page authors to be seen who is on the site online.
The thing is that all the downloads I have planned and come together as one. It is not good when someone "breaks" and my series of photos getting ripped strangers.So is very uncomfortable and when to get into someone else's load (((
If you can see who is online at the moment - it allows you to make a decision immediately or wait for shipping.
P.S. And tidy counters picture on this page (wrote earlier) :)

16.09.2015 12:02, Oleg Pekarsky:

Do not load a comment to the genus Naarda.

15.09.2015 23:42, Peter Khramov:

This is because of what is now out of sync sample of the countries and regions of Russia. The second operation is not correct. Ie if you need a sample of the Russian Federation, the results will be adequate, if you select all its regions, not just a country in the list (in the latter case will be output, mainly Europe).Accordingly, here and now, you can use the tips above, and for the future - yes, we will edit and synchronize.
In an open discussion, and P. arcticus - understand and see.

15.09.2015 17:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.09.2015 17:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia blattariae / Tentatively identified / Svetlana Karaeva Cucullia verbasci / Confidently identified / Oleg Pekarsky.

15.09.2015 17:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia blattariae / Tentatively identified / Svetlana Karaeva Cucullia verbasci / Confidently identified / Oleg Pekarsky.

15.09.2015 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia scrophulariae / Sergey Novitckiy Cucullia verbasci / Oleg Pekarsky.

15.09.2015 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.09.2015 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.09.2015 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia scrophulariae / Sergey Novitckiy Cucullia verbasci / Oleg Pekarsky.

15.09.2015 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.09.2015 14:12, Oleg Pekarsky:

S. verbasci

15.09.2015 14:11, Oleg Pekarsky:

S. verbasci

15.09.2015 14:11, Oleg Pekarsky:

S. verbasci

15.09.2015 14:10, Oleg Pekarsky:

S. verbasci

15.09.2015 14:07, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

15.09.2015 14:02, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

15.09.2015 14:02, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

15.09.2015 14:00, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

15.09.2015 13:58, Yuri Semejkin:

No, I have not looked back.

15.09.2015 13:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I can not understand, but with the kind of butterflies Lelita Clarke, 1978 http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/gelechioidea/oecophoridae/oecophorinae/lelita/ the genus bugs Lelia Walker, 1867. This is not a typo. Just this kind is not in the catalog on the website, after the removal of the moratorium on the addition of new taxa in the catalog, I personally inserted, once literature it is already loaded.We do not worry, have patience and wait for directory updates. :)))

15.09.2015 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dina Rogatnykh Denis Tumanov.

15.09.2015 13:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Anthomyia illocata.

15.09.2015 12:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Typo typo! Alexander, in the internet is not so rare to find a different kind of units with the same name. I have not once this stalkivalsya.Eto first.
Second, the recent interest from Kanyukovoy just that originally Lelia. She said that this is our kind of purely ET. If I consider it necessary to ask again tomorrow how what she would say.

15.09.2015 12:32, Fedor Ovechkin:

Anthomyia illocata

15.09.2015 12:31, Irina Nikulina:

In V.Palearktike subspecies Clostera albosigma curtuloides Erschoff, 1870 (to the insects of the Russian Far East, v.5, Part 3, p. 588) All other photos here albosigma also belong to this subspecies.

15.09.2015 12:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pentatomini / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

15.09.2015 12:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, this is probably not a typo, you brought moth genus of the family shirokokrylyh moles - Oecophoridae. With a directory takes Peter. Moderated by hand hammered views. While such a process, the manual was in butterflies. the remaining groups While Peter did not finish it the directory moratorium on hand hammering. :)

15.09.2015 12:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lelita / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Not identified.

15.09.2015 11:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! The site probably a typo. In the catalog of bugs ET (The full name of the directory I have already cited, moreover, included him in a list of references that site) as the Lelita this kind does not exist. There Lelia Walker, 1867 from the tribe Pentatomini Leach, 1815
I do not know where you ASSUME that.However, information on the number of genera and species of the families shown Catalog poluzhёstkokrylyh Palearctic [Catalogue of the Heteroptera of the Palaearctic Region] and T. Henry [Henry, 2009]

15.09.2015 11:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Ok!

15.09.2015 11:05, Alexey Makarov:

Also sampled the parameters: Russia, Papilionidae misses Papilio maackii

15.09.2015 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Such as there is none.

15.09.2015 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Pentatomini / Yuri Semejkin.

15.09.2015 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yura, I do not see this type in the database. :( We are waiting.

15.09.2015 10:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Rhode Pentatoma Oliver, 1789

15.09.2015 10:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Here, too, the tribe Pentatomini Leach, 1815. Rhode Pentatoma Oliver, 1789.

15.09.2015 10:44, Alexey Makarov:

Good afternoon! Where disappeared Parnassius arcticus? If renamed Sachaia arctica then where are the pictures and description, which has been before.

15.09.2015 10:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pentatomini / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

15.09.2015 10:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pentatomidae.

15.09.2015 10:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

15.09.2015 10:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Pentatomidae sp.

14.09.2015 23:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Stigmella sp. shipping? It is hardly the type to be determined ...

14.09.2015 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Atylotus fulvus.

14.09.2015 23:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

Atylotus fulvus

14.09.2015 22:24, Shamil Murtazin:

In the "open discussion" all dates - 01.01.1970. Gluck some ...

14.09.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah turned .... Well let there be inaccurate :)

14.09.2015 22:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Well, that's his phrase - http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&view=findpost&p=1578285
how to interpret it yet?

14.09.2015 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strange that inaccurate. Fornax13 kind rarely determines about .....

14.09.2015 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleonus ignobilis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

14.09.2015 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleonus ignobilis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

14.09.2015 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleonus ignobilis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

14.09.2015 21:53, Shamil Murtazin:

Stephanocleonus ignobilis - inaccurately, Alexei Kovalev

14.09.2015 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Eugene Karolinskiy.

14.09.2015 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Eugene Karolinskiy.

14.09.2015 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Eugene Karolinskiy.

14.09.2015 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Eugene Karolinskiy.

14.09.2015 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Hylemya.

14.09.2015 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Hylemya.

14.09.2015 21:35, Fedor Ovechkin:

Hylemya

14.09.2015 21:35, Fedor Ovechkin:

Hylemya

14.09.2015 18:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Coranus sp.

14.09.2015 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you.

14.09.2015 18:16, Peter Khramov:

The source added.

14.09.2015 18:15, Peter Khramov:

Alex, thanks for the tip, corrected.

14.09.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plagionotus floralis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.09.2015 17:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

14.09.2015 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

A what?

14.09.2015 16:46, Oleg Pekarsky:

is not gamma

14.09.2015 16:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa gamma / Vitaly Gumenuk Autographa buraetica / Oleg Pekarsky.

14.09.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I can not figure out how to start the database, this source: https://apps2.cdfa.ca.gov/publicApps/plant/bycidDB/wdefault.asp?w=o
Have a look, please. By Cerambycidae is desired resource.

14.09.2015 16:44, Oleg Pekarsky:

This A. buraetica:))

14.09.2015 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.09.2015 16:36, Oleg Pekarsky: This species is identified correctly.

14.09.2015 16:32, Alexey Makarov:

Good afternoon, search does not work through the catalog. Search parameters: Country: Russia, taxon Papilionidae
You used the following selection parameters: Country / Region (Europe), Random taxon.
Selected species: Pages:
The species with the selected parameters found

14.09.2015 16:24, Oleg Pekarsky:

Yes, I would have suggested Egira anatolica.

14.09.2015 16:19, Oleg Pekarsky:

Most likely S. chamomillae.

14.09.2015 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.09.2015 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.09.2015 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.09.2015 16:13, Oleg Pekarsky:

A. clavis, without a doubt.

14.09.2015 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, in the deep pool for the time that can be shipped beetles and so on. I would have insect "palms" of water dragged in enough to not particularly painful was to jump :)
Self-other-if there was such a possibility ....

Peter, correct bug, please.If the form is no picture and try to offer a photo directly "out of form" - the site does not give the form download ((
Example here: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/160993 Try to click on the link "offer your photo Morimus ganglbaueri" , and see for himself.
Continuing on a run across in recent times, when new types of bet.You have to hand the title to drive and take the form of the top of the page. Abnormally it (

14.09.2015 16:11, Oleg Pekarsky:

Pakurs unsuitable for determination. Yet it lucifuga.

14.09.2015 16:08, Oleg Pekarsky:

Yes, it is C. algae

14.09.2015 15:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

14.09.2015 15:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

female

14.09.2015 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Exoprosopini.

14.09.2015 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Exoprosopini.

14.09.2015 14:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Geron.

14.09.2015 14:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Diptera Geron.

14.09.2015 14:35, Fedor Ovechkin:

Exoprosopini

14.09.2015 14:34, Fedor Ovechkin:

Exoprosopini

14.09.2015 12:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

Geron

14.09.2015 12:56, Fedor Ovechkin:

Geron

14.09.2015 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Swimming pool built, but the water still poured on, but we have to jump. :)))

14.09.2015 10:31, Peter Khramov:

I am five times (literally) wrote that the day will be updated on the European species. And separately written (in advance), it is not necessary to ship European species, even when there will be the possibility of adding new taxa, more must first be tsentrolizovannaya new dress and then hand supplements. But no.We cry again, that it is impossible to add new species to the European example.
That is why it or not.

14.09.2015 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.09.2015 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.09.2015 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago / Shamil Murtazin Male / Victor Titov.

14.09.2015 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

14.09.2015 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

14.09.2015 9:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

14.09.2015 9:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

14.09.2015 9:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Callidium violaceum / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.09.2015 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.09.2015 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Callidium violaceum.

14.09.2015 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.09.2015 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.09.2015 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callidium violaceum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.09.2015 8:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I confirm the words of Alexander ,. I got out and I have a problem with Lemonia taraxaci after I uploaded their photos added to form the Old and formalized. Then she was gone-a.

14.09.2015 8:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I'm just not one ship: pictures began to pour in from everywhere. And there will be more this is only the beginning.
Regarding its something I'm not worried. They are placed on sites without a problem :)
The problem is that corny zashёmsya pace and we must accelerate the process by all means: pictures, then knocked and with all groups and often vague.Tighten with the addition of taxa no longer - out time.

14.09.2015 7:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

And what ship pictures, if the form is not, nelya wait a while? Created appearance - made photos. And so much emotion squandered. :)))

14.09.2015 7:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

With the avatar was a glitch, but I did not do "Scrin" and she was gone from the screen was only when the sign on the right "Forum"
About sample tupil , but I'm not the only one :) I insert can be born and immediately turn on the region and select the taxon of the proposed since It may be two of the same genus and subgenus, and then the result is 0. :)

14.09.2015 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What changed it? The species is not so far (
And there is no possibility to add a (hopefully until today).
Uncomfortable work (
For me, the holiday has moments when you want to download the form and suddenly he finds himself in the database.
Then I jump for joy.
It will be possible to add species - will disappear, and the very wording of nenabnostyu :)

14.09.2015 0:15, Peter Khramov:

I propose a slightly reworded "as always".

14.09.2015 0:14, Peter Khramov:

So it is not in the database, and therefore not searched. One of these days there will be another update on the taxa.

13.09.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.09.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.09.2015 23:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes it works. But the rest, Coranus, for example, and are not searched.

13.09.2015 23:32, Peter Khramov:

I think you have Coreus With written in Russian, or something else like that. I copy-paste to your recording does not work, and if the dial again, all the rules. Check ...

13.09.2015 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

13.09.2015 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

13.09.2015 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Victor Titov.

13.09.2015 22:42, Shamil Murtazin:

If the load point that will be loaded ZIP, and upload an image - does not swear, but simply "resets" the download page (probably loads, it is impossible to decompress and just clears downloaded without returning an error)

13.09.2015 22:15, Shamil Murtazin:

Search in a row fell off. Including when downloading and editing photos is not working. I could not find Soreus marginatus, although recently uploaded it imago.

13.09.2015 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Leptopterna Leptopterna dolabrata.

13.09.2015 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, this one's not a typo: http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=105562
I stand

13.09.2015 22:05, Shamil Murtazin:

The site is kind - Leptopterna dol a brata, whether it is not a typo ...

13.09.2015 21:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Pterostichus oblongopunctatus. Rod is, kind of not.

13.09.2015 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Calvia decemguttata (Linnaeus 1758)

13.09.2015 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It will be easier.
Here: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/838167 need to add the form Anatis ocellata (Linnaeus, 1758) and move.
Then it'll be in openwork :)

13.09.2015 21:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Yeah, we kind of bugs I can not find :(

13.09.2015 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.09.2015 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago / Shamil Murtazin Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.09.2015 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago / Shamil Murtazin Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.09.2015 20:46, Peter Khramov:

Fix button.
As for the region's 40 - I have shown one view. Normal?

13.09.2015 20:39, Peter Khramov:

View will appear in the coming days. Together with other European, which is now lacking.

13.09.2015 20:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Cocoon some butterflies, from which the rider and went out.

13.09.2015 20:31, Shamil Murtazin:

I was unable to determine the rider on molbiole to species (http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133599&view=findpost&p=1499401). A copy is in the collection.

13.09.2015 20:19, Shamil Murtazin:

determined on molbiole - Jaguar paw (do not know the name)

13.09.2015 20:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Button does not work under the photo - "edit photo data." Clicking on it opens http://insecta.pro/usercab/usergallery and no pictures on the page.

13.09.2015 20:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Anthrenus picturatus definition Viktor Titov. View not found.

13.09.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Syrphini Eupeodes.

13.09.2015 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia lucifuga / Sergei Kotov Cucullia lactucae / Oleg Pekarsky.

13.09.2015 19:41, Oleg Pekarsky:

It Cucullia lactucae.

13.09.2015 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Clear. Other options are not visible, although Gluck with the authors and the truth is not clear. Rather, the problem at the source.

13.09.2015 19:28, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, I have all the rules. Came taxon name and / or reference to the result set, where everything is bad.
on the avatar which is peppered moth emerges, but only when you look from the original "Forum".
Here, too, I do not see anything like that. Alexander, here, too, throw a link to a specific page.

13.09.2015 19:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, about the kinds I remember just beetles do not understand. And the question was on a photo - whether those this kind.

13.09.2015 19:24, Shamil Murtazin:

http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/228599

13.09.2015 19:23, Peter Khramov:

Fixed. Still a time to remind you that comments that relate to the form, written on the page of the form, not on the page foty.

13.09.2015 19:19, Peter Khramov:

:--))

13.09.2015 19:18, Peter Khramov:

And where did you do this type in the database watching? To me, it is not there at all.

13.09.2015 19:18, Peter Khramov:

Realized what a mistake. Fixed for this and other taxa.

13.09.2015 19:14, Shamil Murtazin:

http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43130

13.09.2015 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Oleg, in comments to the fote enter this info and we can then move.

13.09.2015 19:07, Peter Khramov:

A first type of what?

13.09.2015 18:39, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eupeodes

13.09.2015 18:11, Shamil Murtazin:

Polydrusus (s. Str.) Tereticollis (DeGeer, 1775) - Definition photo Zabaluev Ilya
here at a zoo with tereticollis ...

13.09.2015 18:04, Oleg Pekarsky:

There lutsefuge another photo that instance remains.

13.09.2015 18:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Polydrusus (Eudipnus) mollis (Strom, 1768) - Definition photo Zabaluev Ilya.
Until kind - because there is no such type.
Peter, you've got nowhere when loading columns with lines not moved? For the second form of the name of the discoverer who does not fit the "common".
The site is onlyPolydrusus mollisDejean

13.09.2015 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Almost all long-horned beetles is one of the main differences between the sexes: the length of the antennae.

13.09.2015 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia lucifuga / Sergei Kotov Cucullia lactucae / Oleg Pekarsky.

13.09.2015 17:53, Ivan Tislenko:

Thank you! Ie the male mustache longer? I just about knew musk beetle.

13.09.2015 17:49, Oleg Pekarsky:

It Cucullia lactucae.

13.09.2015 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Along the length of the antennae. And the male looks thinner and poizyaschnee females will.
When the couple reach the hands lay out to make it visually clearer distinction.

13.09.2015 17:39, Ivan Tislenko:

Basil, but as a male from the female of the barbel distinguish?

13.09.2015 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, you're right. Type of indeed even Linnaeus described back in 1758 and from here come from Wolfrum, 1953 is unclear.
Peter must be corrected))

13.09.2015 17:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Incidentally, this is the most frequent comment =)

13.09.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.09.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.09.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.09.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then, without question. My brother and verbs :)

13.09.2015 17:31, Shamil Murtazin:

I've kind of written as Platystomos albinus (Linnaeus, 1758)
I somehow messed up here on the site or species is not entirely true Set? ..

13.09.2015 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ptinidae / Imago / Shamil Murtazin Ptinus / Male / Ivan Stogov.

13.09.2015 17:31, Ivan Tislenko:

http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/139905

13.09.2015 17:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

It does not work directory for the sample random taxon.

13.09.2015 17:27, Peter Khramov:

What mils.

13.09.2015 17:27, Peter Khramov:

Verbs that Ptinus (Cyphoderes) sp. male: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133597&st=21600&p=1480651#entry1480651

13.09.2015 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Typically, this time already, now this should not be. Throw off the link to the specific form that has left Linné.

13.09.2015 17:08, Ivan Tislenko:

I decided to ask here, though it was not on. Why is Linnaeus named the species descriptions in the Linné, the Linnaeus?

13.09.2015 16:57, Shamil Murtazin:

I was determined not. Someone - probably have not found, but recorded in the notebook itself. Maybe there exists in the vast molbiola =)

13.09.2015 16:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calophasia lunula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2015 16:27, Peter Khramov:

Basil, all narmul, all have agreed on everything, know the problem.

13.09.2015 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For information: all types, which I will now load for a long time and correctly identified. I can not afford to load uncertain at that moment, when the site goes break in. In addition, thus it reveals what is not in the database (write in comments).
Therefore, it is better not to get involved here :)

13.09.2015 15:59, Peter Khramov:

Well, I say ....
I'm in plain text seems to be written - I do not need to say anything, everything has long been discussed, what once again from an empty but in a net.
Crooked legislation in this case (as well as in all) (((
Firstly, it is in this case curved. In the repeat, in all its curves, too, can not be named. Do not simplify. From an ethical point of view, it will look ugly in relation to the author.
There will not. Too long ago to grind all, including and authors.
Who knows but himself that he wanted to show this photo? No ....
If there are any special things that the author wants to show he is writing about it in a note.And if for them, no one knows what the price it worthless.
Maybe he wanted to show the variability of sex? As I once here: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/38912
Maybe. Just to show it in the framework of the gallery on one fote - wrong. As part of the gallery is to do on the individual fotah, if desired - with comments. We do not live in the book.Many times I repeat: it is not a window dressing siyumitnoy something rastakaya under the current features of the site. The fact gramtnom making information that can then be distributed on the shelves. The point is not to show demorfizm one species in book illustration and be immensely happy about this.The point is to seal the basis for a comfortable display demorfizma from a variety of species such as this only interfere foty (compared to the situation where a male and female would be exposed separately).
In my view these photos, which shows both sexes must not touch in any case.
And I think all of them should be changed to separate.Do not just change for technical reasons.

For all: trying to ship as much as possible a collector's item on fote. All information and a comparison should be carried out only between different fotami only software. Any questions / suggestions - write.

13.09.2015 15:50, Irina Nikulina:

Understood) Thank you, it works.

13.09.2015 15:47, Peter Khramov:

There is a bug now that the phot may be in a well-defined, but without reference to the form. That Alexander and rules. Although in your case, it is really best left as it is, to then quickly it all from admin to catch and send to the species.

13.09.2015 15:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, what was it? What is the meaning of transport?
That I'm just so species that are not found in the base casting to the admin panel, then to make it convenient to move into place.
Help is there: http://www.zin.ru/aNIMAliA/Coleoptera/rus/trich_ru.htm
Previously, he was cited as an MO O. eremita. But that was long ago and not true.
Please do not interfere.

13.09.2015 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, what I say ....
Distorting the law in this case (as well as in all) (((
From an ethical point of view, it will look ugly in relation to the author.
Who knows but himself that he wanted to show this photo? No one....
Maybe he wanted to show the variability of sex? As I once here: http: // insecta.pro / ru / gallery / 38912
In my view these photos, which shows both sexes must not touch in any case.

13.09.2015 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subspecies Gnorimus nobilis bolshakovi Gusakov, 2002 has been recently described from the isolated from the main range of the species population in the Tula region of Russia.
Where, in fact, and the male and female.

13.09.2015 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Irina, at this stage, "temporarily" is already almost gone. Ie temporarily, for example, does not plow the English version and temporarily lacks something any species that will soon be added to the curators and temporarily not add yourself taxa.But such glitches as you indicated, this is the bugs, they may appear due to the fact that once there was a big update site, and not to all the corners I came with inspections. Therefore, (an appeal to all), just report them, and I'll fix it.
Regarding the gallery - corrected.

13.09.2015 14:52, Ivan Tislenko:

Uploaded bug defense counsel Peribalus strictus (Fabricius, 1803) http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43109
Tucson has not been found and synonyms Cimex strictus Holcostethus strictus too.
It is the base taxa incomplete?
P.S. Already answered, thank you!

13.09.2015 14:51, Peter Khramov:

Ivan, one of these days is a pretty big addition to the forms on the site, including and this will then tie your photos to it.

13.09.2015 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Point may be. Regarding the right - I already explained everything in the phone and TZ the legislation of the Russian Federation, and with TZ concepts. In such cases we must first seek the consent.
Who is interested in the rights of authors in the photo as part of this site - all issues to me.
And share this photo is not going purely for technical reasons.

13.09.2015 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

13.09.2015 14:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Osmoderma barnabita Motschulsky, 1845

13.09.2015 14:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Osmoderma barnabita Motschulsky, 1845

13.09.2015 14:22, Ivan Tislenko:

Uploaded cow Halyzia sedecimguttata (Linnaeus, 1758) http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43106
I did not find this taxon - no kind of any kind. Synonyms do not know.
In view of this one makroide http://macroid.ru/showgallery.php?cat=1330, on the site of the Zoological Institute, he also has http://www.zin.ru/aNIMAliA/Coleoptera/rus/halsedwa.htm

13.09.2015 14:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, this image is already in admin yesterday overlooked (
It's definitely a male Igor Chalcosoma caucasus (Fabricius, 1801)
Well, I say ....... We must do types: already start to grow little by little. I hope that in the near future will scatter them where it is necessary :)

13.09.2015 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Especially without the author's consent to split (divide) photos can not. It will not be easy editing and split the author intended the composition to which it has the appropriate rights) In such cases, we must first seek the consent of his.
Let it be as it is.

13.09.2015 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.09.2015 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.09.2015 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Aphomia_Foedella

13.09.2015 13:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

What for? let it be as it is, from 3000, is history. :).

13.09.2015 13:44, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, for the selection of the comments thank you very much) One more question - is not working on a specific selection of photos and detachment particular photo. For example, I want to see only the butterflies set Yura Semeykin, without rest, for the moment I'm not interested, I type in the parameters of selection [1] Lepidoptera [detachment] in photography respectively. Semeykina.There are no results, empty. This is temporary?

13.09.2015 13:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Here instance is dead, but he was frozen, so the resemblance to a living almost wholly-owned (state of the eye is not visible, everything else should be OK).

13.09.2015 13:14, Shamil Murtazin:

Share the photo should be? ..

13.09.2015 12:53, Irina Nikulina:

In the Russian Far East subspecies Cerura erminea candida (Staudinger, 1892) - that the following 4 photo. (To insects of the Russian Far East, v.5, ch. 3, str537) It is necessary to make a subspecies of the page type.

13.09.2015 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the words of several collectors butterfly is common in Primorye and the male the species is active during the day, and the female flies at night, the light (ie active at night).
Hence my question to our Far Eastern comrades :)
How dedicated my information is correct, and if it is, give the description of a species or not?

13.09.2015 8:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

It does not work in the sample directory. You can not search for old Comostola for 40 regions of Russia. the result of 0, and it is wrong.

13.09.2015 8:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Comostola subtiliaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.09.2015 8:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, in this post:
13.09.2015 7:58 Vasiliy Feoktistov, Lemonia taraxaci
on the avatar which is peppered moth emerges, but only when you look from the original "Forum" .

13.09.2015 8:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, like all works, thank you, just yet unusual. A little exercise, see how we can improve this process. :))

13.09.2015 3:05, Peter Khramov:

Oleg, now in this section, so very little, so that no problems can unsubscribe here. Vaughn, Paul writes all messages to Insectoids on molbiole rather than insects: -) The big problems begin when the section will be a lot. In the meantime, the problem will not be much larger. But there will be.Here such for example:
New user comes to the site and want to quickly get acquainted with the situation at the Forum / Community necessary for him taxon. For example, Noctuidae.
Or. Curator / Moderator wants to check whether all the user comments he treated in the same taxon Noctuidae.
Or. Not new, but some want the user has a desire to walk on the taxon.What is he doing? He goes to the comments section to taxa, there Noctuidae enters and receives a sample of comments is on this taxon (and all subsidiaries). It looks like this: http://insecta.pro/ru/community/taxons?tx=[88]+Noctuidae++[%D0%A1%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%BE]
Hooray. All quickly and easily. Only your message out classifications will not be there.And it was there and it was sounded in the above situations, they will be interesting and useful. It was then in connection with moderators / curators is something I can take (even if in the overall tape they crawled away down).
Binding of all that is possible, to the common base taxa - one of the most important facilities in the work with this website.Bo as comments, point, phot, etc. not just hangs on a certain page, and fit to the tree taxa, and find it becomes much faster, and in itself it is noticeable, and her move to the adjacent / similar essences become much easier.

13.09.2015 2:55, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, comments on the selection of taxa ready.

13.09.2015 2:55, Peter Khramov:

Improvements in the Forum / Community:
1. Now in sections Comments to the species and other taxa, and Picture comments can select comments taxon .
For example. We are not interested beetles, we are interested only butterflies.Enter in the appropriate box, Lepidoptera, triggered autosubstitution, click "Select comments taxon" and voila: feed for comments before us only the order Lepidoptera and all of its subsidiaries taxa. Or. We are interested not only butterflies, but all and all, but right now we would like to see only comments to the genus Papilio. Enter Papilio, and then voila.No need to crawl on to some other sections, subsections, and other artificial divisions of the forum and to wade through piles of uninteresting to you here and now information. Just enter the name of the taxon, and see only comments for photos or taxa that are of interest to you.I recall that the same functionality (limit taxon of subgenus and above) is available in Gallery , and Catalog .
2. In the above mentioned sections of the opportunity to hide official comments (ph transfer, formalization signs, etc.) This feature was previously available only in the total tape recent comments .
3.To treat a glitch when the Community for comments taxa could not show previews illustration target taxa.

13.09.2015 0:32, Peter Khramov:

With regard to European species - seems to have found another spelling. How to run the addition of species - the request is not to add the European (not counting the butterflies), but exotic. For Europe, recently made another centralized updating again.

13.09.2015 0:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Helophilus Helophilus affinis.

12.09.2015 23:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

Helophilus affinis

12.09.2015 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my opinion, too, is nothing more than the "collector's item" does not fit.
Yet in some cases, you may need "Side view" or "profile view" (your choice) :)
For example: male rhinoceros beetles (Dynastinae) is often required to show in this view to be seen horns on his head and pronotum they are more visible eye once again on the side.

12.09.2015 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, like no other words. Tady put up with it :)

12.09.2015 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, right now until they bear little :)
And what about the instance of the entomological collection in this you are right. You've got to think. The truth is nothing else comes to mind (

12.09.2015 22:26, Peter Khramov:

Basil, change the terminology - it is a short (if they take me). But then affix angles to pile on truck - is longer. So that puts immediately and replace the terms, do not worry.
As for the instance of the entomological collection - in four words of this length, kanesh can be anything you want to record. Brevity is necessary to indicate brevity.

12.09.2015 22:24, Peter Khramov:

Well, all the rules. Bananas - Bananas in context. For example, when I'm talking about trivial in the context of lack of taxa in the base - do not mean the exotic species that are only found out yesterday and figs where they were published, and the European, for example, an antiquity that even Linnaeus rake outlined. And the whole business.If there is another word that more accurately conveys the essence - Ghawar!

12.09.2015 22:19, Peter Khramov:

OK. If you do write in the notes to replace any ph, then will leave the old rooms and all comments.

12.09.2015 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here, too, it is necessary to turn the hands.
More can help capture the geography.

12.09.2015 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Chalcosoma / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.09.2015 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Chalcosoma / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.09.2015 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Prior to the form of photos of these comrades to determine very problematic (

12.09.2015 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Dorcus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.09.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Briefly.
Under the "banal" in the insect I understand the normal and the teeth on edge all along the area.
The example in the beetles. Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763) : http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43026
View can be called "banal" when assembled somewhere in the Ukraine or Moldova, but not in the Moscow region. Russia.
Our view is quite rare, and all points of the findings necessarily mapped with the words of Professor.Nikitsky NB
Yes, and I'm on to a forest crawling with children. This forty-plus years. Izlazil the forest and down, sanded, figuratively speaking, "not a single hectare of" dead, dead trees, and only a year ago found numerous populations :)
And I do not dare call it "banal" ...Unfortunately, many, if somewhere a kind of insect found in a mass, start to yell: "That, they say, a banana!" (((
I was such an approach very strongly warps.

12.09.2015 20:59, Igor Ivannikov:

I will try to change, but tomorrow

12.09.2015 20:56, Peter Khramov:

Keep.

12.09.2015 20:48, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Igor that picture something so small ??? Just wanted to admire the handsome beetle, not a bit of it ....

12.09.2015 19:14, Igor Ivannikov:

In 1976 he received a gift from a collector. As you can see, I went ... :-)

12.09.2015 18:31, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eristalinus arvorum

12.09.2015 16:59, Fedor Ovechkin:

Dolichopodidae

12.09.2015 15:20, Fedor Ovechkin:

Very similar instances;
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=463359

12.09.2015 12:03, Oleg Pekarsky:

If used without the name of the species kinds, then with the title - Atalanta butterfly or a butterfly Proserpine. In combination with the generic, with a small - Vanessa Atalanta. Raza there?

12.09.2015 11:47, Peter Khramov:

On the other hand, in the Russian names of all the letters should be fine Well, as I of CD ...

12.09.2015 11:37, Peter Khramov:

Let's wait for an explanation! Until now. Banal. banal. banal. Banal. Banal. corny!

12.09.2015 11:30, Oleg Pekarsky:

And I wanted to show the photos Frosya wide range of readers:) By the way proper name is spelled with a capital letter.

12.09.2015 11:27, Oleg Pekarsky:

Peter, I'll create here 2-3 threads on the shovel.
What would end up with Schrankia, I cite the name of the work published this year with a description of the two species from Hawaii.
MATTHEW J MEDEIROS 2015 Two new endemic Hawai'ian Lepidoptera: a new species of Pseudoschrankia (Erebidae) from O'ahu, and a new species of Thyrocopa (Xyloryctidae) from Moloka'i Zootaxa 3990 (4): 593-597.
Actually it's all on Schrankia at the moment.

12.09.2015 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S.
With regard to the species for the essay beetles otpishu later. Who is going to the Congress and, therefore, no time.
And let's still refrain from using the word "banal" in the insect.
I can explain later why it grates me :)

12.09.2015 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Eristalinus.

12.09.2015 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Helophilus.

12.09.2015 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Eristalis.

12.09.2015 5:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Eristalis.

12.09.2015 5:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter vskidku questions that have been raised:
Rogachev no large genus: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42927
The barbel is not the whole tribe: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42805
I know where to add someone to add. Added-to myself, but there is no way (

11.09.2015 23:40, Peter Khramov:

Oleg, thanks for the info, very correct initiative. Pay attention that on this site can leave comments on the pages of taxa. Ie for Schrankia - here: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/1317. This is not the forum, there are more opportunities. With regards to the same section Sistema.Klassifikatsiya, it is likely to discuss options for a global classification, etc.Although people kanesh uses it differently. Bo used to a limited forumnym organization.

11.09.2015 23:34, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eristaliini

11.09.2015 23:30, Fedor Ovechkin:

Helophilus

11.09.2015 23:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter is very necessary that the site would be structured, and now it turns out porridge. and that's what people are used to clearly changed for the worse. Plus do not visible, especially babochnikov. :) Miss this moment, people will leave the site.

11.09.2015 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, on the selection and tapes community has work to sections of taxa - yes, it's right, I'll do it. But it can not turn quickly, it is more difficult situation than with a gallery there.

11.09.2015 23:16, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eristalis

11.09.2015 23:16, Fedor Ovechkin:

Eristalis

11.09.2015 23:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Syrphidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov Syrphini / Fedor Ovechkin.

11.09.2015 23:04, Peter Khramov:

And there is not a race where a species (or higher) and at the same time this race is quite a banal? And further. Otpishu suggestions for topics for the essay in the species of beetles. Ie for butterflies in our time of flight of the lifetime of the caterpillars, feed plants, etc. And for beetles what changes?

11.09.2015 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

11.09.2015 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tatiana Selena Eugene Karolinskiy.

11.09.2015 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vanessa atalanta Vanessa indica.

11.09.2015 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

11.09.2015 23:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vanessa atalanta / Tatiana Selena Vanessa indica / Eugene Karolinskiy.

11.09.2015 22:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

V. indica

11.09.2015 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With the "Spanish fly" everything is normal :)

11.09.2015 21:58, Fedor Ovechkin:

Syrphini

11.09.2015 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reset.

11.09.2015 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He looked.
As is now missing species (Palaearctic) should be added:
In Rhode Boros: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/840689
1 views: Boros schneideri (Panzer, 1795)
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/boridae.htm
In Rhode Pytho: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/840698
2 types: Pytho depressus (Ljnnaeus, 1767); Pytho kolwensis Sahlberg, 1833
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/atl_py.htm
In Rhode Cucujus: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/837312
2 types: Cucujus haematodes Erichson, 1845; Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763)
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/atl_cj.htm
In these kinds of little labor and I think anything else except these then add will not have to.

11.09.2015 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Normalyuno. The most that :)

11.09.2015 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

11.09.2015 21:01, Peter Khramov:

Now instead of "tracks" everywhere should be spelled "larva" (Change). If there is still overlooked for this case - reported.

11.09.2015 20:59, Peter Khramov:

Here, if you look http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/43038 I have ever seen. To begin with, it can turn out en masse poreshat problem with the lack of species to add something really rare, not spend plenty of time to add heap banal.

11.09.2015 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do bedbugs larva called a nymph, butterflies, caterpillar, and in essence it is still a larva.
Just due to the expansion of scope of the site should be the "caterpillar" was renamed "larva": this is universal for all insects, including butterflies and bugs.

11.09.2015 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Okay, everything passed stage. Just a working discussion ....
Peter, can not wait on the 14th, when it will be possible to add taxa. System to start working and will continue to grind :)
Beetles still have captured and loaded into the admin does not want. And it is only load what sfotat earlier and there in a computer (sometimes only the underside dosnimali for some).And this is only a small fraction of what is in the collection and must be loaded. Most would :)

11.09.2015 20:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Oh, but I still wanted a good picture of Frosya see =)

11.09.2015 20:33, Peter Khramov:

There unseemly to ask any questions if the answer is not obvious to them. I told you, I also nocheviden. Therefore, I wonder what you got against. And they asked you about this quite correctly, without any emotional coloring. Coating then went after the answer ...

11.09.2015 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Once again, these issues from Modera on entomological resource I just put out. They are asking all worthless.
And underside is needed not only for the beetles and butterflies, as well as possible for everyone without exception insects.
If I have the opportunity to download the underside - I'm sure it will load.Even if the insect is determined not only on the underside.
Otherwise, users of the site will receive an incomplete visual picture of the insect.
The more angles - the better.
For example here: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42932 to bring to the kind I just lacks one angle. The truth is not underside and the top, but without in any way: there is a similar pattern to the types of lots.

11.09.2015 20:00, Peter Khramov:

But why this question is irrelevant? Well, there are no two identical underside, so what? I am now quite obvious, necessary for beetles underside or not. And Alexander asked quite normal.

11.09.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then, let us refrain from such (completely inappropriate) questions: "Why do the bottom, there's, there are signs of Identification?"
I confess got excited and it is the base:
Moderator on the resource with entomological bias generally worthless to ask such questions.Any person in one way or another connected with entomology well aware that two identical underside (and top) of the insect does not happen. Even if these insects belong to the same species.
Let's still try not to provoke each other.

11.09.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pachnoda marginata Pachnoda marginata peregrina.

11.09.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pachnoda marginata Pachnoda marginata peregrina.

11.09.2015 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Moustache, original range, which stretches from the mountains of Tajikistan to the shores of the Pacific Ocean" (NN Plavilshchikov 1940).
In view of the Moscow region is relatively recent migrants as an introduction to the timber and successfully acclimated.
So insects are expanding their range :)

11.09.2015 19:21, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by the interim results of the discussion on the page adjacent foty from the same individual.

11.09.2015 19:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Autographa nigrisigna / Yuri Semejkin Ctenoplusia agnata / Irina Nikulina.

11.09.2015 19:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Autographa nigrisigna / Yuri Semejkin Ctenoplusia agnata / Irina Nikulina.

11.09.2015 19:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Larva ..... Here butterflies caterpillars eat and what to do with the larvae of bugs, create a field after the imago larva? Or dump larvae in general, I do not know they are generally determined or not.

11.09.2015 19:20, Peter Khramov:

If the response was adequate to the situation, and the discussion was not. I asked many times to look at the situation Shirshov, not only on the principle of "the fool" ...

11.09.2015 19:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Carry. . Kohl majority. And then I will add the opinion of specialists, but probably it will be the same.

11.09.2015 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Maybe it has to move, just one more opinion for? In extreme cases, it will be possible to deploy. Even now it is not hanging in uncertain.

11.09.2015 19:06, Peter Khramov:

Throw me in the system area examples in Europe and see what went wrong. Maybe, again, like the last time on a smaller scale (most taxa were incorrectly removed in compiling the information from various sources, than they did not exist).

11.09.2015 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eulichas robusta Hájek, 2009
Sem. Eulichadidae is on the site. It is necessary to add a born Eulichas Jacobson, 1913 and accordingly this type.
These beetles are known for their "amphibian" larvae live in water, but adults of the Land. Very interesting for bugs :)

11.09.2015 17:19, Yuri Semejkin:

As it is not found in the internet pictures which are clearly visible age-related changes. Even the tracks sliznevidok sometimes not seem to speak confidently to whom they refer. (Maybe someone knows where there are normal pictures, it is desirable to all ages, so throw a reference).
For this reason, I decided to add another caterpillar. Here, in comparison with http: // insecta.pro / ru / gallery / 42923 it for 2 days older than the median strip and its clearly expressed acquired a reddish-orange color. Apparently this is the last age, and it is a matter for pupation .....

11.09.2015 16:29, Oleg Pekarsky:

To sort Schrankia has published a comprehensive list of known species - Pekarsky O (2012) A new species of Schrankia Hübner, 1825 from China (Lepidoptera, Erebidae,
Hypenodinae). ZooKeys 242: 43-50. doi: 10.3897 / zookeys.242.3856

11.09.2015 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it's me after the fact.
We must find the Nearctic and Neotropics - taxa in the database is.
And it is necessary Palearctic or Indo-Australia - not always. It comes to the fact that not even the most famous species.
In short: "Roulette" (

11.09.2015 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Option 2 is excellent. :)

11.09.2015 16:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Side view

11.09.2015 15:59, Oleg Pekarsky:

There are two ways: 1 on my list next to each species and subspecies of the source is. 2. I'll publish a description of the new stenoloby in this publication will give a list of all currently known species and then we can only refer to this source:)

11.09.2015 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Oleg usually when loading a new species to the database, specify the source of the "Literature" only room for it in the "Literature" First you need to place the source, and then add views . That's the chemistry. :)

11.09.2015 15:54, Oleg Pekarsky:

J. Donald Lafontaine, B. Christian Schmidt 2010 Annotated check list of the Noctuoidea (Insecta, Lepidoptera) of North America north of Mexico.
The article is easy to take the online magazine Zookeys

11.09.2015 15:46, Peter Khramov:

Oh, where to take the "American taxa set" ... overseas brothers immediately popribavilos site would ...

11.09.2015 15:42, Oleg Pekarsky:

Alexander, well, eventually you'll make and send. Sources - publications of different years, starting with a revision of the genus in two parts, 2000 and 2001, Kononenko and Ronkai. Can all of them provide.

11.09.2015 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pytho depressus (Linnaeus, 1767) must be added the known species.
Today stop clutter admin precisely defined views.
I look forward to adding types :)
And the American set of taxa, while in Europe to work uncomfortable.

11.09.2015 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Boros schneideri (Panzer, 1795)
Palearctic representative probably the world's smallest family of beetles Zinovsky version: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/boridae.htm
It is necessary to add the form.

11.09.2015 15:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

11.09.2015 15:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Oleg, the list is very good, it is still necessary to the literary source or online resource, where to get information. Can you throw me a mail, I will be very grateful when ustakanetsya relocation site add species.

11.09.2015 15:02, Oleg Pekarsky:

List Stenoloba site contains 15 species, and in 2013 they were 75. Since then, several species described, so that now there are more 80ti. I can provide a list for inclusion in the database.

11.09.2015 14:48, Oleg Pekarsky:

Understood thanks.

11.09.2015 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is another photo of a butterfly with photos 42590, in the top right corner of the section "Other photos of the same individual"

11.09.2015 14:28, Oleg Pekarsky:

is not Autographa nigrisigna

11.09.2015 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This photo The underside is replaced by another top photo copies. which is located at the bottom of the page type.

11.09.2015 13:35, Oleg Pekarsky:

It Ctenoplusia agnata.

11.09.2015 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina well. I once again today going to man up some brozovok underside and comment on the pages whose underside is. There's my all cases, one photo per page view. I think everything will be clear)

11.09.2015 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not try to be clever. Just I have the right to have its position in those matters which have a certain competence and constant here I know better what to put and what not. And I think inappropriate questions about "why do underside" is useless. Hence, adequate answers.

11.09.2015 13:15, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Anomala grandis - so they can be there to collect buckets .... called banana beetle .... near banana plantations were ....

11.09.2015 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.09.2015 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Updated.

11.09.2015 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Updated.

11.09.2015 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ochlodes ochracea / Yuri Semejkin Thymelicus sylvatica / Irina Nikulina.

11.09.2015 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ochlodes ochracea / Yuri Semejkin Thymelicus sylvatica / Irina Nikulina.

11.09.2015 12:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Sure!

11.09.2015 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Oleg Pekarsky.

11.09.2015 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

11.09.2015 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agrotis frosya Pekarsky, 2014

11.09.2015 12:08, Oleg Pekarsky:

Agrotis stenibergmanni raised to species in 2014. Who is online it as a subspecies militaris. Please fix it.

11.09.2015 12:02, Oleg Pekarsky:

Genus Agrotis somehow placed in the tribe Noctuini. It is necessary to move it to the tribe Agrotini.

11.09.2015 12:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.09.2015 11:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agreed, was somewhat flawed, but attempt to be clever, in other words not nazavesh, Basil frequently slips. I would be happy not to look, but the newsline total.
Peter, the classification is already divided.to share news feed , new galleries on the taxonomic groups, well, interesting to me to watch beetles and bugs and so many polzovatley lepdoptory.ru

11.09.2015 11:34, Peter Khramov:

Did.
Alexander, Basil, recall that the presence of emoticons in messages you do not always help, so let's get a little closer to what write, well, that someone from the modders where poumnichat - such messages between the moderators generally only in the system area or PUBLIC OUTSIDE elsewhere.Moderators do not have to always be willing and can be as much as necessary to argue with each other, but not in humans.

11.09.2015 11:16, Irina Nikulina:

Well, what about bronzovok uchtu. But it is better to remind when a new podgruzku underside where they need to add or replace them. If they are not the second, and the third, etc. Photo for the species in the LC need not illustrate the impact.Peter seems to kind of do not really illustrated when photos are placed, to certain subspecies, once more, and the third case emerged. We must do something.

11.09.2015 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

On the site, the two species identified by Irina all, so I went to look at the basics of aces. What can be seen on the back of the lower wings: at Ochlodes ochracea central vein M2 and M3 are connected by a bridge, at Thymelicus sylvatica as if they are from the center of the wing, without jumpers, what we see in the above photo.

11.09.2015 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For the collection of specimens of insects (butterflies not only) is desirable underside, and other angles if any.
Here is how the same bugs feature here: http://insectamo.ru/coleo/158-zhuki/cucujidae/2315-cucujus-cinnaberinus
And like to do in the future here.

11.09.2015 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just as surely, and now this: http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/182601
I otdli probably 50 pieces (nowhere to go) :)

11.09.2015 10:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Beetle on Borneo extremely banal. And in the jungles and major cities (including Kota Kinabalu). While drinking beer on the beach caught more than 30 units (with 3 color forms)

11.09.2015 10:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In fact, there are features. At the bottom of it differs from the closely related species Cucujus haematodes Erichson, 1845 , which has a theoretical MO and kotorgo I do not have in the collection.

11.09.2015 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #43025 group.

11.09.2015 10:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

It should be linked with the # 43025

11.09.2015 10:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Again Lepidiota stigma

11.09.2015 9:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why do the bottom, there's, there are signs of Identification?

11.09.2015 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cucujus cinnaberinus (Scopoli, 1763)

11.09.2015 7:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, Yuri, asked more proof does not hurt, but I can think of at least five signs, the differences between the two species that favor Ctenoplusia agnata. But just say, other species I had not considered. Maybe something third :)

11.09.2015 5:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same story (to subspecies): http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/193845
Nominative, unfortunately, I do not.
Irina and Peter. I will be to you a little about bronzovok recommendation.
They are best illustrated by placing the top and underside photo (if available).
For those bronzovok, which I downloaded to date I will load underside from time to time where it is needed.The thing is that in many species bronzovok mesothorax process is an important feature of (the beetles are beautiful, but it is rather difficult in certain groups).
If you need to, then I can explain it, where "what is eaten" by the example of two of our most common species that people are often confused with each other :)

11.09.2015 5:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.09.2015 5:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He is :)
Rod and accordingly species not in the database. As long as we do not touch.

11.09.2015 1:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! Let's do so. I threw this butterfly Kononenko, but it is not there. If he does not appear, in the coming days I will send mats. (As soon as he finished a vacation). I think after 5 days the answer would be, and then determine where she was to be.

11.09.2015 1:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Well Basil!

11.09.2015 0:27, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, another type appeared, a page that can not be illustrated, though the photo is already - http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/140294. This is in addition to the http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23116, which has already written 5.09. And in both cases the pictures uploaded to the definition subsp. Luke I both references to these non-illustrated species are absent.

10.09.2015 23:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lepidiota stigma

10.09.2015 23:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Even I know- Lepidiota stigma

10.09.2015 23:05, Svetlana Shchavelina:

This beetle was in the same place and at the same time as # 43021
But its color is much lighter, it does not effect anything was (like flash or post-processing).

10.09.2015 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Fedor Ovechkin Syrphidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2015 22:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Butterfly pretty fresh. Closely watched two types. First, in literature Kononenko "Scoops of Siberia" and the catalog Witt "Scoops Palearctic". Then the Internet. Everything speaks in favor Ctenoplusia agnata, and online http://catocala.narod.ru/noc307.html same error is shown Ctenoplusia agnata, and written Autographa nigrisigna. We will not multiply the error.Yuri, if you're looking at this site, it is identified correctly, this is the same butterfly, just on the site, in my opinion, it is not defined correctly.

10.09.2015 21:29, Fedor Ovechkin:

Syrphidae

10.09.2015 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dorcus parallelipipedus (Linnaeus, 1758) (the definition of the other three in the comment of the author)
C Rogachev I see is all too bad, even if there is no such common species.

10.09.2015 21:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I apologize, it is not immediately understood. :)

10.09.2015 21:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Yuri Semejkin.

10.09.2015 20:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parasa sinica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2015 19:53, Irina Nikulina:

Peter and the double dog is not working? Something did not work in the form of comments highlight. And the former (at least recently used) recovering disappeared.

10.09.2015 19:50, Irina Nikulina:

Only now it's probably the kind ofParasa sinica. In Sinev kind hilarula not, on the site too. But caterpillars sinica just such http://www.weblio.jp/content/Parasa+sinica
http://www.jpmoth.org/Limacodidae/Limacodinae/Parasa_sinica.html

10.09.2015 19:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lepidoptera / Robot Clepsis pallidana / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.09.2015 19:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agapeta hamana / Nikolay Grebennikov Clepsis pallidana / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.09.2015 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Forms are written in the author's comments. Rod still need to add :)

10.09.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, this is only one race (the other) and add any kind of taxa is no possibility (
All photos at startup which was filled with the string The name of the taxon under our control, and at the first opportunity will be in the types without comment))

10.09.2015 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Dry instance" , grates, definitely (
Appropriate and louder is: "instance of the Entomological Collection" :)
So is (already wrote about this): for bugs me greatly warps affix attributes: "The top of the wings" and "The underside (bottom wing)" . Therefore, they do not put.
It is necessary to reduce to just: "Top" and "underside" , and without it the wings :)

10.09.2015 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera Asilidae.

10.09.2015 16:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Calvia decemguttata ( Linnaeus , 1767)

10.09.2015 11:12, Fedor Ovechkin:

Asilidae

10.09.2015 8:48, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, I ordered the number of species to show that, overall, the number offhand, significant and to explain the reasons why this or that species on the site can still be found. Now the classification bugs mainly of ITIS and Sp2000 plus Evropea Fauna and so on. In other words, it is a hybrid option (as for most other taxa).Can we rely on thee, said the book - I have not, and I'm not big bugs specialist.
New species (in non-global amounts) will be added after the 14th of September. If something is missing in the global - reported. Globally there - at least 1,000 species in the taxon.

10.09.2015 8:38, Peter Khramov:

Your choice? Collection?

10.09.2015 8:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dry ekzemplyar- you not bothered ???

10.09.2015 0:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Pachnoda savignyi / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2015 0:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Eudicella gralli / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2015 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lucanus cervus (Linnaeus, 1758)

10.09.2015 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And this, too, the Chinese need to add :)
Lucanus laetus Arrow, 1943

10.09.2015 0:05, Elena Ivannikova: This species is identified correctly.

10.09.2015 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lucanus cervus (Linnaeus, 1758)

09.09.2015 23:56, Peter Khramov:

Her: -) This is the point additives such will go after the 14th.

09.09.2015 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rhode Odontolabis Hope, 1842 First, add (in the comments to an adjacent photo) :)
Generally it is difficult to determine the nature of their (race hefty and commercial).
At the very foty pair of species is precisely defined - waiting in the wings :)

09.09.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

2 suffered last. You can illustrate the types :)

09.09.2015 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Farther! Farther!

09.09.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For the third time already "to move" closer to the definition of truth. This is the last time. Not anymore. Vacationers. Tired :)

09.09.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Scarabaeoidea / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Scarabaeoidea / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Cerambycidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Cerambycidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Cerambycidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Cerambycidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Added by genus, species, subspecies and beetles ~ 5600 taxa. You can transfer the newly added foty.

09.09.2015 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Rutelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Rutelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Taeniodera tricolor (Mohnike, 1873) The latest at the current point in time :)

09.09.2015 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hoplopyga ocellata (Gory & Percheron, 1833) on the control in the admin panel :)

09.09.2015 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hoplopyga liturata (Olivier, 1789) in the admin.

09.09.2015 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hoplopyga marginesignata (Gory & Percheron, 1833) is not kind. In the admin.

09.09.2015 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pachnoda savigny savigny (Gory & Percheron, 1833) in the admin, under control.

09.09.2015 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subspecies Pachnoda marginata peregrina Kolbe, 1906 No extensive African race. In the admin.

09.09.2015 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

View Eudicella gralii Buquet, 1836 Missing race. I put the admin area until better times.

09.09.2015 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put just a series of species in order to show the variability :)

09.09.2015 20:35, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Beetle flew at night on the porch, knocked on the burning lamp, plopped down on her food. Remains of food - on his head, sorry, that's what we have turned so dirty ....

09.09.2015 20:27, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Beetle is small, only a few millimeters in sinus pepper.

09.09.2015 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Anoplophora / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Anoplophora / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Done, you can add the Old sources.

09.09.2015 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.09.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.09.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Svetlana Shchavelina Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.09.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Rutelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Rutelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rhode Odontolabis Hope, 1842: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id308269/pos0,200/
Not based.

09.09.2015 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:16, Svetlana Shchavelina:

It scared me that he, lifting up his head as soon as the approaching object :)

09.09.2015 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Orthoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Acrididae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Orthoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Acrididae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, now tried to add two sources:
http://www.cerambycoidea.com/ and http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/index.htm
It did not happen: does not work when you try to add autosubstitution of information from them (
Please do something. These sources - "a necessity" when working with the bugs :)

09.09.2015 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

An overlap of comments and because of that transfer fell off. It turned out for the better.
On the basis of comments by Yuri better not touch it :)

09.09.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whew ... to minimize this page. At the moment, there are my two certain barbel that keeps on controlling person (waiting places taxa). And a certain definition and waiting for confirmation Far Moth.
To be honest - pretty tired ((.Therefore, I support the request of Peter's statement at least once to any taxon if you think on it, and if it is in the database. And then - face it.
Now the site just expanded. Correspondingly and "overgrown" was like a rocket.
P.S. Peter, there are some species stuck in the admin. Its clear he did not.Then we shall understand: species appear more simply not in the database.

09.09.2015 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio / Vasiliy Feoktistov Papilio nephelus / Alex Dumchus.

09.09.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.09.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Rutelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Rutelidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tettigonioidea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicadidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicadidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cicadidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:17, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio nephelus

09.09.2015 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limacodidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Tend to version Parasa hilarula in the internet is a PDF file Sliznevidki Russia at the end of color illustrations. Paragraphs 10-11 kind of fit.

09.09.2015 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Membracidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Membracidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mantodea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acridoidea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acridoidea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acridoidea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Well Basil.

09.09.2015 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, I did not look in the park the author's comment. Fixed.
Jury if there are concerns about the taxon - it is better not to write them in the author's comments, and immediately put in a taxon (taxon if there is a basis of self-).
So everything will be easier :)

09.09.2015 18:01, Peter Khramov:

I remind you: in the past we have not had the opportunity to transfer photos supraspecific taxa and subspecies (transfers were only types), and now there is.
Concerning:
1.The request to the photographers: Startup (also while editing photos in the Personal Area), please indicate at least some taxa to which this image is (even at the level of the order or even higher).
2. Request to all: from time to time to go to the page http: // insecta.pro / ru / gallery? prec = 8 (a gallery with photos that are not assigned to any taxon, even to the order and higher) and to prescribe in the comments, "the definition of" at least to a high taxon.
3. Another request to all: how much is enough to walk through the pages of patience http://insecta.pro/gallery?sp=1 (a gallery with photos automatically translated into the "definition" to the order Lepidoptera, ie,those that were previously considered at all "undefined") and register in the commentary to the definition of a lower taxon.
Pp. 2 and 3 are needed for modernizing seeing your comments relevant foty moved to the specified (or lower) taxa.
4. Moderator: pp. 2 and 3 plus immediately transfer the photos to the taxa.

09.09.2015 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diptera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Tachinidae / Yuri Semejkin.

09.09.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tachinidae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

09.09.2015 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tachinidae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

09.09.2015 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Therevidae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

09.09.2015 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melolonthinae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Formicidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Formicidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lucanidae / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dynastidae / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dynastidae / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anomala grandis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 17:33, Yuri Semejkin:

I recorded when loading and not only that. Not poshlo.Vot wrote in the comments.

09.09.2015 17:18, Peter Khramov:

It does not work to the highest taxa. Ie Dipteru introduce, and it takes only foty, certain subsidiaries to Diptery taxa, but not until Diptery. Now everything is derived, including and "Diptera sp".

09.09.2015 17:15, Peter Khramov:

I'm not about that. I say, why Hybomitra write in the comments, not wilted him Fautua at startup or through LC?

09.09.2015 17:04, Peter Khramov:

To check the translations and display in the gallery of high-taxa.

09.09.2015 17:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diptera / Confidently identified / Petr Khramov.

09.09.2015 16:51, Peter Khramov:

The site is now 60,000 species of bugs plus synonyms and generic combinations (the latter is important to search for the catalog). Ie the total number of very good. I suspect that the lack of any species can be:
1. Due to insufficient study of synonyms
2.Because of Russian Far East and similar areas, for which traditionally is not much a lot of information in the Western sources.
To address these issues:
A) In the presence of the curator taxon - they either under his guidance
B) If not applicable to the curator - me or the rest of the world.

09.09.2015 16:28, Yuri Semejkin:

I would like to ask where classification bugs. From the directory where the determinants or more. And that is not all autosubstitution. And somebody else might say. There is a book. Vinokurov NN Kanyukova EV Golub VB 2010 Catalog poluzhёstkokrylyh insects (Rueukschzeukf) Asian part of Russia. Novosibirsk.Is it possible to navigate to it, or other accepted online. Classification?

09.09.2015 16:20, Irina Nikulina:

In the morning revered by criteria raspravki, I wondered what the relationship with my nocturnal fasting) and what has to Sasha beetles)) but did not have time to write, slowly, and now Peter had explained everything, thank you.I would only add that ignorance can neither doubt nor confirm the correct definitions NEbabochek) Therefore, a non-illustrated views of others. Detachments - it's just a lack of time, some added processing and night, alas, remain the same))

09.09.2015 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Lucanidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Svetlana Shchavelina Curculionidae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, with TZ the organization of the catalog - is the eternal pain.

09.09.2015 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apparently even in the case that it is also very rare.
I wish to remove in the future :)

09.09.2015 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well accustomed :)
But take note.
A qualifiers for life, "sausage": it is a known fact ....

09.09.2015 14:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Unfortunately Vasily Rosalia coelestis Semenov, 1911: I do not vstrechalas.Ya not really bugs removed.

09.09.2015 14:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male. He's such a nogasty unlike females.
Yesterday, all of the world's nogastogo beetle uploaded: http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/42790 :))

09.09.2015 14:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.09.2015 14:39, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Who would argue !!! Besides - zinger - it is healthy: it was extremely difficult to take such a moving nasekominu. :)

09.09.2015 14:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.09.2015 14:39, Peter Khramov:

It would be necessary to write a small joint work of ethno equipment and maintaining collections. The book, that is, and modern, but, firstly, it is largely based on those very Soviet (which limits in terms of equipment), and secondly, to put it mildly, is not available to all and not all need in this volume.

09.09.2015 14:37, Peter Khramov:

But what a handsome, with his feet something!

09.09.2015 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Instead of "a new classification of" propose to say so:
1. The classification used on the site
2. Information identifying the source.
Otherwise, someone will understand what, in general, we are, and someone will take it in the world there is a certain sacred "new" classification and some "old".

09.09.2015 14:36, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Crop the picture, and then do not make out: one leg :) :) :)

09.09.2015 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, what about the benefits of beetles, it is necessary, I think first of all ask those directly engaged in them)))
My version: page of the form should preferably have a photo of both sexes, regardless of where the photo: from nature or from collection :)
Although,Collectible pictures usually give more information about the appearance of the form rather than natural)
A infa have unfolded in any children's book of the Soviet period on registration of collections. The only trouble is that now went to a nation that he has never read the books, and everything "on the internet" (

09.09.2015 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Perhaps this is one of the most beautiful, revered and rare European longhorn beetles :)
I do not like Wikipedia, but despite this bring out the link because I think about the form that it reflects the most objective:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Альпийский_усач
to. Yuri Semeykin.You hour not found in your Primorye, Far Eastern jewel Rosalia coelestis Semenov, 1911 :
http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/rosco2si.htm?
If vstrachalas - the picture of this beautiful beetle would be extremely desirable and necessary site :)

09.09.2015 13:45, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, Alexander Irina waiting for confirmation definition DV butterflies, not bugs.
Question criteria raspravki beetles were not. There was a question, one advantage - have straightened or natural.
Although your infa also interesting and can be useful. Moreover, it would have on the public can be arranged.And if yes illustrated in detail, even in blozhik how to restart it.

09.09.2015 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aphrodisium (Aphrodisium) rufiventris Gressitt, 1940
Synonyms:
Aromia faldermannii subsp. rufiventris Gressitt, 1940 = Aromia (Tomentaromia) faldermanni subsp. rufiventris Gressitt, 1951 = Aromia rufiventris Breuning, 1956 = Aphrodisium (Aphrodisium) rufiventris Podaný, 1971
Also no view and it is necessary to add.

09.09.2015 12:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Pentatoma semiannulata

09.09.2015 12:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Urochela quadrinotata (Reuter)

09.09.2015 11:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Lelia decempunctata

09.09.2015 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

According to the new classification of pre-existing as a separate detachment of damselflies (lat. Homoptera) merged with a group of Hemiptera (lat. Hemiptera).

09.09.2015 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemiptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 11:20, Svetlana Shchavelina:

I'm sorry, but I can not even imagine to what IT can belong squad ..........

09.09.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coleoptera / Imago / Svetlana Shchavelina Gerania boscii / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Absolutely: "Gusanitsa" , too, must be renamed to a "Larva"

09.09.2015 9:21, Fedor Ovechkin:

And another stage of "Caterpillar" is now too awkward.

09.09.2015 8:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Svetlana, beetles Coleoptera or one unit - Coleoptera)))
Here, in the image appear to some tropical representative squad Orthoptera (lat. Orthoptera) superfamily of locusts (lat. Acridoidea).
Not undertake to carry as he himself know whether tropical Orthoptera (

09.09.2015 7:54, Svetlana Shchavelina:

God be with you ... a squad? .... I beetles do not know what their squad, not that grasshoppers ... I'm just a photographer, sorry ...

09.09.2015 7:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rare in the Moscow region, and my first view of his discovery)
As recently as last winter professor NB Nikita: http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/nikitsky.htm I was not interested, I collected this kind in the suburbs. I replied that there was not going to ....And suddenly this summer and collected and not just anywhere, but at the balcony))
Reported finding Nicholas B. and he replied that he have this kind is only collected in 2014 and also single)
These are interesting cases here are sometimes :)

09.09.2015 7:43, Fedor Ovechkin:

Of the new taxa displayed photo only identified to the species level, the example of Diptera tested.

09.09.2015 7:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Underside. To put daw "The underside (bottom wing)" I did not have :)
Well, what is the bottom of the wings?
Peter, in connection with the expansion of the site offers a jackdaw "The top of the wings" and "The underside (bottom wing)" renamed to simply "top" and "underside" and then the beetles and pr. jackdaws insects current name already awkward.

09.09.2015 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cheilosia Cheilosia nuda.

09.09.2015 5:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let me explain about raspravki beetles on a couple of examples.
And Alexander, in this case should not wait (no offense to him said) :))
In the case of bugs (unlike butterflies) official criteria raspravki does not exist.
1) It is considered that it is necessary to urge the beetles under the body of antennae and legs.This is done solely to save space in the box and in order not to accidentally broken off limbs.
Contrary to popular belief such raspravka is not any criterion.
2) It is often possible to see the beetles with wings on.This technique is sometimes used by traders Souvenirs for the product to be more attractive to the buyer.
It is generally among the most zhuchistov considered bad form.
And accordingly also no criteria raspravki not.
P.S.All beetles and a grasshopper that I downloaded recently identified is absolutely true and based on that these species can be illustrated by a photo.

09.09.2015 4:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Cheilosia nuda

09.09.2015 3:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Helophilus virgatus

09.09.2015 3:20, Yuri Semejkin:

How to watch it? I enter in the parameter selection for example Cunctochrysa, clicking and bring nothing, a blank page. Something wrong?

09.09.2015 3:12, Yuri Semejkin:

I looked at Peter. Luke shot there.

09.09.2015 2:43, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, and LK is not tied?

09.09.2015 2:43, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hybomitra.

09.09.2015 2:43, Peter Khramov:

Made by an arbitrary selection of the taxon in the gallery. On future plans to make another option for people with disabilities (ready reference for the most popular taxa), and free sampling (so that you can zapiminat sampling parameters and show (or not show) them to others).

09.09.2015 2:41, Peter Khramov:

So, in the gallery you can view individual photos only butterflies, but beetles, bees only just flies. And you can - only genus Papilio or just subfamily Myrmicinae. In general, be selected photo to any taxon from subgenus above. And all this in conjunction with other parameters (accuracy of the author, etc.)
Lost in the sea of ​​photons? We use a feature of the new.
Z.S. Selection arbitrary taxon catalog now starts with the subgenus (before the selection was in the catalog, starting with the family, and in the selection of the gallery did not exist).

09.09.2015 1:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Hybomitra sp

09.09.2015 1:15, Peter Khramov:

Corrected, thanks for the tip.

09.09.2015 1:10, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, do not give in to despair and even more dejected. Try it again, now everything should be ok and without year.

09.09.2015 0:59, Peter Khramov:

I think, as well as on the butterflies. Raspravka as the first (if phot normal). Neraspravka as the second (optional, but as a guide).

09.09.2015 0:59, Irina Nikulina:

Peter walked on a random ten-DV kinds - nowhere Distribution on regions of Russia.

09.09.2015 0:47, Peter Khramov:

Everything will be.

09.09.2015 0:46, Peter Khramov:

Svetlana, if the species is not known, write at least a detachment, OK? Shtob people can find and identify.

09.09.2015 0:43, Irina Nikulina:

Forms illustrated, but it is necessary to consult NEbabochkam, which give preference to the presence of high-quality straightened - them or photo in nature? One view of the butterflies are not illustrated, there are DV and I still doubt the correctness of the determination. I am waiting for Sasha.

09.09.2015 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I can not make source: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/
Due to the fact that there is no publication year.
A source at the moment of the tropics relevant (if not the date). Depressing ...

09.09.2015 0:18, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, there's a list, with all of these types (I'm talking about butterflies) I have illustrated above, but click on the link - and the throws not to the page type, as before, but on all the photos.Now it will be? It is necessary to re-illustrate these species? (Poprobovala- okay)
Yes, Peter, and as described above with duplication glitch species and the disappearance of a photo gallery on the page of such species - already 20 such species caught. Most have not yet checked.

09.09.2015 0:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 0:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 0:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Batocera victoriana / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.09.2015 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's why I ask coaching this group :)

09.09.2015 0:09, Peter Khramov:

Without the base, could not unsubscribe: he know that without it, nothing will not be edited.

09.09.2015 0:07, Peter Khramov:

Irina, now you must once again displayed a list of species for which there foty, but illustration is not yet exhibited. Check that all the rules?

09.09.2015 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pro-base could not ask: http://www.cerambycoidea.com/specie.asp?Id=34&Tipo=T
Tomorrow will be the source of the database.

09.09.2015 0:03, Peter Khramov:

1. After the 14th.
2. Base.

09.09.2015 0:02, Peter Khramov:

Regions and explanations recovered, now everything is OK.

08.09.2015 23:59, Peter Khramov:

Yes, about 70 ph copyrights have passed without large backups. Now for them stamped, all of the new machine will go all copyrights, as usual. Thanks for the tip.

08.09.2015 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is a subspecies of tricincta (Duncan, 1835) kind of Thysia wallichii (Hope, 1831)
It is necessary to Lamiinae: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/842328 doing tribe
Ceroplesini Thomson, 1860 with childbirth:
Ceroplesis Dejean, 1835
Cochliopalpus Lacordaire, 1872
Diastocera Dejean, 1835
Gnathoenia Thomson, 1858
Mimoceroplesis Breuning, 1967
Paranaleptes Breuning, 1937
Pterotragus Chevrolat, 1856
Pycnopsis Thomson, 1860
Thysia J. Thomson, 1860

08.09.2015 23:58, Peter Khramov:

It turned out only 119 taxa such that with Linnaeus. But the same is not the case. Fixed.

08.09.2015 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aristobia approximator / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Batocera victoriana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Batocera victoriana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2015 23:20, Svetlana Shchavelina:

:) No problem :) # 42798

08.09.2015 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And))
Yes, and with butterflies in principle a good idea)

08.09.2015 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Answered.

08.09.2015 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, he was a taxon Lamia textor: http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/157235
There's generally all strange. The essence of fasting is that Linnaeus is not written in Swedish: Linné , and in Latin: Linnaeus as the Latin name of all taxa. Here a similar gaffe by Linnaeus in many taxa. So, the way they write on many sources, but it is fundamentally wrong.

08.09.2015 22:37, Peter Khramov:

Basil, the answer sluzhbke about comments (see, you missed the question), it is unclear what to do with it.

08.09.2015 22:32, Peter Khramov:

Krosavets. With beetles, I look at you and really good business situation.

08.09.2015 22:29, Peter Khramov:

The definition should be at least until something to the same division in the galleries and communities do. But there is an alternative. And if dipterologi will not catch up, then what for the site need from Diptera then?) And if they stay within bezvylazno molbiola and determine on the engine, forum, and all will be "as usual".

08.09.2015 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and that there is some alternative?
At least until the site itself is not seen.
Only will increase the number of photos to a certain detachment (
I have a general definition of the definition as such is not seen though you burst .....

08.09.2015 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Good!

08.09.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and you're all going to molbiol, look, there will be even more dipterologov.

08.09.2015 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Again kick the French site: http://www.coleoptera-atlas.com/cerambycidae-chrysomeloidea/lamiinae/batocerini/rosenbergia/Rosenbergia-straussi
There's this kind of mistake is exposed as a Rosenbergia straussi Gestro, 1876
But the same blooper is inherent to many souvenir sellers: http://www.insectopia.ru/index.php?productID=667
And considering that the Tob according to some major share of the buyer on Ebay once again the French can be understood that the definition they do not check ((
Here Rosenbergia straussi Gestro, 1876 : http: //www.cerambycoidea.com / foto.asp? Id = 1234
But Rosenbergia rufolineata Breuning, 1948 : http://www.cerambycoidea.com/foto.asp?Id=30
No words....

08.09.2015 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, well after the 14th will kick you sure about my supervision Cerambycidae :)

08.09.2015 21:21, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, thank you. To date, more 6-7 species found with the same glitches (and, it seems, is not the end. As for the Jura - well, not a lover, he verbally explained, it is easier to write)

08.09.2015 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Were it were determined - was, would do fine.
Fedor before you upload photos recommend first contact here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=138133
The fact that there are very good. dipterologi good, of which is on the site is not known, and catch up, ever.

08.09.2015 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Both mustache, alas lost (
Apparently in a fight ....
to Svetlana Schavelina:
I remember you had already defined this type of site (unfortunately I do not remember where).
I want to ask you to put the photo.

08.09.2015 21:09, Fedor Ovechkin:

Another such is, later loaded.

08.09.2015 21:03, Peter Khramov:

Funny thing.

08.09.2015 21:02, Peter Khramov:

Basil, that the comments your "Family Name Carl Linnaeus in Latin ...", to which he was subject? Shtoto strange glitch or something, I do not see the starting post.
Alexander, Irina, will you split, do not worry. And if about "straight right now," then do not worry - there is no "pile Insectoids" in the gallery or in the comments are not observed (just do not have time to download yet).Regarding the display of the form in the right column - see. With regards to the phones - Duc tea Yuri if not my number, the site he is hanging in the contacts.

08.09.2015 20:19, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, that's not a single glitch was discovered - the duplication of some species. Let me explain with an example of 3 - opens http://insecta.pro/ru/taxonomy/21668, http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/21891 or http://insecta.pro/taxonomy/21518, and on the right in the list other species it is duplicated. Moreover, these types of illustrates the correct photo, but neither these nor any other picture of this kind are not recorded on the right - "Photos of this species on the website yet."Since I have a number of pictures, check their presence in the gallery - all in place. And if you open any image to the right is all right, for example http://insecta.pro/ru/gallery/27098

08.09.2015 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Batocera rubus / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2015 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Note: many sources of barbel incorrectly defined as a subspecies of the sulphurea of another member of the genusCelosterna pollinosa
Example: http://www.coleoptera-atlas.com/cerambycidae-chrysomeloidea/lamiinae/lamiini-agniini/Celosterna/Celosterna-pollinosa-sulphurea
That is true certain:
Celosterna pollinosa var. sulphurea Heller, 1907 : http://www.cerambycoidea.com/foto.asp?Id=1867 (note: the variation, and not subspecies).
Celosterna luteopubens (Pic, 1925) : http://www.cerambycoidea.com/foto.asp? Id = 272
Just look spread and look to understand why the first link definition is incorrect.
P.S. It will be necessary later to add the correct sources for barbel :)

08.09.2015 17:48, Irina Nikulina:

Peter wanted to write about the same, I will not repeat, I agree with Alexander. I thought and comments, and galleries are somehow divided into squads, and thought so, as it turned out, not just me. With the Night (DV-AM) in the Jura Agent convinced me that something I did not understand, and everything will somehow divided, it was convenient to use.When I saw that, and how, he asked, even call you to clarify why. Or is it temporary? So far no ship, digest)

08.09.2015 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scaphoidella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

08.09.2015 17:32, Irina Nikulina:

Comostola subtiliaria, I think

08.09.2015 15:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Scaphoidella sp. The length of 5 mm. Determined Emelyanov AF ZIN.

08.09.2015 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, the first impressions going horrible pick among a heap Insectoids butterflies I'm not interested. you have to share, and news feeds for the troops. otherwise this mess people will lose interest. eeto first impressions going.

08.09.2015 14:11, Svetlana Shchavelina:

On increasing fotah no copyright attached.

08.09.2015 13:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Ruspolia yezoensis (Matsumura et Shiraki). Determined Storozhenko S.Yu. BPI FEB RAS.

08.09.2015 12:11, Yuri Semejkin:

It is the largest species of the family in Russia Mantispidae

08.09.2015 12:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Catalog regions do not work and explain to them. Or even done?

08.09.2015 11:51, Peter Khramov:

Very well. Immediately and confirmed.

08.09.2015 11:49, Peter Khramov:

Yes, everything is going in the same gallery. But the ability to do the selection in the gallery of the taxon. So loading slowly, all the rules, you can continue in the same spirit.

08.09.2015 7:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Understood

08.09.2015 7:29, Yuri Semejkin:

It so happens that here the definition given by two specialists. That I did not have the patience to wait for the answer to the 1st request to make the second.

08.09.2015 7:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

Lepidoptera

08.09.2015 7:00, Fedor Ovechkin:

Lepidoptera

08.09.2015 6:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter. Because under the kind of impossible to put a photo or a butterfly or beetle ...... Actually anyone.
And pay attention to the page of the form on the right there is not already uploaded photos.
It was already a story and again arose. It is necessary to improve.

08.09.2015 2:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Not attached to 42719. Do not ship, waiting for clarification.

08.09.2015 2:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Elasmostethus humeralis Jakovlev, 1883
Peter! Somehow I do not understand. Now that all the teams will be loaded into a single gallery. Or I hasten to boot?

07.09.2015 23:53, Peter Khramov:

So, the site moved to a Lepidoptera.ru Insecta.pro.
Now we are working not only butterflies, but also with all other insects. In this regard, the base taxa increased by 10 times.
All the basic functions restored, you can work with the site as usual - shipping foty, comments, etc.
All appearances and passwords remain the same.The only thing - if you have used the function of remembering the password, you will need more time to go to your account. Someone forgot your password - use the recovery (link at the top of each page).In the coming days will dopilivat translation for the English version, further align the base taxa (particularly in terms of synonyms), and a week later, to the 8th anniversary of the site, all of the major improvements will be completed.
ZY Until that time, moderators can perform all functions except the base of straightening taxa.So please them while on such issues do not kick. But after September 14 to kick very need: -)
Who has any comments, who noticed the changes in the bad / good - write in the subject.
Zzy Together with the transfer mechanism avtopodstanovok changed.Now it is not on the dancing level taxon, and the degree of coincidence with the name of the taxon, as well as accessories to a main or taxon to be synonymous. Now it will be easier to search, especially species names short.

06.09.2015 18:38, Alex Dumchus:

Well-preserved for 40 years. Where did that? Then, in Mexico, our people, as well as to the bakery for a taxi :))) did not go.

06.09.2015 14:25, Igor Ivannikov:

It is now clear. Thank Basil.

06.09.2015 14:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm off the phone is hard to see, but imagining completely different subfamily.
Clepsis pallidana

06.09.2015 13:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nicholas, let me ask.
What should have been a double load photo # 42551?
Not because, you see, that no one has commented on the first photo?
To be honest: I wanted to comment, but did not for ethical reasons (besides unflattering words do not come to mind).

06.09.2015 13:51, Irina Nikulina:

There are doubts, that here and in the adjacent images caterpillars Parasa consocia, they are a little bit more http://www.jpmoth.org/Limacodidae/Limacodinae/Parasa_consocia.html. And it is ratherParasa hilarata, uncommon in view of the Primorye http://www.jlpazy.com/www/main/Show.asp?PicID=540 and http://www.bubuleps.com/Parasahilarata.php.

06.09.2015 13:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Good. Let modernizing decide.

06.09.2015 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Miletus chinensis Miletus chinensis learchus.

06.09.2015 12:20, Irina Nikulina:

http://rusinsects.com/hesperid/hes-o-oc.htm and http://rusinsects.com/hesperid/hes-tsyl.htm They are well differ on underside, especially in the central cell and transmission dark wide at the near-edge zone ochracea. Here is a typical underside ochracea http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35275 Determination confirmed S.Korbom. In sylvatica underside uniformly yellow with dark veins are well incised http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27637

06.09.2015 10:30, Alexander Belousov:

Wingspan 40 mm

06.09.2015 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Again transfer flew ((
Igor, something changed.
The site does not stand still, and developing: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/41122
It is not necessary to write a subspecies of the top line :)
Now you can put directly to the subspecies, race (if the species is not known), family (if the genus is unknown), etc.
Here I am I correct in relation to innovations.

06.09.2015 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morpho cisseis Morpho cisseis gahua.

06.09.2015 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morpho cisseis Morpho cisseis gahua.

06.09.2015 8:15, Yuri Semejkin:

No Il. It Ochlodes ochracea

05.09.2015 23:35, Igor Ivannikov:

Basil, which again is wrong with me? It seemed to me that I'm writing it right.

05.09.2015 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

ThisThymelicus sylvatica

05.09.2015 23:10, Irina Nikulina:

Peter tried to illustrate the new species, which appeared today in my LC - everything turned out okay. And http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23116 still some glitch. And it is not LC, and photo page of the form is not loaded. Maybe because I just put them with the name of the subspecies? Or it does not matter? In general, see for yourself, please, what's wrong with marshmallows.

05.09.2015 23:02, Peter Khramov:

We begin a new campaign translations, including comments. Concerning:
1. Remember, in the form of posting commentaries there is a window of translation into English. If you speak the language well - please unsubscribe to transfer, preserving all the tags (if you use them in Russian comments).
2.If you do not know English - consider when writing a commentary in Russian, which he later will be translated into English . Translation in most cases is a two-penetration - go first software interpreter, then the result combed manually living person. I beg:
- Is it possible to write to the competent Russian.Let me explain. Write instead of "caterpillar", "goose" - this is normal . Bo adds shades. But «gusInitsa" - it is quite normal . This is bad for the Russian version, and for the transfer of doubly bad.
- Adding to the previous step: use punctuation to the spot.Sometimes such "Eats, Blogs" meet, that I myself understand the fifth time, what there translations.
- Distinctly formulate their thoughts.

PS: decent possession = free written communication with native speakers.

05.09.2015 22:01, Elena Ivannikova: This species is identified correctly.

05.09.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Costaconvexa caespitaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.09.2015 19:29, Alexander Belousov:

Wing-spread is 44 mm.

05.09.2015 19:21, Basil Sergienko:

Costaconvexa caespitaria

05.09.2015 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus melanippus Danaus melanippus edmondii.

05.09.2015 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Danaus melanippus Danaus melanippus edmondii.

05.09.2015 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morpho cisseis Morpho cisseis gahua.

05.09.2015 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Morpho cisseis Morpho cisseis gahua.

05.09.2015 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pelurga taczanowskiaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.09.2015 16:51, Basil Sergienko:

Pelurga taczanowskiaria

05.09.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, there were the same number of years and not steamed (me in particular). And you should not have anything over LAN pry :)
As an example, a profile on molbiol:
There have daw settings: "I do not want to receive e-mail messages from other users"
If it is to put something accordingly no letters will not come.And when you try to write to a hidden address is derived form with sleduyushy notice: "The recipient does not want to show your e-mail, but you can send him a letter from the form below. Enter your valid e-mail address and name, if raschityvaete get an answer. "
Parallel to this there is also the usual PM.
Also, there are "black list".And this I believe is the best.
After all, to demonstrate whether or not the address is a private matter of each participant.

05.09.2015 14:43, Peter Khramov:

But those who need soap, may know his address via PM.

05.09.2015 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, for a permanent (and not only) there is an alternative to the correspondence as "soaps."
So do: with daw "show / hide" or without - I essentially no difference.
From junk mail is now easily possible to get rid of:
at Yandex has a very effective spam filter (and probably other mail systems as well)

05.09.2015 12:23, Peter Khramov:

Can. While on the other hand, there is clearly no PM to a constant correspondence, and for primary and irregular contact communication.

05.09.2015 5:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry. Something I do not remember - to see the old one)))
In the end, if someone is annoying show on the public email address - you can do in the LC option "Show / hide email address" to the user himself made the decision.
I, for example from the phone much easier just to check the mail, you climb to the site to check your private messages ....

05.09.2015 4:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis ino / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

05.09.2015 4:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

05.09.2015 2:14, Irina Nikulina:

Peter uploaded a couple of photos of rare marshmallow, new look for the site, but in my LC in unillustrated kinds of links does not appear. I tried to illustrate - failed.

05.09.2015 1:20, Irina Nikulina:

Here is the reference for new subspecies: http://www.catalogueoflife.org/col/details/species/id/cd8450659d34e9b0c8489a26ae56c7fc

05.09.2015 1:13, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, I have not quite get it, should I give the reference? Usually you or moderators added species/subspecies. Here is the reference, just in case: http://www.gbif.org/species/104857692 и http://gni.globalnames.org/name_strings?page=413&search_term=ns%3AGAS*

05.09.2015 0:20, Peter Khramov:

Please, give the reference.

05.09.2015 0:18, Peter Khramov:

I explained to you that the issue is already on the phone.

05.09.2015 0:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

B. ino

05.09.2015 0:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

A. paphia

04.09.2015 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.09.2015 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.09.2015 20:59, Basil Sergienko:

Hypena rostralis

04.09.2015 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and where were all the authors from the pages of "soap"?
I believe that in addition to "lichku" lolzhny attend and e-mail addresses of authors as an alternative to this, the most PM :)

04.09.2015 19:19, Peter Khramov:

Funeta infa was not eve the first source of information for the website. However it works as one of the sources.
There will be large update when we move to insecta.pro.

04.09.2015 18:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Mythimna impura (Hubner, 1808)

04.09.2015 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That is okay, no "bad form". You can ask a question and I can answer it.
I just have often add species and even entire genus bypassing funeta. This is normal practice.

04.09.2015 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Endothenia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.09.2015 13:58, Irina Nikulina:

It also Endothenia sp. Determination of Al. Zhakova. Photos in the group

04.09.2015 13:56, Irina Nikulina:

Gastropacha populifolia angustipennis Walker, 1855

04.09.2015 13:56, Irina Nikulina:

Gastropacha populifolia angustipennis Walker, 1855. It's necessary to add the subspecies and the description of the species.

04.09.2015 13:49, Fedor Ovechkin:

Basil, you are probably right but I am not so interested to google it. I just saw mismatch and wrote about it. If it is bad form here, i will hold back from writing such statements. :)

04.09.2015 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Funet is not main source of information for the website. It's just as first of them.
Now funete is out of time as it is rarely updated))
Fedor, you better google. you can really find some information :)

04.09.2015 13:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Fedor! Vasily just wants to say that currently there is not entire information at the website..We are waiting for big update at least for Far East.
Therefore, we have to search some information. Some sources mention that Manbuta rhomboidalis; M. sobria; Turbida M. et al. but it's necessary to check whether it i really found in South America. We need to check everything first and then identify it. .

04.09.2015 13:00, Fedor Ovechkin:

Basil try to get in my shoes, there is only one species for this genus stated. And there is just one species for the genus due to ([9] Tree of Life (funet.fi), 2012). As I understood funet is the main source of identification.
It is a Peter's problem, don't ask me to google.

04.09.2015 12:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.09.2015 12:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.09.2015 12:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Endothenia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.09.2015 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It doesn't take a rocket scientist. we should not tresspass upon obvious things:)

04.09.2015 12:38, Fedor Ovechkin:

Lycaenidae

04.09.2015 12:38, Fedor Ovechkin:

And wee try it the top down :) I propose to begin with Lycaenidae!

04.09.2015 12:35, Irina Nikulina:

Endothenia sp. Determination of Al. Zhakova

04.09.2015 12:34, Irina Nikulina:

Argynnis sp.

04.09.2015 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If there is just one species at the website it doesn't mean that only one species really exists :)
http://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Manbuta/classification/
Whet the species is identified, it will be added and the photo transfered.
Fedor you better google Manbuta first, before making such statements.

04.09.2015 11:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

Is there any other options If there is just one species in the genus?

04.09.2015 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alucita / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

04.09.2015 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adscita / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

04.09.2015 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.09.2015 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limacodidae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.09.2015 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heterocampa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.09.2015 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diaphania / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

04.09.2015 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Manbuta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.09.2015 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heterocampa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.09.2015 10:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diaphania / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.09.2015 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heterocampa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.09.2015 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heterocampa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.09.2015 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxydia / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

04.09.2015 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stigmella / Confidently identified / Nikolai Vladimirov.

04.09.2015 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42626 group.

04.09.2015 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42628 group.

04.09.2015 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42630 group.

04.09.2015 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42633 group.

04.09.2015 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42634 group.

04.09.2015 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42637 group.

04.09.2015 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42624 group.

04.09.2015 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42623 group.

03.09.2015 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2015 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2015 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2015 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.09.2015 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2015 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.09.2015 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Everything is fine.
They also were in the admin (4 photos) how Inachis io.
He pulled out and did not have to endure.

03.09.2015 22:46, Peter Khramov:

Basil, it will be fixed on Insecta.pro.

03.09.2015 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Fedor removed. Basil, I think, just coincided and phot was taken as a phantom. About transfer of a species - try now if you will not, tell me where to transfer, I'll try and see what there is not.

03.09.2015 22:38, Leon Ortlieb:

Of course we could not help but making photo of them. It's not a retouching photo (better quality if you open it). I was glad to see how happy was my granddaughter when loosing butterflies.

03.09.2015 22:27, Leon Ortlieb:

I wanted to find something special for my granddaughter when she graduated first grade, something that could courage her interest for nature. I found a cage with zip and transparent cover so it was easy to observe. Then put there peacock eye and small tortoise-shell caterpillars. besides I made same present to my niece. Children were happy to receive such presents!
Granddaughter told me that it was the best present even better then any computer game! Of course I was happy to hear that.
We fed caterpillars with nettles, and more than a dozen (all of them) pupated.

03.09.2015 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What nonsense is this?
I define this photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42618, trying to move-not tolerated.
I am writing to comment and get it here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42617
Head spin already.

03.09.2015 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Transfer to the form does not work?
Aglais iois ordinary, nettles cracks like he expected :)

03.09.2015 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Phrudocentra / Confidently identified / Imago / Tatyana Gordeeva.

03.09.2015 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tolype / Tentatively identified / Imago / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

03.09.2015 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Oxydia / Confidently identified / Imago / Evgeny Komarov.

03.09.2015 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Sosxetra / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.09.2015 13:58, Fedor Ovechkin:

We ought to bear the same # 4975 and # 5009 and # 5038

03.09.2015 6:41, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Comment, please photo 42551.

03.09.2015 5:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We also can not move it to the subspecies.
Earlier, a similar question is raised about own photos.
We are looking forward to fixing it :)

02.09.2015 22:53, Irina Nikulina:

This is a repeat of the photo # 37134.

02.09.2015 22:48, Irina Nikulina:

Arctornis l-nigrum ussuricum Bytinski-Salz, 1939 . This subspecies is stated in the genus description but it doesn't appear in auto expand. There are only three subspecies appear and ussurica (um) is absent. This Far Eastern subspecies tend to have more obvious black L.

02.09.2015 20:52, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euploea core?

02.09.2015 20:10, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euploea core?

02.09.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas iduna Euphydryas iduna sajana.

02.09.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas iduna Euphydryas iduna sajana.

02.09.2015 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas iduna Euphydryas iduna sajana.

02.09.2015 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas iduna Euphydryas iduna sajana.

02.09.2015 19:11, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euploea klugii?

02.09.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea diamina Melitaea diamina erycina.

02.09.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea diamina Melitaea diamina erycina.

02.09.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea diamina Melitaea diamina erycina.

02.09.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea diamina Melitaea diamina erycina.

02.09.2015 18:23, Yuri Semejkin:

I wish somebody else takes a look at it.

02.09.2015 18:20, Irina Nikulina:

In my opinion, it is a shabby Ctenoplusia agnata http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/10Plusiinae/4163%20Ctenoplusia%20agnata/Ctenoplusia%20agnata.htm

02.09.2015 18:10, Fedor Ovechkin:

I also have a phantom - Photo # 33698 - delete please!

02.09.2015 18:08, Irina Nikulina:

Thyatira batis mandschurica Werny, 1967 It is necessary to add the subspecies

02.09.2015 18:04, Peter Khramov:

At the latest, the insects go on the weekends. I will try before.

02.09.2015 18:01, Peter Khramov:

While working in obychngm mode. After a couple of days a new stage, there will tell.

02.09.2015 17:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Subspecies minor Sterneck, 1927

02.09.2015 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Udea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.09.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paratalanta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.09.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Udea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.09.2015 17:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Yasnenko

02.09.2015 17:18, Irina Nikulina:

Paratalanta sp. (see the bottom comment.)

02.09.2015 17:17, Irina Nikulina:

Udea sp. Determination to the kind of confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

02.09.2015 17:17, Irina Nikulina:

Udea sp. Determination to the kind of confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (GTS them. Komarov FEB RAS)

02.09.2015 17:11, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! Please plan works: one ship that "prichёsyvaem"; whether you want to search for bugs and test the overall functionality. The event was a big, bulky, Delhi, please, loading ...

02.09.2015 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, because of the insects it does not go. We are talking about moving the site to a new hosting and arising in connection with these bugs.
Everything is still to come :)

02.09.2015 16:54, Yuri Semejkin:

What other snapshots. Detachments? I would like to see biooraznoobrazie.

02.09.2015 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2015 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2015 16:19, Peter Khramov:

All is ready. Phantoms are removed, new pictures can be downloaded.

02.09.2015 15:35, Peter Khramov:

Basil, phantoms ph will be deleted after a deal with uploading your photos to the site.

02.09.2015 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, we must in my LC remove the last two photos, which in fact is not: Photo # 42562 and # 42563 Photography.
They do not need - the file was intended to replace the photo, which has long been in the gallery.
Failed to load, and turned the pages, and hung in the LC.

02.09.2015 15:07, Peter Khramov:

The site could not be available during the last couple of hours. Now all the rules.

02.09.2015 2:32, Yuri Semejkin:

You just have to relax and the solution will come! The site will wait, do not worry.

02.09.2015 0:22, Peter Khramov:

No, this is a glitch that needs to be treated, but offhand I do not see how. But I see, of course.

01.09.2015 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ready for all five photos.

01.09.2015 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So we have to wait. Transfer site business long. Especially if the site is big: What is essentially lepidoptera.ru is.
No need to hurry. Logic dictates that we have to wait another until all the upheavals have been completed ..

01.09.2015 21:24, Fedor Ovechkin:

Photos are not loaded, the page is created, and no pictures.

01.09.2015 20:51, Fedor Ovechkin:

Underside (instead of the super macro)

01.09.2015 20:50, Fedor Ovechkin:

underside (instead of the Super Macro)

01.09.2015 20:50, Fedor Ovechkin:

Underside (instead of the super macro)

01.09.2015 20:50, Fedor Ovechkin:

Underside (instead of the super macro)

01.09.2015 20:49, Fedor Ovechkin:

Underside (instead of the super macro)

31.08.2015 20:28, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Agapeta hamana.

31.08.2015 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 15:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Length is 1 cm.

31.08.2015 13:00, Yuri Semejkin:

But it seems there is no other variants.

31.08.2015 12:38, Irina Nikulina:

Well then, no question. In fact it's difficult to tell the size by the photo, but once you compare with Thyrgorina jankowskii, probably it is a miniata.

31.08.2015 12:20, Yuri Semejkin:

I had a look. http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lithosiinae/Miltochrista_rosacea.htm
Miltochrista rosacea differs from Miltochrista by smaller size(Dubatolov). I would not say that there is a small butterfly on my photo. If you compare it with others, Its size similar to Thyrgorina jankowskii.

31.08.2015 12:09, Leon Ortlieb:

Peter, the questions that you can not answer, despite the fact that you are a biologist, are a sign of yellow?

Many people firmly believed in the idea of ​​communism, but time has shown that it was a fantasy. We were taught the doctrines that fit existing then leadership. And all dissidents removed and destroyed, for example Vavilov and others like him.We are destroying people like Lysenko.

http://club.foto.ru/gallery/34/photos/1900780/?&day=10&month=11&year=2014&cat_id=34&page=1&top100=1&sort=date&prev_photo_id=1900771#!


But the damage inflicted enormous. Trained many zombies are not able to think, to reason, to investigate properly. Brought up opportunists.

Today, there is nothing easier to learn about Darwin and Wallace.

They could learn about the complex structures and the microcosm.There is no reason to believe that there was the chance and give the blind chance.

And as for my tongue, it has suffered, in the decades that live abroad, it's true. Although perhaps your Russian is far from ideal: Example: "pop nonsense - we're trying to connect online scholarly and popular, etc." ... We are not going to bother.You are right to communicate online, this specific case .. not always hunting to write about all the many, and this, from the brevity suffering.

31.08.2015 11:51, Irina Nikulina:

Peter was on his own, when it comes to DV, and reinsured) The very fact determines it is not easy. I decided to wait for the morning, so Alexander looked at just in case .. you beat) Do not put your last quickly on species such as came from the fields)

31.08.2015 11:47, Irina Nikulina:

There is another close species from Russian Far East Miltochrista rosacea, i do not know what exact deference between them, there is few photos of rosacea.

31.08.2015 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rivula sericealis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.08.2015 9:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.08.2015 9:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

31.08.2015 9:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

31.08.2015 9:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

31.08.2015 9:12, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

31.08.2015 9:12, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

31.08.2015 9:12, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

31.08.2015 9:11, Fedor Ovechkin:

male

31.08.2015 9:09, Fedor Ovechkin:

Peter, look, please, comment on the photo # 42463!

31.08.2015 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's exactly male (the bend angle of the forewing upper edge has clear-cut).
And species is correct in my opinion, but let someone else look.

31.08.2015 7:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Miltochrista miniata ?

31.08.2015 3:04, Peter Khramov:

Irina, remind about the functional forms of illustration. As the new appeared thee also downloaded immediately and illustrations Mona, that there ...

31.08.2015 2:16, Peter Khramov:

Straight from John Donne on the train from Moscow to Beijing. Although right now there is rumored romance is not the same. Gryat even bed linen began to change after the kitaytsiv.

31.08.2015 1:11, Irina Nikulina:

So it has a start - Cossinae and Lithosiinae on the spot). Start small (by volume), and happy to share ostalnym..nu and for "complex", "John Donne" is not enough, there is talk that)). Shamil, and about the expedition, to be honest, I thought - kidding)

31.08.2015 0:56, Irina Nikulina:

I Guess, Eilema nankingicum

30.08.2015 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Leon, I think here it is:

like this brainless butterfly focuses on the world map?
Where it is hidden navigator?
Who commands them?
Who shows them the way ??
Who are coded chips that were transferred to the microdroplets from father to son?


coupled with the casual attitude to spelling - is a sign of yellowing.And that's about it:

nonsense Wallace and Darwin

well that was recalled. This is your phrase something clarifies the issue of how to relate to your posts.

ZY A separate topic did.

30.08.2015 20:11, Fedor Ovechkin:

Scopula emissaria

30.08.2015 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

30.08.2015 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

30.08.2015 19:21, Alexander Belousov:

P. Icarus from Dzungarian Ala Tau .

30.08.2015 18:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutella xylostella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.08.2015 18:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutella xylostella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.08.2015 17:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Small, 5 mm

30.08.2015 15:45, Leon Ortlieb:

Peter, I understand your desire to receive adequate information. Otherwise, if you believe all the information can be printed and tales of Santa Claus to believe, and to consider the actual or delusions about Wallace and Darwin, and live with that. (However, we kind of touched on this subject, and colleagues asked then move and make a separate topic. I have not found where you moved.I am pleased to be honored. You did not give me a link?

The fact that the yellowing can come from the tabloids, I guess, but I can not grasp how you saw in my first comment yellowness. Explain, please.

30.08.2015 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha amoenella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

30.08.2015 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha amoenella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

30.08.2015 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha amoenella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

30.08.2015 13:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Ypsolopha amoenella ?

30.08.2015 13:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Ypsolopha amoenella ?

30.08.2015 13:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Ypsolopha amoenella ?

30.08.2015 13:50, Yury Dobroserdoff: This species is identified correctly.

30.08.2015 13:49, Yury Dobroserdoff: This species is identified correctly.

30.08.2015 13:49, Yury Dobroserdoff: This species is identified correctly.

30.08.2015 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Same thing here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42380
It is impossible to put a subspecies although it is on the page of the genus.
I have to write a subspecies in the top line (

30.08.2015 11:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42507 group.

30.08.2015 11:16, Yury Dobroserdoff:

Thank you.

30.08.2015 11:15, Yury Dobroserdoff:

Thank you.

30.08.2015 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.08.2015 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.08.2015 10:48, Yury Dobroserdoff:

Shot it during a walk in woods. Can't classify. Please help.

30.08.2015 10:47, Yury Dobroserdoff:

Shot it during a walk in woods. Can't classify it. Please help.

30.08.2015 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can not move to the subspecies (not autosubstitution), though the subspecies is on the page of the form.
While I will write on the top line.
Peter, deal.

30.08.2015 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

30.08.2015 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Erebia rossii Erebia rossii ero.

30.08.2015 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Erebia rossii Erebia rossii ero.

30.08.2015 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Erebia rossii Erebia rossii ero.

30.08.2015 1:43, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Paradysstroma corussaria.

30.08.2015 1:42, Peter Khramov:

Yellowness - from the tabloids.
Pop nonsense - we're trying to connect online scholarly and popular, but there are close to skirting the boundaries of this "popular", behind which begins the flow of information, such as meaningful as nonsense.As published by the facts and the manner of their presentation (including, by the way, and spelling) visitors judged on its contents and with more or less comfort use this Web resource. Therefore, the absence of yellowing and delirium - that's good.Note 1: recall that persisted until just at the right page for the publication of information on the form, not the fote.
Note 2: exclamations of "Oh, what a cute little thing" on page pictures I do not consider to delirium.

These explanations are not very well go to the web, where communication between people is very specific.If possible, I try to explain it in person, or even a mobile phone. And the fact is, people do not understand each other and / or offended.

30.08.2015 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Yuri keep calm, everything is okay.

30.08.2015 1:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

30.08.2015 1:01, Yuri Semejkin:

How long will it be still unidentified? If exuvium is not necessary, then remove it.

30.08.2015 0:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Typo. Correctly will Paradysstroma corussaria. See. Http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42344

29.08.2015 22:33, Leon Ortlieb:

Then explain what kind of yellowness pozhalusta question!
and what is "all but the pop nonsense."
It looks like I missed the modern jargon of the Russian language. Previously, there was a class of people that without the mat-peremat could not speak Russian. Absolutely. But you're not one of those looks. But in plain Russian can be explained. Explain pozhalusta ..

29.08.2015 22:20, Peter Khramov:

That's for sure.

29.08.2015 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tarsolepis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.08.2015 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tarsolepis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.08.2015 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amesia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.08.2015 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amesia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.08.2015 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fabric, the size of the bag, hoop, handle, etc., etc ......
In short in many respects.
Shamil, read the literature (old Soviet): everything is painted like that, but how to make their own hands :)

29.08.2015 19:35, Shamil Murtazin:

What then unlike conventional truant? And on the water?

29.08.2015 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now location information is correct.
And it helped to identify the subspecies :)
"The Baikal region subspecies - Erebia rossii ero Bremer, 1861." Burlov (first link, at the bottom):
http://babochki.narod.ru/sa17.html
http://catocala.narod.ru/sa17.html

29.08.2015 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Normally everything on site at first. Possible changes, I think the process will be shown. It is difficult because all at once in one's head to bed.

29.08.2015 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

29.08.2015 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

29.08.2015 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

29.08.2015 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

29.08.2015 16:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, now the problem of double determination came to the fore. Determination to sort.

29.08.2015 16:38, Yuri Semejkin:

What sat on that and took off. Color did not choose.

29.08.2015 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Protective bag" usually just cut off with such a net (known people) because it is a burden and thrown away - in fact, he nafig not needed.
Apparently here the bag is good, durable fabric in which the protection is not necessary.

29.08.2015 16:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I understand that the net for cutting should consist of two bags (external "security" and the internal "Stalker")? Why is there then one? http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/2051

29.08.2015 15:50, Alexander Belousov:

And red looks great, too!

29.08.2015 15:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gelechia jakovlevi / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

29.08.2015 15:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gelechia jakovlevi / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

29.08.2015 15:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gelechia jakovlevi / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

29.08.2015 15:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Gelechia jakovlevi, Vlad Proklov

29.08.2015 15:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Gelechia jakovlevi, Vlad Proklov

29.08.2015 15:30, Peter Khramov:

About yellowness - I do not color on the picture meant.
About the data - no, not better, if he will select a moderator. More specifically, it will select, but initially not information should be published on page pictures, and on page form simply because it belongs to the species rather than the picture.At the same time, any user can publish two types:
Those that belong to some sections of the description (for example, the same Russian name) - the link to add information on the form on the page at the top right of the form.
Those that do not fall in the description section, including all but the pop nonsense - in the comments to mean.And then a moderator may decide to formalize something, something to clean up, etc. of necessity.
ZY Then the form would have long been a Russian name, but rather as soon as you publish it.

29.08.2015 15:25, Leon Ortlieb:

Peter, about yellowness really leave. Taken so already yellow rapeseed sheet.
And infoy, it is not clear that the site is interesting, what it is not. As in previous times, despite the fact that the site did not have Russian names a butterfly, I found NAME threw, and to this day the pale meadow joker without a name on the website .. http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42333.Since I do not know what's important, you need a site, it could be better if he moderator will select what he good? Or where to translate, if the generated interest. I'm not against..

29.08.2015 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Basil, that the thread of beetles came after inspections?

29.08.2015 14:01, Shamil Murtazin:

This indefinable? ..

29.08.2015 14:01, Shamil Murtazin:

This indefinable? ..

29.08.2015 14:01, Shamil Murtazin:

It did not happen to bring. Gusyanka first froze, and then darkened. This is a system - autumn butterflies in stage gusyanki I often die ...

29.08.2015 13:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Paradysstroma corussana

29.08.2015 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.08.2015 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.08.2015 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achaea serva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.08.2015 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achaea serva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.08.2015 11:05, Peter Khramov:

I understood completely.

29.08.2015 8:58, Nikolay Grebennikov:

The same glitch

29.08.2015 8:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Avtopodstaeovka a searching work. But any sense from that since the transition from a autosubstitution turns to the page of the form: "http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/ХХХХ Page Not Found" (((
We must deal with this completely.

29.08.2015 7:38, Artem Strizhov:

It Colias myrmidone?

29.08.2015 6:51, Artem Strizhov:

This Daphne?

29.08.2015 1:25, Peter Khramov:

No, there was just a mistake that the search was already pumped from insects: -)

29.08.2015 1:24, Peter Khramov:

Yellowness leave aside, but that's about the place of supply of information, Leon once again that information on the form, not of a particular fote / individuals on it, we publish page type , but not on the page foty.

29.08.2015 0:43, Leon Ortlieb:

Like migrating birds, these butterflies migrate from North Africa and the Mediterranean to the far North flying thousands of kilometers.
The British made the research "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), and reported that back to the south returned 4 times as more than flew away to the North. There is too little feed in hot south climate, and the species have to migrate to survive. Then the high Alps are not a barrier.

28.08.2015 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

28.08.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.08.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.08.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.08.2015 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.08.2015 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.08.2015 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.08.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.08.2015 23:10, Leon Ortlieb:

According to the determinant, in rare cases, ox eye 2 eye can have that here there ..

28.08.2015 22:32, Shamil Murtazin:

At first it did not work, and then whether there was a cache, or what. Maybe not the server load has increased ... Search in line now works, thanks.

28.08.2015 22:07, Peter Khramov:

Did.

28.08.2015 20:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Search in a row does not work ...

28.08.2015 20:00, Daria Milkova:

The length of about 7-8 cm

28.08.2015 19:58, Daria Milkova:

6-7 cm long, very long hairs on the back

28.08.2015 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Macrothylacia rubi?

28.08.2015 17:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Not blue, but have Kirpichnikova, as well as on the website. Sinev probably just missed it. And since Fabricius, 1787 and ending Yamanaka, 1998 it described as at least 7 people.

28.08.2015 17:19, Peter Khramov:

They are coming!

28.08.2015 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not somewhere abroad, and in South America. And Sinev it is not. Therefore asked about the delivery :)

28.08.2015 16:55, Yuri Semejkin:

No spot. Just I have in mind that the 2 previous snapshot made Krajewski are made abroad.

28.08.2015 16:54, Peter Khramov:

On this issue, I do hammer because insects will be on a different partition structure authors and infa fotah etc. be quantified directly on their pages.

28.08.2015 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Importation?

28.08.2015 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear )
Peter, still need to align the counter pictures on the page "Authors" (breshet down) to the meter readings in the gallery, and LC. Each author is the discrepancy is not the first day. A feeling that counts on the page "we" stopped.

28.08.2015 16:25, Yuri Semejkin:

The first representative of Russia for this type.

28.08.2015 16:06, Peter Khramov:

They put new clothes on a server, is now taken, everything is OK.

28.08.2015 16:06, Peter Khramov:

Updating the server could occur because a variety of errors. Now all the rules. Link writers moved to the upper right (experimenting with the main menu). Foty any author can quickly select the gallery, using the appropriate drop-down list.

28.08.2015 16:04, Peter Khramov:

Today, with night and day work was carried out on our servers in several stages. In this regard it might incorrectly display the time on the site, upload foty and manifest similar glitches. Now updated to the end, more problems should not be. But if something else is not - reported.

28.08.2015 14:36, Yuri Semejkin:

And yet I do not see the column authors. Somewhere to go away and to view your images have to go in l / k and there to watch.

28.08.2015 14:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! During the day, several times tried to upload pictures. And each time after filling in all the fields, after pressing the load climbs inscription .. Internal server error. And of course the pictures are not loaded.
Probably and others. Also because I do not see pictures of replenishment.

28.08.2015 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Yuri that it was not loaded? Shamil see mending.

28.08.2015 11:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Specials (http://lepidoptera.ru/community/32203) do not open until the end (no tail correspondence and windows for the answer)

28.08.2015 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something with the clock: Online now in Moscow 8:59. And does not work editing posts.

28.08.2015 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, that's the topic: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/32203 I fully visible only through the Tor browser: https://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html#ru
Why is that? I hope that this is just a glitch that needs to be corrected :)

28.08.2015 7:33, Fedor Ovechkin:

Female

28.08.2015 7:32, Fedor Ovechkin:

Buck

28.08.2015 7:32, Fedor Ovechkin:

Female

28.08.2015 7:31, Fedor Ovechkin:

Female

28.08.2015 7:31, Fedor Ovechkin:

Buck

28.08.2015 7:31, Fedor Ovechkin:

Female

28.08.2015 4:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Not loaded, it gives an error 500 Internal Server Error

28.08.2015 0:06, Maria Pozdnova:

On Mesoligia furuncula also very similar, but the other antennae

27.08.2015 23:27, Peter Khramov:

There were bags of 40 normal and 50 cm (in white and khaki). And own a variety of cheap ethno nets. Because improper sold out:
Bag 30 cm white Entosfinks 250 rubles.
Bag 30 cm khaki Entosfinks 250 rubles.
Bag 30 cm khaki paradox 250 rubles.
Bag 65 cm white Entosfinks 450 rubles.

27.08.2015 22:50, Peter Khramov:

Why can not tolerate?

27.08.2015 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female

27.08.2015 21:48, Shamil Murtazin:

We look forward to an integrated report :) About the expedition, of course, I was not joking.

27.08.2015 20:18, Fedor Ovechkin:

There is information that such a spot just in the male should be:
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30010001.html
http://flutters.org/home/photogallery/index.php?level=picture&id=1851

27.08.2015 19:16, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, this copy of Ebipta and asked about which Theodore of Veta

27.08.2015 19:14, Alex Dumchus:

Fedor and pommotri pictured 38969. On the lower wings of female eyes with a white spot.

27.08.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

27.08.2015 17:53, Fedor Ovechkin:

Basil, here too, male and female

27.08.2015 17:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, who is where all the same?

27.08.2015 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

27.08.2015 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

27.08.2015 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #38968 group.

27.08.2015 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

27.08.2015 17:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pieris brassicae brassicae Pieris brassicae.

27.08.2015 16:58, Fedor Ovechkin:

There are different instances in the group, perhaps even of different sex

27.08.2015 16:43, Fedor Ovechkin:

It should be in the same group with the # 38968 and put the male and female

27.08.2015 16:20, Fedor Ovechkin:

Alexander, and what is opposed to females?

27.08.2015 15:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Closer to the mother institution.

27.08.2015 15:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Pieris brassicae

27.08.2015 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

I did not know where to hit the caterpillar. :)

27.08.2015 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.08.2015 15:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Cabbage like much, but a doll. So I decided to download, and for one and dr.stadii, that almost all (except the egg) chain was.

27.08.2015 15:28, Fedor Ovechkin:

Peter, please replace this picture №33614, if so, retaining the old number.

27.08.2015 15:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Pieris brassicae any glitch. Subspecies did not write, just downloaded, and can not be edited

27.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From Italy (Rome) vestimo: http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/PierisBrass.htm

27.08.2015 15:11, Yuri Semejkin:

From a doll?

27.08.2015 0:07, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I will do this thing (the drop-down response form on the page PM) so that you can respond to any of the pages, not just from the page author. But this is probably, after the transition to the insects.

26.08.2015 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. Today poyuzat: working properly.
One not very pleasant moment. When you answer an incoming message has to switch between the two pages: one where he was responsible, and that where there is a message on who is responsible. This greatly inconvenient and knocks thought.It is impossible, whether to make the correspondence led to any single page to be constantly before the eyes of what the answer?

26.08.2015 22:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sergey Novitckiy Alexandr Zhakov.

26.08.2015 22:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sergey Novitckiy Alexandr Zhakov.

26.08.2015 22:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sergey Novitckiy Alexandr Zhakov.

26.08.2015 20:59, Irina Nikulina:

3 photo supplied from Cossus Anisimovka and Tiger. I GuessCossus cossus. In Sinev listed species Cossus 2 to 40 in the region, and for Cossus cossus with WFD Set 1 podvid- Cossus cossus chinensis Rothschild, 1912. But molbiole Roman Yakovlev defined kossusov of Southern Primorye how Cossus orientalis Gaede, 1929. As in Sinev and we on the site of this kind is not (and subspecies C. c. shinensis we also have no need to be added). On jpmoth.org orientalis subspecies goes to Cossus cossus http://www.jpmoth.org/Cossidae/Cossinae/Cossus_cossus_orientalis.html.Article R. Yakovlev audit woodworm fragrant, published in 2008 in the Amur Zool. magazine, there is a photo copy. Cossus cossus guerrilla district (hence my), defined as the Cossus cossus dersu
In the article there is a seaside Cossus siniaevi, albeit in small molbiole image. size http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=220783&view=findpost&p=929454 In general, the question remained - or it Cossus cossus one of the DV-subspecies or Cossus orientalis.And, perhaps, Cossus siniaevi. Show special to am.

26.08.2015 20:58, Peter Khramov:

In general, functional expansion is planned, but it is not the primary task. Bo imagine that people without exception will need someone to ignore me for the time being difficult, but the cards have still not started guglovye, and much more important is waiting for their turn.Because - if there is really any necessary / important additions to drugs that are not expected - according to the subject, pokumekat.

26.08.2015 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you :)

26.08.2015 19:08, Alexander Belousov:

Basil did so! White females, males are dark, almost black.

26.08.2015 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, Theodore. Done.

26.08.2015 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #11942 group.

26.08.2015 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, they differ in color floors or not? I just throw their necessary :)

26.08.2015 19:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

It should be combined into a group with 11942

26.08.2015 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is correct and safe. At least the post office does not have to move. Thank you.
Peter, it would be desirable to know more about the planned functional "lichku."
In short: the standard functionality of forum lichku engine IPB: Mailbox Cleanup, Ignore / razignor individual recipients, etc. planned?

26.08.2015 16:19, Peter Khramov:

Instead, the line should just note the size in the comment to the photo. It will not disfigure Fautua and thus serve as a more accurate data.

26.08.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I knew Alexander. It's just a short substantiated :)
Here's how you measure a wingspan of up to a millimeter from sitting with folded wings of butterflies live in the wild - a mystery to me.
Another thing in the collection as a ruler and measured everything.
And then ..... It's fantastic some :)

26.08.2015 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I'm not with pritenziyami. :)
Yes, the dimensions here to help, but Peter does not like the line. :)

26.08.2015 15:36, Irina Nikulina:

Sash, I also thought that we have in schuetzeella are not they, what is written in June. But schuetzeella and abietella differ significantly for different razmerami- ist Cams at the first sweep of 21-27mm (on lepiforume max. Size given 24), while the second 27-33mm.With this summer took a habit to strangers and calmly seated butterfly record size, it is often useful, so at this and last staged in abietella magnitude 30-32. + Differenzialdiagnose transferred to lepiforume. In June, there was no time to deal with size.

26.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In this particular case, two views have been matched to the point postponed.

26.08.2015 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

This kind of image is problematic, I lookDioryctria schuetzeellado not, in my opinion, but will not touch.

26.08.2015 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dioryctria abietella / Confidently identified / Viktor Yepishin.

26.08.2015 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.08.2015 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.08.2015 14:13, Irina Nikulina:

Having dealt in detail, I agree with Victor -Dioryctria abietella

26.08.2015 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

? To very good, a lot of excess, especially from the unpleasant commentary, will go to the PM, where opponents can safely negotiate without complexes. :)))

26.08.2015 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deileptenia mandschuriaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.08.2015 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Now all the rules.
ZY Before full transition to insects such cases are possible, but this is not the norm, as well, that are reporting.

26.08.2015 12:53, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

26.08.2015 12:37, Irina Nikulina:

Deileptenia mandschuriaria

26.08.2015 11:36, Irina Nikulina:

Vaccination against encephalitis doing ... and what about the Lyme disease (borreliosis)?) Most unpleasant sore ((Shamil, strict lessons in dressing and sprinkling received any chemistry on the first visit)) three times are not saved, but the cost ..And this year, the second peak was strong, shaking and looked around - probably already precisely phobia))) Carried) I was in all months of the year, except in June, the most vivid impressions of the butterflies came out in July) And on the nature and the weather in August and September Great, too, if nothing swoops, like Goni from Taiwan) I was lucky as a whole,this year was leaving for the remains of Chan-Hom, arrived from China, but only on the last day of a reserve to the airport sailed ... :))) It's something ... but as usual the Far East) There's long-term forecasts are not working. But September is almost always wonderful! And May gorgeous when riotous bloom all!

26.08.2015 11:02, Shamil Murtazin:

From ticks need to dress well and be vaccinated. I also tick the region. All summer I find the most interesting places.
In some months, it is best to go to the Far East?

26.08.2015 10:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Today, not a link to the description of the species. Ie any reference to the type http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/ХХХХХ

26.08.2015 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, now is not working references to taxa. I can not go no where. Gluck or operating torque settings?

26.08.2015 10:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paradysstroma corussaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

26.08.2015 10:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paradysstroma corussaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

26.08.2015 10:18, Basil Sergienko:

This, too,

26.08.2015 10:05, Basil Sergienko:

I would suggest Paradysstroma curossaria

26.08.2015 9:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ornithoptera priamus Ornithoptera priamus urvillianus.

26.08.2015 9:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ornithoptera priamus Ornithoptera priamus poseidon.

26.08.2015 9:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ornithoptera priamus Ornithoptera priamus priamus.

26.08.2015 9:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.08.2015 9:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ornithoptera priamus Ornithoptera priamus arruana.

26.08.2015 9:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia / Irina Nikulina Eupithecia abietaria / Basil Sergienko.

26.08.2015 7:45, Alex Dumchus:

ssp urvillianus

26.08.2015 7:45, Alex Dumchus:

ssp poseidon

26.08.2015 7:45, Alex Dumchus:

ssp arruana,

26.08.2015 7:44, Alex Dumchus:

ssp priamus

26.08.2015 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter does not work in the general autosubstitution search.
So it is impossible to go to any page of the form. He writes for example is: "http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/5539 Page Not Found" Deal with the matter.
And people on the third-party resources to ask questions and meet other dyudi they reference. A link does not work here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php? showtopic = 559945 & view = findpost & p = 1574521 (non-working, but surely link to the site in the next post).

26.08.2015 3:34, Peter Khramov:

On the site the opportunity to write personal messages to other users, as well as to respond to them. To write a PM: go to the page and write to the user sootvetstvyuuschem window. View incoming and outgoing messages can be personal in Personal Area .To reply to a message - presses on the link next to him, go to the page the user to write to you and write the answer.
Notifications of new PM: At the top of any page after the reference to edit photos plus LC in the corresponding title. Later I'll be notified by e-mail.

25.08.2015 23:56, Peter Khramov:

Ok, removed.

25.08.2015 23:18, Irina Nikulina:

37808

25.08.2015 22:45, Peter Khramov:

?

25.08.2015 22:33, Irina Nikulina:

Reserves photo # 37788

25.08.2015 21:54, Irina Nikulina:

Again, thank you, Basil, I'll know. It is even better), online photo abietaria has not yet been

25.08.2015 21:46, Basil Sergienko:

It abietaria, have analoga palpi appear much more

25.08.2015 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Updated system ants, now it must be close to perfect. It remains only to connect sinoinmy and (probably) extinct species.

25.08.2015 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK

25.08.2015 21:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

Alexander, I think, that your copy - it's a male E. core godartii f. layardi (http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30270020.html)

25.08.2015 20:48, Alex Dumchus:

Why undetectable? Very define. Both males definable. Tomorrow will try to lay out different subspecies.

25.08.2015 20:47, Irina Nikulina:

Here help is needed -Eupithecia analoga? I do not know whether it is possible to distinguish the photo fromEupithecia abietaria?

25.08.2015 20:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

often grown Poseidon))) I think to subspecies without label neoredelyaem

25.08.2015 20:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is not a mistake, it was a typo, because of the rush. :)

25.08.2015 20:14, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, I already knew) But is not the case - I do families confused, zelёnenkoe saw - and in the school slapped)))) This blockage photos, decided to DV quickly Bohr put, in a hurry, not anymore) And Sasha generous me He regretted), for which he thanks!

25.08.2015 20:09, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, what kind of horror stories? :)) Do not scare people! It's not so terrible - typhoons, cottonmouth tongs quite perezhivayemost)) However, at the most, after '13 kleschefobiya still there to a certain extent))) ... interfere!) Shamil this year explored a place to stay)

25.08.2015 20:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tortrix viridana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.08.2015 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Irina, I remind you that if you can not nonche determination to species makes sense to put a definition to superspecies taxon (foty to knit these taxa).

25.08.2015 19:59, Irina Nikulina:

But when put, I hesitated)) I hasten) Thank you, Sasha!

25.08.2015 19:37, Alex Dumchus:

How about a photo 41345. I have a few caught in the winds and Tae. I'll lay out and check.

25.08.2015 19:35, Peter Khramov:

No problem. By 10 pm I will leave on Skype.

25.08.2015 19:13, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, most of these taxa thee there. But perhaps not in the same branch. See. Search.

25.08.2015 17:17, Leon Ortlieb:

Lays an egg.

25.08.2015 17:17, Yuri Semejkin:

By Hemiptera not see 1. Acanthosomatidae-Elasmostethus humeralis Jakovlev, 1883; 2. Reduviidae no Epidaus; Rhynocoris.
3. No Belostomatidae, Lygaeidae, Pentatomidae, Pyrrhocoridae, Urostylidae, Scutelleridae
From the above, it can be and others. Now is called ......

25.08.2015 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tonight Skype available? Somewhere after 22:00?

25.08.2015 16:40, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you're talking about Thomas, and I'm about Eremu. It will be an opportunity - Call the phone or let's agree skonnektit on Skype.

25.08.2015 16:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Call now I can not.
One thing I will say. Cerambycidae-fifth of the number of species of beetles and includes about 26 000 species.
For comparison: in order Lepidoptera 200 000 - 225 000 species (data from Wikipedia).
That is, the number of single-family is only approx. one-tenth the size of a unit Lepidoptera.
So let's quieter.And refers to normal when you offer help to understand though, would be in the same group. One you zamanaeshsya and writings can be practiced forever.

25.08.2015 16:16, Peter Khramov:

Basil, about Insectoids. Do you even know what is happening there and what questions I ask or not? And then the tribe, and where does the question of whether any classification or not there for you? The question is whether there are some problems, like the past once, when you do not have enough banal species / genera.And which tries all possible taxa to add your own bugs now, when the system is laid out as an example, without the final bindings?
Call the phone (you have right now, it is inaccessible), recently we are here in a row alien has just talk.

25.08.2015 15:44, Fedor Ovechkin:

Good!

25.08.2015 15:41, Fedor Ovechkin:

Alexander, in this photo and photo №42372 shows the same specimen, top and bottom view respectively. Indeed, if we do not take into account that there is a kind of Euploea orontobates Fruhstorfer, 1910, the most this instance resembles E. core. In determining the use of the following materials; http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30255001.html
Please note that it is the female (photo №42373) and a group of relatively large white spots on the front wing (top - 3, underside - 5). In E.core, like this is not observed.
In view of the link is given as Euploea conbuom Saito & Inayoshi, 2006.
I understand in taking on this website is the classification matches Euploea orontobates Fruhstorfer, 1910.It is interesting to know the opinion of experts in determining the accuracy of this instance.

25.08.2015 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm very confused.
In the gallery, and Luke all the rules. On the "authors" breshet.

25.08.2015 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Counter where? The LC?

25.08.2015 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Do not go to children
In Africa for a walk

25.08.2015 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Fedor, no problems with the transfer to ext. No gallery. Let's act on the reverse side: if there are questions / objections to the transfer has already taken place concrete pictures (and not necessarily their own), we write in the comments to them.

25.08.2015 14:28, Fedor Ovechkin:

This comment implies that the author does not object to the transfer of an additional photo in the gallery. The problem in fact is not far off!

25.08.2015 14:18, Peter Khramov:

http://insecta.pro/taxonomy

25.08.2015 13:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Counter photo still need to fix. I have it for a long time standing at around 2421 photos. but in fact there should be greater because I ship constantly.

25.08.2015 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Give a link :)

25.08.2015 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Restore the original determination after glitch gallery.

25.08.2015 13:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Oeneis urda / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.08.2015 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Oeneis urda / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.08.2015 13:28, Peter Khramov:

Today was a glitch, for about CHETRA hours is not plowed all related taxa on the site. Now it corrected.

25.08.2015 10:25, Peter Khramov:

So, I threw updated database.
It has some flaws (I will finish the ants, by itself, plus butterflies very much on the little things), but the main problem is the last option they decided - and beetles, bugs and not added taxa, including rather banal, which last time was not.Please go through the tree, and to confirm that the whole is now filling all the rules.
Leputroboska, dy!
Let us at this stage is filled with a look. For questions, where to get the classification of beetles and bugs in general, etc. - Later.
I am waiting for your comments.
ZYLooking at the time the insects are now better harvest enteritis, and not to use autosubstitution.

25.08.2015 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

One bablchka - one glass (not plastic) .morilka which threaded ethyl acetate. Ethyl acetate addition to being well zamarivaet is also a plasticizer: for insect chitin therefore been killed after his pairs well straightened.If not at hand will approach pure ethyl acetate and liquid nail polish remover without acetone, he replaced it usually ethyl acetate. "Weasel," etc. (must read part). Nails and human hair in essence the same chitin.
Very convenient for stain jars of coffee from under the "Moccona":

The design of this stain is described here: http: // molbiol.ru / forums / index.php? showtopic = 93228 & view = findpost & p = 1546897
If a butterfly raspravke subject - it is necessary to adhere to the system and forget the freezer.

25.08.2015 7:56, Alex Dumchus:

But this is more like a E.core

25.08.2015 7:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Irina, we are pleased arrival =)
In the Far East it is necessary to have regular expeditions to organize and expand the geography;) The next year - I am ready =)

25.08.2015 7:53, Alex Dumchus:

Fedor. Check out my 41345. Can the same form?

25.08.2015 6:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tatiana Selena Alexandr Zhakov.

25.08.2015 4:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Here too, the definition should be Alexander correct. The first definition of it.

25.08.2015 3:01, Peter Khramov:

Why would it something extra ...

24.08.2015 23:24, Shamil Murtazin:

And I, when it is not in the field, in the freezer throw =) conveniently. Just a lot of bottles is necessary.

24.08.2015 23:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mesoligia furuncula / Confidently identified / .

24.08.2015 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Plebejus / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.08.2015 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Plebejus / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.08.2015 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, it is the female of the genus Plebejus.

24.08.2015 23:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monopis monachella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

24.08.2015 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

24.08.2015 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sinarella punctalis / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

24.08.2015 19:45, Alex Dumchus:

In my collection arruana, poseidon, priamus and urvillianus. Priamus one to one, looked at sites remaining subspecies. In addition, it is most often grown in insectarium. I can lay out a photo, but a reluctance to score extra photos site. So these priamusov enough.

24.08.2015 18:19, Fedor Ovechkin:

Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition

24.08.2015 18:19, Fedor Ovechkin:

Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition

24.08.2015 18:18, Fedor Ovechkin:

Pelopidas mathias, imprecise definition

24.08.2015 16:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you Alexander! I did not think that this is determined by dribs and drabs.

24.08.2015 15:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Sinarella punctalis (Heiz, 1905) ?

24.08.2015 15:43, Leon Ortlieb:

Excellent shooting experience! Like.

Also somehow I like micro photography. He became interested in .. Butterflies
patterns are impressive. Here example of the kind caligo memnon: http://www.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn1.spiegel.de%2Fimages%2Fimage-126488-galleryV9-blxq.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Fwissenschaft%2Fnatur%2Finsekten-als-ueberlebenskuenstler-weltherrscher-aus-dem-ei-a-714694.html&h=618&w=850&tbnid=DkqN6RVc4jV1yM%3A&docid=XTRP9Qaqt7Ki2M&ei=0w3bVeW0NoORsAGWxJPwDQ&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=2046&page=1&start=0&ndsp=41&ved=0CFoQrQMwE2oVChMIper5_dvBxwIVgwgsCh0W4gTe
Taken Rastova electron microscope ..

More Dryas Julia caligo memnonwww.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn1.spiegel.de%2Fimages%2Fimage-126488-galleryV9-blxq.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Fwissenschaft%2Fnatur%2Finsekten-als-ueberlebenskuenstler-weltherrscher-aus-dem-ei-a-714694.html&h=618&w=850&tbnid=DkqN6RVc4jV1yM%3A&docid=XTRP9Qaqt7Ki2M&ei=0w3bVeW0NoORsAGWxJPwDQ&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=2046&page=1&start=0&ndsp=41&ved=0CFoQrQMwE2oVChMIper5_dvBxwIVgwgsCh0W4gTe

morpho peleides caligo memnonwww.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn1.spiegel.de%2Fimages%2Fimage-126488-galleryV9-blxq.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.spiegel.de%2Fwissenschaft%2Fnatur%2Finsekten-als-ueberlebenskuenstler-weltherrscher-aus-dem-ei-a-714694.html&h=618&w=850&tbnid=DkqN6RVc4jV1yM%3A&docid=XTRP9Qaqt7Ki2M&ei=0w3bVeW0NoORsAGWxJPwDQ&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=2046&page=1&start=0&ndsp=41&ved=0CFoQrQMwE2oVChMIper5_dvBxwIVgwgsCh0W4gTe

It is very beautiful, and there are still many ph .. But while I admire other people ..

Yet

24.08.2015 15:20, Leon Ortlieb:

Question .. Last time I put the male Polyommatus icarus, is now female, and to the underside with an almost-open wings. It seems to me now represented in the collection are .. Do I need to, and whether it makes sense to put this kind of still on different food plants (like here on the daisy) and the next.visits to other plant species, (color), on which it feeds? Of course not meaning just sat down to rest.

24.08.2015 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and how to define subspecies?

24.08.2015 12:25, Irina Nikulina:

He drove off, Dim, but close - to grow at Bohr Bohr altsinoev kirkazona))) It was possible !!!;) I will show later. And yet everything - Hello !!!) returned to Moscow yesterday, missed the site))) We have here, I look, plenty of innovations ...Not yet figured out what was going on, but I hope, for the benefit of all) LW photo while only scattered on the family was surprised count captured about 370-380 living species! ;) I do not know how many new, but it certainly will) is not yet where and how to define and set def.subfamily or to sort something hochetsya- who will dig it? ... So far, I managed to define what is easier - only 28 species hohlatok (but there is a question). So it is necessary to undertake thorough) I hope to help!)

24.08.2015 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Tholera decimalis / Confidently identified / Male / Shamil Murtazin.

24.08.2015 10:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Monopis monachella (Hubner, 1796) ?

24.08.2015 10:30, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

24.08.2015 10:19, Artem Strizhov:

This female Icarus?

24.08.2015 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They need to catch the light.
And stains from the screen to collect (net side).
And as soon calm down a little, breathing ethyl acetate, to stick her chest below a drop of ammonia insulin syringe.
And it's better not to postpone it indefinitely, and the right to fight :)

24.08.2015 10:08, Alexander Belousov:

Nimble they skotinku until Zamora already obbitsya manage. As they say - "how to convey, so as not to spill?"

24.08.2015 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander :)
Just here it is necessary to choose the right time when it is collected.
Now the way we, in the Ministry of Defense is just a time and there: fly to the light range for the most part almost nepolёtannye.

24.08.2015 9:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

24.08.2015 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Opigena polygona / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

24.08.2015 9:14, Shamil Murtazin:

There were three instances. I can lay out other photos. Necessary?..

24.08.2015 9:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you, Vasily =)

24.08.2015 9:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, yesterday (08/23/2015). Fingered pictures, find more "polurakurs"

24.08.2015 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Opigena polygona / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

24.08.2015 8:16, Basil Sergienko:

Opigena polygona

24.08.2015 7:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil you reload it later?

24.08.2015 7:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, in the subfamily Eublemminae not looking.

24.08.2015 7:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lophomilia flaviplaga / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

24.08.2015 7:32, Alexander Belousov:

Installation - super! Fresh! I still can not mount it properly. Mastery bow.

24.08.2015 5:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The reason for changing the definition of authorship served adjacent to the butterfly group, which yesterday was identified by Alexander.

24.08.2015 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tatiana Selena Alex Dumchus.

24.08.2015 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Peter. Now everything is fine.

24.08.2015 5:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

24.08.2015 5:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

24.08.2015 5:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

24.08.2015 3:26, Yuri Semejkin:

My opinion is that it Lophomilia flaviplaga (Warren, 1912). We have it, and in the 37 region Catalogue no. But she is.

24.08.2015 3:00, Vladimir Bobow:

Alexander, I myself saw and photographed this butterfly for the first time. I caught at night on a brick wall of the school, under the lamp and photographed at home, podmorennuyu. It can even help than ever to determine.

24.08.2015 2:57, Peter Khramov:

While in the specification or in the comments to the photos would prescribe that the hybrid, and when that section or under them have guessed, you can quickly find all foty and transfer section.

23.08.2015 23:52, Peter Khramov:

Problems with nepokazom links removed, the reference to Basil from editing groups also shown again. Vasily confirm.

23.08.2015 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh, just something people write, but I must do it. Gathered in order to bring and ambush.
Look, of course :)

23.08.2015 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Fixed for this and other photos where mogul appear the same problem.

23.08.2015 23:40, Peter Khramov:

With fotami corrected, now displays all the rules. As for the anchor links - I understand you.

23.08.2015 23:29, Shamil Murtazin:

the closest -Xestia ditrapezium, but it seems :(

23.08.2015 23:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Tholera decimalis?

23.08.2015 23:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Mesoligia furuncula?

23.08.2015 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Now foty all reduced to a size to fit into a rectangle 1280x768 pixels. With a decrease in image quality may be slightly reduced because program on the website pictures shakes worse than, for example, Photoshop. If you want that Fota did not change their size - will ship it directly to the amount specified above. Iemake it fit into a rectangle the size of 1280x768 (W x H).

23.08.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably because of this innovation is now, and not all kinds of photos are displayed on the right of this page?
Regarding the meaning of use: still do not think this is correct. There is enough for all the logic of information on the subspecies of the title, and only the reference should be to look at.

23.08.2015 23:03, Peter Khramov:

Leon, the Old ask about adding a page of the form (there special link available) rather than pictures on the page.

23.08.2015 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I'm asking here is "Where have I gone this functionality unhoped - (((" unsubscribe only in the system area. With the TZ average user personal unexpectedly moderators can not happen.
In the case of same - a request understand, look, what's the matter.

23.08.2015 23:00, Peter Khramov:

No, this is not a technical glitch. INFA of subtypes we currently displayed in the pages of the relevant species and to link. And what of information that can be a little - so even for species not all descriptions are available.

23.08.2015 22:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Here, too, lost a link to view a photo :(

23.08.2015 22:47, Shamil Murtazin:

Apparently, the same as http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42158

23.08.2015 20:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae Spialia galba.

23.08.2015 20:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae Spialia galba.

23.08.2015 20:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae Spialia galba.

23.08.2015 20:26, Fedor Ovechkin:

Spialia galba

23.08.2015 20:26, Fedor Ovechkin:

Spialia galba

23.08.2015 20:26, Fedor Ovechkin:

Spialia galba

23.08.2015 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, now substantially delivered me a question. So it should be?
If it's a technical glitch - it is necessary to fix :))

23.08.2015 19:16, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, it seems to me that we are conducting "talk about anything".
Bull's-eye.

23.08.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Smasibo Alexander.
Clear. Based on the current situation with insects, it seems a long time ....
Well-well. Sit "without hands" ((

23.08.2015 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudopostega auritella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.08.2015 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vladimir, well, a little problem, I have family I can not carry. :)

23.08.2015 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander seems to me that we are conducting "talk about anything".
If the link is meant to mean the form in it and needs to be established even if the page type can be infa subspecies. A page ultimately belongs mind not subspecies.
There are separate pages subspecies - are appropriate and links indicating the subspecies.There are also links-figuratively speaking incorrect.
I am sure many will not like it if we pay attention, and not me alone.

23.08.2015 17:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I Perth said:
17.08.2015 0:08, Petr Khramov
Well yes. This framework is not a new ustakanilos where butterflies along with other insect would. Ie before the launch of the insects.

23.08.2015 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae Lampides boeticus.

23.08.2015 15:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lycaenidae Lampides boeticus.

23.08.2015 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I had disappeared from the form on which I tied / untied photo in the group. Please go back.
There are occasions when we need it, but can not do anything.

23.08.2015 15:09, Fedor Ovechkin:

Invalid combined into a group with photo # 19833

23.08.2015 14:49, Leon Ortlieb:

Nicholas, if you want to know those people in person, please visit the museum http://www.insecta-web.org/MWM/
on the left side of the column, the word museum will add. Column Wissenschaftler, click and you'll see many Russian names. If they know, they talk more than I ..

However, it must be so, internationally.And dividing by Pindos Pindos or is not present among normal individuals. This jargon might come out and be acceptable for a restaurant, but not for thinking people.

If you go down Virtuele Sammlungen, it explains that the digitization of collections held by Ukrainians and so on.
A lot of things that interesting ..

23.08.2015 14:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

Lampides boeticus

23.08.2015 14:22, Fedor Ovechkin:

Lampides boeticus

23.08.2015 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Granted, Basil, but on the pages of the form we have is often information about the subspecies. And subspecies are listed there, and certainly with the authors, so no trouble. But really why in some cases in view of the other subspecies.

23.08.2015 14:14, Leon Ortlieb:

Please use google translator and try to translate https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum_Witt
There is that 50 of the dead lepidepteriologov left their collections.
Currently, watch over 30 scientists. (Part of the foreign guests).
Many expeditions have been conducted on the territory of the former USSR. (and consequently there is in the collection).
But you yourself read moving text.

23.08.2015 13:54, Shamil Murtazin:

Hmm ... With white balance bedaaa. Waiting substitution photo :)

23.08.2015 13:53, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, by the way, and shows the technical infa about the substitution photos? It would be helpful just in case.

23.08.2015 13:24, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I wonder who are these millions of counting?))

23.08.2015 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, if it were separate pages were then subspecies, would be unprincipled.
If there are no pages and all links are on the page of the form it means that they should be called the same, not differently.
Here "Description Trogonoptera brookiana trogon"
And here; http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30810 "Description Trogonoptera brookiana albescens"
But in the end both links lead to one place to the form.On the basis of this really necessary to link all called simply "Description Trogonoptera brookiana"

23.08.2015 11:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I think it does not matter, go to the page type, or where there is a description or just a subspecies name. But basically, you're right, it should be uniformity. :)

23.08.2015 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And there is now a reference reads: "Description Trogonoptera brookiana trogon ", and leads to the description of the species.
Why subspecies of a link in the registers? It should not be

23.08.2015 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2015 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2015 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2015 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2015 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2015 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2015 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2015 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the authors of the subspecies are on the page of the form, I think now might have to remove the name of a subspecies of a string clarify taxonomy.
Yes, I'm in the system area, I wrote that there was a glitch, it's not only the subspecies and the species. there is no link to the page of the form.

23.08.2015 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trogonoptera brookiana Trogonoptera brookiana albescens.

23.08.2015 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trogonoptera brookiana Trogonoptera brookiana albescens.

23.08.2015 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trogonoptera brookiana Trogonoptera brookiana albescens.

23.08.2015 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trogonoptera brookiana Trogonoptera brookiana albescens.

23.08.2015 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Trogonoptera brookiana Trogonoptera brookiana trogon.

23.08.2015 10:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From the top of the line did not remove anything since subspecies of a different description and year avtorsva unlike nominative.
In my opinion it can not be neglected)
Peter, after the transfer to the subspecies is missing a reference to the description of the species. Correct, please.This link will be Dolna every photo, regardless of what is shown on it nenominativny subspecies.

23.08.2015 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Arhopala pseudocentaurus Arhopala pseudocentaurus nakula.

23.08.2015 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Arhopala pseudocentaurus Arhopala pseudocentaurus nakula.

23.08.2015 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

23.08.2015 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

23.08.2015 10:00, Leon Ortlieb:

Russian name was be- Pale meadow moth. (Not shown on the website).

23.08.2015 9:54, Leon Ortlieb:

Thank you, Alexander !!

23.08.2015 9:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon sachalinensis.

23.08.2015 9:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon sachalinensis.

23.08.2015 9:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sitochroa palealis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.08.2015 8:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Sitochroa palealis / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.08.2015 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, is a question to Peter. I know not of these cases.

23.08.2015 0:06, Leon Ortlieb:

So I boldly put, and genus and species .. Gluck which received .. Do not worry ..
Basil, explain please, what boot here on the site as the pictures are losing? Loading 1000 pixels on the wide side, and the picture is reduced and the quality is lost .. Why so ??

22.08.2015 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, could be safely put in females. This form is only for females.
I think that if you know the form - you know, and kind :)
It is strange why she stood uncertain.

22.08.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Argynnis paphia / Female / Leon Ortlieb.

22.08.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Argynnis paphia / Female / Leon Ortlieb.

22.08.2015 21:37, Leon Ortlieb:

I think that this kind of tvarinka Udea, but the Internet did not find closer ..
Go to the Witte Museum in Munich, where he collected 10 million moths nor desire nor makes no sense .. (There many leading lepidopterist country dying bequeathed their collections.)
And it is very far to go to Munich .. And I want to know what it is ..
Can anyone help?

22.08.2015 11:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Another found the same :)

22.08.2015 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ornithoptera priamus priamus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

22.08.2015 7:11, Alex Dumchus:

Ornithoptera priamus priamus, female

21.08.2015 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.08.2015 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhodometra sacraria Casilda antophilaria.

21.08.2015 18:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, there's a new bug, when you come to a page of photos of some, there is no " Description Genus specias " Example:
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40108
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26713
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42316
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42314

21.08.2015 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Basil Sergienko.

21.08.2015 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Basil Sergienko.

21.08.2015 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Basil Sergienko.

21.08.2015 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago / Alexandr Zhakov Male / Basil Sergienko.

21.08.2015 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Basil Sergienko.

21.08.2015 14:16, Artem Strizhov:

thank

21.08.2015 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.08.2015 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.08.2015 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.08.2015 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.08.2015 9:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

21.08.2015 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tom, on the link at the bottom of a page table to determine the species Argynnis
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Argynnis_Niobe

21.08.2015 6:42, Artem Strizhov:

I thought Niobe

21.08.2015 6:39, Artem Strizhov:

Large tortoiseshell black and red

20.08.2015 23:02, Leon Ortlieb:

He arrested her and planted tomato sheets in a cell. Maybe someday it hatches. Like the caterpillar of garden shovels? Or anyone else that sees to the caterpillar?

20.08.2015 22:08, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, you can not just straight right now (with the launch of a small rocky obstructions insects). If in a few days I will not do - remind.

20.08.2015 21:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I want to replace it, and a couple of photos (to add the underside and that they are not very different to each other). You can arrange? .. =)

20.08.2015 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis xanthomelas / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

20.08.2015 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis xanthomelas / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

20.08.2015 20:10, Alexander Belousov:

He is!

20.08.2015 20:03, Igor Sakhno:

Maybe, after all, ksantomelas?

20.08.2015 14:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mesapamea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.08.2015 13:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.08.2015 13:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.08.2015 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Damophila / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk.

20.08.2015 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archiearis parthenias / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.08.2015 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archiearis parthenias / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.08.2015 11:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you! Did not know.

20.08.2015 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Podmarennikovy and Wine average colors of willow-herb hawala at the last stage)))

20.08.2015 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

The picture seems really plant Lactuca sp. (By the way on the page type of error in the genus name: Salad (Latuca)). Let's hope that this Kukula. Gusenichka small, it has grown to grow and grow.
But about hawk moths, so they eat flowers before pupation heard. Vasily about what kinds do you write?

20.08.2015 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. prorsa Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 11:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana.

20.08.2015 10:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The subspecies is unlikely Lee. Butterfly has 3 forms.
Yes, and the view is very variable in color. Most likely this is due, and.

20.08.2015 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana f. porima.

20.08.2015 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is Alexander. I missed in this volume.
I bear :)

20.08.2015 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hyles so often done before will pupate. Like Kukula not know. If so, then the last age, and is, an automaton.
Just wondering.

20.08.2015 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not f. porima?

20.08.2015 10:14, Shamil Murtazin:

Still, eating whole flower.

20.08.2015 10:12, Shamil Murtazin:

I used to think that it Pandemis =)

20.08.2015 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

And before that it was not like? :)))

20.08.2015 9:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Now it seems to be true :)

20.08.2015 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

20.08.2015 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pandemis dumetana / Shamil Murtazin Philedone gerningana / Ilia Ustiantcev.

20.08.2015 9:22, Leon Ortlieb:

Thanks Basil! I know. Only, perhaps, different subtypes? Or?

20.08.2015 8:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I do not understand what there kollazhik draw. I mean, you can just substantively discuss the numbers of photos. Or do something else waiting for?
Drew plate as an example. Just a person perceives the information not as a string, ielook at the photos does not slide in line with the text, and if you do not start to allocate one line, it is likely that the user will not even notice them. Just wanted to demonstrate the principle. I am confident because the information is perceived better.
Regarding withdrawal of the photo. The mass of options.At least in every line display a certain type of pictures.
... well, I guess I figure out how to cope with this scourge, coupled with rubber design. You tell us what you expect from the main gallery, because you as if something do not finish =)

Basil, options like volatile species are - weight.It is possible, for example, more lines do with straightened.
P.S. More useful in my head is spinning - when you hover over the icon in the main gallery of photos on the page of the form to display the type of photos, such as "female underside".

20.08.2015 6:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana f. levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 6:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.08.2015 6:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 6:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 6:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 6:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 5:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 5:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 5:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 5:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 5:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. porima.

20.08.2015 5:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. prorsa.

20.08.2015 5:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. porima.

20.08.2015 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.08.2015 5:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Araschnia levana Araschnia levana f. levana.

20.08.2015 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is. In Europe, there are no other species. Leon, did not hesitate

20.08.2015 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Araschnia levana f. prorsa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.08.2015 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, the number of photons in a row varirutesya depending on the width of the browser window. In FullHD five. And on the other resolutions - not five. Design the rubber.
On your plate: two lines on the imago preimaginvalnye else on stage - not too much right? The formal separation of the bottom, top, etc. It will work when the pictures are always in abundance.But for most species the situation is reversed - many cells will be empty.
At this stage, I do not find opportunities for formal and as objective as sample pictures even for itself the first gallery, not to mention the priority areas and locations in the "table."Because I put the question a little differently:
How would you sostavm first and second gallery (if changed)? Reduce the number of photons, some removed, or, on the contrary, they added. And why. You can even nafotoshopit who is able, for the gallery kollazhik swallowtail explanation.

19.08.2015 22:30, Daria Milkova:

Basil, I hope!

19.08.2015 22:10, Leon Ortlieb:

Not a healthy interest in sex ... (Spider looks out from under the sheet).

19.08.2015 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They are pests, Daria.
Fortunately, they are not always plentiful, and occasionally, when there are flashes of the form.
The next year, so many of them probably will not be.

19.08.2015 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil and intraspecific variability in how to deal with?
For example, ourCosmia trapezinaandOrthosia incertasame does not happen. Even I do not know sometimes what color considered typical. And a lot of these kinds :)

19.08.2015 22:02, Daria Milkova:

This year we have a lot of butterflies of the species. Females lay eggs literally everywhere - even on the clothes, if you sit under the lamp included. This is not good, how do I know? After all, they are pests.

19.08.2015 21:50, Shamil Murtazin:

May I once again from the standpoint of optimal and convenient location will answer? =)
In general, it is now more convenient. That does not take away. Thanks.
Again it is assumed that the purpose of browsing - to look at what kind of beast - Swallowtail. Or, perhaps, to define - I caught the swallowtail.
Question about five photos in the "matrix" of thumbnails.Why five? The logic should be even, it is good to get up the top-angles underside, top, side, etc. In general, an ideal - a multiple of 4.
Also I propose to fill each row of photographs of the same type. Line - in view of the nature, the line - straightened.
(5 minutes passed feigning on paper)
In general, I think.It turns out this matrix is ​​approximately:

Lines offer or order "historicity" positioning (egg-gusyanka cocoon-pupa-to-nature straightening), or as being wanted in the definition. The second option would then need to change the order of some taxa.
The last three lines - variation.

19.08.2015 17:51, Mihail Nyzhnikov: This species is identified correctly.

19.08.2015 16:41, Peter Khramov:

Different people need different sample. And another opportunity to hurt nobody. As for the technical part - the sample well subspecies check glitches in the binding.
Imprecisely to the genus and family can be exactly the same as before the species. Like, that's the kind of, but not 100% sure.Not with regards to the theme - as I wrote above, the tree taxa need to rectify, this is no argument there. Well, if the question is not on the site, and in technology in general, then, even if some know how to spell the genus, Google it. Googol substitute similar options, and the site can not seek similarity with a ready way.

19.08.2015 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not kosaemo theme. But where to look for kind, if in the family there? climb deeper, subfamily, tribe, subtribe and find I can not use because they do not know how to kind of spell. :)

19.08.2015 16:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree, look, it does not depend on the binding. The question is, why you might need to sample some subspecies? And how could it be inaccurate determination of the genus and family. Probably I should really uhotit of imprecisely defined.

19.08.2015 16:16, Peter Khramov:

And what kind of look in the tribes / subtribe? And why go to the genus (in the context of the topic)?
With regards to the imperfections - of course, you have to edit things, but it is not dependent on the binding / neprivyazki to taxa ph.

19.08.2015 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.08.2015 16:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

An example of perfection catalog: Lemonia born in the family. Brahmaeidae, and this and that. Lemoniidae separately. If I determined to seed. the genus I shall come or does not.
The revelers after podsemeyst all so confusing, knowing that the race to find him in the tribes, subtribe lot of hard work.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.08.2015 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

19.08.2015 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon syriacus.

19.08.2015 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Just now some changes appointment of the second line ("Update"). Now, to write:
1. Shapes, morphs, etc. (as before)
2.Subspecies only if the site is not yet wound up appropriate subspecies, and therefore it is impossible to snap a photo directly (before the subspecies does not tied, so always wrote subtypes, regardless of whether the desired site).
Do you agree?

19.08.2015 14:50, Peter Khramov:

1. The right to block 3 times used Ideopsis sp. And now we presented all together, instead Ideopsis sp there is not written to certain species of the genus.
2. To all register for a program you need to specify the names of all taxa in the genitive (genus - genus, etc.)
3. In general, our users can be divided into 2 groups.First - people who are more or less aware of the Latin, the tree zootaksonov, binomial and sp. Second - people who do not know or have heard about all of the above just too vaguely. I believe that people who even know what was meant by "kind Ideopsis», understand and what Ideopsis sp., Especially in the context of those pages where such designation is used.
And let's have already agreed that the site is in the first place for people (and with them), that a keen interest in our theme, and aware of the use of Latin.Yes, we consider (and most welcome and respect) members of the group "found / found a caterpillar in the country, tell me, what kind of a fly," but not enough to register all the necessary explanations in the interface is not 3 times and 5.
ZY A glossary, FAQ, and other areas with the work on the site, of course, necessary. Here I support the idea of ​​Basil.In insects are definitely going to implement.

19.08.2015 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the search ph determined to intermediate taxa, there are no problems. Now the gallery has a corresponding sample. Ie if we know the tribe, the tribe, and to carry, no need to be limited to family / subfamily. And there is no need to think that "the person who can." People are different, the situation is different. Well, he came to the kind of means that are not reached.The sense in simply no restrictions. If you do have - write more, it is good to a concrete example.
Regarding inaccurate - continue the discussion.

19.08.2015 14:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Kindergarten some you lit here))) About sp.- one who does not know what it is, and he does not understand! On the other hand, one who does not know what it is - and the view from the gallery will not be able to determine sp !!! Just if you write "undetermined species of the genus to species" instead of sp, all "inhabitants" would be clearer what it is. And for many ordinary people here advocated)))

19.08.2015 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil again and slowly repeat. And here geography? I about it and not say a word.
You did not like sp. and you decided to translate it and replace. I said that it is appropriate to change the other cuts in foreign languages ​​in the Russian text, you began to talk about labels. I tried to return the conversation to the site, you criticize geography.I brought Russian proverb, about that. that the two interlocutors, talking about various things, and briefly summarized their views. I was somewhere not correct? or inconsistent? Where categorical? I expressed one opinion and one. You began to publish in large letters, the discussion in the network is a cry! Why did it happen?

19.08.2015 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

God be with him, to the beach, of course. It is on those occasions when it is possible to specify: means it is necessary to specify. Laos I have no such possibility (I will not explain the reasons).
Dmitry, if you have noticed a majority of photos (which he collected) I have given data to the maximum.

19.08.2015 14:06, Peter Khramov:

But who and how will note that they are different species? Prog, after all, is unknown, different or not they are different. She knows only that the determination to superspecies taxon, not to the species, and it adds an automatic "sp".

19.08.2015 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Actually, the main foty (2 pcs.) All go in the text description. A further - in the form of small thumbnails, so I think, up to 30 pcs. Plus / minus and determining rules. Ie all before his eyes, and stage / angles at the same time more or less different. Consequently, and to determine all bad.30 - the number is not hard now to get this compromise as a first approximation.
In general, in order swallowtail (whose cloud pictures) and made out to discuss a specific example, who is to be believed. Here's Shamil, really too much fot now, and they interfere with the form on the page?

19.08.2015 13:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! What for you to the beach? You won with Laos in general are not the label hung)))

19.08.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

19.08.2015 12:45, Alexander Zhakov
Culture discussion:

Sledutset this.
19.08.2015 11:35, Alexander Zhakov
I'm talking about Thomas, and you're about Eremu. Title change is not necessary.

Alexander, that's so categorical and claiming one opinion And this blog as your culture and work.

19.08.2015 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov
I should be the headline.
(again, the same is generated categorical your post)
Indications are that the title should be changed to match the two opinions: Dmitry and my :)
Certainly not over yet, and the discussion continues.

19.08.2015 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, well, that's one to "Beach Doclet" that was immediately clear without resorting to Google.
I for example in Vietnam was not (as many): wherefore I know not, what it represents the Doclet :)

19.08.2015 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

My question is a little to the side :)
Peter, why are not shown in the photo 38,991 Ideopsis, only 4 photo Ideopsis sp.

19.08.2015 13:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Something I had lost the thread of the dispute)))

19.08.2015 13:02, Alex Dumchus:

I do not understand, Vasily. Are you think that under this kind geogr.infy enough? I'm not worried over the latitude and longitude in the tropics and do not carry a navigator, and so in the heat of forty enough net, box, photo, water bottles. And I do not need it. And who wants that will find in Google. There Doclet Beach only 8 km long. A range from butterflies, almost all yuvaziya

19.08.2015 12:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Culture debate:
19.08.2015 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov
However, it obsuzhdamoe.
19.08.2015 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov
I should be the headline.

19.08.2015 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That Dmitry offered essentially the same thing as I: "Pictures are not certain kind of _____ to type" is the same meaning as "indeterminate species Photo Ideopsis".
Dmitry, thank you for your support :)
Alexander, the title must be changed.

19.08.2015 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm talking about Thomas, and you're about Eremu. Title change is not necessary.

19.08.2015 11:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, probably still need to write "Photo not certain kind of _____ to form"

19.08.2015 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh well, let everyone writes as he sees geography: the material on the site author.
Alexander, if you think that geography no sokrashennyh explanations for the butterfly under discussion which carries a fine and clear all the information I applaud you. It's just the example did not have far to walk)))

19.08.2015 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, it is not about labels, but a site where space saving is not necessary, and it is bilingual. and which comes to a large Number of people who has no idea about these entomological widgets. Science, this site does not give, this is unscientific.A label under the butterflies look only entomologists, these cuts they are clear and in any language and location there is really need to save. :)

19.08.2015 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, then you have to enter on the site Dictionary Latin common terms that are used throughout the world in entomology, regardless of the language in which the label is written. I believe that there is no need to enter a Latin transliteration of Russian letters on the labels. If it is written leg. once it is clear who has collected :)
So labels are written here: http: //www.zin.ru / Animalia / Coleoptera / rus / miamarkm.htm
Rules (which is not) the same for beetles and butterflies.

19.08.2015 10:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Before podsemeystva- good, but it is too precarious a thing as a taxon. Prior to roll, and the family is enough. I think the person who can define up to subfamilies, reach and kind.

Well, the worst option, the author of the definition of a fig does not know and vanities like the first race. We may very well be so. Trite and confuse species and race.- This is generally not a criterion !!!
Criteria twenty genital types and can not see the distinctive prizdnakov pictured (top or underside)

19.08.2015 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily right or left as it was with the elimination of "Other photos of Papilio machaon ussuriensis"
Or remove the line from the bottom of the subspecies. Then the author subspecies long look, and what to do if the form on the page are not spelled subspecies?

19.08.2015 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

A variant such as the: "sp.1", "sp.2", "sp.3", when it is evident that the different types, but can not find the name or form is not yet described. Genital only "sp."

19.08.2015 10:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, here are a few is not the case, given the genus name in Latin and the abbreviated name of "view", also in Latin sp. All is well, and so on all sites. Who does not understand that and it is not clear what it means "Photos indeterminate species Ideopsis" Your amendment rather refers to the Russian text with a Latin abbreviation: leg., Det. :)))

19.08.2015 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter need to rename this small gallery. Outlined his version here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/38992

19.08.2015 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pay attention.
Do-it even need to write the name of the subspecies in the second row if it is now possible to immediately put a subspecies? Upstairs, above the photo is now somehow not so it turns out: unnecessary duplication of information to anything.
I did not remove from the top line. I am waiting for reviews

19.08.2015 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Two criteria to determine the type of:
1. The types of genital photo is not defined.
2. The author does not know the definition of a number of species of the genus, and their images have no place to look.
Well, the worst option, the author of the definition of a fig does not know and vanities like the first race. We may very well be so. Trite and confuse species and race.Dmitry says good head agree, no heart, not habitually, have become accustomed to catch at Solomenka imprecise definition. Can we keep this in mind for the future? and it is certainly necessary to reduce the number of definitions to the taxon: genus, family, well, can still subfamily.and even so deal with the catalog, even knowing it is practically impossible (terrible confusion), will also be with the pictures above to determine the type, they just can not find. :(

19.08.2015 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Kukula, they are, like to eat the reproductive organs of plants.

19.08.2015 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomographa bimaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.08.2015 9:10, Shamil Murtazin:

It seems fed flower sepals (no petals all that, and maybe them). Interesting love =)

19.08.2015 9:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Starting from the intermediate target directory as a determinant. To do this on the page of the form as possible fewer photos illustrate all the stages of development of the species. Approximately so, notionally, I imagined.
Is realized will now be displayed in the main gallery of no more than 30 pictures?

19.08.2015 9:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

19.08.2015 9:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Male / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Male / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Male / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Artem Strizhov.

19.08.2015 9:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

19.08.2015 8:25, Alexander Belousov:

Argynnis adippe

19.08.2015 8:25, Alexander Belousov:

Argynnis adippe♂ Tom, you're right.

19.08.2015 8:25, Alexander Belousov:

Argynnis adippe

19.08.2015 8:25, Alexander Belousov:

Argynnis adippe

19.08.2015 7:34, Artem Strizhov:

female, right?

19.08.2015 7:33, Artem Strizhov:

male, probably?

19.08.2015 7:32, Artem Strizhov:

and it adippa. Yes?

19.08.2015 7:31, Artem Strizhov:

However adippa probably

19.08.2015 7:31, Artem Strizhov:

I think it adippa

19.08.2015 6:48, Artem Strizhov:

I think happened.

19.08.2015 3:15, Peter Khramov:

And what would be a plus further reduction? On average, it is more or less removed.

19.08.2015 2:17, Shamil Murtazin:

I think it is necessary to decrease the number of photos in the main gallery. For example, two or three top-dried underside, two or three of the nature of the top-underside, and as the pupa, the caterpillar egg. At the end of some photo features. Either the specific features of the steps of the tail chrysalis butterfly pattern on the chest, etc.

19.08.2015 1:27, Peter Khramov:

1. From supraspecific taxa are now under the list of child elements displayed a mini-gallery of photos that have not been identified to species, but only to the current taxon. If you see something, which can make the update, go to the page of photos and leave a comment there appropriate.
2.Updated sort of "other pictures of the same taxon" on page photo and "pictures of this kind of" on the page of the form. Order now goes as follows: 1. taxon (true when one list are foty species and subspecies), 2. floor / stage of development, 3. load time to the site.Now navigate in the mini-galleries will be even more convenient (and when rassortiruem foty the first and second gallery, then all come communism). Previously, there was only sorting by date of publication on the site.

19.08.2015 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Divided fotyPapilio machaoninto primary and secondary galleries. Take a look, tell me who thinks that.
Main criteria: stage subspecies raskursy, normal quality, geography.

19.08.2015 0:49, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon ussuriensis.

19.08.2015 0:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon ussuriensis.

19.08.2015 0:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon ussuriensis.

19.08.2015 0:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon ussuriensis.

19.08.2015 0:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon ussuriensis.

19.08.2015 0:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio machaon Papilio machaon ussuriensis.

19.08.2015 0:39, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with other photos from the same individual. Vasily confirm.

19.08.2015 0:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.08.2015 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Artem, in the Personal Area is a function of a bunch of photos of individuals. If you take the top and underside of the wings and tie them together, I think, the kind will be determined very quickly.

19.08.2015 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's fine. Thank you, Peter :)
Just left my rename it title from the "Photos Ideopsis sp." in "Photos indeterminate species Ideopsis"
Still, life in general and I think that most people simply do not know what is the Latin abbreviation for sp. It will be immediately clear to everyone in my opinion.However, it obsuzhdamoe.

18.08.2015 23:51, Peter Khramov:

No "folders" then, of course not.
On business. Who made as follows.
For example, photos Ideopsis sp .:
1. Page One photo Ideopsis sp .: the right will go the other foty Ideopsis sp., As well as a link to all the pictures Ideopsis sp. in large size on a single page. At the same time everywhere and anywhere Pista, it Ideopsis sp.Therefore confusion due to the fact that it may be different species should not occur.
2. The kind of page Ideopsis .: beneath subsidiaries taxa gallery is small thumbnails of all photos Ideopsis sp., As well as a link to all the pictures Ideopsis sp. in large size on a single page.

18.08.2015 22:53, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. Okay, who else thinks that on inaccurate? Demitra zёrny sow doubt.

18.08.2015 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Theoretically, the folder is already there. In her writing.
Just have to like folders located on the page sorts:

18.08.2015 20:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

On the page you need to kind of make a folder sp

18.08.2015 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Typically, in such a case they should fall on the page sorts separately rather than creating a separate page where they fall all together despite the fact that it is very likely different kinds of butterflies
Peter, if it is technically possible, it is necessary to be implemented. Unusually .....

18.08.2015 20:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Collected kind used on thistles. And what part she eats? .. Brought the upper part of the stem with flowers. Something does not eat (We think that sheds.

18.08.2015 19:49, Alex Dumchus:

On the page of the form, I have seen. And that's kind of on the page no. Disorder.

18.08.2015 19:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, it's not on the page kind, and on the page of photos, t. E. This right: 4 photos of the same kind, to a certain kind.

18.08.2015 19:32, Artem Strizhov:

It adippa?

18.08.2015 19:30, Alex Dumchus:

Vasiily explain where on the page kind of "Other photos Ideopsis"

18.08.2015 19:29, Svetlana Shchavelina:

№41333 and №41334 - double

18.08.2015 19:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

This double 41333

18.08.2015 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis Neptis hylas.

18.08.2015 19:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and where it is now the top search?

18.08.2015 19:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would like to see the last instar caterpillar :)

18.08.2015 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She Flight in July (in one generation, respectively).
The long wait if you have to do everything as it should be.
You can experiment when pupate put into the refrigerator, but somewhere in December and January to get it and soon to be imago.
Who fodder plant species to add)))

18.08.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But the right and the right to search. More photos Ideopsis is called :)
Of course it is not good (((
It is necessary, as rightly noted Dmitry to certain to fall directly into the kind of race to which they are defined, and nowhere else.

18.08.2015 18:20, Alex Dumchus:

Well, yes, I support Dmitry where to look for something?

18.08.2015 16:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

He went into the race Ideopsis. I did not understand where certain kinds ONLY to hang? Let's say I'm an expert on this idiotisam, entered the race, looked all gud. Neoprelennyh to species not (((

18.08.2015 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, I do not much can not stand waiting for feeding :)
On our site there is not only synonymous, but species names and generic combinations were under any kind of scientific publications.

18.08.2015 15:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Well, I agree that went not fully understood. Then the question about the division on our website and synonyms Cucullia lactucae Cucullia pustulata.
Caterpillar taken on the feeding of;)

18.08.2015 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Shamil Murtazin.

18.08.2015 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Shamil Murtazin.

18.08.2015 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, with these kinds of problem before they greatly confused with each other. Who is considered to be two good species Cucullia lactucae and Cucullia pustulata, which has two subspecies fraterna eastern and western pustulata, but the tracks they are very similar. Besides the photos are small caterpillars. I was in such a network for these two species are not found, and from an adult, they are very different.Therefore Savchuk and just assumed it. :)

18.08.2015 15:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! Shamil earlier definition have, and I just came to the same opinion, but later. So put determined the Murtazina!

18.08.2015 15:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander types listed after the slash, because (as I understand) Systematics no ustakanilos. We have the same Cucullia lactucae established as a synonym for Cucullia pustulata. Yes, my somewhat liberty, but attributed to the very "top" = synonym) to priority in determining not apply.

18.08.2015 14:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander look can view known.

18.08.2015 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ideopsis vulgaris Neptis.

18.08.2015 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2015 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, this is a mistake.

18.08.2015 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil Savchuk suggested two types, and you put in an accurate one. It's not right, right turns to nature. And then the question of authorship or Murtazin Savchuk?
In the first race mobiole have Murtazin. Means and opreelenie it. :) Just before the race.

18.08.2015 14:28, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Wow ... And that's exactly be here ???

18.08.2015 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anarta trifolii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2015 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cochylis posterana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2015 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2015 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha rosaceana / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

18.08.2015 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha rosaceana / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

18.08.2015 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thetidia smaragdaria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

18.08.2015 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thetidia smaragdaria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

18.08.2015 14:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Still in editing it is not so simple turned out. I do not know why, but sometimes it turns out like this:

The assumption - the unit is slightly increased in height because of the text in the comments field.

18.08.2015 13:48, Shamil Murtazin:

Comments to the definition: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526325&view=findpost&p=1572986
Add a photo of black dots: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42271
I propose to move in exact.

18.08.2015 13:29, Shamil Murtazin:

Can someone clarify or so inaccurate to leave? ..

18.08.2015 13:18, Shamil Murtazin:

With uploading the picture is not stored set value in the "Stages of development / sex" is reset to the imago.

18.08.2015 12:20, Shamil Murtazin:

With formatting on the main too clever by half. If the photo in the upper left corner of the vertical orientation (width is less than the height), the Saturnia go up.

18.08.2015 12:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Until kind))) and will be 100% correct opredelnnye.
Open gallery inaccurate ph, 1438 pieces out there now, do you think that for all of them as the alleged infa carries no payload SHALL NOT BE

18.08.2015 12:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, they are the same group, it is one and the same instance (simply said).

18.08.2015 11:54, Peter Khramov:

How is it determined the surname does not bear the load? It responsible for determining, with him to ask why, they say, have decided that it is, and not something out, etc. If this right is not explicitly specified, then the people will feel that determined who was shooting, and it is often not the case.And under fotoy in comments is not always evident, and most importantly - not all guess look.
Inaccurate:
In this fote (or general appearance) the type of undetectable and no additional. infa such as geography does not help. Then, of course, we set up the genus / subgenus.But there are also intermediate or even another thing the situation:
- For this fote undetectable, but near the sea sfotat other individuals who have defined views
- View undetectable in appearance, but can be relatively easily judged by geography / location
- Determine the type, but determining not 100% sure
What can I say, open a gallery inaccurate ph,1438 pieces there now, do you think that for all of them as the alleged infa carries no payload that can be put to their kind, and nothing it does not lose anything?

18.08.2015 11:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What's the difference who identified? Surname determine not carry any load! And under the photo you can read all versions or to see who defined.
Regarding inaccurate opredeleniya- need to use a different formulation (Kind of photo undetectable, genital differences, etc.) If a species distinguishable habitually, but not visible in the photo priznakov- distinctive kind of undecided (up kind only).
And about Euploea - Basil - you're wrong)))

18.08.2015 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anarta stigmosa / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

18.08.2015 8:13, Basil Sergienko:

Anarta stigmosa

18.08.2015 1:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Thetidia smaragdaria. Same as in http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42262

18.08.2015 1:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Also inclined to this option.

18.08.2015 1:00, Shamil Murtazin:

NextHadenanot left (

18.08.2015 0:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Thetidia smaragdaria?

18.08.2015 0:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Celypha rosaceana?

18.08.2015 0:48, Shamil Murtazin:

Scopula marginepunctata?

18.08.2015 0:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Oh, in the "edit" now everything is smooth, no leaving. Thanks =)

18.08.2015 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Exactly. There was a conflict with groups. To undergo treatment.

18.08.2015 0:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Question of photos (not to be written in parallel in the subject of binding to the genera and taxa).
For example, here's a photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42243. In the right window you can see only one more photo from the group. Although the transition toPhaselia kasyiphoto is still there.

17.08.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ideopsis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ideopsis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A daw "inaccurate" nowhere clean is not necessary. It is certainly needed.
About renaming: it is possible and "approximate determination." As such an option?
"It seems it is, but something confusing and does not allow to say that the kind of precisely defined"
Or just call daw "definitely needs to be confirmed"
In general I think is optimal?

17.08.2015 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callopistria argyrosticta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.08.2015 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I'm a little redaktanul your comments if you disagree - call to your phone. And if you agree - note.

17.08.2015 22:20, Peter Khramov:

Dim, about inaccurate definition I wrote here http://lepidoptera.ru/community/41122. Look / otkommentiruyut tama then identity.

17.08.2015 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Identified in the final stage of the one who brought to the form (subspecies does not count is optional) :)

Here for example: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/14516
It has long been common knowledge that this Euploea sp. simply was not possible in the race to deliver.
And to kind of pipe with them .....
At most there are: undefined, large and beautiful.But do not even think to put as defined herein as they are not likely, if ((
And others as well: just an opportunity to kind of put. That puts the people that do not hanging in uncertain.

17.08.2015 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree, determine the form of mandatory subspecies is desirable, but not necessary, if possible. :)

17.08.2015 21:59, Peter Khramov:

If the determination to species - the author is to determine the type (and not to the kind, etc.) If, before the subspecies - I do not know. Good question. On the one hand, it is logical to put that to one subspecies and identified.On the other hand, sub-species - this thing is so optional that the value is to determine the subspecies is usually not so high as to species, so that the contribution of someone determined to species, more.
Maybe both?))

17.08.2015 21:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not tormented not identify to the species level, if you can put some kind, bіvayut cases where you can not really determine genital types, and sometimes when you have to dig deep, and it takes a lot of time. Easier to family or to family.
And the question of the definition of priority.One identified to the family, the other to the family, to the third type, the fourth tried to indicate a subspecies. Who determined.?

17.08.2015 21:36, Peter Khramov:

Tom, Thank you for sharing Fautua apart. With regard to the date - and the truth is, if possible, publish, please.

17.08.2015 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Artem is necessary to specify the date for the collection of butterflies.

17.08.2015 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.08.2015 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.08.2015 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.08.2015 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.08.2015 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.08.2015 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.08.2015 20:44, Peter Khramov:

By status:
Now there are the following gradation:

Tucson undefined - there are no bindings to any taxon. Even, for example, family. Where will these pictures:
1. Old photos from Lepidoptera, which remained from the time when it was possible to tie the photo only to the species, but not to other taxa.
2.New photos, that ship people not understanding at all in any taxa or do not understand how that load / when you download. Tucson determined to species or subspecies to - well, if there are further confirmation of fidelity definition, but in general, believe that everything is OK
Tucson determined to subgenus or higher - it requires a definition to the species or subspecies to (if possible).

Apart from all this is the jackdaw "imprecise definition."It is not relevant for the variant "taxon is not defined," but it is appropriate in the case to determine the type / subtype, and in the case of determining to superspecies taxon. And she says that, most likely it is that's it, but it is not 100% sure. IeThis property carries payload data: the user sees is not just Papilio sp, but "most likely view a certain" and although it recognizes that it is only "likely", not "just".So I think that to remove this checkbox will not have to, but it can be confusing (inaccurate determination we have, it turns out, is not a definition to superspecies taxon, as many believe, a definition to any taxon, but not 100% sure), and Furthermore, it may cause some damage "seriousness" of the site,bo "imprecise definition of" in entomology, is usually not used.

Perhaps the solution lies in the plane of terminology - to call the whole thing as something else, so that there was less confusion and the seriousness is not going away, but the information load remained.By glitches with fotami:
Shamil, throw off a reference to a problem page, I see.

17.08.2015 20:11, Shamil Murtazin:

By the way, if you now have the genera and subgenera in determining whether or not to review the status of "indefinite" photos? ..
Ie Now indefinitely Photo - this photo does not attribute any kind or genus or subgenus-stamped, or tribe.
Either make a separate check box for searches. Otherwise pictures may be lost.Regarding the glitches with no other kind of ph - everything remains the same. I can think about another glitch?

17.08.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What did these points are not in the MO? From here and and.

17.08.2015 18:43, Peter Khramov:

Well, the area something to do with it?) Then at the points that are interesting to you, because you've been there or at the level of the natural boundaries of the spread (and their modifications).

17.08.2015 18:40, Peter Khramov:

Basil, on the other photons of the same species - was a glitch that is associated with the presence / absence of the species subspecies. Who is corrected, it should be the norm.

17.08.2015 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, how's this for?
I live here))))
I spend my own observation.
And the point I prefer to find our own (do not ride on someone else's).
And I love the passion for wandering through the woods (the present, not the park) and think :)

17.08.2015 18:32, Peter Khramov:

Ok, now realized. Fixed.

17.08.2015 17:56, Peter Khramov:

I'm surprised that you even interested in the Red Book of the field. Why do you need it?

17.08.2015 17:44, Peter Khramov:

I mean, I do not suffer?

17.08.2015 17:28, Shamil Murtazin:

I'm afraid there no way underside (

17.08.2015 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loepa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loepa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loepa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Automeris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Automeris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Daphnis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Daphnis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 15:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the studio - so the studio.
That screen. Pay attention to the box instead of the name of the taxon in the hearth The name of the taxon
I is going on in all forms. And photo downloadable from the ugliness of the stands in limbo.

17.08.2015 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Balsa leodura / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.08.2015 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, it's all good. Just look at the people not suffering, opedelyaet kind to all. I'm not interested in the tropics, even hang with generic names.

17.08.2015 14:16, Peter Khramov:

Basil, on the boot of his kind - a concrete example of the studio. I have everything loaded.
Regarding you would be better and about a glitch in the glitch - offer on the public to be more correct slegontsa. Unfamiliar people can perceive literally.

17.08.2015 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Maripozas!
ZY For blozhika not useful on a trip to the zoo entot?

17.08.2015 13:31, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea sp.

17.08.2015 13:30, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris sp.

17.08.2015 13:30, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris sp.

17.08.2015 13:29, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa sp.

17.08.2015 13:27, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa sp.

17.08.2015 13:26, Alex Dumchus:

Neptis sp.

17.08.2015 13:26, Alex Dumchus:

Ideopsis sp.

17.08.2015 13:25, Alex Dumchus:

Remove

17.08.2015 13:24, Alex Dumchus:

Neptis sp

17.08.2015 13:23, Alex Dumchus:

Daphnis sp

17.08.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loepa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loepa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Samia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Samia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.08.2015 8:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa excelsa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.08.2015 8:23, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea sp.

17.08.2015 8:22, Alex Dumchus:

Pareronia sp

17.08.2015 8:21, Alex Dumchus:

Samia sp.

17.08.2015 8:20, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa

17.08.2015 8:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree that it is really a rare species. Read in the QC status: "3rd category. Rare species" ........
Local. Wow. But to rare .....
You have to see it with my own eyes how much there to stop believing allegations rarity. There's a clean, virgin forest where a lot of mushrooms and berries: blueberries, blueberries, cranberries, raspberries, blackberries, etc.And throughout the array of any "sanitary" cutting in view of a specific object, which is located there. And an array of rather big: it is huge indeed .... And everywhere flies Egeria .....

17.08.2015 2:17, Peter Khramov:

Clean meaningless. If anyone has something to report from personal observation in addition to infe site - for this is the appropriate section labeled Message.

17.08.2015 2:13, Peter Khramov:

Many times discussed. Russian names can be arbitrary. If in a nearby village called paradise A. paphia kozlodoem let is called. That's what she and Latin, to a Russian names can be treated ... No.

17.08.2015 1:44, Peter Khramov:

When there are materials whose contents need to be divided into major and minor parts - do that, no problem.

17.08.2015 1:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Footcloths, I think, all inconvenient to read.

17.08.2015 0:49, Leon Ortlieb:

"Scientists do not obstinacy, and the search for the truth :)"
And you humorist but ..

17.08.2015 0:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) Scientists do not obstinacy, and the search for truth :)

17.08.2015 0:33, Leon Ortlieb:

I agree that the name does not come from biologists.

Although sometimes in a particular area by biologists NAME You just do not understand who or what it is. We in Asia are (biologists and biology) called Siberian ibex tekami and not otherwise. Ask an ordinary hunter of Capricorn, and the majority of whom do not understand it.So with scaly Osman whom the people called trout. I have never heard so char from mountain rivers someone called loach. Pescara all.
I understand the official name (and Latin) is intended to bring order to the system, but it is not clear the mess with Latin NAME, which sometimes exceeds the Number of names given to the people.Hard-nosed individual scientists can not closer to unity.

17.08.2015 0:21, Peter Khramov:

What is agreed, then?

17.08.2015 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, I mean, I do not understand why it is necessary in our blogs? For forums - yes, maybe polzitelno that page does not stretch (and even then not every resource), but there is something?

17.08.2015 0:10, Shamil Murtazin:

About forumnye spoilers: http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=179679

17.08.2015 0:08, Peter Khramov:

Well yes. This framework is not a new ustakanilos where butterflies along with other insect would. Ie before the launch of the insects.

16.08.2015 23:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

New view for 8 region. not bad. :)

16.08.2015 23:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phyllonorycter corylifoliella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

16.08.2015 23:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leon, in Russian, this large butterfly (forest) perlamutrovka. Other names in Russian, for it is not. Everything else curve translation biologists.

16.08.2015 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, do not work curatorial windows, or rather non-existent.

16.08.2015 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

16.08.2015 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clepsis neglectana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 22:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Of course the second option. = Verify)

16.08.2015 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil doubt in my definition? or the ability to reset the name of a species? We check how the updated program. :)

16.08.2015 22:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, however the second time did not have to endure. An hour passed with no load :(

16.08.2015 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 22:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Endropiodes indictinaria / Confidently identified / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

16.08.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

According to claim 2 I realized - this by itself will.
According to claim 1 did not understand. Vapsche. Write more about what and how. And where does the FAQ.

16.08.2015 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Shamil Murtazin Cucullia artemisiae / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Shamil Murtazin Cucullia artemisiae / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia / Shamil Murtazin Cucullia artemisiae / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determination confirmed Evgeniy Belyaev, a leading expert on moths and LW Igor Kostyuk, one of the leading experts on moths Europe. Plus proof Tatiana Gordeeva, scientists at jacobsoni. I rather. :)))

16.08.2015 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

16.08.2015 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The female with the same terms as the male placed on this link: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42064
I chose again to the point in order to collect a series of species.
The goal successfully achieved and collected series:

Unfortunately generation is already on the decline of butterflies and consequently the state is poor (
The most interesting thing is that the males sit by one at a certain height above the ground and rather zealously guard their territory from attacks by attacking everyone indiscriminately insects: bees, flies, beetles (still one)not only butterflies :)
Females are at the same time kept close to the ground and rather inactive.
It is also interesting still is that butterflies are found directly in the forest, but not in the meadows, forest edges, meadows and other open areas.It is kind of interesting :)
I repeat: there is kind of very numerous and very strange why the Noginsk district is not mentioned until now in the Red Book of Defense: http://kkmo2.verhovye.ru/rb/bspozvon/pararge_aegeria.php
But this book, I did not trust every day more (((
But before agreeing on this species in particular .....

16.08.2015 21:32, Shamil Murtazin:

I think that thisCucullia absinthii

16.08.2015 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 20:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.08.2015 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia / Confidently identified / Eugene Davkaev.

16.08.2015 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, in the next topic: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/41122 (at the end) lies the answer: Trouble is that Peter will fix :)

16.08.2015 19:50, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil Alexander, now convincing.

16.08.2015 19:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, and this is now a division into gallery already gone? .. Just choose a photo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/16311, and there is "the other pictures of this kind yet."

16.08.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loepa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loepa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Samia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Samia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/community/41122

16.08.2015 18:43, Alex Dumchus:

Samia sp.

16.08.2015 18:43, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa sp.

16.08.2015 18:42, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea sp.

16.08.2015 18:39, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea sp.

16.08.2015 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea sp.

16.08.2015 18:35, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. What has been the definition of supraspecific pass?

16.08.2015 18:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chetone phyleis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 17:53, Alex Dumchus:

I bought it in a mix of insect-sale. com. It is there and, separately, at least photos, site trust, so we can assume a certain, Basil, endure.

16.08.2015 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Psilogramma / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lexias / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.08.2015 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptidea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adscita / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

16.08.2015 16:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Sokolov.

16.08.2015 15:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Wishlist I write (they are not all purely for blogs):
1. "spoiler" - to expand and collapse the list (by clicking). It is convenient to write the FAQ.
2. The ability to refer to a photo from the gallery site, for example by id photo. Ie have somehow tag id pictures - it appears in the text, when you click on the picture - go to page of the photo.It is necessary to twice not to ship to the blog and in the gallery the same photo.

16.08.2015 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon Alexander is right: it is Raznousaya butterfly ("moth" obihodno).
A Eueides tales belong to the Rhopalocera (the actual butterfly obihodno).
Compare antennae: they shaped antennae and different.

16.08.2015 14:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think it is not necessary hybrids Heliconius sp. carry
Peter, for such man-made hybrids can make a separate partition? They are available on the site :)

16.08.2015 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rosema / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 14:01, Leon Ortlieb:

Asked to search Chetone phyleis, clicked pictures, nothing like that has popped up. In another case, otherwise.

It would be useful to see the site and the page where you take the Old, and why are you in such a particular conclusion was ....

16.08.2015 12:43, Alex Dumchus:

It raznousaya, Leon! Chetone phyleis !!!

16.08.2015 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thecla betulae / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.08.2015 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Dim, make the selection in the gallery. Regarding inaccurate otpishu later.

16.08.2015 1:34, Peter Khramov:

In the gallery you can now select foty identified to subspecies to species, genus or subgenus up and up and up subtribe.
Alexander, there'll not load the update at a time. Now all dynamically loaded.
Basil realized will rule.

16.08.2015 1:15, Yuri Semejkin:

I agree with the option of Basil.

15.08.2015 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Autographa gamma?

15.08.2015 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and to comment for this photo Notice: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42119
There I tried to describe one more nasty thing, too, need to correct.
In short: not showing the rest of the species in the photo page with photos of any one of a butterfly.

15.08.2015 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.08.2015 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, what do you fix it? Everything is as it was: "The definition of species."

15.08.2015 20:44, Peter Khramov:

About the "definition" - corrected.

15.08.2015 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Thank corrected.

15.08.2015 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Sokolov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.08.2015 14:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I'm just surprised you with our carelessness. It was thought that komenty changed. The very first time I saw and sfotal views. useful to look, and there's not order :))) is now correct. :)

15.08.2015 6:10, Alexander Belousov:

Peter, once again updated the gallery buggy, is the date of 01.01.1970

15.08.2015 5:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Fedor Ovechkin Badamia exclamationis / Eugene Karolinskiy.

15.08.2015 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hesperiidae / Fedor Ovechkin Pelopidas / Eugene Karolinskiy.

14.08.2015 23:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Pelopidas sp.

14.08.2015 23:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Badamia exclamationis

14.08.2015 23:33, Leon Ortlieb:

Gore, of course it loudly. Just a couple of hundred meters. For local farmers that fancies a mountain, and for the guys from the Tian Shan, a mountain that is the navel ..

14.08.2015 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter decided you this example to show the essence of Gluck)
The right side here without thumbnails and write other pictures of this kind yet.
But clicking on the link Description Anarta trifolii and looking at the right side to understand what is actually kind of photos online dofiga and more.
And it seems not a single glitch, and mass.I do not know what it is connected, but it is necessary to correct and faster, the better.

14.08.2015 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is no doubt, and can not be.
Alexander in this line should be entered completely different.
Konretno: "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age"
All inappropriate subject line out mercilessly scrubbed moderators.Doubts here in the comments to the photo and nowhere else)))

14.08.2015 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 17:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.08.2015 16:27, Peter Khramov:

Not at all clear name - it is impossible. "View" correct. For other types of fotam - look. It should all be displayed.

14.08.2015 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And further.
Clicking on a photo displays one photo without other photos butterfly species in the right block.
To see more images have to go directly to the form.
So it should be?
Example: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42186
In this case, I think it would be logical to remove all reference to Submit your picture Hyles zygophylli from the right block on the page, photos instance.Leave you only similar link on the page where you can see all kinds of photos.

14.08.2015 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Synegia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.08.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Synegia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.08.2015 15:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Auzeinae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.08.2015 15:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Auzeinae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.08.2015 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cnephasia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cnephasia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bringing up gender or any other kind except taxon is not a full definition.
This is information that can help determine the final (to type).
For these cases, you can remove the name altogether define.

14.08.2015 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander and all.
Here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41567 in the author's comments suggested there was already after I otkommentil his assumption.
Diachrysia chryson? was not originally, and it was only Some "maned" butterfly. On the upper wing 2 greenish smear.
Later this fact, I myself have noticed, but the touch is defined not become.In principle, it is determined who is on the drum. I have written to me a bad thought.

14.08.2015 14:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2015 14:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I mean that the species can be determined either properly or at all uncertain. No imprecise definition for good website should not be !!! I offer all netochnoopredelennye move to undefined !!!

14.08.2015 14:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sliznevidki still cosmic beasts)))

14.08.2015 14:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, Alexander, I was about it !!! The inaccurate too, do not !!! It is necessary to make certain kind to certain families. A imprecisely defined generally offer clean!

14.08.2015 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, you need to adjust the inscription under the photos. "The definition of species" on a "Determination", and that will not dock.

14.08.2015 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitri that only certain kinds of generic to or higher taxon, leaving the uncertain part. And then they will not find among certain. And immediately the question sentence. All definitions are not the type to put in the ill-defined. And in the light of the new site, determined the Lepidoptera and accurate. :)

14.08.2015 13:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Evgeny Sokolov.

14.08.2015 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks for the signal corrected.

14.08.2015 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Why will hang something? They are just now easily selected, write the taxon is not defined, and here's a list of photons can iterate and transfer to the genera, families and other tribes. Or are you on about?

14.08.2015 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, thank you. I hold it in my hands and leafing through recently. Good book.
But, unfortunately one that I came out. It will be fully conceived by then.

14.08.2015 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not displayed on the left do when no photons expose of a single photographer.

14.08.2015 11:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil ! There infa for you. Come to Andrei Lobanov in the news section of 08/14/15 there was invited to book ML Danilevsky. 2014 Beetles-horned beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycoidea) of Russia and neighboring countries. Part 1
Kind of like your favorite family you may want to purchase. Below is a link to order the author.

14.08.2015 11:05, Peter Khramov:

Why can not tolerate?

14.08.2015 10:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And then they will hang, and in particular the type, without family, without a tribe.

14.08.2015 10:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Semomesia croesus

14.08.2015 9:50, Peter Khramov:

Yes, this thing is already in the list dodelok future. But first, you can safely select a vague and figachit their row (most of them are already up, then every family can be determined, and when nemozhno, it's still there, and the superfamily).

14.08.2015 9:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Fedor, you can transfer photos to the taxa above species level, but only for a limited time after uploading photos to the site (the same as it was before with the views).

14.08.2015 9:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

14.08.2015 9:10, Fedor Ovechkin:

In connection with the innovations, can I tie it on their own photo to the genusPieris? If not, please do so moderators.

14.08.2015 8:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

14.08.2015 8:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides oblongomaculatus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.08.2015 8:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In light of this event (the transfer to taxa) suggests gradation image (a kind of uncertainty, determined to sort, determined to family, etc.)) in a search engine gallery

14.08.2015 8:27, Peter Khramov:

The parameter list for an example of the tabernacle, in which begins to fail.

14.08.2015 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you need innovation: long overdue. Scattered now tries his visyaki - works.
But I notice the glitch did not work in the gallery if the sample set several parameters. Climb itself, and look better.

14.08.2015 7:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Callidrepana argenteola / Dmitriy Pozhogin Callidrepana / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Callidrepana argenteola / Dmitriy Pozhogin Callidrepana / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eupterote / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eupterote / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drepanidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drepanidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleora / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleora / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupterote / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupterote / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupterote / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupterote / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cricula / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cricula / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monodecus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monodecus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Risoba / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Risoba / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometridae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drepanidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drepanidae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xenoplia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xenoplia / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paramaxates / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 6:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paramaxates / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 6:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 6:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.08.2015 1:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Understood!

14.08.2015 1:48, Peter Khramov:

Yuri now foty illustrate new species are not automatic, but only on the team responsible for this people.

14.08.2015 1:42, Peter Khramov:

Everything is ready, you can work as usual. Achtung! Now you can transfer foty to all taxa.Do any of modders have the time - please run and poperenosit relevant fotam (even to the level of family and superfamily), and who do not have the appropriate rights - poostavlyat comments under fotami with supraspecific taxa to Modera easier to work with.

14.08.2015 1:40, Peter Khramov:

In order not to waste time, while I understand the update framework for insects, spread new technical functionality further Lepidoptera:
1. The two galleries instead of one (see. The next topic)
2. Snap pictures to any taxon, not only to the mind. Now, when uploading photos, and when you edit in the LC and the moderators shots tally to a taxon at any level. This flag is "determined inaccurately" refers specifically to affix taxon. For example, Papilio sp., Determined inaccurately means that you think that's kind of the genus Papilio, but are not sure they are right.Attention!Now when prostanovka taxon is better to wait avtopodstanovok with the number of taxa than just unsubscribe taxon and press Enter-(in the latter case it is also work, but there may be glitches, for example, in the case of like kind and subgenus - one only name the program will not be able determine where to push through Fautua,propihnet and its one of the options is not necessarily true).
3. Slightly redesigned interface - the new version is less extra clearances and more no harm.In addition, the control unit in the gallery moved to the right column (similar to a directory), and, given the large number of users who do not see the editing of samples in the catalog or the gallery, added more lines in the subtitle to the tip on this subject.
Questions, comments - Wellcome.

14.08.2015 1:32, Peter Khramov:

Interfaces at two galleries unloaded. Now moved from gallery to gallery can only modernizing how things break in, there will be such a function and load on truck users (for self).
In the near future otrihtuyu several species under the case and discuss it.For now, just for how it looks, you can look at all an example of swallowtail - I was there for one photo in the beginning suffered an additional gallery.

14.08.2015 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Lord modernizing now foty will not tolerated and even sit on the priest exactly, is a new thing interfaces / bases site. It will take about 20 minutes, runs out - please.

14.08.2015 0:35, Yuri Semejkin:

And that in the description of the picture is not recorded. Doubt what?

13.08.2015 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter suffered in vain. The genus other types have a check is nowhere: the site had to die (

13.08.2015 21:56, Peter Khramov:

Precedents were. Legislation generally nachhat all but written contract with the author. Another thing is that the pop-scientific purposes is still allowed to quote the amount determined by the author of the quote. Including it is for graphics. This is for cases when a photo has been published by the author in the open source. But this is so, mistress note.We're still no more about the laws, and respect of human modders / administrator to the user and vice versa.
Alexander, do not be afraid, the enemy will not pass!

13.08.2015 21:51, Peter Khramov:

Oh, Demitri, Stas explained to you; -)))) A Th himself in the desert was never Stoll? Well patrimony!

13.08.2015 21:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perola villosipes / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.08.2015 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The criteria I have suggested in my post on the 12.08.2015 19:07
A total of two. And then in my opinion it is not necessary to inflate.

13.08.2015 21:34, Peter Khramov:

Downloading foty to the site, the user agrees to all of the above. And if you do not agree, you should explicitly state it (and then edit will not). It's about editing.
About distribution in the gallery - is generally authorship has nothing to do.In this regard, the dictatorship of the moderators, and the author and other users of a deliberative vote.
And that, in fact, not questions for discussion. To discuss - criteria gallery. Well, for them, apparently still in the living examples boom.

13.08.2015 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

can not cart, control the horse
It depends on which side pdoyti))) Everything is relative ....

13.08.2015 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then, so be it)) Just light it you have some)
That's what affinis in Moscow: http://insectamo.ru/component/content/article/98-hete/noctuidae/1414-cosmia-affinis
On both sides darker.
Therefore the question has arisen)

13.08.2015 20:32, Alexander Belousov:

Basil, I went on the links. Now even more confidence that it is - Cosmia affinis. The underside of the rear wing clarifies everything. I think so!

13.08.2015 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.08.2015 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.08.2015 20:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Perola villosipes???

13.08.2015 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah. From Limacodinae small mammal.
Some kind of Perola Walker, 1855
From the series: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/15880
Unfortunately, a good site at which they ceased to exist. Therefore, the definition of problem (

13.08.2015 20:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

You there's smoke))) What chew liver ???

13.08.2015 20:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female Appias olferna olferna Swinhoe, 1890

13.08.2015 20:03, Peter Khramov:

It was-it was! At the creek Pechenzhuy!

13.08.2015 20:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

is where it was from Guyana

13.08.2015 19:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can not cart, control the horse. No one takes copyright. All photos indicating the author. But put on the site in general and in what section to the administrator and to some extent the moderators.

13.08.2015 19:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And I think that this is something of a kind Bertula

13.08.2015 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Check. I put in inaccurate, although I think that this is it.

13.08.2015 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lythria cruentaria / Tentatively identified / Male / Shamil Murtazin.

13.08.2015 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

His did not measure more (later). Without a ruler and memory: about two cm. In scope. No one else at first glance does not look like except ognёvki or krambidy.
Although the devil knows it .... It all can be.
In winter, I find her and lay sfotayu :)

13.08.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleuksandr, you can rejoice: I am not blackmailing and photos here do not intend to take.
Not only: I will post further. It is good to whom and in abundance))
But take a photo (to stop cooperating with the site) of any author has the right when he pleases.Because all rights to the photos legally owned by the author, not the site even after loading the site (it is written in the rules and legislation).
Just precedents here has ever had. I am afraid that such a precedent will be created in connection with this development. God grant that this did not happen :)

13.08.2015 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

And what size?

13.08.2015 19:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

She is not. :)

13.08.2015 19:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

By phone will not say with confidence, becoming inaccurate. :)

13.08.2015 19:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, I see that you made a mistake with the family.

13.08.2015 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With regard to rights.
Quote you know where:
" All materials posted under articles and images posted in the gallery and / or used as illustrations for the descriptions and items owned by the poster and published online with Lepidoptera.ru their consent.In order to use them anywhere else, you must obtain the consent of the author (contact details of all our writers are available in the relevant section). "
From this it follows that the image as it was before zagruki property of the author, and so it remains after.And so it is necessary to seek the consent (permission) to edit the author as well as for transfer to secondary gallery.

13.08.2015 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeah, gee !!! Tears from the Carpathian Mountains, phone charge, and then cause! on your computer will be only on Monday, while there is a connection, chtonibut write :)
1. Basil, it may ktonibut, and you will decide what galleries have pictures. and that you including appeared tedious and thankless work Delage. You asked in this thread is not to hide behind generalities.Well, I will not seek out your photos and transfer them to an additional gallery. I hope that you will be the most stringent critic of yourself.
2. no something bad or shameful in more galleries. On the main up to 20 photos. on extra rest.
3.Basil, stop puzhat leaving the site and fence pictures, it's not funny, and like a pure blackmail. Enough nonsense suffer. It is better to work harmoniously and more doubt.
4. Peter, I can not understand the mechanism of the fence photo. If people put up photos, avtomatticheski agreed to a demonstration, you have authorship. all.I later determined Vasily linked to the group, Irina has issued a page type and after that I'm clear picture. Too late, it was necessary not to expose. :)

13.08.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, all the same on the links like when possible.
A Cosmia affinis I now put. True male and from the suburbs :)

13.08.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diarsia rubi / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.08.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

13.08.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diarsia rubi / Vasiliy Feoktistov Xestia baja / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.08.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander)). Oddly enough, but her I did not think)

13.08.2015 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

13.08.2015 18:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, a really difficult race. :) But I'm on the phone here seeXestia baja

13.08.2015 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, for sure it?
Any strange it is for C. affinis.
For me more onCosmia diffinisit looks like: http://insectamo.ru/component/content/article/98-hete/noctuidae/1415-cosmia-diffinis

13.08.2015 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Difficult for me to race.
Although virtually no doubt put in inaccurate.
I ask a knowledgeable person to look at it just in case.

13.08.2015 17:33, Peter Khramov:

What used to be called a blog now goes as news from the world nasekomyshey, including nauchpop. The blogs also have the opportunity to write any users. If there is a sufficient number of records - will divide this section by topic, author and Lead column.On several occasions expressed the wishes of potential authors on the subject, while others have started to post this business is online is blogging section.
The issue:
What functionality do you need to record, which is currently not the forum? About downloading pictures on the website - remember, it will be necessary. Something else?

13.08.2015 17:30, Peter Khramov:

There are many photons, which have some glitches on all systems.
Copyright with TZ Legislation is not going away.
Yes, there are authors who are important to their vision, but they foty and usually such that no one would think of their rule. We are talking about very different cases.
And let's not talk about it, how about some news.News - this division into two galleries. A phot editing was from the beginning, just now, for lack of time, slightly abated.
And if suddenly there is any doubt about the right - I remind you that there is no photo site, and therefore, for example, even the author himself may not remove Fautua (but has every right to do so through the mediation of the administrator).On the case: Take a certain number of species with a large number of photons himself poraspredelyayu the galleries, and then discuss the results. Perhaps it would be easier still.

13.08.2015 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As it does not influence?
If you edited on a computer other than my something on my look will be different than on the computer on which edited.
Settings on the hardware level is at the monitor and video card driver. And in most windsurfing are also present.There's a bunch of sliders, and on different computers, they can be removed in different ways, depending on the visual perception of a particular user. If it were, each user can self-calibrate the graphics subsystem and the question then, would no longer relevant, that is.In fact, when confronted in practice with someone else, the most contemporary of accessories computer and you see what he did shove and not configured. And accordingly runs at times worse and brakes companies 10 years ago, where all the components of the chosen with love and adjusted to each other for compliance ...Here then are surprised :)
But the main course is the copyright on the photo.
How will they soblyudatsya if this image will change the person or with a side does not have to do with this picture? This in my opinion is still that to change the text at its discretion in any book if the text to you for some reason do not like :)

13.08.2015 16:38, Peter Khramov:

And it does not affect the fact foty edit or not.

13.08.2015 15:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Update as of mats. Yuri, ideally need to catch this species and to investigate. In the instance depicted Kononenko strigula of Primorye, but on the map of areas for Primorye points for strigula not drawn only shaded area west of the Urals, which is suggestive. It is quite possible that this is closely related species, which differ only in the genitals.Other nolid its tables differ in appearance from your instance is quite convincing, although live scoops often seem a bit different than in collections.

13.08.2015 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, we forget one important fact.
Two identical computers does not exist in nature, as well as two identical men :)
In this case I am referring to the video subsystem computer: graphics adapter (graphics card) and monitor. This case is different from all the computers on the hardware level and a different set eyes.And so on different computers and photos can easily be looked at differently.

13.08.2015 15:05, Yuri Semejkin:

With regard to color shifts. Only the author of the image, and then only with a fresh mind can say what shade a butterfly.
Place this file on purpose, in order to compare with http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42175 .. On both images no color shift, those. shades are what were at the time of the shooting.

13.08.2015 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it was necessary to first consider thoroughly: weigh sufficiently serious risks that may arise in connection with this matter .....
A practical advantages almost zero except plus quite dubious: hiding the photo that someone known to him for one reason, did not like (
That's my opinion and change.

13.08.2015 14:46, Peter Khramov:

Ahrenet!
Basil, we're all with Alexander and together with you on Skype discussed, and you were with both hands. Now "it is much needed."
Well nihchego currently.

13.08.2015 14:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Do not forget the new Gallery to note that this kind exist in Primorye. In general, according to Matov AY ZIN - the Russian Far East 12 species Meganola

13.08.2015 14:45, Peter Khramov:

We have almost half of ph edited if that Basil ... So narmul, try without conflict. With regards to the editing - often very visible, where a shift in color and non-radical left editing very topic. But the rotation is usually - too much.Yuri, for a photo of one individual issue altogether irrelevant - page photo necessarily go the other photos from the same individual, even if they are registered in the second gallery.

13.08.2015 14:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Meganola strigula determined by analogy with the http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/42175

13.08.2015 13:50, Shamil Murtazin:

AnotherArchips... I still make a mistake)

13.08.2015 13:48, Shamil Murtazin:

Who would confirm or deny)

13.08.2015 13:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Closer thanCelypha siderananot found, but this is not it :(

13.08.2015 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Conflicts are inevitable on the way to the care of the authors, along with their photos from the site ((
This is a worse prognosis, but I think no one wants to ensure that his work is someone out there, and for some reasons known to him alone, and not like it was in the gallery ... more
Obviously risky venture, the two galleries.And it is so much need?
I outline briefly the subject directly in your approach.

13.08.2015 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

12.08.2015 21:53, Petr Khramov
It seems that the basic question comes down to who will be engaged in the beginning, and by the example of one's work can already be discussed further: -)

I personally do not want to use a transfer of a secondary or main gallery: I think that here I have no right to judge.And for editing other people's photos is not worth taken except cropping and rotation. How can an outsider to know what looked like a concrete specimens. in fact, in order to decide whether or not to edit?
Actually the whole thing clearly conflicted as the 99.9% may be misunderstanding and nafig it is not necessary (

13.08.2015 11:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pachliopta aristolochiae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.08.2015 11:06, Alex Dumchus:

Basil, and this is recorded in the certain

13.08.2015 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

13.08.2015 7:46, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio memnon, female

13.08.2015 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not necessarily blueberries. She did polyphage.
It is simply a list of kormovuhi was cut very much. Expand it)))

13.08.2015 7:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pangrapta vasava / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

13.08.2015 2:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Pangrapta vasava Identified Matov AY ZIN

13.08.2015 2:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Partially I agree with Basil, in particular on the photo section of the entomological collection (purely collectible).
As for the images in nature, but now apparently it is not uncommon when pictures are taken in nature and collectible items are straightened one individual.In this case, they need to stand together, it will make some comparisons in the determination. Especially it concerns slozhnoopredelyaemyh and genital differences, which are sometimes partly still definable

13.08.2015 0:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Blueberries should be there to look chtol =)

12.08.2015 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Leon, on the future - because Comment refers to the mind, not the pictures, it is best to post it on the page type http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8539. There you can wait for an answer and quickly ...

12.08.2015 21:55, Leon Ortlieb:

Wikipedia is that after the investigations conducted by Bellmann, despite NAME in Latin Butterfly nothing to do with birch has no .. caterpillars feed on various plum (blackthorn, plum).
In addition, Tolman and Lewington claim that doll "coddling" or her care ants Lasius niger (Black Garden Ant).
Who knows about more?

12.08.2015 21:53, Peter Khramov:

It seems that the basic question comes down to who will be engaged in the beginning, and by the example of one's work can already be discussed further: -)

12.08.2015 21:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nola aerugula / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

12.08.2015 20:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Yeah ... I should not have thought better to post your mega-list =)
I have been there gusyanki, eggs and pupae with exuvia =) It is necessary to post it? ..
I just thought that the list itself - is self-evident. But the question is in the selection criteria, such as a photo for the underside straightened instance, when they are, say, five.Whether the quality of the material and raspravki assess whether the quality of the photo ...
Well, quite difficult when there is, for example, a lot of photos ispod in nature. In principle, such a question the moderator decides that illustrates a page of the form (pardon the tautology).
The criterion of completeness of the information in the caption to the photo - interesting.Probably, it is not worth discounted.

And, inspired by communion with Peter, is to provide more such positions as "massive accumulation of species." For example, a massive watering whiteflies, flights monarchs, columns marching pine moth, etc.

12.08.2015 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What if the person is deliberately loaded a picture and suddenly someone has decided to correct this image to your (foreign) taste?
Regarding the angle of collection:
I mean for each specimen. (males, females, form, subspecies) needs its top and underside are self-:) Well, perhaps even necessary for each collector's copy.wingspan somewhere said (this is important in many cases).

12.08.2015 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Why did nothing. Transfer from gallery to gallery, and touch-up of poisonous substances in cases (of which more than half) have quite a done without regard to the author. Well, or postoglyadkoy (ie, the author raises the question, saying that such an accomplished afterward).
With regards to a top and underside. But the form is still there. And males and females.And there is one photo of one angle that thread needs one, and the other another.

12.08.2015 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I should add, because it is really important.
With the author's photo Nothing should be done without the consent of the author himself (except transfer in case the kind defined / redefined).

12.08.2015 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There should be two criteria by which photos will be shared:
1. Photo Gallery in nature. All angles in addition to showing the parts of the body like the head (especially for indefinite butterfly) ..
Gallery 2. Photo from the entomological collection. 2 angle: top and underside optional
And that's all.All other parameters such as for a point, not to the point, just to some one quality is not looked, etc. No need and totally unnecessary.
And more: a photo with a crooked or even blank fields "The date and time of shooting / fishing." and Location shooting / fishing. machine must be deposited into the background without regard to quality and to who it depicted.For me personally lately the first value is not the quality of the picture, and then, underneath it is written in these fields, the most :)

12.08.2015 19:04, Peter Khramov:

The people need opinions here in this thread http://lepidoptera.ru/community/41031, then that conflict was not very much.

12.08.2015 18:57, Basil Sergienko:

aerugula

12.08.2015 18:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Yeah, I figured. Forgotten, that is old-school forum. Here you can not just copy the link, you must first click on it =)

12.08.2015 18:20, Peter Khramov:

I'm on your link is okay, but you need to wait until all the images are loaded on this horse page.

12.08.2015 15:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Allocated clear))) thee when Nino wait?

12.08.2015 15:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sometimes fly)))

12.08.2015 14:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter and I tried, produces only a link page in which your post. That's why I write what is not working.
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&view=findpost&p=1570419

12.08.2015 14:26, Alex Dumchus:

Pachliopta aristolochiae

12.08.2015 14:01, Peter Khramov:

Yes, like running. Jamal on the link with the number of fasting, and gives you a URL to copy. 23223 And there can be a long look, he's not the last, as I understand it ...

12.08.2015 13:58, Peter Khramov:

For insects have made binding mechanism photos or additional to the main gallery. Foty from the main gallery are displayed on the page of the form and on the page picture of this kind of right, but of more - just not shown, and are only displayed on the additional push of a button.In addition, razedele Gallery, you can choose whether to show all foty or only from one of the galleries. The division of the following: basic angles, stage of development, etc. go to the main gallery. Foty for points and others that do not need to be removed, but which are secondary - in extra.In the first step of moving foty galareyam will only moderators and default foty will fall into the main gallery.
I suggest in this thread to discuss the objective criteria (if any at all), by which photos will be moved there or here. Any idea - put online. Questions - ask.

12.08.2015 13:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurois occulta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

12.08.2015 13:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurois occulta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

12.08.2015 13:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Oops, I think the window is left open editing (
Correct yourself.

12.08.2015 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Dmitri, about the rooms - everything just write in the system area.

12.08.2015 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Dim, about numbers determine it you can look, pointing to the user in the list of comments.

12.08.2015 12:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago / Male / Alex Dumchus.

12.08.2015 12:58, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by comments from the page pictures of the same individual.

12.08.2015 12:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Basil Sergienko.

12.08.2015 12:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurois occulta / Confidently identified / .

12.08.2015 12:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurois occulta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

12.08.2015 12:29, Basil Sergienko:

Eurois occulta

12.08.2015 11:39, Shamil Murtazin:

http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&st=27200#
post # 23223
(does not work they go to normal recording)

12.08.2015 11:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Ie Information on photo no one female? .. And they have them fly at least? .. (I want to try to withdraw, but it is necessary because the female =)

12.08.2015 11:28, Shamil Murtazin:

OrNola aerugulaandMeganola albula... (Victor Yepishin)

12.08.2015 11:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male. which won a mustache

12.08.2015 10:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Similarly, in the same place a year =)
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32542
This male or impossible to say exactly?

11.08.2015 23:14, Leon Ortlieb:

The Germans gave the revelers NAME pigeon's tail. Perhaps there is something ..

11.08.2015 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.08.2015 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noctua fimbriata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.08.2015 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ornithoptera priamus / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.08.2015 17:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Nola confusalis ?

11.08.2015 15:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male ornithoptera priamus

11.08.2015 15:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Color did not differ?

11.08.2015 15:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima stellera / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.08.2015 14:25, Tatiana Selena:

I guess I was wrong all the same to me they seemed the same! I see now that these top troides really black!

11.08.2015 13:43, Alex Dumchus:

Long looked at the belly of my collection, did not understand :)))

11.08.2015 13:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

08.11.2015 7:57 Tatiana Celena
On the Internet and found out there is written description and exactly this.
and you can be referring to this negodgny site?

11.08.2015 13:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

belly)))

11.08.2015 12:22, Alex Dumchus:

I there and both, significant differences in the front wings, do not find. Here the rear of these types are slightly different

11.08.2015 12:16, Alex Dumchus:

Tatiana, look carefully at least the fact that all troides upper wings are black-brown, green and yellow was not present at all. Just in case, here's a site for sailboats, there is no truth underside http://swallowtails.net/

11.08.2015 10:29, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

11.08.2015 10:28, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

11.08.2015 9:29, Viktor Yepishin:

I see it Dioryctria abietella.

11.08.2015 8:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And why did you decide that this moth?

11.08.2015 8:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ypthima stellera galeria Fruhstorfer, 1911

11.08.2015 8:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For me the typical female Troides oblongomaculatus

11.08.2015 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male ornithoptera priamus

11.08.2015 7:57, Tatiana Selena:

On the Internet and found out there is written description and exactly this, and ornithoptera priamus also did not like, everything is green and brown a little yellow! Well I will not be determined not spec does not work!

11.08.2015 7:29, Alex Dumchus:

Why would etobyl troides? It ornithoptera priamus, male. Tatiana put even your definition in imprecisely defined

10.08.2015 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.08.2015 19:10, Alex Dumchus:

Pts. similar to diaethria clymena

10.08.2015 15:59, Leon Ortlieb:

Goodness! Simple and Research in quotes .. Okay.
I can perefotat German determinant table, no question. Something to translate if necessary. But of course, these tables can not be exhibited here, and it is necessary to make your own. And with improvements.
If you need to give the address of Internet - shop where the determinant of the day butterflies there.

10.08.2015 13:52, Peter Khramov:

Leon, well, there Well, even quotes are what really Bole: -)

10.08.2015 13:49, Leon Ortlieb:

Peter, "2. pop" unscientific. "" Let's replace the word for amateur determinant for fans.
I forgot to say that under these tables reference is made to page 60, where there is also a lively Belyanko photo, close up. (On page 59 is a description of the form. 2 form (their description) on one page.) And normally, the tables are guided, then you check the description of the indicated page ..
.

10.08.2015 11:21, Alexander Belousov:

Transfer the photos, it is -Melitaea sibina

10.08.2015 11:21, Alexander Belousov:

Transfer the photos, it is -Melitaea sibina

10.08.2015 7:45, Alex Dumchus:

Then I assume it t. cuneifera

10.08.2015 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lexias pardalis / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

10.08.2015 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

10.08.2015 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha pamphilus / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

10.08.2015 7:40, Alex Dumchus:

Lexias pardalis, male

10.08.2015 7:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio xuthus

10.08.2015 7:30, Alexander Belousov:

Coenonympha pamphilus

10.08.2015 6:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think in theXanthorhoe spadicearia.

10.08.2015 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Noctua fimbriata?

10.08.2015 2:25, Tatiana Selena:

Only one frame was, I do not know that at the bottom.

10.08.2015 1:56, Peter Khramov:

Dim if to type in any way, otpishi supraspecific taxa closest. Soon the boom to transfer not only to the species, but also other taxa.

09.08.2015 23:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Type designation! Alexander! Spend the job done

09.08.2015 22:50, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, in the upper box, write comments in Russian, and in the bottom (optional, if you can / wish) - in English. OK?

09.08.2015 22:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

...or C. hyale...

09.08.2015 22:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO P. thersites (or maybe icarus f. icarinus).

09.08.2015 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diasemia reticularis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.08.2015 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.08.2015 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.08.2015 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.08.2015 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Well so in the exact time?

09.08.2015 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Basil. After all, just sensed that it is necessary to put it in inaccurate)))
Prompted to do so last year's event: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31984 (that is true more in scope and much darker). The most important thing is mind-like and nowhere to take in my yard ......But despite the fact that in the area there is no oak (though birch in abundance) to collect her second season in a row (I can say that until last year was kind of not).
Looks birch she really fell like :)

09.08.2015 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ennomos erosaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov Ennomos quercinaria / Basil Sergienko.

09.08.2015 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ennomos erosaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov Ennomos quercinaria / Basil Sergienko.

09.08.2015 20:34, Basil Sergienko:

It quercinaria

09.08.2015 18:44, Peter Khramov:

1. Copyright is already now beginning to be put in a Lepidoptera.pro, and on Insecta.pro.
2. When the page is loaded with the type or photo will fly glitch with hyphens (earlier if the name of the species contained a hyphen (Polygonia c-album, etc.), the Fota could not attached to the form. Now all the rules.
3.Increased the size of the maximum size of the photos (those that pop up when you click on Fautua size of 320 pixels in the gallery). Previously, the restriction was 1024x768, 1280x768 is now. For today's large monitors will be a noticeable difference when viewing the same wide pictures.Remember, if you want to have your picture published in the best quality (if it does not require trimming), Georgia within its size 1280x768. If you load a large image, it will be automatically reduced to the site, the quality may be a little worse.

There will be questions - write.

09.08.2015 16:16, Yuri Semejkin:

1). Feed. As stated in the article http://sadvred.ru/poleznye-nasekomye/153-apanteles.html cottagers do not have to take up the sprayer. All the work for them, make them one APANTELES, while vegetables are environmentally friendly.
2). Knowing who they are. People stop to remove the same, these yellow cabbage pupa, stops them considered as pests.Someone maybe curiosity will move more specifically interested in insects. And if the site will be brief, clear all infa picture, but still useful, the popularity of the site is expected to increase. And this despite the fact that it is not necessary to then dig in search of information across an Internet and simply go here .......

09.08.2015 15:41, Peter Khramov:

And how it is proposed to preserve? ..

09.08.2015 15:41, Peter Khramov:

Repaired. Now it works and for downloading from the species or from the gallery.

09.08.2015 14:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Dolls and rider can be removed separately, or cut out of it. And yet, and you can make a separate topic, for example dachnikov- Beneficial insects to your site - take care of them.

09.08.2015 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Got it, now it is clear from the ears grow. Boom mending.

09.08.2015 13:24, Peter Khramov:

Well, we leave for the insects?

09.08.2015 12:42, Igor Ivannikov:

I replaced the photo on larger, photos 42111 and 42110 can be removed.

09.08.2015 12:12, Yuri Semejkin:

So the rider. Thank you, Nick!

09.08.2015 11:41, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Apanteles glomeratus.

09.08.2015 11:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Though there is a caterpillar, but decided to add more. The picture shows a caterpillar larvae?, Doll? (I do not know in this case is correct) of the parasite emerged from it.

09.08.2015 7:30, Alex Dumchus:

The female Troides, for ODA. type rear fenders needed

09.08.2015 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate and I want to ask to look. Yet it may beEnnomos quercinaria. Confused in their ((

09.08.2015 6:41, Fedor Ovechkin:

Vasily rights, I have the same thing happened before the hyphen is set manually.

09.08.2015 5:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Endropiodes indictinaria (Bremer, 1864) ?

08.08.2015 23:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter is loaded "out of form" to the row in the upload form where the name is the name of the form is displayed without a hyphen. It looks like this: polygonia c album It seems to me that because of this glitch.

08.08.2015 22:55, Peter Khramov:

Who checked all the rules. Nothing in the admin area to please because of hyphens should not. Long since corrected, it turns out. Apparently, the glitch was something else, not in the dash.

08.08.2015 17:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Shirozua jonasi / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

08.08.2015 7:39, Alex Dumchus:

Most likely the male euploea mulciber

08.08.2015 0:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Only I suggested not to reinvent the wheel, and at least collect his major pieces. Determinant benefit a lot. Yes, the same determinant Migranova. He is the same essence that insektamo, but no illustrations.
(I think that sooner or later everything will come to that, what I'm saying, but only by his unknown)

07.08.2015 22:56, Peter Khramov:

I understand that Shamil proposed to ask the author, and do not think ... However, the direct copying of here and the truth is not gud. At the time, I talked to the author about the integration of its site Lepidoptera, but as always, the friendship did not win. And this was perhaps the most appropriate version of the task.Maybe, in the framework of the insects return to this question, though not very likely any changes, more a matter of personal sites - more emotional than rational.

07.08.2015 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Thank you call each other, discuss!

07.08.2015 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, insects will try to correct the matter immediately.

07.08.2015 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I wrote that the species that are hyphenated (including this one) machine cater to the admin panel instead of immediately getting up to (((
To understand this we must troubles .....

07.08.2015 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio rumanzovia / Tatiana Selena Pachliopta aristolochiae / Alex Dumchus.

07.08.2015 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Moduza procris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

07.08.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Minois dryas / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.08.2015 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And it is necessary, I copy with insektamo? I think no.
Not only will it look bad. Moreover, the sole author and owner of the domain insectamo.ru (ex. Sungaya.narod.ru) have among the sponsors of the site. I know this is exactly how it will contact and has long been helping this man and his site c definition of beetles and the add photos from my collection)))
The site lepidoptera.ru should have its own, original oprdelitel and copy-paste the network to produce nothing :)

07.08.2015 20:49, Shamil Murtazin:

Come on, try.

07.08.2015 19:46, Shamil Murtazin:

There have already determinants. Making the similarity insektamo. Mikrocheshuyu, the Far East, border types, etc. add later.
Local search is already available, it is necessary to ask for permission and copy insektamo, and let the user chooses that it is more convenient. Plus, these methods can be cross :)

07.08.2015 18:27, Peter Khramov:

I think there are two approaches to creating determinants.

1. Classic, "scientific". Take a list of mes / antithesis (for dichotomous key) or characteristic values ​​(for polytomous) and, in fact, do. This, by itself, will help illustrate. But the main work here is still rather than in graphics, namely tezah / symptoms.The priority of this approach - accuracy.
And yes, without specific terminilogii do not succeed at all and nothing.

2. pop "unscientific." Take a clear list of all (or many) signs and do it on the basis of polytomous "determinant".In this illustration play a very prominent role and the work of "the definition of" being like this:
Entering a value of clear and well-known user characteristics (eg geography, color, a first approximation of the classification), are displayed on the picture / description of suitable species are compared visually and by text.In general, something like the present Catalogue, only the more filled.
The priority of this approach - ease of use.
No terminology do more or less possible.

The second option is necessary in any case, because it combines the functions of the catalog and the determinant. Without the catalog is still nowhere.The first is also good, but here it requires the participation of specialists.

07.08.2015 17:21, Leon Ortlieb:

Dmitri, in this case, yes. But it is also self and between species.
If you do a real determinant, to date, the only way, and applying for comparing similar close - (Kie) species.
This will be the determinant of demand and a bookshelf.
And it will be clear to all amateurs, without what it takes to teach anatomy and spets.zhargon butterflies ..Those couple of hundred butterflies Palearctic, it should be possible .. Or?
I was the first stone for the construction brought ..

Peter often these descriptions zamorocheny so that spice spices do not understand. Arrow yeah .. It would help to understand the more ..

07.08.2015 16:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Minois dryas (Scopoli, 1763)

07.08.2015 16:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Shirozua jonasi (Janson, 1877)

07.08.2015 15:30, Peter Khramov:

In the near future (and not only) future looms task that does not require deep expertise: preparation of data to download other people's photos. Let me explain: there are people who have foty interesting species of insects, and who agree to publish them online, but they do not want it / can not.I foty these are with the author's descriptions of them. In many cases the description already laid out on the shelves (the name of the taxon, geography, etc.), but they need to be verified (whether all laid out a gun) and complete / correct if necessary before loading the site (or edited immediately after loading).In addition, there can also be a function of at least a primary selection flies from cutlets (foty quite banal or not at all in the subject).
Usually, I do this. But not always enough time. For example, now we are waiting for a preparation of several thousand photons. And in August, according to preliminary data, it adds some more ... ... tens of thousands ...If anyone can help with this - reported. Again, special knowledge is not required, it is sufficient to be able to isolate the Latin name among the three lines of text in Russian or English (mostly) tongue.

07.08.2015 15:21, Peter Khramov:

When there are illustrations (even without arrows), and the normal description of the differences in the text, dolepit comparison is not much difficult.

07.08.2015 15:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And who is willing to do it? A photo on the differences males from females shown)))

07.08.2015 10:13, Alex Dumchus:

Moduza procris

07.08.2015 10:12, Leon Ortlieb:

Peter raised the issue of the determinant site. I support, I think that's somewhere around so it should look .. The differences illustrate the differences in the photo and arrows and circles to identify those specified area. How could a Belyanko. Type "inner corner of the upper wing Belyanko step" etc ..And especially important with similar views ..

This is coupled with the description of the type, greatly simplify the definition.

07.08.2015 9:25, Shamil Murtazin:

After an hour (if not mistaken) view photos after downloading is not correct. This will make the moderators.

07.08.2015 8:31, Tatiana Selena:

It is understood, and how to fix!

07.08.2015 7:29, Alex Dumchus:

It pachliopta aristolochiae. Tatiana vskidku immediately struck by two significant differences: Rumyantsev never had tails, they are sometimes at p. memnon, abdomen at p. Aristotle red, well, etc., etc. ....

07.08.2015 5:50, Yuri Semejkin:

In such cases, the name written in the comments with a question mark, or boot put the point in the circle - not exactly the kind defined.

07.08.2015 5:05, Tatiana Selena:

I'm not special, this seemed like!

06.08.2015 22:05, Peter Khramov:

That is progress because progress.

06.08.2015 21:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Hmm ... neillyustrirovannyh species Rhopalocera was 151

06.08.2015 15:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Determination confirmed Matov AY ZIN

06.08.2015 12:25, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

06.08.2015 12:25, Alex Dumchus:

No of course! It pachliopta aristolochiae

06.08.2015 4:09, Tatiana Selena:

Just did not work!

05.08.2015 21:24, Peter Khramov:

1450 and 75 cm (frame with a big step).

05.08.2015 21:14, Peter Khramov:

If there is an instance, the banner, then put it off for you in the winter. Weight and size to measure and accomplish your goal.

05.08.2015 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I can take potestit returning in February. full load within 15 days garantiruyu.kakoy her weight and dimensions of the transportable state

05.08.2015 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Traps and screens: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/2041. Foty is not in nature, nature will do later. For users sculpting discount on the screen 1000 rubles. Review provided on the site.

05.08.2015 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Yeah. Nun collectively affect!

05.08.2015 19:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Patamushta. Constantine Efetov: comments for photos and Tucson (1)

05.08.2015 16:35, Peter Khramov:

Why would he begs you? Like, all the others consciously visit the site every day so? -)
How insects will move, I again potormoshu curators, who have not appeared on the site.

05.08.2015 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Answered phone.

05.08.2015 14:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter!!! And I have not forgotten our conversation! Or has died as a theme?

05.08.2015 14:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I do not know the size of the flower, but something tells me that cabbage is - by your eyes)))

05.08.2015 14:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This begs the question! And the man knows that he is the curator ???))) In general, he heard about the site ???

05.08.2015 10:59, Peter Khramov:

Correctly I understand that kind is simply not attached at boot time?

05.08.2015 10:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Tatiana Selena.

05.08.2015 8:29, Tatiana Selena: This species is identified correctly.

05.08.2015 5:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Polygonia c-album (Linnaeus, 1758)

04.08.2015 22:08, Peter Khramov:

Ugums. And Stas either. That's how we live.

04.08.2015 21:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No curator 7 months on the site? Ohhh!

04.08.2015 21:33, Fedor Ovechkin:

Can habitat will: open, xerophytic community near suburban areas of butterflies were there Lycaena thersamon, Hyponephele lupinus, Pontia edusa, Iphiclides podalirius?

04.08.2015 21:32, Shamil Murtazin:

They are there a bunch!

04.08.2015 21:22, Fedor Ovechkin:

:) Dilettantes excusable on the abdomen do not watch! Type correctly defined, have fun.

04.08.2015 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Flower, the small :) Cornflower spreading Centaurea diffusa .

04.08.2015 21:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) Vasily looking at belly, not the color. Kind is very variable, the males and females.

04.08.2015 21:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elophila interruptalis / Igor Sakhno Nymphula nitidulata / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.08.2015 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Igor, please indicate precisely the geography, which is understandable to you, is not always clear to others. :)

04.08.2015 21:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

04.08.2015 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elophila interruptalis / Tentatively identified / Igor Sakhno Elophila nymphaeata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.08.2015 20:38, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.08.2015 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

04.08.2015 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

04.08.2015 20:35, Fedor Ovechkin:

Undecided, just a guess, Basil on photo # 33972 male with the same color, and photo # 33970 female on the other. If agreed, the right to information to the photo set. Probably just the variability in color.

04.08.2015 20:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elophila interruptalis / Tentatively identified / Igor Sakhno Elophila nymphaeata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.08.2015 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why do you think so?

04.08.2015 20:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

Male?

04.08.2015 18:40, Fedor Ovechkin:

Not measured, unfortunately! Yes, and I do not remember, it was a year ago. Only on the flower (inflorescence) can navigate. I do not mind the cabbage.

04.08.2015 16:13, Leon Ortlieb:

It got so bad, apparently frayed, and after one fotovystrela fall ..
But similar to those http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Satyrium_Esculi. Ph other butterflies, the Portuguese, who would like to put more, not yet. Is there still tolstogolovka. But it is not in the bill.
Main European butterfly (Charaxes jasius), the biggest, has failed to see .. What a pity.But he saw another, no less interesting, as the biggest "European land crocodile" catches insects on the flowers, and then spat trapped in the mouth petals.
I told here: http://club.foto.ru/gallery/photos/2259274/?&author_id=87270&sort=date&next_photo_id=2259917&prev_photo_id=2257121

04.08.2015 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Et simply nedoponyatki. I'm really afraid that we are not about modernizing all fichah know ...

04.08.2015 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Dim, I do not mean that. I mean, by comparing "dolgost" especially and there is nobody here.

04.08.2015 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

For Spain is. :)

04.08.2015 13:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And why compare? Cyclists do not you invent! The taste and color ...- here will not please everyone - so show how it looks like and how much it costs, and then everyone decides for himself

04.08.2015 13:12, Leon Ortlieb:

Maybe for Spain it is? From the point to the border of Spain 30 kilometers if the air ..

04.08.2015 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

That I proposed :) Why watch a family, if you can only race. :)
there is no question mark. :)

04.08.2015 13:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

I was working with a small taxa: family, tribe, of families do not look. :))

04.08.2015 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, and you really do not know how to select the kind of Portugal? Ooh ... It turns out that the site is no longer a feature of any lack of advertising than their adequacy: -)

04.08.2015 12:59, Peter Khramov:

One thing to take people to the side, when really a thread of a particular site in the tropics, but we have no nifiga. Another thing - when the difference is small (a selection from them and did not have). That is wrong nifiga, I think so.

04.08.2015 12:57, Peter Khramov:

Long. On the other hand, to compare a ...

04.08.2015 12:51, Peter Khramov:

Can. In the "Directory" instead of the characteristic "family" choose "Custom taxon."

04.08.2015 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

In my opinion, too. :)

04.08.2015 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, are you on this and Portugal. blues brought?
You can specifically by the nature. :)

04.08.2015 10:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where this animal?

04.08.2015 10:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

For Portugal, is not given. Interesting!
I checked on the Fauna Europaea really only two kinds.

04.08.2015 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.08.2015 10:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What size? In my cabbage is

04.08.2015 10:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How long is all very you

04.08.2015 7:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.08.2015 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, I do not laugh. Actually I prefer the source whence infa taken. You, after all, not every hour of the monitor to adjust infu here if she went there. Those resources head of other people and infa pomenyatsya may at any time without coordination with you.Sinev the only constant, because republish it no one is going in the near millennium and Internet-piece flexible (

04.08.2015 7:30, Basil Sergienko:

Scotopteryx chenopodiata

04.08.2015 2:12, Peter Khramov:

You just have to invert the search term
From here in more detail ...

04.08.2015 1:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Subscription generally does not use. Anyway, I watch all the events. They are not very much.
In general, to make a subscription - it must first get it somehow draw, ie click, and then open somehow different, not all events.
As for the "new" feature - it is the idea already is - a technical comment. You just have to invert the search condition.And can leave it at that. Just the usual writing of hotelok discharge, which are not difficult to do, but are pleasant and reduce the "energy".

04.08.2015 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you laugh galleries?

04.08.2015 0:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, who is more convenient site, and to whom and leps it. Here, you know, whether identical preferences can not be. Especially I consider that to impose the site a bad taste (everyone has the right to choose). I give links to those resources that are used to view myself as determined by the photo. First Source is not bad :)

04.08.2015 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not infa flies in these columns ever.
Sometimes flies determining if the transfer at a time when the author is not over the time limit for independent editing LK :)

04.08.2015 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Et where it flies it and when? If this one is happening - write more on the examples, will rule.

04.08.2015 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And here, of course, too.
And as for the publication of photos in agreement with leps. it, certainly knew: first of all, by the name of Paolo Mazzei :)

04.08.2015 0:27, Peter Khramov:

Offhand - gimor. Bo to speed processing of all kinds of comments on one page need a clear sign of the "last". To implement your proposals will need another sign of "the last non-technical." At the same time the disappearance of branches after the transfer in its own logical transfer ends normally active discussion.Another thing is that, for example, you are interested in the fate of a particular photo. But it has to work at the level of subscriptions (such as all the comments for my ph, ph as well as that interest me (last selected manually)). That will be the case.
What do you think?

04.08.2015 0:23, Peter Khramov:

Citizens, let us not going to send people to the blue, Funetu fauna of Europe and Leps.Itu, yeah. It has everything and mulberries and more convenient. Ie Just ottedova. And leps.ita too.

04.08.2015 0:21, Peter Khramov:

Walking it is necessary not to leps.it, whose authors have kindly agreed to publish their photos on our website and on lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tax[]=92&country[]=49.

04.08.2015 0:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You can "walk" here: http://www.leps.it/
This site is the closest)
I do the same in the Lycaenidae there the wash my hands (my-I do not know) ((

03.08.2015 23:45, Leon Ortlieb:

I think that it's some other Portuguese beauty, but what else is out there and fly, I do not know ..

03.08.2015 23:39, Leon Ortlieb:

Thank you! The task is complicated .. On the third .. Just a couple of seconds and put!

03.08.2015 23:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, with high probability the correct definition. The veins on the upper corner of the front wing yellow: an important feature of the COIP. To say more certainty is needed underside.

03.08.2015 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.08.2015 23:05, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil, I'm sorry. I copied and sent to the search. Why double the link was not clear .. Oh well ..

03.08.2015 22:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Make no mistake. Here communicate, communicate comments under photos. These comments, of course, it is convenient to keep track of a single click in the "Last in the community" (http://lepidoptera.ru/community/all?hid=1).
And here it comes, for example, snap photos to a form that is receive technical comments. And yet, in the "Last in the community" (http://lepidoptera.ru/community/all?hid=1) This photo no longer exists. Absolutely.It seems to me that it is not logical. Yes, you can see "all the comments in a row" (http://lepidoptera.ru/community/all), but not all will find this hyperlink in the text and it is banal uncomfortable.
That's why I suggest:
in http://lepidoptera.ru/community/all?hid=1 for photo output is not the last technical comments, if any. If there is no (i.e.all comments engineering) - completely hidden in this issue, or post a photo.
add. as there are sort by date and time of the comment or change of official information - even the "non-technical" comments will be properly sorted.

03.08.2015 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

03.08.2015 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

03.08.2015 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

03.08.2015 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

03.08.2015 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

03.08.2015 20:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, a lot of chances that he is in blue under a different name, or we properly define :)
About moratorium on new types of recall.

03.08.2015 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Mona did not look. The new database it is already present. But before loading the new base taxa still do not add.

03.08.2015 19:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

It looks like, but it is not on the site. View will look :)

03.08.2015 19:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.08.2015 19:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Coenonympha amaryllis / Alexandr Zhakov Coenonympha glycerion / Yuriy Karpov.

03.08.2015 19:27, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, the cause is not clear. Explain in detail. It is possible to speed and on the phone (today will be active until midnight, and then turn into a pumpkin).

03.08.2015 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Correct name of a subspecies of the form that is accepted on the site.

03.08.2015 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.08.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Krupnoglazka Egeria in the Moscow region is really prevalent locally.
And in the eastern region on personal observations and at all rare.So, yesterday, having gone for mushrooms, just to the east of Defense unexpectedly I found another location where it is plentiful and fairly and clearly in the second generation, which is the species
It was passed the route with a total length of about 14 kilometers and all along the route by single individuals met members of the species.Interesting facts about the locality where the population found:
"Near Fryazevo long been rural cottage Marshal Voroshilov. The People's Commissar of the USSR liked to hunt grouse here together with colleagues of the Civil War Marshal Budyonny. On capercaillie hunting they came from Moscow to" Packard "Voroshilov.We traveled by car, the road is allowed, and then transplanted to the cart, chief Fryazevskogo controlled hunting. Later, however, for the assassination of the first head of the Voroshilov Fryazevskogo ohothozjajstva N. Dubakina put in the Gulag.Elite Hunting has always contributed to the creation and prosperity of many game farms ".
Taken from here: http://pro-fryazevo.narod.ru/organizations.html
I ask, of course sorry for offtopic. But it is in such places often find interesting species))
Probably because of the "reserve" of these places ....

03.08.2015 18:26, Yuriy Karpov:

Corrected.

03.08.2015 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melanargia russiae / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

03.08.2015 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melanargia russiae / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

03.08.2015 18:11, Yuriy Karpov:

I dare to doubt the determination of the species. Amaryllis two subspecies in our weight. And there is clearly eastern Coenonympha glycerion (Borkhausen, 1788).

03.08.2015 13:50, Shamil Murtazin:

While being away - came Podalirius. Somewhere I lost one rear wing. It's a shame (
Podalirius, by the way, natural, taken in the pupal stage. Taken by me and a little podroschennye two copies released back to the same cherry.
Eater cruciferous did not come out, no way to test the viability - chrysalis rigid; Estimated Phigalia sp.apparently he went into diapause, but the tail moves. Prompt how to store them in the past year Malin lasiocampidae all spoiled and did not live (

03.08.2015 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I gave a working link. Leon, be careful when copying)
The page "live" under the number 27790, and not as you do under the number 277 907 790)))

03.08.2015 13:25, Peter Khramov:

In the near future we will try to crawl into a thread of the park to make a photo gallery, and then post the entire Old illustrations.

03.08.2015 13:15, Leon Ortlieb:

Vasily that opened:

Http://lepidoptera.ru/community/2http://lepidoptera.ru/community/277907790 Page Not Found

Try searching for desired material, starting from the home page.

Those others do not zygaenidae, try to unearth the evening ..

03.08.2015 13:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Promalactis enopisema ?

03.08.2015 12:18, Alexander Belousov:

Melanargia russiae

03.08.2015 12:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

Pieris rapae?

03.08.2015 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon will correct: according to the European species))
The curator there and he is very well-known expert on zygaenidae)
But unfortunately it is almost invisible on the site (((
There is a list of who is doing what on the website: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/27790

03.08.2015 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.08.2015 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ancylis laetana / Confidently identified / Tomislav Jemric.

03.08.2015 10:42, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil, and is there and the curator of the Portuguese species? I still have a couple of obscure evening cleared, find lay ..

03.08.2015 10:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Singing, and that the proposal on the screen? Where can I see the design, size and cost.

03.08.2015 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis rivularis / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

03.08.2015 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis rivularis / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

02.08.2015 23:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I now also in plain text. The screen for night fishing I need. I wrote about this many times.

02.08.2015 23:28, Shamil Murtazin:

The reason for my "fi", I think, is clear? Come to think how to make ...
Maybe the parameter hid = 1 complicate the conclusion? I propose in this case, the output of the last non-technical comments, if any. If there is no (ie, all comments engineering) - completely hidden in this issue, or post a photo.

02.08.2015 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, as it may appear at all? ..

02.08.2015 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.08.2015 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ind. with fused spots. Caught at similar)
I put until inaccurate. Let look curator)

02.08.2015 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Zygaena ephialtes / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb Zygaena filipendulae / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2015 22:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Cropped - is that with the parameter "hid = 1"

02.08.2015 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, thank you :)

02.08.2015 20:44, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neptis rivularis?

02.08.2015 20:38, Fedor Ovechkin:

Neptis rivularis?

02.08.2015 16:42, Peter Khramov:

The trimmed - is what? http://lepidoptera.ru/community/all?

02.08.2015 12:22, Peter Khramov:

OK. As soon as the theme of the public, understand absolutely plain text:

Basil, you're talking about: just in a backpack somewhere Whatever walked / rode just need to save every gram of weight and cubic centimeter volume .
I say true. There are many options for trips with a rucksack where every gram vymerivat not necessary.Oh, and if you do not go, and go, and then even more so.

After that, you say, to bind sheets, a lot of time is not necessary. What's with the backpack can go where not drive a car. And so on and so forth. Where did all this come from - not znams, Bo has nothing to do with the previous deskussiey.Because I love you and I ask, what is it?

So much for our tutoshny discussion.

If you send in conversations sheet vs frame screen and Samodelov vs everything ready, like as everything here is clear that both options have their pros and cons. Or does not it obvious? Or it is necessary to spread out on the shelves?

02.08.2015 12:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you so much.
Sometimes the text of flies, several times have to put down the name of the species. :)

02.08.2015 11:16, Tatiana Selena:

Thank you so much!

02.08.2015 9:54, Leon Ortlieb:

The most unpleasant thing is that I have, download and went to sleep ..

02.08.2015 9:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leon, a big request, do not forget to put down the geography and date-time. We both kind of learned how to do the latter. But geography is "holy." :) No matter how banal kind of was not.

02.08.2015 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I have a favor to ask.
Please try to explain intelligibly man in the comment to this photo: http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 42042 that the field "The date and time of shooting / fishing" and "Location shooting / fishing" have to fill no matter what the butterfly is shown in the picture if the site It claims to be even the slightest earnest, and not a regular free hosting of pictures.The result of my request is clear: "how about a wall peas" (((
Becomes annoying and already afraid that the tear.
Maybe if the two Post immediately appealed to him with the same request it will have an effect)

02.08.2015 0:27, Shamil Murtazin:

Question on the tape yet. If extreme technical comments, the "trimmed" the tape has not see this photo. It is not quite logical, I think.

02.08.2015 0:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.08.2015 0:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, I looked. Photos are excellent, I said earlier. "Crash" with framing in the series took place at.

01.08.2015 23:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.08.2015 23:48, Igor Sakhno:

Male, perhaps.

01.08.2015 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Case minutes))

01.08.2015 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #42004 group.

01.08.2015 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the two must also be probably the associate. I think Tomislav explain how to do it, you will not work :)

01.08.2015 23:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, look at all the photos gallery Sergey. :)

01.08.2015 23:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Sergey, if the resolution allows photos may cost them a little tighter crop? .. You have a great series of photos, but the butterflies in the frame is occupied, I think, a very small part. I can help if there are difficulties. =)

01.08.2015 23:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Night screens so that I needed. The proposal was not very crisp. He was passing through Moscow. Tomorrow at lunch already flying.

01.08.2015 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So what? .. That you what?
This is to ensure that the time will take no more (or maybe a little more) than collecting this design.

And without the backpack even easier. And the grass is green. And the sky is blue. Basil, what it was?
But it was the fact that without a backpack on the backs and on foot with equipment far from home do not move if there is no car.If you shove all their belongings away here already needs a backpack at least ..
And now in this forest man with a backpack is much more mobile than on wheels :)

I hope you do not conclude from this that it is necessary to shine a candle? ..
Bezuslovnono not make such conclusions: it would be foolish-if there are other, more contemporary sources.And earlier caught with a candle or something similar; there was no electricity yet. Look at the years to describe most types of :)

01.08.2015 21:46, Peter Khramov:

In fact, to bind to a preselected pair of trees a couple of ropes, and then stretched between the sheet over five clothespins enough ... Well, a maximum of ten minutes))
So what? .. It's you for what?

And with a backpack and on foot, you can go there - where not pass any car (including the most feature-rich and SUV).
And without the backpack even easier.And the grass is green. And the sky is blue. Basil, what was it?

The butterfly still on that fly: a white cloth or on this design: Believe me.
Well butterflies - this is not the Lord God. There is not need faith, and the results of adequate research.

If successful then the conditions will be flying to the canvas and illuminated ordinary candle.
I hope you do not conclude from this that it is necessary to shine a candle? ..

Just in practice it is quite possible to do without this know-how.
Basil, you can do without a lot of things. But not for all of it makes sense to do.

01.08.2015 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.08.2015 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, thank you for your understanding)))
An interesting point: did not take with him any equipment other than a pair of bags and stains (went for mushrooms, instead of looking for insects). Net self-other did not take too. Therefore, it is collected in the truest sense of the bare hands)))
Myrmidon there is so much that the usual everywhere, "Gia Lai"Colias hyaleand invisible at all.I see a picture for the third season in a row :)

01.08.2015 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In fact, to bind to a preselected pair of trees a couple of ropes, and then stretched between the sheet over five clothespins enough ... Well, a maximum of ten minutes))
And with a backpack and on foot, you can go there - where not pass any car (including the most feature-rich and SUV).Butterflies do not care what fly: a white cloth or on this design: Believe.
I repeat: there are important external conditions. If successful then the conditions will be flying to the canvas and illuminated ordinary candle. Believe me; catching the light of the first year and not since the 'Net came home)
You excuse me for being climbed.Just in practice it is quite possible to do without this know-how.

01.08.2015 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Just backpack anywhere Whatever walked / drove need to save at every gram of weight and cubic centimeter volume
It is not true. Again we see only with his bell. But there are others. However, the test was still not Freestuff. Freestuff all set.

01.08.2015 17:01, Alexander Belousov:

Value, Vasily, was worth it!

01.08.2015 16:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Long thought is, I download this Meshcherskaya beauty as has already put members of the species in abundance ....
In the end, I decided: it was too beautiful and high-quality specimen proved)

01.08.2015 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I would potestit, but prefer to use the classics: plain white sheet on ropes strung between two trees. Weight and volume of a backpack almost nothing, and that the effectiveness of the same. The main thing is to have chosen the right weather, time and place of fishing.Just a backpack somewhere Whatever walked / rode just need to save every gram of weight and volume of a cubic centimeter))

01.08.2015 15:07, Peter Khramov:

Yes, show something of itself. I wonder if anyone goes somewhere in the near future to potestit. But, well, a couple of pieces already distributed, this is enough, the benefit of doubt tama already left.
How I do pictures - posted.The design was very stable, with neubivaemaya frame plus easy to carry from place to place, even in a fully assembled condition. Even for Japanese umbrellas are enjoying very surezno dyuralievy frame (no fiberglass Galimov). It is worth all of this for less sphinx.

01.08.2015 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For me it is very much on top of it resembles our commonLycia hirtaria
Here near Moscow: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40077
To be honest at first did not even think that this is a new kind of))

01.08.2015 8:12, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. That's what I was looking for: http://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Atalanta_39_0281-0286.pdf,
Poroyus and I find more of cambodia group.
It Stichophthalma suffusa suffusa, Leech, 1892, cf, Szechuan, W.China
Please add the look and move.

01.08.2015 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tatiana, everything is very simple. It should be in its LC enter the number of photos you want to add to the group in a small window, which nazoditsya at the bottom of a large window and is called "number of other pictures of the same individual" and then press the bottom of the page that nazyvatsya "Refresh data and delete the marked images" .The only important consideration is that you can add a photo to the group one by one. Tie together the two existing groups are not technically. In the case of such an error: it had to correct my business. So if suddenly made her feel free and write: I will fix it without any problems.
Good luck)))

01.08.2015 1:38, Tatiana Selena:

Cool, how interesting!

01.08.2015 1:36, Tatiana Selena:

Thank you!

01.08.2015 0:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill: the idea did not catch on right (left early and arrived late to goodness knows where).
Somehow I feel that Darya and Tatyana took notes normally and as a guide to remedy its shortcomings.In my opinion it is quite adequate people and they will feel good seeing that there is moderation on the site, which is not only the transfer or the definition of the photo, and in the fact that the moderator may indicate their shortcomings and help in correcting thereof.And the man who perceives he made a fair comment on the merits as an offense - simply is not far .....
I apologize for the harshness, but I think to pity in this case is not about anything (((

31.07.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fedor, I certainly do not insist: it is up to you, but in my opinion the geographic coordinates are not appropriate to the author's comments, and in line geography because it represents one unit)))
Example: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/38554
Only in your writing The case of "leg.Last garbage " at the end of the line there is no need to write: a butterfly is not collected and photographed in nature.

31.07.2015 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, but I do not mind)
Let me explain a bit.
I do not have to associate in groups and it is not planned initially.
As for the comment: it should be. Beginners should be taught (dry and clearly, not lisping) and show the example: on I and the moderator (one of the main tasks of all resources Moderator: to maintain and to keep order in his field).I was the second such case in a week and I think they will be repeated if time does not pay attention to it. Then by the same will be more hassle. Every few fotgrafy two more pictures .....so on to infinity (((
EXIF needs me exclusively to match the time of the shooting in the preparation of about groups and based on this I insist that it is necessary: ​​therefore remind you, and do not take anyone's head.

31.07.2015 21:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Show that there is about the night the screens ...

31.07.2015 18:18, Peter Khramov:

One thread of night screens or with the help of Japanese umbrellas in the near future is going to catch? There apupitelnye things.

31.07.2015 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

31.07.2015 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala coniuncta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.07.2015 16:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala coniuncta / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.07.2015 12:54, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, it swallowtail. Soon we should pupate.

31.07.2015 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.07.2015 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thyrgorina jankowskii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.07.2015 12:02, Tatiana Selena:

Well uchtu and read how to do it!

31.07.2015 12:01, Daria Milkova:

And here is the second, she polenivee, yesterday did not eat.

31.07.2015 11:56, Daria Milkova:

Dill sat on two such beauty, my mother wanted to knock down, and I just arrived in time, like it papilio machaon? Less than half a day, he ate a large piece of dill - sits on what is left of it. Maybe you watch them?

31.07.2015 11:52, Alexander Belousov:

Wonderful shot! Very good light!

31.07.2015 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I do not know as of correctness, you say? You again vosprimesh as an attack and teachings, or anything personal, just a thought about the site.
If you're so hard a few times a year to link multiple photos into groups that you attack people who just appeared on the site, give up this function.People do not know yet, that can be linked to the group, and if they know it is not given to all so quickly. We all have mistakes, be tolerant and not to stick out your self. Remember how you and I asked Peter to fix our schools, he once said that it was not his job, learn to do right. Silently he corrected.:))
If you think that your comment is very polite, the side it looks like a hit and teachings "of a moderator."
You do not have the people once again fooling with us EXIF ​​and Peter too, well, just is not a vital function to link multiple photos to the group.Expressing purely an opinion, "I teach," please do not be offended, hurt in any way do not want to. The purpose of that would be the people was nice and comfortable stay on the site.
If my posts on this site is incorrect, please write here. The same will be corrected.

31.07.2015 6:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha oedippus / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

31.07.2015 6:26, Alexander Belousov:

Coenonympha oedippus

31.07.2015 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tatiana, ask you about the very same thing I asked a few days ago Daria :)
"a lesson, please communicate in groups.
This is done in those cases where the same specimen is shown in two or more images
And you can do it in your LC at any time. And I tied this group as an example.My job as the moderator is not to bind the group for all users, and to identify correct errors already connected.
If you need help, we will explain everything and tell.
Especially since you obviously know better what pictures in this group should be. "

I think that their actions now I'm not a mistake, and the reason for such thoughts were the date and time specified for these images: given the fact that they are made at an interval of 2 minutes, giving rise to the action :)

Peter, this is again one of those cases where a vital EXIF ​​(what I asked you, and a few days ago).See for yourself: it is repeated (((

31.07.2015 5:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41989 group.

31.07.2015 5:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41988 group.

31.07.2015 0:59, Peter Khramov:

A still live. Typically, such a twisting go to prog without OCR. Where electronic issue - not a banner, I do not have)

31.07.2015 0:12, Tatiana Selena: This species is identified correctly.

30.07.2015 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, the first thing check Lasiocampidae or Arctiidae. I think that they have to start from the dance :)

30.07.2015 20:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Ecliptopera silaceata / Female.

30.07.2015 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.07.2015 20:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ceratonema christophi.

30.07.2015 20:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

30.07.2015 19:42, Basil Sergienko:

Ecliptoptera think silaceata

30.07.2015 17:23, Alexander Belousov:

Alas, Peter, no compilations, clean the scan sheet "living" book. Just contrast clocked in Photoshop. Where offer electronic version?

30.07.2015 17:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! It seems then too Ceratoneta christophi?

30.07.2015 16:54, Leon Ortlieb:

Here he is! No idea how to find his mom and dad ..

30.07.2015 16:29, Leon Ortlieb:

Thank you! I've got another beautiful beast (reprimand with the Portuguese accent). But can anyone help me or tell me, among some of the family .. Now look zapostchu!

30.07.2015 15:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I have to drive)))

30.07.2015 15:24, Peter Khramov:

Portugal et cool. Not often dotedova people arrives ...

30.07.2015 15:23, Peter Khramov:

Well Duc and Alexander obviously a fragment of an electric version of the thread there Dejavu.

30.07.2015 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Copyrights are called (photo belongs to the author) :)
Delete, really: is far from gone.

30.07.2015 15:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And I have to have an electronic version! Mystic!

30.07.2015 15:15, Leon Ortlieb:

The only picture I have of this kind in the archive .. Soon there will perefotat .. Made in Portugal last night vacation ....

30.07.2015 14:55, Peter Khramov:

What are the rights of the owner photos ... I do not know. I have not heard ...; -))
And on the topic - OK, a little later transferred.

30.07.2015 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I support the proposal on the rights of the owner of Alexander photo.
It is necessary to leave the last post from Alexandra 29.07.2015 15:19 and the rest get out anywhere.
TE Requires move or delete everything after it became clear that the photo does not melanistic.

30.07.2015 14:18, Alexander Belousov:

Yes, this book is. But there is no such subspecies -ssp. moscovitus Bryk & Eisner, 1938

30.07.2015 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

We take photo 37722.

30.07.2015 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

30.07.2015 14:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Emmelina monodactyla / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.07.2015 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you! :)

30.07.2015 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Perhaps it was necessary to put in inaccurate, sort of one kind in Russia alone, but in the region and several species are very similar. I would hope Sineva :)

30.07.2015 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ceratonema christophi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.07.2015 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter suffered all this in the "smoking room".

30.07.2015 13:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Apoda limacodes?. Rhode Apoda catalog of 40 regions absent.

30.07.2015 13:34, Yuri Semejkin:

No, Alexander, everything is much more banal. It's just a trim building BPI. As Ira said, Peter, too, are interested in what is the background I shoot. So if you're interested, wait il, she took off and the building, and indeed sfotat against this background.

30.07.2015 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sitting in a car? :)

30.07.2015 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.07.2015 13:12, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Photos in full - https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6412/92726046.68/0_aad61_ce87db09_orig

30.07.2015 13:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Threw the shot Matt, he gave the same definition.

30.07.2015 11:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pose it did not

30.07.2015 11:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Guide to the Butterflies of Russia and Adjacent Territories: Hesperiidae, Papilionidae, Pieridae, Satyridae

30.07.2015 10:45, Alexander Belousov:

What Tuzova the book is written? I took from this -V.K.Tuzov -Babochki Russia Volume 1

30.07.2015 10:35, Leon Ortlieb:

Peter is just the theory of evolution - is faith.
About scientific it is not out of the question!
One of the tenets of science states that "Any experiment must be possible to repeat the check."
The theory of evolution is not repeated, and it is not possible to verify. Therefore the theory (or rather some fantasy).

30.07.2015 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In general: the site bored .... Butterfly throw what? Last night to catch :)

30.07.2015 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, in our part of this system.
Foundations, and it all starts with the basics as it is known (the scanner is not working, so we had to reshoot, sorry for the quality).

30.07.2015 10:27, Fedor Ovechkin:

And characteristically, new species are often described in those taxa that are popular with collectors (in the broad sense). Communication with commerce on the face, and the theory of evolution - alas!

30.07.2015 10:26, Peter Khramov:

If you really are interested in "the history of the emergence of the theory ...", it makes sense to get acquainted with different sources. Fortunately we wrote on this subject, not only historians and other prazdnointeresuyuschiesya, but the characters themselves, and living witnesses.
As for the theory itself, let us not forget that this is the theory.And as for its adequacy - it is like a democracy. The thing is, of course, not perfect, but for the time being Lucci did not come up.
I hope to pripleteniya issue of faith in this discussion we shall not reach.

30.07.2015 10:24, Yuri Semejkin:

The subspecies is listed in the comments of the author. It is also indicated that the butterfly is similar to the specified type. In vain, I probably threw it here, though al. Butterfly side asserts itself, such as it is, takes place in the region.
Correctly or not, she is sitting.I can not say anything about this, except that it sits on the vertical plane of the metal, which probably is not as convenient as an example on the twig.

30.07.2015 10:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, what this office. science.? Everything is relative.

30.07.2015 10:08, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil is very interesting history of the origin of the theory of evolution. Seen the movie ..

English Field biologist Alfred Russel Wallace on the instructions of the British Crown was 4 years on the islands of the Malay Archipelago. He studied the flora and fauna.For example, he would shoot any animal, remove the skin and sends it to England, he describes his appearance and newfound fame is as a scientist, and the animal skins are sold at auctions. Museums of the world compete to see who will receive this newly discovered species of animal in your collection and do not pay small money ..With this money, Wallace can finance his expedition.

But Wallace was ill with malaria and raves. Inflammation of the brain sees the vision. He was a scientist and when ill, and he took a pencil in hand and the delirium that he saw, wrote the paper. Disable. When he came to, he continued to write what he saw in his delirium ..

You may ask why I'm telling you something?
Hmm ...So there is an hour of origin of the theory of evolution ...

Having recovered, he wrote four letters to his friend Darwin (Darwin was ordained a priest of the Anglican Church). Wallace describes his vision of the origin of species. (the nonsense)


Darwin steals the crazy idea of ​​Wallace, gives it as his own, develops and becomes famous.Perhaps, you should know that Wallace himself was also a staunch advocate of spiritualism ..

Not only is this a crazy idea, this priest and this spiritist,
It becomes in fact a religion in some countries professing atheism penetrated all strata of society of all nations. This crazy idea called itself scientific. Do not conceivable! Is not it?

30.07.2015 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

30.07.2015 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

30.07.2015 9:59, Fedor Ovechkin:

As for the taxonomy, especially at the level of species, genera, in my opinion, works recognized authoritative opinions of individual authors. Communication with the theory of evolution is not captured.

30.07.2015 9:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tuzova from the book exactly as I wrote - and on page Osipova, apparently as he wants)))

30.07.2015 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nevertheless, in the office. Science works this is as far as I know :)

30.07.2015 9:34, Fedor Ovechkin:

Not at all, not the whole world.

30.07.2015 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With his teachings, I mean :)

30.07.2015 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think because of the angle picture, here mistake. very similar to geleheidu.

30.07.2015 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nola aerugula / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.07.2015 9:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Imprecise definition of this subspecies, if you know you need to specify. :)
Details: you this species, this subspecies, imprecise definition does not include subspecies and among species.
But to be honest, when I did not see that Calamotropha paludella, so sit.

30.07.2015 9:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

Basil, the world continues to live with ... Darwin?

30.07.2015 9:07, Basil Sergienko:

Nola aerugula likely

30.07.2015 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

30.07.2015 8:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

30.07.2015 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

30.07.2015 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

30.07.2015 6:22, Alexander Belousov:

Probably so. They write that presented subspecies only clearly visible differences. The rest are missing. But why this sub-species is not on the page? If it flies - to be!
And in general, it is desirable to all subtypes indicate the place of residence! Or "letters" sorry? :-)

30.07.2015 5:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, like everything here sort through, but a little add - why in some publications or websites featured Sciota hostilis, and others. Nephopterix hostilis. Here's an explanation ...
Yuri! We are talking about one and the same form. With the generic name is often confusion: different authors in the genus include species on the understanding, of course, for some of the specified grounds.Hence, it turns out that the same kind in different publications (authors) can be assigned to different genera.
Now all Locked.

30.07.2015 5:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! The subspecies is probably not necessary to specify, as definition is not accurate?

30.07.2015 5:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Opened in Scopariinae. Defined Kirpichnikova VA Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS.

30.07.2015 4:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Opened in Scopariinae identified the Kirpichnikova VA Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS.

30.07.2015 3:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

30.07.2015 3:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

30.07.2015 3:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My special smile this categorical statement of the reduced article: "Butterflies do not sit down during the day on tree trunks, but Kettlewell suggested that they do it, and therefore glued to the trunk of dead butterflies - this is the origin of the famous picture." . ......
Who has not watched the afternoon sitting on the trunks of moths, shovel, etc.?
It happened and tried to disprove Darwin's theory ..... Yet the world continues to live with him.

30.07.2015 0:35, Fedor Ovechkin:

Euphydryas ichnea

29.07.2015 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aemona amathusia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.07.2015 22:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Andrey Polstyanoy Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.07.2015 21:59, Peter Khramov:

Yes lana. Normal such offtopic. And if you suddenly as a result of offtopic we begin to adequately use the word "ecology" (though the site is more or less the profile), and not, as it does the yellow press, then all will be cool.

29.07.2015 21:44, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Yes, the spelling should be respected).

29.07.2015 21:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Aemona amathusia / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

29.07.2015 21:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander! I did not dig this kind of never - see descriptions of these species. Start with this

29.07.2015 21:10, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. I'm interested in significant differences between:
Stichophthalma cambodia (Hewitson, 1862),
Stichophthalma uemurai Nishimura, 1998
and accurate illustration Stichophthalma fruhstorferi Röber, 1903.
I have a material and illustrations on them, but there is a lot of confusion. Can you help?

29.07.2015 20:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nicholas does not put commas :)

29.07.2015 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not rewritten. Commas was not simple. And geography, it is necessary: ​​all-would have to write)

29.07.2015 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This Aemona amathusia

29.07.2015 20:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Defined Oleg Pekarsky on mobiole:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&st=27050

29.07.2015 20:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia artemisiae / Sergey Didenko Cucullia lindei / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.07.2015 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You can delete all .... kommentaii from the outset.
And I'll go so far posvechu. It is necessary to catch the last melanistic (((

29.07.2015 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Now, Basil, I understood why the geography corresponded. :)

29.07.2015 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aricia artaxerxes / Nikolay Grebennikov Eumedonia eumedon / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.07.2015 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aricia artaxerxes / Nikolay Grebennikov Eumedonia eumedon / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.07.2015 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

29.07.2015 20:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

29.07.2015 20:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Railway http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFndlR3zIds

29.07.2015 20:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

What is the relationship, much of the following is written to the photo and mind?
The same will be removed?

29.07.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah ... And we have produced the world's best glass wool, asbestos plate and so forth. "Joy." This brought us to the Danes to manufacture from himself. The company "Rockwool" called (former association "Mosasbotermosteklo"). Here's another environment "improves" (((Thank God phenol ceased to pour into the river (before pouring waste) .....

29.07.2015 20:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.07.2015 19:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander! Write exactly what you need, and then I was confused (I had better full Latin name, the authors)

29.07.2015 19:52, Peter Khramov:

Leon, there Stas Korb in the comments to the video wrote that it was.

29.07.2015 19:51, Peter Khramov:

And there is some ... Zoology Paleontology is not bad to astronomy, as well as biology and physics.

29.07.2015 19:50, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy.Spasibo. It is a pity only two pictures. I was hoping for more. Disappointed. What is even cambodia, well, louisa deviatkini. S.eamsei me there, just a darker, the site has a photo, and a few uemurai too, but the butterfly, like a picture on uemurai, some catchers issue for fruhstorferi. Actually, I was looking for significant differences between the three species mentioned cambodia, uemurai and fruhstroferi.

29.07.2015 19:49, Leon Ortlieb:

What was there?
I encountered the same thing here, in the cherry. Also it looked interesting. I found it Yponomeuta evonymella, bird cherry mole was. Somewhere in the archives of the past years should be a photo of the gusennits. What have you been?

29.07.2015 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, but you know what in the Railway ecology))) Your sister's backyard three "great" include Musoroszhigateltny plant №4, Kuczynski landfill (aka Feninskaya dump) and veterinary-sanitary plant "Ecology" (thankfully closed 2- September 2014). Well, in my part of the city no less poison (((

29.07.2015 19:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The caterpillars then we immediately identified, but I'm not an expert to give an interview))))

29.07.2015 19:39, Peter Khramov:

"Biologists say."

29.07.2015 19:32, Leon Ortlieb:

I hope you saved the situation in your city? Come and identified tracks?

29.07.2015 19:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Incidentally, I do not believe in the industrial melanism. but it's a long time to write

29.07.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nicholas, my respect and thanks. Just wonderful geography filed. In the most literal sense: a brief and at the same time accurately. Keep it up )))

29.07.2015 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

29.07.2015 19:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What gal knows even my 12 year old daughter.
Then I remembered a specialist from my city
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcyvyX0OuVA

29.07.2015 19:13, Leon Ortlieb:

If you know what galls on the leaves, the cooler you are already candidates of science!

29.07.2015 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also it is possible that "up in the air" :)))
A good illustration (melanistic on the left): http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/1751
There's really no geography, but somehow sure it Hripan. She approx. 10 km. from my town in a straight line)))

29.07.2015 19:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A candidate I would also Pendel gave good)))

29.07.2015 19:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

You are trying to persuade me that I am an expert? Neighing!

29.07.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, also check this, please. Almost sure, but still I did not dare to exact))

29.07.2015 18:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

I just typed on a search engine: http://www.origins.org.ua/page.php?id_story=488
at the end.
I talked about this for a long time, someone from nauchnikov.

29.07.2015 18:29, Peter Khramov:

Collectors important collections. Skilled knowledge is important. Between them there are many intermediate forms.
Graduates, it is important knowledge, and thus he has a diploma in his specialty.
Proffesional specialization earns a living.

29.07.2015 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander daennye not from Wikipedia, and from books. Something other than Wikipedia, and have and read. And if I remember correctly (have not been there for a long time), even from the Darwin Museum in Moscow, which on the street. Vavilov d. 57 :)))
A solid organization, with more than a century of history: http://www.darwinmuseum.ru/_aboutus/?dir=history&more=century
I join the request of Peter. Interested, too.

29.07.2015 18:20, Peter Khramov:

Because of comments remove excess. If anyone believes that the removal of something of value to the general debate - is reported that.

29.07.2015 18:17, Leon Ortlieb:

Again I lost my koment.
Dmitry come anyway! Let lovers will appreciate the graduate spices.
I will tell the true story, and you will appreciate ..

Spring was Altyn Emel reserve. It was assigned to us in accordance with the order (2 and / machine) the guide, the candidate of biological sciences And ...When he began to show in the galls on the leaves and explain that in this way multiplies turanga, I could not resist and said turanga as all poplar propagated by seeds, cuttings, root suckers, but not so on the Gauls.Guides angry and said: "Where did you come from? I was born here, live all the time, and I know! And besides, you're dealing with a candidate of biological sciences .. What do you have settled for nonsense-Turanga poplar, willow and even family .." Etc.

The driver and his son, the dispute seemed funny.People for Education, having nothing to do with nature, came immediately to the Internet and installed :. Yes, Turanga poplar and willow family and so on. etc. Then he laughed, saying: "But ... Leon Soviet education, and you probably degree, and your master's more recent times ..."

Fans have access to the information for 5 seconds, in the car, in the desert.
Now imagine if the graduate will receive power and will force people to collect galls with leaves and seed to propagate the Red Turangi!
How do you like this graduate ??

29.07.2015 18:12, Peter Khramov:

Alexander and give the link to check out about the melanism where myths debunked.

29.07.2015 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Today, inspired by: the hour is notErebia wanga?

29.07.2015 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, industrial melanism, the same myth as the sun turns the head of a sunflower. Wikipedia article saw no need to give a link.
Here are just a few darker instance

29.07.2015 17:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander and I live here)))
And melanistic caught among other: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22271
Including the famous "industrial melanism"Biston betulariaalso catching all black (not exhibited copies. Killed in the trash).
Hence the suggestion.

29.07.2015 16:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Russia, South Republic of Buryatia - the species is quite good

29.07.2015 16:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leon Ortlieb! Then, determine that you have a specialist without a diploma and ask for such specialists by specialists with diplomas)))

29.07.2015 16:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander, sorry, confused link. From diletanta- layman reference picture)))
http://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Atalanta_31_0471-0492.pdf

29.07.2015 16:41, Leon Ortlieb:

The ark built amateurs, the Titanic experts ..
Dmitri, why did you decide that it is a shame when a person without a diploma called the expert? Do all dealt with a diploma? or tomorrow holders of diplomas sell ice cream?

The knowledge available, and many fans are classified sometimes broader or in a narrow sector is stronger than the owners of diplomas.Once upon a time, when the pictures to sell to publishers was interesting, I sold one publisher multivolume something like "Fish World", about a dozen photons.In an interview he said that he has available a number of authors amateur aquarists are highly specialized for a particular genus or family of fish, for example Piscary looking Old and photos from around the world, speak different languages, vacation conducted where the different types of Piscary found, collect info, photos, trying to breed and so forth.Write recommendations and so on. This sometimes does not work on the profile, and there teachers, state bureaucracy and so on. They know about the Piscary professionals with more than a diploma. Maybe a slightly different profile, but they are specialists. They write articles for books and some Ph.D. then edit the publication.

29.07.2015 16:37, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy . Thanks for the link. But stichophthalma to the coolant. there. They are very interested in Ch. imitata and P.plexaspes. If there is that about stichophthalma picture (sorry, an amateur), then throw off the link, pliz!

29.07.2015 16:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

No need to invent what is not. I mean the butterfly. The city does not know, he was not.

29.07.2015 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Until now, there are disputes on the taxonomy Ognevochnogo complex and can not even come to a consensus as it includes families. In the subfamily seems almost normal share, and poor families. You're looking at the site, then is there any finds similar images. but there are people who work with literature, determinants and atlases.So, in all Russian literature: The determinant of the European part of the USSR v.4. Part 5. 1985 Nephopterix hostilis (the originator of this subfamily Sinev) determinant ET v.5 ch.5.2005 (compiled Kirpichnikova VA) Nephopterix hostilis.Earlier there was a Russian school, and serious scientists or when not chasing innovations crusher and combiners, of which there are many, and have an opinion, based on the entire depth of the store of knowledge. And if Kirpichnikova determine how Nephopterix hostilis, then it is the position, and it will not change the label if someone in Europe has united several genera.Tomorrow still all be postponed. Phycitinae one of the most neglected groups ognevok, moreover, it is difficult to define. Yuri showed that this species in Russia is treated as Nephopterix hostilis. Sinev in its catalog, I made a series of systematic solutions for the new Russia, similar to Europe. Someone agreed completely, some partially.We have taken for the convenience of catalog basis. And now the curators lead taxa, at its discretion, based on the scientific work and not websites. The overall system can not be.

29.07.2015 16:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We must wait meticulous Irina)))

29.07.2015 15:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander! Why did you decide that I'm an expert? For me, this is also just a hobby, as well as for you. And in the jungle I'm probably not as much as you love to run and run))). Description I have given, that all saw how all sucked from the finger. A description of the subspecies called hard you stihopalm- is available in the public domain. http://www.landesmuseum.at/pdf_frei_remote/Atalanta_34_0075-0109.pdf But it is the same as this description.

29.07.2015 15:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No not like this
ssp. moscovitus Bryk & Eisner, 1938 - the C. European part (from Moscow, Tula, Vladimir, Ivanovo, Nizhniy Novgorod up to Volgograd);
ssp. democratus Krulikowsky, 1906 - the NE. European part (Kirov, Perm, Izhevsk, Vjatka, Elabuga, Yoshkar-Ola);

29.07.2015 15:37, Alexander Belousov:

ssp. democratus Krulikowsky, 1906 - the central European part

29.07.2015 15:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is likely that this is still melanism, industrial. My city is very dirty environmentally.

29.07.2015 15:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Kind is very variable, and such happen. Really very dark.

29.07.2015 14:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Melanism or normally is?

29.07.2015 14:48, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, Dmitri, your sarcasm is out of place. I'm no expert, but perhaps as recently someone named like me - "stamp collector." Passion butterflies childhood there, and then climb into the jungle do not want to study, and time too. I am one of those who need a hobby. Someone goes hunting, fishing, someone with rusty iron things busy, and I catch and collect butterflies.And beautiful butterflies, but not micro any. And I enjoy it.
A pussy boil or gene analysis done - not mine. Let these experts are engaged ... or those who like it. I - no, to each his own, I would rather run through the jungle.And as the site of "locked up" for the most part, in the amateurs, that's what you had describes aemon, and even from England and, since 80 percent or so, people are barely razlichat ksantomelas from polihloros. So I remembered an old anecdote.And about stihopalm so at Monastery and Devyatkina, there are also illustrations of the described species and subspecies, which I would like to see.

29.07.2015 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The inaccurate then let him pobudet until then :)

29.07.2015 14:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

29.07.2015 14:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

29.07.2015 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

29.07.2015 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you :)

29.07.2015 14:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

it

29.07.2015 14:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In vain perenes- is only a hypothesis!

29.07.2015 13:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, Alexander!

29.07.2015 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry and this check, please not yet slipped. Roughly this Eastern Sayan, env. pos. Mondy. Just label precise yet, but the orientation is correct 100%

29.07.2015 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callidrepana argenteola / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.07.2015 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callidrepana argenteola / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.07.2015 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, Sinev results for Russia 8 species of this genus, including 5 for 40 species of the region. :) No need screenshots, you need to go to the directory and select a random taxon and everything will be clear. :)
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/9887

29.07.2015 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celenna callopistes / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.07.2015 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celenna callopistes / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.07.2015 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pingasa ruginaria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2015 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pingasa ruginaria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2015 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, that would not have been many trials :) bring species as you determine. And I with your definition of where to put. Unified system does not and can not be. Just use one here, and another on another site, particularly for generic names.

29.07.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pingasa ruginaria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pingasa ruginaria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2015 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sinev 2008 Russia leads 4 species in the genus Sciota (Hulst, 1888). In the region of 40 2 ......
Here's a screen:

29.07.2015 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hours are as necessary to me to link a group if it is not linked to the author for some reason.

29.07.2015 10:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Interest Ask. :) Watch has repeatedly helped to resolve disputes on the species of butterfly in the photo on this site, when a butterfly images were not integrated into the group. But in my opinion it does not matter, especially for certain.

29.07.2015 10:07, Leon Ortlieb:

"What kinds of photos that exhibit full on the site?" It was clear to me. But without points on the map, perhaps, too little sense. It was understandable, with hope for the future ..
What date is realized, and for what hours?

29.07.2015 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leon, another question, what kinds of photos that exhibit full on the site? But the photos are exposed correctly. Therefore, it is desirable to expose the same pattern information with photos is planned to go to the card distribution and the summer species. so that the geography and data needed in the long term and to define or clarify the species.:) Do not be lazy, stamped data. :)

29.07.2015 9:46, Tatiana Selena:

No accidental shot, afraid to turn it!

29.07.2015 9:40, Leon Ortlieb:

Thank you Alexander! There is another question .. Why is it necessary to specify the time of shooting the common species here on the site where the mass? I am afraid that in addition to the moderator, this one does not pay attention ...
And a photo of ordinary species, few treats. Or am I wrong ??

29.07.2015 9:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Callidrepana argentiola my version

29.07.2015 8:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

29.07.2015 8:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

29.07.2015 8:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Celenna callopistes (Prout, 1932)

29.07.2015 8:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cook friend

29.07.2015 8:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Paramaxates spinivesica does not endemic to Borneo ???

29.07.2015 8:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Paramaxates spinivesica does not endemic to Borneo ???

29.07.2015 7:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil ! I take an interest, perhaps Japanese. Perhaps the absence to date of a single country classifications. Earlier, under this name Nephopterix hostilis Stph she went to work Sineva 1986; Kirpichnikova 1999, Yamanaka H. 1999. Under this name she is given in the book Kirpichnikova 2009 edition, which by the way, as the Zoological Institute entomologists have a desktop.
Ps.Basil! I've looked kind of Sciota. In Russia, only one kind of Sciota confluella Car. They wrote about it Caradja, 1916 and the blue, 2008: 160

29.07.2015 7:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yeah, Alexander! And description stihopalm)) looking for. They have me, but they need you? (They are on the same dialect obscure for you as an article on the new species of the genus Aemona)

29.07.2015 7:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And aces a subspecies of Apollo flies in Nizhny Novgorod?)))

29.07.2015 7:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

29.07.2015 5:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, do and do not need to be entered. View is another genus calledSciota hostilis(Stephens, 1834).

29.07.2015 5:01, Yuri Semejkin:

In this kind of directory site Nephopterix hostilis Stph missing. Yes, and very kind of 40 regions there.
It would be necessary to place, marked inaccurately defined.

29.07.2015 2:02, Peter Khramov:

And it would have to pass a small shtukovinku (cloth for catching insects). And I have something tasty in otvetochku ...

28.07.2015 23:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia seriatopunctata / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.07.2015 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now you can put down on their own time in their LC Alexander set out by the algorithm. It should succeed in this case.

28.07.2015 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leon, you do not correctly enter the date. It must be a year-month-day without the hyphen time hours: minutes: seconds.

28.07.2015 23:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2015-07-24 16:29:35.

28.07.2015 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2015-07-24 16:29:09.

28.07.2015 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2015-07-24 16:38:53.

28.07.2015 22:59, Leon Ortlieb:

24.07.2015 – 16:29:09

28.07.2015 22:57, Leon Ortlieb:

24.07.2015 – 16:29:35

28.07.2015 22:55, Leon Ortlieb:

24.07.2015 – 16:38:53

28.07.2015 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa mandarina / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.07.2015 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is mainly Malaysia uncertainty: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery?prec=8&author=93
It is necessary to finish, and then throw in another :)

28.07.2015 22:38, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you're out with. The head comes out there will understand.

28.07.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

No question, again. if you can not enter in the comments, I or any other moderator places a Picture. :)

28.07.2015 21:40, Leon Ortlieb:

In all three pictures, I copied a eksif data to the second and brought here. Where did they go no idea ..

28.07.2015 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, the time and date in principle not put?

28.07.2015 20:05, Daria Milkova:

Glad to help.

28.07.2015 19:25, Alex Dumchus:

And the day is also a good idea to Taya!

28.07.2015 19:24, Alex Dumchus:

Yeah. He remembered an old anecdote: "Dad, you're talking with someone today?"

28.07.2015 18:43, Alexander Belousov:

Sorry, I did not understand. I put a subspecies of aces - http://rusinsects.com/p-apol.htm. There just merzbacheri for North. Tien Shan and Dzungaria.

28.07.2015 17:30, Leon Ortlieb:

Daria, Nicholas, thank you. I found the answer. It Adonis leathery, or crown Campion (lat. Silēne coronāria). From the pink family. That you were close to the truth. Thank you!

28.07.2015 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe because the site is just the curve (apparently not engaged in one)?
For example: I do not open the main page Vol. 15 & 16. Found as a separate page and yuzayu.
Maybe the rest of the missing also scattered across the network?

28.07.2015 16:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There (on the site) is not three tomov- 2, 13, 17 (zygaenidae and two scoops of volume), as well as 11 and 12 is not fully laid out

28.07.2015 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not risked in the exact place and I want to ask for check)
Geography and then will correct date. Butterfly vykolki which yesterday posted here: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/40330 Share on trial.

28.07.2015 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, really happy for you, that is, in the hands of the book, what we see on the website of butterflies of Borneo, as I understand, only a fraction of the books.

28.07.2015 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A clear call to honor someone, just. Gottfried Merzbacher - the famous German geographer, cartographer and mountaineer (pedivikiya)

28.07.2015 14:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Since I have about 3000 neraspravlennyh Borneo lies and is already about 1,000, - I have nowhere to go. We'll have time to identify and seek out and cook (we have a long winter). Plus in February for the third time in Borneo food. Without the presence of books in the process of identifying transformed guesswork.

28.07.2015 14:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I do not know what there is now a subspecies. merzbacheri sort severotyanshansky, and your Dzhungaria some sort was. Although these Parnassus - I do not want to understand even in this philately

28.07.2015 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, come in handy :)

28.07.2015 14:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Need scans books in the series Moth of Thailand.

28.07.2015 14:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitri, the availability of books and identification on them various events, there may not be enough time, and without cooking, in some cases, not enough ..

28.07.2015 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, the question was why do you think that you have this subspecies. I myself have no idea what.
Dmitri, as a subspecies should be?

28.07.2015 13:59, Alexander Belousov:

I found someone to ask! I know how much in something? So we call!

28.07.2015 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

A top photo is?

28.07.2015 13:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And now we look and laugh
Aemona kontumei spec. nov.
Holotype d: Central Vietnam, Kon Turn Province, Ngoc Linh Nature Reserve, 1700 m, 2.IV. 1998 (ALM leg.).
Paratypes (6 cTcT, 2 $$): the same locality as the holotype, 1 $, 1700 m, 30.111.1998; 2 dd, 1600m, 3. and 6.IV.1998; September 1, 1450m, 20.IV.1998; 1 d, 1600m, 21.IV.1998; 1 d, 1500m, 6.V.1998 (all ALM leg.); 2 dd, Central Vietnam, Gia Lai Province, Kon Ka Kinh Nature Reserve, 1600 m, 19. and 20.IV.1999 (ALM leg.).
Holotype BMNH, paratypes MSU.
Description
Male
Generally large; forewing apex falcate and termen convex; hindwing conspicuously angled at vein 4 (M3).
85
Upperside. Ground colour not uniform: forewing brownish yellow at base, paler yellowish ochreous in the distal part; apex and termen narrowly dark brown, very contrasting; a fine dark streak at the end of the cell (upper part); discal line dark and contrasting, tending to be irregular, interrupted by veins and produced towards termen from both sides of at least veins 2 and 3. Hindwing ground colour brownish yellow (as in the basal part of the forewing); submarginal lunules dark outlined from both sides, filled with paler colour, merged and irregular in spaces 4-5 to 7, separate and gradually reduced towards tornus.
Underside. Ground colour rather dark, ochreous brown, paler in the postdiscal area, darker in the marginal zone; discal line narrowly bordered yellowish from the outside.Forewing with 5-6 brown-outlined ocelli, those in spaces 4-6 usually reduced to dots; those in space 2 and sometimes 1b filled with yellow (with white, in one specimen) and brown-centred. Hindwing with 6-7 brown-outlined ocelli, those in spaces 1c and 2 white-pupilled and those in spaces 4- 5 usually dot-like.
Length of forewing 35-44 mm.
Female
Upperside. Similar to the male in general characters, but larger; the contrast between the darker and paler areas more expressed.
Underside. Rather greyish compared to that of the male; spotting pattern the same.
Length of forewing 45-49 mm.
d'-genitalia
Uncus equal to tegumen or slightly shorter, leaf-like extended, blunt-ended (dorsal view) and sharply bent down (lateral view). Subunci long, straight, pointed and divergent. Clasp robust, its distal part ("foot") massive, about V3-V3.5 length of the clasp; end of the clasp ventrally with a variable number of spines (15-50), tending to be irregular. Juxta (lateral view) rhomb-shaped, with all angles acute, the basal process (connected with aedeagus) very long. Aedeagus as long as clasp, slender, evenly curved (lateral view), almost not extended towards the distal end (dorsal view), with a short patch of irregular spines on the left side.
9-genitalia
The structure of the female genitalia, especially that of the antevaginal area, is very complicated and seems to be rather similar in all the species studied. Of diagnostic importance is the shape and structure of the antevaginal plate proper, situated immediately before the ostium. In the case of A.kontumei, this plate is long, over 1 Vi times longer than wide, with short deep folds at the distal end (also incised at the middle in one specimen); the ventral surface covered with numerous irregular and laterally directed folds and wrinkles throughout.
Diagnosis and discussion
Since we are not prepared at the moment to provide a full revision of the genus Aemona Hewitson, [1868], we follow here the last published opinion of M. Nishimura (1999) and compare the newly described taxa with the butterflies flying in North Vietnam (originally described as A. amathusia tonkinensis Rothschild, 1916), which are treated by the lastauthoras belonging to the nominate subspecies of A. amathusia (Hewitson, 1868). The new species differs from the North Vietnamese A. amathusia in larger size, strongly falcate apex and convex termen of forewing, strongly two-coloured wing upperside, interrupted discal line, irregular shape of the submarginal lunules and details of the male genitalia (in A . amathusia, the uncus much longer than the tegumen, sharply pointed, the end of the clasp expanded with a sharply defined field of densely packed very small spines, juxta asymmetric, with a very short basal process, aedeagus shorter than clasp, slightly curved, broad and gradually extended to the distal end, with a long patch of irregular spines on a strongly sclerotized rib of the left side; jn the female genitalia, the antevaginal plate is very short, rounded and shallowly excavate, without folds or wrinkles
Aemona simulatrix spec. nov.
Holotype d: Central Vietnam, Gia Lai Province, Kon Ka Kinh Nature Reserve, 1400 m, 24.IV. 1999 (ALM leg.).Paratypes (4 dd, 1, 2): 1 d, the same locality as the holotype, 1200 m, 23.IV.1999; 2 dd, the same locality, the 1200 and 1300 m, 24.IV.1999 (ALM leg.); September 1, Gia Lai Province, Kon Cha Rang Nature Reserve, 1000 m, 11.111.1999; 1 d, the same locality, 900 m, 12.111.1999 (ALM leg.). Holotype BMNH, paratypes BMNH, MSU.
Description
Male (col. Pi. VII, figs. 1, 2).
Medium-sized; forewing apex not falcate and termen nearly straight.
Upperside. Ground colour of both wings uniformly ochreous; forewing apex and termen only slightly darker than the rest of the wing. Forewing: discal line dark and contrasting, tending to be irregular, interrupted and produced towards termen from both sides of at least veins 2 and 3. Flindwing submarginal lunules dark outlined from both sides, filled with ground colur or slightly paler, separate and subequal.
Underside. Ground colour more or less uniform, yellowish ochreous, including the marginal zone; discal line not bordered yellow; marginal lunules faint but conspicuous. Forewing with 2- 3 brown-outlined ocelli, those in spaces 1b and 3 very faint or absent, that in space 2 with a black-ringed white pupil. Hindwing with a full set of 6 ocelli, those in spaces 1c and 2 white- pupilled and black-ringed as on the forewing, those in spaces 3 to 7 filled with ground colour. Length of forewing 33-35 mm.
Female (col. Pi. VII, fig. 3)
Upperside. Very different from the male, the ground colour being uniformly greyish brown. Forewing discal line unbroken, very conspicuous, diffusely dark-shaded from the inner side; diffuse pale postdiscal patches in spaces 1b to 3.Hindwing discal line fine and unshaded; submarginal lunules conspicuous, paler than the ground colour, diffusely outlined with dark. Underside. Ground colour of both wings the same as on the upperside, slightly paler near bases and conspicuously paler in the postdiscal area up to the wing margin; faint traces of marginal lunules.
Forewing ocelli faint, that in space 2 larger and white-pupilled. Hindwing ocelli also faint, brown-outlined; that in space 2 filled with white.
Length of forewing 38 mm.
cT-genitalia (fig. 2, A-E)
In general, very similar to those of A. kontumei, but differing in the following characters: uncus slightly longer than tegumen, not so sharply bent down, its leaf-like part longer; subunci shorter, almost parellel; clasp slender, its "foot" smaller and shorter (about Vs length of clasp); the end of clasp with a more constant number of spines (about 25), arranged rather regularly; aedeagus and juxta similar to those of A. kontumei; aedeagus with only few small lateral spines (almost inconspicuous) in a single line.
9-genitalia (fig. 2, F)
Similar to those of the above species in general characters. Antevaginal plate short, slightly wider than long, excavate at the distal end, with a small number of faint, mostly longitudinal wrinkles.
Discussion
This new species differs sharply from A. kontumei, with which it flies sympatrically and syn- chronically in Kon Ka Kinh, in external features, being at the same time rather similar in male genitalia; from the North Vietnamese A. amathusia, to which it is more similar in appearance, it differs in the characters of the genitalia (see the diagnosis of A. kontumei).Aemona implicata spec. nov.
(colour plate VII, figs. 4-6)
Holotype d: North Vietnam, Bac Can Province, loc. Lung Vi, 21.IV.2001 (BXP leg.).
Paratypes (13 dd, 3 99): 9 dd, 2 99, the same locality as the holotype, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22.
IV.2001 (BXP leg.); 1 d, Central Vietnam, Ha Tinh Province, Vu Quang Nature Reserve, 1200 m, ZVIII.1997 (ALM leg.); September 1, the same locality, 1500 m, 3.IV.2000 (BXP leg.); 2 dd, the same locality, 1500 m, 8.IV.2000 (ALM leg.); 1 d, the same locality, 1500 m, 6.V.2000 (ALM leg.).
Description
Male (col. Pi. VII, figs. 5, 6)
Medium-sized; forewing apex not or slightly falcate; forewing termen slightly convex or nearly straight.
Upperside. Ground colour of both wings uniform yellowish ochreous. Forewing: apex and termen narrowly and diffusely brown, not very contrasting with the rest of the wing; discal line faint but conspicuous, unbroken. Hindwing: discal line as on the forewing; submarginal lunules faintly outlined from the inner side, large and subequal, as in A. amathusia tonkinensis, becoming almost inconspicuous towards tornus.
Underside. Ground colour of both wings more or less uniform, yellowish ochreous, slightly paler in the postdiscal area; discal line brown, not bordered yellow; marginal lunules faint but conspicuous. Forewing ocelli basically visible only in spaces 1b and 2, filled with whitish or ground colour. Hindwing with a full set of 6 ocelli, those in spaces 3 and 4 may be dot-like; those in spaces 1c and 2 filled with whitish.However, in one male from Vu Quang, collected in August, ocelli in space 2 of the forewing and in spaces 1c and 2 of the hindwing have black- ringed white pupils, this character making it practically indistinguishable from A. amathusia tonkinensis.
Length of forewing 36-38.5 mm.
Female (col. Pi. VII, fig. 4)
Larger and darker than the male, forewing apex more conspicuously falcate and termen more convex.
Upperside. Ground colour of both wings more brownish than in the male. Forewing rather contrasting, being darker in the basal and discal areas and much paler in the postdiscal zone and above vein 3 to costa; dark brown coloration at the apex and along termen extended compared to the male. Hindwing of the same ground colour, slightly paler in the postdiscal area near costa, where two upper submarginal lunules are bordered by dark colour; other lunules
inconspicuous.
Underside. Ground colour of both wings greyish brown, conspicuously paler in the postdiscal area. Forewing with a set of 5 ocelli, those in spaces 1b and 2 filled with whitish, the others dot-like. Hindwing with six ocelli, those in spaces 1c, 2 and 6 filled with whitish.
Length of forewing 42 mm.
d'-genitalia (fig. 3, A-E).
Uncus much longer than tegumen, rather sharply bent down, its distal part leaf-like extended in dorsal view (although not so strongly as in A. kontumei and A. simulatrix), both parts being equal in length, with a sharply pointed and curved down tip. Subunci relatively short, almost straight but slightly curved upwards and pointed at the ends, conspicuously divergent.Distal part of clasp slender, looking somewhat three-edged in dorsal view; its distal part ("foot") short, about 1/6 length of clasp, rounded at the end, with a sharply angled dorsal projection; a narrow field of densely packed small spines is situated on the very tip of the clasp. Juxta short, dorsally rather rounded (lateral view), with its basal process (connected to the aedeagus) short. Aedeagus shorter than clasp, faintly curved, evenly extended (dorsal view) towards the distal end, with a narrow patch of irregular small spines on the left side.
9-genitalia (fig. 3, F)
Antevaginal plate shorter than wide, gradually tapered to the distal side, which is broadly V-wise excavate or almost straight; its central part looks almost rectangular, with 1 or 2 straight central folds and a number of oblique lateral folds extending to its base.
Diagnosis and discussion
Soth sexes of the new species are hardly distinguishable from A. amathusia tonkinensis by external features. However, the male genitalia show marked differences from the latter in the shape of the uncus and the distal part of the clasp and in the arrangement of spines on the latter. The antevaginal plate of the female is also very different from those of all species studied. The distribution areas of the new species and A. amathusia tonkinensis seem to overlap widely in North and Central Vietnam (Ke bang in Quang Binh Province is the southernmost record of A. amathusia tonkinensis), both occurring sympatrically and synchronically in the Ba Be-Na Hang area (Lung Vi and Lung Li localities).The single male collected in August and differing in the underside characters may be suspected to represent the second generation (wet season form) of the new species.
In general find three differences)))

28.07.2015 13:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Judging by sostoyaniyu- wintered specimen - means spring, April-early May

28.07.2015 13:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Clearly, I thought again, which drove off

28.07.2015 12:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stihopalmy it a lot)))

28.07.2015 12:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Dmitriy! It is in the Kaluga region, with their grandchildren in the country. Houses will be 20 days of August. Then, apparently, and see the butterflies.

28.07.2015 11:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well, when, Irina, you'll show us all with DV

28.07.2015 11:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

why merzbacheri ???

28.07.2015 11:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female

28.07.2015 10:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In Malaysia, especially in Borneo - all straightened out with it boldly. I got hold of all the volumes Moth of Borneo, including 13 2, 17 (of which there are no network) and the complete 11 and 12 (in the network, they are neutered)

28.07.2015 8:59, Alexander Belousov:

The female laid an egg directly on the "dad"

28.07.2015 8:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, you noticed a chronic "disease" - not to the date and time of shooting.
This is the desired data. Therefore, please correct :)

28.07.2015 7:43, Daria Milkova:

Yes, they had a lot yesterday and different. I just thought that the gamma of the shape of the spot on the front wing

28.07.2015 7:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

You there are many kinds of Autographa, you need to watch very carefully. :) Maybe gamma.

28.07.2015 7:26, Daria Milkova:

Autographa gamma?

28.07.2015 7:10, Daria Milkova:

She quickly flew away, I could not remove it from all angles :(

27.07.2015 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cucullia sp. view only guess. :(

27.07.2015 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polychrysia esmeralda / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.07.2015 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra perflua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.07.2015 16:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, I do not mind. The Japanese, too, think it is not a first-grader. All wrong. It is best to double-check

27.07.2015 16:13, Peter Khramov:

I took into account all the views will still be questions - ask in this topic further.

27.07.2015 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Simply S. Didenko is sdi with molbiola man who also knows the theme of "Hurrah." That's why I asked)))

27.07.2015 15:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Japanese one friend. Collector katokal

27.07.2015 15:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who approves and where?

27.07.2015 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Claim This armandi, instead Catocala deuteronympha

27.07.2015 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Both fly only in the way: he caught :)
They are like all kryglosutochnye)

27.07.2015 13:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

C. sponsa; C. promissa born not fly

27.07.2015 13:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Covenant we flying from late July to mid-August. I can not say much, but 5 pieces collected earlier in the season on the screen every year.

27.07.2015 11:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For the winter ))
There are many more okromya this (Malaysia) is not enough for one year :)
Unfortunately the material is not defined or the same without geography: it's all too brakes ((

27.07.2015 11:25, Peter Khramov:

This information is sufficient, if the species of interest. A new infu then dokinut can.
What it is impossible to look the other bell tower - bad.

27.07.2015 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, do not get to watch the other bell tower when stalkivaaeshsya with nepoymi-a soprovodilovka or when it does not.
Daria generally correctly written: for me it is a great repekt :))) The only thing I want to add that these conditions must relate to absolutely all photos, not only of uncertainty.At most there is a certain number of material that has not yet spread due to lack of data (
For example, here are the contents of the box are not spread only because I know at least: it is collection of 2013's most south of Buryatia (near the border with Mongolia) . These data are insufficient: over time, will be detailed label (I know personally the one who collected) and then start.

27.07.2015 10:51, Peter Khramov:

People just try to look at things from a different steeple. At least from the next.

27.07.2015 10:18, Daria Milkova:

I think if you upload photos of butterflies and want it kind of defined, kindly indicate the shooting and geography, to facilitate the work of professionals. In the end, this is a serious site, and those who play hide and seek, to do it in social networks. Here, no one wondering where you are and what you're doing there.

27.07.2015 10:06, Tatiana Selena:

I see. Thanks!

27.07.2015 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also the "girl")) mustache seen)

27.07.2015 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

27.07.2015 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Covenant he would like to find and collect, we have, as yet not caught ((
Previously I collected at home, right in the 5 types of train:
C. fulminea; C. nupta; C. sponsa; C. promissa; C. fraxini
This summer some strange with a minus sign (
But let us hope for the best))

27.07.2015 9:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Incidentally July 24 came the first NUFT. We look forward to the Covenant.

27.07.2015 8:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This year, first came to the kroon trap 28 June. On the first caught on July 8.

27.07.2015 7:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Clearly, you can not shoot, and here not to throw.

27.07.2015 6:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

In this race all types are very similar to each other and need to know very well the local fauna, which would suggest that in the view of. By pterophoridae have a large number of births, which identify a photograph is almost impossible. It helps plant sometimes catching a butterfly. and it is not always. determined only by drugs genitals.

27.07.2015 6:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

There would also be a subspecies paste :) On Sakhalin, only one subspecies. :)

27.07.2015 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Tatiana) All right.

27.07.2015 5:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is normal on a personal level.
But in this case, and you should not upload photos: undated and geography (though, would be abbreviated).
It will be a photo that does not carry any meaning, but to just a picture.
Let no one be offended - this is the reality: these data are often simply necessary for the normal operation with the site.

27.07.2015 2:31, Peter Khramov:

There are cases where people do not want to specify exactly when and where they are. This is normal. Although the content and bad.

27.07.2015 0:53, Tatiana Selena:

It seems only fit correctly or not! I do not know much until the site!

27.07.2015 0:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Taken on a building wall. Wingspan somewhere along the 1 cm on each side.
Alexander! Explain what you mean. Pterophoridae general pictures can not be determined by the angle or wrong? How then to remove them?

27.07.2015 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first representative Catocala this season.
This kind of our personal observations of the most "early" in the family and in a favorable year it should appear to be more a fortnight ago ...
Everything in nature has moved this season ((

26.07.2015 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.07.2015 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.07.2015 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.07.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I can not understand why hide date. It's naiserёzneyshaya, key information. I do not take in sense: it's website claims to seriousness or "funny pictures", of which there are in the network and so completely?
I wondered the right: what sort of "super secret data" ....in the date of the shooting? Kindergarten, and only (((
Alexander and EXIF ​​for example would be very useful in cases such as today: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41741
There, as an example I gave here this EXIF ​​your photo (shot the day after the capture): http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40198
And geography there - my home balcony.So that someone who, as I have nothing to hide, and just do not see any sense))) God grant that, and everyone is the same view was.
:

26.07.2015 22:32, Fedor Ovechkin:

Those who do not want to put an exact date can remove themselves from a file data EXIF ​​(it's just done), but each time to manually fill date - annoying. For those who want to put an exact date to be an advantage over those who conceal this date.

26.07.2015 22:19, Peter Khramov:

You can put in the corresponding columns of machine data from EXIF. Suits - people leave, not suitable - removes. But it's about time / date. With geography does not help much. And ZhPSov little, and coordinates these not so easy to read people.

26.07.2015 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Then I think of that does not help.

26.07.2015 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pheosia tremula / Confidently identified / Daria Milkova.

26.07.2015 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pheosia tremula / Confidently identified / Daria Milkova.

26.07.2015 21:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pheosia tremula / Confidently identified / Daria Milkova.

26.07.2015 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

And if your camera is incorrect time? And if I do not want to put an exact date, lot: what if.
We have a bunch of photos without any dates, and geography. When we teach people to fill those columns, and EXIF ​​then be required. And now it is unnecessary confusion.

26.07.2015 21:37, Daria Milkova:

Pheosia tremula?

26.07.2015 20:51, Peter Khramov:

All right.

26.07.2015 20:26, Nikolay Grebennikov:

The wingspan is needed and in what substrate photographed?

26.07.2015 19:33, Peter Khramov:

To test ZHPS need to be a thread of a file, where the data are available. Does anyone have a thread at hand? It is no butterflies: -)

26.07.2015 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time and date are required for shooting pictures of nature.
For the collection of shooting time is not important, and important, only the date of capture.
These two conditions are necessary, but the self-ZHPS an optionally: even now he is not at all.
I'm so seen this picture.
Regarding EXIF ​​propose to do something like this: http://parovoz.com/newgallery/pg_view.php? ID = 525866 & LNG = RU # picture
There is a button which is accessible to all (even guests), and not just modders. Zhmakni on it and you will understand everything))

26.07.2015 18:31, Peter Khramov:

Messrs curators base taxa until the editing, now there is a synchronization of two databases. How to end this thing - I will inform you further.
Messrs users, keep in mind that during the synchronization curators fail to fulfill your requests to add / change in the position of taxa in the tree.

26.07.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Astraptes fulgerator / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

26.07.2015 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antigonus erosus / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

26.07.2015 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I presume the author's comments.

26.07.2015 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Astraptes fulgerator / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

26.07.2015 17:50, Peter Khramov:

In addition to the date / time and geography (if the GPS was) what further information is required? In fact, perhaps we could also survey data in case of desire to discuss the particular photograph.

26.07.2015 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.07.2015 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.07.2015 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.07.2015 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I approve. Particularly paragraphs 2 and 3)))
Peter, still a moderator's question. A little bit out of topic, but take this opportunity)
It is impossible, whether to make modernizing seen EXIF ​​loaded Photo?
It will only benefit the business. Sometimes EXIF ​​oh-how needed to justify action moderator)
Think about it. If you have those. the possibility, of course))

26.07.2015 16:51, Daria Milkova:

:-) Check up

26.07.2015 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's my pleasure :))
And as the clock displayed kalendarё also check the camera settings just in case)))

26.07.2015 16:46, Daria Milkova:

Basil I about the elementary things had not even thought, thank you!

26.07.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Titaea lemoulti / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.07.2015 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Titaea lemoulti / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.07.2015 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Daria, if the digital camera (and I'm almost sure of it): in this case, I recommend shooting time to affix the photo from EXIF, and not the eye (you even date, which struck the camera is not the same as the above).It is necessary to right-click the file, then properties, then on the tab "Details" (this is for Windows 7 and for Win XP, the same option in the properties file called "Summary" . And to see the exact time of shooting, which must be specified.
It should look like in "Seven" (time allotted)

This is in order not to have any such doubts, and related matters.

26.07.2015 15:08, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Dianthus deltoides.

26.07.2015 14:57, Daria Milkova:

I keep forgetting to remove it. But I'll try!

26.07.2015 14:53, Peter Khramov:

Daria, if you can, ship, please take a photo without the image implanted in date.

26.07.2015 14:50, Daria Milkova:

We called it the wild cloves, but as scientifically - I do not know.

26.07.2015 14:47, Daria Milkova:

Thank you, and I think, believe it or not ...

26.07.2015 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calyptra thalictri / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2015 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calyptra thalictri / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2015 14:45, Leon Ortlieb:

Does anyone know the name and the plant?

26.07.2015 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Urania leilus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.07.2015 14:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Carige cruciplaga.

26.07.2015 14:26, Yuri Semejkin:

And here is a link to the image itself on Google. http://mushinavi.com/navi-insect/data-ga_namisyaku_togari_hosisuji.htm
P. Only one option

26.07.2015 14:23, Peter Khramov:

Small improvements in the interface:
1. In the editing your photos uploaded to LC, you can search not only by number photos on the site, but also on the name of the file as it was called on to your computer before downloading (or any part of the name of the file).
2.Time for editing titles in the form image, as well as its removal increased from one to three hours.
3. Time edit comments of half an hour, but if after you have not had the comments of other users, then edit your new comment can not for a half hour and one hour.

26.07.2015 14:12, Alex Dumchus:

Citheronia sp...

26.07.2015 14:09, Alex Dumchus:

Urania leilus

26.07.2015 14:08, Alex Dumchus:

Same 41786. Titaea lemoulti

26.07.2015 14:05, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris sp. View to the rear or even a size

26.07.2015 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

About this butterfly such horrors tell, but I do not know where his feet are, we have this common species, or when not been convicted of vampire tendencies.

26.07.2015 14:01, Alex Dumchus:

Titaea lemoulti ?

26.07.2015 13:14, Yuri Semejkin:

There is. Only brief infa Carige cruciplaga (Walker, 1861) (C. duplicaria nigronotata Bremer: Bidzilya, Klyuchko, 1994: 22;
And here is the link itself http://www.libed.ru/knigi-nauka/389973-14-russian-academy-sciences-far-eastern-branch-institute-biology-and-soil-science-lazovsky-state-nature-reser.php

26.07.2015 13:01, Daria Milkova:

This question is not whether it is a butterfly-vampire found in Siberia? The Internet flashed infa.

26.07.2015 12:55, Yuri Semejkin:

It is located in an Internet text. There it is mentioned that in the Primorye Territory is there are in the surroundings. d. Glazkovka. I look for more, if I can find a link throw.

26.07.2015 12:55, Daria Milkova:

I realized! I introduced a number with # and had no.

26.07.2015 12:53, Daria Milkova:

I do not know why, but again I could not combine photos. I have made several attempts. This one is a butterfly, # 41748 and # 41747

26.07.2015 12:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Carige cruciplaga (catalog no) Here is the link

26.07.2015 12:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you.

26.07.2015 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calyptra thalictri / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2015 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calyptra thalictri / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2015 12:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Daria, join the group, and I'll see what kind of :)

26.07.2015 12:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Very fine. The length of 3-5 mm

26.07.2015 12:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

There's even a family to determine the problem. Although the dimensions are approximate.

26.07.2015 11:36, Daria Milkova:

You know, I was then still sat these butterflies, up to 4 on the hand and on the clothes again. So I can make a mistake. But these pictures were in a row, and in my opinion, it's a butterfly. The rest of the photos (I have a lot of them) you made popozzhe.No experts, and if you have any doubt that this is one butterfly, perhaps this is true ...

26.07.2015 11:33, Daria Milkova: This species is identified correctly.

26.07.2015 11:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I'm as smart as you are :))) I for this time, and made one appearance. But it's our you, the assumptions that are not true. Truth knows Daria, she and time stamped. Which is subjective, that is, not with the negative, and by eye. So, there is a chance that the butterfly different :)

26.07.2015 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Responsible for Daria))
Date and time of all the photos one: 2015-07-23 11:00:00
That means the same)

26.07.2015 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

The most important question, it's really a butterfly? :)))

26.07.2015 10:56, Daria Milkova:

I pressed the button. But apparently that is not passed. Anyway, thank you for the information!

26.07.2015 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It should then press the bottom of the page "Refresh data and delete the marked images"
It goes without anything to mark the removal is not necessary. It's just common button.
Groups better knit adding pictures one by one. Assign two already existing groups into one fail.

26.07.2015 10:35, Daria Milkova:

Basil, I'm just starting. But in fact, I seem to be introduced in the rooms of the same individual, I do not know why they are not united. Or you need something else to do?

26.07.2015 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria mathura / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2015 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria mathura / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2015 10:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not bad, would write a subspecies in the top line))
Tatiana, it can only make you.
Please in my LC. It should look like this: ssp. sachalinensis Matsumura, 1927

26.07.2015 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Daria, to learn, please communicate in groups.
My job as the moderator is not to bind the group for all users, and to identify correct errors already connected.
This group I have only come together at first, and then stop. Learn to do it yourself.If you need help, we will explain everything and tell.
Especially since you obviously know better what pictures in this group should be.)

26.07.2015 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41742 group.

26.07.2015 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41741 group.

26.07.2015 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41740 group.

26.07.2015 9:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sakhalin subspecies P. p. sachalinensis Matsumura, 1927.
http://www-sbras.nsc.ru/win/elbib/atlas/Arctiidae/81.html

26.07.2015 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's a butterfly on his finger, merely Daria can not bind the group. :)

26.07.2015 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia aethiops / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

26.07.2015 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia aethiops / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

26.07.2015 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caterpillar last 41570 years, and far more young 31286 :) there is no past ages with a large head. The structure ornaments caterpillars like.

26.07.2015 9:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, this genus is highly developed sexual dimorphism, males and females do not look at each other and females can be twice larger than males. In this species the female with pink lower wings, the males with yellow and darker front.

26.07.2015 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.07.2015 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.07.2015 9:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.07.2015 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.07.2015 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.07.2015 9:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.07.2015 9:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.07.2015 9:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.07.2015 8:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia aethiops / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

26.07.2015 8:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia aethiops / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

26.07.2015 8:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.07.2015 8:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2015 8:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2015 8:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Alexander! Who is correct.

26.07.2015 8:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Will female. :)

26.07.2015 8:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, the author's comments are not correct. An instance is not yet displayed and is to come, may come, but can not. Correctly pointed collecting caterpillars pupate and date. :))

26.07.2015 8:23, Alexander Belousov:

Erebia aethiops

26.07.2015 8:22, Alexander Belousov:

Erebia aethiops

26.07.2015 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Acronicta connecta ?

26.07.2015 6:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Daria, you can connect your own photos of the same individuals in the group in his LC. Get to know and I will correct if that))

26.07.2015 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41738 group.

26.07.2015 6:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41737 group.

26.07.2015 6:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala fulminea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.07.2015 6:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.07.2015 6:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.07.2015 6:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.07.2015 5:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ourapteryx sambucaria / Tatiana Selena Tristrophis veneris / Yuri Semejkin.

26.07.2015 5:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The only species of the genus)
Subspecies likely form or another
And just changeable in itself it is in color.

26.07.2015 4:18, Yuri Semejkin:

She is not. It Tristrophis veneris (Butler, 1878)

26.07.2015 2:57, Yuri Semejkin:

In the extended position the length of not less than 7 cm, and therefore did not relate to pink neparniku http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41695
Biology clearly does not fit with the others. The tracks available on the site.

26.07.2015 2:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! Something I have serious doubts that this pink neparnik? Here, as in the previous butterfly http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41574 body yellow with black legs and yellow strokes. Maybe males and must then confirm.
But the point is, in general, not even in this. Alexander ! If not hard, it compares the two tracks and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41570 http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31286. Both lifted before pupation.I would say that they are different sizes, and they are small.
In this species, which is a picture caterpillars are the 3rd option. Different both in appearance and large size.
The length of the tracks is not less than 7 cm, bigger than a matchbox.
In this individual, I did not fully deploy the house was limited to shooting other tracks. Specimens. Therefore we have to throw apart.

26.07.2015 2:09, Yuri Semejkin:

A Lymantria mathura it? Like everywhere, from pink neparnika pink paws. Here we see the gray. Can anyone say why such a difference in color?
The site is with yellow paws, about them at say.

26.07.2015 1:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Let

26.07.2015 0:34, Tatiana Selena:

Similar but slightly different, there is the edge of her fringe yellow and black, and there are two peas are clearly visible on the edges of the wings at the bottom and then on another.

25.07.2015 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.07.2015 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2015 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thecla betulae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.07.2015 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.07.2015 23:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.07.2015 23:11, Leon Ortlieb:

One admiral his underwear collection in lingerie ..

25.07.2015 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, this type of site it is, just that he is in a sort Hypsopygia. Suppose there is worth it.

25.07.2015 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Hypsopygia placens / Yuri Semejkin.

25.07.2015 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2015 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2015 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Niphonyx segregata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2015 21:25, Peter Khramov:

That's for sure.

25.07.2015 21:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sinocharis korbae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2015 20:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

If no sites, then look books, always superfluous. :)

25.07.2015 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

The subspecies japonica Menetries, 1857.

25.07.2015 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis camilla / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

25.07.2015 19:43, Peter Khramov:

Citizens! Please! Wherever you post some text infu (comments, information about the forms, captions fotam etc.), write as fully as possible, and reducing use only the most obvious. It is necessary for a more adequate translation of information into other languages, we are now in a strong start to sculpt a greater extent than before.Part of machine translation is used, and for him like this, for example, the phrase: "Amura., Hub., Approx. edge. Japan, Korea Peninsula, SW and China ", to put it mildly, is not entirely clear. Let's not be lazy, and (if possible) to write "The Amur Region, Khabarovsk and Primorsky Krai, Japan, Korea, Northeast and North China."This will make our site more comfortable for non-Russian-speaking users.

25.07.2015 19:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Anna Gerasimova Not identified.

25.07.2015 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

On this photo at all or that it is impossible to determine :( Oleg Baking, usually cautious in their definitions. I guess I do not see it. :(

25.07.2015 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria mathura / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2015 18:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia lucifuga / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.07.2015 18:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Jury to determine that it may not give, only added to the gallery freak. :(

25.07.2015 18:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia lucifuga / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.07.2015 18:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parasemia plantaginis / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.07.2015 18:42, Shamil Murtazin:

similar, but Sakhalin yet ...

25.07.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill another reason why it is not Hyles.
Revelers, as far as I know always pupate in the litter, moss, a piece of wood and stones in the ground.
I do not know of such a hawk whose pupae attached to the leaves, etc. )))
And this baby doll from memory the same as my light-brown Cucullia lucifuga was.

25.07.2015 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

25.07.2015 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

25.07.2015 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

25.07.2015 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, do not hawk moth. It is likely scoop:Cucullia lucifuga.
See site should be this picture: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/16330
Conclusion I did a long time ago and the memory goose was so well-)))
Wrap not undertake: let someone else would look (caterpillar self-other).

25.07.2015 16:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Somehow, the wings are not murdered, but a doll was in limbo, that is, all conditions for the unfolding were.
He threw for determination. Hyles what?

25.07.2015 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

FemaleParasemia plantaginisthis?

25.07.2015 12:59, Peter Khramov:

It would be nice this weekend or Monday / vtorink in Moscow. If there is someone - write / call. http://lepidoptera.ru/contacts

25.07.2015 12:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Lymantria grisescens ( Staudinger, 1887 ) ?

25.07.2015 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only vague. According to leave no separate gallery.

25.07.2015 10:48, Peter Khramov:

Transferred?

24.07.2015 21:21, Peter Khramov:

Not ... not about the Ministry of Defense.

24.07.2015 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Most of the past: if about MO))
We have only 2 types of Limenitis: and thisLimenitis populi. Do not confuse)) In contrast to the Far East ....

24.07.2015 20:47, Peter Khramov:

Joke has not passed ...

24.07.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe someone on the sites and watch, but Camilla I do not need this)
Was-would MO - without question, would be a long time Camilla was)))
And then we have to wait to touch the clarification.
Lentochnikov actually the surest distinguished by the underside, whose pridviditsya not, alas (((

24.07.2015 18:20, Alex Dumchus:

Well, yes, I write with a tablet, it was reluctant to move Inglish. As far as I am aware, there are 6 subspecies described, and type - stihopalma Devyatkino.

24.07.2015 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Stihopalmy!

24.07.2015 17:25, Peter Khramov:

Judging by the presence of link turns out that all kinds of sites do need to look ...

24.07.2015 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I bet, too, Camilla http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26756
And all sorts of sites I do not need to look: the good of the species in their native Moscow flies in abundance: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/37-rhop/nymphalidae/149-limenitis-camilla))

24.07.2015 16:40, Alex Dumchus:

Here is where to take these descriptions, I especially would be interesting stihopalmy?

24.07.2015 16:38, Yuri Semejkin:

I would say that this Limenitis camilla, some fly. Everyone seems to bother no white vertical bars on the front wings .. But it is not always the case, especially in the fly. Look here http://www.eurobutterflies.com/sp/camilla.php

24.07.2015 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

NotLimenitis amphyssaway of habit. It is worth it in my collection: completely different.
We have to wait people are summarized in this issue.
"East (especially Far) - a delicate matter" :)

24.07.2015 15:31, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Limenitis amphyssa.

24.07.2015 15:09, Peter Khramov:

The inaccurate?

24.07.2015 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia dracunculi / Tentatively identified / Shamil Murtazin.

24.07.2015 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypena brevicella / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 13:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypena brevicella / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 13:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Barbourion lemaii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 13:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Barbourion lemaii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Psilogramma menephron / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Psilogramma menephron / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 13:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Theretra indistincta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 13:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Theretra indistincta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 13:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Female Hypena brevicella

24.07.2015 13:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Congratulations! Barbourion lemaii (Le Moult, 1933)

24.07.2015 13:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Psilogramma menephron (Cramer, 1780)

24.07.2015 13:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Theretra indistincta (Butler, 1877)

24.07.2015 12:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Megaspilates mundataria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.07.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Potanthus ganda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Potanthus ganda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Potanthus ganda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Potanthus ganda ganda (Fruhstorfer, 1911), well, that can be seen all the wings and bottom.

24.07.2015 10:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea hewitsonii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea hewitsonii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea hewitsonii - C. & R. Felder, 1865

24.07.2015 10:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enispe duranius / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enispe duranius / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euripus robustus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euripus robustus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Vindula dejone / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

24.07.2015 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Vindula dejone / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

24.07.2015 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gnathothlibus erotus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gnathothlibus erotus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enispe cycnus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enispe cycnus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.07.2015 9:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Enispe duranius Fruhstorfer,1911

24.07.2015 9:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euripus robustus Wallace, 1869

24.07.2015 9:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

dejone male

24.07.2015 9:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Gnathothlibus erotus (Cramer, 1777)

24.07.2015 9:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Earlier I said that it Aemona amathusia, but now- I do not know, because I did not see the descriptions Monastery and Devyatkina 3 new species from Vietnam

24.07.2015 9:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Enispe cycnus cycnus Westwood,[1851]

23.07.2015 22:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Cucullia dracunculi, definition photo, inaccurate, Oleg Baking, molbiol.

23.07.2015 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Buzara feneratrix / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.07.2015 15:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Buzara feneratrix

23.07.2015 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lophophelma luteipes / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.07.2015 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas intervacuata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.07.2015 14:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lophophelma luteipes

23.07.2015 14:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Damn, there is a Abraxas intervacuata. I hesitate to pose initially)))

23.07.2015 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acropentias aurea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.07.2015 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acropentias aurea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.07.2015 14:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zanclognatha lunalis / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.07.2015 14:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Zanclognatha lunalis. Matov confirmed the correctness of the definition.

23.07.2015 4:49, Yuri Semejkin:

No group is not defined by genitalia - Kirpichnikova VA Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS.

22.07.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lemonia dumi / Confidently identified / Male / Gleba Basil.

22.07.2015 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

22.07.2015 19:16, Alexander Belousov:

Issoria lathonia

22.07.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hipparchia autonoe / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.07.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudochazara hippolyte / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.07.2015 18:45, Alexander Belousov: This species is identified correctly.

22.07.2015 18:44, Alexander Belousov: This species is identified correctly.

22.07.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterostoma palpina / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

22.07.2015 17:32, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you for your participation, but how to bring up and bring to the adult stage, I know. I have a specific case - Apollo. With him I was not the case. Here advice is needed for the storage of masonry today. In winter, it is clear - a refrigerator, and now what? Leave the room, on the street? There is +38 ° + 44 °, houses + 31 °. The biotope dispersion of heat per day from day 35 ° to 3 ° at night.

22.07.2015 14:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Oh Alexander and volumes at you though. With regard to release into the wild, and their preservation in the future. I released his flock in the same "youth", not all will survive of course, you are right.

22.07.2015 11:44, Alex Dumchus:

But it is in vain - to produce in nature. This year I released a hundred pieces of Saturnia piri second abrikosu- age on up, no not lived up to the third age, ate spiders and ants. A 12-14 left in the cage, 3 pupated safely.

22.07.2015 7:13, Yuri Semejkin:

The site she Aphomia zelleri (Joannis, 1932)

22.07.2015 7:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! Tell us about your case, and then decide. I took a sheet once and only kirkazona home found him laying on altsinoya. I had to grow up. In general, he took the plastic cup from under 0.5 liters of kvass. I splashed a bit of water there.Then take a piece of cellophane package, I made a hole in it to pass the sheet on which a cutting masonry, lowered gently into the cup, so cutting the sheet into contact with the water and everything. Liszt constantly fresh and newborn caterpillars is very fresh. This is when you can grow food changed every 2-3 days.The bag in the cup should fit snugly against the wall to eliminate the fall of the future of small larvae into the water. In general, I have all been born, all the tracks have been preserved, and after some time released into the wild on their host plants. Here such I had the experience of growing.
I hope somehow sorientirueshsya yet, and before you know, and others.people would vote, could be more specific. Good luck !!!

22.07.2015 6:37, Alexander Belousov:

Friends help advice or send to those who help! :-) Demolished femaleParnassius apollossp. merzbacheri. What to do with eggs. How to store. Week hanging in the cage can be dried up? How to determine the "viability" of the material? I would be grateful for any help. I'd like to go all the way to development.

22.07.2015 6:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Orthopygia placens Btl. The taxonomic scope and boundaries of the genus Orthopygia are still debatable. G.Hempson (Hampson, 1896) considered a junior synonym name Orthopygia Herculia, modern authors (Martin, 1986), on the contrary, saw the name as a synonym Herculiua Orthopygia. In this paper, the author takes Orthopygia and Herculia as 2 separate genus, which differ genitive structure. and painting the wings.-2 Form.

22.07.2015 5:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Melissoblaptes zelleri

21.07.2015 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Tanaecia jahnu / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.07.2015 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Tanaecia jahnu / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.07.2015 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aoa affinis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.07.2015 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aoa affinis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.07.2015 18:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The underside is not still

21.07.2015 18:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female Tanaecia jahnu (Moore, [1858])

21.07.2015 18:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

endemic to Sulawesi Aoa affinis (Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1865)

21.07.2015 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha pamphilus / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

21.07.2015 13:22, Fyodor Pudovikov:

he is

21.07.2015 10:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you, Eugene!
Hmm, no pictures in the determinant of this kind =)

21.07.2015 6:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Acropentias aurea

21.07.2015 6:47, Yuri Semejkin:

You can transfer. Kirpichnikova confirmed the correctness of the definition.

21.07.2015 1:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Only this handsome, because male))))

20.07.2015 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tongeia fischeri / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

20.07.2015 23:45, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Clossiana sp.

20.07.2015 23:44, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Tongeia fischeri

20.07.2015 22:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Hipparchia autonoe?

20.07.2015 22:42, Shamil Murtazin:

This is a mystery to me ...

20.07.2015 22:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Pseudochazara hippolyte?

20.07.2015 22:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Coenonympha pamphilus?

20.07.2015 22:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Lythria cruentaria?

20.07.2015 22:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Polyommatus ripartii?

20.07.2015 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Until this season Pheosia gnoma considered infrequent in their territories: all time come across similar speciesPheosia tremula.
And this summer, as the burst: all time comes when she and Pheosia tremula - no ....
Truly strange things)))

20.07.2015 19:20, Daria Milkova:

What a beautiful girl!!

20.07.2015 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

And where all the initial butterflies? Geography? Date?

20.07.2015 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.07.2015 16:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometra papilionaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 15:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris aurichalcana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 15:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Understood thanks. Just 41481, the same author identified V. Sergienko. It seemed to me that this is one butterfly.

20.07.2015 14:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Reserves Photo # 37717

20.07.2015 14:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gastropacha quercifolia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Nemophora fasciella / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The top line was written the name of the species) put in order

20.07.2015 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

And why the author Valery Chernukhin definition?

20.07.2015 14:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gastropacha populifolia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalera bucephala / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula floslactata / Confidently identified / Valery Chernukhin.

20.07.2015 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And on top of beetle Cleridae: Pestryakov bee Trichodes apiarius (Linnaeus, 1758))))

20.07.2015 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Macrothylacia rubi / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 14:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Spilosoma lubricipeda / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio machaon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to indicate when it is clear from the photo. I specifically for this picture is clear: why have. Where not so clearly seen to indicate it is not necessary, of course)))

20.07.2015 13:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Macrothylacia rubi / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notodonta dromedarius / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 13:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aedia funesta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 13:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Abdomens different course :)) generally copies can be straightened on uglyadet what that difference in the shape of the wing. You're so words, neither of which is not explained, but would like to, and copies of proposed showed. Antennae, but different. I mean, is it worth not very sharp photos, which is invisible all the sex differences indicate the floor.The Germans led only straightened.

20.07.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

20.07.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

20.07.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

20.07.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

20.07.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

20.07.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

20.07.2015 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

20.07.2015 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

20.07.2015 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhia exprimens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I just, really, "the dog ate": we have a kind of normal)))
The abdomen is visually different from the floor.
And of course the shape of the wing, too different)))

20.07.2015 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas sylvata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I see they only differ mustache if picture quality, others do not see a difference :(

20.07.2015 13:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Laspeyria flexula / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Odonestis pruni / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The shape of the wing at the top floor is very different: it is for those cases where it is not visible abdomen. Stopudovo, my dog ​​ate the difference :) and no lepiforuma here do not)))
Male from Ukraine: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25661
Male from Moscow reg .: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41154
The male of the Vladimir region .: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23471
Link to other resources: http://insectamo.ru/hete/100-hete/arctiidae/1183-miltochrista-miniata

20.07.2015 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Riveted still "ginandromorfa" of these http://www.lepiforum.de/bh/personen/egbert_friedrich_2/11517_miniata_Miltochrista_m2A.jpg http://www.lepiforum.de/bh/personen/egbert_friedrich_2/11520_miniata_Miltochrista_f2A.jpg
here male and female, and show once again, I did not understand

20.07.2015 12:50, Daria Milkova:

Vasily, thank you!

20.07.2015 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mimas tiliae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomographa bimaculata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula bicuspis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stauropus fagi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 12:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Zanclognatha lunalis ?

20.07.2015 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arctia caja / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Smerinthus caecus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aedia funesta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2015 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Daria, for information about the melanism: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Меланизм

20.07.2015 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Phalera bucephala / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

20.07.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura erminea / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

20.07.2015 12:13, Alexander Belousov:

Cerura erminea

20.07.2015 12:09, Alexander Belousov:

Phalera bucephala

20.07.2015 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually here. Riveted "ginandromorfa" from their own photo)))
Pay attention is where are the blue plus sign.
This clear and natural gender differences in the species)

20.07.2015 10:22, Daria Milkova:

Yes, normal too. And this is too much pigment?

20.07.2015 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Probably did so, melanistic. Or anything else I can think of no. :)
In addition, you also have a normal fly.

20.07.2015 10:12, Daria Milkova:

It also Arctia Flavia? With completely black front wings?

20.07.2015 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, show me what I did not see. On other sites I looked too found what differences.

20.07.2015 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomaspilis marginata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 9:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drepana curvatula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diachrysia zosimi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote bankiana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.07.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

20.07.2015 9:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Euthrix potatoria

20.07.2015 8:33, Yuri Semejkin:

What kind of nonsense again? Title Edit-delete lights, but editing is not.
Okay, I might add here. Alexander, again revised, but the opinion has not changed. I should add that in the Altai still have similar T. griseata, but she bend near the apex of the front wing is completely different. Watched here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/9836

20.07.2015 8:23, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Thank you!

20.07.2015 8:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Image quality is nothing to do :)
At the upper edge of the front wing in a species I can see the floor well.
Male: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23471
Female: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23473

20.07.2015 8:06, Yuri Semejkin:

So what ? More specifically, the 24 region, which includes the Altai -4 species. Three disappear immediately, there is only Timandta comae.Tolko her wintergreen fringe, wide, and wintergreen sling. Sling above and below are also the same general shape as well.
In the Far East there is a similar, T. recompta. But it does not appear in the Altai.

20.07.2015 7:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.07.2015 7:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.07.2015 7:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, like you on this photo has considered that the male? Just wondering.

20.07.2015 7:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Laothoe populi / Daria Milkova Laothoe amurensis / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 7:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are three types of Timandra.

20.07.2015 7:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa bractea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 7:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.07.2015 7:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucoma salicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 6:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arctia flavia / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 6:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.07.2015 3:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Duck kind of Timandra comae

20.07.2015 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.07.2015 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hestina divona / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.07.2015 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hestina divona / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.07.2015 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

WellMinois dryaslike?

19.07.2015 23:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hestina divona (Hewitson, 1861)

19.07.2015 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.07.2015 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

19.07.2015 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Miltochrista miniata / Confidently identified / Daria Milkova.

19.07.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Rohana macar / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.07.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Rohana macar / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.07.2015 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euploea mulciber / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.07.2015 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euploea mulciber / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.07.2015 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lasiocampa quercus / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.07.2015 22:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male Rohana macar Wallace, 1869

19.07.2015 22:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea mulciber mulciber (Cramer, [1777]) male

19.07.2015 22:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lasiocampa quercus female

19.07.2015 21:35, Igor Sakhno:

The masterpieces!

19.07.2015 19:46, Nikolay Grebennikov:

female.

19.07.2015 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Spilosoma lubricipeda / Confidently identified / Female / Gleba Basil.

19.07.2015 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She is the female.
Deathly some: with color / light apparently went wrong.

19.07.2015 16:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Now it is possible and probably deleted as well as http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33171

19.07.2015 15:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Last age

19.07.2015 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catoptria falsella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.07.2015 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Watched all Hypena, I put technically wrong, technical error :)

19.07.2015 15:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypena proboscidalis Hypena kengkalis.

19.07.2015 14:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena proboscidalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.07.2015 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema sororcula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.07.2015 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polypogon tentacularia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.07.2015 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diachrysia chryson / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.07.2015 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna ferrago / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.07.2015 14:04, Yulia Semenova:

thank)))

19.07.2015 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.07.2015 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.07.2015 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.07.2015 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.07.2015 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

IDiachrysia chryson

19.07.2015 7:16, Nikolay Grebennikov:

male.

19.07.2015 2:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

IMythimna ferrago, which got a lot in my life :)

19.07.2015 2:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterophorus pentadactyla / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

18.07.2015 23:51, Yulia Semenova:

Tell me, please, who is this?

18.07.2015 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

18.07.2015 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

18.07.2015 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

18.07.2015 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

18.07.2015 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

18.07.2015 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.07.2015 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.07.2015 17:25, Peter Khramov:

All users Lepidoptera.ru the end of July for cutting nets Entosphinx (pens, hoops bags) with 10% discount plus free delivery to VOD in Moscow, Nizhny Novgorod, St. Petersburg, Cheboksary, Tver, Vladimir, Kazan, Ekaterinburg and Tula.
List of products: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/s170

17.07.2015 15:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis hecate / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

17.07.2015 15:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

Brenthis hecate

17.07.2015 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lobophora halterata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

17.07.2015 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomaspilis marginata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

17.07.2015 14:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir photos never in abundance. Especially, if these photos from different places)))
If space on the site allows - it means it is necessary to place. There is nothing criminal in this: individuals of all different photo and should be a maximum of possibilities for comparison.

17.07.2015 14:26, Basil Sergienko:

Lomaspilis marginata

17.07.2015 14:13, Basil Sergienko:

Lobophora halterata

17.07.2015 13:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I add perhaps another supporting point zreniya.Matov AY I determined it exactly the same. As he says, it is quite common in mixed and deciduous forests of Primorye.
It is strange that it is the first site.

17.07.2015 13:41, Vladimir Bryukhov:

I understand that pictures of Apollo has in abundance. But, I think, it is one of the most northern Apollo, if not the most. I met for the first time, but I hope for the next year and look for caterpillars and butterflies.

17.07.2015 10:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idia quadra / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

17.07.2015 8:55, Basil Sergienko:

Idia quadra, I think

17.07.2015 8:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Fly, but not so much. Sling well preserved, and the point on the sides. I'll try to throw Kirpichnikova ....

17.07.2015 8:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

drawing one and another form of wings, can be very shabby?

17.07.2015 2:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio dialis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.07.2015 2:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio dialis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.07.2015 2:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lebadea martha / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.07.2015 2:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lebadea martha / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.07.2015 2:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo eurilochus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

17.07.2015 2:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.07.2015 2:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Olga Titova.

17.07.2015 2:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Stichophthalma howqua / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

17.07.2015 2:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Stichophthalma howqua / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

17.07.2015 1:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Acropentias aurea ?

17.07.2015 0:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

16.07.2015 21:05, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

16.07.2015 21:03, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo memnon

16.07.2015 21:01, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

16.07.2015 20:59, Alex Dumchus:

Lebadea martha (samuibutterflies.com)

16.07.2015 20:57, Alex Dumchus:

Stichopthalma howqua, female

16.07.2015 20:53, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio dialis ssp dodsi, def. by http://swallowtails.net/

16.07.2015 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.07.2015 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.07.2015 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, is apparently the same as the butterfly that number 5126?

16.07.2015 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.07.2015 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.07.2015 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.07.2015 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.07.2015 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.07.2015 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #14070 group.

16.07.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #14069 group.

16.07.2015 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For the accuracy of geographic data :)
43 kilometer, which is in the Noginsk district of Defense has never been a station: all life is a "dacha" platform. Located from my town a few stops on the train, Therefore I know for sure)))

16.07.2015 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.07.2015 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

16.07.2015 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

16.07.2015 19:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kunugia undans / Confidently identified / Baryshenko Andrey.

16.07.2015 19:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hyponephele lupinus / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2015 19:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lobesia botrana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2015 19:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala nupta / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2015 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe ferrugata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.07.2015 19:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thalera fimbrialis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2015 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pelurga comitata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2015 16:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No, it can not be, so as not to pay attention. Simply do not get it to me so early. I meticulously all from the screen of rowing, including micro)))

16.07.2015 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So just do not pay attention :))
She has come a long flight is: from May to October (almost the entire season).
And in fact the first I collected this year as much as 28 April: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39878

16.07.2015 13:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I saw them only at the end of June to July. First appearing in our May Caradrina morpheus (Hufnagel, 1766)

16.07.2015 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lasiocampidae course (moth sometimes colloquially referred to). Euthrix potatoria, of course)))

16.07.2015 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if only by date: then it is understandable. She and our very first appear :)

16.07.2015 9:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not strong in the Russian names, but it seems he lasiocampidae, not Silkworm it.

16.07.2015 9:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, bring a different kind of Caradrina, which flies in early May in the Carpathians? is not Hoplodrina.

16.07.2015 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Feel free ....

16.07.2015 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caradrina clavipalpis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2015 9:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypochalcia dignella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2015 9:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrhoe alternata / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

16.07.2015 8:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ematurga atomaria / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

16.07.2015 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.07.2015 8:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colotois pennaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2015 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea inquinata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

15.07.2015 22:50, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea inquinata

15.07.2015 22:42, Leon Ortlieb:

Very similar to Polygonia egea, although judging by the areal Jungar Alatau is not named for egei in that book, but called for egei habitat adjacent ridges .. And in Jungar Alatau has been described for the first time interpozita.

15.07.2015 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula floslactata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

15.07.2015 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema venusta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Catopsilia scylla / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Catopsilia scylla / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

this move, so as not hanging

15.07.2015 22:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, it is

15.07.2015 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put this fellow: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39662
What varies so wildly?

15.07.2015 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Discophora deo / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Discophora deo / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Discophora sondaica / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Discophora sondaica / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orsotriaena medus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male Discophora deo de Niceville, 1898

15.07.2015 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orsotriaena medus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 22:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female Discophora sondaica

15.07.2015 22:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypochrosis hyadaria like

15.07.2015 22:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Orsotriaena medus

15.07.2015 21:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Smelly male Catopsilia scylla (Linnaeus, 1763). What confused ???

15.07.2015 21:49, Basil Sergienko:

I think Scopula floslactata

15.07.2015 20:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Valery, it is desirable to clear the box "Comments by the author," that would not be duplication of filming locations.

15.07.2015 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Actias maenas / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

15.07.2015 19:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gillmeria pallidactyla / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2015 19:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gillmeria pallidactyla / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.07.2015 18:09, Alex Dumchus:

Well, I do not selenium that have much shorter tails and the color is more green. Most A.maenas

15.07.2015 16:05, Evgeny Kotelevsky:

I guess it Actias selene

15.07.2015 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

After him how to trim (((Maybe all the fault of what is cool now we have no rain, and even flying very mediocre.
In short veshichki I gathered and went home.
Herbal silkworms only drank all the nerves: crazy and restless butterfly. It flies like a rocket, beating on the screen and everything else scares ...... gathered heels edification: to avoid flickers :)

15.07.2015 14:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

first time I hear that the rain interrupted the night years

15.07.2015 14:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

As photos of them, of course, does not define these genital differences. Butterfly not only in the hands of the need to keep. Mikalezisy difficult group and the photos of them to determine - you either know them very well, or poke a finger in the sky. Article here Entomologist 102 (1279), but it is not publicly available. By the way do not forget about the form M. pitana (Staudinger, 1897).That is, if you do not get bored, read a mess going on there. http://www.bicyclus.se/docs/Brattstrom_et_el_2014_TLR.pdf

15.07.2015 11:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Zygaena lonicerae

15.07.2015 11:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2015 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Valery, just noticed. When uploading photos, there are two special fields, which should be possible to fill in the appropriate data.
This The date and time of shooting / fishing and Location shooting / fishing .
And in the Additional Information / note is written completely different information.
Please bear this in mind for the future.Wrap then - a thankless task ((

15.07.2015 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 10:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 9:15, Leon Ortlieb:

Thanks Basil!
Thank you Alexander!
So gray. A yellow wing it goes the other subspecies?

15.07.2015 9:12, Evgeny Kotelevsky:

Peter, I agree that it is a pity, but the road will lie down and wait for a precise definition

15.07.2015 9:11, Evgeny Kotelevsky:

Dmitri, in vague, so vague in order to exactly how we will understand. And you as genital differences define photo? If not mistaken, then this tie is necessary to keep in the hands of

15.07.2015 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Interesting (zheltokrylaya) it kind of you :)

15.07.2015 8:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euclidia glyphica / Leon Ortlieb Euclidia mi / Alexander Belousov.

15.07.2015 8:05, Alexander Belousov:

Leon, please enter the date of recording.

15.07.2015 8:02, Alexander Belousov:

Euclidia mi

15.07.2015 7:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not chipped and even look at it is not similar. Not only do not know, whether there is even chipped in Novosibirsk region. ?
It is alleged that this butterfly is masked under the most hornet (wasp soyershenno from another family) :))
I will request the author: Valeri, please fill out the field The date and time of shooting / fishing This is pretty important.

15.07.2015 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sesia apiformis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2015 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sesia apiformis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.07.2015 7:00, Nikolay Grebennikov:

yes it is a wasp from the family of chips.

15.07.2015 3:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In such a state can not be determined (((
Caradrina sp. / Hoplodrina sp. ???
Material not yet assembled ..... probably be her forever in indefinite (

15.07.2015 2:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Today, I shone a little 2 kilometers from the house. That is all that is gathered about an hour until it started to rain and the whole flight is interrupted (
While webworm No: not yet time seems.
But the dominance of the notoriousEilema griseola(do not take already) andEuthrix potatoria. And still a lot of all Micra, which did not take.
Returned considered "empty-handed" ((

P.S.Webworm has not yet come. Peter, by the way: make a blog last, and that the second season is already at the turn of Muscovy, and the case is still in the dead center ....

15.07.2015 2:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pokoldovat sensitive.
Leon, the top line is not necessary to write the name of the species. Based on the comments we ourselves shall understand :)

15.07.2015 2:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Leon Ortlieb Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 2:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It was loaded as Paranthrene insolita and because of this got to uncertainty.

15.07.2015 2:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

15.07.2015 2:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Araschnia doris / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 2:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Araschnia doris / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 2:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanitis leda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 2:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanitis leda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 2:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euthalia aconthea / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

15.07.2015 2:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euthalia aconthea / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

15.07.2015 2:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Anthocharis cardamines / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.07.2015 1:29, Leon Ortlieb:

A little different than saytovskie .. Agree?

15.07.2015 0:00, Peter Khramov:

It's a pity.

15.07.2015 0:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Mycalesis patiana / Confidently identified / Evgeny Kotelevsky Not identified.

14.07.2015 23:13, Leon Ortlieb:

I changed references. I agree, if not uniquely determined by the types of produce that .. Thanks!

14.07.2015 22:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Honestly, I consider them one species altitudnymi forms.

14.07.2015 22:43, Leon Ortlieb:

Yeah, I saw the photo and dark and light. And I could not understand where the boundary permissible. And in that book about the height of said moist foothills, ie not more than 1000 meters.
It would be interesting to look at the collection of the whiteflies in high quantities with different variations .. Thanks!

14.07.2015 22:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

in my opinion it NADI. Pieris bryoniae darker flies much higher (if not mistaken 2-2.5 thousand meters) they are not in general

14.07.2015 22:18, Leon Ortlieb:

Dmitry, the people here, too, his head breaks Pieris brioniae a view poluvid etc. http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t491549.html

The Germans called Pieris brioniae pierid mountain.
I do not know how to distinguish them and where is the limit of permissible variations ..
As written above, p. 39, it is quite similar to these. Now what is the difference?

14.07.2015 22:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Araschnia doris female summer generation

14.07.2015 22:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Melanitis leda

14.07.2015 22:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.07.2015 22:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yeah, female

14.07.2015 21:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The female of Anthocharis cardamines

14.07.2015 21:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pile Pieris napi on the heap do not know whose.

14.07.2015 21:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eugene! It turns out you were determined by baldy- seems / is unlikely. But this option is not satisfied with what you http: //lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/54595 ??? Also looks like ??? But the description of the type you need to watch (quite possibly genital differences). So it must be in an indefinite, until we know 100% difference. I have 20 copies, but still can not determine (((

14.07.2015 21:21, Leon Ortlieb:

Something not found on the site of whiteflies .. Or are synonymous to me unknown?

14.07.2015 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if one species Belyanko - then I think you can.
A substrate .... What can I say: Many butterflies love this deal: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27678)))

14.07.2015 18:17, Leon Ortlieb:

So good, Basil! I myself can see three species. Only one do not agree, the argument does not suffice.

Everything is okay!
There's still a bunch of one type of whiteflies have, on a pile of horse manure. Maybe it will be easier?

14.07.2015 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not think, you said. I do not want reassuring: the material is not present yet. As in the saying: "If you, would know where to drop-straw-to bed," In the past year, at which time the entire balcony was littered with them, but not collected (not what she told me was a) Collect-call: to be (I'm starting from vyshenapisannogo) :)

14.07.2015 17:38, Peter Khramov:

Depending of type of result - that's good. But if I promised to call on Sunday, so it must be on a Sunday, even if it is and preliminary.

14.07.2015 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So eating grass :) Frankly I thought at him, but did not write ......

14.07.2015 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, just in this photo clearly several species and I do not understand what to give preference to supply to any one in certain :)
There are already similar group photos where it is not clear where to put though like all objects are defined.

14.07.2015 15:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Angerona prunaria / Confidently identified / Female / Yuri Semejkin.

14.07.2015 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I received but not yet called.
Today I plan to hit the road on a marshy meadow shine (if weather permits) and the call depending on the result.
While it does not renounce: the flight of her in my area July - August, and the summer we can see for yourself what ...... All dates are shifted.

14.07.2015 14:21, Yuri Semejkin:

A newborn in the cocoon.

14.07.2015 14:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Angerona prunaria

14.07.2015 13:39, Peter Khramov:

By the way, about this site. People, and tell me, here http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Species%20index.htm (lower section, Scientific name indexes) classification is more or less adequate or not?

14.07.2015 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

14.07.2015 10:22, Evgeny Kotelevsky:

Dmitry, I'm not an entomologist, and the difference can not explain to you ... that's defined on the site - http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Malaysia%20-%20Mycalesis%20patiana.htm

14.07.2015 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diachrysia chrysitis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.07.2015 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia oleracea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.07.2015 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Severe cases only by process of elimination you can determine. :)

14.07.2015 0:32, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil, I had sat for about an hour, picking arguments sites viewed, links found to continue the discussion, he wrote, but he forgot to copy itself .. and sent. Gluck, and my comment was gone for good .. .. It was annoying .. And then like a bud that you have seen and read your:
"Silent means consent". As the joke .. It is ridiculous of course, but you guessed comments with respect to time ..Oh well. But once again, back to the issue, look for the answer, and the desire was not yet ..

13.07.2015 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phigalia pilosaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma conterminana / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

13.07.2015 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma conterminana / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

13.07.2015 22:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2015 22:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Irina Nikulina.

13.07.2015 22:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea auricruda / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

13.07.2015 22:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cephonodes picus / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.07.2015 22:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cephonodes picus / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.07.2015 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cabera griseolimbata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

13.07.2015 21:49, Shamil Murtazin:

Eucosma conterminana?

13.07.2015 21:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Laid gusyanku with sea buckthorn and all stages to adult.

13.07.2015 21:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you! =)

13.07.2015 20:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

13.07.2015 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiommata petropolitana / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

13.07.2015 20:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mesoleuca albicillata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

13.07.2015 20:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

13.07.2015 20:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ematurga atomaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

13.07.2015 20:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ematurga atomaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

13.07.2015 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Ilia Ustiantcev.

13.07.2015 18:25, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea auricruda

13.07.2015 15:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Alexander! Looked. From there, your option is more suitable, but doubts remain over the form ...

13.07.2015 15:39, Basil Sergienko:

Mesoleuca albicillata

13.07.2015 14:59, Alex Dumchus:

Yuri. I use the site https://sphin-sea.unibas.ch/SphinSEA/SphinSEA_speclist.htm

13.07.2015 14:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Something can not be edited. Ps I find what looked. Everywhere 1-2 species, site 1 more.
Still, I'm for option Cephonodes hylas. Let's see what al. Say.

13.07.2015 14:44, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Lasiommata petropolitana.

13.07.2015 14:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, take a look here for more http://mypets.by/cephonodes-hylas It would be necessary to review all the species of Southeast Asia. The site that originally looked at all are only two species of the genus

13.07.2015 14:01, Alex Dumchus:

Or Cephonodes picus, more like, as usual there.

13.07.2015 13:48, Basil Sergienko:

Scopula nigropunctata

13.07.2015 13:43, Basil Sergienko:

and that

13.07.2015 13:43, Basil Sergienko:

Neponyatpo, why is this the atomic undefined

13.07.2015 13:40, Basil Sergienko:

I think it is-Cabera griseolimbata

13.07.2015 13:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Put please Ilia in "determinants".

13.07.2015 3:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Euthrix potatoria

13.07.2015 1:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Cephonodes hylas ( Linnaeus, 1771

13.07.2015 1:04, Yuri Semejkin:

I would say that this Cephonodes hylas (Linnaeus, 1771) http://www.danaida.ru/sem14/ceph.htm

12.07.2015 21:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

12.07.2015 21:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Explain the difference between M. patiana Eliot, 1969 (I can not find the description of the species) and M. anapita fucentia Fruhstorfer 1911 and the second year I'm racking my head

12.07.2015 19:33, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Seokia pratti / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

12.07.2015 13:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Family Limacodidae

12.07.2015 13:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Seokia pratti

12.07.2015 5:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, so that there examples. I originally got this book. I certainly think straight enough in the pictures, but it seems to me that there is not removed with the flash, and a well-podobranny illuminated object, etc., etc ...... That is not enough at whom it turns out, both normal black background (and gray) is very difficult to pick up and we have a shaman editors.And on paper, everything looks the same at: One paper, and therefore all have the same perception. But technically different and differently configured video subsystems computers a lot: on some computer looks good, and some bad ...

11.07.2015 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vlad Proklov.

11.07.2015 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Male & female / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.07.2015 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.07.2015 22:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carterocephalus palaemon / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.07.2015 22:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carterocephalus silvicola / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.07.2015 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Bena bicolorana / Evgeny Kotelevsky Pseudoips prasinana / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.07.2015 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Send SMS with the phone.

11.07.2015 20:09, Peter Khramov:

From what I saw on a black background, like foty from the book Butterflies of the World: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1699. It can be seen that the photographer magёt.
Examples ph there with translucent wings:



11.07.2015 20:02, Alex Dumchus:

And for me as a black fund sad somehow, almost like a funeral, life and so we are not too baluet- let light and more !!!

11.07.2015 18:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lopinga achine / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.07.2015 18:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

It looks like a synonym.

11.07.2015 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pareronia hippia / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

11.07.2015 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.07.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Loxostege sticticalisthat? Nalovlyu at least a hundred if the flight this year (should be). And that is what they needed and even as Moscow .... channels is not a problem with us: a common butterfly.

11.07.2015 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

All the commentators are right. It looks very good, but probably need a lighter background. :)

11.07.2015 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, all should be in the taxonomy leave as is. Any of our actions on these two kinds of speculation will be one person. Alexander should not have to put a photo of one species on another page if he is confident in the definition.Location data Chiasmia pluviata we do not know, can Alexander is not enough information and the type of present or present in these regions.

11.07.2015 13:45, Peter Khramov:

If there is or will be, then there man needs one or two pieces. Zanebesplatno. In Moscow.
Mail vinita_91 # mail.ru (@ instead of #) Galina.

11.07.2015 12:19, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you for your suggestions - everything was conceived even more !!!) Brought to Vladivostok nice weather the whole time! Thanks to all my friends Far East - trip turned out great !!! Lots of impressions, warm meeting! Sash regard GB - had to buy extra.memory card! ;))) Leave Jure 4 of exotic-looking animals from around the edges of the further education)) - terribly interested in who will) Today was the last in this year just 8:00 of the Ussuri taiga, goodbye) Now Semeykin ready to fatten at least for my exotic dishes made with ... sulfur-yellow Polypore:))) ...They say I'll live and still put a lot of photos on the site :))) If you use the famous brandy Ussuri :))) As for ticks - they seem to have decided that I've had enough))) However, in order to shoot up to much, here and although the second peak ((See you there!

11.07.2015 12:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Malinellus and gypsy moth were killed. Watching is not good for them (

11.07.2015 10:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, about transparency. Then the idea was to highlight the side of the wing, to expose all of the bristles on it and veins. It turned out not quite what I wanted. The most disadvantage of this scheme - it turns dark. On a white background so it does not turn.

11.07.2015 5:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you, Peter. Yes, it is very bright. Initially it was all yellow, but I like the evil genius stopped giving her flowers and she started eating leaves - Add green. Dolly she pointed, with fastening to the stem loop, a form I have not seen.

11.07.2015 1:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No wonder. There is really my size may depend on geography.
It is worth remembering swallowtail from Yakutia (if not mistaken) he does scale with our hives :)
P.S. Time is almost without an Internet (cellular modem is connected to a computer) so my activity is almost zero. But butterflies are caught productive future :))

10.07.2015 23:03, Peter Khramov:

Sinoinm, truly understand?

10.07.2015 23:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia hippia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.07.2015 23:01, Peter Khramov:

If someone notices what I promised to do, once cleared, but has not yet done - throw off the link on this question.
Apart from the second gallery and maps.

10.07.2015 19:07, Peter Khramov:

Good site. Sent a letter to the author, it may turn out to use it foty our site ...

10.07.2015 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Joined the congratulations. A devourer krestotsvetogo really as bright or faded yet? And so those same cabbage quite a similar ...

10.07.2015 18:27, Alex Dumchus:

Congratulations. And I have two Saturnia piri pupated, two izhrut devour all - but the output will -So much next year!

10.07.2015 18:11, Alex Dumchus:

Well, the size of a large copper-butterfly, which is nearby. One may just subspecies of the island, more than anything not found on Samui: samuibutterflies.com. They are there, I caught some, but others will be more.

10.07.2015 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Nifiga se. Et like this so? We can do more of what?

10.07.2015 15:28, Peter Khramov:

All realized yesterday I peening base types, and you at this time added a new, as well as could come.
Regarding this type - it is a synonym? Or just infu of this move, but do not synonymous?

10.07.2015 13:22, Alex Dumchus:

Gave photo because some dwarf, the scope of only 45 mm

10.07.2015 13:14, Alex Dumchus:

Pareronia anais

10.07.2015 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120717
So far, everything is fine. :)

10.07.2015 13:00, Alex Dumchus:

Orsotrianea medus

10.07.2015 12:47, Peter Khramov:

Alexander now has a new type, all the rules?

10.07.2015 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.07.2015 9:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.07.2015 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.07.2015 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

In this genus, all species, females are flightless.

10.07.2015 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male?

10.07.2015 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male?

10.07.2015 5:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did not want any no Skype.
Alexander and I did not have to teach me what to do when I did not ask about it. I was too "big boy" for this.
You do not want to live in peace, your business. Only here the "fight" I'm no one will, and sooner or later, just go to the site in such close attention from your side.This'll take your photos (all, not optional) because - as a draw the conclusion that the site they are not need . In this case, the photo still does not disappear, but will be used for business and will be in demand. This is certainly the worst case scenario, and very much hope that oschibayus in its conclusions before this matter will not come.

10.07.2015 3:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

10.07.2015 2:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

And the point? There's going to agree, but here we will do in its already passed. :(
And I will put what I think is necessary: ​​in this I have no one to talk sense. This is my point of view, for which the judge sin.
And I repeat: The moderator will be held here a few other functions than the nomination of "quality" photos otlizal painted and repainted in the editor-butterflies (can give examples, but I will not) ..

10.07.2015 2:20, Peter Khramov:

Well, again, Stoll will meet on Skype? ..

10.07.2015 1:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Once again, I will add this one again on the tracks I know personally the person that is able to at the last stage of the caterpillars 99% even predict the sex of the imago (himself convinced of this several times). That's about: just by looking at a caterpillar. And you say the age ...
Of course I still do not have such experience, but aspire))

10.07.2015 1:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not persuaded: it is generally few people can.
Do not think bad for God's sake :)
By the way: right now is write to collected yet another scoop, which in my opinion is not yet set)))
P.S. Bet, however:Enargia paleaceaBut still put: good male (large and clean) :)

10.07.2015 1:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not reach out :(

10.07.2015 0:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander briefly to answer (sorry dog ​​tired and want to rest so does not cover all aspects) :.
I do not chase for quantity and exhibited only what they want. And I will put what I think is necessary: ​​in this I have no one to talk sense. This is my point of view, for which the judge sin.Regarding the quality of the photo: as close as possible to the accuracy of the copies, which photographed: the good I have it in their hands, and not reproducing the look from memory :)
At about the age of the tracks I repeat: I specifically sorted out this issue with this view as it is interesting to me.And not only raised to the fourth age (my molted on the road, and in the form of five). Since that age exhibited in fact, not only when vyraschivaesch of eggs. Algorithm: pupate, the caterpillar then was the last age. Do you recognize the number of ages: if five - then the fifth :) Or sfotat caterpillar in October - means approx. the third age.Because the caterpillar of this species goes into hibernation third age. The logic is called.
And I repeat: The moderator will be held here a few other functions than the nomination of "quality" photos otlizal painted and repainted in the editor-butterflies (can give examples, but I will not) ..

10.07.2015 0:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

07/09/2015 23:16 Vasiliy Feoktistov
I do not know why not. Alexander comfortable with hanging kpapivnits, peacock, Swallowtail, Maak, altsinoev, lyudorfy etc. in insane quantities ... I did not have anything against it because in my opinion the more online photos of any butterfly - the better. Because each butterfly is unique in many ways.
But when you start to put someone that not all exhibits and since not everyone here is capable of in the forests and swamps of mosquitoes feed at night (so that's "Romance"): begin the questions, saying why expose :) Peter Jove himself is unclear. ))) Even a little disappointing ....
09.07.2015 22:17, Petr Khramov
When it comes to this instance, why not hang out. This is the second phot just unfolding, the more there is an indication of gender. Alexander, why not? ..
Peter and Basil, once again, it has repeatedly expressed, in one form or another, and least.I believe that Vasily chasing of photos online and ship whatever he catches the eye, and all that is new for him on the balcony, or where it catches. That's not bad or anything, well, there are fans that much fruitful shoot. And the common species and interesting, and all stages of development, a lot of photons.But they quality , a lot of new faces who put all that has been exposed. lens. those we have agreed not to touch :))) Let take root on the site.Vasily Moderator and ship sortable 3 photo, not a marriage, but poorly straightened edited in the editor, who eats a bunch of parts, and normal photographing it can not learn how to spread, and butterflies. He's the face of the site, all looking at him and do as he did. And an increasing number of online third-photo.You can look at the quality blind eye when it comes to the tropics, new species. However, for species for which there are already dozens of photos, upload another photo sortable 3, because the first time it flew onto the balcony, or you bitten by mosquitoes while shooting. This is not an argument.
I repeat.I am sad to look like a very passionate and hard-working man who set a very low bar and drives consumer goods to it. And the guys who just came to the site very quickly raised the quality of their work: Shamil Belousov.Do not give other sites, which is even worse, such as site barkodingu, there is another goal, it is necessary for his fight, what was the best :)
Basil, if you think you do note, it gives me pleasure, you are deeply mistaken. I do this not very nice, I know that I will get back a bunch of insults and misunderstanding.But bullied (I am somewhat exaggerates) on the site can not always survive.
Basil or when it is not necessary to write and tell people to write what you think, not what exactly it is.Age caterpillars stated in the case where you grow it out of eggs and molting think or vice versa think molting from pupation, but then you need to know exactly how many species molts.Frankly, I do not regret the time, still I want to reach out to Basil that he realized that this site is not a page in his class-mate contact or where he can write and to put whatever they want.This is a large site where there are hundreds of people, and go further, that he was the moderator, and the person making the site and it has put a photo as a moderator rather than as a simple user who puts any photos, believing that it made his task.
:))

09.07.2015 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

From the entrance to the pages of all kinds of fine, thank you :)

09.07.2015 23:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.07.2015 23:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Fourth time today add. :)
1. added successfully added. I go to the page type, a page is not back in the genus Destvitelno anymore.
2. Added suffered a photo.
3. After a while, look at the type of photo is not defined. Only add species to the genus, it immediately adjusts picture type.
In the evening add to this kind of still photos, it's OK.Who looked no view. He added 4 times. :)

09.07.2015 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, and where you added the second kind of remark to molbiola?

09.07.2015 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Ok, back to the time Vertan consensus.

09.07.2015 22:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Erannis golda / Alexander Kuzmin Erannis jacobsoni / Irina Nikulina.

09.07.2015 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

I answered mobiole.

09.07.2015 22:20, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, the transfer was based on the author's first forum in this thread: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=558423.

09.07.2015 22:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthalia aconthea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

09.07.2015 22:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthalia aconthea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

09.07.2015 22:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthalia adonia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

09.07.2015 22:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthalia adonia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

09.07.2015 22:15, Peter Khramov:

The emphasis does not see any reason for such miracles. Trying to repeat specifically for your algorithm - all the rules.

09.07.2015 22:13, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, check, now everything should work.

09.07.2015 21:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2015 21:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2015 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 21:02, Alex Dumchus:

Eupthalia aconthea

09.07.2015 21:00, Alex Dumchus:

Eupthalia adonia

09.07.2015 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gushed. The first photo on my website (uploaded May 13, 2009). Then I stumbled on the network to this site and decided to illustrate the kind of (it used to be here for the first photo).
What has happened is history ...)))
By the way: This is my first and last find butterflies in my locality: May 6, and still did not meet representatives of the species has never in the vicinity of my city.What would it say about her ordinariness .........

09.07.2015 20:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chiasmia hebesata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.07.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2015 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2015 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

09.07.2015 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2015 18:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2015 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2015 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not claim that the transfer of doubtful.
Alexander Kuzmin lived there and quite seriously engaged moths in its region. On the basis of his opinion I would have preferred to all others.
P.S. Apparently it is a reason and I looked like Erannis golda more February 12, 2014. Yes persuaded then)))

09.07.2015 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put it in the vague because already all head broke ((.
It can be defined here?
Photos of the genus on the site almost as not, and butterfly for my gathering dust bins - disorder)

09.07.2015 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Silent means consent :)

09.07.2015 11:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chiasmia pluviata Chiasmia hebesata.

09.07.2015 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cupido buddhista / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb Not identified.

09.07.2015 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cupido buddhista / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb Not identified.

09.07.2015 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter transferred to the doubtful mind. From what you can see, I did not endure. The photographs presented Alexander Kuzmin, photo largely corresponds Erannis jacobsoni. Can mix photos, because the edge band is narrowed in the photo just at Erannis jacobsoni. Now again I go into this question do not want to.I think the question remains open on a photo are not 100% guarantee.

09.07.2015 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There are many more: in the winter (and maybe more than one) will be enough :)

09.07.2015 10:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Erannis jacobsoni / Irina Nikulina Erannis golda / Alexander Kuzmin.

09.07.2015 0:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What to do with them? In uncertain?

09.07.2015 0:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Brenthis daphne / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Not identified.

09.07.2015 0:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Once Argynnis and even to the species is undetectable ... So go for the time being in limbo.

09.07.2015 0:02, Eugene Karolinskiy:

And by the way, in the system of some chaos with systematics Argynnis. For example, in its composition have subgenus Fabriciana (IMHO the most mainstream), but there are separate taxa (species?) Coredippe, vorax, nerippe, xanthodippe, as related here, but there is still a separate genus Fabriciana ... Similar story with other genera in Argynnini. In general, I realize that all is not so simple, and in 5 minutes is not done ...If not written there - I ask to move a comment to the right place.

08.07.2015 23:57, Eugene Karolinskiy:

It is not Brenthis. Some Argynnis. Male. Prior to the form does not venture to the Far East with them is very difficult.

08.07.2015 22:10, Alexander Belousov:

From top to bottom - Alexis Amanda argiolus, Alexis, and three argiolus Amanda. Could in someone to make a mistake. A Cupido buddhista observed at altitudes of 2300 to 3400 m. Your shot is more than a kilometer below.

08.07.2015 20:54, Leon Ortlieb:

Where to find it? Why exactly there?

08.07.2015 20:18, Alexander Belousov:

Leon, I found only - Polyommatus amandus, Glaucopsyche alexis, Celastrina argiolus. Maybe someone will make out? Cupido buddhista exactly no.

08.07.2015 18:33, Leon Ortlieb:

Dozens of butterflies gathered in one place, at the watering. When I got a little closer, they scattered .. There was no desire to have to wait, make a copy .. So there were only pictures taken from a distance.

08.07.2015 18:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Basil! I looked at the link. Regarding the underside. Basil, like so and so, if there is a spread, plus a caterpillar to chrysalis. In general, almost complete set

08.07.2015 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So maybe the species. That is absolutely accurate to compare the Moscow region: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/37-rhop/nymphalidae/141-brenthis-daphne
This site is definitely not wrong to happen :)
Generally Picture checkered top and perlamutrovok better opportunity to make a photo and underside. In order to reduce the doubt to a minimum)

08.07.2015 17:41, Yuri Semejkin:

I would like to ask about the white fringe. Not all pictures of this type, it is present on the site. This is as it should be?

08.07.2015 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, nobody nowhere and nothing pours.
It's just that most of the butterflies as we all know, after molting a caterpillar changes and appearance.
There have been attempts to establish the age of the tracks on the photo. I, say very much seems that http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40570 and http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 40569 is quite different in appearance, caterpillars (respectively, and different age groups) and view the blame. And it looks like a caterpillar fifth age of this species, I know from their own experience: already the third year in a row they find in places that monitor. Like I never considered myself a color-blind :)

08.07.2015 16:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, like enough to "catch the wind in a net." Everything is contained, all in plain sight, someone who wanted to read what he says .....
Vladimir! I hope you do not mind if I say a few words about your caterpillar. Suppose that in the future you are not surprised if the caterpillar cease to exist ... This is just a sign that it is going to pupate.If it covers the whole and there are no signs of decay, do not rush to throw it. It may pupate, with a doll can be quite brisk.
But there may be exceptions when the caterpillar is really dead. There may be different reasons. For example, when the caterpillar is infected by a parasite such as sawflies, rider or others.a "fly" Caterpillar may even pupate, but come out of it then someone else, but not a butterfly. Who wants to can follow this chain and thus can be found even to the kind who kills this type of butterfly ....

08.07.2015 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, are all tracks that of the Old Omutisch (this is my point, and I drive them people sometimes) the fifth age. Including by A. Ponomaryov. We were together when there were :) Note: Date of shooting close: at my 18.05.2014 http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29322 and Andrey 19.05.2014 http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 36411
I do not know why he put the nineteenth: apparently because rented home on the day after the trip))
That is exactly five years and not subject to discussion.
Similarly, my geese from which I brought a butterfly on a page which we are discussing all this: while I was driving her home, she had time to molt on the road.And before moulting look like a memory of your photo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40570 which has quite a few similarities with the adjacent photo in the group. Hence the conclusion :).

08.07.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You probably second or third age. Caterpillar hibernate third age: everywhere throughout the area.

08.07.2015 15:49, Vladimir Bryukhov:

And as the date to determine the age of the shooting? I have the same picture on the first of September ...

08.07.2015 15:45, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Re: Vladimir, I figured with the amount of ages :)
Basil there between shots 7 minutes passed ...). This same goose. And the age of the photo is unlikely to determine exactly. If only the of eggs grew.

08.07.2015 15:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaecia aruna / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

08.07.2015 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaecia aruna / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

08.07.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

NB. Vladimir, I figured with the amount of ages :) send in comments to photos.

08.07.2015 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The bad news is that there is no shooting date (it was, would be needed to determine the age of the caterpillar).

08.07.2015 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fifth (last) Age. It should be noted in the top line.

08.07.2015 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fifth (last) Age. It should be noted in the top line.

08.07.2015 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fifth (last) Age. It should be noted in the top line.

08.07.2015 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fifth (last) Age. It should be noted in the top line.

08.07.2015 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fourth age.
It should be noted in the top line.

08.07.2015 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fifth (last) Age.
It should be noted in the top line.

08.07.2015 12:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Re Vladimir belly.
"No, Basil, is molting. And the skin is, as usual, was alone in a corner. But after molting has not fed ..."
Vladimir, you're right. Sorry. That I did not notice simple: you have two photos just different age caterpillars.
Here is a picture: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40570 penultimate age.
And in this photo: http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 40569 last age)))
It will be necessary to find out the number of tracks ages (probably five, but do not know exactly for this type), and then you will need to specify the age of the notorious top line))

08.07.2015 11:55, Nikolay Grebennikov:

and the name of a subspecies? I did not find that anywhere else.

08.07.2015 11:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, totally agree. Someone says one thing and someone else. You can not fit under one standard all the comments, and the more thoughts of different people. It applies to you and me ..... Actually all.
It all began with exact dates of life certain dolls.pupae and from a specific region on the page of the form (((
It was enough to simply specify: "The pupal stage lasts for two weeks," , and all without the unnecessary details. That was the gist of my remarks very unfortunate that you did not catch it (((
For example: I have collected in a series of decent number of copies of the same typeEilema griseolain the period from 06.23.2015 at 04.07.2015: I will not, I write it on the page type? That's why I will not write that the flight of the imago her from June through August and generation for the entire period of flight known to be more than one.Indicate special cases there is not "gut" (((
After all, on the basis of these data on the site there are formalized obschevidovye signs and doing it online is your humble servant. And thank God, that the lifetime of the pupae are not formalized)))
All ... stop. It is better to do business.

08.07.2015 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's definitely not Apotomis capreana. Variant of the answer more than two views will unfortunately not definite angle and quality of copies. do not allow to make the correct determination.

08.07.2015 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apotomis capreana / Tentatively identified / Tomislav Jemric Not identified.

08.07.2015 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cucullia pustulata / Confidently identified / Larva / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.07.2015 10:06, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Re: Vladimir, I think that it is you do not shed (it seemed to you), but just died ((
No, Basil, is molting. And the skin is, as usual, was alone in a corner. But after molting has not fed ...

08.07.2015 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

08.07.2015 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

08.07.2015 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, please see why I can not go into some kind of (change information), as a curator for the shovel. For example http://lepidoptera.ru/aspecies/7526, it is necessary to remove the brackets, but this particular case, what is the reason? I go to many other freely.

08.07.2015 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, and here the "Note of the author", talking about the top line, which should clarify the classification and age of caterpillars, like so decided, not amateur.
His advice leave with me, they do not stand or anything (not for me, not for others, only harm them site). On this photo you sent me himself asking him to look http: // lepidoptera.ru / taxonomy / 6703, not obessud I looked and commented on.
This is to ensure that all its actions need to think through how they will look not only your eyes but also the other side.

08.07.2015 0:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not really: all is not lost. Despite the fact that all contain opium poppies: the poppy "east" and not real, "opium" :)

07.07.2015 23:40, Leon Ortlieb:

Addict ..

07.07.2015 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter flies off transfer. Nothing it did in the LC. Only otkommentil otkommentit how could anyone other user .... And still flew (((

07.07.2015 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

07.07.2015 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

07.07.2015 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, I think that it is you do not shed (it seemed to you), but just died ((
The thing is that you have my photos on: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40569 last age)))

07.07.2015 19:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, the string "Comment author" specific to the taxonomy has not. The author writes his, personal comment on the butterfly, which is shown in the photo. And as long as it will be called "Comment author": so be it.As for the top line: there I also did not clarify on the taxonomy, and in essence (permitted with).
P.S. My advice to you: do not stop and exposes himself to the ugly side. I watch you again suffered something: you begin to purposefully seek out for me (looks svolochnaya). Why would it?

07.07.2015 19:40, Vladimir Bryukhov:

And my will is not, as died. But again I molted before.

07.07.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same butterfly that I previously took for Moths.
Thank you Vasily vnёsshemu clarity ...
Avon turned out :)

07.07.2015 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

07.07.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

07.07.2015 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Especially charming refinement of taxonomy :)))

07.07.2015 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander.
The most important thing I brought this couple overnight and one stain. Side by side on the canvas sat :)

07.07.2015 15:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna impura / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mythimna pallens / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.07.2015 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna impura / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mythimna pallens / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.07.2015 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.07.2015 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.07.2015 15:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whew ... this outing almost all (one Moths left for later). All species that today website Download one point and assembled in half an hour))) He took a self-selective: only those butterflies, which are considered interesting for yourself.
Alexander, look, please the two Mythimna sp. and two Xestia sp. the correctness of the definition. Any I have with them ((

07.07.2015 12:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, Alexander. Certainly before. Gigabytes and so wild. Well, that a spare battery is.
I have handed over the phone.

07.07.2015 11:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Jura, transmits a response greetings and wishes more gigabytes of pictures of exciting new kinds of good impressions and new acquaintances. :))

07.07.2015 8:06, Yuri Semejkin:

At the request of Irina Nikulina I pass on her greetings to all who know her. Trip a success, a lot of footage, a lot of enthusiasm! So get ready for all interested in viewing, updating, definitely.
And Ira tomorrow a new road for the new material, which is also expected to say much.

07.07.2015 7:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.07.2015 7:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.07.2015 21:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.07.2015 21:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.07.2015 21:32, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Vasily, thank you! I realized that it is necessary for one to hang.

06.07.2015 21:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

06.07.2015 21:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

Autographa gamm?

06.07.2015 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

06.07.2015 20:27, Alexander Belousov:

Female

06.07.2015 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri will join Alexander. The top line is necessary to write the following: ssp. aegrota (Butler, 1877) :)

06.07.2015 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri subspecies can only point you in a specially designated box under the name of the form.

06.07.2015 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema griseola / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

06.07.2015 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema griseola / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

06.07.2015 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not worth it to unite a group of doll and photos of butterflies, and they just had to hang on to the one already existing group with a caterpillar.
I repeat: to merge the two groups can not be ready :)

06.07.2015 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eilema griseola.

06.07.2015 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Eilema griseola / Yuri Semejkin.

06.07.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41234 group.

06.07.2015 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41242 group.

06.07.2015 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

06.07.2015 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

06.07.2015 16:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Eilema griseola

06.07.2015 16:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Eilema griseola. Forgive me, supporters of high-quality images, these things for low-quality product. Still I decided to place due to the absence of others, reflecting the location of caterpillars on a tree trunk. . Here, on a tree trunk was found 5 tracks and all of them were either anywhere, and in the deep and wide enough cracks in the bark. .Looking ahead to say that they were removed and brought to the adults of 2 tracks.

06.07.2015 14:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Eilema griseola aegrota By unfolding pattern identified Chistyakov Yu.A. BPI FEB RAS

06.07.2015 14:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Eilema griseola aegrota By unfolding pattern identified Chistyakov Yu.A. BPI FEB RAS

06.07.2015 14:05, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Ah, again nakosyachil, tracks in a separate group united ... Now I can not combine with butterfly and chrysalis. Please correct.

06.07.2015 13:36, Peter Khramov:

It is not in the gallery, but not the essence. We repaired some time ago.

06.07.2015 8:35, Alexander Belousov:

Yes, no icons pictures. Hiking path to the gallery lost. The last update of the (01/01/1970). Cool glitch!

06.07.2015 6:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same glitch.
I thought I had one like this (((
Peter, a question Yuri support: it is necessary to correct.

06.07.2015 6:01, Yuri Semejkin:

When you click on the Gallery, instead of the usual type is proposed to use the new directory. And yet, when you open a picture with the butterfly climbs inscription - said there is no picture gallery site

05.07.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

05.07.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

05.07.2015 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia russiae / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

05.07.2015 19:11, Peter Khramov:

Transferred?

05.07.2015 17:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena osterodensis / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

05.07.2015 16:39, Fedor Ovechkin:

Zygaena osterodensis

05.07.2015 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, and without it the same editor) Therefore suffered in octogenaria (it's better to be there).

05.07.2015 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hoplodrina blanda / Vasiliy Feoktistov Hoplodrina octogenaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.07.2015 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hoplodrina blanda / Vasiliy Feoktistov Hoplodrina octogenaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.07.2015 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not like she Hoplodrina blanda, I would say N. octogenaria. That's right, more like a octogenaria, than blanda. Especially with a photo editor. Basil is a complex group of reliably only the genitals. And a set of attributes. It is better to hold.

05.07.2015 14:22, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil, and, like the other books: Zhdanko AB Kazenas VL Butterflies Semirechye. There's also PDF.

05.07.2015 14:11, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil you are right! Ask the search words Kazenas VL Zhdanko AB Butterflies: Nymphalidae and satiridy and automatically find! Right!

05.07.2015 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Error deliberately excluded only one thing: that it is a female ("seasoned eggs" straight into the stain) :)
Alexander, look, please define)))

05.07.2015 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chazara prieuri / Igor Ivannikov Chazara enervata / Fedor Ovechkin.

05.07.2015 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chazara prieuri / Igor Ivannikov Chazara enervata / Fedor Ovechkin.

05.07.2015 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chazara prieuri / Igor Ivannikov Chazara enervata / Fedor Ovechkin.

05.07.2015 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chazara prieuri / Igor Ivannikov Chazara enervata / Fedor Ovechkin.

05.07.2015 12:56, Alexander Belousov:

Chazara enervatait. Yesterday collected their local, seen enough! Replica just too small. Fresh live pictures added. On the underside drawing with Chazara prieuri not converge. More reference for comparison - http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/ChazaPrieu.htm.

05.07.2015 12:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

05.07.2015 12:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

05.07.2015 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree that not Chazara prieuri, it is necessary to remove from view, I would like to hear confirmation Chazara enervata

05.07.2015 10:12, Fedor Ovechkin:

I think that the definition of the copies. (photo # 29278 and # 29280) mistake. It does not match any coloring or area;
http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/chazara/
http://www.eurobutterflies.com/sp/prieuri.php
Perhaps itChazara enervata.
The same applies to the copies. on photo # 29281 - # 29282

05.07.2015 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chazara persephone / Confidently identified / Female / Nikolay Grebennikov.

05.07.2015 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chazara persephone / Confidently identified / Female / Nikolay Grebennikov.

05.07.2015 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

05.07.2015 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

05.07.2015 9:42, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I believe that this subspecies Chazara persephone.

05.07.2015 2:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, something you have links kilometer obtained. We must deal with it :)
I recommend to try this thing: http://goo.gl/

04.07.2015 23:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, thank you. Yes I do, if not lёtanny instance, I antennku any break or wing will not bend ... =) That's just completed the swallowtail ... hopefully, normal work.

04.07.2015 22:20, Leon Ortlieb:

Yeah, I know that site. At the time, there is also sent pictures. But he seemed inactive site. Basil there are more birds PhotoHunt, himself a great asset to the other sites.
In my opinion there is not enough specialists ..

04.07.2015 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, keep experimenting, very well turned out, but it is a pity of course, that the flying specimens. Basil, you've got the photo editor eats fine details, and there is no border between the white fringe and the background. I prefer black, but probably need a middle 50% of black :) gray.

04.07.2015 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cupido prosecusa / Leon Ortlieb Celastrina argiolus / Alexander Belousov.

04.07.2015 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cupido prosecusa / Leon Ortlieb Celastrina argiolus / Alexander Belousov.

04.07.2015 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri but the leaves of the trees still possible to try the wild grasses, etc., that have grown close. Propose necessary until such time until you start to eat :) And then feed this plant. In this case only 'by trial and error. " Good luck :)

04.07.2015 20:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

Melanargia russiae

04.07.2015 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri and I about the same, according to the chrysalis of fodder plants or anything can be said, could pripolsti from any other. :) In the family many similar species we probyvat determine. :)

04.07.2015 17:32, Alexander Belousov:

Leon, try to look at our local site nature lovers. There's a good selection of plants. And mushrooms.
http://innature.kz/infusions/advanced_articles_sort/plantae_reg.php

04.07.2015 17:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Out Swallowtail =) Cheers! my first full cycle for a major Rhopalocera butterfly. After unsuccessful altsinoev - very happy)

04.07.2015 16:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks Basil! View not picked up, but with feed acquainted. In general, they are all polyphagous, so perhaps pick up food.

04.07.2015 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lasiocampidae.

04.07.2015 14:57, Yuri Semejkin:

People! Who thinks. Crawling on the ground, so usually before pupation some caterpillars behave, and therefore picked up. Not knowing who it is - with the forage question. Suddenly she still growing. While suggested that next-grown oak, linden.

04.07.2015 14:04, Yuri Semejkin:

With the family in this case no problems. Alexander ! Thank you for your prompt kind, go on it yet, but it looks like he can not handle.
Aft Almost sure it kirkazon since when he took a leaf doll, doll already izvertelsya whole, though spelёnutaya web.
The absence of traces of "bites" of nothing says.Alexander ! You know that before pupation caterpillars stop eating and can move at all on others. Leaves of the plant. Similarly, the bites on the leaves, so go and make out who left them. Te same snail holes do anywhere.
So until vykormlena gusenitsa- fodder plant with a question mark.

04.07.2015 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, you correctly identified the family, genus Arhips, looks like a female, list which was a doll will not go, - forage plant is known to the phone :) hard to see on the monitor will look tomorrow. :)

04.07.2015 13:10, Yuri Semejkin:

What does the list ... Nick! You do texts and comments of authors under the photos you read? Like the Russian language is written, "A copy of the output from the pupa"

04.07.2015 11:41, Nikolay Grebennikov:

but just sat down on the list and all)

04.07.2015 8:37, Yuri Semejkin:

I took a chrysalis and butterfly brought.
I try to determine, did not happen, maybe it can not find or do not know. I Tried "poryt" on a possible host plant kirkazon Manchu, -which we grow in the Primorye Territory, in northeastern China and Korea, but it did no good.All references to sources is found Aristolochia manshuriensis as a food plant of larvae associated with seritsynom and altsinoem +3 beetle. And yet! About tortricidae word. If the caterpillars of this butterfly is nothing but kirkazona not eat, the definition of the imago becomes problematic.

04.07.2015 8:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Possible caterpillar host plant Aristolochia manshuriensis (kirkazon Manchu)

04.07.2015 1:02, Leon Ortlieb:

About what I know. But there is a problem in detail. Some plants are determined without difficulty, and other small problem ..

04.07.2015 0:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Leon! By plant is recommended to handle here http://www.plantarium.ru/

04.07.2015 0:56, Leon Ortlieb:

Alexander,
If you look at the book of Kazakhstan Animals in photos
AB Zhdanko, VL Kazenas (PDF)
Butterflies Semirechye, the Minerva is much darker. This butterfly looks like a few butterflies, but one to one with anyone .. Where is the boundary permissible deviations?
a alatauica on different sites for different looks, too ..And now what standard?
Although I doubt it alatauica ..

04.07.2015 0:38, Leon Ortlieb:

In this edition (in Kazakhstan)
Butterflies:
Nymphalidae and Satiridy http://antvid.org/Kazenas/PDF/Publ%202/2013%20%D0%96%D0%B4%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE,%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81_%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BC%D1%84%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B4%D1%8B%20%D0%B8%20%D0%A1%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B4%D1%8B.pdf

there are similar to str.64-65

03.07.2015 21:02, Leon Ortlieb:

Clear. Alexander, then you can biologist, botanist? I have a bunch of plants, you need to define ... There's a "my" former forestry whatnot tebovalos be defined ..

03.07.2015 19:23, Peter Khramov:

Photos in the admin can lie for a long time. Therefore, God bless him, let it be superfluous writings, tea is not for every fifth fotoy ...

03.07.2015 17:13, Alexander Belousov:

This is also on Mellicta alatauica not like, rather itMelitaea britomartis

03.07.2015 17:10, Alexander Belousov:

Leon, I am just a fan like you. I think it is more similar to Melitaea minerva.

03.07.2015 16:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

I looked at the phone, plagued by doubts, but difficult to see. to look at the monitor output.

03.07.2015 15:39, Leon Ortlieb:

Alexander, thank you!
Next task is loaded!

03.07.2015 15:32, Alexander Belousov:

Leon, I identified these signs: background wing uniformly gray, no blue plaque. All spots and veins isolated light piping (stroke). Size is also smaller. Something like that.

03.07.2015 15:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia suasa / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.07.2015 15:11, Leon Ortlieb:

Thank you, Alexander !!
They are very similar .. please explain what are they different? And as a fellow countryman, please, help determine the checkered with Cox, it seems to me it alatavskaya .. Later lay ..

03.07.2015 14:49, Yuri Semejkin:

I am writing at the request of Ira. Everyone sends greetings. Regarding mites were today botsade..Iru they seem to escape from myself 7 pieces removed. New butterflies like it is not removed, but tomorrow Ira goes to the village. Tiger in Anisimovka. Here it should shoot. So expect the new butterflies.

03.07.2015 14:39, Alexander Belousov:

Celastrina argiolusit.

03.07.2015 14:31, Basil Sergienko:

suasa

03.07.2015 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.07.2015 13:10, Leon Ortlieb:

Even this morning, tried, did not work it was, was a glitch .. Now, yes, that's right .. I ask apologies, something it was not so in the morning ..

Another question: It is advisable or desirable to attach a photo of the habitat where the sfotat butterfly?

03.07.2015 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Leon foty when downloading, the program will work and synonyms, and Russian title. You can now go to the download section and in the "name of the species" or enter Inachis io Peacock - it will work autosubstitution, click on them (drop-down line), and all, the name is displayed to the accepted online.But if you enter the name, but autosubstitution not used, only then will glitch, more prog finds that you are entering a new kind, not the old analogue.

03.07.2015 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

0piska author photo, the underside of the photo 33314, it would be necessary sayazat. but that's obvious. :)

03.07.2015 12:16, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil, "we must gruzitt these types directly" out of form "."
In my opinion it is not quite a good solution. For example: I was able to define a synonym Inachis io, or the like Is set in a search engine, does not work!

Like thousands of other users on the site to find it? (Well there peacock .. And there are more complicated).
I do not have a problem and do not suffer, if someone will correct ..But this extra fuss you .. And if there is no willing to improve ..
I think rather it was used, so there synonym (or outdated), or even led to the Russian NAME accepted online ..
(This is not a criticism, but just thinking out loud ..)

03.07.2015 11:47, Shamil Murtazin:

And you look http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4827
So it is this butterfly as the photo. Just most of it around the environment is too bright to see the good parts.
And when shooting on a white background metering a white paper will not eliminates, exposure shortens. That's the result of "dark matter".

03.07.2015 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

03.07.2015 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

03.07.2015 2:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In fact, it's almost kind of a black butterfly: http://insectamo.ru/component/content/article/98-hete/noctuidae/1239-aedia-funesta
And black background is in my view irrelevant. The same, however as white butterfly on a white .....
There simply oblёtany copies. in my opinion, and so on a black background it is clear :) And "as cut" from the fact that there are no shadows)
That's from my balcony (I usually have it and mass): http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 41161 and so it looks really)

03.07.2015 1:20, Peter Khramov:

Something here looks like something is wrong. On the edges of butterflies some glitches with this approach, as they cut (but of course, that nobody cut).

02.07.2015 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not know why.
Fixed

02.07.2015 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

02.07.2015 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

02.07.2015 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.07.2015 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For me as more onLacanobia oleraceashe pulls) We'll wait for another opinion.

02.07.2015 23:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Why is there one group tracks Didyma? ..)

02.07.2015 23:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Lacanobia suasa?

02.07.2015 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And my regards to the whole honorable company :)))
"Sumnichayu")
And from ticks and other bloodsucking brethren should use repellent agent with a maximum of diethyl toluamide (DEET): https: //ru.wikipedia.org / wiki / Diethyltoluamide
What there spoke, but DEET is still the most effective protection against this scourge)))
In short, Irina, good luck))) Well, wait for the wonderful photos of butterflies)

02.07.2015 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, if you can do that, please, so that photos of butterflies that are in the admin panel (moderated) were visible to moderators (those who have access to the admin panel). All other users until these photos will not be removed from the admin should not be seen in any way, neither as a "type undefined" ..... at all.In order not to recur definitions as in the case with this photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41158
In my opinion it would be better and avoid unnecessary scribbling under the photo)))

02.07.2015 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well today admin checked)))
Leon, and in this case it was not necessary to write in the line of the form: (Melanargia galathea Linnaeus, 1767) Even in parentheses (((
We had to just write Melanargia galathea and nothing more. Or download the "out of form")))

02.07.2015 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, what about space. This is not an isolated case. Here is a picture: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/41035 also landed in the admin area because it was uploaded as a Pyrameis atalanta .This Trouble I caught on time, but with the eye of a peacock that is not spotted Yuri managed to re-define :)))
I think not in the blank here is, namely, writing one of the synonyms (the old name) instead of the core, which is made on the site.

02.07.2015 21:23, Peter Khramov:

The method, which is described Vasily, it is currently working. Ho. Of course, you can upload synonymous and the main download page ph, all will be the norm. In your case, Leon, it is not attached to the form, as It was an extra space in the name you specified. In general, the program should be easy to remove this gap, but as long as she does not know how. Because.

02.07.2015 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, in order to avoid similar Trouble necessary gruzitt these types directly "out of form", and not to inscribe the name of their own. The algorithm is as follows:
1) is located on the site with the help of search (row in the right upper corner) type, which you want to upload photos.2) According to the link that appears open gallery type and right at the bottom click on the "Submit your picture of this kind of butterfly"
This will download a form where you enter all but the species name. (Taken at the site is already there will be)
3) Upload photos and it will rise to where it should without unnecessary "gibberish")))

02.07.2015 20:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pontia edusa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.07.2015 20:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pontia edusa.

02.07.2015 20:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.07.2015 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

02.07.2015 19:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Abrostola triplasia Abrostola tripartita.

02.07.2015 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Nikolay Grebennikov.

02.07.2015 19:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Nikolay Grebennikov.

02.07.2015 19:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Coscinia striata / Confidently identified / Male / Nikolay Grebennikov.

02.07.2015 18:37, Basil Sergienko:

In fact, it A.tripartita

02.07.2015 18:27, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you. Just before the end of the method worked. It is necessary to shoot in RAW and then at the dark part of the film development to drive to black and black. And as the background was a dark matter, it becomes completely black.
Not all butterflies it works, some very dark colors on the wings.

02.07.2015 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2015 17:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Coscinia striata / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.07.2015 17:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Coscinia striata / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.07.2015 16:54, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Spiris striata male.

02.07.2015 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Hello and back. And wish that no ticks tama!

02.07.2015 12:01, Alexander Belousov:

Great shot! Thick black background. Good detail and focus. It is necessary to me, too, to buy a camera.

02.07.2015 11:22, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, it would be necessary, of course, to clarify, but not in time)) I am writing now with the companies Jura Semeykina)) all heartfelt greetings to the DV-open spaces !!! )

02.07.2015 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Leon Ortlieb.

02.07.2015 9:00, Leon Ortlieb:

Basil, yes, the famous butterfly.
Since I do not know by heart the Latin, but the name of the Russian good, then took the Latin Wikipedia Inachis io https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B7. Here on the site between the above named Latin names is a sign of equality .. I mean the same thing.
Why it was not certain?

01.07.2015 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, something is transferred lay not as it should. It seems to me that this species was known ochenm have you defined? Maybe not as loaded butterfly Aglais io, but as Vanessa io or Inachis io, and because of this got into the indefinite?

01.07.2015 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Leon Ortlieb Aglais io / Yuri Semejkin.

01.07.2015 16:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Normal Aglais io (Linnaeus, 1758)

01.07.2015 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.07.2015 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.07.2015 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

01.07.2015 9:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41144 group.

30.06.2015 21:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! LAST long search I found: Zolotukhin VV Ryabov SA 2012. Raznousye lepidoptera Vietnam. Sem. Hawk moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Ulyanovsk: "The Corporation of Promotion." 240.

30.06.2015 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dining with 41144

30.06.2015 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

precise definition, but the phone can not fix.

30.06.2015 14:29, Alex Dumchus:

Hybrids gelikonis, see my photos hybrids, hang in uncertain

30.06.2015 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Irina, thank you.

30.06.2015 13:34, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syntomoides imaon / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.06.2015 11:17, Peter Khramov:

To judge it is currently possible, and sometimes necessary. It being understood that everything could be completely different, more complete information we do not have.

30.06.2015 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, I have no idea where to get the kind of Notonagemia Zolotuhin & Ryabov, 2012
Another year and a half ago (when your downloaded) here: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/m_ana.htm he stood in the old Meganoton Boisduval, [1875]
It may prompt some more bases that are in "Sources" , except Pittaveya site? Understand here necessary.

30.06.2015 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Meganoton analis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

30.06.2015 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Meganoton analis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

30.06.2015 5:32, Evgeny Komarov:

Notonagemia analis analis (R. Felder, [1874])

30.06.2015 2:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, then say so, "double-edged sword." A man with whom you are acquainted himself quite a peculiar person to think that he is "white and fluffy", and had been treated incorrectly. It seems to me that the owners probably had a good reason.I remember this man since the mid-1990s, even under the old "bird" (which was Kalitnikah) when he's selling collectible butterflies .... So that it is not for us to judge who's done correctly (most likely this was are any the background).

30.06.2015 1:05, Irina Nikulina:

Syntomiini. Coming soon likely,Syntomoides imaon(It often occurs as a Ceryx imaon) Or someone else from Ceryx)

30.06.2015 0:08, Peter Khramov:

And whatever it is it could be ...

29.06.2015 20:54, Peter Khramov:

Familiar with the person who created the whole thing (and a tropical pavilion and the Museum of insects, and minerals). According to him, the owners of the park behaved very correctly (read - *******), in connection with which he had to stop working with them. Offhand, the replacement of qualified staff was not there, and everything started to decline.Now you have found someone or something there at all now - not a banner. But, perhaps, I will not go on principle.
However, without a car there is generally nothing to do, you will die before get there.

29.06.2015 16:35, Irina Nikulina:

In Hungary, the Garden of the Budapest Zoo (one of the favorite places in the city, I did the zoo never seen!)) A butterfly garden I have something to compare, at the time was in Shёnbrunnskom Garden of Vienna and in a couple of French Languedoc -Russilone.Those greatly impressed everyone - and plenty of species of butterflies, and the freshness and especially recreated natural environment. So Hungary is not worse), except that the smaller size. Many butterflies, all clean, oblёtannyh minimum species counted about ok.40.Nothing artificial - all the flowers, plants, live trees, beautiful, well-groomed) Sorry, not on vacation was och.korotkaya trip for, but it would still be there took off) in Moscow 100 years was not only when it first opened - Then it was a sad spectacle (... do not know what is there now.By the way, very much a huge pavilion Tropical Bird Park in Vorobyov! Plant excellent condition! Talk to those who served him, like there were going to breed butterflies .. I do not know, Peter?

29.06.2015 15:13, Yuri Semejkin:

All butterflies birth climb down, or sideways in the horizontal or inclined position pupa.
A pavlinoglazki seems over the top vylazit manage? There was nothing yet to change, since the caterpillar cocoon chose this location. And naturally, as the cocoons are hanging.

29.06.2015 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Interior does not see this obletannost and neighboring fote quite a obletannost. In Moscow if the time to get there, everything will be buzzing with obletannostyu. But with the size of the room interiors, variety of species - so, problem.But if we compare with the Nizhny Novgorod, where I was in a regular room carried a special live attendants in envelopes (Che them to fly in vain?), In Moscow still hoo! Although HH was also room for Pobol, but in the dungeons.

29.06.2015 14:14, Alexander Belousov:

It is worth to them busy! Beauty!

29.06.2015 14:12, Peter Khramov:

KrosavEts!

29.06.2015 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

29.06.2015 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

29.06.2015 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

29.06.2015 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Goodia thia / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

29.06.2015 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Goodia.htm through all four options and in my opinion, too, the first option is most suitable. I pretend and put in inaccurate G.thia

29.06.2015 13:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Wait!

29.06.2015 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura iris / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.06.2015 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura iris / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.06.2015 13:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Apatura iris (Linnaeus, 1758)

29.06.2015 13:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Apatura iris (Linnaeus, 1758). Forage Salix taraikensis

29.06.2015 12:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Rhode Goodia Holland, 1893. Most likely G.thia (Jordan, 1922), but there are three similar - G. obscuripennis (Strand, 1913), G. lunata (Holland, 1893), G. egeri (Bouyer, 2009) - it is known to me externally.

29.06.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They probably all usual))
And judging by the interior design and neoblёtannosti there the inhabitants of which are shown in the photo - our gardens to theirs "as the moon" .....
Irina, thank you for these wonderful photos :))

29.06.2015 2:46, Peter Khramov:

Wow, Hungarians and gardens with flowers and butterflies are found ...

29.06.2015 1:02, Irina Nikulina:

Heliconius erato?

29.06.2015 0:59, Irina Nikulina:

Heliconius melpomene?

28.06.2015 20:23, Gleba Basil: This species is identified correctly.

28.06.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In uploading the picture. In this phrase:
"Whatever you did not download the photo, be sure to read basic requirements for photographs on our website ."

28.06.2015 19:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Costive there ... little details. Where reference to the terms located?

28.06.2015 17:51, Peter Khramov:

People who adds infu about the kinds of the site (the flight of time, geography, stuff like that) if you have a choice, please first add the data for the species in which the site has illustration.

28.06.2015 17:43, Peter Khramov:

Lord! For some types of obvious signs of "overflow" and "translucency".If anyone has the appropriate types of collections, or who already knows - write, pliz, on the pages of the relevant species, say, an overflow in color (as in perelivnits, morphine and other Maak) and / or (semi) transparency (such as It has sesiidae), so I can the matter more precisely formalize.

28.06.2015 17:41, Peter Khramov:

It has a scroll bar (for a list of meaning rather than a page). Accordingly, twist it and get all the other family. Also, do not forget to use the feature "Custom taxon." Often it is more convenient than a family from the list.

28.06.2015 16:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Yasnenko! Then another question for families. List of families end Sesiidae. This is just me, or so it seems others have not yet made the family?

28.06.2015 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I had seen it ... But such variations brown at first saw)

28.06.2015 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And something I hesitated. Confused in them (

28.06.2015 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, No, like properly defined.

28.06.2015 13:21, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, this option has long been planned. But first, you must realize the possibility of its formalization. In general, the idea is correct, we do.
With regards to the chain - the chain does not need, and just being able to select your options.Just like now, we do not sample chain family-Region, and the choice of the family and the region at the same time or in any order.

28.06.2015 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.06.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.06.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.06.2015 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.06.2015 5:48, Yuri Semejkin:

I propose to introduce a new parameter to the catalog -Korma. In the first place it would facilitate the search for the "small things" such -Listovёrtki, moths and others. Intelligibility of information on them like a little, and among the small butterflies might have monophages and feed which are limited.
For example: We grow tortricidae with velvet Amur.In an Internet snapshot found no clear or understood. Enter keyword -Barhat Amur - growing in Russia in the Far East. . Search area species of small butterflies once narrowed by facilitating the search. Of course a number of species of caterpillar food supply possible wider.But it is necessary to clarify Probably many have faced when often - in the entomological literature in the name of fodder is born, and then sp.
I believe that setting Forage, not immediately, but will start to work. ....
It does not interfere with the presence of a chain-Family Region ------ ----- Foods
It is clear that the region proizrostaniya plant should also be limited and not widespread.

28.06.2015 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

AlsoAutographa jota?

28.06.2015 0:27, Peter Khramov:

For the formal parameter "color" the following changes:
1. Instead of three colors - brown, gray and black uniform entered the brown / gray / chery since their perception of it in the case of butterflies is very subjective. These colors have been replaced.
2. Added okolotsvetovye features: overflow ("metallic" coloring perelivnits, Maak, etc.) And transparency (transparent or semi-transparent wings, for example, sesiidae). Transparency and overflow until the bear, but soon will be affixed.
3. The color attributes are now two, separately for the top and underside of the wings.

27.06.2015 23:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

Boloria dia?

27.06.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Celerio euphordidae Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.06.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena proboscidalis / Confidently identified / Celerio euphordidae.

27.06.2015 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Spilosoma lubricipeda / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.06.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tethea ocularis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.06.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rivula sericealis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.06.2015 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Spilosoma lutea / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.06.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

27.06.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colias croceus / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

27.06.2015 23:10, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. crocea

27.06.2015 23:10, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. argus, male

27.06.2015 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Erannis defoliaria / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2015 22:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mesapamea, to type only drugs genitals.

27.06.2015 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea dimidiata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2015 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis rivularis / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

27.06.2015 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa pulchrina Autographa jota.

27.06.2015 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa pulchrina Autographa jota.

27.06.2015 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa pulchrina Autographa jota.

27.06.2015 22:31, Peter Khramov:

By the way: there is no set "Wingspan" In my opinion it should be added.
Basil option added.

27.06.2015 22:30, Peter Khramov:

link to FAQs Wrapper Joomla! photo and all
There http://lepidoptera.ru/terms, although it may need to be something and supplemented.

27.06.2015 22:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra pyramidea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2015 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra pyramidea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2015 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura ilia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2015 22:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura ilia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2015 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aedia funesta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2015 22:10, Peter Khramov:

Duc, Dim, upload, download!

27.06.2015 22:09, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, changed.

27.06.2015 21:58, Irina Nikulina:

There were doubts about their definitions of 2-year-old ... Sasha, look, please do not jota whether it still # 23288. At the same time, and today metallovidok - too long to put inaccurate.

27.06.2015 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shirley Sekarajasingham Fedor Ovechkin.

27.06.2015 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapeta hamana / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

27.06.2015 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pasiphila rectangulata.

27.06.2015 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

27.06.2015 21:30, Fedor Ovechkin:

Agapeta hamana

27.06.2015 21:16, Irina Nikulina:

Dioryctria sp. From 4 to 8 dwelling reg tend toDioryctria schuetzeella(doubt between her and abietella. There is no certainty that the site is correct definitions schuetzeella)

27.06.2015 20:29, Basil Sergienko:

Pasiphila rectangula

27.06.2015 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

27.06.2015 17:38, Fedor Ovechkin:

https://www.google.ru/maps/place/7514.+Sk.+No:9,+%C4%B0stiklal,+80020+Osmaniye+Merkez%2FOsmaniye,+%D0%A2%D1%83%D1%80%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F/@60.9524192,76.8474501,286m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x152f2028586ace37:0xeadf3c868a4d6ecf?hl=ru

27.06.2015 14:33, Yuri Semejkin:

The new point

27.06.2015 12:44, Yuri Semejkin:

After a day.

27.06.2015 12:22, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry like verbs, they are so easy to type on fote not determined. All right, Dim or not I even remember?

27.06.2015 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

27.06.2015 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, waiting for the butterfly-that-be sure.

27.06.2015 5:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Rhodinia fugax (Butler, 1877)

27.06.2015 1:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Not Rhodinia jankowskii, but rather Rhodinia fugax, if you look at Kurentsova. Yesterday pupate, cocoon of yellowish-green, and for feed converges Quercus mongolica. It remains to wait for a butterfly to the final verdict.

26.06.2015 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.06.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.06.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.06.2015 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2015 22:46, Leon Ortlieb:

Diaethria clymena?

26.06.2015 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39251 group.

26.06.2015 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

26.06.2015 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

26.06.2015 21:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

SPECIFIED: a specific article, a particular journal, author. I'm online only subsequent journal found possible without the article itself to specify only the output, but also in the kind of synonyms. :(
but it is better to make now, and then later forget :).

26.06.2015 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Holloway, 2010 One word .....
The wait is necessary in my opinion ....

26.06.2015 19:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

At the same time, the head chukha. :)
The Moths of Borneo: Family Noctuidae, subfamilies Pantheinae (part), Bagisarinae, Acontiinae, Aediinae, Eustrotiinae, Bryophilinae, Araeopteroninae, Aventiinae, Eublemminae and further miscellaneous genera. Malayan Nature Journal, 62 (1-2), Mar 2010: 1-240. [Zoological Record Volume 146]

26.06.2015 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I also have no idea where to take the form (
Yes, and it seems kind of have to start ....

26.06.2015 17:33, Irina Nikulina:

All finished writing, thank you, Sasha. And Paul, thanks for the definition. Revised set before summer Furcula, doubts also arose, did not have time to ask around. But under Bohr flew dozens of these a week - will determine the training, all are not LW)) In general, a surprising number of the summer, despite the weather, so we will fill up the site)

25.06.2015 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Smerinthus caecus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.06.2015 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plemyria rubiginata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.06.2015 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plemyria rubiginata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.06.2015 21:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For me Achaea serva

25.06.2015 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thera obeliscata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.06.2015 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thera obeliscata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.06.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Swamp near as in my case it will be. Always I see simply never collected ...

25.06.2015 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

?

25.06.2015 21:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I've noticed that it does not happen every year (in the year was not).

25.06.2015 21:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It. This year, a lot of it.

25.06.2015 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm in shock))) (see. The author's comment). It flies in peace in a 20-minute walk from the entrance, and yet sort of disappeared from the region (B-zero)))))
"Places detection Balashikha , Dmitrov and Shatura district tries are located in protected areas." ...... No there are no protected areas or It never was.
More: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/16818 (it should read gelgrafiyu picture).People make up these books interesting to do something even though there are sometimes in the woods?
No words....

25.06.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thera obeliscata?

25.06.2015 18:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

It was a random error, not the window put Atypha pulmonaris, I apologize :)

25.06.2015 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

25.06.2015 18:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

I look at the preparations of the genitals. :) In appearance, several discussions have been on mobiole in stelchatkah, but I did not get 100% correctly identified by appearance, even straightened tridens / psi.

25.06.2015 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, it is not necessary. Very interesting in their own territories to find))
A banal in my understanding there are devoid of distinctiveness, the usual. What can be said about this in any way as a))

25.06.2015 17:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Atypha pulmonaris Dicycla oo.

25.06.2015 17:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dicycla oo Atypha pulmonaris.

25.06.2015 16:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I can dial 100 pieces of each type if necessary)))

25.06.2015 16:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Banana is a popular type.

25.06.2015 14:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, do not swear))) The word "banana" for me, anyway, that the mat) Somewhere in common, and in some cases not)))
In my edges usually only Tethea ocularis: here it is full of the light flies, and Batis and now this close to Moscow is not very much and meet (((.

25.06.2015 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By the way, I will support the reliability of the determination cuspis / tridens / psi- to look ???

25.06.2015 14:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Wild banalshina, as well as Thyatira batis (Linnaeus, 1758) and Tethea ocularis (Linnaeus, 1767)

25.06.2015 12:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For the first time in my life I met this sovkovidku. She flew the only one among the crowd.
I do not know how much it is rare or common, but in my opinion butterfly extraordinary beauty)))
Dumchus to Alexander. And you say, "Serota" (((
There are also our "Pearl")))

25.06.2015 11:03, Fedor Ovechkin:

##Crambus perlella##

24.06.2015 21:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Their interesting.
Eggs PodaliriusIphiclides podalirius
Newly-laid capsules



And before leaving gusyanki. Even the bristles on the caterpillar viewed =)

24.06.2015 21:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I forgot) (((

24.06.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, pretend. Then you will know better)))

24.06.2015 16:33, Gleb Ivanov: This species is identified correctly.

24.06.2015 16:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What I "gathering dust" !!! Even certain!

24.06.2015 14:30, Leon Ortlieb:

Heliconius melpomene lucinda ?

24.06.2015 14:23, Leon Ortlieb:

Erateina staudingeri ?

24.06.2015 14:00, Leon Ortlieb:

Eueides tales? or close to it?

24.06.2015 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah))) And how many more of these bins for the people gathering dust. Scary to think .....

24.06.2015 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Daddala lucilla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Daddala lucilla

24.06.2015 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Erebus gemmans / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tyana marina

24.06.2015 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Isana albiscripta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tyana marina

24.06.2015 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cechenena aegrota / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cechenena aegrota / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Isana albiscripta Holloway, 2008

24.06.2015 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39250 group.

24.06.2015 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ambulyx jordani / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ambulyx jordani / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochrotrigona praetextata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.06.2015 9:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tyana marina

24.06.2015 9:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tyana marina

24.06.2015 9:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

nolida Tyana marina

24.06.2015 8:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes eksklyuzivchik network)))

24.06.2015 1:04, Peter Khramov:

To assess the situation with what? ..

23.06.2015 22:00, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Oh thanks! The more interesting! I watched the photo on this page the determination, but for some reason decided that I C. pamphilus.

23.06.2015 21:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ochrotrigona praetextata [Hering 1903]

23.06.2015 21:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

like Theretra indistincta (Butler, 1877)

23.06.2015 21:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ambulyx jordani (Bethune-Baker, 1910)

23.06.2015 21:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ambulyx jordani (Bethune-Baker, 1910)

23.06.2015 21:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

killed Cechenena aegrota (Butler, 1875)

23.06.2015 21:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Metaemene circumpunctata Holloway 2010

23.06.2015 20:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

its the same defined in the week

23.06.2015 20:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

the view is not defined

23.06.2015 19:43, Shamil Murtazin:

I offer separate from the list species found in only one region. This can be either the edge of the area (and not the fact that the species remains in the region), or endemic.
It makes a real assessment of the situation.

23.06.2015 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Duc is the case, female. Dmitry, what's the question?

23.06.2015 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It looks like the first photo in Google :) Or will one of the first ....
Quickly they index (already there).
Dmitry, if not a secret where naryl something?

23.06.2015 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catephia xylosis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.06.2015 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catephia xylosis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.06.2015 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Daddala lucilla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.06.2015 16:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7360
It is necessary to feed the plants to correct my gaffe.
Trite forgot to switch the keyboard layout (((
After fodder plant Highlander in brackets is necessary to make it Polygonum , instead of gibberish that I got)))

23.06.2015 15:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catephia xylosis Prout, 1925

23.06.2015 15:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Daddala lucilla

23.06.2015 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The ends of the bright, broad wings. Simplicia schaldusalis for me. Yes, and zigzags on the top are just at it

23.06.2015 15:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xenochroa?

23.06.2015 15:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Erebus gemmans (Guenée, 1852) ???

23.06.2015 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put in inaccurate .... Alexander, you look it, please.
I'm a little afraid of the two girlfriends (second psi))))

23.06.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.06.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.06.2015 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenonympha pamphilus / Vladimir Bryukhov Coenonympha tullia / Eugene Karolinskiy.

23.06.2015 0:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Coenonympha pamphilus / Vladimir Bryukhov Coenonympha tullia / Eugene Karolinskiy.

22.06.2015 23:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. tullia

22.06.2015 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think it's better to let pobudet fastsellinah inaccurate. Numerous finds that in those places directly point to this))
Pity then that the caterpillar has not taken on removal ......

22.06.2015 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gynaephora selenitica / Confidently identified Dicallomera fascelina / Tentatively identified.

22.06.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is also our .. And this same dear :) He lives in an apartment next door to the man :) It is not a natural butterfly ....

22.06.2015 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is ours, dear :)

22.06.2015 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglossa pinguinalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.06.2015 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Peribatodes rhomboidaria / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

22.06.2015 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula flaccidaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gortyna borelii / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 21:45, Basil Sergienko:

Peribatodes rhomboidaria

22.06.2015 21:44, Basil Sergienko:

Scopula flaccidaria

22.06.2015 21:43, Basil Sergienko:

Gortyna borelii

22.06.2015 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For Vladimir Bryukhova. Released today, here's this girl. So, watch out for her)))

22.06.2015 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calophasia lunula / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calamia tridens / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.06.2015 19:56, Basil Sergienko:

Phragmatobia fuliginosa

22.06.2015 19:54, Basil Sergienko:

Calophasia lunula

22.06.2015 19:54, Basil Sergienko:

Calamia tridens

22.06.2015 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Furcula bicuspis Furcula furcula.

22.06.2015 15:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, please put in comments the author: Determine Pavel Morozov mobiol http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235476&view=findpost&p=1538887
and subspecies Furcula furcula sangaica.

22.06.2015 15:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, please put in comments the author: Determine Pavel Morozov mobiol http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235476&view=findpost&p=1538887 and subspecies Furcula furcula sangaica.

22.06.2015 15:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Furcula bicuspis / Irina Nikulina Furcula furcula / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.06.2015 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, of course, an interesting topic might be)))
And always happy to share their personal findings and recommendations in this respect (something which I have).Not only that: recently even begun to earn a living, "fuss" with someone else's material)
Only here for one thing: the site are very few people working directly with the material: collection, raspravka, registration of entomological collections, etc. There are mostly photographers in nature.So, there is no assurance that the topic will be continued (((
While I am writing in places where questions arise in this respect.

22.06.2015 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, so be it)))

22.06.2015 11:23, Peter Khramov:

Basil, what arguments. These are two different pictures. And that might be enough and one - at another question.

22.06.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, no one will playing))) just visual perception is different.
And why should there be such here neponyatok would be desirable simply to hear the arguments of the author in this regard ......

22.06.2015 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius erato / Tentatively identified / Leon Ortlieb.

22.06.2015 10:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I did not quite understand the question. There is no doubt that these are different images? So they are very different background which photographed the butterfly. At least look at the bright spot over her, one comes to the bottom of the list for all spot on another 40,794, less than half. 100% different. I was even hard to imagine that you are with Peter I was not kidding. :))

22.06.2015 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Momentary thing. Only Alexander, believe excite grounds under which you came to such conclusions. You have access to EXIF ​​image? Although (for me at least) a second chamber are not listed.))) I see as a double. Although, to view the other was something there)))

22.06.2015 9:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Homemade to store irrelevant. But the topic is very interesting, Basil, create a new topic and share their experiences. I think anyone would be interested. :))

22.06.2015 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40794 group.

22.06.2015 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis betuletana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.06.2015 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis betuletana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.06.2015 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, from homemade in this case, there is a very big plus. It made a tool that will work itself "under his hand" so to speak.
I do not know: it's like someone. But I was always more convenient to work with his instrument: Hand over time get used to it)))

22.06.2015 9:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis daphne / Confidently identified / Gleba Basil.

22.06.2015 9:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is not doubles, two different photos of one copy. It is necessary to unite the group. :)

22.06.2015 9:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas sylvata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.06.2015 3:01, Peter Khramov:

Yes, Poles also have a needle with replaceable nozzles.
And about the homemade can be endlessly discussed. Someone is cheaper to do it yourself (and even like the case), someone's cheaper to buy, and to do nothing.

21.06.2015 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

No new and old taxonomy. There taxon feisthamelii. Some interpret it as a species, others as a subspecies. All their arguments. It was originally described as a species in the genus Papilio, this author should be put in brackets. I have a question I do not know and do not stick to one of the parties does not.

21.06.2015 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Peter. It's an easy and correct needle in general.
There she had two drawbacks:
1. Too short tip (not always convenient).
2. Too high a price, and it is necessary to have in the arsenal of a set of needles with different length and configuration of the tip for all occasions. Scary to think how much it will result .....(((
Here's one of my favorite hendmeydov for Krupnyakov butterflies and almost all the beetles which is convenient to work and the only thing that is purchased for the manufacture of 1 pin №3 :)
Little by little the collet taken, it served its compass (probably lying around the house many) + handle machined on the sandpaper of euonymus (very sturdy and light wood)which is growing in our woods :) Thanks collet can be easily and quickly change the sting on the essentials.
But how to make a thicker pin to her pinched collet - minute deal. It removed a piece of insulation from the wiring and podzhodyaschego instead of the core pin is inserted.

In .... I have a circle of "Skillful hands" to open))))

21.06.2015 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxyodes scrobiculata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.06.2015 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxyodes scrobiculata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.06.2015 21:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oxyodes scrobiculata (Fabricius, 1775)

21.06.2015 21:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oxyodes scrobiculata (Fabricius, 1775)

21.06.2015 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

21.06.2015 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna congrua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.06.2015 19:07, Peter Khramov:

If the puncture, it can be seen, yes ...

21.06.2015 17:58, Alex Dumchus:

Anyway punctures in the veins are visible, but when you use wood-No.

21.06.2015 17:18, Peter Khramov:

From dissecting needles here are good: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1711. Just stand like an airplane (the price listed on the site at the old rate, the new purchase will be more expensive) Yes and no nifiga them in stock. Easy. Pleasant. Very sharp / tokie (especially with small butterflies clearly visible).
ZYBasil, raspravilki were at a discount (do not do it yourself, just pokotsanye at the corners, for it is almost irrelevant, but the aesthetics / presentation spoiled). But everything has gone.
The only thing that now appeared elongated raspravilki the price of conventional-plus from balsa and plastazota can make a discount.

21.06.2015 15:59, Alex Dumchus:

I do not use prep.igly. For raspravki sharpened using a zero on the end of a chopstick, only to be hardwood, once brought from Vietnam. So less scratched wings. And I do raspravilki of parketin- excellent geometry, top PVC glue.

21.06.2015 15:53, Alex Dumchus:

Pts. nalovlennyh similar to mine in Mexico, identified as H.erato

21.06.2015 15:50, Alexander Belousov:

Basil, it's just an option. If the hand was used, the graft of three millimeters Feel the even. And at the expense of needles (!!!) very interesting. And I do not like the factory. :-)

21.06.2015 15:46, Alex Dumchus:

Zaprsto stuff. Give the same Stradomsky make comparative genetics of both species (subspecies). What kinds of blues, he has closed.

21.06.2015 14:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, so surely every master his instrument and each right :) so what hand he used to. For example: I can not enjoy the purchase-dissecting needles: use a reverse stick end (where the head was renshe) in a wooden handle entomobulavku №3, or simply entobulavku №3 without handles.And these raspravilkam arm also used to and therefore do not want to split hairs))) Everyone here its shorter)))

21.06.2015 13:30, Alexander Belousov:

Basil, I did pravilki laminate floor that stele. Just over PVC glue - 3mm for coins, 5 mm larger (buy there, where everything is for the production of advertising). When good hands turn at all glamor for micro-pravilki even entirely of plastic.Povehnosti his smooth, puncture holes remain without splitting (do not stick out and do not cling). After just wear the glue on top of a layer of more plastic, and all!
https://fotki.yandex.ru/next/users/alex242242/album/474793/view/1103886

21.06.2015 13:12, Alexander Belousov:

Simpotyashki.

21.06.2015 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Appear Alexander))) Until recently, the subspecies was.
You look back and push back ....
"The movement can be both forward and backward"

21.06.2015 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, an hour no products from the category make / repair itself? :)
In particular, a pair of pads are required to raspravilku or little strips of balsa.
Raspravilok favor of two types:
From an array of limes on personal observations better suited for small things.
With plates of balsa for butterflies bigger.So: this is the balsa is certainly a useful thing and pins in it come any and how to ......
But it wears out pretty quickly ((
Do not change the same because of this whole raspravilku? Sew lining the new stick.
Do not we have reached to a level to simply throw out the good stuff)))

21.06.2015 9:16, Alex Dumchus:

It's a shame. There are still interesting species in the Europe.

21.06.2015 7:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

20.06.2015 22:33, Peter Khramov:

Et I'm not the one, where will it.

20.06.2015 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas sylvata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.06.2015 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tortrix viridana / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.06.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tortrix viridana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.06.2015 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And where will it? The group is now to put what?
So Makar, and I and my navorocheno)))

20.06.2015 20:14, Peter Khramov:

Tediousness for: kropnutyh - at yes, a double floor, otherwise the cropped - at no longer double, extra floor has a picture of the same individual ...

20.06.2015 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tortrix viridana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.06.2015 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Otherwise, double cropped photo # 40794

20.06.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Abraxas sylvata.

20.06.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.06.2015 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas sylvata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.06.2015 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, on such sites can not be determined.
There is a theme which is regularly laid out links that really can help to identify: http: // lepidoptera.ru / community / 2328
And all of these shops can not be trusted in any case: it can easily be called a mouse elephant (metaphorically) and then buy it without question :)
Terias is invalid genus name Eurema
On bringing to type worth the wait. Very difficult race in which many seemingly similar species.

20.06.2015 18:35, Leon Ortlieb:

heliconius erato ?
http://www.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fcommons%2Fa%2Fa5%2FHeliconius_erato_petiveranus_MHNT_dos.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcommons.wikimedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFile%3AHeliconius_erato_petiveranus_MHNT.jpg&h=2977&w=4325&tbnid=SNuohsRHWHB9aM%3A&zoom=1&docid=qlj-FNOCDE6KgM&ei=KIiFVbCBCOGqygOM-aIw&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=3424&page=1&start=0&ndsp=34&ved=0CCcQrQMwAg

20.06.2015 18:30, Leon Ortlieb:

pteronymia primula ?

20.06.2015 18:20, Leon Ortlieb:

Terias brenda?

http://www.google.de/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Flithops.com.ua%2Fimage%2Fcache%2Fdata%2Finsecta%2Fbabochki%2Fpieridae%2FTerias%252520%252520brenda-500x500.JPG&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Flithops.com.ua%2Findex.php%3Froute%3Dproduct%2Fproduct%26path%3D59_64_74%26product_id%3D1517&h=500&w=500&tbnid=MkqRrR40mbMlYM%3A&zoom=1&docid=5JI82_Jn0ZT6uM&itg=1&ei=M4SFVaraFubZywOJnqqIAQ&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=1424&page=1&start=0&ndsp=49&ved=0CCEQrQMwAA

20.06.2015 18:08, Leon Ortlieb:

Thank you Alex!
No, I don't collect them. Quite ph. And even then, I not fotoohochus them specifically, but along the way. More birds. But in the case and behind them.
http://club.foto.ru/user/87270

20.06.2015 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, at least with the family, I guess)))
Close to zero in these Mithymna (

20.06.2015 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Inaccurate, because an instance of too much flying. Rescued two views. :) Compounding that female. :)

20.06.2015 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Mythimna congrua / Tentatively identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.06.2015 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Mythimna congrua / Tentatively identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.06.2015 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strongly lёtanaya Mythimna sp. IMHO
Mythimna straminea???
Next, I will not undertake (only suggested).

20.06.2015 6:55, Alex Dumchus:

Come on, Peter, passed. This is interesting, and may wonder? :) I can send you these foty rasteniy- :))).
But seriously:
Leon. I watched almost the same picture, only Swallowtail and Podalirius at the "Utopia" Turkey, Alanya.This hotel is located on the mountain, and in the same place, at the top, near a flower bed, they are going up to a dozen, and below them is almost not there. Butterflies are also chasing each other, with different types of happened and I even took it on video, but turned out badly.And generally, in my experience, there are sailing boats, hardly leaving one place, for example, one pachliopta aristolochiae Tae sitting in the same tree, not flying away from him for more than three meters within a week, while I did not catch it.
Leon, you have no chance feisthamelii in the collection or you just take a picture?

20.06.2015 6:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, it is possible to try, nymph parasite is stored. There is another nymph butterfly, also taken from kirkazona and, in general, 100% sure that if it comes out of someone, it is not exactly a butterfly .....

20.06.2015 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, in your case, the parasite belongs to the order Diptera and the only thing I can advise: try to withdraw it imago svotografirovat and ask to molbiol in this topic: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=138133
Subject to determine the Hymenoptera (if ever will the rider): http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php? showtopic = 133599
The forum is a special on all orders of insects: including by Diptera with Hymenoptera.
True to the Far East where it can be difficult (and indeed elsewhere).
Too early to say that all is lost. Perhaps you are lucky and :)

20.06.2015 1:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Even if you pass the parasite to the Institute, its definition under the big question. For several years, no one to deal with flies, the more such a large family. At best, maybe someone will say race.

19.06.2015 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Alex, send me your comment (18:41) by email at, I'll put it back. It was deleted by an error.

19.06.2015 23:19, Leon Ortlieb:

Alexander Dumchus. There, in Portugal, I saw on top of the mountain is not high, (Tien Shantsev rather than the mountain, and the navel is), dance and dozens of Swallowtail Podalirius. I've never seen. I stood and looked stunned. Butterflies rarely sat, so for the next such a passing off and chase.What have grouse current, which brings together dozens of birds known. And butterflies ??
Then I thought maybe downhill grass is dry from the heat and have less nectar ??
After all, up to the point at the navel, I walked quite a few. I saw one of those sailboats and every day, and rarely flying.
Why are they gathering there? Is it their courtship place ?

19.06.2015 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And she-bear beautiful: very contrasting and bright. From under the feet of flies, just like the fire :)
The variable is true, and there are almost completely yellow.

19.06.2015 20:33, Nikolay Grebennikov:

beautiful photo.

19.06.2015 20:07, Alla Umnova:

Thank you all! All realized uchtu :) Country cleaned and corrected himself - probably just a mistake was found a record of a female of the same species, there is Indonesia.

19.06.2015 19:52, Alla Umnova:

Thank you all! Uchtu for the future - to completely removed :)

19.06.2015 19:21, Alex Dumchus:

Alla. In Peru, there are not a conclusion, there is enough of their, beautiful. Especially morph. In general, this butterfly is not a commercial, of amatusid far as I know, just throw a couple of kinds of stikofalm all. While virtually all, in my opinion, amatusidy great.

19.06.2015 18:56, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Re: Vladimir, and you are underdetermined be shipped in one package and individually.
So I pack has never and is not loaded, load all the images one by one.

19.06.2015 18:41, Alex Dumchus:

...

19.06.2015 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

Koneechno Vasily

19.06.2015 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is appropriate in that case if the form of the parasite known on the photo. Some parasite is "no roll". In your case, some fly-tahina, judging by Poupard. And in flies and other parasites are not strong I think no one should be somewhere in pre-determine the parasite before shipping these photos.
As an example, my photos: http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 25021 where obviously know the form of the parasite and the fact that in my lands, he has his master (specifically: swallowtail). These pictures in my mind it makes sense to put the mind. This is certainly just my opinion)

19.06.2015 17:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Here's a series. And now my question to the administrator and modders. Whether such a load, when the output instead of a butterfly parasite?
This already was loaded to the site and somehow did not approve of was little discussion and the case ended remains unclear.
Someone might say again that all this is superfluous, unnecessary, only it takes place.Excuse me, but a few days ago, I threw one Moder request, what to do, not gruzit- shipping. But the letter did not come see or write once YES - NO.
And along the way more question. If you delete the pictures that comes with their numbers. Peter, can these numbers can be displayed on the site for re-use?

19.06.2015 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Geography probably do better to clean?

19.06.2015 15:55, Alex Dumchus:

I confirm that the form is defined correctly. Location: Malaysia, Indonesia, MB South Taya

19.06.2015 15:50, Leon Ortlieb:

Yeah, well, none of my photos, and I knew it .. How Neoris (huttoni) schencki.
Only the very rare .. I saw her only once in nature, in the evening, when he lived near Alma-Ata.
It seems easier to buy a doll and bring yourself a butterfly ..

19.06.2015 15:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I do not be angry, Leon))) There you pavlinoglazki some: and they often fly at night the males and females during the day. Male easier to bring to light or catch the female and draw on it. In females pavlinogazok very strong pheromones and males often flock to the smell of "packs".By the way, you have determined it is not true: you most likely maleNeoris schencki, and not the Small pavlinoglazkiSaturnia pavoniaat which male and female are as follows: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/38912
P.S. Sorry I did not read it until the end of the commentary: You know her :)

19.06.2015 14:38, Leon Ortlieb:

06/19/2015 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov Well do not be angry ... I told you in this gift Tien Shan show the beauty of the night !!
And if you say, how can I teach her to draw, so sfotat, then I'll tell you, and it NAME !!

http://club.foto.ru/gallery/photos/506042/?collection=3082

19.06.2015 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There's a problem with the geography baalshie likely. View Asia: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/ama/50320001.html and South America can not fly very sight :) I think correctly defined, but it is necessary that someone else looked.

19.06.2015 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Iphiclides feisthamelii.

19.06.2015 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, thank you!
Yes indeed:
http://en.butterflycorner.net/Iphiclides-feisthamelii.1650.0.html
http://eol.org/pages/2870229/overview
http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/IphicFeist.htm
I'll add the species and link the photo to it.

19.06.2015 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

19.06.2015 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hoplodrina octogenaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov Caradrina morpheus / Basil Sergienko.

19.06.2015 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hoplodrina octogenaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov Caradrina morpheus / Basil Sergienko.

19.06.2015 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Basil!

19.06.2015 14:00, Basil Sergienko:

It Caradrina morpheus

19.06.2015 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.06.2015 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, I want to say that the binding in the group immediately after the publication of the author is not part of my duty (and sometimes still do it on an exceptional basis). I only correct the mistakes come to light in this respect. So, what you really get your hands on it yourself :)

19.06.2015 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia basistrigalis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.06.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alla posted photos http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40752. She did the right thing, and the guys look in the gallery can not :)))

19.06.2015 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, and you are underdetermined be shipped in one package and individually :) Due to the fact that they are in the general archive - they are crooked and bed. A similar problem is likely and Zoran Bozovic there it really does not go with moderation: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/38516

19.06.2015 13:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Maniola jurtina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.06.2015 13:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leon, that's for sure Maniola, species in Portugal only jurtina. Very bright female network is given as ssp hispulla. http://www.first-nature.com/insects/lb-maniola-jurtina.php

19.06.2015 13:00, Leon Ortlieb:

06.18.2015 17:06 Alexander Zhakov. I can not judge ..
There is a site http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Maniola_Jurtina,
But to me it is not like Jurtina ..

19.06.2015 12:51, Vladimir Bryukhov:

OK, I realized his mistake, but the name of the file to edit can not. And to kind of determined to molbiole Olearius, aka Evgeny Tsvetkov. I myself, too, at first thought to Scoparia ...

19.06.2015 12:47, Leon Ortlieb:

06/18/2015 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov. Thank you! I tried, but could not load. Probably not figured out how to, and does not bother ..

19.06.2015 12:20, Leon Ortlieb:

06/18/2015 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov, I do not know. A lot of time has passed. In the bush daisies and close, twist a few butterflies ..

19.06.2015 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

I neponyal where it was written: where specific name or where clarification. But this information to determine why it removed?

19.06.2015 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It olearius like :) In the admin was Eudonia sp. the top line resets and I wrote that we should not specify anything there

19.06.2015 12:06, Shamil Murtazin:

You see, Peter, and would give Alla link to FAQs Wrapper Joomla photo and all. And it is not present :) Come on, I'll write a separate post, and then I will have unlimited time for the right to edit, to append missing.
Alla! Photography course should be cut "on the butterfly", but, importantly, do not overdo it.If the alignment of tones and levels you did not work - the place as it is.
Important! It should be possible to compress photos in size to less than 1024x768, then they will not be pinched on the website and will be in the same form in which you have downloaded them.

19.06.2015 12:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, wrong to think this is not Eudonia lacustrata, rather Scoparia basistrigalis, too, but I could be wrong, I have this group ognevok not like :(.
Pointing to the kind of definition is necessary in the comments of the author, that would be a start of something. Determination to sort, it is also a definition.
It is necessary to erase mobiole, if you specify the author definition, then it is simply not recorded correctly.Tsvetkov determined Eudonia sp.

19.06.2015 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, if a butterfly is only defined to genus do not need to write anything on the top line when booting. If was identified as Eudonia sp. actually means is undefined at the moment. I think forEudonia lacustrata? ))

19.06.2015 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Vladimir Bryukhov Not identified.

19.06.2015 11:06, Peter Khramov:

Alla, photos put online once the gallery. If in doubt in the definition, check the box "imprecise definition of" boot. If you need to crop the photo or still somehow edit to boot - certainly do it. As an example of the quality of the photo I do not see (if there should be).

19.06.2015 9:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

If you are unsure of the country put a question mark? Peru or Peru ?. will know that there are doubts about the author's photo or specifically: Peru? (country listed by the seller). The more concrete, the more confidence and that does not need to domyslivat. :))

19.06.2015 9:45, Alla Umnova:

About Peru agree, why I wrote in the comments and not in place. Perhaps in my case did not indicate the country? It is possible that the seller had in mind the farm, although excretory kind usually better quality.
Photos without flash, filmed soap box with lights and a tripod that be try to come up with, thanks for the advice :)

19.06.2015 9:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Date of capture important capture butterflies in nature. When shooting the dried specimens, the date of recording is really about nothing to say.

19.06.2015 8:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Confused Peru, I understand Asian appearance. Quality tolerance. Wishing not use the flash and ambient light to do and take pictures with a tripod, at the maximum aperture is closed.

19.06.2015 8:11, Alla Umnova:

I really philatelist :) In '89 saw souvenir framed butterflies and propane)), then moved on though not badly glued to the frame, but still with the labels on the exact place and date - units ((trying to read something,But the book was not then really get it - Encyclopedia Smart was for happiness - for my level :) And after school time hobby has become smaller.
But the butterfly still collected and photographed them, I still will. Technical issue - because a decent number of butterflies was purchased with a proud inscription sp.and I have determined their own how best to proceed?
Spread here to confirm / refute or immediately upload to the site? I go try the way to master the process of pouring ph.And spread the originals, or even be better to crop the photo? Does the date of shooting - because in my case, it is with the butterfly is not related?
And with the quality, look - is acceptable or should be better?

19.06.2015 3:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I always have this attitude in season)))
On loin Now sit - many teoyat (
There will be more butterflies and beetles: the nature there is notable))
A little hello from the Vladimir region (sfotat June 12):

But rain is not necessary.In addition to rain midges there was no one flies: Only mosquitoes Yes Mote rain uneasy and "work donor" rather than to deal with insects (((

19.06.2015 0:27, Peter Khramov:

Yes, and the reference in the title block is not right on the page forumnye Community, and on the tape without the overhead of comments about the transfer, etc.

19.06.2015 0:26, Peter Khramov:

News now shows only two, and they are pushed down. Blog is not shown (for better times). Above displays the last 3 ne_sluzhebnyh hocks in the Community.
Conveniently?

18.06.2015 23:55, Peter Khramov:

Aha, only the required data must be on the page.
Maria, a general search, esnno, for cases where the species is known.

18.06.2015 23:52, Peter Khramov:

No, well, rain-what kanesh again will be, but in general, the right attitude, fighting!

18.06.2015 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mary, "general search" box on the right is at the top of each page. There you can enter the name and pops up a link to a page type. Maybe pop a few names at the coincidence of names. Then we have to choose the desired one.A formalization of adult flight time, the lifetime of the tracks, zoogeographic zone, the length of the front wing and the wingspan on the site I do. But for one reason or another can not be done all at once. Therefore, if you need to be somewhere formalivat these symptoms you write directly on the form page.I am sure I will pay attention, and I will do if I can find the data required for this :)

18.06.2015 22:40, Maria Pozdnova:

Thank you, kind of appeared, probably from the time of flight of formalization .. Let me explain my question: initially did not know the name of the species and determined not through the catalog, and a shame that such a convenient system has not worked. Butterflies do not collect, but take pictures and enjoy trying to identify them.Wingspan, for fans like me, has no practical application. What is the "general search" is not understood.

18.06.2015 21:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena proboscidalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.06.2015 21:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zerynthia polyxena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.06.2015 21:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zerynthia polyxena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.06.2015 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.06.2015 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Siona only 1 views:Siona lineata, but in my opinion on something and not unlike. Most likely another kind and of a different kind?

18.06.2015 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spontaneously I went yesterday at 18:30 pm. Arrived at the point at 22:00 (it is more than 100 km. From the house by train + more walking through the woods with the heaviest backpack kilometer 4). And approx. 23:00 rain-shower "buckets" and the outlook as always lied (((
These 5 species is now exposed - almost everything that had to collect (there is a little small things for tomorrow) ...Yes, and he drenched and it looks like a cold sleeping in the woods (reverse train at 4:30 am) (((
Dissatisfied trip (((
Do not worry: Saturday is likely to get out of the three of us with a generator and XRD, and then come off)))

18.06.2015 19:31, Sergey Appolonov: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2015 19:31, Sergey Appolonov: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zerynthia polyxena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.06.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zerynthia polyxena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.06.2015 19:11, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it could be nice. But almost unreal. Half do not know that there are any comments. Is that an email spam on the subject. Then, probably, yes. But again, wait for the reaction faster than a day or two, it is not necessary.

18.06.2015 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Shtoyt you somewhere to the side left, citizens ...

18.06.2015 18:39, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander. I'm not as delicate as your friends and collectors happy to buy butterflies, grown on the farm, the more that they are always excellent quality. Especially if you can not catch this instance in nature.Figuratively speaking: you can walk into the woods to kill a wild boar meat and eat it, this will be someone better - wood, wild boar hunters, or - I do not know, but you can buy a pork tenderloin, well, or grow it.
Moreover, not all corners of the forest (ie the world) can be reached.And how do you propose to catch ornithopter? Try to catch the nature or aleksandrae viktoriae- ... and you will be up to life. Previously, for Ulysses caught almost executed. That's why the need and the farm. Thank aziatam- they started breeding ptitsekrylok, butanitisov, and of other CITES.Until this has gradually reach Latinos, and there, staring, and Africa is ripe. Remember the fate of our (or Belarus), bison, and other Far Eastern tigers. And why do not we raise lyudorfy and other sericin? Or Swallowtail, Polixenes, Podalirius - they are found in your region. An overabundance of butterflies in nature will not be, especially with some of our ecology.In addition, the farm also perform additional educational function, as well as many butterflies just get away from there, or they are released (as on Phukete- h. Bolina) and they multiply there, in nature. Farms are doing a good job.
Also, I want to insert a word about the geography: the local population, especially in Africa, yu.Ameriki, and in the southeast.Asia this sin, do not bother with the definition of coordinates. In fact - and the time too (well, if you specify a month). It then collectors and dealers come up with what they want, and sometimes they do not bother yourself with this.Therefore, in a variety of collections set of accurate data, at least in Africa, and in general in the tropics, invented!
So what, then, and not kollektsionirovat- types of butterflies, no, I will not take it - it is not an exact date! Or geography! In general, the purity of the race it does not, from the slaves received and slave grown, it is not kosher.And as for me, and dvornyazhka- dog, as long as the soul was!

18.06.2015 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leon, in this photo in the photo numbered 40708 and 40709, the same individual?
If so, then the combine, please shots in the group.

18.06.2015 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40714 group.

18.06.2015 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40712 group.

18.06.2015 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I had to add one more colloquial name :)
Lord (clutching his head), how many of them ......

18.06.2015 17:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb.

18.06.2015 17:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Based on the author's comments isLycaena phlaeas:)

18.06.2015 17:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

18.06.2015 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

2013-05-21 15:59:12 2013-05-21 16:01:09.

18.06.2015 17:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It would be good if the authors have read the comments addressed to them ....
Whine, but I do not like to knit group shall immediately after publication (((

18.06.2015 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40722 group.

18.06.2015 17:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is likelyManiola jurtina, or the kind that it replaces in Portugal.

18.06.2015 17:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lasiommata megera / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb Not identified.

18.06.2015 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

2013-05-21 15:59:12 2013-05-21 16:01:09.

18.06.2015 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The reason for the binding of the group was the Ponoy match the date and time on all four pictures.The reason transport in females that in the photo # 40718 by the structure of the antennae well noticeable :)
Leon, I have to ask you: in order to avoid unnecessary confusion on the website, Please provide combine photos depicting the same individual in a group on their own and in a timely manner despite the fact that this function is always available in your LK

18.06.2015 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.06.2015 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.06.2015 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.06.2015 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.06.2015 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40719 group.

18.06.2015 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40718 group.

18.06.2015 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40717 group.

18.06.2015 16:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb.

18.06.2015 16:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Phalera bucephala / Leon Ortlieb.

18.06.2015 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Leon Ortlieb Pararge aegeria / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.06.2015 15:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.06.2015 15:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.06.2015 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.06.2015 12:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander Zhakov BRAVO !!!

18.06.2015 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, and you did not try to do sprinkled? Cut the butterflies from the entire frame to the increase was more?

18.06.2015 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.06.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Abrostola triplasia / Vitaly Gumenuk Abrostola tripartita / Basil Sergienko.

18.06.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To me too :)

18.06.2015 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Vitaly Gumenuk Xanthorhoe ferrugata / Basil Sergienko.

18.06.2015 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Gentlemen, you have not understood correctly. :) I explain your position (not to be confused with the position of the site).
The site is designed all who is interested in butterflies. Nature lovers, curious children and adults, wildlife photographers, collectors, amateurs and scientists. All place here.:)
It needs pictures, especially qualitative, that there was an opportunity to identify. It is sad to see the poor quality photos, broken into the trash or negligent butterflies pictures butterflies casually straightened. Disappointing lack of geography and the date of recording or photographing.It's one thing when they do not exist, there is no label under the butterfly, lost data is negative (in this case, select it, that would not think badly of laziness or a special acumen to expose the photo). Another thing is when the author just too lazy to fill in two lines, or so he thinks, and come down, everyone should be grateful to me that I leave a photo.Now the answer to Alexander. Alexander, I know people who collect butterflies seriously, much more than "philatelists" I'm not talking about scientists who are engaged in this for the money, they usually are not collectors (with rare exceptions).If you mean the ratio of 1:10 000, engaged in professional (for money, but not all of them even cook drugs, not to mention the analysis of the gene), and those with five butterflies in a box from under sweets, then probably yes. I mean serious collectors, the collection of which is occupied by tens and hundreds of boxes and butterflies go by the thousands.None of them does the gene. analysis, research drugs unit, but to put in their collections of butterflies without labels they will not. Some people collect butterflies live where others make long expeditions (of course at their own expense), their collections have a certain scientific and material value.Collecting butterflies without labels, and often without defining or srednepotolochnogo definition, is the initial stage of many collectors, some very quickly grow out of short pants, others remain at this level forever (and it is quite satisfied,and it is their full right) and such people targeted industry for the removal of butterflies on farms, production of various monsters, the description of forms and subspecies empty. This is the "Philatelists." For you. Alexander, it passed stage, by the fact that you can see for your collection, just stay :) nostalgia for this period, but it will pass.:)) Among collectors of butterflies, "philatelists" minority.
:))

Professionals to the site almost do not go, they are not interested.

18.06.2015 10:56, Peter Khramov:

If there is geography - it is always advisable to specify.
If not - still loaded better without geography than nothing. And you can always remove Fautua.
Essno, we need not only dnevnits foty Russia, just under them now scheduled spetsprozhekt pilot.
The scientific value of an object / action can assess sane researcher.To save or not to save a wild couple of butterflies - a purely moral issue. On the preservation of the species is not affected.
What you need to "protect nature" and "save the species" (and whether) - the answer is not so obvious.Value for collectors of pictures and entomologists matters to the business plan of the enterprise entomological focus on something, whose opinion has the right to life, and whose does not have, it does not affect.
Public funding of this science is now much better than 10-15 years ago. And in general, how much was there at Tanasiichuk ..."Your life is not rich, but interesting." However, this is with the artists / writers: you can not write - do not write. Accordingly, it can not be engaged in entomology - not engaged.
A site with us all. Who photographs who catches who takes and who is an entomologist. So we continue to live together, and certainly no one is persecuted, yeah.

18.06.2015 9:52, Basil Sergienko:

In fact, in my opinion it tripartita

18.06.2015 8:56, Basil Sergienko:

It X.ferrugata

18.06.2015 8:30, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Sorry, inserting their 5 cents.
Once upon a time in my youth, too, was "turned" on butterflies, but the biological faculty of Moscow State University .... I do not shine, so I went to tehvuz what is now absolutely no regrets. Butterflies and other insects like until now, but do not collect in the first place by conviction, and secondly because it is far from entomology.Touching love insects, love does not kill the youth, having fun taking pictures. From time to time I'm in the tropics who are bad copies of the photos from the wild? This is also a kind of gathering of pictures ... and is convinced that such material from the site certainly would not be worse.Do not chase us when we went here, it is certainly not because they "ran past" ....

18.06.2015 7:55, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander. Do you know the percentage of people engaged in professional (genetics, cooking genitals, etc. ....), ie, these entomologists, and, as you call them - "collectors picture" of the world, or at least the country? 1: 10000 .......... 0.Given this factor, then WHOSE opinion has the right to life?
I myself as a child dreamed of becoming an entomologist, but in Rostov University at the Faculty of Biology has been a great competition and had to enter the Polytechnic ... what now, after many years, do not regret.Public funding of this science and then it was poor, but now something that even though there ???
Or rests on the shoulders of the poor intuziasty-entomologists and all research at their own expense? Exactly...
And I thank God that the money is not paid, and have the opportunity to travel around the world for fun, catch butterflies, to acquire them, taking pictures, that is.e. indirectly, in any way contribute to "amateur pictures" in lipedopterologiyu. And we, of millions of ...

17.06.2015 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander is the view "philatelist", but he also has a right to life. :)) But it is not entomology and clean gathering "pictures". If deliver satisfaction mean for you is good. Another is not suitable.

17.06.2015 21:34, Alex Dumchus:

Me, as a man once close to science, though in a completely different field, always touches the phrase - "scientific value", especially as applied to private collections.
Answer the question-who cares? It is necessary first of all to -sebe! Well, there is a desire - to collect butterflies.Question to all- how many people from your inner circle is still interested in this? I - as a childhood friend and Boris Stradomsky, but he lives in another city and "imprisoned" by blues.
Another question-how many people recently showed you their collection, so to speak, for scientific purposes?
Exactly...Do you know how many butterflies are now bred in kennels? I have been in three different countries, so there is still present species is not typical for the area. Of course this applies to commercial butterfly (unfortunately!), Ie rare and beautiful.
Why then say that the butterfly without labels - as it were, and not a butterfly, as well as an element of decor ...like saying that the egg is obtained at the poultry farm no longer an egg at all ... Another example, for example, about the non-indigenous inhabitants of America ... etc.
By the way, I got grown and Maak bianorov from China and they are visually indistinguishable from our own.And, sorry, according to the same Stradomsky, whose opinion I trust, from dried, then soaked again and dried butterflies -genetiki almost vytyanesh.In addition, many butterflies escape from the nursery, forming natural areas already - I caught dryas julia in Tae and caligo memnon in northern Mexico, simply because they are bred on farms there.For me, bred at home graellsia isabellae much steeper than caught in the Apennines, where they are almost gone - so I saved a couple of wild !!!
In addition, bringing butterflies in captivity watching much more, so to speak from a scientific point of view.
Is it not so that Vasili - you're deduced Pavon.And worse than your Pavonia wild?
By the way, is now trying to bring up piri to breed in sufficient quantity, we naturally left them very little.
So, Alla, expose, and we'll determine which country or nursery look.

17.06.2015 21:09, Alla Umnova:

Thank you for your gracious welcome :))
Shamil, unfortunately, almost all of Russia is not even something that I caught it myself from trips - there are Jamaica, Costa Rica and some of Cuba. In Russia very little - just polkorobochki geometrid the bear and some blues.I'm already on the 890th instance) that is approximately half have already mastered, finished catalog - all the old records in the notebooks will also take pictures. But again - Rosii very little :(

17.06.2015 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the catalog vestimo. There's only "" The length of the front wing "" is, and the wingspan is formalized because I also say that I do not see that on it were selected. I can not catch up since then rarely use the catalog: lack of general search, in most cases :)

17.06.2015 17:37, Peter Khramov:

Where is there. And that means sorting by color. Sorted by color no no. Let's not confuse the concept of sorting and selection / filter.

17.06.2015 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way: there is no set "Wingspan" In my opinion it should be added.

17.06.2015 16:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Parameter set 2: "Region (Russia)" (put your-8) and "Custom taxon" (hammered kind Mesoleuca)
All displayed.
And all this sort of color and so on. I have to be honest and do not understand))
P.S. There really was not formalized. Formalized only just time volley and wingspan (it is all). Try.

17.06.2015 15:56, Peter Khramov:

Et itself. But if he does not appear in the catalog, one must understand why. Maybe some kind of glitch. Although the probability of that is simply not formalized some of the symptoms.

17.06.2015 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my case, if it is known in the Latin name of the species is better to use the main site search)))
Here dostatotno dial just albicillata , and it immediately pops up as Other albicillata but her site is simply no)

17.06.2015 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Certainly such important points as the host plants and others. Especially regarding the specific specimen. the best place in the author's comments.
But we are talking about non-compliance of the claimed real-time editing.When you write a comment you take into account it is stated the time during which you can edit your post, not approximate.
20-30 minutes should not be here, but must be exactly 30 as stated here: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/29633
In a post on the 17.10.2014 23:47
Inconsistency in 10 minutes (i.e.one-third) when editing the given time, and so to a minimum - just not serious ((

17.06.2015 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Grammodes stolida / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.06.2015 12:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa atalanta / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

17.06.2015 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa atalanta / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

17.06.2015 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No itGrammodes stolida:) If I'm not mistaken. I will not tolerate is: wait for more opinions.

17.06.2015 11:58, Vladimir Deryabin:

It Vanessa atalanta?

17.06.2015 11:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Dear Alla!
On this website, welcome everyone: scientists, amateurs and enthusiasts =)
Photos of species not presented on the site is very welcome. As well as missing angles, stage of development and some characteristics of the species.
By the way, we are currently trying to collect all the photos of butterflies of Russia. Do you have such items? =)

17.06.2015 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alla, the site is always welcome new authors, and there is always a need to expand the site.
If you want to do: connect. Especially here it does not matter what kind of material: a snapshot in nature or collector)))
Welcome to the site )))

17.06.2015 11:39, Vladimir Deryabin:

Grammodes bifasciata ?

17.06.2015 10:20, Alla Umnova:

Basil, hello! Many thanks and acknowledgment and for the advice :) Unfortunately, in my case, only their own fees (which, even though it is necessary to spread) have all the necessary information. And I have such a little bit. Woe is me, but about a half thousand copies of my collection, at best, marked the country.I understand that my collection does not have any scientific value, but is still trying to determine the species. Thanks by the way, great, all enthusiasts of your wonderful site - in many ways it helped me a lot, a little book.And, if you still question whether the site photos from amateur like me? I have some views that the photos on the site have little or no, let's say, with underside. Tropical copper-butterfly, which has views of the photos on the website do not. Do I need it? I'm going to take pictures of the meeting, but was not sure whether the material is useful site.

17.06.2015 10:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, the author comments on the photos, you can change whenever you want. What is the problem? A 20-30 min. to correct typos and errors in the text of comments pictures for all participants. It's all right. :)

17.06.2015 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

17.06.2015 9:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hello, Ala. I think that in my assumption aboutPapilio maackiiyou're absolutely right.
A little advice: if you want to BM accurately determine the type of never mess with butterflies without geographic data and it is desirable so as to catch and date was (but that in such cases, all you have from the realm of fantasy) :)

17.06.2015 8:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, I read about it. And your opinion and Peter. But I would like to fix such a possibility has been constant, rather than 20 minutes. I've found your lyapus 2 weeks later, and the UK-to stay here still, he only knows Peter

17.06.2015 7:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You can correct its own comments theoretically within half an hour after publication. In fact, it turns out that less than 20 minutes on this matter stands. How many have already written about this non-compliance in this topic: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/29633 ... All "like peas against the wall" (((

17.06.2015 6:58, Alla Umnova:

Welcome! I would be very grateful for the help with the definition!
Unfortunately, I can not point to any place any time - a copy of the purchase, and the data is lost. Own investigations have led to the assumption that it is the female Papilio maackii spring generation?
< / a>
< / a>
7-7.5 cm wingspan.Thank you very much in advance.

17.06.2015 2:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Typo. It should be read. Caterpillar on food plants Celastrus flagellaris (celastrus pleteobrazny).
All the same bad that in the event of errors, specification, etc. can not fix their own comments.

17.06.2015 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Tell me, what kind of value to put the signs?

16.06.2015 22:55, Maria Pozdnova:

Question on the search in the directory. Search convenient, but can not find a particular type of search Mesoleuca albicillata on 4 criteria: color, time of flight of the family, region. The size of the fine. I get 45 species on one page, but is not required. I do not know what I'm doing wrong.

16.06.2015 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How long something is eating (you past the age). Mine was taken on the day before (May 26), fed also birch and wove a cocoon had June 6: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40331
His wager fastselinu because Ponomarev took last year from my point (went together), and it brought her: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/36413 A thought on selenitiku .....We hope that you, too, it is: fastselina good too :)
Certainly better-selenitiku to find, but it seems to me that it is almost impossible (((

16.06.2015 20:51, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Caterpillar taken, eats birch. If we can bring - we will know the truth.

16.06.2015 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Schiffermuelleria schaefferella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.06.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2015 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The boy))) Yes, let it be for a point. Insects do not happen much. I would imagine even in a collection put gonepteryx from Bulgaria)))

16.06.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think it is. The question is not exactly up there, alas ((
Imagine there is a trench dug in a piece of wood and set fire to it in the litter. And next to trees on fire did not spread. I think that makes the people who are responsible for the forest (forest rangers, etc..) To then cut down and sell the wood (pine timber there) referring to the fallen.And nobody thinks and never really thought much of insects in all stages (and not only them) will burn in that same litter ...... Anyway will destroy an entire biocenosis (((
And Mnemosyne flies approx. a kilometer away from this conflagration .......
And how biotsenozov destroyed in Moscow and the surrounding areas due to the so-called"anti-bark beetle?" The horror ....
In the wild can not intervene and we must protect it primarily from person .....

16.06.2015 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Darling photos, why delete? A smaller one more. :)

16.06.2015 19:23, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!
This image can be deleted, since photo of a butterfly on a site in excess, but the poor quality of the picture - the distance to 10-12 meters butterfly.

16.06.2015 19:08, Alexander Belousov:

On account obzhorika - to the point! As living grinder. In the evening a full paddock leaves, and in the morning - poop and dry twigs.

16.06.2015 18:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gonepteryx rhamni / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.06.2015 18:33, Peter Khramov:

There are no edges in Russia, that issue was not raised.

16.06.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Poshuchu" even)))
I put yourself in the following year a clear goal. Find it in those places where the question of the protection of insects never climbed never had never been any protected areas, and just a good clean, beautiful and untouched nature)))
Mnemosyne is already there. I will Apollo)))

16.06.2015 17:26, Peter Khramov:

Basil, a practical joker, because "in 1938, the issue of protection of insects did not exist."

16.06.2015 17:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

To this we must aspire. :) I took the same view. but just omitted the right wing. but the quality of copies. and the quality of the photo. Do not compare higher ... :)))

16.06.2015 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I had in mind some strictly defined as a measure of the angle (for example, the upper wing)
So what you're written a certain framework is not justified and only aesthetics :)
By the way: tortricidae that you bring as an example of the same is expanded somewhat asymmetrically :) Once again proves that it is very difficult to guess ....

16.06.2015 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

I mean that valuable collection of its instances, regardless of the quality of the material. everything depends on the aesthetic taste of the owner. On the site if the expanded specimens, the only suite exceptions below. Basil, the lower wing should link up with the top with a very small gap, ie,Immersed certain position does not depend on the taste of distending, look at your favorite book of Fig. 50.

16.06.2015 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree but usually just hard to guess the angle. And then, after removal from raspravilki can easily lead (affected by temperature, humidity: in short everything). Sometimes I have to lift up the wings in the hope that they will fall over time, but do not fall .....And then once again soaked material with a high probability to lose as (((
Thank God that this angle applies only to the lower edge of the front wing with respect to the axis of the body. On the corner of the hind wings there is no criterion: it is a matter of taste))

16.06.2015 16:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

If the photo is displayed on the site, which is meant to be watching hundreds of thousands of people, it is important to have everything straightened butterflies must have angles of 90 deg., And not how it happened. Exception. for unique species and a stretch for the first picture for the species.
http://www.lepiforum.de/bh/finnische_falter/Choristoneura_hebenstreitella_1.jpg

16.06.2015 16:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Collect the series and work out. The truth on the micro itself is not enough: to be honest (dead matter "with protractor" angle display). Most importantly, it does not quality raspravki (in many large collections of material and does not straighten to save space), and the view of the butterfly itself.

16.06.2015 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Good micro straighten that flea shoe :). Although it is gigantic Micra, it is still difficult. I saw how the pros work on micro and Sinev Bidzilya. I have so much patience when there was none. I straighten the same: how to succeed. It turns out sometimes good, but more so here.And if the night before a hundred prick and spread, then the quality of the technology and not chasing the number of sharpened. :(

16.06.2015 15:56, Peter Khramov:

And we can get! Experience - son of the first practice makes perfect!

16.06.2015 15:48, Igor Sakhno:

Of all similar approaches more this species, although it is not sure of its range.

16.06.2015 15:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is in 45 reserve was only organized, but the place was a cult long before :)
Although he did not go there: I prefer to look on their own terms. I like it more than a buzz
Well, the coordinates of the points, I do believe more than public. On the day before Mnemosyne did not deliberately set, to be honest.In order to then not Rushed all and sundry and knocked her (now the GPS in every second phone). And there as a penny and a half of my apartment: so just do not find ....

16.06.2015 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

For many it is better not turn out, and a little bit is not necessary. one is already there. :)

16.06.2015 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the reserve was established in 1945. In 1938, the issue of protection of insects did not exist. As always puts paragraphs nearest town to the point of capture, sometimes ukzyvalos distance and bearing from this settlement, but it is rare, as well as now coordinates.

16.06.2015 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why joker? Really in PTZ catches polmoskvy and labels are not tied to the reserve and to the settlements, which are either in the reserve or around it. Places where you can say cult))

16.06.2015 12:55, Peter Khramov:

Well, Basil, you're a joker ...

16.06.2015 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It seems people just encrypted and writes the name of the nearest village so as not to shine on the label that the butterfly is withdrawn from the reserve))). And even more so when the butterfly was collected it was certainly very strict with the issue of fishing in the territory of any OOPT (specially protected natural area). Still, in 1938 .....
P.S. Igor correct.The name of the settlement Meadows should be written without quotes :)

16.06.2015 9:43, Igor Ivannikov:

Thank Basil.

16.06.2015 8:46, Yuri Semejkin:

It is! Caterpillar before pupation stops there, and then move. If you have land, some buried in the ground (of course not all). I, too, it happens. You look at a caterpillar-then you died, or not. Just do not throw, hold for a while, looking at times and then pupate and the butterfly came out.
But in my case it did not.

16.06.2015 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not need to study the geography of the internet MO: I have lived here for almost 50 years)))
Meadows is actually PTZ.
That's a very good friend of mine was collecting it there is the same: http://insectamo.ru/larva/34-papilionidae/60-parnassius-apollo
See geografmyu necessary to a collector.
By the way: In the village itself, it could not be and can not, but in seё okrestnostyaz easily.
Yet.if memory serves me right in the PTA, work on acclimatization species in those areas. (the experiment was unsuccessful) ie it has a population of Apollo iskusstvennnoe origins and is now almost extinct (((

16.06.2015 0:28, Igor Ivannikov:

I'm not too lazy to look the information on the Internet. Village "Meadows" is located in the south-west, near the borders of the reserve.

16.06.2015 0:17, Shamil Murtazin:

I'll try to straighten it, it may turn out better than the last time =)

16.06.2015 0:15, Shamil Murtazin:

It's a pity. Write down that offer. Maybe even meet a similar =)
Incidentally, I did not throw one gusyanku the stood - and she pupate. Waiting may be that worthwhile work.

16.06.2015 0:11, Igor Ivannikov:

Basil, perhaps to preserve detail.

16.06.2015 0:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Status "pen" on 06/16/2015:
1. Egg Podalirius (probably)
Podaliriy_gus_2__02
originally it was a bit whiter (before the release of the egg should be mirror-silver)

2. Caterpillar Podalirius
Podaliriy_gus_1__02
I shed in a purely green caterpillar

3.Gypsy moth (try to withdraw)
Neparnyy__1

4. Swallowtail has grown from eggs to use osmetriya
Mahaon__01

5. Hook casually someone likeYponomeuta malinellus
Malinellus__01

6. Eater cruciferous.From a purely yellow gusyanki evolved here in this:
Krestotsvetnoedka__02

7. DollyPhigalia pilosaria. I thought gusyanka froze, and she pupate motionless for several days.
Phigalia pilosaria__01

8. Two cocoon lasiocampidaeMalacosoma neustria
Kokonopryad_01

9.Dolly gusyanki with sea buckthorn (there are suggestions?):
Oblepihovaya__01
Oblepihovaya__02
Oblepihovaya__03

It seems nobody has forgotten ...

15.06.2015 23:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Over "patient", dried up. We should probably delete, will remain visible in the uncertainty.

15.06.2015 22:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Gusyanok stop collecting butterflies and eggs, at the same time head of the diary for self-control to a month and all dovyvodit safely go on vacation and not for someone not to worry.
At the same time, it is a little "magic Pendeli" for Peter in terms of blogging service.
I put the bar at least one otchёtik week. IeLeft = 4 report)
Comments are welcome.

15.06.2015 22:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, the patient ?. =)

15.06.2015 22:22, Shamil Murtazin:

perfectly preserved :)

15.06.2015 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apollo has to be: it is I myself understood at cenosis there the :)
Here Erebus is not seen, but I think everything is still ahead.
Yesterday in this take only L. maera or may L. petropolitana flew not just to them was.

15.06.2015 20:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mnemosyne confused with Aporia Crataegi flight ??? No, I do not believe. If only an amateur, but he straightened and they can be mistaken)))

15.06.2015 20:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I served 5 years in those places. Mnemosyne was full. But the place to look for. It is not rare there. Podalirius also not uncommon. In Mnemosyne one generation from 10 May to 10 June (year-on-year). Seek Erebia. Apollo way there too. I knew 2 points. But I have not found so it Oeneis

15.06.2015 18:36, Nikolay Grebennikov:

yes ... 77 years butterfly is cool))

15.06.2015 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

15.06.2015 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

15.06.2015 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2013-08-17 14:00:00.

15.06.2015 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Meadows, Serpukhov district which means "PTZ" and the abbreviation And this means Oka-terraced reserve ........

15.06.2015 15:35, Igor Ivannikov:

Many years ago, a taxidermist I saw hammer coinage proposed change. He offered me a replacement pair of butterflies. Unfortunately, only one survived.

15.06.2015 15:29, Alex Dumchus:

Well, someone has a bullet in his head caught in the Lubyanka, and someone in the meadow of butterflies.

15.06.2015 15:28, Igor Ivannikov:

Yes I also like.

15.06.2015 15:26, Peter Khramov:

Wonderful copy.

15.06.2015 15:23, Igor Ivannikov:

No, not wrong. Everything is as it is.

15.06.2015 15:18, Alex Dumchus:

C year were not mistaken there?

15.06.2015 13:52, Peter Khramov:

In flight, it happens FIG make out. Although, if the years of training (and it is in the catching and not pictured), the.

15.06.2015 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Knowing not beguiled :))), except that it is very far away.

15.06.2015 12:39, Peter Khramov:

Memo needs in the subject, where the question was asked - in the case when the question is asked not where events take place (which, of course, too much is not gud). Panimash?

15.06.2015 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can and Russia: http://biodat.ru/db/rb/rb.php?src=1&vid=151))) Yes, where it just is not included ....
By the way. Flies she's mixed up with Aporia Crataegi. So that you can easily lured not know))

15.06.2015 11:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

QC Russia abruptly, why waste your time on a regional?

15.06.2015 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Incidentally forest burned yesterday (approx. One kilometer) ..... That is sad (((
I add a link from Vladimir QC (they are one of the patterns are written). Incidentally Petushki district. in the spread is not even specified))
Incidentally kilometers from the border regions 15. On the river Klyazma ("rucheeёk" in fact) it passes and habitats on both sides of the same)))

15.06.2015 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Withdrawal of Russian Red Data Book species of nature are possible only if the relevant permissions, and only academic institutions. regardless PA or not. In protected areas there is even steeper demand.I personally believe that this is not the case, the withdrawal from the nature of the individual specimens of adults, as does not affect the populations of insects, it does play a role other factors. But this is a personal opinion. The law says another. Remember, the annual Moscow bursa.What does QC Moscow region has to Vladimirs area? :)))
I can be confused in today's realities in Russia on the issue of conservation.
Useful information is needed. :)) Any forums and social networks :))
In Mnemosyne no second generation of years stretched its range, in the mountains and in August saw fresh.
Thank you. :))

15.06.2015 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rather than a blade of grass, leaves and stalks of wood :)
Members of the genus do not eat herbaceous plants.

15.06.2015 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleksaendr divided own observations is not bad. I repeat: the information need any.
And the butterfly was, we would have if it were common watched it regularly for almost forty years that ekskursiruyu ... I would argue: the type really is not much in my region and narrow local spread .....
And there, where specimen.There are no protected areas (where 25 meters dachas).
If it were put out of PTZ (to her everything and go), then we could raise questions (Reserve is still).
Fly they are really all broken ((Probably on the decline of a generation. It is interesting: in my latitude it gives 2 generations? It seems to be ...
P.S.Memo reduced if the information contained in it are not satisfied.

15.06.2015 10:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

The view is not rare, occurs locally, but in normal habitats, sometimes massive. Distribution of almost all of Europe and much of Asia :) Despite this, Russia and some other countries, is protected by law.:) Expose the nature of the material seized from a Russian residence permit, and to paint what is rare and where it is listed is not good for the site. Another thing to photograph nature. But as I understand, they are not from this point. The fact that you found a new point of view, it's good, I do not take this into question, but it is primarily interesting to you.Finding a new point in the area where it is known, moreover, in the center of the area, the information is not super valuable. I'm talking about the fact that this type of forum information., Is good at forumkah, but here it looks like something is not clear. I understand copies.exhibited for the point and understood its subsequent transfer to the second gallery, why the back of the photo? If you show the opposite direction, it would be possible to find an instance of a known point. )

15.06.2015 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander) So Phoebus) is also nice.
During one trip 3 Red Book once. Well yesterday, "kneaded")))

15.06.2015 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And most of us have no one. Oh, it's the no doubt. Just unusual specimens. )
By the way: it is closer to home, too, there is no catch kilometers from the house 100-plus ....

15.06.2015 9:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The integrity of the specimen. it does not matter if it is a rare species, and everything else the first copies. with a new, self openly and anyone not previously known point. TE ind., as it has historical value, not just a "funny pictures")
More Mnemosyne from this location you anywhere on the time you will not see no great shakes.I can assure)) There nobody else goes, and your humble servant monitors these places purposefully for the third season in a row)))
Sorbral last series - lёtanye all (((It seems a bit late already ....

15.06.2015 9:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Such comments copyrights is better to give a photo in nature :) Then the integrity of copies. irrelevant.

15.06.2015 8:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

It really Rhodostrophia vibicaria.

15.06.2015 8:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea diamina / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.06.2015 8:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea diamina / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.06.2015 8:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

15.06.2015 8:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

15.06.2015 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here I want to ask to check the definition. Frankly, too, the first time such a checkered met.

15.06.2015 8:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A very original caught yesterday. For the first time in my life so that dyed meet.
Error eliminated: 8 is the only species of the genus Rhodostrophia :)
Generally well yesterday to catch ...

15.06.2015 0:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I joined. A comment he remains the same machine. Why writings deal with excess ....

15.06.2015 0:12, Maxim Schwarz:

Caterpillar-obzhorik eats tasty blade of grass :-)

14.06.2015 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just like the feeling that there is this kind.And my misgivings were justified in full)))
I want to submit a copy of the first meeting of the open yesterday, your humble servant and another person with whom he ekskursirovali new and previously obscure point data type
Gave me the presentiment year ago overgrown with sedum, are nearby.Now turnIphiclides podalirius(precisely there, watching in person).
AndParnassius apollo(likely because the caterpillar feeds on stonecrop, and the species is known from the Vladimir region.).
Vladimir generous Meshchora such "discovery")))

14.06.2015 23:00, Shamil Murtazin:

By drawing only to navigate. Thank you for your determination.

14.06.2015 19:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyralis farinalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.06.2015 19:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

14.06.2015 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, I do not put their own definition, you probably made a mistake :)

14.06.2015 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euclidia triquetra Euclidia munita.

14.06.2015 18:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, but the question was empty, both types can be on apple. In Pandemis cerasana doll is very different. :)

14.06.2015 16:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Apple, Alexander, apple =)

14.06.2015 14:04, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Polygonia c-album.

14.06.2015 13:55, Yuri Semejkin:

In Populus maximowiczii (poplar Maksimovic)

14.06.2015 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Duc they'll group. Or who suffered after the message? If so, people leave the answers to the messages supposedly moved.

14.06.2015 12:59, Peter Khramov:

Butterfly collects within one thread? Came a new interesting game, to the site has not yet laid out, if anyone ought to - reportedly can make even cheaper than Magazev (in which, in general, on this matter too, the price is quite a Nuys).
ZY With traps is dull, with nets less muffled, "soon to be". As always, yeah))

14.06.2015 12:50, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!

14.06.2015 6:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caterpillar taken on supplementation for receipt of adults?
Not an idle concern: the caterpillar has a double "one to one": Gynaephora selenitica (Esper, 1789) : http://insectamo.ru/hete/99-hete/lymantriidae/1215-gynaephora-selenitica
Fly both types at the same time, live in the same habitats and caterpillars eat the same set of host plants.
In this case, it is helping to establish the truth only removal of adults.

14.06.2015 6:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

14.06.2015 6:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.06.2015 6:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.06.2015 6:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.06.2015 0:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes sooner we see on dolly. If this pavlinoglazki Jankowski, the cocoon will must be- stakanovidny red-brown color.
By pavlinoglazki Diana (Rhodinia fugax). Kurentsov writes that the caterpillar Rhodinia fugax very similar to Rhodinia jankowskii and develops it in July and August on Quercus mongolica. Just cocoon her yellowish-green.

13.06.2015 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pandemis cerasana / Zoran Bozovic Pandemis dumetana / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapeta hamana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergey Demyanenko.

13.06.2015 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.06.2015 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.06.2015 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergey Demyanenko.

13.06.2015 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergey Demyanenko.

13.06.2015 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.06.2015 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Charanyca ferruginea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I came here to the contrary, it is a very high degree of probability Rhodinia, caterpillar characteristic. Photo caterpillars Rhodinia fugax, on the network a lot, but they are not suitable for me, for all ages. A jankowskii, there is little, but the ones that found 1: 1, although the site is not very much. :(.
Let's wait for the butterfly. :)

13.06.2015 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

13.06.2015 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

My visionChoristoneura hebenstreitella

13.06.2015 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caterpillar with a tree?

13.06.2015 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Melanargia epimede this Far Eastern appearance. :)

13.06.2015 20:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia galathea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 20:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia galathea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2015 16:05, Vladimir Deryabin:

Similar to Melanargia epimede - Melanargiya Forest.

13.06.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This bear as a species can actually say "translucent" (a very faint, translucent pollination). In my opinion there is more pertinent still white background.

13.06.2015 12:16, Yuri Semejkin:

If you do not look at the background, something like normalno.Voobsche Shamil, your butterfly in front of you, you see the color intensity, -svetlee or not. Here and create it as it is. Personally, I try to stick to the principle of natural coloring. If darken or lighten up too, it can be said that a butterfly in the world there ......

13.06.2015 11:15, Shamil Murtazin:

dark, huh?

13.06.2015 6:23, Alexander Belousov:

Chic them! Let all survive!

13.06.2015 2:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Apparently yes, and the rest did not fit. There is truth to the sources of disagreement. In particular, food supply do not match and the lifetime of the tracks. And strong!
1. Proceedings Gornotaёzhnoy stations Volume III. Vladivostok, 1939. Here Kurentsova, p. 161 states ... The lifetime of July and August the caterpillars feed Phellodendron amurense Rupr.
2. Keys to the insects of Russian Far East.Volume V, part 2, p. 627 where the lifetime of the tracks: End of September-October. Because feed is also referred to only Amur cork.
Dr. of information not found.
Alexander! If you have others. Sources, throw or send a reference. I would like to read.

Let's go back to our "goose". On it we have a lifetime of caterpillars in May-June. The spread of a significant (see. Sources).It seems to speak of the existence in nature of many generations, and 2. Here is the first generation. Left out of his butterflies will lay the tracks and the second, which will coincide with the sources.
Now feed.In this case, fodder plant Quercus mongolica, noted that earlier in the 40406: Rhodinia jankowskii If not specified anywhere, the Mongolian oak is a new food plant, which is not uncommon.
Now we have to wait for the butterfly, which finally decides everything.
There are others. Speak opinions ....

12.06.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, a group .....

12.06.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40583 group.

12.06.2015 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Antheraea lampei / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

12.06.2015 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea lampei / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.06.2015 23:07, Shamil Murtazin:

we so cold that night, I collect all the butterflies hands =)

12.06.2015 22:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On personal observations are extremely difficult to capture the form:
Moths fly day zigzags and very rapidly, often rising to a considerable height.
And on top of all this, never sit down ....
In short, I run about, jump from a net for windbreak these beauties today's glory)))

12.06.2015 21:42, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander, I hope that someday will be the top:) ... although they are very capricious, Pomerleau nemeryannom

12.06.2015 20:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Pandemis cerasana?

12.06.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Galka is not removed (((
I can only swap that also nekuzyavo .....

12.06.2015 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.06.2015 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.06.2015 20:00, Alexander Belousov:

The top of the wings talking about? !! :-)

12.06.2015 19:30, Alex Dumchus:

The Third Age

12.06.2015 19:28, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea lampei, Nässig & Holloway, 1989

12.06.2015 18:32, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!

12.06.2015 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia jankowskii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia jankowskii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia jankowskii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia jankowskii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 17:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.06.2015 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.06.2015 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Spiris striata / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Spiris striata / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 14:48, Shamil Murtazin:

hairiness fell =)

12.06.2015 13:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Rose slightly

12.06.2015 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kirinia roxelana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 11:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2015 10:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

12.06.2015 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiblema sticticana / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

12.06.2015 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Herminia grisealis / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

12.06.2015 9:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cystidia stratonice / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

12.06.2015 6:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36179 group.

11.06.2015 13:41, Alexander Belousov:

I completely agree. A window may come up on the page, add a photo to identify and confirm Name? Just will enter as the date or location. But something must write a comment. :-)

11.06.2015 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diarsia ruficauda / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

11.06.2015 13:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Diarsia ruficauda (Warren). Determined: Matt AJ ZIN

11.06.2015 13:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Herminia grisealis

11.06.2015 11:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2015 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perconia strigillaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

11.06.2015 11:10, Nikolay Grebennikov:

probably as a subspecies?

11.06.2015 10:46, Basil Sergienko:

It Perconia strigillaria, that would remove the doubt, I called I.Kostyuku, he confirmed that there is such kind of Staudinger described in this form is a subspecies or a form, I do not know

11.06.2015 9:06, Fedor Ovechkin:

Photo # 36183 and # 36179 photo - clearly one and the same instance. Please merge into one group!

11.06.2015 8:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

11.06.2015 8:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acleris forsskaleana / Igor Sakhno Aleimma loeflingiana / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2015 22:50, Vladimir Deryabin:

On the wings of a butterfly are present orange patches.

10.06.2015 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Samia kikibudiamini,U. / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.06.2015 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Samia kikibudiamini,U. / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.06.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyura galaxia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.06.2015 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyura galaxia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.06.2015 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea celebensis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.06.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

See. Synonyms.

10.06.2015 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea celebensis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.06.2015 20:53, Alex Dumchus:

Samia kikibudiamini,U. Paukstadt, L. H. Paukstadt & Suhardjono, 2002

10.06.2015 20:49, Alex Dumchus:

Polyura galaxia

10.06.2015 20:37, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea gschwandneri, Niepelt, 1918

10.06.2015 18:01, Andrei Komrakov:

Epiblema sticticana (FABRICIUS, 1794)

10.06.2015 15:56, Nikolay Grebennikov:

ATP)

10.06.2015 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Synaphe antennalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2015 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, reduce det. and leg. apply labels to save space, and as an international mark marking identified and collected the specimen. Therefore, the application on the site does not make sense. and in my opinion is a parody of scientism. :)

10.06.2015 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

08.06.2015 18:46, Peter Khramov:

We rush Aki night express!

08.06.2015 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.06.2015 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.06.2015 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.06.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.06.2015 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2015 6:27, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion it Parasa hilarula (Staudinger).? Age etak 2nd.

07.06.2015 21:47, Shamil Murtazin:

Left = 138 species)

07.06.2015 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idaea aversata / Nikolay Grebennikov Scopula ochraceata / Basil Sergienko.

07.06.2015 18:45, Basil Sergienko:

It Scopula ochraceata

07.06.2015 12:03, Alex Dumchus:

With svezhachkom us this year at all empty, and so every year is getting worse and worse. A fresh zazhirivalis mainly Pandora, sometimes large tortoiseshell.

07.06.2015 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pour boiling water, ruining the material (in this case, the butterfly dampen and become a nepoymi that).
Classic: the bottom of the desiccator wet sand (you can wet the cotton), then the top folded in several layers of blotting paper, napkins, toilet paper, etc. It will take time, but will be qualitatively.Alexander, I was not referring to dry material, and "svezhachok": when out on raspravku stains immediately. Often in this case, the butterfly after some time drying zazhirivaetsya. It's not guess .....

07.06.2015 8:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cystidia stratonice / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.06.2015 3:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Cystidia stratonice (Stoll, [1782])

07.06.2015 3:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Cystidia stratonice (Stoll, [1782])

07.06.2015 3:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Detail sheet defined Volynets EB (SNA to. G.-m.n.) Biology and Soil Science FEB RAS like Aristolochia contorta (kirkazon twisted (at secondary and tertiary venation).

06.06.2015 21:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loxostege sticticalis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

06.06.2015 20:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Loxostege sticticalis.

06.06.2015 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

06.06.2015 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyta luctuosa / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

06.06.2015 20:19, Alex Dumchus:

No, Basil, much as I raspravil- butterflies probably no less than you.
I will say the less well lesh vnutr- zhiryatsya the less, and most importantly - do not pour boiling water. Now I try to pour on the softening of the hot tap, but not kipyatok.Potom closed and can be spread through half a day.

06.06.2015 17:12, Shamil Murtazin:

Tyta luctuosa?

06.06.2015 17:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Loxostege sticticalis?

06.06.2015 17:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Loxostege sticticalis?

06.06.2015 16:04, Nikolay Grebennikov:

17 mm wingspan.

06.06.2015 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ariadne merione / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2015 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ariadne merione / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2015 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They often without injections zazhirivayutsya. For example: our Pavonia. All I got pin-zazhirilis (and our revelers is the same thing-zhiryatsya without injections. Here everything depends on the species and not of injections. In this case, only the "Shoe" in aid (

06.06.2015 7:29, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. I always do. Just got killed already. By the way, some of the revelers and Saturn after injections zazhirivayutsya. Checked.

06.06.2015 1:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, he has a similar http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/p_dis.htm P. perundulans Swinhoe, 1897, but he has a form of PC costal margin at the apex a few others., And the teeth on the outer edge pronounced .

05.06.2015 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Sergey Novitckiy.

05.06.2015 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Sergey Novitckiy.

05.06.2015 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Without geography doubtful. :(

05.06.2015 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

05.06.2015 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phyllosphingia perundulans / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2015 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phyllosphingia perundulans / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2015 23:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Phyllosphingia perundulans geography, our website has a subspecies Phyllosphingia dissimilis perundulans

05.06.2015 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If a butterfly with a mattress, and this happens when I edit Alexander advise one way to avoid such increases.
It should be a little hold in a desiccator and then take insulin syringe with warm water and squirt a little into her chest (stabbing with the underside of self-a), and then again in a desiccator.Substantially increases compliance wings: checked (important not to overdo it) :)

05.06.2015 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

The fact that the victim, yes, that Callambulyx diehli - no

05.06.2015 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callambulyx rubricosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2015 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callambulyx rubricosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2015 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Callambulyx diehlihttp://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/c_die.htm?
Painfully killed (Alexander, like?

05.06.2015 18:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Ok !

05.06.2015 18:10, Alex Dumchus:

Soon my piri third molt go, then posmotrim- similar or not

05.06.2015 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

05.06.2015 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Udea decrepitalis / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

05.06.2015 17:40, Andrei Komrakov:

Udea decrepitalis (Herrich-Schaffer, 1848) - identified Jaakko Kulberg.

05.06.2015 14:13, Yuri Semejkin:

It is the same, but younger. The difference in the week. It added to the overall performance, despite not so good quality.

05.06.2015 13:44, Yuri Semejkin:

The determinant of the DV Saturnia - only S. pavonia; S. pyri does not appear. It is necessary to wait for the butterfly.

05.06.2015 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Blue warts just at pyri. But it's kind of like Sinev not on DV. I went through all of Sinev for 40 of the region: none fit. Maybe you have pyri in fact, despite the Sinev: I do not know (((

05.06.2015 13:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes I watched already. Partly like a Saturnia pyri, but it just seems like. There are no separate parts, maybe it is age-related.
I will continue to look for.

05.06.2015 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pavlinoglazki (Saturniidae) some. We must withdraw. Yuri, look at your geese, the Far East.

05.06.2015 12:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Forage Quercus mongolica (Mongolian oak)

05.06.2015 10:32, Yuri Semejkin:

There are oddities in the world, or patterns. Where is the line, sometimes not ponyat.No question she decided ...

05.06.2015 10:10, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Crambus lathoniellus.
Area # 7. European southern taiga.

05.06.2015 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It says first of all that straightened species on the site to be as photo The underside is very much to be said in many cases, and in general it is better to show the overall "habitus" :)
Yuri, really pure coincidence: just like she sensed that she had to fly me to the balcony on the night of June 4, 3 :)

05.06.2015 8:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia hierta / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.06.2015 8:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia hierta / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.06.2015 7:17, Alex Dumchus:

Junonia hierta

05.06.2015 0:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Excellent! Now the gap by type of site remedied. This is not clear why the gap, look # 40382-you will not see the 2nd of this image.
As for # 40359 and # 40360 because of which all the "fuss" has gone, the need for them is now no longer necessary. Peter, I hope you will agree with the removal.

04.06.2015 20:52, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio dialis ?

04.06.2015 20:41, Alex Dumchus:

It seems to me that this Atrophaneura aidoneus, varuna and nox smaller wings and they pokruglee

04.06.2015 19:56, Andrei Komrakov:

Synanthedon formicaeformis (ESPER, [1783])?

04.06.2015 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just as "to order" last night to light bestowed :)

04.06.2015 16:05, Alexander Kuzmin:

Erannis golda very variable, may be straight sling, can be curved. From E. jacobsoni different difficulty - marked narrowing of the edge sling from the top of the wing to the rear edge and strongly convex root sling.
Here E. golda:



But E. jacobsoni:



Both definitions are checked.
In my opinion, the photograph still E. golda.

04.06.2015 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hasora sp. Next, pass (

03.06.2015 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudosciaphila branderiana / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

03.06.2015 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pseudosciaphila branderiana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

03.06.2015 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vlad Proklov.

03.06.2015 20:32, Igor Sakhno:

The rare case when the caterpillar and butterfly are alike!

03.06.2015 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia cyane / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2015 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia cyane / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2015 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I also agree with the definition Matov since appeared straightened. And my question is eliminated.
For comparison photo The underside of my male collected in train May 24 this year, and we have only two species of the genus.
Spread into the main gallery not become due ulёtannosti instance.
Just compare :)

03.06.2015 17:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I personally agree with the definition of dull, and therefore transferred the photos to mind, but in the Primorye Territory, wrote Vasily, 6 species, who can knows your fauna better, come to a different opinion. :)

03.06.2015 17:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander ! A more specific on the other. You can believe? I would like to see.

03.06.2015 16:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Caterpillar on food plants Celastrus orbiculata (celastrus rotundifolia)

03.06.2015 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2015 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aldeksandr, well, that was not kept and has remembered me (
To expose at least one copy. independently and accurately and then straightened budeschem have the full moral right to criticize someone else's raspravku ...
In your gallery no one straightened butterfly at the moment and, therefore, the work of others you have no right to criticize.For example: very much want to see a definitive sign of how important the rear fenders in species Noctua exposed you, but do not have such a possibility ((
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/10807
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39660
I'm sorry, but simply started to hurt your butting is not childish. Not serious....

03.06.2015 13:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Well I do not mind. Peter straightened prowess, so the site does not spoil.

03.06.2015 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I do what I do not delete. :) As, in order to exercise, I do not know, I'm sorry to ruin vain. The site displays all kinds of photos at once, and any poor-quality picture, roofing in nature, whether in the expanded form, each time will catch the eye. This is not the forum where seeing and photo goes on the back burner and it will only see the meticulous :).If you set out to create a collection, then gradually start to spread. then as a prompt. if these unfolding in aid for defining, then yes, but it is better to insert in the comments, then they will not be seen on the pages of the form. I'd like to have all kinds of high-quality photos are presented.Yuri, you're persuading yourself or me? :))) It does not matter whether the butterfly shown in nature, and then in the expanded form. and has a value of quality characteristics for determining if the reverse side of any. :)) This is my personal opinion and of course you can do as you see fit.besides, in this instance there may be other views (I have the species of) :))

03.06.2015 13:26, Yuri Semejkin:

The site is almost all the pictures I have odinochnye.A and live and Dried. Though bad, but straightened

03.06.2015 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Svetlana, dozens of species in the family, you need to watch what types are known from the point of catch, and then try to determine what kind of look.

03.06.2015 13:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! I do not get me yet. Like all do as they say, and there is no result. They say practicing on cabbage or some ragged. . But they still have to catch.
It took off because there are such. Especially with the underside - are all one and the round spots on without HCC. Compare underside 40360.
There are normally straightened, and then delete these.However, if you feel that they have no place here, you can remove seysas I do not mind.

03.06.2015 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri :))) must be of puts straightened. You Vasily competition lineup. :))

03.06.2015 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calliteara pudibunda / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.06.2015 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calliteara pudibunda / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.06.2015 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calliteara pudibunda / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.06.2015 12:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Probably it is possible to transfer to Calliteara pudibunda. AY mats Zoological Institute, thinks that this is it. He writes that it is common in Europe, but in the Far East is less common conventional.

03.06.2015 10:56, Svetlana Shchavelina:

But this - not Arhopala centaurus there too? She is also the top of the wings was as the blue-violet splash.

03.06.2015 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.06.2015 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.06.2015 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Arhopala centaurus(inaccurately)
I do not know even whether such a transfer-picture view .....
A painting of them have already shown she really amazing.

03.06.2015 9:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arhopala centaurus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2015 8:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.06.2015 8:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phiaris palustrana / Igor Sakhno Celypha lacunana / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.06.2015 8:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apotomis betuletana / Igor Sakhno Hedya pruniana / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.06.2015 8:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Defining wrong.

02.06.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, tomorrow I will upload unfolded. Too few came to light today :)

02.06.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2015 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Calliteara sp.
In the region of 6 to 40 species.

02.06.2015 22:46, Maria Pozdnova:

Thank you, Alexander and Peter.

02.06.2015 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.06.2015 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anisodes absconditaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.06.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anisodes absconditaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.06.2015 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mellicta alatauica Melitaea britomartis.

02.06.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mellicta alatauica Melitaea britomartis.

02.06.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mellicta alatauica Melitaea britomartis.

02.06.2015 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mellicta alatauica Melitaea britomartis.

02.06.2015 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mellicta alatauica Melitaea britomartis.

02.06.2015 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mellicta alatauica Melitaea britomartis.

02.06.2015 17:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Caterpillar filmed on Salix abscondita (Willow secretive)

02.06.2015 17:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

02.06.2015 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

02.06.2015 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

02.06.2015 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

02.06.2015 17:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

02.06.2015 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

02.06.2015 16:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 16:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 16:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 16:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 16:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

02.06.2015 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.06.2015 16:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.06.2015 16:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.06.2015 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

02.06.2015 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

02.06.2015 16:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.06.2015 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chloroclystis v-ata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

02.06.2015 16:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Electrophaes corylata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

02.06.2015 16:06, Basil Sergienko:

Chloroclystis v-ata

02.06.2015 16:05, Basil Sergienko:

Electrophaes corylata

02.06.2015 12:02, Peter Khramov:

Made.

02.06.2015 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

02.06.2015 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

02.06.2015 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2015 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euproctis similis.

02.06.2015 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.06.2015 9:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypochalcia ahenella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.06.2015 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.06.2015 9:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mary, we are constantly illustrated pages species. But responsible for this are not always in the network. Illustration can be made from a few days to a few weeks. Patience. :)

02.06.2015 0:22, Maria Pozdnova:

And you can make the picture in the description of the type, too?

01.06.2015 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nedoraspravlennoe, when leaving the pupa, lower left wing. Ugly.

01.06.2015 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put determined the Jury is brought definition to the site :)

01.06.2015 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra pyramidea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

01.06.2015 10:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Kirkazona near there, and not many people like wild ginger. Lyudorfii In addition, a couple ognёvok and everything is possible. Is really more a caterpillar rolled up into a tube sheet. But it failed to grow.
Well, if it does not, it means not destiny.

01.06.2015 9:16, Shamil Murtazin:

this finger to the sky =) "your" seaside butterflies love aristolochiaceae (same wild ginger), I, if gusyanka refused to fruit trees, it is usually eaten or violet plantain ...

01.06.2015 9:02, Nikolay Grebennikov:

OK.

01.06.2015 9:02, Yuri Semejkin:

If offhand, the mugwort and pobegonosnaya, Asarum Siebold, sedge grass and ordinary, -I do not know the name, too, probably because of sedges. More celandine, nettle, cinquefoil, violet and so on.

01.06.2015 8:34, Shamil Murtazin:

And from herbaceous?

01.06.2015 8:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Right from the fence forest. Of these feeds do not. Growing birch, oak, elm, ash, euonymus sacred, walnut, two types of lime. While I can not say. so she chose something.

01.06.2015 2:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, I'd say that this copper-butterfly ... Podalirius although there are similarities.
But feed them rugged. Sam would probably leaves plucked from the garden that is: raspberries, cherries, apple, cherry, plum, turn and diluted the "grass" alfalfa, broom ...
Or maybe she was going to have to pupate, that creeps?

01.06.2015 1:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Amphipyra pyramidea. Determined Matov AY

31.05.2015 23:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mary, thank you for the tip. :) Rhdostrophia sieversi lives in Turkey and the Caucasus.

31.05.2015 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhodostrophia discopunctata.

31.05.2015 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Rhodostrophia discopunctata.

31.05.2015 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, it zhiritsya instantly. There is nothing to do, alas (((Spread half an hour after the capture ..... A wash-krambid worse to do. My opinion is that for any kind of straightened material on the site should be. The more copies of my not so many ulёtany here.
P.S.If somebody will put this view raspravke better quality, it is possible to remove the photos. Not mind.

31.05.2015 23:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2015 23:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2015 23:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acraea violae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

31.05.2015 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, if you say that the site has not been straightened instance, let it be and was not. But zazhirevshuyu female, fi. :)

31.05.2015 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

That I, Burcu, about the quality of the material in the photographs. In Photoshop to add anything not necessary.

31.05.2015 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nicholas, this butterfly Basil correctly defined, you have a bug.

31.05.2015 21:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, this has turned out badly. Add in Photoshop did not ...

31.05.2015 21:34, Shamil Murtazin:

In the brain slug like =)

31.05.2015 21:30, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

31.05.2015 20:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lampides boeticus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2015 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cabera leptographa / Nikolay Grebennikov Perconia strigillaria / Basil Sergienko.

31.05.2015 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cabera leptographa / Nikolay Grebennikov Perconia strigillaria / Basil Sergienko.

31.05.2015 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aedia funesta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2015 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aedia funesta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2015 19:48, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

31.05.2015 19:11, Basil Sergienko:

And the band is there, it just nedookrashenaya, that is not so

31.05.2015 18:43, Nikolay Grebennikov:

and where do you see the second sash on the front wing?

31.05.2015 17:53, Basil Sergienko:

Well, with Cabera is not standing, in my opinion it Perconia and if by the blue of your region's nothing else that strigillaria

31.05.2015 17:46, Nikolay Grebennikov:

bilateral type, but that's who it -samets?

31.05.2015 17:34, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Yes, the left wing is less than the right)

31.05.2015 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ginandromorf like?

31.05.2015 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.05.2015 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.05.2015 16:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Photographed at home

31.05.2015 16:00, Alex Dumchus:

Acraea violae - 100%

31.05.2015 14:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Taken on a metal fence dyeing. It seems that it has nothing to do here, probably infected others. Insects. Took just in case, hoping to get a butterfly can not so much how to implement the parasite.
And other possible option., - Was blown away by the wind from a nearby tree. Then the form is needed, or at least the family to pick up the food.
Opinions are?

31.05.2015 14:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Clear. Thank you, Alexander!

31.05.2015 14:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are four perelivnitsy, three tracks are exactly, a quarter do not know. and at least two on willows. Just wait for a butterfly :)

31.05.2015 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

No mustache, of course, looks kalechno.

31.05.2015 9:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Basil! It looks like she did. Now let's wait for the butterfly.

31.05.2015 7:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thymelicus sylvestris / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

31.05.2015 7:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thymelicus sylvestris / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

31.05.2015 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apatura ilialikely.
Certainly better supplementation and get imago.

31.05.2015 2:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Caterpillar filmed on Salix taraikensis

30.05.2015 23:59, Igor Sakhno:

May be I do not know. But she kept taking off and sit on it alone, although there is a lot of that circle grew.

30.05.2015 23:39, Maria Pozdnova:

Similar to Rhdostrophia sieversi

30.05.2015 23:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Could "feel out the situation," but did not postpone (the plant is not, or rather, something to him was not so).

30.05.2015 23:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Th. sylvestris, male

30.05.2015 20:31, Igor Sakhno:

Especially because I fotkal material commercial exhibition, and they were not up to the label.

30.05.2015 20:27, Igor Sakhno:

Something herbaceous, I do not know. And judging by the impression the folded abdomen, she eggs are laid, the eggs themselves but I have not seen.

30.05.2015 18:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctua orbona / Alexander Belousov Noctua interposita / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2015 18:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctua orbona / Alexander Belousov Noctua interposita / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2015 18:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctua orbona / Alexander Belousov Noctua interposita / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2015 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea cinxia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2015 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea cinxia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2015 14:03, Alexander Belousov:

Let's do it.

30.05.2015 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.05.2015 1:21, Irina Nikulina:

Caligo memnon?

30.05.2015 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

29.05.2015 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, you're there put a lot of butterflies and Noctua orbona too, it is light, dark (this) rather interposita, can certainly be a surprise, I did quietly transferred to inaccurate to interposita. But first I would like to hear specific objections. V.Sergienka have the same opinion.

29.05.2015 19:07, Alexander Belousov:

Raspravka at Biola

29.05.2015 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, poudalyal.

29.05.2015 7:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena tityrus / Confidently identified / Female / Marija Jaunkunga.

29.05.2015 7:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena tityrus / Confidently identified / Female / Marija Jaunkunga.

29.05.2015 7:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena tityrus / Confidently identified / Female / Marija Jaunkunga.

29.05.2015 7:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena tityrus / Confidently identified / Female / Marija Jaunkunga.

28.05.2015 18:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Always happy to help.:)

28.05.2015 18:33, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!

28.05.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.05.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.05.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.05.2015 17:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sclerocona acutella.

28.05.2015 17:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.05.2015 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea pallidata / Zoran Bozovic Scopula subpunctaria / Basil Sergienko.

28.05.2015 15:14, Basil Sergienko:

It Scopula subpunctaria

28.05.2015 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.05.2015 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

28.05.2015 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.05.2015 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.05.2015 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.05.2015 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.05.2015 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.05.2015 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.05.2015 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.05.2015 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

28.05.2015 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, they also are active at night. A day of rest in the grass quietly :)

28.05.2015 8:55, Shamil Murtazin:

and I arrived to me yesterday on the screen =)

27.05.2015 22:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Igor, on what plant it sits?

27.05.2015 9:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Eupithecia absinthiata ?

26.05.2015 19:46, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Thank you, Basil!

26.05.2015 10:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2015 10:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2015 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2015 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2015 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2015 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2015 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

26.05.2015 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

26.05.2015 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

26.05.2015 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

26.05.2015 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

26.05.2015 10:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

26.05.2015 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

26.05.2015 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

26.05.2015 9:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ematheudes punctella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2015 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Metzneria lappella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2015 9:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Metzneria lappella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2015 9:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Metzneria lappella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2015 1:48, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, still a little bit in the removal of duplicates)

25.05.2015 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fixed.
Vladimir, the two groups merge into one nelyazya and can only add new photos to the group one by one.

25.05.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40235 group.

25.05.2015 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40236 group.

25.05.2015 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

25.05.2015 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

25.05.2015 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, unfolded and spread you? I definitely do not like. I do not see specific characters. Sam would opredilit differently, but not exactly the same. I'll wait straightened. :)

25.05.2015 19:27, Alexander Belousov:

So that? There remains?

25.05.2015 18:36, Peter Khramov:

You mean that there are unknown species? Bo if you know, you do kanesh foty, if possible. And if you do not know - it is necessary to look to citizens who rummage in the subject ...

25.05.2015 16:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pheosia tremula / Svyatoslav Knyazev Pheosia gnoma / Irina Nikulina.

25.05.2015 16:12, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, you just look and you will understand everything. There's a photo of boxes with butterflies. If the form is still not illustrated - I can make a photo.

25.05.2015 15:35, Peter Khramov:

So I do not understand if your foty, it can be shipped to the site, and if not yours, why view?

25.05.2015 15:33, Peter Khramov:

No, but it could not affix them because he did not realize how much the order of files in a downloadable archive does not coincide with the order of the photos on the site.

25.05.2015 15:21, Irina Nikulina:

And is notPheosia gnoma?

25.05.2015 15:04, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Can not add the group to the numbers 31437, 31438, 31439, 31888, 31889, 31890, 31891.

24.05.2015 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Something a lot from Zoran Bozovic uncertain, but could not determine the fly off?

24.05.2015 21:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sclerocona acutella.

24.05.2015 21:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.05.2015 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterodecta felderi / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

24.05.2015 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Timandra griseata / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.05.2015 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The "Systematic list of" Macrolepidoptera "of Moscow region" (last edited on January 19, 2011) by Vlad Proklova T. griseata is not at all as a species. So as it is not present here: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/794-geo11
In my opinion suburban certainly necessary to carry comae. And on this specimen. I put the point is already clear.

24.05.2015 14:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Pterodecta felderi (Bremer,1864)

24.05.2015 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fixed. It yesterday I forgot to untie to the end)

24.05.2015 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

24.05.2015 12:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, thank you, corrected.

24.05.2015 12:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, being on a page of photos in "Other photos of this kind of" empty. Error some?

24.05.2015 12:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, you look you too =)
I was referring to species which are not illustrated on the site, but which are on display in our National Museum.

24.05.2015 12:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, on that page, here are a visual difference, I would say all three comae, and this exactly comae.

24.05.2015 11:54, Peter Khramov:

Links come.

24.05.2015 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, here is the link: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=338765&view=findpost&p=1239723
It shows a very interesting quote in this regard. I repeat here:
"More recently came the work of Kyle L. and A. Albrecht [Kaila, Albrecht, 1994] dedicated to the audit of the group. The authors have shown that T.griseata found only in a limited area - in the south of Scandinavia, the Baltics and Northwest Russia (Leningrad, Karelia). All information on the findings of T. griseata in other regions of Europe, including the European part of Russia and in Western Siberia (Novosibirsk region.) And Turkmenistan, according to these researchers [Kaila, Albrecht, 1994] should treat T. comai Schmidt, 1931, which has been described as a variation of Spain T. griseata " (original spelling). There are already is not a valid reference to the work itself.
On this basis to griseata here include only one photo of Boris Laryushin: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/9836

24.05.2015 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil on mobiole talked about the visual difference species of this genus with a high percentage of accuracy and cited examples of photos (if I remember correctly :), really do not remember what the topic may at Sterrhinae).

24.05.2015 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Comae all the same in my opinion? I raised the issue of half-forgotten. According to some reports griseata only likely in the region 8. And significantly, these two types differ only in the genital.

24.05.2015 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Timandra comae / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.05.2015 9:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysgonia algira / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.05.2015 8:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, you filled out, under the photo, as it is written, and get an error.
The time and place / fishing : time and place for a live butterfly photo:
The time and place of fishing: for a collector's item. You do not. If you can not read the label does not speculate, that does not write. Write only what you know for sure.There is a field the author's comments there and write what they think. :)))
As for "leg." and "det." how to have Basil international standard abbreviations for the labels to save space. In our case, a lot of places :) and introduce international reduction in Latin, understandable only to entomologists are not appropriate.Simply indicate in Russian: gathered and to determine . But any author the right to write as he pleases. :) If you want, what would you write all understand Russian, unless entomologists, then in Latin. :)

24.05.2015 6:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In this case, and should begin in private, but not here.
Without hints and appeal to third parties (to you). Questions for me (photo) - and then I'll answer.
Delete - seriously offended.

24.05.2015 2:19, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, who you're talking about?

24.05.2015 0:13, Peter Khramov:

Basil, how my words and how many times to repeat? With slinging - in private. When in private do not agree, then here or me.

23.05.2015 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You know how something, and this thing is who forgets or does not know how :) So I somehow just such schools and correct)))

23.05.2015 22:52, Shamil Murtazin:

The date of the date of shooting at the exhibition. The exact time of collection can not be installed without opening the box, which is closed tightly.
The group know how to combine. If you are not in the group - so different instances.

23.05.2015 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah you do not understand here and the date alone. Remove from group.

23.05.2015 22:47, Shamil Murtazin:

I do so and the collection of a doubt ... It plates do not all have and others do not read - a box does not open, and hanging on the wall.
Let me everywhere Migranova bear and everything =)

23.05.2015 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.05.2015 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, I understand that gathered Migranov MG and it is determined?
In such a case it would be better to write the following comment of the author: "leg. Migranov MG, det. Migranov MG."
"leg." - assembled such.
"det." - identified such.

23.05.2015 22:39, Shamil Murtazin:

It's three different butterfly (instances)

23.05.2015 22:39, Shamil Murtazin:

it is not necessary to the same group. they are different copies.

23.05.2015 22:38, Shamil Murtazin:

I have not knowingly. The collection like this:

23.05.2015 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #40216 group.

23.05.2015 22:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Same. Whose underside?

23.05.2015 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, whose underside is?

23.05.2015 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.05.2015 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.05.2015 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.05.2015 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.05.2015 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.05.2015 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

23.05.2015 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.05.2015 22:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Someone else would have looked, maybe I overlooked that.
Here all the photos exposed butterflies, there are not many (archive photo of 9): https://yadi.sk/d/fUkb3GExgpsXw

23.05.2015 22:12, Shamil Murtazin:

female

23.05.2015 22:12, Shamil Murtazin:

male

23.05.2015 22:12, Shamil Murtazin:

male

23.05.2015 22:12, Shamil Murtazin:

male

23.05.2015 22:11, Shamil Murtazin:

male

23.05.2015 14:23, Peter Khramov:

Have a lot of questions, but I solved only small things, and not all, because still I can not get out of the dam at work. Nifiga no time at all. How to choose - all poreshams, but for the time being in any way. I think in May I can take a break from work, but no blockage was in May.Summary: all the moves are recorded, and all the pile, but for that I need a break in the main, which is no.
As for the stones in the garden, Basil, write immediately to Alexander mail or call me on Skype, and sort it out face-to-wall, where there were stones, and where not, okay?

23.05.2015 13:54, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

23.05.2015 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, for Europe there is no alternative: the only species Aporia. The amount varies, it)))

23.05.2015 13:40, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Basil!
But this individual is twice the size of those that have already shown here. It is no less swallowtail.

23.05.2015 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

23.05.2015 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

23.05.2015 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dysgonia algiraandDysgonia torrida(preference is given to the first)
I do not know just who is the most likely for Bulgaria at that time.

23.05.2015 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aporia crataegi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.05.2015 22:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, the question is solved in two galleries? I was very mentally tiring for low-quality pictures points. It is sad to watch at the same time interesting and high-quality photos, pictures appear nedoraspravlennyh, broken materials, banal sorts.

22.05.2015 16:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here, the male, the female there :)

22.05.2015 16:26, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!
It turns purple moth I have shown here (# 32855).
But there was a large fan 32855. Nor is it the same species?

22.05.2015 16:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lythria purpuraria / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.05.2015 16:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lythria purpuraria / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.05.2015 6:51, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

22.05.2015 6:50, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

21.05.2015 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

21.05.2015 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

21.05.2015 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea cinxia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.05.2015 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pararge aegeria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.05.2015 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is a question to Alexander)))
His 3-type could be and I (pronuba, fimbriata and interposita) they all fly in the second half of the summer (until July). 8 These and orbona, but her we had never seen before. She has only one flight of my region in June))
Butterfly on a photo for an early Noctua based on the date and guess what the true definition.But the last word all the same leave for Alexander: he had them, I think knows better)))

21.05.2015 18:28, Alexander Belousov:

Yeah!

21.05.2015 18:12, Peter Khramov:

And confirm anyone as well.

21.05.2015 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I do not insist (and because of its geography dictates did not drive, but just noticed).
It's just this kind which can be no doubt in geography automatically)))

21.05.2015 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Delivered to the form similar photo females, which are made at one time and in one location. Image quality can not be determined with certainty. The author does not faithfully carries information from other sites, or Posted in General, for some reason, does not indicate the right, leaving her wrong, or does not indicate who defined. The eye and the eye is needed. :))

21.05.2015 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nemophora cupriacella / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Adela reaumurella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.05.2015 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

View defined on http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?md=read;id=110323, the author of determination Ruedi Bryner.

21.05.2015 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nemophora cupriacella / Zoran Bozovic Adela reaumurella / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.05.2015 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nemophora cupriacella / Zoran Bozovic Adela reaumurella / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2015 9:16, Peter Khramov:

However, the data are entered into the label, and not speculation, yeah.

21.05.2015 9:15, Peter Khramov:

Ok, glitches and duplicates removed.

21.05.2015 8:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, I have here can not - kind of added http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120697 - forgetting that sort, then no :(. Put that formed crap! And I would add "humanly" genus and species to it
Now.

21.05.2015 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All three species are bezetiketochnye photo. It is not good (((
But it is found in nature only in the kind of woods, along the banks of a volcanic lake located in the Italian region of Lucania)) Distribution of the species is very limited.
Although not rule out the fact that the eggs / larvae / pupae were brought ...

21.05.2015 0:52, Peter Khramov:

But writing in the geography of Italy, of course, impossible.

21.05.2015 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is safe to write in geography, she's from Italy. Besides Italy, it is not anywhere else. Endemic, however))

21.05.2015 0:01, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, well, maybe inaccurate deliver? ... I actually thought that they were from different genera, and more than 38,037 per female Adela reaumurella like. No? And the color of pubescence palps is not very visible, indeed it is dark, like violellus. Although the author writes that his 2 sites identified, including lepiforume ..

20.05.2015 23:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/9515 I nakosyachil (((. Infa duplicated in "Time of flight of" and "Forage plants caterpillars" There should be remove unnecessary

20.05.2015 16:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Generally, in all three photos Zoran Bozovic, this kind of, I have no confidence in the correct determination.

20.05.2015 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.05.2015 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.05.2015 16:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.05.2015 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Dim, well above link also has a list of the corrected automatically.

20.05.2015 12:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

You can then put the list and correct, that it was evident that appears. I probably something will happen if there is not one copper-butterfly and tolstogolovki

20.05.2015 8:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.05.2015 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.05.2015 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.05.2015 8:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.05.2015 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male.

20.05.2015 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.05.2015 8:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago / Andrey Ponomarev Male / Vlad Proklov.

20.05.2015 8:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago / Andrey Ponomarev Male / Vlad Proklov.

20.05.2015 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.05.2015 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.05.2015 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.05.2015 1:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 1:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 1:10, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 1:10, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:55, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:54, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:53, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:51, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:49, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:48, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:46, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:44, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:43, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:43, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, poudalyal.

20.05.2015 0:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:41, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:41, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:40, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:40, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:33, Irina Nikulina:

Caterpillars

20.05.2015 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:28, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:28, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:27, Irina Nikulina:

Caterpillar and 2 more

20.05.2015 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:26, Irina Nikulina:

pupa and 3 more photos in the form of

20.05.2015 0:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:25, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:25, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:24, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

20.05.2015 0:22, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

20.05.2015 0:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Larva Imago.

20.05.2015 0:15, Irina Nikulina:

imago

20.05.2015 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Larva Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:11, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Larva Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Larva Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Larva Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:09, Irina Nikulina:

pupa

20.05.2015 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Larva Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Larva Pupa.

20.05.2015 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

chrysalis - and 3 more in the form of

20.05.2015 0:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

20.05.2015 0:00, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Imago.

19.05.2015 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa / Larva / Zoran Bozovic.

19.05.2015 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa / Larva / Zoran Bozovic.

19.05.2015 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

19.05.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

19.05.2015 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

19.05.2015 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

19.05.2015 23:45, Irina Nikulina:

Well, until then poudalyat numerous available) 13. Today, more stages and at the right kind of put everything)

19.05.2015 23:28, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:25, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:19, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:16, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:16, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:16, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:15, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:15, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:15, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

imago

19.05.2015 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

19.05.2015 20:07, Igor Sakhno:

Thank you!

19.05.2015 20:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysocrambus craterella / Tentatively identified / Igor Sakhno Thisanotia chrysonuchella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.05.2015 19:56, Igor Sakhno:

Big doubts about the definition.

19.05.2015 19:56, Igor Sakhno:

His doubts are not accidentally wrote under that photo.

19.05.2015 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Why not, washes be useful feature, people are not so rare in the letters ask, they say, some photons are missing (not for this topic, but in general), it will be easier to view ...

19.05.2015 17:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Super. Radio button interface could not put, that people are not confused - because the technical functionality. I forgot to write)
PhotographyCallophrys butleroviMigranov, 1991 I'll get the same! =)

19.05.2015 15:39, Igor Sakhno:

Big doubts.

19.05.2015 13:15, Peter Khramov:

Did. Now, instead of a flag "picture" has two radiobatona - "picture" and "no pictures".
http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55&photo=y - Only species with photos.
http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55&photo=n - Only types without photo.

19.05.2015 12:21, Igor Sakhno:

Ah, well then so ;-)

19.05.2015 10:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Still, with the flag of "no photo" would be more convenient.

19.05.2015 2:30, Peter Khramov:

Zoran offended by the fact that when downloading a large number of photons in one archive, foty in LC are not sorted in order. Grit will no longer ship as long as I do not fix this thing. So for the time being the new takes not expect.
Alexander, I even did not stick a in the situation. How to stick a - pochirikaem.

19.05.2015 0:38, Irina Nikulina:

For a long time was going to mark duplicates in the gallery Zoran enough patience .. 63) (according to the medal))) There is a triple (with this it is necessary to do something. If there is no certainty that more of this will not happen again (but it did not) then maybe, just at another staging view, which puts (among certain it's just to do).The works will be less, and then later to catch - a lot of time is spent.

18.05.2015 23:27, Peter Khramov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55 - here's a link to a group of geography, which can be clearly seen, for whom there are illustrations, for whom not. At the top of the total number of species.
http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55&photo=y - here it is the same, but showing only the illustrated species. At the top again, the number is.
I think it first without tolstogolovok, but if I can fight them - better yet, just do them.Also ph primarily need infa about the flight of time, the second - wingspan / length of front wing. But foty important.
With regards to the truck - it would be good not just foty species, but foty all the different options (top / underside, male / female forms, etc.) if they are very different from each other.Strong - it is as a form of levans spring / summer or blues male / female, with some blue and the other brown.
The determinant is not intended tree structure. As a basis we take the Old, which is already in the catalog. Basis - geography (region of Sinev) plus color (but not as it is now, but more appropriately, perhaps, broken down into podpriznaki).Supplement - time volley, size, specification of the taxon (eg, family, if it is obvious).
Ie Here is the link to http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?color[]=10&tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55&rgs[]=10&photo=on worked in full, not just now.

18.05.2015 22:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

The females of both species yellow. :)

18.05.2015 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.05.2015 22:03, Igor Sakhno:

I noticed that his head of yellow, while fastselly, like, black.

18.05.2015 20:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, come on specifics.
What kind of group is selected as a reference?
What the 125 species? .. To link to query the database on the butterflies of the reference group without illustrations. Type Countdown online.What exactly it is necessary to fill in for them in addition to the photos? (time of flight of, wingspan, distinguishing marks, fodder plant?)
Determinant, it seems to me, implies some kind of tree structure. Where are we going to take it? Well, that is What we take as a basis the determinant?

17.05.2015 21:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Igor, why did you decide that it can be Nemophora prodigellus ?, I do not know this kind, and in Ukraine, it seems not.

17.05.2015 20:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

17.05.2015 19:56, Igor Sakhno:

I guess it's all the same Nemophora prodigellus?

17.05.2015 18:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ecliptopera silaceata / Vitaly Gumenuk Eulithis prunata / Basil Sergienko.

17.05.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

17.05.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

17.05.2015 10:13, Peter Khramov:

Figase.

17.05.2015 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leaf rollers (Tortricidae) from the tribe Archipini, perhaps, what that Clepsis.

16.05.2015 23:30, Igor Sakhno:

In general, in Russia today do not forward. Perhaps only a convenient opportunity.

16.05.2015 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Subacronicta megacephala / Tentatively identified / Shamil Murtazin Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.05.2015 22:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Vasily, do not know why not rumicis. There are true keys? )
Should inaccurate so that ...

16.05.2015 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ecliptopera silaceata / Vitaly Gumenuk Eulithis prunata / Basil Sergienko.

16.05.2015 10:27, Basil Sergienko:

It is likely, too E.prunata, I would image the back of the image without the top of the same specimen. I did not put.

16.05.2015 10:20, Basil Sergienko:

It Eulithis prunata

16.05.2015 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hadena bicruris / Zoran Bozovic Hadena perplexa / Basil Sergienko.

16.05.2015 8:55, Basil Sergienko:

It Hadena perplexa

16.05.2015 6:35, Basil Sergienko:

Why not A.rumicis?

16.05.2015 5:21, Peter Khramov:

ZY As for the pictures, you do not have enough of 125 species. However, it would be good kanesh still different angles and variations.

16.05.2015 5:19, Peter Khramov:

I propose to close up a reference group, which will be for everyone, or almost every kind of a nice set of illustrations and formal features, so that you can out of it was not just zababahat catalog and directory-determinant.To be able to enjoy the show and people - out, they say, how can it work, then other groups will be easier to collect the Old together with the people. If you share and approve of, let podnapryazhemsya and add illustrations and signs for it.Who has infa - spread it with a priority for those species for which it is not yet on the site (especially the illustration). If you do not have pictures, but you know who has an acquaintance - poagitiruyte to posted. If you just saw on the web - write in the subject reference, I will refer to the authors requesting publication.If we manage to complete section illustrations and formalized signs (luckily, geography, by and large, is already there, and the times during the flight of many), it can turn a good online qualifier. And let's not songs about genitals.Limitations I think everyone understands, but the opportunity to make an adequate sample quickly and accurately will still be extremely useful.
What do you think?

16.05.2015 2:32, Peter Khramov:

And what kind of troubles with the shipment? Ukrpost no longer comes to the Russian Federation?

16.05.2015 2:30, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

16.05.2015 1:01, Irina Nikulina:

caterpillar

15.05.2015 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Ilia Ustiantcev.

15.05.2015 19:17, Alex Dumchus:

Well, yes, it was a long time ago. In the 70's. Stradomsky can confirm if you remember ... we had studied in the same school

15.05.2015 18:43, Igor Sakhno:

Yes, send us right now is problematic. Rather, all this nonsense would be dissolved. I can not imagine pyri 20 cm. This is - in the classically straightened form?

15.05.2015 17:22, Alex Dumchus:

It's amazing. I visited the males up to 14 cm in scope, and one of the females in childhood to 20 cm. If the Gren, ready to buy to bring up, apple and pear trees enough, although it is probably up to you to hell that you pereshlesh- Well in Ukraine?

15.05.2015 17:08, Alexander Belousov:

The colors in the image as in the moonlight!

15.05.2015 14:17, Alexander Belousov:

Well, of any race, tribe?

15.05.2015 10:05, Igor Sakhno:

Alexander I had also thought that all weighty - female. Here are this year hatched ones I 1st age exactly the same feed. The greatest cocoon - 6.5 cm appeared cocoon of luxury male.Females hatched also rather big, but at least a few millimeters, they were smaller than the male, and this was almost the same size of the front wing with other males. And last year, all three females were somehow much smaller than males.

15.05.2015 6:25, Yuri Semejkin:

And do not be lazy to spend time .... Not everyone would want to mess around.

14.05.2015 23:54, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

14.05.2015 23:54, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

14.05.2015 22:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Yura! I will remove any logo, wherever he razmkschalsya, without a trace! ;)

14.05.2015 21:59, Evgeny Komarov:

That is about the reaction and expected :)! If real, it is necessary for modern monitors, ie at least 1400 high. Vasily rights, people should - soprut :)

14.05.2015 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, it is overdone, and what to do now? What you do not understand Peter? Actions prescribed steps, painted in detail? I double-click "Change Parent" on page genus and subfamily, and the result was the opposite. I can write, what to do but how to do it, I do not know.

14.05.2015 19:15, Alex Dumchus:

Above Saturnia pyri, bottom Acherontia atropos

14.05.2015 19:12, Alex Dumchus:

Igor, I did not say it exactly, but look at the size. Caterpillars and pupae males Saturn, usually smaller and slimmer. However pokazhet.U time ... I now have a pear doll - I think too female. I go on to compare the photo with a dead doll head

14.05.2015 18:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

It - neopredelenka for a long time. :(

14.05.2015 17:54, Igor Sakhno:

And how do you define on a caterpillar, it is the female?

14.05.2015 14:01, Peter Khramov:

I think we now have the normal ratio mutilation signature image and protection.

14.05.2015 12:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Not bad happened!

14.05.2015 11:07, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Yuri allowed himself a little liberty poshamanil with Photoshop. Here's what happened:

14.05.2015 0:55, Yuri Semejkin:

As for the theft. Nothing do not interfere to put the logo (mark) on snimke.Tolko not scratch where it can be easily removed without any trace of its former presence. And if you put it on the body of the butterfly, then remove a label without damaging the stolen picture is slozhnee.Ne every thief will want to mess with this.- It will be easier to apply to the author of the picture.

13.05.2015 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who should soprёt photo, regardless of its size. The people of this (((
With thieves not uzhimaniem sizes are struggling, and an angry letter to the site administration where spёrtoe found.
If something does not work abuzy hoster who lives this website, quoting the original. Both methods are tested and in most cases are a great success.
So, what to do)))

13.05.2015 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Hey, this is voluntary. You can even ship 800x600 or less. There is talk of the possibility of granting tokmo.

13.05.2015 21:03, Evgeny Komarov:

OK!

13.05.2015 21:01, Evgeny Komarov:

On the one hand - well, but given the ungodly theft pictures online ... Figure it knows.

13.05.2015 20:26, Alexander Belousov:

Yes, no one does not want us to send. I have been taking. The truth has risen in price everything's cool! Because you went, but alas! All too long.

13.05.2015 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Somehow at this point in time)
But this is not only butterflies (unsorted folder, so the screen):

13.05.2015 17:00, Peter Khramov:

Attempts to combine different approaches seems to be ... There is no attempt to integrate different databases / sources ...
Cross-references, essno not needed. It should be the main allocation of names and synonyms prisobachivanie him / generic kombinaktsy.

13.05.2015 16:58, Peter Khramov:

In Entomone Nikita Stoll took?

13.05.2015 16:47, Peter Khramov:

The bottom line is that if you have access to five, the fuss on the site is not particularly why there is already all kinds of cloud storage and other such nonsense. Although, if you do katalozhek convenient, then, yes, then we have to be here yet.Offhand: but who can post jobs in a library of common? I'm here all the scans, perhaps a dozen. And even less.

13.05.2015 15:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, is there, but it is a very low percentage. kuratarami removed manually. 15 will be at the computer fix.

13.05.2015 15:45, Evgeny Slobodskoy:

Thank you, Irene.

13.05.2015 12:13, Alexander Belousov:

Damn, too late! I have issued an order, I immediately sent the score and I have already paid. The next time Peter try directly!

13.05.2015 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sinev I personally put a few times. What then I put on the form. And so I stopped. Sinev No way, too (((

13.05.2015 10:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Our attempt to combine different approaches to classification results in a fair mess on the website. Here's an example: Rod Chazaria - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/13675 one kind Chazaria incarnata Freyer, 1838. Information on the site is not on it as the photo. At the same time online, there Heliothis incarnata (Freyer, 1838) - the same kind of way but Heliothis - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7186 illustrated and provide information. I am sure that this is not an isolated case.What to do? As an option - the cross-references in such cases.

13.05.2015 8:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sinev here somewhere lying, as I recall. Or it can be, and others can not? Access is needed strictly limited.

13.05.2015 6:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I corrected and the problem familiar .....
This is because of the hyphen in the title of this stuff going on. And anyone else, which is written with a hyphen will be ((
Peter must be corrected: on this issue, I also wrote on April 22 here: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/1288

13.05.2015 5:54, Alexander Belousov:

Again joke with the placement of the picture. The designer as a Xestia c-nigrum, and left undefined. Miracles!
On the registration page title goes without a hyphen, may therefore? Under the image you can see.

12.05.2015 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If the closed version - then both hands.
Although generally on molbiol have a theme for many years and there is no one like no bite: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=54556
There really subtitle: "links to scans of books and articles on the network"
Maybe it's to just not to peck?
A spread these scans the network and then give in this thread links upon all and sundry :)

12.05.2015 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris dulcinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2015 20:51, Alex Dumchus:

I fully support Shamil.
Each fun to watch his collection, not someone else's, and ambition, as I understand it, the site was not much affected.
That section of the exchange / sale would be interesting to so many, it would be advertising, and photos exhibited, I talked about this to Peter a couple of years ago ...Yes, there is a section Molbiola, but there prices in osnovnom- "Mom can not!", And people close to pure commerce and no relation to collecting no, nemeryannom. The atmosphere is completely different, sometimes each other and dirt do not disdain. Here are Peter and would create an alternative

12.05.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apamea monoglypha / Vitaly Gumenuk Mniotype satura / Basil Sergienko.

12.05.2015 19:53, Basil Sergienko:

Does not A.m., it Mniotype satura

12.05.2015 19:48, Shamil Murtazin:

But who could it be but theXestia c-nigrum?

12.05.2015 19:46, Shamil Murtazin:

IMHO, it is no menyalok / prodavalok - the interest will not be ...

12.05.2015 19:04, Peter Khramov:

Yes, all the cylinders can be a separate topic, or start the same in the direction of blogs already starting to look a long time had the idea Well ... We pokumekat.

12.05.2015 18:57, Peter Khramov:

As for the garbage to the literature (based on recent discussions in the medicine cabinet). The essence is this: either make a very private option (ie, for example, to limit as tough as the system area on the number of people), or to make general insolently without restrictions.No restrictions - the likelihood that zaklyuyut official, is not very large, but the people would be offended (authors) and in general is not very kulyutorno will look. The image and all the cases. Ie It is significantly worse than other people foty upload without permission, and we do not even this does not allow. With regards to the level of the system area - I do not know, maybe it's worth it.For our convenience, you just. Again, there infu and some on the site can be centrally spread ... but does it and if you do, the website or not - the banner.

12.05.2015 18:53, Peter Khramov:

People, do you think, can we consider that section "does not go"?

12.05.2015 18:49, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hee hee ... I mean ... I usually try to head the shot hit :)

12.05.2015 18:49, Peter Khramov:

Yes, good.

12.05.2015 18:48, Peter Khramov:

Remove excess.

12.05.2015 18:46, Peter Khramov:

Well, I'll let myself just send e-mail, its people Well almost! -)

12.05.2015 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Selenia dentaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2015 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gothica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2015 16:34, Irina Nikulina:

Selenia dentaria

12.05.2015 16:33, Irina Nikulina:

Orthosia gothica

12.05.2015 16:15, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you. Sure wish you less!

12.05.2015 16:14, Alexander Belousov:

It appears this is - "the other end".

12.05.2015 11:30, Irina Nikulina:

Spring generationPieris dulcinea(The first generation melete a yellow background and yellowish underside ZK top of the PC and usually a brighter orange spot at the root of the LC).(Never been able to photograph the butterfly on flowers Lloyd trёhtsvetkovoy not imagine how it is such a tiny and fragile, the butterfly stands)) By the way, the small size of the butterfly spring speaks for Dulcinea, Meletus first generation of bigger. Eugene, and it is certainly not Aporia hippia, how do you define on http://macroclub.ru)

12.05.2015 11:07, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Fumbling in the source code, I found another such angle: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40069
On the other side - there is a photo ...

12.05.2015 11:02, Peter Khramov:

I will make a failure, all the rules.

12.05.2015 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diurnea fagella / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

12.05.2015 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diurnea fagella / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

12.05.2015 9:30, Alexander Belousov:

Photo rotated clockwise, and everything becomes clear.

12.05.2015 9:02, Svetlana Shchavelina:

... long thought: as butterfly wings wrenched so ... and now dawned that it is, I simply photographed behind ???? and the wings as expected, are normal ???

12.05.2015 7:20, Alexander Belousov:

Peter, how do I cancel an order? Almost two weeks to respond - it's cool! Yes, and I'm at the office can not see anything. I'll be back in proven locations.

12.05.2015 1:33, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Andrew! Already in Gelechioidea and began to look and broke his head)) Do not dig ..)

12.05.2015 0:29, Andrey Ponomarev:

Diurnea fagella

11.05.2015 12:34, Basil Sergienko:

37363=37730

10.05.2015 6:03, Alexander Belousov:

This goose has read does not consider it before pupation. Therefore I do not bother. And call. ind. I shoot with LDS lamps, ring them, there is no shadow. Two lamps of different diameter, one above the other. And staff.

09.05.2015 12:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes OK. Just consider the top gusyanku prevents glare and the side sort of like white stripes have any.
The site is not familiar with all, sorry. So tactfully: "criticizing - I suggest".
Regarding makrooborudovaniya - made a fiber flash. Tested. Without lens provides just such a shadow: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40039

09.05.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes worth Abby Lingvo x5, it is a good thing, but it's kind of a dictionary.
And fully translate the document on the machine does not work in it. And Promt translates whole files at once: simply download the file and exit the text already translated completely. Maybe even as a seed packet to click a lot of files at once in order.

09.05.2015 12:10, Peter Khramov:

A Linguistic nothing left?

09.05.2015 7:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Came all 14.

09.05.2015 6:56, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you, Shamil! I usually do not do anything (http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/40051). In general, I try to shoot without issk. lighting, but not always possible. A reflector, sometimes in macro, just nowhere vystavit- blocked lens. Who was shooting "butt" understand. And, so, I then by a profession - the photographer. Since 1986. :-) truth now video over my bread.

09.05.2015 1:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way: a good translator, powerful: anyone recommend nalo.
It puts everything: documents Word, web-pages, documents, PDF, e-mail, IM messages, presentations Power Point, tables Excel, documents OpenOffice. Short for all occasions.
Essno machine translation, which must then edit away.
Ehh ..intelligible to the biological-English-Russian dictionary to find him: in general the prices have not been ...

09.05.2015 1:05, Peter Khramov:

Well, you, too, know what I'm talking about Thomas, and not about Eremu -)

08.05.2015 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, you know that against every disease there is a cure were treated .... :) The question is where to take this very Dictionary and the rest ..... trick. I can not find a (

08.05.2015 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Oh, well, it's too expensive ...

08.05.2015 22:06, Shamil Murtazin:

To remove the deep shadow at the bottom of the picture - you can try to put a reflector in the form of a white sheet of paper or, more generally, the foil (not only the color, otherwise it will stain the caterpillar).

08.05.2015 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, God be with him then. Close the question :)

08.05.2015 21:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, in this situation, you are very correct. :) Pose the question for consideration, nothing on insisting. I do when I can not imagine a situation that you would put someone else's photo. The exception is the picture of Vladimir, who during his life lecturing himself, and now puts Irina.For one photo Regal person to whom the photo and the site is also not care, I do not do not care, and indifferent. :) Is not necessary. The species is not a lot on the site. And the quality of photos is not great, but still the editor. for me more against than for.

08.05.2015 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, it was just the one particular case where the need to be exceptions.
Do you think that I am able to skopipastit from another site, or something to offer it? A bad example.I have more than enough of their own material and the collection is constantly updated for several decades))) Yes, and just: I know what you can do and what not)))
Namely, this photo was taken personally for me and sent me in the mail just for me to determine the type.Well, I saw that the views of the site does not just illustrate his proposed knowing that people will not refuse me :) This photo nafig it is not necessary. And indeed the butterfly is likely to have long been sold on ebay :)

08.05.2015 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

How then, perversely, it is. He does not want people that rape, there were assistants who for the site from other sites took photos, trying to help. In my opinion, there may be exceptions, but that is not the case.

08.05.2015 18:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Laugh laugh, but the issue date. It's not even all of these Google-shmuglyah. There is often a need to drive through a translator pdf document for the purpose of translating text from one language to another.
That's the question: if someone uses, for these tasks PROMT Professional 9.5? Prog easily understood pdf and its translation.If someone uses something where to take him to the competent biological dictionary? I'm trying to translate using regular profile "science" and it turns nonsense (((
Already searched: do not?

08.05.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

1 photo? Even thought this did not come :)

08.05.2015 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe biriviata / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

08.05.2015 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe biriviata / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

08.05.2015 17:48, Alexander Belousov:

Prinyato.Ispravlyayu.

08.05.2015 17:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Now you have to remove one subspecies. :)
Alexander, determined the quote just under the photo instance that you have identified all the others you have already determined. :))

08.05.2015 16:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ematurga atomaria / Female / Alexander Belousov Heliomata glarearia / Imago / Basil Sergienko.

08.05.2015 16:43, Peter Khramov:

Just when lazy - it is possible for him zaregatsya and from his ship Akka, and the whole business.

08.05.2015 15:58, Alexander Belousov:

Ah! What a handsome man turned out!

08.05.2015 15:56, Basil Sergienko:

There really is such a supply, but as this butterfly, the I.Kostyuk could well define because it is-Heliomata glarearia

08.05.2015 14:47, Andrei Komrakov:

Xanthorhoe biriviata (Borkhausen, 1794)?

08.05.2015 8:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.05.2015 7:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycia hirtaria / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

08.05.2015 7:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Phigalia pilosariaMore like ...

08.05.2015 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Duc hirtariya is in my opinion. Just variability.
Of Lycia there except it has pomonaria and zonapia and in my opinion they disappear. True Zonaras never seen ((
Let's wait what else people will say.

07.05.2015 23:27, Shamil Murtazin:

size likeLycia hirtaria, but not like (

07.05.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I do not know, Peter. why. This Lech, which is full of the truth of the material here photos from my collection. I offered him a long time, does not want zaregatsya. He is not a photographer (other roles) - you know. I think he will not mind if I lay))

07.05.2015 19:53, Peter Khramov:

He does not want to, because he leinvo or it does not want to, because I do not want to shine?

07.05.2015 14:15, Alex Dumchus:

From our very often Pandora zazhirivayutsya

07.05.2015 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.05.2015 12:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry already zazhirilsya directly on raspravilke 2 days (((
Photos unfolding now have to wait until otmoyu (((
Why is wrong with them? Terribly disappointing: after a lead (((
More Saturnia pavonia such suffering and some of our revelers ..... seems to get pin and on you (((

07.05.2015 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I should be unprocessed: Do not dispose of the originals usually :)

07.05.2015 12:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, this is just my opinion, others may agree with you. :))
But his image editor you have already handled :(

07.05.2015 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He does not want signup. Do not - then do not.
Just kind of good I do not know is whether the online-(((. My job is to propose, if the photo had happened.
Endromid something just enough to swear on our website only versicolora is.

07.05.2015 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, invited the authors to register and upload a photo image. If you do not want to, then do not create a precedent.

07.05.2015 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Available literature does not guarantee the correctness of the determination, especially photos. Excusable not to expose some photos to photographers whose species, to put it mildly, is not the first place. But put an indefinite collection material, it is not a good tone, and can only be an exception (this is my opinion).In the literature, the main thing: the diagnosis of the type, distribution, image of a butterfly and her genitals. Since all the normal determinants Nenashev on the language, the diagnosis can not be read, and if you read something that does not clear, Google is not taxis. Distribution always helps. Pictures are good, but the quality of scans? remain genitals. Who cooks? there are not many.Why strike site, creating a library of pirated scans. This is necessary, I think, would get all their own. :)))

07.05.2015 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This photo is already on the site is, if I am not mistaken: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39904
Eugene again remind about the date)) Please do not forget to put down. It is of great importance.

07.05.2015 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.05.2015 10:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Make the closed library for moderators / active participants. And people will be pulled.

07.05.2015 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually I dug at and found a photo of the Far EastMirina christophi

I sent it to identify people in the winter. And suddenly there was an idea to take the author's permission to publish and to lay out here. Do I have confidence that I will not deny the author))).After all, the site is no single type of photo and the photo I had lying around and do not spread because it is someone else's.
That's decided to ask no objection if I'll post this image with permission in its LC?

07.05.2015 9:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euphyia unangulata / Igor Sakhno Epirrhoe alternata / Basil Sergienko.

07.05.2015 7:21, Basil Sergienko:

Epirrhoe alternata

06.05.2015 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not worry. Over time, if not imposed here, so it will be imposed elsewhere :) Vaughn Shipunov lives quite normally with his library. I respect people who are treated by greed. Sam would have downloaded a pdf or djvu ......

06.05.2015 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Dima! What about copyright? !! Worthless here and so to take and apply here! Though even for the sake of determining ognevok to type!

06.05.2015 15:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Buy a penny and put it here to determine !!! And I'm gallery ognevok Borneo done, specific to the species!

06.05.2015 14:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

06.05.2015 14:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

06.05.2015 14:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

06.05.2015 13:03, Alex Dumchus:

I would have bought determinants Rhopalocera the tropics at a reasonable price, such as: "Butterflies of Thailand" publication Monastery and Devyatkina about butterflies Vietnam ....

06.05.2015 12:48, Alexander Belousov:

Abruptly, the whole process. I had all the images on a single sheet post as comics. According to the chronology. It is more convenient to treat. :-)

05.05.2015 23:50, Peter Khramov:

And not, not here. Grit, zamuhalsya look for, behold, they say, and now we can help others.

05.05.2015 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Well, the preliminaries, certainly penny!

05.05.2015 20:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ah, how much it will cost (((.

05.05.2015 20:08, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Announcement: finalized for publication edition of 'A Preliminary Guide to the Pyralid Moths of Borneo', author Dr Stephen Sutton. Publication of first instance is expected in mid-June 2015.

05.05.2015 19:20, Alexander Belousov:

I'm on the threshold of hell! Cool! I will wait.

05.05.2015 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Exotics in the general understanding of the mean. "From there," -So "not from here")))

05.05.2015 16:49, Peter Khramov:

From there?

05.05.2015 16:49, Peter Khramov:

No, a review is needed of the fact that the client has passed all the circles of hell, and finally received the goods! You can pour out to me directly.

05.05.2015 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have to soak all kossid (((

05.05.2015 15:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not necessarily zazhiritsya, but 80% - yes.

05.05.2015 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The experiment was successfully completed here this boy :)
It's a pity one thing for a very fast drying time after the butterfly (like all carpenter) must be covered with a thick layer of fat, and it will have to degrease gasoline .... It is inevitable, alas (((

05.05.2015 11:50, Alexander Belousov:

Where anger pour :-) to the store? Previous post goes like an angry review?

05.05.2015 10:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Stenoptilia, from a set of species for 8 in the region, something of bipunctidactyla / mannii / pterodactyla / stigmatodactylus, if you cook, you will be certain that some of them, and so the image can be inaccurate to pterodactyla.

05.05.2015 10:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Type has no name has not yet been described. Description may be delayed for years. :)

05.05.2015 9:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's Nematopogon sp. indeed, but I can't identify the species.

05.05.2015 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dahlica triquetrella / Tentatively identified Not identified.

04.05.2015 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Svezhachok (assembled today at 21:45) :)) Here, too, one specimen. in terms not do because of the variability.

04.05.2015 23:06, Peter Khramov:

What about the species? Refresh my memory.

04.05.2015 23:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well something good .... The main thing that was determined to be there ... Otherwise Cemetery uncertain replenished at a heightened pace. I do not put Malaysia means full because that is the definition of the zeros (((

04.05.2015 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Guys, say something...

04.05.2015 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Ok. Nice species.

04.05.2015 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's all right, I guess: http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/antigonus_funebris_specimens.htm

04.05.2015 22:42, Peter Khramov:

Guys, confirm it please.

04.05.2015 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, seeing the order. Yet to be contacted for two reasons:
1. Now the Russian holidays that will end only tomorrow.
2. Work with foreign deliveries now goes through the ass, and, unlike the Russian Federation, I would not influence it directly, but how much influence - affected.
The second point is much more important than the first. Ie Russia would all have long been rung and negotiated.Summary: After the holidays from us will touch on delivery to Kazakhstan. If it is easy, I would get, by the way, comments on this topic to kick the charge once again.

04.05.2015 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.05.2015 14:42, Alexander Belousov:

She's modest pelt me. I am afraid that is not infected appeared. Too much!

04.05.2015 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

04.05.2015 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

04.05.2015 14:14, Shamil Murtazin:

Positive gusenichka =)

04.05.2015 13:37, Alexander Belousov:

Mark as "education".

04.05.2015 12:58, Alexander Belousov:

Ay! The store people are, or just a robot? Four days do not know send me something thread or not? Order №21419. You'll excuse me, I'm here for the first time ordering, can and should be?

04.05.2015 10:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia cerasi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.05.2015 10:02, Basil Sergienko:

cerasi

04.05.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

04.05.2015 8:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.05.2015 23:49, Irina Nikulina:

Orthosia cerasi?

03.05.2015 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spirama sp. Can't get it further (

02.05.2015 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.05.2015 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Penthophera morio / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.05.2015 17:30, Vladimir Deryabin: This species is identified correctly.

02.05.2015 16:01, Vladimir Deryabin:

Upload photo # 39950. 39941 In the photo the same butterfly.

02.05.2015 15:51, Vladimir Deryabin:

Fly three of these butterflies. The photos were taken on different plants. I not follow, and now I can not say for sure whether these pictures is the same individual. The photos were taken by different lenses - that's not follow during their shifts.

02.05.2015 12:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Gypsy moth caterpillars on the fodder plants Populus maximowiczii. These tracks in the vicinity of Vladivostok from year to year, becoming larger and larger. Earlier this year celebrates on Lloydia triflora and Hepatica asiatica.

01.05.2015 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This second generation, collection of mid-July 2014, however))
We still have nothing. Rain, cold and disgusting (((
Here are last year's collections, and delivers that did not have time to deliver. Tropical tired at the moment, and until the winter of the soul is not one of them is.

01.05.2015 21:23, Shamil Murtazin:

Ieh thought straight from the tin. Today, just some Golubets seen. The second day of the heat, and they already fly)))

01.05.2015 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, how to understand this: "individuals may have different" ? These pictures in the group did not one and the same butterfly? Unleashes a group or not? The fact that the group of pictures should be only one and the same individual. And I have been doing online correction groups. Hence the questions.

01.05.2015 20:29, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Alexander!
It is necessary to clarify that individuals might be different.

01.05.2015 18:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago / 0000-00-00 00:00:00 Penthophera morio / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov / 2015-05-01 14:38:10.

01.05.2015 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Penthophera morio / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.05.2015 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helloides / Tentatively identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

01.05.2015 15:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Found about bonded with cylinders of paper: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28541. Peter, comments can be a "vyrezaykami" here to copy / move?

01.05.2015 15:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Nice haircut =)

01.05.2015 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Variability, however))) It's like a collection, if it is possible to assemble a series, then one copy. terms should never be limited)) Example of a three-day-old: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39878 They are different. Same thing with orthoses.

01.05.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why is that?

01.05.2015 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date and geography taken from stoprotsentogo double this picture, which has been deleted.
Earlier it looked as: 1914 -04-00 00:00:00; Serbia, Vojvodina, Srem district
I think this is the most logical. In 1914, still did not know exactly what makrofotogratsiya, the more color and even more in the digital version)))

01.05.2015 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

1914-04-00 00:00:00 2014-04-13 21:00:00.

01.05.2015 7:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

30.04.2015 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Yeah.

30.04.2015 23:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is also one instance think in terms not do))

30.04.2015 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gonepteryx aspasia / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

30.04.2015 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter prowess at leisure here this double: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/37924
It is not duplicated here simply slipped)))

30.04.2015 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, good luck in breeding. I wish to receive a female :)

30.04.2015 21:00, Andrei Komrakov:

The caterpillar in my cage, but I think in the comments and Alexander also pointed out visually clearly differs from the tracks Scardia boletella.

30.04.2015 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, don't forget about photo groups. Join the photos...

30.04.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39933 group.

30.04.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alcides liris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.04.2015 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alcides liris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.04.2015 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is plenty of it in the web. I'll add new species to the our database and move the photo there.

30.04.2015 19:38, Alex Dumchus:

Alcides liris, Felder, 1860, but I've found info about it at one source only. And there are from 3 to 10 species in the genus.

30.04.2015 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now it is clear, Alexander :)
Repetitions "Rake" is simply afraid.
Still worth the goose to take the excretion: already "afraid" of their own .....
P.S. Now I will look with chitin platform. I really want to get a female and one male fly to the light, and it occasionally.
And there is not a single female, and it is a big and beautiful)

30.04.2015 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, but different, it is possible to mix small but well-grown caterpillars are different. Zeuzera pyrina from chitin have a powerful platform, which it is not Scardia boletella.

30.04.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why is that? Caterpillars of both species other than the appearance of more and absolutely identical conditions of existence, as it turns out recently.

30.04.2015 18:08, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

30.04.2015 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, the caterpillar is collected on the removal? How confident that this is it? I ask in order to anticipate the possible "rake" (lopuhnulsya himself this way in the fall). Just I was not sure yet received the imago: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34067

30.04.2015 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, they can also say "family": belong to the subfamily Parnassiinae :)
Eugene, I have a request: please do not ignore filling in the fields "The date and time of shooting / fishing"
This information is needed, and at times vital)))

30.04.2015 13:38, Evgeny Slobodskoy:

It seems like they have parnassiusov "chastity belt" :)

30.04.2015 12:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Gonepterix aspasia

30.04.2015 12:11, Shamil Murtazin:

direct some whitish Rumney =)

30.04.2015 10:58, Yuri Semejkin:

The first egg rafting 2015.

30.04.2015 7:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #23676 group.

30.04.2015 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.04.2015 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

30.04.2015 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.04.2015 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #23674 group.

30.04.2015 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.04.2015 7:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.04.2015 7:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.04.2015 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

29.04.2015 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I then just the shape of two hands and aberrations: especially if they have a well-defined and well-established names :)
Just this nonsense about their cancellation is carried out for a long time and wondering who it is justified, how and where the .....
As an indication of the generation (generation) to each butterfly if it is possible, or it makes sense.For example, the notorious Lythria cruentaria:
Here's a typical male of the first generation: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29044
Here's a typical male of the second generation: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30101
Quite significant differences in appearance. Although they do not have scientific names, but common to most individuals strictly certain generation.
Age caterpillars also required (if applicable).Most of caterpillars with each molt change their appearance.
All this information can be very useful on the site and it should be possible for the maximum.

29.04.2015 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another example of intraspecific variation when it is necessary to set a series (limited to 3 copies.), Collected at one time and in one place.

29.04.2015 19:37, Peter Khramov:

On the case: while the field is in the form in which it is now and for the same purpose. In the future it will be possible to knit foty directly to the subspecies, and the meaning of this field is determined by itself. Form as such need. All together we remembered about Levan.
Regarding attention - Skype.

29.04.2015 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Removed from the top row at the Gothic everything. Suffered in his own, personal comment. Golf copyright comment can not touch it: it kasaёtsya specific instance of butterflies and is a one piece with a picture that is located. And what to write in it or not it's up to the author to write, which is laid out this picture.The main thing to be concerned about a particular butterfly species or to which it belongs. I, for example, each specimen. collection - you can tell the story with which anything and associated))) .....
Alexander, recently noticed a rather close attention from your side to his personality.What is the reason? An hour is not the fact that I have my personal views on certain things? Let's stop. I am not an enemy of anyone and did not intend to fight.
And yet on all the official forms, aberrations, etc. It is interested in the question in whose foolishness came up with this idea to abolish them? And check out the bottom.If it related only to the "simplification" classification is not worth it to take into account if the form or the aberration was described in the 18th or 19th centuries and has a definite author. Categorically I do not accept such moves.

29.04.2015 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander about Gothic: it really is not the same), but usually it have approx. as in the photo # 39849 (with a relatively small deviations). But this specimen. : Http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39832 in this framework does not fit with any party (ind. Lёtanny absolutely, and this is). Therefore, I make a note that this is a form of light to form a lump.I can wipe, and then let it remain nominative form (not essential).
Now, regarding the aberrations and forms of official (ie, having the authorship). They really canceled?
For example:
Argynnis paphia ab. ocellata Frings, 1902 : http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22814
Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793 : http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33853 (happens only in females).
I think that in this case, they just had to write.or three official forms from Araschnia levana: f. levana (spring) , f. prorsa (summer) : the two are described by Linnaeus and even f. porima Ochsenheimer, 1808 (autumn) ?
Another such example is a lot, and I brought the most obvious.
It is interesting to read about it.

29.04.2015 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strange transfer flew ((

29.04.2015 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2015 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2015 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Again I raise an issue on which we have committed follies, but it hurts the eyes.
Clarification classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, light shape or larva Third Age :
Refinement of the classification, only the first - a subspecies,
Forms aberration, morphs, race and other below subspecies taxon classification is not.(According to the International Code of Nomenclature). One of the reasons for this decision, arbitrary interpretation of these terms, we are now witnessing in the performance of Basil Orthosia gothica:
Classic (dark) Form
light shape

a little lighter, a little darker, all within the framework of individual variability.I think it is not necessary to invent or anything, Vasily abusing this little lot from him all forms, but in reality it is not. All within the framework of individual variability.AtOrthosia incertatwo identical butterflies there, we will come up with the name of each shape?
Age, too, no relation to the clarification of the classification has not, in the extension of the concept Although this includes generation, which may differ from one another.
My suggestion: leave this field only for subspecies. Once this clarification classification.Or call it Updates , then it is necessary to discuss what to clarify :))

29.04.2015 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To me at all if only it came and everything. But straight home to the balcony :)
Generally quite rare for us and I think I have it on, even in some QC seen (do not remember exactly) ....

29.04.2015 13:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We have recently become very rare. Not more than 2-3 units a year fishing. Previously, up to a dozen of the night came.

29.04.2015 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis cocles / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.04.2015 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis cocles / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.04.2015 7:20, Alex Dumchus:

Similarly Cyrestis cocles

28.04.2015 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, a subspecies of himself write in LC. It must be so: ssp. floresiana Fruhstorfer, 1902

28.04.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia tambora / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.04.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia tambora / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.04.2015 22:05, Alex Dumchus:

Cethosia tambora Doherty 1891
http://www.tolweb.org/Cethosia_tambora/93864

28.04.2015 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I can not find where to add the form: some "trading" sources and Wikipedia (((Here in my many incomprehensible.

28.04.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But volatility. Tomorrow even throw in a few orthoses (Gothic will no longer ship: enough). According to the old collections just decided to go :)

28.04.2015 20:29, Alex Dumchus:

Weatherbeaten V. dejone?

28.04.2015 20:17, Alex Dumchus:

Cethosia tambora floresiana

28.04.2015 20:04, Alex Dumchus:

I look at the section "New Gallery" - 50 shades of gray:))) - sad. And we have a spring in full swing. I would like bright! To begin a minute to load color!

28.04.2015 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Solved the problem: find the neighborhood has a certain top))) Lord, I beseech you: contact me, please do so immediately in a group do not have to wander here so ....
The assumption was right. Only the Americans she Archaeoprepona, however: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/archaeoprepona_c_chromus.htm

28.04.2015 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noreppa chromus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.04.2015 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36395 group.

28.04.2015 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Archaeoprepona chromus (Guérin-Méneville, [1844]) ??
Where is the top?

28.04.2015 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parantica cleona / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.04.2015 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parantica cleona / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.04.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Khalaim Yevgeniy.

27.04.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Khalaim Yevgeniy.

27.04.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

27.04.2015 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

27.04.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Sergey Titov.

27.04.2015 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.04.2015 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.04.2015 0:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.04.2015 0:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.04.2015 0:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.04.2015 0:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

26.04.2015 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

26.04.2015 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

26.04.2015 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.04.2015 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.04.2015 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.04.2015 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.04.2015 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.04.2015 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Male & female.

26.04.2015 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.04.2015 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.04.2015 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

26.04.2015 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

26.04.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago / Andrey Ponomarev Male / Vlad Proklov.

26.04.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.04.2015 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Venusia semistrigata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

26.04.2015 10:54, Basil Sergienko:

Venusia semistrigata

26.04.2015 10:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Size with a wingspan of less than 1 cm

25.04.2015 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.04.2015 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.04.2015 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.04.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.04.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.04.2015 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.04.2015 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.04.2015 11:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aleksandr, it's easier for you habitats is one kind of this kind. Differences in the wing pattern to determine the species is not

25.04.2015 10:39, Alexander Belousov:

Oleg has confirmed in a letter, and asked for more copies. on the study. What there will be is unknown? But if confirmed, it means that he has some "fishechki."

24.04.2015 19:35, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. Add packs of 5 for my previous orders

24.04.2015 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.04.2015 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.04.2015 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.04.2015 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.04.2015 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.04.2015 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.04.2015 15:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.04.2015 15:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

24.04.2015 13:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.04.2015 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callophrys rubi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.04.2015 12:37, Peter Khramov:

There are 30 packs of black pins №2 with discount 190 rub. / Pcs. If anyone needed - write / call.

23.04.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa transiens / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa transiens / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2015 22:26, Irina Nikulina:

I think itSarbanissa transiens

23.04.2015 19:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

23.04.2015 16:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips xylosteana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2015 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysoteuchia culmella / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

23.04.2015 16:03, Irina Nikulina:

Archips xylosteana

23.04.2015 16:02, Alex Lender:

Chrysoteuchia culmella?

23.04.2015 14:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In Tae need to go to the north (Chiang Mai, Chiang Rai) or very south to the Malaysian border.

23.04.2015 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, you asked a question out there))
I have not seen it post Oleg of bringing to the kind of reason (((
I removed it or what?

23.04.2015 10:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is a new word in entomology, 100% determination in appearance Egira. I have not heard it yet, but I would very much like to. :)

23.04.2015 7:27, Alex Dumchus:

Our fellow citizens, especially on long-haul destinations (why that cattle tend to not fly), an angel compared to bluish "green" Europeans who fiercely advocated the "conservation" of nature (its something destroyed!) not only that prevent catching, so also the "chattering" as Pavlik Morozov. I am convinced in my own skin, not only for the butterflies.Our then at least do not interfere with anyone.
As for Taya, the night dozhdi- is the norm there, in my opinion, anywhere and at any time of the year: in Phuket, and this spring !, watered almost every night with thunderstorms, Samui too regularly, and Chang Lilo and day . We have to see forecasts for specific regions,

22.04.2015 23:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander! All this applies only to the most popular destinations for package tourists. A turmesta I was not pulling, especially to our fellow citizens. In the summer rains in tae there, but not as much as in India or Sri Lanka. They come mostly at night, and did not last long, but very powerful !!!

22.04.2015 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter already had such a bad time of loadingXestia c-nigrum, and now it turns out like this and downloadingSatyrium w-album. Types with a hyphen in the name are not downloaded to the form and loaded into uncertain due to the fact that the hyphen in the form of downloads otsutststvuet if ship "out of form":

And to the butterfly stood at this very place comes hyphen "hammer handles"
Turn to your problem, please)))

22.04.2015 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, if as in the case of Oleg, who determined there is among the sponsors of the site: a photo can be immediately shipped to mean by his determination and marked who really defined)

22.04.2015 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's just a feeling :)

22.04.2015 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Egira anatolica / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

22.04.2015 20:02, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I've got a feeling like it's head is turned 90 degrees.

22.04.2015 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Egira anatolica / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

22.04.2015 19:03, Alexander Belousov:

Egira anatolicadet. O.Pekarsky photo

22.04.2015 19:03, Alexander Belousov:

Egira anatolicadet. O.Pekarsky photo

22.04.2015 17:05, Alex Dumchus:

I'm not interested in Phuket, there I was, and Khao Lak. It is close to Phuket, but on the mainland. And about the fact that travel agencies are 2-3 times raised, Dmitry, I think a little bit wrong. When you take a month or less, the tour operator sometimes even takes off to the plane is full, but it is usually in the charters. In the regular season, too, need to watch prices, includingand hotels, but also a friendly travel agency discount of 7-10 percent. It does. Sometimes I get a little more expensive than the cost of the tour tickets.
But this hotel, where room and board are guaranteed at least HB, and to the "wild" rest ... alas, I have not ready.

22.04.2015 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39787 group.

22.04.2015 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39785 group.

22.04.2015 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39783 group.

22.04.2015 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39781 group.

22.04.2015 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39779 group.

22.04.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39778 group.

22.04.2015 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

22.04.2015 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

22.04.2015 16:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 16:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39776 group.

22.04.2015 16:09, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Mainland Thailand and Peninsular - different in this regard. I explained, but somehow I do not really remember ... Well, roughly speaking - on the mainland - 2 of the monsoon, and the peninsular - 4 monsoon prevail. On the mainland of July - the rainy season.Also resting in September at the latitude of Phuket (just on the other side of the peninsula to the Europeans less :) - even once a week there was no rain, once only seen that far on Samui the rain comes ...

22.04.2015 15:37, Alex Dumchus:

And what we have in the summer (July) in Tae? Rains much? Who was?
My friend went to Phuket last year in August, said that only twice found the rain, and the price is off-season, is two times lower.

22.04.2015 15:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And why in Thai on Phuket to go? If only lie on the beach. Yes, and I do not take tours ever. Why pay for travel agents, if all the same I 2 and even 3 times cheaper to do it myself.

22.04.2015 15:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And I will take to Hong Kong in February for 18,000 here and there. Question where further

22.04.2015 15:18, Alex Dumchus:

Prior to February 2016 still have to live, I have such long terms planning can not. A maximum of 1-2 months. Some tickets do not take ever - only tour because I go with my wife and her health is not very ...Yes, not even about the money thing (could afford and allow on the day of a birth) but schazz we Rostov runway repair, so all departures at night, and to get to Tai, had to fly to Moscow and stuck there ok.12 at the airport hours before departure - zashib! And then fly 12 hours to Taya, and then go by ferry from Phuket, etc.And ago this same pattern.

22.04.2015 14:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thailand in February 2016- 23000, not so expensive ticket here

22.04.2015 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Sergei Kotov.

22.04.2015 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39774 group.

22.04.2015 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39771 group.

22.04.2015 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39769 group.

22.04.2015 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39767 group.

22.04.2015 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

22.04.2015 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39765 group.

22.04.2015 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39762 group.

22.04.2015 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.04.2015 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.04.2015 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39761 group.

22.04.2015 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39759 group.

22.04.2015 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas ichnea / Irina Nikulina Euphydryas davidi / Evgeny Komarov.

22.04.2015 10:36, Irina Nikulina:

Well, with the underside of doubt, of course not. It should then be combined into a group of top-underside, if one individual. In addition, during those days found in [103] in the description of the type davidi indication that a light-yellow spots and a sling may have nekot. individuals missing.

22.04.2015 7:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Irina underside of copies doubt belonging to davidi leaves. It's the same thing here # 32749. It is necessary to move.

21.04.2015 20:56, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

21.04.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrgus malvae / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

21.04.2015 18:48, Irina Nikulina:

Also I thinkPyrgus malvae, judging by the picture and the date of shooting. Of the 9 species of Pyrgus, living in Bulgaria, only 2 fly in 2 generations have armoricanus spring and malvae. The rest of the flight of time - June (July) -avg.

21.04.2015 18:19, Igor Sakhno:

Semiargus (just guessing).

21.04.2015 18:06, Igor Sakhno:

Maybe just Malvaceae?

21.04.2015 17:28, Alex Dumchus:

Already found. He returned from Egypt. Thailand and other Mexican nonche road.

20.04.2015 19:38, Zoran Bozovic:

Nematopogon sp.????
http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=114247

20.04.2015 16:42, Alexey Perelygin: This species is identified correctly.

19.04.2015 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Vitaly Gumenuk Lacanobia suasa / Basil Sergienko.

19.04.2015 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

19.04.2015 19:27, Basil Sergienko:

And that's exactly suasa

19.04.2015 19:27, Basil Sergienko:

I wonder why so confidently abandoned suasa, to these images I will not argue, but I like, suasa

19.04.2015 19:16, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, where the angle is not very good, perhaps on the expanded specimens. all became more obvious and must be attributed to the davidi .I remember that about this particular photo was maximum doubt, so all 3 and sent to you for confirmation or disagreement) / Confused then no characteristic bright points and the bond that has the images davidi (occurs as a Euphydryas sibirica davidi ) http://babochki.narod.ru/ny17.html and http://www.pteron-world.com/topics/classfication/nymphalidae/nymphalinae/melitaeini/melitaeini1.html way, and subtypes of E . s. davidi (Oberthür, 1881) and E. s.eothena (Röber, 1926) on our website is also available forEuphydryas sibirica, for the cat. also characterized by a sling and bright spots http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/12173 and http://rusinsects.com/nymph/ne-sibi.htm, the lack of which is me and confused ... Maybe in some copies. they may be absent?

19.04.2015 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I stumbled on this picture :)
This is not entirely natural rastsvetochka. She's very self-colored :)
These red spots - meconium , which highlights the butterfly after birth.An interesting quote:
"Upon emerging from the pupa, with wings still wet, young Belyanko pushed out of his bowel curious few drops of red liquid - meconium: the remains of an old meal of small caterpillars.Produced thousands of butterflies, this action gave rise to the popular belief of the "bloody rain" mysteriously watering spring orchards. "
Alain Eid & Michel Viard "Les Papillons du Monde" les editions Hatier, Paris 1996
Himself once came under a rain at the height of the flight of Aporia Crataegi. And there was a white windbreaker long time ..... then walked pockmarked :)

19.04.2015 14:40, Evgeny Komarov:

He agreed with Irina, but this week, smoothing the material here, once again rechecked. Here is an instance of no ichnea, and clear davidi (within the site), but rather inclined to the view that should be called davidi Euphydryas (aurinia) sibirica eothena Röber 1926. But it is up to a serious revision.

19.04.2015 13:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia tritaea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

19.04.2015 13:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia tritaea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

19.04.2015 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.pteron-world.com/topics/classfication/
I think it may also be useful in spite of the language features)))

19.04.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Orthosia gracilis / Andrey Ponomarev Orthosia incerta / Basil Sergienko.

19.04.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Orthosia gracilis / Andrey Ponomarev Orthosia incerta / Basil Sergienko.

19.04.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Euploea eleusina? Won't take a risk to move it to the species.

19.04.2015 12:07, Basil Sergienko:

It incerta

19.04.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, of course :) It is simply an analogy, I spent (about swallowtail).

19.04.2015 10:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you are partly right, but to be honest, I do not know what subspecies in the Moscow region, and I'm not interested. But if you're interested you can specify the subtype. Only I beg you do not have to give instructions to put down there all subspecies. Who wants to clarify the systematic position, he will clarify who is not his right.

19.04.2015 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well I will add ssp. :))) Just rationality in it do not see, why duplicate the specific name of ...
Then it is necessary and suburban Swallowtail as a sign of Papilio machaon machaon Linnaeus, 1758))))

19.04.2015 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, that is, you now write that you think clarify the systematic position superfluous, since you (personally), you know that there is nominative (in your collection there). Basil and who you such rubbish said the nominative is not written? Not written, in case if there is only a kind of nominative subspecies.And in the case where the determination to subspecies, is not essential. When subspecies is already remove it, I think is not appropriate. But I repeat if it was a species, then yes why duplicate. If you know that there is nominative, it was necessary to simply add ssp. :))

19.04.2015 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nominate subspecies (the name of the type described above), and there is no neobzhodimosti. It looks like Papilio iswara iswara White, 1842 because the name of the species Papilio iswara White, 1842 Especially for the underside was not written anything on this line.
There nominative, as far as I know. Near the site is from there and I can put a couple more and sign on the top line. But why is this?

19.04.2015 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you put the name of the species or subspecies (nominative subspecies)?

19.04.2015 9:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.04.2015 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The information about the add, I think it is not necessary.
Pinpoint problem correctly adding sources and really need not to duplicate the same sources several times.
Stepping on a rake these today, when I was doing this kind: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120686.Accumulated in the nhm and jumped several references to the same source the result is obvious ...... (((
Peter, where I wrote that it is necessary to correct (to put in the correct form).
The essence of the problem simply is that links should not be given to the types and so forth. Contained on this source, and must be given the source itself. Once: the first (also the last)))).Doubles are not needed: they only bring confusion.
P.S. Technically soblyudeie that likely could not be implemented so that only the notorious "human factor".

18.04.2015 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's just information. :)))

18.04.2015 19:04, Peter Khramov:

Correctly. To be able to distribute the curse address: -))

18.04.2015 18:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

And it would be good to display the name, who added.

18.04.2015 16:22, Peter Khramov:

Keep.

18.04.2015 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.04.2015 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.04.2015 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ideopsis vitrea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

18.04.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ideopsis vitrea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

18.04.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

18.04.2015 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39182 group.

18.04.2015 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39184 group.

18.04.2015 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

18.04.2015 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

18.04.2015 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

18.04.2015 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

18.04.2015 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Amesia sp.

18.04.2015 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vindula sp.

18.04.2015 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please pay attention to anyone who adds to the sources from time to time.
Important !!! It is necessary to add a link to on the site itself .
And not on the species, genus, or other taxon information contained on this source.
Because of the addition of later confusion.For example, a single source, which exists now on the site already in several versions add:
Invalid added:
1. Butterflies and Moths of the World Generic Names and their Type-species. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/search/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=26690.0&AUTHOR=Schoorl&beginIndex=22&listPageURL=GenusList2.dsml%3FAUTHOR%3DSchoorl&searchPageURL=BrowseAuthors.dsml%3FAUTHOR%3DSchoorl%26beginIndex%3D5. [137]
2. www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/search/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=28859.0&&. [108]
Go to these links and you will realize why.It is true the source added is on the site at number 36 and looks like: [36] Natural History Museum (nhm.ac.uk), 2011 .
Correct link to this source: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/ and nothing more.
Indeed an important question. there are difficulties and confusion with the addition of new taxa to the site if you want to rely on this source.Peter will have to somehow go through the source and remove all the excess out)))

18.04.2015 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cadphises maculata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.04.2015 9:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And call it perfection Cadphises maculata Moore, 1865 :)))
Now loans. The underside is a pity there is no (((

17.04.2015 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not mind the second gallery. Put-because there is no other picture there. "To the point" so to speak (((
Here to help arhivchik where the wind is blowing: http://rghost.ru/7jvQ89PkS (there are 4 of my photos with a brief explanation).
For a long time I place the monitor and there will not be any cabbage (((

17.04.2015 23:40, Peter Khramov:

Just this phot - for the second gallery, which we have long been agreed, but I have not done.

17.04.2015 19:15, Alexsandr Martukov:

Stanislav, thank you for the comments, and I sent you an e-mail in the rough, only to be converted to JPEG images that instance.
I myself am not special and has asked me to inform opinion-known researchers. They believe that this maturna.
Here, for example, reported that my photo Sergey Gordeev (Baikal)
"I think it E.maturna.White spots the bond underside of the wings are small, fractional, upper wings - contrast, for intermedia is unusual. The top of the wings - that the same pattern - and front and rear, contrasting with small spots. Dark Field medial rear wings contrasting with bright white spots. These are signs maturna. Intermedia, even fresh look "obliterated."We intermedia is found in a remote, real taiga, maturna - forest lover. According to the catalog of Lepidoptera Russia (2008) intermedia passes west of the Urals, I do not know how in fact ".

17.04.2015 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema tominia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema tominia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptosia nina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptosia nina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cepora nerissa / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cepora nerissa / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cepora nerissa / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cepora nerissa / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cepora timnatha / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cepora timnatha / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Update: Heterolocha sp. I guess. But what about species.
Somebody?

17.04.2015 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypochrosis hyadaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypochrosis hyadaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.04.2015 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I refer to this information helpful. Entomology in addition to photos of butterflies, and the correctness of the classification includes a lot of other things. Surveillance and monitoring for example.
We still have about ecology and conservation of habitats put in a word in the example)))
So Makar will soon have no one to shoot (God forbid) (((.And photos, but unsuccessful, but other from that point there already, alas, is not expected.

17.04.2015 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Site entomological, not historical. :) Photography is really unfortunate.

17.04.2015 7:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectephrina semilutata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2015 5:43, Alexander Belousov:

Basil, I pointed out that this is not accurately defined. I tried to straighten, can be further seen.

16.04.2015 18:25, Basil Sergienko:

In fact, on molbiol'e I certainly spoke about the kind of continue on the basis of the 7 famous in Ukraine, I said that it would be eremostola, the most similar. But as I neizvesno that it flies, it is not a fact. It is to start at least spread may then something clear.

16.04.2015 15:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where we Dumchus Alexander disappeared?

16.04.2015 15:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, again, a fresh question LK)
Do please edit menu selection on the number of photos: "Photography on the page" as in the public gallery.
With lots of photos it was very uncomfortable and we have a lot of flipping pages.For example: there are a lot of photos of butterflies where you have to write a "package" in the name of the geography of the same country. but these pictures are scattered on all the pages (in my case 85 pages) interspersed with photos of butterflies from other countries.
And there will be a "general plan" which is what is necessary to put in order to be immediately noticeable.

16.04.2015 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

16.04.2015 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

16.04.2015 12:50, Peter Khramov:

Dogs are rarely required, but it can sometimes be useful, so why not. It will be time to make a dog.
And about the fact that the author of this field is the king and god - it is not. Yes, in this field more assumptions, but when it comes infa which obviously applies to other fields or no other pages - it can then be edited.And not only the author (we the authors, is, for six months does not appear on the site).

16.04.2015 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I repeat no lyrics. This field has just pronounced the rules: "Any other additional information" that is, This is clearly spelled out in it, and yet again focuses attention on this.De jure, the information in this field is not the property of the site, as well as a picture that is located under the property of the author who posted this photo and have the right to comment on it without going beyond the general rules of the site (a site about butterflies).We can only, in this case ask the author there is something to fix or fit to something that does not correspond to the subject of other fields, and nothing more. And like it to someone in person or not is irrelevant.Generally offtopic went (out from the subject): she is devoted destination fields on the site and is devoted to the "dogs" to select the type and they are made on site for convenience and nothing more. So I asked Peter to do the dog, and in this field, so they can be applied in the right way.

16.04.2015 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, we have different concepts of bad taste. You refutes himself, if everyone would write that though (no matter where) is a mess, the author can not dictate (no matter where), that he was to write and what not to write. On the website it should be regulated. Since this is not spelled out, the last instance administrator.Generally any lyrics, and if it is a lot of the time, can turn any website into a kind of social network where all write what they want and no one or anyone or anything not specified. Here (on the site) a lot of the lyrics, and it comes from one particular moderator. :)))

16.04.2015 8:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pararge aegeria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.04.2015 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Mr. So he did was right. I stand.
Vladimir, all questions are removed)))

16.04.2015 8:01, Vladimir Deryabin:

No, the picture is not seized.

16.04.2015 8:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pararge aegeria it.

15.04.2015 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Color (general) okay .... Vladimir, had a similar pattern?
There are very similar on the rear underside of the wings from Portugal: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22310
There's definitely Roman Ishin and the definition of the man I suspected causes.

15.04.2015 22:10, Vladimir Deryabin:

The color of the top of the wings more like a painting Lycaena phlaeas, but darker.

15.04.2015 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dictate to the author, he wrote in his, Copyright (Understand personal) comments and what not to write, too, is not correct (it is bad form). The subjects of this field is devoted to butterflies: ie It is consistent with the main theme of the site. Do not equate with social networks are different things.

15.04.2015 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I visited a guess:
Apparently itPararge aegeriathis?

15.04.2015 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, there are rules in the social networks, in a particular niche sites, that's not good.

15.04.2015 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wikipedia does not hide: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Бильбао
Now define the left :)))

15.04.2015 19:51, Vladimir Deryabin:

And Ms. France this fact to hide from me. Lada, let it be Spain.

15.04.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, it is necessary to add the geography of Spain and the state :) The fact is that the so-called The Basque Country is located on the territory of two countries: Spain and France. Bilbao said for Spain.

15.04.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, it concerns the field of "Additional information / remarks.For example, instance,derived from the pupa or Determination was conducted on the picture or any other additional information: ", or simply " Comment author ")))
This field is free author fill or not, at its discretion:it is the author's original and edited without a time limit by the author himself and no one else but him can not do that.
And in this case one can not / does not have the right to put the author is no framework, except that the information must be specific photos or a butterfly species that is depicted in this photo.I think that the opportunity to provide a link to the form using "dog" must be there and did not see anything untoward. Sometimes you need in certain cases if the author himself wants to emphasize in this field focus on another form / forms for your convenience only.

15.04.2015 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Stand to the page of the form at the request of the team :))) But this is only my area so I leave comments and copyright :)

15.04.2015 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Compare related species, I think better in a box on the page type, it is called "Properties appearance and differences from similar species" and then species of the same genus are always right. :)

15.04.2015 16:44, Peter Khramov:

Plus Alexander. As for the comments - I speak, Zapara wild, I try to clean up the tasks of modeling the May.

15.04.2015 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

"Comments of the author" in this field must refer to a particular instance of that shown in the photo and the photo itself. In this case we are referring Comment successfully at the (whole text, except for size) and this information should be on the page, type in the "Commentaries." :)

15.04.2015 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fixed. Well, he wrote his opus in the author's comments, where with time correction is not critical))).
More than once I told Peter that claimed half an hour to edit comments yet upon .... At dead center (

15.04.2015 16:02, Irina Nikulina:

After the "author" the point is not to put down, in a hurry, I did not pay attention. Corrects late). In this case it is not so in principle, we about different. Correct still on Pieris napi Pieris rapae.

15.04.2015 15:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thanks for the comment, I agree that corrected.
Just want to recommend the correct word in the first bracketed part of the proposal upper case to lower. Here, "in the author's comments ( To avychki and capital" ..... between words author and the brackets is not the point (and a new offer Do not start with parentheses).So I take it as a part of the sentence, which in this case must begin with a lowercase letter.

15.04.2015 15:10, Irina Nikulina:

Pieris rapae - Pieris rapae, napi - green-veined white. It would be necessary to correct in the comment author (quotation marks and capital letters for Russian names also are not necessary)

15.04.2015 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, look at "dog" does not work if the comments written in the "Comment author" ?
Attend to please if you can: and there is need to link the type of lead. For example if you need to view photos compare with other closely related species.

14.04.2015 17:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pangrapta marmorata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2015 1:06, Irina Nikulina:

I think flyPangrapta marmoratahttp://catocala.narod.ru/noc_19.html

13.04.2015 23:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, just for reference. About how dangled in Izmailovo Park 2 years ago specifically for them (I do not know whether or not seen): http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526320&view=findpost&p=1403350
Then the females were foundAgriopis marginariaandLycia pomonaria
There is a picture of the process, and (they are not staged). Just repeat: the process is long and tedious: you can easily wandered all day and no females do not find, alas (((

13.04.2015 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Irina, without any problems, even access remains.
Demetrius, the boxes which that is, with no soca, but tomorrow will be a courier just before leaving. Zvyaknu tomorrow on this issue.
Basil, problems on the site and dofiga true, but time silёnkami here a couple of months but remains nifiga.

13.04.2015 22:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

birch, aspen is. maples oaks there. 5 males have all kinds of spring.

13.04.2015 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We linden, elm, oak, aspen, maple, etc .: to the main species were. But if there are males - by itself in the same place, there are females just hard to notice them: they are generally homely and well camouflaged.

13.04.2015 22:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

some trees, look at what height on which side? I clambered entire forest. male sea and samok- way. really caught Xylena vetusta

13.04.2015 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In Moscow, I would point you even told the faithful. In parks, on the trunks: a long and dreary wandering around, looking at each trunk (deciduous).

13.04.2015 22:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

we anchorite and cumin rare. the rest is banal. who knows where and how to look wingless female moths?

13.04.2015 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, yes, cumin, of course :)) It did not catch it even though there we see so forgotten. And the remaining four are flying everywhere in order, where there is food plants caterpillars. And in the marshes including on the very real DRL generator .... and notorious kurtula the swamps flies all packs))) Just legs grow out of this post: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php? showtopic = 235476 & view = findpost & p = 1537784 (link was removed why it). This is just for clarity repeated if the question arose :)

13.04.2015 21:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasiliy- 5 types Kloster (kurtula, Pigrov, anchorite, anastomozis) + pygaera timon
Peter = box is? If something is write =

13.04.2015 21:35, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, today, the day of memory of Vladimir, has been to publish all the photos I have. For the year put 291 photos, 118 species of ... a lot ... but if you know how and what he filmed - the drop in the sea of ​​course. So please leave me until the right of access in its LC in the hope that in due course will be found most valuable discs with photos, especially shooting night.There is something -what thoughts on where to look. And so ... glad that it has become such a page. Each photo - memory. Volodya - blessed memory.

13.04.2015 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do it, Peter. Uploading photos to reports, habitats, etc. It is now becoming important again like last year. Good ideas, but are not understand where (((
Sam would you crossed in Moscow to give it something else, but is now far from home do not crawl in mind certain circumstances. Then .... At the same time you'll order and pins (extremely relevant and №0 №1).But in the future.

13.04.2015 19:59, Peter Khramov:

The site has collected a lot of useful dodelok, including and loading on truck for reports and other blogs. But, apparently, I take for them could not before May.
The other day, I am going to the LV. Dim, if you're a butterfly from Vasily relevant, can capture. See you?

13.04.2015 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, what I'm saying)) However sealed: Clostera course .... I know in MO 4 species and all flying in the marshes "only way." Who is the fifth, then?
As for the acute: here you're right. Personal recipe from this - a hike in the woods. It helps a lot)))

13.04.2015 17:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil!!! all 5 species of flying at my dacha. to the marshes there is at least 2 km in a straight line

13.04.2015 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually finding the place (in the frame of the instrument is no excuse) :)))

P.S. As it turned out ... So far, drove home, she had already begun to spin a cocoon. So, the result is likely to be there)))

13.04.2015 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I posted his congratulation on the first page of your own photos butterfly this season. Who knew that it was at Easter it will be collected))) Of course we will continue to do in the relevant sections (not with regards to the butterflies).
Dmitry, fly all 4 types Pygaera, The given 8 to light in peat bogs Meshchera.For this I otveschayu))) Whatever they said. And so stressed out)))
Alexander, make acc to "Yandex pictures" https://fotki.yandex.ru (this for example). Next, I will explain if necessary.
Today, probably, as an example podtseplen picture to one goose found today.
Well, of course, a year ago we discussed the issue of placement of habitats and so on.is still in limbo: the disorder (((

13.04.2015 14:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I wanted to hang around Singapore otchetets)))

13.04.2015 14:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Through third-party site it is possible, but we would like to ship directly here.

13.04.2015 13:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

The ability to insert photos have for a long time, but then slyly, only as a reference to the hosted network. I can not. Perhaps there was a great need.

13.04.2015 12:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Some schizophrenia (Spring Fever). Someone kurtula the light does not fly, some Easter Nemtsov equals. The site remained 3 people !!! When the opportunity to insert a photo into text ???

13.04.2015 11:59, Peter Khramov:

Basil, about religion - or we will slide in and politics, and religion (together), or does not retract neither one nor the other. Generally, in the smoking room on the idea you can talk on any topic, so it would be good not to shoot, but the last time the policy was a reaction to this, it seems, will have to push.
Regarding the formalization - everything now can be assigned.If you put a Use Shift to select ranges, any number of disparate including values ​​can be selected Kontrylom.

13.04.2015 11:54, Peter Khramov:

Basil, in the continuation of the system area.

13.04.2015 10:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

13.04.2015 9:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, a technical question on the formalization of (business especially because my asking). Now technically impossible to formalize adult flight time "in one fell swoop," if the imago flies in two generations. For example: 1st generation March-May and 2nd July, August. It does not single out "line" for both generations.Just can not add Mar-May and July, August, bypassing June. Do something if possible.

13.04.2015 9:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antigius butleri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.04.2015 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.04.2015 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.04.2015 9:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atara arata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.04.2015 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

Antigius butleri

13.04.2015 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius cognatus

13.04.2015 0:06, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius cognatus

13.04.2015 0:05, Irina Nikulina:

Atara arata

10.04.2015 18:33, Alexander Belousov:

It's been a year. Some updates about the species? Or it will be John Doe forever? I see it on regular basis...

10.04.2015 7:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.04.2015 7:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra pyramidea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.04.2015 0:31, Irina Nikulina:

Glaucopsyche lycormas

10.04.2015 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, Basil, if you want understanding - phoned in Skype and get it.

09.04.2015 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.04.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.04.2015 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.04.2015 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.04.2015 19:25, Peter Khramov:

Make a separate field. But for the time being - in general note det. We put and remove other fields only if this field infa checked.

09.04.2015 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could be so. but then the name of the site will have to write a geography, not on it. This is the rules of registration of collections and they have established themselves over the years, tens (if not hundreds of years) in any book on the registration label collection is recommended to have in that order.Because the date, geography and surname collector constant and of itself can not be changed in any case.With the definition of another matter: it can change: changes accordingly label :)
It's just I've spent an analogy with the display on the site)))
In short, really walk in a circle, and the problem is not worth a damn: So, as a matter of fact it is not. Everything on the site is logical.

09.04.2015 16:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)))
Basil, a geographical label (where, when, who. Caught) and definitional label (the name and who is determined when it is desirable). given this, the author identification should be called. :)))
The sequence of labels, displays the time of occurrence of the original butterfly is caught and then determined.:) Here site and not a collector material.
We walk in a circle :)))

09.04.2015 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, for what do you mean already count "Additional information / remarks. For example, the instance output from the pupa or Determination was conducted by photo , or any other additional information" . The LKit is not called in any way, but it appears from the information in the "Comment author" if there is anything written. I think this is quite logical.
Pun: It is displayed just below the geographic data.Just like on the rules of registration of collections for the insect, the same first pin to pin the label and geographic already under her attributive (not vice versa in any case) :)))

09.04.2015 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

All's well that ends well. Aleksand promptly made information. But again, this is a special case.

09.04.2015 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter and Basil, accurate classification - a subspecies, all the rest is another refinement, but not classification, and in a private office that sounds true test. and humble "refinement" and to clarify that really need to register.And Peter, if you can not enter the column "Identified" and "Confirm" for people that are not in the list, then definitely I would definitely wrote in this column. "Clarification". Thought Belousov very correct :)))

09.04.2015 15:47, Alexander Belousov:

Try to score as Dmitry, I am taking all the fly.

09.04.2015 15:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, open the form loading ("Download site") at the top and click on the "Submit your picture of this kind of butterfly" on any page and you'll see how a screen. This is the notorious line-subtitle. The LK editing it is given in abbreviated form.I on the other hand insist on the fact that this line is necessary to write only what it implies.
If all start to write whatever they want to be a mess, which is then self-same rake. Not good (((
P.S. Now there is to do everything as it should: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32961

09.04.2015 15:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil. I do not see how a screen, but it is written is not true, there is 2/3 of the above values ​​is not relevant to the classification,
in a private office box called "Clarification" is only a subspecies and form, to the classification applies only subspecies.
I repeat once again that I believe that it is impossible to remove the compulsory copyright information, without transfer.Although this information is like someone from the moderators or not.

09.04.2015 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, so I asked for it in the comments of the author determined the register wherever decided to write the majority of authors refer. Comments on the 09.04.2015 11:51 :) did the right thing poudalyal everything that was written after the it. Now, the author accurately observed.

09.04.2015 15:21, Peter Khramov:

The appointment line Vasily rights, it is clarifying the classification. A sequence of human Alexander. First you need to infa was added to the other line, and then later removed from the original. Otherwise infa may get lost, but people can not understand.

09.04.2015 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I add (already repeatedly wrote that the statement is not an hour to edit):
With the form in which to write the name of the subspecies has long been decided and I remove your excess to LK .. So as periodic and other catch-up as there obnaruzhatsya bloopers. On the moderators and there is the ability to edit this line.

09.04.2015 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did not intentionally tract. At the moment, there is written this way:

And everything is clear in brackets explained that there should be written.
And I do not see any sense in your public claims and allegations of impropriety.

09.04.2015 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I repeat, you are voluntarily traktuesh values ​​count. in any case it was necessary to first move the data, and then delete it, this you just is not right. At the expense of what to write in this column, and what not to write, you have to discuss it. You made a long avtoran to write the species name, it is still not all opuses poubirali.

09.04.2015 13:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It depends on where the removed nekoreektno. Do moderators have the right to edit this line to it is written in line with its intended purpose (see. The latest comments by the top photo of the butterfly).

09.04.2015 12:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Remove the author definition is not correct.

09.04.2015 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

09.04.2015 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, please write in LC that I removed from the field "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age)." in the "Additional information / remarks. For example, the instance output from the pupa Determination was carried out by, or photos or any other additional information: ")))

09.04.2015 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.04.2015 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.04.2015 8:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander! You will be able to dial these for me?

08.04.2015 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A couple of words))
Something did not like it as much as the podmarennikovy a pair of attributes:
1) Feed the plant from this specimen. caterpillars willow: most of the literature indicated bedstraw and Cyprus, and the plant is completely out of "another story".
Found himself repeatedly and subsequently feed on the Cyprus and cleavers.Willow is full, but never in it have not been seen caterpillars.
2) Painting is not suitable.
The overall color of caterpillars Black + green or light (usually yellow) spots arranged differently and never expressed so clearly around the spiracles.
Horn caterpillar red (though it surely applies only to the final stage).
In general, it is very strongly pitched for podmarennikovogo.Many species of hawk moths excellent fliers, and characterized by the ability to migrate long distances (podmarennikovy among them). Maybe this is some kind of vagrants? Who knows? Because there could easily and fly someone from America, for example? There are very close ....As an example, a well-knownSphinx pinastrihas been collected in the past year, not somewhere near Moscow and in the archipelago of Fiji ... Although right in the spread adds :))
We had to collect caterpillar, bring up and get imago .....

08.04.2015 15:14, Alexander Belousov:

Flying in the UV, but probably after midnight, found them in the morning! The lamp burned all night (UV tube). It was the same last year.

08.04.2015 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Probably the only photo of this species in the network class. That would have to find where it is for 11 of the region from the blue.

08.04.2015 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

A new species of hawk, to the north, much more unlikely than with color variations caterpillars widely ubiquitous species, who was there found. Sam found his tracks in the Arctic Circle in Yakutia.

08.04.2015 10:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyles gallii / Confidently identified / Alexey Perelygin.

08.04.2015 7:01, Alex Dumchus:

Parantica cleona ?

07.04.2015 21:37, Irina Nikulina:

Maletoyvayam Olyutorskii River in the area - at all 32 area (though close to the border with the 34th) A 32 reg. any kind of cemeystva Sphingidae not specified. In the neighboring reg: 33- only Hyles gallii, Smerinthus caecus and Hemaris fuciformis, in the 34th (Kamchatka) - have written below.

07.04.2015 19:31, Alexey Perelygin:

Note the black tail with a black stripe at the end gusennitsy. In Hyles galii it is not so. Maybe it was some other kind? (On the Kamchatka Peninsula is found only Hyles galii, in Koryak - questionable?).

07.04.2015 17:50, Irina Nikulina:

In fact, some sites (including on tripod.com and funet.fi) among food plants for Hyles gallii stated Salix ssp (although the main Galium spp., And Epilobium spp.). And for Kamchatka indicated only 2 species of the whole family, with a second, Marumba gaschkewitschii, - a question ... But once the caterpillar, and the truth is not quite like the gallii ... What experts say hawk moths?)

07.04.2015 16:56, Alexey Perelygin: This species is identified correctly.

07.04.2015 16:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

T. aruna like

07.04.2015 16:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Just do not dirtea. The underside is needed

07.04.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.04.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.04.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Irina, for amendment and confirmation determination :) stand in exact.

07.04.2015 16:02, Irina Nikulina:

But not the third?)) But something is not enough ...)) With regard to the definition, the butterfly in the photo is fully consistent with the description of the Diagnosis on mothsofborneo.com

07.04.2015 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Began "jubilee", the second a photo with a thousand new species for the site :)
It's hard with them, so the set is in the inaccurate although almost certain that a copy is much less than the wingspan presented earlierStictoptera cucullioides, and indeed fundamentally different, and no one but she does not come to mind.
This female has here: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_1_4.php

07.04.2015 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Paramaxates sp.

07.04.2015 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On the eve of the season accumulated "tails" tropical reset to hope that determined ....
Apparently Xenoplia sp. ?

07.04.2015 6:58, Alexey Perelygin: This species is identified correctly.

07.04.2015 6:58, Alexey Perelygin: This species is identified correctly.

07.04.2015 2:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Colotois pennaria / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.04.2015 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://goo.gl/eVgve0

06.04.2015 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Perixera absconditaria?

06.04.2015 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hypochrosis hyadariathis? Or someone close.

05.04.2015 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nygmia guttulata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Euproctis plagiata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.04.2015 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Basil: true-your stand :)

05.04.2015 22:11, Basil Sergienko:

Why not Euproctis plagiata?
In general, "there is nothing like" the tropics -smeloe approval

05.04.2015 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As long as inaccurate, but like with the habit among them more and there is no one ....

05.04.2015 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Nygmia guttulata / Tentatively identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.04.2015 20:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

05.04.2015 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Interesting :)
A pair of rollers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efyufhtO7VU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUpnHUyUO_0

05.04.2015 19:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Psilogramma menephron also squeaks, no worse than the Acheron. murine and volatile enemy number one. many of them in the morning insect debris lying = tin. This year the two thundered.

05.04.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And representatives of this kind seems to squeak all: andAcherontia atroposincluded.
Somewhere heard or read about what they pishat a reason: so confusing bats to avoid being sozhranymi :) I do not know how true this is, but I wonder ...

05.04.2015 17:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I caught a beast this year, finally. The food in a net, like a chicken!

05.04.2015 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sideridis kitti / Alexandr Zhakov Sideridis reticulata / Sergei Kotov.

05.04.2015 8:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

05.04.2015 8:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

05.04.2015 8:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rheumaptera hastata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2015 22:53, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, I also saw that the species combined.

04.04.2015 20:35, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes sylvanusfemale

04.04.2015 20:08, Irina Nikulina:

MaleOchlodes sylvanus

04.04.2015 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prioneris philonome / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.04.2015 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Prioneris philonome :)
http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Malaysia%20-%20Prioneris%20philonome.htm

04.04.2015 19:24, Irina Nikulina:

I do not know why, then wrote about 5 species) Apparently, the Japanese looked at the same time, just in case) and 37 region (in the neighboring Primorje, too) only 2 species, and still seems to me the butterfly as hastata

04.04.2015 19:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria angarensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2015 19:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euphyia cineraria / Irina Nikulina Euphyia unangulata / Basil Sergienko.

04.04.2015 19:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphyia unangulata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2015 18:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctua tirrenica / Alexandr Zhakov Noctua fimbriata / Basil Sergienko.

04.04.2015 18:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctua tirrenica / Alexandr Zhakov Noctua fimbriata / Basil Sergienko.

04.04.2015 18:36, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Basil. And what about sunken I also doubt arose when looked in more detail, defining it, I forgot to write there.

04.04.2015 17:34, Basil Sergienko:

Esche again express great doubts about N.tirrenica, in my opinion it is usually lighter N.fimbriata

04.04.2015 17:01, Basil Sergienko:

I think -E.unangulata, but drowned E.cineraria seems too unangulata

04.04.2015 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here, too, I think Irina rights with determination. Painfully underside characteristic.
Truth is sought her again at the request of Clossiana angarensis)))
http://www.nature.chita.ru/Insects/Lepidoptera/Nymphal/clossiana_angarensis.htm
http://www.zooexcurs.narod.ru/butterfly/argynninae.htm

04.04.2015 15:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

I for 2013, too, worked through routes and fare, but somehow it was all over the Caucasus)

04.04.2015 15:40, Irina Nikulina:

I would like at least once to get to the Far East in June and July)) In all other months of the 12 was once ... except for these two)

04.04.2015 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, observed in nature for those living emeralds probably something special :)))

04.04.2015 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2015 15:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina filipjevi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2015 15:30, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius taxila
This photo was sent in the summer of 2009, Vladimir with little explanation - "Battle Stance :) male marshmallow surveys sovereign airspace, ready at any moment to fight.Marshmallows arrange these air battles, especially early in the morning - for the female, sunlit leaf or to drive away trespassers from its territory, involving him in the air duel. Sometimes several males gather in a single battle, and then the shimmering emerald - sapphire ball rolled over the tops of trees.Flyers are excellent, fly fast! And only the midday sun causes them to temper his zeal and hide in the shade of the trees ... After these fights, you can forget about the little tail) "Probably something like this happens) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPqy_Z95-tc&list=PLZRkuDAfH7LBzNRxdIyk4w9q2uRxU9s94&index = 60

04.04.2015 15:29, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina filipjevi

04.04.2015 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I honestly do not see any differences in these species, both species vary in color and figure, here it is necessary to know where to look. :)) I would like to hear the opinion Sergienko, Belyaeva or Gordeeva. :) Keep silent will endure in inaccurate Euphyia unangulata, Irina and given your opinion. :)

04.04.2015 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think Irina rights without options: itEuphyia unangulata
Euphyia cinerariahere: http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentiinae/Euphyia_cineraria.html
And she nama look unlike the butterfly, which is in the photo :)

04.04.2015 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, what doubt?

04.04.2015 13:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Hmmm ... and here all right? =)

04.04.2015 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Petr Khramov Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2015 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliothis adaucta / Confidently identified / Petr Khramov.

04.04.2015 10:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliothis adaucta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2015 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliothis adaucta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.04.2015 10:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia fraudatrix / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.04.2015 8:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polychrysia splendida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2015 8:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cirrhia tunicata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2015 8:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus pseudaegon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2015 8:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala electa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2015 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna conigera / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2015 8:51, Evgeny Komarov:

It!

01.04.2015 23:55, Irina Nikulina:

Cirrhia tunicata

01.04.2015 23:53, Irina Nikulina:

Plebejus pseudaegon

01.04.2015 23:52, Irina Nikulina:

Polychrysia splendida

01.04.2015 23:51, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala electa

01.04.2015 23:51, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna conigera

01.04.2015 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you )))

01.04.2015 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vassily, I join in the congratulations :)) You pass the year with jokes and rhymes. Look at this life with humor and it gets better. And many intreresnyh animals this year. :))

01.04.2015 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you )))

01.04.2015 13:57, Peter Khramov:

By the way, yes, Basil. Happy Birthday! I wish you success in the hunt for a new job and - so, so glad it was you!

01.04.2015 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I just took the joke seriously because the day I sertёzny April 1))))
Just not accustomed himself to joke that day)))

01.04.2015 13:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil! :)))
Mobiole On April Fool's joke. :)) About the subspecies. :)))
A subspecies of the original site one of the moderators of skidding.

01.04.2015 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, certainly (if not mistaken). It's about what they like ka abolished?
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=47665&view=findpost&p=1544227
More Early on the fly to pick up these innovations. Today, one thing and another tomorrow. It is necessary to wait.

01.04.2015 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Who we add subspecies?

31.03.2015 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

31.03.2015 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eugnorisma chaldaica / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov Eugnorisma ignoratum / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

31.03.2015 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eugnorisma chaldaica / Alexander Belousov Eugnorisma ignoratum / Basil Sergienko.

31.03.2015 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eugnorisma chaldaica / Alexander Belousov Eugnorisma ignoratum / Basil Sergienko.

31.03.2015 15:39, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you, Alexander, I also looked at these pictures, too, and saw that does not match. But I want to believe the expert. So - how to choose, as well. Maybe until -in inaccurate?

31.03.2015 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's definitely not Eugnorisma trigonica, the original definition of a more accurate, but it is probably a mistake, and as a variant offers V.Sergienko Eugnorisma ignoratum Varga & Ronkay, 1994

31.03.2015 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, I would not hurry, a single image Eugnorisma trigonica, he found, does not fit this picture.
http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t398963-100.html

31.03.2015 8:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euproctis chrysorrhoea / Svyatoslav Knyazev Euproctis similis / Basil Sergienko.

31.03.2015 5:11, Alexander Belousov:

Override S.Korbom asEugnorisma trigonica! I beg to move at all photo copies. in Group.

30.03.2015 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ancylolomia tentaculella / Vlad Proklov Ancylolomia palpella / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.03.2015 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Please remove this image from the illustration page type, it's a different kind. I will endure, just Svyatoslav silent, silence, acquiescence :)))

30.03.2015 19:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

fruit + sugar + yeast + beer
there is no light there

30.03.2015 18:16, Shamil Murtazin:

And what is put the bait on the bottom, "saucer"? Or a butterfly attracted to light? ..

30.03.2015 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yet to be corrected. :) And just I encountered an error.
Now I have a question in front of him, and the previous picture in 2014. I myself correctly identified? :))

30.03.2015 15:23, Andrey Ponomarev:

Oops, here Sasha already adjusted.))

30.03.2015 14:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This light traps. They work well, but the aircraft did not cram luggage.
http://www.insectcage.net/shop/buy-butterfly-traps-lightweight-expedition-humane.html I used these types. In the tropics, indispensable thing. Weighs a little, comes something that I could not see the forest. Who caught in the jungle will realize how much easier to check the traps and not worn (usually in vain) for the butterflies.

30.03.2015 12:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

This maleAncylolomia palpella, the male Ancylolomia tentaculella, antennae should be poskromnenee.

30.03.2015 7:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemaris affinis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.03.2015 7:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica adusta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.03.2015 7:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina filipjevi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.03.2015 7:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.03.2015 7:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrgus malvae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2015 23:01, Shamil Murtazin:

but such things are working?
http://www.barnwoodarboretumpark.yolasite.com/resources/Robinson_Light_Trap.jpg
http://www.barnwoodarboretumpark.yolasite.com/moths.php

29.03.2015 22:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Type in a search engine traps for butterflies. and manual work- in any negative things? do not confuse with kustarschina hendmeydom.

29.03.2015 21:48, Irina Nikulina:

Hemaris affinis

29.03.2015 21:48, Irina Nikulina:

Japonica adusta

29.03.2015 21:47, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina filipjevi

29.03.2015 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina ladonides

29.03.2015 21:45, Irina Nikulina:

Pyrgus malvae

29.03.2015 21:43, Peter Khramov:

Give an example of how to trap a thread to look. Well, yes, handmade in such things - at no plus and minus.

29.03.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25408 group.

29.03.2015 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25407 group.

29.03.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25412 group.

29.03.2015 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25411 group.

29.03.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25414 group.

29.03.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25418 group.

29.03.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #23916 group.

29.03.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25420 group.

29.03.2015 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25424 group.

29.03.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25427 group.

29.03.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25428 group.

29.03.2015 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.03.2015 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25431 group.

29.03.2015 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25499 group.

29.03.2015 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

29.03.2015 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

29.03.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

29.03.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

29.03.2015 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

29.03.2015 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25504 group.

29.03.2015 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.03.2015 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha tullia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2015 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sympistis heliophila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2015 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna pallens / Svyatoslav Knyazev Mythimna impura / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2015 17:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna pallens / Nikolay Grebennikov Mythimna deserticola / Basil Sergienko.

29.03.2015 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lyssa menoetius / Evgeny Komarov Lyssa zampa / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.03.2015 15:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ready to make a trap for the order with the specified diameter and length of the grid. Also sells muslin (sacks) for the nets to order (not Czech sticky shit of two parts, a normal triangular bag - he uses such for many years). All handmade)))

29.03.2015 14:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There are ready for the tropics 3 pieces on them and caught.

29.03.2015 14:06, Peter Khramov:

And what of the kroon? Pictures e?

29.03.2015 12:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

zampa, without options

29.03.2015 12:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not flew NOTHING. Not in Malaysia or Indonesia. The weight of the lamp is very large - in short a burden and garbage. Maybe we will have to work, but take it any more I will not. Incidentally exercises held 3:00 when I have two UV lamps (excluding fluorescent lamps). This time, actively fished traps kroon. A very wonderful thing !!! What a night that day. I recommend!!!

29.03.2015 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, all current year to fix please. July was not yet in 2015, but :)

29.03.2015 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea scotosia Melitaea ambigua.

29.03.2015 10:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Here I Oshibochka out! This copy is not scotosia, and Mellicta ambigua! Basil! Bring your!

29.03.2015 8:41, Alex Dumchus:

I have him in the Dominican Republic flew, even from the balcony, but there was a lot of night-living creatures, but Vietnam is not flew, and Tae, a couple of years ago, at a similar lamp did not fly ...

29.03.2015 7:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What a lantern something mean? If the one that I have: that flew at him given his power and other Har-ki at the end of last season, it is quite acceptable for the time at which I began to catch: it was in the middle of August, when the insects have nonsingular already and fly.

29.03.2015 2:24, Peter Khramov:

Odd enough, everything is flying clouds, and Tropicana Nitsche does not fly ...

28.03.2015 21:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Hmm ... type and I have to be in the region ... =)

28.03.2015 20:23, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkSympistis heliophila

28.03.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.03.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.03.2015 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris melete / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.03.2015 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris dulcinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.03.2015 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lopinga achine / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.03.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25990 group.

28.03.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25992 group.

28.03.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #26654 group.

28.03.2015 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #26652 group.

28.03.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.03.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #26657 group.

28.03.2015 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #26682 group.

28.03.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #26684 group.

28.03.2015 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #26686 group.

28.03.2015 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 17:53, Irina Nikulina:

I think maleCoenonympha tulliassp. mixturata Alpheraky, 1897- Kamchatka subspecies. Here look at this subspecies from Kamchatka and Alaska http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/coenonympha_tullia_mixturata_specimens.htm http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/coenonympha_tullia_mixturata_specimens.htm

28.03.2015 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.03.2015 14:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

it did not fly even in the absence of other light sources.

28.03.2015 14:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

lyssa zampa is likely, but certainly not menoetius

28.03.2015 14:34, Peter Khramov:

More let write. Well I wonder what is wrong.

28.03.2015 1:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25533 group.

28.03.2015 1:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.03.2015 1:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.03.2015 1:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #26689 group.

28.03.2015 1:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 1:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 1:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 1:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 1:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.03.2015 1:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.03.2015 1:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #26691 group.

28.03.2015 1:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.03.2015 1:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 1:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39553 group.

28.03.2015 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2015 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39554 group.

28.03.2015 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2015 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

27.03.2015 20:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

price and size. superlampu your ready to return. Tropical sucks. or change to 10 pcs Vietnam

27.03.2015 16:30, Yuri Semejkin:

"Small sabantui"

27.03.2015 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Superb. If the relevant box - call (after the 12 am tokmo).

26.03.2015 18:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I returned.

26.03.2015 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It would be nice to specify the date of catching and geography. Especially when a bunch of photos is not related to the group. And focus not on what (((. Therefore, to link them to groups stop until no clues in the form of a label data.

26.03.2015 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Female.

26.03.2015 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.03.2015 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.03.2015 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #24071 group.

26.03.2015 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.03.2015 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.03.2015 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.03.2015 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.03.2015 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suffered in uncertainty. If a species is defined only up to the kind of in the "Name of the species" is not necessary to write anything.

26.03.2015 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Capperia / Tentatively identified / Nika Agayeva Not identified.

26.03.2015 17:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Everything can be removed, it is a matter of chance. I see where the village, I come and I can not see. She sits next to, including with open wings. So did only 2 inferior image and the underside hardly saw her.

26.03.2015 15:49, Igor Sakhno:

So the top of it, and will not be removed, except that only at the time of marriage dancers.

26.03.2015 13:37, Peter Khramov:

We do.

26.03.2015 11:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Another lover of the March fly. Top White, remove failed. Looks like the only winter oklemalas, legs may not hold much, but it flies well.

26.03.2015 10:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Ieh light traps to ... :)

26.03.2015 0:32, Peter Khramov:

Exactly. And I do not see any reason to carry a generator or inverter, when it is possible to carry a second car. And indeed the need for the trip in question, when the house is convenient outlet. Basil, all very different life circumstances and preferences. Someone does not like to farm. Someone does not like the noise. Someone does not like the smell of kerosene.Someone has five children in the car. Someone not have a car.

25.03.2015 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But a home outlet and nobody speaks :) But in the field in the presence of auto preferable generator.
Inverter mentioned because I know a person who uses such a solution in the fields. Essno minus: the machine has to start from time to time to recharge the battery. Zhruschey this thing so it's best to carry a stand-alone generator.And the generator can be supplied as much as it allows (DRL 250 minimum). Sense to carry on car something okromya generator or inverter just do not see.

25.03.2015 21:13, Irina Nikulina:

Pieris dulcinea, the second generation

25.03.2015 21:12, Irina Nikulina:

Pieris melete, the second generation

25.03.2015 21:11, Irina Nikulina:

Lopinga achine

25.03.2015 21:10, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes sylvanus

25.03.2015 21:10, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes sylvanus

25.03.2015 20:50, Peter Khramov:

I believe that home socket 220 is much more reliable and less expensive than a generator. And inverters for cars nafig not needed. You may want to grab a second car and start the engine from it. In addition, a second car can simply be towed first, so if something goes serzenoe more than discharging.

25.03.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Half an hour of editing is still no (in practice approx. 20 minutes).

25.03.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if a generator is a self-will and 220. (Axiom)
Lithium then it is understandable why such a price. But not entirely reliable. Although with a load of 8 watts do not argue for a long time to work (depending on the quality of Akka).And here's a reminder that you can start the car a few unnecessary in my opinion (even if it is the coolest lithium may brainer to die from such operations, and with very fast) (((
Not for nothing in the automotive industry, including in the coolest Mercedes, Maybach, Bentley, Rolls Royce, Jaguar, etc.used if I am not mistaken only classic lead-acid acca known for its dependability in ektremalnyh conditions (to turn the starter should be a lot of amps at a voltage of 12 in.) :) Lead battery can withstand a category Pts. large currents. And if you have a car, there is no need to buy the system (its 12 in.enough to nourish this light bulb with a vengeance). And if you want you can grab the same generator or inverter))

25.03.2015 15:48, Peter Khramov:

Do not several nesurёzno: the decision "bezrybe" so to speak:)
No, well, if the hand is 220, without limitation, the kanesh can be much less money fit. Just being here is ...
In general, most of all interested in what kind of a battery used in your design
Lithium, itself.What else in such a small weight / size fit.

25.03.2015 14:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Another flight of which began in March. Winter.

25.03.2015 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And not a few nesurёzno: the decision "bezrybe" so to speak :)
Himself as you know started to use like this: (the weight of a backpack with all the equipment is less than 10 kg.).
But by far the generator + RTD will be productive in any setting. You can of course and XRD 250/400 etc.to take, but there is still the weight increase due to the restriction (electronic ballasts do not trust because of their unreliability in such facilities), but using XRD is a plus: it can be split, and Vietnam can not due to the nature of the structure.Weight will be significant in any case, but also catching capacity will not compare with portable solutions)))
I would personally put on the generator + RTD (XRD), and we, of Lyokha have plans to go with a complete set of my points in the Vladimir region.Looking forward)))
Generally most interested in what kind of a battery used in your design so both cars to run a 12 volt lead acc. at least 40 A / h if memory serves me correctly)))

25.03.2015 13:23, Peter Khramov:

Basil, "a small generator and Vietnam" in comparison with the lamp - at both Kamaz compared to passenger Mercedes. It seems the price is similar, and both can go. But the pros / cons of each option, to put it mildly, my.

25.03.2015 10:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Nothing wrong. It happens!

25.03.2015 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Carrying a standard, the car in which the set of UV lamp: This is understandable. Interested in Har-ki.the battery if it is with small dimensions is able to start the car (using a crank starter motor) :))
Generally the price: it's a song (((For the money to actually buy a small generator, and Vietnam (runs without throttle therefore carry more convenient).

25.03.2015 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, I made a mistake yesterday. Transfer along with the definitions of Irina's authorship forgot to change)))

25.03.2015 8:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.03.2015 6:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil-2 day hangs. Correct would be necessary. It should be your signature. Under the first two signed up, and here it? It's one individual and it is indicated. By itself, that this picture is taken separately does not give a definite form.
Determination of 3-shots make a profit. Refer to it will not, because so, no permission from it. And without that, I do not give references.

24.03.2015 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.03.2015 14:06, Peter Khramov:

There was a stand-alone modification lantern C1. It is expensive, but also contraption afigenskaya. http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1986.

24.03.2015 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma punctarium / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2015 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma punctarium / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2015 12:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma punctarium / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2015 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthocharis scolymus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2015 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-aureum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2015 12:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2015 12:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupido argiades / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2015 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2015 6:59, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Yes, this is it, you're right.

23.03.2015 21:24, Basil Sergienko:

And you compare. Images have both.

23.03.2015 20:35, Alex Dumchus:

How much compared with Papilio rumiko, found only 2 maaaalenky differences, and I think it depends on the particular instance

23.03.2015 19:00, Nikolay Grebennikov:

and why?

23.03.2015 17:48, Basil Sergienko:

Instead deserticola?

23.03.2015 15:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Spilosoma punctarium

23.03.2015 15:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Spilosoma punctarium

23.03.2015 15:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily rights. It Spilosoma punctarium

22.03.2015 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Anthocharis scolymus

22.03.2015 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

Polygonia c-aureum, f. pryeri Janson, 1877 (autumn)

22.03.2015 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

Polygonia c-album

22.03.2015 23:40, Irina Nikulina:

Cupido argiades

22.03.2015 23:39, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina ladonides

22.03.2015 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.03.2015 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.03.2015 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.03.2015 11:16, Andrey Lutikov:

I apologize for any foreign objects in the frame, but the coolest picture usually is not that good at the background. :-)

22.03.2015 10:05, Alexander Belousov:

Great!

21.03.2015 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

You have a good picture of the quality, now find decent facilities. Never will be equal to the worst, it greatly relaxes on a life :)))

21.03.2015 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais urticae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2015 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais urticae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2015 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Paratalanta hyalinalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Sitochroa verticalis / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2015 16:49, Irina Nikulina:

Aglais urticae(ssp. A. u. Eximia (Sheljuzhko, 1919) individuals of this subspecies is larger, are more red shade and the strong development of the black figure)

21.03.2015 16:48, Irina Nikulina:

Aglais urticae (ssp. A. u. eximia (Sheljuzhko, 1919)

21.03.2015 16:47, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes sylvanus

21.03.2015 16:47, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes sylvanus

21.03.2015 16:47, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina ladonides

21.03.2015 13:58, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I'm this and I was looking here zanimayus.Hotya photos others have worse than mine).

21.03.2015 13:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I decided to add another spring option. Since almost all represented by the July images.

21.03.2015 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Keep me two.
Indeed, a photo graphic illustration, for errors in the expanded butterflies. Nicholas of your photos, you can make a good atlas errors. :)))
The photos you're good at, if not raspravka, it would be very good.You do not probyvali pereraspravlyat their copies, many butterflies during storage leads, fall-rise wings. Their re-soak and the new straightened.

20.03.2015 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Yes, this is probably just right. Anxiety neighbors very little Buda.

20.03.2015 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

20.03.2015 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you. For male Tholera hilaris much. :)

20.03.2015 14:42, Nikolay Grebennikov:

38 mm wingspan.

20.03.2015 14:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spring is coming, spring road :)))

20.03.2015 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Antennae wind zdulo left :)
Nicholas, and do not specify the size, you still Tholera hilaris should be, it is much less decimalis.

20.03.2015 13:45, Alex Dumchus:

Peter, reserve me a couple standartnyh- convenient twist hotels on the balconies.

20.03.2015 10:37, Irina Nikulina:

Thank ure!) And congratulate you on the opening, this is almost like in 12g, even for a few days before)) successful season !!!

20.03.2015 8:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Finally! Season 2015 in Vladivostok and the surrounding area is open! Prior to that, basically just watched in flight.
So everyone on the come or occur, depending on the region of the season!

19.03.2015 19:15, Peter Khramov:

For motorists, truckers and homeworkers appeared here such lanterns: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1983. Foty is bad, try to make poluchche boom in the foreseeable future.
For fans of the standard cartridges E27 appeared here such bulbs: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1984.

18.03.2015 16:12, Alexander Belousov:

And I'm back to last season Zatar dolls, and now - every day out of tricks! So my season start his March 8 (Swallowtail). And on the street only seen hives.

17.03.2015 21:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Sadness. Good thing we still have snow ... more encouraged to continue the themes of attacks with a net and a camera ...)

17.03.2015 12:09, Yuri Semejkin:

All. began! Today, 3 large tortoiseshell saw one almost arrived. Remove unfortunately it failed, too somehow suddenly met. Snow still around.

17.03.2015 0:49, Irina Nikulina:

It Paratalanta sp. Determination to the kind of confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS). The exact definition of the type of image to impossible. In general, the same story as with the photo # 27753. Either inaccurate (Sasha took a chance) to any of three very similar - cultralis (ssp. Pc amurensis), taiwanensis and ussurialis.

17.03.2015 0:06, Irina Nikulina:

Omiodes tristrialisDetermination confirmed Ph.D. Kirpichnikova VA (Gornotaёzhnaya station them. Komarova FEB RAS)

16.03.2015 23:07, Irina Nikulina:

It is not Paratalanta hyalinalis, and no kind of Paratalanta. I think flySitochroa verticalis

16.03.2015 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew, they do not differ in color and the geometry of the external sling. In exanthemata arc almost parallel to the outer edge, and at pusaria straight. :) A copy of the same.

16.03.2015 10:29, Andrey Ponomarev:

And this would be corrected at Cabera pusaria, seem one and the same instance

14.03.2015 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris melete / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.03.2015 22:46, Irina Nikulina:

This spring generation, according to the shooting date, so I think that itPieris melete. In the first generation of Dulcinea more intense gray-greenish veins on the underside dusty and less pronounced orange speck, about how to photo # 34674

14.03.2015 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cyrestis thyonneus.

14.03.2015 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.03.2015 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis thyonneus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.03.2015 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis strigata / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

14.03.2015 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis strigata / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

14.03.2015 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Super properly when exposed to the site is already certain, I know photographers who take pictures of nature, their task is to photograph and identify others they sometimes provide for a number of reasons. But if one collects, the material in the collection should be determined. How this is achieved is a personal matter.:))) If in doubt, put an inaccurate definition. :))

14.03.2015 14:20, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you, Alexander. I'm also a little know- Rhopalocera tropics, at least much better than the Palearctic. But their updated try not to define or determine the last. So, in my opinion, correct ...

14.03.2015 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lamasia lyncides / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

14.03.2015 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lamasia lyncides / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

14.03.2015 14:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, what is meant by the "engaged ???" , if the transfer to the species, all of these rights, if someone collects from the moderators, then yes, Dmitry and Vasily, if you are interested in the site, much greater.:)) I try to carry as sure as the tropics I have to start with a zero phase, the species name is suitable or not ?, how many species in the genus, if any of them similar than different. For a long time at all, it is easier to wait until Dmitry Basil or outsource, they know a little tropics. :))

14.03.2015 10:56, Alex Dumchus:

And we except Dmitry and Vasily sometimes, someone engaged in the tropics ???

14.03.2015 7:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Very close! Today, the flies took off, the view from under the bark fly on the snow and sit on a tree trunk. So that is about to appear and butterflies

13.03.2015 23:43, Konstantin Lyutov: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2015 23:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good going. We have to do if you can.
For example, my soap dish takes on a maximum JPEG 2288x1712 and squeezed constantly have to ...

12.03.2015 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes it is not a new infa absolutely: Paul just some nonsense breccia ((
Example offhand: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/36876
Pos. Poplar is a former village torforazrabotchikov located in Meshchora there once already on the outskirts of the marshes (peat bogs) are :)
And a lot of more such examples can certainly ..... and molbiol write, but later.Now no time: Windu just rearranged to a new, faster hard equip .... :)

12.03.2015 22:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Several empty correspondence, more appropriate to the type on the page.

12.03.2015 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is a true definition, but a number greater than 37216 :)))

12.03.2015 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cabera pusaria / Andrei Komrakov Cabera exanthemata / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.03.2015 17:44, Peter Khramov:

Ie this is absolutely not the fact that, well, we're citizens pozatykali mouths and all things ... And Paul, I think, will be pleased about a new infe.

12.03.2015 17:43, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I cut your post because he was the last in the system area and calluses my eyes, because It took half a page in a tape of comments. At the same time with the publication passed, and I ostalvil semantic framework. In principle, you can just download the small comments to me as the last, and that's all ... The next time I will.

12.03.2015 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Now larger foty squeezed to these dimensions. Who believes it is time for us to increase the size of these same and, for example, if one ship Full HD images, allow to view it at that size? Ie increase the size of up to 1920x1080 or something similar?

12.03.2015 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Photo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/37212 the same, but it uses a different kind. Those in the know - write that remove what is left (that is true it is determined that there is).

12.03.2015 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolycaena rhymnus / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

12.03.2015 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neolycaena rhymnus / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

12.03.2015 13:52, Alex Dumchus:

Lamasia lyncides

12.03.2015 13:48, Alex Dumchus:

Ideopsis vitrea?

12.03.2015 13:47, Alex Dumchus:

Pareronia tritaea?

12.03.2015 13:45, Alex Dumchus:

Cyrestis strigata

12.03.2015 13:39, Alex Dumchus:

Like it, the second I still darker and Cyrestis heracles lighter and brighter will

12.03.2015 12:35, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Neolycaena rhymnus.

11.03.2015 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

11.03.2015 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm not nervous, Alexander. Just was a quote from Morozov molbiol that kurtula does not fly in the swamps, and where this quote is gone, so it is not clear can become what I was denied a))). In fact, just did not like this (((.
In fact, in MO all 4 local species Clostera: pigra, anastomosis, anachoreta and curtula flying everywhere including in the marshes.So as the last three catching in the city railway, on the balcony of my home and curtula are the most frequent guest.
They even kormovuha same:
Clostera pigra: Willow, Poplar, Aspen
Clostera anastomosis: Willow, Poplar, Aspen
Clostera anachoreta: willow, poplar, aspen, alder
Clostera curtula: Willow, Poplar, Aspen
The most that neither is a wading kormovuha)

11.03.2015 16:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I probably missed the start of the debate. In any case, do not be so nervous :))
In my area there is only one kind of Clostera, it curtula, and flies it to light in almost all habitats, so that would not massively, but usually.

11.03.2015 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill. For me it is an axiom that flies Clostera curtula to light, swamps only way to go. And I'll take my Morozov Shintelmeysterom Meshchora to catch her, to be sure. Please be careful to come near the cutting positions.To quote myself:
" Do not this to accept the attention as the assertion that the imago Clostera curtula not fly to light in selected habitats is not true."
What now do not take into account the fact, after cutting ????

11.03.2015 8:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, that already and I can not quote? Even in the system area?
Or "crimson pants" in the strength of this that warn of a possible blind following is not entitled to?
Not an idle question. I do not like this approach much.

10.03.2015 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is still a guess forCyrestis thyonneus: http://www.samuibutterflies.com/expeditions/nymphalinae/cyrestisthyonneus/

10.03.2015 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Exclusively "to the point" :)

10.03.2015 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not take this to the attention of as the assertion that the imago Clostera curtula not fly to light in selected habitats is not true.
Fly it to the light and the XRD and massively in peat bogs in Orekhovo-Zuyevo district, Moscow region. Sam gathered there last season several copies."to the point" :) Home really did not put (put necessarily in the confirmation). The butterfly is very common in MO everywhere where it grows Willow (the most that neither is on the marsh and coastal vegetation))))
Sorry, but it just shocked me the statement of Paul (((

10.03.2015 2:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Pieris dulcinea ?

09.03.2015 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The right question, Alexander)))
Here is my view justZygaena osterodensisis))
In the area of ​​Kovrov, Vladimir region. This species is very easily could be.
By the way: there, in the "Red Lighthouse" is closest to Moscow and stable populationParnassius apollo.Place of worship, if people went there to shoot, so he went to shoot Apollo :)
I myself to those places is not reached, but there are plans to carry out in this season ...
With this butterfly must still wait for reviews to be sure.

09.03.2015 22:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

?????

09.03.2015 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena minos / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2015 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I will do :)

09.03.2015 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The label is not at all?

09.03.2015 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2015 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2015 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2015 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2015 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35869 group.

09.03.2015 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.03.2015 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, a family, I try not to touch, butterflies, beetles :))), besides there is the curator if knew would certainly suffered. If I endure sure if wrong, curator recovered. :))

09.03.2015 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias albina / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2015 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias albina / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.03.2015 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's interesting:
This is a clearZygaena minos(he collected her series last season) and two other possible variants in 17 regions with similar coloration:Zygaena osterodensisandZygaena purpuraliscertainly does not pull.
We are waiting for "the sea weather" (curator) or still tolerated?

09.03.2015 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thymelicus lineola / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

09.03.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thymelicus lineola / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

09.03.2015 18:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, who had nothing, that does not eject :)) Peter, sometimes removes absolutely dead photos, and after persistent requests from all sides, and only if he agrees. :)). Andrei on a lot of photos, all the stages of a butterfly from egg to butterfly.if several photos one stage something different angles (right, left, top) is all you need to determine. if a lot of the tracks, the different stages are usually no empty photo :)) He is a master of very high class :))

09.03.2015 18:23, Alex Dumchus:

Throws to hell, you do not need, or tell me - I'll take. I just looked up how many photons give Andrey Ponomarev of a single individual and splagiatil.

09.03.2015 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pieris brassicae / Yuri Semejkin Pieris dulcinea / Alexander Belousov.

09.03.2015 17:57, Irina Nikulina:

Also think that the second generation of Dulcinea

09.03.2015 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, thank you for the information, all the arrows on Peter, and to carry it :)))

09.03.2015 17:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

And it needed a photo of all these processes rasspravki wings, in such quantities?

09.03.2015 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not remember :)), but this site is not suitable for determining .boldsystems.org., Will dig deeper. :)))

09.03.2015 17:47, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, a small clarification on the safe side, so that people know - I can only be illustrated by the photo page of the form, which are available as well, for example, clear the page, if the photo illustrates a redefined, I can not. I can replace them if there are others in this form, but if not available, will hang until Peter did not will remove them.If the accumulated non-illustrated species do later in the week on a stable Internet, is almost out of network)

09.03.2015 16:26, Alex Dumchus:

Understood, I forgot, Basil.

09.03.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uff ..
Alexander, 2 days for the second group of hefty for you knit. And moreover, of the new photo.
Moderator is not obliged to communicate the group on a regular basis instead of users immediately when new pictures in the gallery. I'm just something I correct mistakes in this area ....
Please try to connect in the group are put on the new self.

09.03.2015 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39341 group.

09.03.2015 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39342 group.

09.03.2015 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39343 group.

09.03.2015 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39344 group.

09.03.2015 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39345 group.

09.03.2015 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39346 group.

09.03.2015 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39347 group.

09.03.2015 16:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39348 group.

09.03.2015 15:35, Alex Dumchus:

A.Zhakovu: Well then Peter will be hollow. Peter, and Peter, transfer us some sailboats subgenus Chilasa!

09.03.2015 15:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It would be seen belly could be more precise. In this representation my error may be in any of the two species. Oh, to be honest I do not remember where and how it defined.
Hapigia annulata: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=286568
Hapigia nodicornis: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=21087

09.03.2015 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hapigia nodicornisone to one where the error?

09.03.2015 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander Dumchusu. Alexander reply to comment Actias isabellae .
Omit: And by the way, you are also allowed to moderation. :)))
The maintenance of the site is now involved 9 people (listed above :)))) Who is more, some less, who started, who are going. :))
1.Transfer the image from the page to the page of one kind of another species (species affiliation photo if overridden, can only two people: Irina Nikulin and Peter Temples.
2. Move views subgenus can curator and administrator of the family (which it will not do :))). Stanislav Korb - curator Rhopalocera Palearctic.If this is not Palaearctic then I think no one (except Peter :))))

09.03.2015 10:27, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander, but it is because we Basil joke. I know that butterflies, like beetles and others ... are endopterygota ... in the end and we can say about mummies :)))
With regard to Isabel, I was getting pupae from Belarus, and then the track is lost in the remote corners of Europe ...And by the way, you also admitted to moderation - see my last post and transfer of multsiber in ideopsis. It is not good zhe..vse same site beyond the cordon.
And, driving sailboats subgenus subgenus chilasa ..

09.03.2015 9:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, you're wrong, I've seen in the collections only exuvium - tarantulas, they are easier to spread than the entire spider. Butterflies and beetles they simply do not. Poumnichat "exuvia - skin is entirely discharged during molting."I understand that you were grown in caterpillar Novocherkask, but in this case indicate where the material is received, if it is in culture, taking place does not matter, and indicate that a copy displayed in the culture.

09.03.2015 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In group two different species were related: in the photo # 30610 E. mulciber clear and because of this all cheese boron (((
This gaffe corrected :)

09.03.2015 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

09.03.2015 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

09.03.2015 9:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euploea mulciber / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov Ideopsis similis / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus.

09.03.2015 8:20, Alex Dumchus:

I repeat: this is not multsiber is Ideopsis similis. Peter Basil transfer at least inaccurate.

08.03.2015 18:15, Alex Dumchus:

Well, Basil, and it ezuviyami imago we filled all the boxes;)))

08.03.2015 18:09, Alex Dumchus:

It is not multsiber is Ideopsis similis

08.03.2015 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yet this so-called exuvium pupae and adults of exuvium not :))

08.03.2015 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Pupa.

08.03.2015 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39320 group.

08.03.2015 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39321 group.

08.03.2015 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39322 group.

08.03.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39323 group.

08.03.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39324 group.

08.03.2015 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39325 group.

08.03.2015 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39326 group.

08.03.2015 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39327 group.

08.03.2015 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39328 group.

08.03.2015 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39329 group.

08.03.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39330 group.

08.03.2015 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39331 group.

08.03.2015 17:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39332 group.

08.03.2015 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.03.2015 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.03.2015 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander. Almost figured out thanks to your post ....
Strange phenomenon: Ad Muncher (cutting program for banners) why it began to take the search field of your resource and thus became his cut ... I had to disable the filtering for that site. Such changes are not good.
It is still pokumekat: because this did not exist before.

08.03.2015 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, do you have a glitch in the computer, I have everything and search for work.

08.03.2015 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Search does not work on the site. Ie where there are no fields to drive desired.

07.03.2015 18:04, Alexander Belousov:

It stillPieris dulcinea

07.03.2015 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

No questions?

07.03.2015 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea sylvestraria / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

07.03.2015 14:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes Idaea sylvestraria in 37 regions there. And the internet is like http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?bf=1701

07.03.2015 13:55, Basil Sergienko:

No, I wrote on sylvestraria (by the way, there seems to have) and not biselata (usual for us)

07.03.2015 12:58, Yuri Semejkin:

There Idaea biselata

07.03.2015 12:26, Basil Sergienko:

It is not Scopula, and Idaea similar to sylvestraria or whatever you like is,

07.03.2015 11:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Season close! .. Already gone bald spots! =)

06.03.2015 13:56, Nikolay Grebennikov:

This minos.

06.03.2015 11:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula immutata (Linnaeus, 1758) ?

06.03.2015 6:02, Alexander Belousov:

Thank Jura, took into account! I ran correct! :-)

06.03.2015 3:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! Do not distort Shamora. See even in the internet. There Shamorskogo pass in the suburbs of Vladivostok.
Shamorovsky correctly will pass. Go to the LC and correct everywhere.

04.03.2015 21:14, Nikolay Grebennikov:

where he was caught?

04.03.2015 18:03, Nikolay Grebennikov:

-poymenny meadow habitat.

04.03.2015 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

04.03.2015 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

04.03.2015 11:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ctenognophos grandinaria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.03.2015 5:47, Alexander Belousov:

Argynnis adippe

03.03.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

03.03.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

03.03.2015 17:12, Alexander Belousov:

Issoria lathonia

03.03.2015 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.03.2015 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

03.03.2015 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

03.03.2015 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is. No options.

03.03.2015 15:15, Alexander Belousov:

Argynnis paphia♂'s just unreal color from a photo of some sort.

02.03.2015 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where there kormovuhi thickets. Caterpillar develops on yasnotkovyh (see. Description). My couple (there is a photo) was taken at random over the thickets vlёt Shandra: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Шандра_обыкновенная (growing almost everywhere). The main thing is just to find the point.

02.03.2015 21:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Please indicate in which habitats to find it (but you can even attach pictures =). It may also be able to find.

02.03.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eilema lurideola Eilema complana.

02.03.2015 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eilema lurideola / Basil Sergienko Eilema complana / Aleksandr Andrianov.

02.03.2015 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, then I return back :)

02.03.2015 21:43, Basil Sergienko:

Yes, Sasha, then you're right

02.03.2015 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #10319 group.

02.03.2015 19:21, Aleksandr Andrianov:

It can not be lurideola. In my opinion, it does not even look like her. And yet, look at its underside, because I knowingly took this photo. There is clearly visible on the costal margin front wing section with raised scales. The male lurideola such is not present. So it is - a real complana!

02.03.2015 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not know how in the Southern Urals, but we (Region 8) both types Carcharodus, which are given to the region is quite difficult to find ... Can you and easier with them))

02.03.2015 16:59, Nikolay Grebennikov:

summer catch another substitute)

02.03.2015 16:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is a pity that emerged victorious, luchsheb completely lost :))
It is sad to watch this. :(

02.03.2015 15:02, Nikolay Grebennikov:

He was attacked in the collection but emerged victorious)

02.03.2015 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is, it is :)
But what Holdings "killed" is? (((

02.03.2015 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carcharodus floccifera / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

02.03.2015 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carcharodus floccifera / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

02.03.2015 8:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Empted by Pavel Morozov (molbiol.ru)

02.03.2015 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Furcula furcula / Evgeny Komarov Furcula bifida / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.03.2015 20:58, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Carcharodus flocciferus?

01.03.2015 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eilema complana / Petr Khramov Eilema depressa / Basil Sergienko.

01.03.2015 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think, too, that this is luridiola (even depressa). While they can not stand: it is interesting to hear more opinions.

01.03.2015 16:08, Basil Sergienko:

depressa

01.03.2015 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25602 group.

01.03.2015 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eilema complana Eilema lurideola.

01.03.2015 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eilema complana / Aleksandr Andrianov Eilema lurideola / Basil Sergienko.

01.03.2015 15:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree with Vasily: E. complana primarily folds its wings differently. Here in this picture is well shown: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6637
At least I have not seen much komplanu she sat that way :)
What do people still say?

01.03.2015 15:47, Basil Sergienko:

This is also not complana, depressa or lurideola

01.03.2015 15:43, Basil Sergienko:

It's kind of like-depressa

01.03.2015 15:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I apologize for that then got into a discussion (probably should not have to do it))))
I put point.

01.03.2015 15:39, Basil Sergienko:

It-lurideola

01.03.2015 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

01.03.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not get to it. Maybe it's the fact that polzuju Sinev in the original and are not guided by a site's directory. I repeat: so just convenient for me personally :)
And for the future: Boom know)))

01.03.2015 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euxoa tritici / Oleg Seliverstov Euxoa nigrofusca / Niyaz Ismagilov.

01.03.2015 13:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Euxoa, can be transferred from one species to another for a long time, but I believe that certain Matov should be trusted, if there is no firm confidence in malfunctioning. I mean why their views have not :))

01.03.2015 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the site in question decoding regions in order. In the catalog to the right, where "Options selection" launched " Region (Russia) " at the bottom of Notes to the regions of Russia all areas and other adminedinitsy given :) ))
All supervisors must know. :))

01.03.2015 8:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I used to use the original moderator list, not the directory of the site (which, by the way, too, have that kind is given to the Southern Urals, and to take it out of the same Sinev).I do not know why it did not see the authors write utvezhdenie type "minos to the South Urals is not given" :)
I was just easier to put on file sharing and provide a direct link, rather than to give a link to the inquiry in Yandex, which finds complete answers "Download Catalog Lepidoptera Russia" :)
By the way: in the catalog on the website are not given the decryption orderwhich areas are included in these specific regions. This is another disorder

01.03.2015 0:45, Peter Khramov:

Let's use a different source, you see, the truth and where the thread is drawn near. In addition, I do not propose here to spread links to scans of books, author / property rights for which are still in operation. Well, I recall the fifth time that the selection of the regions Sineva works in the "catalog".Three times out of five, I reminded about it to anyone, and the moderators. Tellingly ...

28.02.2015 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nicholas, from these data? The site decided to use the "Catalogue of Lepidoptera of Russia" Sinev which clearly indicated that the form Zygaena (Mesembrynus) minos (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) is in the region №17 (South-Ural) which includes: Rep . Bashkortostan, Orenburg, Chelyabinsk and Kurgan regions :)))

28.02.2015 20:06, Nikolay Grebennikov:

minos to the South Urals is not given

28.02.2015 19:40, Nikolay Grebennikov:

ATP) yes it is

28.02.2015 16:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.02.2015 16:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.02.2015 16:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

28.02.2015 10:42, Basil Sergienko:

Well, not male

28.02.2015 10:35, Basil Sergienko:

It's still reticulata, in my opinion.

27.02.2015 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

27.02.2015 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

27.02.2015 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

27.02.2015 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

27.02.2015 2:50, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, what do you say?

27.02.2015 2:47, Peter Khramov:

Dim Pozhogin, you left too Stoll? By your side clearly.

26.02.2015 20:21, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, there's probably no way your local experts (From your 18 species (and in some East Cams and more) images of 4 -5 years of age, at least, is unlikely to get found online, and a few are very similar on staudingerella, for example, bellela, karafutonis, lapikella ...

26.02.2015 19:43, Alexander Belousov:

Yes, I agree, it is not necessary to exclude. And about colors- here Ballance is not correct, most likely under the incandescent lamp is removed. Nikolai all pictures with a hard light, many nuances of color and shades have disappeared. Maybe somebody else will speak about? For me - as an amateur - a priceless experience.

26.02.2015 15:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is usually 4-5 and 3, but it is not quite so. :))
Only the exterior of drugs + gene. can more confidently say species. Especially in this instance, you have a typical Alexander more gray-brown and greenish gray, and brown here? And copies. not hurt shredded.

26.02.2015 11:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Nemophora staudingerella (Christopg, 1881) ?

26.02.2015 11:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Nemophora staudingerella (Christopg, 1881) ?

26.02.2015 5:40, Alexander Belousov:

Doubts - it's good. In Muschampia cribrellum good sign at the top of the PC - four (or more) white stroke. In Muschampia tessellum - three.

25.02.2015 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.02.2015 22:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.02.2015 22:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Arethusana arethusa / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

25.02.2015 22:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arethusana arethusa / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

25.02.2015 22:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Some of the photos, I want to keep longer uncertain :(

25.02.2015 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Instead Muschampia cribrellum? Just I'm doing doubts. :)

25.02.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

I've been looking at this tie, there is no other Muschampia? Well, I've seen a lot of tessellum, but I would have this kind would not have thought. :))

25.02.2015 19:30, Alexander Belousov:

It Arethusa, but faded badly.
http://www.jardinsauvage.fr/FAUNE/INSECTES/PAPILLONS/SATYRINAE2/Arethusana_arethusa.html

25.02.2015 19:15, Alexander Belousov:

Thymelicus lineola

25.02.2015 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Muschampia tessellum / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

25.02.2015 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Muschampia tessellum / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

25.02.2015 17:08, Alexander Belousov:

Muschampia tessellum

25.02.2015 8:40, Nikolay Grebennikov:

ATP)

25.02.2015 8:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena cynarae / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

25.02.2015 8:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.02.2015 8:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica lutea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.02.2015 8:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica adusta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.02.2015 8:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Petr Khramov Irina Nikulina.

25.02.2015 8:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Petr Khramov.

25.02.2015 8:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.02.2015 0:54, Irina Nikulina:

Japonica lutea

25.02.2015 0:53, Irina Nikulina:

Japonica adusta

25.02.2015 0:52, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

25.02.2015 0:52, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

25.02.2015 0:09, Konstantin A. Efetov:

This is Zygaena (Mesembrynus) cynarae (Esper, 1789)

23.02.2015 18:22, Nikolay Grebennikov:

ATP)

23.02.2015 17:56, Alexander Belousov:

Arethusana arethusa

23.02.2015 10:08, Alex Dumchus:

Daphnis placida ???

22.02.2015 21:46, Peter Khramov:

:--))

22.02.2015 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nicholas, you have to catch a wave, you've become everything to go well, and photographing straightened copies. and cropping, straightening left behind, do not rush, because then one would have to ask Peter to replace other photo, it is better to do well. :)))

22.02.2015 20:06, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I'm just doing rasparivaniem other specimens with drooping kryalyami and straighten the new.

22.02.2015 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chazara persephone / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

22.02.2015 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chazara persephone / Confidently identified / Male / Alexander Belousov.

22.02.2015 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Third only wanted, but there was no time :)

22.02.2015 19:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Picture quality is very good, cropping, too, but raspravka very best wishes;) All four wings are omitted.

22.02.2015 19:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chazara briseis / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

22.02.2015 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Chazara briseis / Confidently identified / Female / Alexander Belousov.

22.02.2015 17:21, Nikolay Grebennikov:

ATP for subspecies)

22.02.2015 17:21, Nikolay Grebennikov:

ATP)

22.02.2015 17:20, Nikolay Grebennikov:

ATP)

22.02.2015 16:34, Alexander Belousov:

Chazara persephone

22.02.2015 16:33, Alexander Belousov:

Chazara briseis ssp. meridionalis (Staudinger, 1886) ♀

22.02.2015 16:33, Alexander Belousov:

ssp. meridionalis (Staudinger, 1886) ♂

22.02.2015 15:09, Peter Khramov:

Approximately half of the day to the site do not ship new comments. Now isravlena glitch, everything is working normally. Alexander & Alexander, thank you reported the problem to the post office.

21.02.2015 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chazara briseis / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

20.02.2015 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyura narcaeus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.02.2015 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyura narcaeus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.02.2015 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.02.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.02.2015 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum mitchelli / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2015 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum mitchelli / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2015 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"I recognize my brother Kolya" :)

20.02.2015 15:17, Alex Dumchus:

Finish writing

20.02.2015 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, a subspecies: ssp. leucoglene (C. & R. Felder, 1865) at it this :)
Here it is just off Sulawesi: http://www.neutron.phys.ethz.ch/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae-Danainae.htm
Fill please subspecies in his LK :)

20.02.2015 14:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus genutia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2015 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus genutia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2015 14:00, Alex Dumchus:

Danaus affinis ??

20.02.2015 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Done.

20.02.2015 13:52, Alex Dumchus:

Polyura narcaeus ??

20.02.2015 9:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

The quality of picture and butterflies to be desired :(

20.02.2015 9:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia aethiops / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

20.02.2015 9:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia aethiops / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

20.02.2015 9:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Copy of http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31220

20.02.2015 9:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Not doglyadel. Copy. I offer this option to remove the underside (replaced by http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/39099.,-Он I like.

20.02.2015 6:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2015 6:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2015 6:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2015 6:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2015 23:39, Peter Khramov:

In the first post two spaces between the genus and species instead of one. Edit soon recovered.

19.02.2015 23:37, Peter Khramov:

Yes, updated on the server and the time put the German instead of Moscow. Today, corrected back to Moscow and will all the rules and with the editing, and online.

19.02.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tiracola aureata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2015 20:26, Irina Nikulina:

Tiracola aureata

19.02.2015 20:01, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Same as # 30345?

19.02.2015 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pertti Pakkanen "Vutterflies and Moths in Finland": http://www.dlc.fi/~peterpa/lepi/perhonen.htm
Although the Finnish language, but you can understand.

19.02.2015 19:11, Irina Nikulina:

I thought only I) now had to rewrite three titles. to make it easier to transfer there. With double the dogs are not spelled correctly. and failed to edit. The last time, too, does not prescribe, edited 2 times

19.02.2015 19:08, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus(had to rewrite the first time, too, with dual dogs wrote, did not understand why not stand out, and f-tion editing of comments for some reason I have now missing)

19.02.2015 19:05, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

19.02.2015 19:04, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

19.02.2015 19:02, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius cognatus

19.02.2015 19:01, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

19.02.2015 19:01, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

19.02.2015 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

19.02.2015 15:25, Nikolay Grebennikov:

ATP is well forward

19.02.2015 15:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

I lost the ability to edit their own posts.

19.02.2015 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

You read the discus. Confident there is no answer. We look forward to when the photo look Efetov - curator of the family on the site, but it still are not registered. When he looks. and then issue a verdict.

19.02.2015 14:39, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Zygaena cynarae so still?

19.02.2015 13:47, Alex Dumchus:

Well, good - then only white

19.02.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, I feel bad, photo box with porfyumov. But this is my opinion, someone may like it. Best of neutral colors, gray, white, black can green byry but bright.

19.02.2015 13:24, Alex Dumchus:

Enispe euthymius ???

19.02.2015 13:14, Alex Dumchus:

Enispe...

19.02.2015 13:11, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander is an assessment? .... or if bad, I will shoot on white.

19.02.2015 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Experimenting with pink -5

19.02.2015 4:03, Alexander Belousov:

In Erebia melancholica, Haute bands on the wing lighter and wider. In the photo - a male, and is clearly visible androkony, the male Erebia melancholica not see it. And living in the Caucasus. I think so.

18.02.2015 20:17, Nikolay Grebennikov:

and why? Simply Sineva not?

18.02.2015 18:50, Alex Dumchus:

Euthalia aconthea ???

18.02.2015 18:40, Alex Dumchus:

Pareronia hippia ???

18.02.2015 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

Ideopsis similis ???

18.02.2015 18:36, Alex Dumchus:

Eurema hecabe ???

18.02.2015 18:35, Alex Dumchus:

Neptis clina ???

18.02.2015 18:34, Alex Dumchus:

Cyrestis cocles ???

18.02.2015 18:30, Alex Dumchus:

Amesia aliris ???

18.02.2015 18:25, Alex Dumchus:

Choroszcz. There will Fota on gray, did not black, because deffektov a lot, mostly obtained by raspravke, painfully tender and malenkaya- little more than 20mm.

18.02.2015 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, well, when entot megazaval will overcome, deal n zhsta. Now the authors of the tab opposite the authors themselves do not appear who is currently online (((
Disorder: Even I do not see myself staying on the site))))

18.02.2015 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leptosia nina? Alexander, well, at least on such a gray Fota :)

18.02.2015 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This, too, likeCepora nerissaonly this time the female?

18.02.2015 16:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cepora nerissamale like?

18.02.2015 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2015 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2015 14:47, Irina Nikulina:

Rheumaptera hastata, I guess. The remaining 5 species 37 reg. also looked

18.02.2015 13:58, Alexander Belousov:

IErebia aethiops

18.02.2015 12:56, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Erebia melancholika?

18.02.2015 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.02.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2015 7:05, Alex Dumchus:

Shamil normal. Experiment Fota on a pink tone, then he lightened, in my opinion, to the natural color of the butterflies. One thing I will say, pink tone - not all butterflies. Still, the best fine white, well, or gray or light beige.

17.02.2015 23:30, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius cognatus

17.02.2015 23:30, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius cognatus

17.02.2015 23:29, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius cognatus

17.02.2015 23:26, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

17.02.2015 23:26, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

17.02.2015 22:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, and then the white balance is normal? .. Shade and even some pink ... (it's just fear)

17.02.2015 18:22, Fyodor Pudovikov:

That's just typical Zygaena viciae. In any case, I asked about the scope to doubts have disappeared.

17.02.2015 17:46, Alex Dumchus:

I gave this image, due to the bright yellow inserts on the rear wing, which is not very typical for the Papilio helenus (usually white or light yellow)

17.02.2015 0:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I apologize for having to go into someone else's discussion :)
It seems to me that this is justZygaena viciaesince Zygaena trifoliiSinev in Russia is not given. And the scope of the said viciae :))
P.S. Before he took viciae for trifolii: they are easily lured by my habit ....

16.02.2015 21:45, Nikolay Grebennikov:

30mm scope.

16.02.2015 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.02.2015 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.02.2015 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elymnias hypermnestra / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.02.2015 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elymnias hypermnestra / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.02.2015 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleksaedr it is :)

16.02.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ixias pyrene / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

16.02.2015 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ixias pyrene / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

16.02.2015 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is the same. Girl :)

16.02.2015 20:13, Fyodor Pudovikov:

What is the wingspan of her?

16.02.2015 19:57, Alex Dumchus:

Eurema blanda ???

16.02.2015 19:55, Alex Dumchus:

Well, Basil? Ixias pyrene or not?

16.02.2015 19:53, Alex Dumchus:

MB Elymnias hypermnestra?

16.02.2015 19:49, Alex Dumchus:

I kazhetsya- it, Basil. On the black somehow turns gloomy, look my previous shot Cyrestis sp- 39005. I will not black! We have Belousov, who turns and black on black, and I believe that life should be more light and bright colors ..

16.02.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Until inaccurate (it is variable)))) Alexander, and whiteflies (almost all) need to do on a dark background. Sam, unfortunately I can not master this technique ......

16.02.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

16.02.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

16.02.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia valeria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.02.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia valeria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.02.2015 15:13, Alex Dumchus:

Unfortunately, the picture does not convey a beautiful light blue butterfly wings.

16.02.2015 13:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, the view is not very. It's hard, two completely white butterflies from different semeyst (subfamilies) identify one photo. :) In the butterfly, nobody, even the issue, one or another form, there would be, and photo ??? :))

16.02.2015 13:07, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps she) think about Leucoma, but appeared in this perspective, a slightly different form of the wings and sprayed white scales on the wings thicker than the salicis, but for the kind of candida is not the time (beg. Of July).

16.02.2015 12:39, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Zygaena trifolii?

16.02.2015 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

To me, itLeucoma salicis

16.02.2015 12:01, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps the female American white butterflyHyphantria cunea? http://www.lepinet.fr/especes/nation/lep/?e=l&id=39200
http://www.jpmoth.org/Arctiidae/Arctiinae/Hyphantria_cunea.html
In Sinev it is only for Primorye (in Qual-ve an introduction / migrants), but the area of ​​distribution of this pest in recent years expanded more and more, and in neighboring Japan and China view already fairly widespread.

16.02.2015 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anaplectoides prasina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.02.2015 11:27, Irina Nikulina:

Anaplectoides prasina

16.02.2015 9:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gastropacha populifolia / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.02.2015 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, Yuri, you're wrong. This is another lasiocampidae.

16.02.2015 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta alni / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.02.2015 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta cuspis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.02.2015 7:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Angle is somewhat unusual, but it seems that it Euthrix laeta? Buck

15.02.2015 23:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius ultramarinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2015 23:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysozephyrus brillantinus Neozephyrus brillantinus.

15.02.2015 23:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2015 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2015 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2015 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2015 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius cognatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2015 21:50, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius taxila

15.02.2015 21:50, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius ultramarinus

15.02.2015 21:50, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

15.02.2015 21:49, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius taxila

15.02.2015 21:48, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius cognatus

15.02.2015 21:48, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius cognatus

15.02.2015 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A good site with a working search engine on leave (until finally osvoilego): http://clade.ansp.org/entomology/collections/peale/butterflies_moths.html

15.02.2015 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #39010 group.

15.02.2015 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

15.02.2015 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

14.02.2015 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #9392 group.

14.02.2015 21:46, Andrey Ponomarev:

Yes

14.02.2015 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Recently I megazaval at work, so that the site is only trifles. I think it'll be back to normal within two weeks.

14.02.2015 20:09, Peter Khramov:

How terrible zhyyyt ...

14.02.2015 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Andrey Ponomarev.

14.02.2015 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Andrey Ponomarev.

14.02.2015 15:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, I understand this one and # 9392 Butterfly?

14.02.2015 15:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

14.02.2015 15:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

14.02.2015 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Andrey Ponomarev.

14.02.2015 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yesterday sfotal before raspravkoy)

14.02.2015 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Andrey Ponomarev.

14.02.2015 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scardia boletella / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

14.02.2015 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scardia boletella / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

14.02.2015 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scardia boletella / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

14.02.2015 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She is))) Thank you. I stand.

14.02.2015 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very similar. :)))

14.02.2015 12:53, Andrey Ponomarev:

This hour is not Scardia boletella?

14.02.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just do not sesiidae Alexander. Actually the first time I see this. Does something like a moth or some ognёvki. Only hefty for these groups (range offhand about 5 cm.) And hairy hind legs. On raspravilke it now lay within.

14.02.2015 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil not sesiidae?

14.02.2015 10:49, Andrey Ponomarev:

Where is the one who left it?
Vasya and the date did not go wrong? Today, only 02/14/2015

14.02.2015 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena osterodensis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.02.2015 10:18, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Yes

14.02.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena osterodensis?

14.02.2015 0:35, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Euxoa nigrofusca (Esper, 1788)
(det. AJ matte) "In appearance, it can be said that this type of group Euxoa tritici - likely Euxoa nigrofusca .... kind of pattern and color is most similar to it nigrofusca."

14.02.2015 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It did not work out. Though like and birch and large goose and external pyrina .....
While I can not understand who I see for the first time ......

14.02.2015 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Zeuzera pyrina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

14.02.2015 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Zeuzera pyrina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

13.02.2015 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.02.2015 20:28, Alex Dumchus:

OK. Done

13.02.2015 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, now there are subspecies dopisat)))
Among these: ssp. verna H.Druce, 1874
And to that, first: ssp. yunnanensis Fruhstorfer, 1902
And as they say: "The fact hat" :)
This is Alexander, only you can do, in my LC.
I do not have such rights (

13.02.2015 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

13.02.2015 20:02, Alex Dumchus:

But, first, I have exhibited at the site earlier and sent to me, just north of Viet. So, what it is - to the second link.

13.02.2015 19:59, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, it seems. Of course, the first. I fished in the heart, from these points of 20-30 km.

13.02.2015 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK. Thank you.

13.02.2015 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

These sure. 2 subspecies there she sort of)))
Moreover, it is variable:
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/pie/20410020.html
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/pie/20410030.html
P.S. More inclined to the first subtype on the links :)

13.02.2015 18:21, Alex Dumchus:

62 mm

13.02.2015 18:19, Alex Dumchus:

That people is sometimes found :)

13.02.2015 18:18, Alex Dumchus:

I am sure that Ixias pyrene, Basil ??? I've got three different types, which differ by black dots on the front wings. Spreads, on display at the weekend.

13.02.2015 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's all in my way. The female is always for a male carries :)

13.02.2015 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ixias pyrene / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.02.2015 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ixias pyrene / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.02.2015 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ixias pyrene / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.02.2015 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ixias pyrene / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.02.2015 18:00, Alex Dumchus:

Please note: the female is always on top. She takes off at the slightest anxiety, dragging the male. A male remains alone with folded wings. This is how they :)

13.02.2015 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

The curator is only rated :(

13.02.2015 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Enough to know what subspecies viciae given for 17 of the region. But while it is not possible to know ((((
Subject to this zygaenidae valid for group supervisor. I do think he put an end to it or viciae cynarae)))

13.02.2015 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena osterodensis / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

13.02.2015 15:26, Fyodor Pudovikov:

This Zygaena osterodensis.

13.02.2015 15:25, Fyodor Pudovikov:

The site Entomological Museum Thomas Witt http://www.insecta-web.org/MWM/ lined with photos including pestryanok collection, which has a lot of subspecies Z. viciae. There subspecies with 6 points on the front wing and a red belt on the abdomen, for example http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/vk/dysplay_virt_koll.pl?id=615&fam=Zygaenidae&t= t_entry or http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/vk/dysplay_virt_koll.pl?id=614&fam=Zygaenidae&t=t_entry. So with Z. viciae not so simple, we need first of all the knowledge of the local fauna.

13.02.2015 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.02.2015 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.02.2015 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

12.02.2015 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So cynarae. Fedor rights. Red belt puts an end. That is how important the quality of the photo (first I sign this important and not see) .....
While not stand wait opinion Fedor :)))

12.02.2015 22:40, Nikolay Grebennikov:

viciae have no red belt on the belly

12.02.2015 21:53, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Hmm, is bigger in the viciae similar, while the rest featured on cynarae ...

12.02.2015 20:47, Nikolay Grebennikov:

The wingspan of 2.5 cm.

12.02.2015 20:12, Fyodor Pudovikov:

What she mm wingspan?

12.02.2015 20:11, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Z. osterodensis sure there is no more like a Z. minos, but securely from Z. purpuralis appearance is no different.

12.02.2015 20:07, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Perhaps Zygaena cynarae.

12.02.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Curator far gone? ))
ThisZygaena minoslikely. Z. osterodensis / purpuralis disappear in my opinion)))

12.02.2015 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena viciae?
Question curator especially :))

12.02.2015 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Since they need to be for a long time, and still can not have, I probably what can not predict. As soon as both at once will tell.

12.02.2015 14:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudochazara hippolyte / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

12.02.2015 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudochazara hippolyte / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

12.02.2015 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Goldia pacifica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2015 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus smaragdinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2015 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2015 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Speech about these pictures: 38952 and 29657

12.02.2015 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Where another photo?

12.02.2015 13:50, Alexander Belousov:

Pseudochazara hippolyte

12.02.2015 13:46, Irina Nikulina:

Goldia pacifica

12.02.2015 13:46, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus smaragdinus

12.02.2015 13:45, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius taxila

12.02.2015 12:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Leptidea morsei / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2015 12:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Leptidea morsei / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2015 12:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Nicholas! And what do you confirm this? Why do not you write the definition, since you know?

12.02.2015 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.02.2015 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus pseudaegon / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2015 8:43, Andrei Komrakov:

I excuse me - did not notice that photos uploaded this instance earlier. If no trouble, ask the site administrator to remove the excess. Sincerely, Andrew Komrakov.

11.02.2015 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea crenata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

11.02.2015 20:18, Basil Sergienko:

Apamea crenata

11.02.2015 19:44, Shamil Murtazin:

A light traps tents when they? .. =)

11.02.2015 13:22, Peter Khramov:

Not now, but there is a good chance that there will be a couple of weeks.

11.02.2015 8:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The third time I ask (hopefully last) - Is BOXES FOR COMMENT ???

10.02.2015 21:34, Peter Khramov:

This is not a gaffe. This is me such expressions are interspersed in the text, the way in 2008, when I finally zadalbyvat monotony of book descriptions. Expressions go along with the "old descriptions of" gradually (slowly and fitfully) are processed into a new format that is suitable for formalization.

10.02.2015 19:15, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2015 18:32, Irina Nikulina:

Leptidea morsei, male, second-generation

10.02.2015 13:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil (or Peter)! The text of the old descriptions of scoops grim http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7416 it would be necessary to remove the gaffe, but it is right in the search for Google / Yandex pops up immediately: "Moths fly in July and August. Caterpillars do not fly from August to May. "

10.02.2015 1:29, Yuri Semejkin:

All the "cigar" is not snimesh. Yes, sometimes I rented, but only if I see inside the caterpillar and its going to take ..

10.02.2015 1:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Attelabidae many species in Russia, as well as listovёrtok and each its own special kind of "roll-ups" At least :) photo "cigars" were. Maybe it for spices, and would say anything ......

10.02.2015 1:01, Yuri Semejkin:

I do not know, Vasily. Laying spiders found, but they are all in a sturdy white cocoon. But the bugs do not ever, but with the same sign and cocoons attelabidae seen and even shot, for example Byctiscus princeps (defined Lobanov).
But attelabidae a few others. "Tube". Yes, and a lot of layers there ponamotano. In listovёrtok less.

09.02.2015 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

To me she seems more like aBoloria euphrosynethe characteristic triangular spot at the edge sling http://fr.academic.ru/pictures/frwiki/66/Boloria_euphrosyne_%282%29_200506.JPG http://www.lepiforum.de/lepidopterenforum/lepiwiki/pics/jens_philipp/euphrosyne_Boloria_Bestimmungsschluessel_OS.jpg (Asian subspecies orphana and orientis slightly volatile, quite close to the nominative, so Europe. links).But even without the underside only inaccurate, because a close view of Boloria oscarus safely otlichetsya from euphrosyne only underside (the central spot of the middle sling and a more uniform color LC)

09.02.2015 17:39, Irina Nikulina:

Since already there are questions about the determined, I explain that although online redefinition wrote only under # 32750, were written off with Eugene about the two photos - this, and # 32750. # 32749 Yevgeny here have mistaken, there is just the right definition - davidi.

09.02.2015 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There may be Zhuchin eggs easily. REPRESENTATIVES family attelabidae (Attelabidae) in particular so come here and Russian family name speaks for itself :)
Before you upload should at least bring to the tracks, and even better to adult .....

09.02.2015 16:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, but sometimes spread like here and something determined. Well, I agree that there is no place for them. Against removal I do not mind.
As for the butterfly, not sure of her egg-laying, but not of leaf beetles. Taken with a lime tree, it has been collapsed into a roll, like some listovёrtok and ognёvkah.
After shooting wrapped back.

09.02.2015 16:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, are you sure that this is the butterfly eggs? Photos, which can not be defined, what of the spread?

09.02.2015 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas davidi / Evgeny Komarov Euphydryas ichnea / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas davidi / Evgeny Komarov Euphydryas ichnea / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 13:08, Evgeny Komarov:

This Photo # 32749 - Euphydryas ichnea (Boisduval, [1833]). My mistake. Determination Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea sutschana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 12:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Damora sagana / Confidently identified / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

09.02.2015 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia halimede / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 11:16, Irina Nikulina:

I agree, the male sagana

09.02.2015 11:11, Irina Nikulina:

Melanargia halimede

09.02.2015 10:59, Irina Nikulina:

Melitaea sutschana

09.02.2015 9:33, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2015 9:07, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2015 8:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Fly Boloria selenis (Eversmann, 1837)

09.02.2015 8:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius saphirinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 8:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrium eximius / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 8:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris arionides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 8:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris arionides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2015 8:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Damora sagana Doubleday, 1847

08.02.2015 23:44, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius saphirinus

08.02.2015 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Satyrium eximius

08.02.2015 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Phengaris arionides

08.02.2015 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Phengaris arionides

08.02.2015 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is desirable to specify wingspan.

08.02.2015 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis daphne / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2015 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis daphne / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2015 22:06, Irina Nikulina:

Brenthis daphne

08.02.2015 18:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia ajanensis / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

08.02.2015 18:26, Irina Nikulina:

I agree with Alexander, to review all the differences in detail http://pisum.bionet.nsc.ru/kosterin/eligea.htm

08.02.2015 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

08.02.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.02.2015 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Double- and stands there (did not see it). Sign like this one))))

08.02.2015 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

This photo is in place, you can take to Neoris schencki.

08.02.2015 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, there was not clear where it is now to put the photo :))))

08.02.2015 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

And the offspring where? :)))

08.02.2015 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.02.2015 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Established whose female: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=186837&view=findpost&p=1338475
I do not just guess where to dig (editable again .....

08.02.2015 16:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.02.2015 16:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, if this hybrid pairing, select types: Saturnia pavonia x Saturnia sp.

08.02.2015 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

08.02.2015 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

08.02.2015 14:55, Irina Nikulina:

With regard to these two types of primarily I want to say that to compare this image with images from the network completely useless if they show European Eno and Daphne. Both species are very volatile (especially strong geography.volatility looks Brenthis ino, is celebrated by all the authors, since Kurentsova) Therefore, you can only compare sub-species, particularly common in the region of Primorye. Primorye inhabit subspecies daphne - Brenthis daphne ochroleuca (around Primorye) and Brenthis daphne fumidia (the latter is more common in the south of Primorye) < / em>, and both differ significantly from daphne, inhabiting Europe.parts and in Siberia. View ino also represented in Primorye two podvidami- Brentis ino amuriensis and Brenthis ino maxima. . Both subspecies pattern on the underside brighter, richer than European ino, and the median strip has a violet-purple, and the whole underside bears little resemblance underside European ino, for which they are well different from European daphne.To illustrate this, give links to 2 common in the south of Primorye subspecies
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=193914&view=findpost&p=620007 B. i. maxima
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=193914&view=findpost&p=620010 B. d. ochroleuca
Compare with Yurin photos.By the nature of the picture, especially in the area postmarginal ZOC (but not the intensity of the black, which varies greatly among different copies), and especially on the outer part of the circular shape of the VC is also inclined toBrenthis ino. Of course, the underside would have given a more accurate conclusion.

08.02.2015 12:25, Yuri Semejkin:

The shape of the wing is really more like a B. daphne. In the spots, especially at first. KRL. generators virtually sling - from scanned images to a specified lean variant B. ino. At B. daphne spot once torn among themselves, and Fig. just like others.
Basil, I'm not saying. In an embodiment of a question mark. I like to see more people have spoken.

08.02.2015 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why for example do notBrenthis daphne? Without underside nothing to do here: it is for him, these two kinds of good differ. According Sinev 40 have both.

08.02.2015 10:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Brenthis ino ?

08.02.2015 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I decided to put this as a striking example of sexual dimorphism (variation) of the representatives of the same species.

08.02.2015 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.02.2015 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2015 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

07.02.2015 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

07.02.2015 19:35, Basil Sergienko:

So, why a picture? -smelo. Or are there other arguments?
The same issue and by the second image of this kind.

07.02.2015 12:43, Irina Nikulina:

I looked all Bolor (klossian) 37 reg, I think that itBoloria angarensishttp://rusinsects.com/nymph/nc-anga.htm http://babochki.narod.ru/ny44.html
In the Lower Amur region distributed subspecies of Boloria angarensis hakutozana (Matsumura, 1927), for which just a characteristic dimming http://www.flickr.com/photos/37256239@N03/3431692754 Note copies. the latest link in the assembled n. Mountain (at p. Lev.Silinka), it is very close to p.Vysokogorny Vanino district, where the picture is taken.

07.02.2015 9:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.02.2015 9:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.02.2015 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.02.2015 5:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Euphydryas ichnea (Boisduval, [1833]

07.02.2015 0:15, Shamil Murtazin:

Give each tent light traps! )

06.02.2015 21:47, Irina Nikulina:

It is not davidi, andEuphydryas ichnea

06.02.2015 21:44, Irina Nikulina:

I agree, of two species living in 37 reg, this is ichnea

06.02.2015 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Micronia aculeata?

06.02.2015 20:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

In connection with this photo I have a suggestion / request: to make the category of "staging a photo." It is obvious statement, but in some cases it is not clear, and could create a false impression about the behavior of certain species in nature.IMHO good if production is fairly stipulate the author (as opposed to "a photo in nature", which should be "natural" behavior of the species).

If this comment is inappropriate here, the admins can move it to the right place.

06.02.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spirama helicina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.02.2015 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spirama helicina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.02.2015 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No one drowned. Everything is okay. Material something on pins have all my :) Here in this lies the rub. Almost that our you know ....

06.02.2015 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well, as there was Stas))) ???

06.02.2015 8:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And what you do not understand - I also asked if there was a box for the tip - if there is, what and how much!

06.02.2015 6:40, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion this Euphydryas ichnea (Boisduval, [1833])?

05.02.2015 21:29, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, in Sinev subspecies P. a. pseudaegon No, because he was isolated in a separate view, and you can use your reference. Given the variability, I do not think that you can not reliably determine the underside view here. Yes, even all sorts of hybrid forms, which are more AI Kurentsov wrote (p.133) Perhaps we should rather look at the prevalence and intensity of the near-edge figure. In females, subsolanus , as a rule, on a PC or a near-edge band is not seen very little http://babochki.narod.ru/ly32.html http://www.nabistory.co.kr/nabi- htm / 74.htm I also recently put an exact female subsolanus http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/38748. Differences between the three types of top and underside is well shown here http: //yoda1.exblog.jp / 13254810 (clickable images). I have seen here pseudaegon , but this is more guesswork.

05.02.2015 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I stacked between layers of wool. I sprayed occasionally (once a month) from the sprinkler spray houseplants.
Stack should be in the lowest vegetable compartment (temperature it is advisable not below zero). This I did with Pavone - with them is quite simple: the pupa in a cocoon, and there is a microclimate.
It is desirable, of course, to the old cold.Without No Frost: if at all possible do not moisturize. But I doubt that even now there were such (

05.02.2015 20:50, Shamil Murtazin:

pupae are placed in the refrigerator? .. what and how often should be watered? .. =)

05.02.2015 20:36, Peter Khramov:

«What about otzyv- boxes?»
This sentence I do not understand.

05.02.2015 18:55, Alexander Belousov:

And I, of zhe.Somneniya there, but still I think it is closer to Limenitis helmanni duplicata f. pryeri . This, too, with a wide sash, and more reddish than Limenitis doerriesi.

05.02.2015 17:03, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander was ready to accept, and even wrote that this subspecies L. h. duplicata Staudinger, 1892, which stains more and strips wider than the nominative, but then saw that it Primorye, not hub. edge, and there is a very similar kind of undersideLimenitis doerriesihttp://rusinsects.com/nymph/nl-doer.htm http://flworld.com/index.php?mid=admingallery&search_target=tag&search_keyword=제이줄나비-네발나비과-Limenitis+doerriesi&document_srl=49478 Flight and habitats of these species overlap, doerriesi - kind of less common, but Yu Korshunova says that around the lake. Hanka (this Spassky district) doerriesi occur frequently in riverine thickets.
I took off last summer doerriesi http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33060 (there is no doubt doerriesi, becausehave the upper hand with a characteristic type feature) The location and the number of dots and stripes in the root zone is very typical for doerriesi, have helmanni, usually basal area "cleaner» http://rusinsects.com/nymph/nl-helm. htm, but this can be seen in your picture helmanni here online (+ some other features). And here in the message Gorbunov can be viewed in comparison http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php? showtopic = 190120 & view = findpost & p = 575321 But there is a snapshot of the network, which is confusing and speaks for L. h. duplicata http://catocala.narod.ru/nym08.html - and ekz.poyman near s.Hvalynka also Spassky district. In general, doubts remained. What do you think?

05.02.2015 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In 2013, in the locality where the tracks were imported species was found in the mass and in all stages.
But in the season of 2014, this pavlinoglazki there has not been met me once.Pofantaziruet :)
I think now established empirically possible reason why in 2014 did not meet a single copy of the form pupae are quite capable to winter for the second time :) Apparently this is due to the adverse external factors to derive .......

05.02.2015 15:04, Alexander Belousov:

Something I tuplyu, I can not attach a picture!

05.02.2015 13:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily where are you ??? Or is it drowning?

05.02.2015 13:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

February 11-12, must be repaired. What about otzyv- boxes?

05.02.2015 13:22, Yuri Semejkin:

By Korshunov from P. subsolanus sometimes noticeably blue-pollination at the roots or wider. Also in the description it says that the wells are located near Orange dark dots on the outer edge of the back. KRL. But these points are not visible, but there are dark spots above and below the hole.
P. pseudaegon. In this type of the female image is not found, across subspecies P. a. pseudaegon. Here is a link http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/ramukomjp/archive/2011/8/24?m=lc&p=1.But no blue of this subspecies. Also present in the image again blue sputtering.
It remains an option P. argus. ..... wings female brown with orange spots along the outer edge of the LEC. and not a single word about the presence of a blue spray.
Now Alexander, thanks to your question still say that rushed to the definition, all still need underside.But the possibility of determining in the future only on the top, do not rule.

05.02.2015 12:40, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, may have time to finish version. Computer somehow fix it?

05.02.2015 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri and females than for example Plebejus subsolanus, Plebejus pseudaegon differ from Plebejus argus, on the upper side?

05.02.2015 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aporia crataegi / Confidently identified / Male & female / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-aureum / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 9:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By the way, if there were screens - I after 4 weeks of leave before the end of March

05.02.2015 9:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There are boxes on the test / review, here are: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1977. I can send two people for the price of 700 pe
Another option box for your feedback. 30x40 glass, here are: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1906. 750 rubles to the recall, the amount in one hand without restrictions.

Ready to take on 1shtuke if the offer is not valid from 19.12 - then 2 pieces of 750 rubles

05.02.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis xanthomelas / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.02.2015 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.02.2015 7:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Plebejus argus (LINNAEUS, 1758) Female

05.02.2015 6:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Looked Alexander! In general, if you look at 37 the region, I am at your option P. cultralis amurensis (Romanoff, 1887).
Dr. Nearby alternatives I would call P. ussurialis (Bremer, 1864), know a few tops priostrёnnye lane. KRL. The nature of the bond of slightly different, the general background of KRL. . So that will have to delete it.
If we take al. Similar features of both species, they do not give.Take for example the color. In your version of the color pen. and ass. KRL. herein referred to as a light-yellow. In variant P. ussurialis color pen. and ass. KRL. yellow. . The same is true for others. Features (point in the median cell, veining) ..
In general, the fact that it was possible to see, I am at your option Paratalanta cultralis

05.02.2015 6:36, Alexander Belousov:

Polygonia c-aureum

05.02.2015 6:32, Alexander Belousov:

Limenitis helmanni

05.02.2015 6:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Polygonia c-aureum (Linnaeus, 1758)

05.02.2015 6:25, Alexander Belousov:

Nymphalis vaualbum

05.02.2015 6:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Nymphalis vaualbum

05.02.2015 6:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Nymphalis xanthomelas

05.02.2015 6:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Aporia crataegi

04.02.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

04.02.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

04.02.2015 21:06, Alexander Belousov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/specimen?user%5B%5D=1149&us=or&fem=on&ex=on&smore=&sless=&dry=on&prod=on&cco=&more=&less=&oc=or&om=or&tx=&oz=or&ocou=or&oregs=or&perpage=50&order=lat

04.02.2015 20:14, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, for example, a link ...

04.02.2015 20:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, thank you for the reminder, and you do these kinds of look? 37 In the region, only two similar species.

04.02.2015 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aricia artaxerxes / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Not identified.

04.02.2015 19:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Plebejus sp.

04.02.2015 18:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! For the kind of agreement, and the view ... It has been said http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27753, if this cultralis, it was not visually defined, especially on a picture.

04.02.2015 18:13, Vladimir Deryabin:

No, it's the only shot.

04.02.2015 18:09, Alexander Belousov:

Peter! Look for that problem. The collection of some specimens. in the gallery does not include the name of the species. Only the family is.

04.02.2015 17:45, Eugene Karolinskiy:

_semi_argus :)

04.02.2015 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Paratalanta cultralis ??

04.02.2015 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2015 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree :)

04.02.2015 12:05, Irina Nikulina:

And here, I think,Plebejus argus

04.02.2015 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Plebejus optilete / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2015 11:19, Irina Nikulina:

I agree with Aleksandrom.U subspecies Po amurica Kurentzov, 1970 is just such a large black pattern. And the butterflies themselves are larger. Females psevdoegon and subsolanus quite different.

04.02.2015 11:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis sydyi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2015 10:55, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis sydyi

04.02.2015 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis rivularis.

04.02.2015 10:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

04.02.2015 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

No race probably yes, but kind of morePlebejus optilete

04.02.2015 10:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Alternatively Plebejus argus coreana Tutt?

04.02.2015 9:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Down with this. tin-plate

04.02.2015 5:36, Alexander Belousov:

Neptis rivularis

03.02.2015 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

03.02.2015 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Simplicia griseolimbalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.02.2015 8:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha amaryllis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.02.2015 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Minois dryas / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

03.02.2015 7:54, Alexander Belousov:

Erebia ajanensis http://catocala.narod.ru/sa13_ar.html

03.02.2015 7:49, Alexander Belousov:

Minois dryas

03.02.2015 6:15, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, even fot instance is not present?

03.02.2015 4:41, Baryshenko Andrey:

Kunugia undans (Walker, 1855) ?

02.02.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please:
http://www.butterflycircle.com/showthread.php?14563-Some-Moths-That-Need-ID-(Part-5)&p=126633#post126633
And what an irony that?
Post # 7, the third link.
On the site it here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27078
Recently I went to the pictures on Google and came across badly familiar :)

02.02.2015 23:14, Shamil Murtazin:

already provide links to our website on foreign forums where the determination of a photo exhibit of butterflies (there are examples)
hy-hy ... interesting. let see =)

02.02.2015 21:27, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I certainly uchtu

02.02.2015 21:25, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

02.02.2015 18:50, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

02.02.2015 18:50, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

02.02.2015 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dynamics transferred fine, but seems to determine only guessing. :))

02.02.2015 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

You with the same accuracy kadrirute pictures: (((

02.02.2015 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2015 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2015 13:44, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Melitaea athalia(Rott...)?

02.02.2015 8:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Carterocephalus silvicola / Confidently identified / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

02.02.2015 8:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carterocephalus silvicola / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

02.02.2015 4:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Carterocephalus silvicola Meig.

02.02.2015 4:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Carterocephalus silvicola Meigen, 1829

02.02.2015 0:22, Irina Nikulina:

Well, Svetlana, I think that Native) Here, most likely, justSimplicia bimarginataor perhaps, schaldusalis , you need to watch, but I do. Unfortunately, I can not, the problem with the computer (temporary hopefully)

02.02.2015 0:05, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Irene, but this - there is not a close relative of # 33691 ???? Tattered just a little .....

01.02.2015 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Already provide links to our website on foreign forums where the determination of a photo exhibit of butterflies (there are examples) ......
Nicholas, no offense, but let's still taken seriously in its own image :)

01.02.2015 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna turca / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 21:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's just disrespectful to all visitors :(, good quality stuff, good quality raspravki, good picture quality, but can be cut exactly? And that you have become the norm. It may in fact be watching around the world. What do people think.

01.02.2015 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala nupta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 18:17, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2015 18:17, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Well I'm not an expert photographer) as that's how I try))

01.02.2015 17:27, Irina Nikulina:

Good flyCatocala nuptaSorry, Nicholas, I can not ask - and what caused such a careless framing (not the first time)?

01.02.2015 16:24, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna turcalikely. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Moths%20of%20Kagoshima/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3610Mythimna/3610Mythimna_turca/Mythimna%20turca.htm

01.02.2015 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea macrospila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diarsia canescens / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2015 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala promissa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.02.2015 13:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe biriviata / Vasiliy Feoktistov Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata / Basil Sergienko.

01.02.2015 10:28, Basil Sergienko:

It is rather X.quadrifasiata, but not biriviata

01.02.2015 7:28, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2015 0:52, Irina Nikulina:

3-4 dating sites likeIdaea macrospila(including at our cost)

01.02.2015 0:24, Irina Nikulina:

And she does not Calpinae and Pyralidae, and from Herminiinae appeared :) Simplicia many species in Borneo, but good different structure submarginal zone crimp sling color. As a result, he stopped two close species Simplicia griseolimbalis
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/04_HERMINIINAE/22_Simplicia/Simplicia%20griseolimbalis/Simplicia%20griseolimbalis.htm
and Simplicia bimarginata http://tai-herminiinae.blogspot.ru/2014/05/simplicia-bimarginata-walker-1863.html
http: //www.inaturalist.org / observations / 1180289 I think itSimplicia griseolimbalis, have bimarginata light zone is somewhat wider and brighter, a little less sinuous sling.

31.01.2015 21:56, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala promissa

31.01.2015 20:42, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2015 17:59, Irina Nikulina:

I also think that it is. I doubt between her and dahlii, did not write, but now revised, and this is where good photos persuaded http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=844& ( there have dahlii)

31.01.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Igor, I remind you that I do not associate in groups of butterflies for users on a permanent basis, and only bug fixes. Therefore, I ask you to associate your own custom groups :)

31.01.2015 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #38802 group.

31.01.2015 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

31.01.2015 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

31.01.2015 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna grandis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2015 16:46, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, I think mostMythimna grandis
http://catocala.narod.ru/noc320.html
(Form postbaz. sling at the lower edge of the VC, dark bar on the cost. region at the root of the VC)
http://catocala.narod.ru/noc171_a.html - Compare opaca

31.01.2015 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The 18th of January bore definition Irina vaguely remembered that somewhere already seen this vredina :)
And finally he found himself in the bins .....

31.01.2015 16:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Diarsia I would say canescens?

31.01.2015 15:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I looked in the internet. I will say now that it is the male Colias eurytheme

31.01.2015 15:44, Yuri Semejkin:

In my painting is female.

31.01.2015 15:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Too like Colias eurytheme Bdv. ?

31.01.2015 15:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mythimna opaca???

31.01.2015 15:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calophasia lunula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.01.2015 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Removing unnecessary bracket at the end of sentences.

31.01.2015 12:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil! A duplication of what? After all the time and place specified.

31.01.2015 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

31.01.2015 7:11, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2015 7:11, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2015 7:08, Nikolay Grebennikov:

female

31.01.2015 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2015 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alcis maculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.01.2015 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Avatha heterographa.

30.01.2015 23:56, Irina Nikulina:

Alcis maculata
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Boarmiini/boarmiini_36_3.php
http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/3f/e9/20.html

30.01.2015 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Parnassius phoebus / Yuri Semejkin Parnassius smintheus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.01.2015 23:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Satyrus ferula / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.01.2015 23:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Satyrus ferula / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.01.2015 23:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.01.2015 23:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.01.2015 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrus ferula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.01.2015 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrus ferula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.01.2015 22:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

1. Satyrus actaea does not live in Russia, it is the Western European view.
http://www.faunaeur.org/Maps/display_map_alternative.php?map_name=euro&map_language=en&taxon1=441568
2. Satyrus ferula usually has both male and female, two black eyes on the front wings. 1 here, but I think it is a variation. yet the difference between good and Satyrus ferula Satyrus actaea look here:
http://rarefree.fr/interactif/photos%20nymphalidae/3454.jpg
http://rarefree.fr/interactif/photos%20nymphalidae/3455.jpg

30.01.2015 21:09, Nikolay Grebennikov:

and why?

30.01.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.01.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.01.2015 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I was reinsured :) Though confident in her with very high probability.
Yes, and there is exactly the same form it: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_1_5.php
Fast forward a minute I had her in the exact :)

30.01.2015 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If the United States then it is likely not Parnassius phoebus, andParnassius smintheusssp. sternitzkyi McDunnough, 1936 (he just has such a subspecies) :)
But to Parnassus'm cold and it could be wrong. Wanted more opinions :)

30.01.2015 17:54, Yuri Semejkin:

The label has a subspecies sternizkyi. But it is not here, so I do not know, indicate it or not?

30.01.2015 16:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lophoptera squammilinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.01.2015 16:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lophoptera squammilinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.01.2015 16:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

I can only, without well :))
It is not Satyrus actaea. 100%
It is likely Satyrus ferula.

30.01.2015 15:32, Irina Nikulina:

Descriptions revered here without doubtLophoptera squammilinea, there are good signs of differences from lineigera, moreover it is the only closely related species with a wingspan of 36-38 mm (at lineigera - 28-30). Kind of have to do)

30.01.2015 15:11, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Well, somebody can give a comment?

30.01.2015 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

And here it is difficult, it is necessary to look and description of differences from other species. :(

30.01.2015 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

How is it: scalded with milk, blows on the water. :))
Basil, here it seems to me that you are reinsured.

30.01.2015 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Type of extremely volatile so only inaccurate .....
http://www.papua-insects.nl/insect%20orders/Lepidoptera/Euteliidae/Stictopterinae/Stictoptera/Stictoptera%20cucullioides.htm

30.01.2015 12:59, Yuri Semejkin:

I looked briefly, found in google just one shot http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iphiclides_podalirinus Distribution of China, Tibet.

30.01.2015 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lophoptera lineigera?

30.01.2015 12:17, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, I have, in a second time with bug fixes podalirinusom. Apparently, all have very hotstsa ... even photos, but alas ... a very rare butterfly. Cost male on ebey started from $ 250 at auction, and this is much more expensive than T.aureus or B.lidderdalii ...

30.01.2015 11:51, Yuri Semejkin:

That's right, Alexander! There is no objection, on the label and it is written. This I inadvertently stuck the letter n, and that turned out podalirinus, instead podalirius L.

30.01.2015 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Iphiclides podalirinus / Yuri Semejkin Iphiclides podalirius / Alex Dumchus.

30.01.2015 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Iphiclides podalirinus / Yuri Semejkin Iphiclides podalirius / Alex Dumchus.

30.01.2015 10:33, Alex Dumchus:

Especially from Moldova. Of course Podalirius. In podaliriNusa other habitat.

30.01.2015 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio aegeus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

30.01.2015 8:58, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio aegeus, female

30.01.2015 8:57, Alex Dumchus:

Wrong. This is a common Iphiclides podalirius, without the "n". Female. I can give her ph 5-10. Usual we in the south of the butterfly. A PodaliriNus extremely rare. Yuri, look in Google Photos.

30.01.2015 8:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determined to Oleg Baking molbiol.ru.

30.01.2015 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atrachea jankowskii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.01.2015 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

But this, it seems,Atrachea japonica?
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3767_Atrachea/3815_Atrachea_japonica/Atrachea%20japonica.htm The Japanese write that the rarest species of the genus (them). Early autumn scoop. From 4 LW species not found picture Atrachea alpherakyi Kononenko, 1986 (= jankowskii (Alpheraky, 1897)

29.01.2015 22:36, Irina Nikulina:

Atrachea jankowskiiThis scoop was picked Oleg Pekarsky here http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235015&view=findpost&p=1416247 (and this image we have on the site, but without reference to determined the )

29.01.2015 18:59, Irina Nikulina:

There is even more interesting :) Maybe too shabbyCucullia pustulata?? http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=190139&view=findpost&p=825364 (Although to me it seemed like all over Europe.Cucullia lactucaehttp://catocala.narod.ru/noc211.html But lactucae after further Zabaikalye not?)

29.01.2015 18:16, Irina Nikulina:

I understand) 3 days look, saw all discussions on molbiole, hoping just for you with Basil. Methodically and several times to view all 17 ET)

29.01.2015 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergienko need to connect :)) but for a photo in nature?!?!

29.01.2015 17:58, Irina Nikulina:

Here guess yetCucullia lucifugahttp://catocala.narod.ru/noc76_a.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Cuculliinae/Cucullia_lucifuga.html (There were doubts about the subspecies C. p. Fraterna )

29.01.2015 17:55, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, and other 2nd hope for help, not sure that there is the same kind now write.

29.01.2015 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia pustulata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2015 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Il y Berlova correctly, it Cucullia pustulata fraterna Butler, 1878, is very similar. name of a subspecies, we can not finish, it can only make the author to stand Cucullia pustulata. Mark the other photos with this kind that do not I look :))

29.01.2015 17:22, Irina Nikulina:

3 photo kapyushonnits has long been hanging venture to still offer a definition. I reviewed all types of the 37th Region (Sinev of their 17). I think that thereCucullia pustulata. In Berlova - a subspecies of the Cucullia pustulata fraterna Butler, 1878 http://catocala.narod.ru/noc327.html on our website appearance pustulata (a subspecies fraterna) is there, but the view is not indicated for the Russian Federation. The Catalogue for the WFD SinevCucullia fraternagiven a separate species (the book, not on site) (to jpmoth - also http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Cuculliinae/Cucullia_fraterna.html)
Apparently, it's already obsolete data and it is necessary to correct the geography of the site?

29.01.2015 16:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acosmetia chinensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2015 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dalima mjoebergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.01.2015 16:02, Irina Nikulina:

Butterfly fly, drawing several zatёrt, and yet I would venture to suggest that itAcosmetia chinensis(= Hadjina chinensis auct.) Http://catocala.narod.ru/noc312.html
http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Hadeninae/Hadjina_chinensis.html

29.01.2015 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Battus devilliersii / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.01.2015 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Battus devilliersii / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.01.2015 15:36, Alex Dumchus:

Coming soon is just Battus devilliersii, Cuba

29.01.2015 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Yuriy Karpov.

29.01.2015 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea foedata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2015 11:20, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea foedata, is likely
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Sterrhinae/Idaea_foedata.html
http://blog.daum.net/hangusuk/549

29.01.2015 9:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus subsolanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2015 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus subsolanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2015 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atara arata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2015 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupido argiades / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2015 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2015 22:55, Irina Nikulina:

Plebejus subsolanus, female. I think that ssp.barabash Churkin & Zhdanko, 2003. On the underside PC second from bottom spot median band usually stands out shape and size, which is characteristic of this subspecies
http://www.gorodinski.ru/view_lycaenidae.php?id_lycaenidae=46

28.01.2015 22:54, Irina Nikulina:

Plebejus subsolanus

28.01.2015 22:53, Irina Nikulina:

Atara arata

28.01.2015 22:53, Irina Nikulina:

Cupido argiades

28.01.2015 22:52, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena dispar

28.01.2015 16:50, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, understood, Sasha, thank you. I think such issues arise more than once, yesterday Cucullia understand, there is also a discrepancy with the Catalogue Sinev later write, understand, please, dear moderators)

28.01.2015 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Earlier, in the recent past was considered a synonym Heliothis maritima adaucta Heliothis maritima bulgarica subspecies Heliothis maritima After studies Fibiger currently Heliothi adaucta considered independent species that is on our website.
Two solutions:
1.Ubrat as a kind Heliothi adaucta and bring it into subspecies Heliothis maritima;
2. Combine the information Heliothi adaucta and Heliothis maritima under the guise Heliothi adaucta.and then create a new page view Heliothis maritima, where it is only for Western Europe. The issue is complex and the Japanese until Kononenko lead Heliothi maritima as a single species. On faunaeur two species, but confused by the spread.
Waiting Knyazev.

28.01.2015 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, you're right that initially it was decided that there was some sort of stability as a basis to take the catalog of blue. Now the situation has changed Institute curators appeared that in such moments can make a decision. Vasily full rights in terms of taxonomy. A small problem in the Asian part of Russia for two scoops curator.I looked at the site Svyatoslav adaucta. Now I'll try to put everything in place, if possible. :))

27.01.2015 20:16, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, Basil, on jpmoth.org Berlova and I looked and saw that there Hm adaucta Butler, 1878. But it was initially decided to adhere to the Russian Catalog ed. Sinev, here on it I specified.

27.01.2015 19:44, Basil Sergienko:

Just looked Fauna Evropea, there is carried out and to the center and to the south and Russia to the east

27.01.2015 19:37, Basil Sergienko:

Well, why have Berlova and Japanese is true as a subspecies Maritima. The NE is normal view

27.01.2015 19:21, Irina Nikulina:

Basil, clarified once again - in the RFE 2 types - maritima and ononis (the latter only in the Amur region. And Primorye). Adaucta general for the RF is omitted.

27.01.2015 17:18, Basil Sergienko:

Like the Russian Far East adaucta, maritima kind of Europe

27.01.2015 15:33, Irina Nikulina:

Heliothis maritima

27.01.2015 15:33, Irina Nikulina:

Heliothis maritima

27.01.2015 15:33, Irina Nikulina:

Heliothis maritima

27.01.2015 1:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Interesting site for butterflies: http://www.neutron.phys.ethz.ch/Lepidoptera/

26.01.2015 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15691 group.

26.01.2015 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15687 group.

26.01.2015 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15711 group.

26.01.2015 10:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! When you're ready to transfer material- Report. Please pack so that it is ready for sending by mail, as sister pack can not (do not understand this)

26.01.2015 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Geography then confused :)

26.01.2015 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.01.2015 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesudra divisa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.01.2015 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesudra divisa / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2015 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neophasia menapia / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

25.01.2015 18:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Neophasia menapia

25.01.2015 17:00, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I may be wrong in something)

25.01.2015 16:59, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

25.01.2015 13:16, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Satyrus actaea male?

25.01.2015 11:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deileptenia mandschuriaria / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.01.2015 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zanclognatha lunalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.01.2015 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrius convolvuli / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.01.2015 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Conistra fletcheri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.01.2015 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Conistra ardescens / Alexandr Zhakov Conistra fletcheri / Irina Nikulina.

25.01.2015 11:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichosea mjobergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2015 11:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichosea mjobergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2015 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tiracola aureata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.01.2015 9:44, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

25.01.2015 0:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you.

25.01.2015 0:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea didyma / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

25.01.2015 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Museums with collections will bend / sold off in the nineties. What will survive - survive on enthusiasm.

24.01.2015 23:30, Igor Sakhno:

There would be more in the future, only those museums ...

24.01.2015 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just in case:
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/serrodes/serrodes_2_8.php
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/15_EREBINAE/019_Avatha/Avatha%20tepescens/Avatha%20tepescens.htm

24.01.2015 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bracca georgiata Bracca maculosa.

24.01.2015 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bracca georgiata Bracca maculosa.

24.01.2015 18:33, Irina Nikulina:

Agrius convolvulidark shape of a caterpillar http://www.amentsoc.org/publications/bulletin/articles/convolvulus-hawk-moth-larvae.html http://www.jpmoth.org/Sphingidae/Sphinginae/Agrius_convolvuli. html

24.01.2015 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Smerinthus planus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.01.2015 17:53, Irina Nikulina:

Smerinthus planuslast age? In the region of 40 Smerinthus only caecus more lives, but he has other tracks.

24.01.2015 17:04, Irina Nikulina:

Euphyia unangulata, perhaps? The 37 reg there (except it only cineraria)

24.01.2015 13:38, Irina Nikulina:

Sash, I also definitively determined by http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/framepage_hadeninae4.html and also write 3 things that I bowed to the fletcheri : 1. In ardescens a dark area in the lower kidney-shaped spot is small and contrasting different from DOS. Background, from fletcheri , it does not stand out as a contrast, the same color as a dark sash extending from the spot (as in this photo) and 2.the shape and size of the top reniform spots - from ardescens it is often small, bright, round, at the fletcheri - large, almost the background color, but with a light trim at the sash 3. Radical < em> fletcheri have, single, with a projection, sometimes triangular (biglobe.ne.jp and as in the photo) close to the bone and have ardescens it is wider, as if double, especially evident on the 3rd photo here http: //www.jpmoth.org / ~ dmoth / 80_Noctuidae / 23Hadeninae / 3705_Conistra / 3705_Conistra_ardescens / Conistra% 20ardescens.htm
I agree that volatile, but photos and other links somehow outweighed doubts :)

24.01.2015 12:43, Irina Nikulina:

It is in both photos, endemic to Borneo. Nearest androdes Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia is very different.

24.01.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my backTrichosea mjobergi: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/05_NOCTUIDAE/06_PANTHEINAE/03_Trichosea/Trichosea%20mjobergi/Trichosea%20mjobergi.htm
More like no one there does not come to mind as he wrote yesterday: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30052

24.01.2015 12:08, Irina Nikulina:

I looked all 9 Zanclognatha 37 region and 5 more seaside just in case. I thinkZanclognatha lunalishttp://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Herminiinae/Zanclognatha_lunalis.html. Doubts were only about Zanclognatha triplex http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Herminiinae/Zanclognatha_triplex.html http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Korea0606/80_Noctuidae/Zanclognatha_triplex/Zanclognatha_triplex.htm

24.01.2015 0:04, Irina Nikulina:

And it may well be, given its strong variability) Very good picture goes.

23.01.2015 23:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Podmoreny slightly (

23.01.2015 23:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Datanoides fasciatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.01.2015 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Finder quickly locates all. :) I had doubts between these two species, but compared on jpmoth and stopped at ardescens. very similar, but has taken into account the form of the bond: basal and outer ardescens have it as it consists of polulunok, while fletcheri like solid with a slight bend. I can view a hindrance. But both highly volatile, can someone else will speak.Let's wait, but doubts arose. :))

23.01.2015 23:24, Irina Nikulina:

Datanoides fasciatus
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/62_Pyralidae/6002_Pyralinae/60021401_Datanoides_fasciatus_1897/Datanoides_fasciatus.htm
http://www.jpmoth.org/Pyralidae/Pyralinae/Datanoides_fasciatus.html
But it seems no longer fly (

23.01.2015 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, and I saw it more as aConistra fletcheriLook, please. Dame, just a lot of links that you do not look
http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/framepage_hadeninae4.html
http://www7a.biglobe.ne.jp/~satoyama/tensuzikiriga.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8706930@N08/3404126232/
http://photozou.jp/photo/show/176754/171396707
http://gairoto.cocolog-nifty.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2013/10/16/s.jpg

23.01.2015 22:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

It expressed at lepiforum.de Jürgen Rodeland the assumption that the image belongs to the species Tegostoma lepidalis. (there are two photos). I looked at boldsystems.org, really it looks like, but still in the family Anthophilopsis.

23.01.2015 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anthophilopsis baphialis / Alexandr Zhakov Anthophilopsis lepidalis / Ozgur Kocak.

23.01.2015 19:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Welcome to 20.00

23.01.2015 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm in it :)

23.01.2015 19:28, Peter Khramov:

I can now Skype. Let's at 20.00 Moscow?

23.01.2015 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I agree with you that we must solve. Indeed let us in Skype talks and that it is desirable to Perth pulled :)
I ask the question, what would understand the situation. I see what the problem is. Let's go on to the contrary, what do you want the names of the options? In order to be able to find on the site appearance. From here, and we must dance. :)

23.01.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, we do not Asking questions, and try to solve them :) I put forward its proposal.
Just porazvernutee:
Previously it was thought that it is one kind, and then it was divided into two separate and valid the same type, then logically the whole name of the second type should not be equated with a first name, and should be considered obsolete.And so it should be removed from the column "The full name of"
It kind of Tarsolepis sommeri (Hübner, [1821]), there are now online in parallel with Tarsolepis remicauda Butler, 1872 to which it is somehow equated, although they are two different species, besides standing in the same genus.
If earlier it was believed, and now there is - so out of date and do not need to equate it with the second kind.

23.01.2015 18:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

InsteadDeileptenia mandschuriaria?

23.01.2015 18:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil now please write what do you mean by sinonimamim you podrozumevaesh under the old name, and how to display the incorrect indication of this type of literature, and what to do with generic combinations. :)))

23.01.2015 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Of the 6 species of this genus for the 37 and 40 region, only 6 species, of which only looks like this :)
But is only 40 region. It is desirable to clarify.

23.01.2015 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Conistra ardescens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.01.2015 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I will make a timid suggestion :)Trichosea mjobergi?
Based on the fact that the moths of borneo is given one species of the genus: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/pantheinae/gallery.php

23.01.2015 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lord about: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/67661 (so as not to continue on the page type) :)
Now I dispute is seen as follows:
1) Leave in the "Full Name" is only valid at the moment, the specific name and its synonyms.
2) Make a separate column "Obsolete names" which remove all those upon detection of n.1 :)
If there is a technical possibility, of course.
As the saying goes: "And the wolves are fed and the sheep intact" :)

23.01.2015 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.01.2015 16:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I got confused with them. One male turned out to be "incomplete" (without the underside), and dates do not understand. They are all different (

23.01.2015 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.01.2015 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #25499 group.

23.01.2015 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.01.2015 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.01.2015 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.01.2015 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.01.2015 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.01.2015 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.01.2015 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.01.2015 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.01.2015 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.01.2015 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.01.2015 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15681 group.

23.01.2015 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15679 group.

23.01.2015 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15684 group.

23.01.2015 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15677 group.

23.01.2015 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15664 group.

23.01.2015 15:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35400 group.

23.01.2015 15:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

23.01.2015 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.01.2015 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.01.2015 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put albescens :) So asked just in case. Just a little different both :)
Honestly I did not want to expose her, and looked - different. Well, I put :)
CITES among other things. While in Malaysia, a lot of them and they sit there in the mud like we Nymphalis xanthomelas ......

23.01.2015 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)) At one point may be only one subspecies.

23.01.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also albescens? In the same terms as the previous one.

23.01.2015 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Written descriptions described in the two years (1854-1855) 4 types with one and the same name varians, And Trilocha varians described either in 1854, or 1855 to various sources. Another smash his head with entering it on the site :))

23.01.2015 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, replace it, and it will remain so with trembling hands. :)) And rotate 7 degrees clockwise :))

23.01.2015 1:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tiracola aureata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.01.2015 0:47, Irina Nikulina:

I am leaning toward Trilocha varians http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/66_Bombycidae/64.2%20Prismostictinae/2987.2Trilocha%20varians/Trilocha%20varians.htm https://www.flickr.com/photos/nzbear5/7476161828/in/photostream/
I doubt between this view andOcinara bifurcula http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/80_BOMBYCOIDEA/05_BOMBYCIDAE/03_Ocinara/Ocinara%20bifurcula/Ocinara%20bifurcula.htm https://www.flickr.com/photos/nzbear5/7476161622/in/photostream/ (Although it is a question of different sorts, on mothsofborneo indicate a greater resemblance species of these genera) On boldsystems.org photo absolutely unreadable (http: //www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=326340 and http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php / Taxbrowser_Taxonpage? taxid = 297 980 Online photo of both species, especially varians , a lot, do not give references, I think with some definitions to the amateur photo mess. Reliable photos in an article about the karyotype Trilocha varians http://jinsectscience.oxfordjournals.org/content/12/1/49
Both genera site is not, perhaps, Ocinara a synonym for Penicillifera , but Trilocha -?

23.01.2015 0:43, Irina Nikulina:

Tiracola aureatacm. Comment. to # 33804 and # 33498

22.01.2015 21:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

22.01.2015 21:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

22.01.2015 21:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Crop the picture was difficult?

22.01.2015 21:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea didyma / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

22.01.2015 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.01.2015 16:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The basis for the transfer by the author comments.

22.01.2015 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tarsolepis sommeri Tarsolepis remicauda.

22.01.2015 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tarsolepis sommeri Tarsolepis remicauda.

22.01.2015 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What I think is familiar place ....
I served the first six months in the army, 20 km away. to the east of the station Yablonovy :)
True Parnas not seen butPapilio xuthusflies .....
Oh, the army: special and catch something once (and that collected in kaptёrke died later (
The sadness and nostalgia ....

22.01.2015 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius bremeri / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

22.01.2015 4:41, Yuri Semejkin:

The name is taken from the label. But what has to Lancaster Alabama and that it generally did not understand. Settlements or geographical point of that name in this state is not found.

21.01.2015 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio woodfordi Papilio ptolychus.

21.01.2015 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio woodfordi Papilio ptolychus.

21.01.2015 22:07, Alex Dumchus:

Please move to Papilio ptolychus. On the label was written P.woodfordi ptolychus. Habitat as at P.ptolychus, but woodfordi

21.01.2015 20:43, Alex Dumchus:

Basil . The network just mess with them there. In Zeryntha only 2 types: polyxena and rumina, but please rest in Allanckastr- s

21.01.2015 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Coley went to a booze :) focuses on the issue of Alexander Dumchusa with whom I agree completely.
Here are these two tribes in Parnassinae my absolute chaos going on.
Pay especially attention to the kind of Allancastria and Zerynthia:
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/475
http: // lepidoptera.ru / taxonomy / 23924
Truth and network with them like a mess (
It should be the case once in order to bring (scatter relying on the place) :)
I myself can not understand anything (

21.01.2015 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.01.2015 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.01.2015 18:07, Alex Dumchus:

Labels are usually at least some, but there, in the very least, the geography of the country, and on precision and on time, I can say that very many commercial species (and also non-profit, for example H. bolina, D. julia et al.) is particularly sailboats, partly nymphs.and Saturn is now grown in nurseries, and often in other countries - so the hell then I fuck the place, time, and especially name the catcher?

21.01.2015 18:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nicholas, I hastened to transfer part. If you are not immediately entered the definition, now we need to wait until the moderator will take and they do not need to adjust. But the reverse side of the photo, it is desirable, but it is not exactly happen until inaccurate can not stand waiting for the bottom side. :)

21.01.2015 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea didyma / Confidently identified / Nikolay Grebennikov.

21.01.2015 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) I looked, and therefore asked the question, can you think of their valid birth, but had to put in a subgeneric rank, but just opyachatka :), then all is well. :)

21.01.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subgenus, Alexander, of course :) That I am sealed in the last sentence. Look where they are made on the links :)

21.01.2015 17:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I do not argue: the overall trend is very bad, that talk about it .....
Here, if people would not buy bezetiketochny material, then traders would be thinking about how they live on :)

21.01.2015 17:14, Alex Dumchus:

I did.

21.01.2015 17:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Valid in the rank of genus or subgenus?

21.01.2015 17:11, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. We are not talking about personalities, but the general trend.

21.01.2015 17:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then ebay :) That's about it and spores. There's not usually write in the Public Information label for specific reasons. Another thing is when the real stuff, on receipt without labels. In Lehi zhtiketka the fact that he is always a catch.

21.01.2015 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reset.

21.01.2015 16:58, Peter Khramov:

And now let us enter the ACC ebee your good friend and look at the label, yeah -))
What controversy, citizens?

21.01.2015 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The subgenus Pazala Moore, 1888 made: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120633
Did the same subgenus Chilasa Moore, 1881 : http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120634
Both kinds are valid and have been made with reference to an authoritative source.
Alexander, you're on the pages species then write one to endure. It is to Peter: I do not do such translations :)

21.01.2015 16:17, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

21.01.2015 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I, Alexander the material is not from ebay, and from my good friend who goes there to catch himself and simply divided friendly material. And in the summer we with him often lost in Meshchora (collect insects, fungi, etc.). So, for the accuracy of Malaysian label I can vouch skzat head :)

21.01.2015 15:33, Alex Dumchus:

"... Many traders do not comply with these rules" - all traders, Basil. Even on ebey even gathered themselves !!!

21.01.2015 15:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, the data about the place of collection, including the name of the collector is always indicated on the label, so it is accepted in science, and it is necessary for private .What collection fees, there is really the name of the collector for anything, there is only enough sample. Everything else unless they themselves raised under the big question.

21.01.2015 15:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, and anything funny. In accordance with the rules of geographic label must include: the date of collection, gathering geography, and the name of the collector should all this must be specified. The only trouble is that many traders do not comply with these rules, but this is an isolated incident.In the specific case of butterfly collection a serious scientific organization which should (just have to) be literate labels. Another thing is if you lost ... Here Yuri is right: nothing to do with it.

21.01.2015 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! Throw the phone in the mail. To my sister - agree on how to convey the material.

21.01.2015 14:49, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. Well ... I laugh surname garbage !!! How I got the material from abroad, even from law-abiding Europe ... never ... I did not see the name of the collector, in fact, even the capture of the month - just about. You can only answer for myself caught butterflies. As for Murphy's Law: the best work, the cat. made himself

21.01.2015 14:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, I know .. Just over the years, there Does decade - a collection or part repeatedly moved that happened to her during that time .......... As a result, not from each sample can take full infu . Somewhere in there, somewhere in there. Suggestions for possible uchtu.

21.01.2015 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, even such a request. If you have the opportunity to retake the material be labeled, please write more and geographical data + date of capture. Note this information on the site is very useful and necessary.
P.S. And for the collection material is also the name of the collector (in the well-written label for centuries, it is indicated).

21.01.2015 14:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, and probably not someone once keep track of everything. Entomologists one, two and mute. Current work probably suffice.

21.01.2015 14:22, Yuri Semejkin:

The provided name is taken from the label, which lists the contents of the box. Troides taken from the labels pinned on a pin with the sample. Which of them are valid, what is not, I do not know.

21.01.2015 14:15, Alex Dumchus:

What sort of academy, which do not follow titles (1930 and probably hanging :)

21.01.2015 14:12, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. Well here so here. I propose to add to the subgenus Graphium Pazala: alebion, eurous, mandarinus, tamerlanus, glycerion. Oh, and apparently mandarinus alebion should be there and not in Paranticopsis.
And what about zadvoeniya A. and Z. caucasica, I want to give a photo

21.01.2015 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri just brought the old name :)
It is necessary to add the name of the subspecies in LC thus: ssp. kaguya (Nakahara et Esaki, 1930)

21.01.2015 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.01.2015 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Troides aeacus / Confidently identified / Male / Yuri Semejkin.

21.01.2015 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides aeacus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

21.01.2015 14:00, Alex Dumchus:

It TROIDES aeacus, male

21.01.2015 13:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio aeacus kaguya Nakahara et Esaki , 1930

21.01.2015 13:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio aeacus kaguya Nakahara et Esaki , 1930 = Troides

21.01.2015 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hypotheses already :) I agree that waiting for topic curator, and his verdict. And no where is not tolerated. You can still have the Witt in the collection to see what can be clarified. :)

21.01.2015 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something dispute under the picture comes to matters of classification - the disorder. I propose to transfer all the comments on the establishment of its kind in the appropriate topic: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/18428 :)

21.01.2015 8:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, there can not be in haste. I can not single-handedly take such decisions while you fully support.
Peter, here are a couple reasons for creating Chilasa Moore, 1881 as a separate type of transfer to the relevant species:
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/search/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=5907.0&&
http://en.butterflycorner.net/Genus-CHILASA.1195.0.html
Rod is not difficult to create.Let's solve this thing? Or wait until a curator of tropical Papilionidae?

21.01.2015 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, an hour to edit my is not given in fact (emphasis much less time).
Check please.

21.01.2015 8:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here I think in general can only clarify the curator of the group on the site.
A focus on a few olinakovyh photos online from one author can not:
http://dogalhayat.org/turler/zygaena-punctum-malatina/
That's the same with the other subspecies of appearance:
http://dogalhayat.org/property/zygaena-punctum-malatina-2/

21.01.2015 7:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I quote my correspondence with Bolshakov (it is in the public domain for the reduced me the link):
02.01.2014 07:58 vasiliy-feoktistov
Lord, here such a question arose: is there-somewhere zygaenidae Zygaena (Mesembrynus) rubicundus (Hübner, [1817]) from Turkey? Here I think the wrong definition: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26224 (explicit rubicundus of habitus), and must be corrected, and all kind of just from Italy is

02.01.2014 9:50 Laurus Bolshakov
zygaenidae often in appearance are not definable. It is necessary to the genitals of the exhibit. According to the summary Efetov (only available to us the author, who can be trusted), the specified type anywhere except Italy lives.

P.S. Link to lepiforum where there is currently a photo of this subspecies from the same author: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl? Zygaena_Punctum
In short: it is necessary genitals .....

21.01.2015 7:19, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. I do not like, and kind! Consider that I have clarified. Total species: agestor,
epycides, slateri, clytia, paradoxa, veiovis, osmana, arolinensis, laglaizei, toboroi, moerneri, Please bring race.
Besides, I already wrote about zadvoenie Allancastria and Zerynthia, this is not the tropics, but still nothing fixed.

21.01.2015 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you have to be a person on the basis of English. You write here briefly the meaning, and I'll translate. And by the way here: http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Zygaena&country[]=22 (if the euro part of Turkey in the picture). Ie vaapsche nifiga similar.

20.01.2015 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Urapteroides astheniata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.01.2015 23:49, Irina Nikulina:

Urapteroides astheniata

20.01.2015 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No one has overseen the tropics, Alexander. It is in "free flight" (
Chilasa And here comes in many synonyms Papilio. Although it is checked: Chilasa like a separate genus. Let's hope that someone will clarify definitively :)

20.01.2015 21:34, Alex Dumchus:

Rhode Chilasa, as a rule, all the mimics. Particularly interesting laglaizei,
toboroi and moerneri, mimicking a uranyl Alcides, unfortunately, they are very rare and I do not have in the collection: (((.

20.01.2015 21:29, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

20.01.2015 21:29, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Melitaea didyma male

20.01.2015 21:28, Alex Dumchus:

Double. I wrote about it back in July.

20.01.2015 21:27, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. This kind Chilasa, is not presented as a kind of on our site, but all represented. I have already written. Actually, who are we in charge of sailing? There are "schools" ... In general paradoxa - rare and valuable butterfly.

20.01.2015 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Optical illusion" :)
At first I thought it was another Euploea sp. of the Nymphalidae-> Danainae .....
And then, on closer examination it turned out to be quite a butterfly from another family: Sailing (Papilionidae) : http://yutaka.it-n.jp/pap/10240020.html
It seems - be a fairly common phenomenon.Some sailboats successfully mimic poisonous representatives of the subfamily Danainae to be left alone predators:
FemalesPapilio dardanusmimics poisonous monarch of the genera Amauris and Danaus . There is unfortunately no females of a sailboat, but may someday :).
SailboatPapilio agestorquite accurately mimics the monarchParantica sita....
There is no limit to perfection :)

20.01.2015 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah. Thank you :)
And judging by the fact that once went from catcher 3 copies - a beast out there quite often;)

20.01.2015 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It does not take an hour http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32036?
If double: it is necessary to replace :)

20.01.2015 18:14, Alexander Belousov:

What a handsome man !!!

20.01.2015 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Laelia coenosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.01.2015 15:53, Irina Nikulina:

Laelia coenosa
On http://www.kolumbus.fi/~kr5298/lnel/lym/laecoeno.htm DV presented subspecies Laelia coenosa sangaica Moore, 1877
http://www.jpmoth.org/Lymantriidae/Laelia_coenosa_sangaica.html

20.01.2015 15:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

)))

20.01.2015 14:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.01.2015 10:56, Peter Khramov:

Often he promised to appear somewhere in the thread this week as the times.

20.01.2015 10:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And Stas happens here?

20.01.2015 9:40, Ozgur Kocak:

Scopula marginepunctata? *

20.01.2015 9:39, Ozgur Kocak:

Scopula marginepunctata? *

20.01.2015 9:37, Ozgur Kocak:

It was described as Zygaena punctum malatina *

20.01.2015 9:34, Ozgur Kocak:

Tegostoma lepidalis...
The discussion in lepiforum...
http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=97034 *

20.01.2015 7:57, Alexander Belousov:

Stanislav (Korb), according to the point of fishing is your described subspecies of platooni . If it is true, it makes it to the list of subspecies Libythea celtis .

19.01.2015 23:06, Peter Khramov:

And this, too. But she was not the only one.

19.01.2015 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

19.01.2015 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

19.01.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Symbrenthia hypatia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.01.2015 20:01, Alex Dumchus:

OK. SchA hooked. And that, of course, gone somewhere. I could not find. So much more than 2 years have passed. But revised bags with Malaysia and Java, set to razmochku another five similar. By the weekend lay.

19.01.2015 19:44, Alexander Belousov:

Peter, it seems, we are referring to the same book (Les papillons du Monde. Alain Eid, Michel Viar ). Here's looking at those pictures, I decided to try the black.

19.01.2015 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, do not have to clean. Just the top of the trailer from it all.

19.01.2015 19:15, Peter Khramov:

Firstly, I must say that, according to - Alexander, you have a pleasant and teachings foty and copies osbenno compared to that with which we here often have to deal with.
Now on the little things:
For me, as you move from the output from black to dark gray.But it is at the level of subjective Plus monitors all configured differently, so that the story is not there some kind of a guide to action, and so the view from the gallery. On occasion, pay attention, maybe something really wrong.
Svetlana, yes, black background allows even a shadow mask too.But first of all, I think it
A) Aesthetics (especially when it is necessary to emphasize the color that butterflies and other similar krasavtsiv very important).B) Lack gimor reflexes with color and white balance (especially when it is necessary to editing the main object is not affected or influenced neznachetlno background without masking this very background).
Willing to Alexander Belousov and about wear.I was guided by the galleries where not removed, biologists, photographers and, accordingly, they have no problems with the A1, and if there is, they simply squeeze the most out of the available.
As for the aesthetics and of showing sites.
Alexander (Dumchus) blindly rely on scientific sites not (all) scientific aspects are often not worth it.For example, in our subject throughout the network I do not know a single site with a decent service. Well, except ours, although it still has room to grow. With photos in scientific sites situation, maybe not such a breath-taking, but still not ideal.Do not argue, an example with black background I took from photographic albums, not from scientific but for the interference of science I do not see these pictures, but in fact even the other way around. Bo aesthetics there some aesthetics. It's just technically well-taken photos, which truncated referred to as necessary.Actually, on our website, and it would be interesting to combine scientific literacy / accuracy with a decent modern online service and aesthetically appealing illustrations.
ZY With regard to what others look - and then, to learn from the mistakes of others, rather than on its own.
Zzy Regarding the gray background - he is no. This is his plus and minus its same.I believe that for most of the photos is a minus. But back to the quality of the pictures on the site as a whole, the background color - is almost the last thing they should be changed so that they become better. As gritstsa, all have such problems: -)

19.01.2015 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

Probably different. Watch at your leisure. So far, the picture is clean.

19.01.2015 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He returned as it was. So I think it will be better :)

19.01.2015 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Symbrenthia hypatia / Alexandr Zhakov Symbrenthia hypselis / Lev Bely.

19.01.2015 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

19.01.2015 18:18, Peter Khramov:

Dim, if you're talking about a site, the planned otkrytochelyustnye all insects.
Basil, if you will pass, let's meet with you, I'll give you bucks for Dima.

19.01.2015 18:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Indeed, various butterflies, and I should not have moved, it is not the top of the 38581 and Valid Symbrenthia hypselis. Alexander explained. :))

19.01.2015 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside is defined correctly, but it's not my underside with butterflies Photo # 14008. Completely different form of spurs on the hind wings near the top and underside. Alexander hour you are not confused when shooting and photos can be uploaded to another instance? Or I'm wrong?

19.01.2015 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

View photos transferred on the basis of Basil, is one type. :))
And here at all prkrasno seen: http://motyli.wz.cz/nymphal/symbrenthia.htm

19.01.2015 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Symbrenthia hypselis / Lev Bely Symbrenthia hypatia / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.01.2015 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Symbrenthia hypatia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.01.2015 17:40, Irina Nikulina:

And in my opinion, the most comfortable for the perception - medium or light gray. And it does not merge with the dark objects, and does not interfere with the brightness, in general - is optimal) Approximately how here http://omflies.narod.ru/tortricidae.htm But it's all very individual. As in the joke - «For whom how ..":) The main thing is that the photo copies straightened Alexander bezuprechnye- is always nice!
While distracted and hung page, Sasha about the same, and said))

19.01.2015 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not know esterika - very good when it does not interfere with scientific. But here everything is fine - and raspravka and quality, and the background. And why for someone to watch themselves need to do so that the others looked. :)))

19.01.2015 17:18, Alex Dumchus:

"Prof zabugortsy often black mold." Peter. Prompt least one scientific (or pseudoscientific) zabugorny butterflies site where mold on black. Sam did some photos on black, beautiful, do not argue, but ... how could we claim to be scientific, and here aesthetics solid ...

19.01.2015 17:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Handed a treaty. And Palin I know the other side of town from me (on Pioneer dwell) :)
A living stick and I overlooked some Malay :)

19.01.2015 16:43, Alexander Belousov:

But there are drawbacks. When shooting broken whiteflies on black, all gray and frayed become visible. Therefore, suitable only A1.

19.01.2015 16:15, Svetlana Shchavelina:

:) Black background is often used to not bother with shadows from the flash. Usually it takes a piece of black velvet, it extinguishes all the shadows, very comfortable.

" I think so, too, is not bad. " is not just "not bad" and absolutely wonderful!

19.01.2015 16:15, Alexander Belousov:

Shot on black, but had to reduce the processing density to dark gray. He has such a dense black that blends perfectly.
I think so, too, is not bad.

19.01.2015 16:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stick insects also are planned?

19.01.2015 16:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! My sister you can tell? (She lives in peacock - I think you know where it is)

19.01.2015 15:57, Peter Khramov:

If on a black background with no merge, it will be even better. Prof. zabugortsy often black mold.

19.01.2015 15:43, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Beauty! Lord, take note of how advantageous looks instance on a gray background :)

19.01.2015 13:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ourapteryx incaudata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.01.2015 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I disassemble them think :) Alexander, at the underside of your so approx. it should be.

19.01.2015 13:05, Irina Nikulina:

Ourapteryx incaudata http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/02_Ennominae/017_Ourapteryx/Ourapteryx%20incaudata/Ourapteryx%20incaudata.htm Among the many species, it is one such - without tails and virtually parallel bands on the VC.

19.01.2015 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She torments her (confirmation necessary). Members of the genus have approximately the same top, but the underside are all different and very complicated. They should definitely spread from underside. Why yesterday and recalled: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/14008 :)

19.01.2015 8:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I will not be superfluous :)
With the same point as the first. Only the smaller scale of a millimeter.

19.01.2015 8:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syntypistis comatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.01.2015 8:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determination of Oleg Gorbunov.

19.01.2015 8:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Theretra pallicosta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.01.2015 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tanaecia pelea?

18.01.2015 23:01, Irina Nikulina:

Syntypistis comatus? Let me explain the question. On some sites Asian species is called Quadricalcarifera viridimacula (for example, here http://gaga.biodiv.tw/9507bx/776.htm) On our site and in the gallery hohlatok P.Morozova the topic Notodontidae http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=184446&view=findpost&p=565100 Quadricalcarifera viridimacula is given as a synonym for Syntypistis comatus . Confuses that jpmoth.org are just two species - and Syntipistis viridimaculata http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/01_NOTODONTIDAE/05_Dicranurinae/13_Syntypistis/Syntypistis%20viridimaculata/Syntypistis%20viridimaculata.htm and Syntypistis comatus http: //www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/01_NOTODONTIDAE/05_Dicranurinae/13_Syntypistis/Syntypistis%20comatus/Syntypistis_comatus.htm. And both in Taxonomy = Quadricalcarifera viridimacula Matsumura, 1922 We Syntipistis viridimaculata do not, boldsystems too.

18.01.2015 20:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I remind you about the underside :) There are two types of such formed. And underside can be very handy.

18.01.2015 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.01.2015 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another found: "Butterflies of Peninsular Malaysia"
http://malaysiabutterflies.myspecies.info/
Very handy, I feel :)

18.01.2015 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glyphodes caesalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.01.2015 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually: Now Golubets one trying to explain well, and stumbled: "Tropical Lycaenidae"
http://www.lycaenidae.gmxhome.de/
It was not in my piggy bank yet.

18.01.2015 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tiracola aureata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.01.2015 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tiracola aureata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.01.2015 12:22, Irina Nikulina:

Here, too,Tiracola aureata, I dumyu, though not so clearly pronounced golden-red hue, as in the photo 33804. But the sight of such a volatile and pale copies more often shown in the photo on the network, such as https: // www .flickr.com / photos / itchydogimages / 16089771521 / in / pool-mothgallery Rlagiata same gray-brown, uniformly colored, submarginal band is not as yellow as those aurata. For comparison - http://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/244135-Tiracola-plagiata, http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3609Tiracola/3609.1Tiracola_plagiata/Tiracola%20plagiata.htm

18.01.2015 12:17, Irina Nikulina:

Tiracola aureata http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/05_NOCTUIDAE/13_NOCTUINAE/083_Tiracola/Tiracola%20aureata/Tiracola%20aureata.htm It differs from similar species plagiata is so golden-brown-tinged Koricheva VC and trunk and distinctly golden yellow submarginal bands.

18.01.2015 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perigrapha hoenei / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.01.2015 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate. It is necessary to Dmitry looked.

18.01.2015 1:57, Irina Nikulina:

Glyphodes caesalis
http://www.nbair.res.in/insectpests/Glyphodes-caesalis.php
Very harmful thing, the main enemy of Artocarpus heterophyllus (Indian breadfruit and jackfruit), that's what they do caterpillars http://www.pcaarrd.dost.gov.ph/home/ssentinel/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1824%3Anatural-enemies-control-jackfruit-fruit-borer&Itemid=41

18.01.2015 1:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhimphalea astrigalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.01.2015 1:17, Irina Nikulina:

Rhimphalea astrigalis
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/50_PYRALOIDEA/Crambidae/63.9_Pyraustinae/Rhimphalea/Rhimphalea%20astrigalis/Rhimphalea%20astrigalis.htm

18.01.2015 0:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pomasia salutaris / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.01.2015 0:41, Irina Nikulina:

Pomasia salutarisThis is, in my opinion, the third already lost)

18.01.2015 0:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first representative of the kind of site. A race consists of three kinds. I did not miss with a view :)
The only thing that could mess with subspecies .... But it seems it was not for the peninsula. It is necessary to Dmitry looked.

18.01.2015 0:11, Irina Nikulina:

Perigrapha hoenei

17.01.2015 22:01, Peter Khramov:

And that joke, everything Insectoids will not only beetles to butterflies ...

17.01.2015 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Plebejus subsolanus / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.01.2015 18:23, Fyodor Pudovikov:

I, too, for the argus.

17.01.2015 18:22, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2015 18:22, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2015 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, grasshoppers, too (just kidding). Look what zhivotinka fun. Kind of I do not know the truth ...

Right miracle Yudo some :)

17.01.2015 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now soak put a lot of anyone. Mustilia / Mustilizans, Ericeia etc. The material is interesting, in short. It is necessary to put :)

17.01.2015 17:16, Peter Khramov:

I nachset that will need to be spread not only butterflies, but beetles that look. With regards to mentoring, I think you need at least a few zhuchistam here will get together and sort out between themselves who what and how.

17.01.2015 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Volatile them.

17.01.2015 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypopyra lactipex / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.01.2015 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypopyra lactipex / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.01.2015 17:13, Peter Khramov:

My favorite gem about automatic translation still about a year since 2000 (and from English, not Japanese) - "in a dead end dead end dead end dead end."
And in the case - automatic translation will be the default option (and possibly only a single push of a button, rather than immediately) for the commentary, for which there is no language.If the manual option is available - know the problem.
ZY And the language, by the way, it is planned two. A little more.

17.01.2015 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hefty beast. Hypopyra lactipex? Just afraid to put the mind.

17.01.2015 16:18, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, about the translation did not answer at photo # 35246
, There is so overloaded) This is me about the "madness of the brave ..." :)) When to deal with the peculiarities of the Far East blues, I shoveled a lot of material from the Japanese sites.When trying to understand the differences of three closely related species, it has received the following from Google (smile!): «♂ Male How about a significant difference in the three well. When a woman ♀ shows only that kind of time or growls at the touch.Shoot husband bright people Asama ♂ men, and I want to fish at the beginning of the shooting spread this bright light blue part.
The length from the edge of Silver-studded blue hair, but I have learned in the past year on the blog pensioners, and can be recognized by local, it becomes Hime.However, it is also becoming shorter Enke old individuals ":)) Here and are determined ..:))) Highly amused snarling "touch" a woman and "blog pensioners" :))) If not for your once the Council is automatically translated into English first, and then you ... would never have realized that it talking about the past (recent) records :) So imagine how it will move on when an automatic translation ..Although, of course, is an extreme case of Japanese- Well this post soon ... so for relaxation :), since the humor in this section is also permitted;)

17.01.2015 16:12, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Sasha, then that's what I realized when mothsofborneo back :) - Suriga suriga Schaus sensu Holloway, 1976, but is already too late to withdraw the question)

17.01.2015 16:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Full title
Ambadra montana Holloway, 1982 = Suriga suriga.
The site = sign has many options, that is, It is not necessarily synonymous with, most likely under this name to describe the type. :))

17.01.2015 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ambadra suriga / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.01.2015 15:26, Irina Nikulina:

I think that is usual for BorneoAmbadra suriga http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/01_NOTODONTIDAE/03_Ceirinae/07_Ambadra/Ambadra%20suriga/Ambadra%20suriga.htm
However, there is Mountain View Ambadra montana , often found at altitudes of 1500-1800 m, but the description is, in my opinion, lies less. I did not find him anywhere, except on mothsofborneo (the Museum Witt also only suriga) looked now online - as a synonym for montana is Suriga suriga -?

17.01.2015 14:23, Irina Nikulina:

InsteadPlebejus argus? Krylova drawing, of course, volatile, yet with a clear boundary zones of the dark ... has caused doubts. LW subsolanusov these are not met. http://www.exblog.jp/blog_logo.asp?slt=1&imgsrc=201108/11/69/a0146869_76346.jpg

17.01.2015 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achlya flavicornis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.01.2015 9:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blasticorhinus ussuriensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.01.2015 9:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Inaccurate, because there is Blasticorhinus unduligera, but its image is only at Kononenko are similar, but it turns out that Blasticorhinus ussuriensis. :)

17.01.2015 9:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Blasticorhinus ussuriensis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.01.2015 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthomantis cornelia.

17.01.2015 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow.

16.01.2015 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Satyrus ferula / Confidently identified / Male / .

16.01.2015 21:49, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Satyrus ferula male

16.01.2015 20:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nicholas, why do not put the definition? It would have been more correct. :)

16.01.2015 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Minois dryas / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

16.01.2015 20:31, Irina Nikulina:

Minois dryasmale

16.01.2015 19:42, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2015 19:42, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2015 19:42, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2015 19:41, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2015 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, as if about curating beetles. I'm all for the hands! In the above privacy of Cerambycinae, Lamiinae :) This is my :)

16.01.2015 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dim, which is about a thousand just give myself. :)
Petr bodies. a perturbation. And cross :)

16.01.2015 16:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I do not understand about 500-1000 ekz- does it mean?
In Moscow, it was 10 days ago. I will be in March, but passing through. View photos of Veysa- be there this background and photos can be ootuda

16.01.2015 16:17, Peter Khramov:

Basil, beetles that look, too, are relevant for the site will be, yeah -))
Dmitry, a similar pattern seen among different users and the web, too. You're in the capital not going to happen? Or crises circle?

16.01.2015 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 15:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cupido argiades / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitri really is somewhere between 500 to a thousand copies. ?

16.01.2015 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthia togata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 12:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Blue background where I've seen this. Not Weiss whether in books? Although I could be wrong.
Basil - Th something.

16.01.2015 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ecpyrrhorrhoe rubiginalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.01.2015 11:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Small announcement :) That's all (except bugs) will eventually be on the site. Genital species there think minimum (except Eupterote sp., Etc.). And with the definition too, I think can handle themselves. Season never ends :) It's just I do not want to spread sd difficult moment. But for simple had to go ....... Even Trogonoptera took :)

P.S.Dmitri, about genital types. I'll give it actually is. I have it somehow to anything, but to establish the truth, I think is useful :) Only now the question is how to convey?

16.01.2015 10:10, Peter Khramov:

Why do you think that it's not his photo?

16.01.2015 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No problem, Dimitri. And by itself of no return out of the question. The main thing is now only as a pass :)

16.01.2015 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saliocleta widagdoi / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.01.2015 8:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Regarding plagiata- see photos Shaposhnikov. Where are they ???

16.01.2015 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Printout, to cook, but forever)))

16.01.2015 0:32, Irina Nikulina:

Saliocleta sp. Revised many assumeSaliocleta widagdoi, I met with a similar theme in Borneo P. Morozov «Notodontidae»
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=184446&view=findpost&p=1306388

15.01.2015 23:29, Irina Nikulina:

Sash, almost for the first time did not even looked at boldsystems, these Asian sites somehow amicably convinced, moreover, that used to trust jpmoth) But in general as something not very superficially in Nacoleia fit .. We must try to understand

15.01.2015 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

There's a different butterfly http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=282907
Variegated 3 Asian sites, possibly determined by www.jpmoth.org, where the truth? :)

15.01.2015 22:57, Peter Khramov:

Under Alexander plagiarism meant a determination on another site.
For cases where the determination of the author are not zaregan us, to make a separate checkbox. I already wrote about it.In the meantime, the author of the definition - the one who has brought the Old on the definition of the site (if the photographer did not initially request for determination on the resource side) or photographs (if he did request).
With regard to whether or not to write, which is defined (such as molbiol and co) - is questionable.

15.01.2015 22:47, Irina Nikulina:

Nacoleia insolitalis, I think
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/50_PYRALOIDEA/Crambidae/63.9_Pyraustinae/Nacoleia/Nacoleia%20insolitalis/Nacoleia%20insolitalis.htm

15.01.2015 22:45, Irina Nikulina:

Eoophyla sp. See. Comment on the photo # 30242

15.01.2015 22:44, Irina Nikulina:

Eoophyla sp. If you discuss at "very similar" to the jpmoth.org it is very similar to the uncertain under Eoophyla sp3
http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/50_PYRALOIDEA/Crambidae/63.6_Acentropinae/framepage_Acentropinae.html And perhaps that's similar to that of Borneo - Eoophyla boernickei http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=282911
Prior to the form, I think it will not work, but can be illustrated by race.

15.01.2015 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pomasia salutaris / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.01.2015 22:39, Irina Nikulina:

Pomasia salutaris http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/09_Larentiinae/15_Pomasia/Pomasia%20salutaris/Pomasia%20salutaris.htm

15.01.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Charaxes paphianus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Charaxes anticlea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Charaxes anticlea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium megaera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium megaera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium sarpedon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium sarpedon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio zagreus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio zagreus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.01.2015 21:36, Alex Dumchus:

Charaxes paphianus

15.01.2015 21:35, Alex Dumchus:

Charaxes anticlea

15.01.2015 21:34, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium megaera

15.01.2015 21:31, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium sarpedon

15.01.2015 21:29, Alex Dumchus:

It Papilio zagreus. Apparently I forgot to put down in the computation

15.01.2015 18:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, welded? This is simply wrong. I'm "zhuchist" so cooking scales to me once, "violet". Therefore I propose a completely free material to establish the truth. :)

15.01.2015 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You could as you say Alexander, of course. But unfortunately there are still people who are not clear on the reasons do not want to name them all figured on this website (it is known to me and let me remain). Uhh just tired today: I traveled the material again in Southeast Asia (the material will now be simple: sailboats and Nymphalidae mostly).So that the proceeds will be :) As for plagiarism as such: it on a normal share should not be.

15.01.2015 17:32, Peter Khramov:

A INTO it?

15.01.2015 12:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Boil

15.01.2015 12:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Korb in Colias he thoroughly understands. It puts everything in place. :)
Also neighing)))

15.01.2015 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander is now the curator of this group in Korb Colias he thoroughly understands. It puts everything in place. :)

15.01.2015 12:04, Alexander Belousov:

Please help me with Colias poliographus Motschulsky, 1860. The site is listed as a subspecies Colias erate, but the Internet often referred to as a separate species. If you look, maybe it's worth to add?

15.01.2015 10:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Helicoverpa armigera / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.01.2015 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.01.2015 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, thank you.
How to obtain the consent of the author to define at what the realties Polish, Bosnian or German site? I think if defined on the site, and not personal, it is public information and can be safely indicate the author without his consent, with an indication of where the resource definition.
And in your opinion, what to do with plagiarism?

15.01.2015 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thanks for the correction.
Dmitry, your thoughts? And because spolzёt into oblivion again :)

15.01.2015 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As for the types that are defined in the third-party resources offer easy to make look this way: "The definition of the form: Name (not registered)" and provide the opportunity to inscribe it on the hands of the moderators if there is in fact base (with the consent of the author's definition of itself).

15.01.2015 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I finish correcting geography.
His view on why I'm doing it stated in the commentary to the photo number 21211
Let the Finland site is Suomi, Thailand - Thai, Japan - Nippon Coke, etc. I just wanted to bring in a human-readable version of all :)

14.01.2015 22:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

I propose to continue the discussion of the geography in the system area.

14.01.2015 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

As I understood for the future:
1. Determination of the author of photos, everything is clear
2. Photo by the author specifies a different definition, a moderator puts the authorship of the registered party is not registered in the comments of the author. Photo by the author definition is the author of a photo.
3. Determines registered participant also no questions.
4.Photo by putting photos on another resource defined by another person as your definition? Moderator should indicate this in comments, If it is determined that registered on the site to put down his authorship, if not? see in bold?
5.Photo is determined to other resources without the participation of the author's photo (failover puts the moderator or other registered user), or as an example of the definition of Pavel Morozov.Moderator in determining who first puts the name indicates a link to the resource "which determined who defined" again if the author is not registered. Until Perth enters "tagging Nezareganny user".:)))
By changing geography, one can only repeat to correct grammatical errors and spelling is desirable, at the request of the author. If there is no automatic selection of countries in the catalog. then do not touch it or anything like copyrights labels.
Basil, personally beg you do not have to touch the author's geography.We've got lots of photos without any geography and everything is fine, but here you do not like and starts redrawing the information from him. This is very dangerous.

14.01.2015 14:02, Peter Khramov:

The author does not see that he is entitled to. The author seems to be that he should enter under the rules of the site. But it is not. Should fit people who brought this information and not in the comments of the author, respectively, and in the comments to the photos below. As I made yesterday about a number of pictures.

14.01.2015 13:59, Peter Khramov:

Basil, we just have not once discussed topic about the removal of photons and about a replacement image. I propose to share these concepts, otherwise there is a mess, you know? Well, that is the phrase "This is a double photo # 38351, must be replaced by" to be more correct, but for the ph Zoran'a, which was recently uploaded a lot of photons are exactly the same, it's just a true "remove".So everyone understands the excess is removed, and the people will not be confused when we foty removed, and when combined with each other.
So this time I update as often as possible and in the public domain.

14.01.2015 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nobody disputes. The task of the moderator in this case lead to the geography of the most readable (if possible) species. For example: if it is written in the geography भारत - it means it is necessary to translate and write that it is actually important to know India :) addition propagation mode is also where a particular specimen.A website two languages, as rightly noted Dmitry.

14.01.2015 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Tug of War" turns interesting :))))

14.01.2015 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15708 group.

14.01.2015 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15689 group.

14.01.2015 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15703 group.

14.01.2015 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A bit wrong you understand me at first, I think :)
Authors have the right to write in the comments to the photos that they want the benefit is called the "Comment author" - IMHO private. And if he was asked to add to something: the author has the right to decide for himself if he is to write or not. No one insists on it.Or alternatively make it possible to independently enter moderators specify if it does not zaregan site. Of course, if a person has given consent. In the particular case (because of which all the "fuss") consent from Paul I received.

14.01.2015 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have no way to replace the photo in another LC. So if you see a double - I write delete As is customary on the site. Oh and as further is not for me to decide. What's wrong?

14.01.2015 8:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

While I can not say (((We wait

13.01.2015 23:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Maniola jurtina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.01.2015 23:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pleuroptya ruralis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.01.2015 23:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrium pruni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.01.2015 22:26, Irina Nikulina:

Satyrium pruni

13.01.2015 22:25, Irina Nikulina:

Pleuroptya ruralis

13.01.2015 22:24, Irina Nikulina:

Maniola jurtina

13.01.2015 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Do not delete, and update the image for this image. Updated.

13.01.2015 22:15, Peter Khramov:

The image is updated.

13.01.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

The image is updated.

13.01.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

The image is updated.

13.01.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

The image is updated.

13.01.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

The image is updated.

13.01.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

The image is updated.

13.01.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

The image is updated.

13.01.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

The image is updated.

13.01.2015 22:04, Peter Khramov:

The names in the geography of international and should be clear to all
Must. To the extent that the universal for the whole site (for example, in formal characteristics). A part that users write in free form - should not. A person has a right to enter geography, for example, in Spanish, if he knows no other.

13.01.2015 21:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Svetlana Shchavelina Alexandr Zhakov.

13.01.2015 21:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Petr Khramov Alexandr Zhakov.

13.01.2015 21:58, Peter Khramov:

Determination - Pavel Morozov.

13.01.2015 21:58, Peter Khramov:

Determination - Pavel Morozov.

13.01.2015 21:55, Peter Khramov:

Determine put whoever privnёs information on determining the site (yet the column "unregistered user"). Comment photos of the author only used for its intended purpose. What Paul has defined - it is not the author's comments picture, and, again, the person who privnёs this information on the site. Ie Alexander Zhakova.Here it is, and it must be put down.

13.01.2015 21:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Petr Khramov Alexandr Zhakov.

13.01.2015 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Authors should not write anything in the comments to fote if the initiators of the case they are not. Ie Paul is not just determined by their tip, and the comments have to be from other users. And Peter Temples there should not be displayed.For the future, to make a mark "Nezareganny user" and is set determine who privnёs definition information to the site.

13.01.2015 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, check your emails.

13.01.2015 18:24, Peter Khramov:

Register does not want to because it means coaching. A Curation would mean redrawing the entire modern twist on taxonomy proposed Shintelmeysterom.
Explain why it is coaching. And about redrawing general idea is not finished - it would mean, what next? .. Nipon.

13.01.2015 17:31, Irina Nikulina:

No, it's another kind - Synegia . Reviewed all available by the nature and description, too, stopped atSynegia camptogrammariahttp://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=96913 were doubts about these relatives on mothsofborneo obscura and imitaria . But obscura feature of - irregularly shaped orange-gray ring in the submarginal area VC between M1 and M3. There is no such.And the imitaria the spot between the bands are more pronounced and more orange than the other two species. Wingspan from camptogramma is just the same as indicated by the author. Obscura and imitaria a little bit smaller. So it is here, this conclusion may be, Dmitri knows better than this generation?

13.01.2015 16:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, to clarify the situation.

13.01.2015 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:)

13.01.2015 15:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 15:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Author's comment. Self-Chinese and Chinese character. The theme of the Tae- Thailand

13.01.2015 15:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By definition, no questions asked Irene.
As for the rest: you just have to authors wrote: "The definition of the form: Pavel Morozov (molbiol.ru)" I agree with this goal.

13.01.2015 15:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

By definition, Irene, no one questions arise. :)
Copyright definition, when the author is identified in what the resource is and the author points out. If it is determined without the participation of the author, the two options, one is to set 1 and displayed is determined by Petr Khramov.The second author of a moderator who endures to the form, indicating the author's comments and resource definition.
Basil, I will remind constantly about common errors that would always remember them and never will forget them again and prevent and do not ask me to do it. :))

13.01.2015 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The names in the geography of international and should be clear to everyone, and not local self-names or abbreviations. If the site is an international, of course. Not a single serious website never seen in geography was spelled "Thai" and all. Everywhere it is written "Thailand".

13.01.2015 15:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

There gramoticheskie errors in the title, then it is necessary to correct, if not, what is the author's version. I agree with Peter. This is only the beginning, and that a voluntary, now it is possible to rewrite the geography half.

13.01.2015 15:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

People actually got a response from Pasha Morozov.
In short:
He does not want to register because it means coaching. A Curation would mean redrawing the entire modern twist on taxonomy proposed Shintelmeysterom.
It was proposed.I quote:
"Vasya, maybe just to correct those who work there permanently and refer to the fact that defined Pavel Morozov with Molbiola or something"
I realized that it is enough that the authors have indicated it in their comments and propose to put all the author's definition. How to look at that option?

13.01.2015 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The working languages ​​of the site-Russian and English. And if in Hebrew, or Thai geography will begin to write? I think Basil properly corrected

13.01.2015 14:51, Peter Khramov:

The solution is: the author's indication leave unchanged (all the more so there than the country can be a lot of things). But we will formalize privyazkku photos to zoogeo zones and countries (as well as species). And there will be a selection from the list.The result will be formalized, standardized data on the country (English plus Russian) and the Geography of the author's line, where he writes as it sees fit.

13.01.2015 14:41, Peter Khramov:

Confirming Pavel Morozov.

13.01.2015 14:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The self-titled and will Pratet Thai letters ประเทศไทย
Incidentally Cambodia on Khmer will Kamputiya (as in Soviet times was called)

13.01.2015 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, why did you decide that Thailand is more correct than that?
Here Despite which side to look. Suomi is a self, Finland, this is Russian. Thai it self, Thailand - this is the English language, Thailand - is Russian.

13.01.2015 13:34, Andrey Ponomarev:

Corydalis I'm not special, so I trust Paul.
And I still do not know how to distinguish from furkuly bifida.

13.01.2015 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It has long been worth it to put in order. Still, the full name of the state is more appropriate to the site :)

13.01.2015 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.01.2015 10:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dudusa synopla Dudusa distincta.

13.01.2015 10:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Furcula furcula / Andrey Ponomarev Furcula bifida / Petr Khramov.

13.01.2015 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Has already :)

13.01.2015 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dudusa distincta not in the catalog.

13.01.2015 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

13.01.2015 10:05, Vladimir Bobow:

I found in the dried form, on the windowsill, in an abandoned building. Alive is not met.

13.01.2015 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Put 1 Paul is not registered. :)

13.01.2015 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ginshachia gemmifera / Luvjoy Choker Ginshachia bronacha / Petr Khramov.

13.01.2015 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ginshachia gemmifera / Luvjoy Choker Ginshachia bronacha / Petr Khramov.

13.01.2015 9:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ginshachia gemmifera / Luvjoy Choker Ginshachia bronacha / Petr Khramov.

13.01.2015 5:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23595 put Irina definition based on the time difference between fasting Irina caption (23:25), and the final verdict is not Molbiol P. Morozova (23:35).
I wrote it, to avoid any unnecessary questions why it did.

13.01.2015 5:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalera torpida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.01.2015 5:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalera torpida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.01.2015 5:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalera torpida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.01.2015 5:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I sent a letter to the PM through a Pavel Morozov molbiole asking zaregatsya. And there it is :)
It should be the same to determine the right to exhibit.

13.01.2015 1:56, Peter Khramov:

He did not zaregan site.

13.01.2015 1:30, Svetlana Shchavelina:

He gave the exact place (the answer for the question Pavel Morozov Molbiole)

12.01.2015 23:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We transfer based on the determination of Pavel Morozov, or wait until he otpishet here (in the authors do not see him)?

12.01.2015 23:25, Irina Nikulina:

I wrote that there is doubt, and looked between torpida banksii. On molbiole seen discussion. I read all the descriptions, stopped at torpida

12.01.2015 23:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew Paul Frost on mobiole says itFurcula bifida, I do not associate with Furcula from photographs. Your opinion again?

12.01.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, come on: what could be there. Just for all the sins of the deep. And if we begin to resemble each other constantly about it then nothing good will come. Therefore, it is necessary to stop :)
But if Pavel Morozov said in Corydalis its opinion is taken into account, of course :)

12.01.2015 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I looked down and Charcot foot from side to side. :)
I mean that when serious person comes to your site, then he opened his eyes wide.
But we have much better common efforts. :)

12.01.2015 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Paul Frost offers torpida or banksii on http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235476&pid=1526763&st=350&#entry1526763

12.01.2015 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good for you, Alexander, Thank you :) recalled a long time is taken into account.

12.01.2015 22:57, Irina Nikulina:

ThisPhalera torpida, most likely. Now try to see more detail description, there is some doubt

12.01.2015 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

A good illustration of the definition of "is very similar, it seems"
and the hasty transfer. :)

12.01.2015 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

12.01.2015 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

12.01.2015 22:32, Peter Khramov:

Excellent!

12.01.2015 22:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Phalera ora / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

12.01.2015 22:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Phalera ora / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

12.01.2015 22:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Phalera ora / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

12.01.2015 21:41, Peter Khramov:

Basil, thanks for the link. Clearly, the translator will sooner or later all the information that he needs. It just takes time. Well, because while we often underestimate accepted, then I translate into numbers: normal manual translation discussion post will cost from 400 to 800 re.Irina, if you're talking about translation from the Japanese, yes - the madness of the brave we sing glory!
On the insects have to switch to automatic translation, will not get to ...

12.01.2015 21:32, Peter Khramov:

Another update. Zygaenidae is now in charge of Constantine Efetov.

12.01.2015 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He has a wingspan.

12.01.2015 20:58, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily size -? .. Such right words to write it)

12.01.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's what exists for translations of such texts: http: //www.vokabula.rf/slovari/arrabs/
I think there are answers to many questions :)

12.01.2015 18:44, Alex Dumchus:

Between 21 hours and 19-30

12.01.2015 18:16, Irina Nikulina:

Leo, I think, would do it gracefully, as always), Peter, how about convert description to 16-17 species and at the same time to the whole race? :) Also shoot? :)) Google gives takooooe ... :) Forgive me for verbosity, do not like to even a shadow of doubt remained)

12.01.2015 18:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyana perornata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.01.2015 18:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyana perornata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.01.2015 17:59, Peter Khramov:

At full speed transfer system ph give birth to supraspecific taxa. Soon it will be possible to carry Chalcosia or even just to Zygaenidae.

12.01.2015 17:58, Peter Khramov:

If today was a manual translation of comments Site in English, the translator would just shot himself. The inaccurate? Or accurate?

12.01.2015 17:56, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, let me into your phone Press. You are now free? Or write in the mail when it is more convenient.

12.01.2015 17:42, Irina Nikulina:

Still I think it's kind ofCyana perornata, - noted that it is in the region's largest, with such wingspan. All the other smaller or significantly smaller.If we understand in detail what is stable in the figure of the wings, and that varies, just in the photo have all the defining stably present for the kind of signs (in VC) - just straight red sling (often trimmed with black), marginal red sash with zigzag internal Abroad (raznovelikie teeth!), Short red strip at an angle to the Coast near the apex and one oval black discal spot in the male (the female is round). And the only species with a disk. spot in the male a few, but all the others do not fit the size and pattern.In addition, the more important point - in the description of types of detail the size and shape of the spots on the underside of androconial VC (it is all different), and here it is fully consistent with perornata. Sasha, and as for the question, they just, I think, deal with varying symptoms - 1. pink wings meet, seen onto some. photo on boldsystems.org 2.Black can be framed as the two median band, and no. It can be seen on boldsystems, and jpmoth. And, often black rim at the outer sling thinner and interrupted in the middle here, and this can be clearly seen even on photo Dmitry # 29951. 3. The length of the near-edge red sling varies, judging by those at the site copies.Perhaps, and this, too, is long. These are detailed considerations. (And the request to add size, by the way, was there not in vain))

12.01.2015 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil quickly created. :)

12.01.2015 17:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Episparis monochroma / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.01.2015 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yponomeuta plumbella / Alexandr Zhakov Yponomeuta irrorella / Zoran Bozovic.

12.01.2015 17:24, Irina Nikulina:

Kind, I understand, after I made the comment :) It was not, I do not exactly bugs :)

12.01.2015 17:16, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander, I'm just kind of re-illustrated) after replacement.

12.01.2015 16:58, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. Just I went to the page view. Where that changed ??? Old Fota Island rnulas, while 2 hours ago, it was not. Glitches ...

12.01.2015 16:51, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander. Here USD went up the hill, so that soon all will only Polixenes and the rest of the domestic shoot! We all flights from Rostov to the tropics was canceled, he was one of Vietnam, who grew up in such a way that for the money I had flown to Mexico for two weeks. So all in front of: (((

12.01.2015 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

17 species in the genus, there are very similar, it is necessary to dig deeper. :))

12.01.2015 16:28, Irina Nikulina:

Frankly, Sash - there is also plenty walked)) Year almost back periodically. Today's inspirations :)) With "penitsilariyami" finished)

12.01.2015 16:23, Irina Nikulina:

And this is not Penicillaria. Rhode Episparis. Correspond to the description of the formEpisparis monochromaBut the site in this genus lacks 5-6 kinds, including and monochroma

12.01.2015 16:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm all for it Pyralinae kept :))

12.01.2015 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Claterna cydonia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.01.2015 15:58, Irina Nikulina:

Comment author long gone aside :) It's not kind of Penicillaria, andClaterna cydonia

12.01.2015 15:46, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander, most of all I had in mind the need to specify the size in the case of productions in vague - to facilitate the task of those who will determine.In addition, the disputed may be theoretically any case) Written puts a precise definition, and it can not be true, especially in the case of just such difficult genera (already happened many times), and then what - specifically ask for ext. data? Long and uncomfortable - the author responds sometimes not immediately.And the dimensions shown even if the precise formulations, can help in the future to other authors. I do not really understand what the difficulty when photographing specimens. directly measure the scope and specify. (While I was writing, Alexander had already written a shorter :)))

12.01.2015 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, you're cunning :) something Polixena and Podalirius in your photo noticed. Basically the tropics and most unique in my opinion. So do not be lazy :)) unique information on many species. But Peter does not allow the line to insert :))

12.01.2015 15:19, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, so all right. So it should be. New photo (32044) is removed completely, and the changing image of the old with the new. Where glitches something? Everything is fine, it is necessary to do exactly the same with the others.

12.01.2015 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ochlodes sylvanus / Pavel Ivanov Thymelicus lineola / Eugene Karolinskiy.

12.01.2015 13:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

... or P. icarus .

12.01.2015 13:33, Alex Dumchus:

I have a second same (1-2 mm larger) size. And about Dimensioning, according to Irina, see sense affix them in case of dispute, for example, what is the point I put down sizes or have Polixena Podalirius ???

12.01.2015 13:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Th. lineola

12.01.2015 13:26, Alex Dumchus:

I tried to replace. It turned out incorrect. Remove the main picture of the page. I do not want to experiment, not mine!

12.01.2015 12:05, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2015 12:05, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2015 11:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.01.2015 11:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.01.2015 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Irina Nikulina.

12.01.2015 10:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa gamma / Vladimir Bobow Syngrapha ain / Alexander Belousov.

12.01.2015 9:36, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2015 9:36, Nikolay Grebennikov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2015 9:36, Nikolay Grebennikov:

Thank agree

12.01.2015 2:46, Peter Khramov:

Well so why not now replace this fotoy Fautua №15664 (and similarly with the other, that Vasily removal zakommentil)?

12.01.2015 2:20, Irina Nikulina:

This is not the gamma, I think, andSyngrapha ain

12.01.2015 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then to Peter removal. And better to replace the same :)

11.01.2015 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nicholas, the shape and the aberration is infravidovye taxa and taxonomists are interested in, as well as the Russian name. View defined, and then it is your desire to include some form of a butterfly. Outside checkered very changeable and it makes no sense to give each form of its name.

11.01.2015 23:20, Irina Nikulina:

By lit.dannym wingspan for trifenestrata 65-100mm. She looked most photos of male (with a ruler) - from 61- 67mm. I'm not sure that is correct to endure inaccurate trifenestrata. With the same success can be put this photo in inaccurate vietnama or jordani , which are often found in Vietnam and have about the same size.Or maybe it's a smaller species found in Vietnam -Cricula hoffmanni.
With regard to the highly desirable Dimensioning collection. copies - more than once wrote about it. Often so much time can be saved by reducing the number of possible types of consideration.

11.01.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fixed basis and that the island of Palawan is the Philippines to Indonesia and has nothing to do :)

11.01.2015 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

11.01.2015 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

11.01.2015 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, here, too, it would be useful to know the wingspan, as well as for all other trailers you copies. this kind.

11.01.2015 21:30, Andrey Kravtsov:

Chalcosia phalaenaria ?

11.01.2015 21:10, Alex Dumchus:

Small she approx. 55 mm

11.01.2015 21:08, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, something at the last change, when I swore active - probably about a month and a half ago, again begins to fail, and beat main picture, so I decided that I will not. And now, like, basic photo pozameneny bad, so I do not dvoyu, even on the new underside.

11.01.2015 20:56, Andrey Kravtsov:

Campylotes histrionicus?http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Campylotes_histrionicus

11.01.2015 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Taki inaccurate or the same determination to the race? And in scope - well, by the way. You can with the time and then there will be signs in the form to add, if that other sources of information is not present.

11.01.2015 20:51, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, you are not out to change the image in the framework of existing or ph?

11.01.2015 20:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sitochroa verticalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.01.2015 20:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.01.2015 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thanks for the fact that drew attention to the incorrect definition of the previous year. Certainly for an accurate determination of species of this genus is not enough only the appearance of butterflies.
Close and reliably distinguishable only by genital types of analysis does not automatically have to be in exact.I propose to transfer any and all Cricula trifenestrata in inaccurate.
Just all: I offer to take it a rule to specify the scope of all collectible copies. Himself repeatedly convinced that this is a great help for the correct definition / redefinition of the form.

11.01.2015 17:05, Alex Dumchus:

That's right, Basil.

11.01.2015 16:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15668 group.

11.01.2015 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, it does not take a photo zfcj 32044?

11.01.2015 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15660 group.

11.01.2015 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15707 group.

11.01.2015 16:13, Nikolay Grebennikov:

I am waiting for clarification

11.01.2015 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.01.2015 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Miltochrista miniata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.01.2015 12:32, Irina Nikulina:

Sitochroa verticalis

11.01.2015 12:30, Irina Nikulina:

Miltochrista miniata

11.01.2015 12:29, Irina Nikulina:

Plebejus argus

11.01.2015 12:29, Irina Nikulina:

Aphantopus hyperantus

11.01.2015 1:37, Peter Khramov:

Here, the process went like without glitches are now.

11.01.2015 1:37, Peter Khramov:

Paul, okay, so it is quite possible. A photo with such simple: the site are two pictures, although the picture will be the same to them.

11.01.2015 1:36, Peter Khramov:

Photo old general could then Dmitry specific name in the field for the subspecies drive ...

10.01.2015 23:02, Irina Nikulina:

Continuing the conversation about Cricula. I watched all kinds of descriptions and characteristics of the three most likely. (Vasily, would not exclude from consideration the views trifenestrata just because your other 5 specimens. Firstly, this type of many subspecies, and your peninsular 5 copies.may differ from the island, and secondly - but how and by whom they have been defined so precisely why, for example, or cameronensis bornea? Judging from the exposed one of them, everything can be) Cricula elaezia lives mainly at altitudes of 1500-2000 m, Cricula bornea more likely in low-lying p-tries, Cricula trifenestrata found everywhere. Trifenestrata and elaezia - larger species, bornea - smaller size male approx 50mm, I think, can be excluded from consideration.Of the three types of elaezia - with less red tint and is more suitable in size. And there is one more indication of the significant external difference males elaezia is about to.Borneo - have a dark sling ZK converge near the costal margin or connected diffusely blurred dark stripe (as in this picture)
But there is the 4th version, wrote Basil - view Cricula elaezioborneensis, descriptions of features that are not found.But if you look at it available for the photo, and some males of this species have the same feature as that elaezia. That is, both of these species under suspicion).The exact determination of the type of speech does not go here, but maybe you can and inaccurateCricula elaezia?
But what is more embarrassing - revised set of images and never met such acute (broken lines) tornalnyh angles VC only rounded. Maybe someone like that met?

10.01.2015 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Macaria notata / Zoran Bozovic Macaria alternata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2015 22:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Macaria notata / Zoran Bozovic Macaria alternata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2015 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15658 group.

10.01.2015 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

On the website in the "Full Name" under = mean anything. even if it is synonymous, then what subspecies? But in the end, it's Dmitri "cow" and let it milks her :))

10.01.2015 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15676 group.

10.01.2015 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15671 group.

10.01.2015 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15669 group.

10.01.2015 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15066 group.

10.01.2015 21:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nominative, not indicated in the cases where not indicated subspecies general, when a start point subtypes have picture where no subspecies means that subtype to be determined. :) Without specifying that it is a subspecies or ssp. It is not clear what is at stake, or subspecies, or simply an indication of the species name twice. :)

10.01.2015 20:27, Pavel Ivanov:

Scola and so do not need to know. Is it because you can not still go there probably is a butterfly photo yet.

10.01.2015 19:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia assimilata / Zoran Bozovic Eupithecia absinthiata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2015 19:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eupithecia absinthiata

10.01.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15040 group.

10.01.2015 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15039 group.

10.01.2015 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15055 group.

10.01.2015 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15068 group.

10.01.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15064 group.

10.01.2015 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15057 group.

10.01.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15053 group.

10.01.2015 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15046 group.

10.01.2015 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15051 group.

10.01.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15049 group.

10.01.2015 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15047 group.

10.01.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Peribatodes rhomboidaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2015 17:13, Basil Sergienko:

P.rhomboidaria

10.01.2015 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna vitellina / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2015 17:01, Basil Sergienko:

And for me as absinthiata

10.01.2015 17:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis roboraria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2015 16:49, Basil Sergienko:

Mythimna vitellina

10.01.2015 16:47, Basil Sergienko:

H.roboraria

10.01.2015 16:41, Basil Sergienko:

alternata, vnimmatelno I have not looked, but I think that all of the author's photo notata, and alternata

10.01.2015 16:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Hy-hy ... Then, by the way, is relevant to the question of what to do with the photos where two or more types: butterfly and beetle and grasshopper fly =)

10.01.2015 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All the same, I think that it is not necessary to write in the nominative top line. In my already said?

10.01.2015 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Remount group. Displayed incorrectly.

10.01.2015 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #29184 group.

10.01.2015 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

10.01.2015 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

10.01.2015 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15043 group.

10.01.2015 15:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #15042 group.

10.01.2015 15:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #14568 group.

10.01.2015 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #38449 group.

10.01.2015 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 15:14, Irina Nikulina:

C in such a vast dark pattern - f.fascelis, I think, but let the experts clarified.

10.01.2015 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is interesting to find out just :)
Here Quote: http://www.gbif.org/species/116754597
"Full Name
Papilio ctesias C. & R. Felder, 1865
Taxonomic status:
Synonym of Papilio menatius (Hübner, 1819) "
The conclusion is synonymous, and not a subspecies. It is not known why Dmitry him in this line written.
P.S. And online ctesias synonymous.

10.01.2015 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He returned as it was. Only here who would understand this confusion. And who is online subspecies drove here? Ctesias is not here, but there is P. m. ctesiades Rothschild & Jordan, 1906 full length :) interesting question, of course.

10.01.2015 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 13:59, Peter Khramov:

Right now Dima kantuper Pacino, will come, and I will punish all!

10.01.2015 13:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you can not, there ctesias taxon. Papilio ctesias C. & R. Felder, 1865 for Papilio menatius (Hübner, 1819) (http://www.gbif.org/species/search?q=Papilio_ctesias). ssp. ctesiades Rothschild & Jordan, 1906, clearly something drugoe.Tut understand it :))

10.01.2015 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Pointed.

10.01.2015 13:35, Nikolay Grebennikov:

f.xerophila or f.fascelis?

10.01.2015 13:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fixed because subspecies ctesias there :) Typo visible.

10.01.2015 13:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

The subspecies is only the author can specify a picture. :)

10.01.2015 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 13:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Svyatoslav, for your-mind, I agree with Sergienko.

10.01.2015 13:04, Irina Nikulina:

Why trifenestrata, Basil? Instead vietnama, for example? On what grounds? Here, even the size is not specified, it could even indirectly confirm. I not disputed, just to deal with the kind and would like to understand. Here there are some features that, I think, just for this kind of uncharacteristic.Actually not very clear almost all the definitions on the site in this genus, the more all photos and more precisely defined stand. Very difficult genus as the species mimnimum approx. 60 (instead of 4), it is very volatile, related species reliably determined by the genitive. Analysis of males (females are generally difficult-). In some species there is more or less clear external differences.signs, but in any case, for sure - it has something very bold)

10.01.2015 13:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #13869 group.

10.01.2015 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, head to this picture is?

10.01.2015 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #13877 group.

10.01.2015 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #13874 group.

10.01.2015 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #38110 group.

10.01.2015 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves photo # 32013

10.01.2015 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves photo # 32012

10.01.2015 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

This butterfly. Scola has not yet define :)

10.01.2015 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrium pruni / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.01.2015 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35733 group.

10.01.2015 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves photo # 32014

10.01.2015 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Photo # 32016 double if I am not mistaken. Alexander, right?

10.01.2015 12:22, Peter Khramov:

Auto-redirect to the appropriate page insecta.pro.

10.01.2015 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #14498 group.

10.01.2015 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #14527 group.

10.01.2015 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #14561 group.

10.01.2015 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #14559 group.

10.01.2015 12:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35807 group.

10.01.2015 12:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves photo # 38241

10.01.2015 11:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Will Lepidoptera.ru site? I think he should stay as the only site for butterflies. "Advertised" after all :))

10.01.2015 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.01.2015 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.01.2015 10:54, Irina Nikulina:

Melitaea trivia?

10.01.2015 9:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2014-07-08 00:00:00.

10.01.2015 9:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 9:27, Alex Dumchus:

Vasiily, we have the same topic was last summer with sailboats, and, in general, with butterflies. Week of January I were severe frosts, and that's povymerzali doll.

10.01.2015 1:26, Peter Khramov:

A. Thank you. At the time in the "official list" brought)

10.01.2015 1:25, Peter Khramov:

And why not? We have never written that these photos do not have to stand. So it's quite a question for discussion, not for approval ...

10.01.2015 0:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fixed geography (taken from the underside, which is in the group). Central African Republic is more untrue. African view on the island of Java and it can not be.

10.01.2015 0:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.01.2015 0:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.01.2015 0:35, Irina Nikulina:

efetov.konst@gmail.com

09.01.2015 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is impossible for her views opedelit in my opinion. Let no one be offended author, and take note that it is not necessary to put these photos.

09.01.2015 22:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Large such Spasib =)

09.01.2015 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now everything seems clear. And on the machine, to remove not do not have to :)

09.01.2015 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On Krupnyakov type of hawk moths tropical bezrybe possible. Approx. midway between №3 and 4 they are slightly shorter than the length of entomological across. Of course all this is not good (((

09.01.2015 21:30, Peter Khramov:

I have a plan like this:
1. In the near future to implement the binding ph supraspecific taxa and perhaps a subspecies.
2. If the cheater did issue a decision on the cards, the cards also. If you do not have time - it does not wait.
3. After that build on new types of butterflies and hundreds of thousands of species of other insects over the base taxa Lepidoptery.ru.
4. Upgrade Lepidoptera.ru/Lepidoptera.pro to Insecta.Pro in Russian and English languages.
After that, continue to work in the framework of this, the expanded project.
Who else thinks there are tasks that must be performed on site to n. 3?

09.01.2015 21:16, Peter Khramov:

People, napominte mail KA Efetov. It is necessary to write and address at not I will seek.

09.01.2015 21:08, Peter Khramov:

No, not a curve Opera. Browser does not matter here. See. The neighboring comment.

09.01.2015 21:07, Peter Khramov:

If Fota does not fit into the group at once, you just need to remove it from the previous group. Sometimes there may be such ghosts, when other photons in the group have in fact not, and with TZ foty view - there (due to the fact that there was a period when foty from the site could be deleted without deleting the information about them in the list of groups).You can make phot machine was removed from the previous group with the addition of the new. But there will be no warning, that, well, ale, phot already in the group. Obsuzhdaemo.

09.01.2015 21:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #34220 group.

09.01.2015 21:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

09.01.2015 20:50, Peter Khramov:

Boris, explain what you mean as "the description of the taxa"? If within species essays - where does the name of a species? If you are not in, then where does the page? Or are you about the First things description?

09.01.2015 20:49, Nikolay Grebennikov:

that's underside.

09.01.2015 20:44, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, or who has access to the author of determination - to hear the response to comments.

09.01.2015 20:41, Peter Khramov:

They agreed not to produce the same kind of doubles, and replace the old images with new at the same fote ...

09.01.2015 20:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ruttellerona lithina / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

09.01.2015 20:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ruttellerona lithina / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

09.01.2015 20:40, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there is not in the heads of these pins themselves are usually very thick.

09.01.2015 20:39, Peter Khramov:

So like so determined. Or is this a confirmation?

09.01.2015 20:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.01.2015 20:18, Alexander Belousov:

Female

09.01.2015 19:26, Peter Khramov:

Not everyone is clear on how fote can determine the type of, and for some it is impossible. I, for instance, is not obvious. A phot of itself is not bad.

09.01.2015 19:11, Alexander Belousov:

Here it is - Gone with the Wind! + K Photo # 38292

09.01.2015 19:04, Basil Sergienko:

alternata.

09.01.2015 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This ball, the way easily removed with pliers. If it is absolutely normal pins - trumpet.

09.01.2015 17:17, Irina Nikulina:

Ruttellerona lithina, male (see. Photo 30265)

09.01.2015 17:15, Irina Nikulina:

I think that thisRuttellerona lithinawith a description and picture of male lithina, which honors. feature is the presence of arched black bars located at the costal margin VC. It lives in the mountains at an altitude of 1200-2600 meters, most often found in the middle of the decree. height range (ie just about vys.1900m)

09.01.2015 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander the, but I do not removal. I just do groups: unfinished or kosyachny. Well, if you come across along the way doubles - marked for deletion for Peter.
And if Pavonia will work out this season - be sure to gather.This story is simple: in 2013 there were geese them at every step, and in 2014 found no one was even in those parts constantly run hither and on the same place. So there is not a season or what? I do not even know what to call it .....
With the holidays and you :)

09.01.2015 14:51, Alex Dumchus:

What creative bulavochka :)))

09.01.2015 14:50, Alex Dumchus:

Vasily, thank you. You took me seriously. Duplicates are removed. I soon distribute more photons. Now once. I try to bring in the divine form at least part of the collection. Well, the drink, of course - the Christmas holidays. In general, I expect you ever Greenough Pavone, raspberry growing. HAPPY HOLIDAYS.

09.01.2015 14:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.01.2015 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #12960 group.

09.01.2015 14:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.01.2015 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves photo # 31936

09.01.2015 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #12256 group.

09.01.2015 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves photo # 32027

09.01.2015 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves photo # 31939

09.01.2015 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Interesting purpose of issuing such a photo?

09.01.2015 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus thersites / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2015 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Plebejus argus.

09.01.2015 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2015 13:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ok, now I have a picture the back side of the wings and tie it all into the group :))

09.01.2015 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalonidia contractana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2015 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euproctis similis.

09.01.2015 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2015 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Herminia tarsipennalis / Zoran Bozovic Zanclognatha lunalis / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2015 12:45, Basil Sergienko:

I would call it good-Zanclognatha lunalis

09.01.2015 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amata phegea / Vitaly Gumenuk Amata nigricornis / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2015 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amata phegea / Vitaly Gumenuk Amata nigricornis / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2015 12:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amata phegea / Vitaly Gumenuk Amata nigricornis / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2015 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amata phegea / Vitaly Gumenuk Amata nigricornis / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2015 12:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amata phegea / Vitaly Gumenuk Amata nigricornis / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2015 12:31, Basil Sergienko:

This and all the photos are Gumenyuk A.nigricornis, I think so

09.01.2015 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Macaria notata / Zoran Bozovic Macaria alternata / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2015 12:12, Basil Sergienko:

Why not alternata?

09.01.2015 12:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phalonidia contractana / Zoran Bozovic Cochylidia implicitana / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2015 12:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phalonidia contractana / Zoran Bozovic Cochylidia implicitana / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2015 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This double photo # 38351 should be deleted. I rebuild the group.

09.01.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #38352 group.

09.01.2015 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

09.01.2015 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Basil on geminipuncta not pull.

09.01.2015 4:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Regarding extra. volume. Keys to insects of the Far East of Russia. Additional volume. Analysis of Fauna and general index nazvaniy. Vladivostok: Dal'nauka, 2011.-552 .. In this volume there is a general list of moths ET. This list in nature, like does not exist yet. This volume refers to the total number ve moths. Maybe you are interested, -privedu small link: page 159; 161.All regions combined into a 3-unit compared Far East, Siberia and Europe. Total 1018 species of moths. In DV Rosii 649 species in Siberia, 380 species for Europe, 596 species of moths.
In the Far East of Russia in the crust. vr.izvestno actually is according to the literature 657 species of moths.According to DV not included 8 questionable species, 7 of which can be specified as a result of mistaken identity and the validity of the type 1 is in doubt (Ourapteryx ussurica Inoue). Thus, the wealth of the fauna of moths Russian Far East is estimated at 649 species.
Ps.I've written that volume does not list the title, but in the name of these words (Analysis of Fauna and general index of names) are present. I took in this volume selectively several pages and could forget something. If necessary I can clarify whether there is a volume index of names.

09.01.2015 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, please indicate for all your photos that need to bind to a group of numbers opposite side :) And then, frankly difficult to seek compliance ....

09.01.2015 1:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35801 group.

09.01.2015 0:13, Andrey Kravtsov:

Zygaenidae

09.01.2015 0:11, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Firestarter!

08.01.2015 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reserves photo # 38343. rebuild the group.

08.01.2015 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #38344 group.

08.01.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 22:17, Basil Sergienko:

God forgive me, dear A.Matovza for my doubts, but I think that it Archanara and most likely, neurica, if there is no other similar. There is another view of the specimen., To it is also true.

08.01.2015 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mesapamea secalis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.01.2015 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pyrrhia umbra / Zoran Bozovic Gortyna flavago / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.01.2015 21:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.01.2015 21:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.01.2015 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.01.2015 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.01.2015 18:38, Alex Dumchus:

That's right, Basil. I'm kind of tied and maybe even where there are "schools" ..

08.01.2015 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, right, I joined? Litter has no need to bind to the group.

08.01.2015 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #23640 group.

08.01.2015 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36404 group.

08.01.2015 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36431 group.

08.01.2015 16:39, Alex Dumchus:

I still think it rumiko. Right in the park Xcaret has a garden babochek- bred them there. And caught me at the instance of the park at a distance of 10-15 km.

08.01.2015 16:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

He thought of thoas , because this instance spots in a sling on the front wing rounded (not pointed toward the outer edge, as in cresphontes -like). In addition, the band is on the rear wing is very wide. Generally thoas very volatile, but here is a question of subspecies autocles (see., Eg, http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Heraclides_thoas_autocles_a.htm) .Of course, if you define a "grown-up", it is recommended to watch the genitals. :)

08.01.2015 15:08, Boris Loboda:

Well then, as an alternative to printed sources I think it is appropriate.

08.01.2015 15:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35797 group.

08.01.2015 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.01.2015 14:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35806 group.

08.01.2015 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35799 group.

08.01.2015 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Boris, the proposed option is ideal, but unfortunately in this resource is not possible because there is a lot of information from the site.

08.01.2015 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35583 group.

08.01.2015 14:47, Boris Loboda:

In general, the description of the taxa adopted this form of links to sources (as an example) - Stenocephalus lautipes Stal, 1860a: 468
Author. Year. The letter (optional) - is the order of publication of the author, if there were a few a year. And page number at the source.
At least entomologists is familiar and understandable.
Perhaps it makes sense to bind: Taxa content.You will be able to see the publications which taxa are described and there at the same time on the taxon to see what are the publication.

08.01.2015 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35817 group.

08.01.2015 14:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35816 group.

08.01.2015 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene began to rake him :))

08.01.2015 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35580 group.

08.01.2015 14:18, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander, a collector at my Thoas Peru this line is not present, as in the photo 24089 completely black border of the wing. Looked atlases, others are Thoas.

08.01.2015 14:14, Alex Dumchus:

Yeah really, brought confusion ... but there is also Heraclides homothoas, and Heraclides melonius endemic Jamaican, such as similar

08.01.2015 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander did not understand what kind of line in question. But I see extra yellow spot in front of the solid yellow line, which is at all thoas, but there is in this species.

08.01.2015 14:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

And who is this?

08.01.2015 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No problem :)

08.01.2015 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 14:05, Alex Dumchus:

No, look - at Thoas no yellow line parallel to the edge of the front wings, cat. present in paeon, krespontes and new.

08.01.2015 14:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the other family has registered, help her out. :)

08.01.2015 13:57, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This hour is not thoas ? :)

08.01.2015 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35492 group.

08.01.2015 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35582 group.

08.01.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danis danis / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.

08.01.2015 13:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35976 group.

08.01.2015 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35980 group.

08.01.2015 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 13:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #29031 group.

08.01.2015 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That this problem came out. It is worth paying attention to the fact that the right is no other kind of photo. And it does not cling to the image of the group under the two browsers. By "dancing with a tambourine," managed to unite other photos in a group (to rebuild it), but this way (as I tried to move it again to mind - did not happen."Shamanism" described in the comments here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32958
Peter, deal. Very interesting is what troubles :)

08.01.2015 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #34223 group.

08.01.2015 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #34221 group.

08.01.2015 12:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #34220 group.

08.01.2015 12:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 12:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 12:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, all right, Eugene identified one instance and pointed to the original description. Based on the first description, I spotted another copy from the gallery, and you identified from their duties and put the photo. I can easily put some more photos of this kind of Eugene, but it is not quite true. :)

08.01.2015 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yesterday did not work out at Opera x64 v12.17 (my primary browser). Who has tried out under the Mozilla Firefox v31.0 (spare) - turned out. Even it is not clear: this opera is a curve or with the site engine something? Amazing things :) Now I will continue to "khimichit" ....

08.01.2015 11:48, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander. I did not specify, it's Evgeniy- he introduced a new kind of :)))

08.01.2015 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #32957 group.

08.01.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #32956 group.

08.01.2015 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio rumiko / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

08.01.2015 11:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papilio cresphontes / Alex Dumchus Papilio rumiko / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.01.2015 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papilio cresphontes / Alex Dumchus Papilio rumiko / Eugene Karolinskiy.

08.01.2015 11:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Papilio cresphontes / Alex Dumchus Papilio rumiko / Eugene Karolinskiy.

08.01.2015 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

08.01.2015 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

08.01.2015 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

08.01.2015 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

08.01.2015 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

I thought, he was determined from the images with these forums, a lot of mistakes. Of course part of the exhibit that he could not identify. On lepiforume and I defined it, he does not write the definition of the authors.

08.01.2015 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

08.01.2015 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

08.01.2015 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

08.01.2015 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pingasa alba / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.01.2015 10:32, Shamil Murtazin:

32956, 32957, 32958 (this photo), 32959, 34220, 34221, 34222, 34223 - the same instance.
(I would like combining photographs into a single group. not critical)

08.01.2015 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside there? Please specify the number if you can not tie yourself to the group. In case more than two hundred photos in LC and try to discover in this mass thankless job (((

08.01.2015 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36458 group.

08.01.2015 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36487 group.

08.01.2015 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36489 group.

08.01.2015 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

08.01.2015 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36488 group.

08.01.2015 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

08.01.2015 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36491 group.

08.01.2015 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36502 group.

08.01.2015 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36503 group.

08.01.2015 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36591 group.

08.01.2015 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36596 group.

08.01.2015 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36597 group.

08.01.2015 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36603 group.

08.01.2015 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36604 group.

08.01.2015 9:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36607 group.

08.01.2015 9:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36609 group.

08.01.2015 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36611 group.

08.01.2015 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36613 group.

08.01.2015 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36614 group.

08.01.2015 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #23645 group.

08.01.2015 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36617 group.

08.01.2015 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36619 group.

08.01.2015 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36621 group.

08.01.2015 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The top of it there? Her God has entangled (

08.01.2015 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36687 group.

08.01.2015 9:45, Alex Dumchus:

Ladies and gentlemen, in my humble opinion, in the course of your discussions, I realized that I am the happy owner of the type described just three weeks ago?If so, then dial the audacity to give the photo caught my sailboat in Mexico, though in a completely killed condition (was crushed in a net and stayed, and these are usually releasing) similar to the above. He was caught in the Riviera Maya (near Cancun, Pts. Away from Veracruz) in November 2013And I will give a picture of the park with Xsaret species of butterflies living there, where he is described as H.cresphontes

08.01.2015 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36690 group.

08.01.2015 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36692 group.

08.01.2015 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36693 group.

08.01.2015 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nominative subspecies in the top line does not need to write (this is where the species name is repeated twice).

08.01.2015 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36696 group.

08.01.2015 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 7:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Nothing terrible, Alexander! Clarity introduced, oriented in the future, and to track possible changes already possible. Thank you !

08.01.2015 5:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Others looked. Kinds. With Irina agrees that the picture Pingasa alba. Pictured is the largest foreign perevyaz.- on the front wings, it is really very smooth, smooth, less curved, which distinguishes it from dr.vidov are found. The nature of the teeth on this sling is also somewhat different from the others. Species.

08.01.2015 1:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter is the same bug that was my revelers. It is necessary to attach here 32956 and 32957 as requested by Shamil.

08.01.2015 1:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #32957 group.

08.01.2015 1:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #32958 group.

08.01.2015 1:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 1:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 1:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #32956 group.

08.01.2015 1:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 1:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

View added, but did not yet carry. Nnobhodimy more opinions on this subject :)

08.01.2015 1:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dindica para / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.01.2015 1:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dindica para / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.01.2015 1:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #35874 group.

08.01.2015 0:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

You understand allusions? Please note: a hint. (c) :)

Kind of nice to add (and what is the "right" structure of childbirth - be left to the curators shmuratorov ...). :)

08.01.2015 0:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36445 group.

08.01.2015 0:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it is necessary to specify who owns any underside :)

08.01.2015 0:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All the same, I found the top :)

08.01.2015 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36444 group.

08.01.2015 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think no one will not mind that I put the definition of Alexander Dumchusa. This photo is uploaded much later than # 36443 :)

08.01.2015 0:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Kravtsov Alex Dumchus.

08.01.2015 0:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36508 group.

08.01.2015 0:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36425 group.

08.01.2015 0:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36387 group.

08.01.2015 0:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36397 group.

08.01.2015 0:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36401 group.

08.01.2015 0:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36432 group.

08.01.2015 0:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36498 group.

08.01.2015 0:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36496 group.

08.01.2015 0:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36495 group.

08.01.2015 0:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36492 group.

08.01.2015 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36451 group.

08.01.2015 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36454 group.

08.01.2015 0:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36505 group.

08.01.2015 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36436 group.

08.01.2015 0:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36579 group.

08.01.2015 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36587 group.

08.01.2015 0:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36594 group.

08.01.2015 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More well-to clarification from the author which is now the top looking to the group to connect these disparate underside and upper classes :)
At random will not undertake.

08.01.2015 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

08.01.2015 0:02, Peter Khramov:

It is necessary to clarify Cameroon? There's a kind of a country as an eight to seven.

08.01.2015 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 0:00, Peter Khramov:

You press the edit button at the bottom of this page and in the other photons from the same individual you write the number 36396.

08.01.2015 0:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

08.01.2015 0:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.01.2015 23:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #36392 group.

07.01.2015 23:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea midamus / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.01.2015 23:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea midamus / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

07.01.2015 23:57, Peter Khramov:

Untethered. Miracles can not be there, if that is not so - the request signal.

07.01.2015 23:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis dumetana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.01.2015 23:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis dumetana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.01.2015 23:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Google does not see everything, but a lot, so - cool.

07.01.2015 23:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasippa heliodore / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

07.01.2015 23:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasippa heliodore / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

07.01.2015 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. I just tried to disengage, too, and then add one: did not happen. The case of a rare, thank God. And so, normal and clear all at once :)

07.01.2015 23:51, Peter Khramov:

That's what the curators and need - to put points on the E within the site (although the view has every right to change over time, but still need some source of final verdict, at least "for now" to these questions).

07.01.2015 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, there was a bug that was issued comments on the page foty that everything is OK suffered, and it is not tolerated. This I corrected. And the very same problem was that foty were in two different groups. Now I unhooked both fresh foty apart and carried them to the same old group (based on foty 4301). Ieit was necessary to first 36322 and 34276 be removed from the general group and then individually transferred to 4301. The group has been transferred over to the group, only the group Fota, huh?

07.01.2015 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.01.2015 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.01.2015 23:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.01.2015 23:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #4301 group.

07.01.2015 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.01.2015 23:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #4301 group.

07.01.2015 23:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

The authors describe the rumiko belong to the "problem of Papilio vs Heraclides " just without excessive fanaticism, specifically by making relevant comments in the article. They write that the for the Neotropics in their opinion it is more convenient to split Papilio , and result in arguments. At the same time many other works are all united in the Papilio .In the end, race, unlike the species - a subjective category (or, I would say be careful, kind of - category is much more subjective than the kind ... :)).

07.01.2015 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, all the rules. Working :)

07.01.2015 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.

07.01.2015 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK thanks. Wait a try to master. Phoned the next day necessary.

07.01.2015 22:25, Peter Khramov:

The list has been updated again.

07.01.2015 22:20, Peter Khramov:

I waited a while after download ph. I put the illustrations, where objections were not. Where will the specifics - will change and display of pictures.
ZY As I understand it, it determines the most part does not itself, as mentioned in the comments on the forums.

07.01.2015 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Did. Instructions sent to the e-mail.

07.01.2015 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determination Zoran Bozovic is highly questionable in accuracy.

07.01.2015 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Also Heraclides rumiko

07.01.2015 20:56, Peter Khramov:

Overseas will be sought in the framework Insecta.Pro or at least within the new Lepidoptera.Pro, ie a single international portal, where all boundaries between the languages ​​will not be. Including not a single Russian site.

07.01.2015 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And where else was going to look for? Our foreign friends here all the activity is close to zero (
Pessimism solid, in short ......

07.01.2015 20:26, Peter Khramov:

If we rely only on the Russian Federation - it is already the tube. What is really Tama molbiol.

07.01.2015 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On Molbiole with exotic matter-tube ((

07.01.2015 20:20, Peter Khramov:

If Dmitry Pozhogin become curator of the exotic, then sort out. If you will not, boom somebody else to look.

07.01.2015 20:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

07.01.2015 20:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri is all very difficult, all kinds of what you have caused in the catalog, but they are in other genera. Celypha doubledayana (Barrett, 1872), Syricoris moderata (Falkovitsh, 1962), Celypha rivulana (Scopoli, 1763)
Celypha siderana (Treitschke, 1835), Olethreutes siderana Treitschke, 1834, Syricoris symmathetes (Caradja, 1916)
Loxosterma kind of, I do not find, it's probably a typo, and the genus in Loxoterma synonyms for Celypha. And the kind of siderana (Treitschke, 1835) in the old PHIARIS
Type in symmathetes subspecies Syricoris lacunana. complex there :))

07.01.2015 20:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

07.01.2015 20:14, Peter Khramov:

People, why you do not take away? Look, many regular users it hangs. What for? He takes the top spot, and infa him to you and as well known ...

07.01.2015 20:13, Peter Khramov:

Svyatoslav, loads of photo opportunities without the lines and in the comments, if there is such a need, just write wingspan or the size of the wing. We have the same site rather than book where space is limited and visibility zero.

07.01.2015 20:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

07.01.2015 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So because I did not do anything with her, Alexander.
Simple and Papilio cresphontes here is in the subgenus Heraclides.
We are waiting for "the sea weather" :)

07.01.2015 19:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, all that you brought, that's good, but ...!
The species was described three weeks ago :) Yevgeny which have been described in the genus Heraclides, and should be of great audacity :)) that would immediately transfer to another genus. The authors describe probably stupider than we, since we reject their generic version immediately. :) That's why I wrote the work for the curator.But the butterfly, there are not one photo of this species in Mexico, too. And maybe you're right, you need to create a view in the subgenus, going to deal with his conscience :), but then the authors in brackets as Eugene wrote. but this is not correct :(

07.01.2015 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.01.2015 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here is a link to the source: http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/vvdubat/pdf/AWFE_6_59-70.pdf
But the trouble is probably that other bases yet. Also, both the absence and kind of list Sinev :)

07.01.2015 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.01.2015 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same thing: the top was undefined.

07.01.2015 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio nireus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

07.01.2015 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By analogy with the previously specific riding.

07.01.2015 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio isidorus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.01.2015 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It somehow underside has been identified, and the top is not. Corrected))

07.01.2015 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio astyalus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

07.01.2015 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK thanks. Do I still have to unleash curves interface groups (such as that written). Time now, "wagon" Free me (same happened: he became unemployed).

07.01.2015 17:07, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you put down on the transfer of the right ph. Let's just no rush.
Regarding supervision and editing of taxa on the site:
1. The curators have access only to their taxa.
eleven. Within these taxa no division in Asia and Asia.Therefore, if the curator can edit some, such as the family, he can edit it ALL (technically).
12. If two taxa overlap curators - they must agree among themselves on the interaction or spheres of influence between themselves within the taxon.Discuss controversial issues well right on the page taxon (if the information is public and there is nothing secret).
2. Add new taxa have the right to all the users of the subject (ie users with elevated privileges), asFor example, the curator can supervise only the European part of the taxon, and add something you need to be in Australia. Ho. Again. Self-censorship is not part of the climb to the taxa that are under curators. To add a new taxa in their appeal to the curators (page taxon parent preferred).If there is no reaction from them - to inform me or everyone and everything. A current list of curators (and not only them) - is always the first message threads http://lepidoptera.ru/community/27790.
Accordingly, the curators are asked to promptly respond to comments on the addition of new taxa.

07.01.2015 16:59, Peter Khramov:

Updated list with the right. Now atkualnaya version of the list will be published / updated in the first post topic.

07.01.2015 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acleris effractanafor Russia is not at all. The list Sinev do not have this type.
It is necessary to study why effractana.

07.01.2015 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Nikolay Savenkov, lepidopterist of the Latvian Museum of Nature, said that this is not A. emargana, and A. effractana.

07.01.2015 14:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Here on this site Heraclides have subgenus Papilio: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/32239
There also have to make an appearance.

07.01.2015 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I think, from the east paleakticheskoy zone and to the Urals (the term Northern Asia is not entirely successful, of course), and there is no longer Europe can :)
No problem, I think will not be if you act together :)

07.01.2015 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, here is:
http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/heraclides_rumiko_types1.htm
A source at the moment, the most truthful in my opinion in America :)

07.01.2015 13:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Super, but another kind of catalog no. and perhaps even to his Papilio no one moved in the literature. Quite a difficult question just for the curator. :)

07.01.2015 13:44, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This Heraclides rumiko Shiraiwa & Grishin, 2014 (or, if you will, Papilio rumiko (Shiraiwa & Grishin, 2014)). See. ZooKeys 468: 85-135 (2014).

07.01.2015 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

I am afraid that we are getting into some zone deep in the intersection, What is North Asia? Asian Russia? I am a curator of European fauna, Knyazev Asiatic Russia? and many kinds of the general. I do not think there will be problems, but how it will address issues if the opinion of the curators of common taxa will diverge?

07.01.2015 11:10, Pavel Ivanov:

Thank you all for your comments! I did not know that my photos will cause many reviews. About wind, butterflies sit down on the spikes interesting, like the once had.

07.01.2015 7:18, Alexander Belousov:

Sometimes it happens self-Saboya. I saw myself in the desert - scared male-bear, and his gust of wind and the spread on dzhingil. It happened just a couple of seconds. Then he began to pay attention to the thorns who just does not hang. But the Shrike will not be canceled!

07.01.2015 1:48, Yuri Semejkin:

I deal with their tortricidae and get neponyatka. The site seems to be missing, and 2 kinds of Loxosterma Loxoterma. In any case, nothing in writing does not "pop up".
But these two kinds referred to in the following references (he is in the internet). The fauna of the Far East, Issue 6, Blagoveshchensk, 2007 -in Article V. Dubatolov and AA Syachinoy page 64-65 Tribe Olethreutini
1.Forms of the first kind: Loxosterma doubledayana (Barrett, 1872); L. moderata (Falkovitsh, 1962); and L.rivulana (Scopoli, 1761)
2. Types of second order: Loxoterma siderana (Treitschke, 1835) and Loxoterma symmathetes (Caradja, 1916)
Here are the things here. Does anyone clarify the situation. Whether these types of online skipped, then you have to add. Is it synonymous, though never saw it invalid names.

06.01.2015 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I recommend interested in the proposal to Svyatoslav Knyazev Molbiol: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=235476&view=findpost&p=1525531
And at the same time to restore it to the system area :)

06.01.2015 19:42, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Ufffff ..... And I sat there, puffing, not already know how to respond to such barbarity ..... Dear Comrades, let us in the publication of such ambiguous (at a glance) shots to give comments, huh?

06.01.2015 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not know Thai, but about the Shrike: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Серый_сорокопут
Indeed bird suffers from it :)

06.01.2015 18:46, Alex Dumchus:

And it reminds me of Thais who once posted on the website photos. He probably hand-shrike :)

06.01.2015 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:))))

06.01.2015 18:18, Alex Dumchus:

Come you- shrike. He is flying fast, in a hurry for a date, that ran on a branch, as a joke - "Hello girls." Or sipokku committed or, in our opinion, seppuku :))

06.01.2015 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. Well: Shrike can safely be called a colleague :))))

06.01.2015 16:56, Pavel Ivanov:

I would not zashto did not! It harvests so shrike prey catches insects, lizards sit down on the spikes and then when the food is not found, picks and eats harvested stocks.

06.01.2015 15:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"On the count of it !!!" :)
The original method of impaling .....
None of the collection never seen such a (((
What with him so mercilessly?

06.01.2015 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Until inaccurate. Although almost no doubt: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id192539/
A link is given in the author's comments, you can read more in the form :)
I would ask is nothing to do with her except for comment. I wait for his time :)

06.01.2015 8:48, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

06.01.2015 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Yes, now you can start the tropics all.
Rights will return within the next couple of days.

06.01.2015 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tabidia strigiferalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.01.2015 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That is, in the tropics, you can start all except Coleophoridae?
And yet this question, "the nail on the head." What about the temporary I have selected the rights already October 24 of last year?
Or nothing is permanent as a temporary? :)

05.01.2015 23:31, Irina Nikulina:

"Die Hard" yet succumbed, less than a year :) ItTabidia strigiferalis- the only species of the genus in the RFE. http://insect.naas.go.kr/search/class_spe_view.asp?ord_id=R1&family_id=EL&gen_nm=Tabidia&species_id=ZR1EL0166&search_gb=02&left_gb=A
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=273069

05.01.2015 22:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

05.01.2015 22:34, Peter Khramov:

The interface for supervisors launched (currently send out instructions), make new taxa may now again all believed-Find Topics Find Topics (ie, everyone who has access to this topic). Ho.Now, for the institution of taxa new rules:
Within the groups for which the site has the curators of new taxa we we start only after approval of these most curators or just ask them to add a new taxon (in the comments to the parent taxon).
Currently, supervisors have for the following groups:
Palearctic Rhopalocera - Stanislav Korb.All Coleophoridae , as well as European Totricoidea , Noctuidea , Pyraloidea - Alexander Zhakov.
Therefore, all progress in the system for these groups - only with the consent of the curators.

05.01.2015 22:32, Irina Nikulina:

Caterpillar

05.01.2015 13:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ematheudes punctella / Zoran Bozovic Agriphila inquinatella / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.01.2015 13:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ematheudes punctella / Zoran Bozovic Agriphila inquinatella / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.01.2015 10:42, Pavel Ivanov:

I'll see. Most likely I will display the tracks, if all goes as it should, then you can easily share their wakes. It is still too early to say in May to discuss.

04.01.2015 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Friedlanderia cicatricella / Zoran Bozovic Ematheudes punctella / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Friedlanderia cicatricella / Zoran Bozovic Ematheudes punctella / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Sergey Novitckiy.

04.01.2015 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sergey Novitckiy Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.01.2015 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.01.2015 22:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Endothenia marginana / Zoran Bozovic Hedya ochroleucana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Endothenia marginana / Zoran Bozovic Hedya ochroleucana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.01.2015 22:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupsilia transversa / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Not identified.

04.01.2015 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pleuroptya ruralis / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Not identified.

04.01.2015 22:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pleuroptya ruralis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yponomeuta irrorella / Zoran Bozovic Yponomeuta plumbella / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 22:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yponomeuta irrorella / Zoran Bozovic Yponomeuta plumbella / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nomophila noctuella / Zoran Bozovic Udea ferrugalis / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna turca / Zoran Bozovic Mythimna albipuncta / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Watsonalla cultraria / Zoran Bozovic Watsonalla binaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Watsonalla cultraria / Zoran Bozovic Watsonalla binaria / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.01.2015 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.01.2015 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pandemis dumetana / Zoran Bozovic Epagoge grotiana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis desertorum / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 19:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oncocera semirubella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyralis perversalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 19:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dicycla oo / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 19:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthophilopsis baphialis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 18:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gymnoscelis rufifasciata Philereme transversata.

04.01.2015 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Incurvaria masculella / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Incurvaria masculella / Zoran Bozovic Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.01.2015 15:25, Alex Dumchus:

I put pyrene in certain inaccurate. I am waiting for confirmation.

04.01.2015 15:23, Alex Dumchus:

Who determined ?? It is more similar to M.procris

04.01.2015 14:47, Alex Dumchus:

Stichopthalma howqua ??? although the underside is more like louisa.

04.01.2015 14:16, Peter Khramov:

Why is inaccurate, if the view does not get defined.

04.01.2015 13:44, Alex Dumchus:

If the female, and judging by the caterpillar - it is, try to dissolve. Just hatched it should be closer to 9 - May 15, we have at this time is just years. But males do arrive. I was a child repeatedly deduced pear, only here in the winter, my mother did not give pupae in the fridge to put ... If the Gren - ask, can exchange. All the trees for food - and dwarf, are present.I live in Novocherkassk, somewhere nearby. I wanted and Pavon vyvesti- kind of rare for us (a little raspberry is), but Vasily something with Grenier pulled.

04.01.2015 11:03, Pavel Ivanov:

Yes! Now just waiting for a cocoon of beauty in my spring. A rare indeed become the year before last pieces 50 met this year only 2 tracks.

04.01.2015 8:52, Alex Dumchus:

The Beauty! Paul, you have not collected cocoons case? For a long time I would like to dissolve, the benefit of apple and pear trees in the courtyard are available. And then, something in our region, it has become rare.

04.01.2015 4:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Exit prompt: in inaccurate :)
This is the case if you have enough confidence to say "it is not", but there is no considerations on the theme of who it is mostly of ...

04.01.2015 1:15, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, with views of yet do not do anything, I need to protestit one thing on the site ...

04.01.2015 1:01, Peter Khramov:

Well yes. Therefore, the user №2 is not going away ...

04.01.2015 1:00, Peter Khramov:

Why the reluctance, if the determination is incorrect?

03.01.2015 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Edit the message above. This is the story, Peter :)

03.01.2015 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you're just explanatory, why leave access Vlad juzverej-how to believe, and not as a standard?

03.01.2015 22:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

The vague reluctance. in some little confidence. Maybe something I do not know :)

03.01.2015 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's kind of like a London now and long ago. Peter, do not delete it. All the same, number 2 on the site :)
The site should honor their oldest members. Otherwise .... worthless that site (((

03.01.2015 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Participation Vlad was very helpful to the site, but the last time he was on the site in November 2013. When activated again - add, is not a problem.

03.01.2015 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All right. Irina for a long time should add. Vlad Proklova brought too early in my opinion :)

03.01.2015 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Updated list of users with access to this subject (see. First post of topics). I removed a lot of "silent ones" and added Irina Nikulin. If you think someone you want to add / subtract reported.

03.01.2015 16:14, Peter Khramov:

So and what can not tolerate?

03.01.2015 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis punctinalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.01.2015 23:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.01.2015 23:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nola aerugula / Zoran Bozovic Meganola albula / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nola aerugula / Zoran Bozovic Meganola albula / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nola aerugula / Zoran Bozovic Meganola albula / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nola aerugula / Zoran Bozovic Meganola albula / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 23:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nola aerugula / Zoran Bozovic Meganola albula / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cyclophora punctaria / Zoran Bozovic Cyclophora linearia / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.01.2015 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypomecis roboraria / Zoran Bozovic Ectropis crepuscularia / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypomecis roboraria / Zoran Bozovic Ectropis crepuscularia / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 23:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immutata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

02.01.2015 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epicallia villica.

02.01.2015 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

01.01.2015 15:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Although with some delay, let me join in congratulating and the Far East. All a Happy New Year! All participants of the site more health, more happiness and good luck, patience and perseverance. Naturally we meet and good pictures.

01.01.2015 2:27, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius taxila

31.12.2014 21:41, Alexander Belousov:

2015 th, forty minutes - normal flight !!! Dear colleagues, Happy New Year! Personally, for me, it was a good year, even if the next will not be worse! To all of you happiness, good health (well, or even just health), so that the hands are not shaking head does not hurt, and legs do not get tired (of a net keep up!).

31.12.2014 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Those least Leonova collection stored there normally.
And God himself will become a curator :)

31.12.2014 19:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I went to the link
August 26th, 2030 at 12:15 AM
The railway is already in '30 he said. And you say good. The main thing is not a museum - the main curator.

31.12.2014 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, no, Dim :) We have good museums:
http://www.museum.ru/M2536
http://kray-mus-zheld.livejournal.com/
Something like this. Just have people appreciate its history :)

31.12.2014 18:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A collection, Basil, is better for me to bequeath))) The only collection of museums of Russia moths and carpet beetle needed.

31.12.2014 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing, Dim. Come to life, I think. There is now plenty of cases: it is necessary to look for a job (retired yet), it is necessary to think about life, etc.
Over time, I think everything will fall into place. What place on the site has always :)
Again. Holiday greetings!!!

31.12.2014 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

The definition is not correct, maybeIncurvaria oehlmanniella

31.12.2014 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

The definition is not correct, maybeIncurvaria oehlmanniella

31.12.2014 18:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Happy New Year! See site really withered. We note only 4 people.

31.12.2014 18:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Epicallia villica / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.12.2014 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Irina Nikulina.

31.12.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And for bugs :) :) And for people Mikhalych does not roll his uniqueness.
For us, Alexander :)

31.12.2014 16:57, Alex Dumchus:

Happy New Year!!! We raise glasses in the style of General Mikhailovich, "Well - for the butterflies !!!"

31.12.2014 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alex, thank you :) Good luck to your endeavor :) This is just the beginning, and if it is necessary to collect and / kollektirovat teach.
I think his collection hang regional museum, the train (last Obiralovka where Anna Karenina by Tolstoy rushed under a train). I hope that the collection will remain in the history.
I wish you success.You have wonderful pictures :)

31.12.2014 15:15, Alex Lender:

Thank you for your congratulations! I also want to congratulate all new course and wish you success, health and happiness! I'm a novice photographer, just discovering closeup, though butterflies fascinated since childhood. Home came recently, but it is interesting here. And thanks to all those who determine the types of site!

31.12.2014 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you can remove if you think it necessary.

31.12.2014 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I join the congratulations :)
A Happy 2015 !!!
The image will be summer, because with the advent of the new year is approaching the time when nature comes to life after a long hibernation
In the photo Church of the Kazan Icon of the Mother of God in Alpatieva: https: //ru.wikipedia.org / wiki / Alpatevo_ (village)
In the vicinity of this village in 2012, two colleagues had discovered a populationZerynthia polyxena, perhaps the only one in the Moscow region. Later, we went to one person there, but did not find any Polixena nor kirkazona who eats the caterpillar ((Then we need to go and look :)
A photo Polixena most of these places are on the site.It can be seen here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22589
During an unsuccessful trip and this picture was taken. So, we can say that it has something to do with the butterflies :)

P.S. Yesterday, a few are not there and if congratulated the oleander hawk Photo Gallery does not need it can be removed (written by him).

31.12.2014 0:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, almost asleep. Later. Seysas inadequate. It's just a NG congratulated :)

31.12.2014 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Type in the phone if I do not sleep more ...

31.12.2014 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, not so much here from the Railway, I think (we do not). Yes, and against the backdrop of a mountain ash. Or dam site nerii?

31.12.2014 0:01, Peter Khramov:

In my opinion it is not obvious. I would write, what to what ...

30.12.2014 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And your not?

30.12.2014 22:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protoboarmia faustinata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.12.2014 22:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cusiala stipitaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.12.2014 22:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Peribatodes rhomboidaria / Zoran Bozovic Hypomecis punctinalis / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 22:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Peribatodes rhomboidaria / Zoran Bozovic Ectropis crepuscularia / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 21:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe helle / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

30.12.2014 21:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe helle / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

30.12.2014 21:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neope pulaha / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

30.12.2014 21:58, Peter Khramov:

Dime, you endure, do not be shy ...

30.12.2014 21:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neope pulaha / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

30.12.2014 21:54, Peter Khramov:

Well shtozh to thousands quires not there yet, but we are on the way! Pozdravlyams all wish that before the following NG in congratulations did not need to add "... in spite of the full Achtung mixed with outrage, going on in the country as well as the complete absence of any sign of even thoughts about the appropriate ways to remedy the situation .. . "

30.12.2014 21:51, Peter Khramov:

Dumash, there is a sense in fote?

30.12.2014 21:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea seriata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 18:31, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea seriata

30.12.2014 18:20, Basil Sergienko:

This is the same specimens. That frontal photo

30.12.2014 18:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A Happy 2015 everyone!
"Firstborn". Against the backdrop of the fall of the Moscow region, and mountain ash :)

30.12.2014 18:14, Basil Sergienko:

A bold statement. There's a picture, I think, the same specimens. In Serbia, there are of course both, but not raspralennuyu determine whether it is possible? For us it would be triplasia.

30.12.2014 17:30, Irina Nikulina:

Happy 2015 congratulate all of you, dear friends! Let him live, grow and prosper our site and joint efforts in the new year! Successful season 2015, new discoveries and valuable staff, the new steps in the knowledge of the living world, which can not be known until the end!) Happiness and health to you and your loved ones!Traditional Alcina on the Christmas tree - messenger of the Far Eastern land - for everyone who gives a piece of themselves, their time and for the life of the soul of the site. And thank you to Peter for our common space where the interests of many people agreed))

30.12.2014 17:12, Basil Sergienko:

crepuscularia

30.12.2014 17:12, Basil Sergienko:

H.punctinalis

30.12.2014 17:11, Basil Sergienko:

M.albula

30.12.2014 17:10, Basil Sergienko:

M.albula

30.12.2014 17:07, Basil Sergienko:

Meganola albula

30.12.2014 16:50, Basil Sergienko:

Sasha decided to look again at this, given your question ,. I think you're right, this is not it. Upon closer inspection (size does not feel), I think Ph.transversata, although the picture is to be thrown.

30.12.2014 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Horisme corticata / Zoran Bozovic Horisme tersata / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 15:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Peribatodes rhomboidaria / Hypomecis punctinalis / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 15:47, Basil Sergienko:

H.punctinalis

30.12.2014 15:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapeta hamana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.12.2014 15:38, Basil Sergienko:

Cyclophora linearia-likely, but this shot ....

30.12.2014 15:31, Basil Sergienko:

E.crepuscularia

30.12.2014 15:29, Basil Sergienko:

Ectropis crepuscularia

30.12.2014 15:25, Basil Sergienko:

S.immutata

30.12.2014 15:22, Basil Sergienko:

This-H.tersata

30.12.2014 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula luridata Scotopteryx luridata.

30.12.2014 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula luridata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 15:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Noctua pronuba / Confidently identified Noctua comes / Tentatively identified.

30.12.2014 15:00, Basil Sergienko:

If you believe GME 3, it may be likely S.luridata

30.12.2014 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colostygia pectinataria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.12.2014 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gymnoscelis rufifasciata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectropis crepuscularia / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 14:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Camptogramma bilineata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 13:47, Basil Sergienko:

Gymnoscelis rufifasciata, if you can learn something

30.12.2014 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=89959

30.12.2014 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic Alexandr Zhakov.

30.12.2014 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=89959

30.12.2014 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic Alexandr Zhakov.

30.12.2014 13:40, Basil Sergienko:

Ectropis crepuscularia

30.12.2014 13:36, Basil Sergienko:

Camptogramma bilineata

30.12.2014 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oncocera semirubella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.12.2014 13:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutella xylostella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.12.2014 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Miltochrista miniata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.12.2014 13:24, Basil Sergienko:

I doubt I dumayu- shabby comes

30.12.2014 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definition:
http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=89933

30.12.2014 13:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic Alexandr Zhakov.

30.12.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

30.12.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

30.12.2014 13:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea deversaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.12.2014 13:06, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea deversaria

30.12.2014 13:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agrotis vestigialis Ancylis apicella.

30.12.2014 11:32, Zoran Bozovic:

Scotopteryx sp *

30.12.2014 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The admin has been signed by the author as P_rhomboidaria. I pulled out.

30.12.2014 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lathronympha strigana / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

30.12.2014 1:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis punctinalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.12.2014 1:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.12.2014 1:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nomophila noctuella / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

30.12.2014 0:39, Andrey Ponomarev:

Nomophila noctuella

30.12.2014 0:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Now from inaccurate and can be removed

30.12.2014 0:12, Irina Nikulina:

Cusiala stipitariaIdentified D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

30.12.2014 0:11, Irina Nikulina:

Protoboarmia faustinataIdentified D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

29.12.2014 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia sophia / Basil Sergienko Eupithecia bohatschi / Alexander Belousov.

29.12.2014 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, I look a little bit but not defined, in certain pieces of music will certainly be, I'll look, but moths desirable that looked Sergienko. :)

29.12.2014 22:56, Basil Sergienko:

Nu.navernoe so. It is difficult to doubt the determination of the leading specialist,

29.12.2014 22:38, Peter Khramov:

Please knowledgeable people (well, there are also those, right?) To walk on the last laid out fotam Zoran check definition.

29.12.2014 21:50, Irina Nikulina:

I doubt Shamil) Then another. All other doubles (besides) are no different.

29.12.2014 21:38, Shamil Murtazin:

I think Peter has written the author for being too "clarity" and some updated photos :)

29.12.2014 21:35, Irina Nikulina:

Reserves Photo # 37255 (here - with blurred background)

29.12.2014 20:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aethes decimana / Zoran Bozovic Aethes tesserana / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 20:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thiodia citrana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epicallia villica.

29.12.2014 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 19:08, Irina Nikulina:

"Muckraking" justified)) Thank you, Sasha!

29.12.2014 18:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idiochlora ussuriaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, congratulations on the result. :))

29.12.2014 18:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis phantomaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 18:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia cerasi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 18:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterophorus pentadactyla / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 18:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena proboscidalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 18:37, Irina Nikulina:

This butterfly Evgeniy sent in October (before the definition of Basil), the answer came today, but he identified it asEupithecia bohatschi. Basil, look, please, do you agree?

29.12.2014 18:29, Irina Nikulina:

Idiochlora ussuriariaIdentified D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI DVO RAN) And here is wrong, this butterfly is defined as pre-Hemistola zimmermanni, I did not think that there are such Idiochlora ussuriaria smoothed sling

29.12.2014 18:18, Irina Nikulina:

Hypomecis phantomariaDetermination confirmed D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI DVO RAN) And I can not say that it is very pleased with this confirmation, a very long time to deal with this photo)

29.12.2014 18:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyta luctuosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 18:14, Irina Nikulina:

Hypomecis punctinalisDetermination confirmed D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI DVO RAN) Dobavleno- version of the painting.

29.12.2014 18:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acontia lucida / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov Not identified.

29.12.2014 18:12, Irina Nikulina:

Hypomecis punctinalisDetermination confirmed D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

29.12.2014 18:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia lucida / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycia hirtaria / Zoran Bozovic Hypena rostralis / Basil Sergienko.

29.12.2014 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia candefacta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

29.12.2014 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula virgulata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 18:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula virgulata / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.12.2014 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Basil Sergienko Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea biselata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

29.12.2014 18:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Abraxas sylvata / Vladimir Bobow Abraxas fulvobasalis / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Inurois fumosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.12.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anticypella diffusaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 17:58, Basil Sergienko:

Hypena rostralis

29.12.2014 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

I somehow do not understand that in the comments of the author?

29.12.2014 17:38, Basil Sergienko:

Acontia candefacta

29.12.2014 17:21, Irina Nikulina:

Anticypella diffusariaIdentified D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

29.12.2014 17:19, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula virgulatafemale Identified D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

29.12.2014 17:17, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula virgulatamale. Determination confirmed D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

29.12.2014 17:04, Irina Nikulina:

No wonder doubt) However, the formAbraxas fulvobasalis- defined D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

29.12.2014 16:51, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea biselataIdentified D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

29.12.2014 16:47, Irina Nikulina:

Inurois fumosaDetermination confirmed D.Sc. Belyaev EA (BPI FEB RAS)

29.12.2014 16:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema sororcula / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

29.12.2014 16:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea rusticata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

29.12.2014 16:07, Basil Sergienko:

Eilema sororcula

29.12.2014 16:04, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea rusticata

29.12.2014 15:58, Irina Nikulina:

Already corrected, Svetlana. Photo # 3427 was redefined in October, and illustrations of the form is not removed, it happens)

29.12.2014 15:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphaenis sericata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

29.12.2014 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apoda limacodes / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.12.2014 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyphaenis sericata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

29.12.2014 13:30, Svetlana Shchavelina:

What is it in our pages and Actias artemis Actias gnoma the same photos on the splash screen ???

29.12.2014 12:29, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Oh ....... spoiled Malays Americans .........
I initially (a guest on a mountain at an altitude of almost where I did all my shooting, there is cold, brrr ....) gave a price for two 2-bed room for 6 nights --- 1200 USD
No hot water and no food items in attainable proximity ...

... And, no, the rooms were 4 beds, but since went 2 women and 2 men, for us they are 2-bed were ....the price does not affect the number of living ....

29.12.2014 12:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is nothing in Singapore. This urban island.
I was a guest in Sarawak for 6 people for 2 weeks (with meals) and trasfer Bao Kuching vystavid by 9200 US dollars == Non-Negotiable !!!. In Sarawak me perehotelos

29.12.2014 11:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes like everything is normal. This link is almost identical http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/12966716/fullscreen

29.12.2014 11:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Prompt - the more options, the better (in a personal best). In Sabah in Hestia Prices start from 120 ringgit but easily fell to 70 MR for two nights, on the condition that you live at least 5 days

29.12.2014 11:27, Svetlana Shchavelina:

In Sarawak, I was not (although the thought of him wandering in the head). Boas .... Sabah to a guest - and the price of the wild, we were told, lived not quite where he wanted initially, but inexpensive ... if need be in the future - tell me the address.
Well, the jungle - not the jungle and forest out there is ??? National Park?

29.12.2014 11:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis sappho / Alex Dumchus Neptis rivularis / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 11:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis sappho / Alex Dumchus Neptis rivularis / Irina Nikulina.

29.12.2014 11:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By the way, you are in Sarawak where they were (do not mean Kuching)? Something lomyat prices are higher than in Sabah in times of Hestia.

29.12.2014 11:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Guest-House (guest house). Jungle in Singapore do not)))

29.12.2014 11:15, Svetlana Shchavelina:

ABOUT! Thank you, good to be ready for it, that was not a surprise. Once I got used to that traveling around Southeast Asia live in the guest-house (try to write that word in Cyrillic came indecent) somewhere in the countryside close to the jungle. And we try to climb to the maximum on Forests, not to lose time for tourist entertainment.Therefore, always go to the familiar, the inhabitants of a particular region, which may be to mess and show.

29.12.2014 11:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

You will do vizu- make a cartoon. You will be able to drive to Johor Bahru in Malaysia and KL.

29.12.2014 11:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Visa problems are not like to do. 1600 rubles. Look online or call the embassy. Prices are higher than in Hong Kong, about Tai and Borneo, I do not speak even. Expensive housing. Decent hostel, not okraine- not less than 30 bucks per person (not dormitory). Inexpensive poest- little India, but for an amateur food.Metro- profitable to buy the card at the airport (like izilink called). Zoo (suitable) - 30 singodollarov (a minimum), trees Avatar - 32 SGD, Marina Bay Sands- climb to the top - 20 SGD (cheaper than the Ferris wheel and much better). Useful botsad- like free. Sentoza- if you like Parks razvlecheniy- so-so. Ocean Park in Hong Kong is much better.

29.12.2014 10:50, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Yeah .... And what about the prices? In Borneo, it was unpleasantly surprised by much higher prices than in Tae. And the food .... Of course, I want to hang out there for 5-6 days, this visa will have to do. In principle, there are friends there probably will ask to make an invitation ...

29.12.2014 8:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraximorpha davidii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.12.2014 8:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraximorpha davidii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.12.2014 8:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Abrota ganga / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.12.2014 8:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Abrota ganga / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.12.2014 8:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We must get to the book Base.

29.12.2014 8:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I was confused by jagged peaks. All my copies. They rounded.

29.12.2014 8:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Svetlana! Singapore was. And next year will be. But there are always 1-2 days. Especially there is not delayed, I do not want to get a visa, and transit of 96 hours without a visa.

29.12.2014 2:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis rivularis. With subspecies is unlikely to succeed. In the Far East, and the determinant in the internet there is, in addition Neptis rivularis bergmani Bryk other subspecies Neptis rivularis coenobita Stoll http://www.batt-ist.ru/b11_3.html/ The site's true reason neither one nor the other. Subspecies these authors have made no description? And what is the difference between these two subspecies is not found. About N. r. bergmani Bryk stated that the band is on the rear fenders wide and about 5 mm, but also N. r.coenobita Stoll judging by the snapshot is not too weak.

28.12.2014 19:46, Irina Nikulina:

It's not Sappho (Neptis rivularisIf Shamora - then most likely, Neptis rivularis bergmanni Bryk, 1942

28.12.2014 13:53, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Dmitry, and you've never been in Singapore ??? Something I spun sharply Singapore .......

28.12.2014 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Risoba obscurivialis / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.12.2014 11:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

28.12.2014 11:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

28.12.2014 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acrobasis consociella / Vitaly Gumenuk Zophodia grossulariella / Andrey Ponomarev.

28.12.2014 11:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Regarding the pass. Not Shamorsky and Shamorovsky Pass

28.12.2014 11:13, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

28.12.2014 10:59, Andrey Ponomarev:

In my opinion it Zophodia grossulariella

28.12.2014 3:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Il! I think you're right. I'm for option Neptis clinioides .Vot link http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Butterflies%20of%20China/07_Nymphalidae/06_Limenitidinae/Neptis%20clinioides/Neptis%20clinioides.htm
It seems like all one to one, a drawing, including the upper sash to the rear wing, which arcuate.

28.12.2014 1:10, Irina Nikulina:

According to the descriptions comesRisoba obscurivialis(color, features discal spots, form the boundaries of daylight. Bases. At the lower zone. Territory VC) http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/184_Risoba/Risoba%20obscurivialis/Risoba%20obscurivialis.htm

28.12.2014 0:30, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitry, and that confused? Maybe, if the color is softer as Svetlana says female asclepiades? You probably have in your collection? There's sort of just 3 females with such "windows", the selection is small. (Udiana But I have not seen) at the top of the VC mothsofborneo the female muluana such smoothed, embarrassed ... or is it drawn so inaccurate?

27.12.2014 22:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

no. neptisy not mine)))

27.12.2014 22:49, Irina Nikulina:

Why notNeptis clinioidesor soma? Both in China there. The first just in Sichuan. I was more than she seems. Dmitry, you are able to reliably distinguish between them? Somehow I do not really feel .. (

27.12.2014 20:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is sappho?

27.12.2014 14:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.12.2014 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudergolis wedah / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.12.2014 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudergolis wedah / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.12.2014 9:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Good

27.12.2014 8:50, Alex Dumchus:

Usually I do not set size, but if you have any questions relating to the type, please ...

27.12.2014 8:48, Alex Dumchus:

I am guided by their collector's items. I have a couple Chetverikova. In the evening, I try to give. Maybe it does not it?

27.12.2014 0:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! Regarding Chetverikova (Neptis tschetverikovi) By underside, it is in general easily distinguished from others. Kinds of lemmings. Look for example here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31370 .On rear fenders between Sc and R5 has two blue spots (you can say and strips) which are arranged one after the other. . Nor in any other. Species like lemmings not, in any case, we in the Far East, and China, too.According determinant lemming Chetverikova celebrated in China only in the north-vostoke.Otlichitelnuyu Chetverikova trait can be seen in the determinant LW T5, CH5, Figure 178-7, Page 296, and others. Lemmings too, if you want to of course.

26.12.2014 23:27, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitry and his check - avesta another, and elsewhere inhabit .. (By the way, was about to write here that China is more and Ariadne merione lives, at least copies. Of the province. Yunnan is on jpmoth)

26.12.2014 23:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lasippa heliodore (Fabricius,1787)

26.12.2014 23:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lasippa heliodore (Fabricius,1787)

26.12.2014 23:13, Svetlana Shchavelina:

It? http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/510246022

26.12.2014 23:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis ilos / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

26.12.2014 23:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis ilos / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

26.12.2014 23:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Let others check too.

26.12.2014 23:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

)))

26.12.2014 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Why can not tolerate?

26.12.2014 23:02, Irina Nikulina:

Well ... you could say that :)) I was not going) However, another definition I prefer :)) With the "meticulous" some association there :)))

26.12.2014 22:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is only 13 Moth of Borneo help

26.12.2014 22:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Meticulous Irina!)))

26.12.2014 22:44, Irina Nikulina:

Size I asked not specify exactly because of the complexities here, just saw that again without the size of trading in neopredel.postavleny. There is something just without question, a question mark is not accidentally blurted out there, like after a subspecies (there still like D. t. Moori), but did not have time to fix, time out)) And in general is very much needed size!

26.12.2014 22:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Neptis ilos sichuanensis with the underside when he

26.12.2014 22:37, Svetlana Shchavelina:

The same? http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/821096004

26.12.2014 22:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterodecta felderi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.12.2014 22:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Pterodecta felderi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.12.2014 22:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Daimio tethys / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.12.2014 22:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Daimio tethys / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.12.2014 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pterodecta felderi

26.12.2014 22:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

no options

26.12.2014 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pterodecta felderi

26.12.2014 22:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Abraximorpha davidii (Mabille, 1876)

26.12.2014 22:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It's broken life Abrota ganga Moore, 1857

26.12.2014 22:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ah me! It's Pseudergolis wedah

26.12.2014 22:04, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Similar: http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/12966716
Only my softer color ..........

26.12.2014 22:00, Alex Dumchus:

Some of amatuzy? From the kind of Enispe?

26.12.2014 21:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lethe helle

26.12.2014 21:46, Alex Dumchus:

37 mm

26.12.2014 21:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Neope pulaha

26.12.2014 21:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For China only Ariadne ariadne (Linnaeus, 1763) of this kind is. But I have not strong

26.12.2014 20:42, Irina Nikulina:

Daimio tethys ?

26.12.2014 20:07, Alex Dumchus:

Hmmm ... looks like they are, these neptis each other and can not be distinguished

26.12.2014 18:55, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander Chetverikov not sure if you want to later on all 4th-yellow WFD neptis differences can paint, and Yuri properly corrected himself - not exactly thisbe. Well it goes onNeptis ilosssp. sichuanensis Wang. But China is much more yellow neptis than in the RFE. Whether it is with the WFD, the choice would be small and would have said exactly ilos.But also other Chinese yellow neptis view ought to be at least close view Neptis themis, see later

26.12.2014 18:52, Alex Dumchus:

A Neptis tschetverikovi very similar. I am comparing collections, even more than trisbe

26.12.2014 16:25, Peter Khramov:

Basil, what are you zanudstvuesh. I do not have any "such" approach, it's time to really get used to, yeah - (.) (.)

26.12.2014 15:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Not thisbe. Sichuan is the closest to Western China. Then the option Neptis ilos

26.12.2014 15:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Hurried not hisbe. As determinant ET v.5, p.5., Figure 178-8, p. 296 turns Neptis ilos

26.12.2014 12:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis thisbe Ménétriés, 1859

26.12.2014 12:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis thisbe Ménétriés, 1859

26.12.2014 11:11, Basil Sergienko:

Types of genital well vary in females and molekulyarke (it's sort of the female). So it is difficult to see the differences, though, if you have a series of both and take into account written below, then assign a small probability of error is possible.1 Spreading (meaning luridata)
by Hausmann (GME 3) -Yug Russia, southern Urals and a point somewhere in the region of Tatarstan
by Sineva have 8,10,11 and regions.
Reliably whether the presence in the Moscow region.?

2 phenology
mucronata-early May -sredina June edichnye copies.or later are marked with an incomplete second generation or delayed development (requires further study, says Hausmann)
luridata-mid-June, the beginning of August (the south of the second generation)
It is understood that, depending on the conditions, the slight + -
Where sympatric fly, flies in the second 2-4 weeks later and almost never in sync.My mucronata-Boars 01.05 to 19.05, for females 15.5 22.05 (meaning good copies.)
luridata-04.06 at 11.06, with these I strained females yet.
There are males with Bukrina one year
m-01.05.01, l-04.06.01 (there are not flying because of copies.)

3 External signs
It is possible to take into account differences in the wing pattern, but they do not always work.
Males can be distinguished less by mustache

Wierzchołkowa część czułka samca z 11-12 członami pozbawionymi grzebykowatych wyrostków.-luridata-Long process 0.6-0.75 to 0.9 mm
Wierzchołkowa część czułka samca z 8-9 członami pozbawionymi grzebykowatych wyrostków-mucronata length 0.5-0.6

The first can be seen under normal binocular
Well, if you put a number, a sort of different butterflies, but it is difficult to describe the differences.

Considering the above said if the reliability in the presence of Defense is likely luridata

26.12.2014 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, if you consider this option, then maybe it's worth to remove the entire history of the site?
So it will not work (((
Photos here this material (other than a self-beetles) might be on the site in the expanded form:

Now, seriously, I think you should spread this approach ((((
It is also in 2014 ........

26.12.2014 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Attach can be any number to anyone, or pozdnota rannost irrelevant. Glitches are not on it.

25.12.2014 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

25.12.2014 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

25.12.2014 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, not for an hour, but permanently. Only need to mount a more "early" number to a "late"
For example # 100 # 101 is attached to, and not vice versa. You should get in this case)

25.12.2014 19:10, Andrey Kravtsov:

Or again, you need to do for an hour?

25.12.2014 19:08, Andrey Kravtsov:

Well, I do not try? This was done, but that it does not bind

25.12.2014 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Have now Copyright comments)

25.12.2014 18:20, Alexander Belousov:

It looks like the first photo in the network of this kind!

25.12.2014 17:43, Irina Nikulina:

Size? It is important.

25.12.2014 16:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think everything Scotopteryx mucronata, but I do not see any differences. Let Basil, confirm that there would be not to move here.

25.12.2014 16:35, Andrey Ponomarev:

Then it is necessary to move Scotopteryx mucronata

25.12.2014 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

25.12.2014 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Clostera curtula / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Clostera pigra / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

25.12.2014 14:21, Andrey Ponomarev:

Opa caught, it's Clostera pigra, especially on willow. :-)

25.12.2014 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scotopteryx luridata / Andrey Ponomarev Scotopteryx mucronata / Basil Sergienko.

25.12.2014 10:26, Andrey Ponomarev:

I agree with Vasily.

25.12.2014 0:32, Irina Nikulina:

Here are the questions and doubts have arisen. I looked the description and all the images that are available, and 15 species of the genus Adites. At least 9 of them belong to the so-called
bizonoides complex may be reliably identified using genital analysis. But it is possible to arbitrarily select 4 groups (type 2-3) included in the complex.For each group of species are characteristic external signs by which they can be distinguished from .Adites bizonoides. They are characterized by a hue axis. the color of the wings, or sling postbazalnoy form or shape and size of discal spot, or the size of adults. 5 of them are different from bizonoides well, and 3 - very slightly.So Adites curvata different from bizonoides only by the size of adults (curvata smaller) and Adites sandakan with Adites temburong bizonoides different from (and, correspondingly, from curvata) shape (more curved) and a little more intensity postbazalnoy sling, but between them are indistinguishable in appearance.On these two photos, as you peer into, the differences are significant not see (Either this is one kind, or have any other symptoms that are not described in the mothsofborneo, but that the author saw in the book The Moth of Borneo Book, for which he writes are being identified ..?

24.12.2014 18:40, Irina Nikulina:

But there are types of questions. In the evening, I try to write home about this race

24.12.2014 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Copies of different types as well?

24.12.2014 11:24, Shamil Murtazin:

And this is not the same as # 35791?

24.12.2014 1:43, Peter Khramov:

Another option box for your feedback. 30x40 glass, here are: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1906. 750 rubles to the recall, the amount in one hand without restrictions. City Delivery - as in the preceding sentence.

23.12.2014 20:25, Peter Khramov:

If odorodnogo background ambiguous question about the broader fields.

23.12.2014 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spartopteryx kindermannaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.12.2014 17:11, Irina Nikulina:

Well didstSpartopteryx kindermannaria
http://catocala.narod.ru/geom081.html
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=576238

23.12.2014 17:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, framing generous, do field a little wider.

23.12.2014 14:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

3. Some species migrate to the genera 1 2 and 3, and the race is 1.
This combination of old Rhode view appears in the "synonyms and kimbinatsiyah" (item 1,2,3)
4. If you change the type of the species, genus-old kombinnatsiya view appears in the "synonyms and combinations"
5. Rod transferred to another subfamily or family (not necessarily)

23.12.2014 13:42, Peter Khramov:

Correctly I understand that for a full curatorial Happiness should be:
1. To be able to rename birth
2. In order to merge two kinds one
Truncated?

23.12.2014 12:58, Peter Khramov:

Or remove tries. It is also an option.

23.12.2014 10:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Maxates inaptaria / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.12.2014 10:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil fixed the machine, do not see what has already corrected. it does not matter, let it be as it was, but so right. :)

23.12.2014 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

23.12.2014 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

23.12.2014 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

23.12.2014 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

23.12.2014 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis rivularis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.12.2014 9:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And the topic should be changed in "C coming season 2015"

23.12.2014 9:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis rivularis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.12.2014 5:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Papilio bianor / Imago / Olga Titova Papilio maackii / Female / Alex Dumchus.

22.12.2014 21:38, Irina Nikulina:

I thought so too. The femalePapilio maackiiat the top of HCC is very bright, blue-green spraying http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3147, including from flying in the southern district tries Sakhalin subspecies P. m. tutanus Fenton, [1882] http://www.thais.it/entomologia/farfalle/schede/sc_3.htm; It can be seen here. And bianora subspecies P. b. nakaharae (Matsumura, 1929), who lives on Sakhalin, only male on the LC is not a very dense dim green and blue spray http://catocala.narod.ru/pap18.html Or even in Sakhalin and others. subspecies have? But others - namely the blue, as Alexander writes.

22.12.2014 21:18, Alex Dumchus:

"More like a female P.maackii" - I explain why: First bianor usually darker, as if the blue than Maak (something between a dialis and maackii), and secondly, have shorter and considerably bianora fatter "tails" on their hind wings than in Maak.

22.12.2014 19:42, Peter Khramov:

I have since in NN never was. I'm not going. So, perhaps, at a meeting ought to bring them back to Vasili.

22.12.2014 19:20, Irina Nikulina:

At the same time would still detach and this fellow)

22.12.2014 19:16, Alexander Belousov:

I agree with Alexander, Neptis rivularis

22.12.2014 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

All 6 species Pandemis, living in 40 reg, revised again. At the same time, and I thought Pandemis 4 neighboring regions to look at just in case), but everywhere there are only five species - of the same. All 6 seaside well represented in the description and the figure in the Russian Far East to the insects, v.5, Part 3, pp. 156-157.In combination forms a dark basement area and its boundaries and form the outer boundary of the central dark areas (uneven, with the typical 2-3-bedroom terraced) + dark thin line from the corner of the bottom of the dark area, shade and weak reticulation at the top of the VC - nevertheless, I think , then dumetana. http://www.jpmoth.org/Tortricidae/Tortricinae/Pandemis_dumetana.html - photos anywhere much, but still give a reference to non-European dumetana.Sasha, what do you say? (Incidentally I had many questions for our Pandemis, voiced later))

22.12.2014 18:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Neptis rivularis, and what else could it be?

22.12.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is necessary that got rid :))

22.12.2014 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.12.2014 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.12.2014 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.12.2014 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.12.2014 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.12.2014 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.12.2014 17:35, Andrey Ponomarev:

And this photo is now tied Anacampsis populella

22.12.2014 17:32, Irina Nikulina:

Once again revised the photos and descriptions of seven species in Primorye. As well as a description (no photo) 8-th species - Choristoneura improvisana (to prevent it), which shows the features of the pattern of the wings that are different from that in the photo; In addition improvisana found only in the mountains, it is said, and in the definition. DV insects, v.5, part 3, page 142 ± "mountains - loach and green moss spruce", and others.East Kach - «bald mountain peaks and green moss-spruce forests» finally found the image Choristoneura evanidana, a cat. wrote in March and about which too had doubts http://bric.postech.ac.kr/species/insect/insect_detail.php?nId=Lep-007-00027 also looked forage plants for both species. Yuri found houses with caterpillars in the ash (Fraxinus), which is specified in the definition. DV insects in the top five host plants for diversana not specified for evanidana.Now with more reason to think that thereChoristoneura diversana

22.12.2014 17:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

22.12.2014 17:14, Andrey Ponomarev:

I bind photo editing and again glitch attached copper-butterfly Cupido osiris.
Miracles and only.
Probably such glitches have to abandon the peg.

22.12.2014 16:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Where Akrei by Basil?

22.12.2014 12:46, Alex Dumchus:

More like a female P.maackii

22.12.2014 12:29, Peter Khramov:

As for the blog is right to kicking.

22.12.2014 8:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

22.12.2014 8:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

21.12.2014 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Officially closed the 2014 season: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=552967&view=findpost&p=1522373
I think that next season will be even more prosperous :)
Peter and I actually hoped for a promise to blog ....
But nonetheless. With the upcoming season of 2015)))

21.12.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, well, it really difficult :)
1) Open your LC.
2) Drives a number Photo underside where you top photo (swept in red):

3) Press the "Refresh Data"
And yet, the group will be connected :)

21.12.2014 19:14, Andrey Kravtsov:

The underside # 36594

21.12.2014 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kirinia eversmanni / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

21.12.2014 14:28, Alexander Belousov:

Kirinia eversmanni

21.12.2014 0:28, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, apparently, the then and the view was written in Latin in the file name.

21.12.2014 0:11, Peter Khramov:

Autosubstitution will only if write subtype field type. If clarification - will not.

20.12.2014 23:26, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, of course, Sasha. Just when once at startup to fill the line with the subspecies, sometimes turns to Auto-sight with the definition of Vladimir ... already happened (. Now waiting for transfer, then I was finishing subspecies.

20.12.2014 22:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colias erate / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.12.2014 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, subspecific name I can not load, it is necessary from a page of Vladimir.

20.12.2014 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis camilla / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.12.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura metis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.12.2014 22:03, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura metis ssp. substituta Butler, 1873

20.12.2014 22:02, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis camilla ssp. japonica Menetries, 1857

20.12.2014 22:02, Irina Nikulina:

Colias erate ssp.poliographus Motschulsky, 1860

20.12.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycophotia porphyrea Dichagyris signifera.

20.12.2014 13:24, Basil Sergienko:

No, of course is Dichagyris signifera, very hard to believe that so defined before

20.12.2014 12:09, Andrey Ponomarev:

And that's exactly Lycophotia porphyrea?

20.12.2014 9:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Euploea midamus chloe Guerin-Meneville,1843 http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30350010.html

20.12.2014 9:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Euploea midamus chloe (Guerin-Meneville, 1843

19.12.2014 23:18, Andrey Kravtsov:

Peter, you can remove the old.

19.12.2014 22:51, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Upload a photo Coscinia cribraria with the size height 768. All of the old.

19.12.2014 22:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The underside is needed

19.12.2014 22:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zanykal bastard

19.12.2014 21:17, Peter Khramov:

If square then 768h768 or less.

19.12.2014 19:00, Alexander Belousov:

As for the steps - sorry! Opened in normal prosmotrovike- them just do not have. It turned out to curve vindovyh, there. And I myself chose razmeru- 800x800, while maintaining the proportions. And then in 1024, you can!

19.12.2014 18:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melese dorothea / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.12.2014 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ah, would pour all the photos of Constantine to clickable were ....

19.12.2014 17:59, Peter Khramov:

Steps I, frankly, do not watch, but the issue of the deterioration of the image after the upload has been raised. Pinch the site engine picture quality settings although there and set high. It will be solved, but in the meantime if you want, we can ship them to a site in 1024 max. in width and 768 max. height.If Fota will not go beyond that, then it will be squeezed only in smaller sizes, and Krupnyakov - not (or rather, scale). This picture does not have to be exactly 1024x768 pixels., The proportions can be any. The main thing - do not get out of the 1024 wide and 768 high.

19.12.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melese dorothea / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.12.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ennomomima fallax / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.12.2014 17:26, Alexander Belousov:

When loading on site, after the imposition of the watermark, the picture squeezed 3 times. And in this picture Menno noticeable gradient steps. Possible color changes from a mask watermark.

19.12.2014 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you :) I add the geography of the Old :)
All of the new born and the first views of this kind on the site)))

19.12.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And you, Peter did not give these Akrey else?
I told him in August, three handed to you when your beetles Borneo he took away :)

19.12.2014 16:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

You're my Acraea with Ethiopia importantly no one to give away.)))

19.12.2014 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitri, for cooking, they do not need? I'll give a good hands to establish the truth :)
And then spread, spread ...... And most genital appear (((
And most scales boil once against the grain. I Zhuchist in the world. And the priority for me long-horned beetles beetles and borers.These groups, representatives of which, in most cases to determine the cooking does not require :)

19.12.2014 16:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Mustilizans hepatica / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.12.2014 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Mustilizans hepatica / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.12.2014 15:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I got to a computer finally :)
Alexander, I've been with both hands for the establishment of its kind in Bombycidae and I think that belonging to the genus Endromidae is still "up in the air" :)
Outwardly, when placed next to the example of ourEndromis versicoloraand this fellow - nothing, moreover,that both 4 Wing (paraphrased Zolotukhin))
No wonder the Asian sites they Bombycidae (though in a sort Mustilia more)
http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/80_BOMBYCOIDEA/05_BOMBYCIDAE/framepage%20Bombycidae.html
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/bombycidae/bombycidae_7_1.php
Yes, and here is kind of in Bombycidae:
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/search/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=18730.0&&
Natural History Museum, London - prestigious organization and are in no hurry to race in Endromidae translate :)
We have to do in the race Mustilizans BOMBYCOIDEA: BOMBYCIDAE, relying on them.And there is one kind, particularly under this picture (other species on the website yet). And what happened to him then it will be necessary to make a show time :)

19.12.2014 12:54, Peter Khramov:

The effect is amusing, boom understand. Clamp could, but the color has gone - this is strange ... Although this page for me so more natural looking than at the present you the link, but you still need to understand.

19.12.2014 12:52, Peter Khramov:

If there was infa advance that will be a couple of pieces of 700 - I would have told you kanesh.

19.12.2014 12:51, Peter Khramov:

Et I recall. You just work somewhere Tama was, I thought, we can, not far. Oh well, more choice of good and different.

19.12.2014 12:34, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Peter, I'm not a big expert in Photoshop and use only a few sliders.
But what happens to the image uploaded to the site, I do not know.
Take a look at the same picture to other resources and compare:
http://savepic.org/6632318.jpg

19.12.2014 8:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you for reasonable assurance. :)

19.12.2014 8:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyclene obscurilinea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.12.2014 8:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I could not send to the pins?

19.12.2014 8:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm better at Gorky. I live in the upper part, 15 minutes from pehom Pokrovka.

19.12.2014 1:05, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, I think, can be moved, you're right identified asLyclene obscurilinealooked descriptions of both species on mothsofborneo.com, there are very clear distinguishing features. Because there is a good image Lyclene mesilaulinea here http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/24_Lyclene/Lyclene%20mesilaulinea/Lyclene%20mesilaulinea.htm It can be compared.The main differences - more subtle brown pattern at mesilaulinea, in the basal zone of the VC at it for more than 2 lines (at obscurilinea only 2) and postbazalnaya band is strongly curved to vnutr.krayu VC and bones (unlike the smooth at obscurilinea)

19.12.2014 1:03, Peter Khramov:

There are boxes on the test / review, here are: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1977. I can send two people for the price of 700 pe. Until Monday exactly true, then - let's see. One box in one hand. If you need more - is at the regular price. Test box - only for delivery in Moscow, St. Petersburg, N.Novgorod, Kazan, Yekaterinburg, Vladimir, Tver, Izhevsk, Cheboksary, as well as some settlements respective areas. Write here or in the mail, call the phone.

19.12.2014 0:48, Peter Khramov:

Wow. That seems to have Photoshop and everywhere, and still think, that it could not shoot Canon. That's funny.

18.12.2014 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Well, how could you think that? .. Well this is a living testimony of your stay at the site for at least four years is almost w.
ZY The pins will be tomorrow at Gorky. In the future - HH opens a new fast PVZ not far from the station. m. Lenin (str. Rubo). One may be more convenient, if in 2015 all urgent question remains.

18.12.2014 22:33, Irina Nikulina:

There are two closely related speciesMaxates korintjiensisandMaxates inaptaria.
Distinctive features in the description on mothsofborneo to the korintjiensis - long tails ZK slightly sickle curved apex VC thin flat red line along the edges of the wings having a muffled, a bit dark-green color, a sling and discal spots neotchёtlivye, fringe cream. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/41_Maxates/Maxates%20korintjensis/Maxates%20korintjensis_070910915.jpg
Descriptions of inaptaria on mothsofborneo not, because Geography available for this species - the Himalayas. Identified only difference - slightly curved corners apekalnye VC from korintjiensis . But boldsystems.org copy of inaptaria just from Thailand. If you compare the photo with copies to boldsystems, then, perhaps, closer even inaptaria
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxon=Maxates%20korintjiensis
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxon=Maxates%20inaptaria

18.12.2014 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew, try to link the two in a group of your photos.

18.12.2014 21:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Doxocopa laurentia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

18.12.2014 21:51, Andrey Kravtsov:

It is necessary to drag the underside №36393

18.12.2014 21:50, Andrey Kravtsov:

Peter, drag here ispod №36396?

18.12.2014 21:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Andrey Kravtsov Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2014 21:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

maybe it's a photo in the furnace?

18.12.2014 21:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

maybe it's a photo in the furnace?

18.12.2014 20:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Epipristis nelearia / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.12.2014 16:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

After answering all Zolotukhin complicated. :)
If new parvilam, the Endromidae, and if you think in Bombycidae.
While the curators there, Basil decides where :)

18.12.2014 16:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here I agree :). If you refer to someone, by Epipristis nelearia, in imprecise.

18.12.2014 16:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is need resolution. Epipristis nelearia smaller Pingasa lariaria.

18.12.2014 16:21, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitri, have lariaria silnozubchatye dark external sling, and it is given as the main difference. sign; this is confusing. I would venture to suggest something quite differentEpipristis neleariaNote the shape of the white edge bond of BK. Dark areas (maroon) are of varying intensity, including Just noticeable and such like in this photo.
http://www.quazoo.com/q/Epipristis_nelearia
http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=69029&spec_id=KHC-6796D%201279138810&meta=&image=www.boldsystems.org/pics/KHCGE/KHC-6796D+1279138810.jpg

18.12.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Risoba glauca / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

18.12.2014 16:18, Andrey Kravtsov:

Yes, all from the same batch

18.12.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Risoba glauca / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

18.12.2014 16:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://abdb-africa.org/repository/repoPrev/Euphaedra_ceres_female_verso_m.jpg
and
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/46/Euphaedra_phaethusa_Ahozon_2012-01-22_uns.jpg

18.12.2014 16:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Risoba sp. then I would have no cooking would not risk

18.12.2014 16:07, Peter Khramov:

For inaccurate too little of information, I understand correctly? Ie can be uncertain to carry at all?

18.12.2014 16:05, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you! The most popular high-quality work!

18.12.2014 16:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

18.12.2014 15:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Antanartia delius / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2014 15:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Antanartia delius (Drury, 1782)

18.12.2014 15:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Also African without labels?

18.12.2014 15:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pieriballia viardi / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus Not identified.

18.12.2014 15:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieriballia viardi / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

18.12.2014 15:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

18.12.2014 15:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Pingasa tapungkanana / Confidently identified / John Moore / 2010-09-08 00:00:00 Not identified / 0000-00-00 00:00:00.

18.12.2014 14:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male Euphaedra phaethusa, all right

18.12.2014 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

This version looks nicer :)

18.12.2014 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Basil Sergienko.

18.12.2014 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.12.2014 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia sophia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.12.2014 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.12.2014 14:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

If the question in one form, I listed it (if Zolotukhin tell where, but it is nowhere :))
Peter modifies the interface of subgenera and above, and it will go on the back burner issue. Curators will work with one hand, even though the right.
I have already said that we have all that quickly, then postponed several times because a hurry.But only a little you start to look closely, immediately and climb neponyatki. And most do not want to boil the pot, and it encouraged other.

18.12.2014 13:43, Basil Sergienko:

Eupithecia sophia-male, female previously opredelennaya-

18.12.2014 13:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I would call it Pingasa lariaria (Walker, 1860)

18.12.2014 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Please Dumchusu Alexander and Dmitry Pozhogin. Deal with this race. :)). Alexander let the lower side in all their forms. What you could at least from what the dance. With our definitions of all African monkeys laugh. :)))

18.12.2014 13:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Species that there stoyat- like I have difficulty in determining not called. I do not remember, but cooked just like light. Work items (the series) is still there - if necessary, cook. Hemorrhoids was a native Cleora

18.12.2014 13:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cook! Genital differences!

18.12.2014 13:06, Peter Khramov:

I do not know how things are. For supraspecific taxa yet You did not do as well without it znams, run the interface as a whole or not. Probably, all the same run.

18.12.2014 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Illustrate, no? ..

18.12.2014 12:09, Irina Nikulina:

She asked, because to deal with relatives rubimontana - rubicunda - tapungkanana and confused here this greenish tapungkanana http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21076. Does not agree she somehow no description on mothsofborneo, no photo. You have this kind probably have in your collection?

18.12.2014 10:36, Peter Khramov:

Excess poudalyal. As for geography, I think, everything is understood.

18.12.2014 9:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Now you need to remove all these photos with boxes

18.12.2014 9:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Only then the peppered moth, like a NIGMI not defined.

18.12.2014 8:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Also scoop here and there of the leaf.

18.12.2014 3:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and one more question. As we have the situation with the addition of taxa?
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/36574 There's definitely 100%
I generally tend to trust the determination of a man who described himself in 2007, some species of this genus.
For example: Mustilizans predicta Zolotuhin, 2007 and Mustilizans andracoides Zolotuhin, 2007 :)
It remains only podshlifovat where it is better to add, but the question I think will be resolved in the near future :)

18.12.2014 2:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Small tripod with swivel mount camera with backlight poshamanil. Well, a piece of foam glued flipcharts :)
And you can even shoot a shabby soap box like mine (no full manual settings), or small things, dimension Cyana Barsine. By the way: there is not only the mother bear, but also Aganainae :)

18.12.2014 2:24, Peter Khramov:

Well, entered in any taxon there is a subfamily, and you will subfamily. The tea they were not mulon.

18.12.2014 0:38, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitry and Pingasa all defined?)

18.12.2014 0:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

shit in the sense that the species are in alphabetical order and not by subfamilies

18.12.2014 0:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Bullshit in catalog

18.12.2014 0:27, Irina Nikulina:

In general, there is an additional - "Keys to insects of the Far East of Russia: 6 m. Additional analysis is .. Fauna and general index of names" - Vladivostok, 2011. - 552 p. I have a PDF-File. If you want to send.

18.12.2014 0:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

18.12.2014 0:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vlad Proklov Alexandr Zhakov.

18.12.2014 0:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Homoeosoma nimbella / Tentatively identified / Vlad Proklov.

18.12.2014 0:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

18.12.2014 0:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Homoeosoma nimbella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.12.2014 0:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Homoeosoma nimbella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.12.2014 0:12, Peter Khramov:

I will be in HH - invites shoot yeah -) Since Stas Now you do not have.

18.12.2014 0:10, Peter Khramov:

Bullshit bullshit in the catalog or in the blue?

18.12.2014 0:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

have blue pick

17.12.2014 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

There's an additional fact was supposed to be.

17.12.2014 23:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

According to African :)))

17.12.2014 23:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Specialist-was I?))) I do in cabbage rolls do not understand anything)))

17.12.2014 23:49, Irina Nikulina:

Where is the smiley face "embarrassment" :)))? "Fighter" is pleased that the expert confirmed the result nekorotkih searches - so no wonder!

17.12.2014 23:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Boxes of Borneo shoot moths will not)))

17.12.2014 23:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Irina, as usual, well done. A geography cut off after 1969 described species.

17.12.2014 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Telipna kigoma Telipna sanguinea.

17.12.2014 23:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Telipna kigoma / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.12.2014 23:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Telipna sanguinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.12.2014 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

See impossible - to what do you want all this perefotografirovat !! :))) You can even hand-G16-th :) (Not once since rented copies. Collection of Vladivostok, obtained excellent) A general business Sasha says. Sorry, Dmitry, you are far away, you would be filmed with great pleasure)

17.12.2014 23:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I did not see. Evpitetsii painted in a single volume, but nothing more.

17.12.2014 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

There must be an additional determinant of how DV of moths, but I do not have it for some reason, probably his in nature?

17.12.2014 23:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

bullshit.

17.12.2014 23:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

After insistence Irina and Andrei work to give the only correct definition Telipna sanguinea sanguinea (Plötz, 1880)

17.12.2014 23:31, Peter Khramov:

In other words, http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog, then we choose the moths and allocate the needed regions of Russia. And forward.

17.12.2014 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cigaritis syama / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

17.12.2014 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cigaritis syama / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

17.12.2014 23:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

After you put the camera on a table- more dark forest.
)))

17.12.2014 23:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cigaritis syama

17.12.2014 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, and you're hands are not photographed. Put the camera on the table. Maximum aperture close, put the camera in front of a piece of foam is more, it can drape than like a butterfly slide it perpendicular to the surface of the table, give light, set the shutter speed at least a minute, the timer is in focus, and shoot.I was surprised what happens.

17.12.2014 22:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Small sfotat I could not (I Krivorukov this) and therefore put)))

17.12.2014 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

In Sineva

17.12.2014 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

:))) Handsomely

17.12.2014 22:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is there a list moths Far East Russia?

17.12.2014 22:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Bear Borneo

17.12.2014 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There underside asked Alexander :) Headache with them, really (

17.12.2014 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

The site under Euphaedra ceres, who do not understand, but not E. ceres. I can of course be wrong, I do not understand them, but not those at the top that says: "Not"

17.12.2014 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

And this is in my opinion Euphaedra ravola. How do you define them?

17.12.2014 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And maybe the same thing: "Common ceres forester Euphaedra phaethusa ":
https://www.flickr.com/photos/41838821@N05/11805647923/
Hardly understand it all :)
P.S. Alexander the, E. ceres is on the site and poforme wings in my time there as a female: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21427

17.12.2014 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

In my opinion it is the female Euphaedra ceres

17.12.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, Owned this difficult. So I do not become podverzhdaet button. It remains to hope for sellers to e-bay :)
And that's something which has ephedra for the link, I brought yesterday in the medicine cabinet: http://abdb-africa.org/ good site.

17.12.2014 21:32, Andrey Kravtsov:

I do not argue

17.12.2014 21:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, and where do you watch them? I get into it do not hunt, but must Andrey :))

17.12.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This copies. with a high probability phaetusa is. The underside was very helpful. How is it to be proved.
As for the second copy. and I have great doubts.

17.12.2014 21:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would say that they are different species. Large differences in the picture, even if it is male and female.

17.12.2014 21:03, Andrey Kravtsov:

The battery is dead right on the ispode.Vsego .Poluchite

17.12.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Butterfly is in the admin panel :)
Please add the kind of Mustilizans JK Yang, 1995 and this kind:
Mustilizans hepatica (Moore, 1879) .

17.12.2014 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Alexander, repeat. Aesthetic pleasure from images.

17.12.2014 17:36, Peter Khramov:

I catch the word!

17.12.2014 16:36, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, Dmitri, thank you, I, too, yesterday to get to the bottom of this review, even wanted to give a link here, but then esteemed for new species (after 1969) and realized that nothing is clear, descriptions of some not .. and did not.

17.12.2014 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The next time will be the specifics :) Follow me not deposits if necessary :)

17.12.2014 15:57, Peter Khramov:

So I'm talking about then. More specifics!

17.12.2014 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry concretized what I wanted to say. Perhaps you noticed that the definition of this type, I did not verify At the same time, those where there is a confirmed underside.

17.12.2014 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Basil, Well have to throw unfounded allegations. Never say never. And there they still ... Judge not, that ye be not judged.
ZY Andrew, if you can upload underside.

17.12.2014 15:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lamproptera curius / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.12.2014 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lamproptera curius / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.12.2014 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gnopharmia stevenaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.12.2014 15:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Here you can still see it, but without a sense of geography little atbutterflies.com/downloads/lycaenidae_pentilina.doc

17.12.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paratalanta cultralis / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.12.2014 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.12.2014 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.12.2014 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.12.2014 14:29, Irina Nikulina:

:) And while single in females, please, this and 2 more pictures of the form

17.12.2014 14:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and I do not mind !!!

17.12.2014 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

So far, the site has two types, we assume that they are really two. :)

17.12.2014 13:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parnassius delphius fly too dark and light in one meadow, but this does not become "poluvidami." Here genanaliz just would have helped.

17.12.2014 13:08, Irina Nikulina:

When versed with views, a lot of things to read in this issue, too, was interesting - there are different opinions on this subject), Dmitry, and you work Lorkovika, though long-standing, not read? Lorcovic Z "The genetics and reproductive isolating mechanisms of the pieris napi-brionae group" (1962) http://images.peabody.yale.edu/lepsoc/jls/1960s/1962/1962-16%282%29105-Lorkovic. pdf Summary He's just about it, and concludes - calls brionae form, which is not a complete stage of speciation in P.napi, and offers to call it semispecies. His assumption - there is this form under the influence of more severe climatic conditions. In Kurentsova - "However, the existence of both forms of P. napi in the same environmen.conditions and their simultaneous occurrence suggests that in this case we are dealing with two genetically determined forms, which are not yet on the path of ecological and geographical isolation. " Since then much water has flowed) But in today's papers opinions diverge.

17.12.2014 12:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema nise / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.12.2014 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Anthophilopsis baphialis, but not quite all converge, probably another Turkish appearance, but neither of which I can not find.

17.12.2014 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now their sources added. From there, the data can inspire us.

17.12.2014 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Parnassius apollo.

17.12.2014 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

17.12.2014 8:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema nise (Cramer, [1775])

17.12.2014 8:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.12.2014 8:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius apollo / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.12.2014 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Rekoa meton / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.12.2014 8:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Rekoa meton / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.12.2014 8:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Genital types are the same. Some sources is only for the high mountains. By the way, almost all in the north of NADI / Briony dark or very dark. For all these reasons, it seems to me that this is simply a form of kvazimelanisticheskaya due to low temperatures or high mountains of the northern climate.

17.12.2014 2:37, Irina Nikulina:

Parses a year ago at the same time and dulcinea melete, if briefly - that males napi, especially 2-3 generations, it's hard to distinguish from males bryoniae.But females bryoniae painted usually much darker, much of the PC covered with gray or gray-brown coating, particularly very dusty at the root, background wings - yellow, yellowish-white (in some subspecies - rich yellow) along the veins of both wings - plentiful brownish shade.On the underside from napi spraying veins of gray-greenish, while bryoniae - brown or dark gray. (Although there are some subspecies napi (adalwinda and lappona, for example), the females of which painted darker and is more difficult to distinguish from bryoniae). But the network is full of pictures, well represented here http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Pieris_Bryoniae views and differences of all registered.
By the way, and just then the female.

16.12.2014 23:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rekoa meton (Cramer, 1779)

16.12.2014 23:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rekoa meton (Cramer, 1779)

16.12.2014 23:27, Irina Nikulina:

http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/2313694#page/11/mode/1up sheets with illustrations copied, flip, increased everyone can understand) + especially marked in the text.

16.12.2014 23:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Irina! The sources do not. Even descriptions, especially 2005 available. A reference to the audit can lose?

16.12.2014 23:13, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, Dmitri, I agree that the review part, I only contributed one well-matched version of widespread species from the set described. You decide where to put, and put there. Where to see the newly described species not know was looking for. If there is a source - tell me, please.

16.12.2014 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, in 8 to Sinev 3 species: L. morsei; L. reali and L. sinapis (in DoD, particularly the latter two) :)
It may already perekolbasili and reali Now juvernica: I do not know ((As with beetles: we had before Osmoderma eremita, and recently he became Osmoderma barnabita (analogy spent) :)
And if the underside does not help then they rule .... genitals or inaccurate sinapis to put it (the exterior is well suited).

16.12.2014 23:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The underside race without Euphaedra almost indefinable.

16.12.2014 22:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

who are willing to properly explain the differences Pieris bryoniae and napi?

16.12.2014 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris bryoniae / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

16.12.2014 22:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I almost caught at this point only Leptidea sinapis, but all can be. ispod not help

16.12.2014 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

L. reali in Italy you do Leptidea juvernica :))
and the underside I think will not help here.

16.12.2014 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

An audit in 1969? After that, a bunch of species described.

16.12.2014 22:38, Irina Nikulina:

The revision is given a detailed description of 26 species and subspecies of 8 illustrations. They differ in the number of good, size, arrangement of white spots on the VC and NC, configuration and size of the dark zones and the boundaries between the red and black zones (crimp number of projections).On set - picture VC - picture NC - Size - Select only one option (of a drawing in line 2, but the second type has a wingspan of 56-60mm) This maleTelipna sanguineaview is widespread mainly in Nigeria, Cameroon Congo, Uganda. I must say that the existing online photo top and underside sanguinea - photo of the female, it differs from the male.Just different and subspecies T. s. bistrigata, which also has a photo

16.12.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside is needed to all butterflies. And if copies. collection means to provide photo underside will not be difficult.

16.12.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, then you have to underside if there are other types :) On it easier to identify.
We have something like L. reali still there, but my theory, or close to that. Thus, the choice is small :)

16.12.2014 22:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, Alexander wrote like, it's like the other two species. :))

16.12.2014 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If others do not it. I looked before her, suburban and mentally put on the male sinapis, but kind of afraid to write because of the geography just. You, Alexander as living in Kazakhstan and the cards in your hand :)

16.12.2014 21:18, Alexander Belousov:

Pieris bryoniae ♀

16.12.2014 21:13, Alexander Belousov:

Leptidea sinapis - at us like no other.

16.12.2014 21:08, Peter Khramov:

Pasib, cool stuff. It is necessary to them druzhitstsa.

16.12.2014 21:04, Peter Khramov:

What for?

16.12.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Database on African Rhopalocera: http://abdb-africa.org/

16.12.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2014 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2014 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We must underside of the instance.

16.12.2014 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2014 18:16, Eugene Davkaev:

In the book, The Butterflies of Dzungar, Tien Shan, Alai and Eastern Pamir, v. 1, p. 76 in this region noted dwelling ssp. glaucopis Bryk & Eisner, 1934.

16.12.2014 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.12.2014 17:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius apollo / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.12.2014 17:49, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, I had in mind a more specific indication of the country. Africa is big)) And I totally agree about the importance of labels. That's just not clear - we sort of do not let nikak- either orally or in any prescribed rules - statement on the website bezetiketochnyh copies.(only wishes write)), but it will not identify? But then why would there be these photos - as an element of decor? :) Either the rules - a taboo on bezetiketochnye, or - to determine, if possible, adding gallery) of this butterfly is quite determinable tables and descriptions, given that the size specified, the underside and the top there.

16.12.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leptidea sp. We must underside.

16.12.2014 16:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Choristoneura lafauryana / Alexandr Zhakov Choristoneura diversana / Irina Nikulina.

16.12.2014 16:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Choristoneura lafauryana / Alexandr Zhakov Choristoneura diversana / Irina Nikulina.

16.12.2014 16:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No etiketki- not figs and wonder.

16.12.2014 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, we will see who since late summer :)

16.12.2014 16:05, Yuri Semejkin:

No, Alexander. Photographed on the street, some people still flies at this time.

16.12.2014 15:39, Irina Nikulina:

Just kind of Telipna. There is a detailed overview «A revision of the genus Telipna Aurivillius» (by Thomas Herbert Elliot Jackson), which describes all kinds of (30) (but in English). Cursorily looked - at least 10 species with a similar pattern. You can probably exclude some, knowing wingspan, and then look in more detail. Please try again later. With geography in any way? The review is given to the types of details.

16.12.2014 15:12, Andrey Ponomarev:

I Crepe photo editing and photo Vasin stuck themselves, This is a bug.
Where is there still such.

16.12.2014 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, you are not in October, more than a dozen tortrices can fly, and even less ... or is it the lead-out?

16.12.2014 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula marginepunctata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.12.2014 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius apollonius / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.12.2014 8:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Theretra alecto / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.12.2014 8:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)))

16.12.2014 8:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

The photo Nola squalida, how determined Vlad Proklov.
Nola desmotes - Australian animal. :)

16.12.2014 8:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

16.12.2014 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.12.2014 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gunda ochracea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.12.2014 8:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parnassius apollo / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

16.12.2014 8:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euphaedra ruspina / Tentatively identified / Andrey Kravtsov Not identified.

16.12.2014 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euphaedra ruspina / Tentatively identified / Andrey Kravtsov Not identified.

16.12.2014 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Can copper-butterfly genus Telipna?

16.12.2014 8:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is easily determined, but without etiketki- will not.

16.12.2014 0:26, Irina Nikulina:

I forgot to write - male http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/bombycidae/bombycidae_2_1.php

15.12.2014 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, who in the photo? Overlooking decided?

15.12.2014 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Abbreviation "DRC" in the geography is correct on the "Democratic Republic of Congo" , or simply "Congo" : https://ru.wikipedia.org / wiki / Demokraticheskaya_Respublika_Kongo
So everything will be clearer :)

15.12.2014 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 22:47, Alex Dumchus:

A satyr is not it?

15.12.2014 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Archaeoprepona meander megabates (Fruhstorfer, 1916)

15.12.2014 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 22:20, Irina Nikulina:

Gunda ochracea http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/80_BOMBYCOIDEA/05_BOMBYCIDAE/02_Gunda/Gunda%20ochracea/Gunda%20ochracea.htm Well it differs from other species of the genus

15.12.2014 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you're the former recover first. And then we will think about it and.
By the way: More and interface to unleash obscure groups - a hot topic. Today, for example formed another: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3120
It is necessary and this mess to do something (

15.12.2014 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 21:27, Peter Khramov:

OK got it. I think we should be zabatsat news section on the website, news entomology, not site itself (as now done). Perhaps there ought to able to write all moderators / Find Topics Find Topics Power, but one should be the main editor or something like that. Basil, you do not want to try?

15.12.2014 21:16, Andrey Kravtsov:

Well, thank you, though!

15.12.2014 21:15, Alex Dumchus:

C is a fright ruspina ??? Rather, it is one of Acraea!

15.12.2014 21:11, Andrey Kravtsov:

Perhaps Junonia gregorii?

15.12.2014 21:08, Andrey Kravtsov:

No, Junonia iphita The shape of the rear wing is not the .Skoree Junonia gregorii of Ugandy.Dayu ispod.Etiketki no .Voobsche it's a bit darker, I had to add layers to show image

15.12.2014 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I think there is a glitch site all the same. LC because we have different Andrew and snap pictures of others to their technically impossible in my opinion :)

15.12.2014 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is probably Andrew, something not pointed out was not there before them binding.

15.12.2014 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Anywhere I did not join. Especially was charged Pts long time (Moth 2002 collection) and geese sfotat in 2014.
It really see a glitch.

15.12.2014 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia oenone / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.

15.12.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Camouflage is a camouflage :) But where in this group of my moth Abraxas grossulariata?

15.12.2014 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia oenone / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.

15.12.2014 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Gluck some to caterpillars Cucullia artemisiae tied.

15.12.2014 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, why are you a stranger to her caterpillars join?

15.12.2014 19:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Somewhere I have admired a good camouflage that gusyanki :)

15.12.2014 19:16, Andrey Kravtsov:

Wingspan 40 mm, very similar to Euphaedra ruspina, but the shape of the rear wings and the number of white dots sovpadaet.Kto not something in the subject?

15.12.2014 18:03, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 18:02, Alex Dumchus:

Parnassius apollo, ... but it does not define one? All CITES fear :-)?

15.12.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Doxocopa laurentia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.12.2014 17:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noreppa chromus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.12.2014 17:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudacraea semire / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

15.12.2014 17:40, Alex Dumchus:

Noreppa chromus

15.12.2014 17:36, Alex Dumchus:

Doxocopa laurentia

15.12.2014 17:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew has more than once that he had a lot of butterflies, without labels. Where the label is, it exposes. :)

15.12.2014 17:27, Alex Dumchus:

Junonia iphita? need labels

15.12.2014 17:24, Alex Dumchus:

Pseudacraea semire

15.12.2014 17:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.12.2014 17:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.12.2014 17:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.12.2014 17:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.12.2014 17:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.12.2014 17:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.12.2014 16:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.12.2014 16:21, Andrey Kravtsov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 16:21, Andrey Kravtsov: This species is identified correctly.

15.12.2014 16:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Kravtsov Alexander Belousov.

15.12.2014 16:12, Alexander Belousov:

Andrew delicious uё in conjunction with the number 36445, and will be wonderful.

15.12.2014 16:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Kravtsov Alexander Belousov.

15.12.2014 16:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dolicharthria punctalis / Tentatively identified / Ozgur Kocak.

15.12.2014 15:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caradrina clavipalpis / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

15.12.2014 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree.

15.12.2014 10:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

I digress from the topic will tell anecdote:
The girl that you drink it?
What is?
Alcohol, vodka, moonshine.
Oh, I do not know. Everything is delicious. :))
Everywhere a lot of work. Required Coleophoridae, still the family. completely at odds. In Europe, one thing we have another, how will. :)))
Also could budworm - Europe, scoops Europe, moth all Europe.What is the micro small family. But with time, I do not know.

15.12.2014 9:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

The grounds for the transfer was not.

15.12.2014 9:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apatura ilia / Yuriy Karpov Apatura metis / Irina Nikulina.

15.12.2014 7:31, Peter Khramov:

Okay, look. Alexander, write what you take as a group facilitator.

14.12.2014 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Something like this, I slammed the two species names interchangeably, they are different lineages, they had to move to another family Amseliphora. eventually no Coleophora coronillae Zeller 1849 or Razowskia coronillae (Zeller, 1849). I made a mistake.
1 action Coleophora coronillae was replaced on the parent Amseliphora
2. action to Razowskia coronillae added Amseliphora coronillae, seeing that it was necessary to reverse. I open a page Amseliphora coronillae earlier put the number is already united Razowskia coronillae.as a result of blank page.
Updating page Razowskia coronillae also a blank page.
Re-view is not created. Pulls them back :)))

14.12.2014 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.12.2014 22:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm talking about the sources of information, I have shown that the spread punched in synonyms. and already I can not remove the correctly placed, but it turned out that Ukraine and synonyms and distributing.And Peter, when one combines the two taxa goes to another synonym, and when you transfer to another genus, the old binary name disappears has to be made manually in the infe sources "

14.12.2014 22:01, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cucullia absinthii / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga Cucullia artemisiae / Tentatively identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

14.12.2014 21:58, Andrey Ponomarev:

It is likely caterpillar Cucullia artemisiae

14.12.2014 21:58, Peter Khramov:

Poudalyat.

14.12.2014 21:56, Peter Khramov:

Why not? You can change any number of data on the taxon. Is that "infe sources" do not. You're about it, or about someone?

14.12.2014 19:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

there is no opportunity to correct their lapses in creating change taxa, at least a half-hour, 15 minutes, possibility to edit.

14.12.2014 19:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120612
From synonyms remove Ukraine :))

14.12.2014 18:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kirinia eversmanni / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

14.12.2014 18:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia vulgata Eupithecia virgaureata.

14.12.2014 17:54, Andrey Kravtsov:

Sasha thanks!

14.12.2014 17:09, Alexander Belousov:

Kirinia eversmanni (Eversmann, 1847)

14.12.2014 15:58, Basil Sergienko:

Looked uncertain vulgata revised and at the same time remaining. Here is the first time rasmotrenii doubt Now I come to the conclusion that the still-virgaureata

14.12.2014 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia vulgata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

14.12.2014 14:42, Andrey Ponomarev:

I agree overlooked

14.12.2014 14:27, Basil Sergienko:

E.vulgata

14.12.2014 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Andrew, if female, then place the appropriate values ​​in the "Sex / development stage," Oka?

14.12.2014 14:20, Andrey Kravtsov:

Junonia oenone female?

14.12.2014 14:18, Andrey Kravtsov:

Junonia oenone?

14.12.2014 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Reserves http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/36353, only there it is called Nola desmotes

14.12.2014 12:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Wooly doll :)

14.12.2014 12:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew photo Euxoa live specimens of this group, even a certain Matt, I would put them in the ill-defined :))

14.12.2014 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amata phegea / Nadin Flegontova Amata nigricornis / Basil Sergienko.

14.12.2014 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amata phegea / Nadin Flegontova Amata nigricornis / Basil Sergienko.

13.12.2014 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amata phegea / Alexandr Zhakov Amata nigricornis / Niyaz Ismagilov.

13.12.2014 21:00, Peter Khramov:

I pulled up.

13.12.2014 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I also tighten.

13.12.2014 19:49, Niyaz Ismagilov:

Amata nigricornis Alphéraky, 1883

13.12.2014 19:32, Peter Khramov:

Change the name - because it was misspelled (typo), or because it was incorrect?

13.12.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

After 21 wonderful. At 21, I leave. Alexander, a long time will not. Himself a day tomorrow to go and sleep off that :)

13.12.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I think about the biology of the form can not be judged only by a single article.

13.12.2014 17:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, what to think, there is an article with the original description, read. Or I did not understand correctly?

13.12.2014 17:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, we must also make it possible to replace the generic name. kind of like a big, several dozen species and the need to change it everywhere, it changed the genus name and the names of all previous binary machine go into synonyms and generic combinations.

13.12.2014 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But that's not the discussion under the sea, under which the cost. This type is described (if it turns kopperi exactly) in 2001 and I do not think a lot about its biology has been known at the moment :)

13.12.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, you're absolutely right, the preparation of the genitals, only one of the tools of definition. In some cases, it gives a 100% guarantee, in others only confuses the definition, and they need to be able to use, you need to know where and what to look for and what to compare. and not look seems, is unlikely. :))

13.12.2014 16:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Today. After 21 to Moscow and preferably not too long :)))

13.12.2014 16:19, Peter Khramov:

Can today. Alexander, how are you?

13.12.2014 15:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithomoia germana / Alexey Perelygin Xylena solidaginis / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.12.2014 15:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithomoia germana / Alexey Perelygin Xylena solidaginis / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.12.2014 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, lepi. The upshot of erroneous group of loans: case. Here and hang any more ((

13.12.2014 14:59, Peter Khramov:

I would sculpt another interface.

13.12.2014 14:28, Irina Nikulina:

The 37 reg uncommon
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.2_Ennominae/2712_Ectephrina_semilutea/Ectephrina%20semilutea.htm
https://fotki.yandex.ru/next/users/bianor/album/143155/view/570883 - there are many copies. collected

13.12.2014 14:19, Alexey Perelygin:

We need to fix it. I agree, it Xylena solidaginis = Lithomoia solidaginis. In the description given Lithomoia germana such as synonyms.

13.12.2014 14:14, Alexey Perelygin:

All right. Her oprededili how Lithomoia solidaginis. We need to fix it. The description Lithomoia germana such as synonymous Lithomoia solidaginis.

13.12.2014 13:06, Yuri Semejkin:

With regard to precision in cooking. Not everyone believes the definition of the genitals in all cases 100% accurate. There is also al. Point of view. 100% accuracy gives full biology. No wonder they say, when nothing works and there are doubts -Look, or to understand the biology.

13.12.2014 11:59, Irina Nikulina:

Basil does not agree) Analysis of the genital apparatus would define beautiful and accurate) information from the literature and comparative analysis, of course, is not superfluous, but the exact answer would give only cooking. So the winner worthy of applause, I can not feel :) Now, if cooked ... which can not (And it would be interesting to learn)

13.12.2014 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Today or Monday can train. Next: depending on circumstances.

13.12.2014 11:22, Peter Khramov:

Why die? How to negotiate - there is contact, no problem. Only to myself in time is not exactly a banner. On Monday, late in the evening I can, but today or tomorrow - it is still unknown. Write to whom when it is convenient ...

13.12.2014 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Forgot Alexander. Just picture it already loaded in September and now they do not accidentally replace the one that had to be. That had to be restored to pick up to an existing underside.
P.S. And even then you smiled :) Really I can not determine the average Wine?

13.12.2014 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew, misled it :) Basil made a gaffe, named one side, and the second is not :)

13.12.2014 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.12.2014 10:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deilephila elpenor / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

13.12.2014 10:52, Andrey Ponomarev:

Deilephila elpenor :-)

13.12.2014 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The question hangs already almost 2 months (((
We must untie it is a photo from the group. Just compare the date of shooting two tracks and compare them with the release date of the imago, which is also in the group.

13.12.2014 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, I'm mentally applaud standing :)
And no genitals were not needed.
Thank you so much :)

13.12.2014 7:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lord, and we have a conference on Skype is dead? It is necessary to discuss some issues.

13.12.2014 1:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, as I understand it, has accepted our invitation to work in the "service on" :)))

13.12.2014 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Peter, pleased, I went to rest :)))

13.12.2014 1:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then, the question is closed. How will the taxa - then there will be a photo. I do not want to void shipping :)

13.12.2014 1:14, Peter Khramov:

Basil is now adding a species is at Alexander, but, by and large, only a full-fledged test curatorial interface. Like all protest - launches the first curators of the garden and open again the possibility of adding species (with the limits for taxa that will disassemble the curators). Iehere or in other additives can write comments on the future, not to forget, but to add these species are now Alexander should not (only if for testing purposes).

13.12.2014 0:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To begin with this: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/bombycidae/bombycidae_7_1.php

13.12.2014 0:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In Bombycidae to do:
http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/search/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=18729.0&FAMILY=BOMBYCIDAE&sort=Genus&beginIndex=53&listPageURL=GenusList3.dsml%3FFAMILY%3DBOMBYCIDAE%26sort%3DGenus%26beginIndex%3D30&searchPageURL=FamilyList.dsml%3FFAMILY%3DBOMBYCIDAE%26sort%3DGenus%26beginIndex%3D30

13.12.2014 0:28, Irina Nikulina:

Everything is clear now, thank you, Basil!

13.12.2014 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Appias maria.

13.12.2014 0:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callicore pitheas / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.

12.12.2014 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

You're right, it's probably still too early or not at all necessary. Although any generic audit the information is there, but in our case it can be confusing.
There is one downside I slipped, I poured it :)) but the track remained: Biston thoracicaria (Oberthur, 1884) = thoracicaria thoracicarius (Oberthür, 1884). When connecting one species with two spellings of the name of the species, not the cell number of taxa set. happened.Two species without descent, but I still joined them. :)))

12.12.2014 23:38, Peter Khramov:

Can. But I have little doubt that this is necessary. Write why (in the presence of combinations of generic types). Rod - thing still more artificial than the species.

12.12.2014 23:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Biston robustum / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

12.12.2014 23:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gynaephora selenitica / Vasiliy Feoktistov Dicallomera fascelina / Andrey Ponomarev.

12.12.2014 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oenospila kopperi / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.12.2014 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oenospila kopperi.

12.12.2014 23:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dicallomera fascelina, Andrey Ponomarev (photo in the group).

12.12.2014 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.12.2014 23:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gynaephora selenitica Dicallomera fascelina.

12.12.2014 23:16, Basil Sergienko:

http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=68445
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Biston_robustus_robustus.html
variability here, there are double

12.12.2014 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, forgot the main thing: to move to a different species. We then drove along and I did not take the caterpillar: it took Andrew and he managed to get the imago. Hence, the override.

12.12.2014 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Andrey Ponomarev.

12.12.2014 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Odd, very simple, should be defined, even without a date.

12.12.2014 22:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter and synonyms can be entered at the generic level? Synonymous with the generic name or kind which previously cited species of this genus.

12.12.2014 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dicallomera fascelinait appeared as a result.
Andrey Ponomarev received the imago (caterpillar they took the excretion) and therefore it is necessary to put the definition of Andrew.
No wonder: it is the caterpillar of sibling species, both infrequent (one might say are rare) and live in the same habitats :)

12.12.2014 22:07, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, thank you! And robustum specify - yes, in April really did not even look, maybe. Sinev in it only for Primorye specified, but once found in the article about the 6 specimens. of the reserve, looking, of course .. I Focus on illyustatsiyu here - "A review of Biston Leach, 1815 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Ennominae) from China ..." http://bdj.pensoft.net//showimg.php?filename = oo_18919.jpg (photos 19 and 20) and did not see the double postbazalnoy sling as in this photo.Because of her, and not considered as an option (Photo by robustum found then the little search engine is now much more lively on robust us responded, looked back a lot of photos and I do not see this sling. Do not go looking or is it within the variability?

12.12.2014 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing to say except that to the underside of these comrades we must also have the upper hand;)

12.12.2014 21:58, Peter Khramov:

Oh, Udea tea any such lutealis'a. Or Basil says that there MoD this fall at every step should be.

12.12.2014 21:48, Peter Khramov:

A. Got it. It not removed, since it is not formalized signs which we operate, and infa made by the user in a free state.

12.12.2014 21:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Biston robustum / Confidently identified / Male / Basil Sergienko.

12.12.2014 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, it's different pieces of information and they are in different mestah.Pervy:

The full name


Biston betularia (Linnaeus, 1758) = Biston betularius (Linnaeus, 1758) = Phalaena betularia Linnaeus, 1758.
the second:

Detailed information identifying the sources


Synonyms and combinations of generic
Amphidasis huberaria Ballion, 1866 [156]. Alexander Zhakov.

12.12.2014 21:20, Basil Sergienko:

lower fasting and H - "is not specified in Sinev for 37 regions - robustum - 6 copies."

12.12.2014 21:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Viewed that is in the region of 37, while the blue of it is not there. Basil and female at the same time to look # 28936. :)

12.12.2014 20:58, Basil Sergienko:

In fact, without a date, it is not quite good, but why robustum not fit?
Some sources even its name-calling and robustus

12.12.2014 18:36, Peter Khramov:

Duc "Synonyms and combinations of the generic" should be fully repeated list of jackdaws ("windows"). And that means, with the wrong come from? On it and the combination of the generic to be an option (for example, obsolete). If you mean that such a combination for this species never existed and could not exist (ie, it's stupid mistake), then yes, it deletes.

12.12.2014 18:32, Irina Nikulina:

Well, here it back) has long wanted to write that in the meantime with a view of trying to understand hypoleucos. I have not found the images and do not think that they are on the network. The species was described from Kazakevichevo village (40 km from Khabarovsk). The article EA Belyaeva, SV Vasilenko, V. Dubatolov, AMLong "moth Bolshekhekhtsirsky Reserve (near Khabarovsk)" (Amur Zoological Journal II (4), 2010, 303-321) examined 328 species of moths collected over 5 years in the vicinity of Khabarovsk. From the kind of Viston collected 4 species - thoracicaria - 5 copies, betularia -5 copies, regalis - 6 specimens and species not listed in Sinev for 37 regions - robustum - 6 copies.But the kind of Biston hypoleucos harvested and there was not such a conclusion - "The species status of the taxon is questionable" (str.311).
And in the article, EA Belyaeva "Fauna chorology moths (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) of the Far East of Russia" to the insects of Russian Far East. Additional volume. Analysis of Fauna and general index of names. Vladivostok. 2011, p. 158-183.in the list of moths known by a few, sometimes only type specimens are often not audited, Set Biston hypoleucos Kuznetsov, 1901.
These are the excavations) is probably the assumption betularia most correct.

12.12.2014 17:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Perth, on the page types of two sections:
First synonyms, which are near the windows, and which can be removed (there is also a generic combination with the correct name of the form, but do not come from the right), the way the question whether they should be removed;
And "Synonyms and generic combinations" that can not be deleted, but you can only add a reference to the source.I am wondering how to remove from this generic combinations, which have become a major name.
With Irina clear, I propose to her and persistently ask to participate in the "Call of the topic" :))

12.12.2014 16:40, Peter Khramov:

Remove as well as other synonyms. Put the check and you press "Delete."
Irina I invited to this topic, but she refused. Were it not last, but not so long ago, once again to ask again. If someone of you to invite her here, and she agrees - I only.
As for the "silent ones" in this topic - note correct.I will thin out the list after the start of the curators.

12.12.2014 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, you can add new types and edit old ones.

12.12.2014 16:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri looked audit Chinese Biston there too Biston thoracicaria, he did not, and she remains hypoleucos betularia.

12.12.2014 15:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Biston thoracicaria can drop http://lietuvai.lt/w/index.php?title=Biston_thoracicaria

12.12.2014 15:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotia cinereana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.12.2014 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

For such a perspective, there must be a second photo with normal camera angles, as well as to the cart. :(

12.12.2014 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

That butterfly of this kind, no doubt, any one of two? will decide in future date, the curator of the taxon. Why would she be uncertain?

12.12.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pontia edusa / Confidently identified / Petr Khramov.

12.12.2014 14:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, who is now no new species adds moratorium :)
At your option, you first need to figure out how much you rightly said, and then added. The interesting finding, the more difficult to understand it.

12.12.2014 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it is necessary to add a kind of Mustilia Walker, 1865 and type in it: http://www.gbif.org/species/search?q=Mustilia
The truth is more we need to understand where this kind of adds to Bombycidae or Endromidae? The very inclined to the first option.
The fact is that at this point one member of this genus (with a view we need to understand) I soak in gasoline and tomorrow I want to expose. But that's kind of can not find ....In general, strongly binds the hands of the inability to add your own taxa (

12.12.2014 13:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Kamchatka (34 regions) have not given Sineva.

12.12.2014 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, but I would give sradostyu cooking and establish the truth. Well, or exchanged for any zhukovё ....
Only here I do not know a man in Moscow who would be interested. This Well-tropics in the end ...... A problem with them forever (
The fact that I am here at the moment exposed - only the "tip of the iceberg" .....
Other afraid even to stand :)

12.12.2014 12:00, Basil Sergienko:

Well, NE 5 is written in sort of different types, although in the past was considered a subspecies solidaginis

12.12.2014 11:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Like in the Palearctic solidaginis, and Neoarktike germana.

12.12.2014 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

No one has the purpose to offend someone. Only the working moments.
Peter, why ignore the issue. Vasily against, although he did not write :). The second time hushed question or we are discussing the subject in the work or why it is needed.Once again I draw your attention that there are people who do not look here for years, and those who work directly and it is necessary to consult and solve common problems are ignored. I would like to hear straight answers: yes or no, by the fact that ...
Now, advisement: now like everything fell into place. All proceeds without tails.The only thing not see how to remove a combination of generic, if it became a major name. I will try to work another day tomorrow and on Sunday, I think you can continue to work. :) The search for curators. :)

12.12.2014 10:43, Basil Sergienko:

It seems as synonyms

12.12.2014 10:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

From the transfer retains the possibility of new information on the Kamchatka Peninsula. If it is determined by the pictures online, itXylena solidaginis.

12.12.2014 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

ThisXylena solidaginis. Alex, why did you decide that itLithomoia germana? This North American species.

12.12.2014 5:54, Alexey Perelygin: This species is identified correctly.

12.12.2014 2:29, Peter Khramov:

Cool.

12.12.2014 2:28, Peter Khramov:

I propose to go to the next level, and believe that you do not insult each other, even when write without emoticons. A?

12.12.2014 0:10, Irina Nikulina:

At least, made some clarity)
That's what I write on Oenospila. The genus of 11 species of Southeast Asia and Australia.On set of 3 signs - white costal margin, the presence of large dark trugolnyh spots in the dorsal edge of the NC and jagged reddish-brown bands on both wings - can be identified for the region 4 near the Asian species - altistrix, microstrix, gemmans, kopperi .Kind of gemmans , I think, can be eliminated, it is clearly timed to you about, Java and Bali (this indication is on mothsofborneo and article, which will be discussed below). Wingspan is given to mothsofborneo: for altistrix 30-34 mm and microstrix - no more than 24mm (this is the smallest species in the genus). In addition, the species altistrix there is some elongation apekalnoy zone and pointed angle and VC http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=352568
http: //www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/31_Oenospila/Oenospila%20altistrix/Oenospila%20altistrix.htm And obviously discussed photo corners are rounded. It remains an open relatively recently (in 2001) Oenospila kopperi . Recorded on mothsofborneo him no, but he discussed in detail in the article by Hausmann, M.Sommerer «Oenospila kopperi, spec. nov., eine neue grüne Geometride aus Sumatra (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Geometrinae) », 2001, http: // biostor.org / reference / 52698 Specifies a wingspan of 26-29 mm, and the figure in the article shows that the apekalnye angles have just such a curve, as in this photo. But, of course, the most reliable species identification allows the study of male genital apparatus.

11.12.2014 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

The findings do suggest themselves :)
I talked about the issues that I do not want to make a wide audience, but it is very useful for working topics, not about the kinds of keys. In the card game, your answer is regarded as a distortion of cards (cards to play it :))))

11.12.2014 23:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the picture is still a picture. Butterfly has to get to a specialist who can tell her species. Can hang hundreds of photos on websites, but until then until publication. This is all personal messages that are typically ignored by serious researchers.The fact that you got a couple of very well, but it does not mean anything. I fished for a new kind of Europe tens of copies. You're all lucky :)))

11.12.2014 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, with her photo of the peninsula has long been replicated in the network of the authorship Alexei Yakovlev :)
It's really not news. And the view seems to be common there. If even to me, passing two copies. "flew into" :)

11.12.2014 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did not write :)

11.12.2014 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you're against that Irina would be to include in the official topic?

11.12.2014 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I think comments should be called Irina is not just "working time," as competent and balanced basis for determining fairly difficult species. And the place is just so comments on a page with a photo, to which they belong, and not on the sidelines, where they can see one.This is important information, and it is desirable that knew her as much as possible people. I always see the completeness and consistency of the arguments Irene. From this site only advantages. And why hide it?

11.12.2014 20:53, Shamil Murtazin:

Fancy as a carpet :)

11.12.2014 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, extra emotions :))) Everything flows, everything changes, so well-known border area, describes the new species. A variant of type double to mainland Asia you not admit? Having the material, you can only imagine, and we are with you, what kind of became known from a different point.Cooked material, you would know exactly whether it is, or would have had a new, undescribed species. :)))

11.12.2014 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Geography mothsofborneo on outdated, definitely :) And there is evidence of this. The labels of these copies. true (the person who gathered as the trust itself). Add a personal message in the "spread" of Peninsular Malaysia.
Facts (not sites on the network) say that no is not endemic to Borneo :)

11.12.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

double site comments:
11.12.2014 17:56 Alexander Zhakov data as changed.
frischella removed from synonyms
11.12.2014 17:56 Alexander Zhakov data as changed.
frischella removed from synonyms

11.12.2014 15:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Male http://thornesinsects.com/catalog-insect-1135414/Euphaedra_medon

11.12.2014 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Re-enter predagayu Irina Nikulin in the service group, there are questions driven by her features and refinements. I would not want all of these working moments to leave on pages of photos.

11.12.2014 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

1. It is not possible to clean the "Synonyms and combinations of the generic", and there now may be the right combination.
2. The situation is finding a new kind of hearth in the old race has not changed.

11.12.2014 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Danis danis / Tentatively identified / Male / Andrey Kravtsov.

10.12.2014 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, all tomorrow) will be available when the normal Internet, ruler and butterfly. I hope that this will really help)))

10.12.2014 21:11, Peter Khramov:

A. Excellent. All the rules, you're caught Gluck, which I missed. Now I fixed, and everything should work. Try something else, thread improper transfer to the new parent check.

10.12.2014 21:00, Irina Nikulina:

It is very knowledge would help wingspan. Basil, please specify)

10.12.2014 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

detachment Lepidoptera → Gelechioidea → superfamily family genus Coleophoridae → Coleophora → view Damophila trifolii - it is necessary to fix a race, and it kind of a different kind. Or am I doing something wrong?

10.12.2014 17:59, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, everything is normal plowing, I understand correctly? Yet the correction of the name of the form to try, but it must be sought, and the glitches there might be a little bit. Key must occur when transferring to the other parent and association.All norms tolerated all infa from one species to another go?
If so, accomplish your goal, you take a taxon as the curator, and then we'll hang on to announce a set of curators.

10.12.2014 17:12, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps I am mistaken, but there are doubts that this patrana. The considerations are - confused discal spot in a narrow bar, most photos it is much thicker http://taibif.tw/zh/namecode/344426 (here in the film image 15). In addition there have patrana two parallel weak strokes above and below the ground, and postbazalnaya wavy band is well expressed.But the main thing - Bending apekalnoy zone VC patrana at another end of the wing is less curved and marginal line almost straight, here it is clearly seen http://www.jpmoth.org/Drepanidae/Drepaninae/Callidrepana_patrana.html. And wingspan other - for patrana it is specified within 29-36mm. And the main living areas - Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan.
Ready to discuss objections. On others.types have to dig in more detail, there are 2 suspected)

10.12.2014 16:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dalima mjoebergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2014 16:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dalima mjoebergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2014 16:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

View Damophila mayrella tied to the old old Coleophora

10.12.2014 16:26, Irina Nikulina:

And here, too mjoebergi, with the same explanation as under # 35886

10.12.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Print off, Seeking can now try at home, but now, after a night at work :)

10.12.2014 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dalima mjoebergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2014 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dalima mjoebergi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.12.2014 14:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

So are Thalassodes and Orothalassodes

10.12.2014 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes I am that it took me six weeks ago to temporarily and will not be returned.

10.12.2014 13:14, Peter Khramov:

Interface for testing curators Alexander. Accordingly, for him and infa. And about "my interface" I did not understand the question. What are you talking about?

10.12.2014 12:49, Alex Dumchus:

Actias selene ?

10.12.2014 12:43, Irina Nikulina:

But it was he, the little tails on HCC between Rs and M1 in place - this mjoebergi and differs from similar species delineata. And other species in the genus Dalima with drawing no wings. Perhaps geography mothsofborneo outdated?) We've already convinced a couple of times in this newly ..

10.12.2014 12:03, Irina Nikulina:

Well, yes, in Pelagodes only cooking it is all about. And this is the 8th segment "of the male abdomen" appears as a major diagnostic feature on all kinds of photo Pelagodes after cooking. For example - any http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_37_7.php.

10.12.2014 11:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes is probably not necessary. And I do not pokupal.V Seitz library a few pictures for memories of it did.

10.12.2014 8:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, you do not apologize for that! You do not dictate the price)))

10.12.2014 8:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

8-th segment in the sense of the abdomen? There's all kind of almost all types of genital.

10.12.2014 8:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yuri! Photos females internete- Legion !!!
Site butterfly Indochina seems nobody criticized
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/pie/20420001.html
A book Zeytsa? Probably need a new buy something, just everything is so pounded into the framework.

10.12.2014 7:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I add. My interface should be discussed with me first.

10.12.2014 6:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not need a disk imaging? Just wondering. Or not with regards to these issues and discusses the past? A reasonable question, and the answer will depend on my findings.

10.12.2014 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Alexander sent you infu Interface in the mail. How then - whistle.

10.12.2014 0:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Dmitriy ! With the book Seitz Makrolepidoptera females Hebomoia glaucippe on the front wings on the orange stripes are no black spots. These blemishes are only for males. Also in females, with the pure orange stripes (outside bars) are the same color spots, separated by strips.Attempts to find in google image females of this species, nor to no avail, the page is written is not available. Males please open without problems, while females do not.
Dmitry, if you wish, you can throw in a personal picture of a male and female in the same file.

10.12.2014 0:02, Peter Khramov:

Uff ...

09.12.2014 22:19, Andrey Kravtsov:

Callicore pitheas

09.12.2014 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But such a transfer in part because there is a transliteration of the Latin commentaries on Latin Russian :) Google separately from England knows.

09.12.2014 19:03, Peter Khramov:

I wanted to write about "the glory of God that is now being translated not comment on a pv en", but decided to go a little bypass and just posted automatic translation.

09.12.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good result: did not expect :) And beguiled dimorphism Godonela avitusaria: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Macariini/macariini_6_8.php

09.12.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's the same kind:Danis danis
Andrew, do not write on line "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age)." species name.

09.12.2014 18:39, Andrey Kravtsov:

Lycaenidae.Papua

09.12.2014 18:09, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Sorry .... I tried ... :)

09.12.2014 17:00, Irina Nikulina:

I am also very "love" species of these genera, Dmitry :))) particularly because it does not exist anywhere on the prescribed key is good :).Pelagodes - and can not be (there is still the 8th segment decides?) But there is in the description of types of Thalassodes and Orothalassodes and Diagnosis any defining characteristics and features that it is possible to collect all in one place, but the job of work that ...! (( And yet it is necessary to master, perhaps it will be useful)

09.12.2014 16:50, Irina Nikulina:

Oh ... the horror ..) Peter, but he moved it out of fright, probably :)), much better than usual with the English. into Russian. Meaning uhvachena) But I have refused such specificity. texts on the Google-transleytu drive ((get to the essence - and then in your own words) And where do you want to put this? On angloyaz. version?

09.12.2014 16:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thank you! But the price will be cheaper in Europeanization (((

09.12.2014 16:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, why the Russian text amplitude Phat? From England, I do not own, but on Russian reads well. Tea in Russia live :)
I fully agree with Irina. And it's a good thing, when a suspicion of one type are obtained two new species for the site :)
Irina, thanks blshoe :)
A godonely still be ..... They have me :)

09.12.2014 16:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

There was a new look, became two :)))

09.12.2014 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Godonela avitusaria / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.12.2014 16:29, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Well, Dmitri ... The answer came from an employee "Natural History Publications (Borneo)":

"Dear Svetlana,
Your email re Butterflies and Moths of Borneo was forward to me by Datuk CL Chan, I have the whole series of Moths of Borneo from Part 1 to Part 18, the most recent published is Part 2 which is the summary of the whole series, please kindly log to our website www.borneobooks.com

If you need any further information, please kindly contact me again.

Regards,
Rosalind Tsang "

09.12.2014 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Godonela avitusaria / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.12.2014 16:27, Peter Khramov:

Gugl.Transleyt horrified and turned penultimate comments like this:
Basil, look, please, at postdiskalnuyu double sash, it does not reach the bone and smooth with rounded deviates from it - a defining characteristic of this species. And the females of this species is more homogeneous pattern of wings with less clearly expressed and double sash and postbazalnoy.

09.12.2014 16:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Godonela hygies / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.12.2014 16:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Godonela hygies / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

09.12.2014 16:15, Irina Nikulina:

But there was not a female Godonela avitusaria, and the maleGodonela hygieshttp://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=313426. Basil, look, please, at postdiskalnuyu double sash, it does not reach the bone, and gradually, with rounding, it deviates from it - a defining characteristic of this species.And females of this species is more homogeneous image of the wings, with less clearly expressed and a double, and postbazalnoy sash

09.12.2014 16:13, Irina Nikulina:

And drawing the top and underside of the wings and the shape of the wing of the male (significantly different from that in females) - all exactly consistent with the features in the description of the formGodonela avitusariaand images online

09.12.2014 15:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.12.2014 15:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.12.2014 15:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is just a female

09.12.2014 14:46, Peter Khramov:

It will be possible to add again - add and transfer.

09.12.2014 14:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Dindica olivacea / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

09.12.2014 14:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Dindica olivacea / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

09.12.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calliteara pseudabietis - Far view, in Europe it is not :) Red tail have it in the shade at the bottom of the picture :)

09.12.2014 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

09.12.2014 10:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tasta montana / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

09.12.2014 9:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Irina! Maybe even on maternity Pelagodes, Thalassodes and Orothalassodes Keys show, and then I broke the brain with them. By Ornithospila- great - and I cooked them.

09.12.2014 8:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Diehlea tumida / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Diehlea ducalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.12.2014 8:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Diehlea tumida / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Diehlea ducalis / Female / Irina Nikulina.

09.12.2014 8:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Diehlea tumida / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov Diehlea ducalis / Female / Irina Nikulina.

09.12.2014 8:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ornithospila submonstrans / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.12.2014 8:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ornithospila submonstrans / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.12.2014 5:03, Olga Titova:

Most likely this caterpillar no red tail, and it is not yellow. In my opinion, this is the caterpillar Calliteara pseudabietis Butler, 1885.

09.12.2014 0:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thank you for Keys :) I think they will be useful for the future.
In fact, everything is relatively simple and straightforward with distinction "similar" species.

09.12.2014 0:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Irene. I admit my mistake and completely agree with the arguments. I apologize and ask you to move all three photosDiehlea ducalis

09.12.2014 0:10, Irina Nikulina:

Not tumida, femaleDiehlea ducalis(justification for photo # 30184)

09.12.2014 0:05, Irina Nikulina:

And is not tumida, the explanation here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30184. Also, I think the femaleDiehlea ducalis

09.12.2014 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Yes, if the curator put checkbox, then the issue definitely on his conscience (that is not an option when the question just slipped down the page, and you forget all about it).

08.12.2014 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

This does not tumida, Basil. In tumida apekalny blunt angle VK / cut and the width of the zone postmedialnoy bone is much more than the dorsal angle. Look at what angle postdiskalnaya sling goes here (almost tornalny angle included) http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/108_Diehlea/Diehlea_tumida/Diehlea%20tumida.htm and under what pictured Svetlana.
And here, I think, the femaleDiehlea ducalishttp: //www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/108_Diehlea/Diehlea%20ducalis/Diehlea%20ducalis.htm
2 other pictures - also not tumida (

08.12.2014 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then it is clear: the conscience of a curator, I understand? This business.

08.12.2014 23:37, Irina Nikulina:

Ornithospila submonstrans(wavy sling chevron discal spot on the LC, light fringe with dark narrow strip in front of it)

08.12.2014 23:31, Irina Nikulina:

And this is still the sameOrnithospila submonstrans

08.12.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No doubt there :)
For referenceOrnithospila lineata, referred to the moths of borneo in the "Habitat preference" :
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/22_Ornithospila/Ornithospila%20lineata/Ornithospila%20lineata.htm
A completely different appearance.

08.12.2014 22:57, Peter Khramov:

Moderator has the right to carry and use of it, if the curator brakes. The curator has the right to put daw "not tolerate" and can use it if he, for example, disagrees with the moderator. Nonoperative curator here will not lead to the fact that Fota will not moved for the second month.
No not supervised.I'm just another interface for them to finish.

08.12.2014 22:55, Svetlana Shchavelina:

And this?

08.12.2014 22:55, Svetlana Shchavelina:

And this is already possible to punch the keys?

08.12.2014 22:52, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Tasta montana?

08.12.2014 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ornithospila esmeralda?
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_22_8.php

08.12.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Norm the rules, but that's it can rest on the efficiency of the reaction facilitator / moderator (kategorecheski not agree to suspend certain issues "on year", when it is possible to solve them quickly). What to do: sooner or later make mistakes.Even on the same or boldsystems jpmoth error "with a trolley car" Without them, life is boring (pun intended) :)
Which groups, by the way at the moment is supervised on the site?

08.12.2014 21:12, Peter Khramov:

Probably something like this: the moderator can endure, but the last word curator. If they agreed, the curator has the right to put a ban on the subsequent transfer. Normal?

08.12.2014 18:57, Irina Nikulina:

To comply with requests to paint the details Basil Identification signs. On mothsofborneo there is an indication that all six species are easily distinguishable on these grounds. I must say that not agree with Basil that "color fringing is not the first and last base and should be more signs." Sometimes the color fringe is the first and the last, that is,the only feature of closely related species.Just divide the 6 species on the 2 groups : a wavy bands - avicularia, submonstrans,
bipunctata and straight - sundaensis, cincta, succincta
1st group:
avicularia - discal spot on the LC V-shaped (chevron-shaped / chevron), red, and red fringe entirely
submonstrans - discal spot on the LC V-shaped, red and white fringe, a fringe of dark line in front of her,usually Fringe cross red marks in places where the veins.
bipunctata - discal spot on the LC small dot, red, white fringe, a fringe of dark line in front of her, red marks in places where the veins are rare.2nd group:
sundaensis - discal spot red
cincta - discal spot green, fringe and marginal line in front of it (the widest of all kinds), magenta, ZOC with uniformly colored underside. succincta - discal spot green, fringe whiter, crosses the red-coated, marginal line in front of the narrow fringe, red underside ZK - with a dark wide area at the apex.
I should add that the color "red" to all kinds of pointed, as in mothsofborneo - everywhere there is «red», but in fact he would rather varies from light brown to brick red.The key here http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_22.php
A correlate symptoms with pictures here http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/framepage_geometrinae.html There's all of these species, not only avicularia Qual. It is better to look here https://www.flickr.com/photos/mothlady/8187890600/ I do not like to link to Flickr, but in this case is justified - a typical fringe is clearly visible)

08.12.2014 18:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Curator primarily works on systematics taxon generic changes and higher taxa, adds types and combines synonyms. And of course it brings in the inside of its taxon, and uncertain of their taxon. His opinion is a priority in its taxon.(For hedging, it is desirable to leave Rollback administrator, the ability to bring everything back to the starting point). Moderator can make any transfers, but very carefully and very eager to taxa with curators that have taken place and no one who does not drive in the neck. You do not have to provide a disservice, and then apologize.Proverb "haste, makes waste." uncertain if the butterfly is not transferred per month, it is not a tragedy, and the working time and curators should take care of their taxa and view new arrivals regularly.To date, the curators yet, moderators unit, with adequate behavior of all, the problems do not see. The work will, we will decide.
Another opinion, curator, moderator of the same, only more deeply versed in the particular group.

08.12.2014 18:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I cut her and get exactly this kind of

08.12.2014 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/08_SCOLIOPTERYGINAE/Rusicada/Rusicada%20combinans/Rusicada%20combinans.htm

08.12.2014 14:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, of course, it is desirable that their supervisors taxa in them and transferred. Just not always time / activity they will be, but there will always be issues and as new, unresolved will crawl on a very long-range plan and the need to take them out again, you can forget the banal.I, it is easy to put all close the question in the "foreign" taxon, if given convincing arguments for this or myself know the answer.
Curator or moderator in my mind have different features: Curator monitors strictly defined taxa that are secured behind him and watching everything moderator.Including what is for some reason neglected by the curator. But if the curator will be able to endure all taxa, it will not be a curator and moderator. So I see the question :)

08.12.2014 13:09, Peter Khramov:

When adding a return types, I've already written. With the realization I brake, and this is some of the reasons, but not the essence. Like all completed with this case - so bear. On the right - the same. The only thing necessary to discuss (it is already possible to start), in their taxa only supervisors can carry or not only.

08.12.2014 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, I think that you are hasty transfer. It asked not to carry it anywhere yet. These are the butterflies, which is necessary to drive on the keys. Although I agreed with the suggestion, but still, in my opinion the color fringing is not the first and last base and should be more signs.

08.12.2014 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it is necessary to return the function of adding new taxa. It is important. Already at least a few species are waiting for this.
So please give me back my rights. This is also important. One and a half months have passed and this term, I think is more than enough.

08.12.2014 8:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dalima patularia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.12.2014 8:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dalima patularia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.12.2014 8:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monodecus capillatus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.12.2014 8:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Monodecus capillatus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.12.2014 8:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ornithospila submonstrans / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.12.2014 8:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Anomis combinans / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

08.12.2014 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Yes, a different philosophy. I do not go to it all the scolding. To go to the mirror and to the compact - no. Portyut high.

08.12.2014 1:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Godonela avitusaria ♂ ?

08.12.2014 1:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Godonela avitusaria ♀ ?

08.12.2014 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Judging by the colors of fringe, then I agree with the conclusion that it submonstrans.
But in spite of this it is important to get rid of its keys.
Irina, if you're really not difficult, the sign for, please do everything in detail.
Well, a reference to the Keys would like to have :) This is really important.

08.12.2014 0:33, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, all the 6 types (she already looked and read) is well-defined features. By combining color / shape discal spots, fringe, the bond of all 6 clearly distinguishable. Tomorrow I will try to write everything, if necessary. Almost sure that the photoOrnithospila submonstrans

08.12.2014 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thanks for the timely issue. Unfortunately determined only by the notorious "habit." And he doubts is exactly my definition. Of course there are some differences, but I can not understand them yet. We need to find the keys and get rid of them to make an accurate verdict :)
I ask is will not tolerate. We must deal with them until the end.

07.12.2014 23:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri! I, too, had all kinds of cameras and compact :) have now as a convenient small camera.
And with accessories always will be - there is no mass user. But 5-6 years has ebay and aliexpress :)
Peter, if you set debugged, it is not asking to eat) is unique - size increases.
Seems still Kulibin Macro Consumer Digicam successfully removed)

07.12.2014 23:12, Irina Nikulina:

Basil, as the definition is not the issue, then you know how to safely externally 5-6 all similar types of Borneo differ. That there was no doubt, if not difficult to write as this kind of, for example, to distinguish submonstrans http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/22_Ornithospila/Ornithospila%20submonstrans/Ornithospila%20submonstrans.htm

07.12.2014 22:59, Peter Khramov:

I too thought the CD itself kamerku reynoksa or something like this take. Then he changed his mind, however. From her train, and the buzz is that anything it ought not, except kamerki itself.

07.12.2014 22:36, Fedor Ovechkin:

From sources (http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/theclinae/cigaritis/, http://yutaka.it-n.jp/), it follows that in the south of Vietnam, there are two kinds of similar color:Cigaritis lohita(two subspeciesCigaritis lohita batinaandCigaritis lohita himalayanus) andCigaritis syama(with one subspeciesCigaritis syama peguanus). According to the color underside these two types very well differ from each other.The problem is that the copy of the photograph occupies an intermediate position, but still close to C. syama.
I propose to move into certain inaccurate Cigaritis syama.

07.12.2014 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ornithospila avicularia

07.12.2014 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dalima patularia

07.12.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dalima patularia

07.12.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Risoba sp. Risoba obscurivialis? Another option may be aRisoba vialis?

07.12.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

ViewAnomis combinansin the catalog. I think you can endure. If I am not mistaken, I have a couple of copies. straightened (loaded later) :).

07.12.2014 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Monodecus capillatusin inaccurate.

07.12.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Monodecus capillatusin inaccurate.

07.12.2014 20:00, Aleksandr Andrianov:

In Western Ukraine is a fairly common form of

07.12.2014 19:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.

07.12.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Melanistic couple? We have not seen such dark never ....

07.12.2014 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Risoba walshae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.12.2014 16:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Buck

07.12.2014 16:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Buck

07.12.2014 16:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Buck

07.12.2014 11:44, Irina Nikulina:

Olga, the second name - a subspecies of copper-butterfly Celastrina sugitanii (Matsumura, 1919) (http://sunyou.co.kr/gallery/?offset=75&cate1=&searchkey=&searchvalue=), inhabiting just only in one region of the Russian Federation, Sakhalin - C. s. sachalinensis (Esaki, 1922).

07.12.2014 10:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calyciphora nephelodactyla / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.12.2014 4:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, G10 refers to the compact. Only compacts are different. Cameras at the time conditionally divided into soap dishes, compacts and SLRs. The most primitive, with disabilities called compacts, the camera is now such restrictions simply do not produce, technology has moved forward.By the way, and SLR conditionally divided into amateur, semi-professional and professional. It is understood that last significantly different matrix size, speed AF, continuous shooting speed, a more powerful processor and robust housing. And the price too.Maybe you are interested, here are the figures taken from the magazine shop that year about 2006. There, in one of the articles dealt with the price and camera models enjoyed by Hollywood pros. So only one body was worth 4 to 5 thousand. Ye
So everyone chooses a camera, based on the capabilities and needs.Shamil! As for the problems with uvelichilkami for compact cameras, the earlier they were not particularly. It was enough to break through on an Internet database, from which the camera "run up" to go to shop and buy. Or, make an order in the internet, pre-acquainted with the possibilities of the product and customer reviews.I think that now, nothing has changed with option to purchase. More precisely I can not add, because I do not have the need for magnifying accessories.

07.12.2014 2:43, Olga Titova:

I, too, in the archive the same copper-butterfly is not defined from Sakhalin. She found that in Sakhalin only Celastrina ladonides d'Orza, 1869 and copper-butterfly seaside
[sachalinensis Esaki, 1922]. The first is not suitable, but the second?

07.12.2014 1:55, Irina Nikulina:

Risoba walshaesame butterfly, as in the previous photo # 21197

07.12.2014 0:36, Fedor Ovechkin:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Boloria_Angarensis - found here is short.

07.12.2014 0:07, Fedor Ovechkin:

Entomologist Zajc Adalbert (Adalbert Seitz), and U, in this case, from the first letter of the word Unterseite - lower side (underside), is also found in combination Hinterflügel-Unterseite - underside of the rear wing.

06.12.2014 23:17, Stan Korb:

aglaja

06.12.2014 22:04, Irina Nikulina:

http://lepidoptera.crimea.ua/1701_Pterophoridae/Calyciphora_xanthodactyla.htm

06.12.2014 21:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calyciphora xanthodactyla ?, where to look in the book do not hunt to climb :))

06.12.2014 21:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Keep. SLR fully interchangeable on a bar of soap.
Sorry, but the same applies to the G10 Consumer Digicam.
The result can be more improved if screwed Magnification 1.5x or even 2-3 (if they exist in nature). But on the Consumer Digicam the problem is this - do not have these accessories in a wide sales and many make their own.

06.12.2014 20:49, Irina Nikulina:

I think that here Pingasa alba
http://hattoritaka.web.fc2.com/ga2012/ooshiroayashaku.html
Similar species reviewed. As they say on Japanese sites have alba very smooth outer black sling and only a slight bend on the inside on the VC http://outdoor.geocities.jp/nabenight/4ayasyaku.htm
Here we have no alba, and many other species are absent, it is necessary to add

06.12.2014 18:21, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, fuck off, please, this elephant) I do not like very elegant pterophoridae))

06.12.2014 17:58, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, not much in the news topic, but the theme of the last kommentariya- some species are not illustrated because there were doubts about the photos. You've got an agreement with Andrei http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35588 was definitely on the photos from a third-party resources. It has all unnecessary and can be removed up everything to illustrate? Andrew or until such leave of comments?

06.12.2014 17:37, Irina Nikulina:

Calyciphora nephelodactyla? At 8 registration only 2 species of the genus, the second - Calyciphora xanthodactyla - is extremely rare, and looks different.

06.12.2014 17:09, Peter Khramov:

It's not caching. The fact that the main species are considered, which are assigned to illustrate and gallery - total number of species in the photographs. That is, for example, phot loaded, and by way of illustration are not yet used - then the main species is not counted, and counted in the galley.Do not use it may be just because of the delay (this is my hands and Irina Nikulina), or because there are doubts about the accuracy of the determination (but not enough yet to carry Fautua in undefined). Ie the discussion goes.

06.12.2014 16:34, Yuri Semejkin:

A bar of soap as such seems to have not. Take a look http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29627. Taken not SLR and outdated Canon G10 in macro mode

06.12.2014 16:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

What is it like ?

06.12.2014 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notocelia roborana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.12.2014 16:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Clear. Well, the wings and the parties understood.

06.12.2014 15:53, Evgeny Komarov:

If Peter believes that the pull of insects in general, as the minmum beetles supported by two hands - yet it is my group in which more than a butterfly that I was more interested in terms of photography. And the family of ground beetles TB So I am for! And there will be more active participants in no doubt.

06.12.2014 15:53, Irina Nikulina:

Notocelia roborana?

06.12.2014 15:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

UPF = upperside fore-wing
UPH = upperside hindwing
UNF- fore-wing underside
UPF -fore-wing upperside
UPS – fore-wing & hind-wing upper sides
Up = upperside
Un = underside

06.12.2014 15:50, Andrey Ponomarev:

Soap box is not oboytis.Toko SLR.

06.12.2014 15:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you for the extra!

06.12.2014 15:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

shield and bow Marsa- symbol of male, female mirror symbol Venery-
HW hind wings back wings
FW fore wings front fenders

06.12.2014 15:23, Shamil Murtazin:

Perhaps the answer here: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/38-rhop/opredelitel-vidov-bulavousykh-babochek/201-opredelitel-belyanki-pieridae-09
And in general on the site a good determinant :)

06.12.2014 15:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes set can be different. I usually DSLR, Macro and macrocycle. Well, the track is still there.
It seems that the presence of skill and a good tripod can do a good soap.

06.12.2014 15:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander seems not quite of it. With male-female designations everything clear so designated not only butterflies.
But paired letters OS, and US, - somehow in general have never met, but also informative. If I understand correctly, the OS-is the upper side of the wings, and the US-ispod?
I asked about the letter U. I would like to find out what it stands for.It looks like an old, probably not used the designation-but still found. For example, such a designation is at the German entomologist seiza, I believe the 19th century. I got the impression that they used the letter U in the designation of the type specified is not exactly supposed. Just wanted to know more specific.

06.12.2014 14:48, Olga Titova:

Good day to all! Can you please tell how to distinguish between a caterpillar on green-veined white Painted Lady? She read to these butterflies on the site, but did not understand.

06.12.2014 14:43, Shamil Murtazin:

There's probably something like caching is used. :)

06.12.2014 14:42, Olga Titova:

But what equipment should be used for such a great shot?

06.12.2014 14:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

♂ OS - ♂ US - ♀ OS - ♀ US - is the upper side and lower side of the wing, Yuri, you're about sprashvaesh?

06.12.2014 14:16, Yuri Semejkin:

In some sources there are graphic symbols males (circle up arrow) and females (down arrow icon). Along with this more common letter of the U. What does it mean?

06.12.2014 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

06.12.2014 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, why on the main page 5095 kinds of illustrations, and in 5100 the gallery?

06.12.2014 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Home said that the 5095 :)

06.12.2014 13:46, Andrey Ponomarev:

5100 appearance. :-)

06.12.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oreta carnea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.12.2014 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We must move to a form similar to the top.

06.12.2014 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.12.2014 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.12.2014 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

06.12.2014 11:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergei Kotov.

06.12.2014 11:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergei Kotov.

06.12.2014 11:08, Andrey Ponomarev:

Inside gossip leaves the cocoon in which to spend the winter doll Selenia dentaria.

06.12.2014 2:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena helle

06.12.2014 2:29, Shamil Murtazin:

the definition of a caterpillar - Sergei Kotov

06.12.2014 2:29, Shamil Murtazin:

the definition of a caterpillar - Sergei Kotov

06.12.2014 2:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Hmm ... Peter, and you saw what happened? ..
I turned out. 32959. Then choose it in the group - only 32958.
But if any other, such as 34220, - it will be the company of 6 photos. As well?..

06.12.2014 1:27, Shamil Murtazin:

And I peered into bumps on the leaves and do not understand how there is such a great fit gusyanka))))

06.12.2014 0:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Probably yes, if there are several clutches. It is also possible that the remaining (which poorly-green) just empty, that will not be developed.

06.12.2014 0:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Not necessarily doll. In such and such "houses" often occur and caterpillars. It is easily detected, if the lift is slightly fastened with a leaf.

05.12.2014 22:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Oreta carnea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.12.2014 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think it is necessary to put an end. Irina law definition: itOreta carnea. I confess, I forgot about it and did not respond in time. I looked Geometridae: nobody came. Then he suspected for involvement in Bombycidae: too, "the zeros".Even suspected genus Gunda , but then otmёl it :)
But before he reached Drepanidae (
And now I want to bring another interesting fact in favor of the correctness of the definition: to mattress before maceration butterfly had the exact same position and shape as that of the living in nature (this sometimes happens when the mattress is laid svezhezamoreny material). It is necessary to transfer to the form :)

05.12.2014 19:59, Peter Khramov:

About insects removed. We discuss the issues raised in the phone as well as online boutiques directory will be appropriate, and there will be Missagh.

05.12.2014 17:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

The leaves of the pupa, it is like a cocoon appearance. :)

05.12.2014 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Paracrama dulcissima / Vasiliy Feoktistov Chloriola gratissima / Irina Nikulina.

05.12.2014 17:03, Shamil Murtazin:

This mine caterpillars or what? .. it is not clear ...

05.12.2014 16:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Different color eggs - a stage of maturity?

05.12.2014 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Exactly. Even our grandmother spent on this stuff. Shitty thing after all ...

05.12.2014 16:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasiliy- diagnosis CUT !!!

05.12.2014 16:23, Irina Nikulina:

But he mothsofborneo on such a painted, with a bluish tinge http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-18/ariolicini/ariolicini_15_1.php, but they call it, as translated - deep (saturated) emerald - green (deep emerald green). Anyway, obviously not the same as in Paracrama dulcissima)

05.12.2014 16:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, the fish sword saw statues. Left if the sea view, the market will be. All right. At the fish market Crabs ringgit 6 kg. Not India, but also inexpensive.

05.12.2014 16:14, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Yeah, of course ... This market will be to the left of the statue of fishes (green circle at the intersection) and Wisma Merdeka Phase - right (on your card - the extreme right yellow square). This market, we drove past, once even went into the part where fruit, I took a few photos, but nothing has been bought. It seemed to me - dirty there ...In the part where the fish - do not go, there smelled strongly ....

05.12.2014 16:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In this photo, the color of the top - obviously not green.

05.12.2014 16:08, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitry, I see that the butterfly has moved, and yet - not quite understand what it does not fit on Chloriola gratissima of paragraphs 1 and 3? And what kind of gratissima - a photo or a photo of Basil link cat. I gave to gratissima? Especially do not understand the 3rd item ..

05.12.2014 16:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

05.12.2014 15:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

http://www.svali.ru/show_picture.php?cntr=57&type=1&id=15&cd=1
Central Market they call his local Filipino

05.12.2014 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Limenitis helmanni / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.12.2014 15:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We would of QC field all night to eliminate, but money talks. And every article in the QC is worth the money.

05.12.2014 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male Limenitis helmanni helmanni Lederer, 1853

05.12.2014 14:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Athyma recurva ?

05.12.2014 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chersonesia rahria / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

05.12.2014 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chersonesia rahria / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

05.12.2014 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And from the same article that the Nizhny Novgorod region. Do people have nothing ..... :)
There, by the way, too, entered the Moth: http://red-book-nn.ru/docs/02-2-02-107.htm
And the link to our QC. Fashion this (

05.12.2014 14:20, Yuri Semejkin:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/37256239@N03/3429401031/

05.12.2014 14:20, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

05.12.2014 14:17, Peter Khramov:

It is not clear, why in the world do suschestvet "Red Book of Moscow region." Still Red Book Lenin Street city Lipezdrischenska would. And how are we without it ...

05.12.2014 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Yes I see. As ochnus - do.

05.12.2014 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, here's your job requires.

05.12.2014 13:15, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Look again at my post on 11.19.2014.

05.12.2014 13:07, Svetlana Shchavelina:

The Philippine market - that I do not know where ... where we did not go to the market ... I know - the building is near the central waterfront (where the statue of enormous fishes), if you look at the bay - is right.
Let's wait for the response of their leaders, I wrote a letter to him. The publication, at which I was hunting at the time - neither then nor now online they do not light up.

05.12.2014 12:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I looked at them nothing interesting on the topic.

05.12.2014 12:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

From Philippine market far?

05.12.2014 12:43, Svetlana Shchavelina:

It is in the heart of the city, a business center, as I understand .... First floor - shopping, top - offices. I rewrite the address to business cards: A913, 9-th Floor, Wisma Merdeka Phase 1. tel. 088-233 098. Director: Datin Connie Chan.
Hours .... Here I swear I do not remember ... Another caveat: there are 2 lift from the 1st floor, with no elevator to get everyone possible, we must look pointers.

05.12.2014 12:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Even in the country I have bred, worth 2 bracken bush transplanted from the forest

05.12.2014 12:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I spend the night in Kota only, but may appear podkinite passwords and how to find them?

05.12.2014 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is even another generation, in my opinion.

05.12.2014 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

There were photos of the author affixed determine without the name (and such is the case). Fixed. The author of the photo until you get to associate in groups. :)))

05.12.2014 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phoebis neocypris / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov Not identified.

05.12.2014 11:36, Alexander Belousov:

I shot so - Left light from the window on the right white screen reflector. Top twisted spit-turned-ist. directional light (lantern LDS) and highlight the best hit (overflow color and brightness) Press the descent. Camera EFTA-but on a tripod. The distance from the paper - length of the needle (not paper and Styrofoam, it is still very absorbs and scatters light).

05.12.2014 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis neocypris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.12.2014 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis neocypris / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.12.2014 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Summers wanted)))
In those places where the picture "Fern Moth", "fern moth" massive appearance. And indeed for personal observations butterfly is everywhere, where it grows "Orlyak ordinary" (a kind of fern, which mainly develops a caterpillar): https: //ru.wikipedia.org / wiki / Orlyak_obyknovenny
It is not clear for what reason she was in the Red Book of the Moscow region: http://kkmo2.verhovye.ru/rb/bspozvon/lithina_chlorosata.php

05.12.2014 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phoebis neocypris / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov Not identified.

05.12.2014 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov Phoebis neocypris / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.12.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov Not identified.

05.12.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov Not identified.

05.12.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second copy. obviously the same kind as the last loaded: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35986
AgainDalima mjoebergi??? Concerned about the issue. Why not from Borneo, and on the peninsula?
It seems like it is endemic to Borneo:
"Dalima mjoebergi Prout. Endemic. Upper montane." : http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/checklist.php
That's really a mystery :)
And judging throughout the species is found in Peninsular Malaysia often ......

05.12.2014 10:16, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Dmitry, office Natural History Publications (Borneo) is located in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah. So I'm asking where geographically you. You can visit them and buy something, because the mail packages there - very expensive to obtain.

05.12.2014 10:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Paracrama dulcissima / Vasiliy Feoktistov Chloriola gratissima / Irina Nikulina.

05.12.2014 8:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Excellent chewed convincingly. Irina, thank you very much.
Dmitri, no tsvketoperedacha is not lame: what it is, dried, and such here. This is the Japanese rendition limping soon :)
Transference arguments Irina talk about this imperative.

05.12.2014 8:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Irina! Excellent all chewed, only 1 and 3 point for Chloriola gratissima not suitable. Or is it the color rendition is lame ???

05.12.2014 8:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Svetlana! Thank you very much! Although I am disappointed with the book.

04.12.2014 23:33, Irina Nikulina:

Good. Struggling with confusion) Here are 2 photos, which trace the differences between these species. (And at the same time point out the contrastParacrama dulcissimafrom closely related speciesParacrama latimargo)
dulcissima - http://www.papua-insects.nl/insect%20orders/Lepidoptera/Nolidae/Chloephorinae/Eariadini/Paracrama/Paracrama%20dulcissima.htm
gratissima -http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/150_Chloriola/Chloriola%20gratissima/Chloriola%20gratissima.htm
1. Color: dulcissima - a yellowish-green, gratissima - rich emerald green
2.Transverse bands: dulcissima - plain, light-yellow, subbazalnaya - practically straight, medial - with a small break near the Coast, gratissima - two-tone, brown and white, uneven, with several bends, especially medially.
3.Apekalnaya zone: dulcissima - a light, gray-pink, turning into a narrow toothed zone along the outer edge of the VC, which is the whole length is about the same width (in contrast to the closely related species Paracrama latimargo, where it is wider and has a deep central concavity of the edge http://www.papua-insects.nl/insect%20orders/Lepidoptera/Nolidae/Chloephorinae/Eariadini/Paracrama/Paracrama%20latimargo.htm),
gratissima - black (dark); area along the outer edge of the VC no.So thenChloriola gratissima

04.12.2014 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It would be interesting and very useful to be here for the future clearly defined features of these two species, as their photos on the network going mess.

04.12.2014 23:02, Fedor Ovechkin:

http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35981
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35980
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35979

Ironically, these photos in the gallery displays how exactly certain, but not really certain. Apparently, all three the same instance. If so, it is desirable to combine them into a single group.

04.12.2014 22:05, Fedor Ovechkin:

In Vietnam, it meets Cirrochroa tyche mithila Moore, 1872: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/hel/710170010.html

04.12.2014 21:59, Shamil Murtazin:

there is somewhere in the post, which bonded with the cylinders of the paper tests for drop shadows when photographing butterflies.
good at it. everything is done for about 5 minutes.

04.12.2014 21:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

androkonii edge it?

04.12.2014 21:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sabah + bali

04.12.2014 21:12, Irina Nikulina:

Collate descriptions on mothsofborneo and "Walker F. Catalogue of the heterocerous lepidopterous Insects collected at Sarawak, in Borneo by Mr. AR Wallace, with description on new species // J. Proc. Linn. Soc. (Zool.). - 1862. " ThereChloriola gratissimaThere are three reliable attributive characteristic of these species. If you want to list all later.

04.12.2014 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Exactly. "I do not see any problems" and "standard cone or cylinder made of paper / plastic, inside the object and light soft box of sufficient size" slightly contradict each other: -)

04.12.2014 20:08, Shamil Murtazin:

With the play of all the problems I do not see. Standard cone or cylinder made of paper / plastic, inside the object and light soft box of sufficient size - the effect of daylight will. And if the TTL in general almost nothing is set up. Well, the angle of the flash may add a bit overflows. But not so scary)
While yes, daylight easier.You do not need dancing with a tambourine :)

04.12.2014 19:50, Irina Nikulina:

View more than one, I think. It is necessary to understand. In Paracrama dulcissima in synonyms is
Nolasena dulcissima Walker, [1863], and at Chloriola gratissima in synonyms - Nolasena gratissima Walker, [1863]. But Nolasena dulcissima and Nolasena gratissima - two different kinds http://wallace-online.org/content/frameset?pageseq=1&itemID=WSPEC071&viewtype=side you have to choose p. 76, 334 and 335 types, the description of them are completely different with the instructions especially on ... But why jpmoth.org for both species shows a photo of the same instance - is not clear, though, alas, I am faced with two times recently, studying Risoba.
I looked - and www.mothsofborneo description is completely different.

04.12.2014 19:20, Andrey Kravtsov:

Judging by the lower wing underside closer Perisama philinus

04.12.2014 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another mystery ...Dalima mjoebergi??? for the peninsula is not given.
Involuntarily repeated question asked in molbiol Alexei Yakovlev, almost five years ago:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=371585&view=findpost&p=980433
It so happens that I have to drive a couple of copies. a moth :)

04.12.2014 18:56, Andrey Kravtsov:

At the sight of the top edge is not visible almost, like pokazat.Po my opinion worth it.

04.12.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

04.12.2014 18:43, Andrey Kravtsov:

For ignoramuses looked like a saddle horse

04.12.2014 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

04.12.2014 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well now with no issues: stand of the admin. For Java, see (geography is necessary to add in lux).

04.12.2014 18:12, Andrey Kravtsov:

Apparently (and also the top) -ona.Spasibo!

04.12.2014 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

I just warned against hasty assessments of the results of the search engines.
And why prosecutors immediately below rastrely? Prosecutors have another problem.

04.12.2014 18:06, Andrey Kravtsov:

East-Java-Indonesia

04.12.2014 17:57, Andrey Kravtsov:

Well, obviously not meant lepidoptera.pro! You give a pancake! You rabotat- prosecutor immediately be shot!

04.12.2014 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew poakuratney with statements such as: When you search for something you should always floats to the fore shit, but look without knowing where, do not always have the time. , is now on the first place comes out lepidoptera .pro :)))

04.12.2014 17:50, Andrey Kravtsov:

Do you remember how it all began?
It was the first time and re-started with a pair of all triples very beautiful butterflies, and the realization that this could be a collection comes much later, since its design and the correct label with informatsiey.Poetomu not judge strictly, we total2 year-old then, and so much did not know, could not

04.12.2014 17:36, Alex Dumchus:

And where you buy? Ebee At least some writing labels, at least the country of origin.

04.12.2014 17:35, Andrey Kravtsov:

Just a lot of buy in bulk, in the mix, without any hint of the place and time, and has been for a long time. "I just have the same." - Are you talking about? The site I did not see

04.12.2014 17:30, Andrey Kravtsov:

When there infa -always please When no, alas ...

04.12.2014 17:28, Alex Dumchus:

Not in KMV drink seltzer and pass inspection body. With the current course ye are cheaper. If the situation is normalized, in late January, we want to Tai in Khao Lak.

04.12.2014 17:23, Alexander Belousov:

12 kilometers from the saddle (the most sloping part of the top of the ridge) saddle. Andrew, you can question me on the mountains, in a letter to ask. To komentami not to overload the page. By taking pictures too.

04.12.2014 17:15, Peter Khramov:

A. Well, with iridescent, with them, yes. They fear and terror. Et like chrome any thread to shoot, and sometimes even worse. However, in a studio can always score at the flash and delivery blunt object to the window, or even to any such light.

04.12.2014 17:14, Peter Khramov:

I also ponra.

04.12.2014 17:07, Peter Khramov:

Andrew and labels always such an ambush? One may even publish the Old from the seller?

04.12.2014 17:05, Peter Khramov:

Replacing old with new fotami - just the same photographer and only the same instance, so no hard feelings there can not be. With regards to the requirements - for better Fota unillustrated kind of low quality, than no. And yes, not everyone is interested in photography, and not everyone is interested to grow in this regard.And buy Photoshop or even just learn not everyone wants to (in fact, a normal person and this should not want). Therefore, the requirements can not be. But it will be split galleries on the first and second (secondary) level, if you absolutely refuse - to remove the boom, yes.

04.12.2014 17:01, Peter Khramov:

Looking for something.

04.12.2014 16:51, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Sabah, Sarawak, Sandakan???

04.12.2014 16:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And I go in March. I managed to grab tickets Freestuff in July.

04.12.2014 16:23, Svetlana Shchavelina:

This I had to book a trip to Borneo :)
It can also be found ... And now, with the current exchange rate - not the fact that I shall be going again and ...

04.12.2014 16:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Grab Now where?

04.12.2014 16:12, Alex Dumchus:

Now out, after 10 days will give underside

04.12.2014 16:08, Alex Dumchus:

Simply at me the same. A label Andrei there is almost never :)

04.12.2014 16:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander, I know that you know. But there is no label !!!

04.12.2014 16:05, Alex Dumchus:

Phoebis neocypris

04.12.2014 15:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

dig deeper into the way quickly determine Phoebis-

04.12.2014 15:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This, of course, the right photo!

04.12.2014 15:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why natural picture can be crappy? But I'm Fota your collectible items, as best I can, with fotikom not friends and editors, too. I do not want to be friends, well, it does not pull me. And if my picture is removed, then it is not needed, and I tried to fool !!!

04.12.2014 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There are only two kinds of kind of like:Loepa sikkimathis one.

04.12.2014 14:58, Andrey Kravtsov:

And then all beat around the bush? Peter put their conditions vykladyvanii kollektsionnyhPodcherkivayu collection and not on the nature! shots are certain requirements (it is not a requirement request) -and all by itself will come full circle litter site svoya.Necha different there, "fotami with mobile phones" without rezkozti.Then tighten the time the replacement of the add for the best.Pervosti I have the same errors were, but now I think once is better to sweat during filming, and then in Photoshop, then to not be ashamed of the wasted years! And yet-if you receive a message: "Your poor quality photos will be replaced by a -That "I would not be offended, and once thought to how to make so that your work replace nobody could.Seriously serious website photos!

04.12.2014 14:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I was hoping that you have BUTTERFLIES OF BORNEO, Kazuhisa Otsuka.

04.12.2014 14:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

)))

04.12.2014 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The Moths of Borneo. Part 3 hangs on the network. And here is 2, 13 and 17 but it is necessary !!!

04.12.2014 14:46, Svetlana Shchavelina:

I'll ask him a letter today to scribble.

04.12.2014 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Although not fluorescent. J.D.Holloway. The Moths of Borneo. Part 3, Lasiocampidae ---- Saturniidae, Sphingidae not actually the case?

04.12.2014 14:37, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Alas .... But ... it is necessary to ask the publisher of Natural History Publications (Borneo), I met him in September. If he does not - then I do not know where to look ...

04.12.2014 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Most home: :)
" Homeland: - South America from Colombia and Ecuador to Peru.
"Habitat (biotope, habitat ): tropical forests."

" information on this form to inostrannyhz sites, unfortunately, virtually none. View has many local morphs a little different from each other.Previously, they were part of the kind of Callicore as separate " (((
What is particularly singled out and killed ...... why foreign link led :)
Andrew, finding no need to use Yandex. Use Google :)

04.12.2014 14:20, Andrey Kravtsov:

It was not about color reproduction as a whole, how would it be right to say the transfer of the color iridescent wing sections doksokop.Pri outbreak of refraction only in the direction of green, it does not change the position kamery.Za take advice from a sheet of paper and adjust -spasibo.Uzhe made soon oprobuyu.BB on the machine-Nikon cope

04.12.2014 14:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Haematera pyrame (Hubner, 1819). http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Haematera_pyrame_a.htm

04.12.2014 14:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Svetlana! And on the day of Borneo you have nothing?

04.12.2014 14:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I liked the site and the house without keys. home this is not what this)))

04.12.2014 14:02, Andrey Kravtsov:

I fully agree with Vasily, thank you for criticism, because what's inside uchtu.No Net nobody explains not nado.Pri finding something you should always floats to the fore shit, and not knowing where to look, do not always have vremya.Poetomu and grasping at solominu.Spasibo for http://lepidoptera.ru/community/2328! Until this topic has not yet been reached.As for the label, so the story-just once won a lot of 21, as it was written Callicore mix, most of them still sweating identified, but some people still go without a passport

04.12.2014 13:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

On underside it will clear everything, and you can not peek androkonii. And I caught this kind.

04.12.2014 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Come on, do not boil :) Just had one white monarch top clearly visible thickening. Just where she androkonii below :)

04.12.2014 13:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! You have to explain that to me?

04.12.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For example, the male. It is clearly visible.

04.12.2014 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The female has a comparison here: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30040010.html
In general, I agree. If there's underside (and it is, without doubt) it is necessary and here :)

04.12.2014 13:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If underside circular male.

04.12.2014 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male (androkonii rear wings are clearly visible).

04.12.2014 13:05, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Not at all:)
It is structured by gender, type, photos and descriptions of individuals characteristics of them. Well, see for yourself. Not deeply scientific work, rather - approximately to science educational.

04.12.2014 12:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thank you, Svetlana! I will be glad to any information. Is there no genitals at all? How to identify the species fed in a book?

04.12.2014 12:14, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Genital there is no ...
You in a personal photo? I will try to do a little photo angle has to do, glossy paper, while shooting "head" glare from the flash ....

04.12.2014 11:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Looking for photos, the genitals and the description of the book the following types (if they are there)))
Cirrochroa satellita Butler, 1869
Chersonesia nicevillei Martin, 1895
Sumalia agneya (Doherty, 1891)
Euthalia agnis (Vollenhoven, 1862)
Tanaecia clathrata (Vollenhoven, 1862)
Herona sumatrana Moore, 1881
Deramas alixae Eliot, 1978
Allotinus albifasciatus Eliot, 1980
Allotinus portunus (de Nicéville, 1894)
Miletus heracleion (Doherty, 1891)
Nacaduba solta Eliot, 1955
Arhopala ace de Nicéville, [1893]
Arhopala ammon (Hewitson, 1862)
Arhopala havilandi Bethune-Baker, 1896
Cigaritis kutu (Corbet, 1940)
Catapaecilma elegans (Druce, 1873)
Tajuria inexpectata Eliot, 1973
Artipe anna (Druce, 1896)
Acerbas duris (Mabille, 1883)
Rhode Idmon de Nicéville, 1895

04.12.2014 10:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypanartia lethe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.12.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Until inaccurate although not in the genus similar:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/146_Paracrama/Paracrama%20dulcissima/Paracrama%20dulcissima.htm
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-18/ariolicini/ariolicini_13_1.php
Confusing presence? Like? typeChloriola gratissimaWalker, 1863, standing in another genus:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/150_Chloriola/Chloriola%20gratissima/Chloriola%20gratissima.htm
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-18/ariolicini/ariolicini_15_1.php
Please note that the jpmoth.org ! for both species shows a photo of the same instance! (this speaks of the feet and antennae) (((
That's so lost respect for one of the most popular sites (did not even know who to trust .....
Maybe it's all one type?

04.12.2014 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, there are kind of Appias maria (Semper, 1875) and his three subspecies:
http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/pieridae/pierinae/appias/index.html
Andrew, look at the geography of the species.

04.12.2014 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In moderation it is like Axias venilia (the generic name of an error), and therefore does not lay down, which meant. In fact it should be?Ixias venilia?
Without geography migrate to the form would not venture.

04.12.2014 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As Appias maria dolorosa in the admin it. Again and again without subspecies labels .....
And all kinds: Appias maria does not exist if I am not mistaken. Okay so, huh?
The question of geography edge rises again and then have nowhere to go.

03.12.2014 23:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A couple of ideas
Perisama philinus
Perisama tristrigosa

03.12.2014 23:33, Andrey Kravtsov:

Perisama saussurei? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/Macrolepidoptera15seit_0219.jpg

03.12.2014 23:33, Andrey Kravtsov:

Perisama saussurei? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/70/Macrolepidoptera15seit_0219.jpg

03.12.2014 23:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypanartia lethe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

03.12.2014 23:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Green pingas longer happens - it means

03.12.2014 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bad words expressed, minimize lately :)

03.12.2014 23:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The site is a good one!

03.12.2014 23:26, Peter Khramov:

So they, the wicked!

03.12.2014 23:25, Peter Khramov:

And why instead of "govnosayt" write "Mr. site ...."? If it `s not a secret?

03.12.2014 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is in fact a green :)

03.12.2014 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, let's still try to identify the correct resources, rather than makeshift sites :) g ....
Where did you have such confidence in the subspecies of this instance, which even without geography?
Here, on sound resource painted on all subspecies of this kind:
http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Paulogramma_pyracmon_a.htm
Well, what you really subspecies?
"Label - a passport insect"; "Collection - a label" Behold fundamental to be followed in the preparation of entomological collections.
Without these insects just an object of decoration, "wrapper", "Christmas Toy" and nothing more (
P.S.There is a topic that we try to share links to good resources on the right butterflies:
http://lepidoptera.ru/community/2328
I recommend to read. Since 2011, there has accumulated a lot of useful links which are necessary to be guided in the work, and all this kustarschina the furnace :)

03.12.2014 23:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stas! Do you like all subspecies are. Do it all here.

03.12.2014 23:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tropical without labels will no longer determine the

03.12.2014 23:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Green it should be.

03.12.2014 23:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

03.12.2014 23:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypanartia lethe, where the labels?

03.12.2014 21:51, Andrey Kravtsov:

Yes Ixias! Seller tupit, and I followed him ...

03.12.2014 21:46, Andrey Kravtsov:

so Axias or Ixias? was purchased from http://www.ebay.com/itm/Butterfly-Axias-Venilia-Pair-East-Java-Indonesia-/251719643665?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3a9ba8f211

03.12.2014 19:43, Irina Nikulina:

A rare and unique species of the genus in the RFE Cilix
http://izumoga.com/saninmoth/nakamonkagiba.html
http://www.jpmoth.org/Drepanidae/Drepaninae/Cilix_filipjevi_malivora.html

03.12.2014 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very typical. I do not confuse it with any other representative of the kind of :)
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_9_7.php
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/09_Pingasa/Pingasa%20subviridis/Pingasa%20subviridis.htm

03.12.2014 14:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, like closer Ixias venilia http://www5c.biglobe.ne.jp/~mmmworld/s2/s2s3/s2s3s2/s232_srIxia1.html

03.12.2014 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

03.12.2014 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis tschetverikovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.12.2014 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis tschetverikovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.12.2014 11:07, Svetlana Shchavelina:

The closest - Ixias pyrene yunnanensis, the shape of the rainy season.

03.12.2014 10:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ixias, the label need

03.12.2014 0:54, Peter Khramov:

Focus on the eyes. The recording studio is almost always possible to stretch the DOF and the wings, especially with the standard angle. Color reproduction in the time of the configuration port numbers BB, while normal flash BB just close to the natural "estesstvenno." The closer the object to the sheet of paper - the darker the shade, though smaller in size.The people of the opposite happens very far from the background object assigns to the shadows and the blurred background would not hurt. And in general - often (though not always kanesh) look towards black background.

03.12.2014 0:50, Peter Khramov:

The distance from the seat, what else? ))

02.12.2014 23:45, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

02.12.2014 23:24, Andrey Kravtsov:

Focus is on the wing instead of in the head or abdomen when shooting macro acquitted on 100% .If filming Doxocop flash spoils the color reproduction, changing to blue zelenyy.Odnoznachno needed here filming without flash, but ostalnom- rented with vspyshkoy.Chem closer object a sheet of paper, the less shade!

02.12.2014 23:09, Andrey Kravtsov:

By the way, that means 12 km from the seat?

02.12.2014 23:07, Andrey Kravtsov:

"Black-and-white (in Russian) - it's not two colors" to 50 shades of gray-Go see the film look!

02.12.2014 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Well so then carry safely ...

02.12.2014 19:48, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis tschetverikovi

02.12.2014 19:48, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis tschetverikovi

02.12.2014 19:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

I can not confirm this definition. Only inaccurate and author definition Vladimir Bryukhov .

02.12.2014 19:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

There was an error, here is my answer: With high probability, it is not Adaina microdactyla, pictured in my mind Hellinsia in your region is one kind Hellinsia didactylites. In any case, the photo, without cooking in the group that does not say smile.gif

02.12.2014 19:28, Irina Nikulina:

Do not be scared, it's fixable)

02.12.2014 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

I apologize, I quickly made a mistake. :))

02.12.2014 19:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis thisbe Neptis ilos.

02.12.2014 17:52, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, there Ilos, nothing edited

02.12.2014 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis thisbe / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.12.2014 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis thisbe / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.12.2014 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis tschetverikovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.12.2014 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis tschetverikovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.12.2014 17:34, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis tschetverikovi

02.12.2014 17:34, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis tschetverikovi

02.12.2014 17:34, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis thisbe

02.12.2014 17:33, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis ilos

02.12.2014 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Caloptilia betulicola / Tentatively identified / Nikolai Vladimirov Not identified.

02.12.2014 15:06, Andrey Ponomarev:

In uncertain.

02.12.2014 14:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.12.2014 13:53, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

02.12.2014 11:42, Peter Khramov:

Black-and-white (in Russian) - it's not two colors, but still Greyskeyl (if you do this). White is in the nature. And black too. In general, Stas will let anything and say anything and businesslike.

02.12.2014 11:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter, what it means to black and white ... In fact, the live objects are displayed as they are, not as pleased. Black and White is a two colors: black and white, in nature does not happen. Look palette INFO, Space Lab. What I can not believe my black and white objects, there are always shades, it can not be such and such in life as you write.So here we see a black and white picture, or color version, translated into black and white.

02.12.2014 10:36, Peter Khramov:

If Grandma and life in black and white - do not see any problems, Stas is not the first photographs, then, were the reasons. If it is color - if yes, then a glitch of some sort.

02.12.2014 10:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Not the fact that the original black / white. There are several ways to transfer color version in black and white as belyy..Chёrno photography, worst-case scenario for the eventual corrections.

02.12.2014 7:22, Alexander Belousov:

Peter, that's right. At zero image saturation, it is black and white! Well, maybe just a friend Fotov no! And in general would like to know what it is Kohler?

01.12.2014 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree :))) 95 :)))

01.12.2014 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"The fool - it's just a dissenter" (Arkady and Boris Strugatsky) :)))
In fact, 100% never, but 99, 9 can be easily :)

01.12.2014 21:05, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

01.12.2014 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

01.12.2014 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/28_Barsine/Barsine%20euprepioides/Barsine%20euprepioides.htm

01.12.2014 18:59, Andrey Kravtsov:

By povodu- "And meeting on the sidelines when the smart cop ..." This summer, traveled to the foothills of the Tien Shan Mountains of parnasami.i so at melochi.Zabralis far suddenly meet a ranger-cho You are here with nets, fish catch? -No We butterflies -In some fools! wagged his finger to his temple, and was gone ...

01.12.2014 18:35, Peter Khramov:

And here b / w. This kind which in some original color?

01.12.2014 18:27, Andrey Kravtsov:

I agree with Alexander, and why not in color? In the b / w film shot? Surprised, but not 100%

01.12.2014 18:19, Andrey Kravtsov:

OK

01.12.2014 18:08, Andrey Kravtsov:

Bought at the Costa Rican, but from the pupa where vzyal-?

01.12.2014 17:58, Andrey Kravtsov:

Set to continue, it does not open

01.12.2014 17:31, Andrey Ponomarev:

While the wait.

01.12.2014 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is also erased species that was not in place.

01.12.2014 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

All right turned out, Andrew, the specific name of an error written in the cell where the writing forms and subspecies, I erased it.

01.12.2014 17:17, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, and you changed the last time that such a comment the blasted get?

01.12.2014 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew, are you in a private office, put the number underside.

01.12.2014 17:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

01.12.2014 17:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perisama humboldtii / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.

01.12.2014 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

01.12.2014 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perisama humboldtii / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.

01.12.2014 16:12, Andrey Kravtsov:

-muzhu Wife: 'What are you all foebis yes foebis (Phoebis)! Vaughn have their garden full of jaundice flies! "

01.12.2014 15:48, Andrey Kravtsov:


Lamproptera curia walkeri

01.12.2014 15:47, Andrey Kravtsov:

The underside # 35572

01.12.2014 15:43, Andrey Kravtsov:

I know, I know, everything will give srok.Pytalsya transfer size, as it turned -Don't

01.12.2014 15:41, Andrey Kravtsov:

The underside # 35580

01.12.2014 15:37, Andrey Kravtsov:

Paulogramma pyracmon peristera, Hewitson, 1853 http://dom-bez-kluchey.ru/insectaria/insecta/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae/Biblidinae/Paulogramma-pyracmon-peristera.html

01.12.2014 15:31, Andrey Kravtsov:

Although most Ancyluris aulestes

01.12.2014 15:29, Andrey Kravtsov:

ancyluris meliboeus

01.12.2014 15:24, Andrey Kravtsov: This species is identified correctly.

01.12.2014 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Paulogramma pyracmon.

01.12.2014 15:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

01.12.2014 14:59, Andrey Kravtsov: This species is identified correctly.

01.12.2014 14:52, Andrey Kravtsov: This species is identified correctly.

01.12.2014 13:08, Peter Khramov:

Vasily we about whether you can live a normal life for licenses and small while spending. It turns out you can. A "used" easy to review if "drugs" does not use it, yeah.

01.12.2014 12:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I used to MS Office from the start and nothing else is necessary. Moreover, to find a cure for greed can always :)
I did not Casper, whose dislike for certain moments. A Dr.Web Security Space - litsuha (2340 rubles., 3 companies, one year). And just because they Freestuff keys banyat constantly (

01.12.2014 12:41, Peter Khramov:

With antivirals agree. But Casper is about 1600 rubles. 2 companies. And you, he litsushnye: -) Open Office - is very serious. In MS Office, there is absolutely nothing that would have to be juzverej above average, and that would not be in Open Office. Good and quite a compatible format available. The very use for years, so I know.
Are there many reasons to throw a computer?

01.12.2014 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Like properly transferred, synonyms? or not?

01.12.2014 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Histia rhodope / Alex Dumchus.

01.12.2014 11:50, Andrey Ponomarev:

How copy? Or without labels?

01.12.2014 11:38, Alex Dumchus:

Histia fiabellicornis

01.12.2014 11:26, Alex Dumchus:

Female

01.12.2014 11:25, Alex Dumchus:

Mimoides pausanias

01.12.2014 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The female in my opinion. In mustache. Although difficult to see them, and I could be wrong.

01.12.2014 10:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania militaris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.12.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The exactDysphania militarissimilar to the top of the photo.

01.12.2014 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I think that for an indefinite endemic to Borneo :) Just in case it is necessary to add the kind of Parasa humeralis Walker, 1862 (an author) ......

01.12.2014 9:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not far to seek.
Any juzverej necessary antivirals, which should not be full of holes (this often guilty free). I remember when I was Freestuff Avast, he prespokoynenko so nashalil update the protocol TCP / IP and such cases happen to him often. The solution described here: http://hpc.name/thread/43483/p1.html
Middle juzverej be able to do the recommended surgery?
For a long time has passed switched to a paid DrWeb, which works reliably and trouble with it do not know.
And more than 100 green money is a normal office of the "Borg": http://www.oldi.ru/catalog/element/0212105/ There is a version easier and much cheaper, but I would have stopped this. All there alternative napodobii: http://www.openoffice.org/ru/ serious.

01.12.2014 8:13, Peter Khramov:

As for laughter. Give me one paid program (blood windose), which requires an average horror as juzverej. And one that needs more than the average, and that it is worth much more than $ 100.
Software profiles do not take Prof. discourage a program very quickly, then he and prof.

01.12.2014 1:47, Svetlana Shchavelina:

... otsmatrivaya material ...
At this butterfly look - on a dark background (one half of the wing, which is closer to his chest) have clusters of light scales scattered rarely rest of the surface of the wings (look like tiny light bars). So: where they are perceived as eye congestion tiny droplets of liquid mercury or shiny metal.What was my surprise that this effect in the pictures I found ....

01.12.2014 0:52, Andrey Ponomarev:

No not here soglashus.Nekotoryh butterflies can be determined just by Case consists.

01.12.2014 0:05, Shamil Murtazin:

sorry ... it's very sad :)

30.11.2014 23:33, Fedor Ovechkin:

Scarecrow at night!

30.11.2014 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Well, throw the computer, Kaki problem.

30.11.2014 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nelitsuha? Do not be ridiculous: it's better then throw the computer. After all, one bare-metal will :)
P.S. And I liked the lasso. Just FSH rarely used before.

30.11.2014 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Or even in the uncertain?

30.11.2014 23:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

30.11.2014 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Wow.

30.11.2014 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, not everyone has the desire / opportunity to refine foty. Basil, if you have just discovered the lasso, I propose to throw FSH with the company and not to sin nelitsuhoy. Anyway, you do not need it.Svetlana, in a modern version of Photoshop in a huge number of cases where previously required stamp or hilink, now you can simply select the area, press delete, and select to navigate to adjacent areas of the image. Save, of course, not always, but again, very often, and most importantly - almost in one motion.

30.11.2014 23:13, Peter Khramov:

I mean ... for the following sections of this section is not, and if a caterpillar or a miner sits in Case consists or doll in Case consists, it is still a caterpillar and a chrysalis, and then later in the Case consists. And for the respective types of caterpillars in Case consists Fota will be the norm, as well as for other types without Case consists.
Êàî.The man who seeks Case consists, find them, if you enter the stage and narrow the search to the right of the taxon.
Or am I wrong?

30.11.2014 23:07, Peter Khramov:

When done all the tests. I think everything will be in the week.

30.11.2014 22:30, Svetlana Shchavelina:

And I use the function "Stamp"

30.11.2014 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The newly discovered painting so-called unnecessary "lasso" in Photoshop :)
http://fotoredactor.com/lessons/149-zakrashivaem-chast-izobrazheniya-v-photoshop.html

30.11.2014 21:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Igor, and you function "Eraser" in Photoshop familiar? :))

30.11.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Kind of a big race and choppy, but it, in spite of this, no one be mistaken: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/08_Sterrhinae/04_Chrysocraspeda/Chrysocraspeda%20abhadraca/Chrysocraspeda%20abhadraca.htm (by reference to the first photo of the peninsula).

30.11.2014 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phyllonorycter populifoliella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.11.2014 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phyllonorycter populifoliella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.11.2014 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phyllonorycter populifoliella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.11.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, when species will be possible to add? The thing that constantly require this feature. In particular: now it is necessary to pretend Dindica para Swinhoe, 1891 (it was necessary), and I can not (This is not good.

30.11.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thank you. Revised its definition on the basis set forth below. And I agree with you: the top of the figure is more appropriate to theDindica para, underside and not consistent with Dindica olivacea.
I propose to add the formDindica paraand moved to inaccurate.

30.11.2014 20:03, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you for the clarification, Andrew. Close definitely not silver, some powerful black trees. To track from the beginning, there was a huge number of mines, almost all the leaves were destroyed. (Butterflies removed the leaves of elm - disturbed, flew close to the standing tree)

30.11.2014 19:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cabera pusaria / Andrei Komrakov Cabera exanthemata / Basil Sergienko.

30.11.2014 19:18, Andrey Ponomarev:

"Mass out, literally all the poplar at the house plastered with these crumbs"
What poplar and black?

30.11.2014 19:17, Andrey Ponomarev:

If proximity is not growing poplar white-Populus alba, then we can with high probability to say that this Phyllonorycter populifoliella, because Phyllonorycter comparella mine leaves Populus alba.

30.11.2014 19:13, Andrey Ponomarev:

No it is not the traces of life, it's lower side in which the mine is alive and that the caterpillar develops into ney.Izvlechennaya from his home caterpillar dies.

30.11.2014 18:41, Irina Nikulina:

In connection with the supplied today Ponomareva photo # 35772 back to this and two neighboring - # 32579 and # 32577, and once again reviewed all species of the genus (8 reg) and 8-10 from neighboring reg. Only populifoliella http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Phyllonorycter_Populifoliella the screen. Just in case, and a close look at the picture comparella (reg 9), who also develops on poplar.But they are well differentiated by shape gray-brown spots (areas) - they have populifoliella http://www.lepiforum.de/2_forum.pl?md=read;id=41608 substantially square, whereas in comparella - narrow rectangular More http://www.lepiforum.de/2_forum.pl?md=read;id=41606 more confidence in his summer determination.

30.11.2014 17:33, Peter Khramov:

Mmm. And should we not be more true of life?

30.11.2014 17:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Caloptilia elongella / Vasiliy Feoktistov Caloptilia populetorum / Andrey Ponomarev.

30.11.2014 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Keep. It is better to send in to the inaccurateCaloptilia populetorum.
It feeds on birch kind, and they are growing under the windows. And if we start from a specific name still tends to poplar. And I have full poplar yard :)

30.11.2014 11:53, Andrey Ponomarev:

Unfortunately the normal instances when photographing fled.
The next year will have to be repeated. :-)

30.11.2014 11:49, Andrey Ponomarev:

Not bad to add the following items: a cocoon mine Case consists

30.11.2014 11:35, Andrey Ponomarev:

On this photo you can write the same thing.
Pinpoint Caloptilia elongella from Caloptilia betulicola possible only on the genitals or the output of the tracks, one feeds on the other in the alder birch.

30.11.2014 11:34, Andrey Ponomarev:

In this picture there are doubts, it is probably Caloptilia populetorum.
Pinpoint Caloptilia elongella from Caloptilia betulicola possible only on the genitals or the output of the tracks, one on another on a birch alder.

30.11.2014 9:49, Basil Sergienko:

exanthemata

30.11.2014 1:24, Andrey Ponomarev:

On grasses

29.11.2014 23:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Risoba glauca / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.11.2014 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew done. Punctual :) If a butterfly, a certain Alexander made yayki, hence their determination belongs to Alexander. Iron logic :)

29.11.2014 22:37, Peter Khramov:

The genus Pontia. Business somehow.

29.11.2014 21:36, Irina Nikulina:

I'd looked up just in case - to be sure) More andRisoba viridangulataamong the many species Risoba 3-4 looks very similar to Risoba glauca, the difference in the structure of the male genitalia. No information is for these types of very little - except for the two sites are not very good with small illustrations do in general not. But mothsofborneo.com has a detailed description with a clear indication of the outer defining characteristics of the two species. Although it is clear that all the same to her to be inaccurate)

29.11.2014 21:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

That I do not specify :)))

29.11.2014 21:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

29.11.2014 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Alexandr Zhakov.

29.11.2014 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

29.11.2014 21:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Risoba glauca / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.11.2014 21:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Risoba walshae / Tentatively identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

29.11.2014 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It also Risoba. As http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21197
I think in theRisoba glauca: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=368959 on the rear wings basically. Here, too, need more photos on the network (

29.11.2014 20:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Still bug. And I was sure that a feature!
Although in reality: which is then output the image? ..

29.11.2014 20:01, Shamil Murtazin:

What a merry goose :)
How and on what is collected?

29.11.2014 19:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

29.11.2014 15:35, Peter Khramov:

Yes, everything is fine, it is still in the future it will be necessary to make up the ability to bind to higher taxa.

29.11.2014 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, this happens if the load in the uncertainty over the tab "Download site" file, only the names of the generic name. It is automatically created with only one type of the generic name (
And I was a few times. I had to wipe the title in LK kind that is prescribed as a species name.

29.11.2014 13:15, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pontia / Confidently identified / Fedor Ovechkin Not identified.

29.11.2014 10:57, Fedor Ovechkin:

Rod put down automatically because it was in the file name: pontia.jpg. The only pity is that the page kind of photos are not recognized. The situation is deadlocked. Rhode reliably known species belong in question appears in the photos exactly certain, but it will not see anywhere else and you will not find on the search, if you do not know the identification number.

29.11.2014 10:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Wow ... just kind of put down :)
You distribute the more beautiful Pontius? ))

29.11.2014 9:32, Stan Korb:

Pontia daplidice. It is believed that edusa and daplidice - one type, but two different subspecies. Edusa described from the Kiel in Austria daplidika - from North Africa. Accordingly, we - Pontia daplidice edusa, and on yugah - nominative.

28.11.2014 22:04, Irina Nikulina:

That's right, Fyodor, is on the left in Latin - dzidzula (s) and dzidzina)) On the right, you can hear the translation into Russian)

28.11.2014 21:36, Fedor Ovechkin:

I tried, no matter how strange, but I heard dzidzulya! ;)

28.11.2014 21:21, Irina Nikulina:

And not try to ask Google translator and Latin pronounce the translation and voice :))? Funny translation - tsiSula and tsiZina))

28.11.2014 20:22, Peter Khramov:

If blue, then edusa.

28.11.2014 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

28.11.2014 20:14, Fedor Ovechkin:

Pontia edusa or Pontia daplidice?

28.11.2014 19:46, Fedor Ovechkin:

This photo at the same time is here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8851 here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8852

28.11.2014 16:00, Fedor Ovechkin:

Indeed, ambiguous, until you know that meant calling, you will not understand how to correctly pronounce!

28.11.2014 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Interesting question. For me as if you dig, the more likely it will Zizzulya and Zizzina. Well, if you finally can be Orthodox, you have to give a name originally was something like Cisula.

28.11.2014 13:38, Fedor Ovechkin:

From Latin, probably wise to "tsitsulya" and "Tsitsin."

28.11.2014 13:13, Alexander Belousov:

Prosvyatite where his residence?

28.11.2014 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Report date was? Now it seems to be the rules.

28.11.2014 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Zizulya and zizinho.

28.11.2014 12:45, Peter Khramov:

At the time being inaccurate.

28.11.2014 12:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zizula hylax / Tentatively identified / Fedor Ovechkin.

28.11.2014 12:41, Irina Nikulina:

My view is also unprofessional, but to deal with this kind of as Svetlana added to the page type http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/50976 description, which clearly indicated the differences of species Zizula hylax Zizina otis, with which it is often confused + characteristic for the kind of "comma" at the underside VC.According to believe that there reallyZizula hylax- one of the smallest butterfly in the world) in only 2 years old type, but Zizula cyna (Edwards, 1881) - American views. In Vietnam - Z. h. hylax http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lyc4/80940001.html

28.11.2014 11:50, Irina Nikulina:

Please, Peter, went through the DV gently and just in case I give all this without inf .:
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23078
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23154
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23087
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23155
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23261
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23088
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23080
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23208

28.11.2014 11:35, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha looked yesterday all possible Bombycidae, also had 2 options, which looked in detail, but it did not work with them. A «carnea species-group» in species like figure at the apex is typical 2 dark spot in the lower corner of the VC, the lower slightly larger top. Have a look, please. Of the 5 species of this group, only 2 - carnea and griseotincta - indicated for Malaysia. But griseotincta lighter
http://digileps.biology.nsysu.edu.tw/digilep_alpha/public/zh/specimen.php? synonymID = 551 A carnea named the most common type («Far the commonest»)

28.11.2014 10:28, Fedor Ovechkin:

Dear experts, please pay attention to this picture! In my unprofessional opinion, it depicted a butterfly on it is no different from this: http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/zizula/pygmaea-1v.jpg. Maybe you need more information? Is it possible to define a species?

28.11.2014 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There was suspicion on them. Even on genus and species in it ... the most suitable option Irene. A detailed explanation can tomorrow. Today there is no such possibility.

28.11.2014 9:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, and a European? http://lepidoptera.ru not believe :))
By mothsofborneo.com you yourself have repeatedly expressed doubt that he was not consistent with your answer choice, but there are images of the genitals, that's the key to a guaranteed definition.
http: //www.boldsystems.org American and there (repeat) under that specific name of three butterflies, and only one corresponds to your images. But as already wrote in the family for more than 20 kinds of spread and images that we do not know at the previous site only 3 types, and this is bad.
The fact that you have two identical butterflies in general about what does not speak.Yes, I agree that they comply with one of the image and of http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=588678 http://www.mothsofborneo.com. but this is the only image on the network, and with determination in this case, you have to be careful and not definitive.Basil, we are not on your nelly not want to detract from your determination, your just categorical judgment in this case does not work, and in case of an error site brings negative effect.

28.11.2014 8:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is one of Bombycidae :) in my opinion.

28.11.2014 6:24, Alexander Belousov:

I agree with Irina, too long reading lists where there are few, and so will be more accurate. Resources to developing, improving and it is encouraging!

28.11.2014 6:18, Alexander Belousov:

Stanislav, how much in a time machine taking? Really in 2026 these will fly :-)

28.11.2014 5:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, that's it: it may fit, it may not fit under any of the options. At present, of the three, I do not see any resemblance with one of the other two and, therefore, put into precise. Especially look, in my opinion very maloizmenchivy: loaded a second copy., Who looks almost indistinguishable from the first. Maybe later, and will be the third, it is necessary to dig (not rule)...... At the moment, options do not see and do not know will they ever (
I would be very grateful to anyone who tells me to these specific embodiments having at least some resemblance to the parsed butterfly ...This will serve as a basis for transfer to inaccurate or even in a different kind of :)
Two well-respected resource (one European, and one Asian) is exactly the same in the butterfly is accurate (inaccurate not there) :)
Example:
We trust these resources in the definition of the same Antheraea rosieri (Toxopeus, 1940):
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/saturniidae/saturniidae_2_11.php
http: // lepidoptera.ru / taxonomy / 65559
Although the genus Antheraea (Hubner, 1819) is huge, divided into five subgenera and species in it are often highly variable in appearance ..... Somehow, in this case, the question does not arise?
And in the case of the butterfly trust these resources can not. That's what I do not understand (

28.11.2014 4:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Irene. Apparently the point :) In my opinion it is.

28.11.2014 3:23, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it can be anywhere. An example would be one place to start.

28.11.2014 2:21, Irina Nikulina:

Oreta carnea ? http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/70_DREPANOIDEA/Drepanidae/03_Drepaninae/28_Oreta/Oreta%20carnea/Oreta%20carnea.htm

28.11.2014 1:46, Irina Nikulina:

Very convenient and equally clearly, it seems to me. And there is no excess. Thank you!

28.11.2014 1:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Magneuptychia libye / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.11.2014 1:35, Irina Nikulina:

Peter is at once caught at least 5 species among the most familiar to me, open freely, where information about the user who first added the views of the site is absent. It will be added gradually or on such types should be reported?

28.11.2014 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Now in these sections and displays information about the user who first added the views of the site, as well as the source based on which kind of added. Since accounting system did not work properly from the start site, in the infe for older types may be malfunctioning (though I tried the most of them excluded).Because if anyone noticed improper, remember that something is added, he is not the one who is indicated on the form page, do not hesitate to inform - will rule.
Particular attention is paid to ask the cases when the source contains the old version Lepidoptera.ru.Very good Whatever the source of change to a more correct, and if the author is incorrect, then it too.

27.11.2014 23:21, Irina Nikulina:

I do not know whether there fourth opinions, but I read all the correspondence - and was going to write, but it is going, Peter voiced in his last comments all my thoughts) Usually, offering definition, ask the moderators to put in inaccurate when understand complex ET-species even if only one of the possible variants not found.Or not proven that it can be eliminated. It was not time, and rightly so.

27.11.2014 23:10, Peter Khramov:

The genus 20 species. From them we have information to 3. We assume that the 3 most common. Our species is suitable for one of these three. But perhaps it is suitable and under some of the 17 we do not know. So, definition inaccurate. Somewhere I wrong?
And yes. If other fotami the same situation - they are too inaccurate. But the situation is not all of the tropics.Do not exaggerate.

27.11.2014 22:54, Irina Nikulina:

What an example underside alaopis? - On mothsofborneo and so is an indication of the characteristic differences between the underside of several species and just released underside alaopis, but just compare. with two similar species. And I was just embarrassed that underside olivacea here http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/12_Dindica/Dindica%20olivacea/Dindica%20olivacea.htm completely different. Yellow color - just at the base of the Tax Code.And the top is different - there is no yellow spot at the anal angle of the Tax Code, which is available by the host image and all images are para http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=141319

27.11.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, the options on the network does not (try typing "Odontodes"), Besides from these two, who swept aside at once :)
So far, all I see is an accurate description. This approach can put in all the tropical inaccurate, because the options do not know? Or forever undefined? Sad but true (

27.11.2014 22:39, Peter Khramov:

In these 3 types of sources in this way. If they are really only 3, then we know the problems. But if there are still 20 instead of 3, why you need to look only these three? If they are the most common, or that is in this spirit - then again up to a maximum of inaccurate pulls, is not it?

27.11.2014 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fact that this "sort of way" is the two links at a fairly respected resources that I brought in my very first post :) I have now, as you can see are these types of which all but with every second problem arises becausethat rarely catches trails in their (more and more "pop" any) and ignorance of (two or three images on a good resource in this case is already very good.

27.11.2014 22:17, Peter Khramov:

Basil, like it is, but as it is not so. After the images are not available for all types (if the image is determined by).

27.11.2014 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Test commenced interfaces for curators of collections. At this time, the addition of new taxa fukntsii disabled.

27.11.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On underside (or rather by the presence of black spots on the underside of the upper wing) and then about. The underside of these species are very different.
Example underside of the second type, which is in abundance on the site: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27339
Dindica para I saw on top, but in the absence of ispod stopped at Dindica olivacea and therefore put in inaccurate.

27.11.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, sent in inaccurate when there are specific variants (types of very similar appearance). I do not see those, though born big. Will they provided, then and will talk about the transfer to inaccurate :)

27.11.2014 22:05, Peter Khramov:

What person develops web interface; -)

27.11.2014 22:04, Peter Khramov:

I suggest not to bathe. Soon I completed yet interface for curators taxa, and Stas himself all can move, where it sees fit.

27.11.2014 22:02, Peter Khramov:

Why is not discussing. I now propose to send inaccurate.

27.11.2014 22:01, Peter Khramov:

Now, instead of the format "Author innformatsii source, the year" will be used bracketed number source, for example, as follows: [9]. At the same time the full name of the source is available by pointing the mouse on the plus brackets in the references at the bottom of the form (as well as, by itself, in the section literature at the site).This option is a little less obvious, but since literature adds a lot of users, and not all of them do it correctly, the display will be a lesser evil compared to the blasted captions.

27.11.2014 21:50, Irina Nikulina:

While only a question - why, on what grounds it Dindica olivacea, instead Dindica para, for example, http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=141319? Moreover, there is a subspecies of the Malaysian Dindica para malayana Inoue, 1990 http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=590489
http://www.gbif.org/species/118714241

27.11.2014 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

I also explained below :) go around. :)) No further diskussiruem all all told, each left to his own. I urge to be careful in these definitions have not had the opportunity to make sure that the seemingly 100% accurate definition, had to change. :)))

27.11.2014 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, if the authors were always right, it would not be synonyms. ;))

27.11.2014 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Refine year description, and type the author wrote in 2004, and the Global Names Index 2003 :)))

27.11.2014 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On the Global Names Index (there in the sources) - a separate species. The more photos uploaded pervoopisatelem. Grounds enough

27.11.2014 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I do not see any options. The following explains why :)
P.S. If the network has a minimum of pictures, it does not mean that the form incorrectly defined :) Especially to a minimum it is possible to trust.

27.11.2014 20:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Who has made the form Colias grieshuberi, and will let Paralasa alajense Korb, 2004. I have no literature. View is written above, the second line shows the subspecies, well be the typical subspecies, I think it is not scary. :)

27.11.2014 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

The question of how well the form is defined and how to identify :))

27.11.2014 20:15, Peter Khramov:

With regard to the authorship of pictures of Andrey discussed everything, will now only images taken by the author himself. Andrew, if you still have your gallery foty from third party resources - in the comments below them sign it, I poudalyat.

27.11.2014 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To help Google with a little picture of this type :)

27.11.2014 19:19, Stan Korb:

Questions not here. Traktovateli had never cooked genitals are not the types that these taxa, but even just the European copies. They have no idea that there are sibling species.

27.11.2014 19:18, Stan Korb:

what kind of data without the kind of pictures?

27.11.2014 18:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

To carry Polyommatus juldusa (Staudinger, 1886) or Polyommatus iphigenia (Herrich-Schaffer, 1847) or Polyommatus rueckbeili (Forster, 1960), which is not in the catalog?

27.11.2014 18:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

View, which is described subspecies, treated as a subspecies in most databases: rueckbeili Forster, 1960 to the species Polyommatus juldusa, Agrodiaetus iphigenia. to include any type of data subtypes?

27.11.2014 18:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Stanislav signing species names are not visible because they are not in the catalog, I'll give them that would be visible to everyone, but to create taxa to species rank or not then we'll decide. :)

27.11.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.11.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.11.2014 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here, the big question taxon grieshuberi Korb, 2004 as a kind of description, interpreted later as a subspecies of Colias hyale, subspecies Colias alta and synonym Colias hyale hyale. Who else is looking. :))) I can not figure it out.

27.11.2014 17:40, Stan Korb:

View Colias grieshuberi

27.11.2014 17:38, Stan Korb:

It depends on how seriously to take photos Churkino audit types in this group;). If adequately - that species.

27.11.2014 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Colias grieshuberi Korb, 2004 I can not understand how and where to add.

27.11.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the admin they are. It is necessary to dig ....

27.11.2014 16:47, Yuri Semejkin:

And what is confirmed?

27.11.2014 16:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

The specific name?

27.11.2014 16:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Super. :)
A view of what?

27.11.2014 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Full title?

27.11.2014 14:44, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

27.11.2014 12:11, Andrey Kravtsov: This species is identified correctly.

27.11.2014 12:11, Andrey Kravtsov: This species is identified correctly.

27.11.2014 11:40, Andrey Kravtsov:

Thank you, Stanislav!

27.11.2014 10:57, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

27.11.2014 10:51, Stan Korb:

It corybas. phoebus now - this is what was once Ariadne

27.11.2014 8:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia turanica / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.

27.11.2014 8:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia turanica / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.

27.11.2014 6:37, Alexander Belousov:

This self ;-)

27.11.2014 6:34, Alexander Belousov:

ssp. laeta

26.11.2014 23:19, Stan Korb:

Erebia turanica

26.11.2014 23:18, Stan Korb:

Erebia turanica

26.11.2014 20:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.11.2014 20:28, Andrey Kravtsov:

Wrong, wildly sorry, bought from Costa Rican.

26.11.2014 20:21, Alex Dumchus:

Well Kr.kniga- understand - and some others that can not be caught? Peter. Give at least some link. And what that means. Administrativka? And when meeting in the fields of smart cop ....

26.11.2014 20:05, Alex Dumchus:

Paulogramma peristera

26.11.2014 19:16, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Andrew, do you have such high-quality photos, but viewed fingers - somehow not comme il faut .... be stuck in something pin something ....
I also have have a few photos with butterflies on her hand, but they're alive, is another story .............

26.11.2014 18:47, Peter Khramov:

theme discus gone far away and does not concern an instance in the picture: p Yes Fota still bad, and the author posted just to determine, so that even pomusolit in the comments - all good. Well, it is. You wonder about the Red Book of something. The book is a book, and we all fishing is prohibited for private collections. Nasekomyshey any species, including Pieris rapae and mosquitoes.Well, what the severity / debility laws neutralized optional - floor of course.

26.11.2014 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.11.2014 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.11.2014 17:58, Irina Nikulina:

Story...! This, apparently, during his second expedition to the Far East Alexey collected. Three years later there was a third, and then to the final move to the Far East, where he lived for more than 40 years .. Well preserved a female. Valuable copy!

26.11.2014 17:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew, you have all the butterflies without labels?

26.11.2014 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

26.11.2014 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achrosis excitata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2014 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achrosis excitata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2014 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm kidding, I showed the same language :))) Communicate, Peter is clean :)))

26.11.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There, there it is, my dear :) Every summer, as the waves away from mosquitoes, but she's there :)

26.11.2014 17:10, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. I unfortunately computer this site does not open (dr.Vebb monitors). xanthomelas and that too in the book ?? I did not know - the year before increased by three generations of my apple.
Alexander Zhakov - let people talk, when the theme will run out - you can just delete it.

26.11.2014 16:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Topic discus gone far away and does not concern an instance in the picture: p

26.11.2014 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, this is meant: http://www.ugolovnyi-advokat.ru/okruzhayushhaya-sreda/otvetstvennost-za-oxotu-na-zhivotnyx.html?
Few knows :) Including people who have for catch engage. Thank God the cops have not Prochukhan and did not catch someone or falling for someNymphalis xanthomelas, which we Prorva and in spite of that she on some misunderstanding in QC MO is: http: //kkmo2.verhovye. ru / rb / bspozvon / nymphalis_xanthomelas.php
Her car is on the road in batches knock ......... How many die from adverse environmental conditions?
As caught ignoring these absurd moments, and I will catch :)

26.11.2014 16:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, I have already said that doing just shooting. No collector veins in me, I do not collect butterflies. Tropical rented in so far as, it is a wonder we have. And then they started to shoot only because of the appearance in the city of Butterfly House.
If you look here on the site, I have basically just our Far East, part of the house is grown.Then, either let them go or give in BPI. So, for someone else's butterflies in glass boxes I did not chase. So sometimes schёlknu for interest.

26.11.2014 16:01, Peter Khramov:

Before you start fishing in Russia rekomendut familiar with the legislation in this area the best country in the world.

26.11.2014 15:57, Alex Dumchus:

Yuri. You have a chic edge. So many beautiful views both day and night, there's probably nowhere on the entire territory of the former USSR. And you Fota FOREIGN butterflies in glass boxes. Take fishing! And there, and their butterflies increase. For example, I regularly change my tropical butterflies ET.
If you need help with advice, help.

26.11.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here mystery.
Earlier in the race was the only kind of Monodecus admirandus Whalley (1976) with a subspecies of Monodecus admirandus capillatus Whalley, 1976 : http://eol.org/pages/30672608/overview
Then they sort of split into two separate species.
Monodecus admirandus Whalley (1976) : http://pyralidsofborneo.org/index.php?monodecus-admirandus-whalley-1976plate-8rts-409
Monodecus capillatus Whalley, 1976 : http://pyralidsofborneo.org/index.php?monodecus-capillatus-whalley-1976plate-8rts-4081
I have previously exhibited in 2 copies inaccurate. butterflies, believing that they are closer toMonodecus capillatus.
But this specimen. differs from them looks pretty strong.Perhaps it is preciselyMonodecus admirandus?
What do you think about this?

26.11.2014 14:29, Yuri Semejkin:

There is also shot through the glass, but it seems able to draw a picture.

26.11.2014 14:27, Yuri Semejkin:

I read the comments. All right a little. Butterflies valid under glass boxes that are attached to the wall. To remove the lid of the box and of course no permits. Everything is closed curtains from sunlight. The labels are on each butterfly, but rarely seen through the glass, what is written there.Butterfly took off for the title, and now you can remove. Floods site like poor quality pictures are not going at all, something to shoot through the glass no longer want. But sometimes, when more or less, and may throw off.

26.11.2014 13:53, Alex Dumchus:

I am sure that in the framework of a butterfly hanging on a wall - as an element of decor. On the back of each frame name plate. But that's no frame allowed to touch.

26.11.2014 13:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is strange why was neopredёnnym largest sailing vessel in the world :)
Famous African species. Riddle .....

26.11.2014 13:09, Peter Khramov:

It's not in the glass, of course. Strange else that was kind of nepredelenny from the entomological collection of the BPI. If it is true they have there indefinitely, then the meaning was very load: -)

26.11.2014 13:03, Alex Dumchus:

A sense of Fota, when the site has enough quality photo ????

26.11.2014 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.11.2014 12:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.11.2014 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Through the glass must (

26.11.2014 9:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Quality :(

26.11.2014 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio antimachus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2014 9:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypolimnas dexithea / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.11.2014 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio antimachus

25.11.2014 21:10, Alex Dumchus:

Lamproptera curius ???

25.11.2014 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pingasa ruginaria?

25.11.2014 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pingasa ruginaria?

25.11.2014 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Nope sites across Asia. And Europe is not present.

25.11.2014 17:58, Irina Nikulina:

On pictures online really closer to excitata, and finds the form closest to Peninsular Malaysia, although incitata excitata and very similar in appearance. I read on mothsofborneo: the so-called incitata Walker complex includes a number of species, some of which are generally regarded as subspecies incitata, but were found significant differences in the structure of the genitalia, and they were identified in the DTD. kinds.This complex consists of the following. taxa: A. incitata Walker (Himalayas Gonkng, Thailand), A. serpentinaria Walker (Sri Lanka), A. pallida Moore (Andaman Islands), A. innotata Warren (o.Penang), A.excitata (about .Sumatra), A. recitata (Island of Borneo, Sumatra), A. purpurascens (o.Engano) All these types of well differ only in the genitals. So only inaccurate

25.11.2014 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I decided to download a second, the last copies. this rare, major and his unique moth.
You would not say that it is mikrocheshuekryloe :)

25.11.2014 17:30, Alex Dumchus:

Hypolimnas dexithea

25.11.2014 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/04_NOLIDAE/02_CHLOEPHORINAE/091_Chloroplaga/Chloroplaga_nygmia/Chloroplaga_nygmia.htm

25.11.2014 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is male. Now a female and put too imprecise :)

25.11.2014 16:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! Sites that are good, but it's Europe. What -nibud like Asia have?

25.11.2014 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Achrosis sp. Most of all I looked likeAchrosis excitata, but despite this has put in limbo. Confused distribution. And she can not do it?

25.11.2014 14:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Svetlana Shchavelina.

25.11.2014 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put please group, defined according to the author's comment :).
When the transfer, I have not looked back and identified himself.

25.11.2014 8:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.11.2014 8:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania militaris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.11.2014 8:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dysphania militaris / Pavel Kirillov Dysphania subrepleta / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.11.2014 1:51, Irina Nikulina:

I think it is unlikely, "easily the third") Dysphania In species have very specific external differences. The Diagnosis to subrepleta said that the species of militaris sagana and it has a more saturated deep yellow color and a much more extensive black pattern. Here is a copy of subrepleta Sumatra http://www.fobi.web.id/key/Geometridae?g2_itemId=24469

25.11.2014 1:11, Irina Nikulina:

I agree with the definition of Basil. This kind of well distinguishable from similar species sagana subrepleta and a number of features described in
Diagnosis http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini/dysphaniini_1_2.php

25.11.2014 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Do not remove and utoschit in habitats where there is such a category in the gallery.

24.11.2014 23:24, Andrey Ponomarev:

Remove

24.11.2014 23:06, Shamil Murtazin:

put a "doll."

24.11.2014 22:46, Peter Khramov:

Well, he also says that it is necessary to mold a separate section in the Trouble than a ...

24.11.2014 22:05, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander gave the example of a site where all of one kind piled together on the same page - it's good! ... but only for a limited number of species.

24.11.2014 21:40, Peter Khramov:

What is the argument? You both agree that habitats are necessary in a separate branch of the gallery.

24.11.2014 18:53, Alex Dumchus:

Looked site, Alexander. Good site, but .... I repeat - it is for a limited number of species.
And we decided to grasp the immensity. Remind me -diletantu how many species can ohvatit- 200-300 thousand.Now let's multiply by males and females, stage of development, underside and habitats for each species - metagalaxy!
Stand by my opinion, has to be cleaned and let the extra photo will not be offended at me authors.

24.11.2014 18:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Phyllonorycter_Monspessulanella
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Archon_Apollinus - an example of a good site and delivering it to the material. :))
When it is determined by comparing only the pictures, that this definition is only approximate. Determines: appearance, size, genitals preimaginal phase of the scattering and feed; auxiliary geography, phenology and habitats.:))) I repeat: This site only habitat section discusses wait until the ship habitats massively. :))

24.11.2014 18:07, Irina Nikulina:

Anacampsis blattariella ?

24.11.2014 17:54, Alex Dumchus:

I guess I have not seen that "a number of good sites." On those (as I believe) a good website that I use to determine - only the adult stage. To determine the butterflies no longer need, well, maybe even a caterpillar in disputed matters. We fully embrace Lepidoptera! And not some finite series, such as a butterfly or the Caucasus, Moscow region.Think about how much useless, not informative ph tomorrow on the site. Dump.! If you want - I'll post all of their habitats. But who cares? Still, I - for the cleanliness of the site. Therefore govoryu- that ship better in a separate folder. Who cares - look.

24.11.2014 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, not in the list of steps or exuviae or habitat.
The program puts a gun imago. :)))

24.11.2014 17:24, Alexander Belousov:

In my opinion, the imago has gone out!

24.11.2014 17:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, Andrew download the full set of photos of a particular kind. This is done on a number of good sites. This site only habitat section discusses wait until the ship habitats massively. :))

24.11.2014 17:05, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. I think it is necessary to identify habitats in a separate folder. Well, not only is the specified type is found only there. If you give a picture of habitat tropikam- so there is from 50 to 100 species in one picture will be sitting, and maybe more.This is something to get 100 kinds of a picture? And for each type, I'll be there to catch the ship one or two pictures? Gallery landscapes! Peter, you skazhi- and we start - to load another schazz 10000 ph nature on the website. I have a shitload of pictures in a computer ... :)

24.11.2014 16:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena thersamon / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.11.2014 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieris napi / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.11.2014 16:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pontia daplidice / Confidently identified / Pavel Ivanov Not identified.

24.11.2014 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaecia iapis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.11.2014 14:13, Yuri Semejkin:

It seems to have a definition, and in view of uncertain numbers?

24.11.2014 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

24.11.2014 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Inattentive. Apologize :)

24.11.2014 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

24.11.2014 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They should in all inaccurate.

24.11.2014 8:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Athyma / Tentatively identified / Andrey Kravtsov Not identified.

24.11.2014 8:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Banisia fenestrifera / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.11.2014 8:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Banisia fenestrifera / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.11.2014 8:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Banisia myrsusalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Banisia fenestrifera / Irina Nikulina.

24.11.2014 8:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Banisia myrsusalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Banisia fenestrifera / Irina Nikulina.

24.11.2014 8:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Banisia myrsusalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Banisia fenestrifera / Irina Nikulina.

24.11.2014 8:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Banisia myrsusalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Banisia fenestrifera / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2014 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I absolutely agree with Irina. It must be carried in inaccurateBanisia fenestrifera

23.11.2014 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

TheBanisia fenestrifera

23.11.2014 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

TheBanisia fenestrifera

23.11.2014 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

TheBanisia fenestrifera

23.11.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree with more than convincing arguments. It is necessary to correct my mistake and move all 4 copies. (including this one) to theBanisia fenestrifera, but also just inaccurate.

23.11.2014 22:53, Irina Nikulina:

Banisia fenestrifera - explanation in the discussion to the photo # 35262

23.11.2014 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Banisia myrsusalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Banisia fenestrifera / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2014 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Banisia myrsusalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Banisia fenestrifera / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2014 21:50, Irina Nikulina:

And rightly so, that did not dare to - about the size of everything is discussed. That's about this image I wrote in the discussion to the photo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35262 - option Banisia fenestrifera to the lack of spots on the VC, I think

23.11.2014 21:39, Irina Nikulina:

Now I can answer in detail) yesterday read all of Southeast Asia-species - geographical distribution (including the height above sea level), the size of the individuals, the presence and appearance, size and number of bright spots, color bahromok NK and BK (he in nekot.kinds of different), and I think that from an examination can exclude all small species lobata, myrsusalis, idalialis, owadai, ryukyuensis, as well as larger, but not suitable for others. characteristic features - intonsa, ovifera, flavidiscalis, cyclothyris (each can explain more, if needed).Of the remaining three, the most suitable size, would eliminate more and myrtaea - he is dark-reddish brown and has a characteristic hallmark is the presence of three large spots in the center of the PC (sometimes two joined together). In addition, the species is found in low-lying district tries and to the heights of 600m.I would have stopped at the Banisia fenestrifera The size indicated on pyralidsofborneo (27cm), do not bother, because on the other. sites - «The wingspan is about 3 cms».A cluster of white and yellowish spots is precisely this characteristic form, as your shots, while indicating that the magnitude and the number of them varies considerably, but often there is a combination of three different-sized white spots with small yellowish, related http: // catalog .digitalarchives.tw / item / 00 / 5b / 0a / a5.html Sometimes these spots generally are virtually absent, as in the past you put the photo http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/5b/0d/43.html In addition, in contrast to all other species, this species is found up to an altitude 2000m.
As for the remaining Banisia strigigrapha, its habitat, mostly, «lowland and lower montane forest», up to an altitude of 1500m, and has a red shade of the wings (red-orange-brown) and a pale fringe.Some copies. - Only one, but a large oval spot on the VC, sometimes the bottom joins one small.
In general, it is necessary to do ... views in one of Southeast Asia at least 15.

23.11.2014 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's Ethmia, I say. With the scope to more than 4 centimeters. You can take over a large lishaynitsu)
Mistakes can not be:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/20_GELECHIOIDEA/Ethmiidae/Ethmia%20palawana/Ethmia%20palawana.htm
It is there one :)

23.11.2014 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

23.11.2014 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

23.11.2014 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, very much dead life.

23.11.2014 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrausta purpuralis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.11.2014 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hesudra divisa?
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/02_Hesudra/Hesudra%20divisa/Hesudra%20divisa.htm
Confused lack in the area of ​​the peninsula.

23.11.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's a pity there is no male (
With determination everything is very simple. From related species Monosyntaxis trimaculata Hampson, 1900 is characterized primarily dark tops and bordering the hind wings. Arel so as wider than the M. trimaculata.
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-7/plesiomorphic%20genera/plesiomorphic_4_2.php (M. trimfculata to have to go to the link).

23.11.2014 14:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichosea champa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2014 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichosea champa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.11.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I fully agree with Irina. It is necessary to put in inaccurateTrichosea champato the new amendments, if any, will be :) Too many rummaged through it.

23.11.2014 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pretending relying on Vasilenko: http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/Geometr/larent.htm
You can transfer :)

23.11.2014 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Earophila pseudobadiata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

23.11.2014 14:13, Irina Nikulina:

Basil, all considerations evening will write a temporary time trouble in a hurry and do not want to answer)

23.11.2014 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander the on moths of borneo given 2 types and one of them does not fit categorically.
It Odontodes seranensis: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_5_1.php
And boldsystems three. And the same thing: the only suitable one.
And about the pictures: Well, a little help from Google images :) It's good :)
Man catches in the most wilds on a generator with DRL and nobody knows who else might be pleasant in his training camp :)

23.11.2014 14:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium glycerion / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.11.2014 14:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium glycerion / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.11.2014 14:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium glycerion / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.11.2014 14:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium glycerion / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.11.2014 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio mahadeva / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.11.2014 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio mahadeva / Confidently identified / .

23.11.2014 13:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Kind defined by a single image in mothsofborneo.com. boldsystems.org into three images, and only one image in correspondence mothsofborneo.com. One corresponds to Odontodes seranensis, others do not understand anything. The old bolee20 species. and images of 20 species :( no options, just not found.I do not mean to that used, carried in inaccurate, and besides, that would not make categorical statements on 1-2 online sources. :))

23.11.2014 13:49, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, Yuri, I have a Chinese alebion. Similar to this, but glycerion like much, considering the spread the more likely you are right

23.11.2014 13:49, Irina Nikulina:

More in detail I read about all kinds of 4 and that's what happens: ludifica excluded because of geographical spread, and as already noted, diffusa from neighboring Thailand - size does not exceed 43-44 mm, but among the remaining androdes champa and difficult to define - both species distributed in Peninsular Malaysia,Both about the same size and have the findings of both species in the highlands. By habitus) lies well in champa, in females is a dark underside http://outdoor.geocities.jp/nabenight/4kibarakenmon.htm, but androdes would not completely rule out the possibility of his image in the network are scarce. I would put until inaccurate champa until new data.

23.11.2014 13:44, Alex Dumchus:

Looks like. Lucky fellow

23.11.2014 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here, I porzhaluy agree with Alexander. In my quite complete it too soonDysphania subrepleta, than militaris.
First of all you assume the figure of hind wings: it is different in these species:
D. militaris: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini/dysphaniini_1_2.php
D. subrepleta: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/dysphaniini/dysphaniini_1_4.php
But it could easily be somebody else.

23.11.2014 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thanks for the correction. You really right about the size, I looked it up on the site and the link given incorrect - to another form (. Indeed, based on the size, you can immediately eliminate two of the smallest species: Banisia myrsusalis and Banisia lobata. Who remaining closer to your look?

23.11.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

23.11.2014 12:39, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Yes, on a dark background can be seen better. Still, it seems to me that such instances should be light backgrounds try a less contrasting shades of dark gray, for example. And very overexposed for my taste ...

23.11.2014 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Kind of have to do :)

23.11.2014 11:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, like this Papilio mahadeva Link http://en.butterflycorner.net/Papilio-mahadeva-Burmese-Raven.1151.0.html

23.11.2014 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dysphania militaris: http://www.ccs-hk.org/DM/butterfly/Geometrid/Dysphania-militaris.html in my opinion.

23.11.2014 10:47, Alex Dumchus:

What say Vasily and Alexander Zhakov?

23.11.2014 10:42, Alex Dumchus:

Svetlana. Download.

23.11.2014 0:55, Irina Nikulina:

Maybe - color and geographical spread of the Tax -Trichosea champahttp://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/79_Panteidae/3403%20Trichosea%20champa/Trichosea%20champa.htm ( Malay Peninsula distributing any). Wingspan 50 mm. The description Set close view ludifica, but its spread (except Europe) - Korea and Japan. There is another closely related species diffusa spread in India, Nepal, Thailand and Taiwan.In general, it noted great variability of these species (including Trichosea androdes) - the proportion of dark areas on the NC and black on VC increases to the south.

22.11.2014 23:12, Irina Nikulina:

Basil, you're asking the opinion and decided to find out just want to ask - and for some specific features all 3 Banisia you just carried her to the myrsusalis ? Why, for example, not to the fenestrifera , myrtaea or strigigrapha ? He looked a detailed description of all kinds on the link that you gave in the first comment and izobrazheniya- and compared, and each http://www.pyralidsofborneo.org/index.php?plate-7.There really is a significant indication of the variability of the species, especially on the different variations of the cluster of white / yellowish spots on the PC (up to their complete absence). But the size of the butterfly is given to myrsusalis - 20mm , and only similar to them lobata - a small (18-22mm). While for strigigrapha - 24-29, fenestrifera - 27 and myrtaea - 30.With regard to the last sentence of your commentary «it is found in Mauritius and Reunion. Its wingspan is around 35 mm », in Wikipedia it is given to the form Banisia clathrula http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banisia_clathrula
Other "many places" I did not find it. Tell me, please, where did you get such a size for myrsusalis - 35 mm ?

22.11.2014 22:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Papilio clytia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin Not identified.

22.11.2014 22:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Papilio clytia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin Not identified.

22.11.2014 20:17, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Basil, found the answers to all your doubts!

22.11.2014 19:59, Basil Sergienko:

http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/persons/vasilenko/54.pdf

22.11.2014 19:29, Irina Nikulina:

It turns out that the first image of a new kind of network?) And I really would like to suggest that this Earophila correlata, read somewhere that it occurs not only in Japan (http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentiinae/Earophila_correlata .html), but also in the south of Primorye, but did not write embarrassed sharper triangular cut-outs on the dark bands. By the way, here on the website, pseudobadiata not (which is understandable, it still in Sinev not), but in other correlata worth.kind - Anticlea correlata Warren, 1901

22.11.2014 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No question: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=588678 (here, the truth is posemeystvo in Eutelidae)
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/stictopterinae/stictopterinae_5_2.php
And no options.

22.11.2014 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That photo, without a preview, where I wrote that it is not Macroglossum stellatarum and did not no hawk moth magically vanished and instead there was this. There caterpillar of the genus Corydalis Cerura was on the sheet, and here at the beginning. Strange things are happening. Just some mystic))) Do not believe your eyes: called. We must wipe from the top of the line everything is now.

22.11.2014 14:24, Basil Sergienko:

Earophila pseudobadiata, Vasilenko description in 2007. I think so.

22.11.2014 12:48, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. Also compare the shape of the wings and clytia sastor and look at the underside. Taurus clytia isprescheno numerous white dots, which have no castor

22.11.2014 12:46, Alex Dumchus:

Svetlana. I take a picture of today and tomorrow

22.11.2014 12:37, Svetlana Shchavelina:

And you can count on a different background to do what? And to reduce the brightness? And contrast with something ... I have to monitor some places generally indistinguishable ..............

22.11.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female Trichosea sp. (Noctuidae → Pantheinae). At first thought toTrichosea androdes: endemic of Sumatra and Peninsular Malaysia, and the like as a single species driven from the peninsula (even kind of did). And today withdrew raspravilki and think not like (I suggest "torment" for her species.
Can izmenchivomt? I ran out of ideas (

22.11.2014 12:12, Yuri Semejkin:

P.s. Fumbled on an Internet, they write that Graphium alebion takes place in China, and no word on Vietnam (at least not found).
A Graphium glycerion takes place, at least in North Vietnam.

22.11.2014 11:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, sort of more like a Graphium glycerion? Here is a link http://en.butterflycorner.net/Graphium-glycerion-Spectacle-Swordtail.1278.0.html

22.11.2014 9:10, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitry, ponichalu I myself thought it clytia, kind of variability, but it always has a yellow eye on the bottom and on the top of the upper dash light. Watch пожалуйста,http://www.samuibutterflies.com/insects/butterflies/papilionidae/papiliomahadevaselangoranus/

21.11.2014 21:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia valeria / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Pareronia valeria / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Cirrochroa tyche / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 21:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Cirrochroa tyche / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 21:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Dryas iulia / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

21.11.2014 21:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Tirumala limniace / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Tirumala limniace / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Tirumala limniace / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Tirumala limniace / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Male / Svetlana Shchavelina.

21.11.2014 21:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Male / Svetlana Shchavelina.

21.11.2014 21:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Euploea klugii / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov Not identified.

21.11.2014 21:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euploea klugii / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euploea klugii / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea klugii erichsonii

21.11.2014 21:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio clytia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio clytia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.11.2014 21:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Catopsilia pomona / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 21:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Catopsilia pomona / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 21:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea sylvester / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 21:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea sylvester / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 21:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea sylvester harrisii

21.11.2014 21:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What size?

21.11.2014 20:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.11.2014 20:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio (chilasa) clytia

21.11.2014 20:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio (chilasa) clytia

21.11.2014 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've seen, so it is necessary to remove all of its gallery, along with himself. Who knows what else "alienated." Away from sin ((
P.S. Well, can not Eumorpha way to fly in Vietnam: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35335
Yes, and on e-bay, as far as I know, the stuff of this quality is usually labeled raspravki sale :)
I do not speak about the "image of nature" (Internet) .....

21.11.2014 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, a few photos already shown from other sites.

21.11.2014 12:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If possible, it is necessary to see EXIF ​​for the camera brand. If one camera: his gun. And if from different ..... And in general it is necessary to remove the already over what other people Bayan, from the network.

21.11.2014 12:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 12:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia lemonias / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 12:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia lemonias / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 12:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia iphita / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 12:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia iphita / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.11.2014 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dryas iulia / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

21.11.2014 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.11.2014 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.11.2014 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

21.11.2014 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.11.2014 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.11.2014 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.11.2014 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

21.11.2014 12:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Specifically, the image from Ebay? or bought a butterfly and self-made picture?

21.11.2014 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, all photos by Andrey Kravtsov (Andrey Kravtsov) made in different "styles", I would not wait for the response of the author, and everything would have turned into vague Posted in General or brought to the plane of the visible. not beautiful, if in search engine will take to the authors :))

21.11.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

purpuraria

21.11.2014 9:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euchoeca nebulata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.11.2014 9:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euphyia biangulata / Tentatively identified / Igor Sakhno Euphyia unangulata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

21.11.2014 9:41, Basil Sergienko:

unangulata

21.11.2014 9:17, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Yes

21.11.2014 9:15, Fyodor Pudovikov:

and I for purpuraria)

21.11.2014 8:11, Shamil Murtazin:

forLythria cruentaria=)

20.11.2014 19:24, Peter Khramov:

What re zapihivanie in LC? Written by the same right now, there is no normal version with display of information on Inglish for Russian ph. I have done as part of a joint version, which discussed yesterday.

20.11.2014 18:42, Alex Dumchus:

I then throw them at the weekend, may determine.

20.11.2014 18:22, Alex Dumchus:

Good!

20.11.2014 18:14, Alex Dumchus:

Lebadea martha?

20.11.2014 18:03, Alex Dumchus:

Cirrochroa tyche?, Those caught in Samui, but there are from Malaysia

20.11.2014 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, I too, just look at the pictures and compare. All species are differences in this genus, only need to know the species-specific differences. I'll see that and can naroyu. :)

20.11.2014 17:25, Alex Dumchus:

And what are the essential differences between them. I have two of Chiang Mai - I can not identify

20.11.2014 17:21, Alex Dumchus:

I have the same from French Guiana

20.11.2014 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Me, plagued by vague doubts that this Dysphania subrepleta

20.11.2014 15:55, Andrey Kravtsov:

with Ebay, vestimo

20.11.2014 15:52, Andrey Kravtsov:

Purchased on Ebay at the Vietnamese, it is unlikely he sezdit him to America.

20.11.2014 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides helena / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.11.2014 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides helena / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.11.2014 14:17, Irina Nikulina:

Euchoeca nebulata?

20.11.2014 14:15, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

20.11.2014 14:14, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea sylvester?

20.11.2014 14:12, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea khulgii?

20.11.2014 14:10, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea core ???

20.11.2014 14:03, Alex Dumchus:

Junonia iphita

20.11.2014 14:02, Alex Dumchus:

Ideopsis similis ?

20.11.2014 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides helena / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.11.2014 14:00, Alex Dumchus:

Catopsilia pomona ?

20.11.2014 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides helena / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.11.2014 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia almana / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia almana / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 13:55, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio castor ?

20.11.2014 13:53, Alex Dumchus:

Troides helena

20.11.2014 13:53, Alex Dumchus:

Troides helena

20.11.2014 13:51, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

20.11.2014 13:49, Alex Dumchus:

Hypolimnas bolina, female

20.11.2014 13:49, Alex Dumchus:

She is, in fact come from ts.i th. America, but these caught on Samui

20.11.2014 13:46, Alex Dumchus:

Junonia lemonias

20.11.2014 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, Yuri, this picture is deleted as it is impossible. We look forward to further development in the study of this kind.

20.11.2014 12:20, Yuri Semejkin:

No, Alexander, though, and returned to it several times, but opinion has not changed. . Yes, it really looks like Celastrina ladonides, but only .. seems shabby and not particularly. Want -perenosite in inaccurate, and it is better to remove.

20.11.2014 11:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree, the intrigue will remain :) smotet further. And that already saw the site where the pages of this genus, 2 species, and more are under one. :))

20.11.2014 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus genutia / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 11:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus genutia / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 10:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus genutia / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 10:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus genutia / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

20.11.2014 0:11, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Danaus genutia

20.11.2014 0:10, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Danaus genutia

20.11.2014 0:06, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Appias olferna
male?

20.11.2014 0:01, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Papilio demoleus malayanus (other subspecies of my "magic book" for Thailand is not specified)

19.11.2014 23:56, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hebomoia glaucippe

19.11.2014 23:55, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hebomoia glaucippe

19.11.2014 23:19, Svetlana Shchavelina:

See also: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27470
Who just is not in the "photos from the same individual"

19.11.2014 23:08, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Chersonesia rahria ?

19.11.2014 22:58, Irina Nikulina:

On mothsofborneo such an image that no wrinkles at all albimarginata have not seen), and boldsystems - only one examined, and 2 copies. in this area too zatёrtye. Reacted to the variation .. Yes, Sasha, perhaps trying to pull the ears albimarginata), but only because a delicator still can not bind me.Pieces 5 live considered summer (sat quietly under the light), and all the width of the white band was approximately equal to the distance between the two veins, more-less, its boundary as if a diagonal divides a rectangle between the two veins of the 15 authentic images online (8 of them on jpmoth) also single with a large white area.And yet - examined on beige living area from the anal angle NC - she'd always step, in general, classic delicat (i) or - if you compare with what he saw in nature - that such http://hattoritaka.web.fc2.com/ ga / kuromonaoshaku.html http://d.hatena.ne.jp/yyzz2/20070813/p1 and in no way convinces Sasha, just thinking, then let stand up yet)

19.11.2014 22:57, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Junonia almana ?

19.11.2014 22:48, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Dryas iulia ?

19.11.2014 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania malayanus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.11.2014 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania malayanus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.11.2014 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander finished writing I do not know whether there is, in her official name :) But I can not put a time came in lux.

19.11.2014 21:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil is very similar, just like to add that this is a form of it you have to do with your page. We put in inaccurate, well, suddenly, clearly not typical Dysphania malayanus, then another kind of describe. :))

19.11.2014 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dysphania malayanus Bracca maculosa.

19.11.2014 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dysphania malayanus Bracca maculosa.

19.11.2014 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Included with the male Borneo.
For the second time already I refute this statement: "Habitat preference. The species is very rare in Borneo. The only specimen seen was from Pulo Laut". From: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part- 6 / aganainae / aganainae-2-1.php))))

19.11.2014 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have a fairly strong suspicion that it is precisely the form of zheltokrylayaDysphania malayanus
But like I have met only one place: http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=68804
So I put in limbo. It requires the final verdict :)

19.11.2014 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to move from here toBracca maculosa, it was she, and not Dysphania:
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Boarmiini/boarmiini_2_2.php
That's my boo-boo, and I apologize for it wildly (

19.11.2014 18:07, Andrey Kravtsov: This species is identified correctly.

19.11.2014 18:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, the opinion has not changed? :)

19.11.2014 16:44, Peter Khramov:

Well appointed for 8pm.

19.11.2014 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, with 20 and call each other :) I'm home now and I can at any time.

19.11.2014 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, trifenestrata drop can be: totally inappropriate: I have five males it is and as one other. True to the series of the peninsula. Riddle another. Let Powys is. Perhaps later overshadow finally :)

19.11.2014 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Certainly, there are the characteristic features of each type, but alas, we know their district, I at least. which should look, what would distinguish these species. It is unlikely that he genital. The size, the timing of summer, there are areas of difference, but in Europe we all know that, and for Asia is not, Basil already spoken about this. :)

19.11.2014 15:44, Peter Khramov:

Cook, eat and forget it as a nightmare.

19.11.2014 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

In 19 to Moscow. if successful set of circumstances, and with 20

19.11.2014 15:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Given the variability of it to three kinds (Cricula elaezia, Cricula trifenestrata, Cricula bornea) of the three suits, well, too, to the new More species from this genus was not looking, and dozens of them. :)

19.11.2014 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, at the earliest as you can?

19.11.2014 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

On Comibaena albimarginata not like more than Comibaena delicator. Look at the basal white sash: at albimarginata - sharp hall at the top, had a broken delicator it, but without sharp creases, and here, almost like a compass. :)

19.11.2014 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Today there is no such interference, specifically the time?

19.11.2014 13:28, Peter Khramov:

Since yesterday skonnektili, I can still tonight. If we do not succeed - then pass until Monday.

19.11.2014 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not one of the three types of Cricula, Cator is on moths of borneo did not seem to fit.
Is described in 2010. Cricula elaezioborneensis Brechlin, 2010 :
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=294281 (first photo link) ???
Or justCricula elaezia:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=476096
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/saturniidae/saturniidae_5_3.php?
I want to hear the views on this subject :)

18.11.2014 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eumorpha phorbas view of the American and Vietnam like it should not be:
http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/ephorbas.htm
Unless, of course not migrate?

18.11.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I decided to put a different look. And then allCreatonotos transiensput :)

18.11.2014 17:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cleora determinata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

18.11.2014 17:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cleora determinata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

18.11.2014 17:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Oenospila altistrix / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

18.11.2014 17:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Oenospila altistrix / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

18.11.2014 17:30, Peter Khramov:

Ok, Basil says he, too, will be able to. Let us then from 9 to 11 pm in Moscow where the thread. At the same time more taxa to discuss the expansion of insects (it seems you still need to combine and EN RU version of the site, and if it is taken over, it is there to Insectoids not so far).

18.11.2014 17:20, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, a year ago you suggested inaccurate in supply, and not rule out that "something can and the third." She's like something from the beginning somehow did not go in delicator, embarrassed color spots on the upper wings and the size of the white area; I've seen enough delicator live, especially this summer. Bottom VC is another angle, from delicator brown area and larger and brighter (redder).And today, in connection with new productions again reviewed all the possible options, and I think that just may beComibaena albimarginataIt is very similar to subdelicata, I initially assumed, but spread more. What do you think?

18.11.2014 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

CONCLUSIONS

18.11.2014 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Conclusions.

18.11.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On mothsofborneo several. It looked to me most of all :)

18.11.2014 16:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

All species of this genus, as the pitch of the upper wing, the lower slightly different, not something specific: yes or no I can not say.

18.11.2014 16:31, Peter Khramov:

Well so what, we deduce from the form or leave?

18.11.2014 16:30, Peter Khramov:

So what to do?

18.11.2014 16:29, Peter Khramov:

Nope opinion.

18.11.2014 16:27, Peter Khramov:

Why can not tolerate that? ..

18.11.2014 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Jan, this shot is taken at Russian Far East. The species' looks are different there.

18.11.2014 16:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew agrees with the redefinition.?

18.11.2014 16:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yesterday evening the house was not too difficult today, neither of which I can not promise, but I'll try :))

18.11.2014 16:13, Peter Khramov:

I can tonight on Skype. How are you?

18.11.2014 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, if I'm not sure that male or female, you can not stand. :))

18.11.2014 16:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.11.2014 16:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

like here I put that buck ???

18.11.2014 16:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

for at least another 4 from the region, but I have not looked in detail the spread, but the area they certainly are not as big.

18.11.2014 16:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

It looks like that does not immediately found. But calm would leave is now.

18.11.2014 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then let it be a female, although I like that about sitting on the road never seen :)
Beguiled even what I looked too small for the female white spots and bands on the front wings. Probably because of the angle so.
I apologize for such a categorical statement yesterday.

18.11.2014 15:35, Fyodor Pudovikov:

The female, the male white band on the hind wings is much narrower.

18.11.2014 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only it is not displayed when switching to the English version and LC, there the stuffed crooked. Apparently, again because data ZHPS. But after zapihivaniya from England in the version of the re-start display correctly: checked. It is necessary to correct the matter, if the opportunity is.

18.11.2014 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The exact place it did not, although there are practically no doubts:
http://boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=352567
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_26_1.php
It has, of course, something in common withComibaena delicator:
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Geometrinae/Comibaena_delicatior.html
But in spite of everything, this is not it.
Please comment on this.

18.11.2014 13:59, Peter Khramov:

No, not translated. I used to have a centralized translation, now there is. And windows users to embed data in English either. And experiments with British geography of nowhere. Program site deep in parallel, in what language you write it zapihnet everything in the fields, which are set up.

18.11.2014 12:02, Basil Sergienko:

It is likely mucronata. Hausmann (GME 3) general luridata leads only to the south of Russia and the southern Urals, possibly due to lack of data

18.11.2014 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, the problem is not with the data in the translation. I now there is a Russian geography and she, too, can only in the Russian version. Already he drove in Anloyazychnuyu version later. Nekuzyavo (
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35323 I uploaded yesterday with the English geography. Compare what it looks like in both versions.

18.11.2014 9:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! And after all these photographs in any way for the English version are not translated? Location shooting, author comment, etc.?

18.11.2014 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter started to get a little picture of the expanded material Boldyrev. When all have to get you to phone. All material from Thailand, uncertainties and seems to be one Rhopalocera.

18.11.2014 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not argue, Alexander. Just when determining the material from a particular region, rely more on regional sources. This is closer geographically. And there I did not find more similar.

17.11.2014 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

17.11.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male Alexander 100% (apparently forgot to put down) :)

17.11.2014 20:14, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

17.11.2014 20:03, Irina Nikulina:

Maybe it's not Targalla sp, and Risoba sp? MaleRisoba walshae? http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=368966
Differences 3 similar species walshae, repugnans samarinda and well marked in the Diagnosis http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-18/risobinae/risobinae_1_1.php and the following two kinds.

17.11.2014 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis populi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.11.2014 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.11.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You're welcome, Vladimir. This Moscow / Moscow region, and no options here :)

17.11.2014 19:50, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.

17.11.2014 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Limenitis populimale (red holes are clearly visible on the rear fenders).
Add: the other, our speciesLimenitis camillathese wells are not expressed so clearly.
A male, because females lentochnikov perelivnits and we never go down on the road and kept almost always about CZK (in foliage) deorevev and shrubs.

17.11.2014 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis paphiamale

17.11.2014 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Define the following link:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/45_THYRIDOIDEA/Thyrididae/61.1_Striglininae/70_Monodecus/Monodecus%20capillatus/Monodecus%20capillatus.htm
I put in yet inaccurate and need more opinions. While virtually assured of correctness.
Until recently it was considered a subspecies of butterfly species Monodecus admirandus: http://eol.org/pages/30672608/overview (outdated information) and was then withdrawn as a separate species. Information about this can be found here: http://pyralidsofborneo.org/index.php?monodecus-capillatus-whalley-1976plate-8rts-4081

17.11.2014 16:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

This genus has six similar species (catalog Witt vol.4), but I would probably also determined the way, but inaccurate.

17.11.2014 15:38, Vladimir Deryabin:



07.11.2014 17:05 Alexander Zhakov

... In the future, please, put in the definition of the Latin names that have not been dvoechteniya. :)) And then I would have had before:))

Of course before, no doubt - because in Latin, I would have written before the Second Coming.
Thank you.

17.11.2014 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Stan Korb.

17.11.2014 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first available resource:: "the sapodilla borer (banisia myrsusalis) is a species of moth of the thyrididae family. ... Family. It is found in mauritius and réunion its wingspan is around 35 mm" : http://www.wordaz.com/banisia.html
And in many places as well.

17.11.2014 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is for our may be omitted, and for these, it is desirable that a rule does not take .. compete and have scope for both copies. He, by the way almost the same :) And like also corresponds. If you type Banisia myrsusalis wingspan, it finds that Rahma is about 35 mm.

17.11.2014 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So odnovpemenno do you approx. Just when I did it I looked and it was not, and when the button pressed already written that kind of canceled since there :) coincided, I think. Rarely, but sometimes that :)

17.11.2014 12:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.11.2014 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha flavipalpana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.11.2014 12:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Is very similar. :) Vasily, it would be nice if just specify the size, time lines do not allow :))

17.11.2014 12:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the type was not transferred reaziruet no errors in the author's name.

17.11.2014 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Postponed, the view was, but with a typo in the description of the author's last name. Stas, correct the date of the passing-:)

17.11.2014 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia artaxerxes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.11.2014 10:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Stanislav, you must specify 2012 or 2011.

17.11.2014 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Female / Andrei Komrakov.

17.11.2014 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, I wrote that followed the grounds specified Yuri .... Now I do not remember what prompted am not at home (from the bodies. I write). I will try to justify later if happens. However, after reading your post already I think I could be wrong. Recheck necessary.

17.11.2014 3:35, Irina Nikulina:

This image has been transferred in the summer when long time without visiting the site, and now I try to understand. The link Basil looked, according to what principle transferred photos and did not understand (. Yuri Karpov: «Apatura ilia, on the underside of the front wing bright black spot, which does not have Apatura metis» The absence of a spot at the half-breed in question? In some subspecies of metis, e.g., A. m.irtyshika, really black eye on your PC is less than (but not absent), but in the south of Primorye Territory subspecies (often stands out even as a separate species) A. metis substituta Butler, 1873. Please see the images of this subspecies have V.V.Dubatolova http: //szmn.eco.nsc.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Nymphalidae/Apatura_metis_substituta.htm http://pisum.bionet.nsc.ru/kosterin/nymphal/metis.htm (in nature) and is http: // www.pteron-world.com/topics/classfication/nymphalidae/apaturinae/apaturinae1.html Black spot is always present, and it is quite large.It happens the same in size as that of subspecies of Apatura ilia ussuriensis. But please pay attention to such otlichiya- have ilia is mottled black spot - in a distinct yellow-brown rim, as here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29574 (especially for comparison gave a reference to Elijah from the same place). And metis substituta black spot - a blurred oval ocher-yellow background.The second feature is very characteristic metis- noticeable outward protrusion in the middle of the middle light bands on the LC, the outer limit of the sling clear. Again, you can compare with the photo # 29574 (or any other page.) - There is no projection of Elijah, and the outer boundary of a blurred.Another feature - 4 black dots (spots) on the underside at the root of the VC at the metis substituta located on red-yellow background, while at the ilia often the background light (photo # 29574) I understand that the variability of species of large, Elijah lot local forms, and these types of fly almost simultaneously and often in some habitats, it is also an AI Kurentsov noted.I assume that the transfer to the faithful Elijah, but I would like to be confident of the correctness of the definition. Therefore, I ask to help deal with this photo. Or at least explain about the bright black spot, which served as the basis for the transfer of two photos.

17.11.2014 3:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Endemic Vanessa :-) In contrast, Admiral and Painted Lady .... And where firewood?

17.11.2014 1:16, Peter Khramov:

Endemic to Hawaii - to describe the kind of information.

17.11.2014 1:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus pseudaegon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 23:51, Irina Nikulina:

Then, too, and it would move the photo - it is in the group)

16.11.2014 22:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus pseudaegon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 22:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus subsolanus / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.

16.11.2014 21:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Alexandr Zhakov.

16.11.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thyrididae there I think, if I remember correctly. Actually they are interested in right now.

16.11.2014 21:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Erynnis montanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 21:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrium herzi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 21:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis ilos / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 21:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis ilos / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 21:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis andetria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 21:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.11.2014 21:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Delias hyparete / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

16.11.2014 21:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Delias hyparete / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

16.11.2014 21:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

moths of borneo no ognevok. no.

16.11.2014 21:28, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 21:28, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

INFA is well served and the main thing is not copied to the moths of borneo. Thanks to him last 2 types Thyrididae determined with a high degree of fidelity.

16.11.2014 19:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Another would be for there the krambidam find something

16.11.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.11.2014 18:22, Stan Korb:

pseudaegon

16.11.2014 18:21, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 18:20, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 18:19, Stan Korb:

Plebeius subsolanus

16.11.2014 18:17, Stan Korb:

I want to see a copy. It is not maturna. It intermedia

16.11.2014 18:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

None of this kind in Israel

16.11.2014 18:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Callophrys avis / Confidently identified / Stan Korb Not identified.

16.11.2014 18:15, Stan Korb:

Aricia artaxerxes, without a doubt. The shape of the wings spicy, front wings with darker edged boundary.

16.11.2014 18:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus idas / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.11.2014 18:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I am sure ???

16.11.2014 18:11, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 18:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Callophrys avis / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.

16.11.2014 18:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes ochracea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 18:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2014 18:09, Stan Korb:

Callophrys avis

16.11.2014 18:06, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 18:03, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 17:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

07/20/2021 nifiga a "guest from buduyuschego"

16.11.2014 17:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Two identical photos with 35301

16.11.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is in the admin. It is necessary that someone from modders looked back and understood. On the phone I can not do it.

16.11.2014 16:40, Stan Korb:

Add a butterfly in the database)))

16.11.2014 16:40, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 16:39, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2014 15:05, Yuri Semejkin:

The definition should be put Zhakova, I just added a file to the individuals that they picked 31384: Acleris aurichalcana

16.11.2014 14:22, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha flavipalpana

16.11.2014 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill in any case. Do butterflies before raspravkoy, the tips of the front wings are folded up, almost at right angles. I believe in nature as well. No one else has seen such.

16.11.2014 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Although I get better. There is and genitals and photo (prada such quality, as though all the stuff out there for a long time in the washing maschine rinsed): http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-8/auzeinae/gallery.php
By spreading there justDecetia subflavataseems appropriate: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-8/auzeinae/auzeinae_1_3.php that not a fact ......

16.11.2014 4:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I want to say thank you for bringing to the subfamily.
Now Googling and matured quite a disappointing verdict.
Riddle dead on the go and have it in uncertain times (
In all three types of the subfamily Auzea, Decetia and Brachydecetia and almost no network or images themselves butterflies or drugs genitals.
And before I respected boldsystems. org race Auzea general in Geometridae; Ennominae is: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php / Taxbrowser_Taxonpage? taxid = 323577 I had done blindly trust this resource: numerous facts speak for themselves (.
Maybe it's true and that's to remove the photos? More like riddles provide: for this Gela snaps.
By the way: the proposal made in a previous post remains in force :)

16.11.2014 2:52, Jan Rasmussen:

Forgot to choose: Deilephila elpenor *

16.11.2014 2:23, Jan Rasmussen:

Does not look like the H. petasites I know from Denmark at all... *

16.11.2014 0:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Oressinoma typhla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

16.11.2014 0:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Portrait :) The idea can be removed if found true. Androkonii surezno and more than remarkable. Maybe it will tip some? It seems that somewhere saw like, but I can not remember (

15.11.2014 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Opinions?

15.11.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Opinions?

15.11.2014 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitri, in the medicine cabinet led: http://pyralidsofborneo.org/
He looked me right away.
Not a bad site, although small, but infa there on the shelves laid out :)
Alexander, on Monday, and the house will appear, and then let's talk :)

15.11.2014 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And more will come later Cyana sp. several.....

15.11.2014 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suggestions? Someone from Erebidae?

15.11.2014 23:30, Irina Nikulina:

Good flyNeptis andetria. From DV neptisov living in 40 reg., Only her white bar in the central cell PC is divided into 3 to 4 spots

15.11.2014 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gifts. Only the cook and the verdict. Details in the mail :)

15.11.2014 22:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura schrenckii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.11.2014 22:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.11.2014 22:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.11.2014 21:17, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes ochracea

15.11.2014 21:17, Irina Nikulina:

Glaucopsyche lycormas

15.11.2014 21:17, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis ilos

15.11.2014 21:16, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura schrenckii

15.11.2014 21:16, Irina Nikulina:

Erynnis montanus

15.11.2014 21:15, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackii

15.11.2014 21:15, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis ilos

15.11.2014 21:14, Irina Nikulina:

Satyrium herzi

15.11.2014 21:14, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio xuthus

15.11.2014 20:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

When the size of Basil wrote - it became clear that it Auzeinae. But I did not see them live (((

15.11.2014 20:29, Irina Nikulina:

Well, and the page is not updated, while writing and copying Latin) Sorry, Dmitry already written.

15.11.2014 20:28, Irina Nikulina:

And you can tell fortunes?) I wanted to write here that someone from Auzeinae, can be born Brachydecetia? (or Decetia?) abstained write, abandoned professionals)

15.11.2014 20:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Decetia?

15.11.2014 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is not Geometridae and Noctuidae, I kind of know the doge, in the net image is almost no need to cook. :))

15.11.2014 19:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Three signs are confused:
1. pink lower wings
2. Both middle of the red framed black sling,
3. Radical red sash reaches almost to the bottom edge, at perornata only to the middle.
individually can be ignored, but all together confirms the decision of Basil.

15.11.2014 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Proplyetkin Irina Nikulina.

15.11.2014 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis thisbe / Andrey Proplyetkin Neptis ilos / Irina Nikulina.

15.11.2014 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis thisbe Neptis ilos.

15.11.2014 19:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.11.2014 19:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm kind of at home today, so if the three of us get together, it's talk, I can move away from the monitor, so it's best to specify the time. :)

15.11.2014 18:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus thersites / Pavel Ivanov Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.11.2014 18:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And what's the source of Pyralidae and Thyrididae Borneo ????

15.11.2014 18:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clearly, Dim. Tube ....

15.11.2014 18:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I pass

15.11.2014 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aglais ioPvavliny eyes. Vladimir, well that you really? This is the same in Europe the most famous butterfly :)

15.11.2014 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very original cloth: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Рогоз
Straight comes to mind is that the "upside down" hung up :)
I Fill: I have all the swamp near the house closer to the fall in such "rags" :)

15.11.2014 17:30, Shamil Murtazin:

The author says that the train is a rag soaked with wine and sugar ...

15.11.2014 17:28, Shamil Murtazin:

You said that the place is not enough to scatter hints - that's proposal. It can help.
At different resolutions - different width of the window of the store. I'm all for it.

15.11.2014 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Decayed?

15.11.2014 16:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He suggests that one female wormed somewhere and Pheromones "On the whole Ivanovo" :)
By the way, I can not understand it, whether "earring" the tree such that-if "bump" Rogoza (continuing his "reeds" called, erroneously) is suspended?

15.11.2014 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is the second copy. type, which is assembled by the same person at the same place and at the same time.
http://pyralidsofborneo.org/index.php?banisia-myrsusalis-walker-1859eplate-7rts-404
Variability, however :)

15.11.2014 15:53, Alexander Belousov:

Hike some "men" flew!

15.11.2014 15:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes it is clear, just not in the mood right now (. A new species of me completely. And the time will soon be a lot ....
Today, only 2 kind of started the for specific species and a good source of Pyralidae and Thyrididae Borneo :)

15.11.2014 14:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Araschnia levana f. prorsa

15.11.2014 14:56, Peter Khramov:

For stores, they invented at the best adaptation for smart phones and stuff like that. But that was a significant difference between 720p and 1080p in the design boutiques - a terrible rarity. Sales and offhand I do not cite examples (if there are examples - reset).
Pro tips - not stuck. Where are they missing? .. And the drop-down list, too - where? ..

15.11.2014 14:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomaspilis marginata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.11.2014 14:46, Peter Khramov:

Basil, except malice, bear in mind that simply hands do not always reach, ugums. Ie Type just went and looked, move early, then not too early, but the outside is not always written and so on. But all references are in a separate list we Irina, so everything will be postponed, even if not immediately.

15.11.2014 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here's a Catocalinae proved. At first glance, all of the bear adopted.
She torments her and the family had to do with a view:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=394525
P.S. The hands would tear him who caught for the disgusting quality material (

15.11.2014 12:03, Irina Nikulina:

Lomaspilis marginata

15.11.2014 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lomaspilis. marginata or opis (confused them).

15.11.2014 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rivula sericealis

15.11.2014 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first representative of the kind of site :)
Put until inaccurate (highly variable): confirmation or refutation.
The Australian version: http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/thyr/myrsusalis.html
Kind of interesting that distributed in all zoogeographical regions except Palearctic.

15.11.2014 9:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pyralidae + Thyrididae Borneo: http://pyralidsofborneo.org useful site, add the sources.
Dmitri, for you can be true :)

15.11.2014 8:52, Stan Korb:

Parnassius should be divided into Parnassius, Driopa, Sachaia, Koramius, Tadumia, Kreizbergius.

15.11.2014 8:49, Stan Korb:

smaragdinus is the type species Chrysozephyrus, it should only be there.

15.11.2014 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That is now a miracle mohnatokryloe :)
I can not understand it, unfortunately (
Maybe someone knows?

15.11.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cyana perornata ?

15.11.2014 3:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here they just can not be put into precise. Can you confirm or deny.
Like the Japanese have found one such rozovokrylogo male:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/21_Cyana/Cyana%20perornata/Cyana%20perornata.htm
But still I did not dare.

15.11.2014 2:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In fact wondering why not illustrated species that no options. If there is nothing to oppose the means to do it. Not for the first time faced with this Malay lishaynitsey: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/35236 (and Fraser have it, but more killed, so do not spread). It is necessary to move the business off the ground. If you see the options, then they write.If you do not see, then we illustrate. The question is understandable in my opinion. Just tired already kilometer discussions under each of my butterfly. So here wrote.

15.11.2014 1:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rogoz like. Wine is saturated? Interesting :)

15.11.2014 0:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.11.2014 0:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.11.2014 0:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.11.2014 0:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.11.2014 0:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.11.2014 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias cardena / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

15.11.2014 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias cardena / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.11.2014 23:48, Irina Nikulina:

male

14.11.2014 23:48, Irina Nikulina:

male

14.11.2014 23:47, Irina Nikulina:

male

14.11.2014 23:47, Irina Nikulina:

male

14.11.2014 23:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Magneuptychia libye

14.11.2014 23:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hermeuptychia hermes

14.11.2014 23:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hermeuptychia hermes

14.11.2014 23:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hermeuptychia hermes

14.11.2014 23:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hermeuptychia hermes

14.11.2014 23:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Venezuela's endemic Hermeuptychia atalanta

14.11.2014 22:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oressinoma typhla

14.11.2014 22:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias hyparete

14.11.2014 22:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias hyparete

14.11.2014 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Appias cardena

14.11.2014 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Appias cardena

14.11.2014 22:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Bassarona dunya / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.11.2014 22:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No, it's Dunya! Bassarona dunya (Doubleday, [1848]) male

14.11.2014 22:04, Irina Nikulina:

Hastening red wine :))

14.11.2014 22:01, Alex Dumchus:

It looks like something African or Cymothoe or Euphaedra?

14.11.2014 22:00, Irina Nikulina:

Andrew seems to have forgotten here is to link a group photo with the photo underside http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13895 (these 2 photos put in the gallery Makrokluba and there they stand as a photo of one individual). And on the underside can be clearly seen that itNeptis ilos. Types ilos - thisbe - tshetverikovi well differ on the underside. And at the top ilos it is different from the last two. If necessary, we are ready to discuss this in more detail.

14.11.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, though, would be our Amphipoea sp. In my opinion the best option :) In Amphipoea sp. it is necessary to withdraw all without exception.

14.11.2014 21:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

the rest of the genital act so well? Here is full of them.
All species that have two or more possible answers, and not how it shows the advantage of one of them, are not certain. That's just the problem, it is necessary to know these options, and then Vasily wrong. I would like to see all the official theme: here is full of them :)

14.11.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, there is no option, really. Illustrates.

14.11.2014 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh, do not tell. Half to shoot the goats. Be on my way ....

I go to Meshchora, dig deeper under the bark beetles. Perhaps I calm down and ........

14.11.2014 20:42, Peter Khramov:

In what?

14.11.2014 19:48, Shamil Murtazin:

According to paragraph 3 invented designs "feedback." This script gives the browser the current resolution and, starting from him, preconfigured template is selected. And these templates, for example, three. Under 800x600, 1600x1200 and 1920x1080. Well, hereinafter generally "more-less". At the exit, we have a pseudo-rubber design.Or quantum rubber :)
Pro tips - already wrote about the hint when the mouse - as the tag html acronym.
Plus there are drop-down lists, suggestive comments in the input fields, etc.
Photo collection probably do with links and e-mail.

14.11.2014 19:30, Peter Khramov:

It is strange that until now can be seen on the Nikon better blue, although it would seem, as the post-processing steps, not like before ... But it is all the lyrics.

14.11.2014 19:29, Peter Khramov:

Basil, what nafig, lately?)) Where Pestets roll starting around the year 2003.

14.11.2014 18:42, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Strange that?
In this case, the BB is not right. And, when shooting in RAW (NEF), the white balance is easy to rule in the proyavschike.

14.11.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, sing there. If in our country as professionals will come on, that's what we roll? From there and gloom:
Sorry, guys. Just recently the impression that the country does not need a pro, and you need to trash, which can steer somehow .....

14.11.2014 18:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Vasily. :)

14.11.2014 17:35, Peter Khramov:

I join the call of Demetrius.

14.11.2014 17:29, Peter Khramov:

No you have no cause for discouragement. Next to Alexei. If instead you need to do business, you nazhreshsya in the trash - it is your personal choice.
However, today I can not be on Skype. Yesterday I was at the time allocated.

14.11.2014 17:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Probably another type.

14.11.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No rut of me and never will. Meeting on Skype available today, if not in the trash nazhrus (yesterday called from work and explained that I had to leave before the end of the month). Sadly the soul (((

14.11.2014 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yulodisy (Julodis sp.) Need iron: all :) And it was full of long-horned beetles should be interesting. Definitely we discuss :)

14.11.2014 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Swipe: 4.5 cm. (Estimated range).

14.11.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is interesting to think about. Thank you :) I have, though mostly beetles, and there should be an interesting long-horned beetles and borers. Be sure to discuss :)

14.11.2014 14:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Spreads of all, write checklist, put the series and evaluated. Signs, despite the variability, there is still a general.

14.11.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I like there still is some KLEOR: I am afraid even to spread. And Pingasa sp. several species (also, they are like hard) ...
The thing we must do say, though moth is not entirely mine: just got a lot of them.

14.11.2014 14:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And the size of what?

14.11.2014 14:18, Alex Dumchus:

In females canescens dirtea and lower wings at the bottom with prosinyu.Bolshe I can not say anything, and therefore put a question mark.

14.11.2014 14:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Do not worry! And it came to it. Do checklist for this genus mainland Malaysia. I have their Borneo will bring to mind and see.
Especially moths of this genus very interesting to me

14.11.2014 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For the link I gave, at the bottom there are links to both types: they are more :)

14.11.2014 14:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

2,4,6 main signs of distinction. Peter Alexander's time to increase)))

14.11.2014 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sadly, zeroed, then :)

14.11.2014 14:02, Alex Dumchus:

And now I look, and Graphium epaminondas (http://swallowtails.net/). Well, it is quite unlike these two, much more on androcles. Moreover, he Andaman ostrovov- well, where it is in the collection, I have a collection in Andaman nothing, and you?

14.11.2014 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Too logical. I can not wait when Meschera tear, favorite on buduyuschy season plans for fishing on light there is thorough, with a generator and XRD (Tragosoma depsarium still not catching, and there it must be stopudovo) :) And while the material Tropical understand: too The point, however.

14.11.2014 13:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Female, Lexias, but why pardalis? Why not Lexias canescens, Lexias dirtea?

14.11.2014 13:53, Alex Dumchus:

Lexias pardalis, the female?

14.11.2014 13:50, Alex Dumchus:

By Gr. decolor can answer: I imeetsyatakoy well as in Vas.Otlichiya:
1. The fourth black strip on the upper edge of a wing at dekolor shortened
2. Lower the black strip at the rear framing dekolor wider and reaches the edge of the wing.
3. Near to the calf black strip on the upper wing crosses all
4.In dekolor olee clearly marked stripes on the bottom (where the eyes have papillomas)
5. At the bottom near the tails of the second series of black strips at dekolor more pronounced
6. The second strip of the upper torso at dekolor stretched much further and is not cut off, and tapers to nothing ......
Unfortunately Graphium epaminondas not in the collection, so on it can not say anything.

14.11.2014 13:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think that should be uncertain until it is necessary to move.

14.11.2014 13:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is not in the material. Travel and charges much more interesting than routine raspravki and identification of species.

14.11.2014 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitri, who has the material does not end the season all year round. I have it until spring, and then gradually goes into the next :)

14.11.2014 13:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I feel the site will soon wither. All quarreled because the season is over and do not fuck

14.11.2014 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So where you have to filter all :)

14.11.2014 13:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander! Explain the differences between categories
Graphium antiphates
Graphium decolor
Graphium epaminondas
Geography is unknown to us !!!

14.11.2014 13:36, Peter Khramov:

This initially interesting. And at this point I was quite interesting all this strain.

14.11.2014 13:35, Peter Khramov:

Photoshop Photoshop and Nikon are still associated with cool colors. Strange.

14.11.2014 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Ugums in comments from the author and is given ...

14.11.2014 13:33, Peter Khramov:

Remind: to meet and discuss on Skype so without rutting on who, where, who and in what form corrected. All of this algorithm: 10/11/2014 22:37.

14.11.2014 13:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In vain! With the blizzard interesting.

14.11.2014 13:32, Alex Dumchus:

In my collection of one to one.

14.11.2014 13:31, Peter Khramov:

Clean snowstorm. I propose to continue to do without it.

14.11.2014 13:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio rumanzovia / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

14.11.2014 13:28, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio rumanzovia

14.11.2014 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it is necessary to drive the date and the geography here: http://www.leps.it/
There's the lowest kind of picture in the gallery. I do not know, just like with this site provides links to species.

14.11.2014 12:42, Jan Rasmussen: This species is identified correctly.

14.11.2014 12:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-14/plusiinae/plusiinae_4_1.php
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/10Plusiinae/4156%20Thysanoplusia%20orichalcea/Thysanoplusia%20orichalcea.htm

14.11.2014 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/04_Lithosiinae/10_Tigrioides/Tigrioides%20puncticollis/Tigrioides%20puncticollis.htm
I do not see the options. They are not here.

14.11.2014 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

In flight Autographa gamma :))

14.11.2014 10:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.11.2014 9:47, Vladimir Bryukhov:

AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED

14.11.2014 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I brought the link :)

14.11.2014 9:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

On what grounds was determined ???

14.11.2014 9:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! Learn to cook. All the same it is necessary. And the most interesting fact get to the bottom. Will upload photos drugs. So boil !!! A copy of this does not spoil! The drug in microtubes pin up the pin. So even "scientific" looks

14.11.2014 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, and the others can do the genital same? Here is full of them.

14.11.2014 9:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Also, only a certain race.

14.11.2014 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

It seems that the truth. Nothing similar is not the network.

14.11.2014 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Behind him, followed by: Xixuthrus heros Heer in Gräffe, 1868 https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xixuthrus_heros
Just have not found it (
What about the coins I do not know. I'll ask at the event.

14.11.2014 9:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

In uncertain. Only race.

14.11.2014 9:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

He shoves hell knows where pine for brazhnikom.Nebos for Xixuthrus huckster gone !!! There are coin / bill Fijian remained unnecessary?

14.11.2014 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, I did not get. Yes, they're not caught like especially.
True sones BrazhnikSphinx pinastricaught. And in Fiji, he is flying in full :)
It can be spread in the archipelago of Fiji safely add :)

14.11.2014 8:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apparently then Omiza sp. AlternativelyOmiza lycorariadoes not fit?
Like all four types and it varies.

14.11.2014 8:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Fiji received the material?

14.11.2014 8:32, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you, Mr looked. Miokensis, perhaps -ultramarinovy ​​and caelestis - like. Only here urvillianus bred on farms and sell frequently, and these subtypes are not found

14.11.2014 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not know how and I do not know whom to give. If you were close, then you would be presented to brew :)

14.11.2014 8:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.11.2014 8:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Agathia gigantea, there seems no options.

14.11.2014 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Something of Hypochrosini

14.11.2014 8:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

miokensis
caelestis

14.11.2014 8:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I offer to cook!

14.11.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's really bad case in my opinion.
The timid suggestion: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Baptini/baptini_14_4.php and not the fact that she is.

14.11.2014 6:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I offer up the best times to move in inaccurate and it is put on the spot.

14.11.2014 6:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I can not understand who did. There is speculation that the determinable without genitals with a very characteristic appearance.

14.11.2014 6:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Options considered and inaccurate to suggest to leave it where it is, right from the start. Geography with mothsofborneo must believe very carefully. Here copies. approx. from the same as my: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=352568

14.11.2014 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do see a lot of
Including the fact that it has three days from the date of loading, with obviously the best definition.
I see no reason to load new types until you have illustrated earlier supplies, including inaccurate.

14.11.2014 2:51, Peter Khramov:

Remove excess from the last commentary. View illustrated. Basil, the site is no day-night party-goers to carry species as soon as immediately. Have you ever seen that took place less than a day since the confirmation Dmitry? ..

14.11.2014 2:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is time.

14.11.2014 2:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No options. Please pay attention.

14.11.2014 1:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I slept, corny, sorry.

14.11.2014 1:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not illustrated look. Although it is defined and no options (((

14.11.2014 0:59, Peter Khramov:

1. You're right. And it is now even more than before. There is a small laid by it, it can be raised, but have radically, you see, will not change.
2a. In most cases, like as black. Examples Throw ...
2b. Examples where it interferes Throw too. Interesting.
2c. Ugums, it is already in the list of fixes.
(in small letters) also ugums.
3.There's no escape and no escape. Rubber sites (not in the design, namely useful content) is now effectively dead. And Internet-Magazov even more. Too difficult, you see.
4. I agree completely. Also on the list.
PS. Yeah. Et people not immediately vkurivaet. But not the desired section on the other side.
PPS. No, the solution here is not important.Some will fall even poumenshayu (vertical), but they are all in the fact that the air was much, because without them anywhere, otherwise dirt will.
PPPS. It's a pity. Hear someone inexperienced would: -) And then people such questions arise, there is no limit to the number of tips on the site that need to be everywhere povtykat.
Thank you for your comments!

14.11.2014 0:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium antiphates / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

14.11.2014 0:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prioneris philonome / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.

14.11.2014 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prioneris philonome / Confidently identified / Andrey Kravtsov.

13.11.2014 23:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lygephila vulcanea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.11.2014 22:34, Shamil Murtazin:

I throw tezisno ideas for "mozgoshturmovaniya":
1. When the page loads you can see only the top three of the goods and, at times, half of them.
2. Pictures directory.2a a different background and distracting
Photo 2b the same goods are not the same type =) (here so skazanul)
2c only one photo (general plan), some products
(in small letters) Place photos done so that, for example, fiberglass handle can not see it from the fiber.
3. Use about 50% of the width of the screen (I have a 1920x1080)
4.In the main, probably should have most viewed, best selling, the most requested (and there are, for example, was not, and now on sale), and only then, down in the basement, just random items.

More should try povybirat in the catalog and do a couple of test orders.

P.S. I found that the site has a news section :)
P.P.S.IMHO between elements in the imposition left rather large margins. possibly due to my screen resolution ...
P.P.P.S. More must be borne in mind that my main work activity is connected with work on the computer ...

13.11.2014 22:11, Peter Khramov:

What is the objective? Not bad washes.

13.11.2014 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus thersites / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.11.2014 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

I still see and probably will be in the exact, does not hurry. :)

13.11.2014 21:32, Peter Khramov:

The inaccurate?

13.11.2014 21:32, Peter Khramov:

What was it?..

13.11.2014 21:31, Peter Khramov:

Yes, ergonomics and interesting. She had twisted by the time, but every once outside perspective is valuable, so Shamil distribute. And to the rest of the people also appeal itself.

13.11.2014 21:28, Peter Khramov:

Basil, access to Skype, chtot phone did not get through to you. Alexander and tama uzho.

13.11.2014 21:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

emaculata have Kononenko is another butterfly, vulcanea - only with yellow scales, similar legofil not see, but Kononenko, it is somewhat brighter.

13.11.2014 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genitals ???
I should add, ladies and gentlemen, figure out post here some banal type ornithopter and other sailing? It will be easier to swear :)

13.11.2014 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, there is no horse in a vacuum :)

13.11.2014 19:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Neponyatok not. For me. Site normal.
If you make changes to become - what?
Probably, it is necessary to tighten up the "ergonomics". If interested can distribute a lot of any fines.

13.11.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.butterflycorner.net/Graphium-antiphates-Fuenfstrich-Schwertschwanz-Fivebar-Swordtail.88.0.html

13.11.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

13.11.2014 18:21, Irina Nikulina:

I revised and vulcanea, all Lygephila 37th region. Of all DV-only view emaculata, who in the 40th, too, dwells nowhere found (according to VV Dubatolov this species was collected in the vicinity of Khabarovsk). You're right, Sasha, lies only vulcanea (again, as with Sesamia turpis, for Sinev seaside view is in the region of 37?).

13.11.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So subspecies for Peninsular Malaysia is given there. Maybe justPrioneris philonomeBoisduval, 1836:
http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Malaysia%20-%20Prioneris%20philonome.htm?

13.11.2014 16:53, Peter Khramov:

I do not mean with respect to Lepstora and respect the horse in a vacuum. Ie Are there any disadvantages / neponyatnki interface in use.

13.11.2014 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I forgot to write as determined :)
First, the traditional mothsofborneo: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_21_12.php (similar in appearance species is not found). Geography kind of taken out the same.
Then gugleniya by name:
1) http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=42875
2) http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=175888
In my opinion the same no options :)

13.11.2014 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have no questions. Lepstor remained the same in my opinion. Only the name has changed :)

13.11.2014 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate, although quite sure of the correctness. Please check just in case and make a decision.

13.11.2014 14:49, Andrey Kravtsov:

Thank you for your determination!

13.11.2014 14:31, Alex Dumchus:

Fishka- the difference in colors

13.11.2014 14:29, Andrey Kravtsov:

Two underside -one red, the other yellow-what chip?

13.11.2014 14:24, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium antiphates

13.11.2014 14:17, Andrey Kravtsov:

Many thanks for defining, thank you!

13.11.2014 14:05, Andrey Kravtsov:

Perhaps Prioneris philonome clemanthe M (Doubleday, 1846) http://yutaka.it-n.jp/pie/20200010.html

13.11.2014 13:05, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. What other subspecies have priamus blue?

13.11.2014 11:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Graphium androcles / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

13.11.2014 10:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lygephila craccae / Vitaly Gumenuk Lygephila viciae / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.11.2014 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's right. Bestolku nose: it is not (
Only if the mustache, but the hammer polukilogramovym :)
Pun: a good mood :)

13.11.2014 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lygephila vulcanea?

13.11.2014 10:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I Ognevok Borneo 2 mattresses 40 * 30 cm. The number of species - is beyond counting (> 50 exactly), but the literature to define them no. Therefore, waiting in the wings.

13.11.2014 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, thank you, Dim. I basically had no doubt. Ligniodesov something like a little :)
Again, a new kind of gentlemen :)
Today it is still loading: there basting ....

13.11.2014 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just a guess. As the most frequent, blue.

13.11.2014 8:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Without labels ssp. urvillianus? How to define? Not only this subspecies blue)))

13.11.2014 8:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

13.11.2014 8:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

13.11.2014 8:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

13.11.2014 8:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We had to take the hand of the cephalothorax

13.11.2014 1:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of ... Also in the exact wanted.

13.11.2014 0:52, Peter Khramov:

Andrew, write to geography as well.

13.11.2014 0:52, Peter Khramov:

On the nose, the nose had to click!

13.11.2014 0:22, Peter Khramov:

Question to those who were at the site Naturalist : comfortable / uncomfortable? It is clear / not clear? Some questions arose thread interface, they say, how the?

13.11.2014 0:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Heh heh ... It's all I have ognevok-travyanok not take there the. A beautiful, but with some problems. Here our not understand ....

13.11.2014 0:10, Yuri Semejkin:

No top. What it is not pushing it too lazy to see the wings spread.

12.11.2014 23:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

12.11.2014 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you. And with another new species. Now only in the exact right.

12.11.2014 23:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema albula / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 23:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 23:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

12.11.2014 23:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yeah, let the people look the same

12.11.2014 23:12, Peter Khramov:

And that is not transferred immediately? There sumneniya?

12.11.2014 23:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio macilentus / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 23:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio macilentus / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 23:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Pachliopta kotzebuea / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 23:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Vanessa tameamea / Andrey Kravtsov Pachliopta kotzebuea / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 23:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pachliopta kotzebuea?

12.11.2014 22:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just ask to check. Although the label did not see the options.

12.11.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please check definition

12.11.2014 22:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

)))

12.11.2014 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

A label where?

12.11.2014 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Endemic to Hawaii

12.11.2014 22:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema venusta

12.11.2014 22:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema

12.11.2014 22:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema albula

12.11.2014 22:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema venusta, the lower white, like, no one else is

12.11.2014 22:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis sennae

12.11.2014 22:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pierella lena or Pierella astyoche

12.11.2014 21:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

again, without labels. and in fact the first photo for the species

12.11.2014 21:16, Alex Dumchus:

I have everything else unfinished art education, so their views are unlikely to ever change. The artists did not draw on the pictures of moles and guarded them from their canvases .Well they are not interested in (moles) sovsem- I love big, bright, beautiful ... so me fot the little gray moths do not wait :)

12.11.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing exotic podmognёm with small things. Currently mattresses with 6 hefty raznousymi. Every day can be on the mind or more submit before the end of winter. The main thing is to determine the true and without hassle. All hope is on the site, so as to put them bestolku molbiol ..

12.11.2014 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

I got it, on the first question. In the second, the extra information is requested to remove, in the form of inaccurate, comments the author details, and all of them it is clear that that does not understand :)

12.11.2014 20:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This Corades but without a top view will not say

12.11.2014 20:35, Peter Khramov:

What do you mean, where moth-Miniatures and where disgusting? Well this is the charm, and not creatures! However, not yet fully micro unillustrated us. Even from 77000. Not to mention 200,000.

12.11.2014 20:34, Peter Khramov:

1. Because the only alternative at the moment - general lack of commentary in the Russian version. In English one does not go to check. Because it's better than nothing.

12.11.2014 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Question 1: Why and on Russian and English version, the English text, the author's comments?
Question 2 .: Are there additional information that it is not a precise definition, or a new form of either a new kind ?. I think that says it all in the comments of the author. Or I mistranslated?

12.11.2014 20:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Bia actorion / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 20:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes this is Bia actorion !!!

12.11.2014 20:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I was 10 years old do not think so)))

12.11.2014 20:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Corades enyo / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 20:00, Alex Dumchus:

Well then, another 10 years will remain in his opinion

12.11.2014 19:59, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, the look already.

12.11.2014 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

12.11.2014 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

12.11.2014 19:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

synonyms

12.11.2014 19:57, Alex Dumchus:

Whose definition? In Shirli- koreziya ...

12.11.2014 19:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa carye / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 19:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa carye / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 19:55, Alex Dumchus:

Tomorrow I will give the top and underside of his. This kind of the way. very variativen.

12.11.2014 19:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

top need

12.11.2014 19:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Catonephele numilia / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 19:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Catonephele numilia / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 19:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Catonephele numilia / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 19:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Marpesia zerynthia / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

12.11.2014 19:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

topless I pass.

12.11.2014 19:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

whom no fact that the desire to shoot, but look at them nasty :)
I also thought 15 years ago

12.11.2014 18:44, Alex Dumchus:

Well, Duc 200,000 include mainly mic, whom no fact that the desire to shoot, but look at them nasty :)
Whether business or Saturnia sailboat - "vizmesh in hands- toil vesch" :)

12.11.2014 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

Top 14516

12.11.2014 18:19, Alex Dumchus:

Rather Delias hyparete. I have a copy of exactly the same in Malaysia

12.11.2014 17:06, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps somehow missed ... Shamil rights -Lycaena helle, male (see. Photo in the group)

12.11.2014 16:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And this one can not identify?

12.11.2014 16:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where its top?

12.11.2014 16:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias, but still need a top

12.11.2014 16:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Calagi. Total 200,000 5,000 of error)))

12.11.2014 16:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarcinodes malakarius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.11.2014 16:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.11.2014 16:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio rumanzovia / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

12.11.2014 16:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Troides rhadamantus / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 16:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Troides rhadamantus / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 16:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Troides rhadamantus / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 16:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Troides rhadamantus / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 15:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarcinodes malakarius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

12.11.2014 15:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.11.2014 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Variability was. In males, there are individuals with and without tails (caught on the same tree both)

12.11.2014 15:34, Yuri Semejkin:

There seems to be a male?

12.11.2014 15:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Dmitriy! But what has caused the absence of red spots on the hind wings in this image http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33354. Also female

12.11.2014 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If the question about the authorship of any shutter. I do not care. The main two opinions coincide.

12.11.2014 13:55, Yuri Semejkin:

If I am not mistaken it Caligo eurilochus? I watched the images on an Internet.

12.11.2014 13:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio polytes / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

12.11.2014 12:57, Jan Rasmussen:

Gillmeria sp.? *

12.11.2014 12:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I wanted to write yesterday Sarcinodes malakarius, but did not have time to check and continental fauna I do not know, so I wrote to sort

12.11.2014 12:47, Jan Rasmussen: This species is identified correctly.

12.11.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I'm kidding :) Thanks for the tip. Distribution of check-matter say. VaughnMacrobrochis borneensison the Malay Peninsula and the flies, probably just the exact opposite.

12.11.2014 11:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I agonized with them last month, it was 6 species.

12.11.2014 11:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Fu .. All corny brought vodka.)

12.11.2014 11:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So on an Internet not pour ..... Distribution should look. Yes, and the specific name is still in favor of the Peninsula says if I'm not mistaken.

12.11.2014 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morpho menelaus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.11.2014 8:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is no certainty. You need to look original description.

12.11.2014 8:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! Here you are wrong. These only cut. When you look and put a series of mesta- obaldeesh variability.

12.11.2014 8:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

C I owed _Budesh in Moscow, come _ (((

12.11.2014 8:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Female Male.

12.11.2014 8:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

So it was necessary to write a country without any explanations about not let the label.

12.11.2014 8:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Very similar to Borneo I defined as: Sarcinodes malakarius, but on the mainland Malayzii- not know.

12.11.2014 8:16, Alex Dumchus:

He, Morpho menelaus, although slightly palely probably ssp godartii or amaphonte

12.11.2014 5:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've got all the data. And where I can spread it on a mandatory basis.

12.11.2014 5:27, Peter Khramov:

Dim, he had a good friend of the businessman type, not ebeyschik from Uruguay, so infe geography believe it is possible.

12.11.2014 5:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tend to option:Sarcinodes malakarius
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=96875
P.S. It looks like I've got more representatives of Malaysia. I will spread, after this we shall understand.

12.11.2014 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It plans to put it ......
I suppose that the same small mammal opera as this one: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34787
I suggest to understand: in the next term, new look.

12.11.2014 3:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill. You'll be in Moscow, come :)

12.11.2014 2:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, Laos 100% There is a material without any geography and normal ....

12.11.2014 2:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sarcinodes malakariusvsSarcinodes restitutaria? Later....
Dmitry, owed much :)

12.11.2014 1:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! Photographed through the glass, and I have no way to get it out to remove the top and underside of one individual. There is a picture neighboring butterflies, but what it is I do not know. Wait a background replacement and skins, can be the same?

11.11.2014 23:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitri if endure :) I'm sure the difference between marcella and corita dimly see. :)

11.11.2014 23:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, I apologize, it's about sex mean the information Basil :)

11.11.2014 23:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And if before the race, then what is owed? And for the family? A subfamily of?

11.11.2014 23:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The label is not fully at liberty to FIG publikovat- not write that Laos. Merchants hiding labels can tell a lie and the continent

11.11.2014 23:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Marpesia marcella

11.11.2014 22:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

At altitudes from 1240 to 1460, I caught only Tanaorhinus rafflesii

11.11.2014 22:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm talking about the floor like anything and did not write)))

11.11.2014 22:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Moths, Oenochrominae, Sarcinodes sp

11.11.2014 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C owed me if you can bring though, would be to a family / subfamily.
I honestly can not. I do not spread to, but I think in the long term is another new vid.Tak same butterfly in the morning and laid out on molbiole in teie appropriate, and there, the reaction-zero.
P.S. Someone like a familiar, but fails to understand way.

11.11.2014 17:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morpho menelaus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

11.11.2014 17:34, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho menelaus, and where the top?

11.11.2014 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ornithoptera croesus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

11.11.2014 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ornithoptera priamus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

11.11.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ornithoptera priamus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

11.11.2014 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ornithoptera priamus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

11.11.2014 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Morpho helenor Morpho montezuma.

11.11.2014 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Morpho helenor Morpho montezuma.

11.11.2014 14:29, Yuri Semejkin:

I see now. Doubts were little, that's tossed, to dispel them. Without Photoshop can not do, because shooting was in adverse conditions (dark, artificial lights throbbing, shooting through the glass, background package -which had to be replaced, etc.)
Definitions are, now you can remove. Everything is at your discretion.From now on I will try not to throw too much.

11.11.2014 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Morpho helenor Morpho montezuma.

11.11.2014 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, is now engaged in the transfer of Dmitri, Peter and Alexander. I'm in touch, I do not know how much time (
It is said that the issue was not me.

11.11.2014 13:59, Alex Dumchus:

Basil or Dmitriy. How many of you are now involved in the transfer. It turned out that this Morpho montezuma - Now it is a subspecies of M / helenor. Therefore, transfer foty 25258, 25038 and 25259 in montezuma montezuma or combine with helenor (though I am opposed to combination of species).

11.11.2014 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also put in inaccurate. Laos Unknown distributing official.

11.11.2014 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri. Here a butterfly Photo 35182 and 35183, only different degrees of use of Photoshop, decide :), and better off without him :)

11.11.2014 13:15, Alex Dumchus:

Ornithoptera priamus, female

11.11.2014 13:15, Alex Dumchus:

Ornithoptera priamus, female

11.11.2014 13:14, Alex Dumchus:

Ornithoptera priamus, female

11.11.2014 13:13, Alex Dumchus:

Yuri. Why repeat it? This photo 34955: Ornithoptera croesus

11.11.2014 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

11.11.2014 10:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Anticipating possible questions:
It should be inaccurate due to the geography of the collection. Pouostrovnaya Malaysia for the species is not listed on boldsystems: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=98781 and other resources. However, the form is easily recognizable and in my opinion no one confused.

11.11.2014 1:54, Vladimir Bobow:

Butterfly photographed July 16, 2014

11.11.2014 1:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why, you can not fear to touch my photos on one condition: if you definitely know that definition is incorrect, and the butterfly is in the exact .
Today's KLEOR should not have to touch in my opinion. I will explain in detail how it was determined.First stumbled on flickr, on the hook (a hook, so as this resource can not be trusted, but there are a lot of photos): https://www.flickr.com/photos/berniedup/15068658904/
Then drove into the search engine a name and came up to the moths of borneo: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Boarmiini/boarmiini_28_6.php
I read the geography of where it says: "Geographical range. Borneo, Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra." . Though infe 30 years, a butterfly habitat has not changed, so that it became a purely island views.Peninsular Malaysia is suitable, the material there and he got first hand. Already the "heat."
Then again, seeking and finding has two links (possible):
1) http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=45873
2) http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/10820038
Everything has a base (given that looked and others have succeeded kinds Malaysia) set to the form.
This is my definition of an algorithm with this view.While the starting material in my arms, in the dried form rather than in the form of images on a network. I think this time my eyes have not deceived me. It happens from time to time of 200 species manages to single out the one with the best definition. As well as the case that "in two pines mistaken."Value from the beginning to ask about it here and not ask questions directly to the page with the photo.
By the way, I was looking for a very different butterfly, which still can not get out in any way, so it is not necessary even in the uncertainty:

(found later)
P.S. Peter, please do not delete this post.This base in more detail why the view is defined correctly.

10.11.2014 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Welcome, until Thursday, I'm afraid even to touch the photo Basil and if the stand only on his instructions. :)))

10.11.2014 22:37, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, for your comments I fotoy with Basil just cleaned up, leaving only the essence without going to the individual. For the future: it is clear that it is necessary once again to phone us and all three of us discuss calmly. I suggest to do it on Thursday night. And until we phoned:
1. Vasily ship foty its definitions
2.You can not tolerate them anywhere, but if you disagree, you write in the comments, we do not agree, and the same arguments (many similar species, variability, etc.)
When the call each other, poreshat what to do in such situations, and then come back to this fotam.At the same time on your objections Basil will not answer, they are still (up to phone) will not debate, but simply to mark foty to which you want to come back after a phoned.
Good?

10.11.2014 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

That I suffered from a kind, that there would not write too much, although the topic.
Basil and I'm saying that you define as you wish. And do you know, unfortunately, not very deep, and all of us here are not specialists. But I go critical, and you surface. The first link lepbarcoding.org, butterflies are determined not by appearance but by barkodinku, too, there are mistakes, but they are working initially with museum specimens of certain professionals. Look here born http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/TaxBrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=5582. Maybe you're right with the definition, but believe me when it's more coincidence than the rule.In the collection you can put any name for butterflies, but the site is desirable to put the correct definition. :))) And Basil, I'll stop when you stop so superficial determine.

10.11.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=45873
Here's a simpler life, but not a European, and there the: http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/10820038

10.11.2014 21:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, this kind of scared varies, it is difficult to find two identical, light-dark, drawing clear, blurry, there are more than 200 species, and are you looking for the island butterfly and the only image in the photo site on the network, where the confidence that there is a correct definition?

10.11.2014 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

INFA must be in both versions.
Second, there is no version of information in from England and at the same time it is in Russian: the disorder. So I want to drive in this very English infu (on aglitski essno).

10.11.2014 21:36, Peter Khramov:

Ok, otherwise I raise the question: do you put in the Russian version of the Old and you want it to be in English, or do you want to lay in the English version separately from the Russian? If the second - what are the reasons?

10.11.2014 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She did not find the twins. KLEOR there are many, and such as this are no more.
Tomorrow cook another 2 species from different families. Will 5021 :)

10.11.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The main question I will put the view from Malaysia, it is absolutely :) I know how hammered infa: even as it filled with as long as you can become. Just that nobody was shocked that he personally hammered be :) And the network of its present photo from Malaysia.

10.11.2014 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Do not hesitate. Very brave. :))

10.11.2014 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

boldsystems cites labels: Bhutan, China, Taiwan. Information is driven from the literature or Web sites, as well as a private message. :))

10.11.2014 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Globia sparganii / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov Sesamia turpis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2014 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

I looked at all here: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Marpesia_a.htm
I do not want to go into the jungle, who does it, it is necessary to watch the distribution of all three species, and may come in such M. corinna, but such an image search engine provides only for lepidoptera and learnaboutbutterflies.com, but there is generally Marpesia marcella. :) You can trust the label can be the eyes, but it is better to read the literature. :))

10.11.2014 20:02, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, come back here, forgotten about it) revised during this time rather than toSesamia turpisdo not lay down. Look one more time, please, I think your assumptions about it are true http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/23Hadeninae/3783_Sesamia/3783_Sesamia_turpis/Sesamia_turpis.html Or at least from Globia sparganii in swing. till

10.11.2014 19:06, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander, at the same time look http://butterfliesofamerica.com/marpesia_marcella_valetta_specimens.htm. You'll be surprised.

10.11.2014 19:02, Alex Dumchus:

And all-taki found underside - my Marpesia corinna 100% http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/marpesia_corinna_types.htm

10.11.2014 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When logging in the English version there is no reference "Adding a form", in any language, and a Russian version infa there is not tolerated.

10.11.2014 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Take to the system area. Regarding the type of moth Hypochrosis rufescens (Butler, 1880) , has made this kind, based on the EOL (in the corresponding race was not). There http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=98781 findings listed in India, China, and Taiwan. I have the material for it from Peninsular Malaysia (tomorrow I plan to put a photo). And the more I found no information about rasprostraneniiyu.By the way: Dear boldsystems rests with the publication of information on Neuvazliayev Wikipedia: "Hypochrosis rufescens is a moth of the Geometridae family. It is found in India, China and Taiwan. Full article at Wikipedia" (it is to that is, whether to trust boldsystems?). Trite no idea how to drive in geography?
P.S. And here: http://www.encyclo.co.uk/define/Hypochrosis%20rufescens referring to Wikipedia (

10.11.2014 18:50, Alex Dumchus:

Yeah, like, I received from a reputable source. Written by: Peru, Tingo Maria ... and now, as in the famous joke about a nun - no one can be trusted! :)

10.11.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Meet the 5019 th kind :)

10.11.2014 17:56, Peter Khramov:

Peter, of a version from England, of course.
I asked instead of or in addition. The answer is "out of" I do not understand.

10.11.2014 17:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

10.11.2014 17:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

10.11.2014 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not say so directly, but you spoke about the sling, so I looked it at them different. Maybe label the problem as geography and by type? ;)

10.11.2014 17:46, Alex Dumchus:

And like M.corita not found in Peru, although it seems ...

10.11.2014 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

10.11.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

10.11.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male mustache

10.11.2014 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

10.11.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

10.11.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

10.11.2014 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

10.11.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The male (tassel clearly visible).

10.11.2014 17:40, Alex Dumchus:

It is obtained from a trusted source with a label

10.11.2014 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The most common. Get out.

10.11.2014 17:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why is the form? common butterfly.

10.11.2014 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.11.2014 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

10.11.2014 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.11.2014 15:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ornithoptera meridionalis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.11.2014 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, made by hand specifically for this butterfly. And in general, do not have them there in all my (Gluck, and to all manually interrupt not strong enough .......
Peter, of a version from England, of course.

10.11.2014 15:09, Alex Dumchus:

I think Ornithoptera meridionalis, but the male-EU

10.11.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

No label data copies. at ANL. version.

10.11.2014 14:37, Peter Khramov:

In vesriya English instead of Russian and Russian in addition (ie transfer)?

10.11.2014 14:34, Peter Khramov:

I mean, Shamil?

10.11.2014 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I have done.

10.11.2014 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ornithoptera paradisea ?, male

10.11.2014 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ornithoptera priamus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.11.2014 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.11.2014 13:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

And I did not have time :))

10.11.2014 13:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ornithoptera priamusmale

10.11.2014 12:44, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Congratulations!
I bow before you, my wonderful enthusiasts and professionals!

10.11.2014 12:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

But this probably Marpesia corita.

10.11.2014 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marpesia corinna / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.11.2014 12:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas feronia / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.11.2014 11:33, Alex Dumchus:

Vanessa myrinna ?

10.11.2014 11:30, Alex Dumchus:

Marpesia corinna, she is best delineated tape on the front wings

10.11.2014 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.11.2014 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2014 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Artopoetes pryeri / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Not identified.

10.11.2014 10:57, Shamil Murtazin:

It's all new authors on the site? ..)

10.11.2014 10:54, Irina Nikulina:

New in 1000 came less than a year) is already halfway to the cherished planned 10,000) Congratulations!

10.11.2014 10:41, Irina Nikulina:

It's more of a femaleCelastrina ladonides(possibly saving generation. Volodya, it would be desirable to indicate the date of shooting) have a slightly different color pryeri, and ZK - quite clear bright field and there is a series of dark spots along the edge.

10.11.2014 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.11.2014 10:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.11.2014 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scolitantides orion Lycaena phlaeas.

10.11.2014 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scolitantides orion / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.11.2014 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scolitantides orion / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.11.2014 10:00, Alexander Belousov:

This is just the beginning!

10.11.2014 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lycaena phlaeasidentity is female? The question marks are because Sinev too busy right now to climb :)

10.11.2014 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lycaena disparfemale?

10.11.2014 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C round figure!

10.11.2014 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter Reserve this for me please that position: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1949
For years, Vladimir Meshchora monitors and it will be interesting to read :)

10.11.2014 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Types serious hurt to the so-rule (
It is rather improper storage, or simply do not look for a collection. Near the ocean, the humidity is high .... That leads hurl (

10.11.2014 8:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ornithoptera croesus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.11.2014 8:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio polytes / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

10.11.2014 8:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio polytes / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

10.11.2014 8:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio polytes / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

10.11.2014 8:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides rhadamantus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2014 8:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides rhadamantus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2014 8:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morpho helenor / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.11.2014 8:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.11.2014 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Troides rhadamantus

10.11.2014 8:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very beautiful figure :)))

10.11.2014 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hands would be put in place to anyone who spreads them butterflies.

10.11.2014 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ornithoptera priamus / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.11.2014 8:09, Alex Dumchus:

Heliconius melpomene ?

10.11.2014 8:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa sundana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2014 8:07, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho helenor

10.11.2014 8:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa sundana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2014 8:05, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo, similar to the underside memnon

10.11.2014 8:01, Alex Dumchus:

Anartia jatrophae

10.11.2014 4:10, Peter Khramov:

And that knit - it is written about a week w ...

10.11.2014 1:37, Peter Khramov:

Well INTO same! As gritstsa made. Surpassed 5000 species illustrated! As gritstsa, congratulations to all the bright holiday, there is no reason not to drink. Well, it is. Let's continue.

10.11.2014 1:36, Peter Khramov:

More than 170 ph Venezuela.

10.11.2014 0:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, in imprecise it is already from the moment of the download :)
The question arose what species it is now better to put (back to inaccurate). There were options for them and I have not yet considered. I give my opinion later. And up to this point it's nothing to do.

10.11.2014 0:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! Such outlet they have not seen. In the house, except for the flying exhibition takes place dried, stored under glass. Ie This copies. of dried.

09.11.2014 23:33, Peter Khramov:

So what, in the inaccurate?

09.11.2014 23:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

09.11.2014 23:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

09.11.2014 23:04, Irina Nikulina:

Sarbanissa sundanacite references, we have already discussed it - photo # 23481

09.11.2014 22:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxyodes scrobiculata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2014 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxyodes scrobiculata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Callidrepana patrana

09.11.2014 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Irene. It is. Checked: in only 2 years old type and this one fits into one :)

09.11.2014 19:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bhutanitis lidderdalii / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.11.2014 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erygia antecedens Felinia precedens.

09.11.2014 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erygia antecedens Felinia precedens.

09.11.2014 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Basil species are very similar, the overriding right.

09.11.2014 19:25, Irina Nikulina:

Calpinae it. MaleOxyodes scrobiculata, I think

09.11.2014 19:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, two kinds of issue raised Iran, not to "the beginning." Long comments, that does not add, and that does not take away from the butterfly, they help to determine the most likely, the species of the butterfly.With the unique ability to accurately determine the type, abandon it in favor of "philately" (normal collections, normally The prepared butterfly looks as aesthetically pleasing as The prepared not, as is often not the prepared forms of genital twins do not look right, if not boiled).The only instance of it, or a series, it does not matter, often just a single copy and cook. :) The given butterfly pereraspravka desirable, the rear fenders are very omitted when macerating Prepare a neat belly, genitals lessons digested.But such a deal only with very great aesthetes, easier to cook part of the body and gently placed a sealed capsule butterfly. But this is a private matter, well, requires a certain expertise. So it's all in front, if you engage seriously.:)) Remove any that do not, to reliably determine the type of the genus, there are several options, the two announced, one present arguments can take it to inaccurately determined. and there he will stay until a possible (or not possible) cooking :))))

09.11.2014 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Beauty will save the world :)

09.11.2014 18:23, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strange .. It seems a familiar animal, but who it is, I can not understand (even to the kind of ......
Requirement ....

09.11.2014 16:58, Alex Dumchus:

Peter! (Sternly frowning) Where the dry material ???

09.11.2014 16:50, Irina Nikulina:

Now I agree), but do not really understand why you are in this case, since "good" comments about the pictures on mothsofborheo. In general, they are, of course, there are bad, but when it comes to comparing the two types, they are just a good idea to illustrate the main differences identified in Diagnosis - elongation of the PC at the apex and large concave distal border of the triangular patches have antecedens.This is clearly evident when they are near - http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/miscellaneous_i/gallery.php

09.11.2014 16:20, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 16:20, Alex Dumchus:

Yuri, is an instance of the collection of the garden or are these conclusions?

09.11.2014 16:18, Alex Dumchus:

Ornithoptera priamus urvillianus, camets

09.11.2014 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ornithoptera priamusssp. urvillianus (Guérin-Menéville, 1838)

09.11.2014 16:09, Alex Dumchus:

It is difficult to say anything specific with such a position. There, except for pure species has countless sea hybrids T.helena. - Commercial butterfly ... it is necessary to recognize the house of butterflies.

09.11.2014 16:04, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 16:01, Alex Dumchus:

In no case do not atlas is samia or kohlii or kanningi, without geography is not defined, and with difficult geography - are very similar.

09.11.2014 15:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apologize. Here I am, just made a mistake in determining the (((. It is still at the local classificationFelinia precedens: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=326983
Here and there she Erygia precedens: http://www.chiba-muse.or.jp/NATURAL/special/moth/Haruta_Collection/80_Noctuidae/08_Catocalinae/Erygia/Erygia_precedens/Erygia_precedens.htm (only the normal image).
It's just confused focusing on the disgusting pictures with mothsofborheo
Once again wildly izvinyabs to all concerned.
It is necessary to move.

09.11.2014 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You can see here: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=161039

09.11.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So, what to do then? Cooking it can not be: a series, that is another matter (single copies. No one cooks, as far as I know). Moreover, this is not the suburbs.
You can remove all pictures until better times?

09.11.2014 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ornithoptera croesus

09.11.2014 14:45, Pavel Ivanov:

Nadozhe how amazing! Yes, even a three-dimensional image of a butterfly on it! :) (About the first photo)

09.11.2014 14:22, Pavel Ivanov: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Psilogramma sp.

09.11.2014 14:02, Pavel Ivanov: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 13:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

09.11.2014 13:57, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I renamed. On this site instituted so that only human names ...

09.11.2014 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bhutanitis lidderdalii

09.11.2014 13:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I know them: both species are exhibited.
I repeat: the only risk, without geography butterfly.

09.11.2014 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2014 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siproeta stelenes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2014 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 12:12, Irina Nikulina:

Troides rhadamantus?

09.11.2014 12:01, Irina Nikulina:

Siproeta stelenes?

09.11.2014 11:58, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio memnon (P. m. lowi Druce, 1873) ?

09.11.2014 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I removed the definition of what would be on the search engines do not jump clear mistake, I simply do not know these types, but now is not the time to understand the evening bear :)

09.11.2014 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The origin of the need to find out. Most likely it is that if the origin of the Malay (in the houses there are usually butterflies), and there are only 2 types of Samia: http://wildsilkmoth-indonesia.com/pic_mala/mskoh.html

09.11.2014 11:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

09.11.2014 11:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

09.11.2014 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Attacus atlas / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Not identified.

09.11.2014 11:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

09.11.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anteos maerula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.11.2014 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, it is by no means slluchae not Attacus atlas. It is even another generation.
It Samia sp. I think the femaleSamia kohlli(without geography is not very good).

09.11.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, in the English version, we can not add data to the form? The fact that he wanted to add, and there is no reference to this: http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/120581 way: it is already in Google just indexed version pro., And there is no data.

09.11.2014 10:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male. There are only 3 types: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Anteos_a.htm

09.11.2014 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 10:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I presume that the origin of the material is likely to Asia.

09.11.2014 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2014 9:51, Pavel Ivanov:

Yes!

09.11.2014 9:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tom Tams Alex Dumchus.

09.11.2014 9:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idea blanchardii.

09.11.2014 9:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Tom Tams.

09.11.2014 9:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idea leuconoe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

09.11.2014 9:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dichagyris signifera / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2014 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hebomoia leucippe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

09.11.2014 9:13, Alex Dumchus:

It is likely Philippine subspecies ledebouria, male without tails

09.11.2014 9:11, Alex Dumchus:

Looks

09.11.2014 9:11, Alex Dumchus:

Idea blanchardi ?

09.11.2014 9:10, Alex Dumchus:

Idea leuconoe

09.11.2014 9:04, Alex Dumchus:

Anteos menippe

09.11.2014 9:03, Alex Dumchus:

Hebomoia leucippe

09.11.2014 6:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio demoleus. In principle, the same as here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34744
It does not become a point name for the reason that if you look underside here, it is light. If you look at the link, it is yellow. Could not this difference is regarded as a male-female?

09.11.2014 1:08, Irina Nikulina:

Dichagyris signifera?

09.11.2014 1:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander put to the inaccurate and that's that. It was conducted from the beginning of the two types. It was established on the basis of geography. Cooking, ruled for single copies. even in perspective.

09.11.2014 0:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra tragopoginis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2014 0:26, Irina Nikulina:

Amphipyra tragopoginis?

09.11.2014 0:04, Peter Khramov:

Paul called you, I understand correctly?

08.11.2014 21:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ornithoptera priamus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

08.11.2014 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.11.2014 21:38, Irina Nikulina:

Xestia baja?

08.11.2014 21:34, Pavel Ivanov:

Maybe so! But you do not understand! Let the dark!

08.11.2014 20:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Anteos maerulaguess

08.11.2014 20:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anteos menippe / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.11.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Offhand South AmericanAnteos menippeyour phone is difficult to determine. Please check and move if I'm right.

08.11.2014 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maybe just a little light, and that dark shape :)

08.11.2014 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

08.11.2014 18:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would put in inaccurate, at best, as well as to the family. Basil, you persuade yourself? or other? For others, these arguments do not work, this data 30 years ago. Clearly states reliably different in the genitals. I, frankly, a few species can cause, it is very similar to this kind. There is a butterfly, it is necessary to cook. Only then accurate.

08.11.2014 18:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.11.2014 18:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Teinopalpus imperialis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.11.2014 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.11.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.11.2014 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Teinopalpus imperialis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.11.2014 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, the foundation here notorious habit. On this basis, there are put in inaccurate picture of nature. Of course I will discuss your options tomorrow. But on the cooking can not be considered. This will mean the loss of a single specimen. (There would be a lot ....

08.11.2014 13:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Attacus attas

08.11.2014 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would like the base were announced. I'm sure they are, but I do not think you can specify them. :)) The simplest option to cook. Images of all three species there. :)

08.11.2014 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I think for the production in the base are inaccurate here :) Now I have at the hands of a few hundred of these mysteries. I'll put them slowly and I hope to help in the definition. And the site need photos of species that are often on it, and not at all.

08.11.2014 10:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio polytes ?

08.11.2014 10:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio polytes ?

08.11.2014 10:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio polytes ?

08.11.2014 8:21, Alex Dumchus:

Ornithoptera priamus, the female is likely ssp priamus

08.11.2014 4:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I am quite convinced geography with mothsofborneo
I quote it here just in case:
Ericeia korintjiensis : "Geographical range. Sumatra, Java, Borneo" .
Ericeia pertendens : "Geographical range. Indo-Australian tropics to Solomons" .
From which it follows that Ericeia korintjiensis purely insular view and Ericeia pertendens is very widespread in almost the whole of Southeast Asia.
The concrete specimens.to the islands of Java, Sumatra and Borneo has nothing to do: he from mainland (Peninsular) Malaysia. Of course, I admit findings in Mainland type Ericeia korintjiensis, but, given the spread of the above can only be single / vagrants.

08.11.2014 1:07, Irina Nikulina:

I asked cautiously about the kind korintjiensis - http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=224758 (of the peninsula. Malaysia has charges) Externally very similar to pertendens and reliably distinguished only genital, here in the Diagnosis of this and written http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/hulodini/hulodini_4_7.php
Maybe not worth it in the exact place, considering it? Or do their appearance is something quite reliably distinguished? On pictures on the network is difficult to say.Or geography, at this mothsofborneo, convinced? What do you think?

08.11.2014 0:53, Peter Khramov:

Dimitri! What do you think? Tochnyak? No?

08.11.2014 0:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Costal margin white, it is limited to the three listed species, taking into account the lack of literature for Oenospila altistrix distribution outside Borneo, you said Basil. I just showed you the options that you do not see what would change your opinion.I understand a complex issue, but it is impossible to grasp at first got a similar kind :))
Without editor butterfly looks much better. :))

07.11.2014 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And do not move, whether all photos without underside rafflesii / viridiluteata in inaccurate?
On the upper side, I do not see a difference, but they are very visible on the underside, which is not here. This is a personal opinion and fully admit that it is possible to distinguish at the top, but, I repeat: the differences on top do not see.

07.11.2014 22:38, Peter Khramov:

Come on, out of all the gloom, who are well aware of the tropics!)

07.11.2014 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Temporarily changed the photo on the source (any edition only crop). If it helps to clarify definitively with her question.

07.11.2014 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think it is not a sin one more copies. this type of load :)

07.11.2014 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, he (costal margin) is white and fairly wide. There, just need to remove the black background of my camera. Everything is going, but do not reach the hands (

07.11.2014 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I cite two more variants of Malaysia (Oenospila altistrix, lives there too):
Oenospila kopperi http://biostor.org/reference/52698 (here an article with the original description)
Oenospila microstrix http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_31_2.php (original description)
White costal margin of wing, eaten Photo Editor, which gives the right to think about something else :))

07.11.2014 18:36, Alexander Belousov:

Please help me! There were good shots for comparison, the series is collected in 20-km north of my point. It turns out that all the photos on this page - Mellicta britomartis . Mellicta alatauica completely different. The book Toropova also did not like that. I think it is necessary to transfer all the photos and rewrite the label. And how can All the same, right? Mellicta or Melitaea britomartis?

07.11.2014 18:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did not dare to put into precise: in spreading everywhere indicated only Borneo and copies. not to Borneo.
Nevertheless, it is in my opinion it is not and option I saw.

07.11.2014 17:27, Irina Nikulina:

Svetlana, to determine the kind of there, where this "quote" (picture # 34868) is a Habitat preference could play only a supporting role in all, everything is determined underside. In addition to mothsofborneo, from this observation is taken, it does not say that there rafflesii only in the plains, and viridiluteata only in the mountains. It says - especially, basically, more ..But perhaps, though less frequently, there are findings rafflesii and mountains. Can I put these 2 species in precisely defined without underside - I do not know the solution for those who know the tropics and the moderators.

07.11.2014 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry is a male, the females outer bands on the upper wing gear.
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/15_EREBINAE/025_Thyas/Thyas%20javanica/Thyas%20javanica.htm

07.11.2014 17:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

07.11.2014 17:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

07.11.2014 17:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vladimir Deryabin.

07.11.2014 17:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vladimir, we responded at the same time :), but you're a little earlier :) Yes it is large tortoiseshell, but their two garden and black-haired. Now I look at this site large tortoiseshell garden named a large tortoiseshell. Therefore, on the basis of priority, I put you to determine the type. In the future, please, put in the definition of the Latin names that have not been dvoechteniya.:)) And then I would have had before :))

07.11.2014 16:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis polychloros / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.11.2014 16:58, Vladimir Deryabin:

This large tortoiseshell?

07.11.2014 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And maybe with gderovskogo Pentacon. The name Pentacon / Topcon :)
Pentacon, incidentally great cameras do during CMEA))
Well, a good kind of Havat overwhelm commentary on abstract themes :)

07.11.2014 15:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, annexe algorithm, and in general for a long time it is necessary to develop the rules and that they are in a prominent position and in a digestible form. And then this "algorithm" all the time jumping on posts to the individual butterflies, and for all the right not to follow and even more immediately remember "what and where to write" does not work in any way: in fact on the site, "over the counter" already 27565 photos. Routine ....

07.11.2014 15:41, Peter Khramov:

Yeah. There's some piece of your search on Google found http://www.delcampe.net/page/item/id,284017868,var,Lot-Appareil-Photo-TOPCON,language,E.html. Luxury vesch! With Pentaha Stoll flogged?

07.11.2014 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah :)
Googling on request Gespanna pectoralis, open the picture and see what's still cute :)

07.11.2014 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wait a couple of days necessary. Do not rush.

07.11.2014 14:52, Peter Khramov:

Well, all the rules, we can illustrate the kind?

07.11.2014 14:51, Peter Khramov:

With Basil figured out all the rules. We should really somewhere to hang selection algorithm to determine. Just do not see where.

07.11.2014 14:50, Peter Khramov:

KrosavEts!

07.11.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C new genus on the site. And only in this genus view :)
The key to the door to look at here: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/episparis/episparis_4_1.php
Then I had to google. And the "all-powerful" Google issued photo only 2 species. It seems rare, and this image will be the third (not talking about photo underside, which generally will be the first) :) In determining sure since no one like in his quest is no longer met.

07.11.2014 14:42, Peter Khramov:

But Basil, high as a man could be removed and no outstretched hands. Yes, and a copy of hapnul to his collection, and the underside would have been available. But he persists in not wanting to go to exotics! Basil! You go to the rainforest as it is possible!

07.11.2014 14:27, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

07.11.2014 14:22, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Ha, who would have me up there on the wall in the night, it was given to the bottom-yourself show ??? Yes, not always at eye level, it is sometimes necessary to get up on his toes and do the photo on his outstretched hands blindly, with the benefit of my camera rotating screen ... 1 draft frame - on Live View, then working shots ... and pray that the hand He did not flinch or the object is not moved ...

07.11.2014 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:) On the underside to the top of these two species are virtually indistinguishable, as I understand.

07.11.2014 12:42, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Quote from Irina Nikulina: "... referring to mothsofborneo, ... note that rafflesii prefers mostly lowland and viridiluteata - alpine forest." Sorry, my butterflies, and this neighbor, lifted high in the mountains, they, too, can these viridi ..... ???

07.11.2014 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrausta aurata / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

07.11.2014 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, I have sinned in the Pyrausta falcatalis, but you do not have and should not be rasprostanenie have purpuralis on the lower wings of light band is narrow.

07.11.2014 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, maybe I'm wrong, but you brought two definitions: 1 put in the name of Borbacha punctipardaria, 2 is less likely in the comments Borbacha altipardaria. Irina reasonably chose another option.So who determine the type of? :) I always try in such matters read all comments, and Vasily, if there are two versions of the definition, it is not necessary to give a name, and the second in the comments. This species is not certain, and both names in the comments that someone decided it would be fair :))

07.11.2014 11:49, Irina Nikulina:

Do not mind the change in the definition of authorship, for me it is absolutely not important, the main thing that was correct.
But I note that all the time we come back to the discussion of the algorithm proposed here by Peter http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30976, and not once have discussed these points, for example, there http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33350. So I do not really understand your comment, Basil.

07.11.2014 11:11, Alex Lender:

I do not mind, Alexander, you know better. Considered still only option purpuralis, other options do not know.

07.11.2014 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, so be it :)
P.S. Although the cost to check out the discussion from the first to comment ....

07.11.2014 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Borbacha punctipardaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov Borbacha altipardaria / Irina Nikulina.

07.11.2014 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Borbacha punctipardaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov Borbacha altipardaria / Irina Nikulina.

07.11.2014 11:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

07.11.2014 11:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

07.11.2014 11:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) Thank you and then walked away from the company and has forgotten :)

07.11.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tanaorhinus rafflesii / Vasiliy Feoktistov Tanaorhinus viridiluteata / Irina Nikulina.

07.11.2014 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The top must also be transferred to viridiluteata

07.11.2014 9:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tanaorhinus rafflesii / Vasiliy Feoktistov Tanaorhinus viridiluteata / Irina Nikulina.

07.11.2014 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We got hands. I think an option to Borbacha altipardaria Holloway, 1982 is the most appropriate for her. It would be better to shift it to the inaccurateBorbacha altipardaria:)
N.B. Today, I upload other type of this kind. And too inaccurate. You can not put them in the exact: strictly (
Online photos are very few of these species, and mostly of information. Here only on m.Holloway and remains my hope :)
A species I have, in the collection ....

07.11.2014 9:26, Olga Titova:

She found that the butterfly pupae NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA two claws on the head.

07.11.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Alexander, you understood correctly: so. :) Everything is fit to be her Tanaorhinus viridiluteata (base below). Drag.

07.11.2014 0:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

I understand from your discussions, it is necessary to carry Tanaorhinus viridiluteata?

07.11.2014 0:11, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, it is meant, referring to mothsofborneo, in Diagnosis just given it compares. LC analysis underside. The underside PC also differs in these species, but not so clearly. In addition, there is also noted that rafflesii prefers mostly lowland and viridiluteata - alpine forest.

06.11.2014 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Funny blooper found the Japanese, with respect to this type: "Range: Borneo
Endemic, frequent in upper montane "
: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/02_ARCTIINAE/03_Arctiinae/03_Areas/Areas%20galactina/Areas%20galactina.htm
Oh, I do not say that this is endemic of Borneo :)

06.11.2014 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thank you for what drew my attention to an absolute blunder. Judging from the underside of the rear wings, it really Tanaorhinus viridiluteata. Differences clearly shows the underside of the Japanese on their website:
Tanaorhinus rafflesii:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/13_Tanaorhinus/Tanaorhinus%20rafflesii/Tanaorhinus%20rafflesii.htm
Tanaorhinus viridiluteata:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/13_Tanaorhinus/Tanaorhinus%20viridiluteata/Tanaorhinus%20viridiluteata.htm
Please transfer photos Tanaorhinus viridiluteata

06.11.2014 23:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio rumanzovia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

06.11.2014 23:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

06.11.2014 23:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea lateritia / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

06.11.2014 23:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea lateritia / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

06.11.2014 23:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

06.11.2014 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very shabby instance, agree, is more like a Pyrausta aurata, but there are options. I offer until inaccurate.

06.11.2014 19:29, Basil Sergienko:

I guess you're right

06.11.2014 18:24, Alex Lender:

Pyrausta aurata ?

06.11.2014 18:22, Alex Lender:

Anacampsis blattariella ?

06.11.2014 18:21, Alexander Belousov:

Vasily Sergienko has defined it as - Resapamea hedeni, and to me it is still seen as - Apamea lateritia. With my little experience different prividitsya can see for yourself where to send it.

06.11.2014 17:29, Alex Dumchus:

Troides, need back

06.11.2014 17:28, Alex Dumchus:

Some Parides -mimoides, need top

06.11.2014 17:27, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio rumanzovia, female

06.11.2014 17:26, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio rumanzovia, Right Papilio thoas

06.11.2014 16:07, Irina Nikulina:

Why not viridiluteata? On what grounds do you it has identified as rafflesii? I not disputed, I just want to clarify. Today, there is no way to understand in detail, but I know that mothsofborneo differences between these two kinds of good indicated in the Diagnosis.

06.11.2014 15:18, Olga Titova:

I lived in the area 3 years. And what kind of tree on which a butterfly?

06.11.2014 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course, why I wrote the comments regarding these two kinds :)
They do "like two drops of water 'and geography is very helpful in this case to put the point: there is China, but here Peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo :) I, just from Peninsular Malaysia is now full of material. Label true 100% (caught my good friend).

06.11.2014 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, in the family for at least 11 species, all very similar, it is necessary to carefully define. http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=96868

06.11.2014 14:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not to be confused with a similar appearance, the Chinese view:Tanaorhinus reciprocata:)
Forms very significantly different in geography, which can be seen here:
http://www.nic.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/geometrinae/tanaorhinus/
Notice a significant gap areas.
Soglasngo the reduced reference is no longer synonymous. It should be on site to deal with synonyms (synonyms are in each other).

06.11.2014 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo eurilochus / Confidently identified / Olga Titova.

06.11.2014 13:58, Peter Khramov:

Well, yes, do not zabyvaaem that on our website you can watch the Old by regions out of the blue in a more comfortable manner and without jumps books. For example, to Sakhalin: http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?rgs[]=38

06.11.2014 13:41, Yuri Semejkin:

On the 2nd River, opposite the market. Russian 17.

06.11.2014 13:38, Olga Titova:

Caligo eurilochus (Cramer, [1775]) Where Vladivostok these beauties?

06.11.2014 13:15, Olga Titova:

The genus Caligo. Perhaps, Caligo memnon.

06.11.2014 13:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is possible that the proposed Dmitry option has the right to be. Given the variability of the species and the fact that it forms several subspecies: http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Chamaelimnas_briola_a.htm, I agree with Dmitry and advocate for the transfer to theChamaelimnas briola:)

06.11.2014 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Olga Titova.

06.11.2014 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

06.11.2014 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2014 12:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.11.2014 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2014 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2014 10:32, Olga Titova:

Twin white spots say it Acronicta rumicis strelchatka oxalic or am I wrong?

06.11.2014 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Olga, if true, all the determinants of DV are on the same site, and the blue of the directory there should be more. :)
http://ashipunov.info/shipunov/school/sch-ru.htm

06.11.2014 9:33, Olga Titova:

Shamil and Basil, many thanks. Downloaded guide Sineva indeed present n. moth in our region. So it is possible to start new issues, new discoveries. A guide to the Far East who can throw?

06.11.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sinev catalog in a format djvu put here: https://yadi.sk/d/XqyHuBAccX7Wd
Program - viewer for this format can be downloaded here: http://windjview.sourceforge.net/ru/
Fifth volume to the insects DV I, unfortunately not (

06.11.2014 7:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Olga, Sinev only in book form =)
Lymantria dispar in the region 38 (Sakhalin) on Sinev present.

06.11.2014 5:13, Olga Titova:

I read that in the Primorye Territory, too, periodic outbreaks of gypsy moth and newspapers cry about his importation. Perhaps and Sakhalin. Friends, tell me, who have an electronic version to the insects of the Russian Far East is 5 and the catalog of Lepidoptera (Lepidoptera) of Russia. Ed. SY Sinev. St. Petersburg .; M.: Association of Scientific Publications KMK 2008.

05.11.2014 17:19, Peter Khramov:

Even the exchange of relevant material users to store equipment. Q as a material only.

05.11.2014 17:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idea leuconoe / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.11.2014 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idea leuconoe / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.11.2014 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

He lives with you. :) Probably as elsewhere periodically gives mass flashes and start talking about the importation. They brought it to North America. :)

05.11.2014 16:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sideridis kitti / Andrej Makara Sideridis reticulata / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.11.2014 15:40, Alex Dumchus:

We are waiting for the dry material. Can be relevant exchanges of dry material?

05.11.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio thoas / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.11.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio thoas / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.11.2014 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.11.2014 14:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Morpho helenor / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

05.11.2014 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, please indicate the full name latynskoe, if not more difficult :), and even better in "dog." It will be easier to bear. :)

05.11.2014 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Male Imago.

05.11.2014 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Morpho helenor.

05.11.2014 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus.

05.11.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Morpho helenor / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

05.11.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Not identified.

05.11.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia biblis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.11.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia biblis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

05.11.2014 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siproeta stelenes / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.11.2014 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Morpho helenor / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

05.11.2014 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parthenos sylvia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.11.2014 14:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus chrysippus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.11.2014 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus chrysippus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.11.2014 14:01, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

05.11.2014 14:01, Alex Dumchus:

Also, like a satin back - here the front nerazvernulis

05.11.2014 14:00, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

05.11.2014 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Danaus chrysippus

05.11.2014 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Danaus chrysippus

05.11.2014 2:08, Peter Khramov:

Basil, no, it was born more than since the last meeting: -) But thanks anyway.

05.11.2014 1:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, as I understand, it was born in part on the results of the last meeting? Congratulations on getting started :) Good luck in this case.

05.11.2014 1:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thank you. I confess: there, I just did not look, but worth it. Just a few distinct thence pictures ... Tomorrow I will be with a human Internet and will observe is given necessarily arguments. I think, and then put an end :)

05.11.2014 0:23, Irina Nikulina:

I decided to still see what's "mystique" was. All four species are on mothsofborneo, there is enough detail their differences. In bipardaria narrow and dark gray sling, monopardaria bipardaria very similar to, but the main color is paler still have a sling.In runctipardaria altipardaria sling and paler and wider, but runctipardaria differs from the other 3 types of the largest black points (this can be seen on photos from the web - lepbarcoding.org). Butterfly on a photo, in my opinion, is most suitable for habit, as you say, toBorbacha altipardaria(also inaccurately, of course)

05.11.2014 0:13, Peter Khramov:

New Entomological Shop - Naturaliste.ru


Specials on the way.
But for the time being:

This topical delivery from Russia - it already is.
This is relevant payment cards, electronic money, through the terminals - it is.
This actual dry material - it should appear during the week (otpishu optional).This relevant boxes - there are quite a lot of 23h30 and 30x40 available directly right now.
This crucial issue of delivery - is now possible to estimate the prices of options / dates and locations of items for ex 4500 settlements of the Russian Federation directly on the site.

ZY To enter the ACC can be used from the Lepidoptera login or Lepstora, if you have them.Or just zaregatsya as a new user.

04.11.2014 23:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucomelas juvenilis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.11.2014 23:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antigius butleri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.11.2014 23:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Artopoetes pryeri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.11.2014 23:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sericinus montela / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.11.2014 23:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bibasis aquilina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.11.2014 23:22, Irina Nikulina:

Why synonymous? Maybe I missed something in the discussion? Holloway 4 species described in 1982 "Holloway (1982) revalidated genus Borbacha Moore and described four new species from Borneo ie, monopardaria, bipardaria, punctipardaria and altipardaria" Here in detail about the kind of Borbacha, since 1887 http: //shodhganga.inflibnet. ac.in/bitstream/10603/2894/11/11_chapter%204.pdf

04.11.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Or are synonyms, or different kinds? Mysterious butterfly for me, as well as the author of the first description .... Maybe you can somehow clarify the situation?

04.11.2014 20:32, Irina Nikulina:

Leucomelas juvenilis

04.11.2014 20:31, Irina Nikulina:

Antigius butleri

04.11.2014 20:31, Irina Nikulina:

Artopoetes pryeri

04.11.2014 20:31, Irina Nikulina:

Sericinus montela

04.11.2014 20:30, Irina Nikulina:

Bibasis aquilina

04.11.2014 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I'm talking about people in general. Well you something such tubes do not take before, you have to be a claim ...

04.11.2014 17:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determined by many, but it is necessary to have a great experience and great visual material, I am for it just yet do not undertake, a very large amount of information necessary to understand that normally would identify them.

04.11.2014 16:50, Shamil Murtazin:

without cooking them [Euxoa] defined at all? (for the future)

04.11.2014 16:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Defective, simply. The day before yesterday it looked, though there was no time to write. Now his exotic Pts. a lot of. And it must be generally determined and put on the site :)

04.11.2014 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Attacus atlas / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

04.11.2014 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.11.2014 15:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Beauty will save the world. :)

04.11.2014 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hoplodrina ambigua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.11.2014 15:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

It Euxoa

04.11.2014 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thalpophila matura / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.11.2014 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Triodia sylvina / Confidently identified / Male / Shamil Murtazin.

04.11.2014 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Triodia sylvina / Confidently identified / Female / Shamil Murtazin.

04.11.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male. If this is it. On the phone I can not check.

04.11.2014 15:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

female

04.11.2014 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

04.11.2014 12:42, Shamil Murtazin:

tooTriodia sylvina?

04.11.2014 12:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Triodia sylvina? (near)

04.11.2014 10:11, Alex Dumchus:

Female M.helenor without the top of the left wing

04.11.2014 0:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Reviews seem that took over did ...

03.11.2014 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Well, a couple of pieces of a tube, and so I send you. And you comment on saytik Throw, and that takes people to take, and yet something does not see about these models.

03.11.2014 22:47, Shamil Murtazin:

Dimensions box look.
The traps are waiting, with the season :)
Yes, a couple of pieces, you should try to take the microtubes. Silicones - Well, they are different.

03.11.2014 22:22, Peter Khramov:

Video will implement it through SYNC with youtube.

03.11.2014 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Traps good, but not much. We met just recently with Vasily and Alexei, looking to improve the need for a complete buzz. It turns out there is: -)
What's the box of the same size?
If volatile substances, you probably need microtubes with silicone sealant. For example, here are: http://naturaliste.ru/catalog/1867.At the cheaper options also cover there, but these are more suitable for volatile (if kanesh your silicone material does not corrode).
About boutiques in the new topic will tell. Who is brief remark to Alexander, and who had previously interested about transport to the CIS - from under Naturalist deliver almost anywhere in the world.And who dry material needed - during the week will be on the Naturaliste and material. A butterfly has synchronized to try Lepidopteroy.ru.

03.11.2014 21:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, as there is a trap? :)))
For a box with a glass of the same size, respectively.
And some small tubes needed to highly volatile substances can not evaporate through the cover. Advise please!
What is the reason "rebranding" store? ..

03.11.2014 21:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, I poured on youtube and then link to the signed photo in the comment field.

03.11.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Holloway, in a word ....

03.11.2014 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This has not yet dared to put into precise: a lot of unknown to them. Alternatively MoreBorbacha altipardaria???

03.11.2014 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pingasa lariariastill be on my?
Later, several kinds of Pingasa loaded (will be in neoprene. Set). There is possibility to define?

03.11.2014 18:25, Basil Sergienko:

I'm sorry, but you have another butterfly, neraspravlennye here like on the link provided

03.11.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I, exactly the same, "fly" 3 copies. and all look the same: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.7_Geometrinae/2169Pingasa/2172Pingasa_ruginaria/Pingasa_ruginaria.htm
In general, a lot of moths Malay received this time: hope posmosch :)

03.11.2014 18:03, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

03.11.2014 18:02, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

03.11.2014 17:53, Basil Sergienko:

There are so easily determined such difficult group, it seems to me, it does not add to the authority's website. Since there are not all true, I think, I decided to see the available Old. In total, according to the valid sheet of taxa (for 2007), in-kind Pingasa 45 species and subspecies of a pile, the series is very similar to my mind straightened butterfly is a different kind.I would suggest that this fly rubicunda, if there is still something similar does not fly.

03.11.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Parthenos sylvia

03.11.2014 17:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Siproeta stelenes ?

03.11.2014 17:07, Alex Dumchus:

Something of Amatuzy - Zeuxidia what? An interesting butterfly.

03.11.2014 16:58, Alex Dumchus:

I think Hebomoia glaucippe? at the top is needed

03.11.2014 16:34, Yuri Semejkin:

It is possible and show photos. I use sometimes dried samples. but again, only for shooting. Straightened until it turns bad, so sometimes give entomologists, such as this one http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31477 They also need to update the samples.

03.11.2014 16:30, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. And you can throw a small video of butterflies - 30-35 MB?

03.11.2014 16:25, Alex Dumchus:

It's a pity! Your edge of so many interesting things.

03.11.2014 16:22, Yuri Semejkin:

No, Alexander, collecting I do not do, just pictures.

03.11.2014 16:17, Alex Dumchus:

Like it, ssp gordida - they are bred in the Philippines.

03.11.2014 16:15, Alex Dumchus:

Yuri. I do not blame them. I myself was a kettle for some time. Look at my office a couple of years ago. For me, your butterfly Far East, especially Saturn and revelers -Large exotic. You, by the way do not collect? If da send me an email. I have many such dobra- in the sense of the tropics.

03.11.2014 16:11, Yuri Semejkin:

I looked underside helenor /lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34776. We have a completely different butterflies!

03.11.2014 16:08, Alex Dumchus:

Large black bands on the back. From my acquaintance is T.criton, oblongomaculatus or most likely a hybrid of Crito Helena. They are often bred for kr.mere in Indonesia and the Philippines.

03.11.2014 16:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Alexander!

03.11.2014 16:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! I see these tropical 2nd time in my life, you are too much is not osuzhdayte.Tem least assert the existence of the third option, I do not presume. I took your infu noted.

03.11.2014 15:59, Alex Dumchus:

Cethosia biblis

03.11.2014 15:59, Alex Dumchus:

Cethosia biblis

03.11.2014 15:57, Alex Dumchus:

It M.helenor carillensis, one often planted in gardens Butterfly

03.11.2014 15:52, Alex Dumchus:

Yuri. Look at the top and underside of said I caligo and morphine - even helenor and Achilles. I am still in good health and able to distinguish morphs from Kaliga, the more catch and the other in nature. If, as you claim, it is the top and underside of one individual, it is something new in science. Grab this butterfly and expose on E-Bay - you become a millionaire.In any case, now on display for you photos of one of the subspecies M.helenor. But in general, let's wait for confirmation Dmitry.

03.11.2014 14:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! In the house at the time of shooting flying two differences depicted in this picture. Here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34769, definitely the top of the individual that right. I tried to remove the top and underside of each individual, but has not yet happened, basically sit with folded wings, sometimes only for a few seconds, straightening them.It seems necessary to remove it in the future, if the reset, only the top with underside.

03.11.2014 12:25, Alex Dumchus:

And whether you have a horse? The underside Caligo quite similar. Look underside brasiliensis, eurilochus, oileus ...

03.11.2014 12:19, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho helenor female

03.11.2014 9:59, Yuri Semejkin:

This one, like the same http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33345 right here, that is, Caligo memnon

03.11.2014 9:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Here verhCaligo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34769

03.11.2014 9:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes like not confused, like all the same here. Well, I throw off temporary files Caligo (top), so good-quality (stripped). In the future, I will try as much as possible to reshoot the top and underside.

03.11.2014 8:35, Alex Dumchus:

The female Troides, likely helena, to look back.

03.11.2014 8:29, Alex Dumchus:

On the left is likely C.atreus, at Memnon is not so bright light strip on the rear fenders. The right is more like C.brasiliensis, but need a top.

03.11.2014 8:24, Alex Dumchus:

In my opinion the top Morpho helenor. And in order to determine the need Caligo top.

03.11.2014 8:21, Alex Dumchus: This species is identified correctly.

03.11.2014 7:23, Yuri Semejkin:

The picture shows the top and underside of one species. Caligo memnos?

03.11.2014 5:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Caligo memnon ?

03.11.2014 3:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Idea leuconoe ?

03.11.2014 2:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio memnon Linnaeus, 1758? Buck

02.11.2014 23:58, Shamil Murtazin:

separate please! =)

02.11.2014 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catarhoe permixtaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

02.11.2014 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Idaea pallidata / Confidently identified / Female / Basil Sergienko.

02.11.2014 21:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Idaea pallidata / Confidently identified / Female / Basil Sergienko.

02.11.2014 21:01, Alex Dumchus:

Put in thoas, its commercial sites sell in batches, thus diluted, but others do not (said and went to the kitchen to drink chekushku :)

02.11.2014 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, here it is, too, in all guises: http://en.butterflycorner.net/Papilio-thoas-King-Swallowtail.466.0.html
As they say: "Without the bottle does not understand" :)

02.11.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I determined at this link:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/02_Ennominae/012_Fascellina/Fascellina%20albicordis/Fascellina%20albicordis.htm
In general, the gap with the picture type in Google a huge ...

02.11.2014 20:15, Alex Dumchus:

P.thoas thoas from Brazil (where many wild monkeys :) http://swallowtails.net/

02.11.2014 20:07, Alex Dumchus:

I myself do not understand, my Thoas no yellow sash around the edge of the front wings. Here it is necessary to understand in a serious way. You Basil himself defined Thoas, shot me in the garden of butterflies (see photo 12 109). MB in general, it is time to reconsider the earlier definitions? Just thoas - commercial butterfly and her increasingly helpless, and all look the same thoas, chrespontes, paeon.Just thoas more brighter and more beautiful :))

02.11.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What is my fault?

02.11.2014 18:27, Alex Dumchus:

Hypolimnas bolina

02.11.2014 18:26, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio thoas

02.11.2014 18:26, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio thoas

02.11.2014 18:25, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio demoleus

02.11.2014 18:25, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio demoleus

02.11.2014 18:24, Alex Dumchus:

Attacus atlas

02.11.2014 18:22, Alex Dumchus:

Hypolimnas bolina

02.11.2014 18:20, Alex Dumchus:

That's right, the female

02.11.2014 12:49, Basil Sergienko:

But the butterfly is the same

02.11.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio cresphontes

02.11.2014 12:33, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio demoleus

02.11.2014 12:20, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio memnon (P. m. lowii Druce, 1873) ?

02.11.2014 12:14, Irina Nikulina:

Basil, perhaps you have in mind your definition here is another photo - http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32122?

02.11.2014 12:06, Basil Sergienko:

This Catarhoe already determined, why is she here?

02.11.2014 12:04, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea pallidata-female

02.11.2014 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.11.2014 9:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zygaena minos Zygaena viciae.

02.11.2014 9:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.11.2014 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

01.11.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena viciaereason stated here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34720

01.11.2014 17:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that's another photo definitively clarified that with minos I was wrong a year ago.
Now you can carry it in a group photo to viciae :)

01.11.2014 17:06, Irina Nikulina:

Thank Basil for a reference to the collection, I agree with all - viciae it (someone will be interested - the form confusa on the 18th page)

01.11.2014 16:19, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena viciae this, lonicerae another form of whiskers.

01.11.2014 15:37, Basil Sergienko:

In viciae confusa is a form very similar to, if you have time you can see a collection of Witt
http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/vk/dysplay_virt_koll.pl?land=en

01.11.2014 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not just "give", and it is necessary to understand :) What I see in this specific image, wrote the following: a modified strongly enough: Z. viciae? But maybeZygaena lonicerae(too atypical), but not minos (on that photo, I probably was wrong a year ago). Two options: Z. viciae or Z. lonicerae: it is necessary to reason someone else :)

01.11.2014 12:02, Irina Nikulina:

Basil yesterday because of problems with an Internet did not have time to bind to the group, do it now and read a dialogue asking barred one year under the photo the same individual. Then you're confident enough to write that "except minos such a blur, and there should not be anyone in the Kaluga region."I returned to it more than once a year, were some doubts and decided to add a photo. Let's deal)

01.11.2014 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There was my opportunity to restore geography: learned that caught one of my very good friend (Krasnoyarsk kr. "Stopudovo"). So that it will be possible shortly. I hate to lose the label (

01.11.2014 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tend some reason (probably based on the variability) toZygaena viciaeChoice 8, a relatively small and that, in my opinion is quite suitable.

31.10.2014 21:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

comrades long concealed and still hide his exact location, in order to sell more expensive.

31.10.2014 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Telorta divergens / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.10.2014 14:07, Alex Dumchus:

Recently passed the announcement of Parnassius davydovi and foreign sites. And what's wrong with him? I just do not know ....

31.10.2014 11:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And Phoebus is now sort of like corybas. Here is an interesting sort of thing.

31.10.2014 11:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Skipper in the sense tolstogolovka? - Nonsense

31.10.2014 11:54, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Dmitry, the word "problem" is guarded, but was not aware of) the evening will study in more detail.

31.10.2014 11:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In general instance of Phoebus (for which was described species) proved Ariadne. It turns out the species name Phoebus should take the form Ariadne

31.10.2014 11:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Irina, I do not mean it! Brief problem can then view
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=214757&view=findpost&p=1438978

31.10.2014 11:44, Peter Khramov:

The author she Skipper, if I remember correctly.

31.10.2014 11:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitriy. govoit that are synonymous. Correctly?

31.10.2014 11:31, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitry, ariadne on Sinev in the Krasnoyarsk Territory is not marked, although the south is bordered by the edge resp.Tyva and Altai, and there have Ariadne. Location unknown fishing, Kr. Territory big) but I did not consider ariadne even so - though weak, but typical ariadne jagged edges bands on HCC do not have this copy.

31.10.2014 10:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And clearly moth mustache and belly are raised, as in riodenid. I'm for Chamaelimnas briola

31.10.2014 10:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Catarhoe permixtaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

31.10.2014 10:00, Basil Sergienko:

Catarhoe permixtaria

31.10.2014 9:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia subfuscata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

31.10.2014 9:33, Basil Sergienko:

subfuscata

31.10.2014 9:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eupterote muluana like.

31.10.2014 8:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well, not on the night she was sitting !!! Riodenida Chamaelimnas briola it.

31.10.2014 8:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is not the hour riodenida whether some?

31.10.2014 8:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And what about the situation with problem Parnassius phoebus-Parnassius ariadne?

31.10.2014 8:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Telorta divergens (Butler, 1879). Define: Kononenko VS BPI FEB RAS.

31.10.2014 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why subspecies grow overseas, if in your country there are two subspecies? And Bolivia is not a country. But that label intentionally kosyachat- is a disease of all merchants. Especially Russian (remember Parnassius davydovi and Colias erschoffi)

31.10.2014 1:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Ivan! If you want to go tell one from the other, you see the top of the wings. The very name uglokrylnitsa apparently given by the word of the corners. So uglokrylnitsy Polygonia c-album more rounded corners of the wings. In a-aureum, they are more acute. Compare pictures, as recommended.
Another difference.In uglokrylnitsy c white on the hind wings round yellow spots, while the gold-uglokrylnitsy with rear wings these spots golubenky, moving to the front wings. The spots in most cases are clearly visible. Look, once is enough to compare these two types, and remember

31.10.2014 0:09, Irina Nikulina:

Peter did not become a new topic to create, as a problem similar to the above - listalke viewing photos in a species does not work either. Ie if they are more than one page (on a page when viewing form in a large amount), it is possible to view only the 1st page. In the transition to the 2nd throws full gallery.Look, for example, Polyommatus icarus, or any other, where a lot of photos.

30.10.2014 23:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.10.2014 23:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parnassius phoebus / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

30.10.2014 23:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius phoebus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.10.2014 23:46, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius phoebus

30.10.2014 23:21, Irina Nikulina:

Species-aureum (c-gold), because With shaped as letters on the underside do not really white, and yellow (gold). It is really brilliant! In the photo, especially taken with a flash, it is not very noticeable, but it is alive with contrast and white can be seen well. It was one of my first questions when I saw her alive DV - and different from ours with white? :)) Explained.And another striking characteristic difference - at the outer edge of the golden PCs with large and sharp tooth, especially in the form pryeri. This is clearly seen on any photo from our gallery)

30.10.2014 22:21, Shamil Murtazin:

poisonous probably :)

30.10.2014 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Interesting goose. Reminds me of the appearance of some centipede centipede (centipede, drupe, etc.): https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Губоногие
What did not invent nature :)

30.10.2014 20:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

At the same time said, rarely :)

30.10.2014 20:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

In c-aureum front of the wings, in the dark areas of the picture, on the edge of the wings, "metal" scales, from here and probably the species name.

30.10.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It goes without appearance and spread :)
Polygonia c-albumlives almost on the whole territory of Russia.
Polygonia c-aureumfound only three regions of Russia as well: # 36. Mid-Amur; # 37. Nizhne-Amur; # 40. Seashore.

30.10.2014 19:39, Ivan Pristrem:

Prompt please, what is the difference and c-album c-aureum?

30.10.2014 19:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx mucronata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

30.10.2014 19:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, with a yellow head, I agree, but there dofiga species, and there is no picture :(

30.10.2014 19:19, Basil Sergienko:

Scotopteryx, judging by the state of copies. at the end of May, with high probability we can assume-mucronata, luridata at this time just beginning to fly

30.10.2014 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Head yellow kind, only Atyria. Sam searched: you can break the head.

30.10.2014 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are three kind of similar, and it is this kind also can not find :(

30.10.2014 19:02, Alex Dumchus:

Maybe they are simply stupid to grow, how to grow in Tae lot of butterflies?

30.10.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very often, many fishers do not want to advertise any data other than the country (gone is wafting) (
Soon he will put this material on Borneo and Laos. I do not know why, maybe the point of fear or something else? Commerce is a delicate matter :)

30.10.2014 18:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I watched. like Bolivia. the rest - ???

30.10.2014 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diphthera festiva / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.10.2014 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diphthera festiva / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.10.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Diphthera festiva

30.10.2014 17:47, Alex Dumchus:

I sent. It ssp helenor. But he nakalyakal in geography - is difficult to decipher - mb Brazil?

30.10.2014 15:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

See subspecies - theodorus Fruhstorfer, 1907
pindarus Fruhstorfer, 1910

30.10.2014 15:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Send, but the interpreter of my weak)))

30.10.2014 14:53, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitry, you can send mail to photo labels? There's the devil himself will not understand. Perhaps the doctor wrote :)

30.10.2014 14:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nominativ- north of South America. In Bolivia, it can not be. So it's not ssp helenor

30.10.2014 14:03, Alex Dumchus:

Basil, for you gave underside M.helenor, M.partoclos = M.achilles

30.10.2014 14:02, Alex Dumchus:

ssp helenor

30.10.2014 14:01, Alex Dumchus:

ssp lacommei

30.10.2014 11:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It seems like apart from Morpho achilles vitrea, anyone any more like

30.10.2014 10:32, Alex Dumchus:

Put in inaccurate because Achilles at all wings with black edges, which is not seen, it's probably M.helenor - it is most prevalent.

30.10.2014 10:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Let us not look extra scary. photos clearly Inope. Efetov not argue with that. Rhagades pruni disappear totally. :) Yuri, or when not focusing on the timing of the summer in Europe. This is mutually exclusive value. :) Apart from the genitals, the difference in the amount and timing of the summer in the Far East. both matches Inope heterogyna.Efetov highly values ​​its reputation, and if there is an error fozmozhnost, albeit minimal, that it should be avoided. I am sure that he cooks all deytvitelno Inope, before you say what kind. Efetov can cook dozens of butterflies of the same type from the same point and with the same date that would have satisfied monotypic series :)

30.10.2014 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Top-would not hurt, of course), I most of all she looked somehow ....

30.10.2014 10:06, Alex Dumchus:

Basil, I would not assert so categorically. Many subspecies M.helenor, such ssp lacommei, and M. partoclus have the same underside.

30.10.2014 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Morpho achilles

29.10.2014 23:44, Irina Nikulina:

Decide please, where to send the photo. If prof. K.A.Efetov wrote that you must study the genital apparatus, means the flight of time to select the type of Inope enough and determination may not be accurate.With regard Rhagades pruni, apparently, have to explain why the first comment has excluded it from consideration: this species - are not endemic to the Far East, and is widely distributed, it is found in 19 regions of Russia and throughout Europe, so the description and the pictures of his are not only in Keys to insects of the Far East, but also in others.East Kach, both our and foreign, indicating the top on metal shiny side of the chest and base of the wings. The Dutch Rhagades pruni generally called bruine metaalvlinder - brown metal butterfly.

29.10.2014 23:42, Peter Khramov:

The author has cool photos, which is a sign about the "contaminating mulberries Hex," and as the horror stories - an example of a real period that gave the dude for pollution is the most. 8 months or so, I do not remember uzho.

29.10.2014 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, not Staphylus ceos. He is the North American: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Staphylus_ceos_a.htm
Most Staphylus chlora: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Staphylus_chlora_a.htm?
In general, there are a lot of species and a great chance at it and remain in indefinite (

29.10.2014 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's right: It's just like us ... People are the same everywhere (
No, the bottles are empty, etc. for a raise, put in the trunk (if driving) and take out the trash for the near .... As the saying goes: "After us the deluge" ((

29.10.2014 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

And this as we share? it shall be for the background :) or a duplicate, if necessary to help Peter. :)

29.10.2014 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycaena violacea / Shirley Sekarajasingham Celastrina ladon / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.10.2014 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I searched myself, to be honest ..... Let as though to be kind.

29.10.2014 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, there is 70 kinds of pieces, there are similar, but many can not find the image, it would be desirable for specific, but that does not seem to find.

29.10.2014 21:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gorgopas trochilus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.10.2014 21:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gorgopas trochilus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.10.2014 21:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Gorgopas trochilus / Confidently identified / Male & female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.10.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just prior to the tribe: Geometridae> Sterrhinae> Cyllopodini. Probably born Atyria?
Next pass, alas (

29.10.2014 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adelpha sp. Adelpha alala?

29.10.2014 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gorgopas trochilus
http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/gorgopas_trochilus.htm

29.10.2014 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gorgopas trochilus

29.10.2014 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gorgopas trochilus

29.10.2014 16:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Fixed

29.10.2014 16:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For discussions)))

29.10.2014 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How can both be "Imago Female" ? It is necessary to fix :)

29.10.2014 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia icarioides / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.10.2014 13:58, Peter Khramov:

Then one must be kind to add to ...

29.10.2014 13:57, Peter Khramov:

It and neighboring assumptions - for inaccurate or is in indefinite leave?

29.10.2014 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, cook something wingless females (at least ours) and it is not necessary: ​​they are all good in appearance vary))) And if cooking is then a matter of her and stabbing is not necessary, and a wool. You're right: it was like a beetle. Pinned her to the pin: in time all the seams will die .... On the way and cruise mount (micro).A matter of taste, in short)))

29.10.2014 9:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Butterfly on a plate :))), it is only zhuchist could think :)))
perhaps aesthetically, but for butterflies than usual and then if cooking darkness.

29.10.2014 9:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Well yes. In another something and nothing. Thanks Basil!

29.10.2014 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Erateina sp. (Geometridae: Larentiinae)
Does not it: http://caterpillars.unr.edu/lsacat/ecuador/species/geometridae/Erat_drucei/Erat_drucei.htm?

29.10.2014 8:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.10.2014 8:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.10.2014 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.10.2014 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.10.2014 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

29.10.2014 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.10.2014 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.10.2014 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adelpha sp.

29.10.2014 7:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spread legs and everything. Exactly :)
Wingless females is best to stick to a strip of heavy paper / cardboard or the so-called plate: http://lepstore.ru/catalog/s18, rather than just stabbing in the body: it is necessary to pin prick on the plate.
Once, long ago, I had exhibited similar, from different families: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2959 and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26786 (other types, but essentially it does not change) :)

29.10.2014 5:19, Yuri Semejkin:

So everything Ok. Good. I took it today, it seems that Ms. individual of the lost yesterday (fell into the leaves). I found today on the same spot, on zabore.Reshil on raspravilu. But it is also without wings. Zamora-turns on a pin-spread legs and all, is it? Oh, sorry for the naive, but for the first time took the wingless.

28.10.2014 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

28.10.2014 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

28.10.2014 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

28.10.2014 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

28.10.2014 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

28.10.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male and female

28.10.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

28.10.2014 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, did not pay attention, that in determining the comments are not made. This kind of wingless females always. It is good that indicated that males (winged always) also flew. Doubts have disappeared. :))

28.10.2014 14:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Bhutanitis yulongensis / Alex Dumchus Bhutanitis mansfieldi / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2014 13:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Bhutanitis yulongensis / Alex Dumchus Bhutanitis mansfieldi / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2014 13:47, Yuri Semejkin:

I've seen pictures Rhagades pruni. All that is characteristic of him, I had already written. Er, everything that you reconsider, maybe true, but it is not reflected in the Far East to the insects. It would be so easy, there would be no issue. And Efetov easily gave a definition, it is still the best in the former Soviet Union zygaenidae.
Determination of the time dёta? - I'll say it again.We have the same time volley Rhagades pruni July-August, and the same for example Germany has pictures of 20th of May. So that everything is relative.

28.10.2014 12:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

It Celastrina ladon (Cramer, [1780]), but in any case, not Lycaena violacea. someone, something messed up synonyms.

28.10.2014 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Peter, a photo of the same species, but the taxonomic decision is clearly not right, it's different tribes and Lycaenini Tribus Polyommatini photos from the last.

28.10.2014 12:28, Peter Khramov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23144 m? ..

28.10.2014 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.10.2014 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.10.2014 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.10.2014 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Alsophila japonensis / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.10.2014 12:07, Yuri Semejkin:

I think so too. It's cold today, and apparently on the way it looks. One confused, sat next to others. Alsophila japonensis, with outstretched wings, which somehow did not take a look.
Maybe inaccurate? On occasion I will ask Belyaev.

28.10.2014 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia satyrata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

28.10.2014 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vida catalog no need to add or there's some intrigue? :)
http://butterfliesofamerica.com/celastrina_ladon_live2.htm

28.10.2014 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here in the foregroundCelastrina ladon, and in the backgroundAricia icarioides

28.10.2014 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aricia icarioidessee it or do not it?

28.10.2014 11:11, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, hurry Pts., So briefly - at Rhagades pruni completely different color wings with metal. I shine, I reviewed a lot of them before in March to send a file to pruni K.A.Efetovu confirmation http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3803. With regard to the flight of time, I think that just in this case, it can serve as a defining feature of the two types of genital. My entomologich.knowledge and experience is not enough to judge the possibility of such, almost monthly, shear maerens. As recently discussed genital types of Diarsia, Vasily Sergienko is based on the time of flight of proposed not to remove several. Photos of accurate. There could solve specialists.

28.10.2014 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Of the two prelozhenie, I choose Speyeria coronis.

28.10.2014 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Speyeria coronis / Tentatively identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

28.10.2014 10:52, Basil Sergienko:

I think, satyrata

28.10.2014 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alsophila, likely japonensis))

28.10.2014 8:40, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. Put in mansfieldi, although descriptions and the same name as two different subspecies of species need to be sorted out.

28.10.2014 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nyctemera kinibalina Utetheisa abraxoides.

28.10.2014 8:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera kinibalina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.10.2014 8:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Utetheisa abraxoides, else emerges.

28.10.2014 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, our fireplace looks like :))

28.10.2014 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nothing more to do with it is not necessary - it is in his place.

28.10.2014 5:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, of course, while shooting indicated.
As for the definition of the flight of time, I would not do this accent. This concept extensible and depends on several factors. Er, I think you will not mind that the flight of butterflies (not mass), both before and after the specified time-always the case.Determination of genera and species in this family, in addition to the genitals, in principle, possible, according to the determinant and shins, spurs, which in this case are viewed poorly. Why it is for example not be Rhagades pruni. Flight of time-shifted for a month in July-August, but so what.The color proboscis also do not say anything, he just can not be seen to exclude Rhagades pruni (this species proboscis yellow).
In general il, I think you're right in identifying Inope heterogyna. In any case, the shape, size, color KRL. similar.

28.10.2014 2:03, Irina Nikulina:

Time of flight of these species took just out Zygaenidae, written by KA Efetov. According to these data maerens can not be at the beginning of June. Ure, and the file contains the date of the shooting was to Konstantin?

28.10.2014 1:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Dropped file Efetov KA The answer is. To determine the need to study the genitals.

27.10.2014 23:36, Peter Khramov:

And today - from the United States. On 19 ph 10 unillustrated species. And we can and more, if it is determined.

27.10.2014 22:55, Peter Khramov:

Well so what, another kind of drifts in Odonestis?

27.10.2014 22:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Narope minor / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

27.10.2014 22:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Narope minor / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

27.10.2014 22:15, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Narope minor / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

27.10.2014 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Whose will ?!

27.10.2014 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Where the label? (looking sternly.)

27.10.2014 22:13, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, ready.

27.10.2014 22:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erinnyis obscura / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.10.2014 21:51, Alex Dumchus:

In females Duphia quite thin mustache. Well, still, of course, the author of the artistic efforts of color. Look D.avia and D.fraterna

27.10.2014 21:46, Alex Dumchus:

Perhaps you're right. The label was B. pulchristriata, Saigusa & Lee, 1982. The same is available for yulongensis.
Strange. In one year the same authors described two subspecies

27.10.2014 20:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Marumba sperchius?

27.10.2014 19:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

no, I think it is not even pavlinoglazki

27.10.2014 19:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Bhutanitis mansfieldi (Riley, 1939)

27.10.2014 19:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It Bhutanitis mansfieldi (Riley, 1939)

27.10.2014 18:38, Alex Dumchus:

Dirphia sp

27.10.2014 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Seokia pratti / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris dulcinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia burejana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes subhyalina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 17:27, Irina Nikulina:

Yes I checked - now it works. Thank you, Peter!

27.10.2014 17:23, Peter Khramov:

And, all I understood. Corrected.

27.10.2014 17:21, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes subhyalina

27.10.2014 17:20, Irina Nikulina:

Seokia pratti, male subspecies S.p. eximia (Moltrecht, 1909)

27.10.2014 17:19, Irina Nikulina:

Araschnia burejana

27.10.2014 17:19, Irina Nikulina:

Pieris dulcinea, first generation

27.10.2014 15:49, Alex Dumchus:

Erinnyis obscura socorroensis

27.10.2014 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea nitidata / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.10.2014 14:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Idaea nitidata defined: EA Belyaev BPI FEB RAS

27.10.2014 13:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula pudicaria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.10.2014 13:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula pudicaria defined: EA Belyaev BPI FEB RAS

27.10.2014 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alsophila japonensis / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.10.2014 12:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Alsophila japonensis Identified Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS

27.10.2014 11:45, Irina Nikulina:

I should add that even several. taxa checked (for example, the tribe Depressariini / 40 reg) and asked Yura Semeykina check the same. The result is the same, when switching to the 2nd page 3874 produces a 78-page form.

27.10.2014 11:24, Irina Nikulina:

Well, thank you for the good advice, Peter! How had not guessed, because very friendly terms with the English)) .. Load - and a very different result, much clearer)

27.10.2014 11:10, Irina Nikulina:

Peter tried again, and the result is the same. Checked on 40 region took different taxa - subfamily Tortricinae (184 species, 4 pages, showing only first, then go out in all kinds of galleries), or, for example, the tribe Noctuini (76 species, 2 pages).In any case, check out the 8 Noctuini region, the result - 59 species, 2 pages, the only difference is that when you try to view the second, not thrown the whole gallery, and 2206 species (45 pages).

27.10.2014 11:06, Peter Khramov:

Regarding Google transleyta - does not need to be translated from German into Russian and from German into English, then the result will be much more adequate.

27.10.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.10.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.10.2014 11:02, Peter Khramov:

Dim Sum, a kind of commentary on the page with the source. And I bear. And even better - in the "adding information on the form."

27.10.2014 10:59, Peter Khramov:

In the comments to mean - a source of information about more adequate title and this is the name. Then I bear.

27.10.2014 10:57, Peter Khramov:

Dim, if you mean that there are not foty appeared as illustrations - it is not automatic, and manually. If anything else - give examples. Time corrected, yeah, with perehodm connected.

27.10.2014 10:54, Peter Khramov:

Shamil thought right. Did.

27.10.2014 10:45, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, on the "dogs". It may need to add the button while writing a comment? ..
More to do a tooltip when you hover over the button that explains the syntax and rules for the use of tags. As before in the html tag was acronym.

27.10.2014 10:37, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Quote from Vasily Feoktistov: " Read-would have a height above sea level where you took the picture ...... "
On the second trip clarified the exact place: Gunung Alab mnt., Sabah, Borneo height of 1900 m above sea level on the testimony of the Navigator, the Internet is a place referred to as the height of 2000m above sea level
This information is already unimportant, as I understand, but still ....

27.10.2014 10:20, Peter Khramov:

He checked, I have everything OK. Some primerchik have specific parameters that can be selected to test the ...

27.10.2014 9:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia wanga / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.10.2014 9:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Toksonomicheski agree with Dimitri, but in Asian Russia start from the directory. If correct, the entire page :)

27.10.2014 9:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Erebia wanga ?

27.10.2014 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica lutea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 9:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 9:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 9:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

27.10.2014 9:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Alexander, I did not finish, point out typos it is better to type on the page with a typo, it is easier to correct Peter. :)

27.10.2014 6:09, Alexander Belousov:

"E" - I am not missed, and those who view hammered! http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/22887. He immediately under Dichagyris orientis worth.

27.10.2014 0:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.10.2014 23:58, Irina Nikulina:

author ispod to males is not set, correct, please

26.10.2014 23:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm not to you with complaints - just wondered aloud.

26.10.2014 23:44, Irina Nikulina:

Well this question to a group of authors) I just literally copied that in the end "Catalog ..." Ed. Sinev registered.

26.10.2014 23:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ypthima argus is synonymous Ypthima baldus, what's the erroneous definition?

26.10.2014 23:36, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitri, in Sinev, which we here adhere to the form the explanation - "erroneous definition: baldus auct. (Nec Fabricius, 1775)"

26.10.2014 23:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ypthima baldus (Fabricius, 1775) - the oldest name. I do not understand why the site is argus, and synonyms in baldus

26.10.2014 23:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ypthima baldus (Fabricius, 1775)

26.10.2014 23:24, Irina Nikulina:

Glaucopsyche lycormas

26.10.2014 23:24, Irina Nikulina:

Ypthima argus

26.10.2014 23:23, Irina Nikulina:

Japonica lutea

26.10.2014 23:22, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina ladonides

26.10.2014 23:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Sericinus montela / Confidently identified / Vladimir Mescheryakov.

26.10.2014 23:21, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina ladonides

26.10.2014 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I know: all went through. Variability of course she, wild :)

26.10.2014 23:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Now comes the genus Anomis

26.10.2014 23:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nothing similar, except this kind is not even close.

26.10.2014 23:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.10.2014 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It underside of copies. That was moved in exact. His comments where deleted. It must be in the exact same. Or underside of any doubt? I did not understand anything in it, to be honest.

26.10.2014 23:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rusicada combinans

26.10.2014 22:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.10.2014 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Many types of genital well different other indicators, host plants, habitats, summer time, dimensions, and many others, are often outwardly very similar, but have a highly variable appearance, which is part of individuals of different species crosses. Sergei was not quite right. :)

26.10.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also I agree. Himself put it. Yes pictured by Svetlana it is also determined repeatedly. Apparently, the absence of red spots me and confused (

26.10.2014 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sympis rufibasis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 22:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In this area are more likely to fall than with a red spot. Initially, the brain is also broke.

26.10.2014 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, I agree with this definition.

26.10.2014 22:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is a Sympis rufibasis

26.10.2014 21:58, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you all for a return to the topic! Sash, even when I asked the question in Google lepiforuma to load text, funny translation turned out), I confess, I am not fully comprehended then, today repeated in several translators - and like the clarity came. I think that the statement of Sergei, because I asked a question here (from 8.04), not quite correct.

26.10.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I wonder who is? More I found not even similar. Another mystery, apparently.

26.10.2014 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.10.2014 21:26, Basil Sergienko:

I think it is not necessary to put in inaccurate copies. Ponomarev and Nikulina, florida at this time does not have to fly (at least occasional shabby)

26.10.2014 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

26.10.2014 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

26.10.2014 21:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

26.10.2014 21:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

26.10.2014 21:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

26.10.2014 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the author cites the race in quotes, in the case where he does not agree with the taxonomic decision, but referred to another family for a number of reasons can not. This is basically normal. Because of this, you should not ignore jpmoth.org and mothsofborneo :)
And the saddest thing, this butterfly has no any relation to calefasciens Walker, 1852 to whatever race did not take this taxon.The middle band is not solid, but only 3/4 the outer edge is not clarified, and the lower wing of the other.

26.10.2014 20:33, Alex Dumchus:

The second I got enough from a reputable source, though ....

26.10.2014 20:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

With these red nothing clear

26.10.2014 20:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

/ Cymothoe haynae / Alex Dumchus.

26.10.2014 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dichagyris orientis correct name, and you have written is not correct Dichagyris orintis, missed E. :)))
species is widespread in Europe and Asia is rare.

26.10.2014 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

26.10.2014 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

26.10.2014 19:56, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, female

26.10.2014 19:34, Alexander Belousov:

And what kind of -Dichagyris orintis (Alpheraky, 1882), except here in the internet is not found. Maybe a typo?

26.10.2014 19:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It also Cymothoe haynae, as I understand?

26.10.2014 19:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It also Cymothoe haynae, as I understand?

26.10.2014 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We must all rubi and put in florida inaccurate. Authors of definitions, I think will not be offended :) This is my opinion, of course ....In any case, from "personal piggy bank," while in the eighth flight of the region, for all five species:
Diarsia brunnea: June - August
Diarsia dahlii: July - September
Diarsia florida: June - July
Diarsia mendica: June - August
Diarsia rubi: May - September most "long-playing" of all: flies throughout the season :)
Then by the time the flight of hard to judge. In a region from which the specimens., at least :)
Date is 2007-06-24 Pardon me, confused at the beginning and wrote 5): In June we fly four of five.

26.10.2014 19:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphrissa orbis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphrissa orbis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias drusilla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias drusilla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ganyra josephina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ganyra josephina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema nicippe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema nicippe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema dina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema dina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis argante / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis argante / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Aphrissa godartiana.

26.10.2014 18:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphrissa godartiana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A label where?

26.10.2014 18:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, on the text of lepiforuma in Google translator, translate it, really it's kind genetalnye species, there are indications as to distinguish between the summer and these different types.

26.10.2014 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diarsia rubi / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.10.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, now I reviewed more thoroughly all 5 species is given for the 8th Region (not lepiforume) and bowed to the fact that it is the closest in appearance to theDiarsia rubi: shorter confusion. Here, too, only apparently put an end to the genitals, both with and Amphipoea. And in my opinion they should not be in the exact place.It is necessary to remove all inaccurate or vague. If something can not see, I want to ask other members to join the discus and clarify.

26.10.2014 17:57, Alex Dumchus:

I have a one male with two antennae. It is derived from another source. No different from etogo.Etiketka: Buokoko, RCA, 08, 2012

26.10.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, I wrote to you there, under the same butterfly, why this is so. Endure again and everything will be fine.
Peter, you have a website that has something to do with the clock. In connection with the transfer. Or I do not understand something?

26.10.2014 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry try again. Everything must get to their seats.
This glitch known and occurs when the author works in the LC and modernization at the same time it carries. The authors have the opportunity for an hour to edit the data in the LC (an hour and better to wait after downloading).

26.10.2014 17:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Check all that I am today identified with the Dominican Republic and perenes- not clung to the pages of the form.

26.10.2014 17:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Perhaps you need in this kind of inaccurate.

26.10.2014 17:03, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitri, you're laughing. Out of Africa - accurate label? Somewhere so - about the place, about a month and a year. It then Europeans write svoi- "refined."

26.10.2014 17:00, Alex Dumchus:

no

26.10.2014 16:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A precise label is?

26.10.2014 16:42, Alex Dumchus:

If memory serves, the Alain van Vyve (The Bugmaniac)

26.10.2014 16:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

who?

26.10.2014 16:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

10.26.2014 13:12 is written under the photo. All types with the Dominican Republic, I identified, suffered, but they have not caught on for some reason. Peter, check

26.10.2014 16:18, Alex Dumchus:

When the transfer? I took off her yesterday raspravilki.

26.10.2014 16:16, Alex Dumchus:

Not me.

26.10.2014 15:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Who determined to species?

26.10.2014 15:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And who determined to species?

26.10.2014 15:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Acosmerycoides harterti / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 15:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Acosmerycoides harterti

26.10.2014 15:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pour all that you possess. Rhode big, and there are few photos :)

26.10.2014 15:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Th for crap, I have endured their

26.10.2014 15:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

ispod possible?

26.10.2014 15:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Adelpha epione / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 15:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Adelpha epione / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 15:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia aethiops / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.10.2014 15:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Urbanus dorantes cramptoni

26.10.2014 15:05, Alex Dumchus:

No. I received in July from Vietnam

26.10.2014 15:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Mycalesis anapita / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 14:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Maniola jurtina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.10.2014 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Kirinia roxelana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 14:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieris rapae / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 14:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pieris rapae

26.10.2014 14:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ideopsis gaura / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Then the label is not confused by any chance?

26.10.2014 14:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ideopsis gaura

26.10.2014 14:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba saishiuana / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

26.10.2014 14:29, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. At your request, I pour part of their Cymothoe

26.10.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, you can fix it, even if that line the author wrote only one letter. If it does not say anything, then it is not available to moderation :)

26.10.2014 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

I tried, I could not, but I did not know about it. :)

26.10.2014 14:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhopyge charybdis / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

26.10.2014 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I suggest this is also transferred toPyrrhopyge charybdis

26.10.2014 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I know that, Alexander. For Peter and the reminder :)

26.10.2014 13:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ortilia ithra / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I had 2 options)))

26.10.2014 13:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A. whitei- many consider a hybrid, but it occasionally comes across in SE Asia, and also in India.

26.10.2014 13:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ortilia ithra (Kirby, 1900), in my opinion.

26.10.2014 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Good for you, Dmitry, I was transferred to the responsibility. :)))
And what is legendary A. whitei?

26.10.2014 13:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Athyma selenophora / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.10.2014 13:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Athyma selenophora / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.10.2014 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, for these two photos, to agree with the author and Eugene, it is only suitable for the dissemination of this type and color close to it Pyrrhopyge pelota has a yellow fringe.

26.10.2014 13:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Phoebis argante / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Phoebis argante / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aphrissa godartiana / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aphrissa godartiana / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eurema dina / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eurema dina / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, a little blue. But as we !!!

26.10.2014 13:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eurema nicippe / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eurema nicippe / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

The clear white band is probably stillAthyma selenophora

26.10.2014 13:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

26.10.2014 13:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ganyra josephina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ganyra josephina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias drusilla / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias drusilla / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aphrissa orbis / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aphrissa orbis / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 13:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

26.10.2014 13:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis argante rorata

26.10.2014 13:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Aphrissa godartiana godartiana female

26.10.2014 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhopyge charybdis / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

26.10.2014 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhopyge charybdis / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

26.10.2014 12:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema dina mayobanex

26.10.2014 12:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema nicippe

26.10.2014 12:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ascia monuste eubotea female

26.10.2014 12:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Old Cuban friend Ascia monuste eubotea male

26.10.2014 12:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ganyra josephina

26.10.2014 12:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Appias drusilla boydi

26.10.2014 12:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil finish subspecies can only author, or in this case, Peter. ))

26.10.2014 12:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

subspecies churchi - endemic to the island

26.10.2014 12:41, Alex Dumchus:

Swipe 75 mm.

26.10.2014 12:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Aphrissa orbis browni

26.10.2014 12:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Aphrissa orbis browni

26.10.2014 12:32, Alex Dumchus:

Larger than their Mexican counterparts. Swipe 80 mm.

26.10.2014 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Set up creator type subspecies: Riodina lycisca lysistratus. Burmeister, 1878 . I think it makes sense to add a subspecies in the top line.

26.10.2014 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We got hands poreshat question a month ago. The site is a kind of Parallelia Hübner, 1818: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/30163
View Parallelia calefasciens Walker, 1852 , without the quotes, there are: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=224747 here: http://eol.org / pages / 547241 / overview
And many more where :)
Conclusion: it is necessary to pretend and move. Butterfly long it has been defined as "marinated" in uncertainty.
A mothsofborneo.com leave in solving this issue, "side": there are very large bloat Holloway.
So as not ignore and jpmoth.org, because there is one to one to take the information with mothsofborneo :)
Here is a solution I see. What do you think about this?

26.10.2014 2:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Marvelous are thy works !!! Is the legendary Athyma whitei ??? Or did Athyma selenophora

26.10.2014 2:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypochrosis hyadaria / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 2:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypochrosis hyadaria Guenée, 1857

26.10.2014 2:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxymacaria temeraria / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 1:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oxymacaria temeraria (Swinhoe, 1891)

26.10.2014 1:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Craniophora malesiae / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 1:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Craniophora malesiae

26.10.2014 1:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Steroma superba / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 1:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Steroma superba / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 1:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymanopoda obsoleta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 1:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymanopoda obsoleta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 1:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Pedaliodes porima / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 1:09, Irina Nikulina:

In comments to the author isNarope minor

26.10.2014 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Steroma superba?

26.10.2014 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Steroma superba?

26.10.2014 0:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Punapedaliodes flavopunctata?

26.10.2014 0:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pronophila unifasciata?

26.10.2014 0:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pedaliodes tucca?

26.10.2014 0:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pedaliodes porima

26.10.2014 0:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pedaliodes obscura?

26.10.2014 0:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pedaliodes obscura?

26.10.2014 0:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Magneuptychia modesta?

26.10.2014 0:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lymanopoda obsoleta?

26.10.2014 0:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lymanopoda obsoleta?

25.10.2014 23:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

25.10.2014 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

25.10.2014 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

25.10.2014 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

25.10.2014 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

2011-12-05 00:00:00 2011-12-05 09:22:26.

25.10.2014 22:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Inope heterogyna / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.10.2014 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Andrey Ponomarev.

25.10.2014 21:59, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkInope heterogynaDIO-Procridinae detail view, even when dealt with Illiberis. It is not Illiberis, their wings translucent, not Jordanita paupera, whose head, chest and upper PC with metal block. shine, not Artona (Amuria) - they have a whitish-yellow spots on the wings, and, of course, not Rhagades pruni. Remains race Inope. According to the WFD Sinev 2 types - maerens and heterogyna. They differ only in size (heterogyna much larger) and genital.Image maerens can immediately see http://www.jpmoth.org/Zygaenidae/Procridinae/Inope_maerens.html But Flight maerens - July-August, and heterogyna - June-July (to insects of the Far East. Volume 5, Part 5, p.153 ), therefore, based on the date of shooting, I stopped at heterogyna. It seems reasonably))

25.10.2014 20:33, Evgeny Komarov:

As for the lack of the genus in Uruguay - apparently defect :) Around (Brazil, Bolivia), and in Uruguay there. Rhode exactly Pyrrhopyge, and with a view of the author, probably right (osbenno here this picture http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34548 - maybe the same copy.). Here you can review the American http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/Hesperiidae.htm.With red color front of the pronotum of this type, with concurrence of the other features on this site gets only the author's version.

25.10.2014 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Replaced photos top and underside added. Here it is necessary to change the defined (see. Comment).

25.10.2014 19:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

DVasily! / So much for the good of Fiji and suitable site http://www.usp.ac.fj/fileadmin/current_site/fijimoths/families-id.php

25.10.2014 19:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima pandocus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 19:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima pandocus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 19:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima pandocus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 19:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well, this is the largest family and local Ypthima pandocus Moore, [1858]

25.10.2014 19:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.10.2014 19:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dindica alaopis / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 19:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.10.2014 19:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieriballia viardi / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 19:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieriballia viardi / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 19:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male Pieriballia viardi (Boisduval, 1836)

25.10.2014 19:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male Pieriballia viardi (Boisduval, 1836)

25.10.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

25.10.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

25.10.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

25.10.2014 19:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ammoconia caecimacula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.10.2014 19:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dindica alaopis

25.10.2014 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene already about this species had a discussion yesterday: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34536 (where the author also suggested to the question)
With tolstogolovkami generally can break his head in my :)

25.10.2014 18:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Very similar to Pyrrhopyge charybdis Westwood, 1852

25.10.2014 18:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleora mjoebergi / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 18:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Fascellina albicordis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 18:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyela myops / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 18:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyela myops / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 16:49, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, in the search for the catalog does not work listalke. If you specify, for example, random taxon and region, and the output will be more than one page of found species, you can see only the first. In the transition to the second (or any other, if more than 2), throws in a common gallery to 3874 species. Tested on a few examples.

25.10.2014 16:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, I'm joking. All are serious! Here and so 10 people hanging out in total, but still has some troubles arise.

25.10.2014 16:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lyela myops (Staudinger, 1881)

25.10.2014 16:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For me it Lyela myops (Staudinger, 1881)

25.10.2014 16:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitri, you're joking, or what? )))) Do a good deed, too right, please)))) (Well, that's a serious topic in nafludit).

25.10.2014 16:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleorodes lichenaria / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

25.10.2014 16:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.10.2014 16:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Fascellina albicordis Prout, 1932

25.10.2014 16:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Couple Cleora mjobergi Prout, 1926 copula

25.10.2014 16:09, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

25.10.2014 16:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Arguda erectilinea / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 16:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Arguda erectilinea / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 15:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oh, you and I have any kind of race did not notice. Horseflies and old.

25.10.2014 15:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well Dmitry noticed! What now, offended him?
And why be offended? I do not spit in the soup - mistake corrected. Do not you know who makes mistakes. But if you hurt something to correct your mistakes will no longer)))

25.10.2014 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Parnassius nomion / Evgeny Komarov Parnassius bremeri / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 15:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Palpita persimilis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

25.10.2014 15:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree tolerated. do not forget.
The data is taken from Wikipedia Perez-Gelabert, Daniel E (2008). "Arthropods of Hispaniola (Dominican Republic and Haiti): A checklist and bibliography". Zootaxa 1831: 1-530. It is, as you say, an authoritative publication.

25.10.2014 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Drive, Alexander: "The distribution includes southern Brazil, Bolivia (Sara Department), Peru, Costa Rica, northern Venezuela, Guadeloupe, Saint Kitts, the Dominican Republic, Haiti and Cuba (Munroe 1959 ; Alayo and Valdes Arteaga 1974; Gomez 1999; FSCA and MGCL specimens). ". I'm more focused on it. American site, according to their types, I think can be trusted more than, I'm sorry, Wikipedia (which, by the way, too, the US initially, but "consumer goods" and not know who to introduce information).I agree to transfer to the uncertain and forget.

25.10.2014 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius nomion / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.10.2014 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, in the article to which you are constantly doing link, in English says the difference between this kind from the other two, in Haiti there are two, one is the same. I do not know an angel, I scored in Google and read.Short summary: Wings do not differ, differ somewhat in size, color labial palps and legs (legs not), but reliably genitals.
On top of this species for the Dominican Republic. not given in the check list on the island, but it is not the main thing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Lepidoptera_of_Hispaniola#Pyraustinae

25.10.2014 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here, I think, you have to transfer information of their time shooting from the author's comments, in the "The date and time of shooting / fishing" should look my way: "The time and place / fishing: 2011 -12-05 09-22-26 " Apparently from EXIF ​​drives.

25.10.2014 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, something like that, on the number and location of points on the wings
Especially now comparable. Picture from nature and only you can determine. I confess, I have put in the exact genital beast, but now it is inaccurate.
Left photo by Alexander Dumchusa fragment and a fragment of the right photo from the University of Florida: http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/fruit/olive_shootworm.htm In it I outlined the small plus sign matches, which drew the attention of: three matches, I think enough

I looked the other species, and such was not the case. Maybe overlooked something, I do not know ....

25.10.2014 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to move the underside and toParnassius nomion

25.10.2014 13:21, Peter Khramov:

With regard to the types of transport we have already discussed all Basil. As for the candidates - probably have to dance on the theme of modern destination. I believe that it should be primarily for the discussion moderator questions. From this and repelled when compiling the list. Eugene Karolinska added sincehe participated in the preparation of site classification (adding taxa, etc.), if I remember izmeniyaet. Regarding "Nichrome in general" - in fact, I know.
Eugene - for fotam as agreed, you pile interface for this case, and you can do it.

25.10.2014 13:20, Evgeny Komarov:

The specific question of taxonomy definition I try to "get involved" only if you believe in something 150%, as entomologist another story (I have a site for bugs :)). Therefore, and he offered himself as a moderator of the photos. I read the system area, but on a showdown with Basil Alexander sometimes get tired :).I feel closer to the position of Alexander, he is constantly trying to get across: do not do "Murzilka" - more than enough in the network.The number admitted to official theme is expanded by continually participating in the life of the site, first of all, in varying degrees, have confirmed their adequacy and preferably entomological literacy, second. Tatiana Gordeeva, by the way, is a very good candidate! We would have curators for individual groups ...And all should avoid personal arrivals / grievances. Agree or disagree with anything should always be arguments and emotions better left outside the discussion (if possible). Well, I specifically put bremeri under nomionom. Well Dmitry noticed! What now, offended him? Yes, only with himself for carelessness ...And others, allowed us lyapah (or even lyapah) need to understand the position of the opponent calmly and either agree, disagree or argue. Something like this.

25.10.2014 13:18, Peter Khramov:

I got it. Too lazy to check bravyna.

25.10.2014 13:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Shirley Sekarajasingham.

25.10.2014 12:48, Evgeny Komarov:

That's what happens when you do not watch what you send :( There's caught and shot a bunch nomionov, and Bremer did not pay attention ...). Bremer course no options!

25.10.2014 12:46, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius stubbendorfiifemale

25.10.2014 12:44, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius stubbendorfii, male, I think

25.10.2014 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

25.10.2014 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

25.10.2014 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author was to identify to genus and suggested to the species, but not in Latin. Basil is calculated and corrected, I noticed that too, and wanted to make a comment, but rechecked: Brown is Ortilia velica.

25.10.2014 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would recommend Tatiana Gordeeva leave, others apparently had not interesting. And this theme is really created for the discussion of the site, rather than to clarify the relationship.

25.10.2014 11:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily Sergienko than not a candidate?

25.10.2014 11:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sorry, no moderators, and users with access to the system area.

25.10.2014 11:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Some comrades are registered in the moderator, and I at all have not seen, nor photos nor definitions damn general.

25.10.2014 11:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Let zabem as a subspecies. Ie erectilinea lipara Tams, 1935.

25.10.2014 11:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suppose, too, brings species

25.10.2014 11:50, Peter Khramov:

Yes, sort of not quite normal. Where is the general opinion, where this kind of carry? And about sympatric also interesting to listen to ...

25.10.2014 11:49, Peter Khramov:

The author was to determine (guess) just before the race.

25.10.2014 11:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Shirley Sekarajasingham Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2014 11:47, Peter Khramov:

So. If there are signs by which one can determine, Basil, describe them in the comments. If anyone knows foty defined without sufficient justification (the signs are not visible, and so forth) - unsubscribe in the comments to this fotam, will rule.

25.10.2014 11:44, Peter Khramov:

Where to return? Basil is in the reduction of the list for service threads is still here.

25.10.2014 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lithostege farinata / Confidently identified / Female / Basil Sergienko.

25.10.2014 11:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

no doubt Parnassius bremeri, but wait for the author.

25.10.2014 11:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

But, nomiona he does not pull, but as Bremer, so very suitable.
Here, too, you can see: http: //goran.waldeck.se/paindex2.htm

25.10.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Did. Today, just a couple of the same species there, bezetiketochnyh in inaccurate or neoprene. I put, so I asked)

25.10.2014 11:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By analogy with the authors and the year of description))

25.10.2014 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why is that?

25.10.2014 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Krasnoyarsk region in square brackets [Krasnoyarsk] :))

25.10.2014 11:18, Peter Khramov:

Let's see, what Eugene says about it ...

25.10.2014 11:18, Basil Sergienko:

L.farinata, according to the data given in the article, the second is only for the south of Kazakhstan (Almaty) and further south. All isledovanie copies. in the article of July, the June-this.
A review of the species of Lithostege Hübner, [1825] 1816 (Lepidoptera:
Geometridae, Larentiinae), occurring in Iran and adjacent countries, with
description of two new species from Iran and Pakistan
HOSSEIN RAJAEI SH. *, DIETER STÜNING * & JAAN VIIDALEPP **

25.10.2014 10:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliomata glarearia / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

25.10.2014 10:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil offers to return. He is the most active on the site.

25.10.2014 10:51, Peter Khramov:

I thought further on the issue. I suggest, on the contrary, the list of participants to cut threads, as dofiga silent types, or people, who are on the site a hundred years he was not. I propose to leave / add those who perform any function plus moderator Eugene Karolniskogo as Power user. Iesuch a list: Alexander Zhakov Yevgeny Komarov, Dmitry Pozhogin, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Irina Nikulin Evgeny Caroline, I am. A large part of the more general topics can always be discussed and on the public.
Meaning cuts - a topic still more to discuss moderatorstva should be, and not some sort of secret discussion ...Interesting views of all - and who propose to leave, and who propose to delete from the topic (you never know, maybe I think that people do not read, and even, as it reads, and even to look, what the thread writes: -)
ZY Basil comments about voluntary has added.

25.10.2014 10:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I was plagued by doubt that this guy Parnassius bremeri

25.10.2014 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I am writing to the Krasnoyarsk Territory, in geography. At least something will.

25.10.2014 10:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

But who is this?

25.10.2014 10:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parnassius nomion / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.10.2014 10:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasya, thank you! But not yet ready to engage in wintering species - both matured, I will torment you (although we Triturus vulgaris full + Siberian salamander is). Now The technique of breeding and rearing of larvae to metamorphosis to a plastic tropical species, then I'll start with the more difficult.

25.10.2014 10:29, Basil Sergienko:

Heliomata glarearia

25.10.2014 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, a joke, probably :)
And you, our 2, suburban type, do not need an hour? Comb (Triturus cristatus) and Common (Triturus vulgaris). I can catch in April, nothing. Yes, I have, in the woods one swamp, where, as a child (the 1970s), I inspired them myself, they're accustomed, and they became fully :)

25.10.2014 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Autumn: In my there related to Krasnoyarsk that it was ...

25.10.2014 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not like "wrappers". Condition good, and therefore loaded. Throwing hand does not rise (

25.10.2014 9:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Wait another opinion. I hate neeteketirovanny material.

25.10.2014 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you. Bring your while. I myself can not yet, as you know. I did not want bezetiketochnogo shipping ..... This is how to lose the label .... (

25.10.2014 9:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It Parnassius nomion

25.10.2014 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He added underside and changed over.

25.10.2014 6:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, is to add, that you found it necessary to bring in the share that a functional temporary care of me, in our, mutual, consent. And, now it reads as if, I hit on the rights of (albeit temporarily), in connection with the mine, the last post.My reasons for adding new users to the system area:
I think we should ask the users want / can, whether they take part (active), in that private discussions before opening them access?It is still official theme created by and to discuss issues that are sometimes quite sensitive and therefore they can not stand on the public. I do not see the need to read polsayta the way, we're sometimes laemsya and go to the individual. Here, and so enough people that were not discussed, but only read it all .....

24.10.2014 23:57, Peter Khramov:

By agreement with Vasiliy Feoktistov, temporarily takes away the opportunity to transfer to the kinds of photons. By agreement with Dmitry Pozhogin to him constantly comes to the possibility of carrying ph species.

24.10.2014 23:56, Peter Khramov:

Made in the Old Public temporary change of roles, the rest - so far only in the system area. As users agree. Objections against those who have add?

24.10.2014 23:54, Peter Khramov:

For the time being it is impossible for Uruguay. But we are on the way ... The only thing that I could not put down all ph "other foty the same individual," ie, possible neighboring foty the same instance, and the rooms they are not exactly adjacent (but they are loaded at the same time, that is still somewhere nearby).

24.10.2014 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Label, alas, hopelessly lost, and Parnassius sp. some very beautiful and quite large. FemaleParnassius actius? or someParnassius nomion? (confuse especially red eyes on the front wings). Both assumptions are wrong: they did not realize, it is summarized and ask people to understand. Maybe the photo will come in handy for the site?

24.10.2014 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.10.2014 23:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Label, alas, hopelessly lost, and Parnassius sp. some very beautiful. FemaleParnassius actius? nomiona subspecies or some? Does not think they entirely. Can a knowledgeable person will bring to mind the image and useful for the site?

24.10.2014 23:03, Irina Nikulina:

Buck

24.10.2014 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.10.2014 22:59, Irina Nikulina:

Buck

24.10.2014 22:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.10.2014 22:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurata herrickii / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.10.2014 22:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male, for sure :) kind only found on two sites, but from Uruguay. Other species of the genus, very far.

24.10.2014 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not think that we should all make it in at all, just probably need to add users to the official topic. During this year the topic was 6 of 13 people, I suggest, not without excluding anyone, add active people now online, which are discussions on the pages species -on vskidku Yuri Semeykin Irina Nikulin, Shamil Murtazin.This is my proposal.

24.10.2014 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips viola / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.10.2014 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

she is not only the head, but the opposite of the red :), but you can not make a selection of Uruguay, surely it would be several dozen species in all, and this maybe one.

24.10.2014 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is hopeless at all: there are many such, Red Heads.

24.10.2014 22:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not one species of this genus is not given for Uruguay might be found in another way.

24.10.2014 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Angle difficult. Especially tolstogolovka and a large genus. Hopeless option in my opinion.

24.10.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I should add here much to bear on the public in my opinion. It is necessary that people do not have access here too familiar.

24.10.2014 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

ProbablyEurata herrickiimale.

24.10.2014 20:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica margarita / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 20:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica margarita / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, then, probably to blame, twice mentioned in our correspondence with Dmitry, comrade, "Holloway" Holloway , but it really is very famous for joint and incomprehensibility qualifier :) It has proved popular for a long time ... Everything is fine here .. :)

24.10.2014 19:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eunica margarita (Godart, [1824])

24.10.2014 19:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eunica margarita (Godart, [1824])

24.10.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, everything is normal, I can already see I am a user. I hope it will reduce the degree really :)

24.10.2014 19:37, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. Chet not quite caught up with me about this most sympatric. Taki is the period when the species can still be considered the same, but its different populations, which are not geographically separated, do not interbreed with each other?

24.10.2014 19:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Perisama or Orophila but kind of pass. We need underside

24.10.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Shirley Sekarajasingham.

24.10.2014 19:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ortilia velica / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 19:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ortilia velica (Hewitson, 1864) without options

24.10.2014 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonestis lipara Arguda erectilinea.

24.10.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonestis lipara Arguda erectilinea.

24.10.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Odonestis lipara Arguda erectilinea.

24.10.2014 19:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily motivate "consider him still a subspecies Arguda erectilinea"

24.10.2014 19:13, Peter Khramov:

Today met Basil, voicing resume. In order to reduce a degree online:
1. Basil temporarily not transfer the rights to the types of photos. Ie he will define and write the definition in the comments to the species at the level of the average user.
eleven.Request to the modders, who will have the right to transfer, to respond to certain users - transport, explaining why no transfer or memo supposedly accepted svedeneiyu how to check, so reacts.
2. Dmitry Pozhogin be allowed to transfer photos (primarily - exotics).
3.All disputed issues are discussed not in personal correspondence, and online - on the public service, or topic.
4. When communicating all based on the fact that no one at no one is attacking, to no one finds fault and no one is protected. It is considered undesirable and activities applied chlenometriey site.
5.We try to the maximum to disable and enable etotsionalny background constructive. Ie conduct a dialogue on the principle ... I think so, all the consonants / No, not all, at not so, and commercials, because: n. 1, p. 2, n. 3 / Yes, but you did not realize that: n. 1, p. 2 ...
5.1 It goes without saying, the manifestations of emotions, where they are relevant and not vidut conflicts (in the negative sense) - is only a plus. Iemakes people robot tehnotronikov we do not call, moreover, the site is much less restrictions on religious jokes, humor, national, homophobic and other similar topics than is generally accepted.
Basil, if I do rusty, Add me.

24.10.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is hard to decide on her own. Confused and almost all the links lead to the moths of borneo, where a lot of unknown classification .....
However, there are a subspecies of eol Odonestis erectilinea lipara Tams, 1935 : http://eol.org/pages/30590577/overview And there funet.fi view Arguda erectilinea Swinhoe, 1904 (without subspecies), which has spread just on Borneo and Sumatra: http: //ftp.funet.fi / index / Tree_of_life / insecta / lepidoptera / ditrysia / bombycoidea / lasiocampidae / lasiocampinae / arguda / summarize the information and views, take stillArguda erectilineaand transfer photos to this species. And created incorrectly because of confusion in the classification of the form Odonestis lipara Tams, 1935 to remove from here because I believe it still subspecies Arguda erectilinea. I would like to ask more reviews :)

24.10.2014 19:02, Peter Khramov:

You are welcome to visit!
Exactly! It must establish the intra international relations!

24.10.2014 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri is Alsophila, very difficult race, you have 5 species, 2 of which are described Belyaev, ot a little earlier Viidalep accordingly there is no picture and I think to distinguish them from the photo is difficult. Turn to Belyaev, is it exactly who does not detect.

24.10.2014 16:55, Alexander Belousov:

You are welcome to visit!

24.10.2014 12:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the evening's see now, with good intentions, I have no time. Maybe in the evening, and other fresh ideas will :)
P.S. Here 'Friend' Holloway or somebody similar, apparently put his hand tightly .....

24.10.2014 12:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What's not clear? We need to solve this kind of subspecies or erectilinea all !!! If you believe vidom- score view race. If subspecies / form - then carry erectilinea

24.10.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing is clear .. And Arguda erectilinea Swinhoe, 1904 there: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/65106
Understand more do you want? Or transfer? Or view is there to do?

24.10.2014 12:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rod even listed here.

24.10.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The head hurts already, Dimitri. From firewood? Rhode there: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/29148

24.10.2014 12:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

More specifically there are 3 types. Genus described by Arguda decurtata Moore, 1879

24.10.2014 12:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In vain did. Both species belong to the genus are now Arguda Moore, 1879

24.10.2014 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did the family, in the form and it suffered.

24.10.2014 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tristeirometa bostryx / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The link that I brought below, there are many types.
Essential and suffered, in short :)

24.10.2014 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonestis lipara / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonestis lipara / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 12:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By definition, the genus name should be in the plural. Plum silkworms. A view of this sort are not alone. Although God knows already.

24.10.2014 12:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odonestis lipara / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it is: http://eol.org/pages/385847/overview here and do in the old Odonestis (Germar, 1812) There, in the way one views the genus: Odonestis pruni (Linnaeus, 1758 ) and all that generation after him named Silkworm plum , consider it wrong and the Russian name of the genus name is clear: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/1197

24.10.2014 12:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

First www.mothsofborneo.com - kosyachny garbage and there is so much Holloway hung noodles, even in simple Saturn and revelers could not understand. Top Borneo nothing, but you need to check back every time.
In vtoryh- is not born with a double name, as many believe lipara subspecies / form Odonestis erectilinea.The latter type of material, and I caught me there, but genital differences with lipara there is no no. Still I think this is kind-Odonestis lipara, in my opinion.

24.10.2014 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.10.2014 12:09, Peter Khramov:

Well so there Well written everything. There are two views - that this subspecies erectilinea and that an independent view. The first link is written, they say, as long as no geo isolation Borneo lёtayut simultaneously erectilinea and lipara, then it is not a subspecies, and the same kind of independent. Although, if I remember correctly, this can be within a species, but right now is definitely not dogonyams ...Or, Dmitry, you are these staples like something else to say?

24.10.2014 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xandrames latiferaria / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 11:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Similar to Ozola apparata

24.10.2014 11:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xandrames latiferaria (Walker, 1860)

24.10.2014 11:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Like some Tympanota

24.10.2014 11:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tristeirometa bostryx (Prout 1932)

24.10.2014 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ozola submontana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 11:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ozola submontana

24.10.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where it is necessary to drive a deal.
Or here: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/lasiocampidae/lasiocampidae_14_2.php?
Or here: http://eol.org/pages/30590577/overview?
Rod with a double or a subgenus called to do anything I do not understand this math (
The site already has a kind of http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/1197, with a single species.
I think that all the same genus: Odonestis erectilinea Swinhoe 1904 to do, but I can not fully understand. And so please help :)

24.10.2014 11:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Everything is in the article
Zolotukhin VV, AV Chuvilin The species composition of the genus Actias Leach, 1815 Russia, the article published in Eversmann, (Eversmannia №19-20, 2009)

24.10.2014 11:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What kind of clarification? From whom?

24.10.2014 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I think and find out in 5 years :)

24.10.2014 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tatiana Gordeeva gave two options, Dmitry one, but the last word of course Dimitri :))

24.10.2014 10:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I myself do not remember, honestly speaking, that I determined it :) Apparently, the glitch of some ...

24.10.2014 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Craniophora malesiae / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 10:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Many unknown overlooking. While I will not do anything. It is necessary for clarification.

24.10.2014 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Krananda semihyalina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Tatyana Gordeeva.

24.10.2014 10:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Defined Tatiana Gordeeva.

24.10.2014 9:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Actias artemis / Tatyana Gordeeva Actias gnoma / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hestina nama / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 9:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hestina nama / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 9:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2014 9:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Actias gnoma

24.10.2014 8:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Krananda semihyalina Moore, 1867

24.10.2014 8:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Odonestis (erectilinea) lipara Tams, 1935

24.10.2014 8:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Odonestis (erectilinea) lipara Tams, 1935

24.10.2014 8:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Odonestis (erectilinea) lipara Tams, 1935

24.10.2014 8:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Craniophora malesiae Holloway, 1989

24.10.2014 8:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Uma did not impose why identified Vasily

24.10.2014 8:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hestina (Hestenalis) nama

24.10.2014 1:13, Peter Khramov:

What it did not identify?

23.10.2014 22:44, Peter Khramov:

I'll have to restart from the account Stas ...

23.10.2014 22:31, Peter Khramov:

Foty continue to download our new poster. Today - pictures from Uruguay.

23.10.2014 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.10.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with other photos from the same individual.

23.10.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Metamorpha elissa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Metamorpha elissa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2014 21:28, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is often in the comments there are "maybe".

23.10.2014 21:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Metamorpha elissa Hübner, [1819]

23.10.2014 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I can only tomorrow evening.

23.10.2014 20:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypanartia kefersteini / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypanartia kefersteini / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2014 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypanartia kefersteini / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2014 20:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia amathea / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

23.10.2014 20:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

the same colias

23.10.2014 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Anartia amathea

23.10.2014 20:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

In comments the author of this type registered :)

23.10.2014 20:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypanartia kefersteini

23.10.2014 20:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypanartia kefersteini

23.10.2014 20:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dynamine postverta / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

23.10.2014 20:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Colias euxanthe like

23.10.2014 20:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Steremnia sp

23.10.2014 20:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dynamine postverta (Cramer, [1780])

23.10.2014 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Corades enyo / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2014 20:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Corades enyo almo Thieme, 1907

23.10.2014 20:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Actinote pyrrha / Shirley Sekarajasingham Actinote pellenea / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2014 20:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

23.10.2014 20:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Actinote pellenea calymna Jordan, 1913

23.10.2014 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, when we communicate? :)

23.10.2014 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia vestina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Junonia vestina

23.10.2014 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hypanartia kefersteini

23.10.2014 18:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agraulis vanillae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.10.2014 18:01, Alex Dumchus:

Heliconius erato

23.10.2014 17:57, Alex Dumchus:

Agraulis vanillae

23.10.2014 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not knowing the size and in this perspective, it is difficult to say that either. Be sure to lay out the expanded and look at thisAmmoconia caecimacula, not like?

23.10.2014 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis corylana / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.10.2014 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 17:24, Alexander Belousov:

Wingspan - 18 mm

23.10.2014 17:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Pandemis corylana (Fabricius, 1794)

23.10.2014 15:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, the caterpillar is taken in the Botanical Garden (by the way I said it). Yes oak leaves there at this time already, but like the rose, which bloom and the leaves have. .
Well, you can probably inaccurate in.

23.10.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis profundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis profundana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis profundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis profundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis profundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2014 14:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

It leans more toward Eudemis profundana, where the main coarse oak, while Eudemis porphyrana Rosaceae, oak, willow - is rare.
Probably it can be inaccurate Eudemis profundana

23.10.2014 13:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

The determinants of the Hebrews. USSR (t.IV, P1, page 414) for Eudemis profundana only Europe and Asia Minor, probably really happened in the invasion DV :))

23.10.2014 13:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Forage caterpillars - Quercus mongolica

23.10.2014 13:44, Yuri Semejkin:

The genus 3 species. Eudemis gyrotis - can be eliminated. This species per.krl. grayish-blackish brown with a wedge-shaped spot on the dorsal edge.
Next: E. porphyrana. This type of pen. KRL. without wedge blackish spots on the dorsal edge of the border basal field.
This is something that can be said is in appearance.
And the third variant of E. profundana of information about appearance I have not.Forage Mongolian oak. But that does nothing. The description of all 3 types are marked different food plants, in Vol. H. And Mongolian oak.

23.10.2014 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow throw. Including its mistakes to hurt anybody was not.

23.10.2014 13:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, thank you, I saw, but wanted to clarify :)

23.10.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

just wanted polest determinant in DV, and you had already. :))

23.10.2014 13:28, Irina Nikulina:

Here http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/51_Tortricidae/5002%20Olethreutinae/framepage_olethreutinae2.htm and looked to insects of the Far East (v.5, p3, page 287) specified, except Europe, Japan, Korea, Mal. Asia

23.10.2014 13:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes. I marked them as one individual.

23.10.2014 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

There Eudemis profundana, there are three other species, or I do not look back?
http://jpmoth.org/Tortricidae/Olethreutinae/Eudemis.html

23.10.2014 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, call each night. From this body. write sentences.

23.10.2014 13:14, Irina Nikulina:

Sash, perhaps, profundana not from Europe, because both types, there are closer, in Japan, for example, on imeyutsya- jpmoth both est.Pravda, there is something red on the back of the photo is not visible

23.10.2014 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's a butterfly emerged from the chrysalis?

23.10.2014 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, and on what the plant assembled doll?

23.10.2014 12:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, genital types of appearance are not determined.

23.10.2014 12:29, Peter Khramov:

Basil, let'll cover the topic of migrants before I met you, or call each other three. Just like all the other topics that uses emotional statements.

23.10.2014 12:27, Peter Khramov:

If there genital types are defined by their appearance - it is wrong and needs correction. Throw links will rule. Inaccurate - this is when you have a reason to lean it to this kind among others. Make a list of these grounds pliz.

23.10.2014 11:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Yuri, the Butterfly reliably determined by genitalia, but I reviewed many images in the net, both from Europe and from Asia to Europe and the literature, but did not find E. porphyrana with a red back and red beams of her scales. If the butterflies are not collected. then we have two options:
1.Interesting color variation Eudemis porphyrana, which is not among the scanned image of this species.
2. This Eudemis profundana, which was brought to the Far East with the planting material from Europe, ie invasion occurred, and the type is now present in the Far East. But to promote area to the east for thousands of kilometers, only photo scary :))). If you find a publication on Eudemis profundana on DV.put it, if we find the exact image from the back of a red Eudemis profundana, put it.
If specimens collected one option to cook :))

23.10.2014 8:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! Let's start with what we see, instead of the conventional wisdom. I've added the individual can help, although the qualifier says that is determined by the genitals.

23.10.2014 2:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate. In the very first, my comments, reference is made, on which the butterfly was determined by habit. That is enough: here all photos of nature as defined and including such well-genital types.

23.10.2014 2:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

23.10.2014 2:40, Peter Khramov:

All information is added. Please check the definitions that have to make it clear how much accurate information from the author. Well, of course, to determine the types of vozomzhnosti where foty without definition. Ie You can transfer, comments, etc. the full program.
Many photons would be technically and aesthetically not very good quality.But it is loaded with a reserve may be useful for determining at adjacent pictures or no one will be shot for the species. If these goals are not foty serve - do not hesitate to write them in the comments, we will delete it.
ZY This is just the beginning. Planned for loading and other pictures of the author.

23.10.2014 1:55, Peter Khramov:

I begin to slowly load foty exotic butterflies and not by a new author. Today - pictures of Bolivia. Please do not comment them and do not tolerate as long as I am in this topic does not add relevant comments, as author's comments to the photos, the geography and the definition will be recorded later on the photos themselves.

23.10.2014 0:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would sayEudemis profundana, but it is not in Siberia.

23.10.2014 0:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Eudemis porphyrana ?

22.10.2014 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Of course you can call each other and likely to need that would not take up too much space the text.

22.10.2014 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Now there is the possibility of binding to other taxa levels. But the future Fautua reserve, yes. Only the type of Untie, Basil, if I agree. And if you do not agree - say where disagrees.

22.10.2014 22:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm the type of Cuba have

22.10.2014 22:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Write Palpita sp, even photos which characterizes the genus have

22.10.2014 22:30, Peter Khramov:

You may want more time to phone three in Skype.

22.10.2014 22:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Here, Aleksanlr Dumchus! You must first catch, and then take pictures, and then give the material definition. And then came the winter (I -9 outside!), Entomologists are now all swear to each other begin to boredom.

22.10.2014 22:24, Peter Khramov:

Rename. Foty do, that it was possible, I have spelled out this task.

22.10.2014 22:22, Peter Khramov:

Znachitsa so.
If this species is distinguished from its neighbors only on the genitals and on the basis that in this photo are not visible, then you need to send back to undefined.

22.10.2014 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Ok.

22.10.2014 22:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and do to a photo can be inserted directly here.

22.10.2014 22:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Give 'fishing in the tropics "

22.10.2014 22:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I sometimes affects your biological ignorance and from this all our conflicts. I'll explain the reasons why your actions were wrong, but the answer I hear "the fool" this is what I accept your epithets like, kicking, carp, everywhere trying to hurt you.And you do not even realize that I sometimes write if you do not understand, it is very sad, all the same what that baggage biological knowledge necessary to have, if you understand and answer - "Why kick", then very bad. For today two of misunderstanding about what I write.
1.How many times have we foreheads faced that there are species that the photos are not defined or determined very bad, and why did you write to me, "boil photos of nature" that nonsense, he said that the definition of the ears is energized, and it is "the fool "Go boil a photo.Basil, you know what I'm writing? If you have the option of two or more species, to assign specific name, precise and exact not scientific and ethical. It is in the magazine "Murzilka" All animals have names. here only to the definition of family, if not in the hands of the butterfly. I got it? nor that the photos do not have to cook.
2.Pearl in "Erinnyis ello" - "parent zone" I wrote "I agree with Peter, that's right Zoogeographical, dead head in Europe is also a migrant, but is everywhere." where are the charges? and where I kicked you? And he confirmed the correctness of notes Peter is very fair.Mother region (source region), the term in this situation is not perfect, it is in the cases fail to expansion. When migrating other terms are used: a complicated area, which includes regular migration, breeding and wintering grounds - all this area of ​​the species distribution.The habitat of the dead head and oleander hawk, and also includes convolvulaceae Europe. Wow opening !? For you, yes? Yes, they are migrants, the majority arrives from the south, and sometimes even give two generations, and how to write some books fly back to the south (at least part of the population).You see, the difference between expansion and migration?
I read a lot of books since childhood, learned to read at Lampert :)
All your lapses and errors will be corrected, not on purpose, not by hazard and fairness, and that I do not like it, too, will speak.Or anything personal, without emotion, but painful to watch as the site of "Murzilka" for primary school age are trying to do (this is grotesque). And, Basil, do not laments that hurt you not deserved all the comments. Point to your mistakes (again, this is my opinion and I could be wrong, too), the goal - this the right site and not hurt Feoktistov.Do well and no one will make remarks to himself the same attitude is expected to do i cant, specify where, specifically, correct if wrong, it is not offensive or anything.

22.10.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, do not: it is really very rare (ditserok not one species and all look like) :) More in dreams there is Dicerca amphibia Marseul, 1865 Find. She, along with the aforementioned "softwood ditserkoy" - a very rare species. Should there be, for biotope :) This is generally a "celebration of life" will be. And in Kazakhstan, hit the road, I think, necessarily :)

22.10.2014 21:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oh, you and I threw these more than once. So that is going to Kazakhstan. I can assist.
http://www.rhopalocera.com/kaz2010.html

22.10.2014 21:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Singing, not to forget - even interested in salamanders (not fire) and caecilians are very interested in, especially aquatic species, type genus Typhlonectes

22.10.2014 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:)

22.10.2014 21:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And why in spite of himself? From life you need to have fun! Especially from the expedition.

22.10.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov:

Come on, Basil. It is high time!

22.10.2014 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, but not you yourself :) Most of spite :)

22.10.2014 21:18, Peter Khramov:

The wording of our laws are such that pretty much left to the interpretation of the judge. Nevertheless, "it means it has been caught by someone," even there, no. On the other hand, there is mention of private collections as such.

22.10.2014 21:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

But, in spite :)
This unfortunately, in spite of what?

22.10.2014 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthia ocellaris / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.10.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, boil a photo from nature :) Here, by the way is full of these, set out in precise, including you :) No offense. I do not see more sense to continue these mutual slinging is unknown what and who inspired.

22.10.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But, in spite :)

22.10.2014 20:02, Alex Dumchus:

Normal header. Catching abroad - it is catching and Ukraine. And so, all clear-warm edges :)

22.10.2014 18:38, Peter Khramov:

And we have moved into a green winter white winter.

22.10.2014 18:37, Peter Khramov:

"It will be an opportunity: I will go :)"
He's lying, do not believe him, I do not believe!

22.10.2014 18:01, Peter Khramov:

You when they want?

22.10.2014 17:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

22.10.2014 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis porphyrana / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

22.10.2014 17:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Eudemis porphyrana ?

22.10.2014 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you'll again say that finding fault, why it should be persimilis? The island has four species of this genus, and 3 are the same, all the genital, the remaining differences are very small and in the photo are not visible.

22.10.2014 16:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sing - a stupid question !!! Buy I want!

22.10.2014 16:28, Peter Khramov:

And those what for?

22.10.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

22.10.2014 16:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If he only you- keep.

22.10.2014 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Panorama is the story of a little - a little: http://maya-milonova.livejournal.com/26422.html

22.10.2014 15:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dim, if you need the satyr: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/54284 That, too, will give: without question :)

22.10.2014 15:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ok, I will keep in mind.

22.10.2014 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It will be able to: I will go :) And on personal impressions so far: in the Urals (p. Chusovaia) and Trans-Baikal p. Ingoda, Turga (tributary Onon) and he Onon): nowhere guzzle as in Meshchora :)

22.10.2014 15:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Who is in the poultry market, please see what kinds of newts bought and how much. It is advisable to make a picture, and that sellers usually do not know do not fuck

22.10.2014 15:28, Alex Dumchus:

OK. Then I decide - I put it separately. I'm interested in papilionidae, nymphalidae, saturnidae, sphinghidae, - probably the tropics, because Palearctic collected (except rare), that's probably all ...

22.10.2014 15:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Or Vasiliy- sezdit on !!! There also compared.

22.10.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

она

22.10.2014 15:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

End of the Line - Kindergarten! But when exposed body is not visible because of the mosquitoes, but only koposhashuyusya mass - wow !!!

22.10.2014 15:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Please replace)))

22.10.2014 15:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Which group are you interested in, and from what regions. Mail send 1 pc would be foolish. Collect satyr then decide.

22.10.2014 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well replacement ask Peter and all: the system run-up and running "with a bang" :)

22.10.2014 15:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This photo is in the furnace.

22.10.2014 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The source added, made an appearance and suffered :) Dmitry Stas, Respect great :)
P.S. Dmitry and billions of mosquitoes and other bloodsucking insects: this is nonsense. Indeed, under the End of the Line, you know very well served and how many in Meshchora entogo good :)

22.10.2014 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lymantria storozhenkoae.

22.10.2014 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By the way there, at or very assailed Cossus. We flew hundreds. We are their procedure simply fold the screen, thinking it Cossus cossus, but did not want to collect them - zazhireyut. Then they all decided to take a couple of pieces for Yakovlev (maybe from this point he was not), Roman said afterwards that it is very rare Cossus bohatschi. Here it happens.Generally cool place (Catocala- 6 species, 11 species brazhniki- just zhuchya Sea), but it is very hard to catch. Billions of mosquitoes and the terms of the swamp.

22.10.2014 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, do look and endure. Eversmann article is the original description. If a problem, then I can do.

22.10.2014 14:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Photos will try to do better, and male and female. And in general, I'm not too upset if it would be a form of the area. Apparently I did not ambitious.

22.10.2014 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So, I do look and stand. First description Eversmann do?

22.10.2014 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He only Agrius in Costa Rica: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/CRsphinx.htm Good sources are correct (the lists) have at hand :)
P.S. Tie in a group, with photos :) # 34400

22.10.2014 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

22.10.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, if I did not read the article, I would not have written previous posts. I merely stated my opinion that in no way detracts from, that great work that has been done by the description of this taxon. This is clearly not a subspecies may polyploidy or some mutant recessive gene, enshrined in a typical neighborhood.In any case the information in the synonyms can not be expected in the coming years. Type should be entered on the site, based on the original description. But I would like better pictures, as this is the only photo in the network.

22.10.2014 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For erinnisov Respect, Alexander variable they ..... :)

22.10.2014 14:18, Alex Dumchus:

Agrius cingulatus ??? Please confirm.

22.10.2014 13:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

So far no one has brought synonymous. The publication was, and Eversmann very serious magazine. Incidentally species was described, I would say casually, as we are not specialists in the Moths. The series is very different from the others, in the above privacy mustache males. Read the article - there is not only a description of the type, but also on the analysis of subspecies Lymantria dyspar

22.10.2014 13:03, Alex Dumchus:

Fumbling on the bottom of the barrel. I turn up another neraspravlennuyu in good condition. I can succeed at something.

22.10.2014 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, e Kinh photos :) Pavone, this season is not seen at all at any stage, but there is a bit of output from the caterpillars, 2013.

22.10.2014 12:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, you can create a new thread in the forum (the "Community").
In principle, any message can be put photos. Only need this first photo on another site and then post a link to specify =)

22.10.2014 11:57, Alex Dumchus:

Speaking of bugs. Caught there beautiful barbel, there is a photo where to lay? Ready to trade on the butterflies can promised to Pavon.

22.10.2014 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well to make a general key to all the collection just to ...
And if there is a section on beetles, then I do not imagine: I have them a lot (it's more than my time-) :)

22.10.2014 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

In addition to publishing with the original description, there is a publication of this type? Are there any other findings of this species? With all due respect to the authors describe, remain serious doubts about his independence (for me), even so, his identification by other entomologists among Lymantria dispar. It may be that the form will be reliably known only from the type series.The primary source to drive the form on the website is always self-sufficient. Eversmann -100%, and the other source just yet.

22.10.2014 11:48, Alex Dumchus:

I have several times more will. Something reluctance. Monkey work - IMHO :)

22.10.2014 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the Dominican Republic there is such: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/eello.htm Volatility is likely :) Spread More hawk moths, of course, it is interesting to dig.

22.10.2014 11:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No questions :)

22.10.2014 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes clarki / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.10.2014 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm led to Eversmann link. Can it be considered a good source?

22.10.2014 11:24, Peter Khramov:

And here Googol. If the authors have published a description, then everything is OK. Dim, published?

22.10.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

At the same time he added a new source: University of Florida, authoritative organization :)

22.10.2014 11:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Palpita persimilis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 11:00, Alex Dumchus:

I ello c Argentina and Fr.Gviany not of this kind. Today and tomorrow will post, at the same time a couple of erinnisov who have no ph

22.10.2014 10:56, Alex Dumchus:

Not tersa it and clarki - incidentally the most common type in the Dominican Republic. You can collect dozens, took 8, others spared - let

22.10.2014 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Palpita persimilis: http://entnemdept.ufl.edu/creatures/fruit/olive_shootworm.htm

22.10.2014 10:50, Alex Dumchus:

This is a photo to show how many butterflies on a flowering tree. Also present vanillae Dryas julia, Euptoieta claudia and Belyanko

22.10.2014 10:48, Alex Dumchus:

On the front Euptoieta claudia

22.10.2014 10:47, Alexander Belousov:

Our season is still going on! ;-D

22.10.2014 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here, I can not understand who is in the foreground and in the background againAgraulis vanillae:)

22.10.2014 10:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the foreground, it is likelyAgraulis vanillaeAlexander kidding :)

22.10.2014 10:21, Alexander Belousov:

"Warming up the engine" after the refrigerator

22.10.2014 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Horama panthalon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Horama panthalon: http://www.pbase.com/image/103530756 stand in exact.

22.10.2014 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:) Congratulations to crop a still-more tightly. Stas on molbiole wrote this: Lymantria storozhenkoae Korb et Pozhogin, 2012 : http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=180517&view=findpost&p=1368094 True, it is not clear whether the form can be added . Until Google finds only Molbiol and Eversmann: http://eversmannia.entomology.ru/31-32.htm

22.10.2014 9:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If the insect is protected in the collection, so it has been caught by someone. This means that the display can also be risky :)
About the sale, profit:
One person has caught totally protected in MalaysiaTrogonoptera brookianaand now does not know where to attach them, although the form, despite their status, there are platitudes. That's what happens :)

22.10.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You can migrate gradually. In just a few taps of its already 327 "zahrenachil" :) Of course, the work is tedious, I understand.

22.10.2014 8:18, Alex Dumchus:

And I do not know what to say. In exchange I have a single-list for those interested. All sfotat online and straightened butterflies from my collection. And many of those who have already been foty site, Fautua Wrap each in the "Collections" and long-has put a thankless. Peter, can you all of my gross zahrenachit there :)

22.10.2014 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill: although no rear wings, it's definitely hard to say.

22.10.2014 6:31, Alexander Belousov:

Again he came across a typo. On page Collectible copies butterflies users - Parameters selection "Define s ivshy." Peter, correct.

22.10.2014 5:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diphthera festiva / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.10.2014 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.10.2014 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Controversial questions arise again:
View first did, and sent to theEmpyreuma pugione. Many unknown and where there ponavbivali as synonyms? I would like to propose to deal with them.
The valid name for this copy. Empyreuma affinis Rothschild, 1912 (it stands on the site have synonyms Empyreuma pugione, dwelling in Puerto Rico). Base here: http://www7.inra.fr/papillon/arctiid/texteng/e_affini.htm
"Synonyms
Empyreuma mucro Draudt nec Zerny
Empyreuma haitensis Rothschild

Empyreuma pugione auct. (nec Linnaeus, E.pugione L. is a different species living in Puerto-Rico). "
A copy of the butterfly itself, is not Puerto Rican, and I hope that I made the right kind.

22.10.2014 4:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Empyreuma pugione Empyreuma affinis.

22.10.2014 4:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Empyreuma pugione Empyreuma affinis.

22.10.2014 4:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Empyreuma pugione / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 4:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Empyreuma pugione / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 4:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enyo lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 3:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Xylophanes tersait in my opinion. Here: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/DRsphinx.htm he feels fine in the list.

22.10.2014 3:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas amphichloe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.10.2014 3:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas amphichloe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.10.2014 3:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erinnyis ello / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 3:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erinnyis ello / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 3:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enyo lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 3:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enyo lugubris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 3:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyles lineata / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.10.2014 3:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes rhodocera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.10.2014 3:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes rhodocera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.10.2014 3:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They are. I stand. Dominican hawk moths on the pictures to drive well here: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/DRsphinx.htm

22.10.2014 3:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callionima falcifera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 3:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callionima falcifera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 2:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes pluto / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 2:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes pluto / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 2:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes pluto / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 2:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes pluto / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 2:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He was there alone.

22.10.2014 2:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protambulyx strigilis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 2:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protambulyx strigilis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2014 1:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tetheella fluctuosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.10.2014 23:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If muzhik- i, if the woman-ae

21.10.2014 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Cool. It must be kind to add. By the way, did not Storozhenki written there? Not the essence, kanesh, but curious.

21.10.2014 23:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lymantria storozhenkoae Korb et Pozhogin, sp.n

21.10.2014 23:02, Peter Khramov:

A friend pachimu Dumchus not spread copies a section of the collection? .. [Tried to squint curiously, taking a pipe from his mouth]

21.10.2014 22:59, Peter Khramov:

And that is true. I'm in the same hotel the Nizhniy Novgorod and said, after 18 hours, no, no! However, it was the winter ...

21.10.2014 22:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Renamed the subject would "catch abroad," and somehow it sounds ironic.

21.10.2014 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Satire is always necessary, and any.

21.10.2014 22:41, Alex Dumchus:

That's why I'm not collect fines. And the vision is not hard to spread currents.
But if you need something to catch, then zavsegda please :)

21.10.2014 22:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Trifle stored on napkins problem - they secrete a liquid and dry on tightly. Mattresses and sleeping in a box store. That did not fly flies and ants from wasps - put in a box with cotton dichlorvos or ethyl acetate.

21.10.2014 22:33, Alex Dumchus:

Here I'm not going satyrs. Somehow it did not happen ... As for the envelopes and kept in envelopes, but rather between the layers of tissue or toilet paper, even for Mexico zametil- it absorbs more moisture, sometimes me, but am feeling better about themselves butterfly. In Mexico, so do small villages and fly larvae postponed - to morph. It's a pity so. Then I freeze.After that, I try to keep in the refrigerator.

21.10.2014 22:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Everywhere it is not recommended nowhere to retreat.

21.10.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Steremnia selva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Steremnia selva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 22:26, Alex Dumchus:

This is not Thai! In the Dominican Republic all away in the wilderness of waste it is not recommended, the population heavily criminalized, allowed weapons. I moved away for 2-3 km and not very comfortable feeling. And at night, and the hotel is not recommended ...

21.10.2014 22:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There's also a bunch of satyrs species !!! Blues had to look at the edges and meadows. Trifle best kept in envelopes.

21.10.2014 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perigonia lusca / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2014 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perigonia lusca / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2014 22:22, Alex Dumchus:

I not caught, but they were. One with small butterflies I have no friendship :)
If nado- next time .. I was looking for Stradomsky blues, and so they are not there. In general butterflies in storage, especially of small, under 100% humidity - that still work. moldy immediately.I tried cleaning the room after them in the refrigerator to shove, so until the morning ohlazhdalis- then in a suitcase, until the next harvest.

21.10.2014 22:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We had a stream or river to look with clay or sandy beaches where they do Basking and minerals obtained.

21.10.2014 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:) Just a drunk in the trash already ..... Pohuhol, and Nahuhol? Of course :) There are some rock mole, I know :)

21.10.2014 22:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A satire where? small gray or brown!

21.10.2014 22:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Steremnia selva Adams, 1986

21.10.2014 22:09, Alex Dumchus:

That is how? I'll keep it on mind.

21.10.2014 22:08, Alex Dumchus:

Only. Accidentally caught in the jungle. But battusov caught. There were sailboats similar to thoas or androgeus, but the treetops, even consider not happen. That's all that was of Papilio

21.10.2014 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erinnyis crameri / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erinnyis crameri / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And there are a lot of typed?

21.10.2014 21:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Endemic to the island.

21.10.2014 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euptoieta claudia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euptoieta claudia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:53, Alex Dumchus:

Let it Be !

21.10.2014 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

This determined you :)))

21.10.2014 21:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euptoieta claudia (Cramer, [1775])

21.10.2014 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascalapha odorata / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callionima calliomenae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callionima calliomenae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:49, Alex Dumchus:

I killed three of them life, but were unable to catch it in a restaurant, she flew. Foreigners (oh, these "green") sounded like ...

21.10.2014 21:45, Alex Dumchus:

And what, exactly? I have no clue. What is rare?
I caught two, one not. In principle, he could catch more, but they are small, such as not paying vnimaniya.Letayut near a flowering tree. If sled.godu go, I can catch.

21.10.2014 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Libytheana terena / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Libytheana terena / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:40, Alex Dumchus:

In-minute, Lord. It's a hobby, not work- please do not confuse. And from the need to get a hobby only fun !!! Otherwise, why such a hobby ??? So easy to perceive. I, for example, all Therefore drum. I collect butterflies for yourself - a favorite.Remember the anecdote (unless, of course, Peter did not cut yourself):
- Russian rock brought two new vyvuholey (for the ignorant - a water creature), and called them "pohuhol" and "nahuhol" ... :)

21.10.2014 21:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Congratulations! Libytheana terena (Godart, 1819)

21.10.2014 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica monima / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica monima / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lucinia cadma / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lucinia cadma / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 21:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eunica monima (Stoll, [1782])

21.10.2014 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Manduca brontes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Manduca brontes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:30, Alex Dumchus:

Will not. This is another instance. Himself govorish- individual butterflies :)
Just at first I caught them, and then just walked, looked, photographed ....

21.10.2014 21:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lucinia cadma torrebia (Ménétriés, 1832)

21.10.2014 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The group tie.

21.10.2014 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumorpha vitis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumorpha vitis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumorpha labruscae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumorpha labruscae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyles lineata / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No problem. Alexander, the other will deal with tomorrow, huh? Now, just head thinks does not matter so far.
After shaft yesterday's accusations about my transfer to this, the unfortunate, the Far East moth. When, as a result, are right ..... I would not right for some. In principle: it was so .... And more than once. Will survive.

21.10.2014 21:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, my definition, only if it is the same instance as the unfolding of a butterfly, then it was necessary to connect them to the group. But the ragged, as a whole. If you are similarly determined that this same form, then it is your definition. :)))

21.10.2014 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascalapha odorata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2014 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ascalapha odorata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2014 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protambulyx strigilis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protambulyx strigilis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Xylophanes tersa / Vasiliy Feoktistov Xylophanes clarki / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 20:49, Alex Dumchus:

Then entogo- in clarki

21.10.2014 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, as someone else?

21.10.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes clarki / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes clarki / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He is: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/xclarki.htm admit mistakes.

21.10.2014 20:30, Alex Dumchus:

Basil and mb still Xylophanes clarki, Ramsden, 1921. It seems he is found in the Dominican Republic, and no tersa

21.10.2014 20:28, Alex Dumchus:

Xylophanes rhodocera ?

21.10.2014 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It must be, then must ..... But the trouble is that people do not always do ..... or make law, append it to myself.

21.10.2014 20:25, Alex Dumchus:

Hyles lineata ?

21.10.2014 20:21, Alex Dumchus:

Perigonia caryae (Cadiou & Rawlins, 1998)?

21.10.2014 20:16, Alex Dumchus:

Erinnyis crameri ?

21.10.2014 20:14, Alex Dumchus:

Callionima calliomenae?

21.10.2014 20:10, Alex Dumchus:

Protambulyx strigilis?

21.10.2014 20:06, Alex Dumchus:

Manduca brontes?

21.10.2014 20:00, Alex Dumchus:

Eumorpha vitis ?

21.10.2014 19:58, Alex Dumchus:

Eumorpha labruscae?

21.10.2014 19:54, Alex Dumchus:

Xylophanes tersa identified V.Feoktistov

21.10.2014 18:42, Alex Dumchus:

Anartia jatrophae

21.10.2014 18:41, Alex Dumchus:

Anartia jatrophae

21.10.2014 18:41, Alex Dumchus:

Ascalapha odorata identified A.Zhakov

21.10.2014 17:11, Peter Khramov:

The point is not to avoid a fumble, but the thing is not to sell (in the absence of documents permitting).

21.10.2014 15:29, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkTetheella fluctuosaOn RDV - subspecies isshikii Matsumura, 1921

21.10.2014 15:23, Peter Khramov:

Write possible.

21.10.2014 15:22, Peter Khramov:

Duc in the comments, it is not necessary. Just only in the specification and it ought to unsubscribe ...

21.10.2014 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ascalapha odorata

21.10.2014 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ascalapha odorata

21.10.2014 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, okay, Alexander: what could be there. We work. No offense :)

21.10.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, again we are going in a circle, some 99.9% - 50 to 50, once again read the last post of Yuri is kind of twins, but for some small differences, the author of his own kind is not recognized. :)) And he wants to believe. Now, if O. elegans train different from relegata, then we could talk about a higher percentage :)))

21.10.2014 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I bring the apologies that you yap nerves, but concerns please quietly to the cavils, and he finds fault please, if you see someone else's mistakes. We all only benefit from this, the site will win. Tougher requirements and quality will grow in all. :))

21.10.2014 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, it was her last I checked thoroughly. Why I was sure. Very upset all this, honestly admit. Let vorzderzhimsya from mutual nitpicking, eh?
P.S. Especially as we have already proved that in the transfer of this butterfly, I was right initially, at 99, 9% (this is because the genitals of a picture in nature do not get it).

21.10.2014 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have something not found. Head bad now understands.

21.10.2014 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

But the fact that he appeared in 40 regions, it is interesting.

21.10.2014 12:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula eunupta.

21.10.2014 12:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

21.10.2014 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

And why do it if it is there in the blue, and the site has?

21.10.2014 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very sorry, Basil, do not you see, the dispute was correct, the actions taken to identify the species of the best. Everybody is happy, all thanks. :) That would be so for other species, without haste and thoroughly. I understand that a utopia, but really want :)

21.10.2014 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

View new, wait with the creation. It is necessary to clarify and then do it.

21.10.2014 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And she is in the exact, since yesterday. And I do not see the point in this zatevanii, yesterday's debate.

21.10.2014 11:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula eunupta Vasilenko, 1998 Identified Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS.

21.10.2014 11:51, Irina Nikulina:

Only now with a clear conscience can be put into precise. Eugene A. Thank you.

21.10.2014 11:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Heartily. Thank you, Yuri. It's like just what we wanted to prove :) At least now I have a clear conscience .......

21.10.2014 11:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Answer Belyaev. Butterfly Ira picked correctly, ie the picture really Operophtera relegata. Regarding O. elegans, it is highly visually similar to O. relegata, determined only by the genitalia. There are some minor differences, but on a picture of them say, the view is very rare

21.10.2014 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

! Important! If you know the subspecies or shape, or even any deviation from the nominative, shown in the photo butterfly, I want to ask, but what to write the name in the comments, and even write it directly in the field : "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age).For example, the light shape or third instar larvae: " (in the form of so called boot). Or, at least, would put an end to this field to moderators might then this subspecies or edit the form as it should be :)

21.10.2014 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas amphichloe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas amphichloe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

21.10.2014 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I found the same specimens. (luckily I was in the bins), photographed and replaced. For history, the history :)
P.S. Top Brand "killed", so I see no reason to download it :)

21.10.2014 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, for your reference. That, incidentally, is a very good project: http://insects.oeb.harvard.edu/etypes/Downloads.htm
Unfortunately: it seems stalled (And with a seven 64-bit buggy works for me and Win 7, Win Vista general as recognizes: general's seven did not even know :) The link distribution is not downloaded, but I have and I can send, if necessary .

21.10.2014 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When a literal translation from Latin, via Google-modern interpreter at all sooooo "merry" scoop :)
And in fact, it makes sense to come up with this name: http://roman_law_la_ru.academic.ru/3578/hilaris (Latin was the Romans).

21.10.2014 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, Respect :) Just ask her photo with ET, when lecturing her from Moscow: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/34159 and it will appear. We have the Far East "gift" is also seen caught on fast and occurs regularly in the fall.

21.10.2014 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No one was cheated :) came later.

21.10.2014 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A lot more bugs me ......... :)
It must be somewhere, just to warn people that CITES does not roamed.
I myself, though the latter have sinned beetle (Rosalia alpine): "Included in the Red Book of Russia (II category), is listed in the IUCN Red List, 96, the European Red List, Annex 2 of the Berne Convention.Protected nature reserves in the Caucasus, Teberdinsky, Zhigulevskaya and Shulgan-Tash. " But, I think, I do not worry: it is full of photos without my network :)

21.10.2014 8:12, Alexander Belousov:

And me !!! I want also.

21.10.2014 8:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kricogonia lyside / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 8:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kricogonia lyside / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

21.10.2014 8:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Same with subspecies: we must finish.

21.10.2014 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 8:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia hierta / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia hierta / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus gilippus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to finish the subspecies, where it is necessary.

21.10.2014 8:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus gilippus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.10.2014 7:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Larerannis orthogrammaria / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

21.10.2014 7:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, the first parent in the region, male.

21.10.2014 7:50, Alexander Belousov:

I do not remember where, but came across Russian name - Scoop fun. It is necessary to make or not?

21.10.2014 2:40, Irina Nikulina:

Larerannis orthogrammaria ?

21.10.2014 1:44, Yuri Semejkin:

The file is transferred to Belyaev.

20.10.2014 22:03, Peter Khramov:

Super. Boom see who else will be tightened.

20.10.2014 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

20.10.2014 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

20.10.2014 21:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia hierta / underside with all normal

20.10.2014 21:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

20.10.2014 21:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Kricogonia lyside (Godart, 1819)

20.10.2014 21:16, Alex Dumchus:

Anartia jatrophae saturata Staudinger, [1885]

20.10.2014 21:16, Alex Dumchus:

Anartia jatrophae saturata Staudinger, [1885]

20.10.2014 21:12, Alex Dumchus:

Hamadryas amphichloe diasia (Fruhstorfer, 1916)

20.10.2014 21:11, Alex Dumchus:

Hamadryas amphichloe diasia (Fruhstorfer, 1916), it is found only on the island

20.10.2014 21:09, Alex Dumchus:

Danaus gilippus cleothera (Godart, 1819)

20.10.2014 21:04, Alex Dumchus:

Similar to Danaus gilippus, only lighter. MB subspecies what?

20.10.2014 21:00, Alexander Belousov:

It seems that the female, but I doubt it.

20.10.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add: moderator should trust such trusted users like you, Irina. Whereupon, otklanivayus of debate: the more I do here, obviously nothing.

20.10.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

About clarify the meaning of citing:
" NO - according to the literature (Kurentsovskie reading) relegata in Primorye usual, is more common. For example, in one of the reports, on 7 collection points 9 copies. relegata against 2 elegans . " So, what style (in capital letters) recruited, what I have highlighted in bold, usually it sounds like a statement. No offense :)

20.10.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course, this is a whole :)

20.10.2014 18:37, Peter Khramov:

In one click more but now any Fautua a whole lot easier to edit ...

20.10.2014 18:33, Alex Dumchus:

What, Basil, and I probably have to be put to the underside bezyspodnym?

20.10.2014 18:31, Irina Nikulina:

These things - where to transfer, in the exact or not - decides moderator. I wrote about his doubts minimal and justified them. Recommend moderating further action is absolutely necessary, I think. The point of citing unclear.

20.10.2014 18:30, Alex Dumchus:

I got it. Should have warned me. Before it was more convenient, you come to the page photos immediately redaktiruesh.

20.10.2014 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Such things are worth writing immediately, and not after the transfer:
"20.10.2014 16:16, Irina Nikulina: Sorry, do not have a computer has) The answer is - there is little doubt this, or minimal) Of course, other types of scanned or on one site, before you write, and do it always. Relegata seen before, a lot of it in the network, wrote, and Yuri is very typical specimens.All the characteristics of the form there. Why still minimal doubt - images Operophtera elegans Beljaev, 1996 the network has not found yet more ready to look), but - according to the literature (Kurentsovskie reading) relegata common in Primorye, is more common. For example, in one of the reports, on 7 collection points 9 copies. relegata against 2 elegans.Basil, a reference to jpmoth optional, I always start him on the DV-species. Uchtu, will she give references when determining a hurry, time is short. "

20.10.2014 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have it in the LC, at the moment. It is called: "number of other pictures of the same individual" :)

20.10.2014 18:24, Alex Dumchus:

Ay !!! Peter Basil. Where the window is Delhi? Today I begin to spread to the Dominican underside.

20.10.2014 18:21, Alex Dumchus:

Where the window its own, to tie the underside?

20.10.2014 18:21, Irina Nikulina:

What absolutely agree with is the fact that to carry into accurate if "behind" is looming at least one kind of unreviewed, do not. Even if minimal doubt) wanted here just to write about it, but refrained) instead threw in Agent Jure wish to ask about the type of E.A.Belyaeva elegans, it would be very interesting to see.A fagata nothing to do with, I realized that Alexander was simply talking about the difficulty in determining the nature of even European species, to say nothing of the DV)

20.10.2014 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander. It seems that the same subspecies that I have male :)

20.10.2014 18:20, Alex Dumchus:

I do not understand, Where did the window on the links on truck type ???

20.10.2014 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But this is clearly not fagata :) And why, do you think I did not check before the transfer? In the tropics, the way everything is not as smooth as you think you are mistaken. For example, if you take my Eupterote sp. http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33244 Large butterfly and pretty spectacular, but I was not looking for it, and have not found so-far :)

20.10.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would not stand so boldly (which I from harm contradict :))) view from the kind where two European species, featuring many really can not. Do not like the other three ET on Japanese site where the images are not so much.I agree with Irina that fits very well in the form relegata, but behind elegans, obviously someone's double, just before the end of the twentieth century was incognito :) Belyaev, if I'm not mistaken, Yuri sometimes determines that its "krestrnika" learns or say no. Then, with a clear conscience, and could move.It is not the tropics, which is on the site and to identify similar images, here it is certainly Palearctic careful desirable. :))

20.10.2014 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ptilophora jezoensis / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

20.10.2014 16:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

DV I do not know, just suggested, just in case :) We, just only plyumigera, and then, on the personal data it has been found in the Ministry of Defense for the first time, approx. 6 years ago :)

20.10.2014 16:41, Irina Nikulina:

Peter wanted to finish, in less than half an hour more, "Edit" button there. But the editing did not work (I tried 5 times) is appended here - in other species (at the same collection points) - 7 and 4 copies.

20.10.2014 16:39, Irina Nikulina:

What kind of did not write them is really only 2? Ptilophora jezoensis

20.10.2014 16:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Operophtera relegata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.10.2014 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I believe the reasons for the transfer convincing enough. Goes to Operophtera relegata :)

20.10.2014 16:16, Irina Nikulina:

Sorry, no companies have been) The answer is - there is little doubt this, or minimal) Of course, other types of scanned or on one site, before writing, and doing it always. Relegata seen before, a lot of it in the network, wrote, and Yuri is very typical specimens. All the characteristics of the form there.Why still minimal doubt - images Operophtera elegans Beljaev, 1996 the network has not found yet more ready to look), but - according to the literature (Kurentsovskie reading) relegata common in Primorye, is more common. For example, in one of the reports, on 7 collection points 9 copies. relegata against 2 elegans. Basil, a reference to jpmoth optional, I always start him on the DV-species.Uchtu, will she give references when determining a hurry, time is short.

20.10.2014 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ptilophora sp., "Boy", if I am not mistaken. In the Far East and our two species P. plumigera there.

20.10.2014 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to complete the formation of the form. We got my hands underside sfotat finally :)

20.10.2014 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I still share the common access to the collection, in addition to 4 photos (3 of them CITES). Peter, where I had turned 16 pages and can not imagine how then underside to add, and yet so far only imported sent there. And then, just what is on the site at the moment. But still there go Palaearctic. And the real collection, is far from an end ...Horror :)

20.10.2014 15:39, Peter Khramov:

We discussed on the phone, why you need to leave. Accordingly, while the reserve. If someone else will be some questions about the removal of his photographs (author asked to leave, and I did not immediately deleted), it is necessary to pronounce these questions (preferably in the phone) when I enumerated the reasons the author will be not enough, then I foty deleted. Iethe last word of a photographer, but before that the last word is necessary to listen to my arguments, how much in the picture to remove undesirable.

20.10.2014 15:37, Peter Khramov:

With Basil discussed on the phone, where I prescribe for a common understanding:
If the author insists, I, of itself, delete the photo / photos.But if the first signal is not deleted, and he wrote, saying, if still hung, then, for this is the cause and, if the author really ought Fautua still carry, it is necessary to simply the matter with me to discuss - I'll tell you why I would like these foty leave and, if the photographer does not outweigh these arguments, then delete the pictures. No problem.

20.10.2014 15:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

One-same question (about the count of. Species) and I wanted to ask: http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentiinae/Operophtera_relegata.html

20.10.2014 15:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, there are four species of the genus, no doubt?

20.10.2014 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He added underside and the top replaced.

20.10.2014 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.10.2014 14:52, Irina Nikulina:

Operophtera relegata, not just on the network saw it in the fall, as well as our brumata c fagata

20.10.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Replaced photos top and underside added.

20.10.2014 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well done, that nobody will twitched with this, in fact, a trifling matter.

20.10.2014 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to remove and everything and no geography should not be changed. This male: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33930 catching me, personally, to the same position, only a day later and was originally in the best condition.

20.10.2014 13:51, Peter Khramov:

If it would have been solved to the author, that the author had the opportunity to direct disposal. Negotiate the situation with fotami with numbers less than 5,000 and 10,000 for Skype ...

20.10.2014 13:50, Peter Khramov:

I am not against such rights for all photographers. Simple interface is not ready for the time being.

20.10.2014 13:47, Peter Khramov:

Replace this photo with a new image. Although various specimens, in this case it would be better than the deletion. And if you need to change something in the notes / geography, then just change at the same time, that's all.

20.10.2014 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, the same photo is removed quickly and without objection, at the request of the author, as it has done today, in the morning with Udea, exposed yesterday. I'm among, other things I wanted to write an opinion out there, but not in time: deleted very quickly and without question .....Why, then, that the species can not during the day to determine the only 2 people, the undisputed grounds for immediate removal of the photo? So I find myself the right to demand to remove from your photos that they want. Without further discussion ...

20.10.2014 13:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I wrote that the course may ask to remove the photo, but the administrator can for some "higher reasons" to leave them. With those who belong to the photo, I did not even dare to discuss, perhaps the author, here you are right.but sending photos author gives consent to a demonstration site and here: "images posted in the gallery and / or used as illustrations for the descriptions and the articles belong to their authors and published on the website Lepidoptera.ru with their consent." neither of which is not said about the opportunity to refuse consent (here Peter defect).And imagine that the author put on the site a large number, and then remove it to clean a lot of work, imagine an illustration in the book, the author has given, and then paint my pictures. :)))

20.10.2014 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I return the question. No emoticons ... And unless the author can not be asked to remove your photos? Up to delete all photos? For some reasons known to him alone? Do not they become saytovskimi, in any case, and shall remain the property of the author. While he was alive, at least.There is already an administrator must listen, especially to the author. Even if the author asks to delete all photos, including your account.
PSU me, by the way, even has "lost" photos on the site that have been removed, at one time, without my knowledge (always keep the originals in separate folders and in control) ...So it must be done?
This is in case there are any questions ...... these or should not be, I think.
Sorry for being straightforward. I think that everything should be fair.

20.10.2014 11:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I apologize :)) is in no way want to offend or run down, just explaining their point of view. Do not expose the bad (low-quality photos, substandard butterfly substandard angles strange definition), which would then not have to be changed. Photos on the site have become saytovskimi, retaining authorship.The administrator can listen to the author, or maybe. of the top reasons :))) have excellent views of the author of the photo. Displays only high-quality photos (if it is not the first photo of the form (but here, too, it is desirable quality), which will not have any idea when removed.

20.10.2014 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Raises questions. Or give me the right to independently edit their own group, if made a mistake.

20.10.2014 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del. It's up to the author.
P.S. If necessary, explain intelligibly why I agreed with them.

20.10.2014 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del. It's up to the author.

20.10.2014 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del. It's up to the author.

20.10.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del. It's up to the author.

20.10.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del. It's up to the author.

20.10.2014 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del. definitely.

20.10.2014 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

20.10.2014 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diarsia ruficauda / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.10.2014 1:18, Irina Nikulina:

Diarsia ruficaudahttp://rin.upgrade12.net/archives/2976/ found the same)) On RDV only in Primorye and lives

19.10.2014 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aventiola pusilla / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2014 22:06, Irina Nikulina:

Aventiola pusilla

19.10.2014 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ghoria gigantea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.10.2014 14:44, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, thank you very much for defining refinement! So, picturedGhoria gigantea

19.10.2014 14:25, Basil Sergienko:

gigantea with a yellow head, collitoides- black (sm.sayt lishaynitsy Russia and neighboring countries Dubatolov)

19.10.2014 13:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Il! I do not have this family.

19.10.2014 12:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris affinatana / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

19.10.2014 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Conistra erythrocephala / Zoran Bozovic Conistra vaccinii / Basil Sergienko.

19.10.2014 11:41, Irina Nikulina:

Ghoria collitoides, probably. But there is apparently a very similar kind ofGhoria gigantea. Both types of litas. data found in Primorye. The size of adults does not differ according to the Japanese site. The image in the network tend to first. How to reliably distinguish between them and whether it is in appearance, I do not know. Ure, may be at the determinant look, I do not have all the volumes, Erebidae not.

19.10.2014 11:37, Irina Nikulina:

Yesterday, too, it stopped on affinatana, left in the morning) They are very volatile, so that the wings can be shaped at a summer shades.

19.10.2014 9:44, Basil Sergienko:

It vaccinii

19.10.2014 6:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Acleris affinatana (Snellen, 1883)? Type 2 is represented by major seasonal forms. Judging by the time of shooting can be attributed to the form of wintering A. affinatana f. pryerana Wlsm. Confused by the following: In the lane. KRL. wintering forms should be clear dark costal spot, but I do not see him.
Another option - lived to the Mid-Autumn summer form A. a. affinatana Snell. In this form the costal spot is not, or it is expressed very weakly.True wings should be yellow.

19.10.2014 4:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I'm moving away from the subject (wildly sorry for it), I decided to give people photo pretty rare and beautiful,
Mining, European-looking "AlpiyskogoUsacha" in my collection :)
Rosalia alpina LeConte, 1852 : https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Альпийский_усач

A copy of the mountain Large Yamantau (1640 m), in Bashkiria, catching the summer of 2011. Full label data not cite.This is just for the beauty :)

19.10.2014 3:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, okay, Peter, is in my opinion, should have left a history :)
Shamil, once again weevils not my group: for it is better to turn to molbiol, the definition of beetles. Ilya Zabaluev (aka Mantispid), I think this issue will help :)
Svetlana, and here you have a very pleasant for me the beetle from one of my favorite families: "Beetles - lumberjacks" or "barbel": Cerambycidae, subfamily. Lamiinae. Batocera victoriana Thomson, 1857 . Distributed in northeastern India (Assam), Vietnam, Laos, Malaysia, Borneo, Indonesia (Sumatra), Philippines (Palawan, Leyte, Mindanao).
Nadeyusya, people will forgive me that I write about beetles. Just always happy to tell if I know :)

19.10.2014 1:01, Peter Khramov:

Basil, all your notes are taken to work or have already been implemented. And I do leave the binding for all taxa, even better than a single field. So everything seems to be OK.

18.10.2014 23:51, Svetlana Shchavelina:

I also have bugs in the photo ... a little, but there ....

18.10.2014 21:59, Shamil Murtazin:

I also have bugs. Only the pictures :)

18.10.2014 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, another found today :) Just my luck to them ..... I will not expose yet :)

18.10.2014 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill normal discussion went along with the removal. I, by the way with four in the morning in Moscow today section tested, so bugs and identify possible troubles, and on this basis to give their comments and suggestions :) At the end of it all to participate in this section by default we humans long ago or recently, leading entomological collection.And on this basis, perhaps some baggage accumulated in the mind of these people. No offense :)

18.10.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter is unfolding butterfly, which is shown here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4301 must be linked to the group. I, again, it is impossible to relate in any way (

18.10.2014 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, daring, please This photo from the group. This is not the caterpillar, from which is derived a butterfly. Something I'm confused with these historical photos (Who podtseplen photos, which should be in a band, and it is necessary to remove from it.

18.10.2014 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add photo underside and the top replaced.

18.10.2014 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add photo underside and the top replaced.

18.10.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well cleaned, thank you. It does not have to do that.

18.10.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.10.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.10.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.10.2014 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.10.2014 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.10.2014 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add photo underside and the top replaced. At the same time the date has changed: now the label is specified and used to be taken from EXIF ​​camera (Georgia for a long time) (
Do not be surprised: it's just a LC from time to time in the BM divine form quote :)

18.10.2014 18:14, Irina Nikulina:

Very similar to pozhivshuyuArchips viola

18.10.2014 18:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

They happen varish male and female turns. in appearance almost impossible.

18.10.2014 18:03, Peter Khramov:

I clean the topic slightly from the already irrelevant questions. If you delete something important - reported.
Lord, according to the definition of family, has written: do civilized taxon bind to any level (even to the family, even to the tribe tie). Until then - trying to drive to add. Old. A separate field here is no better pick on it would not succeed.Here full analogy with photos .
Regarding how to say that the definition wrong, etc. - The system will do the same comments as, for example, to photographs. This is one of the closest to completing tasks.

18.10.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it all three suburban Noctua (fourth, like orbona, but it is, whether it is, then, whether it is not: in question) and looks at theNoctua fimbriatais the same story: http: // insectamo. ru / hete / 98-hete / noctuidae / 1488-noctua-fimbriata course, but variability and it is not necessary to argue here :) By the way, all three at the balcony catching: fimbriatu later and loaded, this same point :)

18.10.2014 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

I will not argue, but they are so varied in color, it seems to me, is from the evil one :)))
Females are very dark, the photos from Noctua differentiate by sex only "vskidku" :)))
The Germans do not risk :))) http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Noctua_Interposita

18.10.2014 17:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Females have lighter males and drawing a little different. Like pronuby :)
Here it is shown and males and females: http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1489-noctua-interposita

18.10.2014 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, what can we do about it: rake bins and constantly stumble :))) It is possible that even these "beasts" there exist :) And habitat at all three of the Railway one: my yard (caught on the balcony). And from the Vladimir region., Are both nearly "a swamp" (a couple of km away. Apart) :)
Total: heels already ....Prefer deliberately fished one point: it is important to the species diversity of specific places :)

18.10.2014 17:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, and you have males females defined?

18.10.2014 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

:))) But when typed a few dozen, and they will form the habit of different groups, and will be of the same type of habitat, and then all preparations will be certain types of, then we can not accurately put Railway Amphipoea species. :))) Without boiling.

18.10.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris issikii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 16:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Submitted. There is "by itself" otredaktiruesh. doc. edit trifling matter :)

18.10.2014 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Yuri, your opinion and definition Irene almost dispelled doubts. :) Stand. :))

18.10.2014 16:35, Shamil Murtazin:

It would be foolish to refuse) E-meil is in the profile.

18.10.2014 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.10.2014 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.10.2014 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.10.2014 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.10.2014 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add photo underside and the top replaced. Now I put a couple of them and that's enough. Although little here :)

18.10.2014 15:51, Yuri Semejkin:

From the 3 options presented can be discarded Acleris caerulescens, because front wings in the middle of the costal margin in this species without recess.
Remains 2 species. A. emargana and A. issikii. In both species, in the middle of the costal margin per.krl.est recess along which there is a dark color (the same in both species). However, in the first case (A. emargana), this stain does not produce any barbs and the second (A.issikii) this painting forms an obtuse undulations (3-4 obtuse teeth). Source: Keys to insects of the Russian Far East T5 h 3, page 51.
In general, I'm for option Acleris issikii Oku, 1957

18.10.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just do not hurt me hurt :) And do not think that making fun :)
Just another boy showed up in the bins and I suspect (without genital self-an unreasonably) that thereAmphipoea lucensrevealed :) not going to argue, and therefore stands in uncertain.

18.10.2014 15:06, Irina Nikulina:

Sash, too cautious, too, and looked before writing, these two. But emargana never seen such clear and thin horizontal lines are blurred. And all the revised (especially the Japanese) caerulescens white Zonke much wider. In the literature (from the review of Dubatolov tortricidae) and both types issikii caerulescens listed from Southern Primorye.

18.10.2014 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Abdomen, unfortunately, over time, it has lost much color and good that even the wings were green. A green moths expose any chemical treatment, you should not - you can make it worse (

18.10.2014 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris emargana may be necessary to be very careful, very volatile, or Acleris caerulescens such as the Far East as desirable to know who is usual who found the literature. as well as for those images that are in the net, it is very similar to A. issikii. :)))

18.10.2014 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add photo underside and the top replaced.

18.10.2014 14:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Judging by the majority of photos (though it is not known how and by whom specific) 2, I dismiss the other: because they seem to catch this one, side by side, no one does not like, though there is also determined by the pictures :). In general, the nature of the basis of your statements can not be no one even inaccurate to put :)

18.10.2014 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add photo underside and the top replaced.

18.10.2014 14:00, Irina Nikulina:

With high probabilityAcleris issikiimet several times images, including here and http://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42hamakiga http://www.jpmoth.org/Tortricidae/Tortricinae/Acleris_issikii.html .html. Perhaps, it can be inaccurate, given the number of species Acleris the RFE.

18.10.2014 13:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Natalia Demchenko.

18.10.2014 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add photo underside and the top replaced.

18.10.2014 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma cana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eucosma cana.

18.10.2014 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

18.10.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma hohenwartiana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma hohenwartiana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma hohenwartiana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

This can be any of four types :)))

18.10.2014 13:34, Irina Nikulina:

I would put to inaccurateEucosma hohenwartiana, live just these two butterflies (second today at the site set) different (I'm at it under the photos noted); it was time to consider them at night anywhere in no hurry)

18.10.2014 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So it is necessary to put inaccurate. Until a certain time :)

18.10.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, let them, then, is hanging in uncertain. These two species, by the way, the site no photos, even inaccurate.

18.10.2014 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Excuse me, comrades, I have written all the moves!" "The Twelve Chairs" - indeed, a great novel. Quotes from there, still suitable for many occasions.
In fact: I can send label templates: in Word, for A4 format (one sheet of labels many breaks) :)

18.10.2014 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

I can not distinguish between these two types of visual, here the words of the authors of photos, they have seen them live without these two types of cooking only inaccurate. :)))

18.10.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eucosma hohenwartiana / Vitaly Gumenuk Eucosma conterminana / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

I basically do not mind waiting, the question is how much? but the picture is already a matter of definition. Although all make mistakes, and Svyatoslav including :))

18.10.2014 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

From the photographs Amphipoea not determined. By female genitalia, these two species differ ok :)))

18.10.2014 13:03, Shamil Murtazin:

I really until they tabs)
And so all the moves recorded losses will not)

18.10.2014 12:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you all for the definition! )

18.10.2014 12:57, Irina Nikulina:

And here still tend toEucosma hohenwartianadue sufficiently well-defined second dark area

18.10.2014 12:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Amphipoea sp. Female genitalia, obviously unlikely, if, say something (Therefore I propose to decide where it is best to put in inaccurate :) In my opinion it is, orAmphipoea crinanensis, orAmphipoea lucens?

18.10.2014 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily find unfolded katokalu in uncertain and define it, is one thing and find inaccurately defined and to redefine completely different, what do you see that this is not the kind that is signed, or delete the author's vague, or write "misdiagnosis" my guess is something imprecise definition, this is now, whether puerpera,whether orientalis, which many consider synonymous. and when "like" - they are all alike. Clever :)) No offense :))

18.10.2014 12:47, Irina Nikulina:

Here of 2 possible options toEucosma canabow

18.10.2014 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wings I overlooked :)
So there is no other. I exhibited what I consider it necessary to put in the work and do not order :)
Now here's the puzzle, another found at: looks like another Amphipoea showed up in the bins. On one of those that exhibited unlike before. Put is in neoprene., To guess where it is better to do :)

18.10.2014 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, Alexander, it was determined at random in a different place, where are you likely do not look. And then I said, it's not NUFT and suggested. It turned out to be wrong. In this case, in imprecise and it was :)

18.10.2014 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why flying to expose? :)). Basil, here do not hesitate, dark rear fenders.

18.10.2014 12:20, Irina Nikulina:

I think it's not hohenwartiana, more like aEucosma conterminana

18.10.2014 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, "vskidku" it is not necessary to determine a mistake to replace the other :)). Catocala mainly differ normal, especially in the expanded state, except for a few doubles> puerpera-orientalis, elocata-deducta, but doubles independence is being questioned. :)))

18.10.2014 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We must still wait Svyatoslav. Or write to him at the post.

18.10.2014 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From firewood? After lёtanaya it because I doubted myself :)

18.10.2014 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.10.2014 11:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.10.2014 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

I will endure if there is no protest.

18.10.2014 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna pallens / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mythimna impura / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2014 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna pallens / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mythimna impura / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2014 11:40, Irina Nikulina:

Pandemis dumetana, I guess. The remaining 5 DV-Pandemis also checked)

18.10.2014 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that's sorted out :)

18.10.2014 11:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Unfortunately, bezetiketochnye (
These butterflies have been given to me as an inheritance, widow of the late, very good friend of mine, and just, a person close to me in spirit: http://www.paludarium.ru/mdm/terra08.htm

18.10.2014 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Catocala elocata / Vasiliy Feoktistov Catocala puerpera / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2014 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Catocala elocata / Vasiliy Feoktistov Catocala puerpera / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.10.2014 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Therefore imprecise definition: Can not do it. But, exactly, it is notCatocala nupta, initially it was in "collections" :)

18.10.2014 10:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Once again (third) ask the grouping with 32956 and 32957. Thank you.

18.10.2014 10:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Odd she somehow very different in color from the rest :)

18.10.2014 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.10.2014 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.10.2014 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.10.2014 6:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why is it not useful single field? Very useful even: at least it will be clear from what dance with further bringing to the species. There is such a thing, "Opredёlёn to sort" and it does not mean that in any way is not defined. Example: http://lepidoptera.ru/specimen/553 There had to write it in the note (that nekuzyavo).

18.10.2014 6:13, Peter Khramov:

If you change the default value, then they will have a hard to do "all visitors". The solution is the following: do export to CSV and opportunity not only to add new or edit topics but through CSV. Then you can change the template to do much faster once for a large number ekezmplyarov.A separate field - is not helpful. It is useful to be able to mount and foty instances not only species but also to any other taxa. I have this thing on the list, but there are a couple of difficulties with the implementation. But it should definitely be done.
By the time - check.

18.10.2014 4:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More useful to make a separate box to specify that the definition has been brought only to the family.
By the way, did not work the extension of the time to an hour of editing.
Pay attention to the time difference between my two posts.

18.10.2014 4:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do more to access the default exhibited no "all visitors" and "all the registered". Already procedure simply rearrange :) I, the gallery has about 1,600 photos and nearly all collectible ....

18.10.2014 3:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil not "tag", and the label. This "passport insect" in the entomological collection, and you can not lose it as well as your own :)

18.10.2014 3:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mamestra brassicae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.10.2014 3:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mamestra brassicae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.10.2014 3:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.10.2014 3:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.10.2014 3:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Inaccurate definition "vskidku." It is necessary that someone else looked.

18.10.2014 1:11, Shamil Murtazin:

Oops, tag lost ... again will determine)))

18.10.2014 0:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Picture submenu. function works.

18.10.2014 0:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Determination of photo - Vasiliy Feoktistov

18.10.2014 0:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Another question. How to tell the author that his copy of his collection is defined wrong? .. Or he should attribute - inaccurately - and you want to help him in determining? ..

17.10.2014 23:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter - counting table - perfectly. Tooltips rule.
Added two copies. Voprosets appeared. Is it possible to make a determination to the kind of example? If exactly the kind you can not specify. News for my karadrin :) (I will probably then cook)

17.10.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you.

17.10.2014 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Increased up to half an hour. Who will notice some oddities - reported.

17.10.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, come on .... Especially interesting bugs (particularly long-horned beetles and borers) :)

The mood is playful :)
But seriously, buggy and outdated Mantis already bothered order :(

17.10.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Long wanted a series of variability in males and females deliver. For now, just the batteries in the camera sat :)

17.10.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, come on :) And it will be easier to determine.

17.10.2014 22:34, Alex Dumchus:

And on povadkam- net Juno. On Hamadruas different kinds nasmotrelsya- they fly quickly, often sit on trees, while straightening the wings instead of adding them. And it flies from flower to flower, just as Juno Southeast Asia.

17.10.2014 22:28, Alex Dumchus:

I would say that this is some kind of Junonia. Here are cracking down - will give them a photo.

17.10.2014 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Unusual moment: the impression that it is a six-winged :)
Hamadryas sp.?

17.10.2014 21:22, Vladimir Deryabin:

There is speculation that this Pieris manni.
Is it so?

17.10.2014 21:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree :))

17.10.2014 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No problem.

17.10.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reason for transfer: the top line is written otherwise: "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or third instar larvae:"

17.10.2014 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.10.2014 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes tersa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.10.2014 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Celypha lacunana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

17.10.2014 20:17, Peter Khramov:

Summary: to run in all the services on the Lepidoptera, if all the rules, try with the other taxa. In the meantime, please be sculpting to a distinct state.

17.10.2014 20:08, Irina Nikulina:

Maybe it is uncertain in transfer? (other. photo of this individual is in swing.)

17.10.2014 19:01, Alex Dumchus:

Xylophanes sp

17.10.2014 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2014 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2014 18:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

17.10.2014 18:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

17.10.2014 18:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

17.10.2014 18:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

17.10.2014 17:04, Alexander Belousov:

You can still start hibernating pupae photo shoot! ;-D

17.10.2014 16:55, Peter Khramov:

And / or travel to the promised land.

17.10.2014 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing, I was already waiting for material from Malaysia and is still possible and the architect. Fiji (there more for my there was no one on site). Break through, only to have to wait :)

17.10.2014 15:46, Peter Khramov:

At first all the basic services in the run-Lepidoptera. If goes well, we'll do for zhuchistov and other entomologists. But first you need a confirmation that all is well and everything is working in demand for butterflies. For if they do not will be in demand, and the other groups of people will not be tightened. That is now the policy of the Party.

17.10.2014 15:40, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hehe .... yes the tropics, we also every day ... until March will not happen .... and Borneo - is unlikely.

17.10.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Svetlana, I'm not referring to the tropics, where every day is a holiday :)
Ypthima sp. Next, I will not take ..... Painfully lot of them and all alike :)

17.10.2014 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On-bugs would still such a thing ..... zabatsat
Beautiful and interesting bugs me ten times more than butterflies :) Anyway, the unit Coleoptera the most numerous on the earth ball at the number of species among the insects. Dreams Dreams....

I found 13 October this year the beetle. By the way, a very interesting discovery for the suburbs :)

17.10.2014 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Farewell, then really there ...)

17.10.2014 13:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Operophtera brumata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Operophtera fagata / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

17.10.2014 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, Theodore. In these two types, I always like "two pines mistaken" :)

17.10.2014 13:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Operophtera brumata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Operophtera fagata / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

17.10.2014 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well still gather a collection. At a time when most photographers butterflies in nature clearly "blown away" because of the end of the season, you can always find something to fill up the gallery.
Collect collection, gentlemen :)

17.10.2014 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.10.2014 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.10.2014 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2014 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2014 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2014 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2014 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.10.2014 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

17.10.2014 13:37, Fyodor Pudovikov:

This fagata

17.10.2014 13:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Excuse me, yesterday was no Internet ... :)

17.10.2014 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2014 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Even a country becomes, really :)
Larerannis orthogrammaria (Wehrli, 1927) initially:
"Far polisektorny Subboreal forest species." :
http://bounb.eao.ru/files/bastak/files/assets/basic-html/page114.html
Regions: # 37. Nizhne-Amur; # 40. Seashore.
A single photo of the moth from the "parent region" on the website is not (
All photos here only from Moscow (we have is a recent immigrant).Lord, "Far East" must-have to fill the gap somehow :)
Especially since (at least in Moscow), at the moment it is the flight of

16.10.2014 21:59, Peter Khramov:

Thank you for having made only access zaregalsya. Now for the part nezaregannyh section looks more attractive; -) foty be more, but this is not the first expansion that is planned. First, export, additional modes of loading point.

16.10.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Anatoly Marusov.

16.10.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Anatoly Marusov.

16.10.2014 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Anatoly Marusov.

16.10.2014 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Anatoly Marusov.

16.10.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you for editing. While exposed only access zaregalsya rating: works. More helpful to have underside and the top can be placed on the same page as the main gallery :)

16.10.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Putao I in them, and therefore I ask to check.

16.10.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Males of the species, by example, very clearly demonstrate the variability. For this reason, I think it will still be a lot of photos of these "friends" :)

16.10.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.10.2014 16:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.10.2014 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.10.2014 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.10.2014 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.10.2014 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.10.2014 14:31, Peter Khramov:

They all signed on the pop chart, plus signature. Remaining statements in the CSV-file template. If you have any questions - write / call me.

16.10.2014 14:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter saw-saw. In the evening, I will add.
While I can only say the large number of fields, and has not yet figured out what and where to drive)

16.10.2014 1:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Udea orbicentralis / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.10.2014 0:49, Peter Khramov:

Editing done. Link - in the Personal Area near the download. Please users who supervised the collection:
1. Test the whole thing for bugs.
2. Put something thread of the collections, including in open access. For people who come from afar to this section, a better understanding of what the salt.
ZYI recall that in the "Collections" everything is under your control - you can edit any of the fields and remove any items at any time.

15.10.2014 23:25, Irina Nikulina:

"Something very close" is also looking :). And from Udea nothing similar has not seen)

15.10.2014 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very similar :)))

15.10.2014 18:44, Irina Nikulina:

I reviewed all 10 LW Udea species and several species of the neighboring region. With a very high degree of confidence isUdea orbicentralis

15.10.2014 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

15.10.2014 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

15.10.2014 8:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

15.10.2014 8:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

14.10.2014 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Operophtera fagata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.10.2014 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Operophtera brumata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.10.2014 19:34, Fyodor Pudovikov:

fagata, yes

14.10.2014 19:34, Fyodor Pudovikov:

brumata, right

14.10.2014 14:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acraea violae / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

14.10.2014 13:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Acraea violae (Fabricius, 1793)

13.10.2014 21:45, Irina Nikulina:

Operophtera brumata? Is determined, taking into account specific features shown here http://www.lepiforum.de/forum.pl?md=read;id=34944 But both species in nature had not rented, so reinsured by placing question)

13.10.2014 21:45, Irina Nikulina:

Operophtera fagata ?

13.10.2014 14:35, Shamil Murtazin:

so exclusive that even the names of not :)))

13.10.2014 11:03, Peter Khramov:

About FAKov - too early, more important it becomes when a lot of information, and it can be lost. And here in three topics can be 80% of the entire description, and most importantly, no one else at all did not begin to write.
Qualifiers can only be specialized by otedlnym taxa.This is done in the "projects", and not even so primitive as to makuliney, but the primary need infa.
And so - "Catalog & Co»

13.10.2014 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, on mobiole you probably put two kinds of pictures, but as he wrote Sergienko, according to Kostiuk, these species have yet to describe, they do not have names :)
:)))

13.10.2014 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.10.2014 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.10.2014 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

13.10.2014 9:33, Alexander Belousov:

Alexander, not prosvyatite - who describes? I wanted to know where the material?

13.10.2014 8:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I myself do not know what has beguiled me yesterday. Urabotalsya ..... Or perhaps that with the most points, it is where you would normally Myrmidon fully, in all its variations :)

13.10.2014 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yesterday I was stunned when I saw Myrmidon. Then I remembered that Sunday. Now I look okay.

13.10.2014 6:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Inexcusably confused yesterday by uploading it to the Myrmidon. Corrected definition.

13.10.2014 6:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Colias myrmidone Colias hyale.

13.10.2014 6:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Colias myrmidone Colias hyale.

12.10.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That such very bright female was found in "bins Motherland" :)
I ask, of course, I'm sorry for what kind podnastavil well ...
But again: "good zheltushki not much happens" Checkered it .... :)

12.10.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.10.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.10.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.10.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.10.2014 20:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vladimir, you're right about everything. Without knowing the species is not possible to determine how many photos already have and go whether the point in the job. Angle is very bad from all sides, a butterfly on it as does not identify and plot no. Remove really is not necessary, if you want to make it an administrator. Butterfly defective out of the chrysalis.

12.10.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The season ended ..... The last butterfly (

12.10.2014 17:27, Vladimir Deryabin:

10.10.2014 16:33, Alexander Zhakov
What is interesting picture?

Despite the fact that we were going in a car, we have different interests. My interest - definition of the form (in general). And by placing the photo here, I do not know the type, I can not determine the amount of the existing picture of a butterfly on the site. This is the general case.In the case of this pair of photos amongst existing photo of this species on the site
I have not found a similar view. Of course, not all perspectives are important but I do not know anything about the necessary set of attributive features.
Sam will not be removed, so it was not like, "Well, do not!".Also I believe that junk should be as small as possible - remove one thread.

12.10.2014 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.10.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it seems to Muscovy and ended the season in 2014 (
Already departed en masse, we have become very common in recent years, CorydalisPtilophora plumigera. A track and "white flies" just around the corner ....
To commemorate this sad event, gathered last night a small series of typical autumn butterfly.
The night of 11 to 12 October 2014.Moscow Eastern Administrative District, Bogorodskoye district, the light of a lantern with DRL:

What's interesting: of the eight specimens. only one male and the other female ....
Matriarchy, however :)

11.10.2014 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

And what is a valuable point of discovery? Moscow region. More than 30 photographs and even Narofominsky area is. But even if the point is, why two photographs, one instance in this state. You please do not get me wrong, we are in the light of the new requirements, considering options for the photos, and your as an example.

11.10.2014 8:22, Alexander Belousov:

This picture is only valuable point detection, and if there is a second picture of the same beast from the same point, this "does not need a violinist (Kin-za-za)": - D

11.10.2014 2:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, my nichem.Hudozhestvennym picture will not name, piece in the sense of the rarity too. To determine - do not see any venation of the wings or the possible spurs on their feet. So, the only interest is the interest of the author, ie. determination or confirmation of determination. Then these images can be deleted.

10.10.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium xenocles / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.10.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium xenocles / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.10.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They are. I stand.

10.10.2014 16:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

What is interesting picture?

10.10.2014 12:27, Igor Sakhno:

Yes, we must try. Thanks for the consultation!

10.10.2014 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.10.2014 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.10.2014 7:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Carcharodus orientalis can be. And what aboutCarcharodus floccifera, I think the assumption is erroneous.

10.10.2014 7:20, Vladimir Deryabin:

Martin Albrecht on lepiforum.de suggested that either S.orientalis or C. floccifera. But he does not know what Carcharodus alceae I photographed in the same place (+ -250m) six days earlier. It's about intuition Alexander.

10.10.2014 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.10.2014 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.10.2014 0:02, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there are many that fits. I would like to draw attention to the fact that a person who is engaged in, for example, some thread specific wasps, is not very important to the development on the site of some other taxon. Developed - well, is not developed - perezhivayemost. Ie dependence groups from each other to be uncritical.In general, it seems, turns the project a different direction than Lepidoptera. Later I formulate if we can, at the same time, and also lay the Old Molbiol ...

09.10.2014 23:53, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Sasha, look in DV-Spilomelinae.

09.10.2014 23:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Udea some sort, or something very close.

09.10.2014 23:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is not Scoparia, is another subfamily.

09.10.2014 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.10.2014 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.10.2014 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Confuse, but there are, though not seen such great :)

09.10.2014 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.10.2014 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

09.10.2014 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.10.2014 23:18, Irina Nikulina:

I can only assume (by exception), it may,Scoparia mandschurica. On RDV only 3 species Scoparia. I did not seem to like it and ancipitella nipponalis (their images on the network is). But mandschurica not found anywhere else, maybe someone saw?

09.10.2014 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.10.2014 22:50, Shamil Murtazin:

and the concept of "my room" pre-configured profiles show pictures like a good idea to fit :)

09.10.2014 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not very often they arrive at the light, simple (
But caterpillars, often picked out of pieces of wood before. This is the first that has decided to take. In dreams female get it at drevesnitsy large and beautiful :)

09.10.2014 22:30, Peter Khramov:

Yes, IMAG is also in the gallery is not enough ...

09.10.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spots and white hefty rear kryalyah much troubled.

09.10.2014 22:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Without the underside, so be it sp., Walking is certainly Carcharodus alceae. but it is not on the grounds and by intuition, and it sometimes brings. :)))

09.10.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

09.10.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phazaca leucocera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phazaca leucocera / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.10.2014 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another Carcharodus sp. The truth in this case, one does not even hazard a guess .....

09.10.2014 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, what to do then?

09.10.2014 21:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Many letters.

09.10.2014 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This male (feathery antennae). The female antennae bristle. Browse, would rest ......

09.10.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

09.10.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.10.2014 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.10.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Basil Sergienko.

09.10.2014 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Additional explanations:
The task - to make the service (set of services) for entomologists. Not a picture book, not a forum or even a catalog, namely a set of services. Under entomologist here refers not only to the stern professor, but also people interested.
Basis around cool service - tree taxa.The initial tree is laid out on a site centrally me and includes more than one million taxa. In this tree, have the right to be errors / typos / obsolescence / glitches. Because the number is very large.The individual branches of the tree are connected curators relevant thematic groups that eliminate errors and make improvements at the level of "their" group.However, if somewhere there is a structured and more accurate infa about his band, the curator can not edit the Old hands on the site, and to ask me to carry out these operations in semi-automatic mode. And then dopilivat manually.As a result, each of the curator (and accordingly, and all users of the site) is always on hand an adequate (as possible) system.
Here - species essays / descriptions of taxa and stuff like that.
With trees connects the service to maintain entomological collections, the exchange of data, etc.
And a gallery of photos.Separately hung individual projects in the field of entomology, for which my strength and my colleagues forces programmers to create specialized software solutions. A typical example - the determinant of a group of taxa.On the side of all this is hung through commenting on anything and everything, plus the extended community with the publication of articles, reports and other.
How will even thought about some common services - is also going to add. But, as described above, the common and not necessarily limited to, more will and individual.The result each person will own customized site is under a "room" with the necessary information filling it. And filling it, he should be able to turn their hands in every way, consider adding new, etc.
In this format with TZAdministration is not very great importance, only the butterfly on the website or all insects. Since mechanisms of the most common, and as for the filling - of course, that the butterflies and stuff will not work unless there is a sufficient number of people in charge and involved. And, sincethis is a set of services, then do not worry, if for some taxa long and generally there is a curator of information on it will not be enough. No goals to close up a complete catalog of insects. There goal is to make all services for a person to bring and use their foreign niformatsiyu site no matter what team he is involved.There was no one for leafhopper, disk imaging, too, was very little for them, was a man went narpravlenie develop. Not appeared - not terrible, the service itself is still suschesvuet and works for other groups.

09.10.2014 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia ochridata / Sergei Kotov Eupithecia intricata / Basil Sergienko.

09.10.2014 17:18, Basil Sergienko:

It's definitely not ochridata, while inaccuracies intricata (for evtetsy should be shot on the top and a good resolution). Here, like, still picture of copies. He generally uninformative

09.10.2014 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first track in the gallery, however. Properly done, it took her :)
It was possible-would now be adults of ......

09.10.2014 16:30, Peter Khramov:

I would imagine this hung on the wall would be happy to ...

09.10.2014 15:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not agree, there is no concept, but the information is there, pale colored individuals (+ to rubbing), and of geography. It is this picture, I would be left in one group. :))

09.10.2014 14:37, Peter Khramov:

That's for sure.

09.10.2014 14:35, Peter Khramov:

But it is very conceptual.

09.10.2014 14:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Uninformative photos

09.10.2014 14:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I beetles pass. You can not grasp the immensity.

09.10.2014 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Now, as it should be :)
Vladimir, the future is not necessary in the column under the species name, write the name of the species, what are you doing in his office, not fixed in time and can not see the moderators.If you define the form, or you have a suggestion of his species belonging write in the "comments" are seen moderating and there is time, which is important for determining priority.

09.10.2014 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Deryabin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.10.2014 12:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Vasily probably had in mind the text of FAQ's type, with krossylkami :)
And Dmitry - something like a determinant as insektamo.

09.10.2014 12:31, Peter Khramov:

That's right, there is a beetle with all 20 will be!

09.10.2014 12:30, Peter Khramov:

Section "Entomological Collection" has long been in the Community. That section, and not the subject.
Definition - did not understand. On page foty are all determined by what else could be the definition? Ile definition without ph, the descriptions of verbal? ..

09.10.2014 10:58, Vladimir Deryabin:

Species name I put on after intercourse * .de

09.10.2014 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vladimir, you specify the name of the species is not in the box, on the Basil also defined it :), but was not sure.
Or sign you put down today after confirmation on lepiforum.de?

09.10.2014 10:51, Shamil Murtazin:

But I also began to doubt. It is necessary to introduce a two level, but we'll see.

09.10.2014 10:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carcharodus alceae / Confidently identified / Vladimir Deryabin.

09.10.2014 10:19, Vladimir Deryabin: This species is identified correctly.

09.10.2014 10:11, Fedor Ovechkin: This species is identified correctly.

09.10.2014 10:11, Fedor Ovechkin: This species is identified correctly.

09.10.2014 9:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I would definitely zabatsal, and with razdeleniem- family-clan-view

09.10.2014 9:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Here with butterflies all 10 people involved, and you're on the beetles sights !!!

09.10.2014 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Keep. To expand, it is necessary. Although, if for no other, personal reasons, that "Yandex pics" I have accumulated quite, no one is clear, except myself debris. (Any screenshots etc.). More has the idea (for a long time want to offer): it is necessary to open a new, technical section on the establishment and maintenance of entomological collections.That section, rather than a single theme, in which all the blame.
What matters is that it's all on you enough :)

09.10.2014 0:51, Peter Khramov:

Quite a long time has poreshali that ought to open access to a blog entry for all users zaregalsya. Probably with postmoderatsiey (ie moderation after publication). But in this situation need to blog in a separate subsection Communities disappears.Then correct to extend the functionality in the main sections of the Community (with the publication of pictures, videos, formatting, etc.) Then blogozapisi can be done in sections - both existing and newly added for this case. For example, long ago it suggests "Reports / impressions about the trips / expeditions." Ieall past and future blogozapisi distributed by sub-communities where they will be easier to find and comment on.
Who that thinks about it, thus expanding community without their own blog? What other areas offer besides reports?

08.10.2014 22:40, Peter Khramov:

Well Duc and beautiful. People breeders house spider - the audience is completely different site. And on this subject, too, there are some developments which-it is quite possible that this year will have something with my participation. But that is a different format than the Lepidoptera.

08.10.2014 22:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Just spiders really a lot of people at home in divorce.

08.10.2014 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Site insect + spider can not be. Maybe site arthropods. But it is possible and to reach the whole of the animal world, one must still somewhere and ottormazhivatsya, I think ...

08.10.2014 22:20, Peter Khramov:

Customization for themselves or some standard options? If the latter, I do not exactly see them at all. NARRATION examples.

08.10.2014 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, of course, is not always enough time. A couple of times, after the publication of fasting, came the idea that it is necessary to change the position of a few. And it's too late ....
Fifteen minutes is a very uzhatye framework and need to expand them. Self-other, within reasonable limits. Option: up to half an hour.

08.10.2014 21:07, Shamil Murtazin:

On removal - is understandable. I'm much more interesting question about the "customization" of hiding unwanted photos to show.

08.10.2014 21:05, Shamil Murtazin:

About spiders in vain.

08.10.2014 20:48, Peter Khramov:

Basil, the question was whether enough or not enough ...

08.10.2014 20:44, Peter Khramov:

If offhand, there will be a single site Insecta.pro, which will look about the same as the present Lepidoptera. And this very Lepidoptera include a full complement.There will be not only to individual sites on the force, but not even a single site in English - and English, and Russian versions will be on the same domain, and if possible completely synchronized. Oldest Lepidoptera addresses will automatically redirect to the new address. Spiders and ticks will not. It is only that part of the Insecta.

08.10.2014 20:38, Shamil Murtazin:

I am writing a second time - in short BSOD)))
The structure is modular, or what? ..
Ie There are sites with related names, full clones Lepidoptera functional but filling - beetles, spiders ... And there is a big portal Insecta.pro, which brings together all of this. Yes, we must not forget the spiders (bet that it will be one of the most popular "new" sites) and ticks ...And the question arises automatically synchronize changes in functionality, you will need some kind of standard query to combine all of this portal ...
Dreaming something ... can not comment further.

08.10.2014 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Once again, the only possible formulation is "brings you a picture in a gallery type something new to these criteria."
"There are no aesthetics," "only one photo" and stuff like that - it's all come to nothing lead transfusion from a sieve. Or introduces or not. All.

08.10.2014 20:30, Shamil Murtazin:

I add structural elements in his repertoire.
Since everything formalized and quite well (what the merit of Peter in the first place), it makes sense to do various "sets" of how the site will be submitted to a particular user.Naturally, there are more groups, such as viewing photos in order to identify, view photos on a geographical basis, etc.
At the same time, there will be personal, which may be configured different preferences ...Specific kits, for obvious reasons - a topic for another conversation =)
The different sets of filtering level will be different. Ie hiding from the eyes will be different pictures.
So I'm leaving for the maximum number of shots. If this does not prejudice us in the amount of disk space, the amount of base ...All the "disturbing" images, you can simply hide. Remove decided to just completely illegible picture, with the object of shooting 3 by 4 pixels.

08.10.2014 20:27, Peter Khramov:

The fact that all finishing touches that I planned, will operate equally regardless of the number of site types. The only thing that will require significant additional time - a supplement of new taxa. The rest can be poreshat for several full days, I think. Iedealing more in the filling, rather than in the administrative and technical parts.

08.10.2014 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

08.10.2014 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.10.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, my "two cents" in the subject :)
As an example, which should not be photo stay long in the gallery (especially a role in determining they have played). In extreme cases, you can leave one for each copy.
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29454
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29522
Of course, such a photo to be taken, as they contribute very definition.But after the definition should be removed.
Purely personal opinion and I hope the authors will understand me :) Well, they do not carry any aesthetics (
I add. Fully support the proposal of Irene, about the reduction of shots of the same butterfly.In my quite complete enough picture of the top and underside of the photo (if any), or a group: live butterfly + it is in the dried state.

08.10.2014 19:05, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, I know more about what a difference) Consider how best to write (or speak) all your thoughts on this)

08.10.2014 18:53, Irina Nikulina:

And here thought ...)) I have nothing against zhuchistov site and overall enthusiasm beetles and other little insects!) Itself parallel with butterflies always rented and beetles and other insects. But really I'm afraid that Peter is simply not enough for such volumes of new challenges. It seems to me, yet is not the time. It would be good if in the Lepidoptera.RU has already been cleaned up. But while there is still a lot of unfinished and planned that will require time and effort. I think it is best to do one thing and quality in full, and then you can and attach a new one.

08.10.2014 18:37, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the maximum photos of one kind - we are not going to matter whether the picture considered certain criteria, we go on, it brings you to the gallery of the form something new to these criteria. And this is a very big difference.

08.10.2014 18:33, Irina Nikulina:

The good news is, it's time to clean up the gallery) Like it or not, that person site. Given the many (and rightly so!) The above selection criteria, and almost 27 thousand. Photo gallery, the work to be difficult and colossal volume. It requires a lot of time.Almost finished finally charged eliminate flaws in illustrating species, genera, etc., in general, all supraspecific taxa. Holes and error, I hope there are no more. If you miss something, and someone will notice mistakes, please inform.Fix had a lot of browsing one by one all of the superfamily, reviewing the past month almost all the photos, so now particularly warmly welcome the forthcoming "cleansing" of the gallery)).Question - how it really will be what? After all, you need to shovel the entire gallery series, and even taking into account the geographical locations of shooting! And how many pictures (maximum) is scheduled to leave for the species in the first level? Or no restrictions would be - if only all eligible Qual-va? I think the photo different individuals need to leave, that is.a. There is absolutely identical butterflies "in the face", as well as people) Of course, talking about the qualities. photo. But a lot of pictures of one specimen taken from approximately the same angle, and you can podsokratit, even if they are all qualities., By removing part of the second level.
For its part, is ready to offer any help!

08.10.2014 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, before the hour it is necessary to increase the time (to the stock was). And then we can close the issue.
Shamil and zhuchisty site, long ago there. And even Modera 2: Evgeny Komarov and yours truly :)
Viktor Titov also zhuchist (molbiole nickname on the Dmitrich ) :) Cause it does not prevent, but rather helps. So, I think on this score nothing. We are waiting for all :)

08.10.2014 18:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Himself once took :) I like enough.
And so all "in shock" and ponder the influx zhuchistov and Hymenoptera)

08.10.2014 13:24, Peter Khramov:

Well, enough 15 minutes for editing?

08.10.2014 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ambulyx moorei / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.10.2014 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ambulyx moorei / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.10.2014 6:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.10.2014 0:33, Peter Khramov:

1. Zhuchisty entomologists and / lovers who specialize in other groups of insects like to have functionality that is available on the Lepidoptera for babochkeristov. After the appearance of the section collections - even more so.
2. Many people are passionate about both butterflies and other insects, such as beetles same.
3.Technically and ideologically butterflies on our site does not differ from the same for other naskomym (just the same on the other is not).
4. People who came to Zhuchin or another part of the site can help in babochkeristskoy.
5. Preliminary discussion with the moderators have special disadvantages revealed no idea.
6. The idea: extend to Lepidoptera.pro/Lepidoptera.ru Insecta.pro.

Strongly welcome the opinions and judgments on the issue.

08.10.2014 0:23, Peter Khramov:

Based on the discussion with the moderators:
Photos on the site will be divided into two types: photo butterflies and photo landscapes (extra).Photos of butterflies will be divided into two levels - the first (basic pictures, which are displayed everywhere) and the second (auxiliary, technical pictures that are only displayed at the touch of a button or by choosing the settings).In order to separate the photograph from the first level of the second pictures, and filtered image, which is generally better to delete the following criteria will be used:

1. The technical image quality (sharpness, size, etc.)
2. Aesthetic composes
3. Angle shemki
4. Living / pressed a copy
5. The state of the instance in the image
6.Showing typical / hallmarks of species
7. Gender
8. Subspecies / shape etc.
9. The place and time of recording
10. Step (imago / neimago)

Furthermore, it may be taken into account, someone took a shot (for beginners it is logical to make some concessions and rarely remove their pictures than shots experienced users).

Iewhen deciding whether to leave the newly loaded in the first shot at or transferred to the second question is put - and that it brings a new photo for the species? Perhaps in the photo shows a copy of the floor, for which there is no photo? Or is it all a caterpillar, and still no one track of this type of site is not? Or an interesting point? And so on.For discussion: What other attributes do you think is necessary to consider and approve whether all of those listed above?

07.10.2014 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra berbera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.10.2014 22:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra berbera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.10.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

07.10.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

07.10.2014 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.10.2014 20:51, Irina Nikulina:

Basil, my question was not why this photos without definition, and not about the authorship of the two definitions, and why all the other photos in the two types are defined in exactly?

07.10.2014 20:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

07.10.2014 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

07.10.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Closer to the habit of florida, but even inaccurate to carry not undertake. His would-set material like? A. oculea? notorious (where there is a possibility to cook). And these strangers to me, and the more trust to Sergei (about genitalia).
Fill. Thanks for the reminder, Irina. Moved the definition.Idyu, I have the honor to know personally and in his definition I have no doubts.

07.10.2014 20:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Here I am just prescribe ...

07.10.2014 20:27, Irina Nikulina:

I read the comments here and there was a question - why then all the photos on the website andDiarsia rubiandDiarsia floridastand in precisely defined? Including 2 pictures A. Ponomarev with the definition of AI Ustintseva.If everything is so hopeless, and the external differences between the two species is not present, then perhaps it would be logical to send all the photos in imprecisely defined? Or is it that they are? There seems noticeable differences http://www.lepiforum.de/2_forum.pl?md=read;id=36141, but unfortunately, I do not know German, and there are a lot of discussions lepiforume these species.

07.10.2014 20:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil that was the sense in so many photos of one track, specify the age of caterpillars molt or time :) well, and the time necessary to resolve the question :) must specify the date of capture and females from laying eggs. While the female is very ragged.

07.10.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Many will have to wipe :) I will write now and especially for their duties without geographical names collector :)
A section "Your collection" (the book of the same name) is needed, of course. We need to think over it :) And I think you also help in this.

07.10.2014 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you're on the site, and an example of a sample, the moderator and the most active participant in, and people take an example from you, and you showed them, not how to fill the label, and how to fill in all the blanks pages photos and species. And no need to write too much, :)))
How to fill the label, perhaps you can open a new topic in the help collection.

07.10.2014 20:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2014 20:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2014 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I just write so close. By the way, my bugs are in 1999, in Switzerland, in the collection of the Basel Museum of Natural History: http://www.nmb.bs.ch/
label completely written in Latin but it is necessary, of course.

07.10.2014 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is, in my opinion. And what doubt?

07.10.2014 19:47, Irina Nikulina:

MaleArchips rosana?

07.10.2014 19:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, many visitors do not know to whom this language, I gave an example, when writing a leg. and det., then write Zhakov, when Coll. objectified. the Zhakov. Why give the transcript of what should not be, do not write ♂ ♀, there are clear to all male and female. You always have to simplify the perception of information, and she can become complicated.But the terms are present, such as: an aberration, form, hybrid, ginandromorf age caterpillars. probably need.

07.10.2014 19:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I understand what you meant by priority. I agree)

07.10.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I'm used to writing simple :) Sobral / determined just does not fit me with a label (such as a label, to this come up). Maybe somewhere there to decipher these symbols. Like these: ♂ ♀. And many others ........
I fill in the leg. and det. is Latin, the international language of symbols and the main text label here has no Description for.Whether he ever written in Arabic script :)

07.10.2014 19:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, that would not flood the photo on the page, the question is: Why do you use leg. and det. on their pages? This reduction label, and if they use the surname written in Latin. On the site, there is a clear graphs: Photo, the definition of the form, time and place of the shooting / fishing. his leg. You bring people into a stupor. Whether the degree of science, or profession :))) kidding.I translate your label and it turns out:
Time and place of the shooting / fishing: 2012-07-07 00:00:00, Moscow region., Train in the evening, on the balcony gathered Feoktistov VI
How then do not look.

07.10.2014 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, and a good chance that after the road, through some time will have to degrease again and in pure gasoline. Fat can act again.
A stink any gasoline: just need to ventilate well. I, by the way, after degreasing, for the moment, Kossusy themselves and stink, as they should. Gasoline no hint :)

07.10.2014 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Yes, that's right, the data on their collections completely controlled curators.

07.10.2014 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lotuses, krasotischa, not just beautiful :) Thank you!

07.10.2014 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Arrange. Today I asked for leave from work (or rather, was sent home). I think that is normal for Skype will feel ...

07.10.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moderators, in my opinion (as moderator), this section shall not have any powers :)
Or I do not understand?

07.10.2014 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Peter! Finally agreed) While Basil replies, everything returned to normal)

07.10.2014 18:58, Irina Nikulina:

Who has two, and someone - no ..) But I'm trying to understand what had happened to the button "Pedaktirovat data photo" at all my photos from nature, because it was the same and I use it more than once! Or, now she will not be a natural?

07.10.2014 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. Just scoop sign this for me (on molbiol then put it .....

07.10.2014 18:55, Peter Khramov:

And, all I understood. There was a glitch with the edit button for natural specimens. Who is corrected, all the buttons are displayed.

07.10.2014 18:51, Irina Nikulina:

I could not resist) Though too small, without tails closer to the fall ... But such beauty in the beauty!)

07.10.2014 18:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, this time I'll be on the network, Basil, to my dostuchitsya :)) and we will arrange a conference, I hope. Since Skype I badly guided.

07.10.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina is apparently another button. Which carries the photo in the test section is now: http://lepidoptera.ru/specimen It is only where there is a photo from the collection. By The above link now there are two buttons. Yesterday was not.
Here's how it looks at the moment:

Like all fine :)

07.10.2014 18:47, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, we Basil tighten in Skype to 21.00 Moscow time. Come on then, too, and all agreed.

07.10.2014 18:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, it departed. About det. did not understand the label is not visible :)))

07.10.2014 18:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

I V.Sergienko and converges on Phazaca leucocera.

07.10.2014 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I endured it immediately after loading (05.10.2014 13:39) :) flew again? Alexander, I label det. Unknown, however :)

07.10.2014 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm saying if I was flying, then 50 to 50, even inaccurate to put impossible, but if you really need :)))

07.10.2014 18:21, Irina Nikulina:

Sash, and geography?) Also doubt, but then looked - on the 37th Reg. I do not fly cinereana

07.10.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

The imprecise, can be still an option Epinotia cinereana, if there was no option "inaccurately" would be accurate. :)))

07.10.2014 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

07.10.2014 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotia nisella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2014 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epinotia cinereana Epinotia nisella.

07.10.2014 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotia cinereana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2014 17:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Photography itself is normal, but a copy, you must see for yourself. If you would like to confirm the identification of the tracks, it is better to believe in the word, than to have this confirmation, and on both sides. I correctly understand your actions, but it does not decorate the site (but that's just my personal opinion).

07.10.2014 17:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

07.10.2014 17:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

07.10.2014 17:42, Irina Nikulina:

Epinotia nisella ?

07.10.2014 17:24, Shamil Murtazin:

This is just a reminder, if he guessed.
You do not like the photo, or the quality of unfolding? )))

07.10.2014 17:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Comment author is not correct. Nikita closet, as I understand it, on the assumption expressed by caterpillars :))) And here is an image of a butterfly. :)) And very far from perfect :(

07.10.2014 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

07.10.2014 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

07.10.2014 16:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus pascuella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.10.2014 16:52, Irina Nikulina:

Crambus pascuella

07.10.2014 16:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

And Peter, Basil, let's skype nevertheless negotiations on the photos, more and more fun at it. Maybe I carp but the criteria have not any there. I understand the 50th picture of good quality, but the 50th tattered picture, it seems to me too much. Today, at any time, if convenient. :)))

07.10.2014 16:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

And I am about this :))), although the network looked after, there are such. :))

07.10.2014 16:38, Irina Nikulina:

Such a "mockery", Sash, met for the first time)) and therefore be safe diversana have never seen such a vast dark figure)

07.10.2014 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

What fun :) missed. I apologize, I was very busy. Basil, on the issues raised on this page almost everyone agrees with Peter. As for Russian names has been debate in the moth, they are not correct. All Russian names with a lowercase letter, may consist of one, two, three or more words, and everything right.There is not no rules for naming, there are only rules of spelling and agreement of labor (the husband. Wives., Middle :))) and cases.

07.10.2014 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.10.2014 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.10.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not a moth, and mockery. :) But probably is suchChoristoneura diversana

07.10.2014 16:01, Irina Nikulina:

Do not quite understand, Peter, about the transfer to instances ... Some time ago the "Edit" I was under each photo, and they are all of my nature. And this innovation very much, especially once it was convenient to combine several. photos to the group, but all the other amendments are made, if necessary. Then the button is gone. The return is not expected?

07.10.2014 15:13, Peter Khramov:

Clear. There is some discrepancy: ph for priority setting of information (Especially for a certain type of) the moderators, and in instances - the unconditional right of the owner. Because not sure how to do it. Possibly, only the additional sync field (time / location, etc.)

07.10.2014 14:51, Peter Khramov:

The last day or two could be glitches with the new load of information on the site and the work saytovoy mail. Now everything is OK, if someone has something does not work, try today.

07.10.2014 14:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This method, of course, do not come up with Vasily. Simple gasoline stinks and Shoe odorless. And as a result edentichny.

07.10.2014 12:35, Peter Khramov:

The button is at the photos in which the property is stamped "Dried / collector's item." Foty from nature to the copies not transferred.

07.10.2014 7:54, Alexander Belousov:

I looked through your downloads with the first, under any of the two buttons - editing and "to the collection." No problem.

07.10.2014 7:06, Shamil Murtazin:

It is very "lazy" Wishlist.
If you move a photo from the main gallery in the collection, and then change the data, for example, the view was not valid, then in the collection, of course, nothing will change.
Ie have to change hands and the information in the main gallery, and in the collection.

07.10.2014 1:04, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, explain again. I do not quite understand you.

06.10.2014 23:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! So I understand that the images in the collection, and other fields are not tied to an instance in the main gallery? This refers to when it was imported from the main gallery. You can somehow synchronize or "direct" links organized? .. (Not very much a priority, but it is very convenient)

06.10.2014 22:40, Peter Khramov:

I do not just kick you. And you kick more than others because you are a moderator and because you write a lot of comments, ie, affect the site's face very much.
Appeal by an exclamation mark - this is normal. For example:
Basil! And if we do not go today for a beer?
If you meant something else, it was reported.A passive attitude to take - is zavsegda convenient. We have all it takes nation and much of the site, respectively, too. With moderator and the administrator is always a lot of demand.

06.10.2014 19:17, Alexander Belousov:

Basil, you have patience for you all set up, and there, and our collections will :-)

06.10.2014 19:06, Irina Nikulina:

Well, I probably was not so lucky) - I have the button, or not at all under one photo, even the most recently downloaded.

06.10.2014 19:05, Alexander Belousov:

Basil tested method, but gasoline was a mere 92. The result is excellent, but the smell remained.

06.10.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A similar problem.
The button is present in only relatively recently uploaded photos. There is a search for the number in the LC. In these cases, and I use them.
Here's a photo from which I have this button: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30320 order that loaded before it is not.

06.10.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just I tell you how I do it :)
It is necessary to take appropriate and sealed pot material is not afraid of the impact of such a corrosive liquid like gasoline (glass, etc.). At the bottom of the stick on the "superglue" (not afraid gasoline) piece of cork wine (it is not rzedaet gasoline). Pin stuck in a traffic jam with a butterfly, pour gasoline and Close.After some time, the butterfly transformed.

06.10.2014 18:35, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, and what had happened to the button "Edit Data Picture", the one "full of happiness"), about which you wrote above in 2 post? It was very convenient! It would be her return)

06.10.2014 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way: why just kicking me? What are the others all spelling correct? In particular: an appeal by an exclamation mark is present and thriving here. This is normal?
P.S. Scattered better subgenera (3 subgenus today opened) species of the genus Antheraea: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/572
I was there, in written forms, what to do with. This Site is better to be on the order.

06.10.2014 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is usually (though unspoken, but it is observed everywhere): many species assigned to the main Russian name of the software main food plants. For this theclinae plum plum and bramble (a kind of plum). Cutting any Soviet determinant of insects.These determinants do not fools in entomology and now it seems to me that these people are no more, alas (. That Soviet determinant name because - Russian. I'm tired, right, I do have to prove. Let them do uberёm. The Latin name is always right and irrefutable.Face site, you say? We should probably take me a passive position to a smaller kicked me in the face is the same. And then everything will normalnenko.

06.10.2014 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Replaced photos

06.10.2014 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Replaced photos

06.10.2014 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Replaced photos

06.10.2014 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Replaced photos

06.10.2014 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We will see it tomorrow, at work :) Heating included: white flies is not exactly around the corner :)

06.10.2014 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They do not want me to show this cartoon :) Apparently believe that I do not need it .......

Stop flooding.

06.10.2014 15:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I liter ready. True zazhirevshih Xyleutes also pieces 10-12 (2 types), not counting the little things. Kossid all the way from Borneo, 2 copies Xyleutes not zazhireli. Miracles.

06.10.2014 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And rightly so. Is stored, Dmitry. Especially a lot of leaves on Xyleutes: After washing a pair of gasoline, and pour the broth becomes necessary :)

06.10.2014 14:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

From 3 to 4 October began years Poecilocampa populi. Winter is coming (c).

06.10.2014 14:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nafludit here! Shoe and nothing more !!!

06.10.2014 14:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Replaced photos.

06.10.2014 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Replaced photos (copies. Pereraspravlen).

06.10.2014 13:15, Peter Khramov:

How to determine what deserves to be the object of worship, and what not? .. "Do not make yourself an idol", again, yeah ...

06.10.2014 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, okay, you're right. This plague in me says, simply :)
Now tady tropical brazhnichkov to leave (with coordinates that). The great thing is, if the underside can be placed under the same number, with the top. Well, the editing / deleting a self-necessary as air. The curator of the collection, it should be full owner.
Push.I'm happy to be honest. Thank you :)
Finalized, yet run-:)

06.10.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So, too, among the gas is a very expensive, prestigious and pleasant :)
Ronson, for example: http://www.ronson.com/en/index.php
Gasoline, incidentally, is also among them there.
And an American zippo, lighter soldier made out of "tin" (figuratively speaking). Her simple, unfairly elevated to cult objects.

06.10.2014 12:22, Peter Khramov:

06.10.2014 12:16, Peter Khramov:

But among them there are options that are in the hands to keep nice.

06.10.2014 12:13, Peter Khramov:

Good thing there were reviews. And thank you for the comments on the identified glitches.
Gluck transfer when there are apostrophes fishing spot - treat, can be moved safely.
Gluck when the pages were shown copies of the wrong data field - will fly. This in itself is infa based were correct, ie no changes in the properties of already downloaded copies are not necessary.Regarding the two or more illustrations - it necessary, but not in the first. Ie This feature is sure to be, but not in the next two weeks for sure.
Edit / delete the data itself, and a mandatory thing for a long time already in the process. I brake, but soon lay out.However, no timeout is, by itself, will not - you can delete and edit data on their units at any time, no one has anything without asking and without confirming.
The first version of Google Maps for point MEIS is ready, it remains only to introduce the site. Afigitelno thing has turned out even better than expected.So, too, will that look.
Export data - also already in the works, too, is expected soon.
With the amount of people online who supervise the collection, you, Basil, to put it mildly, gleaning. But that's not the point, because the hedgehog is clear that under this new section will come as tokmo it (this section) and is slightly podnapolitsya completed yet its functionality.And with regards to the "Good-only Peter listened to the wishes of practitioners" - drag the studio a thread example, when I did not listen to the wishes of practitioners.

06.10.2014 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A galosh in bottles of 0.5 liters. And there is such a bottle is much cheaper than a bottle of scanty gasoline lighter :)
Peter, I'm a heavy smoker, and therefore I can say that the lighter zippo, is a show-off, and nothing more.

06.10.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, God bless them :) The bottom line did not change. Thumbsucker hyphens arrange simple.

06.10.2014 11:49, Peter Khramov:

Cut the hyphens.

06.10.2014 11:48, Peter Khramov:

But Zippy in cool cans! And anyway, no gas is lighter juzat.

06.10.2014 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

ZIPPO - money down the drain :) Besides it there contain oily contaminants to escape from the lower gasoline lighters.
Domestic "Galosha" is gasoline, which is specifically designed for cleaning and degreasing. Therefore it is necessary to use it. By the same it costs much cheaper than zazhigalochny. A lot of fuel is necessary for these purposes.

06.10.2014 11:35, Peter Khramov:

Beauty.

06.10.2014 11:34, Peter Khramov:

Like zazhigalochny still recommend, even though he did not try.

06.10.2014 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if there was an option inaccurate females, then it would be postponed. Visual perception can still depend on the angle and, therefore, is to err in this case. Why about the top and I asked the females never have the blue / purple tint.

06.10.2014 11:16, Peter Khramov:

If compliance can not be traced, then it is a negative literature.
It is not hanging instead, at the same time. And we need to look not only in the direction of current transfers, but also towards the new people that these transfers could do. And so, once again the face of the site and all the cases.
There are no rules when prisovenii Russian names do not exist.And what about the small letters - a young man, keep it up!)

06.10.2014 11:12, Peter Khramov:

Oh, Basil, so tearful mood, but here you are still added ...

06.10.2014 10:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I Borneo lies a mattress, "pieces of fat." In winter I will degrease.

06.10.2014 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis ino / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

06.10.2014 10:10, Fyodor Pudovikov:

ino

06.10.2014 9:48, Elvir Izmailov:

So the opportunity to photograph themselves on all sides they do not fly away.

06.10.2014 0:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No league, AFRA and jellyfish, for sure. And the remaining 2 euryale aethiops. Closer, in my view the second.
Irina, the view is?

06.10.2014 0:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I am pretending and suffered.

06.10.2014 0:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Actias rhodopneuma / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.10.2014 0:42, Irina Nikulina:

Catalog - reg. 10 - genus Erebia. Result - aethiops, afra, euryale, medusa, ligea

06.10.2014 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"On the court there is no" :) But in reality, determined without underside of perlamutrovok - "guesswork" ....
Brenthis ino? Brenthis daphne? .....

05.10.2014 23:35, Elvir Izmailov:

no

05.10.2014 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Elvir, photo underside hour there?

05.10.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Erebia aethiops? While I can not stand, I do not know who else may be like her.

05.10.2014 20:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Shamil. And that's not very much (for C. cossus), zazhirenny. I have my zazhirivalis successfully from 2003 to 2012, when I bothered to wash them: all were afraid to look (
Cossidae zazhirivayutsya all, without exception. And clean gasoline "Galosha" helps if to hold it for a week."Bathing" should have straightened material, or after not spread gasoline (petrol strongly of stale insect).
Important: ! In no case can not use gasoline: you only need to clean, without impurities!

05.10.2014 20:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil looks so clean copy without gasoline?

05.10.2014 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.10.2014 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acria emarginella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

05.10.2014 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Irina, and a link for confirmation. Now you can easily transfer, with a clear conscience :)

05.10.2014 19:34, Irina Nikulina:

On WFD lives of all 3 types of family Peleopodidae, and only one - of the genus Acria, as already said Yuri. http://izumoga.com/saninmoth/ooegurihiratamaruhakibaga.htm

05.10.2014 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturnia pavonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.10.2014 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

05.10.2014 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

05.10.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reaffirmation necessary. I, ET I do not know and therefore can not stand, and Alexander somewhere zapropastilsya again (.
Validate - bear no questions asked.

05.10.2014 13:57, Yuri Semejkin:

And that can not stand? We have two kinds of them, each one meant.

05.10.2014 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

05.10.2014 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

05.10.2014 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

05.10.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sad .. But nothing is to be done. It is destined to remain in the imago: May until better times, and maybe forever (

05.10.2014 12:31, Irina Nikulina:

I do not have a picture of the top, and see when fly away, too, did not work - sitting high above the river

05.10.2014 11:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Acria emarginella (Donovan, 1806) According to the insects of the Far East in this way one species is found in the Far East (str.491)
Rhode Letogenes not suitable.

05.10.2014 8:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Further plans to substitute these pictures gusyanok ...

05.10.2014 8:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! I tried to transfer from the general picture. Questions from the floor option, which appears as a "male" if anything before that has not been specified.
Plus really looking forward to editing. For even a bit cautious in the collection of the information necessary to write - is not removed and can not be corrected later :)
Well, there was a bun to reverse export.For there to add "external" elements, which are on your computer may not be.
Thank you! =)

05.10.2014 8:27, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you, Basil! But this is not the first butterfly. =) Though it turned out a little crooked. Gentle it kind of too much or pererazmochil ...
I will carry the collection here. But the question about the editing of the collection appeared .... How? =)

05.10.2014 8:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I have found the cause of outrage described in my post on the 04.10.2014 14:45 .
Photography is not copied to the "Collections" because of geography, English language, and if it contains the geographical coordinates. Deal with it, please.

05.10.2014 7:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to remove this image. I did not intend to. Uploaded best photo underside, another male from this same area.

05.10.2014 7:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina was the blue tide, whether it has copies., The top? On the contour, such as female, but you need to check.

05.10.2014 7:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

05.10.2014 7:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

05.10.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.10.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in males. A fragment of a wing belongs to the male.

05.10.2014 7:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 6:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.10.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 6:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 1:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did not dare to put it in the exact ...... And for obvious reasons :)
I will ask to confirm or deny.

05.10.2014 1:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, it is the only one in the family. Therefore, you can immediately into accurate :)

05.10.2014 1:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.10.2014 1:17, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, you need to divide this group of 5 photos of 4 different species

05.10.2014 0:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I afford to clarify the geography of the picture. It would be superfluous in this case. Moscow is a metropolis, one of the largest in the world :)

05.10.2014 0:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.10.2014 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.10.2014 0:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.10.2014 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.10.2014 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that's the Vladimir region on the geography of the form to help :)

04.10.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

04.10.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UPD. Done. At the same time span and formalized.

04.10.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

An interesting aberration.
And, importantly, it has a name: Apatura iris f. iole (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) .
Too bad the photo is not clickable and you can not finish in the top row (

04.10.2014 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I uploaded underside and replaced the top: work on the bugs.
Good to have a collection that is going to for decades. You can always find the right instance. It is already 18 years passed. Butterflies in nature so do not live :)

04.10.2014 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Later, I add the source and transferred Old. This is me as an example and led to consult :)
Well, on this occasion, to make a "two dogs" on the main page of the form. However, I not tried it yet. Can they work there?

04.10.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Upload a photo underside and changed over.

04.10.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Tentatively identified Xestia c-nigrum / Confidently identified.

04.10.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.10.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.10.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina Xestia c-nigrum.

04.10.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina Xestia c-nigrum.

04.10.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina Xestia c-nigrum.

04.10.2014 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina Xestia c-nigrum.

04.10.2014 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, now the question can be removed. On the initiative in raspravke Shamil :)

04.10.2014 21:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Xestia c-nigrum?

04.10.2014 21:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Xestia c-nigrum?

04.10.2014 21:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Xestia c-nigrum?

04.10.2014 21:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Xestia c-nigrum?

04.10.2014 21:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Xestia c-nigrum?

04.10.2014 21:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Xestia c-nigrum?

04.10.2014 21:06, Peter Khramov:

Essno necessary. It is unclear what this information generally does page image, rather than on the page type.

04.10.2014 21:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! Please see - when you send the collection machine writes that the male. Nowhere is this is not specified! Default see =)

04.10.2014 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From related speciesApatura irisunderside differs in the following features:
"The underside of the rear wings are brownish with a violet hue, purple sash dirty".
Verbatim quote from here:
BM Mamaev LN Medvedev FN Pravdin "to the insects of the European part of the USSR"
Moscow, "Education" 1976

04.10.2014 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From related speciesApatura irismajor differences on top of the following:
"Grasp the rear wings slightly curved, with no angular projection".
Verbatim quote from here:
BM Mamaev LN Medvedev FN Pravdin "to the insects of the European part of the USSR"
Moscow, "Education" 1976

04.10.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From related speciesApatura iliaunderside differs in the following features:
"The underside of the rear wings reddish-brown with purple tint and white band"
Verbatim quote from here:
BM Mamaev LN Medvedev FN Pravdin "to the insects of the European part of the USSR"
Moscow, "Education" 1976

04.10.2014 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From related speciesApatura iliamajor differences on top of the following:
"The rear wing with almost straight white band in the middle protruding tooth".
Verbatim quote from here:
BM Mamaev LN Medvedev FNPravdin "to the insects of the European part of the USSR"
Moscow, "Education" 1976
Now I add distinction and underside :)
I do not know is whether the add-in such determinants sources to then refer to them by the addition of information on the form? He sees fit.

04.10.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I'll write with a capital letter, if it is the main theme of the site. Unless the name is not on the beginning of a sentence :) I think this option will suit all.
For Fedor Ovechkin: under the "Butterfly is not a thing" I mean once again the name of the species.As, however, and people too, not a thing, and From Biological species of animal and should also be written with a capital letter: Homo sapiens (Homo sapiens) :) Enough of this. The site is full of more important and relevant cases than that. In general, it is unclear as to entomological site in the "Picture comments" can hang more than a day is the verbiage in the first place.Specifically, with the 02.10.2014 21:30 for 04.10.2014 15:55 : to the point where here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33760 I was asked the issue on the merits. Here, first of all must be other comment. About determining the types of the photos, for example, and on their transfer at the place of moderators, etc., etc. :)

04.10.2014 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, right in the same vein of thought (see. My question №2) :) Well, only Peter listened to the wishes of practitioners. We are here because not many: entomologists, exhibit material from their own collections.I can list: Dmitry Pozhogin Alexander Dumchus, You and I (though to me not the main direction associated with butterflies, I zhuchist and a collection for the most part I "Zhuchin"). Perhaps it's the people at the moment that can make suggestions on the issue. We need to develop this section of their modest efforts.
Remaining authors site: closeup.The matter is also required, but these people entomological collections usually do not lead, and therefore nothing to say on this subject can not.

04.10.2014 17:21, Alexander Belousov:

Question. And you can edit the information in my collection? I did not immediately want to enter all the data, but gradually, and then supplement. For example, first foty throw, and then gradually introduce the label.

04.10.2014 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I stick at an angle, and all the glass to hold. On both sides.

04.10.2014 15:55, Igor Sakhno:

And how did you attach any raspravilke glass, bent pins?

04.10.2014 14:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another bug: Unable to send to individual photos. In particular: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/24020
Write something, he writes that: "In the collection is created with a new instance of the data attached to it photos from this page" , but in reality, under the collection, nothing happens.

04.10.2014 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here are just copied the pointed top and underside of copies .: http: // lepidoptera.ru / specimen
It happens, Peter, I'm constantly testing all of these innovations are the first: the transfer of photos, pictures in his replacement Luke, and now the collection and division :) And so the first question and wishes :)
1) It would be desirable,to be able to copy photos underside and the top photo on one page / number: it underside is no less (if not more important, in many cases) than the top.If this is not a fantasy, of course :)
2) Do-it possible to edit the data (or make the "Special Notes"), or remove each page independently curator of the collection?
P.S. At this point in my LC does not open the link Loading collectible copies of one , would have to be corrected.

04.10.2014 12:29, Peter Khramov:

If it suddenly obvious, but now the work is going on algorithm 1 phot = 1 copy. Therefore, to copy a few photons in a single individual collections do not need - they will be marked as different instances, there is wrong.
Export - meaning the data from the site to their computer?

04.10.2014 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I understand that we must also work on the main theme of the website, in addition to discussing how and what to write. Of course, grammar is good, and in this respect there are certain rules in the Russian language. However, compliance with these rules, alas, not seen in the biological literature (which, basically, and motivated at work on the site).You yourself see what we do: the second day of hanging this debate in the first place rather than in the photos, there appeared choby comments about the definitions of butterflies in the photo (uncertain at the moment as much as in 1443) and transfers them to the species. Site Bug fact, not dedicated to grammar. Stop ....Of course, we have to work on the bugs (and not only to me, by the way). Including some errors in the Russian names. Although they are "people", but quite often, along with Latin, shared in the same present in very serious literature and assigning them the same there are certain rules. That's me on theclinae plum. It is necessary, first capitalized it has called :)

04.10.2014 9:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Cool, Peter!
A reverse export a table there?

03.10.2014 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Lead the ability to download copies of your photographs shown in the main gallery in the Galleries section. Go to page foty, if you mean by its author, and if it has stamped the property "Dried instance" under the image will now be the "Send to" Collections "." Click.The relevant section appears your copy with an illustration. In doing so, it will automatically go to the properties foty - place and date of shooting, the photographer = curator of the collection, defining, clarifying the classification, gender, the accuracy of determination. But some others will not, for example, note, becauseThey can be individual for foty for instance.
We try. Enjoy.
Basil, throw a stone in your garden. C'mon!

03.10.2014 18:51, Peter Khramov:

With TZ Russian language - torfyanikovaya. With TZ Russian names registration on the site - as you like.

03.10.2014 18:27, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Re: Those who have questions about the spelling of Russian names of species - reported.
Yeah, then another question: torfyannikovaya or torfyanikovaya yet? )

03.10.2014 16:01, Peter Khramov:

Replacing the photos only in the event that the time and place (and a copy of itself) - are the same. Well, or the differences are not significant - a couple of minutes later, half a meter to the right (if the shooting was carried out at all in nature). From collector's item and that it is easier.

03.10.2014 14:12, Fedor Ovechkin:

In pictures like the essence there are two unique properties (except Id): the place and time of shooting. These properties are associated with the image file and can have a scientific or at least informative value. Replacing the image file from the pictures as an entity will lead to irretrievable loss of these properties and replacing them with new ones.Does this fit into the concept of the website?

03.10.2014 11:30, Peter Khramov:

I explained on the page about foty names (that are in the second class, by the way). A comparison with English and Latin correctly. And I've already said many times that, because you face a moderator of the site, it is necessary to pay more attention to what and how to write.

03.10.2014 11:25, Peter Khramov:

I'm starting to kick for the spelling right in the comments, because patience ran out to kick away from them.
If it suddenly obvious that the name given does not mean, as individuals. That is if you have a favorite butterfly (living at home), and her name is Thecla, then yes, then with a capital letter. Another analogy: Basil - the name, and the person - not the name.The table you link the name with a capital letter, because This beginning of the sentence, not because it is the name of the butterfly.
Kapslok does not confirm the correct spelling with a capital letter, and the content of Red Books scolded just lazy.
As an example of the need to look, for example, on decent zoology textbooks for schools. At the same Dogiel.So:
That's right - perlamutrovka torfyannikovaya, perelivnitsa Schrenk and Elena ornithopter.
But it is wrong - Perlamutrovka torfyannikovaya, Perelivnitsa Schrenk and Elena ornithopter.
Those who have questions about the spelling of Russian names of species - reported.If at first oboratites uchebnkam to the Russian language and zoology - will be quite good.

03.10.2014 9:51, Fedor Ovechkin:

Based on your logical construction, Basil, the word "Butterfly" should be written with a capital letter, because "Butterfly - is not a thing" ... By the way, why is not the thing, if, for example, in the collection? And why write about it in the comments to the photos?

03.10.2014 5:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pёr and more about the commentary about a capital letter: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2471
There is a strong opinion, backed by the facts that the national name, be it Russian, English, Latin, etc. decided to write all over the world with a capital letter. Even if it is the middle of a phrase. It's the name of the insect, and the name as quadrupeds always written with a capital letter.Here's how to write Printo:

And come on, stop it. Frankly already got. He wrote, write and will write with a capital letter :)

03.10.2014 2:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It was always a big one. As used herein: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8466 and other species that do not I have it pointed out.
I add. The name, in this case, has a name, and the name should be written with a capital letter and no matter in what language. Butterfly is not a thing :) Not far to seek, but rather to link to the spacecraft, which is just below. There's even the name of the Russian Capps says

03.10.2014 1:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apparently her right here to stay as long as ...

03.10.2014 1:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dysaethria lilacina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

03.10.2014 1:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dysaethria lilacina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

03.10.2014 1:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe ognёvka, but if you put the wings of this picture: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30075 and look at vognuy arched upper edge of the front wing ...... Although, yes, it's dark :)

03.10.2014 1:36, Peter Khramov:

Well then, in limbo?

02.10.2014 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Shamil ready. Details in the letter.

02.10.2014 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Scattered States where Russia likely -) However, it is little to influence.

02.10.2014 22:36, Peter Khramov:

C small letters Russian name ...

02.10.2014 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

How do you express love, butterfly is very far from the habit :) Hulodes caranea and therefore can not be like that. The structure of the head in general suggests that this is a moth.

02.10.2014 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

But the quality of the butterfly wants the best :(
The defect at the exit from the pupae.

02.10.2014 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodometra sacraria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.10.2014 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is the so-called torfyannikovuyu on Russian copper-butterfly with great pleasure put in males. Painfully rare and svoebrazny this form inhabitant purely peat, horse, bogs :) In Meshchora (as elsewhere) is rare and local.
KK Moscow Region: "2nd category. Kind, a decreasing". : http://kkmo2.verhovye.ru/rb/bspozvon/plebeius_optilete.php

02.10.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That trouble is not dry up :) Everyone probably never :) Although the apartment is already material "under the ceiling" hammered .....
I think it will be a benefit to the local history museum in time :)

02.10.2014 20:59, Alexander Belousov:

Still in front, Basil! Like all dry up, You take for creativity!

02.10.2014 20:57, Alexander Belousov:

And will America in 2016, the year? Or will RSHA - Scattered States of America? Hee-hee-hee. :-)

02.10.2014 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, I join. Well ))). I just do not havataet to this: come out, dried out .... And just starve.
Prose life entomologist (
Probably devils I have long been waiting to yourself :)

02.10.2014 20:50, Alexander Belousov:

Luxury photo shoot !!!

02.10.2014 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I remember it took arms, as with anything there was no goal was not to catch butterflies .....
And now look: flies such "black sheep" among ordinary males over korostavnieom. I could not miss the moment and took his fingers, and then carried home in a cigarette pack. Since this unusual pafiyu not met even once (Nostalgia ....

02.10.2014 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, Putao cabbage rolls: not mine, alas.

02.10.2014 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

02.10.2014 20:29, Irina Nikulina:

female

02.10.2014 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 20:19, Irina Nikulina:

male

02.10.2014 20:19, Irina Nikulina:

male

02.10.2014 20:18, Irina Nikulina:

male

02.10.2014 20:18, Irina Nikulina:

male

02.10.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I took the standard for the distance between the infrared lamp to work plane raspravilki 20 centimeters. Normally dry: it is necessary only to follow. Well, it is desirable to close the wings are not plastic and substantive glasses: http://1plk.ru/index.php/production/stekla-dlya-microskopii/item/predmetnie-stekla Plastic "leads" on the temperature."Heavy artillery", but effective :)
This method is very akualen even if the material is dried in a humid environment (near the sea, etc.). I remember a long time ago for me, AnapaEpicallia villicasohla week and a half in the wild and do not dry during this time :)

02.10.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

02.10.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

02.10.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 19:09, Igor Sakhno:

Thank you very much for the information! I'll be experimenting (obviously not on oleander).

02.10.2014 19:06, Igor Sakhno:

I can identify them only two or three days before the imago as through a skin begins to show through picture and begins to show a spot on the male end of the abdomen (where the female is not).

02.10.2014 18:58, Peter Khramov:

Shtoto have so little in the smoking room. Accordingly, it is thrown.
So, despite rumors persist that went possible and even probable cancellation of the freebies, it still goes on, and once the acceptance of applications for participation in the Green Card lottery started.If someone in the tank - the US each year conduct a lottery under the theme of biodiversity, which is conducted lottery green cards (roughly speaking, the green card - a permanent minimum disqualification compared to the citizen and to acquire citizenship in the not terribly distant future).Serve to participate can any adult citizen of the country, which is not in the list of banned this year (barring those from which last year were too many come in large numbers). Participation is free. Required to fill out a short form online and upload Fautua. Nothing else is required.All offices that offer "contribute" - is an outspoken leftist. Would be correct to do everything yourself (the good instruction there, even for very wooden - in Russian).
Family members receive payoffs similar permanent green card without additional straining.
Link to the official website of the event: https: //www.dvlottery.state.gov
Deadline for this year - until November 3. The results - from May 5, 2015.
Good luck to all who will participate: -)

02.10.2014 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Godonella aestimaria / Imago / Oleg Nikolsky Ematurga atomaria / Female / Basil Sergienko.

02.10.2014 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is such a thing: the female bear :).

02.10.2014 17:33, Basil Sergienko:

It is not G.aestimaria, and E.atomaria

02.10.2014 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I will not get through, as you can call back. But here I write to all the people to the confusion in the minds of not arisen because once podnyatnoy this topic:
There is no "right" and "wrong" Russian names. Do not like what is on the site for some species, add their own, but not instead of, but in addition to.A rare exception - it is when the previous adds something completely beguiled obvious (such as hives called cabbage or something similar).

02.10.2014 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill. If makroid considered a reliable source, along with Plavilshchikov, Medvedev and others. So, yes, she too Cheremuhovo: http://macroid.ru/showgallery.php?cat=4336 Or this: http://mypets.by/ satyrium-pruni-xvostatka-cheremuxovaya
In short: it is necessary in Yandex (Russian it) two requests for dial Shape: theclinae Cheremuhovo theclinae and plum. And look where more answers would be.Then everything will fall into place, I'm sure.

02.10.2014 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I to the fact that the names of bird cherry have not seen anywhere else in the Soviet literature. Is that his udumali with the advent of the internet, etc. :) So in the internet can be udumali anything :) The only trouble is that people take it at face value. The official name of her general one: Satyrium pruni (Linnaeus, 1758) .And informal (spoken) should also be one thing: theclinae plum :) About any cherries and can be no question. Although it kind of with plum.
Example of our three Belyanko:
Belyanka cabbage or cabbagePieris brassicae, the name given in honor of the cabbage: Brassica oleracea.Belyanka turnip or green-veined whitePieris napi, the name given in honor of the rutabagas: Brassica napobrassica
Belyanka Repnoe or Pieris rapaePieris rapae, the name given in honor of turnips: Brassica rapa
As you can see, they are on the plants of the same genus, but nevertheless they are different types and are called differently. And the name says it is not that the butterfly is tied only to that plant.Russian name (if it is given within the plant) is usually given in the main host plant, and it must be one not to make confusion. Oh, and it is difficult to bring people sometimes .....

02.10.2014 14:16, Peter Khramov:

Ok, understood, thanks for the comments!

02.10.2014 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Basil is convincing to argue that it is plum. And to argue that it is not bird cherry - no, not quite. What is again controversy Russian names? There are two, and the whole business. I wrote to the form on the page to ensure that, if the name comes from the source - so no problem, adds. It does not matter whether it is in harmony with Latin or not.When one type of several Russian - is quite normal.

02.10.2014 13:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In February 30-32, the heat is not so hard to bear, as we have. Rains this week was not. Some days it was overcast, but no precipitation is basically normal and the sun is not as fuck, in Vietnam, for example. In general the most it!

02.10.2014 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, a couple of scans from two different operedeliteley both in Russian calledSatyrium pruni(if it still has thecla). This reader !! And no need to invent new names :)
1) Plavilshchikov NN "Keys to the insects," Moscow, "Topical" in 1994 (reprint edition 1950):

2) BM. Mamaev; LN Medvedev; FNPravdin "to the insects of the European part of the USSR," Moscow, "Education" 1976

These books brought up not one generation enomologov.
And the link: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/36-rhop/lycaenidae/78-satyrium-pruni
I hope this is convincing to argue that it is not Cheremuhovo?

02.10.2014 12:34, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Prices from airlines fly during New Year / Christmas holidays.
Cambodia was not, I can tell by the bordering Ty. From November to May on the continental Thailand - the dry season, from May to October - during the rainy season (May - border last month, may be little rain sometimes). From November to February - comes the Thai winter (day 30-32 C), ie,full of fun, in the remaining months hotter in March and April - Thai summer (in the afternoon to 40-42 C in the shade). In the mountains and in the north a little differently all in the mountains sometimes very cool.

02.10.2014 12:19, Peter Khramov:

In dull weather or not, that's what interested. Very cold dog and 13 degrees Celsius? And when all the weather to go Lucci, not to 40 or 13 and that no rain for a month? Prices - dog with them. What there may be a price ...

02.10.2014 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 8:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What is your understanding of the deaf? The weather in Tae. Everything is much cheaper (3 years ago it was). Whiskey Barroso for $ 6, happi pizza, fish massage- $ 1, 15 minutes, plus a beer as a gift. In the Siem Reap no sea, but the jungle around and temples (Angkor Wat, Angkor Thom, Bayon, KBAL Spien, Banteay Srei and tueva hucha ruins). In the temples you need a minimum of 4 days.Do not like it, you can always go to Thai or Vietnam. In Suanukville it was not about the sea in Cambodia can not say anything.

02.10.2014 0:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.10.2014 0:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.10.2014 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.10.2014 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.10.2014 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Sun. Glade. Swallowtail. Flit from flower to flower. Each delayed for a few seconds, or even less. And the flowers, on which he sits, are not so close to each other. To get close to a 5-10 cm (yes though and 50), is just not enough time. Puglyuchest object reserve behind the scenes - it just scared we did not have time.But the herb may interfere with - yes. Here it is one which objects to whom does not suffice. I now usually lacked focus, rather than interfere with branches. Plus FF on a long DOF though not changed in comparison with the rather short, but visually in a picture object from the background a little more separated, and therefore the effect of herbs (including the front of the object) becomes a little less.

01.10.2014 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Last age before pupation.
It is desirable to specify the geographical picture :)

01.10.2014 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturnia pavonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.10.2014 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.10.2014 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Svetlana Shchavelina.

01.10.2014 22:55, Irina Nikulina:

Basil, correct immediately, please specify

01.10.2014 22:38, Evgeny Komarov:

But I do not like very dlinnofokusniki. Very often, the object is sitting in the grass, bushes, etc., and the longer the directress, the greater the probability of getting it stems, leaves, and other things. And from a short distance, they are not focused. And I have not ever met an object that can not be removed from the 5-10 cm.Already horses at noon to 3 cm can be removed, and the butterfly is much more simple macro. The only thing where dlinnofokusnik amiss - when the object is sitting high up in the branches, the trunk.

01.10.2014 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ischyja hemiphaea / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.10.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ischyja hemiphaea / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.10.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And now I would venture: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/15_EREBINAE/053_Ischyja/Ischyja%20hemiphaea/Ischyja%20hemiphaea.htm

01.10.2014 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's ok now. And in comments to the photo shone empty.

01.10.2014 19:44, Peter Khramov:

And then there to clean, remove all the same. Or comments do you mean?

01.10.2014 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ziridava xylinaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.10.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Question is close because no one knows it is not an answer for six months:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=475943&view=findpost&p=1474491 (Post by 16.03.2014 20:14 )
And here, the site is likely that the same situation. ViewZiridava xylinariahas long been in the catalog. Therefore, the photo goes to him. Irina determined the exhibit, so as a reference to the fact that kanshireiensis Prout, 1958 is a subspecies of the xylinaria is shown below.

01.10.2014 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Igor, another question. How do you distinguish pupae on the floor? After all, as I said at the oleander is impossible to guess. I and all the dolls were identical at first glance, and only after the imago all became clear.
The picture made where all understand imago (this is the most obvious difference in my opinion):

01.10.2014 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, here it is: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33837 should be cleaned. Some bug with menyalkoy. Upload a photo, then changed, and for some reason, refresh your LC. After refreshing the page took a photo to nowhere, and the number remains had to re-ship (

01.10.2014 15:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Status of course APB, but the other is not just a collection (Put solely for the underside. Here underside present: http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Catocalinae/Daddala_lucilla.html

01.10.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very original egg. Although it is a butterfly, and look exactly like quail :) What did not come up with the nature .....

01.10.2014 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.10.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MaleColias croceussort?

01.10.2014 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strange. Determination departed ...

01.10.2014 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota kinabaluensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.10.2014 11:30, Peter Khramov:

People who flogs Cambodia as it does on NG deaf or Mona winded? In Siem Reap, by the way. Demetrius, say something thread.

01.10.2014 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lacanobia thalassina: "Scoop garden gray-brown" , and Lacanobia contigua: "Scoop garden brown-gray" :)
A small difference :)

01.10.2014 10:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

But as yet the author's comments delete?

01.10.2014 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Andrey Ponomarev.

01.10.2014 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Andrey Ponomarev.

01.10.2014 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Andrey Ponomarev.

01.10.2014 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Vitaly Gumenuk Lacanobia contigua / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.10.2014 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Vitaly Gumenuk Lacanobia contigua / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.10.2014 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Vitaly Gumenuk Lacanobia contigua / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.10.2014 1:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.10.2014 1:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.10.2014 1:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.10.2014 1:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.10.2014 1:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.10.2014 1:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

01.10.2014 1:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thisanotia chrysonuchella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.10.2014 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

male

01.10.2014 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

female

01.10.2014 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

male

01.10.2014 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

male

01.10.2014 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

male

30.09.2014 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

A lot of time has passed, maybe until transfer to inaccurately defined or undefined?

30.09.2014 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Vitaly Gumenuk Lacanobia contigua / Andrey Ponomarev.

30.09.2014 22:42, Andrey Ponomarev:

Lacanobia contigua

30.09.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Perhaps the AUT. The question remains in force. What to do with it? Determining the right thing :)

30.09.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mirror, bulbs suitable. The main thing to choose the right distance so as not to burn: it is necessary to experiment.
The very use (do not laugh only) the so-called "Infrared lamp for heating chicken coops" :) This: http://big-kuryatnik.ru/kupit/product/lampa-infrakrasnaya-ikzk it gives a minimum and a maximum of light directed heat.

30.09.2014 22:39, Andrey Ponomarev:

Lacanobia contigua

30.09.2014 22:38, Andrey Ponomarev:

Lacanobia contigua

30.09.2014 22:38, Andrey Ponomarev:

Lacanobia contigua

30.09.2014 22:17, Igor Sakhno:

Yes, I'm on your tip and reflexes.

30.09.2014 22:15, Igor Sakhno:

Great! That is, it may be an ordinary lamp, or it is necessary to heat a small fan to direct heat flux?

30.09.2014 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Earias flavida / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

30.09.2014 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2014 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spaniocentra lobata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree with the first embodiment. I stand.

30.09.2014 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Benbowia kiriakoff / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2014 21:08, Fedor Ovechkin:

Cigaritis lohita?

30.09.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Fascellina plagiata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It

30.09.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macrauzata submontana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree.

30.09.2014 21:01, Fedor Ovechkin:

Cigaritis lohita?

30.09.2014 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parotis marginata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She and ect. I agree.

30.09.2014 20:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lophophelma vigens / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I am pretending and suffered.

30.09.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pomasia salutaris / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2014 20:23, Fedor Ovechkin:

Zizula hylax?

30.09.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nordstromia duplicata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if you agree ... So I bear :)

30.09.2014 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Daddala lucilla / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2014 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2014 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysocraspeda abhadraca / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acropteris ciniferaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Botyodes asialis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tasta montana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tasta montana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tasta montana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.09.2014 17:01, Irina Nikulina:

Acropteris ciniferaria

30.09.2014 16:50, Irina Nikulina:

Botyodes asialis

30.09.2014 16:32, Irina Nikulina:

Most likely,Macrauzata submontana

30.09.2014 16:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2014 12:26, Irina Nikulina:

From the 4 types Lophophelma with light zone at the apex inclined toLophophelma vigensIn the most extensive type of light area. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/11_Lophophelma/Lophophelma%20vigens/Lophophelma%20vigens.htm

30.09.2014 12:00, Irina Nikulina:

From 3 dark Tasta (total 7) likelyTasta montanaIn mothsofborneo external differences between species rather clearly spelled out. Montana is typical for a big round eye with a narrow yellow ring. Soveshenno not have a elliptica. Finds micaceata above 1200m there, but montana just dwells on high 1200-1900m above sea level

30.09.2014 11:48, Andrei Komrakov:

Caradrina clavipalpis (Scopoli, 1763)?

30.09.2014 11:31, Irina Nikulina:

pomasia solutaris http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/09_Larentiinae/15_Pomasia/Pomasia%20salutaris/Pomasia%20salutaris.htm

30.09.2014 8:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

at Diachrysia stenochrysis jumper is not always available. at Diachrysia chrysitis jumper rarely happens. They are easily distinguished by color. stenochrysis- golden yellow, chrysitis - golden-green.

30.09.2014 7:18, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Fascellina plagiata ?

30.09.2014 7:03, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Earias flavida ?

30.09.2014 3:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.09.2014 3:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's her. I once described as the differences seen her here: lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31543

30.09.2014 3:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleksanr, about Taiwan, I do not write, and funet. I'm just some rely on this information in the absence of the other ... And it's the only thing that stops me from carrying, according to the definition of Irina.

30.09.2014 3:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chloroplaga nygmia / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.09.2014 3:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Prisposoblenitse, own design helps in this case :) It provides directed heat flow (distance chosen empirically) raspravilku on top. For butterflies such dimensions as oleander enough hours :) When it is necessary to quickly dry: it is necessary to resort to certain tricks :)))

30.09.2014 2:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander. That's right, so I kind of prepared for it ahead of time :)
At most, honestly these "Ishii," and it was with a whole box of Borneo ..... uncertain. I'm afraid of, to be honest .... Perhaps this winter would get.

30.09.2014 2:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, and what kind, if it is the other? Intriguesh ......)))

30.09.2014 2:12, Irina Nikulina:

Parotis marginata, most likely. http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/63_Crambidae/6109_Pyraustinae/610906400_Parotis/610906402_Parotis_marginata/Parotis_marginata.htm

30.09.2014 1:47, Igor Sakhno:

And he at you so quickly dried up (in the sense - hardened)?

30.09.2014 1:45, Igor Sakhno:

I have information that the oleander in captivity bad eating privet (and crumble it in the fall of one of the latter).

30.09.2014 0:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree :)

30.09.2014 0:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think that's genital animals, but the intensity of the picture is more at Chloroplaga nygmia, can be inaccurate.

30.09.2014 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, Kuzia zapropal? Well you seem to be eager to discuss ph something ...

29.09.2014 23:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ischyja inferna / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.09.2014 23:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2014 23:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

200% not Hulodes caranea, genus and probably another subfamily. :))) If the scoop :))

29.09.2014 23:34, Irina Nikulina:

Benbowia kiriakoff, is likely

29.09.2014 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Messrs :)))

29.09.2014 23:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oroplema oyamana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.09.2014 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2014 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2014 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2014 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2014 23:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago / Andrey Ponomarev Female / Vlad Proklov.

29.09.2014 23:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2014 23:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2014 23:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aphomia sociella / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.09.2014 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sympis rufibasis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.09.2014 23:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's definitely not Dysaethria lilacina, do not meet either one image or in a book or on Web sites, it shows. Similar, yes, and confused straightened copies and photos easy to understand the rest of Basil. :))
Butterfly matches the image Phazaca kosemponicola but Basil writes that only Taiwan, then we have to look at thePhazaca leucocera

29.09.2014 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Daddala lucilla

29.09.2014 23:01, Irina Nikulina:

Flew probably (And I took out of the indefinite and claim) is true, then the same delved down)

29.09.2014 22:50, Irina Nikulina:

And I just think,Oroplema oyamana

29.09.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow is going to pretend and deal with it :)

29.09.2014 22:15, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysocraspeda abhadraca http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=93512

29.09.2014 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhagastis castor / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.09.2014 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it means I am right yesterday. I stand. Here and everything is clear from the phone :)

29.09.2014 22:01, Irina Nikulina:

albomarginatus I immediately excluded)

29.09.2014 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilionidae do differ :))) Say, Attacus atlas.........

29.09.2014 21:58, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkNordstromia duplicata

29.09.2014 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, look. Although Moths of Borneo, I like, except one like it and did not find. True it is everywhere with open wings, and then folded. But appearances guess, in my opinion.

29.09.2014 21:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

and I have the same opinion, there are only three species of this genus.

29.09.2014 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, what can I say ....... can be transferred to inaccurate. Proposed Irina variant according funeta distributed only in Formosa (Taiwan), and no mention of Borneo, etc. (Think of it must still, in short. I'm on the phone, and in the morning moved to the inexact. Of course, if you see other opinions ...

29.09.2014 21:37, Irina Nikulina:

Good that was Inachis io))) (impressed with sorting out some Papilionidae genera))

29.09.2014 21:25, Irina Nikulina:

Rhagastis castor, most likely. I consider and rubetra, but this image http://taibnet.sinica.edu.tw/chi/taibnet_addpicture3.php?name_code=347696&id=12041 prone to Castor)

29.09.2014 21:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agnidra fuscilinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2014 21:21, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you have commented on the type of something, but ...

29.09.2014 21:18, Peter Khramov:

Experience!

29.09.2014 21:04, Lev Bely:

Japanese flautist Youkie Ota of the Odense Symphony Orchestra, Denmark, was honoured with a... butterfly that perched right upon the flautist's nose during an international flute competition. Pierre Sancan genuine fan?

The butterfly fluttered around seeking a better seat and eventually took the best one in the very front row, on the flautist's nose.

Nevertheless, Ota didn't look any disturbed and went on her play as a true professional carrying it through to the end.

Having finished, Youkie Ota just gently brushed the butterfly aside and smiled.

Metro, http://metro.co.uk

Butterfly flew to the... flute sound

29.09.2014 20:57, Irina Nikulina:

Agnidra fuscilinea

29.09.2014 20:27, Irina Nikulina:

:) Grow under the guidance of, reach for luminaries))

29.09.2014 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

during the evening I see what I can :)

29.09.2014 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

I almost got involved Vasily :))). I looked that over look like Prochoreutis sehestediana, wanted to put in the definition, but to be safe to refresh the screen. :))) Irina has already identified. :)))

29.09.2014 20:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prochoreutis sehestediana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2014 20:04, Irina Nikulina:

Prochoreutis sehestediana? (had a little doubt, the view is very similar to myllerana, but there are brighter than white rice)

29.09.2014 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I came 2 males and 1 female (there were three dolls). In the current night out male and female. I thought pair and get eggs. But the question arose what to feed the caterpillars in deep autumn, Moscow and the subsequent winter. And the main food plant we have. I had to stay one once for collection.I do not regret: it is precisely for this purpose and initially undertook dolls :)

29.09.2014 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Look, the people on the site appeared so apayu in the hope of checking. In order not to have slipped in anywhere :)

29.09.2014 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

up.

29.09.2014 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

up.

29.09.2014 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

up.

29.09.2014 17:55, Irina Nikulina:

I have it easy "in your face" I know)) The first non-small butterfly, stranded on the grid, on my first night LW Fotolia - impressed, the only type of its kind in the Russian Federation) There is the frame.

29.09.2014 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena thersamon / Confidently identified / Female / Fedor Ovechkin.

29.09.2014 16:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

And I watched it in Corydalis :))

29.09.2014 16:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oreta pulchripes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2014 16:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oreta pulchripes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.09.2014 16:23, Irina Nikulina:

Oreta pulchripes

29.09.2014 14:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ruslan Salmanov! Poymanov List of species to see!

29.09.2014 14:23, Igor Sakhno:

And I, judging by the state, will be released tomorrow. All females like.

29.09.2014 10:20, Fedor Ovechkin:

I am leaning toward Lycaena thersamon. Can anyone confirm or deny?

29.09.2014 5:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Released today ...
Just her, from one "point" with the male and lacks here :)
Later it will be unfolding for couples.

29.09.2014 5:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2014 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2014 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.09.2014 5:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.09.2014 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hulodes caranea / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.09.2014 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achaea serva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.09.2014 1:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cechenena lineosa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.09.2014 1:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cechenena lineosa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.09.2014 0:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cechenena lineosa (Walker, 1856)

29.09.2014 0:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hulodes caranea female

29.09.2014 0:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Achaea serva

28.09.2014 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrioglypta eurytusalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.09.2014 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sympis rufibasis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.09.2014 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nomophila noctuella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.09.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mimeusemia postica / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.09.2014 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mimeusemia postica / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.09.2014 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

28.09.2014 19:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mimeusemia postica

28.09.2014 17:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You can dream up on this theme, drawing from a specific name: "Grammodes dvuperevyazannaya" or more "Lentochnitsa dvuperevyazannaya" :)

28.09.2014 17:04, Vladimir Deryabin:

Lada, then will remain untranslatable Grammodes bifasciata.

28.09.2014 16:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Frankly, I do not know anything about Russian names (

28.09.2014 16:54, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you, Basil.
A Russian name of this butterfly have?

28.09.2014 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very little it here ....

28.09.2014 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Grammodes bifasciata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.09.2014 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum stellatarum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.09.2014 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum stellatarum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.09.2014 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

28.09.2014 13:00, Ruslan Salmanov:

Hello! The trip went well overall. I took rental car that Cuba is quite expensive $ 90 / day (Kia Picanto). Petrol 98 worth $ 1.3 / liter. Refueling with gasoline only in a smaller cities. About diesel can not say anything but it is. The roads are good. Pro generator also can not say but I think that you can buy.Went as advised by Dmitri in Zapata (with all the stops on the way to her), caves Varadero, Matanzas neighborhood, waterfall El Nicho. He caught only butterflies. From places where he was the richest in my area is El Nicho. The weather was perfect, only two days during the afternoon rains.As I have explained that in mid-July to early August the weather is dry, and in principle it is the rainy period. Caught somewhere species 40-45. It is quite a bit since catching butterflies was not the main purpose of the trip. The next time go specifically for this purpose. Thanks Dmitri for help!

28.09.2014 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MaleHulodes caranea?

28.09.2014 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rhagastis castorvisible. In Borneo nominative: Rhagastis castor castor (Walker, 1856) .
I can not stand. I stand up for discussion.

27.09.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chloroplaga nygmiaandChloroplaga pallidamore inclined to the former. Who else thinks something?

27.09.2014 19:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you all, taught her to define :)

27.09.2014 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dilophodes elegans / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.09.2014 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

27.09.2014 16:10, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Basil. In her thought, but something confused, reinsured. And about six months ago, the synonym asked here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28061

27.09.2014 15:43, Vladimir Deryabin:

26.09.2014 20:17, Petr Khramov: Although after I took Fudge, who generally do not have interchangeable lenses (and not particularly macro mode), the desire to approach the mirror no not at all was ...
Yes-ah like. It would be nice to walk only with Fujiko. But apart from butterflies to birds and marshes still it would be nice to catch.That's drag with a second camera with a 500mm offtopnymi.

27.09.2014 15:24, Basil Sergienko:

Rather Xestia baja, the Japanese, it has tabida (Kononenko considers synonymous)

27.09.2014 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My verdict: C. lineosa is still :) Now once again both species gradually completed on the site and found thatCechenena subangustataI have the same collection of lineozy and it is very different. Even outwardly it is much larger and almost green :)

27.09.2014 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good view. In the Moscow region is rare and local, it is found in bogs. My dream is to find yourself, but still can ....

26.09.2014 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I think that the two commentaries, the same its way :)
Type:
1) 26.09.2014 0:08 type is not defined → Asota kinabaluensis / Just some / Alexander Zhakov.
2) 26.09.2014 0:10 type is not defined → Asota kinabaluensis / Just some / Vasiliy Feoktistov
And then, in fact, the number two interchanges definition in favor of the number one.
Can not be so?

26.09.2014 20:17, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, and that there is not the quality? Normally all the same. Wings only partially blur gone, but that's really a problem specific frame, rather than bundles of lens / camera in general.
And yes, for very small companions (especially when shooting flown to light) 1: 1 is needed cropped.Just cut further, and electronic publishing will be of sufficient size image.
Once again, Vladimir will support over long telephoto: yes sprinkled on the stub at the diaphragm with 4300 mm lens a very useful thing for butterflies, starting with the size of the hive. With the built-in flash includingYou can shoot a very good kind of hectic, to which a 100 mm makrikom get close is very napryazhno.
Although after I took Fudge, who generally do not have interchangeable lenses (and not particularly macro mode), the mirror approach is no desire at all was gone ... Strange, I was a staunch zerkalschikom until this year to 95, probably.

26.09.2014 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, no problem, you just have to phone pre-will.

26.09.2014 20:09, Peter Khramov:

Yet, if it is not called a form.

26.09.2014 20:08, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and how this can be a cure?

26.09.2014 19:58, Alex Dumchus:

Clearly not Helenus! Looking at mine (Vietnam, China, The Philippines, Thailand, Taiwan, Indonesia), they all have this back spot ending on the third vein, all save hystaspes which does on the fourth.

26.09.2014 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyssa zampa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2014 15:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ourapteryx claretta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.09.2014 14:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

26.09.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.09.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.09.2014 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

First swallow :)
This raised is so beautiful.
Will add later spread one.

26.09.2014 13:49, Alexander Belousov:

Glitch with upload Xestia c-nigrum due to the hyphen. Vasily's right!

26.09.2014 13:37, Irina Nikulina:

Female

26.09.2014 13:36, Irina Nikulina:

Female

26.09.2014 13:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I've happened to collect this species, will check its name on Monday. This is noctuid.

26.09.2014 13:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No, it's ok with wings, this is female, just spent much time in an envelope which resulted in such abdomen flattened sides.

26.09.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Most likely Ischyja inferna male, Swinhoe, 1902. If right, will add the species. More opinions needed.

26.09.2014 13:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Here's what Pittaway says (no chance for us to see underside as I see):
A variable species in forewing upperside ground colour and pattern intensity, with some specimens approaching Cechetra scotti and others Cechetra subangustata. Distinguishable from the former by the less intense green band along the costa and from the latter by the orange (not green) tone of the undersides of the wings. Forewing upperside with full complement of seven oblique postmedian lines; lines 3 and 4 the most conspicuous, the other five being narrower and subequal in intensity. There is considerable variation in the brightness of the spaces between the bands (and hence the prominence of the bands). Fresh specimens are decidedly green, fading to brown with age and wear. Forewing underside ground colour orange-beige. Hindwing upperside pale buff median band of variable width, but never heavily suffused with green (as in Cechetra subangustata).
I'm totally stuck with these "green" Sphingidae from Borneo!!! Half of features have don't work or have a minor meaning.

26.09.2014 13:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The wing shape is absolutely abnormal. Cechetra subangustata seems not to be described in China, not a problem with hawkmoths though.

26.09.2014 12:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've got a few lineosa in my collection, successfully identified. Am to check later. Weird lineosa imho.

26.09.2014 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ourapteryx podaliriata / Vasiliy Feoktistov Ourapteryx claretta / Irina Nikulina.

26.09.2014 12:12, Basil Sergienko:

Besides the hindwing patter differs — claretta

26.09.2014 12:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

The pattern looks quite similar, the wing shape is different.

26.09.2014 11:45, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, Dmitry, are you sure about the ID? I may be wrong but isn't this claretta? Podaliriata looks somehow different in tails http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=228393 Also mothsofborneo.com says clearly about distinctions in Diagnosis : http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Ourapterygini/ourapterygini_1_1.php

26.09.2014 11:35, Irina Nikulina:

I think Ourapteryx claretta

26.09.2014 11:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sumatra ssp. is called enganius. No difference between this and ones from Java or Kalimantan. How it's possible to tell region by pic??? Your expert confused something. helenus fairly has different hindwing bands and never does yellow wedge on forewings. Not helenus it is. This is Papilio hipponous.

26.09.2014 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dilophodes elegans / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.09.2014 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've checked http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-11/Boarmiini/boarmiini_5_1.php
No abdomen there though (seems it has been prepared), generally agree. Moving. Moreover the link Irina gave clears that up, no questions.

26.09.2014 11:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Isn't that Cechenena subangustata, by chance?

26.09.2014 11:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

26.09.2014 10:36, Yuri Semejkin:

One more point of view here. I've sent this to Y. A. Chistyakov, Institute of Biology and Soil Science, FEB RAS. His version: "Yury, this is most likely Papilio helenus, one of its subspecies, and one in you pic is clearly from Sumatra. Can't remember the precise name of ssp."

26.09.2014 1:49, Irina Nikulina:

Doubts between two (of three) Spaniocentra from Borneo, Spaniocentra lobata and endemic Spaniocentra apatelloides. Looking at how brown parts are spread, rather first one.

26.09.2014 0:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter note.
Invalid comment about my transfer from 9/26/2014 0:10. I could not bear to determine and oprelelyal independently in one and the same time, with Alexander and he could not see that he has already suffered.Just get a patch in time and automatically test: I allegedly suffered determine that it would be very ugly, with my hand, it happened really.

26.09.2014 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

26.09.2014 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:) I crossed it, even from your phone to recognize 100%

26.09.2014 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.09.2014 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota kinabaluensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.09.2014 22:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

25.09.2014 22:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, the bar helps :) Thank you.

25.09.2014 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia icterata / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

25.09.2014 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia icterata / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

25.09.2014 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia icterata / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

25.09.2014 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.09.2014 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Option only one note on the upper and lower wings in the center there is a black bar, and that rarely happens at the blues, well, even on the little things. too late of course, but from there I have determined the copies. although he was killed. :)

25.09.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia anteros / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.09.2014 22:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, just on top do not know the exact distinguishing features ... there double-triple bundles produced inaccurate.

25.09.2014 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Do not sorrow, and laziness, it is only necessary to tinker, if you do not know just what kind of view, very few options can be. Let me see. :)

25.09.2014 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

25.09.2014 21:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Vladimir, without underside there probably with the definition of sadness ...

25.09.2014 21:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter and the flags for "mutant" is not provided? ..

25.09.2014 21:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, still allow me to substitute pictures. Though his partly renovated to have been less than 1024x768.
And ready to replace small amounts of photos manually. Thanks =)

25.09.2014 21:51, Shamil Murtazin:

http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29102
that's fine. makrik 1: 1, sprinkled on the Canon 90mm, ie effective 135mm; further cropped.

25.09.2014 20:30, Vladimir Deryabin:

25.09.2014 19:23, Alexander Zhakov: It is not small, the quality is very average ... Lada, next season I will try to pull a more makrik and 1: 1.
... To see these are not small.

25.09.2014 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If this is subspecies, that could clear the situation. I gave link to nominative, didn't consider subspecies. Will check. Number 1 task for tomorrow. Alexandr, thanks.

25.09.2014 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.09.2014 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.09.2014 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Please check The moths of Borneo, pics aren't quite fine though, but Dilophodes elegans is there, btw some sources say Borneo has its own subspecies and even a few are described :)

25.09.2014 19:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's not small, the quality is very average, just kind of a very specific, it any more does not seem to be so determined, even in silhouette. :)

25.09.2014 18:27, Vladimir Deryabin:

25.09.2014 17:32, Petr Khramov Yuri meant small butterflies. ...
Two walnut - a lot, or a bunch? (from).
This butterfly:
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33655
fine or not fine? It also removed 400 / 5.6 to 1: 2.5.

25.09.2014 17:32, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, Yuri meant small butterflies. Where the scale of 1: 2.5 - it does not scale: -) In general, I do both hands dlinnofokusniki (if nemelochi).

25.09.2014 17:22, Vladimir Deryabin:

10.11.2013 2:03, Yuri Semeykin ... With respect to the tripod-nation removes and eliminates bad, mainly telephoto. But then again, butterflies in my small they did not withdraw, and then look in the scene where she is.
Hats telephoto Sigma 400 / 5.6 APO Tele Macro and Sigma 300/4 APO Tele Macro. They are honest psevdomakro 1: 2.5. Ie Large Butterfly takes about half of the frame, which is a matrix D800e quite well.MDF these telephoto 160 and 120cm respectively. From this distance, especially without disturbing the butterfly, you can almost always guaranteed to make the shot.

25.09.2014 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, I'll surely do tomorrow and will put all dots on i :) Daytime I could surf the web with my phone only, so sadly can't check....

25.09.2014 11:06, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, I don't insist on ID, just suppose... Still what about Japanese elegans may differ a lot compared to elegans from Borneo?) Please check the same Japanese, pics from Borneo:
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.2_Ennominae/2729_Dilophodes_elegans/Dilophodes%20elegans.htm

25.09.2014 6:19, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you, Peter! We wait!

25.09.2014 4:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, rather not if rely upon Japanese guys:
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Dilophodes_elegans_elegans.html
On others either...
I've digged lots on this, there are lots of images where it's identified to gender only (
Hard nut it is, alas (

25.09.2014 3:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sympis rufibasis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.09.2014 0:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia rubriventris / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.09.2014 0:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia rubriventris / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.09.2014 0:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia rubriventris / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.09.2014 23:50, Irina Nikulina:

Spilarctia rubriventris

24.09.2014 22:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiommata megera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cossus cossus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio machaon / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Evergestis aenealis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nomophila noctuella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:36, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably Dilophodes elegans

24.09.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Penicillaria meeki / Vasiliy Feoktistov Penicillaria jocosatrix / Irina Nikulina.

24.09.2014 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thank you very much for the correction definition. Went for the first-link and read the "Identification"
It is clearly painted differences between the two: Of course, this is not the Penicillaria meeki , and Penicillaria jocosatrix bear

24.09.2014 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa cardui / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

24.09.2014 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiommata megera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.09.2014 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Going with The Moths of Borneo, Holloway, 2001, I'd say this is Lyclene obscurilinea, no any images of the species though anywhere. Another similar species, Lyclene mesilaulinea, described by same Holloway in 2001, looks somehow different in pics.

24.09.2014 20:50, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, why the very meeki? Which sources you relied upon? Nothing possible to see on mothsofborneo.com, there are other websites though with quite clear descriptions of different features in these species. There is no dark grey line which is specific for meeki: http://www.papua-insects.nl/insect%20orders/Lepidoptera/Euteliidae/Euteliinae/Penicillaria/Penicillaria%20meeki.htm. Here is the difference between 5 species described in Identification. I'd rather say this is Penicillaria jocosatrix http://gvcocks.homeip.net/lepidoptera/Noctuidae/Euteliinae/penicillaria_jocosatrix.htm, http://www.nbaii.res.in/insectpests/images/Penicillaria-jocosatrix10.jpg and other websites. Please check.

24.09.2014 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dokladayu myself, just-fire :) I work tomorrow (day) and therefore I do not have Skype.

24.09.2014 18:00, Irina Nikulina:

When I press any of those, nothing happens (only shift to the very pic). Before everything worked fine, I edited couple of times my comments.

24.09.2014 17:58, Peter Khramov:

Don't function — how come?

24.09.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clostera anastomosis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.09.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clostera anastomosis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.09.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clostera anastomosis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.09.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clostera anastomosis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.09.2014 17:44, Irina Nikulina:

Sadly last two days can't use "Edit" and "Delete" buttons as they don't function, so add, this is more often known as Dirades kosemponicola.

24.09.2014 17:41, Irina Nikulina:

I see another species, most likely Dysaethria kosemponicola

24.09.2014 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, well, so that when you can?

24.09.2014 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Imho this is it. There are 4 species in Far East (only one of them is absent in Moscow region). Yet waiting for other thoughts.

24.09.2014 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added species and moved.

24.09.2014 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ercheia cyllaria / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 12:57, Irina Nikulina:

Clostera anastomosis ?

24.09.2014 12:39, Irina Nikulina:

Clostera anastomosis ?

24.09.2014 12:39, Irina Nikulina:

Clostera anastomosis ?

24.09.2014 12:12, Peter Khramov:

Alexander regards Kasahstana - more likely will work with Kazakhstan since October, a month.

24.09.2014 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diehlea tumida / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diehlea tumida / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think now everything is correct. All are here :))

24.09.2014 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Targalla subocellata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added species and moved.

24.09.2014 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lineopalpa horsfieldi / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Herochroma urapteraria / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 10:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Putting this species up for discussion. As I see, this is Scopula apicipunctata. Grounds: light background, light brown bands.
Alexandr! Vasily! There is clearly this spot on the forewing apex. Can you agree on species? or something is wrong again.

24.09.2014 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysaethria lilacina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysaethria lilacina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Horithyatira decorata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Horithyatira decorata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've been wrong yesterday, this moth belongs to a different family. It's a direct relative of our Thyatira batis: Horithyatira decorata. Moving.

24.09.2014 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arcte modesta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 6:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added species and moved.

24.09.2014 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Penicillaria meeki / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 6:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Targalla subocellata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 6:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Overworked yesterday. This is Targalla subocellata :) Moving.

24.09.2014 6:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dilophodes sp.

24.09.2014 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Problepsis borneamagna / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite known endemic species from Mount Kinabalu after which it was named.

24.09.2014 5:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota kinabaluensis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.09.2014 1:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Areas galactina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 1:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyana cruentata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.09.2014 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added species and moved. Was being moderated.

24.09.2014 0:07, Enio Branco: This species is identified correctly.

24.09.2014 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pagyda salvalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.09.2014 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will add species and move now )

23.09.2014 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

23.09.2014 23:55, Irina Nikulina:

Pagyda salvalis

23.09.2014 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Problepsis borneamagna / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's cool.... Such is Nymphalis vaualbum :)
Upside down and wings classically spread resting on a leaf.
Quite artistic shot (

23.09.2014 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I saw it in June if I remember that right: walking through the grass and shooed that out :)

23.09.2014 23:03, Irina Nikulina:

Oppositely one of the most frequent finds in Anisimovka back then )

23.09.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Still it's so beautiful :) Weirdly I met it just once in a life, in the mid 90s, near Zheleznodorozhny town.

23.09.2014 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis vestigialis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

23.09.2014 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis vestigialis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

23.09.2014 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis vestigialis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

23.09.2014 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis vestigialis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

23.09.2014 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis vestigialis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

23.09.2014 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis vestigialis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

23.09.2014 20:16, Peter Khramov:

If you've got lenses, now you may buy digital box price of 30 packs of plain negative analogue film...

23.09.2014 20:13, Peter Khramov:

Generally here are two images of a donkey and a rabbit, one in one.

23.09.2014 19:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Avatha sp.

23.09.2014 19:22, Yuriy Karpov:

No offense at all. My equipment includes Nicon, Canon, Olimpus, Samsung. First two are analog with all features and lenses, just now hard to find fine film here and it gets worse when you need processing and printing, all shifted to digital.

23.09.2014 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

People see many things in moths :)
Can't help but share this cool pic:

From there : https://www.flickr.com/photos/indianacristo/6852044427/sizes/o/in/photostream/

23.09.2014 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We were skonnektilis night and I added it. About plans I do not know :)

23.09.2014 18:49, Peter Khramov:

Well, that Alexander would be today or when? Something I do not see the answers and greetings!

23.09.2014 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added appearance.

23.09.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Avatha uloptera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Avatha sp. It is possible Avatha heterographa Hampson, 1912 ???

23.09.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added appearance. Another endemic :)

23.09.2014 17:56, Lev Bely:

Petr:)

23.09.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypersypnoides fenella / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 17:52, Peter Khramov:

Hard stuff. This source is well-known though for its regular yellowness.

23.09.2014 17:48, Lev Bely:



Yvonne Esquilin saw Jesus image on Eacles imperialis's back.

The moth was resting on Yvonne's home in Georgetown, Texas, where she found it last week.

“At first it looked like Jesus,” said Esquilin. “And I still think it looks like Jesus.”

E. imperialis is a quite huge saturniid moth size about of a human hand. Yvonne says the moth's colors indicate she's in for some good fortune. Esquilin family believes the brown colour means big news whilst yellow splashes stand for home.

“I believe this was a sign. God is letting me know good news is coming and to keep the hope.”

Esquilin hopes that means she could pay for her daughter's education. Yvonne makes little of sceptic people which see nothing special in the moth's coloration.

“People also saw an image of the Devil which is kind of creepy but after staring at it for so long it almost looks like it,” she admitted.

Meanwhile the moth spent one day at Esquilin's home and got off for another home waiting for luck.

MailOnline, http://www.dailymail.co.uk

Photo: saturniid moth E. imperialis, Yvonne Esquilin, http://www.dailymail.co.uk

23.09.2014 17:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clethrophora angulipennis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diehlea tumida / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it is: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/ophiusini/ophiusini_6_1.php
The generic name in quotes ....... :) What do you mean do something ???
And the Japs is the same thing: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/15_EREBINAE/029_Parallelia/Parallelia%20calefaciens/Parallelia%20calefaciens.htm

23.09.2014 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maniola jurtina ?

23.09.2014 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesudra bisecta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Vamuna remelana / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 15:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I look, also not found.

23.09.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For me, right Matt and Vasiliev: http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Ectropis_excellens.html

23.09.2014 15:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Dropped similar file this individual mats and Vasiliev. Both are identified as Ectropis excellens (Butler, 1884)

23.09.2014 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Images found on the network.

23.09.2014 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hydrelia musculata / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.09.2014 15:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Ctenognophos grandinaria (Motschulsky, 1861) Determined: Vasilenko SV Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals

23.09.2014 15:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

But it is very different from the approachable online and on our website Ctenognophos grandinaria. Let's wait with moving it.

23.09.2014 14:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Ctenognophos grandinaria (Motschulsky, 1861). Identified by Vasilenko S.V. (Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Russian Academy of Sciences)

23.09.2014 14:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Hydrelia musculata (Staudinger, 1897) Determined: Vasilenko SV Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals.

23.09.2014 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I want to submit a new site for the genus and species :)
As an instance, however osavlyaet much to be desired, but I have it in one collection, alas (

23.09.2014 13:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Supposedly Mudaria sp. Beautiful noctuid even with such fancy name...... :)
Can't find the species. Anyone knows?

23.09.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All right, now we can talk out loud (so far three): koferentsii ready. If someone else from having Skype, wants to join, please send contact details to me on Skype, on nickname: vfeoktistov1 . Connect :)

23.09.2014 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I kept thinking, who is this :)
Here and found here: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/miscellaneous_i/miscellaneousi_4_3.php
And there, too, broken ...... But still, these photos will be, one of the very few online photo kind :)

23.09.2014 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Platyja sumatrana / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Platyja sumatrana / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin.

23.09.2014 9:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin.

23.09.2014 9:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Boloria selene / Alexsandr Martukov Boloria euphrosyne / .

23.09.2014 9:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Boloria selene / Alexsandr Martukov Boloria euphrosyne / .

23.09.2014 8:56, Shamil Murtazin:

photo in the group exactly the same instance. Please make them all the same species. Thank you!

23.09.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cricula trifenestrata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cricula trifenestrata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.09.2014 8:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Still, what is it healthy)

23.09.2014 1:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pontia edusa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2014 1:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima aurantia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2014 1:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima aurantia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2014 1:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima aurantia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2014 1:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima aurantia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2014 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gillmeria pallidactyla / Marija Jaunkunga Gillmeria ochrodactyla / Irina Nikulina.

23.09.2014 1:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gillmeria pallidactyla / Marija Jaunkunga Gillmeria ochrodactyla / Irina Nikulina.

22.09.2014 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Regret not collected and gave this year (now wait until next year. A caterpillar I found the time: will.

22.09.2014 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I can do. Got some more from Egypt.

22.09.2014 22:02, Peter Khramov:

You might simply have changed the older one to a newest... will talk about that on skype later.

22.09.2014 22:01, Peter Khramov:

So far stays here.

22.09.2014 22:00, Peter Khramov:

So far stays here.

22.09.2014 22:00, Peter Khramov:

None of the expanded longer present.

22.09.2014 21:59, Peter Khramov:

So far stays here.

22.09.2014 21:59, Peter Khramov:

So far stays here.

22.09.2014 21:58, Peter Khramov:

This one stays here so far.

22.09.2014 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Was IDed just by chance, something kept. :))

22.09.2014 20:21, Maria Pozdnova:

Didn't mean to demonstrate the specimen. Just wanted to get ID. Will remove with no regrets :)

22.09.2014 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Svetlana, I have it from Peninsular Malaysia: Cameron Highlands . I mean it.
It seems kind is everywhere :)

22.09.2014 19:42, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Basil, I took off in the Malaysian part of Borneo, nat. park. Gunung Alab.

22.09.2014 19:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Amphipyra berbera lived a long life. Why to add such pics? Would be great to hear the author. ;))

22.09.2014 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra tragopoginis / Tentatively identified / Maria Pozdnova Not identified.

22.09.2014 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra tragopoginis / Tentatively identified / Maria Pozdnova Not identified.

22.09.2014 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

It lived a very long lifeAmphipyra berbera. Why put a picture is not clear. I would like to hear the answer of the author. ;))

22.09.2014 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Prior to sort reached: Eupterote sp.
Apparently a difficult race, but maybe someone knows the look?

22.09.2014 15:58, Irina Nikulina:

And in my opinion, is not it. The author himself has defined and put in Psyche casta (et al. Photo), but asks to check for compliance with the mindRebelia herrichiella, and this is likely. Or others. View from Rebelia ... So, I think, will not have to endure

22.09.2014 15:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you Alexander!

22.09.2014 15:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks Basil! I take note

22.09.2014 15:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Put

22.09.2014 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is very likely that it was she: http://britishlepidoptera.weebly.com/012-psyche-casta.html
But the psyche most accurately determined by my Case consists: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29982 (100%) or genitals. My opinion: you can move, but inaccurate.

22.09.2014 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

22.09.2014 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

22.09.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

22.09.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

22.09.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

22.09.2014 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

22.09.2014 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

22.09.2014 14:39, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, including data and the blue of the site are available in the catalog. Go to the directory, select the Primorsky region, and in the column Custom taxon, for example, the genus Scopula. This is much easier than climbing on the book ...
Just fire ready reference for this sample: http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Scopula&oregs=or&rgs[]=40&order=lat

22.09.2014 14:04, Basil Sergienko:

In addition, apicipunctata distinct boundary line and a round rear fenders. At the site that you bring only the first can still be apicipunctata, the rest I think, an erroneous definition (of course I could be wrong). For us it would be simplicity and grated floslactata immutata. We must look blue, that there is a careful and try to measure up.I have now only the tablet and do not have access to the directory.

22.09.2014 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, and why are you in my LC for for this image can not put "female"?

22.09.2014 13:35, Irina Nikulina:

There are 2 photos of the butterflies, we have already dealt with this. Second http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26121. We ought to leave one (the primary was just that). Here the formPsyche castamove, of course, if it is so. Photo right is available.

22.09.2014 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is not Scopula apicipunctata and most likely a different look than the previous neScopula apicipunctata. At present Scopula apicipunctata, always on top of the upper wing of the black point, hence the Latin. names, these do not.

22.09.2014 12:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is not Scopula apicipunctata.

22.09.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have sent you a letter. How about the proposal?

22.09.2014 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2014 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2014 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

In the summer, when all travel and not near a computer, very easy to miss a message. Not sure of the definition, let hanging in uncertain why produce errors. :))

22.09.2014 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Evergestis pallidata / Imago / Vitaly Gumenuk Ostrinia nubilalis / Female / Irina Nikulina.

22.09.2014 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.09.2014 11:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Taki conference to create a site to discuss all issues collectively. And more people pull up :) The idea, I think right :)

22.09.2014 11:30, Peter Khramov:

Basil, nothing strange. What for to you my skype if it did not have to ring with Alexander? We have something with you on the phone and always magёm.

22.09.2014 10:57, Yuri Semejkin:

I agree Alexander. In fact after some time, sometimes there is no confidence in the original definition. More bad that in some subfamilies moths and no description is necessary only to focus on the image of an Internet, and there is sometimes a full spread.

22.09.2014 10:52, Peter Khramov:

Gallery will be divided into subsections. Of these, in fact, two of butterflies - the main gallery and more. In the second photograph are, for example, points or those which currently can not be evaluated, and other such like.

22.09.2014 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I ask a question about 2 months ago .....
Then I put in inaccurate.
Guys, I sketched version of communication (I hope you know where) :)

22.09.2014 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pyrausta sanguinalis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Pyrausta virginalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2014 9:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, right, we do not always understand the positions correct each other :)
I have no complaints about the definition of Andrew, I have a claim to the definition of Basil. :)
ThisPyrausta virginalis.

22.09.2014 7:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you for the clarification. As the rhythm toydu travel - could the mood for the compilation "poyasnilok" saytovyh appear. There will need to add this information.

22.09.2014 6:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, a little clarification on the exotic that I spread uncertainty: I expect it myself, and also to determine. More here as you can see there is no one to do it. And spread, in the vague hope of help from the only relatively difficult species. In other resource except molbiola None.And molbiole with exotic know yourself as nothing :) Thank God there cajarc me one Asota identified and a good resource for them tossed on which I have identified a second species, subspecies, even before :) and the rest will understand as much as possible. The rest - in Skype :)

22.09.2014 5:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you've got Skype appeared?
Gentlemen, let's create a conference and discuss aloud.
My username on Skype has long been in the public domain on my page of the author.
And today, when I come home from work, it will be online.I wonder why I do not know your Skype?
Alexander, but your Skype me in my words, if it has not changed?
Generally it is best to solve many issues on Skype than to torment the keyboard on the site.

22.09.2014 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In Turkey, it is in full growth. Alexander, do you mean that the definition of Andrew wrong? I for certain reasons, have a hunch that there Proklov defined. Later, it will be necessary to ask Vlad.

22.09.2014 3:52, Irina Nikulina:

And this is notOstrinia nubilalis(even from others. Subfamily)?

22.09.2014 2:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

What is the gallery primary and secondary?

22.09.2014 2:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia anteros / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.09.2014 2:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is a very different kind, do not delete a name that we could find then. :)

22.09.2014 2:04, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, bear in mind to mold the size of 1024x768 is not necessary, the proportions can be any. If you want to Fota does not scale, it is enough to enter into this box. Ie 1024h500 also will not be scaled, as well as 340h768. You catch?

22.09.2014 2:01, Peter Khramov:

And phot good, and the point will be useful. It is not as such in the definition, and picture division into primary and secondary ...

22.09.2014 1:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Images of this kind of site is not :)

22.09.2014 1:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily I of this butterfly for the first time no no 20 did not see when we start to define, and not to. I have not watched the options, but the image is very different from those already defined.

22.09.2014 1:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determine I think you can question whether it is necessary?

22.09.2014 1:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

That does not move, not yet come to a common denominator. :)
Skype day just will not work, try the evening when on duty will not be involved. :)

22.09.2014 0:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, you're doing divination, like - not like, more like less like. Do you know why experts are silent? think. complex group of many similar, very little material (images of Primorye and the Far East). Be patient.Request to moderators, move these types of statements after Sergienko or Gordeeva, they most of us understand in moths. :) Well, or if, Yuri, you identify them in Vladivostok. :) This post applies to all DV pyadinitsam.

22.09.2014 0:41, Peter Khramov:

In general, before the discussions would be good to us with you, Alexander, in Skype have come out to discuss the matter aloud. You Tomorrow (Monday) afternoon you can?

22.09.2014 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Wait a move. Let's first discuss the general situation: some photos, we recommend shipping etc. And then on the public.

22.09.2014 0:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil and Peter again raises questions about the quality of photos and image quality to them butterflies.I'm really embarrassed gentlemen, when there are not qualitative, not straightened, not straightened up or pereraspravlennye items (not to be confused with spread of new :)) photos of butterflies live a long and happy life, who gave most of the scales, the world and enable taking pictures of themselves with all angles.Yes, of angles, is a separate issue. is silent. Why rush and throw on the site is not a high quality material with possible subsequent replacement, the reputation of a site created for years, and each day separately. We have a separate page of forum and to clarify the definition sometimes there really well, pictures of very poor quality.after determining their need to remove without pitifully. I must have missed something. And the opportunity to remove other people's photos, or just recommend to delete the photo.It does not matter, it is advisable not to expose these photos which then must be removed, this can be done when the photos were measured in hundreds, today thousands and tens of thousands, and if a low-quality picture does not appear, the site is only a plus.
Now, by definition.in some cases, just to determine that would not stand in uncertain, at the same time lay vague, and that a big question is determined. Especially grusno see such action by active members of the site. There are a number of resources where you can define and then put on a specific site.No, let the moderators determine, and the moderators of the knowledge is also very limited resource. Most of all, let's please upload only photos of good quality (I'm not talking super and excellent) and certain. I started with one, the other finished. and probably would like it to read that all members of the site.I will try to move some of the text. elsewhere.

21.09.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If the fall in the wood there is: so she has arranged for the winter, and she did not need to eat until the spring: it's time to "help" her to spend the winter in the refrigerator. Well, and in the spring to get and finish feeding :)
Good luck in this case :)

21.09.2014 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now issues have disappeared. Even with the phone learned darling :)

21.09.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.09.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.09.2014 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.09.2014 16:26, Irina Nikulina:

I would have said. that virgulata, wait for the verdict of experts.

21.09.2014 15:53, Yuri Semejkin:

It seems more like a Scopula tenuisocius

21.09.2014 15:22, Maria Pozdnova:

Next time, be sure to try. I do this is not the first find, though not every time on the plant and on the piece of wood - firewood

21.09.2014 14:47, Yuri Semejkin:

I'll think about it.

21.09.2014 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ooh, it's a long business, Yuri :) In it, as in any, other business skills come with age and never those skills do not happen - they are always a little :) Yet still ask such rights, if possible. It is useful for the future: not all the same to Peter delete photos on request :)

21.09.2014 14:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks Basil!
With regard to the right to replace, such as duck early. First, we must learn to spread.

21.09.2014 11:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes of course

21.09.2014 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We have to wait Basil opinion on this matter.

21.09.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, do it. And I think it should be done for all the modders (probably with many gadgets go or will go) :)

21.09.2014 11:21, Peter Khramov:

What is there to discuss, I'm for it. And right there: -) A will or will not - see. I think for the time being is very unlikely that there will be something bad in such terms for editing.

21.09.2014 11:18, Peter Khramov:

Who you can or go to the link, and then the number you see (and then back), or a long press on the link and look at the properties of the address. But I understand that it is less convenient to do to have room (or all modders, or do you only). Right now looked, I even easier - just long press displays the address of the link.

21.09.2014 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill. Peter, I mean axis of Android, which is placed, in addition to phones already in tablets and other gadgets. And the browser Opera mini and Opera mobile, which sharpened by this axis. They do not have the status bar, but only the top line of the address. Of course, the number of the most active users, I already know by heart :) But anyway, this is not good.

21.09.2014 9:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, here begins the forum, but with a fairly tight schedule editing, and this automatically mean that the forum may require timely approval with the right to remove another's posts, or you may not get that started. And again, for a discussion of such action Modera in most forums entitled ban (which in the worst case).Nothing about it: this is done in order not to create a tense atmosphere. We are all humans. And moder including.
Accordingly, the modernization must be absolutely calm and adequate person.
I propose to discuss it.
P.S. His candidacy did not suggest, as he from time to time "explode."

21.09.2014 8:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In this case, I advise you to request the right to replace Peter photos in his LC.
Good luck :) raspravke have not always very good at it, though, and in this business for over 30 years ....

21.09.2014 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula apicipunctata tacky. Let's remove

21.09.2014 8:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula apicipunctata http://photozou.jp/photo/show/2452827/184853492

21.09.2014 8:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula apicipunctata http://photozou.jp/photo/show/2452827/184853492

21.09.2014 7:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I apologize in advance for the broken specimens. If you knew, with a quality of materials encountered in practice .......

21.09.2014 6:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter did not have to clean up the number of user comments. You just did not realize one thing. Quite often (at least to me) I have to come here with a smartphone, but in the mobile Opera simply do not have this state-of the line and nothing comes up.

21.09.2014 6:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add: caterpillars nuns and oak lasiocampidae not contained, so can not say anything. But, in my opinion, this method should apply to all hibernating caterpillars. I advise you to check the relevant topic on molbiole: molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=355726

21.09.2014 3:56, Yuri Semejkin:

I looked at pictures. With some agreement.

21.09.2014 2:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It depends on what kind of refrigerator :)
If the refrigerator is old, no function "No Frost" - it is not necessary. If modern, "No Frost" - means it is necessary (such refrigerators of a self, and that means that the moisture is removed from them). The main thing that was the temperature at which the moisture that's just there in the wool and the caterpillar did not turn into ice.This is just on the bottom shelf for vegetables.

21.09.2014 1:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Female.

21.09.2014 1:31, Yuri Semejkin:

He threw only for comparison with the # 33461: Gandaritis fixseni And so took this on individual raspravilku. Kohl will throw off here, then.

21.09.2014 1:18, Yuri Semejkin:

No Ira. They are different individuals, taken in different places of the forest botanical garden. Perhaps I dozagruzhu both individuals.

21.09.2014 0:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, about vatok. Is it necessary to moisten the substrate? .. Is this just a way for nuns andLasiocampa quercus? ..

20.09.2014 23:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Xestia c-nigrum, apparently. Photo after raspravilki.

20.09.2014 23:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! Both photos pupae group cropped to 1024x768. I like clarity. Sorry, I did not know this trick before =)

20.09.2014 23:18, Shamil Murtazin:

My aunt came out with a triangular pattern on the leading edge of the front wing.
Photos later.

20.09.2014 22:55, Alexander Belousov:

It is good that we decided to make it possible to edit! Sam seems like yesterday nakosyachil seriously! A clean way. A school in the form of adding the information - beguiled Lifetime caterpillars and Power thereof. There incorrigible. This Erebia turanica, if you can correct.

20.09.2014 22:53, Alexander Belousov:

Well, what are you to her, late, landed! We had to write a "kick in", ie It became "chock"! Translate easier!

20.09.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Thera obeliscata / Vitaly Gumenuk Thera variata / Irina Nikulina.

20.09.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thera variata is in my opinion in eight regions of 6 species and it fits most. No geography, but given that Vitaly almost all photos of Defense stand ...

20.09.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have this ognёvka in collections came from Malaysia. True, More himself, his is not defined. Maybe someone - some help in determining infa that view is not only in Borneo?

20.09.2014 22:39, Irina Nikulina:

And this is notThera variata?

20.09.2014 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrausta sanguinalis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.09.2014 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate. In the hope that someone - or something to confirm correct it.

20.09.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ecliptopera capitata / Irina Nikulina Ecliptopera silaceata / Basil Sergienko.

20.09.2014 22:18, Irina Nikulina:

ThisEcliptopera silaceataSee. photo in the group. Determined V. Sergienko

20.09.2014 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, okay. Now, I am talking about dimorphism page type :) And it's a personal infa will be based on personal observations, so to speak :)
P.S. At the same time, and the name of the Russian added :)

20.09.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I only know how to read five. But, with the spelling I have a space :) Especially with commas. Just as many, a space with butterflies :) must, of course, but do not always succeed (

20.09.2014 21:53, Peter Khramov:

Come on, that there ... We're aware ...

20.09.2014 21:51, Peter Khramov:

Here's an interesting question, by the way: Should moderators and other pover Find Topics Find Topics which is a website, follow the spelling (her) or not?

20.09.2014 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well tady do :) Good engine, I see. Sam did?
Good work :)

20.09.2014 21:37, Peter Khramov:

Basil, when you respond to the citation that you can quote most himself and edit. Ie This quote is only for convenience, not for protection. And you can carry everything on it and homemade.

20.09.2014 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, I will answer for Peter as I see it. It is necessary to introduce more Quote button. It can cook, brand, forumnye engines: usually IPB (Invision Power Board): http://www.invisionpower.com/apps/board/
The site - the home-made engine and do not know, maybe, whether it is done?
Peter, if you can do it, I fully subscribe to the proposal of Irene.Here is an example, as is customary in molbiole: it is mostly of the posts can be edited always (bottom stamped date and time editing), and can also be removed at all times. And all of it suits. Sometimes, when it comes in the wrong direction, people agree and delete their posts :)

20.09.2014 21:20, Peter Khramov:

I am waiting for the first example, when someone does not have time to edit, or, conversely, someone skhuliganil editing commentary when he was already answered, and then discuss specific examples. Ok?
Yes, and appeal to all: let's take a little more control, that we have to the website and how we make out.And thinking before writing / Post , not after.

20.09.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Photography has changed, considering the wishes of the workers. Pereraspravil. Unfortunately copies. It was originally broken, and after pereraspravki became worse. As is usually the case ... I do not blame me ...

20.09.2014 21:05, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, thank you for the good news. And what about the ban on editing after answering (seemingly is also discussed at the meeting)? If a person on a specific comment immediately responded, and he suddenly begins his post and then edit, or worse, delete) ..? As for the time of editing, I would have added - at least half an hour)

20.09.2014 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Little time: is time to edit, but to remove the left 15 minutes. It's my opinion.
NB. And delete all comments on editing here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33420 They're no longer needed.

20.09.2014 20:44, Peter Khramov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/community/29633.

20.09.2014 20:44, Peter Khramov:

Now, if you make a mistake, a typo, freshened up and changed their minds recently downloaded a comment, you can edit or delete. You need only click on the appropriate button next to the comment.

Notes:
- To delete a comment, or go to the edit page can be used only for 15 minutes after it is downloaded to the site.The process of editing is also limited in time - corrections must be uploaded no later than 20 minutes after the publication of the first version of the commentary.For example, if you switch to the edit page after 2 minutes after loading comment, you have another 18 to edit it (and do it as many times as possible within 18 minutes). If you have moved after 14 minutes - then you have 6 minutes to edit.- If you press "Delete" is not given any additional warnings. Comments will be removed immediately. Permanently. So pay attention to the red button bukovkami.
- Ability to edit is not only for the comments to fotam, but also to species supraspecific taxa, as well as to the themes in the Community and in blogs.If anyone thinks that the above mentioned terms a little / lot - write, discuss. I'm assuming that if within 15 minutes the man noticed a mistake or change your mind, it's okay, all is, he has the ability to edit your post. And if he changed his mind an hour - we write the second. This is clearly a new idea or an update.
Well, as always.You notice that something does not work or, conversely, because - write syudy.

20.09.2014 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time enough Give hour though, would be :) I mean the time interval for editing / deletion.

20.09.2014 19:56, Peter Khramov:

Well, you see, and now you can fix: -)

20.09.2014 19:47, Peter Khramov:

Can. But then the problem ceases to be creative. By the way, to translate your post by 09.20.2014 19:45 too, it will not be easy. Actually, there is the Russian sense of escape from the majority of people, I think ... But I kanesh realized at da. And at the same time too, I began to dig again: "While writing the post, the previous, just 'here commas meaning of the sentence was changed to absolutely otherworldly.

20.09.2014 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Peter :)

20.09.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, thank you :) Until post prior written just appeared. I fulfilled my dreams :)
Testing? :)

20.09.2014 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, "has died" can be written as "dead." That's all the problems: the meaning of the - well :)

20.09.2014 19:35, Peter Khramov:

I'm not special, but something like this: go to Maker, hop the twig and turn up heels respectively. And it almost verbatim. As appropriate within the meaning of expressions, and they did mulon. The notion that the Russian set of ornate expressions and in English, they say, a little, and they are mechanical - is false.The difference can be observed in some subjects, but the overall situation is rather close to the back.

20.09.2014 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lycaena dispar? It is flying in September?
Wait until transferring :)

20.09.2014 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Citizens are asked to pay more attention to the design of the text. Tyre (unless range) frames the space on both sides. And put spaces after punctuation, and not in front of them (in most cases).It's all in the future will enable automatically go to your commentaries and make AutoCorrect dashes and quotation marks to adequate programming symbols. And once when loading a commentary also make AutoCorrect. Ie writing "is necessary - give the photo" and not "give nado- photo".Otherwise, the program does not find anything, not replace, and will be on our website is the ugliness lie forever, because his hands are not all the same ... poredaktiruesh

20.09.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Okay, too pokochevryazhus :)
In the Russian language is still there: "reposed" , "Dala Oak" and "glued Fins" Here, too, creative problem :)
And then there are the so-called "Alternative Russian" (profanity) ... There's all pure from England is not unique.And only in American English there are similar within the meaning of the terms :)
"The great, the mighty, truthful and free Russian language." © IS Turgenev

20.09.2014 19:15, Peter Khramov:

When adding a commentary in the Russian version of the site, if this is not the Cyrillic comments (for example, there is only the Latin name of the species or even a smile), then the machine translated and comments as a translation into English. Ie copy-paste it in the window of the English commentary is not required.

20.09.2014 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It should be combined into a group if it is the same butterfly, which asked Irina :)

20.09.2014 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gandaritis fixseni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.09.2014 19:04, Irina Nikulina:

Gandaritis fixseniUre is not the same butterfly, as in the photo # 33461?

20.09.2014 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gandaritis fixseni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.09.2014 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

Gandaritis fixseni

20.09.2014 17:48, Peter Khramov:

Yes, and a collector section ought to throw something. And that in fact without an initial stuffing people will not understand and will not go ...

20.09.2014 16:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. Just I select somewhat different from your smartphone. Houses at me all login passwords to txt file. In the century :) This is me just today took the road, because the cache and cookies cleaned: the browser has become a fail. Well I noticed.

20.09.2014 15:53, Peter Khramov:

To select a password for kopipasta - double click. Depending on where we look letter, double click, and can capture the space after the password. If you have a point - do not capture anywhere, even in a notebook.

20.09.2014 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And another thing: take away point after the password. Stir it can: Now almost no one does not handle password drives. Kopipasta taxis and an extra point in the set is not necessary :) And a message that does not need it is needed. This is so, Council, logical simple :)

20.09.2014 14:50, Peter Khramov:

Attention modders: Room juzverej in comments are now not be displayed separately. But each comes with a link to the page. Place the cursor over the link, look at the number in the pop-Urla in the status bar.

20.09.2014 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do, Peter, of course. It is also considerably smaller than the standard male. By the way, when I picked her, she grabbed five more suitors seated side by side. Pheromones, you know :)

20.09.2014 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Incidentally, the point about demorfizmu very well be looking at the description page of the form. At least in the form of personal messages ...

20.09.2014 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Nothing extra here is not present. And holivarov also not seen by the ...

20.09.2014 13:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And for them, and for error. For all shorter. This feature is present on any resource, where there is communication between users: forums, etc. :)
N.B. In the evening, when I'm home, I'll replace this photo (ind. Is back on raspravilke) and then all the excess away it is necessary to be removed. There are other places to pick.A female Penna River, is really quite rarely get :)

20.09.2014 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Waiting with a popcorn basket for Lev's translation. Creative task! Love such.

20.09.2014 13:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morpho peleides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.09.2014 12:58, Irina Nikulina:

The chief of the Butterfly House said they surely didn't have P. pitmani, only P. hipponous and Р. polytes. So the ID is right) Bit later about the original stuff.

20.09.2014 12:45, Irina Nikulina:

So I talked to the chief of the Butterfly House, they didn't receive M.helenor so far, will get later. These were M. peleides.

20.09.2014 12:44, Peter Khramov:

I think that for the most errors. However, one must still see typos, yeah ...

20.09.2014 12:42, Peter Khramov:

People with regards classifications, I'm following in the first place the level of species at higher levels glitches may be greater (or rather, they may be more egregious). So that tells you if something goes wrong. However, at the level of species, kanesh, plenty of good ...

20.09.2014 12:38, Peter Khramov:

Yes, strange shtoto. Do not you see, why would a ...

20.09.2014 9:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who I am currently checked out of the train.
Good work. Only 2 letters from the post office came danymi reason :)

20.09.2014 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Wish me luck: I hope catches original tortricidaeAcleris logianawith a camera and fly during the day. The last time she was seen, but unfortunately forgot to bring camera and phone Fota ....... you know what :)

20.09.2014 7:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, come questions raspravke like this: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33447 Rising still here. And it seems the only copies. in the collection and to the same type and the first female begins ..... Believe: Penna River, we usually look at, but arrive to light for some reason only males.Yes, sinful, and hurried to the wings battened down: put the soaked and will soon replace the photo: not a problem and I have the opportunity. When at the same time put on a raspravilku dozen butterflies just not up to it, to comply with all formalities in practice.And besides, the number of chipped and flaws I do not like particularly to gloss over, and do not know to be honest. In general, I am happy in my collection copy of any quality, especially if it is rare. I do not have a gift shop, and a collection, which is going for decades. And it is that there is something there. Whereupon otklanivayus: leaving for a day of mushrooms.
No offense, Alexander :)

20.09.2014 3:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thanks for the elaboration. Now clear :)

20.09.2014 3:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, Peter. From this and holivar. Not always thought can be expressed briefly and gravely. For such cases, you need to edit, and "the air" ...

20.09.2014 0:32, Peter Khramov:

Until now, you can not ...

19.09.2014 23:18, Vladimir Deryabin:

Vasily, no, just a couple with such angle. I'll go to Agalina once more, will ask probable Lycaena virgaureae to pose one more time.

19.09.2014 23:15, Irina Nikulina:

Didn't colourized this. Probably the light is the thing.. It was quite dark, no sunshine, past 5... I've just checked other shots, different angles, less of this greeny tincture.

19.09.2014 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tough with such angle :) Suppose Lycaena virgaureae"" ???
Vladimir, any other shots of this specimen?

19.09.2014 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's so greeny or something. Never was such tincture here :)

19.09.2014 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very this, Irina. At least I saw it different :)

19.09.2014 23:01, Irina Nikulina:

Suprised... What's this "all"? I already added here aglaja from Far East http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/22032, or you meant this very specimen?

19.09.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My regrets. Feel sorry.

19.09.2014 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whoah, what a lep :)
Doesn't look at all our local from Moscow region.

19.09.2014 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill in (posts can not be edited until now).
If you do not catch fresh, then I soak it and shipped. Accidentally I found it at today :) I reservists: the entire winter, not disassemble disassemble :)

19.09.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have her way home from work drove not understand what is strangled, and manually with a stain then unfortunately there was no (
Hopefully better rooms, but this is only :)

19.09.2014 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

and so the expanded :)))

19.09.2014 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stigmatophora leacrita / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.09.2014 21:16, Irina Nikulina:

2 of 4 Stigmatophora species in Primorye clearly don't pass, 2 rest look quite alike but have distinctive features in underside and upperside forewings. They are described in V. V. Dubatolov's Guide to Lithosiinae:
http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lithosiinae/Stigmatophora_flava.htm and http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lithosiinae/Stigmatophora_leacrita.htm
So here's rather Stigmatophora leacrita (jpmoth describes leacrita nj;t with 6 marginal spots). Would be great though someone check this as well.

19.09.2014 21:15, Alexander Belousov:

Appreciate the humour!

19.09.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.09.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It seems Edistvennoe female in the gallery :)

19.09.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.09.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.09.2014 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.09.2014 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.09.2014 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.09.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.09.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

pennaria female doesn't have white eyespots in forewings, here two female cases: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1095-colotois-pennaria

19.09.2014 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

19.09.2014 18:26, Alex Dumchus:

Then what's the difference between subspecies? Genitalia only? Or not? Such a mess, worse than with machaons.Time to group them similarly to morphos!

19.09.2014 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pieris napi ? Female.

19.09.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems Carcharodus alceae? Will wait for moving, confirmation/disproof needed.

19.09.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Stigmatophora flava?

19.09.2014 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Me too. Alexandr, btw I got you letter, thanks. Mine seem to become dark as well :)
Aren't we mean, just funsters :)

19.09.2014 17:23, Alexander Belousov:

Sadly passed away.

19.09.2014 17:22, Alexander Belousov:

Mean you! :-)
Well, I do like!

19.09.2014 17:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Horisme corticata / Zoran Bozovic Horisme tersata / Basil Sergienko.

19.09.2014 17:10, Basil Sergienko:

This is tersata.

19.09.2014 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I was right saying to myself: "Don't mess with Far East" :(

19.09.2014 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis laodice Argynnis ruslana.

19.09.2014 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis laodice Argynnis ruslana.

19.09.2014 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, my fault, this is rather ruslana (

19.09.2014 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can't tell its gender. Female I see?

19.09.2014 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis paphia / Yuri Semejkin Argynnis laodice / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2014 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis paphia / Yuri Semejkin Argynnis laodice / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2014 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added new species.

19.09.2014 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The author missed the letter in the species name: Vivienna salma. Fixed.

19.09.2014 15:48, Enio Branco: This species is identified correctly.

19.09.2014 15:48, Enio Branco:

Vivienna salma

19.09.2014 15:47, Enio Branco:

Anisodes decussata

19.09.2014 15:47, Enio Branco: This species is identified correctly.

19.09.2014 15:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Support Argynnis adippe Rott.

19.09.2014 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here Schwarzenegger comes..........
Abyss for kidding :)

19.09.2014 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Dark dark people are digging...

19.09.2014 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Worth waiting for Evgeny. Doesn't look at all adippe from Moscow region.

19.09.2014 13:49, Irina Nikulina:

I'd put to Argynnis adippe female, not sure though as it's Far East)
Still it's tough to clear Far East adippe-like-xipe, coredippe, xanthodippe, vorax … The forewing pattern looks confusing at apex. I reread the whole old discussion http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=193914&st=50 beginning with adippe-like from Primorye added for ID http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=193914&view=findpost&p=665185, so thought to write this is xipe… Hope for help)

19.09.2014 13:46, Irina Nikulina:

Thanks to Evgeny, sure it's polyxenes. Hurried)

19.09.2014 13:39, Alex Dumchus:

In a dark dark room...

19.09.2014 13:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexandr! Don't mess warm with soft. Dark/light are just colour forms. Ssp. is more about location, geographical item. P. p. stabilis Rothschild & Jordan, 1906 is a spp. spread from Costa Rica to Panama, P. p. asterius Stoll, 1782 — US to Nicaragua. Nominative is described from Cuba.

19.09.2014 13:21, Alex Dumchus:

I've got also ssp. Stabilis same dark colour. Can add pics if needed. Whilst mine asterius is light.

19.09.2014 11:37, Peter Khramov:

General note: at least some "right" can only be the separation of species, and even then ... For all other taxa "right" does not exist.

19.09.2014 9:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Here, on the site there are 2 different types of Ourapteryx koreana and O. ussuriana But if you look on Google http://nature.baikal.ru/obj.shtml?obj=fauna&id=ourapteryx_koreana (header called Baikal Nature (krylohvostka Korean). That is the Two species are listed as synonyms. As well, -This one kind or two different yet?

19.09.2014 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.09.2014 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.09.2014 8:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.09.2014 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.09.2014 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio thoas / Irina Nikulina Papilio polyxenes / Eugene Karolinskiy.

19.09.2014 5:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

polyxenes it is, so moving. My fault: didn't notice. First of all thoas has no such bright, red eyespots (at least mine have no any).

19.09.2014 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maria bears all the output is quite simple. We had to just fill some box with cotton wool, put the goose and put into the refrigerator, on the bottom shelf, "vegetable" or some other cool place until spring. And with the emergence of first leaves of spring to get to the finish feeding and pupate.For the Defense presented the following fodder plants: Euphorbia, chernokoren, sorrel, plantain, cinquefoil, pickerel, Veinik, hawkweed, Dandelion, Kulbaba, Ragwort, Yarrow. Here and offer them :) Imago had already come out in May and June."Country Bear": very interesting for the suburbs views and worth a try, right :)
I add that I had been looking at us, but did not find even once ....
Just keep in mind for the future :)
By the way: Now I abuse myself. for not having taken a goose Cuculia asteris in the Vladimir region., but only sfotal: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32718 Until now, I can not forgive myself (((

19.09.2014 1:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO polyxenes

18.09.2014 22:41, Maria Pozdnova:

Unfortunately with breeding, I do not. I'm not an expert.

18.09.2014 22:24, Irina Nikulina:

Thanks for the answer, Basil. Yes, I have found here http://outdoor.geocities.jp/nabenight/4negurousubeninami.html unlike them underside (PC). But, unfortunately, I remove the underside failed, it would be interesting to make sure ..

18.09.2014 21:33, Basil Sergienko:

I wrote, likely believing blue. These two kinds of apparently twins who differ in the reverse side of the front wings (see. The Japanese) Here are the images shown here are close http://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42namisyaku2.html

18.09.2014 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Basil Sergienko.

18.09.2014 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:)

18.09.2014 20:09, Irina Nikulina:

Of course, I mean Basil Sergienko, who defined this butterfly

18.09.2014 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, Basil and 2 here so very confused, to be honest :)
Yes, I really looked, only to endure did not dare, I do not know Primorye simple.
It is not only the Japanese have: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=196365
And many more where ....

18.09.2014 20:02, Peter Khramov:

It is necessary, but not here, and blozhik. As zabatsat for public use - it will have to do.

18.09.2014 19:51, Irina Nikulina:

In Primorye, the only species of the genus by Photoscotosia Sinev. Do not dare to write it, it seemed that she jpmoth several different looks .. picture atrostrigata from our website (Yu Semeykina) much more similar to the Japanese photo) But my much more like a Photoscotosia lucicolens (Butler, 1878), which is Sinev in Primorye not dwell on the site and type there. But the Japanese site has -http: //mushisukidesu.cocolog-nifty.com / blog / 2012/08 / 5-58c5.html, http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Larentiinae/Photoscotosia_lucicolens.html, http://www.geocities.jp/otatsugio/ga/749-122- oonegurousubeni.html. Basil, look, please

18.09.2014 19:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucorhoe unduliferaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

18.09.2014 19:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Photoscotosia atrostrigata.

18.09.2014 19:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

18.09.2014 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The inaccurate?

18.09.2014 19:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucorhoe unduliferaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

18.09.2014 19:26, Basil Sergienko:

Glaucorhoe unduliferaria

18.09.2014 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mёschёra never ends, but spring is only once a year and transient :)

18.09.2014 19:20, Basil Sergienko:

Rather Photoscotosia atrostrigata

18.09.2014 18:58, Peter Khramov:

Well, here it or Meshchora or spring. Choose ...

18.09.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not even know what this photo Peacock (not considered). Madly I want just to spring never ended :) dreams all dreams ......

18.09.2014 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleksanr, everything is fine :)
Already there is to my knowledge (Proklov) ...... Sinev long time it is time to finalize.

18.09.2014 17:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

For Region 8 is not :)))

18.09.2014 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you. First there from Moscow, however :)

18.09.2014 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea seriata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

18.09.2014 17:09, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea seriata

18.09.2014 16:44, Irina Nikulina:

The picture could be called "In search of food") This year the end of August on the vine kirkazon Manchurian leaves that feed on caterpillars altsinoya, almost gone.At my request, the Jura Semeykin hard to find leaves to feed taken for pupation) This here is the invasion has been observed for the second consecutive year, but last year, even in the middle of September, the leaves were still. Aboriginal podtverzhdayut- 2014 broke the record last year in the number of tracks)

18.09.2014 16:43, Irina Nikulina:

Previously seen on the tracks altsinoya aristolochiaceae plodah- "bananas". This year, apparently, and it came to fruit)

18.09.2014 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's interesting: so hang .... More top three weeks ago to the balcony, she flew to me :)

18.09.2014 15:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula marginepunctata ?

18.09.2014 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

All on the "CON" :))

18.09.2014 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia contigua / Alexandr Zhakov Lacanobia contrastata / Basil Sergienko.

18.09.2014 14:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia contigua / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.09.2014 13:02, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, I was inclined to it, considered it and thalassina, but did not dare write - because of the fray decent

18.09.2014 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In short, a nightmare, of course;)))

18.09.2014 11:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Irina, not Depressaria ultimella, he saw, but was too lazy to touch it in appearance head broke all inaccurate. :)))

18.09.2014 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Algorithm vystaleniya? Just wondering ...... Although inaccurate ???

18.09.2014 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Depressaria radiella / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Depressaria ultimella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2014 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Depressaria radiella / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Depressaria ultimella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2014 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris shepherdana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.09.2014 8:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If necessary, drag here.

18.09.2014 7:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course :) And I'm here for days in isolation "as a curse" :)

18.09.2014 7:14, Alexander Belousov:

See how profitable work at home!

18.09.2014 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vosplzovalsya, means that I am still at work :)
Well, it means I will have with 108 photos :)
P.S. And I and samochki with white dots on a red sling front wing there :)

18.09.2014 6:36, Alexander Belousov:

Vasily sorry withheld! With you in the male raspravke.

18.09.2014 2:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good photo. Spiritual ... Thank you :)
Irina, do not worry about the 105th Admiral :)
I looked at everyone and said that normally there is not straightened. Then will come home, and when the 106th Admiral in two perspectives :))))

18.09.2014 2:20, Peter Khramov:

Good gizmo.

18.09.2014 2:16, Irina Nikulina:

I do not know whether the cooler, but I liked more shepherdana)

18.09.2014 1:59, Irina Nikulina:

Well, let it not delayed on the way)))

18.09.2014 1:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

In-in, 50 to 50. All that is determined, you yourself have long identified. and there was one headache, it is necessary to wait for the inspiration to find :)))

18.09.2014 1:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris, but the look? likely rhombana, but it may be something steeper.

18.09.2014 1:51, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Sasha, and I was looking for it in Apotomis) A Endothenia we Sinev at 5 all, the choice is small. if netochnye- marginana and gentianaeana

18.09.2014 1:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

It Endothenia and views? I will not tell from the photo that you have? Varish completely identical, and receives various types. :(

18.09.2014 1:35, Irina Nikulina:

Last summer, leaving a breath) Once the do not call buddleyu David - and "babochkovy bush", and "a magnet for butterflies" and "paradise for butterflies") - planting, be sure! Blooms until late September, the strong smell of honey and all that still fly, gathered her in a warm September day) I forgave my 105th Admiral Online))

18.09.2014 1:29, Peter Khramov:

And the dog with them. Cool, he wrote.

18.09.2014 1:16, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, you're right. Corrected.

18.09.2014 1:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Alex Dumchus.

18.09.2014 1:14, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, mine Tortricidae are waiting for you much)) They do want to get moved somewhere))

18.09.2014 1:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

My small report on the last trip. About insects almost nothing. So, on the night pochitat.http: //animals-nn.ru/forum/index.php? Showtopic = 1790

18.09.2014 1:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

So you're having fun, I want to move as well :)))

18.09.2014 1:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If not hipponous but turns out pitmani, please ask for male as well. Nothing of pitmani at all!!! Will prepare that and check.

18.09.2014 1:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh, that's going :) Imho enough for moving :)

18.09.2014 1:00, Irina Nikulina:

Yeah, well understood, I shifted responsibility to men))) Keeping myself safe from being "the opposite" to "hero and fine")))
Dmitry, I'll ask about specimen's body, as I got right, any female of the species even not hipponous?

18.09.2014 0:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Such, though not seen: I will not say it's right. Well I do not fit me dead, impaled on a pin with a live butterfly, green leaves of the plant to any :)

18.09.2014 0:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

According to the algorithm that was Alexandr Dumchus. :)))
Irina with 3rd version, Alexandr offered 1 not surely, Dmitry was sure.
Should have two fields, the identifier and who confirmed first :))) Then they share the responsibility :)))

18.09.2014 0:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK. I will continue to tag. Where to write "del" means varintov but to remove not :)

18.09.2014 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Photographic too dofiga rassazhennymi with the leaves and butterflies. And vzabrugah identity must have been just a little earlier.

18.09.2014 0:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes ... But there is seen painted butterfly (series where Antonova took part), artist / s to remember. How will the house: I can clarify. I have them still with a cloudless, Soviet childhood there :)

18.09.2014 0:47, Peter Khramov:

You can check the algorithm of naming the identifier by Irina's link below. The difference is easy, who was named identifier would become most responsible. If ID was right, so he/she is hero and fine. If not, the opposite.

18.09.2014 0:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Irina offered 3 for ID. Alexandr even not surely chose one, the right. I just supported his guess.

18.09.2014 0:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is it possible to ask for this specimen's body, to science? Couldn't find anywhere female genitalia of this species.

18.09.2014 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Come on, cards that, if the Soviet did not see ...

18.09.2014 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Remove.

18.09.2014 0:37, Irina Nikulina:

I'll torture him near days for sure, couldn't reach by phone today. Very curious about the final diagnosis))

18.09.2014 0:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, I agree. Can't object :) It does matter for me and moving who first said Papilio hipponous whilst you and Alexandr just upheld the thought. This is my algorithm of moving. Seems here anyway some special and not obvious rules rule:)

18.09.2014 0:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If to be precise to the end, butterfly houses get 99% Asian leps from the Philippines, so this should be hipponous. But if the original stuff (pupae) were from Thailand, this is Papilio pitmani Elwes & de Niceville,[1887]. Matters where the pupae are from. Cool anyway even if this one is Papilio hipponous.

18.09.2014 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A very original version of the background to the expanded and dried, butterfly collector :)

18.09.2014 0:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Kindergarten indeed. Does it really matter who identified? Then it was Alexandr Dumchus.

18.09.2014 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, if you can, remove my foty that I have marked for deletion. Apat do not want to, but it is necessary to remove the junk. Replace them still fail. And already there are the best of those same places :)

18.09.2014 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK. No argue with such a switch :)

17.09.2014 23:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.09.2014 23:46, Irina Nikulina:

Can't agree) If follow the algorithm Petr offered http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/30976, then Dmitry is the author to note) It's already a pleasure for me not to fail in the family not quite known to me and to have a right guess) I leaned more to that one. (Also I checked the link below, didn't get what's not good with Nematopogon)

17.09.2014 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I noted Irina as identifier as she was first who proposed.

17.09.2014 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio hipponous / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.09.2014 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.09.2014 23:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

hipponous female tentatively identified

17.09.2014 22:13, Peter Khramov:

These are consequences of a) large numbers and b) that dealt with the case maker.

17.09.2014 21:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, Alexander! This problem has long been annoying me too. Apparently "something is rotten in the state of Denmark", ie in our "classification", a feeling that it tried to cross a snake and a hedgehog. In other words at the same time different approaches to classification at the level of families, subfamilies. Repeatedly wondered, trying to find something, going from the highest ranks!

17.09.2014 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, almost 6 cm. In scope :)

17.09.2014 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nearly no chance to get underside. To tentatively identified or wait?

17.09.2014 20:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil, neighing over your kosmmentom ambiguous. A friend named Pronuba - tin))))

17.09.2014 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

hipponous female. Underside needed for 100% sure.

17.09.2014 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pronuba something flies .... Surely not find it :) That's all the time they arrive shabby: false climb wherever falling :)

17.09.2014 20:24, Alex Dumchus:

As Irina said right, It's most likely P.hipponous. Red eyespots are confusing, that's all. Mine of the collection don't have front eyespots, they're all males though. This looks female. Not polytes at least, I checked all mine, both collected myself and got from somewhere, don't look like. This marvel doesn't look any other else in Southeast Asia.
Not a rare species (quite rare compared to polytes) but isn't often to be raised. Here's something to check out: http://swallowtails.net/P_hipponous.htm

17.09.2014 20:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In Borneo, a man in the eye (in the eyeball!) Bug bites. The view was still the (alcoholic boxer). Me in a mole on the belly, in the same place, the wasp shied away - could not sleep all night, in the heat and cold. After 2 days, the mole fell out. It is necessary to patent method for removing moles.

17.09.2014 20:04, Basil Sergienko:

The list of species of this genus have scriturosa, that is synonymous with this

17.09.2014 20:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

The first image in the network. :)))

17.09.2014 20:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

17.09.2014 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Basil Sergienko.

17.09.2014 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

17.09.2014 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

17.09.2014 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ethmia pusiella Ethmia candidella.

17.09.2014 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ethmia pusiella Ethmia candidella.

17.09.2014 19:54, Evgeny Komarov:

I fucked this pleasure in the Far East this year! Everything has gone to bed, the one I like a fool waiting for something. Here and waited moth's ear. Fifteen minutes tweezers tried to pull it out, barely coped! I do not know about noktui - I moth is quite enough!

17.09.2014 5:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

17.09.2014 5:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

17.09.2014 5:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

First I was confused with these yellow "wedges" in its forewings(
Bad butterfly houses usually have "just some leps", no any original data, here could be very helpful imho.

17.09.2014 4:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gluck corrected: I did not determine yet :)

17.09.2014 4:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Denis Tumanov.

17.09.2014 4:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Denis Tumanov.

17.09.2014 4:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Greetings from Meshchora :) Once there would have traveled, always someone to bring one of those edges.
View up to its Russian name: "Larentsiya autumn"
Flight of adults we have going on in September and October.

17.09.2014 4:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris napi / Imago / Yuri Semejkin Pieris melete / Female / Irina Nikulina.

17.09.2014 4:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not P. napi uniquely yesterday seen enough of the local :)
Irina law. I stand.

17.09.2014 2:24, Irina Nikulina:

Pieris meletefemale spring generation

16.09.2014 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Emmelina monodactyla / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2014 22:24, Irina Nikulina:

Took that already, no this species anywhere for some reason. The only one of those Yury shot stays undetermined) Can be some рolytes subspecies... Also considered Papilio hipponous and Papilio prexaspes duboisi, this is a task for Dmitry and Alexandr Dumchus though) Easier to ask the very chief of the Butterfly House in Vladivostok, we'll do if doesn't get identified.

16.09.2014 21:19, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps I am mistaken, but it seems to me that it is not radiella .. To me she seems more like aDepressaria ultimella, radiella lighter and there is a dark rim around the edge cr. and root .. What do you say?

16.09.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, Alexander, then I slukavil :) This dry specimens. a mattress. Just landing in nature at this same atlas. Why did I put it was the first comment, and the hand is given for illustrative purposes. The wingspan is impressive: a quarter of a meter (25 cm.) :)
Peter, on the pins that even such a whopper more than №3 pins are not needed :)

16.09.2014 20:31, Alex Dumchus:

As I explained in the Dominican Republic and Mexico - the name "Caribbean" sea comes from the word "kanibskoe", ie We lived there cannibals. Ate probably ... :)

16.09.2014 20:27, Alex Dumchus:

Hybrid, a hybrid. Beautiful !!!

16.09.2014 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

16.09.2014 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

16.09.2014 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well this is a live butterfly on her than have to sit, or branch, or Vasina hand. :)))

16.09.2014 17:21, Peter Khramov:

Since Image is not a separate / full object on the site, to lay hands, line, copies of both males and females, and stuff like that - it is not recommended. I would like to draw attention to the size - Old in the comments.

16.09.2014 14:08, Peter Khramov:

There is not a hybrid?

16.09.2014 14:07, Peter Khramov:

Butterfly houses often have same species, maybe this could be a clue...

16.09.2014 13:07, Peter Khramov:

What a handsome man. Doesn't look English at all.

16.09.2014 10:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, photo 29682 and 29684 as a separate group.
as well as all of the attributes from the photos on display.
thank.

16.09.2014 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This joke was inspired by a comment :)
In fact, it is worth trying to bring.
An interesting finding ...

16.09.2014 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Titanic, radical black, smuggled goods. Kisa, it does not remind you anything?" © O. Bender :)))

16.09.2014 8:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, Alexandr's 100% right :)
I always got them such: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/29715

16.09.2014 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:))) Never they flew into ear. Yes to mouth though, so you sit and spit them out, leps, midges and others. If Chrysopidae flies into, then you spit it out for a week. Not tasty )))) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrysopidae

16.09.2014 7:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Comibaena delicator / Evgeny Komarov Comibaena tancrei / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.09.2014 7:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put determined the Irina. I think it will be correct.

16.09.2014 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Limenitis moltrechti / Evgeny Komarov Limenitis amphyssa / Irina Nikulina.

16.09.2014 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hand not children, and my ...... laid out for understanding the size of the "birds" :)

16.09.2014 7:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Thank you, Alex! I agree! Carry!

16.09.2014 7:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! Endure, my school, Irina right!

16.09.2014 6:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cautious guess with a small probability, Papilio polytes ??
Is its origin unknown, isn't? I think proved location could help......

16.09.2014 6:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

16.09.2014 6:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

16.09.2014 6:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

16.09.2014 6:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

16.09.2014 6:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

16.09.2014 6:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

16.09.2014 3:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio nephelus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.09.2014 3:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio nephelus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.09.2014 1:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

16.09.2014 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Throw in the mail, "including" Interesting.

16.09.2014 1:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Troides rhadamantus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

16.09.2014 1:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.09.2014 1:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nothing is broken up and dissipated. We will work to prepare the winter ognevkoobraznym area. People Nino remained, including and spices (whom I was not myself, and they have not counted).

16.09.2014 1:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

rhadamantus

16.09.2014 1:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female

16.09.2014 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Exact no more likely to yes. Mats on the photo does not define precisely, he speaks his mind. what he sees. The exact definition of this genus is considered to be welded specimens.

15.09.2014 23:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Who never caught at light, would be horrified, who did, just laugh. 1cm, funny. When Noctuidae once dives into your ear you then stop your ears with cotton wool every time you see it. :))

15.09.2014 23:28, Yuri Semejkin:

No any. It either flies or rests like this.

15.09.2014 23:27, Lev Bely:



The hero of the day stayed for 48 hours in the ear of a 43-year-old Brit from Aylesbury, UK. Now it “oscares” on a bookshelf at the poor man's home.

As BBC reports, Robert Fielding inadvertently pushed the moth deep into his ear canal whilst peacefully reading his tablet computer in bed.

Robert Fielding sought help in A&E but they couldn't removed the moth as it stuck quite deep. He had to wait for two days for some specialized help in another hospital.

Now the moth takes a place of honour on a bookshelf at Fielding's home. He himself says it was “horrible sensation” to have a moth stuck in ear.

“It was right by my ear drum so it was making such a loud noise,” he said.

“It was a horrible sensation. It was like an annoying tickle, but it was so spontaneous. I was jumping and twitching all the time.”



“I certainly kept the taxi driver amused on the way to hospital.”

At his first check-up by nurses the moth was still alive as they could see its leg moving inside. Few hours later the insect stopped moving which could mean it passed away.

However Fielding had to wait for two more days until Oxford specialists get the moth out of a man's ear.

“It made me feel quite ill and it affected my balance, so I had to miss my cousin's wedding,” Mr Fielding said.

“It was really painful and there was a horrible 'pop' as it came out in one go.”

“My kids found it amusing — as soon as I brought it home my son grabbed it and took it round to all his friend's houses to show them.”

BBC News, http://www.bbc.com
Photo 1: Robert Fielding, http://www.bbc.com
Photo 2: the moth stuck in ear for two days, Robert Fielding, http://www.bbc.com

15.09.2014 22:45, Peter Khramov:

Phoned and explained what was happening. Together with the replacement of ph.

15.09.2014 21:44, Vladimir Deryabin:

Thank you.
In samdele - only NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA not see for about a month - the rest of the butterfly, which saw in May, August - fly.
Nitekrylka (Nemoptera sinuata) does not apply to the butterflies? ... Also I met her here.

15.09.2014 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

"Or" - if you do not know in what superfamily, you can not see it necessary to scroll through all of the superfamily with scroll. but you can not make another version of the list of families. nadsemestvami divided. It will be easier to search.

15.09.2014 21:37, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. I understand nothing. Consider that I particularly blunt. I have a list in Verde him more general descriptions of the places for indeterminate species. I can throw you in the mail. And do with it what you want ...

15.09.2014 21:34, Peter Khramov:

Unleashed.

15.09.2014 21:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.09.2014 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.09.2014 21:18, Vladimir Deryabin:

The underside of the wings of the same specimen is shown in the photo 33366. Meanwhile in Bulgaria everything is still flying. Here storks flying. Waiting spotted eagles, harriers, even some waders.

15.09.2014 21:15, Peter Khramov:

With doubles, again, I realized. About hawk moths - you mean that the need for Russian name? Or?

15.09.2014 21:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, there can be only three optionsPolyommatus escheri, P. icarus and P. thersites. While the latter is probably necessary to eliminate it entirely different hue. That's all. If it was not abnormal year, you can safely be put on escheri, but I do not know this kind, so probably will remain uncertain. If Eugene did not tell the weighty word. :))

15.09.2014 21:08, Peter Khramov:

Remove excess.

15.09.2014 21:08, Peter Khramov:

Only this photo from the band to be separated, right?

15.09.2014 21:06, Peter Khramov:

Can. In Excel. There's also written. If you have enough disk imaging, then the 50-150 instances it will take about 10 minutes Well, for the first time, maybe 20. This is the same list but in a certain format in advance. Truncated. Try it.

15.09.2014 21:06, Alex Dumchus:

PS. I do not think (IMHO) that the section "Collection" will be in great demand.
Let me explain why: the three years of cooperation with the site, I made more than 1300 photons (by the way all copies except natural - from my collection). Well, remove the natural and underside. Will be approximately 700-800, and there are copies, which I do not Fota, asthey were already present on the site, well Palaearctic there are different banal ... And what work only describe my 1000 copies. And there are much bigger collection ... How much time to kill, to describe it all, if you are not retired?
The idea, of course, is good, but there are suspicions that all will go to toot ....

15.09.2014 21:03, Irina Nikulina:

So after all be precisely defined Amphipoea photo? ... Or is too imprecise to put in? (I also have a couple Amphipoea of ​​Primorye, is put to the accumulation of material on the race?)

15.09.2014 20:54, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. You just imagine that it is administered 50-150 names. Well this is how much time to kill zrya.Tut 5 fotami suffer. If only I had this matter and engaged. Is it possible to "announce the entire list, please" ... in one fell swoop.

15.09.2014 20:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not take in Icarus move. Even under the shooting :) "Stuffed", you know ........

15.09.2014 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Only the method of exclusion that can fly in September in Bulgaria, but in general it is Icarus and Icarus in Bulgaria :)

15.09.2014 20:44, Peter Khramov:

Alexander Collections section there is an option exchange. And there foty optional.

15.09.2014 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, Vasily appreciates the colours of this specimen, moths from Moscow region are more pale. As for photo editor, he uses that himself. That was not criticism but admiration :))

15.09.2014 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here without ispod .... The road to nowhere on my (

15.09.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Inadequate for "vagrants" in the street :) That is what I mean :) The event expensive .........
Just organizers know personally :)

15.09.2014 20:14, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, I'm not opposed to dialogue. Just I argue that prices are inadequate.

15.09.2014 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, there is the main communication. And the rest will follow!

15.09.2014 20:00, Shamil Murtazin:

I repeat the request about the department as a separate group.
3 double

15.09.2014 19:47, Alex Dumchus:

Well, I looked foty. Prices are absolutely affordable! God forgive me, the community or those who are there to sell - at any price much cheaper online. And with the shipment.Who has not seen ph bursy- give examples: Podalirius -350 p Orifov Juno (who do not know -the most conventional bananas from Ty to Emirates) - 300-350 p Kanishka Canazei (Admiral Blue) - 600 rubles, Ulysses from 400 to 1200 (males), A.coon- 900, painted lady (although Canada) 300 M.peleides (or helenor) - 800-900 ... gelikonisov hybrids, which I received from Costa Rica, if memory serves on 3 4 ye - 600 well, etc.A katokaly 500 p, something Well, I let them all summer? Oh, I forgot - Basil - oleander brazhnik- 450-600. (I took African 5 ye).
This four - prices based on inflation? If I had butterflies acquired at such prices - I would have long ago ruined, though not rogue.Peter, a question! it would be necessary to make not only a section of the collection and more urgent - the section of the exchange, not necessarily with fotami enough to indicate the state of copies. I have a few years accumulated a lot of the tropics, others also have something to exchange. You can upload lists.
And then I wrote on molbiole- already answered by 2 people. With one, however, establish ...If anyone reads this post and who are interested to change (not to buy, sell !!!), write to me on e-mail

15.09.2014 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

15.09.2014 18:29, Yuriy Karpov:

Lycaena helle confirm.

15.09.2014 18:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siproeta stelenes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 18:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio polytes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 18:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic Alexandr Zhakov.

15.09.2014 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila tolli / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.09.2014 18:15, Alex Dumchus:

Siproeta stelenes

15.09.2014 18:14, Alex Dumchus:

Looks rather of M.helenor. Upperside?

15.09.2014 18:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

15.09.2014 18:10, Alex Dumchus:

Similarly polytes, likely P. p. alphenor

15.09.2014 17:58, Yuriy Karpov:

Don't edit pics, just crop.

15.09.2014 17:29, Irina Nikulina:

Reserves http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26125. Though different dates shooting a butterfly - another background. Perhaps we should leave one photo (it seems it is primary)

15.09.2014 17:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Understood

15.09.2014 17:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 17:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Morpho peleides ? Identified by Ira Nikulina.

15.09.2014 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Jury will determine who will choose from one of these two kinds :))

15.09.2014 17:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Siproeta stelenes? Ira defined Nikulin

15.09.2014 16:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Troides aeacus or Tr. rhadamantus? Ira defined Nikulin

15.09.2014 16:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Papilio polytes? Ira defined Nikulin

15.09.2014 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.09.2014 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 15:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.09.2014 15:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Buck

15.09.2014 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 15:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Define: Ira Nikulin

15.09.2014 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I forgot to add: should leave approximately 1-2 weeks. So that the result of the phenomenon Site handsome, I think "not far off" :)

15.09.2014 13:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, for example, try to find the family of hawk moths? not knowing superfamily, even knowing Latin Sphingidae. Also, in the autumn lasiocampidae Lemoniidae, but there is still swirling. Model race Lemonia now Brahmaeidae. If you dig such a lot. And different taxa at one level.Example: Level 1 squad (superfamily) - Level 2 superfamily (semeytva) - Level 3 family (and here begins discrepancies where the subfamily where kind, and where both, and money had to be) well and then went something like it born that way tribe view peremeshku where both. Frankly speaking, I do not know how all this bring in the divine form, but would hotelo.We have to think together :)))

15.09.2014 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I too clever :)

15.09.2014 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I add: in the family we have in the region of 16 species and some of questionable location. Checked by the nature of all the options (luckily there where), and agree with Irina :)

15.09.2014 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

The complex includes many gelihoidny semeyst that are not gelehiidami. Clever :)))

15.09.2014 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gelechioidea is not quite 100% So this meant :)

15.09.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil is not 100% gelehiida :)) It's as you like: Elachistidae or Depressariidae, and not so long ago Oecophoridae, but Gelechiidae. Rod is also very complex in appearance to determine, I have not looked, but there are 5 species of these should be a close race and have :)))

15.09.2014 13:06, Peter Khramov:

About duplicates realized boom understand. As for hard to find - I do not understand, to be specified.

15.09.2014 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria radiella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is at the same gelehida 100%
Despite this I think that the definition of true :)

15.09.2014 12:53, Irina Nikulina:

I supposeDepressaria radiella

15.09.2014 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, when I did not stand not having checked the definition of who is not defined. Even if the definition without question. And if you can not stand. It means there is doubt or need to spend a lot of time checking. Transfer to the species, to me, is not a mechanical process, and creative :)))

15.09.2014 12:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I remember a remark to him one day on beetles did: one and the same, put up there for the definition of each year, and from one place. Even a list of similar species (of 4) this resulted in the clearing as I know this particular area since childhood and has heart :)

15.09.2014 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, we have (8) of 4 types: checked and like the definition of habit Irina true :)

15.09.2014 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

He defines a lot, and a very large percentage of hits for the photographer. He did a lot of takes. Before. mobiole often exhibited on the determination. And then define all :)))

15.09.2014 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ortholepis betulae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Absolutely the right thing. We all know the author :) I wonder who it defined?

15.09.2014 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rod is very complex, all resemble each other, Vasily rights that need to cook. :)

15.09.2014 12:13, Peter Khramov:

While down only in the geography instance. And about the samples - yes, we'll do a more complete list of countries.

15.09.2014 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phycitodes binaevella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phycitodes binaevella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.09.2014 12:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

15.09.2014 12:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

15.09.2014 12:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

To be honest, for this kind of photos can not be determined, only guesses. :(

15.09.2014 12:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

15.09.2014 12:08, Irina Nikulina:

Ortholepis betulae?

15.09.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, my hat, and I apologize as always :) I was wrong (transfer until I: wait for Alexander.

15.09.2014 11:52, Irina Nikulina:

Hands reached last) And I think it's not so scary and it's another family ... I supposePhycitodes binaevella

15.09.2014 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I forgot to write it :)
And in fact almost finished my own harvest season (
Now the winter will be, smoothing exotics, and their, freshly caught local has not (
That's why I feel sad ......

15.09.2014 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How bright they are: don't think of this species first. Our local in Moscow region are way more modest in coloration :)

15.09.2014 10:00, Yuriy Karpov:

All were shot and caught.

15.09.2014 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, in my not being at the seminary, you lost a lot in commercial terms with the store.
They immediately gathered in one place a lot of great people and entomological "Entomon", with their not very democratic prices worked "with a bang" ....

15.09.2014 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The event ended. I want to provide a link here for those who have not been there for some reason: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=542083
And to say thank you to the organizers. The great thing is people do.
NB. And I go on vacation I probably did not happen :)

15.09.2014 6:37, Alexander Belousov:

Oh, and one more question! Where do I enter my Kazakhstan? Only then Russia and Europe! Asia is planned in the parameters of the search?

15.09.2014 6:32, Alexander Belousov:

Thank you, Peter, I think we shall understand the sly. Winter up-on-the-olgaya!

15.09.2014 5:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Available in three dolls. I decided to try to bring the imago.

15.09.2014 5:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not see the person. I write in the mail.

15.09.2014 0:28, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

15.09.2014 0:09, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, are in Group 2 of different species, it's time to unleash)

15.09.2014 0:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, there probably mistake this imageComibaena tancrei

14.09.2014 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Alexander,
1. With regard to Fig- and others - you are familiar with the site section "catalog"? This is an analogue of working with instances of collectors. If you are unfamiliar - will charge / call each other, talk. A short, there is a "catalog" and have a "classification". That now is, for instance - is an analogue of "catalog".What you offer (and we do, too) - analog "classification". For both species, and in particular, for instances where you want to "catalog", but after the paper books and knigopodobnyh sites is not immediately be clear (force of habit).
2. whose collections are available - is now seen in parameter "Curator". And by the way, I'm not sure that this infa should be available to all.I propose to discuss who have any opinion on this matter.
3. Udalyalki / redaktirovalki instance properties, including photo - in the near future (adapted to the new features now).

14.09.2014 22:12, Peter Khramov:

Thus, Nizhny Novgorod diaspora finally dispersed ...

14.09.2014 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Collector profile potestit do not forget to leave. And, Basil, you're about to Bursa istochink / publication managed today to ask?

14.09.2014 20:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

While not appear Poecilocampa populi, the season is not over. We have it very rannee- October 7. So once a month season !!!

14.09.2014 20:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dmitry Pozhogin - for no show at the exhibition
When you organize a trade fair - and then leave. I probably tie with butterflies and leaving the threads. These are the results of the holiday.

14.09.2014 16:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyles euphorbiae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.09.2014 13:26, Yuri Semejkin:

It seems to have enough and pupae, but decided to download. Just this is the first doll found specifically on Aristolochia manshuriensis over the years. It is not exuvium. Damage caused by some insects may still at the stage of caterpillar.

14.09.2014 12:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, faced with the fact that in the "Classification" we do not have a full order, is to put it mildly, difficult to find anything, but the main one and the same taxon, appear in the rank of families and subfamilies in other families, the example Lymantriidae and Lymantriinae, Arctiidae and Arctiinae. This major taxa very popular with butterflies and looking in their classification shizeyut people. it is necessary to resolve this. :))

14.09.2014 11:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomaspilis marginata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.09.2014 11:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Thalera fimbrialis / Vitaly Gumenuk Hemithea aestivaria / Basil Sergienko.

14.09.2014 10:49, Evgeny Komarov:

I think that finally nuchno for something to come to birth Chrysozephyrus Shirôzu & Yamamoto, 1956 and Neozephyrus Sibatani & Ito, 1942. As of today, we view brillantinus (Staudinger, 1887) is in Neozephyrus and Chrysozephyrus. However in this description and illustrations have Neozephyrus, and Chrysozephyrus not. But he kind of Neozephyrus, illustrated with three species left without the title photo.The situation is exactly the opposite with smaragdinus (Bremer, 1861), which is also located here and there, but the descriptions and illustrations in the genus Chrysozephyrus. Also forked uedai Koiwaya, 2003 - present in both genders (without illyustatsy and descriptions). And as synonyms in this situation, I have said nothing.I do not presume to talk about fidelity-infidelity tribal affiliation, there are specialists, but to be on the site should not be! To discuss !!!

14.09.2014 10:18, Basil Sergienko:

I'm for marginata

14.09.2014 10:06, Basil Sergienko:

It is, in fact, Hemithea aestivaria. Here you can still somehow be determined, but photos from this angle, and if put, it is with the other photos of this specimen. Otherwise do not understand the meaning of the photo.

14.09.2014 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I decided to take a timeout. I hope that this is temporary and everything will fall into place. You just have to understand the specific issues relating to the site ... and not only. And for this we need to live in isolation. Honestly: tired. Sorry ... And good luck :)

14.09.2014 7:35, Alexander Belousov:

I tried and did not understand anything! Incomprehensible tree tabs (pages) - if at all there is? I open a page collection and immediately saw two microscopic foty. It is not clear whose it is, where. I think the first page to be content.Whose and how many collections there, even if they are invisible and people should know what they are and be able to ask to go on a trip! Next, think of the contents page of the collection. And then already foty and not so small, you want your watch without glasses.How to delete your photos from the collection if it is no longer relevant? Of course, if in conjunction with the gallery, then okay, but its something you can erase, change, etc. I enjoyed the download page.

14.09.2014 1:23, Shamil Murtazin:

re-ask the grouping with 32956 and 32957. Thank you.

13.09.2014 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa pulchrina / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 18:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here, bad everything is clear, we will wait Sergienko, and this is only next week.

13.09.2014 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eulia ministrana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

How come is it male?

13.09.2014 17:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eulia ministrana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 17:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eulia ministrana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 17:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomaspilis marginata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I'm just a normal tomorrow night companies will ......
So, most likely it's you, Alexander :)

13.09.2014 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would say,Lomaspilis marginata, hurry, come look closely. or you, Basil, you look not only to your phone, take a closer :)

13.09.2014 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomaspilis marginata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.09.2014 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema debile / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lomaspilis opisvisible?

13.09.2014 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why female?

13.09.2014 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.09.2014 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chiasmia clathrata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.09.2014 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chiasmia clathratathink. I will not tolerate. On the phone, and I can not check.

13.09.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also I Play around later. Fortunately material .........
I'll be home alone :)
I understand from your phone: reshoot is not necessary and you can use the photos that are on the site?

13.09.2014 7:47, Shamil Murtazin:

Great news! I will be testing closer to October. While there is no right materials at hand :)

13.09.2014 5:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Demon arrived yesterday night to catch and then got drunk in the trash (((That could not see me .....
Alexander, thank you for the nice, kind words))) I try .....
Unfortunately: now I'm back to work tomorrow, after it I want to call on Congress molbiola. So do not know if today and tomorrow still present on the site (((. Thank you))))

13.09.2014 5:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sad Butterfly ((. The emergence of these large and beautiful moths in my edges a sure sign of autumn came .....
Then there are CorydalisPtilophora plumigera, mothErannis defoliaria,Larerannis orthogrammaria,Operophtera brumataandOperophtera fagata, but this has got to first.
The season is over, and ahead of a long winter (((Sad ........

13.09.2014 4:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eau not karma. With this kind of a case. So is the case with Saturn S. pyri and S. pavonia. I have now left dozens of pupae Pavonia 2013. Last winter, part of the left and some remained, I think in the second year. So that :)

13.09.2014 3:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I hope that the task of editing positions than the year postponed. After all, you can quickly. This is evidenced operaivnost the task of finding the right photos in LC)

13.09.2014 0:43, Peter Khramov:

For addtional focus on the possibilities to remove the banner for all users zaregalsya now it hung the corresponding button. If you are logged in using your login - just click on the close button, and the banner will not be displayed longer (in LC for this climb is now optional).If you do not zaregalsya either not logged in ACC - register / log (function works only for zaregalsya users). Well, if you wanted to back him admire - to restore the banner display is always possible in the Dashboard.

12.09.2014 23:51, Peter Khramov:

After all the revisions, and test section launched for public use.
Online program for conducting collection allows you to organize information about instances in the collection of butterflies, bind them to the data (classification, images, and so forth.) Online, browse collections of other users, and share with them (if desired) information about your collector's item. In addition - to facilitate the exchange and sale of copies between the curator of insects.Common sense: you upload information about instances on the website is automatically attached to the copies of the forms in the catalog site, and consequently, photos, comments and stuff like that. You can publish information about the possibility of sharing and / or selling some of the instances.You can view the data on the copies from the collections of other users (if they set appropriate access settings). You can view information about the resolve of its copies - all visitors, only registered users can - only to those who know the password. And you can not allow anyone.And all this for each instance separately.
The points:
- Download copies to the site at a time through a web form. It can be accompanied by pictures for him. You can not.- Download copies on their website through a CSV / XLS file (created in Excel-like editors, and even in a notebook, exported from other programs to maintain collectionsif they have the ability to export data)
- Upload photos of packs for instance through the zip-file or one
- Automatic binding instance to a form on the website (do not need a fence system taxa)
- Placing a up to 23 properties for each instance
- Restriction of access to information about your copies (4 mode)
- Possibility of issuing copies to the exchange and / or sale
- View data about instances of other users (if they are set up appropriate permissions)
- The selection of items available on the grounds. As prizankam instances (e.g., state), and the species to which they belong.I draw your attention that the default is assigned to all instances of a free access mode (for information on them can see everything). If you want to use a different mode - put option meets both when loading data into a web form or in the CSV-file.We strongly recommend to assign a number or some other unique identifier instances in your collection. Otherwise, you yourself will be difficult to compare a copy with him on the site in the same collection.

Prog is now much, but not all.
In the near future, adding:
- Editing all data (includinglast entered) of the copies
- Binding copies of the points on the map
- Ability to comment on the items, broadcast of these comments in the section "Sooschestvo."

I usually new sections immediately spread that the thread of their own, but I do not supervise any collection.So do not be surprised if the first time a section is empty (until someone loads on their copies of the Old regime dosutpa in which it will be able to see other users). That is, if the site will be thousands of copies, but no public access, the outside section will look empty.Links to download data - in Dashboard . Link to browsing and selection of information - from the top menu of each page.

In this topic welcome any comments on the subject, in particular, comments on bugs and suggestions for further development.

12.09.2014 20:00, Peter Khramov:

No any "may's". Vasily, this is karma.

12.09.2014 19:52, Peter Khramov:

So we'll do.

12.09.2014 19:31, Peter Khramov:

For a complete happiness now the authors of photos on a page image below the image there is a button "Edit data of the photo." Click on it - just get in the edit section to search by number for this image. In many cases, so edit Fautua will be even easier than to look at a number manually.Adding a number of other photons from the same individual are now also going through this button.
ZY Basil, the complexity that is not only the first of these problems, but a few. A dozen: -) But editing - one of the closest to implement / priority.

12.09.2014 18:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sadly nothing here so far ( Either pupa got to overwinter (this species could do) or just passed away.... ( Dunno. I'll put it later on the bottom shelf of the fridge..... May it happen....

12.09.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, thanks :)

12.09.2014 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That was a change in the keyboard layout: Punto Switcher seems to be guilty :) Alexandr, thanks, I'll correct it in a sec :)

12.09.2014 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

The collector's surname seems misnoted: leg. V. I. Feoktistov :))

12.09.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Peter. Now remains the first task. For how long? And what is the difficulty?

12.09.2014 17:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Petr, as for pics I offered above.
As for the very algorithm, ready to chat about that in details after the recognition engine is defined.
The subject gonna be interesting. So you do integrate that and we'll get it better aftertime ;)

12.09.2014 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Male pupa" would sound more natural though the comma autosuggestion messed it up (

12.09.2014 17:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I'm sorry, did not see your post, indeed, the discus, it is desirable to withdraw from the photo.

12.09.2014 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Peter, I agree with you and Basil, on the place of writing, indicate in geography, but the language should be one. This is not a label for insects, where to save space is shrinking. but I'm always at the entire label write in the same language: Sobre Zhakov A; A. Opred.Zhakov or leg. Zhakov A .; det. Zhakov A.This label, on the site, which come not only entomologists, should be very clear to all :)))

12.09.2014 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I saw it so (the author's comment): http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31098 (where the series).
The fields for a photo in my opinion should be written during breeding and breeding geography. Other details in the author's comments.
And let's stop this. theme. Worthless good photo to accompany the discussion kilometer ......

12.09.2014 17:07, Peter Khramov:

And what response do not see the demon?

12.09.2014 16:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This appearance, typical of a certain type ....... just so short :)

12.09.2014 16:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Ps. В Neozephyrus brillantinus, reidentified E. A. Belyayev, Institute of Biology and Soil Science, FEB RAS.

12.09.2014 16:17, Peter Khramov:

Habit - he is, yes ...

12.09.2014 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not xyleutes, belonging to borers, and the genus Corydalis Tarsolepis: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/29518 :)
We must look after species which are for Vietnam. By habit they are most similar to each other ....

12.09.2014 16:03, Peter Khramov:

It is not the language in which to write. You can at any. The fact is emphasized that the subject is not geography relates to fishing location and relates to the removal site.

12.09.2014 15:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Butterfly not yet hatched?

12.09.2014 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

"ex ovo", "ex larva" and "ex pupa" - Vasily Try these three terms are translated by Google. and see what happens: as the Latin and Anglo. text. :) The question is not which language is written, and why give the abbreviated label inscriptions in a foreign language when you can completely write in Russian, it was clear to everyone?. :))

12.09.2014 14:19, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio nephelus ???

12.09.2014 14:16, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium xenocles ???

12.09.2014 14:08, Alex Dumchus:

Drawing on the rear cr. different from Junonia hierta

12.09.2014 14:03, Alex Dumchus:

Actias selene ???

12.09.2014 13:55, Alex Dumchus:

Xyleutes sp

12.09.2014 13:40, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, in such cases, a request to ship 3 separate photos. The site makes no sense to combine them into a single file. Unlike the book.

12.09.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you Anna :) Next time prisoedinyayes :)

12.09.2014 9:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So because of the geography. Was it were my native land, was, would without question :)

12.09.2014 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, you're surprising me: ex. pupa is not English but Latin :)
Here's an example with ex. ovo but the main point is clear:
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omne_vivum_ex_ovo
That's it, going off so far....

12.09.2014 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adding and stop: labels are commonly filled like Leg. and Det. together with a name in Russian :) Here's the same :)

12.09.2014 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I do not touch them, especially :)
Just this, no one will see how certain exactly my :)
Cold Nuclear Transmutation, no one saw ....
In short: this had to endure: :) ​​so grated eyes at me see :)

12.09.2014 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

flavipalpana kind of palps, but habit ...... In short, again in my genital mystery .... It was already a similar case.

12.09.2014 9:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I filled labels like that, usually :) Alexandr, I'm very tired today, can't work good with the website. Going to add one more specimen later and have a rest. Please sorry :)

12.09.2014 7:24, Anna Gerasimova:

: DD Well done!

12.09.2014 2:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Chet looked at their posts, and it turns out that once again butting with Basil. Basil is because you work the most, more than anyone else define, a lot of pictures and a lot of posts. :))) So among this mass and pop neponyatki mistakes and I'm trying to breed that site was all well and smoothly (certainly in my mind :))).In no case do not want to offend you or to find fault, the bulk of your work deserves great uvazhuha. :)))

12.09.2014 2:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, then why you use "ex. pupa" instead of Russian word which would be clearer to Russian-speaking users. Let English stays in the English version of the website :)

12.09.2014 1:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily hurried, something srastetsya, can not seem to reach the Celypha lacunana, butterfly itself and there is no other brilliant struychitosti, palps short. While I do not understand it :(

12.09.2014 1:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

12.09.2014 1:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

12.09.2014 1:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

12.09.2014 0:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Excellent work out. :))

12.09.2014 0:24, Irina Nikulina:

Understood) And on the first point - did not have to learn, everything is extremely simple, Chandata bella was not illustrated, on him and tried

12.09.2014 0:20, Peter Khramov:

Yes everything is alright. Many names have all sorts of different options. Who both NRA.

12.09.2014 0:17, Irina Nikulina:

That's just great !! Thank you. A lot of time was spent on a quest here have already mentioned.

12.09.2014 0:17, Peter Khramov:

He replied in a letter.

12.09.2014 0:13, Peter Khramov:

Search is ready. Now the editing section loaded on truck can enter the number of the picture and print it only, not the entire tape for editing photos.

12.09.2014 0:12, Irina Nikulina:

Peter knew about the first, thank you) I will learn a couple of days. But I try to remember about the second agreed ... ..? It is necessary to clarify what is meant.

11.09.2014 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Start slowly distribution of elephants. Irina Nikulina gets right to the appointment of illustrations for kinds of essays, as well as to the opening / closing of the debate (fotam room comments to the appropriate section of the Community).

11.09.2014 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, as for kidding, I meant you could appreciate benefit of this quite a tool used together with others on the website which is not some magic medicine. No one says it's possible to ID species with only wingspan info but it's real to reduce selection of species 10 times less (sometimes even more). Same with IDs by pic.

11.09.2014 23:38, Irina Nikulina:

In Sinev have Epatolmis caesarea given synonym luctifera [Denis et Schiffermuller], 1775 (nomen nudum)

11.09.2014 23:21, Peter Khramov:

In Seneve is a direct indication that Epatolmis caesarea - is synonymous Phragmatobia luctifera? In our system, they for a moment even different subfamily.

11.09.2014 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

11.09.2014 22:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, well, please do not touch Plusia, you do not see them.

11.09.2014 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, on species that have and do not close or anything similar, cautious, and genital types are defined and tolerated. :)))

11.09.2014 22:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anania hortulata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.09.2014 22:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Roger, Peter, about the Old, it is necessary for all, but did not understand why the years in September, suggesting that wintering butterfly? then dozens of options. :)

11.09.2014 22:04, Peter Khramov:

I think Basil simply meant that it would be good that was infa for this species, at what stage it hibernates.

11.09.2014 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, what kind of information should be added and what kind of source is it?
If a butterfly wintering stage, it is not correct and unfounded. In the literature, butterflies years from April to October, so it is itself caught in these months. but it does not say that the butterfly hibernates. :)

11.09.2014 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Duc I "on paper" fixed :) For discussion: do not think anyone is against not :)

11.09.2014 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.09.2014 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

11.09.2014 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha glycerion / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.09.2014 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.09.2014 17:50, Irina Nikulina:

Coenonympha glycerion

11.09.2014 17:49, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes sylvanus, male

11.09.2014 17:48, Irina Nikulina:

Plebejus argus

11.09.2014 17:48, Irina Nikulina:

Plebejus argus

11.09.2014 16:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. But still somehow absurdly out ... Okay, I went where you say: have no time :)

11.09.2014 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I did "joker" is difficult to understand me .... :) Well, well good luck in this endeavor. And as collector materials provided :)

11.09.2014 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Yes, we like it already discussed at the meeting. I have all recorded.

11.09.2014 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Upon registration, everyone is free to include your name in Roman letters as it sees fit. From there, and legs.

11.09.2014 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you're serious or pretending? That I can not believe, seriously ...

11.09.2014 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

According to the version from England :) Peter, you look like written two Basil: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/30040
We have the same namesake :) Where feet grow something?

11.09.2014 14:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes it is, I mean, she recognizes it :) Especially if the pictures of nature, or lёtany copies. ? In my opinion, really better to do, well, something like a gallery, or what? With such napodobii pictures here or where indicated by 99.9% right here are the differences here. Compare has eyes that still do not belong to the car :)

11.09.2014 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the final bend - per-pixel comparison of the floor, of course, not exactly. But not the essence. Basil, a utopia - what? 100% true definition of a butterfly on the image on the machine for a second? Yes, a utopia. And?

11.09.2014 14:31, Andrei Komrakov:

Yeah, see, thank you ..)

11.09.2014 14:07, Alexander Belousov:

Here I am about the same. In the call. let's worth, and then takes place. Especially if there are better from there. Kraasivaya gallery - pleases the eye!

11.09.2014 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Re-read. Fresh view: Utopia (
For example: how to reliably distinguish this program, the two generally similar form:
Pheosia tremulaandPheosia gnoma?
Especially today made a picture and places in which they distinguish between my eyes marked with red crosses:

11.09.2014 11:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Delete :) Here, I ask not for the first day: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2921 (

11.09.2014 11:45, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Just do not Thersites, he did not spot near the front of the wing root.

11.09.2014 11:43, Alexander Belousov:

Yes, I agree, if the copies. - The only one! And if you get better?

11.09.2014 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is understood that if the very disgusting picture as a technical rather than what is shown on it. It makes sense.

11.09.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate. Corrections are welcome.
It is necessary to move the business off the ground :)

11.09.2014 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xyleutes adusta / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.09.2014 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xyleutes adusta / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.09.2014 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I recommend to put on the agenda of the following 2 questions (overdue)
1) Editing your comments by users during a certain time (at least 1 hour. in LC), or until such time as the post will not answer (it's forumnye so in dreams). Just there are times when there is a need to post something to add.Accordingly, it is necessary that at the end of the post is automatically set the time when it was edited. There is nothing criminal in it do not see, so it is accepted everywhere and it is not know-how.
Now you have to start a new post, and as you can see: how much overgrown site-nothing "holivar" from one person. 2) Enter your search to the numbers in the pictures where LK something needs to be corrected in the editable fields.
From my own experience: is quite difficult to find the right picture when I got at the moment is already more than a thousand photos and 64 pages, respectively, in the LC.
Attended to, please.

11.09.2014 10:55, Alexander Belousov:

So much sense in principle to such a change is not! Change fuzzy photos shabby swallowtail on a photo of the same Shabby Man swallowtail but more dramatic? I suggested replacing the image with a worn copy. pictured naprimer- EX PUPA.

11.09.2014 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ind., Meeting in mid-September. This suggests that the species hibernating stage-imago. An example of when you need to add information indicating the source, so it does not seem unfounded :)

11.09.2014 8:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah :)

11.09.2014 8:39, Alexander Belousov:

By replacing the images my understanding is - you can change only the worst image of a specimen. photo on his own, but much better. And to place a replacement under the ID of the previous picture. ("That would not violate the reporting" (cat Matroskin))
I have transcribed properly?

11.09.2014 8:35, Alexander Belousov:

There are in fact finished the program, he used it long -davno called something like - antiduplikator. The comparison is the location of the image pixels and the search for identical or very similar. When you are betrayed the Old about the size, format, compression, both the pictures and immediately offered to remove the worst option. I chased her through the various cliparts.

11.09.2014 7:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.09.2014 7:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.09.2014 7:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.09.2014 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is clearly seen "brush" on the abdomen.

11.09.2014 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.09.2014 7:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes I know it is :) Just write that you can change the picture of one copy of the best photos of the same, and only the instance name :)

11.09.2014 2:36, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I created this theme not because people do not understand the algorithm, and need step by step instructions. And because they do not understand that, and what can be replaced, and that on that - you can not. And to remove about the same.

11.09.2014 2:35, Peter Khramov:

First, look at how it can work on algorithms to identify similar images, because it will be possible to draw conclusions about the future development.

11.09.2014 2:33, Peter Khramov:

Shamil worth. Anyway, the start -)

11.09.2014 2:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, in such cases there daw inaccurate, itself implying that confirm / refute welcome. I endured it because I do not see other options.

11.09.2014 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, so it is necessary to publish the rules and step by step instructions (this is for those to whom much is changing and requires constant this function) :)

11.09.2014 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

An example of variability.
It has obvious differences from the previously loaded: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29220
Especially need to pay attention to the lower wings.

10.09.2014 23:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, something is in any way. Sometimes it seems that she died, but look in the other. Hanging place.

10.09.2014 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhopobota naevana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2014 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhopobota naevana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2014 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It. Of the four species in only 8 it fits.

10.09.2014 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhopobota naevana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2014 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhopobota naevana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2014 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, a point: http://britishlepidoptera.weebly.com/223-rhopobota-naevana-holly-tortrix.html

10.09.2014 23:15, Irina Nikulina:

Rhopobota naevana?

10.09.2014 23:13, Irina Nikulina:

Rhopobota naevana?

10.09.2014 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Definition Fedor trust and, therefore, put into precise. There are few specialists on cabbage rolls, alas. But if it is possible to always move.

10.09.2014 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With yet another new kind :)
That's one tough nut to crack, even to the subspecies gnawed. Thank you good people, prompt where to dig :)

10.09.2014 22:40, Andrei Komrakov:

Instead P.thersites? Spot P3 above the P2-P4?

10.09.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota clara / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota clara / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota clara / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota clara / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 22:22, Irina Nikulina:

No, I think that this is not it. If it is difficult, and no assurance can be, just wait until the others cost. Opinions or confirmation before moving?

10.09.2014 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate: onii difficult for me and required more opinions. Although the option is also not in principle ....

10.09.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 22:00, Peter Khramov:

Participation may be. The fact that not all people have to replace a lot at once. And for the sake of the two photons is easier to make, to forward to someone than each time to explain what is good and what is bad, it can be replaced, and what is not.

10.09.2014 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to me that itLacanobia contiguapretty lёtannaya?

10.09.2014 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Male / Fyodor Pudovikov.

10.09.2014 21:05, Fyodor Pudovikov:

P. icarus this, P. bellargus just edging is not as thin, and the color is blue.

10.09.2014 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena tityrus / Confidently identified / Male / Shamil Murtazin.

10.09.2014 21:03, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

10.09.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, just saw your eyes in the morning half :)

10.09.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gypsonoma dealbana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2014 20:32, Irina Nikulina:

Gypsonoma dealbana(photo in the group)

10.09.2014 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, here we are talking about replacing the self-image of their users themselves in their LC.
Your participation is not required here.
This system is the first time I had run-if memory serves in February of this year, "the hard way" :)

10.09.2014 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, not the name brought. Of course, as here sheAnania hortulata:) While I can not stand because of the geography.

10.09.2014 19:56, Shamil Murtazin:

the floor seem nabrehal))

10.09.2014 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eurrhypara hortulata ?

10.09.2014 19:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri like a butterfly? ..

10.09.2014 19:53, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena tityrus, female

10.09.2014 19:51, Shamil Murtazin:

without regard to geography likePlebejus idas

10.09.2014 19:46, Shamil Murtazin:

I do not know about Kazakhstan ...
a fine fringe on top of the wing likePolyommatus bellargus, Samchyky

10.09.2014 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK I just put the phone on the shelf finally :)

10.09.2014 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia trabealis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

10.09.2014 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

10.09.2014 19:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

10.09.2014 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula decorata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 19:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil I on the phone :))) but not something like, I do not remember the exact transferred into.

10.09.2014 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The beautyScopula decorataafraid in the exact place and should be confirmed.

10.09.2014 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not ventured into accurate because of geography)))) Correct you can always :)

10.09.2014 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lythria purpuraria / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acontia trabealis? I can not stand is due to the region. Confirmation Required.

10.09.2014 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acotia trabealis ?

10.09.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio machaon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More like one is not found. Flight 8 from June to August

10.09.2014 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.09.2014 18:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter was planned :) That's all. It should be a flood? ..))
Basil, I speak do not remember exactly. Do not hit much =)

10.09.2014 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis betuletana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2014 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis betuletana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2014 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She does not see the options.

10.09.2014 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

10.09.2014 18:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter!
First and foremost, the question arises, what are we, the neural network will build and teach her? Probably not.
Then, I think, the most important features of any mark which must be determined. If the configuration of the wings, venation (by the way, for the program may be easier to explain it than a man) and the pattern of the wing.I was just out of ignorance of the algorithm on which it's planned.
By type of - I do not see much of a difference that it is to define.
As a rule acted very much the same ph no shipping - more than three copies straightened in a form not found. This wayCatocala nupta, but there are other similar species.I have one unfolding, even a photo section for the collection did. I can download if necessary.
I suggestSaturnia pavonia: a well distinguished by color pattern, is "something which" unbundling geography.

10.09.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

10.09.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

10.09.2014 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She slumber just eats :)

10.09.2014 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena capsincola / Confidently identified / .

10.09.2014 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil subspecies has not been canceled and will not revoke: because it is a subspecies :)))). By the way, where the wind blew? Ssylochku-to :)
It was in one place and forms of the aberrations: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/28816 and it started me :)

10.09.2014 17:24, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, it was not about the subspecies, but about form / race. Blog - make do, only I think, is it worth it now so separated from the other sections. What, for example, will be different from the Category Blog section Kurilka about butterflies?

10.09.2014 17:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, here on "modeling" has been mention of the abolition of the use of taxonomic subspecies. Maybe something I do not understand. Probably, the relevance of this feature in the future will be significant.

Peter! Ready to blog "news from the fields in the lap of removing altsinoev in adverse environments, temporary stay of places."I am waiting until the weekend, after a start to flood in some posts on the forum.

10.09.2014 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anarta trifolii / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

10.09.2014 17:10, Shamil Murtazin:

I'm going to let a substitute pictures. It gives us something sgozhus.
then the delivery channel of pictures I probably will e-mail.
Well, the replacement request form also develop (XLI-XLI, byurokaratiya ... =)

10.09.2014 15:08, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Anarta trifolii (Hufnagel, 1766)

10.09.2014 14:40, Peter Khramov:

If the website content can't be used, no sense to try :--) it's not about the number of species. Alexandr, you think bookish, if there's no data enough then we get a limited selection of species (based on location or taxon or whatever else) which is not necessary here. Think wider, guys! The software should learn to determine the coefficient of the likeness between specimens in different pics (first in similar angle shots). Lots of many things could be got of this sole thing!
1. The software will be determine likeness between images on the website. The more images we got, the better the result.
2. The software will show specimens most alike or different. Or any other else after it calculates all the coefficients.
3. Results will be joined to catalogue selections. E.g., we add a pic and note that was Nymphalidae shot in Spain in July. No need to limit yourselves with only one feature.
That will be awesome. But only if coefficients will be calculated more or less adequately for which we need this very first set of images.
Once again: guys, there are really few limits if the website's well-organized (as against books). "Recognition identifier" doesn't mean at all it admits pics only and doesn't handle any other additional info.

10.09.2014 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not believe in magic wands, but a fantasy come true :) I think there may be a very minimal robot (in number of species). But dashing the trouble started. From the materials of the site that does not happen. I suggest to try with images from the disc on the day of Eastern Europe.

10.09.2014 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While in the head did not come: tired scary. To think in this case it is necessary later. This is me on my own :)

10.09.2014 13:45, Peter Khramov:

Thank you for your feedback. Again. Need a one kind of plus a few varying degrees of similarity to it. All - top view (hello copper-butterfly, yeah). For a start, good to have all been on a homogeneous background. Correction - is unimportant.

10.09.2014 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

NB: to distinguish N. xanthomelas and N. polychloros there is a sign "color leg", but it does not work if the butterfly shot from above (as well as most of the photographers and prefers to shoot).
Continuation of the list should be ......

10.09.2014 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let me start by our obvious:
Nymphalis xanthomelasvsNymphalis polychloros(Nymphalidae)
Catocala sponsavsCatocala promissa(Erebidae)
Pheosia tremulavsPheosia gnoma(Notodontidae)
Clostera curtulavsClostera anachoreta(Notodontidae)
This is just an example of the first 4 "without thinking" I do not know is whether the transfer-on .....

10.09.2014 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The idea is necessary. Once I started like: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=507513
By the way, there you can inspire us some information.
Later, be sure to add: in my head already a heap namёtok only once before all hands are not getting through.

10.09.2014 10:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gypsonoma dealbana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.09.2014 10:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

10.09.2014 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

dealbana of habit. I stand.

10.09.2014 10:50, Andrei Komrakov:

Hadena capsincola (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)?

10.09.2014 10:49, Andrei Komrakov:

Hadena capsincola (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)?

10.09.2014 7:55, Alexander Belousov:

It is a good and necessary idea, support! I think we must start with the blues! And how to be a test photo - someone on a white disclaims battened up wings and powerful shadow below. Some chose a neutral gray background, I prefer black. Nodo prog will point to it not to "distracted".Probably will need the correct scheme (or preferred) raspravki for different types. Furthermore, how to be with the wrong color correction? But in any case, for many people, like me - lovers, the program will find at least the way in which to look further!

10.09.2014 0:51, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, of course, I'm sorry, have all the same napisala- Kaluga region

10.09.2014 0:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Ps. Copied # 32834: Xanthia togata and opened in Photoshop. The file is saved in the color space RGB.
Ie no CMYK there.

10.09.2014 0:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Geography is?

10.09.2014 0:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Vladimir! This color space (CMYK) can appear only in one case. If you worked there, and saved the file, not coming out of this space.

09.09.2014 23:11, Irina Nikulina:

Apotomis sauciana?

09.09.2014 23:02, Irina Nikulina:

Apotomis betuletana?

09.09.2014 23:01, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Gypsonoma dealbana? or sociana?

09.09.2014 22:54, Peter Khramov:

First timid steps for fly to the moon.
So the first phase starts with spread specimens and, say, upperside angle shots. The recognition identifier should compare different shots of lepidoptera and ascertain quite well (more or less) if specimens are alike and how much.
For the beginning a set of photos needed to train this software and check its efficiency.
E.g., let's take a species and a few pics of spread specimens upperside view. Then take a couple of species alike and some corresponding images. Then less alike. And absolutely different. In the end we get a dozen or two of various images, different and alike. Then we can start training the software.
Sure there are some species completely identic in appearance, or subspecies which are more different from nominative species than totally different species, and so on. Obviously no magic here. Anyway, this is at least worth trying.
Any thoughts on that, what species to take for a start and pics of which species, different and alike, to use?

09.09.2014 21:35, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Re: Looked # 32834 - where the color space CMYK.
Do not understand. Where there is CMYK? If I keep this image at home and open in Photoshop, it shows the RGB.

09.09.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not delete. It was a double best picture and I changed it. The point is that when the goods have not yet had the opportunity to replace :)

09.09.2014 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I'm for you begun to flag, I consider it necessary to remove from the gallery. I do not think that these photos still need site. Not to worry: the excess is not marked :)

09.09.2014 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something forgotten this topic, but nevertheless it is always relevant ......
The other day, I recommend a good resource on Aganainae: www.aganainae.nl/
I think it should be added to the sources and likely'll do it tomorrow.

09.09.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

del.

09.09.2014 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, a small question. You are in the background that you use? For a long time I want to go to a black background, but I can not find the optimal solution. A plan to replace, complete and ahead of winter, when there is time to do it.

09.09.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, there is no need for consultation of the technique, and the sense of replacement. No man has not yet understood what foty can be changed, and what does not (the first time). And judging by your text, I see that, probably, you also do not fully understand the true: -) Throw off my mobile phones number in the mail, I'll Dial. Or do call the number from Contacts.

09.09.2014 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.09.2014 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Rubbish poudalyal. With regard to the uniformity of writing subspecies: the very fact that it is written in a separate line in the free form has a defect site. Will do option to foty can be fastened to the same subspecies, not only to species. This is the future. And now everyone can write as it sees fit.Just do not forget that this field to clarify the classification and not the stage of development and other explanatory notes (which have their own fields).

09.09.2014 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We must first contact with Peter and get the opportunity. By default, it is not none.

09.09.2014 12:57, Alexander Belousov:

He threw two new pictures of male disdory, but never found the treasured button where there is a replacement. Now, four of them!

09.09.2014 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing to remove or not. Just boot the new photo of the same butterflies and they replaced the old. Everything is done by machine: with a new photo must specify the number of which is necessary to replace and update the data. Regarding the removal of alien images it is necessary to notify the author and give him an opportunity to express their opinion and possibly correct the situation.Sly is impossible to do in any case for moral reasons primarily. Even if the photo utterly disgusting.

09.09.2014 10:11, Alexander Belousov:

.

09.09.2014 9:59, Boris Loboda:

>>> And what is the question? Translate to RGB
? It's me or something. I just explained the situation, why the pictures are pale. Why did you decide that I have the wrong picture on something there to translate.

09.09.2014 9:25, Yuri Semejkin:

And what is the question? Translate to RGB

09.09.2014 8:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phengaris arion / Shamil Murtazin Plebejus argus / Eugene Karolinskiy.

09.09.2014 8:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phengaris arion / Shamil Murtazin Plebejus argus / Eugene Karolinskiy.

09.09.2014 8:25, Boris Loboda:

Looked # 32834 - where the color space CMYK.

09.09.2014 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As a postscript: I understand of course that can be useful to determine the type, for example, in the field (where the Internet is not always and not at all). But why in such quantities. I think that they have already played a role in determining a particular butterfly and should remove excess, leaving one photo. Of course, if Andrew will not mind :)

09.09.2014 7:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gentlemen, do you think these photos are needed and even more so in such numbers? Here is an example photo of the genitals: lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32916 What are want to see on the site. Or is it for the story? :)

09.09.2014 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.09.2014 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.09.2014 5:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.09.2014 1:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thymelicus sylvestris / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

09.09.2014 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

09.09.2014 0:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry for off-top, I'm still mainly Coleoptera man :)
Insects happen to change behaviour in new area.
Just an example. There was peaceful ordinary Leptinotarsa decimlineata Say. which fed on solanaceous and did no any harm. At the end of 19th century it spread over France and little by little all over and became famous dreadful potato pest. So far no effective measures found against this afaik.
There some other stories alike, can tell later, don't want to rely on my memory.

09.09.2014 0:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.09.2014 0:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

08.09.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter this question. We've added subspecies anyone? If not, you can take the matter to himself. Look, the point is dead on, or close to it (

08.09.2014 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I have long break in the case. And if you suddenly need any advice on replacement, except Peter, and can contact me :)

08.09.2014 23:35, Irina Nikulina:

This is real disaster(... Back then this "hungry dog" lived in Asia then was brought in from China to Germany in 2006, so the whole thing started... Year ago there was some special convention with this on the agenda, turns out the invasion still hasn't been stopped...

08.09.2014 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Ok, Alexander, I have to share the appropriate interface. But first it is necessary to have a little talk on the phone, and then, as experience shows, there is not all be obvious. When the change, and when not.

08.09.2014 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil large compared with the average copper-butterfly? Also from the phone (.....

08.09.2014 22:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

from the phone I can only confirm the doubts :)

08.09.2014 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, do not be upset at Saturnia, well, where the same doll can know that no one will take birth. Well, I did not wait for: just a coincidence :) guess human nature is not given.The main event was great :) I came home after midnight and got up at 4 am and drove for two days, to work and I was not a bit upset. So far under the impression, and damned glad :)

08.09.2014 21:49, Shamil Murtazin:

I ask to see the correct definition. thank! )

08.09.2014 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Well, Peter, well wrapped ... and smile ...))) especially liked the second paragraph)
Just come, so briefly to join the undisputed assertion that live better)) Thank you for the warm atmosphere and Peter - in advance - for the promised improvements to Friday) One upset - at home waiting for me sad Saturnia with a slightly rumpled,but still wonderfully beautiful wings that suddenly decides to leave it in the evening, not having warned in advance ... With dolls much easier) And as for the continuation of the tradition in an expanded format - I'm quite over!)
(Yes, Peter, I was not mistaken - truly printbook.ru)

08.09.2014 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Forced the process. Congrats with a new species, guys :)

08.09.2014 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.

08.09.2014 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.

08.09.2014 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.

08.09.2014 21:32, Lev Bely:

Irina, thanks, glad to see you too! Doesn't that nasty, just hungry as dog:)

08.09.2014 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota contorta / Confidently identified / Grigoriy Grigoriev.

08.09.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Announcement. The species is IDed. I'll add this day after tomorrow, not databased. And will move :)

08.09.2014 21:06, Irina Nikulina:

Lev, hello!! Good you did, so translation is coming which means collaboration renewed)) Yesterday Petr said that, good news) I've just come, didn't have time to read the new post of that nasty Cydalima, bit later.

08.09.2014 20:46, Lev Bely:

Sorry, pushed the wrong button.

08.09.2014 20:31, Lev Bely: This species is identified correctly.

08.09.2014 20:17, Lev Bely:

Vasily, thanks! As well glad to be back:)

08.09.2014 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, can't be Cydalima only :) Lots of moths and so with work: takes a lifetime :) Welcome back :)

08.09.2014 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have only 2 days with phone and I can not check. If anyone confirm-bear :)

08.09.2014 20:06, Lev Bely:

"The only matter today is Cydalima!" (c) :)

08.09.2014 20:04, Alex Lender:

Photo ispod not, did not, flew away, but underside seen almost sure aglaja, sling brownish stains on HCC has not been

08.09.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexei underside there hour? Although this probably can be determined foreshortening. Sam can not do it until the next day, I think, yes, Aglaia or Adippa, but rather the first one. It is necessary that somebody else checked.

08.09.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hello :)
Peter, well, what am I, a demon? In a normal heart, a good man: like all the people around. Only once did not see: there are no bad people, and there are just bad circumstances :)
I confess, late yesterday ...Let me down "Shaitan-Arba": Ilf and Petrov was named as the Central Asian Railway in the immortal "Golden Calf", but it applies fully still and Railways :) Our native, the Moscow Region elekrichka, moreover, that the late well, so more and I rode like a turtle ...
I am very glad this meeting: because I have waited for this :) Very well communicated ...And it should be, to continue this tradition, we do not vdvoems Peter and extended :) regrets to all those who, for whatever reason, did not participate. You lost a lot, gentlemen :(. In fact live chat is always better than communicating through a soulless machine, computer and internet.

08.09.2014 19:44, Alex Lender:

Argynnis aglaja?

08.09.2014 19:44, Alex Lender:

Thymelicus sylvestris?

08.09.2014 18:51, Alexander Belousov:

Just I want to change the old to the new! Now how it all crank if photos are not deleted or replaced.

08.09.2014 17:30, Peter Khramov:

Last night met with Shamil Murtazin Irina Nikulina and Vasily Feoktistov. Location - is almost traditional John Donne.
Me has managed to arrive 40 minutes ahead of time, and even the institution was almost soft on the occasion of Sunday - served almost alone cakes.Besides Basil he called and said that late, but Shamil Irina still in the preliminary phoned confessed that complication. Plus, I was already half a day if not on the pill.
I had to take a couple of burning alcohol-containing drinks that are still found in the menu, and booze in one, waiting to be tightened people.The situation is a little bit saved sports broadcasts (bookmaker is located three blocks from the John Donne, convenient).
By the time they reached Shamil Irina, I had four times the recharge lamp entofonare and even once to slip and fall chin on the table.But the cherry flavor became more tart, so the mood is gradually rising, but spirits remained.
While greeted with Shamil and Irina, and Vasili came in the yellow jersey.
Unfortunately, as soon as all gathered, there was talk about butterflies.I am the subject bear bad, but there is still impacted chemicals in the body, so I'm a little disconnected. I only remember from under the table to choose, and then vaguely. In general, the scene "under the table" I was much cheered, but then switched to the topic Vasily Zhukov, so I cut down again.A little later, they brought a large cake and Basil woke me up, as the discussion turned to the subject of the site. As a result of a long and sometimes very lively discussion, it became clear that our site is perfect and improve it something - only harm.As gritstsa from the good deed goes unpunished! So the decision was made general that no new sections and functionality on the site until 2018 will not be. With a possible extension to 2036. Voted unanimously.In addition, the Holy Inquisition sentenced to excommunication Lion "man and the steamer" White - for the long absence of new materials and translations online, Dmitry Pozhogin - for no show at the exhibition, Alexander Zhakova - for his lack of contact, Basil "Demon" Feoktistov for what it is not a good person and all,who was absent on the site more than a month in a row without a good reason (and what can there be a good reason). True, we could not unanimously, almost everyone except me, were against the excommunication as too brutal measures. Agreed until probation.Even Basil boasted its Meshchera trophies, Irina - Far impressions and photographic equipment, and Shamil - the rapid growth of knowledge during his time on the site. In general, we communicated very well, and in addition, that the meeting was pleasant, it was still useful.I was glad to see the Offline people with whom previously communicated only online / phone. Irina is a special thank you for the fairing: -)
Offer Shamil, Irina and Vasily supplement my memory lapses, and to share their impressions of the meeting; -)

08.09.2014 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Join. Haven't seen for long :)

08.09.2014 17:00, Peter Khramov:

Welcome back, prodigal son.

08.09.2014 15:15, Lev Bely:



The unique Yew-and-Boxwood Tree Grove in Sochi, Russia, is having a bad time as nearly all local boxwood trees (Buxus colchica) were destroyed by Cydalima perspectalis larvae which feed on boxwood tree leaves. The moth was supposedly brought in amidst some Italian plants imported for landscape works to decorate the area of the 2014 Winter Sochi Olympics. They tried to liquidate pest once it was spotted but it hardly got any result.

Experts say now about 70% of boxwood trees are totally destroyed by the moth invasion. The thing is getting worse due to that C. perspectalis has overspread along the whole Black Sea coastline. Moreover, there are no natural enemies that could restrain pest population to some extent.

It's reported that a new insecticide is currently being developed. The nature reserve authorities sent a request to the Ministry of Nature asking for a permit to use special insecticides banned in other nature reserves in order to save the rest of boxwood trees.



Kavkazsky Uzel, http://www.kavkaz-uzel.ru
Photo: C. perspectalis, Heiner Ziegler, http://www.euroleps.ch

08.09.2014 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

08.09.2014 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one goes to tentatively identified based on another collected day ago which was as well questionable with such angle even less worn-out :)
Alexandr's right, no chance to get clear ID here.

08.09.2014 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Photos are not grouped and moved according to the author's remark.

08.09.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

08.09.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

08.09.2014 14:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

08.09.2014 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.09.2014 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Staurophora celsia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.09.2014 19:45, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

07.09.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could be this. However, I see it as miniata male. I upped this a week ago without moving. Yesterday I did where thought reasonable. Miniata can be pale as well. If I was wrong, please move where you think it should be. Would be great though to get some reaction to my 19:18 27/08/2014 request. No offense :)

07.09.2014 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, why this moth was IDed as Miltochrista miniata and confidently? I'd agree if it's from Moscow region, there are 4 species in Far East and this one looks more of Miltochrista rosacea. I wouldn't suppose even tentatively identified without size info. And not ragged just pale as Miltochrista rosacea.

07.09.2014 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Didn't have time.... Seems got it for the first time here :)

07.09.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks. Moving to confidently identified :)

07.09.2014 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.09.2014 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.09.2014 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.09.2014 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Please don't, the spread specimen says it clear, Plusia festucae. No two versions here as the wing's flat and clearly seen and the thing's not worn-out. :)

07.09.2014 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, here's it. Just I accelerated the drying process :) Have no idea now... Anticipating puthami.

07.09.2014 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena tityrus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Lender.

07.09.2014 12:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is right :)

07.09.2014 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Already spread, I'll add when it's done :) Usually putnami goes to the light whilst this one looks kinda different. Or just some illusion, dunno. Will see when gets spread :)

07.09.2014 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I honestly do not remember what, and who recommended her to God :)
And to find out what exactly was used, it is necessary to look EXIF ​​file :)
And quality does not depend on the editor (editors are now popular all good), and from the editing.

07.09.2014 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Species yet not published. When it's done, then we'll catalogue and describe here. Concidering as it's usually arranged, could take half a year.

07.09.2014 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.09.2014 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is different family and species in Far East, this Incurvaria gender presented with oehlmanniella only. :)

07.09.2014 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, seems mistake, don't you move so far, bad angle as for the main feature, have to check secondary ones. Reckon would get clear with a spread one.

07.09.2014 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, what would Semeykin not read, it is recommended that you give him the photo editor ?, in addition to the quality of this picture butterflies still strongly nahimicheno the editor can not be killed by such copies. stand on a white background, all the flaws in the eyes climb.

07.09.2014 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sure :) No any removing.

07.09.2014 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Curious. Seems Lampronia though no any Prodoxidae in 40th region according to Synev...

07.09.2014 11:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Basically Alexandr says right. If possible I try to shot and add here specimens with features different from ones we've got here already. If the folks don't mind, let it stays here so far. Doesn't take long to remove.

07.09.2014 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here's male: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27329 which Irina IDed, no wings and abdomen seen though...
Meh..... would be great to spread it. Dreams, dreams........

07.09.2014 10:47, Irina Nikulina:

This is it. There is a nice couple on molbiol
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=180517&view=findpost&p=935350

07.09.2014 10:46, Peter Khramov:

Let me explain about the filtering until ph. Remember, was originally 100% pre-moderation, and then the ph was removed almost the same as published. And those that were published, at least a little, but still I have, if necessary (as was the need to very often) processed / retouched. Then he made a circuit with postmoderatsiey.Still, I'm pretty much on truck loaded deleted. Ho. Later, the question arose of points. Like, if foty others on the site already, and this is no better than, the Fota could still be useful for the point. But it slow down due to lack of online dvigla for affixing points and, respectively, tracking a point / no point.As a result, now online, and the truth is pretty much fotomusora. Fortunately, the situation from the point seems to be moved forward, and the maximum in September (and maybe even a few days), we still run it. Accordingly, it will be possible to remove foty more calmly.In addition, I would like to add a first mechanism to prevent the user of the impending removal, so that he could bring his case against the (not always all the advantages of the image may be obvious).
Summary: garbage is, how much will be deleted.

07.09.2014 10:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

I may be wrong, didn't check now but this species has gender dimorphism also in colour, males are yellow whilst females are pink, this is not a variation but a typical specimen. Yury seems to add intentionally pics with specific features different from ones in alive specimens for a more precise ID. I'm for keeping it here so far despite the specimen condition. Yet aesthetics part suffers a little. :)

07.09.2014 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gonna be my answer, beauty from Moscow region versus Far East...
No way: both species are in Far East :)
Moved it to tentatively identified, please confirm who can or disproof: got stuck in broad daylight :)
Later will spread this and upload pic.

07.09.2014 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So didn't get cleared, what's this dark male?

07.09.2014 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.09.2014 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.09.2014 5:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Meh, eyes betrayed again: didn't see the position is same :)

07.09.2014 5:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Forgot to add: pic should be with same position as it's here. Not of first importance imho.

07.09.2014 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, if the second pic shows clearly this yellow type with abdomen and hindwings, let's remove.
If not, please don't and wait for a better one. No hurry here, especially with this case.

07.09.2014 2:44, Peter Khramov:

Not a good pic, there's another from the same author, better angle, same location. To remove?

07.09.2014 0:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sparrow bird :)

06.09.2014 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Eh, to show this alive)) Enormous beauty) 14cm wingspan!

06.09.2014 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, location data description: Primorsky region, Vladivostok city, ex. pupa :)

06.09.2014 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Indeed :)

06.09.2014 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And she (as pictured) at least three of the double in the eighth region habit :) I just looked all. I do not risk it, I became with her, in short :)

06.09.2014 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wonderful. :)

06.09.2014 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I did not go. On the train I have not grown together. Just if you sit in a train in the 19:53 then you come to 21:28 , and they go there once an hour, and then to a point about two kilometers to go in the woods. In the dark, reluctant to bother: to set the screen, etc. We had previously nominated for an hour, and I missed the (
Nothing: I will go later :)

06.09.2014 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's right, I'm a specialist :) confirmed your statements that specify exactly knowing fauna (not a list of species and which species, when, where and in what quantity and what exactly live in the Kaluga region) is extremely difficult.

06.09.2014 23:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Good luck, Basil! =)

06.09.2014 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh, just I thought you butted me with this Dichrorampha . So wrong :) I'm sorry, just after yesterday's own nerves. I also have to take himself in hand. Worthless us swear not here and not there :)

06.09.2014 23:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Oh.... Eh.... Is this really Lacanobia thalassina? I've got it grey with yellowish lines...
(question mark lost)

06.09.2014 22:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, are you talking about? Are we then to understand each other can not, I tried to help you, explain please, where I love you "butted" :)

06.09.2014 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well can't stop bother :) Originally here was the remark in the classification field, "Probably orange variation of erate, hyale or sareptensis"
Not croceus, is it?
No courage to move it to not identified.....

06.09.2014 22:52, Alex Lender:

Lycaena tityrus?

06.09.2014 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Look at your leisure and then write here, to know. I think it is very important to ensure that the procedure with this case it was.

06.09.2014 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I'm on the memory, but it is written in the code, you just have to look for it, I have now do not have it handy.

06.09.2014 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, thank you, and you can credit you can ask for? Or the date?
Although I does not really matter as most forms and aberrations had called more with the king-peas.

06.09.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander again for his? Keep calm. Boda I still will not. Yeah?

06.09.2014 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

If I'm not mistaken, it's from the Code of Zoological Nomenclature, but not canceled, and from what the year is not recommended, give names below subspecies, ie, shape, aberration and others. Name By According to this year can be used.

06.09.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let the expert in microleps says his word :)
Here in 8th region we got 20 species of Dichrorampha, so I named most likely by appearance, further I surrender.

06.09.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In fact: according to some sources is now canceled aberration and form types and offers to do without them. In my opinion, in spite of this they must be all the same point.
How do you feel about that? And it is interesting actually, something to read, "where the shoe pinches" at this cancellation and the reasonably. Maybe something I do not understand?

06.09.2014 22:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeah, with no info of the regional fauna, pure guess-work.

06.09.2014 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here's the third form, Araschnia levana, f. porima. Andrey please add this to the classification field.

06.09.2014 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh... I seem to have already offered that back in July. Also corrected mine :)

06.09.2014 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'll edit this right now where I can. Should be arranged in one style :)

06.09.2014 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can be but the dark fringe is kinda confusing, also mouthparts and the central dark spot shape.

06.09.2014 21:47, Alex Lender:

Thanks. (Checked how other species pics are signed).

06.09.2014 21:40, Alex Lender:

Alexandr, no sadly. Supposed Choristoneura diversana.

06.09.2014 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's better, imho. Its classic form is a spring one, Araschnia levana f. levana.

06.09.2014 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Underside also vitally needed here :)

06.09.2014 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dichrorampha flavidorsana? most likely as I see, though can be as well alpinana, vancouverana, petiverella.....
In short, the choice is wide, can be also "genitalia" ID :(

06.09.2014 21:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Any angles more? Got lost between few species with this pic. :)

06.09.2014 21:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

06.09.2014 21:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plodia interpunctella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2014 21:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plusia putnami / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2014 20:44, Alex Lender:

Plusia festucae or putnami? Please help(

06.09.2014 20:41, Alex Lender:

Autographa gamma?

06.09.2014 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A counter-question. Alexander, and unless it is regulated where do I ship a photo to identify? This is purely my personal affair where I upload photos to identify. The quality of the butterfly is not vybirayut.Tem more if the first record and the species is represented by a minimum. Example, my photos: http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 33046 I wanted to do it will not put, but identified with the material on hand and still set so as the site was up to me just one photo. And there is hardly replenish, whether foreseen in the near future.
My answer to this question: "The latest example of Idiochlora ussuriaria.Irina says: Jodis lactearia, probably (I realize this is not a precise definition), Basil: It is, stand (this is the exact definition). And transferred to a well-defined. Kind determined not true (anything can happen, all wrong) is transferred correctly. "
We have some time to correct. Including itself.Basil Sergienko definition of moths I trust more than you, myself and Irene together.
And yet, Alexander: I do not kick you for what you do not have any photos butterfly straightened, and one photo in nature? I have the same picture straightened because I'm trying to gather first, and only then deal with it.Experiments with the pictures in my nature tsifromylnitsey little success: I'm not a photographer, and here I think is not a subsidiary of "Makrokluba." Yes, I (like everyone) have flaws in raspravke.In such cases, in my LC is a function of replacing the photo and I did occasionally use because all the material that I present here is straightened in my personal collection and do not fly away, escape, etc. And if you need something to remove I write that you want to delete. Well, perhaps everything: tired to write. In the words of Leopold the Cat: "Guys, let's live together" :)

06.09.2014 19:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.09.2014 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Peter, I fully agree with what you need to come to a consensus on a business topic, and not on the pages of the form.
Therefore, once again raise the question of the quality of service Related photo material put up on the site.
I get tired of the same struggle for the quality of the site and hear the person in the address assaults and insults.I always try to write correctly, can unpleasant, but on the subject matter. But I try not to get curses and insults, even in response to try not to be rude, and easy to figure out the position. I would like to know where I puts?
Just answer, according to Vasily Angerona prunaria and Charissa obscurata.First, Sergei put both Crocota tinctaria, view an image that is not on the site, and then it was redefined as Angerona prunaria, though you, Vasily and Sergei objected and brought two more photos, to clarify the definition.Indeed, butterfly poletanaya, but a form that caused much doubt in vidoopredelenii (has speciation characters - dark cross pattern), is a unique specimen. By Charissa obscurata all questions asked, only by unfolding the wing where the visible image. When you are better, then we will think about.I come back to the quality of the photos. The site great democracy, anyone that wants to, and that can even ship. Peter is very patient and removes only in exceptional cases where the marriage is clear, and what kind does not parse as. And there is not what art. .I do not understand why the spread is clearly low-quality material type that has already been submitted to other sites of higher quality photos, the site is chasing of photos?Especially sad to see when such photos (substandard) puts the moderator, I do not focus on the Photo Editor, which Vasily uses and recommends the use of another, there is a special case, maybe I do not understand something.But defective strongly poletanyh not perfectly straightened butterflies I think it is not necessary to spread (it is about the other kinds of photographs presented as an exception, and straightened in nature, but then raspravka be ideal).Peter, bring the desired criteria photos that we all know that it is desirable to expose, and what kind of example to give users of the website. And it turns Basil, plead for a site exposes the photos of the most, I advocating for the site on a bump for the quality of these photos.If you as the administrator of such consumer goods completely satisfied, I will then I will not raise this issue, and I will think for themselves whether to work with the material of such quality.
Please Raise the issue at the meeting, can I the only one, I would want that the photos were high-quality.And another question, about an unspecified material, I do not understand why some butterflies, Basil, you upload to determine on mobiole, and others that are not defined directly on the site loads?
And, Peter, you need to discuss the priority determination and responsibility (moral ) of the definition. The latest example of Idiochlora ussuriaria.Irina says: Jodis lactearia, probably (I realize this is not a precise definition), Basil: It is, stand (this is the exact definition). And transferred to a well-defined. Kind determined not true (anything can happen, all wrong) is transferred correctly.You once explained that the author of the definition, the one who gave only one correct name, even if the sign? "Likely", "may", "might", "instead of ...", etc. If two or more names, the author of the definition of those who chose one. But we have two levels of definition of "accurate" and "inaccurate" and then there are the options: 1).one determined accurately. 2) a determined inaccurately, the second confirmed accurately. 3). one to determine exactly the other hesitated inaccurate. 4). Option wrong. Who is easy to implement 1 and 4 versions for 2 and 3 only in the comments.If it is technically possible to introduce the column "confirmed the definition of" (only if the original is not exactly the first and only confirmed), and doubts about the correct definition of a precise definition, respectively.
I apologize for large text, I want no hard feelings and usefully.

06.09.2014 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, while I'm going to catch the light again in Meshchora but to another point (try on a bog shine).
I hope the trip will be successful this time :) As well as meeting tomorrow.

06.09.2014 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As well as the reasons for taking yanye :)

06.09.2014 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Threesomes with Basil and Shamil met, probably tomorrow. If someone suddenly - Dont heziteyt that.

06.09.2014 17:16, Peter Khramov:

Henceforth all are putting in person or (maximum) in the system area. Quiet as the elephant (at least in public) - the basic quality Modera / admin.

06.09.2014 17:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To Alexandr Belousov: may I remind that the classification specification field is used for subspecies data, also form and age. E.g., "light form" or "third age larva".
Person who identified specimen should be noted in the field for additional info. E.g., "specimen raised of larva" or "identified by pic" or any other additional data.

06.09.2014 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.09.2014 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, I already checked that, that wasn't me. Alexandr added this to ID as questionable 16/08/2014 on molbiol.ru and Vasily Sergienko confirmed the ID.

06.09.2014 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Everything is fine. And anyway it was not worth it to start. I repeat: I do not want-forced, and I used to try to fight back, when I think that a person enters and need it. Please God do not repeat this: anyone. Suffice an example of Sergey Kotov.

06.09.2014 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Jodis lactearia / Irina Nikulina Idiochlora ussuriaria / Basil Sergienko.

06.09.2014 15:07, Basil Sergienko:

Letter missed, Idiochlora

06.09.2014 14:52, Basil Sergienko:

This is not Jodis but Idioclora ussuriaria

06.09.2014 14:42, Peter Khramov:

If something I have not removed from these negotiations, throw off the link to poudalyat.

06.09.2014 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

06.09.2014 14:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I looked thoroughly, yep, this is aglaja (no "eye" spots in the underside between the middle and the marginal spot rows).
Undersides to compare:
Argynnis aglaja (Linnaeus, 1758): http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/30779
Argynnis adippe (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775): http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26493
Good I added them back then :) Moving.

06.09.2014 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena viciae ? (not sure): more opinions needed.

06.09.2014 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena lonicerae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.09.2014 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea serpentata / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

06.09.2014 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is garden, never saw in wild nature. Same with ilia and iris males (latter is rare), in the mud, on feces (Homo sapiens also), never on flowers :)

06.09.2014 13:55, Basil Sergienko:

serpentata

06.09.2014 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pushed the button wrongly. Sorry.
Argynnis adippe as a version, though closer hindwing underside needed.
Anyway closer pic needed. I added earlier undersides of both species.

06.09.2014 13:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

06.09.2014 11:47, Irina Nikulina:

I saw more than once ilia on garden flowers, it especially loves Dianthus barbatus), every year I as well shoot it near Borovskoye, added here http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/22019

06.09.2014 11:38, Alex Lender:

Sadly no another shot. Why guess-work?) I thought the angle was quite good, both underside and upperside were seen.

06.09.2014 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Any chance to have a closer look? Better underside. This angle is a pure guess-work.

06.09.2014 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leaning to the first one, yet more opinions needed.

06.09.2014 11:23, Alex Lender:

Argynnis aglaja?

06.09.2014 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena filipendulae / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

06.09.2014 11:19, Alex Lender:

Idaea serpentata? Or ochrata?

06.09.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

06.09.2014 11:17, Alex Lender:

Zygaena filipendulae ?

06.09.2014 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudoips sylpha / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

06.09.2014 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, you're right: http://www.jpmoth.org/Nolidae/Chloephorinae/Pseudoips_sylpha.html
Moving according to habitus.

06.09.2014 3:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Miltochrista miniata / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.09.2014 3:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time to get it out of incognito :)

06.09.2014 3:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Today I'll check at home. Now at work, won't move from the phone.

06.09.2014 1:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks. Somehow I usually see camilla on Socrates plants (water hemlock) :) and yeah, their larvae mainly feed on raspberry. Curious gender...
Another idee-fixe is to see once at least Apatura on flowers, their imagoes are quite weirdos as for food choices :)

06.09.2014 1:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Similarly to #33054: Pseudoips sylpha. Could be moved?

06.09.2014 1:03, Peter Khramov:

To the author: would you please confirm if this specimen was IDed by Alexandr Zhakov....

05.09.2014 22:47, Irina Nikulina:

Hardly indeed. First time I saw them on flowers. As for our local camilla, I shoot it every summer around Borovskoye in July on forest raspberry flowers, all bushes are covered with them. I added here one of shots: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21619

05.09.2014 22:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Kind request not to move to confidently identified before imago. Thanks.

05.09.2014 22:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Oh.... Eh.... This is surely Lacanobia thalassina, I've got it grey with yellowish lines...

05.09.2014 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, just some idle curiosity, is it common thing Far Eastern Limenitis rest on flowers? Our local species, only L. camilla happens to visit Apiaceae whilst L. populi hardly ever, I saw just once on Apiaceae. Rather in the road mud. Here even some Asteraceae, as I see. Wonder :)

05.09.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, do not I started it on the public, but could not answer .. Chica there all this srach. In its moth wrote that Chica.

05.09.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agree, amazing thing )))

05.09.2014 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Lord, in fact, I now do not have time to figure out, is a commentary on the outer side of the issue: let's agree that the moderators of its violent negative emotions had on the public not to splash.

05.09.2014 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another postscript about the plum moth from SN ind. there is generally killed in hlaminu and has the right to exist without any kind of problems while on the site is present in excess.I did not ask any questions there: let it be, just noticed that ragged, and then put the normal female :) Come and treat others the same way: the benefit of a large space at the site and the place does not draw appear. A material never is never too much unless of course it is not entirely obvious g ....

05.09.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fill: I in fact wrote in his commentary that confused ... And suddenly, these thoughts aloud there.

05.09.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, too, could not resist seeing these questions. I put once again, because it was necessary to define it. Someone knew that this one kind? Thanks to my namesake: Undetermined. I do not abhor just put in a vague, if not know. Moth This is not from my balcony and from Meshchersky lowland, and it is a huge, wild edge of swamps and forests, and there could be anything.Therefore, I try to put everything out to the maximum. Vaughn put obskuratu stale because only one photo on the website of the Gennadich. And this kind of a little bit. By the way, these females from different angles. On the phone difficult to write ...

05.09.2014 17:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, are you going to respond to a request ?, answer here and not defile the site. To me it is also true, just also could not resist.

05.09.2014 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.09.2014 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.09.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here I also quit. The explanation below.

05.09.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria mathura / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2014 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2014 11:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Beauty indeed!

05.09.2014 11:57, Irina Nikulina:

No doubt clear bella!)) Pity we can't see all the beauty in flash pic!

05.09.2014 11:32, Irina Nikulina:

Yury, I was digging these two last winter, still got doubts) You've got there Ectropis crepuscularia lutamentaria ssp. Graeser, 1888 which is rather different from European crepuscularia. Here I wrote about that: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27640

05.09.2014 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

05.09.2014 10:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexander Belousov Alexandr Zhakov.

05.09.2014 8:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia pusillata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.09.2014 8:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia pusillata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.09.2014 8:39, Basil Sergienko:

E.pusillata

05.09.2014 4:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr! There's another species alike, Ectropis excellens. What's about that? Can't get it myself.

05.09.2014 4:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Timandra paralias / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.09.2014 4:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well let keep it there then (yesterday checked). Seems time to get to Far East ones, no chance to escape :)

05.09.2014 0:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Think the same, agree with two comments below. Timandra paralias.

04.09.2014 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lost in these ( Any chance to identify?

04.09.2014 21:34, Irina Nikulina:

Evgeny, is this one really moltrechti, not Limenitis amphyssa? Afaik, moltrechti has only one long white spot in the middle similarly to the one in your another pic http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32752.

04.09.2014 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Turns out Anacampsis blattariella. Alexandr, your thoughts?

04.09.2014 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Grapholita delineana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.09.2014 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Two same opinions + mine third :) Moving.

04.09.2014 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I see Timandra paralias it is: it has thicker purple line against dichela, yet can't decide to move it surely.

04.09.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.09.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.09.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.09.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

04.09.2014 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

04.09.2014 17:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pardon me, I meant Pandemis.

04.09.2014 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Archips sp.

04.09.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, what they're resting on? Archips sp. and imago distinctly reminds some of our locals :)

04.09.2014 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tentatively identified due to no underside.

04.09.2014 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena phlaeas / Tentatively identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.09.2014 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So what to do with this one? There are 4 species, Lymantria dispar and Lymantria monacha are most known :) Grisescens clearly doesn't pass... Finally got matura, typical thorax pattern, I gave the link over a month ago... Swore not to ID any from Far East, so that's the question :)

04.09.2014 16:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria selene / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

04.09.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've got two species at the moment one of which http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32829 (supposedly oculea male) will be examined. Only mine are from Vladimir region, doesn't matter anyway.

04.09.2014 15:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, when you rack up the material in the Moscow region, or look welded specimens. and some of this genus. then you can say more than a habit prisushit certain types in the Moscow region. and with only the Moscow region. I do not venture to migrate to certain types.1000 kinds of shovel, there are several groups of genital here, because to them and should be treated, sfotografiovannyh in nature, caught, cooked and postaivl in appearance. The others are uncertain or when the determination to sort there. :) Only the rules of the game. if not cooked, but the spec says I know this region, is a strong possibility that it ...... then inaccurate.

04.09.2014 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No chance for this one to be examined :) Alexandr, decide where to move it. I preferred withdrawal. Still feel this is not oculea :)

04.09.2014 14:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I went very unfortunate: insects are not flying. Already cold fog and dew that even the mosquitoes were not ...... But he chilled "how tsutsik" (
We'll have to probably wait until next season.Combined installation of the Entomological lamp and three white lamps 9 watts powered by battery vyshepokazannogo showed himself well: the lantern itself worked about 3 hours and added. lights worked much the same.Of course, I came to the conclusion that the lamp 3 is oily and can be easily limited to one or two (in this case, and while the increase).
Photo adapt (drag with only the light sheet and rope: it is necessary to save space in a backpack):

And to prove that it is not personal photo night flying platform "Omutische" Gorky direction MOR, which is densely "seated" comfortable, with low lights DRL and apart from them there is no backlight. Not on lamps or close to them I saw no insects at all, while waiting for the train on the platform and a half hours. Here such here pies:

04.09.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)) I insist on my first comment, "Noctuidae, Amphipoea genus, species are not discerned by photo." No any certainty before genitalia examination. :))

04.09.2014 13:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I just do not know where to put it, Alexander. But there is clearly no oculea; fucosa , or lucens is. A fourth kind of Amphipoea crinanensis (Burrows, 1908) like as there is in the Ministry of Defense is only theoretically and then in the south of the region, and Lotoshinsky area where this shot is on the north-west of Moscow region. Here's about to flourish, you know .....

04.09.2014 12:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nomophila noctuella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.09.2014 11:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Nomophila noctuella

04.09.2014 10:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

You should not have it Basil, threw in vague, Peter the right is no accumulation of photographs on leave, let there be dangling in inaccurate, I repeat, all attempts to determine in appearance (habit) only work on a particular limited area. generally in the area, it's not working. Only cooking. :)

04.09.2014 1:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fact that the above trio IMHO "logs", "nails", or even something like this :) Seven is in some cases Krupnyakov Zhuchin. And then in the presence of appropriate boxes: in addition, that thick, they are also longer. For absolutely all our Krupnyakov enough 3. And tropics perforate log: spoil material.Maximum number three: he is as good at the plate. With butterflies in general with all the above and it does not need anything. For example: I have a Attacus atlas in the span of 25 cm. Itself very well in the top three feels :)

04.09.2014 1:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, where there MTS and there is an Internet. And here at home better than 3G it works for me: the wilderness, the people there: see the minimum load and towers ponatykano .... Progress, however :)

03.09.2014 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Internet, Internet yet!

03.09.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:) Good luck on Borneo I've now in Vladimir Meshchora spend the night in the woods. Trying to relatives, our insects to catch. Forest, quiet, romantic one. Nothing more is not necessary :)

03.09.2014 22:03, Peter Khramov:

Similarly to another pic of the species.

03.09.2014 22:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mathania agasicles / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

03.09.2014 22:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mathania agasicles / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

03.09.2014 22:01, Peter Khramov:

What do you mean I need to ... Drop examples, for which they usually use. And no running or unmarketable - have me questions too long gone. You just need to use examples.

03.09.2014 21:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

03.09.2014 21:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mathania agasicles (Hewitson, 1874)

03.09.2014 20:04, Svetlana Shchavelina:

I pass. Will these days to transmit greetings Vasily Feoktistov Borneo :) :) :)

03.09.2014 19:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you. And I have an Internet everywhere, so do not be surprised that I write :)

03.09.2014 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Amphipoea oculea / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

03.09.2014 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr please remove this one, definitely not oculea. I totally failed back then. Withdrawing (

03.09.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

4 .... 7 Drop once even for exotics. Most running for Krupnyakov 1 ... 3. For small things ... 00 0 (000 too harshly): Minucius not use.

03.09.2014 18:05, Peter Khramov:

Come on, good hunting!

03.09.2014 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All right, gentlemen, I jumped on the train after one. Only, would it did not rain, as well: I hope to collect someone :)

03.09.2014 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Young larva. Here's another alike: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/15515

03.09.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.09.2014 17:27, Peter Khramov:

People, and can assist in obtaining information for the store. Write pliz or clear reference to the examples - what number of pins for the public about bugs / moths are used? Something like: №1 for our blues, №2 our satyrs, №3 for the Swallowtail.Clearly, everything is about to make it easier to navigate for people who are not strong in the courses. Particularly interesting size 4--7 ...

03.09.2014 16:54, Peter Khramov:

Note: this is not a get-together, the meeting invited all users Lepidoptera.ru. The main thing - to unsubscribe in the subject, to be guided by the number of advance.
The timing: I suggest a Sunday or Monday, as Vasily Saturday not smagёt and Dmitry did not seem to come. Of these two days, I think it is preferable to Sunday.

03.09.2014 16:50, Peter Khramov:

Reference is always there, we had long been accepted infa without specifying the source.

03.09.2014 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here: http://www.gbif.org/species/128139195 why not do: "" Taxonomic status: Unknown species "

03.09.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now it's +13 degrees Celcius outside and some still fly around :)

03.09.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.09.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.09.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.09.2014 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can't agree on this. Rather Spilosoma punctarium, definitely not niveum.

03.09.2014 9:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

While I have the financial crisis. And his wife went to work, due to the closure of the company.

03.09.2014 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Someone would have clarified the validity of the type to date. I can not understand myself, alas (

03.09.2014 8:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter verbatim quoting a source in the MANDATORY the reference to him, not a crime. So there is no need to alter the mandatory "in his own words." This is a normal academic citation and "offended" the authors of the sources in that, on the contrary it is necessary to say thank you!

03.09.2014 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, and you're in any numbers at all in capitals? With some of that?

03.09.2014 0:28, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Get pliz, Meandrusa lachinus Fruhstorfer, 1902
A description of the goal to go ...

02.09.2014 23:33, Shamil Murtazin:

I am pleased at the weekend can go :)))

02.09.2014 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Translate Especially me nowhere, but technical and medical reasons I was not allowed to leave until at least mid-September, as well as grill you on the phone ...

02.09.2014 22:31, Peter Khramov:

I want to bring up the subject first in the system area, and then, if necessary, on the public. Initially, when I wrote the instructions to add about the kinds of information on the basis of sources, I specifically noted that, say, read, digested and un-subscribe in their own words. And everything is good.
Ho.A) People are not very much that adds
B) By myself I know what to write in your own words is much more difficult
B) Even if we quote the source exactly, we still divide it into sections, plus all stamped source plus our scientific themes,even where the legislation of the Russian Federation speaks of eligibility citation in the required quantities (and the need to calculate this ourselves).
I propose to change everything and normally accept quotes sources or quotes with minor changes, not just completely rewritten. Moreover, as I see it, we already have a full citation, iepeople often really something and not bother. As a result, people will be easier to add the Old, and we will be able to work with much larger volumes to add. And then I had a mountain of accumulated books to add information.
Among the shortcomings I see that the authors of the publications may simply be offended.Or can not? We are not stupid to reprint their entire species essays? Always quote the source. For almost every paragraph.
Here is such a question.
Who thinks what?

02.09.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just can be wrongly moved... I changed :)

02.09.2014 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha pamphilus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.09.2014 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I live mulberries :) You know.

02.09.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here also I think A. oculea. First to compare its shape, colour and spot pattern to mine: one species as I see.
Completely agree with that prof Irina referred to in the very beginning :)

02.09.2014 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

02.09.2014 18:48, Peter Khramov:

Dim, well-ka you cry the blues. Stoll hotels crowded? If the dough is a pity, there is always the workers and peasants options.
Getting the census. Who else magёt?

02.09.2014 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)))

02.09.2014 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one could be Amphipoea lucens, 50/50 probability. Sure just my humble opinion :)

02.09.2014 18:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.09.2014 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diarsia rubi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.09.2014 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agree: as well see rather rubi... Moving.

02.09.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, I got your steps :)
Just forgot to add "too" between "confidently" and "imho", here's my comment confusing :)

02.09.2014 18:10, Shamil Murtazin:

I can... )

02.09.2014 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Species level. Pay attention to the shape of its hindwings (oculea has much more "round"), also that one is itself more round :) And its "eye" spot........ As for this one, no sense to examine genitalia as it's female. Tomorrow if the weather's good I'll have a night out there to collect some more "oculea" (supposedly) :)

02.09.2014 18:02, Irina Nikulina:

Diarsia rubi?

02.09.2014 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Distinctions are clearly seen. Species or intraspecies level ??? Genitalia examination needed for dozens of different groups, then can be some conclusions made :))

02.09.2014 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hope this is the last step...

02.09.2014 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.09.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

So I moved those to tentatively ones !?!?!?

02.09.2014 17:51, Irina Nikulina:

Weird, I added this as male (only one pic amidst added today, grandinaria), and he somehow got moved to imagos...

02.09.2014 17:18, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps Timandra paralias http://catocala.narod.ru/geom253.html ? Hesitating between this one and dichela.

02.09.2014 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Typical antennae ;:)

02.09.2014 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.09.2014 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, early for moving to confidently identified, imho :)

02.09.2014 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here is it with clear distinctions in habitus from http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/33014. Didn't collect other species. There are also Amphipoea lucens in Moscow region and Amphipoea crinanensis (questionable) :)

02.09.2014 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, second time uploaded those next to each other. Still hope to get to know their habitus :) They do differ...

02.09.2014 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.09.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.09.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.09.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.09.2014 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.09.2014 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.09.2014 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily :)))

02.09.2014 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Picked about 2km off #32829 male, so high certainty these two are one species.

02.09.2014 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Somatina indicataria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.09.2014 15:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia tripunctaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

02.09.2014 15:38, Basil Sergienko:

E.tripunctaria

02.09.2014 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2014 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2014 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2014 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2014 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2014 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2014 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.09.2014 15:18, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion it Scopula virgulata (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

02.09.2014 13:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I will not go. There is no place to spend the night.

02.09.2014 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanchra persicariae / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

02.09.2014 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanchra persicariae / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

02.09.2014 10:01, Andrei Komrakov:

Melanchra persicariae (Linnaeus, 1761)

02.09.2014 4:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I confirm: the changing system works perfect, just like a Swiss watch. Using that since first monthes of this year and honestly can't understand how it can be any confusing :)

02.09.2014 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did the right thing in a separate topic. Frankly he wanted to do it but somehow nekuzyavo there it was to start.
According to the subject matter. Come with me to Omutischi 3 September weather permitting (call each other if that) and see how, in practice, in the fields of this business works. Places there are good and should be something to fly, even in spite of the time.Light should now be enough until the first train to Moscow in abundance. And exposure outside in the woods no ...... I must you from theory to practice sum up :)

02.09.2014 2:37, Peter Khramov:

If people from other cities will be on show in Moscow, September 13--14, at the same time we can arrange vstredu Lepidoptera? Himself on display (more on the bursa) can not participate and do not particularly lively, but a couple of hours with the people in which the thread to the institution met.On Friday, there or on Sunday about these numbers? Who thinks what? Who is ready who unprepared?

02.09.2014 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I did so, and the results of previous wills comments.

02.09.2014 0:34, Peter Khramov:

I stand here a discussion of entomological lantern of the topic of special offers.

02.09.2014 0:18, Peter Khramov:

It's okay replaced. Let's call each other and do everything at me, then there shall be neponyatnok. Write me in the mail when it is convenient to you to do.

01.09.2014 15:07, Alex Dumchus:

Periphoba augur ?

01.09.2014 14:54, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. 32989

01.09.2014 14:42, Peter Khramov:

Alexander upload Fautua again and send me her number. Then do not do anything, I'll check again, call each other and to clarify that where not happening.

01.09.2014 12:48, Alex Dumchus:

Well, some mystic, I again removed the photo, and then another. Though laugh, though you cry again .. What add? or it will be very soon

01.09.2014 1:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cook would later :) But two opinion also good .... Put yet another when the House find myself (at that appearance will be better). Well, would collect a series, but it comes somehow one by one and you can say "mad" is the scoop (very difficult fresh halls).

01.09.2014 1:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

but only two days were observed. :)

01.09.2014 1:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is an opinion and not a confirmation. :) Cook, and it will be defined. :)

01.09.2014 1:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and you try to discharge the battery "to snipe", then slide into the socket and turn after a short time, and I think you see the essence. I repeat: the dim glow of lamps during the beginning of charging it is normal in such a luminaire design. By the way, my design turned weighing about three kilograms. (12c. 9a / h.+3 × 9 W) It is acceptable to drag the backpack + This UV lamp. I plan to try this thing all together in the field, on the night of 3 to 4 day if I feel that will be the flight of perspective and have to go :)

01.09.2014 1:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Properly done, it is not touched. Alexander, by the way to return to the site. A long time since you could not see :)

01.09.2014 0:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could be as well lucens (less likely fucosa), still I see it more as oculea. Would be great to see its hindwings to clear that out.

01.09.2014 0:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala electa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.09.2014 0:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala electa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.09.2014 0:03, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala electa?

01.09.2014 0:03, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala electa?

31.08.2014 23:51, Peter Khramov:

As soon as we have there has been a misunderstanding, then I explain.
Again.

The site consists mainly of so-called entities. For example, species of other taxa, photos, copies of literary sources, those in the Community. And users manipulate these same entities.
Each entity has properties.For example, photographs - is the number on the website, the image file, the author, date taken, and other comments. Pay attention: the image file - it is one of the only properties of nature (although very important, even fundamental).Theoretically, an entity may change any of the properties, but that it remained the same essence as that was, it must have at least one unique attribute, which never changes. This property is for still images, and other entities - Id, a unique number.If you downloaded separately two identical images - they are two different entities with two different numbers, even though the original image file and all the signatures to it may be the same.
If the theory is clear, now to practice:
You have downloaded in the photo gallery №1 ezkemplyara butterfly №1.A year later, we made the picture better and for the same instance / angle etc. uploaded a better image - fotorafiya instance №2 №1. In this case. You can not. Remove. Photographs. Room. One. Instead, you need to have photos №1 (an entity, not just a picture, remember, is not it?) To replace the property "image file" in the new picture.Alternative explanation: if you do not have the fifth tooth, you do not need a new fifth tooth next to the seventh or first, you need a new fifth tooth flat on the fifth place of the old.

If something remains unclear - ask, I will explain once again.

31.08.2014 23:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I call also not risk transferring :)

31.08.2014 23:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

31.08.2014 23:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Eugene.

31.08.2014 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexandr, I said here more than once that the species of this gender could be solely IDed by pics in case phenotypes are known for this area, also sizes needed. Please check European Noctuidae, they do vary in spots.

31.08.2014 23:30, Eugene Karolinskiy:

trivia

31.08.2014 23:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia agestis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.08.2014 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colocasia coryli / Confidently identified / Maria Pozdnova.

31.08.2014 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colocasia coryli / Confidently identified / Maria Pozdnova.

31.08.2014 23:02, Maria Pozdnova:

When searching for the flight of time "in May, Russia, the European region center" Colocasia coryli the list is not included for some reason

31.08.2014 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And this is or that: without a difference - take foty turned a 2 identical turned and they go under different numbers :)

31.08.2014 22:05, Peter Khramov:

As I wrote, the two foty completely identical. Ie New has replaced the old. What Trouble something?

31.08.2014 21:52, Peter Khramov:

I put the two together and tested lantern. I admit that there is a difference, but at the level of "have you got nervous," ie, at least I knew where some - hardly would guess.

31.08.2014 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

32964 On the phone sealed, of course. I have a PC at hand will not be until the next day.

31.08.2014 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Basil, specifying the number doubles, apparently, you're sealed. About deleting a thousand times already explained why it is necessary to replace the complete duplicates and not deleted.

31.08.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander. The day after tomorrow downloaded for such loyalty, though, caught a little later, a couple of kilometers. from the place of capture.

31.08.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Melitaea didymamale looks. I will not tolerate is: 2 nights only on the phone.

31.08.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you're so daring this photo disputation with this incomprehensible :) Have a normal analogue underside numbered 3264
Alexander, moderators are not engaged in the removal of that we are not magicians and can only be removed :)

31.08.2014 18:31, Peter Khramov:

Well these two pics look totally alike. You just uploaded the same pic or replaced with that the old pic long ago. If something goes wrong, please give me a call to make it together online despite using capslock with three exclamation marks. Why?..

31.08.2014 18:09, Alex Dumchus:

No double anymore, I uploaded new pic #32964 cause the previous one somehow disappeared whilst I was changing and this one was kept despite I did everything recommended. So this pic to be removed and #32964 to be kept. Won't remove or change anything more!!! Let the moderator does that.

31.08.2014 17:25, Peter Khramov:

Please give a link to the double (who knows its number).

31.08.2014 17:12, Alexander Boldyrev:

I see this is not oculea but some Amphipoea (looking at that specific spot)...
All mine A. oculea have that dark "eye" spot whilst others amidst the species have no any or just some ordinary spot. Anyone please comment that dark "eye" spot in the middle round spot in oculea.

31.08.2014 16:59, Alexander Boldyrev:

In my view, the definition of Basil - true. A. oculea differs from other larger (relative to the size of the wing) and more rounded kidney-shaped spot. Also, the shape of the wings - shorter and wider than the other species. The site insectamo.ru types Amphipoea defined Matov AY from photographs.

31.08.2014 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, won't do anything. Turns out double. Can't get it, why reupload pic instead of changing with new one :)

31.08.2014 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now I see from my phone the new pic instead of the previous one, will move it where it should be. Just to group that with underside pic. The author can do it himself.

31.08.2014 12:20, Alex Dumchus:

It doesn't as I said in the previous post. Remove it yourself.

31.08.2014 9:06, Alex Dumchus:

Again the same parsley. I tried to replace, remove the new photo. Everyone is give it more time and more will do nothing !!!

31.08.2014 4:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, if you are interested in my opinion. That was at the very history of this practice in the use of this equipment. Then he stood still plugged in a couple of days and everything fell back to normal.The lamp is still on one power supply, assembled according to the classic, low-frequency circuit as a so-acid batteries to charge more than anything else made 50 hertz transformaor + rectifier, and pulse not BP, which under the same dimensions of the circuit gives high currents.And any battery pack in the irritable state has a lower internal resistance than in the charged and poreblyaet correspondingly larger current charge (except for Ohm's law is nothing new is discovered). Standard charging current of the battery is acidic 1:10 containers, and for that it was he 0.4A and charge them in a shock within 14 hours.Built-in low-power transformer there, because powerful is simply not fit in the envelope of the lamp. and to charge the battery he needs more time .... and the battery itself takes the lion's share of the PSU power. Therefore, the lamps should be to fully charge the battery light is dim because they simply do not have enough food.Lamps consume too well (on average: the battery capacity divided by the time the work lamps and obtain current, which consume lamps). Eau vkraitse I sketched :)
You can certainly present here more and more deployed, but why? After all, the site is dedicated to butterflies :)

31.08.2014 0:22, Peter Khramov:

And so it happens. People will go to Cuba ...

31.08.2014 0:12, Peter Khramov:

Headbands seen and new lamps. Transformer enough, you can simultaneously charge and light. Light has a right less bright (for a man) than other UV lamps, as at this, as I wrote earlier, the peak of the desired range is much higher, respectively, in the wrong (what we see), less light.But if the first light shone brighter and then (it is) - dimmer, that's when one must understand what could be wrong.

30.08.2014 22:47, Peter Khramov:

I may misunderstand a little. Question: why the new pic wasn't moved here to change the previous one? Or the moving feature doesn't work again, Alexandr, eh?

30.08.2014 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably was just the battery is well seated and now he gains while consuming a larger than normal current. Try to hold the charge longer and then turn on the lamp. The thing is that in this Lamps and battery powered by a single transformer, which is just not enough to eat all at once.

30.08.2014 20:43, Alex Dumchus:

What does the ACC., When it is on the network? Just my previous (I gave Peter a photo) shone brightly. Although butterflies are flying on one and the other. But it might still Peter checks if new lamps on the rim. In conventional fluorescent ring means. that soon there will be a black square of Malevich, the test of time - I have a bunch of tanks is

30.08.2014 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I should add, in my opinion: this circuit from a bulb is a plus. If you burn the spiral, you can simply turn the lamp sockets changing places and it should work again. Thus, the lamp life is extended by half. But he did not try: this is purely theoretical.

30.08.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The rim is normal for such lamps included under the scheme, which is used in such lamps (all similar). The fact that there works a heating spiral, and operates simply as a second electrode. From this non-uniformity, and the rim of my mind. And the light is dim: means acc. it is necessary to charge for longer :)

30.08.2014 20:28, Alex Dumchus:

By the way, Peter. Every day I turn on the lamp. Lamp UV light is very dim, in contrast to the picture that I gave you in the email. And the lamp appeared at one end of the large gray bezel size 4-5cm. Can a marriage? The second lamp was immediately with the rim. I can give the photo.

30.08.2014 20:24, Alex Dumchus:

Petr, ok. Remove this one and keep the latest with underside.

30.08.2014 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, there are sometimes inspiration ... And agree: 3h9 = 27 watts. And yet +16 watts of ultraviolet radiation, which is in the lantern. This is a fairly "surezno" without generator and XRD catch ....... 43 watt light, however :)

30.08.2014 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Why remove? Just change this pic to the new one, that's it.

30.08.2014 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well to remove then (as said before) :)

30.08.2014 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Basil, without question, if these do Kaifu, so why not do it?

30.08.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you would not believe, but it is ready to test mode :)

And consumes just 3 lamps is relatively small current of 9 amp battery:

And it will be the case convertible.That is, it will be possible to connect as anything: if you want a lamp, you want two, and you want all three at once :)
It remains only to terminals prisobachit and forth :) All my butterfly .....
I train with a soldering iron to 12 years old make friends :)
And I have the radio engineering education, and the case and all the basic parts on hand :)

30.08.2014 19:32, Peter Khramov:

Just a second lamp with a standard lamp. Get 3 UV plus 1 normal for illumination and zero gimor. This is when absolutely nothing to illuminate others.

30.08.2014 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

Yep, that's it.

30.08.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something made me to show the world plans to establish additional lighting that will be used in conjunction with this flashlight. The benefit of the farm found all the components for this. The Soviet Union to learn to be economic :)
I have three 12-volt fluorescent lamp, which by default are in the minibus "Bull": http://www.specautopartner.ru/tehnika/opisanie/zil-325000-13/

They set about to such a lamp "cool white" light to 9 watts:

To nourish all this economy plan from this battery:

TX battery: http://www.delta-batt.com/upload/iblock/cf4/delta_hr_12-34_w.pdf
The entire structure is placed on two sheets of A4 paper:

It remains the case for connection into a whole, but it is the task 30 minutes in the presence of the wires and it is solvable average fifth grader Soviet high school. On buduyuschey week I will have to try this system. As you are the "bricks"? :)

30.08.2014 16:25, Peter Khramov:

By the way, yes. If anyone has a familiar contractors who can mold plastic products / metal / derevyahi, reported. It may be interesting for boutiques.

30.08.2014 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, the dimensions of the battery: http://h-energy.ru/razmer_akkumulator_6v45ah/
Junk can not find: tossed likely a lantern disassemble already too busy. Therefore, given the link.

30.08.2014 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To Petr's request, is this the same specimen as here http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32947 ?

30.08.2014 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lexias pardalis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus Not identified.

30.08.2014 1:06, Peter Khramov:

Is it the same specimen?

30.08.2014 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Compression is not high, but the scripts are too tight and the truth is worse than Photoshop with the correct settings. To maintain the highest quality (if you are sure that it is the quality of the original available) is shipping foty inscribed in 1024x768 (ie1024 in width or 768 in height depending of type of which party before goes beyond that), then the script will not reduce Fautua to maximize, and will only be in a restore Zhpeg (though it makes it worse Photoshop). Sometimes the topic about better options, but have so far.

29.08.2014 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry subspecies Pieriballia viardi mandela (C. & R. Felder, 1861): http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/16705?
Or independent type?

29.08.2014 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Did. Only the right kind of Automerina beneluzi Lemaire, 2002 . A Michener in 1949 invented a kind :)

29.08.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Automerina beneluzi.

29.08.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euhampsonia serratifera / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.08.2014 13:35, Alex Dumchus:

Euhampsonia serratifera

29.08.2014 12:29, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, can and sharpening the moment you look? .. :) Loading 32956, 32957. Clearly distinguish the scales on the wings. Actually, this is the main problem when shooting straightened copies. And then somehow all in a lather.
(32956 in the right half of the butterfly Rasfokus, so there it is ok)
Maybe it's not a very high quality compression of images the script? .. Or jpeg compression is high ...

29.08.2014 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.08.2014 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.08.2014 10:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

With regard to sacks net. From a muslin cloth? Which fabric shell rim truant? To test for me is simple. Done ash from the cigarette on the muslin. For a couple of seconds, leaning against the lamp muslin Vietnam. And the mowing along the spines and branches. All will be clear. My wife is ready to sew bags from a proven tissue obechayka- jeans. Petr- if interested - write.

29.08.2014 9:53, Peter Khramov:

OK. No problem, let it be a lamp replacement.
There were a test bags nets. All standard sizes from 30 to 65 cm. The colors - black, white. The bags are better than Entosfinks and paradox. Excellent tissue. Users Lepidoptera, which is in the list of authors (ie brought to the site some data) - free of charge to the test with the condition withdrawal no later than the end of September.

29.08.2014 8:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

He was going to Cuba! What Lanka?

29.08.2014 8:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Two soboy- carry with it more than three kg !!! But the lamps (replacement UV), it's better to be redundant than to bite your elbows

29.08.2014 8:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

is male

29.08.2014 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Just remove this one and ok.

29.08.2014 7:56, Alex Dumchus:

Now doubting. Dmitry IDed this one as Tanaecia iapis, so this pic to be removed for sure, at least off L.pardalis not to confuse anything. Petr please remove it yourself.

29.08.2014 7:52, Alex Dumchus:

I didn't cause Dmitry had had doubts about the very ID, later he identified that. May I change or you do it yourself?

29.08.2014 0:14, Shamil Murtazin:

Please unite with the group - 32956 and 32957.

29.08.2014 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I got that Alexandr had reuploaded the same specimen. Dunno why didn't he change with new one.

28.08.2014 23:38, Peter Khramov:

If double, why wasn't joined to the new pic?

28.08.2014 23:10, Evgeny Komarov:

I would say that this Marumba saishiuana (ssp ??). Nothing more has not found similar, although not shown in the form of Vietnam.

28.08.2014 22:58, Peter Khramov:

If the weight is not very important - and take just another flashlight. If strongly - to use the lamp in a mode of one lamp instead of two (the effect is not reduced by 2 times and less).
ZY Yes, and if the same lamp will be needed as a replacement in case of break / lose, etc. - Yes, there is a replacement.But again, it is only in the event of porazbivat and that burn out, should not be afraid.

28.08.2014 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I was lying in the household waste is exactly the same acc., Which is in the lantern. It is better to measure the size here and write sizes when the come home from work (now with the phone write and difficult to walk on the links).

28.08.2014 21:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, understood, thank you!
A little surprised by this decision, but the price is not biting :)
Can you measure the space in the lantern under the Accum? Already there are a couple of ideas to extend the life of up to 6-7 hours. It should be on the knee posobirat))) By weight is 100-200 grams per harder (if I understand you correctly, and is used here such Accum - http://www.oldi.ru/catalog/element/0110126/).For the price - plus another lamp =)

28.08.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've moved that one already. Petr, please remove this one, worst shot.

28.08.2014 20:33, Alex Dumchus:

Sorry, Dmitry's IDed already.

28.08.2014 20:32, Alex Dumchus:

Yep, and new #32947 to not identified.

28.08.2014 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Batteries are commercially available as accessories for the PC and bespereboynik etc.
Here is a link for an example:
www.oldi.ru/catalog/6633/

28.08.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Most, this lead to a dense electrolyte (such as Vaseline). These are still bespereboynik. Only bespereboynik 12 volts and a lamp that 6 volts 4 amps / hour. I am now testing this lamp because I know. And in an acidic condition of Ni Mh battery to distinguish.NiMH battery is essentially the same alkaline electrolyte with a thick :)

28.08.2014 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Corades cistene / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Corades cistene / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 19:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Corades cistene

28.08.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catasticta scurra but not sure

28.08.2014 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So to remove this one?

28.08.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Delias acalis / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Delias acalis / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Taenaris selene / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Isma iapis Tanaecia iapis.

28.08.2014 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Isma iapis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaecia iapis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 18:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Taenaris selene

28.08.2014 18:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias acalis male

28.08.2014 18:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tanaecia iapis

28.08.2014 18:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tanaecia iapis

28.08.2014 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stichophthalma louisa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stichophthalma louisa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 16:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Probably not lead, and nickel-metal hydride? .. Or nickel-cadmium Lead ... - that means splashing acid in not gud for mobile equipment. Charges may be due to non-powerful power supply.
Lanterns will almost certainly alter for other batteries, larger capacity. Review will, I hope.=)
Spare parts: yes, breakage and guarantee cases where just takes and is not included. There whether bad soldering, or Accum defective and so on.

28.08.2014 16:57, Peter Khramov:

Obviously, in Sri Lanka.

28.08.2014 16:48, Peter Khramov:

Batteries are complemented by: charging a long time, I repeat, it is not Li-Ion, it's the usual one. In the memory area in half a day is recommended. It would be nice to lithium would be more concise and easier but may at the same time, but such nifiga do. Lamps to 8 watts maximum spectral power in the range 365--370 Nm.This is their afigitelno Unlike many other UV lamps, which for our purposes, never as effective because A) the peak they are in other bands and B) that the peak is much lower than those here.

28.08.2014 16:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

One booking, but a review in April 2015. Here there and check it on all cylinders, including 8 flights

28.08.2014 16:30, Peter Khramov:

For normal lamps are not the banner and UV claimed life - up to 10,000 hours with a decrease in emission after 5000 hours of operation no more than 20%. Therefore replacement lamp will be needed unless at some breakdowns. Type of smashed timber ... Batteries built and civilized does not change. Normal (not Li-Ion).As for the exact resource of information is not seen, but it can be damaged simply by the frequent use - at much in the foreseeable future is unlikely.
In TTX, yes, it would be more convenient, but the site is no such form. If not found in the lines - the weight of about 1.6 kg.
My participation in the exhibition broken off.Maybe I can come across the same number of individual exhibitions by those who will be in Moscow.

28.08.2014 16:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And how much are optional lamps (plus the required performance characteristics for UV lam especially !!!)

28.08.2014 16:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Question on the battery! How much is charged, there is an opportunity to buy them a couple more?

28.08.2014 16:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Forgot how with spare bulbs and batteries is the case? .. In the following season, with the active use will equipment failures.

28.08.2014 16:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, this? .. Http://lepstore.ru/catalog/1928
At the exhibition prinesёsh?
It would be convenient to see the characteristics of the goods in a separate plate and not in the text box.
Such as - weight (very important), what kind of battery costs. I want to take two light bulbs. And battery screwed)

28.08.2014 16:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Book me a single installment on the year)))

28.08.2014 16:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

90% Taenaris. House will look, and then collected the tropics uncertain

28.08.2014 15:48, Alex Dumchus:

Please add the form: Automerina beneluzi, Michener, 1949

28.08.2014 15:39, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitry, done. Pic and underside #32947.

28.08.2014 15:25, Alex Dumchus:

In fact, there are three books Monastery AL "Butterflies of Vietnam" 1st Sailboats, Nymphalidae 2-, 3- Amatusidy

28.08.2014 15:09, Peter Khramov:

Pre-tested and Basil Alexander lights to attract insects into the light went on sale. Spezza for users Lepidoptera.ru registration date to 15.00 August 28, 2014 - 1800 rubles. Spezza runs until 12 September, inclusive. Mandatory requirement - a review on this product on the website of the store.
Gizmo is very good. This true - I recommend.ZY And the effect of the mercury, plus a few UV altogether transcendental. So there are no restrictions on electricity - combine mercury vapor lamps with UV lamps.

28.08.2014 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Charaxes bernardus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.08.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Female.

28.08.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Female.

28.08.2014 10:50, Basil Sergienko:

Yes, like it, the female

28.08.2014 10:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What specific book?

28.08.2014 10:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stichophthalma louisa

28.08.2014 10:27, Alex Dumchus:

Or somewhere would find this book http://www.sevin.ru/menues1/index_rus.html?../news/550.html

28.08.2014 10:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

But the underside !!! Louise, of course !!!

28.08.2014 10:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It seems to me it aberrants Stichophthalma louisa, but certainly not Stichophthalma uemura. Need underside to 100%

28.08.2014 10:07, Alex Dumchus:

Or Stichophthalma uemurai gialaii, Monastyrskii & Devyatkin, 2000 (2010.02.15) ???

28.08.2014 10:06, Alex Dumchus:

Most likely the Stichophthalma louisa eamesi, Monastyrskii, Devyatkin & Uémura, 2000.
But I was wrong mb

28.08.2014 9:56, Alex Dumchus:

http://www.collector-secret.com/index.php/ins/b/amathusiidae/

28.08.2014 9:54, Alex Dumchus:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/35636-Unmounted-butterfly-Stichophthalma-DEVYATKINI-2013-VIET-NAM-/201157414240?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2ed5ea8d60

28.08.2014 8:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And where we Ruslan Salmanov? Here then succor the people !!! (((

28.08.2014 8:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It seems Pieriballia mandela

28.08.2014 7:46, Alex Dumchus:

Will add near days.

28.08.2014 7:45, Alex Dumchus:

Charaxes bernardus

28.08.2014 4:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For a specific, extremely unusual and ulёtannogo copies in the trash. with photos: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32824 need it. And in general not necessary. Type in the old one and it is very difficult to confuse with someone else. Although very changeable.

28.08.2014 4:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptophobia cinerea / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 4:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptophobia cinerea / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 4:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Later fix that if that :)

28.08.2014 4:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it is necessary to conceive the genus and species. Later: now is not the time to do it.

28.08.2014 4:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perrhybris lorena / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 4:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perrhybris lorena / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesperocharis hirlanda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 4:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesperocharis hirlanda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 4:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Corades tripunctata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 4:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Corades tripunctata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.08.2014 0:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Photo shows the species-specific characteristics, confirm the correct definitions. :) - Very short palps.

27.08.2014 23:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why is the picture

27.08.2014 23:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I fished in Vietnam, female and two males

27.08.2014 23:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

nothing moved. I'm not sure

27.08.2014 23:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leptophobia cinerea

27.08.2014 23:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

27.08.2014 23:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We need underside

27.08.2014 23:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

where the top ???

27.08.2014 23:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Perrhybris lorena

27.08.2014 23:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hesperocharis hirlanda

27.08.2014 23:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Corades tripunctata

27.08.2014 22:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

what deviatkini? at the underside of the miracle there?

27.08.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Taenaris selene / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Taenaris selene / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Taenaris selene / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia iphita / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Taenaris selene

27.08.2014 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia iphita / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Taenaris selene

27.08.2014 22:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia iphita

27.08.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe dura / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe dura / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lethe dura (Marshall, 1882)

27.08.2014 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Inaccurate, because not looked Rozovsky may in Turkey, something very similar is :)

27.08.2014 22:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Underside needed, seems Tanaecia gender.

27.08.2014 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalonidia contractana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.08.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

27.08.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia pusillata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia pusillata / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also quite be. She has time volley 8 once again in August - September. I bear, but is put in inaccurate.

27.08.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, guys :) Alexander, and the second can be here too: they are from one batch :)

27.08.2014 22:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Denticucullus pygmina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Denticucullus pygmina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Denticucullus pygmina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Denticucullus pygmina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.08.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe. And Orekhovo-Zuyevo district., Moscow reg., From here all photos, close to the borders of Petushki district., Vladimir region. Essentially 20 kilometers from point to point. We'll wait for Alexander, what say?

27.08.2014 22:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Big tnx for your job!

27.08.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

27.08.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

27.08.2014 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

27.08.2014 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

27.08.2014 22:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

can Eupithecia pusillata

27.08.2014 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eupithecia sp.
This is apparently a question to Vasily :)

27.08.2014 22:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

it can Denticucullus pygminus ??

27.08.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably one type with: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32940

27.08.2014 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Last night brought a whole series of these babies. I lost with the definitions and ask to help. Mythimna sp. a big 2.4 cm.? Or someone else? Especially a couple of copies. I put :)

27.08.2014 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Up :)
Ouch, imho this is not croceus, maybe better move this to not identified. I already added two undersides from different regions.
Moscow region: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/29128
Abkhazia: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32939
Please compare to this one...

27.08.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

6 in., And 4 / h. Not only for feeding two long tubes 8 watts with the drive for them. Sexually 3:00. and further "kukuesh" with a campfire in the woods, away from civilization: the circle, so to speak, "one boar but owls" :) There certainly need more capacity or take 2 lamps.

27.08.2014 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, in the "refinement of classification" has been written. I just cleaned it and suffered much like the author.

27.08.2014 20:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Ozgur, do not worry, Alexander will identify it. =)

27.08.2014 20:17, Shamil Murtazin:

As practice shows, not much happens BATTERY! Always a little;)

27.08.2014 20:16, Shamil Murtazin:

With glasses joke. The list itself - something sensible. At least for the participants' understanding of what we are fighting (to which we go).

27.08.2014 20:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not see on the phone, where the author has written the name of a photo, but it's not right, another subfamily. Write correctly when Rozovsky look, it is certainly Turkey. :)

27.08.2014 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I certainly wildly sorry, but I think there overzealous editing towards the gray / black and white?

27.08.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.08.2014 19:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aphelia ferugana / Confidently identified / Ozgur Kocak Not identified.

27.08.2014 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Miltochrista miniata it is? Ragged male :)

27.08.2014 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The author called type "field missed" :)

27.08.2014 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

27.08.2014 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphelia ferugana / Confidently identified / Ozgur Kocak.

27.08.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's cold already. Up to 10 went down at night (the flight of close to zero, respectively), but some collected. In general, yes promising thing: you can work. The only thing: the battery capacity is poor (two to be more). Reviewed later write, summarize, and once more rolled up to her.

27.08.2014 18:27, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, Thanks for the offer, truncated or write callback. Regarding functional - this is for highly formalized community members with the sea or when points can be into something to translate.

27.08.2014 18:24, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, corrected.

27.08.2014 18:19, Peter Khramov:

In general, I think that the topic should still be linked to Lepidoptera. Ie if the trip report, then, though, along with cockroaches, but the modeling must also be a minimum. On the other hand, I just do not watch much difference between community areas, and potentially an opportunity to share blog.And because the smoking room to fit anything and at the same time it may well be in the format of a blog. Here.

27.08.2014 18:13, Peter Khramov:

As lantern happy?

27.08.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

27.08.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colias croceus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.08.2014 13:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Niphonyx segregata / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.08.2014 12:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Last night, in the Vladimir region., In droves to the light to see me flying. And then the same thing: an old pine felling stars :)

27.08.2014 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Andrey Ponomarev.

27.08.2014 12:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Niphonyx segregata Identified Matov AY ZIN

27.08.2014 7:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I wrote already about this bug! Please note: Photos http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28995 is uppercase on the pages of two types - Neptis philyra - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23211 and http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23212 - Neptis philyroides. A must illustrate only the last, according to the latest definition - Neptis philyroides. And if you look at photos Neptis philyra, that this photo is not there - only on the page!

27.08.2014 6:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cnethodonta grisescens / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.08.2014 0:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Cnethodonta grisescens Identified Matov AY ZIN

26.08.2014 23:41, Shamil Murtazin:

looks like cockroach )

26.08.2014 20:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Beetles, spiders, mites :) Reports on trips, including not purely "nasekomyshnye" ...
Technicians pictures, including not only the objective photographing ...
Etc. etc. - Adjacent areas, but not Lepidoptera.

26.08.2014 19:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, so long, and let them be - try podsobrat of these points of view, and genitals can then to some reasonable conclusion we arrive. Species there are not rare.

26.08.2014 15:38, Peter Khramov:

Not on the subject - it is, for example, what then?

26.08.2014 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Base: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/pap/10610001.html

26.08.2014 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium chironides / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.08.2014 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium chironides / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.08.2014 14:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! Something was thinking that's what. And basically a blog to write articles on the topic of Lepidoptera?

26.08.2014 13:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nola aerugula / Zoran Bozovic Meganola albula / Basil Sergienko.

26.08.2014 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aporia gigantea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.08.2014 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aporia gigantea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.08.2014 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

ThisAporia gigantea: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/pie/20025001.html
Round leaves.

26.08.2014 13:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dodona ouida / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.08.2014 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dodona ouida / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.08.2014 12:09, Basil Sergienko:

Something seems to me that this-Meganola albula

26.08.2014 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, there, Alexander - I understand :) Near the mother a teacher all my life (physics): the truth is not teaching for a long time :)
Today I want to shine at night in the Vladimir region. again. The truth is cold right now, but maybe himself nadybat someone. Places where the wild and therefore interesting :) And closer to autumn, and can be kind of interesting.
And right enough for us perepiratsya. No offense :)

26.08.2014 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not be surprised: in Vietnam it is "full-length":) And with the nominative: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/nym/760030001.html

26.08.2014 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-aureum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.08.2014 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-aureum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.08.2014 23:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, I swear, I teach, is sinful, but it professionally. :)
Basil, if I perenashu Palaearctic species, you do not have to carry them back if I'm wrong, I will correct myself. and that your comments are often not the topic sound. I really like the photo Evgeny Komarov very high quality, superinteresnye.vidy.but if it is not correct that it must be corrected

25.08.2014 23:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, I agree with your comment. corrected. Hurry. irreversible attention to is not exactly accurate.

25.08.2014 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

25.08.2014 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, the second time you make a remark about filling in the fields:
Date and time of the shooting / fishing and Location shooting / fishing
These fields should be taken as a rule.
This is especially true if you are downloading photos indefinite butterflies.

25.08.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.08.2014 20:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! I do not even dare to argue with the fact that confidently distinguish these types is only possible on the genitals. Therefore, as my and your definition of a series of "likely". Compared not only with photos of the work, but also with descriptions of the figure.I repeat - I do not insist on fidelity to its definition, but from our discussions can be a rational conclusion - no genitalia - definition of inaccurate and consequently, most of the pictures of nature Dyscia conspersaria / innocentaria is placed in the ill-defined. Something like that.

25.08.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.08.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suffice memo to a photo, that it is the lead-out.

25.08.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

25.08.2014 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What I did that statement? Alexander, I just saw your pretty categorical transfer suggested master photo. Sometimes I think you just do not quarrel with someone is sometimes.

25.08.2014 18:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, please do not make such statements, we have agreed about the Palearctic. and the grounds for transfer back I can not see.
Eugene Kamarova, I suffered this photo after consultation and arguments Basil Sergienko. Of course it is desirable to do the opposite, first argument, then the transfer. I offer my apologies for that.With these views we have dealt several times. 100% guarantee can only cooking. But now define more accurate than inaccurate :)

25.08.2014 18:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dyscia conspersaria / Alexandr Zhakov Dyscia innocentaria / Basil Sergienko.

25.08.2014 16:12, Basil Sergienko:

1, the word "confident" too much in your comments, I said that I probably now hold this view
2 if the butterfly is not cooked, the authoritative opinion even spices, only a guess.
3 You say that the article was determined by Zolotukhin, an issue on which the image is similar to your copies.and why were 2 under fagariey clearly fagarii?
4 I had the opportunity to images konspersarii to be 5 volume GME, there is not very similar to your copies. (Although it is not clear why g.Skou took copies.the beginning of the last century)
5 and of the arguments (they are weak, 100% only cook) -innosentariya butterfly common in the Crimea and yugah, usually with a good pattern, spotty fringe, often with a median shadow and shine. Konspersariya rare butterfly usually not very pronounced pattern and shine otsutst.
I'm a span Offline (Geometridae.Ennominae) will set 3100 and 2% conspersaria innocentaria- compare.
I stand by my opinion that is not the ultimate truth.

25.08.2014 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then one carries Vasily: I :) And I carry it once again, and did not dare ....... Eugene, I can bring her back. Return?

25.08.2014 15:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Caligula japonica / Female.

25.08.2014 15:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female

25.08.2014 13:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Caligula japonica

25.08.2014 12:41, Evgeny Komarov:

All my pictures this kind of determined to work Pugaev SN, Zolotukhin VV moth genus Dyscia Hübner, [1825] (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of the Lower and Middle Volga. Eversmannia 2006, vol. 6. Evgeny Tsvetkov and tested. Therefore, I was surprised by a steady transfer of Basil picture innocentaria, especially given the variability of the species of this group. Well would be inaccurate.Looking arguments, and then you can naperenosit ...

25.08.2014 12:34, Shamil Murtazin:

List of tasks - an interesting thing, by the way :) right away tempted to fasten functional with glasses and achivki :)))

25.08.2014 11:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

On weekdays, there is neither time nor effort, because a new job. Output in the field. Winter pridet- be free weekend (late October-early March). From 7 March to 1 April in the fields in the tropics. If there are specific zadaniya- write.

25.08.2014 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene arguments apparently here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4403 (post dated 08/14/2014 22:39). To me, they seemed inconclusive and therefore did not carry. I look forward to, so well as you explain.

25.08.2014 0:00, Evgeny Komarov:

It does not agree with the transfer of photos from Dyscia conspersaria in Dyscia innocentaria. I would like to hear the arguments of Basil. This photo at the time checked E. Tsvetkov.

24.08.2014 13:38, Peter Khramov:

Got it, see.

24.08.2014 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, when loading the form, having specific name with a hyphen photo Georgia as uncertain and into the admin panel, which was then pull out. For example, it was my first Xestia c-nigrum, and now pulled Polygonia c-album from Fedor Pudovikova. This happens if the ship photo "of a kind." This is the system ...

24.08.2014 9:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Well agree. Nothing similar but Grapholita delineana found on the web.

24.08.2014 5:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Third generation appear.

24.08.2014 5:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

24.08.2014 5:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.08.2014 4:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Since last season. This year did not collect it.

24.08.2014 4:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, it is necessary to specify the date.

24.08.2014 4:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.08.2014 4:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lythria purpuraria / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.08.2014 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dilipa morgiana / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.08.2014 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dilipa morgiana / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.08.2014 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pah-you ... No it's not Chitoria, and the maleDilipa morgiana: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/apa/750150001.html
I bear :)

23.08.2014 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chitoria sp. Then pass ....

23.08.2014 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah .... it was lucky that she was alone in the family :)

23.08.2014 15:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's a certain photo copies. :)

23.08.2014 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sergey Novitckiy Basil Sergienko.

23.08.2014 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sergey Novitckiy Basil Sergienko.

23.08.2014 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orgyia antiqua / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.08.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There are 3 (40): all the geese are on the site and the remaining 2 are not suitable. Just did not carry myself because things never with color brushes did not come across: All white or yellow with us :)

23.08.2014 15:21, Sergey Novitckiy:

Yes, at first glance, it is (or rather it), "unlike in any way" on Angerona prunaria. On the wings there is no thin dark dashes, no larger spots on the forewings. The fringe on the wings of one color, without spots. In addition, the plum moth like as one generation per year (by the way, I have never caught plum moth - this is the first time).But now upload pictures and straightened butterflies butterfly close-up of the head, where it is clear that palps very short, do not speak in front of a flat forehead, which corresponds to a description of the plum moth (from "krokoty" palps protruding forehead).

23.08.2014 15:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

23.08.2014 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Of the two types of Seaside Orgyia, it is best suited. endure :)

23.08.2014 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Orgyia antiqua? By analogy with this image: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2248

23.08.2014 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.08.2014 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.08.2014 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

23.08.2014 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Actias artemis / Igor Ivannikov Actias sjoqvisti / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.08.2014 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Igor, I would like to clarify the geography This Sumy region. or Krasnodar?

23.08.2014 13:49, Peter Khramov:

The difference between the images is, I confirm. Not very much, but what I said Vladimir seems to see (the first two more faded / withered / low contrast). The reasons are not clear to me, I'll check.

23.08.2014 13:46, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Shamil, but what have the viewer? I say that all 3 copies of the image I see myself at the same brightness, contrast, and then download the complete gallery of two of the three losing brightness, contrast.
Can remove them and try to download the new? But I fear that more will turn any hemorrhoid.

23.08.2014 13:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Finish writing

23.08.2014 12:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, so what came :)
Generally today Pts. bad we fly (due to cold nights, apparently). Sam then zadubela three sheets: a fire had already bred :)

23.08.2014 12:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeah, we talked. :)))
Of course, even if necessary, to clean it is not necessary and is not offered, only made a remark on quality. Now we wait when it will be after cooking to put a "for sure." :)))

23.08.2014 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So for this site there is a jackdaw "view inaccurately defined" (in vague can not clean). Well, then time will tell: the good have something to dance :)

23.08.2014 12:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I did not say that the site "BUTTERFLIES and beetles MOSCOW REGION" wrong definition. I said that it is impossible to determine the pictures from the site, because they do not show species specificity, there is not any sample, if you take a lot of butterflies each type, then you will see that from the same habit, there are instances in every kind :)))

23.08.2014 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I personally know the owner of the site where the link resulted in a long time, and to cooperate with him (on beetles, true) .... So I have a reason to trust its definition. And so, yes genitals, certainly. Well, that is assembled male, by the way. It is useful, but only for verification :)

23.08.2014 12:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phyllosphingia dissimilis Marumba gaschkewitschii.

23.08.2014 12:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not want to say. I say that kind of Amphipoea reliably determined only on the genitals, in the wing pattern is not species-specific details.Yes, a specialist in appearance, knowing well the local fauna, proven phenology and biology of species living on the set of data may be very likely to say species, and that there are mistakes, if not cooking gene.

23.08.2014 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, do you want to say that I was deceiving my own eyes, and you should not believe them?

23.08.2014 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is clearly visible difference - a very nice anecdote, but unfortunately there is no place for it :)))

23.08.2014 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, take a scoop 8 is Europe Tab. 3 and see. All websites do usually amateurs, and they wrote a book, which anaziruyut , with all available information. if there is no book, I will send :)

23.08.2014 11:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, Peter - remove this photo in Marumba gaschkewitschii !!! I have clearly slipped roof!

23.08.2014 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In 3 of the four types of Amphipoea specified for 8 spravochka:
Amphipoea oculea: http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1363-amphipoea-oculea
Amphipoea fucosa : http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1361-amphipoea-fucosa
Amphipoea lucens : http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1362-amphipoea-lucens
How is this habit, they are not defined? It is clearly visible differences. And all kinds of photos I think there are best suited to the Amphipoea oculea

23.08.2014 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Join the song :) Yuri, append the name of the subspecies in the form: Cuculia pustulata ssp. fraterna (Butler, 1878)
And do not write the name of the subspecies as a species. The other day was loaded here this butterfly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32756 as an independent Antheraea oculea and accordingly fell to moderation and had to smash his head a bit. Here are just now "dot the i" placed :)

23.08.2014 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2014 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.08.2014 10:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Vladimir, and you have them in what looked to this? .. If laytrum or other RAW-converters - they use their cunning profiles.

23.08.2014 10:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia pustulata.

23.08.2014 10:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, what can we found :) I'll keep in mind, thank you very much! ..

23.08.2014 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.08.2014 10:10, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Eugene could question the monitor? I have their pictures on TN matrixes do not perceive. The first two loaded (above mentioned) images fail brightness-contrast still quite noticeable. A copy of the original such as # 32836. Hence, the question arose. If this had happened in compression saytovskim engine, then change to photo # 32836.

23.08.2014 9:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Vladimir! For fun, you looked uploaded photos. I have a feeling that all three pictures the brightness / contrast is absolutely identical. By the way the pictures are very good. Of course I do not see your original photos.

23.08.2014 8:33, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Hello!
When loading Xanthia togata three shots in two (# 32834 and # 32832) to change the brightness, contrast, and the third (# 32836) Download as you are.
What is the reason?

23.08.2014 7:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parantica melaneus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.08.2014 7:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parantica melaneus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.08.2014 7:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aporia agathon ?

23.08.2014 6:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura ilia / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

23.08.2014 6:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If you follow the lines, already stated in the commentary to Yuri http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5796 then I agree and stand.

23.08.2014 6:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, ifCatocala orientalisregion it is necessary to add Sinev. Novocherkassk is a 11 if I'm not mistaken? Refer it to the neighboring, and apparently this is the twelfth "edge" species distribution in the west.

23.08.2014 5:58, Yuriy Karpov:

Proceedings Korshunova Yu Gorbunova and PY much fresher.

23.08.2014 3:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Cucullia fraterna ?

23.08.2014 1:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That this male is not so tattered, by the way: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32532
Previous yes, tattered: but arrived early. Alexander, by the way about pronubu remind you that you promised to put there.
I unfortunately only 4 copies. I come, although a candle every night. But we have a lot of it does not happen, and I doubt that her MO of someone else lay out this year (God forbid, that was not right).In connection with this, I wrote the first comment, which has put in inaccurate. And you know why. So as the other two here are inaccurate. "Well I can not spread deliberately undefined" : the two photos here once again is obviously undetectable. This well-assembled: So all is not lost with it.And following your logic: it is necessary to prohibit all upload photos in the nature of all kinds Amphipoea: there are no claims to the quality. Claims to the fact that even in the future will never identify such photos.

23.08.2014 0:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I know you want the best, we just have different notions about it the better. :) About the balcony, I mean torn Noctua pronuba, know how to read :). Vasily site without a difference, you are fed mosquitoes or not, the first time you see a butterfly in his or not. And every time you upload a photo of poor quality, I give up.About the definition I'm not saying everyone can be wrong, but certainly not defined butterflies spread as certain, well, I can not. Here on this race, there are no precise definitions. Do not confuse the site, with the collection, it is possible to replace everything and sees her man and his guests, and go to the site, hundreds of people, and it is desirable to be respected. :))).Basil, I'm sorry for the harshness, or anything personal, have great respect for your hard work and efficiency. :)))

23.08.2014 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I might add. Alexander, is there is at least one photo where you can see the expanded and lower kpylya? Appear: means can be removed: A. Zhakov did not like it .....

23.08.2014 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not from the balcony, and more than a hundred kilometers. from this balcony (read geography). I wonder what-if fed mosquitoes in swamps Meshchera all night? And I do not know, will there be more to catch the light (this year, at least).

23.08.2014 0:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Well, there is already a photo ... and without wings to hold the belly of a will)
something like that =) cooking himself for the winter save.

22.08.2014 23:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra berbera / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

22.08.2014 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Laid :))

22.08.2014 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

If one copy. and so it is better to wait for the better. This applies to all photos, even if for the first time came to the balcony :))) Only if there is no picture at all species, while a few can be worn or very high quality photos. and if a bunch of photos, then what? Just to increase the tsifiryu vyholozhennyh photo?

22.08.2014 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well now you can cook in the future :)
And we have to fly (in the region of 8), at this time should theoretically all four species given for the region: the task is the more (

22.08.2014 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil is very simple, photographed in nature, caught, brewed, identified and placed precisely defined. For straightening, first photographed and then varish I always do, and all that, the truth is, sometimes, varish first, and then you scratch his head, and photos? :)

22.08.2014 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And the other is not, I said. And if you cook genitalia: without any belly will appear :) Or not? In general, they do not need to put and remove photos in nature at all? Because obviously undetectable?

22.08.2014 23:21, Shamil Murtazin:

I repeat the request about the separation from the group, along with photos 29684

22.08.2014 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

And what a torn and shredded on site?

22.08.2014 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Habit nothing. need to know what flies, then it is possible that either speak, and with reservations, I only cook them and the percentage of 1/4 of surprises.

22.08.2014 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Glitches some strange ....

22.08.2014 23:17, Shamil Murtazin:

cm. first post :)

22.08.2014 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Epiblema scutulana / Vasiliy Feoktistov Epinotia trigonella / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.08.2014 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I gathered only one "to the point" :) habit she just oculea to fit most.
And so, yes, I watch out: maybe ask someone to cook (in combination with the rest of the family, coordinate and put for this reason).

22.08.2014 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

22.08.2014 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

22.08.2014 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

22.08.2014 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuriy Karpov Andrei Komrakov.

22.08.2014 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

22.08.2014 23:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

I have it or who did not show. :)
Give let cook and will be exactly, there is a not a photo. :)

22.08.2014 23:05, Yuriy Karpov:

Remove uncertain Melitaea britomartis # 29453 29520 29521 29522

22.08.2014 23:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, it (the definition) jumps back.

22.08.2014 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epiblema scutulana / Vasiliy Feoktistov Epinotia trigonella / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.08.2014 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So tempted to put it in the exact ..... And it is impossible, but (

22.08.2014 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I had a fight in an empty room and calmed down :)

22.08.2014 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epiblema scutulana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Epinotia trigonella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.08.2014 22:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epiblema scutulana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Epinotia trigonella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.08.2014 22:51, Yuriy Karpov:

Over agree with Argynnis niobe, by the same female. A.vorax darker.

22.08.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate since it indicates the time for the flight of Region 8 May - July. Already the end of August, and I have collected a series of last night ..... Maybe it's the other one?

22.08.2014 22:42, Yuriy Karpov:

Plebejus argyrognomon (Bergstrasser, 1779)

22.08.2014 22:41, Yuriy Karpov:

Plebejus argyrognomon (Bergstrasser, 1779)

22.08.2014 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura ilia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.08.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apatura metis / Evgeny Komarov Apatura ilia / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.08.2014 22:33, Yuriy Karpov:

Apatura ilia

22.08.2014 22:32, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 22:24, Yuriy Karpov:

Apatura ilia, on the underside of the front wing bright black spot, which does not have Apatura metis.

22.08.2014 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria euphrosyne / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Olga Skripko Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuriy Karpov Olga Skripko.

22.08.2014 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris napi / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

22.08.2014 22:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria euphrosyne / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

22.08.2014 22:12, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 22:12, Yuriy Karpov:

Boloria euphrosyne.

22.08.2014 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:10, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter scattered via Shamil group: there are different types. Confused, apparently.

22.08.2014 22:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you for your comment, Yuri! Can you give a source of information about the spike in the leg? ..
Just engrossed Kurentsova AI companion He certainly writes for the Far East, but the meaning is, I think, is not changed by this. So ... there are many subspecies and hybrids that genital analysis does not help :)
The first replica of idas had do not insist.

22.08.2014 22:09, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 22:08, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 22:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

On the machine hammered, I endured moths :). apologize :)
But Basil, there is Catocala deducta (Eversmann, 1843), when I first boiled, it turns out that there are two kinds, but then I saw that the features of the walk. probably the same story that the couple Catocala puerpera (Giorna 1791) - S.orientalis Staudinger 1877

22.08.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria euphrosyne / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria euphrosyne / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:05, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander Vasiliev two confused you :)

22.08.2014 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Basil Sergienko Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.08.2014 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala elocata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.08.2014 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

22.08.2014 22:02, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 22:01, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, you look it, please :)

22.08.2014 21:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, the second generation.

22.08.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oeneis tarpeia / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

22.08.2014 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation of what? We have it flew away long ago.

22.08.2014 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dyscia conspersaria / Evgeny Komarov Dyscia innocentaria / Basil Sergienko.

22.08.2014 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dyscia fagaria / Evgeny Komarov Dyscia innocentaria / Basil Sergienko.

22.08.2014 21:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dyscia fagaria / Evgeny Komarov Dyscia innocentaria / Basil Sergienko.

22.08.2014 21:48, Yuriy Karpov:

Oeneis tarpeia (Pallas, 1771) a little bit, "killed."

22.08.2014 21:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Inaccurate, because there is still Catocala orientalis Staudinger, 1877, or not :)

22.08.2014 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala puerpera / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.08.2014 21:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)))

22.08.2014 21:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.08.2014 21:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Crocota tinctaria / Tentatively identified / Sergey Novitckiy Angerona prunaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

22.08.2014 21:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria euphrosyne / Confidently identified / Yuriy Karpov.

22.08.2014 20:58, Yuriy Karpov:

Lovely underside is Boloria euphrosyne incopuly /

22.08.2014 19:34, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.08.2014 19:33, Basil Sergienko:

Even if "unlike she did," it does not mean that it is not

22.08.2014 19:18, Yuriy Karpov:

In my mind pictured Plebejus argyrognomon; by definition, have Plebejus idas shin clearly visible spike, as in the photo №29598, absent in the previous species.

22.08.2014 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, not on maleAngerona prunariaunlike like she did. Or "killed life" so?

22.08.2014 16:52, Basil Sergienko:

Generally krokota mountain views, in the Ukraine in the old collections recorded at two points of the Lviv region., And it's kind of like, Angerona prunaria

22.08.2014 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, then go and go. Alexander, and you then Fill subspecies.

22.08.2014 15:10, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, I wrote about it to the coolant. down polyphemus / I like it goes A.occulea

22.08.2014 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Instead of Antheraea polyphemus Cramer, 1775 is the hour? More precisely subspecies her Antheraea polyphemus oculea Neumoegen, 1883 : http://eol.org/pages/29511961/overview Something as a separate oculea not find anywhere else ...

22.08.2014 14:18, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris moresca (Schaus 1906)

22.08.2014 13:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Again! Photo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28995 illustrates just two types - Neptis philyra - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23211 and http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23212 - Neptis philyroides. A must illustrate only the last, according to the latest definition - Neptis philyroides.

21.08.2014 19:57, Alex Dumchus:

Automerina auletes, Michener, 1949

21.08.2014 19:57, Alex Dumchus:

Automerina auletes, Michener, 1949

21.08.2014 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary, of course. If sushestvuet field on the page, it means that they have to fill. Although it is a butterfly :)

21.08.2014 19:31, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea occulea

21.08.2014 19:07, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. I'm not about that. I do that on underside whether to write the time and place, if I combine underside with top ???

21.08.2014 18:57, Peter Khramov:

No, the second is not necessary. It will still be removed.

21.08.2014 18:48, Alex Dumchus:

Chavoy not understand something, ie If I combine foty, it is still the second fote need to set the time and place of capture ???

21.08.2014 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

These photos were taken at the next. Alexander doddelyvay things done :)

21.08.2014 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / 0000-00-00 00:00:00 Taenaris schoenbergi / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus / 2010-07-00 00:00:00.

21.08.2014 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, as I told you long ago that the only way possible. With winter yuzayu himself and gradually you get used :)

21.08.2014 16:47, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. Happened!!! But only after a call to the page type and upgrade.

21.08.2014 13:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Refresh the current page in Firefox, you can also click if the so-called "hotkeys": F5 or Ctrl + R

21.08.2014 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In Mozilla Firefox 25.0.1 and under Win. 7 64 bit. button is called "Reload current page" and is right in the line where the address of the page (where I put the red daw).
So I have:

21.08.2014 11:54, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. I use Mozilla

21.08.2014 11:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Aha! So that's it - this image shows another view: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23212 - Neptis philyroides. There it is. It is necessary to remove this image from the page http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21457 Neptis philyra - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23211!

21.08.2014 11:20, Evgeny Komarov:

On the page of the form Neptis philyra - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23211 is the title photo (top), but the type of photographs it is invisible - no it to the left!

21.08.2014 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.08.2014 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.08.2014 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.08.2014 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.08.2014 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.08.2014 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.08.2014 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.08.2014 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

21.08.2014 10:17, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, after "finally removed Library" and "old and remains", visit with old photographs (which "remained") and press there Ctrl + F5. You completely refresh the page along with a photo, and you will see that it is still overwritten.And the old showed you, because it is kept in the browser cache on your computer.

21.08.2014 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And it is necessary to go to a page of an old photo and click the "refresh the page." Alexander, write what browser are using and I'll post a screenshot that it is necessary to click.

21.08.2014 8:29, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. Please fifth point more: it means obnovit- exit the site, then enter or both? I have a page with the old photos do not come. I go to the BOS, watch old number and write the new. Then I clicked. All

21.08.2014 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Pretty boy.

21.08.2014 0:01, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, I spent checking out of your Akka, all the rules. And Basil system is exactly the same as yours. I think we should all call and simultaneously do online. Come as a thread on the weekends these loans.

20.08.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I add a fifth point: it is necessary to update the page with the old photo. And then all should stand in its place.
The system run-me personally: the very first. And it works well :) I have at least ....

20.08.2014 20:37, Alex Dumchus:

For pervyh- it had not worked!
1.Vykladyvayu photo
2. I find the number of old photos
3. LC in the new photo Old books picture for replacement.
4. As a result, the new photo is deleted, and the old and remains.

20.08.2014 19:20, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, if there are glitches with the replacement of ph, write the steps, what you're doing, and what is impossible. And tell me, did it work before or do you never move did not work?

20.08.2014 17:48, Peter Khramov:

Discussion of the structure of members / moderators / facilitators on the site. A set of new people with new functionality.

20.08.2014 16:31, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. That is nonsense turns. Just uploaded new photos Taenaris schoenbergi. Then I went to the BOS, went to the last photo, dialed the number of the photo that is replaced, clicked - resulting in more pictures Remove, and had to retire early. Did you say something beguiled. And by the way, for some reason still have not removed the photo, which I wrote to replace?

20.08.2014 15:30, Alex Dumchus:

By the way, Peter. I could edit your photos from those that are not perefotal.

20.08.2014 12:51, Peter Khramov:

Well, do you interface for editing and unsubscribe in the mail.

20.08.2014 12:51, Peter Khramov:

I'm from there and took this assumption. In general, I need that there Perophora sanguinolenta at the moment. But it is not clear ...

20.08.2014 11:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, that may result in the divine form with the editors, I will. And that is not even very good. good photo species absent from the site, but it is suitable for identification or complementary distribution is useful - do not argue! Therefore, I subscribe to it, let alone the rest of the best of their skill level :)

20.08.2014 10:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Look here http://taxondiversity.fieldofscience.com/2013/05/macrolepidoptera.html From what I saw there, it is! And as far as this information is correct ...

20.08.2014 10:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Did!

20.08.2014 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have no doubt, and put into precise: http://www.hantsmoths.org.uk/species/2217.php
It's a pity not to take the goose .... There were other objects and containers under it in the backpack was not :(

20.08.2014 4:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

20.08.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, put the date, please. To all three. Apparently forgotten :)

20.08.2014 4:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.08.2014 4:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.08.2014 4:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.08.2014 4:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.08.2014 4:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.08.2014 4:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.08.2014 23:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Finish writing

19.08.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not know why, exactly, I had cut it at random today, alas.

19.08.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm inspired by this photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/9814
And he gathered still tailed doe. By the way: they often come across such :)

19.08.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.08.2014 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris dulcinea / Yuri Semejkin Pieris melete / Evgeny Komarov.

19.08.2014 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris dulcinea / Yuri Semejkin Pieris melete / Evgeny Komarov.

19.08.2014 21:04, Evgeny Komarov:

And this image is sent to melete. Yellow background underside of hind wings, spraying a distinct dark veins - did not get dulcinea.

19.08.2014 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.08.2014 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, you can finish the subspecies in his LK :)

19.08.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris dulcinea / Yuri Semejkin Pieris melete / Evgeny Komarov.

19.08.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris dulcinea / Yuri Semejkin Pieris melete / Evgeny Komarov.

19.08.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris dulcinea / Yuri Semejkin Pieris melete / Evgeny Komarov.

19.08.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I stand: even in comparison with other snapshots a clear difference.

19.08.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, let him in inaccurate they will :)

19.08.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ypthima pandocus / Tentatively identified / Male & female / Anna Gerasimova.

19.08.2014 18:50, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, that's right, it's about you, too: -) With work understand - too often buries recently. About insistence to fotam - so there are all easy if Fota technically bad, you need to make it possible for something more decent (not spending time with the car), and all.And it is not an art gallery, often foty interesting species / geography, etc. They made not great, but nevertheless are valuable.

19.08.2014 15:20, Evgeny Komarov:

From what I could see by the nature - the most similar. The likely inaccurate.

19.08.2014 12:37, Evgeny Komarov:

This, as I see it - P. melete. There is no such dulcinea distinctly dark spraying the entire length of the veins.

19.08.2014 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

19.08.2014 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

19.08.2014 10:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Sprinkle ashes because one of the two previously worked actively, and I think there :(. So much so loaded at work, which is something more serious than the view points of interest and sharing pictures are no forces - old, probably :). And your proposal quite rationally - the whole question of who will subscribe to the listed items.I would take 6 group, but I'm afraid that as a man, a lot of filming, find myself overly picky about the quality of the photo.

19.08.2014 10:31, Evgeny Komarov:

And here is the rear wing is not visible. Maybe Marumba jankovskii.

19.08.2014 10:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Marumba maackii - Exactly!

19.08.2014 9:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877

19.08.2014 9:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877

19.08.2014 9:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877

19.08.2014 9:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877

19.08.2014 9:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877

19.08.2014 9:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877

19.08.2014 9:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877

18.08.2014 22:40, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, thanks for the tip, corrected.

18.08.2014 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Iphiclides podalirinus Iphiclides podalirius.

18.08.2014 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK. I bear :)

18.08.2014 19:38, Alex Dumchus:

This year in my yard there were many, caught three of them, the rest was pootpuskal.Zhalko.

18.08.2014 19:34, Alex Dumchus:

Of course, for me it does not matter. The main thing that was the truth.

18.08.2014 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and that the picture pops up in soobshestve the appearance of comments to the genus Euthrix? There's the same kind of E. potatoria illustrates. Disorder in my opinion:

18.08.2014 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Patience, Svetlana :) Now the season is not over yet, and Muscovy. I am here today in the night, "in the field" was about: to catch the ultraviolet. Avos and lure someone.
At the very honestly accumulated dose of the tropics and still be revenue likely not define its long and (in winter they).But the long, winter evenings, I think to just reach the hands rummage ...... :)

18.08.2014 18:05, Svetlana Shchavelina:

So, gentlemen, my good, quite thrown my butterflies Borneo? Or hope "here come the winter is cold, free time appears, and then ...." Do not expect! The rest I will not leave you! I have already purchased tickets for the next! No one is tormented me, taking off, spitting when they are around you a chaotic mass, got into the mouth, ears, bosom .....

18.08.2014 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Catocala elocatathink? I can not stand because the southern species are not familiar, but only with the Moscow region of which we caught 5 kinds :)

18.08.2014 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Catocala puerperasort?

18.08.2014 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Luke gets it like: xestia c nigrum (without the hyphen), and should look like this: xestia c-nigrum . Maybe that's why?

18.08.2014 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Some strange glitch. It loads as it should be "out of form", but loaded as the uncertainty. And after it pulled out of the admin "in place."

18.08.2014 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Podalirius figured out already. Alexander, not vzrazhaesh if I leave the definition of Anatoly? After the file had called podalirius: Apparently, something went wrong at boot time, and this man really is rarely wrong.

18.08.2014 12:43, Alex Dumchus:

Definitely, I.podalirius! Verifies the underside, almost under a magnifying glass.

18.08.2014 12:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let it be beautiful ..... plusiinae still. Although very common everywhere :)

18.08.2014 11:02, Boris Loboda:

For the "Photos of nature" (if we understand by this survey live insects) are not always leg. automatic photographer. By beetles we share such a common practice, "funky" views. Especially when you brought from afar, photographed - why not let someone take pictures? According to this technology take off and butterflies and dragonflies.Even when taking the field if we assume the same Arthur something "good" I dug out and I take - I'm trying to indicate it was his, it's his discovery. Especially in the field of photography is time-consuming, if I decide to take assume day, and not to collect, I almost did not find, I do not have time to dig, I just rented it finds.Our usual practice to leave "collective", the photographer does not always work alone, even in the field.

18.08.2014 11:00, Peter Khramov:

I've got a separate issue hanging. Asexually.

18.08.2014 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here citing: http://insectamo.ru/component/content/article/98-hete/noctuidae/1502-xestia-xanthographa
The truth is not thought that in a few km. from the house of her spymayu :) And so, and during the flight of her 8 August - September.

18.08.2014 10:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The point, I think. He checked quickly to their sources :)
I'm just even in the head does not take reason, it xestia :)

18.08.2014 10:21, Shamil Murtazin:

but I is not sure ... online gallery small. be pieces of 5-10 for each kind of ...

18.08.2014 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.08.2014 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.08.2014 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diarsia rubi / Vasiliy Feoktistov Xestia xanthographa / Shamil Murtazin.

18.08.2014 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diarsia rubi / Vasiliy Feoktistov Xestia xanthographa / Shamil Murtazin.

18.08.2014 10:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bravo, Shamil bear :)

18.08.2014 9:56, Shamil Murtazin:

bright spot, near to the outer edge of the front wing, strange shapes. does not exceed the limiting vein. wing nearly uniform color, brown.
probably something else the third ...
Xestia xanthographa?

18.08.2014 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Try to ask it here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=475943
"You never know" :)
The truth is there is my question of March 18, still unanswered (

18.08.2014 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if the file is named "podalirius" , then I think it is not necessary to clarify anything, but must endure. Gaffe when loading it likely is. Just a question: whose determination to put? :)

18.08.2014 8:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Prioneris thestylis / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2014 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Prioneris thestylis / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2014 6:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.08.2014 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.08.2014 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.08.2014 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.08.2014 6:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander details (date, geography) to a picture it is necessary to put down :)

18.08.2014 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.08.2014 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Reisserita relicinella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Reisserita relicinella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No one else with us :)

18.08.2014 5:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctegretis triangulella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctegretis lineana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyonetia clerkella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyonetia clerkella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of the four species in the 8 most suited.

18.08.2014 5:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutella xylostella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree. And again, the same, only 2 types here.

18.08.2014 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caloptilia stigmatella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caloptilia stigmatella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia basistrigalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

18.08.2014 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudonia lacustrata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree.

18.08.2014 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catarhoe cuculata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree. And the choice is limited: 2 species just in the eighth region :)

18.08.2014 5:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OrDiarsia florida? But her time of flight of 8 June - July, but .......

18.08.2014 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Most rubi how it looked to me ..... corrections are welcome :)

18.08.2014 3:55, Peter Khramov:

Original file name podalirius, so maybe a glitch at startup. Although it is a pity ... and Basil, to specify a minute Anatoly really ...

18.08.2014 3:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctegretis triangulella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 3:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

18.08.2014 3:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctegretis lineana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 3:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree.

18.08.2014 3:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila selasella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 3:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Based on the time of shooting I think so. Put definition Irene.

18.08.2014 3:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I have the honor to know personally Anatoly and I think that the probability of error here is close to 0. However, it will be necessary to ask him to check. IMHO carry too early yet :)

18.08.2014 2:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2014 2:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.08.2014 2:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2014 2:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

18.08.2014 2:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 2:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 2:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

18.08.2014 2:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Such as a butterfly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32631?

18.08.2014 2:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila selasella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 2:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

18.08.2014 2:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila selasella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.08.2014 2:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

18.08.2014 0:36, Irina Nikulina:

Catarhoe cuculata?

18.08.2014 0:31, Irina Nikulina:

Agriphila selasella?

18.08.2014 0:31, Irina Nikulina:

Agriphila selasella?

18.08.2014 0:30, Irina Nikulina:

Cydia pomonella?

18.08.2014 0:29, Irina Nikulina:

Nyctegretis lineana?

18.08.2014 0:27, Irina Nikulina:

Nyctegretis triangulella?

17.08.2014 22:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Defined by Alexander Zhakov

17.08.2014 22:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Defined by Alexander Zhakov

17.08.2014 22:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Defined by Vasiliy Feoktistov

17.08.2014 22:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Defined by Vasiliy Feoktistov

17.08.2014 22:22, Shamil Murtazin:

interesting wing venation...

17.08.2014 21:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, and that mail Kazakhstan and Russia do not communicate with each other? ..
And so then we absolutely Kazakhstan next :)

17.08.2014 21:31, Peter Khramov:

Yes, now the maximum that can offer to residents of Belarus, and Kazakhstan - to the point of shipment throw to the border cities of Russia, and from there to pick up at your convenience. But it is convenient only for those who are not very far from the border.

17.08.2014 16:05, Alex Dumchus:

Oh, brothers in mind. Something tells me that this is a banal Podalirius. I caught this in Turkey, and it is close to Armenia. Yes, and our local - per person. In podalirinusa, rear wings, a red strip on the underside outlined two dark lines. Yes, and he will be brighter. Yes, and its habitat in the east will.Unfortunately, butterfly super rare, and it is not my collection. If necessary, I give underside of Turkish and Rostov. Comparison., Then remove foty.

17.08.2014 12:54, Irina Nikulina:

Beauty) Suppose Grapholita delineana

17.08.2014 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deilephila elpenor / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.08.2014 1:49, Irina Nikulina:

Lyonetia clerkella?

17.08.2014 1:42, Irina Nikulina:

Caloptilia stigmatella?

17.08.2014 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.08.2014 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Brush" is well developed boy ..... IMHO :) stand.

16.08.2014 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morophaga choragella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.08.2014 23:21, Alexander Belousov:

Too bad that does not work with Kazakhstan. We've got very dull! Full hand-made.

16.08.2014 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morophaga choragella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.08.2014 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Morophaga choragella

16.08.2014 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Morophaga choragella

16.08.2014 23:02, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Alexander. I do not know, unfortunately, that the more customary for the Kaluga region, looked in detail all the pictures, and to me it seems in some respects more like hohenwartiana. Of course, I could be wrong, waiting for the verdict)

16.08.2014 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.08.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.08.2014 22:37, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllonorycter populifoliella?

16.08.2014 22:37, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllonorycter populifoliella?

16.08.2014 22:37, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllonorycter populifoliella?

16.08.2014 22:26, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllonorycter sagitella?

16.08.2014 22:26, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllonorycter sagitella?

16.08.2014 22:16, Irina Nikulina:

Scoparia basistrigalis?

16.08.2014 22:12, Irina Nikulina:

Reisserita relicinella?

16.08.2014 22:06, Irina Nikulina:

Plutella xylostella?

16.08.2014 21:59, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllonorycter issikii?

16.08.2014 21:59, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllonorycter issikii?

16.08.2014 21:53, Irina Nikulina:

Eudonia lacustrata?

16.08.2014 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

16.08.2014 13:43, Peter Khramov:

Actually, the question.

16.08.2014 12:48, Peter Khramov:

In the English version only shows that perevedno automatically or manually. In the tape shows only the latest comments. Therefore, if kommntov were perevedny 5, and the last, the sixth, is not, in this case the tape will not be until the sixth is translated.

16.08.2014 10:42, Shamil Murtazin:

In the English version of the tape 14 with updates not updated (pardon the tautology =)

16.08.2014 10:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Thanks :)

16.08.2014 2:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pelurga comitata / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

15.08.2014 17:28, Peter Khramov:

Basil, thanks for the comment. A small request: leave comments relating to specific pictures in the pages exactly these photos. Website - living substance, today, "the rest" 2 shots, tomorrow - a dozen. IeOver time, your comments will confuse people, and if it is written on page foty particular, they say, it's not that kind, but this one, then certainly no confusion will arise. Ok?

14.08.2014 22:39, Basil Sergienko:

fagaria only that, the rest is likely to-innocentaria.
Both conspersaria also likely innocentaria (light so precisely)

14.08.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have one, it comes in the night and even then only the second year in a row :)
Earlier interposita was: Here is the mass, although this year no one is (Still, last year several times flew fimbriata: the ragged at all times.
Alexander, I live 10 km away. from Moscow to the east, in the center of nearly 150 thousand city.The geography we are different and therefore different types of common (do not like to turn "banana").
By the way: before 2012 I had enough pronuby ......... from North Africa (Egypt), however: there it is also common, and it carried me out in batches. And now the house at collecting ..... A drifter she really powerful and fast: yes :)

14.08.2014 18:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I photographed specially for you a dozen different shapes and males and females, without the kill rate, although the butterflies did not take, will not be straightened :(
In general we have quite a banal kind that prevents catching the light. trifle cleaner blows hawk moths and distracting. :)))
Coming home the other day to put pictures. :)

14.08.2014 18:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I photographed specially for you a dozen different shapes and males and females, without the kill rate, although the butterflies did not take, will not be straightened :(
In general we have quite a banal kind that prevents catching the light. trifle cleaner blows hawk moths and distracting. :)))
Coming home the other day to put pictures. :)

14.08.2014 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For the first time flew nepolёtanny male: I can not put it :)
Generally pronuby a lot this year, but as always: the majority of flies already heavily oblёtannymi and collect good specimens. for happiness.

14.08.2014 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Basil Sergienko.

14.08.2014 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ecliptopera capitata Ecliptopera silaceata.

14.08.2014 10:17, Basil Sergienko:

In my opinion, it E.silaceata

13.08.2014 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

13.08.2014 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

13.08.2014 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This still did not put .... And in general for the first time brought together :)

13.08.2014 10:46, Peter Khramov:

Firstly, with the different components will be different delivery of images. Secondly, there are a lot of things differently shown. Because of what we did not say, I can only see bonce. And what for you bonce, they also Zhuchin?

13.08.2014 9:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

https://www.google.ru/search?q=%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B0+%D0%B4%D0%BB%D1%8F+%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BC%D1%8B%D1%85&newwindow=1&client=firefox-a&rls=com.frontmotion:ru:unofficial&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=BvTqU5mlDILqyQOX7IDwCw&ved=0CBoQsAQ&biw=1366&bih=661

13.08.2014 6:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let me explain a little bit about the field leg. :)
leg. so and so it is relevant only for the collection of copies. Since there is always the fact that the author himself has collected insect. This indicates that the so-called Geographic etiketke- "passport" of any insect collector. Hence, always pointing gathered in the field of geography.For a photo in nature it is optional and there is enough of authorship photo, which is affixed a gun. After all, thank God no one would ever think to spread someone else's photo under his own name.

12.08.2014 22:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

12.08.2014 21:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

female

12.08.2014 19:10, Peter Khramov:

Pins is. Google right now, do not boo, not before. If there is a specific reference - Cleared see.

12.08.2014 16:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I do not mean for catching screens, about the light traps. Googling. Probably come to seminary. Pins are?

12.08.2014 15:34, Peter Khramov:

Fields will be different for different entities - copies of photos and collection, as well as simply findings / points, for example. In instances in a few days all run, and you can watch. Now there are 22 fields, but possible (and even likely) and further in future releases.

12.08.2014 15:22, Boris Loboda:

Well, maybe in a separate field leg., I asked why.
In general, the list of fields you can for example look here for example:
http://kharkov.naturalist.su/gallery/collection.php?collspid=59845

12.08.2014 13:44, Peter Khramov:

Will. The idea is to Bursa doldzhny already be, not just whether to February. Although hepens shit, all moget happen. I plan to start chetyrehlepestkovye (See above. Semicircular on the frame). The table will be.

12.08.2014 13:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Until February traps are? What kind of plan? You will table at the seminary?

12.08.2014 12:43, Peter Khramov:

About Basil leg implies that writing suddenly the field, not in geography. With regard to formalization, yes, where there will be announcements, there will be done and formalization. Definitely will be country and I think that the regions of Sinev also possible to use.About administrative districts / regions - not sure if it is necessary to formalize (probably enough to mention in the general field as in the example of Basil). Points will still be naoglyadnee.

12.08.2014 12:39, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, plan. I hope everyone will have time to production.

Shamil, here:

12.08.2014 11:21, Boris Loboda:

What does the "leg did not write?" It is also important information on fees. Or what it was about? Type default to the one who recorded the record?

12.08.2014 8:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, can you tell us more about the exhibition? Well, or a link to some)

12.08.2014 8:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Light traps do not plan to bring?

12.08.2014 5:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Boris the right question about geography drew. From myself, too, propose to issue at least, I would like this: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30780 natural leg. You can not write (it's just the name of the collector).
It will be necessary and I all their lux later edited in a similar way.

12.08.2014 3:26, Boris Loboda:

As for the card - it is of course a separate issue ...
Location shooting is desirable to formalize the regions - such as the country / region / region from the selection list with the possible specification of detailed text.
This will greatly simplify the analysis of information.
And plus this card - you can lay down a point on the map, even if no explicit bind (with some approximation).There are such things as "the center of the country," "center of the region."
And collectible copies. / Findings about the field - for example I have a base (for true weevils), there are quite a few fields, I can give an example.

12.08.2014 3:08, Boris Loboda:

What about links to Plantarium - links type work
http://www.plantarium.ru/ref/Echium%20vulgare
Therefore, I do not need anything special, all about the id and the like. References can form a machine, simply by substituting the name of plant taxa. By the way, practiced and synonyms.

12.08.2014 2:50, Peter Khramov:

Ok, happy povstrechamsya. Anyway we can arrange a meeting site users did. The NN last time not risen, perhaps, is to stir up in a simple way, in Moscow as gritstsa, all roads lead. Or synchronized with an exhibition in September.

12.08.2014 1:54, Boris Loboda:

Kind of like running properly ... :)

12.08.2014 1:47, Shamil Murtazin:

I seem to be a trip to your direction, Peter :)
I am pleased to see the flight of engineering. Even without the cost of shipping can and grab a single instance. When everything is for sure - I will write.

12.08.2014 1:38, Peter Khramov:

A lantern seem a noble obtained. Cockroaches even in urban conditions with pleasure on this thing fly, despite the small capacity. With built-in rechargeable battery so Vles - just feast for the eyes should be.This week, even with Basil's test, and if everything is final and bespovortno Ok, lay to the boutiques, and for users Lepidoptera, as always, will spetsusloviya.

12.08.2014 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Taki is now working correctly. Link at the top of each page (if you have not already logged in).

11.08.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A male forgot about (I'll catch the next time, "to the point" :) Laugh, laugh, but we kind of appeared in the mass quite a few years ago. And now flying so many Lycaon that in my experience the indigenous inhabitants of these placesManiola jurtinaalready against this background, and was not seen (
I do not whether there is a replacement, a local resident "interventionist"?

11.08.2014 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.08.2014 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

11.08.2014 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

11.08.2014 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Making ready. As you come - call, the contract for the delivery.

11.08.2014 12:54, Peter Khramov:

About landscapes


A) prepare a directory of landscapes, which can be directly invoked by describing species of butterflies on the basis of 100% coincidence of names, no. So here are foty may be of interest.B) The user does not always have enough information or time writing separate blogostati a major post in the general theme of which was then seen.And then you can put foty butterflies and a pair of photons landscape - and is interesting and informative, and useful to the narrative of the resource, and there are more, then discuss as compared to the case where only the lined butterfly.
B) It should be borne in mind that, despite the claims. A and B, and partly foty landscape is a tribute to obscurantism.But I think it is a tribute useful as well as useful not only to learn how to articles, but also a popular blog. For a site of portal type.

About Plantarium and plants


If Plantarium giknetsya, then giknetsya. Links to descriptions / foty plants (which, incidentally, will be affixed and ubiratsya automatically) - only the extra service.The main thing that was a clear listing of plants in Latin in a formalized form is not our website for as many butterflies, but not so for hundreds - two species of these plants were also photos.

About scientific articles


At this stage we do not claim that this level of materials published first here, then somewhere else. So while you can simply select the article in terms of publications in which the author has released it to our website.And by itself, the site publishes articles only with the consent of the author or the author himself (as fotorafii in the gallery). If suddenly be previously unpublished material, and then for them to assess the degree of scientific (which are more suitable for the "articles" or blog), I think, not be easy.

About service for curators of collections


With conjugation galleries is simple: for each instance you can put down the property at startup (or later): Do not allow the publication of the main gallery site, to allow the publication in the main gallery or automatically publish photos in the main gallery at the instance is on the site.
ZYNow there are only finish editing already downloaded copies LC, so I think, this week, at last, the service will be released in the people.

11.08.2014 8:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

God forbid, of course .... And suddenly Plantarium gaknetsya? Or address has changed him? Then all of these links will be useless and the browser would yell "Oh, 404" or something there? It was very similar to the known resources ...... It is also worth considering that not a lot of options then edit.

11.08.2014 7:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, this is not the friendship of peoples. It is as if I have suddenly started talking about beetles: you and the information is accurate, and photos larger, and accuracy of the above. That is why a reference to Plantarium - it is almost "automatically". A resource that ground under the plant. As they say, a sin not to use.And to us it makes life easier: no need another tree species, and do not need a gallery, etc.
And with the habitats, it turns out that it is bound to a particular instance of pictures, then naturally, the external resource can not be.
According to the location on the page type, apparently did not change. As the field of food plant - will remain.Just the name of the plant and will be referring to the Plantarium.
Peter! Now the turn of the "scientific" articles. What will be the extent of their scientific? And who will determine. It may emerge that question when will the blog and learn how to pop.
How are things with the manager of collections? ..It seems to have forgotten that part of the contract at the time: I do not remember the logic interfacing with the main gallery collector.

11.08.2014 6:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I, frankly, ladies and gentlemen, it is not clear why the landscapes (in entomoplane habitat is properly called) are welcome, but what about the food plants of which it is the habitat and is invited to refer to Plantarium? It's all right, "Friendship of Peoples" or something?Well, I probably do know something some food plants :) We can distinguish between apple from a pear? Or say that the bush, which is called Jasmine really chubushnik is called? Or Chamomile and Nivyannik two different plants? Or that the butterfly shown in photo # 32483 sitting on knautia?And a lot "or" :) I want just to all infa contained, so to speak "in a single field" :)

11.08.2014 2:42, Peter Khramov:

Why no... No pattern features here to look out... While eyes could be sharper. Yet not necessary.

10.08.2014 23:58, Peter Khramov:

In order not to slide in particular, and to discuss the concept of it, I suggest this: anything that requires separate from Lepidoptera dereveev taxa sent to individual projects / articles etc. and can not be hung in the main gallery. Basically only butterflies in all stages and genitals to determine.Plus landscapes - not in the main gallery, but also in the gallery section, and not a separate project.

10.08.2014 23:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Shamil, my experience is almost the same, Where some three years. In principle, I agree with your suggestions. The main thing to start. Parasites of lepidopteran must be known. Maybe something new will come out of them.

10.08.2014 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I visited the male, in the scope of the previously exposed to the female of my city :)
True polёtan few, but the scoop we have little that is quite rare, and even in her neobtrёpannom able to collect rare: very rapid and active flyer. Put it on the raspravilku later be straightened.

10.08.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

10.08.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

10.08.2014 22:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Lacanobia suasa?
In the course of runaway gusyanka =)
(http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25023)

10.08.2014 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The inaccurate let standing before the final verdict.

10.08.2014 22:15, Shamil Murtazin:

some figure in her faded, but straight from the tin like ...
what do you say to the definition? ..)

10.08.2014 22:09, Shamil Murtazin:

This is Boloria selene looking at the white spot on the hindwing front edge. Elena, would be better to crop little bit more =)

10.08.2014 22:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Hera lays out a bear - it worked.

10.08.2014 21:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This nominative subspecies: Delias belladonna belladonna (Fabricius, 1793)
Full list subspecies to add the missing page of the form:
Delias belladonna horsfieldii Gray, 1831
Delias belladonna chrysorrhoea Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1865
Delias belladonna ithiela Butler, 1869
Delias belladonna zelima Mitis, 1893
Delias belladonna lugens Jordan, 1925
Delias belladonna hedybia Jordan, 1925
Delias belladonna burmana Evans, 1926
The forms of this subspecies:
f.hearseyi Butler, 1895
f.surya Mitis, 1893
Delias belladonna kwangtungensis Talbot, 1928
It has the form:
f.pekiangensis Mell, 1943
Delias belladonna malayana Pendlebury, 1933
Delias belladonna yukaae Nakano, 1993
Delias belladonna dempoensis Yagishita, 1993
Delias belladonna endoi Yagishita, 1993
Taken from here: http: //www.delias-butterflies.com / groups / species-groups / group-xiv-belladonna-group / delias-belladonna /
Source good for the group, and you can use it.
Peter, add himself or give me the form and I'll do it (the source added to the database).

10.08.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Delias belladonna / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.08.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Delias belladonna / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.08.2014 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe ferrugata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.08.2014 19:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, my experience is not very revealing, since I litters were only two extreme seasons. And three seasons ago, I did a butterfly knew almost nothing)))
And I was about a third broods of parasites. I think, because he took mainly in the fall and in the campaigns on the route.And there seems to affect behavior change gusyanki when infected with parasites - they roam the open roads and creep etc. Total bred butterflies no more than 15-20 ... about 5 respectively had parasites. Photographed only the two extremes, so all around.As parasites, as I think, it is necessary to do so:
It is a separate project with a mini tree taxa in that context, that it has only those species that are illustrated. And, accordingly, all older tribe.
And in the description of Lepidoptera species in a separate field "parasites / parasitoids" indicates a link to a page in the project parasites.There are already pictures adult, cocoon, etc.
Photo increasingly infected gusyanki, IMHO, should be in the Lepidoptera.
The draft parasites photo gusyanki can only be published with the cocoons of parasites.
Something like this. Fittingly? ..

10.08.2014 14:45, Peter Khramov:

In the text as the Old stamped without problems. If ph bit - in a separate review article. M?

10.08.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, at-a-boo in the sense that a lot of parazitrv are purely his master (certain types of parasites developed by individual species of butterflies). INFA never hurts so. A picture will be a bit, I'm sure :)

10.08.2014 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Mmm. In a separate project, I understand, yes. Maybe the person special interest parasites butterflies. Why no. Or, for example, in a separate article / articles. But the mold is in the middle of the main content - do not understand the meaning. Explain why?

10.08.2014 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.08.2014 12:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Everything that has to do with butterflies -Must have zdes.Prichem infa must be produced only with his own, and not taken from an Internet.
Shamil, say, here you have a lot of pictures, when, instead of butterflies born parasite? I have one somewhere. I do not think the pictures will be a lot of parasites. Yes, and place on a site they will not take a lot.For each type of butterfly is enough for all the regions where it lives 2-3 images of the parasite.

10.08.2014 11:36, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, Yuri! It seems that many copies of the puzzle is not necessary. There are also "projects" - and there is realized.
The main objective is described as close to the actual creation at the moment of the tree taxa of Lepidoptera, including a picture and description of species.
From myself still add that, apparently, Peter thinks about formalizing the maximum data.That is: any information necessary to lay out a kind of a sign for each species.It's easier to find later on various grounds, will make it possible to create some function or "project" that we have not yet thought / did not dare to think =)
In this section the addition of foreign tree taxa, whether or tahini riders - too much fragmentation of efforts.Again, this does not negate the possibility of the creation thereof in the "Projects" and then bundles the main site ... (again confusion, but maybe someone will understand =) So far, yes, parasitoids generally not taken into account.In plants, it seems, have the opportunity to bundle with Plantarium now - to make links from the pages where there are indications of species of plants in Latin. The only thing is to communicate with the admins Plantarium on cooperation to settle the request format)

10.08.2014 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More developed from publicly available sources
1) tahini: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Тахины
2) Riders: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Настоящие_наездники
Yuri, the site is oriented not only to the Palearctic :)

10.08.2014 6:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.08.2014 6:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.08.2014 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.08.2014 6:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.08.2014 6:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.08.2014 5:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Tahini Palearktike- in more than 1,600 species. Of those registered in Russia about 700 species, not so much.
CK-to riders in Russia -infy not found.

10.08.2014 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"The package" to the existing online male :)
Sadly .....
I always flight of these moths associated with the onset of autumn close .....
And there to "white flies" near (

10.08.2014 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia ligea / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.08.2014 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I undertook to define and prone to ligee Still, not until Ethiopian :) Put in inaccurate because of the specificity of geography.

10.08.2014 4:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well parasites Yuri quite a lot and most of them belong to either the flies, tahini, or to Wasps (Hymenoptera) and they are all definable as desired. And on molbiole have good special on these groups of insects. Here the problems with bringing to type should be minimum.

10.08.2014 1:58, Yuri Semejkin:

As part of the plant, -soglasen Peter. There is no need to duplicate here what is in the Plantarium. Suffice it to list the plant in Latin, in the section "Adding a form"
As parasites. In some cases, if not most probably they will be identified only to genus.And yet they are needed and should be attached to the adults of butterflies or a larva or pupa. Ie it must be shown that the parasite is related to butterflies. Somewhere here Basil has great picture proves it. And all the other images of insects, so to speak from the lantern, is simply not considered.I think the pictures of parasites in conjunction with a butterfly, a lot does not reach. Until something like that, and then we'll see.

09.08.2014 21:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

in the third week, another week to chat and take part in discussions with the phone difficult to write much, and companies are no longer in sight :)))

09.08.2014 21:39, Peter Khramov:

Let's not forget that we, fortunately, there are no restrictions imposed forumnym engine. Therefore, we need not make out anything and everything in the form of "order". Regarding attributive signs, then:
At this stage, we write this info in the section "Adding information on the form." At this stage, no one must study the issue of illustrations of all this business.Indeed, it may be interesting. But first - you need just a list of look-alike species. After all, if there is Illustration infa, how they differ, it is almost the same as that foty, fastened into one.
Gallery habitats will. Gallery plant - I think that is not necessary.It is much more necessary formalization signs of fodder plants in Latin. Then it will be possible to make the selection of plants, and synchronize the website with Plantarium - if someone has a desire to see the pictures and read descriptions of the plants. A separate gallery - it means a separate system of plant taxa. But this is no longer cool.As parasites - I do not know. Is it necessary? I suppose that is sufficient to indicate in the description of the type that here are some had parasites.
Reports on trips, etc. - It all fits perfectly to the format of the blog. Just open it to make new articles zaregalsya all users, and a few more features to add.All of this is my personal opinion, everyone obsuzhdaemo. I ask the people to speak.

09.08.2014 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it is necessary to Svyatoslav expressed my opinion on this matter :)

09.08.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Somehow I leanedEucosma cana, but there really is "dark forest" ...
Alexander, the right choice for you :)

09.08.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Once I started on the topic molbiole: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=507513
And there is a desire to have here. His basting have to continue and I think they are people too.
I believe that it is necessary and indeed the site should be expanded in terms of the galleries' habitats and food plants "; "Parasites live off of butterflies"; "Reports about the trips", etc.The site should do more informative: surely every one of us has some of his observations, which I want to share :)

09.08.2014 20:57, Shamil Murtazin:

I think, this is Plebejus idas

09.08.2014 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the really important thing. Forgot point. Photos, taxa, collectible items and other elements of the site will be tied to the points on the map and continue to make the selection for them.

09.08.2014 20:13, Shamil Murtazin:

where here (in concept) rises map with points of catching butterflies? ..

09.08.2014 20:13, Peter Khramov:

How to arrive at the final structure and draw a. Right now, look what the people had to say.

09.08.2014 20:03, Shamil Murtazin:

excellent. a tree is currently somewhere Draw or lose.

09.08.2014 9:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It was checked up at the alternate web-site and it's fool-proof identification now.

09.08.2014 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.08.2014 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.08.2014 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mesapamea secalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mesoligia furuncula / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.08.2014 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mesapamea secalis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mesoligia furuncula / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.08.2014 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Erebia aethiops or Erebia ligea (more like E. aethiops). Please, confirm...

09.08.2014 1:16, Peter Khramov:

By the way, here is one more explanation about admin / moderators / professionals. For the specialist is very good quality is perfectionism. Suppose he does not notice anything around, but in his area of ​​responsibility he is always clean and tidy. Admin - the complete opposite.He cares about everything, but it is the nature of his problems can not be a perfectionist, he always has to find a compromise between the various judgments and opinions. Including when the only correct answer does not exist. Moderator - between them.The functions at Modera and spices are all from different spheres, but still a vivid example with the addition of taxa:
The task of the administrator or moderator of a high level - make the database of 50,000 species, catching at the same time a maximum of synonyms, generic combinations and other crossings, as well as the adequacy of the classification.Due to the large amounts of data in this paper can be tolerated, for example, 200, mistakes.
Modders task - to find 170 of obvious errors, which, however, were not quite apparent to the administrator. As well as adding new taxa, but not thousands, at most tens.
The task of the expert - that in "his" taxon has not been a single mistake.And add your own or dopinat admin / modders have been added to all new taxa that are included in its area of ​​responsibility.
I think something like this.

09.08.2014 0:51, Peter Khramov:

For those who wondered why the definition of the author Vasily and Irina are not - explained below. Basil, and I'll answer your question on the phone tomorrow. As for the FAQ and etc. descriptions and rules - the remark is correct, we will implement.

08.08.2014 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Shamil on concepts - was just about to close up the topic, your post served as the last straw: -) So, see page http://lepidoptera.ru/community/27814. There's also about "projects".
6,7 and 9 differ from 10, in that they are highly specialized. Iepeople employed, for example, some one takosnom site may be purple (within reason, of course), to many other projects / taxa site. A moderator should still keep some integrity picture state of things on the site in your head and, if necessary, to resolve disputes with professionals.Essno, it's true, when all these points are not half a person: -)
Group 3 get people who do not care, but they do not have time / opportunity to wider functions. Many discussions in the good must begin not on the public, and in a closed group.That's what is needed, and this structure (the group most likely to enroll, you can machine many comrades from Nos. 4 and above).
4 and 5 differ from each other as well as materials from the "Articles" section on the website and in the section "Blog".

08.08.2014 23:41, Peter Khramov:

There is a suspicion that it is necessary to close up the page / section "About", which clearly articulate who we are, what our goals and objectives, what priorities in the work site, who is who on the site and to whom on what issues can be addressed directly and stuff like that.Bo sometimes new people is not entirely clear, sometimes even among experienced users, questions arise about the priorities, but someone may seem that the site is too poppy, and to communicate with him, he will not. In addition, we have the international version in English, with the understanding there can be even harder.And then there's Shamil next topic the issue raised. In general, it's time.
In this topic, I sketched an initial draft on the above issues, I propose here to discuss it. Mneiiya and additions are welcome. And the lack of it - is not: -)
So, in general terms, Lepidoptera.ru/Lepidoptera.pro - a place of concentration of data on Lepidoptera.His foundation - the tree taxa, starting from the squad and finishing subspecies. On a tree superimposed other data (eg, photos / illustrations), and everything is polished users the ability to communicate through the website comments.Our main task - to collect the largest possible amount of information on various topics of the site and an increasing number of people keen on this topic, and our main goal - knowledge of the subject (Lepidoptera).

Site


The tree taxa (classification).Specific illustrations and sketches with the obligatory indication of the sources of information.
Descriptions supraspecific taxa and subspecies.
Search engine tasonov with autosubstitution.
Product types with a search on formalized criteria.For example, search for all moths Vietnam (or 5 in the region of the Russian Federation), flying in May (or June) with a length of front wing more than 10 mm.
Gallery subsections - basic (butterflies in all stages of development as well as to determine the species of the genitals) plu extra for landscapes and blog.Project - users of the site that can not be realized under other sections. For example, "The determinant of the day butterflies Primorye."
Collections - service to conduct collections of Lepidoptera and the exchange of information about them to other users, as well as proposals for the sale and exchange of copies.Article - "scientific" (as opposed to blog) Related Articles Lepidoptera.
Blog - "non-scientific" articles.
And Section Authors, Literature and the Community with the relevant content.

Now, a little religion.
We are trying to combine the online scientific accuracy with an attractive resource for mere mortals.It is almost an impossible task, for example, in the framework of the print edition, but the site I think it is possible. Just because a site is not to be certain on how to complete these bricks with one level of the feed in good site - it's a piece of clay that everyone can crush under his requirements.Typical conflict between physicists and poets - some Fautua hanging as the main illustration - straightened a copy or snapshot "nature"? The answer - you need to for each conclusion the option that it is currently most needed.
Still need some default options, as well as publicly announced by landmarks.I believe that these guidelines should be to the side of science, and not in the direction of pop music. But this does not mean that we have to be snobs (which, in Russia, unfortunately, not uncommon) and deter users who simply opredeleit another caterpillar from the garden.Photos of butterflies - a very important part of this information, bearing, besides, also an aesthetic burden, and closeup - important people in our community.Nevertheless, we believe that at this stage of human development goal of our website can not be achieved without the collection and examination of material, so this is the fee we encourage educational purposes, and the legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of view is largely delusional.We understand that the collection or nesbor material - matter of preferences and beliefs of man, not a measure of its (non) goodness. For example, I myself am not collect material and collections do not keep, but not because of religious fanaticism, but because of the fact that I do not like to collect (when I have time, I'd rather pofotografiruyu) and maintain the collection once.As for the Conservation of Nature, let us already agree: the strategy of survival of vertebrates and invertebrates are very different, respectively, and have different methods of protection of both, so if someone suddenly decided that they should be protected.What works on the Amur tiger, will not work on butterflies, which umenshenieili increase the number of individuals per hundred copies in the wild do not play any role in the chances of survival of the form.On the other hand, a stupid habit of catching anything and everything without any need, as well as a dull habit crap everywhere, and then another, and did not clean up after themselves - both individually and on a commercial scale - that is, yes, here it is support can not be correct.
We finished with the religious part.Another part, which we often forget - the English version. At the moment, her attendance is not much less Russian, and the concentration of visits on target highly specific demands even more. However, active participants, foreigners have not so much.There are several reasons, but the main thing - is that the English version is lagging behind in functionality and the amount of information due to problems with the translation. One of the priorities - resolution of this issue, and full synchronization of the two versions of the site.

Summary. To strive for.To the site with a comprehensive tree taxa of Lepidoptera of the world, with more graphics and textual version information for each taxon, with an active, knowledgeable and pleasant in communication with the community and the development of additional services and thematic projects. All this in the international format.

We discuss who thinks what.And most importantly, I think whether it is someone something about it.

08.08.2014 22:44, Shamil Murtazin:

OK! .. need somewhere to store the logic of behavior in similar situations of question ... I think somewhere it is written =)
FAQ or something.

08.08.2014 22:42, Shamil Murtazin:

I will begin with a lengthy entry "by itself":
Such questions - rather difficult to discuss and study (just automatically =)
All of these items are directly dependent on how and what will be presented on the site. In a sense, this is another rethinking of the entire contents.Again, based on its modest experience, I note that I am more comfortable initial formulation of the problem, and only then dancing to the organization infrastructure.
However, I do not fully known plans and probably Sci associated with the "ideal" content of the resource.That is why escapes me the idea called "projects", respectively, and n. 9 of the list for me is not absolutely clear ...
Further, specifically on the questions posed:
Claim 3 - who fall into this group? .. formal claim 2 is ever to join the discussion on this resource. However, "closed the admin discussion" that, IMHO, is not enough.
n.4,5 - than these two points differ? .. Ie Claim 4 - is a blog-writers, and claim 5 - authors of popular scientific articles?
p.6,7,9 and 10 - different kinds of moderators, divided by type of liability.
claim 9 - interesting to hear what a "project" ...Plus I want to know in what direction floats resource - whether it's still gallery of photos or a photo-determinant, or something similar to zabugornye websites statistics fishing, etc.

08.08.2014 18:33, Peter Khramov:

Please users who have access to internal thread, read and comment on it here: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/27790 and now this: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/27814.

08.08.2014 18:32, Peter Khramov:

There have been questions about why the author of determination was made Basil, not Irina. Since initiative that decision came from me, explain the algorithm:

User A: I think it's kind of X, but I doubt it.
User B: I confirm this view H.
Define a user A.

User A: Here is the genus, species do not know, but I think that either X or Y.User B: Yes, this kind, and views of H.
Define a user B. For it was he who gave preference to a particular type, not the user A.

Ok?

08.08.2014 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here are thank you for it (I confess, myself on the phone today and did not look all comments). Tomorrow I checked: I once again have a good 8 infa.

08.08.2014 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear.

08.08.2014 18:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

What are the reasons? If this is not the definition, but guessing. Another race, another tribe. I brought under one photo it is necessary, or at all? They're eaten, why write it under each?

08.08.2014 18:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notocelia roborana Notocelia cynosbatella.

08.08.2014 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reasons?

08.08.2014 17:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ancylis apicella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

08.08.2014 17:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ancylis apicella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

08.08.2014 17:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ancylis apicella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

08.08.2014 17:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's right, this moth, and even the subfamily Olethreutinae, but the tribe is another Eucosmini, but the view and I do not say can Eucosma hohenwartiana, rather Eucosma cana. there in the Kaluga region more common.

08.08.2014 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Citizens! I think it's time to close up a coherent structure of users on the site and invite her to take part in new people. For the sake of greater development of the site. The structure is: I can clearly see the following groups of users:

1. Non-registered - can look but can not touch the hands. Like now.
2.At least - can not only watch, but also to load data to the species and other taxa indicating the sources to ship your photos and comments to all and sundry. Too much like now (just another form of the addition of information on the taxa above species level is necessary to implement).
3. The Working Party.Registered users who do not have the time or desire to perform moderator / curator function, but can actively discuss administrative matters as it is better to realize things like that. Iealways have a qualified opinion and are part of the discussions covered the admin and the core debates open to all.
4. The active writers. Engaged in the completion of the blog based on its data and external sources. Look after the articles are written in a blog registered users.
5. The authors of the articles.Actually, everything stated in the title. Only their is virtually none.
6. Technical curators photos - edit photos on the site to the gallery was less technically weak pictures.
7. Hosts taxa - individual groups of taxa (those which dealt with).Monitor the adequacy of the classification and species information in essays and descriptions supraspecific taxa, including decide what pictures to illustrate those or other descriptions in "their" taxon.
8. Formalizatory signs. Formalizes the signs on the basis of the essays in the species (in conjunction with kurtorami taxa).Remember, formalized format allows you to select types of signs on them (for example, to find all types with a length of more than 4 and the wing is less than 5 cm).
9. The curator of the project - author and host of individual projects on the site. This option provides, but there is almost no working examples.
10. Moderators - keep order on the site as a whole.Transfer the photos from the data users and curators to the kinds of help in the work of all other groups.
11. Interpreters. We have Russian and English version. A lot of information for transfer in both directions, and auto / machine translation does not seem to yield.
12. Administrator - watching everything as much as possible involved in everything.Engaged in the technical part (at least until the site has no separate technical group on programming and so on. N.)

It goes, one person can belong to several groups.And by itself, representatives of the different groups actively kicking each other for more activities: -)

I propose here to discuss the draft of the proposed structure of users on the site.In addition, I propose here to raise their hands who wants to participate in the work site at the level of some of the user groups, and not just in zaregalsya, but is not involved. And I suggest popokazyvat finger at those who would you like to see in this or that group.The current list of users with extended rights: Constantine Efetov Alexander Zhakov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov Stanislav Korb, Irina Nikulin, Dmitry Pozhogin Vasily Feoktistov, Petr Khramov . All of these can add new taxa, as well as have access to the service topic. Besides that:
Constantine Efetov - curator of Zygaenidae .Alexander Zhakov - curator of Coleophoridae , as well as the European Tortricoidea , Noctuoidea , Pyraloidea , plus transfer photos to the species.
Svyatoslav Knyazev - curator of Hepialidae , and Noctuoidea , Pyraloidea , Tortricoidea North Asia.
Stanislav Korb - curator of Rhopalocera Palearctic.Irina Nikulin - illustrating species and taxa supraspecific (assigns photos as illustrations and sketches for the species pages with descriptions of other taxa) plus opening / closing debate.
Dmitry Pozhogin - transfer pictures to the species.Vasiliy Feoktistov - transfer pictures to the species, the change of angle and signs copies at the image transfer pictures to a group of images on them the same individuals, the formalization of signs.
Petr Khramov - all right.

08.08.2014 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The most common, and in good years, the mass of the genus Catocala in my city. Although C. nupta here enough and I decided to contribute :)

08.08.2014 0:44, Peter Khramov:

Shamil yesterday / day before yesterday I fixed the floor thing. Check whether all OK.

07.08.2014 22:00, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. Who is not going to understand. I leave for a week, rest. Then after the 18th of August. By the way, the package also prepared after August 18.

07.08.2014 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's apicella I bet. It has seen better days though. Moved to tentatively identified.

07.08.2014 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ancylis apicella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ancylis apicella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ancylis apicella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

07.08.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

07.08.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's right, and it is good that there is a discussion cleaned, this sailboat. There's just comments "zero" was (and this is clearly intentionally) Ozhegova only by his enraged ..... :)

07.08.2014 20:44, Peter Khramov:

In fact, have not seen a single case, that person specifically wrote anonymously. Yes, and it is quite difficult to do something. But you're right, this is wrong, that such cases are generally technically allowed. Now I fixed, by any chance even such cases are - reported (request to all).

07.08.2014 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I think that there should be opportunities for people to leave anonymous comments: None. Anonymity, I find vile in nature.Do not appear comments on the number "0" Reminds molbiol when there is a person wants to write something such he asks out of Aka and writes what he wants under the name "Guest" is necessary here that "Krysyatnik" (otherwise you will not be called) should be deleted. There is a possibility?

07.08.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course, but it is easier to determine Case consists of (they have every kind of your own).

07.08.2014 18:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Last find quite interesting eggs
Mom - some regular Saradrina sp. (my region and much of the southern boundary of the interventionists)
It is a single frame.


And posobirat for stacks of field:


07.08.2014 18:01, Shamil Murtazin:

And ideally to opredelitelstva that they also cook? ..

07.08.2014 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Spilosoma lutea.

07.08.2014 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While Let pobudet inaccurate.

07.08.2014 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 16:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Finish writing

07.08.2014 15:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But there is unlikely imago-whether something will give. A recent example, when the download Case consists helped clarify siuatsiyu: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30968 They are in most cases and Case consists determined.

07.08.2014 15:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Let's wait a butterfly, if possible.

07.08.2014 13:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gelechia rhombelliformis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 13:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gelechia rhombelliformis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 13:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not N. roborana IMHO. I don't know what is it though.

07.08.2014 13:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Notocelia roborana / Vitaly Gumenuk Notocelia rosaecolana / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

07.08.2014 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

07.08.2014 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

07.08.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Photography was quite "restraint" to transport inaccurate.

07.08.2014 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nematopogon metaxella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 12:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I supposeCanephora hirsuta?
In MO very common look and there it is in almost all regions, including 40.

07.08.2014 11:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Semeysvo Psychidae

07.08.2014 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia innotata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

07.08.2014 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia innotata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

07.08.2014 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you :) And it all from the balcony.

07.08.2014 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia innotata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

07.08.2014 10:48, Basil Sergienko:

innotata

07.08.2014 9:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you. But this look is possible: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32305? Not it-whether it, too?

07.08.2014 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis porphyrana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis porphyrana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudemis porphyrana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.08.2014 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia tripunctaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov Eupithecia virgaureata / Basil Sergienko.

07.08.2014 9:22, Basil Sergienko:

In my opinion, it virgaureata

07.08.2014 1:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Naryl :)
Along the way, another kind of "illustrated" by the transfer: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/10717

07.08.2014 1:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notocelia roborana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 1:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notocelia roborana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 1:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Notocelia roborana / Vitaly Gumenuk Notocelia rosaecolana / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 1:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Notocelia roborana / Vitaly Gumenuk Notocelia rosaecolana / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 1:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

07.08.2014 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

07.08.2014 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK :)

07.08.2014 0:19, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erynnis tages / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

07.08.2014 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Linked to the new version of PHP. Not parsya, right now all fixed.

07.08.2014 0:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good. And what kind of a glitch?

07.08.2014 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"I Loved the" I of the moths of the season. But I put in inaccurate and ask to check.
This baby already raspravilke :)

06.08.2014 23:51, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Scopula immorata.

06.08.2014 23:50, Peter Khramov:

Basil, let the admin of affairs only in the admin area, okay? Ie this is Well, now the transfer is not working .... It is seen after yesterday's glitch tails ......
Peter, it is impossible to move the standard method. He writes: "Error loading comments or data has not changed."
on the public to anything. And this: In moderation it. The transfer does not work for me.Identify the problem: waiting ........ is quite normal for the Public to the people understood why there is no transfer. Agree?

06.08.2014 23:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Papilio desmondi.

06.08.2014 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In moderation it. The transfer does not work for me. Identify the problem: waiting ........

06.08.2014 23:11, Shamil Murtazin:

and here...

06.08.2014 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, if you did not get them replaced, call me, understand, what it was.

06.08.2014 23:10, Shamil Murtazin:

here somehow not defined ...

06.08.2014 23:09, Shamil Murtazin:

ie Photos in the second case and appears uncertain, but a long string with Russian names in the properties of the photo in the view of spelled.

06.08.2014 23:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Not a bug, but the logic of the change.
When editing captions to photos. When signing in the field of the form.
Previously, he wrote of the species name, get out auto search - click on the desired row - the longest such string is inserted with the Latin and Russian names. Then he pressed the button "Apply" and photo appeared in a certain way.Now is not working.
Ie long line with Russian names to be determined.
It works correctly only Latin designation of the species, the two words. I tried a couple of pictures - more did not.

06.08.2014 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.08.2014 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.08.2014 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.08.2014 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.08.2014 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, not only for all similar, and in general for ALL straightened. Recently, I try to do so: this can be useful if you use the site as a determinant :)
It should also gather strength, and to report missing ... Now the season is simple and spread svezhachok, and the case for winter :)

06.08.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here on this fote: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32421
It lies in the admin, and there is not tolerated, and when I try to transfer staff means, what happens is that I wrote in a previous post.

06.08.2014 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter came up after him (the transfer is not working: all drive in as expected, but writes: "Error loading comments or data has not changed." Looks after glitches yesterday .....

06.08.2014 21:25, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, perhaps the underside have to spread to all similar butterflies. Later, look through LC, quietly lay out the missing

06.08.2014 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, now the transfer is not working .... It is seen after yesterday's glitch tails ......
Peter, it is impossible to move the standard method. He writes: " Error loading commentary or data has not changed." Deal :)

06.08.2014 20:54, Alex Dumchus:

Yes sir!

06.08.2014 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Putting inPapilio desmondi?

06.08.2014 20:50, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. It desmondi. From bromiusa distinguishes it, what on underside pered.krylev streaks. besides completely different of color blue. In bromiusa it greener. I are almost all blue -Black sailboats Africa. ry like this, and Now, there cherpkowskii and nireus

06.08.2014 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So bromius same :)

06.08.2014 19:20, Alex Dumchus:

instead of 21029

06.08.2014 19:08, Alex Dumchus:

instead of 21038

06.08.2014 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This, too, can be accurate in my opinion?

06.08.2014 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

06.08.2014 10:31, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

06.08.2014 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Butterfly from the same place that a few days earlier loaded Abrostola tripartita (Hufnagel, 1766) : http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32223 These two species usually we fly at the same time and the photographs can be clearly seen how they are visually different.

06.08.2014 7:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate for hedging. Later it will be unfolding: it can clarify the situation.

06.08.2014 7:17, Shamil Murtazin:

pretty caterpillar =)

06.08.2014 1:49, Peter Khramov:

Comments that are loaded in this interval. All new comments - with Moscow.

06.08.2014 1:48, Peter Khramov:

Oh, and some comments will be marked by the German time and not Moscow.

06.08.2014 1:09, Peter Khramov:

Evening of August 5, 2014 in connection with the updating of the software on a server that users can download to face the inability of their photos and see a couple of pictures in the gallery left that have been downloaded to the test administrator. Now we complete all / fixed, no glitches, new pictures can be easily downloaded.

06.08.2014 1:07, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, corrected.

06.08.2014 1:07, Peter Khramov:

To undergo treatment.

05.08.2014 22:16, Igor Sakhno:

Perhaps, then - less can be removed.

05.08.2014 22:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula ignobilis ?

05.08.2014 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Gluck see the reason for looking.

05.08.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have the same thing on Opera: "500 Internal Server Error" writes (he wanted to load ......

05.08.2014 21:08, Shamil Murtazin:

and what pictures do not want to ship? .. ngix swears ...

05.08.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, when you try to download photos have me Opera writes "500 Internal Server Error" strange somehow ... I can not gruzanut nothing.

05.08.2014 16:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok, then we'll wait when Vladimir or somebody else upload new photos from this spot. But any boundary is just line on the map and not a border for the (in)organic nature.

05.08.2014 16:03, Peter Khramov:

Yes. Genereally. But Sinev's regions are not administrative districts but zoogeographical ones. I don't mean the Sinev's info is final and conclusive but we have to work up some criteria for the formalized and general data about species.

05.08.2014 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

7th and 8th regions are neighbors and the insect as you know don't recognize any human boundaries. For example, one of the Klyazma river banks is situated in the Moscow region while other is in the Vladimir region (they both are included in 8th Sinev's region though). This river is just 60 meters wide and its banks have similar environmental conditions and, so, similar insects species. We may add the info :)

05.08.2014 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ugu

05.08.2014 15:44, Peter Khramov:

The word author.

05.08.2014 15:43, Peter Khramov:

But can we add formalized data because of just one photo? I mean we may public info about this discovery, but formalize it for the selecting species in the catalog? What is the criteria for such a move?

05.08.2014 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

05.08.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We have to add new info for the Sinev's species distribution, I guess. This species can't be confused with anything else (in my region anyway).

05.08.2014 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pretending.

05.08.2014 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Svetlana, I've got it :) It's OK.
My wingspan data was not about correction at all, it's just for the site users' information. We measure wingspan for adequately mounted lepidopterans only (bottom line of the forewing is vertical to the body line).

05.08.2014 14:41, Svetlana Shchavelina:

I'm sorry :-) I meant not wingspan as it generally accepted (it is bigger, of course) but wingspan at this particular position.

05.08.2014 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Celypha flavipalpana ?

05.08.2014 13:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cochylis hybridella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.08.2014 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cochylis hybridella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.08.2014 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cochylis hybridella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.08.2014 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

FYI :)
Seams like it is the only species of this genus in Russia (Синев, 2008). Wingspan 16-24 mm (Russian eighth region).

05.08.2014 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cataclysta lemnata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.08.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmorhoe ocellata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.08.2014 12:16, Basil Sergienko:

Cosmorhoe ocellata

05.08.2014 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Isophrictis striatella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.08.2014 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Isophrictis striatella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.08.2014 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Basically: I do not care. It's just photos uploaded later and found him so the double

05.08.2014 7:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I think this is due to the time period in the picture and erased after pouring an hour about ...

05.08.2014 3:18, Peter Khramov:

Gluck with quotation marks in geography undergo treatment (in moderskom interface that was). Now, not cuts.

05.08.2014 3:06, Peter Khramov:

I do not see at close range, why is this happening ...

05.08.2014 1:17, Peter Khramov:

There are some reasons to leave the string exactly this and delete that, and not vice versa?

04.08.2014 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Triodia sylvina / Confidently identified / Female / Svetlana Shchavelina.

04.08.2014 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.08.2014 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

32356 double photo, which I recently endured: a size easy. Do not need to ship doubles if the site has a moderator, who in the case of user error when loading it fixed :)

04.08.2014 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immorata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.08.2014 12:26, Basil Sergienko:

And you do not suffer, it is likely fimbriata, and that, judging by the presence of white, then we all tirreniki near Kiev. Also clever book says that vnutennyaya black border on the hind wings tirenniki more oblique, but not concave. Look for example tirreniku exposed Barko section Noctuidae, Noctuinae

04.08.2014 12:10, Basil Sergienko:

Scopula immorata

04.08.2014 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why, though, there is a female: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/16209 (it is removed from the Case consists since there remains after the birth: it fly without the need). Actually, it is difficult to find in nature imago. I know for myself :) Never seen ... But Case consists indefinitely. Who is he trying to bring this kind: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/10163 two geese live at home. Prada not know-you will get .....

04.08.2014 3:16, Shamil Murtazin:

and what it is not fotkali in nature and did not catch? .. Case consists one :))

04.08.2014 3:07, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, from the English all comments will sooner or later be transferred since them now and because there are few En → Ru easier than vice versa. Therefore, it is possible to watch them and Lepidoptera.ru. An example from the recent: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30701.
ZY Walked machine by the comments, it managed to quickly copy of the order of 500 comments that do not contain Cyrillic, with the Russian version of the site into English.
ZzyWell, if you still want to see the English version, you can just poke the English link at the top right of any page, and so go to the same page of the English version. Or change the address of any page on the .ru .pro.

03.08.2014 21:18, Andrei Komrakov:

Yeah, thank you all understand! ..)

03.08.2014 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina is a terrible thing called "genitals" :). It is for him a considerable number of gelehid and determined. "By habitus", alas: only a few far as I know, alas (

03.08.2014 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Soria, to Andrew, of course the previous message that something confused me :)

03.08.2014 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, of course freshly (see. Date), and about the fast drying, there are certain achievements :) So it is possible to spread and mattress under two conditions:
1) Zamarivalas ethyl acetate or nail polish remover nail it contains ("Weasel", etc.) and nothing else.
2) Well then soak in a desiccator (humidity chamber).

03.08.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.08.2014 19:14, Alex Dumchus:

Alexander, well, what I do with it all? Where to check and publish? I know of only one entomolog- Boris Stradomsky, but he is more of copper-butterfly.

03.08.2014 16:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks, Vasiliy

03.08.2014 14:58, Andrei Komrakov:

And spread their freshly caught? I once tried to crack down on such small mattress - only spoiled ..)

03.08.2014 14:28, Irina Nikulina:

Isophrictis striatella?

03.08.2014 14:23, Irina Nikulina:

While not), and no time to understand, then to be postponed, but with this "terrible thing" - interesting)

03.08.2014 13:58, Alex Dumchus:

Taenaris sp...

03.08.2014 13:56, Alex Dumchus:

Taenaris sp...

03.08.2014 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pandemis heparana, I suppose?

03.08.2014 13:23, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps someone from Oxyptilus? Oxyptilus pilosellaeandOxyptilus chrysodactyla? Rhode Crombrugghia also considered) Crombrugghia laetus, for example. In general, however I looked at the typical hair, could not identify

03.08.2014 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gelechiidae: a terrible thing (
Irina, any idea there?

03.08.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right next to mine, straightened :)

03.08.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila selasella / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

03.08.2014 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila selasella / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

03.08.2014 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

03.08.2014 12:39, Andrei Komrakov:

Agriphila selasella (Hubner, 1813)

03.08.2014 12:38, Andrei Komrakov:

Agriphila selasella (Hubner, 1813)

03.08.2014 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So we have a female now. Yuri, congrats :)

03.08.2014 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.08.2014 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.08.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The overriding: it is never to keep a collection of the insects in the world. Burn them, and especially those suffering moths. Collection of insects should always be stored in a dry, dark and well-ventilated place.
Well, after raspravki butterflies always seem somewhat lost in the color.I attribute this to the fact that during the drying of the moisture evaporates insect, and it plays an important role in the manifestation of color saturation. Live Butterfly always looks brighter than Dried.

03.08.2014 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

03.08.2014 9:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

03.08.2014 9:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've moved it according to the author's comment.

03.08.2014 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

03.08.2014 8:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

New for me to straighten them, but in spite of this, and this beauty will soon take its place on the site in the expanded form :)

03.08.2014 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eupithecia sp. Further, a loss (Spread it and later attached.

03.08.2014 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma conterminana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.08.2014 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma conterminana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.08.2014 7:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Stand: http://www.lepidoptera.eu/show.php?ID=3056

02.08.2014 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is beautiful but small geometrid. I'll try and mount it.

02.08.2014 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

Eucosma conterminana?

02.08.2014 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vlad Proklov Alexandr Zhakov.

02.08.2014 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whew ... vrole everything. This is me kind prosherstit for correcting determined the names :)

02.08.2014 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 23:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.08.2014 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vlad Proklov Andrey Ponomarev.

02.08.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

02.08.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then, when the gallery will be parasites. And um, you see, and they define :)

02.08.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gelechia jakovlevi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.08.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gelechia jakovlevi / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilonota ocellana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilonota ocellana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gelechia rhombelliformis ?

02.08.2014 22:12, Shamil Murtazin:

Plus, Peter, if we answer the English-speaking, we it in his version will not see ... =)

02.08.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha rivulana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha rivulana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 22:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, and as valid for the English version to see? ..

02.08.2014 22:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Got photos of Tachinidae from this caterpillar. Share?

02.08.2014 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's more like Notocelia roborana. We'll wait for other opinions.

02.08.2014 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilonota ocellana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

02.08.2014 21:44, Irina Nikulina:

Spilonota ocellana?

02.08.2014 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well house and helped all "dotting the i's" right :)

02.08.2014 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Pupa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Pupa / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 21:32, Shamil Murtazin:

with a house, yes, it did not happen immediately)

02.08.2014 21:28, Irina Nikulina:

Notocelia cynosbatella ?

02.08.2014 20:32, Peter Khramov:

In full compliance logical to inspect not on the types and the absence of the Cyrillic alphabet in the comments. That yes, good idea.

02.08.2014 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Certainly the form :) This and guidance. Just here is a comment from Alexander 02.19.2014 21:31 so I decided here otkommentit to understand was what was happening :)

02.08.2014 20:20, Shamil Murtazin:

I agree. rear wings when raspravke very beautiful. sorry then they lose it all somehow.

02.08.2014 20:19, Shamil Murtazin:

he is just going with the spirit of cooking :)
and a person's profile says that he is working at the institute. it is entirely possible collection samples.

02.08.2014 20:18, Shamil Murtazin:

By the way, it is possible to carry out checks and has already left the commentary, for example, over the past year;)

02.08.2014 20:15, Shamil Murtazin:

offer from "momentary inspirations." You can check to make commentary on the match form. and if it coincides with some views of the site - Latin throwing machine in a foreign field.
For the above will try! )

02.08.2014 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Comment belongs to the species rather than fote ...

02.08.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, yes, it is. I stand.

02.08.2014 19:58, Irina Nikulina:

Xanthorhoe spadicearia ?

02.08.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.08.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:) How long have "plagued" My: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=362944&view=findpost&p=1233729 :) Therefore, "to avoid stepping on a rake" ..... From personal experience, so to speak.

02.08.2014 19:42, Irina Nikulina:

This issue has been discussed for a long time http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21279, so that there is no objection.

02.08.2014 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

AUT question, thanks to Irina. Product Sinev for 6 years from the date of publication had become outdated in some places.
I propose to move a photo here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/89496
Reason: VV Website Dubatolov, which is updated constantly: http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/images/Lemyra_jankowskii.htm
That same applies to the neighboring species Thyrgorina boghaika (Tshistjakov & Kishida, 1994): http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/images/Lemyra_boghaika.htm
We still have to check the validity of the genus Thyrgorina Walker, [1865], because here: http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/Arctiid.htm I had never found itself. Maybe, though, and it looked bad :)

02.08.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Their point of view explained in the comments to the photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32265
From this it is inaccurate.

02.08.2014 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Amelora fucosa Amphipoea fucosa.

02.08.2014 19:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amelora fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suitable, but only inaccurate: the species has a certain resemblance to theAmphipoea oculeaAnd both of them are variable and the issue here, as far as I know, "genital"

02.08.2014 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Citizens, ascentrally translate comments into English Now no one, and our foreign colleagues are deprived infoy (a ottogu and they have less reason to share its data), I ask those who spoke in English well, do not be lazy and post along with the comments and py-ene Translation (box below on the same page), and those who spoke in English bad,at least post the translation in cases where your comments short / easy to transfer (for example, just the name in Latin or a pair of interjections or something else like that).
In the future, we try to somehow thread poreshat problem with translations, and now here.

02.08.2014 19:05, Irina Nikulina:

Amphipoea fucosa ?

02.08.2014 19:04, Irina Nikulina:

Amphipoea fucosa ?

02.08.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, here sheSpilosoma luteafigures and Spilarctia lutea in her synonyms worth. We must will explain this issue.
Yuri, you have to add a subspecies of the form: Spilosoma lutea ssp. japonica (Rothschild, 1910) and then I think you can carry in inaccurate, "the place" :)

02.08.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.08.2014 18:33, Irina Nikulina:

And in my opinion, in theSpilarctia lutea(subspecies japonica in the southern Far East) is much like bodshe thanThyrgorina jankowskii/ (By the way, there are still 2 stranichki- and Thyrgorina jankowskii and Lemyra jankowskii, what Alexander had already written six months ago. It would be necessary, perhaps, to remind not to lose this remark)

02.08.2014 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Isn't it an Abrostola triplasia by any chance? As the photographer has claimed it.

02.08.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:)

02.08.2014 18:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura erminea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 18:08, Irina Nikulina:

It is, erminea.

02.08.2014 18:07, Yuri Semejkin:

I'll mount it.

02.08.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, confidently. The species is very distinctive one (see the link below).

02.08.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lemyra jankowskii / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 18:05, Peter Khramov:

Confidently or tentatively identified?

02.08.2014 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, it looks exactly like the speciman at the picture from szmn.sbras.ru. I move it to the L. jankowskii.

02.08.2014 17:51, Yuri Semejkin:

And this is an Lemyra jankowskii probably. I've found a picture of it in the web. So we may move it, I guess.

02.08.2014 17:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasiliy, I've shot only upperside. I don't know about the abdomen...

02.08.2014 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I doubt about it. I marked "tentatively identified" as yet.

02.08.2014 16:05, Peter Khramov:

Yeah. And the number of photos of the species in the web. Of which almost zero ...

02.08.2014 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one is certainly Lemyra jankowskii (see http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/images/Lemyra_jankowskii.htm)
But I'll wait other users' opinions before moving it.
And I challenge that that photo's http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32025 identification is not correct. Yuri, can't you say what was the abdomen's color?

02.08.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala nupta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala nupta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eulithis prunata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pelurga comitata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.08.2014 2:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 2:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

02.08.2014 1:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula rubiginata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 1:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eulithis prunata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 1:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea biselata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.08.2014 1:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Like the usual form, and in the expanded form as much new to learn :) Definitely: I liked to spread all this small things :)

02.08.2014 1:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Congratulations on a good view :)

02.08.2014 1:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

02.08.2014 1:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation.

02.08.2014 1:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

02.08.2014 0:55, Irina Nikulina:

Cochylis hybridella?

02.08.2014 0:04, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula rubiginata?

01.08.2014 23:46, Irina Nikulina:

Xestia baja?

01.08.2014 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Large female. Later it will be attached straightened.

01.08.2014 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

Amblyptilia punctidactyla?

01.08.2014 23:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.08.2014 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Later transferred. In order not correct then :)

01.08.2014 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.08.2014 23:33, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea biselata?

01.08.2014 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

Eulithis prunata?

01.08.2014 23:15, Shamil Murtazin:

Dichrorampha petiverella

01.08.2014 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, with these "rake" to do something absolutely nothing? Annoyingly, when each transfer have to recheck ....

01.08.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hoplodrina octogenaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cochylis dubitana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cochylis dubitana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Axylia putris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.08.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala nupta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala nupta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.08.2014 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips oporana / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips oporana / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put on a female.

01.08.2014 22:21, Irina Nikulina:

Catocala nupta?

01.08.2014 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.08.2014 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cochylis dubitana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cochylis dubitana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.08.2014 22:10, Irina Nikulina:

Cochylis dubitana?

01.08.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Axylia putris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.08.2014 22:07, Irina Nikulina:

Archips oporana?

01.08.2014 22:06, Irina Nikulina:

Archips oporana?

01.08.2014 22:02, Irina Nikulina:

Apamea crenata?

01.08.2014 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hoplodrina octogenaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.08.2014 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Octogenaria

01.08.2014 21:57, Irina Nikulina:

Hoplodrina octogenaria? Or ambigua?

01.08.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course it is normal, but all the same I recommend to pay attention to the date marked in these pictures :)

01.08.2014 21:56, Irina Nikulina:

Hoplodrina octogenaria? Or ambigua?

01.08.2014 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, now it is necessary to bring up and get the imago that it was here inferential :)

01.08.2014 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

01.08.2014 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

01.08.2014 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

01.08.2014 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

01.08.2014 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

01.08.2014 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

01.08.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Actias sinensis / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.08.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Actias sinensis / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.08.2014 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoplusia ni / Confidently identified / Ozgur Kocak.

01.08.2014 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vladimir Savchuk.

01.08.2014 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, downloading photos should write only the name of the butterfly species, and not "Caterpillar Pyrrhia exprimens on Aconitum septentrionale" Because of what is written in such detail photos and horrible for moderation.

01.08.2014 18:49, Alex Dumchus:

Loepa sp

01.08.2014 18:45, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium alebion ???

01.08.2014 18:19, Ozgur Kocak:

Trichoplusia ni *

01.08.2014 17:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.08.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.08.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

01.08.2014 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree.

01.08.2014 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Macaria alternata / Vitalij Dobronosov Macaria notata / Basil Sergienko.

01.08.2014 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I betPyrausta sanguinalis. Does anyone else have any views of anything?

01.08.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Triodia sylvina / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.08.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Triodia sylvina / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.07.2014 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is necessary to make one more point-type pictures, and not just males but females with caterpillars.

31.07.2014 22:05, Alex Dumchus:

Today, not throwing. Tomorrow or the other day try again. If you fail, we will act the same.

31.07.2014 22:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Tr ... top wings :)
It must be a new tag!

31.07.2014 21:11, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, who had just walked out of your Akka and hassle replaced by a new fotoy old (this http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/32051 this http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/20764). After a complete renovation of the page with the old fotoy (in most browsers Ctrl + F5) - everything is OK, the page of the old foty new file. Do you now something else does not work or have all the rules?

31.07.2014 20:23, Alex Dumchus:

Well yes. Zaparke messed up on. Thank you, Basil. And then there is the form (on our website is not) Alcides aurora, perhaps the most beautiful of them.

31.07.2014 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:) Website Class reaches a new level. It is necessary to make a separate gallery for this. I am looking at it, and he'll start cooking :)

31.07.2014 19:15, Basil Sergienko:

It seems like notata

31.07.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichoplusia ni / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

31.07.2014 17:21, Ozgur Kocak:

Looks like Phragmatobia fuliginosa *

31.07.2014 16:51, Basil Sergienko:

Trichoplusia ni

31.07.2014 0:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Incidentally, according to my personal observations in the margins is quite rare scoop ......
Houses on raspravilku :)

30.07.2014 19:37, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 21028

30.07.2014 19:37, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 21027

30.07.2014 19:30, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 15666

30.07.2014 19:25, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 15664

30.07.2014 19:22, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 15665

30.07.2014 19:16, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 14101

30.07.2014 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, it's not sudnys Alcides (reversed letters). Pretending Alcides cydnus and moved.

30.07.2014 18:12, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 14102

30.07.2014 18:08, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 14345

30.07.2014 18:07, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 14344

30.07.2014 18:01, Alex Dumchus:

Alcides cudnys

30.07.2014 17:45, Igor Sakhno:

It is not clear that it could happen. Well, underdeveloped wings and proboscis not spun - it happens, but on it is almost no "hair"!

30.07.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it's time to illustrate the kind of ...... Butterfly from my balcony :)
I do not expect, to be honest.

30.07.2014 17:40, Peter Khramov:

According trapped Alexander confirmed it will go to ...

30.07.2014 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something in the South Urals really bad .... I have the window at this point ....... 31 However, in this heat intensity volley at us too close to zero (

30.07.2014 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it is not a failure ..... girlfriend :)

30.07.2014 15:27, Igor Sakhno:

Not born beautiful ...

30.07.2014 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.07.2014 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.07.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.07.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.07.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.07.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.07.2014 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.07.2014 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.07.2014 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second day in a row doing at the balcony finds interesting :)
It turns out: before I exhibited this kind only from Egypt, and now, here from Moscow Railway :)
This is certainly not the first record (the kind we sometimes come across), but before catching all the time strongly lёtannyh, which put on the site did not even want.So first, relatively neat female. Already raspravilke later be straightened :)

30.07.2014 13:04, Vitalij Dobronosov:

I am inclined to think that this is - Lemyra jankowskii (Oberthur, [1881] 1880) (as V. Dubatolov).

30.07.2014 13:02, :

I am inclined to think that this is - Lemyra jankowskii (Oberthur, [1881] 1880) (as V. Dubatolov).

30.07.2014 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.07.2014 8:31, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. Or I tuplyu or do something messed up. I laid out a new picture tayvanusa. They tried to replace the old. He went into the LC, a new picture, wrote replace the old 12279. As a result, a new picture is gone, and the old left. Do not put this. I will act as before, write, delete it. And you too Therefore remove himself.

30.07.2014 8:23, Alex Dumchus:

Finish writing

30.07.2014 0:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I addCerura erminea?

30.07.2014 0:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cerura sp.

30.07.2014 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zelo ourSpilosoma lutealooks like. But the transfer will not undertake due to the geography, alas (
It is necessary that someone else napispl ....

30.07.2014 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis thyodamas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.07.2014 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis thyodamas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thymelicus lineola / Tentatively identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

29.07.2014 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK

29.07.2014 21:59, Eugene Karolinskiy:

moved to inaccurate lineola

29.07.2014 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I can not remove is not with me is right. It is to Peter :)

29.07.2014 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.07.2014 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.07.2014 20:46, Alex Dumchus:

Oh yeah it, Vassily. I have somehow adapted. Just Take away those about which I am writing about a replacement :)

29.07.2014 20:16, Alex Dumchus:

replacement 13185

29.07.2014 20:14, Alex Dumchus:

replacement 13186

29.07.2014 20:12, Alex Dumchus:

replacement 13187

29.07.2014 20:10, Alex Dumchus:

Replacement 13188

29.07.2014 20:05, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 13191

29.07.2014 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the words of Vlad rare species. It benefited from the micro to start to collect and edit, however :)

29.07.2014 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vlad Proklov.

29.07.2014 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vlad Proklov.

29.07.2014 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

29.07.2014 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

29.07.2014 15:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But it is not exactly sylvanus. And do not even Ochlodes. Or move to inaccurate lineola? Someone believes?

29.07.2014 15:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Elena Lobovikova Not identified.

29.07.2014 15:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

About :) See how to live in this "mysterious" look .....

29.07.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The base did not take place earlier. I swear and did not expect E. quercinaria rooms.
Nevertheless, it's not E. erosaria, and E. autumnaria /
Change the base :)
Ennomos erosaria: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1091-ennomos-erosarius
Ennomos autumnaria: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1088-ennomos-autumnarius

29.07.2014 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C can drive you mad :) One would have thought that flies to the balcony .... Thank you, Basil. Sly and the view is illustrated (the first photo on the website turned out) :)

29.07.2014 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

29.07.2014 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ennomos erosaria Ennomos quercinaria.

29.07.2014 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

29.07.2014 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ennomos erosaria Ennomos quercinaria.

29.07.2014 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ennomos erosaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov Ennomos quercinaria / Basil Sergienko.

29.07.2014 14:49, Basil Sergienko:

E.quercinaria

29.07.2014 14:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Because it may, sylvestris. I can not answer.

29.07.2014 14:45, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Our "reali" Now juvernica.

29.07.2014 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MOVED on the same basis as the previous picture.

29.07.2014 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ennomos erosaria / Masha Gill Ennomos autumnaria / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2014 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The base of the iron: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31985

29.07.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ennomos erosaria / Imago / Sergey Talanov Ennomos autumnaria / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.07.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.07.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.07.2014 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And this autumnaria my :)

29.07.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

29.07.2014 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

29.07.2014 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

29.07.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ennomos erosaria / Imago / Sergey Talanov Ennomos autumnaria / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.07.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No options autumnaria. The abundance of black spots on the wings clear about this. I stand.

29.07.2014 11:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

TakiEnnomos autumnariamy? The underside up to her more than to erosaria. Just look and compare the underside of both. Who says that?

29.07.2014 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suppose that here, too, the background does not bother anyone: it plika ceramic, which is decorated house outside :)
Butterfly collected and will later be straightened photos.

29.07.2014 2:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added a "live" feed the plant once I had not kicked for it :) The caterpillar eats not only "Rotten leaves on the soil, forest litter and withered grasses," as it was described on the page before.

29.07.2014 2:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.07.2014 2:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio ulysses.

29.07.2014 1:02, Vladimir Bobow:

Vasily thank you very much for the advice, it is my first experiments in this direction. Before, I preferred to take pictures of butterflies live, but it is not always possible. So we will learn.

28.07.2014 23:27, Evgeny Komarov:

OK!

28.07.2014 23:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. And do not throw bricks at me for it :)

28.07.2014 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ambulyx sericeipennis Ambulyx tobii.

28.07.2014 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here, he is also quite like a separate kind of normal sense: http://zipcodezoo.com/Animals/A/Ambulyx_tobii/
Post by Koshkin on Molbiole: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?s=9949a135351a1bcff042bfade67c46dc&showtopic=185709&view=findpost&p=1453262
Grounds enough. I pretend.

28.07.2014 23:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Let the left, which is now. Especially if one pops up a few Latin Russian ... will be significant.

28.07.2014 23:08, Evgeny Komarov:

What people say ...? Specialists revelers East Asia are somehow not visible. It is necessary to believe the available resources.

28.07.2014 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But wait a while, that people still say about this :)

28.07.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then in my opinion it is necessary to remove it from the subspecies and do a separate species: Ambulyx tobii Inoue, 1976 .
Site Tony Pittaveya can completely trust: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/a_tob.htm
There he is, the way for Russia has shown.
Now I pretend and bear :) Will only remove the subspecies from the description Ambulyx sericeipennis

28.07.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to update: simple ostaёsya old image in the browser cache and we should change it there by updating to the new. Peter, I understand this is clarified.
P.S. Today when I opened for the first time this page I immediately appear to a new image and it was, because the other browser.

28.07.2014 22:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, but it does not seem to interfere in fact. All the same site for a broad range of people and a quick search on the Russian name search is also conducted.

28.07.2014 22:00, Shamil Murtazin:

The trap would take. But! We have a terrible cold. I'm afraid this season demonstration test will not be able to do.

28.07.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander and subspecies I have no way to finish, and it is necessary that you add it to the LC samostoyaelno in line "Update classification" . It should look like this: Papilio ulysses ssp. telegonus [C. & R. Felder, 1860]

28.07.2014 21:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Subspecies tobii online Sphingidae of the Eastern Palaearctic, and not only is as an independent. In Sineva & Co Unknown. For the Russian Federation Set in 2013: Cat ES, VG Bezborodov Ambulyx tobii (Inoue, 1976) (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) - a new species and genus of hawk moths fauna of Russia from southern Primorye // Eurasian Entomological Journal. T. 12 (4). 2013. pp 415-419.

28.07.2014 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio ulysses.

28.07.2014 21:32, Alex Dumchus:

P.ulysses telegonus, male

28.07.2014 21:12, Alex Dumchus:

13852 return

28.07.2014 21:09, Alex Dumchus:

13853 return

28.07.2014 21:05, Alex Dumchus:

Rather 13854

28.07.2014 21:01, Alex Dumchus:

Rather 13855

28.07.2014 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiblema scutulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.07.2014 20:11, Alex Dumchus:

Every time update uncomfortable. Although poprobuyu..pozzhe :)

28.07.2014 20:08, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 13858

28.07.2014 20:03, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 12263

28.07.2014 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, just try to refresh the page with the old image in the browser :)

28.07.2014 20:00, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 12280

28.07.2014 20:00, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 12279

28.07.2014 19:57, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 12665

28.07.2014 19:53, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 12666

28.07.2014 19:50, Alex Dumchus:

Instead 12255

28.07.2014 19:48, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. Does not work. All I do, as you said, was just an old picture, and the new left. It is better to stand and I will write, which replaced

28.07.2014 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri is certainly necessary to pull it. But it will be when you can spread the image directly on the site, and not to other resources. There are several plans to the technical merits of (not related to taking pictures of butterflies). In short: "plenty of plans," the main thing now, to opportunity and enough time for it :)

28.07.2014 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Correctly. It may even remove all the "cabbage", "Chocolate", "purple moths", etc. ? Opinion of the old grumbler :)

28.07.2014 18:22, Basil Sergienko:

Hydrelia sp. there are three similar species.

28.07.2014 17:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Can anyone confused background, so it's on the fence removed. And the butterfly is alive. Vasily fly to the balcony, and I look around the fences in the vicinity.

28.07.2014 17:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, thank you all. Image and text quite clearly. Can it make a separate topic. Suddenly, another who wants to try poraspravlyat

28.07.2014 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, from my soap box with a flashlight, this trick does not go into any :) already tried once. Therefore I prefer podmarivat and only then shoot in normal conditions.

28.07.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, I want to remind you that the book, which I have laid out for the July 18 put up on the shelf life of 30 days filehosting. This is the maximum period that allows this resource. Therefore, if you have not downloaded something advise pooropitsya. The book is not forever will lie on these links.Well, for clarity, how to look at raspravilkeMalacosoma neustriaandSpilosoma luteain my version:

Thin strips of tracing paper at the root of the wing is needed to make the initial position of the wings, and then the remainder of the wing closes more dense and desirable as transparent paper.I actually do not use for this paper, and I buy in the stationery and then I cut into strips of clear plastic folder for documents. The plastic from which they are made is ideal for this purpose. Well dry butterfly of this size on raspravilke my climatic conditions approx. during the week.In Vladivostok, the humidity should be increased as the nearby ocean and thus the drying process will take longer. Butterfly before it is removed from the raspravilki should be well dried: this is important! In short, over time, learn to. Good luck :)

28.07.2014 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm a little povystupayu :)
We value photographed on a dark screen (UV light) just need to highlight the butterfly lantern to fotoaparat brought sharpness and not starve :)
in the case where the butterfly zamarivaetsya not pulled myself together, it looks like entrapment slippers and you Vasily and me. (I go to this, only very few copies.arriving in the unit, but not trivial)

28.07.2014 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I went for lunch spider Misumena vatia
As before, my Aporia Crataegi: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29530

28.07.2014 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Sergei Kotov.

28.07.2014 15:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Peter!

28.07.2014 14:29, Peter Khramov:

Smooth better that the scales are not ripped off. Better yet (if it is a lot), to one side it had a smooth (for cheshuki) and other rough (finger).

28.07.2014 14:00, Viktor Kolesnikov:

I agree. So headings look better

28.07.2014 12:51, Vladimir Bryukhov:

I'm not lazy, just missed somehow this moment. MEND.
And in this case, and not a living, not a collector ...)

28.07.2014 12:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

two weeks on the telephone only in the net I will not presume to define.

28.07.2014 12:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, for tracing enlighten. There tracing The drawing under the ink, it is smooth and there is a pencil - more rough. Over rough probably better?

28.07.2014 11:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I took note.

28.07.2014 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Year does not have any value: it is the basics and know-how on this subject there is no per se.
For raspravki you will need at least the following:
TN "Raspravilka" pins, so-called "dissecting needle" (in some cases, you can do without it), tweezers with smooth jaws, pins, The drawing and tracing paper thicker paper. Well, then: read the literature.Sam studied only on the books in the period of the great country of the USSR and still other methods do not know.

28.07.2014 10:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, I remember about the link. I promised to bring the book tomorrow, do not know the truth until what year. I will try to understand.

28.07.2014 0:20, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, do not be lazy to put down the properties of the "top / underside" and "live / collector" for instance, will you?)

27.07.2014 22:43, Peter Khramov:

Who says that? ..

27.07.2014 22:01, Peter Khramov:

Russian name in the headlines removed. Left plus Latin author / year. Russian names mentioned in Title (you can see in the title of the tab / browser window) and in the body of species features (full name of the section of the form). Write, comfortable / uncomfortable.

27.07.2014 21:53, Peter Khramov:

Alexander zvyakni my phone or just write the steps that and on what pages are doing.

27.07.2014 21:19, Alex Dumchus:

Something I hardship a replacement for good ph. Somehow I can not combine pictures underside and top. Comp writes: This picture belongs to you another author :))

27.07.2014 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In raspravke experience usually comes with time and once good will: it is an axiom. Another decent spoil material. And what about an angle of 90 degrees: this rule. And it must be adhered to. Yuri, I recently gave you a reference to the book is very necessary for a beginner. Please download it and read there about raspravku all true written.And much more, all available language :)

27.07.2014 17:25, Peter Khramov:

The requirement is mandatory. With regard raspravki - they can crawl down, holding back their own strips of parchment / tracing paper / ribbon / paper with pins? Yuri probably attaches the wing just not strong enough.

27.07.2014 17:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, I agree that does not look, but others. Net.V picture is nature, as I see it constantly with folded wings. That had to catch to remove the top.
With the unfolding problems are not so simple as the kazalos.Vrode Zamora starting to spread, and the front fenders are heading south.It is impossible at times under the angle of the wings 90, in relation to the body. By the way, this requirement necessary? or enough to match up the picture at the expansion of the upper and lower wings?

27.07.2014 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, I did not submit to such an example Rhopalocera (daytime) butterflies :))) Slightly explain why he do so.
The screen on which fishing is in my house, on the balcony and he highlighted ultraviolet lamps. In this light picture obviously will not.Therefore, I first collect butterflies, and then stand in the apartment where I fitted the place for shooting. And of course I have to honestly write that podmarivayu :) With Butterflies This trick does not pass and shoot better, or in the nature or straightened: no other way.Agree: the butterfly on your photo looks like its sneakers prishibli first, and then sfotat ...

27.07.2014 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

27.07.2014 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

27.07.2014 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Basil Sergienko.

27.07.2014 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Alexandr Zhakov.

27.07.2014 1:18, Peter Khramov:

There are about 500 rooms mixed entomological pins 5 and 6 (in one package). Of these, about 400 - black and hundreds nerzhaveykovyh. This is a entosfinksovskie pins.
This true - give away for free the entire package. Reviewed skinte only to the site Lepstora about these dimensions.In Moscow, I can meet or send a delivery to other cities - delivery.
In addition, there is a night trap, but it does not mount on the hooks, and in the pockets. This is good and reliable, but not so comfortable in the assembly, so we will probably do on hooks. In this trap, I'm interested in a review of the quality of the fabric.The trap is reserved for Alexander Dumchusom since he had long laid eyes on her, if he is no longer relevant, before any other user from the site. Traps, unlike the pins are not free, but the price is based on a symbolic Review - 2000 rubles. Still there is the same model in black, she is also interested in the fabric (although it is not black). Sincethis thing is not in the frame and it is black, it will give free oral feedback.
Write on e-mail or in the subject.

26.07.2014 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia epimede / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

26.07.2014 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia epimede / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

26.07.2014 14:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Melanargia epimede

26.07.2014 14:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Melanargia epimede

26.07.2014 9:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Charaxes bernardus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.07.2014 9:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.07.2014 9:28, Alex Dumchus:

Charaxes bernardus, female

26.07.2014 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhia umbra / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2014 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhia umbra / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.07.2014 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite changeable scoop and appeared in recent days in the Railway fly to the light mass. All: suffice it to download from this point :)

26.07.2014 4:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Yponomeuta evonymella / Tentatively identified / Lev Bely Not identified.

25.07.2014 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh, and I doubt-I in the definition. In my opinion it is better to back in neoprene. clean .....
Notice the pattern of the points he had Yponomeuta evonymella quite different: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Yponomeuta_Evonymella

25.07.2014 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

25.07.2014 22:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

25.07.2014 22:38, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

25.07.2014 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have to be confused (maybe A. berbera easily). Therefore please check and leave your opinion :)

25.07.2014 17:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is still possible to identify other onositelno easily ..... It is the only one in the region :)

25.07.2014 14:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also here's one yellow-abdomen http://www.jpmoth.org/Lymantriidae/Lymantria_mathura_aurora.html . Most likely to be some variation.

25.07.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I see, Lymantria mathura male.

25.07.2014 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea biselata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

25.07.2014 13:53, Basil Sergienko:

daea biselata

25.07.2014 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.07.2014 12:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

25.07.2014 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.07.2014 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Difficult question ... Shifting it like a mongrel dog :) will be in abundance, I think :) By the way, the classical, motley form we somehow rarely.

25.07.2014 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Vasily, I started on the other, and this has put on the machine definition and did not see that it is already there. Error corrected. :)

25.07.2014 12:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Andrei Komrakov.

25.07.2014 12:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Andrei Komrakov.

25.07.2014 11:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Already 34 "swallows" is :))), even how long to wait? :)

25.07.2014 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Was going to put its variability ....... "The first swallow", in short :)

25.07.2014 10:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis corylana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2014 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, it's kind of like the author is already defined? The first comment ..

25.07.2014 10:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis corylana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2014 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis corylana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2014 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis corylana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.07.2014 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea dimidiata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

25.07.2014 10:07, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea dimidiata

25.07.2014 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea emarginata / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

25.07.2014 9:38, Andrei Komrakov:

Idaea emarginata (Linnaeus, 1758)

25.07.2014 9:37, Andrei Komrakov:

Pandemis corylana (Fabricius, 1794)

24.07.2014 22:11, Alex Dumchus:

Fixed

24.07.2014 22:09, Alex Dumchus:

Charaxes bernardus?

24.07.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

24.07.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Stand to adippam: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26492

24.07.2014 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

24.07.2014 21:24, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Adippa, yes.

24.07.2014 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guyana of course the same. Oh, it's spoken Russian :) Alexander, correct LK at if there is more :)

24.07.2014 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

24.07.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

24.07.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guyana right.

24.07.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

24.07.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

24.07.2014 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my opinion, too adippa. Check underside: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26493
Wait until Wrap: it is necessary to anyone else spoke.

24.07.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta alni / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.07.2014 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander is not tied back. Now only Peter could unleash :)

24.07.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria selene / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

24.07.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria selene / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

24.07.2014 20:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

selene

24.07.2014 20:58, Alexsandr Martukov:

selene

24.07.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.07.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.07.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

24.07.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apamea anceps / Vasiliy Feoktistov Anarta trifolii / Basil Sergienko.

24.07.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apamea anceps / Vasiliy Feoktistov Anarta trifolii / Basil Sergienko.

24.07.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apamea anceps / Vasiliy Feoktistov Anarta trifolii / Basil Sergienko.

24.07.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I'm not sure right, Thank you :)

24.07.2014 20:33, Basil Sergienko:

Actually, it's called good Anarta trifolii

24.07.2014 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Somehow, I am unsure of the definition. Take a look, please :)

24.07.2014 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gradually recovering from memory (then still was not Moder) :)

24.07.2014 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Kukharenko.

24.07.2014 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, now restored historical justice :) Eugene, with the arrival on site. And here we have remembered with Alexander :)

24.07.2014 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Khalaim Yevgeniy.

24.07.2014 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

24.07.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

24.07.2014 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All rights begin our regiment arrived :) :) Vladimir, to fix it.
Well I do not restrain myself from a couple of comments:
1) The lower edge of the front wing must be perpendicular to the chest. Not always, this is followed by (myself included), but by channeling raspravki should look that way.2) It's no good use for tattoos sewing needles (butterfly my impaled on it): they rust in the body of the insect, fat, etc. There are special, entomological pins: http: // lepstore.ru / catalog / s17
Involuntarily, Peter was advertising, but it is necessary to use these pins :) They are specially designed for this collection, and they will have a proper look.
Once again a wide effort :)

24.07.2014 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arytrura subfalcata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.07.2014 12:59, Alex Dumchus:

Were caught in the light of 4 individuals, a couple just released

23.07.2014 23:05, Igor Sakhno:

I tried to catch two in the field, but no! Only the more distant photo of something clears up, but of course, without details. I can, by the way, and it lay.

23.07.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, do not spread doubles. Write to Peter, and I think it will give you the opportunity to change their own photos.

23.07.2014 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noctua janthina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noctua janthina / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 13:55, Zoran Bozovic:

Epinotia subocellana ??? *

23.07.2014 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Catocala neonympha.

23.07.2014 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala neonympha / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

But the appearance of butterflies, I would say, scientific :))), for the collection, only the first copies.

23.07.2014 13:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala hymenaea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 13:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala hymenaea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 13:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

On the lower wing, closest toCatocala hymenaea, and on top of scratch my head. Well, not her, but what? I do not know.

23.07.2014 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Neither of which currently so new to the Russian view of the scoop. Check and publish necessary. Congratulations.

23.07.2014 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noctua tirrenica / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noctua tirrenica / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zeuzera pyrina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zeuzera pyrina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hoplodrina ambigua / Confidently identified Hoplodrina blanda / Tentatively identified.

23.07.2014 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hoplodrina ambigua / Confidently identified Hoplodrina blanda / Tentatively identified.

23.07.2014 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hoplodrina ambigua / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Hoplodrina superstes / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.07.2014 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aracima muscosa / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.07.2014 12:06, Alex Dumchus:

Well, it seems, I have learned to do the normal photo.
Peter Basil perefotat want your bad photos from the collection of those that are dark, the shadow. A lot of stuff just one (my) kind of pictures on the site. As it is technically possible to do- spread and ask you to replace or give poss. to replace ??

23.07.2014 11:59, Yuri Semejkin:

I'll try to say it's Aracima muscosa

23.07.2014 10:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

23.07.2014 10:38, Peter Khramov:

By klassieke recommend that gloza were sharp and that and the other, but here in this view turned out very interesting. One may even better.

23.07.2014 10:36, Peter Khramov:

As well, it is them, moths need! -)

23.07.2014 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is where the pins are zero expended some :) But in reality: the expanded small fry here is not enough. While with travyanok started.

23.07.2014 9:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

And maybe, well, they ... :)))

23.07.2014 5:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"The first pancake," So I will go to any moles soon :)

22.07.2014 23:50, Alexsandr Martukov:

Thank you, yes, there is an occasion for reflection and learning :)

22.07.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.07.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plebejus idas / Vasiliy Feoktistov Plebejus argus / Fyodor Pudovikov.

22.07.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vyblr here between the two: sinapis and reali should be :)

22.07.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The question mark is why?

22.07.2014 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ochlodes sylvanus / Elena Lobovikova Thymelicus lineola / Eugene Karolinskiy.

22.07.2014 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ochlodes sylvanus / Elena Lobovikova Thymelicus lineola / Eugene Karolinskiy.

22.07.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

22.07.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plebejus idas / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

22.07.2014 22:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

?lineola

22.07.2014 22:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

lineola

22.07.2014 22:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

lineola

22.07.2014 22:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

..ili yuvernika. There accurate determination and so will not. :)

22.07.2014 22:04, Fyodor Pudovikov:

And that P. argus.

22.07.2014 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please indicate the date of photo.

22.07.2014 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you :) And I have not looked. What does it mean tired :)

22.07.2014 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hoplodrina ambigua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.07.2014 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hoplodrina ambigua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.07.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While like all urabotal today .... And at night I will kindle again :)

22.07.2014 19:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil rest :)))

22.07.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whew ... Force is no more ... We odohnut :)
SmallerOrthosia populeti? Time very confused: I have stated: "March - May" "

22.07.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I ponastavili its variations and about straightened rusty :) fill ...

22.07.2014 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthocrambus saxonellus / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.07.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.07.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.07.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.07.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you :)

22.07.2014 15:18, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

22.07.2014 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, you look it, please :) Small: size as O. strigilis approx. For the first time I gathered this.

22.07.2014 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander, the difference from the photo, the size is not taken into account. there Vasily wrote everything correctly, yurtina much larger Lycaon. Females tlichno differ from the top and from the bottom:
1. On the upper wing 1 eye at yurtiny 2 at Lycaon.
2. nizhu coloring is very bright at yurtiny, a little lighter than the male at Lycaon.males, with no top size can not tell, both types of one eye. but the lower wing from the bottom perfectly distinguished:
Lycaon have seen very indistinctly sling it does not contrast, when there is no small black eyes;
at yurtiny, sash contrast, clear and almost always 2-1 black eye.

22.07.2014 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is variable (Lycaon) ..... very.

22.07.2014 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, in males. Only typical female Lycaon 2

22.07.2014 14:10, Alexsandr Martukov:

In Berlova is a form of male with one eye on Baikal http://babochki.narod.ru/sa10.html

22.07.2014 14:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Butterfly small. With a wingspan of up to 1.5 cm

22.07.2014 14:03, Alexsandr Martukov:

Androconial bar is visible, but no fluorine eye ... http://rarefree.fr/interactif/photos%20nymphalidae/3409.jpg

22.07.2014 13:54, Alexsandr Martukov:

So, I'm still not clear ... it turns out that Voloveva eyes and Lycaon one peephole on top of the wings?

22.07.2014 13:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let me tezu and seen as the antithesis razlichinie these kinds of NN Smelters in 1950 (while both types were like old Epinephele):

22.07.2014 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

STE male Lycaon far as I know, and much less on the size of oxen eye he caught himself :) and will have to somehow put a series on the subject variability (assembled it) :)

22.07.2014 12:41, Alexsandr Martukov:

Zdesya one eye (for Zhakov), case no oxen eyes ... :)

22.07.2014 12:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

Nitsche not understand ... Here mulberries one eye, it turns out similar to the eyes of oxen ... http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26942

22.07.2014 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please do not hit hurt because I put a lot of zheltushki :) Honestly, I do not see that someone else - a kind exhibited recently this beautiful, Meshchera views. It's just that I have the opportunity to present her repeatedly. By the way: this season it a little fly in nature .... apparently influenced by the weather.

22.07.2014 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree. For me they are well differ if seeing them side by side. And in nature is always individually recognize each. But photo confused and do not know why (For lyupinusa nothing to say: it is not like we do.

22.07.2014 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Priydёm consensus :) This finding exactly one year from that same point I say "staked" first :)

22.07.2014 11:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

A good deal, this is when the first time to the region, but it is really possible and a creaking heart, as well as from the point of view of already known, ...
All criticism ends. :)))

22.07.2014 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

For marriage, not ubiditelno.

22.07.2014 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Both of these species are very well characterized, in contrast to the pair Hyponephele lycaon - Hyponephele lupinus. :))

22.07.2014 11:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first comment is written. Or wormwood kapyushonnitsy here a lot? From MO especially?

22.07.2014 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Since variability in both "Mama Do not Cry." On underside can not be reliably determined from the mine. I have this kind of small, but Lycaon collected a lot: it is necessary to lay out will be later for its variability. And if we compare the purely visual: ox eye is much larger than Lycaon.

22.07.2014 11:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I'm just curious, why after the photo, butterflies normal quality. to lay out a clear minus :) Planck quality falls lower and lower, do not think for chicane, constructive criticism :))

22.07.2014 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

And why did you eyes? on the lower wing, on the right wing, because one, for similar types of two :)

22.07.2014 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

:))))

22.07.2014 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus amandus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.07.2014 11:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia artaxerxes / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.07.2014 11:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Radi, whose interest?
Basil, you'll excuse me, but it's all garbage, why pollute the site. (((
And it is not defined properly, look at the sash on the lower wing isPseudoterpna pruinata. There is clearly overkill.

22.07.2014 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uploaded for fun. And I think this is it, though trudnouznavaema.
Fairly parched instance. Nevertheless he rushed me like mad and had to run for her :)

22.07.2014 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptidea sinapis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.07.2014 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Coenonympha glycerion / Confidently identified / Female / Alexsandr Martukov.

22.07.2014 8:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

22.07.2014 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Maniola jurtina / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

22.07.2014 7:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

22.07.2014 7:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

22.07.2014 0:01, Alexsandr Martukov:

In the original, do not wa ... photo from different angles to look, we can see the eyes?

21.07.2014 23:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

Wow!)

21.07.2014 23:17, Alexsandr Martukov:

Glitserion. Female

21.07.2014 23:16, Alexsandr Martukov:

Levan

21.07.2014 23:16, Alexsandr Martukov:

ox eye

21.07.2014 23:15, Alexsandr Martukov:

Levan

21.07.2014 23:15, Alexsandr Martukov:

Levan

21.07.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Although my eyes are female ox without holes .....

21.07.2014 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On the underside of the rear wing at jurtina 2 black dots / eye. Lycaon have none. Like so.
I did not see yesterday (

21.07.2014 21:48, Alexsandr Martukov:

And how do you know what is the difference then?

21.07.2014 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But there is nothing particularly surprising :)
There, from Vladivostok to China roughly the same as I am today in the Vladimir region traveled on the train one way (direct) :)

21.07.2014 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius telesiphe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.07.2014 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius telesiphe / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.07.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chorinea batesii / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.07.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chorinea batesii / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.07.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perrhybris pamela / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.07.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perrhybris pamela / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

21.07.2014 21:10, Alex Dumchus:

Heliconius telesiphe

21.07.2014 21:08, Alex Dumchus:

Chorinea batesi

21.07.2014 21:04, Alex Dumchus:

Pieriballia mandela ??

21.07.2014 21:01, Alex Dumchus:

Perrhybris lorena ??

21.07.2014 21:00, Alex Dumchus:

Perrhybris pyrrha

21.07.2014 20:55, Alex Dumchus:

Evenus gabriela ??

21.07.2014 18:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Last age.

21.07.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglia tau / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.07.2014 17:59, Yuri Semejkin:

It is what it is.

21.07.2014 16:24, Peter Khramov:

Wow, what are your tama inhabited creation ...

21.07.2014 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa venusta / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

21.07.2014 13:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Sarbanissa venusta defined: Kononenko VS BPI FEB RAS

21.07.2014 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not know whether the right-track mind focused on the definition :) So put in inaccurate.
Can you confirm or deny

21.07.2014 6:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Constant despite hefty polёtannost this instance I think finding a good kind. Quite a rare view of the edges :) my only the second time in the life of this kapyushonnitsu we catch.
P.S. And where else, andCuculia fraudatrixflies :) Do not give up hope that her svezёt .....

21.07.2014 1:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All: bedtime: something spёksya me :)

21.07.2014 1:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.07.2014 1:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus amandus / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.07.2014 1:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hyponephele lycaon Maniola jurtina.

21.07.2014 1:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hyponephele lycaon / Vasiliy Feoktistov Maniola jurtina / Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.07.2014 0:57, Eugene Karolinskiy:

amanda

21.07.2014 0:55, Eugene Karolinskiy:

jurtina

20.07.2014 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first butterfly today :) it's hard for me, so put in inaccurate. It wanted more opinions regarding the definition.

20.07.2014 22:27, Peter Khramov:

Hmmm ... As for the equipment - still needed. Yet today it is not necessary to use the same piece of iron as 50 years ago. And most importantly - you can mold much less and much less homemade refer to a Friend turner / fitter ...

20.07.2014 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He is, my dear :)

20.07.2014 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyponephele lycaon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2014 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hyponephele lycaon.

20.07.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2014 22:13, Alexsandr Martukov:

They flew paravozik me, dragged through the bushes and trees, the heat was running like mad, stalking, drove across the lawn, where better to sit;)) ... took fifty frames ... only a couple of frames more or less successful (the camera is dropped ... a plastic lens (and alas ...), well that was a portrait lens with makrolinzoy (Marum) ...

20.07.2014 22:08, Alexsandr Martukov:

Yes I here first thought that the eyes of oxen, but this yes, less ... oxen identity eyes, this was a lawn, but so shy that he could not really take off ...

20.07.2014 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just want to organize all in one style, the butterfly has two forms. Also spring one, f. levana. Dreams, dreams......

20.07.2014 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.07.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spring, the standard form: Araschnia levana f. levana

20.07.2014 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In these books the most simply described the basics for beginners, but here's the update does not need the idea. The main difference in these books only in the date as of publication, etc. :)

20.07.2014 21:32, Peter Khramov:

Well so I mean that there is a new book and still on sale. Infa Although it seemed to me, for the most part not from this century. I think many illustrations, one to one in yours. But not so fast in this area that is changing, and the amount of information in this publication is all respect.

20.07.2014 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is a new kind of :)
I have the original one, to which I gave a link with childhood kept on the shelf (already know by heart, as well as a bank of memory) :)

20.07.2014 21:22, Peter Khramov:

On the Rights of the cynical advertising - book http://lepstore.ru/catalog/1887.

20.07.2014 21:19, Peter Khramov:

The terms deceived: -) I had to make a pause in the work site. Now to finish the section Collections , and after him will have separate gallery for habitats and blogs with extended functionality for all users zaregalsya.

20.07.2014 21:17, Peter Khramov:

Good work.

20.07.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyponephele lycaon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyponephele lycaon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.07.2014 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What's there to ask :) stand Lycaonia.

20.07.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, are smaller than theManiola jurtina? If so, itHyponephele lycaonand this means that it is the triumphant march to the north. We have it already probably a dozen years in the mass so that "the oxen's eyes" on its background almost invisible.

20.07.2014 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Closer to winter'll :)

20.07.2014 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Soon the blog section will be open to all registered users of replenishment. There will be very relevant materials such as Ruslan and the truth is not lost, write.

20.07.2014 20:50, Peter Khramov:

Zhdems!

20.07.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I hasten to dedicate people in their plans :) Nuns I have collected a large series for the variability of the species and gradually I want to show here this variability. So do not be surprised if from me will appear here all kind of new images that seem both the Gallery and without enough :)

20.07.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.07.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lexias pardalis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.07.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lexias pardalis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.07.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

20.07.2014 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

20.07.2014 16:55, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the weather is now just below the season ...
ZY Eugene hvostatok transfer, however, I have noted that the blue of it under a different name than you have, but there is still a synonym all options. And once type - transferred to it.

20.07.2014 16:47, Peter Khramov:

Previously, captions and names of the authors were on their pages in their own language. It was not a problem for the Russian and English, and there was almost no for languages ​​that use the Latin alphabet typical. But with more original varintami problem was because Read, for example, Chinese characters, it was quite uncomfortable, and how to contact the author - is unclear.Now the program finished, and if the author's name in Cyrillic - it displays it, and if not - the name is not displayed in the native language of the author, and Latin. It works in the captions to the photos on the personal page, and the author (where, if necessary, displayed both).
Thank you Vasily Feoktistov, pointed to this problem.

20.07.2014 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have. Only now I forget about it. Looks because of the schedule is now inverted three sheets: working for days and sleep for the night work only 3 hours :) And today, I will kindle a host and polovlyu hours to two nights, and then get up at 5 am and go to swing a net under the End of the Line A .. what to do? Season and it is necessary to "strike while the iron is hot" :) That's how we live ......

20.07.2014 16:10, Peter Khramov:

If then, bear in mind that before 12:00 I usually do not wake up, so the reaction to the comments left by 9 and 11, and often 13 hours will be at one and the same time: -)

20.07.2014 14:41, Alex Dumchus:

Lexias pardalis ???

20.07.2014 14:36, Alex Dumchus:

Stichophthalma deviatkini ???

20.07.2014 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But not for that, actually :)
We have easier with them: only two similar species:Orgyia antiquaandOrgyia recensOf the two, only to feed Orgyia antiqua on the raspberries: guzzled "for both cheeks," and pupate I deduced :) But for DV can only tell tribe (

20.07.2014 13:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks Basil!

20.07.2014 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Did the same genus: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120527
Now we have to move with the renaming of the species there.

20.07.2014 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, I can only advise to look on your own, dalnevostounym Moths tribe Orgyiini: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/419 Alas (

20.07.2014 10:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Who else can say what to feed? Shot on Impatiens Textor, but is no doubt that there will be.

20.07.2014 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add that kind of Argina is left in place. It's just divided and it is necessary to remove these three types in the Mangina out of it.

20.07.2014 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Three types of designated commentaries, which should be in the genus Mangina Kaleka et Kirti, 2001 drag. Rod can do or he will create?

20.07.2014 1:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I mean species that is already on the site. Tomorrow, they will check if you have enough strength after work. And at a personal message because the source of this informal (self-made, you can tell) and it is not widely available :) only for personal use.

20.07.2014 0:55, Peter Khramov:

And why a personal message tokmo? ZY Why should there all kinds of Asian when he writes that the genus is divided into two, and not go to another?

20.07.2014 0:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow I will try to write (there is a suspicion that most or all Asian species, but we need to check). And I can sort of start if necessary.
Peter, so I have a some kind infa (about 700 MB) to 8 reg. that's looking for some little "inspired" :)

20.07.2014 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Write what specific types of drag in a new genus. But the amount of work my humble servant on the site in recent years can not be overestimated: -)

19.07.2014 23:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Properly done, it was removed, but the fact that I added (pp) true :) Tomorrow, I will repeat the Old Poshukayte already on this, particularly the butterfly on its reliable sources (at least in my opinion necessary, including kormovuhu tracks available).By the way, did not you notice how your servant pokornyyi spent as a private message? I've got this infa and is reliable in the native, the eighth region :)
Peter, still do offer native Argina / Mangina: it does not give me a rest after all the reasons adduced Dubatolov railways and there is nothing here to wonder: it is necessary to drag or rename without question.

19.07.2014 22:09, Peter Khramov:

Thank you!

19.07.2014 21:53, Peter Khramov:

Basil, the last two commentaries about wingspan removed, because the modders to discuss this topic on people already ill. If we add the Old so, what users require from the ordinary? Remember, first all infa ukladvaetsya to "add" with the source, and only then on the basis of information that is a formalization.So it is always clear, on the basis of what data and from whom a sign formalized. Really do not remember that?

19.07.2014 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

19.07.2014 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cacyreus marshalli / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

19.07.2014 12:45, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Cacyreus marshalli

19.07.2014 12:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ecliptopera silaceata.

19.07.2014 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

19.07.2014 12:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, it's on the fence removed.

19.07.2014 12:23, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2014 12:23, Basil Sergienko:

Ecliptoptera silaceata

19.07.2014 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bolt cool :)

19.07.2014 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Epirrhoe alternata / Zoran Bozovic Epirrhoe galiata / Basil Sergienko.

19.07.2014 9:23, Basil Sergienko:

It is not alternata, and Epirrhoe galiata

19.07.2014 5:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put in yet so inaccurate as there is a doubt: now the time andEpirrhoe rivatacan be.
Therefore I ask for clarification :)

19.07.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, I got confused :)

19.07.2014 4:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Basil Sergienko Andrei Komrakov.

19.07.2014 4:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea aversata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

19.07.2014 4:17, Andrei Komrakov:

Idaea aversata (Linnaeus, 1758)

19.07.2014 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Svetlana, there is written - "for future discussion / article". How will the text - and discuss. A simple explanation for the fact that it is clear what the next online phot of this species.

18.07.2014 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia intricata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Eupithecia virgaureata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

18.07.2014 23:03, Basil Sergienko:

The male of the second generation virgaureata.

18.07.2014 22:55, Svetlana Shchavelina:

This is a joke??? Since working with SLR camera, I just hurt that her coffin called them .... At the time, I enjoyed bezzerkalkoy (quite decent, I must say) for shooting flowers Hoya (my main hobby), but at some point I realized that the power This camera is not enough to transmit what I want.So come to the SLR, nay, to the macro (not to be confused with a close-up).
This image ... but why then full frame? Fair is no background to show the artistic image, the right-butterflies overexposed ... do not understand ..... what the idea is ???

18.07.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichomoplata cassiope / Confidently identified / Enio Branco.

18.07.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.07.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plebejus argyrognomon / Viktor Kolesnikov Plebejus argus / Irina Nikulina.

18.07.2014 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Untied.

18.07.2014 21:48, Peter Khramov:

People, if someone asked why, and I still did not, ask apnut appropriate topic now is the time to work closely with the site.

18.07.2014 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Uploading full frame without Kropa (only resize) for further discussion / articles on the right compromise between the mirror and fotogrobami wretched soap holders. Well, to a point else too: -)

18.07.2014 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.07.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.07.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.07.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.07.2014 16:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Female

18.07.2014 16:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Female

18.07.2014 16:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Female

18.07.2014 15:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/37-rhop/nymphalidae/128-melanargia-russiae copies. four points MO. the type and kind to us intensely populated. More himself, I did not find the truth, but I hope :)

18.07.2014 14:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In our area it is about 4 years ago appeared. Now and in the north of the area already. Steppe species in the forest.

18.07.2014 14:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ruslan Salmanov !!! Arrive unsubscribe as passed. If not difficult to find out the price of gasoline and the opportunity to buy a generator.

18.07.2014 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Congratulations: we have a good view. More recently, the region began to appear :)

18.07.2014 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Melanargia russiae / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.07.2014 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Often this kind of confused with other, closely related speciesDiachrysia stenochrysis.
This year has already downloaded it: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30425
Please note: we Diachrysia chrysitis golden sling never linked jumper, while Diachrysia stenochrysis this jumper is always a more or less pronounced.
That's the easiest way to distinguish between these two types from each other :)

18.07.2014 9:25, Alexsandr Martukov:

Yeah, I read the wiki.

18.07.2014 7:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Char, but the view that it is impossible to pick up.

18.07.2014 7:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, especially for dfx one very zhoroshaya book collection and production of entomological collections:
PDF: http://rghost.ru/56953982 (scan quality is not very much)
djvu: http://rghost.ru/56954003 (good quality scan)
Himself to her as a child and started always recommended to start :)
In spite of the "age" of the publication where almost all of the recommendations are applicable to this day.
Download.And here, too, ask questions if I know-help advice is always :)

18.07.2014 6:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, you oshilis: Hyles is not :)
I put the male: it seems to me so on mustache, but may have to fix :)

18.07.2014 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cossus cossus / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.07.2014 0:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you for the advice. I will try.

18.07.2014 0:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, what can you do: no similar :)

17.07.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Jury to material on raznousym raspravki maintained until the normal state is necessary starve immediately after being caught and then, on the spot on a pin prick. Always I carried with me in the "field" in addition to stains More tweezers, and a box set of pins, which punctures the material on the site.A large butterflies in general should immediately after being caught injecting syringe ("insulin") with a fine needle drop of ammonia (ammonia). At the very least, a backpack with field equipment turns :) Over time you type the experience if you do have a strong desire to do it.

17.07.2014 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Beautiful Moth: violence and fasten when dry.
Actually I decided to do this whole pyadenichnoy small things: they painfully interesting :)

17.07.2014 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.07.2014 17:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Zaspravlenie not the main thing the main thing. bulavochke on to the butterfly was, at least on a mattress. catch into the tube one by one and plug with cotton wool, she's living midit on the wall, come home in a plastic bag with a zipper fleece load the tubes do not take out a few drops of ethyl acetate and an hour prick :)

17.07.2014 17:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, I'm trying to learn smoothing, but is not very good. Moreover, if we take captive, it is dovezёsh-then the form is not the same.

17.07.2014 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, now it is necessary to chop and send Ustyuzhanin 100% definition. Sergei Novitsky, at first, too, only photographed, and now tries to catch photographed, spread and identify only as long as he does not cook. Already a number of new species to the region and Ukraine as a whole caught.:)
Collection does not collect just to clarify that the photographed :)

17.07.2014 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis cerasana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.07.2014 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis cerasana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.07.2014 9:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote bankiana / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

17.07.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe ferrugata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

17.07.2014 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote bankiana / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

17.07.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia contigua / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Lacanobia thalassina / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

17.07.2014 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, let him tady to her and sent :)

17.07.2014 7:00, Basil Sergienko:

Deltote bankiana

17.07.2014 6:58, Basil Sergienko:

Xanthorhoe ferrugata

17.07.2014 6:55, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

17.07.2014 6:53, Basil Sergienko:

In my opinion, this is also thalassina

17.07.2014 5:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, most want to see and remove. They are in the collection of the BPI, but now when I shall get there, I do not know. This is usually when I get on vacation or on sick leave when. I will take off, turn -not so no luck.

17.07.2014 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just uploaded to compare "one hundred percent" contigua-from the same balcony: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/31519

17.07.2014 4:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Osalnye would be interesting to see :) Usually "spectacular" species as subspecies naizobretayut ..... And then they begin to reduce the nominative :)
The "commercial" bugs too terrible to deal with this happening.

17.07.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. Just honest discussion waited for the goose. I'm very kotegoricheski against the lack of data for this picture: it is necessary to check the way, then I think somewhere else saw no geography. And for a long time I am talking about how to do to make the date and place of fishing prerequisite for publication of pictures.In this case, a goose was very interested: there are honest and S. lutea was either P. fuliginosa 50:50's waiting for clarification of the puzzle. Sorry for the harsh tone of some questions.

17.07.2014 3:08, Peter Khramov:

On Friday, the return to Moscow and enter you. And if briefly, then 1) photos with incomplete names on the site should not be, and 2) I did not delete immediately, but left the timeout that the author could get acquainted with your infoy and even respond to it.

16.07.2014 23:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes specific name in this case is repeated 2 times. Total for this type we have 2 or 3 subspecies.

16.07.2014 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And here it is necessary to add a subspecies in the line: "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age)".
This is done by the author in his LC. Fill Yuri. Form: Apatura iris ssp. amurensis Stichel, [1909]
NB: "ssp." I think you can not write: just like so decide and in fact it does not matter.

16.07.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Forgot yesterday to clarify: Papilio maackii maackii Menetries, 1859 is the nominative subspecies. If twice repeated the name of the species it's just Papilio (Achillides) maackii Menetries, 1859 . This, in my view the case of the name of the subspecies is not necessary to build upon.

16.07.2014 17:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta pruinosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.07.2014 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta pruinosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.07.2014 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lithophane lamda / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 17:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caradrina morpheus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eana argentana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula ornata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.07.2014 17:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula tessellaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 17:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Protoschinia scutosa.

16.07.2014 17:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 15:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.07.2014 15:40, Yuri Semejkin:

A. i. amurensis Stichel, [1909].

16.07.2014 15:38, Yuri Semejkin:

A. i. amurensis Stichel, [1909].

16.07.2014 15:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphyia cineraria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.07.2014 15:31, Yuri Semejkin:

That Ms. individual as # 31480: Euphyia cineraria

16.07.2014 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.07.2014 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.07.2014 14:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Ok!

16.07.2014 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phengaris arion / Shamil Murtazin Plebejus argus / Eugene Karolinskiy.

16.07.2014 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri is not understood correctly. :) I take into the account that many uncertain tortrices with DV and cite as an example. the difficulty for me the definition. I wanted to re-define exposed and failed :( defined the previous one. And it is necessary to put a photo of that quality.as an example for what kind of Archips, if flies, it usually massively, and it is necessary to photograph and males and females, and more, if they are different. A photo will anyone interested in the Far East and its knowledgeable and unspecified types will fall to the catalog. Take photos Yuri and more, with DV only a few people are photos. All in good time, they have not lost here :))

16.07.2014 14:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

argus

16.07.2014 14:11, Yuri Semejkin:

P.s. Anyway undefined types

16.07.2014 14:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! If I understand correctly, there is no reason to place on the site certainly does not determine the types? Then I probably did not correctly identify one of the tasks of this site, namely showing the diversity related to Lepidoptera. And no matter what, something at this moment is not detectably or even described, not refined and so on.It will take time and interest in them appears.
With DV tortricidae really a problem. If memory serves, they have more than 700 species. As I said, that they need to study the brigade specialists and involved them in now and then, so far as one man.So, Alexander, if you feel relief listovёrtok a waste of time, it's good, I will not be greater than their fold.

16.07.2014 13:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, do not take this as a reproach, just as an example to explain the situation D butterflies and their definitions. :)
It seems a simple case, in Europe, I have not looked at the exact same sites would write Archips podana, had one such female. I looked at JW this species, but there are 10 that I do not know.Begin to check for two types is not at all a photo, even two no photos of females (on your photo male can not see), as a result of all that looked most appropriate Archips ingentanus, but even inaccurate is impossible to put as 4 types do not saw.+ Complexity of different endings in species names, search engines have to drive two names + have something similar but in the Far East were observed. so be it uncertain if the steep Far East expert determines the method of exclusion :( Alas, time spent without result.

16.07.2014 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Interested in response. From it will form my opinion, whether I need, personal sites as well as my photos. Excuse me.

16.07.2014 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, someone asked to remove the photo-bear tracks from Sasha M? Under that yesterday I wrote a commentary where she should seek the answer? Well, no, just wondering ...... or website material nafik not need already?

16.07.2014 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euproctis similis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euproctis similis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euproctis similis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euproctis similis.

16.07.2014 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris aurichalcana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vlad Proklov Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris aurichalcana / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

16.07.2014 10:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris aurichalcana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 10:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochropacha duplaris / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.07.2014 10:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vlad Proklov.

16.07.2014 5:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vlad Proklov.

15.07.2014 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, Theodore. So I correct inaccurate put them in ... Just like smelled :)

15.07.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plebejus argyrognomon / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Plebejus idas / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plebejus argyrognomon / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Plebejus idas / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plebejus argyrognomon / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Plebejus idas / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plebejus argyrognomon / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Plebejus idas / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena viciae / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

15.07.2014 21:28, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Plebejus idas.

15.07.2014 21:27, Fyodor Pudovikov:

It Plebejus idas.

15.07.2014 21:25, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:25, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:25, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:25, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:24, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena viciae

15.07.2014 21:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Vlad Proklov.

15.07.2014 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.07.2014 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.07.2014 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea degeneraria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

15.07.2014 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tetheella fluctuosa / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

15.07.2014 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphyia cineraria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

15.07.2014 17:04, Basil Sergienko:

Euphyia cineraria

15.07.2014 16:07, Basil Sergienko:

Do not try fluctuosa letter

15.07.2014 16:02, Basil Sergienko:

Tethella luctuosa

15.07.2014 15:41, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea degeneraria

15.07.2014 11:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Female. The subspecies Papilio maackii maackii

15.07.2014 11:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Female. The subspecies Papilio maackii maackii

15.07.2014 8:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Subspecies P.m. maackii

15.07.2014 8:54, Yuri Semejkin:

The subspecies Papilio maackii maackii. The subspecies is given to words Azarov NA BPI FEB RAS

14.07.2014 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another variation :) record holder, however: you can endlessly put the scoop because of its volatility.

14.07.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hesudra bisecta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.07.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Again, please do not write all the species name in the term "Update classification" It's all the same to no purpose: the photo will remain in uncertainty and only Post extra care of it will appear.

14.07.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia russiae / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

14.07.2014 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura metis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura metis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.07.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acrobasis tumidana / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

14.07.2014 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

14.07.2014 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe fluctuata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

14.07.2014 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Philereme transversata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

14.07.2014 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew took the goose is not deducing?

14.07.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By doing this butterfly genus and nakosyachil: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120522
Peter, we need to understand, and then I kind of vobyu and bear it.

14.07.2014 16:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

AUT question four months ago ........

14.07.2014 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did not dare to exact savit immediately. I want to ask to check the definition. The copper-butterfly my knowledge close to zero :)

14.07.2014 11:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula flostata ?

14.07.2014 8:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

14.07.2014 8:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.07.2014 8:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

14.07.2014 8:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

14.07.2014 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

14.07.2014 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.07.2014 8:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

14.07.2014 8:12, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

14.07.2014 8:11, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

14.07.2014 8:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Scopula nigropunctata / Andrei Komrakov Scopula immutata / Basil Sergienko.

14.07.2014 8:10, Basil Sergienko:

immutata

14.07.2014 1:11, Alexsandr Martukov:

Argynnis adippe (cleodoxa)

14.07.2014 1:05, Alexsandr Martukov:

Adippa redder and brighter Niobe ... I think it is better to leave the inaccurate, because few online perfect shot. significant niobium.

14.07.2014 0:56, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

14.07.2014 0:29, Alexsandr Martukov:

Argynnis adippe (cleodoxa)

14.07.2014 0:28, Alexsandr Martukov:

Argynnis adippe (cleodoxa)

14.07.2014 0:28, Alexsandr Martukov:

Argynnis adippe (cleodoxa)

13.07.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, because began to spread like? We strongly recommend to gather a collection. And then the underside will be on hand always :) And if so advice is always help for "those. Part" as a man with a fair experience :)

13.07.2014 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema depressa / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

13.07.2014 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa pulchrina / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

13.07.2014 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa pulchrina / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

13.07.2014 18:32, Shamil Murtazin:

I have so a rotary screen))

13.07.2014 18:11, Andrei Komrakov:

Eilema depressa (Esper, 1787)

13.07.2014 17:17, Andrei Komrakov:

Autographa pulchrina (Haworth, 1809)

13.07.2014 16:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Found. Thank you, Alexander!

13.07.2014 16:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 16:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vlad Proklov Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 16:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

13.07.2014 16:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)) We need a camera with a retractable screen :))

13.07.2014 16:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, the link properly Comibaena amoenaria, that's a good image to the Russian site http://catocala.narod.ru/geom225.html
on the upper wing outer white sash smoothly bent to the root, without crease on the lower wing on the outer edge of the green :) retreat only at the top edge.
Comibaena tenuisaria:
http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=85465
This is an increase from mobiola http://fotki.yandex.ru/next/users/bianor/album/155100/view/436672
differences: in. kr.white sash, sharply broken at the top
On the lower wing of the "green" and departs from the top and from the bottom on the outer edge.

13.07.2014 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sitochroa verticalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 16:05, Shamil Murtazin:

and the story of the shooting was that the object was a tall ... standing on tiptoe.
in a toga, when he wanted to move - a butterfly flew away.

13.07.2014 15:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander, I agree that this site and on the other it is not guided. And viewed here http://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42aosyaku.html where pictures of the subfamily Geometrinae
With regard Comibaena tenuisaria, I can not see Googl, I found nothing. If you do not throw hard link

13.07.2014 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, not Udea lutealis. :)

13.07.2014 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Comibaena tenuisaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, if you looked at http://lepidoptera.ru, there probably mistake it Comibaena tenuisaria, C. amoenaria other sites looks quite different.

13.07.2014 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

In my opinion, there is an error determination is Comibaena tenuisaria. I would like to know the opinion of Tatyana.

13.07.2014 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis heparana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis heparana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis heparana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.07.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

With these angles, really hard, flat leaf rollers, it is desirable to remove the top, the side that does not seen. :)

13.07.2014 14:49, Shamil Murtazin:

I know ... no :(

13.07.2014 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That is to accurately determine the underside pirgusov very desirable in my opinion :) Have?

13.07.2014 14:27, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion it Comibaena amoenaria

13.07.2014 13:32, Shamil Murtazin:

This not mastered = (

13.07.2014 13:16, Shamil Murtazin:

there are also doubts ... some it is whitish or something ...

13.07.2014 12:47, Shamil Murtazin:

Please see the definition of ...
spot in the middle cell is not like

13.07.2014 10:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis canace / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.07.2014 4:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergei Kotov.

13.07.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

13.07.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergei Kotov.

13.07.2014 4:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergei Kotov.

13.07.2014 4:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergei Kotov.

13.07.2014 4:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Sergei Kotov.

12.07.2014 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia subfuscata / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

12.07.2014 23:49, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

12.07.2014 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immutata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

12.07.2014 23:43, Basil Sergienko:

Scopula immutata

12.07.2014 23:41, Peter Khramov:

Fixed. This glitch happens sometimes. I fly globally when I get back. A copper-butterfly meanwhile removed from the places where they were not supposed to be.

12.07.2014 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis niobe / Simon Coombes Argynnis adippe / Alexsandr Martukov.

12.07.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

12.07.2014 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

12.07.2014 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parascotia fuliginaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.07.2014 21:35, Alexsandr Martukov:

Argynnis adippe (sharp wings, wells, large bright pearl spot)

12.07.2014 19:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.07.2014 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

12.07.2014 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Mihail Nyzhnikov.

12.07.2014 17:54, Andrei Komrakov:

A) All I kerf, which made a mistake - I is not putting the name of the boot, trying to insert when editing on your page. Now everything is clear..))

12.07.2014 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macaria signaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

12.07.2014 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochropacha duplaris / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.07.2014 17:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Photo by species name is not in the column written.

12.07.2014 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea biselata / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

12.07.2014 17:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

12.07.2014 15:40, Mihail Nyzhnikov:

I suspect that this CELASTRINA ARGIOLUS L.

12.07.2014 10:50, Basil Sergienko:

Macaria signaria

12.07.2014 10:48, Basil Sergienko:

Scopula nigropunctata

12.07.2014 10:47, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea biselata-like image is already

12.07.2014 6:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In fact, everything is simple: type in a search engine site the genus Neptis, and then look for the species. Find the right, open it and download from a page type your photo and then it will fall right. A determinant, yes, ochepyatka, however :)

12.07.2014 5:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, the name took to the insects of Russian Far East Tom5, ch. 5, page 297. Apparently there is a typo

12.07.2014 3:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, spelled correctly tschetverikovi. Because of the missing letter "C" in writing the specific name and photo were for moderation.

12.07.2014 3:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Mihail Nyzhnikov Not identified.

12.07.2014 3:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not write anything at startup if the type is undefined.

12.07.2014 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I repeat: do not write anything in the "Specification of the classification of" not related to the subject line (the species name was not applicable). The definition is written in the form of a comment.

12.07.2014 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

11.07.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Svetlana Shchavelina Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.07.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:)

11.07.2014 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is when transferring a piece of geography that goes up quotes. And the very fact that since the quotes have to restore later. Do not gud (

11.07.2014 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Basil, what the thread to do, apparently, after the return. Hence in the best case the thread to the gallery gruzanu. And then, for the sake of greater technology.

11.07.2014 19:19, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Basil definition - yours, my contribution to this there :)

11.07.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dindica alaopis / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

11.07.2014 16:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis tshetverikovi

11.07.2014 16:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis tshetverikovi

11.07.2014 13:05, Svetlana Shchavelina:

This Dindica alaopis trailers, pliz, because it is one with the butterfly # 30066

11.07.2014 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.07.2014 5:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Uploaded copper-butterfly, and for some reason it has registered in addition to all the latest updates

11.07.2014 5:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Female

11.07.2014 1:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pasiphila rectangulata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

11.07.2014 0:25, Basil Sergienko:

Pasiphila rectangulata

11.07.2014 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not necessary to write sexual identity in the "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age" as it does not relate to the subject field. Just a comment to a photo. Why once again to move the moderators to edit this field? Honestly it's too much :)

10.07.2014 23:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The view of my personal observations, of which became very rare in the usual Moscow and the border areas: its very intensively replace us in recent years, coming from the southHyponephele lycaon, we becoming so massive that "oxen eye" on his background and is not visible almost .... Everything changes, time goes ...

10.07.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I decided to straighten one for clarity ...

10.07.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chloroclystis v-ata ?

10.07.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euplexia lucipara / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

10.07.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euplexia lucipara / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

10.07.2014 21:49, Basil Sergienko:

Euplexia lucipara

10.07.2014 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Euglyphis marna / Enio Branco.

10.07.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.07.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.07.2014 11:21, Shamil Murtazin:

pussy like that ... it's a camouflage for mold or fungus? ))

10.07.2014 9:34, Andrei Komrakov:

Instead Udea lutealis?

10.07.2014 3:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Buck

10.07.2014 2:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Buck

10.07.2014 1:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zavedёn genus and species (validity). MOVED according to the author's comments.

10.07.2014 1:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zelica thalassina / Confidently identified / Enio Branco.

10.07.2014 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Believe it or not, but for the first time this ognёvku caught ..... You can say lucky :)

10.07.2014 0:04, Enio Branco:

(Notodontidae) *

10.07.2014 0:02, Enio Branco:

Trichomoplata cassiope *

10.07.2014 0:01, Enio Branco: This species is identified correctly.

09.07.2014 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it's not for you, but to another Moder. This bug sits long and well, and it is necessary to do something. Himself repeatedly danced with the tambourine :)

09.07.2014 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Like as it made write without ssp. In most cases any :) surrounding ssp. (It is also an option).

09.07.2014 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For that I love the scoop? Behind her an unusual variation, of course :)

09.07.2014 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Or ssp. sulphurea, or E. l. sulphurea. Indeed variant ssp most preferred because plus other noticeable then it will be easier to keep track of software foty with subspecies and transfer them to a subspecies, not just species.

09.07.2014 22:36, Alexsandr Martukov:

Yes, I knew, but forgot about quotes

09.07.2014 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of harm's way :(

09.07.2014 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cnephasia asseclana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

09.07.2014 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cnephasia asseclana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

09.07.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, take note: better to write the name of the subspecies as a whole. Thus: Euthrix laeta sulphurea (Aurivillius, 1895)

09.07.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2014 19:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that's clear. Vlad inclined to trust on 100 :)

09.07.2014 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

09.07.2014 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eana incanana / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

09.07.2014 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To expose to the forum on "whoever fire" :)

09.07.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2014 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.07.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2014 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2014 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.07.2014 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So powerful glucan (
Alexander Please note: if the label has quotation marks, because when you transfer them to cut the geography and you have to correct.

09.07.2014 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 14:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 14:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

09.07.2014 14:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lampropteryx suffumata / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

09.07.2014 14:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea serpentata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.07.2014 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cook, but there can certainly special. that visually opedelyaei photo. But all wrong, even knowing full well its regional fauna.

09.07.2014 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odezia atrata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.07.2014 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Odezia atrata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.07.2014 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another "Question on filling" :) Pipe business?

09.07.2014 9:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, it Euthrix laeta.

09.07.2014 8:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix laeta / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

09.07.2014 6:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Like the previous picture would not be tied to specific individuals Photo # 31276: Euthrix laeta

09.07.2014 6:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Euthrix laeta

09.07.2014 5:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Apparently future male and female. I do not accidentally do this aktsent.Delo that one of them pupate in a cocoon, and the other will be the usual doll - from which the butterfly will come out first. Will the 2nd from the cocoon is open to question.

09.07.2014 3:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Endotricha flammealis / Zoran Bozovic Plagodis dolabraria / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.07.2014 3:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

What kind of nonsense is Moth now see what kind of, I know but do not remember the name.

08.07.2014 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It ognёvka, sorry, did not wake up, when I wrote the first to comment :)

08.07.2014 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

IHoplodrina octogenariait. It is necessary that someone else wrote.

08.07.2014 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote pygarga / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.07.2014 1:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Basil. I fully agree with your opinion. Ideally should .byt pictures taken in nature and images of the same individual in the expanded form. So it will be clearer. What and try as much as possible to combine.

08.07.2014 1:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, a wide effort :) See straightened butterflies appear in your gallery. It is very necessary for my Peer site. After all, much easier to collection materials will determine in the future, rather than on a photo in nature. Keep it up :) Well, and full-scale photos are also needed, of course :)

07.07.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis thisbe / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.07.2014 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By law, the first conjecture, which in fact turned out to be the best definition, the definition put Irina :)

07.07.2014 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

:)

07.07.2014 19:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sorry, Vasily, I wanted to say Vitali :)

07.07.2014 19:25, Yuri Semejkin:

There are butterfly Neptis thisbe

07.07.2014 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Of course I did not. I generally run from the Far East as the fire aberration :) But it's not like the color. I write your guesses at the adjacent, so the same picture :) I think the discussion can be closed without continuation :)

07.07.2014 16:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Color does not matter, drawing the same. The definition is correct, and I do not think this determines Basil.

07.07.2014 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

It Scythris .po photo views did not identify.

07.07.2014 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

07.07.2014 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

07.07.2014 8:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Complex in terms of movement. For tourists the money CUC = 1 EUR. With gasoline in the country was napryazhenka. All of this can be read on the forums independent puteschestvennikov (Tipo Vinsky).

06.07.2014 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Although ... It is necessary in my opinion based on the shooting date to think that it's just film cameras so distorted the colors :)

06.07.2014 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And this is also another kind? Or variability of such supernatural?

06.07.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Little sense in the Far East, but in my opinion it is the male of another species?

06.07.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.07.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.07.2014 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Already arrived. With zero result. Probably not taken off yet: I will go later. The point where the iron for this species. I do not lose heart :)

06.07.2014 21:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Good luck! =)

06.07.2014 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euclidia mi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.07.2014 11:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Alexandr Zhakov.

06.07.2014 11:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Alexandr Zhakov.

06.07.2014 6:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who is going to her specifically, on the very cutting. Find it-would be nice .......
Wish good luck :)

06.07.2014 5:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It has already become: Mangina argus (Kollar, [1847])

06.07.2014 5:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.07.2014 5:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.07.2014 22:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cucullia lanceolata / Ivan Stogov Cucullia lychnitis / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.07.2014 20:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.07.2014 20:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phymatopus hecta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.07.2014 20:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phymatopus hecta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.07.2014 20:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthorhoe montanata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.07.2014 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Idaea serpentata / Confidently identified / Female / Basil Sergienko.

05.07.2014 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis semifasciana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.07.2014 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis semifasciana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.07.2014 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis semifasciana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.07.2014 19:51, Eddy Verfaillie:

Phymatopus hecta. *

05.07.2014 19:50, Eddy Verfaillie:

For me, it is Phymatopus hecta. *

05.07.2014 19:42, Basil Sergienko:

Phymatopus hecta

05.07.2014 19:37, Basil Sergienko:

Pseudestrotia candidula

05.07.2014 19:33, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea serpentata-fm

05.07.2014 19:30, Basil Sergienko:

Xanthorhoe montanata

05.07.2014 18:20, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

05.07.2014 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Opredkelenie type: VV Dubatolov.

05.07.2014 16:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Au ......................

05.07.2014 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea biselata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.07.2014 15:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Melanargia epimede ?

05.07.2014 14:47, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea biselata

05.07.2014 14:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Butterfly small. With a wingspan of up to 1 cm

05.07.2014 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea aversata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.07.2014 11:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immutata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

05.07.2014 10:58, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea aversata

05.07.2014 10:55, Basil Sergienko:

Immutata

05.07.2014 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It requires confirmation / denial.

05.07.2014 3:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha siderana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.07.2014 3:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I went again, "trouble" with her mass (God forbid that other butterfly flew so well ......

05.07.2014 2:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

2 Alexander. I think there is nothing to refute: 4 tried all kind opportunity for my region and only this approach. In St. Petersburg, species composition, I think not much different :)

05.07.2014 2:56, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha siderana

05.07.2014 2:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha siderana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.07.2014 2:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Celypha siderana / Confidently identified / Male & female / Irina Nikulina.

05.07.2014 2:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha siderana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.07.2014 2:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And no one else to look like one.

05.07.2014 2:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha siderana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.07.2014 2:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.07.2014 2:44, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha siderana?

05.07.2014 2:43, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha siderana ?

05.07.2014 2:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But not one that is on the website and on this: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Scopula_Corrivalaria
The site may not have it.

05.07.2014 2:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula corrivalaria? Very similar.

05.07.2014 2:40, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha siderana?

05.07.2014 2:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sopula corrivalaria ?

05.07.2014 2:38, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha siderana?

05.07.2014 2:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

IScopula floslactata

05.07.2014 2:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aleimma loeflingiana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.07.2014 2:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aleimma loeflingiana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.07.2014 2:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rhode Aphelia, kind of? European yellow paleana, unitana and stigmatana. What do you have?

05.07.2014 2:31, Irina Nikulina:

Aleimma loeflingiana?

05.07.2014 2:30, Irina Nikulina:

Aleimma loeflingiana?

05.07.2014 2:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.07.2014 2:07, Peter Khramov:

Good.

05.07.2014 1:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

05.07.2014 1:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.07.2014 1:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.07.2014 1:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.07.2014 1:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

05.07.2014 0:23, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

05.07.2014 0:23, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

05.07.2014 0:23, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

05.07.2014 0:22, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male and female

05.07.2014 0:15, Alexsandr Martukov:

Without underside ... may still leave not quite accurate?

04.07.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"T" on the keyboard sinks: course "catch" :)

04.07.2014 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It should be tin and spread.

04.07.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis niobe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

04.07.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let it be niobium. Without underside.

04.07.2014 22:29, Alexsandr Martukov:

Aglaya upper ends of the wings sharper (visual comparison) ...

04.07.2014 22:27, Alexsandr Martukov:

Argynnis niobe

04.07.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea cinxia Melitaea phoebe.

04.07.2014 22:19, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea phoebe

04.07.2014 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis aglajaI think female. The underside is hard without (

04.07.2014 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first generation.

04.07.2014 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation.

04.07.2014 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first generation.

04.07.2014 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first generation.

04.07.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first generation.

04.07.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation.

04.07.2014 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first generation.

04.07.2014 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first generation.

04.07.2014 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation.

04.07.2014 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Ivan Stogov.

04.07.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nevertheless (technically) expose determine the correct :)
Anatoly, thanks for the comment :)

04.07.2014 19:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why did you come to that definition?
1. Cucullia lanceolata for Russia is not given.
2. The caterpillar does not look like a caterpillar Cucullia lanceolata, rather pale Cucullia lychnitis.

04.07.2014 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"The control copy." to distinguish from the other two species possible in the region of 8 species:Selenia tetralunariaandSelenia lunularia: Selenia dentaria (Fabricius, 1775) are different from the absence of the so-called "lunchatyh spots" on the upper side of the wings :)

04.07.2014 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Udea lutealis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.07.2014 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Nemophora metallica / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.07.2014 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Perizoma alchemillata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.07.2014 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea cinxia / Tentatively identified Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified.

04.07.2014 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.07.2014 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea cinxia Melitaea phoebe.

04.07.2014 10:20, Basil Sergienko:

Perizoma alchemillata

04.07.2014 10:18, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea phoebe

04.07.2014 10:18, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea phoebe

04.07.2014 6:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved until inaccurate.

04.07.2014 6:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

03.07.2014 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.07.2014 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.07.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.07.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.07.2014 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.07.2014 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

03.07.2014 16:04, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

03.07.2014 16:03, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

03.07.2014 16:02, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

03.07.2014 16:02, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

03.07.2014 16:01, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

03.07.2014 16:01, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male and female

03.07.2014 13:26, Ruslan Salmanov:

Dmitry many thanks for your help! Now, if only the weather did not let us down :) In what way Cuba is difficult to catch? What are more interesting places you recommend?

03.07.2014 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.07.2014 11:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I just have to have these pictures of seven of our species and this in my opinion is best suited. We must catch: it is you are right :)

03.07.2014 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

They all look like :) Collect more, give me one who cooks, you will know exactly who is flying on the balcony :)

03.07.2014 11:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Naturally, I do not cook. Let be inaccurate. Just does not seem to see all of my region to lead ..

03.07.2014 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

If the butterflies are not Varena in Cnephasia error in most cases more than 50%

03.07.2014 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

03.07.2014 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Celypha lacunana / Vasiliy Feoktistov Gypsonoma minutana / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.07.2014 10:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Gypsonoma minutana, I think so, but it is better to inaccurate

03.07.2014 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow, if you need to let down the original, but it is a little different. Also puzzling :-)

03.07.2014 10:48, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

03.07.2014 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily I cry with emotion :), it's something else. I'll try to find, in spite of the view and edit photos. Almost even know. :)

03.07.2014 10:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

I have serious doubts about the correctness of the determination, I am inclined toPandemis cerasana

03.07.2014 10:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Selenia dentaria / Zoran Bozovic Selenia lunularia / Basil Sergienko.

03.07.2014 10:10, Basil Sergienko:

lunularia

03.07.2014 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not dentaria IMHO tetralunaria. Today I have no time to look: I suggest to understand.

03.07.2014 5:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Selenia tetralunaria Selenia dentaria.

03.07.2014 5:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not take long ....

03.07.2014 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Selenia tetralunaria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.07.2014 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.07.2014 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tortured look and no one else came to mind ...

02.07.2014 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Igor Sakhno Andrei Komrakov.

02.07.2014 18:00, Igor Sakhno:

Determined Andrew Komrakov

02.07.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.07.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

02.07.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

02.07.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.07.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 15:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.07.2014 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.07.2014 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chloroclystis v-ata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

02.07.2014 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Near the house there is heather, though :) And the times .... We will consider the best :)

02.07.2014 13:35, Basil Sergienko:

Chloroclystis v-ata

02.07.2014 13:34, Basil Sergienko:

Like, yes, although there are double goossensiata, which flies a bit later and lives on the heather. Mironov (GME 4) considered them synonymous, but now kind of different kinds.

02.07.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With this deal, too, will be superfluous :)

02.07.2014 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cnephasia asseclana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.07.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mythimna albipuncta / Vasiliy Feoktistov Mythimna ferrago / Basil Sergienko.

02.07.2014 10:56, Basil Sergienko:

It ferrago

01.07.2014 23:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Basil Sergienko.

01.07.2014 22:12, Peter Khramov:

It will be ready - always will provide. By Malaise - not all just butterflies interesuyutstsa; -))

01.07.2014 21:13, Alex Dumchus:

But who needs it, Malese entot ?? .Nechto Like from scrap materials is in my dvore.Iz butterflies for the whole season, except for small scoop and moths (which I do not collect) only three rural-bear. And all the rest is leafhoppers, Diptera, especially komary- in large quantities. So thank you, I post, please, the one that promised :)

01.07.2014 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.07.2014 19:51, Basil Sergienko: This species is identified correctly.

01.07.2014 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Hopefully, no more: -)
Traps have, but I have a suspicion that it is necessary to design dotachivat not fully satisfied, I do, and therefore do not propose to the test. Although Malaise can probably send. Alexander, Malese need?

01.07.2014 14:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

On the way to the sea Zapata will greyfrutovyh and orange orchards. There will Papilio andraemon, Papilio androgeus epidaurus and, if very lucky - Parides gundlachianus gundlachianus

01.07.2014 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put until inaccurate. I really hope for confirmation or refutation.

01.07.2014 5:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Female / Alexsandr Martukov.

01.07.2014 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Female / Alexsandr Martukov.

01.07.2014 0:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sing! Respect for the box. Esche- will all take away.)))

01.07.2014 0:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And yes! NEOBHADIMO know the simplest expression in Spanish. English in the province do not trust, I saw two Russian-speaking people. (To Varadero is not treated)

01.07.2014 0:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If you are a start in the caves varadero- Drive to Muslims on the bus. there in the forest. it was full of the territory of the bait! be careful! 25 kinds of day a few days typed. By the mangroves do not go away, closer to kardenasskomu birite Bay (right of way).The mangroves are many blues (about 10 species, but hard to catch) in the caves tolstogolovok 10 species, including the hefty, but the terms of cacti, including trees, cactus and cactus creeper. Two types of Danaides, 2 types of sailboats (TOAC, battus) types 6, whiteflies, Nymphalidae. Many cockroaches, mantises and stick insects. Also, there are many Elena kolibri-.

01.07.2014 0:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

general cube difficult to catch. There are places much better and more interesting

01.07.2014 0:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, it is Zapata. The park itself is not necessary to climb. Palatochku, generotor. Chasseurs a lot, but money talks, I think. But do not light up. Dangerous animals there. Crocodiles almost gone. Poisonous snakes there. Many tarantulas and scorpions. Day three floors, then along the coast of the Caribbean Sea. It will take all day is banal.For endemic sailboats to travel to Guantanamo Olgin-. But I was not there, I can not say anything.

30.06.2014 23:21, Alexsandr Martukov:

female

30.06.2014 23:20, Alexsandr Martukov:

Polyommatus icarus - female

30.06.2014 23:20, Alexsandr Martukov:

Polyommatus icarus

30.06.2014 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aplocera plagiata / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

30.06.2014 23:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.06.2014 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.06.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.06.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.06.2014 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.06.2014 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.06.2014 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.06.2014 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.06.2014 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.06.2014 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Perconia strigillaria / Confidently identified / Male / Basil Sergienko.

30.06.2014 22:17, Basil Sergienko:

I think-Perconia strigillaria

30.06.2014 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Lasiocampidae day," I have today :)
One day just two types hatched.
Unfortunately no photos caterpillars and pupae that the females Herbal lasiocampidae: I did not photograph them in mind the usual form.

30.06.2014 21:51, Ruslan Salmanov:

Dmitry I realized this area "Parque Nacional Cienaga de Zapata". There free access or hard to get? Do rangers and strictly protected there?

30.06.2014 21:28, Ruslan Salmanov:

Dmitry thank you for the comprehensive answer! After fishing in Sri Lanka you have pleased me, there is a contingent of really lousy.

30.06.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very often I need a ispod to define "chervonetz" and "blues" (Lycaenidae). Just ask to have it in mind :)

30.06.2014 21:19, Alex Dumchus:

Peter really coming autumn and traps all there!

30.06.2014 19:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

kube- of summer is not the most opportune time. often hurricanes. everything will depend on the weather. Local naseleniyu- drum. only one can start to beg for money. tour places beg more, dikih- less. movement in the country is not easy. I advise you to check out the tour forums. Gasoline buy the problem, and a generator too.Catch Landmarks Maneadero, Palpa. Closer to the swamps. There is good and night. You can even take out Castro.

30.06.2014 18:57, Ruslan Salmanov:

Food 22.07.2014g. Particularly interesting lepidoptera, more interesting day. Night is also interesting, but not so. Also interesting beetles. As the local population refers to a person with a net (if you accidentally get caught the eye)? As is the case with the export? What advise space gear?

30.06.2014 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My assumptions about what will come true male 100% appears and the caterpillar can guess the sex of adults intuitively :)

30.06.2014 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That comma was indeed neither here not there :)

30.06.2014 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

30.06.2014 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

30.06.2014 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

30.06.2014 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

30.06.2014 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I reckon Lycaena phlaeas female.

30.06.2014 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia artaxerxes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.06.2014 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

artaxerxes I see it now. Penrenoshu :)

30.06.2014 8:27, Andrei Komrakov:

I beg your pardon - only now noticed that without place to place - all corrected ..)

30.06.2014 6:08, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Shamil, sadly no any. Was quick to fly off.(

30.06.2014 2:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In Altai should look.

30.06.2014 0:45, Igor Sakhno:

Perhaps, again Aplocera plagiata

30.06.2014 0:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes. If there are any other things there :)

30.06.2014 0:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula ornata ?

30.06.2014 0:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

But it could be something Asian, then I apologize :)

30.06.2014 0:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pleurota pyropella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.06.2014 0:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula tessellaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.06.2014 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In humans, all photos from Lotoshinskogo area.
And so, yes, without a photo of geography and the date is the same as bad as collector's copy. without the main (geographical) labels. Andrew, Alexander supported the comments. In this case, you have to be punctual :-)

30.06.2014 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Nemophora congruella / Tentatively identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.06.2014 0:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha pamphilus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.06.2014 0:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

the phone, I just look too :)

30.06.2014 0:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sylvanus means :-) Thanks.

30.06.2014 0:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Location photography is desirable to specify at least the area.

30.06.2014 0:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eana argentana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.06.2014 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I too now looked at Boldyrev site and also think that it is on the underside, but the phone is not risk on such a verdict is issued. So wait till tomorrow ... oh, it is now: in the daily work time is confused. Costs profession :)

30.06.2014 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.06.2014 0:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

30.06.2014 0:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) I agree with Irina, but the share of doubt is, these types better with the two sides, known habitat and believe that the two species. :)

30.06.2014 0:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

So many similar and in this perspective, unfortunately, the only way.

29.06.2014 23:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmopterix schmidiella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.06.2014 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. OrOchlodes sylvanusalso female? This in my opinion is less likely. I am now hard to announce the verdict accurate and so I want to ask her checked anyone.

29.06.2014 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hesperia commafemale?

29.06.2014 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let tomorrow Powys if Alexander does not appear (usually at night lately it happens). Just can not check up tomorrow :-(

29.06.2014 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chiasmia clathrata / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

29.06.2014 22:18, Irina Nikulina:

Aricia artaxerxes, I think

29.06.2014 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chiasmia clathrata / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

29.06.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only just endured and that to the same post. It is :-)

29.06.2014 22:15, Shamil Murtazin:

crop would be more tightly ...

29.06.2014 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumedonia eumedon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.06.2014 22:13, Shamil Murtazin:

That's what kind of tired ... read do not like something, and the "neck" ... :))) It is necessary to go to sleep)

29.06.2014 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.06.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote bankiana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.06.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chiasmia clathrata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.06.2014 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Chiasmia clathrata

29.06.2014 21:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In Cuba, more specific information. Month, types, methods - that are interested.

29.06.2014 21:43, Irina Nikulina:

Aphantopus hyperantus

29.06.2014 21:38, Irina Nikulina:

Eumedonia eumedon

29.06.2014 21:37, Irina Nikulina:

Deltote bankiana

29.06.2014 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euclidia mi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.06.2014 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if "T" stand for ... zachit :-)

29.06.2014 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, well suited))

29.06.2014 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Fixing the posts for an hour, we introduce. I have a few months heavily overloaded with time, so it is I brake, but the recording is, and all will be! : -)) With regards to the day in the LC - within days modernizing often have themselves put down view, and the next day the new foty loaded, so wait for hours until the user fix or not fix - irrationally.An hour wait can be, people loaded, immediately noticed the error - corrected. I did not notice for an hour - will correct a moderator.

29.06.2014 12:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Yeah, it would be nice. And why l / k typos can be corrected within the hour. At least during the day.

29.06.2014 11:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Here at a butterfly wing with the letter T must be taken for the alphabet :)

29.06.2014 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Text can only be corrected Peter. Dreams: it is time to introduce self-edit their posts by the users :-)

29.06.2014 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Comostola subtiliaria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.06.2014 9:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Typo. Define: Vasilenko SI, it is necessary to fix Vasilenko SV

29.06.2014 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chiasmia clathrataseems :-)

29.06.2014 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Euclidia milikely. Himself today its determination will not endure. Only the phone and I can not check, alas (

29.06.2014 8:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Shamil, I do not know what to answer you. One instance that you're talking about, and this was determined by specialists of moths which they are engaged.

29.06.2014 8:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, in our catalog on page copy of the form is almost white.
It's a sexual dimorphism, or a copy of polёtanny?

29.06.2014 8:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Malinellus - yes ... I do not even doubt. Forces did not have to write :)
But with photo gusyanok - deceived. It turns out did not do photos for the city. Fotkal only chalet copies. And I lay them separately.

29.06.2014 8:14, Shamil Murtazin:

I like it :) coloring their pupae

29.06.2014 8:12, Shamil Murtazin:

Victor, any underside pics?.. can be even not clear (just give a link).

29.06.2014 8:11, Shamil Murtazin:

Wow ... these "palps" once-a mustache for antennki work or is it a purely "mouthparts"?

29.06.2014 8:08, Shamil Murtazin:

I assumeChiasmia clathrata

29.06.2014 8:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Comostola subtiliaria (Bremer, 1864). Define: Vasilenko SI Inst-here Systematics and Ecology of Animals.

29.06.2014 5:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you. I can not imagine himself her "missed" :)

29.06.2014 0:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya salicella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.06.2014 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Dime, you're kind of was not so long ago, someone tell me ...

28.06.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xenochroa mediogrisea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2014 21:45, Ruslan Salmanov:

I'm going to go to Cuba, prompt as it is the case with catching insects?

28.06.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That helped collectible. This is me with the background all the experimenting :)

28.06.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This way, I can not identify yourself :) Perspective side is there, but it turned out disgusting and I do not want to put unnecessarily, but if it is there: give :)

28.06.2014 17:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil. Well, you're like the first time. Naturally you put your definition, it is the individual that Ms.

28.06.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.06.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.06.2014 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immutata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2014 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immutata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2014 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it means I was right with the adjacent photo where she is the top :)

28.06.2014 16:25, Basil Sergienko:

immutata-female

28.06.2014 16:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And on a black background are better :) What do you think? Today, perhaps change some way :)

28.06.2014 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

5 species in our region, more precisely. And the closest thing to it in common colorAnacampsis timidellabut me your variants, too close for the soul :)

28.06.2014 15:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are a number of closely related species, and they are painting in common, so it's better pobudet :)

28.06.2014 15:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can my and accurate: just beaten it several life :)

28.06.2014 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis populella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.06.2014 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula immutata? Or someone close?

28.06.2014 15:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you :) I'll photograph collection from two angles, as the fresh catch (the old do not want to put).
In July, we have to fly :)

28.06.2014 15:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.06.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

The original photograph was determined that instance Feoktistov, Yuri have a definition that is not suffered :) Actually an interesting question, torment, you have more confidence in each other, and when it detects connections not consulted, and that is really a memoir writing :)

28.06.2014 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2014 14:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well tady pipe business ..........

28.06.2014 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil is geleheida, why bother :)

28.06.2014 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I bet whose definition? :)

28.06.2014 14:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Lymantria dispar

28.06.2014 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I am to blame, of course, because I repent and :)

28.06.2014 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A vague assumption is notPelosia obtusaDoes this hour? I can not stand that something embarrassing in it. I do not understand that :)

28.06.2014 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

28.06.2014 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey is guilty, it is clear :)))

28.06.2014 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.06.2014 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.06.2014 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my opinion it is :)

28.06.2014 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.06.2014 14:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

28.06.2014 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apple then :) Well then, the first assumptionYponomeuta malinellusIn my region, it is only on the apple like. Yes, and it is your area of ​​Sinev :)

28.06.2014 14:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Please see the definition.
For quality sorry. What was, and the shot: D

28.06.2014 14:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Frightened, I did not write.
But wrote Ranetka-wildings. The fine was. All the trees are eaten to the state "stems instead of leaves."
Lay necessarily gusyanok pictures. This pack has laid out so as not to forget.

28.06.2014 14:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, probably yes. In males, from a previously recorded I only have one shot and then zatёrty.
Other species are not suitable.

28.06.2014 14:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasilyev, endure, there are other types are quite different.

28.06.2014 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Neparnik :)Lymantria disparmale. Wait until the carry, Yuri: it was too difficult for me to your region. Although confident of 90%

28.06.2014 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Returned definition. I confess, I did not consider the entire discussion. As soon begin with the first to comment on it and finish. Then Andrei comments should be overwriting that I introduced last misleading :)

28.06.2014 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vlad Proklov Alexandr Zhakov.

28.06.2014 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vlad Proklov Alexandr Zhakov.

28.06.2014 12:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

It was initially identified as Elegia similella

28.06.2014 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Female / Shamil Murtazin.

28.06.2014 12:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena helle / Confidently identified / Female / Shamil Murtazin.

28.06.2014 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The caterpillars that ate? The fact that the species of this genus have a certain predisposition to certain species / genera of plants. And infa food plants can help to identify.

28.06.2014 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, did not know. Just look not writing anything lately.

28.06.2014 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here is my unfolding that recently staged and suggested :)

28.06.2014 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Creatonotos transiens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2014 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

The postgraduate scoops :) plow hard, constantly scans the forum. :)

28.06.2014 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only the comma "neither here nor there." How many times wrote to Peter to put away the automation :)

28.06.2014 10:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

no problem :)

28.06.2014 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Molbiol course :) disappeared a long time and people can not see, which is a pity: good sovochnik :)

28.06.2014 10:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

28.06.2014 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, you have to edit this line alone. I suggest to do it :)

28.06.2014 10:26, Irina Nikulina:

I agree, it is better, more is better to specify a particular age if you know him- in appearance) There is likely to 3rd

28.06.2014 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

younger ages :)

28.06.2014 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

All ugly, there is a term indicating the age of the caterpillar II-III age or a young caterpillar that probably better.

28.06.2014 10:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

In this example, as there is, but you yourself wrote that it is necessary to specify the resource definition where there was a reference to the page that there were no issues. If it is determined privately, or insect has got a certain time, only the last name. By the way, two weeks ago, in Odessa region, on the border with Transnistria, with Eugene caught the light :)

28.06.2014 10:06, Irina Nikulina:

I think the author wanted to say that this track does not reach the last age. Literally - "not fully grown up" (not ripe). "Immature" is not that a little bit, I think

28.06.2014 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way I can try to replace the photo of it. True debate this "sink into oblivion" automatically. Make?

28.06.2014 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Second generation. Boris, a number of "hunting" but: Volginsky Omutisch from 6 km. "with a tail", but in a straight line :) And my lytrii of those edges.

28.06.2014 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I added just in case your version of the list of host plants. Goose something pretty Polyphagous :)

28.06.2014 7:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite aSpilosoma lutea?
Several embarrassing fodder plant (such as cornflower meadow in the list are not included).
I'll wait until I will not tolerate.

28.06.2014 7:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apparently this author wanted to say. I think in the Russian version will look better.
Please write verbatim: "immature", but then beat in a more digestible version :)

28.06.2014 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.06.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.06.2014 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here is an example of the way and ran out :)
How to write the definition if it is determined not in the list of authors.

28.06.2014 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is very zameno how it differs fromSideridis reticulata
Indeed only the blind do not make out :)

28.06.2014 1:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Doubts must always be moved :) Five photographs of this kind today :)

28.06.2014 1:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea athalia / Tentatively identified Melitaea diamina / Confidently identified.

28.06.2014 1:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

quickly :))

28.06.2014 1:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.06.2014 1:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

28.06.2014 1:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.06.2014 1:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea athalia / Alexsandr Martukov Melitaea diamina / Eugene Karolinskiy.

28.06.2014 1:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, so be it :) And doubts can only be minimal: I have the whole yard in a birch :)

28.06.2014 1:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

diamina

28.06.2014 1:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil will let both options, to me, more like it did not work, no color distortion, a pale copy, but virtually no questions.

28.06.2014 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ortholepis betulae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.06.2014 0:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

And on the underside - is not black dots like diamines orange circled?

28.06.2014 0:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leg. My. Yesterday, at home :)

28.06.2014 0:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

A leg. What? There really is better seen.

28.06.2014 0:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What is not visible? Uploaded dublika without edition (only crop) Just for fun :)

27.06.2014 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphantopus hyperantus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2014 23:49, Irina Nikulina:

Aphantopus hyperantus

27.06.2014 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis heparana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis heparana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura diversana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips crataegana / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 20:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips crataegana / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 19:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euchoeca nebulata / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2014 19:42, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

27.06.2014 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gillmeria pallidactyla / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

27.06.2014 19:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gillmeria pallidactyla / Confidently identified / Alex Lender.

27.06.2014 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha striana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha striana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 19:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

This double photo # 1947 you can safely clean.

27.06.2014 19:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ortholepis betulae / Vitaly Gumenuk Zophodia grossulariella / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 19:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ortholepis betulae / Vitaly Gumenuk Zophodia grossulariella / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 19:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ortholepis betulae / Vitaly Gumenuk Zophodia grossulariella / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 18:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

This double photo # 1947 you can safely clean.

27.06.2014 18:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

It was initially identified as Elegia similella, Vasily more colleagues trust is necessary. :)

27.06.2014 18:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not correct definition and two photos of the same butterflies, I try to find, but here, too, at an altitude of editing :)

27.06.2014 18:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maybe, but too refined in the editor, or anything that is not visible :)

27.06.2014 18:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ortholepis betulae / Dmitriy Pozhogin Assara terebrella / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 18:33, Irina Nikulina:

Top only I saw a butterfly opened its wings for a moment looked over, as there http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Euchoeca_Nebulata. And underside very characteristic, I doubt minimal, but I hope to specialists.

27.06.2014 18:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ortholepis betulae / Vitaly Gumenuk Apomyelois bistriatella / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 18:18, Alex Lender:

Gillmeria pallidactyla?

27.06.2014 18:17, Alex Lender:

Gillmeria pallidactyla?

27.06.2014 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudosciaphila branderiana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 18:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudosciaphila branderiana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.06.2014 14:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm off the phone, I can not fully restore the situation. kind has not been defined or has been defined wrong. Andrew himself to remedy the situation with an indication of the site to identify and where it happened. Peter and I moved the photo.and wherein in a given situation Vlad? You should know that koment to the photo is written at the time the photos and the comments on the page after, and whose word can be seen here recently :))

27.06.2014 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I Add: here I am inclined to trust to the author photo: Andrew always says who he views defined: he is a man very punctual and responsible and I know this from the experience of personal contact, not by hearsay :)

27.06.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very simple notes attached :) Andrew then why? He is slightly taller. Quote: "The comment author: Determination Vlad Proklov."

27.06.2014 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I'm just interested in the way you think :)

27.06.2014 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea aurelia / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2014 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Photos of nature is certainly not to cook :) But if opinions coincided, photo goes inaccurate Aurelia :)

27.06.2014 11:58, Shamil Murtazin:

of course have. I lay out today or tomorrow.

27.06.2014 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

See. Andrei comment.

27.06.2014 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siona lineata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.06.2014 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now I bear. And Lycia zonaria, ponimash ....... :)

27.06.2014 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Siona lineataIMHO wait while endure for fun :)

27.06.2014 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate, because the species is not listed in the Sinev 8 region. Nevertheless, no one comes to mind. I would be happy with any amendments, if any :)

27.06.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vlad Proklov.

27.06.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vlad Proklov.

27.06.2014 7:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And you lay Case consists if you have one, and can be and identify :)

27.06.2014 7:04, Shamil Murtazin:

house is :)
plus more straightened.
in my view only one qualifier specified. but it seems it is not. I will not point to avoid confusion.

27.06.2014 5:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Corrected. Site glucan is not childish (

27.06.2014 5:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2014 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2014 1:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Similar to Aurelius, yes. But without cooking here anywhere.

27.06.2014 1:02, Irina Nikulina:

Both flew photos

27.06.2014 0:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While writing comments, the definition has emerged. And the flight of time they perehlёstyvaetsya. Wait necessary.

27.06.2014 0:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nematopogon metaxella? How about this version? It seems like no one no longer find of our own.

27.06.2014 0:27, Irina Nikulina:

Some of Nematopogon. Comnevayus betweenNematopogon swammerdamellaandNematopogon metaxella

27.06.2014 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, once again flew the geography of the quotes :) Do not get me wrong: it is necessary to repair the engine site ..... or from quotes to give.

27.06.2014 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

27.06.2014 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2014 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incurvaria oehlmanniella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.06.2014 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The train of thought right :)
Time of flight of her coming to our region. Anyway: I agree. I stand.

27.06.2014 0:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil and other angles are?

26.06.2014 23:59, Irina Nikulina:

Incurvaria oehlmanniella ?

26.06.2014 23:57, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkIncurvaria oehlmaniellahttp://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Incurvaria_Oehlmanniella

26.06.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orgyia recens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.06.2014 23:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first photo predstvavitelya of this kind on the site :) so I had the same kind under a new start. Peter, it's time to illustrate the types already :)

26.06.2014 22:47, Irina Nikulina:

This butterfly was smaller than http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30965 underside and less contrast ... zasomnevalas- notMelitaea aureliait? Or, again, athalia?

26.06.2014 21:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.06.2014 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.06.2014 21:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Crambus perlella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.06.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Archips crataegana / Igor Sakhno Archips xylosteana / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.06.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Archips xylosteanait. Also I attacked this rake before :)

26.06.2014 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.06.2014 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.06.2014 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here's Asota sp 3 from Japanese website: http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/03_AGANAINAE/framepage%20aganainae.htm
Also female nearby: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/30949
Asking for help as well here...... Totally stuck(

26.06.2014 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, wrong: the view of the Japanese site like Asota sp 2
Asota sp 3 will also be a bit later :)

26.06.2014 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Kind of a mystery even to the Japanese: http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/03_AGANAINAE/framepage%20aganainae.htm
There she Asota sp 3
The female in the neighborhood: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30943
Just get lost and ask for help in the definition. I can not identify himself in any way, alas (

26.06.2014 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhia umbra / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.06.2014 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhia umbra / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.06.2014 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oligia strigilis / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

26.06.2014 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Correctable :)

26.06.2014 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stenoptilia pterodactyla / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite a fit. Oh, straightened to see :(
I put in yet imprecise, and then time will tell :)

26.06.2014 19:04, Irina Nikulina:

It alsoOligia strigilisThanks for defining Basil Sergienko. (I forgot to combine 2 images in the group)

26.06.2014 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oligia strigilis / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

26.06.2014 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia oleracea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 18:54, Basil Sergienko:

Oligia strigilis

26.06.2014 18:53, Basil Sergienko:

Lacanobia oleracea

26.06.2014 18:27, Irina Nikulina:

Lacanobia oleracea?

26.06.2014 18:00, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Stenoptilia pterodactyla?

26.06.2014 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.06.2014 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gillmeria pallidactyla / Marija Jaunkunga Gillmeria ochrodactyla / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree with Irene: stand.

26.06.2014 17:31, Irina Nikulina:

On legs -Gillmeria ochrodactyla(not a big one, and 3 short dark uch a look at the rear. Feet)

26.06.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia umbratica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I mean :) It is unlikely umbratica.

26.06.2014 16:14, Irina Nikulina:

By Sinev - available in 8 regions (in the book)

26.06.2014 16:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

fraterna , would not like to be with us :)

26.06.2014 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia umbratica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 15:50, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Cucullia umbratica? or fraterna? In kapyushonnitsah not strong)

26.06.2014 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.06.2014 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.06.2014 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cabera exanthemata / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea biselata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.06.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alcis repandata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alcis repandata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.06.2014 11:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More top-would certainly not stop for greater confidence :)
Speaking for the correct definition, but we have to wait until somebody else will tell my opinion.

26.06.2014 11:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliomata glarearia / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

26.06.2014 11:34, Basil Sergienko:

Heliomata glarearia

26.06.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rarely tolstogolovka, big and beautiful. Also a couple of weeks ago gathered "in Flight," and then in the net and looked surprised :)

26.06.2014 11:22, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you) Many years of shooting in these places, met for the first time. As Euchoeca nebulata (if confirmed, she))

26.06.2014 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I am also not sure yet, "what if?" :)
In fact, a serious issue, and I support the proposal of Alexander.
You can make two fields: one (with autosubstitution) to enter the authors, who are on site, and the other to manually enter the initials of people that are not in the list of authors.And with an unfilled at-least one of them to make it impossible to download a photo.
So it is necessary in my view to make the required filling of "technical" fields: date of shooting and geography. It is generally paramount in any case !!!
It's all a dream, of course, but what to do: there is a need in my all to do it :)

26.06.2014 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Victor, good and even necessary to write the geography of the picture :) This is necessary in any case. And especially if the type is undefined.

26.06.2014 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, are you sure that the authors read "Messages"? I do not.
Peter, there is a need to introduce the column "determined" only as the issue will be resolved with the author, if he is not registered on the site, so be black :)))

26.06.2014 9:57, Alexsandr Martukov:

Naturally!)

26.06.2014 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

An accurate determination of Eugene similarly to the first photo in the group.

26.06.2014 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.06.2014 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.06.2014 9:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.06.2014 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea phoebe / Alexsandr Martukov Melitaea athalia / Eugene Karolinskiy.

26.06.2014 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea phoebe / Alexsandr Martukov Melitaea athalia / Eugene Karolinskiy.

26.06.2014 9:36, Alexsandr Martukov:

Just because, there is no point black blots in the root of the wings.

26.06.2014 9:34, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea athalia (unlike Phoebe - the lack of black dots, blots are not present in the root of the wings)

26.06.2014 9:34, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea athalia (unlike Phoebe - the lack of black dots, blots are not present in the root of the wings)

26.06.2014 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MOVED by analogy with the photo, which is in the group.

26.06.2014 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2014 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 5:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2014 5:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2014 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.06.2014 5:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

26.06.2014 5:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cabera pusaria / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.06.2014 5:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

26.06.2014 3:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea phoebe / Alexsandr Martukov Melitaea athalia / Eugene Karolinskiy.

26.06.2014 3:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea cinxia / Alexsandr Martukov Melitaea phoebe / Eugene Karolinskiy.

26.06.2014 3:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha glycerion / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

26.06.2014 3:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, congratulations on the good in our view :)

26.06.2014 3:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Carcharodus floccifera / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

26.06.2014 3:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lasiommata deidamia / Confidently identified / Female / Vladimir Bobow.

26.06.2014 3:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And one alone is not looking. Just need to know the authors, it is necessary to specify the accurate name defined. It is difficult to write the author's name in the comments? To moder noticed and suffered? And no crime :)

26.06.2014 2:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

athalia

26.06.2014 2:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

phoebe

26.06.2014 2:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. glycerion

26.06.2014 2:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. floccifera, male

26.06.2014 2:00, Irina Nikulina:

Carcharodus floccifera? (or alceae?)

26.06.2014 0:43, Irina Nikulina:

Euchoeca nebulata?

26.06.2014 0:40, Irina Nikulina:

Female

26.06.2014 0:40, Irina Nikulina: This species is identified correctly.

26.06.2014 0:26, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea biselata?

26.06.2014 0:25, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula nigropunctata?

26.06.2014 0:22, Irina Nikulina:

Cabera exanthemata?

26.06.2014 0:18, Irina Nikulina:

Cabera pusaria&?

26.06.2014 0:15, Irina Nikulina:

Alcis repandata ?

25.06.2014 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, do not look for crime, where it is not. the authors of the photos do not bother specifying which determined because they are not who does not ask about it. there is no column "opredilit" there is a column "species name" here and write the name yuez malice dropping defined. it is necessary to ask Peter to upload photos when it was possible to indicate the author's definition.but there are certain a reverse process we spread on the other. sites without opredilit too :)))

25.06.2014 9:06, Vladimir Bobow:

Lasiommata deidamia ?

25.06.2014 7:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In recent years can be traced from some users who define butterflies on other sites: Startup photo to give someone else's definition of its own. In particular: to molbiole. Many authors of the site are as the same user molbiola determining where butterflies.Therefore, I have a request: necessarily need to write who and where identified butterfly. If this molbiol in many cases, the moderator has the ability to put the right name. And somehow wrong turns :)

24.06.2014 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Svetlana, and Kwame is said Vladimir. Please write the name of the right to determine.

24.06.2014 23:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Metacrambus carectellus / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

24.06.2014 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Metacrambus carectellus / Confidently identified / Svetlana Karaeva Not identified.

24.06.2014 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, make it a rule to sign you who defined a butterfly on molbiole. Many members of the site and participants are molbiola simultaneously. And moderators on the site in many such cases, has the ability to deliver real name to identify. But at the same time monitor molbiol to correct names: beyond me :)

24.06.2014 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

24.06.2014 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vladimir Bryukhov Ilia Ustiantcev.

24.06.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Monosyntaxis sp. I can not identify. At the Japs, however, I found a well, but there it is undefined (

24.06.2014 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

24.06.2014 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Conistra erythrocephala / Zoran Bozovic Conistra vaccinii / Basil Sergienko.

24.06.2014 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you now decorated :)

23.06.2014 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata / Vitaly Gumenuk Epirrhoe galiata / Basil Sergienko.

23.06.2014 23:46, Basil Sergienko:

It is not Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata, and Epirrhoe galiata

23.06.2014 23:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Trogonoptera brookiana albescens [Rothschild, 1895]

23.06.2014 23:36, Basil Sergienko:

This, and not 26180 as erythrocephala vaccinii

23.06.2014 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's done, Basil thanks for the tip :)
Surely she had determined on the forum (by a sign on it is not the first year) ....

23.06.2014 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Brachylomia viminalis / Nikolai Vladimirov Oligia latruncula / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.06.2014 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Endure, Basil, you're right here :)

23.06.2014 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypena proboscidalis / Petr Khramov Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Basil Sergienko.

23.06.2014 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if notOligia strigilisthen I thinkOligia latruncula? The choice we have (8th district) is small :)
Wrap?

23.06.2014 22:06, Basil Sergienko:

This Oligia sp., But not Brachylomia

23.06.2014 19:18, Basil Sergienko:

It seems like Scotopteryx chenopodiata

23.06.2014 17:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena osterodensis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.06.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia russiae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.06.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia trabealis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.06.2014 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here Klaretta suffering :)

23.06.2014 14:15, Alexsandr Martukov:

:)))

23.06.2014 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I'm just confused :)

23.06.2014 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

23.06.2014 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 13:48, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

23.06.2014 13:45, Alexsandr Martukov:

The upper wings are rounded?

23.06.2014 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.06.2014 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.06.2014 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter stubbornly flies when transferring geography if it contains quotes. Pay attention to it, please.

23.06.2014 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

23.06.2014 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

23.06.2014 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.06.2014 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.06.2014 12:04, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

23.06.2014 12:04, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

23.06.2014 12:00, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male

23.06.2014 12:00, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

23.06.2014 11:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

23.06.2014 11:56, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

23.06.2014 11:56, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

23.06.2014 11:56, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

23.06.2014 11:55, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

23.06.2014 11:54, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

23.06.2014 11:53, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

23.06.2014 11:53, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

23.06.2014 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noctuides melanophia / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.06.2014 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noctuides melanophia / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

23.06.2014 9:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Noctuides melanophia

23.06.2014 9:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Noctuides melanophia

22.06.2014 23:15, Basil Sergienko:

In my opinion, it similis

22.06.2014 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first male with accurate label :)
I wonder what subspecies is to add?
Can someone tell me?

22.06.2014 1:05, Yuri Semejkin:

This caterpillar drag on itself ekskrementy.Na adjacent picture is more grown up, then divided into two parts, is also covered with excrement. A smaller portion (probably a doll) and more empty. Butterfly is already out, threw the spices on the definition of how to answer perekinu here. .

22.06.2014 0:39, Alexsandr Martukov:

Why can not it be britomartis?

21.06.2014 23:41, Maxim Schwarz:

Magically!

21.06.2014 23:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Elophila nymphaeata.

21.06.2014 23:36, Peter Khramov:

Why not look ... This is the photographic four, though not the most is biological ...

21.06.2014 21:43, Shamil Murtazin:

this is a Case consists gusyanka or herself that? ..

21.06.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cepphis advenaria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

21.06.2014 15:35, Basil Sergienko:

Cepphis advenaria

21.06.2014 14:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! Take away that, in spite of it.

21.06.2014 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polypogon tentacularia / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

21.06.2014 13:38, Basil Sergienko:

Polypogon tentacularia

21.06.2014 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yesterday I was already "on edge" stuffed a particularly notable 3 types: Issoria lathonia (Linnaeus, 1758) ; Brenthis daphne (Bergstrasser, 1780) and Argynnis aglaja (Linnaeus, 1758) . Almost all of the "palette" Usually there is species except Argynnis paphia (Linnaeus, 1758) and Argynnis adippe (Denis & Schiffermüller 1775) : this, two apparently more simply too early and will later. You and all the north "is not yet in sight" :)

21.06.2014 5:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A very unusual and large tolstogolovka .....
On a personal note:
View is brought in "Red Book of Moscow Region": 2nd category. View, reduced in numbers. And there, where the couple, according to personal observations-rather uncommon butterfly. Here I agree with KK :)

21.06.2014 2:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Nymphula nymphaeata L. identified the Kirpichnikova VA Gornotaёzhnaya station FEB RAS. Kind determined accurately.

21.06.2014 0:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Efetov rights. Of the proposed diet I have chosen only Vitis amurensis. No wonder it's about grapes sprashival.Spets !!!

20.06.2014 23:44, Alexsandr Martukov:

We (north-east of the Vologda region.) Somehow still perlamutrovok flight is not felt. At the old places they are not.

20.06.2014 23:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

Similar in color specimen from the same habitat. http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30771

20.06.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Believe it or not :) But hotie me in the Vladimir region. (there ekskursiruyu) this season has no Eno is not caught (
Some solid Daphne (kind of not quite peculiar to us) :)
The paradox, however .....

20.06.2014 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rod is right and what to type, there are a dozen of these.

20.06.2014 19:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agapeta zoegana / Igor Sakhno Agapeta hamana / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.06.2014 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya salicella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.06.2014 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya salicella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.06.2014 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

20.06.2014 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

20.06.2014 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

20.06.2014 13:58, Peter Khramov:

Nuuu why this chauvinism, as males and how many females. Make a selection variant "threesome", and will at the same time versatile.

20.06.2014 7:31, Shamil Murtazin:

new tag - two males and one female =)

20.06.2014 2:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Two guys escorted her home ... :)

19.06.2014 8:09, Miran Cvenkel:

mybe Orgyia antiqua *

19.06.2014 7:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arcte modesta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.06.2014 7:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ommatophora luminosa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.06.2014 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea phoebe / Alexsandr Martukov Melitaea diamina / Eugene Karolinskiy.

19.06.2014 1:38, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO most diamine. Just do not Phoebe.

18.06.2014 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Non-flying weather today in Moscow and surrounding areas. That has a season Exotics shipping :) Wildly I apologize for it .....

18.06.2014 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Is determined by the following link: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/03_AGANAINAE/02_Peridrome/Peridrome_subfascia/Peridrome_subfascia.htm

18.06.2014 22:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Peridrome subfascia / Imago / John Moore Peridrome orbicularis / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.06.2014 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peridrome orbicularisis: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/03_AGANAINAE/02_Peridrome/Peridrome_orbicularis/Peridrome_orbicularis.htm I stand.

18.06.2014 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Especially for the site today urgently procured this kind to continue the page :)

18.06.2014 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tyana sp.

18.06.2014 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tyana sp.

18.06.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tyana sp.

18.06.2014 19:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tyana sp.

18.06.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.06.2014 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tyana marina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.06.2014 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio helenus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.06.2014 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Avatha tepescens / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.06.2014 11:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyposidra apiolecua / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.06.2014 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaorhinus rafflesii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.06.2014 9:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hyposidra apioleuca

18.06.2014 9:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tanaorhinus rafflesii

17.06.2014 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, only flies when you transfer your geography.
This is probably because the quotes. We have to re-append (

17.06.2014 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.06.2014 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.06.2014 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

17.06.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupido minimus / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

17.06.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupido minimus / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

17.06.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loxostege sticticalis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

17.06.2014 21:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Cupido minimus

17.06.2014 21:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Loxostege sticticalis?

17.06.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypochrosis binexata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celenna festivaria / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sympis rufibasis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Artena inversa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chorodna pseudobolima / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalanta phalantha / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalanta phalantha / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catopsilia pomona / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catopsilia pomona / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catopsilia pomona / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio helenus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achaea serva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 21:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypochrosis binexata

17.06.2014 21:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Celenna festivaria

17.06.2014 21:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sympis rufibasis

17.06.2014 21:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Artena inversa

17.06.2014 20:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Chorodna pseudobolima

17.06.2014 20:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema

17.06.2014 20:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona

17.06.2014 20:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona

17.06.2014 20:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema

17.06.2014 20:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia

17.06.2014 20:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phalanta phalantha

17.06.2014 20:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phalanta phalantha

17.06.2014 20:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona

17.06.2014 20:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio helenus enganius

17.06.2014 20:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Achaea serva

17.06.2014 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow will deal with it :)

17.06.2014 18:57, Evgeny Komarov:

And: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/serrodes/serrodes_2_8.php

17.06.2014 18:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasily http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Avatha_tepescens_(Noctuidae_Catocalinae)_2.jpg

17.06.2014 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No kind or species can not find in the catalog. Maybe though, I would be born from her now another? Understand need to ......

17.06.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypochrosis pyrrhophaeata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyclene mesilaulinea / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oreta carnea / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macotasa tortricoides / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macotasa tortricoides / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Penicillifera apicalis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hulodes caranea / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mixochlora vittata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaorhinus rafflesii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Artena inversa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

17.06.2014 11:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I suppose Saroba flavipicta

17.06.2014 11:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypochrosis pyrrophaeata

17.06.2014 11:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Avatha tepescens

17.06.2014 11:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lyclene mesilaulinea

17.06.2014 10:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oreta carnea

17.06.2014 10:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Calliteara lairdae???

17.06.2014 10:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Macotasa tortricoides

17.06.2014 10:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Macotasa tortricoides

17.06.2014 10:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The size would be!

17.06.2014 10:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Penicillifera apicalis

17.06.2014 10:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oroplema oyamana???

17.06.2014 10:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hulodes caranea male

17.06.2014 10:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mixochlora vittata

17.06.2014 10:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tanaorhinus rafflesii

17.06.2014 10:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Artena inversa

17.06.2014 5:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.06.2014 5:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From admin yesterday pulled. Alexander, you have to also looked sometimes :)

17.06.2014 5:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypocometa leptomita / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.06.2014 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea athalia / Andrey Sazykin Melitaea diamina / Alexsandr Martukov.

17.06.2014 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea athalia Melitaea diamina.

17.06.2014 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lycaena dispar Lycaena hippothoe.

17.06.2014 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lycaena dispar Lycaena hippothoe.

17.06.2014 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.06.2014 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.06.2014 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.06.2014 2:22, Peter Khramov:

Nitsche Nitsche, I tighten identity. Although it is not too soon moderski. The plan is to have time to do all the new basic somewhere to 1-3 in July, then I'll leave in, sometimes without tyrnete, and on his return, I think, will be a time and do firmly moderskimi functions, not just the admin. More precisely, the content, and not only the functionality.

17.06.2014 2:20, Peter Khramov:

If you make all the Latin alphabet, the names will be Russian and Latin. Or rather, Cyrillic. For as they separate from the foreign? That is neponyatnka.

17.06.2014 0:29, Alexsandr Martukov:

Lycaena hippothoe - exactly

17.06.2014 0:29, Alexsandr Martukov:

Lycaena hippothoe

17.06.2014 0:24, Alexsandr Martukov:

Perhaps ... but the site is only one female Fota hippothoe ...

17.06.2014 0:20, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

17.06.2014 0:19, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

17.06.2014 0:19, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

17.06.2014 0:15, Alexsandr Martukov:

It is doubtful that Melitaea athalia, similar to Melitaea diamina (incomplete series of spots on the hind wings)

17.06.2014 0:15, Andrei Komrakov:

On the female Lycaena hippothoe more like.

17.06.2014 0:12, Andrei Komrakov:

Yes, I realized he missed the line ..)

17.06.2014 0:11, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea diamina (rear wing two complete series)

16.06.2014 23:46, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea diamina (two rows of spots on the hind wings).

16.06.2014 23:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Melitaea phoebe / Tentatively identified Melitaea diamina / Confidently identified.

16.06.2014 21:39, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea diamina

16.06.2014 21:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, about box

16.06.2014 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis cinnamomeana / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

16.06.2014 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That helped edit the line "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age"
Andrew and all. Please write the name of the species in the line: "The name of the form" . So the butterfly will be immediately in certain modernizing and less work .....

16.06.2014 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oligia strigilis / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

16.06.2014 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.06.2014 16:42, Peter Khramov:

You mean mahogany? Ok, I'll be in the LV in the area of ​​25, if you eliminate the bag is stuck with it.

16.06.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2014 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2014 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"If the mountain will not come to Mohammed Mohammed .... So he goes to the mountain" :)
Tortured wait for a response from the void (
I did genus 3 species in it and moved ......

16.06.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ommatophora luminosa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.06.2014 15:25, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

16.06.2014 15:23, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

16.06.2014 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.06.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.06.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2014 15:22, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

16.06.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2014 15:21, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

16.06.2014 15:21, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

16.06.2014 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.06.2014 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.06.2014 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.06.2014 15:19, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

16.06.2014 15:19, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

16.06.2014 15:18, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

16.06.2014 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. The "Russian" was referring to the Latin alphabet, English .... and all the other language understood by all :)

16.06.2014 14:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrhoe tristata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.06.2014 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They do not go to the Russian:

As to the person to contact if necessary?

16.06.2014 14:51, Basil Sergienko:

tristata

16.06.2014 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ostrinia nubilalis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 14:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysoteuchia culmella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 14:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysoteuchia culmella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If the author does not put a question mark, then I stand clear. And please do not kick me for this.

16.06.2014 14:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Platyptilia gonodactyla / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chiasmia clathrata / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.06.2014 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.06.2014 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.06.2014 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.06.2014 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Glucan site, and it seems only one remained moder (all too busy .... And even though I manage, something of their own to catch and put :)

16.06.2014 14:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No problem :)

16.06.2014 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.06.2014 14:17, Shamil Murtazin:

And now the place to identify? =)

16.06.2014 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Stauropus fagi / Confidently identified / Male / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 13:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Stauropus fagi / Confidently identified / Male / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thyatira batis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.06.2014 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No one here has not been straightened. Compensate :)

16.06.2014 12:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Ostrinia nubilalis

16.06.2014 12:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Chrysoteuchia culmella

16.06.2014 12:23, Shamil Murtazin:

Platyptilia gonodactyla

16.06.2014 12:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Thyatira batis

16.06.2014 12:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Stauropus fagi

16.06.2014 12:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Timandra comae

16.06.2014 12:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Timandra comae

16.06.2014 12:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Epirrhoe hastulata?

16.06.2014 12:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Chiasmia clathrata

16.06.2014 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will wait, I think there will be :)
In the meantime, I'm going to the site to ensure the Vladimir Daphne ..... They are there even more than ino with Aglaia together :)

16.06.2014 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in yet inaccurate, and further, only time will tell :)

16.06.2014 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mamestra brassicae / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Dichonia aeruginea / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.06.2014 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mamestra brassicae / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Dichonia aeruginea / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.06.2014 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Mamestra brassicae / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Dichonia aeruginea / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.06.2014 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it means well :) I suspect is true, too, was wrong. Bear in Dichonia :)

16.06.2014 11:22, Basil Sergienko:

Wrong is Dichonia, likely aeruginea. This also applies to the rest of the images that ekz.iz Serbia

16.06.2014 10:19, Alexsandr Martukov:

On the other hand, the climate becomes warmer and the area is shifted to the north. I've been waiting for Daphne we hit the 60th parallel, in the northeast of the Vologda region.

16.06.2014 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.06.2014 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.06.2014 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.06.2014 8:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The issue was dropped, it varies so :)

16.06.2014 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I highly doubt the correct determination of the author of these three scoop.

16.06.2014 8:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lacanobia sp.

16.06.2014 8:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lacanobia sp.

16.06.2014 8:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lacanobia sp.

16.06.2014 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, when it? Photos of plants, etc. Piling up a little :)

16.06.2014 7:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea mulciber / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

16.06.2014 7:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea mulciber / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

16.06.2014 7:18, Evgeny Komarov:

Euploea mulciber.

16.06.2014 7:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quote from CS Defense: "In the Moscow region is located near the northern border of the area".
My B. daphne from the Vladimir region: 117 km. from Moscow, 15 km. from the administrative border of Moscow and Vladimir regions :) There's kind of quite common and are much more likely not very large perlamutrovok.So as butterfly constantly observed me in Lyubertsy District., Moscow region, which is about 9 km. from MKAD (the Moscow Ring Road "........
Which is nonsense, all these regional red books ....... (no words).

16.06.2014 1:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus genutia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.06.2014 1:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.06.2014 1:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.06.2014 1:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.06.2014 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hasora schoenherr / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.06.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Realizing that the species is represented here in abundance: not resist and put one. Painfully, they are now pretty :)

15.06.2014 21:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I will take!

15.06.2014 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus chrysippus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.06.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is no more doubt :)

15.06.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.06.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.06.2014 5:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Released today imago upload :)

15.06.2014 5:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thetidia smaragdaria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.06.2014 5:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chlorissa viridata Thetidia smaragdaria.

15.06.2014 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Chlorissa viridata Thetidia smaragdaria.

15.06.2014 2:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.06.2014 2:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.06.2014 2:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.06.2014 2:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.06.2014 1:36, Yuri Semejkin:

And again on the Dutchman's pipe. Here write http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/9488, that gets kirkazon sluchayno.Za the past 3 years, these caterpillars on plants of the family Vinogradov Islands is not met even once. Always only Dutchman's pipe, which she has refused.
Yes, often caterpillars eating one food plant, can be found at al., They do not eat.This happens when for example, they simply fall (not all types) down for various reasons.
But in this case, once all this is doubtful. Nevertheless, I took one. I'll try to give kirkazona along with wild grapes and parthenocissus. Maybe that will start there.

15.06.2014 0:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.06.2014 0:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.06.2014 0:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.06.2014 0:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

14.06.2014 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For petropolitanoy I then especially in Beloomut traveled. This southeast MO (160 km. From Moscow). It is local and perhaps repeat: flying a month earlier than Mayer. That does not come across.

14.06.2014 22:26, Alexsandr Martukov:

I Petropolitana something does not come across, looking for the teeth and each time disappointed. At our 60th parallel second Maher saw today. It looks brand new and quite large chernuschschie. Probably just begun years.

14.06.2014 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I uploaded by two pairs of the form to show the variability of coloration. Let it not frighten anyone :)

14.06.2014 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think this is Daphne, but it is necessary that someone is confirmed or refuted. Kind of not really my peculiar places, and there are many. Hence the question :)

14.06.2014 12:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Basil!

14.06.2014 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, I think that's better than these small and move: while they are still not quite "accustomed" to the biotope. The main thing that kirkazon in the place where they will transfer to guzzle steel :) So, in my opinion it is necessary to carry out the transfer in "Mlad age." Good luck :)

14.06.2014 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

14.06.2014 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Anna, that's how it will be better, I think :)

14.06.2014 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.06.2014 11:32, Vladimir Bryukhov:

Can not be combined into one group number # 30539, # 30540, # 30541, # 30542, # 30543, # 30544, # 30545.

14.06.2014 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Problepsis, which is close to plenorbis

14.06.2014 3:45, Yuri Semejkin:

I want to try to create a new point of habitat altsinoya. Dutchman's pipe is there, but the butterflies altsinoya in this place has ever seen. But there is a question: When is it better to endure caterpillars about such small or better enable them to grow up, and then move into the wild?
Opinions are?

14.06.2014 2:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais io / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

14.06.2014 0:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Aglais io

14.06.2014 0:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Caterpillar on Urtica angustifolia

13.06.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.06.2014 18:08, Peter Khramov:

Who made this: signature name / surname of the text are the user's language (including Russian) in all versions of the site, and the signature on the photo - in Latin. Perhaps we should do all in Latin. But then what about the Russian? Will thought - reported.

13.06.2014 16:09, Peter Khramov:

Typo. Removed.

13.06.2014 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Baorisa, hieroglyphica / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2014 15:30, Evgeny Komarov:

And what a comma between genera and species?

13.06.2014 15:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Baorisa, hieroglyphica.

13.06.2014 15:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Baorisa, hieroglyphica.

13.06.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

It suggests that somewhere there is a synonym which sits on the site :)
Check

13.06.2014 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it is necessary to add :) Scoop famous for the Old and think it can be found easily. I am unfortunately at work tomorrow so I can not do it myself :)

13.06.2014 8:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.06.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.06.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.06.2014 2:00, Peter Khramov:

Still there is an ash box with painting under very dark mahogany. She too loose fitting lid to the box, and there are crack / a scratch in the area of ​​1.5 cm on the glass. Selling is not comme il faut, but before you throw in the trash ask what we can have to diy free? WMS Kaifu who will fix and seal the candy for himself.I can cross thread somewhere in the subway in the capital of immense.

13.06.2014 1:53, Peter Khramov:

There are high box 30h40h7,2 see beech, cover with glass. I'll give 800 re for an objective review. Offer relevant to the end of June. Box is such: http://lepstore.ru/catalog/1771.
The site from time to time comes to talk about the book on the conduct of the collections. In the shop there was a fresh edition: Collection of insects. The collection, processing and storage of the material. M .: KMK 2012.Link to page Magazev: http://lepstore.ru/catalog/1887. Fold will not, because the purchase price for the book is high, but pay attention to what she actually has in this world: -))

13.06.2014 1:36, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, I remember everything, and soon he'll get to: -)

12.06.2014 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Please do not be confused with L. petropolitaa: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26944, which flies in the whole month ahead :)

12.06.2014 23:25, Alexsandr Martukov:

The girl is ours, dear!)))

12.06.2014 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Begins the second a thousand of his photos with the image of this wonderful satire. Zhnakovaya butterfly for me :) Good luck to all in this and future seasons :)

12.06.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you very much, Irina :)

12.06.2014 22:31, Irina Nikulina:

I know that a lot of ICAR website prostite- not resist :) I love this shot - sunny ... all nice sunny summer and new findings / discoveries / photo!)

12.06.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just noticed :) And it became dinner spider Misumena vatia :) Recently, this same poor fellow-Aporia Crataegi exhibited: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29530
This spider chameleon quite successfully disguised as a flower color which watches its prey :)

12.06.2014 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

12.06.2014 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica adusta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.06.2014 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica adusta / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.06.2014 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Japonica lutea Japonica adusta.

12.06.2014 20:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia pusillata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

12.06.2014 20:46, Basil Sergienko:

Eupithecia pusillata

12.06.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica lutea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.06.2014 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica lutea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.06.2014 19:40, Irina Nikulina:

I would put in inaccurateJaponica adustacvoi thoughts on this written here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6383/

12.06.2014 19:39, Irina Nikulina:

I would put in inaccurateJaponica adustacvoi thoughts on this here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6383/ wrote to the correct definition does not insist, I am ready to discuss. Maybe someone knows the other differences between these two types?

12.06.2014 19:36, Irina Nikulina:

The debate is already three years ago, saw the accident, but I want to add - to discuss - their views, although not resident) Butterflies those seen in nature, and in the collection, was interested in differences. The most significant (in appearance): 1. adusta always slightly larger (it is clear that this is not a sign of a photo) 2.background wings adusta (and top and underside) brighter shade of yellow less, more reddish (pink) 3. blackout at the top of the PC (top) in adusta less captures its cutting edge 4. On the PC at the underside adusta median strip longer than a few wider and located closer to the central cell spot (it can also be called short strip).Here, in my opinion, Japonica adusta. I think the color rendition is not to blame. Yuri says that on several occasions met marshmallows just such a hue. I can confirm that there are marshmallows in the south of Primorye (in the vicinity of Vlad on, not just in the Khasan district of), though there are less than yellowish.And they always have the distance between the median strip and the central spot of the cell less. Pictures by Vladimir Meshcheryakov delivered to the site. http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30488 http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30487 http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30486 http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30485

12.06.2014 19:35, Irina Nikulina:

Japonica lutea

12.06.2014 19:34, Irina Nikulina:

Japonica lutea

12.06.2014 19:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eumedonia eumedon.

12.06.2014 19:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumedonia eumedon / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

12.06.2014 19:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumedonia eumedon / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

12.06.2014 19:01, Andrei Komrakov:

I do not understand: it is a form Evmedona, or what?

12.06.2014 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.06.2014 18:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Once again I pay attention to what we have on the site marshmallow oak (Quercusia quercus blue of the catalog) is presented as two "independent" types - Favonius quercus and Neozephyrus quercus. Thus at first a synonym of the second, first and the second. Well Quercusia quercus synonyms in both.

12.06.2014 16:47, Alexsandr Martukov:

It is still female!

12.06.2014 16:44, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:43, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:43, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

12.06.2014 16:42, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:42, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:41, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:41, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

12.06.2014 16:41, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

12.06.2014 16:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

12.06.2014 16:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

12.06.2014 16:39, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

12.06.2014 16:39, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:39, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:38, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

12.06.2014 16:38, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

12.06.2014 16:38, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

12.06.2014 13:48, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

12.06.2014 13:37, Anna Gerasimova:

Dmitry, I am in Nepal. Till. I am leaving a week later. Our house is just under the mountain, the forest can be seen from the window. Sometimes they fly, but not enough. I think it is really powerful lamp would change the situation. The next time the stock))
Another noted that after an evening shower, they are less willing to fly. A frequent showers today. Still, during the rainy season.

12.06.2014 13:32, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

12.06.2014 10:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dilophodes elegans / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2014 10:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dilophodes elegans / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2014 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pogonopygia nigralbata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2014 10:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Young caterpillars only vyshli.Pervye hours of life.

12.06.2014 10:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Baorisa hieroglyphica.

12.06.2014 10:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Baorisa hieroglyphica. something I can not find in the catalog

12.06.2014 10:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2014 9:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Is far :)

12.06.2014 9:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

It Basil fled from the balcony :)

12.06.2014 9:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudosciaphila branderiana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.06.2014 5:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first butterfly today :) Highlight: caught directly in the apartment :)

12.06.2014 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis paphia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Brenthis ino / Vladimir Bryukhov.

12.06.2014 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In those places where there is a picture in abundance all three mentioned species perlamutrovok. Eno is transferred to the horns if not :)

12.06.2014 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis paphia / Vasiliy Feoktistov Brenthis ino / Vladimir Bryukhov.

12.06.2014 1:48, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Vladimir rights. Meadowsweet - hence, Ino.

12.06.2014 0:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Do not rush to conclusions. Some of the caterpillars of different ages change their appearance beyond recognition. Ideally, it would be good to grow up butterfly photographed all stages.

11.06.2014 22:30, Vladimir Bryukhov:

I think that view is defined incorrectly. Do not see the characteristic "horns" of the head, typical for the larvae of this species. In the photo is likely caterpillar Brenthis ino. Another very similar Brenthis daphne, but that sort of feeds on Rubus. Between these kinds of distinctions I do not know.

11.06.2014 22:28, Vladimir Bryukhov:

I think that view is defined incorrectly. Do not see the characteristic "horns" of the head, typical for the larvae of this species. Tavolga on which the caterpillar is an indirect confirmation of my version. In the photo is likely caterpillar Brenthis ino. Another very similar Brenthis daphne, but that sort of feeds on Rubus. Between these kinds of distinctions I do not know.

11.06.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That reminded me that this defined Vlad :) There was no such opportunity, and therefore, take this opportunity suffered now :)

11.06.2014 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vlad Proklov.

11.06.2014 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. And both forms on the same balcony catching honest :)

11.06.2014 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, in my opinion you're right in the definition. See for yourself: she shines so the same pattern as that of the previously placed classic, white form. The only thing that confuses is the appointed time for the eighth flight of the region: July - August (though it is the same for both types) :)

11.06.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

11.06.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

11.06.2014 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vlad Proklov.

11.06.2014 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C'mon: joke :)

11.06.2014 16:42, Alexsandr Martukov:

Aha-huh!)))

11.06.2014 15:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Duc "blue" they, therefore, copper-butterfly :)

11.06.2014 15:17, Alexsandr Martukov:

:-)))

11.06.2014 15:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysaethria caerulimargo / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.06.2014 15:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No one did :) Just fun. I read somewhere that our sambucaria belongs to uraniid. Laughed then...... Came to mind :)

11.06.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

And do not slander on blues, here are just sitting in the resting stage, Basil pictured two males, do not lyubopytstvo issue of sexual harassment. :)

11.06.2014 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, it's one of the good features. :)

11.06.2014 13:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dysaethria caerulimargo

11.06.2014 13:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Who offered uraniid? It's more of Microniini which are way more similar to local uraniids.
Two species of these "relatives" are quite common in Borneo, at least 10 specimens come over at night.

11.06.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 13:06, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 13:06, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.06.2014 13:03, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 12:39, Alexsandr Martukov:

Smear that goes from red to black dots?

11.06.2014 12:36, Alexsandr Martukov:

No white smear in submarginal area underside of the rear wings?

11.06.2014 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 12:31, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

11.06.2014 12:30, Alexsandr Martukov:

The male amandus turns out that the smaller red spots!

11.06.2014 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Duc is clear that different :) I just wanted to say that faced with similar from cabbage. There generally is attached to semiargus alexis: probably like the new hybrid patch up :)

11.06.2014 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ozola falcipennis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.06.2014 12:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Organopoda cnecosticta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.06.2014 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypocometa leptomita / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.06.2014 12:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pogonopygia nigralbata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.06.2014 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta rubiginosa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.06.2014 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thyas javanica / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.06.2014 11:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

Alexander, you can see on what grounds it is not amandus?

11.06.2014 11:57, Alexsandr Martukov:

Vasily, there you have all different underside! And here is almost the same figure for the difference in the tone of one dark (brown) and another lighter (gray). For me personally affiliation remains a mystery ...

11.06.2014 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achaea serva / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

11.06.2014 11:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nigmiini.

11.06.2014 11:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Achaea serva

11.06.2014 11:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thyas javanica

11.06.2014 11:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ornithospila sp. Only on the genitals.

11.06.2014 11:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Acronicta rubiginosa

11.06.2014 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yep, this is true geometer not uraniid. Relative to our local Ourapteryx sambucaria :)

11.06.2014 11:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

11.06.2014 11:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ourapteryx podaliriata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.06.2014 11:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pogonopygia nigralbata

11.06.2014 11:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Collix mesopora???

11.06.2014 11:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypocometa leptomita

11.06.2014 11:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Organopoda cnecosticta

11.06.2014 11:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ozola falcipennis

11.06.2014 9:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Golubyaki all this suffering: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5529
Too long to decide once :)

11.06.2014 8:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.06.2014 8:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.06.2014 8:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 8:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.06.2014 8:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.06.2014 8:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.06.2014 8:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 8:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 8:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 8:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.06.2014 8:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

These are different kinds, I wrote :) female - Polyommatus amandus, male Polyommatus icarus I did not clean up the species name because it was the right one :)

11.06.2014 7:13, Alexsandr Martukov:

These butterflies of different colors. One brown - left, and the other blue - right. Second, I lift a blade of grass, and it disbanded blue wings, then flew.
1. Either it - male and female. 2. Whether it is - different kinds.

11.06.2014 7:09, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 7:08, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 7:08, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 7:07, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 7:07, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 7:07, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 7:06, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 7:05, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 7:05, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 7:04, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 7:04, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 7:03, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 7:03, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 7:02, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

11.06.2014 7:02, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

11.06.2014 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cechenena lineosa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.06.2014 3:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uploaded mood (
Because of this weather all plans collapsed. Planned with the men on the night of 11 to 12 floors with a generator in the south of Moscow region, in Silver-Prudskoy area and here: foiled trip (
Now, forced to sit at home and banal urban post (
One hopes that the 12th, I will go to the Vladimir region.forParasemia plantaginisand bring males (again, as if the weather will fit).
Sorry, burst ......
No wonder the moths "rain" called them .....

11.06.2014 2:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put until inaccurate. Although there seems no longer similar. Reinsured.

11.06.2014 2:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vamuna remelana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.06.2014 1:28, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, I believe, but look here, on the site, the most common in our region Damophila (Coleophora) scattered on the four species, and decided to put) ..

11.06.2014 1:20, Maxim Schwarz:

Beauty!

11.06.2014 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Il Damophila to identify the photos, very high probability of errors in almost all cases it is necessary to cook.

11.06.2014 0:58, Irina Nikulina:

Coleophora deauratella, I think (the mustache is very characteristic)

11.06.2014 0:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.06.2014 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.06.2014 0:16, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius taxila

11.06.2014 0:16, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius taxila

10.06.2014 23:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius ultramarinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 23:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius ultramarinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 23:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexsandr Martukov Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 23:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus amandus Polyommatus icarus.

10.06.2014 23:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus amandus / Alexsandr Martukov Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.06.2014 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus amandus / Alexsandr Martukov Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 23:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus amandus / Alexsandr Martukov Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 23:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus amandus / Alexsandr Martukov Polyommatus icarus / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Male & female Female.

10.06.2014 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male Polyommatus icarus

10.06.2014 23:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips xylosteana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 23:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips xylosteana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 23:13, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius ultramarinus

10.06.2014 23:13, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius ultramarinus

10.06.2014 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 21:46, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

10.06.2014 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 21:44, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

10.06.2014 21:44, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

10.06.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.06.2014 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 21:43, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

10.06.2014 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

10.06.2014 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 21:43, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

10.06.2014 21:42, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

10.06.2014 21:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male and female

10.06.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Xenochroa mediogrisea / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.06.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera tenompoka / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sinna calospila / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good zheltushki never too much :)
But in reality: there to catch and put the females are lighter form of the second generation and that's enough ...

10.06.2014 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sinna calospila / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sinna calospila / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Caterpillar fifth age" better-to read :)

10.06.2014 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A comma is placed on anyone. Her hands can be put down if you need it.

10.06.2014 20:09, Peter Khramov:

There autosubstitution. "Caterpillar" and "Refinement" - two separate fields.

10.06.2014 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agnidra fuscilinea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Canucha specularis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Vamuna remelana / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Autumn: finally woke up after work :)
It helped a comparison with his two crataegana. By the way: on the balcony is now notorious pieces of six sitting at a minimum. There is nothing to compare :)

10.06.2014 19:29, Irina Nikulina:

It happens) And here is how came clear? The pictures only? As for xylosteana I also did not have full confidence.

10.06.2014 19:24, Irina Nikulina:

I do not know about the toxicity, but to frighten and harass it is not necessary - hissing sharply and dangerously))

10.06.2014 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Archips crataegana / Vasiliy Feoktistov Archips xylosteana / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Archips crataegana / Vasiliy Feoktistov Archips xylosteana / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Doubts are justified, Irina. And I was always "made a blunder": what is wildly sorry :)

10.06.2014 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dindica alaopis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea celebensis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 18:50, Shamil Murtazin:

I suppose more poisonous? ..)

10.06.2014 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemyra bornemontana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trabala ganesha / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, well, you take away autosubstitution this point, please :) I do not need it all.

10.06.2014 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.06.2014 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have no doubt despite lepiforum: very variable and it is massive. Himself doubted when molbiol put two different looks. Proklov both identified as the crataegana :)

10.06.2014 18:22, Irina Nikulina:

Pro balcony no doubt, but in the butterfly remained some doubt http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Archips_Crataegana

10.06.2014 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.06.2014 18:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brahmaea tancrei / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 18:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia seriatopunctata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips crataegana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 18:11, Irina Nikulina:

Spilarctia seriatopunctata

10.06.2014 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips crataegana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 18:11, Irina Nikulina:

Brahmaea tancrei

10.06.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Archips crataeganafull balcony at me lately.

10.06.2014 17:38, Irina Nikulina:

Archips xylosteana?

10.06.2014 17:37, Irina Nikulina:

Archips xylosteana?

10.06.2014 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ israel sade Danaus chrysippus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus.

10.06.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

israel sade Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ israel sade Danaus chrysippus / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Danaus chrysippus.

10.06.2014 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

israel sade Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 14:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ israel sade Danaus chrysippus / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.06.2014 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

10.06.2014 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with the second pair, diversana, for this dkmayu :)

10.06.2014 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Choristoneura lafauryana / Alexandr Zhakov Choristoneura diversana / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Choristoneura lafauryana / Alexandr Zhakov Choristoneura diversana / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is without question.

10.06.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Nyctemera tenompoka / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Shamil Murtazin.

10.06.2014 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Shamil Murtazin.

10.06.2014 10:51, Irina Nikulina:

To confirm the last definition http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/24956 this spring the caterpillars were collected from the same bush euonymus. Today, safely out these cute pests)

10.06.2014 10:40, Irina Nikulina:

Here it is necessary to write down the definition of Shamil)

10.06.2014 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

AUT :) Question lively and true definition. Something must be addressed.

10.06.2014 4:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Author Last number 1189 on the list: do not understand a damn thing.

10.06.2014 3:42, Peter Khramov:

I'm in Moscow now has a balcony like flies. So where should you want to fly virtually ...

10.06.2014 3:38, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, in the next few days and see.
Basil, in all language versions have required field - first / last name in Latin. The problem is only if people confused, and wrote to the data in a different language. If you see this - tells you where.

10.06.2014 3:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapeta hamana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 3:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agapeta hamana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.06.2014 3:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.06.2014 3:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.06.2014 3:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.06.2014 3:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 3:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 3:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.06.2014 3:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Diacrisia sannio / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

10.06.2014 0:28, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, that's for sure is she? By Sinev Lafauryana south it occurs in 9 regions. Look, please, just in case more time on both me they no longer seen as diversana.

10.06.2014 0:01, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

10.06.2014 0:01, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

10.06.2014 0:01, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

10.06.2014 0:00, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

09.06.2014 23:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

09.06.2014 23:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

09.06.2014 23:28, Irina Nikulina:

It is, I think, but only some very bestochechnaya) Previously, such "neat" is not met, decided to play it safe)

09.06.2014 23:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Agapeta hamana?

09.06.2014 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 22:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Butterfly successfully released ... and found in the same place in the morning. where you took the picture :)

09.06.2014 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter must-have in the rules prescribe that, if foreign friends English as a compulsory site. And people are already watching Regan from Israel and I think all in Hebrew.How will we communicate or understand though, would be the name? And what will happen if the Japanese still catch up with the Chinese? Internationality is certainly good, but to be on the site required a language understood by all :)

09.06.2014 22:08, Shamil Murtazin:

He identified the imago - Vasily Sergienko

09.06.2014 22:08, Shamil Murtazin:

He identified the imago - Vasily Sergienko

09.06.2014 22:08, Shamil Murtazin:

He identified the imago - Vasily Sergienko

09.06.2014 22:08, Shamil Murtazin:

He identified the imago - Vasily Sergienko

09.06.2014 22:08, Shamil Murtazin:

He identified the imago - Vasily Sergienko

09.06.2014 22:08, Shamil Murtazin:

He identified the imago - Vasily Sergienko

09.06.2014 21:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here's another tough moth. I never venture into the exact place :)

09.06.2014 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vitessa hieracica / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.06.2014 20:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Here's another glitch http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/305 Tribe is illustrated with photographs of the leaf!

09.06.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And nobody Satin Moth not overcome? I do that at work, that's just awful going home for about a week. I thought the heat will kill them anyway ......... fly. Still a lot of X. c-nigrum. But only one of hawk moths lime and flew to the balcony)

09.06.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena confusa / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea aversata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.06.2014 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.06.2014 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula bifida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.06.2014 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula bifida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.06.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2014 18:34, Irina Nikulina:

Furcula bifida?

09.06.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena confusa / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasionycta imbecilla / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 18:02, Basil Sergienko:

Hadena confusa

09.06.2014 18:01, Basil Sergienko:

Lasionycta imbecilla

09.06.2014 16:52, Zoran Bozovic:

Xanthorhoe fluctuata *

09.06.2014 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it was recently. "Some rake" simple :)

09.06.2014 16:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

What to ask, who is this, it was necessary to look at the number, we will now tormented. :)

09.06.2014 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, who Anna Eresenko will not ask ... Cool is somehow :)

09.06.2014 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Synchronously, however :) 16:10

09.06.2014 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Anna Eresenko Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea aversata / Confidently identified / Anna Eresenko.

09.06.2014 16:01, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea aversata

09.06.2014 15:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

On Rivul I do not pay attention. Another fake and tortured oculate revelers. At one point of their 44 pieces on the sheet sat. Plus dozens of small and medium-sized wine.

09.06.2014 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She and we usually have, in spite of its Red List. In 2012, all gathered at his post in Moscow at the Kazan station :)

09.06.2014 15:53, Irina Nikulina:

And I Ostrinia nubilalis and Rivula sericealis every cm))

09.06.2014 15:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

They torture me this weekend. All sheets stuck.

09.06.2014 15:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Anna Gerasimova !!! I guess there are a lot of light. We need more powerful lamp or to go into the forest. And you will be happy.
And where are you?

09.06.2014 15:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Two weeks ago pomuchalsya with their fees from Sabah. But when you figured out - there was all easy.

09.06.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.06.2014 15:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that's my doubts resolved :)

09.06.2014 15:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Digging is not necessary. Butterfly large. The first black bands on vernhnih not the letter M. The female Cyana malayensis

09.06.2014 15:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.06.2014 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.06.2014 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

09.06.2014 15:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female

09.06.2014 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, and tomorrow will come and rummage it too if you can.

09.06.2014 15:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No options female Cyana malayensis

09.06.2014 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Uchtu.

09.06.2014 14:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

These pictures are probably the first photo of this species in nature, the fact that the Japanese site is not very consistent with the original description and butterflies from the museum Witt.

09.06.2014 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nyctemera baulus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Nyctemera tenompoka / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nyctemera baulus / Vasiliy Feoktistov Nyctemera tenompoka / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/vk/dysplay_virt_koll.pl
This site seven boxes Nyctemera baulus no one is like a butterfly.But 8 boxes Nyctemera kinibalina all such white sash bottom razdvaevaetsya, but something is wrong, it was too specific, when the photo is only planned separation, barely noticeable, began to view all Nyctemera, until I found that we had, it tenompoka also endemic, rare and many times more than the previous species. I stand.

09.06.2014 13:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And here Nyctemera? Alexander, come on the pages specific to say about them. Decidedly not understand this approach. I leave now, I have no time.

09.06.2014 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I made a joke, and certainly not offended, in such a case it is necessary in kladovochku resentment on the top shelf.:) Interesting thing turns out, of course I looked at all the links, but variable species and a lot of similar, in this photo shows that stability in the figure, but that varies, it gave me the opportunity to so determine your collection, a special case, and I they looked just as much on the other.confidence, too, that they are correctly identified no, cooked them :) Here the probability of error is much lower than in the case Nyctemera kinibalina, look at these two species in the museum Witt and concluded no offense, too :)

09.06.2014 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No offense. For starters look to the right (there is just a couple of my collection and identification is born you'll see). Then type in a search engine and see Cyana how many similar :) very difficult group ... It is necessary to think long.
I would not risk it anywhere endure although seen.

09.06.2014 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dyscia conspersaria Dyscia innocentaria.

09.06.2014 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura lafauryana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura lafauryana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vlad Proklov Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 12:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

09.06.2014 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura lafauryana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 12:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura lafauryana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 12:29, Irina Nikulina:

I'm sorry, accidentally pressed)

09.06.2014 12:26, Irina Nikulina: This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2014 12:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hyles nicaea / Sergey Titov Hyles euphorbiae / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 12:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alright, I will not do it again. :)

09.06.2014 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not be risked, even inaccurate: it is different in my opinion. Malayensis hands held personally and in the collection is a pair with me.
Ungrateful thing: a lot of them seemingly similar :)

09.06.2014 11:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera ludekingii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diehlea ducalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diehlea ducalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyana malayensis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 11:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyana malayensis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 11:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemyra bornemontana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 10:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemyra ypsilon / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 10:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pasiphila rectangulata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

09.06.2014 10:00, Basil Sergienko:

Pasiphila rectangulata

09.06.2014 6:29, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Yes one dimension.

09.06.2014 6:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I did the ancient soap dish in which the flash in macro mode is blocked completely and removes only avomate. I wanted to change it, but not yet received (

09.06.2014 5:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

I have an old Canan C2 Super put, manual mode, the flash to the lowest rank, 1/500 shutter speed, aperture 5 when there is no time, and it is almost always no. If there is, put the flash reflector, then delayed conjure :)

09.06.2014 5:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, at which illuminate the subject directly on the screen? I can not get (though catching UV in large quantities) and you have podmarivat :)

09.06.2014 5:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

These generally terrible for me. All hope for Basil :)

09.06.2014 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry. Confusing, I do not see what is in the group.

09.06.2014 5:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Irina Nikulina.

09.06.2014 5:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Sergei Kotov.

09.06.2014 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.06.2014 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Significantly less than the magnitude of the thalassina, recently exhibited: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29800
And the color is very olichaetsya. I will not be day, and then I can try on the scope (both collected).
Available data on my scale:
thalassina: 32-42 mm
conticua: 34-40 mm
I wait until you touch.

09.06.2014 4:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

09.06.2014 3:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 3:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 3:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Malacosoma castrensis Malacosoma neustria.

09.06.2014 3:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Malacosoma castrensis Malacosoma neustria.

09.06.2014 2:53, Maxim Schwarz:

Buck

09.06.2014 0:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia artaxerxes / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.06.2014 0:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia artaxerxes / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.06.2014 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think that this color form. Svetlana, from memory, it http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30145 the same size?

09.06.2014 0:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Barsine lucibilis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 0:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Barsine lucibilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 0:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemyra bornemontana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.06.2014 0:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemyra bornemontana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.06.2014 23:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia suasa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.06.2014 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) :) Then just

08.06.2014 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lacanobia sp. ? This, I am afraid at all ....

08.06.2014 23:08, Basil Sergienko:

I am a supporter thalassina, they are so beautiful

08.06.2014 22:43, Shamil Murtazin:

lucky me to them ...)
caterpillar lay out tomorrow ...

08.06.2014 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, I have already looked accurate opinion is not, but because they do not become "act" probably correctly, somewhat typical coloration of a thalassina and w-latinum, even less suitable. Let remains is inaccurate. :) Maybe Sergienko still favors. :)

08.06.2014 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, this can be accurate in? :)

08.06.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'll ask a third party later :)

08.06.2014 22:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parastichtis suspecta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

08.06.2014 22:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta psi Acronicta tridens.

08.06.2014 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

three hours ago, it was psi, species are very similar and all Acronicta highly volatile, not knowing of both species, and you do not know them, it is difficult to say with certainty, but again I do not have an opinion. :)

08.06.2014 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Completely different. Suspis motley significantly compared to this: http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1291-acronicta-cuspis
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acronicta_Cuspis
and lighter wings it. No one like me in the balcony is not yet arrive

08.06.2014 21:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) No need to hurry, why did you come to the conclusion that there can be cuspis?

08.06.2014 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.06.2014 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I should translate into accurate so how psi and cuspis train disappear. We have more and there is no one to BM a similar pattern.

08.06.2014 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.06.2014 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vlad Proklov.

08.06.2014 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips crataegana / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

08.06.2014 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Archips crataegana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

08.06.2014 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vlad Proklov.

08.06.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

08.06.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

08.06.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I flew this "mystery" is good. Of course, the first copies. - The most mysterious :)

08.06.2014 20:33, Shamil Murtazin:

OK, so we write.
implying that the individual is determined by you.
Well, it was done at the imago :)

08.06.2014 20:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Interesting paradox, I spotted a butterfly pupa, I do not know, and the caterpillar, too, probably have to write similar to the http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30128

08.06.2014 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.06.2014 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2014 20:26, Shamil Murtazin:

but no, it took place :(

08.06.2014 20:24, Shamil Murtazin:

definition - Alexander Zhakov

08.06.2014 20:16, Shamil Murtazin:

definition - Alexander Zhakov

08.06.2014 20:16, Shamil Murtazin:

definition - Alexander Zhakov

08.06.2014 20:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you, Alexander!
Past this kind took place not even close)))

08.06.2014 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes I did and collect some did not, but only sfotal ... fresher and released. Tired already of them: and so there's nowhere to put :)

08.06.2014 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Choristoneura hebenstreitella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.06.2014 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

no.

08.06.2014 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

probably correctly, I cheated and left the definition for you, well, it is very difficult for one to identify butterfly, easier to cook, and the questions asked :) (I know the photo does not cook :))

08.06.2014 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acronicta psi / Confidently identified Acronicta tridens / Tentatively identified.

08.06.2014 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Goes to tridens.

08.06.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta tridens / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He came to the conclusion that it tridens still. Put in is inaccurate.

08.06.2014 19:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Although black c touch cuspis is. More nowhere to put :)

08.06.2014 19:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Archips rosana??

08.06.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More we do not have similar :)

08.06.2014 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta tridensthen: if Psi does not pull? Do not pull it and cuspis in my opinion.

08.06.2014 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acronicta psi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

08.06.2014 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta tridensthen?

08.06.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.06.2014 19:14, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2014 19:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is also a wrong definition.

08.06.2014 19:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil is not psychic, take away even from his inaccurate, black bar over his head, at the RCI this does not happen :)

08.06.2014 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I forgot to add: it may seem strange, but the find "plantaginaceae Bear" a great holiday for me.
Where I live it was looking for my entire adult life and could not find until now.
Value pull in more than 100 kilometers from home and Meshchora finally found a point :)
Glad indescribable.

08.06.2014 16:33, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Location - Gunung Alub

08.06.2014 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia rubriventris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bracca georgiata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vitessa hieracica / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hesudra mjobergi / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota albiformis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutodes flavescens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 15:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutodes flavescens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 15:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clethrophora angulipennis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate. Pinpoint is problematic: a very difficult race.

08.06.2014 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vitessa hieracica / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.06.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.06.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2014 12:35, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male.

08.06.2014 12:33, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female.

08.06.2014 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Less .... I became really bad :) Thank you!

08.06.2014 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Achlya flavicornis / Vasiliy Feoktistov Tethea ocularis / Basil Sergienko.

08.06.2014 11:50, Zoran Bozovic:

Philereme transversata *

08.06.2014 11:46, Basil Sergienko:

Tathea ocularis because

08.06.2014 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Surprised a lot (see. The catch) has long been flying off like it should.

08.06.2014 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

08.06.2014 3:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It requires confirmation / denial.

08.06.2014 3:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2014 3:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2014 3:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.06.2014 3:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Duc I understood. Just laugh it off :)

08.06.2014 0:47, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I said, 'Throw the End of the Line "by the results of the report, Dmitry, which were announced very interesting numbers, yeah, -)

07.06.2014 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Walked today three (went 2 more Moscow "zhuchista") in Omutischi where and going.
Podalirius not seen, unfortunately (
What is considered it necessary to upload:
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30098
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30099
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30100
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30101
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30102
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30103
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30104
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30105
In the photo "sand lizard" Lacerta agilis Linnaeus, 1758 : http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CF%F0%FB%F2%EA%E0%FF_%FF%F9% E5% F0% E8% F6% E0

Well-traveled. Satisfied :)

07.06.2014 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter walked in today :) You Grisha: "Throw Petushki" ......
Following the example of venechkom Yerofeyev I'll go there: "Where the birds do not stop, day or night where neither winter nor summer fades not jasmine." Benedict Erofeev "Moscow - Petushki" :)

07.06.2014 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ginshachia gemmifera / Confidently identified / Luvjoy Choker.

07.06.2014 20:57, Anna Gerasimova:

Dmitry, awesome))) At catcher and the beast running!
And I go out every night ... again no one came.

07.06.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sympis rufibasis / Confidently identified / Luvjoy Choker.

07.06.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ginshachia gemmifera / Confidently identified / Luvjoy Choker.

07.06.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ginshachia gemmifera / Confidently identified / Luvjoy Choker.

07.06.2014 16:18, Luvjoy Choker:

Sympis rufibasis
*

07.06.2014 16:13, Luvjoy Choker: This species is identified correctly.

07.06.2014 16:13, Luvjoy Choker: This species is identified correctly.

07.06.2014 16:08, Luvjoy Choker:

Ginshachia gemmifera *

07.06.2014 16:07, Luvjoy Choker:

Ginshachia gemmifera *

07.06.2014 14:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues Why it is necessary to come to theclinae. That's http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/14792 (Neozephyrus quercus) and here is http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8537 (Favonius quercus) synonyms of the same type, with separate pages on the site, and their sets images. So the catalog is Sineva Quercusia quercus.

07.06.2014 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

07.06.2014 7:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bye. I am leaving for a day "in the field" In the evening, if I'm able to continue :)

07.06.2014 6:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutodes flavescens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.06.2014 6:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutodes flavescens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.06.2014 6:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It requires confirmation / denial.

07.06.2014 0:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I will write here is not uplylo.
That's it: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29911 must be addressed. Definitely true, but I do not know what to do with it.
This is probably due to the fact that in recent years all erebid scoop etc. shoveled considerably. I can not find any kind or genus (

07.06.2014 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Excavated:
Ommatophora luminosa (Cramer, 1780): http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/ommatophorini/ommatophorini_1_1.php
http://mothtaiwan.blogspot.ru/2010/04/ommatophora-luminosa-cramer-1780.html
If I make a kind: there are probably unhappy :) Many unknown and it is necessary to solve it.

06.06.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.06.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.06.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.06.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Until inaccurate (the white spots on the front fender). In just do not give to deliver something that is not fully visible rear wing

06.06.2014 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima srivijayana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima srivijayana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 22:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima srivijayana / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 22:35, Igor Sakhno:

Oh, how - almost simultaneously.

06.06.2014 22:34, Igor Sakhno:

Maybe it's some kind of Lyssa zampa?

06.06.2014 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ischyja sp. I do not venture: it is necessary to have straightened my stuff.

06.06.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyssa zampa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyssa zampa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If we illustrate - that until the end :)
Right on the screen, which I catch the bastard dismisses (the pest in Muscovy second year in a row already in unprecedented quantities flies (

06.06.2014 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander I by your example tomorrow szzhu for a day in Meto " Where do not stop the birds, day and night, where neither winter nor summer does not fades jasmine." Benedict Erofeev "Moscow - Petushki": ) So I can determine how many Borneo. Get connected when you come.

06.06.2014 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, in other words: photos to the previously created group, you can add only one, and the two groups can not tie together?

06.06.2014 21:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bon Voyage. Come check: site we have two :)) Incidentally DV fully indeterminate left there .... I do not climb in principle :)

06.06.2014 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clethrophora angulipennis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Vamuna remelana / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A genus Milionia all :) Just beautiful complex are almost all in the definition.

06.06.2014 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put until inaccurate. Sophisticated them, although they are few like Borneo.

06.06.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Milionia fulgida / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Svetlana, a new kind of you :) By the same endemic to Borneo next.

06.06.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Problepsis borneamagna / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bracca georgiata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agnidra fuscilinea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Affect the work two days in a row is not to be confused :) childish ..... It also serpokrylka, and not Saturnia (
I stand

06.06.2014 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cricula sp. ? Saturniidae. C this would not venture (

06.06.2014 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera baulus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Glitches transfer repeated :)
By the way: all species that have the name "Kinabaluensis" or "Kinabalina" etc. automatically endemic to Borneo :)
Kinabalu: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%E8%ED%E0%E1%E0%EB%F3

06.06.2014 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera kinabaluensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.06.2014 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, this can not argue :) Sam it exhibited before ...

06.06.2014 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota heliconia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

06.06.2014 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put in inaccurate, and about altitude why I asked:
Nyctemera kinibalina Snellen, 1899 : "Habitat preference. On Kinabalu the species is infrequent from 1200m to 2100m. Two specimens were taken at round 1800m in upper montane forest on G. Mulu." http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-6/arctiinae/arctiinae-12-12.php
Nyctemera baulus Boisduval, 1832 : "Habitat preference. This is a widespread sometimes common species of lowland (up to 1200m) secondary, disturbed and agricultural ecosystems." http: // www.mothsofborneo.com/part-6/arctiinae/arctiinae-12-2.php
The head can break .....

06.06.2014 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Went to the South for a couple of days, Vasily Borneo Establish the possible, I will check :)))

06.06.2014 18:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera kinabaluensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.06.2014 18:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

the same as the previous Nyctemera

06.06.2014 18:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, at Nyctemera kinibalina tie into the bottom corner of the forks and how to ragulku forms, more at one of the other kind are not visible, even bends there, baby, can can be inaccurate, again strongly want to define. :)

06.06.2014 18:06, Svetlana Shchavelina:

So ... I found a couple more similar butterflies photo taken better (but shot the next day - or rather night). Look now loaded.

06.06.2014 17:57, Svetlana Shchavelina:

About 900-1000m above sea level
It was cold enough (16⁰S night, the day somewhere 23-25⁰S), damp.

06.06.2014 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A Nyctemera kinibalina my knowledge and rare species to the same endemic (even based on the Latin name).
Check-would have a height above sea level where you took the picture ......

06.06.2014 17:40, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Thank you! back home, just out of the airport will handle slowly ... and share photos. So get ready :)

06.06.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And forever buried there ........ (

06.06.2014 17:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

See. Figure Breast: http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/arct/baulus.html
Nothing specific for this shot, and not come up. Of course you can in neoprene. remove the lower wings again if it is not visible :)

06.06.2014 17:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, you're brave, Vasily. :) I would not give 20% of the correct definition, sorry 10%, where 10 species with a similar pattern. most of them are all similar, Nyctemera kinibalina, but without the rear wing, I generally would not identify. Nevizhu nor any reason to treat this butterfly to a specific type. not finding fault, simply stating the situation.

06.06.2014 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera baulus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.06.2014 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And as it turned out, "casket just opened" :)

06.06.2014 10:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In the summer I also just dolblyu your area. But in winter the soul requires. Therefore I am fishing in the tropics.

06.06.2014 7:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I'm so exotic here throws up from time to time, but never in my life in the tropics and did not happen :)
But for me the most personal research attracts central Russia. Patriot me :) And Meshchersky lowland all love :) And you say, "Throw the End of the Line" (.... Nah, I'll always be Venechka Yerofeyev in Petushki (those best-way) seek :)

06.06.2014 1:30, Peter Khramov:

Did. If this is done in the LC, something must first be removed from a group, and then can be added to another.

06.06.2014 0:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Confused, I personally sense the publication of photos: no informative value, or of art;), against the backdrop of higher quality than fifty photos.

06.06.2014 0:10, Peter Khramov:

And what is it?

05.06.2014 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

:(

05.06.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But still too unusual for him. I want to take off again the next day to see. The location is very interesting: the second year I go there all the time and have fallen in love. Almost every time someone new to bring out yourself :)

05.06.2014 18:39, Peter Khramov:

Figase! Basil, get out of Petushki and urgent at the Tropicana!

05.06.2014 18:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Podalirius I lovil.No there is not North. In the Nizhny Novgorod region, he almost on the border with the Kostroma region. flying.

05.06.2014 16:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.06.2014 16:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.06.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.06.2014 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.06.2014 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.06.2014 16:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Spilosoma niveum ?

05.06.2014 15:45, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

05.06.2014 15:44, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

05.06.2014 15:42, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

05.06.2014 15:41, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

05.06.2014 15:41, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

05.06.2014 15:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

Like the female ...

05.06.2014 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UP. Peter, do please :)

05.06.2014 11:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.06.2014 11:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus brillantinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.06.2014 11:23, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

05.06.2014 11:23, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus brillantinus

05.06.2014 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius saphirinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.06.2014 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius saphirinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.06.2014 10:55, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius saphirinus

05.06.2014 10:54, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius saphirinus

05.06.2014 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Goldia pacifica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.06.2014 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it's very close :) I do not reach there: troubles with the train. But the nature of the same. In those places, by the way he flies Podalirius not say, would be so if it were in the past year did not miss it right out of the net. Idee fixe that this year to find it, this northern :)

05.06.2014 10:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Summary results of a trip to Borneo (not copies, and kinds!)
Scoops certain - 223 species undetermined - 67 species
157 species of moths, 23 undefined
Medveditsy- 47 species
Brazhniki- 17 species
Pavlinoglazok- 0 (((

05.06.2014 9:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

On a white background I did not receive photos (horseradish I'm a photographer), I had to put a black T-shirt. However, it did not help much. Smaller species of Cyana (7 species) still have not turned out.

05.06.2014 9:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And where in Sabah removed?

05.06.2014 9:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Next stop on the train, in the direction of Vladimir Petushki

05.06.2014 9:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

He served in the Kostereva 2

05.06.2014 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, I forgot to ask :) And where he served under a cockerel? Can I know :)

05.06.2014 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To light the most relevant in my opinion.
And as I had not guessed?
After sfotaesh, for example Belyanko some and then "squirm" in the editor to make it on a white background somehow stood out (and the black background, this question is easily solved:)

05.06.2014 1:29, Peter Khramov:

Black background - a good idea for most butterflies. Take a look decent photo with dried fotami - almost always choose black background ...

05.06.2014 1:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm basically on this site http://www.mothsofborneo.com and then check. it ends, and then you leave that does not :)

05.06.2014 1:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trabala ganesha / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 1:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trabala ganesha / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 1:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to google. Nyctemera black I have not come across: there are not many should be in my opinion. On the phone, as without hands ... Although with an Internet, already annoyed (

05.06.2014 0:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diehlea ducalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 0:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diehlea ducalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 0:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nyctemera, but what ?, without the lower wing probably never know.

05.06.2014 0:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diehlea ducalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 0:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Barsine cruciata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 0:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Endemic to Borneo, by the way. Maybe even be endemic: there are many of them. Svetlana, a successful trip you :)

05.06.2014 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Teulisna ruptifascia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 0:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.06.2014 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.06.2014 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemyra bornemontana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemyra bornemontana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 0:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemyra bornemontana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

05.06.2014 0:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia groganae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 23:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia rubriventris / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 23:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilarctia ericsoni / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amerila astreus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 23:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Urapteroides astheniata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 23:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutodes flavescens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Goldia pacifica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Goldia pacifica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And now a little bit, but there is. Beat them mercilessly (and there is full of vipers, snakes and all sorts of reptiles. Meschera .... By the way this is not reaching to Petushki by train 2 stops if you go from Moscow. Good places: there now "pasus" constantly. Yana, by the way, vysheitozhe shown quite steep there :)

04.06.2014 22:49, Irina Nikulina:

It should be noted that these photos are unique, online images Goldia pacifica in nature. It is a rare species with limited distribution, endemic Primorye. The Red Book of Russian view was entered under the name Hetoprokta Pacific (Chaetoprocta pacifica).The species was known from a single location in the Primorye Territory in the southern spur of the Blue Ridge (Anuchinsky District, Blue Ridge, 30 km from the village Chernyshovks), which was described in 1984.That is what is said about him in the Red Book of the Primorsky Territory "View ... known only two butterflies collected in the first half of July in the virgin coniferous-deciduous forest in the valley of the key.Based on the fact that the Golden Pacific until now known only from two specimens, one can conclude that the number of species in nature is low, and its habitat is very local.It is possible that the spread of Golden in the Primorye Territory is really limited spurs Blue Ridge, moreover, only portions of which are preserved in the mixed forests boled valley .. "For a long time could not find more than this kind of new butterflies. In the summer of 2000 in the area of ​​cartilage. Blue has found another population.And in July 2010, Vladimir discovered a new habitat Goldia pacifica and made a series of photos of marshmallow Pacific in nature.

04.06.2014 22:48, Irina Nikulina:

Goldia pacifica

04.06.2014 22:48, Irina Nikulina:

Goldia pacifica

04.06.2014 22:47, Irina Nikulina:

Goldia pacifica

04.06.2014 22:47, Irina Nikulina:

Goldia pacifica

04.06.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, a black background is a good idea for light butterflies. It should also experiment. Many removes blemishes associated with white background :)

04.06.2014 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, thank you, come on :)

04.06.2014 21:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gillmeria pallidactyla Gillmeria ochrodactyla.

04.06.2014 21:48, Irina Nikulina:

And let's fix that even my mistake last year :) eloquence and do not need - it was too convincing feet :)! Ochrodactyla it.

04.06.2014 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

everything is properly defined, I'll throw off in a personal picture with differences, and suddenly :)

04.06.2014 21:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

When I was in the Vladimir region from 98 to 2003 (10 km from Petushki) anguis there was the sea. Especially after the rain on asphalt.

04.06.2014 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gillmeria ochrodactyla / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

He talked eloquently :) indirect data, such as fodder plant and transported to the color of the legs Gillmeria ochrodactyla, while Peter did not unite them under one name or another, and as long as one view from the illustrations will be more :)

04.06.2014 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, then there are those, and there are pilauny with blue shiny scales

04.06.2014 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.06.2014 21:34, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, I agree, therefore, wrote to the discussion (we had only? Put) seemed to me that on the legs have alternating dark and light areas as happens with ochrodactyla (and in plain pallidactyla legs with one section of blackout). But most of tansy confused :) Rallidactyla almost always occurs on Yarrow, but ochrodactyla - "grazing", mainly on tansy.This drew attention to the fact Lepiforume. (Gillmeria ochrodactyla fliegt um Rainfarn (Tanacetum vulgare), daher ua auf Ruderalfluren. Gillmeria pallidactyla lebt an Schafgarbe (Achillea).

04.06.2014 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Some are more likely to have the next day. If I'm able to physically .... Now briefly reviewed, and seems to have found someone :)

04.06.2014 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, but to put these into precise I can not for obvious reasons (the author of a comment does not count, though he touched me personally his rudeness) :)
By the same I would like to ask the author.What is this place name "Novoperedelkino, New Moscow", used as the geography of the shooting? Maybe worth it to write "Moscow Western Administrative District, the district Novoperedelkino"? And then the so-called "New Moscow"?

04.06.2014 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria selene / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 19:09, Igor Sakhno:

Like and Argus, but not at the brilliant blue spots along the outer edge on the underside.

04.06.2014 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, in the wake of today's discussion. This is my yesterday. Look it, please ... What if ...? Ind. assembled and already raspravilke: soon lay out. Something it differently colored than those that I have exhibited before. Already I started to doubt :)

04.06.2014 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, but I'm just about what is best to compare the two insects on pins (here are some stuff for the most reliable determination not like, as it turns out, until the spray of bile: it is insulting to me) than to determine the nature of the photo related species. Just one but at retikulaty I did not catch until now.Now I'll know who to me except her endeavor. It's really close to me geographically :)

04.06.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alex, but it is not necessary to be rude in response to the 'legitimate joke :) As soon as just explained in the comments what and how. Why should you ask? Nature is such a joke: butterflies are often born and then live with deformed wings. What you do not live exhibit for the cabinet of curiosities? As for fasting, as you say "carrion" .......Yes, I did poschu so how do entomology for 30 years and have a sufficient collection to sometimes submit such species that you generally unlikely, when you see, much less take off live. In my opinion it is much more useful than the post suburban banal, but still uncertain ..To all: This message is simply an adequate response to the inadequate reaction to the joke. I do not like neurotic: it's contagious and is transmitted through the air to me :)

04.06.2014 17:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

The question is not what caught or not caught, and that determined or not. :)

04.06.2014 17:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, the definition of these types of images from the Internet a bad job, I would say that itGillmeria pallidactyla, it is on average slightly lighter thanGillmeria ochrodactyla= Gillmeria tetradactyla (Invalid name). Peter then two pages for the same species. we must unite. Both species fly from May to July. where to put?

04.06.2014 16:53, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

Lord "experts" I feel sorry for you - if you say that it is "an exhibit for the cabinet of curiosities." Butterfly was absolutely alive. And dries slowly straightening the wings. Then quietly departed. I do not remove dead insects principle. In contrast to the "experts" with pins.
psbefore you accuse and to hang a label about the cabinet of curiosities you can ask what and how ...
For sim - dosvidaniya.
continue to post mertvyachinu.

04.06.2014 16:19, Irina Nikulina:

Gillmeria tetradactyla http://eol.org/pages/4109571/overview

04.06.2014 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also sorry for her (
I do not venture to endure until the "exhibit for the cabinet of curiosities" :)

04.06.2014 15:35, Irina Nikulina:

PoorBoloria selene, I think

04.06.2014 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumedonia eumedon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 15:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria selene / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carterocephalus palaemon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 15:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put until inaccurate megacephala (melanistic come across in my area). There were two options: auricoma and the least likely aceris (flies much later than usual for us). He stopped still on megacephala. I will be glad to confirmation or refutation ...

04.06.2014 14:53, Irina Nikulina:

Araschnia levana

04.06.2014 14:52, Irina Nikulina:

Carterocephalus palaemon

04.06.2014 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Subacronicta megacephala / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.06.2014 14:47, Irina Nikulina:

Boloria selene

04.06.2014 14:46, Irina Nikulina:

Eumedonia eumedon

04.06.2014 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if caught both: Issues mean :) I just removed one retikulata always comes and really have nothing to compare :) Because after all, actually thought. Just Hripan me very close geographically. The second "in the subject", by the way, actually more like a classic retikulatu.

04.06.2014 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Zhdems, though not define, but watch :) But with God's help, most define right or wrong :)

04.06.2014 13:25, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hi-hi... I am in Thailand now... It is only ... 1/4 of all photos... Best of the best will be later!

04.06.2014 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, light, thank you very much, here on the six months of work :)
Very interesting picture, thank you.

04.06.2014 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia virgaureata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.06.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I caught those and those they are well characterized, although at first glance identical.

04.06.2014 13:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I would be in your place, so take your time with it. Retikulata varies greatly: cm. Laid me yesterday and laid out earlier. The day after tomorrow I can only check, but Kitty did not meet even once. Although it is listed. Figuring there must deepened or at least put in is inaccurate :)

04.06.2014 12:36, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you very much to you and Igor comes out, not mistaken. I'll know that at the border viridaty must be light , and not necessarily white.

04.06.2014 12:23, Basil Sergienko:

Well, edging a light (not necessarily white), and something like this feature working. But in fact this pair have to look for complex traits such as Alexander said, straightening desirable. Regarding this ind., Just in case I asked I.Kostyuka- in his opinion is viridata.

04.06.2014 12:12, Basil Sergienko:

virgaureata

04.06.2014 12:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not exactly a typical pattern and heavily worn, but it's more like a Sideridis kitti, than a butterfly from Slovakia. Tomuzhe 8 is known in the region. :)

04.06.2014 12:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sideridis reticulata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov Sideridis kitti / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 12:04, Irina Nikulina:

We hope to help Basil) saw him and soon put sayte- Eupithecia)

04.06.2014 11:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here Sergienko have to wait even attempt to define will not. :)

04.06.2014 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why ?, because there is a list of authors, and the list of registered users has long been more than a thousand, then it is necessary to introduce a separate section, and the authors are not among users nadesh :)

04.06.2014 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It should mean Peter wrote: "Announce the entire list, please" :)

04.06.2014 11:36, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackiiTo sravneniya- caterpillars of the 1st and 5th ages.

04.06.2014 11:36, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackiiTo sravneniya- caterpillars of the 1st and 5th ages. The Elephant and the lap-dogs))

04.06.2014 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Number "250", accidentally scored :)

04.06.2014 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria leucocephala / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It has long been said, in fact, that the disorder ....
"And things are there" (

04.06.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia subfusca / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 10:18, Irina Nikulina:

And these, too, flew 4 (

04.06.2014 10:08, Irina Nikulina:

Persistently flies (

04.06.2014 8:21, Alexsandr Martukov:

I, too, had doubts about their copies this year, but settled on this option purely visual features compared to the other, because of the bars on the wings, the size and shape of butterfly wings.

04.06.2014 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As in the past year in the Moscow region there is a massive departure Satin Moth. Now, in the morning they all seated balcony. This disaster (
But just a few years ago, it was not in such numbers ....

04.06.2014 5:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, of course, alsoSubacronicta megacephalaas here adopted. This I habitually :)

04.06.2014 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta megacephala? Unfortunately most do not have time to understand, and I want to ask for help :)

04.06.2014 4:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is, incidentally, one arrived then and more so I do not remember. Probably not very often :)

04.06.2014 4:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who is Alex Shparaga? Somehow, in the list of authors I have it :)

04.06.2014 4:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No big deal: fixed :)

04.06.2014 4:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya ochroleucana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 2:39, Irina Nikulina:

Oh ... and then flew to the space (

04.06.2014 2:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

All right, this literature is desirable if it does not, then the verbal instructions for Primorsky Krai :)

04.06.2014 2:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chlorissa cloraria / Zoran Bozovic Jodis lactearia / Basil Sergienko.

04.06.2014 1:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chlorissa viridata / Evgeny Komarov Thalera fimbrialis / Basil Sergienko.

04.06.2014 1:58, Irina Nikulina:

Guessed)) The moment of separation!

04.06.2014 1:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Trying to escape :)

04.06.2014 1:55, Irina Nikulina:

Could not help but put this picture)) "Top of domestication")) - "Now, stand on tiptoe to twist";) (as compensation for the loaded caddis)))

04.06.2014 1:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alex Shparaga Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 1:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya nubiferana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 1:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya ochroleucana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 1:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

caddis, in my opinion, it is necessary to remove. :(

04.06.2014 1:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hedya ochroleucana / Vitaly Gumenuk Hedya nubiferana / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 1:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya ochroleucana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 1:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya ochroleucana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.06.2014 1:14, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Basil. I am trying to figure out on your link. Only still uncertainties still remain how to deal with this sign indicated on Lepiforume- border yellow or reddish-brown color? .. It turns out that this feature does not always work?

04.06.2014 1:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notocelia cynosbatella / Confidently identified / Alex Shparaga.

04.06.2014 1:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notocelia cynosbatella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 1:06, Basil Sergienko:

This, in my opinion nothing to Chlorissa not have it Thalera fimbrialis

04.06.2014 1:03, Irina Nikulina:

Hedya ochroleucana?

04.06.2014 1:03, Irina Nikulina:

Hedya nubiferana?

04.06.2014 0:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudeustrotia candidula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 0:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pseudeustrotia candidula.

04.06.2014 0:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 0:53, Basil Sergienko:

It actually Jodis lactearia

04.06.2014 0:44, Basil Sergienko:

In fact, we should not rush to scatter, in my opinion is a viridata. Regarding the signs, you can see how people are trying to find here
http://www.entomo.pl/forum/viewtopic.php?f=87&t=23491
Incidentally, all right scattered

04.06.2014 0:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea sordens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 0:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia suasa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 0:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia suasa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 0:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia nebulosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.06.2014 0:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wow, never at such a miracle ever seen.

03.06.2014 23:54, Yuri Semejkin:

View defined not only by the presented pictures, but also transmitted live model. It's her group of which it is engaged.
The catalogs of a lot of things there, like everybody knows it. The blue nobody republished, did not elaborate, not complements ........

03.06.2014 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scattered in a short time: a sign of the faithful. The truth is that I can do only 6 numbers (work two days in a row).

03.06.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Herminia tarsicrinalis / Nikolai Vladimirov Herminia tarsipennalis / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree, stand clear.

03.06.2014 23:40, Irina Nikulina:

And that's exactly tarsicrinalis? No characteristic brown stripes ... more like aHerminia tarsipennalis

03.06.2014 23:34, Irina Nikulina:

In this feature, and I gave a link. If it works, there is need to review all the photos - on some fringe and yellow / reddish color

03.06.2014 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2014 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my opinion it's really Chlorissa sloraria: external border is not the front wings are yellow.
In viridata white border. This difference, known to me to coordinate. We must wait and see what people have to say.

03.06.2014 23:16, Irina Nikulina:

He doubted the loyalty of its last definition. According to Diagnose http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Chlorissa_Cloraria is likely,Chlorissa slorariaPlease help experts. Some of the other pictures on this page, too, have raised doubts.

03.06.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.06.2014 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.06.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To all the participants! If somewhere suddenly notice any discrepancy temetike time or somewhere, something should be corrected, please report directly to this page. After all, by two moderators for such an array of photos, which is already available on the site are not physically keep up .... Thanks in advance for your support :)

03.06.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, if you know what to write, then write :) If that is not so: we now have the ability to edit. The main thing that has been written on the subject line: "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age" All that is not written on the topic will be ruthlessly deleted ... . At least me :)

03.06.2014 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gluphisia crenata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

03.06.2014 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gluphisia crenata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

03.06.2014 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you :)

03.06.2014 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.06.2014 21:34, Basil Sergienko:

thalassina-bright and beautiful as the contigua

03.06.2014 21:24, Basil Sergienko:

Gluphisia crenata

03.06.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Notodonta torvathis?

03.06.2014 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Understood .... Well, changeable, though, I will say :)

03.06.2014 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudosciaphila branderiana / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

03.06.2014 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudosciaphila branderiana / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

03.06.2014 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma metzneriana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eucosma metzneriana: doubt is discarded :)

03.06.2014 20:13, Irina Nikulina:

Eucosma tundrana? (doubt between her andEucosma metzneriana)

03.06.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adoxophyes orana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adoxophyes orana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it seems Hedya ochroleucana is. Nubiferana crowds today I fly ... This is somewhat different. Let's wait that says Alexander.

03.06.2014 19:17, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Hedya ochroleucana? http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Hedya_Ochroleucana Doubts were aboutHedya nubiferana

03.06.2014 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Even hard to say to be honest ..... vpominat (

03.06.2014 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Balcony truly magical: left to smoke and sits :) After a night of fishing remained ....
I put until inaccurate required: Reaffirmation / retraction. I have to be confused.

03.06.2014 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Axylia putris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 18:33, Anna Gerasimova:

That is, it turns out that it is better to write something than not to write anything?

03.06.2014 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Axylia putris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you. What then glucan something like today .... I do not have my strength (

03.06.2014 18:25, Irina Nikulina:

No, not alone, many of them were. And she flew again (

03.06.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.06.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Axylia putriswithout question. It's not one of this butterfly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29798?

03.06.2014 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It must be time to wait. Gluck has not yet been disinfected (
I went to dinner :)

03.06.2014 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 18:11, Irina Nikulina:

Well, did not the third time, it seems)

03.06.2014 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Axylia putris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, what can you do ..... (

03.06.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite significantly: first color closer to the root of the wing :) And Abrostola asclepiadis more "gray". This is my private ..
Yes, and in my city: there it is very common (also private) :)

03.06.2014 17:58, Irina Nikulina:

Fly (

03.06.2014 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

And how it differs fromAbrostola asclepiadis? About tracks I know :)

03.06.2014 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Again flew :) recovered is (

03.06.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 17:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola triplasia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm not the determining poubiral :))

03.06.2014 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here I remember nothing: she is flying now and we will have to fly right up to September :)

03.06.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

different color, pattern and size of the same :), respectively, until said fine, there were questions :)

03.06.2014 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 17:43, Irina Nikulina:

I reminisce something, do not know how effectively))

03.06.2014 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you.

03.06.2014 17:42, Irina Nikulina:

Undecided post (

03.06.2014 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks :) In both ranges ... Just cho shipped it in another form and a balcony:): http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29719

03.06.2014 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is necessary to think and remember :) (I myself) :)

03.06.2014 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

No problem :)

03.06.2014 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oligia strigilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.06.2014 17:39, Irina Nikulina:

Abrostola triplasia ?

03.06.2014 17:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia nebulosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.06.2014 17:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliothis peltigera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.06.2014 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Obviously melanistic, whose question? that is the same size now flying on "the balcony of the magical"? :)

03.06.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Stalled with this hefty cutworms :) And from this small: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29771
Alexander, nothing for him to say you can not?

03.06.2014 17:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agreed :)

03.06.2014 17:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On it, my dear (catch is now at home) :) It should be the forum throw it seems

03.06.2014 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 17:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

03.06.2014 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clearly this makes it clear photo # 29782

03.06.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 17:06, Irina Nikulina:

Autographa excelsa? (confused flight of time, in the majority of East Cove - iyud-August, even the end of July Set)

03.06.2014 17:05, Irina Nikulina:

Autographa excelsa ?

03.06.2014 16:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Again on the balcony? if the moth, I do not know these may moth?

03.06.2014 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree, I even about Russia pechus :) and the fauna of the world forget. Basil did not "complain" the lack of information :), take it from sites that you looked out there and spread there.

03.06.2014 16:39, Irina Nikulina:

I think it's Udea .. Perhaps,Udea sviridovi?

03.06.2014 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia subfusca / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.06.2014 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put to the true definition of what S. subfusca :)

03.06.2014 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aethes margaritana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 16:15, Irina Nikulina:

Scoparia subfusca? http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Scoparia_Subfusca There are doubts between it and theScoparia basistrigalis

03.06.2014 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

View will not prevent in any case, if it is valid at the moment :) And as a butterfly you can drag if it is defined incorrectly. Forms must be created on the site is not only based on the Sinev. After all, the name of the site from the "catalog of butterflies of the world", however. A Sinev only Russian covers. So be kind until a certain time, if it is not in the directory of the site.However, the more I checked several sources if any before creating.

03.06.2014 15:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, described a kind of Southern Japanese islands, Exterior http://www.museum.osakafu-u.ac.jp/html/en/material/detail.php?id=657, to put it mildly is not very suitable. This is a photo of the holotype. I do what I do not want to say, except, do not rush to create new pages is not clear what we are dealing with. Propushenny at Sineva species vie for the new Russia, the overriding kakogoto species.It can say Margherita Ponomarenko, and after that to create a new page, if necessary, or replace an existing one, if the kind previously listed under another name. :)))

03.06.2014 15:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not see her any synonym. Neither here nor Japs: http://www.jpmoth.org/Yponomeutidae/Yponomeutinae/Aindex.html Not for Global Names Index: http://gni.globalnames.org/name_strings?page=6&search_term=ns%3AYPO*

03.06.2014 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, are you sure that your page does not exist? that it has no synonym. or vice versa, it redefined what kind. or a new kind for Russia? Then, Yuri, it is desirable to specify article where this species is given, and by whom it was considered earlier if thought :).

03.06.2014 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C a new kind of (not in the catalog, and had to do) :) Now we must take the Old somewhere .....

03.06.2014 13:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yponomeuta griseatus.

03.06.2014 13:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Yponomeuta griseatus Moriuti, 1977 identified the Ponomarenko Margarita BPI FEB RAS

03.06.2014 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 11:56, Shamil Murtazin:

When you look at any photo in the group - 29407, 29403, etc.

extreme photo (29408) in the side of a menu is repeated twice.
Although, at the opening of the pictures 29408 everything is fine.

03.06.2014 10:51, Shamil Murtazin:

here, apparently, also to cook? )

03.06.2014 10:39, Shamil Murtazin:

and againLycaena helle

03.06.2014 10:39, Shamil Murtazin:

separate with photos 29682 please
SupposeLycaena helle

03.06.2014 10:36, Shamil Murtazin:

Hopefully, with male and female guessing)
That's a ... Now we see more angles, difficult to see underside.

03.06.2014 10:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Pieris napi

03.06.2014 10:33, Shamil Murtazin:

SupposeLycaena helle

03.06.2014 10:29, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena helle?

03.06.2014 10:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena helle, female

03.06.2014 10:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena phlaeas(by analogy with another individual photos)

03.06.2014 10:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena phlaeas(by analogy with another individual photos)

03.06.2014 10:18, Shamil Murtazin:

with photos 29684 Please separate into a separate group. thank.

03.06.2014 8:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 8:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudopanthera macularia / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 8:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oligia strigilis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well all tired today all :) This can not determine in any way ....

03.06.2014 1:07, Shamil Murtazin:

link was gone. there is no number six, do not look :)

03.06.2014 0:45, Peter Khramov:

What a popular topic ...
ZY Shamil gruzani on a thread exchanger examples archives, I experiment with your files ...

03.06.2014 0:36, Shamil Murtazin:

also gone. I could - it has placed. Random photos scattered wild ... :)

03.06.2014 0:27, Shamil Murtazin:

Pseudopanthera macularia

03.06.2014 0:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

not a matter of just a few days ago hastened, and all definitions posletali, now I leave tomorrow we arrange :)

03.06.2014 0:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, in the process. Let's sign, I'll make comments to you then twice the work to do;)

03.06.2014 0:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Lampropteryx suffumata?
closer not found. confuses double a spot on the front wing near the body on a dark field. Photos of this species as single spot.

03.06.2014 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.06.2014 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.06.2014 0:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 0:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 0:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena helle?

03.06.2014 0:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 0:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, you're kind of going to sign?

03.06.2014 0:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parasemia plantaginis / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.06.2014 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa cardui / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.06.2014 0:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Boloria euphrosyne?

03.06.2014 0:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Boloria euphrosyne?

02.06.2014 23:57, Shamil Murtazin:

The underside seems not. If undetectable - delete. Thanks =)

02.06.2014 23:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena helle, female

02.06.2014 23:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Celastrina argiolus?

02.06.2014 23:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena helle?

02.06.2014 23:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Vanessa cardui

02.06.2014 23:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Parasemia plantaginis, samEts - Vasiliy Feoktistov

02.06.2014 23:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Araschnia levana

02.06.2014 23:36, Shamil Murtazin:

Lycaena phlaeas

02.06.2014 23:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Petrophora chlorosata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.06.2014 23:14, Shamil Murtazin:

Size of the archive to download (50 MB) is actually less. I do not know for what reasons.
Archive weights 46 kopecks meters loaded, then issued a message about the end of the response time (there may be a limit on the cache?), Ie, the server stops to keep the link and stupidly interrupted downloads and even an error does not return.Archive 16.5 MB gives error ngix - entity is too large
Only the archive at least 10 MB (or more precisely 9.72 MB) is swallowed. Plus the auto-detection is not working.
And the number of two - unpacking archives and adding files to the gallery there is a kind of strange, disordered way. Ie halyards have named Image01, Image02 ... and we get the order (spied): 03, 08, 02, 10 ... I do not see a series of ...something can not interpret ...
Thus, the work is much more complicated: grouped by name pictures are leaving and, at times, are not there. The size of the injected file of 10 MB suggests a maximum of 20 pictures, and in the middle - 10-12.
Can I do something?

02.06.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Slow and very trusting: a man not afraid to completely :) So I'm sorry for them, people often kill alas, taking the snakes (feet, not really like all lizards), although they are quite harmless .... Therefore, it is such a rare and Apparently (

02.06.2014 22:19, Shamil Murtazin:

cool :) beast crawls quickly? ..
Butterfly then still bear. photos only first memory scattered in groups: who, where, etc. sfotkatsya
Of course it would be quite good hawk from a caterpillar to bring up - I like the process.

02.06.2014 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalacropterix graslinella / Tentatively identified / Ilia Ustiantcev.

02.06.2014 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Told me at the forum that it is someone likePhalacropterix graslinellaview in the eighth region, there are one of a kind it. Therefore, the best times to go and stand as an imprecise definition. Sophisticated they ......

02.06.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I quite agree: this is not necessary :)

02.06.2014 17:39, Peter Khramov:

I think it's the right situation, but time will tell if that is not the case, it is technically very fixable.

02.06.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I add a separate post:
I talked a little with this cute creation and let go.
Glad :)

02.06.2014 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Congratulations :) Shamil waiting there in the photo butterfly in the statement signed by: "Now this has not seen even once" - a male-bear Parasemia plantaginis (Linnaeus, 1758): http: // lepidoptera. ru / taxonomy / 6672 (this is the case, suggested).
I too went to the Vladimir region 05/31/2014. The truth is not photographed almost as collecting beetles.The only thing that managed to find male sfotat is very rare legless lizard in breeding plumage: "anguis fragile" Anguis fragilis Linnaeus, 1758 : http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CB%EE % EC% EA% E0% FF_% E2% E5% F0% E5% F2% E5% ED% E8% F6% E0
"declared a type Annex III of the Bern Convention on the Conservation of Wild Flora and Fauna and Natural Habitats" , however.
Now here is a great show animal:

05.31.2014 Mr.Vladimir region, Petushki district., Env. der. Older Omutischi.

02.06.2014 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is worth noting that we can edit / delete only what has been written there by the user. From myself there's nothing we can not do, so still there writing specification as possible. For example: the name of the subspecies (if you know) no one for you to enter not able: initially only you out of your LK :)

02.06.2014 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, please contact your account ("uplylo already"): http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29600
There I outlined what to do: dried and previously uploaded four photos of living - a butterfly and it is necessary to link to the group. I can not do it.

02.06.2014 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

!NB!
Please don't touch with bare hands chrysalises and larvae of Lasiocampidae and Lymantriidae. This may turn out quite bad.
Larva has small hairs which it later wreathe in chrysalis. I've just taken such a chrysalis and the hairs stuck in my skin. I washed it thoroughly water and soap, not sure what's gonna be. Here's some info about Lasiocampidae hairs: http://www.bumblebee.org/invertebrates/Lepidoptera9.htm. Can cause irritation.

02.06.2014 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

I've also applied :) In the future, when viewing, I'll edit where necessary.

02.06.2014 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plutella xylostella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.06.2014 12:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah thanks. This should have been done: useful for the future. Even run-in, poudalyat sorts "for identification" and the like, it is not necessary in this period was :)

02.06.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amata phegea / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

02.06.2014 12:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In Pavonia five ages. Well, and pear, I think, too :)

02.06.2014 12:19, Peter Khramov:

Now, modernizing and edit this field (users often write in it something belonging to completely different fields). This field is free, so please pay special attention to the correct shift data and do not be lazy to write in the comments if you notice Kaki glitches.

02.06.2014 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

02.06.2014 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.06.2014 12:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why four? before pupation did not five?

02.06.2014 12:02, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, Alexander, now you can change the data that have to be clarified juzverej form (shape, subspecies, etc. at the top of the photo). These changes are published in the same way as all the other when moving ph.

02.06.2014 8:39, Andrei Komrakov:

Clearly, thanks!

02.06.2014 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There they are inaccurate, and therefore require clarifications. In my opinion there is generally only one griseata from Estonia. Sam-I had to griseata not put them out of Ramenskoye district. as the place is 10 km away. from my place of residence. And in their exact I will not tolerate any clear evidence to :)

02.06.2014 7:45, Andrei Komrakov:

But online 2 ex. Ramenskoye district of classified T.griseata. I wonder: on what basis?

02.06.2014 7:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that's not an option :) What I have not seen (and they are commonplace everywhere we have): all this is the present band. We apparently need to be guided in determining the notorious catalog Sineva (distribution).

02.06.2014 6:57, Andrei Komrakov:

The discussion on the site it was felt that to separate from T.comae T.griseata only the genitals. But here the Irish guys once famously their appearance sorted (pink-red band across the wings): http://www.habitas.org.uk/moths/species.asp?item=5755

02.06.2014 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.06.2014 5:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.06.2014 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I add that according to the list in the eighth Sineva comae region exactly there, but griseata questionable. It is also worth considering.

01.06.2014 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And what comae not satisfied? She somehow always fully in the MO, but with griseata once again incomprehensible situation. We'll wait until someone else judge and explain :)

01.06.2014 23:32, Andrei Komrakov:

Instead Timandra griseata?

01.06.2014 23:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.06.2014 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Timandra comae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.06.2014 23:07, Shamil Murtazin:

I went to the mountains. Tested net :)
Without hard trap house.
He took only hawk. Even the appearance will not tell - tossed in the freezer. A bunch of photos of butterflies. Gallery, hold on! :)
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526325&st=150#

01.06.2014 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eupithecia vulgata / Confidently identified / Female / Basil Sergienko.

01.06.2014 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By vulgata and postavvlyu. Thank you, Basil.

01.06.2014 22:49, Basil Sergienko:

Not really good shot, nothing else, the female can not offer vulgata

01.06.2014 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm afraid of myself, to be honest. Because not spread, though arrive in abundance ...

01.06.2014 21:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergienko come look. I have no great need in appearance (photo) Eupithecia try not to define.

01.06.2014 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula nemoraria / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

01.06.2014 20:29, Basil Sergienko:

Scopula nemoraria

01.06.2014 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea crenata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.06.2014 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, you look it, please, and then today I threw in a hurry and left, and he did not have time to look :) Nothing can be said?

01.06.2014 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ostrinia nubilalis / Confidently identified / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.06.2014 20:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis punctinalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.06.2014 20:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immorata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.06.2014 18:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Andrei Komrakov.

01.06.2014 18:31, Andrei Komrakov:

Rivula sericealis (Scopoli, 1763)

01.06.2014 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rivula sericealis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.06.2014 11:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah. And the first photo on the site :) eight regions much more interesting in itself harbors. Although it seems that everything has been studied for a long time every year I find someone - something new :) This year, of male butterflies
Phillodesma japonica (view recently confirmed in MO) and then it would be: a dream is :)

01.06.2014 11:42, kirsanova Evgenia:

Sorry, that if you delete a comment that overwhelmed impression - a stunning discovery !!! In this article, I received answers to questions long been tormenting me!

01.06.2014 11:18, kirsanova Evgenia:

This type of butterfly EUPLOEA CORE http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23586 same thing happens, the male releases falloblaster orange color, about 5 mm long and it happens at a time when it is in my hands. That this phenomenon occurs at the very moment when I take her rib cage =)
www.butterflu.ru

01.06.2014 11:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here is a very rare type, see the distribution and the number of photos on the Internet. Does not match :)

01.06.2014 6:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Xestia c-nigrum / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.06.2014 4:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This photo overstepped the mark "900" :)

01.06.2014 0:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Epiblema scutulana / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.06.2014 0:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Epiblema scutulana / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2014 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clepsis rogana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2014 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

31.05.2014 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.05.2014 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

31.05.2014 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

31.05.2014 21:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ptycholoma lecheana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2014 21:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ptycholoma lecheana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2014 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, please write a valid name, but not synonymous: so it will be easier :)

31.05.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Papilio maackii / Female.

31.05.2014 18:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Malacosoma castrensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2014 18:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Malacosoma castrensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.05.2014 10:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Achillides maackii female

31.05.2014 10:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Alcina on flowers Chelidonium majus

31.05.2014 6:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sciota hostilis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.05.2014 6:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sciota hostilis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.05.2014 1:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pampering, not self-indulgence, and four kinds of Micra already downloaded .... And again in the morning a couple of species will be at least :)

31.05.2014 1:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.05.2014 1:43, Basil Sergienko:

There are no other similar kind

31.05.2014 1:12, Peter Khramov:

Do not nafig. Cleaving lamps - it was too hardcore for a mere mortal. Will 250 at hand, put it, and that truncated. All the same floor balcony for pampering.

30.05.2014 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you! In fact I have a magical balcony :)

30.05.2014 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Defining my right, congratulations on such an interesting view. Budashkin YI confirmed 100%.

30.05.2014 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, that's another angle. The truth and the other butterfly :)

30.05.2014 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lomographa temerata / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.05.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It has long been said already .... stand until inaccurate (though few doubt) :)

30.05.2014 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Angle "neither here nor there" (Pyrgus alveus?

30.05.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More specific: this butterfly have to tie in a group photo # 29491; # 29492; # 29493; # 29500
This same situation that was Igor: it is impossible to relate in any way.

30.05.2014 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Opensource projects, eh ... nervously smoke aside :) "Magic" I have a balcony, but .... Already in 2010, the beetle-barbel Exocentrus punctipennis Mulsant et Guillebeu, 1856 was the first time for the Defense Set your humble servant from that balcony (in the book have Shapovalova). Link to my bug: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=238832&view=findpost&p=1075833 And now ..... probably Butterfly Miracles, however :)

30.05.2014 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, do not rush, photos for three years constantly in another way. :) Can be more opinions, I consult. before scoring Sineva .somneny not bіlo now looked at other books, but the southern view, Moscow region, a very interesting discovery. :) Wait a visual signal, and then, if an error did not want to bother again, Peter. :)

30.05.2014 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Infu add?

30.05.2014 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

However, the species is not listed in the notorious Sinev to my home, the eighth region. The answer is: sfotat at home balcony in the city Railway, Moscow region :)

30.05.2014 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander again. Comments :) wash

30.05.2014 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalonidia contractana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2014 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov Not identified.

30.05.2014 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not keep the transfer again somehow :(

30.05.2014 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2014 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2014 10:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That fact did not know that this banal Moth in QC home areas number: http://kkmo2.verhovye.ru/rb/bspozvon/lithina_chlorosata.php
There, where it is full of photos, and to the border with the Moscow region only some 15 kilometers away :)

30.05.2014 10:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And apparently a bad case :(

30.05.2014 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

30.05.2014 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Less than three years :)

30.05.2014 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That same butterfly that http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29492. "Final result" :)
Merge the group had not received any :(
Peter, do please :)

30.05.2014 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.05.2014 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.05.2014 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.05.2014 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.05.2014 9:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cochylis hybridella / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

30.05.2014 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Question mark on the species or subspecies bearing these perelivnits?

30.05.2014 7:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

160 watts: DRV means (throttle-free). Good stuff, but have one significant drawback of such a lamp in comparison with the XRD (run with restrictor) is available: it is impossible to split the flask to obtain a pure UV (in some cases it is required).Insects fly in fact not born as such, but in the ultraviolet part of the spectrum: as the same, and flowers have ultraviolet mark, which attract insects as pollinators. Of course, if you catch a blank UV protection is necessary to take care of the eye: vision is very much affected by this, but that's another story.That signed something: apparently non-flying weather affects ..... knotted, and that such Makar you can write a treatise :)

30.05.2014 2:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus argyrognomon / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.05.2014 1:20, Irina Nikulina:

Plebejus argyrognomon

30.05.2014 1:20, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkPlebejus pseudaegon

30.05.2014 1:19, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkPlebejus pseudaegon

30.05.2014 0:44, Evgeny Komarov:

OK!

30.05.2014 0:13, Irina Nikulina:

I wanted to write, but it turns out, I already wrote about it in April on the pages species Chrysozephyrus brillantinus and smaragdinus)

30.05.2014 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, Sasha, and it is true Sinev Neozephyrus smaragdinus. I should have right to determine (

29.05.2014 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Probably should obїedinyat page with Neozephyrus smaragdinus

29.05.2014 23:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.05.2014 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus japonicus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.05.2014 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neozephyrus japonicus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.05.2014 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrium eximius / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.05.2014 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus japonicus

29.05.2014 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Neozephyrus japonicus

29.05.2014 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Satyrium eximius

29.05.2014 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysozephyrus smaragdinus

29.05.2014 21:34, Peter Khramov:

So this 160 W mercury ...

29.05.2014 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, although the issue was to Peter, but I corrected this gaffe :) Generic name of the species lured :)

29.05.2014 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Satyrium spini Saturnia spini.

29.05.2014 20:13, Yaroslava Zhdanova:

Thank you. It is a pity that no Kai, but mom says Silkworms are very beautiful. She faded yesterday and has already become 3 cm and thicker.

29.05.2014 19:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! As this picture here? It's Saturnia spini.

29.05.2014 18:30, Shamil Murtazin:

They say that animals with a similar way of life similar.
This is from this angle looks like a bat :)

29.05.2014 18:22, Shamil Murtazin:

What mohnashka :)

29.05.2014 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euplexia lucipara / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.05.2014 8:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is also interested in information on Myanmar, and makes it possible for the abolition of visas - Bangladesh.

29.05.2014 5:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The name of the subspecies can finish in the LC.

29.05.2014 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Apatura metis / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

29.05.2014 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Apatura ilia / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

29.05.2014 4:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, here it is happiness something :) I spilozomy once again and fly (But flying mass of Krupnyakov scoopsAgrotis segetum. Not Fota and catch them for a long time ... And what light, if not a secret?

29.05.2014 2:12, Peter Khramov:

Arrived spilozomy.

29.05.2014 1:31, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura ilia

29.05.2014 1:17, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura ilia ?

29.05.2014 1:16, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura metis, subspecies A. m. substituta Butler, 1873

29.05.2014 1:15, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura metis, subspecies A. m. substituta Butler, 1873?

29.05.2014 1:15, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura metis, subspecies A. m. substituta Butler, 1873?

29.05.2014 1:14, Irina Nikulina:

I thinkApatura metis, subspecies A. m. substituta Butler, 1873

28.05.2014 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

28.05.2014 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

28.05.2014 23:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

28.05.2014 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, no, it's just a residential house in the center of the city of 150,000th ... Reluctance to attract undue attention. It is enough to glazed balconies and banal sheets in it, highlighted by two black UV sberegaykami to 26 W + spetstrubka to illuminate the desert terrarium (provides an increased level of UV): Repti Glo UVB 8.0; 15w and will fly even in urban illumination. Checked time :)

28.05.2014 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Speaking of neighbors do not quite understand. Well, we took 160 watt lamp. And put the screen in front of it, ie, it is between the lamp and the houses opposite. Light will not be greater than that from a brightly lit room. Kaki troubles?

28.05.2014 23:10, Peter Khramov:

I'm going to include a semaphore ...

28.05.2014 21:44, Shamil Murtazin:

How not to disappoint, but it is certainly not Kai.
It looks likeLymantria dispar

28.05.2014 21:15, Yaroslava Zhdanova:

This caterpillar crawled to the feet of the Pope, as we sat in a cafe. I want to raise it from a butterfly. But I do not know who it is. It would be great if Bear Kai, I did a report on it in school. But mom says another. She eats only the leaves of maple and birch bit. Do not eat clover, daisies, strawberries, plantain, leshchinu. Help her identify.I want her to grow into a butterfly and release. It runs fast if a light. And it is not minimized.

28.05.2014 21:07, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I braked very chtot. Now Dial.

28.05.2014 19:43, Shamil Murtazin:

ha, class! I never would have thought that it is this color :)

28.05.2014 19:29, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander read, thank you. Temko do with the results of "experimental."
Since the main task - the definition of a particular object, you first will train on other materials that anymore.

28.05.2014 19:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, thanks for the advice! When will be able to choose - will choose Catocala =)
Now take off everything, that comes across his arm.
As long as the timing is not very volley guess, but somewhere just I can not go yet. So until now I did not go for night pavlinoglazki (in any form). It seems that for gusyankami already go :)

28.05.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Female / Andrei Komrakov.

28.05.2014 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Female / Andrei Komrakov.

28.05.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I stand to Britomartis since Andrew convinced laying male with everything owed :)

28.05.2014 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

I wrote in PM :)

28.05.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, if there is interest, I can recommend it as a target for shooting eggs "Ribbons" Catocala sp. and the like. It will be really interesting :)

28.05.2014 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, on the Russian names discussed enough with them :)
We do not discuss more about what I asked you, and that began to discuss. On Saturday call waiting, by the way, and ends in May :)

28.05.2014 15:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Violence, dried. Torn right rear wing ...

28.05.2014 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Test right right
Everything is fine now, thank you.

28.05.2014 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha amoenella / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

28.05.2014 14:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Ypsolopha amoenella (Christoph, 1882) identified the Margarita Ponomarenko. BPI FEB RAS.

28.05.2014 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On DRL / DRV in my terms, when in front so the same house can easily brick instead of butterflies fly from the "grateful" neighbors. Poslabzhe artillery use, but also quite effective. Besides it any fluorescent lamp that contains mercury inherently "mercury" :)

28.05.2014 13:33, Peter Khramov:

No, well, more mercury bulbs go - at not sports; -))

28.05.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Light" and we must all arrive (I have a balcony equipped to flew) :)

28.05.2014 13:04, Peter Khramov:

And about all the Russian names have discussed rail more than once.

28.05.2014 12:58, Peter Khramov:

Yes, everything seems to be fine stands ...

28.05.2014 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Test n ht right

28.05.2014 12:51, Peter Khramov:

He went on payments to the pension fund and has not returned.

28.05.2014 12:50, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. And I have no such not arrive late.

28.05.2014 11:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where the salary for May?

28.05.2014 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I wrote to him there already, what to do :) Now he is not home and I can not move. If tomorrow, alas.

28.05.2014 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, the information must be transferred to the main page, while Peter did not remove :)

28.05.2014 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I realized already .... take another (And I have to add the form to the Old vain ... (((

28.05.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander. This is me today, in the morning hastily sfotal. Other angles are later. Now this kind of "like mosquitoes" shrugs at the balcony :)

28.05.2014 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya nubiferana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.05.2014 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very bad angle, very bad view diagnostic signs drawing, photos of such species, it is desirable to do in the plane of the wing, and not from above :)

28.05.2014 10:15, Shamil Murtazin:

At beggar eggs, shall we say, not textured.


But at some very interesting :) And it's certainly not a butterfly.

28.05.2014 10:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ptycholoma lecheanum Ptycholoma lecheana.

28.05.2014 10:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I hasten to disappoint, this is not a new species, it humped latynskoe name, this type of page you want to delete. and the very picture I move, where he will place :)

28.05.2014 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Memo to postpone not penetrated again. Peter, think about it.

28.05.2014 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This female. Only nominative subspecies, not palavanikus

28.05.2014 8:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I like to deal with this race. In this photo C. malayensis.Samets. Nominate subspecies. Excuse me, that first of all introduced into error.

28.05.2014 6:53, Andrei Komrakov:

Thank you! The female is likely, too?

28.05.2014 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Male / Andrei Komrakov.

28.05.2014 5:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Male / Andrei Komrakov.

28.05.2014 5:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thus here .... I'm going to work .... And the new site for the view :)

28.05.2014 2:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.05.2014 2:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Andrei Komrakov.

28.05.2014 2:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Melitaea britomartis / Confidently identified / Male / Andrei Komrakov.

28.05.2014 1:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Here you can see a little bit worse, but, like, too Britomartis.

28.05.2014 1:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Now you can see. And it's true - Britomartis ... :)

28.05.2014 0:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sciota rhenella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.05.2014 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.05.2014 22:27, Shamil Murtazin:

this "aunt" like something out of the can hit the road :)

27.05.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

27.05.2014 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius ultramarinus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.05.2014 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius orientalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.05.2014 20:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius orientalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.05.2014 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina filipjevi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.05.2014 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina filipjevi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.05.2014 20:43, Irina Nikulina:

Favonius ultramarinus

27.05.2014 20:43, Irina Nikulina:

Favonis orientalis

27.05.2014 20:43, Irina Nikulina:

Favonis orientalis

27.05.2014 20:42, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina filipjevi

27.05.2014 20:42, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina filipjevi

27.05.2014 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexander Boldyrev.

27.05.2014 18:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just struck is a miracle ....

27.05.2014 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

27.05.2014 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectropis crepuscularia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.05.2014 8:29, Andrei Komrakov:

Did.

27.05.2014 7:39, Anna Gerasimova:

specifically on this picture - my husband. family row)))

27.05.2014 6:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrhoe alternata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.05.2014 6:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rivata starts to fly later (June). The soul to the E. alternata is longer bear :).

27.05.2014 2:35, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the level of other authors, which is on the site - such a thing, probably, will be based on the section of the collection. As for the types of illustration fotami from the gallery - I do, but not always immediately after the download.

27.05.2014 2:27, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, there were doubts about rivata, I decided to play it safe

27.05.2014 2:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Pay attention to the shape it is necessary to process the valve. The images of the genitals increase acceptable, but a bad angle: side view of the need, not the bottom. It is not clear.

26.05.2014 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think so, too. Quite a she. But again the question raised doubts ....... what else?

26.05.2014 21:29, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Alexander, it's all clear, my question is for Peter, it is desirable to more options when uploading the picture ...

26.05.2014 21:16, Irina Nikulina:

Epirrhoe alternata ?

26.05.2014 21:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Anatoly, I its definition, put down. On this site you can not put down the definition of the author, who is not registered on the site. if the author is registered, it can put down a moderator.

26.05.2014 20:26, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

Peter! Uploaded today 2 photo Pleurota pyropella. Also there are 2 questions, can they discussed earlier, I do not know.
1. In the comments I wrote "Determination was conducted by photo. Identified Alexander Zhakov." Later, it was not added by me
"05.26.2014 15:04 Alexander Zhakov: Data on the photos changed.
Anatoly Kuzmin → Alexander Zhakov."
It would be more convenient that when uploading the picture was given the opportunity to determine not specify in the comments. Such a possibility is, for example, the site http://www.plantarium.ru
2. On Pleurota pyropella have not had photographs. I'm not clear how and in what time frame will appear and if you see the photo on the description page.

26.05.2014 18:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya nubiferana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 18:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ethmia bipunctella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

26.05.2014 18:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ethmia bipunctella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

26.05.2014 18:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pechipogo strigilata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pechipogo strigilata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 18:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ostrinia nubilalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 18:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphomia sociella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Montescardia tessulatellus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elaphria venustula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elaphria venustula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Earias clorana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 17:43, Andrei Komrakov:

http://lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Melitaea_Britomartis

26.05.2014 17:42, Andrei Komrakov:

And you should pay attention to? I put pictures of these two instances, unfortunately, only this increase. Here are figures for Atala and Britomartis. Attention is drawn to the difference in the processes of the valve (pointed to Atala).

26.05.2014 17:36, Peter Khramov:

It is possible that different types of the same figures may be, and within species variation itself is quite uncommon. In general, yes, indicating the species would be nice picture ... Or even two foty - Increasing numbers / letters and the general appearance of the wings.

26.05.2014 16:47, Shamil Murtazin:

and that,Ethmia bipunctelladoes not fit? =)

26.05.2014 15:17, Yaroslava Zhdanova:

I have a photo of the poster with the alphabet of butterflies, which hung in the house of butterflies in Tenerife. He is a little different. And of Six wrong.

26.05.2014 15:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Anatoliy Kuzmin Alexandr Zhakov.

26.05.2014 15:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiblema grandaevana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.05.2014 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiblema grandaevana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.05.2014 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiblema grandaevana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.05.2014 15:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiblema grandaevana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.05.2014 15:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiblema grandaevana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.05.2014 10:40, Shamil Murtazin:

direct staging light =)
who keeps a flashlight?

26.05.2014 7:24, Shamil Murtazin:

There are eggsDiaphora mendica. We will try)

26.05.2014 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male.

26.05.2014 6:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 6:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 6:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 6:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 6:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.05.2014 5:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 5:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.05.2014 1:44, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO most Atalia. But this kind of divination; valvae have to see. This can be done with a magnifying glass on a live butterfly or a soft, lightly squeezing her abdomen seemed to process the valve.

25.05.2014 17:42, Andrei Komrakov:

M.britomartis ♂?

25.05.2014 17:41, Andrei Komrakov:

M.britomartis ♂?

25.05.2014 5:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I would have put on Aglaia .... If it were not for DV. Here underside needs to be sure: it is for these friends to explain the easiest way .... And underside-and no ... (

25.05.2014 2:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

About Britomartis I have my doubts whatever the place of capture. It should be a male and a cook. And in the order of delirium: can, this is such an early aberrant diamine? :)

24.05.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Metallica there is not presented: Alexander do not have time to update. We are friends and we catch together :) Because I know. Will Metallica's for sure. And two of my beetle that is in the theme "With the new season of" lined. And much more :) Tomorrow I more closely related to your checkered. Now just a phone I can not check :) If I did not overtake anyone :)

24.05.2014 18:34, Andrei Komrakov:

The fact that North MO is different from the south - I will not argue. Somehow you with distrust to the correlation of the type and the place where it was caught. I want to note that: 1) contribute to climate change is quite a change in the area, 2) any entomological site requires constant changes and amendments. That is not to go: on insectamo.ru no marked for MO such notable appearance as Protaetia metallica (Herbst, 1782) that we (Lot. district) massively represented.

24.05.2014 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I used to go to Lotoshinsky not .... and in the nearby Volokolamsk too. Well, nothing to do at the North-West to the South MO :)

24.05.2014 15:40, Andrei Komrakov:

I do it for the first time we catch. And then in the area of ​​forest Lotoshinsky not solid. And food plants: rattle and Plantago lanceolata - in stock, a specific type of Veronica teucrium, but there are other 4 kinds of Veronica.

24.05.2014 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There she is from Silver-Prudskoy area and is the extreme south of the Defense Ministry and already there is a steppe is: are there other habitats and generally substantially different from all Lotoshinskogo district .....

24.05.2014 15:08, Andrei Komrakov:

On insectamo.ru it is, but the photo just larvae and pupae - no photos of adults. There is evidence that this - female M.britomartis (Alexei Belik, Saratov)

24.05.2014 14:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Britomartis like as not, MO :)
Andrew, look, please do it on insectamo.ru. Maybe you find. Unfortunately I myself can not do that right now.

24.05.2014 14:00, Andrei Komrakov:

Melitaea britomartis (Assmann 1847)?

24.05.2014 13:57, Andrei Komrakov:

Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775) ♀

24.05.2014 12:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here purpuraria she begs for "purple" FIHM that is translated from the Latin, and by the way is called almost everywhere in Russian. And here at cruentaria Russian name nowhere and only occasionally it "bloody" happens. Or am I wrong?
But Russian names are not needed at all. This I support.And so to all white and whiteflies "cabbage" call or all brown Nymphalidae "Chocolate": indeed they are called in the people.

24.05.2014 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong, is not allocated is not bold, not italic

24.05.2014 12:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Something buggy selection in the comments I tried to highlight avilnyh

24.05.2014 12:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, offer, Russian names not to touch, or we got into a heap, not extricate ourselves. We begin to give their names, arguing what the right which is not correct, and so on to infinity, there is no code of Russian names and all well bring an argument that is not correct, as I want and call, there is no regulation.Once you reached into the pile, do not pull the rest. I called when the above have Russian names, another butterfly in the same, well, so be it. Do not look for truth where it can not be. Since there is no nyh Russian names :)

24.05.2014 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter now on Lythria :)
That is as it should be (at the page of the form did not write):
1) Lythria purpuraria (Linnaeus, 1758) purple moth: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/900-lythria-purpuraria
2) Lythria cruentaria (Hufnagel, 1767) Russian names there: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/901-lythria-cruentaria
And it really is a sound approach in my opinion.

24.05.2014 2:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ochepyatka (Claudia to be cleaned). The letter T sinks :)

24.05.2014 2:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let's upper timeline zaymёmsya Wait. While time I have to work a bit.
A uchtu notes: simply will not engage in polemics with such strung personalities :)

24.05.2014 2:49, Marija Jaunkunga:

Thank you!

24.05.2014 2:35, Peter Khramov:

Step away:
As described in the next topic now admin / modernization has no unconditional obligations. Ho. I believe that the Admin Newbie / modernization is still somewhat more responsibility, because they are the face of the site. A filter market because they have little more than ordinary users.And it is highly desirable to be on the public well ooooooooooochen calm and unemotional as possible. Even when something really do not like. In addition, it is good to still write competently but without ochepyatka (dream out loud).

24.05.2014 2:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you better make me what I asked you (it's on the top of the edit line). Just going to edit the silence, leaving comments to the cause redakirovaniya. In order to avoid different situations. After all, people have a very inadequate response to jokes: even in the case of the pupa to the place was a joke.And then it will be written clearly why edited and all :)
Yes, and it is necessary to wipe out many of these lines too much. Well, because we talked on the phone about it.
Online high at me now except for visits to the field and work: Go in this case. Bosh will not flog: so be sure :)

24.05.2014 2:29, Peter Khramov:

Here I am saying that the described functionality is not exactly and exclusively to the social network. And since all the rules.

24.05.2014 2:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK :) .The word "nonsense": a lot of synonyms:
"absurd nonsense, bezlepitsa, rubbish, fresh-water sponge, brakozyabra, nonsense, nonsense, nonsense, nonsense, nonsense, game, trash, drebezden, firewood, heresy, nonsense, nonsense on vegetable oil, rubbish, zaviralnye ideas Labuda, labusnya, messy, lambada, fuel oil, mudistika, Moore mutota, mutoten, dregs, meat pies with apples,nonsense, absurdity, neskladitsy, absurdity, nesusvetitsa, okolesina, slaver, okolesnaya, stool, pornography, Porokhnya, blizzard, empty, nothing, millet, perest, boobs, AIDS, Natalie Trundy, trahomuden, trihomudiya, rot, poppycock, tyrli Myrli, plywood, garbage, Haruta, garbage, heromantiya, Herota, heroten, palmistry, hohloma, bollocks, hrenomut,fuck, crap, limericks, nonsense, nonsense on vegetable oil, chepuhovina, scales, sneeze, Chukhno, husks, Shirley Myrli, cracklings "
Sometimes just finishing off comments this user. As is the case with the same fly that you deleted :) Honestly I do not want anyone to swear, but when you read the next vyser ..... So please answer. Okay, enough about this: tired already ....

24.05.2014 1:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I would put at Aglaya. It seems, on the rear fenders to see the underside corresponding pattern.

23.05.2014 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Basil, suggesting relations administrator and moderators to find out in this thread or in person, rather than Palik. That theme, where you leave comments, concerns the relationship of ordinary users and admin / modders. OK?

23.05.2014 19:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aethes smeathmanniana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.05.2014 19:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aethes smeathmanniana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.05.2014 19:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aethes smeathmanniana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.05.2014 19:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aethes smeathmanniana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.05.2014 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe ferrugata / Tatyana Gordeeva Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Basil Sergienko.

23.05.2014 14:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By "correctly determined": Tatyana and Vasily? :)

23.05.2014 14:03, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

23.05.2014 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The key here is "flavipalpana" Do not casual its lytyni so called them: flavi means yellow :)

23.05.2014 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By Sinev region 6 in 22 species. For your region, I would have carried her to her without thinking too much and making a discount on the variability that the species existents :)

23.05.2014 11:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil is not Celypha flavipalpana, palps so bright, but flavipalpana two-tone, and this butterfly in the same tone :)

23.05.2014 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here she lepiforume: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Celypha_Flavipalpana
Alexander, check: it is in the region Shamil.

23.05.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I think in theCelypha flavipalpanaif palps light :)

23.05.2014 11:07, Peter Khramov:

Alex http://lepidoptera.ru/authors/1029, as far as I know, no catches, but only photographs, but very well-versed in the country.

23.05.2014 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Shamil there?, I'll think counsel. Palpa light, while cespitana they should be dark.

23.05.2014 8:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There are people who have been / caught in Laos? Need any information. Most interested in hotels.

22.05.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why the question mark? Will not be tolerated, WAIT.

22.05.2014 22:29, Shamil Murtazin:

Celypha cespitana? - Alexander Zhakov

22.05.2014 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Orgyia antiqua / Vitaly Gumenuk Orgyia recens / Dmitry Borisyuk.

22.05.2014 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, thank you notice: stand. And there is that base: http://insectamo.ru/hete/99-hete/lymantriidae/1217-orgyia-recens

22.05.2014 20:59, Dmitry Borisyuk:

IMHO, it is not Orgyia antiqua, andOrgyia recens

22.05.2014 15:42, Shamil Murtazin:

And I like the "type" of butterflies. It is interesting to look for a matching :)
Houses for directory look too =)

22.05.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.05.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis sappho / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.05.2014 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa indica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.05.2014 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa indica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.05.2014 12:26, Irina Nikulina:

Not, of course. At first glance, I would have sent her to Aglaia, but the genus Argynnis, given the many DV-species, is difficult for me) especially adippe-like group. Niobe, ksippa, adippa, nerippa ... There is also a vorax with coredippe available) Everything is clear with only nerippe. It is necessary to understand well.

22.05.2014 12:12, Irina Nikulina:

She zhe who is this?) Here I have my doubts between the 2 types of perlamutrovok, left to professionals.

22.05.2014 12:11, Shamil Murtazin:

And no, it is not (Melitaea sutschana meant)

22.05.2014 12:09, Irina Nikulina:

Shamil, Vladimir made the frame on supermakrorezhime, flash (but he cleaned the flash intensity on the macro to a minimum), and manual white balance ... I also like the Indian Admiral has turned out)

22.05.2014 11:59, Shamil Murtazin:

light cool ... how to do, interesting ...

22.05.2014 11:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Is it the same? =)

22.05.2014 11:13, Irina Nikulina:

Vanessa indica

22.05.2014 11:12, Irina Nikulina:

Vanessa indica

22.05.2014 11:11, Irina Nikulina:

Vanessa indica

22.05.2014 11:11, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis sappho

22.05.2014 11:10, Irina Nikulina:

Araschnia levana

22.05.2014 8:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I supposeLomographa temerata

22.05.2014 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.05.2014 1:22, Irina Nikulina:

Buck

22.05.2014 1:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antigius butleri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.05.2014 1:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes subhyalina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.05.2014 1:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptidea morsei / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.05.2014 1:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antigius butleri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.05.2014 0:53, Irina Nikulina:

Antigius butleri

22.05.2014 0:53, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes subhyalina

22.05.2014 0:53, Irina Nikulina:

Leptidea morsei

22.05.2014 0:52, Irina Nikulina:

Antigius butleri

21.05.2014 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis ino / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Brenthis ino / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Wagimo signata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atara arata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atara arata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis ruslana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 22:55, Irina Nikulina:

Atara arata

21.05.2014 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis ruslana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 22:55, Irina Nikulina:

Atara arata

21.05.2014 22:54, Irina Nikulina:

Wagimo signata

21.05.2014 22:53, Irina Nikulina:

Brenthis inoon the inflorescence Veronicastrum sibiricum (likely a subspecies of B. i. Amurensis (Staudinger, 1887)

21.05.2014 22:53, Irina Nikulina:

Brenthis inoon the inflorescence Veronicastrum sibiricum (likely a subspecies of B. i. Amurensis (Staudinger, 1887)

21.05.2014 22:53, Irina Nikulina:

Argynnis ruslana

21.05.2014 22:52, Irina Nikulina:

Argynnis ruslana

21.05.2014 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems no female pics in the gallery by today. This female (will it be) is going to be the first :)

21.05.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.05.2014 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bibasis aquilina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bibasis aquilina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Like checking (Again the same song ...

21.05.2014 18:59, Irina Nikulina:

The first two have not been put in place.

21.05.2014 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes ochracea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes ochracea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thymelicus sylvatica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes ochracea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 17:42, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes ochracea

21.05.2014 17:42, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes ochracea

21.05.2014 17:42, Irina Nikulina:

Thymelicus sylvatica

21.05.2014 17:41, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes ochracea

21.05.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thymelicus sylvatica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thymelicus sylvatica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 17:23, Irina Nikulina:

Thymelicus sylvatica

21.05.2014 17:22, :

Thymelicus sylvatica

21.05.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bibasis aquilina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 17:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bibasis aquilina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 17:07, Irina Nikulina:

Bibasis aquilina

21.05.2014 17:06, Irina Nikulina:

Bibasis aquilina

21.05.2014 17:05, Irina Nikulina:

Bibasis aquiline

21.05.2014 16:47, Irina Nikulina:

Very similar to theNeptis thisbeor related species ... I wish to pupate successful, I'd like to take a look at the butterfly) and more interesting - who eats lime) in addition to the standard diet.

21.05.2014 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, thank you.

21.05.2014 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

21.05.2014 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

21.05.2014 16:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, not very regular pattern.

21.05.2014 16:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tethea or / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

21.05.2014 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tethea or / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

21.05.2014 16:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tethea or / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

21.05.2014 16:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tethea or / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

21.05.2014 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis segetum / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

21.05.2014 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis segetum / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

21.05.2014 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis segetum / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

21.05.2014 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis segetum / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

21.05.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vitaly Gumenuk Basil Sergienko.

21.05.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe spadicearia Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata.

21.05.2014 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe spadicearia / Vitaly Gumenuk Xanthorhoe ferrugata / Basil Sergienko.

21.05.2014 13:14, Basil Sergienko:

This-quadrifasiata

21.05.2014 13:13, Basil Sergienko:

And this (and other) -ferrugata

21.05.2014 12:20, Basil Sergienko:

I would say that this is not ferrugata, and spadicearia

21.05.2014 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea nielseni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.05.2014 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

21.05.2014 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Sterrhinae/Idaea_nielseni.html

21.05.2014 0:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, Peter, about the social network we have not talked, and talked about the new blog. Today evening I'll dial up and discuss how it should look. A gay, at least in the form in which there is now a majority of the city is really not worth it.Personally, I do not perceive organically and run like hell :) Why another and even within the site? They and so full of the network ... Why another site bytovuha and gossip on the benches?

20.05.2014 23:36, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea nielseni

20.05.2014 14:25, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, in general, all right saying I support. A couple of comments:
Store still not built around this site, it is simply connected to it, because I have been involved in both projects. And here is the program for the collection - is yes.
With regards to social networks - also the direction is correct, as I already wrote in the comments Vasily earlier (about the reports on fishing).Only the name is not quite - what you say, it's still not gay: -) In general, the blind end of May, I think.
Regarding the incentives - then why not, but it is only a little more. I talked about that was the person or persons who would be not only the rights and promotion, but also duties. As correctly observed Alexander above.

20.05.2014 13:26, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aroga flavicomella / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

20.05.2014 8:22, Shamil Murtazin:

I, as always, global ideas. =)
This site is always seen as a directory. Well formalized capable in readable form on request to give information about some form. But already it is possible to build infrastructure around.
The store already has. It is planned to catalog and "market" trophies.IMHO should be something like a social network, as if it did not sound scared. There is a need to publish reports on raids, to ask questions of your inventory, how to raise pets, etc.
Perhaps we should start to think about the directory not only butterflies.

With regard to the form in which it is specified.I do not see anything bad that some people will be awarded on the vsemizvestnogo store . The main thing is not to ruin the enthusiasm to working =)
You can kill two birds with giving discounts of 5-10% for a couple of months (or a pair of first order of thousands) for the newly arrived in the ranks of the authors website. And it does not hurt and advertising shop.Evaluation question - he most difficult. Systematics changes all the time, the standard itself is not. IMHO it is necessary to start from the applicability of the taxon: ie need for control is often used. But the details do not understand, the knowledge is not enough :)

The site is wonderful, especially created benevolent atmosphere here;)

20.05.2014 5:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Since the section called "Not about butterflies' :)
I comment on the photo, which is higher.
It depicts the year 05/18/2014 found a rare beetle. Yana "Softwood Ditserka" Dicerca moesta (Fabricius, 1792) . According to some recent discovery type of officially registered in the Moscow region it was made in 1996. My discovery of the truth is not from the Moscow region.And from the neighboring Vladimir, but the distance from the place of occurrence to the boundary of these two regions only some 15 kilometers away.
View listed in the Red Book of Russia as:
"Rare and locally on all its habitat in Russia look. Dweller svezheotmershih conifers. There is a progressive reduction in the number of habitats and species". .Quote taken from the draft of the new edition of Russian spacecraft in 2013.
And a series of regional Red Books.
The very first time I found this bug and then only sporadically. That's so that's lucky on this trip. But the season has just begun .....
I want to wish everyone in this season again and good luck to the new discoveries :)

20.05.2014 2:49, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mesastrape fulguraria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.05.2014 0:32, Irina Nikulina:

Mesastrape fulguraria- very rare in the Russian Far East Moth - Asian-indomalaysky subboreal-tropical forest species.

19.05.2014 23:56, Igor Sakhno:

Yeah, thanks a lot!

19.05.2014 22:32, Peter Khramov:

I remind you that this is a topic for a change (or not change) approach, as such, well, if anyone has any thoughts on the candidates - even for him, too. But for the time being it is not an advertisement for the job; -)

19.05.2014 22:21, Alexander Boldyrev:

Not being a permanent participant of the site, I answer the request of Peter.
As for me, now I can not take part in the development of the project, even more so - for a fee; as in this case assumed certain obligations.
But the whole idea - a good (as with money, and with barter).I hope there will be wishing both among the permanent members and to attract new ones.
Success in the development of the site!

19.05.2014 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I will be a little emotional :)
I have been working on enthusiasm because I just love this thing.
And I earn grandmother in another field: "Working on the basic work."
A website for the soul, and then I did not have the money :)
Attendants will not take me with you, Peter. Do not hurt (
Although ...... barter should think :)

19.05.2014 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Until now, the site operates on the principle "let us not trivialize", ie All participants worked on the enthusiasm. Exception - specialized tasks, but we are not talking about them. It is possible that this principle must continue to work on. Or maybe not. Let's discuss.We have problems that require constant attention, but attention is now loses. This, for example, the addition of information about the species and other taxa, formalization signs to the sample in the catalog worked more than adequately, tight control over the tree taxa and bugs in it. Again, it's all done now.But in much smaller scale than that required on the site of our size. So, you can offer some kind of enough fully trained person (or several people) to address these and / or other problems on a fee basis. To combine, as they say, with pleasure. Perhaps it will come out the site to a new level.But then the question arises ...
But it works for the grandmother, and we are on the enthusiasm! It is unfair, some people think.
And what does "enough fully trained"?
And who do offer such a thing and how to evaluate?
And if this does not debase the idea?
Etc. (by the way, can be supplemented in this topic).
Pay will obviously I am.Some will be easier if you can not do it nalom and barter at the Entomological equipment from sami_znaete_kakogo store. Well, in the case of these payments will rise a question about this here button Donate, I mean help hristaradi so thirsty, already there is no place to spend the night. To at least partially neutralized.Write who thinks that this issue - from ideological thinking, finishing concrete proposals. Lushche on the public, in this topic, but as lichku and can email me.

19.05.2014 17:48, Anna Gerasimova:

like my Jamides caerulea http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25565

19.05.2014 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Congratulations :)
But I'm Vladimir Meshchora explore hard as going: there seemed to find yourself in another world. The people there - expanse: only you and the forest. with its inhabitants. And only a hundred odd kilometers from Moscow :)

19.05.2014 14:13, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Basil, this is my good mood, joking and understand everything (well, you know the same). And you know why ??? Because of Borneo flying these days, la-la-la!

19.05.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.05.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.05.2014 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.05.2014 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.05.2014 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

New, unexpected finding. Apparently I came across an exceptional place.
What else they will bring even dare not guess :)

19.05.2014 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah ... should not have reached, I say :) This is my vehemence destroy me someday for sure.

19.05.2014 8:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

A wise man wrote Vlad Proklov Ostrinia nebulalis complex. it can also bytOstrinia scapulalis, what I then saw. :)

19.05.2014 8:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ancylis selenana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.05.2014 7:53, Anna Gerasimova:

I tried to take pictures of dead butterflies - it's really more difficult! I do better in the mud)))

19.05.2014 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Svetlana, here we are with you differ in opinion. Nets must also be able to swing :) And sometimes have to do to catch a pair of tweezers or stain (this is a jar in which euthanized butterfly). What do you say to that? And then still have more or less correctly and accurately the prepared and photograph the result :)

19.05.2014 5:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleksand, you're right. I admit my mistake. It is better to me when tired in these ognёvok not to go :)

19.05.2014 3:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ostrinia nubilalis / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Ostrinia scapulalis / Tentatively identified / Andrei Frolov.

19.05.2014 2:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.05.2014 2:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

19.05.2014 2:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

19.05.2014 2:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ostrinia nubilalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.05.2014 2:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Loxostege sticticalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

19.05.2014 1:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loxostege sticticalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.05.2014 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.05.2014 0:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.05.2014 0:52, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackii

19.05.2014 0:52, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackii

19.05.2014 0:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I still have to give a link yesterday's collective tour once the three authors of the site: Alexander Boldyrev, Andrey Ponomarev, and your humble servant in Meshchora.
Link to the post of Alexander, and behind him is my right: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526321&view=findpost&p=1485202

Dicerca moesta (Fabricius, 1792)

19.05.2014 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.05.2014 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.05.2014 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.05.2014 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.05.2014 0:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.05.2014 0:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.05.2014 0:10, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackiito escape fodder plant Phellodendron amurense (Rutaceae) - Amur velvet (fam. Rutaceae)

19.05.2014 0:09, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackiion the young shoots of fodder plant Phellodendron amurense (Rutaceae) - Amur velvet (fam. Rutaceae)

19.05.2014 0:09, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackii

19.05.2014 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackii

19.05.2014 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackii

19.05.2014 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio maackii

18.05.2014 22:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Agreed - gallery with habitats and food plants definitely need! Peter did.

18.05.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

18.05.2014 15:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Hemaris affinis on flowers Abelia coreana

18.05.2014 14:59, Yuri Semejkin:

So far as the individual http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28734

18.05.2014 14:56, Yuri Semejkin:

And why has not yet been rescheduled?

18.05.2014 14:55, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

18.05.2014 11:22, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Ha, I understand you! Good frame to make - it's not a net swing :)

18.05.2014 8:18, Anna Gerasimova:

as usual, for a good frame had virtually lie in the mud)))

18.05.2014 5:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Already 830 on the counter :) And now the season ........

18.05.2014 3:41, Peter Khramov:

Did.

18.05.2014 3:34, Peter Khramov:

Vitaly Gumenyuk soon catch up with the pace.

17.05.2014 21:51, Peter Khramov:

Good work.

17.05.2014 21:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chazara heydenreichi / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

17.05.2014 21:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chazara heydenreichi / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

17.05.2014 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Next week I will do.

17.05.2014 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Ok, additionally discuss, and in May, I think everything will be ready.

17.05.2014 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So it is doubly welcome. For example, if you look at reports of Sergei Kotov on molbiole soul rejoices at me personally. I thank him :) And many Awori has very good reports.
The main thing that people podyanulsya: this is to desire. For my part, I guarantee :)

17.05.2014 19:10, Peter Khramov:

So you can do it common to write could not only one person, and not just on one topic. Why no...

17.05.2014 18:25, Igor Ivannikov:

Chazara heydenreichi.

17.05.2014 18:23, Igor Ivannikov:

Chazara heydenreichi.

17.05.2014 18:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, galleries already have to be introduced. And think about the rest of the advanced functionality. Either make changes in "what this site."
And it seems that this is already met somewhere.

17.05.2014 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

17.05.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter simply too frank impact was, well and meet the reaction on my part. I do not like golly "throwing shit" if these should not fly at me from the other side is my feature.
Photo habitats and food plants need.
Especially if the insect monophagy (the same Myrmidon), or simply a rare species.About "my page" I explained in that post, why I posted it ext. photo. And he did so only for species for which deem it necessary to do so based on his personal observations, and they are available in abundance.
Close up gallery, in short if the opportunity is. It really would be better and easier. Greetings.And with hosting these one today and another tomorrow .....

17.05.2014 17:01, Igor Ivannikov:

Labels unfortunately not. I would like to know who it is? :)

17.05.2014 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But that's just old blog will be: until the season. Sometimes so many interesting quote from these visits not only butterflies :) Hunting share, but it is necessary to link to molbiol. It is necessary to discuss and recently zvyaknu. And people, I think some stuff there for that matter :) It would be desirable to hear more opinions on the matter.

17.05.2014 16:25, Peter Khramov:

If there is a desire / opportunity of regular publications, zabatsat is not just another topic on the type molbiolovskih, but something like a blog with the possibility of civilized publications, including and ph. As will be free - just pay me to discuss.

17.05.2014 16:22, Peter Khramov:

On motives of the recent dispute.
If people consider additional foty (which is not actually depicted a butterfly, and their habitats, parasites or something like that) on this site is necessary, they must be loaded into a separate gallery and contact with relevant pictures of butterflies or suitable taxa.Such a system would be much more convenient than posting a photo sharing site on truck in the comments to a photo of a butterfly.
If there is dissent - write in the subject, discuss.
If not - I pochikal foty close up in the comments and additional gallery.
Afterword №1: let's still try to do without bogosrachey and without having to delete such comments.Afterword №2: Promise "on this page is published photo taken by me, and so my page, and I can do it on whatever I want" is incorrect.

17.05.2014 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

His theme do?
Yes, that time has shown that from the 17th of April (when it is thrown cry) I have one here and give links to their research. True Shamil like connected for which he thanks the way it is work, and to be honest I do not know, whether people support: all their problems visible. By the way: the day after tomorrow there is likely another reference from me will appear.Monitors are now very actively those places where I got the reports are mainly. There is already a significant result: the beetle, which is shown in the photo. "Racehorse Forest", by the way on the right and the Red Book of the entire MO It is known only to a couple of tiny points of where it resides.Yes, and for reports required technically to the photo could be shipped directly to the site rather than provide links to third-party hosting services, which today is, and tomorrow is not known what will happen to them. I for the creation of this theme. The main thing that it was not used and it is "the subject of one man."

17.05.2014 3:47, Peter Khramov:

If you would your own reports (not a sheet 33 of the screen), and not just links - would be much more interesting. What do you think, comrades?

17.05.2014 3:42, Peter Khramov:

Done.

17.05.2014 1:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, Peter! If again I will inform you.

16.05.2014 22:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strange things happen .... Even sometimes lose heart, to do something. Some cries nowhere published. And the seriousness of the claim site. To the site was serious and the matter should be approached accordingly ...
Let's hope that everything will be fixed ...

16.05.2014 22:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Here I am about the same - it is everywhere in the species without ph!

16.05.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This copper-butterfly with photo number 29260 looks like all has registered, not only in these lineages.

16.05.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it happens often painful and that Yuri. Therefore he suggested. By the way, you look in the system area Peter recent comments and my Eugene: I think the problem is somehow related.

16.05.2014 19:20, Peter Khramov:

In this concrete case, not the fact that the problem in the user's computer, but the mistake on the site is not found. Yuri, if such a thing happen again - please, try to simultaneously deliver experiments and find out what is wrong.

16.05.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The front wing hook called "Yugum" and rear recess beneath it, the wings are engaged with each other in flight and work synchronously, but it is only at many raznousyh ("nighttime") butterflies. In Rhopalocera (so-called "day") front wing lies "overlap" in the back and it performs the same function: no hooks are not needed here. So I think :)

16.05.2014 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have the same thing in the old scoop Pyrrhia. And I think it's related to the problem that is described in the topic, Yuri Semeykin "poblema loading ph": there he once again copper-butterfly "through the stump-deck" Georgia ..

16.05.2014 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Browser Cache packed to capacity? Or even that the user side is likely. Not a problem site. I always ship it right. And even with the phone on a cellular an Internet and I tried out. Actually from the phone now and write (not at home). Yuri, you need a computer Activities likely. The computer is not iron, which is stuck in the socket and the surface.With him it is necessary to prevent spending from time to time.

16.05.2014 17:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! The above is a glitch with fotami copper-butterfly instead of the missing images in the "other species of the genus" I have pages of all kinds! Maybe this is my personal bug?

16.05.2014 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ctenoceratoda khorgossi Thargelia distincta.

16.05.2014 15:10, Evgeny Komarov:

My view - it Thargelia distincta!

16.05.2014 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

16.05.2014 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

16.05.2014 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhia hedemanni / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.05.2014 11:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Correct the error in the title kind of http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/24378. Not Samagystia Schoorl, 1990 and Semagystia Schoorl, 1990

16.05.2014 11:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Gluck discovered by accident. Here http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/79884 and then to all kinds of kinds of Orthosia, not illustrated photos in "Other Orthosia" is copper-butterfly illustration!

16.05.2014 5:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I attach photo Rakitnika (butterfly host plants). Grows broom in Meshchora among the pines, in the sand.
Picture taken there yesterday-the same place where it was assembled male. This is for the information of where to look for the form. Already That's it, just a few days in central Russia should fly first generation :)

15.05.2014 23:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Not shallow crushes almost everything to cheer. Heavily while only micro.
About the "mechanisms" in the wings for some reason, do not write "to the general" public, although it is very interesting, I think.

15.05.2014 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Greetings from Meshchery :)
05/15/2014 of Vladimir region., Petushki district., Env. The old village Omutischi:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526321&view=findpost&p=1484776

Cicindela (Cicindela) sylvatica Linnaeus, 1758

15.05.2014 8:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'd add that when a butterfly sufficiently softened in the desiccator take insulin syringe and inject it safely in the chest a few drops of warm water and then gently drag her wings to develop muscles. After these operations, crushes material generally no problem.
P.S. Hook it at the lower of butterflies called "Yugum" (lat. Jugum).This is for information only. Good luck :)

15.05.2014 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With the basics that is necessary to begin: http://rghost.ru/55167969

15.05.2014 2:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Upload copper-butterfly. Why did not ship, and did not understand. And just then, removed yesterday prepared boot option and created a new one.

15.05.2014 2:43, Yuri Semejkin:

I tried again today. The first boot, and 2-copper-butterfly yesterday I did not go again.

15.05.2014 2:05, Peter Khramov:

If immediately after loading Gallery ph not, then certainly it's not about that enough. Some glitches. I try again to find out, from what it could be.

15.05.2014 1:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Shamil, I do not understand what kind of archive in question? Download as usual, as always. I too was thinking, it can geography enough shots, but then on the site is necessary for certain types of mark any supply, type; Do not discharge. Enough

14.05.2014 16:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, it was a file?

14.05.2014 13:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Upload file 2 times. He writes that the download pictures of butterflies

Your file has been successfully uploaded to the gallery site. You can always edit the data files you have downloaded to your personal account (section Downloaded images). - But it is not in the gallery, in a private office, too.

14.05.2014 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite rare in MO view. Finding, coordinate the region was confirmed just 2-3 years ago. And here is another godsend .....

13.05.2014 20:29, Shamil Murtazin:

Hello!
Spreads last a long time pressed bear Kaya.
On the front there is a mechanism of the wings of the spring return of the wing: the hook on the wing and body stiff bristles, which is for the hair clings.
Who can tell us about that moment or recommend literature. Thank you.
(photo will ever dry up)

12.05.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2014 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glaucopsyche lycormas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2014 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupido argiades / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2014 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupido argiades / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2014 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina filipjevi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.05.2014 21:40, Irina Nikulina:

Glaucopsyche lycormas

12.05.2014 21:40, Irina Nikulina:

Glaucopsyche lycormas

12.05.2014 21:39, Irina Nikulina:

Glaucopsyche lycormas

12.05.2014 21:39, Irina Nikulina:

Cupido argiades

12.05.2014 21:39, Irina Nikulina:

Cupido argiades

12.05.2014 21:38, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina filipjevi

12.05.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.05.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.05.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.05.2014 8:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sexually sensitive to light :)
Night from 10 to 11 May 2014. MO Orekhovo-Zuyevo district., Pos. Poplar and env., Pos. Vereya (leaving the generator on peat bogs): http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526320&view=findpost&p=1483993

11.05.2014 22:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.05.2014 22:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As it is now revealed. ViewZygaena angelicaeprisutvuet in MO theoretically and finds the form has not yet been confirmed. Conclusion: The "wrong" is female Zygaena filipendulae. Closed finally :)

11.05.2014 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

11.05.2014 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

09.05.2014 15:04, Peter Khramov:

Did. Eugene, future write these comments directly under fotami that all was clear cause and initiator of the transfer ...

09.05.2014 15:03, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by personal image to the author: E. orientalis? Sareptensis.

09.05.2014 15:03, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by personal image to the author: E. orientalis? Sareptensis.

09.05.2014 15:03, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by personal image to the author: E. orientalis? Sareptensis.

09.05.2014 15:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas aurinia Euphydryas orientalis.

09.05.2014 15:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas aurinia Euphydryas orientalis.

09.05.2014 15:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas aurinia Euphydryas orientalis.

09.05.2014 15:01, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by personal image to the author: E. orientalis? Sareptensis.

09.05.2014 15:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Euphydryas aurinia Euphydryas orientalis.

08.05.2014 21:56, Peter Khramov:

Super-! I put in the illustration.

08.05.2014 18:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes! The same applies to images # 22197, # 22196 and # 22195

08.05.2014 18:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! My picture checkered avrinii, but still facing major (Photo # 2644: Euphydryas aurinia), in fact, E. orientalis? Sareptensis (this subspecies is controversial). Transfer the picture! In the Volgograd region orientalis only!

08.05.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.05.2014 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put into accurate. Did adjacent photo.

08.05.2014 17:44, Evgeny Komarov:

If I am not mistaken, this is the first shot of the species in nature, is available in the network.

08.05.2014 2:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, all the same to add the last of those people that call to Alexander about the challenge of my determination, my, the congregation and the butterflies in my points. In my profile on the site is my email address, which is available even if you go to the site "gostёm." You are welcome: write. And we will discuss it, so as not to appear here half a page of comments.I really wonder what kind of a number of signs to hear from the horse's mouth, rather than through a "third party". And believe me, if it were not a sure determination - would put in inaccurate :)

07.05.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to pay attention to the name of the village in the vicinity of which was collected Butterfly: http://wikimapia.org/14413517/ru/Свинская Eloquent is the name :) Not really, right?

07.05.2014 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Somewhere to watch .... More (The pictures ....

07.05.2014 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right enough, Alexander. It was the same joke :) Everything is fine, "the truth is born in dispute" :) really know the point: no one there except filipendulae not: there constantly run hither :)

07.05.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Well, first of all, in my opinion, this butterfly no relation to the Zygaena rubicundus not. It is necessary to watch that is in Turkey, and certainly something there.

07.05.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, nor any war no links :) variant angelicae dropped with white tips. :) Gone discussion of two similar species. And probably already over.

07.05.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eau accurately. Here are some of visyak zygaenidae for example: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26224
Uzhbo hurt it reminds me Zygaena (Mesembrynus) rubicundus (Hübner, [1817]), but alas: punctum like as endemic in Italy, and is listed in the geography of Turkey :)

07.05.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They both volatile :)
http://www.pawsforwildlife.co.uk/six-spot_burnet.php
The war went reference. Alexander, well, right to the same a city I know :)

07.05.2014 17:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is quite changeable
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Zygaena_Angelicae
http://www.naturschutzbuero-zollernalb.de/falter/zygaenidae.htm
http://www.tagschmetterlinge.de/html/tagfalter/widderchen/angelicae_zygaena.htm

07.05.2014 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add that on my picture clearly shows that the fused spots (red refinement viewed just where they are separated from filipendulae) :)

07.05.2014 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that is not white mustache answer :) This is a variation such filipendulae. Can such a deviation from the environmental (city dirty in this context) may even what. A angelicae like here: http://www.wmap.cz/opk/mot/motyl/mot772.htm
It is not like :)

07.05.2014 16:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Unfortunately, both types are specified for the Chechen Republic. butterfly in appearance only, probably not really define.

07.05.2014 16:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Look butterfly (contours) on the link you gave, well, very similar. and more at angelicae white, the very tips of the antennae. Suddenly lucky. Always happens when the bulk of such unique things pop up. :)

07.05.2014 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, if you have a normal unfolding Zygaena filipendulae hocks them one above the other, and see what happens, the width of the wings, the position of the spots among themselves.

07.05.2014 16:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I add: angelicae such as exist in MO theoretically. But if it does not exist here: http://insectamo.ru/hete/87-hete/zygaenidae/789-zygaenidae (blank) means finding is unlikely and that, more than in my home town where I lived all my life :)

07.05.2014 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Collected among ordinary filipendulae, which is a lot in this place, and which had long been collected. And this seemed interesting and well taken. And this one patch of filipendulae pestryanok and even other normal lonicerae there is not clean. It is approx. 500m. from my house :)

07.05.2014 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sericinus montela / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.05.2014 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mdyaya .... "Hat" about Minos I do not think it even though he has repeatedly observed in the suburbs. Be it uncertain there seems to skochaniya Ages (

07.05.2014 16:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sericinus montela / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.05.2014 16:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sericinus montela / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.05.2014 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sericinus montela / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.05.2014 16:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sericinus montela / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.05.2014 16:05, Irina Nikulina:

Sadly (Ure, these harmful bird in the early 2000s in the United States in several states (I think in Virginia and Maryland) all ate euonymus (This is me when my "titmouse" defines several articles came across - a very serious pest ...

07.05.2014 15:52, Irina Nikulina:

Sericinus montela
"Out of the shadows into the light flying, she and shadow and light ...")

07.05.2014 15:52, Irina Nikulina:

Sericinus montelasubspecies S. m. amurensis (Staudinger, 1892)

07.05.2014 15:51, Irina Nikulina:

Sericinus montela

07.05.2014 15:50, Irina Nikulina:

CaterpillarSericinus montelaage on the last piece of food plant - Aristolochia contorta (kirkazon twisted or Prirechny)

07.05.2014 15:50, Irina Nikulina:

Sericinus montela

07.05.2014 15:32, Alex Dumchus:

I gave photo because it is found in Mexico, this subspecies without tails

07.05.2014 15:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Zygaena minos/purpuralis

07.05.2014 15:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, and who is identified as the butterfly? I call and say it's not Zygaena filipendulae, and most likely Zygaena angelicae. For a variety of symptoms. :) I do not know how you do with this.

07.05.2014 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena purpuralislikely. Lyudiii ... do you agree? :)

07.05.2014 10:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Shot on Euonymus maximowicziana

07.05.2014 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.05.2014 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.05.2014 9:23, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

06.05.2014 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, yes, you're right. At I just polednee tuplyu time. Mouse only needlessly wear out :)

06.05.2014 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes subhyalina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrgus speyeri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes venatus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 22:54, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes subhyalina

06.05.2014 22:40, Irina Nikulina:

Pyrgus speyeri

06.05.2014 22:40, Irina Nikulina:

Ochlodes venatus

06.05.2014 21:29, Peter Khramov:

Your browser - at the line where juzverej enters the address of the site. Otkryavat extra box is not necessary. Just hover on the link and URL will appear in the status bar (or the pop-up status bar) at the bottom left.

06.05.2014 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes venatus / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate until it was time to deal with it last.

06.05.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not remember where I was almost five years ago took faunis :)

06.05.2014 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erynnis montanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erynnis montanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erynnis montanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 20:06, Irina Nikulina:

Most likely, I think it is a femaleOchlodes venatusAccording Korshunov, in Primorye subspecies Ochlodes venatus amurensis Mabille, 1909 (= selas Kurentzov, 1970), ie, here already expressed similar assumptions.

06.05.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius nomion / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius nomion / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius nomion / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 19:12, Irina Nikulina:

Erynnis montanus

06.05.2014 19:12, Irina Nikulina:

Erynnis montanus

06.05.2014 19:12, Irina Nikulina:

Erynnis montanus

06.05.2014 18:40, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius nomionprobably a subspecies of P. n. mandschuriae Oberthür, 1891

06.05.2014 18:40, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius nomion

06.05.2014 18:39, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius nomionprobably a subspecies of P. n. mandschuriae Oberthür, 1891

06.05.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.05.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.05.2014 17:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uploaded exclusively for points. More out Swallowtail ship will not: they and so many here :)

06.05.2014 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina phellodendroni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 17:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Celastrina phellodendroni identified the IRA Nikulin

06.05.2014 17:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Celastrina phellodendroni identified the IRA Nikulin

06.05.2014 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Male.

06.05.2014 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.05.2014 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ova Male.

06.05.2014 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.05.2014 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

06.05.2014 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.05.2014 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Geography-like. Doubtful some. It seems to me this is not croceus.

06.05.2014 14:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Anything but croceus. I added croceus underside just to see. Should be checked more. Anyone knows maybe?

06.05.2014 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's just underside "tied" to the previously loaded butterflies.

06.05.2014 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This photo is taken marking 800 :)

06.05.2014 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Arctornis sp. The thing in my joints.

06.05.2014 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paramaxates spinivesica / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.05.2014 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The discussion did not go (and I do not see any options.

06.05.2014 8:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, I do not care where the spread. If you have a priority - please, I will not duplicate.
This photo after determining gets anyway :)

06.05.2014 8:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thymelicus sylvatica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also I think it chno T. sylvatica despite unnecessary in the photo "thingies" :)

06.05.2014 8:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 2:47, Irina Nikulina:

SametsOchlodes sylvanus

06.05.2014 2:36, Irina Nikulina:

Thymelicus sylvatica, I think

06.05.2014 0:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syngrapha ain / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 0:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yet it is: http://www.lepinet.fr/especes/nation/lep/?e=l&id=45960 (in the region there are 37).

06.05.2014 0:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa gamma / Confidently identified / Vladimir Bobow Not identified.

06.05.2014 0:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia maculosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 0:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Base: http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=1314

06.05.2014 0:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

06.05.2014 0:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is likely that the same butterfly, as (date and same geography): http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/29056 It is necessary to link to the group.

06.05.2014 0:14, Irina Nikulina:

Cucullia maculosa

06.05.2014 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Limenitis moltrechti / Igor Ivannikov Limenitis amphyssa / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Limenitis moltrechti / Igor Ivannikov Limenitis amphyssa / Irina Nikulina.

06.05.2014 0:08, Irina Nikulina:

ThisLimenitis amphyssa

06.05.2014 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

Igor, I can not agree. In moltrechti in the central cell of the PC is only one elongated white spot in the middle (especially on the underside is clearly visible). ThisLimenitis amphyssa

05.05.2014 23:48, Irina Nikulina:

Syngrapha ain, is likely

05.05.2014 23:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil me here, too, can be determined on mobiole certainly people more :)

05.05.2014 21:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander Zhakov - assumption Acleris schalleriana

05.05.2014 21:12, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander Zhakov - assumption Acleris schalleriana

05.05.2014 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nepoluchaetsya with etog Yandex larger than normal Kartika paste, sorry.

05.05.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yandex pictures some rubbish began recently. We must look for another hosting. Nepoymi any link issues.
 pic_4.jpg

05.05.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I like this room look shorter (underlined). In the settings Opera this is called "address bar" (my version of the "Address Bar"):

05.05.2014 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.05.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why is inaccurate? It pulls on it :) But, more to the South-West region of Kirov. I think the selection is small.

05.05.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.05.2014 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.05.2014 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.05.2014 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.05.2014 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only fly males because females Perelivnits almost down to the ground from the trees. This same feature and Lentochnikov :)

05.05.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

05.05.2014 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reason for correction of geography: "43 km." does not actually station , and platform Gorky direction MOR. This is such a well-approx. as the difference between the village and the village :)

05.05.2014 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

05.05.2014 1:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well I know this area (my region) so he took the liberty to tweak a little geographic data :)

05.05.2014 1:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

04.05.2014 22:34, Shamil Murtazin:

By the way, black-eyed individual and did not find ...

04.05.2014 15:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Caterpillar on leaf Asarum sieboldii

04.05.2014 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To do everything in my power :)

04.05.2014 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

04.05.2014 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK

04.05.2014 13:03, Andrey Ponomarev:

By location written Vjatka

04.05.2014 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dyseriocrania subpurpurella / Sergey Talanov Eriocrania sparrmannella / Andrey Ponomarev.

04.05.2014 12:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mikhail Kozlov is not listed in the authors. Because put determined the Andrew. With a mark which must be geography image that is missing.

04.05.2014 12:32, Andrey Ponomarev:

It Eriocrania sparrmannella, definition Mikhail Kozlov on macroid.ru
Dyseriocrania subpurpurella looks different

04.05.2014 4:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Third generation. The butterfly has three generation. It is necessary to do the addition of information at your leisure.

04.05.2014 4:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I messed up. This third generation, sorry.

04.05.2014 4:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation

04.05.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation

03.05.2014 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.05.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.05.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.05.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.05.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.05.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.05.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.05.2014 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Igor, do not put any punctuation marks at startup. It was written from the point of Stichophtalma howqua . Because of this, it is meant to be stuck :)

03.05.2014 10:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.05.2014 10:08, Yuri Semejkin:

And this that makes inaccurate? You can send and accurate.

03.05.2014 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Endropiodes indictinaria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.05.2014 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

03.05.2014 9:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Endropiodes indictinaria Bremer, 1864

03.05.2014 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.05.2014 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.05.2014 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation

03.05.2014 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.05.2014 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second generation

03.05.2014 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.05.2014 7:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just went to the fashion of the frame. Why is it necessary to surezno site? Unclear...
Lord, here frame completely useless in my opinion. There should be two options: a photo in nature and photo collector material. And without anything extra. This is the same site about butterflies and not figuratively "souvenir shop" :)

03.05.2014 3:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.05.2014 3:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

03.05.2014 2:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Nymphalis vaualbum

03.05.2014 2:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Nymphalis vaualbum

02.05.2014 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Meshchora today: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526321&view=findpost&p=1482561

02.05.2014 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only in those places and I see this wonder sometimes :)

02.05.2014 2:50, Igor Sakhno:

No, I'm all windows inserts one number, which is to combine all the pictures, but two photos caterpillars, once linked together in one group, for some reason this does not apply, and they remain separate from the hatched from it a butterfly, and along with the dolls.

02.05.2014 1:53, Peter Khramov:

Oh, yeah. I mean not the address bar, and status bar. With address - at Basil's prescription is necessary.

02.05.2014 0:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Vasily, I dopetril :) only your browser called - Web address

02.05.2014 0:50, Peter Khramov:

If you want to quickly see the number of photos of the author, it is not necessary to go anywhere. Suggests a link with the name of the author, which have each foty, and in the address bar the last number - floor is a room.
You can instead of numbers to make a list of authors from which you can choose, but the list would be very large. I think it is more convenient numbers. Right?

01.05.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I came :) There is really a problem. It is one thing: plain juzverej. A more advanced hacker. Here it is necessary to solve the problem, if it exists, of course :) The more Tor browser now works at 100. It's even strange somehow. I can offer assistance in solving problems. Sorry, this is not in the spirit of a few .....

01.05.2014 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander was responsible for Peter. You've got to go to the page of the author, and watch your browser: where the latter figure is precisely the number of the author. It's simple: this is his and it is necessary to drive when moving :)

01.05.2014 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Vasiem not Printsepialno, but if there is a possibility that it is desirable to specify the time or at least to date, but it is possible.
Peter, I mean when uploaded photos without defining any public comments, and the author does not.I went to stranytsu author, and there is also no room, so you had to go all the authors seek to press on comments then flashed his comments, was a member of one of them and only saw a number of the author. Now I looked and found closer :) author page number visible in the Web address. :)

01.05.2014 17:07, Peter Khramov:

With one of the two browser akkov work impossible. IP has nothing to do with it. When there is the ability to bind to it, this means that one can not come in from the ACC another IP-address, and not that of a single IP can not operate two different users in two different akkah.

01.05.2014 5:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For Irina. Sorry I could not see right away. On the site if I am not mistaken is not binding on the Ip address and you can work with one browser in two LC opened simultaneously. This is to save time and not constantly jumping from one to the other LK

01.05.2014 5:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I checked the matter: there was a photo I specifically waited more than an hour, and it moved the first time and no longer flies. Here we must simply wait. You're right. And the best time of publication Bring if possible: useful and maybe not only for the transfer.

01.05.2014 3:07, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, with regards to the numbers of authors - essno do not need to go to any page number of the author (if you're using your account) you displayed next to the author's comments in parentheses.
Regarding the loading time - I can do just to lock the transfer of species within an hour after the download, but I think it is not necessary to do so. SinceWe here not as the authors of a hundred people, but only a few, I think, you just need to come from the reasonable - see Fautua in the past, do not rush right into the breach, and if the site was like and it still hangs, then the transfer. Or do you need to display the time of publication? Question and Alexander, and Basil, of course.

01.05.2014 3:03, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, on the admin's answer the question now in the system area (edit your comments, in part, is not related to a public debate).

01.05.2014 2:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, and yet not be seen where and when the photo is loaded ...

01.05.2014 2:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determination on lepiforum.de Egbert Friedrich

01.05.2014 2:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determination on lepiforum.de Egbert Friedrich

01.05.2014 2:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemonia balcanica / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

01.05.2014 2:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lemonia balcanica / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

01.05.2014 2:26, Peter Khramov:

I did just now. Sorry for braking, lousy Now with time and silёnkami.

01.05.2014 2:23, Peter Khramov:

It's a pity not to sharpen his grandmother. Very interesting picture might be.

01.05.2014 2:22, Peter Khramov:

For the sake of the experiment are asked to carry moderators foty no earlier than an hour after their users to download. We must somehow check this thing ...

01.05.2014 2:17, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, please ship foty possible without frames and ghosting.

01.05.2014 2:16, Peter Khramov:

And in what appears "does not go"? We enter data, update, and it does not remain or can not make the data in the right amount at the window?

01.05.2014 2:15, Peter Khramov:

If you're talking about Russia, then as always http://lurkmore.to/%D0%92%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BC_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%85%D1%83%D0 % B9 and if you're talking about the EU or the US, it was interesting to learn how they have the laws in this area, by the way. Judging by the much more developed thematic soobschetstvam - did little Lucci.

30.04.2014 11:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.04.2014 8:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macdunnoughia confusa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.04.2014 0:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why can not catch anywhere?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qEW47k_IcHQ

30.04.2014 0:08, Igor Sakhno:

IV instar (on the head "horns").

29.04.2014 23:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

29.04.2014 22:54, Igor Sakhno:

I wanted to make a large group, but does not go to sit down here two more rooms - 23258 and 23336

29.04.2014 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antigius butleri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 18:47, Irina Nikulina:

Antigius butleri

29.04.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Males. Females have wider sling and on the ground they do not sit ever.

29.04.2014 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.04.2014 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.04.2014 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, like it myself intelligible plained. Just I was not at home. So I wrote :)

29.04.2014 17:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

29.04.2014 17:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis amphyssa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 17:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis camilla / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis populi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) Please, just do not care, did not understand the message :)

29.04.2014 17:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Got. That's where it was discussed: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28769
And indeed if everything is normal wait time is transferred (checked). Although dark matter :)

29.04.2014 17:18, Alexander Kuzmin: This species is identified correctly.

29.04.2014 17:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, Alexander, I am seeing me work done. Thank you :)

29.04.2014 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe global (also think about it). Just was discussed already. Just today is the same thing night corrected and out of the other lux. Well, I think at perhlest banal. Site engine here in my poor ..... Uncomfortable writing: it is necessary to first get home :)

29.04.2014 15:18, Irina Nikulina:

It is unlikely that this is the reason. Many put me photos of LK Vladimir flew, although I have not been edited in the LC. Moreover, because I'm out of it after setting the LC and sometimes edit and turn in your LC and write the definition - and only carries a moderator. Coincidence "redaktsiya- transfer" may have been the only one, and not just a glitch occurred.Peter talked about this.

29.04.2014 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, we will wait :)

29.04.2014 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter wrote why. The author gives an hour for editing and if the butterfly, which he edited in lux, while some action performs moderator glitch occurs. In short: it is better to wait an hour or so :)

29.04.2014 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, what's the catch? :) How much time must pass? And why wait? and only depends on the time? to? Some definitions are other flies may be another reason?

29.04.2014 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea straminata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

29.04.2014 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis philyra / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.04.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Neptis philyra / Yuri Semejkin Neptis philyroides / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.04.2014 14:40, Irina Nikulina:

I would rather agree with Dmitry here .. 2-3 small white spots - «small spots on costa before the cell» there (it really works sign) + white bar per cent. PC cell at philyra usually much narrower. Therefore, it seems to me, here -Neptis philyroides

29.04.2014 14:27, Irina Nikulina:

Neptis philyra

29.04.2014 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then let hung yet. I'll come home and check (now in the forest). East, and especially long-range-a delicate matter :)

29.04.2014 13:51, Basil Sergienko:

Idaea straminata (Catalog Viidaleppa ssp.karafutonis), if there is still something similar there, on the European side has a similar deversaria, but there is none

29.04.2014 13:33, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis amphyssa

29.04.2014 13:32, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis camillasubspecies L. c. japonica Ménétriés, 1857

29.04.2014 13:31, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis populisubspecies L. p. ussuriensis Staudinger, 1887

29.04.2014 12:03, Irina Nikulina:

It is very likely that theEctephrina semilutata

29.04.2014 11:40, Irina Nikulina:

Rather, it isMacaria alternata

29.04.2014 11:28, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Handsome!

29.04.2014 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula nigropunctata? And Sinev falls.

29.04.2014 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Look what mustache :)

29.04.2014 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Strongly doubt. Let neoprene. pobudet.

29.04.2014 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

29.04.2014 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

29.04.2014 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

29.04.2014 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.04.2014 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

29.04.2014 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MOVED based on the author's comments. Peter, there must also be cleaned in the "Update classification"

29.04.2014 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanitis leda / Confidently identified / Roger Dolorosa.

29.04.2014 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

29.04.2014 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander Braves, please interval between loading and transfer order was not necessary to carry Then again :) The very often these rakes came.

29.04.2014 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drepana curvatula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 7:15, Vladimir Bobow:

Irina, I'm in these subtleties do not understand. I defined so roughly, so I put in inaccurate, what experts in the field and then corrected.

29.04.2014 4:17, Yuri Semejkin:

I believe that it is possible to transfer into accurate. Yes, it is somewhat different from the others. Samples presented here. But in this case it is normal. The extent of inundation on the yellow background wings purplish-red the bond varies in different individuals. This is evident even in the pictures shown here. Of the 13 species of Idaea only Idaea muricata fit the description.[On DV represented by a subspecies minot Stem]

29.04.2014 3:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 3:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 3:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Again, those same "rake" signed corrected.
Do not gud (((
It is necessary that this be done.

29.04.2014 3:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 3:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 3:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 3:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 2:28, Irina Nikulina:

Vladimir, I would have looked in detail your loved DV-kindAbraxas niphonibia, there are some differences from sylvata, very characteristic ring of yellow-brown stain on the inside of a big gray VC.

29.04.2014 1:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drepana curvatula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 0:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 0:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 0:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 0:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.04.2014 0:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 0:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 0:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 0:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 0:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 0:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia gracilis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

29.04.2014 0:03, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius stubbendorfiifeeds on flowers yasentsa mohnatoplodnogo (Dictamnus dasycarpus Turcz.)

29.04.2014 0:02, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius stubbendorfii

29.04.2014 0:02, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius stubbendorfii

29.04.2014 0:01, Irina Nikulina:

Parnassius stubbendorfii

28.04.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Today vylyzka: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526321&view=findpost&p=1482045

28.04.2014 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fully them there. Probably the most green underside of all the cabbage in her :)

28.04.2014 19:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Wow what Zelenka)

28.04.2014 16:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Actias artemis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 16:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometra papilionaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometra papilionaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 16:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma lutea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 16:45, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

28.04.2014 16:38, Irina Nikulina:

Actias artemis

28.04.2014 16:37, Irina Nikulina:

Geometra papilionaria

28.04.2014 16:37, Irina Nikulina:

Geometra papilionaria

28.04.2014 16:36, Irina Nikulina:

Spilosoma lutea

28.04.2014 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia balsamitae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.04.2014 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.04.2014 14:48, Irina Nikulina:

# 28936 mean)

28.04.2014 14:47, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps tooBiston betularia? Sasha, guess careful never found two types of ET-- hypoleucus and thoracicaria, maybe someone knows? # 28938 also from Biston

28.04.2014 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Biston betularia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Biston betularia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycia hirtaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 14:33, Irina Nikulina:

And this is very similar to theBiston betularia

28.04.2014 14:32, Irina Nikulina:

Biston betularialikely

28.04.2014 14:02, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps one of the DV-subspeciesLycia hirtaria? (For example, L. h. Parallelaria Inoue, 1958)

28.04.2014 12:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

28.04.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura schrenckii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura schrenckii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura schrenckii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 12:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apatura schrenckii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 12:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ennomos autumnaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 12:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jankowskia pseudathleta / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 12:00, Irina Nikulina:

It is male. Color other females, browner, the central spot in a sling more creamy than white and orange spots on the lower part of her larger and reach the bottom. BK edge. Today, put a photo of the female (photo Vl.Mescheryakova) http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28948, can be compared. And here in the comparison clearly visible differences http://omop.su/images/65/Apatura_%28Amuriana%29_schrenckii.jpg and http://rusinsects.com/nymph/nm-schr.htm

28.04.2014 11:57, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura schrenckii

28.04.2014 11:57, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura schrenckii

28.04.2014 11:56, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura schrenckii

28.04.2014 11:45, Irina Nikulina:

Apatura schrenckii

28.04.2014 11:35, Irina Nikulina:

Ennomos autumnaria

28.04.2014 11:34, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, I think. which can be imprecise until later have to dig deeper)

28.04.2014 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

I have not looked in inaccurate possible?

28.04.2014 10:58, Irina Nikulina:

Jankowskia pseudathleta? There are doubts between this view andJankowskia athleta

28.04.2014 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cnaemidophorus rhododactyla / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.04.2014 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

W instead of V are often placed in American writing. If I am not mistaken. They are from England is somewhat different from the classical :)

28.04.2014 8:10, Vladimir Bobow:

Yes, Shamil, you're right. Should the names be at the end of the Latin letter V, but when I was working on Sakhalin, a foreign project, my name beydzhiki written in English because it is apparently a mistake, and then I just did not change the spelling, so left. Yes, I think it is not so important.

28.04.2014 7:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Why Beans = Bobow?
It seemed to me in Russian = V Latin

28.04.2014 3:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 2:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena phlaeas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 2:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 2:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyaniris semiargus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.04.2014 2:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris kurentzovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.04.2014 23:44, Irina Nikulina:

Phengaris kurentzovi

27.04.2014 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Cyaniris semiargus(possibly subspecies C. s. Amurensis (Tutt, 1909))

27.04.2014 23:43, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena dispar(subspecies L. d. Aurata Leech, 1887)

27.04.2014 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena phlaeas(possibly subspecies L. p. Chinensis (Felder, 1862))

27.04.2014 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena phlaeas(possibly subspecies L. p. Chinensis (Felder, 1862))

27.04.2014 0:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mimas tiliae Smerinthus ocellata.

27.04.2014 0:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Andrey Lutikov Sergei Kotov.

27.04.2014 0:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ussuriana michaelis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.04.2014 0:31, Igor Sakhno:

The color and brilliance of certain mottled.

27.04.2014 0:01, Irina Nikulina:

Ussuriana michaelis

26.04.2014 23:53, Irina Nikulina:

Indeed, little at all, read about it), I think - only yours, en not- and in Russia meets, even in our region 8, but never seen such ... Actually some strange spread her for RF-13 east Reg. only 37 found) Somewhere only one given coarse - stevia Konoplev, but somewhere and plants of the genus Brassica - they really have something everywhere ..

26.04.2014 23:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Wagimo signata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 22:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atara arata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 22:48, Irina Nikulina:

Wagimo signata

26.04.2014 22:48, Irina Nikulina:

Atara arata

26.04.2014 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis leucographa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis leucographa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis leucographa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis leucographa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis leucographa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis leucographa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 22:44, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2014 22:43, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2014 22:43, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2014 22:43, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2014 22:42, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2014 22:42, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2014 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

1914-04-00 00:00:00 2014-04-00 00:00:00.

26.04.2014 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

1914-04-00 00:00:00 2014-04-00 00:00:00.

26.04.2014 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

1914-04-00 00:00:00 2014-04-00 00:00:00.

26.04.2014 22:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atrophaneura alcinous / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 22:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis amphyssa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis amphyssa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.04.2014 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Mescheryakov Papilio machaon / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 22:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Mescheryakov Papilio machaon / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 22:31, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis amphyssa

26.04.2014 22:31, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis amphyssa

26.04.2014 22:30, Irina Nikulina:

Atrophaneura alcinous

26.04.2014 22:29, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio machaon, subspecies P. m. ussuriensis Sheljuzhko, 1910. It is considered the largest of the subspecies that live on the territory of the Russian Federation.

26.04.2014 22:29, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio machaon, subspecies P. m. ussuriensis Sheljuzhko, 1910. It is considered the largest of the subspecies that live on the territory of the Russian Federation.

26.04.2014 22:28, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Reserves # 28814. Also very troubling year shooting :)

26.04.2014 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / 2007-05-23 00:00:00 Elachista maculicerusella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov / 0000-00-00 00:00:00.

26.04.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, and I just started this book in the distant 1970s.
Until now I have it stored tattered read out "to the holes" as a memory. Beach :)
A good book, literate, and many started with her ....
Therefore everything and I propose to start. Both the many recommendations from her remember for a lifetime and still they should :)

26.04.2014 20:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, yes, of course the book repeatedly downloaded and read. The catch arise from the fact that literature and various debates is, for those who do not understand anything ("beginners"), and between those who have long ("experts"). But like I was in the middle. Answers for beginners - very few answers of experts - many (something I do not understand a).Then while we try and substantive issues have then to ask :)
Peter, hence unlikely to migrate. Especially to your site came from molbiola :)
Offer still attach to the gallery community. For young photographers to attach to lepidopterofotografirovaniyu :)

26.04.2014 16:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, no, not really :) migration consultation on this matter can only get there. How to correctly assemble, the prepared, etc. etc. I can give here, but the way of cooking ......, alas (
Question Shamil.Shamil you book Kozlov and Nienburg "Your Collection", which I laid out for you once downloaded?
Although she is old, but there is a lot for a beginner the necessary information that is always relevant :)

26.04.2014 15:42, Peter Khramov:

... So I began the migration to molbiolu ...

26.04.2014 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only here hardly, if a lot of people know at all, what is "cooking" where photographers in the ground and we have very few left, it is a fact. And once again molbiol entomological forum and better in Russia. He is the first and only. I do not do this, alas. And then, I would be prompted :)

26.04.2014 14:34, Shamil Murtazin:

This site is closer to me :)
There is something highly specialized and very much seriously. I'm a gallop across Europe ...

26.04.2014 14:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Luehdorfia puziloi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Luehdorfia puziloi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elcysma westwoodii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elcysma westwoodii Illiberis consimilis.

26.04.2014 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia fugax / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Belciades niveola / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kirinia epaminondas / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.04.2014 14:06, Irina Nikulina:

Belciades niveola

26.04.2014 14:06, Irina Nikulina:

Kirinia epaminondas

26.04.2014 13:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrew, there are two definitions of the author, preferring Photo :)

26.04.2014 13:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis rubricosa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis rubricosa / Confidently identified / .

26.04.2014 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis rubricosa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis rubricosa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerastis rubricosa / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

26.04.2014 13:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Already dealt previously with other file. This too should be moved to Illiberis consimilis

26.04.2014 13:01, Irina Nikulina:

Elcysma westwoodii

26.04.2014 13:00, Irina Nikulina:

Rhodinia fugax

26.04.2014 12:58, Irina Nikulina:

Do not dare writeEuproctis similis, because More 3-LW types Euproctis safe to exclude only subflava. Euproctis riperita (Pts. Similar tracks) and Euproctis (Pida) niphonis (not found images of caterpillars) are questionable. Maybe someone knows these 2 types?

26.04.2014 12:58, Irina Nikulina:

Luehdorfia puziloi

26.04.2014 12:57, Irina Nikulina:

Luehdorfia puziloi

26.04.2014 12:49, Irina Nikulina:

Already ?? What early "bird"))!

26.04.2014 9:12, Zoran Bozovic:

Aroga flavicomella *

26.04.2014 9:00, Zoran Bozovic:

Erannis defoliaria *

26.04.2014 8:59, Zoran Bozovic:

Amphipyra berbera *

26.04.2014 8:57, Zoran Bozovic:

Amata phegea *

26.04.2014 8:54, Zoran Bozovic:

Amata phegea *

26.04.2014 8:54, Zoran Bozovic: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2014 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And here, too. This system is already. And with that something must be done. Two butterflies happened then. Laugh laugh, but this is not correct .....

26.04.2014 1:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is truth too. From now on, I'm not in a hurry. "Oh, no, no need to hurry, no need to hurry ..." as he said so on. CAAX :)

26.04.2014 1:04, Peter Khramov:

User has to change hour (binding to the form or otvyazku from him). Kuda process here? A modernization should be taken into account rather that juzverej hour changes. And if he does not give an hour - at all wrong. Not to mention the fact that when downloading files, and even impossible.

25.04.2014 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not do such things. In fact, I "zhuchist" anymore. Ask this question better in the topic. The more you are registered :) molbiole

25.04.2014 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It seems that I honestly think so. Probably no need to hurry with the transfer, and the author should enter data directly and without delay "for later." It should be borne in mind that at this time on the site may be modernization, which will transfer immediately. But in fact it is a defect of the engine in my opinion. If such "an overlap" is possible.

25.04.2014 21:16, Peter Khramov:

Well, that is similar to the same.

25.04.2014 21:15, Peter Khramov:

Beauty.

25.04.2014 21:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa cardui / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.04.2014 21:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.04.2014 21:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia burejana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.04.2014 21:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-aureum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.04.2014 21:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis canace / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.04.2014 21:13, Peter Khramov:

The only reason that comes to mind: the author foty edit your pictures in the gallery (recently uploaded) until it does, modernization moves, and after that the photographer presses the "Update" in his editing, because Fota out again undetermined (bo in his editing still left blank). Seems legit?

25.04.2014 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved first comment remains, but after a while fall and fall again zhmakat.
At first tolerated, then the top line goes where it was written "Photo # 28769: Papilio xuthus " and it remains " Photo # 28769:" Kind of undefined " already after postponed and we have to repeat the transfer (this is an example the case with this particular photo). Understand.

25.04.2014 19:29, Irina Nikulina:

Nymphalis canace

25.04.2014 19:28, Irina Nikulina:

Polygonia c-aureum

25.04.2014 19:28, Irina Nikulina:

Araschnia burejana

25.04.2014 19:27, Irina Nikulina:

Araschnia levana

25.04.2014 19:27, Irina Nikulina:

Vanessa cardui

25.04.2014 18:33, Peter Khramov:

Well, it is transferred, and then falls back or not transferred at all, although the comments put?

25.04.2014 17:57, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2014 17:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2014 17:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2014 17:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2014 17:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2014 16:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil can something dissection of the genitalia of this group of flat moles say? ..
It is clear that we must try. But you never know. It may succeed on the first try :)
(optimist mode off.)

25.04.2014 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

25.04.2014 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

25.04.2014 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Ilia Ustiantcev.

25.04.2014 10:37, Andrey Ponomarev:

Determination of Ilya Ustyantsev

25.04.2014 10:29, Andrey Ponomarev:

In my opinion it Cerastis rubricosa

25.04.2014 7:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, well then here Wellcome to start: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=154242

24.04.2014 19:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, thanks for the comment. No doubt the complexity of the group, but now everything was clear.
Apparently, it is necessary to study and try to dissect the genitals)

24.04.2014 19:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Dmitry, when writing commentary see above entry field: there are buttons Subtitle , in bold , italics , < em> The picture from another site .
That extreme button - The picture from another site we need. In the window that appears necessary to enter a link to a third-party site (I use Yandex).And we must not forget about the appropriate resolution picture that it was not too big, 500-600 pixels on the long side.

24.04.2014 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglia tau / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 17:26, Irina Nikulina:

Aglia tau

24.04.2014 17:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglia tau / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 17:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa indica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 17:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Artopoetes pryeri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Artopoetes pryeri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Artopoetes pryeri / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Aglia tau / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 17:04, Irina Nikulina:

Artopoetes pryeri

24.04.2014 17:04, Irina Nikulina:

Artopoetes pryeri

24.04.2014 17:04, Irina Nikulina:

Artopoetes pryeri

24.04.2014 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa indica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 17:03, Irina Nikulina:

Aglia tau

24.04.2014 17:03, Irina Nikulina:

Vanessa indica

24.04.2014 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sephisa princeps / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 13:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sephisa princeps / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 13:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 13:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis vaualbum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 13:50, Irina Nikulina:

Sephisa princeps

24.04.2014 13:49, Irina Nikulina:

Nymphalis vaualbum

24.04.2014 13:49, Irina Nikulina:

Nymphalis vaualbum

24.04.2014 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Depressaria radiella / Tentatively identified / Shamil Murtazin Not identified.

24.04.2014 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now came the answer from Vlad Proklova of the butterfly, "a group of muddy and to establish the truth you only need to cook." Based on this I apologize again for the fact that haste yesterday and sent back to undefined.

24.04.2014 11:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And as the photos in the forum thread insert?

24.04.2014 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paradarisa consonaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.04.2014 10:49, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

24.04.2014 10:26, Irina Nikulina:

Night Visitors) I thinkParadarisa consonaria

24.04.2014 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, very muddy group of photos with her hard work, butterflies are very varied in color, it is not visible on the photo size is not known habitat and forage plant. 17 vskidku region has a number of species is very similar Depressaria hofmanni, Depressaria ultimella and a number of species that yast you, but I do not know and do not videl.idut from Asia.Therefore, to determine the species of the South Urals CET photographs simply not serious. So I could not stand this photo. Basil looks easier.

23.04.2014 20:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, comment please. Type of genital happens? ..

23.04.2014 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let then is inaccurate pobudet :)

23.04.2014 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

23.04.2014 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, then the accuracy of no more than 30%, well already kind of talked and talked about it, where can I bear, so I beg you.

23.04.2014 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria radiella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

23.04.2014 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, but not special in the micro (I agree. For me, too, so it: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Depressaria_Radiella
I bear :)

23.04.2014 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, urgently needs to treat this glitch when the picture there seems to be tolerated, but it remains in uncertainty. A few days ago, and I have the same situation was, and had to endure again. It does not want to "pollute" unnecessary comments about the transfer pages of photos.

23.04.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio xuthus.

23.04.2014 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio xuthus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 17:55, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio xuthus

23.04.2014 17:55, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio xuthus

23.04.2014 17:54, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio xuthus

23.04.2014 17:54, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio xuthus

23.04.2014 17:54, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio xuthus

23.04.2014 17:54, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio xuthus

23.04.2014 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Elachista argentella / Confidently identified / Masha Gill.

23.04.2014 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia wanga / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe marginalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lethe marginalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 13:47, Irina Nikulina:

Erebia wanga

23.04.2014 13:28, Irina Nikulina:

Lethe marginalis

23.04.2014 13:28, Irina Nikulina:

Lethe marginalis

23.04.2014 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

What a pleasant sovochkom :)

23.04.2014 7:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Depressaria radiella?

23.04.2014 0:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satarupa nymphalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 0:23, Irina Nikulina:

Satarupa nymphalis

23.04.2014 0:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia epimede / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 0:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia epimede / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 0:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lopinga achine.

23.04.2014 0:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.04.2014 0:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria leucocephala / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.04.2014 0:02, Irina Nikulina:

Lopinga achine

22.04.2014 23:59, Irina Nikulina:

Melanargia epimede

22.04.2014 23:58, Irina Nikulina:

Melanargia epimede

22.04.2014 23:58, Irina Nikulina:

Lopinge achine

22.04.2014 23:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria depressana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.04.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then I was not the moderator, and wrote in the comments. And now the time has come, and when he moved :)

22.04.2014 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Vlad Proklov.

22.04.2014 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vlad Proklov.

22.04.2014 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris arionides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris arionides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris arionides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 17:26, Irina Nikulina:

Phengaris arionides

22.04.2014 17:25, Irina Nikulina:

Phengaris arionides

22.04.2014 17:24, Irina Nikulina:

Phengaris arionides

22.04.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ussuriana michaelis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Shirozua jonasi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 14:01, Irina Nikulina:

Ussuriana michaelis

22.04.2014 14:00, Irina Nikulina:

Shirozua jonasi

22.04.2014 13:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Laothoe amurensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 13:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Laothoe amurensis (Staudinger, 1892)

22.04.2014 13:41, Irina Nikulina:

Laothoe amurensis

22.04.2014 11:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleonymia opposita / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.04.2014 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callambulyx tatarinovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotia maculana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.04.2014 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha asperella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

22.04.2014 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha asperella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

22.04.2014 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha asperella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

22.04.2014 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha asperella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

22.04.2014 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypsolopha asperella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

22.04.2014 4:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I had to repeat the transfer of photos. Peter apparently some glitch because the first time they were moved, and then flew off.

22.04.2014 4:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 4:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 4:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 4:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica saepestriata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 4:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica saepestriata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.04.2014 2:15, Irina Nikulina:

Inurois fumosa? (There are doubts among fumosa andInurois punctigera, which is found only in Sinev 40reg)

22.04.2014 0:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Description if there is anyone interested http://mapyourinfo.com/wiki/ru.wikipedia.org/Neozephyrus%20korshunovi/

21.04.2014 23:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Draw up a company in Basil otchёtoproizvodstve =)
Southern Urals Mountains, Bashkortostan, Ufa, 40 km from the south garden plots.
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526325&view=findpost&p=1480929

21.04.2014 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Continue ride well today. True Report "Zhuchin" :)
04/21/2014 of Vladimir region., Petushki district, env., Der. Older Omutischi: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526321&view=findpost&p=1480920

21.04.2014 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aldania raddei / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemaris affinis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemaris affinis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hemaris affinis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Callambulyx tatarinovi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 22:32, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, this image somehow joined a group of others. Species, divide them, please

21.04.2014 22:29, Irina Nikulina:

Aldania raddei

21.04.2014 21:48, Irina Nikulina:

Callambulyx tatarinovi

21.04.2014 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Hemaris affinisfeeds on Corydalis beautiful colors (Corydalis spiciosa Maxim.)

21.04.2014 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Hemaris affinisfeeds on Corydalis beautiful colors (Corydalis spiciosa Maxim.)

21.04.2014 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Hemaris affinisfeeds on Corydalis beautiful colors (Corydalis spiciosa Maxim.)

21.04.2014 21:39, Irina Nikulina:

Callambulyx tatarinovi

21.04.2014 20:56, Irina Nikulina:

Agonopterix heracliana ?

21.04.2014 18:41, Aleksandr Andrianov: This species is identified correctly.

21.04.2014 15:33, Roger Dolorosa:

Melanitis leda

21.04.2014 1:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica saepestriata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 1:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Japonica saepestriata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 1:28, Irina Nikulina:

Japonica saepestriata

21.04.2014 1:28, Irina Nikulina:

Japonica saepestriata

21.04.2014 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 1:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina ladonides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.04.2014 1:12, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina ladonides

21.04.2014 1:11, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina ladonides

21.04.2014 1:10, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina ladonides

21.04.2014 0:02, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, Shamil, in the wild in the woods near Vladivostok .. The only time managed to catch this predator on the scene)

20.04.2014 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Favonius korshunovi / Confidently identified / Female / Yuri Semejkin.

20.04.2014 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Two views coincide: an occasion to transfer :)

20.04.2014 23:48, Irina Nikulina:

I think you're absolutely right, Ure, only korshunovi females are blue mazochki- here are both visible.

20.04.2014 23:46, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha might be wrong, but to me it seems more like pruinosa

20.04.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia asteris / Tentatively identified / Jan van Holten.

20.04.2014 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now I agree with Alexander and Ian. Especially in the blue it has formed a number. inaccuracies. Time something goes. I put probably inaccurate in so far :)

20.04.2014 12:23, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I removed.

20.04.2014 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

About a lot of unknown subspecies lewesii: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/sphinx/d_elp.htm
It seems like he is listed as a synonym: Deilephila elpenor (Linnaeus, 1758) = Chaerocampa lewisii Butler, 1875
It is better to leave well :)

20.04.2014 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Anticipating possible questions on the underside of povleniya new photos I want to say it, I loaded them gradually to the previously loaded without butterflies underside. Work on the bugs, however :)

20.04.2014 8:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Shabby sample, but nevertheless I tend to variant Favonius korshunovi (female).

20.04.2014 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With Bright Resurrection of Christ!

I give all this zameatelny flower "Scilla Siberian", which was found 4.17.2014 me almost on the eve of the great feast in the woods outside Moscow that quite unusual for my sites. I do not know may be an introduction (near a large village), but it is a fact.For the first time in my life we ​​saw it in the wild :)

20.04.2014 6:00, Roger Dolorosa:

Could be Graphium agamemnon *

20.04.2014 4:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Belyanka Dulcinea -vesennee generation

20.04.2014 0:19, Shamil Murtazin:

A really red eyes? ..

19.04.2014 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina.

19.04.2014 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter asked you for a long time to fix here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6960
And here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/84525
Please follow the comments. The data I have or rather does not happen. They just received in the mail from a very summarized in this issue of a man who does not want to advertise themselves on the site.

19.04.2014 2:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris umbrana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.04.2014 2:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris umbrana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.04.2014 2:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lithophane, can be ustulata

18.04.2014 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Restored. Shamil, thanks for the comment. Apparently glyukanul yesterday, and I'm in a hurry did not notice (

18.04.2014 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

18.04.2014 9:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, why cut off the name of the national park? ..

18.04.2014 9:29, Shamil Murtazin:

What an interesting moment. Photos in the wild? )
Just today krasnotelok photograph ...

17.04.2014 23:07, Igor Sakhno:

Yes, she is! ..

17.04.2014 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I would like to invite all in this topic provide links to their reports (if any) on the nature ovylazkah, published on different resources: LJ Molbiol etc. I think all this will be interesting :)
To offer for your attention two start my report for the last two days.
Yesterday (04.16.2014), Vladimir region, Petushki district., Env. der. Older Omutischi:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php? showtopic = 526321 & view = findpost & p = 1480152
Today (04/17/2014), the Moscow suburbs:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526320&view=findpost&p=1480360

17.04.2014 19:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Luehdorfia puziloi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2014 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Luehdorfia puziloi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2014 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Luehdorfia puziloi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Luehdorfia puziloi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Luehdorfia puziloi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2014 19:07, Irina Nikulina:

Luehdorfia puziloifeeds on forest flowers marigold (Caltha silvestris Worosch.)

17.04.2014 19:07, Irina Nikulina:

Luehdorfia puziloiCamka lays its eggs on a leaf kopytnja Siebold (Azarum sieboldii Miq.)

17.04.2014 19:06, Irina Nikulina:

Luehdorfia puziloi

17.04.2014 19:05, Irina Nikulina:

Luehdorfia puziloiin the early-flowering honeysuckle (Lonicera praeflorens Batal.)

17.04.2014 19:04, Irina Nikulina:

Luehdorfia puziloi

17.04.2014 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.04.2014 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793

17.04.2014 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793

17.04.2014 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.04.2014 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793

17.04.2014 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is: Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793

17.04.2014 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The female is a "typical" forms: in quotation marks because it is-more "grandmother in two said" :)
In my edges, for example it is found much more often Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793.

17.04.2014 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.04.2014 9:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Both males :)

17.04.2014 9:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.04.2014 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793

17.04.2014 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793

17.04.2014 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.04.2014 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All such female green-gray color is Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1793 Here somehow on the page type, it is as synonymous: "Argynnis (Argynnis) paphia (Linnaeus, 1758) = Argynnis valesina Esper, [1798] is lost, what is considered right and therefore can not stand the discussion page of the form.

17.04.2014 9:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.04.2014 9:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.04.2014 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2014 7:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, then I stand. Just such coloring (she confused) is not seen even once although the form is very common and we :)

17.04.2014 6:41, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

17.04.2014 1:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It has been and I have a suspicion. Do not Let ventured .... More Powys.

17.04.2014 0:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tristrophis veneris / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2014 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina filipjevi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.04.2014 0:05, Irina Nikulina:

Euthrix potatoria
The other two types of DV-Euthrix - albomaculata laeta- caterpillars and very different

16.04.2014 23:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.04.2014 22:48, Irina Nikulina:

Celastrina filipjevi

16.04.2014 22:34, Irina Nikulina:

Tristrophis veneris

16.04.2014 22:33, Irina Nikulina:

Ypthima argus

16.04.2014 21:23, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps,Hypomecis punctinalis?

16.04.2014 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Orthosia paromoea / Tentatively identified Orthosia lizetta / Confidently identified.

16.04.2014 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

16.04.2014 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Orthosia paromoea Orthosia lizetta.

16.04.2014 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Originator according to which the amendment is made: "Schintlmeister, A. 2004. The Taxonomy of the genus Lymantria Hübner, [1819] (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Quadrifina 7: 1-248."

16.04.2014 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Originator according to which the amendment is made: "Schintlmeister, A. 2004. The Taxonomy of the genus Lymantria Hübner, [1819] (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Quadrifina 7: 1-248."

16.04.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.04.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

16.04.2014 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

16.04.2014 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

16.04.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lymantria brunneiplaga Lymantria orestera.

16.04.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lymantria brunneiplaga Lymantria orestera.

16.04.2014 16:54, Yuri Semejkin:

After specification 28601: Orthosia lizetta can be transferred to the exact.

16.04.2014 11:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Niphanda fusca / Confidently identified / .

16.04.2014 11:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loxostege sticticalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.04.2014 10:58, Irina Nikulina:

Niphanda fusca

15.04.2014 23:04, Irina Nikulina:

:) Now I understood more subspecies have to make now write.

15.04.2014 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

It Vladimer initially cast doubt on its own definition, but I did not notice :)

15.04.2014 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

15.04.2014 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Satyrium herzi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antigius attilia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antigius attilia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2014 22:32, Irina Nikulina:

Thank Basil, not quite understand why the inaccurate delivered, some doubts still remain?

15.04.2014 22:28, Irina Nikulina:

Satyrium herzi

15.04.2014 22:10, Irina Nikulina:

Antigius attilia

15.04.2014 22:08, Irina Nikulina:

Antigius attilia

15.04.2014 13:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiommata deidamia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2014 13:18, Shamil Murtazin:

We continue to "do it yourself" paper =)

A4 paper cut in half as well on the long side, then again in half the short


One such leaflet glue two drops of glue in the corners. It turns out such a "pocket" or "dumpling". At work, I found a SP-560UZ. it seems structurally the same.


We put on this very design of flash. It turns out a little "soft box", also known as a diffuser.

Butterfly is not found. He took the same model that yesterday :)

without flash. rigid contour shadow.


just the lens is worn on the flash. no shadow contour, but rich


+ diffuser sheet bottom frame worth as a reflector. no shadow contour, saturation decreased


+ diffuser cylinder. almost shadowless. (bottom of the frame, cylinder need to push closer, but that did not get the shot).


shadowless scheme.

Less shadowless scheme - in the absence of any volume.Shadows is not present =)

15.04.2014 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergienko, confirmed the identification and subspecies amurensis Warren, 1912, should be added to the page type.

15.04.2014 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tethea albicostata / Vladimir Bobow Tethea ocularis / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2014 11:23, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, Sasha, I agree, it is necessary to dig, as the time appears only 6 species in 37 reg. (this is a seaside octogesima- just in case), but many local subspecies. I looked very carefully, very inclined to Tethea ocularis amurensis Warren, 1912. This subspecies is represented Cajark on your molbiol-e http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=347465&view=findpost&p=915277

15.04.2014 10:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you, Ira, I looked, I did not like, but there are many types and you need to watch it. And now the time is not enough, but on top of that no options :)

15.04.2014 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vlad Proklov.

15.04.2014 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with you, Basil, but what determined Vlad was written, and it is not defined. I only then saw that there are a couple since the definition. Now write Vlad.

15.04.2014 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ivan Stogov Vlad Proklov.

15.04.2014 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The issue is quite controversial because the author's comments to the photo clearly says: "The definition of the form Vlad Proklov" Alexander, there should first figure out how Ivan was determined after the butterfly and stand definition. Oh, what, and in determining the Micra near Moscow, I personally believe in the definition of Vlad.

15.04.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2014 2:20, Irina Nikulina:

I think it is ratherTethea ocularis(or DV-view ampliata, it is necessary to look more in detail)

15.04.2014 1:51, Irina Nikulina:

Ypthima argus

15.04.2014 1:46, Irina Nikulina:

Lasiommata deidamia ?

15.04.2014 1:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lopinga achine / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.04.2014 1:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maybe something I did not see, but definitely no where it was :)

15.04.2014 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Ivan Stogov Eriocrania sparrmannella / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.04.2014 0:40, Ivan Stogov: This species is identified correctly.

14.04.2014 22:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, the excellent Olympus camera down, he knows how to take pictures in RAW (my 510UZ can). It's very convenient format - can be a little tweak exposure and white balance to rectify. Allow me, tomorrow I will take a time-ait - prepared. And tomorrow I will lay out a variant of the lens. But he, too, the paper :)
Basil, in the photo below flashlight really weak.However, modern Light Flashlight is not very weak. Especially if there is focusing of the beam. But not the essence. The main thing that springs given enough light and evenly =)
I vote for the simplest an external flash with light traps. She then left, and, having put on the camera, will assist in macro in nature.The idea is not new cylinder. "Makrushniki" or "homeroom" used cone of thick white translucent plastic. Top narrow down expanding. Well, all sorts of spheres.
Peter, if you want, let's article and beautifully arrange somewhere online pribёm (footcloth and the such) ...

14.04.2014 21:41, Alex Dumchus:

Many sources divide them into two types P.hermeli (endemic to the north of Mindoro, the Philippines, described in 1991) and P.chikae. I have both, and they are really different from each other. MB it makes sense to add to the site view hermeli?

14.04.2014 21:11, Alex Dumchus:

Picture did Casio EX-H10, and recently acquired Olimpus SP-620Uz, but not yet butterflies Fota liked it normal optics and poss. making continuous series of images of different amounts, just for nature. It rises up flash.

14.04.2014 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

An interesting scheme, but want drbavit: highlight the need to at least three sides and not take a flashlight: this is not serious for large, tropical animals who have a wingspan of 15 cm. And above, and 3 lyumki SLR cold, white light. The sheet acts as a lens and distributes the light uniformly along the circumference.An interesting idea, and most importantly simple. Shamil, thank you :)

14.04.2014 20:46, Shamil Murtazin:

On the scene with Vanessa, I think it is clear that the outbreak was right. They shot in the right side a little "overcooked". More on the flash softbox dressed, but it is not critical, it is possible without it.
I can still worker-peasant version with on-camera (built-in) to flash =) if the model specify the camera - I can show direct "in place" so to speak.

14.04.2014 20:37, Alex Dumchus:

Clear. Thank you, Shamil. Everything is simple and clear. I'll try

14.04.2014 20:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander asked for the recipe - that's it.

Cut a sheet of A4 floated on the long side.


Merge narrow parts in the ring


lantern depicts the place pulsed flash.

In the case of continuous light - using light sources 2+ spaced at equal angles on a circle.But the world should be more then.

An example of this circuit frames (still waiting for the collections, and their all no, no):

14.04.2014 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eustroma aerosum / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucomelas juvenilis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2014 19:13, Irina Nikulina:

Leucomelas juvenilis

14.04.2014 19:12, Irina Nikulina:

Eustroma aerosum

14.04.2014 10:55, Peter Khramov:

Published on behalf of the Irina Nikulina .
April 13 marked two years since the untimely death of a remarkable man and a talented Far Eastern entomologist Meshcheryakov Vladimir Romanovich .Many entomologists his name is well known, and lovers of butterflies know it by the book Yuri Arakcheeva "In a country blue Swallowtail", in several chapters of which the author describes their joint Vladimir trip to Primorye and the story of the arrival of 16-year-old Volodya Meshcheryakov from the Urals to the Far East,where he met a couple of months with Alexei Ivanovich Kurentsova and was invited to work in his group. This meeting is all predetermined his fate - Vladimir forever remained in the Far East, and dedicated his life to the study of Far Eastern entomofauna.He was very enthusiastic, utterly devoted to his beloved entomology. Love of butterflies and he gave us his close friends. It is thanks to him that we, the people, in their education far from entomology, discovered the wonderful world of butterflies.In memory of Vladimir Meshcheryakov, we continue to publish his photographs taken in 2008-2011. Such was his desire - to bring these photos Site favor.
(Unfortunately, the picture remained without definition, so we will get to the truth together.)

14.04.2014 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Most likely exit and the date of release. As far as I know Andrew engaged in breeding.

14.04.2014 8:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In January?

14.04.2014 8:22, Alex Dumchus:

I do not spark anything. The flash on the camera. When a bright light and butterfly (recent M.absoloni) - not nichem- candle in the window. At the outbreak of the shadow appears on the left side of the butterfly. How do the cylinder in Kutch.Diffuser?
In general, the attitude towards the process of photographing butterflies (except for natural images) - not as an art - it is necessary to understand that there is still a scientific website, not Art Salon (Very sorry if someone accidentally hurt. This is my personal opinion) .As for the arts - he painted pictures, many insects, butterflies do panels of (secondary and dead specimens, of course), but put it here -by at least it would be strange ...

14.04.2014 2:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria leucocephala / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.04.2014 2:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria leucocephala / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.04.2014 2:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ophiusa tirhaca / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.04.2014 1:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha oedippus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2014 1:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coenonympha oedippus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.04.2014 0:56, Irina Nikulina:

Coenonympha oedippus

14.04.2014 0:55, Irina Nikulina:

Coenonympha oedippus

13.04.2014 22:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Now I know that as soon as you find her house - it is necessary to check the stocks of cereals and nuts :)

13.04.2014 22:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, and light what? .. If the flash sideways - you can make a paper cylinder as a diffuser. With conventional incandescent lighting is a significant weakening.
The same would probably wider cropped. In general, it is the proportion of the butterfly square, so it looks normal. It seems, at the discretion of the author =)

13.04.2014 21:02, Alex Dumchus:

I try to remove more shadow. The more butterflies in the frame - the better to determine. IMHO .Posmotrite least http://swallowtails.net/

13.04.2014 20:05, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Also I wanted to say about it, but was too shy ... Butterflies "closely" on the frame.

13.04.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the trunk I do not remember what :) Where it is possible to find almost everything: no difference. This is referred to as fishing occurred: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526320&view=findpost&p=1403350

13.04.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander than kadriruesh? Do not be so cut the "butt". The fields around the perimeter leave more :)

13.04.2014 19:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

caught on anything?

13.04.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Favonius taxila / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.04.2014 16:18, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, Ure, thank you! His subtle feeling of the living world, its amazing relationship and communion with nature, with the taiga, recognition butterflies literally shadows - all this is remembered by us.

13.04.2014 15:25, Yuri Semejkin:

I support the idea of ​​Irene continue to put pictures of Volodya Meshcheryakov, some of which she survived. It will be for the benefit of the site, all infatuated entomology and in memory of him. My acquaintance with Vladimir took first in the pages of an Internet correspondence, and then internally.Volodya amazing and multifaceted man, a hard worker and enthusiast not only in the entomological teaching us commoners who were interested in wildlife. Through an acquaintance with him, I thoroughly and irrevocably carried away butterflies - photographing them first and then growing them from collecting caterpillars and butterflies before departure.I always remember the warmth of our meetings and conversations, which I now do not suffice. Jura Semeykin

13.04.2014 14:21, Irina Nikulina:

Today marks two years since the untimely death of a remarkable man and a talented Far Eastern entomologist Meshcheryakov Vladimir Romanovich. Many fellow entomologists his name is well known. And the amateurs of butterflies he could be a sign of the book YuArakcheeva "In a country blue Swallowtail", in several chapters of which the author describes their joint Vladimir trip to Primorye and the story of the arrival of 16-year-old Volodya Meshcheryakov from the Urals to the Far East, where he had a couple of months met with Alexei Ivanovich Kurentsova and was invited to work in his group.This meeting is all predetermined his fate - Vladimir forever remained in the Far East, and dedicated his life to the study of Far Eastern entomofauna. He was very enthusiastic, utterly devoted to his beloved entomology. Love of butterflies and he gave us his close friends.It is thanks to him that we, the people, in their education far from entomology, discovered the wonderful world of butterflies. In memory of Vladimir, we decided to continue to fill open them on our website page of photographs taken between 2008 they -11gg, some of which survived.Such was his desire - to bring these photos Site favor. (Unfortunately, the picture remained without definition, so we will get to the truth together)
The first photo of the butterfly's favorite Vladimir family Lycaenidae - marshmallow
Favonius taxila

12.04.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyperlais dulcinalis / Confidently identified / Ozgur Kocak.

12.04.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Base: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Hyperlais_Dulcinalis
I stand ...

12.04.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2014 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well: I am having such a magical book of sin on the site keep their own uncertain butterflies :)
In your book, but more like a nominative .....
And the network mess with them:
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/lim2/721250010.html
http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/#!/sp/676/Euthalia-monina

12.04.2014 14:20, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hmmm ... I open "My magic book" (as Alexander said Dumchus) I see there is:





My butterfly is very similar to the one I pointed out a red arrow. I was wrong?

12.04.2014 13:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Who Is to Learn to identify Africans are welcome
http://trava-y-doma.livejournal.com/1085447.html

12.04.2014 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gonepteryx aspasia.

12.04.2014 11:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Gonopteryx aspasia Men

12.04.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Paramaxates spinivesica?
Paramaxates taiwana Yazaki, 1988 in my opinion is no longer because of geography: a new look and distributing for him at the moment was not only Taiwan, and Thailand is written here. I can not stand long, and stand up for discussion :)

11.04.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now, it is logical to remove from the string "Clarification of classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or larva of the third age" the assumption of the author photo with three question marks :)

11.04.2014 21:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

I got it from admin as the author's definition of matter. Basil, thanks for the speed, I probably rushed. but the view is not really defined. :)

11.04.2014 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This I pulled her out of the admin does not honor komenty. I do not have time to reset, sorry. As she wrote in the admin was listed below.

11.04.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have not write :)

11.04.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia populeti / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.04.2014 21:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Hmm ... I say that is not defined ...

11.04.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthalia monina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.04.2014 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree. A subspecies name: Euthalia monina kesava (Moore, 1859) Svetlana could write in my LC.

11.04.2014 21:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amorphogynia necessaria / Tentatively identified / Alexander Belousov Not identified.

11.04.2014 21:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

And who suffered a butterfly? I can not see anything and the transfer is not executed correctly.

11.04.2014 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, when loading photo Russian uninvited write anywhere is not necessary. Due to the fact that it was written "moth-moth tamariksovaya - Amorphogynia necessaria (Zeller, 1849)." Upload it as a vague and horrible for moderation. Who pulled under the Latin part of the name :)

11.04.2014 20:53, Irina Nikulina:

Euthalia monina, I think (most likely, E. m. Kesava (Moore, 1859))

11.04.2014 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lobesia euphorbiana / Zoran Bozovic Epiblema scutulana / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.04.2014 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lobesia euphorbiana / Zoran Bozovic Epiblema scutulana / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.04.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturnia pavonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturnia pavonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta auricoma / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 17:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta rumicis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 15:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligula boisduvalii / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.04.2014 15:45, Irina Nikulina:

It is) a close Caligula japonica other tracks.

11.04.2014 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caligula boisduvaliiseems to me, or someone close :)

11.04.2014 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta rumicis ?

11.04.2014 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta auricomalikely. "I'm afraid," I LW and therefore it is necessary that someone confirmed :)

11.04.2014 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is also similar to theSaturnia pavoniaso well as a goose on photo # 28511. Only here the penultimate age, 4th (black warts). What do you think? If there are no other opinions tonight bear both images.

11.04.2014 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Saturnia pavonia?
Last, 5th age. Only in this age of the caterpillar yellow warts (warts on other age black). Yes, and the blue of the form is there.

11.04.2014 0:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia artaxerxes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.04.2014 0:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia artaxerxes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.04.2014 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebia niphonica / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.04.2014 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Saturniidae. Now I can not see in the region, but I think that they were not very much and will be determined so easily :)

10.04.2014 22:43, Irina Nikulina:

Aricia artaxerxesor agestis?

10.04.2014 22:42, Irina Nikulina:

Aricia artaxerxesor agestis?

10.04.2014 22:17, Irina Nikulina:

Erebia niphonica

10.04.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia populeti / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.04.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia populeti / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.04.2014 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia populeti / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.04.2014 11:21, Peter Khramov:

Firstly, there is no logic in the Russian names to look for are not worth it. We present them for the sake of curiosity, as well as to people who know / remember only the name of the Russian could find their views. With this TZ The common name (ornithopter Elena) must be present.Secondly, ptitsekryl - it's just not very good translation ornithopters. Ie everything that in Russian is called an ornithopter, can be called and ptitsekrylami.
Thirdly, a more correct translation would not ptitsekryl and ptitsekrylka.
Fourth, we should not confuse the assignment algorithms Russian and Latin names.Yes, there are attempts to recommendations for Russian names, proposals for the binomial, but at least at this stage, there is no general scheme no. And rightly so. Haha do not need it. For Latin and involved not to fence the local garbage heap.
Fifth, back to where we started. Do not worry about the Russian names.And for the tenth time: view properties are discussed in the form, not the pictures on the page. There is also a link to the form, really press hard?

10.04.2014 10:33, Fyodor Pudovikov:

According to my observations in the Moscow region first instance Aricia artaxerxes marked May 30 as Aricia eumedon - on 31 May. This fresh Aricia artaxerxes observed throughout the summer until the beginning of September - very stretched their departure, and the number of generations is difficult to trace. At Aricia eumedon - one generation, years before the second half of July.while in the second half of June, is not a problem Meet a fresh copy, especially female. What concerns this sample, then IMHO, eumedon.

09.04.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Duc in my opinion they are not necessary. This I did, if there was a question. Logically something: Ptitsekryl correctly on the basis of the generic name :)

09.04.2014 21:59, Peter Khramov:

Basil, it's Russian name. Whether it is necessary to discuss them, except that the obvious glitches?

09.04.2014 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I beg you, do not give in to provocations Sergei Kotov, if not 100% sure not to transfer, according to his instructions. He, too, err, and to pull back here once again butterflies, do not we have the same kind of talked about it. Rhode Diarsia not easy, sometimes gives surprises. and do not pay much attention to his shouts.Do you have questions put to ill-defined.

09.04.2014 12:18, Alexander Belousov:

No names but with ID pics :-)

09.04.2014 11:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Exclusive ones :)

09.04.2014 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexandr, you seem to have added there pics of two species still being described as Sergiyenko said (according to Kostyuk), yet have no names :)

09.04.2014 10:38, Alexander Belousov:

The rest uploaded to MolBiol for IDs.

09.04.2014 7:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Ornithopters" or "Ptitsekrylki" , "Ptitsekryly" have a collective, the popular name for butterflies of three genera Ornithoptera, Trogonoptera and Troides . This tells me passionately unloved "folk" Wikipedia ": http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%F0%ED%E8%F2%EE%EF%F2%E5%F0%FB that in my opinion wrong.Subscribe to the proposal of Alexander: I do not have to call all the butterflies of this group "ornithopter". This name applies only to the kind of butterflies of the same name: Ornithoptera . You should not be like Wikipedia.

08.04.2014 23:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

If you pay attention on the shape of the wings, yes, (a comparison) is more like a artaxerxes.

08.04.2014 21:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euclidia dentata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.04.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.04.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.04.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.04.2014 21:10, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

08.04.2014 21:00, Irina Nikulina:

Sergei, the final conclusion of the experts leave (she is also the first comments tended to artaxerxes), but still want to note that the phrase "Eumedonia eumedon at the time of June 22 can not be so fresh" can not agree. Here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21799 evmedon completely removed June 18 at the same location, just to the meter and see how fresh. But this http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 22955 generally removed on the same day just an hour earlier discussed. And also quite new. Borovsky district (or rather village Ryabushko) actually borders on Mosk Oblast.

08.04.2014 21:00, Alexsandr Martukov:

Buck

08.04.2014 20:58, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

08.04.2014 20:58, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

08.04.2014 20:51, Alex Dumchus:

It seems to me that the Russian name "ornithopter Elena (Troides helena)" is incorrect. Then it is better described as "Ptitsekryl Elena." And the climb, you know, in another generation.

08.04.2014 20:46, Alexsandr Martukov:

That message here on the website, on the page of the form Aricia artaxerxes: "flight of time. In the Moscow region: the end of May - end of September. Message. Pudovikov Fedor." Borovsky district borders with the Moscow region ...
From late May to 22 June poistrepatsya could be healthy! :)

08.04.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diarsia brunnea / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

08.04.2014 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

According to the genitals, so the genitals (photo in nature this can not be a self-) ......
"Zeroed" .... sadly :(.
Collect collection, gentlemen :)

08.04.2014 18:59, Sergei Kotov:

It has been almost two weeks, I see no change. I am writing again. It is notDiarsia brunnea. It's eitherDiarsia rubi, orDiarsia florida(types rubi florida and do not differ in appearance only through the study of drugs genitalia). BecauseDiarsia brunneaphoto should be removed, at least in undefined. However, what I've been writing you? Do you want to err - err on.

08.04.2014 18:52, Sergei Kotov:

In appearance this butterfly that can only guess. But here come to the aid of the summer periods. The butterfly was photographed on June 22. Eumedonia eumedon usually starts to fly much earlier than Aricia artaxerxes. Butterfly on fresh photos. Eumedonia eumedon at the time of June 22 can not be a fresh (especially given the geography - Kaluga region.), It certainly would have been worn or frayed. While at Aricia artaxerxes in the last week of June has just begun years. Based on the above, my suggestion -Aricia artaxerxes, in imprecise.

08.04.2014 18:37, Sergei Kotov:

I thinkAricia artaxerxes

08.04.2014 18:37, Sergei Kotov:

It is more likelyAricia artaxerxes

08.04.2014 17:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Empty doll with a hole through which came the butterfly.

08.04.2014 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Perez similar to the photo # 28450 as being with him in the same group. Accordingly, the name of this determined the same.

08.04.2014 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clostera anachoreta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.04.2014 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

08.04.2014 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

08.04.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Larva / Marija Jaunkunga.

08.04.2014 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tholera cespitis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

08.04.2014 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.04.2014 14:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rothschildia orizaba / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

08.04.2014 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema blanda / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.04.2014 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OrEurema blanda? Some of the two. Blanda more inclined to stand in long and inaccurate.

08.04.2014 13:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.04.2014 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.04.2014 13:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

08.04.2014 13:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Ira defined Nikulin

08.04.2014 11:44, Irina Nikulina:

Euclidia dentata

08.04.2014 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euproctis similis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.04.2014 11:15, Irina Nikulina:

Euproctis similis

08.04.2014 9:48, Alexsandr Martukov:

Eugene Caroline last year wrote that they differ in the shape of wings.) I artaxerxes some other form, judging by the photos on the page artaxerxes here on the site.

08.04.2014 9:41, Alexsandr Martukov:

male

08.04.2014 9:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

male

08.04.2014 0:40, Irina Nikulina:

Aricia artaxerxes? Some doubts among artaxerxes and agestis remain, given the comments. to # 24289

07.04.2014 23:29, Irina Nikulina:

Wondered (without the underside) between females of these two living species here and raised the question)

07.04.2014 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, to justify your conclusion :)
After two rather similar species:Eumedonia eumedon(adopted on site system) andAricia artaxerxes? Females of both can be called ......

07.04.2014 20:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Just wanted to ask to make more copies of a photo :)
The page download CSV collection includes a phrase "Upload a new picture," which is not quite true.

07.04.2014 17:53, Svetlana Shchavelina:

OK, catch.

07.04.2014 14:17, Alexsandr Martukov:

Plebejus eumedon

07.04.2014 14:09, Alexsandr Martukov:

Similar - Aricia artaxerxes Northern Brown Argus.

07.04.2014 1:04, Irina Nikulina:

Aricia artaxerxes ?

06.04.2014 18:00, Alex Dumchus:

Svetlana. I would be very grateful if you do not difficult to throw me in the mail a photo of your magic books Stichophthalma cambodia together with the underside. I have three butterflies in a collection, the two exactly S.uemurai, and one, as I suspect - cambodia. The truth is all of Vietnam.

06.04.2014 13:53, Basil Sergienko:

Lycia sp. cm. comment on molbiol (objectified. butterflies)

05.04.2014 21:56, Alexander Belousov:

Slightly dried up, a small series of let down. Photos from both sides. Try to understand.

05.04.2014 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Achlya flavicornis / Sergey Talanov Lycia hirtaria / Andrey Ponomarev.

05.04.2014 14:02, Andrey Ponomarev:

Downloadable here a couple Achlya flavicornis and came here on this photo that tells me that instead of Lycia hirtaria it?

05.04.2014 10:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eurema hecabenext? I'm afraid I have to endure :) We must Reaffirmation.

04.04.2014 20:27, Peter Khramov:

People, well, so what can thread even offhand say?

04.04.2014 20:09, Alexander Belousov:

This instance is not the same that on boards, but identical. Who warmer, I have caught pieces 20. All males.

04.04.2014 20:06, Alexander Belousov:

SE Kazakhstan. Almaty region. Jungar Alatau mountain valley. pos. Suburban.
to light

04.04.2014 19:36, Andrey Ponomarev:

On molbiole post URL # 23149 also from Kazakhstan 01.04.2014 and the assumption Amorphogynia necessaria

04.04.2014 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I confess: I was not there and did not see. If this is Kazakhstan - I wash my hands. Just in my area, at this time, with the appearance of no one but hirtaria andApocheima hispidaria(more I looked like the first) and the like have not seen :) We are waiting for clarification of geography and a copy.

04.04.2014 18:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Emmelina monodactyla / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.04.2014 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, then all running on mobiole already discussed in the "Definitions of butterflies" whether Amorphogynia necessaria, whether Lycia degtjarevae, and maybe Lycia hirtaria. :)
The truth is unfolding there. Alexander, this is the same butterfly?

04.04.2014 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Offhand (if MO)Lycia hirtaria:) But endure without geography irresponsible. Will not.

04.04.2014 18:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

But geography can imagine.

04.04.2014 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.04.2014 16:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tethea ampliata / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.04.2014 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syndemis musculana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.04.2014 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syndemis musculana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.04.2014 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syndemis musculana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.04.2014 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syndemis musculana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.04.2014 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syndemis musculana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.04.2014 16:03, Irina Nikulina:

Thanks Basil! Now, of course, I can see the difference. But, and this kind of look, but with a sense knocked this time jpmoth.org) - there it is slightly different looks unimportant shots.

04.04.2014 15:09, Marija Jaunkunga:

Thank you! I set free. I do not know what to feed her.

04.04.2014 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Well, I say, who communicates with Alex, even if only in absentia, why not ask him directly floor business?

04.04.2014 13:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pasiphila rectangulata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

04.04.2014 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

I am in severe cases also turn to Matt, he always consults, and speaks the best option. but only determines the material in hand (in severe cases).

04.04.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you are 100% right about the label, there is the definition of a material that determine the author holds, sees the size of small parts, the lower wing and the opposite direction, when neohodimosti can cook. In the photo is different, with the often expressed the most likely match a particular type. especially in difficult cases. and it is not a definition.Most of the possibility of error, and a good specialist is abhorrent.

04.04.2014 12:27, Alex Dumchus:

Rothschildia orizaba

04.04.2014 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Question do not understand ..... And what of the attributive labels in collections? There, too, in the column det. write only his name no matter who identified? It is not clear ... If a person determines the material means it automatically gives consent to use his name. Without any permit or not.Otherwise, the labels would, in many cases would be wrong.

04.04.2014 12:05, Basil Sergienko:

It is not euritetsiya and Pasiphila sp., Likely rectangulata (Europe so precisely, and there on the blue of another similar-subcinctata)

04.04.2014 11:14, Irina Nikulina:

Eupithecia subfuscata? I think, too, can be inaccurate, Alexander, just because of the 40 species of Eupithecia 37th Region (+ coastal) was found about a quarter of the image

04.04.2014 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Colocasia coryli Colocasia mus.

04.04.2014 10:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colocasia coryli / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.04.2014 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

The question, agree Does Alex Matt, whatever its definition or assumption of photographs exhibited in the network ?. If you agree, then no problems. And no, then there is no question.

04.04.2014 10:15, Andrey Ponomarev:

I've done everything.

04.04.2014 10:13, Peter Khramov:

Ideas - it is very well to be silent in any case not necessary. With regard to the exchange - so you can look, how it looks, because an instance fotoy designated as an exchange. Regarding directories - do not quite understand. What we are looking at, and there is a separate directory "copies."A 2-3 knots - quite normal when the brow of interest, for example, all instances of that family. Is not it so? Regarding duplication - it's a bit confusing, yes, it would be necessary to think about how they are more separated from each other or to look different ...

04.04.2014 10:01, Peter Khramov:

When one or the other case, it is possible to do it any comments, you are right. When put to the definition of a regular one and the same person, then you can zaregatsya, the benefit of such people are very few.

04.04.2014 9:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Since the beginning of the season you, Mary! :)
You must plan? ..

04.04.2014 9:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, I saw a different functionality on two strands, but the text information to provide designated - duplicated. I think that it is possible to shrink. Just do not quite understand the sample at relatively high taxa, such as 2-3 knots of species - there is already a lot of copies (hopefully).Invited to reflect this functional integration in the site search, now called "Catalogue" or to create a separate directory instance.
The price is, do not deny it. It was understood that the illustrated form, and there is no price labels for sale / exchange, and therefore can not see the position of this text relative to the image. That's all.In general, of course, the working directory. Just been asked to look at and to express ideas. What to do. I would be happy if at least a couple simplify / improve the working conditions of all authors on the site :)

04.04.2014 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's what I had in mind: see. Examples are :)
The sentence "the world" online signup only due to determine the drive also not an option.
A field that is offered when loading: "Additional information / remarks.For example, the instance output from the pupa or Determination was carried out on a photo or any other additional information " in my opinion," it is the "for such cases. Moreover, this field is always active in the Old and the LC can be changed.

04.04.2014 1:17, Peter Khramov:

Moder may add after geography, and INT field geography. What is not the same thing. Det. if added, the only comment author photo and / or comments to fote on the site, as did Andrew. Both of these options are utilized today, but both are not the same, that define separate field.

04.04.2014 0:51, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, and you look, where the links lead. From the first to the taxa descriptions, and the second - to sample collection samples the taxon. Perhaps the first general can be removed, but so far it seems useful to.
As for the price - so for those instances where the price is, it is quite a output.

03.04.2014 21:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Why two nearly identical locks in [Tucson] and [Copies]?
You can not somehow make one?
And please make a copy of a photo and signature "for" / "exchange" with the price. And it is not fully functional yet shown =)

03.04.2014 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, maybe determined the geography of modernization after the add.
It will look like this: "The Moscow region., Orekhovo-Zuyevo district, pos.Topoliny. Det. Matov A."
Make?

03.04.2014 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Well so who Alexei knows, maybe offer him zaregatsya? The authors not necessarily go just to Rega was online, then you can put down in the definition. Not the first time since this situation is already ...

03.04.2014 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrei, Fill is defined in the author's comments in his LC.
Matov not in the list of authors and therefore it is impossible to set its definition.
For such determinations have to register authorship there :)

03.04.2014 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acronicta menyanthidis Acronicta auricoma.

03.04.2014 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acronicta menyanthidis Acronicta auricoma.

03.04.2014 19:44, Andrey Ponomarev:

It also Acronicta auricoma, identified Alexey mats.

03.04.2014 19:44, Andrey Ponomarev:

It Acronicta auricoma, identified Alexey mats.

03.04.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vitaly Gumenuk.

03.04.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleophora trifolii / Tentatively identified / .

03.04.2014 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

For Europe would be fine, but for DV in inaccurate, there may be something else there.

03.04.2014 13:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia subfuscata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.04.2014 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.04.2014 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

My opinion, the caterpillar is fully sootvetvstvuet idea of ​​Cucullia asteris. Hence, two variants of correct answers:
1. It really Cucullia asteris, at the Sineva it is listed for the adjacent region 28 in question. It can go further east, with such a huge baochka paleoarkticheskim habitat could easily.
2.This is another kind of caterpillar Cucullia, the caterpillars form a color or no in the net. egCucullia elongata.
But since scientists at theCucullia asterissimilar.

03.04.2014 13:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and for such animals is needed to determine the top

03.04.2014 13:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yeah. male

03.04.2014 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.04.2014 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.04.2014 1:51, Peter Khramov:

Who tests, note now number link goes to a page instance, well take a look illustration and example, although there are all similar to the directory.

03.04.2014 1:05, Irina Nikulina:

Eupithecia subfuscata, I think

02.04.2014 20:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zola terranea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.04.2014 17:46, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. It's okay, just too lazy to retype. A copied from the source

02.04.2014 11:04, Irina Nikulina:

Zola terranea

01.04.2014 22:17, Peter Khramov:

The system area you look page. And as if all the rules will be more variations of the sea.

01.04.2014 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.04.2014 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.04.2014 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.04.2014 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.04.2014 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.04.2014 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.04.2014 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.04.2014 21:02, Irina Nikulina:

female

01.04.2014 21:02, Irina Nikulina:

female

01.04.2014 21:01, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander in the first comment wrote, male

01.04.2014 21:01, Irina Nikulina:

Female

01.04.2014 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, what happened to your Caps Lock key has happened?

01.04.2014 17:06, Alex Dumchus:

One view from the 26972, but who is so beautiful ???

01.04.2014 16:56, Alex Dumchus:

It would be necessary for days, if not too lazy to give all my Paridesov underside ...

01.04.2014 16:28, Irina Nikulina:

I've been there too) If the definition given on underside, it seems, and faithful. Just because the underside can be from the other butterflies there because they are not connected in any way) and location shooting is not specified. But in any case not from the top phoebe.

01.04.2014 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For reference. It is for this photo from the author (and there seems to have underside): http://butterfly-guide.co.uk/species/fritillaries/val20.htm I do not know whether there is a true-definition :)

01.04.2014 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea phoebe Melitaea cinxia.

01.04.2014 16:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified / Simon Coombes Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.04.2014 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ancyluris inca / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

01.04.2014 16:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Two assumptions have coincided.

01.04.2014 16:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ancyluris inca / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

01.04.2014 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

White Lion 10.23.2013 2:58 predpolzhil correctly :)

01.04.2014 15:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diaethria clymena / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

01.04.2014 15:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parides sesostris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

01.04.2014 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Just do not phoebe, on account cinxia question, there still has Melitaea arduinna, where the photo?

01.04.2014 14:48, Alex Dumchus:

DIAETHRIA CLYMENA

01.04.2014 14:40, Alex Dumchus:

Parides sesostris

01.04.2014 14:38, Irina Nikulina:

And that's exactly phoebe? Instead cinxia?

01.04.2014 14:35, Alex Dumchus:

Och.pohozha on ANCYLURIS INCA

01.04.2014 13:51, Yuri Semejkin:

It is under the bark Betula sp. Dolly is alive, taken to cultivation.

01.04.2014 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Interesting question :) Of course not me.
There generally incomprehensible thing: that, whether synonymous, then, whether different types ...... he can not find the answer in any way.

01.04.2014 2:16, Peter Khramov:

Lord, on this page the list of species http://lepidoptera.ru/chup.php Papilionidea, which (apparently) is not on the site. You can check without thinking (of course, not every kind, and in general) - types of adequate, inadequate or need to add or synonyms our polls?
The idea must be adequate and quite a site fit.Well, that was the logic of the concept, in the beginning there is also a list of the genera of this superfamily, which also is not in our database.

01.04.2014 2:14, Peter Khramov:

Basil, in the section with the sources can be dozens of duplicate data, it is normal and even right and good. That's when there is data from a bad source that does not correspond to reality, that's when it's bad. Then we have to clean. And there is nothing more can not be.

01.04.2014 0:17, Peter Khramov:

What is planned?

31.03.2014 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way, it is planned: to leave Argus or the same as the Baldus do in the world?

31.03.2014 23:38, Peter Khramov:

It's funny that even the moderators are still times that a test for fauna Funete and into the blue ...

31.03.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

31.03.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia paromoea / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.03.2014 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthosia paromoea / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.03.2014 16:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander Good! Cool!!! I really counted 13 species ..
Rod really Orthosia, the same kind of more like a paromoea, but not guaranteed. This view Matov AY ZIN. As is inaccurate, you can probably move.

31.03.2014 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri. This kind of scoop Orthosia. The only but ... - you have about 10 species, and the only one that I knowOrthosia incerta, it is not. :)

31.03.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trabala vishnou / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2014 11:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It created genus and there look. It was not in the database.

31.03.2014 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, just a solid Hinduism today. First, Vishnu, Krishna and now decided :)

31.03.2014 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trabala krishna / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2014 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trabala vishnou / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2014 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All suffered to Canephora hirsuta because I know very well since childhood and regularly clearing the "pasus" it was under this transmission - the closest to home my point, though :)
And nobody except hirsuta it did not come across.
And she weaves Case consists of anything.

31.03.2014 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2014 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2014 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.03.2014 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I checked on funete for fun. Here, too, Ypthima argus Butler, 1866 is a synonym at Ypthima baldus : http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/ypthima/index.html#baldus In truth, he Sineva argus, but that view is not only in Russia.

31.03.2014 7:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

31.03.2014 7:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Type something to eat, but I do honestly now doubt the correctness of the determination. I hurry up in my opinion.
In general, as always, thread waste HERE: http://yutaka.it-n.jp/sat/41000001.html he called Ypthima baldus (Fabricius, 1775) , which is listed in the lepidoptera.ru synonyms from Y. argus.
Svashego permission blown into notochnye yet.

31.03.2014 0:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zizina otis / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

31.03.2014 0:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

And whether there is in Thailand this kind? Not sure ... Now there is no literature on hand ... But certainly there is a lot similar species, it is necessary to understand.

31.03.2014 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Zizina otis

30.03.2014 16:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Automeris chacona / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.03.2014 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima argus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.03.2014 15:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lycaena hippothoe / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.03.2014 11:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Hmm ... With Sinev on DV bolshiiiie problems ...

30.03.2014 11:06, Irina Nikulina:

That's right, legal, and saw an article in Wikipedia, and others. Ist, but we adhere Sinev, and there is this kind of - Epatolmis caesarea, which is available here, so Alexander and offers to combine these two pages.

30.03.2014 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notophyson heliconides / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.03.2014 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thyridia psidii / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.03.2014 9:40, Alex Dumchus:

Notophyson heliconides

30.03.2014 9:34, Alex Dumchus:

Thyridia psidii

30.03.2014 3:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Er, about this kind of Phragmatobia luctifera has a record in the internet.
Distribution [edit source code]

The species is widely distributed in the Palearctic.Central, Southern and Eastern Europe (except for northern areas), Asia Minor, southern Siberia, from the Amur region to Korea, the Caucasus, the Amur region, Primorye, Altai, Baikal, Japan, Southeast China [1]
(Wikipedia)

30.03.2014 3:46, Yuri Semejkin:

I found in an Internet recording Phragmatobia luctifera (Denis et Schiffermuller, 1775) invalid name
The valid name Spilosoma caesarea Goeze, 1781
Record checked expert Andrey Rozenberg (2012-05-16) Here is a link http://oopt.aari.ru/bio/10914

29.03.2014 23:22, Irina Nikulina:

Oh, those delights taxonomy)) idёt- head around at me as a layman)

29.03.2014 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

These two pages should unite, it is one kind.

29.03.2014 23:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, was determinant in my drawing, not a photo view. Therefore, no clues :)

29.03.2014 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, three years, all female bears scoops steel :) I do not remember what was necessary to put that into the blue.

29.03.2014 22:53, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, and there can be no mistakes with the synonymous? I do not know that there is a base, but Phragmatobia luctifera on Sinev in Russia is not (only amurinsis and fuliginosa), butEpatolmis caesarea(bear grim) in Russia in 19 regions is (including in Primorye) and the views of the site is also available (maybe later it made to the database ..?)

29.03.2014 22:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea sutschana / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.03.2014 22:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea sutschana.

29.03.2014 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea ambigua / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodoneura shini / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Shamil Murtazin.

29.03.2014 21:55, Irina Nikulina:

I think of the 3 seaside Rhodoneura -Rhodoneura shini
http://szmn.sbras.ru/picts/Heterocera/Thyrididae/Rhodoneura_shini.htm

29.03.2014 21:49, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander, on the Sinev intermedia standing in synonyms for ichnea, so I think it's fair to point Shamil author of determination

29.03.2014 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphydryas ichnea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 21:20, Irina Nikulina:

I suppose thatMelitea sutchana
http://www.nature.chita.ru/Insects/Lepidoptera/Nymphal/melitaea_sutschana.htm

29.03.2014 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

As I anticipated, on lepiforum.de http://www.lepiforum.de/webbbs/media/f1_2012/79/79426_1.jpg exposed photos, and I definitely was not specified. Zoran, you are working with a number of sites that need to be correct and prevent such missteps.

29.03.2014 14:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Gates in general, yes.

29.03.2014 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Jury if there infa that three species in the genus are determined only by the genitalia, but they have the same appearance, so we can safely for all three types of floor and drive a business, that's all.

29.03.2014 12:32, Irina Nikulina:

Melitaea ambigua

29.03.2014 12:17, Irina Nikulina:

In A.I.Kurentsova it Melitaea intermedia, book Yu.P.Korshunova (2002) this type is given as Hypodryas ichnea (Boisduval, 1832), some sources Euphydryas intermedia (Ménétriés, 1859), but Sinev - Euphydryas ichnea ( Boisduval, [1833]) (synonymous with him - intermedia, has already written) Here we have two names and all synonyms registered to the form intermedia http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8591. With this need to somehow figure out a photo transfer toEuphydryas ichnea, Sinev time we adhere to.

29.03.2014 11:41, Irina Nikulina:

It turns out, I was the third, which suggested sutschana. Now I look - that is pre-determined.

29.03.2014 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Herminia stramentacealis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.03.2014 10:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, I agree with your conclusions, but if you could see the lower wing, the issue would be dropped :)

29.03.2014 3:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Shamil! And if you try only the top? It seems to me that shot still have a lead. Pay attention to the front costal margin. In between it and the root apex of the wing is clearly visible black stripes running in the direction of the apex and descends in the form of a sling. The main emphasis: black, bold stripe on the costal margin, - at least for others.species like never saw. On the whole pattern looks like.

29.03.2014 2:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! Under item 2. To drive the Old section add data about form-is necessary to have this kind of olredelenie.
Alexander ! 1. Photography is my one of a kind .; 2. If Kirpichnikova (and apparently, etc.) Are right, then to the photo type it is necessary to attach a snapshot of the genitalia, or at least indicate that cooking was.Then add the section data can be, can be somewhere to add something for infe. In this shot, -It offer to cook and to define precisely, but did not work, the material was gone. You can certainly try this year to ask, to cook, but if there are many that do not depend on me.I myself have never engaged in cooking and as I said, it's not so easy.

28.03.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.03.2014 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is the top and underside on photo # 14510. It is indicated in the LC and to group :)

28.03.2014 21:58, Alex Dumchus:

Ok.Rezerviruy. I'll take it when it's screen.

28.03.2014 21:37, Peter Khramov:

Pins have a couple of packs of labels, if you want, for you Reserve. The SMS comes order number on it, and will find no name, and the fastest ...

28.03.2014 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23570 may scrub in the column spread a private message to Sergei about Malaysia. View the corner of the area catches even Palearctic and I drove a detailed, wide distribution. "Malaysia" it is not necessary IMHO

28.03.2014 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema hecabe / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.03.2014 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite aEurema hecabeThere and away :)

28.03.2014 18:42, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. I've received the parcel. Thank you. Waiting for the screen and pins. The next time you write the name, and then looking for.

28.03.2014 18:22, Irina Nikulina:

Totally agree, Alexander forgot to write) A male next summer and he - with a nice purple tint)

28.03.2014 18:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trotocraspeda divaricata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.03.2014 18:20, Irina Nikulina:

Trotocraspeda divaricata

28.03.2014 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

On the third, only one kind and the other kind. A kind of ussurialis (Bremer, 1864), and the kind and volume. it is necessary to clean up the race and all this to bear :)

28.03.2014 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2014 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.03.2014 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

28.03.2014 18:07, Peter Khramov:

1. foty butterflies which can be determined only up to genus or higher will be able to attach to these, supra, taxa. Now it is driven around in a section of the collection as a run-in - will do for still images is similar.
2. Types that are apparently one in one or similar appearances - a good sign, it is necessary to use it.To do this, first to drive the Old Section of adding data on the form, appearance and subsection Unlike similar, and then on the basis of such information can be gradually repaired formal indication of similarity / identity, where you can show foty / views.
3. missing species: Is not it: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/21423?

28.03.2014 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would say that the female.

28.03.2014 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, see what you have written, and this is a reason, such as to connect these types, which do not differ in appearance. And if there is a photo, it must be visible from all three species. Peter, it's technically possible to do?

28.03.2014 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seriously, from 5 species of this genus that are for LW from three just such a painting, alas. But what is interesting at the blue of Russia for their 6 and on the website are only 4, Peter, where another 2? jessica (Butler, 1878) and taiwanensis Yamanaka, 1972

28.03.2014 17:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes anywhere Basil. I repeatedly offered to Peter to create a separate column for just such cases where no cooking is today considered impossible to determine the type. Data on biology to determine the same yet.
Option to inaccurate. If there is a desire to please. Three choices, you can either write ....

28.03.2014 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

The doctor said the morgue, then to the morgue. :)
If the author of a monograph on the moth DV, speaks only of the genitals, then on a photo or like. remain sp. For these types of option definition only if a copy of the photo attached, and the quality thereof is not important, but this is only for advanced toward entomology photographers. :)

28.03.2014 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And how do get them out? Genitals something ..... Can purely habit in inaccurate where? :)

28.03.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achaea janata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.03.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Achaea janata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.03.2014 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Calliteara horsfieldii / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.03.2014 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.03.2014 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.03.2014 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.03.2014 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.03.2014 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.03.2014 21:26, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Normal scanner and I have. But I just ruin, broken thing, if they use it. Again, I repeat: if you need a photo of some certain - it's no problem, because 4-5 shots do not burdensome.

27.03.2014 20:50, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, Svetlana honestly said above, that does not want to do it. Therefore, the maximum that would be correct - is to ask her book for a while in order to remove the Old with the guarantee that the state of books from this process will not change much.

27.03.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

943 pages because ...... Though there imager (although the usual tablet) and I would not have taken (
This Well-how much time is necessary (
Simply Svetlana it attributed to some "office" specialized :)

27.03.2014 17:07, Peter Khramov:

No.

27.03.2014 13:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Can a girl perefotat book?

27.03.2014 10:45, Irina Nikulina:

So I did not expect this March meeting) Yes, even "home delivery")) Although seen on the network and still earlier pictures of this species (in Moscow) - 16 March. Thank you, Basil!

27.03.2014 8:37, Svetlana Shchavelina:

If someone is looking for information on any particular species - the pictures do the right pages to the camera, not a question.

27.03.2014 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, congratulations on a successful and exciting season!
An interesting because last year he put together this kind in Moscow, in Izmailovo Park, only 21 of April.
What early spring this year :)

27.03.2014 8:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And if the camera? "Moth of Thailand" is not a fact. Therefore, I wrote on these DR

27.03.2014 7:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good morning everyone :)
And Shipunova: http://ashipunov.info/shipunov/school/sch-ru.htm no it was not looking.
The library is large and as the saying goes, "you never know" :)

26.03.2014 23:30, Irina Nikulina:

That's the way to start the season without leaving the apartment)), the window flew into the evening .. The March temperature records beaten in Moscow - that's the result)

26.03.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.03.2014 17:58, Peter Khramov:

There iponsky umbrella. Traps such. I'll give 900 rubles. someone who will promise a detailed review.

26.03.2014 15:18, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Moscow
Only if someone take care of it, to do the most to me somehow ... because I personally this edition, and so I have.
A "Moth of Thailand" I, if memory serves, is also seen. And, again, if memory serves, there is not one ...

26.03.2014 15:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Svetlana, find the office and you can agree or remotely, but carry a book, etc. - Is another question ...
Which city look? ..)

26.03.2014 14:31, Svetlana Shchavelina:

If someone will take up the matter - I do not mind :)

26.03.2014 14:06, Shamil Murtazin:

You can try to contact a large library.
There may now be a book scanners.

26.03.2014 13:40, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hee hee .. In her 943 pages and a thickness of 5 cm. The scanner specific needs.

26.03.2014 13:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Scan to this book, but to share with colleagues. And in the following DR ask Moth of Thailand

26.03.2014 12:02, Svetlana Shchavelina:

There is such a thing ...
I was here recently in Thailand on business .. Well, Thai comrades know that it is possible, I take pictures of butterflies, if you have some spare time and a suitable object for shooting. Before leaving, I presented a gift on the eve of the birthday.Well, according to our rules gifts for birthday can not be deployed for the event, he explained waited ... It was a thick book weighing 2.5 kg (thank God, I have gold card "permanent Flyer" and excess baggage does not threaten me) "Butterflies Thailand. " I'm in shock...That is now a clear vision to upload photos to the gallery without defining in a quiet hope that here come the specialists will determine ????????????

26.03.2014 9:48, Shamil Murtazin:

One Nymphalis xanthomelas back in January found in the house)
Since the beginning of the season 2014!

26.03.2014 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hind wings poddtyanut only closer to the front ....
Horsham sits :)

26.03.2014 7:01, Shamil Murtazin:

is expanded once =)

26.03.2014 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.03.2014 5:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Due to the overwhelming number of the picture count of Phoebis sennae stand photos to it. Another solution comes to mind :)

26.03.2014 4:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.03.2014 4:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander. Just this author often encountered nepoymi-some indication of gender. That imago and claimed for secure :) Now back true.

26.03.2014 1:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

So with Tami andrakonii only a male can be what he do not like Basil? :)

25.03.2014 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Imago.

25.03.2014 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glyphodes multilinealis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.03.2014 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nausinoe geometralis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.03.2014 23:34, Irina Nikulina:

Glyphodes multilinealis
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/63_Crambidae/6109_Pyraustinae/610905900_Glyphodes/610905913_Glyphodes_multilinealis_1666/Glyphodes_multilinealis.htm
http://www1.ala.org.au/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=slideshow.Slideshow&g2_itemId=12780

25.03.2014 23:26, Irina Nikulina:

Nausinoe geometralis
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=273294
http://gaga.biodiv.tw/9708bx/356.htm

25.03.2014 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhagades pruni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.03.2014 21:55, Irina Nikulina:

Suppose that in the photoRhagades pruniBut a few confused too bright shade of blue wings. A similar tone occurs in the form Artona martini Efetov, 1997 at the Japanese site and article V.V.Dubatolova and AM Long «Macroheterocera Bolshekhekhtsirsky Reserve (near Khabarovsk)" (2007) is an indication that in the Primorye and Wed.Priamure uncommon zygaenidae Artona (Amuria) cyclops (Staudinger, 1887) Her image is not found. Therefore, to eliminate the kind of pestryanok Artona, sought the help of prof. Efetov KA Today came his reply confirming that the photograph Rhagades pruni. So it can be transferred into accurate.

25.03.2014 19:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

25.03.2014 19:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.03.2014 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agonopterix heracliana / Vitaly Gumenuk Agonopterix ocellana / Tom Tams.

25.03.2014 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agonopterix heracliana / Vitaly Gumenuk Agonopterix ocellana / Tom Tams.

25.03.2014 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pleuroptya harutai / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

25.03.2014 11:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Pleuroptya harutai Inoue. Defined Kirpichnikova VA

25.03.2014 5:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Postpone the course.
Only after April 10 will be able to pick up simple: call each other.

25.03.2014 1:32, Peter Khramov:

You put off until April 10 need?

25.03.2014 0:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Slightly observations on two similar species of butterflies in the Moscow region.
It is only in the last few yearsNymphalis xanthomelasbecame our masoovym and common species, and earlier it was very rare and some misunderstanding before, now she has the status of "third category. Rare species" in the Red Book Moscow Region: http://kkmo2.verhovye.ru/rb/bspozvon/nymphalis_xanthomelas.php
But the other, who was formerly the usual formNymphalis polychlorosdisappeared completely.
That's miracles, because miracles :)

24.03.2014 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you Irina for gratitude. I am sincerely glad that no one in their delights :).

24.03.2014 22:38, Irina Nikulina:

These xanthomelas today in the city also saw 5 pieces) - in such a surprising March weather, all records beaten! Thank you, Basil! I know the feeling of joyful expectation of wonder and discovery of a new season!)

24.03.2014 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Although section and "not about butterflies" nazavaetsya ...Meanwhile, at least just want to congratulate all my colleagues With the coming season 2014 !!!
Today I decided to scout out how it deals with the first spring beetles things in nature (more "zhuchist" I'm still living) :)
Away from home for a couple of kilometers away and right in town at the moment saw the beginning of the violence of nature ..In short: "Season 2014" in Muscovy began !!!
Each year, as a little of the time happy about it! How many wonders yet to come? Innumerable :)
Congratulations, dear friends !!!

24.03.2014 17:50, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. I myself understand. They are a little bit smaller Danaides, less bright, but most importantly, the abdomen, at the Danaides is a thin elongated, almost like gelikonisov, and these, like the Nymphalidae. And so, all four found the female-gipolimnasy little different even from each other in the dark, and color spots.

24.03.2014 12:37, Tom Tams:

I think this image is Agonopterix ocellana rather than heracliana *

24.03.2014 12:36, Tom Tams:

I think this image is Agonopterix ocellana rather than heracliana *

24.03.2014 11:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Zoran, when you post on other sites, some are pictures of butterflies, it is desirable to indicate who defined them.
http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=79426
You had to lay out your definition of Cydia pomonella, then you would have had no problem. Now, in the case of placing your photo on the site lepiforum.de, the author of the definition would mean you, but it does not have the right :)
Please further avoid such situations.

24.03.2014 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I start to sound the alarm :) running out of pins with these tropics (
And the season is about to begin .....
Realistically, there will take a small party after approx. April 10?
It needs black №1, №2 and №3 Total 500pcs. Total: 1500sht.

24.03.2014 9:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes Il, the same. And the same with the autograph and wishes of the author.

24.03.2014 7:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia biblis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2014 7:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uff .... :) But still drove to scratch turnip had little ......

24.03.2014 6:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia biblis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.03.2014 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trotocraspeda divaricata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2014 5:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lophophleps triangularis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.03.2014 5:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, as the source. I just can not find where the data for driving. But I try again today.

24.03.2014 2:49, Peter Khramov:

Basil, corrected.
Site: even I do not understand, you mean, as a source of it just added? So it is you can do, and anyone zaregalsya page literature. I think you're talking about driving a centralized data.

24.03.2014 2:45, Peter Khramov:

According to para. 1 think the negative outweighs the positive. To quickly jump down the page to the commentaries, you can use the End button on your keyboard (not help if a lot of comments, because the latter will be much higher than the basement of the page).
According to para. 2 will write a new version of a help.

24.03.2014 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Wow, how many.

24.03.2014 0:06, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, only closer to the night read it, it's you we incognito)) Thank you! It is the same with dandelion green book (with the States. Inscription) "presentation" that you took in September 2010?) In it so much information? (photo to remind you poslala-)

23.03.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here is what is on it naryl: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=184446&view=findpost&p=1457641
Pavel Morozov, a man who knows a lot about hohlatok and so I am inclined to trust him completely.

23.03.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cethosia cyane / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

23.03.2014 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cethosia cyane / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

23.03.2014 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Underwritten like the most recent data. Therefore, it can, until we understand to be in a Euhampsonia :) Quite a rare appearance on the network so debriefing will take time.

23.03.2014 20:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Yuri, what you early spring. We have not yet melted snow :)
Basil, about the Red Books have already written. Feeling that kind of added to the most beautiful and demand in the market. On the one hand, it is certainly correct: it is necessary to reduce the demand. However, the real endangered and rare species in it is simply not made.

23.03.2014 20:49, Alex Dumchus:

Well, I suppose that it is the male Cyane

23.03.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, uploaded ..... (But it is already known as Gangarides gigantea (Druce, 1909) (

23.03.2014 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Yes, beautiful.

23.03.2014 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cethosia cyane / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2014 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cethosia cyane / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2014 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is (by clicking on the link to realize that he did the same) :)

23.03.2014 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cethosia cyane ?

23.03.2014 20:08, Alex Dumchus:

Agestor me there, that's P.sita not. But it is easy: at Parantiki rear wings - rounded and have Agestora, like virtually all Chilas pryamye.on in my collection next to the paradox that I, too, Unlike eploei multsiber only the section of the wings. Accidentally fell into a collection, you can say, lucky in the mix with Eploeyami.

23.03.2014 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let's try to distinguish. :) Although it is difficult to exhibit.
Alexander, you look better on thePapilio agestorandParantica sitais all super "Sweet Couple" :)

23.03.2014 19:41, Alex Dumchus:

Wai dzhyan Mom! Ahrenet! I looked in Google missipus female. One person. And as I let them go .... but still left. recently audited and straightened neraspravlennyh- only as to distinguish them? Can you, Basil? I think I have one there and straightened. It is less monarch. What other symptoms?

23.03.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Under Chrysippus obrztsovo mimics the femaleHypolimnas misippus: http://www.biodiversityexplorer.org/insects/insect_mimicry/index.htm Alexander, and you do not have an hour in the collection of the female? This is where to put. And then there is one male, ponimaesh :)

23.03.2014 18:55, Alex Dumchus:

For Tsetozy at least two species, of which I caught in Tae, characterized by a slow leisurely flight, almost like D.shrysippus under which they seem to mimic, at least I have not caught pervuyu- thought it monarch.

23.03.2014 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Since the spring !.
The truth is we have in Ministry of Defense is not a lot of insects. From some butterflies winteringNymphalis xanthomelasubiquitous had seen me today. And in one place as much within a quantity of 6 fish per 1.5 square meters of the fence :) And for that it is only in the Red Book of the Moscow region.? I can not imagine :)
Good luck all season, which is still coming! And how many more discoveries ahead ..........

23.03.2014 13:27, Yuri Semejkin:

And not for Alexander! Good luck everyone !

23.03.2014 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Igor usually indicate the author of determination on the site of the first to point out the correct name in any form as: Can this kind of Aaaaaaa AAAA, this butterfly reminds me Ppppp pppp. If a person comes and says this is exactly Aaaaaaa AAAA, it is still the author of the first definition.You have specified the old name for this species, now called differently, but that has not changed is correct, everyone understands what was certhia auct. Now tancrei. It would be correct to indicate two determined, but this site is not possible.

23.03.2014 13:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank Il! Spring started early today, so many flies which-that not only butterflies. Lyudorfii have not seen, but it seems to be already too.Anyway, the day peacock eye already have, and in fact they are in the spring flight begins at the same time feed on one of the first flowering, plants Adonis amurensis, Salix siuzewii and Salix schwerinii, at least hang on them, other flowering plant, just not yet. And so from year to year, in early spring.
Since I started writing, I congratulate all with spring and matured, -schim. season.Good luck to all the photoshoot and new discoveries !!!

23.03.2014 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri thank you for clarifying the situation. Now just need to decide to make an adjustment in the blue or not. I am personally against it.and on the page of the form, it is necessary to point out that this kind of Now has a different name in the window "Synonyms and combinations of the generic" and the search engine will then issue the vyd, and will be a new directory under him all Peter remake :)

23.03.2014 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

this is something I do not hit. :)

23.03.2014 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

23.03.2014 12:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, then you Yury second :) I just 3177 (this is 3178's) message is already no anonymity. It is interesting: it is necessary to try "a guest" write :)

23.03.2014 12:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Post I threw, only to get it somehow anonymous, that's written after that are designated as incognito.
On the Kirpichnikova Alexander, she actually many publications from different magazines to articles in various books. The most complete infa in the book, which I link to privel.Tam infa purely for ognёvkam.Description and drawings. The figures unfortunately, for the most part small, have some piece of shots.

23.03.2014 11:46, Igor Ivannikov:

I believe that the author should definitely be Irina.

23.03.2014 11:39, Irina Nikulina:

Thanks for the detailed "excavation", Sasha. Still Stericta .. But we have yet to Lepidogma her stay, as I understand it?

23.03.2014 11:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

That is not my message, I usually dogonku announce it I was. :) And with the work Kirpichnikova would be interesting to learn, for general knowledge.

23.03.2014 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nymphalis vaualbum / Yuri Semejkin Polygonia c-album / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2014 11:21, Irina Nikulina:

With the opening of the season, Ure! This year has turned out bright and early) Soon lyudorfii probably fly. In 2012 I first saw in mid-April ... But then the cold bylo..Myslenno with you favorite places)

23.03.2014 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, just thisPolygonia c-album:). A self-stand.

23.03.2014 11:18, Irina Nikulina:

Of course, not against - and in this case, and in the future) main thing - that was the right definition. Moreover, in those years, when the butterfly was caught, these two species were considered synonymous (but they have different tracks))

23.03.2014 10:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Butterflies March

23.03.2014 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sometimes Alexander is from time to time :)

23.03.2014 10:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Something like a message incognito happened ....

23.03.2014 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it must be removed at all: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120490. And here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120489 have to write instead Lophopleps Lophop h leps (insert one letter h ). Shoals I had done yesterday.

23.03.2014 8:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia orithya / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2014 8:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia orithya / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.03.2014 8:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C another endemic to Borneo in 1988 describing all :)

23.03.2014 8:48, Alex Dumchus:

And characteristically, they live much brighter than blue vysushennye- directly when flying. Maybe it's due to the humidity of the environment?

23.03.2014 4:25, :

Generally it Stericta kogii Inoue & Sasaki, 1995. That's what they called it.
Now a little history. Hampson, 1900 speaks of it as a Stericta atribasalis Hmps. Next Inoue, 1982 calls it Lepidogma atribasalis Hmps; Further Kirpichnikova 1999 also calls it Lepidogma atribasalis and finally Inoue and Sasaki, 1995 describes it as it is now accepted -te Stericta kogii. Source: VA Kirpichnikova Ognёvki fauna of the Far East of Russia, 2009, page 111.

23.03.2014 1:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, thank you for the clarification, I think you do not mind, if the definition of authorship Igor leave for?

23.03.2014 1:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Brahmaea certhia Brahmaea tancrei.

23.03.2014 1:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta strigosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.03.2014 23:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Great, America. And when the American view of the Old delaesh falls to it as a private message to spend. Nekuzyavo.

22.03.2014 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Igor when exactly Primorye, theBrahmaea tancreiin a directory. Ed Sinev only this kind of Primorye Set (with commentary to it - an erroneous determination: certhia auct.)

22.03.2014 22:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Suggestions.
1. Following the publication of the post, the screen is moved so that you can see the added post.
Pros: On long threads have to scroll down to check the correctness of his position.
Cons: some disorientation when "unexpected" hopping screen.
2. Offer to do something like Tutorials for "newcomers" on the site.That is, in principle, and now everything is painted a lot of text. However, there are dark areas that sort of discussion, but there are not secured - only in the discussions. For example, framing and lighting on straightened photos.
Probably, the first phase is to start with the FAQ ...

22.03.2014 22:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Shadowless fotochek-twins done. I look forward to the launch. =)

22.03.2014 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina.

22.03.2014 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Men word-law :)

22.03.2014 21:40, Igor Ivannikov:

Inferior right to determine the type of Irina.

22.03.2014 21:09, Irina Nikulina:

Do not need to change anything, for me it does not matter whose definition will most likely Igor simply drove right look, and then I noticed it finished writing, and I have not seen since this site was not updated for a long time, not yet specified whether there is dissimilis in Primorye.

22.03.2014 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sauris contorta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.03.2014 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sauris eupitheciata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.03.2014 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ideopsis similis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.03.2014 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's the same thing: in the morning and when I made a mistake will be corrected - bear.

22.03.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the control picture. Make no mistake, when hammered form morning is not set, I confess. It is necessary that Peter corrected and then transferred. In this race, by the way is only one form this. Therefore, it was apparently not in the directory.

22.03.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectephrina semilutata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.03.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. If Igor honestly say that the title has added after the definition in my LC where it is impossible to sort through hour after uploading photos to move: put another definition. Once upon a time there were similar situations and I, when I determined someone butterflies ...

22.03.2014 20:26, Irina Nikulina:

Ectephrina semilutata
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.2_Ennominae/2712_Ectephrina_semilutea/Ectephrina%20semilutea.htm (on foreign websites Ectephrina semilutea)

22.03.2014 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, a photo I found myself now in the admin for moderation. I do not know whose determination to put me .... confused, sorry.

22.03.2014 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Basil as the program will doleplena, see website.

22.03.2014 20:21, Irina Nikulina:

Sorry, Igor when signing definition view was not defined. Apparently, the page is not updated and do not see that you have signed the form next to the "imago". Or is it later ...? In general, do not understand)

22.03.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Igor, what kind of name is not there where it is necessary to write? Learn how to use the search, he works regularly on the site: the form and found "out of it" loaded. Total business somehow .... It is not the first time such an observation wing write if memory serves me, my serves.
Put definition Igor defined as the butterfly.

22.03.2014 19:42, Irina Nikulina:

Phyllosphingia dissimilis

22.03.2014 17:52, Maxim Schwarz:

Sorry, I overlooked. I shot netrupik. Not so close, yet shot. ;-)

22.03.2014 17:46, Alex Dumchus:

Rather Ideopsis similis. They are there in abundance

22.03.2014 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do the same kind of Trotocraspeda for this type: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/search/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=29920.0&&

22.03.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is a race, and in fact he is now valid. Did.

22.03.2014 5:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agathia divaricata Moore, 1888 (this genus in the catalog) is necessary to understand that validly now (it was too reluctant to make the genus). I'll come home and face it.

21.03.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysocraspeda sanguinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2014 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ericeia amanda / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2014 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

21.03.2014 23:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ericeia amanda / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2014 21:00, Irina Nikulina:

I not once met both Lophophleps triangularis, but this is not a synonym found
http://indiabiodiversity.org/observation/show/328959
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-10/sterrhini/sterrhini_2_2.php
http://www.flickr.com/photos/itchydogimages/8233224141/

21.03.2014 20:37, Irina Nikulina:

And it is also Ericeia amanda Walker, 1858
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/hulodini/hulodini_4_2.php

21.03.2014 20:36, Irina Nikulina:

I think that Ericeia amanda Walker, 1858
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/hulodini/hulodini_4_2.php
There is no kind of amanda

21.03.2014 20:29, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysocraspeda sanguinea Warren, 1896
http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/45/f9/34.html
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=394620
Here this species, not found in synonyms

21.03.2014 20:24, Irina Nikulina:

Trotocraspeda divaricata (Moore, 1888)
http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=42505
http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/45/f8/a9.html
There has not found this kind, possibly synonyms ..?

21.03.2014 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Metallaxis semipurpurascens / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.03.2014 11:18, Irina Nikulina:

Metallaxis semipurpurascens

21.03.2014 9:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Came the reply from Kirpichnikova VA It confirmed the accuracy of the determination. Pictured Pleuroptya ruralis

21.03.2014 1:14, Irina Nikulina:

I think this is one of Condicinae. Looked all 10 found in 37 species of the region + more 2-3 seaside. Most likely, this Oligonyx vulnerata. http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Hadeninae/Oligonyx_vulnerata.html
(There were doubts about the maritime Condica illecta
http://tokyoinsects.web.fc2.com/lepidoptera/oohoshimimiyotou.html)

21.03.2014 1:11, Irina Nikulina:

Sauris eupitheciata

21.03.2014 1:06, Irina Nikulina:

Sauris contorta

20.03.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oreta pulchripes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.03.2014 21:41, Irina Nikulina:

Oreta pulchripes (just colours changed, slide dated 1981 y.)

20.03.2014 18:29, Alex Dumchus:

Vasily, thanks for the correction. New species in my collection. So did I notice this one looked different from other lachesis. Have to get atropos, might anyone have it by the way? Trade to unspread lachesis.

20.03.2014 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polypogon gryphalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.03.2014 13:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polypogon gryphalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.03.2014 13:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xestia baja / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.03.2014 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parapoynx stratiotata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.03.2014 13:00, Irina Nikulina:

Suppose Herminia stramentacealis (Have some doubts as it as well looks similar to another Far Eastern species, dolosa, which is distributed though only in 39th region according to Synev).

20.03.2014 12:37, Zoran Bozovic:

I am not sure, see. please, first image, in second raw.
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Cydia_Splendana *

20.03.2014 12:17, Irina Nikulina:

Polypogon gryphalis

20.03.2014 3:03, Irina Nikulina:

Polypogon gryphalis

20.03.2014 2:38, Irina Nikulina:

Jpmoth describes this as Xestia tabida (same in China and Korea). According to Synev tabida is a Xestia baja synonym. Here on the website we've got both tabida and baja. Turns out Xestia baja in Russian Far East? (there was a discussion on these two species on molbiol.ru, http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=398963&view=findpost&p=1132388 )

19.03.2014 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra pyramidea / Zoran Bozovic Amphipyra berbera / Eddy Verfaillie.

19.03.2014 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Berbera for sure :)

19.03.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acherontia lachesis / Alex Dumchus Acherontia styx / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2014 23:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acherontia lachesis / Alex Dumchus Acherontia styx / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2014 23:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now moving. Sorry, didn't read all the comments from the beginning (

19.03.2014 23:44, Sergei Kotov:

Wrong. Eddy is right, this is berbera.

19.03.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

19.03.2014 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

19.03.2014 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acherontia styx too (Westwood, 1847): http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/a_sty.htm
Next morning I'll move both if no objections.
This is what Acherontia lachesis looks like: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/a_lac.htm
Just uploaded it :)

19.03.2014 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I deem this is Acherontia styx: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/a_sty.htm

19.03.2014 23:29, Sergei Kotov:

It is not brunnea. More like a butterfly from the group rubi / florida.

19.03.2014 19:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, this might be Phiaris palustrana, you've got another pic of this species from there, just the specimen is brighter. I'll check now a bit more and move. Also Phiaris palustrana is to be sorted out, there are photos of three species :)

19.03.2014 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phiaris palustrana / Vitaly Gumenuk Celypha rivulana / Andrey Ponomarev.

19.03.2014 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phiaris palustrana / Vitaly Gumenuk Celypha rivulana / Andrey Ponomarev.

19.03.2014 18:49, Andrey Ponomarev:

Alexandr, I know it's not that species, so it's in tentatively identified then, I put it long time ago on the German website, here is it archived:
http://lepiforum.de/forum2010.pl?md=read;id=39279
I checked there Celypha flavipalpana and Celypha cespitana, not sure though it's something of those two.

19.03.2014 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Stericta atribasalis Warren, 1895 is something different, the author is other. :)

19.03.2014 16:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agonopterix propinquella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.03.2014 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agonopterix propinquella / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.03.2014 16:13, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, I was checking atribasalis, but in Stericta gender, it's everywhere there. Didn't find decent pics) Had no doubt with jpmoth) However the main is that the thing was finally found) Flew from Primorye) Synev says it's out in Primorye.

19.03.2014 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, this moth is mentioned (pic) in the Key to the insects of the Far East of the USSR (vol. 5. p. 2. page 427, ill. 247(1). If it's there but no species name should check the original source, I spotted this by accident checking Latin names which you found. Got confused with the description year Stericta flavopuncta Inoue & Sasaki, 1995, what was before? So far relying on Synev as for Far East.

19.03.2014 15:55, Irina Nikulina:

It would have carried aAgonopterix propinquella(cm. Comment to # 24196), but with somewhat less certainty). Of the 20 species of the revised confuse some images related speciesAgonopterix laterellahttp://pathpiva.wifeo.com /agonopterix-laterella.php

19.03.2014 15:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lepidogma atribasalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.03.2014 15:45, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, I kept checking again and again this pic and neighbour #24196 so I looked thoroughly through all 21 Agonopterix of the Central region) Didn't find photos of only one, melancholica. Totally agree mine are not arenella. Nearly sure this is Agonopterix propinquella http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/a/agonopterix_propinquella.html
http://gzurka.narod.ru/OECOPHORIDAE/Agonopterix_propinquella.htm

19.03.2014 15:16, Irina Nikulina:

Quite interesting found! I met this species on Japanese website, Stericta flavopuncta http://www.jpmoth.org/Pyralidae/Epipaschiinae/Stericta_flavopuncta.html. There is no Stericta in Russia according to Synev. Neither found here any species of Stericta gender (nor in Epipaschiinae, some synonyms maybe?..) Nevertherless there is actually such moth in Russia, need to clear it up)

19.03.2014 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha flavipalpana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.03.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Московская обл.,Орехово-Зуевский р-н,пос.Тополтный. Московская обл.,Орехово-Зуевский р-н,пос.Тополиный..

19.03.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

19.03.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then I came across a very good site for America: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/indexos.htm There's a lot of information very useful for forage plants, distribution, etc. I do not know how to drive to the database (Peter, look vbey, please: it is necessary. This is a page with an example from this site: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/xbelti.htm

19.03.2014 2:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looks quite similar, very :)

19.03.2014 2:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, got serious doubts on this ID, did Vlad see these pics? What's his thought? The specimen also has red head, this one is not Celypha rurestrana,

19.03.2014 2:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, got serious doubts on this ID, did Vlad see these pics? What's his thought? The specimen also has red head, this is not Celypha rurestrana but rather dark Celypha flavipalpana or Celypha cespitana

19.03.2014 0:57, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha flavipalpana perhaps? This species is distributed in Primorye and quite common.

19.03.2014 0:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes chiron / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.03.2014 0:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Unfortunately I have not heard about so that you can restore the natural color. It is not feasible in my opinion.

18.03.2014 23:36, Igor Ivannikov:

This hawk I had to take pictures to rabote.Krome cardboard box for the background is nothing at hand is not the future I will consider okazalos.V. Basil, is it possible than ever to restore the green color of this butterfly? And when soaking water droplets and wings browned.

18.03.2014 23:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Advise on the underside to remove thick, Whatman paper papered with foam and no arms and no tie is not necessary to remove the pin. It is only necessary to pierce a hole in the foam at the head of a pin. All my underside removed by this method. The material just as well stay in one piece with careful handling.

18.03.2014 22:53, Igor Ivannikov:

Thank you Vasily for determining the species.

18.03.2014 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia atlites / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.03.2014 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia atlites / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.03.2014 18:36, Peter Khramov:

I will make it to be automatic without any dogs in the list of such problem is. But this is after at least the first version of the program will be ready for collection, ie, After this week.

18.03.2014 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr is right, common name Oleander Hawk-moth Or Army Green Moth should be removed. The real oleander is Daphnis nerii as well as the whole gender, imho :)

18.03.2014 18:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexandr, this might have been commented on the species description page, not here to the photo.

18.03.2014 18:01, Alex Dumchus:

Guys, who named this hawkmoth Oleander Hawk-moth Or Army Green Moth??? Xylophanes chiron. Check the taxonomy.

18.03.2014 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put them long ago on molbiol.ru with hope Roman would help, anyway he lost somewhere. Here you came :) Thanks.
I've got also 4 Asian, huge and all greasy as usual..... (
I'll clean them up (yet haven't got to it) and put here :)

18.03.2014 16:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Which comment? Vasily, cossidae could be checked by Roman Yakovlev, he'll help.

18.03.2014 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.03.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Erebus crepuscularis / Imago / Anna Gerasimova Erebus ephesperis / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.03.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved though my comment wasn't submitted.

18.03.2014 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dynamine aerata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.03.2014 14:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dynamine aerata

18.03.2014 14:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zeuzera caudata

18.03.2014 14:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is imho Erebus ephesperis

18.03.2014 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I know :) It Xylophanes chiron nechus (Cramer, [1777]).
But these human body parts carry a reluctance even :) Let the author to apologize. And we are all here for the line of people criticize ......
This might expose himself soon and also from French Guiana

18.03.2014 12:27, :

Basil is the same roisterer as pictured http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/28016

18.03.2014 11:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phrixolepia sericea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.03.2014 11:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kitanola uncula / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.03.2014 9:05, Zhanna Saripova: This species is identified correctly.

18.03.2014 3:37, Irina Nikulina:

Phrixolepia sericea

18.03.2014 3:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whose underside? Why is the hand?
The site has the ability to link a photo to the group. For example: underside / top.
And let's remove the collectors' items, without any superfluous detail: human hands / feet, and the like? So in fact it would be better in my opinion :)

18.03.2014 3:31, Irina Nikulina:

Kitanola uncula

18.03.2014 3:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes chiron / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.03.2014 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cydia pomonella / Tentatively identified / Zoran Bozovic Cydia fagiglandana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2014 15:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Sentence.
Make the opportunity to insert a link to a photo from the gallery, such as phone number, which is clearly visible in the address of the photo.
It can be done according to the "double dog."

17.03.2014 14:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atrophaneura alcinous / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

17.03.2014 14:44, Yuri Semejkin:

A copy of the previous successfully grown pupae http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27863. What I want to say? In some literature states that to maintain the viability of these dolls, you must have snow cover to pupa not peremёrzli (snow on the pupae considered saves them from death).But the nature of the observed pupa, in some cases, well, no, can not be bundled snow .. For example pupae which reference is made, it is clear that the pupa altsinoya quite manage without snow covered and still survive.

17.03.2014 14:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Psammotis pulveralis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2014 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Checked all Anacampsis of 37th region and this one didn't come out :)

17.03.2014 12:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis solemnella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.03.2014 12:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotodonta leucodera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2014 12:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotodonta leucodera / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2014 11:59, Irina Nikulina:

Anacampsis solemnella

17.03.2014 11:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2014 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Diachrysia stenochrysis / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Diachrysia zosimi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.03.2014 2:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Psammotis pulveralis / Confidently identified / Tatyana Gordeeva.

16.03.2014 18:51, Alexander Korovin: This species is identified correctly.

16.03.2014 8:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea algea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.03.2014 8:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea algea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.03.2014 8:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can see nothing more similar than this http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30280010.html. So moving.
Anyway open to any corrections as they're rather tough :)

16.03.2014 1:12, Peter Khramov:

I corrected chudesatee miracles, and now all the figures are the same. Sometimes, it may be that the gallery is written about illustrated more species than the homepage. This means that foty loaded and as illustrations are not yet checked. The situation is working, I constantly monitor and illustrate a new species.If, however, still some inconsistencies, it's a bug, and ask him to signal.

16.03.2014 0:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

According to http://eol.org/pages/30563056/overview Ziridava xylinaria kanshireiensis Prout 1958 is a Ziridava xylinaria subspecies which is catalogued. However somewhere Ziridava kanshireiensis Prout 1958 is described as an individual species. Move to Z. xylinaria?

15.03.2014 23:00, Peter Khramov:

All cleaned up too much, you can now add.

15.03.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Barsine went to synonyms.

15.03.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.03.2014 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.03.2014 22:31, Irina Nikulina:

Excuse me, did not look that female) did not consider sexual dimorphism species. I take it back

15.03.2014 22:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Barsine striata Miltochrista striata.

15.03.2014 22:13, Irina Nikulina:

Not ready to name the species, but this is not Archips podana.

15.03.2014 22:03, Irina Nikulina:

No, it's not dumetana. Still inclined toChoristoneura diversanaDuring this time looked all kinds of DV-Choristoneura, doubts have arisen about the only close to diversana type -Choristoneura evanidana

15.03.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, how to end the rule base MESSAGE. There is already a need to introduce taxa.

15.03.2014 20:38, Irina Nikulina:

Tentatively IDed as Hypomecis punctinalis which has such discal spots, clearly seen in many pics http://britishlepidoptera.weebly.com/268-hypomecis-punctinalis-pale-oak-beauty.html or http://www.papillon-poitou-charentes.org/Hypomecis-punctinalis-Scopoli-1763,17580.html. The specimen is quite ragged though, didn't get to write.

15.03.2014 20:20, Peter Khramov:

For the exchange is also very cool and suitable thing. Then just wait until all potestit and open to the public has appreciated, you need it or not.

15.03.2014 20:19, Peter Khramov:

Anna, thank you very much for your kind words, it is very nice to hear: -)

15.03.2014 19:57, Irina Nikulina:

Yeah, agree, was going to move the comment here and forgot)

15.03.2014 19:49, Irina Nikulina:

Ziridava kanshireiensis Prout 1958. http://gaga.biodiv.tw/new23/9204/017.htm No such species here though

15.03.2014 19:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 19:01, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 19:00, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 18:58, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Seems same as #27664, P. pulveralis (Hübner, 1796) =orientalis Munroe & Mutuura, 1968

15.03.2014 16:44, Anna Gerasimova:

Peter, thank you for such a great site and for the opportunity to participate in it!
In general, it is you and lepidoptera.ru inspired me to study butterflies. Now every walk in the woods for me was full of passion for hunting illustrations))))

15.03.2014 16:03, Tatyana Gordeeva:

At first sight Hypomecis, yet the patter is poor and discal spots are nearly annuloid as ones of Gnophini...... Anyone say anything else?

15.03.2014 15:59, Alex Dumchus:

Chavoyto's complicated, I am only interested in sharing, because accumulated a lot of material, mostly -tropiki

15.03.2014 15:53, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Thank you for your educational program :-)

15.03.2014 15:15, Peter Khramov:

According traps - infa on terms to be next week. But ready-made options, there is a feeling there will be no sooner than a month.

15.03.2014 15:11, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, the meaning of a program is described in the first post. If this thing for you interesting - you have to just try to use it the next week and tell you what ponra that not ponra that was not enough, some bugs were found, etc.And if there is understanding, what for this section at all is required, do not worry - just need to wait for an open version, and there are already concrete examples all will be clear.
About traps Now unsubscribe in the subject.

15.03.2014 15:08, Peter Khramov:

People new taxa until the plant, should be something in the database to correct.

15.03.2014 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Psammotis pulveralis / Vitaly Gumenuk Pechipogo strigilata / Irina Nikulina.

15.03.2014 14:41, Alex Dumchus:

And by the way, what about the traps? You did not answer.

15.03.2014 14:40, Alex Dumchus:

Peter obyasnite- is necessary for testing. I do not understand anything. In any case, my foty except prirodnyh- from my collection. And a lot of other species that do not Fota, not to repeat Dmitry and others ph tropics.

15.03.2014 14:36, Irina Nikulina:

Please check this, I don't think this is Psammotis, rather some Herminiinae got here (and as well illustrated the species). Most likely Pechipogo strigilata, the specimen is quite ragged though, I may be wrong.

15.03.2014 14:34, Irina Nikulina:

Sorry, forgot to put @( Psammotis orientalis or Psammotis pulveralis

15.03.2014 14:32, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps, Psammotis orientalis, considering geography. However, the network is almost no photos orientalis, only one on flickr (e) there was not very clear http://www.flickr.com/photos/8706930@N08/5992421693/. At the same time in the RFE and pulveralis lives. And in the article A. Streltsov, VV. Dubatolov, AM Long "New records of Lepidoptera in Bolshekhekhtsirsky ognёvkoobraznyh Reserve (env.Khabarovsk) in 2008-11gg "reads as follows:" Rhode Psammotis Hübner, [1825] considered in detail in his review of E. and A. Munro Mutuura [Munroe, Mutuura, 1968], where they described a new species of this genus, including P. orientalis Munroe & Mutuura, 1968 from Japan.Symptoms, which the authors identify this species of minor importance, unobtrusive and almost completely overlap intraspecific variation (which in this group is very high). This was confirmed by the study of material from the west and east of the Palearctic, which also showed a slight difference. Therefore, we believe P. pulveralis (Hübner, 1796) = orientalis Munroe & Mutuura, 1968, syn.nov »
So, probably, and you can put Psammotis pulveralis)

15.03.2014 12:39, Peter Khramov:

Tatiana, so the search for the right above all always find: -) http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/18884.

15.03.2014 9:49, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 9:48, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 9:46, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 9:42, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 9:38, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Excuse me, I did not find the kind of Xerodes page classification moths (Ennominae). Already, at least three photos X.albonotaria, a kind yet.

15.03.2014 9:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Found that too, didn't get to write, lack of info in the guide and the pattern doesn't give a clue... also no underside...

15.03.2014 9:25, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 9:25, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 9:22, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 9:20, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 9:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2014 7:18, Shamil Murtazin:

I looked at the "Butterflies of the Far East. The determinant" (Kurentsov AI)
It says the following: common except Trans-Baikal, Amur and Primorye, another southern Sakhalin, which shows konumensis Mats.Izvestna subspecies of the northern part of the Korean Peninsula and Manchuria.In the Far East it is very common from late June until the second decade of July in lowland deciduous and mixed forests.
Plus it is seen quite rare for a yellow checkered semicircular spot on the middle of the rear wing. In the photo we have, but there is: http://www.eurobutterflies.com/species_pages/intermedia.htm

15.03.2014 7:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

14.03.2014 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only know this is from Borneo

14.03.2014 23:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where is this specimen from? Any label?

14.03.2014 22:41, Irina Nikulina:

Hypomecis phantomaria maybe (Synev)? It's called Phthonosema phantomaria on http://www.boldsystems.org, only one pic with a note this is the only specimen from Russia http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=398790 (Phthonosema also on > szmn.sbras.ru)

14.03.2014 22:22, Irina Nikulina:

Indeed, it seems. Only now take a look at the spread - Europe. For the Russian Federation there is only SinevEuphydryas ichnea, and intermedia given as a synonym for it. And distribution for ichnea quite another 37 regions of presence.

14.03.2014 21:26, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Thanks for the offer! However, please note that the species diversity of moths only the Amur region, compared to our arid transbaikalian fauna (about 300 species) increases, at least in half. Yes the photos without genitals ...In general, in order to avoid discrepancies, comment on, if anything, in my opinion, unique (like moth Jacobson, who really bent sash (compared to Gold), and the eastern boundary of its range reaches of the Amur [Vasiliev, Epova, 1987].

14.03.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glyphodes rubrocinctalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.03.2014 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glyphodes rubrocinctalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

14.03.2014 19:41, Lev Bely:

Johan, thanks for your comment! Fixed.

14.03.2014 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here better first to ungroup these couples:) then get to the very species.

14.03.2014 16:29, Irina Nikulina:

Cucullia also got here somehow) Besides this is not argyrognomon but the same Plebejus argus, I reckon

14.03.2014 16:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tatiana, a big request to see moths Vladimir beans, there are some uncertain bution and assumptions. You Amur fauna closer :) I would like to hear your yes, no, maybe . :)

14.03.2014 15:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well no one knows it but flickr which can't be deemed as a proper source, of course. Seems there the species name was signed just randomly (

14.03.2014 15:41, Peter Khramov:

For the test and microscopic enough: -) How will all ready - I will unsubscribe in the mail or the phone stopped ringing.

14.03.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The recipe is simple. It is necessary to highlight several fluorescent lamps. Using energy-saving "SLR" cold, white light within a quantity of 3 pcs. from different points (in the corners of an equilateral triangle, of which the lamp and the object in the middle). Well, then I edit accordingly (Photoshop, ACDsee, etc.) :) Better, of course highlight the circle, but as long as I do not have in stock the lamp ring type. Plans similar: http://www.grandway.ru/lamp/day_krug.html short, continuous experimentation :)

14.03.2014 15:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Test ready collection of microscopic.

14.03.2014 15:23, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. Are there any pitfalls? I want to order: there is light, etc., but no traps will not bother.

14.03.2014 15:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Euphydryas intermedia?

14.03.2014 14:48, Peter Khramov:

The next week begin closed beta system, and then, after bringing it to mind (or if the test results all at once would be OK), we deduce the open swimming for everyone. For a full operational test and need a few more people participating.Who has the desire / opportunity potestit on their collections (or rather, their fragments) - write to me in the mail, or in this topic.

14.03.2014 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Such taxonomic conclusion seems most proper. Let's leave the gender by Synev, till the next catalogue issue. :)

14.03.2014 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Orgyia recens Cifuna locuples.

14.03.2014 13:31, Irina Nikulina:

Excuse me, hurried) Of course, not recens. This Far MothsCifuna locuplesshoot such bet. In the Russian Far East is represented by a subspecies Cifuna locuples confusa (Bremer, 1861). That there was no doubt - http://www.jpmoth.org/Lymantriidae/Cifuna_locuples_confusa.html
http://chigaku.ed.gifu-u.ac.jp/chigakuhp/html/kyo/seibutsu/doubutsu/06chou/ga/youchu/mamedoku/index.html

14.03.2014 10:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Vasily, taxapad neither knows that... the local database ends with 2012 April 26th...

14.03.2014 9:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, you have virtually shadowless photos.
Maybe you should share the recipe? It seems that part of the local photographers have taken advantage of your scheme. =)

14.03.2014 0:17, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Thank you for the correction, and the detailed answer!

13.03.2014 23:43, Peter Khramov:

In general, the grit, it says not grown together, but he asked to remove foty from the site, and must remove that look.

13.03.2014 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrausta clausalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.03.2014 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wait another opinion. It's hard to make an unambiguous decision on such "mixed" picture :)

13.03.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea frithi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.03.2014 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Alexander. I put perhaps point :)

13.03.2014 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Doleschallia bisaltide / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.03.2014 18:17, Alex Dumchus:

I do not care:)

13.03.2014 18:14, Alex Dumchus:

She - Antheraea frithi, I have a variation from the sandy-yellow to brick-red flowers

13.03.2014 18:11, Alex Dumchus:

Doleschallia bisaltide

13.03.2014 18:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where is preferable to carry?

13.03.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Prepona laertes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.03.2014 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas februa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

13.03.2014 18:02, Alex Dumchus:

Anteos maerula and Phoebis sennae

13.03.2014 17:58, Alex Dumchus:

Prepona laertes

13.03.2014 17:41, Alex Dumchus:

Hamadryas februa

13.03.2014 15:10, Peter Khramov:

Tatiana, the error corrected. In the future, will be able to edit their comments for an hour or half an hour after the load, but this is not.
For questions:
1. If the article is not published, you can make the data marked "Private Message". Link for data entry - the top right of each page of the form.If there are any doubts, first add a little bit of information, we will check and then if everything is OK, you can image and likeness has to continue.
2. It is claimed. In the frames of present technical capabilities of such materials can be published in a section or blog. Let's sleep at the mail with details of how and what.
3.Regarding PDFiKo, ideally it would be good just to refer to a global library where this infa there, but if there is no disk imaging, it is necessary to discuss individually on articles - whose, when written, etc. Ie technically can be repaired, the question of necessity, and the availability of such rights.
Ether does not clog up, it is always better to ask than to keep silent.

13.03.2014 13:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, thank you. Now the works of the already replaced :) Now the soul of calm in this regard. And new types of loading at the same time :)

13.03.2014 13:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. This, I pulled it from admin to light just to lay there :)

13.03.2014 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Not identified.

13.03.2014 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well I stuffed: just thought that would be translated quickly. And that could not be on the forum just write someone a photo? We must and we understand the Serbian name it :)

13.03.2014 11:47, Peter Khramov:

ZY Basil, what for you and stuffed in a box with a copy of the English version of his commentary of the Russian text and posted the whole thing? It is now to Vaughn as elegant looks http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27947.

13.03.2014 11:46, Peter Khramov:

The author says that the admin forum post it under his own name since there were certain difficulties, not to ship under his. Concerning the second foty, a link to which I laid out, it is not his and is not written anywhere that it, so there is the case of all the rules. As for the first, it is necessary to write to ask confirmation, but it did not grit in English. Hmm.

13.03.2014 11:38, Peter Khramov:

It happens when the picture is the same.

13.03.2014 10:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Wow, leaf :)

13.03.2014 6:35, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Thank you, did not want to advertise Zinovsky errors in the overall theme, as a result of his hung. Now there is "Prou" instead of "Please" and abracadabra with a bold (a problem with the keyboard, coffee flooded). Yes I hurried, not reread. Now it does not rectify the spelling?
In the case of several questions:
1.How to make additional information on the form (eg, bionomics). Until this is done, but such data are accumulated as you work with the types and growing and to the papers sometimes do not reach. Or you include only published data?
2. For some types casually appear pocherkushki popular character (the history of the study of the form, and so on.).They are in demand?
3. It is possible and necessary to attach information pdf article or a facsimile of it, if any (for example, the first description).
Sorry unsophisticated party if "" pollute air "and all this somewhere already stated.

13.03.2014 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.03.2014 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

13.03.2014 4:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The main "trick" that have been laid out on said butterfly resources under a different authorship snapshot same position of the legs and antennae :) Really it happens in nature?

13.03.2014 1:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cool.

13.03.2014 1:31, Peter Khramov:

Yeah. But it's ... http://www.naturefg.com/pages/c-animals/rebelia.htm

13.03.2014 0:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hydraecia micacea / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.03.2014 0:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://www.lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=78754
but there is still a caterpillar-shaped case, I think the explanation is satisfactory. :) This is not plagiarism.

12.03.2014 23:54, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male.

12.03.2014 23:54, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male.

12.03.2014 21:55, Peter Khramov:

It is written that the corpse. However, shoot as netrupik - it is a clean sport.

12.03.2014 21:54, Peter Khramov:

Who says what?

12.03.2014 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Why can not catch anywhere? Surely foreign lawmakers such as oak but sycophants, like ours? Well, that is Especially, there are some exotic countries, but normlano some people just like to focus specially protected species, and Pieris rapae, unlike the Russian Federation, still catching Mona, do not?

12.03.2014 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

12.03.2014 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Zoran posted today, waiting for clarification.

12.03.2014 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Well, to this, by itself, it is impossible not to join!)

12.03.2014 21:43, Peter Khramov:

Tatiana, thanks for the comment to Lithostege onkhoica and Lithostege onochoica, corrected. The only things desirable to write in the comments to the form so you can see the history and reasons for corrections. Now I wrote the comment is there to correct, just to the people was clear.

12.03.2014 21:38, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you'll fly LC, try, now it should be the norm. Infu also suffered in your geography.
Alexander will fly search now everything is OK.
I apologize for the long brake in time ooh and ah, now here is only slowly picks.

12.03.2014 21:35, Peter Khramov:

If you used the website search with the "Search" button instead of autosuggestion, the results could include subspecies names which would be sort of wrong with links to nowhere. Now that's fixed and subspecies names are as proper as species names and those links go to where they should actually go, or on pages of the parent species.
However, I'd like to say again that the search autosuggestion works faster and does develop, and in most cases will be handier as compared to the common "Search" button, yet the latter has its pros, for one, you may share link to search results, also the usual search goes better when you get load of results.

12.03.2014 20:37, Johan Ingles-Le Nobel:

Hello! Fyi I'm actually Dutch :).

12.03.2014 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, here I nakosyachil when infu added: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/89612
It must be from the "flight of time" to remove everything that's written in the section "Distribution" Sorry, I did not go the Old hammered (But kind illustrated :)

12.03.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.03.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.03.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

12.03.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is my opinion.

12.03.2014 17:41, Alex Dumchus:

Rather Phoebis sennae

12.03.2014 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I would like to express my gratitude to the Irina Nikulina for the wonderful photos of butterflies in nature and huge, painstaking work to identify species from the Russian Far East.
Irina , thank you very much! Keep it up :)

12.03.2014 0:36, Irina Nikulina:

The same photo (but without turning and processing background) I met online nahuby.sk http://www.nahuby.sk/obrazok_detail.php?obrazok_id=383349
(author of the image Boženka Hricová). There's this butterfly is defined as Rebelia herrichiella. I would like to clarify the situation ..

12.03.2014 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. The genus name (if known only genus) propose to write in the "Additional information / remarks. For example, the instance output from the pupa or Determination was carried out on a photo or any other additional information" In this case, the writing will be seen not only Moderators, but all users of the site.

11.03.2014 23:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zoran, charging indeterminate species is not necessary to write only one generic name in the name field of the form. It is written in the field of the form Rebela Sp. : this should not be, and this field should be left blank. Due to the non-compliance of the problems with the moderation of the photo.

11.03.2014 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Female Glyphodes bivitralis / Confidently identified / Imago / Irina Nikulina.

11.03.2014 23:34, Irina Nikulina:

Glyphodes bivitralis

11.03.2014 22:39, Shamil Murtazin:

unusual caterpillar ...

11.03.2014 20:32, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Exuvia kind Moth Lymantria, likely neparnik ...

11.03.2014 20:29, Alex Dumchus:

Criticism has considered. There seems to be, when processing photos looked fine, but now I see myself.

11.03.2014 19:56, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, if not a secret, but why cut corners?

11.03.2014 19:53, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Probably Orgya postica (Walker, 1855): 4 yellow brush, two pair of lateral beams of light, red head, arms, and the first segment of the dorsal stripe + iron on the penultimate segment, and so forth. Kind comes to Indonesia and New Guinea.

11.03.2014 19:32, Tatyana Gordeeva:

In appearance - an ordinary neparnik (Lymantria dispar), but not the last age. In Thailand, this species is marked.

11.03.2014 16:33, Alex Dumchus:

As similar to P.rumanzowia!

11.03.2014 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithostege palaestinensis / Alexandr Zhakov Lithostege griseata / Ozgur Kocak.

11.03.2014 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tatiana, I realized all of the typos Catalog Sineva on this site, are inherent and as revealing gradually correct them. :)

11.03.2014 14:49, Tatyana Gordeeva:

I beg your pardon, recent comments to photos to make mistakes, I will be grateful if you can fix it ...

11.03.2014 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you fix the specific name, can only Peter, on the stand to this page and wait for the correction.

11.03.2014 14:43, Tatyana Gordeeva:

it Lithostege on oc hoica (details in the official thread)

11.03.2014 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithostege onkhoica.

11.03.2014 14:39, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Lithostege onochoica

11.03.2014 14:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

The view is not specified. Tatiana, I know ,. you know that in the view of. :) Must be specified.

11.03.2014 14:31, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Good day! I have a favour! Please correct the name of the moth Lithostege onkhoica on Lithostege onochoica, it really is. The fact that the ZIN-ovskom directory error. This species was named by us under the name of settlement Onohoy (where the holotype described) and in Latin it is reflected as a onochoica. In support can make pdf article with the original description (if necessary).

10.03.2014 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

10.03.2014 17:32, Alex Dumchus:

There are no subspecies T. trouana, while Trogonoptera brookiana following:
ssp. albescens Rothschild, 1895
ssp. mollumar D'Abrera, Doggett & Parker, 1976
ssp. trogon Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1860
ssp. noname, loc South Sumatra, Mt Dempo
ssp. jikoi Kobayashi, 1986
ssp. akikoae Morita, 1994
ssp. mariae Neukirchen, 1993
ssp. toshikii Kobayashi, 1991
ssp. cardinaali Haugum & Low, 1982
ssp. natunensis Rothschild, 1908
ssp. brookiana Wallace, 1855
ssp. haugumei Parrott, 1991
in the collections of the most frequent trogon and brookiana

10.03.2014 17:10, Peter Khramov:

If the underside needs to subspecies, then you can leave, if not - you can not leave. Who do we have on the subspecies?

10.03.2014 16:05, Alex Dumchus:

Hell, I did them has caught on recently straightened sfotayu

10.03.2014 15:58, Alex Dumchus:

Very beautiful female aberration P.memnon. Nothing else comes to mind

10.03.2014 15:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.03.2014 15:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.03.2014 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

10.03.2014 15:27, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

10.03.2014 15:27, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

10.03.2014 15:27, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, for God's sake, I will give you and the underside of males and females. Type something banal and easily defined. That did not bother to give. They are actually only two species in one genus, easily distinguishable!

10.03.2014 15:26, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

10.03.2014 15:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well razve SO underside removed? (Keep the question of Alexander.

10.03.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rothschildia hesperus / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus.

10.03.2014 15:21, Peter Khramov:

Photography, of course, leaves much to be, but as I understand it, the point is that there was at least some ispod ssp. trogon.

10.03.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, this too is a subspecies: Rothschildia aurota speculifera (Walker, 1855) Brazil , Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina. But I put in R. hesperus (in aurota himself strongly doubt).

10.03.2014 15:12, Alex Dumchus:

Why do I need a picture quite common in the collections of butterflies ???

10.03.2014 15:08, Alex Dumchus:

I would say that this is R. hesperus. It is the same red, and is found in Brazil. One of these days I will give my photos from the collection - one face.

10.03.2014 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrochola vulpecula / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.03.2014 13:58, Irina Nikulina:

Agrochola vulpecula

10.03.2014 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Niphonyx segregata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.03.2014 12:19, Irina Nikulina:

Niphonyx segregata

10.03.2014 1:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander! I fished in Egypt, Tunisia, Israel, Jordan. You need to go there in February and March. In the UAE, you need to fall in December. And you will be happy. Moths and butterflies in the desert dzhunglyah- different categories. I always fly from Moscow, although it 400 kilometers from me.

10.03.2014 0:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea cinxia / Alexsandr Martukov Melitaea phoebe / Sergei Kotov.

10.03.2014 0:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melitaea cinxia / Alexsandr Martukov Melitaea phoebe / Sergei Kotov.

10.03.2014 0:13, Alexsandr Martukov:

I agree that it is more Melitaea phoebe. Do yourself look under high magnification, and "launched" a little underside of the second butterfly ... on the orange spots sling dark orange, not black!) It turns out that phoebe.

10.03.2014 0:13, Alexsandr Martukov:

I agree that it is more Melitaea phoebe. Do yourself look under high magnification, and "launched" a little underside of the second butterfly ... on the orange spots sling dark orange, not black!) It turns out that phoebe.

09.03.2014 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta catocaloida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.03.2014 19:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, a good point! I really tried! Here even almost got =)
This is one of the first straightened me butterflies. The first was a swallowtail, but here it is not - it and so much)))
It is a pity that Titania eaten. I found it quite by accident doll.

09.03.2014 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.03.2014 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, a little advice for the future raspravke rear edge of the front wing must be perpendicular to the abdomen. This is one of the basic rules: truth is not always stick to it myself :)

09.03.2014 19:30, Shamil Murtazin:

That's good that immediately after drying photographed - I got to the carpet beetle :)
Ieh ... well at least not a few "years" ate ...

09.03.2014 19:14, Sergei Kotov:

I'll say. Overal appearance says more for Melitaea phoebe. Though the angles here (underside hardly seen) make it hard to conclude anything on what's this, Melitaea phoebe or dark M. cinxia. If leave this in M. cinxia, then in tentatively identified.

09.03.2014 19:14, Sergei Kotov:

I'll say. Overal appearance says more for Melitaea phoebe. Though the angles here (underside hardly seen) make it hard to conclude anything on what's this, Melitaea phoebe or dark M. cinxia. If leave this in M. cinxia, then in tentatively identified.

09.03.2014 14:14, Peter Khramov:

I join in the congratulations. Female sex on our website virtually Red is rare, and therefore particularly valuable and should be protected.

09.03.2014 5:15, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Many thanks! It's nice to get such good and such a nice greeting card! Counter-congratulation - With the beginning of spring! - Time interesting finds and new discoveries! All of peace, harmony and warmth!

08.03.2014 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Alexsandr Martukov.

08.03.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Alexsandr Martukov Sergei Kotov.

08.03.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apatura iris / Alexsandr Martukov Apatura ilia / Sergei Kotov.

08.03.2014 20:40, Alexsandr Martukov:

Weeeeel... Seems this does have "eye" on its forewing! I'll add now an only pic with that. Sergey Kotov is right again!)

08.03.2014 20:18, Alexsandr Martukov:

Most of all - it is! Quite often L. populi in 2012. I met on the dry (artificial) between the primer dd. Chernev and Tomasheva Orel settlement going on Indigenous south bank of the river. Road tight enough frames aspen. Poplar lentochniki examined for some reason the road sections with protruding gravel!)

08.03.2014 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.03.2014 20:10, Alexsandr Martukov:

Great! Many gems and freshies yet stocked and unpacked!)

08.03.2014 14:50, Anna Gerasimova:

Thank you! We will try to please you, and even the new beautiful butterflies)))

08.03.2014 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Should ask Alexandr for another angle of this specimen (topside), here's unclear whether this has an "eye" spot or not. If does, then it's ilia, otherwise iris. Hard to make a correct ID with such angle.

08.03.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis adippe / Alexsandr Martukov Argynnis aglaja / Eugene Karolinskiy.

08.03.2014 7:00, Roger Dolorosa: This species is identified correctly.

08.03.2014 6:05, Sergei Kotov:

aglaja

08.03.2014 6:04, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

08.03.2014 2:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

aglaja

08.03.2014 0:43, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you !!) From such a warm congratulations and my heart warmed up!

08.03.2014 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I want to congratulate the authors of the excellent site with this wonderful holiday of March 8 !!!
I wish you happiness, love, kindness, and all the best that you can only wish. Always bright, warm and sunny mood to you, dear women! And that my heart was always all so well in this beautiful, spring holiday :)

07.03.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the picture I think the female (could be wrong). On personal observations from L. populi just females rarely leave the trees. While males are usually at the bottom and can be taken directly from the moist soil of forest roads. Can you not?

07.03.2014 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In L. populi usually does not come down from the trees females and males can be taken directly from the ground (very much like to sit on the dirt). It's just from personal observation. I can not understand the picture the female or male?

07.03.2014 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, on Tuesday, on Tuesday. Though it is necessary: ​​that I did not confused. By the way, today again, "wagon" exotics brought and will spread gradually. Interesting: 1000 will bring a lux or not? :)

07.03.2014 17:34, Sergei Kotov:

Wrong, this is Apatura ilia instead

07.03.2014 11:55, Peter Khramov:

Wow, Achtung any ... In general, only on Tuesday at the earliest, probably something I can fix. Over time, the horror, have time only the most superficial and fast vesch blind that do not require thinking.

07.03.2014 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gazoryctra ganna / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.03.2014 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Month indeed :) Agree with Irina, moving to ganna. Now no doubt.

07.03.2014 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.03.2014 22:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rothschildia aurota ? Nothing else of them did I like. What will the folks say?

06.03.2014 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rothschildia jacobaeae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.03.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Arsenura orbignyana.

06.03.2014 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.03.2014 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 21:33, Alexsandr Martukov:

In any case, thank you!) I have butterflies rented only three years. Dia in the "underside" I did not come across as well as in private collections gained a new copy!)

06.03.2014 21:17, Alexsandr Martukov:

Not so straightforward ... The region from west to east stretches over 650 kilometers ... We were influenced by the Urals, and Babaevo - Baltic! Not Hilo, yes!
Interestingly, the list Sineva - Maturna, Adippa, Niobe, Admiral absent from us, but in fact they are! Pafiya should be on the list, but we have not yet come across!

06.03.2014 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

06.03.2014 15:45, Sergei Kotov:

Boloria dia in the Vologda region has unambiguously.

06.03.2014 15:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander sent to the mailbox specified in the profile.

06.03.2014 15:21, Alexsandr Martukov:

Thank you! It is necessary to list! Wait understand "field trips" over the last two seasons!)

06.03.2014 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

According to the list Sinev had to check. If it is not: I can send :)

06.03.2014 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macaria liturata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.03.2014 14:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well..... let it be then :)

06.03.2014 14:44, Alexsandr Martukov:

Once I Diu rejected and did not check, I thought in our region is not found ...

06.03.2014 14:43, Irina Nikulina:

You got a bit earlier) I wanted to say, this is it.

06.03.2014 14:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xerodes albonotaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.03.2014 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sure Macaria at least.

06.03.2014 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I deem Macaria liturata

06.03.2014 14:26, Irina Nikulina:

Xerodes albonotaria

06.03.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

06.03.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

06.03.2014 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

06.03.2014 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

06.03.2014 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Boloria euphrosyne / Alexsandr Martukov Boloria dia / Sergei Kotov.

06.03.2014 13:08, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male and female

06.03.2014 13:06, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male

06.03.2014 13:04, Alexsandr Martukov:

Only some have red spots. Please compare. Trifle but pleasure. As those two white spots of Vanessa atalanta...;)

06.03.2014 13:02, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

06.03.2014 13:02, Alexsandr Martukov:

Female

06.03.2014 13:01, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male

06.03.2014 13:01, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male

06.03.2014 13:00, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male

06.03.2014 12:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male.

06.03.2014 12:59, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male

06.03.2014 12:58, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male.

06.03.2014 12:57, Alexsandr Martukov:

Male.

06.03.2014 12:54, Sergei Kotov:

Neither one nor the other. Boloria diait.

06.03.2014 12:52, Sergei Kotov:

Common female colour in this species, nothing astounding here.

06.03.2014 10:42, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. I do not swear. Just poletka Rostov significantly different from Moscow. And I try to fly 90 percent of Rostov. Therefore, where, and most importantly, when there are places out there and fly. The priority, nevertheless, is rest. A fishing combine.As for Egypt and the other Emirates, I would say that the diversity of species, they are not different in comparison with the SE Asia, and the Caribbean. Everywhere caught d.hrizipp there Belyanko and painted lady, seen in Egypt p.saharae, caught Juno. And, perhaps, everything. All the same, in my opinion, in the jungle will be interesting.

06.03.2014 1:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macaria loricaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.03.2014 0:55, Irina Nikulina:

A month passed it's been here) Now tending more to ganna (checked more details of these two species), especially considering nature specifics of the Middle Amur Lowland which has Amursk located northeast.

06.03.2014 0:38, Irina Nikulina:

Macaria loricaria

05.03.2014 23:55, Irina Nikulina:

Acronicta catocaloida
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Korea0606/80_Noctuidae/Hylonycta%20catocaloida/Hylonycta%20catocaloida.htm

05.03.2014 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea scolopacina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.03.2014 20:49, Irina Nikulina:

Apamea scolopacina

05.03.2014 19:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Moved them all to Polia bombycina similarly, can't find anything better, hope Sergey was right.

05.03.2014 19:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia bombycina / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.03.2014 19:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia bombycina / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.03.2014 19:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia bombycina / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.03.2014 19:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia bombycina / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.03.2014 4:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Zizina otis / Anna Gerasimova Pseudozizeeria maha / Eugene Karolinskiy.

05.03.2014 4:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Zizina otis / Anna Gerasimova Pseudozizeeria maha / Eugene Karolinskiy.

05.03.2014 2:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hydriomena impluviata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.03.2014 0:55, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Z. maha

05.03.2014 0:55, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Z, maha

04.03.2014 23:16, Irina Nikulina:

Hydriomena impluviata

04.03.2014 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tethea albicostata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.03.2014 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polypogon gryphalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.03.2014 20:56, Irina Nikulina:

Supposing Polypogon gryphalis

04.03.2014 19:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Zoran, many plume moths are known for their quite specific resting pose including specific wing position towards body and perch, wing fold angle and number of other elements. I can approximately say what's gender, not Emmelina anyway.

04.03.2014 19:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agriphila geniculea Pediasia contaminella.

04.03.2014 17:08, Peter Khramov:

No, the determinant, of course, fail. Ie technically nothing prevents, but to create it to no one. Here we consider just and only for color selection.Such a feature can be activated and to assist in determining the same, but more interesting might be even more opportunities for the selection of parameters and statistics for the color in different taxa and geo-locations.

04.03.2014 13:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Maybe even a form antennok (antennae)?
Peter, the determinant of the pace will :)
Basil, I think, would not mind. Although used for the native "forest plantations".

04.03.2014 13:08, Zoran Bozovic:

Sorry, I thought this is my image!

04.03.2014 12:01, Zoran Bozovic:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?
See Diagnose, to see difference between Agriphila_Geniculea and Pediasia contaminella
This should be Pediasia contaminella. *

04.03.2014 11:37, Zoran Bozovic:

'doesn't rest like this'
To my experience, all moths which come to strong light source,
my 3600 Lumens lamp, for example, change their behavior and
subsequently, the resting pose.

04.03.2014 1:18, Peter Khramov:

Yes, compared to the situation a few flowers more complicated. But here only prevent disputes, as color - initially not the most accurate indication, there are different people something different so often see different monitors show different ...In general, it seems necessary to do the same with respect to a simplified version, which will be split only at the top / underside and basic / plus additional colors for every kind of crow perelivnits. In addition, you may need to change the list of color options, which is now online sincefrequent transitions between the brown and gray, as well as between gray and black, when God knows what it referred. And also with orange question - may need otrpavlyat in red ...

03.03.2014 16:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, develops general guidelines in marking the attribute "color" to search the catalog. IMHO ...
Peter, it's pretty trivial topic. Maybe we should carry out the "color" debates for each type? ..
Because besides the main colors are rare flakes of different color, plus glimpses of ... some kind of changing colors in different lighting conditions, etc.By the way, if there is any artful recording form of wings, such as the formula for the angiosperm flowers?

03.03.2014 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Example distinguishing species Limenitis Apatura and from the school, the determinant of the Soviet "to the insects of the European part of the USSR" BN Mamaev, LN Medvedev, FN Pravdin.Moskva, Education 1976.
From clippings it can be seen that is used for these genera. Peter, what has conceived something?

03.03.2014 13:25, Irina Nikulina:

Tethea albicostata I suppose http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/72_Drepanidae/70.1_Thyatirinae/framepage%20thyatirinae.htm
Here are all Tethea within Far East

03.03.2014 2:10, Peter Khramov:

Ie that is used in the qualifiers or it would be reasonable to use them with TZ colors? For example: wing background, color stains, sling veins. Continue pliz, if anyone can. Or please poke source if somewhere it is written.

03.03.2014 1:51, Peter Khramov:

Basil, a blockage over time. During the week, I think it'll do.

03.03.2014 0:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

You wonder criticize Tunisia and Emirates. You have to know when to go and what to look for. It is the magic of the country.
Cyprus and Turkey are all great country (though the prohibition of fishing in Turkey, I have heard, and hard). Egyptian or to the north (the border with Israel), or at the very south, but also need to know when and who to look for.

02.03.2014 23:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catch can not be anywhere else. And you can catch all. Here as lucky. I prefer anywhere and never advertise. Nobody forbade me to screw in the bulb on my balcony in the hotel and all night "to drink wine." Nobody forbade me to walk in the forests, fields and meadows (if it is not a private area). But I will never say that I catch butterflies and catch them for all to see.These opuses about catching translated into English is not necessary, especially with real names.

02.03.2014 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygrammodes runicalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.03.2014 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Neat beastie. I think Taquinata tirsiana : http://www.flickr.com/photos/75374522@N06/10068091336
Have no idea where to add the species. Any thoughts on that?

02.03.2014 18:13, :

Thank you, Mr. K Unfortunately, all, as usual, to know their own skin. Well, now I'm just in these countries Rider! Do you know more countries other than the above mentioned, where as well as in Sri impossible to catch, and the country where you can fish. I think it will be useful for anyone interested.I can think of a country where there are no problems: Thailand, Vietnam, Dominican Republic, Mexico. Separately, the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia (but there's too much of a certain dovit), as well as in Cyprus.

02.03.2014 16:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trosia nigropunctigera / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.03.2014 15:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander! Never, never say that you catch butterflies! Sachek carry any children - they can catch and hide easily in any bag. The hotel in Lanka before me no dig, truth be told, it's illegal. Wear fotik always-if anything-you are photographing. I had brought from Lanka about 150 specimens of butterflies and beetles 2 mattresses.And, as I mentioned, China, Brazil and Sri Lanka- countries are not catching. There are Thailand, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia. Lovit- neperelovit.

02.03.2014 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orsotriaena medus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

02.03.2014 13:38, Alex Dumchus:

We went still in Sri., As poletku we Rostov through Bangkok was canceled. Well, no ... race as the locals! Fishnet uncover possible.Moreover, when I struck up a conversation with a guide on a trip to the rain forest, to catch butterflies, he told me the story of the last year, as a citizen of Germany put on a year of jail !!! for the fact that about 50 butterflies found in the luggage. How do you think I felt after this? Certainly I did not go.In short, bezpontovaya country contingent, as the total of & Dmitriy- but. Not for entomologists!

02.03.2014 12:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That's right.

02.03.2014 11:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tolypida amaryllis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.03.2014 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to do: Mimallonidae> Mimallonidae (Burmeister, 1878): http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/search/GenusList3.dsml?SUPERFAMIL=MIMALLONOIDEA&AUTHORqtype=starts+with&sort=GENUS&SUBTRIBEqtype=starts+with&YEARqtype=equals&GENUSqtype=starts+with&TRIBEqtype=starts+with&SUBFAMILYqtype=starts+with&FAMILYqtype=starts+with&beginIndex=0&searchPageURL=index%2edsml%3fSUPERFAMIL%3dMIMALLONOIDEA%26AUTHORqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26sort%3dGENUS%26SUBTRIBEqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26YEARqtype%3dequals%26beginIndex%3d30%26GENUSqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26TRIBEqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26SUBFAMILYqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26FAMILYqtype%3dstarts%2bwith&listPageURL=GenusList3%2edsml%3fSUPERFAMIL%3dMIMALLONOIDEA%26AUTHORqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26sort%3dGENUS%26SUBTRIBEqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26YEARqtype%3dequals%26beginIndex%3d30%26GENUSqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26TRIBEqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26SUBFAMILYqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26FAMILYqtype%3dstarts%2bwith

02.03.2014 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Orsotriaena medus too?

02.03.2014 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orsotriaena medus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

02.03.2014 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This author happens to group different things together ( Dmitry, check please the neighbour pic, seems the same as here.

02.03.2014 10:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Orsotriaena medus, why belongs to Junonia?

02.03.2014 10:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There seems to be necessary to the family Mimallonidae to open: http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=193158
This Tolypida amaryllis, (Schaus, 1896) : http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_mimallonidae.htm
Today, loans and bear :)

02.03.2014 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Should get ungrouped: these are different butterflies.
The labels say.

01.03.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Марчело, пожалуйста не забывайте указывать место съемки к каждому фото.
Это вместе с указанием даты существенно поможет в определении вида.

01.03.2014 19:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is possible that the case and not in the lamps at all, but we both had such an opinion.

01.03.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I take advantage of this opportunity to remind you about my LC. And then all the ship and ship the replacement ..... Can not?

01.03.2014 15:21, Peter Khramov:

Thank you, I'm there to another incandescent review then it also suffered, because all at once he said. About 160 vs 250 people have already said this, that in the dark without a difference, but that different teams on different lamps are - it is a very interesting. Do you mind if I'm on this thing proanonsiruyu molbiole briefly and read shtop already on the site?

01.03.2014 15:20, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, a remark seen, adjusting, but not immediately.

01.03.2014 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, yes: swallowtail we fully everywhere and with two generations.
But the other four species, leading to an average strip rare. Mnemosyne know for sure is on the south-east of Moscow kilometers 100. By the same direction, on the border with the Ryazan region. familiar guys found in 2012 and Polyxena. Apollo is in the Vladimir region. (a stable point).Podalirius over a period of 2 seasons have seen three completely different points, but did not catch (

01.03.2014 12:20, Yuri Semejkin:

This is not exuviae. No damages found during the check-up.

01.03.2014 11:11, Alex Dumchus:

Apparently, you have this ecological niche of swallowtail, which we have oh how little. One caught the year before it. A Parnassus, any sort are not available. But come the spring Polixena.
Personal Podalirius catching - not to damage the tails, so they are very gentle with him. Most of them and fly without tails.In general, very rarely come across in the state A1.

01.03.2014 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander Podalirius interesting to me once again of my and border regions as it is not only catching, but just to see him have a great success. Last season I had in the Vladimir region. not just seen and caught, but this bastard there also screwed together through a hole in the net. That's a shame, it was ......But nothing: this season, caught it again :) The main point I have.

28.02.2014 14:19, Alex Dumchus:

Sorry, didn't notice this is underside. Right, looks similar to croesus.

28.02.2014 14:18, Alex Dumchus:

This is clearly not Croesus! This is O.rothschildi!!!

28.02.2014 14:09, Alex Dumchus:

We have a lot of mnogo.Osobenno was the year before last year, smaller ones. If you need to contact us. Now, if podalirinusa words ... last year in Catalonia ran a subspecies of P. - frustofeldi seems, but never caught.

28.02.2014 10:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nakropal report in the store.

28.02.2014 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eurrhypara sp. Pyralidae..... Farther I pass (

28.02.2014 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pantherodes pardalaria / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.02.2014 8:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adhemarius gannascus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.02.2014 8:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

28.02.2014 7:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eacles ducalis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.02.2014 7:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eacles ducalis I think. Variable a lot it is........

28.02.2014 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adelowalkeria tristygma / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.02.2014 7:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eacles imperialis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.02.2014 6:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, confused, of courseIphiclides podalirius. However, we have this one, an ordinary species is found in the south, but very rarely :)

27.02.2014 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lycia hirtaria / Vitaly Gumenuk Lycia pomonaria / Andrey Ponomarev.

27.02.2014 20:41, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Lycia pomonaria

27.02.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euxoa karschi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

27.02.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Utetheisa pulchelloides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agree, most likely some of its ssp.

27.02.2014 16:48, Irina Nikulina:

Euxoa karschi http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Noctuinae/Euxoa_karschi.html

27.02.2014 16:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hadena aberrans / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2014 15:58, Irina Nikulina:

Hadena aberrans

27.02.2014 15:55, Irina Nikulina:

Hadena aberrans

27.02.2014 15:11, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, me too I opted turpis in the morning ) hesitating between the latter and confusa, you're right, they're quite variable... Got to not to ID and to seek more) also considering that Synev describes Sesamia genus in Primorye only.

27.02.2014 12:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

I seem to have hurried here, this is some Sesamia, turpis perhaps. They're quite variable.

27.02.2014 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Globia sparganii / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.02.2014 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neocalyptis liratana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.02.2014 12:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anaplectoides prasina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2014 12:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, whilst I was looking through pics :) you were faster :)

27.02.2014 11:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.02.2014 11:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anaplectoides prasina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.02.2014 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Anaplectoides prasina

27.02.2014 11:07, Irina Nikulina:

Neocalyptis liratana
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/51_Tortricidae/5001%20Tortricinae/500117_Neocalyptis/50011701_Neocalyptis_liratana_0137/Neocalyptis_liratana.htm

27.02.2014 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Anaplectoides prasina

27.02.2014 1:43, Peter Khramov:

As a lamp, the light Lampovo?

27.02.2014 0:50, Irina Nikulina:

Utetheisa pulchelloides , I suppose

26.02.2014 23:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We went to Malaysia (Sabah). Very badsome floors for the first time. During the day, however, all the rain, but it came off during the night.

26.02.2014 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote wiscotti / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.02.2014 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lycia pomonaria / Masha Gill Lycia hirtaria / Andrey Ponomarev.

26.02.2014 19:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.02.2014 13:03, Andrey Ponomarev: This species is identified correctly.

26.02.2014 13:03, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Lycia hirtaria as it has yellow back strings whilst Lycia pomonaria does white ones.

26.02.2014 8:22, Anna Gerasimova:

Ypthima pandocus Moore, [1858], I think

26.02.2014 3:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Melitaea sutschana Stgr ?

25.02.2014 20:12, Alex Dumchus:

Eacles sp, can't ID further as there are plenty of similar species of nearly same colour.

25.02.2014 20:07, Alex Dumchus:

Very sorry. I stumbled upon your negotiations. Actually, the question to Vasili: mb still podalirius, instead podalirinus, because the latter, in my opinion, is endemic and other sr.azii China. Scary rare and very appreciated by collectors.

25.02.2014 18:54, Alex Dumchus:

Adhemarius gannascus?

25.02.2014 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Such there: European_Red_List_of_Butterfies 2010 if it is necessary to send.

25.02.2014 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notodonta jankowskii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.02.2014 7:24, Alex Dumchus:

About CITES and Kr.knigi there are big doubts. Just go to commercial sites or ebey, and even Molbiol. How many sold Swallowtail, Parnassus and other troidesov! I can assure you without any CITES. Viet. so do trade teinopalpusami standard. And if I have a couple of copies of the exchange.of CITES is not the same I has caught them and got essno of the second, and even third-hand. Will every collector to exchange their copies to the other, he needs. Just need to advertise in the personal correspondence.

25.02.2014 5:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia hepatica / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.02.2014 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Thank you, good to hear)

24.02.2014 23:36, Maxim Schwarz:

So you finally did shoot it? Or it's just a dead corpse?

24.02.2014 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmia camptostigma / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.02.2014 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

24.02.2014 12:53, Irina Nikulina:

Cosmia camptostigma

24.02.2014 5:18, Vladimir Bobow:

Thank you!

23.02.2014 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.02.2014 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.02.2014 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.02.2014 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea trivia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.02.2014 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.02.2014 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melitaea phoebe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.02.2014 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, the search engine produces a bunch of subspecies Clossiana dia, but the combination in synonyms for Boloria dia, see what's there.

23.02.2014 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria dia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.02.2014 20:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Boloria dia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.02.2014 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.02.2014 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Issoria lathonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.02.2014 13:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The last generation is about 8—10cm long (raised them before). Neither small is the very moth :)

23.02.2014 13:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Just skip H. fuscescens as it's as well out in Kirpichnikova's work.

23.02.2014 13:05, Yuri Semejkin:

I had the genus signed in the original file (identified by V. A. Kirpichnikova) whilst the very species is indeed quite tough to ID. At any rate according to Kirpichnikova only genus can be IDed and the species requires genitalia examination.

23.02.2014 12:57, Irina Nikulina:

Yury, so I did say "with some doubt". The choice is small, there are 5 species in Primorye. Agree about the colour though I also saw light brown on the web. That's why I supposed fuscescens too despite it's out in Primorye according to Synev.

23.02.2014 12:44, Irina Nikulina:

This is Paratalanta sp., tough to ID the very species. Three of 5 Primorye species look very similar. I lean to Paratalanta cultralis (ssp.P.c. amurensis (Romanoff, 1887)), two others are taiwanensis и ussurialis. Here all three http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Paratalanta.html (Yury, here as in Herpetogramma case we should neither wait for any truth ()

23.02.2014 9:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you :)

23.02.2014 6:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Ira, ok then, let's assume this is Herpetogramma phaeopteralis. We may say that the latter has 2 specific small black spots in the medial cell, one of which at its end is brown. What can we see here? There is some browny spot under the upper band, one more darker is seen lower. Seems that fits but what about colour? Also the web descriptions mention both hind and forewings are of brown colour.

23.02.2014 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Irina!

23.02.2014 1:02, Irina Nikulina:

On the Day of Defender of the Fatherland congratulate all the men of the Site! High all of you in flight, love, creativity, life! Strong rear, strength, courage and confidence in the future! Calm and peaceful sky for all of us.

22.02.2014 22:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypomecis roboraria / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

22.02.2014 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2014 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Mythimna pallens / Andrey Ponomarev Mythimna pudorina / Sergei Kotov.

22.02.2014 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, I agree, this is not Mythimna pallens or just the mistaken ID, rather wrongly signed. Thanks, correcting.

22.02.2014 21:54, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, thank you. The question remains just could not)

22.02.2014 21:33, Sergei Kotov:

Quite similar to Mythimna pudorina (yet identified by Vlad Proklov).

22.02.2014 21:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Huge one... Thought this was smaller.

22.02.2014 21:21, Peter Khramov:

Irina, the selection kinds of dogs in general does not apply to the extent right. It is even a definition does not apply. It's just convenient, when in the middle of any text there is mention of the form and then, op, you can go directly to the page of the form. Ho.If, for example, the comments in the preceding references are already there, it is not necessary in every new comment jam (the same kind), it will not be easy, and the solid ripples from uncomfortable with reference reading.Therefore (all true) at the first mention of the type on the page dog set, then do not put, if the discussion was delayed, and you see that the first dog gone much down, and references to the form still relevant - then again, once set and then again missing.In other words, the ideal option - it is not a text without references and links ripples through every word of this text, which from time to time come across links that do not interfere with the perceived source single canvas.

22.02.2014 19:35, Irina Nikulina:

SupPosing actually))

22.02.2014 19:35, Irina Nikulina:

Herpetogramma sp. Suposing with some doubt this is Herpetogramma phaeopteralis, of 5 possible Primorye species. (Doubted about fuscescens but according to Synev it lacks in Primorye).

22.02.2014 18:48, Irina Nikulina:

Well, Alexander, I'll know. I thought it was the exclusive right of the moderators. One question - do so always or only when I'm in the definition of 100%?

22.02.2014 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Angerona prunaria / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.02.2014 17:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.02.2014 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.02.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.02.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.02.2014 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.02.2014 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.02.2014 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.02.2014 16:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Angerona prunaria female

22.02.2014 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And add even from his observations: I've seen enough of P. ruralis naturally .... This butterfly Chameleon and it changes color depending on the angle of view, as the light falls on it, etc. very much. Perhaps a non-traditional angle of the specimen. and photographed :)

22.02.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleksand, this moth I just checked himself several times and went through a number of possible options for that area, of all the usual ruralis is the best of all came :) And it does not comment Sergey served as the guiding factor here (it I wrote for persuasiveness). P.S. No offense: and there is only the pictures and determine (otherwise there is not given) :)

22.02.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Roger, luckily this is quite spread species in the whole Indo-Malayan region and also easily IDed, otherwise it could be hardly identified with such photo. Please try not to post pics of such quality in the future or use better ones.

22.02.2014 13:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna flavostigma / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.02.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lygephila pastinum / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.02.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I beg you, if not more difficult, not to transfer the pictures to the site and to Sergei, especially micro Palaearctic. I do not know, you're right in this case or not, but I asked, something to this photo povisel. I stop any further comments. Adelida I think improperly transferred and is not yasnopo Pleuroptya ruralis.And I beg you, if you have suffered does not pull from place to place, and to me it is also true. :)

22.02.2014 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pleuroptya ruralis / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

22.02.2014 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Taking Sergey's version and my preceded link, get to move :)

22.02.2014 12:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, I believe Basil Sergienko will check this and share his thoughts. Then we'll move :)

22.02.2014 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ira, a big request, certain species name, framed by a double "dogs" @, then get a direct link to the form, such asEmaturga atomaria

22.02.2014 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ematurga atomaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.02.2014 12:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orgyia recens / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.02.2014 12:05, Irina Nikulina:

Ematurga atomaria?

22.02.2014 11:56, Irina Nikulina:

Orgyia recens

22.02.2014 5:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Scopula immutata ?

22.02.2014 2:30, Roger Dolorosa:

I apologize for this blurred shot. The butterfly was quite far and fast moving making it difficult to capture a better shot.

22.02.2014 2:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

A.Schintlmeister - Notodontidae book has also quite decent illustrations of the species.

22.02.2014 2:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Besaia pallida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.02.2014 0:20, Irina Nikulina:

Here's the link to quite well photos of the species:
http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=164

22.02.2014 0:18, Irina Nikulina:

Mimopydna pallida (Butler, 1877) is an only species of this genus in Russian Far East. Synev describes it as Besaia pallida (Butler, 1877) and doesn't mention in Nizhnee Priamurye. Not confusing though as there's first proved found of Mimopydna pallida in the continent part of Russian Far East (Bychikha village, Khabarovsk region) which was described in the publication of V. V. Dubatolov and others "New discoveries of macro lepidoptera in Bolshetsekhirsky Nature Reserve 2012".

21.02.2014 23:22, Irina Nikulina:

Another toughie) Met this just once on the web, here http://tupian.baike.com/a0_11_48_20300001248577132825484590422_jpg.html?prd=so_tupian called Botyodes diniasalis . However I know both Botyodes in Primorye. According to Synev they're out in Nizhnee Priamurye still it's not about location but they just look different... Rather that website goes wrong. Can anyone say genus at least?)

21.02.2014 22:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sineugraphe exusta / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coming back to what I started with, this region is described in 40th region whilst I found nothing on Pyrausta neocespitalis on the continent.

21.02.2014 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrausta despicata / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna pallens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vanessa indica / Simon Coombes Vanessa vulcania / Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.02.2014 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vanessa indica / Simon Coombes Vanessa vulcania / Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.02.2014 19:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vanessa indica / Simon Coombes Vanessa vulcania / Eugene Karolinskiy.

21.02.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Laciniodes denigrata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.02.2014 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nemophora paradisea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 18:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

V. vulcania

21.02.2014 18:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

V. vulcania

21.02.2014 18:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

V. vulcania

21.02.2014 17:52, Irina Nikulina:

Laciniodes denigrata Warren, 1896 (ssp.ussuriensis Prout, 1939)

21.02.2014 17:15, Irina Nikulina:

Nemophora paradisea Butler, 1881. Male

21.02.2014 16:43, Irina Nikulina:

I thought the very same at first, pallens, but that spot confused me. Now when you elucidated about "floating" features I vote too for pallens)

21.02.2014 16:41, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, thanks. I neither thought about impura looking at the rest let alone the dot, that's why I prudently questioned this, just to clear this up for future cases)

21.02.2014 15:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Here can't agree, Mythimna impura, let's wait though for Svyatoslav's reply :)

21.02.2014 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm for Mythimna pallens

21.02.2014 15:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, black spots are not always a "feature", I wouldn't move this as the hind wings are not dark enough and the forewings don't have much contrast to move it surely.

21.02.2014 14:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna pudorina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 14:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna pudorina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 13:43, Irina Nikulina:

Also Mythimna pudorina ?

21.02.2014 13:41, Irina Nikulina:

Most likely Mythimna pudorina (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

21.02.2014 13:18, Irina Nikulina:

The third dot though not clear in its forewing is doubtful...(http://www.lepiforum.de/2_forum.pl?md=read;id=13959) I'd like to clear up the question, am I doubting wrongly or this is still impura? Please say something.

21.02.2014 13:14, Irina Nikulina:

Isn't here a mistake? I think this is impura

21.02.2014 13:10, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna impura (Hubner, 1808), I suppose

21.02.2014 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Leucoma candida / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

21.02.2014 5:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, thanks. Then I dot this i :)

21.02.2014 5:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily says right. This is Leucoma candida. The latter has such specific antennae with black narrow ringlets whilst L. salicis L. oppositely does them clearly white. There are two species in Russia.

21.02.2014 5:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euphyia cineraria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 5:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not crucial plus one minus one but it can help someone as for location.

21.02.2014 5:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr, thanks. Now after having been IDed can be deleted. The pic is far from fine, I got better. I'll add here once shoot it good.

21.02.2014 4:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergey, I'm reading, reading........ So did I write that I supposed that considering Synev where salicis is questioned.
Here there is no the shot date which could really help to dot all the i's as these two species have it quite different. The density of the dust cover is too in favour of my version. Never met such non-transparent salicis which are in plenty in Moscow in June. Let's wait for the shot date.

21.02.2014 4:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

21.02.2014 4:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycaena dispar / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 4:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, thanks, this is Lycaena dispar.

21.02.2014 4:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vanessa indica / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Not identified.

21.02.2014 3:51, Yuri Semejkin:

I checked old shots and found this one somehow identified as Vanessa indica. If compare this to others, http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9063 for one, seems not the same especially the pattern, fringe, wing curve which are quite different.
Any thoughts?

21.02.2014 2:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia contigua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 2:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacronicta caliginea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 2:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arytrura musculus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 2:10, Irina Nikulina:

Arytrura musculus (Menetries, 1859)

21.02.2014 2:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Enispa bimaculata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.02.2014 2:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhizedra lutosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 1:41, Irina Nikulina:

Enispa bimaculata (Staudinger, 1892)

21.02.2014 1:14, Irina Nikulina:

Euphyia cineraria (Butler, 1878)

21.02.2014 0:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithophane consocia / Vladimir Bobow Lacanobia contigua / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 0:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vladimir, this is definitely not Lithophane but some Hadeninae, Lacanobia something I think.

21.02.2014 0:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

21.02.2014 0:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 0:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phiaris umbrosana / Tentatively identified / Sergey Novitckiy Orthotaenia undulana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.02.2014 0:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Between two couples of "@"

21.02.2014 0:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, if not hard for you, please put species name between ___ to have for one Xanthia icteritia.

21.02.2014 0:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthia icteritia / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

21.02.2014 0:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthia icteritia / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

20.02.2014 23:41, Sergei Kotov:

Leucoma salicis is as well distributed in Primorye. Please read attentively the "Lymantriidae" thread on molbiol.ru.

20.02.2014 23:14, Sergei Kotov:

Pleuroptya ruralis
Sure if there is no another as similar species in the region.

20.02.2014 23:11, Sergei Kotov:

Xanthia icteritia

20.02.2014 23:11, Sergei Kotov:

Xanthia icteritia

20.02.2014 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I checked all possible species within Far East, so there is nothing similar more than Pleuroptya ruralis, as I see: http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Pleuroptya_ruralis.html (should check all pics). Can't stop thinking about that one :)
Won't move though, just put up for a discussion.

20.02.2014 21:27, Anna Gerasimova:

I've googled for long)))

20.02.2014 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I see not Sesiidae but some hawkmoth. Can't say anything certain with such pic.

20.02.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Considering the "warts" this is some saturniid.

20.02.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I now identify those animals who know exactly :) In fact, in the Palaearctic live-rail. About formalization signs: as an additional burden on offer? I know this system :) Come on, try. I like you the way to establish the LC. Do not forget :)

20.02.2014 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Minois dryas / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2014 19:14, Peter Khramov:

Basil: What about agreed Palearctic and exotics.
2All: Sergei Kotov Cher wrote a letter of resignation from the moderators, respectively, from that moment, he did not see this topic.
ZY Basil, you can try the system formalization signs instead of Sergei?

20.02.2014 14:18, Lev Bely:

Prayer hour.

20.02.2014 12:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syllepte segnalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2014 12:13, Irina Nikulina:

Syllepte segnalis (Leech, 1889)

20.02.2014 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Minois dryas I think. Just quite worn-out :)

20.02.2014 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leucoma candida ? Synev describes it in 36th, 37th and 40th region. Seems no other Leucoma there.

20.02.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Slightly seen reed abdomen in its sides. Too Chionarctia nivea. Synev describes it in 5 regions, 36th, 37th, 38th, 39th, 40th... I've got it as well in my collection :)

20.02.2014 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chionarctia nivea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2014 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chionarctia nivea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.02.2014 10:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chionarctia nivea. Found similar photo on the web: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/94217418.
I've got it too somewhere, should find and shoot from its underside (here topside only). Will do later :)

20.02.2014 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura felina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

20.02.2014 1:56, Irina Nikulina:

Cerura felina Butler, 1877. Finally addition to larvae, beauty.

19.02.2014 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree, imho Orthotaenia undulana.

19.02.2014 22:46, Sergei Kotov:

Got it. Two photos in the middle look quite similar to our thing.

19.02.2014 22:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Check this please:
http://www.lepiforum.de/webbbs/images/f1_2010/pic68681.jpg

19.02.2014 22:24, Sergei Kotov:

That's it. Just emerged and spreading its wings, thus the habitus seems kind of weird.

19.02.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whee, Cabera pusaria, really ? I meet it quite often. Can say nothing on this pic. Let alone the photo sucks, habitus also doesn't fit whichever. Can't be moved even to tentative.

19.02.2014 22:09, Sergei Kotov:

Celypha lacunana

19.02.2014 22:08, Irina Nikulina:

I did one second earlier)) But you was faster in Lemyra boghaika whilst I was looking for synonyms in Synev)))

19.02.2014 22:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Quite doubtful ID, Emmelina monodactyla doesn't rest like this. And please, don't give links to pics with such rest poses, genitalia examination only. :)

19.02.2014 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A white, supposedly Pareronia genus or something similar. Rare pic, don't want to keep this in not identified. Have been digging this already a few days, can't find. Anyone knows?

19.02.2014 21:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

19.02.2014 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thyrgorina boghaika / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.02.2014 21:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thyrgorina jankowskii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2014 21:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, I didn't get on, :) Synev describes this as Thyrgorina jankowskii, I found it, again one species in two genera, stuff for Petr to be done. Good I updated the page or would have to change the author :)

19.02.2014 21:26, Irina Nikulina:

Lemyra jankowskii (Oberthür, [1881])
Synev lacks this genus though mentioned in many books as a species distributed in Russia, especially in Primorye and Khabarovsk region.

19.02.2014 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, if you write it seriously, then you have to go to a shrink. Do you have something wrong with the perception of reality. Well, I will follow your advice, I will ignore your empty statements. Sorry, your definition of the right, which I have no doubt I will carry to the species, it's more expensive.In provocation no longer responds. Good luck in the war. :)

19.02.2014 20:57, Sergei Kotov:

And what's the point to speak his mind if no one is listening. I have already expressed my opinion here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/11755, here and here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/11756 http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27247. But there was no reaction (even if not in the pages of pictures - at least in this, official topic that no one sees). I understand, I began to significant to ignore. tolerate such a state of things, I do not intend to. War is war. I'll take the blow. Now I'll have to pull on any, even the slightest, about. Good life, I will not give you. You can ignore me, you can be banned altogether - as you wish. But I am not the enemy of the ceremony.

19.02.2014 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

SSergey, you itching to do it from the website to arrange a farce, rather than what to say your opinion, you begin to philosophize. For you specifically, if not able to understand in detail:
MOVED in time , there are already 4 opinions even look, can someone else will speak.

19.02.2014 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, just was I kidding, we're all so serious about all this :)
Will move, here are already 4 opinions, will wait a little bit.

19.02.2014 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nobody quarelling here, just Sergey didn't read right the comment sequence. Alexandr, then move it where it belongs. I'm nearly null in all these microlepidoptera, so don't take action :)

19.02.2014 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think, this is Orthotaenia undulana.

19.02.2014 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Bringing peace to you two, this is actually Orthotaenia undulana.

19.02.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The first comment was by Sergey Novitsky on 09.12.2012 19:31, second phrase.

19.02.2014 16:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

The specimen was IDed as E.unicolorella then updated as E. elutella. Tough family and genus, not sure of this new ID, no sense to move it from species to species :)

19.02.2014 16:06, Sergei Kotov:

Phiaris umbrosana
This pic is grouped with http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14401 which was "identified" by Sergey Novitsky.

19.02.2014 16:04, Sergei Kotov:

Eddy Verfaillie was the first who identified, should be corrected.

19.02.2014 16:02, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, do I get that right, Ephestia elutella is a wrong ID?

19.02.2014 15:59, Sergei Kotov:

Cabera pusaria

19.02.2014 15:59, Sergei Kotov:

Cabera pusaria

19.02.2014 15:06, Sergei Kotov:

" Sergey, I mean professional experts who work on the money for it receives "

These and molbiol barely walk, let alone on our site and they did nothing to dream lure.

19.02.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

So, explain, the, water, well traveled. :)
Sergey, I mean professional experts who work on the money for it receives all whom you have listed, experts - lovers can except B. Starodomskogo. :)

19.02.2014 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

19.02.2014 14:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

19.02.2014 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm still at 7:44 asked Eugene, what to do and waited for an answer. But as you can see: spurred :)
Frankly, if it were moved the MoD, would without question. In no other area of ​​my Ochlodes not fly :) This in fact I trust: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/33-rhop/hesperiidae/30-hesperiidae

19.02.2014 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then, is it close for a debate, and even too much "water" at the recent spate of other things :). Alexander, there is posted a few Spilosoma Far East: necessary Activities them :) Well, I'll try them too posherstiv ....

19.02.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

We think the same way about a lot :), I also wanted to Perens. :)

19.02.2014 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil is now checked Online 1 lepiforum.de Dyspessa, that laid Ozgur Kocak, and he is there it spread, and it is also determined there like you, but with the proviso that they do not know what else might be in Turkey. But the picture remained on the forum, and not perneseno the site. moderators did not accept this definition. This self-respecting site. There are very competent people and a lot of them.But to accurately determine this butterfly can not. And this site is online thousands of definite and indefinite photos that are not on the site itself, but on the species pages are almost no errors.
We rescued. "imprecise definition of" can not complain, who say the exact ?. it's really bad.when they want to remove the photos are uncertain and it is good when it is determined, but doubts remain. And it is desirable to take into account who determine which source identified, and where he is an expert.

19.02.2014 13:01, Sergei Kotov:

Or so I do not consider myself an expert, the most "advanced amateur", and then only with great reserve.

19.02.2014 13:00, Sergei Kotov:

And assuming the following question, which is very likely could be followed by Alexander in response to my previous remark, I will answer: I myself do not consider myself an expert.

19.02.2014 12:56, Sergei Kotov:

And where experts in the full sense of the word you have noticed on our site? Only Zhakov Alexander and Vasily Sergienko, well, a stretch (albeit amateur, but people have already experienced), mention may be made of Vasily Feoktistov. Previously, Vlad was still damned Boris Starodomsky Anatoly Krupitsky, Svyatoslav Knyazev, but they escaped, "like the devil from holy water."Well, let. Do not want to help - and not necessary.

19.02.2014 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochlodes sylvanus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2014 12:48, Sergei Kotov:

The experts go to the site, where one kind of butterflies are two families fleeing from this site, as the devil from holy water.

And worthless if such professionals, if not help to understand and prefer to flee. No need to worry about it.

19.02.2014 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, well, in that case (if you put a question mark for reinsurance) :) Calling as a moderator of the fire itself (for kicks is not afraid) :). And yet, more like Eugene agreed .....

19.02.2014 12:39, Sergei Kotov:

" are easily distinguished by size (venatus larger) "
It is not necessary to appeal to size. From the photographs the size of the butterfly still do not understand.

19.02.2014 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We do not vary our understanding of the wrong definition: What a statement, really :) Just if you have a website daw "inaccurate" then it should be put right if you can not specify a specific, accurate option.Let uberёm it and all at once will fall into place (by the way, and it is not very very much and like it) :) No offense, to me it's not the emotions in this case, but just my point of view. But grates me a lot that is overgrown.Therefore periodically dig a fresh mind section indefinite :) On Vikikakiyu I referred because there clearly shows all of these upheavals, at butterflies :)

19.02.2014 12:36, Sergei Kotov:

Vasily, I didn't offer any versions on what's this species. Just noted that this photo features the specimen quite well (despite two other pics of the specimen).

19.02.2014 12:06, Irina Nikulina:

Sergey, your confidence ... to be envied not only in this case. Decide dear moderators, where to put. But I want to Add- not seen in nature, and those and others. In nature sputaesh- easily distinguished by size (venatus larger), color (no gray underside greenish ginger).The underside venatus have very uniform, feeble spots, sometimes even indistinguishable. The question mark delivered more for reinsurance. I will try to put in time dr.vidy.

19.02.2014 12:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree, at the expense of hysteria can be corrected on the emotions. If your site will begin the confrontation, for the correct identification and definition of the surface. I will stand for the right, and I will do it by all means. The fact that our notions of proper identification, is very different, very sorry.I will not make statements you with Sergei, resignation, is not going away, but I do not like the surface definition, and may be uncertain in 1000 photo, but it is less certain blunders. Specialists go to the site, where one kind of butterflies are two families fleeing from this site, as the devil from holy water.And Sergei, I ask, not to make statements, to heat up the atmosphere at the site, such as: Basil, make it right, stand your ground and do not give up. , I agree here with Alexander, .
I do not want to waste time on this scribbling, instead of the definition.
Let's be mutually polite. And we will hold their emotions in the pages of forms.If the accumulated emotions, there is the theme of a service, where they and speak to each other.
About imprecisely defined, has open a discussion if unsure of a particular form, if it is determined to sort, it is not "inaccurate" definition and determination to species.By borers and has a very difficult group, can it really all one type, while Basil is absolutely right, but when there is now 5-6 species described, then it is up to nature. It may exaggerate, I measure everything by itself.
With regard to Wikipedia, do not refer to it, it will only complicate the understanding of the issue.

19.02.2014 11:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergey, there are lots of Eudocma sp. in Southwest Asia, plenty of similar species. Won't try to ID this anyhow, even no possible versions. Quite ragged it is........

19.02.2014 11:28, Sergei Kotov:

Two other pics of this specimen http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/20633 and http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/22453) may be not satisfying, whilst this one is good enough, everything's clearly seen. Am I wrong?

19.02.2014 11:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia lucifuga / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

19.02.2014 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia lucifuga / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

19.02.2014 11:21, Sergei Kotov:

I looked at photos Ochlodes venatus the Internet. What I want to say. Differences from sylvanus zero, they do not. Paired Ochlodes sylvanus / venatus seems only possible definition of drugs genitals. In addition, in Primorye there are other species of the genus Ochlodes. On the site there are no people who could clarify this point. We do not have good people on Rhopalocera.Needless to think about how to handle this photograph, let hanging in uncertainty.

19.02.2014 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia sophia / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

19.02.2014 11:02, Sergei Kotov:

If you are satisfied ?, transferred to incorrect
If it is possible to endure inaccurate. I am guided not only by signs O. Pekarsky, but also his personal observations. In my area Cucullia lucifuga, Napara C. umbratica, the most banal kind kapyushonnits I catch them every year at dozens. And they are all very similar to that of Slovakia. Oh, and one more thing.In Cucullia lucifuga "bean-shaped" stain on the front fender well expressed, it is quite clearly seen from C. lactucae and C. pustulata is weak, it is hard to see.

19.02.2014 10:50, Basil Sergienko:

According to Synev, Eupithecia sophia is distributed in the neighbour region.

19.02.2014 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ale6ksandr, I see no hysteria, just have an opinion on the account transfer.Opinions remaining members I'm trying to ask is always, in this kosside asked more than a month ago (a month is enough time to respond to anything), the reason for the transfer wrote and directed in inaccurate (presence of jackdaws involves the subsequent transfer to the exact or retracting ago in neoprene. if there is a good reason).It's nothing personal on my part. Where hysteria? I just have my opinion on this matter, which may be different from yours, and no it does not impose.

19.02.2014 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In this case I can agree with you. Myself doubt a alot, don't know them in this region even I wrote yesterday I'd move. P. ruralis is quite common here (as well as anywhere, I think), never met it looking like this. I happen to see a load of 50 when they fly to my balcony at night......

19.02.2014 7:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, you can clean up in inaccurate or plans to do the excavation you?

19.02.2014 4:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yes, it is likely sylvanus. Doubts, however, have I not been in Primorye and venatus in nature is unknown to me.

19.02.2014 3:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, to be honest, this argument that does not stand, since the availability of pustulata, which is not in Slovakia, but there is in the western Ukraine and Poland, to compare the two species, Oleg also showed how to distinguish Plusia, but you are not very well turned out . :) He is looking at more than a dozen copies, each species has made for itself a generalization. The pictures it is not working.Why have one wing blackout, and the other is not, it is a shadow :). And what should be the wing if it rests on the list? Clever ?, so clever! I show that a convincing case for you, is not always compelling for others.But, oddly enough, I support your decision, but not sure that it is correct, I am not so well know, these kinds of, to be sure.
If you are satisfied ?, transferred to inaccurate or wait more versed in these types? But sometimes, the more you know, the harder it is to make a decision. :)

19.02.2014 2:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Please don't, stay this here, it's not shiny but dim :)

19.02.2014 2:20, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

19.02.2014 2:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syngrapha interrogationis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.02.2014 1:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote uncula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.02.2014 1:50, Peter Khramov:

It will be ready - please.

19.02.2014 1:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

19.02.2014 1:42, Peter Khramov:

Most likely Thailand.

19.02.2014 1:40, Peter Khramov:

Let's keep this.

19.02.2014 1:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

And I can not answer if you do not know the correct answer? and uncertain to hang until decide :)

19.02.2014 1:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily we purpose of the site, remove the vague picture, or make a competent website. Again begins hysteria ( there and so ............ horror that it is necessary to rake: took. ) on the urgent transport, again compare the pictures, but not decisive.slowly but surely, and correctly, and a few times to ask, to hear other opinions, I believe that we should not dig, and identify and possibly correct.

19.02.2014 0:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erionota torus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.02.2014 0:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Grounds: http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/293-Erionota/Erionota-torus

19.02.2014 0:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erionota torus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.02.2014 0:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems nothing else (silence implies consent). Moving.

19.02.2014 0:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let it stays here till tomorrow, if no other versions, will move this to ruralis )

19.02.2014 0:36, Irina Nikulina:

There are lots of them to compare. The patter is the same, but big difference can be due to difference light, shot angles and just overall lightning. Last summer I shot the same specimen in different light, 4 times.... Looked like 4 different species) Can be distinguished by pattern only)

19.02.2014 0:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaorhinus viridiluteata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

19.02.2014 0:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good there is underside also. Moving.

19.02.2014 0:27, Irina Nikulina:

Tanaorhinus viridiluteatus (Walker, 1861)
http://taibif.tw/zh/catalogue_of_life/page/0211-3c5b-db17-04d8-286a-7592-0181-ef7e-namecode-345308

19.02.2014 0:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P. S. Found amidst mine our local, loaded just to check the difference: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27706

18.02.2014 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Checked the links. Not the one, this one instead looks more of ruralis, imho. Wait for some opinions more.

18.02.2014 22:49, Irina Nikulina:

Still I think this is it. The rest 5 Pleuroptya in Primorye are way more different, only could be compared to harutai. Here are its pics on the web: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/63_Crambidae/6109_Pyraustinae/610905200_Pleuroptya/610905212_Pleuroptya_harutai_1634/Pleuroptya_harutai.htm
http://www.geocities.jp/otatsugio/ga/639-119-ookibara.html

18.02.2014 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's distributed in 40th region, though doesn't look like our local in Moscow region, as I see. Far East people, halloo :)

18.02.2014 20:02, Sergei Kotov:

Cucullia lucifuga Grounds: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10766

18.02.2014 19:37, Sergei Kotov:

I think it's Cucullia lucifuga. At the time, Oleg Baking Offline molbiol in the topic "Definition of Butterflies" shows how to distinguish between types of C. lucifuga and C. lactucae (third similar species C. pustulata in Slovakia is not, according to the catalog on our website). What we have in this case? Darken the outer edge of the front wing there (in C.lactucae it does not happen) plus sharply defined outer corner of the front wing (at C. lactucae it is more rounded). Conclusion:Cucullia lucifuga.

18.02.2014 19:13, Sergei Kotov:

Definitely not C. lucifuga. C. lucifuga has no yellow margins in its forewings whilst this specimen has and a huge one. I agree with Alexandr here that this is most likely Cucullia balsamitae though this species never mentioned in Moscow region, will be a new one in the hood.

18.02.2014 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can't it be C. lucifuga? The latter and umbratica are most common here (shot approx. 10km around my place).

18.02.2014 18:58, Sergei Kotov:

Typical Hypomecis roboraria

18.02.2014 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, but after six weeks ago asked. How-Well you can hang in neoprene. There and so ............ horror that it is necessary to rake: undertook. And we only fresh picture race. Therefore suffered in inaccurate and should be will- "kicked" in another place :)

18.02.2014 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eudocima sp. Species can't be IDed with this pic.

18.02.2014 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eudocima sp. Impossible to ID the species with this pic.

18.02.2014 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Calpinae
Quite ragged Eudocima sp.?
My diagnosis is that's impossible to ID the species with this pic...... Alas :(

18.02.2014 18:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hmmm, Basil, and you options Dyspessa arabeska, Dyspessa aphrodite, Dyspessa emillia and other yellow Dyspessa considered? I Dyspessa salicicola, caught a lot, I do not like it. Transfer the back is not necessary, let hang in inaccurate, but should not be in such groups, who do not know as to carry, better ask again. :)

18.02.2014 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eressa confinis / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

18.02.2014 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dyspessa salicicola / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put in inaccurate: a half months aging on the site after the above assumption, a reasonable period. Moreover, the form is given to Turkey :)

18.02.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ophthalmis milete / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved to tentatively identified accroding to the author's comment. Looks more of T. subocellata: http://www.noctuidae.de/page/art/89_0762.html. There's also another wikipedia pic (don't like it personally but nearly no pics on the web): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Targalla_subocellata_(Noctuidae_Euteliinae).jpg

18.02.2014 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Targalla subocellata / Tentatively identified / John Moore.

18.02.2014 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, so Pyralidae. I was looking for in Barsine as usual :)

18.02.2014 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heortia vitessoides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 13:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heortia vitessoides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 13:43, Irina Nikulina:

Heortia vitessoides

18.02.2014 13:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ectropis lutamentaria (Graeser, 1888) with funeta apparently was driven instead of Sinev: http://ftp.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/ennominae/ectropis/index.html There is still full of such inconsistencies due to lack of uniform classification of the site.

18.02.2014 13:28, Irina Nikulina:

Ectropis sp. I would say that the most likely Ectropis excellens http://catocala.narod.ru/geom122.html. In this region, there are only a 2 to Sinev. What confused ... Some sites are still given a separate species Ectropis bistortata, for example in the same Atlas Berlova - and there it is very similar to excellens http://catocala.narod.ru/geom132.htm (his image on the network a lot). But most sources bistortata is synonymous Ectropis crepuscularia.Therefore, crepuscularia also did not rule out the more so in the Far East has its own subspecies Ectropis crepuscularia lutamentaria Graeser, 1888 (in Sinev 1889). But to him is not all clear: it is in Sinev subspecies to crepuscularia, and we've got some reason there is a separate species http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/63377. With this we must somehow find out ...

18.02.2014 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Athyma perius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Athyma perius / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, not again put so defined.

18.02.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gonoclostera timoniorum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 12:04, Irina Nikulina:

Gonoclostera timoniorum (Bremer, 1861)

18.02.2014 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clostera anachoreta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.02.2014 10:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleeksandr, in general, I did vooobsche on the phone screen immediately guessed at work and gave a link to the form, and enter this link has not been the time :)
Here it is, native and immediately recognizable. Even if with ET :)

18.02.2014 10:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra perflua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.02.2014 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily it on every page overlooking indicated regions of Russia, where they meet, it's out of the blue. In a sample of 37 directories for region 4 species Clostera. all familiar with the images. Feel free to endure. :)

18.02.2014 7:44, Alexander Belousov:

Yeah, right! Sorry! You already said that.

18.02.2014 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clostera anachoreta? Wrap is not going as the Far East, and the blue of the hand are not. I Was-would be transferred MO-even without thinking :)

18.02.2014 3:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena tristalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.02.2014 3:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna velutina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 2:33, Peter Khramov:

Basil, on the new types of institutions have discussed over the phone, do this will be more than one person, as it was before.
Shamil about the pictures, and they are now quite a used, I think, to facilitate the task of those who do so, not worth it, even for advertising through the signature image.Efficiency is not the -)
With regard to upload pictures to the site - as said before, I'll do it. Although regular moronic amendments to the law on copyright does not know whether to load images in general, not to mention their storage on the site. It's time to get a new nationality, and crawl out from under the jurisdiction of our legislators, that they were empty.

18.02.2014 1:29, Irina Nikulina:

Eugene, thank you very much! Of course, not aquilina) And as I ugorazdilo) .. sylvanus? Not ochracea, not subhyalina, not venatus, I think. You have to start DV tolstogolovok put and deal) I hope for your help.

18.02.2014 1:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paradiarsia punicea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.02.2014 1:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Bibasis aquilina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Not identified.

18.02.2014 1:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree, any objections/guesses? :)

18.02.2014 1:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

+1 :)

18.02.2014 1:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

It Ochlodes.

18.02.2014 0:42, Irina Nikulina:

Mythimna velutina (Eversmann, 1846)?

17.02.2014 23:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Move :)

17.02.2014 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, you do not need to apologize, you're emotionally speaking, yes, but the emotions of experience to work, to make it better. Emotions will be held, the case will be. And we do it all together and the more we will understand, and interact, the more interesting and faster we do it and have fun.:)
And to judge controversial points you need but without the raids and abuse. To do this, Peter and created an official theme. :)

17.02.2014 23:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree with Vasily. :)

17.02.2014 23:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree, any objections/guesses? :)

17.02.2014 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So neat it is) Thanks!

17.02.2014 23:24, Irina Nikulina:

Beauty saves the world)

17.02.2014 23:19, Irina Nikulina:

Paradiarsia punicea (Hubner, 1803)?

17.02.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, for my part I have stopped all the controversy. It is not absolutely necessary. Frankly, these srachi tired. It should be easy thing to do :) I'm not a fan of this controversy, and here as possessed by a demon, I'm sorry.

17.02.2014 22:34, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, please upload pics with dry specimens with only one specimen per one pic and if possible without any additional info/marks, you may use instead comments on the species photo page, the additional info section and the field selection "gender/angle".

17.02.2014 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, where shall I go from here :) It's just nerves play tricks on all recently dissolved concoctions (and not only from her). Very poor become: old probably ... :( After the site is already almost five years and I already can not live without it :)

17.02.2014 19:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily and Sergei, I am no longer with you will not enter the debate on the pages of forms, let's say here that people do not like to scare the spores moderators. Anyway, when we write about the different types and then no one will understand what it says.I have a claim to the fact that sometimes the definition is carried out superficially, the picture is similar, and all that kind of determined, and that the tribe has a dozen similar species, the image of which is not, is not taken into account. It may be excusable in relation to the tropics and then ..And on your territory to produce an error is not good, and I am a foreign citizen must for this experience? Science is international, well traveled.
When migrating species that are identified by other authors, I try to check the correctness of the definition, then that would not tolerate several times from one species to another.I'm trying to determine what is more or less understand, many groups try not to touch it if you are unsure, afraid to make a mistake. And it is not funny, I do not define Parnassus, they did not interest me, and it is my right.Sergei, you moved on to direct insults, I perceive your last post: Do you consider yourself "almost navel of the earth" who never owed nothing to anybody, but everything around it should? It smacks of megalomania.
You're turned upside down. This is called a provocation.Here I do not have to report and prove anything, I'm worried for the correctness and image of the site and not the education of its visitors and moderators, I do not have at this time of such a task.
Not the right definitions and translations will be corrected.

17.02.2014 18:25, Sergei Kotov:

In this photo agree with Alexander, I looked closely (and in comparison with the above features) photo, and yes, it still Plusia festucae.

17.02.2014 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, let me ask, what's the incorrect something expressed? Sorry, but every person has the right to doubt, even if it is determined matte, yes, I and Sergei just agreed, using other sources, that the definition of a wrong it is not incorrect. In the end, any determination not believe the axiom, and even the definition of haze.And to clarify the question is removed. Tolerance? I do not like that word, "In a dispute born truth," and it is quite normal.

17.02.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Actebia praecurrens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.02.2014 17:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Picture something is booted, leave the link http://yadi.sk/d/Fmut9g9pJ4HEX And ​​again, just trying to download

17.02.2014 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov:


Axel Steiner on lepiforum.de http://www.lepiforum.de/forum2007.pl?md=read;id=68828 described in detail the differences between the two species. Here is loosely translated in the reduction (some images flipped and mirrored in order to have one view, the letters turned over too :().
1. sash aQ, between (W & M) makes a sharp zigzag between the veins near the top spot at the festucae without zigzag from putnami
2.sling M (in this case inverted) passes between the patches or spots at the external festucae (often hard to see), and between or among the domestic spot putnami (usually seen well)
Between the bands and iQ bQ, often viewed from another sash festucae, and very rarely in putnami.I think not correct behavior Sergey and Vasily against Alexey Matt and Eugene Komarov. We're all doing the same thing, we must not forget about the ambitions and be more tolerant.

17.02.2014 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This must be put somewhere such as Yandex gallery, then right-click to select a team to open the image, copy the link to the image. Then click here to see prices corresponding button and paste the link in the opened window. It is desirable to make the size of no more than 800x600

17.02.2014 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Obyasneny was not yet :) Vasily tell me how to put a picture on the site in the text, I painted a couple of pictures for example lepiforuma with their explanations here would put that in the future would be fewer questions arise. :)

17.02.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now the question is removed. It is strange that they are not in the group (the question was, would not).
For a clarification thanks. Lighting, camera angle or something did not get.

17.02.2014 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

This exact same butterfly that snapped the photograph http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/9729, only a few minutes earlier. This could have been stopped, but I spent a few hours trying to explain the pictures available for znatakov the differences between these two species, which would then have been no resentment, we ignore. itentichnost photos got out by accident. :)

17.02.2014 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Plusia putnami / Sergei Kotov Plusia festucae / Evgeny Komarov.

17.02.2014 13:41, Svetlana Shchavelina:

As for the pictures ... I understand that in this case they are first placed on the service side to save photos (eg www.photobucket.com) or any other resource, and then the address of this photo is filled by pressing the "picture from another site" .

From my personal experience.As moderator of a very large resource with experience of 8 years and the owner of its own website, which is already 5 years, I would say that everything that has been placed on third-party resources, the owners of these resources have the right and remove. Especially it does not shrink from radical and the like ... In 2-3 years after the download (and sometimes a year) pictures uploaded there, begin to disappear ...Therefore, on its website all the pictures I have pumped into the body of a website if it does not make the users. Yes, it increases the amount of memory required on the server, but makes life easier later.As a summary: Necessary buttons "Picture from a computer" and limit the weight of the loaded image (for example, 100 KB), to avoid overloading the server much, because there are always enthusiasts to upload photos to 5 MB.

17.02.2014 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergey, I will explain tomorrow if nobody overtake. For now, just work and write with your phone. Yes, and is not available in connection with the work.

17.02.2014 13:11, Sergei Kotov:

Basil, but as you attach images to Comments? Explain, please. Sam does not understand.

17.02.2014 6:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you're my problem with LC solve, please. And not replaced by a photo (described just above). I have gradually become overgrown and need to understand.

17.02.2014 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Too bad there can not edit the comments: I could not collect my thoughts (tired of banal). Accordingly, this matter should be moderator capabilities only one moderator, who does it and the administrator. Well, the decision to add the form to be taken collectively to avoid disputes, grievances, etc. All of this is self-obsuzhdaemo.

17.02.2014 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well I matured and I have the actual offer at the moment. Responsible for driving a species to the database should be one person, but not all together, someone wants both. Then I think the quality and increase the likelihood of such a present situation with bastilla / dysgonia will be minimized. Can I take on this responsibility.

17.02.2014 4:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arctornis alba / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

17.02.2014 4:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So move it to confidently identified then if no opinions/objections.

17.02.2014 2:57, Peter Khramov:

Removed misleading comments on the topic.
Now in the case, the question of adding / reducing species really matured. The following quote their vision algorithms and approaches, if anyone has other views - inform, discuss, and is as follows:
The only unique identifier of any kind (as well as supraspecific taxa) on the site - it is his number.Number of pages visible in Urla form (web page address to the Swallowtail - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8787 - numbers that come after a taxonomy / - this is the number of taxa, ie swallowtail is 8787). In addition, on each page of a species or other taxon has approximately the line of urn: lsid: lepidoptera.pro: taxname: 8787. This stitch is put down for a reason, but just as a unique identifier of a taxon. Therefore, this kind of - at first view of the number 8787, and then later Papilio machaon . And if it turns out that the name for him validly else, then we will not add the form number 79000 with the new name and delete the old form of 8787. We will rename Papilio machaon a new species, but the number he will remain the same - 8787. Similarly - with synonyms.Therefore, when you transfer pictures to the species, we do not actually transfer them to the form, for example, Papilio machaon, we transfer them to the form №8787, which is currently called Papilio machaon.
This implies:
should never be added to the base of the new species or other taxa, if their analogues / synonyms are already on the site .Even if the name of a species from a site three times out of date, it is not necessary to add a new look and ask me to remove the old. We need to throw my info, so I renamed the old look to the new. The old name or a new species at the site has a constant number, and it should not be changed.Algorithm of actions when transferring photons to the species:
If the site is not at all kind and in any way - of course, we start a new kind and drag him.If the views of the site though in what form is (another generic combination as a synonym, or something like that) - move to this type, and if we believe the name of the obsolete system or wrong - we offer it to change, but on the page type, picture all the same It should be moved to a form which is already available on site. The new plant is not necessary.If you find that your site already has several types of doubles, you need to deal with them, moving, if necessary, some of them to others as synonyms.

17.02.2014 0:58, Jean-Paul Herzet: This species is identified correctly.

16.02.2014 23:28, Irina Nikulina:

The options do not. But I again do not understand anything. Dear moderators, please explain all the same sequence of actions, it's got to be one ..Why in some cases, we are looking for here on the website, view, synonym, and often find (do not cite examples, a lot of them), and in other cases you make a page with a new species, although the site there are synonymous to it? As in this case Bastilla. After the site has Dysgonia fulvotaenia http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/71560. Why, then, did not create a new kind of Bastilla crameri http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 25721, and just put it in Dysgonia crameri?
(this is a continuation of the discussion here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27138.)

16.02.2014 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Bastilla fulvotaenia Dysgonia fulvotaenia.

16.02.2014 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysgonia fulvotaenia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.02.2014 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Although it is possible and accurate: options do not.

16.02.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just today, the formBastilla fulvotaeniamade to a transfer of neoprene. Is it vary? But really there is no such option. Putting in inaccurate?

16.02.2014 22:44, Irina Nikulina:

Dysgonia (Bastilla) fulvotaenia, probably. It was her yellow medial band on the rear cr, unlike other species. See. Diagnosis http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/ophiusini/ophiusini_8_10.php

16.02.2014 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sadly don't know any website on Russian Far East :( Or aren't there entomologists not to seek Japanese websites instead.... Most probable is A. alba as I see : http://www.sgzb.net/onews.asp?id=508 Any opinions more? So far won't move it anywhere.

16.02.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here, in "amerikosovsky" pictures you can see: http://www.butterfliesandmoths.org/species/Plusia-putnami

16.02.2014 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, let him lie down. Although for me so I putnami it is.

16.02.2014 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil now let vylezhu here, but we'll see, it is not necessary to pull several times a day from species to species. In comments Information is, rain or even opinions confidence. :)

16.02.2014 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A year later noticed :)
Or Dysgonia sp. about the kind of thoughts would ......

16.02.2014 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, do not be disappointed if I did not pick Sinev people, material and would publish a directory, used up to now, have wondered what where, and how we interpret this or that kind, according to the Japanese or the Europeans. And now everything is blue, according to the Russian system.:) Yes, there are drawbacks, now only to supplement and correct, but is now working on the same basis. :)

16.02.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By JW I give in and apologize that butted, but it reminds me more aceris (if intermedia its subspecies) or auricoma: both if you believe the notorious Sinev should be there.

16.02.2014 21:14, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you Vasily Sergienko, gave confused in these difficult Acronicta) Maybe you see another photo in which bending is also very similar to the bond concerpta, especially in Yap. sites lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27134?

16.02.2014 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta concerpta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.02.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm in the blue 2008 very pazocharovyvayus lately: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/search/detail.dsml?TaxonNo=261372

16.02.2014 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, as well as another on the specimen? Generally it in neoprene. remove what?

16.02.2014 20:52, Irina Nikulina:

1. Use Triaena, because It provides links to Yap. sites where race Triaena. The brackets and pointed valid name. 2. We focus on Sinev, and Sinev (resp. Here) intermedia - a separate species. 3. I thought it closer to the intermedia, cuspis gave the second var-t. Perhaps mistaken both.

16.02.2014 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, it's like in that movie "" There were two comrades "," soldiers in sight girl looking at each other and says: you have showed me dumplings, which I have seen. I just answer;) is just one of the signs, which sometimes does not work or it is not visible.

16.02.2014 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, but not cuspis it, now try to determine at Kononenko. Basil, it is not necessary to give the European ET types links, they do not always work. :) And Acronicta kind of complicated, sometimes only the gene. Truly, I say :)

16.02.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why did not she? Reasons?

16.02.2014 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I see no reason in this whole thing :) Alexander, download what I am guided: http://rghost.ru/52455754
Photography is really very vague. And here you can not say no for that and not for another :).

16.02.2014 20:35, Irina Nikulina:

Anywhere. Why somewhere to endure, if the type is not defined yet? I just suggested. Jpmoth.org In addition, there are others. Sources such http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=557. Perhaps will et al. Assumption / definitions are the same or more faithful.

16.02.2014 20:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta cuspis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Not identified.

16.02.2014 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I would not stand this photo, I see no reason, you are again in a hurry. I have advised and probably moved back. Bad picture, hard to see, however, in such cases, if there is no self-confidence, it is better not to move. :)

16.02.2014 20:30, Irina Nikulina:

Most likely Arctornis alba Bremer, 1861

16.02.2014 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hint: same Acronicta sp.

16.02.2014 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliothis maritima / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.02.2014 19:36, Irina Nikulina:

Heliothis maritima (Graslin, 1855)

16.02.2014 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta cuspis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.02.2014 19:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

However, Cho is I cuspis, of course: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acronicta_Cuspis
I bear :)

16.02.2014 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, you should not use the generic name Triaena (it's the Japanese and they write all characters) :) validity Acronicta. Regarding intermedia: she was like as a subspecies Acronicta aceris: http://oopt.aari.ru/bio/64012
I will raise up cuspis, but we must wait and see what the people had to say .... :)

16.02.2014 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In another candidacy: toAcronicta catocaloidait looks like, and if it were to be seen rear wings just a little ........... Carbonaria disappears immediately if the focus on its image on jpmoth Where to endure? ???

16.02.2014 18:50, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps, Triaena (Acronicta) intermedia http://catocala.narod.ru/noc104.html
http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Triaena_intermedia.html
http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=519
or Triaena (Acronicta) cuspis http://catocala.narod.ru/noc118.html
http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Triaena_cuspis.html
http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=540&

16.02.2014 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I thought onAcronicta rumicis, but she (in this version) on the inner edge of the front wings are almost always white specks are present. Ugh, you no thought can not express. The link is necessary to come, that I have laid out: here it, the site is complete.

16.02.2014 18:10, Irina Nikulina:

Perhaps one of the two Hylonycta - catocaloida or carbonaria. Wrote Hylonycta - as they are the Japanese in this genus (search). There - Acronicta. And in general, and Viminia rumicis (our Acronicta rumicis) in the Far variant is not excluded http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Viminia_rumicis.html

16.02.2014 15:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, there you have full species Sinev. There seems to dig for subfamily Acronictinae. Was it were closer to me: one on megacephala set-to ........ Here it is lack of information affects "guesswork" ........

16.02.2014 15:17, Yuri Semejkin:

It is not Acronicta megacephala ([Denis & Schiffermtiller. Justification: It is not on the territory of Khabarovsk, Primorsky edges. And the kind of looks like another? Rod really is divided into several subgenera, which some considered to be an independent genus.

16.02.2014 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and on beetles proektiki can stir up? We are here with Alexei conceive about the site of Cerambycidae :) joke, of course, the butterflies are not having a relationship. And that really is the best site for the region Alexander Boldyrev is Sungaya. Just now he is a "people" has moved down to the other paid hosting because of the sale by Yandex "people," "yukoz" :)

16.02.2014 15:03, Peter Khramov:

Why produce misery when you can do everything in the framework of the Project without any further problems with the website of the service. Would infa but who spread.

16.02.2014 14:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's sad that there are enthusiasts ... For example, in the Moscow region. Alexander Boldyrev have a website (one of the authors here) growing on enthusiasm: http://insectamo.ru/ I consider it the best site in the region and he is always helping on a photo of the beetles. Sadly ..... I swear.

16.02.2014 14:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil. Normal site for butterflies Far East and in particular the Primorye Territory, in the network there. Why? - It does not matter to me.
The site in general is not a photo album, it should be conducted, it should work to develop, and it takes time and is not small. Perhaps the reason for his lack of it.

16.02.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So as to attach a photo where the habitat was caught a butterfly, made in the same day. This forest road passing near the seed orchards, located near the station "Nerskaya River" LMC.This plantation in the narrow circles of Moscow entomologists called "Mirmidonyatnik" or "Mirmidonopitomnik" thanks
abundance in those parts zheltushkiColias myrmidone(her own and then went there)

16.02.2014 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, that's in the expanded form it is in the group. Only hands reached :) By the way: since Jacob had not seen even once, although there seems like it should be where the run hither.

16.02.2014 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And add a reference to help that kind of most, that neither is valid: http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=449413

16.02.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it's not there: Now in blue looked. But this is precisely one of Acronicta, check.
By the way: this butterfly that I have previously incorrectly called simply Acronicta megacephala ([Denis & Schiffermtiller], 1775) And in the race Subacronicta site here's the link: http: // lepidoptera.ru / taxonomy / 1353 Ah, come from the Far East to your entomologists, but did at least have one decent-(definitive) site was in the Far East of the Russian Federation: can miss something, but did not see this in a network. And then all Japan, but Berlov.

16.02.2014 12:31, Yuri Semejkin:

The under-ve Acronictinae determinant on Far East this kind does not exist. In the catalog this website in any taxon, the genus is also missing.

16.02.2014 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Which one is better? This one or http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26872 ? Seems double only differently framed.

16.02.2014 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

16.02.2014 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea assamensis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.02.2014 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is it: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Antheraeopsis%20assamensis.htm
Moving.

16.02.2014 10:19, Alex Dumchus:

Vasily, submitting a pic as I promised. I think it looks similar to Antheraea assamensis

16.02.2014 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

16.02.2014 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Grounds:
1) http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/140-Euthalia/Euthalia-aconthea
2) http://michibikuhikari.blogspot.ru/2012/09/doubutsu-no-kuni.html (scroll down).

16.02.2014 9:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthalia aconthea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.02.2014 9:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time to get to the species :)

16.02.2014 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Would be great to see the location........

16.02.2014 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subacronicta megacephala? Should there be like, but I'll pass on DV.

16.02.2014 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bastilla fulvotaenia / Confidently identified / Yusri Syam.

16.02.2014 7:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well this was already IDed: http://www.fobi.web.id/fbi/v/lepido/f-noc/bas-ful/Bastilla-fulvotaenia_Pasirpengaraian_YS.jpg.html :)
Moving.

16.02.2014 6:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What for? Although I contact him today. You can in fact write the label if the data is there for it (as done in this butterfly).

16.02.2014 6:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plusia festucae / Evgeny Komarov Plusia putnami / Sergei Kotov.

16.02.2014 2:13, Sergei Kotov:

But this butterfly, if you follow the features shown Oleg Pekarsky, should be attributed toPlusia putnami

16.02.2014 1:13, Peter Khramov:

There is such a thing. From section chudesatee miracles. But all right, I must just time for inspiration, on the forehead - for the time being in any way.

16.02.2014 1:10, Peter Khramov:

Note is taken with respect to finance, but it is; -)

16.02.2014 1:07, Peter Khramov:

Concerning the wills of comments in the system area.

16.02.2014 1:06, Peter Khramov:

With regard to the postponement of comments nepoyavlyayuschihsya - please pay attention to whether they will appear (disappear can not), unless a comment, see what is prescribed instead of the "updated data". And potestit Now, everything should be OK.

16.02.2014 0:57, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you suggested at the event Alexey zaregatsya, still it will need for the system of reference collections, and even then it will be possible to affix the author's definition.

16.02.2014 0:54, Peter Khramov:

One of the champions: -)

15.02.2014 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Male Dysphania transducta / Confidently identified / Imago / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 23:18, Igor Ivannikov:

Well, Vasily, I uchtu your comments, and take away the question marks. Thank you for your view definition.

15.02.2014 23:13, Igor Ivannikov: This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2014 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tagiades japetus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias libythea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias libythea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias lyncida / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias libythea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias nero / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometra glaucaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2014 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Opinions about the same glaucaria /

15.02.2014 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It was in the admin as the infinitive, and in the name of the species were a few question marks, so get an author photo. That same situation if the author boot neoprene. kind of rearrange daw "just-inaccurate".

15.02.2014 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Igor Ivannikov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to associate the group with photo # 27632 if one individual.

15.02.2014 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Imago Appias olferna / Male.

15.02.2014 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Igor, I've already said that we should not touch it when jackdaws kind of uncertainty. And do not write anything in the name of a species. No question marks, etc.

15.02.2014 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, that means that a good number 1039, it made a mistake in 1049, here in 1139 again made a mistake :)

15.02.2014 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Imago / Igor Ivannikov Appias olferna / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Once this is Timothy cease all run up? :)

15.02.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Timothy xeIslYKIvPWtJFxOtTr Eddy Verfaillie.

15.02.2014 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plusia putnami / Vlad Proklov Plusia festucae / Timothy xeIslYKIvPWtJFxOtTr.

15.02.2014 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Four opinions (including mine) are the same and it willy-nilly, says for the transfer. Frankly embarrassed that defined Vlad, whose definition is almost always does not cause problems. I stand still ....

15.02.2014 21:07, Sergei Kotov:

Anyone can make mistakes, including Vlad Proklov. I also think that at this photo Plusia festucae. Look at the forum molbiol.ru the topic "Defining butterflies" message URL # 16710 (335 page). There Oleg Baking (barko) demonstrated how you can easily determine the types Plusia festucae / putnami appearance.

15.02.2014 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, do not rush to carry, for me it's really festucae, ask again Vlad. this butterfly among putnami not look :)

15.02.2014 17:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plusia festucae / Eddy Verfaillie Plusia putnami / Vlad Proklov.

15.02.2014 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, actually, Vlad rights. It putnami. Something I'm overworked and head cooks is not :)

15.02.2014 17:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, you are the same to me this document and sent a year ago :)

15.02.2014 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Plusia putnami / Andrey Ponomarev Plusia festucae / Eddy Verfaillie.

15.02.2014 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it, I drag to festucae. If you have questions: I send to e-mail a document with the bases :)

15.02.2014 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apparently coincided :) I even like a couple of kinds of prepared for iilyustrirovaniyu :)

15.02.2014 16:21, Peter Khramov:

Duc illustrated all too today ...

15.02.2014 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alpenus investigatorum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Alpenus investigatorum / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera tripunctaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera tripunctaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This butterfly is taken mark: "700 pictures" . Uff ...
Nothing more to spread today, I will not :)

15.02.2014 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter illustrates views. It seems, as one in the family. Do not be confused with anyone. Premiere will, however .....
P.S. There I have 4 more new species threw today :)

15.02.2014 13:08, Peter Khramov:

Password Vasily sent. And from the comments and the truth the situation is unclear. Miracles.

15.02.2014 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Antheraea jana Antheraea platessa.

15.02.2014 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Antheraea jana Antheraea platessa.

15.02.2014 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.02.2014 8:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The second photo on the network will, however. The first on-demand at the bottom here: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-18/plate9.php

15.02.2014 5:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria lunata / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.02.2014 5:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The Red Book of the Ivanovo region in 2007 (Vol.1 "Animals"): http://rghost.ru/52433340

15.02.2014 5:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The Red Book of the USSR in 1984: http://rghost.ru/52433241
The Red Book of the Voronezh region in 2011 (v.2 "Animals"): http://rghost.ru/52433251

15.02.2014 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ptilodon capucina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.02.2014 2:15, Irina Nikulina:

Ptilodon capucina (Linnaeus, 1758)

14.02.2014 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The plans for this year Meshchora:Parnassius apollodemocratus subspecies is there for sure,Iphiclides podalirinusthere, caught himself, but missed; Gynaephora seleniticaI found caterpillars. Etc. etc ...... not to the tropics now :)

14.02.2014 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Calls ... Only now I'm not ready yet to this material: Ride to know yourself ....... And now soon season: Meshchora waiting for me and promises a lot of interesting finds this swampy region :) very promising ... ...

14.02.2014 19:45, Peter Khramov:

In the bath tube: -) You go with Alex, if he is still calling: -)

14.02.2014 19:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pandesma robusta / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Anacampsis blattariella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Coleophora deauratella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Phyllonorycter issikii / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:43, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pandesma robusta / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Culpinia diffusa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If variability, then it's truly amazing :)

14.02.2014 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Is this really leda?

14.02.2014 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it's from someone volnyanok. And even of the tribe Orgyiini the goose is likely. Sorry, then pass ....

14.02.2014 19:24, Anna Gerasimova:

Australian butterfly http://lepidoptera.butterflyhouse.com.au/

14.02.2014 19:23, Anna Gerasimova:

Read that tracks with four beams on the back - LYMANTRIIDAE

14.02.2014 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thought something right. Only here do not get any vacation to go. "Trumpet calls" as they say :) ...... permanently

14.02.2014 19:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Anacampsis blattariella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

14.02.2014 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

det. Vishnyakov AN: soprovodilovka have in it the same and caught (no person in the local authors list) was defined as the Antheraea youngi Watson, 1915 here in synonyms from assamensis worth. Here it and threw. Come on, Aleksanr uploads. Interesting it :)

14.02.2014 19:08, Alex Dumchus:

But he defined this? I has the same uncertain Malaysia. Over the weekend, I lay

14.02.2014 18:57, Peter Khramov:

Proper thought Basil, thank you!
I will not be gone for the time being, but now heavily buried in this topic http://lepidoptera.ru/community/21358, so I can slow down the answers and reaction to a request.

14.02.2014 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I'm just worn out with it myself honestly. Thank you for Vasily definition. And no matter how he searched for her-zero .Ekz. something in my collection is worth :)

14.02.2014 18:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I suffered, Sergienko called and said that in the view of. He forgot the password and when detects ringing and I transfer photos to the species. I'm talking about something that has disappeared or were recording the transfer, as it was before.

14.02.2014 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I'm about the same :)

14.02.2014 18:01, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2014 17:42, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. Linnean types go? Although beautiful :)))

14.02.2014 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily I try not to define Saturn is worse than a bunch of pictures :) hawk moths, and do not always correspond. Thanks for the answer, I just want to embed the view from the source on what it determines that, there were no misunderstandings.

14.02.2014 17:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

And what happened to koment to transfer photos to the form?

14.02.2014 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, a great source of Saturn: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/ Moreover, it has long been on the list of literature is.

14.02.2014 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Automeris midea.

14.02.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Automeris themis.

14.02.2014 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergey, 6cm roughly. Any guesses? The label is 100% reliable. Digged out all the we, no chance... Nearly went on vacation :(

14.02.2014 15:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexandr, in cases you identify your specimens with the help of special literature or websites, please note them here to get the catalogization simpler.

14.02.2014 15:46, Sergei Kotov:

Vasily, what's its wingspan?

14.02.2014 15:28, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris midea

14.02.2014 15:27, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris themis

14.02.2014 14:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree, these are two moths of the same genus. After petasitis won't be surprised if this is really Polia bombycina :)

14.02.2014 13:40, Sergei Kotov:

Here's another similar http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13993

14.02.2014 13:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ellida viridimixta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotodonta leucodera / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.02.2014 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'd prefer A.Schintlmeister, 2008 Allodonta (Hexafrenum) leucodera (Staudinger, 1892), though still we'll move according to Synev otherwise this will be lack in the region. By the way, the description year should be corrected.

14.02.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

When identifying by pic, mistakes can be done, all we're doing here is just share our suppositions about species, the more approximate the more similar and close in colour species are. I have a great respect to Matov, still identifying by pics gives just a supposition about species, and that's basically good. Moved. Doubts kept though :)

14.02.2014 12:50, Irina Nikulina:

Geometra glaucaria Menetries, 1859 ? (Some doubts between glaucaria and dieckmanni)

14.02.2014 12:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypena stygiana / Irina Nikulina Hypena nigrobasalis / Yuri Semejkin.

14.02.2014 12:43, Irina Nikulina:

Here I give two IDs: Epinotodonta leucodera (Staudinger, 1887) (according to Synev), and Hexafrenum leucodera (Staudinger, 1892) — jpmoth.org and other websites. Giving both as our website has both. Need to decide where to move.

14.02.2014 12:42, Irina Nikulina:

Ellida viridimixta (Bremer, 1861)

14.02.2014 12:40, Irina Nikulina:

Culpinia diffusa (Walker, 1861)

14.02.2014 12:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr, the ID was done by pic. What confuses you?. I know that Kononenko is known as a best in Far Eastern noctuids and I keep in touch with him, though not regularly as he's often out of the city. If you do want, I'll give him this pic as he's back here, hopefully he'll reply. What's so confusing in Matov's ID? He knows the region quite well and often collaborates with Kononenko. Once ago some pro in your Western noctuids wrote me that Matov was one of the best experts here.

14.02.2014 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, did he identify by photo? One more question, you've got in Vladivostok a pro in Siberian noctuids, Vladimir Kononenko, why don't you ask him for help? I've just checked his book where both two species are described, feeling confused, can't choose by pics. The species are similar, alive moths though look kinda different. If no chance to ask Kononenko, we'll move.

14.02.2014 8:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Hypena nigrobasalis (Heiz). Identified by A. Y. Matov, Zoological Institute RAS.

14.02.2014 2:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually I made the subject since going to disappear from the site for some time for personal reasons. And being the moderator can not talk about without notice.
In general, I think that this topic is needed, in order to each other do not be puzzled: "Where did the man?"
Now it is necessary to me, and later someone else needed :)

13.02.2014 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, the pattern looks quite similar, no specific dark areas along the outer band, quite rare though. Other polia don't fit, will wait more, will check and look for. Lots in Far East yet undiscovered :)

13.02.2014 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Imho doesn't look like one. Yet huge variability............
Regions should be checked. Now can do nothing with my cell phone, alas.....

13.02.2014 19:18, Sergei Kotov:

Definitely not.
Consider Polia bombycina?

13.02.2014 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis crassestrigata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 18:47, Irina Nikulina:

Checked again all 4 species in Nizhnee Priamurye, still think this is Hypomecis crassestrigata. If the previous link isn't confirming enough, here's another just in case http://blog.daum.net/squirrel56/8716596

13.02.2014 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cleora cinctaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

13.02.2014 18:16, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably this is Cleora cinctaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775). There's another species insolita in Far East (in this region), yet doesn't fit (http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Cleora_insolita.html), nor leucophaea (Primorye).

13.02.2014 14:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Wishing for Far East )

13.02.2014 13:55, Irina Nikulina:

Bravo! Yesterday I finally found which species was a closest to serpentata (read in A. P. Burnasheva's theses "Fauna and ecology of geometrid in Central and Southwest Yakutia", tried to find on the web that dohlmanni)

13.02.2014 13:51, Irina Nikulina:

Even more fun for me)))

13.02.2014 13:50, Irina Nikulina:

Thanks) Copypasted from somewhere, didn't have a look))

13.02.2014 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

1039 :)

13.02.2014 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who's this Timothy? Funny :)

13.02.2014 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thanks, no doubts anymore. Indeed there are some typos in species names causing wrong search. The more we work with the website, the less mistakes left. Only Petr should correct them in due time, not to forget :).

13.02.2014 13:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, you made mistake in the species name. :) No "C" in Deileptenia mandschuriСaria. :)

13.02.2014 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deileptenia mandschuriaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 13:29, Irina Nikulina:

This is as well most likely Deileptenia mandschuricaria, dark bands of this species are way different by contrast.

13.02.2014 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maybe the first image on the web. Some authors consider this as an Eastern subspecies of Idaea serpentata. Synev described the species.

13.02.2014 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea dohlmanni / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

13.02.2014 13:22, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, there are plenty of Amphipyra schrenсkii, here are a couple of links:
http://olegberlov.narod.ru/noc101.html
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bettaman/6059391716/.
Just this website has a wrong double with a species named schrenkii without "C", you might have checked that one instead.

13.02.2014 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Timothy xeIslYKIvPWtJFxOtTr Deileptenia mandschuriaria / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 13:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Timothy xeIslYKIvPWtJFxOtTr.

13.02.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

13.02.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

I should have mentioned that the ID wasn't precise, though according to the last revision in 2011 there are only two species of this farinata species group in this location. Nearly no images on the web. So I choose this one. Tentatively identified still.

13.02.2014 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lithostege palaestinensis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.02.2014 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can't check today sadly :(

13.02.2014 11:54, Irina Nikulina:

Maybe Deileptenia mandschuricaria?

13.02.2014 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pangrapta vasava / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 11:27, Irina Nikulina:

Pangrapta vasava (Butler, 1881)

13.02.2014 9:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Apamea? Lots of them there :)

13.02.2014 9:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alas, common Amphipyra pyramidea, as I see, there's another species which image I didn't find, Amphipyra schrenkii. The rest are quite different :), Vasily, thanks!

13.02.2014 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra pyramidea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.02.2014 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips xylosteana / Tentatively identified / Imago Archips oporana / Confidently identified / Male.

13.02.2014 9:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips xylosteana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.02.2014 9:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Figures in the main do not match the numbers that gives the search.
For example species with a photo and the total number of species.

13.02.2014 4:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hint: Amphipyra sp. probably :)

13.02.2014 4:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While in the "piggy bank" Ecological Bulletin of Chuvash Republic Vol. 59 - Cheboksary 2007: "Rare butterfly Chuvash Republic": http://rghost.ru/52395169

13.02.2014 3:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I like some spacecraft have more regional in "bins Motherland". Tomorrow, as I get home leave here. I think will be useful :)

13.02.2014 1:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

13.02.2014 0:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

It seems to me, the definition of a photo anyone not offended when corrected, can be no doubt, there may be errors on either side, when there is a very good business disskusiya. and usually born truth (as it may be). Far East, for me, the dark forest, Kononenko and www.jpmoth.org to help me.:) And the definition of the photos ?, I justify all who do it, wrong everything. :) Need to be error-tolerant. truth will prevail :)

13.02.2014 0:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Will wait, doesn't fit well so far. :)

13.02.2014 0:23, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander completely! Agree about the difficulties of determining the photo and of course, about the "everyone can make mistakes")! (Just today, you corrected me again)) I'm not in any way want to point out a mistake, just saw the photo hanging in the debate, but even then you did not mind the definition of haze.

13.02.2014 0:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea terpnaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 0:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmia camptostigma / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.02.2014 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cosmia camptostigma / Alexandr Zhakov Cosmia unicolor / Yuri Semejkin.

13.02.2014 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cosmia camptostigma / Alexandr Zhakov Cosmia unicolor / Yuri Semejkin.

13.02.2014 0:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cosmia camptostigma / Alexandr Zhakov Cosmia unicolor / Yuri Semejkin.

13.02.2014 0:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, everyone can make mistakes, I am very often determined by online resources, and there, too, there is always the possibility of error. As he wrote, I also appeal to the mat, for help in determining Dumb complex species. But we should always remember that the definition is on the photos . Other, when the matter is determined by copies.in hand, you can see the lower wings, the back side is visible size can be welded. I was a year ago was not opposed to the transfer. Now I bear itself :). And at the moment to accept a particular mats.

13.02.2014 0:04, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea terpnaria (Prout, 1913)

12.02.2014 23:14, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander, there was such a long discussion not on the particular photo, it seems to me, it has been forgotten that gave her a start) A imenno- doubt in determining the residence foto.Ya think there really Cosmia unicolor, instead camptostigma. Revised weight Cosmia with Asian sites, determining the current http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27550. If you need to, then I'll write links.

12.02.2014 23:02, Irina Nikulina:

Cosmia camptostigma (Menetries, 1859)

12.02.2014 22:29, Peter Khramov:

Their site has a current version in a convenient form; -) But thanks anyway. With geo-component of some Achtung. How many artists had too much, no one do not moget. Like money and I do not regret it, but still. They can not. Straight bewitched challenge any turns.

12.02.2014 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

CITES in 2011 for racing (maybe useful): http://rghost.ru/52388597

12.02.2014 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immorata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 20:07, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, I think you're right, this is immorata. There are about 30 Scopula species in Far East, more than a half of which are Far Eastern endemics, nothing else similar to tessellaria or immorata there.

12.02.2014 19:41, Irina Nikulina:

I'd say right away this is Idaea serpentata... if ignore the location) Have no idea what else can be so similar but serpentata.

12.02.2014 17:49, Olga Averyanova:

Yes, I am about traps - without lamps, the screen itself

12.02.2014 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Scopula immorata perhaps?

12.02.2014 14:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Quite similar to Scopula tessellaria, what's its local version there?

12.02.2014 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthomantis cornelia / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Same here though these two species seem to be as variable as our local defoliaria........ Here genitalia exam could dot all the i's. Let it be jacobsoni :)

12.02.2014 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eurois occulta.

12.02.2014 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 13:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurois occulta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 13:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Golda has straight medial band whilst jacobsoni does curved. :) I believe.

12.02.2014 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erannis jacobsoni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2014 13:33, Irina Nikulina:

Polia nebulosa?

12.02.2014 13:31, Irina Nikulina:

Polia nebulosa?

12.02.2014 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

I know both these species and would choose Hydraecia micacea without doubt as a European Hydraecia petasitis is quite a different moth, subspecies in Far East is quite entangling:) Anyway petasitis is way bigger. Will think further.

12.02.2014 12:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea auricruda / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2014 12:34, Irina Nikulina:

Idaea auricruda (Butler, 1879)

12.02.2014 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

12.02.2014 12:03, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, I think it is ( http://catocala.narod.ru/noc231.html ) And way fresher than mine. A bit confusing that there is a similar micacea in this region which I know poor, didn't meet in nature (it's out in Primorye), should check this as well.

12.02.2014 11:51, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, have you checked Erannis jacobsoni? There was a publication amidst Kurentsov's works on the mass reproduction of Erannis jacobsoni in Khabarovsk region... http://sakhalinmuseum.ru/research_4_5.php (should look for other images of this, not sure there's no mess, there was a discussion on molbiol.ru on the distinctive features of these two species, check there)

12.02.2014 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Another specimen, species is the same :)

12.02.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way, is it the same specimen as #27539? Doubts.......

12.02.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacronicta caliginea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2014 8:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Erannis golda ?

12.02.2014 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

According to Synev this is Erannis defoliaria areal. Well could be its male indeed :) Far East though...

12.02.2014 2:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, is it another Hydraecia petasitis?

12.02.2014 2:07, Peter Khramov:

Attention Far Eastern diaspora: there exists Belyaev EA, Yermolaev VP Kirpichnikova VA et al. Butterflies - pests of agriculture and forestry of the Far East. Determinant. Vladivostok: Far Eastern Branch of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1988. http://lepstore.ru/catalog/1736. There is a feeling that the sensible thing. If it is necessary for you - anything for a candy bar.

12.02.2014 2:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacronicta caliginea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.02.2014 2:05, Peter Khramov:

Aah, Shamil, you're talking about the trap ...: -) I thought you all about the pin with handles for nets.

12.02.2014 1:59, Irina Nikulina:

Anacronicta caliginea (Butler, 1881).

12.02.2014 1:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyssia cavernosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 1:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais io / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.02.2014 1:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa cardui / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.02.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.02.2014 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

11.02.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.02.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

11.02.2014 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

11.02.2014 22:40, Irina Nikulina:

Female

11.02.2014 22:26, Shamil Murtazin:

The red book is interesting. I have nothing at all dried. And two of them - the Red Bashkiria. And both are taken after hitting a windshield: birch moth and swallowtail.
According to the general concept would be desirable that this initiative is not confusing "not local". To click on the pictures does not take a person somewhere in the wilds of someone's collection (figuratively).And so I like to see geo-component =)

11.02.2014 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea crenata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.02.2014 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea crenata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

11.02.2014 13:43, Irina Nikulina:

Apamea crenata (Hufnagel, 1766)

11.02.2014 13:42, Irina Nikulina:

Apamea crenata (Hufnagel, 1766)

11.02.2014 13:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna opaca / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.02.2014 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria monacha / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.02.2014 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So moving there considering its variability.

11.02.2014 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Calliteara pseudabietis / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

11.02.2014 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gortyna basalipunctata / Tentatively identified Gortyna fortis / Confidently identified.

11.02.2014 11:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Calliteara pseudabietis / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

11.02.2014 11:25, Irina Nikulina:

Same Caliteara pseudabietis

11.02.2014 11:24, Irina Nikulina:

Variable Calliteara pseudabietis ) I think

11.02.2014 11:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrrhia umbra / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.02.2014 11:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gortyna basalipunctata / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

11.02.2014 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In short: pitshet that the data are updated, but nothing in fact does not change. The newly loaded Fota remains in the same place and under its number, which is assigned when loading the site.

11.02.2014 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bet on Lymantria monacha male :)

11.02.2014 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caliteara sp.

11.02.2014 9:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caliteara sp.

11.02.2014 8:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Supposedly Pyrrhia umbra ?

11.02.2014 7:24, Shamil Murtazin:

End of February, yes. But you want to know that all is well there you have the design and collection of test specimens :)

10.02.2014 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, we're with you agreed at the end of February roughly like: -) Olga, and you about what - about the trap?

10.02.2014 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Looking everywhere, finally opted Antheraea frithi. Please google and see how variable it is (there are few more similar variations) :)
Guys, what's your thoughts?

10.02.2014 20:30, Olga Averyanova:

I wonder how - I myself handle curves, and local craftsmen, and even more so is unable to ... I want to have

10.02.2014 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Generally it does not change (even in his own LC.

10.02.2014 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Calliteara pseudabietis / Confidently identified / Female / Irina Nikulina.

10.02.2014 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agree with Irina basing on Far East. This is most likely Calliteara pseudabietis female: http://www.jpmoth.org/Lymantriidae/Calliteara_pseudabietis.html
besides these two species have no distinctions in appearance according to the actual data. Genitalia only: "Calliteara pudibunda (Linnaeus, 1758) and Calliteara pseudabietis Butler, 1885 distinctive features in the outer morphology and genitalia structures were proved with molecular researches" (The "Eversmannia" magazine, vol. 31—32, 2012 http://eversmannia.entomology.ru/31-32.htm

10.02.2014 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

10.02.2014 15:06, Irina Nikulina:

Probably Calliteara pseudabietis? Due to Far East) pudibunda seems to be distributed in Primorye only... according to Synev)

10.02.2014 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Addition: female.

10.02.2014 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caliteara pudibunda ? Quite a one. This is Far East though.

10.02.2014 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tethea or / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.02.2014 13:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dendrolimus superans / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.02.2014 13:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dendrolimus superans / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.02.2014 13:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia nebulosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.02.2014 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Moma alpium / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.02.2014 11:48, Irina Nikulina:

Well Asian websites describe this as an individual species amurensis) East is a delicate matter :) Far East as well :)

10.02.2014 3:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looks quite different from European guys :)

10.02.2014 3:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysoteuchia culmella Crambus pascuella.

10.02.2014 3:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysoteuchia culmella / Petr Khramov Agriphila straminella / Eddy Verfaillie.

10.02.2014 3:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysoteuchia culmella / Petr Khramov Agriphila straminella / Eddy Verfaillie.

10.02.2014 3:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysoteuchia culmella / Petr Khramov Agriphila straminella / Eddy Verfaillie.

10.02.2014 3:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chrysoteuchia culmella / Vitaly Gumenuk Agriphila straminella / Eddy Verfaillie.

09.02.2014 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow and potestit (otpishu here). Thank you!

09.02.2014 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thanks for the hint. Tomorrow will be back home and first check those )

09.02.2014 19:56, Peter Khramov:

Anyone please confirm?..

09.02.2014 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Well done.

09.02.2014 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Fixed a bug Fautua and in the office. Potestit as to what will be.

09.02.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.02.2014 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nymphalis polychloros / Roger Dolorosa Aglais urticae / Sergei Kotov.

09.02.2014 14:07, Sergei Kotov:

This is not Nymphalis polychloros. This is Aglais urticae.

09.02.2014 12:29, Irina Nikulina:

Quite probably Antheraea moultoni. Vasily also please check celebensis and jana when you can. All are variable)

09.02.2014 11:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Antheraea sp. Should google it (I seem to have met it somewhere). Now sadly can't do myself :(

09.02.2014 6:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Half asleep put it wrong, sorry :)

09.02.2014 6:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Irina Nikulina.

09.02.2014 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Diarsia brunnea / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.02.2014 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems nothing more similar. Moving.

09.02.2014 4:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia almana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.02.2014 4:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia almana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

09.02.2014 4:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Such a blurred shot..... Yet I know this, so moving :)

09.02.2014 1:06, Irina Nikulina:

Also would like to add that many sources (for one eol.org and boldsystems.org) describe Hydraecia amurensis as an individual species different from H. petasitis. Here are all three of them http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=1703&

09.02.2014 0:40, Irina Nikulina:

There are three species in Primorye, H. mongoliensis (lighter and more yellow), H. ultima (stripes are darker) and this ssp. petasitis http://catocala.narod.ru/noc231.html
http://omflies.narod.ru/Species/petasitis.htm.
Anything confusing you, Alexandr?

09.02.2014 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paralebeda femorata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.02.2014 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Isn't there some another Hydraecia?

09.02.2014 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea straminata Idaea deversaria.

09.02.2014 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea straminata Idaea deversaria.

09.02.2014 0:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pasiphila rectangulata Gymnoscelis rufifasciata.

08.02.2014 23:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hydrelia sylvata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

08.02.2014 22:49, Irina Nikulina:

Diarsia brunnea (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)?

08.02.2014 21:39, Irina Nikulina:

Can it be Ectropis crepuscularia (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775)?
(Had also E. excellens in my mind ..?)

08.02.2014 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.02.2014 21:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhyparioides metelkana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

08.02.2014 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta alni / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.02.2014 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum amata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2014 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena stygiana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2014 20:18, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysorithrum amata Bremer & Grey, 1853

08.02.2014 20:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysorithrum flavomaculata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2014 20:01, Irina Nikulina:

Chrysorithrum flavomaculata (Bremer, 1861)

08.02.2014 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Evonima mandschuriana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2014 19:08, Irina Nikulina:

Evonima mandschuriana (Oberthür, 1880) http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/78_Nolidae/01_Nolinae/3393_Evonima_mandschuriana/Evonima%20mandschuriana.htm

08.02.2014 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia mandschuriae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2014 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypostrotia cinerea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2014 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Fentonia ocypete / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.02.2014 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta alni ?

08.02.2014 17:38, Irina Nikulina:

Cucullia mandschuriae Oberthur, 1884

08.02.2014 17:17, Irina Nikulina:

Hypostrotia cinerea

08.02.2014 17:17, Irina Nikulina:

http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/tohoku/syo/asahi/shasinkan/img/img_4979.jpg

08.02.2014 17:15, Irina Nikulina:

I think this is Bomolocha stygiana (Butler, 1878) http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Hypeninae/Bomolocha_stygiana.htmlhttp://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42atuba2.html
Here it's called Hypena most probably.

08.02.2014 17:11, Irina Nikulina:

Fentonia ocypete (Bremer, 1861)

08.02.2014 16:13, Shamil Murtazin:

we are waiting-waiting =)

08.02.2014 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Polygonia c-aureum Polygonia c-album.

08.02.2014 14:05, Irina Nikulina:

How come this beauty was moved to Polygonia c-aureum?) Seems my fault) Automatically, Far East then "golden") Please move to Polygonia c-album.

08.02.2014 12:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, just I'm quite poor in Scopariinae so doubt. :)

08.02.2014 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, jamb serious with this system. Now I try to replace Colias croceus in its LK and accidentally typed the wrong number: TSIFRRA wrong one. Instead of 4545 he scored 4595 and there you are: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4595 let in a strange LC easily. This is a self-should not be, and must be corrected if possible.

08.02.2014 0:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why not? Khrypan' is about 10km directly off Zheleznodorozhny town (nearly neighbours) and basistrigalis fly in masses to my balcony (quite common species). Felt sure to move.

08.02.2014 0:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not sure.

07.02.2014 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Psammotis pulveralis / Vitaly Gumenuk Sitochroa verticalis / Eddy Verfaillie.

07.02.2014 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pyrausta aurata / Vitaly Gumenuk Evergestis limbata / Eddy Verfaillie.

07.02.2014 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pyrausta falcatalis / Vitaly Gumenuk Pyrausta aurata / Eddy Verfaillie.

07.02.2014 23:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Scoparia ambigualis / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Scoparia basistrigalis / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

07.02.2014 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Grounds for moving: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Scoparia_Basistrigalis

07.02.2014 21:07, Eddy Verfaillie:

I think this is Scoparia basistrigalis.

07.02.2014 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aventiola pusilla / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.02.2014 20:52, Irina Nikulina:

Aventiola pusilla (Butler, 1879)

07.02.2014 20:46, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Pyrausta aurata. *

07.02.2014 20:28, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Evergestis limbata. *

07.02.2014 20:22, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Sitochroa verticalis. *

07.02.2014 20:15, Alexander Belousov:

Wingspan is 38mm.

07.02.2014 19:29, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Agriphila straminella.

07.02.2014 19:28, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Agriphila straminella. *

07.02.2014 19:28, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Agriphila straminella. *

07.02.2014 19:27, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Agriphila straminella. *

07.02.2014 19:26, Eddy Verfaillie:

Anyhow, it's not culmella. I think it is Crambus uliginosellus. *

07.02.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arcte modesta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.02.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arcte modesta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.02.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Blew... Finally "cracked" this :) Moving.

07.02.2014 18:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea foedata / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

07.02.2014 14:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

07.02.2014 14:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agriphila inquinatella Agriphila tolli.

07.02.2014 14:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phycitodes lacteella / Zoran Bozovic Phycitodes albatella / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.02.2014 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phycitodes lacteella Phycitodes albatella.

07.02.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not agree, I'm for Epiblema scutulana. More opinions needed.

07.02.2014 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leave it as it is.

07.02.2014 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sciota adelphella Sciota rhenella.

07.02.2014 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hedya nubiferana Endothenia gentianaeana.

07.02.2014 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hedya nubiferana Endothenia gentianaeana.

07.02.2014 11:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aplocera plagiata, mistake comment

07.02.2014 11:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

07.02.2014 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2014 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2014 11:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Falcaria lacertinaria / Vitaly Gumenuk Drepana falcataria / Kjeld Brem.

07.02.2014 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clearly not lacertinaria. Moving. Grounds: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Drepana_Falcataria

07.02.2014 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK, Peter, thank you! Already the "test": work is good :)

07.02.2014 10:35, Peter Khramov:

1. Portraits - is voluntary, of course. In most instances they will not, but some - are certain.
2. For sale / exchange - yes, most likely, have nothing to hide. All the more so for species from the Red Book and CITES will be impossible to affix a label on the sale / exchange - the program will keep track of this machine.The collection will be possible to bring and expose for sale - you can not.
3. allowed: -)
From oral reports yet it emerges the view that foty (unlike instances) can be put into a common pot, but let's see what else people will say here and molbiole.

07.02.2014 10:12, Alexander Belousov:

Just a thought.
1- Most collections have a large serial fees. It is as necessary "portraits", in the case of each copy.
2- In terms of the sale, exchange, there is no sense to hide anything. Well, if the current Red Book.
3- Any collector just raving, as if all his wealth hvastanut.

07.02.2014 0:48, Kjeld Brem:

Hello Vitaly.
I would rather say, that this larva is Drepana falcataria - with the stribes in the head, the green side and the darkbrown Dorsal.

http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/8303

The kindest greetings from Kjeld - Denmark :-)

07.02.2014 0:31, Peter Khramov:

We are working to create a section on the site where anyone can keep track of your collection of butterflies.The program serves this section allows to enter data about instances in the collection, synchronize them with a system of taxa on the site, to exchange data with each other, to look for items in other collections to share, display items for exchange or sale, as well as open access to information about collection of all the users,Only some or close it altogether.
The main advantages of online programs to the off-line options - no need to drive a system of species and taxa supra plus the ability to communicate with users and sync not only with the base taxa, but also with pictures, and in the future - and the cards on the site.In this topic, I will ask questions, how to make better and more convenient, and report the results, at what stage is this development.At the moment, there are three questions:

- there are some codes to indicate the straightened / neraspravlenny instance?
- If you have someone full list of options for the status of copies in collections (A1, A, A2, etc.)
- Do I need to hide foty copies?
For example, the situation - people introduced copies of data labeled "not show anyone." Accordingly, the data of these originals are not shown to anyone.But photo copies, if any, can be used by me or Moderov site to illustrate the types and be available in the common photo gallery (not all, and for manually selecting moderators are usually if illustrations for this type little or no ).Thus under fotami always put the signature (and even implanted in the image itself) about the author of the picture. According to the author of the image of dried butterfly can assume that he is the owner of the instance, although this is not always the case (for example, I dried attendants there, but there are instances foty), but still.Critical or not? Do afigenskaya 100% privacy or not?
ZY We could just make the curator of the collection can tag images that he did not want to see in the public gallery, but then have foty default all hide (ie,that they are not available on request from the share ph), and some of them only raspryatyvat that there is some gimor.
Zzy Again, we are talking about the photographs collection of copies, not the originals themselves of that, of itself, can be hidden if desired by one and all.


Ask to speak, someone that thinks about.Note: The Molbiole has a duplicate topic.

06.02.2014 23:55, Peter Khramov:

Basil is ready. Algorithm:
Loading fresh photos and is in LK photo, the image quality is better than the old. At the bottom of the edit window in the gray of the image you drive in a room of the old photos, the image on which is worse. Updating. As a result, on the page of an old photo (with his number, commentaries, etc.) Will display a new image and the page with a new image (ie, the new entity in the database ph) will be deleted. Thus on prevyuhe in LC can stay old image - it just took him out of the browser cache. When you upgrade all the rules will be.
ZY Lord, who still need such an opportunity - reportedly Share.Remember, the idea is to re-loadable image files, you can replace the old files of the same copies of the same angles (for the collection of butterflies) or exactly the same pictures, but better quality (for the field). Stupidly foty replace the same type of new - No way, you just need to load a new separately.

06.02.2014 22:24, Peter Khramov:

Guys please check the recent data on Zoran's photos (seen in comments), are IDs right?

06.02.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa transiens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.02.2014 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa transiens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

06.02.2014 20:58, Irina Nikulina:

Doubting between Idaea salutaria (Christoph, 1881) http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Sterrhinae/Idaea_salutaria.html and Idaea foedata http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Sterrhinae/Idaea_foedata.html Quite similar species... Incline to the latter.

06.02.2014 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tethea or / Evgeny Komarov Tethea ocularis / Eddy Verfaillie.

06.02.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Evgeny Komarov Eddy Verfaillie.

06.02.2014 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tethea or Tethea ocularis.

06.02.2014 16:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, the fact Synev doesn't mention that is not confusing, but there are a row of cons. By the way, P. porphyralis is mentioned in 38th region where is this pic from. :) Key to the insects of the Far East of the USSR describes Pyralis cespitalis Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775 in Primorye, European Yakutia, Zabaikalye, Middle Asia, Japan, Northeast China. This species name now serves as a P. despicata synonym. The Japanese website though doesn't mention any of these names whilst has Pyrausta neocespitalis Inoue, 1982 which fits one to one in appearance to our specimen http://jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Pyrausta_neocespitalis.html
I'll try to check what's distributed in Kahabarovsk region and what's the areal of the new species. As I see, this is Japanese. :)

06.02.2014 15:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, well P. porphyralis neither mentioned in 37th region (that's why I didn't move it right away). This is it http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27336 Habitus fits. Synev can't be taken as an axiom considering these mismatches.

06.02.2014 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aplocera efformata Aplocera plagiata.

06.02.2014 15:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elophila nymphaeata Anania coronata.

06.02.2014 15:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypomecis roboraria Ectropis crepuscularia.

06.02.2014 15:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agriphila latistria Agriphila tristella.

06.02.2014 15:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Catoptria falsella Chrysoteuchia culmella.

06.02.2014 15:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea aversata Idaea straminata.

06.02.2014 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euproctis chrysorrhoea Euproctis similis.

06.02.2014 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pyrausta despicata Pyrausta purpuralis.

06.02.2014 15:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aleimma loeflingiana Pandemis heparana.

06.02.2014 15:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra berbera Amphipyra pyramidea.

06.02.2014 15:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Enargia paleacea Mythimna vitellina.

06.02.2014 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sitochroa palealis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.02.2014 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ancylis laetana Epinotia nisella.

06.02.2014 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Orthosia gracilis Agrochola circellaris.

06.02.2014 14:16, Irina Nikulina:

Sitochroa palealis (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)?

06.02.2014 13:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Corgatha costimacula / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.02.2014 13:16, Zoran Bozovic:

Agrochola circellaris
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 13:15, Zoran Bozovic:

Epinotia nisella
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 13:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Fentonia ocypete / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

06.02.2014 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Diacrisia irene / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.02.2014 13:04, Zoran Bozovic:

Ectropis crepuscularia
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 13:02, Irina Nikulina:

Fentonia ocypete (Bremer, 1861)

06.02.2014 13:02, Zoran Bozovic:

Agriphila tristella
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 13:02, Irina Nikulina:

Corgatha costimacula (Staudinger, 1892)

06.02.2014 13:00, Zoran Bozovic:

Pandemis heparana
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 12:55, Zoran Bozovic:

Eupithecia absinthiata
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/

06.02.2014 12:54, Zoran Bozovic:

Phycitodes albatella
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 12:53, Zoran Bozovic:

Endothenia gentianaeana
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 12:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hurried, seems new species Pyrausta neocespitalis in Russia as Pyrausta despicata isn't mentioned in 37th region.

06.02.2014 12:43, Zoran Bozovic:

Ephestia elutella
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/

06.02.2014 12:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pyrausta despicata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov Not identified.

06.02.2014 12:42, Zoran Bozovic:

Amphipyra pyramidea
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 12:38, Zoran Bozovic:

Agriphila tolli
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 12:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrausta despicata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.02.2014 12:26, Zoran Bozovic:

Pyrausta purpuralis
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Earias pudicana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.02.2014 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Earias pudicana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

06.02.2014 12:19, Zoran Bozovic:

Notocelia incarnatana
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/

06.02.2014 12:15, Zoran Bozovic:

Aplocera plagiata
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 12:10, Zoran Bozovic:

Albatella reliquella
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/

06.02.2014 12:06, Zoran Bozovic:

Sciota rhenella
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 12:05, Zoran Bozovic:

Idaea deversaria
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:45, Zoran Bozovic:

Euproctis similis
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:44, Zoran Bozovic:

Anania coronata
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:43, Zoran Bozovic:

Chrysoteuchia culmella
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:41, Zoran Bozovic:

Endothenia gentianaeana
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:38, Zoran Bozovic:

Idaea straminata
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:32, Zoran Bozovic:

Gymnoscelis rufifasciata
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:27, Zoran Bozovic:

Mythimna vitellina
by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:22, Zoran Bozovic:

Phalonidia contractana by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:13, Zoran Bozovic:

Monopis crocicapitella by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

06.02.2014 11:10, Zoran Bozovic:

Aplocera plagiata by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/

06.02.2014 10:58, Zoran Bozovic:

Idaea deversaria by Jan Myšák from http://www.biolib.cz/cz/participate/ *

05.02.2014 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tethea or / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Not identified.

05.02.2014 20:19, Sergei Kotov:

This is not Tethea or. Some geometrid.

05.02.2014 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

05.02.2014 5:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let it be male.

04.02.2014 23:36, Irina Nikulina:

Male

04.02.2014 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil note: gallery More photos and new site for species growing in winter. The site lives and the people working on it. Much worse was if-he "died" before the summer :( A picture of habitats (as well as parasites) oh how needed if the site claims to be earnest and do not want to be just "show colored wings" of whom, and so the network is complete.

04.02.2014 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Abrostola triplasia / Vitaly Gumenuk Abrostola tripartita / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Abrostola triplasia / Zoran Bozovic Abrostola tripartita / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incarcha aporalis / Tentatively identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incarcha aporalis / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incarcha aporalis / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Incarcha aporalis / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oospila rufilimes / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oospila ciliaria / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tachyphyle albisparsa / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dichogama prognealis / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 20:37, Shamil Murtazin:

Actually, no parasites, as with habitats gallery grow. And that's fine.
Vasily correctly puts a lot of graphic and text information, and it formalizes Peter correctly when typed acceptable amount of the same type of information.More slightly and will come to enter Calculate instances when fishing, and only there to calculations the number of species in the area close))))

04.02.2014 20:36, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is ocularis? *

04.02.2014 20:36, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is ocularis. *

04.02.2014 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syngamilyta apicolor / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilomela perspicata / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Azochis trichotarsalis / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 20:19, Alexander Belousov:

Wingspan is 40mm

04.02.2014 20:02, Sergei Kotov:

Passport portrait :)

04.02.2014 19:49, Eddy Verfaillie:

I think this is festucae. *

04.02.2014 19:44, Alexander Belousov:

Ok, will do without rulers.

04.02.2014 19:41, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, if you could add photos without rulers and instead with comment note about size, would be really great.

04.02.2014 19:40, Peter Khramov:

There was a glitch when for comments to supraspecific taxa shows an illustration of these taxa are not, and others. Who will fly to both versions of the site.

04.02.2014 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well-to do (to put in a picture gallery and a deduced that fotoy to which is attached). The biotope is of great importance as you know yourself. And God forbid gaknut into oblivion "Yandex pictures" or something ...... And these landscapes will disappear. And everything is in one place to be: on the site.By the way: perhaps fifteen minutes while I was crawling on the sand itself, on his knees with his soap box to photograph her memories ....... :)

04.02.2014 19:14, Peter Khramov:

By the way, it is a good idea - to publish landscapes. Perhaps it is somehow optimized? For example, to ship them as usual pictures in the gallery, but only display the pages of photons, to which they belong? Or even once?

04.02.2014 19:07, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is tripartita. *

04.02.2014 19:06, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is tripartita. *

04.02.2014 18:04, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is impossible. Orthosia gracilis, as all Orthosia, is a species of the spring. *

04.02.2014 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I place a photo of the biotope, where it was photographed this butterfly.
The sandy slope on the river Nerskaya River (env. Seed orchards near the railway station LMC "Nerskaya River"):

04.02.2014 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jodis lactearia / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is it: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Jodis_Lactearia
Moving.

04.02.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The addition to one of mine of Moscow region :) I supposed the species too, didn't risk though...

04.02.2014 16:41, Peter Khramov:

Ok, right now, just have to be interrupted with a program to maintain the collections, and the roof is already moving out of it. Soon you touched obnovlyalku.

04.02.2014 16:20, Eddy Verfaillie:

Azochis trichotarsalis *

04.02.2014 16:18, Eddy Verfaillie:

Spilomela perspicata *

04.02.2014 15:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyrausta porphyralis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2014 15:45, Eddy Verfaillie:

Syngamilyta apicolor *

04.02.2014 15:39, Eddy Verfaillie:

Dichogama prognealis

04.02.2014 15:06, Eddy Verfaillie:

Tachyphyle albisparsa *

04.02.2014 15:04, Eddy Verfaillie:

Oospila ciliaria *

04.02.2014 14:58, Eddy Verfaillie:

Oospila rufilimes extensata *

04.02.2014 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Thetidia chlorophyllaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2014 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria mathura / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

I was one second ahead :)

04.02.2014 13:57, Eddy Verfaillie:

Incarcha aporalis *

04.02.2014 13:53, Irina Nikulina:

Thetidia chlorophyllaria (Hedemann, 1879)

04.02.2014 13:51, Eddy Verfaillie:

Probably Incarcha aporalis *

04.02.2014 13:45, Eddy Verfaillie:

Incarcha aporalis *

04.02.2014 13:44, Eddy Verfaillie:

Incarcha aporalis *

04.02.2014 13:25, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, sorry, simultaneously)

04.02.2014 13:24, Irina Nikulina:

Parasiccia altaica (Lederer, 1855)

04.02.2014 13:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parasiccia altaica / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2014 13:19, Irina Nikulina:

Lymantria mathura aurora Butler, 1877 (this very subspecies is distributed in Far East. One remark, Synev says mathura is distributed in only one Primorye region, 40th, whilst turns out it can be also in 37th))

04.02.2014 13:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Family, subfamily?

04.02.2014 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mesoleuca albicillata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2014 13:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Meganola albula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2014 13:10, Irina Nikulina:

Mesoleuca albicillata

04.02.2014 13:06, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably Jodis lactearia (Linnaeus, 1758)

04.02.2014 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter podstegnu bit :) Do this thing. And that "overgrown" at all: now 600-plus photos and have the desire and the ability to ship on (Pts. Weighty collection is enriched in recent Exotics). To clean up the LC-sensitive.

04.02.2014 2:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phiaris palustrana / Tentatively identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 2:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiblema sticticana / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

04.02.2014 2:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Drasteria flexuosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.02.2014 1:36, Irina Nikulina:

No, Eddie, in Primorye only minimus and argiades. This is definitely one of the coastal species Celastrina.

04.02.2014 1:28, Irina Nikulina:

Looks quite similar to Japanese Apocleora rimosa (Butler, 1878)
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Apocleora_rimosa.html
http://mushinavi.com/navi-insect/data-ga_edasyaku_kurokumo.htm (more shots available)
Yet there is no such species in Far East according to Synev (I checked as well Сleora genus which has only three species in Far East (2 of them are in 37th region), no one fits.
Curious what's this species... Hope experts can help)

04.02.2014 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Habrosyne intermedia / Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Habrosyne dieckmanni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.02.2014 1:06, Irina Nikulina:

It is not intermedia, and Habrosyne dieckmanni

04.02.2014 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Census ...

04.02.2014 0:23, Peter Khramov:

Now you may read the Community feed with all the comments save the service ones (service comments cover info of moving pics, formalization of features and some other moderators' comments plus users' confirmations). This adjustment can be quite handy for those who opt to read the whole community feed and thus may have some useful comments lost amidst the service ones. For switching between the modes please use the proper link up above the community feed.

03.02.2014 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Fixed. Fedor, please comment the species (photo is a feature of a species) on the very species description page, not photo one. Anyway thanks for the hint.

03.02.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hurried. Synev describes the species without ssp., later we should solve this question, so far let's follow Synev :)

03.02.2014 22:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Peridea monetaria Peridea gigantea.

03.02.2014 22:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Peridea monetaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.02.2014 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Genus is right whilst the species we'll never know, I think :(

03.02.2014 21:31, Irina Nikulina:

Suppose Peridea gigantea Butler, 1877
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/75_Notodontidae/3138_Peridea/3139%20Peridea%20gigantea/Peridea%20gigantea.htm
Yet have a question: Japanese websites say that the species has monetaria ssp. in Far East which was also mentioned by P. Morozov on molbiol.ru ("Our moths belong to ssp. monetaria Oberthür, 1879 which is as well distributed in Northeast China, Korea and in Hokkaido island (Japan). V. V. Dubatolov describes monetaria Oberthür, 1879 as a gigantea synonym (http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lepidop/Notodon.htm). Synev whatsoever lacks monetaria. Here on this website we have individual species Peridea monetaria (Oberthür, 1879). So let's decide where to move the pic.

03.02.2014 21:00, Eddy Verfaillie:

Drasteria saisani *

03.02.2014 20:55, Eddy Verfaillie: This species is identified correctly.

03.02.2014 20:50, Eddy Verfaillie:

In my opinion, it looks more like a Cupido species. I think it is alcetas but I don't know if it flies in the Primorye region. *

03.02.2014 20:34, Eddy Verfaillie:

Phiaris palustrana *

03.02.2014 20:18, Eddy Verfaillie:

Epiblema sticticana *

03.02.2014 20:10, Eddy Verfaillie:

Adscita is for sure, but further on, genitalia examination is needed. *

03.02.2014 17:17, Peter Khramov:

Why it's ok.

03.02.2014 17:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Should it be cropped a bit?.. =)

03.02.2014 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.02.2014 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria monacha / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.02.2014 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is such a "nun"Lymantria monachais. I stand.

03.02.2014 15:45, Irina Nikulina:

Hypomecis too. Perhaps one of two Far Eastern subspecies of Hypomecis roboraria? (http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Hypomecis_roboraria_displicens.html)

03.02.2014 15:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chlorissa obliterata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.02.2014 15:36, Irina Nikulina:

Most likely Hypomecis crassestrigata (Christoph, 1881) http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Hypomecis_crassestrigata_crassestrigata.html

03.02.2014 14:09, Olga Averyanova:

Sure, on the right.

03.02.2014 13:59, Irina Nikulina:

Quite curious moth) This is Goniorhynchus, but the species... According to Synev, there is only one Goniorhynchus in Far East, Goniorhynchus explicatalis (Christoph, 1881). Yet there's rather recent publication by A. N. Streltsov, V. V. Dubatolov and A. M. Dolghikh called "New founds of Pyraloidea in Bolshehehtsirsky State Natural Reserve (near Khabarovsk) in 2008—2011 yy. (Amursky Zoological magazine 2012) explicatalis is described as a clausalis synonym and here's this remark: "This species known in local lepidopterological literature as Goniorhynchus explicatalis (Christoph, 1881) was described by G. Christoph as Botys explicatalis. H. Inoue while revising typical material of G. Christoph established that was Mecyna gracilis
(Butler, 1879) synonym whilst Goniorhynchus Hampson, 1896 distributed in Russia should have been called as Goniorhynchus clausalis (Christoph, 1881)".
Here's the link to clausalis - http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Goniorhynchus_clausalis.html

03.02.2014 13:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Accepted: D

03.02.2014 13:06, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Please correct this pic also illlustrates Eulithis populata which is wrong.

03.02.2014 12:45, Olga Averyanova:

:) oh a counter offer - there is always a clutch (for butterfly park functions), but does not have the equipment and skills to use it - if you pass by the southern Cambodia - welcome!

03.02.2014 12:20, Irina Nikulina:

Chlorissa obliterata (Walker, [1863])

03.02.2014 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Syntomis germana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.02.2014 11:35, Irina Nikulina:

He is the (only 2 species in the Russian Far East, in the south of second- Kurilkih Islands lives). On the territory of the Russian Far East - a subspecies genzana Matsumura, 1927

03.02.2014 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Syntomis germana ?

03.02.2014 0:19, Irina Nikulina:

Probably Sineugraphe exusta (Butler, 1878)? http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Noctuinae/Sineugraphe_exusta.html

03.02.2014 0:16, Irina Nikulina:

Could be Gazoryctra macilentus (Eversmann, 1851)? (= spinifera Tshistjakov, 1996). (or Gazoryctra ganna, doubt between these two)

02.02.2014 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cucullia umbratica / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

02.02.2014 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While there is this feature, I add here photo of its biotope.
Biotope of this species is thinned pine plantings with some rare raspberries which had larvae concentrated in them.

02.02.2014 22:10, Sergei Kotov:

Also some weirdo.

02.02.2014 22:09, Sergei Kotov:

This pic should be moved back from here, to not identified at least as it's definitely not umbratica.

02.02.2014 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Kirinia epaminondas / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

02.02.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree with Irene: http://szmn.sbras.ru/picts/butterfly/Satyridae/Kirinia_epaminondas.htm
I stand.

02.02.2014 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eulithis populata / Vitaly Gumenuk Eulithis mellinata / Fyodor Pudovikov.

02.02.2014 21:36, Fyodor Pudovikov:

This is Eulithis mellinata

02.02.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's definitely notAphantopus hyperantus

02.02.2014 20:22, Irina Nikulina:

In my opinion, Ure, it is one of your two Kirinia, most likely male Kirinia epaminondas

02.02.2014 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glanycus coendersi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.02.2014 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glanycus coendersi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.02.2014 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, I see the ID is correct. Only this species has such outer margin whilst two others have a narrow dark sripe between the white band and the curved outer band. Here it's wide instead :)

02.02.2014 15:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Evergestis junctalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 15:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Is intermedia right? There should be three species (so moved to tentatively identified so far).

02.02.2014 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Alexandr Zhakov Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.02.2014 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, sorry, I will back it up as it was before in a sec. :)

02.02.2014 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.02.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Habrosyne intermedia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.02.2014 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What a beauty! So me too took my part in Far East ones :)

02.02.2014 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stauropus fagi / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 15:30, Svetlana Shchavelina:

:) Blur... Aesthetics... Photoshop rules :) ACDSee has some special button, I tried that two years ago, quickly got fed up, also didn't see where to use such thing.

02.02.2014 15:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Shaka atrovittatus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ellida viridimixta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 15:15, Peter Khramov:

What's this effect edges always blurred?

02.02.2014 15:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala fraxini / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dimorphicosmia variegata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxytripia orbiculosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia splendens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 14:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia jankowskii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

02.02.2014 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphelia ferugana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.02.2014 13:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Aphantopus hyperantus

02.02.2014 10:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.02.2014 10:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

02.02.2014 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.02.2014 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

02.02.2014 4:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.02.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.02.2014 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.02.2014 1:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idea leuconoe / Confidently identified / Roger Dolorosa.

02.02.2014 0:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Idea leuconoe

01.02.2014 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yep, this pic added to few forums, I think no chance.

01.02.2014 20:27, Peter Khramov:

Vladimir, please refrain from uploading pics with any marks in them.

01.02.2014 20:09, Peter Khramov:

Good looking.

01.02.2014 20:09, Peter Khramov:

You mean not identifiable?

01.02.2014 17:42, Igor Ivannikov:

The collection year is noted correctly.

01.02.2014 16:49, Igor Ivannikov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melapia electaria / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 14:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta digna / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta vulpina / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeaaaaaah

01.02.2014 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta digna / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia fuchsiana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 13:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mythimna flavostigma / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could someone check this? Rather huge and bright critter, can't find it anywhere..... Nolidae? Notodontidae? Anyone knows? Therefore uploaded here.....

01.02.2014 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dolbina tancrei / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So Notodontidae...... Myself I added here three Notodontidae from Moscow region, had no idea........... Shame on me :(
Wasted half yesterday to find.....

01.02.2014 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.02.2014 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

01.02.2014 13:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

01.02.2014 13:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thanks! Yury, you directed me right with "bifurcated tail", then just checked Japanese website.... :)

01.02.2014 13:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Trichobaptria exsecuta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 12:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Yeah, skill detected!!! I was looking in differently other place...... In short, Alexandr is ace!!!

01.02.2014 12:35, Shamil Murtazin:

I just had some bug with a wrong date around first years of the 20th century...

01.02.2014 12:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dolbina tancrei / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, bravo! I was breaking my mind whilst this turned out to be Notodontidae...... Hat's off :)

01.02.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gonoclostera timoniorum / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 10:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why not? I for one have even prewar specimens in my collection. What's unusual? Entomology hasn't started today :)

01.02.2014 10:47, Shamil Murtazin:

The collection year noted right?..

01.02.2014 10:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena crassalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.02.2014 10:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Let's leave in Enarmonia formosana, definitely not Celypha lacunana.

01.02.2014 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phiaris umbrosana / Tentatively identified / Sergey Novitckiy.

31.01.2014 22:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pheosia rimosa / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 22:21, Irina Nikulina:

Pheosia rimosa Packard, 1864

31.01.2014 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, cleared that out.

31.01.2014 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Without genitalia did not elaborate. I put in inaccurate fucosa.

31.01.2014 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nemophora minimella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very suitable: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Nemophora_Minimella only grated it. I stand.

31.01.2014 20:54, Irina Nikulina:

Rather, it Nemophora minimella. Often we found in the suburbs.

31.01.2014 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paracolax tristalis / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

31.01.2014 20:44, Irina Nikulina:

Options are no more, this is the only type of its kind in the 36 region.

31.01.2014 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But it is only by Sinev 24m in the region, and this is not the MO, "Gorno-Altai region: Altai Republic" :)
Wait necessary .....

31.01.2014 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Similar: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Nemophora_Prodigellus obtrёpanaya only a few.

31.01.2014 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula subpunctaria / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

31.01.2014 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By Sineva is in the 36 and 37 regions (Amur region. Is 36). Stand: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Scopula_Subpunctaria

31.01.2014 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea rufaria / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

31.01.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Idaea_Rufaria

31.01.2014 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2014 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, please solve this group too :)

31.01.2014 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypolimnas misippus / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2014 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypolimnas misippus / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.01.2014 20:06, Peter Khramov:

It must confirm ...

31.01.2014 20:05, Peter Khramov:

Any thoughts on that please?

31.01.2014 20:04, Peter Khramov:

And again about DV. Tell me one thread that the thread ...

31.01.2014 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Any thoughts on this?

31.01.2014 20:04, Peter Khramov:

One thread confirm?

31.01.2014 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Yet there are options? Our foreign colleagues are usually not very well versed in the Russian Far East ...

31.01.2014 19:59, Peter Khramov:

Is it really this? Please anyone confirm.

31.01.2014 19:56, Irina Nikulina:

Here there is some doubt between the two species - in five living in the RFE. I would put all the same to Amphipoea fucosa (Freyer, 1830), but inaccurate, because there is a very similar type of Amphipoea ussuriensis (Petersen, 1914), in the 37th region, too frequent. Maybe someone will update ..?

31.01.2014 19:54, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, unleashed.

31.01.2014 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notodonta dembowskii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pelosia ramosula / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pelosia noctis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Peridea lativitta / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia goliath / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notodonta torva / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mabra charonialis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysaethria erasaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysaethria erasaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

31.01.2014 19:31, Irina Nikulina:

Notodonta dembowskii Oberthur, 1879

31.01.2014 19:30, Irina Nikulina:

Pelosia ramosula (Staudinger, 1887)

31.01.2014 19:29, Irina Nikulina:

Pelosia noctis (Butler, 1881)

31.01.2014 19:28, Irina Nikulina:

Peridea lativitta (Wileman, 1911)

31.01.2014 19:28, Irina Nikulina:

Polia goliath (Oberthur, 1880)

31.01.2014 19:26, Irina Nikulina:

Notodonta torva (Hubner, 1803)

31.01.2014 19:25, Irina Nikulina:

Mabra charonialis (Walker, 1859)

31.01.2014 19:23, Irina Nikulina:

Dysaethria erasaria (Christoph, 1881)

31.01.2014 19:23, Irina Nikulina:

Dysaethria erasaria (Christoph, 1881)

31.01.2014 18:45, Roger Dolorosa:

could this be Idea leuconoe? *

31.01.2014 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hypolimnas misippus male (distributed in the Philippines, will add the info now). Will wait with moving not to touch #27187 (there's this one too) before the whole weird group isn't get solved.

31.01.2014 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mmmm .... strongly, however :) Link in a "photo of one individual" Nymphalidae, tolstogolovku and Belyanko ...... Just some fantasy :) Peter, immediately untie this group ought :)

31.01.2014 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

31.01.2014 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male & female Imago.

31.01.2014 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

31.01.2014 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria dispar / Confidently identified / Female / Yuri Semejkin.

31.01.2014 14:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Lymantria dispar

31.01.2014 13:57, Zoran Bozovic:

Sorry, this is Celypha lacunana

31.01.2014 12:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Second day I've been trying to realize what's this? Seems dead or sick specimen. All this purplish is clearly secondary developing from the first tone. Considered bifurcated tail, didn't go.
Here's also third variant with a migrant. I checked all Far Eastern species including those might be as well found in Far East. Got 38 species in whole, nothing else. So the floor to experts. Want to know anyway what's this species.

31.01.2014 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.01.2014 11:30, Irina Nikulina:

Could be to confidently identified, there are only 2 species in Russian Far East, the second, yoshinoensis, though is in Prymorye only.

31.01.2014 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.01.2014 11:18, Irina Nikulina:

Could be to confidently identified, this is the only species of the genus in Far East.

31.01.2014 5:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Callambulyx tatarinovi / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.01.2014 5:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

31.01.2014 5:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Got it. I meant tentative ID would be better. :) Or it's the genus with only one species in the Philippines (can't check right now); however there are also Telicota and other similar. Imho, the group is quite tough.

31.01.2014 5:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Callambulyx tatarinovi Brem et Grey

31.01.2014 2:55, Vladimir Bobow:

Thanks! That's my old hobby.

30.01.2014 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Surely http://www.whatsthatbug.com/2013/01/19/palmking-from-malaysia/

30.01.2014 18:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amathusia phidippus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.01.2014 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A good site pierid group Delias : http://www.delias-butterflies.com/

30.01.2014 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Common species apparently (lots came from there). I believe you'll do :)

30.01.2014 16:20, Lev Bely:



Biologists wondered a lot why sloths known for their extraordinary inactivity came off trees... for a toilet procedures. Whilst these mysterious critters are evidently in more safe when staying atop rather then being down on the forest floor, once a week they still leave their secure monastery and descend on the floor. Some even have favourite trees to come again and again with their toilet needs.

Researchers varied in opinions on this “earth” ceremony. Guesses included fertilization of a favourite plant, getting minerals from the soil to enliven the ascetic vegetarian diet... No one was surely proved. The most likely is a surprise and gets to be more about moths than of sloths.

Jonathan Pauli, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, got a clue after watching a “Mouldy Sloth” documentary by BBCWorldwide where David Attenborough, naturalist and president of Butterfly Conservation, told about special sloth camouflage of algae infused in the sloth's fur. These algae change colour according to a season, turning green when it's rainy and the sloth kind of disappears in the surroundings, whilst during drought periods the algae dye out and so looks the sloth who gets nearly invisible and thus secured.

The sloth's fur is a whole miniature ecosystem and a habitat not only for algae but even moths. The animal can lodge about 120 species of moth at a time. Weirdly, sloths don't seem whatsoever disturbed or bothered, the opposite, Pauli thinks the insects originate the sloth’s odd toilet habits.

Jonathan Pauli studied three-toed sloths in their natural habitat in San José, Costa Rica, and noticed that when a sloth descended down on the forest floor for a toilet procedures, moths left the animal and laid eggs in the sloth's feces. Having hatched, the new moths got back into the sloth's fur and the new cycle started over.

Thus coming down sloth may support moths' lifecycle which in turn provide algae growth. Algae not only make up a perfect camouflage but may also be a useful nutrition for sloths who groom one another and eat the algae. Tasty or not, for strictly vegetarian sloths it could be a good addition of minerals, fat and calories.

Though Jonathan Pauli's theory is yet to be proved, it's one of the best explanations so far for this odd habit. The mysterious sloth got secured amidst algae and moths. Pure vegetarian:)

Mouldy Sloth BBCWorldwide


The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk

Photo: Cryptoses choloepi in a three-toed sloth Bradypus variegates, Carmen Ohio, http://carmenohio.deviantart.com

30.01.2014 16:15, Svetlana Shchavelina:

What a beauty... would be great to see it alive... going on a Borneo trip this year, will I have luck?

30.01.2014 15:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vladimir, I wanted to ask you, please don't mark the checkboxes "confidently/tentatively" (don't use anyway that part of the upload form), same with not identified specimens, don't confirm them as there are bugs following.
Thanks a lot for your pics, very helpful :)

30.01.2014 14:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Right, this is S. caecus indeed. Confirm.

30.01.2014 14:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

30.01.2014 13:48, Irina Nikulina:

Could be moved to confidently identified as there are only Smerinthus caecus and planus in this region (and Prymorye).

30.01.2014 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Smerinthus planus / Irina Nikulina.

30.01.2014 13:39, Irina Nikulina:

Smerinthus planus Walker, 1856

30.01.2014 13:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Deilephila askoldensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.01.2014 13:29, Irina Nikulina:

Deilephila askoldensis (Oberthür, 1879)
http://www.jpmoth.org/Sphingidae/Macroglossinae/Deilephila_askoldensis.html

30.01.2014 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I just know it as Barsine. So added the species right away. Needs to clear up: whether it's still in the Miltochrista genus or Barsine now, whilst it has Miltochrista gratiosa kurilensis Bryk, 1942 in synonyms right as at Dubatolov http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lithosiinae/Lithosiinaelist.html

30.01.2014 11:30, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, this is Miltochrista striata (Bremer & Grey, 1852). No need in adding species (many sources though do refer this to Barsine).

30.01.2014 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Barsine striata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.01.2014 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Barsine striata (Bremer et Grey, 1852) ? the only? species of the genus distributed in Far East. Had to add the species :)

30.01.2014 6:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This and #14007 are the same specimen? If so, have to be connected in one group.

30.01.2014 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.01.2014 6:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis hyperbius / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

30.01.2014 6:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Considering solely its habitus. Didn't find anything as similar whilst such are in plenty on the web. Taking into account this is a nature pic. Now have the same thing soaking.........

30.01.2014 0:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

A. hyperbius, male

30.01.2014 0:57, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Vasily, are you really capable to ID this confidently? If so, hat's off to you. :)

29.01.2014 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euclidia mi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.01.2014 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moving. Nothing more similar, eh :)

29.01.2014 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, I though I collected all them out.......... And here is this. Congratulations! Considering current climate changes, we may see the areal spread :)

29.01.2014 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notarcha basipunctalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2014 18:26, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Good evening! As far as I know, this species hasn't been spotted in Moscow region before. If so, this is the only Zygaena centaureae spot known so far in Moscow region.

29.01.2014 18:03, Lev Bely:

Vladimir, you take interesting pics. Nice photography.

29.01.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudebulea fentoni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2014 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudebulea fentoni / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2014 17:32, Irina Nikulina:

Pseudebulea fentoni ssp. ussuriensis Munroe & Mutuura, 1968
(2 pics, http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27105 were connected by the author in one group, they're clearly not the same specimen yet the species is the same)

29.01.2014 17:24, Irina Nikulina:

Pseudebulea fentoni ssp. ussuriensis Munroe & Mutuura, 1968

29.01.2014 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it's called Euclidia mi

29.01.2014 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Callistege mi It is in Far East according to Synev.

29.01.2014 15:50, Yuri Semejkin:

I noticed yesterday that chronological lapse. First there was a confirmation of the ID, then the very ID. Though that was just mere technical bug.

29.01.2014 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fedor, never seen this in our places, is it the only spot? Sorry for idle curiosity :)

29.01.2014 14:11, Irina Nikulina:

Notarcha basipunctalis. I wrote this ID for according to Synev the species belongs to the Notarcha genus http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/18826.
Foreign websites though refer the species to the Haritalodes genus (see http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Haritalodes_basipunctalis.html). Here we've got the Haritalodes genus but with only one species http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/26187. I tried to clear that out. Found some explanations in A. N. Streltsov's publication "Fauna and zoogeography of Pyraustinae (Pyraloidea: Crambidae) of the Russian Far East south" — this was in Readings in memory of A. I. Kurentsov", vol. XXIV 2013: "The Haritalodes genus, Warren, 1890, includes only one species, H. basipunctalis (Bremer, 1864). which was before referred to Notarcha Meyrick, 1884, though moths of the typical species of the genus, Zebronia cassusalis Walker, 1859, are quite different in appearance. The Haritalodes genus is set for Botys mutilinealis Guenée, 1854, which is a junior synonym of H.derogata (Fabricius, 1775) quite close to H. Basipunctalis (Dubatolov, Streltsov, 2010).
Interconnection between H. derogata and H. Basipunctalis was examined in detalis in H. Yamanaka's publication (2008) where the individuality in the H. basipunctalis (Brem.) genus was confirmed.

29.01.2014 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, please answer here: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/27101 if haven't read yet.
I've got a version, want to check it my own. Anyway, it's not a big urgent (just overemoted yesterday). Now have more important stuff to do :)
Chronology.
Yesterday: / Vladimir Bobov → Problepsis phoebearia / Irina Nikulina.
And today: / Vladimir Bobov → Ampelophaga rubiginosa / Confidently identified / Yury Semeykin.

29.01.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba gaschkewitschii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/69_Sphingidae/3020%20Marumba%20gaschkewitschii/Marumba%20gaschkewitschii.htm

29.01.2014 12:38, Irina Nikulina:

Marumba gaschkewitschii most likely

29.01.2014 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba gaschkewitschii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2014 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think the species is bingo http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/m_car.htm

29.01.2014 12:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba maackii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.01.2014 12:16, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably arumba gaschkewitschii, subspecies M. g. carstanjeni (Staudinger, 1887)

29.01.2014 11:36, Irina Nikulina:

Marumba maackii (Bremer, 1861)

29.01.2014 11:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Then it's a question to Petr. He seems to be the only one who could explain all happening and fix bugs. As I see, it's an inner site trouble, the website is already big, things changing all the time including Petr's innovations, here bugs happen.

29.01.2014 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Marumba sp. Hard to name the species...

29.01.2014 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mimas christophi / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2014 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, yes, you're right, this is the very christophi:
http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/m_chr.htm. Moving:)

29.01.2014 10:04, Vladimir Bobow: This species is identified correctly.

29.01.2014 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'll be at home around in an hour, clear that out, now hard to do.

29.01.2014 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Theretra japonica / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2014 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligula japonica / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2014 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, I personally don't care at all who is the author of the ID. Always note that de facto, don't like all this rat race. Maybe I'm just a man of a sharpened sense of justice. When such things happen( moreover regularly), I'm eager to know why.

29.01.2014 9:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Caligula japonica

29.01.2014 8:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Quite a demodocus. Also distributed in Mauritius.

29.01.2014 8:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm not good at them. To check the publication by V. V. Zolotuhin, A. V. Chuvilin "About the species of the genus Actias in Russia, Leach, 1815 (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae)".

29.01.2014 8:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily, if the trouble is in who is identifier, then I don't insist, please note the one you consider right.

29.01.2014 8:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, just I had the same yesterday (see below) and with this very author. Thus started thinking.......... So far put you as identifier, not sure about further steps... I'll try to check it personally with my specimens (not urgently). Maybe Petr will explain the situation. Or don't I get something? I always have my specimens moved right if already IDed, even uploaded last night some and everything went well.......

29.01.2014 8:17, Yuri Semejkin:

When I supposed the species, there was no any ID. What's the reason, I'm not sure, please get to know, isn't the first time.

29.01.2014 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Theretra japonica

29.01.2014 7:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily, the Far East identification guide says there are three species of this genus, of which only one is distributed in Far East, Mimas christophi Stdr , which is quite similar.

29.01.2014 7:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Laothoe amurensis / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.01.2014 7:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Theretra sp. Can't check myself right now genera and the very species in Far East. Then just grounds for pondering :)

29.01.2014 7:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Such moving recurrence rocks my mind. Was this moth IDed before Yury's comment?

29.01.2014 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Tentatively identified / Vladimir Bobow Ampelophaga rubiginosa / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2014 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Once in a blue moon I pressed that button :) Moving.

29.01.2014 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

29.01.2014 7:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyles gallii / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.01.2014 6:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is a dark variation of Mimas tiliae in Far East or am I wrong?

29.01.2014 6:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Ampelophaga rubiginosa ?

29.01.2014 6:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea yamamai / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2014 6:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea yamamai / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.01.2014 6:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Antherea yamamai

29.01.2014 6:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Antherea yamamai

29.01.2014 1:47, Vladimir Bobow: This species is identified correctly.

29.01.2014 1:27, Vladimir Bobow: This species is identified correctly.

29.01.2014 1:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's weird, I'll try to add tomorrow some of mine in such a way. And will press the button for experiment....... Why didn't get connected? Left in personal account or?

29.01.2014 0:56, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, the author pressed the button for the species was already IDed, but the pic didn't get connected. Not the first such case. So the button should be visible even if the species is not identified.
Vladimir, if the pic didn't get connected to the species, you may do that during one hour after upload in your personal account on the website or later for which you should leave a comment on the species photo page instead of confirmation :--)

29.01.2014 0:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Vladimir Bobow.

28.01.2014 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.01.2014 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.01.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Male.

28.01.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is it, male, catocala.narod.ru/las06.html. Managed to check this finally :)
Moving to confidently identified.

28.01.2014 21:14, Eddy Verfaillie:

Paracolax tristalis. *

28.01.2014 21:04, Eddy Verfaillie:

I think it is prodigellus. *

28.01.2014 20:52, Eddy Verfaillie:

Probably Eupithecia subfuscata.

28.01.2014 20:40, Eddy Verfaillie:

Scopula subpunctaria. *

28.01.2014 20:32, Eddy Verfaillie:

Phiaris umbrosana.

28.01.2014 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dendrolimus superans / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well if only one species....
Then to tentatively identified :)
Time will show.

28.01.2014 20:15, Eddy Verfaillie:

Cnephasia sp. *

28.01.2014 20:14, Irina Nikulina:

Why hurry?) Someone might confirm. Alexandr identified this species for Dina. Only one Dendrolimus species is distributed in this region though, so probability is quite high.

28.01.2014 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tentatively? Or better wait? Won't be able to check today.

28.01.2014 19:38, Irina Nikulina:

Probably Dendrolimus superans ssp. sibiricus (Tschetverikov, 1908)

28.01.2014 19:05, Eddy Verfaillie:

Idaea rufaria. *

28.01.2014 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ophthalmitis albosignaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 17:59, Irina Nikulina:

Ophthalmitis albosignaria (Bremer & Grey, 1853). http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Ennominae/Ophthalmitis_albosignaria_albosignaria.html

28.01.2014 16:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pleuroptya quadrimaculalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 16:18, Irina Nikulina:

Pleuroptya quadrimaculalis (Kollar, 1844)

28.01.2014 14:26, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitry, I got doubt after your question. Here are only two variants possible, artemis or gnoma. Artemis is more often in this region though as well as in Primorye http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=29428. What got you confused? Please specify what's the difference between them?

28.01.2014 14:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is it really artemis?

28.01.2014 13:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nacoleia maculalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 13:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, that's me wrongly with this phone internet (wouldn't wish on my enemy). Will move now :)

28.01.2014 13:37, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, didn't understand, why add? Here's already Nacoleia maculalis South, 1901) And jpmoth.org goes wrong according to Synev.

28.01.2014 13:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parapoynx vittalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 13:31, Irina Nikulina:

Parapoynx vittalis (Bremer, 1864)

28.01.2014 13:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems should add the species. Can't get which one though. And nearly no internet connection tomorrow....

28.01.2014 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pyralidae

28.01.2014 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The US... Could be tentatively moved to Pyralidae looking at how it posed the antennae.

28.01.2014 13:16, Irina Nikulina:

Nacoleia maculalis South, 1901 (many Asian websites including jpmoth.org name it Nacoleia sibirialis (Milliere, 1879) though: http://www.jpmoth.org/Crambidae/Pyraustinae/Nacoleia_sibirialis.html )

28.01.2014 13:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, remove the button. Or make it invisible if the species is not IDed yet to see the button after the ID is made and the species is moved. Sure, if that's possible.....

28.01.2014 13:00, Lev Bely:

Barsine sp.?

28.01.2014 13:00, Lev Bely:

Barsine sp.?

28.01.2014 12:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Vladimir Bobow Problepsis phoebearia / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Talanga quadrimaculalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 12:41, Irina Nikulina:

Problepsis phoebearia Erschov, 1870

28.01.2014 12:36, Irina Nikulina:

Talanga quadrimaculalis (Bremer & Grey, 1853)

28.01.2014 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Actias artemis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligula boisduvalii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.01.2014 12:01, Irina Nikulina:

Caligula boisduvalii, fallax ssp. in Russian Far East, Jordan, 1911

28.01.2014 11:29, Irina Nikulina:

Actias artemis Bremer, 1861.

28.01.2014 8:54, Vladimir Bobow: This species is identified correctly.

27.01.2014 22:18, Peter Khramov:

Why it's still there, the author noted that during upload, so the author is identifier whilst Alexandr did confirm.

27.01.2014 22:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Alex Dumchus Roger Dolorosa.

27.01.2014 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok, won't prompt anymore. About to add some more now :)

27.01.2014 22:09, Peter Khramov:

I constantly monitor not-illustrated species, so illustrations will be ultimately added even somewhat later. The only trouble thing is when a species was illustrated already with poor or smaller pics, I may miss such. Not this case though.

27.01.2014 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Today I added two endemic species from Borneo gladly. The admin got lost somewhere :)

27.01.2014 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

If there are anything to do, why not illustrate :)

27.01.2014 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time to illustrate the species.

27.01.2014 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time to illustrate the species.

27.01.2014 20:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time to illustrate the species.

27.01.2014 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Everyone has, even human :)

26.01.2014 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Nymphalis xanthomelas / Vitaly Gumenuk Nymphalis vaualbum / Sergei Kotov.

26.01.2014 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergey, please no exclamation marks :) No need in those indeed.

26.01.2014 21:03, Sergei Kotov:

This pic should be deleted as it's a double of this one: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/7895

26.01.2014 20:59, Sergei Kotov:

Wrong ID. This is not N. xanthomelas!
This is Nymphalis vaualbum.

26.01.2014 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who is identifier then? There was no this addition in the subtitle with three ??? signs yesterday. Did Alexandr.

26.01.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium agamemnon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

26.01.2014 20:07, Alex Dumchus:

By the way, it's rather P.erithonioides or twin of P.demodocus is distributed on Mauritius.

26.01.2014 19:55, Alex Dumchus:

Agamemnon definitely, I collected same in Thailand with my own hands...

26.01.2014 18:45, Shamil Murtazin:

Has Arctia caja this as well?... Arctiidae too :)

26.01.2014 17:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea sylvester / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

26.01.2014 17:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea sylvester / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

26.01.2014 17:13, Igor Ivannikov: This species is identified correctly.

26.01.2014 17:12, Igor Ivannikov: This species is identified correctly.

26.01.2014 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta rumicis / Nikolai Vladimirov Subacronicta megacephala / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.01.2014 15:30, Sergei Kotov:

Subacronicta megacephala.

26.01.2014 15:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, please specify which ID you confirmed as there were three species mentioned.

26.01.2014 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Nyctobrya muralis / Zoran Bozovic Moma alpium / Eddy Verfaillie.

26.01.2014 14:49, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.01.2014 14:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus chrysippus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.01.2014 14:39, Sergei Kotov:

Somehow lost in not identified. Some bug. To fix up.

26.01.2014 14:38, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.01.2014 12:44, Peter Khramov:

Igor, please upload pics with individual specimens in them, males and females separately.

26.01.2014 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Will sort it out...

25.01.2014 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How come could it be added as Euploea only? Weird......
Some bug?

25.01.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euploea / Tentatively identified / Igor Ivannikov Not identified.

25.01.2014 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Euploea means genus only. Moved back to not identified.

25.01.2014 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euploea / Tentatively identified / Igor Ivannikov Not identified.

25.01.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Igor Ivannikov Danaus chrysippus / .

25.01.2014 19:09, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Moma alpium. *

25.01.2014 19:04, Eddy Verfaillie:

I think this is "berbera".

25.01.2014 18:39, Eddy Verfaillie:

I have to correct it: Subacronicta megacephala.

25.01.2014 18:34, Eddy Verfaillie:

I also think this is Acronicta megacephala.

25.01.2014 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

25.01.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia hypsea / Confidently identified / Roger Dolorosa.

25.01.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia hypsea / Confidently identified / Roger Dolorosa.

25.01.2014 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 17:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I simply seem to be a deep patriot :)

25.01.2014 16:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) Vasily, the species is named right here on lepidoptera.pro, Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata. Let's not blame faunaeur.org as that's a very good source, they just know poor our literature so no full info on our countries. :)

25.01.2014 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias lyncida / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 14:54, Roger Dolorosa:

thanks *

25.01.2014 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parthenos sylvia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please don't rely on this fauna website even it's europea :) Too many questions to it every turn...... Quite doubtful source...........

25.01.2014 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 13:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The white band is somewhat narrow... Wait a bit, doubtful.

25.01.2014 13:55, Roger Dolorosa:

thanks *

25.01.2014 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved back to not identified. Got serious doubts about myself........

25.01.2014 13:54, Roger Dolorosa:

many thanks

25.01.2014 13:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Graphium sarpedon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

25.01.2014 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.01.2014 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

25.01.2014 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Appias lyncida / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 13:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium sarpedon / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 13:43, Roger Dolorosa: This species is identified correctly.

25.01.2014 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus chrysippus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Male & female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.01.2014 11:31, Roger Dolorosa:

Hypolimnas bolina *

25.01.2014 0:51, Peter Khramov:

Eh?

25.01.2014 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Anyone comment please?

24.01.2014 19:44, Eddy Verfaillie:

Ochyria isn't recognised any more on the Fauna Europaea. The only accepted name is Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata for the species below.

24.01.2014 15:30, Eddy Verfaillie:

I think this is complana. *

24.01.2014 3:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander indicating incorrect determination on the page a particular photo, then much easier to correct the error. :)

24.01.2014 3:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Synaphe punctalis / Zoran Bozovic Donacaula forficella / Aleksandr Andrianov.

24.01.2014 2:53, Roger Dolorosa:

Cethosia hypsea *

24.01.2014 2:51, Roger Dolorosa:

Cethosia hypsea *

24.01.2014 1:13, Aleksandr Andrianov:

It turns out, yes.

24.01.2014 1:10, Peter Khramov:

Basil, try to do in the near future. Right now, only the interface to formalize signs drained slightly.

24.01.2014 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Ie Incorrect definition?

24.01.2014 0:34, Aleksandr Andrianov:

family Pyralidae → subfamily Pyralinae → tribe Pyralini → genus Synaphe → view Synaphe punctalis depicted female Donacaula forficella

23.01.2014 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved this so far (tentatively identified). Kind of hard are they all. The only image on the web (save this one) is http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=257435

23.01.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argema mittrei / Vitaly Gumenuk Argema mimosae / Andrey Polstyanoy.

23.01.2014 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argema mittrei / Vitaly Gumenuk Argema mimosae / Andrey Polstyanoy.

23.01.2014 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argema mittrei / Vitaly Gumenuk Argema mimosae / Andrey Polstyanoy.

23.01.2014 15:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argema mittrei / Vitaly Gumenuk Argema mimosae / Andrey Polstyanoy.

23.01.2014 15:04, Andrey Polstyanoy:

This is Argema mimosae

23.01.2014 15:03, Andrey Polstyanoy:

This is actually Argema mimosae, not mittrei.

23.01.2014 15:03, Andrey Polstyanoy:

This is actually Argema mimosae, not mittrei.

23.01.2014 15:03, Andrey Polstyanoy:

This is actually Argema mimosae, not mittrei.

23.01.2014 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

up

23.01.2014 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Some weird bug: after having moved back from confidently identified to tentatively identified the moth lost in the section of comments to the photo. Thus upped not to have it lost.

23.01.2014 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

173х133 enlarged. Is it possible anyway to ID with a pic such size?

23.01.2014 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vitessa sp. Pyralidae. I seemed to have identfied one today, but this is kind of hard. Anyone knows it, maybe?

23.01.2014 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyssa zampa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.01.2014 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vitessa teleroma / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.01.2014 23:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Severe stare )

22.01.2014 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ideopsis vulgaris / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.01.2014 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well let it be this then :)

22.01.2014 20:18, Alex Dumchus:

This is Vulgaris, I.similis has no such clear "tooth" on forewing underside, also the latter is a bit brighter.

22.01.2014 20:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Belousov Alexander Apopestes phantasma / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.01.2014 19:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tentatively identified? Or will wait a little bit?

22.01.2014 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Graphium sarpedon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

22.01.2014 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pachliopta aristolochiae / Imago / Ianthe Marie Benliro Papilio memnon / Female / Alex Dumchus.

22.01.2014 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right indeed :)

22.01.2014 17:52, Alex Dumchus:

Looks quite similar to I.vulgaris

22.01.2014 17:51, Alex Dumchus:

What the heck? This is P.memnon (or previously P.Lowi) female.

22.01.2014 17:49, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium sarpedon

22.01.2014 16:14, Alexander Belousov: This species is identified correctly.

22.01.2014 16:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Belousov Alexander Apopestes phantasma / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.01.2014 15:57, Alexander Belousov:

I try to shoot specimens in black and white backgrounds, include ruler not always. I've got as well these in the white background with no ruler.

22.01.2014 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Abraxas grossulariata / Maxim Schwarz Abraxas sylvata / Sergei Kotov.

22.01.2014 15:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, you're totally right!

22.01.2014 15:37, Sergei Kotov:

Is it really A. grossulariata? As I see, looks more of Abraxas sylvata.

22.01.2014 15:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeah, again. :(

22.01.2014 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time to separate them in some special section in the Gallery :)
Not to add the not identified section.

22.01.2014 14:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, was that you again, anonymous?

22.01.2014 14:55, :

That looks ideal, the ruler doesn't impede anything, good quality, one con is that two sides of the moth are featured, Petr will notice that especially. :).
This species is illustrated with only these photos anywhere on the web, nothing to substitute with. I think such ruler as here makes photo more informative. Yet some authors might use wooden and plastic rulers, in an inaccurate manner or simply out of focus. Depends on situation, not in every shot. Photos as well happen to be quite poor which are blamed way more than a scarcely distinct ruler in ideal pic, that may be evenly bad or some art solution :)

22.01.2014 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia hedonia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.01.2014 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Graphium sp. Can't say further.

22.01.2014 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The date isn't noticed which is bad. Suppose it's the same butterfly http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26975 Or shot at the same time :)

22.01.2014 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.01.2014 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Potanthus omaha / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.01.2014 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio demoleus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.01.2014 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Surely it's a twin Papilio demoleus. Now moving.

22.01.2014 14:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Is it Papilio demodocus? Is it distributed in the Philippines? Or am I wrong about the species and this is something similar? Wouldn't risk so far to move it with such a location.

22.01.2014 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The ruler are to be blamed :) Should be solved decisively if to include it or not. Congratulations with the first photo of the species!

22.01.2014 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Imago / Belousov Alexander Apopestes phantasma / Male / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.01.2014 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

22.01.2014 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Belousov Alexander Apopestes phantasma / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.01.2014 12:12, Roger Dolorosa:

Junonia iphita *

22.01.2014 3:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

22.01.2014 3:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

22.01.2014 2:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Charaxes basquini / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.01.2014 2:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Charaxes basquini / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.01.2014 2:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius melpomene / Tentatively identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

22.01.2014 2:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

If this is Heliconius melpomene, then subspecies rosina Boisduval, 1870. Yet there's another one of the same appearance in Costa Rica, Heliconius erato petiverana Doubleday, 1847

22.01.2014 2:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just moved this out of the admin panel. Guys, let's not note genus on upload if you don't know species. In such cases upload just as it is, with no names.

22.01.2014 2:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Junonia atlites / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.01.2014 2:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To melpomene tentatively identified, right?

22.01.2014 2:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right, didn't read till the end. This one is in synonyms there :)

22.01.2014 1:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, this is species.

22.01.2014 1:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subspecies needed to be cleared as well. Alexandr please take it on.

22.01.2014 1:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Heliconius cydno Heliconius pachinus.

22.01.2014 1:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius cydno / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

22.01.2014 1:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subspecies may be added by the author him/herself in the personal account.

22.01.2014 1:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius cydno / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

22.01.2014 1:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cymothoe consanguis / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

22.01.2014 1:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cymothoe consanguis / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

22.01.2014 1:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexandr, why don't you identify yourself? You already put this species here.

22.01.2014 1:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius burneyi / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

22.01.2014 1:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, thanks for the confirmation, these two pics are linked :)

22.01.2014 1:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aporia potanini / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.01.2014 1:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aporia potanini / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.01.2014 1:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can I have my two cents? We are not arguing about how, as a basis we took for Russia directory Sineva, Europe www.faunaeur.org, now rush? quietly we arrange photos by genera and species :) It makes no sense to change a particular case, but it will have to do it consistently and tear each other plumes as well.kordinalno system will change Peter bind to another site, and change the system. so that was not nervous, working :)

22.01.2014 1:12, Roger Dolorosa:

thanks a lot *

22.01.2014 1:11, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Heliconius melpomene amaryllis ?

22.01.2014 1:10, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Heliconius cydno f3 х Heliconius melpomene f1

22.01.2014 1:07, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Heliconius cydno f1 х Heliconius melpomene f1

22.01.2014 1:04, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Aporia potanini

http://www.ebay.com/itm/5-unmounted-butterfly-Pieridae-Aporia-potanini-A1-A1-/281169528978?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4177028892

22.01.2014 1:02, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Aporia potanini

22.01.2014 0:57, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Heliconius cydno pachinus Salvin 1871
=Heliconius pachinus

22.01.2014 0:55, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Heliconius cydno galanthus H. Bates, 1864

22.01.2014 0:54, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Cymothoe consanguis

22.01.2014 0:52, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Cymothoe consanguis

22.01.2014 0:50, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Heliconius burneyi

21.01.2014 23:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here's a pretty reputable source: http://www.nhc.ed.ac.uk/index.php?page=25.26.36
Here, too, you can find both Satyridae: http://www.insecta-web.org/MWM/htmls/sammlung.html Witte Museum is also very influential organization. You can even search and find. Tired.

21.01.2014 22:30, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I removed.

21.01.2014 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, here it is necessary to come konsennsusu somehow. Let us look for ... and now let in satyrinae pray thee. They have long been the way of football here and there :)

21.01.2014 22:22, Peter Khramov:

Vasily that in kindergarten?) There are also many ssylochek https://www.google.ru/search?client=opera&q=Satyridae&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest#channel=suggest&newwindow=1&q=Satyrinae but this proves nothing: -)) a reference other need, yeah.

21.01.2014 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And this I mean that they are no longer Satyri N ae, and Satyri D ae, but ......
And there's a lot ssylochek: https://www.google.ru/search?client=opera&q=Satyridae&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest

21.01.2014 22:00, Peter Khramov:

And then one against said? Basil, you can credit, a reference where it is "now" are not relevant?

21.01.2014 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ypthima sp. Should check the Philippines.

21.01.2014 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Erionota torus ?

21.01.2014 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The men, and in fact exactly Satyridae Boisduval, 1833 to the Nymphalidae no longer apply :) Igor Stas right. It is necessary to alter the classification. A few years ago, your humble servant, even subject to Molbiole them did and still no title against said nothing: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=364536 post title there is not edited once.But the second is now popralyu: Leda is not there as it turned out later, and I forgot :)

21.01.2014 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

21.01.2014 18:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia oenone no variants

21.01.2014 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here at all seven (Antarctica can be excluded: insects are not compatible with it in general): http://big-archive.ru/geography/basis_of_common_geography/79.php the remaining six on the website. Let's leave it at that. Why split hairs and invent some kind of gag? There are many other, more relevant to current affairs :)

21.01.2014 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why single out the African island of Madagascar in a separate zoogeographic region. Yes, it was full of endemic species, and he goeth Afrotropical region, however. Where did come from the Ethiopian region in the whole of Africa? Smarter contrary to simplify, not complicate unnecessarily The English for status. in 1992. A total of 5 regions, and not 6 like on this website.That image (though it is a photo, not scans, the scanner is not working). It is quite adequate separation in my mind:
Palaearctic region

Afrotropical region (which actually includes the island of Madagascar).

Indo-Australian region

Nearctic region

And Neotropical region

And I repeat: do not islands that make up some of the continent to allocate in separate areas (eg Madagascar): http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Мадагаскар_(остров)

21.01.2014 16:10, Peter Khramov:

The question arose. And if we have adequate separation of the region is on the site or you may want to update it until naformalizovali wasted on outdated scheme. So now we have a choice from a list:
Palaearctic, Nearctic, Neotropical, Ethiopian, Indo-Malayan, Australian region.Perhaps, somewhere something should be divided, or vice versa, or even do it differently. For example, highlight Madagascar. Write who believes.Again, the point is that the form will bear Kaji area where he lives, this info can be convenient to look at the description page of the form, as well as selected species on this basis in the catalog (partially working now).

21.01.2014 10:35, Shamil Murtazin:

More I offer the opportunity to make a direct link to the image file. Now the script does not allow do it (although the link still be caught).
Pros: possible expansion of the audience at the expense of "advertising" in the caption to the picture.Cons: the probability of load on the server when placing images on vysokoposeschaemom resource until "habraeffektov."

21.01.2014 2:29, Roger Dolorosa:

thanks a lot for confirming my identification; greatly appreciate *

21.01.2014 2:26, Roger Dolorosa:

Thank you! *

21.01.2014 2:23, Roger Dolorosa:

Thanks for all your very fast help in identifying the species. *

20.01.2014 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you please do me the opportunity of my amendment lux. In terms of replacement and transfer photos. There is a great desire to do it yourself: something to re-shoot again and assigning a new image to replace the old names, but something probably remove altogether (some photos cut eye). You know me, I tell the matter.Just I do not want you to strain about each butterfly requiring these operations. Simply I can not do it myself. Online high umenja :)

20.01.2014 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov Junonia oenone / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.01.2014 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Igor Ivannikov.

20.01.2014 19:32, Stan Korb:

But to no avail. They separate the family that has been repeatedly shown not only domestic and scientists. Zapihivanie them to the rank of subfamily Nymphalidae - it is simply a return to Kirby staruschey classification in 1871.

20.01.2014 19:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ideopsis vulgaris / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.01.2014 19:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

20.01.2014 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cethosia luzonica / Roger Dolorosa Cethosia hypsea / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.01.2014 19:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cethosia luzonica Cethosia hypsea.

20.01.2014 19:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Roger Dolorosa Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.01.2014 18:45, Zhanna Saripova: This species is identified correctly.

20.01.2014 18:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ideopsis vulgaris

20.01.2014 18:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male

20.01.2014 18:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cethosia hypsea palawana Fruhstorfer, 1900

20.01.2014 18:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cethosia hypsea palawana Fruhstorfer, 1900

20.01.2014 18:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erites argentina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.01.2014 18:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Erites argentina

20.01.2014 16:48, Alex Dumchus:

Andrey, I met such names only once on some trade website, I mean gahua and phadena, and gahua/phadena for blue-brown variation. This is wrong. I've got 6 differently coloured cisseis, some of which are mixed, gahua or phanodemus. Here's some info from other sources:

Morpho cisseis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1860 TL: Brazil (Am)

Morpho cisseis cisseis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1860 TL: Brazil (Am) M T

Morpho cisseis gahua Blandin, 1988 TL: Peru M T

Morpho cisseis phanodemus Hewitson, 1869 TL: Ecuador M T

20.01.2014 15:00, Lev Bely:



The Saint-Petersburg Ecology and Biology Centre “Krestovsky Island” bestows Alexey Kupriyanov Entomology Club that offers entomology classes for juniors and seniors. Alexey Kupriyanov graduated from the Saint Petersburg State University, the Biology Department (1992), he's a candidate in biological sciences. He continued his work in the alma mater as a teacher in the Zoology Department, authored a number of publications on the Incurvariidae taxonomy, different groups of insects of Northwest Russia and the history of botany and zoology in the 18 and 19 centuries.



The club classes include the course on general biology and basic zoology, entomology practicum (taught by Oleg Valersky, Ilya Udalov and Vasily Zlatogursky), observation of the insects and other arthropods of the club insectarium, excursions through Leningrad region to the Voronya (Crow) mountain (Dudergof), Old Peterhof, the Lava River canyon, field practicum in the vicinity of Jaschera village, summer expeditions to the Sebezh National Park in the south of Pskov region.
The course is divided to two years, study and research, the second year students learn how to make a collection, work with scientific literature, study a chosen group of insects. Wednesdays are given to the lectures on general biology, at Fridays they have practice on the insect biodiversity, anatomy and morphology as well as those of other arthropods.
Alexey Kupriyanov Entomology Club is open September—May, classes taught in the Saint-Petersburg Ecology and Biology Centre “Krestovsky Island”, room 12, basement of the main building, 19 Krestovsky avenue, Saint Petersburg, Russia. To enrol please visit the club or e-mail Alexey Kupriyanov tinea@narod.ru.
The entomology club website http://tinea.narod.ru features the course schedule, personalities of the club, useful info of expeditions and excursions, photoalbum, links to the interesting Russian and foreign biology sites, works of the club graduates, the “Help” section for volunteers and all people willing to contribute. The club has also the Vkontakte social page http://vk.com/club4475984 and the livejournal community http://entomolog-spb.livejournal.com. The club page on the Saint-Petersburg Ecology and Biology Centre “Krestovsky Island” website: http://eco-bio.spb.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64&Itemid=12.
Alexey Kupriyanov Entomology Club, http://tinea.narod.ru
Saint-Petersburg Ecology and Biology Centre “Krestovsky Island”, http://eco-bio.spb.ru
Photo: Lev Bely, Moscow International Insect Fair 2013

20.01.2014 14:12, Svetlana Shchavelina:

# 26946: Trogonoptera trojana - see "More pictures from the same individual." Somewhere the author put down extra tick or bug?

20.01.2014 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter then linked photos in the "Photo of the same individual" 5 different species: 26956, 26864, 26946, 26867, 26871.

20.01.2014 13:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima horsfieldii / Confidently identified / Roger Dolorosa.

20.01.2014 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

20.01.2014 11:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia iphita / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.01.2014 8:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

20.01.2014 8:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia iphita

20.01.2014 4:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, some addition also. Here is completely another specimen http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26762, of better quality than this one http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2952 which I think should be deleted. I'd like to correct my mistakes. Pity have no authority to delete or change.

20.01.2014 4:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then move that back... Two opinions alike :)

20.01.2014 2:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2012-05-00 00:00:00.

20.01.2014 2:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Samia insularis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

20.01.2014 2:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, those are synonyms, please correspond your IDs with species names here. :)

20.01.2014 2:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nudaurelia petiveri / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

20.01.2014 2:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypocrita confluens / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.01.2014 1:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania palmyra / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

20.01.2014 1:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dysphania palmyra.

20.01.2014 0:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Andrey Polstyanoy.

20.01.2014 0:29, Roger Dolorosa:

Thank you, greatly appreciate it!

20.01.2014 0:27, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Just typoed ))

20.01.2014 0:26, Roger Dolorosa:

Thank you all guys for identifying and or confirming the identification of all the species I recently posted. This helps a lot to a hobbyist like me. *

20.01.2014 0:25, Andrey Polstyanoy:

As I see, this specimen looks more nominative. Those autolycus I saw had the blue area in its hind wings ended kinda rounded not jagged.

20.01.2014 0:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

How come it's called Morpho cesseis? Nothing alike anywhere. :) Morpho cisseis

20.01.2014 0:19, Andrey Polstyanoy:

The blue variation of this ssp is called Morpho cesseis gahua f. gahua whilst blue-brown is called f. phadena.

20.01.2014 0:15, Andrey Polstyanoy: This species is identified correctly.

20.01.2014 0:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Supposed Appias drusilla, better to wait for the underside though.

20.01.2014 0:05, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Hypocrita plagifera

20.01.2014 0:04, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Dysphania palmyra

20.01.2014 0:04, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Dysphania palmyra

20.01.2014 0:02, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Nudaurelia dione

20.01.2014 0:00, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Samia insularis

19.01.2014 23:57, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Appias sp ?

19.01.2014 23:56, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Looks like Heliconius cydno f3 х Heliconius melpomene f3

19.01.2014 23:54, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Looks like Heliconius cydno f2 х Heliconius melpomene f1

19.01.2014 23:53, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Looks like Heliconius cydno f2 х Heliconius melpomene

19.01.2014 23:50, Andrey Polstyanoy:

Heliconius cydno f3 х Heliconius melpomene f2

19.01.2014 23:48, Andrey Polstyanoy: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2014 23:33, Peter Khramov:

The moderator interface are done so the new phase is getting started, formalization of the species features. Now only me and Sergey Kotov are authorized to formalize those, later other moderators will get involved. As any new thing, this may have some more bugs so if any of you notice something inappropriate, please don't pass by silently, comment species pages where formalization is buggy or right here, this post.
P. S. Formalization of the species features means that plain text info kind of "flight period is April—May" gets databased and formalized like "April, May" after which you may select catalogued species by its flight periods, and those data are shown in the grid above on the species description page, not only in the section "Full info".

19.01.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well I'm trying, maybe not in a common way though...
Just today uploaded two wingspread lycaons despite it already has such pics. This species varies a lot (multiplied here recently with lots of variations, especially females to collect). Wanna put them all here :)

19.01.2014 21:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, I save your time, the new pic is not better way much, so you'd better put here pics of those species yet not illustrated with wingspread photos than reupload those already have such. As for Zeuzera pyrina, that went even worse, overlighted. Vasily, create new :) don't repeat yourself ;)

19.01.2014 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, I seem to have just only one specimen of this species, no choice, I wanted to try more pics with this one. Anyway, you are to decide which one is better :)

19.01.2014 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, if not a secret, please why reupload photos of not perfect quality? Sure pic may be enlarged, but what's the sense if it's a so-so image than instead upload images for the species yet not illustrated?

19.01.2014 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's odd, I first had the same bug with that sylvia from the Philippines, then this one. Can't get.

19.01.2014 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Doesn't :)

19.01.2014 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something wrong happens, already changed it twice: some weird bug.

19.01.2014 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Ilia Ustiantcev.

19.01.2014 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Ilia Ustiantcev.

19.01.2014 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To delete. Uploaded fresh images of this female.

19.01.2014 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Ilia Ustiantcev.

19.01.2014 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Ilia Ustiantcev.

19.01.2014 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Ilia Ustiantcev.

19.01.2014 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Ilia Ustiantcev.

19.01.2014 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

19.01.2014 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

19.01.2014 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is to be deleted too due to the new uploads of pics of this specimen.

19.01.2014 15:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To delete. New photos of this specimen uploaded.

19.01.2014 15:45, Peter Khramov:

Roger, is this the same specimen as here http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/26871 ?

19.01.2014 15:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Female.

19.01.2014 15:42, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bhutanitis mansfieldi / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

19.01.2014 15:41, Alex Dumchus:

Then delete #26892

19.01.2014 15:22, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, ah-ah-ah! .. That is why the smiley face was :)

19.01.2014 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cupha arias / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.01.2014 15:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2014 15:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2014 15:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

19.01.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea stolli / Tentatively identified / Roger Dolorosa Idea leuconoe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.01.2014 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idea stolli / Roger Dolorosa Idea leuconoe / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.01.2014 15:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is some Danaus

19.01.2014 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

19.01.2014 15:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cupha arias cacina

19.01.2014 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Basil Sergienko.

19.01.2014 15:15, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you, Alexander!

19.01.2014 15:15, Shamil Murtazin:

I try to invite the author ...

19.01.2014 15:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Idea leuconoe princesa

19.01.2014 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Troides magellanus / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

19.01.2014 15:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Idea leuconoe princesa

19.01.2014 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well many thanks: I'm nearly nothing in them and still have plenty of not identified noctuids...

19.01.2014 15:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2014 15:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Female

19.01.2014 15:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2014 14:54, Alex Dumchus:

from #26899 to #26913 are Heliconius hybrids

19.01.2014 14:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

T. magellanus magellanus male

19.01.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's me again, under the brand name was anonymous :)

19.01.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Apamea monoglypha / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

19.01.2014 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia thalassina / Vasiliy Feoktistov Apamea monoglypha / Basil Sergienko.

19.01.2014 14:46, :

Shamil, probably yes. :) I agree that? To Anaplectoides prasina.

19.01.2014 14:12, Shamil Murtazin:

No assumptions, right?

19.01.2014 14:02, Shamil Murtazin:

There is a great desire otfotografirovat butterflies eggs with high magnification.
They have a very varied and interesting form and texture.
The equipment is available.
If you pass with eggs in the South Urals - welcome to the photo shoot.
At most it was impossible to detect until the clutch or with a clutch catch the female.

19.01.2014 13:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I propose to make two resizing in any case, one "small", for example 500 on the long side and the "big", 1024 or so on the long side. Small on the preview, and clicking on the big "horse-size".
Basil, here and so a gallery of photos. It seems that Peter already had long been foreseen: the size of the disk, and computational abilities.All proposals try to give to facilitate the process. That is to say, the concept of a single click or a single tap.

19.01.2014 13:38, Alex Dumchus:

T.helena or T.criton male, or their hybrids (there are such)

19.01.2014 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parthenos sylvia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.01.2014 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A space on a server is enough, "Parties" foty? There is a possibility? If so then do it, of course: much easier to be.

19.01.2014 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To delete: uploaded a better photo of this specimen.

19.01.2014 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can't get it, I already moved this to the species and still it's in not identified?

19.01.2014 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Troides sp. Can't say more with such an angle.

19.01.2014 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parthenos sylvia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.01.2014 2:26, Peter Khramov:

Seems everything's marked properly. What's the trouble?

19.01.2014 2:13, Peter Khramov:

They're definitely not needless. So far mark such things "hybrids" on upload, later I will easily select all of them to make some separate selection.

19.01.2014 1:20, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, there will always be people who are unable or too lazy. The proposal, in general, correct, or do so at all on the site Fota goods, not just another site appeared.

19.01.2014 0:36, Peter Khramov:

Further optimized the main page of the catalog, now, if not to impose the additional parameters, it flies just 1-2 seconds. And most importantly, too poduskoril also much nicer it is now open.

19.01.2014 0:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And to reduce your picture unless it is impossible in any way? From 800x600 and below normal already goes :)

18.01.2014 23:58, Shamil Murtazin:

I do not open a new topic, for the same offer.
Maybe it makes sense to modify the "picture from another site"
To be "kosher": the picture is always displayed, for example in the amount of 400h300 pixels, and the click increases or shifts to the picture itself ...
Otherwise, after the insertion of links you can get a huge picture in the post. Do not gud.

18.01.2014 23:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then now you should note that in your personal account. Should be like this (screenshot).

18.01.2014 23:52, Peter Khramov:

In the last few days the "Taxonomy" section has been updated with a better interface, new data in the daughter taxa level (family, subfamily and so on), also the "Catalogue" section now works faster and a way more proper as to the species selection, the "Community" section was divided to subsections and got more handy to use with a new option to comment superspecies taxa further to the previous commenting of species, photos and posts. Besides, you may insert a HTML-text in your comments using subtitles, bold and italic fonts as well as insert images placed on other websites.

18.01.2014 23:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Here are 3 photos butterfly. Himself guess it Anaplectoides prasina. Sukhumi, September.
I give the links, pictures and big screen is not intermeddle:
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6709/123435528.2e/0_dad90_44968d6a_XL.jpg
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/9765/123435528.2e/0_dad98_61e4b966_-1-XL.jpg
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/9808/123435528.2e/0_dad9a_149cadf0_-1-XL.jpg

18.01.2014 23:49, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, on the tracks.
This female accidentally fell into the jar. Gusyanka, reached a cocoon and butterfly - no. Yes, and what to feed it then :)

18.01.2014 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Forgot to add, as a background I use common Whatman paper. Not printer paper which is too blueish, just Whatman. I think this matters.

18.01.2014 23:25, Igor Sakhno:

I noted that on the very upload (there's also such feature)

18.01.2014 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You should note that here (see screenshot attached). I first tried this on one of mine, than move that back as it had been before. That's easy.

18.01.2014 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Should be separate section here for such handmade things. Would be interesting?

18.01.2014 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, I've got luminescent lamp in my kitchen, above the table, which has 2 20WT tubes. Also it evidently has electronic choke to minimize flicker as it has a higher rate than a usual choke. As fro the postwork, it's Photoshop CS5,5 (64 bit) and ACDSee Pro 6 (64 bit): Win7 64-bit. Oldest camera, Olympus C480 Zoom (4Mpx in macro regime). Pure shamanism, have no better equipment yet though :)

18.01.2014 22:32, Peter Khramov:

Well see gradually not only Vasily will upgrade his skill...

18.01.2014 22:17, Alex Dumchus:

Petr. This one is mule or "horse-like", in other words hybrid. If it's needless here, please delete, otherwise I could upload few more hybrids not yet systematized by Linneus though. Nice devils.

18.01.2014 21:55, Alex Dumchus:

No, I won't overpraise. What do you use to remove shadows, photoshop or shoot in daylight?

18.01.2014 21:53, Igor Sakhno:

I seem to have done that already. Maybe didn't work somewhere?

18.01.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cabera pusaria.

18.01.2014 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

18.01.2014 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cabera pusaria / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

18.01.2014 20:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, you do overpraise me :) I'm just learning to photoshop. Some good man I appreciate much advised me this lately.

18.01.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cabera pusaria / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

18.01.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cabera pusaria / Confidently identified / Alexander Boldyrev.

18.01.2014 19:44, Alex Dumchus:

Why couldn't take pic with white background? And the very photo is not good quality. Whilst Vasily's recent pics are really great! Updating previous loads. I too should take some time one day and reshoot all my morphos and papilios.

18.01.2014 18:50, Peter Khramov:

Ssp and variation name may be noted on upload. Just not in the field "Species name" but "Taxonomy specification".

18.01.2014 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one should have been plainly signed as Morpho didius without any m. (means menelaus), correcting already second morpho today :(

18.01.2014 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Meant both photos featured the same specimen.

18.01.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.01.2014 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.01.2014 15:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Igor, please mark all these pics with "supermacro" in your personal account. Would be better.

18.01.2014 15:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I already sorted that out and moved where it belonged.
Igor, please don't notice ssp on upload, better to add it later in your personal account.

18.01.2014 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Igor, you got wrong in the species name.

18.01.2014 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Morpho cisseis.

18.01.2014 15:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Igor Ivannikov.

18.01.2014 15:07, Igor Ivannikov: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2014 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

4 most evident species on the website:
Autographa gamma
Autographa jota
Polygonia c-album
Nymphalis vaualbum
They even have Latin names concurrent with the letters.

17.01.2014 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I Tried: ok now.

17.01.2014 17:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now everything is normal. Thank you!

17.01.2014 17:16, Peter Khramov:

Basil fixed, you can use it.

17.01.2014 17:04, Peter Khramov:

Some types of sorts in the catalog issuance could slow down, and the "Sort by" to display an incorrect value. Now it's fixed.
In addition, they decided an issue where on the page description of the species section might appear inappropriate photos pop labels (names of other species or in general "view is not defined").

17.01.2014 16:47, Peter Khramov:

Reserves removed. Could appear on the page refresh in the browser immediately after boot. Suitable section there - "Talk site."

16.01.2014 21:06, Andrey Ponomarev:

Yep, :-))

16.01.2014 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2012-09-16 21:38:00.

16.01.2014 11:11, Anna Gerasimova:

Cool))) though no butterflies seen at all.

16.01.2014 10:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Spotted a post of the letters on lepidoptera wings. Somebody took pains and collected the whole alphabet :)

Would be great to know also the species...

16.01.2014 5:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only now does not work, this sort reason: resets to "name (including race)." Or tuplyu I something? Now he is gone for a day, and tomorrow pokumekat necessary.

16.01.2014 3:43, Yuri Semejkin:

...trouble with uploading pictures — not anymore

16.01.2014 3:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, I added data which somehow doubled
http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/23117

16.01.2014 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Basil, just go to the catalog and choose to sort by last update.

15.01.2014 20:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, sites of red books and electronic versions from different sources ...
Interested in more adequate and the inclusion of species in the book. Most often it is just a very bright, beautiful butterflies. As swallowtail or birch moth in Bashkortostan.

15.01.2014 20:05, Shamil Murtazin:

He likes macro as well =)

15.01.2014 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes 3 hung today: and there, and here :) any way and anywhere they can not find.

15.01.2014 19:24, Peter Khramov:

Shamil and what is meant by electronic? Sites Red Books?
Dim, yes, he will cast the Old too.

15.01.2014 19:13, Peter Khramov:

Strangely these anonymously. Rubbish catch can not ...
P about the uncertain species - unique should be hanged . Molbiol - is good, but it is not 100% RF entomology. And besides, we are now intensifying of foreign version. So that. Hang!

15.01.2014 19:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil immediately question. You put undetermined butterflies and you think that they are able to determine if mobiole undecided? They will be here to hang uncertain. My personal opinion, do not hang mooderatoram indeterminate species. :) nothing personal :)

15.01.2014 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is when the message is sent immediately, but after a time I kicked a gun. The message is gone, but anonymous :)

15.01.2014 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is who we have anonymous? Or a glitch? :)

15.01.2014 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, best defined by the tracks :)
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Fotouebersicht_Lymantriinae_Orgyiini_W_2
and see what can be in the southern Urals of blue.

15.01.2014 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.01.2014 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

15.01.2014 14:27, Shamil Murtazin:

In principle it is possible to use electronic documents.
Or require it printed scans?

15.01.2014 14:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, they generally can determine the external signs? .. Or cooking? .. =)

15.01.2014 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Butterfly, female Orgyia, appearance will not say exactly.

15.01.2014 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, there is still a proposal emerged. We have to do community tape recent additions of information about the kind of (for the latter type of comments to the photo). And now I began this Old scribbled a little and cast a "sober look" something I can not navayal: everything "goes into oblivion," with the exception of the last three updates on the main page).Disorder: inconvenient to work. Do it if it is technically possible.

14.01.2014 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right. Dates matched :)

14.01.2014 22:01, Andrey Ponomarev:

Vasily, no, I didn't misnote. That time we were together with kot_begemot in Izmailovo in 2012. :-)

14.01.2014 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, in the formLimenitis amphyssaneed to do exactly the permutation as we did before withNymphalis canace
Remove my photos http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3307 and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4477 Instead, paste and re-loaded http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26789 http://lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 26790 (keeping the rooms cleaned) are one and the same butterfly: just work on the bugs.
And accordingly to the page of the form should be put http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26731 (in nature) and http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 26789 (dry): it would be better in my opinion :)

14.01.2014 20:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Photographs found in the summer of 2013.
06.15.2013, Inzerskie zubchatki, Southern Urals.


Butterfly at all? ..

14.01.2014 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrey, didn't you happen to misnote the year? Then we wandered around together, April 21st 2013 :)
Just I've uploaded few captures from that stroll, thought you might have been wrong.

14.01.2014 14:06, Zoran Bozovic:

To Mr. Александр Жаков, intention is to show position of eggs,
for those who can not see them! *

14.01.2014 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.01.2014 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.01.2014 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.01.2014 12:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.01.2014 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

14.01.2014 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

14.01.2014 11:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Write Zryaninu it to you by our QC reset.

13.01.2014 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

This, no arrows, probably it is necessary in order to remove

13.01.2014 21:45, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You! *

13.01.2014 21:44, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You! *

13.01.2014 21:44, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You! *

13.01.2014 21:42, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You! *

13.01.2014 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my dreams .... probably ate there was vozzmozhnost just replace the photo with the preservation of the old rooms, it would be great.

13.01.2014 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. At the very frankly recently thought to reshoot and re-lay some of his collection of butterflies and the ability to delete the photo immediately, would not prevent :)

13.01.2014 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I can put it correctly, I spoke about the possibility of removal of the photos by the author. About forcible removal can not speak. Who looked uploaded your photos, delete function is disabled, and downloaded a long time, but the exhibited photos, no, there were only numbers.Peter or when excess does not delete the photo, even if we ask :) only in exceptional cases, when really full of trash. I mean, I stopped to collect butterflies or hurt me, and delete your photos. Mobiole At times this was a person leaving the now remove all the posts with photos or individual. I know.While it's certainly not fatal :)

13.01.2014 20:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Thanks to all who replied... Just can't tell the difference, that's it.

13.01.2014 19:26, Peter Khramov:

I want to add a section in the description of the species in Lepidoptera.ru - whether the view lists of protected and, if enabled, then what. Accordingly, it will be possible to watch this info on the description page, as well as selected species on it (ie, protected or unprotected show or protected here on this list here).
For this, the original data.If CITES all clear, then nashenskie Red Books (primarily regional, of itself) - on the contrary.
Because if anyone has scans of current at the moment the regional Red Book (or can capture pages devoted to butterflies) - Put pliz link in this topic or reset my e-mail main # lepidoptera.ru, and I was able to handle it all and make convenient sampling site for public use.
If anyone has thoughts on the undertaking itself - also write in the subject, it will be interesting.

13.01.2014 19:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oxicesta geographica / Diego Reggianti Oxicesta chamoenices / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.01.2014 19:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oxicesta geographica / Diego Reggianti Oxicesta chamoenices / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.01.2014 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, let me quote George:
"Yuri Semeykin, 01/12/2014 13:32
Hello, Peter! A couple of times I tried to download Minois dryas, but failed. This I have a glitch or website?
And yet for the title. This site Minois dryas there, but it is not in the Far East and determinants Korshunova. Maybe now the butterfly on the other.I called? "So I'm trying to prove that now validly Minois dryas I do not see nothing wrong: it is the debate" on the merits delivered in the subject matter. The site lives, and not on a dead spot :)

13.01.2014 16:11, Peter Khramov:

Lord, if you want to argue about classification - propose to do this in the appropriate section. Here is a reminder that some of the correct classification of butterflies in the world is not expected. A directory is important that the view can be found, and one title, and on another. And the site is now such a possibility exists.

13.01.2014 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, the site focuses mainly on the classification under which mezhunarodnuyu Dryad belongs to the genus Minois and expose this question because the two books very rash (may be taken there infa of the same fifties). Here is an excerpt from Sinev "a snack":)

13.01.2014 16:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Sorry, somehow I missed. Minois dryas in the determinant Korshunova is, stranitsa126

13.01.2014 15:43, Yuri Semejkin:

But now's not the fiftieth year, and classifiers are not asleep. They do not nap, but also scan your designated London 1992
But there are also our, with more recent publications determinants Korshunov 2002 and the Russian Far East to the insects of 2005 and there is this kind of reason is not.

13.01.2014 15:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks Basil! Separate articles in the internet at Minois dryas I saw. I was confused more. Why 2, with respect to determinants of fresh (not in separate articles), this kind of missing. That began to find out.
On the blue. Thanks for the offer, but I think it will bring me tomorrow.Take a look and if that peresnimu specific page about butterflies Primorye Territory, to me that's enough.

13.01.2014 15:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In order to stop the useless debate about tribal affiliation butterfly attach a scan of the book:
David Carter "Butterflies and Moths" . Dorling Kindersley Limited, 9 Henrietta Street, London, 1992

Well, in fairness add that in the "Key to the insects of the European part of the USSR" Plavilshchikov H, H, 1950 publication, it stands in the way Satyrus .But now's not the fiftieth year, and classifiers are not asleep :)

13.01.2014 14:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

13.01.2014 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well I'll try :)
Despite there are only 2 species in 17th region according to Synev, I think there is lycaon in this pic.

13.01.2014 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, but to negate the existence of the so-called minimum "sick mentality" must necessarily preduprezhat author before removing with the reasons. In this case, normal / adequate person to understand and take into account for the future. And somehow, even Petty is obtained when a person was working, my job lecturing on site ......And suddenly, his work suddenly goes into the garbage. People should respect each other. Of course this statement does not apply to double: they must be disposed of without any "rassharkivany": just the same as will be found.
This is my point of view.

13.01.2014 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'll start with line (actually they built the base site).
funet.fi: http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/minois/index.html#dryas
fauna europaea: http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=441562
Search result for Minois dryas : https://www.google.ru/search?client=opera&q=minois+dryas&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest
Well, in view of the above Sinev present for № 574. Speaking of Sinev: I can throw it to the post office if you need :)

13.01.2014 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Soon go home and reported as many, if in this whole issue, and elementary "gugleniya" does not help :) On your phone, it is now impossible to make PfP all due respect.

13.01.2014 9:09, Shamil Murtazin:

On health, Yuri! =)

13.01.2014 9:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Shamil Thanks! In this book really is.

13.01.2014 8:20, Shamil Murtazin:

In the blue there. I looked right after your post.
Now I found in the directory-determinant "Butterflies of South Ural" fellows and V. Gorbunov Olshvang
The network has its full electronic version. Here Dryads Page:
http://www.urral.ru/vid/507.htm

13.01.2014 8:11, Shamil Murtazin:

thanks a lot :)
signed photo collection ....

13.01.2014 8:08, Shamil Murtazin:

I suggest that the "waste" of the bugs this topic or stored in the "archive", a topic just to clean.

13.01.2014 5:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Well Basil! Please Ozvuchtte least a couple of more recent sources, which would have sounded like a butterfly Minois dryas. I looked (probably bad) springs of 2002 and 2005 namely: 1). YP Korshunov Butterflies of North Asia M 2002 Determinant nasekomyhDV and Russia Volume V, Part 5 Vladivostok Dal'nauka, 2005, and found nothing.It may be blue, but I do not. Where else ?

13.01.2014 4:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way, it is a very long time already in all the books Minois dryas . Yuri, it does differently is not called: you should probably use a more up to date at the moment literature.

13.01.2014 4:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Minois dryas (in the search box to type dryas ) it on the site and the entire conversation :)
Sorry that got into a discussion

13.01.2014 2:54, Peter Khramov:

Removed. I will try in the near future finally poreshat this problem.

13.01.2014 2:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Satire back :(

13.01.2014 2:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you. Peter and editing, in the flesh to the removal of old photos is the height tolerance. I applaud. If only no one with a sick mentality of the authors are not caught, and that will be offended and will remove all your photos.

13.01.2014 1:51, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I will try to make an automatic version. While manually cleaned up.

12.01.2014 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, you are likely too large foty. If not - send me a photo to e-mail, I'll see what it is. Regarding names - synonyms look at the website or just look for the name of the species in those books that you have - dryas-there probably will too, although perhaps in a different generic combinations.

12.01.2014 23:15, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, doubts. Please solve =)

12.01.2014 23:05, Peter Khramov:

Igor, only pics identified by other users get confirmed, or when you first upload a picture with a status "tentatively identified" and then have to move it to "confidently identified".

12.01.2014 22:53, Peter Khramov:

I did down too now has. Also, now it is not displayed on page 25 ph and 24 (multiple of 3, that one hangs phot not included).

12.01.2014 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, did you mean you doubted in the ID or what?

12.01.2014 22:47, Peter Khramov:

With black fotoy also corrected.

12.01.2014 22:45, Peter Khramov:

Gluck with satire corrected.

12.01.2014 21:52, Igor Ivannikov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2014 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

More sureness, please? :)

12.01.2014 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Erebia aethiops / Evgenie Bezgrebelnyj Erebia ligea / Eugene Matveev.

12.01.2014 18:37, Eugene Matveev:

Can't say sure, but it's rather E. melancholica more common in the Caucasian Alps.

12.01.2014 18:18, Eugene Matveev:

The fringe of its wings is evidently dotted which is not common in E. aethiops but rather E.ligea.

12.01.2014 16:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Please check again the ID...

12.01.2014 16:03, Shamil Murtazin:

The request line from the pages of duplicate photos and bottom .. (that: Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6)
Scroll through to the end, you do not find the photo - Returns to the top perelistnut ...

12.01.2014 15:15, Shamil Murtazin:

It seems wherever there put this picture satyr ...

12.01.2014 15:14, Shamil Murtazin:

genus Acleris - the same ...

12.01.2014 14:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Donacaula forficella / Vitaly Gumenuk Donacaula mucronella / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.01.2014 14:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Donacaula forficella / Vitaly Gumenuk Donacaula mucronella / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.01.2014 14:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

The genus moths Asthena same satyr in all windows.

12.01.2014 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, when you transfer pictures to redefine species on the pages of descriptions of species ostayutsyach photo overdetermined species. Can you make them automatic extinction :). In the meantime, it is necessary to correct manually on my last redefinition of butterflies.

12.01.2014 14:04, Yuri Semejkin:

He tried again. Same. He writes that the file has been successfully uploaded to the gallery site. But in the gallery or at LK file is not visible.

12.01.2014 14:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Enjoying the view: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/8760
In the panels on the right:

While no one of these types of photos on the site do not. And on the page itself forms no photos. Mystic.

12.01.2014 13:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Hello, Peter! A couple of times I tried to download Minois dryas, but failed. This I have a glitch or website?
And yet for the title. This site Minois dryas there, but it is not in the Far East and determinants Korshunova. Maybe now the butterfly on the other. Called?

12.01.2014 0:25, Shamil Murtazin:

I've been waiting for something new :)

11.01.2014 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add to compare. What it looks like any other butterfly:

11.01.2014 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I still today has caught this bug (previously seen, but did not catch). And that's when displaying "dead head" on the home page: photo black background instead. The browser Opera 12.16 (x64) is interesting: all of this?
Must-have poravilos:

11.01.2014 9:14, Artem Branshteyn:

Collected in Nizhny Novgorod region.

10.01.2014 23:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Noctua pronuba / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.01.2014 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Orthosia cruda / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Not identified.

10.01.2014 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Well, since I went to a booze, then you can leave the comments now not only to the species (and subspecies, and other types of morphs in the pages), but also to any supra-species taxa up to superfamily inclusive. Comments write pages to appropriate taxa, and you can even watch them in one section of the Community.

10.01.2014 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Fancy topic!

10.01.2014 22:57, Peter Khramov:

Now for the comments to fotam, types and themes of the Community there is an additional window - the translation into English. If you are nice to know the language and you want the English version of your commentary was just your unique or if you have time for that little alleviate the hard life of our interpreter - this box is for you.If you have used tags in your text (insert pictures, changed the font, etc.), the easiest way is to copy the entire Russian text with tags in the window of the English commentary, lyrics correct, and save the tags in the places where they were in the Russian version.Those who do not know the language or do not have time to translate, nothing to fear - the translation field to fill optional, and Leo continues to translate everything for you.
Well, as always, if anyone finds glitches / bugs / issues - reported.
ZYIn the comments, which you are transferred, not the lion, in the English version of the site will not be an asterisk with a footnote "Translated from the Russian version of the site."

10.01.2014 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Scopula geometrid, no chance to ID this properly as it's quite worn-out. :(

10.01.2014 21:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Asthena albulata / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov Not identified.

10.01.2014 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apamea remissa / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Mesapamea secalis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.01.2014 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apamea remissa / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Mesapamea secalis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.01.2014 19:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argyrotaenia ljungiana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.01.2014 18:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula immorata / Tentatively identified / Sergey Novitckiy Scopula tessellaria / Confidently identified / Tatyana Gordeeva.

10.01.2014 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

The uncertainty of the ID is connected with that the region is quite distant and there can be similar local species as well.

10.01.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula floslactata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Idaea nitidata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula floslactata / Natalia Demchenko Scopula nigropunctata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula floslactata / Vasiliy Feoktistov Scopula nigropunctata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2014 17:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

The uncertainty of the ID is connected with that the region is quite distant and there can be similar local species as well.

10.01.2014 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula floslactata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Scopula nigropunctata / Tentatively identified / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2014 16:21, Lev Bely:




This pic caused a great interest: excuse me, what is this? This terrific infernal thing outthrusting of a poor moth? Not the first come to mind. This is called coremata (Greek) which is originally means “feather duster”, an eversible scent gland of some male moths. Many of Arctiidae moths are proud owners of such gland.
Coremata of Chionarctia nivea male moth:

As leps don't live in a commune-style, side by side, it can be quite a task for them to find a proper mate of the same species. So they start “signal fires” launching pheromones into the air which are produced by that very magic gland. To spread pheromones around, the gland is ejected outwards. Some male moths own a gland really impressive in size.
Another work* on sex pheromones of Arctiidae moths Creatonotos transiens and Creatonotos gangis says: “coremata are huge, pneumatically eversible organs composed of two pairs of tubes, up to 37 mm long, each covered by ca. 3000 scent hairs (scales).”
Coremata can be even longer than the moth body and of different shapes, from a small ball to a long tube. Whilst hair help to spread pheromones around to attract females, males also wave their wings for a bigger covering. Curious that males hit females' heads with this very coremata. Well.
This organ is pumped up with blood or air. The pic above features a dead moth male which coremata gets pumped up with air from a pipette applied to a cavity in a moth body. Alive males pump up coremata with air intaking through the abdomen.
After a successful interconnection with a female that responsed to a pheromone call is done, coremata gets smaller in size whilst penis gets bigger. Still that's not the end of the story. Male has to hold female long enough to finish the mating process. Doesn't seem quite a sinecure.
If you happen to be entomologist, now it's time for doctor games. Study of the lepidoptera genitalia is of such great importance that there are plenty of tools today created only for that routine. And the most crucial parts are evidently hidden inside of an insect body... due to that very size loss. It can be rather tough to spread male genitalia as properly to examine essential elements.
However, some brainy Australian guys created this pump device for increasing insect genitalia. “The Phalloblaster inflates the genitalia with a stream of pressurized alcohol to create the same shape as when the insect was alive. The alcohol dehydrates and hardens the structure, so that once the process is over the genitalia remain inflated rather like miniature balloons. It makes them easier to study.”
By the way, phalloblaster is properly called vesica everter. But really, who needs fancy “everter” when you have phalloblaster?
Few more words about males and penises. Females of some species choose males by quantity of pheromones, body size and (!) coremata size. Many of males with coremata once were distasteful larvae due to alkaloids which they got of leaves of some toxic plants in the feeding stage. These alkaloids kept as well in imago body.
The quantity of alkaloids gained in the feeding larval stage corresponds with coremata size of an adult male as well as the quantity of pheromones produced, so more toxic males get a higher sexual rank that their average, not as toxic comrades. Part of the toxins are later transferred with a male sperm to a female during mating process and to ova which female lays later, for protection her and the offspring from predators. Naturally, females prefer males with a bigger coremata.
For those who have further interest in the interconnection between larval taste preferences, male attractiveness and female reaction, this book will be helpful: For Love of Insects by Thomas Eisner, father of chemical ecology, http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674018273. Another his book Secret Weapons tells how Utetheisa ornatrix uses toxins to deter off spiders and attract a mate: http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674024038&content=reviews.
Video to the book Secret Weapons:

*Sex pheromones of two Asian moths (Creatonotos transiens, C. gangis; Lepidoptera--Arctiidae): behavior, morphology, chemistry and electrophysiology. Wunderer H, Hansen K, Bell TW, Schneider D, Meinwald J.: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3817109.
Coremata in beautiful macro pics and terminology:
http://lepcourse.wikispaces.com/file/view/sex+scales.AZ.+aug.12.pdf.
По материалам Wired, http://www.wired.com
Фото: C. nivea, http://blog.zaq.ne.jp/insect/

10.01.2014 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not sure if I guessed the year right. Thanks. :)

10.01.2014 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0201-06-11 00:00:00 2010-06-11 00:00:00.

10.01.2014 15:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea rufaria / Sergey Novitckiy Idaea ochrata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2014 15:38, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Ha! Please correct the shot date...

10.01.2014 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea biselata / Vitaly Gumenuk Lomographa temerata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2014 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea aversata / Vitaly Gumenuk Idaea biselata / Basil Sergienko.

10.01.2014 2:15, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

10.01.2014 1:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lithosia quadra Euproctis similis.

10.01.2014 0:55, Peter Khramov:

Didn't get it. So moving to similis then?

10.01.2014 0:46, Peter Khramov:

Doubles who found removed. If someone else will find that this - write in the comments to fotam also cleaned up.
Zoran, okay, well, we're all to understand.

10.01.2014 0:44, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved, double deleted.

10.01.2014 0:43, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Evergestis extimalis Evergestis forficalis.

10.01.2014 0:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil Sergienko is also for Idaea serpentata.

10.01.2014 0:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok, solved then :)

09.01.2014 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

How could I only miss this message, been out for the last two weeks. I myself identify Zoran's specimens on lepiforum. Now Lepiforum even references with links to our and other websites when their leps have no photos.

09.01.2014 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Phalonidia contractana / Zoran Bozovic Clepsis spectrana / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Argyrotaenia ljungiana / Zoran Bozovic Phalonidia contractana / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tyta luctuosa / Zoran Bozovic Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 22:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hedya dimidiana / Zoran Bozovic Tyta luctuosa / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scoparia subfusca / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Eudonia mercurella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudonia mercurella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

All wrong and you can not always pinpoint the photos. How can we help you. :)

09.01.2014 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cool!!!

09.01.2014 21:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypsotropa unipunctella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 21:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Euxoa nigricans / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic Archanara dissoluta / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 21:08, Zoran Bozovic:

After applying comments, of all of You, i am absolutely confident in Moderator from Serbian forum. All mistakes are done by me, by copy/paste the names. I thank all of You and appologize for upseting You.
*

09.01.2014 21:03, Igor Sakhno:

:-))

09.01.2014 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

09.01.2014 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea serpentata / Zoran Bozovic Idaea ochrata / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2014 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra pyramidea / Zoran Bozovic Amphipyra berbera / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 20:53, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You! *

09.01.2014 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra pyramidea / Zoran Bozovic Amphipyra berbera / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 20:49, Zoran Bozovic:

Moderator is O.K., i made mistake by
copy/paste name. I appologize for this.
Brain kaput! *

09.01.2014 20:32, Zoran Bozovic:

I appologize for "mess"!

09.01.2014 18:37, Zoran Bozovic:

O.K. I did not see, it is changed.
Thank You all!

09.01.2014 18:28, Zoran Bozovic:

Will somebody confirm this., please.
Thank You!

09.01.2014 18:24, Zoran Bozovic:

Will somebody confirm this, please?!
Thank You *

09.01.2014 18:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

others should be checked :)

09.01.2014 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maria, is this moth big enough to be Syndemis musculana? If yes, this is it, otherwise others sould be checked.

09.01.2014 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Melanargia galathea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 17:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paramesia gnomana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 17:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loxostege sticticalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Horisme tersata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2014 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Carposina scirrhosella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypomecis roboraria / Zoran Bozovic Ectropis crepuscularia / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2014 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Ectropis crepuscularia / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2014 17:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Idaea albitorquata / Zoran Bozovic Idaea camparia / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2014 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oligia strigilis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula marginepunctata / Tentatively identified / Zoran Bozovic Idaea seriata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2014 15:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Disputable: one of these two.
http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/888-idaea-serpentata
http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/2084-idaea-ochrata
As you decide.......

09.01.2014 15:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Horisme vitalbata / Zoran Bozovic Philereme transversata / Eddy Verfaillie.

09.01.2014 15:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Idaea degeneraria / Vitaly Gumenuk Idaea rusticata / Eddy Verfaillie.

09.01.2014 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Panchrysia aurea / Confidently identified / Sergey Titov.

09.01.2014 15:21, Sergey Titov:

Alexandr, I did, there was similar aurata, page 139, and the very deaurata, page 141, which agrees the photo here.

09.01.2014 14:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia lactucae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia lactucae / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.01.2014 13:44, Zhanna Saripova: This species is identified correctly.

09.01.2014 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula nigropunctata / Vitaly Gumenuk Idaea straminata / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2014 12:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Lev Bely Leodonta zenobia / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.01.2014 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, anything else there? Did you check Vitt's catalogue?

09.01.2014 12:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epione vespertaria / Eddy Verfaillie Plagodis pulveraria / Basil Sergienko.

09.01.2014 11:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This was already identified.

09.01.2014 8:50, Sergey Titov:

Panchrysia deaurata (Esper 1787)

09.01.2014 2:23, Eddy Verfaillie:

I think this is ochrata.

09.01.2014 2:03, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Idaea rusticata. *

09.01.2014 1:18, Eddy Verfaillie:

Both comae as griseata are present in Estonia. As far as I know, only genital examination can give a certain determination. *

09.01.2014 0:44, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, thanks for the confirmations.

09.01.2014 0:29, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Philereme transversata. *

08.01.2014 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia subfuscata Eupithecia virgaureata.

08.01.2014 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cabera exanthemata / Vitaly Gumenuk Cabera pusaria / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia inturbata / Vitaly Gumenuk Eupithecia subfuscata / Basil Sergienko.

08.01.2014 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia inturbata / Vitaly Gumenuk Eupithecia subfuscata / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 23:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia linariata / Vitaly Gumenuk Eupithecia icterata / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 22:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cabera pusaria / Confidently identified Scopula immutata / Tentatively identified.

08.01.2014 22:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

How was it put to Cabera pusaria for anyway?

08.01.2014 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epione repandaria / Zoran Bozovic Epione vespertaria / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Epione repandaria Epione vespertaria.

08.01.2014 22:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cosmorhoe ocellata / Vitaly Gumenuk Xanthorhoe montanata / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 22:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chloroclystis v-ata / Vitaly Gumenuk Pasiphila rectangulata / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 22:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Chloroclystis v-ata / Vitaly Gumenuk Pasiphila rectangulata / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lythria cruentaria / Alexandr Zhakov Lythria purpuraria / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula immutata / Confidently identified / Eddy Verfaillie.

08.01.2014 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cabera pusaria / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

08.01.2014 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic Alexandr Zhakov.

08.01.2014 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Oligia versicolor Lacanobia contigua.

08.01.2014 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

08.01.2014 4:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

08.01.2014 3:12, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Please correct pupa to larva.

08.01.2014 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Well no. With standard subtitles all the rules. But when the movie subtitle is not complete, but there are some thread somewhere in the vast web, then they can be out of sync. If you absolutely do not sync, pause, and so different - Then it is all right, God bless him. But often the situation when during the whole movie the subtitles are lagging behind, say, for a couple of seconds.Usually it is easy to rule in the player settings, and in the MPC do not see ...

08.01.2014 0:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, and the sound does not lag behind the video? .. By the end of the video audio delay (subtitle) becomes longer? .. If so - the codec is not configured or crooked.
Help you can not - you have a "zoo" of codecs.
The most effective - to demolish everything again to put a new, proven package to-light for example.
Incidentally, the video player does not affect the performance of the codecs.Just some built their own codecs (or rather decoders).

07.01.2014 23:41, Peter Khramov:

I moved to MPC HC, all the rules, but I can not adjust the settings to synchronize subtitles. That is, for example, they are behind in the second one, I must correct. In the Commission's easily done in the MPC seems to be also relevant socket is, and how to twist - not to be seen. I faced anyone with that?

07.01.2014 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Gluck, there is such a thing. Bum deal.

07.01.2014 19:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio zalmoxis Papilio antimachus.

07.01.2014 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio zalmoxis Papilio antimachus.

07.01.2014 19:35, Shamil Murtazin:

The photo is signed with "antimahus". zalmoxis is wrong.

07.01.2014 19:35, Shamil Murtazin:

The photo is signed with "antimahus". zalmoxis is wrong.

07.01.2014 18:05, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, lamps everything is OK, the trap should be ready in a couple of weeks.

07.01.2014 18:04, Peter Khramov:

Please try to compete with desync (to transfers have remained not much), if you do not come - will be through options. But for those who want to write directly in English take this opportunity, too, are blind ...
ZYThe site was a big break with translations, and in addition, previously had almost no posts in English, and now there, so now would be a little fuss, but I think it is reparable.

07.01.2014 17:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apamea sordens / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 17:43, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hidari irava?

07.01.2014 16:00, Shamil Murtazin:

I looked lepidoptera.pro
At first sight not seen "synchronized" comment as if it were two separate versions of the same site.
Probably, it is necessary to consider the possibility of commenting through, and only later - the translation, with the ability to view the source code.
Clash of languages ​​will anyway."Isolation" of sites that can not be avoided. Later necessarily appear inconsistencies and errors in the timing (because of manual control).
As an option - registered users can see all the comments for this picture. The rest - only the comments of their language.

07.01.2014 14:46, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You!!! *

07.01.2014 14:42, Zoran Bozovic:

Yes, sorry, 66 years, brain chocked! *

07.01.2014 14:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Time!

07.01.2014 14:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, okay. Only, now doubles went from our European friends :) Life is every day more fun ........

07.01.2014 14:11, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You, Sir. *

07.01.2014 13:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No pondering here :)

07.01.2014 13:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia trabealis / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

07.01.2014 13:30, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I poudalyal that you asked, should now be all the rules.

07.01.2014 13:20, Peter Khramov:

Hm. Why mess?.. When a comment is translated by a professional translator, such comment is marked with a special note, and when some user just comments directly in English in Russian version, that will be shown without any marks indicating that it was written originally by user. The latter is absolutely freewill, no obligations to translate comments if someone (me, for one) doesn't speak English quite well.

07.01.2014 13:18, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, so what eventually no ID?

07.01.2014 12:53, Zoran Bozovic:

see here!
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acontia_Trabealis

07.01.2014 12:38, Peter Khramov:

Zhanna, if the photo didn't get attached to the species during upload or later editing info in your personal account, it can happen due to the species belongs to another genus according to the website taxonomy. E.g., this pic of yours was named as Satyrus briseis whilst it's called Chazara briseis on the website. In such cases you should enter just the second part of the species name, here, briseis, and use autosuggestion.

07.01.2014 12:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Chazara briseis.

07.01.2014 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No need in separate field. I just took this moth out of the admin panel not once :) So I wrote in English then. If everyone starts commenting in English as well, there will be such a mess. Should be only one who takes care of translations.

07.01.2014 9:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Site of raznousym http://talanov.kirov.ru/?p=1368

07.01.2014 8:59, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, please don't comment in English in Russian version. Foreign users won't see them anyway. For those who want to comment also in English along with Russian there will be individual field later.

07.01.2014 2:59, Peter Khramov:

Here also...

07.01.2014 2:59, Peter Khramov:

Here please also comment.

07.01.2014 2:59, Peter Khramov:

Please confirm who can.

07.01.2014 2:58, Peter Khramov:

Here also confirmation needed.

07.01.2014 2:57, Peter Khramov:

Folks please confirm?

07.01.2014 2:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.01.2014 2:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

07.01.2014 2:53, Peter Khramov:

So confirming?

07.01.2014 2:52, Peter Khramov:

Here also.

07.01.2014 2:52, Peter Khramov:

Guys please comment?

07.01.2014 2:52, Peter Khramov:

Anyone say anything?

07.01.2014 2:50, Peter Khramov:

Who might comment?

07.01.2014 2:50, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, didn't you change your opinion?

07.01.2014 2:35, Peter Khramov:

Comments only now translated from the English version (Lepidoptera.pro), so lift it higher.

07.01.2014 0:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Igor Sakhno Sergey Didenko.

06.01.2014 23:39, Igor Sakhno:

Should be Sergey Didenko then.

06.01.2014 23:36, Igor Sakhno:

Was IDed on molbiol by Sergey (?)

06.01.2014 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Igor Sakhno Sergey Didenko.

06.01.2014 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I know who's this Sergey :)

06.01.2014 23:20, Igor Sakhno:

Identified by Sergey (?)

06.01.2014 23:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Igor Sakhno Svyatoslav Knyazev.

06.01.2014 23:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Igor Sakhno Sergei Kotov.

06.01.2014 23:10, Igor Sakhno:

Identified by S. Kotov.

06.01.2014 23:08, Igor Sakhno:

Identified by S. Knyazev.

06.01.2014 0:37, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

06.01.2014 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please make a note about who exactly said that on molbiol as many of the molbiol folks (including your humble servant) also author here. Will be easier to move :)

06.01.2014 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acerbia alpina / Igor Sakhno Acerbia seitzi / Sergei Kotov.

05.01.2014 23:37, Igor Sakhno:

They said on molbiol that this one was seitzi, of the same genus

05.01.2014 20:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Bug is not a bug ...
I do a search of all kinds in the South Ural region.
The issue of double the same form with a Russian name and without.
When you click on a link descriptions do not differ from each other.
(I hope the picture is inserted)

05.01.2014 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

05.01.2014 18:10, Igor Sakhno:

Whoah, what a merry villica!

05.01.2014 17:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Larva

05.01.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

05.01.2014 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Neozephyrus japonicus Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Neozephyrus japonicus Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Neozephyrus japonicus Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Neozephyrus japonicus Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Neozephyrus japonicus Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Neozephyrus japonicus Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will get the whole group done right now.

05.01.2014 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Neozephyrus japonicus Neozephyrus brillantinus.

05.01.2014 16:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Seems this one should be moved to Neozephyrus brillantinus Staudinger (aurorinus by Kuznetsov). It develops in Quercus mongolica where the larva was found and fed on.
As for N. japonicus, it has no discal hatches downside its wings and develops in alder tree.

05.01.2014 13:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.01.2014 13:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Lymantria marginalis / Confidently identified / Male / Anna Gerasimova.

05.01.2014 13:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lymantria marginalis / Tentatively identified / Anna Gerasimova.

05.01.2014 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebus crepuscularis / Confidently identified / Anna Gerasimova.

05.01.2014 12:57, Yuri Semejkin:

According to shovel. Rhode Hypena http://images.yandex.ru/yandsearch?text=Hypena&stype=image

05.01.2014 12:01, Anna Gerasimova:

Erebus crepuscularis

05.01.2014 11:03, Anna Gerasimova:

Lymantria marginalis male?

05.01.2014 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Spodoptera exigua / Zoran Bozovic Acronicta rumicis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.01.2014 10:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tired of waiting :) Grounds for moving: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acronicta_Rumicis

05.01.2014 10:39, Anna Gerasimova:

Lymantria marginalis female?

04.01.2014 23:49, Anna Gerasimova:

and even better way http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/contents.php

04.01.2014 23:47, Anna Gerasimova:

http://www.mothsofborneo.com/

04.01.2014 15:40, Zoran Bozovic:

Hyphantria cunea!

04.01.2014 3:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Or as a less clear variant, Subacronicta megacephala... You are to decide...

04.01.2014 3:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta rumicis, IMHO. Wait before moving. Other opinions needed.

04.01.2014 3:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hoplodrina superstes / Zoran Bozovic Anarta trifolii / Dmitry Borisyuk.

04.01.2014 0:54, Dmitry Borisyuk:

This is not Hoplodrina superstes, but again Anarta trifolii

04.01.2014 0:49, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Vague doubts bother me. Doesn't look like Spodoptera exigua...

03.01.2014 20:53, Igor Sakhno:

Might it be the same, only worn-out?

03.01.2014 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eastern comrades annealed. Fished and it is necessary to: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26516
Flowers here, too, has nothing to do even with the uncertain, unknown whose egg :)

03.01.2014 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Smerinthus ocellata / Igor Sakhno.

03.01.2014 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Smerinthus ocellata it is, clearly. Moving.

03.01.2014 18:56, Igor Sakhno:

Can there be something but ocellata in Poland?

03.01.2014 17:20, Igor Sakhno:

Rhyparia amurensis. Maybe there is some more adequate its name.

03.01.2014 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Label?

03.01.2014 16:43, Igor Sakhno:

Share on definition. Take a doubt due to the blurred picture of the front wings (rather spotty).

03.01.2014 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Euplagia quadripunctaria / Zoran Bozovic Opisthograptis luteolata / Igor Sakhno.

03.01.2014 14:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, indeed...

03.01.2014 14:43, Igor Sakhno:

Whoops, where it's happened to have come by!

03.01.2014 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I want to make an offer to the poster that you should write the exact species names when uploading photos to the site.
For example: Hypomecis punctinalis is written that way, and not punctialis ; Chloroclystis v-ata is written with a hyphen, and not v ata .Compliance with these rules you will greatly facilitate the work of the moderators so as photos with the misspelled Latin names are automatically placed on the moderation and you have to correct. Over the past couple of days and really I forgot how many times did this. Careful, please.

03.01.2014 3:08, Ozgur Kocak:

Hyperlais dulcinalis? *

03.01.2014 3:07, Zoran Bozovic:

Euproctis similis!

03.01.2014 2:57, Zoran Bozovic:

This should be Hypomecis punctinalis!? *

03.01.2014 2:25, Zoran Bozovic:

You are right. My mistake! *

02.01.2014 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

02.01.2014 21:42, Eddy Verfaillie:

For me, it is Lythria purpuraria.

02.01.2014 21:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is female.

02.01.2014 21:25, Eddy Verfaillie:

Certainly not linariata. I think it is icterata.

02.01.2014 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now only Petr can correct this.

02.01.2014 21:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

(Wileman & South, 1921)

02.01.2014 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To Zoran Bozovic: it is subspecies Phycitodes albatella reliquella (Dyar, 1904) according to the classification adopted by the site.

02.01.2014 21:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Yeah, I saw 1921 as well...
Lepidoptera of Thailand / Ahmet Ömer Koçak; Muhabbet Kemal
Daddala brevicauda (Wileman & South,1921)
http://www.academia.edu/1782777/Kocak_A.O._and_M.Kemal_2010_Lepidoptera_of_Thailand._Cesa_News_60_1-184_37_figs

02.01.2014 20:47, Eddy Verfaillie:

I think this is subfuscata.

02.01.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I got this species databased using info right from mothsofborneo.com. The name's there confusing, it says Wileman & South; Holloway 1976 whilst in other sources it's plainly Wileman & South, no description year. But on the same mothsofborneo it has also synonym Sypna brevicauda Wileman & South, 1921. Devil knows what's this?

02.01.2014 20:20, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Pasiphila rectangulata.

02.01.2014 20:19, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Pasiphila rectangulata.

02.01.2014 20:15, Shamil Murtazin:

May I help something...
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/sypnini/sypnini_4_2.php
http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/120100#page/276/mode/2up

02.01.2014 20:07, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Xanthorhoe montanata.

02.01.2014 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

02.01.2014 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So did it (couldn't find more reliable info). If something's wrong, will get it corrected.

02.01.2014 18:20, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is pusaria.

02.01.2014 18:09, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Scopula caricaria.

02.01.2014 18:09, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is Scopula immutata.

02.01.2014 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who described this species Daddala brevicauda Wileman & South; Holloway 1976 ? Can't get where it came from and where to put it in the database.

02.01.2014 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is no such author in the website list, so I can't put him as identifier from outside. Such are the rules, Andrey, there's sadly nothing to do. The author of the pic can add a comment to this photo with the name of the identifier.

02.01.2014 17:01, Andrey Ponomarev:

Vasya, this was IDed by Axel Steiner according to that link.)))

02.01.2014 16:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acronicta rumicis / Zoran Bozovic Anarta trifolii / Dmitry Borisyuk.

02.01.2014 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What's with the moderator on that webforum? This is indeed Anarta trifolii. Here's the right webforum: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Anarta_Trifolii. Moving then...

02.01.2014 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dyspessa salicicola ?

02.01.2014 16:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dyspessa sp. (Cossidae) Who of us is good in this?

02.01.2014 15:49, Ozgur Kocak:

Need underside of the wings.

02.01.2014 15:48, Ozgur Kocak:

Also underside needed.

02.01.2014 15:43, Ozgur Kocak:

Pieris napi (pseudorapea). But according to location and altitude may be bryoniae??

02.01.2014 15:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Grounds here:
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=177650

02.01.2014 15:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodostrophia sieversi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.01.2014 13:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And remove nafik fly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/26199 I wrote there, and duplicated here, so as not to get lost :)

02.01.2014 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

These four species are now added again and carried to the photo. But too much should be removed. I'm on the pages that you want to delete wrote.

02.01.2014 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Minucia bimaculata / Confidently identified / Ozgur Kocak.

02.01.2014 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, let it be then :)

02.01.2014 11:05, Andrey Ponomarev:

Already IDed. :-)
http://lepiforum.de/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=74741

02.01.2014 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Zygaena punctum / Tentatively identified / Ozgur Kocak Not identified.

02.01.2014 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moving to not identified. Grounds here:
http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=475943&view=findpost&p=1457566
It was originally put as Zygaena punctum, obviously fault.

02.01.2014 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

But if it's in Turkey for anyway?

02.01.2014 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Or rather more correct Zygaena (Mesembrynus) rubicundus (Hübner, [1817]) : http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki_vgl.pl?Zygaena_Rubicundus

02.01.2014 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'd see it more Zygaena purpuralis (Brünnich, 1763)
Any other suggestions more?

01.01.2014 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aloa marginata / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.01.2014 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Igor, thanks. This is indeed double: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/8828
Petr, I think this pic should be deleted.

01.01.2014 19:01, Igor Sakhno:

This photo is also there (in forficalis). Vitaly Ivanovitch seems to have secured ;)

01.01.2014 18:54, Igor Sakhno:

Looks similar to Evergestis forficalis

01.01.2014 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

01.01.2014 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apparently worn-out. Moving to uncertain, I see.

01.01.2014 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's rather variable: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1060-alcis-repandatus

01.01.2014 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alcis repandata / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

01.01.2014 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.01.2014 18:08, Igor Sakhno:

Is it really the same species?

01.01.2014 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, we need to understand here is this genus: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/14100
Specifically, with views: Ischyja subreducta Holloway in 2005; Ischyja paraplesius Rothschild, 1920; Ischyja ferrifracta (Walker, 1864); Ischyja marapok Holloway, 2005. It is not possible to attach a photo from admin: the search engine sees. See for yourself how they are written in the classification.

01.01.2014 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Phycitodes albatella reliquella (Dyar, 1904) according to the website taxonomy.

01.01.2014 15:13, Eddy Verfaillie:

It's a male. For this species the difference between male and female is very manifest. *

01.01.2014 15:11, Eddy Verfaillie:

it's a male. *

01.01.2014 14:55, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is obviously vespertaria.

01.01.2014 14:54, Eddy Verfaillie:

This is obviously vespertaria.

01.01.2014 14:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes clear: I just wrote it from such komenty taken. Comes a new author and starts zhmakat wherever falling :) first stood "male and female", and only then, I order navёl.

01.01.2014 13:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil, there is the main thing - to glitches fotami!

31.12.2013 16:34, Alex Dumchus:

Happy New Year! I wish all new journeys, new discoveries, new species, new photos, and of course health. And so in my heart fluttering butterflies.
"Man in something like a butterfly. It is also, like the butterfly he lives three stages, but in a different sequence: first, as a caterpillar - zhret- Wed .., Working-evolving, on the second, like a butterfly - enjoying life, on the third - zakuklivaetsya the ground. In some people, the second stage can be skipped. "
A.Dumchus

31.12.2013 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, but it's just seen the author experimented with the buttons. Well, I had to prune. A comment in this case the machine breaks.

30.12.2013 23:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acontia trabealis / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

30.12.2013 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Mythimna l-album / Evgeny Komarov.

30.12.2013 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nightmare :)

30.12.2013 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hypsopygia costalis Timandra comae.

30.12.2013 21:24, Dmitry Borisyuk:

This is not Hypsopygia costalis. Bug, apparently!

30.12.2013 20:55, Shamil Murtazin:

This is rather hint for Zoran... sometimes misses and doesn't label them.

30.12.2013 20:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Why possible, if increase saturation of the red channel in Photoshop.

30.12.2013 20:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Here, too, "cockroach" I have bred http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25651 when viewing small size see here take this picture http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25937, but if you unfold - it's OK. Although embarrassed by Basil photo comments - "12.19.2013 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Data on the photos changed.
Imprecise definition / Male and female → type undefined / Imago "Which male and female - I see 1 copy.moth like!

30.12.2013 20:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Acontia trabealis

30.12.2013 20:08, Evgeny Komarov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25320 - Peter! I when viewed in small size see ... a fly, and if you unfold - all normality butterfly!

30.12.2013 20:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Mythimna l-album

30.12.2013 19:57, Evgeny Komarov:

No similar ones!

30.12.2013 19:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Acontia trabealis?

30.12.2013 18:35, Jan van Holten:

Concerning Polia nebulosa, take a look at the site www.lepiforum.de for this species. I am missing the dark stripes on the flanks and also the diamond-shaped pattern on top.

30.12.2013 18:12, Jan van Holten:

This is not Saturium spini, it is a completly different species. I will try to find it when I am done with uploading later.

30.12.2013 17:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved to uncertain so far. No label (: If needed, will move it to maura. It's so bad people don't pin the location label together with a very specimen itself: this is primary whilst one with the ID is secondary. Gentlemen, let me quote this: "Collection is labels".

30.12.2013 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

30.12.2013 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's anything but C. astris, no doubt. This is it http://insectamo.ru/larva/98-hete/noctuidae/1313-cucullia-asteris, no need to check the location.

30.12.2013 10:54, Yuri Semejkin:

I think, it's way far from Cucullia asteris. Location doesn't fit. According to the Key to the insects of the Far East of the USSR, there is no asteris in Amur region. I checked the catalogue, it mentions 35—37 regions, neither there.
I'd like to ask the author, Dina, could you please recall on which plant you shot this larva?

30.12.2013 1:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No such criteria. Needed however.

30.12.2013 0:46, Igor Sakhno:

Wow, what a great red tincture it has! Is it possible to get it artificially?

30.12.2013 0:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Is there any flag/tag for such pics?

30.12.2013 0:26, Igor Sakhno:

I hardly can clear this up as I got this moth with some peculiar "label" attached, showing only some number, notebook by which was obviously lost.

29.12.2013 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In addition, it's rather first (aberration).

29.12.2013 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be aberration (deviation from the common colour) or melanism, rare but possible. Here's two illustrations of mine:
http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/22814
http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/22271

29.12.2013 21:19, Shamil Murtazin:

There is no white at all...

29.12.2013 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Angerona prunaria / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.12.2013 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Svyatoslav Knyazev.

29.12.2013 13:00, Wachek Jaros: This species is identified correctly.

29.12.2013 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xestia c-nigrum / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

29.12.2013 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As I see, no suggestions :) Moving.

28.12.2013 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Miltochrista miniata / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

28.12.2013 21:43, Irina Nikulina:

Miltochrista miniata, I think

28.12.2013 20:34, Shamil Murtazin:

I saw it by the author's remark, couldn't help leaving it not IDed. So smile )

28.12.2013 19:14, Irina Nikulina:

Yury, neither head, nor the fringe perplex me. Moreover, I see twin brother (or sister) of mine recently added here, see http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/23302. With the same head outward, just check.

28.12.2013 18:44, Peter Khramov:

Fault during upload.

28.12.2013 18:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hypsopygia costalis Timandra comae.

28.12.2013 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Leucoptera spartifoliella / Zoran Bozovic Heliothis viriplaca / Andrey Ponomarev.

28.12.2013 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1326-heliothis-viriplaca

28.12.2013 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

28.12.2013 18:13, Andrey Ponomarev:

Heliothis viriplaca

28.12.2013 18:11, Andrey Ponomarev:

It's not Leucoptera spartifoliella. There is some mistake. This is some Noctuidae.

28.12.2013 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.12.2013 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.12.2013 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'd say, this is Xestia c-nigrum :) Any other suggestions?

28.12.2013 17:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Despite all the author's stands about sure IDs of the photos, this is definitely not Hypsopygia costalis, and even not Pyralidae at all. As for Timandra comae, it's absent in Jugoslavia according to the Catalogue, or it just wasn't catalogued. This image of Hypsopygia costalis still differs from Timandra comae version. Ira, look at its head, it's stretched, which we can't see in any photos of mine, neither in yours. It's hidden everywhere, can't be seen from above, also the fringe is of another colour. Only might be some ssp?

28.12.2013 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C happy to join in the congratulations! Photographer new, wonderful pictures of butterflies! Entomologist finds new insects! And the main thing for all of us: progress in the development of this site! Summer is just around the corner, ladies and gentlemen! And the New Year in my mind day by turning a terrible and uncomfortable winter to bright and happy summer.
Congratulations:

28.12.2013 16:27, Irina Nikulina:

This Timandra seems to have happened to be put in Hypsopygia costalis. This is rather Timandra comae.

28.12.2013 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Thyatira batis / Tentatively identified / Maria Pozdnova Not identified.

28.12.2013 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Should be annuled :) Will do in a sec.

28.12.2013 15:13, Peter Khramov:

So where to move? Or just to uncertain so far?

28.12.2013 15:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Heliothela wulfeniana Anania terrealis.

28.12.2013 15:04, Peter Khramov:

The author had the right ID, just it wasn't hitched during image upload.

28.12.2013 15:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

28.12.2013 13:16, Zoran Bozovic:

This is not Heliothela wulfeniana.
This is Anania terrealis. *

28.12.2013 11:27, Zoran Bozovic:

Cydia pomonella

28.12.2013 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Definitely not Thyatira batis. Polia nebulosa (Hufnagel, 1766) as a variant (to dig out farther): http://insectamo.ru/larva/98-hete/noctuidae/1436-polia-nebulosa Whilst here is T. batis: http://insectamo.ru/larva/89-hete/drepanidae/852-thyatira-batis

28.12.2013 10:25, Shamil Murtazin:

It turns lepidopterist long time :)
I found a photo to mobile =)

28.12.2013 10:23, Shamil Murtazin:

Directly say I like ...
His English level is difficult to assess, especially on topics lepidopterist)
Yes, in most cases, be able to communicate directly.

28.12.2013 10:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Cydia pomonella? =)

28.12.2013 0:34, Peter Khramov:

Now, after a significant transfer of comments are again beginning to be translated into English. Question: Does anyone have a desire to register with his comments immediately, and the English version? Thus, you can fully convey the author's wording (if you speak English), and the translator will have less work. But yes, it's some gimor.And yes, you need to know the language very well. Write your opinion, if you want, I will do in a daw LC, wishing to be able to use this feature.

28.12.2013 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Synchro swimming!

28.12.2013 0:20, Dmitry Borisyuk:

This is not at all Acronicta rumicis, I see Anarta trifolii instead.

27.12.2013 23:59, Lev Bely:

Join us! Good luck in the New Year, and thank you for such a unique place in the network. Beau glass :)

27.12.2013 23:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh, here I'm stuck why can't move it myself :)

27.12.2013 23:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antitype chi / Confidently identified / Jan van Holten.

27.12.2013 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why If Jan put 100%, then move. Time will tell.

27.12.2013 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, nice one :)

27.12.2013 22:20, Peter Khramov:

I think our Polish colleague didn't notice the location. Whatever, anything happens...

27.12.2013 21:59, Irina Nikulina:

What to do with location? According to Synev, fuliginosa isn't distributed far 34th region.... Whilst this is Primorye, 40th region.

27.12.2013 21:35, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila geniculea / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

27.12.2013 21:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Notocelia roborana / Confidently identified / Zoran Bozovic.

27.12.2013 21:10, Peter Khramov:

Um?

27.12.2013 21:10, Peter Khramov:

Moving?

27.12.2013 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Anybody please confirm?

27.12.2013 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Any thoughts?

27.12.2013 21:08, Peter Khramov:

Any alternatives?..

27.12.2013 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, did you hear that? :--)

27.12.2013 19:15, Peter Khramov:

Amazing start!

27.12.2013 19:07, Irina Nikulina:

Heading straight forward to 10,000))!

27.12.2013 18:47, Peter Khramov:

I join in the congratulations! Give us 10 thousand types illustrated in the next year! -))
ZY When inserted Fautua, just need the address of an image file, not the page is phot. Now I corrected this case in the previous comments of Irina.

27.12.2013 18:38, Peter Khramov:

Right now the people began to write a commentary on the English version. For the time being they will not be translated in real time, so please pay attention to a little earlier comments in the film.

27.12.2013 18:37, Peter Khramov:

Jan, you do everything right. Just identified photos also need to be confirmed, mistakes happen :--)

27.12.2013 18:32, Irina Nikulina:

27.12.2013 18:32, Irina Nikulina:

Dear friends! Happy New Year to you! Good luck, prosperity and interesting life of the site and all its authors! Great shot, beautiful moments, interesting trips, new discoveries, precise definitions, adding to the collection! Versions conceived! Be all healthy and happy !!!Outgoing year was my first year on the site) I would like to thank everyone who helped determine gave constructive advice, support - all who are not indifferent to the site!)

27.12.2013 18:26, Peter Khramov:

Yang, the mention of the flag - just an oversight in the interface of the English version of the site. He used (check) was relevant, now it is not, and will be subject to editing a raw explicitly before loading images.
ZY People, answer pliz something about the determinants of our foreign colleagues.

27.12.2013 9:32, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You!

27.12.2013 9:30, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You *

27.12.2013 1:06, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You!

26.12.2013 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, see "undone" when they are migrating. Or it may seem. So I repeat ...

26.12.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov:

In terms of?

26.12.2013 15:59, Shamil Murtazin:

ambush :D

26.12.2013 14:05, Jan van Holten:

Hello,

As promised I submitted yesterday my first 71 photo's to the website including a subspecies like Lycaena dispar rutila.
All images are fully edited including sharpening and they are all of a large size so others can enlarge them. Concerning ''editing'' you mention something like a ''Please do not edit'' box, but I cannot find it on the website. Do I need it or is it something I don't have to worry about???

Also, do you know a good indentification guide about butterflies and caterpillars of eastern europe and Russia?????

Thank you and greetings,
Jan van Holten, Holland *

26.12.2013 2:48, Igor Sakhno:

Here is the cracker!..

26.12.2013 1:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely this moth fits better here.

26.12.2013 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Agonopterix curvipunctosa Exaeretia ciniflonella.

25.12.2013 23:28, Andrey Sazykin:

Peter Buchner (buchner.324@tele2.at) told me that he deemed this Exaeretia ciniflonella. Any thoughts on that?

25.12.2013 22:16, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, thanks for the comments. As for the pop-up labels - boom rule. As for the catalog - you need to output, otherwise the very comfort and understanding among the people will be less, but it worked so quickly - it will continue to optimize the ...

25.12.2013 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Moderators do not have a judge in the last resort, but too much is not exactly. Therefore, the more evidence of determination, the better (more comfortable, intuitive) user. And such acknowledgment not only prevent, but also necessary, including and for species that are "determined exactly."Well, and the fact that from time to time there is a flash mob on fote a thread Peacock day with a series of evidence - do not worry, and even makes a humorous little diversity.

25.12.2013 13:59, Jan van Holten:

For sure this it is not Thyatira batis. That is a complete other species that you will find almost only on plants of stinging nettle (Urtica). That is my experience from north-east Poland.
(Urtica)

25.12.2013 13:50, Jan van Holten:

Take a look at my website: www.natuurfotografiejan.nl. I photographed three different species which are all very different.

25.12.2013 13:45, Jan van Holten:

Excuse for my comments, I thought I looked at the map with uncertain cases.

25.12.2013 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, great. I tied her to a group :)

25.12.2013 10:56, Peter Khramov:

All is ready.

25.12.2013 7:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, I agree, not thought through to the end. Therefore, the suggested thought.
Simply, there are photos that have already been identified "Reinforced Concrete", in the sense that there are no claims to the moderators opredelitelstvu. City separate flag for that of course is not entirely correct.It may be necessary to reconsider the entire logic of identification and, accordingly, the passage of the attributes of photos this thorny path :)
Partially I agree with Vasily that comment enough.

25.12.2013 7:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I was referring to the "right type defined" once again. After all, if the type is defined correctly additional komenty this is not absolutely necessary.

25.12.2013 1:26, Peter Khramov:

Basil, click "type defined incorrectly" is long gone.
Shamil, as much as possible to hide the button "Submit the form" for photons, the kind of which is defined? For them it exists - to confirm that the definition is correct.

24.12.2013 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter and me to task :) Here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/15115 need to delete the photo # 3135 and the new photo # 25733 assign number. Similarly to what has recently been done with M. halimede. On the page of the form should be changed only dried butterfly photo (shot in nature and let it remain as he was).

24.12.2013 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This button is in my opinion should be removed altogether: clog unnecessary komentami page with the photo. It is always possible to write that kind of defined incorrectly (by providing its own version) and without this key. Atavism IMHO :)

24.12.2013 20:31, Shamil Murtazin:

Optimizing database query.
When you go to http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog can not search the empty criteria. Then the server will not have the wool 77,000 species.
I do not know how this critical load, but there is a delay.

24.12.2013 20:24, Shamil Murtazin:

More optimization.
Hiding the button "Submit the form" if the type is defined.
Over hiding when "inaccurate" Definitely worth considering, but I think, too, is to hide - if suddenly there is an error or there is strong evidence - you can always write a comment.

24.12.2013 19:41, Jan van Holten:

I think this is Dypterygia scabriuscula.

24.12.2013 19:35, Jan van Holten:

Zygaena lonicerae for sure I think

24.12.2013 19:32, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:32, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:31, Jan van Holten:

Sideridis rivularis

24.12.2013 19:27, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:27, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:26, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:26, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:25, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:24, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:23, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:18, Jan van Holten:

In my opinion all pictures from Andrey Ponomarev, concerning Eurois occulta, are correctly indentified. The whole series.

24.12.2013 19:16, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:15, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:15, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2013 19:10, Jan van Holten:

Syngrapha microgamma looks very much like this.

24.12.2013 19:02, Jan van Holten:

Cucullia asteris, please provide possibility to enlarge the picture. But for 98% sure.

24.12.2013 18:55, Jan van Holten:

Antitype chi, without any doubt. 100%

24.12.2013 18:44, Jan van Holten:

Phragmatobia fuliginosa I think.

24.12.2013 18:42, Jan van Holten:

I think this is Phragmatobia fuliginosa. If possible, please provide the opportunity to enlarge the photo.

24.12.2013 0:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Artena inversa.

23.12.2013 23:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why, I've got the info since long and not from the web :) This male was brought from New Guinea. You are to decide which ssp. Personally, I see Autolocus. Correct me if I'm wrong then I'll remove it.

23.12.2013 22:48, Dmitry Borisyuk:

In my unprofessional opinion, this specimen looks more likely to be a nominative ssp. rather than autolycus. I checked there: http://en.butterflycorner.net/Papilio-ulysses-Mountain-Blue.schwalbenschwanz100.0.html.

23.12.2013 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter kosyachki should be corrected.
1. Remove the inactive form of Lacera nyarlathotepi Zilli & Holloway, 2005
2. Remove the comma after the generic name in Amphigonia, hepatizans.
Thank you.

23.12.2013 22:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lacera nyarlathotepi.

23.12.2013 15:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphigonia, hepatizans.

23.12.2013 15:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pardon me: didn't check the admin panel.

23.12.2013 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Irina Nikulina Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.12.2013 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why, they keep well in the admin panel :) I'm at work now, not eager to do it from my phone...

23.12.2013 10:47, Peter Khramov:

Or rather the Uploaded images section in your personal account...

23.12.2013 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Check the admin panel sometimes :)

23.12.2013 8:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Calyptra minuticornis (Guenée, 1852).

23.12.2013 8:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Guenee, 1852.

23.12.2013 8:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zilli A. & Holloway J.D. 2005.

23.12.2013 8:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Generally, all the species I added are identified. Only species names lack above the photos.

23.12.2013 3:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Boris Lariushin.

23.12.2013 3:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum corythus / Tentatively identified / Igor Sakhno.

23.12.2013 3:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum corythus / Tentatively identified / Igor Sakhno.

23.12.2013 2:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Dmitriy Pozhogin Dysgonia crameri / Irina Nikulina.

23.12.2013 0:20, Igor Sakhno:

Macroglossum corythus ?

22.12.2013 23:53, Igor Sakhno:

Macroglossum corythus, probably? http://www1.ala.org.au/gallery2/v/Sphingidae/Macroglossumcorythus/macroglossum_corythus_01.jpg.html

22.12.2013 23:53, Irina Nikulina:

This is Bastilla crameri
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/15_EREBINAE/031_Bastilla/Bastilla%20crameri/Bastilla%20crameri.htm
http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-15-16/ophiusini/ophiusini_8_11.php. Though here it's Dysgonia crameri (Moore, 1885).

22.12.2013 22:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What's the difference between them?

22.12.2013 22:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Identified by Boris Laryushin.

22.12.2013 22:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Eurema simulatrix / Lev Bely Eurema hecabe / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

22.12.2013 21:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Eurema hecabe.

22.12.2013 16:06, Peter Khramov:

Ugums ready.

22.12.2013 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter really figure it out. Nekuzyavo turns out :)

22.12.2013 14:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea craspedota / Confidently identified / John Moore.

22.12.2013 9:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vladimir Savchuk.

22.12.2013 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vladimir Savchuk.

22.12.2013 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vlad Proklov.

22.12.2013 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vladimir Savchuk.

22.12.2013 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Andrey Ponomarev Vladimir Savchuk.

21.12.2013 23:34, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, ready.

21.12.2013 23:13, Zoran Bozovic:

Emmelina monodactyla ?

21.12.2013 23:11, Zoran Bozovic:

Oxyptilus sp. *

21.12.2013 23:03, Zoran Bozovic:

Pleuroptya ruralis ?

21.12.2013 22:56, Zoran Bozovic:

Pandemis dumetana ? *

21.12.2013 22:56, Zoran Bozovic:

Pandemis dumetana ? *

21.12.2013 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaorhinus viridiluteata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.12.2013 22:47, Zoran Bozovic:

Alcis repandata ?

21.12.2013 22:14, Zoran Bozovic:

Uuuuuuuuuu, You are Car!!!
May be i shall switch from German forum to this one!
Best Regards

21.12.2013 22:08, Zoran Bozovic:

And again, Thank You! *

21.12.2013 22:07, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You Mr. Alexandr!
Which families are You specialist for, please?

21.12.2013 21:59, Zoran Bozovic:

Thank You Aleksandr, much obliged! *

21.12.2013 20:28, Irina Nikulina:

I think the author identified this right, Idaea craspedota http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/08_Sterrhinae/20_Idaea/Idaea%20craspedota/Idaea%20craspedota.htm
http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=43438&spec_id=KHC3225d%201276774484&meta=&image=www.boldsystems.org/pics/KHCGE/KHC3225d+1276774484.jpg

21.12.2013 20:22, Irina Nikulina:

Tanaorhinus viridiluteata, similarly to http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21246

21.12.2013 15:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eucosma balatonana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.12.2013 14:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leptosia nina / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.12.2013 2:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis punctinalis / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.12.2013 1:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

The species is identified by Karola Winzer on lepiforum.de.

21.12.2013 1:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila inquinatella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.12.2013 0:14, Irina Nikulina:

Leptosia nina, probably (L. n. malayana ssp., Fruhstorfer, 1910)?

20.12.2013 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macaria alternata / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.12.2013 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, filled still new. Now we have to remove the old doubles: 3158 and 4834 by assigning them a new number.

20.12.2013 20:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hoplodrina ambigua / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.12.2013 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Blanca Prado Irina Nikulina.

20.12.2013 19:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paramaxates spinivesica / Tentatively identified / Blanca Prado.

20.12.2013 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema simulatrix / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

20.12.2013 8:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Three but a few.

20.12.2013 0:03, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Stunning pic!

19.12.2013 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Male & female Not identified / Imago.

19.12.2013 22:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Male & female Not identified / Imago.

19.12.2013 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Male & female Not identified / Imago.

19.12.2013 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Male & female Not identified / Imago.

19.12.2013 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Male & female Not identified / Imago.

19.12.2013 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tortricidae / Tentatively identified / Male & female / Zoran Bozovic Not identified / Imago.

19.12.2013 22:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please someone order such photos, should be moved to not identified. Can't do it myself working from my phone.

19.12.2013 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Male & female Not identified / Imago.

19.12.2013 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Options? This is most likely, imho.

19.12.2013 19:35, Shamil Murtazin:

A small "bug"
Open http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/3811 (until other such points are not found, but apparently they are).
On the right the panels direct the mouse on the bottom two photos (22875, 22903)
Tooltip appears near the mouse - it shows "Butterfly Photo # 22875 (type undefined)"
On the other fotah in this kind of all right - Ethmia bipunctella.

19.12.2013 18:40, Peter Khramov:

If shipping a lot, then hand one should not do it for the time being, together with the next load update the global database.

19.12.2013 17:59, Irina Nikulina:

Peter again about Gastropacha. Maybe then make not only Gastropacha sikkima Moore, 1879, which today you have written on the page watanabei, but others. Online kinds missing? Above already mentioned here that a lot of them (http://www.ubio.org/browser/search.php?search_all=Gastropacha), and the site is now only 5. There are these types and then http: //www.catalogueoflife. org / col / search / all / items / 100 / key / Gastropacha -
with an indication of the source from which information is taken, mostly LepIndex.

19.12.2013 10:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Can be neither as well. Sure Euploea though.

19.12.2013 5:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fully agree with Irina. Any versions more?

19.12.2013 4:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK. Tomorrow I will do.

18.12.2013 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Basil, for better speed zaley new, and I rename them in the old. Ie in the pages of the old phot will be new files.

18.12.2013 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Periphoba arcaei / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Periphoba arcaei / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The pics should be grouped up. Dmitry, welcome. Things moving towards :)

18.12.2013 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhinopalpa polynice / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lonomia electra / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rhinopalpa polynice

18.12.2013 14:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Periphoba arcaei

18.12.2013 14:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lonomia electra / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lonomia electra.

18.12.2013 14:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Copaxa rufinans / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Copaxa rufinans / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Copaxa rufinans

18.12.2013 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhinopalpa polynice / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Proteides mercurius / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Proteides mercurius / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 14:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rhinopalpa polynice (Cramer, [1779])

18.12.2013 13:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Proteides mercurius (Fabricius, 1787)

18.12.2013 13:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Proteides mercurius (Fabricius, 1787)

18.12.2013 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cissia confusa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 13:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cissia confusa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 13:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good candidate: moving :)

18.12.2013 9:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I like more Cissia confusa (Staudinger, 1887)

18.12.2013 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema proterpia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Memphis moruus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas februa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Temenis laothoe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema proterpia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis sennae / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis agarithe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis agarithe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema proterpia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema proterpia (Fabricius, 1775)

18.12.2013 9:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius charithonia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema proterpia (Fabricius, 1775)

18.12.2013 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Temenis laothoe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas februa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Memphis moruus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.12.2013 9:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis agarithe agarithe (Boisduval, 1836)

18.12.2013 9:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis agarithe agarithe (Boisduval, 1836)

18.12.2013 9:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis sennae marcellina (Cramer, 1777)

18.12.2013 8:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Underside needed

18.12.2013 8:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heliconius charithonia

18.12.2013 8:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Temenis laothoe (Cramer, 1777)

18.12.2013 8:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hamadryas februa ferentina (Godart, [1824])

18.12.2013 8:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Memphis moruus boisduvali (W. Comstock, 1961)

18.12.2013 1:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aethes cnicana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

18.12.2013 0:32, Irina Nikulina:

As I see, this "tough case" might turn out Euploea mulciber male.

17.12.2013 21:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Memphis sp. Further lost...

17.12.2013 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Melanargia halimede / Yuri Semejkin Melanargia epimede / Irina Nikulina.

17.12.2013 21:08, Irina Nikulina:

Again Melanargia epimede, discussion there http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/7670.

17.12.2013 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Consul electra / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.12.2013 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Consul electra / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

17.12.2013 15:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melanargia halimede Melanargia epimede.

17.12.2013 15:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yuri Semejkin Irina Nikulina.

17.12.2013 14:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Ira! Didn't check out the links you gave, I checked and compared their descriptions. You're right again, this is Melanargia epinede. As for #7671 pic, I think the same is there. Grounds: 1. You can see part of the topside and this is specific color of Melanargia epinede whilst Melanargia halimede is way lighter; 2. If we rely on the collection specimen (underside) of Melanargia halimede, Vasily's photo, discal band is clearly seen and specific for this species. My pic has similar one, little bit though.

17.12.2013 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, there was a proposal on these two of my ph: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3158 and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4834 - they need to make clickable. Butterfly is easily confused with similar, Far View M. epimede and increased help to clarify the situation. Either he shift, and then you udalish duplicates, or you do something with the existing (in these photos wholly M. halimede).As people look at this?

17.12.2013 0:45, Peter Khramov:

Whoa.

17.12.2013 0:44, Peter Khramov:

I'll pop by, Dmitry ;--)

17.12.2013 0:24, Irina Nikulina:

Yury, today I spreaded epimede of my reserves and a fresh September halimede and saw this photo. Serious doubt this is halimede. Check these http://catocala.narod.ru/sat51.html http://catocala.narod.ru/sat12a.html и http://rusinsects.com/satyrid/s-me-epi.htm http://rusinsects.com/satyrid/s-me-hal.htm. Both websites show distinctions between these two species. Look at the dark pattern on the wing topside and the underside pattern (7671 pic is also questionable).

16.12.2013 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

???Cissia terrestris (A. Butler, 1867)???

16.12.2013 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cissia sp. To dig out...

16.12.2013 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mixochlora vittata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.12.2013 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Arichanna melanaria / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.12.2013 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing more similar in my mind... Move to uncertain till then: time to sort it out.

16.12.2013 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

16.12.2013 11:12, Shamil Murtazin:

Could help out with camera, sadly live far in the Urals )
Love littles :D

16.12.2013 9:26, Svetlana Shchavelina:

To slightly frighten people, I highly recommend (if you're on the coast) to try here is a horseshoe crab roe salad with vegetables and nuts. Very tasty, I recommend.

16.12.2013 9:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I could add two hundred more species, personally. Not good with camera though. Lots of littles.

16.12.2013 8:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

All quite edible in the photo. Kanchil and fazany- all restaurant meals. With Agama, of course, difficult for us, but the taste they are normal.

16.12.2013 3:15, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, turns out vittata, naturally). I finally could compare properly these two species http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=41437
http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=69179. These links show good those distinctions described in that Diagnosis: "species are very similar, but M. argentifusa Walker has the antemedial and postmedial more strongly convergent towards the dorsum, and the silvery submarginal of the forewing is irregular in vittata but forms an obtuse angle in argentifusa". The last distinction is especially visible. (whilst there is chaos in the species names in pics found on the web).

16.12.2013 1:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Didn' get it :) Here, http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/gallery.php, photos only whilst changing place in species. Where is right and where is not? vittata is mentioned in Thailand on http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=175897

16.12.2013 1:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerace xanthocosma / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.12.2013 1:09, Irina Nikulina:

Sorry, the right link http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_14_1.php. Diagnosis provided with the vittata description.

16.12.2013 1:04, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, I doubted seriously which one is right... The species look very similar indeed. The location won, examining lots of pics and Diagnosis given in the argentifusa description, there http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_14_2.php.

16.12.2013 0:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why not Mixochlora vittata?

16.12.2013 0:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eucyclodes albisparsa / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

16.12.2013 0:41, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably Mixochlora argentifusa
http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=92188
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/14_Mixochlora/Mixochlora%20argentifusa/Mixochlora%20argentifusa.htm

16.12.2013 0:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Erebus crepuscularis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

15.12.2013 23:50, Anna Gerasimova:

Maybe http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/841-Neptis/Neptis-sankara ?

15.12.2013 23:50, Irina Nikulina:

Eucyclodes albisparsa (Walker, 1861), male
http://www.lepbarcoding.org/geometridae/species.php?region=1&id=41576
http://www.flickr.com/photos/botalex/5698086448/in/set-72157607538370690

15.12.2013 23:09, Anna Gerasimova:

I would like to find an electronic form)))

15.12.2013 22:32, Anna Gerasimova:

Thank you, Mr. I look for.

14.12.2013 18:29, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Basil, the man - omnivorous. And the meat eaten in this region (judging by Thailand and Laos) - a little. It is understandable, it's hot out there ... And, I admit, not all particularly fastidious in relation to food. I've slightly squeamish, in any case - within reasonable limits. But there are others, so it is better to know than not to know.And then - is your choice, the opposite may want exotic food in feelings? Now I find that in Laos food is ... Ah, here:

14.12.2013 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A sobachatiny: she lamb straight ..... once in the Trans-Baikal region (served there) were treated. As long as you do not know who em - no retching :)

14.12.2013 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They seem to be unaware in China that hawkmoths shouldn't be laid on the card wings folded like butterflies: abdomen gets flattened on sides, no chance to get it spread back properly. Woe-catchers...... Got such specimens in my collection, sadly, grumpy then :)

14.12.2013 15:01, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, indeed, have recently been transferred from the photo Basil transiens in sundana, but illustrations to mind transiens foto..Pёtr left one, this is where you need to improve http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/75251

14.12.2013 13:31, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Sarbanissa sundana and Sarbanissa transiens - the same picture on the pages of description of these butterflies.

14.12.2013 13:15, Peter Khramov:

Next should be 10,000, clever ;--)

14.12.2013 11:37, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Dmitri, the taste and color - it is clear ... But personally, I do not know what the reaction will happen to my stomach if I find that ate sobachatiny. In Laos, our driver (local) ate crickets, the desire to try not appeared for some reason ... although the possibility was. On catching butterflies, of course, all this has no effect, but people should know some of the nuances.My friend secretly described this moment precisely because it knows that especially need to know the Europeans, because she is married to Germans, PhD in ichthyology (I correctly wrote? ... Well, in short - a scholar of the fish).

In the picture: a dish of spiders (Cambodia)

14.12.2013 11:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Won't get 5,000 till the end of the year, gonna do our best in the next. :)

14.12.2013 5:54, Peter Khramov:

Well yeah! Could be new from China!) Anyway, 4,000 is better than 3,000 :--)

14.12.2013 2:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

You're welcome :) Pity no new species for the website. Didn't notice we reached 4,000 more species. :)

14.12.2013 1:47, Peter Khramov:

More!

14.12.2013 1:47, Peter Khramov:

Thanks again!

14.12.2013 1:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cechenena lineosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.12.2013 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clanis undulosa / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.12.2013 0:55, Peter Khramov:

Thanks!

14.12.2013 0:44, Irina Nikulina:

Well great) I listed through the gender too, third time for the past two weeks) after recent sundana and transiens learnt by heart all Sarbanissa)).

14.12.2013 0:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Daphnis hypothous / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.12.2013 0:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sarbanissa catacoloides Sarbanissa longipennis.

14.12.2013 0:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, thanks, my fault, totally agree with this decision, I checked the whole gender, not one I suggested. This pic can be found on the web as well.

13.12.2013 23:38, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, didn't get it clear... I identified it as S.longipennis (could be wrong, still thinking this). If it's catacoloides as you see it, then the name of the identifier should be corrected).

13.12.2013 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa catacoloides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.12.2013 21:46, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably this is Paramaxates spinivesica Holloway, 1996, http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/17_Paramaxates/Paramaxates%20spinivesica/Paramaxates%20spinivesica.htm. Not sure totally as there is another species looking very similar which is absent on this website, neither on funet.fi, Paramaxates taiwana Yazaki, 1988
http://taibif.tw/zh/catalogue_of_life/page/f1e1-2f4b-0b98-83c8-f1d3-c108-a21f-ab68-namecode-345145
http://digileps.biology.nsysu.edu.tw/digilep_alpha/public/zh/specimen.php?synonymID=1538

13.12.2013 20:51, Irina Nikulina:

I think this is Sarbanissa longipennis
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/05_NOCTUIDAE/08_AGARISTINAE/07_Sarbanissa/Sarbanissa%20longipennis/Sarbanissa%20longipennis.htm

13.12.2013 20:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Glyphodes onychinalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

13.12.2013 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saroba maculicosta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

13.12.2013 14:30, Shamil Murtazin:

Any suggestions why it has so tall "antennae"? =)

13.12.2013 12:11, Irina Nikulina:

Very likely Glyphodes onychinalis

13.12.2013 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I, too, for the automation of the groups regarding the proposed Shamil. If possible, it would be a good idea to implement.

13.12.2013 9:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Anna Gerasimova! Book Recommendations Moths of Nepal, Toshirō Haruta is Nepal
According to India's Taxonomy of Moths in India. Ajai Srivastava

13.12.2013 9:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By the way, Olga Averyanov lived or still live in Sihanoukville. Write to her, she will tell a lot.

13.12.2013 9:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dogs delicious. The Chinese and Koreans eat them too. Seoul has a restaurant serving dishes from all sobachatiny. Insect eating (lots of fried tarantulas sold). In Thailand also eat insects (seen fried grasshoppers, scorpions and water bugs belastom). Especially in poorer provinces such as Insan. In South America, iguanas eat. In Vietnam, the frogs.In my eating habits and knowledge of English natives do not affect the catch Lepidoptera. Your friend says is subjective. She lives close to Cambodia, but maybe in Cambodia and was not.As far as I understand it, Taya and Cambodia relations are tense due to constant conflicts temple, so the population dissenting opinion about the neighbors. I was in Tae three times from Chiang Mai to Surat Thani, but I liked Cambodia. But the taste and color of all the markers are different. In Thai, and if go, then just to the north.But be sure to come back to Cambodia someday.

12.12.2013 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.12.2013 23:47, Irina Nikulina:

Ypthima argus

12.12.2013 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Alexandr Zhakov.

12.12.2013 22:46, Shamil Murtazin:

The species identified by Alexandr Zhakov

12.12.2013 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is clear fault :)

12.12.2013 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, you can try to do. Tokma mistakes here we still are in groups where one group of people in a completely different foty puts ...

12.12.2013 19:20, Peter Khramov:

I learn these sweet English-speaking momentum. Similarly, Yugoslavia inglishe glagolyut ...

12.12.2013 19:18, Peter Khramov:

I unsubscribe to the e-mail.

12.12.2013 19:18, Peter Khramov:

Fine, but it's not togdamest this topic; -) ... Read the above carefully

12.12.2013 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I will take with it the Old required from time to time. And yet there is something delicious in Egypt and the Middle East :)

12.12.2013 18:33, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you are now and you will be added prosharivat entire book or just added? -)

12.12.2013 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, yesterday I added to the list of David Carter "Butterflies and Moths". Dorling Kindersley Limited, 9 Henrietta Street, London, 1992.
Dr. David Carter is quite a well-known entomologist and its data can be trusted.

12.12.2013 13:27, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Lord, I've been asked about a Thai friend of Cambodia ... because I think that people who live close to this country, they know some of the nuances in some way better than we do ... that's what she told me (quote):
"For go to Cambodia for catch butterflies ... not bad ... still ok ... but do not go alone

because only in town can speak good English .. and .. Becareful ... this nation eat "dog"

ask for make sure before eat something ... they eat many insect too "

12.12.2013 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Media Player Classic is the best player in my opinion. And now I recommend to drive the most recent DivX. Take here: http://www.divx.com/ Then probably brake "sink into oblivion," so as the K-Lite has its own DivX, which is usually out of date and has the ability to "interrupt" previously installed in the system is very bad in the He overlapping ..

12.12.2013 10:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! that the proposal is not about mail to the lamp and the trap. He promised on Monday.

12.12.2013 10:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Will not. Let the people are not relaxing.

12.12.2013 1:48, Peter Khramov:

MPC try new K-Lite, like works is, at times, too podglyuchivaet ...

12.12.2013 0:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

PS Actually a screen like swear me an email Skins.

11.12.2013 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

DivX try update. And try Ace Mega codeks pack or K lite. Probably codecs disorder. Later poprbuem poreshat (currently working).

11.12.2013 23:18, Peter Khramov:

On level ground (or on a level, but for me inconspicuous) stopped playing kina. KMPleer or freezes when loading a file, an error or an error in some library (in some - not to mention). Reinstallation and reinstall other EVOH version - does not help. Other players, including normal Vindovs Media behave about the same.Who-thread faced it? What kind of garbage?

11.12.2013 16:21, Sergey Titov:

I might have hurried with identifying, but it's huge in size and there were roughly hundred such hawkmoths.

11.12.2013 16:09, Peter Khramov:

Dim, well, you add all the same, what is the sum of the population of Cuba considers the money: -) And then scare away some people.

11.12.2013 9:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

11.12.2013 8:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In Cuba, the national population plays to tear money from tourists.

11.12.2013 7:49, Shamil Murtazin:

Just thought it was worth checking to introduce new attributes introduced old. And if they do not match - it displays an error indicating no matched attribute. And you can click "Install anyway".
Optional ...

11.12.2013 7:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Watching another opportunity to improve "working conditions" moderators.
It is - to add functionality: define a single photo of the group - the whole group gets the same attributes.
This will reduce the number of clicks for the "change", as well as reduce the likelihood of errors in affix attributes.Especially when one group of pictures, for various reasons given different attributes (e.g., name determine the accuracy of determination, etc.)

11.12.2013 7:36, Shamil Murtazin:

Yet feels like to uncertain, maybe...

11.12.2013 5:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I added info about the species, referenced: this is very wide-spread (anywhere but America). Also accorded to some other data, butterfly mentioned in Ukraine, the Crimea (didn't add that though).
The pupae origin is hard to guess, they rather were brought from Southwest Asia to Moscow (common thing, they come for further sale) :)

11.12.2013 2:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia subfusca / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

11.12.2013 2:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia subfusca / Tentatively identified / Vlad Proklov.

11.12.2013 2:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia subfusca / Tentatively identified / Vlad Proklov.

11.12.2013 1:44, Irina Nikulina:

Folks please don't be scared!) Dmitry, you're right! Usually I always mention home-raised. And tell where pupae are from. This time chrysippus wasn't presented to me personally, but moved to me for nurture) I was going to elaborate and forgot) Can't even say where the pupae are from, couldn't help but shoot such a beauty.

10.12.2013 23:44, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Maybe worth adding that it's home-raised, not naturally? Not to scare folks ;)

10.12.2013 23:16, Anna Gerasimova:

Thank you for your hospitality! and a tip to "first aid kit" special thanks!
I will ship to the extent possible)))

10.12.2013 23:07, Anna Gerasimova:

I often use this site: http://www.ifoundbutterflies.org/
By location it suits me)
But there is absolutely no moths.

10.12.2013 22:35, Shamil Murtazin:

kotbegemot from molbiol.ru identified it as the Scoparia gender...
subfusca species... However, it's absent in the Urals accorded to Synev's catalogue...

10.12.2013 22:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Anna, welcome! .. Itself also here recently. Location you selected great =)
Maybe you are already familiar with this forum, but would recommend it to "speed up" identification of butterflies: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596

10.12.2013 22:01, Peter Khramov:

Anna, if the definition is quickly and accurately, you must first define and then upload to the site-specific species. If not quick and inaccurate - it is better to foty without defining than any. Especially from such exotic places. There is a view to the determination of the species. If the definition is to a higher taxon, can be safely shipped immediately, without waiting.And, of course, welcome and thanks for foty.

10.12.2013 21:56, Peter Khramov:

"Kind of, images of which is not in the network, should be welcomed on the site in any way and gently recommend to correct the mistakes."
So all right. I just welcome, nothing is removed and gently recommend -)
"As for the rulers, many very good sites, it is required to present"
The fact of the matter is that good general sites for butterflies there.Hopefully in the future we will be so.
ZY Perhaps there are good sites, I just did not see them. But it's very unlikely.

Prelude:
We are accustomed to working with books. And not peretroimsya to book thinking to approach the book with an electric niformatsiey, freer approach.Hence, there is a kindergarten in the form of tickers, implanted into image files, backgrounds in the box, the wishes of links in the directory A, B, C, D, and so forth alphabetically, and "to be able to click on bukovku and view all types that begin with bukovku the "controversy about what to put foty as major - living or dried butterflies,hanging ph several dried specimens together, etc.

It. Sometimes. Conveniently. In books. Because. That there. Strong. Technology. Limitation. And in another. Nothing.

Actually:
1. Why college ruled? Show razamery species? The dimensions of the form - the characteristics of species, not foty.Dimensions particular instance? If they are common - that is characteristic of the species. If unusual, and I want to stress this - write a note or comment to fote "interesting instance of unusually large (small) sizes." and enter the specific size of . It will be much easier to see the people than college ruled.In the future, when fucking wish, you can bring all foty unusual size for a single property so that they could look for.
2. Why the alphabet? To you brought 15,000 species, beginning with your favorite letter? Autosubstitution rabtayut in mulon times faster and more convenient.
3.Why choose only dried or just live? We stamped the corresponding property in the photographs. Do you want to see one thing as the primary? Or maybe you do not allow religion to look at dried? Well, on the site should be relevant to the jackdaw LC. Nope daw? Kick admin to do.
4.Why figachit several dried specimens on one fote? To be able to compare and see at a glance just one fote? So kick the administrator that he made a feature to display arbitrary ph together and comparing them to compare species or on formal grounds, it will be much more convenient and universally applicable approach.Summary:
In the book, we take the page with text and pictures. And scroll.
On the site we take pieces of text, graphic, and (if necessary) vsyaechkoy other information throwing ourselves in any (convenient for a particular situation) form and work with them.So the program can ensure this is the most arbitrary spreading of information on the site should be as laid out on shelves, and then the program to the requirements of the user with the most of these shelves will collect it.
Private picture butterfly - piece. The size of the form - a piece. The size of the particular outstanding instance - piece.Species name - a piece. From pieces to collect the constructor every time something new, right.
The image of two butterflies with a ruler - do not bite. More precisely, a piece, but only one, and not structured enough.

10.12.2013 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gynautocera papilionaria.

10.12.2013 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Gynautocera papilionaria.

10.12.2013 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Accorded to http://www.nhm.ac.uk Gynautocera papilionaria Guérin-Meneville, 1831 is actual. Added the species and the gender then. Moving :)

10.12.2013 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sinarella albeola / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.12.2013 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Comibaena attenuata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

10.12.2013 16:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

10.12.2013 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, to be honest, did not quite understand what you mean.but probably it is not important, you do not like that two butterflies in the photo? probably yes, it is not good, as I understood the main thing here in a search engine that can go crazy with a large number of options, but again, as I understood it all depends on you, you can put a search on "Options", but probably do not need. Sergei honestly put the "imago".The view image which there is no network , should be welcomed on the site in any way and gently recommend to correct mistakes. About rulers, many very good sites, it is necessarily present, or it does not focus.In my opinion it is particularly important in electronic resources, when the image can be any size and specify the size in the comments of this book. :). Perhaps it's necessary to move somewhere to discuss the photos :)

10.12.2013 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hello, Anna. Certainly for the site is very useful any photos of butterflies in all stages of development, including uncertain species (such try to determine jointly). Links to determine the butterflies there are in a particular topic: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/2328 (so as jointly try to fill it). Join now.We always welcome new participant. Welcome to the site!

10.12.2013 12:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! Regarding Gastropacha watanabei Okano, 1966 Yes, it is in the Far East. There's a bit of information in the collection of Insect Systematics Far East, Vladivostok, 1984 article: lasiocampidae kind Gastropacha Ochs, (Lepidoptera, Lasiocampidae) Far East
View appeared new to the fauna of the USSR

10.12.2013 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2010-07-17 15:50:00.

10.12.2013 12:10, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably it's Comibaena attenuata
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/26_Comibaena/Comibaena%20attenuata/Comibaena%20attenuata.htm
http://boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=92180

10.12.2013 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

10.12.2013 11:34, Anna Gerasimova:

I am newbie. I thought that would be, to say to all, "Hello."
It so happens that I live in Southeast Asia (India, Nepal). Butterflies here very much, began to take pictures, and then determine on Internet resources and now I can not stop)))
I hope my photos will be useful websites, as many butterflies have no photo yet.While I am trying to upload photos of butterflies, which have already been identified. But there are many nameless, especially the night. On the night until I found a good site-determinant.
How better to download to your court all anonymous, or to try to identify the very least the family? Advise, please, if you know where it is convenient to determine the moths Southeast Asia?

10.12.2013 11:30, Peter Khramov:

First, nowhere it is written that it is male and female. And just spelled Imago. Secondly, the worst has to select ph on the grounds of (male / nesamets). Thirdly, the indication of the size should be in the form of text in the note to a picture (i.e. just in the label) and not embedded in a line in the image.The books can not be so free to handle nifoy (there generally can not be - printed and truncated), and on the site - it is possible. The information must be in a convenient form for handling, and not in the book (though sometimes it may be the same) ...

10.12.2013 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, do not delete, you go ahead of the engine is very good, just unusual. For me there is not something wrong, that the male and female in one picture, if desired, but it can be divided in the future.As for the rulers, Peter I completely disagree, his site is not studio, and a powerful database with 4 thousand species over time, proceed to the fact that all items will be straightened with rulers. From the part of kidding, but an indication of the size, it is also that of a label, be sure to label and line trash, unfair and wrong.

10.12.2013 10:31, Sergey Titov:

Remove, debris will not

10.12.2013 1:45, Peter Khramov:

Yes, no problem, there is a glass.

09.12.2013 21:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Got other angles.

09.12.2013 13:59, Alex Dumchus:

Clearly, spasibo.dumayu jungle I find.
Now to decide otelem.A that in Cuba, the problems with catching?

09.12.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.12.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.12.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.12.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

09.12.2013 11:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Thanks, but...
"640K should be enough for everyone ..."

09.12.2013 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Aleksandr Andrianov Hyles gallii / Fyodor Pudovikov.

09.12.2013 10:19, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Hyles gallii

09.12.2013 10:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Plus need slides and cover glass for microscope

09.12.2013 9:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Waiting lamp and frame traps. The terms "test" 10-21 February, Malaysia, Sabah, Kota Kinabalu Park nat. Such quadrangular we took an expedition to Kazakhstan. Very handy thing.

09.12.2013 9:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why reinvent the wheel. DRL best remedy. If you feel sorry for the eye and shell-DRV

09.12.2013 9:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Aleksanlr! I was not Suanukvile, I can not tell. I was in Siem Reap (where Angkor Wat). Tour operators, I did not use. He was first in Thailand and then decided to go to Cambodia. From the South of Pattaya Big C is a bus to the border (300 baht). In Aranyaprattete (Thailand) go abroad (visa 20 dollars), and find yourself in the town of Poipet (Cambodia).There's a bus or a taxi (about $ 20 per car and 4 hours drive) went to Siem Reap. There's always the country impassable jungle. Guesthouse for two $ 30 for 4 days with breakfast and kondeem. From there you can go to Suanukvil sea bus (12 bucks in my opinion). But I saw Angkor Wat and others. Temples, plus caught.Rouge on the drum, when my catch, but after I try Cuba to me with a net not seen. In general there were no incidents. I regret that I have not bought a generator and sexually night.

09.12.2013 0:23, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Castalius rosimon (Fabricius, 1775) ?

08.12.2013 22:04, Anna Gerasimova: This species is identified correctly.

08.12.2013 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Ilia Ustiantcev.

08.12.2013 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipyra pyramidea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

08.12.2013 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.12.2013 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.12.2013 10:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Collection specimen of the Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

08.12.2013 10:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Collection specimen of the Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

08.12.2013 0:01, Peter Khramov:

Similarly to another pic of this specimen.

08.12.2013 0:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Triodia sylvina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.12.2013 0:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Triodia sylvina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.12.2013 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Most likely, it's just a tunnel. But with light at the end.

07.12.2013 23:25, Shamil Murtazin:

As a tourist, I can say that the hooks cooler loops, drawstrings or tissue "tunnels";)
We are waiting for specifications and prototypes ...

07.12.2013 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will move it tomorrow (now can't). Triodia sylvina imho.

07.12.2013 23:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Right below looks like Trombidium Holosericeum =)

07.12.2013 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Yes, P. Gorbunov Yu, Olshvang VN Butterflies Southern Urals. Directory determinant. Yekaterinburg: Socrates, 2008. [86] is also in the process.

07.12.2013 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Exactly. This looks like, but our Lucci; -)

07.12.2013 20:59, Shamil Murtazin:


Then, since)

07.12.2013 20:58, Shamil Murtazin:

It seems necessary to collect the interferometer and scientific work carried out)))
To XRD spectrum like to do =)

07.12.2013 18:33, Peter Khramov:

I suggest this topic to publish announcements / reports from some source who plans to publish the Old website or already published. We mean not fragmentary data for certain types and is more or less a full pass on the source, after which once again take on it is not necessary (ie, added infa for all or the majority of species).We need these announcements / reports in order to not get double the work because of the fact that a couple of people around the same time decided to prosherstit same source.Note 1: again - we write here only about the global webs, if you add 3 kinds of books, which describes the 150 butterfly - it is good and right, but in this topic infu this is not a treasure, because it is necessary once again take place on the remaining species infu collect. But if on the contrary, of the 150 collected at all but 3 - if yes, then we publish.Note 2: There is nothing wrong if you want to add the Old from the source, and someone has already proanonsiroval, which also plans to do it. Sleeping with them in this thread or via e-mail and divide power between them on the part of any contract, who nevertheless they will engage fully.Accordingly, let's backs to possible to the texts, and the solid obtained gallery ...
To begin:
Now the data is loaded from the Jizera VV Bombikoidnye lepidoptera (Sem. Bombycidae, Endromididae, Lasiocampidae, Brachmaeidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae) and Corydalis (Sem. Notodontidae) Siberia and the Far East. Kiev: Gnosis, 1999.[122] (except for a few misunderstood species), the remake of the old sources and removal of the section "The old description» - Rayhholf Rim H. Butterflies. M .: Astrel, 2002. [5] and Mouha J. Butterfly. Prague: Artiya, 1979. [12] .
ZY When specifying sources offer copy-paste them from the list of references in the same section of the site, distinguished from other text in italics.

07.12.2013 18:23, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is similar to the Czech gizmo, but not this one, and the other, a more accurate model of (different shape and size of the petals, as well as a full frame). Weight is expected to slightly more than a kilogram together with the frame, but without lamp / electrics.

07.12.2013 18:16, Alex Dumchus:

I tried black ufiolet. lamp. I put three 45 cm long home for the night in the gazebo. When switched off, the rest of the world it is something flies, but not enough. by combining them with plain white or uf.beloy fly a little better. But the city is not an indicator of external illumination-light district.

07.12.2013 17:32, Shamil Murtazin:

It seems that the principle is roughly the

I also wonder how much will weigh.

07.12.2013 17:29, Shamil Murtazin:

So, the next question on the world.
Somebody tried energosberegayki ultraviolet lamp with a black?

Just make out one - it's easy to convert to 12 volts.

07.12.2013 16:58, Irina Nikulina:

Peter here http://www.de-zimmer.de/eGuide/Lep2.1-MO.htm - Odontosia (ex Carmelita, Leucodonta) sieversii Ménétriès, 1856, syn arnoldiana Kardakoff, 1928. In November, I wrote here about Odontosia - This site Siberian Zool. Museum http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lepidop/Notodon.htm. It's nothing for Odontosia arnoldiana not clarify?

07.12.2013 16:51, Alex Dumchus:

A size - folded and unfolded?

07.12.2013 16:40, Peter Khramov:

As will be ready foty - lay. In general, the idea is that the frame is placed chetyrehlepestkovy white screen in the center of which hangs a lamp (ideally - mercury). As a result, animals are flying from all sides and comfortably sit down at one time or another tab or on the bottom of the screen (it is also available).When this structure is not only effective for catching and shooting nasekomyshey, but also easy to transport (folded into a compact bag), as well as to carry into an unfolded state.
Well, of course, do not need any trees and other clues to mount - placed at least in the open field, as long as the wind is not blown away: -)

07.12.2013 16:33, Irina Nikulina:

Yury, thanks, this scheme is on molbiol, I used that earlier, and distinctions seen even more clearly there http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Amphipyra_Pyramidea. Yet some doubts... maybe due to this noctuid is not brand-new) Wait for expert opinion.

07.12.2013 15:55, Yuri Semejkin:

There is closeup http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=4810&size=big&cat=6516. Both species shown in one pic.

07.12.2013 15:50, Alex Dumchus:

"Frame traps for night catching insects on the light," Peter - is it? and a light source is used?

07.12.2013 15:48, Peter Khramov:

So, ostayuetsya Gastropacha watanaebi and Odontosia arnoldiana. Mentioned in the source Jizera VV Bombikoidnye lepidoptera (Sem. Bombycidae, Endromididae, Lasiocampidae, Brachmaeidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae) and Corydalis (Sem. Notodontidae) Siberia and the Far East. Kiev: Gnosis, 1999. [122]

07.12.2013 15:21, Peter Khramov:

This topic will post any nyamka for juzverej Lepidoptera from entomagaza lepstor. Nyamka may differ just zaregalsya users and authors (ie, users publish their materials, defining types, etc.) Sometimes spetsusloviya will coincide with options for molbiola, sometimes - not.To nyamka was your - are building order Lepstore , be sure to go there in the account using their data from modeling and assigning a note to the order , they say, need to nyamka juzverej Lepidoptera.
So:
- Loop entomological box 25x35 : Free for review.- Tubes for storage of the genitals and other parts of the insect (made in Holland, the site has not yet posted): 100 pcs. free for your feedback.
- Dies Lepstor : 3 packs of any size 100 pcs. or assorted 1 pack of 400 pcs. free for your feedback.
"Free" means that you pay only shipping and goods cost for you is zero.For driving off to distant lands:
In January, maybe in December, will be available for bags Lepstor nets (also free of charge for review), as well as frame for night fishing traps insects to light (these are not free, but sooo substantial discount, too, for a review).
If anyone has any questions - write / call to this topic or mail / phone.From time to time I will be subject to update.

07.12.2013 14:20, Irina Nikulina:

Amphipyra berbera? (or still pyramidea, doubts)

07.12.2013 13:47, Alex Dumchus:

Shamil, as I always do. But if you can !!! ask the person to orient to catch butterflies !!! - Then why not? Sam, if someone has to, I can answer questions about the butterflies on the islands Taya, South Viet-Meksikanam Dominican Republic, not to mention Turkey, Emirates, Ebiptu where there are practically no ..

07.12.2013 13:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, I think, have the opportunity to torment tour operators to provide such information, or even addresses. Then they look at guglokartah (or somewhere else) alone. With this "intelligence" will exhaust (I think). Yes, and navigate the terrain better.That certainly does not diminish the usefulness of the information from Dmitri, if he has time to answer before your departure =)

07.12.2013 13:22, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cucullia chamomillae / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

07.12.2013 13:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea aurelia Melitaea britomartis.

07.12.2013 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea aurelia Melitaea britomartis.

07.12.2013 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea aurelia Melitaea britomartis.

07.12.2013 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea aurelia Melitaea britomartis.

07.12.2013 13:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Melitaea aurelia Melitaea britomartis.

07.12.2013 12:59, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Last night friends flew from Bangkok, inquired about the riots, I was told: "Do not read Soviet newspapers." Everything was there - it's in front of the Government House, the rest live in the capital normally.

07.12.2013 11:50, Andrey Ponomarev:

This and other photos of this Melitaea britomartis specimen identified by Thomas Netter on lepiforum.de

07.12.2013 8:55, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitry, au..otzovites. Soon tours to take. And you promised to tell about Cambodia. bBolshe all I'm interested in the proximity of the jungle to the hotels in Sihanouk .. and how to get to the place you specify how far from the beach and hotel beds?

07.12.2013 1:00, Irina Nikulina:

Oops..... doubled somehow( like more persuasive)

07.12.2013 0:57, Irina Nikulina:

As for distribution, there is such thing that China is mentioned on funet.fi whilst jpmoth.org says locally Hubei. Though other websites and Y.P. Korshunov mention China, and Hubei is not far from Sichuan, so location seems ok. Vasily, I'd check just in case also Aporia potanini http://eol.org/pages/170999/overview and Aporia intercostata http://globis.insects-online.de/species&s=5654 (and some sources mention the latter as Aporia potanini ssp.). As for distribution, there is such thing that China is mentioned on funet.fi whilst jpmoth.org says locally Hubei. Though other websites and Y.P. Korshunov mention China, and Hubei is not far from Sichuan, so location seems ok. Vasily, I'd check just in case also Aporia potanini http://eol.org/pages/170999/overview and Aporia intercostata http://globis.insects-online.de/species&s=5654 (and some sources mention the latter as Aporia potanini ssp.).

06.12.2013 21:54, Irina Nikulina:

Only location... Should be checked!

06.12.2013 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, underside would be good here.

06.12.2013 21:20, Irina Nikulina:

Folks voice) Vasily, this is it. I saw it not once in nature, this red spot on its underside is very specific. And the very underside is white whilst bieti's hindwings are whole yellowish.

06.12.2013 20:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It seems to me Aporia hippia (Bremer, 1861) : http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Butterflies%20of%20China/03_Pieridae/framepage%20Pieridae.html
What you guys think?

06.12.2013 18:19, Alex Dumchus:

In Tae I caught on paths and clearings through the jungle. It receives much more than near the brook. I do not know why, but some sand from sinking handles very little. Only Belyanko and a little bit parusniki- Graphiumy. Eploei, setozii, Juno, Memnon and other troidesy not sit ever, only flowers or catching a fly.

06.12.2013 18:04, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Alexander, for your purposes need not just a jungle, and some stream / river in the forest, and even better - a small waterfall with a more or less convenient approach. In such places butterflies arrive to drink ... That's basically everywhere they fly, but in places like ... More perespevshie chew fruits fallen from the trees ...

06.12.2013 16:23, Peter Khramov:

I create a separate subject and comments to stand foty 25438.

06.12.2013 16:19, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. How are Cambodians to catching butterflies? Rest we will beach, whether there is a jungle near the beaches? To be able to pass peshochkom -pair times a day?

06.12.2013 16:11, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you, Mr. In Sri go like some other time. Ordered tour operators - see Cambodia, something close to the sea - Sihanoukville? And where you catch how far from this place?

06.12.2013 9:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Here is a photo KBAL Spean. I was there and caught. How to explain popast-. http://www.justin-klein.com/exploring-angkor-river-of-a-thousand-lingas/

06.12.2013 9:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

From your options, I would recommend Cambodia (of Taya get cheap can be from Bangkok and Pattaya). I traveled from Pattaya to Siem Reap. I recommend catching on to Kbal Spean. During the afternoon session 46 species.

06.12.2013 9:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I am in Sri Lanka over the sea five days stuck in Maravilla. Delias eucharis and P. hector complete. Then I take a taxi for 5 days and traveled all dostopritelnosti (merit, in my opinion, only Sigiriya). Then again, he is resting on the sea.

06.12.2013 9:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Malaysia Borneo flying on 7 February. There is nothing terrible in Cambodia did not notice. All very friendly, unlike the artful Thais spoiled But the crappy tourist contingent in Sri Lanka.

06.12.2013 9:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Polimnestora caught in India. Reserve Bondla, Goa. Need Sachek with very long handle. It flies high.
Vietnam should go to the Chinese border -laosskoy. South Vetnama- desert.
Cambodia is the best option. Around the forest and great temples. You can combine business with pleasure. Everything is very cheap.
Sri Lanka's main aim was Ypthima ceylonica Hewitson, 1864.What specific types are you interested in?

05.12.2013 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved as totally agree with Irina, see no other variants.

05.12.2013 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis andetria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.12.2013 20:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.12.2013 20:31, Alex Dumchus:

rhipheus female.

05.12.2013 19:33, Svetlana Shchavelina:

And, no, I'm in central or northern Vietnam plan. A friend of mine from Hanoi.

05.12.2013 18:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, thanks to the moths have to keep an eye :)

05.12.2013 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, all right: a male Angerona prunaria is.

05.12.2013 18:29, Alex Dumchus:

And where in southern Viet forest? We drove 250 km in one direction, all shaved, just like in Spain, then traveled to Dalat (there on the mountains have little forests). But Lepidoptera always tight. But in the northern well, but I did not go Rider ...

05.12.2013 18:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, Peter probably drank it.
Direct link http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/9255/123435528.25/0_c951d_1a9c739f_-1-XL.jpg

05.12.2013 18:06, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Oh, no, Alexander, in Cambodia, I never set foot ... Because I go to Thai Thai to their friends (no tours!), And they like the locals quite trust. So here they are in talks about Cambodia chilly shrugs. So it is better "perebdet": healthier you will be.

Laos and Vietnam - yes, of course it is less developed than Thailand, this is understandable.You just have to keep this in mind. However, may appreciably in the near future in Vietnam: one new acquaintance invited the Vietnamese biologist climb through the woods to look for new varieties of Hoi An.

05.12.2013 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

05.12.2013 17:59, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. Actually Sri interested me because P.polymnestor and some other endemics. If no trouble, answer, whom they cheshuekr .. you met there.

05.12.2013 17:51, Alex Dumchus:

Svetlana. In Tae I have been several times, all on different islands (actually my favorite country!), I was not only on the Krabi, ever going to fly. in contrast to Moscow from Rostov flight arrives in Bangkok, and then taken to the city in a hotel (usually choose adjacent to the main street - it seems Suhumburi or something like that.Bangkok, at least in the center. part, I know better than growth. Because the distance, traffic jams are great. As for Vietnam, it was in April this year, Fantete is close to Mui Ne. Country cool, nice people (but less than in Tae) .Babochek there is even less than we do in the summer. Two weeks stay caught a couple of Danaides and several whiteflies. All ..A Tae except Phuket, Samui and KoChange one exit in the jungle lovilos 10-15 copies, many dispensed due to substandard type. What Cambodia ??? Praise Sihanoukville ...

05.12.2013 17:42, Peter Khramov:

Facebook is the author and without login to the system all seems.

05.12.2013 17:34, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Alexander, at Bangkok International Airport is actually quite far from the city. I think really the end of January it will resolve the whole situation.
Malaysia - fun, but there is humidity year-round in the forest and land leeches, as the locals say, a million ... Brrrr ...
Cambodia - the same "God bless." You never know who that will climb to the head ...Suddenly they do not like your appearance ... Danger. If you need it in this region - so it's better to southern Vietnam, the nature of the same, and to the Russian are normal.

05.12.2013 17:19, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitry, something I got sick in Sri. Already wife persuaded. going to the hotel Bentota is south of Colombo 100-150 kilometers. In both without a net, and that there is generally done? Sknorklinga diving and there is the definition of net-like eggplant stupid sunbathing on the beach? Can jerk to Malaysia - Borneo or Cambodia? What will advise?

05.12.2013 17:14, Alex Dumchus:

My answer to Svetlana: the fact that we have from Rostov-on-Don flights via Bangkok, with a stop there back and forth for a couple of days. ECHO charter, and I think the tour operators temporarily stopped flying. Tomorrow, I will know.

05.12.2013 16:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily, thanks! I checked the link and other sources on the web. Summary. Nearly 100% sure this is P. brassicae. If compare with the web, there are some slight distinctions, can be just larvae age. Also they could have to do with uncertainty if there would be male or female after pupation. Should be checked biologically, documenting with shots, everything will be cleared up.
Pity no one prompted Pieris brassicae in the summer, maybe that was Ipomoea confusing...
So I think this could be moved to Pieris brassicae.

05.12.2013 16:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In fact it is not so scary, is not important to glow. If you have specific questions on Sri Lanke- I can help. It was in February this year.

05.12.2013 16:01, Svetlana Shchavelina:

05.12.2013 15:40, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Alexander, what do you think: all over Tae riots? Only in the capital. You're not coming to Bangkok to shoot butterflies, do not you? How many times I went to Tai (in the wild often) only Soidaow National Park saw a lot of butterflies on the river. Photographing them was extremely difficult: sit far away, and it is necessary to climb on the rocks. Here Laos in this regard - is much more interesting.There povylovilo local population of birds ate insects porazmnozhilis.

05.12.2013 15:17, Alex Dumchus:

Opachki ... so? Dmitriy. Thank you very much for the information. Then we have to think about whether to go at all? Maybe once in Thai? Maybe there soon all ustakanilos?

05.12.2013 15:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, and where the picture then?

05.12.2013 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, and I DrWeb not swear. Just "plug" that some with links to facebook, ak where I removed due spamoobilnosti this resource (and incidentally also the viral scrubbed after participating in this klyatyh facebook). I do not like facebook chronically (no offense to anyone) :)

05.12.2013 13:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UPD As I see, that's it, no thoughts of anything different?

05.12.2013 12:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, this pic seems left from the previous website when there was no enlarge option, there are lots of such. Better to check Pieris brassicae on Alexandr Boldyrev's website (aka Sungaya): http://insectamo.ru/larva/35-pieridae/73-pieris-brassicae

05.12.2013 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Aleksandr Andrianov Papilio oribazus / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.12.2013 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Aleksandr Andrianov Papilio peranthus / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.12.2013 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Cethosia biblis / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

05.12.2013 11:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio (Druryia) oribazus Boisduval, 1836

05.12.2013 11:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio (Achillides) peranthus Fabricius, 1787

05.12.2013 11:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cethosia biblis (Drury, 1773)

05.12.2013 11:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sri Lanka very carefully! Big penalties for any butterfly. Until imprisoned.

05.12.2013 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Or I got lost?

05.12.2013 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They weren't identified, were they?

05.12.2013 8:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Aleksandr Andrianov Chrysiridia rhipheus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.12.2013 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Aleksandr Andrianov Chrysiridia rhipheus / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.12.2013 5:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Here is something similar http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/4761, can't see clearly, no way to enlarge. Why anyway to have such if can't be properly seen? What's use of them?

05.12.2013 1:33, Yuri Semejkin:

There were tulip and Perilla nankinensis plants nearby. Cabbages were a bit far, around 30m aside.
I was watching these larvae for few days, took 2 more. They all refused eating Ipomoea and finally died. Ipomoea was damaged slightly, could be snails though.
Before pupation larvae stop eating but unlikely they just happened to get on Ipomoea to pupate. Here two arguments. 1. No larva eventually pupated at home (save the pupation couldn't be finished due to some inappropriate conditions which is doubtful); 2. They neither pupated on Ipomoea in the garden, I didn't spot at least one pupa. They could pupate into the soil, didn't see that though.
That's it. Nothing to add, Irina. melete and dulcinea larvae should be checked, of course.

04.12.2013 23:08, Irina Nikulina:

Yury, if not take into account Far East and Ipomoea, I'd suppose common Pieris brassicae (or shall I be corrected by some expert). Maybe some Brassicaceae grew somewhere close by and they just happened to get on Ipomoea? Or were they eating that? Some other Pieris species can be checked as well... Yet 3 out of 5 spread in that 40th region, are already out... melete and dulcinea larvae to check.

04.12.2013 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Any other thoughts?

04.12.2013 22:58, Peter Khramov:

Recalls the need to ship foty dried specimens of a single individual in the picture and without waste in the form of lines, if it all possible. This is not a book here on ph selections parameters are no less important than the individual pages ph.

04.12.2013 22:56, Peter Khramov:

Moving?

04.12.2013 22:55, Peter Khramov:

Now it should work correctly. If you find more errors in a program - reported.

04.12.2013 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Good rest.

04.12.2013 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the image above and duplication of some photons from the same individuals in the "other kind of pictures" - he is now corrected. If you still find that like - I beg to report.

04.12.2013 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Regarding example foty # 22918. Shamil foty who do not have a larger version, in which the increase is not taken into account. That was 21 - yes, it is a glitch, is now going to fly, I will now be 22. That is, 26 minus 4 foty that do not have large sizes. Ie everything is logical. Regarding the sort - it is now is just the time to download foty site.

04.12.2013 22:16, Peter Khramov:

Isparvil of moths / shovel.

04.12.2013 22:05, Peter Khramov:

Conceptionally.

04.12.2013 22:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Angerona prunaria?

04.12.2013 21:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Asked to tell anyone. I am afraid the wrong naopredelyat :)

04.12.2013 18:25, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, thanks, from the very beginning I felt this was Menispermum dahuricum, but Convolvulus hitched me and got me wrong direction) Started my search from food plant, I was looking for Convolvulaceae family and which larvae fed on them. Should be also added to food plants: plus to Menispermum larvae also feed on some Lardizabalaceae and Berberidaceae.

04.12.2013 15:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Larva is resting on Menispermum dahuricum, Eudocima tyrannus' main food plant accorded to V. S. Kononenko (2010).

04.12.2013 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima tyrannus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.12.2013 14:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima tyrannus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.12.2013 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima tyrannus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.12.2013 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima tyrannus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.12.2013 23:42, Peter Khramov:

I opened without swearing Kaspersky, but the site still does not have, besides the promise of Facebook and kaminsunov.

03.12.2013 22:36, Irina Nikulina:

Or, just version, Eudocima falonia, species also spread in Primorye. Images of these two species are confusing, I'll try now to find some links to falonia. tyrannus are in plenty on other websites.

03.12.2013 22:12, Irina Nikulina:

Eudocima tyrannus, nearly sure.

03.12.2013 20:18, Svetlana Shchavelina:

www.saturnidi.it

03.12.2013 19:46, Peter Khramov:

A website address is what? WMS, have treated already ...
ZY Gentlemen, let's get used to the new structure of the "Community", the theme explicitly for "photographing ..." and not for "the smoking room": -) There and suffered.

03.12.2013 18:40, Peter Khramov:

Shamil about the stock - Lepstor call the toll free number 8 (800) 775-60-95 and ask me to switch (better in the second half of the day in Moscow), or email me throw off your mobile and convenient time to call, I'll Dial. And so, without thinking, box 23h30 (30x40 or if the wait a little), I will send you free of charge Review.

03.12.2013 17:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very interesting, also lean to Notodontidae or another close family, checked quickly some Japanese websites, didn't find.

03.12.2013 8:58, Tatyana Nacvina:

I'm not an expert, tried to identify at least family, no way) Huge diversity. Only one seemed similar, Notodontidae (please forgive me if I'm wrong). Experts please help! Me and kids appreciate!

03.12.2013 2:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pechipogo strigilata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.12.2013 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can fly even on an ordinary candle (it all depends heavily on vneshnik factors: illumination, weather, etc.). Just nothing better DRL (the test of time and many people) because so and wrote :) Generator is not, and does not carry it no anything except their own hands. Was-would be possible only with the DRL would have caught in the field.

02.12.2013 20:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, you're so vain. Many things begins with such attempts and searches. While agree on DRL still flying :)
Interestingly, there are works on the insect response to different wavelengths of light emission. I would be honored.
Peter, apparently a lot of people here are waiting for proposals on the inventory, of which it is difficult to give up =)

02.12.2013 13:27, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Here's another passionate lover of butterflies: Lorenzo Comoglio.
Those who registered on Facebook - can see his blog: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Saturnidiit/156729611007226
Home to him I can not get out, Kaspersky swears and will not allow.

02.12.2013 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's actually the theme: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=72363 (it is necessary to read and weigh yourself).
And that's what we should strive: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=72363&view=findpost&p=941990
And: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526333&view=findpost&p=1430443 (Victor Sinyaev it's true: a well-known hunter). And forget about LEDs: IMHO mischief.

02.12.2013 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With LEDs man experimenting on molbiole the first year (see. The theme "Features of fishing in the world"): only the result of these experiments are zero or close to zero :). We strongly recommend to "reinvent the wheel", but use old, proven ways for years. LEDs? ........ It is ridiculous in this area to use them :)

02.12.2013 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa transiens / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

02.12.2013 8:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, bingo. Thanks!

02.12.2013 7:47, Shamil Murtazin:

Gasoline Generator - it is certainly very cool =)
A UV LEDs do not spravlyutsya? There are flashlights in the 400nm to 3-5 watts.
Peter, I'd take the pins the box and pravilku factory, to be compared with the homebrew twig ...

02.12.2013 7:20, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you, Peter.I winter to spring something that you offer - pin end N2, pin label - well, I do not like to impale them on a basic, raspravilki for mikry- blues, small satyrinae - the last time I even in the tropics do not catch because that my bad straightened, if you are with the groove 3 mm or less, and of the lamp,MB by the time you have and UV will.

02.12.2013 2:38, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, for lamps - mercury can you send for review.

01.12.2013 23:44, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, here I think this is Sarbanissa transiens. No references as they are the same we got in sundana thread.

01.12.2013 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Anna, yes, if the delivery is in Kaliningrad, it turns out quite expensive. And so - in Lepstore users Lepidoptera box usually is, even when the catalog is written that they are not. Well, the prices are also other, yeah: -)

01.12.2013 23:40, Irina Nikulina:

Probably Sinarella albeola
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/02_EREBIDAE/04_HERMINIINAE/24_Sinarella/Sinarella%20albeola/Sinarella%20albeola.htm. (There is a close species Sinarella c-album, but it's mentioned only in Japan on funet.fi and other websites http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/02Herminiinae/framepage_herminiinae.html (№84), http://gaga.biodiv.tw/9708bx/296.htm)

01.12.2013 23:40, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, photos can now be shipped to the comments on this site. There is no need to ship ne_babochek photo gallery.

01.12.2013 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the light I want to add: people usually take with a small gasoline generator (good if you have a car) and XRD: the best option of all.

01.12.2013 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, except for the envelopes, you can impale on site (taking appropriate container), and the rule at home: especially not Rhopalocera butterflies. And for the kill rate is nothing better until he came up with ethyl acetate.If you can not get a pure ethyl acetate and suitable liquid nail polish remover "Laska" (which is largely composed of ethyl acetate and is worth a penny). As for the world in the field: I want to try incandescent kerosene lamp: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74ZqzAPvvr4 presented on video third (last) should fly to it in my opinion?

01.12.2013 21:24, Shamil Murtazin:

I want to warn people that a split DRL to get more power to the UV light.
Be careful! In this case it is necessary to protect the eyes and, of course, the skin from high doses of ultraviolet radiation.
Sam climbed a couple of times under running lamps and the consequences were not so pleasant.Observe safety;)
It seems that the special problems in the field. As the light in the field you deliver?
Something other than envelopes for transporting the captured material it makes sense to use? (usually dragged into a small glass or plastic jars, because the backpack envelopes rasterёt into dust)
Book looked. Anecdotally.Ponastalgirovat mining benthos.
And the question arose. Moritelnye highly toxic substances are not advised. =)

01.12.2013 20:42, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. This can be at home, although we especially do not flies but small scoop and moths. Although the spring it is necessary to order Peter to the store.
Find how to compact fluorescent lamps to be used in the tropics, and customs was no problem ..

01.12.2013 18:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not accidentally pressed. I wish to add that the strong ambient light is better to take the power of 250 watts or less.
Well, from time to time, weather and other conditions, the effectiveness also depends, of course.

01.12.2013 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, if there are no problems with electricity as a source recommend using DRV or DRL. DRL better in that the outer cylinder can be split and obtain pure UV, and its disadvantage is, that it is necessary to carry a choke that heavy.DRV operates without a throttle, but the outer cylinder for pure UV stab at it impossible in any case. With strong

01.12.2013 18:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leucoma candida / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.12.2013 18:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

01.12.2013 18:11, Nastya Krujkova: This species is identified correctly.

01.12.2013 18:10, : This species is identified correctly.

01.12.2013 13:05, Alex Dumchus:

... Marching net is made of rod and landing net. for all his faults, he has one, but a very big advantage - instantly develops! I noticed that many people, especially abroad, are inadequate to the men (it's not the children!) And holding a Sachek and attracting unnecessary attention.For example, Thais, whom I met in the jungle, thinking that I catch birds, Latinos stopped and watched for a long time, his mouth open, and others. And so, I resigned for 2 seconds and go, kind of like an umbrella. That's about the light I have nothing comes out: I drive with a UV special.lamp (photo), I pull out the night in a hotel on the balcony, and it flew, mainly mosquitoes and sandflies. Peter, can that advise? Compact. I'm going to the end of January in Sri Lanka.

01.12.2013 13:02, Alex Dumchus:

In connection with a range of locations from the capital city, I have to do everything yourself. Raspravilki do from parquet boards, pasting thin sheets of polystyrene on top of the square, which is pasted over ceilings. Those squares are folded twice in the bottom of the box. Boxes can be obtained from well-Ikeevskih frames 40x50 (photo).Ribbon raspravilok comes from rolls of paper for baking. Under wardrobe boxes ordered Stanley (photo). Hiking Sachek made of rod and landing net.for all his faults, he has one, but a very big advantage - instantly develops! I noticed that many people, especially abroad, are inadequate to the men (it's not the children!) And holding a Sachek and attracting unnecessary attention.For example, Thais, whom I met in the jungle, thinking that I catch birds, Latinos stopped and watched for a long time, his mouth open, and others. And so, I resigned for 2 seconds and go, kind of like an umbrella. That's about the light I have nothing comes out: I drive with a UV special.lamp (photo), I pull out the night in a hotel on the balcony, and it flew, mainly mosquitoes and sandflies. Peter, can that advise? Compact. I'm going to the end of January in Sri Lanka.

01.12.2013 7:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Female / Sergei Kotov.

01.12.2013 7:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, forgot that: yet not awake :) Will do it now.

01.12.2013 7:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily, why didn't move this one. The same specimen.

01.12.2013 6:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Female / Sergei Kotov.

01.12.2013 6:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Pupa got of #25435 larva. There is also small pupa of supposedly Tachinidae parasite beside it. Here is something similar with another butterfly species http://zooex.baikal.ru/diptera/tachinidae.htm

01.12.2013 6:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Larva is infested with fly.

01.12.2013 6:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Tortricidae larva ? Food plant is Fraxinus sp

01.12.2013 1:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, agree. The shape of the apex spot is specific. So if no objections, should be moved.

30.11.2013 22:23, Irina Nikulina:

Why, I'm checking other Thailand photos (not identified), not the last one, they do vary a lot...

30.11.2013 14:09, Peter Khramov:

That's okay: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13980. As for the shadows - a philosophical question.

30.11.2013 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nearly no chance to get the truth, plenty of species, so variable, taxonomists shift genders incessantly, huge synonymy. Alas.

30.11.2013 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agathia codina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

30.11.2013 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Welcome any photos and collectible especially :) Criteria no. Perhaps you can take as an example a photo napodobii: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25421 naturally at the sides can be slightly reduced so as the name of writing is not necessary in my opinion.

30.11.2013 11:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Scopula insolata.

30.11.2013 11:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/2419 subgenus moths and photo scoops

30.11.2013 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.11.2013 20:56, Nastya Krujkova:

I want to cut the photos, which will reduce their "weight." What is the metric value of the "pure" from the expanded field background butterfly? Photo collection specimens welcome?

29.11.2013 16:25, Anna Bulgakova:

Peter, and where to get ready for less? If the delivery, it is still expensive.

28.11.2013 23:15, Irina Nikulina:

Agathia codina Swinhoe, 1892.
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/21_Agathia/Agathia%20codina/Agathia%20codina.htm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mothlady/6208648454/

28.11.2013 20:58, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, right, I noticed that mess as well, thought I didn't get something right) Though Guérin-Meneville, 1831 is more frequent as to this species) http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/search/detail.dsml?TaxonNo=82977.0
http://www.lba.uk.com/Zyganenidae-Gynautocera-Papilionaria-THAILAND_AO4CQ.aspx. You might have seen that already..

28.11.2013 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

So unclear there, didn't find the author of the gender but in Wikipedia :))) Gynautocera Guérin-Méneville, 1831, even two options, papilionaria Guérin-Meneville, 1831 and papilionaria Guerin, 1830, can't reference the gender to Wikipedia at any rate :)

28.11.2013 19:35, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, this gender seems to be disguised by Prosopandrophila Hering, 1922. Only there's a typo in Gynautocera, see below Prosopandrophila distincta.http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/zygaenoidea/zygaenidae/chalcosiinae/prosopandrophila/index.html. No papilionaria species there though. Check this http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/60_ZYGAENOIDEA/Zygaenidae/47_1%20Chalcosiinae/framepage%20Chalcosiinae%20N.html

28.11.2013 19:10, Irina Nikulina:

This one is likely to be Satoblephara owadai (Inoue, 1978), (here = Satoblephara parvularia (Leech, 1891)
http://taibif.tw/zh/catalogue_of_life/page/c7f1-6398-4c68-3426-f810-cd02-a853-b30f-namecode-345243 , http://catalog.digitalarchives.tw/item/00/5b/34/cf.html и
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bettaman/sets/72157605675181828/detail/?page=22

28.11.2013 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sarbanissa transiens / Vasiliy Feoktistov Sarbanissa sundana / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2013 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Neither I found it on funet...... Bad search?

28.11.2013 17:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can't find gender or species on the website on this. Or synonyms need to be added :)

28.11.2013 17:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, I checked Irina's links and other websites as well, sundana has the narrowest and straight black band on hind wings right as your specimen has, I'd move it to this species, even uncertain. :)

28.11.2013 16:12, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably Scopula insolata, http://www21.ocn.ne.jp/~k-yanagi/2-Geo-Sterrhinae.htm
http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Sterrhinae/Scopula_insolata_satsumaria.html, http://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42himesyaku.html

28.11.2013 15:12, Alex Dumchus:

Gynautocera papilionaria

28.11.2013 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved this to uncertain and it left comments for the photo page: some bug, perhaps.

28.11.2013 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, thanks. These beasts are "genitalia" ones, should be examined in details which I've never practiced. Moreover, I've got only one specimen, don't want to damage it. Move to uncertain till then :) Meh.......

28.11.2013 13:13, Irina Nikulina:

Nice comparison :) Still check sundana please, I met it somewhere in books. Quite common species in Malaysia, and these species despite variability have clear distinctions, here they're described in the transiens Diagnosis ttp://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-12/agaristinae/agaristinae_7_2.php. .. "a narrower postmedial white bar to the forewing" for transiens and "The hindwing black border is slightly narrower and more regular in sundana" (both species are given there)

28.11.2013 10:51, Irina Nikulina:

Pyotr, uploading a photo last few days, I noticed again that the right "Other photos of the same individual" duplicated in "Dr. Photo of this species." We returned to the previous version? Or is it a bug?

28.11.2013 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema complana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.11.2013 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.11.2013 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.11.2013 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.11.2013 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.11.2013 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.11.2013 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems that these ova are by the specimen from the next photos in this group? Why authors don't mention that? Moving all to females.

28.11.2013 10:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema complana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.11.2013 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema complana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.11.2013 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema complana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.11.2013 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema complana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.11.2013 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema complana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.11.2013 9:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.11.2013 9:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.11.2013 9:39, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

28.11.2013 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nemophora paradisea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2013 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nemophora paradisea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2013 6:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nemophora paradisea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.11.2013 6:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Always place for doubts, I put this one to sucessfully identified relying on its huge distribution and plenty of such there accorded to the collector. They are variable as hell...

28.11.2013 1:36, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, is it sure ID, no doubt? I may be wrong, some details are doubtful, particularly its size and white zone spreading, don't look specific for transiens. Didn't you consider Sarbanissa sundana Holloway? Please have a look at these two Malaysian http://jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/90_NOCTUOIDEA/05_NOCTUIDAE/08_AGARISTINAE/framepage_agaristinae.htm

27.11.2013 23:23, Irina Nikulina:

Nemophora paradisea Butler, 1881. Male

27.11.2013 23:22, Irina Nikulina:

Nemophora paradisea Butler, 1881. Male

27.11.2013 23:22, Irina Nikulina:

Nemophora paradisea Butler, 1881. Female

27.11.2013 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio polytes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.11.2013 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio polytes / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.11.2013 19:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abrostola tripartita / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.11.2013 18:58, Irina Nikulina:

Abrostola tripartita?

27.11.2013 16:42, Nastya Krujkova: This species is identified correctly.

27.11.2013 16:35, Nastya Krujkova: This species is identified correctly.

27.11.2013 16:32, Nastya Krujkova: This species is identified correctly.

27.11.2013 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Morpho helenor / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

27.11.2013 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.11.2013 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.11.2013 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.11.2013 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parides photinus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.11.2013 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Parides photinus / Confidently identified / Female / Alex Dumchus.

27.11.2013 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parides photinus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.11.2013 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parides photinus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.11.2013 6:32, Alex Dumchus:

parides photinus

27.11.2013 6:31, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo mamnon and Morpho helenor

27.11.2013 6:30, Alex Dumchus:

Mainly Caligo memnon, Siproeta stelenes on the left

27.11.2013 6:28, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo memnon

27.11.2013 6:27, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho helenor, male

27.11.2013 6:26, Alex Dumchus:

parides photinus, female

27.11.2013 6:25, Alex Dumchus:

parides photinus

27.11.2013 6:24, Alex Dumchus:

Parides photinus

27.11.2013 1:00, Peter Khramov:

Stunner!

27.11.2013 0:36, Irina Nikulina:

First one, from today) One of these three heroes http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/24144, pupated in the very unusual conditions)

26.11.2013 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas guatemalena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2013 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hamadryas guatemalena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2013 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spathilepia clonius / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2013 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spathilepia clonius / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2013 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The sheet on a rope, and the lamp next to it: you can not bother with all sorts of bells and whistles in particular (if it is at the country house of her aunt) :) House on the balcony is also a sheet with three lamps: Repti Glo 8.0 (10.0) T8 15W 45cm UV + two sberegayki Camelion LH26 -3U / BLB / E27 26W 220V and flying normally for the city.
Shamil, a good book is the basics here: http://rghost.ru/50469097 Especially today put :)

26.11.2013 21:21, Peter Khramov:

If there is a bright wall, and with it the electricity nemerenoe number - that is very conducive to: -) And so on responses it turns out that four-sided frame and trap with a mercury lamp in the center - the most it.

26.11.2013 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Urbanus dorantes / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2013 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Urbanus dorantes / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

26.11.2013 19:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Write-write =)
Homemade out and homemade. It considered normal if twice as expensive, but its unique "charm".
At night, catch on the sheet, or "tent" to put DRLkami? (I never have been there, but interesting)

26.11.2013 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

I think this is Neptis andetria

26.11.2013 18:53, Irina Nikulina:

Certainly thanks! Turns out the species mentioned in Synev's Catalogue only in Primorye is also in Priamurye.

26.11.2013 18:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identified by O. Gorbunov on molbiol http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=359451&st=200&p=1450225#entry1450225. Many thanks to him.

26.11.2013 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Synanthedon bicingulata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.11.2013 18:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

26.11.2013 17:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaorhinus reciprocata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.11.2013 17:27, Irina Nikulina:

Tanaorhinus reciprocata Walker

26.11.2013 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very nice view.

26.11.2013 14:59, Sergey Titov: This species is identified correctly.

26.11.2013 14:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthia togata / Sergey Titov Xanthia icteritia / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.11.2013 13:58, Irina Nikulina:

Let's wait for expert opinion. There might be few more relative species in Thailand with such larvae—pupae)

26.11.2013 13:07, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hoorray! I'm glad the page of this amazing butterfly will be added with photos of other development stages!

26.11.2013 11:13, Irina Nikulina:

So cleared up) now no matter whether it's lime, lemon or any variegate Citrus, definitely not guava). Now we can be more sure this is Papilio polytes, which larvae feed on Citrus and other Rutaceae.

26.11.2013 10:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Leucodonta bucoloria. Identified by E. A. Belyaev, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

26.11.2013 6:39, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Our pardon about food plant... My Thailand friend replied: "Sorry I misunderstand with another plant. This is lime or lemon ... Bigger fruit and not perfect round shape and people use it when little yellow"

26.11.2013 1:13, Maxim Schwarz:

Gobbler :-)))))

25.11.2013 20:44, Shamil Murtazin:

More photos about this moment (and probably related to the previous).
Select the photo, such as # 22918, for clarity. Increase by clicking on the picture and start flipping.
It seems to me, after the first pictures should go "More pictures from the same individual" (abbr. Foto_Osobi ), but the photos are from "Other photos of this species" (abbr. Foto_Vida ), moreover, in this case are not captured pictures before 9719 - it is the first that can be increase for this species.
Number of photos - 21 Why, if all 26 photos? (if the "hands" to count).The first four do not take into account (# 3611, # 3612, # 3974, # 5231) - 26-4 = 22
Not counted photo of Foto_Osobi (3 "minus" 1 viewing photos = 2) - 22-2 = 20
However, the first photo of the Foto_Osobi is present in the Foto_Vida - 20 + 1 = 21

P.S. If you watch the photo, is not tied to the group, there will be 22 photos (-4 "old-fashioned")
P.P.S. I hope I will not betray anathema then =)

25.11.2013 20:39, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio polytes? http://www.butterflycircle.blogspot.ru/2011/10/life-history-of-common-mormon.html

25.11.2013 20:30, Irina Nikulina:

If still suppose this is not a guava plant but some Rutaceae / Citrinae, then it could be Papilio polytes then.

25.11.2013 18:22, Peter Khramov:

If you order a lot, it's true of the Czech Republic can be beneficial (except boxes and other oversize cargo). If a little - the Nea -) With regards samopal, then if it is true at cost 900 pe goes, it's not worth it. You can not take the expensive factory.

25.11.2013 16:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Twisted case of Cosmia trapezina larva.

25.11.2013 16:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Comibaena delicator.

25.11.2013 16:04, Irina Nikulina:

Svetlana, I could only say that I never met guava plant in descriptions whilst Citrinae (the Rutaceae family, subfamily Aurantioideae) include many guavas. For one, Poncirus trifoliata with same big thorns, this plant is widely used for parent stock. Its berries look quite similar as guava fruits. I'm not a botanist though, so I consulted with paleobotanist from Vladivostok, candidate of geologo-mineralogical sciences, E. B. Volynets, so she deems that this could be some Poncirus trifoliata, she provided pic where it has thorns as in your photo, leaves are variegate.

25.11.2013 14:25, Svetlana Shchavelina:

One Thailand guy said this plant is guava. I even took a picture, just in case, for any possible doubts. And the guava was variegate, larvae selectively munched over variegate leaves and didn't touch the branches with green (that happens) leaves.

25.11.2013 13:11, Irina Nikulina:

Svetlana, If I didn't read that line about the guava plant, I'd say it looks very similar to Papilio rumanzovia. I saw pupae not once http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21416. Larva looks quite similar, imho, http://kukolki-babochek.ru/babochka-papilio-rumanzovia/papilio-rumanzovia-24591-rl_0/ So I checked as well close Thailand species, but their food plants include many — garcinia, gardenia, citruses, Aristolochiaceae, Rutaceae — anything but Myrtaceae (guava).

25.11.2013 2:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

25.11.2013 1:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.11.2013 1:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is no Comibaena subdelicata Inoue, 1985 on the Japanese website, by the way there is Comibaena subdelicata Inoue, 1986 , quite rare thing.

25.11.2013 1:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Comibaena subdelicata
http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/74_Geometridae/72.7_Geometrinae/2226Comibaena/2231.1Comibaena_subdelicata/Comibaena%20subdelicata%20.htm
http://blog.daum.net/onidiras/15869765
http://www.genebank.go.kr/PB/st/cyberView.bo?species_id=ZR1CI9999&viewMenuList=0

25.11.2013 0:56, Irina Nikulina:

Let's it stays in uncertain so far) Agree that subdelicata doesn't fit the location, still I never met delicatior with such a broad white spot. I tried these links from my login, everything opens, would be great if you anyway check these. Alexandr, it looks so subdelicata!

25.11.2013 0:39, Irina Nikulina:

These two species are very similar. The Moths of Borneo website features both, Alexandr, please check http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_13_3.php and http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-9/geometrini/geometrini_13_3.php. Images are poor but the margin of its forewing is still confusing. And photos on other websites. Still can be rafflesii though.

25.11.2013 0:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

I can't check either of these links, not relevant though. As I got it, Thai means Thailand. Comibaena subdelicata is distributed on southern Japanese islands and Taiwan as opposed to widely distributed Comibaena delicatior. Besides, a number of websites show it lacks white margin spot on forewings whilst Comibaena delicatior has this spot, more or less, but always. Can be something another as well, neither of these two. Comibaena delicatior, uncertain, then? Your opinion, Irina?

25.11.2013 0:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Some misunderstanding here: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/Digital_Moths_of_Asia/85_GEOMETROIDEA/04_GEOMETRIDAE/07_Geometrinae/13_Tanaorhinus/Tanaorhinus%20rafflesii/Tanaorhinus%20rafflesii.htm

24.11.2013 23:35, Irina Nikulina:

Sasha, I was checking carefully) Hesitated between Comibaena subdelicata and Comibaena delicatior. But the colour of the forewing spots and the white area coverage... This made me sure http://www.oocities.org/hk/geometridaetw/orientalgeo.65.htm ) + http://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42aosyaku.html ) Please check, they're both shown on the latter link. If I'm wrong, looking forward to the right ID)

24.11.2013 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tanaorhinus viridiluteata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.11.2013 23:05, :

Tanaorhinus viridiluteata (Walker, 1861)
http://mypaper.pchome.com.tw/balame/post/1321642135
http://www.hkwildlife.net/viewthread.php?tid=62573

24.11.2013 23:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, don't want to deprive you of the identifier title, the gender is right, another species, look more, very close. :)

24.11.2013 22:05, Irina Nikulina:

Comibaena subdelicata Inoue, 1985

24.11.2013 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysodeixis chalcites / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.11.2013 10:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysodeixis chalcites / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.11.2013 5:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, didn't see the comment, did quickly :)

24.11.2013 5:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Irina Nikulina.

24.11.2013 2:04, Anna Bulgakova:

Zero pin really awkward, bent when sticking, but small butterflies without them spread. All equipment is ordered directly from the Czech Republic in EntoSfinks. At first it was very profitable, but the last time through PeyPel overpaid 2 t. Rub. And that's about the box, and no torment. I got http://ru-butterflies.livejournal.com/80955.html#cutid1 Thanks to author!

23.11.2013 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia fatima / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 22:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia fatima / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, this was Irina who made the ID. :)

23.11.2013 22:26, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, corrected.

23.11.2013 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agraulis vanillae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.11.2013 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agraulis vanillae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.11.2013 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus gilippus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo memnon / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morpho helenor / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morpho helenor / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Danaus gilippus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Canephora hirsuta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

23.11.2013 19:40, Irina Nikulina:

Most probably Canephora hirsuta?

23.11.2013 19:05, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho helenor

23.11.2013 19:04, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho helenor

23.11.2013 18:30, Irina Nikulina:

Peter and the family and the tribe http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/520 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/2292 in the subfamily Tortricinae illustrated moth.

23.11.2013 18:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Heliconius charithonia.

23.11.2013 18:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Heliconius erato emma Riffarth, 1901

23.11.2013 18:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Heliconius erato petiverana

23.11.2013 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius erato / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius erato / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

23.11.2013 18:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Heliconius erato petiverana

23.11.2013 16:31, Alex Dumchus:

Danaus gilippus

23.11.2013 16:20, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo memnon

23.11.2013 16:19, Alex Dumchus:

Heliconius charitonia

23.11.2013 16:18, Alex Dumchus:

Anartia fatima

23.11.2013 16:16, Alex Dumchus:

Heliconius erato

23.11.2013 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anteos maerula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.11.2013 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anteos maerula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.11.2013 13:47, Irina Nikulina:

I agree about the placement of such inf. on the page of the form. As it happens - where Peter said, there is discussion of the matter). Maybe you or Peter will transfer correctly to the page Notodonta, links everything. In general, an interesting situation - Far taxonomy has long been attributed to Peridea view, according to the year of publication "Key .."But it is not accepted? While such differences probably are not uncommon ..

23.11.2013 12:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Ira, I'm probably not quite understand correctly, if you do not add the following information on the page is best kind of writing, the interest of everyone to see, and here it will be gone. Indeed probably need to remove one i,? To funet.fi in error.

23.11.2013 12:09, Irina Nikulina:

Alexander, so like to add one extra page was not going to just give information - I wrote that on Chinese websites Peridea jankowskii given as a synonym for Notodonta (in Sinev on funet.fi and others. Foreign sites also given in the form of old Notodonta) . But in the Russian Far East to the insects, according to Yuri, and article Dubatolov appears Peridea. Only specials am to decide what is accepted scientific name, and what is a synonym.Only now it turned right on page 2 Notodonta - http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/22133 and http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/67083. Both ways of writing occur on funet.fi - a i, ii Sinёve- in, at most two M.I.Yankovskogo list ii)

23.11.2013 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, there is some fault, cleary something different. Thanks.

23.11.2013 10:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra perflua / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

23.11.2013 10:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Amphipyra perflua / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

23.11.2013 10:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Friends, you do something wrong you know what type you want to add Peridea jankowskii, he is on the site, but in a sort Notodonta jankowskii (Oberthur, 1879), why make this site a synonym? Now I add synonymous in Notodonta jankowskii.

23.11.2013 10:22, Andrey Ponomarev:

Those were laid by #25246 female, in ovarium.
Sadly I threw them out, didn't wait for larvae.
If I only knew that its ova overwinter.

23.11.2013 7:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Description Peridea jankowskii Obth given in to the insects of Russian Far East, Volume 5, Part 3, pages 555-556. Vladivostok, 2001

23.11.2013 4:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Regarding Gastropacha watanaebi Okano, 1966 (lives in the Far East)? The genus of about 12 species. For DV including 4.
1. Gastropacha orientalis Shel;
2. G. quercifolia. In the Far East subspecies cerridifolia Feld. et Feld;
3. G. populifolia Esp On DV subspecies angustipennis Wlk.
4. G. clathrata Bryk.
Source: Keys to insects of the Far East of Russia. Volume 5, Part 2 Str.610-612
With regard Gastropacha watanaebi Okano, 1966, this type in the description of this source is not listed.

23.11.2013 1:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, Oleg Pekarsky talked much about them in the thread about Acronictinae on molbiol.ru, check there please. Can't say better, also skill, and by photo without genitalia examination, pure guesswork.

23.11.2013 0:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

0000-00-00 00:00:00 2013-08-20 00:00:00.

22.11.2013 22:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexandr, direct flash light.
Couldn't opt one...

22.11.2013 22:55, Shamil Murtazin:

Andrey, thanks, I got it. Cuspis has dark line going from its head amidst the "back".
Still there is also tridens... any exterior features?..
(want to clear it properly up)

22.11.2013 21:33, Andrey Ponomarev:

Shamil, please check this http://lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acronicta_Cuspis

22.11.2013 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acronicta psi / Vitaly Gumenuk Acronicta cuspis / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.11.2013 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

What's the difference between this pic and http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/23193

22.11.2013 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.11.2013 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.11.2013 20:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.11.2013 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.11.2013 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

22.11.2013 16:55, Shamil Murtazin:

How do you distinguish them? =)
Please check also
http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/22960
http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/23193

22.11.2013 16:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Andrey, please, are these ova picked in nature or laid by "caught" specimens, in "ovarium"?

22.11.2013 14:27, Peter Khramov:

Okay, now let's leave ...

22.11.2013 9:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

As the tapes raspravki I use stationery files (thick), I cut them into strips. They are transparent and do not drag them nothing sticks.

22.11.2013 9:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pins 1 and 3 of the other mischief.

22.11.2013 2:09, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Well, I was thinking like this: what similar species is a closest to Kharkov? If they don't migrate, then should interrogate the author, if he happened to visit the South Caucasus or Middle Asia when was a child ;)

22.11.2013 2:00, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Isn't there is some ID mistake? Looks so unsimilar to #18796.

21.11.2013 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Likely to be.

21.11.2013 23:18, Irina Nikulina:

Celypha lacunana?

21.11.2013 22:10, Igor Sakhno:

You bet!

21.11.2013 20:21, Peter Khramov:

Pins - size 0 or 1 plus 2 or 3 tape raspravilok special sale, is very inexpensive. Wooden box 30x40 or 40x50 (more common and the furniture is made for them, too).

21.11.2013 18:54, Shamil Murtazin:

Hello!..
Advise a small range of accessories, which plans to use next summer.
Plans night lamp for the purpose of gathering pofotkat ... and interesting specimens - collected. Plus broods gusyanok and occasional meetings with Butterflies.
Please consider my small experience in this topic and yet for me it's a hobby.This year tried - found the smallest pin, the master of the gasket materials raspravilki.And it started to like it :) swallowtail box (found on the track downed)
I think I need a pin in two sizes - great for "Krupnyakov" (all that more psi =) and small (less than everything)
I want to know what will advise as to raspravilke tape. The polyethylene and tracing ...The first is too soft, the other is opaque and flakes collects.
And most importantly - a box underneath the whole thing ... Of course, while I do not think about the cabinet with trays, but this option should be envisaged in the future. =)

21.11.2013 18:44, Fyodor Pudovikov:

If there is any reliable feature to make it possible to distinguish these two species by photo? If not, let's be consistent and move this and other photos of these two species to uncertain or move this image to successfully identified as there were no up-to-date founds of A. agestis, or namely specimens which could be only by exterior referred to A. agestis.

21.11.2013 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

21.11.2013 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhagades pruni / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

21.11.2013 3:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I'm quite far from being a Zygaenidae expert, anyway I believe Igor is absolutely right. This is male in the photo. If my sclerosis doesn't fool me, pruni has yellow (reduced) proboscis whilst other "greens" don't. Seems yellow here. Plus pruni is rather to be blue than green, what we also can see. :)

21.11.2013 1:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Just check Zygaenidae on Savchuk's website "Crimean lepidoptera" :)

21.11.2013 1:07, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, sadly Vladimir's website is designed so that giving links to some pages is a tough thing...

21.11.2013 0:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Igor, there are 10 more species in the Crimea, so-called "green" Zygaenidae. Check Savchuk's website http://www.lepidoptera.crimea.ua/frame.htm, I'm not sure what's this species, fits 3 but a few :)

21.11.2013 0:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hecatera bicolorata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

21.11.2013 0:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia artaxerxes / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

21.11.2013 0:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, those who think it's really easy to differ these two Aricia, see the world through pink glasses. :) Sure, there are obvious cases, but to deal with our Kharkov butterflies, I can't clear it up without "rocket artillery" (which I hope some day I'll finally get in use :) Tough case... :) Anyway, as to this specimen, I'd rather lean to Sergey, not surely though. I'd move it to uncertain.

21.11.2013 0:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Everything is possible in theory... Even bear happens to fly... :) At least two things are confusing here: first, it was never noticed in the Black Sea Coast as against well-known migrants such as L. boeticus and L. pirithous, not to mention even more northern regions (please correct me If I'm ignorant), second, is this really Ch. galba? Similar to some extent, far from being sure though.

21.11.2013 0:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, I didn't check Hecatera bicolorata, here they are really different, I've just checked websites, aaaand...... most likely, will have one more thought and move it. :)

20.11.2013 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Well wow.

20.11.2013 23:10, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, so you gave up Hecatera bicolorata? Maybe it's still this, some Far East variation? Looks very likely Crimean bicolorata (I checked molbiol) and also here http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Hecatera_Bicolorata. Of course, to my not an expert opinion.

20.11.2013 21:54, Igor Sakhno:

This is probably Rhagades pruni ?

20.11.2013 21:04, Peter Khramov:

Jan, I've just tried Arctornis l-nigrum and autosuggestion has worked. Regarding "very common species of butterfly", write me please the exact name, I'll try it.

20.11.2013 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tough nut. :) Last Noctuidae by Dina.

20.11.2013 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Actinotia intermediata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.11.2013 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta cuspis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.11.2013 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta catocaloida / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.11.2013 19:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

I didn't take a pause, just forgot. Checking the red for a while and finally it turned out nearly yellow. :)

20.11.2013 19:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala helena / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

20.11.2013 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Urapteroides astheniata / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

20.11.2013 9:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Urapteroides astheniata

19.11.2013 23:20, Jan van Holten:

Hello again,

The search engine does not work properly. When a species is not on the site, you don't get a message that it is not available. Also I tried to find a very common species of butterfly, but when using the ''search button'' I can't find it.
I photograph a lot of caterpillars in the north-east part of Poland and was hoping this site would help me with putting a name on the species. So hopefullly you can solve the problem. Of course I will place a lot of images on your site to help you with building it up to a really good and complete database.

Jan van Holten

19.11.2013 22:57, Jan van Holten: This species is identified correctly.

19.11.2013 22:25, Jan van Holten:

Hello,

I've just got my account and started to look around on the site. I want tot search on specific
caterpillars like Arctornis l-nigrum, but I have big problems to get there. So I filled in the name ''Arctornis l-nigrum'' but it doesn't show up. What am I doing wrong???

Thank you,

Jan

19.11.2013 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, as well as anyone not Efetov lists you author the section on zygaenidae, just as he has written books on it. :), But to describe the types and subtypes pestryanok from the Crimea, it is my personal opinion, drobitelstvo and childbirth seems to me, too. No I do not want to offend anyone, but I can express my opinion. :)

19.11.2013 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Actually, yes, I told him about and answer. But in the blue family pestryanok namely Constantine and describes panimaish what was going on; -)

19.11.2013 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, I am personally against. Now the site has a system on which it rests is the directory blue, fauna of Europe and Funet. It should start small things and we are all broken. Can Efetov and rights and maybe elevated to a subgenus of labor. In such a large site need to be somewhat inert, fewer errors will have to be corrected.

19.11.2013 0:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Diachrysia chrysitis / Vitaly Gumenuk Diachrysia stenochrysis / Masha Gill.

19.11.2013 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Diachrysia chrysitis / Vitaly Gumenuk Diachrysia stenochrysis / Alexandr Zhakov.

19.11.2013 0:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Sideridis rivularis Callopistria juventina.

18.11.2013 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.11.2013 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

18.11.2013 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.11.2013 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.11.2013 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.11.2013 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

18.11.2013 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Female Male.

18.11.2013 21:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

18.11.2013 17:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Op-pa ... I Thought to be smaller thumbnails ... :(

18.11.2013 17:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Try images ...
Gluck described above.

18.11.2013 15:11, Peter Khramov:

Messrs, I was contacted by Konstantin Efetov, he proposes to upgrade the classification of the family Zygaenidae Procridinae according to the audit Efetov KA, Tarmann GM A checklist of the Palaearctic Procridinae (Lepidoptera: Zygaenidae). - Simferopol - Innsbruck: CSMU Press: Nata, 2012. In particular, the "kind Illiberis Walker, 1854 is currently divided into 4 separate genus. Type H. hyalina currently belong to the genus Hedina Alberti, 1954, and not to Illiberis ». Those in favor, who is against who abstained?

18.11.2013 7:15, Shamil Murtazin:

The very snout it is. On its "back". Not a big one.

18.11.2013 1:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema sororcula / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.11.2013 0:40, Irina Nikulina:

Eilema sororcula?

18.11.2013 0:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Overwintering moth, flies till late autumn and since early spring. This is not a snout but "lips" :)

18.11.2013 0:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Fancy snout :)

17.11.2013 22:52, Peter Khramov:

Mozgoshturm - is always good. More to storms: -)
"The site is mainly engaged in the loading and cataloging photos."
Let's hope this is a temporary phenomenon. Now along with new modules are new casting description, I hope more people join and / will be active on this matter to lean."For those who need it? Honestly - I thought, what if the screw die ... "
For such a case, I think it's not worth it. After all, the probability of such an event is low, and in which case, the photographer can simply contact me, I'll do it from the inside with a screwdriver, and tell him - to me it would be much easier than to sculpt a universal interface for all authors.If even for a moment what it should be - reported. Technically, of itself, it is ...

"An interesting option would be to remove the logo from a photo. Name at least - did not really like the inscription on the photo. "
Logo there. There is a photographer's name and website address.This information is needed if only because that foty active site are taken away (and it is incurable), respectively, even though at any spectator will be clear who the author is and where the picture was taken initially (to remove signatures ph ordinary people lazy, taschyat as is).Signatures are implanted in the image (for the same purpose), so set up their show - a city still thousands of photons, and their zapryatyvat time output images on the screen. Ie horror, the horror.

"We need a geolocation."
It is not clear what they mean. Now this theme gives birth interfaces for interaction with GugloMepsami, but to give birth to a very long time and in agony.I think, well, if born to NY ...

17.11.2013 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, in my opinion, it is currently an adequate crop of these photons, well, the place to head there.

17.11.2013 22:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, always leave room on the third head of the butterfly.
This time, clearly trying to cut so that the free space in front of the head remained.
All images with the flash, by the way)
(http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25158)

17.11.2013 22:41, Peter Khramov:

I do not see any changes. In the paragraphs to normal paragraphs, calm, in the headlines - the usual for titles. Including and intervals.

17.11.2013 22:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Omg... head-crab )

17.11.2013 22:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Paragraph Style in my same post (http://lepidoptera.ru/community/18557) after the second title has changed - the distance between the lines and probably the font size.

17.11.2013 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.11.2013 22:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.11.2013 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.11.2013 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

17.11.2013 22:26, Shamil Murtazin:

This post dashed, and he took and lost ... badly upset. Try again.
The preamble was initially. That evening a lot of interesting thoughts. Blah blah blah ... Mozgoshturm, always do. Maybe useful.

The proposal is one


The site is mainly engaged in the loading and cataloging photos.And that if you give the opportunity to download a photo? If scary "accessibility" - the authors provide such an option - to download all your photos.
But such an archive photo swing with daddy unfolding of taxa and / or delivery.
An interesting option would be to remove the logo from a photo. Name at least - did not really like the inscription on the photo.For those who need it? Honestly - I thought, what if the screw die ...

Number Two


The classification presented sequentially nameplates and photos.
However, I see the logical view tree. You can do this alternative representation.Photos can be inserted podgruzku hover on rhodium or view and display it near the cursor.

Three


Need geolocation. Until at length, and will without reference "to the ground."

17.11.2013 21:50, Shamil Murtazin:

When removing foty does not check it in groups. It can lead to bugs.
Example - photo # 25154 deleted, but it is in the group ph - (Also in this group: # 25156, # 25155, # 25154, # 25158)

17.11.2013 20:48, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, thanks, I saw this photo on catocala.narod.ru, deemed it vague, so didn't mention it and told about Synanthedon hector, seemed that none of those three Synev species fitted. Would be great to put it on molbiol, please decide)

17.11.2013 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, this pic is from the first thousand, here is for about 5 years already, no one touched it, do you offer to wait for another 5 years? I think it will be ok to put it on molbiol. Dina won't be upset and the case is curious, maybe new species in Russia.

17.11.2013 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sesiidae on molbiol are in this thread: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=359451&st=0. There you can also find Oleg Gorbunov (under Melitia). Just FYI: this is Dina's photo, she has to upload it there herself.

17.11.2013 20:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, here's S. herzi image http://catocala.narod.ru/ses09.html, not a candidate at all. Whilst yours looks very similar to Synanthedon hector. Synev's Catalogue is not a dogma, just a guide. Should show this pic to Gorbunov on molbiol.ru and give his ID here, on the website. :)

17.11.2013 19:35, Irina Nikulina:

If Synanthedon, then can be nothing but S. herzi Spatenka & Gorbunov, 1992, most probably. There are only three Synanthedon species in Amur region, scoliaeformis, spheciformis and herzi. This is definitely not S. scoliaeformis, neither S. spheciformis. If not read Synev, I'd rather say this is Synanthedon hector (Butler, 1878) distributed in Japan and China http://www.jpmoth.org/Sesiidae/Sesiinae/Synanthedon_hector.html, http://www.k3.dion.ne.jp/~kamikiri/clearwingmoth/kosukashiba.html. Flew to Priamurye?)

17.11.2013 17:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, when you notice something, please don't hesitate to doubt openly, so easy to make a mistake or miss something. We all try to check and verify questionable cases, I'm not totally sure, not familiar with these larvae, just checked websites, maybe we're both wrong with the author. Just I don't move if not sure. Anyway all moderators need help and prompts. Thanks.

17.11.2013 16:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

17.11.2013 16:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Yponomeuta kanaiellus / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

17.11.2013 16:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yponomeuta kanaiellus.

17.11.2013 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

17.11.2013 15:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Yponomeuta kanaiella Matsumura

17.11.2013 15:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Yponomeuta kanaiella Matsumura

17.11.2013 15:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Confidently identified Yponomeuta kanaiellus / Tentatively identified.

17.11.2013 15:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

No species, will add right now.

17.11.2013 15:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

17.11.2013 15:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is a new species in Russia, move to uncertain with hope that Margarita Ponomarenko, a good expert in this group, and waiting for the remark on the species description page concerning its found in Russia. Then will move to identified confidently.

17.11.2013 15:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Ira, you're right! The first letter is indeed "K" (kanaiella). Found my notebook with IDs and identifiers. Could have checked it before. So my pardon to all.

17.11.2013 14:26, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr is right, there is a mistake and this is called Yponomeuta kanaiellus Matsumura, 1931. http://www.jpmoth.org/Yponomeutidae/Yponomeutinae/Yponomeuta_kanaiellus.html

17.11.2013 13:35, Andrey Ponomarev:

Oops, I thought it was mistake. Pardon.

17.11.2013 12:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, are you pretty sure? I've checked, that black stripe never goes to the very down at Cerura vinula.

17.11.2013 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, are you sure? I checked, this black stripe never goes till the very down at Cerura vinula.

17.11.2013 12:38, Irina Nikulina:

Refinement of Peridea jankowskii . Here is the article, which refers to the transfer of the species from the genus to genus Notodonta Peridea - V.V.Dubatolov, AM Long "New findings night makrocheshuekrylyh (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Macroheterocera) in Bolshekhekhtsirsky Reserve (near Khabarovsk) in the spring of 2009 2008g.i." Amur Zoological Journal 1 (2) 2009 http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/vvdubat/ pdf / AZJ1% 282% 29135-139.pdf
And the Chinese Notodonta jankowski Oberthür, 1879 - accepted scientific name, and is given as a synonym Peridea http://data.sp2000.cn/2012u_cnode_e/show_species_details.php? name_code = 6b81dcff-28bb-48b0-8c34-7b80e140d7da

17.11.2013 12:32, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is also Cerura vinula, Cerura erminea has this black back stripe broken.

17.11.2013 12:31, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Cerura vinula

17.11.2013 11:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siproeta stelenes / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

17.11.2013 11:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius hecalesia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.11.2013 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius hecalesia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

17.11.2013 11:23, Alex Dumchus:

This is really it. They're raised there — Siproeta stelenes

17.11.2013 11:22, Alex Dumchus:

Heliconius hecalesia

17.11.2013 11:21, Alex Dumchus:

Heliconius hecalesia

17.11.2013 9:31, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, everything that is on funete, there are Lepidoptera, you can not scan (except for the latest updates) ... And ... And Fauna Sinev ...

17.11.2013 1:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Could you please tell where may I get info about larva hatch of soil and pupation? And where they crawl then.

17.11.2013 1:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

On funete, this species http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/bombycoidea/lasiocampidae/gastropachinae/gastropacha/index.html
Japan has a butterfly. they put a footnote: Identification Guide of Japanese Moths (jpmoth.org)

17.11.2013 1:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Greatest respect to this photographer. :)

17.11.2013 0:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Shamil, if there will be something gone out, please inform us :)

16.11.2013 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Modernizing the Lord, fill pliz this kind with a thread decent source ...

16.11.2013 23:49, Irina Nikulina:

We're all, not experts, not infallible) Still trying) My far from now introduction to macrophotography began with his very photos by GUM (his nickname on photosight.ru).

16.11.2013 23:46, Shamil Murtazin:

http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/25024
In general the pictures appear one of the photos of the group.

16.11.2013 23:44, Shamil Murtazin:

I "planted" it to a glass jar... Not sure if it will overwinter anyway...

16.11.2013 23:38, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, but in appearance Gastropacha watanaebi Okano, 1966 synonyms are not met, it seems, just do not have here, as well as other certain types Gastropacha. Their many http://www.ubio.org/browser/search.php?search_all=Gastropacha

16.11.2013 22:29, Peter Khramov:

Irina, thank you. So, Nericoides dawidi, Nericoides leechi and Peridea jankowskii site have synonyms. A Furcula infumata and Furcula lanigera with Odontosia arnoldiana, it seems, is just flying by. By Gastropacha watanaebi Okano, 1966 whether there is information?

16.11.2013 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As the photo is in the group, moved all to suasa :) These species are nearly twins, "like two drops of water".

16.11.2013 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia oleracea Lacanobia suasa.

16.11.2013 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia oleracea Lacanobia suasa.

16.11.2013 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia oleracea Lacanobia suasa.

16.11.2013 22:19, Irina Nikulina:

Now, Peridea jankowskii Oberthur, 1879. This former Notodonta jankowskii, it seems. The transfer of the species from the genus to genus Peridea Notodonta associated with
the structure of the genital apparatus of males. It was in the article V. Dubatolov until I can find, but look for.

16.11.2013 22:08, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I corrected.

16.11.2013 21:47, Irina Nikulina:

By Furcula:
Posted P. Morozov molbiole http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=184446:
"Furcula bicuspis Borkhausen, 1790 (= infumata)
I refer to A. Schintlmeister: taxon infumata Staudinger, 1887 has the status of the form "
and hereinafter "Some authors Far F. bicuspis and F. furcula are both respectively F. infumata and F. lanigera."

16.11.2013 21:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, check please this photo http://www.lepiforum.de/webbbs/images/forum_2/pic5545.jpg, maybe Shamil meant gender and different species from Lacanobia oleracea to L. suasa, I think the latter is right one.

16.11.2013 21:24, Irina Nikulina:

Nerice (Nerice) Walker, 1855
Synonyms Nericoides Matsumura, 1925, Paranerice Kiriakoff, 1963 http://www.thefullwiki.org/Nerice_%28Nerice%29
There - Nerice davidi, Nerice leechi

16.11.2013 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia oleracea / Tentatively identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.11.2013 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia oleracea / Tentatively identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.11.2013 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia oleracea / Tentatively identified / Shamil Murtazin.

16.11.2013 21:11, Irina Nikulina:

Odontosia sieversii ussurica Bytinski-Saltz, 1939 (=arnoldiana Kardakoff, 1928, infraspecific)

16.11.2013 21:06, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, when viewing photos and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/17586 http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/17634 and other photos of the two groups, the right column displays only photos from the group al. Type hidden photos.

16.11.2013 20:08, Peter Khramov:

Really nobody knows? All because of the Russian Federation, although the Far East ...

16.11.2013 19:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, thanks, I always try to check Vitaly, can miss something, he has lot of good photos, but IDing himself he happens to be wrong. :)

16.11.2013 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elophila nymphaeata / Vitaly Gumenuk Nymphula nitidulata / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2013 19:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Elophila nymphaeata / Vitaly Gumenuk Nymphula nitidulata / Irina Nikulina.

16.11.2013 19:46, Irina Nikulina:

And this is also likely to be Nymphula nitidulata.

16.11.2013 19:46, Irina Nikulina:

Isn't this Nymphula nitidulata?

16.11.2013 16:42, Shamil Murtazin:

? Lacanobia oleracea
... L. suasa

16.11.2013 16:42, Shamil Murtazin:

? Lacanobia oleracea
... L. suasa

16.11.2013 16:42, Shamil Murtazin:

? Lacanobia oleracea
... L. suasa

16.11.2013 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Great idea, not valid for me though: I don't examine males in this projection, just get along with only visual diagnosis.
Whatsoever, could be real thing, but only for collected specimens as you can't collect genitalia from alive butterfly :)

16.11.2013 15:12, Igor Sakhno:

This could be taken as a video, theoretically. But I wasn't ready for they behaved like that and it happened quite quickly.

16.11.2013 15:12, Yuri Semejkin:

So if anyone wanted to collect pupa, where should he/she look for one? You claim that no matter on which plant pupa is fixed, this is not biology. Thus you admit that larvae of any species which pupate in plants crawl wherever they could and get fixed in anything occasional, any plant instead of choosing some group of plants or just one, and they don't avoid some plants in which they refuse to pupate in nature?

16.11.2013 15:03, Igor Sakhno:

To add aforesaid, if someone added genitalia pics of species with similar exterior (don't consider machaon), would be great. Just an addition to ideas.

16.11.2013 14:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr, so the info isn't complete then. Some sources, for one, say: "Pupae of overwintering generation are fixed underside of Philadelphus tenuifolius leaves and then fall down together with these leaves on the soil where they overwinter in the leaf litter. Institute of Biology and Soil Science FEB RAS, TINRO-centre, Phoenix Fund, 2011." Isn't this biology? This seems to be wrong though.

16.11.2013 14:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's some Vlad's lapse. Laothoe populi is not a variant at all, neither by exterior, nor by location, especially the latter.

16.11.2013 14:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Laothoe populi / Vlad Proklov Laothoe amurensis / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.11.2013 14:20, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Deltote nemorum / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

16.11.2013 14:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, just a remark, in biological sense it does matter on which pupae feeds (plants) as well as where it's located (fixed, cocoon, in litter, soil), but doesn't do on which it rests.

16.11.2013 14:11, Igor Sakhno:

Looks similar to Siproeta stelenes

16.11.2013 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeah, looks similar to Numenes disparilis, anyway such pics should be separated somehow, no chance to ID the very species, nothing to rely upon, so it's to be stuck in uncertain for ever.

16.11.2013 13:49, Igor Sakhno:

Well why, can be some Lymantria.

16.11.2013 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, as for P. machaon, I can take plenty shots in Meschera next summer. Even two generations :) It's flooded here with it, eye pain...
To this pic, no similar here and hardly to be. So I added it. Any documentation matters.

16.11.2013 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Some species on the website are indeed overillustrated, for one, the same P. machaon. In this case such pics with ichneumon may really annoy. Neverthereless, I'd like to say again that this overillustration state is temporary and has to do with yet undone maps. As they get done, there will be A) a subsection with additional images for every species where all secondary pics would be moved, for one, those which illustrate spots where the species is mapped) and B) there will be additional sorting of photos to remove those not illustrating anything new, even spots on the map. Then there should no inconvenience with overillustration thing. Till then you're free to upload such ichneumon photos, only they should be together in one pic, not individual pics of parasites.

16.11.2013 12:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Here we already have plenty of pupae. This is distinguished for it was shot in late autumn in nature, wasn't raised of a larva. Pupa poses at about 2m height, supposedly in Philadelphus tenuifolius (no leaves). No visible damage on it I noticed which is uncommon to see, most pupae have some damage.
Still unclear why pupae are spotted in Philadelphus tenuifolius. Haven't seen any pupa in Philadelphus tenuifolius as against to anything else. No links given yet with image of pupae in Philadelphus tenuifolius or some reference.

16.11.2013 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marpesia chiron / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.11.2013 9:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio cresphontes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.11.2013 9:58, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio cresphontes

16.11.2013 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siproeta stelenes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.11.2013 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siproeta stelenes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

16.11.2013 9:53, Alex Dumchus:

Siproeta stelenes

16.11.2013 9:52, Alex Dumchus:

Siproeta stelenes

16.11.2013 9:04, Yuri Semejkin:

"Entomology is the scientific study of insects which examines the thing in its full." nothing to add, well said. What we're all to aspire to.
Descriptions should be definitely added with such info, no matter that there are no references yet as to this very species of parasite. Personal observation is of more weight as it's authentic and proved (with an image).

16.11.2013 8:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marpesia petreus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

16.11.2013 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, thanks. Golden words. The very notion "entomology" includes not only fancy pics of "amazing wings": it's the scientific study of insects which examines the thing in its full. I can add the description only through the field "Additional info of the larval stage", if folks don't mind. Anyway, it's just my personal observation, I never read anywhere of the infestation of this species by this very parasite. However it's not a single case in my observations: an adult, visibly healthy P. machaon larva collected in nature, raised to the pupa stage which looks also fine and healthy and eventually it's emersed with Trogus lapidator instead of an imago. Common thing, may I assume.

16.11.2013 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

16.11.2013 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female laying eggs. Nice shot.

16.11.2013 2:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Please let's not limit ourselves with plain cycle from egg-laying to imago. This is a biological website, so let's show the biology in full (which can be shown by pics). Lepidoptera parasites are to know too, this info might be useful for experts anyway.
Just don't upload individual sawflies or ichneumons as it's still to be proved that it's very them who invade larvae and then pupae. Let's consider such cases like Vasily's here, photos that present both, parasite and its victim. There will be hardly lots of such pics, and no need in many. Enough 1—2 per 1 species. Besides, species descriptions can be added with a list of parasite(s).

16.11.2013 2:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Please resolve my doubts, it looks far from Hyles nicaea sheljuzkoi whilst you may have Hyles euphorbiae, isn't common species?

16.11.2013 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

15.11.2013 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Besides, this parasite is very specific, specialized on Papilio alexanor which here substituted with P. machaon, it seems :)
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CF%E0%F0%F3%F1%ED%E8%EA_%C0%EB%E5%EA%F1%E0%ED%EE%F0 (read the section "Endoparasitism"). That's why I put this pic and the guilty is defined. Any info about butterfly matters, doesn't?

15.11.2013 23:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

I see no problem, many websites include parasites and the latter are shown in the pages of their "victims" they ate :)

15.11.2013 22:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Seems this "technical" question has to be put on the agenda.

15.11.2013 22:49, Shamil Murtazin:

Agree. Very interesting.
Still again we're playing the same song about the website mission. Namely, lepidoptera.
Here this photo shows another insect, or their interconnection. Please don't get me wrong, it we leave it here, then we should draw the borderline, nominal at least; we should also think of where to put this pic which can be hardly moved to lepidoptera as it illustrates parasite. Here only exuviae left (thanks for the new term learnt). Thus this image couldn't anyway be shown in some page of lepidoptera species. Question then, where it actually can be shown? As it should be done eventually somewhere.
Probably would be good to consider some additional fields for some data of the kind, no matter, texts, photos or even video )
But... this feature may further evolves separate parasite taxonomy, gallery and other relative things... =)
Such an easy solution may gradually entail all these. Sorry for such wide mindstream ;)

15.11.2013 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please don't, maybe the lepidoptera species will be IDed later (this photo in a group)? Would be great to ID the very parasite thing...
With the flow, I've added today my "machaon": http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/25021
Interesting, I think :)

15.11.2013 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Delete it?

15.11.2013 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is not a sawfly, rather hymenopterous of another group, some parasitoid wasp. These are parasite on insects, whilst sawflies are vegetarians :)

15.11.2013 15:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Broken cocoon, with remains of larva or sawfly?

15.11.2013 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Yponomeuta cagnagella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

15.11.2013 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then let it stays there so far :)

15.11.2013 14:09, Andrey Ponomarev:

Serious doubts about food plant. This is despite likely to be Euonymus verrucosus, not europaeus, thus larvae can be of Yponomeuta cagnagella. Methink.

15.11.2013 13:41, Yuri Semejkin:

I added pupae of another species http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/25020

15.11.2013 13:28, Irina Nikulina:

Me neither can find anywhere jankowskii pupa. Still there are pics of fugax, pupa was identified in nature by qualified entomologist. These two species can seem to be distinguished by photo.

15.11.2013 13:23, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, If I was so (totally) sure, wouldn't put it to uncertain. ID in comments is always to be debated. My thoughts originated from food plant. Euonymus europaeus is a food plant of Yponomeuta cagnagella, Y. irrorellus, Y. Plumbellus, Ypsolopha mucronella, Synanthedon stomoxiformis. Synanthedon stomoxiformis. As for larvae, most probable are Y. cagnagella (http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=2423.1
http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?id=4474 ) and Y. irrorellus, though irrorellus isn't distributed in 8th region (see the shot location). Please correct me if I'm wrong.

15.11.2013 13:14, Peter Khramov:

Andrey, definitely there is sense in uploading pics of larva different ages in case if A) you can; and B) larvae of different ages don't vary only in size.

15.11.2013 13:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey, thanks. Definitely plumbella.

15.11.2013 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Yponomeuta malinellus / Vitaly Gumenuk Yponomeuta plumbella / Andrey Ponomarev.

15.11.2013 12:11, Andrey Ponomarev:

I think this is Yponomeuta plumbella.
Similar angle shot is here, to compare: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepidopterenforum/lepiwiki/pics/heidrun_melzer2/plumbella_yponomeuta_Leipzig_2009_f.jpg

15.11.2013 11:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Panthea coenobita / Vitaly Gumenuk Acronicta rumicis / Andrey Ponomarev.

15.11.2013 11:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Panthea coenobita / Vitaly Gumenuk Acronicta rumicis / Andrey Ponomarev.

15.11.2013 11:33, Andrey Ponomarev:

Not sure if there is any sense to show the full cycle of larva development or just the last age would be enough?

15.11.2013 11:29, Andrey Ponomarev:

Why are here for anyway Acronicta rumicis larvae?

15.11.2013 11:24, Yuri Semejkin:

R.jankowskii is distributed in Primorye, I confirm. As for this pupa, I got it many times, no win. This one, in the pic, is at home too, picked up again, no positive belief it will work out after two fails.

15.11.2013 9:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Such certainty in a specimen of such tough gender? This moth is catalogued, for one Yponomeuta cagnagella

15.11.2013 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's only one in Far East as most likely (can be moved back to uncertain). The thing is that there are plenty of images of R. fugax pupae on the web whilst can't find pic of R.jankowskii to compare. Best would be to pick up pupae and try to get imagoes to resolve all doubts. In most cases no precise ID possible by pupae.

15.11.2013 1:08, Peter Khramov:

All fixed, thanks for the tip. Apparently, somewhere there was a bug in the prog that machine zaleplivala these things to some taxa. Software is no longer sought, hands only ...
Although. And the truth is, you can simply check compliance. Yes, I'll try all automatic check and write here about the results.

15.11.2013 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Similarly - at Odontosia arnoldiana Kardakoff, 1928. And on Nericoides dawidi Oberthur, 1881. And Nericoides leechi Staudinger, 1892. And Peridea jankowskii Oberthur, 1879. And Furcula infumata Staudinger, 1887 plus Furcula lanigera Butler, 1877.

15.11.2013 0:26, Irina Nikulina:

Yponomeuta cagnagella

15.11.2013 0:11, Peter Khramov:

In this issue we write about the kinds of messages and other taxa that are not in the database, or you did not find them there, including synonym. Accordingly, other users and moderators look, is it true taxon (or synonym) in the no moderators, if necessary, he added.I'll start: the citizens what Gastropacha watanaebi Okano, 1966 (lives in the Far East)? They have to hide under some tricky synonymous (is anyone really looking for, not found) or did not? If not, please add.

14.11.2013 23:58, Peter Khramov:

The main search with the "Search" button now works better than before, yet not as good as the autosuggestion thing which currently shows also the author name and description year.

14.11.2013 23:53, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, please explain what you meant by "it's only one in Far East"? What about Rhodinia jankowskii? Surely distributed in Primorye. Can anyone give links to its pupae, maybe similar to fugax diana?

14.11.2013 23:34, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Two funny pictures, family Yponomeutidae:
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/2318
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/2328

Maybe you can arrange some sort of automatic check these things? For illustrations are taken from the gallery, known for their kind / genus / family, etc.

14.11.2013 23:17, Irina Nikulina:

http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/2351 very funny, "Saturn")

14.11.2013 22:44, Peter Khramov:

As for the tape - it is convenient, when every day you come to the site, I, too, was she indicated in tabs. But when once or twice a week, and even more rarely, then a completely different kettle of fish.

14.11.2013 22:22, Irina Nikulina:

I agree, Special sections upstairs asks to "Tape recent comments" also usually start, so really convenient.

14.11.2013 21:07, Shamil Murtazin:

I read all the comments tape. It is more convenient, the event takes place not so much.

14.11.2013 13:20, Peter Khramov:

But do not drag any Subscriptions, open discussions and other service sections in the upper part of the community? Ie put them on the commentaries to the species fotam and so on. Who thinks that?

14.11.2013 13:09, Peter Khramov:

Of the major software updates online program is expected to maintain collections of butterflies, sharing, etc. prostanovka plus points on Google Maps. The rest of the updates will address content - will be dealt with the old text data on the new system, the new poured in substantial quantities may take place another major update for taxa.Well, of course dorazberemsya with fotami and remove them after Gugl.Karty earn.
If someone sees that the site lacks something essential, and that something is not in the plans listed above, please write to this topic. Discuss and, if it is really necessary, implement.

14.11.2013 3:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum semifasciata / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.11.2013 3:05, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum semifasciata / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

14.11.2013 1:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Evgeny Karolinsky, what do you say?

14.11.2013 1:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Me too, I'm nearly sure this is right, however the angle is not good to see in details if the pattern is specific. We'll feel easier leaving like this :)

14.11.2013 1:34, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, I checked all 8 possible Apotomis before supposing Hedya ochroleucana. Had more doubts about Metendothenia atropunctana, checked it in different sources. Ochroleucana has this very specific in colour and shape light spot (not sure how to name it right) http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Metendothenia_Atropunctana
http://www.lepiforum. ochroleucana,de/lepiwiki.pl?Hedya_Ochroleucana. You know better, let it stays in uncertain so far.

14.11.2013 1:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya ochroleucana / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.11.2013 1:01, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, different species, both shot in one location, one week between.

14.11.2013 0:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hedya ochroleucana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

14.11.2013 0:46, Peter Khramov:

Anything new on this?...

14.11.2013 0:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Is this photo of another species? Or #24950 is the same specimen?

14.11.2013 0:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tough to move with such angle. Maybe something different, say, Metendothenia atropunctana or some Apotomis?

14.11.2013 0:28, Irina Nikulina:

Hedya ochroleucana?

14.11.2013 0:28, Irina Nikulina:

Hedya ochroleucana?

13.11.2013 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Wow, how fast non-illustrated species are now getting illustrations! Will reach 4,000 soon at such a speed.

12.11.2013 23:04, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Eressa confinis?

12.11.2013 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lymantria fumida / Yuri Semejkin Lymantria dispar / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.11.2013 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lymantria fumida / Yuri Semejkin Lymantria dispar / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.11.2013 21:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lymantria fumida / Yuri Semejkin Lymantria dispar / Alexandr Zhakov.

12.11.2013 21:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, many thanks, larvae indeed look different, moving it.

12.11.2013 21:09, Irina Nikulina:

This pic of L. fumida larvae may be useful: http://aoki2.si.gunma-u.ac.jp/youtyuu/HTMLs/haraakamaimai.html. Back then we had a talk with local entomologists about Lymantria species in Primorye, 3 species were mentioned as most common, namely Lymantria dispar, Lymantria monacha and Lymantria mathura, and for Primorye there was Lymantria dispar asiatica. Neither heard anything of fumida in Russia. Maybe, Vladimir Stepanovich doubted too if consider "_quest" as "question".

12.11.2013 20:46, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, I removed both and there is a suspicion meet: -)

12.11.2013 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

12.11.2013 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Turns out we'll move it to Lymantria dispar anyway. L. fumida is distributed in Japan, Korea and China, no info about Russia. Waiting for disproof.

12.11.2013 13:20, Irina Nikulina:

Ure probably hatched Choristoneura diversana, it dwells in Primorye. http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Choristoneura_Diversana.

12.11.2013 12:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, you're nothing for me delete the photo, there is in fact a couple of them, the upper side and lower, you remove the bottom, and maybe it is species-specific? race very difficult, but not hopeless, and the butterfly can be determined for certain, stand some degree of accuracy. Return please, I'll try to dig. :)

12.11.2013 11:13, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, now just barely goes removal ph since forward povleniya bindings to Google Maps and separation of photons at the primary and secondary (which are for illustrative purposes only points). How it will be - a lot ph will be transferred to Perm. section, and I think about 300-500 pieces altogether removed.This is the picture you deleted right now, it really did not see, but there is no definition, and obviously will not be.

12.11.2013 10:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Ira! Didn't I dig it out... Suggested filipjevi just roughly. Wanted more opinions if there would be any. So pitched that in the morning, before work.

12.11.2013 8:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cigaritis lohita / Confidently identified / Dmitry Borisyuk.

12.11.2013 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pupa Larva.

12.11.2013 6:24, Evgeny Komarov:

And about the "requirements" - painfully, we are liberal. Well, can not be placed online photo absolutely no quality. Here is an example http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23978. What you can see here, TB "kind of undefined"

12.11.2013 6:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Approving Dmitry.

12.11.2013 2:51, Dmitry Borisyuk:

I see that the larva is crawling to pupate, still too early to name it "pupa"... IMHO... yet

12.11.2013 2:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina filipjevi / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.11.2013 2:09, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Why Chilades galba couldn't really fly from the Caucasus to Kharkov?

12.11.2013 2:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Leucoma salicis / Confidently identified / Dina Rogatnykh Leucoma candida / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.11.2013 2:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Candida Leucoma candida.

12.11.2013 2:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Leucoma salicis / Confidently identified / Dina Rogatnykh Candida / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

12.11.2013 1:55, Irina Nikulina:

Yury, why without ID? Doubting between Celastrina oreas and Celastrina filipjevi? This is filipjevi, as I see. Proof — clear and outlined black patter on the underside whilst oreas has less distinct and similar to Celastrina ladonides. There is V. V. Dubatolov's publication "Maslowskia oreas in Russia" (in the works of Ussuriisk Nature Reserve, the Institute of Biology and Soil Science, FEB RAS), where it said that oreas is similar to Celastrina ladonides but not filipjevi.
This distinction is well seen here http://www.lycaenidae.gmxhome.de/Lycaenopsis/Celastrina/celastrina-index.htm where you can see all three species.

12.11.2013 0:42, Irina Nikulina:

Leucoma salicis or Leucoma candida? Explaining. I checked at Synev, L.salicis has ? mark in #36, 37, 40. Whilst L. candida is surely distributed in these regions. Looking for the answer I spotted this recent thread http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t180517-400.htm, opinions provided:
сajarc: "To my mind, Leucoma candida is more often in Primorye south than Leucoma salicis".
chebur: "... they can be distinguished by exterior, when put them on something dark. L. salicis has rarer wing scales and it will be transparent on the dark background. L. candida has denser white layer of wing scales".
V.V. Dubatolov's word, at last: "As for Leucoma salicis, yes, it is in Priamurye and Primorye. We either have it from those places in our museum. I personally collected both Leucoma species in Daursky, Zeisky and Bolshetsekhirsky Nature Reserves. L. salicis flies out earlier, at the end of June, July. L. candida is later, flight period is July—end of August. Males are very well distinguished by genitalia which can be seen even in alive specimens. They also can be good discerned by the color of the antennae scales. I first heard about L. salicis in Primorye south from Chistyakov in the mid 80s".
Thus, both species are distributed in Primorye and Priamurye. L.salicis is illustrated with photos from 36th region. Anyway, #3365 and #3364 might be the very candida (pics taken August 10 and 14)? Is the species on those pics identified right?

11.11.2013 23:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

11.11.2013 23:14, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Still maybe female? The head is red...

11.11.2013 23:09, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Very cautious version: Cigaritis lohita male?

11.11.2013 22:00, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, quickly!)

11.11.2013 21:58, Peter Khramov:

Yes, now also I noticed this matter and corrected ...

11.11.2013 21:57, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, alas, got out. Tested on a favorite). So, if you open a photo within the group (eg, http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21768), then everything is in order, the column became compact. everything opens. But if you open any other, does not belong to the group, then empty all the right (. On the other. Species not yet checked.

11.11.2013 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Done. Note Do not get out any glitches that all norms.

11.11.2013 21:27, Irina Nikulina:

I also do not just occur to you that this overlap only overloads the right column. The main thing is that when you press "all photos of this type in a large amount on the same page" opens all the photos, and in a small enough to show a photo of the individual once without duplicating their own in the "Other photos of this species." The right column will be smaller.While I do not see that this will lose.

11.11.2013 15:27, Peter Khramov:

If there is a mind that shows another picture from the same individual, and the list of other kinds of phot photo from the same individual should not exist - yes, the proposal itself is quite adequate. Let's listen to the people who then thinks about it. Technically, it is quite a ...

11.11.2013 15:23, Shamil Murtazin:

The issue of such a plan.
When you select a photo, and it is in the group of "one individual" right in the panels have the appropriate group of photos.
However, in the "Other photos of this species' present the same picture.If a species is illustrated 6 photo, 5 of which are grouped as a photo of one individual, we get two almost equal groups in the right pane.
Maybe a photo of this type of clean up of the common species in the right fot the panels?
(clearly explained? =)

11.11.2013 13:29, Peter Khramov:

Realized corrected, thank you.

11.11.2013 13:27, Peter Khramov:

According to the author itself, the exact date is unknown. The shooting has probably taken place not July 29th but June 25th. Extra photo is deleted.

11.11.2013 13:25, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

/ Caloptilia jurateae / Andrey Ponomarev.

11.11.2013 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Caloptilia jurateae / Andrey Ponomarev.

11.11.2013 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will be right now :)

11.11.2013 12:52, Andrey Ponomarev:

Caloptilia jurateae, not in the list

11.11.2013 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cyclophora pendularia / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

11.11.2013 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cyclophora pendularia / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

11.11.2013 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Dirphia avia / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.11.2013 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, moving.

11.11.2013 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrey, any suggestions?

11.11.2013 12:38, Evgeny Komarov:

I catch more: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/611

11.11.2013 12:10, Andrey Ponomarev:

Not Cyclophora pendularia

11.11.2013 12:09, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is not Cyclophora pendularia larva

11.11.2013 12:09, Evgeny Komarov:

There, this is D. avia male. Here thery're as two beans: http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Saturniidae/Hemileucinae/Autres/Guy%2001632-s3.jpg

11.11.2013 3:32, Peter Khramov:

Ok, will ask Vlad what was actually there...

11.11.2013 3:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

I did it authomatically, here are females, there are males, and who are here? imagos. :) The next neighbour pic features lots of males, was going to move it too, yet haven't. I think it's right as it's impossible to see clearly gender in this photo, whilst would be better to comment the very photo with a remark that this is a male flight (of course, if it's indeed males as species females do flight as good, antennae don't hinder :).

11.11.2013 2:32, Peter Khramov:

This was a male flight, if I got it right. Why moved back to imago?

11.11.2013 2:25, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Male.

11.11.2013 2:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Male Imago.

11.11.2013 1:50, Dmitry Borisyuk:

There's something wrong with this pic. Look closely at #22455 pic of the same author. Evidently it's the same specimen, on the same leaf. Whilst the date differs.

11.11.2013 1:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

11.11.2013 1:14, Peter Khramov:

Thank corrected.

11.11.2013 1:06, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Here's another:
Rhode Phyllosphingia (http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/18997) - instead of copper-butterfly hawk.

11.11.2013 0:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male & female.

11.11.2013 0:32, Peter Khramov:

Earlier when searching a species synonym name, one could find that the autosuggestion worked by typing species full name and only that way, so as if you used just either, second part of the species name, no synonym name autosuggested then, for one, search by "urticata" only didn't autosuggest synonym Anania hortulata whilst one by the full name Eurrhypara urticata actually did. So now you may get its synonym by only "urticata" part.
P. S. To add, the latest upgrades are all about the autosuggestion, the main search ("Search" button) is still way slower and less functional. That is sure to be fixed, however my advice is make as much use of the autosuggestion thing which works noticeably faster and handier. Btw, for those who prefer keyboard to others and execute search request by pressing the "Enter" button, please be informed that you as well may select out of autosuggested names by using keyboard arrows and the "Enter" button.

10.11.2013 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura vinula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.11.2013 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura vinula / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

10.11.2013 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips podana / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

10.11.2013 22:12, Irina Nikulina:

Archips podana?

10.11.2013 21:34, Peter Khramov:

Or they just didn't spread out properly after the emersion...

10.11.2013 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Citheronia bellavista / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2013 20:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Citheronia bellavista (Draudt, 1930) 85% sure. Seems that the author cut the wing ends of the poor thing for a nicer look, didn't like they were worn-out or what.

10.11.2013 20:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Reasonable!

10.11.2013 20:21, Evgeny Komarov:

This is most likely of everything I managed to dig out, still never saw avia with such pattern. There are two dozens of species, only third is on the web.

10.11.2013 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Even gender is good here :) My try: Dirphia avia (Stoll, 1780)?

10.11.2013 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So far moved to uncertain, time will say.

10.11.2013 17:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Automeris amanda / Tentatively identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.11.2013 12:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Niphanda fusca / Confidently identified / Dmitry Borisyuk.

10.11.2013 11:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Dirphia Hübner, [1819], and the species, well...

10.11.2013 11:26, Evgeny Komarov:

I'd say this is Automeris amanda (Schaus, 1900) or something close. Plenty of ssp. also there!

10.11.2013 9:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Eugene, I have nothing protiv.Deystvitelno, at dawn, when it dawns, -for shooting with fast shutter speeds without a tripod can not do, and long too. But I'm not about that. Speaking of the early morning, I mean the time when it was light, but the sun has not yet got out of the horizon or raise low. In the summer, in time, it is somewhere between 6 am to 10 am.Illumination is enough, especially in open areas and shooting with fast shutter speeds can already be. With shutter speeds the wind is no longer an obstacle, the movement of a butterfly, too, is not a hindrance, objects do not have a tripod and smazhutsya or not, it does not affect the quality of shooting.I just wanted to say, and there is no need to constantly carry a tripod, if you are going to shoot in the gloom.

10.11.2013 8:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri, I'm talking about a stand in nature, if you shoot at dawn or dusk. There's no short exposures can not be, and hold when shooting handheld shutter speeds slower than 1/10 impossible. And if the SLR, and with a macro lens ... all the pictures with shutter speeds slower than 1/100 to "shake", ie SmAZ in varying degrees.You can, of course, "bully" ISO and shutter speed to shorten the expense of ... But then pay off noise that will ruin the photo. Therefore, always shoot at the minimum ISO. Even advanced SLR "noise" in the more than 600 ISO, and so compact and cheap SLR noise at ISO 200. a As an example, here is the "Photo # 2997: Polyommatus coelestina" shot with an exposure of 1/3 seconds.

10.11.2013 2:03, Yuri Semejkin:

I prefer possible shooting in cloudy weather or in the early morning. At this time, light is more even, glare-free inherent bright sunny day. When shooting in sunny weather, the flash of course necessary, but in some cases you can simply create a shadow, and remove both the flash and without it, and then compare to the computer.As for the stand-nation removes and eliminates bad, mainly telephoto. But then again, butterflies in my small they did not withdraw, and then look in the scene where she is.
When shooting zoom forced to shoot from 1-5 cm and staff there is clearly an obstacle (the object and can fly).Frankly, I do not understand the need to use a tripod when shooting dynamic obёktov not see the sense in it. It is simple enough to use a fast shutter speed and the result will be the same as when shooting with a tripod static objects. In other words, imagine that shooting avtomotogonki.Will use a slower shutter speed, an object greased. When using short vyderzhki- stops momentarily.

10.11.2013 1:53, Dmitry Borisyuk:

I'm for this is Niphanda fusca (Bremer & Grey, 1853).

10.11.2013 0:36, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, what a joke, Eugene wrote about the early morning and evening, there is a half hour, you can sit in front of my grandmother, and she will not get anywhere. And sometimes there are situations like this afternoon.Another thing is that if the goal - to capture the maximum number of species with decent quality and not make two images, but with a more than decent, the tripod in the field in most cases, will only interfere.

10.11.2013 0:26, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Eugene, about nature photography with a tripod probably a joke? Because the object fly away :)

09.11.2013 19:51, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rothschildia lebeau / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

09.11.2013 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, if a person has a tripod, and he knows what the aperture priority, he already knows enough to take pictures of above average quality of the site: -) There is no longer a problem with 3+ or 4 points to jump to 5, and with at least 2-3 to 3.5-4: -)

09.11.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov:

Right, Vlad's confirmed.

09.11.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.11.2013 19:32, Evgeny Komarov:

Shooting uniquely collectible copies made without the flash - do not need it here in any way! We need a tripod, the camera aperture priority mode, and the minimum possible for her to ISO. Besides (shooting SLR) set a preliminary lifting and lowering of the mirror with a timer (handshake eliminates long exposure).Shooting in nature - the flash is almost always required, and the lens is needed - otherwise we will have failures in shadows and highlights. On the bright sun flare again allows you to remove excess contrasts. Exception - shooting in the early morning or evening.Here again, shooting with a tripod in aperture priority mode with all the nuances described shooting collectible copies (of course with no wind - exposure can be more than a second).

09.11.2013 16:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Rothschildia lebeau (Guérin-Méneville, 1868), as far as I can see.

09.11.2013 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

There's only one similar in this gender, Symphlebia haenkei, but still rather unlike.

09.11.2013 15:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Symphlebia fulminans / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

09.11.2013 15:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Very close to this one: Symphlebia fulminans (Rothschild, 1910) - http://szmn.sbras.ru/Lepidop/images/Symphlebia_fulminans.htm

09.11.2013 15:01, Peter Khramov:

People! I have to ask you. Let's take a little more attentive to what and how we write on the site - in the comments and with the addition of information on the species. God is with him, with a long dash (-) instead of a hyphen (-), it should replace the program itself, and many users even may not know where this thing takes a dash on the keyboard.But now online and can often be found absolutely curves cases. Please note:
If you put a dash, do not forget that on both sides of it are added to the gaps. Exception - some cases ranges. For example, 20-50 (ie, from twenty to fifty).So, we write "Exclusion - some cases of ranges" or "exception - some cases of ranges" (which the program itself after you tend to do this function over time), but not the "exception, some cases of ranges," not "some Isklyuchenie- Cases range "and" Exclusion ranges are certain cases. "
And vice versa.Quotes and other semicolons presses we left, followed by a space. Ie namely, "to the left, and behind them" and not "left behind them", not "left behind them" and not "left behind them."Again, I do not insist that you put "Christmas trees" put ordinary programmers' "pair of apostrophes," let the program itself will be replaced, but attentive in these situations to gaps: it is important for a program so that it can produce adequate AutoCorrect, and your text for perception in general.
Besides that.Capital letters are not just invented. And not to yell. In order to faster / easier to read and find in the text of the appropriate sections. So please do not be lazy to put them where necessary (for example, at the beginning of sentences) and not get involved in putting them where there is no need. Similarly, about exclamation marks.Here this exclamation: "Kind defined wrong!". That's exclamation, turning into a pig squeal "type defined incorrectly !!". That is the cry of the dying: "View !!! defined incorrectly". And this is a PR, or stress is not the word, bordering on rudeness and humiliation of the interlocutor: "VIEW defined incorrectly". In addition, this deformity that interferes with reading.Of course, in some cases, a word or a phrase, and really need to highlight. To do this, you can now use a bold font (thermonuclear selection), italics (less noticeable separation) or to designate text as a subtitle (if it really is subtitled, rather than when you just wanted to "do more bukovki").And for other literacy, let's watch a little more. Well, it's not so necessary to the teachers in the school had something to do, and for people to read your writing was easier and more enjoyable.Summary: The texts to get acquainted more convenient and faster, the impression of the site is more favorable, and reliability of the resource - more.

09.11.2013 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I did.

09.11.2013 14:17, Peter Khramov:

No need to delete anything. Tough angle is a tough angle. Ok, where it's all blur in the photo or only half of the wing seen, or an eye and an antenna. Not in this case though.

09.11.2013 13:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Gandaritis pyraliata, I know it, I've examined this one for long, poor angle, sharpness, but anyway the colour is different and there is no root shade costally to the wing margin. This species for this moth is more appropriate here :)

09.11.2013 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Fixed. Now no bugs with different pics by other authors.

09.11.2013 13:40, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, are you sure this is not G. pyraliata?

09.11.2013 13:39, Dmitry Borisyuk:

I won't anymore (c). Would delete the pic, sadly am not able already.

09.11.2013 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

09.11.2013 12:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Gandaritis pyraliata / Vlad Proklov Eulithis mellinata / Sergei Kotov.

09.11.2013 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Selenia dentaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

09.11.2013 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa mandarina Orgyia recens.

09.11.2013 12:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aethes hartmanniana Aethes triangulana.

09.11.2013 12:10, Andrey Ponomarev:

How come Orgyia recens came here?
This is bug

09.11.2013 12:02, Andrey Ponomarev:

This one should be moved to Aethes triangulana

09.11.2013 11:42, Irina Nikulina:

Selenia dentaria ?

09.11.2013 2:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila straminella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

09.11.2013 2:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

The angle is outstanding, couldn't have been less informative.

09.11.2013 0:46, Peter Khramov:

Whoah, what a diaphragm.

09.11.2013 0:44, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

08.11.2013 20:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Saturnia (Schrank, 1802) → Saturnia1 caecigena transcaucasica (Schrank, 1802).

08.11.2013 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eudarcia bilineata (Barnes & McDunnough, 1916) → Eudarcia bilineata1 (Barnes & McDunnough, 1916).

08.11.2013 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eumedonia bilineata (Barnes & McDunnough, 1916) → Eudarcia (Abchagleris) bilineata (Barnes & McDunnough, 1916).

08.11.2013 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Acherontia bilineata (Barnes & McDunnough, 1916) → Eumedonia bilineata (Barnes & McDunnough, 1916).

08.11.2013 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Abablemma bilineata (Barnes & McDunnough, 1916) → Acherontia bilineata (Barnes & McDunnough, 1916).

08.11.2013 19:50, Irina Nikulina:

Abablemma bilineata and Hyles lineata were merged.

08.11.2013 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Abablemma bilineata and Candida salicis were merged.

08.11.2013 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aphantopus palawana Schultze, 1925 → Abablemma palawana Schultze, 1925.

08.11.2013 18:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ethmia palawana Schultze, 1925 → Aphantopus palawana Schultze, 1925.

08.11.2013 17:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aphantopus hyperantus and Banisia fenestrifera were merged.

08.11.2013 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Boeberia aethiops (Esper, 1777) → Erebia aethiops (Esper, 1777).

07.11.2013 19:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989@ удален из синонимов

07.11.2013 19:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989, Phalaena pavonia Linnaeus, 1758, minor Linnaeus, 1758@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 18:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989, Phalaena pavonia Linnaeus, 1758, minor Linnaeus, 1758@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 16:33, Irina Nikulina:

@Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989, Phalaena pavonia Linnaeus, 1758@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989 has been deleted from the synonyms

07.11.2013 15:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989, Phalaena pavonia Linnaeus, 1758, minor Linnaeus, 1758@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989, Phalaena pavonia Linnaeus, 1758, minor Linnaeus, 1758@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989, Phalaena pavonia Linnaeus, 1758@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides Sumiyoshi, 1989@ удален из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Phalaena pavonia, minor@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Phalaena pavonia, minor@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Phalaena pavonia@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides@ удален из синонимов

07.11.2013 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 14:44, Irina Nikulina:

@Ornithoptera titanoides@ удален из синонимов

07.11.2013 14:42, Irina Nikulina:

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus,@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 14:42, Irina Nikulina:

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus,@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 14:37, Irina Nikulina:

@Ornithoptera titanoides@ удален из синонимов

07.11.2013 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@sOrnithoptera titanoides,sTroides pegasus,@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@sOrnithoptera titanoides,@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides,Troides pegasus,@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 12:26, Irina Nikulina:

@Ornithoptera titanoides,Troides pegasus,@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides,@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoidesTroides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 8:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@Ornithoptera titanoidesTroides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 8:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@Ornithoptera titanoidesTroides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoidesTroides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 7:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@rnithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 7:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 2:46, Peter Khramov:

@ Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 1:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

@thoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 1:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@nithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 1:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 1:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 1:02, Igor Sakhno:

@m>Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 0:03, Irina Nikulina:

@Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

07.11.2013 0:03, Irina Nikulina:

удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 19:18, Peter Khramov:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 17:36, Peter Khramov:

@em>Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 17:27, Yuri Semejkin:

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@ Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 17:02, Yuri Semejkin:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:58, Peter Khramov:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:54, Peter Khramov:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:53, Yuri Semejkin:

@em>Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:52, Peter Khramov:

@ Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@optera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:50, Yuri Semejkin:

@nithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@m>Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@, @ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@, @ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@, @ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

@, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:13, Yuri Semejkin:

@Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@m>Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

@, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 16:00, Yuri Semejkin:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 15:59, Yuri Semejkin:

@, Ornithoptera titanoides@ удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 15:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

m>Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 3:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ornithoptera titanoides удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 3:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus удалены из синонимов

06.11.2013 3:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

, Ornithoptera titanoides, Troides pegasus удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 23:07, Irina Nikulina:

, Ornithoptera titanoides удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 22:53, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

borealis удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 21:49, Irina Nikulina:

borealis удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 20:53, Peter Khramov:

alpina удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 19:03, Peter Khramov:

Bombyx carpini удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 16:48, Svetlana Shchavelina:

lapponica удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

lapponica удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 16:09, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Papilio archideus удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 14:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Gonepteryx rhamni удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 14:09, Irina Nikulina:

Gonepteryx rhamni удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 7:33, Svetlana Shchavelina:

lappmarchica удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 5:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ornithoptera latimarginata удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 4:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio priamus удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:47, Irina Nikulina:

Papilio priamus удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:41, Peter Khramov:

удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:34, Irina Nikulina:

Troides priamus удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:32, Peter Khramov:

удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:31, Irina Nikulina:

Eudia pavonia удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:30, Peter Khramov:

удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:22, Irina Nikulina:

Troides priamus удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:12, Irina Nikulina:

удалены из синонимов

05.11.2013 0:07, Irina Nikulina:

paradoxa удалены из синонимов

04.11.2013 23:53, Peter Khramov:

удалены из синонимов

04.11.2013 23:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

удалены из синонимов

04.11.2013 23:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Saturnia pavonia and Ornithoptera priamus were merged.

04.11.2013 22:30, Peter Khramov:

Saturnia pavonia (Linnaeus, 1757) → Saturnia pavonia (Linnaeus, 1757).

04.11.2013 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Saturnia pavonia (Linnaeus, 1757) → Saturnia pavonia55 (Linnaeus, 1757).

04.11.2013 21:45, : This species is identified correctly.

Zoogeographical regions: Palaearctic → Palaearctic, Nearctic. Wingspan: No formalized data → 30—40 mm. Caterpillar lifespan: May, June, July → August. Over-wintering stage: No formalized data → Imago.

04.11.2013 20:01, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, I have a question / comment for the directory search.
Defining butterflies captured in Primorye, I tried to find the inf., Setting the search parameters 2 - family and region №40 (Primorye). So, "catch" the next (do not know whether it can be my glitches):
1.Family Hesperiidae : the derivation « species with photos » a small size of the preview images displayed 16 species, and if you set the Medium Preview size - the output of all 11 species, while 16 stated the same.
2.Family Papilionidae : a small preview (and "a photo" and all) displays 11 species, with medium - only 8 and in both Option not available, for example, Papilio maackii) (possibly something else, not tested, about Maack just caught in the eye)
3.Family Lycaenidae : a small preview displays 41 species with photos and 69 species in all (as stated), but with a medium preview displays 34 species with photo (announced 41).
4.Family Nymphalidae : at the request of species with photos from small preview displays 68 species (out of 68 applications), but with a medium preview output only 56 species (the kinds with photos in both cases shows not all. For example, there is some lentochnikov- L.moltrechti, L.doerriesi; perlamutrovki Clossiana iphigenia, perhaps even no, do not check for sure)
Other families have not yet touched. It seems to do everything right, look, please. Search Catalog convenient.

04.11.2013 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Well this one should be easier as it's the US, not Columbia.

04.11.2013 19:19, Peter Khramov:

There was a glitch when many subspecies did not appear in the pages of species, although present in the database. Now it is going to fly.

04.11.2013 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Loxura atymnus, common in Thailand

04.11.2013 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Loxura atymnus

04.11.2013 18:42, Peter Khramov:

Done.

04.11.2013 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I erred massively here a year ago. This is L. megacore, and L. cynopsis is absent in Malaysia: http://wildsilkmoth-indonesia.com/malaysia.html
So I moved and now the image should be deleted from here: http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/120322

04.11.2013 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Loepa cynopsis Loepa megacore.

04.11.2013 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Who lives in a hunk?

04.11.2013 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So far moved to uncertain: tough genus.

04.11.2013 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think this is a sawfly's one.

04.11.2013 16:54, Irina Nikulina:

There are only 3 Perigrapha species distributed in Primorye. This is Perigrapha hoenei, http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t133596-3200.html
http://gairoto.cocolog-nifty.com/blog/2012/04/0040perigrapha-.html

04.11.2013 16:39, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Wow... Then just added one more #24416.
They were circling in the same spot, so I thought they were same, now looked more thoroughly, there might be some nuances to expert opinion... Couldn't shoot its upperside, just one thing, they were both bright orange, gleaming flame-like. When they stopped to rest (just for a few seconds), then folded their wings close.

04.11.2013 16:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Weird shape, maybe this cocoon belongs to anything but lepidoptera?

04.11.2013 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Citioica anthonilis / Tentatively identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.11.2013 14:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Copaxa escalantei / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.11.2013 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Copaxa syntheratoides / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.11.2013 14:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Saturnia simla / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

04.11.2013 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cricula trifenestrata / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2013 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

04.11.2013 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved to identified confidently: it's only one in Far East, no variants.

04.11.2013 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhodinia fugax / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

04.11.2013 13:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is Rhodinia fugax (Butler, 1877)? Rhodinia fugax diana Oberthür, 1886? Looks similar. Moving to uncertain, you please name ssp.

04.11.2013 13:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Rhodinia fugax?

04.11.2013 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Looks more Loepa sikkima than Loepa megacore. Usually these two are from there. Only the upperside "eye" is confusing, maybe just variation? What do you think?

04.11.2013 12:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Papilio machaon / Confidently identified / Petr Khramov Not identified.

04.11.2013 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Underside would be great here :)

04.11.2013 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved this to X. crotonis so far. Meh....... Would be great if Alexandr also uploaded the underside of his collection specimen that's already here, could help I think.

04.11.2013 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes crotonis / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.11.2013 9:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.11.2013 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amblyptilia acanthadactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.11.2013 9:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dichrorampha simpliciana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.11.2013 9:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dichrorampha simpliciana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Not identified.

04.11.2013 9:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are two very similar species, Loxura cassiopeia and Loxura atymnus, don't know their distinctions, might better check location, yet haven't found though.

04.11.2013 4:21, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Just by chance, isn't this the same butterfly: http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Malaysia%20-%20Loxura%20cassiopeia.htm
???

04.11.2013 3:27, Peter Khramov:

Although it is not a sample, but the interesting thing. Thank you for the link above.

04.11.2013 3:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Genus is Drasteria, species is to dig out, which can be there, in Kazakhstan.

04.11.2013 2:41, Peter Khramov:

Nah, that's ok. Just wondered.

04.11.2013 2:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! I just copypasted the letter which I read at 7 in the morning (it's already morning here). As for the common names, capital letters and line breaks, It's easy, I think. I mentioned in that letter to Efetov that the larva was previously identified as Illiberis consimilis and that I was not a biologist. I think the reply is meant for an amateur to get it as much clear and line breaks were for purpose not to get confused while reading.
Petr! What's wrong? Maybe better to delete the comment? We anyway got the information.

04.11.2013 1:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one fits most of all Colombian Xylophanes http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/xtyndaru.htm

04.11.2013 1:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes tyndarus / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.11.2013 1:38, Peter Khramov:

I wonder why common names begin with capital letters? Surprise. Also one secondary question, Yury, why so many line breaks?

04.11.2013 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Connected listalku for the section of the forum, in which more than 50 topics. Now you can look through the news of the site from the opening - in 2007. Very entertaining updates were: -)

04.11.2013 1:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Interesting site on the South American revelers http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/SphSouth.htm can make a selection for individual countries.

04.11.2013 1:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Serious doubts this one is larva.

04.11.2013 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

DDDDDD

04.11.2013 1:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

04.11.2013 1:17, Yuri Semejkin:

dfdfdfdfdf

04.11.2013 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Change the data similar to the photo 9644

04.11.2013 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

04.11.2013 1:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polygonia c-album / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

04.11.2013 1:05, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, "kit" is located in the Community under Kurilka about butterflies. Eugene (Caroline), give you the right to transfer too zababahat ph? The people here offered your candidature))

04.11.2013 0:57, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

04.11.2013 0:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO Heliconius sp.

04.11.2013 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Peter, thank you, about what I wanted. It was just about the official theme.

04.11.2013 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yes.

04.11.2013 0:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasilyev can not find the "First aid kit", I found an interesting site for the South American revelers http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/SphSouth.htm transfer it there. and where it is "Aptecha"?

04.11.2013 0:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.11.2013 0:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes acrus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

04.11.2013 0:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very similar, but there are still a couple of similar Xylophanes letiranti and Xylophanes aristor, choose Basil, but I would be inaccurate Xylophanes crotonis. The reverse side is very similar.

03.11.2013 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Miracle, accidentally found Xylophanes acrus
http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/xacrus.htm

03.11.2013 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Protambulyx euryalus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.11.2013 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil 4 of the Colombian species Protambulyx, only suitable Protambulyx euryalus.
http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/SphColombia.htm

03.11.2013 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyles should be.

03.11.2013 21:55, Peter Khramov:

That I messed up. Corrected. Sergey, when you ship foty - indicates the floor in the corresponding list of "Stage of development / floor" and not to be clarified to mean ...

03.11.2013 21:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Male Female.

03.11.2013 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, and this is "The male, female?"

03.11.2013 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I did. And the network is difficult to search. All hope for aglitski version: it can be defined?

03.11.2013 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Guys, exotic larvae are absolute no-show? If anyone knows at least supertaxon, please comment, better that nothing.

03.11.2013 21:17, Peter Khramov:

"when you refresh the page after the transfer type dudbliruetsya comments."
I corrected, and now will not be replicated.

03.11.2013 21:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

03.11.2013 21:17, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

03.11.2013 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

03.11.2013 20:51, Peter Khramov:

Attribution can now be glitches, that is not the phot climbs in Figure supra, but not such that one and the same to get the blasted Fota illustration once for a large number takosonov.
It seems that Eugene still had a view of the system area, and the truth is there are a lot of comments accumulated.Now, by default, will display only the last 25, and to see everything you need to click on the link in the first post.

03.11.2013 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adhemarius gannascus / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.11.2013 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I stand in inaccurate.

03.11.2013 19:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I suppose Protambulyx euryalus Rothschild & Jordan, 1903. Thus, it is necessary to comment.

03.11.2013 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably Xylophanes crotonis (Walker, 1856)? I am waiting for opinions.

03.11.2013 18:05, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, thanks for the comment, corrected. If someone has to catch like that - reported.

03.11.2013 17:23, Dmitry Borisyuk:

I decided to create a theme, so as not to clutter up the page views.
It was found that:
1. The subgenus Bessonia genus Morpho (http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/32322) illustrated poplar revelers.
2. Rod Arhopala (http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23556) and the tribe Arhopalini (Sem. Copper-butterfly) - drawn some nightie.

03.11.2013 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Some comments from the neighbors and photographs are cut, because I do not carry anything constructive, and the views of each other all the parties reviewed.

03.11.2013 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Clear. I watch the shooting that surely was one and the same individual or not. If anyone can confirm - Confirm ...

03.11.2013 12:15, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, sorry, did not have time, and wanted to unite together and send this beauty http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21686, which inaccurately identified as Eugene Illiberis hyalina.

03.11.2013 12:09, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Eugene! I am glad that aglaja I also had in mind in his first assumption) So anything made out of that debate, although the impression was just that - the chaos in all kind Argynnis, not only Fabriciana (well, it is in my opinion not spets a))

03.11.2013 11:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you Alexander! Letter sent, waiting for an answer.

03.11.2013 10:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

The largest specialist zygaenidae the former Soviet Union: Konstantin Efetov - efetov.konst@gmail.com (address of publication 2013)

03.11.2013 9:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I postponed it by analogy setim photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/15699 there and the author and the region are the same.
Alexander rights. Parnas not a band, which can be here, so, "with a light hand" to determine. Even the most ordinary Apollo.

03.11.2013 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Instead comae? I will not touch them yet.

03.11.2013 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 8:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eudonia lacustrata / Vitaly Gumenuk Scoparia basistrigalis / Dmitry Borisyuk.

03.11.2013 8:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree.

03.11.2013 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, correct, whether suffered?

03.11.2013 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudozizeeria maha / Tentatively identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

03.11.2013 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, remove the photo showing the kind of blues Micra here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23556
Climb and climb are not there for some reason :)

03.11.2013 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

03.11.2013 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spalgis epius / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

03.11.2013 3:45, Peter Khramov:

Eugene is on what pages? Or are you about the official theme only?

03.11.2013 3:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Il! I looked Japanese link. You almost convinced me that this Illiberis consimilis. Agree 99.9%. Link is interesting, there is a view from above and from the side. What doubt to accept a 100% in Japanese pictures you remember the same black bars, but there is in addition to, perpendicular to this long, it arranged short, the same black color.Here, these short strips in the form of shadows, light gray. Maybe this is due to age, but who would have explained? Even if the pro Basil writes that he doubted that she even determined! That much I say the kettle.
Somewhere, like you, I saw a reference to a person occupying a famili zygaenidae. He would show, mail it needed to throw

03.11.2013 3:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Peter! You could not make that new messages appear at the top (ie, reverse the order)? I now have a slow connection, you will not wait until it's all loaded ... :)

03.11.2013 3:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO Z. maha. Not exactly.

03.11.2013 3:10, Eugene Karolinskiy:

With a group of adippe-like (ie, subgenus Fabriciana) there really is chaos and chaos, but it now seems to be not the case. :)

03.11.2013 3:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Returning from the fields of "special" finds that these things A. aglaja, female. :)

03.11.2013 2:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Without a question mark, perhaps. Reassurance, just in case (just checked there are no other species of this genus in Thailand). :)

03.11.2013 2:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Spalgis? Epius

03.11.2013 2:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Illiberis consimilis / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

03.11.2013 1:31, Dmitry Borisyuk:

IMHO, of course, this butterfly is not like Eudonia lacustrata, but rather on Scoparia basistrigalis.
Watched here: http://lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Eudonia_Lacustrata

03.11.2013 0:45, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, here are a couple of references to tracks Illiberis consimilis http://design-room.img.jugem.jp/20130720_1751422.jpg and http://aoki2.si.gunma-u.ac.jp/youtyuu/HTMLs/ruriirosukasikuroba. html. Convincingly, I think, especially when you consider that the species is common to your seats.

03.11.2013 0:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Transfer can be: the same shot at Sungaya (at the bottom only colors other Gumenyuk shamans probably): http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1269-autographa-mandarina

03.11.2013 0:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.11.2013 0:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aleksanr, get something and do not want to once again why the link to Dubatolov led (currently looked carefully and do more on karelini like) :) But we must wait and Igor hope he will be able to explain something about this instance.

03.11.2013 0:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, you are pushing hard moderators to change. This butterfly has no label. and you see it. In sredneaziartskoy Axiopoena maura in the Caucasus have double Axiopoena karelini. Butterflies are very similar, differ in good and bad genitals visually, only the lower figure wings that both species varies.This Butterfly wing pattern more suited to Axiopoena maura, as specified in the definition, without a precise definition of the geography of photos can not be. However, you acknowledge that the type is defined correctly. I conclude that you vseravno the correctness of the definition. Not on your nelly not want to offend no one. and certainly leapfrog to arrange ICs photos.Basil suffered, it means that you have convinced me there. I wrote in the report his opinion, this is enough.

03.11.2013 0:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We saw Sergei all your confirmation and again they should not be permanently apat: please be considerate. Do not try to impose their personal views, but rather reinforce such arguments (links, etc.).

03.11.2013 0:02, Sergei Kotov:

No, it does matter for me, if I'm wrong, please say it straight and move it back.

03.11.2013 0:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, a butterfly without geography, on Axiopoena karelini, do not get boishsya, Sergei anyway, as I understand it.

02.11.2013 23:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, this is definitely worth a move: http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lepidop/images/Axiopoena_maura.htm

02.11.2013 23:58, Sergei Kotov:

So you don't know how apollo looks like? Great! So I was right calling this theatre of the absurd. No other words for that.

02.11.2013 23:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.11.2013 23:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, less emotion, more business, and I do not know much Apollos, waiting for confirmation by another person, your opinion is already seen.

02.11.2013 23:41, Sergei Kotov:

Well, this is all a theater of the absurd! Apollo, we ... in certain inaccuracies. More than a year. Maybe still fix it someone? ...

02.11.2013 23:20, Sergei Kotov:

Peter, I can not answer. In this photo, and that that link http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13966 - two different butterflies. It is clearly visible. The photograph on the link http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13966 shown quite a normal Melitaea athalia, there is no error. But in the photograph on this page shows a butterfly that checkered Atal difficult to call, because it is not checkered Atalia and avriniyaEuphydryas aurinia.

02.11.2013 22:42, Peter Khramov:

Here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13966? ZY Sergey, put a link to view only the first message or after a long break, OK? Otherwise polluted page. See. Http://lepidoptera.ru/community/17129

02.11.2013 22:37, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Melitaea athalia. It -Euphydryas aurinia

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:18, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:17, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 22:08, Sergei Kotov:

Agree with aforesaid. Couldn't you write it right then for me not to repeat it thrice. I thought you either didn't notice (went back to the third page of comments) or just forgot...

02.11.2013 22:05, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.11.2013 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caterpillar L2 of the Amur region the end of August, and you determine with certainty to the species, and repeat three times, this my hand will not rise even in its priblezhenno certain move, even though I saw dozens of caterpillars Armiger, like ?, indisputable similar, but only just.

02.11.2013 21:31, Sergei Kotov:

BanalHelicoverpa armigera

02.11.2013 19:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis inundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.11.2013 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis inundana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.11.2013 18:03, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I have done.

02.11.2013 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.11.2013 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrhoe alternata / Tentatively identified / Dmitry Borisyuk.

02.11.2013 17:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter in this form has no photosApotomis capreana, it is necessary to clean the page of the form.

02.11.2013 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apotomis capreana / Vitaly Gumenuk Apotomis sauciana / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.11.2013 17:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apotomis capreana / Vitaly Gumenuk Apotomis sauciana / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.11.2013 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apotomis capreana / Vitaly Gumenuk Apotomis sauciana / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.11.2013 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis betuletana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.11.2013 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.11.2013 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.11.2013 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.11.2013 16:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.11.2013 13:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Thanks, it became so clear))

02.11.2013 11:19, Sergei Kotov:

BanalPieris brassicae

02.11.2013 11:19, Sergei Kotov:

BanalPieris brassicae

02.11.2013 11:12, Yuri Semejkin:

This image yellow spot comes from the root area and further along the costal margin, ie it is long. At others. Images, such http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/24383 it locally, is located just near the root area, occupying a small area.
Question: Can these differences be used in the diagnosis? or spot a change during the life of a butterfly?

02.11.2013 9:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Shot on Actinidia

02.11.2013 9:26, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Sorry ... Nymph flatidy (slip ....)

02.11.2013 9:24, Svetlana Shchavelina:

I have the same friend of Ty identified as a nymph flavidy: http://macroclub.ru/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/110433/ppuser/4442/cat/500

02.11.2013 1:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Dmitry Borisyuk Alexandr Zhakov.

02.11.2013 1:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

/ Cossus cossus / Alexandr Zhakov.

02.11.2013 1:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Plexus leaves, where there was a caterpillar, I think.

02.11.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Ova Larva.

02.11.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.11.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Author grit that one and the same individual. I stand.

01.11.2013 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Apparently, Andrew had in mind that this is a general view of the plant with a caterpillar, and she is shown in the adjacent fotah ...

01.11.2013 21:32, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 21:06, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Author, comment, please, where is the caterpillar? I do not see it :)

01.11.2013 20:56, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Maybe not an egg, but still a caterpillar?

01.11.2013 20:54, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Can move in precise? What other options besides argiades?

01.11.2013 20:00, Peter Khramov:

Where would it take specialists in the Far East ...

01.11.2013 19:58, Peter Khramov:

I like this. It is a pity, as the wings of a muddy washed out, as well, and in general it would be interesting.

01.11.2013 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Written by the author and see what answer ...

01.11.2013 11:30, Sergei Kotov:

No questions.

01.11.2013 11:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Unusual color form, with the absence of color otpredelitelnyh elements such copies. it is always advisable to keep in inaccurate.

01.11.2013 11:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Write - larva leafhoppers

01.11.2013 10:47, Sergei Kotov:

Rather, aphids and biting midges.

01.11.2013 10:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Well, I'd also say that some "Grasshopper" ...

01.11.2013 10:23, Sergei Kotov:

The one that Madagascar - no butterfly.

01.11.2013 9:58, Shamil Murtazin:

I did not open a new topic.
That's such a beast in the network saw. Write - butterfly. Madagascar.
http://cs309325.vk.me/v309325716/9bbc/OlwefjxN6ls.jpg

Opredeljaemost? =)

01.11.2013 6:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nowhere will not endure. It does not put in place appropriate such definitions. Only just compete back and forth. 40th Region: however. All: fading on the day (work).

01.11.2013 5:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There are at least 2 more species in that region.

01.11.2013 4:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where the conclusion that exactly?

01.11.2013 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 4:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:50, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:50, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:48, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:48, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:48, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:48, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:48, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:47, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:47, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:46, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:46, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:46, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:45, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:44, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Melitaea athalia. It -Euphydryas aurinia

01.11.2013 0:41, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:40, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:40, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:36, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:35, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:35, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:35, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:34, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:34, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:34, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:34, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:34, Sergei Kotov:

If an author is correct, then what prevents drag in precisely defined?

01.11.2013 0:33, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:32, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:30, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:30, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:30, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei is your opinion :), the site they are not formally linked to the image of a butterfly. :)

01.11.2013 0:28, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Gandaritis pyraliata. It -Eulithis mellinata

01.11.2013 0:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:26, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:24, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, in this photo the same butterfly, as here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22493.
We must still fulfill a formality and drag in exact.

01.11.2013 0:22, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:22, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:22, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:21, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:21, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:20, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:20, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:20, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:19, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:18, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:18, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

This image, for the most part do not need to type the name. :))

01.11.2013 0:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:14, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:12, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pyrausta despicata / Vitaly Gumenuk Psammotis pulveralis / Sergei Kotov.

01.11.2013 0:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pyrausta despicata / Vitaly Gumenuk Psammotis pulveralis / Sergei Kotov.

01.11.2013 0:11, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:10, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:10, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:09, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:09, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:08, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:08, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:08, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:08, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:08, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vitaly Gumenuk Alexandr Zhakov.

01.11.2013 0:07, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eucosma lacteana / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Eucosma metzneriana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.11.2013 0:06, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eucosma lacteana / Tentatively identified Eucosma metzneriana / Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:04, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Pyrausta despicata. It -Psammotis pulveralis

01.11.2013 0:04, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Pyrausta despicata. It -Psammotis pulveralis

01.11.2013 0:02, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:02, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:01, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:01, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

01.11.2013 0:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

01.11.2013 0:00, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 23:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 23:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 23:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 23:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 23:35, Sergei Kotov:

Well, what do you suggest? It would be another, better photo - it could be removed without further ado. But there is another picture, and therefore, "the rich, and so happy" :)

31.10.2013 23:32, Sergei Kotov:

BanalHelicoverpa armigera

31.10.2013 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

But the focus of the eye :)))

31.10.2013 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

still not clear about what kind of speech that does not seen, only hints at the picture.

31.10.2013 23:19, Sergei Kotov:

This photo for this species only, so no choice.

31.10.2013 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

31.10.2013 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

31.10.2013 23:05, Sergei Kotov:

Specifically for this butterfly - wait for the verdict of experts.

31.10.2013 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

But these photos better clean up to the store, but not put on public display. :)

31.10.2013 22:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Ancylis geminana Ancylis diminutana.

31.10.2013 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysocrambus craterella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 22:41, Sergei Kotov:

Not sylvanus it is, not sylvanus. I already said before that I happened to collect many of sylvanus, they are quite different in my neck of the woods.
Question to all: if there any info about sylvanus ssp. in Far East? Nominative or anything else.

31.10.2013 22:41, Sergei Kotov:

Not sylvanus it is, not sylvanus. I already said before that I happened to collect many of sylvanus, they are quite different in my neck of the woods.
Question to all: if there any info about sylvanus ssp. in Far East? Nominative or anything else.

31.10.2013 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apotomis sororculana / Vitaly Gumenuk Apotomis betuletana / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 22:38, Sergei Kotov:

Pieris melete (inaccuracy)

31.10.2013 22:37, Sergei Kotov:

Pieris melete (inaccuracy)

31.10.2013 22:35, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eudemis profundana / Vitaly Gumenuk Apotomis inundana / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 22:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Eudemis porphyrana / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Apotomis inundana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

her eyes were red with shame

31.10.2013 22:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

The definition may also erroneous, we must also take a closer look, but certainly not original.

31.10.2013 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Acleris aspersana / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Acleris hastiana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 22:08, Irina Nikulina:

I was just embarrassed your categorical conclusion. Well, if only "" personal opinion "that it would be better instead of" uniquely accurate "at least put IMHO). Although it is possible that not Sylvanus. Perspective is not very convenient.

31.10.2013 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apotomis infida / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

31.10.2013 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

During interesting: poor pierid :)

31.10.2013 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

31.10.2013 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Not identified.

31.10.2013 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well tady back into the cabbage. Koli Alexander confirmed :)

31.10.2013 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.10.2013 21:59, Irina Nikulina:

Well, do not tell) Breakthrough indisputable. And dulcinea with melete ever surrender)

31.10.2013 21:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Not identified.

31.10.2013 21:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

I meant this should be as well disranked :))

31.10.2013 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 21:58, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, so it w in the group), "little face" the same one that just in limbo.

31.10.2013 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, where it? As you can kind of know something? :)

31.10.2013 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Apotomis infida / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

31.10.2013 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

This photo lurking like a decent Pieris brassicae :))

31.10.2013 21:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In nepredelёnnye without talking.

31.10.2013 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba sperchius / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

31.10.2013 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

31.10.2013 21:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

JW et in the area: stand.

31.10.2013 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lozotaenia forsterana / Vitaly Gumenuk Pandemis cerasana / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong definition. How invisible.

31.10.2013 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong definition. How invisible.

31.10.2013 21:48, Sergei Kotov:

Marumba sperchius

31.10.2013 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lozotaenia forsterana / Vitaly Gumenuk Apotomis infida / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 21:47, Sergei Kotov:

I collect sylvanus regularly. Can be some local subspecies in Primorye, however those sylvanus I see in Central Russia, don't look at all like the specimen featured. Blurred spots and an odd-looking main dark yellow. Our sylvanus here have it lighter, yellow ochre, and yellow spots are more distinct. Whatever, I'm not a pro in Primorye Hesperiidae, just my personal opinion, I might be wrong.

31.10.2013 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eh .... Any rake "Augean stables" does not work :(

31.10.2013 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pieris brassicae / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Not identified.

31.10.2013 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In so vague in nepredelёnnye :)

31.10.2013 21:31, Irina Nikulina:

Indeed, as Eugene said- "It is clear only that it is not brassicae") ought to it from brassicae in the undefined yet. (Itself still tend to P. melete)

31.10.2013 21:25, Irina Nikulina:

Sergey, could you explain Sylvanus no-one. In venatus underside almost monochrome, ochracea is also very different looks ...

31.10.2013 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

31.10.2013 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

31.10.2013 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

100% sure?

31.10.2013 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified / Imago Confidently identified / Female.

31.10.2013 21:12, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus icarus

31.10.2013 21:08, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

31.10.2013 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina had just been laid out so :)

31.10.2013 21:02, Irina Nikulina:

Yura, I think that it is a female Pieris melete summer generation. My thoughts on this here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/24342. Word of specialists.

31.10.2013 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris melete / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.10.2013 21:00, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 21:00, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 21:00, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 20:59, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 20:59, Sergei Kotov:

The precisely defined.

31.10.2013 20:55, Irina Nikulina:

Photo not very good. quality, but it delivered to a supplement to the photo # 24342, and to the description under it - the underside.

31.10.2013 20:54, Irina Nikulina:

Photo not very good. quality, but it delivered to a supplement to the photo # 24342, and to the description below it - this can be seen on the rear fenders

31.10.2013 20:52, Irina Nikulina:

This is the second female (summer) generation sits on the caterpillar host plant Cardamine leucantha (family Brassicaceae) (30 seconds starts off on his eggs, a couple of pictures too, they are not too sharp, but put one with the underside). The eternal question - dulcinea or melete? Between females and melete dulcinea summer generation to opt for melete .The females of summer generation melete widespread pollination apex below 2 spots that spread out along the veins and very noticeable sputtering central cell, especially the bottom of her veins. At the rear wing blackened veins to the outer edge and has a spot at the front edge. (Dark female figure dulcinea summer generation is less developed).On the underside rear wing yellowish veins sometimes barely translucent. Butterfly was quite large - melete usually larger dulcinea. Some sources (eg in the determinant Sochivko and Kabaka) also notes that dulcinea flying to August, while melete often delayed until September (the picture was taken at about 7.09. Russian).But about the same orange spot on the underside of the wing at the root , I can not say anything other than the fact that it is precisely melete (and it is a given individual). Korshunov marks his only melete. But the photographs online, including here (definition of Dm. Pozhogin and Al. Zhakova), there is a speck and dulcinea, but less bright and pronounced.I do not think that it can serve as a "diagnostic feature"?
Word for spec-s.
(Use the description of species from Korshunova. [2], as well as pictures and description http://rusinsects.com/pi-dulc.htm
http://rusinsects.com/pi-mele.htm, http://catocala.narod.ru/pier08.html, http://catocala.narod.ru/pier09.html)

31.10.2013 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It was good, would bring. Goose knows someone?

31.10.2013 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais urticae / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

31.10.2013 20:34, Sergei Kotov:

Definitely not exactly sylvanus. In Primorye, blue stain is present on three of the genus Ochlodes: ochracea, subhyalina and venatus. I think one of them.

31.10.2013 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nymphalis xanthomelas / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

31.10.2013 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia basistrigalis / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

31.10.2013 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Furcula furcula / Vitaly Gumenuk Furcula bifida / Sergei Kotov.

31.10.2013 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Furcula furcula / Vitaly Gumenuk Furcula bifida / Sergei Kotov.

31.10.2013 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Angle uncomfortable.

31.10.2013 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectropis crepuscularia / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

31.10.2013 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

31.10.2013 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Less exclamation marks: eye cuts :)

31.10.2013 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Cerura erminea / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Cerura vinula / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

31.10.2013 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura felina / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.10.2013 19:05, Sergei Kotov:

Cerura felina(in inaccurate). Move right.

31.10.2013 19:04, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 19:04, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 19:02, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Cerura erminea! It -Cerura vinula

31.10.2013 19:00, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida
Move right.

31.10.2013 19:00, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida
Move right.

31.10.2013 18:57, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 18:57, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 18:57, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 18:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 18:53, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2013 18:52, Sergei Kotov:

Ectropis crepuscularia

31.10.2013 17:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Ochlodes sylvanus?

31.10.2013 15:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips viola / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 15:28, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips viola / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 1:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Halysidota pectenella / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 0:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Halysidota orientaliscloser is not something found

31.10.2013 0:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris rhombana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.10.2013 0:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris rhombana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.10.2013 23:18, Sergei Kotov:

Nothing similar is not there. Other Polia radically differently look.

30.10.2013 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

30.10.2013 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Alcis bastelbergeri / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypomecis punctinalis / Confidently identified / Male / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Something else, or not very typical, no view from the top, guess not.

30.10.2013 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Geometra papilionaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2013 22:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anticypella diffusaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This DV, and with him were not kidding :)

30.10.2013 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Alexandr Zhakov.

30.10.2013 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, after your first suggestion :)
I drag and drop.

30.10.2013 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Athletes ethra / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

30.10.2013 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ind. severely broken life, but in my opinion, too Athletes ethra: I put until inaccurate.

30.10.2013 20:27, Sergei Kotov:

Have a good trip! Get plenty of interesting species, good pictures and vivid impressions!

30.10.2013 20:00, Peter Khramov:

Bring-bring! Nagryante And, of course, a must!) Thailand - direction, though popular, but for the gallery site is still very, very exotic.

30.10.2013 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Camera with flash and fitted even without additional reflectors can get quality shots much higher than the average site. It is sometimes necessary vspyh in full, sometimes only to supplement the sun.
But yes, you can do even better if you use Remote. But most of the images is not enough is not it: -)

30.10.2013 19:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Sibine nesea / Tentatively identified / Imago / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 19:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

30.10.2013 19:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Anticypella diffusaria / Confidently identified / Male / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 19:43, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Anticypella diffusaria / Confidently identified / Male / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 19:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spatalistis christophana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.10.2013 19:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spatalistis christophana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.10.2013 17:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

I myself do not know, if I knew, suffered :) there must again climb on the SA sites, to see what was happening :)

30.10.2013 16:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where it is necessary to leave? Just once and drag. Not just knew.

30.10.2013 16:51, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, Sergey, thanks for your useful elaboration. Fairly speaking, I originally IDed this moth as griseola but the last bit I changed to complana, the color around its head confused me)) I should have minded its wing width and resting pose! Now I know.

30.10.2013 16:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, is that you did nothing, this kind of site is already in another kind Sibine nesea, will now be confusion :( I just have not gotten your hands, there still are several types emerged, it was necessary to clarify. :)

30.10.2013 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added by genus and species :)

30.10.2013 16:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acharia nesea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

30.10.2013 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Angerona prunaria / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

30.10.2013 16:03, Shamil Murtazin:

By the time the outbreak was probably in order not to use the on-camera flash.
From it obtained shadow ghosting - because it does not coincide with the position of the lens, plus on nearby objects "knocked out" to the state of the color white.
Sam is the use an external flash. So it is possible to blur the shadow pattern make it more readable.Recommendation to take a picture without flash slipped somewhere in the dialogues. I do not remember now.

30.10.2013 15:55, Svetlana Shchavelina:

And I'm in the middle of November in Tai (for, though ...) Fly away! I hope, bring you some photos.
And another friend of Ty said that where she lives, in May, is the invasion of butterflies all around them plastered. Here I think now as I would podgadat descend to visit her at the moment .... It would have been interesting.

30.10.2013 14:26, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2013 14:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Angerona prunaria / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

30.10.2013 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Fentonia ocypete / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phrygionis privignaria / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

30.10.2013 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Add that not all cameras running flash mode makrosёmki. In my soapbox, it just automatically switched off in the "Super" what is right so as to be sure the minimum distance illumination.Collectible copies shoot recommend using as a backlight fluorescent lamps and always with an electronic starting (flickering by high frequency start is practically none), shoot with a tripod and use as a background sheet of white paper.Well and accordingly shaman with some simple editor to correct (as I said I use ACDSee Pro 6). Communicate with complex prog type of Photoshop in this case is not necessary.

30.10.2013 12:33, Sergei Kotov:

Actually, it's rather easy. Eilema griseola has way wider wings than other Eilema moths. This is seen well in photos and due to that Eilema griseola can't be mistaken for other Lithosiinae similar in color. Those can much confuse me and I usually thoroughly recheck such moths.

30.10.2013 12:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema griseola / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Two opinions speak for the transfer :)

30.10.2013 12:22, Sergei Kotov:

Scoparia basistrigalis

30.10.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, not complana /
We live E. complana "landing" is another. Rather, it isEilema griseola
Obozhdёm long endure. Difficult butterfly and it is necessary that the people spoke.

30.10.2013 12:16, Sergei Kotov:

No! Eilema griseola

30.10.2013 12:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Dilemma melete / dulcinea. Anyone can still explain the difference between them?

30.10.2013 12:06, Yuri Semejkin:

If only it were that easy, I would have been overthrown with the definition.

30.10.2013 11:58, Irina Nikulina:

Eilema complana?

30.10.2013 11:20, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there is such a thing. Thanks for the tip, in the next couple of days I will try to improve.

30.10.2013 11:18, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, and where there was a recommendation to take pictures without a flash?As for general comments, the mass of pictures on the site in general (and not necessarily in exactly your) Photos should pay attention to framing (on classics reserve to head Butterfly (in the direction of movement, even if the butterfly on the fact of not moving) more space than at the stern - instead of doing exactly the center or, especially,on the contrary, leave more stern. Second - garbage background against which too many details. I understand that when recording in the field do not always have the opportunity to work with the background, but still there are times, as many fotam again shows that the author of this just was not thinking. Well, out of the field, yes. The people who try to keep my eyes were still in focus.Of course, there are cases where the author deliberately done differently, because there is no hard and fast rules that would be suitable for all pictures and creative ideas. But in most cases it is clear that there was no special pans, but just happened how it happened. Accordingly, if there is a desire and effort to improve their truck - then briefly outlined the situation was.If not - the author of a topic correctly observed, in the case where, for example, without any kind of illustrations on the site, almost any phot will be better than nothing.
ZY In addition to actually shoot a good idea to spend at least some post-processing of color / tone. Well, at least the levels tighten.But! If you do this does not make sense, it is better not to do anything - newcomers tend to greatly overdo with treatment (especially in contrast, color saturation and sharpness).

30.10.2013 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neruda aoede / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

30.10.2013 9:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Form without the white spot on the upper wing apparently common in the region. In my opinion, and I have such a DV.

30.10.2013 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis laodice / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis laodice / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 3:51, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, illustrations cleaned up. Basil, updating of comments will correct, I think, a couple of days.

30.10.2013 3:28, Sergei Kotov:

Nymphalis xanthomelas

30.10.2013 3:27, Sergei Kotov:

Gibddshnaya stick - vymogalka.

30.10.2013 3:23, Sergei Kotov:

Argynnis laodice

30.10.2013 3:23, Sergei Kotov:

Argynnis laodice

30.10.2013 3:22, Sergei Kotov:

Argynome laodice

30.10.2013 3:22, Sergei Kotov:

Argynome laodice

30.10.2013 3:12, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. Kind defined by the author photo.
Alexander Dumchus: "Neruda aoede cupidineus
(Stichel, 1906) "
Move right.

30.10.2013 3:10, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2013 3:06, Sergei Kotov:

?

30.10.2013 2:56, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus icarus

30.10.2013 2:52, Sergei Kotov:

Geometra papilionaria

30.10.2013 2:51, Sergei Kotov:

Hypomecis punctinalis

30.10.2013 2:48, Sergei Kotov:

Alcis bastelbergeri

30.10.2013 2:46, Sergei Kotov:

Polia bombycina

30.10.2013 2:33, Sergei Kotov:

Fentonia ocypeteSource: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=184446&st=200 (watch message URL # 225)

30.10.2013 2:02, Sergei Kotov:

Aglais urticae

30.10.2013 2:01, Sergei Kotov:

Aglais urticae @

30.10.2013 1:53, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2013 1:49, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators! The butterfly has long defined!
Alexander Zhakov "rummaged in the net stimule S.Amerika it. So Acharia nesea.
Peter, genus and species of the evening I shall bring to the directory "
Move it!

30.10.2013 0:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jankowskia athleta / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

30.10.2013 0:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, your opinion is already there, do not repeat, I heard it.

30.10.2013 0:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

On str.http: //lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/14004 photo moths in the genus Sibinek family Limacodidae

30.10.2013 0:49, Sergei Kotov:

"Photos Photo Artist and zoologists - no"
Gold words!

30.10.2013 0:46, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander! I still insist on the option Aricia artaxerxes. At Aricia agestis much more thick red stripe on the edge of the front wing than at Aricia artaxerxes. Here, the edge of the front wing seen enough to see that the red strip is narrow, not broad. Thus, it isAricia artaxerxes

30.10.2013 0:38, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.10.2013 0:30, Sergei Kotov:

BanalHelicoverpa armigera

30.10.2013 0:01, Sergei Kotov:

Cerura felina

29.10.2013 23:59, Sergei Kotov:

Anticypella diffusaria(female) - in the Far East she is one

29.10.2013 23:59, Sergei Kotov:

Anticypella diffusaria(male) - in the Far East she is one

29.10.2013 23:59, Sergei Kotov:

Anticypella diffusaria(male) - in the Far East she is one

29.10.2013 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Generally original. By the way: "Black Sabbath" : one of my favorite bands :)

29.10.2013 23:41, Sergei Kotov:

Jankowskia athletaSource: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=212056&st=100 (watch the first butterfly in the message URL # 103)

29.10.2013 23:35, Shamil Murtazin:

Ozzy Osbourne - lepidopterist.

29.10.2013 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bear this. From the kind of Amaxia (of which there are many). So far, only an association like Ozzy Osbourne has found a network: http://www.flickr.com/photos/indianacristo/6852044427/ Hard to them :)

29.10.2013 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you have fixed a Trouble: If you refresh the page after the transfer type dudbliruetsya comments.
For example, for this image: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22721 (automatically updated).

29.10.2013 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea yamamai / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

29.10.2013 18:11, Sergei Kotov:

No, not one, don't please move, I hurried.

29.10.2013 18:01, Sergei Kotov:

Rothschildia erycina, female.

29.10.2013 17:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

I made a mistake and apologized :) and that Vladivostok is no expert on leaf rollers, the most interesting photos from the pre-imaginal stages of development, and only an approximate determination of the European :(

29.10.2013 15:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander! I do not have any reference to it, and never was.

29.10.2013 14:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aethalura punctulata / Vitaly Gumenuk Hypomecis punctinalis / Sergei Kotov.

29.10.2013 14:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, I apologize, I remember something that you have laid out the butterflies with its definition. Svetlana V. Nedoshivina it three years ago, the protection of leaf rollers Russia. I need to know the Far East.

29.10.2013 14:37, Yuri Semejkin:

She who? Engaged in our tortricidae?

29.10.2013 14:29, Sergei Kotov:

No problem, I will not rush.

29.10.2013 14:29, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida

29.10.2013 14:28, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida

29.10.2013 14:28, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Aethalura punctulata! It -Hypomecis punctinalis

29.10.2013 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

While he did not.

29.10.2013 14:21, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, why do you not have to endure? Is not that right?

29.10.2013 14:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Phrases are the same, different Latin :)))

29.10.2013 14:16, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, I rewrote kommnt three times. I did not want to operate the command "two dogs on both sides." He appeared italics instead of referring to the form. But I still got his way, even if the third attempt.

29.10.2013 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sitochroa verticalis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

29.10.2013 14:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Maybe

29.10.2013 14:11, Irina Nikulina:

Sitochroa verticalis?

29.10.2013 14:09, Yuri Semejkin:

If it's only my bug? The same message is repeated thrice.

29.10.2013 14:01, Sergei Kotov:

Judging by the caterpillar, not exactly Kentrochrysalis streckeri. In Primorye, there is another species of this genus -Kentrochrysalis sieversi. Maybe he?

29.10.2013 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

This butterfly is very similar to light frmu Spatalistis christophana, but may be a type of Acleris,

29.10.2013 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

This butterfly is very similar to light frmu Spatalistis christophana, but may be a type of Acleris, which have more than 50, and I certainly do not know, you have to ask Nedoshivin.

29.10.2013 13:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nemo omnia potest scire

29.10.2013 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Somebody doubts? Error transference correct. Thank you pointed out!

29.10.2013 13:27, Sergei Kotov:

"Do not mistake only one who does nothing."
Gold words!

29.10.2013 13:26, Sergei Kotov:

Spilosoma lutea- rationale here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6485

29.10.2013 13:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Do not mistake only one who does nothing.

29.10.2013 13:18, Sergei Kotov:

And why is still in uncertain? Antheraea yamamaiit.

29.10.2013 13:15, Sergei Kotov:

Spilosoma lutea- I googled for other species inhabiting (by blueness) in Primorye, and found that this appearance could only have caterpillars Spilosoma luteum

29.10.2013 13:14, Sergei Kotov:

Spilosoma lutea - I googled for other species inhabiting (by blueness) in Primorye, and found that this appearance could only have caterpillars Spilosoma luteum

29.10.2013 13:14, Sergei Kotov:

Spilosoma luteum- I googled for other species inhabiting (by blueness) in Primorye, and found that this appearance could only have caterpillars Spilosoma luteum

29.10.2013 13:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei Kotov, let's keep the discussion here, several different people did you remark about whining, I repeat do not want to. The more you do the definitions, the greater the error. But the percentage of errors you have fallen sharply, this is good.These two species are very widely vary in color and size, and even the presence of a white stroke, and can often be mistaken, I was cooking, I know :). What is the offense? behave correctly with respect to all participants. and you will get the same attitude. But everyone can make mistakes and wrong, from this no one is immune.But we should not build its own errors and uncertainty in the rank of bias moderators. Good luck in the definition.

29.10.2013 12:52, Sergei Kotov:

Ok, let it be in not identified as I'm constantly wrong :(((

29.10.2013 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not convincing :)

29.10.2013 12:36, Sergei Kotov:

These types differ in the width of the white stripe on the front wings. In Agriphila selasella wide white stripe, while Agriphila tristella white stripes or not at all, or it is significantly narrower than the Agriphila selasella. Furthermore, the overall color is different wings. In Agriphila selasella are lighter, yellow ocher, they have Agriphila tristella with a dark-colored, yellow - brown. In this case, I was on set forAgriphila selasella.

29.10.2013 12:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

A reason notAgriphila tristella?

29.10.2013 12:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila straminella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

29.10.2013 11:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cerura erminea / Sergey Ionov Cerura vinula / Sergei Kotov.

29.10.2013 11:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

I have this beauty to belong to Cerura przewalskyi checked. I could be wrong.

29.10.2013 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

29.10.2013 11:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! I am amazed at your composure.
Sergei Kotov Photo Saga nothing to do with. There is a theme "The relationship of users and moderators". to go ahead and his opus, young man

29.10.2013 11:37, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Licka this site has. Go to the tab "Authors", select the user, and go to his page. Dumped his e-mail and personal resources (if any). However, in a personal and rude - bad form. Controversial issues can and should be addressed with a cool head.

29.10.2013 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, this site is not anonymous, e-mail address specified for each author in the "Authors", study site, write to your private address. :)

29.10.2013 11:29, Sergei Kotov:

Svetlana Oxalic answer. In a post you wrote "write to the PM."
PM on this site, to the great regret, is not, and therefore will have to resolve disputes directly in the comments.

29.10.2013 11:27, Sergei Kotov:

"Write in a personal"
PM on this site, to the great regret, is not, and therefore will have to resolve disputes directly in the comments.

29.10.2013 11:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

The exact definition, when the author considers its definition variants only right.Imprecise definition, is when there is question in the correct definition, closely related species, which do not know and can not find the image, differences in color, the timing of summer, absence litrature information on finding this species in this area, the lack of Data on geography and srokm photography,not visible dimensions butterflies and the like.
If there are 2 or more similar species, then there is incorrectly defined as at least 50%, and there are very, very carefully, you can choose for kostvennym grounds where the percentage higher, please do it :) regional representatives who know their fauna.Genetalnye types are best left vague (not all, conventional genetalnye species are).
Haste is needed when catching fleas, and doubt one author, can not be put as the truth, need each Confirmed if I stand, then share the responsibility transfer.

29.10.2013 11:24, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Cerura erminea! It -Cerura vinula

29.10.2013 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris napi / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

29.10.2013 11:17, Sergei Kotov:

Pieris napi

29.10.2013 11:16, Sergei Kotov:

Nymphalis xanthomelas

29.10.2013 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba sperchius / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

29.10.2013 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema blanda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.10.2013 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema blanda / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.10.2013 11:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catoblepia xanthus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

29.10.2013 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Damora sagana / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

29.10.2013 11:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Damora sagana / Confidently identified / Male / Eugene Karolinskiy.

29.10.2013 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With this the user stops all communication and do their job as the moderator.
I do not know just where Sergei saw the rude (and did not get a clear answer)? Of course I understand, on a human, a person genuinely wants to help the site: it is commendable.But why is it so strongly, to insist on the transfer of mass exclamation marks (which is mauvais ton). Yes, and sometimes giving an obviously incorrect definition. After all, I believe that transferring photos moderator shares the responsibility to identify. All said, enough is enough.

29.10.2013 10:44, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Men, are you - wild? !!!
No one in the Internet space are not allowed to contact other disrespectful and rude, even for the first time, though in return. Want pohamit - write in a personal, and here you and others read, actually. I say this to you very seriously as a moderator of another resource boooolshoy experience and the owner of its own resources.

29.10.2013 10:21, Sergei Kotov:

I did not understand well, just fanned the tragedy because of a trifle. Well written comments, and wrote. More photos will not be connected to comment. And again I say: I will respond to rudeness rudeness. Do you need it? Maybe you already start to talk to me normally, but not in such a tone?

29.10.2013 10:18, Sergei Kotov:

Why just spam. Spam - Spam is a message advertising. And here I do not advertise.

29.10.2013 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, my ideology to spread pre-defined types (precisely or not does not matter: calm and balanced corrections are welcome in any case). And if you talk about the ideology of the transfer: a certain kind of pictured
I must undergo exposure in uncertain so as corrections may occur anyway.It is not good because someone is constantly jumping to conclusions to drag photos from species to species.
That's such a conservative.

29.10.2013 4:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What do you see in my post sharp and unfair? GPs I see on this page the next, completely neuzhny comment that would otherwise not be called spam. If it were not united photos were, and were individually then another thing: should indicate that it is the top-mole of the butterfly, whose underside is shown in such a picture.And why here? The life of me, I do not see the logic.

29.10.2013 2:49, Sergei Kotov:

Agriphila selasella

29.10.2013 2:48, Sergei Kotov:

Agriphila straminella

29.10.2013 2:20, Maxim Schwarz:

Obzhoriki :-)

29.10.2013 1:38, Sergei Kotov:

And what do you react at me ??? I can also. And even harder. And even had time to prove it to you. But tell me at the mercy: it you want? Maybe it is easier to communicate easily? When I was well treated, I am also good in return. But when I start to chat with bad and rude, I'm sorry, this is not going to suffer and I will answer as bad and rude.Here's a math. And you have to put up with it, you want it or not.

29.10.2013 1:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So why write it? After photos are linked to the group top-underside. In the morning I get home and send it as a male Damora sagana in place. Or do you think that this is what the photo is lacking at least one comment?

29.10.2013 0:30, Sergei Kotov:

The same butterfly, as in the photo # 23885, therefore, A. sagana

29.10.2013 0:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hydraecia micacea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

28.10.2013 23:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

And rightly so. For this IMHO A. sagana. :)

28.10.2013 23:08, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aricia agestis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

28.10.2013 22:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

As small children, super bug confused NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA and Admiral, slip, more than a year in the admirals stood quietly, even Vitali Gumenyuk, noticed the mistake. (I do not know even such productive photographer, though sometimes with photoshop pereshamanivaet. :))) and then just unbearable: ASAP :)))

28.10.2013 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Vanessa atalanta / Petr Khramov Nymphalis antiopa / Igor Sakhno.

28.10.2013 22:48, Sergei Kotov:

I can't get as well why this butterfly is still in Vanessa atalanta. It's obviously Nymphalis antiopa. Should be moved as soon as possible.

28.10.2013 22:46, Sergei Kotov:

At Aricia agestis much more thick red stripe on the edge of the front wing than at Aricia artaxerxes. In this case, of course,Aricia agestis.

28.10.2013 22:29, Irina Nikulina:

The female Aricia agestis?

28.10.2013 21:56, Dmitry Borisyuk:

It may still be moved to N. antiopa?

28.10.2013 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anteros kupris / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2013 21:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marpesia berania / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

28.10.2013 21:30, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anania fuscalis / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk.

28.10.2013 21:26, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Larva.

28.10.2013 21:25, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Something does not look like it on the imago :)

28.10.2013 21:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.10.2013 21:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notodonta ziczac / Vitaly Gumenuk Notodonta dromedarius / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 20:57, Sergei Kotov:

Is this really Cerura erminea? Isn't Cerura vinula?

28.10.2013 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.10.2013 20:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apamea remissa / Vitaly Gumenuk Brachylomia viminalis / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Denticucullus pygmina / Vitaly Gumenuk Photedes fluxa / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Denticucullus pygmina / Vitaly Gumenuk Photedes fluxa / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.10.2013 20:43, Sergei Kotov:

Brachylomia viminalis

28.10.2013 20:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notodonta tritophus / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Notodonta dromedarius / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 20:38, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Notodonta tritophus / Vitaly Gumenuk Notodonta dromedarius / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 20:36, Sergei Kotov:

"I would say that this Cucullia balsamitae"
I am of the same opinion.

28.10.2013 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.10.2013 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

I would say that this Cucullia balsamitae, but then there will be a new kind for the region, it should be everywhere on the lists you define to spread further.

28.10.2013 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determination author photo correct.

28.10.2013 20:24, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudonia pallida / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk.

28.10.2013 20:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

it is also not Apamea remissa, guess where it is

28.10.2013 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apamea remissa / Vitaly Gumenuk Apamea rubrirena / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

P P Alexandr Zhakov.

28.10.2013 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Apamea remissa / Vitaly Gumenuk Parastichtis suspecta / P P.

28.10.2013 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Thaumetopoea processionea / Vitaly Gumenuk Drymonia ruficornis / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 19:07, Sergei Kotov:

Opsibotys fuscalis(Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

28.10.2013 19:06, Sergei Kotov:

Opsibotys fuscalis

28.10.2013 18:55, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida. Gumenyuk all furkul distorted.

28.10.2013 18:54, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Furcula furcula! It -Furcula bifida

28.10.2013 18:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catoblepia xanthus

28.10.2013 18:43, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Thaumetopoea processionea! It -Drymonia ruficornis

28.10.2013 18:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

28.10.2013 18:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema blanda

28.10.2013 18:26, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Aethalura punctulata! It -Hypomecis punctinalis

28.10.2013 18:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Your opinion and your future developments I have absolutely no interest

28.10.2013 18:22, Sergei Kotov:

They live hard lives, thus ragged...:)

28.10.2013 18:18, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Denticucullus pygmina! It -Photedes fluxa

28.10.2013 18:18, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Denticucullus pygmina! It -Photedes fluxa

28.10.2013 18:14, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

28.10.2013 18:07, Sergei Kotov:

Basil, you misunderstood me. I wrote "after all event moderator, I will not either-coh-yes," not because he did not want to be the moderator, but because it does not allow to make other forum members.Even if the administrator asked me to be the moderator, this decision once their voices "against" block other members of the site. I used to sober assessment of the current situation in life. So, the situation now is that becoming a site moderator I do not have any, even the slightest chances.And yes, to become the moderator and the cook in the kitchen, I would very much like to. It would be very valuable and very useful experience for me.

28.10.2013 17:57, Dmitry Borisyuk:

And why is inaccurate? IMHO this is a 100% Celastrina argiolus. And in Ukrane there is nothing else like it.

28.10.2013 17:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergey, generally good going in light of recent komentov make you moderator :) Well, I do otkommentiruyut. Well, no, actually: neudel do not want to cook in this kitchen?

28.10.2013 17:52, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Gluck: view somehow still in inaccurate.

28.10.2013 17:51, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Gluck: view somehow still in inaccurate.

28.10.2013 17:49, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Denticucullus pygmina! It -Denticucullus fluxus

28.10.2013 17:46, Sergei Kotov:

View is wrong, this is not Cucullia umbratica.

28.10.2013 17:41, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Denticucullus pygmina! It -Denticucullus fluxus
People, please tell me how the species fluxus generic name is correctly written! I did not get ...

28.10.2013 17:39, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Denticucullus pygmina! It -Chortodes fluxus

28.10.2013 17:38, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Denticucullus pygmina! It -Chortodes fluxa

28.10.2013 17:38, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Denticucullus pygmina! It -Denticucullus fluxa

28.10.2013 17:13, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Apamea remissa! It -Apamea rubrirena

28.10.2013 17:13, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Apamea remissa! It - Apamea rubrirena

28.10.2013 17:10, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Anorthoa munda! It -Orthosia incerta

28.10.2013 17:03, Sergei Kotov:

Eudonia pallida- she is in Moscow alone

28.10.2013 17:02, Sergei Kotov:

Witlesia pallida

28.10.2013 17:02, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Seen this bug. I open the page of any kind, such as Polyommatus icarus . I pressed down under the picture "All the pictures of this type in a large amount on the same page." So far, everything is normal, displayed photos of Icarus, and the top of the page there are switches "The accuracy of", "Stage of development / floor" and so on, as I understand it to clarify the request.Now, pay attention, I do not change, check the "Only photos Polyommatus icarus " do not remove , click the button "Print". Displays all galareya ("Disabled pictures 17935. The species pictured: 3862").

28.10.2013 16:57, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Notodonta ziczac! It -Notodonta dromedarius

28.10.2013 16:54, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Notodonta tritophus! It -Notodonta dromedarius

28.10.2013 16:53, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Notodonta tritophus! It -Notodonta dromedarius

28.10.2013 16:49, Sergei Kotov:

"And I do not understand why I can and need to trust in the tropical issues?"
Yeah, so, you can not be trusted! Uchtu future.

28.10.2013 16:44, Sergei Kotov:

"By the way, yes. Lord, if you do not know for uncertain foty view, but you know the genus or other supraspecific taxa - write about it in the comments: Soon the site will be able to tie foty not only species, but also to other taxa, the more lower and higher rank "
Well, where is it, this opportunity? More than a year has passed ...

28.10.2013 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parnassius stubbendorfii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2013 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parnassius stubbendorfii

28.10.2013 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Stand in uncertain, it is a sailboat

28.10.2013 14:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sergei Kotov! Of course, I do not know what is your relationship with Basil, but from your post 11:52 jarred me somehow! I do not know and do not understand why I can and need to trust in tropical questions? First Basil can have your opinion, as the moderators, and secondly he can check this kind, and the third can, but you never know what else might be ....

28.10.2013 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Stand in uncertain, it paruchnik.

28.10.2013 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aporia crataegi / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin Not identified.

28.10.2013 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

28.10.2013 13:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 13:03, Sergei Kotov:

At Aricia agestis much more thick red stripe on the edge of the front wing than at Aricia artaxerxes: http://insectamo.ru/rhop/36-rhop/lycaenidae/100-aricia-agestis.

28.10.2013 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Calliteara pudibunda / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Acronicta leporina / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 13:00, Sergei Kotov:

And why in the uncertain?

28.10.2013 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Rhyparia purpurata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Not identified.

28.10.2013 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

What about Aricia agestis, from Ikarov Uberall and Aricia we are waiting for confirmation.

28.10.2013 12:53, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Aporia / Aleksey Gnilenkov Aporia crataegi / Sergei Kotov.

28.10.2013 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I confess, could not see. Tomorrow bear (currently once). At work, I am writing from the phone.

28.10.2013 12:49, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Calliteara pudibunda! It -Acronicta leporina

28.10.2013 12:46, Sergei Kotov:

It is not Polyommatus icarus! It -Aricia artaxerxes

28.10.2013 12:31, Sergei Kotov:

Euthrix potatoria

28.10.2013 12:30, Sergei Kotov:

Euthrix potatoria

28.10.2013 12:29, Sergei Kotov:

Aporia crataegi

28.10.2013 12:28, Sergei Kotov:

Pieris napi

28.10.2013 12:24, Sergei Kotov:

Nymphalis xanthomelas

28.10.2013 12:18, Sergei Kotov:

The same track as in the photo # 20568. Rhyparia purpuratait.

28.10.2013 11:58, Sergei Kotov:

"it is our kitchen is not very clear, understand, the moderator will be!"
Well, after all that happened moderator, I will not either-coh-huh. And you need another site? The controversial question. In my opinion, and three had enough. Obvious delays in responding to the comments no longer there, and this is important.

28.10.2013 11:54, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

28.10.2013 11:52, Sergei Kotov:

Vasily, are you totally blind or what? Right, Alexandr Dumchus' ID is accompanied with a question mark. But later Dmitry Pozhogin decidedly confirmed that ID pressing "This species is identified correctly."??? As I see, we may and should rely on him in "tropical" cases. Don't you? Or have you got blind and didn't see the second message right after your favourite question mark?

28.10.2013 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just last night he walked because of these photos: part transferred and some left in uncertainty. Hence the post. Here you can not rush.

28.10.2013 10:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Anteros kupris Hewitson, 1875

28.10.2013 10:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

My criteria
Butterfly znakoma- cast out by gender and geography. If no- doubt accurate.
Butterfly is not familiar, or something like that somewhere saw. Imprecise definition. Detects up to sort cast out by the nature and the key geography. If there are at least 2 versions, the writing guess. If you do not write anything more-

28.10.2013 9:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, Sergey, wants to help, I told him yesterday explained that the need to remind when proshol large sprok by definition, and the butterfly is not moved, so he recalls. It is not out of malice, but with good :) it our cuisine is not very clear, understand, the moderator will be :))

28.10.2013 8:32, Shamil Murtazin:

wanted to ask is it trueParastichtis suspecta
though, probably just a strange lighting ...

28.10.2013 5:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, nothing you can say? The underside appeared. Actually since yesterday, "apnul" it.

28.10.2013 5:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergey, if there is a question mark without acknowledgment or "like" butterfly me anywhere will not be tolerated (here are some a few years hanging uncertain) until an adequate definition. And do not these constantly apat.

28.10.2013 5:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eupterote asclepiades / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2013 5:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

28.10.2013 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let's wait for confirmation.

28.10.2013 5:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will wait for confirmation.

28.10.2013 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will wait for confirmation.

28.10.2013 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will wait for confirmation.

28.10.2013 5:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marumba juvencus / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.10.2013 5:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The question mark is not visible?

28.10.2013 5:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aporia larraldei / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.10.2013 5:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergei, enough to pull. Communication is not enough? I watched her as recently as yesterday. The verdict: I will not tolerate long-doubtful.

28.10.2013 5:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

28.10.2013 3:16, Sergei Kotov:

The same butterfly, as in the photo # 23881. Aporia larraldeiit.

28.10.2013 3:15, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 3:14, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 3:14, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 2:56, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 2:56, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 2:56, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 2:36, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 2:27, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 2:26, Sergei Kotov:

Well again this bug: when you move a cursor over a preview of the photo on the author's page there's a notice "The species is not identified" whilst on the very photo page all is ok and the species is seen IDed. Not good. To fix up.

28.10.2013 2:23, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

28.10.2013 2:19, Sergei Kotov:

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

27.10.2013 23:50, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 23:44, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xanthia icteritia / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 23:31, Sergei Kotov:

Xanthia icteritia(inaccuracy)

27.10.2013 23:24, Sergei Kotov:

And what does this question mark?

27.10.2013 23:18, Shamil Murtazin:

?

27.10.2013 22:38, Sergei Kotov:

The accurate. Zygaenidae of the tracks are well characterized.

27.10.2013 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.10.2013 22:10, Sergei Kotov:

So be it. No questions.

27.10.2013 22:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, slow down here, if you just do not know, do not write and photo Central tracks in southern Kazakhstan not rattling the Germans on this site have refused my tracks from Ukraine to determine, "you may have other forms."

27.10.2013 21:55, Sergei Kotov:

This can be accurate to endure.

27.10.2013 21:55, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 21:52, Sergei Kotov:

Cucullia tanacetiSource: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Cucullia_Tanaceti

27.10.2013 21:29, Sergei Kotov:

Phragmatobia fuliginosa

27.10.2013 21:22, Sergei Kotov:

Scotopteryx chenopodiata

27.10.2013 21:20, Sergei Kotov:

Scotopteryx chenopodiata

27.10.2013 21:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter. I cleaned it, two kinds Pandemis heparana and Pandemis cerasana, poperenosi incorrectly defined, but on the page type, there were pictures, pictures are transferred to another species like to be here, you will be correct?

27.10.2013 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus and species added any synonyms if the Germans do not believe in and stand Dmitry :)

27.10.2013 21:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Citheronoides collaris / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.10.2013 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nobody else comes to mind.

27.10.2013 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Antheraea pernyi / Tentatively identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.10.2013 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena proboscidalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 20:39, Sergei Kotov:

"Sergey, there are a lot of things we're solidary about, just different approaches"
If I was wrong about something, will do my best to get right. :)

27.10.2013 20:37, Sergei Kotov:

"Butterflies are very different, different colors, different shapes sling, Do not you see it?"
Well, actually, yes, I agree that there are differences.
No questions.

27.10.2013 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I am also in favor, but there are also online and worse. Even in the highly respected resources.

27.10.2013 20:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, we are largely in agreement, but the approaches are different :)))

27.10.2013 20:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Butterflies are very different, different colors, different shapes sling, Do not you see it? Each type of it is specific, there are certainly copies. which are difficult to attribute to the specific type, but mostly they are normally different.

27.10.2013 20:25, Sergei Kotov:

It is understood, therefore there are no specific features in appearance, which can be distinguished? Or maybe you just do not want the secret is divided and because of the direct response go?

27.10.2013 20:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

I cooked a lot of them, at one time, and decided for myself a lot of questions, when there was no color pictures.

27.10.2013 20:23, Sergei Kotov:

"Photos are better in the furnace :("
Both hands!
Hooray!!! Even though what we are with you in solidarity!

27.10.2013 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

these photos better into the furnace :(

27.10.2013 20:21, Sergei Kotov:

Alexandr, one question please? You're so good in identifying Pandemis cerasana and Pandemis heparana, I'd love to know how to. Please share your secret? You may reply right with a personal message on molbiol or even by e-mail not to bother folks here.

27.10.2013 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paradarisa consonaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 20:18, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Hypomecis punctinalis Hypomecis roboraria.

27.10.2013 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.10.2013 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dynamine aerata / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Athyma asura / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Athyma asura / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila selasella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiphile lampethusa / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.10.2013 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Epiphile iblis / Alex Dumchus Epiphile orea / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila tristella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 20:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dynamine aerata inaccurate

27.10.2013 20:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you!

27.10.2013 20:01, Sergei Kotov:

And this I did not say that. No need to think out of me !!! But in general I am for a serious site. Now this I said, and I can be to blame for it.

27.10.2013 20:00, Sergei Kotov:

Determinative.

27.10.2013 19:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Got it, you want to lightly. No further questions.

27.10.2013 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, you define or guessing :)))

27.10.2013 19:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Athyma asura

27.10.2013 19:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It Athyma asura

27.10.2013 19:56, Sergei Kotov:

But mind you, Alexander, first about the "serious site" I speak not, and you Napara Irina Nikulina !!! Do not attribute these words to me.

27.10.2013 19:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, what would bring this butterfly I had to correct the wrong definition 5, one of yours, and you say you want a serious site, so serious about the definition, see a reformed, very grateful.

27.10.2013 19:49, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis cerasana / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 19:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

27.10.2013 19:47, Sergei Kotov:

By the way, this pic is the same larva that #10967, maybe there body is seen better? Then again, it's not a distinctive antifeature that it's resting in fern. It might have been thrown there from its food plant with a windflaw. Such happens quite often. I've got another supposition. Can this be Lymantria dispar?

27.10.2013 19:46, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

27.10.2013 19:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pandemis heparana / Vasiliy Feoktistov Pandemis cerasana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 19:45, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pandemis heparana / Vasiliy Feoktistov Pandemis cerasana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 19:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It Epiphile orea!

27.10.2013 19:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pandemis cerasana / Vitaly Gumenuk Pandemis heparana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 19:42, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pandemis cerasana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov Pandemis heparana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pandemis cerasana / Vitaly Gumenuk Pandemis heparana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 19:39, Sergei Kotov:

And as to whether Agonopterix arenella ???

27.10.2013 19:37, Sergei Kotov:

Handsome!

27.10.2013 19:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

27.10.2013 19:37, Sergei Kotov:

ObviousHypomecis roboraria!

27.10.2013 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Until inaccurate set: time will tell.

27.10.2013 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica bechina / Tentatively identified / Lev Bely.

27.10.2013 19:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

very hairy, so hairy for this species in the net did not find (even taking into account that this is the first age), because of the hairy little visible body, a figure that resembles a kind, under which he diaper rash, a caterpillar sitting on a fern that is not fodder plant, a certain kind.But the glitch is, Vasily vsegone have more views.

27.10.2013 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Colias croceus / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb.

27.10.2013 19:33, Sergei Kotov:

Agriphila tristella- a cautious assumption

27.10.2013 19:28, Sergei Kotov:

well, so be it

27.10.2013 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

just a guess, thank you, butterfly heavily worn, it is better to be uncertain, to be a good expert on moths and specifically on Eupithecia, that would identify at least inaccurate.

27.10.2013 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UP

27.10.2013 19:27, Sergei Kotov:

Agriphila selasella

27.10.2013 19:24, Sergei Kotov:

LathParadarisa consonaria

27.10.2013 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eupterote naessigi / Confidently identified / Male / Lev Bely.

27.10.2013 19:15, Sergei Kotov:

Well, just do not like it, then let it remain as it is. And what you do not like, if not a secret?

27.10.2013 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

27.10.2013 19:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is a glitch, the definition of the form there, and kind of not. (definition, I do not like :()

27.10.2013 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Bunaea alcinoe / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 18:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calamotropha paludella / Confidently identified / Masha Gill.

27.10.2013 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Imbrasia truncata / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 18:50, Sergei Kotov:

Pandemis cerasana- this is just a conservative assumption for the ultimate truth does not pretend. Source: http://insectamo.ru/micro/124-mikrocheshuekrylye/tortricidae/1634-pandemis-cerasana

27.10.2013 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just I noticed shifting. This picture is my take of that: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22519

27.10.2013 18:43, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, Masha law isCalamotropha paludella.

27.10.2013 18:41, Sergei Kotov:

Eupithecia pusillata- this is just a conservative assumption for the ultimate truth does not pretend. Source: http: //insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1003-eupithecia-pusillata

27.10.2013 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Eugene Karolinskiy.

27.10.2013 18:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orophila diotima / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.10.2013 18:37, Sergei Kotov:

I do not Basil, but I will answer. Yes, Alexander, you understand correctly. In the "Definition of a kind" must be specified not me, but Eugene Karolinska.

27.10.2013 18:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agriphila straminella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 18:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, as I understand it, the first proper definition of Eugene did Caroline, Sergei Kotov, he confirmed.

27.10.2013 18:30, Sergei Kotov:

Agriphila straminella- this is just a conservative assumption for the ultimate truth does not pretend. Source: http://insectamo.ru/micro/106-mikrocheshuekrylye/crambidae/1728-agriphila-straminella

27.10.2013 18:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma lutea / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiommata maera / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 18:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips viola / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 18:15, Sergei Kotov:

Spilosoma lutea

27.10.2013 18:14, Sergei Kotov:

Lasiommata maera

27.10.2013 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergei! Stop whining like a woman. Ugly already, right. Odёrnuli so-shakes on mustache!

27.10.2013 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lycia hirtaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 18:10, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo -Lasiommata maera. Note the date of capture.

27.10.2013 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eduza so eduza.

27.10.2013 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pontia edusa / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 18:07, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo -Spilosoma lutea.

27.10.2013 18:03, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo -Spilarctia luteum.

27.10.2013 18:03, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo -Spilarctia lutea.

27.10.2013 17:59, Sergei Kotov:

Vasily wrong. It is the most commonPontia edusa. Source: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Pontia_Edusa (pay special attention to the head of the caterpillar!)

27.10.2013 17:50, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "showered slippers," but I will say that in this photo stopudovo caterpillarLycia hirtaria. Source: http://insectamo.ru/hete/91-hete/geometridae/1073-lycia-hirtaria

27.10.2013 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips xylosteana / Vitaly Gumenuk Archips oporana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips xylosteana / Vitaly Gumenuk Archips oporana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips crataegana / Vitaly Gumenuk Archips oporana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 17:32, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips crataegana / Vitaly Gumenuk Archips oporana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Archips crataegana / Vitaly Gumenuk Archips oporana / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 17:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

People just Get to know some simple editing such as ACDSee Pro 6 (a program fee, but each key locks can always choose): bit with photos poshamanil and get completely fit for site quality even with dish soap :) Also not a photographer (more catch ).

27.10.2013 16:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I touched up a bit after the geography :)

27.10.2013 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

27.10.2013 16:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

fear of "stones" - a cure for mistakes :)

27.10.2013 16:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectropis crepuscularia / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera baulus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

27.10.2013 16:40, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that now I will mercilessly "stoned", but I will say that in this photo -Ectropis crepuscularia. Click on the picture to enlarge - and all at once will fall into place.

27.10.2013 15:59, Sergei Kotov:

I have already voiced their position on this issue, but I will repeat it again.
Generally neopredeolennymi I suggest to consider the following:
1) When it is impossible to determine even before the race, and in some cases up to the family.2) When in doubt between a very large number of options (5 - 10 or more options)
I believe that transferring to the ill-defined, you can (and should) in the case where there is any doubt in the two - three approximately equivalent versions. Transferred to a photo in the form which is still more likely.For example, if you know that the butterfly in the photo is still largely similar to the one option rather than another. Or if you know that one of the two similar species is more common and occurs much more frequently than others.

27.10.2013 15:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ptycholoma imitator / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

27.10.2013 15:51, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Eugene Karolinskiy.

27.10.2013 15:50, Shamil Murtazin:

Q and simple and complex simultaneously.
This subject is beginning to stir in the brain after reading the correspondence about the quality of the photo.
I was confused recommendation to photograph without flash. For almost all of my photos are made with it.
On the original site of TK welcome photos (by speculative priority):
1.The new species, not shown in the photo on the website.
2. Angle, feature type, unusual shape / color.
3. With some artistic value. (Super, with elements of the landscape, etc.)
And the more insignificant the question of quality, the higher the priority. Photos of the new type can be any as long as it was possible to understand exactly how this is kind.Lets wishes on this issue, because he never superfotograf) Claims (possible) are available, but not decorated / do not speak.

27.10.2013 15:44, Sergei Kotov:

Photographed in the same place at the same day, and these: http: //lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22347 and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22346. There is a suspicion that this is the same butterfly.
In short,Polyommatus icarusit.

27.10.2013 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

NotMarpesia beraniahour?

27.10.2013 15:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Marpesia zerynthia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.10.2013 15:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chasminodes albonitens / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 14:59, Irina Nikulina:

The only species of the genus Oreta, occurring in the Russian Far East.

27.10.2013 14:55, Sergei Kotov:

The same butterfly exhibited a year ago at molbiole in "Seaside reports."
In short,Chasminodes albonitensit.

27.10.2013 14:52, Irina Nikulina:

Evgeny, Yury, thanks. I'm about to agree with Evgeny about Illiberis hyalina. Yury, maybe Y. A. Chistyakov will reply to you later. As for 11 species, they are spread through whole Far East (according to Synev), just Illiberis rotundata isn't distributed outside of eastern Amur region, thus I wrote about 10 species in Primorye.

27.10.2013 14:49, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, I would like to ask for clarification of certain points.
"but the quality !!!! and do not want to improve their skills," and so shall eat. '"
I do not understand what you need from me is impossible. Who says I do not want to improve their ability to take pictures? Very I want. But this is not done immediately.For the development of photography takes time, and it is desirable to do so under someone's guidance rather than stew in their own juice. I do not even many of the most basic concepts and rules of photography I do not know! And besides, I have a bad camera is suitable for macro photography, you do this to me I said.In addition, many has been criticized me that I use the flash. But excuse me, how to give it, I currently have no idea. Just a flash I get a photo, in which at least drawing butterflies somehow, but it is clear. When I shoot without a flash, it turns out that something is not imaginable.Photos obtained through chur so dark and vague, that it is difficult to understand what kind of butterfly they depict. Many people recommend shooting in daylight. But what it means in the "daylight"? If I try to take pictures during the day, it still turns very dark and blurry.Do I have to go out in the sun? But, forgive me, for me it is very difficult, because I live in a city apartment. Such are the cases. If you tell me what specific measures can be taken to improve the quality of the photos I will be very grateful."A lot of interesting and banal forms (which no one puts)"
And what are the specific types (of me laid out) you will find interesting, let me ask you. I believe that there is nothing interesting there. Moreover, I consider the area their uninteresting and utterly useless in entomological terms.All that is there to be studied, have already learned. I am, if you want to know all the powers attaching to quickly move away somewhere else. Still worse than this is unlikely to be.
Here and now I consider it appropriate to explain why so hurry up with the definition of their butterflies on molbiole. I just graduated from university this year.Recently I got a job on a specialty. November 5 go to work. So, up to this number of EVERYTHING that can be identified by the appearance of the genitals without cooking should be determined. I planned a very busy schedule, when going to work, time to do summer camp almost will not. So I'm in a hurry.BUT note I expose only those (as I believe) copies of which can be determined by appearance. Hopeless not exhibited. Scoop and moths of the bad groups, is determined only by the preparation of the genitals (Acronicta cuspis / tridens / psi, Heliothis viriplaca / adaucta, Hoplodrina sp., Amphipoea sp., Hydraecia sp., Mesapamea sp., Oligia sp., Mesoligia sp., Conistra vaccinii / ligula, Mniotype adusta / bathensis, Mythimna pallens / impura / straminea, Diarsia rubi / florida, Euxoa sp. from the scoop and many Eupithecia sp.of moths) in the winter, I sent to Moscow for the determination of Sviridov. I already agreed with him about it. But those who are definable in appearance, it is necessary to dismantle as much as possible as soon as possible to the beginning of November.
"I treat you with respect :)"
In light of recent events quite not sure :(.

27.10.2013 14:06, Alex Dumchus:

Marpesia zerynthia, synonym coresia

27.10.2013 14:05, Alex Dumchus:

Math, Mapresia coresia

27.10.2013 14:01, Alex Dumchus:

Laparus doris ??

27.10.2013 14:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Siproeta stelenes / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.10.2013 14:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dryas iulia / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.10.2013 13:58, Alex Dumchus:

Eryphanis ...

27.10.2013 13:55, Alex Dumchus:

Dryas julia

27.10.2013 13:52, Alex Dumchus:

Marpisia coresia

27.10.2013 13:51, Alex Dumchus:

Marpesia ...

27.10.2013 13:50, Alex Dumchus:

Siproeta stelenes

27.10.2013 13:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Just neighing over the quality of your photos. Offended anyone thought.

27.10.2013 13:20, Peter Khramov:

Well begun ...People, well, how much is already possible to explain that all these insults on the Internet - a kindergarten? Dmitri, the wretched quality of your pictures illustrate the many species on this site, what do you still need proof that they need a site?Well, yes, it would be nice if you had a better shot, but such foty that you upload, it is still better than nothing, because many kinds of online ph-existent. None.In addition, I remind everyone that the situation when the last time on the site almost removed downloadable images, time associated with delay implementation of the mechanism of putting points shooting / fishing maps. When finish it - some foty removed (absolutely unremarkable, includinggeography), and some will go to the section "photo itself is not very interesting, a lot of the same angle in the best quality, but the photo left, because illustrates the geo point finds species. " Perhaps such foty be somehow separated from the core, but they are still needed.

27.10.2013 13:15, Peter Khramov:

Guys, if you would like to discuss the very moving subj (not concerning this very pic), please welcome to a special thread http://lepidoptera.pro/community/17182

27.10.2013 13:14, Peter Khramov:

Guys, if you want to discuss the very moving principles (not concerning this very pic), let's organize it in a separate thread http://lepidoptera.pro/community/17182.

27.10.2013 13:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

After the words of Alexander will no longer spread the miserable picture quality. Well, I'm not a photographer.

27.10.2013 13:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Adhemarius gannascusuntil about

27.10.2013 13:13, Peter Khramov:

Comments concerning the relationship Modera and user moved to a separate topic: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/17183

27.10.2013 13:09, Peter Khramov:

If someone who did not understand, someone who had hurt someone with someone not disagree on a particular issue, and fundamentally, by the behavior - let's deal with these questions in this topic. Where there meets both abstract argument, let the topic (or open a new one in this section) and give a link to it.I stand a couple of posts and Alexander Sergei Kotov Zhakova of photos here.

27.10.2013 13:07, Peter Khramov:

On the pages of some of the photons in the comments sparked controversy on the topic - what are the options considered and inaccurate determination to carry wilted, respectively, and which are generally regarded as uncertain."Where is the line?" To flaming pages of photographs propose issues related to the transfer of ideology as such and not specific fotami discuss this topic.
Examples ph, where this question is raised: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22901 http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/15824

27.10.2013 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, you misunderstand the processes taking place on site. And ask for the impossible: 1. duplicate message is desirable only when passed a considerable time, measured in days, weeks and months :). 2.Patience, moderators work to the extent possible, as well as on all the other sites, and from your determination to transfer part may take considerable time, one does not see someone not sure. And the definition goes into the story, and in this case, is appropriate to recall that the definition is. 3.I personally am not going to answer each of your post (I do not always happen on the site, I do not know the correct answer, I'm not interested in the issue, etc.) If I see the correct definition, I bear in determining if a mistake, I'm writing about it, too, if I'm not competent in this form or may be several solutions, I ignore, and I will do so, and further, it is my right to you :) this will have to be measured :).I do not like the quality of the photos that you post on mobiole, a lot of interesting and banal forms (which no one puts), but the quality !!!! and do not want to improve their skills, "and so shall eat."Exhibiting on the definition sometimes banal and simple types, and define complex here, it does not get mobiol where you define for a specific person, here you define for the site, which is viewed by thousands of people and they are perfect to watch the inaccuracy years.Please write the definition as sure it is correct (may be wrong all), not about looks. I treat you with respect :). Peter, please suffered two recent post on this species, a separate discussion thread.

27.10.2013 12:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

One wishes to move a little, and my opinion is prezhdnemu: several options. to transfer photos without your expert in this group and is familiar with the fauna of East Kazakhstan, personally, I will not.

27.10.2013 12:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Doxocopa agathina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 12:29, Sergei Kotov:

So, maybe only two options: Polyommatus icarus or Polyommatus thersites, no middle ground. Plus, you yourself wrote that "Icarus, is also a good option." Based on this, I want to define this in the butterfly Polyommatus icarus. And you do not mind, judging by your post, written below, a human moderator you did not exist. What it is now changed?

27.10.2013 12:29, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, ready.

27.10.2013 12:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Doxocopa agathina

27.10.2013 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica viola / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica viola / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 12:22, Peter Khramov:

All it is, is only a "special" in this case, the same ought to be replaced by "species"; -)

27.10.2013 12:17, Peter Khramov:

UNDERLOAD one file: -) Now all the rules, or you can press the button first, then write where the cursor is established between the tags, or first drive text, then select the desired station and press the button - the selected text will be framed tags. In general, all as in typical forums, but without unnecessary in this case bbkoda.

27.10.2013 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orophila diotima / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Orophila diotima / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

27.10.2013 12:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK

27.10.2013 12:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

let it be a subspecies

27.10.2013 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah. So I think adding a separate species or not (to diotima drag).

27.10.2013 12:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Justify, or just want to move wherever it not be?

27.10.2013 12:13, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, I duplicated the message, because I thought that was ignored. I wrote a commentary on the two butterflies, one photo you move, the second - why it is not. Although it is still written, that everything is correct. Let's agree (in the future) as follows. You will not ignore me.If my definition is correct, move the photo to the right place, if not - you told me it right, in the face saying, but do not ignore. I think it would be better everything: me and you.
And the fact that the attack - is the best way of defense, it is undoubtedly yes. I am already familiar with this from their own experience.

27.10.2013 12:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Orophila diotima cecidas?

27.10.2013 12:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

27.10.2013 12:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitri, an hour is not a subspecies of: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/58048? I do not know, whether to add a separate species.

27.10.2013 12:03, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anthophila fabriciana / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 12:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

The attack, the best way to defense? In this case, all right, in my opinion. :)

27.10.2013 11:58, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that inevitably will be subjected to tough destruction by Alexander Zhakova, but still venture on his head to say that in this photo - Anthophila fabriciana

27.10.2013 11:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

The reliable website is not one with little of not identified pics but instead many properly identified. You read it wrong. As for some solution for not identified images, Petr can easily delete them with one-finger move whilst tentatively identified will get lost amidst thousands, especially when someone multiplies such, should pay some more attention to such IDs. :)

27.10.2013 11:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Orophila cecidas

27.10.2013 11:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eunica viola?

27.10.2013 11:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. The underside, would be .....

27.10.2013 11:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Doxocopa sp. Prior to the form would not venture.

27.10.2013 11:46, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anania lancealis / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

27.10.2013 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

EAM which is correct, right, who can argue? Only race Anania :)

27.10.2013 11:22, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that inevitably will be subjected to tough destruction by Alexander Zhakova, but still venture on his head to say that in this photo -Perinephela lancealis

27.10.2013 11:21, Sergei Kotov:

I certainly understand that inevitably will be subjected to tough destruction by Alexander Zhakova, but still venture on his head to say that in this photo -Anthophila fabriciana

27.10.2013 11:05, Sergei Kotov:

Really can't I understand why for anyway the website would need such a huge amount of photos not identified??? Once you said that you wanted to have a "reliable website". Well the site with so many not identified pics can't be "reliable" by default and even will ne-ver be-come one! That's the reason why experts run away from this website like rabbits, just because it's full of needlees and for some reason kept for centuries images of species which are not identified. This should be solved somehow. I reckon that there should be little of not identified pics, totally hopeless cases when it's impossible to ID properly even genus/family, or when there are dozen more similar species, not two—three as we have here. Rest should be solved somehow. I suggested to move this to Yponomeuta padella tentatively identified. Ok, if don't want to, please don't, let it stays in not identified for some indefinite reason and time.

27.10.2013 10:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Latin convenient and accurate, as it is the same for all regions of the country .In different places can be many different names for the same individual with Russian names and go and sometimes try to understand what is at stake. Latin, all local names are united into one. Therefore, even from the other person. Latin name of the country who sees clearly what is at stake.

27.10.2013 9:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yponomeuta malinellus / padella

27.10.2013 9:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yponomeuta malinellus / padella

27.10.2013 9:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yponomeuta malinellus / padella

27.10.2013 9:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yponomeuta malinellus / padella

27.10.2013 9:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, a bad example brought, Amphipoea, visually determined without genitals, with high probability, the tech is important habitats, and other factors. In this case, we deliberately write lies.we know that the definition of 50/50, we do not know the differences between these species (in other regions there may be more than 2), and should be the premise on which we transfer photos to this species, but not another, there is no why. There are wonderful pictures Gumenyuk Vitali, who laid on the site of about 3,000 photos.But to its definition, I am very cautious when bvbochki were not identified in the mobiole. Now I will very carefully refers to the definitions of Sergei Kotov, by the fact that it requires to transfer photos without defining what a sight. :) Struggling with a folder "Type not defined", do not fight it.Although I think that these kinds of photo concrete can be and let these photos are on the pages of the species. but not those that demanded :))) Kotov.

27.10.2013 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, inserting tags in the selected text, and clicking on the button at the top of messages has not worked? Something I do not understand how to use these buttons.

27.10.2013 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Site on Asian pavlinoglazki: http://wildsilkmoth-indonesia.com/index.html

27.10.2013 7:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, remove any of these types: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/38987 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/9106
It is not good when certain types of synonyms :) There are people rightly said.

27.10.2013 6:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

27.10.2013 6:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The more volatile it as the devil in drag :) accurate.

27.10.2013 5:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Parthenocissus was there. As a caterpillar, it Illiberis consimilis Leech, 1898 I can not judge. Maybe. In any case, the fact that naryl by the nature of it is only considered normal. At al. Species or rare or very rare or isolated finds.

27.10.2013 4:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Pardon for my carelessness, I mistook II for 2... there are actually 11 species. Which are: 1. Illiberis rotundata; 2. I. pruni : 3. I. kardakoffi ; 4. I. kuprijanovi ; 5. I. assimilis ; 6. I. cybele; 7. I. ulmivora ; 8. I. psychina ; 9. I. consimilis ; 10. I. hyalina ; and 11. I. tenuis.
Evgeny, you seem to be right. I checked black-and-white photo of Illiberis hyalina, collate it to Ira's pic and it fits most due to its venation.

27.10.2013 3:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Judging by images in Efetov's book, this is I. hyalina. The book is available here: http://www.lepidoptera.crimea.ua/articles/Efetov_2005_Zygaenidae_Crimea.djvu.
Yet I'm far from talking professionally as for this case.

27.10.2013 2:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I will answer as experienced indianets :) - it. There is no other such.

27.10.2013 2:54, Sergei Kotov:

I agree, I admit my guilt, I hurried. Again, I did not consider the factor of similar species. Butterfly on the photo may turn out to be Yponomeuta padella.
In this case, I suggest to proceed as follows. Move all the same the whole group of photos in the ill-defined Yponomeuta malinellus.As on this site has been used this practice, and I see no reason to not use it again. A typical example - the kind of scoops Amphipoea. These three species, all of which, strictly speaking, they differ only in the genitals. However, on this site we have them transferred to a still ill-defined or Amphipoea fucosa Amphipoea oculea.I propose in this case (and in all such cases) to do so.
So, I suggest (not even insist) to move this photo in ill-defined

27.10.2013 2:52, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, if not difficult, do not use an empty string in comments, they are visually strong tear text (the difference between the portions of text in a visual commentary becomes greater than the difference between the individual commentaries). And in fact, yes, the people, such cases have been and probably will be (about ill-defined or vague at all).Who thinks that?

27.10.2013 2:50, Peter Khramov:

So if you use in a comment such construction species name then you give a link on the very species description page on the website (in case the species is catalogued), in this case it will properly linked as Danaus plexippus, or if there's no yet such species in the catalogue, the name will appear in italic font. It's really handy and I suggest to use it often. There's also some specifics, if there are three comments on the page and they all contain such construction, this looks bad and reads even worse. So let's agree that we use this species name construction in the first comment and then just plain species name, no any @. Exception: when there's a huge discussion with lots of comments, there's some sense in using again this construction some time after as the first link goes down deep. All this about the situation when we talk about one species. If many different species mentioned, then many constructions could be used, even close to each other :--)

27.10.2013 2:45, Sergei Kotov:

I agree, I admit my guilt, I hurried. Again, I did not consider the factor of similar species. Butterfly on the photo may turn out to be Yponomeuta padella.

In this case, I suggest to proceed as follows. Move all the same the whole group of photos in the ill-defined Yponomeuta malinellus.As on this site has been used this practice, and I see no reason to not use it again. A typical example - the kind of scoops Amphipoea. These three species, all of which, strictly speaking, they differ only in the genitals. However, on this site we have them transferred to a still ill-defined or Amphipoea fucosa Amphipoea oculea.I propose in this case (and in all such cases) to do so.

So, I suggest (not even insist) to move this photo in ill-definedYponomeuta malinellus.

27.10.2013 2:45, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus- in ill-defined

27.10.2013 2:45, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus- in ill-defined

27.10.2013 2:45, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus- in ill-defined

27.10.2013 2:44, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus- in ill-defined

27.10.2013 2:42, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus icarusin the ill-defined

27.10.2013 2:38, Yuri Semejkin:

The family Zygaenidae in the crust. Bp. They include 5 subfamilies. In the Russian Far East representatives inhabit 3 subfamilies: Procridinae (20 species), Chalcosinae (1 species), and Zygaeninae (3 types).
Go ahead. Trans. and the back. KRL. transparent with clearly visible veins. There are two types: Illiberis rotundata and I. pruni (to insects of the Far East Rosii tom5, Part 5).
And it seems everything. Before my kind do not get.To determine the type of shots needed forelegs. The difference in these species in the presence or absence of the pineal gland. Ie I. rotundata have epiphysis is, and is characterized by the absence of I. pruni epifiza.-it is also said in the Zoological Journal of the Amur IV (4), 372-379, 2012. author VV Dubatolov
Ira writes that the wings are transparent.

27.10.2013 2:15, Peter Khramov:

Thus, section "Community" is enriched with basic functionality forums, while fully preserving the integration section with comments and photos to the species. We've had a lot of comments to the pictures, comment and species, but common themes are rarely open (much more was simply publishing news).Users can now open their topics in the thematic sections of the site - and the classification of taxa, and macro photographs, fishing and collecting, a functional site, as well as to discuss issues related to the no butterflies - in a special section, "the smoking room."Most of the old order, I scattered on vnovobrazovannym sections. Save and tape to the kinds of comments, photographs, open discussions and subscriptions. Hardcore users still have access to shared tape all the comments on this site.
And yet.And now the comments to the species fotam and topics, as well as the creation of new themes you can use sub-headings in bold, italics, and insert images from other sites. Just do not overdo with clumsy clearance: -)
Welcome to the new Community and welcome your feedback and new themes.
ZYIf you have units in the community, and displayed a wry look small, or if something is wrong, just full refresh the page (Ctrl + F5 in most browsers).

27.10.2013 2:07, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, please share in the subject experience of those who use nets of a fabric that she was completely unsuitable for catching butterflies. Ie something like a "rag used such and such, is not suitable because of that, replaced on this, and it was much better." But first and foremost interested in still is not what it came, and the one that is tested, but is not suitable.

27.10.2013 2:00, Peter Khramov:

In this topic, you can publicly express their gratitude to site members.In the first post, as is customary in such cases, I would like to thank all the contributors to the site for their contributions, and all visitors of the site - for attention to it: -) Well, recent events - thank Vasily and Alexander Feoktistov Zhakov which among other things is actively involved in the transfer of photons to the species, Sergei Kotov, who,despite some errors, -) actively took up work to identify species on the photographs, Alexander Dumchusu for regular replenishment site Lepidoptera exotic Svetlana Schavelinoy for what does not forget for the photos to open new topics in the Community, Dmitry Pozhogin,who heroically fighting for the purity of rows in exotic taxa. And - wait for all missing for good reasons and drips on the conscience - the lack of disrespect: -)

27.10.2013 1:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, how do you distinguish Yponomeuta malinellus and Yponomeuta padella?

27.10.2013 0:02, Peter Khramov:

For that I love Japanese photosites, is because they do not do not care users outside the Japanese language.

26.10.2013 23:58, Peter Khramov:

Old announced the change of algorithm download just the time to clean up, hang in its place a message on the need to possibly accurate indication of geography.

26.10.2013 23:39, Irina Nikulina:

Lev, hi!) Long time you haven't treated us with something good in the blog) No, alas, haven't yet reached Japan, though it's just near at hand from our Far East which I visited again last September. Quite interesting species there indeed. I like to surf Japanese websites, they take good shots, the style is absolutely different, lots of similar species close to our Far Eastern lepidoptera! (e.g. http://www.j-nature.jp/butterfly/)

26.10.2013 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Dime, see it or not?

26.10.2013 23:24, Irina Nikulina:

For a long time it does not rest this interesting butterfly, only once greeted in the Far East. It is, I think, from pestryanok Illiberis (which dwells in Primorye 10 species), but what kind? Maybe someone will tell? Here, the Japanese illustrated 5 species found in Primore- assimilis, pruni, psychina, consimilis, tenuis - http://www.jpmoth.org/Zygaenidae/Procridinae/Illiberis.html
But the picture 5 more species - Illiberis kuprijanovi, Illiberis kardakoffi, Illiberis cybele, Illiberis hyaline and Illiberis ulmivora - I can not find. (In the picture the wings turned out not very natural, in fact they are transparent)

26.10.2013 23:20, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily's first comment is confusing, still... Yury, I think this is larva of Illiberis genus, you've got 10 species of this genus in Primorye, and rather common. I reckon this is Illiberis consimilis Leech, 1898. I was looking for photos of my specimen on Japanese websites and also checked curious pics of this genus. Have a look, here's nearly yours, only poorer shot) http://www.jpmoth.org/Zygaenidae/Procridinae/Illiberis_consimilis.html. Also there is a publication by Japanese authors, «Larva and hostplants of Illiberis consimilis Leech Zygaenidae, Procridinae from Aichi Prefecture, Japan» where 2 food plants of this genus mentioned, Vitis coignetiae Pulliat ex Planch and Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Siebold & Zucc.) Planch. Maybe it crawled on Aristolochia just by accident?) Waiting for an expert opinion!

26.10.2013 22:42, Sergei Kotov:

Agree, let's wait for Alexandr's confirmation or disproof. He's better in these.

26.10.2013 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It should be a confirmation / denial. This group "with a light hand" is usually not defined.
Wrap long wait.

26.10.2013 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sitochroa verticalis / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena minos / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena minos / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 22:09, Shamil Murtazin:

I look for other angles ...

26.10.2013 22:08, Shamil Murtazin:

?

26.10.2013 22:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Argynnis / Mihail Nyzhnikov Argynnis pandora / Igor Sakhno.

26.10.2013 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Araschnia levana / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Catocala nupta / Maxim Schwarz Catocala elocata / Dmitry Borisyuk.

26.10.2013 21:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Oh, finally they decided :)

26.10.2013 20:42, Sergei Kotov:

In this photo the same butterfly, as here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23773, but in the expanded form.

26.10.2013 20:42, Sergei Kotov:

In this photo the same butterfly, as here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23773, but in the expanded form.

26.10.2013 20:36, Sergei Kotov:

Yes you are right. The photo really Catocala elocata

26.10.2013 17:13, Dmitry Borisyuk:

Comrades experts, please see this happen to C.elocata?

26.10.2013 16:48, Sergei Kotov:

Eurema simulatrix(in the ill-defined)

26.10.2013 16:45, Sergei Kotov:

Araschnia levana

26.10.2013 16:17, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus icarusin the ill-defined

26.10.2013 16:10, Lev Bely:

Irina, have you ever been in Japan? Would be interesting to see local lepidoptera.

26.10.2013 16:07, Lev Bely:

Leo is not enough for you, white and fluffy :)

26.10.2013 15:40, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus

26.10.2013 15:40, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus

26.10.2013 15:40, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus

26.10.2013 15:39, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus

26.10.2013 15:39, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta malinellus

26.10.2013 15:35, Sergei Kotov:

Zygaena minos(in the ill-defined)

26.10.2013 15:34, Sergei Kotov:

Zygaena minos(in the ill-defined)

26.10.2013 15:06, Sergei Kotov:

Argynnis pandora

26.10.2013 14:49, Sergei Kotov:

Oleg, and where the results of the definition, since it was carried out on photographs?

26.10.2013 14:48, Sergei Kotov:

Sitochroa verticalis- a bad angle, but it seems that it is this kind.

26.10.2013 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmia pyralina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.10.2013 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmia pyralina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.10.2013 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2013 13:54, Irina Nikulina:

I suppose that Cosmia pyralina?

26.10.2013 13:53, Irina Nikulina:

Some Cosmia. I would venture to carefully prepolozhit) that Cosmia pyralina. Or, again undetectable photo?

26.10.2013 12:48, Maxim Schwarz:

Ikebana :-)

26.10.2013 12:41, Peter Khramov:

Galliry is fixed. As for the tooltips, yes, there was bug with incorrect signs on author pages. Now fixed. As for rebukes and other disputes, I'd like to say it fifth time that web messages may be reacted more expressive than real, alive ones, so please let's have some more patience and comprehension. I'm sure we're all here for similar reasons and purposes, and we're all people of reason and peace.

26.10.2013 12:37, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypomecis roboraria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 12:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

What chance for modesty, why not accurately defined? :)

26.10.2013 12:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyronia cecilia / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb.

26.10.2013 12:33, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pyronia cecilia / Confidently identified / Leon Ortlieb.

26.10.2013 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrita autumnata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 12:29, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrita autumnata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 12:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2013 12:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2013 12:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2013 12:23, Sergei Kotov:

Oh, no, not exactly Operophtera fagata. Epirrita autumnatait.

26.10.2013 12:23, Sergei Kotov:

Oh, no, not exactly Operophtera fagata. Epirrita autumnatait.

26.10.2013 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergei, just need to be more attentive. And opened the photo to see what is written on the top. Glitches occur regularly and there is nothing supernatural in this: I hope Peter and fix this.This glitch: when you move the cursor to the "Gallery" there is the following: "Gallery photos and pictures of butterflies" is also necessary fixes removing the letter "and" in the first word.

26.10.2013 12:01, Sergei Kotov:

Vasily, so it was finally moved? Just I saw Ivan Pristrem's page and there when you move your cursor over its picture, there is a sign appears "species is not identified". Thus I said. I should've checked the very species photo page if it had the ID. So I didn't, my pardon.
Anyway here's some clear bug about this dyssynchrony between the identified species on its photo page and allegedly "not identified" on the author page. Should be fixed.

Also pity you consider my comments as rebukes solely. I just wanted to fix the species, maybe said it kinda harsh. So it turns out as always.

26.10.2013 11:50, Sergei Kotov:

The butterfly is very shabby, but it is clear that this Hypomecis sp. Although attrition instance, wavy outer sash can be seen, and on the basis of a butterfly is more consistent with H. roboraria.
Result -Hypomecis roboraria(in the ill-defined)

26.10.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phragmatobia fuliginosa / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lasiocampa quercus / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 11:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.10.2013 11:41, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Xanthorhoe spadicearia Epirrhoe alternata.

26.10.2013 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ethmia pusiella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 11:38, Sergei Kotov:

Defined correctly, it can be accurate.

26.10.2013 11:37, Sergei Kotov:

No Xanthorhoe spadicearia here does not even smell.
Epirrhoe alternatait.

26.10.2013 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And where it should be if not in theEublemma minutata? Others do not see the definitions. Something I do not understand the essence of the next collision :)

26.10.2013 11:22, Sergei Kotov:

Why has not yet been moved? It is now four months has been determined. And do not blame in this case the employment moderators. First, for the past four months it could be vouchsafed and transfer, and secondly, the site has three moderator.

26.10.2013 11:18, Sergei Kotov:

Lasiocampa quercus

26.10.2013 11:17, Sergei Kotov:

Phragmatobia fuliginosa

26.10.2013 11:17, Sergei Kotov:

Ethmia pusiella (source: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Ethmia_Pusiella)

26.10.2013 11:15, Sergei Kotov:

Thank you and on this one.

26.10.2013 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

After another assumption:Acronicta auricoma?

26.10.2013 9:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Out accomplished. From mistakes no one is safe :)

26.10.2013 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Aporia crataegi / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

26.10.2013 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotia nisella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

26.10.2013 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotia nisella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

26.10.2013 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epinotia nisella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

26.10.2013 9:48, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parastichtis suspecta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.10.2013 9:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

26.10.2013 9:47, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parastichtis suspecta / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.10.2013 9:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

I will be humble and answer carefully, such Hecatera dysodea I have not seen this butterfly with this I have not synonymous, I would not began to define and transfer it to Hecatera dysodea my hand does not rise :)

26.10.2013 8:59, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caradrina clavipalpis / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

26.10.2013 6:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lamoria anella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.10.2013 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lamoria anella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.10.2013 6:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lamoria anella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.10.2013 6:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MOVED.

26.10.2013 6:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MOVED.

26.10.2013 6:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MOVED.

26.10.2013 6:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

MOVED.

26.10.2013 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.10.2013 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

26.10.2013 3:07, Sergei Kotov:

"Butterflies all Volgograd" - it is quite obvious in my opinion. Picture Exotics from this author there.

26.10.2013 3:05, Sergei Kotov:

It is necessary to move.

26.10.2013 3:04, Sergei Kotov:

It is necessary to move.

26.10.2013 3:04, Sergei Kotov:

It is necessary to move.

26.10.2013 3:04, Sergei Kotov:

It is necessary to move.

26.10.2013 3:02, Sergei Kotov:

Clear. No questions.

26.10.2013 3:00, Peter Khramov:

Sergei, because of Yuri and saith. They say that on the genitals - in one pile, and that is not the genitals, but so far only to a genus or even a superspecies taxon - those in another.

26.10.2013 2:59, Sergei Kotov:

I was already e-mailed Synev's book by Alexandr. Question closed. Now another bothers me. Moreover, looking at this, http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3535, he's not quite precise in IDs (which anyway doesn't derogate his worth). Hecatera dysodea isn't mentioned in Synev's book in Amur region. Which is still not a criterion, as it turns out. I wonder now if I was right this is Hecatera dysodea or not? The ID should be approved or controverted.

26.10.2013 2:57, Sergei Kotov:

I was already e-mailed Synev's book by Alexandr. Question closed. Now another bothers me. Moreover, looking at this, http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3535, he's not quite precise in IDs (which anyway doesn't derogate his worth). Hecatera dysodea isn't mentioned in Synev's book in Amur region. Which is still not a criterion, as it turns out. I wonder now if I was right this is Hecatera dysodea or not? The ID should be approved or controverted.

26.10.2013 2:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lithostege griseata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

26.10.2013 2:48, Sergei Kotov:

Transfer is necessary, how long ago determined.

26.10.2013 2:45, Sergei Kotov:

Ethmia pusiella(source: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Ethmia_Pusiella)

26.10.2013 2:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Sergei. In fact, the book Sineva offer online http://www.life-nature.ru/?name=Book&bid=4058851

26.10.2013 2:31, Sergei Kotov:

"and perhaps there will be more time to cool spices and something will go from the category of race, in the category of view, without any cooking" - it does not happen. Either members of the group and all the experts are always determined only on the genitals or not. One of the two. There is no third.

26.10.2013 2:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! I wanted to remind you that should not be lumped together those just identified to genus and Those Where determination of the kind made to date only the genitals. They should be isolated separately.Then consider them to be more convenient and may appear over time steeper spices and something will go from the category of race, in the category of view, without any cooking.

26.10.2013 2:20, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, need your authoritative opinion:Hecatera dysodeait or not?

26.10.2013 2:05, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, your output.

26.10.2013 1:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

yes it happens accidentally pressed, I think so :)

26.10.2013 1:33, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, the signature "definition of species" is given for the sake of brevity. In fact, this infa not about who is to determine the form, and that those who had information that at this picture, this look to the site. And yes, it can only be zaregalsya user.If it is determined by someone else, it is a good habit to write about it in the comments or in the notes to the picture (so now and make some of our authors).

26.10.2013 1:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Remove only need low-quality photos. All others may eventually decide. This is especially true remote regions, will open a new life and a good sprinkling definition :)

26.10.2013 1:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

The complex case that has long defined Pekarsky photos, and according to the rules of this site, I put the definition of Sergei Kotov. I wanted to put two, this was difficult.

26.10.2013 1:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

So sometimes I do not know whether to laugh, cry or whether :)

26.10.2013 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Cnethodonta grisescens.

26.10.2013 1:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 1:18, Sergei Kotov:

"I just did not understand. What is so amused by Sergei" - very much fretting error turned out in this case.

26.10.2013 1:17, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, first of all, I apologize for the excessive sharpness.

"And now a very complex case" - but with these let us disagree. maxima and distinctive appearance is markedly different from other members of the genus Lygephila

26.10.2013 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

For you do not ugonishsya :)

26.10.2013 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

26.10.2013 1:14, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Autographa excelsa / Igor Sakhno Macdunnoughia confusa / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 1:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lygephila maxima / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

26.10.2013 1:10, Irina Nikulina:

Excuse me, is examined and sent comments, it is already determined. Only here I do not understand. that so much amused Sergei (Apparently, he is rarely wrong)

26.10.2013 1:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, do not dissemble, I have never scolded, reprimanded, bantered, indignant, taught, yes, but not abused :) I do not blame you for that. And now a very complicated case, this image is determined in mobiole Oleg Pekarsky http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t523212.html God forgive me, Peter, try to insert in the definition of the two, what happens? and nothing will have no room Pekarsky :(

26.10.2013 1:07, Irina Nikulina:

Igor, but it is not a drop Macdunnoughia confusa?

26.10.2013 1:05, Sergei Kotov:

Yeah, you really have fun here. Macdunnoughia confusait.
For a long time so I do not laugh. Lots and heartily.

26.10.2013 1:01, Sergei Kotov:

Type defined incorrectly. It is anything but not Aporia Crataegi.

26.10.2013 0:46, Igor Sakhno:

And the hair bundles of warts as well?

26.10.2013 0:45, Igor Sakhno:

Tyk, at the same Well warts, while others do not have.

26.10.2013 0:34, Irina Nikulina:

And here, by the way, and in this case, Sinev 36 region (Amursk reg.) Cnetodonta grisescens not found, but the other is not given) - as soon as it occurs and on the ter. Russian Federation. It must have been close to the neighboring 37th (south Khabar. Territory and the Jewish Autonomous Region) flew).

26.10.2013 0:23, Sergei Kotov:

I might be hardly blamed by Alexandr Zhakov, still say this is Lygephila maxima.

26.10.2013 0:00, Sergei Kotov:

Petr, thanks for the hint. Will get it in use.

25.10.2013 23:59, Sergei Kotov:

Clear. But this butterfly bicolorata quite unlike. Well, so be it. Let it remain uncertain. Maybe someone someday it will determine. Although unlikely ... I believe in it with difficulty.

25.10.2013 23:53, Irina Nikulina:

Sergei, of all Hecatera in the Amur region occurs only bicolorata. (A book on an Internet I ordered, but rarely use, t. To. Peter has correctly suggested as a site inf. Take)

25.10.2013 23:50, Peter Khramov:

It is simply an extra choice to make, to the uncertain, imprecise definition and precise definition be added to the definition superspecies taxon. Then those who are looking uncertain same, foty eyesore will not, and the new images will be views in this open.

25.10.2013 23:49, Sergei Kotov:

CorydalisCnetodonta grisescens

25.10.2013 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, it is not necessary to produce the book. The catalog on this site all the same information; -) Just choose the region (s) and the necessary taxon and all.

25.10.2013 23:45, Irina Nikulina:

Yeah, I understand) only where the criterion of exhaustion chance?) And suddenly more "cool", "monster" peep later?)) And what about the reference to the old and above should, it seems to me to discuss and solve technical. Perhaps allocating these photos separate space / section.

25.10.2013 23:40, Sergei Kotov:

Irina, if you somehow have Synev's Catalogue at hand, would you please check which Hecatera species is distributed in Amur region? Very curious. I'm not used to give up so easy! This moth should be done...

P.S. Where is possible to find this Synev's book? Everyone refers to that...

25.10.2013 23:37, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, and it is exotic to the fact of "the background"))

25.10.2013 23:33, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, about what I had in mind. And not "monsters of the universe" (this is already too much), but steep experts! :)

25.10.2013 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Irina, I think, Sergey meant that even after the photos uploaded, if the monsters of the universe expressed in that spirit, that determination is not likely to, such foty I should delete.
Q. By the way, interesting.Especially considering that for a long time expressed the wish that bind foty could not only view, but also from one side to the subspecies, and on the other - and to the genus, or even higher, if the form is unknown ...

25.10.2013 23:22, Sergei Kotov:

No questions.

25.10.2013 23:20, Irina Nikulina:

Sergey, but dysodea east region 24 does not occur (for Sinev) in the Amur region and it is not (see. The place of shooting)

25.10.2013 23:18, Peter Khramov:

And the truth is exotic from the foreground to the rear)

25.10.2013 23:08, Sergei Kotov:

Hecatera dysodea

25.10.2013 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Pseudimbrasia deyrollei / Tentatively identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So too I suspect. I stand in inaccurate.

25.10.2013 22:56, Irina Nikulina:

A little bit of beautiful butterflies of "exotic region") Autumn gatherings Far East Indian admirals against the backdrop of the Golden Horn Bay (again, Waters)) and the famous cable-stayed bridge Golden constructed in Vladivostok for the APEC summit 2012.
Very fond of Vanessa indica autumn to feed on the flowers of the genus Saussurea.(Often, they are joined and Vanessa cardui, such images also available)

25.10.2013 22:55, Sergei Kotov:

YoungLasiocampa quercus(Linnaeus, 1758). Is not it so?

25.10.2013 22:42, Sergei Kotov:

A dead, driedPhragmatobia fuliginosa(Linnaeus, 1758).
No luck poor thing. :(

25.10.2013 22:40, Sergei Kotov:

A dead, dried Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Linnaeus, 1758).
No luck poor thing. :(

25.10.2013 21:48, Irina Nikulina:

I'm not sure that in a few days I can participate in the discussion on this topic. so little I say today.I have here a note-issue (mainly, Sergei ... and to all who are interested in this topic)) - as well as the author of photos, which are the bulk of his are not experts, entomologists, should know in advance what pictures they should put on the site, and what - no?I seldom put in vague picture, I try to do a lot of work beforehand, by definition, involving all the -VA and methods), and yet, of course, knowledge and capabilities are not enough.But certainly I can not pre-suppose that the provided with the hope of the help of experts photo will "butterfly of hopelessly indeterminate photo groups", and therefore the very picture gets into the category of "unnecessary site."Well, is not given to the layman is to guess, sorry!"It is obvious that in these photos butterfly NEVER be determined" (I'm sorry - it is obvious to whom? Sometimes, encountering strange butterfly, try to remove it without disturbing (still Macro 1-10sm conducted from a distance), and there's not think about it, that she was not beautiful enough or 'unaesthetic site "sits).And you hope that soon with the help of your overall know her name) ... and beautiful with well-known types of me "in the bins" tens of GB, can be infinitely set - but what for them as site?And more ... Sergey (also no offense) - I think that so many exclamation marks (often in your posts) a little too much), they are emotionally overwhelmed even lined reasonable arguments. All of us people here seem to be adequate and are able to hear a quiet tone.And, to be honest, I even felt a little guilty myself)) for such a foolish statement. Well at least for the quality of the photo I answer his head))
As for returning to the uncertain ... When I first came here, Al. Zhakov said in the discussion here http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 21279 "I want to, and this site was a serious" - and I agreed with him then and I continue to wish for it now)

25.10.2013 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, I understand that the last time you accidentally pressed or just refresh the page?

25.10.2013 20:40, Peter Khramov:

Sergei, the subject of what foty needed and what is not, has repeatedly raised the site. And yet, I think, will go up. Now I finish the new "Community", there will be forumoobraznaya part, including and a section of the photo. Let wound up there, and the topic will clarify these questions. (Will be ready in a day or two.)

25.10.2013 20:24, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, though yours, even more remains uncertain.

But in this regard, I offer to all. I suggest (even insist) on how to create a separate topic in the community (that is not flood hurl) with the aim to discuss the question: why, for what purpose do we need such a site is hopelessly undetectable photos.The word "hopeless" I understand these pictures when there is no general (even the minimum) hope that they ever determined.Why such a site need photo? In my opinion, the only thing that can justify the existence of the photos on the site - their aesthetic appeal, or in which they are made some unusual, exotic location.If successful, quality-made photo shows a beautiful butterfly, then this photograph has a right to life, even shown her butterfly determine there is absolutely no way. The latter applies, in particular, most of the photographs taken by the author Konstantin Krajewski.Many of his photos are undefined, and moreover never be identified due to the fact that they are made in a very exotic region (Guyana, river pool Kuyun). But these are the photos have a right to exist on the site, as they are made with high quality and aesthetic appeal.But there is a website and an opposite example - on mnogoh photo Khramova author Peter (Peter, no offense, because it is the truth) it is not clear on what quality photographs show not understand what kind of gray moths.And in some cases quite impossible to say (as in one of his comments quite rightly said Alexander), even what kind of family. It is obvious that in these photos butterfly NEVER be determined. They never will hang a dead weight on the website undefined infinite amount of time.It is also unclear why the website photos even of good quality, but made in the region and non-exotic (and most importantly), which shows a butterfly from a hopelessly indeterminate group photo (the same kind of Agonopterix, for example, according to Alexandra). In fact pipiski pictures do not tear and alkali they do not cook.Why are these photos need a site? What for??? Unclear….

25.10.2013 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Reason shuffling photo comments for this photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/24197

25.10.2013 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Agonopterix arenella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina Not identified.

25.10.2013 19:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agonopterix arenella / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.10.2013 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma lutea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.10.2013 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma lutea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

25.10.2013 19:07, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you, Basil. I got it. after a weekend I will go on a journey, and after two weeks pristuplyu. But the question was to Dmitry: I mean cooking procedures genitals.

25.10.2013 18:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not know whether there is, where the description, but the procedures are excellent: "Necessity is the mother of invention," as the saying goes ":)
"Galosha" Buy me in August, hozmage for soaking these klanisov: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/24016
They had zazhireno obryushko that with raznousymi often happens if the kill rate in overexposing when vapors of ethyl acetate. Keep out of gasoline should be approx.per day (depending on size). Oprobavona And this procedure and our: linden and mottled-works fine.
! IMPORTANT! Treat you only have straightened and dried butterflies so much as gasoline "dubit" insect and spread after treatment will be problematic.

25.10.2013 18:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Continued lower fasting accidentally loaded.
propinquella, some types of images are not found. And the catalog is not a dogma, new all time are. And let you prove that it is this or that kind, but I'm not that this is a misnomer.Do not rush to weigh everything, and if in doubt, say in this case, once again shift responsibility for determining the other. Here no one asks to urgently define whether not certain, over time, and the specialist will determine the right and will not pick the wrong definition.

25.10.2013 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, I correct your mistakes, and you vozmuschaeshsya, should I be indignant, and ban the wrong definition of too much for one person. Your desire to rake the pile of undetermined species is very commendable but do not do it by eye, and seems to come, experts still are not here, are not correct.There are professionals and see the error.
To begin with, I'm not an expert in this group, if I have to, I do Lvov pass, but see species differences I can, and Viger that the two Agonopterix not meet arenella. and this could be ostanovitsya.i translate their part.But looking at the catalog blue of this genus can offer for at least three kinds: ciliella, laterella,

25.10.2013 18:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, our aim is not just move from not identified to confidently identified but do it right. :) And I'll stand for this position. Let's hide emotions which impede the business. I'll give a reply now on Agonopterix on its page.

25.10.2013 18:27, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Pyrgus malvae / Confidently identified Pyrgus serratulae / Tentatively identified.

25.10.2013 17:59, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, I believe that the ill-defined Pyrgus serratulae still can move.
After all, you yourself wrote that the ill-defined transferred those instances, the cord is difficult to make a choice between several similar species. My opinion - this is the case.Do not marinate the same photo in this uncertain until the end of time ??? All the more so the case is not the most difficult (and sometimes worse - when it is not clear that even for the family).

And please give me the answer here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/24197, what are the kinds of Agonopterix which can be easily confused with views Agonopterix arenella and who live in the central part of Russia? Just wondering.

25.10.2013 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are no flight periods noticed, the rest is only your imagination as well as the location. And Sergey please less nervous, I think we've here for the same purpose to make this site better, so let's make it such :)

25.10.2013 17:18, Sergei Kotov:

Alexander, what do you say? Waiting for an answer!

25.10.2013 17:16, Sergei Kotov:

Here, IMHO, it is much easier than it sounds. The author of this butterfly was originally identified as a Carterocephalus palaemon. Period summer C. palaemon Perm - mid-May - early June. At the same time palaemon of pirgusov only fly Pyrgus serratulae. Alveus departs later - from mid-June.
So, IMHO, in the photo - Pyrgus serratulae

25.10.2013 17:16, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

25.10.2013 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catastia marginea / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.10.2013 16:59, Sergei Kotov:

First, read what I have said here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2505.
Second, what other options ??? It is not Ukraine and central Russia !!!!!!!! The fauna of butterflies, by definition, much poorer! What then there may be similar species, among which could be doubted except Agonopterix arenella (taking into account the specific location where the picture was taken !!!).To criticize is ready just in !!! And to suggest that something constructive want !!!!!!! :( :( :(
In general, it is a Agonopterix arenella, or offer other options with which this butterfly can be confused (and that those same options are met in the Kaluga region, Borovsky district).

My strength there is no longer tolerate it !!!!!!!!! ((((((((

25.10.2013 16:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, I opt for a small Permi: or Pyrgus serratulae, or Pyrgus alveus. It does not know about the local timing of the summer and spread of these species.

25.10.2013 16:52, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cosmosoma ethodaea / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 16:52, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cymothoe haynae / Confidently identified / Male / Alex Dumchus.

25.10.2013 16:51, Peter Khramov:

Alexander's your comment was, right?

25.10.2013 16:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, tell me, how do you so confidently confirm the species from such a difficult group like Agonopterix, even their AL Lviv, to determine the exact picks for cooking. :). It is notAgonopterix arenella, that lighter.

25.10.2013 16:03, Alex Dumchus:

Cymothoe haynae, male

25.10.2013 15:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Let it be Cosmosoma ethodaea

25.10.2013 15:46, Alex Dumchus:

Is there anywhere else to describe these procedures?

25.10.2013 15:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Knowledge of genetics is not exactly necessary. And from priborov- only microscope.

25.10.2013 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

probably some Cosmosoma, but before the ball vida-

25.10.2013 15:33, Alex Dumchus:

That requires good equipment and some knowledges in genetics. I turned out to get technical diploma and even candidate degree, not relevant today though.

25.10.2013 15:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm always curious about what I collected. Don't like to have sp. in my collection.

25.10.2013 15:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.10.2013 15:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.10.2013 15:24, Irina Nikulina:

Agonopterix arenella?

25.10.2013 15:24, Irina Nikulina:

Agonopterix arenella?

25.10.2013 15:23, Alex Dumchus:

And where does the cooking genitals? This is giving a decent view zagamachennoy butterfly. It will be pleasing to the eye and warm the soul. A trunk, and remain sp ... if you do not help with the determination.

25.10.2013 15:19, Alex Dumchus:

This tired "cuckold" -samets bee :)))

25.10.2013 15:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And how "old poodle can not teach new tricks!" ???

25.10.2013 15:14, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you, Basil. I, by the way, and a couple of Pandora are morpho zazhirennye. But morpho terrible throw, practice on the revelers and Pandora. By the way, petrol "Shoe" in hozmage sale?
And another question: some morphine and Ulysses have white spots on shiny surfaces krylev.S how to handle this?

25.10.2013 15:13, Sergei Kotov:

Spilosoma lutea

25.10.2013 15:13, Sergei Kotov:

Spilosoma lutea

25.10.2013 15:11, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euthrix potatoria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 15:09, Sergei Kotov:

Euthrix potatoria

25.10.2013 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, read on molbiole: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=408356 there and have my posts :)
The very use gasoline, "Galosha": it turns out well (nothing but fat does not clean).

25.10.2013 15:04, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala nymphagoga / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.10.2013 15:01, Peter Khramov:

Android does not affect, automatic comments generated on the server. If Fota dragged to the form, comments can not be formed.

25.10.2013 15:01, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catocala nymphagoga / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.10.2013 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, if around the Latin name in the comments put two dogs (), the program on site machine will put a link to the form (if it is in the database) or the name of the mold in italics (if the form is not in the database). It is convenient when reading the comments, try. Dim Pozhogin, you too concerned; -)

25.10.2013 14:59, Sergei Kotov:

The vast majority of the photos that the author of the Perm region. This, I think, is also there. And yes, if a variant with malvae fails, it can be (given the fact that this photo was taken during the summer Carterocephalus palaemon) option with Pyrgus serratulae fit?

25.10.2013 14:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Euploea sylvester / Tentatively identified / Alex Dumchus Euploea mulciber / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Ie This is not Palemon And not mallow, helmet in uncertainty?

25.10.2013 14:55, Sergei Kotov:

I wish I did not touch it at all :(

25.10.2013 14:51, Alex Dumchus:

Please, in two words, tell how to make it up? What, just to take petrol 92 and plainly put the specimen into it?? For how long? Till it melts away completely?:)))

25.10.2013 14:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

as butterfly, BU Colombian looked at the bear.

25.10.2013 14:47, Alex Dumchus:

Did you mean Loepa miranda, Loepa diversiocellata and Loepa anthera, who also are found in Vietnam. But the location and shape of the holes on the front wings the first two disappear. The latter is much larger and brighter, so I determined how their sikkima.

25.10.2013 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, Sergey Kotov evidently too hurried as he apparently has a wishful thinking. This is indeed Pyrgus but I can't agree with the very species, definitely not malvae. Also no location where the moth was shot, can't be even tentatively identified.

25.10.2013 14:44, Sergei Kotov:

Young Euthrix potatoria (Linnaeus, 1758)

25.10.2013 14:43, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.10.2013 14:43, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.10.2013 14:40, Sergei Kotov:

The accurate. Zygaenidae of the tracks are well characterized.

25.10.2013 14:40, Alex Dumchus:

This is one of my first ph and I did not defined as sylvester, I also believe that this or mulciber or midamus

25.10.2013 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From komentov and dragging. Just Net mobile stuff. Or an android is not friendly (drag home from the wind to the wired Internet and all the rules). In short, strange.

25.10.2013 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Though some may be what the thread about it say? Curious animal. Steklyannitsevy relative or no modeling?

25.10.2013 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, Eugene, you give the right?

25.10.2013 14:30, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Smerinthus kindermannii / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 14:29, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Carterocephalus palaemon / Andrey Sazykin Pyrgus malvae / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Or in the precise?

25.10.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zygaena lonicerae / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma lubricipedum / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 14:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula furcula / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 14:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula furcula / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 14:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula furcula / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 14:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Furcula furcula / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 14:26, Peter Khramov:

Aah. Basil, then, unless the LC dragging on a tip from the comments, it is logical to leave a comment here, they say, dragged to a logic circuit lined up ...

25.10.2013 14:25, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, of the votes cast pliz ...

25.10.2013 14:25, Peter Khramov:

Define - Alexander, I just asked about synonyms. The point is not who is the faithful staged a synonym, but who, in fact, determined.

25.10.2013 14:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Petr Khramov Alex Dumchus.

25.10.2013 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Excellent. I recall that in the uncertain otrpavlyaem using zero in determining, and if you simply press the button, you will see an empty comment data to change without dopolnitlnoy information.

25.10.2013 13:50, Irina Nikulina:

Spilosoma lutea?

25.10.2013 13:50, Irina Nikulina:

Spilosoma lutea?

25.10.2013 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter set as the first guess. And I will throw uncertain: pavlinoglazok Malay there are several species lazily look :) Maybe someone knows them?

25.10.2013 13:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think that this Euploea mulciber

25.10.2013 13:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morpho deidamia / Confidently identified / Petr Khramov.

25.10.2013 13:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

who cares. if only in vague not loose. and then lit 900 ph

25.10.2013 13:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who put in the definition? Loses ......

25.10.2013 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Xylophanes crotonis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xylophanes crotonis (Walker, 1856)

25.10.2013 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mimoides ariarathes / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mimoides ariarathes / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio isidorus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.10.2013 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio chiansiades / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis neocypris / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis neocypris / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phoebis neocypris / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ganyra phaloe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

transfer to deidamia.

25.10.2013 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catopsilia florella / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

25.10.2013 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Leodonta zenobia / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

25.10.2013 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tarsoctenus praecia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Urbanus doryssus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Heliconius pachinus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

25.10.2013 13:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Biological research station on mountain taiga ", 2006, № 10 In this collection makes no mention of the fact that kirkazona pupae were taken. Here, as in others. References traditional approach-Braley caterpillars pupate, they give altsinoya.None of the search engine (in Russian) can not find any of information-either text or image, Where to mention, it shows images of dolls altsinoya on kirkazona. That someone taking pupae (not caterpillars) and not only kirkazona, but also others. Trees cultivated butterflies. .............. If someone saw a similar info, please, -Kinte link.Just please note - delete reference to cases of domestic cultivation. Since in this case, the caterpillars simply have no other choice but to pupate in a confined space on what is necessary, what to eat, that is, glass containers for food plants.

25.10.2013 11:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thank you received, everything seems simple and is working properly, will surely mistakes, but we reduce them to a reasonable minimum :))

25.10.2013 11:36, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lobophora halterata / Nikolai Vladimirov Trichopteryx carpinata / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.10.2013 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Lobophora halterata / Nikolai Vladimirov Trichopteryx carpinata / Alexandr Zhakov.

25.10.2013 11:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heliconius pachinus Salvin, 1871

25.10.2013 11:23, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Trichopteryx carpinata / Tatyana Gordeeva Lobophora halterata / Sergei Kotov.

25.10.2013 11:19, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Teleiopsis diffinis / Confidently identified / Masha Gill.

25.10.2013 11:18, Sergei Kotov:

No! It is not Trichopteryx carpinata! It - Lobophora halterata !!!

25.10.2013 11:17, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

25.10.2013 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I dragged from the phone today.

25.10.2013 11:13, Sergei Kotov:

Furcula furcula (Clerck, 1759)

25.10.2013 11:13, Sergei Kotov:

Furcula furcula (Clerck, 1759)

25.10.2013 11:12, Sergei Kotov:

Furcula furcula (Clerck, 1759)

25.10.2013 11:12, Sergei Kotov:

Furcula furcula (Clerck, 1759)

25.10.2013 11:10, Sergei Kotov:

Spilosoma lubricipedum (Linnaeus, 1758)

25.10.2013 11:05, Sergei Kotov:

Zygaena lonicerae (Scheven, 1777)

25.10.2013 11:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Urbanus doryssus (Swainson, 1831)

25.10.2013 10:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tarsoctenus praecia Hewitson, 1857

25.10.2013 10:45, Peter Khramov:

Well yes it is in inaccurate.

25.10.2013 10:43, Sergei Kotov:

No!!! It is not Carterocephalus palaemon. It Pyrgus malvae (Linnaeus, 1758) !!!

25.10.2013 10:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leodonta zenobia monticola Joicey & Talbot, 1918

25.10.2013 10:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leodonta zenobia monticola Joicey & Talbot, 1918

25.10.2013 10:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lath Catopsilia florella

25.10.2013 10:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ganyra phaloe sublineata (Schaus, 1902)

25.10.2013 10:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis neocypris (Hübner, [1823])

25.10.2013 10:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis neocypris (Hübner, [1823])

25.10.2013 10:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis neocypris (Hübner, [1823])

25.10.2013 9:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio chiansiades (Westwood, 1872)

25.10.2013 9:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio isidorus (E. Doubleday, 1846)

25.10.2013 9:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mimoides ariarathes gayi (Lucas, 1852)

25.10.2013 9:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mimoides ariarathes gayi (Lucas, 1852)

25.10.2013 8:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The inaccurate !!!!

25.10.2013 8:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Are awesome! As my life- black and white, and even up and down

25.10.2013 7:26, Shamil Murtazin:

it seems that some of gibddeshnogo =)

25.10.2013 3:54, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

25.10.2013 3:52, Alexandr Zhakov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eilema griseola / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.10.2013 1:53, Sergei Kotov:

Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) (in the ill-defined)

25.10.2013 1:53, Sergei Kotov:

Smerinthus kindermanni

25.10.2013 0:37, Svetlana Shchavelina:

The author should be asked. He practises art macro, I know from my own experience that there can be lots of shots to choose the best one, and there can be some bad angle shot (topside) and blur pic (specimen fluttering, details seen though), lots of nuances. Or just an artist whim like "I think this angle is most dramatic" whilst the rest go to a garbage bin.

24.10.2013 23:54, Peter Khramov:

If anyone noticed any similar topside fo this author, please let us know. Maybe will catch it up.

24.10.2013 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Supershtuka.

24.10.2013 23:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Methone cecilia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 23:02, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euselasia zena / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 23:01, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euselasia zena / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 23:01, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with the photo Imago.

24.10.2013 23:01, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis heparana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.10.2013 23:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pandemis heparana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

24.10.2013 23:00, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Stalachtis euterpe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 22:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Astraeodes areuta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 22:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Tigridia acesta / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 22:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Corades enyo / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

24.10.2013 22:59, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cepheuptychia cephus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 22:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cepheuptychia cephus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 22:58, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Taygetis chrysogone / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 22:56, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with other photos from the same individual.

24.10.2013 22:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

24.10.2013 22:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Malacosoma castrensis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.10.2013 22:55, Peter Khramov:

Pentadaktil very popular among them is simple. And in fact: back to undefined?

24.10.2013 22:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, a number of births is shaped wings, among them there are almost white. Only on the inside of the wings, I would not define pterophoridae and do not advise you :)

24.10.2013 22:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 22:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Petrol

24.10.2013 22:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

disagrees. Why is that?

24.10.2013 22:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and type 3

24.10.2013 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 19:38, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris melete / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

24.10.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pieris melete / Tentatively identified / Yuri Semejkin.

24.10.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Yponomeuta evonymella / Tentatively identified / Lev Bely.

24.10.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Yponomeuta evonymella / Tentatively identified / Lev Bely.

24.10.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Yponomeuta evonymella / Tentatively identified / Lev Bely.

24.10.2013 19:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Yponomeuta evonymella / Tentatively identified / Lev Bely.

24.10.2013 19:27, Alex Dumchus:

Saturnia simla (Westwood, 1847)?

24.10.2013 19:13, Alex Dumchus:

It looks like Eacles imperialis

24.10.2013 19:12, Alex Dumchus:

Och.pohozha on Loepa sikkima, Atkinson in Moore, 1866

24.10.2013 18:45, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 18:42, Irina Nikulina:

Malacosoma castrensis?

24.10.2013 18:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Theretra latreillii / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 18:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Theretra silhetensis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 18:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cephonodes picus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 18:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Morpho catenarius / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

24.10.2013 18:04, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with the top picture of the wings.

24.10.2013 18:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea sylvester / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 18:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea sylvester / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 18:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudergolis wedah / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 18:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema xantochlora / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 15:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema xantochlora

24.10.2013 15:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pseudergolis wedah wedah (Kollar, [1844])

24.10.2013 15:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea sylvester harrisii Felder & Felder, [1865]

24.10.2013 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cephonodes picus (Cramer, [1777])

24.10.2013 15:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Theretra silhetensis (Walker, 1856)

24.10.2013 15:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Theretra latreillii (MacLeay, [1826])

24.10.2013 15:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Loepa / species to pass

24.10.2013 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 15:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Here Copaxa escalantei ???

24.10.2013 15:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I messed up. This in uncertain

24.10.2013 14:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acosmeryx shervillii / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

24.10.2013 14:56, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Adeloneivaia boisduvalii / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 14:56, Peter Khramov:

Synonyms, correctly I understand?

24.10.2013 14:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudodirphia menander / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 14:55, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Copaxa rufinans / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 14:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Copaxa rufinans

24.10.2013 14:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Copaxa syntheratoides ???

24.10.2013 14:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Copaxa escalantei ???

24.10.2013 14:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pseudodirphia menander

24.10.2013 14:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Citioica anthonilis ?? female

24.10.2013 14:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Citheronioides collaris male

24.10.2013 14:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Adeloneivaia boisduvalii male

24.10.2013 14:04, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Panacea prola / Confidently identified / Male / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 14:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 13:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Taygetis chrysogone E. Doubleday, [1849]

24.10.2013 13:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cepheuptychia cephus (Fabricius, 1775)

24.10.2013 13:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cepheuptychia cephus (Fabricius, 1775)

24.10.2013 13:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 13:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tigridia acesta fulvescens (A. Butler, 1873)

24.10.2013 13:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male Panacea prola (E. Doubleday, [1848])

24.10.2013 13:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Astraeodes areuta (Westwood, 1851)

24.10.2013 13:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stalachtis euterpe (Linnaeus, 1758)

24.10.2013 13:00, Sergei Kotov:

Click "confirm the form defined correctly." I pressed accidentally. Apologize! Nothing will transfer in this case is not necessary.

24.10.2013 12:59, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 12:58, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 12:57, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 12:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 12:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2013 12:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It can be inaccurate. Rhode exactly this. The underside would be ....

24.10.2013 12:47, Sergei Kotov:

First, not exactly S.ocellatus not S.caecus. The two feed on poplars and willows, but the plants on which sits a caterpillar in the photo, is clearly not a poplar and willow. And it looks absolutely on track and S.ocellatus S.caecus not like.

Version with S. planus rightly dismissed Vasily.

So it is - Smerinthus kindermanni /

.

24.10.2013 12:39, Sergei Kotov:

Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) (in the ill-defined)

24.10.2013 12:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rhode Lasaia, need underside

24.10.2013 12:27, Sergei Kotov:

Summary - Pandemis heparana (inaccuracy)

24.10.2013 12:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ancyluris inca (Saunders, 1850) ???

24.10.2013 12:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ancyluris inca (Saunders, 1850) ???

24.10.2013 12:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euselasia zena (Hewitson, 1860)

24.10.2013 12:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euselasia zena (Hewitson, 1860)

24.10.2013 12:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This, of course, Methone cecilia (Cramer, 1777)

24.10.2013 11:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pierella helvina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 11:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

24.10.2013 11:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cerura vinula / Confidently identified / Sergey Talanov Furcula bifida / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

24.10.2013 11:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cerura vinula / Sergey Talanov Furcula bifida / Sergei Kotov.

24.10.2013 11:46, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with other photos from the same individual.

24.10.2013 11:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura felina / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.10.2013 11:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura felina / Tentatively identified / Irina Nikulina.

24.10.2013 11:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atlides inachus / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 11:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Necyria duellona / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 11:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarota chrysus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.10.2013 11:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sarota chrysus (Stoll, 1781) ???

24.10.2013 11:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rhode exactly can be seen not sure. Necyria duellona Westwood, 1851

24.10.2013 11:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I suppose Atlides inachus (Cramer, 1775), but I stuffed cabbage oak oak.

24.10.2013 10:00, Peter Khramov:

Basil, are you for the test, or really need to back?

24.10.2013 8:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Top of need.

24.10.2013 8:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pierella helvina

24.10.2013 8:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parides! But what?

24.10.2013 8:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tentatively identified. Am not good in these.

24.10.2013 8:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Basil! Cut and boil! In another, I do not know how.

24.10.2013 8:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It should be cut. By drugomu- special needs.

24.10.2013 8:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not exactly. Boil them necessary.

24.10.2013 5:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK. Who tried, it works. I rode to work ......

24.10.2013 5:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Panacea regina / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov Not identified.

24.10.2013 5:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Panacea regina / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

24.10.2013 2:02, Peter Khramov:

That subsection "The old description" and "Forage plants" on pages with descriptions of species are disappearing - this is normal. Of the old descriptions infa transferred to the new system with an indication of the sources (ie the data is not going away, they are on the same page in a more civilian clothes), in the future, this section will not appear greater.INFA of "Forage crops" is also transferred to the detailed information from the source, but after a while the partition returns to stern, in the formalized form (ie,The situation is similar, for example, the one that is now available to the flight of time - in a formalized form displays a table of months, when adults of flies, and below is a detailed infa sources, especially the flight of time, depending on the specific part of the range, etc.)

24.10.2013 1:28, Sergei Kotov:

Cerura felina Butler, 1877 (inaccuracy)

24.10.2013 1:26, Sergei Kotov:

Furcula bifida (Barhm, 1787)

24.10.2013 1:26, Sergei Kotov:

Furcula bifida (Barhm, 1787)

24.10.2013 1:24, Peter Khramov:

Basil to send Fautua in undefined - is put in the field is defined to 0 (zero), and leave everything else as is. Well, press button updates itself.
Alexander, I have made you the right to transport of photons, is now reset to post a brief instruction - if something is not clear, write.

24.10.2013 1:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta menyanthidis / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

23.10.2013 23:07, Sergei Kotov:

Acronicta menyanthidis (Esper, 1789)

23.10.2013 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Basil, try something right now to move from non-specific (I will return later), just for the test. I plow all the rules ...

23.10.2013 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Somehow infa transfer does not appear automatically.

23.10.2013 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved.

23.10.2013 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved.

23.10.2013 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved.

23.10.2013 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moved.

23.10.2013 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well it now and let down both.

23.10.2013 21:38, Alex Dumchus:

I think that this, too Samia tetrica

23.10.2013 21:37, Alex Dumchus:

Vasily, I think this is way much easy, the moth was collected there long ago and deemed as a subspecies, S.kanningi or S.insularis. Then those guys decided to describe it as a new species (opposite to swallowtails which get combined for some reason — scientific ambitions). Turned out that.

23.10.2013 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

12 years ago, is described (in 2001). However, there is a place ..........

23.10.2013 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.10.2013 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now I add the form and leave.

23.10.2013 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And judging by the second "Lopukhov" -samka. So until and distributed.

23.10.2013 20:21, Alex Dumchus:

I think Samia kohlli, male

23.10.2013 20:00, Alex Dumchus:

Samia kohlli Naumann & Peigler, 2001
Distribution: West Malaysia (Pahang).

23.10.2013 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've got even three at the moment :) Afraid to upload.

23.10.2013 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now throw in three more to think.

23.10.2013 19:11, Alex Dumchus:

Och.pohozha on Samia tetrica (Rebel, 1924) male, the same little dark, inhabited: West Malaysia (Pahang, Perak); East Malaysia (Brunei, Sarawak).

23.10.2013 18:42, Irina Nikulina:

The three managed to pupate at a height of almost 11000km! I never thought that this could be - take off on ET caterpillars, pupae landed).

23.10.2013 18:02, Alex Dumchus:

To get lighter pics is easy. I seem to have found two more different. As for the examination, please no! As one my friend said, old dog not for a new tricks!

23.10.2013 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And perhaps soon even these "cyanides" Malay bring up: scary mess. Somewhere to the table on them any network nadybat? Something sought, not found.

23.10.2013 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Episteme vetula / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems such is the genus: without a bottle of whiskey....... :) Moving.

23.10.2013 16:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Episteme vetula

23.10.2013 16:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I would say Cyana conclusa. How to define this kind?

23.10.2013 16:36, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with other photos from the same individual.

23.10.2013 16:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Macroglossum mediovitta / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 16:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum mediovitta / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 16:36, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Macroglossum stellatarum / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

23.10.2013 16:35, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Altinote dicaeus / Confidently identified / Dmitroy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 16:35, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Helicopis gnidus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 16:34, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Pieris napi / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

23.10.2013 16:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Macroglossum

23.10.2013 16:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Macroglossum

23.10.2013 16:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Macroglossum mediovitta? Photos are very dark. For all Macroglossum. Something to say 100% - very hard. It is necessary to cook. Tables genitals of this genus is. If svarite- define 100%

23.10.2013 16:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

23.10.2013 16:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

23.10.2013 16:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I suppose Altinote dicaeus (Latreille, [1817])

23.10.2013 16:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Helicopis gnidus (Fabricius, 1787)

23.10.2013 15:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Pupation at home

23.10.2013 15:43, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, inaccurate felina.

23.10.2013 15:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Leptophobia forsteri / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 15:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tolerated. Similarly, it is

23.10.2013 14:14, Peter Khramov:

The inaccurate felina?

23.10.2013 13:55, Irina Nikulina:

Thus, in the Far East - erminea and felina.

23.10.2013 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, in the catalog choose the region of the Russian Federation and "random taxon" Enter any kind. After that - voila, all the right kinds before your eyes.

23.10.2013 13:23, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there was a glitch, now everything is going to fly, move for the second time did not have. Thanks for the tip.

23.10.2013 13:10, Sergei Kotov:

And what species of Cerura generally occur in the Far East?

23.10.2013 12:21, Irina Nikulina:

I tend to Cerura felina Butler, 1877. Or do vinula? Somebody tell me?

23.10.2013 12:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Catonephele sabrina / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

23.10.2013 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Diaethria clymena / Tentatively identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

23.10.2013 12:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Catonephele orites / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

23.10.2013 12:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Cithaerias pireta / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

23.10.2013 12:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Anartia amathea / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

23.10.2013 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Papilio thoas / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

23.10.2013 12:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For some reason, he remained in uncertainty. I had to repeat the transfer.

23.10.2013 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Dryadula phaetusa / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

23.10.2013 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Opigena polygona / Tentatively identified / Sergey Talanov Conisania luteago / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

23.10.2013 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Epirrita autumnata / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

23.10.2013 11:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Epirrita autumnata / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

23.10.2013 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While not touch?

23.10.2013 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Leptophobia caesia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 11:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leptophobia caesia (Lucas, 1852)

23.10.2013 11:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Very nice animal. Leptophobia forsteri Baumann & Reissinger, 1969. underside would be 100%

23.10.2013 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Anteros cruentatus / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 11:05, Irina Nikulina:

Not exactly the image defect. Apparently, dripped) Thank you, Vasily

23.10.2013 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Pierella helvina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Lacanobia suasa / Confidently identified / > Cucullia lucifuga / Tentatively identified /.

23.10.2013 11:02, Sergei Kotov:

need to move in Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (but so far ill-defined). Do not leave it as Lacanobia suasa, in the end ???

23.10.2013 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Defective or dripped something.

23.10.2013 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Phengaris arion / Vasiily Feoktistov > Phengaris arionides / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2013 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Phengaris arionides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2013 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Phengaris arion / Vasily Feoktistov > Phengaris arionides / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2013 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phengaris arionides / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

23.10.2013 10:55, Sergei Kotov:

Irina right! This is not the Arion is - Phengaris arionides.

23.10.2013 10:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

23.10.2013 10:55, Sergei Kotov:

Irina right! This is not the Arion is - Phengaris arionides.

23.10.2013 10:54, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

23.10.2013 10:51, Irina Nikulina:

It would be interesting to know what the spot on the right wing. Maybe someone from the special know-s?

23.10.2013 10:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pierella helvina

23.10.2013 10:41, Sergei Kotov:

No, not exactly umbratica. In this instance there is no characteristic umbratica yellowish area in the middle of the front wing: http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1311-cucullia-umbratica.
It Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)! But to endure in this case it is necessary in certain inaccurate.Why is imprecisely defined? Yes, simply because we do not know the date of capture, and even a possible option (if the specimens photographed in the early spring, for example, in the first half of May), it is - lactucae. But the option is again unlikely, because in this case, this is more like a butterfly lucifuga.The sign by which to distinguish species and lactucae lucifuga recently demonstrated Oleg Baking (barko) the forum topic definition butterflies (page 440, Message URL # 21982).
The result - you need to carry in Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (but so far ill-defined). Do not leave it as Lacanobia suasa, in the end ???

23.10.2013 10:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

23.10.2013 10:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

23.10.2013 10:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I suppose Anteros cruentatus Stichel, 1911

23.10.2013 10:39, Sergei Kotov:

No, not exactly umbratica. In this instance there is no characteristic umbratica yellowish area in the middle of the front wing: http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1311-cucullia-umbratica.
It Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)! But to endure in this case it is necessary in certain inaccurate.Why is imprecisely defined? Yes, simply because we do not know the date of capture, and even a possible option (if the specimens photographed in the early spring, for example, in the first half of May), it is - lucifuga. But the option is again unlikely, because in this case, this is more like a butterfly lucifuga.The sign by which to distinguish species and lucifuga lucifuga recently demonstrated Oleg Baking (barko) the forum topic definition butterflies (page 440, Message URL # 21982).
The result - you need to carry in Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (but so far ill-defined). Do not leave it as Lacanobia suasa, in the end ???

23.10.2013 10:33, Irina Nikulina:

And this is similar to Pts Phengaris arionides

23.10.2013 10:20, Irina Nikulina:

Isn't this Phengaris arionides?

23.10.2013 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasily Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2013 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasily Feoktistov → Alexandr Zhakov.

23.10.2013 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Instead umbratica hour? Kukula is understandable, but about the kind of ???

23.10.2013 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Underside added: all I can do.

23.10.2013 8:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He added underside to both: it can give something?

23.10.2013 8:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Comments to this picture here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3156

23.10.2013 8:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Diarsia florida / Vasily Feoktistov > Chersotis cuprea / Sergey Kotov.

23.10.2013 8:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

23.10.2013 8:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. It is likely that with DV

23.10.2013 8:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is impossible, they got me from one person after his death, without labels: inherited. There are options?

23.10.2013 2:58, Lev Bely:

clymena?

23.10.2013 2:33, Sergei Kotov:

Type defined incorrectly! It is not Cerura vinula! This is something of Furcula sp.
Perhaps, Furcula bifida (Barhm, 1787) (in the ill-defined)

23.10.2013 2:33, Sergei Kotov:

Type defined incorrectly! It is not Cerura vinula! This is something of Furcula sp.
Perhaps, Furcula bifida (Barhm, 1787) (in the ill-defined)

23.10.2013 2:23, Sergei Kotov:

If this photo is made in the Kirov region (as well as many other photos of the author), it is - Conisania luteago, no options.

23.10.2013 2:17, Sergei Kotov:

Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

23.10.2013 1:27, Sergei Kotov:

Argynnis paphia (Linnaeus, 1758)

23.10.2013 1:18, Sergei Kotov:

Basil and label data, you can find this instance? Whether in the far east of catching this instance?

23.10.2013 1:18, Sergei Kotov:

Basil and label data, you can find this instance? Whether in the far east of catching this instance?

23.10.2013 1:11, Sergei Kotov:

This is definitely not Diarsia florida!
This is Chersotis cuprea!!! http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae/1490-chersotis-cuprea
Folks, how come?

23.10.2013 1:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

23.10.2013 1:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pieris brassicae / Irina Nikulina → Pieris rapae / Evgeny Karolinsky.

23.10.2013 0:59, Irina Nikulina:

It is necessary to transfer the photos to rapae, there has long agreed with Eugene)

23.10.2013 0:53, Sergei Kotov:

This butterfly has a long history as a definite. Why has not yet been transferred ???

23.10.2013 0:37, Peter Khramov:

What kind of Diaethria one thread can tell? ..

22.10.2013 23:45, Sergei Kotov:

Epirrita autumnata (Borkhausen, 1794)

22.10.2013 23:44, Sergei Kotov:

Epirrita autumnata (Borkhausen, 1794)

22.10.2013 23:36, Sergei Kotov:

Acronicta menyanthidis (Esper, 1789)

22.10.2013 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Macroglossum stellatarum / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

22.10.2013 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago > Pieris napi / Confidently identified / Female / Sergey Kotov.

22.10.2013 22:47, Shamil Murtazin:

with Belyanko is tight (

22.10.2013 22:46, Shamil Murtazin:

while distracted - still determined ... =)

22.10.2013 22:44, Shamil Murtazin:

filled file and then signed what I know :)
not immediately, but almost immediately.

22.10.2013 22:42, Sergei Kotov:

Macroglossum stellatarum, (Linnaeus, 1758)

22.10.2013 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to enter the name of the right to pad was not: the two types of human right is determined. A Painted Lady coordinates to think it is not necessary: ​​it is common almost everywhere in the world, very famous and the migrant can meet her anywhere :)

22.10.2013 22:42, Shamil Murtazin:

This village of some. the chandelier hanging on the porch. I glance around the track.

22.10.2013 22:41, Sergei Kotov:

No, Pieris napi (Linnaeus, 1758).

22.10.2013 22:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Oops ... something parallel)
just shake my archive and then mark up)

22.10.2013 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Shamil Murtazin Vasiliy Feoktistov.

22.10.2013 22:36, Shamil Murtazin:

Pieris rapae?

22.10.2013 22:34, Shamil Murtazin:

In what format to enter the coordinates? ..

22.10.2013 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shamil, this moth is just quite worn-out, that's it. As for the spot, this is here in the right wing, just semi-erased :)

22.10.2013 21:23, Shamil Murtazin:

like. even the darkest point is, only underdeveloped.
of the differences - a short fringe and no dark spots on the top of the front wing.

22.10.2013 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Pelurga comitata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulinа.

22.10.2013 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Pelurga comitata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.10.2013 21:19, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you. Really varies greatly)

22.10.2013 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No one else.

22.10.2013 21:18, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.10.2013 21:17, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.10.2013 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago → Male.

22.10.2013 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago → Male.

22.10.2013 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Erannis defoliaria / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

22.10.2013 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Pelurga comitata / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.10.2013 21:13, Irina Nikulina:

Pelurga comitata (Linnaeus, 1758)?

22.10.2013 21:13, Irina Nikulina:

Pelurga comitata (Linnaeus, 1758)?

22.10.2013 21:10, Sergei Kotov:

Well, if the date of the capture of the fourth of October the Erannis defoliaria without question.

22.10.2013 21:10, Sergei Kotov:

Well, if the date of the capture of the fourth of October the Erannis defoliaria without question.

22.10.2013 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Frankly to date and I did not look at first. Just go with the stripped (defoliaria) suspected. Let somebody else will speak, and then fast forward.

22.10.2013 20:40, Irina Nikulina:

Excuse me, Basil, Sergei, has corrected the date - 4 October. In light of the changes probably right Basil?

22.10.2013 20:38, Irina Nikulina:

Please prostit- misled by inaccurate prostanovkoy DATE SEARCH certainly not 10.04, and 04.10, ie October 4th! Place the zhe Moscow

22.10.2013 20:16, Sergei Kotov:

Agriopis marginaria (see. "Time and place / fishing")

22.10.2013 20:14, Sergei Kotov:

Basil, pay attention to "Time and place / fishing." There in black and white the date: April 10, 2010 While Erannis defoliaria - autumnal view, its the summer end of September - October. So the author of the photo rights, Agriopis marginaria it.

22.10.2013 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

IErannis defoliariasuch a dark (it varies greatly).

22.10.2013 18:17, Irina Nikulina:

Agriopis marginaria?

22.10.2013 15:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In any case not through Bali. After Jakarta.

22.10.2013 14:05, Alex Dumchus:

Sorry, I thought you fly in the Indonesian part of the island.

22.10.2013 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Rhetus dysonii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Dumchus.

22.10.2013 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Rhetus dysonii / Confidently identified / Alexandr Dumchus.

22.10.2013 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Catonephele orites / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

22.10.2013 12:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Catonephele sabrina / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

22.10.2013 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Cithaerias pireta / Tentatively identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

22.10.2013 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Dryadula phaetusa / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

22.10.2013 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Diaethria clymena / Tentatively identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

22.10.2013 8:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Anartia amathea / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

22.10.2013 8:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What flights through Bali? I was not in Indonesia and do not plan yet. I fly to Malaysia (Sarawak and Sabah) Moscow- Gonkong- Kota Kinabalu

22.10.2013 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dichrorampha simpliciana / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov → Ancylis uncella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

22.10.2013 8:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Papilio thoas / Confidently identified / Vasily Feoktistov.

21.10.2013 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, if I understood correctly, and you loaded the underside, eating it in a group with top pliz. And even at the close perlamutrovki too.

21.10.2013 22:59, Peter Khramov:

The author has agreed to the publication of his pictures on our website, today I downloaded the first few of them. Can anyone please suggest a specific accessory for (well, or at least supraspecific).

21.10.2013 22:40, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos need to be moved to Ancylis uncella.

21.10.2013 22:28, Peter Khramov:

Basil, yes, this may be done in the near future.
Alexander, understand and I and others will be able to, because Now automatically monitors and publishes all transfers ("data changed ..." - it's not us with Basil hand writing, it generates the program itself).And about how to use - do not worry, the time no one rubber, because, in fact, rassharivat more rights, there is one chela time - suffered no time, there was another moderator - he suffered, and the result will be better.In fact, he now became much better when I'm not alone began to carry, and even Basil joined. In general, do you right along with corrections for uncertain for a day or two then.

21.10.2013 22:17, Andrey Lutikov:

Yes, I confirm, as the author of this very confusion. Caterpillar pupa this was a "blue" tail ... :-)

21.10.2013 22:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Spaelotis ravida / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2013 22:05, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Schrankia costaestrigalis / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov → Hypenodes humidalis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2013 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Aplocera plagiata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2013 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Emmelina monodactyla / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

21.10.2013 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, a subspecies of append to the photos in your lux (field called species): I can not do that.

21.10.2013 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio paris.

21.10.2013 19:24, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos need to be moved to Spaelotis ravida.

21.10.2013 19:23, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos need to be moved to Hypenodes humidalis.

21.10.2013 19:21, Sergei Kotov:

Alexandr, sorry, but here can't agree with you. Who said this moth has dark scales on the forewing underside? This might be just poor light (as a result the moth got darkened), so it seems the forewing underside has darken scales whilst the species has actually no any. In the end, the wing shape ideally fits Pterophorus pentadactyla, any other species doesn't go because of the different wing shape.

21.10.2013 19:15, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos should be returned back to undefined.

21.10.2013 19:14, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos should be returned back to undefined.

21.10.2013 19:12, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos should be returned back to undefined.

21.10.2013 19:11, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos should be returned back to undefined.

21.10.2013 19:10, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos should be returned back to undefined.

21.10.2013 19:09, Sergei Kotov:

I admit my mistake. Photos need to be moved to Ancylis uncella.

21.10.2013 17:50, Alex Dumchus:

Flights have been direct or through Bali? A. However, when flies, unsubscribe, please.

21.10.2013 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Smerinthus ocellataMimas tiliae.

21.10.2013 15:44, Sergei Kotov:

Photos need to be moved to fake revelers (Mimas tiliae).

21.10.2013 15:43, Sergei Kotov:

People! I want to admit his mistake. I do not know what I was thinking when he defines this as a caterpillar Smerinthus ocellata, but now, after quite a long period of time (nine months have passed since my initial determination) I look back at this photograph and horrified.In fact, there is shown a caterpillar not mottled hawk (Smerinthus ocellata), and lime (Mimas tiliae). I apologize for the mistake.

Photos need to be moved to fake revelers (Mimas tiliae).

21.10.2013 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In reality there is no such possibility. Otherwise, for a long time, it is returned to the uncertainty that is necessary.
Alexander, stripped, please contact this chore for "football game" species :)

21.10.2013 14:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Laothoe populi / Vitaly Gumenyuk → Smerinthus ocellata / Sergey Kotov.

21.10.2013 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Laothoe populi / Vitaly Gumenyuk → Smerinthus ocellata / Sergey Kotov.

21.10.2013 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Laothoe populi / Vitaly Gumenyuk → Smerinthus ocellata / Sergey Kotov.

21.10.2013 12:57, Peter Khramov:

Sergei. Well, Basil also told you - the transfer is done manually, and carrying on the site are not around the clock. Wait a bit, and everything will be ...

21.10.2013 12:33, Sergei Kotov:

Guys, why not moving? Or you lost confidence in me? Sure I may easily err in microlepidoptera and promise will never try to identify them again, but it's not the case with hawkmoth larvae. In summer I get lots of hawkmoths of larvae including Smerinthus ocellatа and Laothoe populi so may responsibly say this is not Laothoe populi larva but one of Smerinthus ocellatа. Here everything's clear, no mistake possible. Photo should be properly moved to the species. I already said below which species was right.

21.10.2013 12:31, Sergei Kotov:

Guys, why not moving? Or you lost confidence in me? Sure I may easily err in microlepidoptera and promise will never try to identify them again, but it's not the case with hawkmoth larvae. In summer I get lots of hawkmoths of larvae including Smerinthus ocellatа and Laothoe populi so may responsibly say this is not Laothoe populi larva but one of Smerinthus ocellatа. Here everything's clear, no mistake possible. Photo should be properly moved to the species. I already said below which species was right.

21.10.2013 12:30, Sergei Kotov:

Guys, why not moving? Or you lost confidence in me? Sure I may easily err in microlepidoptera and promise will never try to identify them again, but it's not the case with hawkmoth larvae. In summer I get lots of hawkmoths of larvae including Smerinthus ocellatа and Laothoe populi so may responsibly say this is not Laothoe populi larva but one of Smerinthus ocellatа. Here everything's clear, no mistake possible. Photo should be properly moved to the species. I already said below which species was right.

21.10.2013 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it would be desirable to be able to properly carry case blunders certain types back into uncertainty. Add me to this thing, plz.

21.10.2013 9:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How did this beast?

21.10.2013 8:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Regarding Indonesia did not was- I do not know. Friends went to Borneo and Sulavesi- had no problems. Perhaps as lucky.

20.10.2013 21:23, Sergei Kotov:

If this photo shows the same track as in the picture # 5309 and # 5305, it is also Smerinthus ocellata (Linnaeus, 1758)!

20.10.2013 21:21, Sergei Kotov:

This caterpillar Smerinthus ocellata (Linnaeus, 1758)!

20.10.2013 21:21, Sergei Kotov:

This caterpillar Smerinthus ocellata (Linnaeus, 1758)!

20.10.2013 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Oh, seem I witchcrafted there))

20.10.2013 14:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Have always good to question why? quickly correct mistakes, make a photo in types, this is good, but how it will use not know, and then you can understand what we are and where naperenosim :) In principle there is no objection, I know some of the butterflies kasyak well and try not to miss, or correct.:) Sergei Kotov wanted to create one good thing to reduce the vague picture, but it turned out he had a few sloppy, often they do not even certain I watched it a bunch of similar species, I do not dare, it is generally only starts at random and determines :(

20.10.2013 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, photo 3731, Vasily, was promptly after the determination is transferred to the form, and then back to my comments, with the post to move the species disappeared, and was identified as Sergei Kotov. :)

20.10.2013 13:54, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, thanks corrected. Alexander, you tend to be similar like Basil issue? Or meanwhile did not Noonan?

20.10.2013 13:51, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, there is sense that Basil this function yet (not that any restriction, but just not technically be added), and I have. Soon add and Basil (by the way, and you do not need?: -) With regards to the foty 3731, it seems to be and was always uncertain.

20.10.2013 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Clearly wrong author's ID, this is evidently not Opigena polygona, some hadenina, can't say precisely without location and date, anyway should be moved out of here. Vasily, how come there's no moving back to not identified whilst we've just seen it here http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3731

20.10.2013 5:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I unfortunately can not return it to uncertain ones: I've got no such possibility.
Be careful with the definition of such specimen, guys :)

19.10.2013 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, your cant fix. How could quickly :)

19.10.2013 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dichrorampha incananaEana incanana.

19.10.2013 18:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

On page http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23656 photo zheltushki glitch in zygaenidae :)

19.10.2013 18:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aplocera plagiata

19.10.2013 18:31, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitriy. Are you connected? You can answer by -povodu export from Indonesia?

19.10.2013 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Emmelina monodactyla

19.10.2013 18:22, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio paris battacorum

19.10.2013 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's 100% NOT Pandesma robusta (Walker, 1858) :)

19.10.2013 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

This butterfly to Pandesma robusta (Walker, 1858) or what to do. :)

19.10.2013 15:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

View is wrong, it Ancylis uncella
The ill-defined put photos when they can choose between how much very similar views. There are different tribes,

19.10.2013 15:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

it is right :)

19.10.2013 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Determination Vlad Proklova maximum that can be squeezed out of the picture, all the rest of the evil :)

19.10.2013 14:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergei, such definitions, you put all your work into question. This is not a moth, it Gelechiidae.

19.10.2013 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

What's really happening here? :)))
Here even family is doubtful, as for the species I can 100% guarantee this is not Damophila deauratella (Lienig & Zeller, 1846), or here Coleophora deauratella Lienig & Zeller 1846
Sergey please refrain from such inaccurate IDs :)

19.10.2013 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, gentlemen, we clocked.
Basil, Sergei wrote Eana incanana (Stephens 1852), not Dichrorampha incanana (Clemens, 1860) (this species in Europe is not, and it all from a different subfamily).
Sergei, you have to put a monument, if you are on such a photo to determine the type Cnephasiini, I used to kind of do not come from, though digested hundreds of them;)

19.10.2013 14:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

This definition is also very doubtful. one and the same butterfly that foto14032

19.10.2013 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very dubious definition.

19.10.2013 14:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

This incorrect definition, have no Pterophorus pentadactyla dark scales on the underside of the upper wings.

19.10.2013 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Incorrect definition, it is notEuxoa nigricans, itSpaelotis ravida

19.10.2013 13:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Incorrect definition

19.10.2013 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong definition, Sergey, please be careful.

19.10.2013 13:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong definition

19.10.2013 13:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Incorrect oprededlenie is notSchrankia costaestrigalis, itHypenodes humidalis

19.10.2013 13:41, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis adippe / Confidently identified / Alexsandr Martukov.

19.10.2013 13:16, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

19.10.2013 13:04, Sergei Kotov:

Euxoa nigricans (Linnaeus, 1761)

19.10.2013 12:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pterophorus pentadactyla Jodis lactearia.

19.10.2013 12:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Pterophorus pentadactyla / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

19.10.2013 11:32, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I removed. Gluck knew what I write his list to treat ...

19.10.2013 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, get out of here yesterday http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/13783 my hawk. Again photo got out where it is not necessary.

19.10.2013 7:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Schrankia costaestrigalis / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

18.10.2013 23:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, well everything turned out like that. Fixed all my Malaysia: is held.

18.10.2013 22:49, Sergei Kotov:

Schrankia costaestrigalis (Stephens, 1834) (in the ill-defined)

18.10.2013 22:44, Sergei Kotov:

Pterophorus pentadactyla (Linnaeus, 1758) (in the ill-defined)

18.10.2013 22:41, Sergei Kotov:

Jodis lactearia (Linnaeus, 1758)

18.10.2013 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Batrachedra praeangusta / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

18.10.2013 21:15, Sergei Kotov:

Oh, sorry, I'm sorry. I understand that in this photo the same butterfly, as in the photo # 14082. In this case, Batrachedra praeangusta is (can be transferred at precisely defined).

18.10.2013 21:12, Sergei Kotov:

Ypsolopha scabrella (Linnaeus, 1761) (in the ill-defined)

18.10.2013 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Phyllonorycter issikii / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

18.10.2013 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Anacampsis blattariella / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

18.10.2013 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anacampsis blattariella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

18.10.2013 18:03, Sergei Kotov:

Anacampsis blattariella (Hubner, 1796) (in the ill-defined)

18.10.2013 18:02, Sergei Kotov:

Phyllonorycter issikii (Kumata 1963) (in the ill-defined)

18.10.2013 17:55, Sergei Kotov:

Anacampsis blattariella (Hubner, 1796)

18.10.2013 16:51, Alex Dumchus:

Nate you ispod - 24030

18.10.2013 16:36, Alex Dumchus:

You can get into your discussion. Dmitry, and in Indonesia with customs? Let Tae in Vietnam and all over the spit, and in Indonesia the many kinds of CITES. Are there any problems with the export?

18.10.2013 15:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis hylas / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

18.10.2013 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Yponomeuta evonymella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

18.10.2013 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

18.10.2013 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Cydia pomonella / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

18.10.2013 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ambulyx moorei / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

18.10.2013 13:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Neptis hylas / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

18.10.2013 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Euploea eyndhovii / Tentatively identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Kallimoides rumia / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema xantochlora / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 13:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This can be transferred

18.10.2013 13:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

like Kallima rumia

18.10.2013 13:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems female Euploea eyndhovii

18.10.2013 13:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Neptis hylas

18.10.2013 12:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Photo disgusting.

18.10.2013 11:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While all the assumptions put inaccurate.

18.10.2013 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania militaris / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania militaris / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania subrepleta / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania subrepleta / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 11:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dysphania transducta / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 11:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eumelea ludovicata / Tentatively identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 11:53, Sergei Kotov:

Yponomeuta evonymellus (Linnaeus, 1758)

18.10.2013 11:52, Sergei Kotov:

Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus, 1758)

18.10.2013 11:52, Sergei Kotov:

Cydia pomonella (Linnaeus, 1758)

18.10.2013 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, in Moscow and the train caught it all :)
Catcher these butterflies just my good friend. So he gave me a generous material there.

18.10.2013 10:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily no other way to Malaysia mainland drove? We're leaving on February 7. Only in Borneo.

18.10.2013 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I Thought 2 different species, and the variability is just ...... Round postponed.

18.10.2013 10:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

He clearly.

18.10.2013 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Graphium meyeri / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 10:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

demand underside!

18.10.2013 10:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Graphium meyeri / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

18.10.2013 10:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Congratulations or condolences.

18.10.2013 10:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not again meyeri? I have 2 males from the same point: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23315 detected as meyeri, and this specimen. and he did not like.

18.10.2013 9:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I suppose Eumelea ludovicata female

18.10.2013 9:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Something of the sort Eumelea, but before the ball vida-

18.10.2013 9:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dysphania, I assume transducta

18.10.2013 9:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dysphania, apparently subrepleta

18.10.2013 9:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dysphania, apparently subrepleta

18.10.2013 9:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dysphania, apparently militaris

18.10.2013 9:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dysphania, apparently militaris

18.10.2013 9:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Graphium meyeri

18.10.2013 8:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyaniris semiargus / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

18.10.2013 1:40, Peter Khramov:

Here you go. They spoiled the whole raspberries.

18.10.2013 1:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Xestia sexstrigata / Анастасия Кружкова Amphipoea fucosa / Sergei Kotov.

18.10.2013 0:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Sergei.

18.10.2013 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. More Tomorrow someone must lay poluchitsa determine if (do not want to spread indefinite).

18.10.2013 0:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Really hefty beast :)

18.10.2013 0:14, Sergei Kotov:

No! It's definitely not Xestia sexstrigata! This is something of Amphipoea sp. Perhaps, Amphipoea fucosa (Freyer, 1830) (in the ill-defined)

18.10.2013 0:12, Peter Khramov:

Really male.

18.10.2013 0:06, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus semiargus (Rottemburg, 1775) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Pandemis cerasana / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

17.10.2013 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter flies an accurate indication of the geography of Malaysia after my download each new photo. All with the label, and it is quite a long set of letters / characters. I found similar.

17.10.2013 22:04, Sergei Kotov:

Pandemis cerasana (Hubner, 1786) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The male still.

17.10.2013 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2013 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2013 21:09, Sergei Kotov:

Celypha lacunana (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 21:09, Sergei Kotov:

Celypha lacunana (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio aristeus.

17.10.2013 19:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We had to completely write Papilio aristeus (several options and this is one of them).

17.10.2013 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio aristeus.

17.10.2013 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.10.2013 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.10.2013 19:44, Alex Dumchus:

Site reason prescribes equality with menatius, although they are very different, both from Peru.

17.10.2013 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Archips rosana.

17.10.2013 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2013 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips rosana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2013 17:45, Sergei Kotov:

Archips rosanus (Linnaeus, 1758) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 17:44, Sergei Kotov:

Archips rosanus (Linnaeus, 1758) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 17:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chrysoteuchia culmella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2013 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2013 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

17.10.2013 16:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

male

17.10.2013 16:49, Sergei Kotov:

Chrysoteuchia culmella (Linnaeus, 1758)

17.10.2013 16:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Unfortunately: I have really nothing. I pour it back in 2009 and since then and photos left and gave herself a butterfly. Alas ... Cause and asked Alexander to lay out more.

17.10.2013 16:33, Peter Khramov:

I have many pictures original members that were loaded when a large size on the site was not provided. All did not undertake their mess ... And ekzemplyarchik the same species it is now here at Lepstora lies in souvenirs, maybe even zasnimu. At the same time nepotrepanny will.

17.10.2013 16:22, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Ehhhhh ... and perezalit photos - in any way? This beautiful butterfly, but the photo does not increase ....

17.10.2013 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

17.10.2013 15:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Dichrorampha incanana / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

17.10.2013 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Coleophora deauratella / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

17.10.2013 15:36, Sergei Kotov:

Coleophora deauratella Lienig & Zeller 1846 (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 15:31, Sergei Kotov:

Eana incanana (Stephens 1852) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 15:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

17.10.2013 15:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Archips crataegana / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2013 15:20, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the link. Now rework section Sooschestva into something more forumnoobraznoe at the request of the workers, there should be a sub-section for such links. A photo that was written, by the way, maybe even on our website it will foty: -)

17.10.2013 13:32, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Found on the web Colin Hutton's website, he's a macro photographer, takes stunning macro of insects and others including lepidoptera and larvae. Enjoy:
http://www.colinhuttonphotography.com/galleries

17.10.2013 13:30, Sergei Kotov:

Archips crataeganus (Hubner, 1799) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 13:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Macroglossum stellatarum / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

17.10.2013 13:20, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Anacampsis blattariella / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

17.10.2013 12:32, Sergei Kotov:

Macroglossum stellatarum, (Linnaeus, 1758)

17.10.2013 12:30, Sergei Kotov:

Anacampsis blattariella (Hubner, 1796) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dichrorampha simpliciana / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

17.10.2013 12:09, Sergei Kotov:

Dichrorampha simpliciana (Haworth 1811) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 11:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, a little confused with the authorship definition :)

17.10.2013 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Василий Сергиенко.

17.10.2013 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Dichrorampha simpliciana / Tentatively identified / Sergey Kotov.

17.10.2013 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Eupithecia biornata / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Pasiphila debiliata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

17.10.2013 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apparently "all-knowing" Google knows about this subspecies is very small: https://www.google.ru/search?client=opera&q=Lethe+vindhya+luaba+Corbet,+1941&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest
And these photos there will be one of the first (more on molbiol exhibited them)! A definition of Dmitry, I am inclined to trust 99.9%

17.10.2013 11:38, Basil Sergienko:

Type incorrectly defined it-Pasiphila debiliata

17.10.2013 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subspecies Lethe vindhya luaba Corbet, 1941 det. Pozhogin D.

17.10.2013 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subspecies Lethe vindhya luaba Corbet, 1941 det. Pozhogin D.

17.10.2013 2:01, Sergei Kotov:

Dichrorampha simpliciana (Haworth 1811) (in the ill-defined)

17.10.2013 0:52, Peter Khramov:

What a nice gizmo. Just as it is a poison.

17.10.2013 0:52, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zophodia grossulariella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

16.10.2013 10:37, Sergei Kotov:

Zophodia grossulariella (Hubner, 1809)

16.10.2013 3:18, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia ochridata / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

15.10.2013 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I corrected today.

15.10.2013 21:33, Alex Dumchus:

Well, if not you, then who is the same ??? At the weekend to revise uncertain of SE Asia and lay out can help

15.10.2013 21:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, on the page http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/2852 school, about the food caterpillars honey, it is necessary to remove it. :)

15.10.2013 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Theretra, however. Also there I think I have it. Moroka them .....

15.10.2013 19:50, Alex Dumchus:

Good wings raised, "Mamma Mia!" :))

15.10.2013 19:38, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. Look, it's not Cechenena it? There is a copy, a little lighter with a lot of yellow on the rear fenders.

15.10.2013 13:23, Sergei Kotov:

If this photo shows the same butterfly, as in the photo # 13109, it is - Eupithecia ochridata (in the ill-defined).

15.10.2013 13:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caligo oileus / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

15.10.2013 12:51, Sergei Kotov:

Caligo oileus C. & R. Felder, 1861 (in the ill-defined)

15.10.2013 12:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia abbreviata / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

15.10.2013 11:37, Sergei Kotov:

Eupithecia abbreviata Stephens, 1831 (in the ill-defined)

15.10.2013 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As many as 2 found missing (though the quality .....). Is it in the field. Here Map: http://www.sphin-sea.unibas.ch/SphinSEA/species%20pages/Hi_celerio.htm

15.10.2013 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hippotion celerio / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.10.2013 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hippotion celerio / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.10.2013 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eupithecia ochridata / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

15.10.2013 2:16, Peter Khramov:

But why from the bulldozer. In fact, and it features all of the case that the only correct system to be seen ...

15.10.2013 2:15, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Hippotion celerio / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус Hippotion eson / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

15.10.2013 0:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

it would be necessary to move this photo, the atoms somehow wrong :)

14.10.2013 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This nominative: Clanis undulosa undulosa Moore, 1879
Soon upload subspecies: Clanis undulosa gigantea Rothschild, 1894.
Quite different looks.

14.10.2013 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OrHippotion esonTanzania and this is like him.

14.10.2013 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Unfortunately, so far the only kind I have.

14.10.2013 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to remove uncertainty.
It's not him. This here: http://www.biodiversityexplorer.org/lepidoptera/sphingidae/hippotion_celerio.htm
Only one picture here of adults correctly

14.10.2013 21:17, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I will do all modders and believed juzverej.

14.10.2013 21:16, Peter Khramov:

Now Fautua uploaded to your geography "Malaysia, Pahang, Fraser's Hill, Silverpark, 3.42'54.81" N 101.44'07.65 "E Alt. = 1285m. Leg. Vishnyakov AN", all the rules. As will still go wrong, call me right away, try to place tinkered what was going on.

14.10.2013 21:11, Peter Khramov:

But gipatonov we really little. Citizens! Who has gipatony! Take some time to download the corresponding ph, and almost the whole race is not complete: - ((

14.10.2013 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It appears when downloading the new photons with the same soprovodilovka flies. Who I threw another hawk and flew again.

14.10.2013 18:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, a subspecies. And biolibe subspecies some reason like certain types of cost: http://www.biolib.cz/en/formsearch/?action=execute&searcharea=1&string=Amplypterus
Neponyatki biolibom with this: a campaign "from the bulldozer" there infa written.

14.10.2013 17:37, Peter Khramov:

Well so it is now something like it right? ZY By which, in the LC? If not in LC - write in the system area, the topic for the glitches personal account.

14.10.2013 17:35, Peter Khramov:

Duc there seems to be 2 types just like something that ...

14.10.2013 15:11, Sergei Kotov:

Eupithecia ochridata Schutze & Pinker, 1968 (in the ill-defined)

14.10.2013 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, there is a desire to add something which subspecies. Can you give me this opportunity?

14.10.2013 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Zophodia grossulariella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 14:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 14:38, Sergei Kotov:

Zophodia grossulariella (Hubner, 1809)

14.10.2013 14:37, Sergei Kotov:

Hypena rostralis (Linnaeus, 1758)

14.10.2013 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia pyralella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 14:20, Sergei Kotov:

Scoparia pyralella (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (in the ill-defined)

14.10.2013 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

After the transfer, refresh the page, and the second time turned comments.

14.10.2013 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.10.2013 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paradiarsia punicea / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 12:55, Sergei Kotov:

Paradiarsia punicea (Hubner, [1803])

14.10.2013 12:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Metzneria lappella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 12:19, Sergei Kotov:

Metzneria lappella (Linnaeus 1758) (in the ill-defined)

14.10.2013 12:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter glucan: flies a precise indication of geography.
For example, in the morning and it was edited http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23950 normal "Malaysia, Pahang, Fraser's Hill, Silverpark, 3.42'54.81" N 101.44'07.65 "E Alt. = 1285m. Leg. Vishnyakov AN", and later I looked again-and flew was "Malaysia, Pahang, Fraser's Hill, Silverpark, 3.42'54.81" (shortened). Tweak as possible.

14.10.2013 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

14.10.2013 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

14.10.2013 11:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

14.10.2013 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypena rostralis / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

14.10.2013 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my opinion, the site is now assembled the whole race finally.

14.10.2013 10:45, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.10.2013 10:45, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.10.2013 10:45, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.10.2013 10:45, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.10.2013 8:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something podglyukivaet (label again, not until the end of registers). So now I finished writing and like normal again.

14.10.2013 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.10.2013 7:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

14.10.2013 7:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Coleophora deauratella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 0:59, Sergei Kotov:

Coleophora deauratella Lienig & Zeller 1846 (in the ill-defined)

14.10.2013 0:49, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Platyptilia gonodactyla / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 0:49, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Platyptilia gonodactyla / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 0:49, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Catarhoe rubidata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

14.10.2013 0:33, Sergei Kotov:

Platyptilia gonodactyla (Denis & Schiffermüller 1775) (in the ill-defined)

14.10.2013 0:33, Sergei Kotov:

Platyptilia gonodactyla (Denis & Schiffermüller 1775) (in the ill-defined)

14.10.2013 0:31, Sergei Kotov:

Catarhoe rubidata (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

14.10.2013 0:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bryotropha terrella / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

13.10.2013 23:04, Sergei Kotov:

Bryotropha terrella (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) (in the ill-defined)

13.10.2013 14:24, Peter Khramov:

What a pleasant thing. And geography is not pumped.

13.10.2013 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually here is the link: http://en.butterflycorner.net/Graphium-meyeri.536.0.html
Yes, and there's just indomalaysky region. For some reason, it would not be in Malaysia? Because insects are not strictly adhere to the borders drawn by man :)

12.10.2013 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow, I will throw the reference (now I am not able to work) which identifies. By habit he's one to one.

12.10.2013 8:45, Alex Dumchus:

Still meyeri. What about the range?

12.10.2013 8:29, Alex Dumchus:

On this page I determined, but Trunks so similar that it is difficult to determine the type. In addition, habitats overlap. Therefore, yet sfotayu and lay out.

12.10.2013 5:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Useful links on the Asian revelers: http://www.sphin-sea.unibas.ch/SphinSEA/SphinSEA_speclist.htm

12.10.2013 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not at all, Alexander. Take a look her here: http://www.sphin-sea.unibas.ch/SphinSEA/SphinSEA_speclist.htm
Just now, I correct his Malaysian (30 pieces indefinite recently broke off), well digging and passing.

11.10.2013 21:48, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you. Vasily, I have a dozen Makroglossumov from Indonesia, one Fautua I gave, and identified as Macroglossum pyrrhosticta, but I'm not sure. Perhaps the weekend will put more foty, can you identify?

11.10.2013 21:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acosmeryx sericeus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

11.10.2013 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Apotomis betuletana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

11.10.2013 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polypogon tentacularia / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

11.10.2013 8:31, Sergei Kotov:

Apotomis betuletana (Haworth, 1811) (in the ill-defined).

11.10.2013 8:27, Sergei Kotov:

Well, it's all simple :)
Polypogon tentacularius (Linnaeus, 1758)
I do not know why it is still not determined :)

11.10.2013 2:28, Peter Khramov:

Something I have big doubts ... But in the absence of other options ...

11.10.2013 2:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ostrinia nubilalis / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

11.10.2013 2:13, Sergei Kotov:

Ostrinia nubilalis (in the ill-defined)

11.10.2013 1:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

11.10.2013 1:03, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celypha lacunana / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 23:46, Sergei Kotov:

Usual Celypha lacunana (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

10.10.2013 23:46, Sergei Kotov:

Celypha lacunana (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

10.10.2013 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It seems like in Italy and Greece have. And there is not far, and Croatia. Probably, that is. If it is in the photo, of course.

10.10.2013 22:26, Peter Khramov:

And it is found in the bed did?

10.10.2013 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is the same moth as the one on photo #9906, so I moved it to confidently identified

10.10.2013 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Pandesma robusta / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

10.10.2013 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified → Pandesma robusta / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

10.10.2013 21:48, Sergei Kotov:

It seems very much like Pandesma robusta (Walker, 1858) (Erebidae: Catocalinae).

10.10.2013 21:48, Sergei Kotov:

Pandesma robusta (Walker, 1858) (Erebidae: Catocalinae)

10.10.2013 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.10.2013 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.10.2013 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea fucosa / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea fucosa / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amphipoea fucosa / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 19:50, Sergei Kotov:

Amphipoea fucosa (in the ill-defined)

10.10.2013 19:50, Sergei Kotov:

Amphipoea fucosa (in the ill-defined)

10.10.2013 19:50, Sergei Kotov:

Amphipoea fucosa (in the ill-defined)

10.10.2013 19:50, Sergei Kotov:

Amphipoea fucosa (in the ill-defined)

10.10.2013 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Zhdems!

10.10.2013 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cerura vinula / Confidently identified / Maxim Schwarz.

10.10.2013 18:48, Sergei Kotov:

And this is why so far undetermined ??? ...
For a long time already has been determined.

10.10.2013 17:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For a long time I have not loaded on truck here. Now the stage raspravki N-ing number of Malaysian hawk moths. It is necessary to identify and shipping. Matter of time :)

10.10.2013 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amata phegea / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Amata phegea / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 17:40, Sergei Kotov:

Very similar to the Amata phegea (Linnaeus, 1758). I proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Amata phegea.

10.10.2013 17:38, Sergei Kotov:

I proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Amata phegea.

10.10.2013 16:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please postponed to the form, and then once in lux at sub-rules (finished writing) "Comment author" Well, when you hover the mouse on the photo and left "view is not defined" in fact defined and transferred. I had to repeat the transfer.

10.10.2013 16:27, Peter Khramov:

Basil seems to have a bug with the transfer. What data do you change that was displayed so? Or does not change?)

10.10.2013 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.10.2013 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.10.2013 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

10.10.2013 15:04, Peter Khramov:

Aah. When I tuplyu. Krut: -)

10.10.2013 14:09, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Sergei Kotov, thanks for the definition! I am still worried that this one does not recognize krasava. In fact, these caterpillars look more impressive when picked up his head in an attitude of fear and these huge "big eyes" looking right at you. But specifically, the individual does not wish to alarm anyone, not even to represent fear. :)

10.10.2013 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I had in mind that the author of the photo is one of pervoopisateley kind :)

10.10.2013 13:32, Peter Khramov:

That's because gloza gloza!

10.10.2013 13:30, Peter Khramov:

I drew attention to the description of the year ...

10.10.2013 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just-fire is dragged them inaccurate.

10.10.2013 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.10.2013 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.10.2013 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.10.2013 13:09, Sergei Kotov:

Well, maybe not ora ...
But I find this butterfly is very similar to the ora appears.

10.10.2013 12:46, Svetlana Shchavelina:

On molbiole written: "Phalera ora Schintlmeister, 1989 found only in south-western China - Yunnan and Sichuan" http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t184446-400.html
Nakhon Si Thammarat - Southern Thailand is almost the same latitude as the well-known Phuket (from the other side of the Malay Peninsula, and a little posevernee).

10.10.2013 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Imbrasia epimethea / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

10.10.2013 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema hecabe / Tentatively identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

10.10.2013 11:50, Sergei Kotov:

Keep Dmitry. Imbrasia epimethea.

10.10.2013 11:48, Sergei Kotov:

The ill-defined.

10.10.2013 11:48, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

10.10.2013 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalera ora / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 11:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalera ora / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phalera ora / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 11:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Theretra pallicosta / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anuga indigofera / Tentatively identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

10.10.2013 11:24, Sergei Kotov:

Phalera ora Schintlmeister, 1989

10.10.2013 11:23, Sergei Kotov:

Phalera ora Schintlmeister, 1989

10.10.2013 11:23, Sergei Kotov:

Phalera ora Schintlmeister, 1989

10.10.2013 10:46, Sergei Kotov:

Theretra pallicosta (Walker, 1856)

10.10.2013 10:21, Sergei Kotov:

It's just kind of Anuga.
Well, in principle, this can be transferred to imprecisely defined Anuga indigofera.

10.10.2013 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite difficult to find the form, but nevertheless, I drove it in the classification. Not only is the author a remarkable photos on quality ...... so also pay attention to the names pervoopisateley species. It is a sin to keep these kinds of undefined!

10.10.2013 3:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima phalonia / Tentatively identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

10.10.2013 3:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

10.10.2013 3:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cnaemidophorus rhododactyla / Confidently identified / Александр Юрочкин.

10.10.2013 3:11, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Ypthima argus.

10.10.2013 3:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nygmia plana / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

10.10.2013 3:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pachliopta aristolochiae.

10.10.2013 3:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

10.10.2013 3:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

10.10.2013 3:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima pandocus / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

10.10.2013 3:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Euploea core / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

10.10.2013 3:09, Peter Khramov:

Confirmation of the genus or species?

10.10.2013 3:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia basistrigalis / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

10.10.2013 2:32, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

10.10.2013 2:29, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

10.10.2013 2:29, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

10.10.2013 2:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

10.10.2013 2:23, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

10.10.2013 2:22, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

10.10.2013 2:20, Sergei Kotov:

Scoparia basistrigalis (Knaggs, 1866)

09.10.2013 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia almana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2013 23:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ectropis crepuscularia / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

09.10.2013 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scopula nigropunctata / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

09.10.2013 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias libythea / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2013 23:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Appias libythea / Confidently identified / Female / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2013 23:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dercas lycorias / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2013 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dercas lycorias / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2013 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyssa zampa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2013 23:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyssa zampa / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2013 23:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia almana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

09.10.2013 23:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Jodis lactearia / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

09.10.2013 23:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Agrochola circellaris / Tentatively identified / Igor Sakhno Helicoverpa armigera / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

09.10.2013 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hyphoraia aulica / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

09.10.2013 21:29, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

09.10.2013 21:29, Sergei Kotov:

Agree to Fedor is S. nigropunctata

09.10.2013 20:29, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Ectropis crepuscularia

09.10.2013 20:27, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Scopula nigropunctata

09.10.2013 20:09, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula corrivalaria (KRETSCHMAR, 1862)?

09.10.2013 19:08, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with another photo of the same individual.

09.10.2013 19:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema hecabe / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

09.10.2013 19:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eurema hecabe / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

09.10.2013 19:07, Peter Khramov:

ABOUT! What people are without protection! Really tyrnet got up, Dime?

09.10.2013 16:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I assume Eudocima phalonia

09.10.2013 16:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Appias libythea zhenstchina

09.10.2013 16:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dercas lycorias

09.10.2013 16:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema hecabe

09.10.2013 16:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema xantochlora pomponia (Hopffer, 1874), to see the underside

09.10.2013 16:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nyctalemon (Lyssa) zampa

09.10.2013 16:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nyctalemon (Lyssa) zampa

09.10.2013 16:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

almana

09.10.2013 12:08, Sergei Kotov:

Jodis lactearia (Linnaeus, 1758)

09.10.2013 8:21, Fyodor Pudovikov:

indeed, armigera

08.10.2013 23:48, Sergei Kotov:

Hyphoraia aulica

08.10.2013 23:40, Sergei Kotov:

No! In fact, in this photo - Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner, 1808) !!!

08.10.2013 10:36, Peter Khramov:

Well, then, the next will be a rarity for sure ...

08.10.2013 0:06, Sergei Kotov:

Scary exceedingly Bananas!
This year ate the whole mountain ash in the city. And at the same time all the hawthorn and cherry.

07.10.2013 22:08, Sergei Kotov:

Autographa gamma (Linnaeus, 1758) (in the ill-defined)

07.10.2013 22:06, Sergei Kotov:

Smerinthus ocellatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (in the ill-defined)

07.10.2013 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phigalia pilosaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

07.10.2013 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phigalia pilosaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

07.10.2013 21:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Phigalia pilosaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

07.10.2013 16:45, Sergei Kotov:

Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

07.10.2013 16:45, Sergei Kotov:

Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

07.10.2013 16:45, Sergei Kotov:

Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)

07.10.2013 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyommatus icarus / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

07.10.2013 15:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let's wait until transferring.

07.10.2013 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calophasia lunula / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

07.10.2013 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Calophasia lunula / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

07.10.2013 11:22, Sergei Kotov:

Calophasia lunula (Hufnagel, 1766)

07.10.2013 11:21, Sergei Kotov:

I agree with the author.
Cnaemidophorus rhododactylus (in the ill-defined).

07.10.2013 11:19, Sergei Kotov:

If this photo shows the same butterfly, as in the photo # 10186 by the same author, it is likely Colias hyale

07.10.2013 11:16, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775)

07.10.2013 11:14, Sergei Kotov:

Calophasia lunula (Hufnagel, 1766)

07.10.2013 6:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sarbanissa transiens / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.10.2013 3:12, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with other fotami autologous.

07.10.2013 3:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphelia paleana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

07.10.2013 3:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphelia paleana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

07.10.2013 3:12, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aphelia paleana / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

07.10.2013 3:08, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

07.10.2013 3:08, Sergei Kotov:

picture author correctly identified

07.10.2013 3:07, Sergei Kotov:

Aphelia paleana (Hubner, 1793)

07.10.2013 1:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia ambigualis / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

07.10.2013 1:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scoparia ambigualis / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 23:21, Sergei Kotov:

Scoparia ambigualis (Treitschke, 1829) (in the ill-defined)

06.10.2013 23:21, Sergei Kotov:

Scoparia ambigualis (Treitschke, 1829) (in the ill-defined)

06.10.2013 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sciota adelphella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sciota adelphella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Sciota adelphella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 20:00, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

06.10.2013 20:00, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

06.10.2013 20:00, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

06.10.2013 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chilo phragmitella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 17:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chilo phragmitella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 17:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Chilo phragmitella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 15:09, Sergei Kotov:

All right, it Chilo phragmitella (Hubner, [1805])

06.10.2013 15:09, Sergei Kotov:

All right, it Chilo phragmitella (Hubner, [1805])

06.10.2013 15:08, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, it Chilo phragmitella (Hubner, [1805])

06.10.2013 13:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gortyna flavago / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 13:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gortyna flavago / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 13:46, Sergei Kotov:

Gortyna flavago (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (in the ill-defined)

06.10.2013 13:46, Sergei Kotov:

Gortyna flavago (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) (in the ill-defined)

06.10.2013 13:16, Sergei Kotov:

OK, sorry for the impatient. Uchtu on future developments.

06.10.2013 12:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergei is a matter of drag and drop to the species involved in two very live person: Peter and me. "Robot" is not present here, and everything is done "by hand". Therefore, the delay in transferring the quite obvious and inevitable. It is to the last comment :)

06.10.2013 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gillmeria pallidactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 12:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gillmeria pallidactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gillmeria pallidactyla / Tentatively identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

06.10.2013 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia nebulosa / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polia nebulosa / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

06.10.2013 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macaria signaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 12:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macaria signaria / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 12:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agonopterix heracliana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

06.10.2013 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Clostera curtula.

06.10.2013 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

06.10.2013 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Clostera curtula / Confidently identified / Sergey Kotov.

06.10.2013 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria leucocephala / Tentatively identified / .

06.10.2013 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria leucocephala / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Depressaria leucocephala / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

06.10.2013 11:15, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:15, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:14, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:14, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:14, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:14, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:14, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:14, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:14, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:13, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:13, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:13, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:13, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

06.10.2013 11:13, Sergei Kotov:

Wrap will or not?

05.10.2013 18:36, Alex Dumchus:

Photo 23868

05.10.2013 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wonderful pics! Would make up worthful illustrations to a good atlas of Charaxes. Many thanks to the author!

05.10.2013 16:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Aporia larraldei / Confidently identified / Alexandr Dumchus.

05.10.2013 16:10, Alex Dumchus:

limenitis helmanni?

05.10.2013 16:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Marija Jaunkunga.

05.10.2013 16:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Marija Jaunkunga.

05.10.2013 16:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

They have already identified the author (comments): Returns the definition.

05.10.2013 16:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Marija Jaunkunga.

05.10.2013 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agonopterix heracliana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agonopterix heracliana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agonopterix heracliana / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vitula edmandsii / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vitula edmandsii / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vitula edmandsii / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais urticae / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 15:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais urticae / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Aglais urticae / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 15:58, Alex Dumchus:

aporia larraldei

05.10.2013 15:55, Alex Dumchus:

Aporia bieti?

05.10.2013 14:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here's the underside.
Sure it differs a bit from our local in Podmoskovye, but looks quite similar.

05.10.2013 14:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside should be theirs.

05.10.2013 12:41, Alex Dumchus:

She no longer available to me J.almana of Taya and rear wings are much darker

05.10.2013 12:25, Alex Dumchus:

Argynome laodice, the female?

05.10.2013 12:22, Alex Dumchus:

Argynome laodice, male?

05.10.2013 0:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epirrita autumnata / Tentatively identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 0:48, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Idaea aversata / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

05.10.2013 0:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

05.10.2013 0:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cricula trifenestrata / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

04.10.2013 23:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plebejus argus / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

04.10.2013 23:15, Irina Nikulina:

It turns out that the first assumption was true) Thank you, Sergei. It is necessary to carry, I guess. And more in the future, if not more difficult, while Idas that biotope than differs significantly from that of the Argus?

04.10.2013 23:02, Alex Dumchus:

Samia insularis, write that in Sumatra there is only this kind, although I think it is more for insularis dark, errors can take snapshots?

04.10.2013 22:52, Alex Dumchus:

Cricula trifenestrata (Helfer, 1837), female

04.10.2013 21:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hofmannophila pseudospretella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.10.2013 21:31, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hofmannophila pseudospretella / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

04.10.2013 17:58, Sergei Kotov:

Aglais urticae (Linnaeus, 1758)

04.10.2013 17:58, Sergei Kotov:

Aglais urticae (Linnaeus, 1758)

04.10.2013 17:58, Sergei Kotov:

Aglais urticae (Linnaeus, 1758)

04.10.2013 17:49, Sergei Kotov:

Vitula edmandsii (PACKARD, 1864)

04.10.2013 17:49, Sergei Kotov:

Vitula edmandsii (PACKARD, 1864)

04.10.2013 17:49, Sergei Kotov:

Vitula edmandsii (PACKARD, 1864)

04.10.2013 17:18, Sergei Kotov:

Most likely, Agonopterix heracliana (in the ill-defined).

04.10.2013 17:18, Sergei Kotov:

Most likely, Agonopterix heracliana (in the ill-defined).

04.10.2013 17:18, Sergei Kotov:

Most likely, Agonopterix heracliana (in the ill-defined).

04.10.2013 17:16, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, it Hofmannophila pseudospretella, all right.

04.10.2013 17:16, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, it Hofmannophila pseudospretella, all right.

04.10.2013 17:10, Sergei Kotov:

Idaea aversata (Linnaeus, 1758)

04.10.2013 15:24, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argyresthia conjugella / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

04.10.2013 14:42, Sergei Kotov:

Argyresthia conjugella Zeller, 1839

04.10.2013 14:23, Sergei Kotov:

Depressaria leucocephala (in the ill-defined)

04.10.2013 14:23, Sergei Kotov:

Depressaria leucocephala (in the ill-defined)

04.10.2013 14:22, Sergei Kotov:

Depressaria leucocephala (in the ill-defined)

04.10.2013 14:00, Sergei Kotov:

Clostera curtula (in the ill-defined).

04.10.2013 14:00, Sergei Kotov:

Clostera curtula (in the ill-defined)

04.10.2013 13:58, Sergei Kotov:

In this case the most likely Plebejus argus it.

04.10.2013 13:40, Irina Nikulina:

Edge of mixed forest, Sergey

04.10.2013 13:29, Sergei Kotov:

Agonopterix heracliana (in the ill-defined).

04.10.2013 13:26, Sergei Kotov:

Macaria signaria (Hubner, 1809)

04.10.2013 13:26, Sergei Kotov:

Macaria signaria (Hubner, 1809)

04.10.2013 13:26, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, it Macaria signaria (Hubner, 1809). You can move in precisely defined.

04.10.2013 12:29, Sergei Kotov:

And in what biotope was made this picture?

04.10.2013 12:28, Sergei Kotov:

Polia nebulosa (Hufnagel, 1766)

04.10.2013 12:28, Sergei Kotov:

Polia nebulosa (Hufnagel, 1766)

04.10.2013 12:16, Irina Nikulina:

October on the yard) may be returning from the fields prompt anything?)

04.10.2013 11:34, Sergei Kotov:

My opinion - Epirrita autumnata (in the ill-defined).

04.10.2013 11:26, Sergei Kotov:

I agree with an author photo, most likely it Gillmeria pallidactyla (proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Gillmeria pallidactyla).

04.10.2013 11:25, Sergei Kotov:

I agree with an author photo, most likely it Gillmeria pallidactyla (proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Gillmeria pallidactyla).

04.10.2013 11:25, Sergei Kotov:

I agree with an author phot, most likely it Gillmeria pallidactyla (proposed to be moved inaccurately defined Gillmeria pallidactyla).

04.10.2013 7:56, Alex Dumchus:

Over the weekend, throw

04.10.2013 5:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Laothoe amurensis / Татьяна Гордеева Laothoe populi / Sergei Kotov.

04.10.2013 2:55, Peter Khramov:

It seems that some long-deferred foty again fall into uncertain. Gluck chtol what ... Did not I will seek.

04.10.2013 2:52, Peter Khramov:

Basil did so by default radiobaton was precisely defined. So really it is more convenient, he run up a couple of times, I forgot to put it. But now we have to be careful that you just do not do not send: -) On the other hand, everything is always fixable.
ZYLord users admitted to this subject, the test went well, you can now expand the circle of those who have the right to transfer to the kinds of photons. Write who is finished.I recall that the new responsibilities it will not add, but if you have time to edit or simply will pass not carried over foty - will be able to move, and timeouts with translations have declined even more.

04.10.2013 0:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Plagodis pulveraria / Vitaly Gumenuk Odontopera bidentata / Fyodor Pudovikov.

04.10.2013 0:09, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Петр Храмов.

04.10.2013 0:09, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, still not that cool?

04.10.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov:

Strange glitch. Two times in a row and at the same fote ...

04.10.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Celastrina argiolus / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

04.10.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Pontia edusa / Tentatively identified / Петр Храмов Euchloe ausonia / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

04.10.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Spatalia argentina / Vitaly Gumenuk Notodonta ziczac / Andrey Ponomarev.

04.10.2013 0:06, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Macroglossum stellatarum / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

03.10.2013 23:39, Sergei Kotov:

Firstly, the shape of the wings. At the edge of the front wing amurensis with teeth, but they are more gentle and there is clearly a remarkable deepening. In populi edge of the wing again with teeth, but they are sharp (not flat) and arranged uniformly, without any kind, whatsoever recesses and curvatures.In this case, the teeth on the edge of the front wing of the uniform and pronounced, that is consistent populi. Secondly, painting and drawing. In amurensis monochrome painting, ash - gray transverse bands are mild, not clearly. In populi painting a brighter picture and a transverse bands clearly visible.In addition, populi white spot in the middle of the front wing is rounder and thicker. Amurensis Y is narrower and more elongated along the length of the strip-shaped. In this case, the color of butterflies and even an ash-gray shades (which led to the misconception that it is supposedly amurensis, instead populi), but the figure does not correspond to amurensis.Transverse stripes crisp, well visible white spot in the center of the front wing a thick, oval-shaped (rather than thin, elongate in the form of strips). Thus, the color of the butterfly as shown in the photo, is fully consistent with the phenotype Laothoe populi. For even more convincing compare this image with photographs, which really shows Laothoe amurensis.For example, on a page of the form Laothoe amurensis open link 'All pictures of this type in a large amount on the same page "and compare that controversial photo with pictures, which show exactly amurensis (all displayed around, on one page, and it will be convenient to compare). Then all doubts will disappear immediately.

03.10.2013 22:58, Peter Khramov:

There captions fote is always a reference to the artist's page. The numbers at the end of the reference - that is Id. And if the author does not need and none of the commentators (though what for?) The section the authors have a complete list, there are also references to the Id.

03.10.2013 22:27, Sergei Kotov:

Yes definitely Odontopera bidentata (Clerck, 1759) it is!

03.10.2013 22:23, Sergei Kotov:

All right, Celastrina argiolus it. Why is still in uncertain?

03.10.2013 22:22, Sergei Kotov:

All right, Celastrina argiolus it. Why is still in uncertain?

03.10.2013 22:22, Sergei Kotov:

It Euchloe ausonia!

03.10.2013 22:14, Sergei Kotov:

It is without doubt Notodonta ziczac!

03.10.2013 22:10, Sergei Kotov:

Why still hangs in uncertain?

03.10.2013 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Yponomeuta malinellus / Confidently identified / Vlad Proklov.

03.10.2013 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pheosia tremula / Петр Храмов Pheosia gnoma / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.10.2013 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acleris forsskaleana / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.10.2013 22:02, Sergei Kotov:

Why this photo is still on the page tremula? They said the same had it's Pheosia gnoma.

03.10.2013 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epicallima formosella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.10.2013 22:00, Sergei Kotov:

Still hangs in uncertain and should be transferred to the Yponomeuta malinella.

03.10.2013 22:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cameraria ohridella / Confidently identified / Sergey Novitckiy.

03.10.2013 21:55, Sergei Kotov:

Why is still in uncertain?

03.10.2013 21:54, Sergei Kotov:

Why still hangs in uncertain?

03.10.2013 21:53, Sergei Kotov:

Why still hangs in uncertain?

03.10.2013 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sergey, thank you for help :)

03.10.2013 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

03.10.2013 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pontia edusa / Петр Храмов Euchloe ausonia / Sergei Kotov.

03.10.2013 21:26, Sergei Kotov:

Euchloe ausonia without a doubt.

03.10.2013 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You can not just keep track of everything that's happening brakes.

03.10.2013 21:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Pheosia tremula / Петр Храмов Pheosia gnoma / Alexandr Zhakov.

03.10.2013 21:14, Sergei Kotov:

Generally it Pheosia gnoma. Wrap will or not?

03.10.2013 21:13, Sergei Kotov:

Generally it Pheosia gnoma. Wrap will or not?

03.10.2013 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Why you are alone? People seem to be quite a unsubscribe comments. Or are you talking about?

03.10.2013 21:07, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Boloria selene / Imago / Юрий Карпов Boloria euphrosyne / Female / Sergei Kotov.

03.10.2013 20:49, Sergei Kotov:

No! It Clossiana euphrosyne (Linnaeus, 1758), female.

03.10.2013 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What is the rationale?

03.10.2013 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Note is taken into account :) Oh, clean up, to more joint efforts "Augean stables" of uncertainty. Sutured one ........

03.10.2013 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I'm at is not on the definition, but in general, the history. They say that time flies quickly.

03.10.2013 20:32, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Sergei Kotov Alexsandr Martukov.

03.10.2013 19:44, Sergei Kotov:

No! It Laothoe populi (Linnaeus, 1758).

03.10.2013 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No wonder: in these two kinds of many confused ....... And Sergei respect.

03.10.2013 19:11, Peter Khramov:

About how. 4 and a half years have passed since the definition of Basil.

03.10.2013 19:10, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Lasiommata maera / Vasiliy Feoktistov Lasiommata petropolitana / Sergei Kotov.

03.10.2013 18:33, Sergei Kotov:

This is exactly Lasiommata petropolitana (note the picture of the rear wings and the time of shooting).

03.10.2013 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Episteme maculatrix / Confidently identified / Svetlana Shchavelina.

03.10.2013 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is: Now bear.

03.10.2013 18:01, Svetlana Shchavelina:

And my # 22373 - too it?

03.10.2013 16:43, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you!

03.10.2013 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio bianor Papilio polyctor.

03.10.2013 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Papilio bianor Papilio polyctor.

03.10.2013 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.mothsofborneo.com/

03.10.2013 16:09, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. I want to ask - in some sites is determined by Lyssa? I have a couple of uncertain from Vietnam. One of these days I will give the photo.

03.10.2013 16:07, Alex Dumchus:

Snow was falling. It is not Bianor. It Papilio polyctor stocleyi. Bring your please and underside too.

03.10.2013 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UPD; I returned the definition itself.

03.10.2013 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov John Moore.

03.10.2013 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, if you can send me a list with an ID of all users (even has no commentary).
For example, for this image: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21103 nakosyachil I park the day, and return to an author he can not: there is his ID.

03.10.2013 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, John Moore correct definition for this fote. I made a mess of moving this butterfly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23808

03.10.2013 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.10.2013 12:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Episteme maculatrix / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2013 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

03.10.2013 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

John Moore Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2013 8:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Nyctemera coleta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2013 8:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Polyura narcaeus / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

03.10.2013 8:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyssa zampa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2013 8:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lyssa zampa / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.10.2013 8:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eudocima sp. Facing a loss.

03.10.2013 8:23, Alex Dumchus:

Est.23637

03.10.2013 0:47, Peter Khramov:

He spoke in English. I do not really, it is not so, and we communicate: -)

02.10.2013 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima homaena / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.10.2013 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eudocima salaminia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.10.2013 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Asota sp. Before type alas: it hurts badly broken life.

02.10.2013 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The top is?

02.10.2013 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota caricae / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.10.2013 20:17, Alex Dumchus:

Yeah. With classification morphs full zh..Komu believe? Here is another example!: Some write M.uraneis eugenia, others vice versa - eugenia uraneis ..

02.10.2013 20:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On biolibe muddy everything with granadensis (incomplete name): I suspect there is a blooper, but with deidamia everything is normal.
Compare for yourself:
http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id405173/
http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id405171/

02.10.2013 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumorpha pandorus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.10.2013 15:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Malay probably :)
Sumatra once again on the Malay spelled Sumatera: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D1%F3%EC%E0%F2%F0%E0
For example: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23827

02.10.2013 15:22, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. What language chat? In Indonesia, which in the course? They're English is not so ... :))

02.10.2013 15:17, Alex Dumchus:

Glad you finally got the connection. Whilst it's an individual species in Biolib, M.violaceus is not a species at all but an M.helenor subspecies.

02.10.2013 15:05, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I put myself checkbox in the near future will try to do.

02.10.2013 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Although the head can break these "commercial" Morfidov: Wait endure. Wait necessary that someone else said their opinions.

02.10.2013 14:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now I drag it to deidamia. And the name Morpho deidamia granadensis C. Felder & R. Felder, 1867 at Alexander could finish in the LC, a blank line under the name of the species.

02.10.2013 14:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

deidamia, however. What a fuss: http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/morpho_deidamia_granadensis_types.htm
P.S. Inet made: rad!

02.10.2013 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

02.10.2013 12:27, Sergei Kotov:

This is exactly notha.

02.10.2013 12:24, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

02.10.2013 11:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, of course =)
I generally turn the wallpaper :)

02.10.2013 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

02.10.2013 11:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota plana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.10.2013 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All the butterflies after hatching have to get somewhere (in this case, curtain) that no interference had dried and straightened wings.

02.10.2013 7:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota plana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.10.2013 7:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Asota plana / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

02.10.2013 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then I try perensti where he wanted: a pancake, cable somewhere in the entrance-apechalno killed. Through cell phone as a modem to try ......

02.10.2013 0:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Ok!

01.10.2013 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Fast forward to indefinite those who have been designated a family.

01.10.2013 17:44, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. I give another link to morph. Boudin Internet, see: http: //stembol.com/morphidae/morpho/family_morphidae.htm

01.10.2013 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I am sureAsota plana
Only here do not know, it is necessary to transfer these photos, or not? By the way: it is necessary to remove the inscription "Noctuidae" from the title and moved to the uncertain picture with all these labels because they do not appear there.

01.10.2013 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm currently out of the internet connection (now connecting through my phone, don't want to risk anything), after I've got good connection, maybe really put this as an individual species?

01.10.2013 7:42, Shamil Murtazin:

blinds like? =)

01.10.2013 1:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ethmia bipunctella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

01.10.2013 1:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ethmia bipunctella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

01.10.2013 1:04, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2013 19:53, Peter Khramov:

The question remains open with synonyms.

30.09.2013 19:52, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Rhyacionia buoliana / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Rhyacionia pinicolana / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

30.09.2013 19:52, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Rhyacionia buoliana / Tentatively identified / Vitaly Gumenuk Rhyacionia pinicolana / Confidently identified / Andrey Ponomarev.

30.09.2013 19:50, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with other photos from the same individual.

30.09.2013 19:50, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica amelia / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Pretty boy.

30.09.2013 19:48, Peter Khramov:

I'm not about that: -) You have a phrase was such that someone ate it the enemy, Ana altsinoya. Like in a cartoon with "Eats, Blogs" about ...

30.09.2013 19:47, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Saturniidae / Imago / Yusri Syam Antheraea frithi / Female / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 19:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Saturniidae / Imago / Yusri Syam Cricula trifenestrata / Male / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 19:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Selenia dentaria / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

30.09.2013 19:46, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Selenia dentaria / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

30.09.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Selenia dentaria / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

30.09.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis camilla / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

30.09.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Limenitis camilla / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

30.09.2013 19:44, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Paradirphia lasiocampina / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 19:43, Peter Khramov:

Since comments are deleted if deleted phot, to which they were attached, the answer to the proposal to introduce a pre-moderation on foty in this topic.
I think that introduce moderated early: govnofoty normally removed after a short time after booting, and with their (govnofot) author I have further to communicate, to explain to him the situation.

30.09.2013 19:40, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Sphingidae / Yusri Syam → Acherontia lachesis / Alexandr Dumchus.

30.09.2013 18:34, Irina Nikulina:

Thank Ure. The network is not found, if You take in BPI, then will question)

30.09.2013 17:29, Alex Dumchus:

Paradirphia lasiocampina (C. & R. Felder, 1874)

30.09.2013 12:32, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2013 12:32, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2013 12:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2013 12:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2013 12:31, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2013 10:59, Yuri Semejkin:

On kirkazona Alcina also noted. Here is a link Yuri! As far as I know, such a picture, as you write, that is, crawl and pupate who where there and zimuyut.Mogut and kirkazona crust. It observed Omelko MM Read his article about biology altsinoya in the book "Biological research station on mountain taiga", 2006, № 10, p.186. The library BPI He is - VA

30.09.2013 9:46, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Selenia dentaria (Fabricius, 1775)

30.09.2013 9:46, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Selenia dentaria (Fabricius, 1775)

30.09.2013 9:46, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Selenia dentaria (Fabricius, 1775)

30.09.2013 9:41, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Limenitis camilla (Linnaeus, 1764)

30.09.2013 9:41, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Limenitis camilla (Linnaeus, 1764)

30.09.2013 8:33, Alex Dumchus:

Samia canningi?

30.09.2013 8:25, Alex Dumchus:

Cricula trifenestrata javana Watson, 1913, male, additional otvetstiya on the wings - no eyes, and the holes of the nails :)

30.09.2013 8:14, Alex Dumchus:

Antheraea frithii, female

30.09.2013 8:11, Alex Dumchus:

Acherontia lachesis

30.09.2013 8:09, Alex Dumchus:

If we focus on the site Biolib, then put a separate species

30.09.2013 5:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where to put it, then?

30.09.2013 5:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica amelia / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 4:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica marsolia / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Epiphile iblis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Dumchus.

30.09.2013 4:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Opoptera aorsa / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 4:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Opoptera aorsa / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxeoschistus pronax / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 4:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Oxeoschistus pronax / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

30.09.2013 0:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Probably for others. I can not do. There is only one way to find and grow

29.09.2013 22:52, Alex Dumchus:

Oxeoschistus pronax
(Hewitson, 1859)

29.09.2013 22:46, Alex Dumchus:

Corades enyo?

29.09.2013 22:33, Alex Dumchus:

Opoptera aorsa

29.09.2013 22:02, Alex Dumchus:

Epiphile lampethusa?

29.09.2013 21:57, Alex Dumchus:

Epiphile iblis

29.09.2013 21:44, Alex Dumchus:

Eunica marsolia fasula
Fruhstorfer, 1909

29.09.2013 21:28, Alex Dumchus:

Eunica amelia erroneata
Oberthür, 1916

29.09.2013 21:15, Alex Dumchus:

Neruda aoede cupidineus
(Stichel, 1906)

29.09.2013 20:58, Alex Dumchus:

Tithorea pacifica ??

29.09.2013 19:58, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, in Volodins definitions doubt difficult, he saw the caterpillars eltsizmy in nature and capture them. I have a 4 shot, which he made in 2010-11. But they look like caterpillars and painted just like here http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=ori2k&logNo=150125739212. And your http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/9488 on different looks ... (Though, it seems, also of Zygaenidae) Maybe all ages are they?

29.09.2013 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eacles imperialis / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

29.09.2013 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Epiphora ploetzi / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

29.09.2013 19:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Polyura narcaeus.

29.09.2013 17:23, Yuri Semejkin:

How else to call it? "From the point of view of" the former chrysalis - not well-wisher.

29.09.2013 17:23, Alex Dumchus:

Epiphora ploetzi

29.09.2013 17:19, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho granadensis, Felder

29.09.2013 17:18, Alex Dumchus:

Eacles imperialis

29.09.2013 17:13, Alex Dumchus:

Polyura narcaeus

29.09.2013 16:49, Peter Khramov:

Enemy?))

29.09.2013 16:24, Yuri Semejkin:

And altsinoya have enemies. One that's someone ate

29.09.2013 12:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Perhaps there is still However Elcysma westwoodii. He took on the feeding of a caterpillar, but failed to grow. Caterpillar defined Volodya. Here, the definition of disagree (listed in uncertain) http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 9488
True over time I began to have doubts, and kirkazona I took it, at this point kirkazon interspersed with drevogubtsem, so it can not survive, the food is not so.

29.09.2013 11:32, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, there is only one butterfly caterpillars that feed on the Manchurian Dutchman's pipe (as well as some others. Aristolohii kinds) - a sailboat Bhutanitis lidderdalii (Bhutan Glory), but he is not your place ... flies (habitat - Bhutan North India, Burma, Thailand and the border areas of China). So, most likely, it's someone crawling pupate on kirkazon)

29.09.2013 10:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks Basil!
I would not throw exuvium, but it was interesting. ..not So many caterpillars prefer kirkazon, though certainly not the fact that she fed him (could just pick on him a place to pupate). It can be the same for kirkazona narrow down the definition, personally I except altsinoya caterpillars that feed kirkazona, -dr just do not know.

29.09.2013 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is impossible to define in my opinion: but who knows? An empty shell of the pupa, by the way is called "exuvium."

29.09.2013 5:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Blank (shell) on a piece of doll Aristolochia manshuriensis

28.09.2013 23:54, Igor Sakhno:

Maybe Bella

28.09.2013 9:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, do it so that I have when migrating crow was precisely defined by default: if you forget to put a checkbox accurate / inaccurate picture and remains in uncertainty. After all, if you have any corrections, you can always drag inaccurate. It will be easier.

28.09.2013 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyclophora pendularia / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

28.09.2013 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More grades will be?

27.09.2013 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tortricidae

27.09.2013 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Crambidae

27.09.2013 22:45, Sergei Kotov:

And in fact, in the image nymph Smerinthus ocellatus!

27.09.2013 16:45, Irina Nikulina:

Not the best in quality picture, but decided to put, because Butterfly is a very rare, take a picture of it in the nature, especially the female - a great success, with a repeat of 2009 never failed. Besides female picture gallery yet. View - with a pronounced sexual dimorphism.

27.09.2013 2:30, Peter Khramov:

By analogy with the neighboring picture from the same individual.

27.09.2013 2:30, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Graphium chironides.

27.09.2013 2:30, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Graphium chironides.

27.09.2013 1:42, Peter Khramov:

And it all started so well ...

26.09.2013 20:19, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium chironides

26.09.2013 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, as it is already there and there. Or do you mean to send accurate?

26.09.2013 7:31, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

26.09.2013 7:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! Correct on Eunica chlorochroa!

25.09.2013 22:29, Svetlana Karaeva:

And yet, in naschem region, as I understand it, may well be Dyscia malatyana.

25.09.2013 22:26, Svetlana Karaeva:

According to Vasily Sergienko it may, Dyscia innocentaria. He says that it is necessary to cook for a more reliable determination of the type .. I have three copies of photos Dyscia, made this month, with a slightly different pattern on the wings.

25.09.2013 22:12, Svetlana Karaeva:

Thank you.

25.09.2013 13:20, Boris Novikov:

Suffice Prytkov :)

25.09.2013 13:19, Boris Novikov: This species is identified correctly.

25.09.2013 13:19, Boris Novikov:

Thank you! By comparing the images, I clearly made a mistake ...

25.09.2013 8:26, Fyodor Pudovikov:

It Scopula immutata

25.09.2013 5:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Eacles ormondei / Confidently identified / Female / Александр Думчус.

25.09.2013 1:33, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Atrophaneura alcinous.

25.09.2013 0:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Atrophaneura alcinous

25.09.2013 0:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Sea question still awaits a response.

24.09.2013 22:16, Shamil Murtazin:

and it flies? =)

24.09.2013 22:07, Alex Dumchus:

Eacles ormondei

24.09.2013 22:02, Irina Nikulina:

Thank Evgeniyu- clarified the situation. I wonder why they prefer to pupate anywhere except kirkazona?) It would seem so comfortable in the winter, you can get in the folds / convolutions huge vines, between the maze of trunks ...

24.09.2013 12:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Il! Actually the first pupae found Slobodskoy. This is his first clues have been found pupae. It was only later found Lena and others. Various locations on the trees and objects.

23.09.2013 22:51, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, wow! Here is the answer to the question of what to do with this crazy number (for this year) caterpillars altsinoya!) I remember going to look in the leaf litter) - and they won both are attached!) Love to see the entire series. Well, just "bunches" !! Valuable information you have extracted the weekend! I wish I had gone sooner, that would look at these wonders!)

23.09.2013 22:44, Irina Nikulina:

Very heap)) on a single sheet of 5-6 pieces fell in!

23.09.2013 19:28, Peter Khramov:

Good sit.

23.09.2013 19:27, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dyscia conspersaria / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

23.09.2013 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ambulyx moorei / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

23.09.2013 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ambulyx canescens / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

23.09.2013 16:23, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Caligo prometheus.

23.09.2013 16:22, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Caligo prometheus.

23.09.2013 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Scotopteryx chenopodiata / Confidently identified / Fyodor Pudovikov.

23.09.2013 11:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyclophora pendularia / 8 / Fyodor Pudovikov.

23.09.2013 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

23.09.2013 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

22.09.2013 22:37, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Scotopteryx chenopodiata

22.09.2013 22:35, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Cyclophora pendularia

22.09.2013 20:19, Alex Dumchus:

Ambulyx canescens, Walker, [1865]

22.09.2013 20:14, Alex Dumchus:

Marumba sperchius, (Ménétriés, 1857)?

22.09.2013 20:11, Alex Dumchus:

Marumba juvencus, Rothschild & Jordan, 1912?

22.09.2013 19:49, Alex Dumchus:

AMBULYX MOOREI, Moore, [1858]

22.09.2013 19:43, Alex Dumchus:

ACOSMERYX SHERVILLII, Boisduval, [1875]?

22.09.2013 13:49, Alex Dumchus:

Caligo prometheus

22.09.2013 12:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Dolly on the trunk of Sorbus sp.

22.09.2013 12:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Caterpillar on the trunk of Sorbus sp.

22.09.2013 12:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Remains of skin after molting larvae and pupae taken a liking to a piece of iron.

22.09.2013 12:35, Yuri Semejkin:

The pupae are attached to the trunk and branches at various heights from the ground. Here they are at a height of 10-15 m

22.09.2013 12:29, Yuri Semejkin:

As seen in this and other. Images for the larvae and pupae are not necessarily the presence of leaves Aristolochia manshuriensis and A. contorta. They are quite happy and improvised plants and objects are near these plants.
With regard kirkazona then strangely enough, I never saw the pupae attached to these plants as they say in the literature.

21.09.2013 12:09, Peter Khramov:

We must! Everything should be, but we'll see.

21.09.2013 7:58, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Ha! once went to this situation, then I posted a photo of another individual: # 23618
This photo butterfly before take-off, it is a work of art, and I like it. After warming up to take off the wings of a butterfly decided not to shoot the angle was "not very much" at your own risk with one hand I pulled the thread ...Butterfly did not move, and gave himself to shoot no worse than in this thread. Perspective is the same as the current image, so do not place. Although there are photos from the abdomen and legs, and even close-up. If it's necessary....

21.09.2013 5:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it's me "on the machine" simply responded to the comments of the author :)
In "from England" version and I do not look much.
And I guess, but .....

20.09.2013 21:26, Peter Khramov:

It does not just lucky, and Svetlana able to move quietly through the woods like a shadow. All would only belittle the achievements of the photographer!

20.09.2013 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, your comments on the English version is not visible, because you can not show off and write in Russian for the Russian version of the site. And there bu translation, if you're lucky -)

20.09.2013 17:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

AlternativelyDyscia conspersaria, of blueness in your region, Svetlana, could be another kind Dyscia innocentaria.

20.09.2013 16:34, Alex Dumchus:

Ituna lamirus?

20.09.2013 14:38, Alex Dumchus:

So you just got lucky, I was trying to catch them in the Tae and Vietnam, scared Troides flies like a locomotive, but mostly they are to be seen above the treetops. And can a female quieter?

20.09.2013 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

20.09.2013 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Coscinia striata / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

20.09.2013 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Coscinia striatamale

20.09.2013 13:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Troides helena / Confidently identified / Female / Александр Думчус.

20.09.2013 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

20.09.2013 9:15, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Sorry, I meant "my photo Troides helena - the first living specimens in their natural habitat" - here on this resource.

20.09.2013 9:13, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Thank you. I am certainly pleased that my photo Troides helena - the first living specimens in their natural habitat. Incidentally, it is nepuglivaya butterfly, he gave himself to shoot from all angles, and even have a picture with me in one frame such as "I am a butterfly." Even an attempt to take her on the arm, but she was such an outrage has not suffered.

20.09.2013 8:18, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

20.09.2013 8:17, Fyodor Pudovikov:

pandorus

19.09.2013 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Duc, and geography can also ... He just kind of tie can not, if a long time has passed since the publication ...

19.09.2013 20:57, Mike Mantooth:

Thank you Vasiliy and the people of lepidoptera.pro .

19.09.2013 20:54, Mike Mantooth: This species is identified correctly.

19.09.2013 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eumorpha pandorus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

19.09.2013 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, this is not Mimas Tiliae ....
May beEumorpha pandorus

19.09.2013 17:32, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea core?

19.09.2013 17:29, Alex Dumchus:

Troides helena, female.

19.09.2013 17:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, the name of the author of the subspecies can add in your LC (I can not do it for anyone).

19.09.2013 17:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ 0000-00-00 00:00:00 Indonesia, Halmahera. / 2012-03-00 00:00:00.

19.09.2013 17:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Ludia orinoptena / Confidently identified / Female / Александр Думчус.

19.09.2013 1:33, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen Moderators, please make appearance.

18.09.2013 17:48, Alex Dumchus:

Ludia orinoptena, female

17.09.2013 20:41, Olga Averyanova:

Yes, but at that moment someone reads aloud:

I love you with palm sdunu,
So as not to damage the pollen.
Fly over the dune.
Summer is coming to an end.

Above the flowers on the meadows,
Above the wall of reeds
Having lived his deception,
Bluegrass, butterfly, shower.


David Samoilov.
World Library Poetry.
Rostov-on-Don, "Phoenix", 1999.

17.09.2013 20:41, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio ulysses telegonus, Indonesia, Halmahera, 03, 2012

13.09.2013 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fixed all, thank you.

13.09.2013 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

After LC everything works. Now I will try to fix the others: those in the LK is not visible.

13.09.2013 13:16, Peter Khramov:

Basil, try now, everything should be OK.

12.09.2013 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Foty all Malaysian butterflies that I shipped recently. And yet there is something you just have Fota, upload and define, but is in no hurry. A label at all one and there where it says Malaysia is necessary to change the fact, that I sent today by e-mail :)

12.09.2013 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Send me mail text that you want to make and the number of foty to which it relates. Check ...

12.09.2013 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Who came only ....
And in a way LK: everything remains as before.

12.09.2013 16:12, Peter Khramov:

Lately the search autosuggestion on Lepidoptera.pro didn't work well as to search by taxa and the photo upload. Now everything works fine.

12.09.2013 16:11, Peter Khramov:

Recently there might have been some issues with uploading and editing pics. Now those are fixed and you are welcome to add photos without any premoderation as it was before. Uploaded photos will be immediately shown in the website gallery whilst the website moderators will do postmoderation and delete doubles and extras. Also you are free to edit more data of your pics including those uploaded earlier for what you may use a special section of the website. Big apologies for those bugs the website endured for an extended period of time.

12.09.2013 11:51, Peter Khramov:

Vassily, something ought to change through LC: -)

12.09.2013 5:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tried as an example of this butterfly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23317
This is a photo which has decided to try to not load the remaining empty comment.
Eiketka you want to download in the first to comment.
So far, to no avail.

11.09.2013 22:58, Peter Khramov:

Finally got around to illustrate the birth and other higher taxa, which had previously had no duty ph. Illustrations yet received 180 supraspecific taxa.

11.09.2013 22:21, Peter Khramov:

When loading or editing of images you specified coordinates of the image using apostrophes foty could be loaded / edited the blasted. Now the problem is solved.

11.09.2013 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Did.

11.09.2013 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pseudobunaea illustris / Confidently identified / Евгений Комаров.

10.09.2013 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow, add and drag.

10.09.2013 16:15, Peter Khramov:

It seems that one must add the form ...

10.09.2013 16:14, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lobobunaea phaedusa / Confidently identified / Евгений Комаров.

10.09.2013 16:13, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Bunaea alcinoe / Confidently identified / Evgeny Komarov.

10.09.2013 7:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Pseudobunaea illustris Weymer, 1901

10.09.2013 7:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Lobobunea phaedusa (Drury 1873)

10.09.2013 7:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Almost no options Bunaea alcinoe (Stoll, 1780)

09.09.2013 17:11, Peter Khramov:

Yes, now I corrected. Basil, in the case of such large-scale problems do not hesitate, throw an SMS or call to pofiksit could speedily. Thank signaled.

09.09.2013 6:58, Yuri Semejkin:

I Tried. Happened.

08.09.2013 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gluck serious. Somehow, this butterfly has registered in the classification of many previews.
Peter urgently needed fixes this business.
Two examples: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/27586 http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/28059

08.09.2013 19:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

08.09.2013 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov Alexandr Zhakov.

08.09.2013 18:19, Alex Dumchus:

Valiliy.Ya is not home, come after a week, I shall add

08.09.2013 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The subspecies Papilio ulysses telegonus [C. & R. Felder, 1860] Indonesian. A label is not?

08.09.2013 15:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to try to add the name of the subspecies in a private office. The "Specification of the classification (subspecies, shape, age). For example, the light shape or third instar larvae," seen when downloading photos. A lx it is at the top, called type. I can not do this for anyone.

08.09.2013 14:23, Yuri Semejkin:

It differs in appearance from the others, for example: # 9065: Papilio machaon. Let us nevertheless to distinguish between subspecies. In this case, Papilio machaon ussuriensis Sheljuzko, 1910

08.09.2013 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Tentatively identified Confidently identified.

08.09.2013 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Primorye because things: the mysterious region (it can be easily and Asian species).

08.09.2013 11:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Inaccurate?

08.09.2013 11:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Butterfly ran through the fabric cover.
On molbiole photo diagnosed aforesaid type

08.09.2013 11:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Butterfly ran through the fabric cover.
On molbiole photo diagnosed type thereof.

08.09.2013 11:24, Shamil Murtazin:

inaccurate for some reason ...

08.09.2013 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate E. clororhoa so as a form of E. chrysochlora can not find. Tell me where can I get it:'ll look and bear.

08.09.2013 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica chlororhoa / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2013 8:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica chlororhoa / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2013 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

People, ay! It is necessary to determine the version of his / voice transfer. It seems that one site I have.

08.09.2013 8:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

08.09.2013 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

08.09.2013 8:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adelpha thesprotia / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2013 8:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adelpha olynthia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2013 8:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adelpha thessalia / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

08.09.2013 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to hold such zazhirennye copies a week in gasoline "Galosha" (helps the fat: it washes out) on some revelers checked and borers.

08.09.2013 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Opinions are? Do not carry risks without discussion.

08.09.2013 7:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

ICitheronia collaris: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Citheronia%20collaris.htm
True born there in her other: Citheronoides Hübner, 1819

07.09.2013 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By Regina I have suffered it: on the underside of my opinion on it is more like.

07.09.2013 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Panacea regina / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

07.09.2013 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Panacea regina / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

07.09.2013 21:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Like it. They are in fact a little bit, and it is difficult to make a mistake: stand.

05.09.2013 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, I have probably made a mistake in her similar form: http://rarefree.fr/arctiidae/4223.htm (second from top). Nowhere do not have to endure.

05.09.2013 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is better to remove the uncertainty; I can not understand in any way: the Lee S. striata this form, then, if at all Eilema sp. But not cribraria, I laid out today.

05.09.2013 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not Coscinia cribraria today will look.

05.09.2013 16:30, Alex Dumchus:

And who determined that it inachus? It is much more similar to limborgii.

05.09.2013 10:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio isidorus??? A bunch of his subspecies.

05.09.2013 9:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Leptosia nina / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2013 9:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Leptosia nina / Confidently identified / Male / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.09.2013 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leptosia nina

05.09.2013 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leptosia nina

04.09.2013 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, just remind. Fixed a bug that labels such plan: "Malaysia, Pahang, Fraser's Hill, Silverpark, 3.42'54.81" N 101.44'07.65 "E Alt. = 1285m. Leg. Vishnyakov AN
22.03.2013-01.04.2013 "(I do not want to ship it in transliteration into Russian). The right thing in my mind: and their will correct and useful for the future.

04.09.2013 19:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Basil, rest more often =)

04.09.2013 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whew ... it is difficult given transfer system. We should relax a bit :)

04.09.2013 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Female.

04.09.2013 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Confidently identified Tentatively identified.

04.09.2013 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

/ Phoebis philea / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It can be inaccurate in supply. Checkered it: http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?search=Phoebis+philea

04.09.2013 17:35, Alex Dumchus:

Phoebis philea?

04.09.2013 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is difficult to say, like saying that they genital. We are waiting for Dmitry.

04.09.2013 17:25, Alex Dumchus:

Eurema hecabe ??

04.09.2013 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio nephelus / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Papilio nephelus / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK

04.09.2013 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Albeit in uncertain Powys. Sophisticated neptisy these.

04.09.2013 16:58, Alex Dumchus:

No, sataspes - Indonesian topic. It P. nephelus. He tae usual. Many of nephelusov are on the front wings with white stripes, and a dash of white underside as it has y I have the same. If you need to give the photo. And here on your site the same. 100% - P.nephelus chaonilus. Put in some.

04.09.2013 16:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Elymnias hypermnestra / Confidently identified / Male / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 16:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Elymnias hypermnestra / Confidently identified / Male / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Imago Male.

04.09.2013 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Cethosia hypsea / Tentatively identified / Male / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cethosia hypsea / Tentatively identified / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Put in is inaccurate Cethosia hypsea

04.09.2013 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well no. Alexander, as far as I know the flash does not remove these things.

04.09.2013 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not necessarily, and someone like P. sataspes. There are many of these in my opinion. Albeit in uncertain Powys.

04.09.2013 16:16, Alex Dumchus:

By the way, I have a half a dozen similar neopredelennnyh from Malaysia and Indonesia. One of these days I will give a photo, who can tell?

04.09.2013 16:13, Alex Dumchus:

Neptis hylas?

04.09.2013 16:09, Alex Dumchus:

There is, nevertheless, probably, Cethosia hypsea, it is brighter. Although Tae I did not catch, and C.cyane seen and caught a lot.

04.09.2013 16:01, Alex Dumchus:

Cethosia cyane, male. However, the bright, probably taken with the flash?

04.09.2013 15:59, Alex Dumchus:

Elymnias hypermnestra, male

04.09.2013 15:58, Alex Dumchus:

P.helenus ??

04.09.2013 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Drupadia ravindra / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.09.2013 13:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Drupadia ravindra / Confidently identified / Female / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.09.2013 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Some of its subspecies most likely put in fine.

04.09.2013 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loxura atymnus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.09.2013 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Loxura atymnus / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.09.2013 13:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eurema sp. Then I'll pass ....

04.09.2013 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, they do. Here's my paphia : http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/biodiversity/uk-biodiversity/cockayne/database/image.dsml?filename=500027X&taxon=Argynnis+paphia&taxonID=8551

04.09.2013 12:55, Alex Dumchus:

Why that's interesting. I didn't know that aberrations had names.

04.09.2013 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, you can create a profile with the name of the type: "Artificially obtained by experiment Butterfly" and had to drag those uniting the photos into groups. For example: "Heliconius", "Vanessa", etc., etc.
As for entering to be the "natural" and aberrants ginandromorfov not agree so they often have a scientific name.An example of this conditionality me this summer in nature unusual Argynnis paphia: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22814 (is the official name).

04.09.2013 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Vanessa myrinna / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In my opinion, too: I stand.

04.09.2013 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Anartia jatrophae / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2013 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter noticed a bad moment right now, if not exactly put daw / inaccurate picture remains under indefinite. Can remove these crows do? It does not matter if it is determined not true - people are corrected over time.

04.09.2013 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Dumchus.

04.09.2013 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 8:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lord, Now at least there is a possibility of indefinite postponement in certain types (some along the way and are determined). So please, if you have noticed any glitch or a blooper report it on a page with a photo where it was seen. We will fix it.

04.09.2013 8:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Female / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 8:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Female / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypolimnas bolina / Confidently identified / Male / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 8:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Hypolimnas bolina / 8 / Male / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 8:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis themire / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 8:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Cyrestis themire / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

04.09.2013 8:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2013 5:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima argus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.09.2013 5:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ypthima argus / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.09.2013 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is not likely: http://www.neutron.phys.ethz.ch/Lepidoptera/Nymphalidae-Satirini-Old.htm

03.09.2013 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Junonia orithya / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

03.09.2013 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Ortilia orthia Junonia orithya.

03.09.2013 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ortilia orthia / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

03.09.2013 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Dumchus.

03.09.2013 23:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Hebomoia glaucippe / Confidently identified / Alexandr Dumchus.

03.09.2013 23:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Male / Александр Думчус.

03.09.2013 23:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

03.09.2013 23:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Female / Александр Думчус.

03.09.2013 23:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

03.09.2013 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Male / Александр Думчус.

03.09.2013 22:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Papilio memnon / Confidently identified / Female / Александр Думчус.

03.09.2013 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C looks so nobody else comes to mind.

03.09.2013 22:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta leporina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.09.2013 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta leporina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.09.2013 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Acronicta leporina / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.09.2013 18:19, Alex Dumchus:

Anartia jatrophae ???

03.09.2013 18:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shorter: one group Belyanko remove photos and other photos of the sailboat.

03.09.2013 18:17, Alex Dumchus:

Similar to Vanessa myrinna (E. Doubleday, 1849)

03.09.2013 18:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter.
From: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23346 need to delete the photo 23348
Hence: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23348 need to delete the photo # 23345 and # 23346 photo
I can not understand: either I nakosyachil when knitting group or a glitch. I do not do it.

03.09.2013 15:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plodia interpunctella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.09.2013 15:54, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Plodia interpunctella / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

03.09.2013 14:17, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

03.09.2013 14:17, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

03.09.2013 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in yet accurate, and then time will tell.

03.09.2013 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Parides erithalion / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.09.2013 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mimoides xeniades / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

03.09.2013 8:14, Alex Dumchus:

This kind of Hypocrita

03.09.2013 8:13, Alex Dumchus:

Similar to Chetone phyleis

03.09.2013 2:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not got against me. Just young people should be taught to respect the mandatory rule entomologist (and just a naturalist, too): "label - a passport of an insect." Without good data, even a photo card as well as straightened material without labels simply useless souvenir.

03.09.2013 1:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah ... And while I still vyhodish exotic uncertain Podkin :)

03.09.2013 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Fast forward to undefined. Sorry for the delay.

03.09.2013 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Demitra, come out of the gloom! Surely you know that in the view of.

03.09.2013 0:25, Peter Khramov:

And what about this beast still did not know?

03.09.2013 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Basil, what do you got against children?) Well, Volgograd neighborhood tea. And so today I will write to the author of the post, to put down the data, where they are known.

03.09.2013 0:21, Peter Khramov:

Mace really dark. I went to lineoly.

03.09.2013 0:21, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Thymelicus lineola / Confidently identified / Female / Eugene Karolinskiy.

03.09.2013 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Move ...

02.09.2013 22:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Plodia interpunctella?

02.09.2013 22:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Plodia interpunctella?

02.09.2013 20:17, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. Look at Coelites epiminthia

02.09.2013 19:29, Alex Dumchus:

Maybe, yes. Confused increasing the number of red dots on the hind wings, on top of the one on the underside of 2-3 than my definition. But perhaps this is not essential.

02.09.2013 17:12, Alex Dumchus:

Guys, they need not be defined. This Costa Ricans razvekayutsya crossing as Indonesians crossed his ornithopter: since those times (O.akakeae) -Can give them names, really belongs to the genus? or partition and call -Ublyudki! to bring the aberration and ginandomorfov

02.09.2013 16:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow bear, now I work. I am sure in it. Just waiting for confirmation.

02.09.2013 15:13, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and what is not immediately transferred? Confirmations from Alexander waiting for? I mean - I do not carry identity is? ..

02.09.2013 14:59, Peter Khramov:

A. We mean tags by which are put graphical smilies. No, there are not plowed for religious reasons.

02.09.2013 7:16, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter, the phrase "Tags have always" been inside the tag "sarcasm" in html. But the engine apparently cut them. =)

02.09.2013 6:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could be so. Anyway undetectable unless of. No names of these hybrids (do not know).

02.09.2013 5:47, Peter Khramov:

Maybe as Heliconis spp. simply?

02.09.2013 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, can separate section on this do?
How to define them have no idea.

01.09.2013 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, and that such tags in this case? ..

01.09.2013 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that's okay: the main thing that will not bite :-)
I've already unsubscribed as defined: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23329

01.09.2013 22:34, Shamil Murtazin:

Sorry, mouse mad ...

01.09.2013 22:34, Shamil Murtazin: This species is identified correctly.

01.09.2013 22:34, Shamil Murtazin:

tags have always

01.09.2013 21:13, Lev Bely:

And we have the tags?

01.09.2013 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea yamamai / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

01.09.2013 20:08, Shamil Murtazin:

Leo, please put smiles or tags. And it does not understand - this is sarcasm? =)

01.09.2013 20:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With meaning. Proves that in this group of female butterflies.

01.09.2013 19:33, Lev Bely:

Wonderful shot.

01.09.2013 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Argynnis paphia / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.09.2013 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis paphiastand unequivocally.

01.09.2013 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Adhemarius fulvescens / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

01.09.2013 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Parides erithalion

01.09.2013 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mimoides xeniades?

01.09.2013 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spaelotis ravida / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.09.2013 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put in inaccurate.

01.09.2013 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Archips rosana / Confidently identified / Female / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.09.2013 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Gypsonoma minutana / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.09.2013 10:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Gypsonoma minutanacertain inaccuracies :(

01.09.2013 10:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Archips rosana

01.09.2013 10:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spaelotis ravidaI think so much shredded.

01.09.2013 8:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not understand: to whom it to drag something?

01.09.2013 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date, geography ???

01.09.2013 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date, geography ???

01.09.2013 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date, geography ???

01.09.2013 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date, geography ???

01.09.2013 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lithostege griseata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.09.2013 8:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Conistra vaccinii / Tentatively identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.09.2013 8:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Camptogramma bilineata / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.09.2013 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It may raise the issue of the inadmissibility decision in the photo gallery without geography and date of shooting?

01.09.2013 8:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Agrotis exclamationis / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

01.09.2013 7:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So it is necessary to communicate with Peter.

01.09.2013 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochropleura plecta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.09.2013 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochropleura plecta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.09.2013 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochropleura plecta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.09.2013 7:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Ochropleura plecta / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

01.09.2013 7:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ochropleura plectaprone are not required: stand.

01.09.2013 5:57, Yuri Semejkin:

If LC is a personal account, you can not. Writes Selected pictures already belong to different groups. If it is a mistake - you write a message to the administrator to mail or a comment to the picture at the bottom of the page

01.09.2013 3:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not have such an opportunity. This apparently can only make the administrator. From LC is not obtained?

01.09.2013 2:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Is it possible to connect the group to the group # 22937: Antheraea yamamai. Especially that one, and will be clearer

31.08.2013 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put authorship definitions for these three pictures based on the comments of the author photo.

31.08.2013 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Earophila badiata / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

31.08.2013 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Marija Jaunkunga.

31.08.2013 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Dmitriy Pozhogin Marija Jaunkunga.

31.08.2013 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Earophila badiata / Confidently identified / .

31.08.2013 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Earophila badiata.

31.08.2013 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

31.08.2013 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Spilosoma lubricipeda / Confidently identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

31.08.2013 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spilosoma lubricipedastand unequivocally.

31.08.2013 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lacanobia w-latinum / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.08.2013 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Hypomecis roboraria.

31.08.2013 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Confidently identified / Marija Jaunkunga.

31.08.2013 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified > Antheraea yamamai / Confidently identified / Yury Semeykin.

31.08.2013 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea yamamai / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.08.2013 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Dirphia horcana / Confidently identified / Александр Думчус.

31.08.2013 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So one of them?

31.08.2013 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Antheraea yamamai / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.08.2013 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Bembecia ichneumoniformis / Confidently identified / Igor Sakhno.

31.08.2013 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To confirm / refute now the must-have?

31.08.2013 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Euchloe ausonia

31.08.2013 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Pararge aegeria / Confidently identified / Роман Ишин.

31.08.2013 19:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mamestra brassicae / Confidently identified / Sergei Kotov.

31.08.2013 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Mamestra brassicae / 8 / Sergei Kotov.

31.08.2013 19:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Atrophaneura alcinous / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

31.08.2013 19:04, Alex Dumchus:

By nimfalam himself not good. The uncertainty of the SE. Asia had a lot of. But the great suspicion that it is more or Amatursidam or satyrs

31.08.2013 18:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In fact, on this my meyeri like. Let Powys is.
I laid the second today. And Nymphalidae one. Must-have their look.

31.08.2013 18:31, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. You laid out for comparison G.meyeri, and along with G. bathycles. His ph was not on site.

31.08.2013 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All figured out. Leo and attributed.

31.08.2013 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica norica / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

31.08.2013 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica norica / 8 / Lev Bely.

31.08.2013 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Eunica norica / Confidently identified / Lev Bely.

31.08.2013 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lord, who ascribe to the definition of something?

31.08.2013 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

About Morpho granadensis unfortunately can not say anything. We have to wait other opinions.

31.08.2013 17:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The transfer went. Like kerf how it's done :) about possible glitches will report as they become available.

31.08.2013 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Lamoria anella / Confidently identified / Alexandr Zhakov.

31.08.2013 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The precise label: 22.03.2013-01.04.2013. Malaysia, Pahang, Fraser's Hill, Silverpark, 3.42'54.81 "N 101.44'07.65" E Alt. = 1285m. leg. Vishnyakov A.N.

31.08.2013 16:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The precise label: 22.03.2013-01.04.2013. Malaysia, Pahang, Fraser's Hill, Silverpark, 3.42'54.81 "N 101.44'07.65" E Alt. = 1285m. leg. Vishnyakov A.N.

31.08.2013 12:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Clear. Thank you all for the Old!

31.08.2013 12:14, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you, Basil. What about Morpho granadensis? - View or not view ??

31.08.2013 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

31.08.2013 12:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Brahmaea wallichi / Brahmaea certhia / Александр Думчус.

31.08.2013 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, he worked day and just somehow missed the discussion on Bram. Who he added certhia separate species.

31.08.2013 11:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well Now Googling and vobyu views.
UPD: View added to Biolib cz., Later transferred.

31.08.2013 11:47, Alex Dumchus:

The benefits of the discussion: as it was, I dug G.bathyacles, which took over doson. Later, I will lay out photos. Basil, by the way, about Brahmaea certia? (Question # 23263 photo) You have not answered ...

31.08.2013 11:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah. I have one more out there-same, but smaller and with a slightly different pattern (later lay). Deal-be with them.

31.08.2013 11:14, Alex Dumchus:

Neither one nor the other. This group of about 6 cm. My meyeri about 8 cm. Your either overgrown dosonovskoy group, whether nedorostok Meyeri? It is necessary to clarify by Meyer may already have in Malaysia? Fly in the Peruvian Tae Dryas s, he caught himself. If necessary, I give a picture of his Meyer, but just I have no labels.

31.08.2013 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In the span of about 7 cm.

31.08.2013 10:51, Alex Dumchus:

And the size of its standard for this group (evemon, doson, eurypylus) or slightly more?

31.08.2013 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually osmetery (lat. Osmeterium) is forked sac iron present in larvae of many sailboats. This exuding a sharp and unpleasant smell iron caterpillar pushes for self-defense when he feels the danger.

31.08.2013 9:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then inaccurate G. doson and bear.
Collected material is my good friend and accuracy of the labels so there is no doubt for me personally.

31.08.2013 9:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All bear. Later :)
By the author photo:
I'd like to see the date and geographical data for the photo shoot.
This is necessary in most cases when people have to define undefined types.

31.08.2013 9:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nedoperenesli :)

31.08.2013 8:42, Alex Dumchus:

If you are interested my opinion, it is very similar to G. meyeri, but to my knowledge the last - endemic to Indonesia? and somewhat larger in size than doson. Then some subspecies G. doson.

31.08.2013 7:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Underdetermined?

31.08.2013 6:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary for technical purposes, to someone other than me to determine the type (underside is attached).
The precise label: 22.03.2013-01.04.2013. Malaysia, Pahang, Fraser's Hill, Silverpark, 3.42'54.81 "N 101.44'07.65" E Alt. = 1285m. leg. Vishnyakov A.N.
22.03.2013-01.04.2013.

30.08.2013 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, everything in general is clear. The first experience of the transfer took place.

30.08.2013 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Vasiliy Feoktistov.

30.08.2013 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: Corrected data.

Not identified Abraxas sylvata / Confidently identified / .

30.08.2013 18:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Orange "mustache" caterpillar. Push if "scare."
Any such swallowtail caterpillars - # 22414.

30.08.2013 18:51, Yuri Semejkin:

This caterpillar altsinoya.
I do not know what osmetry

30.08.2013 18:25, Shamil Murtazin:

It osmetry? ..
What are plush :)

30.08.2013 18:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Zoom in them ... It looks like they have an interesting texture.

30.08.2013 15:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Definitely not Cupido argiades

30.08.2013 14:57, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Cupido argiades / Igor Sakhno Cupido decolorata / Eugene Karolinskiy.

30.08.2013 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Yes, in such cases often popmogaet write a version without end.

30.08.2013 13:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Atrophaneura alcinous

30.08.2013 1:16, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified / Imago Automeris postalbida / Confidently identified / Male / Александр Думчус.

30.08.2013 1:12, Peter Khramov:

Make a right to Basil, and along with standardized transfer form. Now it will look something like this: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/23294 (my comments on 08/30/2013 1:08). If anyone noticed any glitches in connection with the innovations, please report to the subject or to the post office. Well, on the page or glitches.In addition, in order to avoid misunderstandings, users can now change their binding to the types of photons only for an hour after the download (earlier it was possible to change later - if the species was unknown). Because it turned out so that becoming an author photo, when in fact it was not.Now, these translations will be engaged in only moderators and admin.

30.08.2013 1:08, Peter Khramov: Corrected data.

Not identified Caradrina clavipalpis / Confidently identified / Shamil Murtazin.

29.08.2013 22:09, Irina Nikulina:

Caradrina clavipalpis?

29.08.2013 19:57, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

29.08.2013 19:57, Sergei Kotov:

Mamestra brassicae (Linnaeus, 1758)

29.08.2013 18:07, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris postalbida, male

29.08.2013 10:59, Shamil Murtazin:

and it has a crest? .. Very similar to # 23197
Caradrina clavipalpis

29.08.2013 8:50, Alex Dumchus:

Googling else. They are different. At the very wallichii three subspecies, by the way, similar to each other. Serthia from those whom I looked, believe autonomous views. And it's not like they do! Bodrov's words - "What's the truth, brother?" And Basil? Perhaps it is necessary to clarify the classification? And Morpho granadensis a well-deserved place - in species? IMHO amateur.

28.08.2013 17:57, Shamil Murtazin:

The search engine is not looking.
So looking for
Cupido decolorata

28.08.2013 16:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

decoloratus

28.08.2013 12:52, Alex Dumchus:

Interestingly, other sites image B.wallichii quite similar to certia, have waallchii on the front wings there are large eyes with black and sometimes white dots inside. It is more like a B.hearseyi. http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/BrBramophthalmawalwal.htm http://www.wildsilkmoth-paukstadt.de/pic2/br_wal.html and others.

28.08.2013 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On funete Brahmaea certhia generally a misnomer: http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/bombycoidea/brahmaeidae/brahmaea/index.html#wallichi
And so: on this site and drove.

28.08.2013 9:46, Alex Dumchus:

And I thought that the classification is the same as Biolib. Basil, can link to the source?

27.08.2013 22:59, Igor Sakhno:

I agree!

27.08.2013 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The specific name Brahmaea certhia according to the classification adopted by the site is synonymous Brahmaea wallichi.

27.08.2013 16:14, Alex Dumchus:

Male, Morpho catenarius, ispod

27.08.2013 16:06, Alex Dumchus:

Peter, I give all foty underside white morph

27.08.2013 15:40, Alex Dumchus:

Brahmaea certhia Fabricius, 1793

27.08.2013 12:08, Yuri Semejkin:

That's ok. They all get worn-out likewise after mating.

27.08.2013 11:05, Alex Dumchus:

It is, Eunica norica

26.08.2013 20:39, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Beauty !!!

26.08.2013 19:25, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, remove excess.

26.08.2013 13:20, Evgeny Komarov:

No, not a bug! It is my own blunder!

26.08.2013 13:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! On this page: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6788 doubles: Photo # 23104 and # 23214 Photography. Either I somehow contrived or glitch!

26.08.2013 8:04, Shamil Murtazin:

Notably fly it ...

26.08.2013 0:56, Peter Khramov:

Foty endured types illustrated in a couple of days back I will do a control interface for the transfer of photons to the species for Basil (old got burned with the computer).

26.08.2013 0:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Antheraea yamamai

25.08.2013 23:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Antheraea yamamai

25.08.2013 23:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Antheraea yamamai

25.08.2013 22:49, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:48, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:48, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:47, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:46, Peter Khramov:

Summary?

25.08.2013 22:46, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:43, Peter Khramov:

Summary?

25.08.2013 22:43, Peter Khramov:

Pritindent!

25.08.2013 22:42, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

25.08.2013 22:42, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

25.08.2013 22:42, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

25.08.2013 22:41, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:41, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:40, Peter Khramov:

Anyway krosotk.

25.08.2013 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Please add the form to the modders.

25.08.2013 22:38, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:38, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:38, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:37, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:37, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.08.2013 22:36, Peter Khramov:

Always. We are not only on the ph we dance, but also from the samples. For example, to search for females foty it could ...

25.08.2013 22:34, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with another photo from the same individual.

25.08.2013 22:34, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:30, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:30, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:29, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:28, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Of course not.

25.08.2013 22:24, Peter Khramov:

Wallpapers without flowers - not wallpaper!

25.08.2013 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Vlad, where a caterpillar?

25.08.2013 22:21, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:21, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:21, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:21, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:17, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:17, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:16, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:16, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:16, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:15, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:12, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:12, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:12, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 22:12, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:50, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:43, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:26, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:25, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:25, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:25, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:25, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:25, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:22, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:22, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:21, Peter Khramov:

Put in is inaccurate.

25.08.2013 21:20, Peter Khramov:

Put.

25.08.2013 21:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved by analogy with http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/11934.

25.08.2013 21:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.08.2013 21:13, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:12, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Battus philenor.

25.08.2013 21:09, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 21:09, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.08.2013 15:20, Peter Khramov:

Lord, I apologize for the long disconnection. It happened technical Achtung wild during the journey, only now more or less managed to start restoring data. In a couple of days, everything will be Coca-Cola.

25.08.2013 9:57, Su Ketkar:

Seema to be Abrax sp.

25.08.2013 6:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Who can say that in the caterpillar, and then took one and she does not want to sort of have to take what is, ie Ipomoea purpurea. These were about ten caterpillars and leaf and for the top and on the stem.

24.08.2013 21:47, Boris Novikov: This species is identified correctly.

24.08.2013 21:47, Boris Novikov:

It still Battus philenor

24.08.2013 11:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Aporia Crataegi?

23.08.2013 3:24, Igor Sakhno:

I do not know. I used to like, these are not met.

22.08.2013 11:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Abraxas sylvata

19.08.2013 21:34, Andrey Ponomarev:

Aristotelia ericinella, definition Oliver Rist.

19.08.2013 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, a certain amount of exotics formed. It is not in no hurry to make a copy and spread seeing the situation .......

19.08.2013 15:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, here I am looking :( distribute a bunch of photos to species not previously had pictures on the site, or had only collectible, but in the pages of species they have not withdrawn (ie photo is attached, and the page type "naked" .

19.08.2013 10:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Still unclear. This is not typical for the punctual admin - disappear for a long time and without warning. Especially conceived without passing a function to transfer files to you, Vasily. I understand you have a major confidant, not for nothing that he is a guinea you chose. As a result of that? And everything came to a halt

18.08.2013 23:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Today just saw 5 pieces in one place ... photographed ... =)

18.08.2013 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I will take the courage to answer for Peter since met in Moscow with him in person two days ago (he took the box and even some of the equipment: it is necessary to spread and put out material from Malaysia, and had nowhere). It is necessary to wait a bit: Peter is now very busy shop and literally torn.Over time, I'm sure everything will work fine: you just have to wait.

18.08.2013 7:02, Yuri Semejkin:

And the people have like two days does not throw shots. Peter! Where are you ?

17.08.2013 16:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Apparently, something happened ...

16.08.2013 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hyles euphorbiae

16.08.2013 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Macrothylacia rubi

16.08.2013 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.08.2013 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only now heHyles gallii

16.08.2013 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.08.2013 21:49, Nastya Krujkova:

Celerio gallii

16.08.2013 20:59, Nastya Krujkova:

Acronicta psi?

16.08.2013 20:34, Nastya Krujkova:

Dear Svetlana, in the image captured male Triodia sylvina, ie hepialidae forest. Beautiful mirror effect =).

15.08.2013 18:08, Alex Dumchus:

I have in my collection is the same, only more smooth blur. It is not attrition and birth trauma (when immature wings stick), probably a new subspecies ???

15.08.2013 16:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Epinotia nisella?

15.08.2013 16:42, Shamil Murtazin:

Epinotia nisella?

15.08.2013 16:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Epinotia nisella?

15.08.2013 13:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Please correct my mistake. Determination Eulithis ledereri made Kirpichnikova VA, but it has been ognёvkami. Subsequently, the determination is made Belyaev EA and identified the species as Eulithis convergenata Bremer, 1864, which corresponds to reality.

15.08.2013 13:25, Shamil Murtazin:

Definition - Sergei Kotov

15.08.2013 13:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Definition - Sergei Kotov

15.08.2013 13:24, Shamil Murtazin:

Definition - Sergei Kotov

15.08.2013 13:23, Shamil Murtazin:

I think everyone agrees that the first definition - Igor Sakhno

15.08.2013 13:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Definition - Sergei Kotov

15.08.2013 13:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Definition - Sergei Kotov

15.08.2013 13:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Definition - Sergei Kotov

15.08.2013 13:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Definition - Sergei Kotov

15.08.2013 12:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And he has a subspecies? Something of information I can not find. I think just the variability / aberration?

15.08.2013 12:27, Igor Sakhno:

I can some subspecies?

14.08.2013 20:52, Nastya Krujkova:

The picture is gorgeous. Maybe it Xestia sexstrigata.

14.08.2013 20:41, Nastya Krujkova:

Yuri Semeykin, I completely agree with Leo White. The underside is very similar, but a curious lack of top center. spots.

14.08.2013 20:40, Nastya Krujkova:

Yuri Semeykin, I completely agree with Leo White. The underside is very similar, but a curious lack of top center. spots.

14.08.2013 20:17, Nastya Krujkova:

I agree with Sergei Kotov, only blue stain - Acontia trabealis

14.08.2013 20:08, Nastya Krujkova:

In my opinion, this butterfly is not a scoop, and Moth. Look for the following in the family Geometridae → subfamily Ennominae → Tribo Boarmiini this site. More precisely is not presume to say.

14.08.2013 17:03, Sergei Kotov:

Caradrina clavipalpis (Scopoli, 1763)

14.08.2013 17:03, Sergei Kotov:

Caradrina clavipalpis (Scopoli, 1763)

14.08.2013 17:03, Sergei Kotov:

Caradrina clavipalpis (Scopoli, 1763)

14.08.2013 17:02, Sergei Kotov:

Caradrina clavipalpis (Scopoli, 1763)

14.08.2013 16:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:56, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus icarus

14.08.2013 16:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:55, Sergei Kotov:

Fabriciana adippe ([Schiffermuller], 1775)

14.08.2013 16:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:54, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:54, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:47, Sergei Kotov:

Emmelia trabealis

14.08.2013 16:47, Sergei Kotov:

Emmelia trabealis

14.08.2013 16:35, Sergei Kotov:

Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus, 1758)

14.08.2013 16:35, Sergei Kotov:

Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus, 1758)

14.08.2013 16:35, Sergei Kotov:

Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus, 1758)

14.08.2013 16:26, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 16:26, Sergei Kotov:

Parastichtis suspecta (Hubner, 1807)

14.08.2013 16:26, Sergei Kotov:

Parastichtis suspecta (Hubner, 1807)

14.08.2013 16:26, Sergei Kotov:

Parastichtis suspecta (Hubner, 1807)

14.08.2013 15:50, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:47, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:34, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:34, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:34, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:30, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:24, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:24, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:24, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:24, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:23, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2013 15:23, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

13.08.2013 22:14, Shamil Murtazin:

We can say, almost not damaged :)

13.08.2013 16:13, Nastya Krujkova: This species is identified correctly.

12.08.2013 22:11, Shamil Murtazin:

it is probably not the clutch ... caterpillar ... all eyes looked)))

12.08.2013 10:48, Shamil Murtazin:

oops ... well, not as lupinus.

12.08.2013 9:35, Shamil Murtazin:

I propose to add to the "Living Butterfly" / "Dried butterfly" click "on the wallpaper" ...

11.08.2013 11:04, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho catenaria, polyphemus have clearly highlighted one strip on the front underside of the wings and bigger eyes on underside. More like a subspecies M.poly.luna, but it is not particularly bred in captivity, so M.catenaria / If necessary, I can give a comparative picture of all the underside.

11.08.2013 9:27, Alex Dumchus:

The site Biolib she, too, is a separate species - Morpho granadensis, Felder

11.08.2013 9:19, Alex Dumchus:

Kallimoides rumia, male

11.08.2013 8:56, Alex Dumchus:

Junonia lemonias

11.08.2013 8:53, Alex Dumchus:

Cethosia cyane, female

11.08.2013 8:52, Alex Dumchus:

Sethosia cyane, male

11.08.2013 8:47, Alex Dumchus:

Thank you, Basil. I, for his dark, not guessed. Schazz go over everything.

10.08.2013 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

08.10.2013 21:07 Alexander Dumchus:
And in what particular place hangs a sign "Indeterminate" ??
The gallery and the hanging: in the "accuracy of determining" need to select the degree of accuracy and click "Print".

10.08.2013 21:07, Alex Dumchus:

And in what particular place hangs a sign "Indeterminate" ?? I somehow did not find, in addition to pop-up windows sometimes. She would hang somewhere in the classification or the Gallery. And again, I think it is right to give to the author at least, would bind to the old (well, at worst family) if the form does not know. For example: Automeris sp, and output Classification foty on race.Then, the ascent ph already way, the process will go faster determination. IMHO.

10.08.2013 20:48, Lev Bely:

Yuri, as far as I know, the shop takes a lot of time now Peter. Well, live and when it is necessary, too. A push - a little, not a roller coaster down :)

10.08.2013 19:57, Yuri Semejkin:

What Peter push it and so informed. Apparently there is some reason (perhaps technical) to suspend the process.

10.08.2013 19:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Photos posted. Tied without problems.
23140 - covers dried up after the butterfly pupae.

10.08.2013 19:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Clean Statistics -1000 uncertain and controversial ~ 700 out of nearly 17,000 pictures.
If you do not mind dear moderators of the established system - why not leave it.In my understanding when moving in the direction of increasing need moderators feature backups in case of sabotage actions (sort of version control) to back the above actions on a specific photo. Probably something like that already.

In general, the flag is "inaccurate" on a site is not very clear for me.Photos still displayed along with tochnoopredelёnnymi, there is no clear indication of the inaccuracy (postscript in dopdannyh not read very well).Maybe in the upper right corner of the photo thumbnail to put an exclamation mark on a yellow background? :)
Well, in the derivation of the photos on the right type of the panels inaccurately defined separate from the group with a clear indication of? ..
(ideas-so many, but not the fact that they are all useful and following them will be better)

10.08.2013 19:11, Lev Bely:

To what it advanced, I was just writing articles at times :) Maybe on Plantarium there is some technical foolproof, or cancellation of incorrect movements performed competently. Let's push Peter to quickly made it possible for at least a moderating, indeed, it will go.And there can be and to think about ordinary users, more precisely, a well-designed system, but think about it - is already taken for certain positions "with a salary and staffing", as used to say Comrade Novosel :) Same Wikipedia, which is written by people from around the world as In practice, a rough informational flaws,Although the system provides for verification of the content, but there is a verifiable arms reach ... So here, a lot of butterflies, the same amount will be transferred, someone needs to keep track of the correctness of movements, correct mistakes ... In general, while a carte blanche moderators: )

10.08.2013 19:10, Yuri Semejkin:

In principle, this is not necessarily the case. The moment of oviposition, speaks for itself.

10.08.2013 18:58, Shamil Murtazin:

Apparently, we can safely write that the female)
It is a pity that only lives in Primorye ...

10.08.2013 18:51, Yuri Semejkin:

I will not argue. You probably an advanced user. You know better . I just do not understand. Why Plantarium admin with this modernization are not afraid. Something was not seen abuse. Each renaming, moving fixed whom it is performed

10.08.2013 18:18, Lev Bely:

Ancyluris jurgensenii?

10.08.2013 17:56, Lev Bely:

All this is too much, of course. In good faith, you can naperenosit that years of accumulated material per day will turn into a pile of debris. I have here a site in the half put :)

10.08.2013 17:48, Lev Bely:

Heliconius ismenius?

10.08.2013 17:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, it is not clear what bad pictures of butterflies in nature. If only that sometimes absent or underside or the top one and the same individual (which is not true of the collector with material), and then you can argue. In nature, enough facilities where visual assessment is sufficient, without any further clarification.
With regard to the transfer. Yes, everything will be adjusted.I would do the right transfer provided to all participants, as is done, for example, Plantarium, blocking only the right to delete. Sighed and moderators have more room. I think you have and so leaves enough time to control the accuracy of determination

10.08.2013 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why not? Most male it is.

10.08.2013 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well then, can be accurate. All the same from a photo in nature no updates are not removed.
Suffered, he would. Only still do not have that right. Migrates only Peter: I do not know why a good idea stalled

10.08.2013 12:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Along with a file # 23172 threw to view Matov AY He believes that the definition is done right. Ie these 2 pictures really Stigmatophora flava. So, gentlemen moderators decide: Wrap-not to transfer

10.08.2013 11:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Lymantria dispar?

10.08.2013 0:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus

09.08.2013 23:57, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

Shamil, it is not the same butterfly. Filmed in various locations.

09.08.2013 23:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus

09.08.2013 23:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus

09.08.2013 23:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus

09.08.2013 23:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus

09.08.2013 23:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Endotricha flammealis

09.08.2013 23:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Endotricha flammealis

09.08.2013 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pleuroptya ruralis

09.08.2013 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pleuroptya ruralis

09.08.2013 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pleuroptya ruralis

09.08.2013 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pleuroptya ruralis

09.08.2013 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pleuroptya ruralis

09.08.2013 21:13, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris silkae (Brechlin & Meister 2011) ???

09.08.2013 20:42, Alex Dumchus:

Eacles imperialis female?

09.08.2013 20:41, Alex Dumchus:

Similar to Copaxa pararufinans (Brechlin & Meister 2010)

09.08.2013 20:39, Alex Dumchus:

Similar to Dirphia avia (Stoll 1780)

09.08.2013 20:36, Alex Dumchus:

Dirphia horcana (Schaus 1911)

09.08.2013 18:18, Lev Bely:

Vilkommen :)

09.08.2013 16:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thysanoplusia intermixta

09.08.2013 9:46, Shamil Murtazin:

More and twitter ... but I was not there: D

09.08.2013 1:24, Lev Bely:

It was in our twitter https://twitter.com/Lepidoptera_pro with such name :)

08.08.2013 23:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Alex, it's all one and the same copper-butterfly or not? ..
Here, the site has the ability to combine pictures in the group "edit the old."

08.08.2013 23:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Gonepteryx rhamni

08.08.2013 23:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Gonepteryx rhamni

08.08.2013 23:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Gonepteryx rhamni

08.08.2013 23:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Gonepteryx rhamni

08.08.2013 18:45, Shamil Murtazin:

I do not see any gestures. Experience goes or is delayed? ..

08.08.2013 15:23, Shamil Murtazin:

tridens indistinguishable from work?

08.08.2013 11:48, Peter Khramov:

Mutants are among anyone there ...

08.08.2013 10:21, Alexsandr Martukov:

Clear!)
By the way, I'm an amateur biologist said that butterflies are among the mutants ...

08.08.2013 10:14, Shamil Murtazin:

Hyponephele lycaon

08.08.2013 10:10, Shamil Murtazin:

Here is my "woman" ... But it seems to be a male)))

08.08.2013 7:53, Shamil Murtazin:

Just get-together some =)

08.08.2013 4:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Compare http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21841 (BM typical form), and this image. And see .....

07.08.2013 23:25, Alexsandr Martukov:

And what is the deviation?)

07.08.2013 16:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way: abberant interesting and every day this vstretish.

07.08.2013 16:05, Lev Bely:

That's why I was surprised that the butterfly seemed very familiar, and hangs in uncertainty. Thank you for the clarification!

07.08.2013 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It was initially identified as the author of a-album. Just misspelled was unattached to fall into the types of photos. He left the definition of Andrew.

07.08.2013 12:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well ... "Rabbit" until :-) computer starts.

07.08.2013 12:15, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, he corrected. Lord, now with the transfer will experiment on Basil, if all sides everything will be OK, right and share the other moderators, as well as wanting the service from our garden.

07.08.2013 12:14, Peter Khramov:

Thank you suffered.

07.08.2013 12:12, Peter Khramov:

Who will experiment with alternative forms of transport to the ph. Moderators will have the right to transfer with automatic software affixing of information, and where someone from that suffered. For starters will Vasiliy Feoktistov guinea, and if all goes well, the list will expand and deepen.Who is undermining not carried over a certain amount of photons, just be good to see.
If anyone notices any bugs - please unsubscribe in the subject or on the photo page.

07.08.2013 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio xuthus

07.08.2013 8:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ninguta schrenkii

07.08.2013 0:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Polygonia c-album

06.08.2013 23:34, Lev Bely:

Or comma?

06.08.2013 23:29, Lev Bely:

Polygonia c-album?

06.08.2013 23:15, Igor Sakhno:

Perhaps aurate it.

06.08.2013 23:14, Igor Sakhno:

Oh, it seems to me, I was wrong. I think it aurate.

06.08.2013 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The liquid this "industrial waste" accumulated during a butterfly pupal state.

06.08.2013 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oblёtannaya female Argynnis paphia f. valesina Esper, 1800 to be precise.

06.08.2013 20:57, Shamil Murtazin:

She is so oblёtannaya?

06.08.2013 20:55, Shamil Murtazin:

The butterfly came out just the same ... Strong tearing the veils still creating =)
Thank you all for the analysis of the situation and quick consultation!
Photos later.
P.S. Already that time interested in the question - what a bright liquid at the exit of the cocoon? .. Molting "solutions" - that's understandable.But this time, a butterfly sitting on a leaf and vigorously waving its wings, made a "puddle" orange liquid (sorry for details). In archips podana liquid bright scarlet (although this color of this butterfly is not at all).

06.08.2013 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Very conditionally (put in inaccurate):Stigmatophora flava
http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Lithosiinae/Stigmatophora_flava.htm

06.08.2013 20:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Argynnis paphia

06.08.2013 20:21, Evgeny Komarov:

And this http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/15608 move the place to albipuncta

06.08.2013 12:15, Shamil Murtazin:

Cocoon stronger condition, because it is unpretentious pupate in dry leaves.
Loaded into the container wetted vatok. Cocoon became softer. Hopefully, but less and less ... (
Basil, you agree cocoon was carefully cut from one side. Dolly was actually in it. It seems Tatiana law.Although it was raining, the humidity in the tank was different, though, and the top cover rag. Well, we continue to learn ...

06.08.2013 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And for me, it is not necessary to pull out of the chrysalis the caterpillar cocoon if it wove and kaya always pupate in a cocoon. In nature, everything is provided and should not be so drastically interfere in the process.

06.08.2013 10:09, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Check whether the mobility of the members of the pupa. Try to spray the water may be too late.

06.08.2013 9:58, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Most likely

06.08.2013 8:59, Shamil Murtazin:

Acronicta psi?

06.08.2013 8:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Apparently, still "dry up" ... It is sad.

06.08.2013 8:50, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

06.08.2013 8:49, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

06.08.2013 8:45, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Mythimna (Hyphilare) albipuncta ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775)

05.08.2013 22:37, Evgeny Komarov:

By Hadena perplexa clearly has nothing to do - if the other type of images on the page are defined true!

05.08.2013 21:39, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Duration step may vary depending on razl.faktorov: temperature, humidity .... In critical conditions can butterfly die being already formed (e.g., excessive dryness stale shell). Notice how the increases in the number of newly hatched butterflies nature after rain.

05.08.2013 21:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Look here - take photos on the page type http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6802

05.08.2013 21:14, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

05.08.2013 21:07, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Rhyparia purpurata (Linnaeus, 1758)

04.08.2013 20:51, Shamil Murtazin:

scoop, and even convolvulaceae ... is on creepers on the Scourge, too, is closely watching)

04.08.2013 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For clarity, it is necessary to photos. The color horns eitherMimas tiliae, orSmerinthus ocellata. But I repeat: No photo is "guesswork."

04.08.2013 15:51, Igor Sakhno:

So Acontia sp. Obviously relative trabealis

04.08.2013 14:11, Qshka Jah:

In the courtyard saw a huge caterpillar black, oily, long, at the end of the blue spike. flat snout, hairless body. what is it? We live in Novosibirsk. Thank you

04.08.2013 10:07, Shamil Murtazin:

One "but" - the definition of the type attributed to the author photo. However, in this case the form determined Vasiliy Feoktistov.

04.08.2013 10:05, Shamil Murtazin:

Here. Excellent views autosubstitution put down, and "precision".
The system works.
I ask Peter again to answer my question - "like better?".

04.08.2013 10:03, Shamil Murtazin:

And here is a contender for the sample changer, "accuracy" and prescribing the type.
Before this type of comment was "not defined".

04.08.2013 10:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Pelurga comitata, Vasiliy Feoktistov

04.08.2013 10:02, Shamil Murtazin:

Pelurga comitata, Vasiliy Feoktistov

04.08.2013 9:19, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. pulchra Eisner, 1889.

04.08.2013 9:19, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. pulchra Eisner, 1889.

04.08.2013 9:16, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. merzbacheri Fruhstorfer, 1906.

04.08.2013 9:16, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. merzbacheri Fruhstorfer, 1906.

04.08.2013 9:15, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. merzbacheri Fruhstorfer, 1906.

04.08.2013 9:15, Evgeny Komarov:

ssp. merzbacheri Fruhstorfer, 1906.

04.08.2013 0:24, Lev Bely:

Lycaena dispar?

04.08.2013 0:24, Lev Bely:

Lycaena dispar?

04.08.2013 0:13, Lev Bely:

Yes, any applicant for a logo :) lepidoptery.ru!

03.08.2013 22:19, Maxim Schwarz:

I think one that smile on her head?

03.08.2013 14:10, Shamil Murtazin:

If this difference is visible "from the outside" without cooking and preparation, can it (the difference) to take a picture. You just need to get hold of certain items exactly =)

03.08.2013 12:00, Igor Sakhno:

Yes, live butterflies is really needed skill!

03.08.2013 2:34, Yuri Semejkin:

As candidates, I would suggest two Eugene. Komarov and Caroline (if they certainly do not mind).

03.08.2013 2:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

PS: I put together a few years ago between a few pieces and Peresechnoy Solonitsevka. Atalia and showed Britomartis. They fly in the same habitats. Atalia ranshe little bit, but basically overlaps years. A couple Britomartis / Aurelius somehow can be distinguished by their appearance by Atal (and even then, there are contentious cases), but from each other, I would not venture.Males of all three species are defined by great genitals. This determination can be done in the field have a living butterfly (preferably loop and a little bit of experience / skill :))

03.08.2013 2:01, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Reliable - no.

03.08.2013 1:42, Lev Bely:

"I Gave birth to the queen of the night, not the son, not the daughter of ..."

03.08.2013 1:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Most of the night do not often see during the day, but byvaet.Kstati woman. I gave this butterfly in the museum, so entomologists say that it is a male.

02.08.2013 16:41, Igor Sakhno:

A copy of, unfortunately, not yet, but only sfotkatsya. So they have no external differences there?

02.08.2013 15:17, Lev Bely:

Yet the summer getaway turns out to be the real deal. Whilst I'm peacefully chilling alone in a palm tree, gazing around, sipping something... appropriate, seeing no butterflies at all, local palm TV is playing all time classics The Cranberries “Just My Imagination” that features lots of butterflies and the lovely frontwoman too. Summer!
The Cranberries, Just My Imagination (Bury the Hatchet, 1999)

02.08.2013 7:41, Shamil Murtazin:

That can not imagine. You walk through the forest itself, and sits on an oak this ... orange-yellow ...

02.08.2013 7:30, Shamil Murtazin:

It seemed to me that the form still has the ability to move through editing. And then put a checkbox or "just" or "inaccurate."
You can arrange testing. The next batch of pictures, let's try (after the rains plan).
Specifically on the candidates - that he is too little contact with all of you.And Lepidoptera differ from each other with a big-and-hard-and-m)
You are an excellent administrator;)

02.08.2013 0:44, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, there's a glitch, it's not in English. Fixed - I accomplish your goal.

01.08.2013 22:53, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with photos http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22920.

01.08.2013 22:53, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with photos http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22920.

01.08.2013 22:53, Peter Khramov:

Shamil, now you simply do not have the possibility to tie Fautua mind if more than an hour with her boot. Therefore, I will bind (the last month doing this normal braking, but this is temporary).
In the future, obviously we need another admin / modernization with such rights, that the case was moving actively.If you have any suggestions for candidates - boom discuss.
But the users themselves, I think, will not be able to carry foty kinds in any desired time, because because this could start arbitrary (not necessarily with malicious intent can, and simply out of ignorance / negligence).

01.08.2013 22:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Today the 26th ... I think with photos 22806, 07/08/13
= (

01.08.2013 21:16, Tatyana Gordeeva:

3-4 weeks (21-24 days)

01.08.2013 19:48, Shamil Murtazin:

Please tell me how much time in a cocoon is bear kaya?
According to descriptions of the caterpillar hibernates so that hibernation is not threatened.
But in a cocoon, she sat up something ... Although the flight of another month could go ...

01.08.2013 19:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Peter! Please tell me how it is more convenient to do:
1. After two or three definitions to prescribe the form and put in inaccurate.
2. After two or three definitions put into precise
3. Do nothing, wait until you do everything to get it? ..

31.07.2013 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My advice to Daniel: always put some ethyl acetate on the exicator bottom, or as our Soviet school textbooks said, “Put a few crystals of thymol or phenol on the bottom of an exicator to prevent mould growth.” =). That was a citation from the book “Vasha Kollektsiia. Sbor i izgotovlenie zoologicheskih kollektsij. Study guide.” by Ninburg E. Kozlov M. Publ. house Prosveshenie, Moscow, 1971.

31.07.2013 20:39, Lev Bely:

Once our good twitter friend, entomologist Daniel Llavaneras (https://twitter.com/dllavaneras), came back from the expedition in the Andes and placed his Lepidoptera trophies, a dozen specimens inside an exicator, or simply relaxing chamber. Time went fast and one week later Llavaneras found that the gold had turned to miserable rust — specimens got covered in mould that surprisingly varied by up to 5 different species at least. Interestingly, some mould preferred abdomen, the other found thorax much tastier. Whilst the catch is obviously spoiled, Daniel, as he said in his post, got an interest in fungus specificity in Lepidoptera, and seems to feel as sad as enthusiastic over the new discovery. Pure scientist!

Moth affected by mould in a relaxing chamber, Daniel Llavaneras, http://theygocrunch.wordpress.com
Daniel's personal advice: “Don't pin tomorrow what you can pin today. Mold will attack if you let it, so always remember to pin specimens within 24 hours of leaving them in a relaxing chamber (unless you really want the alien teddy bears).”
Read his post “The perils of being busy” in full on http://theygocrunch.wordpress.com/2013/07/04/the-perils-of-being-busy/.
Follow Daniel Llavaneras on Twitter, https://twitter.com/dllavaneras, and get tuned for field notes as well as amazing macro pics of various arthropods.
They go “Crunch”, http://theygocrunch.wordpress.com
Photo: Daniel Llavaneras, http://theygocrunch.wordpress.com

31.07.2013 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I meant for the field "Time and place of the shooting / fishing": for aglitski not obtained even without a GPS, as Russian letters to write names of theirs once hrenovatenko will :)

31.07.2013 11:31, Peter Khramov:

Points on the map are almost ready: -) So that you can look all the goods.

31.07.2013 5:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah. And probably all of the tribe thence lishaynitsy Nudariini good. While only 4 species managed to illustrate.
Geographer to more normal to drive: the label has all the Malayan (all from one place).

31.07.2013 2:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Nominative subspecies. :)

31.07.2013 2:24, Peter Khramov:

Krasotulya what.

31.07.2013 2:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I think it's still Britomartis - of those edges (Solonitsevka-Peresechnaya) it reliably known (determined from the genitals). Aurelius of the Kharkiv region was significantly not yet known (and indeed its discovery we have quite unlikely). Appearance can be deceptive here. But if this specimen collected - you can find out for sure.I can cook it. :)

30.07.2013 19:56, Alexsandr Martukov:

Exc., Clearly!)))

30.07.2013 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Ihodya from the region to think subspecies of Apatura ilia ussuriensis Kurentzov, 1937

30.07.2013 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

WellApatura iliais. Roman, thanks for the reminder. And I'm here to do and Exotics their forgot about it completely.

30.07.2013 16:59, Roman Ishin:

Scopula rubiginata

30.07.2013 16:58, Roman Ishin:

Cosmia trapezina

30.07.2013 16:57, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

30.07.2013 16:54, Roman Ishin:

Rather A. ilia red shape clytie

30.07.2013 16:50, Roman Ishin:

Pararge aegeria subspecies do not know. On the mainland, only this kind, the other two - Island

30.07.2013 16:50, Roman Ishin:

Pararge aegeria subspecies do not know. On the mainland, only this kind, the other two - Island

30.07.2013 16:42, Roman Ishin:

2 Alexander Martyuk
I think you have all understood from exile Shamil. This prong in the figure, it is best seen from the underside, but in some individuals it is perfectly visible from the upper side of the wing. at maera (see. ispod) line passing through the cross zhiku anal corner BM straight, with only a small "step" at a time like petropolitana there is a distinct strong tooth

30.07.2013 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The eyes-that is, once again, red like many flies. With folded wings (before soaking) up to the light at all like natural flies. We had to take pictures to raspravki (I confess, did not guess).

30.07.2013 0:24, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank Shamil. I have these images in the group joined the group and now the group is not fixed. Now, except that Peter is able to do

29.07.2013 23:41, Lev Bely:

Protsilly have, like, a slightly different picture of the lower wings https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCyzMyciOijU51nNzIreVJKH07vC8R90n0Hn6CcoCRSYajIgom, although I could be wrong.

29.07.2013 23:40, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.07.2013 23:33, Lev Bely:

Alexander, thank you, then confidence Eunica norica http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/ih/eunica0146_i.htm.

29.07.2013 22:30, Shamil Murtazin:

About as .. Ie without eyes treated? =)

29.07.2013 21:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. Type this: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/58703

29.07.2013 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, the disorder in my opinion. Illustrated form, and label data in English to download do not get any.
Label (full): "Malaysia, Pahang, Fraser's Hill, Silverpark, 3.42'54.81" N 101.44'07.65 "E Alt. = 1285m. Leg. Vishnyakov AN
22.03.2013-01.04.2013. "I can not imagine how to write Russian letters. Correct is possible? And then write a simple" Malaysia "and nekuzyavo obtained.I now have twenty types of label and do not know how to be.

29.07.2013 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

One of the many wonders of nature, as if on the front wings are traveling two flies in cocoons :)
Surprisingly ....

29.07.2013 17:01, Alex Dumchus:

Charaxes cacuthis

29.07.2013 16:06, Alex Dumchus:

Similar to P.procilla, but not sure.

29.07.2013 16:05, Alex Dumchus:

Lev.Dayu picture 22553

29.07.2013 15:41, Shamil Murtazin:

Congratulations! =)
It should be the "woman" to "stalwart" green pin ...

29.07.2013 14:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Antheraea yamamai Guenerin-Meneville, 1861

29.07.2013 11:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, this isAcronicta psi!

28.07.2013 22:57, Fyodor Pudovikov:

icarus

28.07.2013 22:09, Lev Bely:

Eunica norica? The underside should.

28.07.2013 22:03, Lev Bely:

Panacea regina?

28.07.2013 22:03, Lev Bely:

Panacea regina?

28.07.2013 21:22, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

28.07.2013 21:21, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Trophico this kind of wider: in addition to a number of tree species, the caterpillar of this type can be powered on and shrubs and some herbaceous plants

28.07.2013 21:12, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

28.07.2013 21:11, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Scopula rubiginata (Hufnagel, 1767)

28.07.2013 21:09, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

28.07.2013 19:56, Shamil Murtazin:

Tatiana, gusyanka was on the apple. Is it possible?..
O.incerta the descriptions of poplar and willow have.

28.07.2013 13:54, Yuri Semejkin:

No need to drive anywhere, even in the uncertain while there will be. Once the directory is published (hopefully I hear about it), and then carry with reference to the source.

28.07.2013 13:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, Peter. As for errors in one letter, I saw her, but unfortunately not right. Ie in your account could not be corrected.

28.07.2013 12:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, take it away again in unspecified photos. This is me yesterday nakosyachil pointing the wrong way. And indeed, enough already. By Yuri: can drive the mole in place. It is necessary to specify the description of only one year. He is known?

28.07.2013 12:24, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, you name Antherea yamamai, and the site - Antheraea yamamai. Rae instead re in a family. Such errors are common. Accordingly, when the searcher finds nothing, try to look only on the species name. Then it will be all right boot, and some reasons for conflict poischezayut.
And once again: Basil, Yuri, be tolerant.

28.07.2013 12:21, Peter Khramov:

Lord, well, how can vozbuhat for just such occasions? Well, do not understand each other and do not understand, the two rail like sane people. Do not quarrel.

28.07.2013 6:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Apatura metis or may A. ilia (in the Far East like some subspecies). Tomorrow will come to work for a normal PC and disassemble.

28.07.2013 6:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Oh yeah, Vasily. By now I've got here 357 images uploaded and according to you, I added them all without registration, didn't know it, really. Let me please still tell you that I was logged on and there was autosuggestion which fails from time to time, not only on my side (not only as to species, but gender also). It's odd that you're unaware as you're moderator. Sorry, I seem to have forgotten a bit that you don't check all the comments in the Community. Particularly, I keep repeating you the same thing for already third time. And you wrote me a "smart" instruction where should I click. Let's then be smart together, let me give you an advice. Please print out this outstanding instruction, all in capitals, and don't forget to add there a reminder for you to read replies sometimes instead of pretending there are no any. Not only you read them.
Then there will be less air-rending, as you said, and no wasting time, yours and mine. Let me take a break here and wish you the same.

28.07.2013 4:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, the short manual on how to use search is here:
http://rghost.ru/47718134
I intentionally tried to use it being logoffed, by guest account, not to rend the air again.
This works perfect on my side: you just need to login on the website, type the name of the species, click the result and upload photo. Really easy, just try...

28.07.2013 1:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Basil, personalized quote for you one more time for photo # 22939, and the magic word "yamamai! .Here Answer to your question, which explained that the search engine for all 3 pictures did not work. And if we ask the question, or gives advice, the interested in the answer, so as not to engage in the same writings in different files.
27.07.2013 12:03 Yuri Semeykin:
When sought on an Internet, I found in the catalog. But when he began to drop, no one snapshot nothing worked. Therefore, the written
07/27/2013 11:29 Vasiliy Feoktistov:
Yuri, because it is in the catalog. And the search by type of work .....
07/27/2013 11:04, Yuri Semeykin:
Antheraea yamamai Guenerin-Meneville, 1861

27.07.2013 21:35, Lev Bely:

Leodonta zenobia?

27.07.2013 21:24, Lev Bely:

Ancyluris miranda?

27.07.2013 21:04, Lev Bely:

Heliconius numata?

27.07.2013 20:56, Lev Bely:

Eunica monima?

27.07.2013 20:51, Fyodor Pudovikov:

argus

27.07.2013 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guys, seems it was my fault. Today I sorted out Saturniidae, might have moved something somewhere wrong. This larva will soon be moved back to not identified. Yury, for you personally: you should just have typed in the website search a magic word "yamamai" (without commas) and this would be cleared up in a sec as (again) this species had been catalogued long time ago. And no need in spitting saliva in vain disturbing your and someone else nervous systems.

27.07.2013 15:34, Lev Bely:

Beautiful woman.

27.07.2013 15:30, Lev Bely:

Yuri rather some system error, mixed up with your neighbor Antheraea yamamai http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22302.

27.07.2013 13:49, Yuri Semejkin:

What a crazy joke. Who just ermine moths (which is also in the catalog is not included) gave the name of the family pavlinoglazki Saturn.
Downstairs there koment to the picture that is Yponomeuta ranaiella Matsumura. Or what. Someone forgot the alphabet?

27.07.2013 12:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Photographed in a few hours (3-5) after birth

27.07.2013 12:03, Yuri Semejkin:

When sought on an Internet, I found in the catalog. But when he began to drop, no one snapshot nothing worked. Therefore, the written

27.07.2013 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, because it is in the catalog. And the search by type of work .....

27.07.2013 11:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Antheraea yamamai Guenerin-Meneville, 1861

27.07.2013 11:09, Yuri Semejkin:

It is necessary to connect a group of # 22937; 22938 and 22939. It is one and tazha individual.

27.07.2013 11:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Antheraea yamamai Guenerin-Meneville, 1861

27.07.2013 10:54, Yuri Semejkin:

A copy of the output from the pupa.
Antherea yamamai

27.07.2013 10:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Antherea yamamai

27.07.2013 8:55, Alexsandr Martukov:

Yes, and still I thought that from a translucent shade of ocher ?!)

27.07.2013 7:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pelurga comitata

27.07.2013 1:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

semiargus

27.07.2013 0:36, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

26.07.2013 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula rubiginatalikely?

26.07.2013 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lymantria monacha

25.07.2013 23:44, Alexsandr Martukov:

The broken line in postdiskalnoy the area of ​​the rear wing - that's for sure Lasiommata petropolitana.

25.07.2013 23:41, Alexsandr Martukov:

Judging by the fact that the "top of the rear wing has a broken line in the area postdiskalnoy" it Lasiommata petropolitana.

25.07.2013 23:39, Alexsandr Martukov:

Cool! Still nice to sort through. Thanks for the link, Shamil!

25.07.2013 23:35, Alexsandr Martukov:

More can be Plebejus argyrognomon (Lycaeides argyrognomon).

25.07.2013 23:29, Alexsandr Martukov:

Maybe Plebejus argus

25.07.2013 23:22, Alexsandr Martukov:

Phengaris alcon

25.07.2013 22:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Apparently, a picture.
http://insectamo.ru/component/content/article/38-rhop/opredelitel-vidov-bulavousykh-babochek/253-opredelitel-nimfalidy-satiry-satyridae-16

25.07.2013 22:28, Alexsandr Martukov:

A tooth pattern or vein?

25.07.2013 22:24, Alexsandr Martukov:

Roman Ishin, I looked at all maera online and it seemed that most of the teeth of the central cell, like petropolitana, what you said ...

25.07.2013 21:32, Lev Bely:

Ypthima pandocus?

25.07.2013 21:26, Lev Bely:

Ypthima baldus?

25.07.2013 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Transferred to Thrive in Kazakhstan.

25.07.2013 21:21, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.07.2013 21:17, Lev Bely:

Eunica bechina? http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/eunica_b_bechina_types.htm

25.07.2013 20:15, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

25.07.2013 20:13, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Caterpillar shovels kind Orthosia, not Gothic, perhaps O.incerta (?)

25.07.2013 17:24, Roman Ishin:

Lasiommata petropolitana

25.07.2013 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.07.2013 9:15, Shamil Murtazin:

I think that thisBoloria selene

25.07.2013 6:40, Yuri Semejkin:

In my opinion it Cosmia trapezina

24.07.2013 22:54, Shamil Murtazin:

favorite wallpaper: D

24.07.2013 22:48, Alexsandr Martukov:

And is not that the same thing from the same author.
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/15541

24.07.2013 22:45, Alexsandr Martukov:

It's not the same this author!)
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/15541
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/15821

24.07.2013 22:09, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

24.07.2013 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved to exact analogy with another photo of the same individual.

24.07.2013 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved to accurate.

24.07.2013 21:48, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

24.07.2013 21:47, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

24.07.2013 21:47, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

24.07.2013 21:44, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

24.07.2013 17:26, Roman Ishin:

female maera - no characteristic petropolitana teeth at the outer corner of the lower central cell lane. Wing

24.07.2013 17:05, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2013 17:05, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2013 17:05, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2013 17:04, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2013 13:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Limantria dispar

24.07.2013 9:27, Shamil Murtazin:

Ethmia bipunctella?

24.07.2013 2:01, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO most of the mayor.

24.07.2013 2:00, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO maera

24.07.2013 1:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

What latonigena Tatarstan ??? It Trivia.

24.07.2013 1:57, Eugene Karolinskiy:

icarus

24.07.2013 1:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

icarus

24.07.2013 1:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

icarus !!!

23.07.2013 21:47, Shamil Murtazin:

thank! there is not sought.

23.07.2013 21:15, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Epirrhoe alternata (Müller, 1764)

23.07.2013 20:38, Shamil Murtazin:

IMHO, "the policy of the party" to choose among the photos one view of one individual one technically good shot.
But maybe I'm still confused as always :)

23.07.2013 17:02, Alexsandr Martukov:

Do you already have confirmed and Argus and Icarus!)

23.07.2013 15:49, Alexsandr Martukov:

Plebeius argyrognomon

23.07.2013 15:49, Alexsandr Martukov:

Plebeius argyrognomon

23.07.2013 15:48, Alexsandr Martukov:

Plebeius argyrognomon

23.07.2013 15:44, Alexsandr Martukov:

Lasiommata petropolitana. Male.

23.07.2013 15:42, Alexsandr Martukov:

Lasiommata petropolitana. Female.

23.07.2013 15:10, Igor Sakhno:

I think that the scales themselves can also be subject to fading.

23.07.2013 11:30, Alexsandr Martukov:

Shamil, as far as I noticed moderator (moderators) are selected on their best score. How do I know that you liked and what is not?

23.07.2013 11:23, Alexsandr Martukov:

Argynnis adippe

23.07.2013 11:13, Alexsandr Martukov:

Melitaea latonigena

23.07.2013 10:42, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Moth genus Lithostege, maybe she L.farinata, while in East Kazakhstan likely L.narynensis PROUT, 1938.

23.07.2013 10:04, Shamil Murtazin:

That was the question =)
Anyway. Those who know better.

22.07.2013 21:17, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with other fotoy from the same individual.

22.07.2013 21:17, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

22.07.2013 12:23, Shamil Murtazin:

favorite wallpaper ...
butterfly found no similar.

22.07.2013 12:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Cydia pomonella

22.07.2013 12:20, Shamil Murtazin:

Ethmia bipunctella?

22.07.2013 12:12, Peter Khramov:

Who else, then?

22.07.2013 2:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M.? Athalia, female

22.07.2013 2:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

22.07.2013 2:27, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

22.07.2013 2:26, Eugene Karolinskiy:

female

22.07.2013 2:26, Eugene Karolinskiy:

dispar

21.07.2013 23:03, Igor Sakhno:

Palemon?

21.07.2013 23:03, Igor Sakhno:

Probably still Palemon

21.07.2013 23:02, Igor Sakhno:

Similar to Palemon

21.07.2013 22:51, Igor Sakhno:

Can still summer Levan?

21.07.2013 22:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you! :)

21.07.2013 22:06, Shamil Murtazin:

Alexander, you will forgive me generously, but the next three pictures are almost identical to this. Does it make sense to post them all? =)

21.07.2013 20:10, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Strelchatka likely Acronicta (Triaena) psi (Linnaeus, 1758)

21.07.2013 18:55, Peter Khramov:

Thank postponed.

21.07.2013 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Boris, tell me something ...

21.07.2013 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maniola jurtina

21.07.2013 3:39, Maxim Schwarz:

Lycaena virgaureae, male

20.07.2013 22:01, Igor Sakhno:

Pandora

20.07.2013 13:10, Igor Sakhno:

Confirmation accidentally pressed.

20.07.2013 13:09, Igor Sakhno:

Thank you! There were a few females, but with such dots - one.

20.07.2013 13:08, Igor Sakhno: This species is identified correctly.

20.07.2013 2:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Battus philenor

20.07.2013 0:50, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

20.07.2013 0:50, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2013 16:32, Roman Ishin:

Apamea sublustris (ESPER, 1788)

19.07.2013 16:22, Roman Ishin:

Pararge aegeria (Linnaeus 1758)

19.07.2013 16:18, Roman Ishin:

Eilicrinia trinotata (Metzner, 1845)

18.07.2013 23:14, Maxim Schwarz:

Congratulations!

18.07.2013 17:15, Shamil Murtazin:

Just checked. Dolly Live: wiggles "tail."

18.07.2013 17:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Please forgive me. Overlooked. =)

18.07.2013 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All the same it is not the imago. They have a sample in stages: it is necessary to edit :)

18.07.2013 13:20, Shamil Murtazin:

The award went to the hero. Thank you.

18.07.2013 7:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is exactly Pavonia? Why not cocoon? From this caterpillar: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22580?
Last age: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22489 (warts always have a yellow color with a very diverse primary color)
And cocoons obtained from the pupae of geese: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22705 (pupa in the cocoon always and now I wait for the hour of about thirty).

17.07.2013 16:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is probably a bug in the photo is not Maliattha amorpha, kind of I do not know, but I assume that this is not Noctuidae, but something of Pyraloidea.

17.07.2013 15:43, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

17.07.2013 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, changed the definition of the author)

17.07.2013 11:13, Shamil Murtazin:

determination of the kind made Alexander Zhakov =)

17.07.2013 1:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Celastrina argiolus

16.07.2013 23:49, Shamil Murtazin:

so happy but rider ...

16.07.2013 22:35, Svetlana Karaeva:

Thank you and me :)

16.07.2013 19:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lacanobia w-latinum

16.07.2013 19:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, I too confused. :-)

16.07.2013 18:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Perth, neither of which you are not confused? :-)

16.07.2013 7:10, Shamil Murtazin:

minos / purpuralis
clarify any way.

16.07.2013 7:10, Shamil Murtazin:

minos / purpuralis
clarify any way.

15.07.2013 19:47, Peter Khramov:

Put it in the exact ...

15.07.2013 19:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved to clear Minos.

15.07.2013 19:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Vasiliy Feoktistov molbiole "clear minos"

15.07.2013 1:05, Evgeny Slobodskoy:

It appears this Gandaritis whitelyi (Butler, 1878)

14.07.2013 21:27, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

13.07.2013 22:02, Nickolay Kiselev:

Good mimicry

12.07.2013 10:37, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, you could call it ...

12.07.2013 7:02, Shamil Murtazin:

This stack. sharpness across the frame.

12.07.2013 1:42, Peter Khramov:

On horseback, too, is too much sharpening in Photoshop ...

12.07.2013 1:40, Peter Khramov:

Yes, you can, of course, why not. This is now added to the group.

12.07.2013 1:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved, thank you.

11.07.2013 1:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

E. tages

11.07.2013 0:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Horse-size ...
http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/9306/101048236.0/0_10f5c1_86f1d94_XXXL.jpg

11.07.2013 0:13, Shamil Murtazin:

I thought so: at first it was just to do.
Otherwise, I had a couple of times so it was good ... straightened fell, broke, etc.
Those with a broken antennkami (
Soon, once again I put the rails. And it will be a qualitative macro :-D

11.07.2013 0:12, Peter Khramov:

So on Kingsize will huzhee only. This is not the case in the bed ...

11.07.2013 0:11, Peter Khramov:

Clothespin got good color.

11.07.2013 0:09, Peter Khramov:

Ok, corrected.

11.07.2013 0:09, Shamil Murtazin:

Let's hope. I would like to function - download king size)
Spiracles made noticeable pores any side light illuminates)

11.07.2013 0:08, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

11.07.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

11.07.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

11.07.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

11.07.2013 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Let it be inaccurate in sinapisah.

11.07.2013 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Thank you for your review, postponed.

11.07.2013 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.07.2013 0:05, Shamil Murtazin:

This photo is now generally outside the group.
probably more than 7 can not be combined (

11.07.2013 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Well, about the kind of - you know, that here I am not strong.

11.07.2013 0:04, Peter Khramov:

Thank postponed.

11.07.2013 0:04, Peter Khramov:

Everything else will!

11.07.2013 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

11.07.2013 0:01, Peter Khramov:

Corrected mess with groups. Now everything is OK?

11.07.2013 0:00, Shamil Murtazin:

# 22427
it also.

10.07.2013 23:59, Shamil Murtazin:

tried so hard ... all ubilas detail ...

10.07.2013 23:57, Shamil Murtazin:

# 22582
it also. It does not fit in with the group.

10.07.2013 23:10, Igor Sakhno:

This, by the way, in the same valley, between Alekseyevka and Pyatikhatki.

10.07.2013 21:38, Vladimir Farutin:

It seems that this genus Heliconius, and what is the kind of concrete can not say.

10.07.2013 2:44, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Cool! :)

09.07.2013 2:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

sylvestris

09.07.2013 0:41, Lev Bely:

Petr, you'd better comment the very species:)

08.07.2013 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, portable ...

08.07.2013 21:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Masha, bravo. Vitaly can sometimes be wrong :))

08.07.2013 18:42, Masha Gill:

Trachea atriplicis

08.07.2013 10:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eriogaster lanestris

08.07.2013 8:31, Shamil Murtazin:

view defined, but not transferred to the form.

08.07.2013 2:08, Peter Khramov:

ABOUT! Loew!

08.07.2013 1:01, Lev Bely:

Zygaena punctum?

08.07.2013 1:01, Lev Bely:

Zygaena punctum?

07.07.2013 23:23, Shamil Murtazin:

By zygaenidae I do not know yet to what side to go ...

07.07.2013 23:21, Shamil Murtazin:

Not mastered.
I Guess T. lineola vs T. sylvestris?

07.07.2013 16:02, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, sent.

07.07.2013 15:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Cosmia trapezina

07.07.2013 1:31, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

06.07.2013 19:53, Maxim Schwarz:

Cerura vinula?

06.07.2013 14:22, Maxim Schwarz:

Thank you! By the way in a northerly direction and caught. Everything is as it is written.

06.07.2013 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Odezia atrata

06.07.2013 2:00, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

06.07.2013 1:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

... or L. juvernica (aka reali) :)

05.07.2013 23:47, Maxim Schwarz:

It - Leptidea sinapis

05.07.2013 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

up

04.07.2013 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Beauty: -)

04.07.2013 20:38, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

04.07.2013 20:38, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

04.07.2013 20:38, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

04.07.2013 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2013 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2013 14:37, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2013 13:43, Maxim Schwarz:

The joint outing with Andrew buttercup.

04.07.2013 2:11, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, sent to purpuralisam.

04.07.2013 0:17, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

03.07.2013 15:50, Peter Khramov:

Ugums some reason everyone who wants to - can not be, because It is in the regions at this time -)

03.07.2013 12:03, Shamil Murtazin:

Rekvestiruyu even used video :)

03.07.2013 9:40, Peter Khramov:

Urgently go to print blind!)

03.07.2013 7:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

sign? - Russian is a comma in the English keyboard is :(

03.07.2013 7:44, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

03.07.2013 7:44, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

03.07.2013 7:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

SheEulithis populata? Peter bravely endure. :)

02.07.2013 23:54, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Cyaniris semiargus

02.07.2013 22:56, Peter Khramov:

There is a thinking meet with those who are not indifferent to the collection and storage of insects, I drag with a dozen entomological boxes from various manufacturers (three Russian and two European), respectively, it will be possible to feel / posravnivat them all in one place, and at the same time to drink a beer / coffee break and chat.Landmarks of time - 11 or 13 July geography - Moscow Taganskaya (obsuzhdaemo). If you are interested, write to the subject or email me, we will synchronize with the people modeling, and Lepstora Molbiola under this deal.

02.07.2013 22:53, Peter Khramov:

Ok, portable.

02.07.2013 21:16, Fyodor Pudovikov:

I agree with Evgeny, I hastened ...

02.07.2013 19:18, Alex Dumchus:

Thyridia themisto?

02.07.2013 19:16, Alex Dumchus:

Stalachtis latefasciata?

02.07.2013 19:14, Alex Dumchus:

Rhetus dysoni?

02.07.2013 19:03, Alex Dumchus:

Eunica amelia?

02.07.2013 19:01, Alex Dumchus:

Eunica chrysochlora?

02.07.2013 19:01, Alex Dumchus:

Eunica chrysochlora?

02.07.2013 18:47, Alex Dumchus:

Adelpha phylaca ???

02.07.2013 18:43, Alex Dumchus:

Epiphile lampethusa?

02.07.2013 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

02.07.2013 12:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can-you upload pictures of dolls here? Interesting.

02.07.2013 12:02, Andrei Komrakov:

Pyrausta purpuralis (Linnaeus, 1758)?

02.07.2013 11:19, Andrei Komrakov:

I note as a curious fact: the caterpillar pupate before reaching the age of 5 (my guess is that the photo caterpillar 2nd age you can confirm or correct me, as do their cultivation). Why is this not very clear.

02.07.2013 4:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Ypsolopha parenthesella L

01.07.2013 21:18, Igor Sakhno:

Thank you!

01.07.2013 19:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Yes, I have something like a cocoon, and the very bad gusyanku considered - stuffed into a container, and it pupate during the campaign)
So I am wondering who's there ...

01.07.2013 19:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes certainly already left. Thank God they already flew to Moscow and the Moscow region. Mass departures this year, we have suffered. Approx. 2.5 packs of weeks ago from her balcony threw in the morning. Even the theme emerged: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=530236

01.07.2013 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

According to him the theme: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=359451
Can there be found or just lay there.

01.07.2013 16:14, Igor Sakhno:

Yes, it is definitely not. How to be?

01.07.2013 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, notPennisetia hylaeiformisfound myself, I know it. Generally these trubas sesiidae.

01.07.2013 3:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes common plastic cup out of kvass. I each caterpillar and lives in a single glass. And then because of the large size of the larvae, I put it in a separate container and for some reason there and put a glass. Caterpillar, despite the fact that there were branches in the tank, yet chose glass.

01.07.2013 2:56, Peter Khramov:

Fedor, confidence is?

01.07.2013 1:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO B. ino

30.06.2013 18:19, Shamil Murtazin:

The process goes!
And what a cocoon? Some transparent arched design ... :)

30.06.2013 17:49, Igor Sakhno:

Perhaps Bembeci hylaeiformis

30.06.2013 14:21, Igor Sakhno:

Maybe it. The area, like, fit.

30.06.2013 13:07, Shamil Murtazin:

Andrew, a butterfly came out there? ..
I very much like the cocoon is.

30.06.2013 12:54, Shamil Murtazin:

In general, the menu favorite - it leaves ordinary cherry. Eat with a distinctive crunch)

30.06.2013 8:49, Alex Dumchus:

Yes, I was just about subspecies temper. Of course views! But if you put in a number of demodocus, erithonioides, and even add an Asian demoleus - hell difference, though demoleus will be less.

30.06.2013 8:45, Alex Dumchus:

I have it written as Prepona demophon, and there are two photos podvida.Ya gave one. No Archaeoprepona camilla I do not know. Maybe on the park the wrong button pressed? Please understand and forgive. It Prepona demophon. .Please correct.

30.06.2013 6:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Family Saturniidae. And the rest are not sure. According to the description boisdyuvalya like Saturn, but there are doubts

30.06.2013 1:58, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, the other Fota same individual is registered to the wrong kind. Where is the truth?

30.06.2013 1:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

30.06.2013 1:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

30.06.2013 1:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

30.06.2013 1:06, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Brenthis daphne

30.06.2013 1:02, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Thetidia smaragdaria

30.06.2013 1:02, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Thetidia smaragdaria

30.06.2013 0:32, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

30.06.2013 0:11, Igor Sakhno: This species is identified correctly.

29.06.2013 23:12, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

OK got it

29.06.2013 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Coenonympha glycerion

29.06.2013 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And it is always difficult Danainae .....

29.06.2013 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

DV vestimo: HZ.

29.06.2013 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

29.06.2013 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

29.06.2013 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I have no doubt: Masha law.

29.06.2013 20:34, Peter Khramov:

Refinement made.

29.06.2013 20:34, Peter Khramov:

Refinement made.

29.06.2013 20:34, Peter Khramov:

Refinement made.

29.06.2013 20:34, Peter Khramov:

Refinement made.

29.06.2013 20:34, Peter Khramov:

Refinement made.

29.06.2013 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Refinement made.

29.06.2013 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Refinement made.

29.06.2013 20:33, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:32, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with the adjacent photo from the same individual.

29.06.2013 20:32, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Why erithonioides, if it is a subspecies?

29.06.2013 20:30, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Hard case; -)

29.06.2013 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Another opinion is at someone?

29.06.2013 20:28, Peter Khramov:

A chtr for hog?

29.06.2013 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Hard case or not? (strictly looks over his glasses.)

29.06.2013 20:27, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:27, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:26, Peter Khramov:

MOVED. Alex, if several fotah shows one and the same individual, place, please note in this section uploaded images in the LC.

29.06.2013 20:25, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:25, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:25, Peter Khramov:

Thank you suffered.

29.06.2013 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Sent is in ill-defined.

29.06.2013 20:24, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:23, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:23, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Right, right. So it will be safer! -)

29.06.2013 20:22, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:21, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

29.06.2013 20:21, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

28.06.2013 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UP

28.06.2013 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UP
This is me them not stale :)

28.06.2013 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UP

28.06.2013 11:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UP

28.06.2013 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think right. One like the color of the hair on the back of the brush do not know.
And about effektnosti tracks compared to the imago: this is normal.
A pair of vivid examples:Acronicta acerisandCalliteara pudibunda.

28.06.2013 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just a suggestion:Catocala nymphagogait can not be?

28.06.2013 8:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, horns, I paid no attention. Eugene rights.

28.06.2013 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pseudopanthera macularia

28.06.2013 7:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you!

28.06.2013 2:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not ... with horns, but ... Araschnia levana.

27.06.2013 23:55, Igor Sakhno:

Congratulations!

27.06.2013 22:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Cool disguise! )

27.06.2013 21:15, Shamil Murtazin:

On molbiole zaopredelili how Ostrinia nubilalis
With me everything turns out the area ...

27.06.2013 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aphantopus hyperantus

27.06.2013 18:37, Irina Vasilieva:

I hope that is true, I am not an expert. It seemed to me that the track looks much more spectacular butterflies

27.06.2013 18:35, Irina Vasilieva: This species is identified correctly.

27.06.2013 18:32, Irina Vasilieva:

Thank you for your determination. I looked at the other photos of my very bad, if you do not need - remove, no offense

27.06.2013 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Notodonta ziczac

27.06.2013 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Notodonta ziczac

27.06.2013 16:10, Peter Khramov:

A. We Vasily direct word for word.

27.06.2013 15:13, Peter Khramov:

Yes, certainly it is. MOVED.

27.06.2013 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He is (both pictured).
Natalia, you should make it a rule to specify in addition to more space and date of shooting. This is extremely important in determining.

27.06.2013 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aglais io

27.06.2013 8:34, Fyodor Pudovikov:

no

27.06.2013 5:46, Shamil Murtazin:

Seems like
Euthrix potatoria

27.06.2013 5:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Seems like
Euthrix potatoria

27.06.2013 1:25, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

26.06.2013 19:44, Shamil Murtazin:

ABOUT! Same
Melanargia russiae

26.06.2013 18:57, Peter Khramov:

Shoko harmonious Albian rope.

26.06.2013 8:44, Shamil Murtazin:

Hooray! =)
Is this color melanism?

26.06.2013 1:55, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Scopula immutata (Linnaeus, 1758)

26.06.2013 1:53, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

26.06.2013 1:53, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

26.06.2013 0:41, Lev Bely:

Hard case or simply lost in the uncertain?

26.06.2013 0:17, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

Then we wait for what they say specialists.

25.06.2013 22:53, Peter Khramov:

-)

25.06.2013 16:22, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

25.06.2013 16:21, Peter Khramov:

Chocolate albatross very ponra me. Hooked straight title for the soul ...

25.06.2013 16:19, Peter Khramov:

Mota into their heads.

25.06.2013 16:10, Peter Khramov:

Sure sure. If I remember correctly, that this story with guglomypami almost two years, and the present cheater who took it over - the sixth.

25.06.2013 15:24, Masha Gill:

It Diachrysia stenochrysis

25.06.2013 11:59, Shamil Murtazin:

I assume it
Melitaea diamina

25.06.2013 11:58, Shamil Murtazin:

We look forward to how the pie from the oven =)

25.06.2013 10:36, Shamil Murtazin:

and not the fact that I am right =) to define a train.

25.06.2013 9:31, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

Yes, it's the same one the previous butterfly. She "walked on straw and shows itself from all sides. Thank Shamil!

25.06.2013 8:36, Shamil Murtazin:

If the previous pictures - underside of the same butterfly, assume it
Melitaea diamina

25.06.2013 7:55, Alex Dumchus:

This isnt a mistake? This is normal. Often write a subspecies rather than the form. It's good not switched to English names such as White butterfly princess, Common Mormon Chocolate albatross ...

25.06.2013 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mimoides ariarathes
Commerce has write errors. Well, how can that be?

24.06.2013 22:24, Shamil Murtazin:

That's why the second run ... :(
so is eating everything, even annoying.
But yesterday although some twig not even take a bite ...

24.06.2013 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

At Willow, it is easy to feed in the suburbs. One problem: tahini (these are parasitic flies) are very fond of her. You do not know who will: a doll, or instead of it flies .....

24.06.2013 21:54, Shamil Murtazin:

Here and top and underside at the same time =)

24.06.2013 21:53, Shamil Murtazin:

Automatically packs for photos put down the top of the wings .... :(

24.06.2013 21:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here itDanaus eresimus
And subspecies plexaure (Godart, 1819) should be added.

24.06.2013 20:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here it is: Danaus eresimus plexaure (Godart, 1819)
http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxon/id400188/
The head can be broken ...

24.06.2013 18:57, Alex Dumchus:

On the label is written Eurytides ariarthes

24.06.2013 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

On the label is written danaus plexaure

24.06.2013 18:34, Alex Dumchus:

Apparently P.demodocus subspecies from Madagascar

24.06.2013 17:52, Yuri Semejkin:

So that probably albeit in uncertain pobudet

24.06.2013 17:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Sorry. Ps. The Catalogue of Lepidoptera of Russia, he did not drive, but will be given in the Catalogue of the Czech. LW

24.06.2013 16:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All-knowing Google it does not know ..... I do not know how to drive in the form

24.06.2013 14:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Orgyia recens

24.06.2013 12:15, Svetlana Shchavelina:

In April this year, a small group (my friend and fellow Thai) traveled to the north-east Thailand. We have an interest in the region plant Hoya (Hoya) and we were curious to see them in their natural habitat, and generally interesting all associated. In the area of ​​Mount Phu Wua had a great desire to visit a local waterfall, becauseour favorite Hoya often settle along the water flow. On the waterfall itself, by itself, would hardly look at that because of the aridity. Turning on the road to the waterfall path was blocked by a barrier. Out guard and something spoke to our accompanying Thais. Then we opened the road, we climb anywhere like ...It was only later, after a few days, we laughingly said, it turns out, the waterfall area was closed to the public, but the guard my friend and was presented as Professor (? !!!) From Russia who came to shoot butterflies !!! Of course we were sitting in the car with smart entities (as did not understand what they were interpreted) DSLRs around their necks and glasses ...Here is a small episode from my trip.

24.06.2013 0:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you, Alexander! Yes, sort of like really. Then remove, moreover, that the picture is not very

23.06.2013 22:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, you have already exhibited this type :))
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13851
Ptycholoma imitator

23.06.2013 22:19, Shamil Murtazin:

Olga, whatever Cambodian passengers?

23.06.2013 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Clostera curtula

23.06.2013 22:17, Shamil Murtazin:

Well slavnenko =)
thank!

23.06.2013 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia incerta

23.06.2013 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula nigropunctata

23.06.2013 20:23, Shamil Murtazin:

Anyway incorrectly identified)
Scopula virgulata?

23.06.2013 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula ornata

23.06.2013 17:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pyralis farinalis

23.06.2013 12:28, Peter Khramov:

Cope Wright! -))

23.06.2013 11:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

23.06.2013 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

23.06.2013 11:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

23.06.2013 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

23.06.2013 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

23.06.2013 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

23.06.2013 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

23.06.2013 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

23.06.2013 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

23.06.2013 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female

23.06.2013 10:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrew, this is not "yellow press":) I Pavonia FIVE ages. Who is he doing to her breeding and pupation still very far away. At last, the fifth feature of the age: the warts yellow, not black.
The fifth age I recently lecturing: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22489 now sitting in my house in the insectarium: up-still eating raspberries and weave a cocoon is not going to.

23.06.2013 9:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Custidia stratonice

23.06.2013 9:11, Andrei Komrakov:

Pavonia, the 2nd age. She's sitting on a leaf geraniums marsh. I usually found them on meadowsweet or willows. What is interesting is conveyed to the house - time to pupate.

23.06.2013 9:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Custidia stratonice

23.06.2013 9:04, Yuri Semejkin:

"Kabanchik" grows

23.06.2013 2:31, Yuri Semejkin:

Yponomeuta ranaiella Matsumura

23.06.2013 0:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Igor, thank you!

22.06.2013 23:06, Igor Sakhno:

Unfortunately just noticed your question. If they are still alive and, most likely, already badly battered.

22.06.2013 22:59, Igor Sakhno:

It's almost at the beginning of Alexis "valley", on the trail of the field along the stream drying up.

22.06.2013 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just kind of where I live is not never seen at any stage. A successfully collect about 80 km away. East of my city.

22.06.2013 16:23, Lev Bely:

"Falcon and the Hawk, stop litter Live! And by the way, Hawk, 41 minutes from Anzor size does not, and I ... How to get it?"
:)

22.06.2013 14:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Yponomeuta ranaiella Matsumura

22.06.2013 11:36, Igor Sakhno:

That would dissolve, and so do we have such a small population, artificial, somewhere near Kharkov!

22.06.2013 8:38, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

Alexander, thank you

21.06.2013 23:55, Peter Khramov:

Dim, and why are you silent? All tyrnet not establish?

21.06.2013 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, a good additive.

21.06.2013 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the help!

21.06.2013 23:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

21.06.2013 23:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

21.06.2013 23:53, Peter Khramov:

I think so (s).

21.06.2013 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Gramm, a gram. Because not to substitute a gun, maybe ...

21.06.2013 19:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Herpetogamma magna

21.06.2013 14:00, Lev Bely:

Beautiful butterfly.

21.06.2013 13:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Phymatopus hecta

21.06.2013 13:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brenthis ino

21.06.2013 13:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Atolmis rubricollis

21.06.2013 13:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Atolmis rubricollis

21.06.2013 13:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Atolmis rubricollis

21.06.2013 12:47, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

I do not know the name ...

21.06.2013 11:35, Peter Khramov:

And then even more help.

21.06.2013 11:35, Peter Khramov:

Help Alexander help; -)

21.06.2013 10:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alex, you'll specify the name or help? :)

21.06.2013 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alex, you'll specify the name or help? :)

21.06.2013 3:12, Peter Khramov:

Demetrius, confirmed?

21.06.2013 3:11, Peter Khramov:

Uh, how exotic!

21.06.2013 3:09, Peter Khramov:

Togo uzho everything will look. Probably. Probably. Maybe. Maybe.

21.06.2013 3:06, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

21.06.2013 3:06, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

21.06.2013 3:05, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

21.06.2013 3:04, Peter Khramov:

Pere worn.

21.06.2013 2:59, Peter Khramov:

Well so I was like about a subspecies, not a kind, they say, for the time being to the form tokmo without specifying.

20.06.2013 21:42, Alex Dumchus:

Our super. Then share the experience. I have a house and raspberries can be acquired when Gren.

20.06.2013 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I have gathered the same jib. Now the main thing that happened. That report: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=526321&view=findpost&p=1415121

20.06.2013 19:23, Pavel Kirillov:

Adelpha sp.

20.06.2013 19:23, Pavel Kirillov:

Adelpha sp.

20.06.2013 19:23, Pavel Kirillov:

Adelpha sp.

20.06.2013 16:16, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

20.06.2013 16:16, Sergei Kotov:

Boloria titania

20.06.2013 16:16, Sergei Kotov:

Boloria titania

20.06.2013 16:16, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

20.06.2013 15:46, Alex Dumchus:

The photo 22595-22601 hybrids gelikonis

20.06.2013 15:40, Alex Dumchus:

And Cho meanwhile, except glaucippe leucippe and other similar in the South East Asia is not

20.06.2013 15:37, Alex Dumchus:

Spasibo.Budu very grateful. I am pleased to have raised himself S.puri, in my yard 9 apple trees, but we need somewhere to take Greenough, and now probably too late.

20.06.2013 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander, I wish to add. Today I'm going to look for caterpillars Pavonia and if successful I will go - I will try to bring to you. But the result will not be until next spring: the long process of her, and try to get it the first time.

19.06.2013 23:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Greenough people there last month sold http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=228188&view=findpost&p=1408867
True it is necessary to grow, but they live and so fresh catch Figure: males day fly very fast and nimble on the most windbreak: quality catch hardly turn-only net izorvёsh in the trash.These features only female and bait and bring it even necessary to completely unfertilized was. Try to contact may still remain: butterflies are not very rare (it's just the first time I gathered). Surely there will be more proposals: hatching her big this year in MO and surrounding areas.

19.06.2013 22:31, Alex Dumchus:

On molbiol sometimes I go. Proposals for Pavone saw. And the prices are much cheaper to buy ... somewhere on the import sites, not to mention the bezsaytovyh suppliers. With delivery is cheaper than Molbiole.

19.06.2013 21:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Oh, already flying! .. It is necessary to Aslykul.
A home gusyanka has not even pupate.

19.06.2013 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes I did the first time on the tracks I came in the Vladimir region and decided to try to withdraw. You are on "molbiole" spend time: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showforum=40 Look theme: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=228188 Or come to Moscow in the autumn of bursa : http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=525731 There will definitely be they a lot more interesting.

19.06.2013 20:43, Alex Dumchus:

Vasiliy.Vopros: I have no Pavon in the collection, it so happens that we have, they do not fly. Do not tell me where you can buy a pair?

19.06.2013 20:39, Alex Dumchus:

Basil. Big thanks to him!

19.06.2013 20:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I intervene: Guys, well, what's the fuss?
Open OnlineEuphaedra caerulescensand watch "Full name": Synonyms it. "Casket just opened": Euphaedra (Xypetana) caerulescens Grose-Smith, 1890 = Euphaedra cyanea Holland, 1920 = Euphaedra (Xypetana) caerulescens. :)

19.06.2013 19:44, Alex Dumchus:

PS. And if your dude staring at Google and there instead of Cyanea, pops Caerulescens, I have it with a mustache. You can check foty.

19.06.2013 19:37, Alex Dumchus:

Not lazy, looked at his euph. Four of them are similar to each other as brothers, 4 more - like cousins, I got it from odnog nezabugornogo guy, he, in turn, from Africa (I do not associate with Africa - where some crooks).So, Africans do not bother signed and stamped envelopes butterfly title (I have a lot of bags left), maybe that is not so nashtampovali. If your man correctly identified, it would respect and uvazhuha.

19.06.2013 19:13, Alex Dumchus:

Peter. Can you give me the picture number, as E.syanea not on the list, and I'll try to remember from whom he received the butterfly and restore justice.

19.06.2013 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I should add that if I am not mistaken is the fourth age (five to pupation).

19.06.2013 11:39, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Brenthis ino (Rottemburg, 1775)

19.06.2013 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pavonia, Pavonia, she is (more to look like nobody MO) :)
My house is now two such raspberries guzzle. Tomorrow probably still go there to look for them.

19.06.2013 2:21, Peter Khramov:

Meanwhile sent to Hebomoia glaucippe.

19.06.2013 2:20, Peter Khramov:

I put down the name.

19.06.2013 2:20, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, put down.

19.06.2013 2:18, Peter Khramov:

Eeh means a sigh about the beauty of Peru ... By the way, Alexander, then one man wrote to me zabugorny that your shot Euphaedra cyanea still belongs to another species ... Look, the truth is that we can not ...

19.06.2013 2:14, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, removed.

18.06.2013 22:38, Maxim Schwarz:

Saturnia pavonia?

18.06.2013 19:51, Shamil Murtazin:

The underside me confused.
On molbiole defined as Boloria titania

18.06.2013 19:00, Alex Dumchus:

Petr.Chto means - eeh? Not that country called Honduras?

18.06.2013 18:58, Alex Dumchus:

It seems, glaucippe. Subspecies can not be determined. Met with such in Tae, just more grasping at Sachek, not foto.Da shy and they, unlike, for example, from Juno or Tsetozy.

18.06.2013 16:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Luechdorfia puziloi

18.06.2013 16:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Luechdorfia puziloi

18.06.2013 15:21, Peter Khramov:

Eeh ...

18.06.2013 6:14, Shamil Murtazin:

What they are beautiful in Peru :)

17.06.2013 19:19, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

In the morning I met him early in the grass. We land on a dandelion ... I sat on the edge of the woods and fields.

17.06.2013 19:13, Shamil Murtazin:

Looks very impressive =)
I also have this in the freezer. While it may catch small ... night without lights.

17.06.2013 18:58, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

No, really took off with the amendment to -1. Therefore, the intensity of the color stronger.

17.06.2013 18:48, Shamil Murtazin:

Wow what shade! Photo tsvetokorrektirovalos?

17.06.2013 10:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Thanks Basil! I saw the add-on. but just once all the old-fashioned, out of habit. For the future, I will consider.

17.06.2013 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As an example, I add your information on forage plants. Why clutter up the page with the photo when you can take the Old and add yourself to the main page?

17.06.2013 8:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yuri, on the page with opisapiem kind written by Sinev: "Regions of Russia: Primorye, Sakhalin and South Kuril. Sinev S. Yu et al., 2008." . In the end, you can add the missing information itself about the form by clicking on "Add Video Info" indicating sources or without.

17.06.2013 8:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! With your permission I would like to draw attention to the butterfly, which is considered vagrants in the Primorsky Territory. To date, to my knowledge no one has ever found in the eggs of any Pr.krae or caterpillars of this butterfly. What vrochem more of nothing says.In recent decades, the country appear and disappear various species of flora and fauna. And who knows, maybe somebody will find, for example the same tracks, here in Primorye. Moreover, the food supply for them in the Primorsky Territory there. But more on that later. In the meantime, little official information.
Family Danaidae Doisduval, 1833- monarch.
The only kind of Parantica sita Moore, 1848 Danaus sieve.Asian tropic-subtropical species. On the territory of Primorsky Krai recorded some individuals and in some years, perhaps only as vagrants (subspecies Pstytia Kollar, 1848). Flight of adults: the beginning of August to mid-October (sometimes in mid-June). SOURCE: AB Martynenko Field identification of butterflies (LEPIDOPTERA, DIURNA) Primorye Territory.Ussuriisk 2000
On an Internet butterflies but also recorded Primorye and Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands
Now feed. Forage base of the butterfly are plants of the family Asclepiaceae. In Primorye, the following types of plants grow, this family:
1. Vincetoxicum acuminatum (Lastoven pointed);
2.Metaplexis japonica (Japanese Metapleksis)
On Sakhalin grows Cynanchum caudatum (Lastoven tailed)
To be guided in the search for traces of butterflies, you can also on the caterpillars and pupae. Description caterpillars and pupae taken from an Internet: Caterpillar, off-white, with transverse lines in each segment. The head is black with gray spots, black legs.As can be seen from the description of the caterpillar is quite noticeable.
Kukolka- pale emerald green, golden yellow spots
That is: Where something. So, go ahead and gentlemen. But what if...........................

16.06.2013 17:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Luechdorfia puziloi

16.06.2013 14:18, Shamil Murtazin:

Everything will be ;)
Butterfly on boards in the refrigerator.
I have problems with retaining legs and "shipchikov" on straightened.
And that such a small, compared with the previous. =)
As a result, he tore the same wing, minus a couple of feet.
But in the photo will not be seen, I think.
It seems necessary to have in "our" shop bought :)

16.06.2013 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Who can say that it is a living butterfly, let him first cast a stone at me :)))

16.06.2013 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Alex, do not get excited, you're doing all right. Mail look, everything is painted ...

16.06.2013 13:54, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Lesh, but think: Well I do not know how to define, so others are able to. And who will help Russian-language website of the butterflies? !!! I would not know what to exotic locations you visited. I am too, and now I try to remove the most of all the fluttering in his path. So that...

16.06.2013 13:06, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

I understand that I am doing something wrong. Probably no longer be able to post pictures, as I originally said that I was not Monsieur Paganel, and can not determine the butterflies. Initially, it was not an obstacle. Now everything is changing, and I was already required by the definition. I'm sorry - I can not comply with such a high standard.I'm sorry to trouble you and your junk littering your website.

16.06.2013 12:52, Peter Khramov:

Between the living and copy collector closer to the Collector's ... Can kanesh in dried rename ... But do not understand ...

16.06.2013 11:50, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Once at the "Collector / straightened instance" does not pull ... Just dead butterfly ...

16.06.2013 5:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, of the admin have to butterfly Photo # 22268 (http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22268) clean the place: in limbo. Do not tie it to someone, probably a bug :)

15.06.2013 17:23, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

15.06.2013 17:00, Peter Khramov:

Well, I transferred to inaccurate males.

15.06.2013 16:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.06.2013 14:56, Elena Sidorenko:

Thank you, Alexander. It's really, Trachea atriplicis.

15.06.2013 14:51, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

15.06.2013 14:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

It is necessary to fix itTrachea atriplicis

15.06.2013 12:57, Peter Khramov:

No, why.

14.06.2013 22:32, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

Here I am in the dark all this ... Now it is clear ...

14.06.2013 21:51, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Lesh, not labor to bring forth, can only be removed within 1 hour after loading.

14.06.2013 21:42, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

Firefox does not help ... Apparently no school in your browser. Maybe on my account does not have permission to remove?

14.06.2013 19:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Try Firefox:
http://www.mozilla.org/ru/firefox/new/

14.06.2013 19:57, Shamil Murtazin:

Try

14.06.2013 19:08, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

I'm on safari at MacOsX not put daw, unfortunately ... I tried - does not go out. A square like sleep ...

14.06.2013 18:47, Shamil Murtazin:

I'd also lived in a biotope)

14.06.2013 18:44, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, I think that you can send still there on the rez discussion inaccurate Eumedonia eumedon, reviews etc. Is no longer there.

14.06.2013 18:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Login with your username and password to the site.
Press the top of the "Edit old".
Tick ​​unwanted photo (next to the "Photo # .....")
And then at the bottom click "Refresh Data and Delete selected image".

14.06.2013 18:36, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

I got it. And how now to remove it?

14.06.2013 18:05, Irina Nikulina:

(Peter, this is the question of the completeness of species composition :))

14.06.2013 17:57, Irina Nikulina:

In the treasury of reservoirs)))

14.06.2013 15:46, Shamil Murtazin:

To remove the?

14.06.2013 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

There was, I still poulybalsya through 3 specific photo was. But probably I hurried, everything was still in the process. :)

14.06.2013 14:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! Not everything is always just another kind would have been called spices. While pobudet no view, but we'll see.

14.06.2013 14:34, Peter Khramov:

Alex, note that some of your old pictures (such as this) in the gallery already, they were loaded en masse from Flick. Accordingly, ship them again is not necessary: ​​-)

14.06.2013 14:30, Peter Khramov:

A determination was not there when you are writing comments, Alexander?

14.06.2013 14:29, Peter Khramov:

Ataman will.

14.06.2013 14:29, Peter Khramov:

Bad! It is necessary to qualify!

14.06.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with pictures of adults from the same individual.

14.06.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with pictures of adults from the same individual.

14.06.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with pictures of adults from the same individual.

14.06.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with pictures of adults from the same individual.

14.06.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with pictures of adults from the same individual.

14.06.2013 14:27, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

14.06.2013 14:27, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

14.06.2013 11:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pseudopanthera macularia

14.06.2013 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena dispar

14.06.2013 11:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena dispar

14.06.2013 11:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eumedonia eumedon

14.06.2013 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eumedonia eumedon

14.06.2013 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sorry, here it is under this name :)))Eumedonia eumedon

14.06.2013 11:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aricia eumedon

14.06.2013 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Myelois circumvoluta:)))

14.06.2013 11:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Myelois circumvoluta:)))

14.06.2013 9:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, no one is not particularly claims

14.06.2013 8:52, Shamil Murtazin:

Fortress =)

14.06.2013 0:00, Irina Nikulina:

Clearly, Peter, thank you) is not checked, hoped that the rise in neopredelёnnye- but Alexander quickly enough found a blooper)

13.06.2013 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Irina if Fota loaded the wrong way, then a photographer for an hour have an opportunity to send Fautua to another species in the Personal Area. So sign the file names do not be afraid, just check if needed, and all.

13.06.2013 20:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is an easy case, Perth, will come to fix :)

13.06.2013 20:15, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you so much corrected, Alexander. She's gone to the exact name of the file (already to promise to sign the files when there somneniya- as they were) not had time to put the question.

13.06.2013 20:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes. It Ancylis, but to determine the type of photo ...

13.06.2013 19:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Whoops! I did not notice that? to the exact same as the previously determined angle is normal :)

13.06.2013 19:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Archips podana, female.

13.06.2013 19:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

I must disappoint you, Irina, is a butterfly from another family. :(
Family Pyralidae viewsMyelois circumvoluta

13.06.2013 19:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely not, this "friend" of a kind likely Pandemis, but certainly not Archips.

13.06.2013 19:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

You'll laugh, but neither of which is not similar. You can spuat perhaps with a female Archips rosana, but it has a lighter image, and there is no shade on the outside of the upper wings.

13.06.2013 18:39, Shamil Murtazin:

This patient is not the same?
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22383

13.06.2013 18:27, Shamil Murtazin:

On what grounds was determined? (make detailed images)
For in the "local" photos color scheme is very different.

13.06.2013 18:26, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you for your determination.
The desire to share the joy overcame :)
What

13.06.2013 17:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Archips podana, female. Cook is not necessary.
Angle try to choose a better :)))

13.06.2013 9:00, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hebomoia glaucippe aturia ???

13.06.2013 8:45, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Episteme maculatrix ???

13.06.2013 1:07, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

13.06.2013 1:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.06.2013 1:06, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

13.06.2013 1:05, Peter Khramov:

Chotko transferred to the females.

13.06.2013 1:05, Peter Khramov:

Ugums made.

13.06.2013 1:04, Peter Khramov:

Modernizing scare kids!

13.06.2013 1:04, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

13.06.2013 1:04, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with the neighboring fotami.

13.06.2013 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.06.2013 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.06.2013 1:02, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with another photo from the same individual.

13.06.2013 1:02, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

13.06.2013 1:01, Peter Khramov:

Ah, here's the details would have ... However, if the author is not identified, then there uzho and probably little chance.

13.06.2013 1:00, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

13.06.2013 1:00, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

13.06.2013 0:41, Irina Nikulina:

Nymphalis xanthomelas

12.06.2013 17:37, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Lasiommata maera?

12.06.2013 17:27, Shamil Murtazin:

That is the only cook? =)

11.06.2013 19:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

She is the (Lexias dirtea). Apparently, not all species of rare :)

11.06.2013 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

11.06.2013 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.06.2013 12:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Parantica sita Kollar

11.06.2013 9:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Macrochilo cribrumalis

11.06.2013 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maria, why it is not safe to properly define. :)

11.06.2013 1:00, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.06.2013 1:00, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.06.2013 0:52, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

11.06.2013 0:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

adippe

10.06.2013 13:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why look like? it is.
:)

10.06.2013 13:16, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

veerokrylku on something like

10.06.2013 13:15, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

Moth can be ruled

10.06.2013 13:11, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

similar to Icarus

10.06.2013 12:06, Igor Sakhno:

Boloria selene?

10.06.2013 1:57, Irina Nikulina:

Basil, unfortunately, there are 2 photos, but I can say- yellow color was not.

09.06.2013 23:38, Masha Gill:

Dichrorampha acuminatana?

09.06.2013 23:17, Masha Gill:

Determination on molbiol: Eucosma metzneriana

09.06.2013 23:17, Masha Gill:

Determination on molbiol: Eucosma metzneriana

09.06.2013 23:10, Masha Gill:

Elachista argentella?

09.06.2013 22:53, Masha Gill:

Teleiopsis diffinis?

09.06.2013 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, tell me what the thread of morphine, as well?

09.06.2013 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Eugene, thanks for the clarification.

09.06.2013 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Good sitting ...

09.06.2013 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Eh ...

09.06.2013 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I stand yet)

09.06.2013 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Pandemis chtol what? ..

09.06.2013 14:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

09.06.2013 14:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

09.06.2013 14:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

09.06.2013 14:54, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

09.06.2013 0:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Scolitantides orion

09.06.2013 0:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Scolitantides orion

09.06.2013 0:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Siona lineata

09.06.2013 0:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Siona lineata

08.06.2013 22:51, Aleksey Gnilenkov:

I'm afraid they define. How not to "define" so be sure to miss ... Not the first and last name ... Look at the 35 photos posted similar people and called them different. And I can not find a difference - they are exactly the same for me ... I'm in this dark matter.

08.06.2013 21:14, Shamil Murtazin:

A better perspective is no excuse.

08.06.2013 20:00, Shamil Murtazin:

Ochepyatka ...
Chrysalis

08.06.2013 19:40, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you. Pour =)

08.06.2013 19:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Gusyanka stopped eating and died.

08.06.2013 19:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Gusyanka stopped eating and died.

08.06.2013 19:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Gusyanka stopped eating and died.

08.06.2013 19:12, Peter Khramov:

Alex, what kind did not put? Well I'm sure you know that ... Aporia Crataegi

08.06.2013 6:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Angle the top there? If bryuschko no yellow (white) she is.

08.06.2013 5:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

08.06.2013 5:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2013 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And what can I say? Eugene right and I lopuhnulsya ..... tolerated, what can we do about it :)

07.06.2013 21:04, Maxim Schwarz: This species is identified correctly.

07.06.2013 20:47, Elena Tikhonova:

Lentochnik poplar?

07.06.2013 19:45, Alex Dumchus:

I do not think, even though they all messed up, as well as with violacea - someone considers a separate species, like on our website, one subspecies helenok - disassemble itself. Here is the site: http://stembol.com/morphidae/morpho/family_morphidae.htm
Group deidamia
Morpho_deidamia_erica
deidamia (Surinam, Bolivia, Amazon)
Morpho_deidamia_neoptolomous
neoptolemus (Peru)
Morpho_deidamia_erica electra
thermione
briseis
Group granadensis
granadensis (Nicaragua - Ecuador, Colombia)
lycanor (Salidero, Ecuador)

07.06.2013 18:38, Peter Khramov:

The underside transferred to Aporia Crataegi.

07.06.2013 16:14, Peter Khramov:

What rastsvetochka ...

07.06.2013 16:14, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

07.06.2013 16:13, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

07.06.2013 16:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Leucomelas juvenilis

07.06.2013 15:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Now, I agree. The strip does not matter. Reason: In the subfamily Erebinae-tribe Catocalini (which previously was subfamily) there is only one kind of Leucomela and probably only one kind juvenilis.
In any case, among the scoop lentochnits anything similar is not present.
So what can be safely transferred to a Leucomelas juvenilis

07.06.2013 14:21, Irina Nikulina:

Clearly, Ure. "With age, the" fringe obtrёpyvaetsya-'s bar disappears. I have 4 pictures of this butterfly is very "old", already without bahromy- and soootvetstvenno- without stripes. I did not put an old lady)

07.06.2013 14:10, Peter Khramov:

Morpho deidamia granadensis synonym?

07.06.2013 12:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, we are talking about the strip with the colors that I had never seen in their pictures. Perhaps he once was, and then disappeared with age? .but And this mystery is unknown to me

07.06.2013 12:31, Irina Nikulina:

It was possible, Eugene - thank you very much! I, frankly, too embarrassing lack of rounded vertex spot, but before you put the photos, reviewed available) and just this one picture http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/20707 (there still was not your commentary about rapae) dispelled my doubts) I decided that zakruglёnnost- diagnostich not mandatory. sign)

07.06.2013 12:14, Irina Nikulina:

If I understood correctly, we are talking about the strip on the fringe, the pictures she really present (for example, here http://macroid.ru/showgallery.php?cat=68619), and you have one of the two pictures she posed here like there (and at the other a fringe have no- 7946). Or are you just confused her blue-violet shade?

07.06.2013 4:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Evgeny, thanks! At least the thing started moving. I'll try to ask local experts here, just matter of time. If there be something cleared up, I'll add the info.

07.06.2013 3:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Dunno. :) Melete/dulcinea dilemma always puzzled me. :) I'm not a pro in Far East and, bluntly speaking, now have no time to dip into these nuances. Later maybe. Clearly evident only this is not brassicae.

07.06.2013 3:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Irina, here are my thoughts: 1) in brassicae dark spot at the top of the front wing is clearly semicircular on the inside. See, for example, http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3784; 2) of the same color svrehu pretty rich black spots; Here we see (the edge of the wing sticking) gray; 3) a little different form the wings and, in general, the overall impression.:) Often somehow immediately clear that in view, and not so easy to formulate - and for some, in fact, featured? :) In this case, it seems to be possible.

07.06.2013 3:12, Yuri Semejkin:

06.06.2013, Evgeny Karolinsky:
dulcinea/melete

Agree. One of these two.
Evgeny! Let's try to clear this up. Basing on the identification guide.
1. Pieris dulcinea Butl. Looking at the ID guide, we can say that dulcinea has specific dark dust around veins which (dust) can be as wide as narrow, often narrowing to the margin. Let's not rely on spots which can be as well absent. Seems like fits dulcinea, just one con: that very yellow spot at its wing apex. The ID guide says nothing about that spot. Now dulcinea is out whilst on this website butterflies with such spot do belong to dulcinea species.
2. Now let's check P melete/
What's common? This one as well as dulcinea can have no black spots on its underside. Venation seems mainly the same.
Distinctions: there is nothing about fringe around veins on its underside (as opposite to dulcinea). Turns out that P. melete has no such fringe?
Secondly, it's said to have orange or yellow spot at its wing apex (whilst dulcinea is not described as having such a spot).
If this yellow (orange) spot is specific in P. melete, there is an immediate question. Can this spot be a key to reject P. dulcinea right away (sure if dulcinea undoubtedly has no any of the kind)?
In whole, I still lean to P. melete. Yet if compare descriptions of these two species, there is something in-between. Neither this, nor that.

07.06.2013 1:26, Yuri Semejkin:

06.06.2013 18:57, Petr Khramov:

And at exactly it with such conductors?
Yes

07.06.2013 0:41, Yuri Semejkin:

I know. Such a phrase in his time came from matte through my pictures.
I am confused on the rear wings at the bottom (such as it is called back corner) the presence of dark blue with a purple tinge narrow band (between white). Therefore, I put the question. No one my picture is not a strip, and the little things sometimes distinguish species.

07.06.2013 0:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes, it's underside

07.06.2013 0:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Aporia crataegi L

07.06.2013 0:08, Maxim Schwarz:

In my opinion it is all the same underside, not the top of the wings. And like a butterfly Aporia crataegi

06.06.2013 23:23, Peter Khramov:

To get tired banner - it can be easily removed. To do this, check the box "Do not show the banner Entomological store Lepstore the top of the page" in the Personal Area in Settings. It goes without saying, it needs to be a registered user modeling.
This is relevant boutiques - enter your login / password on the Lepidoptera.Shop, we can say, my dear, so that users will Lepidoptera.ru snacks / bonuses / gifts.

06.06.2013 22:49, Irina Nikulina:

Here she Leucomelas juvenilis

06.06.2013 22:35, Irina Nikulina:

He's) Sorry, missed)

06.06.2013 22:31, Irina Nikulina:

I wondered immediately after the statement, but the objection was waiting spec-s. I think it melete.
Very characteristic orange stain at the root of HCC.

06.06.2013 22:26, Irina Nikulina:

My output is so quiet ...), like nespets-a) It would be grateful to Evgeny for the considerations expressed here in this photo. On what grounds he confidently identified. I have it for many years considered the cabbage), signed a photo for a long time, right after the shooting.Considerations - Butterfly rather large (even in comparison with non-small flower red clover can be seen), and dark picture elements were sufficiently developed, and contrast, as the shine off the corner. Eugene, correct, please, what is wrong?

06.06.2013 22:17, Eugene Karolinskiy:

dulcinea / melete

06.06.2013 21:34, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, he cleaned up. Nothing better to screw up doing than anything and in any way: -)
ZY Recently, I go somewhere Mota, butterflies and if somewhere and saw the Zoological Museum in St. Petersburg only. Hehe.

06.06.2013 19:02, Peter Khramov:

Igor, thanks for the tip. Let's see how to fix this thing ...

06.06.2013 19:02, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

06.06.2013 19:01, Peter Khramov:

The Swallowtail.

06.06.2013 19:01, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

06.06.2013 19:00, Peter Khramov:

Ugums, suffered.

06.06.2013 19:00, Peter Khramov:

Knight Samurai.

06.06.2013 18:59, Peter Khramov:

He has made a clarification on the floor.

06.06.2013 18:59, Peter Khramov:

He has made a clarification on the floor.

06.06.2013 18:59, Peter Khramov:

He has made a clarification on the floor.

06.06.2013 18:58, Peter Khramov:

Ok, male.

06.06.2013 18:58, Peter Khramov:

Ltd. Basil, say something such loud)

06.06.2013 18:57, Peter Khramov:

Irina, your output)

06.06.2013 18:57, Peter Khramov:

And at exactly it with such conductors?

06.06.2013 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Ah, the circle of deception. I stand to Boudinotiana notha.

06.06.2013 18:55, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

06.06.2013 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the view is good. The head of what, uh.

06.06.2013 18:53, Peter Khramov:

Even uzho and do not know when to reach the hands of the editing of the classifier by color. List of planned brainteasers crawls somewhere behind the wall: -)

06.06.2013 18:52, Peter Khramov:

Can. In the absence of a stamp, Shamil, pour quite a simple comme il faut)) so that the ship does not hesitate.

06.06.2013 18:51, Peter Khramov:

There are no good without a blessing!

06.06.2013 18:50, Peter Khramov:

Large striped.

06.06.2013 18:49, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

06.06.2013 18:49, Peter Khramov:

It took into accurate.

06.06.2013 18:49, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

06.06.2013 18:48, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with the photo # 22161.

06.06.2013 18:48, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with the photo # 22161.

06.06.2013 18:48, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

06.06.2013 18:47, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

06.06.2013 18:46, Peter Khramov:

Irina, a male or a male?

06.06.2013 17:13, Peter Khramov:

The author was to determine, not just to pick up a fote. Moved.

06.06.2013 16:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Euclidia juvenilis?

06.06.2013 16:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Euclidia juvenilis?

06.06.2013 15:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Driopa stubbendorfii Men

06.06.2013 10:44, Peter Khramov:

And the citizens?

06.06.2013 10:42, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

06.06.2013 10:42, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

06.06.2013 2:30, Eugene Karolinskiy:

:) So, this year they also have. I wonder what part of Forest Park? I was in the area today Pyatihatok and "monsters" is not met. :)

06.06.2013 0:11, Irina Nikulina:

Diaphora mendica (Clerck, 1759), the female?

06.06.2013 0:10, Irina Nikulina:

Diaphora mendica (Clerck, 1759)?

05.06.2013 23:38, Irina Nikulina:

Limenitis camilla

05.06.2013 23:34, Irina Nikulina:

Araschnia levana, summer form

05.06.2013 22:26, Igor Sakhno:

I saw where the mistake. When I start "to offer a snapshot of a butterfly", there pops up a ready-made her name. So in this title it is necessary to remove the gap between "C" and "album", and put a hyphen in between. Then everything goes to the right place. Without this hyphen goes undefined.

05.06.2013 10:49, Irina Nikulina:

Igor, thanks, that's interesting indeed! Have you ever tried to take a video of this "move" (if camera has macro function)?

03.06.2013 23:10, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Fedor!

03.06.2013 22:33, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Xanthorhoe montanata (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775)

03.06.2013 18:09, Alex Dumchus:

Eugene. I have a lot of Sarpedon from southeast Asia, including and caught me, mb of them lost and Milo. Please, can you explain where these spots are, at the edge or anywhere else? Because it is in the image of different sites that are not visible.

03.06.2013 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2013 16:40, Irina Nikulina:

Thera variata (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775)?

03.06.2013 13:44, Viktor Kolesnikov: This species is identified correctly.

02.06.2013 23:20, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

02.06.2013 23:11, Irina Nikulina:

Olethreutes arcuella (Clerck, 1759), perhaps? (confused shooting location)

02.06.2013 21:23, Yuri Semejkin:

I threw what I was given.
Regarding synonym Spilosoma supposedly offered me (But I did not offer). Vasily, do not hang up on me, "other dogs." You are well aware of whose zayavlenie.Prichёm is stated twice - in two pictures. And if you have forgotten, look at the bottom of the chronology of the May 24, 2013 Time 23:45 and above. It is perfectly visible.After all, is not it? Someone here said that Spilosoma, is a synonym.
Basil's write Alexander, find out from him. And then one offers the other denies, yet extreme somehow I.
Why do I write, it's not me.

02.06.2013 20:07, Masha Gill:

Calamotropha paludella?

02.06.2013 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here, as the same, there are two kinds of photos uploaded in 2009 by me as Spilosoma (see. The original file name), and initially it is precisely as Chionarctia: no objection on my part has not been and will not be
. And then divorced .....

02.06.2013 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Anywhere, I do not climb. And just to cite their arguments on the issue of inadmissibility is a synonym Spilosoma. By the way it is offered you, Yuri. Although there are online sources from which such information is taken.

02.06.2013 9:13, Yuri Semejkin:

In general, Vasily. Why do you answer for Alexander?. He signed it is a synonym. With his "cheese -Bor" began. Here let himself intelligible answer. It is better in a personal, not to fence the garden again

02.06.2013 8:51, Yuri Semejkin:

It is not a question to me

02.06.2013 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, and VV Dubatolov She did Chionarctia nivea (Menetries, 1859) but without synonyms. And the city with those words Kononenko VS not see the point.

02.06.2013 5:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

On funet.fi that the same situation: http://ftp.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/arctiinae/chionarctia/index.html#niveus
Synonym Spilosoma have kind Chionarctia purum (Leech, 1899) but does not have Chionarctia niveus / nivea (Ménétriés, 1859)

02.06.2013 5:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By Sinev in kind Spilosoma Curtis, 1825 on the territory of Russia, and 4 types of nivea among them not. But there Chionarctia nivea (Menetries, 1958). Let's leave, and so we will not keep empty talk.

02.06.2013 1:07, Yuri Semejkin:

In this case, the question to Alexander. Where did you get that is synonymous?
05.24.2013 11:42 Alexander Zhakov:

All right, this is another synonym.


05.23.2013 23:45 Yuri Semeykin:

Kononenko VS BPI FEB RAS. Defined as Spilosoma niveum

01.06.2013 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No one will not do this in my opinion. I, personally, this generic synonym she did not know. Here and there she Spilosma, but that is no reason to come up with a synonym.

01.06.2013 12:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Someone from modders can still add the synonym-Spilosoma niveum. To prodobnaya situation of this kind are no longer created.

01.06.2013 9:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male. As is clearly seen mustache :)

01.06.2013 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

01.06.2013 9:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

01.06.2013 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

01.06.2013 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.06.2013 1:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Butterflies are small, 4-5 mm long. Remove the larger has not yet been

01.06.2013 1:41, Peter Khramov:

I am also in favor. Ie leave exif, of course, is not necessary. But some data from it, and to the characteristics of vytsapyvat photo prilyapyvat. How true, I will have to do. Just the point must be willing ...

31.05.2013 23:30, Eugene Karolinskiy:

1

31.05.2013 23:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

rapae

31.05.2013 23:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

rapae

31.05.2013 21:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Keep!

31.05.2013 16:11, Sergei Kotov:

And actually in the photo Archiearis notha (Hubner, 1803)!

31.05.2013 11:51, Shamil Murtazin:

Good day to you!
The issue of such a plan. I would like to fill in the on site EXIF ​​remained in the photos. Sometimes it is useful to see who does what and how to remove.
Plus, the new cameras can pull out the coordinates of the shooting.

30.05.2013 22:05, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

30.05.2013 21:56, Shamil Murtazin:

http://molbiol.ru/forums/uploads/post-670068-1369121871.jpg
all confused.
Both angles it is this same track. =)

30.05.2013 21:49, Shamil Murtazin:

And the first time I see it is this arrangement.
It looks like a carrier-based fighter in the assembled state =)

30.05.2013 21:08, Irina Nikulina:

Thymelicus lineola?

30.05.2013 19:51, Irina Nikulina:

Pose, in my opinion, is very typical - in this perspective .. And a wingspan of 24-28mm in this species.

30.05.2013 18:32, Shamil Murtazin:

Almost guess =)
Enjoying your search ...
Yeah, Argynnis paphia no yellow flowers.
I was looking for a pair of orange-yellow.

30.05.2013 18:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Argynnis paphia, male.

30.05.2013 18:05, Shamil Murtazin:

I'll try using poopredelyat remarkable classifier =)
Argynnis laodice?

30.05.2013 17:43, Shamil Murtazin:

Interesting pose rest =)
And what is the size of the wing? ..

30.05.2013 17:38, Shamil Murtazin:

Thank you for the comment!
It is already in the "cage". In nature, until such fine has not learned to take pictures normally.
Photos previous erased poorly received, but other materials I have.
You can see it: http://molbiol.ru/forums/uploads/post-670068-1369121871.jpg
2. There is a double room photo

30.05.2013 17:28, Shamil Murtazin:

Previous photo somewhere touched. There were only a small resolution. Home pour not comme il faut =)
I do not know whether you can then post links to other resources. If that - delete.
http://molbiol.ru/forums/uploads/post-670068-1369918875.jpg
She also weaves a shelter (hiding constantly)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qoz9Y72fmRs

30.05.2013 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I change the color of either impressed riders, flies, tahini, etc. And maybe I pupate met: in this case I recommend to carefully collect and post-butterfly caterpillar then likely be determined. Just wondering....

28.05.2013 22:28, Shamil Murtazin:

But at less than the number of photos village :)

28.05.2013 22:23, Shamil Murtazin:

By the way, gusyanka was green, and then here's some red-brown has become ...

28.05.2013 15:20, Peter Khramov:

Well, klyatyh. See what krasava.

28.05.2013 15:20, Peter Khramov:

So be accurate male.

28.05.2013 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Oh, and since there was hope!

28.05.2013 10:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Angerona prunaria?

28.05.2013 10:39, Shamil Murtazin:

Angerona prunaria?

28.05.2013 10:12, Shamil Murtazin:

Angerona prunaria?

28.05.2013 10:01, Shamil Murtazin:

What an interesting kukloka =)

28.05.2013 6:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, from a long stay here, it will not be A. caja :)
Endure it quickly.

28.05.2013 1:45, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

28.05.2013 1:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mistakes another, it is notHyles euphorbiae, itHyles gallii100% :)

27.05.2013 21:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

27.05.2013 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Buck

27.05.2013 18:36, Maxim Schwarz:

Thank you! :)

27.05.2013 17:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Without specialists - from Sarpedon and Milo clear differences in the shape and width of blue spots on the hind wings!

27.05.2013 16:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina law: itEpicallia villicaIt is necessary to move.

27.05.2013 16:29, Irina Nikulina:

Epicallia villica Linnaeus, 1758

27.05.2013 13:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So Aporia Crataegi klyatyhAporia crataegi

27.05.2013 13:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

27.05.2013 6:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.05.2013 2:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

argus

25.05.2013 21:14, Evgeny Komarov:

I screwed up as I could. There http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/14171 distributing take away "south of the Lower Volga region (Dosang)."

25.05.2013 16:24, Evgeny Komarov:

And here twice has registered information http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7473

25.05.2013 15:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.05.2013 15:56, Sergei Kotov:

Cupido minimus (Fuessly, 1775)

25.05.2013 15:56, Sergei Kotov:

Cupido minimus (Fuessly, 1775)

25.05.2013 15:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.05.2013 15:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Qualitative and other points - do not remove! I agree with the proposal. Well, from 20-30 (for example) images of one type of region (or anywhere else), still leaving a dozen of the best.

25.05.2013 15:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Get married here please http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120400 distributing "dwarf shrubs and" delete!

25.05.2013 13:50, Alex Dumchus:

Here like everything is clear - to drag Swallowtail! But what's the difference Graphium sarpedon Gr.milon- from me I do not understand. Maybe specialists prompt ???

25.05.2013 12:48, Igor Sakhno:

The male seems.

25.05.2013 11:31, Alex Dumchus:

Vasily rights. Just some sites sometimes omit the name of the species and subspecies once allowed. This is especially true Morfidov and papillomas. I met M.luna, M. phanodemus, P.stockleyi and others.

25.05.2013 10:13, Evgeny Komarov:

OK!

25.05.2013 10:05, Igor Sakhno:

Cupido minimus (Fuessly, 1775) allegedly

25.05.2013 10:04, Igor Sakhno:

Presumably Cupido minimus (Fuessly, 1775)

24.05.2013 21:42, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

24.05.2013 21:41, Peter Khramov:

The accurate.

24.05.2013 21:33, Shamil Murtazin:

Such a proposal based on the experience of the use of Google Earth, for example. If you turn on the layer with the photo (Panoramio), it turns porridge points. I do not like the show very much. Not comfortable.
Sour sweet can be combined in the context of your own ideas. Well-known areas contain a basic image type; outside the area - look like dots on the map.Single copies can be switched off - optional.
Here's a version of mozgoshturma left =)

24.05.2013 21:25, Peter Khramov:

Fota left for the edification of posterity.

24.05.2013 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Opinions will or will not?

24.05.2013 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, can you please say anything solid?..

24.05.2013 20:49, Peter Khramov:

Lord, the system is as follows: if a species or other taxon site there (or is there only as a synonym), it is necessary to pour from the ground, and then I can remove obsolete synonym. BUT. If the species or other taxa in some form on the site already exists (not as a synonym) and not there hangs or incorrectly written - then just let me know and I will correct.Accordingly, Eugene, in your case, then the species is listed with the source, and I will bear synonym.

24.05.2013 20:41, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, thank you for the transfer.

24.05.2013 20:40, Peter Khramov:

He moved to the form yet.

24.05.2013 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to exact analogy with the neighboring fotoy.

24.05.2013 20:38, Peter Khramov:

Sorry, May bed. Fiksed.

24.05.2013 20:32, Peter Khramov:

This is not the point. This is the habitats on the map. Accordingly, in the same blue stain it is done ... But yes, you can try as the thread with a soft combine sour. The second stage now, however, more in the first process.

24.05.2013 17:07, Shamil Murtazin:

You can try to somehow be divided into areas of ... Slozhnovato true, but in principle it is possible =)
Immediately it will be seen that in general in this area can be seen / expected.

24.05.2013 17:01, Shamil Murtazin:

Defined as - Cameraria ohridella, but the picture is still uncertain in a folder (type not specified). = (

24.05.2013 14:50, Peter Khramov:

Why neprichem? Och and even. In Nyago and spelled: No N. janthina in Moscow, no!

24.05.2013 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Well, Alexander, forgive us sinners hristaradi! Have mercy on his, kindly speak for: -)

24.05.2013 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Thus here briefly but succinctly ...

24.05.2013 12:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander. I have nothing protiv.Skinul because clarify, because In the description of the missing synonym. Although some butterflies list of synonyms can be seen longer. Here only three synonym.

24.05.2013 12:06, Yuri Semejkin:

In principle, this and # 13786, and can be deleted, since there is almost like better pictures from one place

24.05.2013 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spilosoma niveum synonymChionarctia nivea

24.05.2013 11:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

All right, this is another synonym.

24.05.2013 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

alceae

23.05.2013 23:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Kononenko VS BPI FEB RAS. Defined as Spilosoma niveum

23.05.2013 18:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! That infa - endure Drasteria christophi of synonyms (Drasteria rada (Boisduval, 1848) = Euclidia roda Herrich-Schäffer, [1851] = Ophiusa rada Eversmann, 1857 = altivaga (Alphéraky, 1893) = Leucanitis christophi Alphéraky, 1895) to Drasteria rada an independent view! Or in this case, it is necessary to bring? See. My comments to the form.

23.05.2013 8:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Define: Belyaev EA BPI FEB RAS

22.05.2013 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Prepona omphale one of the synonyms Prepona laertes

22.05.2013 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not like it at European Catocala nupta, WA on many species of this genus do not want to define, and then get into the debate on the correctness of the definition. :)

22.05.2013 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Panemeria tenebrata,
? - It was a comma in the Eng. clave

22.05.2013 17:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Panemeria tenebrata?
Sinev is not being. :)

21.05.2013 18:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Kononenko VS I defined as Spilosoma niveum

21.05.2013 0:13, Irina Nikulina:

http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=193914&st=50 here is the link

21.05.2013 0:12, Irina Nikulina:

For future discussions - here are discussed in some detail Far perlamutrovok views and there are some conclusions of niobium, ASIT, adippe, nerippe (post Pavel Gorbunov (PG18) from 13.06.2008), but need a special look-a. Only nerippoy more or less clear) - "well-made hearts on the edge of the wing," will not make a mistake ... and the rest of his head broke ...but also a vorax with coredippe available. In general, looking forward to the end of the "fields")

20.05.2013 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Perens to Argus and comments posted by foty 5754 here that it was clear from the feet up. And 5754 is removed.

20.05.2013 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

Well, maybe, though occasionally will glance), well, so net-after fields of torment)) has collected a lot of questions. In the meantime, and fans, too, will stroll through the fields)

20.05.2013 23:37, Peter Khramov:

I'm sorry, corrected.

20.05.2013 23:29, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, trying to deal with the Argus-IDASA, stumbled upon a double http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5754. Apparently, all the Argus?

20.05.2013 23:25, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, a long time hanging in undefined. Do you have questions or just hand never reached?

20.05.2013 22:50, Peter Khramov:

Spec. certainly say that until October, they say, in the fields! Around the same haughty expression, as artists say, we say, in rehearsal, and athletes - in training!

20.05.2013 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Judging from the blue, it does not seem ...

20.05.2013 22:48, Peter Khramov:

He opened the discus.

20.05.2013 22:48, Peter Khramov:

He opened the discus.

20.05.2013 22:47, Peter Khramov:

I submitted to the form.

20.05.2013 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Definitely!

20.05.2013 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Due to the fact that soon will be binding on truck to points on the map, there is the following idea: do not delete foty, even if they are similar to the existing ones, if their place is markedly different from the others on the map.But such "extra" shots can be hidden on the description page of the form, or even in the main gallery under a separate link "Show advanced foty." Ie by default does not show, but who wants to - can always see them in the gallery and on the page of the form, clicking on a link.
What do you think?

20.05.2013 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Ok, again except for access restrictions is no other requests, the work of the Project run.

20.05.2013 18:46, Irina Nikulina:

Igor, that I hesitated just between the two, so the question left) bow to idasu- underside darker blue scales and spraying at the root dimmer, other clear differences not know (no top) .. This is expect that special. say).

20.05.2013 17:19, Alex Dumchus:

Myscelia cyaniris

20.05.2013 14:46, Igor Sakhno:

Or he or IDASA.

20.05.2013 14:36, Igor Sakhno:

It would not (Noctua janthina Esp.). Maybe she and Moscow have?

18.05.2013 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Definitely not.

16.05.2013 17:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Catocala nupta (Linnaeus, 1767)?

15.05.2013 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think it is reasonable to availability points to registered users only. For just enough commentary viewing date and geography as it was before.

15.05.2013 7:59, Yuri Semejkin:

opportunity to do so, so as not to show up all the points to anyone who wishes, and some were only visible to the author or the limited number of users.
Reasonable, only to rare and (or) the endangered species.

14.05.2013 20:14, Irina Nikulina:

Argynnis nerippe Felder et Felder, 1862?

14.05.2013 20:08, Irina Nikulina:

Argynnis xipe Grum-Grshimailo, 1891? Argynnis aglaja?

14.05.2013 13:01, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with other pictures of the same individual.

14.05.2013 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Any move!

14.05.2013 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Rather, I see. Indeed, by the names of the files it is sent directly to the appropriate view, there is such a feature.

14.05.2013 12:59, Peter Khramov:

Who makes the system so that you can put a point on Google Maps within the site Lepidoptera.ru and bind to this point your pictures, place of catching butterflies, as well as any comments. Then you can watch points for individual photos / species, and a large crowd on the map - where someone saw something, photographed or caught.Stuck for a new site, although it was discussed several times before. Question to all: a more functional cards or what features already mentioned, would you like to see? For example, the opportunity to do so, so as not to show up all the points to anyone who wishes, and some were only visible to the author or the limited number of users. Or something else ...

14.05.2013 8:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Move to Hypomecis roboraria

14.05.2013 1:23, Irina Nikulina:

The very surprised Peter) I'm kind of a photo is not scored, leaving uncertain in any case, to confirm, still a rare species (although minimal doubt) ... And suddenly it went straight to the view, apparently, the name of the file in the folder )

14.05.2013 0:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.05.2013 0:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.05.2013 0:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.05.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov:

Minutata!

14.05.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov:

Irene, as it already seems to be related to. Or something I do not ... Ponil

14.05.2013 0:05, Peter Khramov:

That would be the summer, go to the country ... (c)

14.05.2013 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Ivan, the data put down in geography ...

13.05.2013 23:42, Irina Nikulina:

Plebejus argus?

13.05.2013 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Camptogramma bilineata

13.05.2013 23:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lithostege griseata

13.05.2013 23:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lithostege griseata

13.05.2013 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lamoria anella

13.05.2013 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lamoria anella

13.05.2013 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lamoria anella

13.05.2013 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lamoria anella

13.05.2013 21:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Autographa gamma

13.05.2013 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eublemma minutata

13.05.2013 21:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agrotis exclamationis

13.05.2013 13:23, Irina Nikulina:

Clossiana iphigenia (Graeser, 1888)

13.05.2013 9:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona female

13.05.2013 9:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona female.

13.05.2013 9:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona female.

13.05.2013 9:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No. Will not. I will be at his dacha in the Bor district.

12.05.2013 20:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ivan, butterflies all Volgograd? Then almost all determined.

11.05.2013 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

no date and place, let it beConistra vaccinii, but this is not accurate.

11.05.2013 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, not Orthosia incerta, and that now you look.

08.05.2013 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And to shoot the collection material still recommend to buy a small shtativchik and take the self-timer in macro mode. And with the light sensitive poshamanil.

08.05.2013 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It ought to drag Swallowtail. Or even what opinions will be? Just wondering.

08.05.2013 14:08, Peter Khramov:

In females. Dim, in case you did not desert bush at the end of May?

08.05.2013 14:08, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

08.05.2013 14:07, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by analogy with another photo from the same individual.

08.05.2013 14:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.05.2013 14:07, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

08.05.2013 14:07, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

08.05.2013 14:06, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

08.05.2013 14:06, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

08.05.2013 14:06, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

08.05.2013 14:06, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

08.05.2013 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Ugums. MOVED by analogy with the neighboring fotoy.

08.05.2013 14:03, Peter Khramov:

About how. No radial you!

08.05.2013 13:59, Peter Khramov:

Canon PowerShot A450.
By author: try to change the metering center-weighted or spot metering. If there is a possibility of manual settings - change the shutter speed to a shorter (about 1/125 the thread, if it has a flash sync), if it is just a bit dark - set exposure compensation for flash 1.5. ISO slide 250 to 100 or even 80.Well, check with the focus - where the autofocus misses ...

08.05.2013 13:30, Sergei Kotov:

Earophila badiata

08.05.2013 13:30, Sergei Kotov:

Earophila badiata

08.05.2013 11:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Earophila badiata

08.05.2013 5:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And most likely like this: Papilio machaon aliaska Scudder, 1869
http://butterfliesofamerica.com/papilio_machaon_aliaska.htm

08.05.2013 1:47, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula floslactata?

07.05.2013 19:49, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

07.05.2013 18:10, Alex Dumchus:

Kallima rumia

07.05.2013 17:57, Alex Dumchus:

On the label was written Papilio aliaska. Yes, it is similar to P.zelicaon and even P. polyxenes, but the first difference that strikes the eye - is the lack of black spots on the lower wings red eyes.

07.05.2013 17:43, Alex Dumchus:

Morpho granadensis

07.05.2013 17:29, Irina Nikulina:

Female - left samets- right. Nizhniy slip can be removed, Peter.

07.05.2013 17:28, Irina Nikulina:

Female - right samets- left.

07.05.2013 16:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Gluck. It was uncertain species, although well defined.

07.05.2013 16:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pyrrhia umbra (Hufnagel, 1766)

07.05.2013 16:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Orthosia incerta (Hufnagel, 1766) ???

07.05.2013 16:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where? When? Hypena rostralis (Linnaeus, 1758)

07.05.2013 16:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No doubt it is.

07.05.2013 11:45, Alex Dumchus:

Surely this C.pomona.Ona much smaller than ekz.21911. Besides other colors and there are no points in the central part of the wing.

07.05.2013 10:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypomecis roboraria must be corrected

07.05.2013 10:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female

07.05.2013 10:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia iphita

07.05.2013 10:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pieris canidia female

07.05.2013 10:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona female

07.05.2013 10:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona male

07.05.2013 10:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona male

07.05.2013 10:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona female

07.05.2013 10:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona female

07.05.2013 10:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea mulciber female

07.05.2013 10:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

bilateral.

07.05.2013 5:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Share a secret, plz. What the camera manages to shoot well? Racking their brains ..........

06.05.2013 22:58, Igor Sakhno:

Deltote bankiana

06.05.2013 18:09, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

I do not blame me that such nonsense to the site spread

06.05.2013 17:05, Peter Khramov:

It contains x geography around the image. In general, it is fairly well-known Varant when the wings difference ...

06.05.2013 16:40, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

where you caught it, or where to see it?

06.05.2013 16:36, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

then why the scales are bright, because of the climate?

06.05.2013 16:32, Peter Khramov:

It is not a variance, but the fact that they are long-lived, and including winter ...

06.05.2013 16:32, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

i.e. flake

06.05.2013 16:31, Vasiliy Evdokimov: This species is identified correctly.

06.05.2013 16:31, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

I certainly will not argue, but the catch is that this is now a white edging, it is pollen, I checked. can kakoy- some kind of variability?

06.05.2013 10:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also gonepteryx have no one. Final verdict: highly tattered male Gonepteryx rhamni.
Namesake, a small note: very warps from office pins. I advise you to still use tattoos for entomology. Meanwhile, a parallel to the site of Peter entomological work shop: http://lepstore.ru/

06.05.2013 10:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.05.2013 20:34, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

05.05.2013 20:34, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

05.05.2013 20:34, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

05.05.2013 20:33, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

05.05.2013 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Basil is gonepteryx, to see life.

05.05.2013 20:01, Alex Dumchus:

Can Satopsilia pomona?

05.05.2013 19:02, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

but Gonepteryx rhamni - it GONEPTERYX RHAMNI, while this other colors

05.05.2013 16:53, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Gonepteryx rhamni (Linnaeus, 1758)

05.05.2013 16:50, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

05.05.2013 16:50, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

05.05.2013 16:48, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

04.05.2013 19:46, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

04.05.2013 19:45, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

04.05.2013 19:45, Sergei Kotov:

L.bimaculata

04.05.2013 19:41, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

04.05.2013 1:20, Peter Khramov:

O. Superb.

03.05.2013 23:56, Igor Sakhno:

Can Camilla?

03.05.2013 20:43, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Chilades pandava
Identified there: http://macroclub.ru/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=108227.

03.05.2013 16:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.05.2013 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah...
So does Lexias dirtea:)
Could be moved.

03.05.2013 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.05.2013 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.05.2013 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

03.05.2013 13:54, Peter Khramov:

Good sitting.

02.05.2013 23:05, Igor Sakhno:

Same L. bimaculata, perhaps? Geometridae happen to rest like this.

02.05.2013 22:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chiasmia clathrata.

02.05.2013 22:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lomographa bimaculata.

02.05.2013 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Crocallis elinguaria.

02.05.2013 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, everything is correct.
I linked this pic after Alexandr's comment:)
Might as well have added species then too, can't remember.

02.05.2013 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just this time agree with wikipedia. Couldn't attach here scan of a page from the English identification guide, so used wikipedia link. Didn't check the English version, blame me :)

02.05.2013 13:52, Peter Khramov:

Meh, Vasily, Vasily. You yourself were against wikipedia links ;--) Not to name our own English version where this species properly has its common name.

02.05.2013 12:46, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Hm... I used 60mm macro lens instead... No crop. Have few more macro shots wing parts close-up.

02.05.2013 12:17, Peter Khramov:

No matter faster or not, 300mm lens cropped sensor is a right choice for such critters.

02.05.2013 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In English yes, that's right: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaniska_canace.
There is also white admiral or Limenitis camilla.
Different countries use different common names which meant that the only one and right name is the Latin one.

01.05.2013 21:56, Igor Sakhno:

A.crataegi L.

01.05.2013 21:55, Igor Sakhno:

L.camilla.

01.05.2013 20:36, Alexey Fomin:

Pardon... Added the location.

01.05.2013 14:11, Maxim Schwarz:

Blue admiral?...:-)))))

01.05.2013 1:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Already understood, anyway thanks for the info.

30.04.2013 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Exactly-exactly, Lev says absolutely right. That's why me personally, I usually prefer IMO to IMHO to emphasize the presence of pressure.

30.04.2013 16:24, Alex Dumchus:

What I noticed, P. polytes is actually not a faster, regularly doesn't fly higher than 2m above the ground as against P. memnon which are quite spread in Thailand and may be spotted in flower beds only.

30.04.2013 15:11, Lev Bely:

Yury, IMHO is a very old and widely spread internet acronym which is used in order to emphasize the abscence of pressure and the right of an opponent to have his/her own opinion, open talk where every participant may freely share his/her thoughts. And it is never used to offend another:) This is kinda parasite word today, used here and there.

30.04.2013 6:50, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Thanks. Don't you ming some lyrical digression? I was in Thailand not once, met these butterflies many times but always they passed by, never stopped... If they only took a seat once! No hope... Just watching them flying by and felt grateful for that. So when I saw it resting, couldn't believe my eyes! I barely breathed stealing up to it, was afraid to shoo her! Tropical ones are so shy. Couldn't even think of a better background, was shot sitting right there. Little luck that time.

30.04.2013 1:09, Peter Khramov:

Moving...

30.04.2013 1:07, Peter Khramov:

Done.

30.04.2013 1:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

29.04.2013 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Everyone here behaves like that, and who doesn't, reads what others write :))) Then starts doing the same :)

29.04.2013 18:48, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

29.04.2013 18:08, Peter Khramov:

Show me, right now that bastard who wants to look smarty! Ban him immediately. Out of control, show off their intelligence, how dare they!

29.04.2013 11:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr, already got the meaning, but thanks anyway for your time. Some people do want look smarty.

29.04.2013 10:30, Alex Dumchus:

List of acronyms: I — Wikipedia
IMHO – (i) In My Humble[1]/Heartfelt Opinion, c.f. IMO.

28.04.2013 23:50, Irina Nikulina:

Scopula floslactata?

28.04.2013 21:44, Peter Khramov:

Assume, InMyHumbleOpinion.

28.04.2013 20:49, Alex Dumchus:

Delias hyparete.

28.04.2013 19:52, Alex Dumchus:

Right, might have been.

28.04.2013 19:50, Alex Dumchus:

Papilio polytes female.

28.04.2013 2:44, Yuri Semejkin:

What's IMHO?

28.04.2013 1:57, Peter Khramov:

Alexey! (looking severely at Alexey). Where are labels?
P. S. Evgeny, considering other pics of him, most probably it's Moscow region.

28.04.2013 0:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Moscow region? Labels, labels!... :(

28.04.2013 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Antennae from the underside are IMHO dark not light, though not focused properly. So I'm for lineola, maybe should be marked "uncertain". Female, by the way.

27.04.2013 22:26, Irina Nikulina:

Ok, thanks) Will crop with more fantasy)

27.04.2013 14:43, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, here's the link http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/vvdubat/pdf/AZJ2(4)303-321.pdf with the publication on Geometridae (Insecta, lepidoptera: Geometridae) of Bolshehehtsirsky State Natural Reserve (near Khabarovsk) by E. A. Belyaev, S. V. Vasilenko, V. V. Dubatolov, A. M. Dolghikh.
In this publication the moth is named Comibaena delicator, an East Asian subboreal-subtropical forest species, see page 12.

27.04.2013 12:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

27.04.2013 12:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.04.2013 12:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.04.2013 12:49, Peter Khramov:

Irina, it's actually not a rule about 800pix, just an advice, especially for those photographers who send over pics that need additional crop, whilst there is usually no need in crop with your pics. Generally, for future pics just don't leave extras in order to reach these 800pix (also want to say it again that all pics added on the website will be automatically cropped correlated to 1024х768, so when you upload 799х799pix pic that doesn't need crop, it will be cropped anyway).

27.04.2013 12:45, Peter Khramov:

"Nice thingies"
I think, this cockroach should blush receiving such a compliment.

27.04.2013 12:44, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

27.04.2013 12:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.04.2013 12:44, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

27.04.2013 12:43, Peter Khramov:

Here this is taken from the very Sinev where it might have been just a typo. Folks, what are your thoughts?

27.04.2013 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

27.04.2013 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Any opinions more?

27.04.2013 12:41, Peter Khramov:

Consensus needed.

27.04.2013 3:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO lineola.

26.04.2013 23:37, Lev Bely:

Videos added. Animals feel anxious:)

26.04.2013 22:51, Fyodor Pudovikov:

This is Hypomecis roboraria (Denis & Schiffermüller 1775).

26.04.2013 22:48, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2013 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's us who allegedly have "gifted" Americans with this thing, traded to the Colorado potato beetle which is introducent there...

26.04.2013 21:35, Irina Nikulina:

Petr, this species is not illustrated in the gallery, so I put this one before another of better quality appears. Also question/remark: autosuggestion didn't work on the first try, and here as well as in Sinev's Catalogue this species is named as delicator whilst other sources including molbiol.ru instead mention it as delicatior, the same is in Berlov and on Japanese websites (http://www.jpmoth.org/Geometridae/Geometrinae/Comibaena_delicatior.html ; http://olegberlov.narod.ru/geom151.html). Also Yandex and Google offer better choice on delicatior... Which is correct?

26.04.2013 17:32, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2013 17:32, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2013 13:34, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena lonicerae.

26.04.2013 13:34, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2013 13:34, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2013 8:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2013 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.04.2013 8:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is a forest cockroach of the gehus Ectobius, Stephens, 1835. Supposedly Ectobius sylvestris Poda, 1761 as one of the most common over the Moscow region. These cockroaches are great for they never live close to people. Nice thingies.

26.04.2013 1:27, Irina Nikulina:

Petr, the "secret" is simpler) The pic is done long time ago, didn't want to seek for the original image, and couldn't crop this one for it wouldn't then satisfy the terms saying an image should be at least 800pix the larger side) Opted not to break the rule) May be cropped if needed...

26.04.2013 1:15, Peter Khramov:

Irina, why didn't you crop off the left, if not the secret? Diagonal preferred or what?

26.04.2013 0:45, Irina Nikulina:

Anything just to beat this pest: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yiqMFHDJq0M.

26.04.2013 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Looks like one, though not completely...

25.04.2013 23:37, Irina Nikulina:

Drepana falcataria?

25.04.2013 23:30, Irina Nikulina:

Zygaena lonicerae?

25.04.2013 23:26, Irina Nikulina:

Zygaena lonicerae?

25.04.2013 23:18, Igor Sakhno:

What's there on the leaf, a wild cockroach?

25.04.2013 22:29, Lev Bely:


Wisconsin forestry officials appealed to people for help in fight against gypsy moth Lymantria dispar. People are asked to seek for and destroy gypsy moth eggs as the pest is awaited to start hatching over the next few weeks, according to the DNR. Gypsy moth larvae are very voracious eaters and present a serious threat to trees.
Homeowners are urged to search their trees, houses, firewood piles, play-sets and any other outdoor surface for the gypsy moths' quarter-sized egg masses of a specific tan colour.
These eggs should be sprayed with horticultural oil or can be as well drowned in a soapy water. It's not advised to scrape the masses onto the ground, step on them or break them apart since too many eggs will survive, according to the DNR's experts.
Today's TMJ4, http://www.todaystmj4.com
Photo: L. dispar male
USDA Outreach Campaign to Prevent the Spread of Gypsy Moth

Gypsy moth spraying, Dane County, Wisconsin

25.04.2013 17:40, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2013 17:40, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2013 17:40, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2013 17:39, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.04.2013 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Most probably from Thailand.

25.04.2013 12:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where's this pic from (location)? Arichanna melanaria perhaps?

25.04.2013 11:10, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Thymelicus sylvestris (Poda 1761).

25.04.2013 11:08, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Boloria selene (Denis & Schiffermüller 1775).

25.04.2013 11:08, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Carterocephalus palaemon (Pallas 1771).

25.04.2013 11:07, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Carterocephalus silvicola (Meigen 1829).

24.04.2013 0:38, Irina Nikulina:

More than just a problem. Very dangerous thing((... Spreading incredibly fast. 10—12 generations per year! Chemicals are useless, maybe only pheromone traps and entomophagy, especially rapacious Macrolophus caliginosus that's used against Aleyrodidae. Yemen but a few(... This Tuta is coming to Ukraine and Russia. At the end of the last year www.fruit-inform.com reported that the South American moth was discovered in several south and north Ukrainian regions, massive infestations. This threatening pest that has already damaged about 300ha of land was supposedly carried with vegetables from Europe, Turkey and Syria, reported the Main State Plant Quarantine Inspection of Ukraine.
And the part about Russia((: "A dangerous South American pest Tuta absoluta discovered in Krasnodar region and the Republic of Adygea. In 2011 this insect was detected in four districts and three cities of Krasnodar region and in Maikopsky district of the Republic of Adygea, reported the press office of the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance (Rosselkhoznadzor). Tomato mining moth damages tomato, aubergine, pepper and potato crops both in open and closed grounds... Loss in tomato crops may reach 50—100%, reported the press office of the Federal Service for Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance in Krasnodar region and the Republic of Adygea (http://www.fruit-inform.com).

23.04.2013 23:23, Lev Bely:


The Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation said that it has been unable to wipe out the Tuta absoluta moth that was discovered late last year. As reported, the moth destroyed 90% of tomato crops in Yemen bringing losses about $350 million.
Dr. Mohammed Al-Ghashm, the deputy minister of the Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation said they have been spraying a pesticide on crops which kills the male moth, leaving the female’s eggs infertile.
Yemen got serious financial help from other countries. Al-Ghashm said the United States and Community Livelihood Project, a USAID program, granted Yemen $555,000 and $238, respectively. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization donated $120,000 to help combat the invasive moth in Yemen, according to Al-Ghashm.
The Government of Yemen allocated as well YR200 million (around $930,000) in addition to YR50 million (about $232,000) from the Credit Agriculture Cooperative Bank and the Fishing and Agriculture Fund.
Al-Ghashm said the ministry has also launched educational programs, distributing brochures and reaching out to other media outlets.
T. absoluta was first discovered in South America in 1970, then in Spain in 2006, and year later the pest widely spread over France, Italy, Greece, Malta, Morocco, Algeria and Libya. Turkey had it first losses in tomato crops in 2009 when local farms and greenhouses were damaged by T. absoluta.
Wajeeh Al-Matwkil, the head of Researches and Guidance Department at the Ministry of Agriculture, said the moth was first discovered in the northern governorate of Sa’ada in 2012 and later in the country’s west, in Tehama.
Al-Matwakil said the T. absoluta is a surprisingly resilient pest, immune to many types of pesticides. When farmers sprayed chemicals, the moths’ population grew.
Yahiya Al-Salami, a farmer in Dhamar, said the damages caused by this worm led to a rise in tomato prices across the country. “One kilogram of tomatoes used to cost YR200, less than $1. Now tomatoes cost as much as YR700, about $3,” said Al-Salami.
Yemen Times, http://www.yementimes.com
Photo: a damaged tomato, http://www.chemtica.com
How they fight against T. absoluta in Turkey (in Turkish, no translation)

23.04.2013 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, systematics always argue, and the system is not perfect and is not expected. But it is necessary for something to be guided in this swamp, or train in any way.

23.04.2013 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

23.04.2013 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

23.04.2013 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Uh-huh, thanks. Yes, preventive measures aren't universal solution)

22.04.2013 21:29, Lev Bely:

Triple, apparently:)

22.04.2013 14:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Spring generation female which have flown a lot.

22.04.2013 12:16, Yuri Semejkin:

No one has provided a reference to the identity of both species at the same larva, pupa. As they say - taxonomy argue. Maybe still is placed in inaccurate opredelёёnnye?

22.04.2013 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

True and a female (have one drying right now on my mounting board).

22.04.2013 11:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Again, any glitch. Part Copy is not my

22.04.2013 11:07, Yuri Semejkin:

A base? I went on this link, but there is also no biology. According to this explanation, it is clear there are no data on the COI gene only 4 Central (from Luhtanova) and 1st Chinese copies. Who are edusa, who daplidice - is unclear. Differences in gene sequences between individuals of practically no.Unfortunately, the more northern specimens (where theoretically lives edusa) did not study.

Here, the study of mitochondrial DNA also speaks in favor of the species identity of taxa ... Of course, it is necessary to study in detail the material from other regions may be that something will change and then. But I very much doubt.On the basis of small differences in biochemistry to conclude that the two, not one, look, I would not. Especially because all the other signs do not speak in favor of this. The morphology of adults and preimaginalov very similar. Ecological features - too. Available crossed. Conclusion - it is a single species. .But at times, have similarities in appearance butterflies (visually indistinguishable or nearly indistinguishable) there are differences in biology (differences in the tracks. Pupae. Feed). This reference is not reflected. Why split hairs may be the answer to the surface?. It seems that no one was interested in comparative biology of the species.In vskom case, I do not find in the internet.

22.04.2013 10:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Pigs might fly. Would never think this is one of Lepidoptera too.

22.04.2013 8:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

22.04.2013 1:34, Igor Sakhno:

On the jump. Cool!

21.04.2013 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Cool!

21.04.2013 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

nice :)))

21.04.2013 22:28, Irina Nikulina:

Lol, as they say on the web)

21.04.2013 22:23, Lev Bely:

Found on the web: a brief theological debate on never-ending “If we will get wings THERE (after death)?” The right one answers “I say, no any wings! You're just dying and that's all!..”

21.04.2013 21:45, Irina Nikulina:

Well, if that's eyes what should be sharp), take this, can illustrate zina, have no other wing yet)

21.04.2013 21:01, Irina Nikulina:

Here yes, Aricia artaxerxes, cleared this with other photos.

21.04.2013 20:50, Irina Nikulina:

Petr, welcome back) After the faults with icarus and amanda and doubt about artaxerxes-eumedon I try not to hurry))... Though this one is a sure thing, no doubt. Will change for the better)

21.04.2013 20:40, Peter Khramov:

White Army, Black Baron...

21.04.2013 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Olga, meanwhile we're still waiting... Feel worried...

21.04.2013 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Not to worry, won't get worse.

21.04.2013 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Done.

21.04.2013 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Igor, once again photos with no rulers are more kosher.

21.04.2013 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:25, Peter Khramov:

To "identified successfully".

21.04.2013 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Done.

21.04.2013 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Done.

21.04.2013 20:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Anybody say anything more? Should be moved somewhere...

21.04.2013 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Background looks really good.

21.04.2013 20:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:19, Peter Khramov:

Irina, why didn't link the photos to the species right then?

21.04.2013 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:15, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:15, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:14, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Yes to icarus!

21.04.2013 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Summary: Aricia artaxerxes?

21.04.2013 20:11, Peter Khramov:

Sharp should be eyes, and wings depend on photographer's view...

21.04.2013 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Done.

21.04.2013 20:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as the neighbour photo.

21.04.2013 20:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved to hylas.

21.04.2013 20:08, Peter Khramov:

As they say, filipendula-pendula, though there are also grammar nazi who tend to soften "l" saying this is how Latin (always) works...

21.04.2013 20:07, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:07, Peter Khramov:

Vmemoriz.

21.04.2013 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Thymelicus lineola.

21.04.2013 20:03, Peter Khramov:

So there it goes. The pic looks nice, pity lacks sharpness.

21.04.2013 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 20:01, Peter Khramov:

Once upon a time...

21.04.2013 19:59, Peter Khramov:

They sit on it...

21.04.2013 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Nice set of comments, don't even want to dress it with mine...

21.04.2013 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:57, Peter Khramov:

So, eduza.

21.04.2013 19:51, Peter Khramov:

Clubbed, clubbed!

21.04.2013 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Argh, the photos of the species need trimming...

21.04.2013 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Paphia's done.

21.04.2013 19:49, Peter Khramov:

The word "moved" is almost ideal for fast typing. Even the "v" letter can't make it worse.

21.04.2013 19:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 19:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved to double window.

21.04.2013 19:46, Peter Khramov:

Conistra!

21.04.2013 19:46, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:43, Peter Khramov:

Assigned male.

21.04.2013 19:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Done.

21.04.2013 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 19:41, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:41, Peter Khramov:

Locked and loaded!

21.04.2013 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as the neighbour photo.

21.04.2013 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:38, Peter Khramov:

Will be dispar! Wow, the right section of this page is pure fire!

21.04.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Guys, you seem to share promenade :--) Moved.

21.04.2013 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved to morpheus.

21.04.2013 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Truly moved.

21.04.2013 19:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.04.2013 19:26, Peter Khramov:

Where's the bug actually? Can't see any. The pic is properly linked to the species (just as the previous ones), the author is Igor...

21.04.2013 19:23, Peter Khramov:

Art is an idea indeed. Will be wars on that though, such debates... Anyway, first there will be polls with "like"s and then the art side separately.

21.04.2013 19:22, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.04.2013 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, why double comments with the species name? Or had comments been before the photos were linked with species?

21.04.2013 19:20, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I will do.
Basil and everything! Once again I pay attention if a genus / species or other taxa are already on the SITE if not there or not written, DO NOT PLANT NEW. Just throw off my info, and I transfer old.

21.04.2013 1:08, Irina Nikulina:

No need to confirm, just inadvertently pressed the button)

21.04.2013 1:06, Irina Nikulina: This species is identified correctly.

20.04.2013 12:48, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

20.04.2013 12:48, Sergei Kotov:

Pieris napi (Linnaeus, 1758).

20.04.2013 12:47, Sergei Kotov:

Limenitis camilla (Linnaeus, 1764).

20.04.2013 12:47, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

20.04.2013 12:47, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

20.04.2013 12:47, Sergei Kotov:

Argynnis paphia (Linnaeus, 1758).

20.04.2013 12:46, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

20.04.2013 12:46, Sergei Kotov:

Pieris napi (Linnaeus, 1758).

20.04.2013 12:46, Sergei Kotov:

Elophila nymphaeata (Linnaeus, 1758).

20.04.2013 0:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Achillides maackii.

19.04.2013 22:13, Irina Nikulina:

Pure twins)) Just Ukrainian one looks more ruddy than the Far Eastern)

19.04.2013 22:11, Irina Nikulina:

There is a similar species http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/15135, though that one has more edgy forewing, the dark part of the top is more narrow whilst the underside is lighter and has a paler pattern due to which can't be mistaken even in nature)

19.04.2013 21:57, Igor Sakhno:

Interesting.

19.04.2013 21:45, Igor Sakhno:

I'm not as good in Far Eastern. Can be something similar.

19.04.2013 19:23, Irina Nikulina:

Vanessa atalanta.

19.04.2013 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

Polygonia c-album.

19.04.2013 19:00, Irina Nikulina:

Polygonia c-album.

19.04.2013 18:33, Irina Nikulina:

Igor, why "uncertain", any doubt?) Melanargia epimede is it, male I think.

19.04.2013 12:44, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

18.04.2013 23:22, Lev Bely:


ZooKeys 289 (2013) issue features the descriptions of two new moth species of the genus Ypsolopha from the Russian Far East. The authors of the study are Margarita Ponomarenko and Yuliya N. Zinchenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Science FEB RAS.
Moths of this genus are remarkable for their unusual resting pose with bottom upturned and antennae stretched forward. Larvae are as much worth attention: they weave web nests on buds, leaves and twigs to live and feed in, and their cocoons they form on a host plant are shaped like a cradle.
Ypsolophid moths are rather hard to catch. Common ways to collect adults by breeding larvae or attracting imagoes by light don't work quite well with Ypsolopha moths, since larvae of most species of this genus live secludedly on host plant and are hard to discover in nature. It's a big luck for entomologists to find them and a double luck when a moth appears to be new and yet undescribed species.
Russian scientists had the luck to spot and describe two new species of the genus Ypsolopha from the south regions of the Russian Far East. The details of the study are published in ZooKeys 289 (2013) : 25-39 (http://www.pensoft.net/journals/zookeys/issue/289/).
Due to that Ypsolophid moths are thermophilic, they prefer warmer parts of the south regions of the Russian Far East. Over the past 10 years the number of described species has increased more than twice and reached 30 including two new species. This is a fourth of all moths of the genus Ypsolopha known by now.
“Faunistic studies are not only a whim! Exploring species diversity is a task with ecological repercussions on a local, and global scales”, explains Dr. Ponomarenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Science, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Science. “Studying the species diversity in East Asia as a whole and in the Far East of Russia in particular is an important endeavour. Faunistic investigations are only the first step in a long row of scientific tasks towards forming a primary database for further theoretical reconstructions and conclusions for the benefit of biodiversity conservation and species preservation.”
EurekAlert!, http://www.eurekalert.org
Photo: the new species Ypsolopha straminella, Margarita Ponomarenko, http://www.eurekalert.org

18.04.2013 19:28, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

18.04.2013 19:28, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

18.04.2013 19:28, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

18.04.2013 19:28, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

18.04.2013 19:28, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

18.04.2013 12:36, Irina Nikulina:

Satyrium w-album.

18.04.2013 12:34, Irina Nikulina:

Satyrium pruni.

18.04.2013 1:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

OK. By the way, an average eumedon is larger. Not sure where to move the photo. :) Anyway "uncertan". :)

18.04.2013 0:48, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena tityrus.

17.04.2013 16:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, types of stand-alone kind here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/29205 need to drag to the tribeHemileucini(born I did there). Arranges ......

17.04.2013 15:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

17.04.2013 15:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

17.04.2013 15:54, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

17.04.2013 15:54, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

17.04.2013 12:21, Irina Nikulina:

I can't be sure that underside pics #21782 and 97 belong to this very specimen, alas. There were about 6—7 specimens on 1 sq. meter of land, 18 shots in this photo series with no eumedon underside, they look all like artaxerxes. I usually shoot both topside and underside of an each specimen, but this time I counted they turned out all alike... However Evgeny's arguments raised doubt, can be that one eumedon mingled with artaxerxes) the more, I earlier had shot male eumedon in this very place (photo #21817, just uploaded). You are to decide where to refer this photo)

17.04.2013 11:14, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Achlya flavicornis (Linnaeus, 1758).

17.04.2013 11:12, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Catocala fraxini (Linnaeus, 1758).

17.04.2013 1:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

I didn't think of such a version, Aricia eumedon :( Can't say anything sure in this situation, but Evgeny's arguments sound solid.

17.04.2013 1:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Irina, maybe I missed something, but do you have underside pic of this very specimen? If it's pics #21797 and #21782, then no little word of eumedon. :) If these are photos of a different specimen, then this butterfly can be eumedon (and imho it really is, though can't be 100% sure):)) Eumedon and Aricia artaxerxes feed on Geranium, share the same biotopes and often fly side by side. Can't explain plainly why I reckon this specimen is eumedon :) artaxerxes usually have at least slight traces of red lunules on the hind wing topside, which you commonly can't see at all in eumedon males. Imho, they also have rather different wing shape. Alexandr's opinion on the need. :)

16.04.2013 23:37, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena hippothoe male.

16.04.2013 23:11, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena phlaeas.

16.04.2013 23:10, Irina Nikulina:

Lycaena phlaeas.

16.04.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.04.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.04.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.04.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.04.2013 18:51, Sergei Kotov:

Achlya flavicornis (Linnaeus, 1758).

16.04.2013 18:51, Sergei Kotov:

Achlya flavicornis (Linnaeus, 1758).

16.04.2013 18:50, Sergei Kotov:

Achlya flavicornis (Linnaeus, 1758).

16.04.2013 18:50, Sergei Kotov:

Achlya flavicornis (Linnaeus, 1758).

16.04.2013 12:52, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

16.04.2013 12:21, Irina Nikulina:

Evgeny, what's about underside pics #21797 and 21782 (comments)? There was clearly no white "beam" in its median spot.

16.04.2013 2:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Male. Imho rather eumedon. :)

15.04.2013 23:24, Irina Nikulina:

Polyommatus icarus.

15.04.2013 23:01, Irina Nikulina:

Oh yeah....) Did look another way) Alexandr, thanks a lot, I sorted out my huge archive of blues, these species, also thersites cleared out. If possible, I'll torture you later about argus/idas)... and have questions about subsolanus...

15.04.2013 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

If I say they have completely different undersides, you won't believe me. :) See how it's shown in this pic, you'll get where to look at. :)
http://www.lepiforum.de/lepidopterenforum/lepiwiki/pics/jens_philipp/thersites_icarus_agestis_Vergleich_US.jpg

15.04.2013 21:40, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, thanks, artaxerxes is solved, just have some questions about icarus. I looked through photos of the latter, can't see the difference between undersides of these two species? Say #1476 and #1479 pics... see no difference. How to ID when no topside? Maybe dusty scaling at wing bases? Don't want to occupy you for long, but would be great if you find some time to explain an amateur the thing)

15.04.2013 20:56, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, you know better) Let's keep them here then. Don't want to lower my level, even I determined it myself, though the angle is speaking indeed... Ok, let's close photographer's eye on the unsharp forewing) Thanks.

15.04.2013 18:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aricia artaxerxes.

15.04.2013 18:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aricia artaxerxes. Irina, your photos are way better than many other of "good" quality, worth keeping here. The angle is perfect to ID this species, both wing sides are seen.

15.04.2013 18:50, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

15.04.2013 18:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not sure about female. :)

15.04.2013 16:16, Irina Nikulina:

Aricia artaxerxes female?

15.04.2013 16:15, Irina Nikulina:

Photo not good quality, uploaded just for ID the specimen #21797 and #21782. Should be removed after that)

15.04.2013 16:11, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, have no underside of this specimen, but there were plenty of these butterflies in Veronica incana flowers at that time, I've uploaded 2 photos of another specimen #21797 and #21798 that was as well shot that very day (wings half-spread + underside). Some butterflies had the same topside as #21799. Aricia artaxerxes female?

15.04.2013 14:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia orithya habits both Africa and Asia, so nothing special it is in UAE. As for neptis, Neptis hylas.

15.04.2013 0:36, Irina Nikulina:

Will be even 2)

15.04.2013 0:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

If no spots, then let's think this is Aricia artaxerxes, still better to look at those photos. :)

14.04.2013 23:41, Irina Nikulina:

Evgeny, I've got several photos of this butterfly wings half-spread, not good quality. Forewings lack the row of orange-red spots like Aricia agestis has. Probably Aricia artaxerxes?

14.04.2013 23:22, Irina Nikulina:

Probably Neptis hylas (Linnaeus, 1758) which is rather common in Thailand (and originally indigenous in South/Southeast Asia)?

14.04.2013 18:12, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Zygaena filipendulae (Linnaeus, 1758).

14.04.2013 15:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Surely Erannis defoliaria no doubt. The more, this one is quite variable: I've got a few rather different specimens that were all caught in one place one time. Should upload them later.

14.04.2013 14:57, Alex Dumchus:

Though I won't be surprised to know this is sappho after I met Junonia in United Arab Emirates just the same as was in Thailand.

14.04.2013 14:30, Alex Dumchus:

What, sappho finally flew to Thailand? Just like Danaid.

14.04.2013 14:28, Igor Sakhno:

No, can't do it myself.

14.04.2013 14:27, Igor Sakhno:

Right. Will move it.

14.04.2013 14:27, Igor Sakhno:

Indeed.

14.04.2013 14:25, Alex Dumchus:

Yeah, nothing to do in Thailand but paint caught black-veined white butterflies with watercolours. Seriously, I've got some pics in nature, can show when back from Vietnam. Or do Thai guys still paint them, like kind of speciality?

14.04.2013 14:01, Sergei Kotov:

Crambus lathoniellus (Zincken, 1817).

14.04.2013 13:57, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.04.2013 13:56, Sergei Kotov:

That's it, Geometra papilionaria.

14.04.2013 13:56, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus amandus no doubt.

14.04.2013 13:54, Sergei Kotov:

This is Erannis defoliaria! See the caught date 12.10.2012, the moth caught in autumn (October 10th month) which means this is defoliaria!

14.04.2013 13:53, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Erannis defoliaria! See the caught date 12.10.2012, the moth caught in autumn (October 10th month) which means this is defoliaria!

14.04.2013 13:30, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

Either I don't know this species or this is painted black-veined white.

14.04.2013 13:29, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

What's this?

14.04.2013 13:21, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

This is Pallas' Sailer, can't remember its Latin name.

14.04.2013 2:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thanks for the pic, now can say definitely Polyommatus amandus.

14.04.2013 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Th. lineola.

14.04.2013 0:41, Igor Sakhno:

That was in 1982 near Moscow, Balashikha.

14.04.2013 0:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aricia ?agestis.

14.04.2013 0:28, Igor Sakhno:

Looks like Geometra papilionaria.

13.04.2013 21:38, Igor Sakhno:

Maybe Erannis defoliaria?

13.04.2013 21:00, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, here's its underside, no need in this though, already can see that I was wrong) Thanks for the correction. Should be moved.

13.04.2013 20:38, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, I might be wrong. I've got its underside pic, not good quality though, so didn't want to upload that. Now will do for sure ID)

13.04.2013 19:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'd say this is Polyommatus amandus.

13.04.2013 16:52, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

This is Boloria selene.

13.04.2013 16:51, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

This is Carterocephalus silvicola too, but female apparently.

13.04.2013 16:50, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

This is Carterocephalus silvicola.

13.04.2013 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)
http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t383382.html
If you're really interested, then it's worth making "a long search to clear this out". One can't give the sole and right answer, just his/her own personal opinion as to what's right. I'm faunist and content with that at this stage they refer Eastern European populations to Pontia edusa.
:)

13.04.2013 2:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr! Thanks for your elaboration. Still I have a question. Alexandr, if it's not a big dig (don't want to make a long search on the web to clear this out), would you please say if there is any difference in biology between Pontia daplidice and P. edusa (say, larvae or host plants)? Or genitalia?

13.04.2013 2:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus no doubt.

13.04.2013 1:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus.

13.04.2013 1:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icaru.

13.04.2013 1:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Argynnis paphia.

13.04.2013 1:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena dispar.

13.04.2013 1:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, now it's deemed that there is another species in Russia, Pontia edusa, they don't differ in appearance, but I can't answer your possible question what's the difference between them, this is still a problem for taxonomists to solve, anyway it's generally accepted that all previous references to daplidice now considered edusa, which substitutes the species in the east of Europe. :)

13.04.2013 1:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Pontia daplidice.

12.04.2013 22:55, Lev Bely:

Reminds of another similar case with Junonia villida which was "found" in Britain in the early 18th century: http://www.ukbutterflies.co.uk/reports_history.php. Appeared the collector's mistake with labels.

12.04.2013 22:17, Lev Bely:


United States Postal Service released a new spring stamp for big envelopes featuring spicebush swallowtail Papilio troilus.
This is the third in a butterfly series that includes monarch Danaus plexippus and Baltimore checkerspot Euphydryas phaeton. The set of 20 stamps at the two-ounce rate of 66 cents each is available nationwide.
The stamp image is a computer-made and based on photos of dried specimens, so the resulting illustration appears kind of graphic prototype than an exact copy of spicebush swallowtail.
Both P. troilus larvae and imagoes are capable to stay invisible in plain sight so that predators see instead “animal” or even some uneatable thing.
Young brown and white larvae can be mistaken for bird dropping, whilst adult ones perfectly imitate a small snake with naturally looking “eyes” and even forked “tongue”. Pupa appears a dry leaf with realistic vein structure.
The square shape of the stamp was codeveloped with the greeting card industry meant to encourage its using on square envelopes that weigh up to and contain 1 ounce.
Greeting card envelopes printed with a butterfly silhouette that indicates one should pay additional 20 cents postage or use the butterfly stamp. However, this stamp may be as well used for other mail envelopes with irregular sizes and shapes.
Lehigh Acres Citizen, http://www.lehighacrescitizen.com
Photo: spicebush swallowtail stamp, http://www.lehighacrescitizen.com
P. troilus larva imitates snake

12.04.2013 19:10, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Hemithea aestivaria (Hübner 1789).

12.04.2013 19:10, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Hemithea aestivaria (Hübner 1789).

12.04.2013 19:10, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Hemithea aestivaria (Hübner 1789).

12.04.2013 19:04, Fyodor Pudovikov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 16:24, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 15:34, Peter Khramov:

The admin will be out over the next two days and a week or so. So it's quite natural I'm temporarily not replying your messages nor even keeping eyes on the website, except an occasional check. As I come back, will sort everything out, don't feel damped and keep uploading your photos and comments as usual.

12.04.2013 13:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

12.04.2013 13:29, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 13:29, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 13:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Considering that here in Russia we get spinach from Argentina, I wouldn't hurry to send it to the museum.

12.04.2013 13:29, Sergei Kotov:

Thymelicus lineola "uncertain".

12.04.2013 13:25, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 13:24, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 13:24, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2013 13:24, Sergei Kotov:

Opsibotys fuscalis (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

12.04.2013 13:16, Sergei Kotov:

Inachis io (Linnaeus, 1758).

12.04.2013 12:50, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Boloria selene (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775).

12.04.2013 12:23, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Plebejus argus (Linnaeus, 1758).

12.04.2013 12:14, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Angerona prunaria (Linnaeus 1758).

12.04.2013 12:13, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Angerona prunaria (Linnaeus 1758).

11.04.2013 23:58, Lev Bely:

Really, still hovering in undetermined...

11.04.2013 23:32, Igor Sakhno:

Fixed that. Just added a hyphen between C and album, worked out.

11.04.2013 23:15, Igor Sakhno:

Male, as you do!

11.04.2013 23:13, Igor Sakhno:

Seems to be Carterocephalus silvicola Meigen, female.

11.04.2013 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena dispar.

11.04.2013 23:02, Igor Sakhno:

Or: Rheumaptera hastata.

11.04.2013 22:58, Igor Sakhno:

Eulype hastata L. (Cidaria) perhaps?

11.04.2013 22:21, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Glaucopsyche alexis (Poda 1761).

11.04.2013 22:20, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Carterocephalus silvicola (Meigen 1829).

11.04.2013 15:18, Lev Bely:

Sent to their museum collection with a stamp ‘Stuart Curtis' insect’ :D

11.04.2013 15:04, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana selene ([Schiffermuller], 1775).

11.04.2013 15:01, Sergei Kotov:

Heteropterus morpheus (Pallas, 1771).

11.04.2013 14:57, Sergei Kotov:

Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus, 1761).

11.04.2013 14:54, Sergei Kotov:

Inachis io (Linnaeus, 1758).

11.04.2013 14:52, Sergei Kotov:

Lycaena dispar (Haworth, 1802).

11.04.2013 14:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Yeah, I got it. I think there is nothing to be worry about, Petr will notice this bug and fix all the things, add you as identifier in a proper way.

11.04.2013 14:25, Igor Sakhno:

Actually, I knew this is Polygonia c-album since my childhood. Just something went wrong while upload and all my Polygonias appeared as "undetermined".

11.04.2013 13:41, Igor Sakhno:

Neither can be deleted nor reuploaded.

11.04.2013 13:35, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2013 13:32, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2013 11:26, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Polygonia c-album (Linnaeus 1758).

11.04.2013 11:26, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Polygonia c-album (Linnaeus 1758).

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

dispar.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

io.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. phlaeas.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

selene.

11.04.2013 3:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

H. morpheus.

11.04.2013 3:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2013 3:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

11.04.2013 1:54, Igor Sakhno:

All my Polygonias for some reason appeared as "undetermined"...

11.04.2013 1:52, Igor Sakhno:

What's this bug? Appears as "undetermined".

11.04.2013 0:21, Irina Nikulina:

Didn't they happen to identify the moth?))) Hope they let the captured thing out)

10.04.2013 23:55, Igor Sakhno:

This is Siona lineata Sc. What's about new section "Masterpiece photo" where the art value of pics would be debated? Like this very photo, surely one chef-d'oeuvre!

10.04.2013 23:32, Irina Nikulina:

Aphantopus hyperantus.

10.04.2013 22:21, Lev Bely:



Stuart Curtis, 38-year-old father of three children of Carlisle, UK, was very surprised to find a live moth flying inside a sealed bag of spinach.
“I went into Sainsbury’s on Tuesday to stock up after the bank holiday,” Curtis told the News & Star. “We were unpacking it and my partner spotted a live moth in the spinach. I took it straight back to customer services, who gave me a refund — and stamped my receipt with ‘insect’.”
Stuart said he understands that these things can happen, but is astounded that nobody noticed the one-inch moth flying about in the bag.
He added: “What annoys me most, is that customer services told me somebody would call me and I have not yet heard from them — it’s like they don’t take me seriously.”
“Maybe I’m clutching at straws, but it seems they don’t see how potentially dangerous it could be.”
Stuart said he was particularly concerned that any bugs the moth may have had could have spread into the spinach and been ingested by his three-year-old daughter or twin one-year-old boys.
“Maybe this happens 20 times a day,” he added, “but I’ve never experienced it before.”
“I might not have acted quite so Victor Meldrew about it if someone had had the decency to call me back.”
A spokeswoman for Sainsbury’s said: “Incidents like this are extremely rare as we have the highest standards.”
“We are investigating this and would like to apologise to Mr Curtis for the inconvenience caused.”
News & Star, http://www.newsandstar.co.uk
Photo: Stuart Curtis revising spinach, http://www.newsandstar.co.uk

10.04.2013 21:09, Olga Averyanova:

Oops, I dried a couple, forgot about them, will upload tomorrow :)

10.04.2013 17:39, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris illustris.

10.04.2013 17:38, Alex Dumchus:

Pseudoautomeris brasiliensis.

10.04.2013 17:37, Alex Dumchus:

Automeris melanops.

10.04.2013 17:36, Alex Dumchus:

Rothschildia jacobaea.

10.04.2013 17:35, Alex Dumchus:

Rothschildia hopfferi.

10.04.2013 12:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.04.2013 12:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.04.2013 12:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.04.2013 12:34, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.04.2013 12:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.04.2013 12:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.04.2013 1:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pleuroptya ruralis.

10.04.2013 1:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spilosoma lutea.

10.04.2013 1:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Euclidia glyphica.

09.04.2013 20:35, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

09.04.2013 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cyclosia papilionaris, species identified correctly.

08.04.2013 22:15, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Selenia dentaria (Fabricius, 1775).

08.04.2013 19:06, Peter Khramov:

Brilliant. Will write it exactly that.

08.04.2013 18:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

No need to add anything, this is Problepsis apollinaria.

08.04.2013 15:58, Peter Khramov:

Uh-huh, goes to.

08.04.2013 13:56, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana selene.

08.04.2013 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Already add the species, daemons.

08.04.2013 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Right, moved to temerata.

08.04.2013 13:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

08.04.2013 13:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.04.2013 13:40, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Rivula sericealis (Scopoli, 1763).

08.04.2013 13:40, Fyodor Pudovikov:

So is it.

08.04.2013 11:54, Andrey Ponomarev:

Lomographa temerata.

08.04.2013 8:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Absolutely not insisting on the correctness of my ID. I've got such from Thailand labelled as Problepsis albidior.

08.04.2013 0:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Looks like Geometra papilionaria L.

07.04.2013 23:00, Irina Nikulina:

Pryeria sinica female?

06.04.2013 20:08, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

06.04.2013 19:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry, if you checked this website www.thaibugs.com, it has the same moth, but the ID is doubtful, www.jpmoth.org has different moth as well as well as the majority of other websites.

06.04.2013 16:56, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Agree with more qualified colleague...

06.04.2013 16:06, Peter Khramov:

Needed to add the species...

06.04.2013 16:04, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.04.2013 16:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.04.2013 16:03, Peter Khramov:

And this one is to be databased...

06.04.2013 16:03, Peter Khramov:

Still needed to add the species...

06.04.2013 16:02, Peter Khramov:

To rhesus "uncertain"?

06.04.2013 16:01, Peter Khramov:

Needed to add the species or move to synonym...

06.04.2013 16:00, Peter Khramov:

Now male.

06.04.2013 15:59, Peter Khramov:

Enough for "uncertain"?

06.04.2013 15:59, Peter Khramov:

Request to the moderators to add the species.

06.04.2013 15:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.04.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.04.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.04.2013 15:56, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.04.2013 15:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.04.2013 15:56, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.04.2013 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.04.2013 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.04.2013 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Fedor, reply something...

06.04.2013 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.04.2013 15:53, Peter Khramov:

Any suggestions more?

06.04.2013 15:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.04.2013 15:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.04.2013 15:51, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

06.04.2013 15:51, Peter Khramov:

Yes, was bug. Fixed.

06.04.2013 15:49, Peter Khramov:

Dimitry, what can't you see?) Or you don't know how many Caligo species are in the Nizhny Novgorod Butterfly House?

06.04.2013 15:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.04.2013 15:48, Peter Khramov:

Really, what?

06.04.2013 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved back to "undetermined".

06.04.2013 15:45, Peter Khramov:

Needed to add the species.

06.04.2013 15:44, Peter Khramov:

Uh-huh, thanks.

06.04.2013 3:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Igor, where and when? In Kharkov?

05.04.2013 22:31, Irina Nikulina:

Hilarious indeed) Along with that join the celebrations) Good luck and prosperity to you, Petr, and your website!)

05.04.2013 22:04, Lev Bely:

Now listen to that grasshopper sound I'd sent you. Neighbours would appreciate. Here's the link to all interested, such a hilarious sound: http://sixlegsphoto.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/cataloipus2.wav.

05.04.2013 21:25, Alex Dumchus:

Looks similar to Adhemarius fulvescens. I checked Costa Rica Sphingidae in this useful species list: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/silk/satlinks.htm.

05.04.2013 21:19, Peter Khramov:

Yeah. The sound now works in full, so dear neighbours, get off my lawn!

05.04.2013 16:21, Lev Bely:

Today our comandante has a birthday, my celebrations to him! Petr, cheers to you!

05.04.2013 15:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Incorrect ID. There are at least 4 Euploea species plus some Ideopsis and Euthalia.

05.04.2013 15:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What actually emerged from these?

05.04.2013 15:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

05.04.2013 15:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nothing here can be seen, the photo sucks.

05.04.2013 15:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Underside if possible (though will barely help).

05.04.2013 15:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stuck in undetermined.

05.04.2013 9:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Assume mycalesis perseus.

05.04.2013 9:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mycalesis mineus.

05.04.2013 8:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Comostola laesaria.

05.04.2013 0:50, Irina Nikulina:

Masterpieces!) Perfectly drawn plants...! Lev, did you notice for these beauties only parchment and rag paper..... and what colours!!! Thanks, cheering me up before bed!) I'll look through it more thoroughly, also interesing... Maria Sibylla has a birthday today, or to be precise, already yesterday, April 4th)

05.04.2013 0:23, Lev Bely:

Here one more, 300 year old illustration by Maria Sibylla Merian: http://www.ras.ru/sybilla/08de7685-f5d8-498d-b902-48fa036ef306.aspx?hidetoc=0.

04.04.2013 21:49, Fyodor Pudovikov:

This is Odontopera bidentata (Clerck, 1759).

04.04.2013 21:20, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Carterocephalus silvicola (Meigen, 1829).

04.04.2013 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can't agree, I'm for Lomaspilis opis.

04.04.2013 21:05, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Idaea biselata (Hufnagel, 1767).

04.04.2013 21:04, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Miltochrista miniata (Forster, 1771).

04.04.2013 21:03, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Lomaspilis marginata (Linnaeus, 1758).

04.04.2013 21:03, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Macaria notata (Linnaeus, 1758).

04.04.2013 20:59, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Asthena albulata (Hufnagel, 1767).

04.04.2013 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think you can do something like the subtitle "Pictures of the form on stamps" for each individual. The main theme of the website after photos of insects (in nature, collection, etc.) to bring down everything in one pile is not gud: suddenly with time and photo will appear.

04.04.2013 20:56, Fyodor Pudovikov:

Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775).

04.04.2013 11:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Elymnias casiphone.

04.04.2013 11:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Elymnias casiphone.

04.04.2013 11:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea crameri.

04.04.2013 11:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

04.04.2013 11:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cyclosia papilionaris.

04.04.2013 11:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cyclosia papilionaris.

04.04.2013 11:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

But can be also Lexias pardalis.

04.04.2013 11:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Some Limacodidae.

04.04.2013 11:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

04.04.2013 10:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why no.

04.04.2013 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Problepsis albidior.

04.04.2013 8:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pieris dulcinea.

04.04.2013 8:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias hyparete metarete male.

04.04.2013 8:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Definitely not Theretra clotho, my suggestion is Theretra rhesus.

04.04.2013 8:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Right, Eupterote naessigi male.

04.04.2013 8:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eupterote asclepiades male.

04.04.2013 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Antheraea rosieri male.

04.04.2013 8:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

antheraea helferi female.

04.04.2013 8:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

antheraea helferi male.

04.04.2013 8:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Acosmeryx shervillii.

04.04.2013 8:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ambulyx pryeri.

04.04.2013 7:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cyrestis cocles.

03.04.2013 23:51, Peter Khramov:

One person offered to arrange a non-illustrated types of online scans of stamps with these same species (it has). Who thinks that - should do so on the basis of better than nothing or is it a bust? Scans have for several hundred species that we have no images ...

03.04.2013 20:58, Alex Dumchus:

Quite similar. I've got its male labelled, but it's about 4—5cm smaller, so doubt.

03.04.2013 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

03.04.2013 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Request to the moderators to sort out the species.

03.04.2013 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.04.2013 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Done. Alexandr, users can't delete but recently uploaded pics (an hour ago).

03.04.2013 17:52, Alex Dumchus:

Hm, somehow I can't. Petr, please help? Better to remove 13975.

03.04.2013 17:51, Alex Dumchus:

Right, will delete that one in a moment.

03.04.2013 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

03.04.2013 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.04.2013 15:09, Peter Khramov:

Dimitry, I am proud of your guts ;--)

03.04.2013 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Done.

03.04.2013 13:04, Lev Bely:

Again somewhere close: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14511. Dmitry, you turn out to have identified this already. Should be grouped, these two.

03.04.2013 12:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Whether spit on the definition, or to the author, or remove Fautua avoid damage karma.
Peter and Karma is what you got. The Law of Cause and Effect manifests itself. In another-who aspires to

03.04.2013 11:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where its topside?

03.04.2013 11:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Double pic #13975.

03.04.2013 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Orthosia cerasi but Orthosia populeti.

03.04.2013 10:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Orthosia cerasi but Orthosia populeti.

03.04.2013 10:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Bunaea alcinoe female.

03.04.2013 10:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Imbrasia epimethea female.

03.04.2013 10:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pseudimbrasia deyrollei ? male.

03.04.2013 10:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Epiphora ploetzi.

03.04.2013 10:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Assume Gonimbrasia belina male.

03.04.2013 10:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Athletes ethra probably.

03.04.2013 10:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Assume Pseudantheraea discrepans.

03.04.2013 10:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Imbrasia truncata male.

03.04.2013 9:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, Manduca schausi.

03.04.2013 9:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The book Guide to the BUTTERFLIES OF RUSSIA and adjacent territories Volume 1. PENSOFT, Sofia - Moscow. 1997, available online on http://rusinsects.com/pi-dulc.htm.

03.04.2013 0:52, Peter Khramov:

What the hell does ssp. here?

03.04.2013 0:30, Igor Sakhno:

Cool! Time to make special section "rare shot" (as it was in the 1970s in that TV-show "In the world of animals").

03.04.2013 0:14, Lev Bely:

Heliconius melpomene ssp.?

03.04.2013 0:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Who is this Tuzov? Where to seek for?

03.04.2013 0:06, Lev Bely:

Heliconius ismenius.

03.04.2013 0:04, Lev Bely:

Heliconius ismenius again.

02.04.2013 23:58, Lev Bely:

Heliconius ismenius ssp.?

02.04.2013 23:36, Lev Bely:

schausi?

02.04.2013 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Therefore moved to the species.

02.04.2013 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Added to the photos of the specimen...

02.04.2013 21:47, Peter Khramov:

So said I that there was the "?" mark...

02.04.2013 21:39, Lev Bely:

Farfalle!:)

02.04.2013 21:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That was comma (English keyboard layout).

02.04.2013 21:16, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, thanks, Lev, yesterday I saw this pic at 40:1, was going to share the same link but changed my mind thinking on "Assorted italian pasta"))

02.04.2013 20:59, Lev Bely:

Irina, thanks, great pic of Papilio maackii. Always a pleasure to see scales so uncommonly enlarged.

02.04.2013 20:44, Lev Bely:

Topside: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/14518. Just randomly checked photos next to this, #14520 and #14518.

02.04.2013 19:17, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, do not forget to inform, that you have to work, as determined by the schedule.

02.04.2013 19:12, Alex Dumchus:

Manduca, can't make further ID.

02.04.2013 18:40, Alex Dumchus:

P.polytes, I think, is the most common swallowtail in Southeast Asia, at least in Thailand.

02.04.2013 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

Lost somewhere between pics, but as I can remember this is H.anomala.

02.04.2013 17:39, Peter Khramov:

... heard habitally and crept under the table hands on head...

02.04.2013 17:38, Peter Khramov:

Cause there was "?" in your comment...

02.04.2013 17:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nah, just had at hand the book "Sphingidae of Costa Rica".

02.04.2013 17:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why "uncertain"? 100%.

02.04.2013 17:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Check Tuzov, they're quite different, even habitually.

02.04.2013 16:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The concept of an inaccurate determination of, in my opinion, means that someone does not agree, or not sure of the definition. In this case, the author does not agree, and certain inaccuracies. It seems simple.

02.04.2013 16:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.04.2013 16:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.04.2013 16:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.04.2013 16:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.04.2013 16:16, Peter Khramov:

Moderators, please conclude the case, either add a new one or move to the old one's synonyms.

02.04.2013 16:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.04.2013 16:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.04.2013 16:14, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.04.2013 16:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.04.2013 16:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Dmitry, you got to work seriously! Got internet at home?

02.04.2013 16:13, Peter Khramov:

Goes to/illustrated.

02.04.2013 16:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Dim, can you tell about the difference between these two?

02.04.2013 16:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

02.04.2013 16:11, Peter Khramov:

Right, double deleted.

02.04.2013 16:10, Peter Khramov:

Going to C. cocles since the blue is hardly seen.

02.04.2013 16:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.04.2013 16:09, Peter Khramov:

They do come to the light.

02.04.2013 16:09, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved. First photo in nature.

02.04.2013 16:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.04.2013 16:07, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.04.2013 16:06, Peter Khramov:

The essence of the dispute as follows: what to do if the butterfly is defined, though inaccurately, and the author foty with the definition does not agree. Whether spit on the definition, or to the author, or remove Fautua avoid damage karma.

02.04.2013 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Elymnias sp.

02.04.2013 15:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The essence of the dispute is not clear. Butterfly determined - albeit inaccurately. A man appeared to think 100% - to determine exactly indicate the error. Let hanging in inaccurate than sink into uncertain.

02.04.2013 14:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

02.04.2013 13:00, Alex Dumchus:

Xylophanes loelia underside.

02.04.2013 10:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

appias genus. Exactly appias libythea.

02.04.2013 10:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

libythea olferna.

02.04.2013 10:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

catopsilia pomona.

02.04.2013 10:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Three Euploea species.

02.04.2013 10:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio helenus.

02.04.2013 10:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cyrestis cocles on the left and the blue is Discolampa ethion.

02.04.2013 10:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mycalesis sp double pic #20642.

02.04.2013 10:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio polytes? ragged female.

02.04.2013 10:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There are 2 Euploea species.

02.04.2013 10:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Pieris dulcinea.

02.04.2013 10:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stolidoptera tachasara.

02.04.2013 10:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xylophanes germen.

02.04.2013 9:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xylophanes jordani.

02.04.2013 9:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xylophanes rhodina.

02.04.2013 9:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xylophanes ceratomioides.

02.04.2013 9:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xylophanes acrus.

02.04.2013 9:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Adhemarius fulvescens.

02.04.2013 9:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Adhemarius dariensis.

02.04.2013 9:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypolimnas sp, where is its topside?

02.04.2013 2:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Keep Dmitry and Vasily.

02.04.2013 2:37, Peter Khramov:

Remove?

02.04.2013 0:36, Irina Nikulina:

Lev, thanks, impressive! Want to share something too) Half year ago I was digging sources for info on the biology of my favourite butterfly Papilio maackii that was my first in knowing Far East, so I happened to find this shot: http://www.flickr.com/photos/javier_replinger/6904313920/in/photostream. Suchwise I knew about photographer Javier Replinger from Spain and his artwork, he uses the same techniques and JML lenses. His works are as much great. Check them http://www.flickr.com/photos/javier_replinger/. 20Х is not the limit, he even has a pic (funny entitled) of a butterfly wing shot at 80:1 http://500px.com/photo/3055544, it uses ELWD stuff though.

02.04.2013 0:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Leave it undefined. Why is that? It seems that in the discussions agreed that the species is required to determine the top and underside of the same definition osobi.Chto only one top or underside is unrealistic. And endure, just to move ....

01.04.2013 21:47, Lev Bely:

Dutch photographer Johan J.Ingles-Le Nobel makes stunning macro photos of insects and more like this wonderful picture of the Blue Emperor swallowtail Papilio ulysses wing shot at 20:1.
For those who are curious about technical side, there are Johan's words: “This very shot uses JML20x with cellophane wrapper diffuser, with 2 Ikea Jansjo Lights, one placed very far to southwest but close to diffuser (thus producing shallow angle creating the tips) and another more frontal, but further away. Exposure 2.5s. Note the imported EXIF is wrong, this (ISO) was actually at 400 rather than 80.”
Johan's other artwork can be seen on his page on Flickr.com, http://www.flickr.com/photos/jingleslenobel/sets/72157623492127788/.
The Blue Emperor swallowtail Papilio ulysses wing macro, Johan J.Ingles-Le Nobel
Papilio ulysses
The Madagascan sunset moth Chrysiridia rhipheus wing macro, Johan J.Ingles-Le Nobel
Sunset Moth Scales

01.04.2013 17:48, Alex Dumchus:

Ok, tomorrow will add it.

01.04.2013 17:48, Alex Dumchus:

Might it be M.helenor marinita? Looks very alike. Usually traders raise them. I'll add a pic tomorrow, underside is just the spitting image of this.

01.04.2013 16:14, Sergei Kotov:

Xestia c-nigrum.

01.04.2013 16:13, Sergei Kotov:

Melanchra persicariae.

01.04.2013 15:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Better underside pic.

01.04.2013 15:17, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitry, they came non-identified from Costa Rica, and H.eson has had this label since long ago by Ins.col.shop. It's also here, on the website. Both look quite similar. I can add its photo, like that game Find 10 Differences.

01.04.2013 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How come this flew to the genus? Just Caligo with no species name...

01.04.2013 14:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I agree with Dmitry. It is necessary to do so to clarify the situation.

01.04.2013 14:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Wrap in ill-defined.

01.04.2013 13:20, Peter Khramov:

So, formed an unusual situation for the site: the definition, though imprecise, like there, with a few people, but the author foty him (definition) disagrees. And neither one nor the other side of each other is not convinced. Well, that no offense. Nonetheless.
With fotoy ought to do something. Either leave in uncertain or transferring inaccurate.The first option is bad because, in fact, hanging Fota no formal definition, when in fact anything to do it (the definition) is available. In addition, with the views of the people and more, including more professional than the author of the picture.On the other hand, the author is probably still has some rights to have his phot call or not call, and he had a specific area, not every "Europeans" understandable.Because I stand on this issue a separate discussion, that there was some course of action for the future, which all agree:
Priority in these situations, the author foty or community site?Interested vysheozvuchennyh opinion not only of the parties but also all users of the site, more, I repeat, it is not a specific fote, and in principle a template for the future.

01.04.2013 12:55, Peter Khramov:

The situation for the first site, because HZ. I thought not to write a correct definition, is the author of the photo does not agree. But in general, this is still voprosets, so now is a discussion if not within the scope of the foty, and the future for all of this to happen ...

01.04.2013 1:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.04.2013 0:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xylophanes loelia. Wrong label, maybe?

01.04.2013 0:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Morpho peleides "identified successfully".

01.04.2013 0:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, peleides female.

01.04.2013 0:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Let's 13-14

01.04.2013 0:25, Irina Nikulina:

Petr, then no questions more if they're synonyms. Even to "identified successfully".

31.03.2013 23:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, how to understand your statement to last post Photo Butterfly # 6380. "Multiple users have shown that this can be attributed to Fautua Celastrina ladonides (inaccurate definition), but the author photo believes that data are insufficient even for the inaccurate determination.Therefore, for the time being Fota remains uncertain, to illustrate the benefit that there are other kinds of shots. "
Anyone can make mistakes with the definition, but your post you give the right to decide the correct definition, a person not familiar with the modern taxonomy of butterflies and serious work on their regional fauna.Then tell me what's the point generally does not identify specific photos, the author photos will speak, and you prove to me that it is this kind of, it seems to me that the other. It takes away all the better picture. and even after all this discus finals looks very unsightly. after reading all this do not want to define or anything.I was not offended, but Yuri Semeykin identify more just will not, sorry for the lost time, and I think the author's post on this photo will agree with me if they read sluzhebntsyu topic.

31.03.2013 22:51, Peter Khramov:

With regards to the date. 13-14 If, then, most likely, junk still will not have time to bring the Entomological. If a week later, it will probably be in time. Question: is this value or not?

31.03.2013 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Okay, gentlemen, let's have the truth and the round, if there is a new disk imaging, and chewed all the same.A brief summary for those who are interested, that in view of the fote, but who is not master reading all the comments (or, like me, will be mastered, but Nitsche not understand): several users have shown that this can be attributed to FautuaCelastrina ladonides @ @ (inaccurate definition), but the author photo believes that data are insufficient even for the inaccurate determination.Therefore, for the time being Fota remains uncertain, to illustrate the benefit of that kind there are other pictures.

31.03.2013 22:44, Peter Khramov:

As a dummy in Lepidoptera but pro in the website catalogue, I want to point out that automedon and polyxena are synonyms on the website (on the Website!). So can be moved at least to "uncertain"!

31.03.2013 21:58, Irina Nikulina:

Yes, right, Eryphanis. Dmitry, thanks! Tend more to Eryphanis automedon, though not sure. Eryphanis polyxena is an alike species... Maybe pros add something?

31.03.2013 19:26, Peter Khramov:

Now doleplivayu forum. There will be a quotation and stuff like that. At the same time there will be the respective roles of comments for the species, ph, etc.

31.03.2013 18:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, and nothing can come up with quoting previous comments? And it is difficult to understand where the quote, and where the author's text.

31.03.2013 18:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.03.2013 18:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Hello, Alexander!
I do not understand on what basis you put all of our discussion into question? Do you want a 100% guarantee determination, it just can not be (in this version). Special literature, as you write, difficult for an amateur Alexander, the theme on the matter in general is closed, so in poreshali agent Ira.But few will answer your questions. I do not doubt your determination. As you yourself said, in this case, 100% is impossible to define, but it was discussed more than once. Regarding the reference to the atlas, like the 2004 edition. All images are made on the film, quality video because I'm low and results in this example ..... I will not continue this topic, so as not to load the page.infoy not required. For me it is better to use the necessary literature, despite its complexity (I would like to modernizing sometimes it helped), or did not participate in the discussion at all. If we provide links, the sources for quality, not just ...I hope to answer no sooner had offended and, of something to say, and not always in the form of a smooth, but not me, not the sides never hurt each other. Now here before, to write something, we have to zadumyvatsya, and whether it is necessary. You can even remove the page or the top part of it, or leave it as is. To et al.It could see no need to conduct a dialogue. Ps not required to answer, and so there is already a lot of off-topic written

31.03.2013 18:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, nothing better. According to the website taxonomy, this is P. zagreus chrysomelus.

31.03.2013 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, say, their opinions have not changed, and specify. from "not argiolus" to "ladonides, inaccurate determination." The discussion considered all possible options. I do not understand on what basis you put all of our discussion into question? Do you want a 100% guarantee determination, it just can not be (in this version).Special literature, as you write, for an amateur difficult, and popular, where very often mistakes and outdated information, it is the truth.
So it is very difficult to come to concrete results.
I am very gracious to you for a large number of interesting photos from the Far East, the species that is rarely seen.But it is not necessary in this case to bring the situation to absurdity.
Peter. do not arrange dies. :). Strife is not present, there is a lack of understanding and acceptance of the views of others. As an exception to put some kind of three authors, Germans lepiforume do that.
To arrange such discussions under each photo inaccurately determined, it is too.Yuri, require that at least each photo for each definition, the result on the basis of which it was made, is not correct, if not clear, should be requested to specify the differences, and determined already decided to explain or not. Just do not always time and sometimes useless as an example here.No one wanted to offend and all have great respect for.

31.03.2013 16:14, Peter Khramov:

So what, leave it as it's now?

31.03.2013 16:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.03.2013 16:11, Peter Khramov:

OMG...

31.03.2013 14:53, Peter Khramov:

Who is there really pro in exotic Sphingidae, eh?

31.03.2013 14:51, Peter Khramov:

With tropics. Russia is about 2200. No stats of the USSR.

31.03.2013 14:45, Igor Sakhno:

Seems a female.

31.03.2013 8:12, Yuri Semejkin:

With tropics or just the ex-USSR?

31.03.2013 1:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not Caligo, rather something of the genus Eryphanis.

31.03.2013 1:16, Irina Nikulina:

Morpho peleides?

31.03.2013 1:05, Irina Nikulina:

Caligo memnon?

30.03.2013 14:47, Alex Dumchus:

Looks very similar to Hippotion eson, but I've got the latter from Central Africa. Such a wide distribution?

29.03.2013 15:46, Peter Khramov:

Great, we reached 3500 illustrated species.

29.03.2013 15:39, Peter Khramov:

Maybe even offer to shoot?))

29.03.2013 15:02, Igor Sakhno:

Might be female.

29.03.2013 15:01, Igor Sakhno:

I saw once one took off the grass.

29.03.2013 14:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Demolition theme.

29.03.2013 14:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Whatever.

29.03.2013 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Already correctly identified by the author, I see the species name in the database though he didn't manage to link it properly. So he's the author of the ID then.

29.03.2013 14:13, Peter Khramov:

That's the same sad voice and can be heard from all sides.

29.03.2013 14:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Only Nino. Not to travel now and the season ahead.

29.03.2013 13:39, Peter Khramov:

If all the rubble Nizhny Novgorod to Moscow, but it will be added plus to Moscow - then it will be more due to Moscow and Moscow Region. But with regions from the people for the time being, I have not heard that, they say, would be to Moscow, yes, but not in Moscow - not hotstsa. Only heard that in general do not take your ass hotstsa or in Moscow or somewhere else outside of their region.Well, if such a thing, you want to take an armful of Stas and the company and went to the capital: -)) I'll be in those numbers in Moscow and in NN. Although the LV chamber woulda more.

29.03.2013 12:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturnia pavonia female.

29.03.2013 8:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Afaik, they left neyi as a species and the rest were joined to P. zagreus.

28.03.2013 21:11, Alex Dumchus:

I looked more on the web, found in biolib, they joined alcolius and bachus, whilst neyi was left as a different species. Whom to believe?

28.03.2013 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Check this: http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/pterourus_zagreus_chrysomelus_types.htm. What a mess...

28.03.2013 20:28, Alex Dumchus:

What's with sources? Say these:
Pterourus bachus (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865) TL: Colombia

Pterourus bachus bachus (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1865) TL: Colombia M T

Pterourus bachus chrysomelus (Rothschild & Jordan, 1906) TL: Peru; Bolivia M T S

Pterourus neyi (Niepelt, 1909) TL: Ecuador

Pterourus neyi neyi (Niepelt, 1909) TL: Ecuador M T

Pterourus neyi josianae Möhn, 2001 TL: Peru M T

Pterourus neyi bedoci (Le Cerf, 1925) TL: French Guiana

Pterourus zagreus (E. Doubleday, 1847) TL: Venezuela

Pterourus zagreus zagreus (E. Doubleday, 1847) TL: Venezuela M T

Pterourus zagreus batesi T. Racheli & L. Racheli, 1996 TL: Peru

Pterourus zagreus chrysoxanthus (Fruhstorfer, 1915) TL: Peru M T

Pterourus zagreus nigroapicalis Bollino & Sala, 1998 TL: Peru M T

Pterourus zagreus baueri Möhn, 2001 TL: Brazil (Am) M T

Pterourus ascolius (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1864) Orange Mimic-Swallowtail TL: Ecuador; Colombia

Pterourus ascolius zalates (Godman & Salvin, 1890) Costa Rica to C Panama M T S

Pterourus ascolius ascolius (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1864) N Colombia (S. Santa Marta to Magdalena V.) M T S L

Pterourus ascolius daguanus (Rothschild & Jordan, 1906) W Colombia (Choco) M T S

Pterourus ascolius rosenbergi (H. Druce, 1903) TL: Ecuador M T

28.03.2013 20:11, Lev Bely:

Dmitry, thanks. Really curious to know what's the species.

28.03.2013 20:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Still Pterourus bachus isn't basically Papilio zagreus synonym, and chrysomelus (Rothschild & Jordan, 1906) is a subspecies. How come subspecies can be deemed as a species? With all that I moved it to P. zagreus.

28.03.2013 18:17, Alex Dumchus:

Pterourus bachus chrysomelus (Rothschild & Jordan, 1906). Those sources I checked didn't join this with zagreus. Also there was Pterourus ascolius (C. Felder & R. Felder, 1864) as a different species. If join them, then they should be combined with all the rest Pterourus neyi (Niepelt, 1909).

28.03.2013 18:12, Irina Nikulina:

I am not going to add anything, but apparently will have to answer in detail to avoid misunderstandings and grew a tendency to "red stamp". You're absolutely right - I'm always for the truth, clarified in the correct form. Therefore, I explain:
1. Jura, please read carefully - I have not referred to the opinion of Al.Zhakova on the species, and his words about the fact that the information is sufficient, and I quote your correspondence with him:
03.21.2013 0:07 Alexander Zhakov: Yes, like enough.
03.20.2013 23:53 Yuri Semeykin: I would not tolerate, at least for now. Like all came to the conclusion that of information in this case is not enough.
03.20.2013 18:50 Alexander Zhakov: Peter and the transferred.:)
In this regard, I wrote yesterday - "I like Al. Zhakov, I think that seems to be enough said on this page, and here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21521 »

2. "What is it you find that the views have changed?" The answer to that. My views have not changed. From the very beginning, as soon as you sent me a link, I suggested (02.19.13), it is not Celastrina filipjevi (on the underside). Next, I have deleted and Celastrina oreas, becausethey are very similar to filipjevi. From 4 previously discussed here remains the most likely types of 2. Then I found in the guide: butterfly with almost the same underside, and wrote about it below 3.18.13. Again quoting the post with the comments Al. Zhakova:
19.03.2013 0:07 Alexander Zhakov Irina, I fully agree that the Forum will keep a record of the volume of comment. :))
03.18.2013 22:46 Irina Nikulina: Do not give rest to this photo). Ure, the new guide: "Fauna of the Ussuri taiga", edited by AEVrischa which acquired, flying away from you, this kind of early spring is uniquely defined as Celastrina ladonides (copper-butterfly ladonopodobnaya). This atlas you probably have (including "Flora" is exactly)), see pages 116-117. Photo, by the way, Yuri Chistyakov
3. Realizing that it does not give full confidence in the determination of the species, I started to look in their photo archives and found Celastrina ladonides.Yesterday I gave you the link to this photo and comment under him write again: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21521. There's no doubt in determining the form, because there is female lays eggs on the food plants lespedeza. I will not repeat, see comment. Comparing the butterfly on his photos, butterfly satin ed.Vrischa and butterflies on thine image, come, I think, the most probable conclusion - that this kind of photo Celastrina ladonides.
Actually, the same conclusion in appearance came earlier and more dvoe- Al. Zhakov and Eugene. Caroline (eschё17.02.13g)
Again I quote (not completely, so as not to prolong the post):
02.17.2013 15:48 Evgeny Caroline ... ..Netochny ladonides - the most obvious option ....
17.02.2013 15:35 Alexander Zhakov ... ..Privedennuyu pictured butterfly, I think you can put into the form ladonides inaccurate definition.
I suppose it meant Al. Zhakov when you wrote, "three members of the discussion came to the same opinion the most likely."Again, I agree with him that "on this particular photo can be no doubt, therefore, must make a determination (a type defined inaccurately)"
I do not see who and when to change opinion., As you write. In my opinion, it is such, and was at least 17.02. I have - especially since I have never been expressed here about any form except ladonides.And the question of how to transfer photos or not- that's really here just do not I decide, it's up to the moderators and it was suggested Alexander, I'm just reminded Peter, what kind of a question.
Here, perhaps, and all I can say about this, if no emotion.Sorry for the long post, I wanted to finally clarify his opinion, without insisting on its 100-% fidelity (especially because it is a question of determining the type of software image).

28.03.2013 16:45, Alex Dumchus:

h.marinita.

28.03.2013 16:43, Alex Dumchus:

New colour variation M.helenor marinata (to me at least). Can anybody say if it's aberration or just a variety type?

28.03.2013 16:08, Alex Dumchus:

Last year here in Rostov region we got lots of both species, in the beginning of June it was N. polychloros, then at the end of June was N. xanthomelas, and a week ago I saw a couple of polychloros just before the snow.

28.03.2013 16:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lev, you were right.

28.03.2013 16:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Everything is as usual. We meet, as always, one composition. I wonder if it was in Moscow - a lot of people would come?

28.03.2013 15:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lev said right.

28.03.2013 15:56, Alex Dumchus:

Underside.

28.03.2013 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Naah... don't hunt them. Would do N. polychloros, they have clearly decreased in my hood. Good, that one is not red-listed :)

28.03.2013 15:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Underside needed to be 100% sure. If the band on its hind wings reaches the margin, then it's Heliconius erato, if not, then Heliconius melpomene. Waiting for the underside pic.

28.03.2013 14:50, Peter Khramov:

And in the photo appeared red stamp: Apple of discord.

28.03.2013 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, don't even think of hunt! Will go to jail!))

28.03.2013 14:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Svetlana, thanks. Maybe, you will advise something if it takes a go. May I have a look at your website?

28.03.2013 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He has made a problematic one:Antirrhea philoctetesbased on the definition of the author.

28.03.2013 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Soon (as the snow melts away) we can see these red-listed "glammy jackets" in large masses:)

28.03.2013 14:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Ira, when Alexander chё here? Here his point of view is. 03.21.2013 13:47 Alexander Zhakov:

Alas, Yuri, I have repeatedly expressed my opinion and a lot written on this page. three participant discussion came to one the most probable opinion, one does not come to what is not, but against it.You are right on this particular photo can be no doubt, therefore, must make a determination (a type defined inaccurate). With great respect to your opinion. Zhakov
As for you, you're very kind to say that to be the truth (no offense) But if you refer to it, I have a question for both. What is it you find that opinions have changed.It would be desirable for a variety of point of view and hear Alexander

28.03.2013 14:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry says right: A. avernus is a subspecies, Antirrhea philoctetes avernus Hopffer, 1874.

28.03.2013 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, just a bit ragged.

27.03.2013 22:45, Peter Khramov:

The world gloom prevailed. Sentiment wandered defeatist.

27.03.2013 22:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it is too early to say whether or not I'll come: I do not know exactly. And the more time the end of March. I can only delay the work. And so, with pleasure will come if the break (this is unlikely, but as the saying goes, "you never know). Dmitry three copies.Acraea necodadid you wait until-now :). God grant that happened .

27.03.2013 21:22, Lev Bely:

Dmitry, I am keep looking at eratos and it feels like they all have this yellow band on hind wings and this (band) always reaches wing margin at least in a dust, and the very band seems to be shaped as an entire semi-circle, whilst melpomenes have this band interrupted and not reaching wing margin, and the band instead looks like two hemispheres. Or not?

27.03.2013 20:49, Lev Bely:

Hencale, khinkali:) It's hecale.

27.03.2013 20:39, Lev Bely:

Glammy jacket:)

27.03.2013 16:56, Peter Khramov:

Okay, updated.

27.03.2013 16:54, Irina Nikulina:

Jura, "not to water it down" and not to repeat, at this point I will not add anything to the discussion. I, like Al. Zhakov, I think that seems to be enough said on this page, and here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21521.By their arguments / reasons I add is nothing, especially in this particular picture (And mind you, no one insists on the accuracy of the determination of the form). Perhaps other panelists still have something to say

27.03.2013 15:38, Yuri Semejkin:

All possible options, such as indicated here, and inaccurate in nature can be transferred to whom that like it. Just me. -So do not understand that. It seems to have a job, where all agree that disk imaging to determine the underside only, at the moment is not enough, that it is necessary to gain materyal, in future, make it possible to determine the background.Yet, going from time to time, without evidentiary talk about anything.
I wish that something, somewhere to move. Maybe all the same arguments lead ...... as you can "water in a mortar to pound"

27.03.2013 15:25, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Yury, as the owner of a website with message board, I can say that the main thing is to section properly future board. Later it's just a minute thing to join a new section if needed.

27.03.2013 14:51, Yuri Semejkin:

No movement here, before folks seemed like interested in contributing, what's now? Just me and Petr are "sparring". Moderators simply let it go. Hey, where are you all? You-hooo.

27.03.2013 14:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is female.

27.03.2013 14:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Ypsolopha blandella (Christoph,1882), identified by M. Ponomarenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Science FEB RAS.

27.03.2013 14:20, Yuri Semejkin:

No objections.

27.03.2013 14:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Er, yes at what all this. There would be food, and there are butterflies.

27.03.2013 14:10, Yuri Semejkin:

I am against (at least for now) transfer. Or me and everyone. who participated in the discussions, you can not ask? Er, where are your arguments?

27.03.2013 12:43, Irina Nikulina:

By Celastrina ladonides, Peter. Before he finally agreed)

27.03.2013 12:04, Peter Khramov:

Anuga or not, eh, guys?

27.03.2013 12:04, Peter Khramov:

Has anybody anything more to say?

27.03.2013 12:03, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. So inaccurate something to someone?

27.03.2013 12:00, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

27.03.2013 12:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.03.2013 11:59, Peter Khramov:

To melete "uncertain".

27.03.2013 11:57, Peter Khramov:

Alrighty.

27.03.2013 11:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.03.2013 11:56, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to.

27.03.2013 11:56, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry! hencale or not?

27.03.2013 11:55, Peter Khramov:

Done.

27.03.2013 11:55, Peter Khramov:

Is it female, eh?

27.03.2013 11:54, Peter Khramov:

This is done too.

27.03.2013 11:54, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

27.03.2013 11:53, Peter Khramov:

Doris moved too.

27.03.2013 11:53, Peter Khramov:

Sapho! Moved.

27.03.2013 11:52, Peter Khramov:

Guys, if you agree, please add the species or synonym...

27.03.2013 11:51, Peter Khramov:

Ok, we're not so white-gloved to neglect adding the location ourselves...

27.03.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.03.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

27.03.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.03.2013 11:48, Peter Khramov:

Will be male.

27.03.2013 11:47, Peter Khramov:

Common!

27.03.2013 10:35, Peter Khramov:

Right, now female.

27.03.2013 9:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Common Heliconius erato demophoon.

27.03.2013 9:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

27.03.2013 9:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pardon me, this is female, males are grey.

27.03.2013 8:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hamadryas feronia (Linnaeus, 1758).

27.03.2013 8:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hamadryas feronia (Linnaeus, 1758).

27.03.2013 3:09, Peter Khramov:

Citizens kinds of admin or make a new push foty the old and ...

27.03.2013 1:56, Peter Khramov:

So the software is ready to go. Along with that the comment system will also get an update that includes cross-linking inside the website, text editing (bold italics etc.), editing of recently uploaded comments (yours, of course), attaching photos without uploading them in the gallery and also hyperlinking to pics on other websites. If you need anything more, now it's the right time to share your thoughts.

27.03.2013 1:13, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, the answer obradoval- hence oreas slowly conquering new spaces (not just Golda;)! Coming soon to your Red Book have to be amended) (This is what Bush the country populated Celastrina filipjevi, not surprised they are settled more easily)

27.03.2013 0:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

27.03.2013 0:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.03.2013 23:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Belyaeva answer:
Hello Yuri!

Apparently, your photos, really, Celastrina oreas. In other, much to the surprise of her discovery of the boat. garden does not have to. In the vicinity of Vladivostok widely introduced into the culture Prinsep (Prinsepia sinensis), fodder plant and its caterpillars Celastrina filipjevi.We recently put a little acoustic Prinsep at our cottage on the satellite, so the next year after planting, he was settled Celastrina filipjevi.

Sincerely, Eugene.

26.03.2013 23:23, Irina Nikulina:

Jura, in my opinion, their resemblance does not provide explicitly define the type of image, and given the place of shooting, the small number of species oreas and more difficult survival on artificial planting Prinsep, I'd rather stop at Filipeva, given that the Botanical Garden of the population of a large and sustainability. But wait, what will EA.Belyaev (repeat - example Goldia pacifica very impressive, maybe oreas not only in the Ussuri reserve?))

26.03.2013 23:08, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

26.03.2013 23:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.03.2013 16:29, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, is the window "The number of another pic of this specimen" seen on this page or not?

26.03.2013 12:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Er, I do not understand duck. In your opinion, it is still Filipeva

26.03.2013 12:34, Alex Dumchus:

Underside to photo #21576.

26.03.2013 12:33, Alex Dumchus:

Underside to #21574 photo.

25.03.2013 22:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved.
P. S. Now having some troubles with PC, nearest time I'll update that and start sorting out recently posted pics.

25.03.2013 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Under police escort.

25.03.2013 14:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No, he does not come. Look.

25.03.2013 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, how not. Basil which year you eager attendants some give. And finally - give up! Can you imagine?

25.03.2013 14:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not ranovoto-whether the Kazakh Altai go?

25.03.2013 14:08, Stan Korb:

And I probably will. If you do not fall into the Katon-Karagayskiy National Park.

25.03.2013 13:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I mean in the community. On the other hand, apparently none.

25.03.2013 12:31, Peter Khramov:

Yeah Right hangs in the block are much higher: -)

25.03.2013 11:36, Alex Dumchus:

So read the label attached. Literally Pazale euron, Dabaiuan, Mt.3000 m, Lushan, W-Sschuan. Second, comparing this to mandarinus (sadly don't have tamerlan), there are some clear differences like Euron is larger, its wings are not as much striped, the topside of its hind wings has serrations not waves.

25.03.2013 8:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is necessary to stick this topic up, not to lose

25.03.2013 8:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pazala is quite a painful genus. Can't see clearly distinctive features. Why do you reckon it eurous, not mandarinus or tamerlan?

25.03.2013 8:12, Alex Dumchus:

I was wrong, this is Graphium eurous.

25.03.2013 7:16, Evgeny Komarov:

It is tempting! That's just the whole of April is already painted. The second weekend of the month we leave Volgograd branch of RER in Archeda-Don Sands, and the end of April a two-week leave in the Ustyurt region in Beyneu! And in between, alas, work prinosyaschay money.

25.03.2013 0:20, Peter Khramov:

For the time being we know that Svyatoslav Knyazev and Yuri Semeykin not come without a valid reason: -)

24.03.2013 22:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How is it going? Has anyone come?

24.03.2013 21:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is male.

24.03.2013 21:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Graphium endochus.

24.03.2013 21:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Opsiphanes cassina, curious colour form.

24.03.2013 21:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Didn't look at the label. If it's from Central America, then Colobura dirce no variants.

24.03.2013 21:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Graphium mandarinus "uncertain".

24.03.2013 21:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nah, that's Asian one.

24.03.2013 21:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Graphium endochus.

24.03.2013 21:21, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, the site A. I know for a long time Nedoluzhko even made it here a week ago, the list of literature at number 97, there is a lot of useful. So that is where both are represented copper-butterfly (Filipeva - http://www.treefrog.ru/photo/category/13-phil.html and Article MM Omelko about both - http://www.treefrog.ru/ floraandfauna / item / 21-phil02.html). Shodstvo- !!

24.03.2013 20:46, Alex Dumchus:

Graphium endochus.

24.03.2013 19:28, Alex Dumchus:

Antirrhea avernus.

24.03.2013 19:24, Alex Dumchus:

Morphotaenaris schoenbergi.

24.03.2013 19:18, Alex Dumchus:

The label reads something weird like Moramanga, the invoice does Madagascar.

24.03.2013 18:57, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, no one here can see the original filename and the name of the species save the author and administrator.

24.03.2013 18:47, Peter Khramov:

Why not added hte location Madagascar?

24.03.2013 18:37, Alex Dumchus:

Madagascar.

24.03.2013 18:35, Alex Dumchus:

Will add tomorrow.

24.03.2013 18:34, Alex Dumchus:

So #21571 and #21572 are the same species?

24.03.2013 18:32, Alex Dumchus:

Will add tomorrow.

24.03.2013 17:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Madagascar?

24.03.2013 17:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heliconius sapho.

24.03.2013 17:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heliconius doris.

24.03.2013 17:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pereute charops.

24.03.2013 17:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The white, Pereute charops.

24.03.2013 17:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catonephele numilia female.

24.03.2013 17:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Genitalia dissection. Assume Antirrhea philoctetes.

24.03.2013 17:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Underside needed.

24.03.2013 17:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Underside needed.

24.03.2013 17:42, Lev Bely:

Heliconius melpomene?

24.03.2013 17:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Siproeta stelenes.

24.03.2013 17:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hamadryas laodamia male.

24.03.2013 17:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hamadryas laodamia.

24.03.2013 17:24, Lev Bely:

Heliconius hecale zuleika?

24.03.2013 17:17, Lev Bely:

Heliconius doris?

24.03.2013 17:14, Lev Bely:

Heliconius sapho?

24.03.2013 14:35, Alex Dumchus:

It's apparently called similarly to morpho, male abdomens should be removed to prevent hind wings from greasing.

24.03.2013 2:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Why reacted to oreas? But somehow I have it not fit into the other. Copper-butterfly. I found in the internet that's kind of like like http://www.treefrog.ru/photo/category/14-oreas.html
The picture took off.

24.03.2013 1:02, Irina Nikulina:

It would be very good. interesting! Ure, I just wanted to understand - why this photo you reacted to oreas? What's in it such, indicating definitely this kind? And yet you were the night, another article found. MM Omelko, NV Omelko "Breeding and maintenance need of protection of insects as one of the directions of their preservation."It is there including these two kinds - Filipeva and oreas. And noting that, unlike Filipeva, view oreas "on small plantations printsepe ... not always survive," it is much more difficult to dissolve in the arts. planting ..That has begun to doubt about the botanical garden, the more it's your local entomologists write about 2 habitat ... But the example of Goldia pacifica, I agree, is impressive, I remember all the details, kind of really long considered a narrow local. But in the case oreas confused rigid peg to the Prinsep ...

23.03.2013 23:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Ira, and why should they be the only 2 places? Remember the story of the Pacific marshmallow, which was known only to the Blue Ridge.
Dr. Example: On the tracks of marshmallows, -vezde write and say what they have to look at height, on top of the tree. But I found them at a height of 1 m from the ground
With regard to the file. Well-il, I will cast his Belyaev.If he is not on a business trip, then we hope to find the time to respond

23.03.2013 18:10, Irina Nikulina:

Jura question - why oreas? Let me explain where doubts. Maybe I do not know the latest data, but in the latest version of the Red Book of Primorsky Krai in the article on copper-butterfly oreas (compiled by Belyaev EA) indicated that this species in Primorye significantly numerically smaller than Filipeva ,.and you've only known two kinds of permanent colony on the territory of the Ussuri Nature Reserve (in the river valleys and Komarovka Suvorovka). In the botanical garden there are only a steady population of blues Filipeva on art. Prinsep plantings. Maybe it is in the photo, Celastrina filipjevi? (And I do not really understand about any dock islands you write on the page type Celastrina oreas)

23.03.2013 18:08, Peter Khramov:

Good idea about glossary and no-reply topics, should be added later, though it's not about message board but rather some independent sections like "Glossary" or such no-reply features as to species or photo comments, not only ones on a message board.

23.03.2013 17:57, Irina Nikulina:

Met it just once in Ussuriysk forest reserve)

23.03.2013 17:04, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

I mean the flight time, not the shot date. Read in full there: http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/8616.

23.03.2013 16:58, Peter Khramov:

Anatoly, if you meant the shot date, it can be changed in your personal account in the section "Uploaded images".
Note to all: that bug concerning large size (pix) photos is fixed, now you may freely upload 3000х3000 pics (just not hundred at a time, ok?).

23.03.2013 16:50, Anatoliy Kuzmin:

I was wrong before about the species, adding flight time and colours, I should have specified flight time, that was the bug caused by the pic size 3000х3000.

23.03.2013 16:39, Peter Khramov:

Right. Now it's ok.

23.03.2013 16:11, Peter Khramov:

That was the inner website bug. Anatoly's reuploading the pic now and after that we'll move the comments to the latest pic version.

23.03.2013 13:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi. Quite rare species.

23.03.2013 7:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is thus Melanitis phedima.

23.03.2013 7:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Melanitis phedima.

23.03.2013 4:30, Yuri Semejkin:

As for sections, few more to add: 1. Lepidopterological glossary for to seek for some term and its meaning;
2. No-reply topics just for information or something to add if one has to.

23.03.2013 3:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Now seen.

23.03.2013 2:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO Rapala pheretima.

23.03.2013 2:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO, Pieris dulcinea/melete.

23.03.2013 2:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Junonia orithya.

23.03.2013 2:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Junonia orithya.

23.03.2013 2:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Why, it's instead Nymphalis xanthomelas! ;) And I clearly see where it's lost, flew to Nizhny Novgorod at feet to that glammy "jacket" and further to the Butterfly House.... :)))

23.03.2013 2:20, Peter Khramov:

Eh. And so it happens.

23.03.2013 2:19, Peter Khramov:

Hm, everything works good on my side.

23.03.2013 1:35, Yuri Semejkin:

Again pic's unseen.

23.03.2013 1:34, Yuri Semejkin:

The pic lost again.

23.03.2013 1:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Neither can I see. It's in the section "Photo Gallery updates" but not here.

22.03.2013 22:58, Yury Sokolkov:

I also will not be from 18 to 23 April in the food reserve in Belgorod shoot primroses and possibly the first butterflies.

22.03.2013 22:30, Irina Nikulina:

It was here... lost somewhere) I thought it's only my bug again)

22.03.2013 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Where's the pic gone? Was it originally medium size or some bug?

22.03.2013 22:17, Peter Khramov:

What a nicey.

22.03.2013 22:01, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Oh, what zamanuhu planted ... Never in Nizhny was not ... But I'm just at this time (from 14 to 26 April) will be in the mountains of northeastern Thailand to climb. One joy that in addition to its core pure botanical interest will be able to meet (and ideally - to take) at least a few tropical butterflies.Through the eyes, I saw them in the past trips much more than managed to capture on a photo. And I hope that none of the local fauna, this time I will not bite, I was too lucky on this matter ...

22.03.2013 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Right!

22.03.2013 21:30, Peter Khramov:

There is a proposal to meet, get to know who else is offline stranger, talk to okoloentomologicheskie threads at the same time wishing to exchange material, and I'll take entomological equipment, to whom he had promised. In general, the cultural time.
Time - the middle or the second half of April.Previously - the weather is just too grim, and time to get ready / willing to prepare a little. Later - a wholesale beginning of the season, many will not before. Orienting 13 (14), or 20 (21) numbers as This Saturday / Sunday, handy for working on a standard day schedule. Although it may encounter in everyday life.The exact date will be discussing with all those who will gather for a meeting beforehand.
Now place. By prior agreement Moscow has been sent to the bath as a variant of the vulgar and soulless. But as soon as all roads lead to Rome, it is strongly move away from her will be difficult for technical reasons. Therefore - Nizhny Novgorod.Strong local entomological diaspora, only 4 hours on the "Sapsan" from Moscow, at the same time you can walk along kulyutorno is interesting, and in some places and a beautiful city.
I think it should go at least a couple of days / one night, to encounter and catch, and go take a walk, a horse and dusty yourself not to feel.However, extreme athletes can turn faster, but fans of thoughtful holiday - a bit late on a little longer.
How to get to the city

Steam

From Moscow or the Moscow: the most convenient train "Sapsan" - quickly and, by the standards of Russian Railways, comfortable. The locomotive departs daily from the Kursk railway station at 6.45 am with the arrival of 10.40 (handy if you go on Saturday and on the same day to meet) and at 19.30 with arrival at 23.25 (good for entry into the hotel in the evening so as not to get up early). In addition, there is a "Petrel" (16.45-21.25) and a bunch of night trains for those who prefer to sleep on the road.
From Peter: the same "Sapsan" (but the evening version) plus a night train.UP: Now I look, it seems, a direct "Peregrine Falcon" from Peter now there is, but only interchange with interfacing 50 minutes in Moscow. Pancake.
From the east: I pay attention that it is not necessary to go through Moscow, if you are from the eastern part of Russia. And many of the train from the eastern regions to Moscow will just across Nizhny Novgorod.

Aircraft

In Nizhny Novgorod fly regular flights from Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, Chelyabinsk, Astrakhan, and several cities in Russia and the former Soviet Union.

Extreme

Of course! It can be reached by intercity buses! Hitchhiker! I.Attention! Hare on the chaise trains through Vladimir and Vyazniki.
Approximate prices
"Peregrine Falcon" from Moscow ~ 1600 rub.
Double ~ 3000-4000 rubles. And single too.
One-bedroom apartment ~ 2000 rubles.
If you settle a large crowd, the money will go symbolically.If you settle for one person in a pleasant room - they can go out and not so symbolic. Accordingly, this issue was discussed.
You may be able to grab a couple of free rooms in a good hotel. But this year, it is not so likely, as in the past, or the year before, when we ventured into this business for the first time, because in my mind keep, but. Links
http://pass.rzd.ru/ - train schedule online Railways
http://rasp.yandex.ru/ - a schedule of everything
http://www.airportnn.ru/ - Nizhny Novgorod Airport
http://www.ozon.travel/ - search for tickets and hotels
http://www.101hotels.ru/main/cities/Nizhniy_Novgorod - Hotel Lower
http://www.booking.com/region/ru/nizhny-novgorod.en-us.html?sid=629622304d972b6216cecccc592d8dbe;dcid=1 - Also hotels Lower
http://maps.yandex.ru/?text=%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F%2C%20%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C%2C%20%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%B6%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9%20%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4&sll=44.002258%2C56.323922&ll=43.888855%2C56.288676&spn=2.084 656% 2C0.678234 & z = 10 & l = map - City On Yandex.Maps

Those who pre-finished - write here or mail, please call the phone. Who has any questions - ask, we will discuss. Dy, DJ, c'mon!

22.03.2013 20:58, Igor Sakhno:

Isn't this N. xanthomelas?

21.03.2013 21:18, Irina Nikulina:

Lev, agree. I'd call it demure graceful) Pity it's rare. I thought I could later take better pictures, but saw it just once)

21.03.2013 19:26, Lev Bely:

Amazing moth.

21.03.2013 16:44, Irina Nikulina:

Petr, this may be closed and moved to Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi, I found on the species description page that Callophrys ferrea = Ahlbergia ferrea are Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi synonyms. Though there is still place for doubt.
The website by Eduard and Oleg Berlov "1000 SIBERIAN BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS" has Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi (Kindermann, 1853) and Ahlbergia ferrea (Butler, 1866) as two different species, and the latter has this note "the specimen is from Japan, to compare" (http://catocala.narod.ru/lyc009.html and http://catocala.narod.ru/lyc036.html). Other sources also mention Callophrys (Ahlbergia) ferrea as a species from Japan and Korea. Can anyone competent clear the thing out?

21.03.2013 13:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alas, Yuri, I have repeatedly expressed my opinion and a lot written on this page. three participant discussion came to one the most probable opinion, one does not come to what is not, but against it. You are right on this particular photo can be no doubt, therefore, must make a determination (a type defined inaccurate).With great respect to your opinion. Zhakov

21.03.2013 11:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexander justify their point of view (without bush) and particular snapshot

21.03.2013 0:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, like enough.

21.03.2013 0:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Down on a given page there is "Butterflies in nature" link, better to check the lowest pic.

20.03.2013 23:53, Yuri Semejkin:

I would not tolerate, at least for now. Like all came to the conclusion that of information in this case is not enough

20.03.2013 18:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter and the transferred. :)

20.03.2013 18:41, Peter Khramov:

Ok Yury, done.

20.03.2013 17:27, Peter Khramov:

Today, the English version and moved after the Russian.

20.03.2013 16:06, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, then this one may be moved as well to Celastrina filipjevi.

20.03.2013 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Celastrina filipjevi.

20.03.2013 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Peter. Online "screen will return," to show that fixed a.

20.03.2013 13:13, Irina Nikulina:

Ure, yesterday began to write their opinions to your answer to Peter. And today is ready to support you - it Celastrina filipjevi = Maslowskia filipjevi. The Botanical Garden in a radius of about 2 to 3 meters from the large number Prinsep Celastrina filipjevi. Butterflies of this species do not usually fly off from the undergrowth Prinsep more than 3m.According to Belyaev, "The Botanical Garden-Institute FEB RAS and arboretum Gorno-taiga Station, Far Eastern Branch of RAS on small plantings ploskosemyannika freely migrating females copper-butterfly Filipeva were based quite viable colonies of species."And judging by the date of shooting, is a butterfly of the first generation (flying from late June until mid-July) before the end of the flight of, you're right.

20.03.2013 12:47, Peter Khramov:

MOVED by Acronicta maxima to Parapsestis lichenea. Basil, in cases when it is determined nezaergistrirovan on the site, put the definition of who has brought the Old relevant to your site. For this foty - you.
ZY Perens comments from species to fote since they relate to a particular photo is, not species.

20.03.2013 12:44, Yuri Semejkin:

If you focus on the core underside and nature spots I would have brought it to the Maslowskia filipjevi Riley. What confuses? Kurentsov writes: The underside of both sexes silvery white ..... In this case, about the underside do not say. What though of nothing says, along with a painting, fly, including together with silver and white (Chinese ploskosemyannik near growing).In general, it seems that such a hue as the image appears on the old butterflies before they finish Flight.
In general, for a number of species, probably it is necessary to have a top and underside of the same individuals and then maybe we can talk (or not say) about the diagnosis only at the top or underside.

20.03.2013 12:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No biggies, won't take long. Month ago I already caught something, just one month to go.

20.03.2013 11:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same is here: now minus 7C and lots of snow, forecasters don't seem to promise increasing temperatures till the end of March. With all that butterfly hunt will be possible not than in a month........... Sad.

20.03.2013 10:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No any thaw here. Was at the weekend, but now it's minus 8 C. I saw that was xanthomelas back then and already told those guys of their poor qualification.

20.03.2013 8:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why.... There is in the very beginning a wild overwintered xanthomelas, seems that is the main heroine. Want to stand up for journalists: they apparently aren't interested in ubiquitous species. But why did they call it painted lady?:)
Dmitry, seems it's a thaw you've got there? I haven't seen any N. xanthomelas yet. Hopefully soon: they will fly out in masses :)

20.03.2013 8:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Feel jealous! Yes, we have it here!

20.03.2013 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Yury, what's your opinion?

20.03.2013 0:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Having other ladonides surely identified this butterfly evokes serious doubt.

19.03.2013 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, well, you transfer the last of its final.
Stale it under a false name :)

19.03.2013 19:04, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Spotted today Anuga indigofera in the catalogue. Might be mine as well some Anuga?

19.03.2013 18:22, Irina Nikulina:

Quietly jealous aside and start looking below our feet thoroughly :)))

19.03.2013 18:05, Irina Nikulina:

The picture is not quite good but very informative) I think there can be no doubt of that the ID is correct like that was on there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/6380, since only Celastrina ladonides larvae (of four possible species discussed there) feed on Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. and Sophora flavescens Sol. In this photo Celastrina ladonides female is laying eggs just on Lespedeza!

19.03.2013 16:11, Yuri Semejkin:

I think it still looks more of Pieris bryoniae. Here Berlov's pic, just compare http://babochki.narod.ru/pi24pr.html.
The same strong veins and large "median cell" on sides of its head. As for the very cell, might call it wrong, please correct.

19.03.2013 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Look what a sparkling life they live in Nizhny Novgorod, not the ones you do in your moscows.

19.03.2013 12:23, Irina Nikulina:

Time to add the new subspecies Vanessa cardui ssp. nizhegorodskaya (Dusya) that throws herself at feet))

19.03.2013 12:22, Irina Nikulina:

It pleases) Alexander, I note - it would be nice if, and under other "unidentified object" set records). A lot of issues ... I understand that the Far Eastern species are not too familiar to most, but it is more pleasant to find the answers)

19.03.2013 4:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Agree. :) Where only they found such a heroine... ;)

19.03.2013 0:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina fully sogdasen that forum will save a record in terms of comment. :))

18.03.2013 22:46, Irina Nikulina:

Do not give rest to this photo). Ure, the new guide: "Fauna of the Ussuri taiga", edited by AE Vrischa which acquired, flying away from you, this kind of early spring is uniquely defined as Celastrina ladonides (copper-butterfly ladonopodobnaya). This atlas you probably have (including "Flora" is exactly))), see pages 116-117. Photo, by the way, Yuri Chistyakov

18.03.2013 22:25, Irina Nikulina:

Yury, want to share some interesting find concerning differences between Pieris melete and Pieris dulcinea. The publication "Diurnal Lepidoptera of Priargunsky district" by Novosibirsk entomologists V. V. Dubatolov and O. E. Kosterin reads that Pieris dulcinea's back black spot on its forewing is as well emphasized as the front one, whilst Pieris melete has that back black spot quite more emphasized. That was the description of Pieris melete orientis. Can't comment as I am not a pro, just wanted to share.
Also there was that "optimistic" remark: "The systematics of the mountain butterflies of the genus Pieris relative to P. napi (Linnaeus, 1758) remains one of the hardest and unsolved problems in studying the palaearctic Papilionoidea"...

18.03.2013 22:23, Lev Bely:

Can you not agree there are real, alive tigers watching you in Arbat street:)

18.03.2013 22:10, Peter Khramov:

No, many are good people. Few are good animalists (in a grumpy voice).

18.03.2013 21:43, Lev Bely:

:) Many are lovely animalists.

18.03.2013 21:36, Irina Nikulina:

Lev, thank you! Wonderful greeting through the ages. Lucky their father entomologist!)

18.03.2013 13:33, Lev Bely:

There are also Scott sisters http://lepidoptera.pro/community/9858, greeting from 19th century: http://australianmuseum.net.au/Scott-Sisters-Butterfly-and-Moth-Drawings.

18.03.2013 11:21, Peter Khramov:

So the napi has that as well. They say that the melete has it more and darker from its topside and instead lighter/fewer from the underside. Can't see though the distinctive difference looking at photos...

18.03.2013 11:04, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, let's admit that if that was really painted lady, the total impression wouldn't be that complete. Here we have a perfect composition of the event, and the book that was used for identifying, and the "correct" ID, and the butterflies' "life in paradise" in the Nizhny Novgorod Butterfly House. Nizhny Novgorod TV rules, what to say. To memories! To speak seriously, it's a big shame to the Nizhny Novgorod Butterfly House, clearly they made this wrong identification, neither the TV host nor the heroine...

18.03.2013 9:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Question to all. According to Kourentzov the underside's venation of both hind and forewings has dark brown or greenish lurid fringe, the species is Pieris napi. Here we have P. melete. Anyone can comment why it's melete and what's the difference?

18.03.2013 4:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

No, you are the painted lady! ;)

17.03.2013 18:34, Irina Nikulina:

So glad to know I'm not the one having such a "nostalgia"! )) Keep them carefully too. Lev, thanks for the links, amazing drawings! Looked again through all the issues with pleasure. Some time ago I started collecting butterfly drawings, not so many quite a masterpiece. Fond of Carl Brenders' artwork, seems to be widely known: http://gallerix.ru/storeroom/863202494/, the gallery in full, lepidoptera included.

17.03.2013 15:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The words to the first issue written by E. M. Antonova: http://jugan2.narod.ru/antonova.html.
The whole set of 16 postcards cost 54 kopecks. Kept the first issue from childhood (nostalgia).

17.03.2013 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This pic should be moved to Parapsestis lichenea (the species's already added) and signed with "Identified by Oleg Pekarsky", whilst the species it was previosly linked to should be kept unillustrated since it's a different species that can be illustrated after a while. I moved this pic to A. maxima by mistake, relied on the author's comment.

17.03.2013 13:51, Lev Bely:

Years ago the Moscow publishing house “Izobrazitelnoye iskusstvo” brought out a series of butterfly-themed postcards in cooperation with artist Leonid Varsanofievich Aristov. Aristov is originally from Karpunikha village, Gorkov (now Nizhny Novgorod) region, graduated from the Gerasimov Institute of Cinematography where he had to interrupt his studies to take part in the Great Patriotic War and serve in the intelligence, later then he worked as a director at the Russian animation studio “Soyuzmultfilm” and co-founded the Russian TV film studio “Studio Ekran”. He also did make wonderful drawings of butterflies and moths.
“Babochki. First issue” and “Babochki. Seventh issue” series are available on the website “Evolution without limits”, http://sivatherium.narod.ru, as well as other animalistic series by the “Izobrazitelnoye iskusstvo”.
“Babochki. First issue”, http://sivatherium.narod.ru/postcard/baboch01/baboch01.htm.
“Babochki. Seventh issue”, http://sivatherium.narod.ru/postcard/baboch07/baboch07.htm.

Chalkhill Blue Polyommatus coridon, L. Aristov

Broad-bordered Bee Hawk-moth Hemaris fuciformis, L. Aristov

Marbled White Melanargia galathea, L. Aristov

Siberian silkmoth Dendrolimus superans sibiricus, L. Aristov

Hermit Chazara briseis, L. Aristov

Yellow Tiger Moth Arctia flavia, L. Aristov

17.03.2013 11:31, Peter Khramov:

Ok, got it. I can just add one more dropbox in the species characteristics. But people should add info to have that dropbox active, and such info could be provided with reference or just be a personal message. The thing is that people don't add any info) Despite there is a special link on the description page of an each species. Anyway, we can try.

17.03.2013 5:14, Yuri Semejkin:

"Thus if the specimen can be identified at least to genus, it will be moved to the genus."
The answer is not exact. I didn't propose to pile up all the species identified to the genus (see above). Repeating once again, I offer just to separate those species that require genitalia examination for sure ID. This looks much simpler, visible and handier with all subsequent pluses and so on.

16.03.2013 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pah-you: do not go there rashly posted yesterday: view Acronicta (Acronicta) maxima Moore 1881. not removed.

16.03.2013 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Incorrect an author: this is actuallyParapsestis licheneaof Drepanidae. Yesterday fought on the forum here has created a form (see. The very first post). Definition Oleg trust her completely and have to move. Do not scoop it, however :)

16.03.2013 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Something I do not catch up. It all comments to fote at all or what?

16.03.2013 22:05, Peter Khramov:

As for the photos on this page, if you do insist on this is really an example of disguise, please send me the original file and I'll make a wee editing since like now nothing seen.
As for the photos #9795 and #9794, please stop being childish, we've ended that discussion year and a half ago there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9794, so those two pics will stay as I reckon them interesting from the photographic point of view.

16.03.2013 21:50, Peter Khramov:

"why this or that butterfly/moth identified like that" is talked over on the species photo page. Distinctive features are discussed on the species description page.
Web sources are added to the thread "Entomological toolkit: useful links on lepidoptera and more", but ok, they can be optionally moved to the message board. Generally, the catalogue of links is a catalogue, not a thread, though such threads poorly do exist on message boards since their owners just lack good catalogue engine. Or they do have but don't use that.
Books and stuff would better be catalogued too, anyway for the beginning we can have them listed on the message board.
As for some special section for trouble species, doesn't seem to concern much the very message board, but this thing is going to be solved with a new feature which will allow to link photos not only with species but to other taxa as well. Thus if the specimen can be identified at least to genus, it will be moved to the genus.
Anyone may start a thread right now, just there are no lots of people eager to. Maybe the message board will increase the number of those.
So for now we have next sections to include: photography, recommendations, discussions, off-topic. That's clear. Not clear what sections concerning lepidoptera we need beyond all the existing threads that already cover species, photo and other taxa discussions. Waiting for your thoughts.

16.03.2013 20:37, Peter Khramov:

Shocked.

16.03.2013 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Marten reigns.

16.03.2013 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females.

16.03.2013 16:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, Leo. It seems to happen. The picture number 59 and 60
http://bit.ly/Xfl95Q

16.03.2013 16:56, Lev Bely:

...thought the painted lady and headed right to Bolshaya Pokrovskaya street in Nizhny Novgorod. Where it was caught red-handed, naturally.
Butterflies flew to Nizhny Novgorod (in Russian)

16.03.2013 16:00, Lev Bely:


The Committee on Rare and Endangered Wildlife Species of the Khabarovsk region advised that the next three relict species would be put on the Khabarovsk Red List — Sphecodina caudata, Shijimiaeoides divina and Protohermes martynovae, reported RIA Novosti citing the Khabarovsk Krai Government latest press release.
The Red List of Khabarovsk Krai includes 127 animal species, 167 plant and fungal species.
“Experts proposed endangered status for three Lepidoptera species as those Sphecodina caudata, Shijimiaeoides divina and Protohermes martynovae. All three have been discovered in the region recently, yet poorly studied, deemed as relict and are endangered,” — reads the press release.
It was also proposed to put the yellow-throated marten on The Red List of Khabarovsk Krai.
RIA Novosti, http://ria.ru
Photo: S. caudata, http://tpittaway.tripod.com

16.03.2013 15:46, Lev Bely:

Bulky link can be reduced here http://bitly.com/shorten/. Very comfortably.

16.03.2013 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We must move: even found one Chinese website it as Parapsestis lichenea: link not give why it happens again kilometer.

16.03.2013 3:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yep, I've got the whole genus spread like that.

16.03.2013 2:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hände hoch :)))

16.03.2013 1:38, Yuri Semejkin:

1. Species discussions. (namely, why this or that butterfly/moth identified like that. Any doubt and arguments are also to be there).
2. Recommended web sources (authentic and 100% reliable).
3. New books and other publications. Where and what published, worthful or not. Where and how to get, prices.
Overall, that's all.
P. S. Petr, there are species that can be surely identified only after the detailed examination of genitalia as it's said. Even we have such here on the website, randomly classified. What if make some special section and move them all there from undetermined? To have them all in one place, identified at least to genus, then some eager enthusiast may come and try to find some differences, eventually may find some marking feature, spot, streak, uncommon wing curve etc. Gradually some species can be finally identified. Along with board discussions...
The very board sections won't take much space. Some of them will be probably nearly inactive. Anyway, there should be a message board for anyone to be able to start a thread...

16.03.2013 0:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Female, by the way.

16.03.2013 0:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I won't upload the photo of a spread thing before the photos #9795 and #9794 go to waste.

16.03.2013 0:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The background is quite decent, clearly seen how the butterfly disguises.

15.03.2013 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Please upload when it's done. I'll keep this photo until there are no other, but it should be eventually changed with anything of a better quality.

15.03.2013 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, yes, it is difficult. Type I drove here: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/search/detail.dsml?TaxonNo=57606.0&UserID=&UserName=&&listPageURL=list%2edsml%3fOriginal%5fAuthorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Current%5fgenus%3dParapsestis%26Current%5ftribeqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26sort%3dSCIENTIFIC%255fNAME%255fon%255fcard%26SCIENTIFIC%5fNAME%5fon%5fcardqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Current%5fsubfamilyqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Current%5fsuperfamilyqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Current%5ffamilyqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Distribqtype%3dcontains%26Current%5fgenusqtype%3dstarts%2bwith&searchPageURL=indexadv%2edsml%3fOriginal%5fAuthorqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Current%5fgenus%3dParapsestis%26Current%5ftribeqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26sort%3dSCIENTIFIC%255fNAME%255fon%255fcard%26SCIENTIFIC%5fNAME%5fon%5fcardqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Current%5fsubfamilyqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Current%5fsuperfamilyqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Current%5ffamilyqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26Distribqtype%3dcontains%26Current%5fgenusqtype%3dstarts%2bwith

15.03.2013 19:26, Andrey Ponomarev:

The holotype and only photo in the internet.
http://www.insecta-web.org/cgi-bin/MWM/db_typen/display.pl?id=4285&t=t_entry&t_type=HT
If I understand the family Thyatiridae, in Fauna Europaea is no such taxa as Parapsestis lichenea.

15.03.2013 19:23, Irina Nikulina:

Thanks, now works)

15.03.2013 19:22, Irina Nikulina:

Callophrys ferrea, perhaps?

15.03.2013 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Parapsestis lichenea
It is necessary to add a subspecies: Parapsestis lichenea splendida Laszlo, G.Ronkay, L.Ronkay & Witt, 2007
Determination type: Oleg Baking.

15.03.2013 18:33, Lev Bely:

Vasily, thanks. So do I see this underside is not one of a red pierrot.

15.03.2013 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Surely not: http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/India%20-%20Talicada%20nyseus.htm.

15.03.2013 18:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thanks. The English version plays good. If put off all the damns, Mexico's heard. Will dig that further.

15.03.2013 18:10, Peter Khramov:

Irina, thanks for the tip. No boot problems should not be. Who is correct.

15.03.2013 18:02, Lev Bely:

This Bannerghatta Butterfly Park is indeed a sinister site. Whilst the staff's cutting down attacking pterodactyls, this spider is just peacefully eating a butterfly, allegedly Red Pierrot, though it looks a bit different. Is the poor thing really Talicada nyseus?

Spider eats butterfly in Bannerghatta Butterfly Park

15.03.2013 17:53, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, thank you for this site was to move much faster. And the photo upload is not impossible ... as it should be?

15.03.2013 17:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now somewhere in 3-4 seconds. Measures the Opera (and through a router with firewall + Antivir). Normal flight.

15.03.2013 16:59, Peter Khramov:

Basil, pinged will be longer than before, more server is not in Moscow. But do not these ms'y braking effect. Here you have much time around the main open?

15.03.2013 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I ping myself:
C: Documents and Settings Admin> ping lepidoptera.ru

Pinging lepidoptera.ru [78.47.90.115] 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 78.47.90.115: the number of bytes = 32 time = 51ms TTL = 56
Reply from 78.47.90.115: the number of bytes = 32 time = 51ms TTL = 56
Reply from 78.47.90.115: the number of bytes = 32 time = 51ms TTL = 56
Reply from 78.47.90.115: the number of bytes = 32 time = 51ms TTL = 56

Ping statistics for 78.47.90.115:
Packets: Sent = 4, received = 4, lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round-trip time in ms:
Minimum = 51msek, maximum = 51 ms, 51 ms average =

15.03.2013 16:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, this is understandable. Just say "with its bell tower" :). Now it works fine in comparison with that-before.

15.03.2013 16:00, Peter Khramov:

What for? Waiting just is not necessary. We check the upload speed of data server, rather than the speed with which they come to you. Providers something everyone is different, there's nothing to do ...

15.03.2013 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The best. But you have to wait eight in the evening hours, when the 'Net from my "favorite" CHECK starts laggy because of the network load.

15.03.2013 15:04, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, nothing changed yet. There was the same Neptis philyra.

15.03.2013 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Well, as the cable?

15.03.2013 14:27, Lev Bely:

Dmitry, check out the video in the English version http://lepidoptera.pro/community/12952, me too can't play it here for some reason.

15.03.2013 12:49, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to "uncertain".

15.03.2013 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.03.2013 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

15.03.2013 12:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as another photo of this specimen.

15.03.2013 12:47, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

15.03.2013 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.03.2013 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

15.03.2013 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.03.2013 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

15.03.2013 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.03.2013 12:45, Peter Khramov:

So any resume?

15.03.2013 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can't be surely identified, but judging by how it's sitting I'd rather bet on some Noctuidae, which are in plenty out there.
See how Thysania agrippina sits.

15.03.2013 8:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Can't play the video?

15.03.2013 1:01, Irina Nikulina:

Those who able keep silent) Whilst enthusiasts trying to identify it extremely suffer from this better half's scream)) Nothing in my mind but some Caligo, say CaligoEurilochus... yet the "critter" looks way too dark ... beautiful though! Experts, don't make us yearn in waiting)

14.03.2013 21:30, Peter Khramov:

To continue there: http://lepidoptera.pro/community/12965.

14.03.2013 21:27, Peter Khramov:

To continue the previous discussion http://lepidoptera.pro/community/12274.
The message board is to be opened soon, so let's think about how it can be sectioned and what sections you'd like to see, say "Butterfly photography", "Distinctions between blues and bluewings" and so on. Once at least one list is ready, it will get opened.

14.03.2013 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I sit at work on 3g actually became more bright. Tomorrow is still at home on the cable check. First impressions are positive.

14.03.2013 18:52, Peter Khramov:

Looks like it's time to make photo tags. Then one could sort out all the water areas...

14.03.2013 18:44, Peter Khramov:

Less than a year, and everything is ready. Write reviews, it was faster or not ...

14.03.2013 2:51, Peter Khramov:

Not until the three had not yet moved. It looks like a few hours of need.

13.03.2013 22:10, Lev Bely:

Let's get to know, who is able:)

13.03.2013 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Refresh C :) And that's true retarding few.

13.03.2013 21:42, Lev Bely:

Buff-tip (Phalera bucephala) moth camouflaged as a broken twig, via @RiverExplorerUK, http://twitter.com/RiverExplorerUK/status/311415344566775808.

13.03.2013 21:30, Irina Nikulina:

))) Thanks! For all the previous posts/videos! Has this "megamoth" a full name?

13.03.2013 21:22, Peter Khramov:

For the sake of expediting the work site, I am now going to transfer it to another hosting. To avoid glitches, please do not ship to the site nothing - no pictures, no comments - while there is a crossing. And it will go to about 3:00 on March 14 in Moscow.As the end - I accomplish your goal, and you can operate in normal mode, but with fewer brakes on the server side.

13.03.2013 20:53, Peter Khramov:

Nice!

13.03.2013 20:43, Lev Bely:

Hilarious video of the couple versus critter. The wife won, as you do. The critter is stunning too.

13.03.2013 16:06, Irina Nikulina:

To the collection... of water areas)) Colias hyale against the Golden Horn Bay in Vladivostok. To Dmitry: I do love interesting backgrounds, which can really enrich the aesthetics of a shot (what's probably not so important for catalogue, still looks nice)), especially if the subject of a photo is shot good. Yet it's more common when you're just too far from pondering the background thing)... not with yellows though.

13.03.2013 15:34, Peter Khramov:

Ok, let's start a collection of water areas! I stocked somewhere the image of Satyrium against the Mediterranean Sea...

13.03.2013 15:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For lovers of backgrounds, see the Indian Ocean in the upper left corner.

13.03.2013 15:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes. Haven't spread yet. Will be spread 100% sure, have no this subspecies in my collection.

13.03.2013 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, did you gather this? Curious to see it spread.

13.03.2013 14:32, Irina Nikulina:

Petr, I'll take this into account.

13.03.2013 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Guys, if you do know the original location of the emersion/gathering, let's write it down in the respective field instead of using shot location. That will be more appropriate.

13.03.2013 13:57, Irina Nikulina:

No secret) Philippines, of course. Luzon Island, can't say surely what's part, alas. They (pupae) are the great travellers)) Philippines — Thailand — Vladivostok — Moscow! Therefore I doubted the emersion would be successful) Yet they all did emerge, you may see these beauties in other photos)

13.03.2013 13:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where are exactly the pupae from, if it's not a secret (country and region)? Philippines for sure.

13.03.2013 13:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thanks for the elaboration.

13.03.2013 12:19, Irina Nikulina:

Dmitry, Vladivostok here means the shot location as well as Moscow for three other images of Atrophaneura kotzebuea raised from the pupae shown above. These pupae are the gift from Southeast Asia, naturally.
By the way, previously added photo of Papilio rumanzovia http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21416 is the same thing, wasn't called attention to.

13.03.2013 10:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'll dissect mine.

13.03.2013 9:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So I did add the species. Let's move it to "uncertain" at least.

13.03.2013 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing to dissect in the souvenir thing:)

13.03.2013 9:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Most probably Melanitis phedima, let's wait for the genitalia dissection.

13.03.2013 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nope:)

13.03.2013 8:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pachliopta kotzebuea in Vladivostok?

13.03.2013 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.03.2013 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

12.03.2013 22:52, Irina Nikulina:

Newborn) Just emerged from the pupa, drying out.

11.03.2013 21:07, Peter Khramov:

Author's name to photo can be easily added on upload in the author's comment field.

11.03.2013 20:45, Peter Khramov:

Yes, which signed as "LA".

11.03.2013 18:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias momea, Boisduval, 1836.

11.03.2013 18:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias momea, Boisduval, 1836.

11.03.2013 18:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tanaecia iapis female.

11.03.2013 18:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Terinos atlita.

11.03.2013 18:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio helenus.

11.03.2013 18:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Terinos atlita.

11.03.2013 18:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Terinos atlita.

11.03.2013 18:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona.

11.03.2013 18:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Catopsilia pomona.

11.03.2013 18:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Atrophaneura varuna.

11.03.2013 18:24, Lev Bely:


The country's first butterfly park spread over 7.5 acres in Bannerghatta National Park, Bangalore, India, is a sweet home for 20 butterfly species, which are in thorough care there. Birds, on the contrary, are not quite welcome guests even as much as they can be killed right on the spot.
Not long ago a few butterfly park visitors witnessed the staff shot down with an air gun a paradise flycatcher (Terpsiphone paradisi) which tried to catch a butterfly. As reported, people's asking not to shoot the bird was ignored.
According to the source, this is not the first case of such a cruel act towards birds that get into the butterfly park.
“The employers of the butterfly park saw the flycatcher catching some butterflies, the only crime this innocent little bird did was to fill its belly by eating butterflies. They could have caught it through the bird net and released it but they immediately shot it with the air gun. I feel that it is insane of zoo keepers to do this. Are they instructed to do so? It looks as if the gun is used for this purpose only. Can't they think of any better alternative? We need to stop this or we are going to lose many birds in that particular region. Can someone take this up with the respective authorities?” said protesting Srikanth VK, wildlife enthusiast and photographer.
Srikanth VK sent the photo of the dead bird taken by Ritesh Singh Siddharth, one of witnesses who tried to hinder the killing.
“The main butterfly park is an enclosed area and birds can’t enter inside. But the breeding area is open and the staff uses air rifles to shoo birds and monkeys away. But that doesn’t mean they are authorised to kill animals and birds in the vicinity. That would be like taking the law in their hands, especially in a place that is meant for the protection of birds and animals,” a source said.
Bannerghatta National Park officials said the incident yet to be sorted out. “I’m not aware of the issue. They must be using air rifles, which make a sound, to drive away birds that come to prey on butterflies. I will check if any birds have been killed, and will address the issue immediately,” said Dr R Raju, BBP executive director.
Citizenmatters.in, http://bangalore.citizenmatters.in, PuneMirror.in, http://www.punemirror.in
Photo: Ritesh Singh Siddharth, http://bangalore.citizenmatters.in
Paradise flycatcher in the Sivalik hills, India

11.03.2013 15:27, Yuri Semejkin:

One more to check: http://www.flickr.com/photos/mushimizu/7559204160/.

11.03.2013 14:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Laos?

11.03.2013 12:30, Irina Nikulina:

))... chained with one crush) Pity sometimes that the gallery isn't designed as one to enable adding exclusive author's name to photos))

11.03.2013 11:18, Lev Bely:

This couple with the background beat 'em all: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9168. Field prisoners.

11.03.2013 10:32, Peter Khramov:

Yep, corrected. Weird, more than one such of a bug detected...

11.03.2013 10:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not moved.

11.03.2013 8:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Here three small discal spots are imho rather apparent.

11.03.2013 8:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Neptis thisbe/Neptis tschetverikovi differ with genitalia.

11.03.2013 8:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'd say this is Neptis philyroides female.

11.03.2013 2:11, Irina Nikulina:

It's been allegedly deemed before as a variation of another similar species, Neptis thisbe most probably.

11.03.2013 2:03, Irina Nikulina:

Me think too not only "dry" photo can enrich the catalogue) should I say again, each photo of poor quality may take its legitimate place of an exclusion before good one is uploaded. Different subject though, not to comment)

11.03.2013 1:55, Peter Khramov:

It's not that much of a catalogue to cut such a nice background) Just the latter mainly occurs to be rubbish, so have to cut it after photographers. If it's not rubbish, I'm for it to be saved with my own two hands. See, what horrors this catalogue includes: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14582. Catalogue it's called.

11.03.2013 1:49, Peter Khramov:

I meant the website... Odd we don't have this catalogued...

11.03.2013 1:43, Irina Nikulina:

Even with the Sea of Japan))) Petr, thanks. I usually cut any background before uploading on this website, which is called "catalogue" and primarily serves as that).. but this time was pity to cut it, good vacation memories of Russky Island)

11.03.2013 1:38, Irina Nikulina:

This is rather ubiquitous species in the Far East along with Neptis sappho. Neptis tshetverikovi, Kurentzov, 1936.

11.03.2013 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Looks nice with the background seen. With sea even better...

11.03.2013 0:39, Peter Khramov:

Bizarre. There is no such on here...

11.03.2013 0:38, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, underside to bring. Didn't forget?

11.03.2013 0:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Yury, afaik Dmitry's still having some trouble with his network, so his pop-ups are rather casual and usually with no special literature on hand.

11.03.2013 0:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Pseudopanthera.

10.03.2013 19:41, Sergei Kotov:

Pseudopanthera macularia (Linnaeus, 1758).

09.03.2013 13:46, Igor Sakhno:

One of a masterpiece!

09.03.2013 8:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis philyra Men.

08.03.2013 15:50, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis tschetverikovi.

08.03.2013 5:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Dmitry, would you please look at http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21256? I reckon these two are the same species, and the streaks look alike. Would be great to hear your opinion, whether I'm right or wrong.

08.03.2013 2:31, Peter Khramov:

So it has already done away back...

08.03.2013 0:07, Igor Sakhno:

Seems better to have it enabled first and then have a detailed dicussion.

07.03.2013 23:04, Lev Bely:



Luggages do vary and may include lot of things unimaginable to be carried — immense sofas, medieval marble mortars, even fireplace in its whole, not to forget insects... some of which yet happen to be forgotten to register, and turns out not at all inadvertently. Like that story of a 17-year-old from Dubai who was wearing her chameleon as a hat in order to carry it to Manchester. “At first I thought it was plastic,” said another passenger, “but then I saw its tongue flick out.”

Or another animal-involved incident with Robert Cusack who was caught in Los Angeles Airport in 2002 with two monkeys in his trousers and their kind friends — four birds of paradise in his suitcase.
However, the UK Border Agency’s recent seizure beat them all: on February 23rd Gatwick Airport’s border officers discovered tens of thousands of dried caterpillars in the luggage of a 22-year-old man who had travelled from Burkina Faso via Istanbul. Four hessian bags contained 94kg of insects shrink-wrapped in cellophane.
The man claimed that the caterpillars were for “personal consumption”. No chance had he though to consume those as the whole consignment was destroyed.
According to the UK Border Force, which said the seizure was the biggest ever of its kind, the insects breach controls on the importation of “products of animal origin”.
Specialists said that they were likely to be mopane worms, the larvae of emperor moths Gonimbrasia belina, which are commonly eaten throughout Africa.
Import restrictions regard products made from meat, dairy, fish, eggs and honey, as well as some fruit, vegetables and plants. The man trying to carry caterpillars has been warned about UK restrictions on importing dried insects.
Stuart Hine, an insect expert at the Natural History Museum, said there was unlikely to be a “tangible threat” to the UK food chain.
“These are likely to be mopane worms, dried caterpillars of the moth, Gonimbrasia belina,” he told The Independent. “These are eaten commonly throughout Africa and are already sold through outlets in the UK, so I can’t see that there is a tangible threat to our food chain.
“That said once this kind of insect foodstuff becomes more common in the UK, either imported or otherwise, it will eventually be subject to UK food standards. At the moment its sale and use is deemed somewhat as a novelty and food standards are not necessarily invoked.”
“This was an unusual seizure but the vigilance of our officers has stopped these dried insects from entering the UK, and possibly posing a risk to our food chain,” proclaimed Ingrid Smith, from the Border Force. “I would warn travellers not to attempt to bring any products of animal origin into the UK without a permit, as they may not have been inspected to appropriate standards and may contain diseases.”
An increasing number of British outlets offer to buy G. belina dried caterpillars for own consumption. The online retailer Firebox sells 40g bags for £16.99, saying that the insects contain three times more protein than beef.
Well, the unlucky insect lover should feel kind of upset as he could've easily had the whole supply of prime dried caterpillars at moderate £40,000, and no biggies with border control.
The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk
Photo: dried caterpillars seized at Gatwick Airport, The Independent, http://www.independent.co.uk
Why Would You Eat That? on mopane worms and Feed The Office experiment by Tasted

07.03.2013 14:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suspecting Melanitis phedima.

07.03.2013 14:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heavy doubt. Digging up this genus at the moment, thankfully I've gathered enough stuff over the past 12 years of expeditions.

07.03.2013 13:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved to N. philyra just as the neighbour photo.

07.03.2013 13:40, Peter Khramov:

To N. philyra "uncertain".

07.03.2013 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

07.03.2013 11:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Dmitry, thanks! Method of exclusion is still a method.

07.03.2013 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Later. Any doubt?

07.03.2013 9:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily! Underside possible please?

07.03.2013 9:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Neptis philyra/philyroides can be surely differentiated by genitalia. Another distinctive feature of philyroides (according to Bozano) is its three small streaks of white on the costal margin, I checked mine specimens collected, so they come up to this feature, can't swear on the Bible though. This very specimen doesn't seem to have such streaks, therefore Neptis philyra might be assumed.

07.03.2013 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Our colleagues from the Far East all seem to have kind of self-defeating mood, like one pouted, another is pleading for the website to be closed. I was confused too by this photo, not with venation though (such quasi-medial stuff can be as well met in other photos of Pieris brassicae on the web). I don't like its broad fore wings, again not looks like Appias. Turns out to be Pieris then. The fore wings look clearly transparent, so Pieris 100% sure. In the Far East there is only Pieris brassicae. Male.

06.03.2013 14:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr, thanks! Looks like not entirely hopeless, there is a beam of light!
Sure, there's a way with a will, and maybe it's the best solution. Anyway, would be great to find a shorter way, to discuss things out and eventually clear them up. Definitely.

06.03.2013 14:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! Don't you please taunt. Or if the very website administrator is talking like that, shalll the whole website be deleted as hopeless, totally of no use?

06.03.2013 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, don't despair. Where there's a will, there's a way. :)

06.03.2013 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Let's remove everything, why only Pieridae...

06.03.2013 8:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Well, looks like we have no experts in Pieridae. Then the whole family should be removed from the website.

05.03.2013 15:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uh-huh..... Got myself confused yesterday. Luckily wasn't late to come round.

05.03.2013 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Right, thanks.

05.03.2013 14:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, check the full name, it has lots of synonyms.

05.03.2013 13:04, Peter Khramov:

Meh.

05.03.2013 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.03.2013 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.03.2013 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.03.2013 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Ok, just will find a place for that...

05.03.2013 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Went to females.

05.03.2013 13:01, Peter Khramov:

So the author was wrong? Moved to "uncertain" so far...

05.03.2013 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.03.2013 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

05.03.2013 0:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Likely to be another species? Reason: Pieris brassicae shouldn't commonly have medial cell. Or?

04.03.2013 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Totally agree with Vasily. If you feel something and doubt, don't say definitely, but use instead "looks like...", "could be..." or question mark at least. This can help others in identifying whilst your right of the first identifier is kept anyway. Otherwise the moderator may inadvertently move such wrong ID. Everyone can be wrong. :)

04.03.2013 20:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could be met in Thailand? Imho, shouldn't confuse the folks with such sayings...

04.03.2013 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UPD: don't move anywhere. Detailed consideration needed. I hurried up, sorry.

04.03.2013 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here is the genus. Species may be moved to Hemistola chrysoprasaria.

04.03.2013 18:21, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

The species seems to be called Hemistola chrysoprasaria.

04.03.2013 18:17, Vasiliy Evdokimov:

This species is called Selenia lunularia.

04.03.2013 13:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.03.2013 12:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea klugii erichsonii.

04.03.2013 12:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea core godartii.

04.03.2013 8:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Elymnias hypermnestra.

04.03.2013 8:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No doubt Euploea phaenareta castelnaui.

03.03.2013 22:42, Igor Sakhno:

Is it either striped from its underside just as all other Catocala?

03.03.2013 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, please fix the thread somewhere to have it before the eyes. Again got lost. Permanently needed.

03.03.2013 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

03.03.2013 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, I myself didn't register there. Ought not depend on that. There was that thread, "Entomological toolkit" that I opened here a couple of years ago, somehow it got lost somewhere. Thank God, I bookmark all the links.

03.03.2013 20:08, Alex Dumchus:

Vasily, thanks for the link, good website for IDing lepidoptera, only some photos of the collection specimens can't be opened, why so? Or registration needed?

03.03.2013 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Protuliocnemis partita.

03.03.2013 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adelpha iphiclus.

03.03.2013 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No other: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id43148/

03.03.2013 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems nothing but that: http://www.biolib.cz/en/taxonimage/id43146/.

03.03.2013 16:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2013 15:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More precisely, Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) harpalyce spatiosa (Mabille, 1877).

03.03.2013 15:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yesterday had no time, just checked it, it's already catalogued as Agriphila aeneociliella.

03.03.2013 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Euphaedra (Euphaedrana) harpalyce (Cramer, [1777]).

03.03.2013 14:37, Yuri Semejkin:

Peter! I am honored here viewpoint. Perhaps the same will express.
1. kolichevstvu ph. It seems inappropriate to limit the number of shots of one species from different places. Let it be with each area at each end for example 2-3 illustrate a particular type of artist. Yes, some butterflies, something perhaps be superfluous, but with others.side and it will be clear (you can see. compare). Those images, which will be the benchmark should demonstrate (when it's real) evidence of the species. ....... Peter. Forum all still like to see, unless of course the people do not mind.
2. The quality of the pictures.The picture is even worse, but definable must be defined and this infa should leave the destination and then the file can be deleted, but not ranee.Komu something seems superfluous as possible, but only through an educational program to facilitate the work of moderators

03.03.2013 13:17, Peter Khramov:

Hint received, won't delete this)

03.03.2013 1:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Surely this one was posted on molbiol as well as some other photos of mine. I'm registered there under my real name and surname (written in Latin letters and with hyphen). Didn't catch the butterfly, let it keep living, so can say nothing of its gender.

03.03.2013 0:19, Irina Nikulina:

If I'm not wrong, this pic was posted on molbiol.ru about 1.5—2 years ago, the discussion included a comment by pro about males happened as well to have such spot.

02.03.2013 23:59, Igor Sakhno:

http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21433.

02.03.2013 23:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Yeah, right. C'est la vie as it's said. What's about the very species? May this suit http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/7679?

02.03.2013 23:50, Igor Sakhno:

Females are said to happen to have that.

02.03.2013 21:28, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea klugii???

02.03.2013 21:24, Alex Dumchus:

Euploea phaenareta maybe?? They say the female wingspan might reach 105mm, this one just fed well being larva.

02.03.2013 20:16, Irina Nikulina:

Always wanted to shoot lathonia so that its nacreousness would be clearly seen))! It is the most nacreous of all of the kind.

02.03.2013 17:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.03.2013 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, that remark was made towards me, wasn't? Oh please, anyone happens to get confused, especially when this someone is sorting out worlds of unidentified stuff. That's life.

02.03.2013 8:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, the answer was the second part of my comment "variability..." and "I have see no any other variants". I'm open to corrections after all.

02.03.2013 7:09, Yuri Semejkin:

"Yury, what would you think identifying species in nature photo?"
Vasily, you didn't answer the question.

02.03.2013 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it's there. Tomorrow (no time now) I'll catalogue it.
http://eol.org/pages/572168/overview.

02.03.2013 5:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yury, what would you think identifying species in nature photo? Species variability matters too, I have see no any other variants though dug through plenty of the Far Eastern Pieris.

02.03.2013 3:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, lesson learned. Henceforth will keep an eye on that. As for photos of mine, I randomly checked several, so no bugs.

02.03.2013 3:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Guys, would you please take more care in the section "Other photos of this specimen"? There is an underside pic, just look on the right and you may see that.

02.03.2013 3:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Vasily! May I ask something please? What did you base upon to ID this as dulcinea (I checked the link given)? What made you think this a sure thing? Taking into account I'm not a pro, just want to clear things up.

02.03.2013 3:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, might it have appeared after the Sinev's book? Anyway, the species is described in the book "Pyralids (Lepidoptera, Pyraloidea: Pyralidae, Crambidae) of the fauna оf Russian Far East", V. A. Kirpichnikova, Dal'nauka, Vladivostok (2009), V. L. Komarov Mountain-Taiga Station, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences. See page 286 or tables 1, 46.

02.03.2013 0:48, Peter Khramov:

Well yeah, even this rather common species could be illustrated with such a poor pic if hasn't been before (don't neglect Ctrl+F5).

02.03.2013 0:46, Peter Khramov:

Was the experiment, when for the sake of more space in the main community does not see the number on truck and species names, and references to them were just a preview image. Result found negative links in the form of numbers and the names of species ph returned.

02.03.2013 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Other pics could have that as well like many recent ones which have been just a bit changed, whilst the browser cache can keep the previous files what may mislead. Posmoderation defect.

01.03.2013 23:45, Peter Khramov:

Some synonym again?.. Can't see the species in the catalogue...

01.03.2013 22:43, Peter Khramov:

Excellent! And foty with determination and without binding. Absolutely not the case.

01.03.2013 22:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved back to "undetermined" and to the "Open case"...

01.03.2013 22:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.03.2013 22:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

01.03.2013 22:32, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

01.03.2013 22:31, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

01.03.2013 22:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.03.2013 21:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Then I give in, this is anything but sappho.

01.03.2013 20:00, Lev Bely:

The underside is there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21257.

01.03.2013 18:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably, Neptis philyroides, Staudinger, 1887, or another? No thoughts without underside........

01.03.2013 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pieris dulcinea indeed: http://www.euroleps.ch/seiten/s_art.php?art=pier_dulcinea.

01.03.2013 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually, it looks like Pieris dulcinea (Butler, 1882).
Range matches too: "NE. China, the Amur and Ussuri regions to Korea and Japan". Anybody please comment?

01.03.2013 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To "uncertain" this one: nothing more similar did I find by now.

28.02.2013 23:05, Irina Nikulina:

Vasily, thank you, I'll keep that in mind) I entered Nymphalis canace when uploading.

28.02.2013 22:37, Lev Bely:

Frankly I've got nothing against David Carter or Vanessa cardui:) Still it's not about being precise in naming the species, but the wordplay. The first and direct meaning of the "painted lady" amusingly also serves as the common name of Vanessa cardui. That's why this time I didn't reference to the Latin names of the species (painted ladies, admirals...) as I usually do, since it's not about putting "repeynitsa" to the comic opera:)

28.02.2013 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I took that from the English book by David Carter "Butterflies and Moths", Dorling Kindersley Limited, London 1992.
The English version of the website also reads "painted lady" as for this species: http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/8620.

28.02.2013 21:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pterothysanus laticilia most probably.

28.02.2013 21:34, Lev Bely:

Vasily, thanks for the remark. In the original article the "painted lady" is mentioned in a rather "theatrical" context, so the translation requires to be literal like "overmakeuped lady (madame, character)" whilst being changed to "repeynitsa" the meaning gets lost.
See: "Painted ladies, yellow admirals and monarchs – the names sound like something from a comic opera..."

28.02.2013 21:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uff .... Understood and # 21115 Macrohastina gemmifera helped it:
http://archive.org/stream/CentreForEntomologicalStudiesAnkaraCesaNewsNr.60/Cesa60_djvu.txt

28.02.2013 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Charaxes zoolina.

28.02.2013 20:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Charaxes numenes.

28.02.2013 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

More one understood: it is one of the synonyms Lophophelma varicoloraria (Moore, 1868), and has helped me in this ........ Do not laugh: aglitski Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lophophelma_varicoloraria

28.02.2013 20:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right....

28.02.2013 20:01, Alex Dumchus:

Agree, don't delete this one, keep as a case study.

28.02.2013 19:59, Alex Dumchus:

Why, should I change the label name Charaxes laodice to Charaxes lycurgus??

28.02.2013 19:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, now it's called Charaxes lycurgus (Fabricius, 1793).

28.02.2013 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UPD: moved.

28.02.2013 18:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Irina, the website search works good. Just you should enter the species name, say, "canace" for this one, and voila, autosuggestion works fine.

28.02.2013 18:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

28.02.2013 18:09, Irina Nikulina:

For some reason the autosuggestion didn't work... The pic is hardly of good quality, yet I decided to upload this since the species was not illustrated with nature pics.

28.02.2013 17:07, Irina Nikulina:

Petr, no biggies, question is still here) As for the background I'd like to say it couldn't look natural as well as in other imago photos of Atrophaneura alcinous. I made an author's comment that those specimens had been raised of pupae in winter (larvae had been picked from birthwort in August) at home. Few specimens emerged in Vladivostok, and the rest did in Moscow, 10 days later, right by the New Year celebration)). Moscow females had such grey submarginal semicircles whilst ones from Vladivostok did pink (as usual), see photo #21312. So there is a question to experts. Whether this difference is an intragenera variation or some outer factors influenced, namely, that pupae had been transported by plane 10000km away in winter not long before the emersion?)

28.02.2013 15:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just for the rec: English Painted Lady is Vanessa cardui, our common "repeynitsa".

28.02.2013 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there is more than one photo wings open, and that one was deleted due to the background looked unnatural. Missed your comment indeed, should have been moved to another pic or not delete the photo at all. Sorry for that.

28.02.2013 12:24, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, thank you. Who will fix them as illustrations. The people who are with the remains in the admin can help - do then ...

28.02.2013 12:11, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I'll add that, thanks.

28.02.2013 11:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From the admin should be # 21077 Plutodes species. move in uncertain now.
By type # 21115 Macrohastina gemmifera and # 21065 Pachyodes varicoloraria "all-knowing Google" anything intelligible can not say.
And like the rest more or less understood.

28.02.2013 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Conclusion?

27.02.2013 22:22, Irina Nikulina:

Petr, photo #21313, Atrophaneura alcinous female, disappeared from the gallery. Since it was good quality, have just one idea, you might have considered that Atrophaneura alcinous already overillustrated? Ok with that. But that photo had my comment/question that I'd like to reask here please. I'd like to hear some pro opinion of the difference between submarginal semicircles of the females http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21314 and http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21312. What's this? Intragenera variation? Saw for the first time grey spots instead of pink. (Those butterflies are from larvae http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21282 picked from the same birthwort, though they emerged from pupa http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21283 under different conditions and in different locations).

27.02.2013 22:19, Alex Dumchus:

Definitely not B. Aslauga, likely to be Imbrasia obscura or I. epimethea, females.

27.02.2013 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The species name is incorrect, this is Cymatophoropsis trimaculata ssp. formosana Matsumura, 1927 (can't add the right name myself).

27.02.2013 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, it is necessary here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/120353 write race with a capital letter. Something I'm tired today: Wait until tomorrow to add ........

27.02.2013 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Species name typo, should be moved to Archaeobalbis cristata.

27.02.2013 17:38, Irina Nikulina:

Thank you, Peter, for the detailed answer. Pros and cons are clear. I agree that a lot of pluses.
Links is not ready to give, I think it is the business of the authors - to walk on for a long time photos have been objectively and decide - is it logical to leave the not too quality in the gallery if there is enough quality for a particular species.Either you do the next time, "weeding" to do so. Number of remote photo almost 6 thousand, of course, impressive. I think that in the absence of pre-moderation in your entry (above) "in this regard, the photographs are now a little more responsibility," it is possible to replace the word "little" to say, "much" or "much more"))

27.02.2013 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is necessary to improve.
It: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/12587 remove tails see any.
And this: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6293 leave.

27.02.2013 15:19, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Check this out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Saturniidae_-_Imbrasia_obscura.JPG.

27.02.2013 5:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male (just as the rest photos): look at its massive antennae :)

27.02.2013 2:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, remove them completely ...... Even I can not do that with my old soap box. Probably here at cheapest phone was filmed.

27.02.2013 1:06, Peter Khramov:

So far moved to "uncertain".

27.02.2013 0:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Can suggest nothing more similar than Bunaea aslauga Kirby, 1877, not completely sure though, the "mirror" spots on its forewings look different...

27.02.2013 0:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, thanks. Did it and worked out. No bugs!

26.02.2013 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as the neighbour photo of this specimen.

26.02.2013 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

26.02.2013 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, people are grumbling already won) remove most, it will be necessary to communicate with the author, explained that as a yes ...

26.02.2013 22:32, Peter Khramov:

Digression: Gentlemen, let's pages ph unsubscribe comments specifically to this particular fotam. If the matter affects the operation of the site in general, I propose to write comments in the relevant subject, or simply create a new one. Yes, forumnye Forums sprogrammil I do not, but the theme is always something new you can open the "community."Now for your question.
I believe that at the moment:
1. Moderation as such need, more can not pour everything.
2. Rights for moderation must be just me, because I can not see even the people who would be adequately combined all the factors in assessing the usefulness foty (see.below), we would have the time / desire to do it and would be responsible for errors and glitches sopustvuyuschie. Now we communicate on this subject with one of the Power juzverej maybe he still join in this activity, but yet. If such people exist - reportedly will be glad to share the load.
3.At screenings photos are taken into account the following factors:
3a. The amount of other kinds of pictures of the same stage of development, subspecies, form etc.
3b. The technical quality of the picture.
3c. The aesthetic quality of the image.
3a. (About) scientific significance: typical / unusual place and other (un) usual.In the future, it will all be synchronized with the interactive map.
3d. Number of other photos and Novichkova author.
3e. Surely there is something that I do not remember right now.
4. were taken from the "garbage" when the site has moderated, ie none Fota did not get into the gallery? It was the following options:
4a.Fota was published as uncertain. Later identified, suffered. Then it was necessary that the author has received the Old photos of the definition, and then I forgot to remove her if she was honest marriage.
4b. When phot was loaded, it was relatively well (bo was little other photons of this type).Then type the number of photons increased, there were more high-quality duplicates, but the old left.
4c. My oversight.
5. How to fix it before? Firstly, when any action with fotoy (e.g., wrapping) in most cases, I looked at the immediately adjacent and, if necessary, something deleted.Second, several times during the existence of the site I was walking across the gallery and weeded all the weeds.
6. What has changed in the transition from pre-moderation to post? What has changed is that the photos are first loaded into the gallery, and then I have them passers-by and weed out superfluous, as well as edit / retouch those that are required.As a result, instead of a couple of days foty hanging and waiting for moderation, they just hang on to the public, including and marriage. But this marriage is removed with equal zeal, just delayed.
Means of this approach:
Marriage for some time is available for viewing at the gallery.Plus, in a situation where the author has uploaded foty, but still affix to them the data in the Personal Area foty without these data can already be seen in the gallery.
Advantages of this approach:
Photographers and other users immediately see the results of your downloads in the gallery.For photographers this is important psychologically for other users - technically (can immediately start to comment, etc.)
Less zavisimot from me or other moderates.
Photographers become more responsible attitude to what to publish and what not.
For beginners it is easier to understand the logic of the site with photos.This global fouls usually does not happen, the photos by removing usually appears not so much (I assure you, much less than was the case pre-moderation), and if there is a new photographer who still do not know all the case, then I am with him always shall communicate and I will explain how to do better in the future, and then daring unwanted pictures.This photographer will be on site and will be able to publish even fewer shots, but better.
Therefore, the global problem of online fotomusora I'm not seeing, and appearing from time to time problems are solved quite easily and should not be callous to you eyes.If you do not agree, and believe that the site is full of examples of frank marriage and unnecessary truck - give links to more examples, not just one load of beginner online.
As usual, it is open to discussion ...
ZYOn the general number of remote photons can be measured by the difference between the number of the last foty (21362) and the number of pictures on the site (15574).

26.02.2013 22:20, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, how could you follow the comments to this pic if I deleted it by your very request? It's moved to the "Open case". Also you'll see the thread amidst your subscriptions as well.

26.02.2013 20:53, Alex Dumchus:

So who will follow that thread??? Say, I'm off for a few days, no web, when will I find the thread when I'm back??? Instead, the last comments to this pic are shown and always on hand. Please then move that thread to the "Open case".

26.02.2013 20:40, Peter Khramov:

To Irina and Alexandr: guys, your comments moved to the thread http://lepidoptera.pro/community/11842 since they're much more about moderating photos in general rather than this very shot. I'll reply your Qs there as well, and other users are welcome to.

26.02.2013 20:38, Peter Khramov:

The previous two comments - Perens from the page pictures # 21325.

26.02.2013 18:32, Irina Nikulina:

Peter, may I join the opinion of Alexander Dumchusa. In fact, he announced that I am going to write, but there were some doubts as I'm new here.Unpleasantly surprised that (along with a good photo!) On the project was a lot of low-quality photos, it is not clear what set at the site and are unable to illustrate the characteristics of a species.Production is not enough high-quality photo makes sense only in one case - when on this type of site is no one picture. And current temporarily until a replacement. When it comes to creating high-quality directory, then I think the selection of photos is a must.I have over the years accumulated a huge amount of macro shots, but as you can see, adding only those species which photos on the site is small, or non-existent, or have a picture better than the ones on the site for the species.Be particularly careful, I think, should be treated to a choice of one or two photos that illustrate the specific form. I think in the section "Technical wishes to snapshots" (in the "terms of use and publication of materials on the site Lepidoptera.ru») in addition to the requirements for size, weight, degree of compression is necessary to make certain demands on the quality of downloadable photos.

26.02.2013 17:11, Alex Dumchus:

Peter.Looking at this picture (they have Deilephila elpenor - 36 pieces) and foty next to him, ask yourself - what we (I mean the authors of the photos) are involved in the project?For me, for example, on the first meste- to participate in creating a good directory-determinant butterfly, the second - to pinpoint their collectible vidy- here need help fellow professionals ..., in the third - to give photos of butterflies, those species which are not in the ph site specific differing subspecies, females, aberrations ...Well, I'll lay out his collection of 500-600 species of butterflies + Te. I've caught, but still double-triple copies ... because the majority are on the site, so what's the point ???
Of course, everyone has their own motivation. Maybe I'm too straight talking, but it's time again to enter schitayu- review ph. IMHO.

26.02.2013 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hello! I'm home, but again without the Internet. Photo Vasily Yevdokimov needed site? For me its the furnace. No species of any kind.

26.02.2013 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Yury, clear the browser cache, that will help.

26.02.2013 14:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, you were right! I've checked the page from different PCs, so it works good there. Appears my browser bug to find it out, why it happens with this very file only.

26.02.2013 9:45, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Nygmia plana sp.?

26.02.2013 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

25.02.2013 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems like Lyssa menoetius (Hopffer, 1856).

25.02.2013 16:52, Lev Bely:


Painted ladies, yellow admirals and monarchs sound kind of comic opera characters, yet the reality is way simpler. These are the common names of some of the butterflies of Ash Island in the abundant in wildlife estuary of the Hunter River, Australia.
Most people know no more than these rather theatrical butterfly names, whilst there is a world of things to discover. What are butterflies' habitats? How do they differ from each other? A new book by Stroud artist Rosie Heritage opens the doors for those who don't know and are not afraid to get more.
Butterflies and Bushland, An Illustrated Guide to the Butterflies of Ash Island contains 40 images of island butterflies by Rosie Heritage. Working on this book, Rosie got as well inspired by amazing Scott sisters' works. Harriet and Helena Scott that lived on Ash Island with their family in the 1800s are known as Australia’s most talented natural history artists.
The book was published by means of a government grant, which is also used for special planting program at the Kooragang wetlands. The program is designed to encourage native butterflies.
Heritage said she had received support from the volunteers and staff at the Kooragang Wetlands Rehabilitation Project, headed by Peggy Svoboda.
A log is kept on the island to record sightings of butterflies.
This record can then be compared with the extensive list of native species kept by Helena Scott, Heritage said.
The Newcastle Herald, http://www.theherald.com.au
Photo: Rosie Heritage artwork, http://churchstreetcommunitygarden.blogspot.ru

25.02.2013 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah..... They all appeared in time or even earlier. Didn't see another.

25.02.2013 15:07, Peter Khramov:

"To be late" meant emersion?

25.02.2013 14:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No skills as for Sphinx ligustri :) Also I never saw hawk moths to be late.

25.02.2013 13:54, Peter Khramov:

Meh, Vasily... Instead you share your skills right here, you just refer people to other websites... Might it be me, I have no such skills, but you should've put it all out here!

25.02.2013 13:45, Boris Lariushin:

Thanks for the good advise, registered, done.

25.02.2013 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Molbiol subj advised to read: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=90944. Asking there might help as well.

24.02.2013 18:03, Alex Dumchus:

Epiphora ploetzi???

24.02.2013 18:01, Alex Dumchus:

Some Bunaea.

24.02.2013 17:59, Alex Dumchus:

Athletes albicans??

24.02.2013 16:45, Peter Khramov:

Still no idea what can it be?

24.02.2013 16:43, Peter Khramov:

Lord, I brake. Not updated dviglo admin under the new system. In general, there is still foty did not appear, at least for the site they were. Now all restored, and there lie the mountains of photographs, for which one must find synonymous views on the site or add to the directory and then bind foty. Who can - request for the case to take.

24.02.2013 16:01, Boris Lariushin:

Hello everybody!

So I am a photographer and post photos on this website. I've got Sphinx ligustri pupa for already second winter. The pupa is alive. I took it with my hand and put it to the light to make a shot and it started budging, made me quite scared. :)

I'd like to ask some expert opinion, are there some raising rules? What should I do to have it finally emerged? Are there some essentials to start the transformation? Is there any chance to see the moth?

It's now placed inside a large glass jar, semi-shadowed, on the wood closet shelf. Should it be set out into the light close to spring?

The pupa photo: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2033.

Regards,
Boris Laryushin
http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery?people=264&perpage=100

24.02.2013 14:11, Boris Lariushin:

Please help, what to do to have this pupa emerged? It's still alive, when I put it to the light, it started budging. Is there any chance to see the moth?

24.02.2013 14:10, Boris Lariushin:

Please help, what to do to have this pupa emerged? It's still alive, when I put it to the light, it started budging. Is there any chance to see the moth?

24.02.2013 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Yury, this file is ok, you've obviously got some browser bug. Try another and you'll see all the copyrights as they're supposed to be. No need to remove, this is a new species besides...

23.02.2013 11:22, Yuri Semejkin:

When comparing, I see the venation is different. Or am I wrong?

22.02.2013 21:11, Irina Nikulina:

I don't object) If the moderators decide this angle would be a better choice for this swallowtail, let's rotate. Once I upload images of the emerged butterflies, I'll rotate, promise) Igor, thanks for the "amazing pic")

22.02.2013 19:52, Igor Sakhno:

Or rather right (it's a swallowtail).

22.02.2013 19:50, Igor Sakhno:

Why not rotate this amazing pic 90 degrees left?

22.02.2013 19:32, Lev Bely:


The Moth's Eye is a new approach by Japanese manufacturer Asahi Glass Co., world's largest flat glass producing company. The strategy is based on the structure of the moth's eye, which is known to have no troubles with sun glares and reflections. The thing is that its eye has a special covering that improves moth vision. The covering of the kind could make it better for smartphone and tablet users, for which reading screen in bright sunlight is always a pain. If the new technology gets successfully implemented, there will be no issues with the bright sun or instead lack of light.
After the moth's eye, the new approach will use a nano coating that is to block out more sunlight than today's display coatings. Asahi Glass Company develops the anti-reflective and anti-glare coating together with Rolling Mask Lithography, a nano coating company founded in 2008 by Dr. Boris Kobrin, Dr. Mark Brongersma, and Julian Zegelman. This is not the first nature-inspired nano coating by Rolith: it has also the Lotus Leaf, Strider on Water, and others.
The Moth’s Eye nano coating was discovered by C. G. Bernhard, when he noticed that the moth cornea emits a smaller amount of light than the human cornea. Back in October 2012 Sharp, Apple’s glass display maker, announced the use of Moth Eye technology as a nano coating for its LCD screens. The Moth Eye technology will be used not only for Sharp smartphones and tablets, but also in its 3D television sets.
Whilst the Moth Eye technology has been initially designed for electronic devices, it's also being considered as a source to improve the formation of current plastics and safer X-rays.
Sony filed a patent (US Patent 7,633,045) to use Moth Eye to produce a unique set of optical devices that will come out under the company name at some indefinite point of time in the future.
Moth Eye technology will be far more advanced than Apple’s Retina display with pixels that are said to be invisible due to that the human eye is unable to notice pixelation at such a high pixel density.
The Droid Guy, http://thedroidguy.com

22.02.2013 12:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr. Nothing happens. It somehow goes wrong only with this very file. Because new species? Suggest to remove, besides it has a wrong name. I'll reupload once it gets surely identified.

22.02.2013 1:05, Peter Khramov:

The URL has .jpg at the end, see?

22.02.2013 0:11, Yuri Semejkin:

http://lepidoptera.pro/images/1024/8103 says "page not found".

21.02.2013 22:36, Irina Nikulina:

No objections) Even more, I totally agree with Alexandr in his wish to see this website good and reliable.

21.02.2013 21:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.02.2013 21:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain". Irina, please comment if have objections.

21.02.2013 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Check it out http://lepidoptera.pro/images/1024/8103.jpg, if nothing changes even there, press Ctrl+F5 on that page.

21.02.2013 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

I suggest moving this to "uncertain". I might be saying an obvious truth, but Amphipoea species can't be identified by photo. I assume it's possible to get a sure ID when having a collected specimen (and moth size appears evident to compare to others) with a detailed and certain biotope, and a deep knowledge of local species. Last winter I was asked by a colleague to recheck already identified species of this kind, so there were just 1 mistake out of 8 specimens of three different genus.
The very name Amphipoea oculea (Linnaeus, 1761) ssp. nictitans Bkh is not quite correct since there is as well synonym nictitans (Linnaeus, 1767). A very good lepidoptera website clearly notes that Amphipoea species can't be surely identified without detailed examination of genitalia: http://www.lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Amphipoea_Oculea. I want this website will be as much good. There are 4 species of this genus in your hood, don't know exactly which are in Kaluga region. Three at least. If this one was identified by professional entomologist that knows local Noctuidae, then there is more certainty, but if it was done by photo solely, then again, better to move it to "uncertain".

21.02.2013 17:10, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, thanks for the remark. I saw this species as Chartographa ludovicaria more than once on Chinese and Korean websites as well as there: http://globalspecies.org/ntaxa/1412906 , http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=297134 и http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php?photo=36142.

21.02.2013 17:00, Irina Nikulina:

Alexandr, this very species was identified long ago (photo dates 2008) by professional entomologist. It read as Amphipoea oculea (LINNAEUS, 1761) ssp. nictitans Bkh. Also I checked this on leps.it and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amphipoea_oculea.

20.02.2013 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Irina, may I ask you how do you identify Amphipoea?

20.02.2013 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Callabraxas ludovicaria is name here. :)

20.02.2013 20:54, Irina Nikulina:

Timandra recompta or Timandra dichela?

20.02.2013 19:45, Lev Bely:


“Demons and Butterflies—Weather predictability and predictions” public lecture by Richard A. Anthes will be held on February 21st at the UNM Conference Center, Albuquerque (US). Dr. Richard A. Anthes is a distinguished atmospheric scientist, author, educator, and administrator, served as fifth president of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) from 1988 to January 2012.
From the science talk's abstract:
“The concept of predictability of complex systems has fascinated scientists for centuries. In the 17th century Gottfried Leibnitz speculated that everything proceeds mathematically, and so someone who had sufficient understanding and could take into account everything, “would be a prophet and see the future in the present as in a mirror.” About a hundred years later the Marquis de Laplace dreamed of an intelligent being (an intellect, later dubbed Laplace’s Demon) who knew the positions and velocities of every single atom and used Newton’s equations of motion to predict the future of the entire universe. In 1972 Edward Lorenz gave a talk on atmospheric predictability with the title “Does the flap of a butterfly’s wing in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?” This rhetorical and provocative question has intrigued scientists and the public ever sense, and “the butterfly effect” has come to mean chaos and lack of predictability of chaotic nonlinear systems. Examples of successful numerical weather forecasts suggest that in some cases there is useful predictability of high-impact weather systems far beyond what classical predictability theory might suggest. In this talk I show examples that provide optimism for continuing to increase the forecast lead time of significant weather and indicate how this progress can continue.”
“Demons and Butterflies—Weather predictability and predictions” public lecture by Richard A. Anthes: February 21st, 5:30 PM at the UNM Conference Center, 1634 University Blvd. NE., Albuquerque (US).
The Albuquerque Journal, http://www.abqjournal.com, UCAR, http://www2.ucar.edu
Photo: Episteme adulatrix

20.02.2013 15:12, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Atrophaneura aristolochiae?

20.02.2013 14:55, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Nyctemera coleta?

20.02.2013 14:31, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Eurema hecabe?

19.02.2013 18:24, Igor Sakhno:

Aporia hippia, probably?

19.02.2013 18:15, Andrey Ponomarev:

This one is Elegia similella indeed.

19.02.2013 18:14, Andrey Ponomarev:

I'm afraid he won't help. Here are some opinions by pros: http://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/1_forum.pl?page=1;md=read;id=25206.

19.02.2013 16:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Pressed Ctrl+F5, the page twitched but no changes.

19.02.2013 16:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Ira, what did you see, is one thing. But zde underside of a particular image, on the other. Place in which no one has proved that it is such a unique look.

19.02.2013 16:37, Irina Nikulina:

On your request to substantiate a link reply http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21263 and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21264. For fidelity definition warrant. Compare underside gives an unequivocal answer. Copper-butterfly Filipeva met three times in large numbers - they plastered all Prinsep in mid-August. (Sorry, do not immediately get a comment)

19.02.2013 16:36, :

On your request to substantiate a link reply http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21263 and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/21264. For fidelity definition warrant. Compare underside gives an unequivocal answer. Copper-butterfly Filipeva met three times in large numbers - they plastered all Prinsep in mid-August.

19.02.2013 16:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Pieris melete?

19.02.2013 15:59, Lev Bely:

Yup, the very cache.

19.02.2013 15:19, Irina Nikulina:

Jura, thanks for the link, the debate is really interesting! What is immediately clear-NOT Celastrina filipjevi, I have seen enough of them you have enough)

19.02.2013 14:46, Peter Khramov:

Vlad needed...

19.02.2013 14:45, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

19.02.2013 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Yury, Lev meant you should reload the page and clear the cache like Ctrl+F5.

19.02.2013 14:23, Yuri Semejkin:

Lev, did that but nothing changed. Curiously this only image's broken.

19.02.2013 13:15, Sergei Kotov:

Ennomos autumnarius.

19.02.2013 12:02, Lev Bely:

Yury, try to refresh the page, I see the full-size pic copyrighted properly.

19.02.2013 0:05, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! Despite the photo fixed, nothing changed. Bug's still there.

18.02.2013 22:01, Andrey Ponomarev:

Alexandr Zhakov and Friedmar Graf identified it as Apomyelois bistriatella on Lepiforum.de.

18.02.2013 16:58, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

18.02.2013 16:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis sappho?

18.02.2013 16:21, Yuri Semejkin:

Neptis sappho?

18.02.2013 16:17, Peter Khramov:

Do not, do not remove the boom!

18.02.2013 16:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Glaucopsyche lycormas.

18.02.2013 14:40, Lev Bely:

Delete no need lost such a wonderful discussion.

18.02.2013 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved to argiades just as another photo of the specimen.

18.02.2013 14:32, Peter Khramov:

Some photos get deleted after upload even a long time later, especially ones of those species which are already overillustrated with alike pics.

18.02.2013 14:29, Peter Khramov:

I managed to download before departure. Please bind the unbound species from the admin (if the site is still there synonyms / generic combinations that I did not find the software), or to make new species, if they and their variants / combinations on the site yet, but then still tie.Most butterflies - from Thailand (from images have appropriate signatures). About some information about the geography there, I guess also from Taya, but have yet to be clarified by the author.

18.02.2013 14:26, Peter Khramov:

Uploading done.

18.02.2013 14:06, Peter Khramov:

The author's ID is Meandrusa lachinus. Isn't this one actually a synonym of http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/15573, huh?

18.02.2013 14:04, Peter Khramov:

The author's ID is Papilio сanopus. Who's allowed to add species, please do so.

18.02.2013 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.02.2013 13:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Thank you all! Perhaps now no one will disagree that to uniquely identify the type of data is not enough. In pritsipe picture can be removed-as useless.

18.02.2013 12:52, Boris Lariushin:

May it be Eurema hecabe? Looks very similar in my non-professional opinion.

18.02.2013 12:47, Boris Lariushin:

Yeah, somehow it got lost. Reuploaded.

18.02.2013 0:26, Yuri Semejkin:

So again I've been collating this shot and one of Lymantria dispar http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21022, can't see the difference. Anybody please explain?

18.02.2013 0:14, Yuri Semejkin:

It reads in full Lymantria fumida_quest. Don't know what "_quest" means.

18.02.2013 0:05, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

18.02.2013 0:04, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2013 21:37, Lev Bely:


Japanese researchers from the University of Tokyo made male silkmoths (Bombyx mori) drive two-wheeled vehicle by distributing synthetic pheromone bombykol in a wind tunnel. Naturally bombykol is released by female silkmoths to attract mates. During the experiment males were fixed, namely glued to a polystyrene ball that functioned like a trackball directing the vehicle. The task was not only to track the pheromone but also to reach the other end of the tunnel within 210 secs, so that neither wall of the chamber would be hit.
B. mori males did great performing as good drivers. Then the researchers made the task more challengeable adding some obstacles like covering the moths’ visual fields (84.2 percent success rate), introducing a turn bias, which increased the forward rotation of the motor on one side, and the backward rotation of the motor on the other side, causing the vehicle to respond unevenly to the moth’s direction (80.8%), and even creating 200—600 ms time delays causing lapse between the moth’s movement and the vehicle’s response. The very time delays didn't confuse the males, though the combination of a time delay and a turn bias appeared quite a challenge.
The end goal of the experiment is a fully-autonomous robot with a “brain” that mimics the silkmoth's sensory perception. The trials showed that B. mori's sensory system is very quick, responsive and adaptive. The test results will be used for creating such a robot, and the information about sensitivity and processing time will be as well useful in deciding the types and numbers of sensors to include.
Someday such “silkmoth” robot may serve as a serious alarm system for chemical spills or device of the kind.
The research published in the March issue of Bioinspiration and Biomimetics, http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-3190.
Ars Technica, http://arstechnica.com
Photo: male silkmoth drives two-wheeled vehicle, Ando, et. al., http://arstechnica.com
B. mori male drives two-wheeled vehicle

17.02.2013 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Soon I'll upload hundred and a half of Thai species, some may be helpful...

17.02.2013 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Right, done.

17.02.2013 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21022.

17.02.2013 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21022.

17.02.2013 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21022.

17.02.2013 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/21022.

17.02.2013 20:25, Peter Khramov:

No, they're just loaded with bugs (many of them have been identified). Accordingly, adjusting and loaded again. Who is going away from the end of the week and will be back loaded.

17.02.2013 20:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.02.2013 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.02.2013 20:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.02.2013 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

17.02.2013 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.02.2013 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.02.2013 19:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cydia pomonella.

17.02.2013 19:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Chrysoteuchia culmella.

17.02.2013 18:59, Andrey Ponomarev:

Batrachedra praeangusta.

17.02.2013 18:54, Lev Bely:

Melitaea dydima? Already identified the same butterfly, it just got lost or something.

17.02.2013 18:47, Andrey Ponomarev:

Isophrictis sp.

17.02.2013 18:46, Andrey Ponomarev:

Pyralis farinalis.

17.02.2013 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Whilst Vladimir Stepanovich is highly competent, the moth condition makes it quite hard to suppose anything. Sinev's Catalogue and Far East identification guides vol. 5, part 4, don't mention this species in Russia, there is grisescens as well.
The larva looks very likely to be Lymantria dispar. Didn't manage to find larvae of the two species mentioned above. Don't insist on anything, just drawing attention. :)

17.02.2013 17:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Identified by V. S. Kononenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Science FEB RAS.

17.02.2013 16:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, yesterday appeared in the gallery more than 100 photos of tropical butterflies without geography, and then disappeared. This is forever?

17.02.2013 16:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr, thanks!

17.02.2013 16:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Macylinea arionides.

17.02.2013 15:48, Eugene Karolinskiy:

> But to quote the determinant LW T5 ch5, I probably is not worth it. And kind Celastrina oreas, is not there.

He is there. But like Maslowskia. :)

Inaccurate ladonides - the most obvious option; but Yuri said that did exactly the picture near ploskosemyannika - food plant oreas (and filipjevi), that would hint. :)

17.02.2013 15:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

The ID is correct. There are three more species of this genus in Primorye, though quite different.

17.02.2013 15:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yuri, see p. 143, it stated that in the Far East this species subspecies levetti, and in Japan it is replaced by a close subspecies ladonides. On the same page, two species of this genus sachalinensis and filipjevi.
The determinants of insect LW T5 ch5 on str.375 i376, we read:
C. ladonides de l'Orza (sachalinensis Esaki)
Hub., Cupid., Prim., Peninsula of Korea, SW China ....... C. l. ladonides
Sah., Yu Cours. ..... C. l. sachalinensis.
Hence, I think it follows that it was about Kurentsova C. ladonides.(synonym levetti, my assumption about synonymization, lit. instructions not found).
For other species of the genus Celastrina, where everything is not easy. But to quote the determinant LW T5 ch5, I probably is not worth it. And kind Celastrina oreas, is not there. Although his offer in the Russian spacecraft.
2. Yuri work Korshunova 1964, during which time many navorochat taxonomy.Celastrina argiolus and Cyaniris argiolus are not synonymous, and a combination of different kinds of species argiolus. This often happens initially Papilio argiolus, then Cyaniris argiolus, today Celastrina argiolus.
The initial view Celastrina argiolus ADVANCED several species and their respective habitats changed. Now examine the genes, and all will become even more difficult.Shown in the photo butterfly, I think you can put into the form ladonides inaccurate definition.

17.02.2013 15:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

May try. :) But afaik knowing external features isn't the sure key in this case.

17.02.2013 15:24, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2013 15:24, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2013 15:21, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yuri! Here the key point - the year of publication in 1964, and (I think) 1970. lepidopterist does not stand still. As I understand it, somewhere to 70 it was considered that the type of C. argiolus - it Holarctic species inhabiting entirely Eurasia and North America. Polee modern isledovanija shown that it is not. All in.American researchers have gradually "destroyed" this complex 5 or 6 different species, and argiolus among them anymore. A similar story - in the Amur region and Primorye. Ie if satisfied state of science 40 years ago, we can assume that this argiolus. ;)

As for the generic names: simplistic - yes, it is synonymous.In fact, around the same time in the Soviet Union completely replaced the conventional classification of childbirth. Some names have fallen asleep in the Lord, some actually "moved" to another family (as happened to Cyaniris). (In fact, each of the generic name has the type species, that is just before us is the name used is incorrect.) Just look at the names of genera and Kurentsova at least compared to those on this website. In general, Linnaeus was one genus - Papilio. So if satisfied state of science 250 years ago - the butterfly on a picture called Papilio argiolus L.;)))

17.02.2013 15:19, Yuri Semejkin:

Everes argiades.

17.02.2013 14:46, Yuri Semejkin:

There is a link to Oleg Berlov's pics http://babochki.narod.ru/ly18pr.html.

17.02.2013 13:16, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Evgeny, what if I call for pages copied from the identification guide to Thai butterflies with Mycalesis sp. close-ups, might it help?

17.02.2013 11:18, Yuri Semejkin:

I might be wrong but isn't Everes argiades=Cupido argiades ?

17.02.2013 10:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Lymantria dispar?

17.02.2013 4:44, Yuri Semejkin:

There was a question about Celastrina argiolus.Ya seen in an Internet link that this butterfly in the Far East is not. It seems convincing? But:
1. The determinant Kurentsova, page 143 there is a description butterflies Cyaniris argiolus L (copper-butterfly spring). In an Internet it says that it is an invalid name. What kind of butterfly in question and how it is now called?
2. There are others. This article link http://babochki-kryma.narod.ru/files/lib/Korshunov_1964.htm YPKorshunova Butterflies of Lepidoptera -yuzhny coast of Crimea. Where he writes: This article is supplemented appropriate (modern name) described in her Crimean species.
Then bring in the order [Celastrina argiolus] Cyaniris argiolus L. Is that synonymous? Ie Celastrina, -Modern name Cyaniris argiolus? ...... About the raprostraneniya: All of Europe, North Africa, small and Wed. Asia and Siberia to Japan.Therefore it is in the Far East is. For more information on the link, para 89

17.02.2013 4:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

No doubt Mycalesis sp., but can't be surely said mineus. Too many similar species...

16.02.2013 20:00, Lev Bely:

Jamides sp.

16.02.2013 19:44, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Oops, spotted that... Down the page...

16.02.2013 19:43, Svetlana Shchavelina:

No "Refresh" button...

16.02.2013 19:26, Peter Khramov:

Svetlana, you now may do it yourself in the "Uploaded images" section. Try please? Everything works good?

16.02.2013 18:35, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Forgot to add the shot location: Thailand, Ratchaburi province.

16.02.2013 18:09, Mdsaiful Sakim: This species is identified correctly.

16.02.2013 15:10, Roland Kratzer:

Acraga sp.

15.02.2013 21:31, Lev Bely:

Mycalesis mineus?

15.02.2013 20:32, Lev Bely:


Climber Araujia sericifera belonging to the Apocynaceae family has different common names including “moth plant” and “cruel vine”. Its beautiful white flowers have plenty of sweet, sticky nectar, which attracts monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). The latter get deadly stuck to flowers trying to feed on and eventually die right on-site.
New Zealand's leading the serious campaign against the moth plant, which moreover has a bad reputation of an invasive toxic plant. The climber has been added to the National Pest Plant Accord and to the Ministry for Primary Industry list of unwanted plants that cannot be sold, propagated or distributed.
The Auckland Council recommends people pull out all the moth plant seedlings and bury them deeply, as well as using stump paint and herbicides.
The Northland Regional Council biosecurity officer Sara Brill said the plant was ranked among the top non-pastoral climbing pest plants.
“It invades and smothers native forest areas, garden shrubs, shelterbelt trees and roadside plants, and its milky, sticky sap can also cause skin irritation and ill health.”
It was also a killer of monarch butterflies, she said.
“The moth plant, or perhaps more aptly named “cruel plant” as it is sometimes known, has masses of lovely flowers full of nectar at the moment. Unfortunately, what the unsuspecting butterfly doesn't know is that this nectar is so sticky it will trap the butterfly's tongue and it can't get away.”
Ironically, monarch larvae known to develop solely on milkweed can be alternatively fed on this very Araujia sericifera plant if offered instead of milkweed.
As it happens, such “flower detainee” eventually dies not being able to unstick itself. Recently in Whangarei Brill and a colleague spotted a rather small Araujia with a bunch of dead monarchs stuck to its flowers.
The plant can be easily recognised by its climbing vine, elongated paired leaves and particularly small, clustered white flowers, which develop into oblong seed pods.
People keen to get rid of moth plants could remove small infestations by hand, Ms Brill said.
“Seedlings are easy to pull but even large plants can be easily killed by finding the main root and pulling out about 5cm of the root. The plant will wilt within 24 hours and you can see if you have missed any smaller ones.”
Large infestations might need to be over-sprayed using specialised herbicide, Ms Brill said.
The New Zealand Herald, http://www.nzherald.co.nz
Photo: dead monarch butterfly in the Araujia sericifera flower, http://www.nzherald.co.nz

15.02.2013 10:38, Peter Khramov:

Appears to be bug, the soft likely laid one more copyright upon the actual one. Thanks for the hint, I'll fix that!

15.02.2013 7:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! What's wrong?
Looking at the photo that reads "Yuri Semejkin, Lepidoptera.ru" as usual. Click on it, then see... Yury, then something illegible like Sokolkov, Lepidoptera.pro. I've checked the neighbour photos, no such things on there!

15.02.2013 5:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Evgeny, sorry for any confusion. Comprehension repaired!

15.02.2013 2:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yury misunderstood my comment, no biggie. We seem to have repaired comprehension. :)

14.02.2013 21:16, Alex Dumchus:

Also Nox is red only in thorax whilst these have whole red body.

14.02.2013 21:05, Alex Dumchus:

One has wingspan 58mm, another 62, mine Nox male 75, female about 90mm. Maybe, Nox nix? Or Nox something else? Tomorrow or the day after I'll upload photos of them both. Petr, that will be several butterflies in one photo, what's bad but... the truth is a better friend.

14.02.2013 15:58, Peter Khramov:

Yury, Evgeny meant that he e-mailed you not to write it here, only that. There is nothing in his words about you e-mailing anyone.
Guys, lest we forget that the web communication often lacks mutual understanding. So take this into account and don't judge each other too fast...

14.02.2013 13:07, Yuri Semejkin:

14.02.2013, Evgeny Karolinsky
"Yury, I e-mailed you not to flood the website. :)"

I didn't e-mail anyone about this discussion. All messages from me are here. What's going on? Petr! I've got an e-mail from Evgeny on skippers. Evgeny, is it yours? Or spam?

14.02.2013 11:56, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, if your e-mail had nothing personal, next time feel free to "flood" the website. I meant reaching record is good not bad.

14.02.2013 4:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yury, I e-mailed you not to flood the website. :)

14.02.2013 2:03, Peter Khramov:

Yury, why "out of the question"? Not in the least. I said that the Community would be changed (though not many people commented that subj, folks are indifferent as always). Just it takes some time and I'm still finishing the collection soft. So something of a message board is sure to be, not tomorrow though, but in a fortnight or so.

14.02.2013 0:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! As I see, message board is already out of the question? Pity then. Still it would be a great thing to discuss doubtful cases, check different literature, clear out such things for everyone here. Don't be afraid that folks won't handle with engine like it was with Comstock's system, or IDs based on a certain spot or band. Eventually something new will appear on the website. Japanese, for one, sorted out everything in a perfect way, butterflies and moths. And what we've got?

14.02.2013 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Right, updated.

13.02.2013 21:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wasn't moved to "identified successfully".

13.02.2013 21:13, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, what's with wingspan?

13.02.2013 20:53, Juriy Rogozin:

Definitely not A. varuna, both female and male have forewing veins marked with white whilst hind wings aren't glaucous. Instead similar to A. nox male, forewings are a bit darker and glaucous (wingspan is about 7—8 cm).

13.02.2013 18:03, Peter Khramov:

Whoah.

13.02.2013 17:22, Peter Khramov:

We seem to be reaching record number of comments to a photo...

13.02.2013 13:52, Yuri Semejkin:

"13.02.2013 3:29, Evgeny Karolinsky
I'm familiar with Y. A. Chistyakov's publication, holding it in my hands now. Sadly there are several serious mistakes made on the identification by photo (blues and skippers)."

Won't comment the mistakes. As for skippers, everything seems right instead. So again words without proofs. Please give me the species and page, I'll see what you're talking about? And argue these "serious mistakes" you found out. You seem to see this clear, no doubt, no difficulties with skippers. Then explain it to folks, "knowledge to people", as Petr said before. Elucidate why you don't agree with some of the books IDs, which you deem as species wrongly identified.
As for the books, I scanned Kurentsov's book and part of the "Identification guide to insects of Russian Far East", though these appear kinda tough for an amateur. I'd like someone to help.
Also this. The moving of species seems kinda weird. Like some old and reliable user says something like "Can't name the species, but I know it's identified wrongly". Amusing though meaningless word play. Ok, there are some species that require detailed genitalia examination to be identified. But when it's not the thing, you get a similar reply like "There are no such species in your hood". That's all "knowledge to people" so far.
Sometimes it really feels like certain commentators are naturally out of subject. Hence I'd like to get some detailed resume in comments or discussion board or wherever else with analysis of the ID and reasoned conclusions. Let's sort out all issues. Sure, each case can't be treated as ideal, no time for that, but some at least.

13.02.2013 11:40, Peter Khramov:

Alert comrades signaled that, well, the website Entomological online store Lepstore hangs a message that you can go to the login and password Lepidoptera.ru, but no confirmation on Lepidoptera not, you can become a have-to go or that some enemies decided potyrili password? The signal is correct, the better once again to test. So. Yes, the user base is synchronized with the base Lepstore.ru Lepidoptera.ru, you can safely go to the store's website by pointing mail and password for modeling, with your data anywhere "left" will not go away . Made it A) to heighten the convenience B) for special promotions (discounts / bonuses / gifts) among users of modeling, Lepstore become customers in the future.
ZYThese things acknowledgment relates only to the site http://lepstore.ru. On other sites passwords from modeling should not be asking.

13.02.2013 3:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I'm familiar with Y. A. Chistyakov's publication, holding it in my hands now. Sadly there are several serious mistakes made on the identification by photo (blues and skippers), and these cases are way clearer than identification of Celastrina. The thing is that, as I see, the author isn't pro in butterflies but in some moth groups. Yury, so you decide for yourself whom you believe. :) Imho, one shouldn't believe blindly anyone; instead check different books, compare the info and make own conclusion.

13.02.2013 3:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Thanks. Forgot/fouled, I used it already. :)

12.02.2013 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

12.02.2013 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.02.2013 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.02.2013 19:16, Peter Khramov:

Yury, I corrected your comment, it didn't actually look like one of another author, just your name wasn't added to the comment...

12.02.2013 18:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, there is no need to believe me, I actually have a very poor knowledge of lepidoptera of Russian Far East and Primorye particularly, this region is out of my interest. Also I'm not familiar with Y. A. Chistyakov's publication, which issue year you never mentioned. I just wanted to lay out the situation. I referred to the publication that summarized the research of all Russian lepidopterists, Sinev's Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia. If this publication doesn't seem competent, let's refer to the corypheus of the Russian Far East butterflies, A. I. Kurentsov and his work "The Butterflies of the Far-East USSR" that mentions Celastrina argiolus yet subspecies levetti. There are only two species of this genus in Primorye.
Open the next book "Identification guide to insects of Russian Far East", vol. 5, pt. 5, 2005, where Celastrina argiolus is mentioned in the north of the Amur region, Yakutia, Chita, Buryatia, Siberia (except north), Caucasus, European Russia northwest, China, Mongolia, the Himalayas, Iran (mountains), Afganistan, Central Asia, Western Asia, Europe (west and east), and also three species in Primorye. Check this book, should be in the library of the Botanical Garden, the systematics couldn't quite change over the past 8 years.

12.02.2013 17:08, Yuri Semejkin:

My part begins with "As for the statement "There is no Celastrina argiolus in Primorye", please elaborate where it actually is? Lazy to check the web now. So I ask you to refer to Y. A. Chistyakov...".

12.02.2013 17:06, Yuri Semejkin:

"1. There is no Celastrina argiolus in Primorye, even somewhere nearby. See Sinev's Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, already discussed here."
Petr, can't get why my comment reads as its of A. Zhakov?

12.02.2013 17:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! I've tried to question here the very identification process. Now look at this 11.02.2013 20:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

"Both Evgeny already said it right, now I'll try to explain it more thoroughly.
Also this is a clear example of two burning questions about common names and locations.
So the answer to Yury.
1. There is no Celastrina argiolus in Primorye, even somewhere nearby. See Sinev's Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, already discussed here."

As for the statement "There is no Celastrina argiolus in Primorye", please elaborate where it actually is? Lazy to check the web now. So I ask you to refer to Y. A. Chistyakov, Ph.D. in Biological Science, and his book "Live Mosaic. Butterflies of the Primorye region, Vladivostok city", page 89. Let Alexandr Zhakov check it, this book should be available on the web (didn't check myself since I've got a print edition).
So the author says this very butterfly Celastrina argi0lus L. is expanded all around here. Larvae feed on beans.
Petr! Tell me then to whom should I listen to, to A. Zhakov who's not local and says that there is no Celastrina argiolus in Primorye, or to the local expert who got a book published?
Maybe we still need message board? This can be always deleted if doesn't work out.

12.02.2013 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved this one and the neighbour photo.

12.02.2013 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, this feature has been available since long ago. And yes, Svetlana is right, these two are already grouped (see the right column "Other photos of the species").

12.02.2013 16:13, Yuri Semejkin:

According to the Institute of Biology and Soil Science FEB RAS, this is a new, undescribed species. It actually can be moved to I. punctigera since no other variants published yet.

12.02.2013 15:31, Yuri Semejkin:

"Seems that the Community's about to transform into something of a message board..."
It's time, maybe? Looking back at many years of eliminating science (no one to forget protest meetings, blocked roads and so on), different cuts including taxonomists. Hopefully, some things in this country have been changed for the better.

12.02.2013 12:14, Alex Dumchus:

Deal. Just this Euploea is so large. The wing span is 12cm.

12.02.2013 10:40, Svetlana Shchavelina:

These pics are already grouped...

12.02.2013 2:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Could be varuna. I'm not a pro in this group. :)

12.02.2013 2:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Zemeros flegyas.

12.02.2013 2:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I. ?similis. Isn't this perchance the same butterfly that's #20794 photo :)

Btw, is it possible to group several photos of the same specimen?

12.02.2013 2:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ideopsis similis.

12.02.2013 2:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Megisba malaya.

12.02.2013 2:35, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

12.02.2013 0:39, Peter Khramov:

I received a signal that, they say, after some moderation ph appeared mark "editing site", and the changes are not seen. This can occur when the cache of your browser were old pictures, and he is too lazy to update them. To check - press Ctrl + F5 on the photo page.In this case, refresh the page in full, including a new version of the image.

11.02.2013 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Guys, please note the size as a comment to photo than use squared paper, rules and all such measuring tapes, ok?..

11.02.2013 20:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Both Evgeny already said it right, now I'll try to explain it more thoroughly.
Also this is a clear example of two burning questions about common names and locations.
So the answer to Yury.
1. There is no Celastrina argiolus in Primorye, even somewhere nearby. See Sinev's Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, already discussed here.
2. There are 4 Celastrina species in Primorye, Celastrina ladonides, Celastrina filipjevi, Celastrina oreas and Celastrina phellodendroni. They are all rather similar, and the last three are endemic in this region of Russia. Again, please refer to Sinev's Catalogue, already discussed here.
3. In case one or several of these species appear early in the spring, they all naturally share this general common name "spring blue". Distinctions might be hard to see to non-pros whilst the phenology is similar. If we assume that the Russian common name has something to do with the genus, then you must add which one is "spring". :)
Evgeny and another Evgeny both argue correctly noting the absence of this species in where the shot was taken and saying there is a bunch of species hard to identify by photo. Furthermore, if Yury didn't note the location, the species would stay wrongly identified on the website.
Only real expert who has deep knowledge of the blues in Primorye and especially of this very genus is able to make a relatively reliable conclusion using exclusion methods to come to the most possible variant.

11.02.2013 17:10, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny and another Evgeny:--) Please elaborate why it's not an argiolus. Knowledge to people.

11.02.2013 17:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2013 17:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2013 17:07, Peter Khramov:

Other opinions?

11.02.2013 17:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2013 17:07, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

11.02.2013 17:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2013 17:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

11.02.2013 17:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2013 17:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2013 17:05, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

11.02.2013 17:04, Peter Khramov:

Seems that the Community's about to transform into something of a message board...

10.02.2013 12:16, Lev Bely:

Delias hyparete?

10.02.2013 8:49, Yuri Semejkin:

This one is one of the "earliest bird" amidst the blues, and that's the origin of its Russian common name "spring blue". What do you have against argiolus? Let's not just say "neither this, nor that". Anybody willing to clear this out? Otherwise all foresaid is proofless.

09.02.2013 22:41, Lev Bely:


The "Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths" series in ZooKeys, a peer-reviewed open access academic journal for the field of zoology by Pensoft Publishers, since its very first 2009 edition has been known as a major bulletin in the world of taxonomy news and new discoveries of moths in North America. 49 publications by 38 authors have been issued over the last few years, and the series became highly popular just as another ZooKeys edition Canadian Staphylinidae.
The back issues covered mostly the North American fauna — Canada, United States and Mexico. The latest broadened to tropical areas and included regions from all over North and South America, the contiguous islands and territories.
The issue also describes 27 new species including moths from North America, Venezuela, Brazil, Argentina and the Dominican Republic. 5 newly described species enlarged the big family of the neotropical Arctiidae that are called “tigermoths” due to their specific tiger stripe pattern.
Another curious and either newly described species Paectes longiformis was discovered near the Brazilian Salvador-Deputado Luís Eduardo Magalhães International Airport. Despite its modest appearance, the moth has the potential to make up a particular weapon for biological control of invasive and troublesome Schinus terebinthifolius spreading in Florida, since this plant serves as the moth's habitat and food source.
The latest issue of the Contributions to the systematics of New World macro-moths IV ZooKeys 264 (2013): Special issue: 1-2 is available on the publisher website http://www.pensoft.net/journals/zookeys/issue/264/.
EurekAlert!, http://www.eurekalert.org
Photo: the new species Paectes longiformis, Dr. Michael Pougue, http://www.eurekalert.org

09.02.2013 11:03, Yuri Semejkin:

E. A. Belyaev from the Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS reckons this is some Yponomeuta moth, the family Yponomeutidae.

09.02.2013 10:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Glaucorhoe unduliferaria (Motschulsky, 1861). Identified by E. A. Belyaev, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

09.02.2013 10:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Glaucorhoe unduliferaria (Motschulsky, 1861). Identified by E. A. Belyaev, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

09.02.2013 9:03, Alex Dumchus:

Doesn't look like Nox, its hind wings are instead slightly serrated, the very butterfly is smaller and bright glaucous. Besides, Nox is of lighter colour at the wing edges. A. varuna, maybe?

09.02.2013 4:56, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2013 4:56, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2013 4:56, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2013 4:54, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Atrophaneura ?nox.

09.02.2013 4:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. aristolochiae.

09.02.2013 4:51, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2013 4:51, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2013 4:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Junonia lemonias.

09.02.2013 2:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Identification questions. Here's a picture http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/20771, not sure even what's its family? Maybe, there should be opened some thread where those interested could ask why an imago goes to this or that family or species. I'd like to practice in identifying and to get corrected by professional entomologists using their slang. All unknown definitions can be found on the web, or in tough cases they may be asked right here.
It's already told here that questions of the kind are already being discussed on other websites. Can't say about others, but for me personally it would be much easier to do it here and get info on this website. I've checked another site, couldn't upload anything there and so I got lost.

09.02.2013 2:17, Yuri Semejkin:

"like leaf-miners tracks in leaves or some nest of whatsoever else. So what's your thoughts, do we need to put in such special mark in "Stage/gender"?"
That's the question. Does the website need such mark? If yes, then the whole chain should be arranged as "imago-larva-pupa-egg". And the "larva" stage should include "larva" (instar if possible), "larva leaf house" (and its shape), "leaves used for larva house", "damages (in order) made by larvae of different instars". If possible, note the plant it was picked from (or better raised on). This will allow to expand knowledge of host plants. Example: two years ago I picked a larva to raise from Asarum sieboldii, so I raised that and eventually it emerged into a moth that was later successfully identified, but when I noted the plant it had been picked from and fed on, they told me that no moths of the species were seen on that plant. Naturally, I was requested to reprocess the whole thing, but in the past year I couldn't find any larva in Asarum sieboldii, maybe this year will be better. So please note the plant species too. Only there we have another question like how to make sure if the information of the plant provided by user is authentic?

08.02.2013 14:09, Alex Dumchus:

Evgeny, what's this critter? Caught in the same place.

07.02.2013 22:47, Lev Bely:

Acraea violae?

07.02.2013 22:44, Lev Bely:

Delias hyparete?

07.02.2013 22:21, Vladimir Savchuk: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2013 21:49, Lev Bely:

Should be the same Lamproptera curius just as there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/20688.

07.02.2013 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.02.2013 20:00, Lev Bely:

Cigaritis syama?

07.02.2013 20:00, Lev Bely:

Cigaritis syama?

07.02.2013 19:24, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.02.2013 15:54, Lev Bely:


Genetic research of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella has revealed the secret of the world's worst agricultural pest that costs about $5 billion damage every year in crop losses and insecticides.
An international consortium also involving two Australian scientists has decoded the genetic blueprint, depicting how rapidly P. xylostella larvae evolve resistance to insecticides.
Professor Geoff Gurr of the Australian Charles Sturt University said the moth's evolutionary trick lays in its ability to detoxify the defence compounds produced by plants in the cabbage family, the same compounds that make mustard pungent and cabbage smelly.
“Remarkably, it appears that the very genetic adaptations that allow the diamondback moth to cope with these natural compounds also allow it to detoxify the insecticides used against it,” Gurr said.
Scientists suppose the decoding of the P. xylostella genetic code will make it possible to implement new insecticide resistance-monitoring techniques as well as develop pest-management strategies.
18,000 separate genes were identified in the course of the genetic research that lasted several years and cooperated 40 scientists.
The Age, http://www.theage.com.au
Photo: P. xylostella
The decoding of the diamondback moth genome

07.02.2013 13:42, Max Tairov:

I'm here not long and wonder too how people communicate without message board )

06.02.2013 16:06, Peter Khramov:

So the spam finally freaked me out. Since now we use CAPTCHA at new user registration. If something goes wrong, please don't hesitate to e-mail me directly, and we'll sort that out.

06.02.2013 0:25, Valeria Tichenko:

Oops, they're synonyms!))))))

06.02.2013 0:24, Valeria Tichenko:

Please explain to a dummy, is Teia wrong?

06.02.2013 0:21, Valeria Tichenko:

No any, only I didn't put the family, so the system might haven't caught that.

05.02.2013 23:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

05.02.2013 21:30, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2013 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, they're already identified on the Valeria's website, no objections :).

05.02.2013 21:00, Peter Khramov:

To Alexandr: the author had the right ID (can see the original filename), just wasn't put properly, so I put Valeria as the ID-er.
To Valeria: any trouble with adding the name of the species upon upload?

05.02.2013 21:00, Peter Khramov:

To Alexandr: the author had the right ID (can see the original filename), just wasn't put properly, so I put Valeria as the ID-er.
To Valeria: any trouble with adding the name of the species upon upload?

05.02.2013 18:37, Peter Khramov:

Still not coania? Moved.

05.02.2013 18:37, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.02.2013 18:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.02.2013 18:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.02.2013 16:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Junonia almana.

05.02.2013 16:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Junonia orithya female.

05.02.2013 16:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Junonia orithya male.

05.02.2013 16:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Cupha erymanthis.

05.02.2013 15:58, Alex Dumchus:

Evgeny, I put photos of all Junonia caught on there. I feel one of them is Coenia.

05.02.2013 14:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. agleoides "uncertain".

05.02.2013 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to vulgaris.

05.02.2013 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Aha. Updated.

05.02.2013 4:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orgyia dubia.

05.02.2013 4:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orgyia dubia.

05.02.2013 3:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Why so? See
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30160010.html
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30150010.html
Look at the discal spot, which is a diagnostic feature. The rest features suit as well.

05.02.2013 3:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This is Parantica instead. :) agleoides, probably.

05.02.2013 3:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Coenia is from that very hood, but there are plenty of local Junonia in Southeast Asia. Are you sure that was coenia? Never heard of coenia's acclimatization.

05.02.2013 3:02, Eugene Karolinskiy:

To "uncertain" athalia. :)

05.02.2013 2:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, yet you're right about some things, when the species is to be identified, there are two scenarios: 1. "Ok, this one looks similar to that species, I'll put a question then" (those who know species poorly). 2. "No location? Hell with that, or this will finally turn out to be some Asian twin" (those who know species good). Also if some species without location data don't have the "undetermined" status, this doesn't mean they're identified correctly. Neither do I try to ID such, nor Evgeny, Dmitry or Vasily feel great about those. The new upload page should have a big red text saying "Please provide the photo/s with precise caught/shot location since this increases the scientific value of your picture", or sort of. :)

04.02.2013 20:00, Alex Dumchus:

Did it settle. Flies in masses in the jungles, though look paler than its South American brother. Apropos, don't Junonia coenia and other Junonia from that hood (America) as well? They're very common butterflies on Samui.

04.02.2013 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems this one should be kept as it is.

04.02.2013 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let it be vulgaris :) Absolutely rely on Evgeny's identification.
The species are very similar, I may have slipped up.

04.02.2013 14:41, Peter Khramov:

While there is no better solution, move it to Leptidea sinapis "uncertain" with a subtitle note Leptidea sinapis complex.

04.02.2013 14:39, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, agree?

04.02.2013 14:39, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, Vasily please comment.

04.02.2013 14:39, Peter Khramov:

Well, why "why"? ;--)

04.02.2013 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Pieris canidia to "undetermined" just as another photo of the specimen.

04.02.2013 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Pieris canidia to "undetermined" just as another photo of the specimen.

04.02.2013 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Pieris canidia to "undetermined".

04.02.2013 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 14:34, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 14:34, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

04.02.2013 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 14:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 14:32, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 14:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved to athalia.

04.02.2013 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved to athalia "uncertain".

04.02.2013 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 4:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, that depends upon goals. Me personally, I'm not interested in identifying whatever without location data. :) And that location should be as much precise. Just "Moscow region" is not enough! ;) Matter of taste, though.

04.02.2013 4:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Melitaea sp. Most probably M. athalia.

04.02.2013 4:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Rather athalia.

04.02.2013 4:34, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2013 4:33, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2013 4:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2013 4:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Pseudopanthera macularia.

04.02.2013 4:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Z. flegyas.

04.02.2013 4:30, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Without question mark, I think. :)

04.02.2013 4:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. meges.

04.02.2013 4:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. meges.

04.02.2013 4:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. meges.

04.02.2013 4:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. ?curius

04.02.2013 4:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

curius.

04.02.2013 4:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

curius.

04.02.2013 4:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

curius.

04.02.2013 4:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

curius.

04.02.2013 4:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Definitely not canidia. Imho, Appias sp., can't name the species. Two neighbour photos are the same case.

04.02.2013 4:17, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Dryas iulia, neotropical species. By the way, this one has already settled in Thailand, supposedly after fled from one of such butterfly gardens (why do they even exist???:))

04.02.2013 4:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Doleschallia bisaltide.

04.02.2013 4:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Euthalia sp., the species will be a next go. :)

04.02.2013 4:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Elymnias hypermnestra.

04.02.2013 4:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, in such case we'd better say Leptidea sp. Or combine two species in one page. Or have it as L. sinapis complex, they use this at times. What to do when these species can't be identified by appearance only.

04.02.2013 4:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho vulgaris.

04.02.2013 4:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I. vulgaris.

04.02.2013 2:02, Peter Khramov:

As for the lists and choosing location, I sadly still haven't integrated Google Maps to make it possible. As it's done, the location feature will take off.
As for the main question, let's see the numbers. Now there are 737 photos of undetermined species on the website (see the Gallery), out of which 49 have no location noted http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery?prec=8&nogeo=1, and 34 out of 49 are ones of Aleksey Gnilenkov that were uploaded, I repeat, by me, not him. As I said above, those pics were taken in Laos and Moscow region. If you need some details more, I'll ask the author to add those, not a big deal. Ergo, 15 shots left, the authors of which are Viktor Kolesnikov (Kazakhstan), Dina Rogatnykh (Amur region), Alex Dumchus, Alexandr Yurochkin (Ukraine). The first three usually note location, and these lacking photos seem to have been added much earlier when it maybe was not so clear how to make it properly. So if the identification of these very species depends vitally on the location, just comment a photo. Now authors are free to add the location any time, no matter how long ago they uploaded their photos. If however they won't notice your call, I'll email them what as well any of you may do, their emails are open to everyone.
Guys, according to the foresaid, I'd' like to ask, where is there a trouble with location of the undetermined photos on the website?
While I'm waiting for your replies, want to mention some issues that we will have if the location note becomes mandatory:
1. New users happen to experience some difficulties in the upload process. Not everyone can comprehend what she/he has to do. This might seem banal to veteran users, yet I assure you, the thing is real.
2. Some users who are not familiar much with zoology may be disconcerted with not interface but the very location field. That happens too.
3. Now we've got no moderation. So users may upload photos first and then gradually change/add info in their personal accounts. When they upload whole archives, it's the one possible way to process data. What to do in such case if not only put some special button in the personal account? Which (button) appears to be not handy.
At the same time, when a new user is uploading photos without location and we ask him/her to do and explain how to do that, he/she usually adds all the necessary info and keeps that in mind for future pics. So why scapegoat and drive away people than instead elucidate and teach little by little how to handle properly with uploads?

04.02.2013 1:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:41, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:35, Peter Khramov:

:--) Fixed that.

04.02.2013 1:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

04.02.2013 1:32, Peter Khramov:

I'm sorry, I mislabelled this inadvertently.

04.02.2013 1:32, Peter Khramov:

50/50 or still it's possible to move this to the species?

04.02.2013 1:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:30, Peter Khramov:

So far moved to icarus. Alexandr, please comment if you agree with Evgeny.

04.02.2013 1:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Athyma perius.

04.02.2013 1:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Athyma perius.

04.02.2013 1:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:27, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:25, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:25, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

04.02.2013 1:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:24, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:19, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 1:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2013 1:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.02.2013 0:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wasn't moved.

03.02.2013 21:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Parthenos sylvia.

03.02.2013 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ideopsis similis.

03.02.2013 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ideopsis similis.

03.02.2013 19:49, Elvir Izmailov:

I think yes. Even I am myself not a frequent visitor, imho, message board is of need. Without one it's hard to make a good home community on the website. Threads may vary like advises on butterfly photography, discussions on the website development, identification with photos of poor quality and many more, maybe even some off top threads )).

03.02.2013 17:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ideopsis similis.

03.02.2013 16:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, I've got no any other nicknames or pseudonyms here. I am who I am :) Some bug, perhaps?

03.02.2013 16:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I think, it's useless to identify them by photo made in nature so I wrote sinapis.

03.02.2013 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

All downloaded, probably was a glitch my computer. :)

03.02.2013 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Me too, I'm for the proper filling of the "Caught/shot location" field. If it's technically possible, this could be expanded with subfields "Country", "Region", "Nearest inhabited locality", and at least the two first must be mandatory.

03.02.2013 13:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

How come this was identified by Alexander Shpanev? Or it's Vasily's pseudonym :)

03.02.2013 13:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Press the "Upload Comment" srtranichka restarts and no message. the second time I repeated the same thing. the third time he did not, because it was then that there are two messages. Now try again.

03.02.2013 11:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.02.2013 11:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.02.2013 11:19, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

03.02.2013 11:19, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

03.02.2013 11:17, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, and after loading the site which he wrote? Retrieved or nothing? The page is reloaded?

03.02.2013 11:14, Lev Bely:

Lamproptera meges?

03.02.2013 5:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

eumedon.

03.02.2013 5:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

... or juvernica. :)

03.02.2013 5:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, rather two icarus. :)

03.02.2013 5:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Neptis hylas.

03.02.2013 5:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Neptis hylas.

03.02.2013 5:17, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

03.02.2013 5:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This is not the patch.

02.02.2013 20:45, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus icarus.

02.02.2013 20:43, Sergei Kotov:

Operophtera fagata.

02.02.2013 20:43, Sergei Kotov:

Operophtera fagata.

02.02.2013 20:43, Sergei Kotov:

Operophtera fagata.

02.02.2013 20:42, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana selene.

02.02.2013 20:42, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana selene.

02.02.2013 20:41, Sergei Kotov:

Brenthis ino.

02.02.2013 20:41, Sergei Kotov:

Rhyparia purpurata.

02.02.2013 20:38, Sergei Kotov:

Scotopteryx chenopodiata.

02.02.2013 20:37, Sergei Kotov:

Euthrix potatoria.

02.02.2013 20:37, Sergei Kotov:

Euthrix potatoria.

02.02.2013 20:32, Sergei Kotov:

Ematurga atomaria.

02.02.2013 20:31, Sergei Kotov:

Euthrix potatoria.

02.02.2013 20:25, Sergei Kotov:

Fabriciana adippe.

02.02.2013 20:23, Sergei Kotov:

Pieris napi.

02.02.2013 20:20, Sergei Kotov:

Polyommatus icarus.

02.02.2013 20:19, Sergei Kotov:

Cabera pusaria.

02.02.2013 20:18, Sergei Kotov:

Euthrix potatoria.

02.02.2013 20:17, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana selene (all).

02.02.2013 20:16, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana selene.

02.02.2013 20:16, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana selene.

02.02.2013 18:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Totally support Vasily's call, it's a must. Otherwise the website soon will become 101st picture gallery with nice photos.
Petr, do you really think there is not plenty of pics? :) I wouldn't say that. Remember what Vladimir Ilyich (Lenin) said. ;)

02.02.2013 17:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter twice uploaded comments on "the proposal to require pointing the authors place (geographically) and the time (date) shooting (particularly relevant for the determination of uncertain species)." And they are not there.

02.02.2013 16:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right, so what I identified yesterday may be moved, I see no variants. Tomorrow I'll be at home (with good connection), will look through more.

02.02.2013 15:53, Lev Bely:

Plebejus argus?

02.02.2013 14:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brenthis ino.

02.02.2013 14:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brenthis ino.

02.02.2013 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coenonympha pamphilus.

02.02.2013 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coenonympha pamphilus.

02.02.2013 14:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus thersites & Polyommatus icarus.

02.02.2013 14:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus.

02.02.2013 14:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus.

02.02.2013 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pseudopanthera macularia.

02.02.2013 13:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Carterocephalus palaemon.

02.02.2013 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena dispar.

02.02.2013 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus.

02.02.2013 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Araschnia levana.

02.02.2013 13:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's it.

02.02.2013 5:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

May be moved as well if from Moscow region.

02.02.2013 2:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.02.2013 2:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.02.2013 2:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.02.2013 2:53, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, in order to have a better understanding, I'd like to note that some photos are not uploaded by their authors, but I post those with photographers' permission. That may be the cases when location data lack.
As for the recent Alexey Gnilenkov's photos (which are this very case), so most of them were shot in Moscow region or Laos.
Therewith the appeal to authors to note the location keeps in force, though there will be no special upload restrictions to make it not possible to add photos without location noted, since we don't have plenty of pics in the gallery, and such restrictions will restrain growth. Still, it's easier to add the location to existing image than reupload it.

02.02.2013 2:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Limacodidae family. Identified by V. S. Kononenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS... Species is troublesome....

01.02.2013 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'd like to ask all to accept this as a mandatory upload condition. It's quite embarrassing to deal with some uncertain photo with no data, nothing to do but scratch own head wondering. Maybe not to add such photos at all. I think, many will appreciate that.

01.02.2013 21:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spilosoma lubricipeda.

01.02.2013 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aporia crataegi.

01.02.2013 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pieris brassicae.

01.02.2013 20:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Coenonympha glycerion?

01.02.2013 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Leptidea sinapis.

01.02.2013 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guys, don't forget to note the location always!

01.02.2013 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lymantria monacha female.

01.02.2013 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lymantria monacha female.

01.02.2013 12:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Lomaspilis marginata (Linnaeus, 1758). Identified by E. A. Belyaev.

01.02.2013 12:36, Peter Khramov:

Yury, if the autosuggestion doesn't work when you add a species name, that might mean that the species is not yet catalogued or maybe the very name differs. Thus photo can't be properly catalogued as belonging to some species, and the pic gets "undetermined" status. Like in this very case when the file was named Ampypira pyramidea whilst the right name is Amphipyra pyramidea (with "h"). Typos are quite common thing, easy to catch though: if the autosuggestion doesn't work, try to enter the genus name only and check what's the latter contains. If there is no such species, comment the photo with its name or just leave it as it's already named, and we, I myself or moderators, will check this later and correct if needed. Someday :--)

01.02.2013 7:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Ampypira pyramidea.

01.02.2013 7:10, Yuri Semejkin:

Ampypira pyramidea.

01.02.2013 7:09, Yuri Semejkin:

I already entered the names. Where are they? Ampypira pyramidea.

01.02.2013 4:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Identified by V. S. Kononenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

01.02.2013 4:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Identified by V. S. Kononenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

01.02.2013 3:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Identified by V. S. Kononenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

01.02.2013 3:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Identified by V. S. Kononenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

01.02.2013 3:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Identified by V. S. Kononenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

01.02.2013 3:54, Yuri Semejkin:

Got a permission to add the reference: identified by V. S. Kononenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

31.01.2013 10:26, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Petr, thanks! I see the website is progressing and improving! what's great! I just used to have daily discussions on birds.kz, and here instead few day breaks occur when nothing happens. :) Sure, each has its own specifics, and butterflies require meticulousness and diligence.

30.01.2013 19:40, Lev Bely:



The very name “bug hotel” could make one itch together with unpleasant reminiscences of someone's horror nights in Thailand journey. These days instead bugs may have an exclusive night-stop in London “bug hotels” that made up a real trend as of late. Such “lodges” were started as a conservation project in the British capital and then were continued by many people elsewhere in Britain.

In 2010 the City of London Corporation announced a competition to create a habitat to nurture and protect insects of London. That was won by the architecture firm ARUP that designed a bug hotel.

The hotel is meant mainly for attracting different bugs, the more the better.




It looks like a beehive with well-arranged cells, where bees, stag-beetles, butterflies and moths passing by may have a comfortable stay. The interiors are thought-out as well: each compartment is filled with recycled stuff and bio-waste so that inhabitants could feed, reproduce and nest, whilst the roof-top is equipped with a rainwater collector.

There are already five bug hotels in the City, and the number is growing. Past November the project has been supported by the City of London Corporation’s charity, the City Bridge Trust’s ‘Growing Localities’ programme. The charity has given £1 million in horticultural grants to help vulnerable young people get skills and jobs in the horticulture industry, including maintenance work on insect hotels. This undertaking was as well carried by many British enthusiasts that make their own bug hotels and recycle various materials to fill them out.



In the course of the renovation the original bug hotels were refilled with natural waste and treated with organic paints to protect them from premature decay caused by weather. Well, six-legged Londoners have one more reason to be proud of their City!

The Time Out London blog, http://now-here-this.timeout.com

Photo (1), (2), (3): bug hotels, The Time Out London blog, http://now-here-this.timeout.com

30.01.2013 0:16, Peter Khramov:

Guys, so what's about synonyms, can anybody clear this up?

29.01.2013 16:52, Peter Khramov:

Nice seat.

29.01.2013 16:48, Peter Khramov:

Thread continuing in part there: http://lepidoptera.pro/community/12274.

29.01.2013 12:56, Peter Khramov:

That's the question. Does the website need something of a message board in addition to the existing sections we've got? With threads like "Questions on the photo upload" or "Wishes/suggestions on the website" or "ID questions" (those which are over the discussion of a certain photo") or "Travel notes" and so forth?
P. S. To Dmitry Kurganov: you seem to have your mail account broken (550 Message was not accepted -- invalid mailbox), so please do share your thoughts on message board right here, also if possible would be great to have your mailbox fixed for contacts with others and either subscriptions.

28.01.2013 23:39, Peter Khramov:

As for distinctions between species, there is even a special section to add the info on the species description page, not very popular though, not many fill this out. If it can be designed another way, more handy, please tell me and I'll try to think it over.
As for discussions, so they get risen when someone has something opposite to what's said or something to add to the preceding message. Or she/he put a question like why decided like this or that. Species get IDs easily, one just name it without long consideration and explanations. Good that species get IDs whatsoever. Still some questions stay unanswered, for one a few from Lev who has been quite active as of late asking about photos, but he usually gets no reaction or little, and this all goes to Open case, and so on...
"You've got a new comment" mail feature will be enabled later. Now My subscriptions just appeared, so it's a short way to My mails.
If something left uncovered, feel free to continue the thread.

28.01.2013 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Thought the preview of a wing, not leaf.

28.01.2013 22:56, Peter Khramov:

Why nails always spoil everything.

28.01.2013 19:30, Lev Bely:

Acherontia atropos or simply death's head hawk moth captured the public imagination once again, this time not with its noted terrific skull-shaped pattern. The moth appeared to be able to peep, and according to the owner of the following video, the featured hawk moth is the only one that can peep in whole Denmark. Others just keep silent, perhaps?
Acherontia atropos is peeping

28.01.2013 18:40, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

28.01.2013 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Addition: female.

28.01.2013 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.01.2013 17:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lexias dirtea, nothing else on my mind.

28.01.2013 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.01.2013 15:34, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, thanks for the tip. Removed.

28.01.2013 14:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Glyukanat. "Family Hvostonosets Maak (Uraniidae)" http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/75 Nafig this hvostonostsa Maak is necessary to remove from there.

28.01.2013 11:40, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Good day! So I read it through and want to say something too. I'm not a professional biologist nor even a collector of butterflies or flowers, just an ordinary amateur photographer and thus I'm interested much more in the story of my pic and its value as well as that very butterfly or moth I shot. Erst I was curious too about why discussions were brief if ever happened, usually just one phrase informing that the photo got moved. Removals, for one, never discussed. Yury mentioned plantarium.ru where I'm as well engaged as possible. There the identification process and discussions are way more open and closer to people, local guys as are ready to argue as to explain, they give links and even guide you through identification keys, not to mention that you've got special message of that the discussion starts. Not to judge you, just wanted to encourage Yury :)

28.01.2013 10:16, Yuri Semejkin:

"Yury, why not to talk this over on the very species photo page"
Petr! I don't object discussions on the species photo page (when you know the thing you talk about), but there is plenty of lepidoptera (not necessarily mine) that actually have no any discussions about. Would be great to have so-called collage or summary to have distinctions clearly seen, even elaborated in this specific vernacular language of entomologists. Who wants, can find some additional info on the web.

28.01.2013 10:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, to "identified successfully".

28.01.2013 1:02, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, so what's about location, sure ID?

28.01.2013 1:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #20279.

28.01.2013 1:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #20279.

28.01.2013 1:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #20279.

28.01.2013 1:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.01.2013 0:59, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #20291.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #20291.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #20291.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #20291.

28.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

28.01.2013 0:56, Peter Khramov:

Yury, why not to talk this over on the very species photo page or on the taxon one? The final info may be added to species descriptions what's already enabled as a feature. In case this doesn't seem convenient, what will be better then? Let's consider and I'm ready to make necessary changes.

28.01.2013 0:54, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

28.01.2013 0:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "undetermined".

28.01.2013 0:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. capitella "uncertain".

27.01.2013 0:01, Lev Bely:

What would be a pure miracle now? Right, all these magical transformations from the Bear into a beautiful young man and backward, happy accidents and a lovely princess as ready to shoot down any stranger who dares to enter the castle as is to marry him right on the spot. Alas, in the 21st century of technologies no country left for such fairy things, Copperfield is revealed long ago and even most earnest believers put their water jugs off TV screens (see Kashpirovsky). Just it's winter, and freezing cold, all bears are sleeping and butterflies too. Anyway, all this can't hinder you, even isolated in winter amidst napping animals, from dancing along a good song. This one from the 1978 film An Ordinary Miracle is about many things but winter.
Butterfly Colors Song 2 and the video are made to help kids learn the names of the colours in English. I wonder, to have such video in Russian would be a pure wonder, wouldn't? And why there is still no any... Let me guess.
Khorosho, kogda zhenschina yest' (Good there is a woman here) from the film An Ordinary Miracle (Mark Zakharov, 1978)

Butterfly Colors Song 2, A. J. Jenkins (2012)

26.01.2013 17:20, Peter Khramov:

Any thoughts, to "uncertain" or what?

26.01.2013 15:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Same do I say :)

26.01.2013 15:02, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is definitely not Sciota fumella, hard to say what's this, hard lighting.

26.01.2013 15:00, Andrey Ponomarev:

I checked out once more on German website, so reckon this is Sciota fumella.

26.01.2013 14:55, Andrey Ponomarev:

Right, Petr, Sciota rhenella has photos of a different specimen.

26.01.2013 10:48, Yuri Semejkin:

"Yury, why not to pose questions from amateurs to pros right now, what does the website lack?"
Petr! I'd like at times to know something more of taxonomy, to understand the core of a certain ID, to have some clear photo (drawing) explaining the thing.
It comes often that not only I can't identify the specimen but may even confuse families, like with this moth, which I deemed tortrix before Alexandr identified it like one of a different family. It might be easy for someone deeply involved, but for others who just have a casual interest like hobby, this may be rather tough thing. Anyway, would be great to fill this gap at least a bit.

26.01.2013 0:25, Lev Bely:

Evgeny, please check this http://s14.postimage.org/4i0acns1t/16235_1.jpg., I encircled the "patch" in red? So I read there http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&st=1050 Vlad Proklov who said that " Thymelicus sylvestris has thick and oblique androconial patch whilst Th. lineola does thin and nearly parallel to the back margin". Thus I spotted male inside a female:)

25.01.2013 22:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) It's a bit more complicated, I checked species of Sciota genus, nearly all Vitaly's IDs are doubtful. Will try to sort them out, not sure will be successful though :(

25.01.2013 21:43, Andrey Ponomarev:

Petr, didn't get the q about different speciment.
As for Sciota fumella, I rechecked it there after Vlad: http://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Sciota_Fumella.

25.01.2013 18:38, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

25.01.2013 18:37, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the confirmation, moved.

25.01.2013 18:36, Peter Khramov:

Andrey, Sciota rhenella has photos of different specimen?

25.01.2013 18:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.01.2013 18:34, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

25.01.2013 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calamotropha paludella.

25.01.2013 17:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calamotropha paludella.

25.01.2013 14:04, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Why, I like Vlad so much. It's very him who identified 99% of my moths, and I do appreciate that.
I supposed to sort them out since this photo illustrates both species.

25.01.2013 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely not Sciota rhenella. The original ID is right, don't you find Vlad Proklov a pro?

25.01.2013 12:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yury, I myself apply to Matov in difficult cases. What you suggest is already realized on molbiol.ru, http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?act=SF&s=&f=40, where they got discussions and somewhat non classified images by group. Here instead everything's classified, dicussions are separated though.

25.01.2013 12:42, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Probably, Scoparia pyralella.

25.01.2013 12:35, Vitaly Gumenuk:

May this be Sciota rhenella? A pro to come and sort out photos of these two species.

25.01.2013 11:59, Peter Khramov:

Yury, why not to pose questions from amateurs to pros right now, what does the website lack?

25.01.2013 10:22, Yuri Semejkin:

There do exist websites with such discussions already, but with cuts amidst you all (first, taxonomists), maybe we should engage amateurs with their dilettante questions, why not? Besides, some realized and use that. Truth should be sought.

25.01.2013 10:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Why, this may depend on how good one knows a certain group. There is an Eastern proverb "Teacher grows being learned from everybody". We might create kind of plantarium website where amateurs can talk to pros (which are, in fact, few on here). Sure, pros don't have much time, but at least some things get answered, and many people will be able to know more... Maybe, things get better in Russia with that.

24.01.2013 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is Lycia hirtaria male (first, Apocheima pilosaria has a different abdomen).

24.01.2013 19:54, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

24.01.2013 19:54, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

24.01.2013 19:51, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

24.01.2013 19:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

ID by photo can be a wrong thing, whilst I compared this one to pics on other websites, Matov has at hand the WHOLE collection of the Zoological Institute RAS, obviously, he should know better :)

24.01.2013 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

24.01.2013 12:54, Boris Lariushin:

In Knautia flower.

24.01.2013 12:54, Boris Lariushin:

2012-07-18 13:40:00, Estonia, Ida-Virumaa, the Zarya garden community, on the meadow. I uploaded the whole archive and added data right after the upload.

24.01.2013 4:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Can't see the patch... The tip of the abdomen is shaped like of a female.

24.01.2013 2:22, Yuri Semejkin:

A. Y. Matov from the Zoological Institute RAS has different opinion, I cite him below, with his consent:
"I deem this moth is Cosmia unicolor (Staudinger,1892), a close relative of the trans-palearctic C. affinis (which is in Primorye too), from which the first one differs with pattern and colour. Cosmia camptostigma looks a little bit different (also larger in average).
All the best,
Yury.

24.01.2013 2:00, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved. To correct Alexandr's reply: for uncertain IDs there is a special checkbox (Species is identified) "Tentatively" to mark, or if you seriously doubt then just note the ID with a question sign in the "author's comment" field. But this doubt may be different, especially when someone else took part in the ID, from molbiol.ru for one...

24.01.2013 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Nearly two years passed and the moth has already become a citizen.

24.01.2013 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Guys, thanks for the ID. Photo moved.

24.01.2013 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Also this: if you can identify no more than genus or any higher taxon, please note that as "author's comment". This kind of taxa will be used later, not now.

23.01.2013 22:46, Sergey Ionov:

Petr, thanks. I'm a newbie here so not fully got the structures, and myself too far from the taxonomy issues. Anyway, will try to set it out.

23.01.2013 22:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thus the thing is in some bugs on upload. Anyway, better to have photos wrongly named :) than to have nothing to correct :(

23.01.2013 22:09, Vitaly Gumenuk:

I don't ID anything myself. They help me on molbiol.ru. When possible, I recheck the info.

23.01.2013 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree. :)

23.01.2013 21:19, Andrey Ponomarev:

Why, guess this is Udea fulvalis.

23.01.2013 21:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Udea, can't get the species sadly.

23.01.2013 21:06, Evgeny Komarov:

The photo linked and this specimen quite differ consdering that there are number of similar species of the genus.

23.01.2013 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

23.01.2013 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Aphomia sociella, another family, Calamotropha paludella. Vitaly, in case you've got no sure ID, please note your guess in the "author's comment" field and don't name the very specimen. If you're right, your ID will be noted, if not, moth will stay "undetermined".

23.01.2013 20:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Aphomia sociella, another family, Calamotropha paludella. Vitaly, in case you've got no sure ID, please note your guess in the "author's comment" field and don't name the very specimen. If you're right, your ID will be noted, if not, moth will stay "undetermined".

23.01.2013 20:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

This photo allows to guess just family and genus, Coleophoridae, Coleophora in Western system, and family only in Eastern.

23.01.2013 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Incurvaria oehlmanniella, another family, likely Lampronia capitella, maybe that one exactly. :)

23.01.2013 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Great, moved.

23.01.2013 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.01.2013 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

23.01.2013 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.01.2013 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

23.01.2013 17:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.01.2013 14:15, Lev Bely:

Whats' about the androconial patch on its fore wing? I based on that supposing lineola male.

23.01.2013 11:07, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Thanks! Will try another browser.

23.01.2013 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata.

23.01.2013 4:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Lineola, seems the female though. :)

23.01.2013 4:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

lineola.

23.01.2013 4:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Acraea violae.

23.01.2013 4:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Acraea violae.

23.01.2013 4:09, Eugene Karolinskiy:

lineola.

23.01.2013 4:09, Eugene Karolinskiy:

vaualbum.

23.01.2013 1:26, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved from "undetermined" to E. crepusculata "uncertain".

23.01.2013 0:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yep, "uncertain" :)

23.01.2013 0:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's the only one photo on the linked website for 8 years the species has been on the web and that forum, so questionable. Also not sure that's the same species we've got here. Visually, at least. There are pics of this moth on http://www.lepbarcoding.org, named Diaphania sp. though. I'd wait for some sure thing. :)

23.01.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov:

On the way, it's on the way.

22.01.2013 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, what about this new one?

22.01.2013 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Enough for "uncertain"?

22.01.2013 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.01.2013 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.01.2013 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Male moved.

22.01.2013 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

22.01.2013 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved, "uncertain".

22.01.2013 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

22.01.2013 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.01.2013 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

22.01.2013 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.01.2013 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

22.01.2013 23:12, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

22.01.2013 23:12, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

22.01.2013 22:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Anania hortulata.

22.01.2013 21:30, Peter Khramov:

Ah, I've got it. This is some special bug when some pics are not seen in Chrome and overblued in IE. Viktor, you use Chrome, I guess? They got to fix it in new versions, now bugging again... I'll repair all the pics then.
P.S. All mentioned above should happen only with old photos. If you experience any bugs with newly uploaded images (12—13 yy.), please do let me know.

22.01.2013 21:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lampronia corticella.

22.01.2013 21:10, Peter Khramov:

Beauty.

22.01.2013 20:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eupithecia centaureata.

22.01.2013 20:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Anania hortulata.

22.01.2013 20:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Enargia paleacea.

22.01.2013 20:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acronicta rumicis.

22.01.2013 20:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hydraecia micacea.

22.01.2013 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mythimna impura, questionable.

22.01.2013 20:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polia bombycina.

22.01.2013 20:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male.

22.01.2013 20:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agrotis segetum.

22.01.2013 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Anarta trifolii.

22.01.2013 20:12, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

22.01.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

22.01.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.01.2013 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Well, rookie can object quite fiercely) Thanks for your uploads, your pics make up a large part of the website gallery!

22.01.2013 15:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eulithis prunata.

22.01.2013 15:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eulithis pyropata.

22.01.2013 14:19, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Likely Ectropis crepuscularia.

22.01.2013 14:16, Vitaly Gumenuk:

I think this is Actinotia polyodon.

22.01.2013 1:02, Peter Khramov:

Home "Communities" further modified. It should now be seen all over at once. And yes, now the same comments are not duplicated in different sections. Ie if comments have already shown in the "recent comments" in the "Picture comments" we observe the fifteenth time will not.

21.01.2013 23:26, Lev Bely:


North America's largest indoor butterfly pavilion Butterfly Wonderland is being constructed in the Salt River Reservation, AZ (US) as a part of a larger entertainment complex called Odysea in the Desert. The pavilion will include a theater, chrysalis room and a conservancy area with butterflies freely flying around until they get released into the wild.
Butterfly Wonderland, which is to be opened in the second quarter of 2013, is just a first phase of the Odysea in the Desert construction that required 35-acres of land and $170 million. About 50 workers are on site every day at the northeastern corner of the Pima Freeway and Via De Ventura. The very pavilion that spread to 5 acres is scheduled to open in late April. This project makes up an addition to the chain of already existing the Salt River Fields spring-training baseball complex, two golf courses and the Talking Stick Resort and Casino.
Amram Knishinsky, the principal partner funding the Odysea, says that Butterfly Wonderland visitors will “embark on an enchanting journey through the life of a butterfly” via educational and interactive exhibits, leading up to the experience of walking among thousands of butterflies inside a glass atrium with tropical plants and waterfalls.
“We plan to import the butterflies from various tropical rain forests throughout the world, but that is going to take place closer to the opening date,” Knishinsky said. “We're going to bring them from Costa Rica, Brazil, the Philippines and some areas of Africa. They come in cocoons and go through the process in our laboratories.”
Some domestic butterflies from Florida will be also brought to the pavilion.
Knishinsky noted that the U.S. Department of Agriculture has approved the design of the pavilion, as well as the procedures for bringing the butterflies into the country.
In addition, Butterfly Wonderland will include a 3-D, stadium-seating butterfly theater, as well as aquarium displays, a children's play area, retail shop and cafe, Knishinsky said.
The Central Arizona Butterfly Association is excited about Butterfly Wonderland, said Adriane Grimaldi, a member.
“It gives another opportunity for the public to learn about the wonders of butterflies,” she said. “They are truly amazing — their life cycle, the process they go through. This type of facility gives people of all ages the chance to see butterflies up close all year long.”
The Scottsdale Convention & Visitors Bureau expects Butterfly Wonderland will be a positive addition to the area's tourist offerings.
“We are thrilled to welcome Butterfly Wonderland to the greater Scottsdale area in 2013,” said Megan Neighbor, the bureau's communications coordinator. “Much like the Musical Instrument Museum or Taliesin West (architect Frank Lloyd Wright's winter home), Butterfly Wonderland promises to be another world-class attraction that will serve as a strong economic driver for the tourism community.”
The Republic, http://www.therepublic.com
Photo: Butterfly Wonderland construction in Scottsdale, AZ, CTVNews.ca, http://www.ctvnews.ca

21.01.2013 22:25, Vitaly Gumenuk:

What objections may rookie have? :-))) Tomorrow, the day after I'll finish uploading moths and then will show up in September-October with a new catch.

21.01.2013 21:30, Peter Khramov:

Vitaly, any objections?

21.01.2013 16:26, Vitaly Gumenuk:

I've got 22 shots of Rhyacionia (buoliana and pinicolana all mingled). Don't know, what they differ with (can't see myself), so keep them in one place :-(

21.01.2013 11:55, Lev Bely:

Diaphania mirabilis?

21.01.2013 11:54, Lev Bely:

Diaphania mirabilis?

21.01.2013 11:53, Lev Bely:

It might be Diaphania mirabilis, http://www.insecte.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2175.

21.01.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov:

As it's summarized on there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/6273, the photo goes back to "undetermined".

21.01.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov:

As it's summarized on there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/6273, the photo goes back to "undetermined".

21.01.2013 11:49, Peter Khramov:

As it's summarized on there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/6273, the photo is moved back to "undetermined".

21.01.2013 2:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

4 out of 7 are right IDs and 3 aren't.

21.01.2013 2:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nah, not right. There are only three of them with Diaphania nitidalis, the rest what Lev IDed are quite questionable, it's a different species.

20.01.2013 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not sure, I think the thing is in browser settings, connection and computer, which are being used. I've just checked the website with my main comp using WinXp and then with Android smartphone (both connected through router to one provider and have Opera browsers), so the website works good. Viktor seems to have to change some settings or something of the kind.

20.01.2013 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Viktor, please give me a link to check it out.

20.01.2013 20:50, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Please why some pics aren't seen in the Catalogue as well as on other pages? About each 20th pic is seen as an empty frame though when I point at it I can see the info the image exists.

20.01.2013 20:27, Andrey Ponomarev:

Angle isn't great. To "uncertain".

20.01.2013 20:04, Andrey Ponomarev:

This one and the next pic seem to be the same specimen.

20.01.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.01.2013 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.01.2013 19:38, Peter Khramov:

So if this is still held on, what's with other photos of Diaphania nitidalis, if they're actually identified right?

20.01.2013 19:34, Peter Khramov:

Waiting for the underside, moved to S. hypselis "uncertain".

20.01.2013 19:32, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. poulardi "uncertain". More opinions welcome.

20.01.2013 19:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far. Anybody anything to say?

20.01.2013 17:10, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Another angle shot, maybe? Or to crop some part close up? Just it never opened its underside...

20.01.2013 16:35, Peter Khramov:

Seems fairly tough thing...

20.01.2013 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

20.01.2013 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

20.01.2013 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.01.2013 16:32, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Or to "uncertain"?

20.01.2013 16:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved from E. tundrana to "undetermined".

20.01.2013 16:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" and "Open case".

20.01.2013 16:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far and "Open case".

20.01.2013 16:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved from E. venustula.

20.01.2013 16:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved from A. betulana.

20.01.2013 16:27, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

20.01.2013 16:25, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" so far.

20.01.2013 16:24, Peter Khramov:

And no any angles more...

20.01.2013 16:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.01.2013 16:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.01.2013 16:22, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.01.2013 16:21, Peter Khramov:

Any opinions more? Or to "uncertain"?

20.01.2013 16:19, Peter Khramov:

What's with synonyms (see comments http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/20144)? Or bug?

20.01.2013 16:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.01.2013 14:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to H. salicella. The photo was uploaded 2 years ago, so now we can barely get to know if he actually had some trouble with upload back then.

20.01.2013 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

I see this should be moved.

20.01.2013 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.01.2013 14:12, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Rhyacionia pinicolana as well, check Rhyacionia buoliana on http://www.lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Rhyacionia_Buoliana, distinctions are obvious.

20.01.2013 13:46, Peter Khramov:

Vitaly, agree? Andrey, the same is on the neighbour photo? To all, if these two species are synonyms?

20.01.2013 13:41, Lev Bely:

Right, pity moth app is for Applers exclusively. At least you can view Nature Trek even on personal comp, I tried, curious thing.

20.01.2013 11:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Technical aspect is a sad thing. Why Apple iOS only? All is for Apple users. Bastards....... Android OS is passed by. Not good.

20.01.2013 11:02, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Rhyacionia pinicolana. I checked this on German website http://lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Fotouebersicht_Schmetterlingsfamilien_8.

19.01.2013 23:33, Lev Bely:

Some Cepora?

19.01.2013 23:26, Lev Bely:

Eurema simulatrix?

19.01.2013 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2013 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vitaly has some trouble with upload so that the species identified right come up incorrectly named.

19.01.2013 22:04, Andrey Ponomarev:

How come Hedya salicella got there?

19.01.2013 21:57, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is rather Celypha sp., probably Celypha rivulana.

19.01.2013 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2013 21:44, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is clearly not Pandemis corylana by its pattern. Most likely Archips oporana female.

19.01.2013 21:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Already added. Delias hyparete.

19.01.2013 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Delias hyparete, Linnaeus, 1758 likely to be. I'll add the species in a moment.

19.01.2013 20:51, Lev Bely:

Diaphania costata? There is similar one http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/6333.

19.01.2013 20:45, Lev Bely:

This crookback moth is incredible indeed, pity not identified.

19.01.2013 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Iphiclides podalirius.

19.01.2013 20:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eilema griseola, "uncertain" again.

19.01.2013 20:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Don't you forget to provide each photo with location and the shot date!!!
Supposedly Nemophora metallica.

19.01.2013 20:29, Lev Bely:

Belenois java?

19.01.2013 20:09, Lev Bely:

Thymelicus lineola? Male.

19.01.2013 17:43, Sergei Kotov:

Mellicta athalia (Rottemburg, 1775).

19.01.2013 16:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong ID, this is Hedya ochroleucana.

19.01.2013 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong ID, this is Pseudeustrotia candidula.

19.01.2013 16:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong ID, this is Pseudeustrotia candidula.

19.01.2013 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think this is wrongly identified.

19.01.2013 16:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think, this species is identified wrongly.

19.01.2013 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

This tortrix moth is of the different subfamily, Cochylini tribe, can't say more by such moth condition and angle. :(

19.01.2013 14:44, Lev Bely:

Rap metal was born in the late 1980s when rappers and metal fans were still violently fighting head-to-head. Music however leaves no place for limits and fights, so today those who love rap metal have a whole range of bands to enjoy, say, Reveille from Massachusetts, which despite sadly broke up in 2003 still released a couple of albums. The debut one, Laced (1999), opens with the “Butterfly”, which is genuinely surprising to meet such ethereal things in this mean sound and vociferation.
The young progressive rock band Butterfly Convict from Long Island isn't well-known, except that just as Reveille they've already broken up last summer having the same two albums released. Albeit songs may sound a little bit over dramatic, it seems that guys could eventually make up something really interesting. Till then, sweat and tears in Opus One from their debut homonymous album Butterfly Convict.
Reveille, Butterfly (Laced, 1999)

Butterfly Convict, Opus One (Butterfly Convict, 2010)

19.01.2013 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Got to be Clepsis spectrana, assumedly.

19.01.2013 3:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

tityrus.

19.01.2013 3:51, Eugene Karolinskiy:

athalia.

19.01.2013 3:51, Eugene Karolinskiy:

athalia.

19.01.2013 3:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Aberrant type; unlikely didyma.

19.01.2013 3:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ypthima asterope.

19.01.2013 3:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ypthima asterope.

19.01.2013 3:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

diamina.

18.01.2013 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Why the icarus not confirmed yet?

18.01.2013 16:07, Peter Khramov:

Some users had problems with the output messages in "My subscriptions". Gluck treat, now this section should work correctly for all users.
ZY Date / time of comments in the Community, which have been left less than 24 hours ago, is now highlighted.

18.01.2013 15:19, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

18.01.2013 15:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.01.2013 15:18, Peter Khramov:

Replaced with a new file.

18.01.2013 14:50, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Double, might be removed.

18.01.2013 13:40, Peter Khramov:

Removed another one.

18.01.2013 13:30, Vitaly Gumenuk:

This double to delete.

18.01.2013 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pleuroptya ruralis.

18.01.2013 13:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spoladea recurvalis.

18.01.2013 12:30, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Done.

18.01.2013 12:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.01.2013 11:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyles gallii.

18.01.2013 10:50, Andrey Ponomarev:

Vitaly, please share this pic on molbiol.ru to ID, I guess they can help.

18.01.2013 10:22, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Pros are in doubt... Might be as well Dudusa distincta Mell, 1930 http://macroclub.ru/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/101434. We took pictures of the same moth. Your thoughts?

17.01.2013 23:13, Vitaly Gumenuk:

I got it labeled as this, can't remember who made the ID. Might be mistake, they're similar. Some real pro's conclusion needed.

17.01.2013 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Vitaly, please comment... Some bug on upload?..

17.01.2013 17:43, Lev Bely:


The Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa, Canada, released two new and free web apps, first of a kind for the museum.
Earlier we covered Jim des Rivières' travelling exhibition Winged Tapestries: Moths at Large that featured large size portrayals of the fabulous Ottawa moths, and now most of them are available to watch in a homonymous web app for iPad users. This application may be downloaded from the Apple store, and what's more, it's the only free Moths app for today. Designed in English, Spanish and French, it shows those amazing moths, art and science combined. Winged Tapestries: Moths at Large is on display at the American Museum of Natural History (New York, US), where it will last until September 29.
The web app enlightens about some curious things of moth life, say, their ability to discern colours in the dark, or what's the difference between butterflies and moths. Spectacular full-size images of each species are added with data on range expansion, Latin and common names, and location. This application reflects the main idea of the exhibit, where moths appear in such unordinary large size with the tiniest details of their body, a real wonder for most of the exhibition visitors, which otherwise may never know of these amazing structures.
The second web app Nature Trek offers a virtual tour through the museum's nature-themed galleries and collections, and its spotlights. Curators Judith Price and Jean-Marc Gagnon demonstrate in short but exciting “show and tell” videos some creepy, rare or just giant specimens, to name cockroaches, turkey vulture, parasites, or even catchy 19-metre blue whale. Sea stars for one, slugs for another, and plenty to know of the unique occupants of the museum. Those who seek for additional fun would get some with a set of bloopers.
Nature Trek is available for most smartphones and tablets. Winged Tapestries is for iPad only. Download the apps on the museum website: http://nature.ca/en/explore-nature/mobile-apps/nature-trek. Nature Trek can be as well viewed on a desktop computer, follow Get the app link on http://nature.ca/en/explore-nature/mobile-apps/nature-trek.
The Canadian Museum of Nature, former National Museum of Natural Sciences, is located at 240 McLeod Street, Ottawa. More information on http://nature.ca.
Canadian Museum of Nature, http://nature.ca
Photo: Nature Trek web app, http://nature.ca
Canadian Museum of Nature in Ottawa

17.01.2013 16:42, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is not Spatalia argentina, suppose Notodonta ziczac, might be wrong though.

16.01.2013 22:12, Lev Bely:

Polyommatus something...:) Anyway thanks.

16.01.2013 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

The butterfly you linked is Polyommatus.

16.01.2013 21:52, Lev Bely:

Polyommatus icarus?

16.01.2013 21:31, Lev Bely:

Polyommatus amandus?

16.01.2013 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.01.2013 19:34, Peter Khramov:

Sent you an e-mail.

16.01.2013 19:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.01.2013 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

16.01.2013 19:06, Lev Bely:

Sorry for offtop, Alexandr, what do you think this can be http://www.flickr.com/photos/legless2007/5820855135/? Beginning of June, Turkey.

16.01.2013 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right, it's definitely described in French Guiana: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_sphingidae_1.htm#top.

16.01.2013 17:00, Andrey Ponomarev:

"Other photos of the specimen" well, I find it hard to handle.

16.01.2013 16:43, Andrey Ponomarev:

Faulty ID, this is Apocheima pilosaria female.

16.01.2013 16:07, Peter Khramov:

By the way, it's done, two years haven't passed.

16.01.2013 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cerura vinula.

16.01.2013 15:59, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, you often add photos with the IDs, which yet are not linked with the catalogue species. So if you have some troubles with a field "Species name" on upload or with editing data in your personal account on the website, please e-mail me or create a new post in the Community, and we'll clear the things up.

16.01.2013 15:57, Peter Khramov:

The author identified it right, just didn't manage to link the photo with the ID properly. Just fixed it. Vitaly, such mislinking happens due to you incorrectly write the species name like c album without hyphen whilst the catalogue name actually has hyphen (c-album).

16.01.2013 15:48, Peter Khramov:

Dunno if this is athalia, but it doesn't look anyway similar to didyma. Anybody can comment?

16.01.2013 12:16, Peter Khramov:

Oh yes, commented about mistyping and didn't move the photo. I'll do it right now, thanks for the nudge.

16.01.2013 9:32, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Why there is antiopa?

15.01.2013 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Would like to say it again, it's never bad to confirm the ID. It's not about that the one who identified would have no doubt, but lest other people have any, since those might know nothing of the species, if it's common or not, neither know anything at all.

15.01.2013 22:20, Peter Khramov:

To Vitaly and all photographers as well, please let's not add dry specimens two things at once in one photo. This way (easier to compare) is good for guides and home archives, while the photos on the website can be used and selected in many ways, and it's just two clicks for to have two separate pics before the eyes, instead such double photos make the search quite more complicated. So if any of you think differently, I'm open for discussion.

15.01.2013 22:18, Lev Bely:

Not the one. Probably, such athalia: http://www.naturefg.com/pages/c-animals/melitaea%20athalia.htm.

15.01.2013 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Any thoughts anyone? olieus or not?

15.01.2013 22:02, Lev Bely:

Again not cinxia. Melitaea athalia?

15.01.2013 21:25, Lev Bely:

You were the first to ID this, Alexandr. I was just about to suppose hyperantus though was doubtful since have poor knowledge of them. The moment I was exploring them on lepiforum.de, you got to write the name. Thus I confirmed.

15.01.2013 21:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thanks for the confirmation :)

15.01.2013 20:44, Lev Bely:

Not cinxia. Same Athalia?

15.01.2013 20:38, Lev Bely: This species is identified correctly.

15.01.2013 20:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aphantopus hyperantus.

15.01.2013 20:09, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

15.01.2013 20:08, Lev Bely:

Polygonia c-album?

15.01.2013 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

The genus is Adhemarius, species is either this or that, so if Lev says this location is for Adhemarius roessleri, don't object :), just to "uncertain".

15.01.2013 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

White stripe is possible but not always. Clearly distinguished by black spots arranged in a straight line.

15.01.2013 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

15.01.2013 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Arhopala centaurus just as other photos of the specimen.

15.01.2013 19:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved from semiargus to amandus.

15.01.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved from phlaeas to dispar.

15.01.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.01.2013 19:37, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

15.01.2013 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.01.2013 19:34, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

15.01.2013 14:14, Lev Bely:

Pity for such an eagle to get lost in "undetermined". They say there http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/aypsilon.htm that these two were one species before Eitschberger in 2002 described roessleri as a separate sp. and excluded ypsilon from French Guiana. Also, ypsilon looks darker and more contrast, personal opinion, of course.

15.01.2013 13:37, Sergei Kotov:

This is Polyommatus amandus!

15.01.2013 13:36, Sergei Kotov:

This is Lycaena dispar!

15.01.2013 13:24, Sergei Kotov:

This is Smerinthus ocellatа!

15.01.2013 13:23, Sergei Kotov:

This is Smerinthus ocellatа.

15.01.2013 13:23, Sergei Kotov:

This is Laothoe populi!

15.01.2013 13:22, Sergei Kotov:

This is Laothoe populi!

15.01.2013 12:01, Peter Khramov:

OK understood. The author can view put down within an hour of downloading or later, too - if the view was neprikrepelnnym to mind. If more than an hour or phot already attached to another species - can not then.I therefore propose to close up the possibility for the modders themselves migrate to the species foty that there is no such layers, they say, if the author of the brake and modernization have already had - it means, the definition of those who view the comments wills. Who thinks what?

15.01.2013 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Curious specimen. Little bit asymmetrical.

14.01.2013 23:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author's comment is to another species Malacosoma neustria.

14.01.2013 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Malacosoma castrensis.

14.01.2013 20:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes. Author's definition was not, I was surprised and put her, but now it may be in the process. The author puts a photo, and then exposes the definition. Here, perhaps, who had managed to not go. The author should be given priority.

14.01.2013 20:04, Peter Khramov:

I think Vitaly's right about worn-out specimens, they're of need. Extras — see above. As for smaller size photos, let's take time since I've got original size photos for most of them, so one of the future goal is to upload these larger size pics. The thing is that I can't just change the prior photo with a new one, the very files need to be changed whilst the new ones already uploaded with all copyrights and stuff.

14.01.2013 19:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "undetermined".

14.01.2013 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

14.01.2013 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. aurinia.

14.01.2013 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved to E. aurinia.

14.01.2013 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 19:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.01.2013 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.01.2013 19:55, Lev Bely:

What's about the white stripe on the hind wing from the centre to the wing margin? Or not all eumedon have it?

14.01.2013 19:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 19:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.01.2013 19:52, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 19:52, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 19:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.01.2013 19:51, Peter Khramov:

Pity. Moved.

14.01.2013 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, kind of.

14.01.2013 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

14.01.2013 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

14.01.2013 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

14.01.2013 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

14.01.2013 19:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. ladonides "uncertain".

14.01.2013 19:46, Peter Khramov:

Guys, if you somehow have no answers, please do comment not to keep cases open...

14.01.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov:

Any thoughts? Leave it in "undetermined"?

14.01.2013 19:45, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. gannascus "uncertain". Any opinions more welcome.

14.01.2013 19:43, Peter Khramov:

He published all the pictures that have been uploaded by the old system. Now just go postmoderatsiya. A few days later a new variant, I think, ustakanilos, respectively, see what comes out of it, it was felt, better / worse.

14.01.2013 19:12, Evgeny Komarov:

To "uncertain"! Evgeny's right, there is no argiolus in Primorye region.

14.01.2013 17:38, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Fabriciana adippe!

14.01.2013 17:37, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Euphydryas aurinia!

14.01.2013 17:37, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Euphydryas aurinia!

14.01.2013 17:36, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Clossiana dia!

14.01.2013 17:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as the same photo of the species. "Uncertain" so far.

14.01.2013 17:33, Sergei Kotov:

Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus, 1758).

14.01.2013 17:28, Sergei Kotov:

Phyllodesma tremulifolium.

14.01.2013 17:28, Sergei Kotov:

Phyllodesma tremulifolium.

14.01.2013 17:26, Sergei Kotov:

Phyllodesma tremulifolium.

14.01.2013 17:18, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Hypomecis roboraria!

14.01.2013 17:10, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Cleora cinctaria!

14.01.2013 17:09, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Epirrita autumnata!

14.01.2013 17:09, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Epirrita autumnata!

14.01.2013 17:09, Sergei Kotov:

Epirrita autumnata.

14.01.2013 17:08, Sergei Kotov:

No, this one is Epirrita autumnata!

14.01.2013 17:07, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Ennomos erosariа.

14.01.2013 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, you're talking about a couple of gonepteryx definition written when the author was not yet?

14.01.2013 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

14.01.2013 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.01.2013 0:39, Peter Khramov:

Yet to "uncertain"...

13.01.2013 22:35, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Can't make everything right on the first try, neither see always what pics are already added. Some shots I upload when the present ones of small size and can't be zoomed. As for worn-out, not sure such can't be used for ID, can't always have just emerged. As for extras, please remove freely :-)

13.01.2013 21:54, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, I see not all the photographers easily handle with this new free of moderation upload. No big deal, I will gradually remove all extras. Vitaly, I guess, didn't even check out if the species was illustrated or not :--)

13.01.2013 21:44, Sergey Ionov:

Thanks, keep in mind.

13.01.2013 21:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

They don't overwinter, just had an intensive spring :)

13.01.2013 21:14, Sergey Ionov: This species is identified correctly.

13.01.2013 20:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Gonepteryx rhamni.

13.01.2013 19:02, Lev Bely:

What an amazing pic.

13.01.2013 18:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

What for add two photos of the same, quite worn-out specimen, whilst the species itself is already illustrated with dozen more good pics?

13.01.2013 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Check how much this is similar to one http://www.lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Crassa_Tinctella. With such angle and colour...

13.01.2013 17:15, Andrey Ponomarev:

Phyllodesma tremulifolia.

13.01.2013 17:14, Andrey Ponomarev:

Phyllodesma tremulifolia it is.

13.01.2013 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Malacosoma neustria, or what for this would crawl along the apple tree. :)

13.01.2013 15:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Malacosoma neustria.

13.01.2013 15:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Malacosoma neustria.

13.01.2013 15:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Malacosoma neustria.

13.01.2013 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrong ID, this moth is of the genus Phyllodesma.

12.01.2013 23:22, Lev Bely:

First, there is a short story to tell. In the memorable 100-meter men's sprint of the Olympics 2012 in London a British gentleman Ashley Gill-Webb being presumably in high spirits (beer as well, they say), threw a bottle on to the track allegedly aiming at the future champion. The abuser failed, so the race ended with Usain Bolt's win, whilst the very Gill-Webb got unlucky twice since his neighbour was no less than the Dutch world judo champion Edith Bosch who immediately hit him on the back and detained before the security came. The day before yesterday Gill-Webb was eventually found guilty after six-month trial, and now awaiting sentencing he's probably feeling a little bit sad of those good times when a man could afford such a prank not being afraid to be ignominously seized by withers, whilst women were all and sundry “dollies” and didn't consider judo as whatsoever worth considering.
Not to mention Dolly Parton, which very name sends us into the past where she reigns as a classic “dolly” girl with her hair of gold, angel voice and “The Queen of Country Music” title. Even Dolly the sheep was named after Parton, or, to be more accurate, after one of Parton's body part. Well, there were times and there were dollies, which sang harmless songs like Parton's 1974 single “Love is Like a Butterfly”, songs that however became number-one hits.
Today it's rather grown men who play dolls, say, Chris Ballew who manages to play in the alternative rock band The Presidents of the United States of America and at the same time to compose music for children under the stage name Caspar Babypants. For the song “Butterfly Driving A Truck” from the album Sing Along! Chris with mates made in one day this colourful video, which can be used for learning colours, sounds, butterflies, Latin alphabet, puppet cinema, or just for having fun, alone and with anyone nearby.
Dolly Parton, Love is Like a Butterfly (1974)

Caspar Babypants, Butterfly Driving A Truck (Sing Along!, 2011)

12.01.2013 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

I see we'd better leave it as "larva" (development stage) and tag with it all nests, mines, cases and whatsoever else. "Pupa" is for cocoons, exuviae and so on. "Egg" is for egg-layings etc.

12.01.2013 22:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

To move to another photo, shouldn't be hovering in "undetermined". :)

12.01.2013 21:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as #16645.

12.01.2013 21:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as #16645.

12.01.2013 21:31, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

12.01.2013 21:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cosmia camptostigma.

12.01.2013 20:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Most probably this is Celastrina ladonides (de l'Orza, 1867), not quite sure though.

12.01.2013 20:14, Evgeny Komarov:

If I knew, would put it first. Got it as ssp. poseidon many years ago from reliable hands.

12.01.2013 20:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Either this or that, I see A. roessleri. There are actually many similar species in that neck of the woods...

12.01.2013 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Pre-moderation system previously practiced shots when you first upload photos to the site, and then I have them processed / check / select, then published ostavshietsya, replaced by a system postmoderatsii. Now the photos you upload, enter immediately into the gallery site .And I have ex-post passers-by the published photographs, delete unnecessary duplicates, if necessary, retouch, etc.
In this regard, a photographer is now a little more responsibility.If possible, prepare images for publication (Retouch) and look before downloading - perhaps much like your pictures a day peacock eye on the site for more than. Or vice versa, for some kind of illustrations on the site at all.Accordingly, the jackdaw, "Please do not edit" is now in the form of boot, and that all newly uploaded pictures deemed fotami no editing on the site. It was only as a result of postmoderatsii if editing is still carried out, put a note to snapshots "With the editing on the site."
SinceNow boot ph program on the site do more than before, in some cases (for example, if one archive download a lot ph), it can not cope on time with all the puzzles and bring you instead of the coveted posts of the successful loading white screen . This means that you need to reduce the number of photons in the archive.The probability of such problems is insignificant, especially because soon we are moving to a new, more powerful server, but just in case, keep in mind.
All foty that have been downloaded the old way, with pre-moderation, have not gone away, and I have them in the near future publish.Another important addition: Now in your Personal Cabinet on the site you can edit the data not only for still images, is expected to publish (in fact now there are no such category), but for all your photos on the site . Iethere is no need to ask me to fix something in the geography or other data about the image - all this you can do yourself at any time. But you can only delete the photos within an hour after you download them (for example, once you have downloaded the double).
As always, forward comments / reviews in this thread or a friendly forums.

12.01.2013 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why not Adhemarius ypsilon (Rothschild & Jordan, 1903), like this one more :)

12.01.2013 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quite probable this is Adhemarius gannascus (Stoll, [1790]). Can be moved to "uncertain".

12.01.2013 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right, move this to Adhemarius roessleri (Eitschberger, 2002) "uncertain" so far.

12.01.2013 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Basil, I Xylophanes tersa sent, there hung an extra point and in this he did not leave.

12.01.2013 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm not against.
A copper-butterfly lay like as normal (Admin is empty now) :)

12.01.2013 15:30, Peter Khramov:

Lord, as you see, you do not have the opportunity for themselves to carry foty fine / imprecisely defined? Ienot all users, namely Modera or "trusted" from the official theme?This can be repaired so that you do not need to unsubscribe each time comments (as I write now), they say, the kind of moved, and such comments would generate machine (much like today when confirming loyalty to definitions) and only if necessary, you could him to add text comments. What do you think?
ZYBasil, a copper-butterfly understand, understand.

12.01.2013 15:26, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

12.01.2013 14:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Micronia aculeata.

12.01.2013 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Che did not go out on the copper-butterfly Vitaly Gumenyuk. Several times already drove, and they place (in admin panel) back.

12.01.2013 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Loepa%20cynopsis.htm :) Seems like one...........

12.01.2013 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Poshamanil with the admin (linked and something added). Another would be to teach people correctly write Latin names ....

12.01.2013 1:13, Peter Khramov:

Right now it is already there is not present. Perhaps I have already submitted when foty published today. By the way, a couple of species there is still left hanging if someone can - pliz add to the catalog.

12.01.2013 0:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.01.2013 0:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.01.2013 0:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.01.2013 0:47, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

12.01.2013 0:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.01.2013 0:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.01.2013 0:42, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved. Where you only dug that out...

11.01.2013 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok, added. Can be moved.

11.01.2013 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved, pic added.

11.01.2013 23:01, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, now moderators may add species as usual.

11.01.2013 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, from the admin picture # 17227 xylopanes tersa should be sent to the http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/66826 (Xylophanes tersa). I'm having some reason.

11.01.2013 21:23, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2013 21:23, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2013 21:23, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2013 21:23, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2013 21:22, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2013 20:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'd add if knew how to.

11.01.2013 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Minois dryas.

11.01.2013 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Now we've got even more synonyms and combinations: they have totaled 120,000 (or one hundred twenty thousand), and 60,000 (or sixty thousand) species have at least one synonym catalogued. So it's easier to get the species you need...

11.01.2013 12:30, Peter Khramov:

To edusa.

11.01.2013 12:30, Peter Khramov:

To edusa then.

11.01.2013 12:30, Peter Khramov:

Goes to edusa.

11.01.2013 12:30, Peter Khramov:

To edusa.

11.01.2013 12:28, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

11.01.2013 11:51, Andrey Ponomarev:

Sure, I think. Personally I'd also add such mark as "mine".

11.01.2013 3:44, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Right.

11.01.2013 3:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

edusa.

11.01.2013 3:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

edusa.

11.01.2013 3:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

edusa.

11.01.2013 3:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

edusa.

10.01.2013 22:50, Peter Khramov:

Whose's this shoe?

10.01.2013 19:00, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

10.01.2013 16:16, Sergei Kotov:

In Kirov region it's Timandra comae no doubt.

10.01.2013 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Recently there were quite a lot of photos, which now marked as "larva" whilst they rather present traces of life like leaf-miners tracks in leaves or some nest of whatsoever else. So what's your thoughts, do we need to put in such special mark in "Stage/gender"? Or rename the very "Stage/gender" feature, or just leave it as "larva"?

09.01.2013 20:53, Lev Bely:


The world's leading research and education museum, Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago (US) lately announced serious budget cuts to research and curation support.
According to Dr. Rob Wiedenmann, President of the Entomological Society of America (ESA), the cuts targeting research and curation will have profoundly negative impacts on the museum’s collection of 25 million specimens, and on the valuable research that is done by the scientists who study them.
“Priceless and irreplaceable specimens lose their value unless the specimens are cared for and properly catalogued by a professional curatorial staff, and unless those collections are made available for use by the world's scientific community,” Dr. Wiedenmann wrote in a letter to the museum’s president and board of directors.
“Many of the Field's 25 million specimens are truly irreplaceable,” he continued, “and information stored in those specimens awaits researchers to decode their secrets in order to help address scientific, technological, and conservation issues faced worldwide.”
While acknowledging that the museum faces financial hardships and that action must be taken to ensure its survival, Dr. Wiedenmann offered to provide help from members of ESA, which once faced a similar situation.
“The Entomological Society of America faced such a financial crisis a dozen years ago, which threatened our existence as a professional society,” he wrote. “Through financial and societal restructuring, challenging time-held views and making difficult decisions, we emerged financially robust and vital. I am willing to identify leaders in our field who have a deep knowledge of museums, collections and specimen-based research, individuals who could serve an advisory role to the board and senior staff as you explore how best to restructure to maintain the Field Museum's world-renowned status.”
Dr. Wiedenmann closed by encouraging the museum to remember its goals and core principles as it faces financial hardship.
“From our own experience, I offer you hope — that it is possible to make tough decisions while not undermining the museum's strengths and uniqueness,” he wrote. “I hope you will consider my offer to provide volunteer scientific expertise to aid the restructuring decisions.”
The Entomological Society of America is the largest organization serving the professional and scientific needs of entomologists and people in related disciplines in the world. Founded in 1889, ESA today has more than 6,000 members affiliated with educational institutions, health agencies, private industry, and government. Members are students, researchers, teachers, extension service personnel, administrators, marketing representatives, consultants, and hobbyists. More information on http://www.entsoc.org.
The Entomological Society of America, http://www.entsoc.org
Photo: Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, http://fieldmuseum.org
FMNH collection manager Jim Boone reveals the 50-thousand Herman Strecker Butterfly and Moth Collection, now stored at the museum

08.01.2013 22:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 22:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 22:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 22:27, Peter Khramov:

Any versions more?

08.01.2013 21:22, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 21:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Didn't they get lost... Changed...

08.01.2013 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Wrong date changed to the right one.

08.01.2013 21:11, Peter Khramov:

Date changed.

08.01.2013 21:10, Peter Khramov:

Date changed.

08.01.2013 21:07, Peter Khramov:

Date added.

08.01.2013 21:06, Peter Khramov:

Date changed.

08.01.2013 21:05, Peter Khramov:

Date updated.

08.01.2013 21:05, Peter Khramov:

Date corrected.

08.01.2013 21:03, Peter Khramov:

The date changed.

08.01.2013 21:02, Peter Khramov:

The date changed.

08.01.2013 21:01, Peter Khramov:

Date corrected.

08.01.2013 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Date updated.

08.01.2013 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Date corrected.

08.01.2013 20:59, Peter Khramov:

Date corrected.

08.01.2013 20:59, Peter Khramov:

Date updated.

08.01.2013 20:58, Peter Khramov:

Date updated.

08.01.2013 20:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 20:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 20:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 20:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 20:57, Peter Khramov:

Barely two years passed as this has been already moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 20:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 20:54, Peter Khramov:

So this at last goes to "identified successfully" :--)

08.01.2013 20:54, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, wha?

08.01.2013 20:54, Peter Khramov:

Added the location.

08.01.2013 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 20:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved to sylvestris.

08.01.2013 20:47, Peter Khramov:

Mean, Pyrgus melotis? Or not? The author is from Novorossiysk.

08.01.2013 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" and "Open case". Any opinions welcome.

08.01.2013 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" and "Open case". Share your opinions if you have some.

08.01.2013 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" and "Open case". Please all, share your thoughts.

08.01.2013 18:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to variata.

08.01.2013 18:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

08.01.2013 18:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.01.2013 18:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.01.2013 18:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

08.01.2013 18:26, Peter Khramov:

Q to the author: Evgeny, was there thyme in fact?

08.01.2013 18:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 18:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 18:22, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:22, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:22, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:22, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:22, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified successfully.

08.01.2013 18:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to levana "identified successfully".

08.01.2013 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Added the location/date info.

08.01.2013 10:31, Sergey Talanov:

Alexandr! Great thanks for the ID!

08.01.2013 10:30, Sergey Talanov:

Sergey! Many thanks for the ID!

08.01.2013 2:10, Lev Bely:

Raiders go forward.

07.01.2013 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Grouped with another photo of the specimen and moved just as #14523.

07.01.2013 17:04, Peter Khramov:

What's with that check?

07.01.2013 16:51, Peter Khramov:

Besides, Russian common names added recently might be absent too. Fixed.

07.01.2013 15:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved to lonicerae "uncertain".

07.01.2013 15:50, Peter Khramov:

By the way, this might be enabled already. So if any of you has some free time, please mark the photos of one specimen as related.

07.01.2013 14:10, Peter Khramov:

Russian regions selection was also buggy. Now fixed.

07.01.2013 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.01.2013 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved...

07.01.2013 12:59, Peter Khramov:

Right, changed )

07.01.2013 2:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

That was Yuri Semejkin who identified this right assisted with A. Y. Matov. :)

07.01.2013 0:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Right, this is Lampronia capitella.

07.01.2013 0:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Right, this is Lampronia capitella.

07.01.2013 0:23, Peter Khramov:

Earlier this subsection was almost empty now gradually filled, so do not forget to look. lepidoptera.ru/community/open.

07.01.2013 0:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

07.01.2013 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Andrej, what do you think?

07.01.2013 0:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.01.2013 0:12, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.01.2013 0:12, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.01.2013 0:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved to antiopa "uncertain".

07.01.2013 0:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.01.2013 0:08, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.01.2013 0:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.01.2013 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Guys, any conclusion?

07.01.2013 0:02, Peter Khramov:

Guys, can anybody approve/deny?

07.01.2013 0:00, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

06.01.2013 23:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as the neighbour photos.

06.01.2013 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.01.2013 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.01.2013 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

06.01.2013 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Might be Polyommatus icarus female and another species as well. Can't say anything on the species, few possible. Though icarus is a rather good choice. :)

06.01.2013 16:20, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Why not Polyommatus icarus female? http://www.butterflies-moths-turkey.com/polyommatus-icarus-cokgozlu-mavi,193.html.

06.01.2013 16:05, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

06.01.2013 16:01, Sergei Kotov:

Eurois occulta.

06.01.2013 16:01, Sergei Kotov:

Eurois occulta.

06.01.2013 16:01, Sergei Kotov:

Eurois occulta.

06.01.2013 10:46, Peter Khramov:

Right, moved.

06.01.2013 2:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Honeysuckle is Lonicera maackii, and the larva is still not identified.

06.01.2013 2:32, Yuri Semejkin:

Should be changed to Pieris melete?

06.01.2013 1:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Thanks!

06.01.2013 1:21, Lev Bely:

Bastilla sp.?

06.01.2013 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not synonym but another pair of genus and species, so should be moved. :)

06.01.2013 1:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alas.

06.01.2013 0:43, Peter Khramov:

Anybody say anything more about this photo?

06.01.2013 0:42, Peter Khramov:

Added the date/location.

06.01.2013 0:42, Peter Khramov:

Location/date added.

06.01.2013 0:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.01.2013 0:40, Peter Khramov:

The photographer keeps silent...

06.01.2013 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Halloo...

06.01.2013 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Thoughts were absent...

06.01.2013 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Didn't get clearer...

06.01.2013 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, got the upperside?

06.01.2013 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.01.2013 0:27, Peter Khramov:

Wha?

06.01.2013 0:26, Peter Khramov:

So is this synonym or not, guys?

06.01.2013 0:06, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

06.01.2013 0:06, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

06.01.2013 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.01.2013 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Location changed.

06.01.2013 0:04, Peter Khramov:

To similis "uncertain".

06.01.2013 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Needs to add the species...

06.01.2013 0:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. helferi "uncertain".

06.01.2013 0:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved from nupta to adultera "uncertain".

06.01.2013 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved from argyrognomon to icarus.

05.01.2013 23:59, Peter Khramov:

Roman, what do you think?

05.01.2013 23:58, Peter Khramov:

So if no versions, moved to D. synopla "uncertain".

05.01.2013 23:57, Peter Khramov:

The species needs to be added. We've got no such even after the last big update with plenty of exotic species )

05.01.2013 23:55, Peter Khramov:

Since no more versions, moved to Synanthedon formicaeformis "uncertain".

05.01.2013 23:52, Peter Khramov:

Species needs to be added.

05.01.2013 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 23:50, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, what's about size?

05.01.2013 23:50, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Needs to add the species...

05.01.2013 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Does anybody object?

05.01.2013 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. ariadne "uncertain".

05.01.2013 23:45, Peter Khramov:

Added the location. Alexandr, can you add anything on the species?

05.01.2013 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

05.01.2013 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain".

05.01.2013 23:41, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, Yury's having some internet troubles at the moment, he promised to answer once it would get well...

05.01.2013 23:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 23:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 23:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/17113.

05.01.2013 23:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/17113.

05.01.2013 23:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/17113.

05.01.2013 23:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 23:37, Peter Khramov:

Bleh... Moved...

05.01.2013 23:36, Peter Khramov:

And this is bad too...

05.01.2013 23:36, Peter Khramov:

That's bad...

05.01.2013 23:34, Peter Khramov:

Why they're all so ragged, poor things...

05.01.2013 23:34, Peter Khramov:

Changes added.

05.01.2013 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Again moved.

05.01.2013 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Pity...

05.01.2013 23:31, Peter Khramov:

All data added.

05.01.2013 23:30, Peter Khramov:

The photo goes from "undetermined" to C. vaccinii.

05.01.2013 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, is it this?

05.01.2013 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, is it A. zoegana? Or not?

05.01.2013 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, can you add anything more considering the location/date?

05.01.2013 23:26, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, what do you think? Comae or not?

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date data.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date data.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date info.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date data.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date info.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date info.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date info.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date info.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date info.

05.01.2013 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Added the location and date info.

05.01.2013 23:24, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to B. ino.

05.01.2013 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 23:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

05.01.2013 23:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Done.

05.01.2013 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 23:17, Peter Khramov:

What's N. Am?

05.01.2013 22:42, Lev Bely:

Jacob Morris has been properly playing cello since four, and not long ago he finally released the debut LP “Moths”, which was recorded in the very “Music City” Nashville, where they traditionally serve good stuff. Country music is of special meaning there, so Morris' moths got to be first-rate. Although the “Wet Cigarette” starts with surprising “You've got Australian lips”, the album is surely worth listening to in full, and can be streamed on the Paste Magazine website http://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/av/2012/12/album-stream-jacob-morris---moss.html.
Whilst American NYC band Bishop Allen officially plays true indie rock and has in its past Harvard University attended by some of the band members, they still seem to be tending to the same Nashville and country: on their second album “Bishop Allen and the Broken String” released in 2007, besides oboe and sax you can also hear banjo and trendy “not-just-a-small-guitar” ukulele, which is played in the “Butterfly Nets”.
Jacob Morris, Wet Cigarette (Moths, 2012)

Bishop Allen, Butterfly Nets ( Bishop Allen and the Broken String, 2007)

05.01.2013 17:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can't say if it looks exactly like Nedra ramosula, but the latter is from N. Am, so not sure. Will spot somewhere another pic of this.

05.01.2013 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 14:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Spilosoma punctarium, identified at Botanical Garden Institute FEB RAS.

05.01.2013 14:15, Yuri Semejkin:

Spilosoma punctarium, identified at Botanical Garden Institute FEB RAS.

05.01.2013 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 13:54, Peter Khramov:

The photo moved, species picturized.

05.01.2013 13:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. praeformata.

05.01.2013 13:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 13:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 13:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Done.

05.01.2013 13:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 13:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 13:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.01.2013 13:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 13:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.01.2013 13:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

05.01.2013 13:38, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, then what?) Or not to be identified?

05.01.2013 13:38, Peter Khramov:

The same (marked as related). As for the species, any opinions more?

05.01.2013 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Why, Synev mentions P. heparana in Primorye...

05.01.2013 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain" so far. Dmitry, please check the underside and approve or not.

05.01.2013 13:35, Peter Khramov:

After update there were some troubles with search autosuggestions as to species (except other taxa), which were not autosuggested whilst they're actually in the database. Now fixed.

05.01.2013 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

04.01.2013 21:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

No.

04.01.2013 21:25, Lev Bely:

Some Cucullia?

04.01.2013 21:14, Lev Bely:

Belenois java?

04.01.2013 21:01, Lev Bely:

Underside if possible, till then Symbrenthia hypselis.

04.01.2013 18:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ideopsis gaura (Horsfield, [1829])

04.01.2013 15:24, Lev Bely:

Melitaea britomartis?

04.01.2013 14:56, Lev Bely: This species is identified correctly.

04.01.2013 14:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is Pandemis heparana in Primorye, though in Europe they look bit lighter than this one on the photo.

04.01.2013 14:49, Lev Bely:

Euploea phaenareta?

04.01.2013 14:38, Lev Bely:

Is this the same butterfly that's http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14522? Euploea mulciber?

04.01.2013 13:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr, thanks! If I got it right, P. heparana (most probable) is absent in Vladivostok. So is it in any way worthful to shoot tortrix moths? In the already past year I chanced to talk over with some entomologist, so he said that was nearly of no hope...

04.01.2013 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Lots of website species database glitches and bugs are fixed, and a large number of new species, subspecies and supraspecific taxa plus synonyms added. Now we've got over 76,000 lepidoptera species, more than 30,000 subspecies and over 11,000 supraspecific taxa on the website. This update took long to be finished, with what I've been completely taken for the last 10 days, so didn't post new photos added by users nor responded all the Community comments. Shortly I'll pay all these "debts" off, and once it's done there will be few more serious updates of synonyms, common names, host plants and even later the expansion data renewal.
With such numbers this new huge database might somehow be glitching, so if you happen to experience any difficulties, please don't hesitate to report. Besides, these loads of data may cause website slow-down, which is sure to be fixed not now though.

03.01.2013 22:00, Lev Bely:

Eupanacra poulardi?

03.01.2013 21:10, Lev Bely:

Cechenena helops.

03.01.2013 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Will surely move, right after the big update of the taxa database. Near to come.

03.01.2013 19:01, Sergei Kotov:

Move it or not?

03.01.2013 19:01, Sergei Kotov:

So we move it or not?

03.01.2013 19:01, Sergei Kotov:

We move it or not?

03.01.2013 19:01, Sergei Kotov:

So we move it or not?

03.01.2013 19:01, Sergei Kotov:

So we move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:58, Sergei Kotov:

We move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:58, Sergei Kotov:

Move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:58, Sergei Kotov:

So we move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:58, Sergei Kotov:

So we move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:58, Sergei Kotov:

Move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:56, Sergei Kotov:

So we move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:56, Sergei Kotov:

We move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:55, Sergei Kotov:

So we move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:54, Sergei Kotov:

Move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:54, Sergei Kotov:

We move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:54, Sergei Kotov:

Move it or not?

03.01.2013 18:54, Sergei Kotov:

We move it or not?

03.01.2013 16:00, Lev Bely:

Boloria aquilonaris roddi?

03.01.2013 15:09, Lev Bely:

Hypercompe sp.?

03.01.2013 12:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Naah, local gourmands eat with the eyes :)

03.01.2013 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is some Pandemis, looks not like anything common, most probably heparana, though there is Pandemis ignescana, Kuznetzov, 1976, in Primorye, dark moths, no good quality web images to look closer.

02.01.2013 20:03, Lev Bely:

Yponomeuta evonymella?

02.01.2013 20:03, Lev Bely:

Yponomeuta evonymella?

02.01.2013 20:03, Lev Bely:

Yponomeuta evonymella?

02.01.2013 19:41, Lev Bely:

Yponomeuta evonymella?

31.12.2012 19:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Dear mates! Happy new year to the website team! Wish you new discoveries! Great photos on the website and all the best!

31.12.2012 17:01, Peter Khramov:

Lev, thanks for the wishes and fab video!

30.12.2012 20:51, Lev Bely:

Euploea sylvester?

30.12.2012 20:32, Lev Bely:

Euploea mulciber?

30.12.2012 20:31, Lev Bely:

Euploea core?

30.12.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.12.2012 19:55, Lev Bely:

Phaloesia sp.?

30.12.2012 18:22, Peter Khramov:

Will move this after the species database update.

30.12.2012 14:45, Alex Dumchus:

Lexias pardalis.

30.12.2012 14:22, Peter Khramov:

The vote is completed, the interface Communities will still be refined.

29.12.2012 23:17, Lev Bely:

The last post of the year is all warm wishes for Lepidoptera.ru friends, of perpetual great butterfly hunt, always descriptive and accurate labels, correct IDs, of patience and never-ending interest in either winged creature that has scales, and even of new entomological shop, who knows! And mothanks to everyone for your significant contribution to this website, amazing photography, vivid discussions, sincere support, help and appreciation. Have a happy and cheerful New Year!
As for the New Year's eve video, let it be “Butterfly” of the St. Petersburg mime theatre “Licedeyi” (“Mummers”), which everyone should watch at least once. And once more in the coming year:)
The “Licedeyi” mime theatre, “Butterfly”

29.12.2012 10:05, Viktor Kolesnikov:

To Alexandr. ...so they're identified by taste! :)

28.12.2012 23:11, Lev Bely:



In the Congo, where mammals and birds are nearly extinguished by hunters, somewhere deep in the rain forests everything is full of life, which is all buzzing, crunching and peeping, and these sounds truly dominate everyone happened to be there.
The area is rather far away from any political anxiety so keeps out of all the storms, and the local insect biodiversity still remains unknown. A new monographic book recently published in Zootaxa presents actual data on the Congo's insect biodiversity by researchers from the University of Florida and the Royal Museum of Central Africa in Belgium. They tried to cover the situation with insects in this part of Central Africa, where the habitat has been being destroyed more and more every year.
The authors focused on leaf-mining moths, amidst which they named 41 species what's nearly twice as many as previously known there. Leaf-mining moths can be found everywhere in the world and they play an important role in agriculture since some of them are pests, whilst others on the contrary constrain expansion of invasive plants. Some species are even able to slow aging in plants.
“When we began this project, we had no idea how many species would be out there,” said co-author Akito Kawahara, assistant curator of Lepidoptera at the Florida Museum of Natural History on the UF campus. “In a two-week field trip, we discovered nearly 50 potentially new species, which is really surprising. There is still an enormous amount of life out there that we know very little of.”
Jurate DePrins, the lead author of the study, has been working on leaf miners for almost 10 years and about 5 years ago he started working with Kawahara. As the name suggests, the small moths burrow within leaves as larvae, making them particularly difficult to find. Adult moths measure only about 2 to 5 millimeters in length, but they can be extraordinarily beautiful with colorful markings and metallic scales, Kawahara said.
“The caterpillars are completely flat so they can live inside the thin leaf,” Kawahara said. “If you think of a regular caterpillar and then you squished it and shrunk it, that’s what they look like.”
After the larvae gathered, researchers raise them to adult stage right on the spot in the course of their expedition. It takes just a week for some species.
“It’s so hard to tell what’s actually happening because they’re so small and they get overlooked, but if you look at what is happening inside a leaf under a microscope, it’s just an incredible world,” Kawahara said. “You’ll see a tiny wasp larva living within a caterpillar, and another, even smaller wasp larva living inside that larger wasp larva that is inside the moth larva. It really opens your eyes to this incredible, unknown world and makes you think, ‘What is going on here?’ It’s truly amazing.”
Leaf-mining moths have unusual survival strategies, poorly understood by researchers, Kawahara said. Relatives of the new species are known to make “green islands,” patches of green leaves found in a pile of brown leaves. When leaves fall from trees and turn brown, the caterpillars preserve the leaves they live in and keep them green.
“Some of these caterpillars actually have the ability to control plant tissue and prevent aging in the plant,” Kawahara said. “Now we’re trying to actually understand the mechanism behind how they actually do it.”
The subfamily Lithocolletinae explored in the study is one of the oldest-known Lepidoptera subfamilies, first described by Carl Linnaeus in 1758. The only book that covers the subfamily species in Africa was published in 1961.
“This is really one of the first major revisions on species level of any of the African members of this large family,” said Donald Davis, a research entomologist at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. “Any of their discoveries is going to be important because it greatly increases what we previously knew, how little we knew.”
While many large organisms are being studied, not many researchers focus on the smaller organisms, Davis said. Information about Lithocolletinae is needed to understand which species may be agricultural pests or used to control invasive plants.
“It’s an unknown fauna and so they’ve made a major step to start telling us something about this biota,” Davis said. “Because the moths are herbivores, they have both beneficial and detrimental benefits. It’s one of the things we get a lot of questions about.”
University of Florida, http://news.ufl.edu
Photo: Phyllocnistis labyrinthella leaf mine on a common aspen
The Naked Scientists on leaf-mining moth larvae living inside the leaves of a horse chestnut (with English subtitles)

26.12.2012 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, only there is Mesapamea, secalella or secalis that may be identified just by genitalia. The sure ID needs examination. :)

26.12.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.12.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved to T. cepitis.

26.12.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

26.12.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Moving.

26.12.2012 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

26.12.2012 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

26.12.2012 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.12.2012 23:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.12.2012 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

26.12.2012 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.12.2012 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Why, pity this is not ravida...

26.12.2012 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.12.2012 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

26.12.2012 23:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.12.2012 23:09, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the approval, moved.

26.12.2012 23:08, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

26.12.2012 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Added data, moved the photo.

26.12.2012 23:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. pigra.

26.12.2012 23:05, Peter Khramov:

What's about the neighbour photos http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery?size=sm&sp=7313, if the ID is right?

26.12.2012 23:05, Peter Khramov:

Ok.

26.12.2012 23:03, Peter Khramov:

Bleh...

26.12.2012 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Among four species of this genus which are in Russian Far East, this appeared to be Callopistria juventina.

26.12.2012 21:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree with Sergey, overlooked that.

26.12.2012 21:12, Peter Khramov:

Vitaly, please mark relative photos with "photos of this species", you happen to have several photos of a specimen. Would be much easier to identify...

26.12.2012 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

May this still be festucae? Though I wouldn't even try to ID it surely by such photo. The shot sucks nor it's possible to identify. :(

26.12.2012 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, this is not Clostera curtula. Don't you please doubt my ID, these species clearly differ. :)

26.12.2012 19:07, Sergei Kotov:

Triodia sylvina (Linnaeus, 1761).

26.12.2012 19:07, Sergei Kotov:

Epirrita autumnata (Borkhausen, 1794).

26.12.2012 19:06, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 19:06, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 19:06, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 19:05, Sergei Kotov:

Agrotis segetum ([Schiffermuller], 1775).

26.12.2012 19:05, Sergei Kotov:

Agrotis segetum ([Schiffermuller], 1775).

26.12.2012 19:04, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 19:04, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 19:04, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 19:02, Sergei Kotov:

Plusia putnami Grote, 1873.

26.12.2012 19:02, Sergei Kotov:

Plusia putnami Grote, 1873.

26.12.2012 19:01, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 19:01, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 18:57, Sergei Kotov:

Paradiarsia punicea (Hubner, [1803]).

26.12.2012 18:57, Sergei Kotov:

Paradiarsia punicea (Hubner, [1803]).

26.12.2012 18:57, Sergei Kotov:

Paradiarsia punicea (Hubner, [1803]).

26.12.2012 18:55, Sergei Kotov:

Timandra comae A. Schmidt, 1931.

26.12.2012 18:55, Sergei Kotov:

Timandra comae A. Schmidt, 1931.

26.12.2012 18:54, Sergei Kotov:

Sedina buettneri.

26.12.2012 18:52, Sergei Kotov:

Aplocera praeformata (Hubner, 1826).

26.12.2012 18:52, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 18:51, Sergei Kotov:

Epirrita autumnata (Borkhausen, 1794).

26.12.2012 18:50, Sergei Kotov:

Mythimna ferrago (Fabricius, 1787).

26.12.2012 18:46, Sergei Kotov:

Lacanobia suasa (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

26.12.2012 18:46, Sergei Kotov:

Sorry, mistakenly commented the wrong photo. This is actually Cucullia lucifuga (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

26.12.2012 18:42, Sergei Kotov:

Lacanobia suasa (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

26.12.2012 18:41, Sergei Kotov:

Tholera cespitis (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

26.12.2012 18:41, Sergei Kotov:

Ptilophora plumigera (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

26.12.2012 18:40, Sergei Kotov:

Hydraecia ultima Holst, 1965.

26.12.2012 18:39, Sergei Kotov:

Capsula sparganii (Esper, 1790).

26.12.2012 18:38, Sergei Kotov:

Capsula sparganii (Esper, 1790).

26.12.2012 18:35, Sergei Kotov:

Brenthis ino (Rottemburg, 1775).

26.12.2012 18:35, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.12.2012 18:34, Sergei Kotov:

Apamea monoglypha (Hufnagel, 1766).

26.12.2012 18:33, Sergei Kotov:

Helotropha leucostigma (Hubner, 1808).

26.12.2012 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Double deleted.

26.12.2012 14:45, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Petr, please delete this. Double!

26.12.2012 9:44, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on September 15th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:44, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on August 10th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:43, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on August 18th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:43, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on August 18th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:42, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on October 15th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:41, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on July 20th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:40, Sergey Talanov:

Identified as Clostera curtula (Linnaeus, 1758).

26.12.2012 9:39, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on August 25th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:38, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on July 10th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:38, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on July 20th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:37, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on July 20th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:37, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on September 20th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:36, Sergey Talanov:

Identified as Pheosia tremula (Clerck).

26.12.2012 9:35, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on July 18th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:27, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on July 18th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:25, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on August 20th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:23, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on August 20th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:22, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on July 18th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:21, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on September 26th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:20, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on September 25th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:19, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on August 25th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:18, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on September 25th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:17, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on August 20th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:16, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on July 25th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:15, Sergey Talanov:

Shot on September 20th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 9:14, Sergey Talanov:

Probably, Tholera decimalis (Poda, 1761). Shot on August 10th 2012, Kirov region south-west.

26.12.2012 5:35, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Likely to be!

25.12.2012 23:59, Lev Bely:

Brenthis ino?

25.12.2012 23:55, Lev Bely:

Brenthis ino?

25.12.2012 23:45, Lev Bely:

Adhemarius roessleri?

25.12.2012 23:40, Lev Bely:

Adhemarius gannascus?

25.12.2012 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

25.12.2012 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can be Timandra comae, though need to know where it's from since there are three species very similar.

25.12.2012 15:14, Sergey Talanov:

May it be Simyra albovenosa (Goeze, 1781)?

24.12.2012 23:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.12.2012 23:59, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

24.12.2012 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

24.12.2012 23:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Mythimna unipuncta but long flown Mythimna conigera. :)

24.12.2012 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Clostera pigra.

24.12.2012 22:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Oligia strigilis.

24.12.2012 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nola aerugula.

24.12.2012 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nola aerugula.

24.12.2012 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nola aerugula.

24.12.2012 22:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Got it, will be more reserved. :)

24.12.2012 22:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not Mythimna pallens but Mythimna pudorina again, they're so different.

24.12.2012 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mythimna pudorina.

24.12.2012 22:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ragged Mythimna pudorina.

24.12.2012 22:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

To "uncertain".

24.12.2012 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, you've got furious) The guy will come and add the location and date if it's of such need. Unlike biologists, photographers don't always take it as self-evident this info is necessary, we talked it over already...

24.12.2012 22:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

To "uncertain", these "genitalia" species can't be surely ID'ed without examination.

24.12.2012 22:05, Lev Bely:


Some lepidoptera species get nutrition in a very intricate manner, they fish tears out of the sleeping birds' eyes using harpoon-like proboscis with special barbs at its tip. Back in 2006 scientists discovered those moths feeding on birds in Madagascar.
Roland Hilgartner from the German Primate Centre in Göttingen, Germany, and Mamisolo Raoilison from the University of Antananarivo in Madagascar were the first who spotted this curious sight in the island state's Kirindy forest.
Tear-lover moths and butterflies can be as well met in Africa, Asia and South America, where they usually land on large, peaceful animals such as deers, antelopes or crocodiles, which don't knock them off right away. No such big animals in Madagascar where the main mammals are agile lemurs and mongooses, which immediately fling moths off, and birds just fly away after being disturbed.
Not while they're sleeping though. Madagascan moths were spotted sitting on the necks of sleeping magpie robins and Newtonia birds, from where moth could reach the bird's eye. The moth plunged proboscis under the bird's eyelid and sucked out the tear fluid. Interesting that the thing happened in the wet season when the soils lacked sodium, what might have been the reason of such moth behaviour, supposed the scientists.

However this food is not easy to get. Sleeping birds hold their eyelids tightly closed, so the moths' proboscis compared to the one of others drinking tears of large animals is not smooth as a straw but equipped with hooks and “shaped like an ancient harpoon”, Hilgartner says.
Herewith the proboscis is fixed well and doesn't seem to disturb the sleeping bird. There are questions yet to be answered like if moths anaesthetize the eye to reduce the irritation, and if they're all males as well as the other tear-lover moths from elsewhere, for which tears constitute the main share of their nutrition.
New Scientist, http://www.newscientist.com
Photos: (1) moth drinking tears of sleeping bird, (2) moth's proboscis close-up, Roland Hilgartner, Mamisolo Raoilison, http://www.newscientist.com

24.12.2012 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2012 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Deltote pygarga.

24.12.2012 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Deltote pygarga.

24.12.2012 22:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Deltote pygarga, yeah.

24.12.2012 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

@Conistra vaccinii.

24.12.2012 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agapeta hamana Date? location?

24.12.2012 21:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agapeta zoegana Date? location?

24.12.2012 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2012 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2012 21:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeah, not Sideridis rivularis but Callopistria juventina, even another subfamily.

24.12.2012 21:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yeah, not Sideridis rivularis but Callopistria juventina.

24.12.2012 21:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one is worn-out Mythimna too, not Simyra albovenosa.

24.12.2012 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is worn-out Mythimna, not Simyra albovenosa.

24.12.2012 21:03, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

24.12.2012 20:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lichens look really amazing but to ID the moth the date and location needed.

24.12.2012 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tholera decimalis, please add the date and location. :)

24.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.12.2012 20:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia incerta, please name the location!

24.12.2012 20:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Sergey! Where it was shot?

24.12.2012 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.12.2012 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

24.12.2012 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.12.2012 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

24.12.2012 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the correction, moved.

24.12.2012 18:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia incerta.

24.12.2012 18:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia incerta.

24.12.2012 18:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia incerta.

24.12.2012 18:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia incerta.

24.12.2012 18:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia incerta.

24.12.2012 14:28, Peter Khramov:

See my comment there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/16734.

24.12.2012 14:27, Peter Khramov:

If you are the author of photos, but now the picture on the page you have access to the data of the original file name and the title of the form (original - in which you loaded the photo on the site). This information is displayed for the author of the picture, other users can not see it.

24.12.2012 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Vitaly, no problem. Just made it that photos are now added with the original filename (that one the photographer used on upload) and original name of the species. These data are seen to no one but the author of the photo, other users neither can see this.
To all: if you have any wishes as for the website use, please don't hesitate to ask. Many things may be added.

24.12.2012 12:27, Lev Bely:

Vitaly, obviously shouldn't, they make photos look much more interesting. Just I supposed that the beetle wanted to get its five minutes of fame, so did he posed alongside Agrotis. Finally he got them:)

24.12.2012 10:44, Vitaly Gumenuk:

The original name used on upload should be saved or I get it named and ID'ed wrongly what's bad.
Many websites keep all the renames.

24.12.2012 10:37, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Would be really to keep the first name saved so I could later revise the photo in my archive if it was ID'ed wrongly. Otherwise how can I now find it in my archive with thousands of photos?

24.12.2012 10:04, Vitaly Gumenuk:

That is some beetle crawling, some Staphylinidae. They happen to fly to the light as well as mosquitoes, sometimes it's hard to avoid their being shot together with moths. Can they be removed later on in Photoshop, not sure if it should be done?

23.12.2012 17:24, Lev Bely:

Bristol band Massive Attack is an England's most prominent electronic music group, the trip hop patriarchs that for already three decades have been staying best musicians in the genre. “Butterfly Caught” from their fourth album 100th Window released in 2003 has the official video rather depressive, however this fan clip where the song serves as the soundtrack to the Kafka based French animated film “Le Processus” by Philippe Grammaticopoulos and Xavier L'Hermuzière, looks even sharper due to its highly disturbing atmosphere.
If there's anything you should know of the Chicago indie band The Sea and Cake, that's what they're former members of The Cocktails, Shrimp Boat and Tortoise. Such animalistic gang must play nothing but a cool music, so is their album The Moonlight Butterfly. Two songs, “Lyric” and “The Moonlight Butterfly” could definitely make any naturalist feel totally happy, especially when added with the sea, cake and those moonlight butterflies. What we sadly have not today, but there's always someday.
Massive Attack, Butterfly Caught (100th Window, 2003)

The Sea and Cake, Lyric and The Moonlight Butterfly (The Moonlight Butterfly, 2011)

23.12.2012 12:15, Igor Karpov:

From Yury to Viktor: Imagine that those Latin names of species I'd use when writing an article for a local newspaper about butterflies. It's just no one will read it. I've been working since 2001 at a regional newspaper plus collaborating with five editorial boards, have publications on websites. Wish all lepidoptera.ru colleagues a Happy New Year!

23.12.2012 8:52, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

21.12.2012 23:03, Lev Bely:

Spoiled Agrotis shoot:)

21.12.2012 22:40, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, it was from the outset - the headline in big letters on the right of the home page community has work - "All comments". But perhaps it is not sufficiently clear ...

21.12.2012 22:35, Evgeny Komarov:

That's right! Though quite alive. Lies not, crawls :)

21.12.2012 20:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! And if you make a reference to the page "All recent comments" for those who want? I think that will be good and will suit all.

21.12.2012 20:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Staphylinidae, I guess.

21.12.2012 19:58, Lev Bely:

Wonder what is there on the right, lies like a dead.

21.12.2012 10:22, Peter Khramov:

Ok, will be female. Berserk males are kept separately from females on there, in another vivarium.

21.12.2012 8:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And female 100% sure.

20.12.2012 22:01, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. sigma.

20.12.2012 21:41, Sergei Kotov:

Eugraphe sigma (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

20.12.2012 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Good for us. The first image of the species.

20.12.2012 19:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, such was the staff ;) 100% sure Rothschildia and 80-90% for the species.

20.12.2012 19:36, Peter Khramov:

The staff of the Butterfly House said it was Attacus. Cram?

20.12.2012 18:43, Evgeny Komarov:

I'd suppose Rothschildia lebeau (Guérin-Méneville, 1868).

20.12.2012 17:11, Peter Khramov:

Guys, anybody say anything?

20.12.2012 14:52, Peter Khramov:

There is a thought that one of the major flaws of the new interface - the absence of an explicit reference to the last few comments (to which they may be - to fotam whether a species or even what). Who that thinks right idea or not?

20.12.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, thanks for the tip, corrected.

20.12.2012 14:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females.

20.12.2012 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to T. matura just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/16753.

20.12.2012 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to T. matura just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/16753.

20.12.2012 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to T. matura just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/16753.

20.12.2012 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.12.2012 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to.

20.12.2012 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/16348.

20.12.2012 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/16348.

20.12.2012 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Fine, moved to E. foenella.

20.12.2012 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Hada plebeja to L. contigua.

20.12.2012 14:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

20.12.2012 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.12.2012 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #16647.

20.12.2012 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.12.2012 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

20.12.2012 14:30, Peter Khramov:

Left "undetermined".

20.12.2012 14:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Zanclognatha lunalis. Sergey, maybe you could add its synonym with reference using the special form for submitting such the info on http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/6917.

20.12.2012 14:27, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

20.12.2012 14:26, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

20.12.2012 14:26, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, corrected.

20.12.2012 14:26, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, updated.

20.12.2012 14:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #16786.

20.12.2012 14:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #16786.

20.12.2012 14:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as photo #16786.

20.12.2012 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.12.2012 12:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

I see that Eulithis prunata is right.

20.12.2012 11:35, Marija Jaunkunga:

Likely to be Eulithis prunata.

19.12.2012 18:59, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Anarta trifolii (Hufnagel, 1766).

19.12.2012 18:59, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Anarta trifolii (Hufnagel, 1766).

19.12.2012 18:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey's right!

19.12.2012 18:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not Hadena, looks very similar to Sideridis reticulata.

19.12.2012 18:53, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Acronicta rumicis (Linnaeus, 1758).

19.12.2012 18:52, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Polypogon lunalis (Scopoli, 1763).

19.12.2012 18:50, Sergei Kotov:

Right, this is Apamea lateritia.

19.12.2012 18:50, Sergei Kotov:

Correct, this is Apamea lateritia.

19.12.2012 18:50, Sergei Kotov:

Yes, this is Apamea lateritia.

19.12.2012 18:49, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

19.12.2012 18:44, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

19.12.2012 18:41, Sergei Kotov:

This is Lacanobia contigua (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

19.12.2012 18:39, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Sideridis reticulatus (Goeze, 1781).

19.12.2012 14:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author is right, Epiblema foenella.

19.12.2012 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author is right, Thalpophila matura.

19.12.2012 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author is correct, this is Thalpophila matura.

18.12.2012 23:45, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

18.12.2012 23:38, Peter Khramov:

Really?

18.12.2012 19:23, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Female, second generation.

18.12.2012 17:30, Peter Khramov:

What a shame... Moved to X. ditrapezium.

18.12.2012 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

18.12.2012 16:08, Sergei Kotov:

Xestia ditrapezium (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

18.12.2012 16:07, Sergei Kotov:

Xestia ditrapezium (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

18.12.2012 13:41, Peter Khramov:

Yury, if you've got those done, that's ok.

18.12.2012 13:40, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

18.12.2012 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

18.12.2012 5:44, Evgeny Komarov:

On page sort Lygephila (http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/1294) twice a view Lygephila craccae (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775), although the page from him, like one (http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6842) .

18.12.2012 0:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Earias clorana.

17.12.2012 14:39, Andrey Ponomarev:

Don't know what happened, might have missed it. Petr, this is Sciota hostilis, to move.

17.12.2012 14:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Karpov.

17.12.2012 11:19, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, which Yury did you really address, Semejkin (the author of the photo) or Karpov (the author of the comments on Neptis)? :--)

17.12.2012 7:38, Yuri Semejkin:

Dmitry! I'm not biologist, just amateur photographer, I shoot whatever alive. I'm either curious about what is there beside the camera, though can't ID everything I see. As for guides, I use Kurentsov's one and also get some info in the web. When possible, I ask pros if they're not in fields or busy with reports, and every thing identified by them is always provided with reference and job position.

17.12.2012 2:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! I've got it done before. Tried also to add this one with the larva photo number, but got message that both photos had been already got grouped. Why for anyway need to add numbers when it's already seen as "another photo of the same specimen".

17.12.2012 0:45, Peter Khramov:

Location added.

16.12.2012 22:04, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Sorry, missed the location, this is East Kazakhstan, Western Altai, Ust-Kamenogorsk.

16.12.2012 21:13, Peter Khramov:

As judged by the author, this is neither Eastern Europe nor Europe at all (as I see, his previous photos are made in Kazakhstan).

16.12.2012 21:11, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

16.12.2012 21:11, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

16.12.2012 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.12.2012 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.12.2012 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.12.2012 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.12.2012 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Where is this butterfly from? If Eastern Europe, then this is Pontia daplidice. Location is quite important to note. :)

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Right, goes to X. icteritia.

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to X. icteritia.

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to X. icteritia.

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to X. icteritia.

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to X. icteritia.

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to X. icteritia.

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to M. persicariae.

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to M. persicariae.

16.12.2012 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to M. persicariae.

16.12.2012 20:38, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to M. persicariae.

16.12.2012 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.12.2012 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.12.2012 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.12.2012 19:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author's ID is right.

16.12.2012 19:43, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2012 19:42, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2012 19:41, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2012 19:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Cucullia verbasci but Cucullia asteris.

16.12.2012 19:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Cucullia verbasci but Cucullia asteris.

16.12.2012 19:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Cucullia verbasci but Cucullia asteris.

16.12.2012 19:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey is right!

16.12.2012 18:43, Lev Bely:

Ova of the butterfly http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14762, supposedly Zygaena osterodensis.

16.12.2012 16:59, Roman Ishin:

Melanchra persicariae (Linnaeus, 1761).

16.12.2012 15:57, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

16.12.2012 15:53, Sergei Kotov:

The species identified incorrectly! This is actually Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761).

16.12.2012 15:52, Sergei Kotov:

No, this is Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761).

16.12.2012 15:51, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana dia (Linnaeus, 1767).

16.12.2012 15:45, Sergei Kotov:

Melitaea phoebe (Goeze, [1779]).

16.12.2012 15:43, Sergei Kotov:

Pontia edusa (Fabricius, 1777).

16.12.2012 10:04, Peter Khramov:

To "undetermined".

16.12.2012 10:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.12.2012 10:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.12.2012 10:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.12.2012 10:00, Peter Khramov:

Imitator moved )

16.12.2012 9:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.12.2012 9:59, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.12.2012 9:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

16.12.2012 9:58, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

15.12.2012 22:42, Lev Bely:

“Baby, it's cold outside” should butterflies be murmuring to each other whilst dreaming deep beneath the snow and waiting for spring. Which is fairly hard to disagree these days when it's about minus 20 Celsius outside. However the winter has a special charm too, and we'd better warm ourselves with some genuine American soul that will be keeping our spirits high until butterflies get awake.
For one, with Gregg Diamond's “Hot Butterfly” released in 1978 with Diamond's band “Bionic Boogie” and Luther Vandross' vocal. The song was later covered by Yvette Marie Stevens, or simply Chaka Khan. Both versions are great though Vandross' performing is an absolute hit.
Gregg Diamond & Bionic Boogie feat. Luther Vandross, Hot Butterfly (1978)

Chaka Khan, Papillon aka Hot Butterfly (1980)

15.12.2012 17:28, Viktor Kolesnikov:

To Yury: thanks for the support. :) I've already thought I'm kind of unique. Even I tried to explain that I wasn't against of Latin, but for using of both Latin and Russian common names in Russia, which we can see in many scientific works. No complaints to the website and moderators, I see this is still being developed and improved, and common names are as well used and added. Good luck then! Waiting for spring!

15.12.2012 13:36, Peter Khramov:

On the main page, the community was a glitch with the display recent comments to the species. Fixed.

15.12.2012 9:53, Yuriy Karpov:

Viktor. I believe too that common names need to be added. Most butterflies and moths of Russia (and of the USSR) have common names which also mentioned in popsci literature and used as well amidst the non-pros. As for localities and local common names of species, not an issue for anybody and never was. There are local common names of elk or bear, yet we always know which we talk about. As this website is to a large audience, it could be added with as many common names as possible. Then again, all Erebia butterflies in Siberia for instance have Russian synonyms, which are largely used in scientific circles such as Irkutsk State Agricultural Academy, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk State Pedagogical University. Neither I'm a pro, just an amateur naturalist, though I observe nature and keep communicating with pros of all levels.
Dmitry, your comparison of Aporia crataegi with Aporia hippia isn't actually correct since there are both in Russian Far East and locals (non-pros) know the difference; though colors of these butterflies hardly differ, their behaviours are distinctive.

15.12.2012 0:18, Peter Khramov:

With the withdrawal (but not lock) the results of the survey was another glitch is now corrected.

14.12.2012 1:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one to move too along with its larva and pupa. :)

14.12.2012 1:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caradrina wullschlegeli.

14.12.2012 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caradrina wullschlegeli.

14.12.2012 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caradrina wullschlegeli.

14.12.2012 1:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.12.2012 1:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ptycholoma imitator.

13.12.2012 23:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "undetermined".

13.12.2012 22:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

The same Caradrina sp.

13.12.2012 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Might be confused with http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/16104? Is C. thalecti on there? Or what?

13.12.2012 20:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

You seem to be wrong, this is Caradrina.

13.12.2012 8:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Need to see this alive.

12.12.2012 21:54, Peter Khramov:

Now in the Community shows not just the last tape of comments, and the comments are divided into subsections:
My Subscriptions - comments to the topics fotam and species to which you subscribe. And on that you signed? And those writers whom you are or comments which left earlier.Open discussions - unfinished discussions and unanswered questions.
Comments to the photos and comments to the species - similar to the previous interface.
Last entries - also without comment, popular blog - the most popular entries.
All titles are sub-links to the corresponding full sample.Furthermore, such links are duplicated for each comment block. For example, clicking on the "My Subscriptions", you go to a page with all the comments, to which you subscribe.
Thus, the comments for further discussion and comments to your fotam not lost under countless "Photography transferred from inaccurate".In this sample, it was on the front page of the old interface, the Community is now open for the major link "All comments" on the right.
If someone will notice - it became better or did not - unsubscribe in the subject.
ZY Screw golosovonie (see. The right block).

12.12.2012 14:13, Andrey Ponomarev:

Something tells me this is not Assara terebrella? Better to move to "undetermined".

12.12.2012 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, any conclusions?

12.12.2012 2:34, Peter Khramov:

Maria, have you any shots of its upperside?

12.12.2012 0:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

This family can't be identified by underside photos. :(

12.12.2012 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Any versions on the moth?

11.12.2012 23:56, Lev Bely:

Brenthis daphne?

11.12.2012 23:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)

11.12.2012 23:06, Lev Bely:

Zygaena osterodensis?

11.12.2012 23:05, Lev Bely:

Imitator of Acleris:)

11.12.2012 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ptycholoma imitator.

11.12.2012 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ptycholoma imitator.

11.12.2012 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ptycholoma imitator.

11.12.2012 22:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not Acleris.

11.12.2012 22:25, Lev Bely:

Acleris sp.?

11.12.2012 20:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

I reckon the species is ID'ed wrongly, genus is right but the species is either pyramidea or berbera. Though the poor moth condition makes ID impossible.

11.12.2012 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.12.2012 19:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Amphipyra perflua.

11.12.2012 11:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

11.12.2012 11:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.12.2012 11:56, Peter Khramov:

Goes to M. didyma.

11.12.2012 11:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.12.2012 2:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Male.

11.12.2012 2:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus.

10.12.2012 21:02, Lev Bely:

Gillmeria pallidactyla?

10.12.2012 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Will move after the species database gets updated.

10.12.2012 16:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Female.

10.12.2012 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Starting next major update database taxa. To avoid further confusion, as in past times, temporarily disables the loading of new species and other taxa of the section classification.

10.12.2012 16:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Melitaea didyma.

10.12.2012 16:05, Sergei Kotov:

Melitaea didyma (Esper, 1778).

10.12.2012 16:03, Sergei Kotov:

Laothoe populi (Linnaeus, 1758).

10.12.2012 16:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" just as another photo of this specimen.

10.12.2012 16:00, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the hint, gonna fix that bug. P.S. As for the ID, Vlad says genitalia examination needed. Thus, whilst we've got no versions more, move this to "uncertain"...

10.12.2012 15:48, Peter Khramov:

The photo looks good.

10.12.2012 15:47, Peter Khramov:

What a valiant guy.

10.12.2012 15:47, Peter Khramov:

What a background, such a background...

10.12.2012 15:46, Peter Khramov:

Yury, would like to notice that your shots have been gradually getting better and better, more photo-ish. Keep it up :--) Just you'd better join photos of the same specimen using the mark "Other photos of the same specimen", otherwise it's not always clear to see "empty pupa got from the previous larva".

10.12.2012 14:31, Sergey Novitckiy:

I started writing the comment, then internet turned off and after it turned on again I submitted the comment, didn't reload the web page.

10.12.2012 13:05, Peter Khramov:

I'm about the anonymous comment added, not of the ID )

10.12.2012 11:42, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Polyommatus icarus? East Kazakhstan, Ust-Kamenogorsk.

10.12.2012 11:25, Sergey Novitckiy:

No faults of yours. I did it wrong. -)

09.12.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Hm. I wonder how it could ever work that way... Ok, will check it for bugs.

09.12.2012 21:53, Sergey Novitckiy:

Me.

09.12.2012 20:07, Peter Khramov:

Guys, who left the comment?

09.12.2012 19:31, Sergey Novitckiy:

This is not Celypha cespitana (cespitana is smaller). Most probably Phiaris umbrosana or Syricoris lacunana.

09.12.2012 0:39, Peter Khramov:

Easy for one, hard for another ;--)

09.12.2012 0:38, Peter Khramov:

Sure, moved.

08.12.2012 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

So it's just as easy to check out the website of Japanese lepidoptera and here we are, Cystidia stratonice.

08.12.2012 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Geometridae larva.

08.12.2012 22:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

So isn't the photo moved to the species?

08.12.2012 21:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Yponomeuta evonymella "uncertain" so far.

08.12.2012 20:06, Lev Bely:

Ariadne ariadne?

08.12.2012 20:02, Lev Bely:

Belenois java?

08.12.2012 19:58, Lev Bely:

Plebejus argus?

08.12.2012 19:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm sorry, not Eumedonia eumedon (as it's named on here).

08.12.2012 19:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely not Aricia eumedon. Also where is this blue from? Please location.

08.12.2012 16:46, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Eumedonia eumedon?

08.12.2012 15:50, Lev Bely:

The King of Rockabilly as Ray Campi is called has been reigning long and capitally, as true king is supposed to do. During the reign he even happened to work as a high-school teacher in California for 25 whole years, and today Campi in his nearly 80 keeps performing, briskly strums his double bass and recalls Elvis with whom he would clap heels back in the day.
“Caterpillar” was recorded in Austin in 1957, and 50 years later in 2007 Ray Campi still rocks the stage in Hemsby, Norfolk (UK), singing it alive as much vigorously. And that's exactly when rock 'n' roll ain't dead and, the more, gets better with age, for 2007 version can make dance even those who're already able to walk though still mispronounce “Ray” as “lay” and take their time to know about Elvis, dance under the moon and jolly 50's.
Ray Campi, Caterpillar (1957)

Ray Campi, Caterpillar (Hemsby, 2007)

08.12.2012 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Adjusted / cleaned. Most likely, you just forgot to change the level of the taxon in the list with the default view right you Rod. It should be me there still pohimichit to it by default, the most appropriate level for each taxon, and not always view.

08.12.2012 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to rivularis.

08.12.2012 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to adippe.

08.12.2012 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, goes to.

08.12.2012 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

08.12.2012 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Ok, move to M. britomartis.

08.12.2012 14:01, Peter Khramov:

Viktor, for now users can't remove photos. As for yours, you just need to upload a new image and comment it or the old one, or e-mail me or comment right here for me to know. Neither users can complete photos with data after uploading, though unlike the first thing I'm about to enable it soon. Till then, comment the photo with data and I'll add them.

08.12.2012 10:14, Viktor Kolesnikov:

So I've got a few questions. 1. Is it possible to upload a new image instead of one previously added (for some reason like if I'm not content with its quality, angle or I've got another one of better quality or of worse quality but the angle may be more helpful in ID)? And how should I proceed, maybe notice that this new photo is a change? 2. Is it possible to complete with some data already uploaded photos, say if I forgot to note the location of where it had been shot/caught?

08.12.2012 8:38, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

08.12.2012 8:23, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

08.12.2012 8:16, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

08.12.2012 8:11, Yuriy Karpov:

Argynnis adippe (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

08.12.2012 8:05, Yuriy Karpov:

Neptis rivularis (Scopoli, 1763).

08.12.2012 7:26, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Looks very close though I read there are several similar species relative to the subgenus Mellicta.

08.12.2012 2:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Phyllodes staudingeri this kind dobovlyaet, tribe Phyllodini in Noctuoidea → superfamily family subfamily Erebidae → Calpinae. Tribe was created, and when he became a sort of drove the species to the genus name with the name of the tribe, a mess. Clean Peter, I'm the kind of a couple of species inserted.

08.12.2012 1:50, Peter Khramov:

Why can not you born? There is also a range of taxa listed, including and b. Although the view - by default. With the wrong taxon - I accomplish your goal, I will correct. And if some exotics with funeta, then you can not do is add in a few days I unloaded (currently in preparation).

08.12.2012 0:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.12.2012 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

08.12.2012 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.12.2012 23:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, for the kind of had to create a tribe and family, but there is some kind of joint. The views are created with the tribe, and race I can not create. Please help me. and what to do when a wrong created taxon?

07.12.2012 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Question closed. Phyllodes staudingeri.

07.12.2012 21:27, Vlad Proklov:

Rather malinella.

07.12.2012 21:26, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

07.12.2012 21:26, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

07.12.2012 21:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Phyllodes imperialis or close to. Hind wings are quite doubtful.

07.12.2012 18:36, Peter Khramov:

Any success?

07.12.2012 18:30, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.12.2012 18:29, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

07.12.2012 15:26, Peter Khramov:

Right, updated.

07.12.2012 13:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yponomeuta evonymellus (Linnaeus, 1758) ???

07.12.2012 13:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yponomeuta evonymellus (Linnaeus, 1758) ???

07.12.2012 13:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yponomeuta evonymellus (Linnaeus, 1758) ???

07.12.2012 13:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why this is still in "undetermined".

07.12.2012 13:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Celastrina argiolus (Linnaeus, 1758).

07.12.2012 13:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Should be moved!

07.12.2012 9:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yury! Would you please tell what are your Neptis sources (or references)? So you reckon that ilos isn't an orange Neptis, or this is absent in Russian Far East? Let's address Bozano. He says that Neptis tshetverikovi looks similar to Neptis thisbe. Clear distinctions are genitalia. Neptis tshetverikovi's ochre-colored marginal parts are reduced. Neptis tshetverikovi is smaller than Neptis thisbe. Many authors refer distinctive features that are easily found in various populations of both species.
Neptis themis and Neptis ilos differ from each other in venation and genitalia. The main distinction is that Neptis ilos's hind wing has a large white area.
Neptis themis, Neptis ilos and Neptis tshetverikovi, Neptis thisbe clearly differ in undersides (what in this case of no help).
I just tried to clear things out, don't declare myself pro in Neptis. Ready to discuss.

07.12.2012 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved to pamphilus "uncertain" just as the neighbour photo.

07.12.2012 0:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to pamphilus "uncertain".

06.12.2012 21:56, Lev Bely:

Adscita geryon?

06.12.2012 21:39, Lev Bely:

Zygaena osterodensis?

06.12.2012 21:34, Lev Bely:

Zygaena osterodensis?

06.12.2012 20:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Viktor! I was late to read this thread, quite short of time lately. I have a story to tell about what happened at the end of 50s in the past century that I heard in the 80s from Oleg Leonydovitch Kryzhanovsky (leading USSR and Russian carabidologist, now sadly late). So they were preparing this guide to insect pests to publish and (please abstain from drawing parallels) some "supervisors" insisted that each species in the guide would have Russian common name. So did they start inventing those. There was this beetle from the family Scarabaeidae called Pentodon idiota. As all Scarabaeidae were called "khrushchi" (chafers) and the genus group related to the genus Pentodon was called "navozniki" (dung beetles) and their larvae occasionally damaged corn crops, then a new name was "khrushch-navoznik kukuruzny" (corn dung chafer), "idiota" in Latin. Now let's remember who was the General Secretary in the late 50s and also his epic corn project in the north of the USSR. Once as a copy of the guide appeared before censors in The First Department... that was the story! I'm not against common names in general but as for insects... It's ok with such names as Peacock, Red Admiral, maybe a dozen more... You got caught in your own trap when said about "yellows", to which you referred brimstone that actually doesn't belong to the genus Colias (or those yellows) ;) Let this website be added with common names, though any user here should realize as soon as possible that Russian common names are kind of general thing and mostly inexact, they could be somehow useful for the first connection but if you're really interested in some precise data of what you photographed or spotted, then... you've got to dig into some complex Latin, alas.

06.12.2012 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Still asking.

06.12.2012 19:14, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Remove!

06.12.2012 18:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.12.2012 18:10, Sergei Kotov:

Euphydryas maturna (Linnaeus, 1758).

06.12.2012 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'd say this is quite worn-out Coenonympha pamphilus. The butterfly is small as well as on the second photo. Though don't know Oeneis norna at all.

06.12.2012 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'd say this is quite worn-out Coenonympha pamphilus. The butterfly is small as well as on the second photo. Though don't know Oeneis norna at all.

06.12.2012 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Indeed?

06.12.2012 15:41, Peter Khramov:

What a thing.

06.12.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Ok, will be in A. moorei.

06.12.2012 14:36, Juriy Rogozin:

I collated this one with photos of other Ambulyx moorei and description too, and I didn't find out a difference.

06.12.2012 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Yury, what did you approve, Ambulyx moorei or A. bakeri?

06.12.2012 14:27, Juriy Rogozin: This species is identified correctly.

06.12.2012 14:25, Peter Khramov:

Small improvements: the "community" form a new topic is now revealed by clicking on the link corresponds.By default, the form is hidden, leaving more space for comfortable viewing comments, in the "Classifications" except now shows not only the Latin names of the subsidiaries of taxa and taxa are indicated levels (family, subfamily, etc.) explicitly and immediately prescribed author and year of description.In addition, we now have a separate page with a list of all the labels of the blog - http://lepidoptera.ru/tags, and the right block is both popular and butterflies, and those who watch less often.

06.12.2012 13:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Will check it out at home.

06.12.2012 12:59, Peter Khramov:

I'll move to the exotics as that gets done.

06.12.2012 12:58, Peter Khramov:

Will move as the exotics done.

06.12.2012 12:58, Peter Khramov:

I'll move as the database of exotic species gets done.

06.12.2012 12:57, Peter Khramov:

So undetermined?

06.12.2012 12:57, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, there's the underside http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13916. What's your word?

06.12.2012 10:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What's its size, please?

05.12.2012 21:56, Lev Bely:

Melitaea britomartis?

05.12.2012 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are both dark and light ones, and Acosmeryx pseudonaga suits well this picture, though Acosmeryx anceus (Stoll, 1781), Acosmeryx shervillii (Boisduval, 1875), Acosmeryx omissa (Rothschild and Jordan, 1903), Acosmeryx pseudomissa (Mell, 1922) either shouldn't be excluded. The series shows they are different species. Gotta know what's the difference in appearance between them.

05.12.2012 20:49, Lev Bely:

What I think similar is only Acosmeryx shervillii, and even this has seemingly more contrast compared to pseudonaga. As for the rest from the list linked, they look quite different. Who knows.

05.12.2012 20:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are three very similar species in Malaysia http://www.lepbarcoding.org/sphingidae/species_checklists.php.

05.12.2012 19:16, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks, kept in rhymnus then.

05.12.2012 16:56, Stan Korb:

First, there's no such genus Rhymnaria. Second, this is without any doubt common Neolycaena rhymnus. Eckweileri has way larger white spots with different pattern, and the very butterfly is about 20% larger than an average rhymnus.

05.12.2012 16:35, Peter Khramov:

As for the names - of course, if anything, better. I consider that today and yesterday partly worked the blasted form data entry, which was the old field of local names, and new. I moved out all of the new standard, and the window for the local names are now found only at the bottom of the form.For questions - simply make a new topic in the "community" is similar to that of the Russian names, and ask. Yellow spots I missed the past, if they're really yellow, but it is not particularly white balance, please download the picture again.

05.12.2012 16:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far. Ok, I'll nudge Stas then.

05.12.2012 16:12, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.12.2012 14:47, Lev Bely:

Acosmeryx pseudonaga?

05.12.2012 13:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Kokshetau.

05.12.2012 13:39, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Dmitry, looked through your collection, that's striking! Did you really catch them all yourself?! World of countries you were in! Envy!
So where are you from originally? Altai?

05.12.2012 12:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Petr! Show this one to Stas, that's his field.

05.12.2012 12:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Chazara heydenreichi.

05.12.2012 12:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arethusana arethusa.

05.12.2012 11:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Chazara heydenreichi.

05.12.2012 11:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It's not what I think of you but of the use of common names. I see you're from Ust-Kamenogorsk! Nearly countryman.

05.12.2012 7:42, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Rhymnaria eckweileri (Lukhtanov, 1993), ID is approved by S. Toropov, Bishkek.

05.12.2012 6:25, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Good afternoon. Well, thanks for the explanation, and in general for the friendly steps to the meeting. As soon as I get some sort of extra. Try to add information.(if something is wrong, you can probably fix or remove?)
And yet, if you have questions on the butterfly - in what form and where can I ask?
And -Why you do not like the Apollo with yellow patches instead of red, in my opinion it is quite rare coloring. Even on your site, I did not see them?

05.12.2012 5:44, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Good morning! Already tried that. Thanks, now it's way more handy and clear. So check species once, twice and voila, get to know its Latin name. :) Besides, I don't need Russian common names as to foreign species beyond Russian-speaking countries. I think real, my interest will barely ever go far beyond the former USSR. I am as much respectful of some Heterocera moth from Madagascar as indifferent from the practical side :) Dmitry, you're brilliantly briefed all your thoughts in just three letters :) Kind of "if you only knew at least a small bit of what I know, you wouldn't stick your nose into the machinery of this whole structure that reins the World of Lepidoptera". No objections! I know that I know nothing, just I'm fascinated with life.
Petr, don't get sad about this Parnassius phoebus, I'll find it out one day. Let's wait for the summer, we've got lots of various Parnassius on here in mountains. Haven't yet set to work. :)
Whatever, I like your website more and more, some small details are really well-thought-out. And the search is fab!

04.12.2012 20:10, Sangmi Lee:

Dear all,

I am currently a collection manager at the Hasbrouck Insect Collection at Arizona State University, USA. During the past over 15 years I have been working on systematic research on Gelechiidae. I need to get some help to borrow some dried specimens to continue my research, especially species in the list below. However, I am interested in studying on other species in this family. Please help me to continue on my research. I really appreciate your support and help in advance. Here is my email address: microlepi@hotmail.com I will look forward having any words from you.

Family Species
Gelechiidae Keiferia lycopersicella Walsingham
Gelechiidae Bryotropha galbanella Zeller
Gelechiidae Bryotropha terrella Denis & Schiffermuller
Gelechiidae Phthorimaea operculella Zeller
Gelechiidae Symmetrischema tangolias Gyen
Gelechiidae Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)
Oecophoridae Exaeretia canella Busck
Gelechiidae Frumenta nundinella Zeller
Gelechiidae Keiferia glochinella (Zeller)
Gelechiidae Keiferia altisolani (Keifer)
Gelechiidae Keiferia inconspicuella (Murtfeldt)
Gelechiidae Keiferia colombiana Povolny
Gelechiidae Bryotropha plebeiella Zeller
Gelechiidae Scrobipalpa blapsignoa (Meyrick)
Gelechiidae Scrobipalpa ergasima (Meyrick)
Gelechiidae Scrobipalpa heliopa (Lower)
Gelechiidae Scrobipalpopsis solanivora Povolny
Gelechiidae Scrobipalpula isochlora Meyrick
Gelechiidae Scrobipalpula ilyella Zeller
Gelechiidae Gnorimoschema epithymella Staudinger
Gelechiidae Dichomeris tangolias Klunder van Gijen
Gelechiidae Megalocypha melongenae Povolny & Bradley
Gelechiidae Megalocypha microcasis Meyrick
Gelechiidae Scrobipalpuloides inapparens Povolny, 1987
Gelechiidae Tuta atriplicella Kieffer&Jorger, 1910
Cosmopterigidae Stagmatophora serratella Treitschke

04.12.2012 19:54, Peter Khramov:

So as usual, what photographers like, zoologists do not.

04.12.2012 19:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Even Yefetov couldn't identify this by such picture.

04.12.2012 17:18, Peter Khramov:

The data in the field "Russian names" and "The English name" (the lower part of the edit page), and can be administered without specifying the source. In order not to duplicate existing information, on each of the displayed data fields that are already on the site.The second difference of these fields from the "full" - the information can be made directly to batches. Ie if we have several new variants of names for a single species - just list them in the box separated by commas.

04.12.2012 17:10, Peter Khramov:

So since now supraspecies taxa may be as well searched by common name, say Lycaenidae by "blues" (please note this is only available in Russian version). Yet the offer of supraspecies taxa common names is still quite limited.

04.12.2012 17:08, Lev Bely:

Adscita statices?

04.12.2012 16:22, Peter Khramov:

I'll move this to "uncertain" once as the database of exotic species gets updated.

04.12.2012 14:34, Viktor Kolesnikov: This species is identified correctly.

04.12.2012 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Sigh. So boring it's all... Moved to apollo.

04.12.2012 13:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is P. apollo female.

04.12.2012 11:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Meh...!

04.12.2012 1:48, Peter Khramov:

Sy-nan the-don!

04.12.2012 0:14, Lev Bely:

Synanthedon formicaeformis?

03.12.2012 22:17, Peter Khramov:

Viktor, if you meant that your photos looked darker, this may have to do with some particular colour profiles set in the viewer you use, which obviously don't function here.

03.12.2012 22:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.12.2012 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus thersites.

03.12.2012 21:13, Lev Bely:

Polyommatus icarus female?

03.12.2012 20:13, Peter Khramov:

Ah, all but a few supraspecies taxa don't have common names compared to the names of species.

03.12.2012 17:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, male then.

03.12.2012 17:36, Peter Khramov:

Meh. Back to "undetermined"...

03.12.2012 17:08, Viktor Kolesnikov:

To Dmitry: You do contradict yourself! You said you didn't know common names and at once shared such curious facts. So as I suggested before, let's move closer to amateurs. :) Me personally, I'm pretty interested in how butterflies and moths are named in Russian Far East and why so. Please don't prune things down and tell me the basics as at least these I know. Large White is a unique name of one species as well as Black-veined White, whilst Aporia hippia has different common name on there.
The subfamily Coliadinae includes some beautifully named species such as brimstone. Anyway, if you're against confusing yourself with common names, so others can be of different opinion..:)
To Petr: Thank you for your clear explanation. Neither am I about to make revolution in taxonomy. Just want you all to understand my point of view. I have no intention to study an order of insects named lepidoptera. Just I like butterflies and moths that fly here, in Altai, all around, and I'm merely a photographer and nature enthusiast. So I found this website and was glad to get some new info and offer some photos of mine, which were kept unused. So I found it rather unhandy that the website taxonomy lacked common names of subfamilies and genera, which I had been used to (sorry for that:)).
Also! Neither I regard this whole discussion as dispute or anything of the kind. Just wanted to shake up your routine:) Bore to see your everyday "Moved to", "Agree", "Goes to", "Ok, corrected"..... Kidding!
P.S. Don't scowl!
Viktor

03.12.2012 15:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Assume neither of the genus Idea.

03.12.2012 15:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

03.12.2012 15:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

03.12.2012 15:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved to idea "uncertain".

03.12.2012 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Done.

03.12.2012 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Yep.

03.12.2012 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

To Lycaena dispar "uncertain", female.

03.12.2012 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena virgaureae.

03.12.2012 12:27, Peter Khramov:

The reason of using Latin names as basic ones I briefed above as did Alexandr and Dmitry. Still there is nothing to argue as common names are added everywhere on the website including catalogue and also autosuggested while searching (start your search with "swallowtail" or "yellow" and you'll get the list of all the species with such common names or parts of names). Some species do lack common names, but it's just a matter of time to complete the info. Since lately not only administrators/moderators of the website can do that but any registered user is free to add some data.

03.12.2012 10:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Viktor! I am not qualified entomologist (as most of users therein), don't use common names though, neither try to keep them in mind. As for your remark "sound a bit obnoxious as to common "Black-veined White" or "Large White" or "Small Tortoiseshell" or "clouded yellows" or even "Old World Swallowtail"", I'd like to say that clouded yellows (meant the genus Colias) are presented at least by 4 species here in my region. "Large White" is a name of every white-colored butterfly of the genus Pieris. Also, one who lives in Vladivostok knows Black-veined White as Aporia hippia not Aporia crataegi, or Old World Swallowtail does as Achillides maacki not Papilio machaon, not to mention pierid and clouded yellow butterflies. So common names can quite vary as to species depending on where they're used. Even can be inversed when a common name combines several different species. So why to confuse yourself with all these minor common names?

02.12.2012 22:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.12.2012 22:01, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain"...

02.12.2012 20:15, Lev Bely:

Pandemis something?

02.12.2012 19:19, Lev Bely:

Idea leuconoe ssp.?

02.12.2012 18:59, Lev Bely:

Cepora nerissa dapha?

02.12.2012 18:34, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Hi! Thanks for your reasonable elaboration. I agree on many points, there is this scientific system already working and well-done, no need to change it. Still I started this thread about the very website structure not thinking of changing "John Smith"s to "Jo"s whatsoever. Other websites use Latin names as well, but don't ignore common names what as I think does widen horizons and also don't deter amateurs off. Move closer to them! Your "nicknames", "Jo"s and "roughly translated from Latin" sound a bit obnoxious as to common "Black-veined White" or "Large White" or "Small Tortoiseshell" or "clouded yellows" or even "Old World Swallowtail". Still I believe that many butterflies and moths, birds and plants that grow, fly and crawl in Russia have their well-known and fixed common names (even "roughly translated from Latin"), and it seems rather imprudent to reject them.

01.12.2012 20:54, Peter Khramov:

The "common names" case can be divided into two parts such as of common names in general and of the use of common names on Lepidoptera.pro.
So speaking in general, common names of lepidoptera are so-called monikers or nicknames, which can be contrived and used by anyone and anywhere, thus they are usually not fixed and can't be trusted reference. On the contrary, scientific names are not some quirky invention of highbrow gentlemen for their own communication within "circle of privilege", but the one and only standard system of species names, in which each of them is fixed and referenced to those who introduced one (and where and why this or that). Say, "John Smith" is a proper, scientific name, whilst "Johnny" or "Jo" are nicknames, or "common name".
On this website species Latin names are definitely basic, though common ones are used as well as a search option and info. Then again, registered users are allowed to add common names ("Add info" link on each species description page in Russian version, not yet in English though), which can be even without references compared to so-called "proved" info sections of the website that can't be added with no reference. Now it's about 600 species (Russian version) completed with common names.
So if any of you have time to add common names, in Russian version you have all the tools to realize it. Also need to notice that most of species lack common names or have such roughly translated from Latin.
Summary: "John Smith" are and will be used as a basic form of species name on Lepidoptera.pro, but "Jo" and whatever else will serve as well and seen on species description page, autosuggested while searching species, in the right column of the Catalogue page, and now also on the Taxonomy page (font a little bit more pale than usual not to outweigh the main Latin name). All these valid for Russian version.
Notice: all mentioned above can be mostly extrapolated to use of common names in other languages as well, for one in English, though speaking of the very English common names, there's a difference since they have at least one trusted source of common names, which can be considered as accredited, so they traditionally use them often and widely even in scientific circles. Nevertheless, English common names are still monikers even not as much volatile and thus less valuable as Russian ones.
P.S. I dared to add the name of the post with a few clarifying words for this is rather popular question on the website.

01.12.2012 19:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to crataegi.

01.12.2012 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

01.12.2012 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

01.12.2012 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.12.2012 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.12.2012 19:50, Sergei Kotov:

Aporia crataegi (Linnaeus, 1758).

01.12.2012 19:49, Sergei Kotov:

Euphydryas maturna (Linnaeus, 1758).

01.12.2012 17:00, Lev Bely:

Robert Schumann's suite of piano pieces “Papillons, Op. 2” written in 1831 was inspired by Jean Paul's novel “Die Flegeljahre”. The masquerade from the last scene is brilliantly played by Claudio Arrau, great Chilean pianist also known as a best interpreter of Schumann's music.
Multi-instrumentalist, singer-songwriter and reputed experimentalist Sufjan Stevens doesn't seem to lack courage to try anything new as he easily varies styles from disco to folk and electronica, studies the oboe and English horn, makes his own films and provides soundtracks to other's, tours all over the world, improvises song names to get eventually “The Vivian Girls Are Visited In The Night By Saint Dargarius And His Squadron Of Benevolent Butterflies” and even cites the Bible. True peace dove.
Claudio Arrau plays Robert Schumann's “Papillons, Op. 2” (1831)

Sufjan Stevens, The Vivian Girls Are Visited In The Night By Saint Dargarius And His Squadron Of Benevolent Butterflies (The Avalanche, 2006)

01.12.2012 15:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lythria cruentaria, to "uncertain", might be Lythria purpuraria.

01.12.2012 14:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

01.12.2012 14:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coenonympha pamphilus.

01.12.2012 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, if these types of site and not at all in any way - it will certainly be nice if it gave it to the Old. If they kakbe there, but are called differently, or one kind of site and article he also divided into five - then reported details ought to be discussed further.

01.12.2012 11:07, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Thanks! I've already noticed that but anyway some common names do exist. Also if species in the catalogue were provided with common names, it would be way more handy (or more familiar) to amateurs :) For me personally the "blues" sounds way better than Lycaenidae. :)

01.12.2012 10:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter I laid the paper on the sources Lithostege, there a number of species that are not in the catalog, whether these types of scoring in the directory? Well, if zabivat, I postorayus let them spread.

01.12.2012 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

You got the things right, though there's still a con. Lots of species simply don't have common names. This website is not for high professionals but all interested in lepidoptera. :)

01.12.2012 9:14, Viktor Kolesnikov:

Hello! I've been here since lately and since I'm not a professional biologist, I find it's rather hard to deal with Latin names of species not completed with common ones, so have to seek for the latter somewhere else. I wonder if this is kind of conviction on here or established taxonomy rules. Some other websites on plants and birds are good with common names though. I might not get it right of how to operate the system, or is this website for high professionals only?

30.11.2012 23:37, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

30.11.2012 23:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.11.2012 23:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

30.11.2012 23:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.11.2012 23:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

30.11.2012 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.11.2012 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Puzzle.

30.11.2012 23:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.11.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to rhymnus.

30.11.2012 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.11.2012 18:02, Yuriy Karpov:

Seems men are another kind of "plant and butterfly enthusiasts", or they just are misfits. So this Yaroslavl Dolphinarium grabbed plenty of animals, but has no idea how to care them all.

30.11.2012 17:39, Yuriy Karpov:

Yes, male.

30.11.2012 1:21, Lev Bely:

Melitaea britomartis?

30.11.2012 0:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems like that.

29.11.2012 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Might be widely spread Lithostege farinata, or some Asian like Lithostege narynensis (lean to the latter, clear white) from Kazakhstan as well. Or anything else?

29.11.2012 19:59, Lev Bely:



Wildlife Photography Day will be held on December, 15th at the Central House of Artists, Moscow (RU). The photography workshop is arranged by the Union of Naturalist Photographers and National Geographic Russia magazine.
Special guests to hold a speech are Sophie Stafford, editor-in-chief of the BBC Wildlife Magazine (UK), Cristina Goettsch Mittermeier, founder of the International League of Conservation Photographers ILCP (US) and Paul Nicklen (Canada), Arctic and Antarctic wildlife photographer, winner of the Veolia Environnement Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2012.
Participants will receive special collector edition “Best photos” of National Geographic magazine.
The event starts 12:00 (midday) at the Central House of Artists, 10 Krymsky val, Moscow (RU). 1000 roubles admission fee. For further details and registration info see the Union of Naturalist Photographers website: http://naturephotographer.ru/fest.
Union of Naturalist Photographers, http://naturephotographer.ru, National Geographic Russia, http://www.nat-geo.ru
Photo: Paul Nicklen, http://naturephotographer.ru

29.11.2012 19:39, Viktor Kolesnikov: This species is identified correctly.

29.11.2012 18:48, Lev Bely:

Erebia theano?

29.11.2012 18:33, Lev Bely:

Neolycaena rhymnus?

29.11.2012 18:03, Sergei Kotov:

Heteropterus morpheus (Pallas, 1771).

29.11.2012 18:02, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

29.11.2012 18:02, Sergei Kotov:

Siona lineata (Scopoli, 1763).

29.11.2012 18:01, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

29.11.2012 18:00, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

29.11.2012 17:59, Sergei Kotov:

Anania funebris (Strom, 1768).

29.11.2012 16:24, Lev Bely:

Melanargia russiae?

29.11.2012 16:21, Lev Bely:

Minois dryas?

29.11.2012 16:05, Lev Bely:

Brenthis daphne?

29.11.2012 15:25, Lev Bely:

Melitaea cinxia?

29.11.2012 14:55, Lev Bely:

Colias hyale?

29.11.2012 14:49, Lev Bely:

Melanargia russiae?

29.11.2012 14:38, Lev Bely:

Zygaena purpuralis?

28.11.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Again to sinapis "uncertain".

28.11.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved to sinapis "uncertain" just as the neighbour photo.

28.11.2012 22:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved to sinapis "uncertain".

28.11.2012 21:07, Peter Khramov:

Despite this has a similar appearance, S. kathyae, afaik, is an American species and absent in Russia.

28.11.2012 21:05, Peter Khramov:

Soon I'll update the database with loads of exotic species, then will move this one to them.

28.11.2012 21:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to the males.

28.11.2012 20:57, Peter Khramov:

Fixed. Monitor might change it, but I did overcorrect this as well.

28.11.2012 18:51, Lev Bely:

Indeed, where do dolphins look at?

28.11.2012 18:24, Peter Khramov:

"Applicants must be females..." I wonder when will it become possible to hang on gallows for such a requirement?

28.11.2012 15:16, Lev Bely:


Exhibit Guide, Tropical Butterfly Greenhouse, Yaroslavl (Russia)
Yaroslavl Dolphinarium has an opening for Exhibit Guide to work in the Tropical Butterfly Greenhouse.
Duties include leading excursions for visitors, butterfly care.
Applicants must be females aged 20 years or older, have good oral and communication skills, butterfly and plant enthusiast.
Full-time 9—21 job, 2/2 shift schedule. Free lunches, bus expenses (#104 route) after 2 months of work. >12000 roubles per month salary.
Contact: to schedule an appointment please call (4852) 99-44-77 or apply on http://hh.ru/vacancy/6867324 or http://hh.ru/vacancy/6890907.
General Manager, Tropical Butterfly Greenhouse, Yaroslavl
Yaroslavl Dolphinarium has also an opening for General Manager to the Tropical Butterfly Greenhouse.
Duties include overall planning, team and recruitment management, promotion and service development.
Applicants must be aged 23 or older, have Master's degree or 2-year general management experience. General management/sales management experience desirable.
Full-time 5/2, 9—18 job. Salary is negotiable.
Contact: call (4852) 99-44-77.
Finance Manager, Butterfly Conservation, UK
Butterfly Conservation has an opening for Finance Manager to work in its Head Office, East Lulworth.
£25,859 — £30,020 pa (dependent on experience) plus 5% pension contribution.
Do you have experience of charity accounts? Are you a team player with a hands on approach?
Butterfly Conservation is looking for a new full-time Finance Manager to fit into and supervise our well established Finance Team.
Working under the direct supervision of the Director of Finance & Administration, you will need an excellent level of technical finance knowledge. Practical experience of purchase and sales ledgers, management accounts, tax and year-end preparation are also essential.
Closing date for applications: noon on Monday 3 December 2012.
Read more and download the application pack on http://www.butterfly-conservation.org/list_item/13/current_vacancies.html?ListId=53.
Contact: call 01929 400209 or info@butterfly-conservation.org.
HeadHunter, http://hh.ru, Yaroslavl Dolphinarium, http://yardelfin.ru, Butterfly Conservation, http://www.butterfly-conservation.org
Photo: larva, Thailand

27.11.2012 19:35, Lev Bely:

Synanthedon kathyae? Or ssp.

27.11.2012 18:07, Lev Bely:

Meant Amplypterus mansoni takamukui? Seems a typo.

27.11.2012 17:22, Roman Ishin:

Cabera exanthemata (Scopoli, 1763) male.

27.11.2012 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Suggest to keep it anyway. It looks different from the neighbour images that are actually few.

27.11.2012 15:58, Lev Bely:

Monitor trouble? For I see a pale green leaf and a a lurid background.

27.11.2012 15:06, Andrey Ponomarev:

Petr, what happened to the photo? I see weird red background and blue leaf what's inaccurate?

26.11.2012 21:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.11.2012 20:31, Roman Ishin:

Satyrium spini spini ([Denis et Schiffermuler], 1775).

26.11.2012 17:41, Lev Bely:


One-act chamber pastoral opera “Vladimir in Butterfly Country” was staged on November 16th at the Old First Church, San Francisco (US), score by Ann Callaway and Jaime Robles' libretto.
One may guess from the title this is kind of dedication to Vladimir Nabokov well-known not only as a great novelist and ruthless critic who scorched his colleagues of the pen and paper, but also professional entomologist especially keen on butterflies with passion to blues (Lycaenidae family). Incidentally, his first job in the US where he escaped in 1940 from Nazi-occupied France was at the American Museum of Natural History.
Jaime Robles' libretto, which is a modernized version of traditional pastoral, represents a vivid and imaginative narrative describing nature's beauty. It culminates in a moment when butterfly hunter Vladimir (performed by bass Richard Mix) meets a newly emerged butterfly, the rare blue that's performed by soprano Erina Newkirk. Frustrated, he is trying to explain his aspiration to preserve her beauty, the butterfly nevertheless wants nothing but to be free and fly.
The narrative ends with Vladimir's turning into butterfly that flies away with the blue.
The opera is staged by Daniel Labov Dunne who accompanied by Jenny Donohue overtured the performance with reading some of Nabokov's butterfly reflections, not referring his distinctly scholarly writings though.
The very Vladimir's encounter with the blue alludes to the one between the major characters in Nabokov's most argued novel “Lolita”, Humbert Humbert and Lolita. Curious that, as it's said, Nabokov actually might have met that rare blue from Robles' libretto during his entomological journey across America when he was also working on “Lolita” at the time.
Yet the plot line and plentiful, meaningful context might have been developed in many different ways, especially because it's embodied in the opera, the music in “Vladimir in Butterfly Country” appears to be a little bit “toothless” in a way. Occasionally it just refers to brighter “Chansons de Bilitis” with Claude Debussy's two flutes and the soprano in Igor Stravinsky's early opera “The Nightingale”. These associations anyhow arise thanks to the chamber ensemble's well playing: Tod Brody (flute), Carla Wilson (bassoon), Michael Seth Orland (piano) and Callaway herself (percussion).
Examiner.com, http://www.examiner.com
Photo: Vladimir Nabokov, http://www.examiner.com
Erina Newkirk and Richard Mix in “Vladimir in Butterfly Country”

26.11.2012 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Though this very ssp. seems to belong to Ambulyx bakeri, or what?

26.11.2012 16:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Ambulyx moorei as it's a synonym if I get it right.

26.11.2012 16:40, Peter Khramov:

Let's wait for Dmitry.

26.11.2012 16:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.11.2012 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Yep.

25.11.2012 18:42, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to Vanessa cardui.

25.11.2012 18:41, Peter Khramov:

What a green smiley...

25.11.2012 18:35, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

25.11.2012 18:16, Roman Ishin:

Right, that's the move.

25.11.2012 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Incidentally, there's larva in the photo.

25.11.2012 15:42, Andrey Ponomarev:

This looks worn. Ok, let's wait for the new one.

25.11.2012 15:39, Eugene Davkaev:

Vanessa cardui (Linnaeus, 1758), see http://macroclub.ru/gallery/showphoto.php/photo/30661/cat/808.

25.11.2012 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Andrey, better to add that new and then remove, isn't it? Since this one illustrates the species...

25.11.2012 12:08, Andrey Ponomarev:

Petr, would you please remove this photo? I'll add later another one, the new.

25.11.2012 12:05, Andrey Ponomarev:

One more to correct.

25.11.2012 5:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could be moved to Heliconius ismenius telchina (Doubleday 1847), "uncertain". Guess this won't be identified further for no other versions suggested (at least, I do not have more).

24.11.2012 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

24.11.2012 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Right, corrected.

24.11.2012 22:51, Andrey Ponomarev:

Sorry, there's the same thing, Cabera pusaria is misplaced.

24.11.2012 22:49, Andrey Ponomarev:

My lapse again, Eupithecia nanata must not be in "Other photos of the species".

24.11.2012 14:12, Lev Bely:

Dear friends, since now the Saturday and Sunday musical stories will be combined in one post tagged “music” as usual. It should be interesting to see how they're matched together and as well more handy to make your own themed playlists like “Weekends with Lepidoptera”, or “Beer time”, or whatever else.
So today we've got these two to share, the “Ren” song by Filipino American California-based rock band Moonpools & Caterpillars and the “Caterpillar Playground” by American indie rock trio Nurses from Portland.
Moonpools & Caterpillars' “Ren” feels exactly like those very 90's when on Christmas grandmas were not performing in Skype, but bustled around the kitchen cooking pies, whilst their grandkids drove home fast sipping hot coffee and listening loud to the “Ren” or sort of, leaving Santa and his eager reindeers far behind.
Nurses' “Caterpillar Playground” is as likely to be from those days as well, when tambourine dance meant merely tambourine dance and nothing more, and unreasonable joy wasn't deemed as a protest action, mental disorder symptom, civil disobedience or another anti-glamourous and inappropriate activity.
Moonpools & Caterpillars, Ren (Lucky Dumpling, 1995)

Nurses, Caterpillar Playground (Apple's Acre, 2009)

24.11.2012 12:47, Peter Khramov:

So what, guys, any opinions more?

24.11.2012 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14906.

24.11.2012 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14906.

24.11.2012 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14906.

24.11.2012 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.11.2012 12:45, Peter Khramov:

To insolita "uncertain" or 50/50?

24.11.2012 12:44, Peter Khramov:

What's about the location or/and flight time, may these be the key?

24.11.2012 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

24.11.2012 12:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.11.2012 12:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 12:39, Peter Khramov:

Maxim, any objections?

24.11.2012 12:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 12:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 12:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.11.2012 12:37, Peter Khramov:

To "identified" then?

24.11.2012 12:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 2:00, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 1:26, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.11.2012 1:22, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.11.2012 1:14, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.11.2012 1:13, Roman Ishin:

Epirrhoe tristata (LINNAEUS, 1758) differs from a similar hastulata with its fringe: http://www.lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Epirrhoe_Tristata.

24.11.2012 1:05, Roman Ishin:

Xanthia icteritia (Hufnagel, 1766).

24.11.2012 0:55, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.11.2012 0:33, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.11.2012 0:19, Roman Ishin:

Looks very similar to P. icarus.

24.11.2012 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 0:17, Peter Khramov:

To "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 0:15, Peter Khramov:

Yury, would you please comment the ID? Since we've got no C. adultera yet...

24.11.2012 0:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

24.11.2012 0:13, Peter Khramov:

The author of the photo seems to tend to oversaturate colors, though it also depends on monitor...

24.11.2012 0:12, Roman Ishin:

Wings are horribly miscoloured.

24.11.2012 0:10, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

24.11.2012 0:10, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

23.11.2012 23:53, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

23.11.2012 23:49, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

23.11.2012 23:46, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

23.11.2012 23:44, Roman Ishin:

Most likely to be C. adultera.

23.11.2012 23:38, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

23.11.2012 23:38, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

23.11.2012 23:37, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

23.11.2012 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

23.11.2012 23:34, Peter Khramov:

The antennae go to "identified successfully".

23.11.2012 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Cyclophora pendularia.

23.11.2012 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Dunno what's the species, but definitely male!

23.11.2012 22:49, Lev Bely:

Isn't this Heliconius ismenius telchina? Or another subspecies.

23.11.2012 20:23, Lev Bely:

Antheraea helferi male?

23.11.2012 19:56, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

23.11.2012 19:54, Roman Ishin:

Cyclophora pendularia (Clerck, 1759).

23.11.2012 19:50, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

23.11.2012 19:47, Roman Ishin:

Peridea anceps (Goeze, 1781) male.

23.11.2012 18:31, Roman Ishin:

Idaea straminata (BORKHAUSEN, 1794).

23.11.2012 18:21, Roman Ishin:

Idaea straminata (BORKHAUSEN, 1794).

23.11.2012 15:52, Vlad Proklov:

Rather malinella.

23.11.2012 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm not talking but of the right one, checked out the left too, no versions, alas.

23.11.2012 11:24, Peter Khramov:

"This is" means the right one or not?

23.11.2012 0:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Oleria amalda too, just another subspecies.

22.11.2012 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Move this to "uncertain".

22.11.2012 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

An Ecuador subspecies Oleria amalda modesta (Haensch, 1903).

22.11.2012 21:31, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

22.11.2012 21:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Oleria amalda.

22.11.2012 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Folks, if you've got something to oppose the ID, please comment. Should be moved at least to "uncertain", such a stunner.

22.11.2012 19:20, Roman Ishin:

Amphipoea fucosa/lucens, needs genitalia examination for sure identification.

22.11.2012 18:51, Roman Ishin:

Cleora sp, cinctaria/insolita coloured form.

22.11.2012 18:33, Roman Ishin:

Idaea aversata (LINNAEUS, 1758): http://www.lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Idaea_Aversata.

22.11.2012 18:32, Peter Khramov:

Great. Goes to.

22.11.2012 18:07, Roman Ishin:

Dolbina tancrei, Dubatolov's post #171: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=408115&st=150.

21.11.2012 23:12, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, here's the underside: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13923. Is it this or not?

21.11.2012 22:26, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, have you uploaded the underside or not yet?

21.11.2012 22:13, Lev Bely:

Oxyambulyx subocellata bakeri?

21.11.2012 22:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Hypolimnas bolina so far.

21.11.2012 21:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Tanaecia lepidea.

21.11.2012 21:49, Lev Bely:

Yponomeuta padella?

21.11.2012 21:48, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

21.11.2012 20:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved the photo to D. militaris, "uncertain".

21.11.2012 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.11.2012 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems right!

21.11.2012 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Helicoverpa armigera.

21.11.2012 19:59, Peter Khramov:

What a thing!

21.11.2012 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Andrey, your last load of photos is just perfect.

21.11.2012 18:42, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Dudusa synopla???

21.11.2012 13:29, Svetlana Shchavelina:

Dysphania militaris???

20.11.2012 22:27, Lev Bely:



Mulberry leaves are now coming from different parts of Waiheke island to Surfdale for craftswoman Skate, or exactly for her silk worms.
Skate's hard-working silk worms got their glory along with considerable supplies of mulberry leaves right after the story of Skate's silk industry had appeared on Stuff.co.nz in the Waiheke Marketplace. People from across the island responded to Skate's call for mulberry leaves and now they're sending them over to her silk worms.
The latter seem to feel pretty good about that: they've just entered into their final stage and now are eagerly weaving fancy cocoons.
Skate's patiently waiting for them to get their work done and eventually crawl into their little canary-coloured “homes”, from which they are sadly never meant to come out. Skate is clearly not excited with the next step to do as she should put cocoons into hot water with all the worms inside. This is needed for to untangle the cocoons, each of which is weaved with one single silk thread that's of about 1.5 km length!
This thread is such fine that, as Skate says, all that could be created would be something as small as a pair of silk knickers.
“I love silk. It is a living fibre and I enjoy painting it.”
The post is illustrated with a photo of Skate posing in a brand new tailored cape made with a bit of cloth hand-painted by Skate.
She got so inspired with a collective positive response to her story that now Skate's spreading her skills in the island's primary and Steiner schools, and the kindergarten. She says she has enjoyed recounting the silk creation process to a new generation.
Still Skate has a few cocoons kept for the forthcoming silk moths to give birth to a new offspring and the silk worms that will weave lots of new silk for neat-handed Skate.
Stuff.co.nz, http://www.stuff.co.nz
Photo: craftswoman Skate with her cocoons, http://www.stuff.co.nz

20.11.2012 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, there are plenty of them. And the common, "academic" colouring is likely to be rather as #14150 has or of the kind. I usually happen to meet dark males mainly, but normally they shouldn't have been to.

20.11.2012 17:24, Peter Khramov:

Melanistic male!

20.11.2012 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male and female. Melanistic male is on the right, while female is on the left (females are usually larger and less prone to melanism).

20.11.2012 14:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

XM, wow. And I did not believe them .. Honestly. Boom try :)

20.11.2012 12:54, Lev Bely:

This doesn't look like the neighbour ones, ginger-coloured. Though now checking out them on http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t362944-50.html, see myself they can vary quite a lot.

20.11.2012 12:14, Peter Khramov:

Yes, a thousand looks nice. There is a temptation and leave nothing else to post: -) So join, Basil, do not be tempted!

20.11.2012 12:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.11.2012 2:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Congratulations to the Jubilee 1000 Basil komentom. keep it up to 10000. :)

20.11.2012 2:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lythria purpuraria.

20.11.2012 2:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, it's Noctuinae, Euxoa genus, species?

20.11.2012 1:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

The moth is identified right. Lev, you happen to identify correctly even those species I wouldn't dare to without dissection, and at the same time you get confused by some evident ones.

19.11.2012 23:15, Lev Bely:

I might be wrong but this moth doesn't seem to be Agrochola circellaris. Wrongly classified?

19.11.2012 23:14, Lev Bely:

Hoplodrina sp.?

19.11.2012 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I suffered, but I pay attention to the future: if the genus is already there, then do not start a new same with the other parent taxon. You just need to signal to me and I bear the old with the same first name for the new parent (as is now done for Asota) ...

19.11.2012 17:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.11.2012 17:25, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain" so far.

19.11.2012 17:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

19.11.2012 17:24, Peter Khramov:

Any versions more?

19.11.2012 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain". Opinions welcome.

19.11.2012 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain". Please add other versions if you have any.

19.11.2012 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain". Other versions welcome.

19.11.2012 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, please add the referenced species, I'll put this to "uncertain"...

19.11.2012 17:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

19.11.2012 17:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14863.

19.11.2012 17:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14863.

19.11.2012 17:16, Peter Khramov:

Since no any versions, move to Z. trifolii "uncertain".

19.11.2012 17:16, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

19.11.2012 17:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.11.2012 17:15, Peter Khramov:

So what, to similis "uncertain" or elsewhere?

19.11.2012 17:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

18.11.2012 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.11.2012 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

18.11.2012 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.11.2012 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

18.11.2012 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

18.11.2012 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

18.11.2012 19:37, Lev Bely:

Paolo Zavallone is not only remarkable for his impressive moustache, but that he's persona grata for those who are fed up with Celentano, but not with Italy. No moustache seen in Papillon Rouge, but this song positively would be a final touch to any Italian-themed gathering.
Paolo Zavallone & His Orchestra, Papillon Rouge (1976)

17.11.2012 23:55, Lev Bely:

Melese sp.?

17.11.2012 23:33, Lev Bely:

Melese sp.

17.11.2012 22:02, Lev Bely:

Synchlora irregularia?

17.11.2012 19:37, Sergey Novitckiy:

Cameraria ohridella, the horse-chestnut leaf miner.

17.11.2012 14:24, Lev Bely:

Andrei Khrzhanovsky, the amazing wizard and great master of animation, makes films that seem to appeal neither to children nor to adults, but to the world as a whole. So does his philosophical parable “Butterfly”, which could be as likely watched on earth, in the sky or even on some remote planet as well where this would be accurately studied (would like to believe). The accompanied music is written by Alfred Schnittke whom you can never have too much of, just as with Khrzhanovsky.
Andrei Khrzhanovsky, Butterfly (1972)

17.11.2012 0:30, Lev Bely:

Alucita sp.

16.11.2012 23:28, Lev Bely:

Gillmeria pallidactyla?

16.11.2012 23:08, Lev Bely:

Eupterote naessigi?

16.11.2012 22:46, Lev Bely:

Oxyptilus pilosellae?

16.11.2012 22:46, Lev Bely:

Oxyptilus pilosellae?

16.11.2012 22:09, Lev Bely:

Merrifieldia baliodactylus?

16.11.2012 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's where I didn't see. Though just posted there one of mine to clear up. Now rather think that's the one.

16.11.2012 21:25, Lev Bely:

Gillmeria pallidactyla?

16.11.2012 21:21, Lev Bely:

Isn't this right as one there, the upper left? http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t133596-14350.html (mikee, 20.02.2011 16:14 post and below from Nordsud).

16.11.2012 21:16, Lev Bely:

Platyptilia gonodactyla?

16.11.2012 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Looks not like one (digged all over the web, and that one has a different underside).

16.11.2012 20:50, Lev Bely:

Belenois java?

16.11.2012 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P.S. This is me kind Asota Hübner, 1819 was doing there and not look.
By the way: the photo of the two species of this genus are waiting to transfer (# 11453 and # 12491).

16.11.2012 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rather difficult to dissect digital images.
:)
Opposed to count and compare genes. :)

16.11.2012 17:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caradrina clavipalpis.

16.11.2012 17:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Euthrix albomaculata.

16.11.2012 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably???

16.11.2012 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Loepa cynopsis (Nässig & Suhardjono 1989).

16.11.2012 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter here: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23662 should be removed Aganainae (born just Asota called). It was in a hurry, I do not go there.

16.11.2012 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be moved here http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/23658 (made a thread). Also this: http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/14050 to the same.

16.11.2012 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena lonicerae.

16.11.2012 10:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena minos.

16.11.2012 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena trifolii maybe??

16.11.2012 10:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is very likely Zygaena osterodensis, Reiss, 1921.

16.11.2012 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena lonicerae (Scheven, 1777) it is.

16.11.2012 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

16.11.2012 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right, I mistook long ago. If possible, better change this to Russian Far East. Not pleased with that wasn't me who caught it.

16.11.2012 4:42, Peter Khramov:

Yeah. Shod in Italian ...

16.11.2012 4:41, Peter Khramov:

Goes to didyma. Roman, if don't agree, please comment.

16.11.2012 4:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.11.2012 2:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, this is rather similis. The light stripe along the anal area on its hind wing is wide opposed to vulgaris, which has a narrow one. :) There are also some differentia on the forewing, but they're unfortunately not seen on the photo. :) Not sure if all these are reliable enough (suppose, not quite... :))

16.11.2012 2:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

No way. M. didyma female.

16.11.2012 2:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Parantica aglea.

15.11.2012 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Really, guys, for dry specimens please have the location annotated, and not as a supplementary info/comment.

15.11.2012 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's the shot location :) :) :)

15.11.2012 22:40, Lev Bely:


Kazakhstan parasite wasps Mastrus ridens were put into New Zealand's orchards to execute a crucial mission, or simply to rid pipfruit trees of one of the most harmful pests, the codling moth Cydia pomonella.
If they get this accomplished, New Zealand will keep its status of a world's biggest apple manufacturer that uses minimum pesticides in growing apples.
1,000 Mastrus ridens wasps released into orchards characterize a new level in the longstanding fight with codling moths, which settled in these places over a century ago. C. pomonella moth that infests pipfruit trees such as apple and pear, is supposed to have been brought here from Tasmania or North America.
Plant and Food Research (part of Crown Research Institutes of New Zealand) has been working on the “Mastrus Wasp Project” the last four years. These parasitic wasps native to Kazakhstan and broadly used in the US against C. pomonella.
A female wasp attacks C. pomonella cocoon, pierces it with her ovipositor and lays eggs on the moth larva. When the wasp larvae hatch inside the cocoon, they devour the moth larva.
“We've spent the last two or three years testing it against a whole lot of other insects to make sure it only attacks codling moth and doesn't attack any of New Zealand's fauna and flora,” says John Charles, Plant and Food researcher.
Such the indirect method of pest control requires from the fruit manufacturers around $10 mln every year, but the status of the world's biggest fruit exporter turns out to be way more important to lose.
“There is zero tolerance of codling moth, particularly in some of the Asian markets,” says Mike Butcher of Pipfruit New Zealand.
So if the Hawke's Bay wasps score off the codling moth, the triumphants will be sent to save other New Zealand's regions. As Mr Charles adds, it will benefit home gardens along with commercial orchards.
3news.co.nz, http://www.3news.co.nz
Photo: Cydia pomonella
Plant & Food Research on how Mastrus ridens wasp lays eggs into the codling moth's cocoon

15.11.2012 22:03, Roman Ishin:

Not quite clear, how can this have "Location: Moscow region, Balashikha district, Zheleznodorozhny town" whilst this is "a Russian Far East species"?

15.11.2012 15:22, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved then to "uncertain".

15.11.2012 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Isn't this Chionarctia nivea, perchance? Could be moved at least to "uncertain"...

15.11.2012 15:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UPD: it was decided to look :)

15.11.2012 14:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well tady in vague it (removing the feminine, and there Mozhayev and which will be decided).

15.11.2012 14:29, Peter Khramov:

Basil, Femina, essno, Woody is not necessary. It downloaded the Italian who poorly understand English, so feel free to write in Italian "imago female" in the "name of the species."

15.11.2012 14:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added almost all except # 15136 Adulto femmina-something Latin, a strange kind of joking :) Or the author: https://www.google.ru/search?client=opera&q=Adulto+femmina&sourceid=opera&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&channel=suggest#hl=ru&newwindow=1&client=opera&hs=f8c&channel=suggest&sclient=psy-ab&q=Adulto+femmina&oq=Adulto+femmina&gs_l=serp.12...0.0.0.12654.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1c.6NNoeAVT9gI&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=d48d1cc52984db4e&bpcl=38625945&biw=990&bih=558 ??? H.Z.CH. (I get lost).

15.11.2012 1:48, Peter Khramov:

Dis-sect! Dis-sect! (chanting).

15.11.2012 1:40, Lev Bely:

Alexandr, thanks. Agree, the pattern looks questionable. Pity can't be identified surely.

15.11.2012 1:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

If not evident misidentifying, all nitidalis have this white spot in the middle of the forewing extended to the wing's bottom edge. All those moths you identified as Diaphania nitidalis have this spot of a triangular shape and not stretched to the wing's bottom edge as here http://v2.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxon=Diaphania%20sp.%204YB (not identified). It might be Diaphania nitidalis, but I wouldn't identify it as one not to make a mistake.

14.11.2012 22:44, Lev Bely:

Why not? Really curious.

14.11.2012 22:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Doesn't come up to nitidalis. The species is quite variable, haven't yet spotted such in the web though.:)

14.11.2012 21:58, Lev Bely:

Again Diaphania nitidalis.

14.11.2012 21:50, Lev Bely:

Ideopsis vulgaris contigua?

14.11.2012 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.11.2012 20:46, Lev Bely:

Melinaea mneme?

14.11.2012 19:44, Lev Bely:

Diaphania nitidalis?

14.11.2012 19:19, Lev Bely:

Diaphania nitidalis?

14.11.2012 19:11, Lev Bely:

Diaphania nitidalis?

14.11.2012 17:12, Peter Khramov:

People add pliz kinds of admin. Well, add, eh? ; - (((

14.11.2012 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Lately there were several reports of non-receiving the registration e-mail with password, there appeared no any even in the "Spam" folder. Meanwhile most users don't experience such problems. So the issue is being fixed at the moment, and till then in case you see no e-mail with password after registration, please e-mail me (main#lepidoptera.pro) from that very e-mail address you used for registration, and I'll send you the password.
UPD: fixed now. Account passwords deemed to be e-mailed properly.

12.11.2012 20:08, Peter Khramov:

Added the species and moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

12.11.2012 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.11.2012 18:31, Peter Khramov:

Experts, would you please solve it out?

12.11.2012 17:05, Roman Ishin:

Spread specimen needed and even with a photo of its genitalia, otherwise it's a pure guesswork. ;)

11.11.2012 15:03, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

11.11.2012 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the ID, moved to esmeralda.

11.11.2012 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Can't this be identified at least up to so-so species?

11.11.2012 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

11.11.2012 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

11.11.2012 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

11.11.2012 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

11.11.2012 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

11.11.2012 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

11.11.2012 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

11.11.2012 14:19, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:18, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:17, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:17, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:17, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:16, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:16, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:16, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:16, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:16, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:15, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:15, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:15, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:14, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:11, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:11, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:11, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:04, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:04, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:04, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:02, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:01, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:01, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 14:00, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 13:59, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 13:59, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 13:58, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 13:57, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 13:49, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

11.11.2012 13:43, Roman Ishin:

This is Geometridae male of the genus Alsophila. There are 5 species of them in South Prymorye.

11.11.2012 13:33, Roman Ishin:

Melitaea trivia trivia ([Denis et Schiffermuller], 1775).

11.11.2012 13:27, Roman Ishin:

Polychrysia esmeralda (Oberthür, 1880).

11.11.2012 13:22, Roman Ishin:

Zygaena carniolica (Scopoli, 1763).

11.11.2012 11:25, Lev Bely:

Everything you need for a good Sunday: year 1929, Judy Garland and a song of butterflies kissing buttercups. Goodnight!
The Gumm Sisters, Where The Butterflies Kiss the Buttercups Goodnight (1929)

11.11.2012 1:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.11.2012 1:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.11.2012 22:32, Lev Bely:


Twiga Cement (Tanzania Portland Cement Company, TPCC), manufacturer of portland cement in Tanzania, is about to build a butterfly farm at their Wazo Hill mining sites in Dar es Salaam, for to “improve biodiversity and ecological systems” of the area “and even attract tourists”.
Kelvin Ngongolo from the Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Kingupira Wildlife Research Centre offered this project after he won third place in The Quarry Life Award, an international competition that TPCC first led in Tanzania for their project “Can Re-vegetation of Wazo Hill Quarry Increase Butterfly Species Diversity and Abundance?”
In fact, Twiga Cement vitally needs to have butterfly farm or something of the kind appeared at their limestone mining sites. Even then it's gonna take some time for to the quarrel between TPCC and locals in Chasimba village would be settled. The latter keep occupying land intended for gravel mining, and they can't seem to retreat: the area simply lacks good agricultural land.
Ngongolo's research shows that there are many endemic species of butterfly around, which could not only attract tourists but themselves enhance local ecology. Without such butterfly farm the territory is likely to be eventually destroyed by mining. Polluted air and industrial waste are especially crushing.
So they explored limestone and gravel mining sites, both new and already destroyed, and found over 36 butterfly species that habited the area. The expert says, they will create a multiplier effect through pollination causing an absolute recovery of flora and the fauna and thus sustaining biodiversity and the ecology of the region.
As he explained, “…butterflies play an important role in ecosystems, acting as a pollinator, food source they are an all around indicator of the ecosystems’ well being…”.
Endemic butterflies were spotted as well in other parts of Tanzania, including the East Usambara Mountains.
Limestone is a wide-spread sedimentary rock that makes up 12% of all sedimentary rocks. It's quite multifunctional, widely used and mined all over the world. Limestone has been one of the most popular building materials for many centuries.
It consists mainly of calcium carbonate (used for school chalk) and constituted by sediment accumulations at the bottom of the ocean sourced from animal sinks and plant remnants. This layer has been constantly growing. Animal body structures like shells are a particularly good source of limestone.
Sadly limestone mining damages the environment since it produces highly alkaline dust that pollutes the air. This results in various health issues, especially in those who already have respiratory problems. Dust is as well harmful to plants: it occludes and injures their internal structures, damages leaf's epidermis and simply poisons the plant that can negatively impact its lifespan.
IPP Media, http://www.ippmedia.com
Photo: Euphaedra harpalyce, http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com

10.11.2012 16:26, Lev Bely:

The Butterfly Lovers' Violin Concerto (梁祝小提琴協奏曲) written in 1958 by two composers He Zhanhao and Chen Gang is one of the most famous piece of Chinese orchestral music in China and beyond. This concerto is based on an old Chinese legend telling a tragic love story about two lovers that were separated by the will of the girl's parents. Her lover died of sorrow, and she on the day of her marriage arranged by the parents threw herself into her lover's grave, where they turned into beautiful butterflies and never ever were apart. The concerto interestingly combines Western symphony orchestra style, Chinese pentatonic scale and traditional Chinese violin techniques.
The Butterfly Lovers' Violin Concerto, He Zhanhao, Chen Gang (1958)

10.11.2012 1:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

OK... :)

10.11.2012 0:11, Lev Bely:

Diaphania sp.?

09.11.2012 23:49, Peter Khramov: This species is identified correctly.

09.11.2012 2:01, Peter Khramov:

"(no underside)"
Evgeny, for these very cases there is a link "Other photos of the species" up on the right, so ;--)

09.11.2012 1:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, this is actually Ideopsis.

09.11.2012 1:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Scarcely it is. Looks like the same hylas (a very common species), hard to be sure enough though (no underside).

09.11.2012 1:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

No way. :) N. hylas.

09.11.2012 1:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO Pseudozizeeria maha.

09.11.2012 1:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

If mentioned San Martín is in Peru, then such polydamas does occur there... :) http://butterfliesofamerica.com/L/t/Battus_polydamas_streckerianus_a.htm

08.11.2012 23:12, Maxim Schwarz:

Neptis sappho.

08.11.2012 23:10, Maxim Schwarz:

Neptis sappho?

08.11.2012 22:31, Igor Sakhno:

I'd like to think this is Polygonia C-album, the shell is curved quite typically in where the forewing's placed (what's clearly seen). Further identification is on experts.

08.11.2012 20:16, Peter Khramov:

... slightly reminds of a muskox male...

08.11.2012 20:11, Peter Khramov:

I may be stuffed but wasn't it already there and turned out not to be polydamas? Or it was?

06.11.2012 22:38, Lev Bely:


A unique butterfly park will officially open in the next few months in Karnataka state, India. It was founded by college lecturer Sammilan Shetty and now located at Santhadi House in Beluvai village 8km off Moodbidri and 42km off Mangalore. This park makes up an ideal place for relaxed contemplation and camera exercises as well for everyone in nature photography.
27-year-old Sammilan S Shetty, who teaches at Lakshmi Memorial College of Hotel Management, has been building the park for the last two years and did well: now it has over 100 butterfly species including few endemics such as the Malabar Banded Peacock (Papilio buddha) with gorgeous azure and black wings.
Sammilan scheduled the official park opening for next year. As he told The Times of India, this will be a unique private butterfly park of the kind in Karnataka state with over than 100 species of bright and colourful butterflies fluttering freely among flowers.
“I have confirmed the presence of 102 butterflies with the identification two more species, the Tawny Rajah (Charaxes bernardus) and the Black Rajah (Charaxes solon) on (next-to-last) Tuesday. The actual number of butterflies in the park is yet to be ascertained as it is difficult to identify small varieties. Though the park was not opened officially, people from various parts of the state visit here on holidays,” Sammilan said.
“My objective is to conserve butterfly population, which is being reduced due to the cutting of host plants, deforestation, habitat destruction, use of insecticides, weedicides, forest fire and illegal poaching. Butterflies, which form an important part of food chain and important pollinators in nature, should be preserved. Its food constitutes of nectar from flowers, rotten food liquids, bird droppings, cow dung, minerals from soil, alkaloid rich plants, dead crabs, human sweat and so on. The 7.5-acre park provides environment with focus on nectar, rotten food liquid, alkaloid rich plants and importance is given on host plants too. About 3.5 acres is the secondary forest land where host plants have been identified and are being conserved. Host plants that support the larval stage of the butterfly are being grown in one acre and nectar plants in three acres,” he said adding that he himself got interested in butterflies making a project by his Zoology teacher in graduation course in Microbiology.
There are such rarest butterfly species in the park as the Malabar Banded Peacock (Papilio buddha), Southern Birdwing (Troides minos), Paris Peacock (Papilio paris), Clipper (Parthenos sylvia), Redspot Duke (Dophla evelina), Great Evening Brown (Melanitis zitenius), Large Oakblue (Arhopala amantes) and others.
The Times of India, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com
Photo: Sammilan S Shetty in the butterfly park, http://www.bangaloremirror.com
TV9 Kannada on Sammilan Shetty's butterfly park

06.11.2012 16:53, Peter Khramov:

All twisted... Corrected.

06.11.2012 16:53, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

06.11.2012 16:53, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

06.11.2012 16:52, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

06.11.2012 16:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

06.11.2012 16:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

06.11.2012 8:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio troilus.

06.11.2012 8:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio troilus.

06.11.2012 8:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

:) quite complicated

06.11.2012 8:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Battus philenor.

06.11.2012 8:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2012 8:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nothing but Battus philenor.

06.11.2012 4:45, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2012 4:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Papilio troilus.

06.11.2012 4:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Papilio troilus :)

06.11.2012 4:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Battus philenor.

06.11.2012 4:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Battus philenor.

06.11.2012 4:41, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

04.11.2012 18:31, Lev Bely:

Habitual Sunday crosswords might be changed to this butterfly kaleidoscope in the “Papillon” music video by Union Jack, the trance collaboration between two musicians Simon Berry and Claudio Giussani. Say, to identify all the species shown, count butterfly uppersides and undersides, or colours, or males and females. A nice extra is that you'll see butterflies everywhere the whole rest of the day, and even today's poor weather behind the window will seem much better through such “butterfly glasses”.
Union Jack, Papillon (Pylon Pigs, 2009)

04.11.2012 16:08, Peter Khramov:

Repeat [On].

04.11.2012 1:12, Peter Khramov:

Lord, please potestit system input about the kinds http://lepidoptera.ru/community/10613 and express opinions.

03.11.2012 21:30, Peter Khramov:

I recall that in the description page of the form, there are two main blocks: the formal characteristics (size, time of flight of, etc.) and detailed information indicating the data source. Formalities prostavlyayutyas administrator and moderators on the basis of data from the interface with the detailed information.But in the detailed information can now add your information to any user of the site. But! Just showing her (information) sources or marked "Private Message" when no such source.
If the source is not yet in the database site, it is necessary to add.To learn more about how and what to add, and to actually start adding info, go to the desired type and click on the link "Add information about a" (do not forget to login).
I recommend first to add a bit of data and see how that turns out.And making sure that everything is OK, and you and the program on the site reached full understanding, we can already hit the squares.

03.11.2012 18:22, Lev Bely:

Schwarzer Schmetterling (The Black Butterfly) is a song from the album series “Der Schwarze Schmetterling” by German rock band ASP (spelled “Ashp”). In a dark, dark town there was a dark, dark street... Where Alexander Spreng, the ASP frontman looking like no less than a cenobite from hell, speaks of the opposition between the forces of light and darkness, and as it's stated, the latter are embodied in the Black Butterfly. Alexander is believed to be on the light side, but who would dare ascertain this?
ASP, Schwarzer Schmetterling (Hast Du mich vermisst? Der Schwarze Schmetterling I, 2000)

02.11.2012 20:01, Lev Bely:

Evgeny, thanks, this was actually a guess of mine, concede it might be wrong though. If anyone has or will get the sure version, please comment with a source reference. Till then, I'll sign the species name in the post with a question mark.

02.11.2012 18:21, Lev Bely:



We may never know whether the animal world celebrates Halloween or not, but if they actually did, the pink underwing moth's caterpillar (Phyllodes imperialis) could be among the first nominees for the best Halloween costume. Looking at this, one may fancy aliens, extraterrestrials, any gattackers but the moth of the family Noctuidae, which is peacefully disappearing somewhere deep in the Australian rainforest.
This moth keeps declining even despite having such a fearsome caterpillar costume that comprises a few horrendous figures in one, like big strong teeth in a row, large eyes encircled with yellow and abnormally widened pupils. This amazing cosmic critter is rather rare to meet, still photographer Lui Weber managed to find it and take a few shots just by All Hallows' Eve.
P. imperialis itself is nearly a saint. Causes no damage, lives by itself in a deep subtropical rainforest at about 600m above sea-level, and spends its whole life by its host plant, a fragile vine shrub Carronia multisepalea.
“Sadly this moth is very rare I only know of a single adult seen last year so I do not have photographs of the adult yet. This southern subspecies is listed as nationally endangered in Australia.” said Lui.
One of the few P. imperialis habitats is south-eastern Queensland, where it's spread from Nambour to the border between Queensland and New South Wales. Yet the species still can be met somewhere else, since there are spots to be found out, Lui says.
“I was only known to breed in a single location in upland rainforest however this year I have discovered another three locations and a colleague has located one additional site making five locations in total.”
The New South Wales government has put P. imperialis on the species endangered list.
“Potential breeding habitat is restricted to areas where the caterpillar's food plant, a native rainforest vine, Carronia multisepalea, occurs in subtropical rainforest. Adult Pink Underwing Moths require the darkness supplied by the vine and other rainforest vegetation in order to breed.” it said.
Now the authorities are considering options of increasing P. imperialis populations.
MailOnline, http://www.dailymail.co.uk
Photo: P. imperialis caterpillar, Lui Weber / Rex Features, MailOnline, http://www.dailymail.co.uk

01.11.2012 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Whatever, Graphium weiskei seems to correspond Purple Spotted Swallowtail, yet who can be sure of all these common names, which can vary so much. And Euploea phaenareta is unlikely to come either, its common names look pretty different...

01.11.2012 4:21, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Correction: Graphium weiskei could barely ever be in Taiwan (this is a New Guinea species). The original text says "the great purple spot butterfly", so it's hard to surely name the species (probably, Euploea phaenareta). There is a list of Taiwan's butterflies, feels like reputable: http://www.google.com.ua/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=butterflies%20of%20taiwan&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CB4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FList_of_butterflies_of_Taiwan&ei=M7yRUPi2Ho_64QTNnID4Dg&usg=AFQjCNGN9yvpbVL2i9ZIa93N-VmJPi3HJA.

31.10.2012 2:19, Peter Khramov:

Brilliant post. Thanks.

31.10.2012 2:00, Lev Bely:


Chen Wei-shou can be called butterfly patriarch who headed Taiwan lepidoptera research. He now recalls him 6-year kid fascinated by the sight of “a flower that could move”. That was the starting point of his lifelong passion.
Today Chen is 81, and looking back he sees 70 years of life, 77 written books and one of the largest butterfly museums in Asia, no less.
A successful explorer who's lived an interesting life yet has things to worry about: today's Taiwan extremely lacks of butterflies, which before it had in plenty. Chen says that butterfly populations are now one hundredth of the level before industrialization.
“Taiwan used to be a paradise of butterflies. When I was a kid, one could easily spot butterflies even in Taipei,” Chen said.
Times went by and today among a few places where one can still see butterflies is Chen's butterfly museum, which he opened in 1972 on the campus of Cheng Kung High School, where he had worked as a teacher before he retired in 1996.
Local butterfly habitats were destroyed in the blink of an eye, when Taiwan made the rapid jump from agriculture to industry in the years after World War II.
“A lot of original forest was cleared out to make way for roads, homes and factories, and for the development of farmland,” said Lin Kuo-chang, an official with the Council of Agriculture.
“The widespread use of pesticides by farmers was also responsible for the massive disappearance of butterflies on the island.”
Territories along Taiwan's west coast got thinned out especially fast due to the light of the “economic miracle” that shined there especially bright. Many butterfly populations vanished in a wink, and these places became what Chen termed “a butterfly desert”.
Not only the economic boom was destructive to butterflies in 50—70yy. of the past century, when Taiwan turned into the “Island of Bad Luck” towards local lepidoptera. The very Taiwanese “contributed” to the butterfly decline: they just found a butterfly klondike right at their feet. Catching butterflies and making butterfly souvenirs appeared to be another great source of income. Then it became a real industry and butterfly trade soon made up one the most profitable Taiwan's exports in those years of rapid economic growth.
In the most successful years Taiwan exported 30 mln butterflies a year—most of that to Japan, and also to the U.S. and Europe.
Hard to cite statistics, but matter of fact, thousands of Taiwanese earned their living by one only butterfly trade for many years.
“Taiwan sold so many butterflies and butterfly products that the island ended up being called the 'butterfly kingdom',” Chen said. “Whether you like it or not, it supported many families.”
Five lepidoptera species that nearly all can be found only in Taiwan are now definite ones to concern about. However, it's already late for any concerns of the great purple spot butterfly (Graphium weiskei?), which officially recognized extinct in Taiwan. Three others, the broad-tailed swallowtail Agehana maraho, Magellan's iridescent birdwing Troides magellanus and the great purple emperor Sasakia charonda are on the list of endangered species and thus got under protection.
Authorities too don't stay aside: they organized butterfly sanctuaries and arrange special information campaigns. Every spring they also block a lane of a busy road in central Taiwan to protect the fifth endangered purple-spot butterflies, millions of which take their regular migration journey.
Chen himself long ago changed net to camera. His first documentary “Dancing queens of the Nature” gathered “Golden Harvest” national award in 1978, and those butterflies captured on film were his last caught since 1981.
“My collection of specimens had exceeded the museum's capacity. Besides, I felt I had collected almost every species that could be discovered in Taiwan,” he said.
“Butterflies helped Taiwan survive a difficult period. Now Taiwan people should do something in return for the sacrifices made by the butterflies.”
News24, http://www.news24.com
Photo: Chen Wei-shou, Mandy Cheng, AFP
Taiwan's butterflies

30.10.2012 16:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.10.2012 16:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Autographa gamma.

28.10.2012 23:34, Peter Khramov:

To argus, "uncertain".

28.10.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain".

28.10.2012 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

28.10.2012 23:30, Peter Khramov:

So what, guys, any approvals?

28.10.2012 22:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.10.2012 21:12, Yuriy Karpov:

Thanks for the amendment, so my collection just got the new species S.orbifer.

28.10.2012 17:15, Peter Khramov:

Added dozens of new species and synonyms, English names of hundreds of species, and most importantly - information on food plants for a thousand species of butterflies (see. Subsection "Food plants caterpillars" under "Detailed information identifying the sources" on pages of species).

28.10.2012 15:14, Lev Bely:

Japanese ska and butterflies: Motors band and their “Butterfly”.
Motors, Butterfly (Nude, 2006)

27.10.2012 14:07, Lev Bely:

One might think that butterflies and brutal ska punk are hardly compatible. However, this critter is not that fragile as it may seem. Guys from American band Chilled Monkey Brains, Tallahassee, Florida, evidently appreciate such endurance and thus got a whole song dedicated to it.
Chilled Monkey Brains, Butterflies (Chilled Monkey Brains, 2011)

26.10.2012 21:03, Lev Bely:


Aenetus virescens is a moth of the family Hepialidae and one of the largest native moths of New Zealand. Puriri moth as it's called has a 15cm wingspan for what this happens to get mistaken for a bat. This moth spends nearly all its life in the larval stage inside a trunk of some trees—eucalyptus, for instance, and this stage can last up to seven years!
Trees that serve as homes to A. virescens larvae, can be identified by trunk holes, from which caterpillar occasionally gets out when leaves its 7” shaped squat to munch on the bark around the hole. Having transformed into a moth, puriri leaves its home and the latter gets immediately occupied by a tree cricket named “weta”.
In fact, New Zealand's tree putaputaweta, or marble-leaf, is named for these very weta crickets, which settle down in the former puriri larvae homes, which in turn quite prefer putaputaweta trees to live in. Such single tree can be infested with many puriri larvae at once, and then it inevitably turns into a living block to weta crickets.
The more curious is that after seven years spent inside a tree trunk, puriri imagoes live just for two days and then die. They have no mouthparts they could use to feed, and their only mission is to mate and make offspring within these two days. Puriri can emerge throughout the whole year, though it's more likely to happen from October to December. Sadly, this native New Zealand's moth is rather rare to meet.
Guys from Nga Manu Nature Reserve in Waikanae still took their time and had patience to make a time-lapse video of the puriri moth emersion as it comes out of its wooden squat and spreads wings. Cricket, get your bags ready!
Stuff.co.nz, http://www.stuff.co.nz
Photo: puriri moth, Mangakotukutuku Stream Care Group, http://www.streamcare.org.nz
A. virescens moth emersion, Nga Manu Nature Reserve, New Zealand

26.10.2012 18:04, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2012 17:44, Peter Khramov:

The spot might be just overlapped with a hind wing as there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/4747.

26.10.2012 17:22, Alexey Semchenko:

Why no spot on its forewing?

26.10.2012 13:52, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved then.

26.10.2012 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

26.10.2012 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved off the "undetermined".

26.10.2012 8:28, Alexey Semchenko:

Me too, lean to Siproeta epaphus.

26.10.2012 1:55, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Siproeta epaphus.

26.10.2012 1:54, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2012 1:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Macdunnoughia confusa.

25.10.2012 21:29, Lev Bely:

A curious video from the National Geographic's “Untamed Americas” miniseries on how Arctiidae moths produce low frequency clicks to muffle the sonar that bats use to guide flight and prey. Thus a bat gets mislead and a moth masterly dodges the attack.
National Geographic Untamed Americas, Moth Jamming Bat Sonar

25.10.2012 19:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, you posted some quite curious Noctuidae, nice shots, but no location or time data. :(
Would you please be so kind to complete your initial upload?

24.10.2012 22:55, Lev Bely:

Even Godzilla the Great grounded his mighty arms before the face of our huge and fearless hero. The thing is that he had no such magic “eyed” wings, which could seriously scare not only birds but even people. That's the thing!

24.10.2012 22:09, Lev Bely:

Zygaena lonicerae?

23.10.2012 0:24, Peter Khramov:

The lunar rover moved off the stables to Sitochroa palealis.

23.10.2012 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14894.

23.10.2012 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.10.2012 0:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14894.

23.10.2012 0:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14900.

23.10.2012 0:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14900.

23.10.2012 0:21, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

23.10.2012 0:21, Peter Khramov:

Hm, well, the author seems to know better :--)

23.10.2012 0:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved to purpuralis.

23.10.2012 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Ok, that's even better. Moved to S. ternata.

22.10.2012 12:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

I seem to have been hurried, my friend helped me to identify it as Scopula ternata.

22.10.2012 2:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

It seems to be sitting on thyme? Ergo, purpuralis, granted that there are no similar species in Kazakhstan.

21.10.2012 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cabera exanthemata.

21.10.2012 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

How can one see this is a "pinned/dry" specimen?

21.10.2012 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lymantria monacha.

21.10.2012 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

21.10.2012 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

21.10.2012 19:39, Lev Bely:

Nearly the same was seen a couple years ago in the Former Imperial Stables in Saint Petersburg, Russia. Wonder if it's still there.

21.10.2012 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Yury, would you please comment this one and a neighbour photos of the species? Also lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14834.

21.10.2012 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved so far to icarus, "uncertain"...

21.10.2012 17:39, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

21.10.2012 17:37, Peter Khramov:

Wee, what a stunning shot.

21.10.2012 17:35, Peter Khramov:

And this one is a batty.

21.10.2012 17:35, Peter Khramov:

Lunar rover.

21.10.2012 16:25, Peter Khramov:

Dog says yes!

21.10.2012 15:45, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks for approval.

21.10.2012 15:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

21.10.2012 15:44, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

21.10.2012 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved to bellargus.

21.10.2012 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.10.2012 15:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.10.2012 15:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9401.

21.10.2012 15:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.10.2012 15:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.10.2012 12:14, Lev Bely:

In 1997 an English alternative rock band The Verve released their best album “Urban Hymns” noted for the legendary song Bitter Sweet Symphony that became a worldwide hit and one of the greatest rock songs of all time. Another piece from this album, Catching the Butterfly, might not be as much hit, yet it can be replayed as many times as the “Symphony”, and never enough.
The Verve, Catching The Butterfly (Urban Hymns, 1997)

21.10.2012 2:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Argyreus hyperbius male.

21.10.2012 2:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Argyreus hyperbius.

21.10.2012 2:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Assume that's resting Carcharodus alceae.

21.10.2012 1:59, Eugene Karolinskiy:

... or icarus (which is more likely considering the shot location). Definitely not Plebejus argyrognomon.

20.10.2012 22:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.10.2012 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Doubt if it could be Polyommatus thersites?

20.10.2012 20:46, Yuriy Karpov:

icarus.

20.10.2012 20:19, Yuriy Karpov:

You might be right.

20.10.2012 13:25, Lev Bely:

A Winged Victory For The Sullen, Requiem For The Static King, Part 1.

20.10.2012 2:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This is totally not Pyrgus. Seems to be Spialia orbifer.

20.10.2012 2:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

bellargus male.

20.10.2012 2:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Colias hyale/alfacariensis.

20.10.2012 2:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

napi.

20.10.2012 2:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

bellargus male.

20.10.2012 2:02, Eugene Karolinskiy:

icarus.

20.10.2012 2:02, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Doubt it could be argyrognomon. (granted I don't know Siberian things quite as much.)

20.10.2012 2:01, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not sure.

20.10.2012 2:01, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Isn't this argus?

20.10.2012 2:00, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

20.10.2012 2:00, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

20.10.2012 1:59, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

19.10.2012 10:11, Lev Bely:


In 1965, when James Nebel was young, he got a large collection of butterflies and moths to keep and own.
Then it was called the Anderson Collection and reckoned as the second largest private butterfly collection in Washington. It comprised about 3000 specimens that Andrew Anderson had gathered throughout his life in Pateros, WA, a city with a today's population of 667 people. Nebel knew Anderson since the very youth.
“When I was a kid, he was a grandpa to all the kids in the neighborhood,” said Nebel, who now lives in Rosalia where he owns the Budding Rose Gallery with his wife, Diane Nebel. “And I guess I was the only one who was interested in the collection.”
Anderson was truly a passionate collector, he spent 46 years collecting and preserving local butterflies and moths, and occasionally exchanged some exotic species from around the world. He handed over the collection to Nebel when Anderson was 86.
The Nebels will display a part of the collection on Saturday, October 20th, at the Rosalia’s fall festival. “I’d say there will be a minimum of 800 butterflies and moths at the gallery,” said James Nebel.
Nebel not only managed to keep the collection, but also enlarged it while his living with family near Belt, Montana, where he continued to gather and preserve butterflies and moths. “I liked it,” he said, adding that, “the classification system and the naming of them all were kind of hard for me to grasp.”
Nevertheless, Nebel, as many fascinated collectors, didn't give up and added 500 more specimens to the collection during his years in Montana. “You are always looking for that rare species,” he said.
When in the spring of 1984 the Nebels' house in Montana suffered flood for the third time, James got to think about how he could protect the collection from damage and keep it safe.
“We felt like it needed to be stored under better circumstances,” said Nebel, who contacted Washington State University after that incident. In 1985 WSU professor of entomology Richard S. Zack arrived in Belt to pick up 45 cases with butterflies and moths, which today are kept in the university’s James Collection (named after entomologist M. T. James) in Pullman, WA.
“The Nebel donation was a significant addition, especially because of its historical value,” wrote Zack, who’s still at WSU.
Zack also noted that WSU’s James Collection houses approximately 35000 butterflies and 60000 moths for today.
Nebel estimates his private collection to have approximately 1400 specimens. “Getting ready for the show at the gallery we found one in an envelope that was from Germany and marked 1916,” James Nebel said. “I think that’s the oldest one we found.”
James carefully stores 30 cases with butterflies and moths in an unused home sauna. “The cedar siding in the sauna protects the specimens from being eaten by other insects,” Nebel said, adding that the larvae of the common flour weevil have quite the appetite for preserved butterflies. “You have got to be very careful how you store them.”
Now the Nebels who are both over 70 years old and retired from environmental health careers at the Spokane Regional Health District, ponder on what the collection will be in the future.
“I don’t think any of our children are interested in it,” Diane Nebel said.
Recently they got a request from the family of whom they call “Grandpa A”, or Anderson, and now they're preparing smaller cases with butterflies to give them to Anderson's great-grandchildren.
Albeit the Nebels don't catch butterflies themselves anymore, they have some definite palates. “I’ve always liked the big swallowtails,” James Nebel said, “they are colorful and big and beautiful.”
Diane likes moths. “Especially the big Atlas moth (Attacus atlas), they are just so fascinating,” she said.
The Nebels hope that many kids will come to the gallery to see butterflies. They even made a special invitation for Rosalia schools.
“If kids are really interested there are some specimens here that may not be in existence anymore,” Nebel said. “And if they have questions, then I still know a little bit about it all.”
The Budding Rose Gallery is open on Saturday, October 20th, 10 a.m. to 3 p.m., 510 S. Whitman Ave, Rosalia, Washington. Information: (509) 523-4278.
The Spokesman-Review, http://www.spokesman.com
Photo: James Nebel with his collection, http://www.spokesman.com
Richard S. Zack talks on the Washington State University's James Collection, which contains over 3 mln insects

17.10.2012 20:07, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

17.10.2012 17:51, Lev Bely:


Austrian researchers found out that wings of the Great Orange Tip (Hebomoia glaucippe), an Asian butterfly of the Pieridae family, contain venom. It appears that its white wings beautifully designed with contrast red-orange are not meant only to attract.
The more curious is the fact that the same venom is used by a quite different animal, a sea snail, which “shoots” its victims with a “harpoon” carrying a mixture of paralyzing venoms with that one H. glaucippe's wings contain.
The researches write that H. glaucippe likely uses the toxin as a defense rather than a weapon, and many of the butterfly's predators, including birds, ants and orchid mantis, avoid the wings. Hungry geckos, however, may not be bothered by it, because they eat the entire animal, wings and all.
Scientists examined proteins from the bodies and wings of H. glaucippe butterflies gathered in various parts of Southeast Asia. All test samples turned out to have a considerable share of a toxin glacontryphan-M. Only a marine mollusk Conus marmoreus, which is also called a marble cone snail, is known by now to have this toxin.
Now the researchers are trying to determine if samples of butterflies from other places contain the toxin, and studying other animal species to find the evolutionary connection between such different animals as H. glaucippe butterfly and a sea snail are. These pretty unlike creatures appear to be real war comrades!
The study was published on October 15th in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
LiveScience, http://www.livescience.com
Photo: Hebomoia glaucippe
H. glaucippe

15.10.2012 23:48, Lev Bely:


17th Annual Texas Butterfly Festival will take place in Mission, Texas, US, from October 25th to 28th. The Rio Grande valley, where Mission is located, is a well-known US region for its biological diversity. Here four ecosystems of the four valley counties meet: the local subtropical area makes a home for over 300 butterfly species, 512 bird species and 94 odonate species. In autumn you can enjoy there watching plenty of butterflies as well as other animals, and four festival days make up a perfect occasion to see all them alive in natural habitat.
Some of the key participants and events of the 17th Texas Butterfly Festival
October 27th, 7—10 p.m., Riverside Club Restaurant & Bar (214 E. Chimney Road, Mission) hosts “Dinner by the River Reception”, where Dr Robert Michael Pyle will present “The First Butterfly Big Year”. Robert Pyle is one of the most prominent butterfly speakers and teachers, the founder of the environmental organization Xerces Society that focuses on invertebrates, and also the author of seventeen books. Several of them are national award-winners and deskbooks for many lepidopterists: Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Butterflies, The Handbook for Butterfly Watchers and The Butterflies of Cascadia.
Other festival speakers include Dr Jeff Glassberg, Dr Ronald Rutowski, Dr Paul Opler, Mike Rickard, Bill Supulski and Evi Buckner-Opler.
Seminar topics: Functions of Butterfly Coloration; Searching for Blues in Western North America; The Beetles of Texas; What is Habitat: How the butterfly habitat fits into the larger wildlife habitat; Your Computer is Your DarkRoom; Monarch Butterfly Adventures and The First Big Butterfly Year.
During the festival you may join various guided tours to visit Rancho La Lomita Ranch, Santa Ana Refuge, Estero Llano Grande, Laguna Atascosa, Bentsen State Park as well as try River Pontoon Tours or explore local garden and nature sites.
National Butterfly Center invites you to take part in the Community Family Day on October 27th, 9 a.m. — 1. p.m. with various children activities that include painting, drawing, designing and other arts & crafts. The Community Family Day is free to visit.
17th Annual Texas Butterfly Festival calls on everyone who studies or just loves butterflies, welcomes professionals and amateurs, kids and adults to spend four exciting days in one of the most interesting regions of America. Tickets and registration info, full schedule, participant list and contacts are on the festival website: http://www.texasbutterflyfestival.com.
Texas Butterfly Festival, http://www.texasbutterflyfestival.com
Photo: Tarucus balkanica

14.10.2012 21:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

14.10.2012 13:46, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

14.10.2012 11:27, Lev Bely:

American rockabilly from 1958, Chuck Royal & The Sharpsters, You're Like a Butterfly.
Chuck Royal & The Sharpsters, You're Like a Butterfly (1958)

13.10.2012 22:52, Igor Sakhno:

Exactly.

13.10.2012 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Alien.

13.10.2012 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Nothing but the gold.

13.10.2012 16:15, Peter Khramov:

The ending is especially ace.

13.10.2012 14:37, Lev Bely:

The cult American alternative rock band Sonic Youth is as well good at ace performances as at being self-ironic: they chose Stephen Hellweg's clip with puppets heavily strumming guitars as the best in the fan video contest for their song Drunken Butterfly. Well, this is Sonic Youth just as it is!
Sonic Youth, Drunken Butterfly (Dirty, 1993)

13.10.2012 13:07, Peter Khramov:

Primor'ye region is classified with Erebia cyclopius only, so moved this over there, to "uncertain".

13.10.2012 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Where is that "there"?..

12.10.2012 5:15, Yuriy Karpov:

Erebia, either cyclopius or edda.

11.10.2012 22:24, Lev Bely:


This was as possible as to spot the well-done mount of an extinct dodo bird in the rubbish at a yard sale — barely ever. Tom Terzin, a developmental biologist from University of Alberta, Canada, never waited to discover a rarest well-preserved specimen of an extinct endemic Jamaican moth Urania sloanus of the Uraniidae family on a popular online auction eBay. Any hesitation was immediately overwhelmed by Terzin's professional interest and passion for collecting.
This glaring, gemstone coloured Jamaican moth, active in the daytime was last recorded in 1895. The reserve price* of the specimen was nearly $6000, what meant minus this moth in Tom Terzin's vast collection as he couldn't offer such a price. Then Terzin sent a message to his colleagues at Augustana Campus in Camrose, assuming that they could support him and help to get that rare moth before it would go to some large museum or private collection.
U. sloanus is one of the world’s most beautiful moths—if not the most beautiful one,” he wrote, noticing it cost about $25,000. “Unfortunately it is gone forever. There are only several specimens preserved in the most prestigious world collections, and the one offered on eBay is in a perfect condition, maybe the best-preserved specimen in existence!”
This both happy and sad letter touched Terzin's colleagues, and people started donating — some sent $50, other did $100. The first money were received in an hour of the letter. It was already $1700 in another half an hour, and the rest sum was collected in less than a day. 300 people from Augustana faculty including staff gathered even more than needed $6000.
Whilst contributing, the Augustana's scientific circles as well abundantly commented.
“Very beautiful specimen!” wrote chemistry professor James Kariuki along with his pledge. “I couldn’t stop thinking of all the chemical reactions producing such brilliant colours.”
“It struck me that we might need a soundtrack for this magical moth fundraising,” wrote music professor Alex Carpenter as he submitted a link to Johann Strauss’s Nachtfalter Waltz (“Moth Waltz”).
“I’m not crazy about insects,” wrote mathematics professor Bill Hackborn along with his pledge, “but your moth is really beautiful—even mathematically so—and the wildfire you started here on campus is irresistible!”
So the Jamaican rarity flew to the online auction light where it met its ideal customer, Augustana Campus, which was the one who offered the reserve price. Now U. sloanus is on its way to Camrose, to the campus and Tom Terzin who still feels struck by his colleagues' generosity. The specimen will belong to the University of Alberta and will be used for lectures and research, like in a course combining art and biology, or for public education exhibitions arranged by Tom Terzin with his own exotic collection.
Terzin is really touched by how the campus teamed up to make his dream real.
“It is a day I treasure in my heart, regardless of winning the moth,” he said. “I believed somehow from the very beginning that something important would happen, but I could not dream of the extent of support I received! What I feel is that we are one big family.”
“I’m always on the side of whatsoever things are beautiful,” wrote visual arts professor Keith Harder, paraphrasing the University of Alberta motto, as he contributed. “Though this moth will be less about what we win and more about how we win it. That little critter may well become emblematic about the kind of things we—as Augustana—are prepared to rally around!”
*Reserve price is a minimum price set by seller on eBay, though not seen to customers until one of them offers the price equal to the reserve one.
Augustana Campus, University of Alberta, http://www.augustana.ualberta.ca
Photo: Tom Terzin and butterflies of the collection, http://www.augustana.ualberta.ca

10.10.2012 15:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.10.2012 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lythria purpuraria.

09.10.2012 22:55, Peter Khramov:

Right, thanks, corrected :--)

09.10.2012 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author of the photo had identified this right. Sergey's approval followed.
;)

09.10.2012 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.10.2012 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

09.10.2012 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.10.2012 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.10.2012 20:08, Sergei Kotov:

Clostera pigra (Hufnagel, 1766).

09.10.2012 20:08, Sergei Kotov:

Clostera pigra (Hufnagel, 1766).

09.10.2012 20:08, Sergei Kotov:

Clostera pigra (Hufnagel, 1766).

09.10.2012 20:08, Sergei Kotov:

Clostera pigra (Hufnagel, 1766).

09.10.2012 15:15, Peter Khramov:

Can't see Neptis tshetverikovi in Sinev's catalogue. Are there any synonyms (neither found any)?

09.10.2012 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to salicicola.

09.10.2012 15:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14589.

09.10.2012 15:10, Peter Khramov:

So far moved to E. ausonia, "uncertain". If other angles could anyway help, nudge me.

09.10.2012 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

09.10.2012 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.10.2012 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

09.10.2012 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Wow!. Moved.

08.10.2012 19:11, Yuriy Karpov:

There are 3 orange Neptis species in the Far East that are thisbe, tshetverikovi and themis. N. themis has spots on the forewing, which don't spread over the back edge, whilst N. thisbe has a band on the hind wing that clearly widens at its inner edge.

08.10.2012 18:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dyspessa salicicola.

08.10.2012 18:32, Yuriy Karpov:

Definitely not Anthocharis, rather Euchloe ausonia or something of the same genus.

08.10.2012 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Bena bicolorana.

08.10.2012 18:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Bena bicolorana.

08.10.2012 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Bena bicolorana.

08.10.2012 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Bena bicolorana.

08.10.2012 18:18, Lev Bely:


Researchers from the University of Queensland, Australia, found out that caterpillar hair can cause foal death and abortions in Australian mares.
Dr Judy Cawdell-Smith and Professor Wayne Bryden, from the UQ's School of Animal Studies, discovered that pregnant mares contacted with hairy Oak Processionary (Thaumetopoea processionea) caterpillars tended to abort.
“This is an unusual form of abortion that was first reported in Australia in 2004 and is similar to a condition reported in Kentucky in 2002,” Dr Cawdell-Smith said.
“Researchers in Kentucky identified Eastern Tent Caterpillars as the cause of the US equine condition, Mare Reproductive Loss Syndrome.”
Similar miscarriage cases were also registered in the Hunter Valley in 2004.
“Studies conducted by veterinary epidemiologist, Professor Nigel Perkins, suggested the abortions were caused by caterpillars or poisonous plants,” Professor Bryden said. “No poisonous plants were found on any of the stud farms where mares aborted. Caterpillars were identified as the cause of the US problem but the same caterpillars don't exist in Australia. However, other related caterpillars were found on the affected Australian stud farms.”
“If you've ever seen a hairy caterpillar, it is unlikely that a horse would eat a whole one. What's more likely is that the caterpillar's exoskeleton — which is much harder to see in the grass — is picked up by the horse while it is grazing.”
“In our studies, both whole caterpillars and exoskeleton caused mares to abort.”
The study authors reckon that a swallowed caterpillar, or literally its hair, damages the intestinal wall of the horse, then bacteria get into the circulation and ultimately reach the fetus through the placenta.
“The subsequent infection caused by the bacteria in the fetus results in abortion,” Dr Cawdell-Smith said.
“These bacteria are found in the intestine of mares and normally don't cause a problem.”
“Interestingly, mares that abort have no ill effects or evidence of illness.”
The research was funded by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation and the Hunter Valley Equine Research Centre. Professor Bryden and Dr Cawdell-Smith have investigated this area since 2006.
The University of Queensland, http://www.uq.edu.au
Photo: Malacosoma americanum caterpillar, Lynette Schimming, http://eol.org

07.10.2012 21:59, Maria Pozdnova:

Could it be Acronicta stigosa if there's no megacephala?

07.10.2012 20:54, Yuriy Karpov:

What is this critter doing in the tree?

07.10.2012 20:52, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

07.10.2012 13:16, Lev Bely:

The Irish people are well-known for their bravery for many centuries, so is Claire Prendergast with her convincing guitar, which offers from this day forth “to advocate the rights of the caterpillar community”. Right after she's decapitated one of the community members, but who minds the details?
Claire Prendergast, Little Caterpillar (2011)

06.10.2012 13:32, Lev Bely:

Folk music and the Bahá'í faith are bread and wine of an English band The Bird and the Butterfly, the Morning Prayer of which sounds as it's performed by true birds of paradise.
The Bird and the Butterfly, Morning Prayer (Lighted Candle, 2011)
Morning Prayer by The Bird and the Butterfly

05.10.2012 22:27, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.10.2012 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Argynnis adippe.

05.10.2012 16:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.10.2012 21:48, Yuriy Karpov:

Sorry for mistake, this is Boloria eugenia female.

03.10.2012 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Well, welcome to our oecumenes!.. :--)

03.10.2012 22:38, Lev Bely:


The first IMAX 3D film 'Flight of the Butterflies' about the annual monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) migration recently premiered at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History in Washington, US.
The premiere gathered 400 guests including Mexico's President Felipe Calderon and government officials, the Mexico Tourism Board and the Mexican Embassy delegates.
The film reveals the story of a unique research of monarch butterflies that has been led by a scientist Fred Urquhart for the last 40 years, to discover where monarch butterflies go to spend winter and where exactly in Mexico they overwinter. Every year monarch butterflies in hundreds of millions take off from Canada and fly south through America to Mexico, where they reach 3000-meter height in the Sierra Madre mountains to finish their great trip. Urquhart was also the first who invented monarch butterfly tagging to trace their complete migration route.
Felipe Calderon, who is native to Morelia, the capital of Michoacan state, spent his childhood near the butterfly sanctuaries. “We must remain committed to the conservation of these fragile creatures and their threatened habitats,” Calderon said.
In 2008 UNESCO recognized the Mexican monarch butterfly sanctuary as a World Heritage site.
The Mexican government and leading conservation organizations keep butterfly protection and butterfly sanctuaries getting better.
Juan Rafael Elvira Quesada, Mexico’s secretary of environment and natural resources, thinks the film is “a brilliant example of Mexico’s commitment to sustainability.” “While there is more for us to do, our credentials in the industry are strong and, for this, we are immensely proud,” says Quesada.
The 'Flight of the Butterflies' released October 1st, and the next months it can be seen in many cinemas in America and Mexico. During the year the film will be also released in Canada and other countries. This is about the IMAX 3D movie specifics: the release dates may fluctuate over months or even years.
The film was produced by a Canadian film and TV company SK Films and supported by the National Science Foundation. The sponsors are Mexico’s federal Ministry of Tourism, the Mexico Tourism Board, the state of Michoacan and the state of Mexico, governmental and international environmental institutions.
Travel Weekly, http://www.travelweekly.com
Photo: a monarch butterfly swarm in Mexico, farflungphotos, http://flickrfanstan.wordpress.com
'Flight of the Butterflies' film ad

01.10.2012 17:39, Lev Bely:


On October, 8th at 18:00 the North Indian River County Library in Sebastian, Florida (US), hosts a Pelican Island Audubon Society meeting 'Florida’s Endangered Butterflies: Agency Actions and In-Actions', to discuss how the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission manage local natural resources.
The Schaus' Swallowtail butterfly (Papilio aristodemus) was among the first insect species put on the list by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in the early 1970 accorded to the Endangered Species Act. Since then, this unique butterfly despite its alarming status has not been re-established and, moreover, is now likely to be extinct.
Lately the list has been updated with a gossamer-winged butterfly, Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri subspecies (see Lepidoptera.pro 20.03.12 article), and three more gossamer-winged of Southern Florida. The Florida Leafwing (Anaea troglodyta), Bartram's Scrub-Hairstreak (Strymon acis) and Palatka Skipper (Euphyes pilatka) from the Florida Keys archipelago are also expected to be put on the list as endangered.
More than 18 other Florida butterfly species are threatened as well. Southern Florida fauna and particularly of the Florida Keys is much impaired. Three local butterfly species today are deemed extinguished. Two more vanished from the United States.
Despite the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission both have legal authority over these species, neither of them has initiated any serious actions to conserve or re-establish populations of the endangered species, and simply nothing has been done to protect many other species that are going to die out.
The meeting will also review how these agencies manage Florida natural resources and possible faults if there are any. How to unite the agencies, conservation groups, botanic gardens, zoos, and scientists? Concerns include such as monitoring populations of endangered species, artificial rearing of the most vulnerable species, and a research to see the reasons of the todays butterflies poor state.
It will be led by Ph.D. Marc Minno, which has been worked for 21 years as a wetland scientist for the St. Johns River Water Management District in Palatka, Florida. Now Minno is a Lead Ecologist for an environmental consulting and education firm Eco-Cognizant, Inc.
Marc Minno is the author and co-author of various scientific and popular articles about butterflies and moths, and also books of the local area.
Learn more of the Pelican Island Audubon Society programs and trips: call 772-567-3520 (office) or visit www.pelicanislandaudubon.org.
The meeting will take place on October, 8th at 6 p. m. at the North Indian River County Library, 1001 Sebastian Blvd. (CR 512), Sebastian. Free entrance.
TCPalm.com, http://www.tcpalm.com
Photo: 'Florida’s Endangered Butterflies: Agency Actions and In-Actions with Marc Minno' meeting ad, http://www.pelicanislandaudubon.org

30.09.2012 21:26, Peter Khramov:

Great, moved.

30.09.2012 21:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cymbalophora rivularis.

30.09.2012 16:10, Lev Bely:

Caterpillars also hang out, go to gigs and dance as all decent people. Say, to listen to Canadian brothers The Moffatts, which demonstrate how should a good caterpillar properly crawl. The sure thing!
The Moffatts, Caterpillar Crawl (The Moffatts, 1995)

29.09.2012 13:40, Lev Bely:

Butterflies are fairly nice and even wonderful, however shall we not forget that they all used to be caterpillars once, which were munching leaves, scaring kids, being scared themselves, hanging, crawling, stinging, snoozing and falling down, and even got some hypersensitive ladies passed out. An English band The Cure was not only busy with doing something of the kind, but made as well a song “The Caterpillar”.
The Cure, The Caterpillar (The Top, 1984)

29.09.2012 7:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acosmeryx.

28.09.2012 16:53, Lev Bely:


Every autumn when trees are ablaze with red, and early in the morning you can smell in the air the forthcoming winter, about billion of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) go off on a long trip of about 3500 km from America and Canada to warm and sunny central Mexico.
Since November and until mid-March 2013 a road tour company The Traveling Beetle organizes a butterfly-themed journey 'Chasing butterflies in colonial Mexico', during which you can watch thousands of monarch butterflies at the end of their fabulous migration.
This butterfly chase uses Volkswagen Beetle convertible cars made in Mexico. All cars are in good condition and ready for a road trip. Each group of tourists or an individual are provided with a certified English/Spanish speaking guide, and a mechanic to help when needed.
The journey starts off in Santiago de Queretaro, which is two and a half hours north of Mexico City, the capital of the country. From there “beetles” will gallop to the beautiful old colonial cities and towns. Accompanied or on their own, tourists visit San Miguel de Allende, Dolores Hidalgo and Guanajuato, then go further south to the Michoacán state to see its grand capital Morelia with the Cathedral and the Palacio Clavijero.
After such a cultural warm-up and learning more of Mexico, it's time to see the main sight — butterflies. Tourists dress up warm and go exploring mountains and pine forests in a largest Mexican El Rosario Monarch Butterfly Sanctuary, nearby a small mining town Angangueo.
The route of this 7 day beetle-journey covers about 800 kilometers, and tourists will see and learn lots of interesting on the way. This travel, which combines history and architecture as well as discovering Mexican culture and modern life of these amazing people, will be exciting to both wild nature lovers and city explorers.
The Traveling Beetle will book hotels and haciendas for all your stops. Tourists have a free hand to plan the schedule on their own, and again they can always get help from a remote team, which is ready to assist and answer any questions.
To sum it up, this 7 day beetle-run costs $1895 per person and includes a ride on a classic Beetle convertible, accommodation in finest hotels and haciendas, accompanying team of a guide and a mechanic, 24/7 roadside assistance, gas, tolls and automobile insurance. And an unforgettable encounter with marvelous monarch butterflies.
All tours from The Traveling Beetle: http://thetravelingbeetle.com
Luxury Travel Magazine, http://www.luxurytravelmagazine.com, The Traveling Beetle, http://thetravelingbeetle.com
Photo: a Traveling Beetle tour, http://thetravelingbeetle.com
A walk at the El Rosario Monarch Butterfly Sanctuary

28.09.2012 16:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved so far to S. cannigi, "uncertain".

28.09.2012 16:43, Peter Khramov:

So the author is the same as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13877.

28.09.2012 16:43, Peter Khramov:

The species added, image moved.

28.09.2012 16:41, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to D. belisama.

28.09.2012 16:40, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

28.09.2012 16:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.09.2012 16:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.09.2012 16:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

28.09.2012 16:38, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

28.09.2012 2:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.09.2012 2:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.09.2012 2:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.09.2012 2:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

28.09.2012 1:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved the "aged".

27.09.2012 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Other angles might help?

27.09.2012 22:07, Maxim Schwarz:

Macroglossum stellatarum.

27.09.2012 11:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Anthocharis genus female, I think.

26.09.2012 10:20, Sergei Kotov:

This is not at all Pontia edusa! Rather looks like Euchloe ausonia.

26.09.2012 10:16, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

26.09.2012 10:16, Sergei Kotov:

Rhizedra lutosa (Hubner, 1803).

26.09.2012 10:16, Sergei Kotov:

Rhizedra lutosa (Hubner, 1803).

26.09.2012 10:16, Sergei Kotov:

Rhizedra lutosa (Hubner, 1803).

26.09.2012 10:16, Sergei Kotov:

Rhizedra lutosa (Hubner, 1803).

25.09.2012 16:43, Alex Dumchus:

Eupanacra malayana.

24.09.2012 23:39, Peter Khramov:

Oh, right, Antiopa exactly. Just mistyped...

24.09.2012 23:32, Igor Sakhno:

Seems to be aged M. stellatarum.

24.09.2012 23:27, Igor Sakhno:

Antiopa.

24.09.2012 21:30, Alex Dumchus:

Moduza procris.

24.09.2012 21:29, Alex Dumchus:

Moduza procris.

24.09.2012 21:28, Alex Dumchus:

Delias belisama.

24.09.2012 21:27, Alex Dumchus:

Delias belisama.

24.09.2012 20:20, Sergei Kotov:

Catocala elocata.

24.09.2012 20:19, Sergei Kotov:

Catocala nupta.

24.09.2012 20:19, Sergei Kotov:

Catocala nupta.

24.09.2012 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.09.2012 19:17, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the notice, move it from Neurothaumasia ankerella "uncertain" to "undetermined".

23.09.2012 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

23.09.2012 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely not, even fairly another family.

23.09.2012 17:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved to S. thespis.

23.09.2012 16:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes so far to "uncertain".

23.09.2012 16:52, Peter Khramov:

Must be as well A. rumicis?

23.09.2012 16:50, Peter Khramov:

Guys, is it really that?

23.09.2012 14:00, Lev Bely:

La Mariposa is a song from an American trio The Powder Kegs based in Philadelphia, PA (US). They play indie, folk and pop rock music occasionally enlivened with a trombone section by Dylan Hume. This song, as well as their whole EP 'Empty Side', is perfect to listen to in such an overcast and chilly Sunday as it's today, along with some lazy doing like to sort out species or just simulate that.
The Powder Kegs, La Mariposa (Empty Side, 2010)

23.09.2012 0:40, Lev Bely:

Updated with BBC News video on how plants warn each other of danger. The embed code is sadly not available, so you may watch the video right on the BBC News website as it linked above.

22.09.2012 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, would you please specify it? Like the very species name that you don't see in Taxonomy but the search?..

22.09.2012 20:59, Alex Dumchus:

Petr, why can't I see all the Chilas photos when choosing Papilio in Taxonomy? Though can find them all using the search right in the up.

22.09.2012 20:07, Alex Dumchus:

Salassa thespis.

22.09.2012 19:26, Lev Bely:

Plain but really fascinating song 'Vicky's Butterfly' from a Belgian band The Tritones, which you can also hear in a rather adult Koen Mortier's film 'Ex Drummer' (2007). The film is quite kinky, and to assume this rubric was about movies, the 'Ex Drummer' gonna be restricted even higher than 16+, maybe 21+, whilst some adults would better opt to skip such stuff ever. Luckily, there's no need to restrict 'Vicky's Butterfly' in any way, just to listen to it for no matter how many times and enjoy consistently.
The Tritones, Vicky's Butterfly (Requiem for a Mermaid)

22.09.2012 0:12, Lev Bely:


While some of us spend workdays playing busy bees, a group of kids, namely 20, together with their parents next-to-last Thursday all went over the Oxbow Eco-Center what's in Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, Florida (US). There they were greeted by... angry bee inspectors? No, just the nice and kind members of the St. Lucie West Garden Club.
Junior Butterfly Club was founded conjointly by the Oxbow Eco-Center and the St. Lucie West Garden Club. The butterfly club welcomes all children older than 5, to gather at 1 p. m. the second Thursday of each month at the Oxbow Eco-Center. What are they supposed to do there? To learn butterflies and make projects helping to learn them, and also to create a butterfly garden at the very eco-center.
Hard to say what and where we'll be doing next months, but kids are pretty sure to be occupied with arranging the garden, doing crafts to place some artwork in the garden afterwards, and with tagging and releasing butterflies for them to make their way further onward, across the America and all over the world.
It's also planned to keep a journal and, behind schedule, to be open to any ideas and suggestions that are very welcome there.
“We sort of make it up as we go. We want the kids to come up with ideas, too,” said Sandy Bogan, Environmental Education and Outreach coordinator with the Oxbow Eco-Center.
Learn more of the Oxbow Eco-Center programs: http://www.stlucieco.gov/erd/oxbow.
TCPalm.com, http://www.tcpalm.com
Photo: a butterfly of Florida, The White Peacock (Anartia jatrophae)
The Oxbow Eco-Center on the Luna moth (Actias luna)

21.09.2012 16:41, Alex Dumchus:

I checked up Macroglossum of East Asia on the tpittaway.tripod.com where they almost all looked the same. So using the method of exclusion and also considering that my specimens have 46—58mm wingspan (one of them is especially small, just 34mm, might have been a "frequently sick child"), summarizing all that, this turns out to be Macroglossum pyrrhosticta, Butler 1875.

21.09.2012 16:25, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.09.2012 16:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.09.2012 10:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parantica aspasia.

21.09.2012 10:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parantica aspasia.

17.09.2012 22:07, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, updated.

17.09.2012 20:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

17.09.2012 20:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The white spots are not specific for that one. Look at http://www.babochka.umbura.com/userfiles/files/hypolimnus%20bolina.gif, kind of.

17.09.2012 19:56, Alex Dumchus:

Bolina? Where it has white spots on the hind wings?

17.09.2012 15:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.09.2012 15:02, Peter Khramov:

The species added, image moved.

17.09.2012 15:01, Peter Khramov:

The photo moved.

17.09.2012 15:01, Peter Khramov:

Added the species and moved the photo.

17.09.2012 14:59, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

17.09.2012 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

17.09.2012 14:58, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

17.09.2012 14:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:54, Peter Khramov:

All females in a row...

17.09.2012 14:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Zethera.

17.09.2012 14:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved to E. sylvester.

17.09.2012 14:52, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.09.2012 14:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:51, Peter Khramov:

Wow, the first photo. Moved.

17.09.2012 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.09.2012 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.09.2012 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.09.2012 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.09.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14481.

17.09.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14481.

17.09.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14481.

17.09.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

I missed that the author had already suggested the same I did. Moved.

17.09.2012 0:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cataclysme riguata.

17.09.2012 0:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea mulciber female.

17.09.2012 0:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tirumala hamata.

17.09.2012 0:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tirumala hamata.

17.09.2012 0:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zethera pimplea.

17.09.2012 0:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Idea???

17.09.2012 0:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypolimnas bolina.

17.09.2012 0:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypolimnas anomala.

17.09.2012 0:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea eunice male.

17.09.2012 0:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea eunice male.

17.09.2012 0:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parantica melaneus.

17.09.2012 0:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parantica melaneus.

17.09.2012 0:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea sylvester.

17.09.2012 0:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hestina nama.

17.09.2012 0:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea mulciber female.

17.09.2012 0:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea mulciber female.

16.09.2012 23:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

16.09.2012 23:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hestina nama.

16.09.2012 23:43, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.09.2012 23:43, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.09.2012 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leucania comma.

16.09.2012 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leucania comma.

16.09.2012 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leucania comma.

16.09.2012 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leucania comma.

16.09.2012 23:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cosmia trapezina.

16.09.2012 23:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cosmia trapezina.

16.09.2012 23:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cosmia trapezina.

16.09.2012 23:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cosmia trapezina.

16.09.2012 23:33, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

16.09.2012 15:08, Alex Dumchus:

Considering that this one is from Thailand, it's most probably Samia canningi, Hutton, 1860. Little bit later I'll add the male photo.

16.09.2012 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Pruners in danger!

16.09.2012 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Goes well. Would be better though with headphones or good loudspeakers...

16.09.2012 13:44, Lev Bely:

Anna Maria Sofia Cecilia Kalogeropoulou, or simply Maria Callas, known worldwide for her greatest soprano voice, excellently performed the aria of Cio-Cio San from the Puccini's opera “Madama Butterfly”. It sounds as powerful as tragical their life stories were — her own and the Cio-Cio San character.
Maria Callas, the aria of Cio-Cio San, “Madama Butterfly”

16.09.2012 9:09, Alex Dumchus:

Chilasa??

16.09.2012 9:08, Alex Dumchus:

Guess that it's some Papilionidae, Graphium or Chilasa.

15.09.2012 18:48, Lev Bely:

Guantanamo is curiously not only a butterfly hotspot, but also the birthplace of Leyanis Lopez and, later, of her song 'Como La Mariposa'. She has the sort of voice that prompts you to surrender immediately, and with no resistance. If there could be any, honestly?
Leyanis Lopez, Como La Mariposa (Como La Mariposa, 1998)

15.09.2012 14:34, Peter Khramov:

Isn't this Abraxas grossulariata?

15.09.2012 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I remove excess. There are still places phantom pain by combining with the blue base Site and fauna ...

14.09.2012 10:11, Lev Bely:


According to a new research, plants can “call for help” to spare themselves from the butterfly offspring as when the latter are just about to lay eggs.
It's found out that plants start evolving scents and other volatile chemicals as a so-called SOS signal for their neighbours to help them to dispose of pest. In this research the pest is a butterfly that is going to lay eggs on a plant, which tries to prevent it not to suffer further from voracious caterpillars.
The study* published in the open access peer-reviewed scientific journal PloS ONE, looked at the activity of parasitic wasps (Trichogramma brassicae and Cotesia glomerata), a fertilized Large White butterfly (Pieris brassicae), a fertilized Cabbage moth (Mamestra brassicae), and a black mustard plant (Brassica nigra) after it had evolved those specific chemicals. Insects were observed at the moment of the first butterfly “attack” on the plant that was the egg-laying.
Lead researcher Nina Fatouros of the Laboratory of Entomology of Wageningen University and the Netherlands Institute of Ecology, discovered that the egg-laying provoked structural changes in the black mustard plant and made it evolve a special chemical that attracted different parasitic wasps. They in turn attacked butterfly eggs or its caterpillars. Interesting that the chemical also repelled other fertilized butterflies that could either lay eggs on the plant.
The egg-laying of a cabbage moth, for which the black mustard was not the main host plant but just one among others, as against didn't provoke the plant to “call for help” — the chemicals it evolved neither attracted “defenders”, nor repelled pests, or in this case, butterflies.
Another study made at the University of Western Australia revealed that plants could “respond” to sounds and “talk” to each other using some special “clicks”. Researchers hung up in water young roots of corn seedlings and provided a continuous 220Hz noise that was a frequency equivalent to the plant “clicking”. The roots turned out to grow towards the source of the sound.
“Everyone knows that plants react to light, and scientists also know that plants use volatile chemicals to communicate with each other, for instance, when danger — such as a herbivore — approaches,” Dr. Monica Gagliano said in a university news release.
The later research revealed that plants of the cabbage family emitted methyl jasmonate gas when their external parts were cut or pierced, to warn neighbouring plants of danger, could it be caterpillars or pruning shears. Scientists found out that the plant neighbours, having got such SOS signal, emitted toxic chemicals out on the leaves to deter caterpillars. Or pruners.
*The study in full is available on the PloS ONE website: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0043607.
MedicalDaily.com, http://www.medicaldaily.com
Photo: P. brassicae caterpillar
BBC News on how plants warn each other of danger (no embedding available)http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-16916474

14.09.2012 0:46, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, thanks for the ID. The first photo of the species here.

13.09.2012 17:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Capua vulgana.

12.09.2012 18:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.09.2012 18:57, Peter Khramov:

To "identified successfully".

12.09.2012 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.09.2012 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.09.2012 18:55, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

12.09.2012 18:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.09.2012 18:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.09.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

12.09.2012 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

12.09.2012 14:14, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.09.2012 14:13, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.09.2012 14:13, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.09.2012 14:13, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.09.2012 14:12, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.09.2012 14:12, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

12.09.2012 14:09, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

11.09.2012 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Two pages for one species
http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/15022 and http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6641 rural Dipper.

11.09.2012 20:13, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, thanks for the approval.

11.09.2012 19:58, Lev Bely:

Jim des Rivières' 'Winged Tapestries: Moths at Large' travelling exhibition opens September 29th at the American Museum of Natural History, New York City, US, where it will last until September 29th 2013. Additional info is on the museum website http://www.amnh.org.

11.09.2012 19:41, Lev Bely:


Researchers from the Florida Museum of Natural History documented 51 butterfly species at the Guantanamo bay US naval base, Cuba. The local wildlife surprisingly turned to be rather rich and abundant with different species.
The naval base, which is spread over about 120 square kilometers in the southeast corner of Cuba, was leased to the US in 1903, and its territory is still not developed much. “Because it is a military base — and this is true for many military bases, which typically have large areas of land — people are not trampling, bulldozing or developing the land,” Roger Portell, the Florida Museum's invertebrate paleontology collections manager, said in a statement. “So there is a large area of land in the southeast corner of the island that has basically been untouched for 100 years.”
During a week expedition in January the researchers gathered 1100 specimens of 192 moth and 41 butterfly species. Among listed there are Fulvous Hairstreak butterfly (Electrostrymon angelia), an invasive swallowtail Common Lime butterfly (Papilio demoleus) that threatens citrus plants, and a subspecies Junonia evarete zonalis of the Nymphalidae family. Along with the butterflies collected in previous years, there are now documented 51 butterfly species in total around Guantanamo.
The authors of this research work, which was published September 5th in The Bulletin of the Allyn Museum (originally published by the Allyn Museum of Entomology in Sarasota, Fla.), said that their study could inform continuing investigations into the biodiversity of the region.
“Biodiversity studies are extremely important, because they give us clues about where things were and how they evolved over time so we can better understand what may happen in the future,” co-author Jacqueline Y. Miller, curator of Lepidoptera at the Florida Museum, said in a statement. “We're also looking at climate change over time, and butterflies are biological indicator species since they are associated with particular plants as caterpillars and often found in particular habitats.”
Butterfly populations are indeed respond immediately to the serious climate changes, as it was when the Rocky Mountains (US) butterflies were to die last spring because of the uncommonly early snowmelts, or ones in the Massachusetts, which some species left and moved north due to the weather got too hot.
LiveScience, http://www.livescience.com
Photo: Junonia evarete zonalis, Stephen Cresswell, http://www.americaninsects.net
Akito Kawahara, assistant professor and curator of Lepidoptera at the Florida Museum of Natural History, talks on his work and interest in lepidoptera

11.09.2012 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, you bet. :)

11.09.2012 15:45, Peter Khramov:

Isn't it Melitaea phoebe?

11.09.2012 14:51, Peter Khramov:

Such a mysterious critter figured.

10.09.2012 23:30, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, thanks for the comment. Moved to H. fasciaria.

10.09.2012 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.09.2012 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.09.2012 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.09.2012 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.09.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.09.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.09.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.09.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

10.09.2012 22:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.09.2012 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.09.2012 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.09.2012 18:13, Sergei Kotov:

This is not a specimen that faded out. This species just can be of two color forms, which are a green (most common) and a more rare pink-red that you can see on the photo.

10.09.2012 18:06, Sergei Kotov:

Lacanobia thalassina (Hufnagel, 1766).

10.09.2012 18:06, Sergei Kotov:

Lacanobia thalassina (Hufnagel, 1766).

10.09.2012 18:06, Sergei Kotov:

Lacanobia thalassina (Hufnagel, 1766).

10.09.2012 18:06, Sergei Kotov:

Lacanobia thalassina (Hufnagel, 1766).

10.09.2012 18:05, Sergei Kotov:

Lacanobia thalassina (Hufnagel, 1766).

10.09.2012 17:59, Sergei Kotov:

Eilema lurideolum (Zincken, 1817).

10.09.2012 17:58, Sergei Kotov:

Acronicta megacephala ([Schiffermuller], 1775).

10.09.2012 17:56, Sergei Kotov:

Apamea lateritia (Hufnagel, 1766).

10.09.2012 17:55, Sergei Kotov:

Aplocera plagiata (Linnaeus, 1758).

10.09.2012 17:54, Sergei Kotov:

Tethea or (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

10.09.2012 17:51, Sergei Kotov:

Clossiana selene ([Schiffermuller], 1775).

10.09.2012 17:48, Sergei Kotov:

Acronicta rumicis (Linnaeus, 1758).

10.09.2012 1:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is nothing to confuse with. Another similar species, Synaphe diffidalis, can't be around your hood. So don't doubt, this is the species variability. You've got neat butterfly shots, nice to identify. :)

09.09.2012 21:47, Svetlana Karaeva:

Thank you for help, dear Alexandr, though this very moth doesn't look quite similar to Synaphe moldavica. Or is it about the species variability?

09.09.2012 14:21, Lev Bely:

Another punk rock band, British also, chanting 'The Butterfly Song'.
Splodgenessabounds, The Butterfly Song (Two Little Boys, 1980)

08.09.2012 20:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

08.09.2012 20:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.09.2012 16:47, Lev Bely:

Once upon a time Malcolm McLaren presented to Britain a punk rock band Sex Pistols, and himself either performed rather provocative for England as he was especially well-known for being pretty progressive and innovative as to the music or art in general. Same was his 'Madame Butterfly' song based on the homonymous opera, arranged in his way with drum machines and atmospheric synthesizers. Why not, indeed?
Malcolm McLaren, Madame Butterfly (1984)

08.09.2012 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Synaphe moldavica.

08.09.2012 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Synaphe moldavica.

08.09.2012 14:51, Peter Khramov:

So what, guys, enough for moving to "identified successfully"?

08.09.2012 14:50, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr's comment moved from the guestbook to the species photo page.

07.09.2012 19:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Typical are the orange spots in those "squares" whilst the dark ones are not such a common thing. :)

07.09.2012 19:30, Nikita Chernov: This species is identified correctly.

07.09.2012 9:39, Alexsandr Martukov:

Why do the small orange squares on its hind wings lack typical dark spots (circles) as there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2329?

06.09.2012 22:30, Lev Bely:


One more butterfly hunting season is nearly over and it gradually turnes into home sessions with sorting the stuff, repairing nets and studying identification guides. But also this is the perfect time for visiting museums where the season is open all year round: to gaze for hours at bugs, compare specimens, count insect legs — namely, to make yourself ready for the next season hard work.
There is such a museum in Saint Petersburg (Russia), named Forest Zoology, Hunting and Entomology Museum, at the S. M. Kirov Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University.
The museum is located right in the main building of the university, where it occupies four exhibit halls at the forestry faculty. Its history goes back to 1859 when it started as a small study room for entomology students. The first insect collection included 1300 specimens, to see which in 1859 you should've had a long trip to Liissin Korppus village outside the city.
Forest and its pests are obviously the main themes there. Back in time to the Soviets, the museum was directed by Soviet entomologist M. N. Rimsky-Korsakov who arranged entomological expeditions over the whole Soviet Union. It wasn't recreation trips, rather comprehensive research work: in the post-war period abandoned forestries suffered from the pest invasion, and such expeditions were supposed to investigate lands and create new ways to reduce the pest population and protect forests.
Today the museum collection consists of about 5000 insect specimens. Eye on the same pests which seem to destroy whatever they find destroyable: leaves, tree bark as well as the very forest itself, which they can literally devour in the blink of an eye. So it's all about timber. Specimens are all properly systematized and marked: you can see there lovers, or rather, pests, of coniferous woods, then have a look at hardwoods and relative pests. While the third ones are definitely not going to leave timber ever, you may get entirely charmed with pests which ascetically refuse anything but fruits and seeds. So the forest in all its parts turns out to be the good food.
The museum states that its collection of forest pests is unique and there is no another of the kind in the whole world.
If you still hesitate which name sounds better, cockchafer or may-bug, or even billy witch, there you may probably sort the issue out by learning that it's also called melolontha. Yet the museum is rather concerned of the beetle itself which is a most dangerous pine pest. Albeit, it was successfully beaten, what the museum demonstrates from recently. Thrilling plot: cockchafer singed its wings because of its own weakness. Worth seeing with your own eyes!
There is also displayed some curious stuff like what pests leave behind, in case when they left anything. A tree trunk “decorated” by ornamental wood carvers — bark beetles.
The story of this wonderful museum might not be here if it hadn't a huge butterfly collection. Butterflies don't even need to ornate tree trunk or anything. They look so gorgeous themselves:)
Forest Zoology, Hunting and Entomology Museum: Institutsky side-street 5, Saint Petersburg, Russia. Free entrance, visits must be arranged in advance. Guided tours available.
S. M. Kirov Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University, http://ftacademy.ru, Museums in Russia, http://www.museum.ru
Photo: at the museum, http://ftacademy.ru

06.09.2012 22:21, Lev Bely:

Awesome sketch.

06.09.2012 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.09.2012 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.09.2012 21:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Macrothylacia rubi.

05.09.2012 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Macrothylacia rubi.

05.09.2012 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Macrothylacia rub.

05.09.2012 20:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Macrothylacia rub.

05.09.2012 19:26, Alex Dumchus:

To Olga Averyanova about Acherontia photo.. Yep, this one came inside a small parchment bag signed as it is. Not sure as for reddishness, but it has blue spots on hind wings which atropos lacks. Please, assist to sort out #14343, 14344, 14345 photos. You're from those lands, should be lots of Chilias there as it's with podalirius here.

04.09.2012 20:34, Olga Averyanova:

So I incidentally spotted this gorgeous, imo, artwork, a t-shirt pattern that can be used as a tattoo design. It's not that I like to damage my skin, just each person is on his/her own as well the very designs!!
http://shirt.woot.com/derby/entry/33752/acherontia-lachesis-iii

04.09.2012 2:23, Peter Khramov:

Thank corrected.

04.09.2012 1:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/13690
page sort photos of another species http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7467

03.09.2012 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Before today when you were uploading ZIP archives containing folders, not just set of files, the unzipping process could be erroneous so that you had to reupload photos in another archive or separately. Now it's fixed and the website can as well take in ZIP archives with files sorted into folders.

02.09.2012 16:10, Lev Bely:

Philippine (supposedly) band Tambok and the Papilion song, kind of those that stick in your head once heard. Tak ma bok bok!
Tambok, Papilion

01.09.2012 22:31, Lev Bely:


Federal inspectors in Halifax, Canada, search 2—3 ships a week checking for signs of invasive Asian gipsy moth (Lymantria dispar). This supposedly can do serious damage to Maritime forests.
The checking procedure may take place only at the Nova Scotia coast, hence those ships going to Saint John in Canadian province of New Brunswick, have to change their course.
Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) in Halifax reports that this year they searched by now 80 ships coming into Canadian waters after resting at ports in Japan, Korea, China and Russia, which are deemed as of a high-risk.
Inspection Manager Scott Bishop says that they recently boarded an LNG supertanker headed for Saint John. Tanker had to turn aside to Chebucto Head. “They were coming from Europe. So they would have been stopped before they came into the Bay of Fundy,” Bishop said.
The agency says it has found out an alarming number of egg nests on ships by the Pacific Coast. Meanwhile, the very coast still stays peaceful: no L. dispar moth nests found so far in the searching area.
Forestry researcher David Gray believes it would be a real disaster to have there Asian gipsy moth.
“Because the Asian strain has a much wider range of host range, which means it will feed on many more species than does the North American strain, it poses a concern to rural forests, to urban forests, to streetscapes, to nurseries, to orchards,” Gray said. “So it is a concern. We'd like to keep it out as long as possible.”
Four oil tankers going to New Brunswick were also searched amidst others this year.
CBC/Radio-Canada, http://cbc.radio-canada.ca
Photo: L. dispar moth
Lymantria dispar caterpillar

01.09.2012 14:53, Lev Bely:

Irish musical ensemble Celtic Woman and fiddler Máiréad Nesbitt performing “The Butterfly” (Celtic Woman, 2005).
Celtic Woman, The Butterfly

01.09.2012 14:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.09.2012 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aldania raddei.

01.09.2012 1:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yeah, now booted. Apparently, last night something did not work out.

01.09.2012 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Clip would be imperfect without a reaching hand.

01.09.2012 1:13, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. I did not see your pictures, and now they are really not. Yesterday was a transfer within the hosting site from one server to another, but it took quite a bit of time and I do not see any changes from the previous version in the database ... Try to experiment Download now one of the photons again.

31.08.2012 23:38, Lev Bely:

Yet it warms up cool: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuTmtqGXBb4

31.08.2012 22:51, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Peter, yesterday I uploaded a few pictures, and today trace their never see (in the "private office" they are not). I did something wrong, or have been failures on the site?

31.08.2012 19:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.08.2012 19:02, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

31.08.2012 17:09, Peter Khramov:

So is it common caja?

31.08.2012 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Evgeny, there are 4 species with Apatura schrenckii, I either forgot the metis that in Far East quite differs from the European one. Thus I refuse my previous version I offered so sure, it might be metis indeed. Any opinions more?

31.08.2012 11:17, Evgeny Slobodskoy:

Thank you for placing the image. As I'm not a real connossieur, naturally, I identified it wrongly. Thanks! Anyway, I would reckon that there are only two emperor species in Primor'ye, whilst it's in fact four of them. If I were more skilled, would probably shoot them all on sight :) Will be more attentive henceforth, though there sadly will be no chance but in a year :(

30.08.2012 17:04, Olga Averyanova:

Woow, what's a photo! You've got it high-arty.

30.08.2012 15:44, Olga Averyanova:

Might it have been atropos flew in? lachesis seems to have darker hindwings as well as reddish hue in the "chin" area of the skull pattern, doesn't it?

30.08.2012 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved those stray.

29.08.2012 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Right, Apatura ilia.

29.08.2012 21:52, Lev Bely:

Over 200,000 people visited “The Magic of Butterfly Reinvention at MGM” exhibition since its opening in May, The Macau Daily Times reports sourced from the gaming operator. There was presented a rarest gynandromorph swallowtail, the emergence rate of which is 1 in 6 million. Butterfly pavilion also provided excursions for many local communities and institutions including schools, kindergartens, educational centres, colleges, charity and community organizations. There is a photo contest “Waltzing with Butterflies” going along, with a new theme for each month.
A short look back at “The Magic of Butterfly Reinvention at MGM” exhibition: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUGaqRT3oTo&feature=player_detailpage#t=45s

29.08.2012 21:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

29.08.2012 21:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

29.08.2012 21:14, Lev Bely:


Cultivating pomegranate in India is a quite profitable business. In recent years this has been rapidly developing and being intensified with considerable irrigation entailed increase in pests.
One of the most harmful is a gossamer-winged Deudorix isocrates that's also called “fruit borer”. This “borer” causes massive damage and pomegranate crop losses on Indian fruit farms. What's worse, farmers suffer not only money loss, but fruit quality too.
Adult butterflies lay eggs in pomegranate flowers and fruits, their larvae grow inside fruits and eat them from the inside out. Caterpillars leave black excreta which can be noticed on injured pomegranates.
Fruit injury revealed at the age of 30—50 days, and within this very interval D. isocrates imagos lay eggs, usually preferring to oviposit in the calyx of a fruit.
4—5th instar caterpillars do the most harm to fruits, the latter are often being damaged as much as they can't be further utilized in any way.
Practically, this pest is really hard to struggle against since farmers are obligated to comply with the requirements for exporting fruits as to size, colour, blemishes, pesticide residue level.
However, there are a few techniques helping to reduce pest damage.

Physical barrier. Covering 30—50 day fruits with small-sized bags of butter-paper.
Immediate removing and eliminating injured fruits with holes in the skin bored by larvae.
Clipping off the calyx of a fruit right after pollination in order to prevent egg-laying and reduce overall loss. Additional 2 sprays of 3% neem oil will be also a good preventive treatment.
The most effective one is treatment of fruits with Emamectin benzoate 5 SG in the proportion 0.25 g/lit or Spinosad 45 SC proportioned as 0.20ml/lit. 2 sprays of one of those mixtures provide less damage and measurable pest prevention as well.

Information courtesy of D. N. Kambrekar, Asst prof, S. B. Kalaghatagi, Prof, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Bijapur, UAS, Dharwad.
The Hindu, http://www.thehindu.com
Photo: Deudorix isocrates butterfly, Surajit Koley, http://surajitkoley.blogspot.com
University of Agriculture Sciences, Raichur, on the struggle against D. isocrates (below another video, worse quality yet in English)

29.08.2012 21:08, Maxim Schwarz:

Photo's likely to get lost...

29.08.2012 20:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Sure, no doubt!

29.08.2012 20:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexandr is right! To be moved!

28.08.2012 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Daring! :-)

28.08.2012 20:58, Peter Khramov:

Move it to "uncertain" so far.

28.08.2012 18:45, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the tip, remove excess.

28.08.2012 18:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

28.08.2012 18:17, Peter Khramov:

The double fixed, species moved.

28.08.2012 13:54, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

28.08.2012 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Yet there is no connection to genera, but species, moved it to A. oculea "uncertain".

28.08.2012 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Believe Amphipoea oculea, close to...

28.08.2012 10:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Boloria improba twice hammered in

28.08.2012 2:47, Peter Khramov:

I'd say, sobjects!

28.08.2012 0:24, Lev Bely:

Why, the American police shoot objects with rulers:)

28.08.2012 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Splendid. Even better considering that was in 1973.

28.08.2012 0:16, Peter Khramov:

Oho. Moved.

27.08.2012 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mamestra brassicae.

27.08.2012 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Dear photographers! Suggest not to shoot objects with rulers close by, but comment the very photo with such info (body length or other).

27.08.2012 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved, thanks.

27.08.2012 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

27.08.2012 23:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agrotis segetum.

27.08.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Weee, resting they are fine!)

27.08.2012 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Lycia pomonaria "uncertain".

27.08.2012 23:08, Peter Khramov:

Ok, got it, I'm a dumb... So what's then, Lycia pomonaria "uncertain"?

27.08.2012 20:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not a double, it's a new message. :)
The first comment was erroneous, exactly I start rewriting that, changed its first part with 2 species to 3, but kept the ending. Since editing is off, had to write a new message.

27.08.2012 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, if it's not a secret, how did you manage to double your comment? There should be no doubles since it was updated...

27.08.2012 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lymantria monacha quite likely.

27.08.2012 19:05, Roman Ishin:

Cupido argiades.

27.08.2012 19:05, Roman Ishin:

Cupido argiades.

27.08.2012 19:04, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

27.08.2012 18:55, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

27.08.2012 18:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved to E. lutarella.

27.08.2012 18:55, Peter Khramov:

Larvee is moved.

27.08.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.08.2012 18:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

27.08.2012 18:37, Roman Ishin:

+1 Timandra comae.

27.08.2012 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eilema lutarella. Seems to be no any other.

27.08.2012 17:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Timandra comae.

27.08.2012 16:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Furcula bifida (Brahm, 1787).

27.08.2012 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Geometridae female, Lycia genus, there are 3 species in Tver' region amongst which just Lycia zonaria and Lycia pomonaria females are wingless. So I like more Lycia pomonaria.

26.08.2012 16:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Geometridae female, Lycia genus, there are 3 species in Tver' region amongst which just Lycia zonaria and Lycia pomonaria females are wingless. So I like more Lycia pomonaria, but it's not mentioned in region 8. :(

26.08.2012 15:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Clostera anastomosis.

26.08.2012 15:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Such a Xanthia icteritia.

26.08.2012 15:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

26.08.2012 15:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.08.2012 15:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.08.2012 15:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

26.08.2012 14:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily's right.

26.08.2012 13:08, Lev Bely:

Beside that this ace song “Butterfly” by an American comedian and songwriter Clarence Reid (Blowfly) will surely rock an entomologist's day as well as one of any other 'ist, it also mentions animals and by that gives us all infinite pleasure. What could be nicer than “Feeling more sexy than a pregnant toad!”? See the full lyrics on the song page on youtube.com.
Blowfly, Butterfly (Butterfly, 1973)

26.08.2012 5:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So do I think: not looks like one (pacta has pink abdomen commonly). Rather Catocala sponsa.

26.08.2012 5:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Chlorissa viridata.

26.08.2012 1:02, Masha Gill:

Euclidia mi. Identified by Vladimir Savchuk.

26.08.2012 0:57, Masha Gill:

Clostera anachoreta. Identified by photo by Vladimir Savchuk.

26.08.2012 0:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.08.2012 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved as the neighbour photo.

26.08.2012 0:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.08.2012 0:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.08.2012 22:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

athalia.

25.08.2012 22:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

eumedon.

25.08.2012 22:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

eumedon.

25.08.2012 20:50, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

25.08.2012 19:41, Masha Gill:

Phalera bucephala.

25.08.2012 19:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.08.2012 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Really pacta?

25.08.2012 19:07, Peter Khramov:

Ooo!

25.08.2012 19:06, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, photos uploaded, check the comments when you get online. Guys, photographers, I'd like to remind that you may comment your photos in the "Uploaded photos" section. Also, dried specimens are supposed to be presented single in one photo.

25.08.2012 13:10, Lev Bely:

Let's start the weekend with a song 'Poison Planet' by a Brazilian electronic band Blue Butterfly, playing cyberpunk, gothic, dark and industrial music.
Blue Butterfly, Poison Planet (Poison Planet, 2008)

24.08.2012 18:23, Peter Khramov:

No problem. If you've got time today, just put it in comments to the photos. If not, then I'll do it after they're posted.

24.08.2012 13:54, Alex Dumchus:

Petr, would you please do it yourself? I'm leaving tomorrow and will be back in the beginning of September.

24.08.2012 11:49, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, photos will be posted most probably tomorrow. P. S. Guess, would be reasonable to put the info you gave here to the shots itselves...

23.08.2012 20:34, Alex Dumchus:

Dear community. I uploaded 4 photos. The first one from above is probably Ch.paradoxa??? Since its wing cut-out looks much similar to other Chilias. Below is Euploea mulciber. Then I added its large photo and undersides, and Euploea undersides.

22.08.2012 21:03, Lev Bely:


This Saturday, August 25th, 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., Upper Schuylkill Valley Park in Royersford, Pennsylvania (US), hosts an annual butterfly celebration to come all the family.
Come here to know more about lepidoptera life cycle and plants they're attracted to. The special guest is a butterfly expert Rick Mikula who has been educating butterfly lovers for many years, kids and adults, and also writing books, among which is The Family Butterfly Book.
Mikula will start talking at 11 a.m. and show butterfly and moth species from all over the world, accompanying it with fun facts about butterflies.
Another celebration activity to take part in will be tagging and feeding monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). Children may join butterfly hands-on classes and craft to make something with their own hands and take it home.
If the weather's good, at 1:30 p.m. guests will release tagged monarch butterflies for them to fly farther south on their migration way.
Butterfly celebration welcomes all ages. The entrance is free, $4 suggested donation per person. Since it is an outdoor, the event will take place only in good weather.
If you're about to spend the whole day in the park, bring lunch to have a river shore picnic!
Upper Schuylkill Valley Park is located right across from Parkhouse, Montgomery County Geriatric Center, Royersford, Pennsylvania. Open all year round, save major holidays.
Beside the butterfly celebration, you may also visit a local exhibit Schuylkill Wilds and see animals living in Schuylkill River neighbourhood, with newcomer young wolves and deer.
Elephant hawks and ruby tigers at Westonbirt Arboretum’s annual Treefest, Gloucestershire (UK)
Westonbirt Arboretum’s annual Treefest, Gloucestershire (UK), that's opening tomorrow, offers a rich varied 3-day program including interesting exhibits, workshops, vivid stalls and musical performances. However, plus to this good line-up organisers have just announced something new, a series of special show and tell moth events lead by the RSPB (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds).
If you've never met such beauties as elephant hawk-moth (Deilephila elpenor) or ruby tiger (Phragmatobia fuliginosa), but always wished to, come see them at the Westonbirt Arboretum’s Treefest. August 25, 26 and 27 it will host a series of moth events where you can see those and know a little bit more of other wonderful moths.
Amy Martin from the RSPB speaking on the show: “We’ve been working with Butterfly Conservation to establish our day flying butterflies, but the nocturnal moths of Westonbirt remain an enigma… so we’ve drafted in the RSPB’s moth-expert, Dave Nevitt, with his harmless moth trap to find out more!”
RSPB invites all moth lovers to its shows and lectures that will start at 11:30 a.m. and 2 p.m. on Saturday, Sunday and Monday, August 26—28th. Locals are welcome to come by any time.
Children may create their own finger paint butterflies, and not just butterflies, but two newly discovered species recently found on the RSPB reserve in West Africa.
More about Westonbirt Arboretum’s Treefest: http://www.forestry.gov.uk/westonbirt.
The Times Herald, http://www.timesherald.com, SoGlos.com, http://www.soglos.com
Photo: The Maltese Ruby Tiger Moth, P. fuliginosa

21.08.2012 21:07, Masha Gill:

Cerura vinula.

21.08.2012 20:53, Peter Khramov:

I'll move it after I rank the issue with doubles of this species here.

21.08.2012 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.08.2012 20:51, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to "identified successfully".

21.08.2012 20:12, Andrey Lutikov:

The species identified correctly. In mid-July Large Tortoiseshell came out.

21.08.2012 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Deltote pygarga.

20.08.2012 4:07, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" so far.

19.08.2012 21:29, Masha Gill:

Ectropis crepuscularia?

19.08.2012 16:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Female.

19.08.2012 16:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cupido argiades.

19.08.2012 16:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cupido argiades.

19.08.2012 13:27, Lev Bely:

Today we've got another trio, also performing butterflies. Dmitry Kharatyan, Alexandr Zhiltsov and Nikolai Konstantinov singing “Butterflies” from the good movie Rozygrysh (Vladimir Menshov, 1976).
“Butterflies” from the movie Rozygrysh

19.08.2012 11:57, Lev Bely:

Whipped away from tests to Vladivostok.

19.08.2012 2:24, Peter Khramov:

The "samurai" might have been one of those...

19.08.2012 2:18, Peter Khramov:

Thitarodes variabilis synonym?

18.08.2012 17:53, Yuri Semejkin:

Korscheltellus variabilis, identified at FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

18.08.2012 17:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! It works. Everything's good!

18.08.2012 15:54, Lev Bely:

Italian band Papillon Swing Trio performs music from the movie Latcho drom (Tony Gatlif, 1993).
Papillon Swing Trio, Tchavolo Swing

18.08.2012 14:43, Peter Khramov:

It was some bugs, now fixed.

18.08.2012 14:43, Peter Khramov:

Yury, I caught that bug. Try now, should work well. Verify, please, that everything's good.

18.08.2012 9:50, Yuri Semejkin:

#13784 got of this caterpillar. So I enter this number, then press, but nothing changes. Thus I add it here.

17.08.2012 22:33, Lev Bely:


The Fukushima 2011 nuclear disaster caused abnormalities in butterfly species on site, reporting a group of Japanese researches.
“We conclude that artificial radionuclides from the Fukushima (No. 1) nuclear power plant caused physiological and genetic damage” in common Japanese butterfly species The Pale Grass Blue (Pseudozizeeria maha), according to an article published in Scientific Reports journal. Also said that radiation affected badly the species genes and mutations will be transferred to next generations.
“Sensitivity (to irradiation) varies between species, so research should be conducted on other animals,” said Joji Otaki, one of the researches and associate professor at the University of the Ryukyus in Okinawa.
“Humans are totally different from butterflies and they should be far more resistant to the health effects of radiation,” Otaki noted.
In May last year, two months after the Fukushima disaster occurred, researches gathered 121 P. maha imagos within the affected area and not far outside. 12 percent of the collected butterflies had unusually small underdeveloped wings. The offspring of the gathered butterflies had 18 percent of small wing butterflies, whilst some of them died before reaching the adult stage.
Among the butterflies of a second generation which mated with healthy butterflies of the same species, abnormal specimens increased to 34 percent.
In September last year researches gathered and studied 238 butterflies of this species, and concluded that the abnormality rate stuck at 28 percent. However, in the next generation got from the gathered butterflies, it raised to nearly 52 percent.
The researchers said that the butterflies collected in May were heavily exposed to radiation as larvae. The impact was apparently more severe in the second generation, as well as with the butterflies collected in September, because they suffered heavy exposure at a far earlier stage of a fertilized egg or reproduction cell, according to the team.
They also made a series of tests with P. maha larvae collected in Okinawa, one of the Japanese prefectures less affected by a nuclear disaster. Caterpillars that were artificially irradiated and fed on the foliage treated with radioactive materials, showed as adults the same abnormalities and at same percentage, as well as premature death, that the gosammer-winged butterflies gathered in the affected area.
The Japan Times, http://www.japantimes.co.jp
Photo: P. maha imago with underdeveloped wings, Inhabitat.com, http://inhabitat.com

17.08.2012 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

17.08.2012 19:37, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to C. lata.

17.08.2012 9:37, Masha Gill:

That was an error, this is Epione vespertaria.

17.08.2012 1:49, Peter Khramov:

Now works well?

16.08.2012 23:56, Yuri Semejkin:

Calyptra lata.
Identified at FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

15.08.2012 1:13, Peter Khramov:

In the "Uploaded images" or on the species photo page?

15.08.2012 0:45, Yuri Semejkin:

Can't see the "Add" button.

15.08.2012 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.08.2012 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

15.08.2012 0:27, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

15.08.2012 0:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

14.08.2012 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely not Polyommatus thersites, rather Polyommatus icarus.

14.08.2012 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is definitely not Polyommatus thersites, but rather Polyommatus icarus.

14.08.2012 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2012 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

14.08.2012 13:23, Lev Bely:

Norwegian band a-ha and Butterfly, Butterfly (The Last Hurrah), 2010.
a-ha, Butterfly, Butterfly (The Last Hurrah)

14.08.2012 13:11, Peter Khramov:

Before today the website search (up on the right) might have been rather malfunctioning as to species synonyms, in case when you entered not the full synonym, but its part, say, "archidamas" instead of "Papilio archidamas", or tried to search species by any part of its common name but the first, e. g. "tiger" instead of "yellow tiger (moth)". Now it's gonna work well in those cases too. However, please mind that when you copy/paste it, or enter rapidly the full name written vice versa, say, "tiger yellow", or in any other not usual way, no autosuggestions work out this time, whilst they do if you enter "yellow" or just "moth".

14.08.2012 2:47, Peter Khramov:

More! More!

14.08.2012 0:58, Maria Pozdnova:

Thanks, quite a solution. Works perfect.

13.08.2012 22:05, Svetlana Karaeva:

Thanks, Petr and Alexandr. So I was lucky then to spot two specimens of this, as I guess, they're rare.

13.08.2012 21:16, Peter Khramov:

So here's the feature done, or at least one of the ways. The solution: choose in the Catalogue wanted family (or a few, or any other taxon), check the box "Illustrated species only", then choose what you need from the 'Angle/type' list that has to offer larvae, imagos, dried imagos, undersides and so forth. By this, if some species lacks required angle/type photos (or no species undersides uploaded by now), photos of this will as well appear in search results by default (those images that will be shown when search isn't specified by these criteria).

13.08.2012 18:08, Peter Khramov:

Maria, now you can't do it anyway. Since "larva" parameter applied to photos, while "family" belongs to species. I'll think it over today, so if possible to realize it easy effort, I'll do it right today.

13.08.2012 17:56, Maria Pozdnova:

Guys, would you please tell how to search caterpillars by family only?

13.08.2012 17:49, Peter Khramov:

Now when uploading several images of the same specimen (upperside, underside, other parts as well as different stages such as imago, larva and so forth), you may link them in the "Uploaded images" section of your Member area (before they're posted), or on the species photo page (after posting).
Please mind that it's meant for to link photos of the same specimen, not species!
So let's say there are A, B and C photos of the same specimen. Here's the technique.
If the photos are already posted in the gallery, open one of the species photo page and write in the field "The number of another photo of the same specimen" the number of another image. Press "Add", then go on with the rest as before. In our case we should open A photo page, enter there the number of B photo first, next do the same with C photo. Thereby all three photos get linked, no need to link besides B and C images, if they're both already linked to A photo. So one month later we're to upload D photo that belongs to the same specimen that A/B/C, we just open any of the previous photo page (either A, B or C) and add there the number of D photo.
Other photos of the same specimen are shown in the right column above the "Other photos of the species" on the species photo page.
In case if the photos are uploaded, but not yet posted, open the "Uploaded images" of your Member area, then fill up the B and C photos fields "The number of another photo of the same specimen" with the number of A photo. You may herewith add at one time numbers of several photos, including those from different groups (namely, photos of different specimens), just try to do it right not to confuse things. The numbers of other photos of the same specimen are seen below the field "The number of another photo of the same specimen".
I'd like to ask photographers to spend some time to check your previously uploaded photos (see all of them in the Gallery where you easily sort them out by your name in the "Photographer" list) and link together images of the same specimens.
See how it could work: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13780.

13.08.2012 17:45, Nikita Chernov: This species is identified correctly.

13.08.2012 15:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Noctuidae, Amphipoea genus, species are not discerned by photo.

13.08.2012 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13780.

13.08.2012 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13780.

13.08.2012 14:19, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

13.08.2012 1:08, Peter Khramov:

Made more adequate display information about the geography of the pages plus species of bugs corrected with infoy (observed at ~ 750 species). I remind you that the data structure in the pages of description of the form as follows: first are compressed data, and then complete descriptions of the divisions indicating sources.Because sometimes it may seem that the same information is repeated twice.

12.08.2012 20:18, Lev Bely:

Butterflies were sung of quite a few times, and some pieces made fairly well. Loads of beautiful music all around, of which good share honours butterflies. The new website rubric tagged music will feature musicians and bands that named themselves, their songs or even their operas, after butterflies. No serious reviews and reflexions, just good well-done music.
The rubric opens with the “Butterfly” song (How I Go, 2011) by an American “Kenny Wayne Shepherd Band”.
Kenny Wayne Shepherd Band, Butterfly

12.08.2012 16:03, Lev Bely:

Dogs are known to be rather brainy. Seems not that much to beat the samurai resurrected of the dead (see part 6). So this Irish terrier fails to catch... an idea. Argh.

11.08.2012 21:01, Peter Khramov:

Just added the data to species descriptions. Now you can see more real info of species expansion in Russia.

11.08.2012 21:01, Peter Khramov:

Now, on the description page of each type of an explicit distribution of the regions in accordance with the blue et al., 2008. Previously, these data are used only in the selection of the parameters in the catalog.
Also, begin to develop the bibliography for each species.While such lists in most cases will be incomplete, but Down and Out the trouble started.

11.08.2012 20:59, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, do you agree?

11.08.2012 19:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pheosia tremula.

11.08.2012 19:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pheosia tremula.

11.08.2012 19:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

11.08.2012 19:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

11.08.2012 18:36, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.08.2012 18:35, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.08.2012 16:15, Peter Khramov:

Maria, now descriptions of Russian species are sourced from European references, which tend to err quite often. I'll soon reprint here some info of Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, that is more reliable on the subject. Some of those data already used in our catalogue (Russian regions selection), yet not for species descriptions.

11.08.2012 15:50, Maria Pozdnova:

What's about that there is no Russia in the species description? Neither it's included, nor excluded.

11.08.2012 15:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.08.2012 15:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tethea ocularis.

11.08.2012 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Ripped off )

11.08.2012 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Now could be moved to Chionarctia nivea. Probably, not all the photos should be shown for not to disinform about how the species does look like :)

11.08.2012 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14197.

11.08.2012 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14197.

11.08.2012 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14197.

11.08.2012 14:56, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

11.08.2012 14:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Chionarctia nivea.

11.08.2012 14:55, Peter Khramov:

Right, moved.

11.08.2012 14:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

11.08.2012 14:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. bilineata.

11.08.2012 14:54, Peter Khramov:

Phew. This one has "wool". Moved.

11.08.2012 14:50, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

11.08.2012 14:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Haemerosia vassilininei.

11.08.2012 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Super! Haemerosia vassilininei.

11.08.2012 14:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Heliothela wulfeniana.

11.08.2012 14:31, Peter Khramov:

The "wool" on wing edges is white here, whilst A. stigmosalis, I guess, does not have such...

11.08.2012 14:30, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain" so far.

11.08.2012 14:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.08.2012 14:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

11.08.2012 14:29, Peter Khramov:

Published Yury's additional shots.

11.08.2012 13:55, Maria Pozdnova:

Amaurophanes stigmosalis, maybe? Has alike light spots on upper wings... Sadly, just this angle shot.

11.08.2012 13:13, Maria Pozdnova:

Seems the leaf of an aspen tree.

11.08.2012 13:12, Maria Pozdnova:

I met on aspen poplar kitten (Furcula bifida), looks like one according to K. Lampert, 2003, which describes yellow-green caterpillar with a purple nape spot with yellow fringe, rhombic spot on the back with a dark mid line... Differs from sallow kitten (Furcula furcula) with white line breaking the nape spot.

11.08.2012 0:55, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Probably, didyma.

11.08.2012 0:54, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M. didyma.

11.08.2012 0:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. virgaureae, fm.

10.08.2012 23:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Yes.

10.08.2012 12:54, Peter Khramov:

By the way, guys, in cases when you know not the very species, but its genus or any other supraspecific taxon, please comment it so as the photos would be linked not only with species, but other taxa as well, both subspecific and supraspecific. This will be featured soon.

10.08.2012 12:53, Peter Khramov:

Great!

10.08.2012 12:52, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the approval, photo goes to L. pastinum.

10.08.2012 12:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.08.2012 12:52, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.08.2012 12:51, Peter Khramov:

Yury, are there other angles (even not technically good)?

10.08.2012 9:28, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

10.08.2012 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

10.08.2012 9:27, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

10.08.2012 9:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coleophoridae.

10.08.2012 9:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

If no any other angles, then "pokemon" :)

10.08.2012 9:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rhigognostis incarnatella, questionable. :)

10.08.2012 2:04, Peter Khramov:

Enough for "uncertain"?

10.08.2012 0:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Arctiidae, Chionarctia nivea to name.

09.08.2012 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Right one. And people came in masses to see it... 4 times more than to neighbour photos.

09.08.2012 21:24, Lev Bely:

Knight-samurai.

09.08.2012 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

09.08.2012 19:33, Peter Khramov:

The second photo of the species over here. Moved.

09.08.2012 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

09.08.2012 19:32, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

09.08.2012 19:32, Peter Khramov:

Whew, that's alot.

09.08.2012 19:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.08.2012 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved to monacha.

09.08.2012 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.08.2012 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

09.08.2012 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.08.2012 17:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rhyacionia pinicolana.

09.08.2012 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Plodia interpunctella.

09.08.2012 17:45, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

09.08.2012 17:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coscinia cribraria.

09.08.2012 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lymantria monacha female.

09.08.2012 17:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lymantria monacha.

09.08.2012 17:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lymantria monacha male.

09.08.2012 17:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lymantria monacha male.

09.08.2012 17:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lymantria monacha female.

09.08.2012 17:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agapeta zoegana.

09.08.2012 16:01, Lev Bely:


Biologist, tropical greenhouse
Fitness House Group of Companies (Russia, Saint Petersburg) has an opening for a biologist to keep a tropical greenhouse. Duties include care for greenhouse butterflies and plants, leading excursions for visitors, maintaining the microclimate.
The position is offered to Saint Petersburg residents only. Full- or part-time (as agreed) 11 am — 8 pm 5-day work week, days off include Monday plus another day to choose. Please, note that the greenhouse temperatures and humidity are pretty high. Location: 13 Sheremetyevskaya str., Saint Petersburg (Russia).
Application letter should describe your skills of tropical butterfly care and rearing, and how you satisfy this kind of job.
Apply for the vacancy on http://hh.ru/vacancy/5333249.
Forest Entomologist, New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited (Scion), New Zealand
New Zealand Forest Research Institute Limited (Scion) has an opening for a Forest Entomologist.
We are seeking an experienced Forest Entomologist to be part of the Forest Protection Teamwhich comprises over 30 entomologists, pathologists, botanists, pest management and fire researchers.The Team’s purpose is to protect New Zealand’s trees, forests, and forest products trade from insects, pathogens, weeds, and fire in perpetuity. The broad objectives of the research programme are exclusion of pests not present in New Zealand, reducing impact of pests that are present, and protection of the resource and markets.
We are looking for a Forest Entomologist with expertise in forest ecology and traditional forest entomology and who has the background and experience to design and establish complex field and laboratory trials.
Our ideal candidate will have a PhD or equivalent degree in forest entomology or similar field coupled with at least 3—7 years research experience. An understanding of invasive species ecology and management and insect taxonomy is required. Knowledge of forest ecology and management is desirable, as are skills in insect rearing and biological control.
This is a full time permanent role, based in Rotorua. Contact: Marie Green, phone 073435874, marie.green@scionresearch.com, Rotorua, New Zealand.
Closing Date: 24 August 2012.
For further information and to apply online, please refer to www.scionresearch.com.
Université de Lausanne grants
Université de Lausanne (Switzerland, Lausanne) offers Master's grants to foreign students. Covered disciplines include anthropology, business, biology, geography, human sciences, natural sciences, arts, foreign languages, information systems, information technology, art history, history, communication, culturology, linguistics, literature, social sciences, philology, philosophy.
This year the university offers ten grants to prospective foreign students who would like to continue their education abroad. Grants cover education and some other expenses. The grant amount is CHF 1600 per month. Study period: September 15th — July 15th.
Applicants must have Bachelor's degree, or its equivalent, got in a foreign (non-Swiss) university.
Closing day to apply: December 15th 2012. Apply on the university website: http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/international/shared/Prospective_students/Masters_grants/UNIL_Masters_Grant_application_2012-13reader.pdf.
HeadHunter.ru, http://hh.ru, The Entomological Society of America (ESA), http://www.entsoc.org, Theory&Practice, http://theoryandpractice.ru
Photo: Coleophora alticolella caterpillar

09.08.2012 2:39, Peter Khramov:

In dogonku: work on the topic of color will be a little later, because now everything is adequate to make up a system of signatures of authorship to the descriptions and add a system of information / descriptions for the species. Schaub was not empty. And then, and for the color can be taken ...

08.08.2012 22:44, Peter Khramov:

MOVED.

08.08.2012 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Had such thought too...

08.08.2012 22:31, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the feature "color":
1. Let's not forget that in fact, this feature selection is necessary not only to determine the species. A and to look the list of species composition of the desired color.
2. In order to determine this thing is useful too. For example, I like it quite a life easier.
3. The glitches are, I agree.In part, they come from the original inferiority of this feature, and there's nothing you can do (no one there does not make use of this feature as a major). Partially - what it is not to WCC general indication of the types of bearing.In addition, there vsyaechkie discrepancies as actually mold - whether to use only the primary colors (for example, no more than two), or and additional too (for example C in c-album white - c the one hand, the area Wing of the color a little, on the other hand - a sign that much is evident).Accordingly, if the mold and core, and more, then you have the division and attributes, and properties (ie, not only the list of colors, but also separately Osnonye and separate additional colors). Plus underside / top is often radically different. Well, the most gimor - is there any spring / autumn form and the male / female.Who it is made with a bias in maximum - that is, in a sign of the combined primary and complementary colors, underside and the top of the wings, the males and females. Himself from time to time I think about it, how to do better. Probably, we should still divided on the severity of the color (basic / non-basic), underside and top and, possibly males than females.
IeI work there is over what, but even as it is now done - is better than nothing.
ZY For Eugene - in the above example, you is not so bad. Yes, there is "extra" with TZ human species, but it is for the above reasons.
ZYFor Dmitry - go to the directory and select only the colors (and in fact any person can also select a region and a steep pattsan also family sailboats) - white, red and black. Nothing else choose. Apollo there appears among only 30 species, and find it there is a snap. Visa ALL Dew Respect, even in the present realization it is not a sign.

08.08.2012 13:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I immediately said that this suspension. Specially planted wife of Apollo - never define it failed in color. It turns out that the function of the sample of "color" is not necessary (who hardly understands - it determines will not, who do not razbiraetsya- the desired result will not come)

08.08.2012 0:24, Maria Pozdnova:

If its body wasn't of a straw color, I'd say this is Euthrix potatoria, and floodplain meadow is a rather apt place.

08.08.2012 0:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pleuroptya ruralis.

07.08.2012 23:18, Lev Bely:

Well, except for the full life of Twitter, the site appeared the mark - a very convenient and useful thing. You can see them in the right hand side of the community, just under the block "Fresh blog", and, of course, at the end of the text on the page publication. This list shows only part of the label, randomized.Later, there is a separate page with a complete alphabetical list of labels. In the meantime you can have fun bit: ask a question such as, "When Comrade N is already load the underside?", Make a line in the list of labels and decisively to reload the page. List of tag changes in the eyes, and, meanwhile, may appear and underside, you never know.

Now you can generate your own streams to the thoughtful reading and bring them to your favorites, to keep track of new publications on the topic. For example, the page tag danger zone will all posts disturbing the blood and imagination, and the tag humor continue to keep up to date with our butterfly Santa Barbara" World Against butterflies. "The label new on the site , probably useful for everyone, as there are posts all important site updates and new features.

Use, friends, having fun, and stay away from dangerous areas :)

07.08.2012 21:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter and colleagues! I have often doubted how the site selection of "color." It just does not work! Or something change or detail (offers smart yet not). Here, as an example, you can see that the outputs site as a species with the same set of colors http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/15034 Such examples can be found mass. What to do? Question to all.I tried several times to be determined by the parameters suggested by the website. The result is not simply inadequate, but will not fit!

06.08.2012 1:31, Peter Khramov:

Now we've got tweet button in the upper right corner of the site.

05.08.2012 4:00, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

04.08.2012 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eudemis porphyrana.

04.08.2012 0:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, it's some Cnephasiini.

03.08.2012 21:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. gnoma.

03.08.2012 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.08.2012 21:50, Peter Khramov:

At least, genus is the same )

03.08.2012 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Well, it goes to.

03.08.2012 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.08.2012 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

03.08.2012 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.08.2012 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Whoa, such a rarity, turns out we've got only one photo of this here by today, which was besides from abroad. Moved.

03.08.2012 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved. Also, the black dot might be just smudge on a camera lens.

03.08.2012 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.08.2012 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

03.08.2012 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.08.2012 19:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

@Acleris forsskaleana.

03.08.2012 19:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris forsskaleana.

03.08.2012 19:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris forsskaleana.

03.08.2012 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris forsskaleana.

03.08.2012 19:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cosmia trapezina.

03.08.2012 19:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Heliothis viriplaca.

03.08.2012 19:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Epicallima formosella, erred to put a question mark instead of a comma in the previous comment, used English keyboard layout :)

03.08.2012 19:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Epicallima formosella? What's confusing is the black dot up the wing upperside, albeit, no other similar species in the area :)

03.08.2012 18:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris forsskaleana.

03.08.2012 18:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Catocala fulminea.

03.08.2012 18:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pheosia gnoma.

03.08.2012 18:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pheosia gnoma.

03.08.2012 18:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yep, the more, it's Pheosia gnoma.

03.08.2012 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Olga, please object if you reckon otherwise.

03.08.2012 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/12950.

03.08.2012 16:40, Peter Khramov:

Doleschallia bisaltide, Doleschallia bisaltide... Who should add the species, huh?) Moved.

03.08.2012 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Scary beast.

03.08.2012 12:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Doleschallia bisaltide.

03.08.2012 11:21, Olga Averyanova:

That's the same butterfly.

02.08.2012 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.08.2012 19:50, Peter Khramov:

P. S. Dmitry, is http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/12951 the same?

02.08.2012 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of Athyma asura "uncertain" to Athyma perius "uncertain".

02.08.2012 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

02.08.2012 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Seems that. Moved.

02.08.2012 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.08.2012 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.08.2012 19:07, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.08.2012 19:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.08.2012 14:56, Lev Bely:

A video from the Smithsonian Institution on how to wash and dry small and large insects of different species using fractionator. This might be useful for preparing insects caught in Malaise traps and pan traps. Subtitles added (the CC button).

01.08.2012 0:12, Maria Pozdnova:

Here it's absolute Cosmia trapezina.

31.07.2012 22:55, Peter Khramov:

There is another angle, http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/14037.

31.07.2012 22:25, Maria Pozdnova:

Probably, Enargia paleacea too.

31.07.2012 22:23, Maria Pozdnova:

Suppose, Enargia paleacea again.

31.07.2012 22:15, Maria Pozdnova:

Looks like the same Cosmia trapezina, much worn-out now.

31.07.2012 21:54, Maria Pozdnova:

The angle is not quite good to identify it sure, yet at first glance seems like Cosmia trapezina.

31.07.2012 16:52, Peter Khramov:

Probably, Pandemis too?

31.07.2012 16:51, Peter Khramov:

Anything Pandemis?

31.07.2012 15:52, Alex Dumchus:

Looks similar to Cechenena helops helops.

31.07.2012 15:47, Alex Dumchus:

Looks like Theretra tibetiana or Theretra clotho.

31.07.2012 15:33, Alex Dumchus:

Looks like Amplupterus mansoni takemukui.

31.07.2012 9:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Could the male be Hypolimnas misippus? Would be good to see its underside.

31.07.2012 0:07, Peter Khramov:

Jaws (1975).

30.07.2012 22:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Beneath is Hypolimnas bolina male.

30.07.2012 22:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypolimnas bolina no doubt.

30.07.2012 22:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm not good at these species, but seems to be Athyma perius.

30.07.2012 22:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Doleschallia bisaltide.

30.07.2012 22:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dercas gobrias.

30.07.2012 22:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xanthotaenia busiris.

30.07.2012 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eurema. To check with ID guides.

30.07.2012 22:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Underside needed.

30.07.2012 22:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Elymnias casiphone.

30.07.2012 22:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ariadne sp.

30.07.2012 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Yep, that was a temporary bug. Now it works well as the photo uploading itself.

30.07.2012 19:44, Alex Dumchus:

So it says "'File' field not filled".

30.07.2012 19:15, Lev Bely:


Those who do love to work in the garden or grow plants on a balcony, for to enjoy seasonally with a cheery, vivid greenery, sooner or later have to deal with some kind of a pest. The latter, as a rule, vexatiously damages the best and abundantly flowering plant.
Thus we're usually afraid of any insect on the spot and, having met one, start hurriedly elaborating war plans, not even considering that certain insects could turn out to be rather useful.
Caterpillars are of the special, serious attention. Vigorously munching on fresh greenery, they are able to “clean up” an entire row in half a day. Odd as it may seem, not all of them deserve to be eliminated. Some won't seriously harm your garden, instead, they can suit it well. So the thing is that to distinguish “enemies” from “friends” and to get to know how to control voracious eaters.
The caterpillar is commonly called an “eating” stage of a butterfly's life cycle, when what will eventually turn into butterfly/moth, now keeps chewing on green leaves and sprouts in order to rapidly get bigger and finally pupate. To get an imago stage, that is an adult butterfly/moth, it passes through few stages during its life — egg, larva/caterpillar and pupa.
Anyway, let's go back to our garden and take a look, for instance, at the beautiful White-lined sphinx moth (Hyles lineata), which is often mistaken for a hummingbird. When feeding, it hovers over a flower quickly flapping its wings, rolls out its long proboscis and puts it into the nectarines. H. lineata caterpillars are quite large, they could reach as adult nearly 8cm in length; usually green, but rarely black can be also met. White-lined sphinx caterpillars, as well as ones of other species, surely, feed on leaves. Yet they so rarely happen to appear in as such numbers as to be really devastating to plants. So is it really every single of them worth eliminating?
Sterile garden seems to be kind of deviance. As caterpillar rises its head up, we immediately rush spraying whatsoever alive. To evaluate if your garden does need serious treatment, first of all it's advised to identify caterpillars with some identification guide such as www.butterfliesandmoths.org/identification_tools, or any other of the kind.
Now look at them and your plants. Do they harm that much? If not, let them alone, what actually won't last long since soon they'll pupate and cause no damage more. Seems that they're keen on eating your tomato-winner of the last Tomato Games? Just move them carefully to a less valuable plant and make sure that they feed on it.
In case when caterpillars badly damage your crops or deform ornamental plants, there are at least two non-chemical methods to use. The soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensi, or BT, is toxic to caterpillars whilst safe for most other insects, animals and humans. Note that BT concentrate will kill all the caterpillars in your garden including those which do not cause measurable damage. The second method could go well when you want to remove only most voracious guests. Take caterpillars off the plant and put them into a bucket with a soapy water. Thus you'll make sure “enemies” are off while “friends” peacefully munching somewhere aside and so happy with that.
Alexandria Echo Press, http://www.echopress.com
Photo: Elephant Hawk-moth (Deilephila elpenor) caterpillar
Naturalist Bill Howell on H. lineata caterpillars (subtitles added, the CC button)

30.07.2012 1:38, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

30.07.2012 1:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.07.2012 1:38, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

30.07.2012 0:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus.

30.07.2012 0:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus.

30.07.2012 0:51, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus.

28.07.2012 21:42, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to "uncertain" so far.

28.07.2012 20:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Perhaps, Crambus pascuellus.

28.07.2012 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.07.2012 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

28.07.2012 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.07.2012 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Some Crambus, I'll try to check it out.

28.07.2012 20:49, Peter Khramov:

Thought they are everywhere...

28.07.2012 20:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Error, this is another Pyralidae.

28.07.2012 20:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Right:).
All the rest occur to spot Amphipyra pyramidea whilst berbera is a rare thing.

28.07.2012 19:59, Svetlana Karaeva:

I'm sorry, it's an approximate body length. Also, thanks for the assistance with identification.

28.07.2012 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Reasons to congratulate? Not usual to meet in big cities?)

28.07.2012 18:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Amphipyra berbera.

28.07.2012 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Amphipyra berbera.

28.07.2012 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Amphipyra berbera.

28.07.2012 18:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Congratulations, this is Amphipyra berbera.

28.07.2012 14:45, Peter Khramov:

Red-eye effect.

28.07.2012 2:04, Peter Khramov:

While he is lecturing himself, yet simplified form. Now, there is generally one main field where you want to throw just a short (one word), a taxon name, author and year. Now copy-paste and the hands to enter taxa become even more convenient.

27.07.2012 1:15, Peter Khramov:

Paz. If only one thread Vidic who threw. For fun.

26.07.2012 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

What it is 1 cm? The wingspan size, one wing or the body? :) It's not about sizes anyway. According to Noctuidae Europaeae, vol. 13, there are two Chelis species in the North Caucasus — maculosa honesta and cecilia cecilia, the latter has usually more active black pattern on its hindwings. I'd doubt the accuracy of identification even as the moth was spread.

26.07.2012 20:33, Svetlana Karaeva:

The moth is about 1cm.

26.07.2012 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Dmitry, also please check out the undersides uploaded lately...

26.07.2012 9:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'd like to see this critter upperside (parides females are true hell of a mess though). Not totally sure of that this is neophilus.

26.07.2012 9:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Considering that this is Hypolimnas female, there are such species of this genus in Java island:
Hypolimnas anomala
Hypolimnas antilope
Hypolimnas bolina
Hypolimnas misippus.
So no one seems to be similar to this one but Hypolimnas bolina, and, to take into account that females of this species can quite vary, I'm 100% sure, this is bolina.

25.07.2012 22:23, Peter Khramov:

America is ahead of the rest, again.

25.07.2012 21:57, Lev Bely:


This Saturday, July 28th, Prairie Wetlands Learning Center arranges a short learning class named Moths at Midnight. This will take place in Minnesota (US), near Fergus Falls, from 10 to 11:30 p.m.
Apparently, moths are not as popular as their daylight antipodes — colorful butterflies: it usually takes patience to find an imperceptible moth out resting somewhere in the grass or on the textured bark of a tree where it can be scarcely noticed or even invisible at all, since many of them have perfect camouflage. There are about 12400 Lepidoptera species in North America, of which just 830 are butterfly species, and 11570 are moths. The latter can be amazingly various — from invisible to ones rich in colors, tiniest as mosquito to large as birdie. Prairie Wetlands Learning Center invites everyone to learn more about moths, to find, catch and study these beautiful insects together.
Teresa Jaskiewicz, environmental education specialist at the Prairie Wetlands Learning Center says: “This year the rest of the nation, actually it has gone worldwide, is finally celebrating moths by starting up a soon to be annual Moth Week July 23—29, 2012”.
Four years already PWLC has been offering educational moth-themed programs. “We want to study moths, not mosquitoes, so bring mosquito repellant,” Jaskiewicz said.
For more information, please call directly Teresa Jaskiewicz at 218-998-4486.
Prairie Wetlands Learning Center is part of the Fergus Falls Wetland Management District, which is in turn managed by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Moths at Midnight welcomes everyone, entrance is free.
Alexandria Echo Press, http://www.echopress.com
Photo: PWLC educational program, http://www.fws.gov/midwest/PWLC

25.07.2012 16:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. cecilia "uncertain".

25.07.2012 16:21, Peter Khramov:

The issue of the substitution synonyms with the very taxon names now fixed.

25.07.2012 16:10, Peter Khramov:

Few days ago the post was updated with photos.

25.07.2012 16:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Chelis cecilia, the identification questionable.

25.07.2012 15:59, Peter Khramov:

Right, uploaded them to the gallery.

25.07.2012 15:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.07.2012 15:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to G. agamedes.

25.07.2012 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

25.07.2012 15:52, Peter Khramov:

Added the species and moved the photo.

25.07.2012 15:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved, Argyreus hyperbius added as synonym to Argynnis hyperbius.

25.07.2012 15:46, Peter Khramov:

Species added, photo moved.

25.07.2012 15:45, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

25.07.2012 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.07.2012 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

25.07.2012 15:36, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

25.07.2012 15:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.07.2012 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Using exceptions, can suppose this is a Doloploca genus moth which is in two species in Primor'ye one of those I know, Doloploca praeviella, what's not to be this, then it should be Doloploca buraetica. :) Not certain identification.

25.07.2012 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identification is wrong, this is Ochlodes sylvanus.

24.07.2012 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to "identified successfully".

24.07.2012 19:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2012 16:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Some Cuculia?

24.07.2012 15:46, Lev Bely:


Tweed River Art Gallery (Murwillumbah, NSW, Australia) presents a new exhibition for insect lovers named Beauty and Nature: Art of the Scott sisters.
There you can see butterflies and moths, caterpillars and plants depicted in paintings and sketches made by two famous 19th century nature artists, Harriet and Helena Scott.
Susi Muddiman, director of the Tweed River Art Gallery, says that both sisters were talented and determined to make a difference. “They were also fortunate to have a father who was a trained artist and scientist himself,” Miss Muddiman said.
“He taught his daughters the techniques to paint nature, and also the scientific skills to observe, collect and record it.”
“This supportive background led them to a remarkable career in scientific illustrations — many of which are still used by scientists today.”
David Britton, Australian Museum entomology collection manager, says that Scott sisters' drawings are valuable scientific material as well. “The Scott sisters were among the first to illustrate the life histories and immature stages of Australian moths and butterflies,” Dr Britton said. “They were meticulous and understood the biology of their subjects in great detail.”
The exhibition shows selected watercolor paintings created in the period between 1846 and 1851 yy., for the prominent publication “Australian Lepidoptera and their Transformations”, written by sisters' father Alexander Walker Scott.
My Daily News, http://www.mydailynews.com.au, Tweed River Art Gallery, http://www.tweed.nsw.gov.au/ArtGallery
Photo: one of the Scott's drawings exhibited at the Beauty and Nature: Art of the Scott sisters, http://www.mydailynews.com.au
Australian Museum on the exhibition and item preparation

24.07.2012 15:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.07.2012 14:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dendrolimus superans.

24.07.2012 11:28, Alex Dumchus:

I've added all photos of undersides you asked for.

24.07.2012 11:27, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitry, you're right, this is Lysander, I erred to upload the wrong photo. Just added P. nephelus anyway.

24.07.2012 8:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nothing alike in Java island. This is African Graphium.

24.07.2012 8:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Now it's named Mimoides xeniades.

23.07.2012 22:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.07.2012 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Great. Yet no photos of this species have been here.

23.07.2012 22:15, Alex Dumchus:

I'll upload the underside in days.

23.07.2012 22:14, Alex Dumchus:

I'll add the underside near days.

23.07.2012 22:13, Alex Dumchus:

I've got a package signed "mixed butterflies", Mt. Argopuro, E-Java, and this butterfly was in the envelope signed "Java IS/". Sure, all these signs might be as trustful as any wrong ones... or it could be haphazardly packed in there?

23.07.2012 22:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Catocala agitatrix.

23.07.2012 22:09, Alex Dumchus:

Not sure as for Bolina due to that it's way larger than those Bolina I saw at the Phuket Butterfly Garden, from where I got a female, took it away from a gecko, so it was quite beat-up. I'll take a photo of their both undersides in days and add it here.

23.07.2012 22:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.07.2012 22:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.07.2012 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

23.07.2012 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

23.07.2012 19:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Tanaecia genus, need to see the underside.

23.07.2012 19:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cyrestis lutea.

23.07.2012 19:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia orithya female.

23.07.2012 19:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Argyreus hyperbius.

23.07.2012 19:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypolimnas bolina female.

23.07.2012 19:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parantica pseudomelaneus (Moore, 1883). Juicy thing.

23.07.2012 19:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is it from Java indeed??? This is African Graphium agamedes.

23.07.2012 19:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Acraea issoria.

23.07.2012 19:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parantica aspasia.

23.07.2012 19:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

23.07.2012 19:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suggest Parides lysander.

23.07.2012 19:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The underside needed.

23.07.2012 19:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Eurytides harmodius.

23.07.2012 19:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cyrestis maenalis.

23.07.2012 19:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Moduza procris, the underside needed to be 100% sure.

23.07.2012 19:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea tulliolus??? I'd like to see the underside.

23.07.2012 19:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea mulciber.

23.07.2012 19:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea radamanthus.

23.07.2012 19:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia orithya.

23.07.2012 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.07.2012 18:17, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

23.07.2012 18:15, Peter Khramov:

Some Junonia?

23.07.2012 18:11, Peter Khramov:

Common Oncocera semirubella?

23.07.2012 18:07, Peter Khramov:

Nice picture got there...

23.07.2012 8:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

23.07.2012 8:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea midamus.

23.07.2012 8:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea midamus.

21.07.2012 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13799.

21.07.2012 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Ok, Oleg, I've got it. Nice species, should say.

21.07.2012 12:40, Oleg Nikolsky:

I am, Oleg, the author of this photo. As for the species identification, I asked for the people from the Satyridae webforum http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t364536.html, where Hipparchia alcyone was supposed. All the images in a zipped folder 8_16-07-2012.zip belong to this very species (save the meadow brown, Maniola jurtina, which just comes along on one of the photo).

21.07.2012 10:16, Peter Khramov:

The species named.

21.07.2012 10:15, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.07.2012 10:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved to M. phoebe.

21.07.2012 10:15, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.07.2012 10:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.07.2012 2:07, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

21.07.2012 1:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

phoebe.

21.07.2012 1:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

phoebe.

21.07.2012 1:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

B. ino.

21.07.2012 1:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. dispar, female.

20.07.2012 21:18, Peter Khramov:

Oleg, are you hopefully the very author?)

20.07.2012 21:12, Oleg Nikolsky:

Hipparchia alcyone, from the author of these photos.

20.07.2012 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Way too sweet "face" to be one ;--)

20.07.2012 18:09, Lev Bely:

Freemason.

20.07.2012 14:27, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

20.07.2012 14:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, thanks!

20.07.2012 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Some bug during the moving. Fixed.

20.07.2012 13:02, Yuri Semejkin:

Why the species identification lost? If there were other suggestions, where are they?

19.07.2012 22:04, Olga Averyanova:

Will be the underside as soon as the light is:)

19.07.2012 15:31, Peter Khramov:

Yes to "to be moved"!

19.07.2012 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

To be moved to Euploea crameri.

19.07.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

19.07.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Now male then.

19.07.2012 14:41, Peter Khramov:

In the form of the addition of an optional field taxon - the original description. Iewe point to the source literature, take it from the generic combination of modern (and this field is required, kraynyak - at least in the form of personal messages), and in the first description - companion of Linnaeus and other similar indication with Paige, shapes, etc.

19.07.2012 14:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Strongly suspect Euploea midamus chloe (Guerin-Meneville,[1843]), waiting for the underside though.

19.07.2012 14:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Possible to see the underside?

19.07.2012 8:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male (in front) with a female.

19.07.2012 8:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

19.07.2012 2:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.07.2012 2:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.07.2012 1:52, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2012 1:52, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2012 1:46, Peter Khramov:

Tying a tie... Alright, scared, moving to "uncertain" ;--)

19.07.2012 0:32, Yuri Semejkin:

cf. means a close species, literally, which is near.

18.07.2012 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Marked it as "uncertain" so far.

18.07.2012 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Not here again...

18.07.2012 21:32, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved to "uncertain". So let it be identified by Dmitry for he was the first who suggested N. hylas.

18.07.2012 19:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved to ligea.

18.07.2012 19:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.07.2012 19:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.07.2012 19:00, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

18.07.2012 18:59, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

18.07.2012 18:58, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the approval, moved then.

18.07.2012 18:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

18.07.2012 18:53, Peter Khramov:

Is this a paphia too as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13790?

18.07.2012 18:53, Peter Khramov:

paphia?

18.07.2012 14:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, check this out, may help to make things clearer: http://www.animalsandearth.com/ru/photo/view/id/86565-looper-moth-inurois-fletcheri-pair-mating-japan/tag/Inurois%20fletcheri#/1/tags/Inurois+fletcheri/viewed.

18.07.2012 14:13, Yuri Semejkin:

Perhaps, it's just another thing. Not everything is on the web. I already experienced that, not only with butterflies, but flora too, when no internet search showed at least images, not even texts. Sure, you may find something in theme magazines which are usual to be in other languages. So today this is a rather specialized realm for professionals.

18.07.2012 11:38, Natalia Cherevko:

Erebia ligea? Seems to be that. Thanks!

18.07.2012 11:23, Natalia Cherevko:

Lasiommata maera female. Thank you!

18.07.2012 10:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lasiommata maera female (Linnaeus, 1758).

18.07.2012 10:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ortholepis betulae (Goeze, 1778) ??

18.07.2012 10:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eilema griseolum (Hubner, [1803]) ???

18.07.2012 1:31, Igor Sakhno:

Thanks! This is a best one of about 30 shots.

18.07.2012 1:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Neptis hylas, for example (what's a pretty common oriental species that this one looks very similar to). Sure, identification is uncertain. :)

18.07.2012 1:26, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. alceae no doubt. Male. Sitting as usual (it's kind of a resting pose they can stay in).

18.07.2012 1:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

That's it.

18.07.2012 1:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. maera.

17.07.2012 21:41, Maria Pozdnova:

Probably, Spilosoma lubricipeda.

17.07.2012 19:56, Alexander Birukov:

Caterpillars actually can be rather harmful, not too much though. Last year I've got a colony of large tortoiseshell caterpillars (Nymphalis polychloros L.) in a pear tree at my country house. They did eat completely a 50—60cm tree branch, so what? It's nothing for a 5m spreading tree. I convinced my wife not to take them away. In that very year a huge twiggy bough of approximately 2m length fell off the tree because of the abundant crop of pears that caused more damage than the caterpillars. My wife was impressed.
P. S. Meanwhile, in this year the caterpillar colony reappeared on the same pear tree and even on that very branch what they'd been before. Didn't they forget their motherland! :)

17.07.2012 17:50, Olga Averyanova:

The underside is #13781 photo, haven't got it spread yet, still being dried.

17.07.2012 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Yury, what does "cf" mean? No such in the linked list as well.

17.07.2012 15:01, Yuri Semejkin:

Hepialidae.

17.07.2012 14:48, Yuri Semejkin:

I have it named as Nemophora cf staudingerella (Christoph) as well as in this web list: http://bvi.rusf.ru/taksa/s0108/s0108598.htm, where it has the same name.

17.07.2012 12:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Olga! The spread underside photo needed. It's male, by the way. Better to have it prepared. Might appear to be something new.

17.07.2012 11:02, Olga Averyanova:

Seems to be male, considering descriptions, couldn't find upperside photos though. As for butterfly—ant symbiosis, might be in this case since I found it with a group of ants which I took away. Yesterday I spread it, such an amazing form, I'll upload it as it gets dried completely. Suspect though it might lose its blue color for it's gradually getting more purple.

17.07.2012 8:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arhopala centaurus nakula, male???

17.07.2012 2:55, Peter Khramov:

All three of them are seen as sharp as nearly their eyes. The moment caught quite well.

17.07.2012 2:54, Peter Khramov:

Yes, that's the beauty. Looking forward to see a daylight photo!

17.07.2012 2:54, Peter Khramov:

Appears to be ligea, doesn't it?

16.07.2012 15:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.07.2012 15:16, Peter Khramov:

The species added, shot moved.

16.07.2012 15:15, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

16.07.2012 15:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far. Would be great to get approval...

16.07.2012 15:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

16.07.2012 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far. Alexandr, would you please upload the underside photo?

16.07.2012 15:11, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

16.07.2012 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, enough for crameri "uncertain" or not?

16.07.2012 15:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 15:03, Peter Khramov:

The species added, shot moved.

16.07.2012 15:01, Peter Khramov:

As its hind wings were enlightened...

16.07.2012 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.07.2012 15:00, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

16.07.2012 14:58, Peter Khramov:

The species added, photo moved.

16.07.2012 14:55, Peter Khramov:

Summary: to leave it as it's now? Or what?

16.07.2012 14:54, Peter Khramov:

Thoughts?..

16.07.2012 14:53, Peter Khramov:

Guys, thing should get cleared up. Please, claim anything...

16.07.2012 14:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. melete "uncertain" so far. As for P. dulcinea, please approve or deny melete then.

16.07.2012 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.07.2012 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. comis and deleted that wrong comment about Lycaenidae.

16.07.2012 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Goes to C. albonitens "uncertain".

16.07.2012 14:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 14:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 14:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved to E. semipurpurella "uncertain". Correct, please, if needed.

16.07.2012 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.07.2012 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far.

16.07.2012 14:43, Peter Khramov:

Yury, the species is not named here properly. Please, check it up if I moved it right.

16.07.2012 14:40, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain" for ever?

16.07.2012 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Look at one more shot of it: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10184.

16.07.2012 14:39, Peter Khramov:

Anything new on this species?

16.07.2012 14:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. pisi "uncertain".

16.07.2012 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain". Please, do share your suggestions.

16.07.2012 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Yury, so do we move it to Yponomeuta evonymella?

16.07.2012 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 14:18, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

16.07.2012 14:18, Peter Khramov:

Any fresh thoughts on this photo?

16.07.2012 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain" by now.

16.07.2012 14:16, Peter Khramov:

Move it to "uncertain"?

16.07.2012 14:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9649.

16.07.2012 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9650.

16.07.2012 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Svetlana, so the "croco" finally emerged or not? The species name needed...

16.07.2012 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.07.2012 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved to X. albonotaria "uncertain". Other versions still welcomed.

16.07.2012 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Enough to move it to "uncertain"? Sitting rather odd.

16.07.2012 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Same question.

16.07.2012 14:09, Peter Khramov:

The same question as of the neighbouring photo.

16.07.2012 14:08, Peter Khramov:

To sinapis "uncertain" or not? Furthermore, there is no any juvernica in the website taxonomy. Thus the same Fauna has it neither...

16.07.2012 14:07, Peter Khramov:

One more species I can't consider where it's from. Or is it some synonym again?

16.07.2012 14:06, Peter Khramov:

To S. caricaria "uncertain". Svyatoslav, please approve or deny?

16.07.2012 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Zygaena lonicerae "uncertain" so far.

16.07.2012 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Any conclusion is needed.

16.07.2012 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Guys, what's on?

16.07.2012 14:01, Peter Khramov:

What's this species in fact? There should be its synonym on the website, supposedly, can't see it though.

16.07.2012 13:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 13:58, Peter Khramov:

So do we finally move it and where we actually do?

16.07.2012 13:58, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

16.07.2012 13:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.07.2012 13:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved to S. stimulea "uncertain".

16.07.2012 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 13:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

16.07.2012 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.07.2012 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.07.2012 13:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

16.07.2012 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Just moved.

16.07.2012 13:38, Peter Khramov:

Guys, could we already get it done, huh?..

16.07.2012 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Yury, what's the species anyway?

16.07.2012 13:34, Peter Khramov:

So to be moved to "uncertain" or "undetermined" so far?

16.07.2012 13:32, Peter Khramov:

Any versions more?

16.07.2012 13:32, Peter Khramov:

So what, not even anything "uncertain"?

16.07.2012 1:19, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

16.07.2012 0:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

didyma.

16.07.2012 0:10, Peter Khramov:

Lord, connected a new form of adding taxa to the site and Admin. Add now possible not only species, but also any supraspecific taxa. Parentheses are now handled a wide variety, including greatly distorted that before the blasted.Add algorithm remains the same - go to the page of the parent taxa (species for this is a subgenus or genus) and fill out the form below. Pay attention: the comma between the author and the year is required! Access to the admin area and the addition of new taxa are only those users that may be reading this topic.Therefore, there is no confirmation step - kind or another taxon is activated immediately after the addition. If you make a mistake where - write, I will correct.
Who will be the time - please treat the kinds of admin, and I will go in search of the old commentary, where the view of fote defined, but not affixed, as in the database at the time it was not.
ZYWho will be the types to add or to use admin panel - write in the subject or mail whether all works fine. I tested it, but you never know ...
UP: Not yet mastered the addition of species to the following pictures (under the cut once they are made reference to it was easier to pass).If anyone can bring them to the appropriate sources - do pliz (only fotam comments to leave, they say, the view is added).
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/7185
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/7236
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/7106
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6954
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5036
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/10739
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/11830
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/11850
http: // lepidoptera.ru / gallery / 11943
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/11944
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/11945
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/11953
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/12491
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/12496
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/13184

15.07.2012 22:21, Peter Khramov:

DUAL dogs can now enjoy all zaregalsya Find Topics Find Topics. If not mess and then leave ...

15.07.2012 22:12, Peter Khramov:

So if you mention the species name on the website and would like to see it either linked from its catalogue page if this very species actually has one, or in italics if there is no yet such species in the catalogue, please write its full Latin name within two pairs of "at" sign @ with no spaces, herewith Papilio machaon will appear as Papilio machaon, and some another species not yet catalogued will do as Species name.

15.07.2012 12:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.07.2012 8:17, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

14.07.2012 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Again, what the nice people they are...

14.07.2012 23:41, Peter Khramov:

S. pavonia too?

14.07.2012 13:33, Lev Bely:


Garden designer David Snow from Thousand Oaks, Southern California, US, insisted that monarch caterpillar (Danaus plexippus) would be removed from a pesticide label.
David Snow considered it wrong that the chemical company Ortho put the picture of this caterpillar on two products — Bug-B-Gon, and Flower, Fruit and Vegetable Insect Killer.
Hard to say why Ortho decided to illustrate the products with an image of the monarch butterfly, one of the most popular in America, to be presented as a harmful pest. In fact, monarch caterpillars feed on milkweed solely, not on anything else, all their three weeks of life, so apparently, they are not dangerous to garden plants.
David Snow noticed that pesticide label last winter and called right away to the Ortho's customer service to ask for the image would be changed. In the few following months Snow became a true headache for Ortho attacking them with complaints and stimulating people to defend the monarch butterfly which has been alarmingly reducing in number to be moreover a “pest star”. California's monarch population has fallen an estimated 80% over the last 15 years due to urbanization, drought, weed abatement programs and pesticides, said Scott Black, executive director of the nonprofit Xerces Society, a Portland, Ore.-based organization dedicated to conservation of invertebrates.
Snow's courtyard is full of milkweed in pots for his clients who are interested in raising monarch butterflies. That is additionally supported with T-shirts, coffee mugs, bumper stickers and fence signs asking if you already “Got Milkweed?”
However, three weeks ago Ortho did not show any signs of considering the case, then Snow put a petition on some website and started gathering signatures so as Ortho would admit the mistake and change the image of the monarch caterpillar to one of a real pest.
At the beginning of July Los Angeles Times asked for comment from Ortho and was answered that "everything about this case has been forwarded to our marketing team. We consider this a very, very serious matter." The very next day Ortho informed LA Times that they updated the label “to ensure there is no confusion with the monarch butterfly caterpillars.” Few minutes later David Snow got a message from a company official: “Hi there, David. I just want to let you know I followed up on your calls, and we're changing the labels. Thanks for letting us know about your concerns.”
The Los Angeles Times, http://www.latimes.com, The Republic, http://www.therepublic.com
Photo: monarch caterpillar D. plexippus, Gary Friedman, http://www.latimes.com
Raising D. Plexippus butterflies

14.07.2012 12:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.07.2012 12:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

14.07.2012 1:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

14.07.2012 1:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

semiargus.

14.07.2012 0:14, Olga Averyanova:

Would you please tell, what are they feeding on so vivaciously?

13.07.2012 22:16, Peter Khramov:

Nice to watch before bed.

13.07.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13700.

13.07.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13700.

13.07.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13700.

13.07.2012 22:13, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

13.07.2012 22:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.07.2012 20:28, Lev Bely:

On Friday the 13th evil shall triumph, so does it, and the hero is to die, alas. However, no one can win all the time, like in the previous part 5, if it's fair and square. This Australian emerald-spotted tree frog was quite fast and sure-handed, no any hope for the moth to be saved. Well, let's take our hats off and wish it to revive soon!

13.07.2012 18:22, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Macaria brunneata female (Thunberg, 1784).

13.07.2012 18:18, Tatyana Gordeeva:

That's it.

13.07.2012 16:18, Peter Khramov:

Nice guys.

13.07.2012 16:18, Peter Khramov:

Oleg, if it was actually identified, what's about the very name of the species?

12.07.2012 18:29, Olga Averyanova:

Sphingidae of the Eastern Palaearctic: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/china/china.htm.

12.07.2012 17:19, Alexey Semchenko:

Recent days I saw such one about 10—11 in the evening in Moscow region, Solnechnogorsky district, Andreevka village. It was flying over phloxes.

12.07.2012 14:36, Lev Bely:


So when it's the best time to slack off? Summer, obviously. The thing is that how to do it featly, even making some use of it. Butterfly walk might be the best activity of the kind.
Southborough Open Land Foundation arranges Butterfly Walk this Sunday, July 15th, in Southborough, MA (USA). This will be lead at the Elaine and Philip Beals Preserve by Barbara Volkle and her husband Stephen Moore, president of the Massachusetts Butterfly Club. The Butterfly Walk starts off at 11 a.m. on Main Street and Northborough road, where you can also park your car, and will last till 1 p.m. In case of rain, the walk will be cancelled. Follow updates on the SOLF website: http://www.solf.org.
Another Sunday event is the Butterfly Safari in Henry County, GA (USA), that's just 20 miles southeast of Atlanta. This 2-hour butterfly walk, from 2 p.m—4 p.m, will pass through Stockbridge and Panola Mountain State Park.
Butterfly Safari will be guided by an experienced ranger who will show certain feed plants of some butterfly species and tell about those who will arrive to feed on. At this time of the year you may see there buckeyes (Junonia coenia), the Eastern Tiger Swallowtail (Papilio glaucus) and skippers (Hesperiidae).
Location and the meeting place info is on the event web page: http://www.gastateparks.org/event/146998?locationid=11&c=4344660. The cost is $5 per person plus $5 parking per car. Don't forget your camera! Now who could call it slaking off?
Boston.com, http://www.boston.com, MyFoxAtlanta, http://www.myfoxatlanta.com
Photo: Silver-spotted Skipper, Hesperia comma
FOX 5 Atlanta on Butterfly Safari

11.07.2012 17:01, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Rather ochroid and creamy as the pages of your website.

10.07.2012 19:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Is that they could be either yellow?

10.07.2012 19:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.07.2012 17:59, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Hylaea fasciaria (Linnaeus, 1758).

10.07.2012 17:24, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Endromis versicolora (Linnaeus, 1758).

10.07.2012 16:28, Lev Bely:


Supposedly, the smallest moth in the world is now at Bohart Museum of Entomology, University of California, Davis. The other day senior museum scientist Steve Heydon was sorting insects collected during his expedition to the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2006, and he suddenly spotted a tiny moth of about 1mm length just as the dot size at the end of this paragraph.
Heydon says that this species is new, yet to be described. “We don’t even know what genus it is. We are guessing it is a Nepticulidae since this family contains the smallest moths. Their caterpillars are leafminers — they actually live between the top and bottom layers of a leaf, eating out the middle.”
“It has a wing span of 2 to 2.5mm,” Heydon said. “Insects that have a wing span of 3mm are considered tiny, but this one is really tiny — the smallest moth anyone ever seems to have found.” Heydon has been working in the museum since 1990 and handled with lots of wasps, flies, beetles and other insects of similar size, but never he met such a tiny moth.
Steve Heydon discovered the moth in April 2006 during the expedition to the village of Kikongo Mission, about 45 minutes by air eastward from Kinshasa, the capital of the Congo. He found it in the forest near a river in a Malaise trap, the kind of a micromesh “tent”, commonly used for catching wasps and flies.
“I’ve been sorting and mounting the specimens ever since (April 2006) and I’m almost finished,” Heydon said this week. So at the end of this work one of the specimens having inspected under microscope appeared to be “the world's smallest moth”. Along with it there were two more moths of the same species. “So I actually have three specimens of that moth.”
“I don’t know how he could have even seen that,” wondered Andrew Richards, Bohart Museum junior specialist, who took photos of the moth.
Moth expert Jerry Powell, emeritus professor at UC Berkeley and director emeritus of the Essig Museum of Entomology, supposes that it could belong to Stigmella genus, Nepticulidae family.
The African expedition was arranged not only for collecting insects which nonetheless enlarged the museum collection with 30000 specimens, but also conservation and educational purposes.
Moths which comprise estimately about 160000 species (what's 10 times more than butterflies) seem to beat butterflies once again, this time on the matter of size.
As for naming, this weeshy thing yet has no any, but is awaited to be named by some lepidopterist who will make its description, Heydon says. “We’re waiting for somebody to be interested in this tiny moth. Anyone willing to describe it can name it.”
Bohart Museum of Entomology directed by Lynn Kimsey, professor of entomology at UC Davis, owns a vast insect collection of over 7 million specimens, the seventh largest collection in North America. The museum also carries the California Insect Survey, a storehouse of the insect biodiversity. Bohart Museum of Entomology was founded in 1946 by remarkable entomologist Richard M. Bohart (1913—2007).
The museum is open Monday—Thursday, 9 a.m. to noon and 1 to 5 p.m. Free entrance.
UC Davis, http://entomology.ucdavis.edu
Photo: the smallest moth found in African forest, Andrew Richards, http://entomology.ucdavis.edu

10.07.2012 13:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved the photo. As for species descriptions, those which we've got now (save the catalogue search parameters) are pretty better than to have nothing. Actually, there was a form for adding new data with references that I'll make enabled soon. It was originally supposed to add distinctive features as parameters, though there can be some separate section for such content. What do you all think? Or might it get enabled first, then we'll see how it works to have a specific talk.

10.07.2012 12:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Good suggestion.

10.07.2012 11:56, Igor Sakhno:

Would be great to note always in the species description its main distinctive feature/s (1 or 2 at least) helping to discern it from similar species.

10.07.2012 10:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree with Evgeny.

10.07.2012 1:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

N. xanthomelas.

09.07.2012 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Now to "identified successfully".

09.07.2012 23:17, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

09.07.2012 21:34, Peter Khramov:

Yury, I put it to "uncertain" so far.

09.07.2012 17:24, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the correction, goes to Brenthis ino ward.

09.07.2012 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

09.07.2012 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

09.07.2012 0:47, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.07.2012 0:47, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.07.2012 0:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

B. ino.

09.07.2012 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Now you may search species in the Catalogue by families and any other taxon as well, beginning from genus and higher. In case if you choose both family and random taxon using auto-suggestions, the latter will be preferred as to the search results, whilst family ignored.
Hooray! Now Satyrinae that systematized on the website as a subfamily, can be chosen separately from Nymphalidae family.
Now the search parameters that were used are shown above the species search results.
Also fixed the issue with incorrect search by colors.

07.07.2012 10:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved to lathonia.

07.07.2012 10:20, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. glyphica.

07.07.2012 10:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.07.2012 10:19, Peter Khramov:

Whee, one more.

07.07.2012 10:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.07.2012 10:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. dispar.

07.07.2012 10:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Moscowites' favourite moth, Chrysoteuchia culmella.

06.07.2012 22:52, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there it is: http://lepidoptera.pro/catalog?regs[]=40&page=2&tax[]=106&photo=on. Moved it.

06.07.2012 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Yes, didn't move it promptly. Move it to C. culmella as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13562.

06.07.2012 22:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ptycholoma lecheana? if it's actually there, meh if not.

06.07.2012 22:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Isn't it Chrysoteuchia culmella, is it?

06.07.2012 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Siona lineata.

06.07.2012 21:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

As I see, this is Lycaena dispar female.

06.07.2012 21:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, don't be idle. :) Please, name its in full, Deilephila elpenor
:)

06.07.2012 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

06.07.2012 21:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not as that identified, this is Issoria lathonia.

06.07.2012 21:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

It's not.

06.07.2012 21:36, Peter Khramov:

Is this really it?

06.07.2012 21:34, Peter Khramov:

Straight hare.

06.07.2012 21:33, Peter Khramov:

Euclidia glyphica?

06.07.2012 21:33, Peter Khramov:

Swanky hairdo.

06.07.2012 21:31, Peter Khramov:

Elpenor?

06.07.2012 21:30, Peter Khramov:

Phlaeas?

06.07.2012 20:05, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I changed.

06.07.2012 17:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, on the page http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/88 family is representative of another family Єrebeid. it is necessary to fix :). And confused.

06.07.2012 17:22, Peter Khramov:

I moved all Satyrium synonyms in Nordmannia.

05.07.2012 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to I. aversata.

05.07.2012 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

05.07.2012 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13597.

05.07.2012 23:16, Peter Khramov:

I've just moved all four, it would be great though to make it possible to identify all at once if it's such a group. However, soon there will be a feature connecting photos of one species.

05.07.2012 21:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tatyana, there are three more images of this Geometridae, please, identify them either, otherwise they might stick since Petr may not associate them all together. :)

05.07.2012 21:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sergey, thanks, that's it. :)

05.07.2012 21:01, Sergey Novitckiy:

Perhaps, http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/index.html?

05.07.2012 19:50, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Idaea serpentata (Hufnagel, 1767).

05.07.2012 19:47, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Cabera pusaria (Linnaeus, 1758).

05.07.2012 18:19, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

05.07.2012 18:15, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Scopula (Scopula) rubiginata (Hufnagel, 1767).

05.07.2012 18:13, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Idaea aversata (Linnaeus, 1758).

05.07.2012 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

I lost the link to the website I need, can't find it. So it's similar to http://www.faunaeur.org/, just of a planet scale :) green pages, expansion maps are on the right. Nearly no illustrations, yet they're rarely met. Please, give a prompt. Thanks!

05.07.2012 1:30, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yes.

05.07.2012 1:10, Peter Khramov:

Did they multiply!

05.07.2012 1:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.07.2012 0:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Chrysoteuchia culmella, quite popular moth in Moscow :)

04.07.2012 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems to be.

04.07.2012 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Colostygia pectinataria.

04.07.2012 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Colostygia pectinataria.

04.07.2012 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Colostygia pectinataria.

04.07.2012 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.07.2012 23:50, Peter Khramov:

Yes, Vitaly happens to make mistakes at times. Moved the second one to "uncertain" as well...

04.07.2012 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Yes, this is the same specimen, or even species. I play with angles after the main ones are done :--)

04.07.2012 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2012 23:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is nothing to say just it could be Archips xylosteana as the neighbouring one. In case if these two moths were shot together :)

04.07.2012 23:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one is to Archips xylosteana either.

04.07.2012 23:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

I doubt actually the neighbouring either, the quality and identification both :(

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.07.2012 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

04.07.2012 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Got it, moved.

04.07.2012 23:30, Peter Khramov:

Same as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13588?

04.07.2012 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13588.

04.07.2012 23:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.07.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.07.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Yep, the photo looks quite different from the neighbouring...

04.07.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Ok, move it to "identified successfully".

04.07.2012 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Bad angle. Archips xylosteana.

04.07.2012 23:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

All caterpillars identified right. They change its color in time. :)

04.07.2012 23:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena dispar.

04.07.2012 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2012 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2012 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2012 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2012 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2012 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Archips podana.

04.07.2012 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cybosia mesomella.

04.07.2012 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Callimorpha dominula.

04.07.2012 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2012 22:43, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

04.07.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, you may upload new species using new forms in a few days, now it's off.

04.07.2012 22:10, Peter Khramov:

Polypogon tentacularia?

04.07.2012 22:09, Peter Khramov:

Chrysoteuchia culmella?

04.07.2012 22:08, Peter Khramov:

Rivula sericealis?

04.07.2012 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Micropterix aureatella?

04.07.2012 22:04, Peter Khramov:

If they do change that much while ageing? The neighbouring photos look different...

04.07.2012 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems to be Acharia nesea either.

04.07.2012 14:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Surfed the web, so stimule is in North America, hence this is Acharia nesea. Petr, I'll get the genus and species catalogued tonight.

04.07.2012 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Might be Acharia genus, Limacodidae family. As for the species, there are two candidates, nesea and stimule. Vote for the latter. Dmitry, did make me dig the thing out. :).

04.07.2012 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopygidae or of the kind.

04.07.2012 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What's family?

03.07.2012 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

As I see, it's not Hepialidae. There is a small family of such things, couldn't find the very species though. :)

03.07.2012 16:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Druceiella amazonensis?

03.07.2012 16:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Might be perchance Eriocrania semipurpurella (Stephens, 1835). ??

03.07.2012 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Boris now also offers Satyrium. In any case, here I want to confirm that I understand correctly, that all species from this page can be sent to the http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/13901 Satyrium (a synonym in Nordmann)?

03.07.2012 13:35, Peter Khramov:

A realized. At first I thought that some kind of wormed once, not photo / illustration. Now I corrected.

03.07.2012 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "undetermined".

03.07.2012 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "undetermined".

03.07.2012 12:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

And the kind of classification Protoschinia, the exact same picture scutosa

03.07.2012 12:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, when you look kind of classification is Schinia photo Protoschinia scutosa

03.07.2012 12:06, Andrey Ponomarev:

This one to be moved to "undetermined".

03.07.2012 12:01, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, then name at least its genus or any other upper taxon...

03.07.2012 11:12, Peter Khramov:

So there have only scutata and scutosa - here, alone, with the corresponding synonymous: http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7196

03.07.2012 11:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Protoschinia scutosa

03.07.2012 2:02, Peter Khramov:

Which is kind?

02.07.2012 23:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, see p. Http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/1392, there is kind of a view of a different kind. :) there is a view of the race of another kind.

02.07.2012 22:54, Irina Smirnova:

Unfortunately, no underside...

02.07.2012 22:20, Lev Bely:


The British company Oxitec “updated” diamondback moths (Plutella xylostella) by sterilizing males to reduce crop loss.
Oxitec researchers made genetically modified sterile males which are to mate with non-laboratory, “wild” females of the same species. Due to this modification, females of the next brood don't survive to adult stage.
The company press-release reads that this is just the first stage of the research. It will take few more trials to evaluate the project results and its efficiency.
Scott Meers, an entomologist from the Entomological Society of Alberta finds the work interesting, though he doesn’t know how it could be adapted across Canada’s vast canola acres.
“If it’s anything like other sterile male releases, it’s really, really expensive. It wouldn’t make sense on our extensive canola crops,” he said.
Sterile males are released at times in greenhouses or other closed spaces where they could be somehow observed, but not in fields.
Meers also doubts whether diamondback moths do cause enormous loss of Canadian canola crops. It's hard to count damages in advance since that depends on how many moths overwintered. Those who did are blown with strong south winds northward to Manitoba, Saskatchewan and eastern Alberta. When the weather's good and caterpillars are free to devour young foliage of canola and mustard, there can be million dollars losses. Opposite, wet and humid conditions restrain the activity of adult moths whilst rains drown small caterpillars.
Thereto, in Canada diamondback moths are bothered with parasitic wasps and farmers who use insecticides hampering moth reproduction.
Jim Broatch with Alberta Agriculture’s Pest management branch says that it's hard to tell if a release of sterile diamondback moths would be effective since most moths come with winds from the USA.
“When would you would release the males? I guess you could figure out in advance. I am not sure how successful it would be or how many you would need to release to impact the population,” said Broatch. “We don’t know how many are going to be blown up.”
The release of sterile coddling moth males (Cydia pomonella) on apple trees in Okanagan was successful, yet the territory was limited.
“It would be a tough one to figure out in how much to invest and how much you would benefit from it (in field crops),” said Broatch.
The Western Producer, http://www.producer.com
Photo: diamondback moth, P. xylostella
National Geographic on fight against diamondback moths

Scott Meers demonstrates how to set up a field moth trap

02.07.2012 22:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alas, might try to identify if there are more shots from different angles.

02.07.2012 21:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

02.07.2012 21:53, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

02.07.2012 21:53, Peter Khramov:

To "undetermined"?

02.07.2012 21:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Two similar photos, neither Spilonota ocellana, to delete the double.

02.07.2012 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spilonota ocellana.

02.07.2012 21:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spilonota ocellana.

02.07.2012 21:25, Peter Khramov:

Whoa, a new species.

02.07.2012 21:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to H. maritima.

02.07.2012 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Heliothis maritima.

02.07.2012 16:03, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Teia antiquiodes.

01.07.2012 19:56, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

01.07.2012 19:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.07.2012 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.07.2012 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

01.07.2012 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.07.2012 19:54, Peter Khramov:

Poor thing.

01.07.2012 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, goes to.

01.07.2012 19:26, Marija Jaunkunga:

This is #13541 and #13542 moth underside.

01.07.2012 19:13, Marija Jaunkunga:

Yes, that's #13544 moth underside.

01.07.2012 16:52, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

01.07.2012 16:52, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Macaria alternata (?) underside.

01.07.2012 16:48, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Macaria alternata, Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775.

01.07.2012 16:45, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Should be the same moth underside? Macaria notata (Linnaeus, 1758).

01.07.2012 16:44, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Macaria notata (Linnaeus, 1758).

01.07.2012 16:43, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Macaria notata (Linnaeus, 1758).

01.07.2012 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Endromis versicolora, not clear though what's with its wings, whether it hasn't already or yet.

01.07.2012 16:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Deltote pygarga.

01.07.2012 14:52, Peter Khramov:

Goes to C. craterella, "uncertain".

01.07.2012 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Dog wears cape.

01.07.2012 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Long, green, smells like a sausage.

01.07.2012 14:10, Svetlana Karaeva:

Might be Chrysocrambus craterella.

30.06.2012 14:10, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

30.06.2012 14:08, Peter Khramov:

Meh, pity. Moved.

30.06.2012 13:09, Peter Khramov:

Regarding Nordman even wait for an answer Boris Stradomsky, it just was initially against Satyrium ...

30.06.2012 8:18, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Not Entephria by any means! Colors, pattern, shape of lines, the discal spot, the pattern is quite fragmentized. This is a common Electrophaes corylata.

30.06.2012 1:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Female, by the way.

30.06.2012 1:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ambigua in Perm' region??? (Even not looks like...) Imho, this is diamina.

29.06.2012 17:20, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

29.06.2012 17:20, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, the photo goes to Boloria selene.

29.06.2012 16:07, Yuriy Karpov:

Melitaea (Mellicta) ambigua male.

29.06.2012 15:55, Yuriy Karpov:

This is a selene female.

28.06.2012 18:51, Peter Khramov:

Seems to be some bug happened during the species carry-over from Satyrium to Nordmannia. So this photo and the neighbouring are all Nordmannia eximius, right?

28.06.2012 17:56, Yuri Semejkin:

How come the species name was removed off from all photos of this species?

28.06.2012 0:04, Peter Khramov:

Perfect male!

27.06.2012 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Truncated. The blue finish. You can now use afigenskimi samples in the catalog by region. With Nordmann - now uzho tomorrow 8--)

27.06.2012 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Now you may choose in the catalogue species from Russian regions as well as of European. Such search may, of course, include other parameters, to see, say, all Geometridae of Sredne-Volzhsky region (Russia). Besides, you may select several regions at once, to combine them with AND or OR, for to see all species of all selected regions, or all species of just one of them. And yes, selection may even comprise species both presented in Karelia region and France :--) So there is nothing to limit selections, but your own will.
How to use: on the Catalogue page press "Region (Russia)" button in the Search parameters column, then choose region/s from the list. If you somehow doubt what lands and counties some region includes, press "Commentaries to regions of Russia" button below the list of regions, to see commentaries to each of them.
Regions are structured in accordance with the Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia (edited by S. Y. Sinev, 2008).
P. S. Also fixed the issue with the malfunctioned AND option as to the country selection, updated regions of Russia and also species and synonym databases corrected a bit.

27.06.2012 22:21, Lev Bely:


Bombs and other explosives leave around an invisible chemical trace. In airports and other common places these microparticles, which dangling in the air, are detected by security dogs which has a special, trained nose. Yet such dogs are rather expensive to hold and train, they get tired soon during their service, what's apparently unsafe since a weary dog may miss a bomb, sooner or later.
A new method of detecting the chemical dust of TNT (trinitrotoluene) or explosives of the kind came from other perfect sniffers, namely, silk moth males (Bombyx mori) and their gorgeous feathery antennae. The latter are in fact the leading organ in moth perception since the very antennae catch single pheromone molecules what informs male of where should he seek for a female. Antennae consist of lots of hairs which permanently vibrating at a regular frequency. As the pheromone molecule gets on a hair, the vibration changes and a male receives the sensory signal.
A new detector works in a similar way. It's covered with titanium dioxide nanotubes which TNT molecules get “glued” to. Just as the hairs of the moth antennae, nanotubes are fixed to a stalk with only one end, therefore they continuously and steadily waff, in a way, say, springboards do.
Albeit this process immediately changes its course once the detector “catches sight” of even the slightest amount of TNT dust at close distance. At the moment the quivering nanotube drags in a molecule of explosive, the vibration frequency changes and the sensory system of the detector is signalled of that there is an explosive close by.
Altogether, the titanium dioxide coating and vibrating nanopores provide a highly sensitive system which is capable to catch up to one part per trillion of TNT and similar explosives. “The system answers in real time so you can put the sensors in luggage rooms at the airport,” says Denis Spitzer, the author of the system. His research was partially funded by the French defence procurement agency, Spitzer as well offers the device to militaries.
Further versions of the detector will be replenished with different kinds of bristles so as it could catch at a time molecules of various explosives. “A first step will be to make it even more sensitive than it is now,” says Spitzer.
One of the significant advantages of the new device is its immediate reaction, though Spitzer notes that the detector still has to be tested for its ability to spot explosives from far away. “A version of the detector made with different materials could detect tiny amounts of chemicals in water as well,” Spitzer says.
Co.Exist, http://www.fastcoexist.com
Photo: Bombyx mori, (Walter S. Leal), http://www.chm.bris.ac.uk
Silk moth male, В. mori

27.06.2012 22:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Joined previous speakers;)! Or either. You should not "tear" is clearly a single group. And how to call ... supraspecific systematics very subjective thing :)

27.06.2012 20:06, Peter Khramov:

Creeping out...

27.06.2012 20:06, Peter Khramov:

That's Caliban...

27.06.2012 20:04, Peter Khramov:

No, it's good. We have no photos of its underside so this one as good as it's first.

27.06.2012 0:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Oh ... Can it be in the genus Armenia. :)

In fact, the situation is somewhat more complicated than I wrote in the previous post, and briefly as follows. Rhode Satyrium Nearctic is the type species. In one version of the classification of all our species of this group together with their relatives in the Nearctic one genus - Satyrium.Ergo, if any Palaearctic species of this group are in the genus Satyrium, then they should all be there, otherwise the logic breaks down.

But there are other classification. For example, you can leave non-Arctic species in the genus Satyrium, Palaearctic and collected in a separate genus.We called it The blue Nordmannia, but Korb and Bolshakov offer - and probably rightly - Fihsenia, as it is described in the same work page earlier. :)

There are other versions ... For example, all in the genus satyrium, but it distinguished subgenera. Then ledereri usually sent to "his" subgenus - Armenia. :)

In general, it is a confusing business - systematics.:) If I had made a decision - would connect all the names in the genus Satyrium. This is usually done in Europe, and so was originally on the site. However, the desire to follow the blue stain caused confusion.

"In short," wrote ...;)

26.06.2012 21:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The underside needed.

26.06.2012 20:20, Peter Khramov:

A few dozen taxa updated. Also 25 new species and about 4500 synonyms added.

26.06.2012 16:45, Peter Khramov:

Nordmannia esculi I still find references, and for ledereri only Satyrium ... correctly to be in such a situation is still transferring to Nordmannia?

26.06.2012 12:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.06.2012 2:24, Eugene Karolinskiy:

With regards Nordmannia vs Satyrium: Peter, what do you suggest, IMHO, it is illogical. We need them all in one race. What - not so important. Let Nordmannia.

26.06.2012 2:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

ilia.

25.06.2012 21:27, Lev Bely:


There is an amazing place near Nairobi, the capital of Kenya — Karura forest recently opened to visitors. Kenyan photographer Karue Wachira made pictures of the forest butterflies, which can be seen today at The Butterflies of Karura Forest 2012 exhibition at the KFEET Centre.
Once Karura forest was a tasty morsel for quarrelling politicians and investors, but now it's a beautiful place for rest, walks and watching spectacular African animals which feel good and stay here cool, though it's not that far from the city centre.
Karue Wachira, intentionally or not, chose butterflies which undergo a set of transformations just as Karura forest did. Now it's cared for and nice to look at, whilst in its past the forest sheltered Mau-Mau rebels struggling for independence, either was itself an object of struggle between authorities and professor Wangari Maathai which finally succeeded to save it from the illegal deforestation, or even was a “shrine” for local gang bands and their hideous executions. Lately, a diplomat's wife got to re-establish Karura and eventually the forest was changed to a proper educational centre with tourists trails and rest areas.
One day Karue Wachira came here. Looking for butterflies he circled around the forest about 10 km, while there are actually all 50 km of trails. The good shot might take patience and a long wait, even for hours. Butterflies tend to fly away when disturbed with a slightest movement, and you have to start off all the thing again.
“I had to hang around for a long time for them to gain trust on me,” he says. “I realised if someone stayed calm in the butterfly’s environment, the butterflies would comfortably sit on them.” He took lots of photos in such moments, yet they're not part of the exhibition.
The exhibition displays 11 butterfly species which were identified for Karue in The National Museums of Kenya (NMK). There are such as a bright orange spotted Common Leopard (Phalanta phalantha), a lemon yellow Common Dotted Border (Mylothris agathina), its wings look like they're stamped with black on the edge, and a contrast Narrow Green Banded Swallowtail (Papilio nireus) with black wings ornated with longwise stripes of sky blue.
Karue's primary idea was to make a calendar, yet it wasn't produced as he finished shooting in March, apparently too late. Then he applied to Friends of Karura Forest, a Community Forest Association (CFA), where he was already known, and the association gladly offered him to arrange a photo exhibition.
The Butterflies of Karura Forest 2012 as other exhibitions of the kind, is not merely about butterflies, but the bit of special human attention that the nature lacks much. Karanja Njoroge, the association chairman, wrote in the comment book at the exhibition: “Incredible photography! Amazing beauty unnoticed by a busy eye. Hongera bwana Karue, I will keep one for myself.”
The exhibition will run until June 30 at the KFEET Centre, Nairobi.
Standard Digital, http://www.standardmedia.co.ke, Friends of Karura Forest, http://www.friendsofkarura.org
Photo: Narrow Green Banded Swallowtail P. nireus, Karue Wachira, http://www.friendsofkarura.org
Butterflies of Kenya

25.06.2012 15:35, Peter Khramov:

With regards Nordmannia vs Satyrium: all kinds of out of the blue to go Nordmannia, those species which is not in the blue, and in the fauna there - to Satyrium. Plus Nordmannia abdominalis, which has neither there nor there.

25.06.2012 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. tentacularia.

25.06.2012 13:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.06.2012 13:38, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

25.06.2012 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.06.2012 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

25.06.2012 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, consider that offer all how a commonly used.

25.06.2012 12:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

25.06.2012 10:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And what do they offer? Announce the list pzhlsta.

25.06.2012 8:17, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Supposedly, Scopula corrivalaria (Kretschmar, 1862).

25.06.2012 7:22, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Cabera exanthemata (Scopoli 1763).

25.06.2012 7:15, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Chlorissa viridata (Linnaeus, 1758).

25.06.2012 7:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

25.06.2012 7:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

25.06.2012 7:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

24.06.2012 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Wrongly identified as Hypena proboscidalis since it's Polypogon tentacularia.

24.06.2012 20:31, Lev Bely:

Unlike the preceding part 4, today's even fight one on one nearly ended in victory, save suddenly the near-winner got disloyally attacked from the rear. Confidence lost and the strong, powerful opponent has helplessly run off. If perpetual dominance is real? Take the time to know it soon.

24.06.2012 20:16, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

24.06.2012 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it's pandora indeed, might I be wrong. Sorry, I'm just spending all my time in the hospital at the moment with my cerebrovascular grandma, can't check it out properly. Not lathonia at all. Petr, move it to pandora.

24.06.2012 18:06, Igor Sakhno:

Nymphalis sp.

24.06.2012 16:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.06.2012 16:31, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

24.06.2012 14:59, Maxim Schwarz:

Even the Poplar Admiral (Limenitis populi) crowds around!:-)

24.06.2012 13:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, it's not by any means. This is a pale Satyrium pruni.

24.06.2012 13:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Euclidia mi.

24.06.2012 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved to icarus like http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13207.

24.06.2012 12:36, Peter Khramov:

If it's indeed as identified?

24.06.2012 12:34, Peter Khramov:

Error while uploading? Should be one of pandora, not lathonia...

24.06.2012 9:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

24.06.2012 9:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.06.2012 19:24, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Odontopera bidentata (Clerck, 1759).

23.06.2012 19:24, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Odontopera bidentata (Clerck, 1759).

23.06.2012 8:40, Olga Cherepanova:

The photos actually depict the same butterfly. If the first one was identified as Polyommatus icarus, then this is icarus too, probably, female... They're so similar... these two species...

23.06.2012 2:33, Peter Khramov:

G-yes, I have a preliminary agreement with foreign suppliers and local Trade Organization to establish a new entomological online store. Who is the first actual delivery of goods, as they say, on trial.Please speak those using entomological equipment, which products are relevant on an ongoing basis and, therefore, the most suitable for this trial. The more specific - the better. Here (easier to talk) or just email me.
ZY If all the successful start - everyone who has access to this subject, special conditions for purchases; -)

22.06.2012 7:44, Evgeny Komarov:

According to most sources is purely Mediterranean appearance, not the Descending eastern Spain-France. Therefore, it is not in the blue. But dragging in our Nordmannia, leaving a similar species in the western Satyrium? Oh, take it or commercials. I would prefer to stick to blue.

22.06.2012 1:42, Maxim Schwarz:

They changed indeed! Week ago I was driving through Bryansk region and there were loads of http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/8616! Flying in swarms. Did not I even come out to shoot 'em since done it way too much. The opposite, I still can't make a good shot of the blackleg tortoiseshell (Nymphalis polychloros). :(

22.06.2012 0:45, Lev Bely:

Blocked.

21.06.2012 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Is video blocked from embedding, or?

21.06.2012 22:21, Lev Bely:


Moths are as marvelously diverse as wrongly misattended. They get rare minutes of fame when we enjoy our tea outside in summer accompanied by their shadows fluttering around lights. In fact, in the animal world those slight shadows play a role way far from slight. Each adult butterfly or moth leaves behind lots of caterpillars which had to turn into not an imago but the vital food for songbirds, beetles, wasps and other predators. Barely few of caterpillars are lucky to reach the imago stage and even then those trying to spread their brand new wings are a long awaited dinner for bats, birds and legless flycatchers.
In the state of Ohio, USA, there are about 2500 moth species which can be met here and there. Most of them wouldn't even try to engage in beauty pageants just as no one but a few truly keen entomologists could pay them some attention. Yet there are as well local “superstars”, which beauty makes anyone stop and gaze at.
Giant silkworm moths are most popular in Ohio. There are 18 species of Saturniidae family, and these huge, bright moths are always a special sight. The biggest can be of bat size like the Cecropia Moth (Hyalophora cecropia) with a 15cm wingspan. Nearly of the same size is the beautiful pastel green Luna Moth (Actias luna) — one of the most recognizable moths of Northern America due to its high popularity.
The luna moth begins its life in one of 300 eggs laid by a female on an apposite feed plant. Those apposite include four tree species such as cherry, beech, hickory and walnut. 10 days after tiny caterpillars hatch from eggs and start eating foliage. Every week the caterpillar exuviates, in other words, throws off its skin, and gets bigger. This takes 5 times (ages), after that the luna caterpillar gets to the adult stage. The mature caterpillar is large, brightly green, about 7,5cm length, it has clawed bearlike legs, vivid orange spots longwise and bundles of stiff hairs.
Soon the mature caterpillar forms a cocoon and then overwinters, in case it happens in the end of the summer. In cocoons formed at the beginning of the season, caterpillars spend two weeks to eventually transform into a luna moth of a spectacular beauty. Once seen, this apple-green tailed moth is pretty hard to forget. Its large forewings are fringed with a deep purple-brown stripe whilst hind wings end with a swanky double tail with tips slightly curled.
How come such a gorgeous thing doesn't fall victim at the very first hours of its life? It gets clear if to look at it from above: you can discern... a tree branch with swelling buds and leaves-wings which are all actually that very luna moth.
It lives nothing but a week, just to mate and lay eggs. It has reduced mouth parts so doesn't feed. Males are fashioned with great feathery antennae interspersed with sensitive receptors which are even more responsive than a bloodhound's nose. That's why males are capable to catch female pheromones more than 1,5 km away.
Luna moths couple at night, and then there will be new generations of the luna just as other moths of the same amazing beauty — in Ohio and everywhere.
The Columbus Dispatch, http://www.dispatch.com
Photo: the Luna Moth, A. luna
The Luna Moth life-cycle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atOSro3_W7c

21.06.2012 21:32, Peter Khramov:

Messrs, we continued with the brothel Nordmannia / Satyrium. We stopped at that Nordmannia - a more appropriate option. But there is a question: whether all the species that are now on the site under Satyrium, you can drag in Nordmannia or not? For example, in the blue they are not all in Nordmannia present.Who thinks about this?
For example, this is now Satyrium esculi The fauna is indicated for the Russian Federation, and in the blue of the species is not at all ...

21.06.2012 18:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yet the species identified right, it's Xanthorhoe quadrifasiata on this website.

21.06.2012 18:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Ochyria quadrifasciaria by Synyov is Ochyria quadrifasciaria on the Fauna Europea. :)

21.06.2012 17:19, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.06.2012 17:18, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

21.06.2012 17:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

21.06.2012 17:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

21.06.2012 17:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

21.06.2012 17:17, Peter Khramov:

Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata synonym, right?

21.06.2012 16:55, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Most probably, this is Trichopteryx carpinata...

21.06.2012 16:41, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 16:40, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 16:39, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 16:38, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 16:14, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Ectropis crepuscularia ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775).

21.06.2012 15:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 15:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

21.06.2012 15:53, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Ochyria quadrifasciaria (Clerck, 1759) is below.

21.06.2012 15:50, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Ochyria quadrifasciaria (Clerck, 1759).

21.06.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.06.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.06.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.06.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.06.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.06.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.06.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.06.2012 15:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Colobochyla salicalis.

21.06.2012 15:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to S. rivularis.

21.06.2012 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sideridis rivularis.

21.06.2012 15:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

The upper is Colobochyla salicalis.

21.06.2012 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Suppose, this is Lacanobia contigua.

21.06.2012 15:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think it's Lacanobia contigua.

21.06.2012 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think it's Lacanobia contigua.

21.06.2012 15:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Suppose, this is Lacanobia contigua.

21.06.2012 15:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think it's Lacanobia contigua.

21.06.2012 15:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think it's Lacanobia contigua.

21.06.2012 15:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Suppose, this is Lacanobia contigua.

21.06.2012 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13323.

21.06.2012 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13323.

21.06.2012 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13323.

21.06.2012 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13323.

21.06.2012 14:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.06.2012 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

21.06.2012 14:24, Sergey Titov:

Arctia caja caterpillars look like this one right after exuviation.

21.06.2012 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

21.06.2012 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

21.06.2012 12:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's it.

21.06.2012 10:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Amata phegea.

21.06.2012 6:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just as all Arctia caja.

21.06.2012 2:28, Peter Khramov:

The catalogue search parameters now presented as toggle buttons which are apparently handier to use than former oversized drop-down lists. If anyone of you notice anything works better/worse, please comment right here or e-mail me.

21.06.2012 1:06, Peter Khramov:

Pretty one)

21.06.2012 1:05, Peter Khramov:

Nemophora degeerella too?

20.06.2012 23:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vagrans egista male (Cramer, [1780]).

20.06.2012 18:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.06.2012 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, move it where I said (no versions): http://www.ukbutterflies.co.uk/species.php?species=lathonia.

20.06.2012 12:44, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, there was no any reproach ;--)

20.06.2012 7:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well-known caterpillar :)

20.06.2012 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Issoria lathonia.

20.06.2012 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, I hurried to show this one just caught not to miss it, so no more photos but this "pinned". I uploaded the very unspread specimen because the color contrast seen better.

20.06.2012 0:09, Peter Khramov:

As straight as a die...

19.06.2012 12:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.06.2012 12:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully" just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13292.

19.06.2012 12:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

19.06.2012 11:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could be moved to "identified successfully" as well as #13291.

19.06.2012 11:01, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Hypena proboscidalis (barely seen its long antennae on the dark background).

19.06.2012 0:57, Lev Bely:


Senior Supporter Officer for Butterfly Conservation, Dorset
Butterfly Conservation’s Head Office in Dorset (UK) has an opening for a Senior Supporter Officer.
Butterfly Conservation is a leading wildlife charity working to conserve butterflies, moths and our environment. We have ambitious plans to significantly increase our supporter base as part of our vision for the future.
We wish to recruit a Senior Supporter Officer to manage the development of our membership and supporter services.
For this busy role you will need in-depth knowledge and experience of managing a supporter/ membership database and the ability to use reporting tools to analyse data. A strong marketing background and excellent organisational skills will also be essential.
Main duties will include: managing all areas of supporter development and recruitment campaigns; producing reports and statistical information; overseeing effective servicing of members and supporters to ensure highest possible retention rates.
This is a key, full time post based at Butterfly Conservation’s Head Office in Dorset.
Closing date: noon on Wednesday 4 July 2012.
Interviews will be held on Tuesday 17 July 2012 in East Lulworth.
Please visit our website to download an application pack: www.butterfly-conservation.org, or call 01929 406012, or email sbrading@butterfly-conservation.org.
Senior Research Associate — Entomologist for Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia, Saint Petersburg)
Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences opens a competitive vacancy of a Senior Research Associate — Entomologist (Ph.D. in entomology) to work at the institute museum. Details of the competition procedure and job requirements available on the institute website: http://www.ras.ru/vacancy.aspx. The job is offered to all those having qualified academic rank in accordance with such of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
Please, send your applications and documents required to Oleg N. Pugatchov, Russia, 1 Universitetskaya Naberezhnaya, 199034, Saint Petersburg. Questions and more: +7 (812) 328-03-11.
The job offer is valid for two months since the day it was announced, until 5 August 2012. The competition will start off two months after the announcement.
Graduate Research Assistantship for the North Dakota State University (USA)
North Dakota State University seeks for a motivated student to pursue a Master of Science degree in Entomology at North Dakota state University, Fargo, ND. The research project will examine the chemical ecology of insect pests on a native crop plant (sunflower).
Qualifications include a bachelor’s degree, with a major in entomology, biology or chemistry. The targeted start date is Fall 2012.
The selected student will receive an annual stipend (commensurate with qualifications) and free tuition.
Applicants should provide academic transcripts, a statement of research and career aspirations, available start date, and names of three academic references.
Send application materials to stephen.foster@ndsu.edu or jarrad.prasifka@ars.usda.gov.
Contact Name: Stephen Foster or Jarrad Prasifka, phone: 701-231-6444 or 701-239-1313.
Environmentjob.co.uk, http://www.environmentjob.co.uk, Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, http://www.zin.ru, The Entomological Society of America (ESA), http://www.entsoc.org
Photo: Parnassius mnemosyne eggs

18.06.2012 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to M. brunneata.

18.06.2012 19:04, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Perhaps, Itame brunneata males.

18.06.2012 18:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 18:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.06.2012 8:41, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.06.2012 19:22, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the timing glitches are, right now, very few have found. Gradually, I will fix it. If someone finds something else - reported.

17.06.2012 17:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13117.

17.06.2012 17:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13117.

17.06.2012 17:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13117.

17.06.2012 17:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.06.2012 17:03, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

17.06.2012 17:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.06.2012 17:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.06.2012 17:01, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.06.2012 14:40, Vlad Proklov:

Aphomia sociella.

17.06.2012 14:40, Vlad Proklov:

Syricoris lacunana.

17.06.2012 14:40, Vlad Proklov:

Platyptilia gonodactyla.

17.06.2012 14:39, Vlad Proklov:

Platyptilia gonodactyla.

17.06.2012 14:39, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

17.06.2012 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you have to remove the bears from dubbing if I'm not mistaken.
It http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6681 and it http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23012 - one species.
And it http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/6680 and it http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/23009 - also one little animal.

17.06.2012 13:46, Peter Khramov:

Xanthorhoe fluctuata?

17.06.2012 13:36, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" so far.

17.06.2012 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13128.

17.06.2012 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved just as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13128.

17.06.2012 13:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain" so far.

17.06.2012 13:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.06.2012 13:31, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain" so far.

17.06.2012 13:31, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" so far.

17.06.2012 13:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.06.2012 13:30, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.06.2012 13:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.06.2012 13:30, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.06.2012 13:29, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

17.06.2012 13:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

17.06.2012 13:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved to X. ferrugata "uncertain".

17.06.2012 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vindula erota male.

17.06.2012 12:17, Andrey Sazykin:

Evgeny, thanks! Its dark color quite confused me.. Afro thing :)

17.06.2012 12:00, Andrey Sazykin:

Looks quite similar to Acronicta auricoma..

17.06.2012 12:00, Andrey Sazykin:

Looks quite similar to Acronicta auricoma..

17.06.2012 10:08, Olga Averyanova:

The feed plant (not on the photo) is Galinsoga ciliata, http://www.plantarium.ru/page/view/item/16915.html.

17.06.2012 1:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Th. sylvestris.

17.06.2012 1:48, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. icarus.

17.06.2012 1:48, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M. phoebe.

17.06.2012 1:47, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M. phoebe.

17.06.2012 1:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

N. w-album.

16.06.2012 20:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hem... What did you await? Don't they live on nectar alone.... :)

16.06.2012 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.06.2012 8:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Lasiommata maera.

15.06.2012 22:46, Peter Khramov:

Natural history.

15.06.2012 19:07, Lev Bely:


In Cumberland House Natural History Museum things go normally just as butterflies keep emerging from their cocoons. This process will last May to September in the museum butterfly house where a permanent high temperature kept. Other museum joys also include lectures on a local wildlife, Portsmouth riverbank dwellers, swamps, forests and urban areas. Aqua-ists will be happy to know more about geology, look at fishes and insects in the aquarium and then go welcome “Emily” the dinosaur to have a minute tittle-tattle of all mentioned.
“Cumberland House is extremely popular with children and the butterfly house is one of the main highlights. It is a great way of bringing the popular 'The very hungry caterpillar' story to life! Visit soon if you want to see the butterflies emerging.” says Dr. Jane Mee, Portsmouth's museum and records service manager.
Recently the museum got put on the 20 museum longlist of the Family Friendly Museum Awards, arranged by The Sunday Telegraph and Kids in Museums independent charity.
Cumberland House Natural History Museum is open daily 10—17:30, free entrance. Portsmouth (UK), Southsea, next to Canoe Lake.
“Western Wings: Moths and butterflies of Connemara” exhibition at the Connemara National Park (Ireland)

Most people tend to consider moths as those annoying little critters that suddenly fly out of wardrobe and gather around lights at night. Some still deem that moths do deserve a bit better than just an ace smash with a rolled newspaper. Heather Greer, a Galway photographer, is amidst the latter.
“You may think of butterflies as bright and colourful, while moths are brown and dull,” says Heather Greer, “but many moths in fact are highly coloured and beautiful; they deserve to be looked at and admired.”
That's what she exactly proves in her photo exhibition “Western Wings: Moths and butterflies of Connemara” now can be seen at the Connemara National Park, Letterfrack. There are over 80 photos of butterflies and moths either their caterpillars. The show will run until July 8th.
“The subjects here are by no means rare or uncommon to see,” says Heather. “Rather, they are all around us; it’s just that many of us just don’t notice that they’re there! What I would like to achieve through this exhibition is a raised awareness of both the beauty and the ecological value of butterflies and especially of moths.”
AboutMyArea, http://www.aboutmyarea.co.uk, Advertiser.ie, http://www.advertiser.ie
Photo 1: a butterfly in Cumberland House Natural History Museum, http://photos.igougo.com/pictures-photos-p565845-Southsea_Butterfly_House.html
Photo 2: Garden Tiger moth Arctia caja, Heather Greer, http://www.galwaynews.ie

15.06.2012 12:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.06.2012 22:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Xanthorhoe ferrugata maybe??

14.06.2012 17:50, Peter Khramov:

No any suggestions?..

14.06.2012 17:48, Peter Khramov:

Back to "undetermined" then.

14.06.2012 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That's not ino.

14.06.2012 0:59, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

14.06.2012 0:59, Peter Khramov:

That's right as well as on the photo nearby. Moved.

14.06.2012 0:51, Masha Gill:

Brenthis ino.

14.06.2012 0:44, Masha Gill:

Lasiocampa quercus?

14.06.2012 0:20, Lev Bely:


Moths, like many other insects, are led by smells when they seek for food, egg-laying site and, certainly, a mate. University of Utah recent research reveals how moth males prepare themselves to take a flight towards females that effuse pheromones. Biologists arranged an olfactory experience in the course of which they blew pheromones about, so the treated moths would begin warming up their flight muscles to take off quickly.
Males found to hurry too much trying to take off before their body got warm enough for a good flight, according to José Crespo, a doctoral candidate who conducted the experiments.
The question is what's evolutionary more advantageous, best start or better warm-up that apparently provides a better flight? It's still to be answered in other researches since Crespo observed only takeoffs. “The important thing is decision-making. This has to do with sensing stimuli that can be visual or olfactory, and responding appropriately. It tells us how animals make decisions,” Crespo said.
Crespo's team worked with Helicoverpa zea moths of Noctuidae family which comprises over 35,000 species. They chose that very species due to it's known as a serious agricultural pest, so it's a good model for unveiling of how its brains transduce scent signals.
Helicoverpa zea caterpillars are commonly named “corn ear worm” thanks to they devour corn, yet they're also known as the “cotton bollworm” or “tomato fruitworm” depend on what crop they feed on. Crespo's experiments can improve nontoxic methods aimed to reduce H. zea reproduction rates without using pesticides.
Each species of this huge family effuses a scent mix that can contain up to five pheromones. “You can imagine with 35,000 species there is a lot of cross talk out there. They are all using similar words, if you will, but arranged in different orders,” said Neil Vickers, senior author on the study and the chairman of the U. biology department. “Males have to be picky when interpreting these pheromonal sentences. Otherwise you can make a mistake, and that can be very costly. If they end up coupling with the wrong species, they become tangled and can’t decouple.”
So males not only have to choose the right female but also should they be “an early bird” when it comes to coupling. Natural selection favors those not procrastinating as to make offspring. Winner is the one who arrives in time and does his best to compete.
Crespo constructed a foot-long wind tunnel and placed one of six scents at the upwind side of the cardboard box propelled by a 1 mph breeze towards males that never coupled before. One of the scents was a common H. zea sex attractant. Crespo observed how much time it took for males to prepare themselves for flight when they warmed up their opposing flight muscles by squeezing those and making them shiver. He monitored changes of their body temperatures recording the process with infrared cameras.
The second stage was to measure males' lifting force at different body temperatures. Crespo placed moths inside a small Styrofoam ball and bound them to a force meter, then made moths take off by pulling the ball down. Curious that the optimal body temperature for a good flight appeared to be about 90 degrees while in the “pheromone” test males attempted to take off, averagely, at 82 degrees.
“Insect flight muscles are among the most metabolically costly in the animal kingdom. In order to fly, you have to use a lot of oxygen and generate the power,” Vickers said. “The decision to take flight after a female odor is not one that would be taken lightly by the moth because it’s expensive.”
The study results published on June 7th in the Journal of Experimental Biology. The research supported by the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. University biologist Franz Goller is a study's co-author.
The Salt Lake Tribune, http://www.sltrib.com
Photo: José Crespo with one of the H. zea experimental moth, Rick Egan, http://www.sltrib.com
Moth male warming up before flight (University of Utah infrared shoot)

13.06.2012 9:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thanks, I'll check it.

12.06.2012 19:44, Peter Khramov:

About 4700 new taxa added to the Lepidoptera database. Near time I'll add the photos uploaded long ago yet not being published simply because of that the website species database lacked those apposite.

12.06.2012 3:06, Aleks Brown:

Suspect it might be the Lapland Ringlet (Erebia embla).

12.06.2012 1:17, Peter Khramov:

Looking forward to the next series :--)

11.06.2012 21:21, Lev Bely:

Fail again! Swanky penguins literally lost their balance trying to catch a butterfly. Tailcoats off, hairdos ruined, someone had to take an unplanned dive, another got a dangerous peck from its neighbour. Guys just should've have checked up beforehand last season' matches with otters, a dog and a lizard. One big helpless hand (or wing) gesture... 0:4!

11.06.2012 20:06, Lev Bely:


Ted Edwards was so earnest in studying taxonomy that eventually appeared to be a honorary fellow of the Australian National Insect Collection and was also named on the Queen's Birthday Honours list for the services to taxonomy.
Over 50 years Ted Edwards has been studying Australian moths that are, by his own words, “enormously fascinating, astonishingly beautiful and vital to landscape health”. Australian moths do show a rich variety: there are more than 20000 species including small sun moths (Synemon plana) which are active in the daytime and saucer-size rainforest moths (Trisyntopa neossophila). The latter feign dry leaves while their caterpillars are pretty good in playing midget tree snakes when rear up in order to deter predators.
Furthermore, Australian moths turn out to be true firebrands. Edwards explains numerous moth species live in and eat dry leaf litter, raising questions about long-term impacts of controlled burns on forest ecology. “The fires kill the moths. So the question is, are we still looking at the Australian landscape through European eyes when we use these methods. Perhaps we might do better to study the role of the moths in breaking down the litter.”
He wrote over 100 works on Australian moths and made Member of the Order of Australia, for services to entomology and taxonomy and his contribution to Canberra's National Insect Collection. Edwards also helped the Australian Moths Online directory as an advocate arranging an online database of Australian moths being a part of the large volunteering team at CSIRO's (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) former entomology division.
Ted Edwards grew up on a commercial table grape vineyard in the Southern Highlands and got fascinated with butterflies and moths in the very childhood. “My parents were keenly interested in the natural environment. They had a magnificent garden, full of plants to attract native butterflies and moths. They'd also made sure they were food plants for the caterpillars, so I grew up learning about the cycle of lepidoptera life,” he said.
Having began as an agronomist, Edwards joined CSIRO in 1970 and co-authored three books on Australian moths. He seems to feel a little bit sad that there are just few remaining taxonomists in Australia. “Taxonomists are the ones who actually communicate science, by giving names to things. Anyone doubting the importance of taxonomists should cross out all nouns and pronouns in a paragraph. Do that and you're left with a jumble of words that don't make sense.”
The Canberra Times, http://www.canberratimes.com.au
Photo: Ted Edwards and Northern Queensland moths Trisyntopa neossophila, Stuart Walmsley
Largest Australian Hercules moth Coscinocera hercules

11.06.2012 14:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

11.06.2012 14:06, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved )

11.06.2012 14:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

11.06.2012 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Monopis monachella.

11.06.2012 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula floslactata.

11.06.2012 10:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This firebrand is Monopis monachella :)

10.06.2012 16:20, Peter Khramov:

Not a "wood-looking thing", but tiny log!

10.06.2012 16:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.06.2012 16:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.06.2012 16:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.06.2012 16:19, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.06.2012 16:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.06.2012 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female. Yet kinda weird, I've never seen it had blue spots.

10.06.2012 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

10.06.2012 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

10.06.2012 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

10.06.2012 8:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

10.06.2012 0:29, Lev Bely:

Leave the background and do look at the wood-looking thing!

10.06.2012 0:27, Peter Khramov:

Didn't dig the background was commented...

09.06.2012 23:14, Lev Bely:

Pretty wood-looking thing.

09.06.2012 20:46, Lev Bely:

Both added.

09.06.2012 0:00, Peter Khramov:

The photo does suit well :--)

09.06.2012 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University. Agricultural Academy (probably) too.

08.06.2012 23:40, Lev Bely:


Below you may find the list of Russian universities which offer education in the field of entomology. If you feel like a certain Russian uni (college, academy) should be put in this list and you're sure it lacks such, please mention its name and location in comments so as it would be added hereto.

Lomonosov Moscow State University, http://www.msu.ru
Moscow State Pedagogical University, http://www.mpgu.edu
Moscow state Academy of Veterinary medicine and Biotechnology, http://www.mgavm.ru
Moscow State Regional University, Institute of Nature and Ecology, http://www.mgou.ru
Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University (Moscow), http://www.rgazu.ru
Russian State Agrarian University — Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, http://www.timacad.ru
Russian State Pedagogical (Gertsen) University (Saint Petersburg), http://www.herzen.spb.ru
Tomsk State University, Institute of Biology, Ecology, Soil Science, Agriculture and Forestry, http://www.tsu.ru, http://bio.tsu.ru
Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, http://www.unn.ru
Kazan (Volga region) Federal University, http://kpfu.ru
Irkutsk State University, http://www.isu.ru
Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University, http://yspu.org
Samara State Academy of Social Sciences and Humanities, http://www.pgsga.ru
Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, http://www.kspu.ru
Kemerovo State University, http://www.kemsu.ru
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (Moscow), http://www.rudn.ru
Kirov Military Medical Academy (Saint Petersburg), http://vmeda.spb.ru
Saint Petersburg State University, http://www.spbu.ru
Tver State University, http://university.tversu.ru
Udmurt State University (Izhevsk), http://udsu.ru
Ulyanovsk State University, http://www.ulsu.ru
Ural State University (Yekaterinburg), http://urfu.ru
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University (Kaliningrad), http://www.kantiana.ru
Sakhalin State University (Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk), http://www.sakhgu.ru
Novosibirsk State University, http://www.nsu.ru
Tyumen State University, http://go.utmn.ru
Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University, http://mininuniver.ru
Nizhniy Novgorod State Agricultural Academy, http://www.agri.sci-nnov.ru

Photo: Cerura vinula

08.06.2012 22:37, Olga Averyanova:

Yes, that's it.

08.06.2012 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Some subjects concerning lepidoptera could be way more useful when implemented as not only a publication, but specialized software of kinds like either online identification guides—polytomic to name but a few, or catalogues with maps, or other similar stuff.
The more, such software might be even more handy being synchronized to the on hand taxonomic system, catalogue and image gallery.
Thus, in case you've got some ready to use soft yet are not eager to embed it yourself on a certain website or whatever it could fit well, e-mail me or comment here and I'll get it embedded and then, if needed, synchronize it to Lepidoptera.pro databases. You'll keep leading your project however. No any original rights defied therefore :--) Look how it could work out on http://lepidoptera.ru/projects (sorry, in Russian only at the moment).

08.06.2012 18:21, Peter Khramov:

Guess, that's there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/13143.

07.06.2012 21:22, Svetlana Karaeva:

Thanks to Alexandr Zhakov and you, Petr!!!

07.06.2012 21:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Possible to look at its upper-side?

07.06.2012 20:47, Maria Pozdnova:

Looks like Epirrhoe alternata.

07.06.2012 20:40, Maria Pozdnova:

Seems to be rather Epirrhoe alternata. Otherwise its color is way out of line.

07.06.2012 20:31, Maria Pozdnova:

Looks quite similar to Xanthorhoe ferrugata faded out much.

07.06.2012 19:12, Olga Averyanova:

Meh, still so much to know :))) Not each species' areal extent do I check up though.

07.06.2012 18:12, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.06.2012 18:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.06.2012 18:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.06.2012 18:11, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.06.2012 18:11, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

07.06.2012 18:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.06.2012 18:10, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.06.2012 18:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.06.2012 18:09, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.06.2012 18:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.06.2012 18:07, Peter Khramov:

Goes to males.

07.06.2012 18:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.06.2012 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

07.06.2012 15:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

07.06.2012 13:18, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

07.06.2012 10:55, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

07.06.2012 10:54, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

07.06.2012 2:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calliteara pudibunda.

07.06.2012 2:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calliteara pudibunda.

07.06.2012 2:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Notodonta ziczac.

07.06.2012 2:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agrotis exclamationis.

07.06.2012 2:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agrotis exclamationis.

07.06.2012 2:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Notodonta ziczac.

07.06.2012 2:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calophasia lunula.

07.06.2012 0:45, Peter Khramov:

Timandra comae?

07.06.2012 0:43, Peter Khramov:

Chiasmia clathrata?

07.06.2012 0:43, Peter Khramov:

Chiasmia clathrata?

07.06.2012 0:41, Peter Khramov:

Lepidoptera gallery has just surpassed 10000 photos...

06.06.2012 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I'll move it once the species gets databased.

06.06.2012 19:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.06.2012 19:18, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

06.06.2012 19:17, Peter Khramov:

Ok, now it's Aporia crataegi since fell off an ashberry tree...

06.06.2012 19:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Junonia orithya female. Junonia coenia is an American species.

06.06.2012 19:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Junonia orithya female.

06.06.2012 18:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It's clear just as it "fell off an ashberry tree".

06.06.2012 18:33, Maria Pozdnova:

Whoa, highly curious turn! Thanks!

06.06.2012 18:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

06.06.2012 18:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

06.06.2012 18:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Euploea crameri female, a good thing.

06.06.2012 18:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is an Aporia crataegi pupa.

06.06.2012 18:12, Maria Pozdnova:

Consilium medicum!

06.06.2012 17:59, Maria Pozdnova:

So how much it takes for it to emerge? One week passed with no changes shown from it.

06.06.2012 17:33, Peter Khramov:

Why "unlucky"? Pupae are able to move, this one just hasn't emerged yet.

06.06.2012 2:22, Peter Khramov:

Good sitting!

06.06.2012 2:03, Peter Khramov:

Went to A. tripartita.

06.06.2012 2:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. tripartita.

06.06.2012 2:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. tripartita.

06.06.2012 2:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. tripartita.

06.06.2012 2:01, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

06.06.2012 2:00, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

06.06.2012 2:00, Peter Khramov:

Since now it's icarus!)

06.06.2012 1:59, Peter Khramov:

So it goes to Coenonympha pamphilus.

06.06.2012 1:59, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.06.2012 1:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.06.2012 1:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.06.2012 1:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.06.2012 1:58, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

06.06.2012 1:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

06.06.2012 1:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

06.06.2012 0:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

I think it's Sideridis reticulata.

05.06.2012 21:06, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

05.06.2012 21:05, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

05.06.2012 21:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Loxostege sticticalis.

05.06.2012 21:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Melitaea phoebe.

05.06.2012 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Melitaea phoebe.

05.06.2012 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Melitaea phoebe.

05.06.2012 20:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Issoria lathonia.

05.06.2012 20:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

These are of two species. The left is Lycaena dispar, Coenonympha pamphilus is on the right.

05.06.2012 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

:) Polyommatus icarus.

05.06.2012 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cervyna cervago.

05.06.2012 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, it's an Abrostola tripartita.

05.06.2012 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, Abrostola tripartita.

05.06.2012 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, it's an Abrostola tripartita.

05.06.2012 20:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, it's an Abrostola tripartita.

05.06.2012 20:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Euclidia glyphica.

05.06.2012 16:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.06.2012 16:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.06.2012 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lycaena dispar female.

05.06.2012 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lycaena dispar female.

04.06.2012 18:31, Lev Bely:


Scientist I — Insecticide/Nematicide Research & Commericialization, AgraQuest, Inc. (Davis, CA, US)
Insects and mites cause significant crop losses in California, as well as other regions of the world. AgraQuest, Inc. is a successful Biopesticide company with microbial biofungicide and insecticide sales in the United States, Latin America, Europe, and Asia.
We are currently seeking a Research Scientist whose primary responsibility will be to focus on the basic biology of invertebrates, mode of action and structure/activity relationships of bioactive compounds, arthropod behavior, chemically-mediated growth promotion in plants, and the ecology of plant-invertebrate interactions. Strong consideration will be given to candidates with research experience in insect behavior.
The successful candidate will work as a member of the Entomology/Nematology team, which develops and supports new and proprietary natural product-based agricultural products. Working in close collaboration with other disciplines within the R&D group, the team develops and performs lab, greenhouse, and early-stage field trials, screens potential insecticides and nematicides, studies the interaction between invertebrates and host-plants, and supports the sales of existing products. A key component of the group’s responsibilities is the advancement of active candidates to early-stage development.
Excellent communication skills are required, as is a sense of passion for the rapid commercialization of new, first-in-class agricultural products. AgraQuest, Inc. has actively expanded its research infrastructure over the past 4 years, and the candidate will continue to identify new tools, techniques, and assays in an effort to more effectively develop novel and innovative crop protection products and solutions.
Educational Requirements and Job Experience:

Ph.D. in Entomology, Plant Physiology, or other agriculturally-related field and/or;
M.S degree and 2-5 years’ experience in industry or academic research.
Experience in Microbiology, Arthropod/host-plant relations and/or behavior desirable.
Experience in commercial crop protection research is desirable, but not required.

Knowledge:

Entomology, Plant Physiology, Ecology.
Basic agriculture/agronomy/ecology/soil science.
Statistical analysis.
Basic mathematic principles.
Microsoft 2007 suite of programs including, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook and Adobe.

Skills:

Experience with developing bioassays preferred but not essential.
Careful, precise and accurate laboratory technique.
Excellent verbal and written communication skills.

To apply, please send your resume with cover letter referencing job title to: jobs@agraquest.com.
Entomologist, FSHA Moscow Hygiene and Epidemiology Centre, Moscow (Russia, Moscow Eastern Autonomous District)
FSHA Moscow Hygiene and Epidemiology Centre has an opening for an entomologist.
The Centre provides expertises on enterprises, goods, project plans and other kind of official papers. We also arrange researches in microbiology, sanitary hygiene, radiology and other fields concerned.
Full-time job (half-time as well), paid annual regular and additional leaves, 17000 roubles month salary. The position is located at Moscow Hygiene and Epidemiology Centre, Moscow (Russia), near Perovo metro station.
Duties include:

arranging researches in entomology and parasitology;
statistical data gathering, elaborating and proper keeping;
summarizing and interpreting the results in official papers of kinds.

Qualification required: M.S degree in entomology or zoology.
Contact: http://msk.superjob.ru/rabota/vacancy-11978335.html (registration needed), or filial_vao@pochta.ru.
Assistant Professor, Field Crop Entomologist, Kansas State University (Kansas, US)
Assistant Professor, Department of Entomology and Southwest Area (KS) Extension Office. Field Crop Entomologist, 12-month, tenure track, 60% extension, 40% research.
Position is located at Southwest Research and Extension Center, Garden City, Kansas. Duties include developing a field crop entomology extension and applied research program for insect and mite pests of crops in western Kansas.
Qualifications required include a PhD in entomology, or a closely related discipline with a strong background in applied arthropod pest management. Application deadline is August 1, 2012.
SuperJob, http://msk.superjob.ru, The Entomological Society of America (ESA), http://www.entsoc.org
Photo: Papilio machaon pupae

04.06.2012 13:25, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

04.06.2012 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula floslactata.

02.06.2012 13:20, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.06.2012 13:19, Peter Khramov:

Ok, done.

02.06.2012 10:46, Olga Averyanova:

Can't say yet whether the website is good or not. I've got this one http://www.butterflycircle.org/sgchecklist.htm, Singapore butterflies. Koh Samui — http://www.samuibutterflies.com/insects/butterflies/, Chiang Mai — http://www.malaeng.com/blog/?p=7776.

02.06.2012 10:41, Olga Averyanova:

Could be Euploea klugii erichsonii?

02.06.2012 8:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Tyta luctuosa.

02.06.2012 8:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr, sure it's the same one, just an error! Let's move it to E. munita!

02.06.2012 8:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Certainly better, Thank you!

02.06.2012 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://yutaka.it-n.jp/, Thailand, Laos, Vietnam and others true butterflies.

01.06.2012 22:56, Peter Khramov:

Pulled. Location is probably not the right thing, but for now, in a hurry, I think it's better than nothing.

01.06.2012 22:00, Svetlana Karaeva:

Thanks for help.

01.06.2012 21:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one is at least yellow a bit. Diaphora mendica black is way darker :)

01.06.2012 20:41, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

01.06.2012 20:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Eublemma ostrina, identified by Alexey Matov!

01.06.2012 20:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, pulled out a possible "First aid kit" in a prominent place. This is especially significant when the tropics have to "guess" and those from time to time there are still online.

01.06.2012 17:33, Peter Khramov:

As the species gets databased, I'll move it.

01.06.2012 15:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Danaus melanippus hegesippus (Cramer,[1777]):
http://yutaka.it-n.jp/dan/30040010.html.

01.06.2012 15:01, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved to "identified successfully".

01.06.2012 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.06.2012 12:58, Peter Khramov:

One who named the species seemed to have thought kind of the same...

01.06.2012 12:57, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I load.

01.06.2012 12:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to M. tiliae.

01.06.2012 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Though specky, still not Athyma asura.

01.06.2012 6:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Mimas tiliae.

31.05.2012 23:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I threw in the LC Fautua Pyrausta porphyralis: Toy same butterflies that Vlad identified. As you asked :)

31.05.2012 22:12, Olga Averyanova:

Doesn't it look like Athyma asura? ... I'll shoot it in a moment and upload those mine who spread.

31.05.2012 19:58, Lev Bely:

Prince of darkness.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

31.05.2012 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2012 18:51, Peter Khramov:

Forest and bird!

31.05.2012 18:48, Peter Khramov:

Music is impressive indeed...

31.05.2012 11:58, Peter Khramov:

I'll move it as the species gets databased.

31.05.2012 10:02, Olga Averyanova: This species is identified correctly.

30.05.2012 14:27, Peter Khramov:

Bleh! Any versions for "uncertain" at least?

30.05.2012 14:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pontia edusa.

30.05.2012 14:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why, it actually might be there. You can't say surely without some attributes not seen on photo.

30.05.2012 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Guys, let's everybody calm down. If there is no Neptis in Malaysia, shan't we just take it peacefully?

30.05.2012 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Yury, it's the same at the moment. Albeit time went by, not all of the Russian species have been databased by now. Good news is that things keep moving and soon all the stuff will be put in order.

30.05.2012 13:00, Peter Khramov:

The species will be moved right after it gets databased.

30.05.2012 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Move it once the species gets databased.

30.05.2012 12:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males "identified successfully".

30.05.2012 10:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

25.05.2012, Yury Karpov:
I looked right into its eyes.

Well, your ophthalmology skills seem to be bad support. You'd rather read something on Neptis.

29.05.2012 12:52, Lev Bely:


The New Zealand’s largest independent conservation organisation Forest & Bird calls for help to name a newly discovered moth.
This striped moth was found on the Denniston Plateau in March and still lacks a name. It was discovered during the 3-day Forest & Bird BioBlitz aimed at exploring the West Coast's ecosystem.
Australian company Bathurst Resources started mine development works on the Denniston Plateau last September and Forest & Bird is going to stop it through protesting in the Environment Court.
This moth flying low and fast belongs to Arctesthes genus, has bright orange hind wings and a 24mm wingspan. It needs both binomial and a common name.
Forest & Bird say that the name might not be closely related to wings pattern since butterflies and moths are often named after fictional characters, animals or places. “We‘d like this moth to be launched into the public consciousness with a name that tells its story, or hints at its character or physical beauty.”

Offer your name for the Denniston moth on the Forest & Bird website competition page: http://www.forestandbird.org.nz/what-we-do/campaigns/save-the-denniston-plateauours-not-mine/moth-naming-competition. The last day to apply is June 1st. The winner gets “A Photographic Guide to Insects of New Zealand” by Brian Parkinson with photographs by Don Horne from New Holland Press.
3news.co.nz, http://www.3news.co.nz
Photo 1: the Denniston moth, http://www.3news.co.nz
Photo 2: “A Photographic Guide to Insects of New Zealand”, http://www.forestandbird.org.nz
Forest & Bird on saving the Denniston Plateau's wildlife

29.05.2012 2:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, hello! I've got some questions to ask. There are three images held at my personal account for already lots of time somehow not been moved yet, can't understand why not.
Also: certain already moved images are still named as "undetermined" though some of them are actually identified by experts from Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS, such as E. Belyaev and M. Ponomarenko.
Petr, I recall also you said some time ago that some Far Eastern species would be moved in at least 2—3 weeks. They've successfully passed and nothing changed...
... or something goes wrong?
All the best,
Yura

29.05.2012 1:47, Yuri Semejkin:

Tortricidae family, Cnephasiini kawabeia razowskii tribe (Kawabe). Identified by Margarita Ponomarenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

29.05.2012 1:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Nemophora cf staudingella (Christoph). Identified by Margarita Ponomarenko, Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

28.05.2012 7:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, he is with us, but for the most part in the south of the region. Was Beloomut (near the border with the Ryazan region.) A couple of weeks ago, it has seen enough there in abundance in the gardens. And here, close to the capital of a swallowtail always comes to me, alas.

28.05.2012 0:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! I can not believe that you really Podalirius such a rarity. This species adapts perfectly in cities - would Rosaceae! Couples enough public gardens!

27.05.2012 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

One more male.

26.05.2012 21:37, Lev Bely:

Today the one eager to wrestle the moth is a lizard (see pt. 1 and 2. Bet on the moth's win, and you won't lose. The perfect one — mighty and powerful, neither superhero nor supermachine, just an ordinary Sphingidae. Hit but staying alive!

26.05.2012 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, as I know they actually don't come to any light. These are exceptionally diurnal. I usually meet males on wet forest paths while females prefer to stay close to tree crowns. Talk seems to appear the kind of banter :)

26.05.2012 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guys, I'm afraid to write to the forum, but I have seen today, it would seem! Podalirius! near his home. Oh, its something with Swallowtail not confused. This is how: go drink a beer next to the house. I'm in touch: about 10 km. from Moscow! Tomorrow I will come in themselves and still try to put surveillance on the forum.

26.05.2012 20:05, Maxim Schwarz:

Yeah, nearly.))) So it came to the light of a mercury vapor lamp, didn't it?))))

26.05.2012 20:01, Lev Bely:


Entomologist for Moscow Butterfly House
Moscow Butterfly House has an open Entomologist vacancy. He/she is expected to care of the House's insects such as spiders, bugs, lizards, cockroaches and others. The position implies 12 4-hour working days per month.
Required: 2-year or longer work-experience. Age limited 20—50. Full-time job, flexible schedule, 15000 roubles month salary. The Entomologist will work right in Moscow Butterfly House: Russia, Moscow, near VDNKh metro station, in the All-Russia Exhibition Centre area, pavilion 2.
Please, get in touch: +7 (495) 988-89-43, dom_babochek@mail.ru.
Zoologist/Entomologist for The Pest Management Institution (non-governmental, scientific and educational organization)
The non-governmental, scientific and educational organization “Pest Management Institution” located in L'vovsky (Russia, Moscow region, Podol'sky district) invites Zoologist/Entomologist to keep vivarium and insectarium. The candidate may prepare a Ph.D thesis based on the current work.
Daily 8—17 full-time job, formal employment (paid holidays, sickness leave). The Zoologist/Entomologist will work in the Pest Management Institution area in L'vovsky, 9 Metallurgov ave.
Contact: Egorova Lyudmila Viktorovna, +7 (495) 333-07-28, kadry@rat-info.ru.
Graduate Research Assistantships (MS or PhD) for Auburn University (USA, Alabama)
Auburn University Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology opens Graduate Research Assistantship (MS or PhD) position. Up to three assistantships available.

Potential topic areas include:


Chemical mediated insect-plant and tritrophic interactions;
Neurobiology and molecular mechanisms of olfaction, and
IPM and biological control.


Start Fall 2012 or Spring 2013. Stipend: ~$16,000/year plus tuition waiver and health benefits.
Contact: Dr. Henry Fadamiro, 301 Funchess Hall, Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, AL 36849. Phone: (8-10-1) 334-844-5098, fadamhy@auburn.edu.
To learn more about Dr. Fadamiro’s research, visit http://www.ag.auburn.edu/enpl/directory/faculty/fadamiro.
Job.ru, http://www.job.ru, Job-MO.ru, http://www.job-mo.ru, The Entomological Society of America (ESA), http://www.entsoc.org
Photo: Papilio machaon pupae

26.05.2012 16:17, Lev Bely:



The Butterfly House The Panhandle Butterfly House in Florida, USA, 24 May opened the new season. Butterflies are in abundance, but the guides do not suffice. Volunteers are needed to conduct tours and educational programs for visitors to the House of butterflies.

«Today we have only half of the tour guides, and for the normal operation of the House of butterflies need twice as much." - Says Peggy Gray, chairman of the House of butterflies, one week before the opening of the new season.

This year, the opening of the Butterfly House was adjourned, and all because of the lack of hands: it took time to find and train people.In mid-May the work was ready to begin 8 out of 10 people, while the need for about 20 guides.

«The main building and the gardens are ready to receive visitors. - Says Gray. - We just need a little more than people who are happy to pay a little attention to guests and tell them about the butterflies. "

The Butterfly House in Florida was inaugurated in 1997 with the participation of the Chamber of Commerce of Navarre (FL) and "professional gardeners Florida» (Florida Master Gardeners), as well as other business and non-profit communities. Last year, the Butterfly House was visited by 15,000 people from 46 states and 15 countries.

Guides show visitors a vivarium with butterflies, share interesting facts about the species and habitats, fodder plants and butterflies life in nature. Lecturers attend mandatory training sessions where they are taught how to present information and to talk about butterflies.

«Most of the educational programs that are guides, held in a vivarium or outside, at the stands with butterflies." - Says Gray.

All the butterflies here - local."We have collected only those butterflies, which can be seen in these places that the children who come to our house, could visit us when to look for them in nature or in the yard of his home».

Life Butterfly House is largely supported by volunteers, sponsors and guides. "We've got a lot of fun - said Gray.- People working here and get great pleasure ».

16-year-old Corrine Pereira in his spare time from school happy to help House of butterflies. In addition to her three other guides here-school students who work as volunteers in the summer. "I've been here a few times and I really liked butterflies. - Corrine says.- That's cool! Butterflies incredible, and the children who come here, too. They are all very quickly grasp ».

According to the materials The Pensacola News Journal, http://www.pnj.com

Photo: Garden Butterfly House Panhandle Butterfly House, http: //www.panhandlebutterflyhouse.org

Butterflies of North Florida:
sailboat kresfontesPapilio cresphontes(The Giant Swallowtail)
monarch butterflyDanaus plexippus(The Monarch butterfly)
NymphalidaeLimenitis arthemis(The Red-spotted Purple)
black swallowtailPapilio polyxenes(The Black Swallowtail)
copper-butterflyStrymon melinus(The Gray Hairstreak)
NymphalidaeAgraulis vanillae(The Gulf Fritillary)
sailboat GlaucusPapilio glaucus(The Eastern Tiger Swallowtail)
NymphalidaeEuptoieta claudia(The Variegated Fritillary)
pieridEurema nicippe(The Sleepy Orange)
pieridPhoebis sennae(The Cloudless Sulphur)
NymphalidaeJunonia coenia(The Common Buckeye)



26.05.2012 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oops, I seem to have erred since there is actually S. planus caterpillar that can't be supposed as an apposite one.

26.05.2012 11:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is also S. planus, not sure though how its caterpillar looks like.....

26.05.2012 10:24, Igor Sakhno:

One of three possible: S.ocellatus; S.caecus; S. kindermanni.

26.05.2012 0:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.05.2012 0:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Female.

26.05.2012 0:52, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

26.05.2012 0:51, Peter Khramov:

Heliconius melpomene?

26.05.2012 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Seems (looking at the author's note) that the author of this shot already identified it himself, yet it's not quite clear. So far it's Alexandr Zhakov then.

26.05.2012 0:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Siona lineata.

26.05.2012 0:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coenonympha pamphilus.

25.05.2012 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to L. quercus.

25.05.2012 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. quercus.

25.05.2012 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to L. quercus.

25.05.2012 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. quercus.

25.05.2012 15:22, Yuriy Karpov:

I looked right into its eyes.

25.05.2012 8:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lasiocampa quercus.

25.05.2012 8:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lasiocampa quercus.

25.05.2012 8:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lasiocampa quercus.

25.05.2012 8:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lasiocampa quercus.

24.05.2012 22:20, Peter Khramov:

Goes to L. phlaeas.

24.05.2012 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Goes to C. lunula.

24.05.2012 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. lunula.

24.05.2012 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Goes to C. lunula.

24.05.2012 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. lunula.

24.05.2012 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Goes to C. lunula.

24.05.2012 22:18, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

24.05.2012 22:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.05.2012 22:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

24.05.2012 22:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.05.2012 22:16, Peter Khramov:

I said that Neptis would rather end with sappho than anything else. So "how come?" doesn't come... ;--)

24.05.2012 22:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What do you actually mean???

24.05.2012 22:00, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, decent folks should know nothing but Neptis sappho only!

24.05.2012 21:07, Lev Bely:


The Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife is to teach state residents how to identify butterflies. Everyone is welcome to join a special butterfly identification training that starts off this June. Those who will take part are also supposed to contribute to the statewide butterfly survey.
There are actually at least 120 butterfly species in Maine, but, as spokesman Doug Rafferty says, the state has only a rudimentary knowledge of them compared to neighboring states and provinces, including Vermont, Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Brunswick, which have compiled butterfly atlases.
Phillip deMaynadier, a state wildlife biologist, hopes that after this training at Colby College in Waterville in which he himself is engaged as a volunteer trainer, people in their turn could help the major annual survey.
DeMaynadier says that the point is to unite both volunteers' help and the efforts of more than 100 citizen scientists to get survey more profound and with most accurate data possible.
The Morning Sentinel, http://www.onlinesentinel.com
Photo: Danaus plexippus butterfly is feeding on a verbena flower in some garden in Portland (Maine), Jack Milton, http://www.onlinesentinel.com
Danaus plexippus butterflies are having a rest on Prout's Neck peninsula (Maine) in the course of southward migration

24.05.2012 19:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena phlaeas.

24.05.2012 19:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena phlaeas.

24.05.2012 19:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena phlaeas.

24.05.2012 19:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Colocasia coryli.

24.05.2012 18:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calophasia lunula.

24.05.2012 18:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calophasia lunula.

24.05.2012 18:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calophasia lunula.

24.05.2012 18:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calophasia lunula.

24.05.2012 18:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calophasia lunula.

24.05.2012 18:42, Stan Korb:

Identified by O. Pekarsky.

24.05.2012 14:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How come you identified it as Neptis sappho?

24.05.2012 11:53, Yuriy Karpov:

Lycaena phlaeas.

23.05.2012 23:31, Maria Pozdnova:

Polia nebulosa maybe?

23.05.2012 16:50, Peter Khramov:

I'll move it to Anumeta fractistrigata as the species gets databased.

23.05.2012 16:45, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, isn't it the same Euclidia munita likely to be wrongly moved to "undetermined" while being uploaded?

23.05.2012 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Lepidoptera.pro user Stan Korb just added on the website Eremohadena oxybela shots which actually appear to be the first photos of the species online and there are no but a few collected specimens known as well. See Eremohadena oxybela upperside and the underside.

22.05.2012 16:01, Lev Bely:


Look back: your own home may host not only inobnoxious moths but also an insect drone watching you. Here it goes, latest Israel's indoor surveillance project — a small “butterfly” that weighs just 20 grams, a unique and perfect spy which has no peer in doing its job well and, the core thing, imperceptible.
The spy can take color photos, take off vertically and hover in the air as helicopter, Israel Hayom newspaper reports. World's largest aerospace and aviation manufacturer Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) says this may come in handy in ground clashes, when a soldier would merely take it out of a pocket and send behind the enemy’s line.
The flying spy that equipped with a 0,15-gram camera and a memory card is controlled from a distance with a special helmet. This helmet allows one to see right as you were inside a butterfly watching anything it can watch in real time.
“The butterfly’s advantage is its ability to fly in an enclosed environment. There is no other aerial vehicle that can do that today,” Dubi Binyamini, head of IAI mini-robotics department told Israel Hayom.
Nearly any place could be surveyed with this spy — from railway stations and airports to office buildings, frontlines and even southern Lebanon deep forests where, as Israel believes, Hezbollah squads hide in ambush.
A translucent butterfly looking like an overgrown moth is still smaller than some other butterflies; it as well doesn't reveal itself with noiseless wings that flutter 14 times per second.
This is a typical “biomimicry” case when technology follows nature through copying it straightly. The Israeli insect did confuse nature: at 50-meter height where the device was tested, birds and insects tried following it to make a flock or swarm.
IAI needs two more years to accomplish the project. This butterfly spy seems to be one in a row of drones being reduced in size: while the recent “Ghost” city observation model weighs 4kg, the similar “Mosquito” does just about 500 grams.
The insect drone is to bring “a real technological revolution” for militaries as the developer predicts, still it's curious how it could be used in normal everyday life. Meanwhile, the police already pointed on it since secret services apparently have such an intolerable lack of this kind of accessorize.
RT, http://www.rt.com
Photo: a spy butterfly, http://www.israelhayom.co.il

21.05.2012 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Up to now you all could experience such annoying thing as comment doubles in case if you happened to refresh the same page right after you'd commented anything. So you got twin comments. Now it's fixed and you are free to reload pages after you just left a comment on community subjs, species or photos, and your own subject as well. If your browser asks to confirm the duplicate submission, please go do.

20.05.2012 22:18, Peter Khramov:

It's clear. I mean, in this window autosubstitution same conclusion. And with their links to the patches and were normal, there was no error. A mistake could only be if you do not you come with substitutions on the page, and from the search results. So I asked what for results page when there autosubstitution ...

20.05.2012 18:50, Evgeny Komarov:

On the search page came as a normal user, ie, check - whether this particular view of the database, ie introduced the name in the search box :)

20.05.2012 15:24, Peter Khramov:

Bugs will fly. By the way, how did you do on the search page was, autosubstitution not to substitute or do you just hit Enter in the search box? As for the new species - not before and close up all blue of the site. And so swell figuring out which system which is right and what is not ... And foty such views still loads, they are not sour.Once Sineva Dokin so attached to their own species. It is now nearly a hundred of fot this glorious event waiting.

20.05.2012 15:20, Peter Khramov:

Some former URLs containing additional hyphens e.g. http://lepidoptera.pro/species/polygonia-c-album for Polygonia c-album species, could be redirected wrongly (from the Polygonia c-album URL mentioned you should've been moved to http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/8617). Now cured.

20.05.2012 13:28, Evgeny Komarov:

By the way! When a species not found in the database, you can add? Then here's another scoop filmed, which is not in the database.

20.05.2012 13:26, Evgeny Komarov:

I then ship hell of a lot of species and, in passing, glyuchki catch :)

20.05.2012 13:24, Evgeny Komarov:

This link works fine!

20.05.2012 13:22, Evgeny Komarov:

And here's another: Xestia c-nigrum is through search, but there is a link does not work - go to the page of the form only of a kind!

20.05.2012 13:21, Peter Khramov:

Evegny, say, that such a reference in your work http://lepidoptera.ru/species/lacanobia-aliena?

20.05.2012 10:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Here on this page does not work http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/7543 link to Lacanobia w-latinum (Hufnagel, 1766) of "Other Lacanobia"! Maybe it's just me, but check.

19.05.2012 21:41, Lev Bely:


BASF: Research Station Entomologist for the Agricultural Research Station in Dinuba, California
BASF SE is the largest chemical company in the world headquartered in Germany. The BASF Group comprises subsidiaries and joint ventures in more than 80 countries and operates six integrated production sites and 390 other production sites in Europe, Asia, Australia, Americas and Africa. Its headquarters is located in Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Rhineland-Palatinate), Germany.
The Agricultural Research Station in Dinuba, California has an opening for a Research Station Entomologist effective immediately. The Research Station Entomologist will be responsible for designing and conducting the research and development program for the evaluation of new insecticides under California conditions. This includes:


the testing of new experimental and development compounds in field, greenhouse;
lab trials in a wide variety of agricultural and horticultural crops for the control of economically important plant pests.


The Entomologist will summarize and interpret the results in reports and presentations, and will make suggestions for further development. The Entomologist will work in a team with an assistant and will be supported by the field crew.
Required skills:


Ph.D. or Masters degree in agriculture, horticulture or biology with emphasis on entomology and pest control;
experience with major agricultural and horticultural crops;
experience in trial techniques for insecticide trials under field and greenhouse conditions;
computer skills with basic knowledge of biometrical and statistical methods for trial evaluation.


Apply here: http://jobs.basf.us/job/Dinuba-Entomologist-Job-CA-93618/1863608.
Agricultural Entomologist for Astrakhan State University
Astrakhan State University for The Caspian Scientific Research Institute of Arid Agriculture of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences has an opening for an Agricultural Entomologist.
Required skills: Masters degree in Entomology. Full-time job, housing provided, salary is up to 12000 roubles per month.
Please, get in touch: Russia, Astrakhanskaya oblast, Chernoyarsky district, Solyonoye Zaimische village, Severny block, 8 bld. The Caspian Scientific Research Institute of Arid Agriculture of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Deputy Dean (Academic Affairs), Candidate of Geographic Sciences Bondarenko Anastasiya Nikolaevna. +7 (851-49) 25-4-39, +7 (851-49) 25-7-20 (fax), pniiaz@mail.ru.
Assistant Professor of Entomology for The Louisiana State University Agricultural Center
Tenure track position (85% Extension, 15% teaching) in the Department of Entomology, Baton Rouge, LA. State-wide responsibilities include the development and implementation of research based educational and extension programs related to public and animal health, pastures, honey bees and other areas as necessary. Ph.D. in Entomology with the ability to communicate effectively with both adult and youth audiences using written and oral skills.
Applicants must demonstrate the ability to establish extension demonstration and research plots and to analyze and interpret data using statistical techniques. Procurement of extramural support through grants, industry or commodities is expected.
Apply here (position 006116): https://lsusystemcareers.lsu.edu/applicants/jsp/shared/frameset/Frameset.jsp?time=1337447812092.
Entomological Society of America, http://entsoc.org/listjobs, Future Today, http://www.futuretoday.ru
Photo: Idea leuconoe pupae

19.05.2012 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok, Petr, that's worth doing indeed to have it near at hand when identifying.

18.05.2012 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Do not: later he went just .. There was still dofiga when I left.
Et a tricky bug: now he is, and tomorrow netuti it.
The main point to catch.

18.05.2012 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Most flight of most Flight. Buprestids dragged all, that's a colleague and did not get; -)

18.05.2012 21:59, Peter Khramov:

Thanks. The photo goes to C. hirsuta.

18.05.2012 21:47, Vlad Proklov:

Canephora hirsuta and Psyche ?casta.

18.05.2012 21:27, Peter Khramov:

;--)

18.05.2012 21:26, Peter Khramov:

Let's wait for Vlad's opinion...

18.05.2012 21:25, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

18.05.2012 21:24, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

18.05.2012 21:23, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, I put your wish to have the "First aid kit" subj fixed somewhere on the top in the to-do list. As it's done, I'll move this one there too.

18.05.2012 20:28, Alex Dumchus:

I'm definitely not a pro, but can suggest one of Perrhybris or Dismorphia (looking at the photo I recalled an illustration of the old "Animal life" series published in 1969, volume 3, page 193).

18.05.2012 20:06, Alex Dumchus:

www.samuibutterflies.com.

18.05.2012 16:43, Lev Bely:


More than 70 scientists from 9 institutions including The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, sequenced the genome of the Postman butterfly (Heliconius melpomene), a favorite one among collectors and researchers since the very Victorian times. The study results were published in the reputed “Nature” journal.
Panama's Heliconius melpomene genome explains the incredible variety of tropical butterflies colors and patterns. Butterflies of Heliconius genus are of loathsome taste and predators are aware of that thank to insects' bright colors. So did some other species eventually copy their wing patterns. The question is, how?
While exploring the genome sequence, researchers found out that different butterfly species copied wing patterns by exchanging genes what actually happened very rare, especially in animals. Some wild species could crossbreed but their offspring is often non-reproductive. Hybrids happen to get useful genes that help them to adapt to changing conditions, so Heliconius hybrids gain more apposite wing patterns that increase their survival rates.
Kanchon Dasmahapatra, the lead author of the study and a former Smithsonian fellow who worked with Jim Mallet at University College London, notes: “What we discovered is that one butterfly species can gain its protective colour pattern genes ready-made from a different species by hybridizing with it — a much faster process than having to evolve one’s colour patterns from scratch.”
Few more genes in the sequence also surprised researchers. Butterflies of this genus have been always considered as “visual” insects, yet they appear to have a rich array of genes for smelling and sensing chemicals in their environment, what may indicate some connection between perception and the origins of new species. The analysis carried out at the University of California by co-author Adriana Briscoe, showed that butterflies in fact have a wider array of genes responding to chemical communication than moths, who are led by chemical signals for finding partners to mate and host plants.
This study starts off a new period in genome biology whilst it's also a headway for the Smithsonian Institute to a better understanding of the world's biodiversity and ways of its saving. Nowadays low-cost genetic sequencing allows researchers to work in small groups or even individually, and to sequence entire genomes what's formerly been barely possible but in major labs supported by government funds.
“Assembling a genome from scratch is still hard work: think Humpy-Dumpty,” said Owen McMillan, geneticist and Academic Dean at the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, “but it is getting easy, inexpensive, and is transforming how we do science. At the core, having a reference genome opens up new research possibilities and reveals previously unimagined connections”.
Smithsonian Science, http://smithsonianscience.org
Photo: a part of the Heliconius melpomene wing, Mathieu Joron, http://www.eurekalert.org
Heliconius melpomene male courting a female

18.05.2012 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes clear the way AJ :) Elez seeing my report with Zlatko Offline broke back in the next day with an overnight stay and took only 5 copies. I scored 14 pieces per minute 20. Looks to the most crash hit. Lucky shorter scale.

18.05.2012 12:20, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and I joke about the beetles something of itself)

18.05.2012 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, turns out to be one since it has a wide ribbon. Though I've never seen females sitting that close to the ground, they usually prefer tree crowns.

18.05.2012 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something seen on the wrong foot, I stood up to apologize. Some assholes on the forum of a conclusion. A butterfly really have some similarities. Simply usual we maera is not flying.

18.05.2012 9:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio polytes ledebouria male.

18.05.2012 9:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasiliy Feoktistov:
Perhaps withLasiommata maera, which now has not yet putaesh flies: they are quite similar.
Vasiliy- this a joke ???

18.05.2012 5:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's the very Phalera bucephala 100% sure.

18.05.2012 4:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, I do not know how common it is. Just a man drove her almost to the border of Moscow and Ryazan regions, at a specific point: it is local we have a very. Well, I went for companyAbout. Perhaps withLasiommata maera, which now has not yet putaesh flies: they are quite similar.Peter, there especially except Swallowtail and traditional hawk moths: skabiozovogo, podmarennikovogo and pine and take something there was no one in particular. But to collect a series of large pine borers for me is really important. In my edges it does not exist: all the logs in the district clambered and could not find a single time.She larva develops from three to six years, and the logs we simply do not belong in the woods so long.

18.05.2012 2:15, Maria Pozdnova:

Vitaly Gumenyuk's 7035 photo seems to show the same specimen.

18.05.2012 2:03, Maria Pozdnova:

Looks similar to Phalera bucephala.

18.05.2012 1:30, Maria Pozdnova:

The note should've been probably applied to another shot, what's done is done anyway... This moth has kind of a 1/3 wing size feather on its nape like one bird-of-paradise does that's fluttered in the wind in waves, pretty stunning to see :)

18.05.2012 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Albeit the photo is quite good in its gloomy way, it's definitely inferior to the author's note ;--)

18.05.2012 0:17, Peter Khramov:

The new series is amazing in full, both objects and backgrounds.

17.05.2012 22:47, Peter Khramov:

"The focus is on the beetles' - it's you, of course, nothing ...

17.05.2012 22:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexander, thank you! It is clear and easy to understand! There was a question only Orthosia opima.
Basil! Lasiommata petropolitana usual kind butterfly. I took it and in Vladimir, and in our area.

17.05.2012 21:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guys, can congratulate: Now raspravke is the first instance in the lifeLasiommata petropolitanaof MO When raspravilki take off, be sure to lay out from two angles (for the first time caught). Yesterday it was possible to take more, but the emphasis is on beetles.

17.05.2012 15:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alexandr! I unluckily have no Papilio polytes ledebouria female only male so can't compare. You should've seen its females in Thailand, Papilio polytes romulus subspecies [Cramer, 1775]. As the photo was not signed, I identified it as polytes and even now I'm sure of that it's a polytes female. As for the Papilio alphenor, the article is to be looked up.

17.05.2012 15:36, Igor Sakhno:

Isn't that a female?

17.05.2012 15:28, Alex Dumchus:

Dmitry, thanks for the elaboration. That's right, it's named at mine a swallowtail from the Philippines. I've got as well a male marked as p.lederouria from the Philippines again (the photo is attached). I happened to meet common P.polytes in Thailand, there are photos on the website that I made with it sitting on elephant biggies.

16.05.2012 22:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'll try to clear the situation. Papilio alphenor Cramer, [1776]; is described as a species, http://www.archive.org/stream/deuitlandschekap11779cram#page/n381/mode/1up, then it's noted as a subspecies of Papilio polytes alphenor ; Rothschild, 1895, http://www.archive.org/stream/novitateszoologi02lond#page/351/mode/1up, also there is such a thing like Papilio alphenor ; Vane-Wright & de Jong, 2003, couldn't find the article though, can't say where it was described as a species, but it was done as a subspecies from the Philippines.

Papilio ledebouria Eschscholtz, 1821, is described from the Philippines.
Papilio polytes alphenor ; Rothschild, 1895, the same article, turns into a subspecies of Papilio polytes ledebouria ; Page & Treadaway, 2003.
So. It requires to find the description from Vane-Wright & de Jong, 2003, and to check out what's species based upon. Also to know the exact location of where it was caught (this is a female 100% sure). If females genitalia differ, you need to cut it.

16.05.2012 21:56, Lev Bely:


Approximately 300 million red admiral (Vanessa atalanta) butterflies moved from Windsor (Canada, Ontario) to New Brunswick. Such a massive butterfly migration through Eastern Canada was caused by the unusually warm winter in North America. This will surely have some further consequences for other species too.
“It's probably the most exciting year for butterflies that Canada has ever seen,” said Jeremy Kerr, a professor of biology at the University of Ottawa.
Field observation results estimate about 300 million red admiral butterflies migrated from Windsor to New Brunswick what's 10 times more than in previous years. Kerr said that other species also arrived or appeared in greater numbers.
The “butterfly boom” is likely to have happened due to the abnormal warm weather last winter throughout North America. Higher temperatures made overwintering butterflies emerge sooner in some places like Texas and Florida. It also improved their survival rates as they went forward north at once.
First Canadian butterflies of those that overwinter here were noticed in March that is “damned peculiar” as Kerr said. In the mid-April southern Ontario was hit by a big wave of migrant butterflies that in part were brought with strong winds. Red admiral butterflies moved north so early that they flew even into the snowy areas what usually doesn't happen. Red admirals were also joined by the Painted lady butterflies that belong to Vanessa genus as well.
A second butterfly wave arrived at the beginning of May and diversified southern Ontario, especially from Windsor to Toronto, with other species. Kerr said one enthusiast recorded 22 different species in a single Windsor park. The blog of the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto reports about few species appeared there such as the American Painted Lady (Vanessa virginiensis), the Question Mark (Polygonia interrogationis), the Mourning Cloak (Nymphalis antiopa), the Cloudless Sulphur (Phoebis sennae), the Gray Hairstreak (Strymon melinus), the Variegated Fritillary (Euptoieta claudia) and the American snout (Libytheana carinenta).
Felix Sperling, a biologist at the University of Alberta, said the early and large migration has been a strictly eastern phenomenon, save for some red admirals approaching the southern border of Manitoba. He said the red admiral is known to have surges — and years where they're no-shows — but in Western Canada they tend to have their own ebbs and flows in numbers.
Kerr said the butterflies won't have any immediate effect on their environment — the bigger question is what it might mean for other animals. Butterflies are excellent indicators of environmental changes. “Is it a really beautiful sign of something really worrying to come?”
Sperling and Kerr both admit that it's barely possible to find out exact causes of these changes. “We don't know yet which species are going to be winners and which are going to be losers in this time of rapid environmental change,” Kerr said.
Yet there are two questions to be bothered with. How will the monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) migration come about as it's expected in early to mid-June and what will be the second red admiral generation that is to be started this summer.
CBC/Radio-Canada, http://www.cbc.ca
Photo: the Red Admiral butterfly
Vanessa atalanta

16.05.2012 21:36, Alex Dumchus:

Petr, I got it named like this. Go google P.alphenor and you'll see lots of it. I'm not an entomologist but there is such a mess with all these species and subspecies names! Podalirius, for instance, has been counted as of the Papilio genus till the very end (maybe even later) of 80's!

16.05.2012 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, goes to "uncertain" so far.

16.05.2012 15:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm not sure of Southern Kazakhstan, but it would be Lycaena thersamon in Europe.

16.05.2012 15:25, Peter Khramov:

Wait, is it impossible indeed to identify it for anyway?

16.05.2012 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

16.05.2012 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dmitry replied to the post office.

16.05.2012 8:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio polytes female.

16.05.2012 8:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

16.05.2012 8:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I want to learn to identify himself Orthosia.

16.05.2012 0:28, Maxim Schwarz:

Cool! I also happen to shoot butterflies in Khar'kov at times!:-)

15.05.2012 22:36, Peter Khramov:

What's this species name, Papilio alphenor?

15.05.2012 21:17, Lev Bely:

Olga, Lepidoptera facebook account is sure to be some day, so far join us in Twitter, it's already got quite interesting people and stuff updated daily. Vasily, spam is a true disaster and pretty annoying, worth using some filters or whatever of the kind. Today I've got myself few facebook spam mails to different mailboxes though I've got no account there. However, with all these personal woes we can't boycott facebook as well as other social networks if we speak about Lepidoptera global communication.

15.05.2012 19:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, right. This stuff goes to the spam at mine. Still there are really lots of.

15.05.2012 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Anyway, it's not such a drag. If way too annoying, you can use spam filters.

15.05.2012 19:05, Olga Averyanova:

Yes, facebook practises people search by your email contacts.

15.05.2012 18:28, Peter Khramov:

An interesting option ...

15.05.2012 18:16, Peter Khramov:

Wonder too what's the source of the facebook spam mails? I receive such to my lepidoptera email albeit I have no any facebook account. Or just people export their contacts with email addresses to facebook?

15.05.2012 17:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

A number with the letter "a" added at the last moment. Already it was probably difficult to change the numbering of all families. It is my speculation. :)

15.05.2012 17:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

And what Orthosia problem? It seems everything is defined.

15.05.2012 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ewww, facebook....... Please, no, since it's such an annoying thing that sends spam mails, hate it. Whatever settings you would use, it keeps sending you anything, suckers. I receive any nonsense, no matter whether I need it or not, already got tired of the mailbox cleaning.

15.05.2012 14:01, Olga Averyanova:

Good for you, keep it up! What about facebook? Though butterflies seem not to be blooming there...

15.05.2012 1:17, Peter Khramov:

People who knows the thread, which means that, when the blue of the catalog number of the form is the letter but in the end? Example - 1683a.

15.05.2012 1:16, Peter Khramov:

Those ants behaved like country pooches, surrounded that jewel Dalceridae and yapping, yapping...

15.05.2012 0:41, Lev Bely:

Ants thought the same before trying:)

14.05.2012 23:57, Peter Khramov:

Funniest thing.

14.05.2012 22:32, Lev Bely:


Lately the web was charmed with photos of the amazing jewel caterpillar looking like a juicy, translucent, gelatinous gummy bear. One to be blamed is Gerardo Aizpuru, a scuba instructor and amateur wildlife photographer, who shot this caterpillar on a mangrove tree leaf near Cancun, Mexico. He uploaded the pictures on the Project Noah website, a wild nature photos user-created database, where users identified the caterpillar as Acraga coa moth of Dalceridae family.
Hard to say whether Aizpuru's caterpillar is Acraga coa indeed, but it's likely to belong to Dalceridae family. There are already 84 species identified within the family where larvae are also called “slug caterpillars” as they are really gooey. If you browse pictures of Dalceridae caterpillars, you'll see that all of them yet variously colored and have different patterns, look like a plumpy gelatinous ball covered with gumdrop spines. Though Dalceridae caterpillars are colored as bright as many of poisonous caterpillars and other animals whose aggressive colors meant to put predators off, yet they have not been noticed to be whatsoever toxic or something of the kind. Daniel Janzen, a biologist at the University of Pennsylvania who would raise Dalceridae in artificial conditions, says that although the larvae tend to be bright and conspicuous and spend a lot of time walking on the tops of leaves — as though they did not fear birds and other predators — he has no evidence that Dalceridae are poisonous and he knows that they do not sting, unlike some of their cousins.

Biologists however tend not to consider those gumdrop spines just decorative things. They noticed that the cones could fall off caterpillars very easily like one may split them off either they could be even accidentally knocked off by an awkward hand movement. Looks similar to lizard demeanor when it throws off its tail as a kind of “bribe” giving to predators. Janzen says this trick might help the larvae escape from hungry insects and birds, but researchers have not yet confirmed this.
Marc Epstein, an insect biosystematist at the California Department of Food & Agriculture, and his colleagues made an experiment with Dalcerides ingenita larvae and ants. They placed caterpillars in glass Petri dishes, then put there few Camponotus floridanus ants. Usually ants either eat off caterpillar or try to feed it, depends on the situation, but in Dalceridae case few of them inspected larvae with their antennas while most just backed off without trying to bite. Those who still dared to take a bite either got stuck in larvae's jelly coat or rapidly pulled away and began to clean their mandibles to get rid of that gunk. Afterwards Epstein arranged few more tests and didn't found any toxic chemicals in that gooey mass suggesting that it deters ants purely because of its stickiness.
So the jewel caterpillar perfectly justifies its name since anyone is welcome to watch but not to touch.
Scientific American, http://blogs.scientificamerican.com
Photo 1: some Dalceridae caterpillar, artour_a, http://blogs.scientificamerican.com
Photo 2: Acraga coa imago, Daniel Janzen, http://blogs.scientificamerican.com
A Dalceridae jewel caterpillar

14.05.2012 20:09, Olga Averyanova:

Meh, so that is it! Once you move it to identified I'll add mine two with description. Caterpillars oddly feed solely on plantains that are not mentioned as feed plants anywhere.

14.05.2012 20:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, would you please share those links there http://lepidoptera.pro/community/2328, if possible? Petr, what about to fix somehow this "First aid kit" subj not to look it out within the full news feed? So hard.

14.05.2012 19:59, Alex Dumchus:

Looks like Euploea crameri bremeri. Identified by websites of Thailand butterflies.

14.05.2012 18:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to be the very Asota caricae (Fabricius, 1775), http://www.boldsystems.org/index.php/Taxbrowser_Taxonpage?taxid=70279.

14.05.2012 18:15, Alex Dumchus:

Asota caricae maybe?

14.05.2012 16:39, Peter Khramov:

About 200 amendments as to species, subgenera and genera.

14.05.2012 15:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ay !!! Where are our sovochniki! Help!

14.05.2012 15:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Today I've spread one more male as well :)

14.05.2012 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry groundwork for the ill. Tuplyu himself in them. And most importantly bring down the crowd: no longer take them apart. We have got.

13.05.2012 23:19, Peter Khramov:

To add or not to add follows the upload ;--)

13.05.2012 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Caligo sp. so far.

13.05.2012 22:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Somebody on the fingers may explain the differences between species in the genus Orthosia. And then I have the whole brain and the eyes broke.

13.05.2012 20:03, Alex Dumchus:

Checked out my collection, can give you one more similar shot named P.alphenor ledebouria at mine.

13.05.2012 19:42, Alex Dumchus:

I'll show you two more P.rumanzovia rumanzovia photos. Difference is quite small.

13.05.2012 19:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Few more to add? :)

13.05.2012 18:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.05.2012 18:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.05.2012 18:32, Peter Khramov:

The model is moved.

13.05.2012 18:32, Peter Khramov:

This cute doggy moved too.

13.05.2012 18:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.05.2012 18:32, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

13.05.2012 18:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.05.2012 1:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.05.2012 0:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Papilio polytes female, tails already torn off.

12.05.2012 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Hm, I wonder why I sent the foreground thing to morpho for anyway since it seems to be the same Caligo... As for undersides, please, go do.

12.05.2012 22:53, Peter Khramov:

No upperside of this very specimen. As for the transparency, mind that it was somehow shot to the light.

12.05.2012 21:33, Alex Dumchus:

Upperside, if possible? Are wings transparent indeed?

12.05.2012 21:26, Alex Dumchus:

P.rumanzovia rumanzovia f.white.

12.05.2012 21:24, Alex Dumchus:

Seems there is a Caligo moth in the background, likely C.olieus since morpho ones have a lower "eye" placed higher and its darker itself. I can add photos of both undersides if needed.

12.05.2012 12:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Morpho polyphemus, Westwood, [1850]. It seems not to have synonyms, just subspecies.

12.05.2012 12:15, Peter Khramov:

Why it's not databased yet? Isn't it a common species? Either we've got synonyms? Though I can see no any...

12.05.2012 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that's Morpho polyphemus as well as #12645.

12.05.2012 9:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, move all those to Pterostoma palpina since there can be no variants. I've just spread such thing myself :)

12.05.2012 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I think it's very Morpho polyphemus. The underside is quite typical.

12.05.2012 7:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This butterfly definitely got more sophisticated. It was always rather ordinary thing, even urban. Yet I didn't see it last five years, now I saw it again and in the very those areas where it used to be. Nymphalis genus is actually told by many people to have changed its demeanor. The explicit example could be Nymphalis polychloros that was rather common to meet before as against Nymphalis xanthomelas. Now these two swapped places.

11.05.2012 23:48, Maxim Schwarz:

Vasily, a friend of mine works in Moscow city and watches this butterfly every spring. I guess, its total disappearance is kind of the fact quite overrated.

11.05.2012 23:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The fashion model: shot from all angles :)
This is very Pterostoma palpina.

11.05.2012 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.05.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to females.

11.05.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

One year later he's been moved to males...

11.05.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov:

This one also became male.

11.05.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Now it's male.

11.05.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females.

11.05.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

11.05.2012 23:26, Peter Khramov:

Goes to females.

11.05.2012 23:21, Peter Khramov:

Guys, let's not make shots with rulers, just notice size when adding photos.

11.05.2012 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I wonder if there is cow parsnip in the UK, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heracleum_(plant)? We've got lots of it. Once my junior brother made a musical pipe with that. Did he play that pipe............

11.05.2012 21:44, Peter Khramov:

If you notice aggressive gatherings either teen groups of the kind, please, inform Forest Research in the UK.

11.05.2012 20:21, Lev Bely:


The Olympic Games may be ruined with bad guests that are expected to be there right in time. Whilst the authorities are settling up missile weapons on the city roofs to protect (everybody) against potential terrorist attacks, the real threat may appear to be ordinary oak trees, exactly, poisonous caterpillars of oak processionary moth (Thaumetopoea processionea) that are sheltering there. Their toxic hairs when inhaled can cause dizziness and vomiting. Each caterpillar contains 63000 poisonous hairs that can provide misery to millions of spectators. These hairs also provoke asthma attacks, skin and throat rashes, watery eyes.
Thaumetopoea processionea moth was brought to the UK in 2006 with oak trees imported from Holland, and quickly spread over the territory. Albeit officials have already eradicated over 700 nests, caterpillars are expected to increase due to the last abnormally warm winter.
Tony Kirkham, head of the arboretum at The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, told that while efforts are being made, the pests are difficult to eradicate. “We use spray to keep them at bay but even the nest removals at Kew don't totally control oak processionary moths,” he said. “You can slow them down but we will never find them all. They will always keep increasing.”
Those who are about to visit the Olympics advised to stay away from caterpillars. If you notice a nest, please, inform Forest Research in the UK. If you got a rash or similar affliction, use antihistamine preparates and creams. See a doctor if you're getting worse.
NY Daily News, http://www.nydailynews.com
Photo: oak processionary moth caterpillar, Regani, http://en.wikipedia.org
Eradicating of Thaumetopoea processione nests in Holland

11.05.2012 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Female.

11.05.2012 10:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male.

11.05.2012 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male.

11.05.2012 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male.

11.05.2012 10:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Female.

11.05.2012 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male.

11.05.2012 10:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Female.

11.05.2012 9:56, Nikita Kulanov: This species is identified correctly.

10.05.2012 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks for approval, it goes to "identified successfully".

10.05.2012 21:57, Boris Stradomsky:

I think that this is very Cupido (Everes) argiades since its wings end with little brushes and edged with a moderate black fringe.

10.05.2012 21:36, Peter Khramov:

I put it then to argiades "uncertain" though we'd better hear Boris' opinion on the subj.

10.05.2012 21:14, Alexey Azizov: This species is identified correctly.

10.05.2012 18:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.05.2012 18:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved to D. mendica.

10.05.2012 18:30, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

10.05.2012 18:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.05.2012 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Diaphora mendica male.

10.05.2012 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Diaphora mendica male indeed.

10.05.2012 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Right, Diaphora mendica male.

10.05.2012 16:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, that's Diaphora mendica male.

09.05.2012 18:26, Peter Khramov:

So it gets going, ladies and gentlemen of the jury.

09.05.2012 17:48, Lev Bely:


Dear friends, now we have a Twitter account http://twitter.com/Lepidoptera_pro. There you can see the news that you commonly read on our “Community” page, important messages of website updates and stuff alike, plus retweets of some interesting news that are not going to be published on Lepidoptera.pro yet they're curious indeed. Besides, @Lepidoptera_pro will follow various entomological societies, unions, associations and others of the kind, colleges, universities and biological faculties, specialized online scientific journals and gazettes, insect museums, permanent insect exhibitions, any other similar projects having Twitter feeds, so as you may check up our Following list and choose something for a regular reading.
If you have a Twitter account, we'll be glad to see you amongst our followers, please, subscribe on http://twitter.com/Lepidoptera_pro and retweet anything you find good and worth spreading over the world. If you have no any, don't hesitate to register one and go join us. We also got there a swell cyborg fox attacked by butterflies:) Hard to resist! See you on http://twitter.com/Lepidoptera_pro.

09.05.2012 2:50, Yuri Semejkin:

This genus species can be identified precisely by genitalia only. (according to Kirpichnikova V. A.)

08.05.2012 21:31, Lev Bely:


James Pearce's love with entomology began in his childhood when he was exploring Mill Creek Canyon with a gossamer net to find butterflies. Then his interest took him to study science and medicine particularly yet he didn't quit collecting butterflies in his Salt Lake City home.
For 60 years Dr. James Pearce gathered an immense butterfly collection of 16000 specimens that were recently donated by his family to the University of Utah where Pearce had worked on the clinical faculty till his very death in 2009.
This collection has been displayed on May 9th just for one day at the Natural History Museum of Utah. Some of these butterflies were already shown in the big Collections Wall exhibit at the Rio Tinto Center, a new museum home. “The legacy of his collection is already splashed two stories tall,” said entomologist Christy Bills, the museum’s invertebrate collections manager.
James' widow Virginia tells that Pearce being terminally ill decided his collection would end up in a museum where it could be appreciated by the public and studied by scientists.
Not only Pearce practised collecting butterflies but he also co-founded the Utah Lepidopterists’ Society. He was one of the first to document the presence of the Indra Swallowtail (Papilio indra) along the Wasatch Front. “Swallowtail was his passion in terms of local butterflies. He knew where the food plants were and which mountains,” Virginia said.
Yet James Pearce was not a professional entomologist he became an expert being truly laborous as to either describing butterflies or keeping specimens in best condition for further studying. He also purchased and traded exotic tropical specimens.
Christy Bills pays special attention to that portion of Pearce's collection what contains butterflies gathered around the valley in 1950's. “His collections provide a snapshot of a portion of the valley’s ecology over the past 50 years,” she said. “Most butterflies are very specialized to what plants they use, sometimes crazy specialized. A certain butterfly indicates what plants there were at the time. We will be able to see what changes have occurred.”
Many specimens of Pearce's collection are from another amateur collector, the late Ken Tidwell. “One of the wonderful things about entomology is it’s accessible to anyone,” Bills said. “You don’t need an electron microscope to do it. Here is a busy doctor and father, and he got really good at it.”
The Salt Lake Tribune, http://www.sltrib.com
Photo: James Pearce demonstrates Morpho cypris butterflies of his collection, http://www.sltrib.com
KSL-TV on James Pearce's butterfly collection at the Natural History Museum of Utah

07.05.2012 21:56, Lev Bely:


There are still butterflies in Mumbai albeit they're increasingly getting lack of habitation space due to the growing deforestation and developing industry. So it was chosen to count the rest what resulted in the first book of butterflies of Mumbai region. “Butterflies of Mumbai” that describes 153 local species was presented on May 1st in Maharashtra Nature Park near Dharavi. The book as well tells about little-known facts of lepidoptera and consists over 400 pictures.
“British naturalists were the first ones to orally document 129 different species in the Bombay region. But the demography of the city has changed since Independence,” said Nelson Rodrigues, a nature enthusiast and the author of this book who spent six years of research to write it. He notices that lists of local species were made up even before this book but they've never been combined in one document. “In this book, I have also included three species that were recently discovered in the Mumbai region — the Abnormal Silverline (Cigaritis abnormis), the Giant Red Eye (Gangara thyrsis) and the Large Guava Blue (Virachola perse),” he said.
“I have kept the language devoid of jargon so that the book can be read by students and nature enthusiasts alike,” said Rodrigues who systematized butterflies not by families but colors.
Butterflies perform an important role in pollinating plants and they themselves are ecological indicators. “Unfortunately, their numbers are dwindling even in greener pockets of the city because of the use of pesticides and the weeding out of wild plants on which the butterflies feed or lay eggs,” said Rodrigues, adding that the Southern Birdwing (Troides minos), the biggest known butterfly in India, is not seen anymore in Mumbai.
Whilst Rodrigues plans to support people in arranging butterfly gardens near forests or villages all over Maharashtra state, he advises to those who are eager to see Mumbai butterflies to go look for them in Maharashtra Nature Park, Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Yeoor Hills in Thane or in the Vasai fort.
Daily News & Analysis, http://www.dnaindia.com
Photo: Troides minos butterfly, Vaikoovery, http://fr.wikipedia.org
Moduza procris in Maharashtra Nature Park

07.05.2012 19:36, Alexey Azizov:

I looked at a few more website photos of this butterfly and I lean to Cupido argiades.

07.05.2012 12:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caught/shot date and place: 2012-04-30 00:00:00, Ukraine, Kherson region, Tsuryupinsky district, Proletarka village.

07.05.2012 12:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Caught/shot date and place: 2012-04-30 00:00:00, Ukraine, Kherson region, Tsuryupinsky district, Proletarka village.

06.05.2012 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to selene.

06.05.2012 19:07, Yuriy Karpov:

Boloria selene.

06.05.2012 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yesterday I saw it again over here in Zheleznodorozhny town after many years (didn't pick it for a collection nor shot as I had nothing to make a photo). Yet it's still in Moscow region :) Though they said it was already not...

06.05.2012 8:26, Olga Averyanova:

:) Neither do I. Agree with you, many times I shot myself in the foot using its info of orchids.

05.05.2012 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Olga, to believe in wikipedia is kind of a big sin. Please, don't you rely upon it.

05.05.2012 20:29, Lev Bely:


The bee was always the mascot at Bradley Elementary School in Columbia, South Carolina, but last Friday it went on a small vacation. That Friday turned for a while into a butterfly day.
Few weeks ago the 2nd grade students started raising butterflies to release them in the end some time later. Veronica Draft, a 3rd—5th grade teacher working with autistic children, hopes students that participate in this project will learn a life lesson from it.
“We are all individually different, some of our butterflies came out at the beginning of the week, some came out in the middle, some just hatched this morning. We are all at different stages of life, but at the end of it we all get together to make a beautiful picture.” said Draft.
“This is how we want all of our children, not just the ones with autism, but all of the children here at Bradley, Richland One and all over to soar to success.”
WLTX, http://www.wltx.com
Photo: Bradley Elementary School students release butterflies, http://www.wltx.com
Bradley Elementary School butterflies

05.05.2012 19:48, Olga Averyanova:

Thanks, you convinced me. Here the mass flight happened in the very mid-April and specimens were colored quite variously. Sorry for doubt, I was confused with the wikipedia description, here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catopsilia_pomona where they differ a lot.

05.05.2012 15:11, Peter Khramov:

Imago stage photos lack too. In fact, we've got not lots of some. So they are needed too. To. Upload.

05.05.2012 14:17, Peter Khramov:

So what, guys, any conclusions as to the both photos?

05.05.2012 12:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thanks!

05.05.2012 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'll measure it and send you later by e-mail.

05.05.2012 11:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The exact size really needed. Please, note if it's not hard for you to. No doubt as for the species itself, I just need it for statistics.

05.05.2012 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've got no doubt as for your identifying.

05.05.2012 10:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, the size is likely the one of D. chrysippus. Unfortunately, have no label just the information though word-of-mouth that it's from Taiwan. Why, any doubt?

05.05.2012 10:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily! Would you please tell its size and, if possible, the label? By e-mail if you'd like.

05.05.2012 9:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Olga! I would kindly ask you to upload more pre-imago stage photos since there are lots of imago stage ones. As to all species.

05.05.2012 9:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Olga, Vasily, what makes you both feel doubtful? This genus shows marked sexual dimorphism as well as many Pieridae do. This is a female though you can see the male too on the other photo. In Vietnam I came across the mass flight or migration maybe of this species. I could see at that moment hundreds of flying butterflies albeit it was rather hard to catch one.

05.05.2012 3:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've just checked it out. Dmitry is right, that's female.

04.05.2012 23:52, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, would you please elaborate your last comment? I didn't understand anything...

04.05.2012 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry. Or I don't dig it and such things can happen.

04.05.2012 21:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I suppose we can rely upon Dmitry's identifying. This is likely such kind of a sexual dimorphism.

04.05.2012 21:40, Olga Averyanova:

?

04.05.2012 21:38, Olga Averyanova:

Male.

04.05.2012 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Likely there is no any. Let's wait for Boris Stradomsky who might put a dot on it.

04.05.2012 19:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Its wingspan is about 6cm (measured with a ruler). Bigger than those average I caught before. Most curious that I literally forgot its pupa that was left in the soil on a sill with no any care. Whatsoever, one morning I just saw it sitting over there!

04.05.2012 18:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

What do you mean "big"? The photo doesn't disclose its real size hence we can't rely on but Vasily's info. :)

04.05.2012 18:14, Peter Khramov:

A big one.

04.05.2012 18:13, Peter Khramov:

Un-der-side! Un-der-side! (chanting)

04.05.2012 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Polyommatus but one of three Cupido (Everes) those who fly in your neck of the woods.

04.05.2012 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of the female on #12557 photo.

04.05.2012 17:21, Peter Khramov:

The vulture goes to "identified successfully".

04.05.2012 17:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

04.05.2012 17:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

04.05.2012 17:20, Peter Khramov:

What a pokemon.

04.05.2012 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, this is Orthosia miniosa.

04.05.2012 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Right, Orthosia miniosa.

04.05.2012 10:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Orthosia miniosa indeed.

04.05.2012 9:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Orthosia miniosa.

04.05.2012 9:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia miniosa, that's right.

04.05.2012 0:21, Peter Khramov:

This photo was required in that very discussion.

03.05.2012 21:49, Lev Bely:


Winged Tapestries: Moths at Large travelling exhibition from the Canadian Museum of Nature is now at the Royal Alberta Museum (Edmonton) until September 3rd.
The fantastic beauty and amazing biodiversity of moths in the Ottawa region captured Jim des Rivières, a Canadian photographer, who enlarged them many times and got impressive prints which you can see today at the Royal Alberta Museum. Three of his works that reach nearly two meters stagger even sophisticated visitors who can enjoy exploring the minuscule details of moth body and wings.
An ordinary, wan looking moth appears to be a hidden gem of a rare beauty, something that glistens with a thousand colors and tones when seen in close. To create such stunning prints Jim des Rivières put moths on a flatbed scanner glass and made high-resolution images of 4800 dpi. His moths are blossoming with astonishing color combinations and fanciful ornaments that you could barely notice from a distance.
Now you can go stare for hours at those beautiful moths at the Royal Alberta Museum up to September 3rd. The museum is open daily from 9am to 5pm.
Royal Alberta Museum, http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca
Photo: Luna moth's (Actias luna) enlarged wing fragment, Jim des Rivières, http://www.moths.ca
Winged Tapestries: Moths at Large exhibition at the Royal Alberta Museum

02.05.2012 22:00, Lev Bely:


We obviously get more cautious when we spot a wasp, bee or spider. Better take care, anyone could prudently think. Though you may easily add to this “could-be-dangerous” list one more critter that is a bright, colorful caterpillar innocently creeping up your hibiscus tree. Be sure, its venom could bring you most severe pain.
There are four caterpillar species in South Florida having venomous spines to protect themselves from enemies' attacks. As the spring comes, they become to emerge from eggs and try to survive the next few weeks before turning into butterfly or moth.
The Florida Poison Information Center—Miami that registers all contact poisoning accidents either chemical or reptile/insect, got 227 calls from South Florida residents over the past year, all were stung by poisonous caterpillars. Statistics says that the pain such “caterpillar” victims have to suffer is extremely intense.
“It's a very painful sting,” said Dr. Jeffrey Bernstein, the center's medical director. “We even see people pass out from the pain. We don't see any deaths from it, but it is very painful, judging by the number of people that just are out-of-control hysterical when they call.”
Poisonous caterpillars include the saddleback caterpillar (Sibine stimulea), the puss caterpillar (Megalopyge opercularis), the io caterpillar (Automeris io) and the hag caterpillar (Phobetron pithecium).
Michael Stanwyck from Pompano Beach recalls that he was stung by caterpillars at least six times in his childhood, and the saddleback venom for him was quite stronger than the io. “It's like somebody lit you on fire,” he said. “A bee sting times a hundred.”
All people calling to the center are told to place a piece of scotch tape on the afflicted area and to tear it off repeatedly till all spines are extracted. In rare cases of strong allergic reactions, shortness of breath, vomiting or any other bad symptoms, you are insistently advised to go to the hospital or call the ambulance.
In some sense caterpillars are even worth empathy since they just do their best to deter predators' attacks — birds, lizards, to name but a few. “If you're a caterpillar, you have a very challenging life because everything wants to eat you,” said Jaret Daniels, assistant professor of entomology at the University of Florida and assistant curator of the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera & Biodiversity. “You're out there on the plant, and you're a big, fleshy meal.”
Daniels says that “less than 2 percent of butterfly and moth larvae survive to adulthood”, therefore he appeals to people not to eliminate all of them. “Just because caterpillars can sting, it doesn't mean you should spray your garden and try to get rid of them. They're pretty cool looking. They're really attractive, interesting organisms. They're not trying to hurt you. They're doing it to avoid being eaten.”
One “beautiful” day an io caterpillar stung Tracie Terrell and her friend during their walk in Deerfield Beach. They just brushed it incidentally with hands. “It was intense burning and itching and the area turned red and swelled,” Terrell said. “The pain was comparable to a bee sting, but it was itchy, too, and spread over a larger area.” They got back and found the caterpillar who was bright green with red stripes. “I didn't have the heart to kill it even though it got us good,” she said. “Such a unique and colorful little guy.”
The hag caterpillar (Phobetron pithecium)

This caterpillar is named “hag” for its disheveled hair. It's not so common to meet comparing to others. If met, it could be rather on forest trees and ornamental shrubs.
The io caterpillar (Automeris io)

Common in South Florida. You can see it on ixora and rose plants.
The puss caterpillar (Megalopyge opercularis)

Equipped with stiff venomous spines which break off in the skin. Loves oak and citrus trees.
The saddleback caterpillar (Sibine stimulea)

Curiously colored with a brown spot in the middle looking like a saddle. Feeds on hibiscus and palm trees as well as on many others.
What to do if you're stung
Put a piece of scotch tape on the afflicted area and tear it off the skin till the spines are extracted. Apply some ice in order to soothe the pain, then a paste of baking soda and water. If you ever had hay fever, asthma or any allergic reactions, either you feel you're getting worse, call the doctor, pronto.
The Sun-Sentinel, http://articles.sun-sentinel.com
Photo of the hag caterpillar: Greg Dwyer, http://en.wikipedia.org
Photo of the io caterpillar: Michael Holroyd, http://en.wikipedia.org
Photo of the puss caterpillar: Jeffdelonge, http://en.wikipedia.org
Photo of the saddleback caterpillar: Gerald J. Lenhard, Louiana State Univ, http://en.wikipedia.org
The saddleback caterpillar

02.05.2012 21:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.05.2012 21:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

02.05.2012 19:13, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.05.2012 19:13, Peter Khramov:

Wow. You seem to be coworking with Dmitry... Moved.

02.05.2012 18:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Aglia tau female.

02.05.2012 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We've got such one already discussed.

02.05.2012 18:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pararge aegeria.

02.05.2012 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to be Cucullia blattariae.

02.05.2012 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's right.

02.05.2012 18:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I miss lots of stuff, sorry :)
Aglia tau, no doubt.

02.05.2012 18:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

02.05.2012 18:34, Peter Khramov:

As the species is not databased yet, still we've got time to name it...

02.05.2012 18:32, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" then...

02.05.2012 18:31, Peter Khramov:

The second photo: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/12551.

02.05.2012 18:29, Peter Khramov:

The upperside: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/12548.

02.05.2012 18:28, Peter Khramov:

aegeria?

02.05.2012 18:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Supposedly, Orthosia miniosa.

02.05.2012 17:53, Olga Averyanova:

:( Sorry, maybe next time. They all emerged and the empty pupae look whatever.

02.05.2012 0:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If you still own the specimen, I'd advise you to boil it then to make sure since the hind wings confuse. Yet only Euploea mulciber can have such shining forewings.

02.05.2012 0:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Skip my turn. Could be lots of.

02.05.2012 0:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

02.05.2012 0:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That was supposed right. No variants.

02.05.2012 0:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Would be cool to see its underside.

02.05.2012 0:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

01.05.2012 23:38, Peter Khramov:

Any suggestions more?..

01.05.2012 20:53, Lev Bely:

Done.

01.05.2012 19:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes on raspravke it stands now. Later loaded. Though bananas, but nice.

01.05.2012 18:11, Peter Khramov:

By the way, it would be cool to see the link to Part I.

01.05.2012 18:11, Peter Khramov:

That very predator.

01.05.2012 17:42, Peter Khramov:

Once the species gets databased, I'll move it. Meanwhile, please, confirm anybody who can...

01.05.2012 17:41, Peter Khramov:

As the exotic species database gets updated, I'll move that.

01.05.2012 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" so far since the community's keeping silence...

01.05.2012 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Amerila astreus (Drury, 1773).

01.05.2012 16:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Couldn't it be Ideopsis similis? Or something of the kind.

01.05.2012 13:59, Peter Khramov:

Basil, while you comment them otpishi just as in the new version, which right now is programmed to be able to communicate any photos of each other.

01.05.2012 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter and the two photos here can not be linked in any way? Type the two dogs? To the click from one to another perekidovalo. The fact is that last night of this http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/10193 dolls came a hefty female (in the stain). How-to unite. Or just a link in the comments indicate a doll?

30.04.2012 18:52, Peter Khramov:

The second photo: http://lepidoptera.ru/zub/hash/002.jpg. Dmitry, what do you think?

30.04.2012 15:15, Alex Dumchus:

This is Euploea mulciber male, look at the second photo.

30.04.2012 14:50, Alex Dumchus:

I think this is Cyrestis themire themire.

30.04.2012 13:22, Peter Khramov:

Svetana, if you haven't uploaded it yet, go do it. If you did but I haven't published it yet, so don't.

29.04.2012 22:48, Svetlana Karaeva:

I've got another photo of this moth wings more spread out. Its size is about 4cm (afraid to be wrong:)) Should I upload that here?

29.04.2012 22:02, Lev Bely:

Once again (see Part I there: http://lepidoptera.pro/community/8230), the small critter throws a big one staying fearless and cool-blooded. The dog was fighting with might and main, though in vain!

29.04.2012 20:08, Lev Bely:


Modern bookstores are ready to offer you a full range of whatsoever butterfly books from a thin brochure to a large heavy volume that might tell about anything but the butterflies. Yet a good home library should be rather made up of best and worth reading stuff what we're about to review right now.
British Moths & Butterflies by Chris Manley (ISBN 9 780713 686364) is an illustrated photographic guide that describes over than 1420 species including 850 macros, 74 butterflies and 500 micros. The species summary comprises wing-spans, taxonomic status, expansion, flight times, habitats and caterpillar host plants. The guide is illustrated with beautiful photos, and all alive butterflies were shot in nature. The book contents and its first pages: http://www.amazon.co.uk/British-Moths-Butterflies-Photographic-Guide/dp/0713686367.

The Colour Identification Guide to Moths of the British Isles by Bernard Skinner (ISBN 0-670-87978-9) is easy readable and informative, and includes 43 color plates of more than 1600 moths of all species, types and varieties. The second revised edition is a 192 page hardcover book: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Colour-Identification-Guide-British-Macrolepidoptera/dp/0670879789.

Best one for thoughtful reading would be Moths by E. B. Ford (ISBN 978-0-00-730821-7) in the well-known The New Naturalist Library series from Collins. The whole story of the moth evolution is told in a simple and understandable way, and completed with S. Beaufoy's photos. “Moths” could make a perfect couple with another E. B. Ford's book named, as you can easily guess, “Butterflies” which in the same series of natural history books that amount to 125. The book is available for order on the book series website: http://www.newnaturalists.com/titles/46878/moths-e-b-ford-9780007308217.
Well, this maybe right time to know a little bit more about butterflies and moths from Gloucestershire or Dorset. And to learn how to prepare them in a best way:)
This is Cornwall, http://www.thisiscornwall.co.uk
Photo 1: British Moths & Butterflies, Chris Manley, http://www.wildlifeextra.com
Photo 2: The Colour Identification Guide to Moths of the British Isles, Bernard Skinner, http://www.amazon.co.uk
Photo 3: Moths, E. B. Ford, http://www.newnaturalists.com

29.04.2012 1:13, Peter Khramov:

The database has a subgenus so far...

29.04.2012 0:10, Peter Khramov:

Ok, Russian species will supply the database soon, so I'll move it then.

28.04.2012 22:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Now I can say who! This is Erebia maurisius (Esper, [1803]) = brimo (Böber, 1809).

28.04.2012 21:04, Lev Bely:


“The Magic of Butterfly Reinvention at MGM” is the first butterfly exhibition on Macau, China, to open on May, 16th in a new “Butterfly Pavilion” built at the MGM Macau resort. During the next six months the exhibition will be displaying 100 species of about 1000 alive butterflies. The exhibition space was arranged together with Stephen Stefanou, a well-known American interior designer — not only the very “Butterfly Pavilion” worth seeing, but also the peripheral décor as to big pinwheel trees or willow-vine sculptures.
The pavilion which is 26ft in diameter and 21ft height placed in the very middle of the Grande Praça plaza. The floor is covered with green organic wheatgrass and no less, since this will house best butterflies and moths from all over the world: China, Malaysia, Africa, South America, to name but a few. The eco-friendly, dome-shaped pavilion construction is based on Buckminster Fuller's works, a famous American inventor and architect who is known for his geodesic dome designs. Exhibition visitors will be also amused with animated butterflies fluttering on 60 iPad screens that fixed inside the pavilion. As organizers say, it should “enhance the visual experience”. Custom made willow-vine sculptures by a British artist Tom Hare are to emphasize more “the reinvention of nature”.
The exhibition was assisted with Dr. Victor Yun Wu’s cooperation, a lepidopterist who presents China at butterfly conferences worldwide. Victor Yun Wu developed and now uses special techniques in artificial breeding of butterflies.
MGM Macau, http://www.mgmmacau.com, The Macau Daily Times, http://www.macaudailytimes.com.mo
Photo: the exhibition preparation at the MGM Macau Grande Praça, http://www.macaudailytimes.com.mo

28.04.2012 17:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Photo leaves wide range of opinions as you can see neither the actual size of a butterfly/moth nor how its wings are shaped. I wonder if Shargacucullia was resurrected as subgenus or genus or whatever else?

28.04.2012 16:53, Evgeny Komarov:

I requested Alexey Matov to look at it and he concluded that this might be Cucullia (now Shargacucullia) verbasci since its wings edged with wide parallel shadowy stripes as against to lychnitis and scrophulariae.

28.04.2012 16:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

One should be a very profound expert to identify anything judging by this photo. :)

28.04.2012 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

One should be a very profound expert to identify anything judging by this photo. :)

28.04.2012 12:10, Svetlana Karaeva:

Looks similar to Carcharodus alceae.

28.04.2012 12:04, Svetlana Karaeva:

Looks similar to Carcharodus alceae.

27.04.2012 21:49, Svetlana Karaeva:

Relying upon the shot I suggested it could be a moth of Cucullia genus. Can't go further.

27.04.2012 20:58, Lev Bely:


The California Academy of Sciences found in 1853 has a world's largest biological collection of over than 20 million specimens including 17 million insects. The video underneath gives an interesting short review from an Entomology Department Collections Manager Norman Penny who tells about amazing iridescent morpho butterflies (Morpho), Queen Alexandra's Birdwing butterfly (Ornithoptera alexandrae) sexual dimorphism and California dogface butterfly Zerene eurydice presented also with such a wonder as rare gynandromorphic specimen.
The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk
Photo: the entomology collection at the California Academy of Sciences, http://www.guardian.co.uk
Norman Penny on the butterfly collection at the California Academy of Sciences

27.04.2012 15:21, Peter Khramov:

Svetlana, what about the very name of the species that you claimed as identified?

27.04.2012 15:21, Peter Khramov:

Guys, can anybody approve?

26.04.2012 23:47, Peter Khramov:

A. Got it. Admin is not adding new irrelevant. And she's just your fotoy the blasted. Foty his tie (if they are not attached machine) not through the admin panel and through section Downloaded images in LC. There you can change to the Old fotam.

26.04.2012 22:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, I wrote. Here is a picture hanging in and admin - "# 12475 hydria cervinalis. Evgeny Komarov"

26.04.2012 21:17, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to "uncertain" Thyatiridae.

26.04.2012 21:17, Peter Khramov:

Bah, that's right. Updated.

26.04.2012 21:16, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. So she is currently connected, everything is OK. An example of what the thread then left unconnected, or even try to load something duplicate thread, which is not directly connected. Interestingly, there seems to be nothing, and something can not the blasted ...

26.04.2012 20:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Separately, the hard - abut and do not want to leave. That this has not managed # 12475 hydria cervinalis

26.04.2012 18:37, Maria Pozdnova:

This is rather upperside than the underside.

26.04.2012 18:29, Maria Pozdnova:

Looks like Thyatira batis (the "face" seems to be on the right).

26.04.2012 12:24, Peter Khramov:

I'll see that and tied 78, 77 and 77. Or you later tied separately?

26.04.2012 6:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! What does this mean? I ship a dozen photos, and half goes straight shots in the "not linked". Ie two shots of one kind is "in place" and the second in the non-attached. For example: "# 12478 aleucis distinctata. Evgeny Komarov" not tied in, and loaded with it second photo of the same species do not.And even with such parsley part photo hydria cervinalis, archiearis parthenias, agriopis leucophaearia, agriopis marginaria - ie with species existing in the database, but for some reason normally loaded through one.

26.04.2012 6:51, Nastya Shemelina:

Yes, Kazakhstan (Astana).

25.04.2012 22:55, Peter Khramov:

In addition to http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/12442 photo.

25.04.2012 21:00, Alex Dumchus:



Phuket Butterfly Garden


Once during our trip in Phuket we got an idea to go see Phuket Butterfly Garden being allured by an advertisement which read it was a world's best one with over 40 species of butterfly mated there. Yet before we asked a tour guide of our travel agency about how to reach the garden and she was really surprised and wondered why we're whatsoever going there: “What do you want to see? There are just a couple of butterflies flying to and fro followed by the third one.”
Anyway, we didn't get that seriously since she was definitely not an expert, so we were determined to check it out ourselves. I should notice that there are actually lots of various, beautiful butterflies in Thailand, swallowtail (Papilionidae) particularly.
We were located in the northwestern part of the island near Nai Thon Beach. The Butterfly Garden was almost right in the middle of the island not far from shopping malls. One-way taxi ride cost ~THB800 (Thai baht) and it took about half an hour. There was no alternative transport as well.
Garden entrance fee was THB300 per person. At the entrance we were welcomed by two thai women who offered us refreshing drinks (a quarter of a glass) and cups of butterfly food which was something like a homemade brew with honey and sugar. As for the garden, it began with an insect museum that we saw first — tarantulas, bugs, grasshoppers under glass and farther there were butterfly drawers. Most insects were in good condition, lightning was partial and quite faint. There were no more than 50—70 species of butterfly and moth including many non-native ones such as morpho butterflies (Morpho), Giant Blue Swallowtail (Papilio zalmoxis), Sloane's Urania (Urania sloanus) and others.
Then we could see the butterfly garden itself spread over about 300 sq meters. There was a green kapron net under the glass roof, walls decorated with micromesh, lots of plants, very humid and languorous air. I'm not sure about the inside, but the outside temperature was 39°C. There were as much butterflies as... I could count plenty of 5 species, that's all. Photos and a video attached. I was unlucky to shoot three similar butterflies that flying over the garden and looked like the Great Orange Tip (Hebomoia glaucippe), so I've got only a picture for you to see. The sole swallowtail butterfly over there was supposedly the Common Windmill (Atrophaneura polyeuctes) though I might be wrong. I also glimpsed the Scarlet Mormon (Papilio deiphobus rumanzovia) male alone, albeit could I shoot 'em neither. There was an arbor and a brocaded carp pond in the middle of the garden.



Behind the garden there was kind of a “mating” dim room decorated with net where we saw maybe a dozen butterflies of two species and four tourists, and also an insectarium with 5 pupa sections. We couldn't look over all pupae since at the moment two thai men were taking emerged butterflies out of sections. They actually catching butterflies right on their wings.
Next was a silk museum though it could be hardly named suchwise, just a half-dark room with silkworm pupae (Bombyx mori), an old silk producing machine tool, samples of cloths and something else what I did look through. Cafe and a gift shop with usual stuff, glass encased butterfly wings as key trinkets, butterfly gift boxes with properly spread butterflies that had natural antennas. Morphos, uranias, swallowtail butterflies cost THB1200 (same price in roubles) for one piece.
Well, the Butterfly Garden turned out to be kind of disappointing and could be hardly compared as to, say, Butterfly Garden in the “Vertol City” shopping mall in Rostov-on-Don (Russia). The latter presents at least 20 species of butterfly and moth with such beloved by all as Atlas moth (Attacus atlas), morpho butterflies, monarchs (Danaus), swallowtail butterflies, owl butterflies (Caligo) and a few more.
Just want to warn you not to trust advertising and save your time and money. This is my personal opinion though whilst you may go see and make your own.
Photos: Alex Dumchus

25.04.2012 13:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Some of those moths fly in the daytime.

25.04.2012 13:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Irina Ishkhanovna won't practice such a nonsense.

25.04.2012 13:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I am on weekdays in the city for the weekend at the cottage.

25.04.2012 13:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Gah, there's the rub!

25.04.2012 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Vasily last year said that he could only in Moscow. Basil, nothing has changed in this regard? Alexander said nothing. Eugene, I understand, could not before, but now is not the flag. Eugene, how are you? I'm right now in HH (and I will be here a couple of weeks). You Dim, as I understand it, too.

25.04.2012 12:22, Peter Khramov:

Idea. Make a suggestion to Nizhny Novgorod Butterfly House and you may be lucky to get at any rate a colored paper sheet if not bubbles...

25.04.2012 12:20, Peter Khramov:

Note: Geometridae are kind of moths.

25.04.2012 12:17, Peter Khramov:

Google Chrome browser can be the reason of thousands of photos are unseen whilst the same photos may look way too blue in Internet Explorer 8. Whatever else should display them properly. The trouble's rather connected with browsers than photos, anyway, it's already revealed and all those thousands of photos need revision to get rid of this bug. I'll be brave and soon start off so it would be seen well even in this vicious Google Chrome.

25.04.2012 11:51, Peter Khramov:

Kazakhstan?

25.04.2012 10:07, Nastya Shemelina:

I'm not sure, my friend found it likely in a leaf heap.

25.04.2012 9:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pupa photo, if possible?

25.04.2012 8:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'll check it once get home.

25.04.2012 8:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Something you said about the meeting of the local forum? I do not caught the idea or what?

25.04.2012 8:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Can't see this photo. After the website's renewing there is some trouble in uploading lots of old photos. Or am I the only one who endures this?

25.04.2012 8:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pity we'll have no such a fest! Eager to be presented with soap bubbles!

25.04.2012 8:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Many Geometridae females are wingless, particularly autumn and spring ones.

25.04.2012 7:24, Nastya Shemelina:

Hm... What do you mean "wingless"?! if it could be for anyway? =)

25.04.2012 0:46, Peter Khramov:

Done: http://lepidoptera.pro/community/8663

25.04.2012 0:43, Peter Khramov:

Due to the taxa databases underwent synchronization, photos uploading was temporarily disabled hence photos could be signed wrongly. The synchronization now is finished both as to databases of the Russian and English versions of the website, so users of the English version may upload photos in the usual way.

24.04.2012 23:03, Peter Khramov:

Anastasia, please, note if possible where this thing was actually spotted.

24.04.2012 22:09, Peter Khramov:

Please, no rain. Please, no rain. Please, no rain.

24.04.2012 21:42, Lev Bely:


1st Butterfly Day initiated by Moscow Butterfly House will be celebrated in Moscow (Russia) on May 1st. The event will take place at the All-Russia Exhibition Center starting with a flash mob everyone is welcome to join. To participate, you should take a colored paper sheet from a volunteer and then step into the large butterfly stencil drawn on the ground. At 2pm participants will simultaneously raise paper sheets up in the air so as huge butterfly would be seen from above at The People's Friendship Fountain.
Meet at 1pm at the square between The People's Friendship Fountain and the Central Pavilion. All members will be presented with soap bubbles and entrance tickets to the “Popular science Panopticon” supported with a lecture about what “panopticon” actually means.
Moscow Butterfly House opened in 2007. On April, 29th MBH celebrates its jubilee with a new photo exhibition “Butterflies in nature” and 50 new creatures in the MiniZoo section of tropical insects and animals where you can see such awesome things as Malaysian orchid mantis (Hymenopus coronatus), Sungay Stick Insect (Sungaya inexpectata) and desert cockroach (Therea petiveriana).
Butterfly Day events also include “Handcrafted Paper and Beaded Butterflies” workshop and the “Butterflies on the asphalt” painting competition.
ButterflysDay.ru, http://www.butterflysday.ru
Photo: Common Lime butterfly (Papilio demoleus)
Moscow Butterfly House

24.04.2012 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Alex says there is no any...

24.04.2012 18:21, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. aristolochiae.

24.04.2012 18:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. aristolochiae.

24.04.2012 18:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

24.04.2012 18:18, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

24.04.2012 8:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypolimnas bolina female.

24.04.2012 8:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypolimnas bolina male.

24.04.2012 8:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea sp. Upperside needed.

24.04.2012 8:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Atrophaneura aristolochiae.

24.04.2012 8:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Atrophaneura aristolochiae.

24.04.2012 1:24, Peter Khramov:

Previously wrongly linked families in "Hot butterflies and moths" section now fixed.

23.04.2012 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Superspecies taxa got LSIDs.

23.04.2012 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Wow. Right snap!

23.04.2012 22:38, Marija Jaunkunga:

Sure thing.

23.04.2012 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Were they alive indeed?

23.04.2012 19:55, Marija Jaunkunga:

When I put them back to the tree after having shot, the male intensively sped up pursuing the female. So, no memory shot.

23.04.2012 19:27, Peter Khramov:

If they weren't dead as a doornail, would be cool Biston couple photo.

23.04.2012 19:26, Peter Khramov:

Idea leuconoe?

23.04.2012 16:58, Lev Bely:


Strong storms moved through the Midwest (USA) lately and brought unwelcome guests to Nebraska. Leon Highley, an entomologist from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, said that butterflies and moths which presently flutter around Lincoln and Lancaster County were carried with a recent storm from Gulf Coast.
One day later, Highley found a dead painted lady butterfly (Vanessa) on campus. “My guess is it was blown up from the Gulf states. They don't overwinter. Generally, some insects fly up into the air and wait for the right weather system to carry them to other parts of the country. It's part of an evolutionary strategy to expand their range.”
Next-to-last weekend's storm struck across Oklahoma, Kansas, Nebraska and Iowa. This storm was originated from the confrontation of cold and warm air masses, the latter came from Gulf Coast and resulted in multiple tornadoes.
“Some of the moths and butterflies flitting around are native to Nebraska. — Highley said. — Some of the Gulf Coast visitors, the black cutworm moth (Agrotis ipsilon), for example, may not be harmless. Their larvae threaten corn seedlings.”
The warmest recorded March and a mild April may also make for more butterflies and moths than usual, Highley said.
Highley's colleague Jim Kalisch, an Extension entomologist at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, confirmed that there are more butterflies than could normally be due to that the recent winter was warm. “Army cutworm moths (Euxoa auxiliaris) don't come up from the South, but migrate east to west. They also damage crops, including alfalfa. The moths usually come in waves and could be around for a while.”
Lincoln Journal Star, http://journalstar.com
Photo: a painted lady butterfly (Vanessa atalanta)
Black cutworm moth Agrotis ipsilon

22.04.2012 13:35, Peter Khramov:

Yury, I can perfectly see all recent comments as to photos, topics, species on http://lepidoptera.pro/community page, no worries.

22.04.2012 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Nymphalis vaualbum.

22.04.2012 1:53, Yuriy Karpov:

#7895 photo of Nymphalis xanthomelas is in fact Nymphalis vaualbum, female.

20.04.2012 23:09, Lev Bely:


It was butterflies who brought fame to Damien Hirst, a fancy English artist and famous provocateur who in turn demonstrates his devotion putting them in an empty, unanimated windowless space at the Tate Modern gallery* in London, just to amuse idle gapers and tourists. Surrounded by this “fancy” society they are to emerge from their cocoons and die few days later right here, before the eyes of same idlers.
Those who already saw other Hirst's works likely feel at ease: at any rate they have to enjoy neither a rotting cow's head encircled with a crown of flies, nor a moveless sheep in formaldehyde, nor a gigantic bathtub-sized ashtray full of disgusting butts. Room 5 as opposed is full of sweet tropical butterflies uselessly fluttering inside a closed boxy space to fall down dead on the floor and being picked up right away by careful gallery staff.
“In and Out of Love” was the first individual Hirst's exhibition in 1991 in London's Soho. In a humid room he hung large white canvasses with glued butterfly pupae ready to emerge. After having hatched, they flew around the room with rotting fruits, flowers and sugar water; some mated and laid eggs giving start to a new life cycle. That performance got a notable public resonance.
Today it's renewed at the Tate Modern looking somewhat sad and inspiring both. Surely, butterflies that jazz around greeny country roads in spring or flit by woodland clearings are a certain wonder, but those who spend all their life in closed butterfly conservatories delight as much. Even those who pinned to a cork board still keep some mystery.
In the Victorian era butterfly collecting was quite popular. During butterfly flight periods locals rented their homes to rapt enthusiasts near butterfly hotspots that were in such a high demand as nowadays Wimbledon or the Olympics. Kids hunted for rare species to sell them afterwards to collectors for crazy money. It was also a perfect hobby for clergy that shunned traditional fox hunting and its cruels while collecting enabled them to get enough fresh air. Victorian drawings rooms kept on being filled with pinned butterflies sitting in rows in redwood drawers. This traditional leisure originates another Hirst's exposition at the same Tate Modern — magnificent collages of real butterfly wings.
These days when two-thirds of all British butterflies (59 species) are to decline, dead butterflies might look kind of a mean joke. Butterfly collecting is rather not to be appreciated and some species are even prohibited to catch, although the very collectors happened to be the first to make many significant finds and their supplies still nourish science. Nevertheless, today lacking butterflies inspire creators of all kinds more than ever before.
Hirst is definitely not the first artist enchanted with iridescent, sparkling scales of morpho butterflies (Morpho), he rather queues a long row beginning in ancient Egypt, going through Renaissance paintings, seized by Salvador Dali. Butterflies are everywhere, ever, glimpsing on greeting cards, flying over mass market clothing, expanding their wings to endorse whatsoever, from bank deposits to coffee beans. Butterflies are closely connected to our childhood and this might be the reason of their closeness to our inspirational sources.
Two week after the show started it lives its own life, already not that perfectly performed. All butterflies have emerged from their cocoons and a security guard says plainly that those flying here are brought in every day from outside. As against, the gift shop presents Hirst who is known for his outstanding genius of self-commercializing, as a truly great creator of butterfly prints (£30150, in a limited edition of 50), butterfly deckchairs (£310) and a butterfly umbrella to buy it for £195 and get a nice-looking firmament embellished with your own, nearly pet butterflies. Time to make art.
*Damien Hirst's first retrospective: April 4 — September 9, 2012, London, Tate Modern gallery.
The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk, Tate Modern http://www.tate.org.uk
Photo: Damien Hirst, a butterfly kaleidoscope, Tate Modern. Ray Tang/Rex Features.
Damien Hirst's exhibition at the Tate Modern gallery

20.04.2012 22:00, Peter Khramov:

So, now we've got the new URLs arranged in such a way that a former web page address of http://lepidoptera.pro/authors/vitaly-gumenuk turned into http://lepidoptera.pro/authors/68; http://lepidoptera.pro/articles/yaroslavl-sesiidae did into http://lepidoptera.pro/articles/1; http://lepidoptera.pro/species/papilio-machaon did into http://lepidoptera.pro/taxonomy/8787. Same rules as to superspecies taxa.
Yet numbers might be less handy than names, they disable any possible mess in moving/renaming of taxa as well as doubling of authors' names so that each taxon and author get permanent URLs.
Although former URLs are still valid, when required they'll be redirected to new ones, say, http://lepidoptera.pro/authors/vitaly-gumenuk to browse http://lepidoptera.pro/authors/68, so since now you'd better bookmark newly URLed pages.
P. S. Taxa numbers in URLs correspond to LSID numbers.
Also links from users' comments in the "Authors" page are fixed too.

20.04.2012 16:38, Yuriy Karpov:

This is Nymphalis vaualbum female.

20.04.2012 3:16, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I suffered.

20.04.2012 2:53, Marija Jaunkunga:

Photo # 12348, # 12349 and # 12351 - photo of one Butterflies Orthosia populeti.

19.04.2012 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Goes to O. incerta.

19.04.2012 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Goes to O. incerta.

19.04.2012 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved to O. incerta.

19.04.2012 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined" to O. populeti.

19.04.2012 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined" for O. populeti.

19.04.2012 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined" to O. populeti.

19.04.2012 23:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved to O. populeti.

19.04.2012 23:09, Peter Khramov:

Goes to O. populeti.

19.04.2012 23:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved to O. populeti.

19.04.2012 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

19.04.2012 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.04.2012 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.04.2012 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

19.04.2012 23:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved to B. nubeculosa.

19.04.2012 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'd say, such an Orthosia incerta.

19.04.2012 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'd suppose, such an Orthosia incerta.

19.04.2012 22:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'd say Orthosia incerta.

19.04.2012 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia populeti.

19.04.2012 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia populeti.

19.04.2012 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia populeti.

19.04.2012 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia populeti.

19.04.2012 22:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia populeti.

19.04.2012 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia populeti.

19.04.2012 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.04.2012 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

19.04.2012 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.04.2012 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brachionycha nubeculosa.

19.04.2012 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brachionycha nubeculosa.

19.04.2012 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brachionycha nubeculosa.

19.04.2012 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brachionycha nubeculosa.

19.04.2012 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

You're right, that's Brachionycha nubeculosa.

19.04.2012 22:12, Marija Jaunkunga:

Looks very similar to Brachionycha nubeculosa.

19.04.2012 21:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nymphalis xanthomelas.

19.04.2012 21:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nymphalis xanthomelas.

19.04.2012 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nymphalis xanthomelas.

19.04.2012 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Fixed today.

19.04.2012 17:35, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, that was being fixed all at once, species and photos. Now fixed.

19.04.2012 15:06, Peter Khramov:

The people we have after Fauna Satyrium, there Nordmannia. It should be reduced to something. Can someone give the actual thread Old? We transfer everything to Nordmannia?

19.04.2012 15:05, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

19.04.2012 15:01, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

19.04.2012 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, if it's technically possible and appreciated in general, let's add a webforum.
I just meant that quite local people also use www.molbiol.ru.

19.04.2012 9:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Broken too.

19.04.2012 1:06, Peter Khramov:

Uh-huh, being fixed...

19.04.2012 0:00, Maria Pozdnova:

spini likely not Saturnia.

18.04.2012 23:48, Maria Pozdnova:

Albeit this might be spini yet not Saturnia as well as Theclinae are not Saturniidae.

18.04.2012 18:45, Lev Bely:


Moths have been hatching from last year eggs right inside homes of locals who literally have to dodge insects rushing out onto the streets.
“The moths start off as army cut worms, and as adults become what are commonly known as miller moths (Acronicta leporina).” Donna Duncan, co-owner of D’s Pest Control said. “Right now, basically what’s happening is they’re hatching from eggs that were laid in the fall and what they’re trying to do is migrate to the mountains. It’s just a normal course of how that species is.”
Duncan noted that such infestations usually last just a couple of weeks depending on how many eggs were laid. “We’re getting a lot of calls. We even had a customer that left her garage open and had hundreds of them in her garage.”
Jason Mata who lives in Southwest Lubbock said he has heard others talk about how bad the moths are but he personally hasn’t experienced any issues with moths this year.
Denise Blake, another Southwest Lubbock resident, said the moths have not been a problem for her so far this spring. “We have had a few,” Blake said, “but it hasn’t been an infestation at this point.”
Patrick Porter, an extension entomologist for Texas AgriLife Extension suggests to use insecticides against moths though he's not sure if it could actually help to get rid of them. “Moths are attracted to light,” Porter said. “They are going to go to the light at night and not land on the insecticide-treated surface.”
Dunkan's advise is to change the color of porch lights. “You can change your porch light to a yellow light instead of the regular white light,” Duncan said. “(Moths) are less attracted to the yellow light.”
Lubbock Avalanche Journal, http://lubbockonline.com
Miller moth caterpillar

18.04.2012 14:44, Peter Khramov:

If one webforum were quite enough, wonder why would this website actually exist. Molbiol.ru has different sections for catalogued and photo data though not perfect both.
Anyway, one may now upload whatever photos on Lepidoptera.pro which (photos) if not good enough could be deleted right after species gets identified (if we already have other photos of better quality on the website). The new website will enable to check a special box named like "this photo could be deleted after species identified".

18.04.2012 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

One webforum is quite enough, welcome to register: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showforum=40.

17.04.2012 21:40, Elvir Izmailov:

What about to add some webforum? Like for poor photos not to upload here but to identify species for anyway. I'd put it on such a forum then.

17.04.2012 19:14, Lev Bely:


Butterflies might overlook quite the stuff but an exuberant, bloomy garden. Plant your garden with native plants that will surely attract various butterflies. Choose the very native ones so as butterflies could feed on nectar and caterpillars do on foliage.
Adult butterflies might wrongly lay eggs on a non-native plant what may result in the offspring death. Planning a garden layout, better to prefer sunny areas located far from strong winds.
Things also to consider are the plant type and color. Butterflies are attracted to red, yellow, orange, pink and purple blooms with flat tops, clusters and short tubes. Say, monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) enjoy with beautiful, brightly colored asclepias (Asclepias) of milkweed family.
Make your garden blooming as long as possible since imagos need nectar through all of their life. Would be ideal to use plants that bloom one after another like summer plumbago (Plumbago) changes spring ceanothus (Ceanothus).
Caterpillars would be particularly delighted with trees, dogwoods and flowering crabapple are the best ones.
You can show an outstanding hospitality arranging a special “mud bath” like natural puddles where butterflies teamwise happen to look for water and minerals. Fill a shallow pan with a moist coarse sand, then set it up in the soil somewhere in the garden so as it would be levelled to the ground. Mind that the sand would be humid ever and butterflies will sooner appear.
That's it, your garden is blooming for guests. Take good care for it would stay vivid and joyous!
Tracy Press, http://www.tracypress.com
GrowingWisdom.com on how to attract bees, butterflies and birds to a garden

16.04.2012 21:52, Evgeny Komarov:

As a result, we've got an "amazing" synonymy like Saturnia (Eudia) spini (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775) = Satyrium spini = Nordmannia spini Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775.

16.04.2012 21:49, Evgeny Komarov:

This seems to have already been reported: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/saturnia-pavonia. Somehow the Sloe Emperor Moth (Saturnia spini) got included!

16.04.2012 21:49, Evgeny Komarov:

This seems to have already been reported: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/saturnia-pavonia. Somehow the Sloe Emperor Moth (Saturnia spini) got included!

16.04.2012 13:59, Mihail Nyzhnikov: This species is identified correctly.

15.04.2012 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, will be male.

15.04.2012 21:49, Peter Khramov:

What's so appealing in interviewing folks?.. Why not just show butt-flies accompanied with off-screen voices...

15.04.2012 21:32, Peter Khramov:

If you still come across any, please, e-mail me or comment right here.

15.04.2012 21:31, Lev Bely:


One of the latest studies* says that some butterflies get away from sun to shady forests. Albeit, only few do save themselves in such a way. “A lot of the butterflies we were looking at are threatened by climate change. With the warmer temperatures, it will be too hot for a lot of them to survive in southern Europe,” told Andrew Suggitt, a study researcher, graduate student at the University of York in the United Kingdom.
Researchers were looking to see if under changing temperatures butterflies would move to warmer or cooler areal parts, leaving, say, open, sunny fields for shady, wooded forests.
“We thought the butterflies might be able to use cooler habitat to escape warmer temperatures,” Suggitt said. “If they are doing it at the moment, they might be able to do that to escape climate warming.”
Researches analyzed data on 36 species gathered between 1994 and 2009 from various studies made in the UK and Spain, and they paid special attention to the number of species and individuals in shady habitats and open, sunny areas. Having compared these data to average season temperatures, they found out that there was a direct connection between higher temperatures and butterflies shifting to cooler areas.
In Spain 75% of species (25 of the 36) were also getting away from heat, but within the very species just 1.3% of butterflies really moved to new habitats for every degree Celsius increase in temperature.
“They were making more use of the cooler habitats to do what they need to do, things like mating, feeding and completing their lifecycle, when it's too hot to do that in the warmer habitat,” Suggitt said. “The catch is that the actual proportion of butterfly population that can make the shift is quite small.”
Researchers concluded that though the majority of species are capable to leave for cooler areal parts, those individuals who really change habitat are not enough to save the species.
Most likely, butterflies are also held by their feed plants and other natural resources, so they just can't leave warmer areas even being barely able to survive there.
The study shows that microclimates influenced more butterflies in Spain where changing temperatures literally ousted lepidoptera from their common habitats, while in the United Kingdom butterflies are expanding their range northward. Researchers noted that in Spain butterflies will keep going north and to higher altitudes to escape the heat.
*The study is published in Biology Letters journal.
LiveScience, http://www.livescience.com
Changing Planet on how butterflies react to the climate changing

15.04.2012 18:42, Yuriy Karpov:

Yury, I'm not so inspired with www.plantarium.ru. It has 30 plants or less on Eastern Siberia while there are about 2000. Spots are also not the hottest ones. I do know my plants either where to find butterflies. If you don't want feed plants photos, ok then, let's close the book.

14.04.2012 21:30, Artem Branshteyn:

This is male.

13.04.2012 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to E. fumidella.

13.04.2012 19:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

As I already said, it's too early for pusiella as well as candidella flights. There can be only fumidella in March—April. Besides, candidella has a black pattern which is usually broken close to top what we don't see on this photo.

13.04.2012 19:14, Peter Khramov:

Vlad suggests either pusiella or candidella...

13.04.2012 18:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alas, this is Ethmia fumidella, too early for Ethmia pusiella.

12.04.2012 18:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ethmia pusiella.

12.04.2012 16:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved as analogued to http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/12304.

12.04.2012 16:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved as analogued to http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/12304.

12.04.2012 16:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved as analogued to http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/12290.

12.04.2012 16:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

12.04.2012 16:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.04.2012 16:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

12.04.2012 16:05, Peter Khramov:

Afiget.

12.04.2012 14:25, Andrey Ponomarev:

Semioscopis avellanella.

12.04.2012 14:24, Andrey Ponomarev: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2012 14:23, Andrey Ponomarev:

Semioscopis steinkellneriana.

12.04.2012 14:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.04.2012 14:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Panolis flammea.

12.04.2012 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

All right. Kastnii is a miracle of nature similar to Rhopalocera.

11.04.2012 22:36, Peter Khramov:

Citizens, I even did not catch up. This is clearly http://lepidoptera.ru/species/telchin-licus like a Rhopalocera and is in http://lepidoptera.ru/superfamily/cossoidea while. One thread can clarify the situation?

11.04.2012 19:31, Lev Bely:


Today, April 12th there will be a lecture “Sesiidae: the gathering and breeding” at Timiryazev State Biological Museum, Moscow (Russia). The author is Oleg Gorbunov*, a doctor of biological sciences, the leading research associate of A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, will be talking about how to gather and breed caterpillars of clearwing moths (Sesiidae), and what their natural habitats are. Guests will be also able to see Oleg Gorbunov's personal photos of these moths.
*His research interests include overall study of clearwing moths of the Eastern hemisphere. Oleg Gorbunov engaged in various entomological expeditions through different lands of the former Soviet Union, Vietnam, Egypt, Israel, India, Indonesia, China, Malaysia, Mongolia, Nepal, Thailand, Turkey, Ethiopia and Japan. He authored over than 100 publications, described more than 20 new genera and 130 new species.
The lecture “Sesiidae: the gathering and breeding” is held today, April 12th, at 19:00 in Timiryazev State Biological Museum. No entrance fee.
Timiryazev State Biological Museum, http://www.gbmt.ru
Photo: the Dusky Clearwing moth (Paranthrene tabaniformis)
The Doll's Clearwing moth (Paranthrene dollii)

08.04.2012 10:54, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to "identified successfully".

08.04.2012 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, move it to "identified successfully": http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id175290/.
This is just a subspecies.

08.04.2012 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

07.04.2012 23:06, Peter Khramov:

Why not, it's actually mentioned in Southeast Asia. Hence it might be in Malaysia too.

07.04.2012 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Olga, with the new website you will be able to add information (based on references and personal observations) to species descriptions by your own, as well as the very Cambodia as a location. As such mentions get rather frequent I'll add it as a location right in the "Country" list in the catalog.

07.04.2012 22:46, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

07.04.2012 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zamechatellnaya thing, by the way, these two "dogs".
Now the example Papilio agestor and Parantica sita tried to transfer from one species to another. Painfully imitate each other great.

07.04.2012 21:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that's thoas (identified such today on one internet forum). Likely to be some subspecies.

07.04.2012 21:09, Peter Khramov:

In the frame of the type set two dogs on each side instead of one. Ie Papilio machaon, insteadPapilio machaon @.

07.04.2012 21:08, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

07.04.2012 21:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.04.2012 21:07, Peter Khramov:

Wait for the author's reply, but I strongly suspect that's from some butterfly house. If so, it could be thoas indeed.

07.04.2012 21:06, Peter Khramov:

Ok, it'll be moved as soon as the species gets databased.

07.04.2012 21:06, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, to "uncertain".

07.04.2012 19:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is there any label?

07.04.2012 19:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Papilio polytes romulus male.

07.04.2012 19:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Maniola jurtina

07.04.2012 19:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Maniola jurtina female.

07.04.2012 19:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Caligo eurilochus.

07.04.2012 19:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Caligo eurilochus.

07.04.2012 19:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where is it from???

07.04.2012 19:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Needed for sure, but we seem to get no any (the photo is not a collection one). Rather thus far move it to "uncertain" keeping the species as it's identified. I might have prematurely identified demophon as the most known of the genus.

07.04.2012 17:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

07.04.2012 17:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The underside needed!

07.04.2012 17:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

My congratulations on the discovery of Neptis sappho in Malaysia!

07.04.2012 10:07, Olga Averyanova:

By the way, add, please, Cambodia to the "Country" list.

06.04.2012 20:00, Peter Khramov:

Goes to B. aquilonaris.

06.04.2012 12:20, Sergei Kotov:

Boloria aquilonaris (Stichel, 1908).

06.04.2012 10:51, Peter Khramov:

Probably, the "Shot/caught place" section should suggest to note the height too as well as the sea level for mountain photos...

06.04.2012 0:38, Yuri Semejkin:

This is a suggestion. You are free to make it real or not. Some people pick up caterpillars to raise, so it would be better to know at what height from the ground the caterpillar was picked up from the plant.
Just an example about Zephyrus caterpillars. Not sure of all the world, but I hear everywhere that their egg-layings and caterpillars are in oak tree's crown, therefore they are rather hard to get. The same info I saw on the web, even an idea to knock them down from the tree. I don't know if it's false or what, but last year I picked up Neozephyrus japonicus caterpillar on an oak tree at 1m height from the ground. Hence it would be good to know the height what caterpillar was shot or picked up at.

06.04.2012 0:23, Yuri Semejkin:

For seeking a feed plant. Yury, if we actually have to? We've got feed plants names that mentioned on the website, so if you don't know some plant, search images of it on the web. I'd recommend www.plantarium.ru since some other websites happen to have such a mess, for instance, they could misname nettles as saltbushes or likewise. So I agree with Petr that there is no need to make it tougher, just a simple plant list is pretty enough.
My advice to others is to shoot native plants and create your own photo albums with species properly identified, not limiting yourself to www.plantarium.ru. Get in touch with your local specialists who are pros on the subject, identify plants and voila, you don't need think anymore of whether you should make pictures of feed plants or not. Knowing plants finally will lead you to butterflies you want to see.

05.04.2012 22:34, Peter Khramov:

As the species gets databased, I'll move it right away.

05.04.2012 21:52, Peter Khramov:

Once again: if you have a photo of a caterpillar on a plant, feel free to publish it here right now or whenever. If you think of uploading on the website just a plant photo (with no caterpillar) on what you saw a caterpillar as you suppose it could be possibly a feed plant, please don't. If you're sure of the plant name, just note it uploading your photo, otherwise you may identify the plant species on www.plantarium.ru or websites alike where botanic folks get together, so as they identify it properly and you put the plant name here afterwards. Or we will have to create an individual catalog of plants resulting in its full taxonomy what's actually omg and too much...
Then again, landscape photos rather differ, I wouldn't mash them up with feed plants.

05.04.2012 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

05.04.2012 21:38, Yuriy Karpov:

Melitaea ambigua.

05.04.2012 21:35, Yuriy Karpov:

Neptis sappho.

05.04.2012 21:14, Yuriy Karpov:

Neptis sappho.

05.04.2012 21:01, Igor Sakhno:

As for video, that would be wonderful!

05.04.2012 20:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Archaeoprepona demophon

05.04.2012 20:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gah, meant Prepona demophon, Linnaeus, 1758. Anyway, it should be moved out of here.

05.04.2012 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It ain't no way G. Sarpedon! This is an American Nymphalidae of Prepona genus. I'd suggest Papilio demophon, Linnaeus, 1758.

05.04.2012 20:13, Yuriy Karpov:

I don't agree with the previous suggestion. It's well-known that the wisest thing is to seek for the very plant what caterpillar feeds on, and then butterfly/moth comes there to lay eggs. Many species are quite specialized by their feed plants. I don't know what's on the west, but in Eastern Siberia that works out. And while unordinary cases may happen though very rarely, biotopes are very definite. I think, ideas about landscape photos and feed plants ones are worth pondering.

05.04.2012 17:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "undetermined".

05.04.2012 17:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Boloria dia 100% sure.

05.04.2012 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.04.2012 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.04.2012 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.04.2012 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.04.2012 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.04.2012 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

05.04.2012 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.04.2012 14:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The whole set of #12251; #12250; #12252; #12247; #12253; #12246 should be moved to that. It's not way much variable yet.

05.04.2012 14:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

To "identified successfully". All are Conistra vaccinii.

05.04.2012 13:54, Peter Khramov:

We might already think about adding a special video gallery for illustrating awesome critters!

05.04.2012 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Any suggestions more? To "uncertain"?

05.04.2012 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Yep, I'll add it to synonyms and move.

05.04.2012 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Coenonympha glycerion, "uncertain".

05.04.2012 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Photo of the same species, #12281, is at the admin panel.

05.04.2012 12:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coenonympha glycerion

05.04.2012 12:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely not Coenonympha arcania, probably, Coenonympha glycerion.

05.04.2012 12:24, Peter Khramov:

Goes to H. humuli.

05.04.2012 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hepialus humuli (Linnaeus, 1758), male. Seems to be no any other.

05.04.2012 9:27, Olga Averyanova:

The fifth age, having pupated.

05.04.2012 9:27, Olga Averyanova: This species is identified correctly.

05.04.2012 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?

05.04.2012 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Analogued to #12246 photo.

05.04.2012 8:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Analogued to #12246 shot.

05.04.2012 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?

05.04.2012 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Analogued to #12246 photo.

05.04.2012 8:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Analogued to #12246 photo.

05.04.2012 8:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Conistra vaccinii (Linnaeus, 1761)?

05.04.2012 0:36, Yuri Semejkin:

I can't understand this willing to put here photos of feed plants. Every plant but just a few is a feed one. If one is interested in egg-layings on feed plants, well, it's quite a challenge. What's in uploading feed plants photos? We should know not only the name of the plant, but also its expansion and growing season. If you just own a caterpillar to raise and see what will be the butterfly or moth, there is no need to be aware of plant names. Feed it on what it's been picked up from.

04.04.2012 22:06, Lev Bely:


This moth of Arctiidae family is that very camel designed by a committee. The Polka-Dot Wasp moth (Syntomeida epilais) plays a wasp and has a quite vividly colored getup: its body and wings are iridescent blue-green; legs, wings and antennae are white-spotted; the abdomen ends with a red or orange tip. Then, this “designed” moth is awake in the daytime not at night. However, its concerns are as much routine as ones other usually have: it flaps its wings (the wingspan is about 2 inches), feeds on nectar, habits northern South America, Central America, Mexico, the Caribbean and Florida.
One more curious thing about this Arctiidae moth is that its females don't use pheromones to attract males but an ultrasonic signal that males catch miles apart. A fresh couple arranges a true acoustic duet when they sing together till the very dawn. Perhaps, Puccini's “Madame Butterfly” or whatever nice of the kind.
Oleander moth caterpillar is about 1.5 inches long, colored orange and has black hairs due those it was named Arctiidae. Some caterpillars of the subfamily arctiid are so hairy that they are called “woolly bears”. People on the North predict how cold will be the coming winter by the caterpillar body color. Such a Punxsutawney Phil groundhog moth.
S. epilais moths are deemed as pests since its caterpillars consume oleander, heavily and solely. Curious that caterpillars began eating this poisonous “forbidden fruit” once as the Spanish brought oleander to the New World in the 17th century. As caterpillars get poisonous too, birds ignore them; not stink bugs though which as against are quite satisfied with caterpillars. Well, as they say, one man's meat is another man's poison. Take care, groundhog moth!
The News-Press, http://www.news-press.com
Photo: The Jacksonville Shell Club, http://www.jaxshells.org
The Polka-Dot Wasp moth

04.04.2012 17:56, Peter Khramov:

I still wonder, what those feed plant photos you all everybody's been arguing about? As for illustrating the feed plant section in species descriptions, well, the very section needs some rearranging with proper Latin names instead of those promiscuous we've got now to synchronize it then with www.plantarium.ru so as our local plant names could be linked to appropriate taxa on the partner website, that's what we've already settled with Dmitry ages ago. If the talk is about caterpillar photos on feed plants, so you all are free to upload such providing them, if needed, with plant names to comment a photo.

04.04.2012 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

04.04.2012 14:59, Artem Branshteyn:

Butterfly/moth identifying not always an easy go, but somehow we cope with that teamwise.

04.04.2012 14:57, Artem Branshteyn:

Feed plants photos are necessary. I reckon, it's without any question. If the thing is in identifying stuff and possible users who might be misinformed with wrongly identified plants, let's delegate the making of a feed plants list to those who are qualified enough.

03.04.2012 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Gone back. Going to publish uploaded photos right tomorrow.

03.04.2012 22:46, Peter Khramov:

Having shot a caterpillar on a feed plant. Ok, if the name of a feed plant species is clear, fine, note it and it'll appear in due time on the butterfly/moth description page. When unknown, it's obviously handier to identify it on www.plantarium.ru or websites alike. What's the core of the dispute?)

03.04.2012 14:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Olya! The properly shot plant doesn't take long time for a pro to identify it. Good for you to know plants quite well. Just want to mention that botanic professionals are specialized (not only botanic ones) in this or that, they deeply study one family what they are really good at. Same as to the expansion info. By the way, some plants are just impossible to identify by photo precisely to species as well as some butterflies/moths and certain mushrooms. So if you're aimed to get it precise, take your time. If you're just curious about grass, shoot it on the grass, that's it.

03.04.2012 8:51, Olga Averyanova:

Pardon me, I know plants better than butterflies (though tropical plants), and now I'm building a butterfly aviary where feed plants are obviously going to be in lots. I've been working up a sweat and, believe me, it can be rather hard to find information about feed plant and final data happen to be quite promiscuous. Same as to find feed plant photos even knowing its name, what's not that easy sometimes, e. g. dogbanes (Apocynaceae) which I unsuccessfully tried to find on www.plantarium.ru, having registered there I found out only that the website gives no info about Cambodia where I live while neighbouring China is not so appealing for me. Well, if I had to upload photos on another website plus to this... Thus, I'm not convinced. I'll try to shoot both caterpillars and feed plants for anyway. If not for local folks, just for myself.

03.04.2012 7:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Yury! You convinced me :)! Let's use www.plantarium.ru for that.

03.04.2012 0:36, Yuri Semejkin:

For plants again. Ywis, it appears that sometimes they feed on plants not mentioned as basic ones for their feeding. Yet, how many people can surely identify a plant at least to genus?
Wouldn't that be easier to shoot both caterpillars and plants they feed on to show the latter on www.plantarium.ru afterwards? Local folks can identify stuff quite precisely. Also, over there one may read about how to shoot plants properly to have it next identified.
Then to publish it here together with a caterpillar photo noting the plant identified, who identified that, and his/her profession. Only in this case we can seriously talk of getting the food plants list expanded or completed.

02.04.2012 21:51, Peter Khramov:

So, during these months we'll have the new website engine launched, what will be free of many of bugs the previous one had such as the slow loading of some pages, lack of some interactive options, comments doubling and so on). As for big deals, we'll finally get interactive maps based on Google Maps which will make it possible to mark places where butterfly/moth were caught or shot, and to link corresponding species and photos on the website.
If you have any wishes or suggestions about what you think how the website should've been properly organized, feel free to share them right here. The big works are about to start in mid-April, so please, spread your ideas till then...

02.04.2012 18:34, Evgeny Komarov:

To cons:
1. This addition might be neglected if the technical side is rather complicated to realize on the website, otherwise not.
2. Data about biotopes (landscapes), species habitats, can be very curious as to many Papilionoidea because their statias (habitats) clearly vary in different regions. Interesting to see and compare regions where you can meet such species as the Gorgon Hawkmoth (Sphingonaepiopsis gorgoniades), Hemaris croatica, Saturniidae and so on. Descriptions given to butterflies/moths happen to be not quite precise and, basically, they barely help to know more about the ecology of species. Opposite, it would be great to have pictures of the same species from Moscow region and Far East...
3. Also, there are mostly common names of plants on the website, and, mildly speaking, they're quite far from being correct as well as books from a real life. So this information is important indeed and surely not needless. I can say about my neck of the woods, Volgograd region, here caterpillars of the Small Emperor Moth feed mainly on hypericum-leaved spiraea (Spiraea hypericifolia) while books read about blackthorns. Surely, if it's not a big pain for Petr to do that, this will be very useful for the website. The knowledge about some feed plants not mentioned in special literature is pure information. As for some inaccuracy and errors, well, they take their places as always, everywhere.

02.04.2012 16:39, Yuri Semejkin:

Feed plants photos, no, I think it's needless too. Enough to have a list with scientific names (in Latin). One getting interested to know more, common name or any other details, may surf deeply the web, same www.plantarium.ru or alike.

02.04.2012 16:27, Yuri Semejkin:

I can't see any connection between landscapes and where butterflies and moths are or aren't, cause the latter all depend on what plants their larvae feed on.
As for landscape photos, that's definitely outside the website concept, so does it need this addition? Those who are eager to watch landscape pictures may use that very www.plantarium.ru.

02.04.2012 10:15, Olga Averyanova:

Ugh, would be cool to have at least feed plants descriptions, both for caterpillars and butterflies, since the web lacks such. So I'll be the starter to upload a couple of recent photos of feeding caterpillars.

02.04.2012 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cerura sp. ?erminea?

01.04.2012 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

See no candidates more: might be moved to "identified successfully".

01.04.2012 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to be Eurytides marcellus? Much pity. Isn't it protected in USA (I read it somewhere)? No words, just paradox!

01.04.2012 9:17, Evgeny Komarov:

That positively ought to be! Again, analogued to www.plantarium.ru where it's pretty well done. So the idea about feed plants photos is worth doing indeed.

01.04.2012 8:59, Artem Branshteyn:

Totally agree. Sometimes, rarely, it might be spread like this, but never as an example of the right doing.

01.04.2012 8:47, Artem Branshteyn:

If it could really be connected, that's worth enabling indeed. It would be also a notable advantage to upload together with caterpillars the photos of their feed plants.

01.04.2012 2:09, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

01.04.2012 2:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.04.2012 1:40, Peter Khramov:

If you're talking about photos of biotopes, it's possible for sure. User will be able to cross-connect all his photos, plus to mark photos of the same specimen, e. g.

31.03.2012 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Surely, that could work out. Also, is it possible to provide with biotopes the photos already uploaded?

31.03.2012 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Correbia lycoides (Walker, 1854).
http://www.zonacharrua.com/butterflies/Andes%20-%20Correbia%20lycoides.htm.

31.03.2012 20:24, Peter Khramov:

We've got an idea to upload not only butterflies/moths photos, but also ones of landscapes where they're caught or shot, or just met. It could somehow unite the landscape, butterfly/moth (if presented) and species. Thus, it enables one to see and know more about some specific characteristics as to the caught/shot place, as well as just enjoy beautiful nature views. Any thoughts on the subj?

31.03.2012 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Move it there.

31.03.2012 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spilosoma lutea (Hufnagel, 1766).

31.03.2012 8:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside.

31.03.2012 8:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

30.03.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

30.03.2012 22:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Still it's Euploea sylvester.
Local subspecies happens to have no white spots.

30.03.2012 9:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Actually, the assortment is not large. With mentioned above (doubts about how the dark color on its hind wings goes to the light one), it can be also supposed to be Euploea sylvester (yet this one originally has white spots on its hind wings), and Euploea tulliolus, what's most likely but hasn't been mentioned to be expanded over there.

29.03.2012 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Imo, for an "uncertain" male that's quite sure: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id43111/.

29.03.2012 22:52, Peter Khramov:

Sure enough to move it to "uncertain" or just Euploea sp?

29.03.2012 8:04, Sergey Ashkinadze: This species is identified correctly.

29.03.2012 0:43, Peter Khramov:

People, I'm here now a little slowed down over the holidays, but let's still until we ship the new species - until until the close up and the blue of Funet. In April, should be repaired. And then we will analyze the whole thing and adding new taxa, if necessary.Bo with synchronization and so formed some mess, and if more parallel new types of stick, then in general, all will be very difficult ...
ZY New foty publish in early April.

28.03.2012 22:34, Evgeny Komarov:

And some have gone like photo and some "abut", and in any :)

28.03.2012 22:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Aha! I tried to scatter -; (

28.03.2012 22:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea and no farther, since it's hard to name the species by such a photo. I'd suggest Euploea mulciber.

28.03.2012 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I couldn't watch the video until the end cause it's horrifying indeed. How can he neglect dissecting pins and pin a butterfly through the very wings fixing it to the spreading board? This is rather a master class how one should not spread a butterfly ever.

27.03.2012 20:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Admin does not work yet? Fully just there to whom it is time to take your place.

27.03.2012 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nevermind. I've just ignored the search but checked Archiearis genus first thinking thus far it still belongs to that.

27.03.2012 18:04, Peter Khramov:

Weird... It should've autosuggested you a synonym then...

27.03.2012 17:58, Lev Bely:


The University of Nebraska—Lincoln, NE, chartered in 1869, today is an educational institution of international stature. UNL is listed by the Carnegie Foundation within the “Research Universities (very high research activity)” category. On Feb. 15, 2012 UNL celebrated the 143rd anniversary of its founding.
The University of Nebraska—Lincoln was one of the first institutions west of the Mississippi River to award doctoral degrees since 1896; UNL established the world's first undergraduate psychology laboratory; the discipline of ecology was born here, and the campuses reflect that tradition, being recognized as botanical gardens and arboreta.
In Fall 2011, for the eighth-straight year, the University of Nebraska—Lincoln was among the top 50 public universities listed in U.S. News and World Report's annual evaluation of America's Best Colleges.
The Department of Entomology at the University of Nebraska—Lincoln offers distance entomology courses for self-improvement or even getting a master's degree. Entomology instructors provide students a complete syllabus meeting all UNL standards. Classes are based on current science and follow published schedules and descriptions; instructors are timely in returning grades and in responding to students. Courses overview: Entomology and Pest Management, Insect ID & Natural History, Medical Entomology, Insect Ecology, Forensic Entomology and a few more.
Application information, courses and programs, contact info are at the UNL website http://entomology.unl.edu/distedu/.
The University of Nebraska—Lincoln, http://www.unl.edu, http://entomology.unl.edu/distedu
Photo: The University of Nebraska—Lincoln, http://www.unl.edu
Stephen Spomer, a UNL research technologist's master class on how to spread a butterfly

27.03.2012 9:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uh-huh, got it. I just checked it up in Archiearis as usual. Faulty me :)

26.03.2012 22:36, Peter Khramov:

Yup, moved.

26.03.2012 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, mind that you shouldn't have added the species to the database, so...

26.03.2012 22:32, Peter Khramov:

Thanks to y'all, moved.

25.03.2012 23:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To move to Archiearis parthenias, and no any questions.

25.03.2012 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Namely, this is A. notha male if we look at its forewings http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/arc_not.htm.

25.03.2012 23:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I relied on Alexandr's website http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/epi_tri.htm.
The female underside drawn my attention.

25.03.2012 19:43, Marija Jaunkunga:

No, that's another one.

25.03.2012 19:36, Peter Khramov:

Hm. Isn't that the same one there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/11883?

25.03.2012 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, just seemingly or sure female?

25.03.2012 19:34, Peter Khramov:

Then who?

25.03.2012 19:21, Lev Bely:

“Cyborg bugs come to help” lecture by Dr. Michel Maharbiz from the University of California, Berkeley, will be held on March 26th at the Digital October centre (Moscow, Russia) as a part of the Knowledge Stream project. The lecture is supported by “In the world of science” magazine. Dr. Maharbiz will talk about the latest projects of his laboratory, namely, neuro implants which allow to control insects' flight patterns at a distance. If you want to visit the lecture, please, register yourself at the Digital October centre website, http://digitaloctober.timepad.ru/event/21564. You may make your questions and take part in a discussion followed along with Russian experts in micro— and nanobiology.
If you somehow can't visit the lecture but would like to see that anyway, please, tune in www.digitaloctober.ru or www.knowledgestream.ru to watch it online. Put your questions to the lecturer and comment the discussion in Twitter using #knowledgestream hashtag.
The Digital October centre, http://digitaloctober.timepad.ru

25.03.2012 15:27, Michael Kurz:

I´m engaged in revisionary work of non-ditrysian lepidoptera, especially Micropterigidae (see: http://www.nkis.info/nkis/projKKZ_Adelidae.cgi?uid=TaxOn&lang=e). Since our knowledge of Micropterigidae from all parts of the former Soviet Union is extremely poor, I would be very interested in investigating any material of that family, especially from central Asia, Siberia and the Far East, but also from European Russia. Please feel free to contact me: michael.kurz[et]gmx.at *

25.03.2012 8:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Pardon me, it is not E. theano on the photo!

24.03.2012 16:50, Lev Bely:


How to tell the difference between moths and butterflies except knowing the fact that some are active during the day and others at night? The Montreal Botanical Garden makes it clear with over than 2000 alive butterflies and moths which flitting about in the two Botanical Garden greenhouses, the Main Exhibition Greenhouse and the Fern Greenhouse.
This is a 15th “Butterflies Go Free” exhibition where one may know lots of curious things about butterflies and moths. The exhibition accompanied with a short introductory presentation Bug Bites to answer most asked questions about butterflies.
The Montreal Botanical Garden has also a separate spacious insectarium with live exhibits and insect collections to name one of the most interesting that shows bright iridescent birdwings. Legend says first explorers mistook Ornithoptera for birds and the very Ornithoptera name means “a bird wing”.
These days birdwings are a subject of scientists researches, the species is listed by CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. The Montreal Botanical Garden exposition is unique indeed since birdwings are showed for the first time in North America outside a museum.
The Main Exhibition Greenhouse: 10:00 & 11:00 a.m., noon, 1:00, 2:00, 3:00 & 4:00 p.m.
“Butterflies Go Free” exhibition: February 16 to April 29, 2012, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Tuesday to Sunday. Open Mondays: February 27, March 5 and April 9 (open during Easter weekend).
List of exhibition species: http://www2.ville.montreal.qc.ca/insectarium/en/index.php?section=64&intParent=4&page=aff_vivariums&liste=14&nom=Papillons%20en%20libert%E9.
The Montréal Botanical Garden, http://www2.ville.montreal.qc.ca/jardin
Photo: The Montréal Botanical Garden, http://www2.ville.montreal.qc.ca/jardin
The Montréal Botanical Garden insectarium

24.03.2012 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Is it the same as #12034? Then it's the very Epirrhoe tristata (Linnaeus, 1758), seems to be female.

24.03.2012 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

24.03.2012 13:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'll add the species once as it gets possible.

24.03.2012 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rather could be moved to Archiearis notha (Hubner, 1803), "uncertain".

23.03.2012 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The author is right, it's likely Epirrhoe tristata (Linnaeus, 1758).

22.03.2012 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Yes, that's a bug caused by the recent database renewal. I'll fix that once I come back.

22.03.2012 19:48, Peter Khramov:

Yury, what did you actually confirm, Neptis hylas sopatra?

22.03.2012 19:47, Peter Khramov:

So guys, we leave it as "undetermined" or move to "uncertain"?

22.03.2012 19:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

22.03.2012 19:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

22.03.2012 19:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

22.03.2012 19:44, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, goes to identified females.

22.03.2012 4:35, Yuriy Karpov:

Neptis thisbe female.

22.03.2012 4:32, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2012 4:27, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2012 4:27, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2012 4:11, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

21.03.2012 19:14, Yuriy Karpov:

Gentlemen, are you sure of what it's like that? Got Saturniidae same to Theclinae.

21.03.2012 18:51, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

21.03.2012 17:58, Yuriy Karpov:

Hard to say without seeing its underside, but it's likely to be Augiades selas female.

21.03.2012 16:41, Yuriy Karpov:

Neptis tshetverikovi.

21.03.2012 15:43, Yuriy Karpov: This species is identified correctly.

20.03.2012 14:47, Lev Bely:


Last year august the US Fish and Wildlife Service announced an emergency listing* of the Miami Blue Butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri) as endangered, “We, the Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), exercise our authority pursuant to section 4(b)(7) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), to emergency list the Miami blue butterfly (Cyclargus thomasi bethunebakeri) as endangered. This subspecies is currently known to occur at only a few small remote islands within the Florida Keys. Current population numbers are not known, but are estimated in the hundreds of butterflies.”
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported that it may be too late because no Miami blue butterflies were seen on Bahia Honda since 2010. That might mean that the subspecies has become totally extinct.
Once C. thomasi bethunebakeri habited Florida's coasts in large numbers, but shopping malls, roads and residencies built on these lands made the subspecies diminished to nearly nothing. By the early 90's these butterflies could be found only within the Florida Keys archipelago.
After Hurricane Andrew in 1992 only about 50 Miami Blue butterflies supposed to be left. Since 2003 to 2010 scientists artificially increased the population in the lab to 30000 butterflies and “landed” them in the Keys, but the population didn't survive. Meanwhile, few “wild” ones living on Bahia Honda began vanishing too. The reason seemed to be lots of iguanas which were the offspring of pet iguanas that people let “free” once they got bored. Iguanas destroyed plants that Miami Blue butterflies used for egg-laying.
Few more Florida butterflies and moths are also endangered: the Florida Leafwing (Anaea troglodyta) and the Florida Purplewing (Eunica tatila), Bartram’s Scrub-Hairstreak (Strymon acis), the Martial Scrub-Hairstreak (Strymon martialis) and the Amethyst Hairstreak (Chlorostrymon maesites), the Zestos Skipper (Epargyreus zestos), the Schaus' Swallowtail (Papilio aristodemus).
It turns out so that the Endangered Species Act of 1973 gets to work right after the species needing most to get protected has totally vanished or just no more than few animals left. And it's barely possible to be saved.
*The US Fish and Wildlife Service publication on endangered species from August 10th, 2011: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-08-10/pdf/2011-19812.pdf.
Care2.com, http://www.care2.com
Photo: Care2.com, http://www.care2.com
Associated Press on vanishing Miami Blue butterfly

19.03.2012 22:31, Tom Tams: This species is identified correctly.

19.03.2012 22:30, Tom Tams: This species is identified correctly.

19.03.2012 22:30, Tom Tams: This species is identified correctly.

19.03.2012 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Yep, that's the bug. Thanks for the hint, I'll fix that later.

18.03.2012 12:59, Andrey Ponomarev:

Seems some bug. Here we can see Larentia clavaria photo, then we press "Larentia clavaria description" and, voila, no photo of this species.

16.03.2012 23:08, Peter Khramov:

So related delays in publishing photos and other stuff might be longer than usual.

16.03.2012 18:57, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

16.03.2012 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Now the website is undergoing serious renewal. The database of the Russian version is already renewed, users who work with this version are able to upload photos again. The database of the English version will be updated near time, you could upload your photos once it's done. I'll let you know by mail and announce it on the website as everything gets ready.

16.03.2012 11:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hydraecia micacea.

15.03.2012 21:51, Michael Kurz:

When I click on "upload new photos", I only get an empty page without any possibility to upload anything. What could be the reason ?

15.03.2012 16:38, Michael Kurz: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2012 16:32, Michael Kurz: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2012 16:31, Michael Kurz: This species is identified correctly.

15.03.2012 16:27, Michael Kurz:

Quite certainly, this picture shows Lampronia capitella.

15.03.2012 16:27, Michael Kurz:

Quite certainly, this picture shows Lampronia capitella.

15.03.2012 0:27, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain"?

14.03.2012 23:03, Lev Bely:


Tucked away so that you hardly notice it even passing nearby, a small park in Apollo park somewhere at Milson outskirts, a Palmerston North suburb, being inch by inch turned with hands of its creator and inspired volunteers, into an unordinary, special place for butterflies.
Paul Vandenberg was busy with that very doing all last year — he's been working tirelessly till butterflies of all kinds could rest there all year round, or just perch, whatever they need. Monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) are kind of local stars: once Paul happened to watch hundreds of monarchs rest in the park's willow trees, and, as it often comes, lost his head.
Vandenberg is actually a truck driver, nature lover and bushwalker. Watching butterflies he noticed that they come to the park every winter and stay there for a long time. They spend winter sleeping in trees and sometimes when the sun comes out they wake up and try to take off. “It's an amazing sight,” he said.
The park consists of a few butterfly-shaped gardens with native trees, grasses and swan plants (Asclepias physocarpa) that butterflies need all year round. “They can detect the swan plants from about one kilometre away.” Swan plants are also attractive to other New Zealand butterflies such as the Red Admiral (Vanessa atalanta), Yellow Admiral (Vanessa itea), and the Small Copper (Lycaena phlaeas).
Vandenberg is doing his best for butterflies to get safe and friendly place. As well as he wants to teach people about different species. “If I can educate people and get them interested in our native butterflies that'd be great.”

Paul's ideas captured many people which formed a real “spade knights” community around the park. He himself spends every spare minute on his project whether researching native plants, unloading mulch, hammering in pegs, or drawing up business plans for funding applications.
He's got success: the park monarchs have already received funding from Palmerston North City Environmental Trust, support from Manawatu Native Plant Nurseries, and Palmerston North City Council.
The park is still being arranged and volunteers are sure to have enough work for the near future. Vandenberg hoped to get more funding for the park could be extended and the gardens would “wrap” those willow trees that butterflies loved to rest in.
“We'll have something over this side of the town. It's something else for Milson.”
The park opening this Saturday, in Milson Apollo park, from noon to 3pm. Butterflies will be released in the park, while people will watch and enjoy. Those who won't, will get spades and go digging earth:)
Stuff, http://www.stuff.co.nz
Photo: Butterfly Park and Monarch butterflies in the park, http://www.facebook.com/MonarchsApolloPark
The Monarch caterpillar pupating

14.03.2012 21:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hope, not the last time was I there.

14.03.2012 19:45, Olga Averyanova:

Meh we didn't meet up, I live here.

14.03.2012 17:28, Peter Khramov:

About 800 synonyms added.

13.03.2012 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Taractrocera ardonia?

13.03.2012 18:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ok, waiting for Sinev's data.

13.03.2012 18:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Bah! I was there, in Cambodia, the same dates! Just in Kbal Spean.

13.03.2012 16:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Papilio demoleus.

13.03.2012 16:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.03.2012 16:56, Peter Khramov:

I'll move it as the species gets databased.

13.03.2012 16:55, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved then.

13.03.2012 16:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.03.2012 16:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

13.03.2012 16:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

13.03.2012 16:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

13.03.2012 16:47, Peter Khramov:

How to spend the Easter holidays?))

13.03.2012 16:46, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, sure it would be perfect to own all data by all species and all regions as well. Whatsoever we have what we have so we can try to provide as much information as possible. Therefore, when we mention that the species is met in Germany and not in France with no data by the rest of regions, it's definitely of more use than to limit ourselves with kind of "we know nothing but it's met in Germany". As for Southern Russia, I suspect that Fauna Europea means the south of European part of Russia yet it's just a guess so I translate it literally with no changes. I'm going to add some new info from Sinev's catalogue soon so as Russian regions will be accordingly renamed in the catalogue and search whilst Fauna Europea names could be so far considered as transient ones.

13.03.2012 13:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

"To mention where species is not met is in fact useful since regions where it's absent might be wrongly misconceived either the species could be met there or it's just not mentioned as absent. In this case there would be no misunderstanding."
Hence it requires to describe all regions and islands in the world!

What do you mean by saying that Coenonympha amaryllis is met in "Southern Russia"??? What's actually Southern Russia?

13.03.2012 11:46, Peter Khramov:

It's systematized by Fauna Europea along with the former Lepidoptera.ru classification. As for Triphysa, would you please link it? I'll check it out. To mention where species is not met is in fact useful since regions where it's absent might be wrongly misconceived either the species could be met there or it's just not mentioned as absent. In this case there would be no misunderstanding.

13.03.2012 8:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How it's actually systematized? Why Triphysa belong to Coenonympha? I think needless to mention where species is not met.

13.03.2012 0:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Udea sp.

12.03.2012 22:56, Lev Bely:


How to spend the Easter weekend? Hunting butterflies, obviously. Holgates Silverdale Park in Cumbria offers you to get your family together and enjoy the amazing spring bloomy nature.
Holgates Silverdale Park which is wonderfully embedded in the Cumbrian picturesque countryside was recently awarded the “England and Overall AA Campsite of the Year”. Whatsoever it's titled, each spring local butterflies and moths wake up as usual. The park invites to a special “Butterfly Walk” in which you can meet rare species such as the Duke of Burgundy (Hamearis lucina) and High Brown Fritillary (Argynnis adippe). The very April is a perfect time to watch them in their natural habitat, woodland around Silverdale.
During the Easter holidays the park also holds its annual “Easter Egg Hunt” that encourages everyone to take part in discovering new tracks and creating new routes, whether by foot or bike.
For those who aren't enough with butterflies even rarest, there is the on-site spa, heated pool, sauna and steam room. Mad Maxes can compete in the gym, games room, outdoor adventure area and soft play area for kids. A shop, restaurant and bar might not be right places to hunt the Duke of Burgundy, but surely good ones to find someone who will be happy to know the latest butterfly news.
The Easter getaway to Holgates Silverdale Park costs £40 per night for a family of four, on a fully serviced pitch for a tent, caravan or motorhome, which includes use of the leisure facilities. You may also hire a holiday home, for weekend or longer. The booking information and contacts are at the park website: http://www.holgates.co.uk.
Out & About Live, http://www.outandaboutlive.co.uk
Photo: Holgates Silverdale Park, http://www.holgates.co.uk
Cumbrian butterflies and moths: the Common Blue (Polyommatus icarus), the Large Skipper (Ochlodes sylvanus), the Meadow Brown (Maniola jurtina), the Comma (Polygonia c-album) and the High Brown Fritillary (Argynnis adippe)

12.03.2012 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2012 18:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euthalia aconthea female.

12.03.2012 18:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euthalia aconthea female.

12.03.2012 18:55, Igor Sakhno:

Bah, that's the question. Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and so on.

12.03.2012 18:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peridrome orbicularis female.

12.03.2012 18:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Graphium arycles.

12.03.2012 18:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2012 18:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias descombesi.

12.03.2012 18:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Delias descombesi.

12.03.2012 18:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio demoleus.

12.03.2012 18:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio demoleus.

12.03.2012 18:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2012 18:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2012 18:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euthalia lepidea.

12.03.2012 18:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2012 18:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea mulciber.

12.03.2012 18:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Euploea mulciber.

11.03.2012 16:53, Olga Averyanova:

Graphium arycles arycles?

10.03.2012 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Sphingidae, that Sphingidae...

10.03.2012 23:39, Peter Khramov:

The underside is http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/11936.

10.03.2012 23:39, Peter Khramov:

The photo is published to show the underside of a moth http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/11937.

10.03.2012 23:37, Lev Bely:


The darkening of the peppered moth (Biston betularia) often met in school textbooks as a case study for adaptation, was confirmed as an accurate example of natural selection, according to a study made by a biologist of the Harvard university together with other scientists.
During the Industrial Revolution, English scientists noticed that peppered moths became getting darker and the number of dark ones increased. Then they supposed that moths got darker after trees got covered with soot. In the last decades of the 19th century air became cleaner and lighter colored moths thereafter increased.
During the 1980s and 1990s this idea yet aroused new disputes in scientific circles, according to the paper’s co-author James Mallet, a lecturer in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology. “It was just too good of a story, so scientists began looking for possible problems with it,” Mallet said.
Michael Majerus, a professor at University of Cambridge was one of the first researchers who raised these concerns and eventually finished this debate between uomini illustri. As Mallet's paper reads, Majerus set out on a six-year project to conduct experiments and make observations to improve on the previous work. The data he got helped scientists to evaluate the evolution of peppered moths.
“Majerus felt some of the experiments hadn’t been very well done, though he believed natural selection was the main factor that explained the change in color of peppered moths,” Mallet said.
Majerus let moths out so that they could land freely not only on the tree trunk, but also on its branches and twigs. According to the study, he also released them in smaller numbers and at night.
“The peppered moth experiment is the biggest of its type,” Mallet said. “It was done in the most careful way that Michael Majerus, who is really an expert on the moths, could devise — and therefore it answers many of the possible criticisms that he and others had on the previous experiments.”
Mallet together with three other professors from British universities used the results of Majerus' work to write this paper that finally confirmed the original idea which has been long time just supposed.
“With this new evidence added to the existing data, it is virtually impossible to escape the previously accepted conclusion that visual predation by birds is the major cause of rapid changes in frequency of melanic [dark] peppered moths,” the study reported.
The Harvard Crimson, http://www.thecrimson.com
Photo: Vitaly Gumenyuk, http://lepidoptera.pro
BBC on the evolution of peppered-moths

10.03.2012 19:04, Lev Bely:


Sandesh Kadur photographer met a giant Atlas moth (Attacus atlas) during his trip through the eastern Himalayas where he headed for to study and shoot the local biodiversity. Early morning while driving somewhere in Arunachal Pradesh he suddenly noticed a “ginormous moth” sitting on a road by a pothole. Once Kadur got out the moth immediately took a defensive posture, spread its wings as wide as possible and leant itself forward to seem bigger. Meanwhile, one of Kadur's colleagues went round the back to see it better: the moth wingspan turned out to be wider than its face. Having finished this accidental photo shoot Kadur carefully put the moth off the road as he wasn't sure if it would be safe to leave it sitting there.
The Atlas moth is a giant amidst insects, one of the world's biggest moths with a 25cm wingspan. While these giants are a common sight in South Asia, they can also be met all the way from India to Papua New Guinea. The moth deters predators both with its wingspan and striking patterns. Curious that some dangerous animals and insects like wasps or poison frogs are colored same warning tones. In China the Atlas moth is called “snake's head moth” for its snake-like ornament on the tips of its wings.
Well, Kadur's tsar looks excellent indeed. The Indian tsar!
New Scientist, http://www.newscientist.com
Photo: Sandesh Kadur, New Scientist, http://www.newscientist.com

08.03.2012 23:02, Dmitrii Covalenco:

Straight Sphingidae.

08.03.2012 22:43, Dmitrii Covalenco:

Archiearis parthenias.

08.03.2012 22:41, Dmitrii Covalenco:

Can't tell even its genus...

08.03.2012 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Wonder where you could only dig such out...

08.03.2012 20:48, Peter Khramov:

Now search with auto choice selection includes also species synonyms plus to Latin and common names.

08.03.2012 18:59, Lev Bely:


On February 16 “butterfly” artist Paul Villinski came to Centre Avenue Elementary School (East Rockaway, New York) and made a good thing: namely, he installed a cobalt-blue butterfly sculpture. They obviously could not let him leave empty-handed, so he happened to show them his artwork while students shared their dreams.
American artist Paul Villinski creates his artwork using anything he could find such as crushed cans, police barriers and clothing to recycle all this rubbish into butterflies. His works have been exhibited in various galleries nationwide, including recently Museum of Arts and Design in New York and Prospect 1 International Art Biennial in New Orleans. Paul was invited to Centre Avenue school by means of the PTA memorial fund (Parent-Teacher Association) that was set up for a former student of the school.
“Paul offered us the art, his professional installation and his time to teach the students,” said teacher Linda Grace. “He donated three books of his art — one for our library, one for me for giving him the opportunity to be part of this project, and one for the student’s parents. His butterflies represent joy and happiness — words used to describe this child who was always smiling!”
LI Herald, http://www.liherald.com
Photo: Paul Villinski's “Yes” installation, http://www.paulvillinski.com
Paul Villinski butterflies

08.03.2012 14:30, Dmitrii Covalenco:

Neptis sappho.

08.03.2012 14:28, Dmitrii Covalenco:

Archiearis parthenias.

08.03.2012 14:27, Dmitrii Covalenco:

Maybe, that's Archiearis parthenias?

08.03.2012 14:09, Dmitrii Covalenco: This species is identified correctly.

08.03.2012 13:52, Dmitrii Covalenco: This species is identified correctly.

08.03.2012 12:49, Dmitrii Covalenco: This species is identified correctly.

08.03.2012 2:34, Peter Khramov:

Igor, pepsi generation wonders what's "under the USSR belt"? :--)

08.03.2012 2:33, Peter Khramov:

Break delayed as much as two weeks, but now everything is OK - you can safely ship the photographs used in this case will have a new system ...

08.03.2012 2:29, Igor Sakhno:

Under the USSR belt.

08.03.2012 2:22, Igor Sakhno:

Well, I'd suppose it's a poplar hawk-moth.

07.03.2012 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Subspecies on the species description page now shown properly. Search by intermediary taxa with auto choice selection works good as well.

07.03.2012 20:52, Lev Bely:


On February 18th Timiryazev State Biological Museum presented a new exhibition “New arrivals”. Over the past few years museum collections were supplied with more than 16000 new showpieces which are selectively shown at the exhibition. The insect collection which is one of the richest in the museum was updated with longhorn beetles and butterflies of the professor N. B. Korostelyov's collection.
The new showpieces also include Indo-West Pacific clamshells, a stuffed Steller's sea eagle, the species which is included in the IUCN Red List, nests and layings collection and, besides, herbarium, animal bulks and even a gray whale spinal bone, all gathered by museum's research employees during their expeditions.
The photo exhibition “The Samara bend, an island nature reserve” will last just two weeks, March 17th — April 1st. The exhibition is a part of the project named “Russia reserved: specially protected natural territories” which is aimed to save Russian unique natural cenosis.
Amidst showpieces there are curious animals and plants of this nature reserve such as forest ones — edible dormouse, pine marten, English oak; steppe greater mole rat, feather grass, yellow star of Bethlehem and other. Many of them are at their expansion edges due to that some forest animals and plants can't be found more southerly as well as steppe ones not met more northerly. In the very Samara bend 10 new plant species were discovered, and a few are nearly endemic. There will be also Red List animals and plants shown at the exhibition, like the Apollo butterfly (Parnassius apollo), stag beetle, carpenter bee, lady's-slipper orchid, Adonis plant and more.
The “New arrivals” exhibition is open till December, 21st.
The photo exhibition “The Samara bend, an island nature reserve”: March 17th — April 1st.
Every third Sunday of each month the entrance is free. Monday is a day off.
Timiryazev State Biological Museum, http://www.gbmt.ru

06.03.2012 22:57, Peter Khramov:

The wrong showing of the related species of the same genus on the species description page now fixed.

06.03.2012 20:26, Peter Khramov:

The last publication incorrect date showing in the right “Blog” section is now fixed.

06.03.2012 18:29, Lev Bely:

How to say “butterfly” in !Xu bushman language or in Indian telugu? Easy. Just remember that Sorbian-Lower “mjatel” turns into “mjetel” when it's Sorbian-Upper, Cheyenne “hevavahkema” sounds quite different from Cornish tykki-Dyw, while Paiute “tsoapu” as much interesting as Pittsburgh “dupa erfly”. In all there are about 5000 languages in the world what kind of makes this language table a drop in the ocean... What an amazing ocean yet!


Language or dialect (country or a local place)
“Butterfly” word


Acoma (Native American)
buh’rai


Afrikaans (South Africa)
skoenlapper, vlinder


Aja-Gbe (Benin, Togo)
pkolinouhoin


Albanian (Albania)
flutura


Amharic (Ethiopia)
birrabirro


Anglo Saxon
fifoldara


Arabic (Standard)
farasha, abu daqeek(?)


Arabic (Algeria)
bofertoto, bu frtutu


Arabic (Morocco)
fertito


Arabic (Tunisia)
fartattu


Aragonese
birabolas(?), pitazana(?)


Armenian (Eastern)
teeter, titer, teeterneeg, teeternig


Assamese (India)
pokhila


Austria
falter (common term)


Ayamara
taparacu (?)


Baagandji (New South Wales, Australia)
bilyululijga


Balinese (Indonesia)
kupukupu


Bangla ('Bengali', Bangladesh)
projapoti, prajapati



Bambura
dimago


Basque
tximeleta, pinpirin, pinpilinpauxa


Bemba (Zambia)
cipelebesha



Bengali
prajapathi


Berber (North Africa)
tèfètuth



Berlinerisch (Berlin, Germany)
Schmettalüng


Breton (Brittany and Loire-Atlantique)
balafenn



Bulgarian (Bulgaria)
peperooda, peperootka


Buli (Gur language in N. Ghana)
kpalo?



Burmese (Burma)
lapia


Byelorussian
matylok



Cantonese (Yale)
Wùh dihp


Cape Verdean Criolu
gorgoleta



Carelian (Finno-Ugric Group- former province of Finland)
liippo, liipponen


Catalan (Ancient)
papalló



Catalan (Dialectical)
paloma, palometa, babaiana


Catalan
papallona



Cebuano (Philippines)
Alibangbang/kaba-kaba


Central Carrier (Western Canada)
tsangwelht'ah



Chamorro (Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands)
ababang


Chechen (Chechnya)
polla



Cheremissian (Finno-Ugric Group)
lepe, lepene


Cherokee (Native American)
kamama



Cheyenne (Native American)
hevavahkema


Cornish
tykki-Dyw



Corsican
barabulella


Croatian
leptir



Czech
motýl


Dagon
peplim (pee plim´)



Danish (Denmark)
sommerfugl (=summer bird)


Danish (N. Jutland)
sommerflue



Danish (S. Jutland)
skurvefugl


Deri (Afghanistan)
showparak



Dhivehi (Maldives)
kokaa


Djingli (Australian N.T.)
marlimarlirni



Dutch (Netherlands)
vlindeer; dagvlinder; vlinderslag


Dutch (Middle Dutch)
viveltre



Eischwiele Platt (West German dialect)
Sommevuel


English
butterfly



English (Middle English)
buterflie


English (Old English)
buttorfleoge



Esperanto
papilio


Estonian (Estonia)
liblikas



Ewe (Togo)
dyekpakpa


Faroese
summurfuglur; firivaldur



Farsi (Persian - Iran)
parvanè or parvanèh (stress on final è-sound)


Fijian (Fiji)
bebe (pronounced mbeh-mbeh, 'eh'
elongated) from "A New Fijian Dictionary", 1968



Finnish (Finland)
perhonen


Font (Benin)
awadapepe



French
papillon


Fulani (West and Central Africa)
lilldeh



Futurese (The American Language in 3000AD)
batuhfle


Gaelic (Ireland)
féileacán, follican



Gaelic (Scotland)
dearbadan-de, dealan-dé


Galician
volvoreta, bolboreta



Gen (Ghana)
abèbe, abè, abey


Geordie (England - Tyneside region)
lowey



Georgian (Georgia)
pepela


German (Germany)
Schmetterling



German (poetic)
Falter


German (Early New High German)
feifalter, sommervogel



German (Low German)
Botterlicker, Ülepüle


German (Middle High German)
Vivalter



German (Old High German)
Fifaltra


Greek (Modern)
petalou'da



Greek (Ancient)
psyche


Guarani (A dialect in Paraguay)
panambi (XI)



Gujarati (India)
patangeo, patangiyu


Gurage (Ethiopia)
billambilloot



Hadiya (Ethiopia)
birabira


Hanty or Ostjak (Finno-Ugric Group Ob-Ugrian branch)
lepentaj



Hausa (Nigeria, Niger, Burkina Faso, Cóte D´ivoire (Ivory Coast), Togo, Benin, Cameroon and Ghana)
bude littafi, malam bu'de littafi


Hawaiian (Hawaii)
pulelehua



Hebrew (Israel)
parpar


Hessian (Germany)
Schmedderling



Hindi (India)
titli; thithili


Hmong (Vietnam)
npau npaim



Hopi (Native American - USA)
povolhoya (monarch: hookona)


Huastec (Mexico)
lemtutu



Hungarian (Hungary)
lepke
pillango, pillangok


Ibu (Nigeria)

olookolombooka


Icelandic (Iceland)
fiðrildi


Icelandic (Old Iceland)

fífrildi


Ido (a 'universal' second language)
papiliono


Igbo (Nigeria)

ihe n'efe-efe or uru baba


Ila (Zambia)
inkongolo; sikapempenya


Ilocano (Phillipines)

kulibangbang


Indonesian
kupu-kupu, rama rama


Interlingua (a universal second language)

papilion


Interlingue (a universal second language)
papilio


Inuit (Greenland)

pakkaluak; paluak; utsuppaluak; takalekisa


Inupiak (Alaskan native language)
taqalukisaq


Irish

féileacán (in phonetic English pronounced "faylacawn")


Italian (Italy)
farfalla


Italian (Neapolitan)

palomma


Jacaltec (Mexico)
nam


Japanese (Japan)

choo; chou chou; chocho


Javanese
kupu


Jèrriais (form of the Norman language spoken in Jersey, Channel Islands - in decline)

papillote


Jívaro (Amazonian lowlands, Ecuador to Peru)
wámpishuk


Kaibab Paiute (Native American)

aïcïvïtsi (ï = barred-i, c = long-s)


Kalderash Romanes "Gypsy"
peperuga


Kamaba (Kenya)

kimbalut'ya


Kambaata (Ethiopia)
bilatishu


Kannada (South India)

chitta, baruthe, barutha


Karok (NW California, nearly extinct)
xatimniim


Kashmiri (India/Pakistan)

titili


Kazakh (Kazakhstan)
kobelek


Kikongo (Congo Brazaville)

lumbebeba


Kikuyu (Kenya)
kihuruta


Kinyarwanda (Rwanda)

ikinyugunyugu


Kirundi (Burundi)
ikinyugunyugu


Kisuaheli (Suaheli )

ikinyugunyugu


Kitaita
kifurute


Koasati (Native American - AL, LA, TX - USA)

hacokpalpa


Kokani (India)
pakho


Konni (Gur language in N. Ghana)

kpanjabi?


Korean (Korea)
nahby; nabi


Kroboo (Ghana)

kutuu


Kurdish (Turkey)
sepirek, pürpüruk


Kurmanji Kurdish

fepule, minni, tirtirk


Kwanyama (Namibia/Angola border)
onanga


Kwara'áe: (a language of the Pacific)

bébe


Kyaka Enga (East New Guinea Highlands)>
maemae


Kyrgyz (Kyrgyzstan)
göpölök



Lakhotah Sioux (Native American)
kimimila (key-me'-me-lah)


Lamba (Zambia)
ici-pempele



Lan (a language of the Pacific)
bébe


Lao (Laos)
meng kabeua; maingkabula



Latin
papilio


Latvian (Latvia)
taurins; tauriøð



Lihua (Sudan)
ukulukula


Limburgish (Limburg and Rhineland regions)
vlinder, piepel



Lingala (Democratic Republic of Congo)
kipouzala; mpornboli


Lithuanian (Lithuania)
drugelis; peteliske; petelishke



Lozi (Zambia)
sipulumuki


Luganda or Ganda (Uganda)
ekiwojjolo



Luiseño (Native American)
avéllaka


Luo (Africa)
oguyo



Lushootseed (Native American)
yubec


Luxemburgish (Luxembourg)
Päiperlek



Majang (Nilo-Saharan)
bimbilo


Majang (Nilo-Saharan)
bimbilo



Malagasy (Madagascar)
lolo


Malayalam (Kerala-South India)
poompatta (meaning insect like a flower)



Malay (Malaysia and Brunei)
kupukupu; ramarama


Malaysian
rama-rama



Maltese
farfett


Mandarin - Pinyin
húdié



Mandarin - Yale
húdyé


Mandarin - Wades-Giles
hu-tieh



Mandarin - Gwoyeu Romatzyh
hwudye


Mandingo (Ivory Coast)
vrievran



Manobo (Philippines)
kelivangbang


Mansi (Finno-Ugric Group Ob-Ugrian branch)
läpääk



Manx Gaelic (Isle of Man)
follican


Maori
pepeké purerehua'



Mapudungun (spoken in central Chile and west central Argentina by the Mapuche)
llampüdken (вариант: llampüdkeñ)


Maracucho (Vicinity of Maracaibo, Venezuela)
tara or tarita (XI)



Maranao (Philipines)
paroparo


Marathi (India)
phulpakhru, phoolpaharu



Mari (Finno-Ugric Group)
lepe, lepene


Masai
osampurumpuri



Mayan
pepen


Mayi-Kulan (Queensland, Aus.)
pardirr



Mekeo (Austronesian lang. of SE Papua)
fefe; fefe-fefe


Mekeo (West)
pepeo



Mende (Sierra Leone)
buwa


Micmac (Eastern Canada)
Miimiiges - pronounced "me me ges"



Mongolian
erveehey


Mopan (Mexico)
pempem



Moré (Burkina Faso)
pilimpiko; abaga


Motu (Papua)
kau-bebe



Mukuni (Zambia)
limpempele


Mvskoke (Creek - Native American)
tvffolopv, tvffolope



Nahuatl (Aztec)
paplotl; papalotl


Navajo (Native American)
k'aalogii (accent on "o"); ho'o neno



Ndumba (South Africa)
kaapura’rora


Nepali (Nepal)
putali



Neuro (Ethiopia)
mantech


Ngaju Dayak (Indonesia)
kakupo



North Frisian (North Frisia, Germany - endangered)
schrubföögel, samerföögel


Norwegian (Bokmål)
sommerfugl



Norwegian (Nynorsk)
sommarfugl


Occitan
parpalhol



Ojibway (Native American)
memenghwaah


Oriya (India)
prajapati



Oromic (Ethiopia)
billaacha


Osage (Native American)
dsithato’ga



Ossetian (Ossetia, on the borders of Russia and Georgia)
gælæbu


Paipai (Baja California Norte, Mexico)
minmin, nyirwir, maskarap



Paiute (Native American - Western USA)
tsoapu


Paiwan (native to Taiwan)
kalidungudungul



Pakistan (Northern region)
palmandook


Palauan (Palau, Micronesia)
bangikoi



Patois of St. Thomas
zanimo


Peul (Guinée Conakry)
pucharlar



Peul (Mauritania)
bidilallah, bedelallah


Peul (Sierra Leone)
palapala



Pittsburghese (Pittsburgh, PA, USA)
dupa erfly


Polish (Poland)
motyl



Portuguese (Portugal)
borboleta


Quechua (Bolivia, Peru)
aliñuahi(?), urubamba(?), pilpintu,
pillpintu, pirpintu, pilipintu, pilhpintu



Rom or Kaalo (Gypsy language, Finland)
besko-chirikli (little bird) or deulesko besko-chirikli (God's little bird)


Roma (Gypsy language, Slovakia)
lepetka



Romanian (Romania)
fluture, fluturi; flutare


Romanish
fluture, fluturi; flutare



Romansh (also spelled Romansch, Rumants(c)h, or Romanche (Switzerland)
tgiralla


Russian (Russia)
bábochka; babochka; motyliok



Samic (Native Lappish people in Lappland)
lablok


Samoan (Samoa and American Samoa)
Pepe



San (Bushman language)
tha thava, tavalele


Sardic (Sardinia, Italy)
mariavolavola



Saterfrisian (East Frisia, Germany)
Flinnerke


Saterfrisian (Utände)
Flitterke



Senegalese
lupe lupe


Sepedi (South Africa)
serurubele



Serbian
leptir


Setwana (Botswana)
serurubele



Shona
shavishavi


Shoshoni (Native American)
waayapputunkih



Sidamo (Ethiopia)
bilach'a


Sign Language
interlocked thumbs, flapping hands like wings



Sinhala (Sri Lanka)
samanalaya


Sioux (Native American)
kimimi



Slavic
neveah


Slovak (Slovakia)
motýl



Slovenian
metulj


Somali (N.E. Africa)
balanbaalis



Sotho (Bantu language, South Africa)
sororomele; serurubele


Sorbian-Lower (Slavonic minority in Germany)
mjatel or mjatelik (diminutive)


Sorbian-Upper (Slavonic minority in Germany)
mjetel or mjetelčka (diminutive)


Soussous (Guinée Conakry)

chuani


Spanish
mariposa


Spanish (Ancient and Dialectical)

paloma, palomica ('dove')


Sranantongo (Surinam)
kaperka


Stellingwarfs (Ooststellingwerf and Weststellingwerf in Dutch province of Friesland)

vlinder


Sumatra Barat (Indonesia)
angiak


Swahili (Africa, Somalia to northern Mozambique)

kipepeo; kungu-urumu


Swazi (Swaziland)
luvivane


Swedish (Sweden)

fjäril


Swedish (Old Swedish)
fiädhal


Swiss German

Schmätterling


Tagalog (Philippines)
paru-paro


Tatar (a Turkic language)

kübelek


Taino
tanama


Taiwanese (Taiwan)

o' -tiap ("moth" is ya-a)


Tamil (India)
vannattuppucci; pattampoochi


Telugu (India)

chetakoka chiluka; sitakoka chiluka


Teso (Uganda, Kenya)
eporiporit


Tewa (Native American)

pojoaque


Thai (Thailand)
meng peeseua; pi sugnya


Tigre (Ethiopia)

tsenblale


Tigrigna (Ethiopia)
tsimblalee'a


Tiwi (Melville & Bathurst Islands, Aus.)

kwarikwaringa


Tok Pisin (New Guinea)
bataplai; bembe


Tshiluba (Congo (Zaire))

bulubulu


Tohono O'odham or Papago (Sonoran Desert of the southwest United States and northwest Mexico)
hohokimal


Tok Pisin (Melanesian Pidgin)

bataplai


Trukese or Chuukese (Island of Chuuk, Micronesia)
nipwisipwis


Tshiluba (Zaire)

bulubulu


Turkish (Turkey)
kelebek


Turkmen (Turkmenistan)

chuturast, kelebek


Tuvaluan (Tuvalu - a Polynesian nation of 9 islands)
pepe


Tuvinian (Siberia)

khovagan


Twi (Ghana)
afafranto


Ukrainian (Ukraine)

metelyk


Urdu (Pakistan)
titli


Urubu (Nigeria)

iyenye, yenjè


Uzbek (Uzbekistan)
kapalak


Venda (South Africa)

tshisusu


Veps (Finno-Ugric Group)
lipikäine


Vietnamese (Vietnam)

buom buom; ho diep


Visayan (Philippines)
kabakaba


Welsh (Wales)

iâr fach yr haf (literally "little summer hen"); glöyn byw"(roughly "living glow"); pila pala; bila bala


West Armenian
titernig


Wik-Ngathan (Australia)

kalpakalpay


Wolaytigna (Ethopia)
mukaw


Wolof (Senegal, Gambia, and Mauritania )

lëpp-lëpp bi


Xhosa (Eastern Cape)
ibhabhathane


Xitchangani (Bantu lang. of Mozambique)

phapharati


Yaqui (Native American - USA)
vaisevo’i


Ygyde (an artificial language)

ykolobo


Yiddish
schmetterling; zomerfeygele ("summer bird"); flaterl; motyl


Yoruba (West Africa - Nigeria, Benin, and Togo)

labalaba


Yucatec Maya (Yucatán Peninsula, northern Belize, parts of Guatemala)
pepem


Yup'ik (Alaskan native language)

Caqelngataq


Yurok (Native American, northwest California)
wrrp


Zulu (KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa)

iveveshane; uvemvane; ijubajubane; itwabitwabi


!Xu (Bushman language of the Kalahari Desert)
Dhad'hama


The Butterfly Website, http://butterflywebsite.com
How to say “butterfly” in a sign language (Russian)

06.03.2012 13:46, Yuri Semejkin:

Descoreba simplex Butler, 1878. Identified by Belyaev E. A., FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

06.03.2012 13:44, Yuri Semejkin:

Descoreba simplex Butler, 1878. Identified by Belyaev E. A., FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

06.03.2012 13:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Endropiodes indictinaria (Bremer, 1864). Identified by Belyaev E. A., FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

06.03.2012 13:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Inurois fletcheri. Identified by Vasilenko S. V. Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals Siberian Branch of RAS (ISEA SB RAS).

06.03.2012 13:34, Yuri Semejkin:

Pachyerannis obliquaria. Identified by Vasilenko S. V. Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals Siberian Branch of RAS (ISEA SB RAS).

06.03.2012 12:40, Yuri Semejkin:

Pachyerannis obliquaria. Identified by Vasilenko S. V. Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals Siberian Branch of RAS (ISEA SB RAS).

06.03.2012 12:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Macaria shanghaisaria (Walker, 1861). Identified by Belyaev E. A., FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

06.03.2012 12:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Pachyerannis obliquaria (Motschulsky, 1861). Identified by Belyaev E. A., FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

06.03.2012 12:25, Yuri Semejkin:

Pieris melete (Menetries, 1857). Identified by Belyaev E. A., FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

06.03.2012 2:36, Peter Khramov:

The big website renewal
So, here the newly done:
Taxonomy
Lepidoptera taxonomy came to be more comprehensible
Better taxon delimitation including tribus, subfamilies and more
Thousands of new species and other taxa added
Taxonomy page now shows on two daughter taxa at once
Catalogue
Country/region list renewed
“Sort by” parameters are shown in the individual list on the right since there are already quite a few and it's expected to be more further on
Delays in showing search results now is nearly off. If your connection is presently as much fast as it used to be, you'll have the Catalogue page loaded few times faster than before
Bonuses
Imago flight period and larvae stage now are shown on a species description page schematically what's obviously more handy than plain text. Thanks to Alexandr Boldyrev for this idea.
All links have no slashes at the end anymore. If you for anyway end one with a slash, no biggie, you'll get automatically redirected to the right page.
Yet not as much fast as the Catalogue, other website pages also get loaded faster than before
Shortcomings
Photo uploading is still pending. Still you are free to add comments that's working properly.
Authors info not yet completely matched to texts and references.
Synonyms and species genus combinations are temporarily off to be shown
Shortcomings are due to be removed near days.
P. S. Taxonomy may happen to get buggy, like some taxa could be misplaced or something of the kind. If notice such, please, comment that very taxon or leave a message in the Guestbook, or directly e-mail me.
P. P. S. The English version of the website is still an old one including the old, not renewed taxonomy. If curious, compare these two to see how it actually was and what's now.

24.02.2012 14:42, Peter Khramov:

Lord, before the launch of an updated database on the website do not edit.

24.02.2012 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Now comes the final stage of a large database update site. To synchronize the ph of comments and the new base, the ability to download new pictures and comments of the user temporarily. Term launch of a new version of the database and the inclusion of all interactive - no later than 28 February.

24.02.2012 12:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

24.02.2012 12:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Hemithea aestivaria (Hubner, 1799). Identified by Belyaev E. A., FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

23.02.2012 14:51, Peter Khramov:

As the species gets added, I'll move that.

23.02.2012 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is Maniola jurtina. Seems its male.

23.02.2012 2:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to caterpillars.

22.02.2012 20:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

As caterpillars and note "mine" and a plant scientific name advisable. :)

22.02.2012 17:28, Peter Khramov:

As caterpillars?

22.02.2012 14:58, Andrey Ponomarev:

How to mark mines when uploading photos?

22.02.2012 14:56, Andrey Ponomarev:

:-) Surely not. Just a typo. This is a mine.

22.02.2012 9:48, Yuri Semejkin:

Comostola subtiliaria (Bremer, 1864). Identified by Belyaev E. A., FEBRAS Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences.

21.02.2012 9:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is it imago???

20.02.2012 16:41, Lev Bely:

Parasitic wasp tracks down the Large White butterfly (Pieris brassicae) female which is ready to lay eggs by its special anti-sex smell that repels males. The wasp hangs on the butterfly and being carried suchwise to the Brussels sprout plants where the butterfly lays eggs.
A joint research project* of entomologists at Wageningen University and the Free University of Berlin (Freie Universität Berlin) pointed out some curious details about wasp's demeanor. “Parasitic wasps often hitch a lift with butterflies, but in this case we discovered that the parasitic wasps make use of an anti-sex scent emitted by the butterfly. It is an ingenious form of scent espionage that enables the parasitic wasp to ignore the sex female butterflies that are still virgins, and therefore will not lay eggs,” explains Nina Fatouros of the Freie Universität Berlin.
With colleagues from Wageningen University they made a series of scent experiments with P. Brassicae and parasitic Trichogramma wasp to know what's actually the mechanism of such kind of espionage. When mating Large White butterfly males transfer to their partners benzyl cyanide that's meant to repel other males. The small Trichogramma wasp which is a natural enemy of the Large White butterfly feels that smell and discerns fertilized butterflies ready to lay eggs. “If we treat virgin female butterflies with the scent they suddenly also become attractive to the parasitic wasps,” says Fatouros. So, the wasp can easily track down the butterfly, then it hangs on it and being carried right to the place for egg-laying in a Brussels sprout plant. Once eggs have been laid, the wasp climbs down the butterfly and lays its own eggs in the butterfly's ones. “It’s a clever strategy as Trichogrammas are not known for their good flying,” according to Fatouros.
Entomologists expect that the understanding of how parasitic wasps find butterfly eggs will improve biological control of caterpillars and make it more efficient.
*The results of a joint research project of entomologists at Wageningen University and the Free University of Berlin were published on 17 February 2005 in Nature.
Resource, http://resource.wur.nl
National Geographic on parasitic wasp larvae life cycle inside the caterpillar body

20.02.2012 8:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Country at least???

19.02.2012 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Ok, everything's done.

19.02.2012 22:40, Andrey Ponomarev:

Mines and a caterpillar should be all moved to Phyllonorycter ulmifoliella.

19.02.2012 13:45, Andrey Ponomarev:

Caterpillar not agreed yet. Waiting for Oliver's reply.

19.02.2012 12:37, Peter Khramov:

Caterpillars are also to move, or?

19.02.2012 12:36, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for details. Moved.

19.02.2012 12:08, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Phyllonorycter ulmifoliella. Should be moved.
Identified by Oliver Rist at Lepiforum.de

18.02.2012 19:20, Lev Bely:

Cyborgias!

18.02.2012 16:22, Peter Khramov:

Seems we kind of need to consider inserting some tags in the blog...

17.02.2012 23:38, Lev Bely:


Hundreds of butterflies and moths flutter above pools of water, tropical trees and flowers in Judy Istock Butterfly Haven, a butterfly conservatory at The Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum. Whatsoever you happen to meet in the 2,700 square-foot greenhouse, it might turn out to be a true rarity, say, never seen in this region Blue Morphos (Morpho) and Banded Tigers (Dryadula phaetusa) from Central and South America; Rice Paper Butterflies (Idea leuconoe), the Great Egg Fly (Hypolimnas bolina), Blue Rims, and Chocolate Pansies (Junonia iphita) from Asia; 11 species of African butterflies, including Citrus (Papilio demodocus) and White Lady Swallowtails (Graphium angolanus). Sure, there is also world of marvelous local butterflies from the Midwest.
In April 2007 the Haven took in eight colorful birds, 4 males and 4 females, including the Central and South American purple honeycreeper, violaceous euphonia, red-legged honeycreeper, and the Australian gouldian finch. It's rather curious to watch these bright little birdies feeding on nectar or nibbling fruits laid out for butterflies.
Each week about a thousand of new chrysalides arrive at the conservatory to turn into butterflies right before your eyes. You can see as well hands-on exhibits that explain butterfly lifecycles, survival strategies, and Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus) migration. Everyone interested is welcome to know about the difference between butterflies and moths, what's actually metamorphosis, how butterflies feed and pollinate flowers, and what's their adaptation to habitat in the butterfly conservatory.
The museum has various educational programs as one called First Flight Butterfly Release, daily at 2 p.m., level 2, Judy Istock Butterfly Haven.
The Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum is open daily 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Saturday & Sunday 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
The Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum, http://www.naturemuseum.org
Photo: The Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum, http://www.naturemuseum.org
The Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum, Butterfly Haven

17.02.2012 21:31, Lev Bely:


MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) researches successfully implanted an electric neural probe into the body of a huge, fist-sized moth. That's it, a pull-string spy is ready to use.
Cyborg moth not only can be turned at will left or right, moreover, it could put more or less effort in that being even more manageable than a remote control plane. This is a first “offspring” of a big $18.5 million U.S. government project on controlling insects with electrical signals. And all this ado is aimed to get one beautiful day these mini-cyborgs started a government career as perfect super spies. The project is partially financed by the U.S. military.
The electric neural probe equipped with a battery is applied to a radio receiver for taking signals apart. The whole 0.5 gm “ammunition” is implanted directly into the insect abdomen. “Their wingspan is the width of your hand,” says Joel Voldman of MIT in a report in New Scientist. “These are big guys.”
“This is a major advance,” says neurobiologist Roy Ritzmann of Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland Ohio.
The researches together with neurobiologists are exploring if similar probes could be implanted into a human body. “It turns out that there are a bunch of nerves in humans that are about the same size,” says Voldman.
The project workout showed that the moth could be turned left or right getting signals into certain bundles of nerves. The electric probe is attached to the ventral nerve cord while five electrodes are fixed to different bundles of nerves inside the insect body. The turning radius can be changed with the current given.
The probe is made of a polyamide polymer coated with gold and carbon nanotubes. Such mixture guarantees the thing won't break down at crucial moment. Stay cool, spy!
The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk
Photo: The Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk
New Scientist magazine on cyborg insects

17.02.2012 17:49, Igor Sakhno:

No any. Caught even before I was born!

16.02.2012 15:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where is the label???

16.02.2012 15:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

16.02.2012 10:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Pennithera comis (Butler, 1879). Identified by Belyaev E. A., the Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEBRAS.

16.02.2012 10:28, Yuri Semejkin:

Pennithera comis (Butler, 1879).

16.02.2012 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Galina, the Synev catalogue says that H. lycaon is rather possible to meet in your lands (Astrakhan region/Kalmykia). If you still seriously doubt, please, let me know and the photo will be published for the website folks could confirm or deny the identifying...

16.02.2012 1:16, Peter Khramov:

Igor, hardly possible Vlad could make a mistake in identifying such species...

15.02.2012 23:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cast doubt aside.

15.02.2012 21:04, Galina Sokolova:

Thanks a lot for your help in identifying butterflies. Just one remark, some brown butterfly is named here as the Dusky Meadow Brown (Hyponephele lycaon) while there is no such things in our neck of the woods since it's kind of hot for them to be there.

15.02.2012 19:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Igor Sakhno, please, check out the Taxonomy page, all Satirinae here belong to Nymphalidae :)

15.02.2012 17:24, Igor Sakhno:

I somewhat doubt of whether could it be jurtina...

15.02.2012 0:42, Yuri Semejkin:

Expansion stretched from Spain to Japan: http://babochki.narod.ru/pi06.html.

14.02.2012 23:15, Peter Khramov:

These guys are truly nice...

14.02.2012 21:32, Lev Bely:


“Butterflies Near and Far” evening will be held on March, 14th in the Millers River Environmental Center, Massachusetts. This event will let you look into the world of Arctic butterflies, watch photos and listen to the expert naturalist Sue Cloutier.
The Athol Bird and Nature Club was founded in 1963 to “enhance the appreciation of natural history in the North Quabbin Region”. The club led by Robert Coyle, a 8th grades science teacher at the Athol Junior High School. Soon it became kind of a learning spot giving classes in astronomy, geology, geography, field ornithology. Bob left the school in 1988 and moved the club that already lacked place to the more spacious natural history museum. Last decade the club grew to a non-profit organization which unites today different people both local and all over outside the region. The Athol Bird and Nature Club is proud of it keeps the leadership role in natural resources education and conservation in the North Quabbin Region.
The club initiated creation of the Millers River Environmental Center where everyone is welcome to get some useful information or join one of environmental programs.
The Club's extensive Natural History Collection earlier kept in historic Memorial Hall in Orange county, North Carolina, was moved in 1999 to the Millers River Environmental Center where it's exposed nowadays.
The Athol Bird and Nature Club, http://www.millersriver.net
Photo: the Natural History Collection of the Athol Bird and Nature Club, http://www.millersriver.net
A guided walk in the Alan E. Rich Environmental Park with James Brown, one of the Bird and Nature Club members

13.02.2012 22:37, Lev Bely:

BBC Planet Earth did all possible to watch unwatchable: namely, they fixed a powerful Canon HJ40 super-telephoto lens to a helicopter, combed through steep and seemingly desolate rock slopes for hours and, finally, found few grizzly bears that climbed up that dizzily high, threw away mammocks of stone just to have a moth dinner.
BBC Planet Earth, moth-eating grizzlies

13.02.2012 21:56, Lev Bely:

The endangered El Segundo Blue Butterfly (Euphilotes battoides allyni) population increases in the Dunes Habitat Preserve at Los Angeles International Airport. The Los Angeles Times reports that a lately made survey shows the species population grew 8% since 2010, from 120610 to 125920 butterflies.
Sadly, first few years since it was established the preserve suffered several vandal attacks. Late night disturbers drove over here on all-terrain vehicles, cut the gate lock off and rode through the dunes destroying local plants including the coastal buckwheat endemic Eriogonum cinereum which butterflies vitally need. Since it initially has the fragile structure, the plant was amidst one of the most damaged.
“The present count has increased remarkably from the fewer than 500 El Segundo Blue Butterflies that existed in 1976 when it was among the first insects to be listed as a Federal Endangered Species,” Robert Freeman, environmental services manager for Los Angeles World Airports, said Friday.
LAWA officials said that they launched in 1986 the Dunes Habitat Restoration Project to encourage the coastal buckwheat expansion in El Segundo what's hoped to enhance therefore the E. b. allyni population growth since these butterflies go through their entire life cycle around this plant.
United Press International (UPI), http://www.upi.com, The Los Angeles Times, www.latimes.com
The Euphilotes battoides allyni story

12.02.2012 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not seen clearly. Seem to be Hesperiidae as its antennas say.

12.02.2012 4:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Inurois fletcheri. Not my identifying.

12.02.2012 4:16, Yuri Semejkin:

Pachyerannis obliquaria. Not my identifying.

12.02.2012 4:14, Yuri Semejkin:

Pachyerannis obliquaria. Not my identifying. I'll note who did it as he allows that. Not yet.

11.02.2012 22:19, Peter Khramov:

:--)) Superb.

11.02.2012 21:28, Lev Bely:

Well, how about identifying a butterfly chaotically flying away having no any helpful stuff as a hand net, for instance? Poor otters had no success in making their collection complete whatsoever hard they tried to. Still, they did it good:) The A-team!

11.02.2012 16:12, Peter Khramov:

Ha!

11.02.2012 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

"Nymphilidae" and the liquid of an "apdomen" truly rock.

10.02.2012 19:49, Lev Bely:


Late January the “Alive Tropical Butterflies and Moths” exhibition opened at the Volzhsky city Regional History Museum. The museum exposes about 10 species and over 100 specimens of butterflies and moths from Southeast Asia, South America and Africa, to name Nymphalidae, Papilionidae, Saturniidae. You can also see there a huge owl butterfly that can have a wingspan up to 7.3 inches.
Exhibition butterflies bred at farms in the Philippines and brought to Russia as pupae. There is an insectarium in the museum room to see how new butterflies and moths emerge from their cocoons. The show of the kind is made for the first time in Volzhsky city.
The “Alive Tropical Butterflies and Moths” exhibition will run through the middle of March. Opening hours: daily, 9—18. The round-up excursion is included.
The Volzhsky information website, http://www.volzsky.ru, Akhtuba Television, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7n7xLbNMmgU
Akhtuba Television on The “Alive Tropical Butterflies and Moths” exhibition

10.02.2012 16:55, Lev Bely:

The Insect Museum works since 1995 in the Akademicheskaya (Elizavetinskaya) gallery in Pyatigorsk, Russia. There is a collection of about 1000 tropical and Caucasian insects partly gathered by Valentin Tikhonov, entomologist and the owner of the collection comprised Caucasian and South American butterflies. Other exposition pieces are originally from tropical farms and private collections, some of them are over 100 years old.
Dried collection things are accompanied by the alive: you can see a few spider species, scorpions, cockroaches, stick insects, tropical bugs, as well as enjoy viewing chameleons, lizards, frogs and snakes.
The very gallery building is curious itself. The Italian Renaissance house of the Elizavetinskaya (its first name) gallery was made with mashuk stone in 1848—1850 yy. by an architect Samuil Upton. For this work and the Narzannaya gallery in Kislovodsk he was honored with an academic degree. In 1925 the gallery was renamed to Akademicheskaya after the Academy of Sciences that celebrated 200 years. Anyway, changing names couldn't change the beautiful panoramic view over the town and mountains what you can see outside the gallery.
Valentin Tikhonov, the entomologist and founder of the Insect Museum, got a Ph.D. in the Department of Entomology of the Faculty of Biology and Soil Science of Saint Petersburg State University. The Ph.D. topic name is “Lepidoptera: Geometridae of the Northern Caucasus”. Today he keeps up the Insect Museum and arranges expeditions.
The Insect Museum is open daily, 10—21.
Butterflies of the Republic of Dagestan, http://babochki-kavkaza.ru, KMV line, http://kmvline.ru
Photo of the museum exposition by Valentin Tikhonov.

08.02.2012 23:19, Lev Bely:


To meet the declining Californian butterfly Euphydryas editha bayensis, or rather its pupa, you should put yourself to Edgewood Park natural preserve in Northern California, turn your back to the sun and peer at the ground under your shadow. “It takes some practice, but when you see a little black object that stays black, that’s usually a checkerspot,” Dr. Weiss says, a conservation biologist from the Creekside Center for Earth Observation.
To bring the declining butterfly back to the park, last winter Dr. Weiss together with his colleagues “planted” there about 4000 caterpillars. Next few weeks he and volunteers that he calls “checker spotters” will be attentively looking into their shadows to find pupae of last year “seeds”. At the end of March thousands of bright orange-black spotted butterflies should emerge from those pupae.
At first sight this doing might seem rather boring and even meaningless, especially if one knows that checkerspot imagoes live just 10 days; still it's not that trivial. “The checkerspot has become the poster child for the effect of nitrogen on the environment,” Weiss elaborates. Other scientists also agree that for California's biodiversity it could be even more harmful than global warming.
Vehicle from nearby Interstate 280 lavishly “supplies” surroundings exhaust which contains nitrogen oxides that thrown on these lands up to 15 pounds per acre each year. The highway which passes along the western border of the park serves more than 100000 autos between San Francisco and San Jose on busy days.
Nitrogen oxides fertilize soil as well as a common fertilizer used for grass lawns. It makes non-native plants grow aggressively faster. “It’s a matter of competitive ability — the nitrogen-rich soil produces a very strong growth response in annual grasses, like Italian ryegrass,” Dr. Weiss said. “They thatch over and smother native plants.”
If native plants can't develop, so species that needs them begin disappear as E. Editha actually does. Weiss also says that nitrogen not only threatens butterflies but also ruins the ecosysteme, influences negatively human health, water and air.
Once there were lots of checkerspot butterflies in Edgewood Park, but in 2002 they vanished. After the program of mowing and weeding of non-native plants was successfully realized, it's made it possible to keep “invaders” under control and let local plants grow normally.
Biologists are looking forward to see 4000 new pupae over February—March. Weather influences a lot: ideal would be to have a wet winter and a cool summer since humid soil encourages the longer life of plants that butterflies and caterpillars do need. The mission will be deemed completed if about 2000 imagoes appear in Edgewood Park at the end of March. During 10 day life-cycle a checkerspot butterfly will find a couple, lay eggs on the native plantain having begun a new life-cycle, and then die.
Early pupae count promises the results will be as good as expected. Albeit Dr. Weiss and his colleagues will work few more “sowing” seasons to completely recover this species in the park.
The New York Times, http://green.blogs.nytimes.com
Photo: Stuart Weiss
Coyote Ridge, one of the Bay checkerspot habitats

07.02.2012 23:03, Lev Bely:


“A Butterfly's Wing” (Křídla Motýlí) exhibition is open this Thursday, February 9th in the Small Gallery (Malá Galerie) of the Museum of Kroměříž district. The exhibition is dedicated to Max Švabinský, a well-known Czech painter and graphic artist. It was arranged by painter's friends together with the museum to mark 50 years since his death (1873—1962), also 100 years since his daughter Zuzana Švabinská and a collector Josef Pola were born.
Two collections exceptionally match together: the first one comprises Švabinský's butterflies and flowers paintings, while the second is his own collection of butterflies and moths donated to the museum by a collector Josef Pola and his family. The exhibition presents butterflies and moths in all their beauty of velvety wings, multiple shapes and colors that always inspired poets, artists and collectors.
Max Švabinský fancied and collected butterflies since the very childhood and he used them in his works afterwards. At the exhibition you can see about 50 works including his famous Apollo (Parnassius apollo) and The Portegeuse Peacock (Inachis io) on a thistle, also books with Švabinský's illustrations such as The Blue Underwing (Stužkonoska modrá) by Petr Bezruč, The Butterflies Time (Motýlí čas) and The Blue Sky (Modré nebe) by a poet František Hrubín.
Same as Švabinský, Josef Pola also began collecting butterflies in his youth and devoted all his life to that. Thirty entomological boxes demonstrating the full butterfly life-cycle and even food plants are exposed at the museum. There are also some exotic and declining species. The specimens are originally from Chropyně and all Kroměříž district.
As a part of the exhibition, an art contest was organized for elementary and secondary school children, and anyone who'd like to participate. The winners will be announced on the first day of the exhibition at the vernissage in the Small Gallery this Thursday, February 9th, starting at 17:00.
The Křídla Motýlí exhibition is open till March 25th.
Muzeem Kroměřížska, http://www.muzeum-km.cz
Picture: Max Švabinský's illustration of the Motýlí čas book, http://matama.blog.cz

07.02.2012 13:54, Peter Khramov:

Why its of that color? While it's alive thing? Or it can fade out that much?

07.02.2012 13:30, Sergei Kotov:

Hylaea fasciaria (Linnaeus, 1758).

07.02.2012 10:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia hedonia.

06.02.2012 21:37, Peter Khramov:

Guys, is it possible to identify these fellows in blue stripe swimsuits that sitting on the fish (see photo)?

06.02.2012 21:26, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, it will be male.

06.02.2012 21:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

06.02.2012 21:13, Peter Khramov:

The magic is in that it doesn't have to be. If there is no such species, its name will be typed in italic and then the species will be linked as soon as it gets databased...

06.02.2012 21:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The species is not databased yet.

06.02.2012 21:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

To "uncertain".

06.02.2012 20:29, Lev Bely:

The first National Moth Week calls on everyone who is interested in moths to take part in moth watching and surveying. During the Week there will be arranged a “Moth Night” for both professionals and amateurs could communicate and exchange stuff and skills. You are also appreciated to organize your own “Moth Night” in nature: go bring friends together, turn the lights on, place them near a large, clear surface, say, a piece of cloth hung up in a tree. Send over your stories and photos to the National Moth Week curators.
The National Moth Week is aimed to moths and their biodiversity. Why moths? There are over than 10000 moths just in Northern America, very curious to survey, watch, shoot and admire. Moths may be seen all over from city centres and your own suburban backyards to outlands far away from civilization. Moths amazingly vary from bright, glare colors and patterns to quite obscure camouflage, and can be of different shapes and sizes from tiny as a pinhead to huge as a human hand.
Albeit moths are mostly night creatures, some of them fly in the daytime. As for night ones, it's not that hard to watch them as it seems, just put a light outside and check it up occasionally after dark. Sophisticated moth hunters usually use heavy weapons such as special lamps and lures to attract more moths.
“Moth Nights” are often prepared by nature lovers groups that you may easily join either for amateur watching or serious scientific observations. The National Moth Week makes it possible for various people partially or totally engaged in moths to meet up, exchange ideas and experience.
If you are willing to take part in the National Moth Week, please register yourself at the event website: http://nationalmothweek.org/register/.
National Moth Week, http://nationalmothweek.org/
2012 National Moth Week

06.02.2012 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, would you try to write down species using @s (check out the service topic) ;--)

06.02.2012 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Sure enough to move it to "uncertain" or just leave it in "undetermined" thus far?

06.02.2012 19:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hesperiidae, as for species, I pass.

06.02.2012 19:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suggest Neptis hylas sopatra. Neptises always blow my mind.

06.02.2012 19:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia hedonia.

06.02.2012 13:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "undetermined".

06.02.2012 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

To "undetermined". :)

06.02.2012 12:47, Peter Khramov:

See, links work good..) Goes from "undetermined" to C. pusaria.

06.02.2012 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined" to C. pusaria.

06.02.2012 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Goes from "undetermined" to C. pusaria.

06.02.2012 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined" to C. pusaria.

06.02.2012 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

06.02.2012 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "undetermined".

06.02.2012 11:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia, as for species, I'll specify that when I get home.

06.02.2012 11:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia atlites.

06.02.2012 11:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is not bolina but something of neptis. The species is identified wrong.

06.02.2012 11:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I've got such on my mounting board now. There are no other that similar to Uraniidae on Borneo.

06.02.2012 1:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cabera pusaria

06.02.2012 1:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cabera pusaria.

06.02.2012 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cabera pusaria.

06.02.2012 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cabera pusaria.

06.02.2012 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cabera pusaria.

06.02.2012 0:36, Peter Khramov:

In a bit it'll be possible to add new species to the database. Then I do that.

05.02.2012 15:45, Peter Khramov:

I'll move the photo as soon as the species gets databased.

05.02.2012 15:36, Alexandr Streltzov:

Apomyelois (Ectomyelois) pyrivorella (Matsumura, 1900).

05.02.2012 15:34, Lev Bely:


Look at this photo (the author is Renee Mertz) of a diorama at Vienna's Naturhistorisches Museum that shows butterflies sitting on a dead piranha and, seemingly... eating the poor fish?
The question is not so simple. In fact, it's not such dreadful as it would seem. There is nothing to be afraid of: butterflies and moths are positively not carnivorous by themselves. Anyway, that scene still looks freaky.
These butterflies are actually taken with a so-called “mud-puddling”, or just “puddling”. So what are they digging out? It appears that since they are pollinators and get their full ration from flowers, the nectar what they feed on lacks some vital nutrients that butterflies need to survive, so they just have to get this bit on the side. Choices vary depend upon a species, from small mud puddles with water that is rich of minerals to animal feces and, oh, dear! carrion.
As for the piranha, butterflies are surely not shredding it as predators do. Instead, they rather carefully “lick” it seeking for salts and minerals that the decaying flesh exudes. By the way, butterflies may be appealed with human sweat what they also do like. Just put your fear away and make a couple of good shots to show to your kids a real “carnivorous” butterfly:)
P. S. You are welcome to put your suggestions of what species are “piranha lovers” butterflies, just click on the photo to view it larger. Comment on the topic right here.
Boing Boing, http://boingboing.net
Butterflies licking salts of a dead fish body in the Bankhead National Forest, Alabama

05.02.2012 15:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.02.2012 15:31, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

05.02.2012 15:31, Alexandr Streltzov:

Diaphania nitidalis.

05.02.2012 15:30, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

05.02.2012 15:25, Alexandr Streltzov:

Dioryctria schuetzeella Fuchs, 1899.

05.02.2012 15:23, Alexandr Streltzov:

Zophodia grossulariella (Hübner, [1809]).

05.02.2012 12:10, Peter Khramov:

Well, if it should've been? Half of a neighborhood can use the same outer IP-address. Besides, many users have got dynamic ones...

05.02.2012 6:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good thing you did: I've got it fixed in my Opera since the last day. And obviously, it's not connected to an IP-address, cause I use DHCP.

03.02.2012 23:44, Peter Khramov:

If you frequently visit this website using your own, trustworthy computer (e. g., home), you may mark the "Remember me" checkbox to be always signed in to your Lepidoptera.pro account.
Please, pay your attention to the information below:
The feature works well for one user computer only, what means that if you check the box when visiting the website from another computer you'll get signed out from that one you've logged in before.
The signed in period is valid for two weeks since you've logged in last time.
If you encounter any troubles using this feature, please, let me know right here or by e-mail.

03.02.2012 21:57, Peter Khramov:

Matter of course, it's not. Anyway, it's nicer to hold this ignorant side than staying aside...)

03.02.2012 18:50, Mdsaiful Sakim: This species is identified correctly.

03.02.2012 18:48, Mdsaiful Sakim: This species is identified correctly.

03.02.2012 8:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There are regional lists, for instance, list of Bulgarian butterflies (Abajiev, 1992), or (even questionable), http://www.butterfliesofbulgaria.com/lumperslist.html, with an info of a supposed country habitat. Thus, the Fauna Europaea is not a panacea.

02.02.2012 21:38, Lev Bely:

Dmitry, thanks for correction, excuse my ignorance. Petr, update, please, the article if needed.

02.02.2012 21:07, Lev Bely:


On December, 25th Sori Yanagi, the Japanese designer and creator of the famous Butterfly Stool, died in Tokyo. He invented both simple and exceptionally elegant model performed with two pieces of moulded plywood that is fastened with brass rod. The stool shape reminds a butterfly's wings and at one time a traditional Shinto shrine torii gate. As Matilda McQuaid, the deputy curatorial director at the Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum says, the stool “epitomizes Yanagi's approach to design. He loved traditional Japanese crafts and was dedicated to the modernist principles of simplicity, practicality and tactility that are associated with Alvar Aalto, Charles and Ray Eames, and Le Corbusier.”
As a designer, Yanagi was quite multi-instrumental: for 60 years of designing he worked out various things such as tableware, furniture, autos, metro stations and even the torch for the 1972 Sapporo Winter Olympics. Yanagi's works combine inartificial lines, pure shapes, ascetism, limited materials and always an essential accent on a thing's beauty whatsoever practical or ordinary. His design perfectly endures the test of time and gets ageless through years.
Sori Yanagi took his inspiration from, as he called that, “anonymous” design: the Jeep, a baseball glove. In turn, he inspired young designers including Naoto Fukasawa, Tom Dixon and Jasper Morrison.
The Butterfly Stool as well as other Yanagi's works is in production today: Vitra, a Swiss manufacturer of designer furniture, makes also The Elephant Stool (1954); a stainless steel teakettle (1994) is bought every year by over half a million of Japanese that witnessing Yanagi's design is worth indeed.
The Butterfly Stool is included in “Plywood: Material, Process, Form” exhibition at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) in New York. The exhibition is open until February, 27th.
The New York Times Style Magazine, http://www.nytimes.com/pages/t-magazine

02.02.2012 17:03, Peter Khramov:

Well, here we come. Even moderators are not aware of the fact that an up-to-date areal description includes European countries only. As for Bulgaria, Fauna Europaea either says there is no such species at all. Neither doubtful nor questionable, just a straight "no". If they're just liars?

02.02.2012 16:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, I actually corrected that cause I read the source article. As for lepidoptera.pro, check out its subspecies areal expansion, it's elaborated well over there. As for general areal, that's clear Petr's blunder.

02.02.2012 14:47, Lev Bely:

Dmitry, I leaned upon the source article http://www.faralyaarthouse.com/butterfly_valley_faralya_fethiye_01.html that says that Archon apollinus is seen in Turkey and Greece only, and on the lepidoptera.pro species description, http://lepidoptera.pro/species/archon-apollinus/. Should the areal expansion be updated then (Q to Petr)?

02.02.2012 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to atlas.

02.02.2012 8:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

+The False Apollo (Archon apollinus), the latter is available to see in Greece and Turkey only.+ Also in Bulgaria, Iraq, Israel and Syria.

02.02.2012 8:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Attacus atlas female.

02.02.2012 6:04, Mdsaiful Sakim: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2012 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

01.02.2012 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

01.02.2012 23:04, Peter Khramov:

It works fine by my side. Check out your settings, can you hear other sounds?)

01.02.2012 22:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No sound.

01.02.2012 21:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Urapteroides astheniata.

01.02.2012 21:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Appias libythea female.

01.02.2012 21:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hypolimnas bolina.

01.02.2012 18:34, Lev Bely:

The Faculty of Biology was the first faculty of the university as it was opened in 1916. Today it consists of 9 departments which are the Department of Botany, Department of Zoology, Department of Ecology, Department of Biochemistry and Plant Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Human and Animal Physiology, Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Department of Biophysics, Department of Biomedicine, Department of Neurodynamics and Neurobiology (the three latter are structuredly at Biophysics and Biomedicine department). In 2010 the university entrance competition for places was 8,8 persons to the Biology program, 3,4 to the Biophysics and 9,1 to the Ecology.
In 2002 the Research Institute for Molecular Biology and Regional Ecology was opened by the Faculty, in 2009 the University got the National Research University status.
N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, http://www.bio.unn.ru
N. I. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod, the Faculty of Biology

31.01.2012 17:12, Peter Khramov:

There are two giraffes at the video thumbnail.

31.01.2012 16:47, Lev Bely:

Next few days and no more in the Perm city Butterfly Park you can see the alive Atlas moth (Attacus atlas) which is one of the biggest world's moths both by its total wing surface area and wingspan. The wingspan can reach 25cm and even more, females are bigger and heavier than males.
A. atlas lives rather short life due to its undeveloped mouthparts, moths can't feed and exist therefore just 1—2 weeks. Atlasses fly unsurely, rather flutter. Females don't fly away far from their chrysalises, instead they look for a comfortable place with air currents for their pheromones to be getting spread around so that males could detect that. The latter are able to detect pheromones at several kilometers apart from females.
The moth expansion covers an area from India to China. In India A. atlas is cultivated though not massively for its highly durable silk while in Taiwan they used moth cocoons as purses because of the same durability.
The Perm city Butterfly Park exposes South America, Central America and Southwestern Asia butterflies and moths. There is an insectarium in the conservatory where new butterflies emerge from their chrysalises. Besides, in the Park you can see Madagascar hissing cockroaches, bird-eating spiders, iguanas, Australasian tree frogs, various snakes, Lonchura birds, laughing doves, common carps, red-eared sliders and crickets.
The Perm city Butterfly Park, http://bater.ru/perm
Attacus atlas female

30.01.2012 23:22, Lev Bely:


The American Museum of Natural History in New York published a well-done book set 'The Exquisite Butterfly Companion: The Science and Beauty of 100 Butterflies' which includes a field guide to identify 100 butterfly and moth species plus 100 colored paper sheets with images of an each of 100 species. Images are perforated and can be used for making flying models of butterflies and moths, all necessary stuff is also inside the case. The book author is Hazel Davies, the Manager of Living Exhibits at the museum. The book set is available to buy at http://www.amazon.com.
The American Museum of Natural History was founded in 1869 and today it's one of the biggest and respected museums in the world. The museum is famous for its awesome exhibitions that attract tourists from all over the world. There is also one of the largest collections of dinosaur fossils. Most popular exhibition is the annual 'The Butterfly Conservatory: Tropical Butterflies Alive in Winter' which was opened once again at the museum last October.
You can walk around about 500 butterflies and moths of bright and irisated colors which fly freely amidst the tropical greenery of the conservatory where the 80-degree temperature is permanently kept. The butterfly exhibition is open till May 28th, entrance tickets are available to buy online at the museum website.
The American Museum of Natural History http://www.amnh.org, ScienceNews http://www.sciencenews.org, Amazon.com http://www.amazon.com
The Butterfly Conservatory: Tropical Butterflies Alive in Winter

29.01.2012 3:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

bryoniae at the sea-level (Vladivostok)? Quite doubtful.

29.01.2012 1:20, Lev Bely:

Thousands of butterflies and moths from all over the Mediterranean coast are available to watch in Turkey, near Fethiye, in the Butterfly Valley (Kelebekler Vadisi). To see the rare Jersey Tiger (Euplagia quadripunctaria) people take water taxis from Ölüdeniz or Fethiye, hike up and down dangerously steep cliffs and desperately paraglide off Babadağ mountain.
The Valley is actually a nearly 10ha nature reserve with a unique microclimate which is supported due to its favorable situation and waterfalls. Butterflies and moths go the full life cycle in the Valley. Since June up to October huge colonies of E. quadripunctaria gather over there. Withal you can watch about 35 butterfly and 40 moth species. Hundreds of lepidoptera sitting on slopes flutter in the air being disturbed by people's appearance or a sudden sharp sound.
You may stay at the very plain and modest Butterfly Valley lodge, 0538 511-64-54, as well as spend the night in your own tent right over there what is not forbidden. Uphill, there is Faralya village where you can find cozy and well-known George House, a family run guest house where they bake tasty bread, and in the evening time hosts with guests watch from above down the Valley and the Mediterranean sea.
As for species beyond the Valley, there are many of them, both rare and ordinary. It's rather common to meet in Turkey The Old World Swallowtail (Papilio machaon) and The Scarce Swallowtail (Iphiclides podalirius), in some parts of the country The Alexanor (Papilio alexanor) may be seen which is quite rare in Europe, also the endemic Turkish Meadow Brown (Maniola telmessia). Around Fethiye you can find The Meadow Brown (Maniola jurtina). The Apollo (Parnassius apollo) which is included in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is bigger there than in the rest of Europe, in Turkey it flies at 2000—2500m above sea-level. There are widely spread The Small White (Pieris rapae), Fiery Clouded Yellow (Colias eogene), The Red Admiral (Vanessa atalanta). The migrant Plain Tiger (Danaus chrysippus) is one of the most beautiful Mediterranean butterflies. There is also The Lattice Brown (Kirinia roxelana) and The False Apollo (Archon apollinus), the latter is available to see in Greece and Turkey only.
Lepidoptera species in Turkey tend to vary depend on what part of the country they habit: The Common Brimstone (Gonepteryx rhamni) on the north is substituted by The Powdered Brimstone (Gonepteryx farinosa) on the south as well as The (Eurasian) White Admiral (Limenitis camilla) is replaced with The Southern White Admiral (Limenitis reducta) while The Silver-washed Fritillary (Argynnis paphia) changed with The Cardinal (Argynnis pandora).
Most complete and systematic description of Turkish lepidoptera is given in the big three-volume Die Tagfalter der Türkei.
Faralya Art House, http://www.faralyaarthouse.com,
Butterfly Valley like a fairytale by Tore Kjeilen, http://looklex.com/turkey/butterfly_valley.htm
The Butterfly Valley, Fethyie

29.01.2012 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Lord, in comments to species fotam and topics in the Community are working autosubstitution for Latin species of butterflies (the same way as it has long plow with the addition of information for pages species): write two dogs in a row, then latniskoe name of the species, then another two dogs.This record will be automatically modified in reference to the views of the site (if there is one) or just in italics (if the form is not). Important: if the previous comment to this as, for example, fote already had the same name with a link, it is not necessary to mold it with dogs - let it be just text.

29.01.2012 0:09, Peter Khramov:

Goes to L. helmanni, "uncertain".

28.01.2012 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved out of "undetermined" to A. ferrugana.

28.01.2012 23:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris ferrugana.

28.01.2012 16:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Possibly, Aldania ilos.

28.01.2012 15:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sorry, that's Pieris melete male.

28.01.2012 15:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems like Limenitis helmanni male.

28.01.2012 15:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'd rather say it's Pieris bryoniae.

28.01.2012 15:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pieris melete.

28.01.2012 15:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pieris dulcinea.

28.01.2012 4:02, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Seems to be P. dulcinea, not sure though.

28.01.2012 3:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Again, this is either melete or dulcinea (don't know how to distinguish their spring generations). P. napi s. str. shouldn't have been in Prymor'ye.

28.01.2012 3:40, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Again, this is either melete or dulcinea (don't know how to distinguish their spring generations). P. napi s. str. shouldn't have been in Prymor'ye.

28.01.2012 0:04, Peter Khramov:

A to why then?

27.01.2012 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In Tae solid urban. All in asphalt and fields. Some trivial. Here Cambodia - a country still untouched jungle. True picture of butterflies there is almost there. Not until it was nonsense.

27.01.2012 22:11, Peter Khramov:

As the species gets databased after synchronizing the shot will be moved...

27.01.2012 21:55, Peter Khramov:

In Thailand, both nonche with TZ Butterflies? One Fautua, look, put all the same)

27.01.2012 14:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

P. dulcinea male.

27.01.2012 14:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thailand, Cambodia.

27.01.2012 10:17, Peter Khramov:

ABOUT! Congratulating! Photos - come with time; -) Where the result went something?

27.01.2012 8:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm at home. Photos are not brought, but the material collected.

26.01.2012 22:12, Lev Bely:

Every year since 2003 The Association for the Environment and Nature Protection of Germany (Bund fur Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland) chooses a butterfly or moth and announces it The Butterfly of the Year (Schmetterling des Jahres). This status is gained by some rare or declining species which has to be protected and sustained. Last year's butterfly was The Purple Emperor (Apatura iris). The Butterfly of the Year 2012 is The Small Emperor Moth (Saturnia pavonia) chosen by The Association together with The North Rhine-Westphalia Lepidopterists' Association (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Rheinisch-Westfalischer Lepidopterologen). The jury surveyed about 3700 local species, the most of those were moths and just 190 butterflies.
The Small Emperor Moth is known for its wings ornated with big eye-spots meant to make predators put off. Males are rather brightly colored in orange, white, pink and black while females are quite pale albeit notable for the wingspan which is about three inches larger compared to males.
In Germany Saturnia pavonia flies since April till May, imagoes don't feed in any way and live therefore just a few days after eclosion using reserves cumulated when being in a caterpillar stage. It's widely spread in Central and Northern Europe where the moth is common to meet in open fields, meadows, overgrown gardens as against cities, closed forests and cultivated agricultural landscapes.
The Small Emperor Moth population highly reduced in some German regions due to the landscape exhaustion and agricultural progress. The moth is included in the Vorwarnliste (IUCN Red List endangered species) as “a Near Threatened (NT)” taxon.
BUND NRW Naturschutzstiftung, http://www.bund-nrw-naturschutzstiftung.de
Saturnia pavonia male and female

24.01.2012 21:25, Lev Bely:

The Lepidopterists' Society was created in 1947 by students Charles L. Remington and Harry K. Clench in Cambridge, Massachusetts. They announced to their colleagues the intention to create a society which would be aimed at popularizing the studying of Lepidoptera. They decided to publish on a regular basis a thematic bulletin and also promote everyway the exchange of butterflies/moths and ideas between both lepidopterists and amateurs. Initially named The Lepidopterists' Union it was afterwards changed to The Lepidopterists' Society as it's known nowadays.
The first annual society meeting was held on December, 1950, and today there are members from over than 60 countries. This year meeting is organized together with SEL, The Societas Europaea Lepidopterologica, it will take place on July 23—29 at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Colorado. The info about registration, accomodation, time-line is available on the museum website http://www.dmns.org/lepidopterists-annual-meeting. The meeting agenda: http://www.dmns.org/media/466859/lepidopterists2012-15oct11.pdf. Online check-in is now open: $150 entrance fee early check-in till April, 30, $165 regular, $135 for students.
The Lepidopterists' Society, http://www.lepsoc.org/, Denver Museum of Nature and Science, http://www.dmns.org/.
The Lepidopterists' Society 2010 meeting in Leavenworth, Washington:

24.01.2012 17:51, Lev Bely:

According to a survey made by Butterfly Conservation and the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) nearly three-quarters of all UK butterflies and moths have shown its reducing over the last decade when even rather common Lepidoptera have depopulated by 24%.
The survey results show that the most reducing species are The Pearl-bordered Fritillary (Boloria euphrosyne), The Duke of Burgundy (Hamearis lucina) and The High Brown Fritillary (Fabriciana adippe) which has depopulated by 69%.
Albeit there are rarest species in this list which tend to vanish first because of special conditions they need to reproduce themselves properly and thus survive, others even less picky also keep on reducing such as The Small Skipper (Thymelicus sylvestris), The Common Blue (Polyommatus icarus) and even The Small Tortoiseshell (Aglais urticae).
Richard Fox, Butterfly Conservation surveys manager, says that the depopulating of the rarest butterflies is surely a problem to solve. But the more alarming fact is that those butterflies are vanishing which got well adapted in the past and felt good in these lands before humans came and began changing butterflies' habitats.
The survey also tells of a visible success in saving and multiplying of the rarest species. Amongst them is The Large Blue (Maculinea arion) which was revived in the 1980s after it had disappeared as a species. The key solution was a discovering of a clear interaction between this butterfly's caterpillars and some of ant species.
The list of reducing species also includes The Marsh Fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) and The Small Blue (Cupido minimus).
"We've got a good understanding of the ecology and how to look after the habitat for these species. What we really need to do now is to expand this UK wide and look at this more broadly."
BBC News, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/
Reader's Digest UK, Wildlife Monthly: July, of the UK species decline:

24.01.2012 17:37, Peter Khramov:

A new Lepidoptera user Lev Bely begins posting to the Community news and other curious stuff of butterflies and moths from all over the world. You are welcome to comment those same as all other Community posts.

23.01.2012 13:17, Yuri Semejkin:

Some Pyralidae of Udea genus. Identified by Kirpichnikova V. A.

23.01.2012 0:12, Peter Khramov:

With this synchronization Proust some tryndets. The more I do, the more there is: -)

22.01.2012 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

22.01.2012 15:10, Andrey Ponomarev:

Sorry, that's Lacanobia thalassina.

21.01.2012 20:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not sure whether it's P. melete or P. dulcinea... fifty/fifty... :)

21.01.2012 0:52, Peter Khramov:

Finally, to P. melete, "uncertain", or?

19.01.2012 13:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Herpetogramma magna. Identified by Kirpichnikova V. A.

19.01.2012 13:49, Yuri Semejkin:

Herpetogramma magna. Identified by Kirpichnikova V. A.

18.01.2012 9:55, Yuri Semejkin:

When an imago gets identified the rest is also may be added.

18.01.2012 1:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Assume, Evgeny might be right. I looked at http://www.euroleps.ch/seiten/s_art.php?art=pier_melete, so males happen to be like that. But it's hard to say for sure with no underside, albeit the small particulars still are in favor of Pieris.

18.01.2012 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Good, updating...

17.01.2012 23:55, Yuri Semejkin:

Neozephyrus japonicus.

17.01.2012 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I'll just be wandering outside the ring to wait for Alexandr's version as of that who identified.

17.01.2012 20:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

http://www.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxon=Pieris melete.

17.01.2012 20:00, Peter Khramov:

Might it really have such mighty veins?

17.01.2012 19:59, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This is surely not io. Most probably N. antiopa.

17.01.2012 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

17.01.2012 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

17.01.2012 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved then.

17.01.2012 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.01.2012 18:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, this is Pieris of the napi group.

17.01.2012 18:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Argynnis ruslana male.

17.01.2012 18:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Identified.

17.01.2012 18:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Kirinia eversmanni.

17.01.2012 18:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Kirinia eversmanni.

17.01.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

17.01.2012 15:29, Peter Khramov:

It'll be moved once the adding of species to the database gets enabled again.

17.01.2012 15:27, Peter Khramov:

Differences between this and other photos do way differ...

17.01.2012 15:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.01.2012 15:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.01.2012 13:08, Yuri Semejkin:

Herpetogramma magna Btl.
Identified by Kirpichnikova V. A.

17.01.2012 12:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Pleuroptua ruralis Sc (Sylepta ruralis). Identified by Kirpichnikova V. A.

17.01.2012 11:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Neozephirus japonicus Murrey.

17.01.2012 11:22, Yuri Semejkin:

Neozephirus japonicus.

17.01.2012 11:20, Yuri Semejkin:

Neozephirus japonicus Murrey.
Identified by Chistyakov Y. A., Institute of Biology and Soil Sciences FEB RAS.

11.01.2012 23:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.01.2012 22:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pieris dulcinea.

11.01.2012 22:33, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

11.01.2012 22:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved to caja.

11.01.2012 22:32, Peter Khramov:

Went to io.

11.01.2012 18:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, right: that's Phlaeas. Outta be moved.

11.01.2012 15:33, Sergei Kotov:

Arctia caja.

11.01.2012 15:31, Sergei Kotov:

Nymphalis io.

11.01.2012 15:28, Sergei Kotov:

Error! This is not Lycaena dispar but Lycaena phlaeas.

11.01.2012 11:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not so plain, there is also Aporia hippia but this one is crataegi.

11.01.2012 1:48, Peter Khramov:

So it's so plain then...

11.01.2012 1:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved to T. luctuosa.

11.01.2012 1:47, Peter Khramov:

Goes to T. luctuosa.

10.01.2012 22:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aporia crataegi.

10.01.2012 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tyta luctuosa.

10.01.2012 22:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tyta luctuosa.

09.01.2012 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, yes, at work: boredom and already blown away from the TV: After the house zomboyaschik the spirit can not bear.

09.01.2012 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Day without an Internet - at work on chtol?

09.01.2012 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Conceived with time. Without an Internet too worthless to sit for days sometimes. However, a very old pipe has died. IMHO deal also required (Inet, GPS, GLONASS, etc. goodies) :)

09.01.2012 19:05, Peter Khramov:

You would, Basil, Lucci used new thinking about the camera, not the toys. And then you have interesting views on fotah and quality often lame; -)

09.01.2012 15:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, I figured with him through a program Kies drove to all.
And this machine: http://devdb.ru/samsung_gt_n7000_galaxy_note
Fuse I'm at it. In my impression beast. Now tune (zamayalsya already).

09.01.2012 15:19, Peter Khramov:

I do not come across, but even on ordinary phones bundled almost always have to import a progda Autglyuki.

09.01.2012 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, everything is fine: just kind of put Thersamolycaena its author, because it is in the admin area and lay down, and I tried the technique.
Peter, the question was not on the butterflies. How to import contacts from Microsoft Outlook mail into the smartphone on Android directly from your PC bypassing Google account? I not faced problemkoy? And I do tea in these cases.

09.01.2012 1:31, Peter Khramov:

Well, if everything correctly transferred, so why are forgiving)

08.01.2012 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now two of the admin foty determined experimentally to Lycaena dispar (at work, try the new smart phone). I hope people will excuse me :)

08.01.2012 16:14, Peter Khramov:

True... Moved.

08.01.2012 15:09, Andrey Ponomarev:

I beg your pardon, but that's Pterapherapteryx sexalata.
Should be moved.

08.01.2012 14:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.01.2012 14:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.01.2012 14:09, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

08.01.2012 14:09, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

07.01.2012 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Yes, Alexander, new foty a species that is not in the database the site will hang until such time as synchronize with at least "Fauna". Now, the whole base of the work, so to make new forms - only further confuse the situation. Incidentally, the same applies to subspecies - until storing a one ...

07.01.2012 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

In the admin copper-butterfly Celastrina (Maslowskia) filipjevi, which is not in the database. Let it hang?

07.01.2012 19:18, Yuri Semejkin:

Would it be good to get genus and species said also.

07.01.2012 18:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is the same Geometridae :)

07.01.2012 18:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Can anybody elaborate on the difference between this shot and that one: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/plebejus-argus/.

07.01.2012 18:16, Peter Khramov:

Albeit there are no neighbour Lycaenidae at the moment. While they kind of have been. Miracles, pure ones.

07.01.2012 18:15, Peter Khramov:

It's just Yury didn't update a comment while uploading. It obviously was meant for a neighbour photo ;--)

07.01.2012 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Geometridae.

07.01.2012 17:41, Yuri Semejkin:

The background is a maple tree. I just moved it on a grass blade and looked for a good background next.

07.01.2012 17:18, Peter Khramov:

There is the following question: how important trehslovnoe name of the species in case there is a subgenus? Something like Lasiocampa (Macrocampa) grandis. Like, subgenus Macrocampa. Fauna so done.

07.01.2012 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Ok, as soon as I make adding of species enable again (if there will be no this species in the new database), we'll move it then.

07.01.2012 15:46, Peter Khramov:

Oh, that background, what a background over there...

07.01.2012 15:46, Peter Khramov:

Ematurga atomaria muale?

07.01.2012 15:44, Peter Khramov:

Calospilos sylvata?

06.01.2012 16:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Supposedly, Chasminodes albonitens.

06.01.2012 13:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cucullia (Cucullia) pustulata fraterna, Butler, 1878. Petr, as there is no this species databased, it might have been moved to fraterna first and got the database corrected then. :)

06.01.2012 13:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cucullia (Cucullia) pustulata fraterna, Butler, 1878, and I'm just talking of the very species name which Yury Semeykin mentioned.

06.01.2012 13:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Now there is no such species, Cucullia fraterna, this is an eastern Cucullia pustulata subspecies, the full name is Cucullia (Cucullia) pustulata fraterna, Butler, 1878. References: Fibiger B., Ronkay L., Yela J. L., Zilli A. 2010. Rivulinae — Phytometrinae, and Micronoctuidae, including Supplement to Noctuidae Europaeae, vols 1-11 / Ibid. Vol. 12. 451 р.
Witt Catalogue: Vol. 2: Cuculliinae I. A Taxonomic Atlas of the Eurasian and North African Noctuoidea. 2009. pp. 365.

06.01.2012 5:01, Yuri Semejkin:

The pupa raised of a caterpillar.

06.01.2012 5:00, Yuri Semejkin:

Cucullia fraterna. Identified by Matov A. Y.

06.01.2012 4:57, Yuri Semejkin:

Matov. A. Y. (The Zoological institute RAS) identified this species as Cucullia fraterna while it's supposed to habit only western Europe and not Vladivostok.

06.01.2012 4:52, Yuri Semejkin:

Matov. A. Y. (The Zoological institute RAS) identified this species as Cucullia fraterna. Expansion: the Altai region. General expansion: Europe, Russia (the European part of the Urals, Western Siberia, Russian Far East) China, Korea, Japan. References: Kononenko, 1998, 2003, 2005 yy. Weblink: http://www.bioaltai-sayan.ru/regnum/species_all_a.php?right=box-spec-a/cucullia.php&left=ago.php&species=cucullia_fraterna. As Matov A. Y. says, Cucullia lactucae habits only Western Europe. So should the species be changed, or?

06.01.2012 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, leaves "undetermined".

05.01.2012 23:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lithosia quadra male.

05.01.2012 15:15, Peter Khramov:

Not rose but orange, in fact. Anyway, the white balance was turned to cold, so...

05.01.2012 15:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hind wings are rose, what's that? Photoshop or just another form.

05.01.2012 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Correctly. And Erebidae here for a long time in the scoop stick: it is one of the examples.
http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=446650
IMHO the right thing.

05.01.2012 4:39, Egor Kovalyov:

The specimen which has uncommonly colored forewings.

04.01.2012 20:56, Eduardo Lucof:

Similar automedon! *

03.01.2012 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Due to some major renewals of the website species database the manual adding of species is temporarily unavailable. Thus, for a while there can be longer delays than usual in getting published photos of butterflies/moths which are not yet databased. Photos of already databased species are published properly, as always.

03.01.2012 22:52, Peter Khramov:

Now I synchronize database site faunaeur.org, because the functions manually add new genera and species temporarily disabled. As I completed yet - including reverse.

02.01.2012 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Ah, yeah, that's my blunt. They have such big differences in forewings that there can be no questions. Goes to M. jurtina.

02.01.2012 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Or Maniola jurtina (always confuse these), anyway not Coenonympha at all.

02.01.2012 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Or, males only have got those?

02.01.2012 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Meh, what about no spots on its hind wings?

02.01.2012 23:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

I vote for Maniola jurtina female :)

02.01.2012 23:30, Peter Khramov:

Seems to be lycaon rather than pamphylus, eh?..

02.01.2012 12:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.01.2012 12:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.01.2012 17:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

C New Year to all !!! It so happens that I met him at work (day were) so catching up :)
Dmitry, akrei waiting patiently in the wings!

31.12.2011 19:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Up to five I was in Russia

31.12.2011 18:01, Peter Khramov:

And you. Have a good hunting!

31.12.2011 17:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

All a Happy New Year and Merry Christmas! I will not be in the internet until 27 January.

31.12.2011 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spilarctia seriatopunctata by Synev.

31.12.2011 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Fool, there are different endings in various references, Spilarctia seriatopunctatum, the species is created already.

31.12.2011 13:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spilarctia seriatopunctata, that's an ending by Synev, there are different endings in various references. :(

31.12.2011 13:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/11666/.

31.12.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.12.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" so far.

31.12.2011 13:09, Peter Khramov:

Add a species, anybody...

31.12.2011 11:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Milionia philippinensis male.

31.12.2011 6:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to be. The angle is not handy though.

31.12.2011 5:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spilarctia seriatopunctatum, "uncertain".

31.12.2011 5:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Spilarctia seriatopunctatum, "uncertain".

31.12.2011 1:14, Peter Khramov:

Lycaena dispar male?

30.12.2011 21:25, Peter Khramov:

Corrected. Uploaded photos will be published today or tomorrow.

30.12.2011 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The shot date should be changed to 2009/08/23. I've got on my personal page this very caterpillar "extended".

29.12.2011 11:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way, if anybody has its common form? It'd be cool to get 'em here.

29.12.2011 1:17, Peter Khramov:

It won't take even one year to get him here!

28.12.2011 22:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It seems that the admin's been being on vacation till December 25, 2012 :)

27.12.2011 20:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. neumanni.

27.12.2011 20:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.12.2011 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

27.12.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.12.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Seems that.

27.12.2011 19:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined" to "uncertain".

22.12.2011 0:02, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ja.

21.12.2011 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

People who eat here? On molbiol go can not. All right?

21.12.2011 21:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I've got 11 on my personal page and about 50 are getting to come.

21.12.2011 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moreover, I've got 2 vague Ethiopia species on my personal page, Nolidae and Arctiidae. Perphaps, something will get clear as time goes.

21.12.2011 21:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hey, come on. Seems he's got things to do urgently. Will wait :)

21.12.2011 21:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)

21.12.2011 21:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No country for such admins.

21.12.2011 21:03, Peter Khramov:

So before I come back there might be some delays in photo publication and other comments.

21.12.2011 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's the sole Charaxinae I've got. However, before I was gifted lots of such souvenir stuff.

21.12.2011 20:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily! Sent you a mail.

21.12.2011 20:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is there anything interesting more???

21.12.2011 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, no matter, I added that. I promised to, whatsoever. That's good you reminded me cause I already forgot that.

21.12.2011 20:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Did not know that was the souvenir. Not insisted, just asked!

21.12.2011 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Specially as it's needed I poked out that souvenir thing this butterfly was put into with underside. Today I'll throw it in :)

21.12.2011 19:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is it possible to see the upperside of that whatever???

21.12.2011 15:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

To "uncertain". There are doubts.

21.12.2011 15:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There are no any other with such pattern there. May be put to "identified successfully".

21.12.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

So add a species then, anybody... P. S. To "uncertain"?

21.12.2011 13:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Still I lean towards Eulepidotis modestula.

21.12.2011 13:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And, by the way, to "identified successfully: http://www.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=318572.

21.12.2011 12:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside uploaded. It's labelled with the shot date which should be marked there too. I'll add genus now and apply the species therein.

21.12.2011 12:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will be a little bit later on, I'll add it today to my personal page. Just as I've got it right ready to hand.

21.12.2011 12:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agree, it's better to define it as neumanni. I'll add a species now.

21.12.2011 11:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suppose, that's Eligma neumanni, Rothschild, 1925.

21.12.2011 11:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Better to get an underside photo to be 100% sure.

21.12.2011 11:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I checked out Milionia genus so it turns out to be Milionia philippinensis.

21.12.2011 10:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

20.12.2011 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, that's a bad deal with all these Eligma, I found just two species looked nearly twins. So that's why it's in "uncertain". Wash-out... Even though these are big and bright-colored moths, there is minimum information about...

20.12.2011 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ugh, thanks. I suspected that too, but its darkness confused me either I couldn't find an underside photo.

20.12.2011 18:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Junonia sophia (Fabricius, 1793).

20.12.2011 18:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Good puzzle. If it was not the underside, I'd disclose that long time. This is a dark form of Junonia sophia (Fabricius, 1793).

20.12.2011 14:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Same as #7174 ???

20.12.2011 13:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Will check it out at home.

20.12.2011 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, thanks.

20.12.2011 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of a butterfly on #11616 photo.

20.12.2011 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Understood

19.12.2011 23:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The genus is right. But species???

19.12.2011 22:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vague genus. Didn't find references of that.

19.12.2011 22:44, Peter Khramov:

People, please understand the views in the admin.

18.12.2011 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Might be moved to "identified successfully", I think?
I relied on this when identifying: http://www.drlegrain.be/0nyungwe/jour/Pierinae/Pierinae.html#mylothris.

17.12.2011 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of the #11598 moth.

17.12.2011 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of a butterfly on #11600 shot.

17.12.2011 17:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of a #11602 butterfly.

17.12.2011 13:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

16.12.2011 18:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

OK. Will get in touch. I'll take all.

16.12.2011 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

May be moved.

16.12.2011 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of a male on #11565 shot.

16.12.2011 16:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, thanks for identifying! Just as I'm ready to share three items of this species (this is a sole butterfly which came not single). But I'm interested in trading not selling. Let's deal it by e-mail, if needed.

16.12.2011 13:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You did it right: this is the underside of a butterfly on #11574 photo.

15.12.2011 15:05, Peter Khramov:

Aye, thanks, moved out of "undetermined".

15.12.2011 15:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully" analogued to a photo nearby.

15.12.2011 15:04, Peter Khramov:

Ok, to "identified".

15.12.2011 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

May be moved to "identified successfully".

15.12.2011 14:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Done.

15.12.2011 14:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Will be able only in the evening.

15.12.2011 13:58, Peter Khramov:

Guys, add a species thus, if it's so straight indeed...

15.12.2011 13:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily! Don't you sell Ethiopia endemic ones???

15.12.2011 13:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Anything but Acraea necoda male.

15.12.2011 13:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Anything but Acraea necoda male.

15.12.2011 13:35, Peter Khramov:

If "uncertain", new species needed to add.

15.12.2011 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, when new species - at particularly Wellcome.

14.12.2011 23:24, Peter Khramov:

Done. It's possible now to sort photos by also its angles and specimens (imago). Besides, there is a new angle type available called "supermacro" meant for super blow-ups when there is only a butterfly/moth fragment shot.

14.12.2011 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hapigia annulata, Schaus, 1905?

14.12.2011 17:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. I was there myself two new species from Ethiopia tossed. One undefined. Here I bummed materiyalchikom. True quality of the majority of butterflies are not so hot, but the species seems to have not been on the site.

14.12.2011 17:42, Peter Khramov:

Basil, all the rules and with a view, and a photo. I recall that in the admin's part foty are not yet published, that is, after they were binding to the form of the admin they go, but the gallery still appear only after publication.

14.12.2011 10:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, something photo of the admin did not survive.
I'm really kind of made: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/euplagia-splendidior/

14.12.2011 6:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.africanmoths.com/index.html.
The website about African Heterocera. Seems helpful.

14.12.2011 0:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leave it like this. That's female so even boiled it will be hard to identify if Sergey caught only one. 70% sure that's identified right.

13.12.2011 23:18, Peter Khramov:

By geography ;--) Put to "identified"?

13.12.2011 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Signed...

13.12.2011 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Hey, I know the fella!" cause that's me who identified it :)

13.12.2011 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

13.12.2011 20:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, figure out authors by mistakes? :)

13.12.2011 17:56, Peter Khramov:

Uh-huh, done.

13.12.2011 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, please, correct its type, this is not alive one :) Seems some bug.

13.12.2011 12:33, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, was that your comment?

12.12.2011 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are only four species of this Eupista genus in Ukraine and ornatipennella solely is rather widespread. Most probably, this is that species not yet mentioned in references at Odessa region though. :) They don't differ but with genitalia.

12.12.2011 14:50, Peter Khramov:

So "uncertain" then.

12.12.2011 9:41, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Euproctis similis, probably, of the last age (the red pigment is less). But there should be already next generation in junior ages in September, this one seems to be late from the previous brood... Suppose, it's damaged with myco or something (looks unhealthy, faded, with no brushes, in unnatural pose).

11.12.2011 19:29, Peter Khramov:

Tatiana, did I get it right that you figured out Euproctis similis, or?

11.12.2011 12:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.12.2011 12:12, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Approve the author's version Gynaephora selenitica (Esper, 1783).

11.12.2011 12:10, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. rumicis.

11.12.2011 12:07, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Acronicta rumicis L.

11.12.2011 11:52, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain"?

11.12.2011 11:49, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Smerinthus..., probably, S.planus.

11.12.2011 11:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.12.2011 11:45, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

11.12.2011 10:03, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Cucullia lactucae ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) (seems to be sitting on lettuces).

11.12.2011 9:58, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Two glands on next-to-last segments mean Lymantriidae, bushy hair and locks of tough hair plus bristles mean Clostera, orange spinal stripes and blacky-grey warts with locks of compound stuff as white fleecy bristles mean Sphrageidus similis (Fuessly, 1775).

09.12.2011 13:47, Peter Khramov:

Yep, it's been updated just now there too.

09.12.2011 8:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It'd be good to correct that also in English version.

08.12.2011 12:20, Peter Khramov:

The geography corrected.

08.12.2011 12:20, Peter Khramov:

The geography corrected.

08.12.2011 12:20, Peter Khramov:

The geography corrected.

08.12.2011 9:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The Arfak Mountains are not located in Papua New Guinea but in its Indonesian part. We discussed that already!

08.12.2011 9:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The Arfak Mountains are not located in Papua New Guinea but in its Indonesian part. We discussed that already!

08.12.2011 9:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The Arfak Mountains are not located in Papua New Guinea but in its Indonesian part. We discussed that already!

05.12.2011 18:35, Peter Khramov:

I corrected that for now, if you get some ideas more, suggest.

05.12.2011 18:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

These are photos "in nature":
http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/11497/
http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10888/.

05.12.2011 15:31, Peter Khramov:

Agree, there is some mess indeed.
So what about this, http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/11497/, is this a "collection item"?
And this photo http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10888/, is it "in nature"?

05.12.2011 14:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Was going to write the same, "dried" butterfly sounds silly. It should be named "collection item".

05.12.2011 2:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

I meant, let's change "alive butterfly/moth" and "dried" to "photo in nature" (even for raised at home) and "collection item" (may be skipped).
I confused a little bit above. :)

05.12.2011 2:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, the "dried" type is somewhat... reminds dried fish. Maybe, use instead "photo in nature" and "collection item". Otherwise it sounds weird. We happen to shoot in nature a died butterfly too, even already dried. Or it's better to use just "photo in nature". "Collection item", as an alternative, may be skipped. Dried butterfly, hm....

03.12.2011 23:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Want to Cambodia too!

03.12.2011 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Since now there will be some new features shown at each photo page such as if this butterfly/moth is alive or dried, and what's exactly depicted, the upperside or underside. Before authors themselves already could add this information while uploading photos and, as the editor updates older shots with such data, there will be a new option enable to choose photos with these characteristics.

03.12.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Wow, Cambodia does seem so juicy.

03.12.2011 15:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cool underside :)

03.12.2011 2:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

NOTODONTIIDAE, Heterocampa genus.

03.12.2011 2:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

NOTODONTIIDAE, Heterocampa genus.

03.12.2011 2:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

NOTODONTIIDAE, Heterocampa genus.

03.12.2011 2:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

NOTODONTIIDAE, Heterocampa genus.

03.12.2011 0:39, Peter Khramov:

There were problems with the availability of the site at the time (not just at startup ph). At about 11 pm Moscow time all OK.
Lord, new kinds of admin Get pliz.

02.12.2011 22:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

500 Internal Server Error when trying to load the new ph. constantly knocks registration.

02.12.2011 10:33, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

02.12.2011 10:33, Peter Khramov:

Ok, corrected.

02.12.2011 8:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And this is Catopsilia scylla male.

02.12.2011 8:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Fault, this is Catopsilia scylla.

01.12.2011 12:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved till to "uncertain".

01.12.2011 0:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, Spirama helicina looks more similar.

30.11.2011 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

The same at funet.fi, but there are lots of species. I added one to the catalog, just in case. :)

30.11.2011 22:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

If look at the serious website jpmoth.or, possible to say this is Spirama helicina (Hubner, 1831), http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/09Catocalinae/framepage%20catocalinae2.htm, another retorta: http://www.jpmoth.org/~dmoth/80_Noctuidae/09Catocalinae/framepage%20catocalinae2.htm.

30.11.2011 16:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm not a Noctuidae pro. If it was something of diurnals, I could say 100% sure. There only guesses. Wait for.

30.11.2011 16:47, Peter Khramov:

Enough for moving from undetermined to uncertain, or not?

30.11.2011 16:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If I'd only knew where it from. Judging by other species, this is Southeast Asia. Supposedly, Speiredonia (Spirama) retorta.

30.11.2011 16:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male — m
Female — f

30.11.2011 16:25, Evdokia Alexandrova:

Woe, the species is not identified. Can't close the collection.

30.11.2011 16:23, Evdokia Alexandrova:

We measured the wingspan, it's 12,5cm. Where it was caught, don't know, we bought that long time ago, already dried. I wonder how to mark male with one letter for a collection?

29.11.2011 23:40, Igor Sakhno:

Yes, they are such!

29.11.2011 8:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Wouldn't have I been doubtful about that, but it could be better to have the topside to look at.

29.11.2011 7:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'll add that later on. Have no time to reshoot it. Any doubts?

28.11.2011 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to "identified successfully".

28.11.2011 21:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, I'd better move to "uncertain" that one which Vlad identified for Andrey, it looks questionably too dark. But it's just my suggestion. :)

28.11.2011 20:58, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain"?

28.11.2011 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

This genus is generally hard thing :).
But this seems to be Eucosma lacteana.

28.11.2011 15:20, Peter Khramov:

Removed.

28.11.2011 12:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! I finish species of Appias. Get jamb Appias sylvia (Fabricius, 1775)

28.11.2011 9:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is it possible to look at the top side???

28.11.2011 2:00, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. tristata, "uncertain".

27.11.2011 23:33, Maria Pozdnova:

Presumably, epirrhoe tristata.

27.11.2011 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks, moved to E. sanguiflua.

27.11.2011 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Gah, 4 days already gone and there are no other opinions :--) Actually, it was put to "uncertain", mind that. As soon as there are other suggestions, we'll look it over.

27.11.2011 21:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Species added.

27.11.2011 21:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I didn't see it alive. If the author says surely the stripes are white, so that's 100% curius.

27.11.2011 21:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No need to move, I'd rather know what our Saturniidae experts' would say. I just suggested that blindly.

27.11.2011 20:18, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, anything to say or leave it like this?

27.11.2011 20:17, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, I added the genus but the species. Would you do that along with the source?

27.11.2011 20:16, Peter Khramov:

To go.

27.11.2011 20:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.11.2011 20:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.11.2011 1:37, Peter Khramov:

With regards megasinhronizatsii. Several times already looked all so that's about ready, but in fact it turns out that everything is not so optimistic. But after next week I will be ready Sinev in decent form and Fauna Evropea ready for a long time.With funetom prospects murky, so I think it is not necessary to wait, but it is necessary to synchronize that is. Question: Who has ideas like this (synchronize different databases: Lepidoptera.ru + Sinev & Co + Faunaeur.org) can be simplified / automated or no brainer manual search of all sorts / species anyway you can imagine?

27.11.2011 1:22, Peter Khramov:

Uh-huh, right, thanks. Vlad Proklov confirmed the identifying.

25.11.2011 22:53, Maria Pozdnova:

Maybe, Epirrita autumnata.

24.11.2011 4:43, Olga Averyanova:

Originally the wing stripes are colored white (there they might seem different because of the background color), I've got a poor photo made the same day, in shoals, where the stripes are of bright white. Second difference we can see on the shot shown is in its clearly seen transparent fringe at the white stripes frontiers on a forewing. Also, there are distinctions between genitalia, whatsoever, I keep on catching...

23.11.2011 23:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Antheraea larissa??? female.

23.11.2011 23:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Antheraea larissa??? male.

23.11.2011 23:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

23.11.2011 23:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Appias nero male.

23.11.2011 23:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Erasmia sanguiflua.

23.11.2011 22:58, Peter Khramov:

Photos which you add to the website are not published automatically. First they are moderated and, if needed, additionally retouched. Besides, they get marked with copyrights. After all that they are available for seeing at the website.
P.S. Your shots are already published.

23.11.2011 22:55, Peter Khramov:

After you having published your photos at the website, people can comment those and also identify what are the species on the shots shown. If you are aware of where the butterflies/moths were caught, please, add comment with this info to your photo so as it would be much more possible to identify that.

23.11.2011 22:54, Peter Khramov:

There are not 2 times the book's title. In general, zvyaknu and explain. And the future will have more detailed instructions to write to me then that, if ...

23.11.2011 22:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Himself doper. Sheepish somehow twice to specify the name of the book (in other source is not added). I do not scan pages from a year edition of this book! How to live ?? 7

23.11.2011 22:15, Evdokia Alexandrova:

I rather have a request a little bit different)
How can I get my photos would be seen to all?

23.11.2011 22:13, Evdokia Alexandrova:

Dear community, please, help me to identify species I added!

23.11.2011 22:03, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, call tomorrow and I will explain everything. Looks just neponyatki some, because the point is that now do not need to drive five times the name of one and the same source ...

23.11.2011 20:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The author was helped with identifying at molbiol.ru. What's better for us, that's an another question.

23.11.2011 20:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Today, after a long break, he decided povbivat subspecies.
With the source of literature complete crap! At first he tried to enter a line in podvidah- FIG. Once again there-zhe FIG.
I think you need to enter from the page literatura- three times poproboval- hell again!
In short nifiga not understand, as I enter a new subspecies. Interface naredkost became inconvenient.Tediousness of some sort.
Interest drive subspecies disappeared after 15 minutes lost time- result = 0
Five times to drive Bozano GC. Guide to the Butterflies of the palearctic region. Satyrinae. Part 3. - tiring. Especially when you can not see the result.

23.11.2011 20:02, Peter Khramov:

In fact, it would be better to have curius ;--) Will see what the author says...

23.11.2011 11:46, Peter Khramov:

Ok, the person who identified is changed.

23.11.2011 11:45, Peter Khramov:

It is understood that for them Russian geography does not prescribe. This is the people annealed and serious work like ...

23.11.2011 8:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The species is identified by Evgeny Karolinsky, 2011/08/12.

23.11.2011 2:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

So far, we have not found :)

23.11.2011 1:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems to me it's rather green Lamproptera meges, not a white Lamproptera curius.

23.11.2011 1:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Don't make haste, colleagues might suggest different ones.

23.11.2011 0:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved to pamphilus as well as the photo http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9880/.

23.11.2011 0:58, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to pamphilus.

23.11.2011 0:56, Peter Khramov:

Ie those species that are not stamped regions in Russia simply does not?

22.11.2011 23:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Coenonympha rhodopensis
Coenonympha arcania
Coenonympha leander (last three are out at once)
Coenonympha orientalis (also passes by)
C. thyrsis which is already mentioned there doesn't differ to Coenonympha pamphilus f. lyllus but with its genitalia (Boillat 1986).
So, having eliminated all those, we've got Coenonympha pamphilus f. lyllus.

22.11.2011 23:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, what about the directory blue. The basis was the Highest European list, simply forgot to remove part of the species, when inserted at the level of regions. Mistake when writing. If I am not mistaken in leaf rollers such graphs there really is not one.

22.11.2011 23:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Let's look through Bokhanov's catalog. In Croatia there are such species as
Coenonympha rhodopensis
Coenonympha glycerion
Coenonympha pamphilus
Coenonympha arcania
Coenonympha orientalis
Coenonympha leander.

22.11.2011 21:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Soo weird pamphilus.

22.11.2011 21:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

yes, only 100% do not know where and when.

22.11.2011 20:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Turns out like nothing but this.

22.11.2011 17:52, Peter Khramov:

To pamphilus, "uncertain", or?

22.11.2011 17:18, Peter Khramov:

At you moved to Africa in February or something? And in general, I think, in February or March meeting bu.

22.11.2011 16:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Me with 1.01.2012 to 23.01.2012, hopefully, will not be in Russia.

22.11.2011 15:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It seems rather to be Coenonympha pamphilus.

22.11.2011 13:59, Peter Khramov:

People, approve or...

22.11.2011 4:19, Marija Jaunkunga:

Looks very similar to Macaria signaria.

22.11.2011 1:46, Peter Khramov:

Excellent.

21.11.2011 15:23, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, what's about your checking?)) Any conclusions?

21.11.2011 13:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Arrange both Moscow and Nizhny. With a probability of 70-80% can after 15 January to March inclusive.

20.11.2011 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

20.11.2011 10:40, Andrey Ponomarev:

Petr, hi. That's my blunder, I've got it while uploading even though having checked. This is Eriopsela quadrana.

20.11.2011 1:53, Peter Khramov:

People who are aware of the thread, which means option in the directory blue, when the species listed in the table, but none of the regions have not put down neither plus nor a question mark?

20.11.2011 1:52, Peter Khramov:

Dim, who would doubt! )))

20.11.2011 1:28, Peter Khramov:

Andrey, seems you made a mistake while uploading?

19.11.2011 16:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm for Nino

18.11.2011 19:14, Peter Khramov:

Uh-huh, deleted.

16.11.2011 12:41, Andrey Ponomarev:

Petr, there are same photos in two doubles, so one couple of them should be removed. That's my mistake, I didn't check it while uploading. Sorry.

13.11.2011 16:54, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, thanks. The photo goes to O. sieversii.

13.11.2011 16:46, Sergei Kotov:

Odontosia sieversi (Menetries, 1856).

12.11.2011 21:27, Peter Khramov:

Fine! I see pics, no failures. Hopefully, I will publish these the soonest time.

12.11.2011 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm now doing the free Avast, this might stumble somehow (I'm about to change that soon to the favorite and reputable Dr. Web).

12.11.2011 16:10, Andrey Ponomarev:

Whoa, whoa. Added 130 Noctuidae photos 1280 pix on the long side. Petr, there might be some errors, I'll fix that if you notice. Also, big thanks to all those who assisted in species identifying. Huge regards, Andrey, or even just Gennad'iych for few. :-)

12.11.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

I've got Andrey's mails in a normal way (using Kaspersky antivirus).

12.11.2011 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrey, that's even weird. Mine had such a big reaction. Heuristics blocked that completely. The file attached seems to be clear though. Weird.

12.11.2011 12:39, Andrey Ponomarev:

Vasily, I checked my computer, no viruses, nothing.

12.11.2011 2:01, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

12.11.2011 1:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrey is right, Plusia putnami.

11.11.2011 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Andrey, your mails are being blocked by my antivirus (can't get it thus): you'd better scan your system for some "evils".

11.11.2011 16:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Won't insist (I might have been wrong): what do people suggest?

11.11.2011 16:32, Andrey Ponomarev:

Suppose, that's Plusia putnami. The first lower line at the corner of its wing is short compared to Plusia festucae which has a way longer one.

11.11.2011 16:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you know, I never mind!
Unfortunately except Moscow never can. Associates work and grandmother (blind 94 years) for which it is necessary to take care of, and no one but me.

11.11.2011 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Lord!
There is a proposal to organize a small meeting of moderators and active users of the site to discuss the pressing issues on the site (thanks to the time just a bunch of updates work) and simply live communication.At the same time I have an opportunity to get hold of a few hotel rooms for those who come from other cities, they do not have to worry about spending on lived. Sinceour people are living in different regions, it is looking for some this topic much in advance (assuming that the gathering should take place now in after the New Year, and maybe even a thread somewhere in February or March). Offhand geographically loom the following options:
1. Moscow.Because it is easily accessible (transport center), one of the people in general live here or nearby, because there is, what to see (those who did not);
2. Nizhny Novgorod. Because there is a fairly large fraction juzverej. Because it is fairly easy to reach directly, through Moscow - also easy on the Sapsan.Because in Moscow (guess) everyone was, and HH - not all, and therefore kulyutornaya program can be interesting.
In both cities, I often am, but because with the organizational point of view, I do, again, it's easier. But if someone has other options - Wellcome, offer. As usual - all obsuzhdaemo.
I am waiting for your comments.

11.11.2011 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Hee hee. With TZ nastroekt bannerorezok standard - it's not a banner, and the usual picture. Actually, with him and I do not have a reference anywhere.

11.11.2011 14:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you! And though I'm not really know anything about these matters, "bannerorezki" it did not take even.

11.11.2011 14:26, Peter Khramov:

It makes it so that those who are logged in, it never appears without any adjustments. I think this is a normal variant.

11.11.2011 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh do to ACOM when under it was not visible. And that hurts the eyes.

11.11.2011 13:27, Peter Khramov:

Yes, Basil, I hung a banner. Without the policy would be happy to, but that's where we vish right now, no policy that? .. As for the convenience of the site - a little later made the setting for those who came in to my account online - show banner Ali did not show it. For those who are not logged in - it will spin up to 3 numbers. However, as now, not all pages.

11.11.2011 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, do you put a banner? Mozha remove politics from here?

10.11.2011 23:36, Peter Khramov:

Bah. At least, drifting isn't one-way ))

10.11.2011 22:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

And this is the very Choerocampa porcellus,
one is to go there, and that one is here. :)

09.11.2011 21:47, Peter Khramov:

The background is stunning.

09.11.2011 21:47, Peter Khramov:

The Lion Kuing, naturally.

09.11.2011 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, photo moved to C. lacunana. Will be added to Syricoris genus as the database is updated as usual.

09.11.2011 13:59, Peter Khramov:

Thanks. Moved to "undetermined".

09.11.2011 13:57, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the remark.

09.11.2011 13:56, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to D. elpenor.

09.11.2011 13:55, Peter Khramov:

So what, people, to "uncertain" or not yet?

09.11.2011 13:54, Peter Khramov:

To males.

09.11.2011 13:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

09.11.2011 13:53, Peter Khramov:

To males.

09.11.2011 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to males.

09.11.2011 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Went to males.

09.11.2011 13:53, Peter Khramov:

To males.

09.11.2011 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

09.11.2011 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Went to males.

08.11.2011 18:11, Vlad Proklov:

Yes, and both belong to Syricoris genus.

08.11.2011 18:10, Vlad Proklov:

Andrey is right.

08.11.2011 18:10, Vlad Proklov:

Definitely not E. faromosana, and whether Pammene sp. or Epiblema sp.

08.11.2011 13:00, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is not Enarmonia formosana. formosana has no white spot.

08.11.2011 12:54, Andrey Ponomarev:

This is Celypha lacunana.

07.11.2011 15:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

06.11.2011 15:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, Deilphila elpenor.

06.11.2011 14:41, Nikita Kulanov:

Isn't that Deilphila elpenor, is it?

04.11.2011 19:48, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yes, caecus it is.

03.11.2011 21:34, Maria Pozdnova:

By Lampert, 2003, it suits S. caecus: there is a spur under the top of its forewings and purple-blue spots on the hind wings are not arranged in a full circle.

03.11.2011 20:30, Maria Pozdnova:

Looks alike Spilosoma lutea. The head isn't seen, but there is a white line on its side.

03.11.2011 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

03.11.2011 9:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

03.11.2011 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

03.11.2011 9:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

03.11.2011 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

03.11.2011 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

03.11.2011 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male too.

03.11.2011 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Man.

01.11.2011 21:41, Peter Khramov:

A car advert...

01.11.2011 21:41, Peter Khramov:

Alien...

01.11.2011 6:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

31.10.2011 10:16, Peter Khramov:

If anybody needs one (in Saint Petersburg), please, take it out not to get lost.
Connect by e-mail fjv#mnsspb.ru ("at" instead of "sharp"). The contact person is Fedosov Y. V.

29.10.2011 2:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

The color of hind wings can vary much from very light to dark grey, and females are colored even darker. I didn't boil females. leuconota is not a synonym to latesco, just before these moths from Ukraine were named such. Now the puzzling thig is what's actually in Ukraine? latesco and/or trisignata. :)

28.10.2011 22:58, Sergey Novitckiy:

No, just wide-open. I went by the color of the hind wings when identifying, P.latesco has light ones (at least, by Klyuchko book "Noctuidae of Ukraine", where leuconota also mentioned as a synonym to latesco), and my item does dark ones (I'll upload tomorrow its wide-open photo; I saw dark hind wings at other websites of trisignata). I might have out-of-date info. Besides, latesco seems to be a transcaspian species, and trisignata is a south-eastern European one which lives also in Ukraine. Alexandr, if you are agree, I'll send you the item for identifying. You're most probably right. Just hind wings are not enough, that should be surely boiled!

28.10.2011 22:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

No antennas seen, so let's not.

28.10.2011 22:27, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

28.10.2011 22:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.10.2011 22:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.10.2011 22:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.10.2011 22:24, Peter Khramov:

Should get changed?

28.10.2011 22:23, Peter Khramov:

Once more!)

28.10.2011 22:23, Peter Khramov:

What a meh)) Attempt number 2)

28.10.2011 21:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

No result. :)

28.10.2011 21:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Didn't go off. :)

28.10.2011 20:21, Peter Khramov:

In general, right now, just download uzho easier than)

28.10.2011 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, this item is boiled or not?

28.10.2011 20:19, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, I moved comments to the species there, at the species photo page.

28.10.2011 20:18, Evgeny Komarov:

May I have glitches? It can not spread :(

28.10.2011 20:15, Peter Khramov:

Goes to M. brassicae.

28.10.2011 20:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.10.2011 19:34, Peter Khramov:

Not only in the description or in the gallery too, no? If the latter - then only need to upload again, no more ...

28.10.2011 18:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Now I look at the uploaded photos Ulochlaena hirta. Somehow, it was the only illustrating views. I remember that just laid out, and there is no :(

28.10.2011 11:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, I meant the photo, sorry. In fact, that's rather more complicated, three species, trisignata, latesco, leuconota are "genitalia" ones. Lately some experts began to consider doubtful the very latesco species or its European residency.

28.10.2011 1:28, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, you mean the photo?

27.10.2011 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mamestra brassicae.

27.10.2011 23:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mamestra brassicae.

27.10.2011 23:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

May be Polymixis latesco, these are "genitalia" species, I boiled mine.

27.10.2011 23:17, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

27.10.2011 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Herminia tarsipennalis, catalogued as Zanclognatha tarsipennalis.

27.10.2011 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Herminia tarsipennalis, catalogued as of Zanclognatha genus.

27.10.2011 23:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Herminia tarsipennalis.

27.10.2011 22:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

These look like male and female.

27.10.2011 22:43, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

27.10.2011 21:16, Sergey Novitckiy:

Think, this is Hypsopygia costalis.

27.10.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified".

27.10.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

27.10.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to "identified".

27.10.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to "identified successfully".

26.10.2011 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 21:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 21:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If it's actually Calliteara pudibunda???
Unhappily, I know only "red-tailed" caterpillars, so that's why I wonder.

26.10.2011 19:52, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified".

26.10.2011 19:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

26.10.2011 19:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to sylvestris.

26.10.2011 19:51, Peter Khramov:

Then moved to sylvestris.

26.10.2011 19:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to sylvestris.

26.10.2011 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved to sylvestris.

26.10.2011 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Goes to sylvanus.

26.10.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified".

26.10.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified".

26.10.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified".

26.10.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified".

26.10.2011 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 17:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

26.10.2011 13:42, Peter Khramov:

Done. Now there should be no any logoff bugs. You can use the website as usual.

26.10.2011 1:27, Peter Khramov:

This is being fixed at the moment, when it's done I'll let everybody know right here. Till then please, who is failing whatever, don't comment and add photos (big bugs are possible).

25.10.2011 19:46, Peter Khramov:

Please, those who were suddenly logged off right after logged in with a login name and password and failed going to the next page or adding comments, tell me about by e-mail.

24.10.2011 20:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

sylvestris.

24.10.2011 20:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

sylvestris.

24.10.2011 20:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

sylvestris.

24.10.2011 20:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

sylvestris.

24.10.2011 20:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Alexandr is right.

24.10.2011 15:08, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2011 15:07, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2011 15:07, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2011 15:07, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

24.10.2011 15:04, Sergei Kotov:

No doubt that's Cerura vinula.

23.10.2011 13:42, Peter Khramov:

As for results, the majority voted for the text editing. I'm about to make some option when it'll be edited by default and not if the author doesn't want that, so in that case a user matches a required checkbox and gets happy.

23.10.2011 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes to O. sylvanus.

23.10.2011 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to O. sylvanus.

23.10.2011 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.10.2011 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.10.2011 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.10.2011 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.10.2011 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

23.10.2011 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

23.10.2011 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

23.10.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

23.10.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Diloba caeruleocephala.

23.10.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Diloba caeruleocephala.

22.10.2011 23:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Imho, badly worn-out Ochlodes sylvanus. Look at its right antenna which curved end is so typical for Ochlodes sylvanus.

22.10.2011 18:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.10.2011 18:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.10.2011 18:27, Sergei Kotov:

Thymelicus lineola, Ochsenheimer, 1808.

22.10.2011 18:27, Sergei Kotov:

Thymelicus lineola, Ochsenheimer, 1808.

22.10.2011 18:26, Sergei Kotov:

No, Hesperia comma (Linnaeus, 1758).

22.10.2011 18:25, Sergei Kotov:

Thymelicus lineola, Ochsenheimer, 1808.

22.10.2011 18:25, Sergei Kotov:

Thymelicus lineola, Ochsenheimer, 1808.

22.10.2011 18:24, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.10.2011 18:24, Sergei Kotov:

Thymelicus lineola, Ochsenheimer, 1808.

22.10.2011 18:24, Sergei Kotov:

Thymelicus lineola, Ochsenheimer, 1808.

22.10.2011 18:21, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.10.2011 18:21, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.10.2011 18:20, Sergei Kotov:

Identified wrongly. This is not Т.processionea but Drymonia ruficornis (Hufnagel, 1766).

21.10.2011 18:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ochlodes sylvanus.

21.10.2011 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ochlodes sylvanus.

21.10.2011 18:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ochlodes sylvanus.

21.10.2011 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ochlodes sylvanus.

21.10.2011 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author of the photo identified the species right, that's Diloba caeruleocephala.

21.10.2011 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

The author of the photo identified the species right, that's Diloba caeruleocephala.

21.10.2011 17:14, Peter Khramov:

"What a rain shower!"

20.10.2011 17:13, Peter Khramov:

People who have zabugornye acquaintances in the subject of butterflies, can ask to look at the English version of the site uncomplicated gourmet look? The fact that people go there a lot, and are registered and, in particular, foty ship or write something - quite a few. Terribly interesting to know why this ...

18.10.2011 20:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not carthami, imho. Most probably that's serratulae, can't ensure though.

18.10.2011 20:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not carthami, imho. Most probably that's serratulae, can't ensure though.

18.10.2011 15:42, Peter Khramov:

If the info isn't updated itself after being synchronized, we'll do that manually.

17.10.2011 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

17.10.2011 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

17.10.2011 22:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved out of "undetermined".

17.10.2011 18:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aleimma loeflingiana, the pattern is very reduced but it's on an oak tree :)

17.10.2011 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nomophila noctuella.

17.10.2011 18:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nomophila noctuella.

17.10.2011 17:42, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

17.10.2011 16:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Macroglossum stellatarum.

17.10.2011 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, otpishi on what kind of page and then introduced that literature was not found (if any is available on the website). Then check / fix can ...

17.10.2011 14:13, Peter Khramov:

As for proper species names, if there is still a wrong one after all the data being synchronized, let's do that manually then. Anyway, such comments are better to put at the species description page, not photo.

16.10.2011 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

16.10.2011 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.10.2011 17:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.10.2011 17:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.10.2011 17:20, Peter Khramov:

Done.

16.10.2011 3:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identified right, male.

16.10.2011 1:58, Yuri Semejkin:

Alexandr, thanks! As for dividing, you as amidst professionals know it better.

15.10.2011 17:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

The pupa. Sure, this is a cocoon with a pupa inside. But I don't think cocoons have to be divided in a separate group.

15.10.2011 17:10, Yuri Semejkin:

This is the thing what the caterpillar turned into. I wonder if it should be rather named a cocoon. Pupae still move a little bit while this thing hasn't done since it appeared or I might not have noticed.

14.10.2011 20:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oospila atopochlora, Prout, 1933, not sure.
The species should be taken out of the database and put to "uncertan".

14.10.2011 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably to "uncertain", there: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/apatelodes-firmiana/.

14.10.2011 17:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is to move there: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/calcaritis-pallida/.

14.10.2011 15:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Move it there: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/pero-polygonaria/.

13.10.2011 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

13.10.2011 23:22, Peter Khramov:

In "undetermined".

13.10.2011 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The species is actually there: http://lepidoptera.pro/species/hemiceras-lissanella/.
To move.

13.10.2011 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks! Was this in "undetermined" amidst mine or just the identifying's been corrected (can't remember now)?

13.10.2011 21:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In short pressed a private message.
Literature sent through the field information for the administrator.
Administrator- probably you!

13.10.2011 17:07, Peter Khramov:

Photo leaves "undetermined".

13.10.2011 17:06, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

13.10.2011 17:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. atomaria.

13.10.2011 17:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Vasily, pay your attention.

13.10.2011 16:45, Sergei Kotov:

Ematurga atomaria (Linnaeus, 1758).

13.10.2011 16:40, Sergei Kotov:

Acronicta rumicis (Linnaeus, 1758).

13.10.2011 16:37, Sergei Kotov:

Parectropis similaria (Hufnagel, 1767).

13.10.2011 16:36, Sergei Kotov:

Alcis repandatus (Linnaeus, 1758).

13.10.2011 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

13.10.2011 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Oleria antaxis (identified by the butterfly in the right side of the shot).

13.10.2011 14:16, Peter Khramov:

To go.

13.10.2011 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Photo was added perfectly, these two shots are just not published yet.

13.10.2011 14:15, Peter Khramov:

If the administrator - at me, no I did not get messages ...

13.10.2011 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Your humble servant added a genus for this species few days ago. For that too: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/chrysozephyrus-smaragdinus/. Somehow, photo wasn't applied there.

13.10.2011 8:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stuffed literature insert type - writes that this is not in the catalog of literature. Send All private message to administrator

13.10.2011 8:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

To "uncertain".

13.10.2011 8:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

To "uncertain".

13.10.2011 8:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

To "uncertain".

12.10.2011 21:32, Peter Khramov:

"Gonna add species?", part two

12.10.2011 21:31, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, would you add species?

12.10.2011 21:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.10.2011 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny Komarov found an error that could occur when loading a new literature to the site. She corrected if someone besides Eugene earlier also could not load some literature, but modesty silent about this fact - try again, now everything works

12.10.2011 19:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ought to be moved, species identified right.

12.10.2011 18:25, Peter Khramov:

Why not? Exactly do that, they are very needed, actually.

12.10.2011 13:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

More suggestions???

12.10.2011 13:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Caligo illioneus (Cramer, [1775]).

12.10.2011 13:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Caligo illioneus (Cramer, [1775]).

12.10.2011 13:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Caligo illioneus (Cramer, [1775]).

12.10.2011 13:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Did you get genus? Won't add tropical Lycaenidae photos anymore.

11.10.2011 12:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.10.2011 12:21, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, leaves "undetermined".

11.10.2011 12:21, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Phalera bucephala.

11.10.2011 12:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.10.2011 12:20, Peter Khramov:

To go.

11.10.2011 12:14, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

11.10.2011 12:14, Sergei Kotov:

Parectropis similaria (Hufnagel, 1767).

11.10.2011 12:11, Sergei Kotov:

Malacosoma castrensis (Linnaeus, 1758).

11.10.2011 12:08, Sergei Kotov:

Phalera bucephala (Linnaeus, 1758).

11.10.2011 0:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems, both photos are better to be moved to uncertain pallens.:)

10.10.2011 23:40, Peter Khramov:

To uncertain M. pallens?

10.10.2011 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Sedina buettneri. That's Mythimna and rather pallens. The flight period differs both as the butterfly.

10.10.2011 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.10.2011 23:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not Sedina buettneri. That's Mythimna and rather pallens.

10.10.2011 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's the very Acronicta psi (Linnaeus, 1758).

09.10.2011 22:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'd say this is Oleria sexmaculata = Oleria antaxis (Haensch, 1909).
Oleria assimilis is mentioned only for Ecuador and a part of Peru.

09.10.2011 15:56, Peter Khramov:

To go.

09.10.2011 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to sinica. Again the first species photo, second today. What an amazing day!

09.10.2011 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Same as #10532 shot: Epirrita autumnata.

09.10.2011 15:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Same as

09.10.2011 14:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pryeria sinica.

09.10.2011 14:21, Peter Khramov:

Bah, the first species photo at the website.

09.10.2011 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

09.10.2011 14:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Epascestria pustulalis.

09.10.2011 14:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one too.

09.10.2011 14:07, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, done.

09.10.2011 13:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Taxa added, can be moved.

09.10.2011 12:52, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" then or? Hey, people?

09.10.2011 1:46, Peter Khramov:

Well, store genera ... ... Make a note Make a note, huh? ..

08.10.2011 16:41, Victoria Kiselova:

On the right there is something similar to Oleria Assimilis. Hard to suggest anything more suitable.

07.10.2011 23:42, Marija Jaunkunga:

That's its own choice! It could get away freely but didn't for two days. Sitting here and there, on a car and the staircase. I took it off my cats "crew".

07.10.2011 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Looks extremely pitiful...

07.10.2011 21:47, Peter Khramov:

"They got me, bro!"

06.10.2011 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Synchronization takes a sea of ​​time, so that adds the ability to download new birth now. Who can - please doavit genera for species from the admin area and for the species, which has recently been confirmed in the community. I remind you: it is desirable to use only decent source.

05.10.2011 22:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.10.2011 22:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Epirrita autumnata (Borkhausen, 1794).

05.10.2011 21:31, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

05.10.2011 18:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Species added, can be moved.

05.10.2011 13:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

05.10.2011 11:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hemiceras lissanella, Thiaucourt, 1994.

04.10.2011 10:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.10.2011 8:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.10.2011 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

02.10.2011 19:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is clear, then I continue H. cunea write a little. From this Czech book can take on some of the Old grandmother.

02.10.2011 19:33, Peter Khramov:

ZY Yes, right now there are not published at the bottom of the page bibliography and users who publish information. This infa saved, all the rules, just concluded it will do later.

02.10.2011 19:29, Peter Khramov:

Basil, you load all right, a bundle of stuff is not worth it. BUT. I say to myself Funeta data let down, do not need them through the form of shipping. But if let down, and there is something thread okazetsya not, then it is possible and Funetu again to add ...

02.10.2011 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter here: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/actias-luna/ unaccustomed synonymous with ugly I did. Take, and I do not upload one by one, and the whole bunch.

02.10.2011 18:22, Peter Khramov:

Ok, one born with funeta I added and the view, accordingly, too. Fotu Dmitry, now, apparently, after synchronizing tie ...

02.10.2011 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Two types added: # 10576 and # 10580 (author of the types of errors made in the title).
For the rest it is necessary to add the kind that is now impossible.

01.10.2011 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hm, looks rather similar to Nemophora degeerella, Linnaeus, 1758?
http://lepidoptera.ru/species/nemophora-degeerella/.

01.10.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved to M. confusa.

01.10.2011 20:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is Macdunnoughia confusa, Stephens, 1850.

01.10.2011 16:25, Peter Khramov:

He regained the ability to add new types of performance and admin (ph binding to the species). Forms can now be added only by those who have access to internal thread (so they immediately go into active).In addition, there has decreased the number of fields: Now you need only enter the title, author and year, as well as the source (the latter - on the new system, ie, AutoFit and preliminary addition of a source in the "References" if necessary) and to the Old admin. New species now is to start a ph (see. Admin) and for the exotics.Other additions would be relevant after the database synchronization Lepidoptera.ru, faunaeur.org, funet.fi and blue of the catalog (for the week will try dosinhronizirovat).
ZY Who can, please make kinds of photons, which is now hanging in admnike (4 pcs.)

30.09.2011 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Now the info about the date and shot/caught location of a photo seen on the adjacent page is also available at the English version of the website.

30.09.2011 17:57, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, thanks for the hint, that's been waiting a long time to get moved out of "undetermined".

30.09.2011 17:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. lota.

30.09.2011 17:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined" to B. ino.

30.09.2011 12:00, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

30.09.2011 11:59, Sergei Kotov:

Agrochola lota (Clerck, 1759).

30.09.2011 11:58, Sergei Kotov:

Brenthis ino (Rottemburg, 1775).

30.09.2011 0:04, Peter Khramov:

You further added that if when loading a thread somewhere forgot to put the source or set it correctly, except for an error message the program will fill in all the fields vyshimi data that they do not have to type it again when re-loading. If downloading everything is OK, the field will remain empty. ZYYes, if it's not obvious - for one passage of the Old can be shipped to several fields, though in all (not counting the subspecies: they are loaded separately).

29.09.2011 23:30, Peter Khramov:

About "similar species": simply enter in the "Features of appearance and differences from similar species", with differences from the reporting form (if infa about the differences there) or no difference (if there is no disk imaging). On the basis of information from all the windows in the future to give birth to formal signs, including and lists of similar species.

29.09.2011 23:17, Peter Khramov:

I finish downloading subspecies. Now it is necessary to affix the sources as well as to any other information. Previously downloaded subspecies (without sources) go long as the private messages. Later dovayayu subspecies and editing of information about the kinds of people who brought this infu (ie you can edit it your info, but not someone else's).

29.09.2011 19:47, Peter Khramov:

A species description is themed to subsections signed by users who filled it with texts and references used. All new texts will be added accordable, the old ones are also being changed step by step. For those references that are not checked out yet there will be Lepidoptera.pro noted as a source. At first such way of adding and editing is available only for the admin team (about 10 people), then after working for some time in test mode, for all registered users.

29.09.2011 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Seems bug. Ok, moved to Cerura.

29.09.2011 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Meh, this was the only photo of the species...

29.09.2011 19:41, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

29.09.2011 18:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For sure, move out of machaons (better to Cerura vinula, "uncertain", as yet).

29.09.2011 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hardly Cerura felina (location is doubtful). Most likely Cerura vinula.

29.09.2011 17:54, Victoria Kiselova:

Cerura felina or Cerura vinula.

29.09.2011 16:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identified.

29.09.2011 16:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Andrej, you may be right when trying to identify what Cydia species it is. I didn't check out Pammene. Lots of misfits suit :). Petr, might be moved to Pammene.

29.09.2011 12:40, Peter Khramov:

Goes to males.

29.09.2011 7:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is Male.

29.09.2011 2:14, Andrej Makara:

Alexandr, couldn't it be Pammene fasciana? http://www.lepiforum.de/cgi-bin/lepiwiki.pl?Pammene_Fasciana.

29.09.2011 1:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

29.09.2011 1:08, Peter Khramov:

The new system is the addition of information for species ready. Compared to the test load has changed the scheme of new sources and their performance, it is possible to specify a number of sources of information when adding a form.In addition, now in the case of templateGenus species, for example,Parnassius appollo, the program will automatically place a link to the form (if it is in the database), or wait for it to appear, and then we put. On the pages of the addition of information about the sources and kinds of detail painted instructions.In general, you can begin to fill, if anyone have any questions / suggestions - Wellcome.
Link to the edit page of the form - on the main page of the form, the edit page of sources - see "References."
ZY Paramount: no copy-paste content from websites and books, write on my own, though based on the source, OK?
ZzyHow to fill in: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/nemophora-metallica/
Z.Z.Z.Y. Infu from old descriptions will gradually migrate to the new format.

28.09.2011 18:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cydia succedana, but "uncertain". There are few species of similar color belonged to this genus, one photo is not enough to identify it surely.

28.09.2011 16:13, Peter Khramov:

Yury, we can quite rely on what Alexandr supposed, I haven't moved this shot to a species yet just because this last is not databased as it's named, and a taxon uploader to add new ones and edit old is now being changed. In nearest time everything will be properly moved.

28.09.2011 10:41, Yuri Semejkin:

Could anybody, if possible, approve that?

28.09.2011 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://lepidoptera.pro/species/hyphantria-cunea/
Feeds on cottonwood too. Young caterpillars live socially in the beginning. So that's the puzzle.
http://natlands.typepad.com/nlt_preserve_blog/2009/08/crows-nest-caterpillars.html
A larger photo of this caterpillar needed.

28.09.2011 9:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phyllodesma americana feeds on cottonwood too. That's all I found in social caterpillars. There is also one Pieridae species that doesn't live on cottonwood though. Does anybody have anything besides?

28.09.2011 9:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And why imago??? This is a caterpillar nest.

28.09.2011 9:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Definitely not "identified". Let's check it out by whom such constructions can be made. Especially, on cottonwood.

28.09.2011 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Please, don't.
This is the very cottonwood: http://www.colostate.edu/Dept/CoopExt/4dmg/Trees/cotton.htm. But there are many more species that make nests over there. Rather "uncertain".

28.09.2011 2:58, Peter Khramov:

At the end of the entry there is also the reference number at Lepidoptera.pro [in square brackets].

28.09.2011 2:36, Marija Jaunkunga:

Parectropis similaria, maybe?

28.09.2011 0:35, Peter Khramov:

So what, to identified or?

27.09.2011 22:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is only one Lasiocampidae species as for Colorado, Phyllodesma americana.

27.09.2011 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male, underside.

27.09.2011 17:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

27.09.2011 16:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I had to figure out whether to publish this Fautua general. Right now published, the question asked about the state of the author.

27.09.2011 12:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We need a state in which it is withdrawn

27.09.2011 12:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Probably something from Lasiocampinae

27.09.2011 12:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is possible that there is. But that's where it's shot and the shooting date to know.
Populus fremontii = Cottonwood tree. Apparently the United States.

27.09.2011 11:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It looks like the nest of some caterpillars and who specifically HZ

27.09.2011 11:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It looks like the nest of some caterpillars and who specifically HZ

27.09.2011 3:34, Yuri Semejkin:

As for WB, its color hasn't been changed. In nature, on birthworts it was of the same color.

27.09.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

To Lathronympha strigana or? Identified/uncertain?

26.09.2011 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Leave it as unidentified for now?

26.09.2011 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved from "undetermined" to L. phlaeas.

26.09.2011 23:45, Peter Khramov:

Roman, thanks, shot goes to L. temerata.

26.09.2011 23:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

26.09.2011 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

26.09.2011 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, thanks, moved to "identified successfully".

26.09.2011 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified.

26.09.2011 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. puerpera.

26.09.2011 23:41, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

26.09.2011 22:52, Roman Ishin:

Catocala puerpera (Giorna 1791) = orientalis, Staudinger 1877.

26.09.2011 22:50, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

26.09.2011 22:49, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

26.09.2011 22:47, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

26.09.2011 22:46, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

26.09.2011 22:45, Roman Ishin: This species is identified correctly.

26.09.2011 22:35, Roman Ishin:

Lomographa temerata (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775).

26.09.2011 22:22, Roman Ishin:

Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus 1761).

26.09.2011 22:18, Roman Ishin:

Lycaena phlaeas (Linnaeus 1761).

26.09.2011 22:07, Roman Ishin:

It looks very similar to Lachides contracta male (Butler, 1880), or Lachides galba (Lederer, 1855) with tails ragged due to long flight. It's 100% migrant. Pretty interesting find.

26.09.2011 1:55, Peter Khramov:

Now it's organized in a way when you see first book references and then links (before there was a mashup of all), also the very entry's changed so as it looks like "Authors", "Year", "Reference name" (regular font); "Source" (faint font).

26.09.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

The people out there have downloaded this Fautua: http://lepidoptera.pro/i12.jpg. It is generally, as is relevant to the Lepidoptera? Description: On top of a Cottonwood tree 12+ meters from ground. Size is approx 30 cm long Asking for help in identifying.

25.09.2011 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

25.09.2011 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aleimma loeflingiana.

25.09.2011 12:39, Maxim Schwarz:

Didn't know, fairly.

25.09.2011 12:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rather Lathronympha strigana, Vitaly's got such shot enough. :)

25.09.2011 12:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

The species is identified wrongly, this is not Lobesia artemisiana but Eucosma, maybe, balatonana.

25.09.2011 8:17, Peter Khramov:

As for the species, dunno, won't argue, but the WB can vary as for shooting...

25.09.2011 8:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Everything's doubtful, from color.

25.09.2011 0:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Antoculeora locuples.

25.09.2011 0:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Antoculeora locuples.

24.09.2011 22:29, Peter Khramov:

Hair color doubtful?

24.09.2011 22:13, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, how come it's machaon? Or just wrong uploading?

24.09.2011 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I don't think so: http://blog.naver.com/PostView.nhn?blogId=a6m0ze&logNo=130018277976&categoryNo=35&viewDate=¤tPage=1&listtype=0.

24.09.2011 20:48, Peter Khramov:

There is some information from above that it can be Elcysma westwoodi. Seems to suit, geographically too. Any pro/con?

23.09.2011 22:27, Peter Khramov:

Well, Vasily, it's figured out rather weird. How could one read this "The only one, true S. lubricipeda is there: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id42955/. The rest of caterpillars aren't" like you meant the photo on this page not at biolib.cz?)

23.09.2011 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Meh, I hurriedly comment it yesterday so that seemed vague. Nothing's wrong: the photo I linked as an example is a 100% sure S. lubricipeda caterpillar, that's all.

23.09.2011 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.09.2011 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

23.09.2011 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Bah, there is also this stripe. Or what's wrong?

23.09.2011 18:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Young Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Linnaeus, 1758): http://www.european-lepidopteres.fr/Phragmatobia-fuliginosa.html.

23.09.2011 18:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rather Phragmatobia fuliginosa (Linnaeus, 1758)
http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/arc/phr_ful.htm.

23.09.2011 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I've just got that link. Also, the same in a David Carter book, "Butterflies & Moths" Dorling Kindersley, London 1992 (a photo of a caterpillar what has this clearly seen red stripe).

23.09.2011 0:40, Peter Khramov:

Please, vote everybody who feels the need to.

22.09.2011 23:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.09.2011 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to C. vinula.

22.09.2011 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined.

22.09.2011 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

22.09.2011 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

22.09.2011 19:56, Peter Khramov:

The only one in the whole Internet?)

22.09.2011 18:56, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.09.2011 18:55, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.09.2011 18:54, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.09.2011 18:54, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

22.09.2011 17:37, Peter Khramov:

Hey, admit, who managed to add 3 comments, not logged in and, the main question, how? Wonder so much...

22.09.2011 17:30, :

what happened to this taxon?! it's everywhere but not in Synev Catalogue!
http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=444298
http://www.lepidoptera.pl/show.php?ID=652&country=RU
http://www.dlc.fi/~peterpa/lepi/lajit/scopula.htm
???????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

22.09.2011 17:00, :

what happened to this taxon?! it's everywhere but not in Synev Catalogue!
http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=444298
http://www.lepidoptera.pl/show.php?ID=652&country=RU
http://www.dlc.fi/~peterpa/lepi/lajit/scopula.htm
???????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

22.09.2011 16:09, :

what happened to this taxon?! it's everywhere but not in Synev Catalogue!
http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=444298
http://www.lepidoptera.pl/show.php?ID=652&country=RU
http://www.dlc.fi/~peterpa/lepi/lajit/scopula.htm
???????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

22.09.2011 8:55, Peter Khramov:

As written above, I wait until Friday of comments, and on Friday - start.

22.09.2011 7:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes everything is alright. I told you added a test (just found some from the Old skopipastit on it) and throw it to the dogs Referring necessary. And because it works, and it's time to run.

22.09.2011 6:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spilosoma lutea (Hufnagel, 1766): http://www.kolumbus.fi/silvonen/lnel/a/spilutea.htm.

22.09.2011 6:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The only one, true S. lubricipeda is there: http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/id42955/. The rest of caterpillars aren't. Tomorrow will try to clear it up (out for a day).

22.09.2011 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not S. lubricipeda.

22.09.2011 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not S. lubricipeda.

22.09.2011 6:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not S. lubricipeda.

21.09.2011 23:12, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, the author did note that this is Scopula genus, but in the wrong field. Moved just now, so everybody agrees with the genus then...

21.09.2011 22:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully" (as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10673/).

21.09.2011 22:03, Peter Khramov:

Basil, a couple of comments:
A) I quote: If the source is a website - write only the domain name without www, http, and other debris, and no address-specific pages. Ie do not just copy-paste from the browser Urla, OK?
B) I think that in such cases as yours (for the future) correctly quoting the Red Book itself, not govnosayt.And since everything is OK, yeah.

21.09.2011 19:47, Marija Jaunkunga:

The same on both shots.

21.09.2011 17:25, Roman Ishin:

? Scopula caricaria (Reutti, 1853), at least Scopula for sure!

21.09.2011 17:04, Peter Khramov:

Bah, yes. Moved to Orgyia antiqua.

21.09.2011 16:13, Roman Ishin:

Looks very similar to Orgyia antiqua L. male.

21.09.2011 12:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified. Better to add synonyms at the species description page, not there. Also, there will be a new engine to add a synonym even with sources. Start at this Friday.

21.09.2011 8:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To "uncertain" (photo seems from Yankeeland).
Can't add synonyms:
Actias bolli (Wagner, 1876)
Actias maasseni, Kirby, 1892
Actias rossii, Ross, 1872
Phalaena luna, Linnaeus, 1758.

21.09.2011 8:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

21.09.2011 8:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Normally it works. Added experimental source: http://redbookpk.ru/ (pretty stupid and need to remove it) and adopted it prog ok: everything loaded when you specify this source. Starts.

20.09.2011 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, goes to "identified successfully".

20.09.2011 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I'm told those on the phone, you can try any infu add any sources, not necessarily this form. We're just testing the system as such, then I have all of this data is still Potro.

20.09.2011 22:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To identified: http://www.neotropicalbutterflies.com/Site%20Revision/Pages/Nymphalidae_Pages/Nymphalinae/Nymphalinae_Pages/Siproeta_stelenes.html.

20.09.2011 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

20.09.2011 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes nafig do not need it. Just about the tape it found and tasted here.
And so: in the furnace vikikakiyu (hurt bullshit there are many).

20.09.2011 22:46, Peter Khramov:

About Wikipedia did not understand. By the way, I suggest pedivikiyu same sources do not use. Like as not comme il faut, eh?

20.09.2011 22:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, normally it works: Wikipedia is not listed and it beats (not held with links). Personal data held. Lazy just about moltrehti search for a specific type of pain). You can run.

20.09.2011 18:52, Peter Khramov:

Start a new editing system types go on Friday. Accordingly, until Friday asking potestit and unsubscribe those who have not yet done.

20.09.2011 18:50, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, shot goes to S. libatrix.

20.09.2011 18:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Scoliopteryx libatrix.

20.09.2011 14:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

20.09.2011 14:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

20.09.2011 14:06, Peter Khramov:

To go.

20.09.2011 14:05, Peter Khramov:

Maria, is there http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10674/ different item or? If yes, how far it was shot from this one what's over here?

20.09.2011 14:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.09.2011 13:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

20.09.2011 10:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The very alciphron.

20.09.2011 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

20.09.2011 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

20.09.2011 10:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Could be no other.

20.09.2011 10:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

20.09.2011 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cerura erminea (Esper, 1783), "uncertain".

20.09.2011 8:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rather worn out Cerura erminea (Esper, 1783).

20.09.2011 0:02, Peter Khramov:

As for the similarity - probably, yes. Signs and the truth may be different, so do only in pairs, not more types in the same assembly.

20.09.2011 0:01, Peter Khramov:

As for the download of new species. The idea is that the sources of new species will now be prescribed as well as the sources of the new system of editing data on form. With autosubstitution preliminary and entering into the database.Therefore, I want to first completely ottestit editing of the species, to hear the views of the greatest possible number of people, if necessary, make changes, and then publish the new system load types. As for a few days - at first I protormozil programming editing species, now the people that something is very actively responds.Therefore, there is some delay. Yes, there is still the base of species with faunaeur.org on the way ... Because for the time being so.

19.09.2011 17:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Upload a photo of the form, which is not in the catalog and database, and download new types of closed, Peter, you said that it was only a few days. I understand that now rules the entire system specific load. When Admin earn? :)

19.09.2011 13:58, Alexander Boldyrev:

Hello!
Express your opinion on the similarity:
similarity, or rather, the ability to find differences depend on many factors:
the individual characteristics of perception (color, visual acuity of care -
the ability to isolate the small elements of the overall picture and find the differences in geometry,
microsculpture etc.With the acquisition of experience, becomes: how, in principle, possible to "snatch" out of the picture really meaningful signs
otbrasyvanievtorostepennyh, and do it faster than a less experienced person.
So the similarity - the concept of unstable even at one and the same person,
the more different people.Besides, when it comes to comparing the copies of photos,
also imposed limitations of the images: color, degree of detail,
lighting, camera angle, etc. Also, to some extent it has a value preservation
instance. However, the latter can not be taken into account, as well as aberrations.Repeatedly on different sites to see given for any kind of similar in opinion
authors, surprised that as similar shows this kind and not shown
others, in my opinion, more like.As to the question "if the form A similar to B and B to C, be sure whether this means that A is similar to C or not?", Then I think: if the similarity is evaluated on the same basis, then A will and similar to C. If A is similar to the one in the ground and in the C - on the other, of course, will not be like A S.
Generally, infa about the kinds of similarity - rather slippery subject.It should be limited to a comparison of instances at the same level: at the level of species, genus, subfamily ... but then the comparison will be less informative for an inexperienced person; or to introduce any potentially related ekzemplyary- it would be more useful for beginners, but,
perhaps less interesting for professionals.For example, it is possible to confuse these two instances - Moth Hylaea fasciaria and dustpan Trisateles emortualis. But for someone to be indistinguishable even Moth and lasiocampidae.
Here the picture:
http://sungaya.narod.ru/s/ups.jpg
As I understand it, the site is targeted at a broad audience; therefore it is necessary to give all related species, placing them in a list on the degree of similarity, regardless of the degree of kinship.

19.09.2011 13:30, Peter Khramov:

As for the file format, you may just skip that and it will be automatically determined. Choose that manually only when it's determined wrongly and shots are not added then.

19.09.2011 1:02, Peter Khramov:

I suppose that add infu similar kinds are relatively sane people, not those who do scoops per person. Okay, I'll do, we'll see how it goes. ZY I was there to ask molbiole voprosets similar if form A is similar to B and B to C, be sure whether this means that A is similar to C or not? Can one thread that thread syudy add?

18.09.2011 17:34, Nadin Flegontova:

I think that's my fault, I might have chosen the wrong image file format. Uploading one by one. Seemed to work out finally.

18.09.2011 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

"Similar types of" desired stitch. If you find something like that, you can look for other options. But each person has his own criterion of similarity. :) For some, all the scoops are very similar to other piramidea and Berber completely different :)

18.09.2011 1:27, Peter Khramov:

Is it worth it to enter another line "similar species"? Should I seal the ability to insert special code to quickly link to other kinds of text from any partition?Something likePapilio machaonwill be converted directly into a link to the description of Papilio machaon on the site (if this type has a separate page), or will the text, but without the dogs (if the page is not). What do you think?

18.09.2011 0:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter tried, as he can see. Like all works very well. Flaws can climb when real infu start downloading. Generally titanic work will have to make to complete the information. I think first of all you need to interesting species, for which very little information. Banal think it is necessary to fill in the last turn.But I will be the opposite. Where to take the time :).

17.09.2011 2:51, Peter Khramov:

So, ladies and gentlemen, please potestit new system for editing descriptions of species. As discussed at molbiole - now for each site indicated a source of information and the user who made the Old to the site. How to test:
Go to the page http: // lepidoptera.ru / aspecies / catocala-moltrechti / select the desired section of data in the large window, enter the very Old, in the low - power, and if it is a private message - simply put a label "private message" (assuming that it is Your). In the case of a personal message from all infa field "source" will be ignored.According to sources, the idea is that the sources of this page, you can put only those that are in the website base (page http://lepidoptera.ru/references/). How to check whether or not there? Start typing the name or surname of the author in the edit page of data on a (not all have to copy-paste the name of the author, title and year: so the program will likely not find anything).You will be given appropriate options (such as when searching for the site), are necessary to select the desired (if there is one) or to conclude that the desired source for the time being there (if it is not in avtovyborke).In the latter case, go to the page "Literature" and enter there a new source (three fields - the full name is in the standard list of literature over the years, the numbers of magazines, but no pages, separate the author (s) and year - for reduced citation Online ).If the source is a website - write only the domain name without www, http, and other debris, and no address-specific pages.
For information on the test page, you can enter any (nonsense welcome every kind) - it is there just for a test, and is not visible to other users.As the menu a test - otkommentiruyut pliz in this thread or email me.

17.09.2011 2:43, Peter Khramov:

Alexander said there are now 12 people can live.

15.09.2011 22:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Only for!

15.09.2011 17:36, Peter Khramov:

Ok, marked those.

15.09.2011 16:46, Peter Khramov:

Added shot location from Vitaly.

15.09.2011 14:54, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Petr!
As for Timandra comae, I confirm that both photos were shot at my country house in Moscow region, Ramensky 'hood, nearby Hrypan' village.
Will be back in Moscow in the middle of October.

14.09.2011 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for quickness!

14.09.2011 0:02, Peter Khramov:

Nikita, the service is temporarily suspended cause people didn't get keen on that. First (even if everybody doesn't care the subj and even the discussion) there should be at least few users ready to offer butterflies for exchange and add lists to the database. Now the season's nearly over so there could be some.
As for "nature" shots at Lepidoptera.pro, this is not some concept but a matter of fact, such shots are just more than others, that's all. The website is supposed to become useful and interesting to collectors also (not pushers, don't mix them) as well as entomologists, photographers and just curious people.

13.09.2011 23:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Dysgonia algira.

13.09.2011 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Just don't say that's shot on a sidewalk or at the porch? Envy like hell.

13.09.2011 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified.

13.09.2011 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for reminding. Goes to "identified successfully".

13.09.2011 23:41, Peter Khramov:

To identified.

13.09.2011 23:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.09.2011 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Approve the author's identifying.

13.09.2011 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's right, can't be anything else.

13.09.2011 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

To identified :)

13.09.2011 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Is it so hard to use uppercase?.. Can anybody tell what "sid" means there? The author of it can't...

13.09.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Thanks to all, goes to paphia.

13.09.2011 21:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

paphia female.

13.09.2011 20:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Compared. :) And you look at this butterfly: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/7791/.

13.09.2011 20:37, Anna Novikovaa:

Compare there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silver-washed_Fritillary
http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brenthis.

13.09.2011 20:36, Anna Novikovaa:

Think, this is still Brenthis daphne, cause there is clearly seen dark (!) jagged pattern at the edge of wings.

13.09.2011 20:36, Anna Novikovaa: This species is identified correctly.

13.09.2011 19:38, Nikita Kulanov:

Does this service function at the moment?
Where can I add my list?

13.09.2011 19:25, Peter Khramov:

I propose to launch a service to our garden Alexander Boldyrev (sungaya). Objections have someone there?

13.09.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov:

What concrete can't you cope with? Is there message in the end about the photo was added successfully? Are you uploading zip archive or one by one?

13.09.2011 18:22, Nadin Flegontova:

Can't add a new image, or something is wrong, or I do that so. Seems there are no changes like before.

13.09.2011 17:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

If it's Argynnis paphia female? Hardly passes as Brenthis daphne.

10.09.2011 7:32, Yuri Semejkin:

The food plant on what caterpillars of this species feed (at least, in Botanical garden of the Institute FEB RAS) is Rhamnus ussuriensis.

09.09.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined.

09.09.2011 23:57, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

09.09.2011 23:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Idaea serpentata as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10452/. Approval needed...

09.09.2011 23:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Idaea serpentata as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10452/. Approval needed...

09.09.2011 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

09.09.2011 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.09.2011 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. linariata.

09.09.2011 21:07, Vlad Proklov:

Damophila sp.

09.09.2011 21:07, Vlad Proklov:

Metzneria sp.

09.09.2011 21:07, Vlad Proklov:

Eupithecia linariata.

09.09.2011 21:05, Vlad Proklov:

Scoparia sp.

09.09.2011 21:04, Vlad Proklov:

Isaea serpentata.

09.09.2011 21:04, Vlad Proklov:

Idaea serpentata.

09.09.2011 21:03, Vlad Proklov:

Anticollix sparsata.

09.09.2011 21:02, Vlad Proklov:

Nematopogon swammerdamella.

09.09.2011 13:52, Peter Khramov:

Save Our Spirits.

07.09.2011 1:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

07.09.2011 0:23, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

06.09.2011 19:53, Bronwyn Thomas:

i have found one in wigan england called sid 04/09/11

06.09.2011 19:51, Bronwyn Thomas: This species is identified correctly.

06.09.2011 1:08, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I see identity. We'll have to wait a couple of days until doleplyu system at least for new - as molbiole tried to discuss.

05.09.2011 23:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

And I think, why not lzya add new species? In the admin, and a bunch of new species and errors. :)

05.09.2011 19:59, Peter Khramov:

Citizens went software modification systems redaktiroavniya data on the site. Accordingly, editing data types, as well as the addition of new taxa will not be available for some time. Once the system is active for the translator, and general user-defined functions - load ph, of comments, etc.

05.09.2011 12:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov:

Males again and again...

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov:

Goes to males.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov:

To males.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov:

To males.

05.09.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov:

To males.

05.09.2011 12:15, Peter Khramov:

Went to males.

05.09.2011 12:15, Peter Khramov:

Goes to males.

05.09.2011 12:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

05.09.2011 10:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

05.09.2011 0:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

05.09.2011 0:35, Peter Khramov:

Identified.

05.09.2011 0:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

05.09.2011 0:35, Peter Khramov:

To identified.

05.09.2011 0:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

05.09.2011 0:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

05.09.2011 0:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

05.09.2011 0:25, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

05.09.2011 0:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of a male on #10528.

04.09.2011 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Well, everybody agreed. Moved to A. oxyacanthae, identified.

04.09.2011 20:09, Sergey Talanov:

Sorry for the wrong identifying. I was told at macroclub that's Allophyes oxyacanthae.

04.09.2011 20:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Females are just harder to shoot. They are high flyers, and can be rare met below tree crowns.

04.09.2011 19:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

To identified. There is the same butterfly at macroclub.ru, Allophyes oxyacanthae 100% sure.

04.09.2011 19:25, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Allophyes oxyacanthae, "uncertain", yet. Looks rather like this.

04.09.2011 18:47, Peter Khramov:

There from the top: http://macroclub.ru/gallery/_data/_comfiles/42/IMG_4238.JPG.

04.09.2011 18:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is most probably Allophyes oxyacanthae. Side angle sucks.

04.09.2011 15:07, Peter Khramov:

Surely it? Synev Catalogue says it can be in Volga-Don region what doesn't include Kirov...

04.09.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.09.2011 14:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's it.

04.09.2011 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Bah, that should be one more Deilephila elpenor. Or is there any so similar in Russian Far East?

04.09.2011 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Will be male then.

04.09.2011 14:04, Peter Khramov:

To males.

04.09.2011 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

04.09.2011 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

04.09.2011 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males, identified. So many males in a row...

04.09.2011 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to males.

04.09.2011 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to males.

04.09.2011 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to successfully identified males.

04.09.2011 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Went to males.

04.09.2011 14:01, Peter Khramov:

To males.

04.09.2011 14:01, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified successfully females.

04.09.2011 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

04.09.2011 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

04.09.2011 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

04.09.2011 7:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Should be changed: 1998-07-21 to move to "Date and shot/caught location", and remove 2009-06-14 11:36:00. Also delete second "female".

04.09.2011 7:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2011 7:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that's female.

04.09.2011 7:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Males.

04.09.2011 7:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

04.09.2011 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2011 7:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2011 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

04.09.2011 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.09.2011 7:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

04.09.2011 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

04.09.2011 0:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! Move to griseata, "uncertain". This couple areas don't so cross in these lands, but I will consult an expert later on!

03.09.2011 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to argus.

03.09.2011 22:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nematopogon sp. for sure. Suspect this: http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?id=5796. Hard to say, let's wait for Vlad.

03.09.2011 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caterpillar (not sure though if it can be identified).

03.09.2011 22:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems the same as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10159/.

03.09.2011 21:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.09.2011 18:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's Arctia caja (Linnaeus, 1758).

03.09.2011 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I corrected.

03.09.2011 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.09.2011 14:17, Peter Khramov:

No comments from Vlad yet, so the shot goes to Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata now. Will correct it, if needed.

02.09.2011 18:42, Peter Khramov:

Not so lately the system of shot dates was reconstructed, so now we can see just "1977" year, with no details...

02.09.2011 6:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of a male on #10365.

02.09.2011 1:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, born Garella online odzhen be separate semestva Nolidae (today it has ranked podsemestva), and I like it to be created in the scoop. Correct, be kind. :)

02.09.2011 1:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also there: http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/XanthQuadr.htm.

02.09.2011 1:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Move it there, I asked one man about this very butterfly: http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/xan_qua.htm.

01.09.2011 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Locomotive.

01.09.2011 22:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain". Hopefully, that's it: no such photos at the website.

01.09.2011 22:18, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, goes to M. ferrago.

01.09.2011 22:17, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to L. sticticalis.

01.09.2011 22:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. anella.

01.09.2011 22:16, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

01.09.2011 22:16, Peter Khramov:

To go.

01.09.2011 22:15, Peter Khramov:

I suspect Vlad saw this photo once and not signed it like Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata. Let's wait for him...

01.09.2011 21:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Probably, P. alveus.

01.09.2011 14:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mythimna ferrago.

01.09.2011 14:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

The big one is Loxostege sticticalis.

01.09.2011 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lamoria anella.

01.09.2011 13:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lamoria anella.

01.09.2011 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polia bombycina.

31.08.2011 22:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one, say, can be moved to Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata, "identified successfully".

31.08.2011 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If so, both can be moved there http://lepidoptera.pro/species/xanthorhoe-quadrifasciata/, as I think.

31.08.2011 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified.

31.08.2011 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

31.08.2011 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is not D.porcellus at all, but the very D.elpenor (horny caterpillar). There how it's possible to differ these two species: http://www.schmetterlinge-westerwald.de/untergruppe/familie/unterfamilie/index.php?av=0&ar=0&settings=0&vorschau=1&ansicht=1&gruppeid=1&untergruppeid=1&familieid=6&id=88&portait_gewaehlt=1.

31.08.2011 20:01, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, seems like that.

31.08.2011 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Is not it the same as #10457?

31.08.2011 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Xanthorhoe quadrifasciata (Clerck, 1759)?

31.08.2011 19:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

31.08.2011 19:44, Peter Khramov:

Bzzzzzzz.

31.08.2011 19:43, Peter Khramov:

Dark and scary.

31.08.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Mother, father, me, the horny family.

31.08.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

As well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9994/.

31.08.2011 19:37, Peter Khramov:

The nearby shot is http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10010/.

31.08.2011 19:33, Peter Khramov:

As well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10012/.

31.08.2011 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Beast.

31.08.2011 14:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maksim, Hyles gallii was always in Moscow region, there even can be a second generation (#3003 shot). Sometimes you can meet caterpillars on willow herbs.

31.08.2011 13:42, Maxim Schwarz:

I used to live in Povarovo and never saw such butterflies there. Climate change :-))

31.08.2011 1:10, Eugene Karolinskiy:

OK thanks.

30.08.2011 23:52, Peter Khramov:

Infu the translator. As for the English version - the ratio of attendance of English and Russian about 2: 3 at the moment. Regarding the self-translation - in any case, do not insist, simply inform you that such vozomzhnosti available.

30.08.2011 23:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Successfully = successful. Not quite the same meaning. You can define a successful, but wrong. ;)))

The phrase I would write something like this: "No, I do not think so. As for size, the forewing length is less than 1.5 cm." ("may have not been more than" sounds crazy.)

I, unfortunately, not enough time to write comments and Russian. Aglitski version, IMHO, is not the first necessity. I wonder what the statistics, visit her?

30.08.2011 21:24, Peter Khramov:

About correctly - but this option we discussed with the translator. He seemed a little dryish. But, in principle, it can be changed. About phrases No, it does not seem like such. As for size, forewing length may have not been more than 1.5 cm - then I do not understand the claims. How can you transfer more successful?
ZY I remind you that if someone wants to translate their own comments - reportedly zabatsayu I have the opportunity.

30.08.2011 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, depends on geography.

30.08.2011 17:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

UPD: In fact, the shortcomings mainly on the page "Community" (which I went first of all). Well, for example: "No, does not seem like such. As for size, forewing length may have not been more than 1.5 cm." Some Volapük. :)

The rest are all basically good. :)

30.08.2011 17:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

To release from England instead "This species is identified successfully" it would be necessary to write "This species is identified correctly". Or "The identification is correct".

In general, the translation generally lame. :(

30.08.2011 15:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The underside of #10303 shot.

30.08.2011 1:44, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

30.08.2011 1:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Suppose so.

30.08.2011 0:28, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

30.08.2011 0:27, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

29.08.2011 22:51, Peter Khramov:

It's not the tail who is the main.

29.08.2011 21:41, Peter Khramov:

Generally, giperstrannaya situation. Straight wonders. On the other hand, is now adding new taxa Fidler is not much because of the global association of several new database with the old. There are many species that are not, will be added.

29.08.2011 21:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It turned out for the third time, even though all the other species of the genus entered successfully Hood (the first time)

29.08.2011 21:18, Peter Khramov:

All lines otpishi me what to enter, not just name. And the address of the page on the safe side. And it should be, it is more important still for the post ...

29.08.2011 21:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I can not enter today Chersonesia peraka

29.08.2011 20:54, Peter Khramov:

I normally add. Try again, if nothing again, I otpishi progressive data, then input.

29.08.2011 20:52, Peter Khramov:

To T. griseata, "uncertain" then?

29.08.2011 20:52, Peter Khramov:

Ok, will be male then.

29.08.2011 20:52, Peter Khramov:

To hyale, uncertain, or?

29.08.2011 20:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

29.08.2011 18:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Definitely not Goldia pacifica.

29.08.2011 17:37, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain"?

29.08.2011 14:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems to me that's Angerona prunaria.

29.08.2011 8:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rather Colias hyale.

29.08.2011 6:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male :) This species has a very clear sexual dimorphism.

29.08.2011 4:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Hey, this one really can be T. griseata! Don't move to comae anyway!

29.08.2011 2:27, Peter Khramov:

Sure?

29.08.2011 2:25, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain". Neither the author was sure enough. If shot location needed, I can ask, but that's most probably Ukraine...

29.08.2011 2:24, Peter Khramov:

Ok, if sure, goes to "identified successfully".

29.08.2011 2:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Antigius butleri.

29.08.2011 2:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Can't understand why croceus. Doubtful.

29.08.2011 2:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Why to "uncertain"? ;)

29.08.2011 2:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Why the very taxila? Not sure if it's possible to name the species. If would only experts who saw alive species of this genus suggest something...

28.08.2011 23:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Amnosia decora
Stichophthalma cambodia
Stichophthalma godfreyi

28.08.2011 22:31, Peter Khramov:

An example of the form write that plant.

28.08.2011 22:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nothing climbs. All the best and all-introduce any new species, no error number.

28.08.2011 22:16, Peter Khramov:

If an error is sometimes climbs 502, the floor a temporary glitch. Right now pass.

28.08.2011 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Moved to T. comae (as well as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2045/).

28.08.2011 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Gah. Took all photos away from the species :--(

28.08.2011 22:13, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, corrected this and nearby ones.

28.08.2011 22:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Do not add new types!

28.08.2011 22:13, Peter Khramov:

Opposite to what? Muale?

28.08.2011 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Meh, right. Corrected.

28.08.2011 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caterpillar.

28.08.2011 20:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Yep :)

28.08.2011 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

28.08.2011 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

28.08.2011 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The opposite gender it is.

28.08.2011 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

28.08.2011 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

28.08.2011 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

28.08.2011 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

28.08.2011 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yep.

28.08.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

To go.

28.08.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.08.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.08.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

To go.

28.08.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to laterana, uncertain.

28.08.2011 19:37, Peter Khramov:

Nearby too? http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/2046/.

28.08.2011 19:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris laterana.

28.08.2011 19:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris laterana.

28.08.2011 19:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris laterana.

28.08.2011 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is for sure Acleris, have no Catalogue nearby to check what can be there. Acleris laterana as a version.

28.08.2011 18:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! As far as I know by many shots at different websites, Vitaly didn't shoot in Russian North or Northwest. All shots were made in his village house in Moscow region. Move to comae.

28.08.2011 17:26, Peter Khramov:

Yep, corrected.

28.08.2011 17:26, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

28.08.2011 17:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Important!!!
"The south part of Ozuevsky 'hood, Moscow region" should be corrected everywhere to "The south part of Orekhovo-Zuevsky 'hood, Moscow region".
There is no "Zuevsky" 'hood in Moscow region :)

28.08.2011 17:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right is Orekhovo-Zuevsky 'hood.

28.08.2011 17:05, Anna Lavica:

Good guard early gets up)

28.08.2011 15:09, Peter Khramov:

Most probably Moscow region, but I asked Vitaly to check it, just in case.

28.08.2011 14:54, Alexander Boldyrev:

"...Also, Sungaya is Alexandr Boldyrev who is one of Lepidoptera.pro authors. Hope, he will make it clear".
Personally, I can't make it clear cause I'm not a pro either don't know why it's signed as griseata, or the shot location. If we're talking about this species and if it can be in Moscow region, as far as I know from special sources I've got, there can be only comae in Moscow region. So this question should be posed to the very author of this photo.

28.08.2011 13:24, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to A. aescularia.

28.08.2011 12:42, Peter Khramov:

Ok, changed.

28.08.2011 12:12, Andrej Makara:

Sorry, error, this species is of course Alsophilla aescularia

28.08.2011 4:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, hello! I mistakenly noted month 6 instead of 7, correct that, please. Actually, I shot that with my old Olympus with unstable settings needed to fix every day. I hurriedly set once "6" instead of right "7". I will send you now other shots of this butterfly made with another camera.

28.08.2011 0:53, Andrej Makara:

Alsophila aceraria

27.08.2011 21:05, Peter Khramov:

A special on guglomepsam again Kuzia something zapropal ...

27.08.2011 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, fine: the photo's right there, tomorrow I hope to add new stuff (going to catch some to the light).

27.08.2011 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Check it out, now should work good.

27.08.2011 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My photo uploaded today is somehow lost. Is it getting up or upload it once more?

27.08.2011 18:39, Peter Khramov:

There are new photo features, shot angle (wing topside or underside) and item condition (alive butterfly/moth or dried collectioned item) that are supposed to be marked when uploading shots. Old images already published I'll mark myself. Hence, now photos can be sorted by angle and item condition, and as for last, it's possible to prefer the order of listing what might be rather handy for collectors to see first dried butterflies or photographers to do alive ones.

27.08.2011 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

27.08.2011 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

27.08.2011 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Approve: exactly this I was going to suggest. Lately some dumb bots have been really bugging.

27.08.2011 15:28, Peter Khramov:

To keep immoderate flooding and spam activity off Lepidoptera.pro since now only registered and logged in users are allowed to add new subjects and messages (before that was required only for commenting species and photos).

27.08.2011 14:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved to argus. As for retouching, there should be some limits. For instance, paphia shots are definitely too "art" and not real. Such intense colors as you can see on this shot are rather usual and even default for some digital cameras. Even though for this very photo author did it manually. As for "art" sections and the idea in general, let's look at this on the other hand. I think, we lack better organized system of shot features, say, with common such as "underside", "top", "photo of alive (or dry) butterfly/moth", and user's, like "strictly art stuff" or "trip to Magadan", whatever. And these user's features should be available to choose for everybody, so as everyone could complect his own shot set using all these features...

27.08.2011 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined to uncertain.

27.08.2011 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

27.08.2011 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.08.2011 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. phlaeas.

27.08.2011 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Polygonia.

27.08.2011 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved to H. gallii.

27.08.2011 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

27.08.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Agree, but it's not candidate to be identified though.

27.08.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Bah, that's why it's still there.

27.08.2011 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females.

27.08.2011 12:49, Evgeny Komarov:

I'd suggest Plebejus argus what shot author roughly retouched with hue/saturation tool and got as a result red orange instead of yellow, light blue at the main part of a hind wing instead of gray etc. I used to blunder like this at the beginning of my practicing digital photography. By the way, that would be good to note that for authors uploading their shots not to use such hard "beauty" retouching what intensely changes object's colors. There are other websites for such stuff. Vasily told about it commenting Laothoe sp. shot in black and white. If needed, there can be "art" section at the website image gallery to add there these confusing though beauty things hard to identify.

27.08.2011 11:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uncertainly: Pleuroptya ruralis, Scopoli, 1763.

27.08.2011 10:04, Evgeny Komarov:

There is the next quotation: "Not so lately there was published Kaila and Albrecht work [Kaila, Albrecht, 1994] revisioned this group. Authors showed that Т. griseata can be only in limited areas such as the south part of the Scandinavian Peninsula, Baltic States and Northwest Russia (Leningrad region, Karelia). All info about Т. griseata met in other European regions included Russia, also West Siberia (Novosibirsk region) and Turkmenistan should be considered as T. comai, Schmidt, 1931, what was described from Spain as Т. griseata version". Quoted: Vasylenko S. V. Timandra griseata, Petersen, 1902 (Lepidoptera, Geometridae) found in Siberia. Euroasian Entomological Journal (7(2): 180–181.).

27.08.2011 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

27.08.2011 9:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Hm, many men, many minds :)

27.08.2011 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah: http://sungaya.narod.ru/rhop/lyc/Nor_wal.htm.

27.08.2011 8:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To be right, in Moscow region there's Timandra comae, A. Schmidt, 1931.
Looking at http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/geo11.htm.
Also, Sungaya is Alexandr Boldyrev who is one of Lepidoptera.pro authors. Hope, he will make it clear.

27.08.2011 5:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

The same "Butterfly's head".

27.08.2011 5:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

To macroclub.ru or the "Lepidoptera body structure" page, then no need to describe species. "Butterfly's head", and everything is clear to everybody. :)

27.08.2011 4:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lysandra bellargus.

27.08.2011 4:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyles galli.

27.08.2011 4:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ochlodes sylvanus.

27.08.2011 4:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polygonia c-album.

27.08.2011 4:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lycaena phlaeas.

27.08.2011 4:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Macroglossum stellatarum.

27.08.2011 2:38, Peter Khramov:

"Botanical" is not slang, either I'm not a boy for many years :--) "Botanical" photography means that such shots can be in a botanical textbook. This doesn't mean anything bad, I just didn't find a right word to say that shorter and properer. If you have one, give me a sign... As for the photographic point of view, please, be free, comment also this, not only species. As for defective works, I don't know if the author wanted to shoot it like this, but it was shot whatsoever, and shot well.

27.08.2011 2:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Also, Petr! Why do you name the website as "botanical" one? This is some youngsters slang? For them we're surely all botanists, but this website is entomological, isn't it?

27.08.2011 1:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! I'm not photo genius at all, but have been practicing macrophotography for a long time. This photo (if it ever can be named "photo") is not discussable from any photographical point of view. Fully approve Dmitry and Vasily opinions! There are photographic view and just defective work when a photographer didn't manage to shoot a thing without all this rubbish in the foreground! So that's the very this defective work!

27.08.2011 1:05, Peter Khramov:

Looking at the author's location, think, that can be Ukraine. As for the author himself, he is not professional entomologist, so he might just have looked through similar pics, that's all. Anyway, that's just a guess.

27.08.2011 0:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Very big "but"! Cnaemidophorus rhododactylus shots shown at this website don't suit this one at all! Again, no shot location info :( What about Uganda or Peru? :) )

27.08.2011 0:20, Peter Khramov:

Ceramica pisi?

27.08.2011 0:20, Peter Khramov:

Ceramica pisi?

26.08.2011 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Author suggests that's Cnaemidophorus rhododactylus, but...

26.08.2011 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Author suggests that's Cnaemidophorus rhododactylus, but...

26.08.2011 22:20, Peter Khramov:

Now using catalog you may sort species not only by their full Latin names (genus & species), but also just by name (species only). Thus, list can begin with Abraxas grossulariata or Eucosma abacana both. If you figure out how to make the website easier to use, you're welcome to comment at the "Community" page or send by-mail your ideas.

26.08.2011 22:20, Evgeny Komarov:

No info about shot location, but seeing at author's it should be Moscow region. I'm not an expert in Geometridae, but Evgeny Tsvetkov (Saint Petersburg) thinks there can be only Timandra comae in Central Russia.

26.08.2011 22:00, Peter Khramov:

Some image gallery feature parameters chosen, e. g. the preview size, could get lost while listing pages. Now that's fixed. P. S. Guys, if you notice website bugs, don't hesitate, just let me know. Then corrections needed will be made way sooner.

26.08.2011 21:31, Peter Khramov:

"Kisa & Osya" version was also good. Especially, along with a traffic jam)

26.08.2011 20:52, Anna Lavica:

Traffic jam.

26.08.2011 17:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.08.2011 15:33, Peter Khramov:

Surely female?

26.08.2011 14:49, Peter Khramov:

People, once again on the comments from the various versions of the site: by default we write comments in their own language, in its bourgeois. Then they are transferred centrally to both sides. Since still gourmet of comments were not, then they are not translated. Who will be transferred.In case, if you are dissatisfied with the quality of the translation of his commentary, and want to translate for themselves - tell me, I'll make the appropriate form.But! It is not necessary to answer the bourgeoisie in a bourgeois, leaving the Russian version without the bread and do not publish comments in English on the English version of the site, and then separately on the Russian version of Russian - it will be two separate commentary, rather than one in two languages.
With regards to the photos of botanical and photographic. People, I understand that there foty that with TZbabochkeristskogo directory is not very interesting. Also, I often say that you can have as a default often used dried straightened instances, not Snyatnaya in nature. I remind you that, as our website and book are not limited amount, then there is nothing stopping to take into account the interests of all and sundry.In particular, one of the expected upgrades - prostanovka each foty properties "ekzmeplyar from the collection" or "nature" and "the top of the wings" or "underside" to select at its discretion - which foty be defaulted for you. Iedevelopment is towards a more consolidated data from the relevant selection of information available, and not limitation in one direction or another.

26.08.2011 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Don't be surprised, there is nearly no urticae at all in Moscow region. Met that only once in my life :)

26.08.2011 14:33, Peter Khramov:

Meh, this one also goes there...

26.08.2011 14:32, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for noticing, moved.

26.08.2011 14:32, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

26.08.2011 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, approve Favonius taxila?

26.08.2011 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. ruslana, males, uncertain yet.

26.08.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females.

26.08.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Gender updated.

26.08.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" or leave it undetermined?

26.08.2011 14:10, Peter Khramov:

Gender updated.

26.08.2011 14:10, Peter Khramov:

Goes to males.

26.08.2011 14:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females.

26.08.2011 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved to C. croceus.

26.08.2011 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter here: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/spilosoma-urticae/
S. urticae only two (me and Eugene). The rest are lubricipeda (mustache and black spotted wings too). It is necessary to sort out. S. urticae in MO rare.

26.08.2011 14:08, Peter Khramov:

Imo, the very "ruined" thing makes it rather interesting.

26.08.2011 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spilosoma lubricipeda.

26.08.2011 13:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spilosoma lubricipeda.

26.08.2011 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Both Spilosoma lubricipeda: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=195035&view=findpost&p=1015256 (urticae, there is its photo).

26.08.2011 13:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

From photographic point of view the shot is also meh :( Such ruined foreground ... is not good at all. :)

26.08.2011 13:12, Peter Khramov:

Even though this website is generally "botanical", there will be always some shots more interesting to photographers than to the "botanical" society. This photo is the very such case. Dmitry, it's not proper to compare it to your pictures, cause they might lack some technical aspects, and this one is good from technical and photographic points of view but lacks some "botanical" aspects. Anyway, you already identified it (there is more clearer shot: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9795/) and even shot location can be added (needed to specify).
Due to this, this shot stays and will do on the website.

26.08.2011 13:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Even Favonius taxila (Bremer, 1861): http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Favonius_taxila.htm. Some subspecies?

26.08.2011 10:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I can understand that some girl from Cruatia sent it. That's good but photo, even compared to mine, is nothing.

26.08.2011 10:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How can one even see something on this shot?? Move it to trash!

26.08.2011 10:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I would throw out this photo!

26.08.2011 10:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

C. croceus.

26.08.2011 10:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

C. croceus.

26.08.2011 10:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Species added: let's identify it already (doesn't suit paphia, no way).

26.08.2011 9:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Evgeny Karolinsky turned out to identify it even in February.

26.08.2011 9:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If male, that's right, not paphia at all.

26.08.2011 9:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male! Look at its androconiae! Seems to me, that's Argynnis ruslana.

26.08.2011 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

26.08.2011 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

26.08.2011 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If that's one (doubtful), then female.

26.08.2011 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

26.08.2011 9:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Imho, this is pupa of some Psychidae. Suggest Canephora hirsuta (Poda, 1761).

26.08.2011 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

26.08.2011 9:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And this one is male :)

26.08.2011 9:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yep, red form.

26.08.2011 9:33, Masha Gill:

This is not caterpillar but pupa. Once I saw such fixed to a concrete foundation but empty. Hard to identify.

26.08.2011 9:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

female.

26.08.2011 9:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Sucks that the comments in the English version does not appear in the Russian version. Somehow it is technically possible to solve?

26.08.2011 9:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So it is spam nafigarili Peter was not (translated a couple of pieces, and a horse-radish not entered).

26.08.2011 9:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Sucks that the comments in the English version does not appear in the Russian version. Somehow it is technically possible to solve?

26.08.2011 9:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think you saw Great ash sphinx - Sphinx chersis (Hübner, 1823), or some other from NA Sphinx

26.08.2011 0:06, Peter Khramov:

:--)

25.08.2011 23:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, don't notify, otherwise there is topsy turvy at once :)

25.08.2011 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Back again.

25.08.2011 23:10, Peter Khramov: This species is identified correctly.

25.08.2011 23:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

25.08.2011 15:08, Jelena Plinta:

Thanks.

25.08.2011 12:16, Masha Gill: This species is identified correctly.

25.08.2011 1:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Rather Favonius sp. Can't name the species.

25.08.2011 1:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Nope.

23.08.2011 18:31, Patrick McCready:

I just found one of these larva in my back yard lawn - must have been dropped by a passing bird. Not listed as being found in Canada or anywhere in North America.

23.08.2011 0:52, Peter Khramov:

To go.

23.08.2011 0:52, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

23.08.2011 0:52, Peter Khramov:

Maybe, also http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/10038/?

23.08.2011 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, if you want to comment in Russian in English both, tell me, I'll give you "the green corridor". If not, let's comment in Russian, ok?)

23.08.2011 0:38, Eugene Karolinskiy:

... or Favonius sp. :)

23.08.2011 0:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Possibly Neozephyrus japonicus.

23.08.2011 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

23.08.2011 0:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

N. eximia.

23.08.2011 0:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Some Noctuidae crushed by life. Lymantria dispar would occupy all three fingers. :)

22.08.2011 23:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Laspeyria flexula.

22.08.2011 23:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Laspeyria flexula.

22.08.2011 21:27, Peter Khramov:

Same story, morning glory.

21.08.2011 13:07, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, thanks!

21.08.2011 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Bah, the true one.

21.08.2011 1:01, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to C. praecana.

21.08.2011 1:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.08.2011 1:01, Peter Khramov:

To go.

21.08.2011 1:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

20.08.2011 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cucullia praecana.

20.08.2011 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cucullia praecana.

20.08.2011 21:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Turns out to be Cucullia praecana, never saw it alive though :)

20.08.2011 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is it. There are such (somewhere at the very end): http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?
SpeciesPages/LycaenPhlaeas.htm.

20.08.2011 19:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

20.08.2011 19:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

20.08.2011 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

20.08.2011 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

20.08.2011 13:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to be its female.

20.08.2011 9:48, Stan Korb: This species is identified correctly.

19.08.2011 18:53, Peter Khramov:

That's it. Moved finally and for ever.

19.08.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Yury, this one left without identifying, did you forget to do that when uploading or? Also this looks very similar to Nordmannia w-album.

19.08.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Background das gut.

19.08.2011 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified.

19.08.2011 15:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved from C. pamphilus to C. glycerion.

19.08.2011 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

19.08.2011 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

19.08.2011 15:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When my male gets dry enough, will add that :)

19.08.2011 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" yet.

19.08.2011 15:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females, "identified successfully".

19.08.2011 15:37, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

19.08.2011 15:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

19.08.2011 15:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved from uncertain to identified.

19.08.2011 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's it: seems, there is no more similar.

19.08.2011 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To identified.

19.08.2011 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is 100% nupta.

19.08.2011 14:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

19.08.2011 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

19.08.2011 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

19.08.2011 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also, that's sure female.

19.08.2011 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suggest to move it to identified: http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/geo/enn_ero.htm. I seemed to get such yesterday too.

18.08.2011 18:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Some Caradrina, clavipalpis as a version.

18.08.2011 18:32, Peter Khramov:

There (temporarily uploaded): http://lepidoptera.pro/imb.jpg. Sharpness is also not awesome though, but still.

18.08.2011 18:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

Needed :)

18.08.2011 17:56, Peter Khramov:

There is one more shot with clearer wings if needed for identifying.

18.08.2011 2:40, Peter Khramov:

Papua finally removed! Even though two seasons changed :--)

18.08.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

So is the idea of ​​a global database update types. The goal - a more appropriate framework with a large number of species. European views will be taken to faunaeur.org (system), for additional. Information - funet.fi and tolweb.org. For non-European species apparently have juzat as base the last two.If anyone still has any outline of what can be popolzovavshis for exotics - reported (perhaps even catalog Sineva plaiting). So, before this update, small changes in the database, I think, will not be relevant.

18.08.2011 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.08.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Goes to E. festiva.

18.08.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved to E. festiva.

18.08.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

18.08.2011 0:06, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

18.08.2011 0:05, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

18.08.2011 0:04, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

18.08.2011 0:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is really Coenonympha glycerion.

18.08.2011 0:02, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

17.08.2011 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Celaena haworthii.

17.08.2011 16:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eucharia festiva.

17.08.2011 16:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eucharia festiva.

17.08.2011 6:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Note: this is male.

16.08.2011 23:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

The same looking Lymantria minomonis female, Matsumura, 1934, with a pink abdomen, doesn't live in Russia. Others are different.

16.08.2011 23:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are many Lymantria species in Russian Far East, and 4 in Primorye region, checking out others now. Vasily, I added a comment before seeing yours.

16.08.2011 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Are you kidding me together with Vlad, huh? Comics, meh...

16.08.2011 22:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It lives even in America, so no doubts there, imho.

16.08.2011 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

The main version is Lymantria dispar. Female anyway.

16.08.2011 22:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lymantria dispar female (Linnaeus, 1758).

16.08.2011 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is female underside (female is on #10024 shot).

16.08.2011 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, I might have pushed, aliena seems to suit also.

16.08.2011 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved once more.

16.08.2011 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.08.2011 21:48, Peter Khramov:

To go.

16.08.2011 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified as well as the photo nearby.

16.08.2011 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Not yet. But will be (put it in the wishlist).

16.08.2011 17:50, Pavel Aleshkevich:

This is the same item as there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9964/. Is it possible to note this somehow when uploading photos?

16.08.2011 14:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'll check my Coenonympha at home, maybe find out something.

16.08.2011 14:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Pyronia tithonus.

16.08.2011 13:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

In these lands there can not be Z. trifolii (by Efetov in Synev Catalogue, it can not be even in Russia at all, seems to be west European species). Most probably that's lonicerae.

16.08.2011 13:37, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

16.08.2011 13:37, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

16.08.2011 13:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. virgaureae, female.

16.08.2011 13:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. virgaureae, female.

16.08.2011 9:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wrong: surely larger one.

15.08.2011 22:43, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, what do you mean "preview"? Vice versa, larger photo, huh?

15.08.2011 22:17, Vlad Proklov:

say, thalassina.

15.08.2011 22:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maybe, suasa though.

15.08.2011 21:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is not suasa.

15.08.2011 21:25, Andrey Sazykin:

OK, keep that in mind.

15.08.2011 21:24, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, waiting from you a photo of electa.)

15.08.2011 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yesterday I was catching both these species. That's nupta.

15.08.2011 21:02, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, are you sure?

15.08.2011 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Catocala nupta.

15.08.2011 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Catocala nupta.

15.08.2011 20:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Catocala nupta.

15.08.2011 20:54, Peter Khramov:

Andrey, before users signed photos manually so it was possible to change the copyright location, but now it's signed automatically and location is the same for all. Say, you can avoid that overgoing with a better cropping...

15.08.2011 20:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.08.2011 20:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Heliothis viriplaca.

15.08.2011 20:38, Andrey Sazykin:

There also copyright should be moved to the lower left or right corner..

15.08.2011 20:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looks very similar to Lacanobia.

15.08.2011 20:36, Andrey Sazykin:

Petr, is it possible to move a little bit copyright to the lower left corner, cause now it overgoes the caterpillar's head...

15.08.2011 19:05, Peter Khramov:

Sure. Hurriedly put it to that. Moved to confusa.

15.08.2011 18:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hey ho, Macdunnoughia confusa.

15.08.2011 16:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to dryas, uncertain. If somebody specifies its differences to Satyrus ferula, change to "identified successfully".

15.08.2011 13:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

dryas.

15.08.2011 13:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

One vote plus to dryas.

14.08.2011 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Although catalogue pages were not so slow as community ones, there anyway were some hitches, now fixed and pages thus got way faster.

14.08.2011 15:52, Peter Khramov:

People, more suggestions? Or move to dryas, uncertain?

13.08.2011 23:36, Pavel Aleshkevich:

Anyway, seems to be Minois dryas.

13.08.2011 23:35, Pavel Aleshkevich:

Anyway, seems to be Minois dryas.

13.08.2011 22:50, Peter Khramov:

The underside of its wings: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9976/.

13.08.2011 22:50, Peter Khramov:

The underside: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9976/.

13.08.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Can it be ever identified by such shot? If not, there are clearer photos of the top of its wings, but no underside...

13.08.2011 22:34, Peter Khramov:

The main thing is for sure the small leg professionally posed by its model...

13.08.2011 21:54, Andrey Sazykin:

Meh, thanks! If I also knew what's on these shots :)

13.08.2011 16:41, Peter Khramov:

That's truly good lenses and a camera instead of digital one. Shots look absolutely different...

13.08.2011 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Meh... Can't be like that.

13.08.2011 0:15, Peter Khramov:

Yep. The more, there are photos nearby identified the very C. croceus (even though it was different item and different island too, neighbor one). As for biotope, dunno, science fiction says that myrmidone prefers rocky hills...

12.08.2011 23:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, in such biotope this is rather croceus.

12.08.2011 23:57, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. thyrsis is an endemic Crete species. :) May be some local pamphilus.

12.08.2011 23:51, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M. jurtina.

12.08.2011 19:20, Peter Khramov:

There is a first go of comments to see at the "Community" page of the English version: http://lepidoptera.pro/community/.

12.08.2011 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Comments common pages got 3—10 times faster, depends on a subsection and a concrete one. Besides, before there could be error page shown instead of a required one with comments. Now it's fixed.

11.08.2011 1:10, Peter Khramov:

Since lately Lepidoptera.ru comments have been being translated to English and published at Lepidoptera.pro right after. Later on the same will be implemented to originally English comments both. The translation is totally manual, so comments already done might get published a little bit late compared to original ones (moreover, the oldest ones will be translated first), but results hope to be good and even best. If you have some suggestions on this or you might be eager to translate yours yourself, please, e-mail or comment right over here.

10.08.2011 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. croceus (looking at http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9911/).

10.08.2011 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. croceus (looking at http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9911/).

10.08.2011 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Goes to C. croceus.

10.08.2011 23:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved this and photos nearby to "identified successfully".

10.08.2011 23:13, Anatoliy Krupitskiy:

С. crocea.

10.08.2011 23:12, Anatoliy Krupitskiy:

Hipparchia statilinus, that's right.

10.08.2011 20:47, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, can be.

10.08.2011 20:46, Peter Khramov:

Thanks. Not sure if I should leave it there, but whatever...

10.08.2011 20:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Axylia putris.

10.08.2011 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Isn't that http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/8921/?

10.08.2011 17:44, Peter Khramov:

Feel like I know this one but can't verify it right now.

10.08.2011 14:08, Peter Khramov:

No, doesn't seem like such. As for size, forewing length about 1.5 cm or less.

10.08.2011 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

This angle is surely bad :( Deep cave residential can mean Mormo maura. But looking at this photo, I can guess this one is not so big.

10.08.2011 2:19, Peter Khramov:

More suggestions?..

10.08.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for approving, moved to "identified successfully".

10.08.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Right, I've just screwed it up...

09.08.2011 23:45, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

09.08.2011 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

These ones are all Melitaea didyma.

09.08.2011 22:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

That is Melitaea didyma.

09.08.2011 22:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems to be Melitaea didyma, but can just be similar to. I'll check it out.

09.08.2011 22:08, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moving to identified.

09.08.2011 22:07, Peter Khramov:

Danke, goes to P. stolida.

09.08.2011 21:55, Peter Khramov:

Looks like Coenonympha thyrsis, but what about the fact it can be only in Crete?..

09.08.2011 21:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Think, that one is Coenonympha thyrsis.

09.08.2011 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems like Coenonympha thyrsis. Would be better to have more different images of this species from this very place.

09.08.2011 21:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Prodotis stolida one.

09.08.2011 21:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

That one is Prodotis stolida.

09.08.2011 21:19, Peter Khramov:

The wings are a bit clearlier seen than at http://insecta.pro/gallery/9906/. Mainly, it's hard to identify this one judging by these angles, but I'm very curious since it was shot inside a deep cave. Can be something exotic...

09.08.2011 21:13, Peter Khramov:

Hey guys, what is this Coenonympha (if it's Coenonympha whatsoever)? There are some images more: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9893/ (click to see large ones).

09.08.2011 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Colias myrmidone, isn't it?

09.08.2011 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Colias myrmidone, isn't it?

09.08.2011 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Colias myrmidone, yes?

09.08.2011 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Seems to be Colias myrmidone?

09.08.2011 19:15, Peter Khramov:

Now while uploading a whole archive, in case there is the same shot/caught location or date for all photos included, you may note this information once in the file uploader form, so it will be applied to all those shots.

08.08.2011 20:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to the new species.

08.08.2011 17:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Gotcha. Balsa leodura (Staudinger, 1887).

07.08.2011 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. edusa.

07.08.2011 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. edusa.

07.08.2011 14:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As far as I know, the same, same and the same (for instance, now it's already flight period).

07.08.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there is no question about expansion. What about flight periods, habits, food plants, are they the same or not?

07.08.2011 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

P. daplidice should be in Europe not in Russia. As for differences, I think it's just about genitalia. But there we can judge only by shot location.

06.08.2011 22:28, Peter Khramov:

Where can I find up-to-date description and comparing of these two species? Cause now there seems to be some mess at the website about the information of P. daplidice as well as considering this as Pontia edusa but not P. daplidice...

06.08.2011 22:26, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes from P. regalis to H. costalis.

06.08.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Deal, let's consider question solved.

06.08.2011 22:24, Peter Khramov:

As for Turkey and its "residents": http://lepidoptera.pro/catalog/?tax[]=6963&oc=or&om=or&oz=or&ocou=or&country[]=1012&size=s&perpage=50&order=lat, that means every beast can be there. Goes to Pieris brassicae, without gender.

06.08.2011 22:22, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, there is even note that the butterfly began moving when the author shot that. That's the reason.

06.08.2011 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. rumicis.

06.08.2011 22:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. rumicis.

06.08.2011 19:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta rumicis, Linnaeus, 1758.

06.08.2011 19:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta rumicis, Linnaeus, 1758.

06.08.2011 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Why it's so transparent, huh?

06.08.2011 16:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hard to guess its gender indeed. Suggest male, cause there might be seen at least partly dark spot through the hole in its forewing, if female.

06.08.2011 15:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily, be brave, there can be only Pieris brassicae. :) Male or female? Can't say with this angle. :(

06.08.2011 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe, Pieris brassicae (male)? It lives in Egypt, and should be in Turkey then, I think.

06.08.2011 13:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Very common regalis. They can look rather different depending on color intensity.

06.08.2011 13:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not Pyralis regalis but Hypsopygia costalis.

06.08.2011 12:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Synev and www.faunaeur.org in Russia determine this one like Pontia edusa. I'll add this to the catalog.

06.08.2011 12:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

According to Synev and www.faunaeur.org, in Russia it's Pontia edusa. There are some different opinions about that, but we decided to reference these sources.

06.08.2011 12:15, Peter Khramov:

What about P. daplidice?

06.08.2011 12:15, Peter Khramov:

Hm, maybe P. daplidice?

06.08.2011 11:08, Andrey Sazykin:

You're right, thanks for noticing. Worth noticing also this species is very rare in my hood.

06.08.2011 2:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one is not Anthocharis cardamines but Pontia edusa (Fabricius, 1777).

06.08.2011 2:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mistake, this is Pontia edusa (Fabricius, 1777).

06.08.2011 1:01, Andrey Sazykin:

Not fully agree, but promise to check it out.

05.08.2011 22:27, Peter Khramov:

As for RAW, actually we can't see non re-digitalized primary RAW shot due to it's converted anyhow. Anyway, no drama, just worth noticing this difference between the shot and other ones of this species.

05.08.2011 21:53, Andrey Sazykin:

Can't be color glitches due to shooting RAW. I'll check my settings and shoot, well, pine needles.

05.08.2011 21:38, Peter Khramov:

Don't know, maybe color balance turned to the yellow, so that can be reason...

05.08.2011 20:31, Andrey Sazykin:

? Agonopterix curvipunctosa (Haworth, 1811) ?

05.08.2011 20:21, Andrey Sazykin:

May be Agonopterix?

05.08.2011 19:38, Andrey Sazykin:

What do you mean, the head?

05.08.2011 18:59, Peter Khramov:

Guys, how come this one is undetermined still? Is it something tough or unusual?

05.08.2011 18:53, Peter Khramov:

Hm, too much yellow, isn't? Even considering probable color glitches. Or that's normal, nothing special?

04.08.2011 22:46, Igor Sakhno:

Wonder, what's Catocala fraxini's abdomen colored? Never saw that.

04.08.2011 17:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looks rather like Arenostola phragmitidis, but symmetrical dark spots in the center of the wing make it questionable. Can be defects though, so size is interesting also.

04.08.2011 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Goes to M. alternata.

04.08.2011 17:33, Peter Khramov:

Gah, lazy photographers go ahead. Changed...

04.08.2011 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

"Imago" should be changed to "caterpillar". #9834 shot too. :)

04.08.2011 14:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Macaria alternata (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775).

04.08.2011 13:20, Peter Khramov:

Yes. Moved.

04.08.2011 12:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If I'm not wrong, Timandra comae, Schmidt, 1931?

04.08.2011 12:35, Peter Khramov:

While the card is gradually completed with putting points emerged little idea: instead zabatsat whether in the catalog and in the gallery of a random sample? Example: all foty brow with his favorite region or individual samples from different regions where he had time to visit?This sample will be available to the public and, therefore, users can select the butterflies, for example, the Sverdlovsk region, or even how - as the author of more convenient? In addition, perhaps we could zabatsat and hidden sample that will be available only to the author, or an arbitrary list of users?Moreover, a sign could be not only geographically but in general any.
What do you think?

04.08.2011 12:27, Peter Khramov:

Guys, what's this species? Seems rather common, but I lost my thought...

04.08.2011 12:26, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to S. ligustri (the same item as there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9835/).

04.08.2011 12:26, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to S. ligustri.

04.08.2011 0:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sphinx ligustri.

03.08.2011 23:47, Peter Khramov:

While admin was on vacation, he shot such too )

03.08.2011 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined to A. odorata.

03.08.2011 23:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined to A. odorata.

03.08.2011 23:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

03.08.2011 23:37, Peter Khramov:

On hold again.

03.08.2011 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, will add that in a to-do list...

02.08.2011 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexandr, chill out, please. What about you, what's your own opinion? I saw first a common griseola (what is enough everywhere). As for sure identifying, we can't take out genitalia of this photo, even with all our strength :)

01.08.2011 21:19, Maxim Schwarz:

Drunk, maybe))). Even with its "tongue" out. They usually flush away just of flicks. I finally shot such one, but admin is on vacation now. Not published yet.

01.08.2011 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eilema griseolum (Hübner, [1803]) (nominative subspecies, only one on the continent)? Eilema vetustum (Walker, 1854)?, Eilema coreanum (Leech, [1889] 1888)?, Eilema digna Ignatyev et Witt, 2007? Repeat my question: to what of these three?

31.07.2011 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nothing special: just shot from its underside, laying down on the back.

31.07.2011 22:55, Maxim Schwarz:

What's with it? :)))

31.07.2011 21:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Except collection shots, this automatic thing would suit there very well.

31.07.2011 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rather subspecies: http://fen.nsu.ru/~vvdubat/Lithosiinae/Eilema_griseolum.htm. Since it's impossible to identify for sure, then to nominative.

31.07.2011 20:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Actually, as I see this, most of photos added to the website have exif. And many websites automatically take it out of a shot while uploading. How hard is it to use the same here?

31.07.2011 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

To what species of three?

31.07.2011 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is clear, that's why I asked. Think, to "uncertain".

31.07.2011 19:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

In Primorye region these three species of griseolum group are hardly identified by appearance. But surely by genitalia: http://fen.nsu.ru/~vvdubat/Lithosiinae/Lithosiinaelist.html.

31.07.2011 18:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ascalapha odorata female (Linnaeus, 1758)
http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_noctuidae_2.htm.

31.07.2011 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My suggestion is Z. trifolii, uncertain.

31.07.2011 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

My suggestion is Z. trifolii, uncertain.

31.07.2011 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) ?

31.07.2011 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hm, looks rather dark for that. But ok, let it be promissa. I just caught lots of sponsa this year, so. Maybe, see it in others then. Sorry.

31.07.2011 10:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

First identifying was right, this is Catocala promissa.

30.07.2011 23:50, Maxim Schwarz:

This is Leptidea sinapis.

30.07.2011 15:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Imho, Catocala sponsa, Linnaeus, 1767.

29.07.2011 19:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pieris napi male (Linnaeus, 1758).

29.07.2011 12:12, Basil Sergienko:

This one is Lycophotia porphyrea, corrected its name in identifying.

27.07.2011 23:19, Peter Khramov:

No web. So if there is no any response to messages, or photos are not published in time, that's ok, for mentioned time. Everything will be answered and published as soon as I'll be back. Don't be shy and slow down, upload your whatever, that will be for sure just a little bit late.

27.07.2011 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yeah, she and blueness as ceramics leaves.

27.07.2011 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bad, it's in default settings of my ordinary digital camera for all shots. That's important.

27.07.2011 17:35, Peter Khramov:

So what, Melanchra pisi data is transferred to the ceramic, and M. pisi delete?

27.07.2011 17:32, Peter Khramov:

Exif, say bluntly, not always kept...

27.07.2011 17:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Truly good idea. But as I notice sometimes people often happen to skip even shot location (date could be figured out by EXIF).
People, don't forget about that when possible: that's of a really huge importance (especially, when an insect is not identified)!

27.07.2011 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Understood: Ceramica is.
Genus Ceramica GUENÉE, 1852
pisi (LINNAEUS, 1758)
"Systematic List of the Noctuoidea of ​​Europe
(Notodontidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae, Lymantriidae, Erebidae,
Micronoctuidae, and Noctuidae)
Michael FIBIGER and Hermann H. HACKER "

27.07.2011 16:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, you have to deal with this: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/melanchra-pisi/
and this: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/ceramica-pisi/
It's all different forms of caterpillars of one grandmother.
Only here it is necessary to find out who: Melanchra or Ceramica?

26.07.2011 23:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=133596&view=findpost&p=1227770 (yesterday). And another five raspravki waiting.

26.07.2011 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes oak-and not at all! Here's the paradox than ...... On the willows, poplars. And where exactly on whitewashing "pest" sit. Total for 2 days 6 ind .: Series !!! Sponsy !!!! Tomorrow I will put. NUFT not take a long time (too dofigischa).
In the center of town all this dirty work .......

26.07.2011 22:20, Peter Khramov:

But where he found something? At home in the city? There's what, a lot of oak trees?

26.07.2011 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guys, I'm glad indescribable! Yesterday wrote about 1 copy. Catocala Sponsa.
Today it took five more !!!!! Hooray......

26.07.2011 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved to D. gilippus.

26.07.2011 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to D. gilippus.

26.07.2011 12:57, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks for remarks. Moved to D. plexippus.

26.07.2011 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

26.07.2011 8:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Danaus gilippus.

26.07.2011 8:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Danaus gilippus.

26.07.2011 8:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

26.07.2011 8:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Danaus plexippus.

25.07.2011 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Well, with the arrival!

25.07.2011 20:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good evening everyone. Please excuse for absenteeism. It's time I cut into a business: get a job, a butterfly caught ......... Do not know what to write: guilty!
In short here I am :)
P.S. Today campaign Catocala sponsa purely accidentally took first (posted on the forum to clarify). Glad!!!!!

25.07.2011 12:49, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to identified.

25.07.2011 12:49, Peter Khramov:

Shot went to "identified successfully".

25.07.2011 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to identified.

25.07.2011 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to "identified successfully".

25.07.2011 10:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

25.07.2011 9:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

25.07.2011 9:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

25.07.2011 9:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Went to identified.

24.07.2011 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

24.07.2011 23:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

24.07.2011 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

24.07.2011 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Went to "identified successfully".

24.07.2011 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

24.07.2011 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Went to "identified successfully".

24.07.2011 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

24.07.2011 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

24.07.2011 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Went to "identified successfully".

24.07.2011 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified.

24.07.2011 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

24.07.2011 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 22:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 4:18, Peter Khramov:

Do you feel the aroma of the dignity of film grain? Neither do I. Here it is however.

24.07.2011 4:15, Peter Khramov:

Damn, ponazhimat would nevertheless. For stories. And then the reason not to be seen in exactly certain why it took. About Florida - maybe Florida. Simply there is a strange situation that half of filming location indicated, half not. System not found. Let's see what the author says. If the say.

24.07.2011 2:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved this and photos nearby to "identified successfully".

24.07.2011 2:10, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. monuste.

24.07.2011 2:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

24.07.2011 2:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved to identified along with a photo nearby.

24.07.2011 2:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Based on the selection of species - photo taken somewhere in southern Florida (unlikely in the garden of butterflies, but rather simply in your own garden. :) I myself was there, honey-beer drinking, all that flies out there in the presence of minimal environmental conditions.

PS: I'm tired to press the button "specified right" :) - it seems to be "American" compilation of all true except where I corrected. :)

24.07.2011 2:06, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 2:01, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ascia monuste.

24.07.2011 2:01, Eugene Karolinskiy:

D. gilippus.

24.07.2011 2:01, Eugene Karolinskiy:

D. gilippus.

24.07.2011 2:00, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 2:00, Eugene Karolinskiy:

D. plexippus.

24.07.2011 2:00, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2011 0:11, Peter Khramov:

What's the trouble?

23.07.2011 23:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Looked at the nearby one too ... Petr, if such gags even can be there?

23.07.2011 23:32, Evgeny Komarov:

So what, there is even butterfly?

23.07.2011 22:03, Peter Khramov:

If you want to identify it, look at the photo nearby, that's better seen...

23.07.2011 21:43, Igor Sakhno:

This is something like quiz or?

22.07.2011 12:28, Peter Khramov:

Eugene had strongly photographers would foty its spread, and the site they were not really needed - then we could put conditions.The situation is rather the reverse, especially for species that are not illustrated on the site (for example, the people in general foty to the site is not loaded, and the site was not interested, I found him and asked permission to swing at it and publish foty). So yes, it would be good to place said, but no place better than nothing.By the way, most of the photons without a place he clearly made in the next garden of butterflies, ie there is no place to say. ZY I check with him the issue is ...

22.07.2011 7:43, Evgeny Komarov:

And the author is quite a lot of pictures without specifying the location of recording! Again is back to talk about the obligation of the field in the computation of images!

22.07.2011 0:04, Peter Khramov:

The people there are quite a few new images from the inaccurate determination of the Americas arrived. Take a look pliz with updates ...

21.07.2011 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I corrected.

20.07.2011 23:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Fix My next gaffe - made a kind of scoop Eublemma pudorina (Staudinger, 1889) (Staudinger, 1889), here are the commercials! :(

20.07.2011 13:27, Peter Khramov:

Ok, species added, photo moved.

20.07.2011 5:56, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Yes, seems like that!

20.07.2011 0:34, Peter Khramov:

There could be some incorrect showing up of bigger previews in the Catalogue during the past fortnight. Now it's fixed and works good.

19.07.2011 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Added new species and moved there undetermined photo.

19.07.2011 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved to uncertain too.

19.07.2011 16:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved to monacha, uncertain.

19.07.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Sure, author saw not only abdomen :--)

19.07.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined to uncertain.

19.07.2011 11:55, Valera Bagrov: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 9:15, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 9:14, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 9:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 9:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 9:13, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Rather X.deflorata (Erschoff, 1877).

19.07.2011 9:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 8:56, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Looks very similar to Xerodes albonotaria but without white mark in the dark spot.

19.07.2011 7:35, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Some Arctiidae, probably, Arctia caja.

19.07.2011 7:13, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Looking at its abdomen can say for sure only that's Catocala :-)

19.07.2011 7:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 7:10, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Comibaena amoenaria (Oberthür, 1880).

19.07.2011 6:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 6:56, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Can be Lymantria monacha.

19.07.2011 6:54, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Lymantriidae caterpillar, maybe Lymantria monacha, seems to have fallen to the ground cause it feeds on woods.

19.07.2011 6:50, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.07.2011 2:22, Peter Khramov:

On the fauna is similar. I think we can safely tolerate, since we adhere to these systems. Only synonymous not forget to push while Yigogu. This name should not be forgotten!

19.07.2011 1:51, Igor Sakhno:

Probably, the next-to-last brood.

18.07.2011 20:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues In the family. Noctuidae we have a kind of Yigoga NYE, 1975, which Systematic List of the Noctuoidea of ​​Europe just Xining subgenus Dichagyris LEDERER, 1857 in the genus Dichagyris. It is necessary to clean up and move Yigoga species from his kin Dichagyris. Do you agree?

16.07.2011 16:10, Peter Khramov:

Guys, once more: if you notice any bug or whatever wrong with a website, please, help with letting me know by e-mail or at the "Community" page. Cause unhappily, I can't catch and fix them all in due time, and till I catch 'em it won't be killed.

14.07.2011 23:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Thymelicus sylvestris.

14.07.2011 23:55, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

14.07.2011 23:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Th. sylvestris.

14.07.2011 23:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Th. sylvestris.

14.07.2011 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Long time ago I saw you there, Evgeny )

14.07.2011 21:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Cratocephalus palaemon (Pallas, 1771), as I can see.

14.07.2011 0:23, Peter Khramov:

To go.

14.07.2011 0:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.07.2011 23:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

ja-ja, hyperantus :)

13.07.2011 23:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's it.

13.07.2011 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Aphantopus hyperantus?

13.07.2011 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Aphantopus hyperantus?

13.07.2011 18:43, Igor Sakhno:

Madame.

13.07.2011 13:05, Peter Khramov:

Come on, how come. Urticae as urticae...

13.07.2011 12:58, Andrey Sazykin:

Looked at my old photo, this seems to be Vanessa xanthomelas...

12.07.2011 21:04, Peter Khramov:

Also this http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/5684/?

12.07.2011 21:03, Peter Khramov:

Terrier.

12.07.2011 21:02, Andrey Ponomarev:

Note needed: this is Acanthopsyche atra identified by Fabian Fritzer, lepiforum.de.

12.07.2011 16:21, Peter Khramov:

Well, as it was discussed before, there is some draught of what mapping functions we could have:

Primarily, the very mapping itself available for registered Lepidoptera.prousers, with use of Google Maps
Connecting location to species
Connecting location to user's shot
Date/time
Accuracy of identifying
Comments (freestyle)


Question to all those interested in: is there anything needed besides? Generally also all comments are welcome. Of course, now folks are mostly captured with fieldwork, anyway, please, add your opinion to that.

11.07.2011 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Since now all online users will get "online" status marks what's seen at the "Authors" page. So, you may always get to know if someone you need is online at the moment. Later users will be marked like this everywhere, in comments, photos, etc, not only on the "Authors" page as now.
P.S. The "online" status mark is kept for no more than 5 minutes since last user's activity who logged in with his login name and password.

11.07.2011 23:25, Peter Khramov:

In the last few days there could happen some troubles with search auto expands. Till it's announced further, please, don't rely on that and trying to find something finish properly your search pressing the "Search" button. The image uploader auto expands work good though.

11.07.2011 19:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined to H. gallii.

11.07.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined to C. rhododactyla.

11.07.2011 19:48, Peter Khramov:

Would you give a source? E. g. www.eurofauna.com considers this as a main...

11.07.2011 18:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cnaemidophorus rhododactyla.

11.07.2011 18:49, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Bah, ok, maybe I missed that. Yes, to Proclossiana.

11.07.2011 18:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyles gallii.

11.07.2011 18:24, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, the underside: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9603/.

11.07.2011 17:44, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I removed. And my children's book was a comrade. Mouha, Latin, there is also nothing. Though not like Lampert ...

11.07.2011 17:35, Peter Khramov:

Added as Euphydryas davidi. Moved to Euphydryas sibirica species, E. s. davidi subspecies.

11.07.2011 17:35, Peter Khramov:

Added as Euphydryas davidi. Moved to Euphydryas sibirica species, E. s. davidi subspecies.

11.07.2011 9:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Similarly, a good memory. :). Lampert took looked so called gypsy cedar, elsewhere it has a specific name and the name of sibiricus Siberian moth. Now view sibiricus, demoted in rank and is considered a subspecies of Dendrolimus superans. so remove Messrs modernizing / admins Dendrolimus segregastes. :)
Lampetr very good book, favorite childhood, but there ..... :) Latin

11.07.2011 8:40, Peter Khramov:

There is a suspicion that he took from Lampert. But my book is now on hand there, I can not check. ZY Messrs modernizing / Admin, go to the admin part of the one time is, there kinds Adjust ...

10.07.2011 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

And where this type come from? HETE in it, which is not visible,

10.07.2011 21:29, Peter Khramov:

Not while uploading... Move Boloria eunomia to Proclossiana eunomia?

10.07.2011 21:27, Peter Khramov:

Was undetermined when uploading though now I can see the filename.

10.07.2011 21:26, Peter Khramov:

The people and the kind of Dendrolimus segregastes - et fruit of someone's wild imagination or type Lampert did not?

10.07.2011 12:38, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Dendrolimus superans sibiricus.

10.07.2011 12:37, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Proclossiana eunomia (by the way, was identified already).

08.07.2011 17:45, Peter Khramov:

Today, occasionally the website could be unstable or even unavailable due to it was being moved one more time. That's finally done, and now it should work ace. Still, if you notice some bugs or whatever, please, comment here or e-mail me. Also, especially to regulars, what about the website speed, is it higher than two days ago, lower or, no any big difference as it seems?
P.S. The image uploader is also completely fixed, so you are on the loose to add new shots.

08.07.2011 0:48, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

07.07.2011 21:04, Peter Khramov:

Fixed that uploading bug. Igor, try once more now...

07.07.2011 19:42, Igor Sakhno:

Found out. But can't upload more today.

07.07.2011 19:34, Igor Sakhno:

Try to find.

07.07.2011 14:46, Peter Khramov:

The website is being moved to a new host, and all that.

07.07.2011 14:37, Peter Khramov:

I knew that, I did!

07.07.2011 14:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. tetrio.

07.07.2011 10:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hey, the underside photo? Doubts about Colias phicomone.

07.07.2011 10:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pseudosphinx tetrio. Poisonous for eating or its stings?

07.07.2011 9:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pseudosphinx tetrio.

07.07.2011 8:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

People from Bahamas go ahead?

07.07.2011 8:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Melanargia russiae.

07.07.2011 1:13, Peter Khramov:

Also the author wondered if this caterpillar would be poisonous or not...

07.07.2011 0:59, Peter Khramov:

M. galathea?

05.07.2011 20:24, Svetlana Aminchikova:

This was female, cause after it there was a mass of eggs on the camomile stem and leaf. We put it to a flowerpot where along with hibiscus there were somehow wild strawberries also. Who knows, maybe there can be the next generation? Give me a clue, is it possible? I'm absolutely ignorant and shallow in raising butterflies...

04.07.2011 20:23, Peter Khramov:

In the English version again to register (create a separate account) is not necessary. But to go into your account (with the same password, in Russian) must be separately - for the English version of the essence of a separate site, albeit with the same base. Regarding treatment in English - did not understand that you're talking about?

04.07.2011 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved shot to L. populi. Svetlana, your photo what was put in "saved" is also L. populi.

04.07.2011 19:46, Peter Khramov:

Moderators seem to be taking a nap. Activated species and added photo.

04.07.2011 19:44, Peter Khramov:

Good, first photo of this species on the website.

04.07.2011 19:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved to M. castrensis.

04.07.2011 19:43, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

04.07.2011 19:43, Peter Khramov:

Goes to P. rapae.

04.07.2011 14:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. rapae & P. napi.

03.07.2011 23:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In the English version need to register again ??? It is necessary to make an appeal in English to visit the site.

03.07.2011 20:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Species databased, move now.

03.07.2011 19:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Malacosoma castrensis.

03.07.2011 19:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Malacosoma castrensis.

03.07.2011 19:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nola cicatricalis.

03.07.2011 15:08, Peter Khramov:

To go.

03.07.2011 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Apatura ilia.

02.07.2011 16:55, Peter Khramov:

Meh, yet guys were wrong insisting on deleting in the search "color" feature. Perfect tool to diminish search results.

02.07.2011 16:54, Peter Khramov:

Citizens, as well as in the reference list for the article in the English edition of the Russian-speaking states, it is in Russian, in transliteration or translation? If the transfer - from where it is taken, the author sculpts himself as he wants or something should be some official versions?

02.07.2011 15:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Right.

02.07.2011 15:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

By Synev, 2008 and http://www.faunaeur.org/, yes, Resapamea hedeni.

02.07.2011 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.07.2011 15:39, Peter Khramov:

So now the right name is Resapamea?

02.07.2011 15:38, Peter Khramov:

Deal, moved.

01.07.2011 23:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Heliothis maritima.

01.07.2011 23:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

It belonged previously to Mesapamea genus, but the species is not databased. Should be added.

01.07.2011 23:34, Peter Khramov:

Gah. These doubling comments seem to have to be fixed finally.

01.07.2011 23:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Problepsis, phoebearia, Erschov, 1870.

01.07.2011 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Goes to a new species.

01.07.2011 23:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, this is Myelois circumvoluta.

01.07.2011 23:27, Peter Khramov:

To go.

01.07.2011 23:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.07.2011 23:24, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's it.

01.07.2011 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, yeah... Which one...

01.07.2011 23:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Catocala sponsa.

01.07.2011 23:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Problepsis, phoebearia, Erschov, 1870.

01.07.2011 23:12, Peter Khramov:

Euclidia glyphica?

01.07.2011 23:09, Peter Khramov:

Angerona prunaria?

01.07.2011 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Guys, I feel like there is another name of this species at the website, so no need to add new one to the database. Am I right, or should Resapamea hedeni yet be added?

01.07.2011 22:54, Peter Khramov:

People, suggest something if can, huh?

30.06.2011 22:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Evgeny! These items are being boiled now ;) If it turns out to be something different, I'll correct this. Athalia in Russia usually lives in more dry statias, and britomartis prefers humid meadows. Anyway, devil knows. Will check it up.

30.06.2011 22:24, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

30.06.2011 20:14, Andrey Sazykin:

No way. Even thanks to Evgeny for identifying :)

30.06.2011 19:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Boiled? (Judging by what's seen on this photo I'd stake on athalia, but it's a guesswork anyway...)

30.06.2011 12:46, Peter Khramov:

Andrey, do you mind?

30.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

30.06.2011 1:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not semiargus. Rather amandus.

30.06.2011 1:05, Peter Khramov:

IMHO, it is doubtful that it is necessary. Disk imaging useful in this kind of not, and any subsequent comments obviously go to the theme that earlier definition was incorrect. In addition to a huge pile of photons of this story has not been preserved ...

29.06.2011 22:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, I was thinking that all comments to photos sohranyayutsya, except for initial and copyright. It's like something is wrong, it is not clear to what are sometimes the first to comment, it is necessary to keep the author's definition. There are those who agree with this?

29.06.2011 21:35, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

29.06.2011 21:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

But now it's already sure thing. And still "uncertain" :(

29.06.2011 20:40, Peter Khramov:

Ok, ok. Yet he said "uncertain" ;--)

29.06.2011 20:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hey, what's up!?. Even family is different. This is Zeuzera pyrina.

29.06.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

29.06.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, yeah. Moved.

29.06.2011 18:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, Petr, that's not bug. :) This is Noctua pronuba.
:)

29.06.2011 18:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aphomia sociella.

28.06.2011 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

28.06.2011 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Went to "identified successfully".

28.06.2011 21:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

28.06.2011 21:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

28.06.2011 20:08, Andrey Sazykin:

I'm absolute dum in Geometridae and Noctuidae, and there are hundreds of these...

28.06.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Why not surely?..

26.06.2011 18:24, Peter Khramov:

Although the voting finished a fortnight ago, now finally, there are results. So, most people voted for the interactive map with editing marks and more detailed species descriptions and other taxa. Though less than for the first two things, but there are also votes for image section, better catalog and number of species. Details: image section is permanently getting better, there will be some good changes but no earlier than July (once more, users have been adding photos all the time, in July we should get way more shots and illustrated species). The main new Catalogue option added lately is "AND/OR". Actually, this made search way more useful than before. In the last week I've got species descriptions more detailed such as with a caterpillar life cycle. Totally, in nearest time I'm going to upgrade more that 500 species descriptions, now it's done already about 100. As it's finished, there will be a new Catalogue feature "Caterpillar life cycle" as well as "Imago flight period". As for maps, that's the hardest thing cause personally I have no means to do it myself, and professionals lack, I tried already three of them but no way still. Will try another one to launch that in the beginning of July.

25.06.2011 12:11, Peter Khramov:

To go.

24.06.2011 23:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. tityrus.

23.06.2011 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

23.06.2011 23:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.06.2011 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.06.2011 19:19, Tatyana Gordeeva:

No, that's A.iris, look at this big spur on the hind wing underside.

23.06.2011 19:17, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

23.06.2011 19:16, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

23.06.2011 19:02, Peter Khramov:

C. fraxini? (Evidently, this is the same item as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9460/).

23.06.2011 19:01, Peter Khramov:

C. fraxini? (The same item as there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9460/).

23.06.2011 19:00, Peter Khramov:

C. fraxini?

23.06.2011 18:59, Peter Khramov:

Bug?

22.06.2011 17:55, Peter Khramov:

To go.

22.06.2011 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyles gallii.

22.06.2011 10:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus.

22.06.2011 1:50, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

20.06.2011 16:57, Peter Khramov:

This new option is very handy when you need to get back to default features, so you do that easily pressing the "Reset" button.

19.06.2011 21:02, Peter Khramov:

Yeah. And it is true. Fixed.

19.06.2011 19:16, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

19.06.2011 18:44, Peter Khramov:

So, there are answers: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9416/ and http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9417/.

19.06.2011 18:43, Peter Khramov:

To go.

19.06.2011 18:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.06.2011 18:21, Nina Zagarskikh:

Good, thanks!

19.06.2011 18:16, Nina Zagarskikh:

Thanks!

19.06.2011 18:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes. Arctia caja (Linnaeus, 1758).

19.06.2011 18:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter in the directory typo in the title latynskom podmarennikovogo hawk right Hyles gallii (Rottemburg, 1775), two ll, the author of the brackets if you will fix it and fix it. :)

19.06.2011 18:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyles gallii caterpillar (Rottemburg, 1775).

19.06.2011 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Caja?

19.06.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks, moved.

19.06.2011 13:04, Vlad Proklov:

Ancylis apicella.

19.06.2011 9:54, Nina Zagarskikh:

Added shots of a butterfly and a caterpillar. Please, help to identify. Very curious. Thanks.

18.06.2011 21:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.06.2011 21:20, Peter Khramov:

Fine, goes to euphrosyne too.

18.06.2011 21:20, Peter Khramov:

Goes to euphrosyne.

18.06.2011 21:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved. The first photo of this species on the website.

18.06.2011 21:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved a picture.

18.06.2011 21:18, Peter Khramov:

To go.

18.06.2011 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is definite mistake. This is Ancylis apicella, Vlad couldn't identify it like this.

18.06.2011 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Autographa gamma.

18.06.2011 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Autographa gamma.

18.06.2011 11:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cornutiplusia circumflexa.

17.06.2011 19:11, Yury Sokolkov:

At #9357 shot there is the same butterfly with wings expanded.

17.06.2011 19:10, Yury Sokolkov:

This is the same beast, there with wings expanded, and at #9356 shot with closed.

17.06.2011 14:47, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Macaria notata L.

17.06.2011 14:01, Peter Khramov:

To go.

17.06.2011 9:45, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Electrophaes corylata Th.

17.06.2011 1:21, Eugene Karolinskiy:

If the same, then yes. :)

15.06.2011 11:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.06.2011 11:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to.

14.06.2011 19:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthosia munda.

14.06.2011 18:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Leptidea :)

14.06.2011 17:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

On the evidence of the updated taxonomy we can surely suggest that's Leptidea. There was also added juvernica to sinapis and reali. In Estonia there can be only first or last one.

14.06.2011 17:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.06.2011 17:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Euclidia glyphica.

14.06.2011 17:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus amandus.

14.06.2011 16:59, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, back: -)

14.06.2011 16:53, Peter Khramov:

Sinapis?

14.06.2011 16:53, Peter Khramov:

Sinapis?

14.06.2011 16:53, Peter Khramov:

Sinapis?

14.06.2011 16:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Only the second image disappeared :)

14.06.2011 16:12, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, Thanks for the tip, corrected.

14.06.2011 0:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, the catalog has two Hecatera bicolorata, right from the author in brackets (Hufnagel 1766)

13.06.2011 21:30, Peter Khramov:

A dozen plus in that way...

13.06.2011 20:37, Peter Khramov:

To go.

13.06.2011 20:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.06.2011 20:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. phlaeas.

13.06.2011 20:36, Peter Khramov:

To go.

13.06.2011 18:40, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, if it's the same beast as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9356/, IMHO turns to IMO, or?

13.06.2011 18:38, Peter Khramov:

References are updated with about 40 new ones. Still it's not all, but at least the major part.

13.06.2011 16:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO, euphrosyne.

13.06.2011 16:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Satyrium pruni.

13.06.2011 16:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. phlaeas.

13.06.2011 16:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

euphrosyne.

13.06.2011 16:31, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

13.06.2011 14:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mythimna vitellina.

13.06.2011 14:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mythimna vitellina.

12.06.2011 23:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to X. exsoleta.

12.06.2011 23:17, Peter Khramov:

If I got right, meant exsoleta. To go.

10.06.2011 21:30, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

10.06.2011 21:29, Tatyana Gordeeva:

White spiracles on the whitey-red spotted lateral line mean X.exoleta.

10.06.2011 21:25, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

10.06.2011 21:25, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Approve, the very X.vetusta can have such bright red spiracles alongside the black-white lateral line.

10.06.2011 21:21, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Yet that's X.exoleta. http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=exoleta.

10.06.2011 19:34, Peter Khramov:

Tatyana, to identified or?

10.06.2011 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Dim, yours came, as I wrote to you, and in a letter.

10.06.2011 15:40, Olga Cherepanova:

Tatyana is right, caterpillar is feeding on Iris.

10.06.2011 15:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

So it came or did not come ???

10.06.2011 14:49, Peter Khramov:

Still "uncertain".

10.06.2011 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to Orgyia antiquoides.

09.06.2011 21:03, Tatyana Gordeeva:

This species belongs to Orgyia Och. genus according to the website. But this is definitely not Laelia, cause its hairlocks are simple by structure, and Clostera of Orgyia and Teia genera have ciliae of different hair, compound and with thicker endings (as you can see on this photo). Even though they are rather similar by color, Laelia feeds on different plants as reeds and sedges.

09.06.2011 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Moderators, if approve, add new species...

09.06.2011 15:48, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Teia antiquoides (Hübner, [1822]) too.

09.06.2011 15:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.06.2011 15:41, Peter Khramov:

More suggestions, people?

09.06.2011 15:33, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 15:33, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Looks rather like Teia antiquioides Hb.

09.06.2011 15:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 15:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 15:29, Tatyana Gordeeva:

No, this is Orgyia antiqua L.

09.06.2011 14:31, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 14:08, Peter Khramov:

The people I was there on the request literature lecturing 20:47 10.05.2011. No person of letters there. At the same time, Dmitry, for example, says that sending a letter, but it did not come to me. If someone else sent - Tell me about it, OK? And who is not sent - please allow time for the same case. It must be all the same in the direction of indication of the source forge ...

09.06.2011 13:55, Peter Khramov:

To go.

09.06.2011 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.06.2011 13:42, Tatyana Gordeeva:

The same Xylena. I wonder what does it feed on? Maybe, that's Iris? For this species it's that...

09.06.2011 13:25, Tatyana Gordeeva:

potatoria.

09.06.2011 13:19, Tatyana Gordeeva:

That's it )

09.06.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov:

Meh. Could be a picture for a new species...

09.06.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov:

Goes to identified.

09.06.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved to "uncertain".

09.06.2011 8:58, Tatyana Gordeeva:

I'm sorry, got it wrong to a similar named, surely S.immorata L.

09.06.2011 8:26, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 8:03, Tatyana Gordeeva:

May be X.vetusta Hb.

09.06.2011 7:55, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

09.06.2011 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Goes to amurensis.

09.06.2011 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Just to the genus?

09.06.2011 0:25, Peter Khramov:

Guys, if approve, add/change new species...

09.06.2011 0:25, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

08.06.2011 23:44, Peter Khramov:

Good, moved.

08.06.2011 23:43, Peter Khramov:

To go.

08.06.2011 21:53, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Scopula nemoraria Hb.

08.06.2011 21:51, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Operophthera brumata L.

08.06.2011 21:44, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2011 21:42, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Ceramica pisi L.

08.06.2011 21:36, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2011 21:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2011 21:35, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Xylena Ochs.

08.06.2011 21:30, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Laothoe amurensis Stgr.

08.06.2011 21:27, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Lomaspilis marginata Stgr.

08.06.2011 16:18, Peter Khramov:

Lately one using Lepidoptera.pro catalog could choose whether this feature parameter or that, like "red" color or "yellow". Now it's possible to choose one parameter as well as both altogether, like "red" or "yellow", or "red AND yellow". Thus, search's getting more flexible, and easier for dummies who now might prefer catalog to the image gallery for identifying.

08.06.2011 16:15, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to identified.

08.06.2011 16:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Chazara enervata.

08.06.2011 14:30, Peter Khramov:

Gah, missed that. Just done.

08.06.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

08.06.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks, goes to identified.

08.06.2011 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

08.06.2011 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cethosia biblis.

07.06.2011 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Gah. True pain in the ass with GoogleMaps experts...

07.06.2011 22:51, Peter Khramov:

Guys, is it that or not?

07.06.2011 16:19, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

07.06.2011 16:16, Maxim Schwarz:

I might have fouled up, but I named it as Polygonia c-album. Maybe, this took the previous photo name... shot location is right though. Correct, please :).

07.06.2011 8:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, pointless to argue with Boris! Thus amandus!

07.06.2011 6:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Seems like author's blunder. Adding first Lycaena in a row he put there also Polygonia. Not possible to identify so wrongly.

07.06.2011 0:09, Igor Sakhno:

Seems like female.

06.06.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov:

People, it's named such because of technical bug or what?

06.06.2011 15:59, Peter Khramov:

To go.

06.06.2011 15:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.06.2011 15:58, Peter Khramov:

So now is it right?

06.06.2011 8:24, Boris Stradomsky:

Amandus again!

06.06.2011 8:19, Boris Stradomsky: This species is identified correctly.

06.06.2011 8:19, Boris Stradomsky:

Amandus! Anamnesis: no black spot near the body on the forewings underside and white trace in the submarginal area of the hind wings underside.

06.06.2011 7:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Probably, icarus!

06.06.2011 7:09, Evgeny Komarov:

There seems to be a couple of icarus! The male has a shine different from amandus, and it's full of orange spots!

06.06.2011 7:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Not amandus but P. coelestinus!

06.06.2011 7:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Mistake! This is not amandus but P. coelestinus, what we can clearly see by a very bright light blue dust on its hind wings!

05.06.2011 14:49, Maxim Schwarz:

Awesome! This year I'm also going to catch some night butterflies to UV mercury-vapor or mercury-vapor lamps for make shots.

03.06.2011 1:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

03.06.2011 1:09, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Seems to be N. abdominalis (not sure).

02.06.2011 13:38, Peter Khramov:

To go (approval there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9204/).

02.06.2011 13:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved (approval there: http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9204/).

02.06.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.06.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

To go.

02.06.2011 13:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

02.06.2011 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.06.2011 2:16, Peter Khramov:

Meh. Weel, ok then, there was no such on the website yet. Went to "uncertain".

02.06.2011 1:09, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. tityrus.

02.06.2011 1:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yep.

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ja, ja-ja!

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ja.

02.06.2011 1:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Probably, N. abdominalis.

31.05.2011 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Lepidoptera.ru launched the English version, Lepidoptera.pro. Although there is just a part that's translated from Russian to English, anyway since now foreign speaking folks can get in touch with Lepidoptera. Also, the English version is supported with English names of butterflies/moths, instead of Russian ones. If you somehow notice bugs or have troubles using Lepidoptera.pro, please, e-mail us or comment right over here.

31.05.2011 20:19, Peter Khramov:

Yes, ogovorochka Freud: -) fix.

31.05.2011 20:19, Peter Khramov:

Meant, to males.

31.05.2011 20:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, an error occurred, ♂- is male, I know that you always want the male to the female, but the inscription is necessary to change. :)
Photo # 9190: Synaphe moldavica female

31.05.2011 20:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2011 20:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, this is Nordmannia, wanted to say spini, but changed my mind after shot location. :)

31.05.2011 19:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Hyles euphorbiae, Linnaeus, 1758.

31.05.2011 13:55, Peter Khramov:

To go.

31.05.2011 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2011 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to icarus.

31.05.2011 11:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Polyommatus icarus.

31.05.2011 11:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Hypomecis punctinalis.

31.05.2011 11:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Hypomecis punctinalis.

31.05.2011 10:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2011 10:35, Peter Khramov:

To go.

31.05.2011 10:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

31.05.2011 9:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Euclidia glyphica.

31.05.2011 9:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Euclidia glyphica.

31.05.2011 6:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Siona lineata.

30.05.2011 16:35, Peter Khramov:

Pyrgus malvae?

30.05.2011 16:35, Peter Khramov:

P. malvae?

30.05.2011 16:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.05.2011 16:30, Peter Khramov:

N. quercus or not?

30.05.2011 16:28, Peter Khramov:

E. potatoria?

30.05.2011 16:28, Peter Khramov:

E. potatoria?

30.05.2011 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Truly Polygonia egea?

30.05.2011 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Really Polygonia egea?

30.05.2011 16:25, Peter Khramov:

Really Polygonia egea?

29.05.2011 11:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females.

28.05.2011 1:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.05.2011 0:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. rapae.

26.05.2011 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, understand, thanks!

26.05.2011 18:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Apocheima pilosaria in the catalog, but it is not correct. In Sineva and faunaeur Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermuller 1775), in the admin panel it was correct, but agreed to send the admin of the directory, and then correct the catalog moderators. :)

26.05.2011 18:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Apocheima pilosaria in the catalog, but not correct? To. In Sineva and faunaeur Phigalia pilosaria (Denis & Schiffermuller 1775), in the admin bіlo correctly, but we agreed to send the admin of the directory, and then moderatorі correct directory. :)

26.05.2011 18:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

♂.

25.05.2011 23:09, Peter Khramov:

The people, the view in the admin - a synonym of that catalog?

18.05.2011 15:03, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thank you. Another appeared ...

18.05.2011 7:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Did!

17.05.2011 14:34, Peter Khramov:

People, look in the admin area, if there is adequate titles included in our ...

16.05.2011 21:35, Peter Khramov:

The new unit in the basement of each page allows you to quickly and without pain to place a link to this page in social networks and blogs.

15.05.2011 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thanks, moved.

15.05.2011 12:05, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

15.05.2011 1:35, Peter Khramov:

Moderaaaators...

14.05.2011 23:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Added.

14.05.2011 18:24, Alexander Korolev: This species is identified correctly.

14.05.2011 0:02, Peter Khramov:

People, would someone add/approve new species?..

11.05.2011 21:25, Evgeny Komarov:

72! Won't get worse!

11.05.2011 16:40, Peter Khramov:

By the way, as for comments, is it enough to edit ones added in the past 24 hours, or even 72 hours?

11.05.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen moderators, your move...

11.05.2011 12:27, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, editing of shots and comments is not a question at all :--) I'll do that without voting...

11.05.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! You should have asked also "If you need to edit your own photos and comments?".

11.05.2011 0:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Ahlbergia frivaldszkyi.

10.05.2011 21:29, Peter Khramov:

There was some technical bug in showing results. Fixed.

10.05.2011 20:47, Peter Khramov:

Lord, now admin's page displays a list of references that you used as sources in the establishment of new species. List sorted by polovatelyam. I ask everyone to look their sources and send them to me in a suitable form for publication (ie, title, publisher, etc.And not just the author / year, for example, and without cuts). As we have agreed above - no pages / numbers, but with the title of the article, etc. All this applies to paper sources, with sites all so clear.
Thus, the form of communication - a letter in the mail.Format: Id / serial number on the left of the source name on the admin's page - full name of the citation. It goes several times the same thing can be omitted.
If you have questions / neponyatki - better to first ask what the risk that you will do something wrong, and then will be lazy to redo ...

10.05.2011 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Igor, there is some technical bug. Added info is saved, but will shown correctly on the website later on, I will fix that (no need to double it with comments).

10.05.2011 20:34, Peter Khramov:

Anyone not lazy, please, vote (see the right column at the main page or other common website pages).

10.05.2011 20:13, Igor Sakhno:

July.

10.05.2011 20:12, Igor Sakhno:

Sure, that's July.

10.05.2011 20:09, Igor Sakhno:

I seem to press the wrong button. Will correct that right now.

10.05.2011 11:58, Peter Khramov:

To go.

09.05.2011 13:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ochropleura plecta (Linnaeus, 1761).

07.05.2011 3:31, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. By the way, yes, like a glitch. Tomorrow look more precisely, what it was.

07.05.2011 2:09, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I remarked a few photos on the site, dated November 30th. Various authors. At this time, the appearance of the relevant butterflies in appropriate locations unbelievable. At first sinned in the inaccuracy of the author, but noticed others ... It looks like a bug. Could you check?

06.05.2011 18:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 12:45 06.05.2011
Peter! I understood everything in hzode conversation. Just for those who are not quite in the topic, all the better once again mark!

06.05.2011 18:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander Zhakov, 06-05-2011 15:33
I got it right! That it should be minimally acceptable embodiment. Letter for the year is not necessary, because by publishing the names of difference the number will be different!

06.05.2011 18:17, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Igor, would you please be more attentive to labels? Don't mind tityrus in Berminvody, but the 30th of November!

06.05.2011 15:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with the position of Evgeny Komarov. as I understand. The total list of references as the accepted author, year, title, edition (if the author of this year several works, the year is the letter 2010a, 2010b, etc.), you can easily numbering in alphabetical order, all the basis of the work to be getting on soybean place. pages species numbers in the text and numbered at the bottom of literature.Do not be afraid of a large number of literary. When the lot can be divided into letters. :)

06.05.2011 12:45, Peter Khramov:

There's also several times written transcript page of the form will not only be, but it will be the most complete, in contrast to the overall list of information to the site.

06.05.2011 6:21, Evgeny Komarov:

And in addition. On the page of the form should look like a link number, author, year. Here I agree with Eugene (Karolinska). Ie in the text, which is entered on a infa it may be just a number, but then the numbers are at the bottom of the page should already be decoded in a short version (number and corresponding author of a year).If decryption is not on the page, then on the number of desired hyperlink.

06.05.2011 6:01, Evgeny Komarov:

You need to refer to the author, of course, and its publication. I do not suppose that the reference is simply to the Entomological Review. Ie The work should appear in the list as: author, year of publication, title of publication, and publication, which is published (with regard to literature from magazines / collections). Includingthe list should be "individual articles " - a telephone conversation I meant. If there is only Pupkin, 1990. Entomological Review, the right problem - there Doe, who in the 90 th year of the EA published 3 works! And understand which of them we can not. Ideal (with exact volumes, numbers of pages of guests) is difficult to implement.But at least it should be informative.

06.05.2011 0:25, Peter Khramov:

ZY And the moderators spoke. I wrote above consolidated opinion.

06.05.2011 0:24, Peter Khramov:

With regard to hyperlinks in the text - that links already terribly take the attention, and the sense is not very much - the source list will be on a separate page of the form will not be so great to not find the desired material number. Concerning the standard approach - if we do each article, individual pages, etc.independent source, then after a week of these sources will be thousands of online and search among them in the list is daunting. You may want to make a separate article, but certainly not the individual pages in the same source ...

05.05.2011 23:05, Eugene Karolinskiy:

"Hyperlinks - what reference? " - To the number in the review of the form - a hyperlink to the desired location in the list of references (see details on the source).
"rooms - less than distract from the basic material " - IMHO, it does not distract, but quite the contrary. Source source of discord; It is looking at what the source is taken infa know whether to believe her.:)
"Together, they will go into the general list of references for the entire site, but on the page of a particular type will be indicated and the issue, and pages and so on. " - Yet, what prevents to use the standard method of drawing up the list of literature generally accepted in the scientific use - i.e.Each paper is cited separately?
IMHO, let moderators will vote, I still have nothing to add. :)

05.05.2011 22:56, Peter Khramov:

Sources are numbered as they become available, but numbers will be sequentially for all the sources on the site, and not separately for each species. Actually, now for many kinds of pop a small part of the old sources already available, you can look at the living examples (although the lists are incomplete and will not be complete until everything is discussed).Hyperlinks - what reference? Is that possible in future reviews of the literature, then yes ... As for the Doe vs room - a reason in your words have, in the last version I did. Obsuzhdaemo (non - less distracting from the main material, Doe - more informative).It is important to understand that the number will still need to know, otherwise the source list will not add. With regard to all the articles together - they go together in the list of literature for the entire site, but on a specific page of the form will be indicated and the number of the magazine, and pages and so on. Although the possible options of detail - again, obsuzhdaemo.

05.05.2011 22:09, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

05.05.2011 22:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

With this approach, the list of literature sources will be numbered as they arrive? Hyperlinks will be? Maybe it's better to give in the form of links [Doe, 2011], not just uninformative [159]? (In this case, the sources do not enumerate.) And what is offered smylse "site under the numbers are only the common names of sources - that is,website, book, journal, but not numbers / addresses specific pages or volumes / Issues "- ie all articles in, say, " Entomological Review "will list all together, under one number? IMHO, do not do. I have a source associated primarily with the author was, and it wants to see.

05.05.2011 21:13, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

05.05.2011 21:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Brahmaea tancrei, Fustaut, 1896.

05.05.2011 17:45, Peter Khramov:

The final discussion about specifying the literature data on the site : So, phone calls come to the next option. Suppose you add a new form of information or even a new look. Now, when it is necessary to specify the source of information where you get this.The source added to the general list on the description page of the form.The algorithm is as follows: take the source, go to the page with a general list of sources on the site, look, there he is there or not (if the source of many, we look through the avtopodoborok - similar to the search for species) - if not, we start a new source and see its number if there - looking room.Go to the page with the description of the form and add the number of the source (if there is, again, not yet). At the same time in the list of sources on the site under the numbers are only the common names of sources - that is, website, book, journal, but not numbers / addresses specific pages or volumes / numbers of magazines.But on the description page of the form next to the number of the source is a field where you can enter the page already, and any other additional information (preferably, but not necessarily).Thus we get a list of data sources on the description page of the form, including the page and volume, as well as a general bibliography on the site - without the pages and volumes. In addition, in the case of free descriptions can include links to specific sources of the middle of the text (for example, in the Russian Federation evrochasti it flies from June to July, [13]).In the formal signs will indicate the time volley from March to September (for the other regions, it flies even then).
I ask everyone to voice their opinion - the right approach or not .

05.05.2011 17:10, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO B. daphne.

05.05.2011 15:52, Peter Khramov:

The people in the kinds of editing is not access, it is working, but I am making changes there. It will be ready - unsubscribe here.

05.05.2011 15:33, Peter Khramov:

Eugene wrote to a page fotoy.

05.05.2011 15:32, Peter Khramov:

Photo will be moved to Brahmaea tancrei. People, add new species to the database, please.

05.05.2011 15:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Yevgeny Komarov, 9:36 28.04.2011
Peter! You http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/9037/ photo is true in uncertain, but it is somehow wrong to moths. Until a consensus with a view!

Petr Khramov, 16:52 28.04.2011
Yeah.

So uh huh, uh huh Ioli not? :) So hang in brameya moth! Move to undefined!

05.05.2011 1:02, Peter Khramov:

So now I hung general bibliography, in the near future to make the system to add your sources and give you a list of who has what information where previously brought, to be able to add all the sources of their own ...

05.05.2011 0:58, Peter Khramov:

The site gradually introduced system responsible for the information taken from these or other data on species and other taxa on the site. Who is the general list in the appropriate section, that look - infa about the sources page for each of the active species.

01.05.2011 21:39, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: Narva town, Ida-Viru, Estonia, on the asphalt nearby old school. 2010/07/17, 17:50.

01.05.2011 21:30, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: seaside nearby Mūsa Saku, Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2010/07/09, 18:24.

01.05.2011 21:30, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: seaside nearby Mūsa Saku, Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2010/07/09, 18:24.

01.05.2011 21:28, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: woods near Vikerkaar community garden, Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2009/07/12, 21:27.

01.05.2011 21:27, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: Vikerkaar community garden, Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2009/06/20, 19:18.

01.05.2011 21:20, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: Vikerkaar community garden, Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2010/06/18, 15:55.

01.05.2011 21:18, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: Vikerkaar community garden, Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2009/04/26, 20:40.

01.05.2011 21:17, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: Vikerkaar community garden, Ida-Viru, Estonia, in the house on the floor. 2011/04/22, 17:24.

01.05.2011 21:14, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: woods near Narva-Jõesuu town, Ida-Viru, Estonia, on a jacket in the dark. 2010/10/30, 15:30.

01.05.2011 21:12, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2010/08/11, 07:56.

01.05.2011 21:11, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: deserted field near the seaside, Saku farm, Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2010/08/19, 15:08.

01.05.2011 21:09, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: Vikerkaar community garden, Ida-Viru, Estonia, flying over a bonfire. 2010/08/21, 13:51.

01.05.2011 21:07, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: petrol station Statoil, Narva city, Ida-Viru, Estonia, in the shade of a fuel dispenser.

01.05.2011 21:03, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: road field, Ida-Viru, Estonia. 2010/08/08, 13:45.

01.05.2011 21:01, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: woods near Narva-Jõesuu town, Ida-Viru, Estonia, on the alder bark. 2010/10/17, 15:56.

01.05.2011 21:00, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: Vikerkaar community garden, Peteristi, Ida-Virumaa, Estonia, spring meadow. 2010/08/21, 14:27.

01.05.2011 20:58, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: reeds and sedges near water, Narva Reservoir, Ida-Virumaa, Estonia. 2010/09/21, 14:33.

01.05.2011 20:56, Boris Lariushin:

Date and shot/caught location: meadow, Ida-Virumaa, Estonia. 2010/08/21, 13:53.

01.05.2011 20:55, Boris Lariushin:

Shot date: 2010/08/21, 14:27.
Location:
Vikerkaar community garden, Peteristi, Ida-Virumaa, Estonia, spring meadow.

01.05.2011 18:20, Peter Khramov:

The question was solved then complete the insertion of references to literature, and again everything is editable.

01.05.2011 18:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

01.05.2011 18:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.04.2011 17:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hada plebeja Linnaeus, 1761. Better to give the shot location.

30.04.2011 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Enargia paleacea (Esper, 1788).

29.04.2011 10:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And when the issue will be resolved ??? Waste time

28.04.2011 16:52, Peter Khramov:

Yeah.

28.04.2011 9:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! You http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/9037/ photo is true in uncertain, but it is somehow wrong to moths. Until a consensus with a view!

28.04.2011 9:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Novel! Here we are just discussing how to make life better and invited all to participate. Yes deficiencies, including You can not edit the authors own photos and comments, more than enough. This question, by the way is also discussed and, I believe, will be resolved.Frankly, I do not quite understand your aggressive reaction to a normal discussion of existing problems or questions.

28.04.2011 8:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Igor! Would you add a photo of its underside?

28.04.2011 8:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Fatal no. You are always (if forgotten) can sign up in the comment to the photo anything.
About the collection site / lovli- agree. Place of collecting sounds right.
Where do you see anger and rudeness?
On any network site has its own rules here, and they also have. But it is always ready to discuss the rules, because the site is just starting to live.If you have a desire to become moderatorom- Wellcome! There are no geniuses and wage moderation for no one receives. But enthusiastic people really need.

28.04.2011 8:04, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Russian any service can bring to the absurd :). What fatality that the user does not have a definition and a gathering place / shooting (that "collection " instead of "Fishing " and should be written)? Everything can be improved, but it causes a lot of problems, resentment, and even rudeness.Lord moderators (!) Is you do not give the user the inability to change the content of their photos after the publication of this you take on the "duty ", that it annoys you.Can make a normal personal account and give the user the right, but not "bind " it ... "fields "? or I'll have to something? Chinese govoryat- "I do not know how to smile ... you should not open the shop " ... or go to the moderators :)

28.04.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov:

To be picky enough: according to Synev (exactly, Zolotuhin in Synev Catalogue), in Russian Far East can be only tancrei who has a note "wrong identifying certhia auct.". Roman! Reask after Dmitry: why certhia? Petr! Don't move it anywhere till discussion finished.

27.04.2011 22:05, Peter Khramov:

Sorry, moved to another one. Gentlemen, add Brahmaea certhia then to move it there.

27.04.2011 22:04, Peter Khramov:

Dmitri, an official theme you looking at? There is the issue of sources of (their symbol) decided not to update the system at all text data as the cut off for a week.

27.04.2011 21:17, Oleg Seliverstov:

May be Gynaephora selenitica caterpillar.

27.04.2011 18:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It is impossible to drive a sub-species - I can not go to the page of the form to continue. Plus with Pieris naganum nakosyachil, and I can not fix

27.04.2011 13:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where has it been moved? Species is not identified just by external features. As far as I know, these are twin species.

27.04.2011 13:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr, didn't get it, what for Charissa???!!! This is Brahmaea!!!

27.04.2011 13:10, Evgeny Komarov:

Not 100% sure either. They caught metis there, but I managed just to shoot this very butterfly, not catch. Or shooting, or catching, as a rule :(

27.04.2011 12:59, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to P. philea.

27.04.2011 12:58, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to ziczac.

27.04.2011 12:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.04.2011 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny (Komarov), what do you think about it yourself?

27.04.2011 12:55, Peter Khramov:

Went to icarus.

27.04.2011 12:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to icarus.

27.04.2011 12:54, Peter Khramov:

To go.

27.04.2011 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

27.04.2011 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to argiades.

27.04.2011 12:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Identified successfully.

27.04.2011 6:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

True Notodonta ziczac, that's it.

27.04.2011 6:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why did you name it as Colias phicomone???

27.04.2011 6:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Such riddles (undetermined photos) we do have 409.

27.04.2011 6:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why not tancrei???

27.04.2011 6:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, I would, and he, too, without filling this field did not take photos on your website!

27.04.2011 6:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Keep! Mandatory in all cases.

27.04.2011 5:07, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Brahmaea certhia.

27.04.2011 1:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, looks rather ilia indeed. Not fully sure though.

27.04.2011 1:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I would have done strictly necessary in all cases. What picture author does not know where the shot? :)

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. icarus.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. icarus.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

E. argiades.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

E. argiades.

27.04.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

E. argiades. Surely. :)

27.04.2011 1:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This is certainly levana (provided that it was shot in Europe). :) There are antennas on its head, what io doesn't have.

26.04.2011 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Citizens make someone a new kind of adequate admin pliz display ...

26.04.2011 23:21, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. Perhaps, in the case where the form is not defined, and the truth is essential to make the field ...

26.04.2011 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, don't get rusty. Man just proposed a riddle thinking that colleagues would be happy to solve that. We got a deal that it would be better to do that further, and now it's more important to add to the website as much good info as possible. Roman adds new shots already signed, and old ones he commented with names, so there can be no any critics.
Also, guys, take somehow all these webtalks easier, ok? We can make a quarrel in a second just because of misunderstanding or wrong understanding. Let's remember we've good minds and can clear up something in a calm way, without radical actions...

26.04.2011 18:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Petr Khramov:
Following Roman as for identifying as he evidently knew the species from the very beginning.
Roman Romanov:
Sure! Looks like... male...

So I can consider that like irony about my identifying??? Well, well! If someone is so lazy just to write down the species name and its shot/caught location, ok then, let he keep this info on him. Since today I'll ignore his photos.

26.04.2011 15:26, Igor Sakhno:

No, no label.

26.04.2011 13:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter and colleagues! In my overdue mandatory filling of the field when you add a photo! Well, here is the picture without underside copper-butterfly # 9025 without specifying the place of shooting. Though it would have to guess, but having a place, the choice is reduced. Without him ... Let him something to fill, TB when the "look is not defined "! It is impossible without it (IMHO).

26.04.2011 12:35, Victoria Kiselova:

Not io for sure.

26.04.2011 11:29, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" or just leave it empty?

26.04.2011 11:28, Peter Khramov:

Guys, to "uncertain" or?

26.04.2011 11:28, Peter Khramov:

People, to "uncertain" or?

26.04.2011 11:28, Peter Khramov:

To uncertain?

26.04.2011 11:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.04.2011 11:27, Peter Khramov:

More suggestions?

26.04.2011 11:27, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen moderators, add species at last...

26.04.2011 11:26, Peter Khramov:

Roman, so it's certhia or tancrei?

26.04.2011 11:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.04.2011 11:26, Peter Khramov:

To go.

26.04.2011 11:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.04.2011 11:24, Peter Khramov:

Following Roman as for identifying as he evidently knew the species from the very beginning.

26.04.2011 6:51, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

If you ask Google "Sephisa dichroa princeps"... you can see results :). The female colored differently... that's why it's named like that... I think :)

26.04.2011 6:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Yura Arzanov!

26.04.2011 6:43, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Sephisa princeps.

26.04.2011 6:42, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Bibasis aquilina.

26.04.2011 6:42, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Bibasis aquilina.

26.04.2011 6:40, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Polygonia c-album.

25.04.2011 14:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

25.04.2011 10:42, Boris Stradomsky:

How do you know about "that very time"? Lyosha Bok told you or?

25.04.2011 4:51, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

:) Zhen'... pipe it down. If that's not evident... yes, that's Russian Far East :)

24.04.2011 23:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And how could it only be "dicolora" when even I can see at least three colors, black, white, orange.

24.04.2011 23:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That's what Google says: "No documents found" to Sephisa dicolora request. Can't understand, where from could it only be, Sephisa dicolora princeps Fixs. Why say anything?

24.04.2011 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Hm, always goes like this. Moved.

24.04.2011 22:53, Peter Khramov:

Roman, why it's added to "undetermined" while you know perfectly the species?

24.04.2011 22:52, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, fair to say that nobody obliged Igor to use Synev Catalogue. You're mixing somewhat inner and outer services.

24.04.2011 21:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Such wrong identifyings are caused by author's neglecting shot/caught location info! Million times there was told about this!

24.04.2011 20:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Boris! So sign it like you told, anyway it can be easier just to mention female caught/location :) The rest is interesting but irrelevant indeed. By the way, I was in Dombay that very time!

24.04.2011 20:54, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

24.04.2011 15:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Christophi in the Russian Far East??? This is Brahmaea certhia or tancrei.

24.04.2011 14:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

"Sephisa dicolora princeps Fixs"
What for that??? Where did you dig out this combination??? The default reference is Synev Catalogue! Sephisa princeps, male.

24.04.2011 14:42, Igor Sakhno:

I would say this is io.

24.04.2011 14:30, Igor Sakhno:

The second one (behind) is Apatura schrenckii.

24.04.2011 14:25, Igor Sakhno:

Brahmaea christophi, maybe.

24.04.2011 14:23, Igor Sakhno:

Sephisa dicolora princeps Fixs.

24.04.2011 13:19, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Sorry :( Nearby Vladivostok.

24.04.2011 11:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If shot in Russia, can't be another species.

24.04.2011 10:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Identified wrongly! This is Pieris napi.

24.04.2011 10:35, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Sure! Looks like... male...

24.04.2011 9:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Aglais urticae.

24.04.2011 9:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sephisa princeps.

24.04.2011 9:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pieris dulcinea. Why without shot location?

23.04.2011 20:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not 100% sure. There is one shot looking very similar to: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/imagehtmls/Pieridae/Phoebis_p._philea_f-pupa4_USA_FLORIDA_Alachua_Co._Gainesville_Kanapaha_Pines_III_14-XI-2010_i.htm.

23.04.2011 20:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is there any label??? Looks very similar to Colias heos female.

23.04.2011 19:37, Andrey Ponomarev:

Abraxas sylvata.

23.04.2011 17:03, Peter Khramov:

Went to villica.

23.04.2011 17:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.04.2011 17:02, Peter Khramov:

To go.

23.04.2011 17:01, Peter Khramov:

To go.

23.04.2011 15:50, Igor Sakhno:

Maybe, Zygaena trifolii Esp.

23.04.2011 15:47, Igor Sakhno:

Can be (Odontosia (Notodonta) ziczac L.) (seriously questionable).

23.04.2011 15:40, Igor Sakhno:

Apatura iris L.

23.04.2011 15:39, Igor Sakhno:

Apatura iris L.

23.04.2011 15:38, Igor Sakhno:

Araschnia levana m. prorsa L., summer form.

23.04.2011 15:34, Igor Sakhno:

Epicallia (Arctia) villica L.

23.04.2011 15:22, Igor Sakhno:

Probably, Everes alcetas (?).

23.04.2011 11:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Meh, should be for sure. Talked about it already!

23.04.2011 1:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Correctly understand - I leave tomorrow and Sunday will be in the Volgograd! Mandatory program for this trip was quite napryazhno barely fulfilled :)

22.04.2011 17:24, Peter Khramov:

Still there should be a field for photos what are identified to a genus or family...

22.04.2011 17:03, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, and Sunday is no longer in Moscow will correctly understand? And then, perhaps, would be met somehow. Dmitry, you are asked about the English version - transfers sent to me, but I'm not happy with them nifiga. I think, to bring them to a decent state will only where the thread for the May holidays, then fire up Lepidoptera.pro is English, but without interactivity. In future all comments will be posted on both sites, ie It will be a permanent transfer back and forth.

22.04.2011 16:59, Peter Khramov:

Whoa!

22.04.2011 16:58, Peter Khramov:

Dim, if you are sure, put it to the database then.

22.04.2011 16:57, Peter Khramov:

Hey, aborigines, more suggestions? What to write down?

22.04.2011 16:57, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain" or? Nothing?

22.04.2011 16:56, Peter Khramov:

Updated: Philippines.

22.04.2011 8:49, Boris Stradomsky:

In this very case it's rather hard to give standard label info. In short: Polyommatus eros boisduvalii. Female mother was caught in Volgograd by Gennady Kuznetsov. The egg came in Rostov-on-Don. The caterpillar was raised in Dombay (1600m above sea-level) on astragals picked at Mussa-Achitara (2700m). Pupaed in Dombay, but pupa raised in Rostov-on-Don.

21.04.2011 23:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phoebis philea.

21.04.2011 22:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Or Eulepidotis modestula.

21.04.2011 21:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suggest Phrygionis privignaria.

21.04.2011 21:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Something of Phrygionis genus.

21.04.2011 17:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I'm still in Moscow - most likely Alexander is right and I do not now have access to the sources - on Sunday will do everything!

21.04.2011 6:35, Oleg Seliverstov:

Caterpillar of Lymantriidae genus.

20.04.2011 17:24, Peter Khramov:

I think this is on the part of Eugene more. Eugene, ay, what do you say?

20.04.2011 14:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Looks like Eulepidotis micca (Druce, 1889).

20.04.2011 8:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Shot/caught location: Malaysia, Palawan island. This is endemic Palawan (Philippines) species. "Malaysia" should be removed!

20.04.2011 0:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, born Herculia synonym of the sources that we decided to use it to Hypsopygia

20.04.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.04.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.04.2011 22:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Should be moved.

19.04.2011 22:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, move the species, I've added already to the database.

17.04.2011 9:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

My suggestion is Apatura ilia. Please, pay attention and suggest yours.

16.04.2011 17:13, Peter Khramov:

According to sources such as how it is that we will prescribe the number under each section of the description (fodder plants, names, geography, etc.), and total pages of literature and look to add the full name of these same sources. If anyone have any thoughts / objections about this - Wellcome.

15.04.2011 18:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I wrote about food !!! I thought you were too mean sources of food stretch. Without adequate botany I have no faith. The base source for Lepidoptera (original description) I type when writing the type / kind.
Try to lure Papaver forum. He rummages in plants. Not vyydet- I'll try. I hope he will not say

15.04.2011 13:44, Peter Khramov:

Not about that. Dmitry wrote, I realized that nerd is needed to verify the sources of the system plant, rather than the host plants. And for fodder, as well as for other indications, such as a nerd is not required at all sales ...

15.04.2011 5:54, Evgeny Komarov:

I have something I brake :) You yourself wrote (Petr Khramov, 19:12 13.04.2011) about the power plant? But, of course, the base source for everything sculpt!

15.04.2011 4:31, Vladimir Mescheryakov: This species is identified correctly.

15.04.2011 1:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, undetermined.

15.04.2011 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, undetermined.

14.04.2011 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.04.2011 23:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Aphantopus.

14.04.2011 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved/activated.

14.04.2011 23:52, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain"?

14.04.2011 23:51, Peter Khramov:

Dim sources - not for the plants, and for butterflies.

14.04.2011 22:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Latin name is right, but it's not about this butterfly at all. There are 4 other species of this genus in Krasnodar region. Generally, this is mostly genitalia family, and with this angle...

14.04.2011 20:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Napaea eucharila.

14.04.2011 18:36, Evgeny Komarov:

So over the winter unload all decent - now filmed two weeks after fresh (at least for us here) - are not the fruit of the 40-50 day peacock photos, etc.
I agree with Dmitry - it is not necessary to rebuild the system as is a relatively new product.You can slowly and evolutionary stages, and me having when it is ripe and it was true. After this process is here and now. And take for a new dogma - will not work anyway.
About sources agree with the proposal of Peter (do base sources and provide links in the description, and this applies not only to food plants).

14.04.2011 15:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm for the old system. For all can not keep up.
Sources ??? Who will check ??? Botanist need.
Photo yesterday I downloaded. Today it is still going to fold

14.04.2011 15:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Some of Riodinidae.

14.04.2011 15:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Alucita hexadactyla.

14.04.2011 15:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Aphantopus hyperantus.

14.04.2011 15:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Podalia orsilocha.

14.04.2011 14:41, Peter Khramov:

Dime, you must first pile system to feed the plants were not just a free list, as it is now, and sampling - that is, fixed values. Only after that can be integrated with the Plantarium.But before you make a selection, you need to understand the system (whether to keep the old or not) and sources (sculpt, as I suggested in the previous post or not). And people often lose something bezmolstvuet. And for once there is no longer new ph almost daily. Looks like spring stagnation begins ...

14.04.2011 14:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How are things going with botanists ??? There will be links to forage plants ??? The question is relevant for me.

13.04.2011 19:12, Peter Khramov:

At a meeting with Anatoly it puts forward the idea that we should have all the same sources of information in the descriptions of something to put down. Ie We write in food plants than just birch, oak and birch, [1] Oak [2,3] with prior entering into the general list of sources (to assign rooms). In the case, if we take just out of my head, writing as a private message.Confidence in the information on the site that should be added. Who thinks about this? Ps. Until then, until you come to a common opinion, the ability to edit descriptions and other information about the kinds of I disconnect.

13.04.2011 19:09, Peter Khramov:

To go.

13.04.2011 19:09, Peter Khramov:

To go.

13.04.2011 16:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lied. Turns out to be.

13.04.2011 16:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Can'be in Assam.

13.04.2011 16:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Something of Phoebis genus, I think.

13.04.2011 16:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Elcysma westwoodi, Vollenhoven, 1863.

13.04.2011 16:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Elcysma westwoodi, Vollenhoven, 1863.

13.04.2011 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

13.04.2011 6:08, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

This is idas without a doubt!

13.04.2011 3:21, Peter Khramov:

Meh. That's some leftovers of a past identifying. Will remove.

12.04.2011 23:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

What's not exact there... (mechanical voice) There everything is exact! ;)

12.04.2011 23:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Probably. Not 100% sure. Let's wait for Zygaena experts' opinions. :)

12.04.2011 23:48, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not argus. Most probably P. idas. There is idas checked by genitalia nearby this shot location.

12.04.2011 23:46, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2011 23:45, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

12.04.2011 16:59, Igor Sakhno:

I have no doubts about the label since I caught this butterfly myself, in 1976, when I was 14 and spent all the summer in Berezov Mineral Waters resort, Kharkov district. Anyway, opinions are welcome.

12.04.2011 15:48, Peter Khramov:

The first results of the acceleration: the first time in three months in the queue remained unpublished truck - with the exception of those for whom I have a question to the authors.

12.04.2011 5:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Seems to be just Zygaena lonicerae!?

12.04.2011 5:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Sorry!

12.04.2011 2:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.04.2011 2:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.04.2011 2:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.04.2011 2:50, Peter Khramov:

To go.

12.04.2011 1:36, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Don't know for sure.

12.04.2011 1:33, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO C. flocciferus.

12.04.2011 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. flocciferus.

12.04.2011 1:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus (male).

12.04.2011 1:22, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. palaemon.

11.04.2011 22:24, Peter Khramov:

Nooo. If that was question "what's this?", there should have been something between "this" and" the number of the shot (not just space), say, dash.

11.04.2011 22:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Why instead? I asked what it was on #8379 shot! Meh...

11.04.2011 21:52, Peter Khramov:

Hm, thought it over for serious before realized that you meant "this species" instead of "this shot". Meh...

11.04.2011 20:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Evgeny! What about this, #8379?

11.04.2011 20:35, Evgeny Komarov:

My label says this.

11.04.2011 16:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is this surely Assam??? Hm, this species can be only in southern states and Sri Lanka.

11.04.2011 15:27, Peter Khramov:

Now, if the species on the site has more than one illustration, all of them can be displayed on a single page large preview photos - corresponding link is available in the upper right side of the page with a photo and description of the page with the form. At the same time you go into the gallery section and have all the features of the selection of images, and removing the checkbox "Only photos Nazvanie_vida" can view photos of all types, not just selected.

11.04.2011 12:12, Peter Khramov:

To go.

11.04.2011 12:11, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

11.04.2011 11:26, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr, hello! Seems, this butterfly is already identified at mine. #6391 shot, Archiearis notha.

10.04.2011 23:34, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Z. filipendulae.

10.04.2011 22:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Whatever! Let it be 0.75 then. But many wonder for sure the species shot location, or its expansion. Or one just doesn't want collectors to find that out? Can't see other reasons to hide this information, cause you even have some fields to fill in with this info when uploading photos.
As for location map, that's cool! But, as for me personally, when I find some interesting butterfly in web, I wonder first its shot/caught location. Not speaking of the fact, that in trouble cases this info helps to specify/correct the very identifying. Example: Hypparchia shots made in Crimea. Without shot location it could pass as Hipparchia semele, but that was H. pellucida. I'm talking now not about doubts in Boris identifying, but some special attitude to such information, especially if it's expert.

10.04.2011 18:13, Peter Khramov:

I may lack of the statistic of website users and their needs, but certainly 0.75 is more true. Anyway, you have a point that it's always better to have as much info as possible. Nevertheless, without location map it's not so handy yet...

10.04.2011 18:07, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

I think that would be good to have such system. Moreover, species are offered for exchange very gently with a simple hyperlink that absolutely is not calling. I'm sure, step by step everything will work.

10.04.2011 17:56, :

There are photos of butterflies shot "in nature". This website is ecological, so collectors just don't "glue" to it with their exchange deals. By the way, those who don't do that will be troubled with such service. Better to exchange at molbiol.ru or even make another website for that.

10.04.2011 17:25, Peter Khramov:

This is my blunder, I published not noticing that it was already applied to a species, even signed. Will move it right now.

10.04.2011 17:07, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Why the name of the species disappeared? I signed it as Plebejidea cyane.

10.04.2011 17:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! I meant a collection item, in this case its value will be null for sure! There it 0.25, ok, some people just need to have a look at a species. But only 0.25 :)

10.04.2011 16:01, Peter Khramov:

By the way, now for those who affix daw work with field becomes quite a topical - with automatic scaling and affix copyright online sharpening is not made, keep in mind. So if you need a thread ansharp - do before downloading. If the checkbox is not put - that of your choice ...

10.04.2011 15:58, Peter Khramov:

As for null value, you overdid for sure ;--) In this website it can never have a null value, and it will be more reasonable to mention shot/caught location when it will be possible at last to mark location at a map (I'll working out it right now).

10.04.2011 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Messrs, another question arose in the system: Alexander Zhakov naryl the web a new version of the database, which offhand be fresher but poaktualnee than that used nonche site (or more precisely, not the entire site, and the part that remained from the old checklist).But there are a couple of Trouble - A) is not always clear that for the regions correspond to the codes in the database, and b) Basis of almost anonymous, although a list of links to sources. In general, please look and express their opinions, whether to use this site. Link to discussion of the regions and the actual base: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=457368

10.04.2011 9:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Boris! Why do you publish photos with no info about shot/caught location? The same as item without label in collection. Species seems to be rare, but with no label it has a null value.

09.04.2011 23:14, Peter Khramov:

So ready. Now resize and implementation of copyright occurs at the site, so the publication of photos daw "not edited" will be an order of magnitude faster than before, and the photos without the jackdaws - though not an order, but also operative.In addition, changing the approach to the publication of new pictures - now often foty will be published no heaps of several tens / hundreds intermittently in a day or two or three-week, and most (though sometimes smaller groups).Therefore, the publication of new photos voiced in the news will no longer be, instead, in the right box on the main pages of the site appeared the section "New Gallery", which displays the last 5 photos - by changing the composition of this section, you can always tell, it is loaded with something new since your last visit or not.

09.04.2011 15:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looks like Euchrysops genus or Chilades.

09.04.2011 15:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, something of Euchrysops genus or Chilades, but how can it be found in Ukraine? :)

09.04.2011 13:53, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_AWRYnwy_Ts4/TAAIFAOGRbI/AAAAAAAAAG8/MOzEBrNEfJA/s1600/small+cupid.jpg.

09.04.2011 13:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Didn't get it myself :(

09.04.2011 13:44, Peter Khramov:

In the course of the day on the site is finished loading the new system with automatic copyrights, so most of the time this section will be inactive. Once everything is ready (approximately, in the late afternoon / Nocera Moscow time) - I'll post relevant news.

09.04.2011 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Not so hard:
http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_megalopygidae.htm#Edebessa bicolor.

09.04.2011 9:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Sasha, where did you find it? I broke my mind with this beast. Was clear to the family, but further, no way!

08.04.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved too. Sorry, that not at the time.

08.04.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.04.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Gah, that can work if there will be feedback on what's right or wrong and what's should be fixed or changed...

08.04.2011 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Better to move :)

08.04.2011 22:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why not move?

08.04.2011 21:24, Evgeny Komarov:

It will work, don't jump the gun!

08.04.2011 20:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems like locals are rather special guys, more photographers and naturalists than collectors who are evidently minors. They do exchange and sell deals somewhere else, in other places or by means of private messages. Anyway, the subj hopes to be useful, it just needs time to get progress. Don't lose courage :)

08.04.2011 12:57, Peter Khramov:

People, could anybody elaborate why there is nearly no reaction to the subj? Doesn't anybody need that or what?

08.04.2011 11:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.04.2011 11:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.04.2011 23:00, Igor Sakhno:

Maybe, that's right. Can be moved whatsoever.

06.04.2011 15:20, Peter Khramov:

It seems like zaprogrammil same automatic copyright, pick up another final clearance, after which Communism finally has come, and foty marked daw "not edited" will be published soon (all preparations will be made automatically on the website), not marked - not so fast but clearly faster,than it is now.

06.04.2011 0:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is semele there. Crimea is the northest land for pellucida, it's expanded more to the south and east.

05.04.2011 23:02, Igor Sakhno:

What about Bulgaria and Romania that have the same latitudes as Crimea?

05.04.2011 19:17, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I met it even at the end of September, in Crimea (rather worn-out), but November, imho, unbelievable.

05.04.2011 18:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

fagi is pure summer species, the label is definitely mistaken.

05.04.2011 17:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved/activated.

05.04.2011 17:32, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, right, but in this case it should be identified but named differently (at the personal page). Whatever.

05.04.2011 16:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is some mistake in Latin name, and the system can't see names that are not databased :)

05.04.2011 15:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Hipparchia pellucida! To move! There is no semele in Crimea and can not be, since this is more northern species.

05.04.2011 15:46, Evgeny Komarov:

H. pellucida expansion: the mountain part of the southern coast of the Crimea... H. semele: Baltic states, Belarus, Western Ukraine. To the north till the Leningrad region, to the east till Smolensk, Bryansk, Kaluga and Ivanovo regions (reference: A. L. L'vovsky, D. V. Morgun. Lepidoptera of Western Europe). Petr! Move to H. pellucida!

05.04.2011 15:31, Peter Khramov:

Weird that was named in comments and not moved to "identified"... Moved.

05.04.2011 15:31, Peter Khramov:

That's pretty weird that already named in comments was not moved to "identified"...

05.04.2011 11:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Pterophorus pentadactyla, Linnaeus, 1758.

05.04.2011 11:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Pterophorus pentadactyla, Linnaeus, 1758.

05.04.2011 10:59, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen moderators, approve, please...

05.04.2011 1:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Igor, would you please say something about this butterfly? Where and who caught it, to what collection and so on.

05.04.2011 1:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Even if it was pirithous on the photo, there still would be huge doubts about label, Imho...

05.04.2011 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Hey, we're not identifying it as "what do we have similar in Europe?" ;)) The label was definitely mistaken.

05.04.2011 1:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

All sources exclude Crimea :)

05.04.2011 1:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is no any more similar in Europe. If label was mistaken, then yes. :(

05.04.2011 1:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Added.

05.04.2011 0:58, Igor Sakhno:

Hm, all sources include Crimea.

05.04.2011 0:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

30th of November??? No way.

05.04.2011 0:50, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, this is not miracle at all, just mistaken labels (sorry to the author...). It's not pirithous. Either not Leptotes.

05.04.2011 0:39, Igor Sakhno:

Don't know, it's all named Crimea (this one also).

05.04.2011 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's true miracle! It looks mostly like Leptotes pirithous and if it's so, that's really miracle!

05.04.2011 0:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's a miracle! It looks mostly like Leptotes pirithous and if it's so, that's really miracle!

04.04.2011 23:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is no Hipparchia semele in Crimea but Hipparchia pellucida.

04.04.2011 23:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is no Hipparchia semele in Crimea but Hipparchia pellucida.

04.04.2011 22:27, Peter Khramov:

More than a hundred new photos by Vitaly Gumenyuk, Roman Romanov, Igor Sakhno, Dmitry and Yuri Semeykina Pozhogin. It goes without saying, with enlarged copies of ...

04.04.2011 21:49, Peter Khramov:

And if the sharpness is not required to clean greens in many cases, you can turn off without masks, a simple choice in the Hue / Saturation (green butterflies little benefit, although there are also yellow component plays an important role, but at the yellow butterflies has plenty of ...)

04.04.2011 21:47, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved. Alexandr, add synonym, please, if you're sure it has point. Ok?

04.04.2011 21:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr, it's already there named as Phragmatobia luctifera.

04.04.2011 21:07, Evgeny Komarov:

On the issue of "poison " green around and not only that you want to play - it is better to use a mask mute (in moderation) background and a little blur (better shumodava) - as a result of the object shooting just highlight (this works is often better than the rise of sharpness on the object). IMHO This is purely from my own experience.

04.04.2011 20:58, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen, pay attention to the following - primarily those who put daw "Do not edit", but other pictures too: If you're shooting butterflies on the hand / foot, consider the state of the of the hands / feet,Please pay special attention to the nails - in nature (and not in nature), they are rarely in good condition
If your pictures have previously set signatures, copyright, frames, chki ***** - once again I ask, remove them before downloading.At best, I can remove them from the damage to the image, in the worst (especially when put daw "Do not edit"), I simply do not publish - like, now online copyrights are placed centrally me before publication, so that your photos exposed not will
If you put daw "not edited"Do not forget to adjust the picture that it is 1024 pixels width or 724 in height (depending on the fact that first come out beyond the size designation).Again, not exactly 1024x768 (clearly the same as the aspect ratio can be different), and the refinement of 1024x768
If you have a butterfly takes 60% of the frame, ass she directed to the right and down, and head left-up, often still not worth it to sculpt unhappy zhivtone exactly the middle of the frame, well leave you to it space in front of the head for the sake of God, ?
In the field shooting in the frame is often a lot of greenery - in this case, please contact this green ponezhnee not to drive you its richness in poisonous filth, do not forget that in the frame even an animal is present, which is on this site, as a rule, still is the main object in the scene
Do not move from harshness.Generally, sharpness - it's good, and makruh it is often lacking, but the artificial its overabundance and turned away, as the oversupply of saturation, but also, do not forget that I still have a small copy of your picture to do, and in this case all of this wonderful perezkost general can go to waste
All the itemsexcept for the item on the frame and on the dimensions are not requirements and wishes - just look out for these common mistakes, do not forget that every rule has exceptions.

04.04.2011 20:37, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

04.04.2011 18:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Correct name is Korscheltellus lupulina.

04.04.2011 18:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why not, there it is in the database, even with 5 shots, if you're talking about Korscheltellus lupulinus.

04.04.2011 18:38, Peter Khramov:

Since Now I pre retouch not all photos, but only those for which the authors do not put daw ban on editing, in the signatures on the pages of the photos are now displayed information who the most advanced retouching (editing) picture wire - just the photographer or not only, or not photographer.

04.04.2011 18:29, Peter Khramov:

Guys, database the species, please.

04.04.2011 18:27, Peter Khramov:

Guys, what about this species is not yet databased, huh?

04.04.2011 12:05, Peter Khramov:

That was about "better" or "worse"?

04.04.2011 12:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.04.2011 12:02, Peter Khramov:

Guys, add species, please...

04.04.2011 11:57, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

No doubt, that's it. This is not the first shot, there are many of different butterflies... http://foto.mail.ru/mail/studio_argus/316/317.html.

04.04.2011 8:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Ormetica sypilus.

04.04.2011 4:48, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

http://www.vladphoto.ru/image.php?image_id=12074.

03.04.2011 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Now, not only displays information about the time adult flight, but also the lifetime of the tracks, not only the length of the wing, but wingspan. The first thing you need to understand why the second - that was the choice of how to count, or the length of the wing span, as well as to about the size was at least some information in cases where the length of the wing is not known.So far, data on these features on the site a little, they will appear only on pages with descriptions of species, when there will be more - it will be possible for them to make the selection in the catalog.

03.04.2011 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, thank you brought upon error. Who is corrected, we can safely navigate the page in large prevyuh.

03.04.2011 21:30, Evgeny Komarov:

BUT ... After 320 pixels photo output. and go to the next page, again, you get 80 pixels. Change to 320 ... and you get back to the start and has already scanned. We have to do something like personal settings for the user - so watch or commercials. In order not to switch every page, TBthat the picture in 500 of view in high resolution will not happen.

03.04.2011 21:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Super! I'm from the "happy owners 'including all very well become!

03.04.2011 18:31, Peter Khramov:

Happy owners of monitors with high resolution and fast Internet is dedicated to: is now in the list of the photo gallery can be viewed not only in the shallow (80 pixels), but the average (320 pixels) size.This image can be output as an additional signatures (species name or information that the species is not defined), and without signatures. In the new mode, additional rules to block the news, and the like is not shown, however, in Full HD resolution still images is removed only 5 in width. A similar feature has appeared in the catalog - you can now watch the sample not only in the form of small prevyuh plus additional information, but also in the form of photos of medium size, plus the name of the species (for species for which the site has Illustrations ).

03.04.2011 15:44, Peter Khramov:

Now finding involves not only species and taxa above species level, but also subspecies. Link thus leads to a page with a list of the parent species subspecies.

01.04.2011 11:01, Peter Khramov:

Sum up, that's it or not?

01.04.2011 5:03, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Gentlemen! Glad to hear that you like it :) I also had such blunders... long time ago and got it over :) As for software... maybe I should change some settings :) My monitor shows it rather good, even 200% scale :(

31.03.2011 23:33, Yuri Semejkin:

Roman! It's still questionable if it was honeysuckle whatsoever. I'll know it this year. If we meet up this Saturday, I can show you both the site and the tree.

31.03.2011 1:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Yeah, I can see the photo was originally not good. Sorry and sorry once more for such unreasonable harassment. :)

31.03.2011 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Look at the original photo there: http://lepidoptera.pro/8271.jpg. Height was 769 pix, so it had to be a little bit cut. Basically, he checked "No to any retouching" box, so I just cut it and got small photo, no more. For the large photo I used a new software, so there should be no blunders, and for small one I did old, so that can be somehow wrongly scaled.

31.03.2011 0:56, Peter Khramov:

Well, ok then, no fuss. Variety sounds cool.

31.03.2011 0:26, Igor Sakhno:

Yes, I even signed it "Oil on cardboard". I'm the author. This Sphingidae was caught in 1979, 27th of July, in Nikita. I had no good camera those days. 10 years after I made this picture using an expanded butterfly from a collection trying to be as more precise as it was possible, when depicted colors and position of the body, wings and other features. Think, it's rather piece of science that art.

30.03.2011 23:27, Evgeny Komarov:

One more version of the reasons of this noise is that, maybe, the sharpness was increased generally, all over the shot, and after that some noise was removed or just dark background was blurred. And the object was still outlined roughly and thin antennas got this noise around. I had such blunders, thanks God, so long time ago ;) Anyway, Evgeny, you know, Petr keeps talking that this website is not about photography and most photos are acceptable enough for a proper identifying. Not every user is bothered with the quality of large size, 800-1000 pix, shots :) Yet it's always nice to see decent, not somehow spoiled images here.

30.03.2011 23:13, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I mean large size. Think, Evgeny is right. This noise "rainbow" around antennas was just so glaring... Even though it's Apatura. ;)

30.03.2011 21:24, Evgeny Komarov:

I think, he means large size :) This is evident author's blunder, cause the sharpness was obviously increased rather roughly, the object was not outlined precisely, and some adjacent areas, colored way darker, were sharpened also. So that's the source of this "noise". It couldn't be like this considering Petr's general retouching. He definitely shouldn't do detailed retouching and remove noises and glitches from all photos!

30.03.2011 21:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

30.03.2011 21:11, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, do you mean 320 pixel shot or large size?

30.03.2011 20:24, Eugene Karolinskiy:

And I'm like a broken record... :) Petr (and Roman), I want to ask if this visual "noise" around antennas was in original shot or as a result of retouching? If last, put this retouching software to the garbage bin...

30.03.2011 20:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Suppose, identified. :)

30.03.2011 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Nobody is against. I'm just trying to realize if it should get "identified successfully" status or "uncertain".

30.03.2011 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moving.

30.03.2011 13:44, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Why not put that to Acronicta rumicis? Or am I wrong?

30.03.2011 13:27, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, identified or uncertain?

30.03.2011 12:44, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Yur, what honeysuckle was that on?

30.03.2011 12:37, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, there are great options for many previously uploaded photos. Gradually, they will lay out how to lay out all signal that remained there, to be able to reload.

30.03.2011 12:35, Peter Khramov:

Must be Igor, cause users can add only their own images... Let's not limit ourselves to photos only, but if there will be many pictures, we'll think about how to improve search to find only photos or pictures separatedly.

30.03.2011 11:39, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

30.03.2011 6:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I asked about the fate of the above pictures uploaded by the authors earlier to "revolution " with the size. If the author has shipped large (well, at least 800 or 600) - they have survived? Ie a great option would be online only for pictures after the revolution, or ...? If so, then the ability to edit your images for the authors is extremely necessary.At least the possibility of replacing old for new (although it is certainly not for everyone perhaps because there are already thousands).

30.03.2011 6:25, Evgeny Komarov:

I can guess, Igor is the author? If so, then let it be, even as picture, but... I'd prefer photos only.

30.03.2011 2:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Somehow I don't like this pic. Let's not precedent such. If photo, then photo. If it's picture, who is the author? What's source? Not funny. :(

30.03.2011 2:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO, Acronicta rumicis.

30.03.2011 2:14, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Melitaea didyma.

30.03.2011 1:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

30.03.2011 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, not by photos alone.

30.03.2011 1:26, Peter Khramov:

From Pozhogin Dmitry, Igor Sakhno, Roman Romanov, Yuri Semeykina, Oleg Seliverstov, Yuri Sokolkova and Rostislav Lezhoeva. All foty - just a larger version.

28.03.2011 20:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, so much so! At least development of the site is all sooner or later, but it will be!

28.03.2011 16:53, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Everything is fine

28.03.2011 16:36, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Second in Emmelina monodactyla
And why the total number has not changed my photos?
And why are they not loaded? There sleznevidkami ends and loaded there paltsekrylok

28.03.2011 16:33, Vitaly Gumenuk:

One found in Stenoptilia pterodactyla

28.03.2011 16:29, Vitaly Gumenuk:

They are not among the busiest and photos (in the database) remains unchanged)

28.03.2011 16:19, Peter Khramov:

Do not load or lost? According to one or archive?

28.03.2011 16:17, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Upload multiple paltsekrylok - gone

28.03.2011 16:05, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Trying

28.03.2011 15:50, Peter Khramov:

So. For those who do not want me to perform additional editing their images in the form of uploading photos will appear crow. Sure he is right, and do not want to I changed something - stamped when downloading photos this checkbox, and then I'll just scale and affix copyright, but not to change the color / tone and other trim.If this will fill Fautua fit into the dimensions of 1024x768, while the large pictures on her site, I will not even scale. Galka works for single photos and zip-archives. For those who are having trouble uploading photos (Especially through the zip-archives), the opportunity to select the type of file to be loaded.If there are no problems - nothing changes. If the problem is - stamped type - Jpeg (single kartnika) or Zip (download package through zip-archive). If all of a sudden and then it will not boot - let me know, we will check what was happening.

28.03.2011 14:28, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, plus there will only be pinched, and thus will need to enclose a separate megasystems to upload photos of not one but two types. Includes archives. Well, on the side of the photographer works increase. Ugh ...Here, Boris agree on the software part, might be able to still make sure that it was only possible to ship in 1024, and after that it itself would be scaled and koprayty arrange - if yes, then it would be nice.

28.03.2011 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, spammers are attacking again.

28.03.2011 13:09, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Petr! Kill 'em all (advertisers).

28.03.2011 11:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri! The increase in FSH little ph (scaling in your understanding) I even did not occur! This exactly, no one suggested :)

28.03.2011 9:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, but if I ask to send mail on copyright which you put on my photos? I'd just finished molded in size and laid out (large + small). About the size agrees. 1024. Let it be possible, and many other authors who puts a lot, do the same. With you a part of the technical work will act stupidly!

28.03.2011 2:38, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Chalk mountains do mean sooner Z. purpuralis. Was there thyme?

28.03.2011 1:22, Andrey Sazykin:

The size of the photo - completely agree.
Editing - completely agree.

27.03.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov:

There is a new “butterflies for exchange” service on Lepidoptera.pro for users who have some and want to change. I'll update it with detailed info later on.

UP: so details. Well, Stanislav Korb suggested some system for users could offer and exchange dried butterflies and moths. Today this system was launched in test mode for comments and discussions with Dmitry Podjogin's stuff as a pattern. It's worked out so as users could add info about butterflies in *.csv files (MS Excel and other electronic spreadsheets) in some common style what's better to discuss there, in this thread.
This system sorts and puts that info in order, gets it databased, after that it's available at the species description page and also at the Catalogue (if match the “Only species available for exchange” checkbox, you'll get only species those users have for change), for everybody curious about. Thus, people interested in exchanging may see at the species description page the list of users who have this very species, and therefore get in touch to someone using contacts at this someone's Lepidoptera.pro personal page.

To keep this service up to date users involved are considered to update properly info uploading new lists if changed, not only with species they've got for exchange lately but also those they already gave away.

As for limits to replies to such exchanging threads, there are no any. You even might contact someone not getting registered at the website, just look at who's changing at the moment and get in touch using personal contacts.

Limits for those with butterflies for exchange: you may offer only species illustrated with shots added and approved at Lepidoptera.pro, or ones supplied with some decent text info. Special privileges and partial or no limits might have website editors and other honored veterans who publish lots and even more.

Besides, maybe it would be better to organize also such service for sell, 'cos obviously sometimes it's easier to sell an item for money and buy another one than find someone who has butterflies your need as well as mutual interest in yours.
Now there is available only species info, but it will be expanded to subspecies classification later on with comments to each item getting changed, price in case it's for sell, and users ratings to exchange opinions on deals and dealers.

This service is a newborn, so please, leave comments, critics, suggestions, share your ideas and whatever.

There are some examples of how it works for those lazy: Catalogue checkbox matched, http://lepidoptera.pro/catalog/?goods=on, a species page, http://lepidoptera.pro/species/danaus-chrysippus/.

27.03.2011 18:21, Peter Khramov:

I stand in a separate news that more people noticed. So, based on the previous theme concludes prevyuh small addition, the site will be used photos of two sizes: 320px on the larger side (as now), plus a maximum of 1024x768 photos, when you open a 320-pixel Fautua.Why do even more - no one has explained, if there are opinions on this subject - write here.Whether to learn whether the program itself sculpt copyrights, those photographers who want to have their pictures have not been edited will be able to proceed as follows: upload photos surrounding daw "Do not edit" and then I have them I will only be scaled by the desired size and prosatvlyat copyrights, and color / tone / crop, etc.things will not change. At the same time, yes, the speed will be a little less direct publication and pinch once again have (here will be some loss of quality), but the working version of the direct publication and has not been found, so it will work on a compromise. So who is willing, who disagrees, who are thinking / Additions - write.

27.03.2011 18:16, Peter Khramov:

Removed.

27.03.2011 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Hosting Provider rubbing sprocket their servers, in this regard, many sites were not available, including and Lepidoptera.ru. Now everything should be OK.

27.03.2011 1:43, Peter Khramov:

Yuri, and no one offered to increase the picture shop, where is all this? It was a big load on truck and reduce their size if necessary.

27.03.2011 0:07, Yuri Semejkin:

By scaling I mean an increase in the editor. From a certain moment the picture begins to "float " (not only lost small parts). However, if in Photoshop to give an increase of 10%, increasing the border without losing quality somewhat relegated.Therefore, when shooting small natural objects, to make it look as it should make better use of the ring nozzle. Eugene! You yourself know all this .....

26.03.2011 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Agree, will fix that.

26.03.2011 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Messages need it. And since They are sorted by date, those that feel stale, you can simply browse ...

26.03.2011 16:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, put Niphonyx born with a tail (one typical mistake made my);)

26.03.2011 16:26, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

26.03.2011 14:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Yuri! Explain this: "Scaling distorts the details. But natural objects and should look as befits that are often difficult. " What do you mean by zooming in this case? When pruning, how it can distort the details?

26.03.2011 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, now is the admin picture, the correct definition, but in the catalog chehlikovyh family of moles is not given on the blue, and in Europe. (both systems are not true). Change the name to the right and go to the wrong directory.

26.03.2011 10:09, Yuri Semejkin:

Petr! Why delay? This is also Matov A. Yu.'s identifying. There are only two experts in the Russian Far East Noctuidae in the whole country, and Matov is one of these two. Got his "yes" to the authors's identifying and work place. You can check it up.

26.03.2011 10:03, Yuri Semejkin:

Large scale is not always (depending on the topic) is better. The editors of course have to use, but not very often. Scaling distorts the details. But natural objects and should look as befits that are often difficult. According to specialists komentam truth is, only the best results are not visible. Not so simple.

26.03.2011 9:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander! Categories of unidentified species to be three. Uncertain at all (in a pile as it is now), to certain family (see when viewing the family) and to a certain genus (visible when viewing the genus).In the list next to the number of families available in the database / directory of species are the number of indeterminate photos assigned to each family. Similarly - when viewing a list of genera. I, nevertheless, think that this somehow allows to structure the growing mountain of uncertain ph and facilitate the definition.Maybe we should do, and so that the pressing 'undefined "the user can see a list of families and genera, which are vague and photos go to uncertainty in a particular family / genus.

26.03.2011 9:17, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Maybe we should set about Posts butterflies clean (and then have 32 pages - what will happen next) Suppose there are only those with whom we have to work

26.03.2011 9:13, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Would be better to have all page numbers also at the bottom of a webpage, cause one should all the time scroll it up to change a page.

26.03.2011 8:28, :

You're all here sooo serious... life should be more goofy, huh ;))

25.03.2011 20:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

As an example, now is the admin Photo Coleophoridae, defined by the author as Incurvariidae. Now there are three categories: defined, the definition is doubtful and not certain. Then it is necessary to enter: some to the family and to a certain kind. It is necessary to it? Or look at the tails of all families in search of underdetermined :).

25.03.2011 18:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander! Why it is held on the same Plantarium? Naturally, there are no guarantees, but that there are competent members of the site who view uploaded and ruled an error, and without the participation of the Admin!

25.03.2011 18:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

I do not agree. If the type is not defined, the undefined, and how the expected kind of comment or family. Since there is not any Authorities issue a guarantee that they are defined correctly.

25.03.2011 17:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes! And when downloading to a certain genus or family should be, respectively, the authors have the opportunity, using the same auto-fit, just download the form to the genus or family!

25.03.2011 17:44, Evgeny Komarov:

With regards to the photos identified to genus or family only. Vitaly had in mind that it would be much better if such images once loaded, respectively, in the genus or family.Better in the first place so that the specialist (or consider themselves :)) on a certain group is not a bunch of shovels prevyushek (Solyanka) of undefined GENERAL ph, and opened to a page and saw a kind of pictures in which the insect is not identified to species but related by the author or moderators to this genus.Similarly - family. IMHO greatly simplify and speed up the identification. Well, not everyone has the time (and desire) to review several hundred different undetermined images and a dozen in a separate way is much easier to see.

25.03.2011 15:05, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Agree, my mistake.

25.03.2011 13:35, Peter Khramov:

Roman, what a teasing mood you are always in ;--))

25.03.2011 13:34, Peter Khramov:

Boris, there are no contradictions with your words, I do not. Just some of the questions can be left to the discretion of the authors of the pictures (you're right, and usually is), but you can not leave.Most of the photos uploaded to this site, come here in such a way as if the author or do not know the existence of what some Levels-s and Crop-s, or until very well is, in what direction images is changed, or just lazy do it.Yes, often there is nothing wrong globally, because the form is determined, and the pictures are not infinitely ugly, but simply unfinished. But I have the desire to foty site as possible were decent. Not a masterpiece, but decent as far as possible, given the quality of the originals and the number of images to be processed.So now all I edit photos before publishing them on the site, although some (5 percent or so) I just change the size and impose copyright, because in general agree with the author's version. Summary №1: preliminary Most editing photos need to be more or less decent. In all of this there are authors who A) ship images, from a technical (and sometimes artistic) point of view, the level is higher than the average for the hospital and b) do not want outside interference in their work.I can quite understand this, and so was born the idea to make an opportunity for people to load pictures that I will not change, and will soon approve for publication or disapprove. At the same time will increase and speed the publication of new photos, as the authors themselves can engage prostanovkoy copyright and sizes according to the requirements of the site.But!In the case except for very small prevyuh there are two sizes of photos (I repeat, does not matter what their limitations pixels, the main thing - they are still two versions), the system does not work, because an option when people ship, say, 1024 and a program online machine compresses up to 320 passes,because A) PHP shakes ratio size / quality noticeably worse normal bend and B) only normal copyright, which can be considered universal - with the same translucent and translucent shadow. When I looked at the possibility of putting this through PHP, I have not found.Perhaps, since anything has changed, and now it is quite a put down. It is also possible that PHP is now able to properly reap in Zhpeg. If you know of such improvements - reportedly will look at concrete examples. Summary №2: Authors have the right to download their pictures have not been edited further (cropping, color, etc.), But not yet fully defined as the opportunity to close up, taking into account the size of the two photons. With regards to copyrights as such (author of the image plus the address of the site) - this topic is not discussed, because these conditions have been affixed to the authors at the very beginning and, accordingly, the mountains loaded on truck loaded with this condition (it does not matter author insisted on it or not), and the address of the site is necessary becausefoty disperse in commercial quantities from other sites (even though it will be clear where taken), including and copies (in this case easier to prove the source). Summary №3: Copyright is necessary, and not when the author wants the picture, and always in the same format. And yes, Boris, at the moment I cast out before the publication of photos in 3 program, including manual editing of the Photoshop. Vitali, no torment no comment - it was good, and they are always welcome, especially specifics. Poor - otsustvtie this feedback.About icons / preview is no problem - you are on this site as soon as they see their boot images, for example. The problem is that large foty are not in the same size, and two (cm. Above).With regards to the photos identified to genus or other superspecies taxon - yes, you're right, it will be necessary to make this option more visible, but now kind of have to indicate or in a footnote or clarification to the definition of (different fields), while the photo ship as undetermined. Iethe problem itself is not too: you do not know - in Georgia is not certain without commentary, you know - in particular (with autosubstitution species) know is inaccurate - indicates supraspecific taxa in one of the fields.As for the editing of information - it is now there for unpublished images, be sure and published (except for the species, because after the publication of this issue should not be the direct responsibility of the author's picture). Phew. Like all otkommentil.Who has any thoughts - Wellcome, Boris, refines about PHP, maybe I really behind the times.

25.03.2011 12:51, Vitaly Gumenuk:

I have his comments probably tortured.
Expose your photos on two sites: macroid.ru and plantarium.ru - they are somewhat similar. Maybe we should do something similar. There's a great photo exhibit (limited size) and from the icons are the correct size. At both sites the identification of good and convenient accommodation.Yesterday, for example, I agonized with the placement of moles that are identified to genus. On plantarium no such problem: you do not know - is placed in a section of unidentified, you know kind of - the section of vague, you know for sure - in certain (search by Latin and Russian names). Almost similar for makroide.And given the possibility of correcting the authors contributed to the information (the one in the database).
I do not know what to advise :-(

25.03.2011 12:38, Vladimir Mescheryakov: This species is identified correctly.

25.03.2011 12:37, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

Looks like Goldia pacifica :) Or not?

25.03.2011 12:37, Boris Loboda:

Well usually do thumbnails (which is necessary) - this is understandable. The average size - limiting the size for comfortable viewing on the page (usually in the range of 800 ... 1200). And if uploaded more photos - View original (if the author has decided to show the size of this - why not give the opportunity to watch it).
Iestore thumbnails of different sizes (in the limit of one), the average size of the original - if the photo is greater than the average size, or just the original (which is smaller than the average size).
According to copyright - I think a feature is not particularly in demand. If the author wants it badly, he usually puts, although I do not know - maybe then someone and insisted.Judging by makroidu / makroklubu / molbiol with tens of thousands of photos - automatic "kopirayteniem " was not much concerned about, at least I do not remember some heated discussions on this subject ... If the author wants it badly - he usually signed himself original and it is generally in the preparation of photo technology is already incorporated.About lousy compression and very good labels in PHP - what they mean specifically? It is through the GDI as I understand it. The degree of compression jpg where indicated. Applied more than once - like the special problems are not met. There is even a transparent overlay layer, alpha-blending of type png, you can superimpose watermarks ...Are you saying that you're forced through the photos handed some programs before they get to the site ??? Duck because no one else does, and that is when you have lost the inspiration ...

25.03.2011 12:03, Peter Khramov:

Boris, author photos need to pinch, because in most cases they require treatment, and where there is no demand, you need to hang copyrights on two sizes - medium and large, and decrease with more on average and automatically put a copyright means PHP is no desire, that is, .K. compresses it sucks, and the inscription puts too much is not good. Most of the galleries is molded for photographers. And this site - not photographic. Surely the quality of photons is not noticeable? The author can decide a lot of things, it may decide that the phot 2000 pixels - that's good.And when used on this site - 2000 pixels for the original well, because in 90% of cases downloadable foty need sprinkled, but not for the final photo to view.It is the size of 320 took out that at the beginning of the site, many thematic resources published foty about this size and would not agree to issue a large republication, while 320 in most cases you can see the same number of really important, as for 2000.At the same time, I agree that large foty also needed, because, in fact, run in the system now, and their publication with your help. Eugene, it's not about whether to keep the pages 320 and 600. The thing to do that will still be two basic sizes - medium and large, and can not be of a large machine to make intermediate (cm. above). And that is a problem.And how to solve - not a banner. For it is not the same ship foty in two sizes? I guess I still have to pinch again, not changing anything other than copyright and size that, if ...Many foty, of course, there is a large amount, is now loaded to only part of an experiment to determine already exactly to what extent that mold, and then we load all that is. ZY And the size of the 320 is still not completely go away, because the illustrations for the descriptions on a large scale is clearly not good. Vitaly, I'm just trying to build a site that he was comfortable. If you see any shortcomings in this area - please specify the specific embodiments, which is inconvenient now?

25.03.2011 11:47, Peter Khramov:

Vitaly, but I do not have it. I'm not to the fact that people do not use, and to ensure that people are not waiting and loads more.

25.03.2011 9:14, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Previously limited size of the photo to save memory. Now like this it is not necessary. Maybe we should build a site so that it was convenient to users? and with minimal (physical and temporal) cost of its maintenance?

25.03.2011 9:09, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Peter! And where is she? I, once, could not find it. I, of course, a kettle, but there may be still some - maybe it's worth to do it somehow "Naveed " that no unnecessary movements?

25.03.2011 8:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! IMHO optimally load the author of more photos, set certain limits on the size in pixels and the "weight " and keep them in the original by clicking to view, and can be left on the page, and as in the previous trial version, ie 600 pixels.Size 320 is suitable for preview, and yet no more, although here and even managed to determine for such pictures :)
Well, this question: photos which the authors previously loaded with the size of at-least 700-800 pixels, sozraniv in your database? Or only 320?

25.03.2011 0:22, Boris Loboda:

And where did the idea of ​​a general microscopic pictures - someone insisted? Like most of the gallery houses the originals, as the author has decided - and shows.

25.03.2011 0:19, Boris Loboda:

Few understand why bother to squeeze / pinch the author's photographs.

24.03.2011 21:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, only this one. Vitaly added many photos of this species, one was named mistakenly.

24.03.2011 20:48, Peter Khramov:

All is good, but because in addition to a preview of the site is now used two sizes of photons, I do not know how to pile on truck loading system ready. Just great in smaller scale will not work - will fly copyright and make shipping two types of truck - is also wrong.Maybe then wishing unedited photos upload Krupnyakov without copyright, and I only scale and copyrights paste? Compression is now quite a decent sort of went ... And Vitali, clearly, look, nothing is waiting, and continues to ship foty for editing ...
What say, photographers?

24.03.2011 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Photos nearby are too?

24.03.2011 18:38, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Come on, let it be 1024x768, does not matter))

24.03.2011 18:27, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Come on, let it be 1024x768, does not matter))

24.03.2011 18:20, Peter Khramov:

Why bring up to 1200? That there will be this new? And that should do 20% of people who have 1024? And where will foty 1200, nenuzhdayuschiesya pruning?

24.03.2011 18:18, Peter Khramov:

1. What?
2. In what sense? And what is she now does not match?
3. I wrote - a maximum of 1024x768.

24.03.2011 18:18, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Yes, it was much better! The maximum size can be increased to 1200 on the long side, as already mentioned above.

24.03.2011 18:13, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Update: this is not sylvina but Korscheltellus lupulinus.

24.03.2011 17:42, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Looked:
1. better if the images of 600 pixels
2. Big picture should match the size of the exposed photo. Still, compressive quite noticeable loss of quality
3. In order to put up a photo You can set the size limit. Let's say 1200 on the 900 (large scarcely fit on the screen). Weight is also possible to limit the file (say 800 Kb)

24.03.2011 16:04, Peter Khramov:

So. Pictures of 600 pixels is no longer displayed. Showing 320. In the case of stock imetsja Fota larger fine phot becomes clickable, and it appears under the "Click on the picture to enlarge." Consequently, the press, it increases.One can picture you can scroll (if other foty of this kind there is only minor, will appear smaller). Most Fota - limit 1027h768 pixels (though many smaller pictures even in the original, but still more than 320). In addition, the shake is now another program foty ratio provides better size / quality.Watch, comment, wait yet.

24.03.2011 15:45, Peter Khramov:

Now completely redo everything. It will be ready - accomplish your goal.

24.03.2011 14:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! The current version of the "wheels " because definitely better than what it was, and yet it is. But surely it is impossible to make a full-size photos were tied up pictures where they are (full-size preview by clicking on the button ...)? I recently less than 800 on the big and I send syuda.Smotrel K.Kraevskogo full length - it's quite another thing!

24.03.2011 13:51, Yuri Semejkin:

Not FEB RASOp, but FEB RAS.

24.03.2011 12:20, Peter Khramov:

If you need polnorazmer then current version does not roll. A ready-made photo does not help, because where copyright is needed, and needed a photo of two sizes (except preview).

24.03.2011 11:25, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. It looks like the system for uploading photos without editing on my part no one needs ...

24.03.2011 11:23, Peter Khramov:

So what, move to Epatolmis caesarea or? P. S. Imho is an abbreviation IMHO, stands for "in my humble opinion".

24.03.2011 11:18, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Understood

24.03.2011 10:58, Yuri Semejkin:

This is not my name and Chistyakov either. My album has no any file named like this. So, either it's some technical bug (not mine), or the human, as it's called today, factor.

24.03.2011 10:38, Evgeny Komarov:

To avoid artifacts in the course of treatment at the site can recommend the authors to lay out ready, ie 600 pixels. and then on the big software huddle only preview that is not essential. But here, too, it is not good ... When we will live up to what you can see and (if desired) 1100 pix.as Plantarium (also started with 600 for large), photo, laid before the smaller will lose. Including yet let it be so, but the recommendations of computation photo ask (if possible) not less than 1100 width and 800 height. In order to reserve for the future it was.

24.03.2011 10:19, Vitaly Gumenuk:

It is already possible to identify - much better detail.
And will be able to somehow enter the full-size photo provided by the author?

24.03.2011 10:14, Vitaly Gumenuk:

25 to expose pictures - how to move to the next page?

24.03.2011 9:30, Yuri Semejkin:

Pardon, I seemed to confuse something uploading images. Checked out my folder and found different name, Epatolmis caesarea.

24.03.2011 9:21, Yuri Semejkin:

As for bug. Chistyakov examined this caterpillar with me nearby. He called it Arctiidae. Latin name was also given by him. There was also one more entomologist with us. Since I'm not one (and there happen to be some contradictions in this "entoworld"), so I applied to this image the info about author's identifying. Not to confuse who identified that first. By the way, there are some more questionable photos what cause such disputes between experts. A propos, Evgeny, explain, please, what's IMHO?

24.03.2011 1:20, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. No Action, and the package has a Coy. Right now, let's see, maybe it is in the world Happiness ...

24.03.2011 1:16, Peter Khramov:

I shake FastStone 'om, because there is a convenient batch mode. Photoshop shakes much better ratio size / quality, but I have it trimmed version, where there is no batch mode and action games ...

24.03.2011 0:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

PS: In case _lyubom_, larger scale definitely better. Earlier signs and a few do not always see it was possible.

24.03.2011 0:56, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO, very visible artifacts jpeg-a. Such whether they were in the original? The processed (cropped / scale) photos?

24.03.2011 0:40, Peter Khramov:

UP: the system is changed, now foty output of 320, and clicking on them you can see larger versions (if they have a website) - see details. below in the comments to this theme.
Published the first 560 images measuring at 320 as before, and 600 pixels on the large side.The people, especially who offered to publish large foty, ask to speak, if all satisfied, you sculpt the rest foty in this spirit, etc. You can view the example of the last photos of Vitaly Gumenyuk: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/?prec=all&fem=0&people=68&perpage=50&order=dt

23.03.2011 21:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Family scoops, then only by analogy - if you photographed? To time at other angles, it is possible and to species. and so ...

23.03.2011 19:45, Peter Khramov:

People, look picture http://lepidoptera.ru/mn.jpg
Photographed in Uzbekistan camel thorn. To what level taxa can be determined?

23.03.2011 16:50, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Pleased, I identified that right.

23.03.2011 16:50, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Glad to know my identifying is successful.

23.03.2011 16:49, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Glad to know I identified that right.

23.03.2011 16:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved. In addition, these fixed bugs still have a couple of dozen genera. The cause glitches removed. Or one of the reasons.

23.03.2011 16:46, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Agree.

23.03.2011 16:45, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Approve.

23.03.2011 16:43, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Agree.

23.03.2011 16:36, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Approve.

23.03.2011 16:36, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Agree.

23.03.2011 16:27, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved, species activated.

23.03.2011 16:26, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Agree.

23.03.2011 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

23.03.2011 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Z. loti.

23.03.2011 16:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Z. loti.

23.03.2011 16:20, Peter Khramov:

Information for downloading photos: previously, if you've downloaded a lot of pictures, the relevant section of the Personal Cabinet, is responsible for editing the data for them, could slow down. Now, there is selection automatically beats on page 25 shots, respectively, no longer braking should not be.But now, do not forget these very pages flip ...

23.03.2011 16:15, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Approve.

23.03.2011 16:13, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Agree.

23.03.2011 16:06, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Agree.

23.03.2011 15:55, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Can be, can be.

23.03.2011 15:52, Vitaly Gumenuk: This species is identified correctly.

23.03.2011 15:46, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Agree.

23.03.2011 15:37, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Probably, Z. loti.

23.03.2011 15:36, Vitaly Gumenuk: This species is identified correctly.

23.03.2011 15:34, Vitaly Gumenuk: This species is identified correctly.

23.03.2011 15:33, Vitaly Gumenuk:

My mistake, was shot at Voronezh region, Pavlovsky hood, Petrovka village neighborhood, Shypov forest.

23.03.2011 15:33, Vitaly Gumenuk: This species is identified correctly.

23.03.2011 15:31, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Hard to say, but seems to be identified correctly.

23.03.2011 15:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, transfer the added labor (with views and photos) in seeds Island Riodinidae from the database to the directory!

23.03.2011 15:01, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

23.03.2011 15:01, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

23.03.2011 14:13, Peter Khramov:

The first group of users joined Svyatoslav Knyazev.

23.03.2011 14:00, Peter Khramov:

For vegetable garden allowed Svyatoslav Knyazev. Standard version extended the right to edit and view.

23.03.2011 13:50, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, Dmitry, if approve, do the species...

23.03.2011 13:49, Peter Khramov:

Deal, moved.

23.03.2011 13:48, Peter Khramov:

If someone has a problem with loading new topics / messages - send me an e-mail.

23.03.2011 13:45, Peter Khramov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/2008.djvu

23.03.2011 13:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hang up, please, somebody once moths catalog Sineva in deja vu !!!

23.03.2011 12:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! Move as Dmitry identified!

23.03.2011 11:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Imperatrix de Nicéville subspecies, 1899.

23.03.2011 11:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Graphium sarpedon luctatius subspecies, Fruhstorfer, 1907.

23.03.2011 11:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Parides erithalion erlaces male.

23.03.2011 3:35, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Sphacelodes vulneraria
http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Andes%20-%20Sphacelodes%20vulneraria.htm.

22.03.2011 23:47, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Hm, some technical bug, maybe. Yu. A. Chistyakov could hardly identified it like this. Imho, this is some Arctiidae. (Just for the record, there is no A. statices in Primorye region at all).

22.03.2011 23:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Probably, Z. loti.

22.03.2011 23:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

How come two shots are dated the same day, 2008/6/18 and 2008/6/18, but made in different places, Voronezh region, Pavlovsky hood, Petrovka village neighborhood, Shypov forest, and Vladimir region, Krasny Mayak forestry? What's true? These shots seem to be of the same caterpillar.

22.03.2011 23:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not minos. Probably, Z. loti.

22.03.2011 23:38, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not minos. May be Z. loti.

22.03.2011 23:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not trifolii. ?Z. viciae.

22.03.2011 23:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not trifolii. ?Z. viciae.

22.03.2011 23:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

There is no trifolii In Russia accorded to Synev-Efetov. This might be Z. lonicerae.

22.03.2011 23:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

There is no trifolii in Russia, according by Synev-Efetov. Seems to be Z. lonicerae.

22.03.2011 21:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Acronicta megacephala.

22.03.2011 21:35, Peter Khramov:

Predator.

22.03.2011 21:18, Peter Khramov:

From Semeykina Yuri and Nikolai Vladimirov Evgeny Komarov and Dmitry Pozhogin, Vitaly Gumenyuk and Igor Sakhno.

22.03.2011 20:56, Peter Khramov:

Goes to ino.

22.03.2011 20:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to ino.

22.03.2011 19:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Think, this is B. ino too.

22.03.2011 19:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Hm, doubt my own identification... :) Sorry... Rather B. ino.

22.03.2011 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

22.03.2011 14:05, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.03.2011 13:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

That's it. Zanclognatha fumosa (Butler, 1879).

22.03.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Caligula boisduvalii.

22.03.2011 13:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.03.2011 13:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Hi there! The third stage of this caterpillar you identified as #6372: Caligula boisduvalii. So why this one, the first stage, and further also are undetermined? This is the same caterpillar.

22.03.2011 13:05, Peter Khramov:

Dear gentlemen moderators, if approve, add new species and genus.

22.03.2011 13:04, Peter Khramov:

Goes from Melitaea cinxia to Melitaea athalia.

22.03.2011 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.03.2011 13:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes from Brenthis ino to Boloria dia.

22.03.2011 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Argynnis niobe to Argynnis adippe.

22.03.2011 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Argynnis niobe to Brenthis daphne.

22.03.2011 12:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Brenthis ino.

22.03.2011 12:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Nymphalis xanthomelas.

22.03.2011 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.03.2011 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to reducta.

22.03.2011 12:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. ilia.

22.03.2011 12:55, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. ilia.

22.03.2011 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Went to U. michaelis.

22.03.2011 12:53, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

22.03.2011 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Soonest Crambidae Spilomelinae. :))

22.03.2011 11:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Vitaly, agree, but sooner Crambidae :) :)

22.03.2011 11:24, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.

22.03.2011 11:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Erebia ligea, Linnaeus, 1758.

22.03.2011 10:52, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Pyralidae.

22.03.2011 10:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! View Ussuriana michaelis (Oberthür, 1880) is not associated with native Ussuriana, while a page with a description and photo of the form there!

22.03.2011 10:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve!

22.03.2011 9:30, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Thank you, I will consider and try to make my photos require minimal intervention :-)))

22.03.2011 1:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

A. ilia.

22.03.2011 1:53, Eugene Karolinskiy:

A. ilia.

22.03.2011 1:51, Eugene Karolinskiy:

L. reducta.

22.03.2011 1:49, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2011 1:44, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO N. xanthomelas.

22.03.2011 1:44, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO N. xanthomelas. Definitely not aglaia since it's willow tree.

22.03.2011 1:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO B. ino.

22.03.2011 1:39, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2011 1:39, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

22.03.2011 1:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

B. daphne.

22.03.2011 1:30, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M. athalia.

22.03.2011 1:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

B. dia.

22.03.2011 1:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

B. dia.

22.03.2011 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

A. adippe.

21.03.2011 23:27, Yuri Semejkin:

Zanclognatha fumosa. Identified by Biology Ph.D. Candidate Matov. A. Yu., ZIN RAS.

21.03.2011 21:52, Peter Khramov:

Madness of the brave ...

21.03.2011 21:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! RAW managed to download;) It happens ...

21.03.2011 20:59, Peter Khramov:

In the gallery section of another replenishment.

21.03.2011 19:02, Peter Khramov:

Notes, of course. Right now I edit your photos.Already I studied the habits of many photographers: -) Do you often such variants: the location of the object in the center, with no reserve space on the part of the head (or, I cut the back / bottom), underfulfilled contrast (see bar chart?) Nedoubit green (he often climbs on the foliage is too poisonous / oversaturated for photos, where basically all the same butterfly - floor is not good). Like that.But I mean not only like editing, but was adjusted to the size of photons on the site, affixing copyright (essno, it's all done automatically for all photos at once, but still be extra care).

21.03.2011 18:22, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Peter, in fact I am preparing images: cropped, corrective color (to be close to the natural one). Or have any comments?

21.03.2011 18:15, Peter Khramov:

And someone has a bunch of information on these countries?

21.03.2011 17:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Moldova and Belarus will not forget

21.03.2011 17:26, Peter Khramov:

Speed ​​prezhdnemu not stay - especially for this new version of the soda and that was the choice. But if you choose a new option will be added preparatory work in order to adjust to the requirements of foty site ...

21.03.2011 17:24, Peter Khramov:

Still "uncertain".

21.03.2011 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Goes to I. vitrea.

21.03.2011 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.03.2011 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

21.03.2011 17:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.03.2011 17:21, Peter Khramov:

To go.

21.03.2011 16:37, Peter Khramov:

More about the countries. Alexander Zhakov sent an updated version of checklist, there now being cleared his notation, but it seems that there is much geography more relevant than in the version of that site.In general, it is possible, first export the data from there (by the way, and the system is also, perhaps, is to upgrade the Old globally), and then lay out editing to manually plow in vain that, it seems, will be done automatically.

21.03.2011 16:34, Evgeny Komarov:

That really handles to feel, how it will be, and then determine how fine :)

21.03.2011 15:53, Evgeny Komarov:

That's why I put it as questionable, but only this suits from Guyana ones. Probably, dark spots just vary in size, didn't notice other serious differences except some reduction of pattern.

21.03.2011 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Editing countries: you can choose from that list, there is now, and even add Russia and Ukraine. Ie for the first time udet intersection of the USSR and Russia, and then, when the Russian Federation in the amount of normlano typed, you can just leave it. Fine?

21.03.2011 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Don't think it's sobrina, this genus has many similar species, we should check it somewhere else.

21.03.2011 11:48, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.03.2011 11:48, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.03.2011 11:45, Evgeny Komarov:

? Lophocampa sobrina (Stretch, 1872).

21.03.2011 10:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Limacodidae, Sibine sp. Can be also stimulea, Clemens, 1860, there are many but no photos found!

21.03.2011 10:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Trichromia androconiata, Rothschild, 1909.

21.03.2011 10:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Trichromia androconiata, Rothschild, 1909.

21.03.2011 10:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Epimolis incarnata female (Hampson, 1901).

21.03.2011 9:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Idalus vitrea (Cramer, 1780).

21.03.2011 8:39, Vitaly Gumenuk:

I'm more important than the speed of publication. If it remains the same, then until April 15, I will be able to set only a couple of families (photographs whose representatives I have some). For the scoop I am afraid even to his brother: I have more than 8,000 pictures, after my selection (it may take a week of daily labor) will be more than 500 (one more week to vystalenie).

21.03.2011 5:16, :

Dmitry, thanks a lot for protection! I'll check out this website right today. As for copying stuff, I agree. By the way, for diurnals they stole not only Landman;) That's for sure a bi-i-i-i-igie minus to them!

21.03.2011 0:57, Victoria Kiselova: This species is identified correctly.

21.03.2011 0:01, Peter Khramov:

Goes to M. clarissa.

21.03.2011 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thank you.

20.03.2011 23:18, Evgeny Komarov:

Correct!

20.03.2011 23:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Miresa clarissa (Stoll, 1790).

20.03.2011 23:05, Peter Khramov:

Vitaly, a new variant only affects the appearance and speed of publication of the photographs. Editing for both variants is the same. Now - just before publication, I will do in the future so that you can edit and then (but not belonging to the species).
ZY Automatic publication of pictures there will be in the new version.I just edit them in any way will not, and will soon approve or reject for publication.

20.03.2011 23:02, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

20.03.2011 23:01, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

20.03.2011 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, why here and here http://lepidoptera.ru/species/paracossulus-thrips/ http://lepidoptera.ru/species/paracossulus-thrips/ no commentary about the transfer? I asked to do after all ...

20.03.2011 22:45, Peter Khramov:

New pictures in the gallery today, a little bit - 55 pieces, but just eight authors - Andrey Ponomarev, Dmitry Pozhogin, Constantine Krajewski, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Yuri Semeykina, Roman Romanov, Evgeny Azhipy and Igor Sakhno.

20.03.2011 21:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For those who live in the European part of Russia the best website is http://sungaya.narod.ru/rhop/index.htm. There is also identifier and no flubs.

20.03.2011 21:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

12-aged is not already a babe! For me there is nothing interesting at www.danaida.ru. No identifier I found. Lots of mistakes. As for diurnals, it's all copied from a Wijbren Landman book. And images are all from that. It might be more interesting for beginning amateurs to look at images. Sad.

20.03.2011 21:20, Peter Khramov:

Heard, Dmitry... Out of the mouths of babes. And you are all about systematics and systematics...

20.03.2011 20:36, :

Weeeeeel... First, I'm not a pro yet. Second, I'm just 12 and third: this is the best website of all I found; the rest are real "EW-W-W". And fourth: that's why I'm here, to GET EXPERIENCED...

20.03.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.03.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

To go.

20.03.2011 19:47, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I removed.

20.03.2011 15:16, Victoria Kiselova:

I think, that can be Cerura felina or Cerura vinula. Doubtful.

20.03.2011 14:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It's not even for somebody. Various images picked out of different sources, that's all. No any systematics.

20.03.2011 12:44, :

This is just not for everybody but somebody.....:(

20.03.2011 12:13, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Well, I'll wait, since I ship the old expensive - a lot is already there, and the detection of errors a lot of time is spent in the correction loaded. By the way, the new version will be possible to correct errors (naprmer when instead of tracks indicated imago)

20.03.2011 10:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Correct my marriage - in the family-ve added Limacodidae Get me "race " stimulea Clemens, 1860 - species accidentally in the family instead of the sort!

20.03.2011 10:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Limacodidae, Sibine ?stimulea Clemens 1860 or close species.

20.03.2011 9:23, Peter Khramov:

So, who are interested in ready-made version of the boot images (podrobonee - http://lepidoptera.ru/community/5047/) - pauses and download new foty about April 1-5. During this time I doopublikuyu that is already loaded and completed a system to download the photos ready for publication (it will be ready, will post more news).Those who want to ship the old may continue to ship the old now, do not wait.

20.03.2011 8:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Oxydia sp. (Geometridae, Ennominae).

20.03.2011 8:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Oxydia sp. (Geometridae, Ennominae). Dmitry's "not sure" was not vain ;)

20.03.2011 8:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Oxydia sp. (Geometridae, Ennominae).

20.03.2011 8:02, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

20.03.2011 8:02, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

20.03.2011 8:00, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

20.03.2011 7:53, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

20.03.2011 7:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Right. Siga liris (Cramer 1775), Crambidae. http://www.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=349881.

19.03.2011 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Angelet 13, the website is nothing indeed.
And there is no need to shout here. No hearing handicapped.

19.03.2011 21:33, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Siga liris ?
http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Andes%20thumbs%20-%20moths%202.htm.

19.03.2011 21:32, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Siga liris ?
http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Andes%20thumbs%20-%20moths%202.htm.

19.03.2011 13:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, I am contacted Gumenyuk, there had been a lot of typos probably really trying to fix through a personal account lead to the return of the photos in the admin panel in experimental, it will just kopirot name from the directory. :)

19.03.2011 12:32, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, if this photo of the same author, it may then ruled by the data from the LC or the ship takes. You can contact him? Or tell me that in the photo and the author ...
Dmitry, I told him accomplish your goal ...

19.03.2011 11:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, for the fourth time in the admin area of ​​the photo returned, this is funny? or the need to remove all kinds of people? I do not want to compete with Sisyphus. :-)

18.03.2011 20:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Vitaly something right. I have already given Plantarium as an example to follow. It is extremely convenient sold (including loading, where the user downloads the image directly to the form - if you know, and only then expressed opinion, if there are dissenting. As a result, a photo or a "hanging " to a certain kind, or moved to the appropriate.And all of these procedures are carried out registered users (not even modernizing). I do not offer a tracing, but much worth taking out.

18.03.2011 18:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Checked out all mine. All are Colobura dirce, meh.

18.03.2011 17:07, :

Well! I have too one very good Lepidoptera website name. THERE: www.danaida.ru. The website is cool! MY WORD!!!!!!!!! There is world of families!!! Whole, well identifier, and for rookies, this is a blast!!!

18.03.2011 12:33, Vitaly Gumenuk:

It must lie on the surface and it is necessary to get to the main page :-))) IMHO

18.03.2011 11:34, Peter Khramov:

Hmm, so it is not exactly the same definition in the gallery. Or is not it?

18.03.2011 10:03, Vitaly Gumenuk:

If you do not do self-access, soon everything will be (known sites is growing, hence the number of exposed photos, too, will grow), I have created plugging. Stretching reduces the timing of publication of photos of interest. Well, this process is adjusted on the site vegetation http://www.plantarium.ru/ - may make sense something and learn.Large photos are necessarily necessary - little it very difficult process to determine if such a need arises.
No need to adjust authors - shall bear full responsibility for the quality of the submitted images.
Admins should have the right to remove the photos do not meet the requirements of the site.Be sure to be split is not completely certain objects - to facilitate the access of users who want to apply their knowledge (not to force them to climb on the entire array)

18.03.2011 7:03, Evgeny Komarov:

For example, I do not need. Much more important to finish the ability to view large photos (IMHO).

18.03.2011 0:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Svyatoslav Knyazev moderators do not want to invite ???

17.03.2011 23:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

I got it.

17.03.2011 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Once again, pay attention: the old boot mode in any case will remain, the only question is whether to supplement it with new.

17.03.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov:

I want to bring up for discussion the next topic concerning everyone who downloads the photos to the site. At the moment, reminding, the algorithm is as follows: the photographer loads foty one or the archive, if necessary, edit the data about them, and then I treat every photos (cropping, color and so on.), Add the copyright of the form (a) FirstName LastName, Lepidoptera.ru, and publish the resulting images. Before treatment, some still photos culled. In this algorithm has two significant drawbacks: 1 - I regularly delay publication of pictures, some may wait for a week or more, while I'll get to them. Stupidly do not have time because of the volume.2 - If the photo is important to keep a picture in the form in which it sees fit (the same crop, color), it will not succeed, because I'm all fotam passers-by and the opinions of our photographer about what is good, what is bad, They may not be the same.From this comes the idea: to make as an option (it is an option, but not the obligation) to those (especially for keen photographers who download a lot of pictures) the ability to load images once the desired size as necessary processed and subscribe to the site, after which I undertake not to affect their artistic component,but only to approve or not to approve for publication. Ie Photos of Georgia does not like now pictures arbitrary quality / size and ready foty with all the colors / tones / sharpness and scraps of 320 pixels on the longer side (for illustrations) and the larger version for the gallery (that look completed yet is still big ph).Question to all: you have it or not?
ZY If it is now in such a foty shipping is not necessary. If you agree that such a thing is done, there will be a special subsystem for integration of images from the site.

17.03.2011 22:37, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, what is Admin, and how bad to fall from the unknown: -)
Vitali, here we are talking about yet unpublished photographs - there are only arms can check whether it is an error while loading or, say, the type in the database is simply no ...

17.03.2011 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved to N. andetria.

17.03.2011 22:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, why return to the admin photo Gumenyuk, some twice already corrected?

17.03.2011 17:24, Vitaly Gumenuk:

By the way, it would be nice if an erroneous determinations were messages on e-mail.

17.03.2011 17:22, Vitaly Gumenuk:

From today, all that exhibition - check. Thank you.

17.03.2011 0:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Request to Gumenyuk Vitaly, check the names of butterflies on the base, and that is because of communication errors in large quantities in the admin fall.

16.03.2011 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Understand, the situation is similar to that of Svyatoslav, only in emphasis can not understand why at first it was OK, but now - no. If someone else files will be shipping - please, normally ship began to fail, or too ...

16.03.2011 16:29, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Download it properly - to the site is gone, the site received them, but, as I understand it, did not work the script that should unzip zip files. And instead of photo files from the archive files I see :)

16.03.2011 12:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Zhdems!

16.03.2011 10:54, Peter Khramov:

But this is sverhinteresno. Previously, all the boot up normally, but now is not?

16.03.2011 10:53, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, Petr Khramov, 20:28 15.03.2011.

16.03.2011 6:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Well then makes editing!

16.03.2011 3:04, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Something is wrong with downloading files. Uploaded - I want to see, and there instead of a set of images files themselves :)

15.03.2011 22:10, Peter Khramov:

On the issue of whether or not easier - in advance asking for anyone who is against. Regarding castration - the principle of data on the site, if given, then there is, but if not specified - does not mean that there is. I'd love to do to ne_ukazanie space / time, etc. there is no kind of meant something then or something. But for such a volume of species is impossible.

15.03.2011 21:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I'm in the official responsible for the fact that the spread that is displayed on the page of the form was taken from the European checklist (to commentaries about orbitulus).
Even I immediately (BMinformed about the situation) is not included about European checklist! But just who visited "Kettle " take at face value, and knowing laugh (the site claims to be the coverage of the world fauna) ...This is the question of the need to urgently do something with the data on the spread! Maybe it is easier to clean all that displayed recently? Maybe easier to scratch than to rule the Soviet Union and other miracles? For now, the species with the Eurasian, evrosibirskimi, Trans and other wide area on the site made "castration " distribution.

15.03.2011 21:24, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

I think that such action is simply vital because every day you will be more and more difficult to cope with the influx of processing photos! I would say that it is possible to focus at this stage on makroid.ru where it's implemented and very convenient to operate. and the influx is such that no one has time to rake))

15.03.2011 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, if it was to give access, would long ago have given. There should be a system for editing of pile up, and it's a little more complicated. But the signal is realized all do.

15.03.2011 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Tellingly, no one bothers to make both choices. If someone is able to do an adequate breakdown of the primitiveness - there are no technical problems. This convenient - will be pushed back in the evolutionary sort who inconvenient - in alphabetical order.

15.03.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Vitali, and that you do not zaloginivaytes of comments on the site? Et wrong, because without anyone can login to the system under whose name you want to write.I understand that the probability is not very high, but still requested to order zaloginivatsya, okay? With regard to the processing of the brakes on truck, then in dialogue with the idea of ​​Svyatoslav as pile megasystems to advanced Find Topics Find Topics could do all the shipping.So the prospects for change the situation quite a imyuetsya! Well, by itself, I will try to handle identity.

15.03.2011 20:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, I wrote to you, when there were no rescheduled :)
Peter! It is urgent to make access to editing Modera distribution. There are so many things NOT SO! TB the amount of editing there is crazy.

15.03.2011 17:27, :

Here, said: 123 rob moles of different photos and Nymphalidae 175

15.03.2011 17:23, :

I uploaded about 200 pictures and as many more are ready to download. The fact that with such an amount of pictures becomes almost impossible their correction - a lot of time spent

15.03.2011 17:22, :

I uploaded about 200 pictures and as many more are ready to download. The fact that with such an amount of pictures becomes almost impossible their correction - a lot of time spent

15.03.2011 17:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Vitaly, and you ship until all that is - all gradually lined.

15.03.2011 16:57, :

Just in April, it will end free time and will not be able to put anything until October

15.03.2011 15:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Vitaly! You are not the only one :)

15.03.2011 15:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Svyatoslav! I would agree, but the argument against is known. Since it is assumed that this resource will use 95% of the "Dummies ", for which search alphabetically easier, because to do so.Although I, of course, would prefer to see exactly the order that corresponds to the modern concept of the taxonomy unit and then the site will be, on the one hand, to form a "Dummies ", and on the other - will not cause complaints from a qualified minority :)

15.03.2011 12:35, :

And I'm waiting for an update for the second week :-)))

15.03.2011 12:23, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

As suggestions: I think that the alphabetical order of bringing families and lower taxa is completely unacceptable, since the site claims to be a serious comprehensive resource. It would be necessary to place all right relationship from primitive to highly groups.

15.03.2011 12:19, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Denis, what plant did they feed on?

15.03.2011 11:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.03.2011 11:28, Peter Khramov:

Generally, yes, that's the idea. As for the shot location or date. As for naming a species, I'm not sure. Cause some photos illustrate species descriptions, so it's quite difficult to move easily a photo from one species to another without checking if it's illustration or not, and if new species is activated there...

15.03.2011 9:13, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

trifolii was uploaded nearby :)

15.03.2011 9:12, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Yes, sure, suasa! Thanks.

15.03.2011 9:10, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Petr, by the way, would be cool to give users possibility to change their own photos! You will be free of that and we will be able to update as soon as possible.

15.03.2011 7:16, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

15.03.2011 2:00, Peter Khramov:

Hey, Svyatoslav. Technical bug again?

15.03.2011 1:15, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, but all have been moved there. And podalirinus left, just left in inactive ...

15.03.2011 0:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Summing up: according to the actual info (Synev catalogue; Identifier or insects of Russian Far East), in Russia andetria lives. By the way, in Japan it doesn't (there pryeri lives, and basically pryeri is more southern species). Don't know if both species live somewhere sympatrically (generally can guess, yes). Have nothing more to add. :)

15.03.2011 0:09, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Good! I've asked just in case... :)

14.03.2011 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

And move it to Lacanobia suasa..

14.03.2011 21:28, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

14.03.2011 21:27, Peter Khramov:

Don't update, just noticing is enough. Moved.

14.03.2011 21:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Photo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/7435/ transferred to Iphiclides podalirius (Linnaeus, 1758). Type I. podalirinus (Oberthür, 1890) to leave - so too, but no photos. I'm afraid he is in such situations to change, and it will be like with Callophrys / Antigius.

14.03.2011 21:26, Peter Khramov:

A. Got it. Once again, in the admin show only ne_opublikovannye photos. Accordingly, it will pop up when be published ...

14.03.2011 20:34, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Sure, amandus! Uploaded at night, signed wrongly.

14.03.2011 20:33, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Yes, this butterfly is caught and checked by genitalia. No doubts.

14.03.2011 20:31, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

Yes, should be podalirius )) Typo. Where to update? Didn't find...

14.03.2011 19:41, Evgeny Komarov:

I can not - it is already gone from the admin area, and where to look for it now ... She was named for the author Russian Eltsizma Westwood - I gave her the Latin (already existing in the database).

14.03.2011 19:30, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, a reference to the Fautua let ...

14.03.2011 18:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! The genus has Elcysma view from the photo - E. westwoodi - I picture a few days ago deduced from "unattached ".

14.03.2011 18:06, Peter Khramov:

Activated cloud of new genera, species for which there infa countries (initially only activated species).

14.03.2011 15:18, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! For quite stupid again try to explain. If you removed the wound again Callophrys butlerovi Migranov, 1992, that I should return (paragraph 2) Antigius butleri (Fenton, [1882])? Return right Callophrys butlerovi Migranov, 1992 correcting misspelled names of species or the wrong Callophrys butleri Migranov, 1992 - Now in kind Callophrys no one nor the other.According to Paragraph 3 "create a new view - Antigius butleri with the corresponding author / year ". But he has already wound up !!! Sorry, but I understood nothing in the proposed algorithm!

14.03.2011 14:41, Peter Khramov:

So. First, the fact that now goes as Antigius butleri need to rename butlerovi and drag to the genus Callophrys, replacing, respectively, of the author and year. Ie in its place will Callophrys butlerovi Migranov, 1992 with improperly attached photo. Then you can start a new kind of Antigius butleri (because it has not), and transfer photos. Do not forget about synonyms even if it ...

14.03.2011 14:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! For quite stupid again try to explain. If you removed the wound again Callophrys butlerovi Migranov, 1992, that I should return (paragraph 2) Antigius butleri (Fenton, [1882])? Return right Callophrys butlerovi Migranov, 1992 correcting misspelled names of species or the wrong Callophrys butleri Migranov, 1992 - Now in kind Callophrys no one nor the other.According to Paragraph 3 "create a new view - Antigius butleri with the corresponding author / year ". But he has already wound up !!! Sorry, but I understood nothing in the proposed algorithm!

14.03.2011 13:25, Peter Khramov:

I got it. Actions should be the following:
1. The newly wound Callophrys butlerovi I deleted
2. The type, which now goes under Antigius butleri, need to return to the Callophrys butlerovi with the author / year
3. Adopt a new kind - Antigius butleri with the corresponding author / year
4. edit synonyms, where needed
5. After that, I move a photo to this new form.Once again, though a thousand altered form of the Old, is still to it should creep initial appearance and initial here obviously will Callophrys butlrovi Migranov, 1992 (even though it was a mistake). If you need to remove any comments, report.

14.03.2011 11:35, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

add more soon))

14.03.2011 6:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 14.03.2011 0:19
Peter! The history of these miracles is. The site kind of hung Callophrys butleri Migranov, 1992 (described from e.ch. Russia), while had to be Callophrys butlerovi Migranov, 1992. Next to it was attached a photo of Far Antigius butleri (Fenton, [1882]), which was not in database / directory. Further comments on the Eugene race has been led by the Karolinska Antigius, to whom transferred and photography.Next Anatoly Krupitsky finds that the author does not describe Migranov and Fenton. I correct author and simultaneously see that the spread of this species is not indicated. Show similar species name of taxon blues described Migranova (really Callophrys, but butlerovi) of e.ch. Russia and looking for some it right into the base (a photo of him as long as we do not have).During the first edits on the page Antigius butleri (Fenton, [1882]) appeared sinonimija = Callophrys butleri. (which is not true, because anywhere except our site, those species are not sinonimizirovalis and is the result of the above described "detective "). That somehow all. Currently, all (except for a synonym, and the spread Antigius butleri (Fenton, [1882]) is true.I removed synonymous, but the text part in the spread should remove someone who has access to it. Instead of "states and islands of the Soviet Union - the European part of the " should be the Russian Far East (the Amur region, Primorye), North. China, Korea, Japan.

14.03.2011 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Seems like typo in the species name.

14.03.2011 0:38, Peter Khramov:

A couple of days ago, Yandex has fulfilled the promise, to find today, though not all pages, but only 8670, but this is much better than it was before. Now Yandex full-text-search website will plow much more adequately, and people began to come over now.

14.03.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Svyatoslav, chose wrong name or?

14.03.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

Svyatoslav, comment, please...

14.03.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.03.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

Went to E. viridissima.

14.03.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

To go.

14.03.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Sum up?

14.03.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Hey, Svyatoslav. Any comment?

14.03.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

14.03.2011 0:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

14.03.2011 0:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain" then. New suggestions needed.

14.03.2011 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "uncertain".

14.03.2011 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Went to males.

14.03.2011 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

14.03.2011 0:27, Peter Khramov:

More suggestions? "Uncertain", "identified..."?

14.03.2011 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Fine. Moved and activated.

14.03.2011 0:26, Peter Khramov:

To go.

14.03.2011 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.03.2011 0:25, Peter Khramov:

Went to Caligula boisduvalii.

14.03.2011 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

14.03.2011 0:23, Peter Khramov:

As for the stupid comments - I ask specific examples in the studio, what I mean, then?
Westwoodi removed. Antheraea updated.

14.03.2011 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Do I understand correctly that kind of moved on to Callophrys butlerovi Antigius butleri wrong, and had to leave it as is, but to have a new kind of Antigius butleri? If so, then the form should be renamed back to Callophrys butlerovi, as well as a new kind of start Antigius butleri. I explained many times the logic.
If I understood correctly, signal, I will remove the newly wound Callophrys butlerovi, and you can all carry.And yet - Fota refers to Antigius butleri?

13.03.2011 22:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Here are lots of links to interesting Lepidoptera websites: http://tpittaway.tripod.com/silk/satlinks.htm.

13.03.2011 21:26, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.03.2011 19:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Eugene! Peter wait opinion on the situation of "Callophrys butleri ", because fixation movements from generation to generation in online synonyms - his request.

13.03.2011 17:59, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Oh, I finally realized what had happened and where did "Callophrys butleri " ...;) I fully support Eugene: all unnecessary removed from the site. I would "stupid " comments removed.

13.03.2011 12:12, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

13.03.2011 12:01, Evgeny Komarov:

The family Saturniidae entered incorrectly race Antherea! That's right - Antheraea! You can view the catalog, or Sineva here: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/list.dsml?searchPageURL=index.dsml&UserID=&UserName=&index=&recLimit=30&sort=SCIENTIFIC_NAME_on_card&SCIENTIFIC_NAME_on_cardqtype=starts+with&SCIENTIFIC_NAME_on_card=pernyi

13.03.2011 11:47, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.03.2011 11:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, in the genus Elcysma take away the incorrect view westwoodi a "tail ". I brought him a second right to "pull " photo of "non-attached ".

13.03.2011 11:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues As a result of confusion with Antigius butleri (Fenton, [1882]), which was recorded in the beginning as the Callophrys butleri (mixed with Callophrys butlerovi Migranov, 1992) formed idiotic synonymy: Antigius butleri (Fenton, [1882]) = Callophrys butleri (view does not exist and does not exist in nature). In my opinion, our mistake is not here to show commercials on the site. Peter wanted to be maintained and could see the history of the movements of species.But there is a clear nonsense. And now he also is a synonym when searching for old Callophrys. I have this "a synonym for " "killed ". Your opinion?

13.03.2011 10:35, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.03.2011 10:34, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.03.2011 10:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Gonodonta pyrgo (Cramer, 1777).

13.03.2011 10:29, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.03.2011 10:29, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.03.2011 10:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Apatelodes firmiana (Stoll, [1782]), imho, suits best.

13.03.2011 10:07, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.03.2011 10:07, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.03.2011 10:06, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.03.2011 10:06, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.03.2011 10:05, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.03.2011 10:03, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.03.2011 9:53, Evgeny Komarov:

? Citheronia hamifera, W.Rothschild, 1907. Species of this genus vary in color much.

13.03.2011 9:37, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.03.2011 9:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Letis occidua male (Linnaeus, 1758).

13.03.2011 9:24, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2011 20:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Melipotis januaris (Guenée, 1852).

12.03.2011 19:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Podalia dimidiata (Herrich-Schäffer,[1856]).

12.03.2011 19:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Neococytius cluentius (Cramer, [1776]).

12.03.2011 19:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mimallo amilia male (Cramer, 1780).

12.03.2011 19:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Melipotis januaris (Guenée, 1852).

12.03.2011 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Approved Evgeny's suggestion.

12.03.2011 19:06, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

12.03.2011 12:30, Peter Khramov:

Roman, as for commenting, what's wrong with seeing previous ones? You should see them on this very page. Or you mean something else?

12.03.2011 12:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.03.2011 12:27, Peter Khramov:

To go.

12.03.2011 12:26, Peter Khramov:

Ok, goes to "identified successfully".

12.03.2011 12:25, Peter Khramov:

Activated, though, I think I had previously been activated ...

12.03.2011 12:02, Andrey Ponomarev:

Hi, Petr. It turned out to be Helcystogramma lineolella.

12.03.2011 12:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Activate family Bombycidae - everything in it, ie, certain genus / species with photos!

12.03.2011 11:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Syngamia florella (Stoll, 1781).

12.03.2011 11:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Cyclopis caecutiens (Hübner, [1821]).

12.03.2011 9:00, Vladimir Mescheryakov:

I'm very sorry for butting in such serious talks, but we can see so far due to our standing on the shoulders of giants... and they considered (since 1909) that Neptis pryeri had few geographical subspecies such as Neptis pr. arboretorum Oberth.(China), Neptis pr. andetria Fruhst. (Japan, Primorye region), Neptis pr. pryeri Butl. (Japan, Primorye region), Neptis pr. koreana Esaki (Korea).… what is rather common for the species which varies and expanded so much included islands. Can't imagine that Neptis andetria got this marathon stick from Neptis pryeri. Either giants were not so gigantesque, or ... In actual Russian lists this species is mentioned as Neptis andetria Fruhstorfer, 1912 = pryeri auct., kusnezovi Kurentzov, 1949, in other references it's 1913. And it grows there on dropworts. It's very unhandy to make a comment not seeing previous ones.

12.03.2011 2:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyge opercularis (Smith, 1797), Megalopygidae.

12.03.2011 1:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Copaxa decrescens male, Walker, 1855.

12.03.2011 1:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eulepidotis viridissima (Bar, 1876).

12.03.2011 0:20, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. napi.

12.03.2011 0:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Why not (e. g.) britomartis? Checked it out?

12.03.2011 0:15, Eugene Karolinskiy:

I. podalirius! Some technical bug may have happened. And moved podalirinus to Sochi, omg. :)

12.03.2011 0:10, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. amandus.

12.03.2011 0:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lepasta grammodes (Felder, 1874).

11.03.2011 23:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Canodia difformis, Herrich-Schäffer, 1854.

11.03.2011 23:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Crinodes bellatrix, Stoll, [1780].

11.03.2011 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Edebessa bicolor (Möschler, 1883) Megalopygidae.

11.03.2011 22:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

How can it ever be Anarta trifolii? This one is Lacanobia. Svyatoslav, correct, please.

11.03.2011 21:03, Peter Khramov:

Thank Svyatoslav Knyazev, Constantine Krayevsky, Andrey Ponomarev, Evgeny and Alexei Fomin Azhipe.

11.03.2011 17:01, Peter Khramov:

Fixed.
Dmitry, recall that the headers are capitalized and voklitsatelnye signs in the amount of more than one piece of the web means a wild op.

11.03.2011 14:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry! Wrote a comment but in the morning forgot to send it :) I've got this butterfly to my collection and identified that at the end of the past century when there was no annulata at all :) So, I'm definitely not "upset".

11.03.2011 14:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In the classification, the genus is Eurytides prevyuha kind Prothesilaus. It is necessary to remove and insert real Eurytides 'a

11.03.2011 13:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.03.2011 13:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.03.2011 13:57, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

11.03.2011 13:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

11.03.2011 12:33, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, everything will be.

11.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

11.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Colobura annulata, Willmott, Constantini & Hall, 2001.

11.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

11.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

11.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Colobura annulata, Willmott, Constantini & Hall, 2001.

11.03.2011 5:50, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

11.03.2011 5:50, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

11.03.2011 5:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Hylesia teratex (Draudt, 1929). Alexandr is right!

11.03.2011 5:48, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

11.03.2011 5:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Male.

11.03.2011 5:44, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

11.03.2011 5:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Definitely need to be able to edit distribution. Commercials we political protest Narva :)

11.03.2011 2:18, Peter Khramov:

About the end of the last century. If there is a valid options - Wellcome. If you have something to correct in the details - make the system so that you can edit.

11.03.2011 1:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What century this information ??? I took ksantomelasa
Latvia, Lithuania, the Soviet Union - the European part Estoniya.- Th nonsense ???
Yugoslavia - such as incorrect

11.03.2011 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Thus, the country has made. Who will be the time - potestit like it, reviews will be of some use. Thus there is a separate item for each country - a skid / migrant - roughly the interim version, which says Eugene. The form for editing will update a little later - and then you can enter your data.And we ought to Russia out of the blue like a bear. Had his hands have ... Someone grill, that he has a familiar authors book - if it is not meganaglostyu, it would be good to ask them potyrili database in electronic form for export, even if only the very existence of the species in the country, without going into detail by region and so forth.Well, if so, with a detailed - if at all communism. Then the money can be authors for such a thing to pay, only, again, I do not know whether this proposal correct ...

11.03.2011 0:45, Peter Khramov:

For many species on the site appeared detailing the countries of Europe - where the fly, which fly as migrants or skidding, which can not fly. Accordingly, from the database to the directory moved thousands of species, and in the directory now has a selection not only in zoogeographic region, but also by country.Moreover, now even more urgent daw search in the catalog of species, for which there are illustrations, for now most types of illustrations in the catalog is not, but any additional information (although the same geography) necessarily there.

10.03.2011 22:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mistake! This is Colobura annulata!!! Evgeny, my congrats with this rarity. Hopefully, you're not upset.

10.03.2011 21:27, Peter Khramov:

Yury, would you get one more consult giving all this information to your consultant, to solve this question finally?

10.03.2011 20:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Two different species.

10.03.2011 19:32, Peter Khramov:

It is necessary that the first-pile thread like Wikipedia, but that is not sculpted did not picture the mood for some ...

10.03.2011 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, if everybody agrees, leave selene.

10.03.2011 19:29, Peter Khramov:

The very twin, not synonym?

10.03.2011 19:11, Peter Khramov:

On closer inspection, it turned out that did so, is there an intermediate option. In fact, the floor somewhat complicates the matter even a ...

10.03.2011 16:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Neptis andetria!!! Evgeny Karolinsky is right. Neptis pryeri is a twin species from China.

10.03.2011 13:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Please Semeykin to Yuri, duplicate their Russian names butterflies Latin. And in almost every Russian-language source of the name for the DV butterflies. Prokomentirujte what kinds you mean under such names: Kraeglazka Eastern, Chinese satyrinae, Forest motley satyrinae. On copper-butterfly I kind of guessed, and here ... :)

10.03.2011 12:12, Yuri Semejkin:

Got a consult. There is such answer. That's nothing but Neptis pryeri.

10.03.2011 11:29, Peter Khramov:

I think there should be similar to other formal features - ticks as yes or no, and in the notes - any comments on this subject at the level is not known, etc.

10.03.2011 3:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

F. rustica form.

10.03.2011 3:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

F. rustica form.

10.03.2011 2:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male, f. rustica form.

10.03.2011 2:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male.

10.03.2011 2:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male.

09.03.2011 20:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

"Shades " and the necessary corrections, meant to be entered by the user with the appropriate rights. :) The ability to edit the array is provided? And really, it is not always easy to answer the question of whether there is a view of the fauna of this area, "yes " or "no ".(From literary classics: "You stopped drinking brandy in the morning, answer - yes or no? ";))))

09.03.2011 19:37, Anatoliy Krupitskiy:

Costal margin spot seems to be not enough pearly for selene) Also doubtful is that it's sitting on Polygonum, cause selene usually prefers rather dry plants. Anyway, just looked at it again, think, it's selene still. Sorry for such a hassle)

09.03.2011 19:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter kindly cleaned in zygaenidae, introduced a new genus and species Elcysma westwoodi (Snellen van Vollenhoven), the author, as it slipped twice and therefore from the admin is probably not going away.

09.03.2011 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, as is known, there is no limit to perfection. We need an array of data - and then without any problems can be cramming and shades and something else. I now have an array of Europe (according to the principle is found / not found). You can also take an array of Russia out of the blue, but it will have to do with his hands.If someone else then there is - then it is very good, we also imports. And if you do not have - and shades take nowhere ...

09.03.2011 17:47, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Data for habitation will be "lives / does not dwell "? The dichotomy? IMHO, this is not enough, you have to be more subtle shades provide, if the site claims to be scientific. Which - to think / talk. At least I would have foreseen something like "doubtful to be confirmed " (do not pretend to refined wording).

09.03.2011 17:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO, selene. :)

09.03.2011 17:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO, euphrosyne.

09.03.2011 17:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, this also turns out to be Caligula boisduvalii if we take into account Yury's remark about no jonasii in Russian fauna. There is actually only this species in the Catalog, but also japonica, Moore, 1862. It looks absolutely not like japonica caterpillar which has light blue spots on its side segments, so I suggest therefore boisduvalii. Agree?

09.03.2011 16:58, Evgeny Komarov:

It's Caligula in the Catalogue, so let's consider it as a default, as we agreed before.

09.03.2011 12:21, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I corrected.

09.03.2011 6:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, look - at one of our beginners infa not displayed in "the author " - "Eugene Azhipa: Comments (6) "

09.03.2011 6:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, the local flooding we can to make the seed in a separate topic about which you have mentioned - the requirements for photographs, combined with the methods of the macro, where everyone could share the experience. While this information is very well represented on makroklube - can credit you can simply give.

09.03.2011 6:32, Evgeny Komarov:

Against such a "communism " are unlikely to be objections. Dmitry rights - would be the bones and meat narastet. A half-empty pages will stimulate the search for better ph than just names of species in the database! And the division of photos to make as it would be bad if the right to think for the future.

09.03.2011 2:59, Peter Khramov:

So "uncertain" still.

09.03.2011 2:59, Peter Khramov:

Approving what? ;--)

09.03.2011 2:58, Peter Khramov:

Approving euphrosyne or selene?

09.03.2011 1:18, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

09.03.2011 1:10, Eugene Karolinskiy:

If so, then it's just impossible to identify two of these to the species rather sure, I think.

09.03.2011 1:08, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

08.03.2011 20:09, Maxim Klepikov:

I don't know what is "the lower photo", but MY photo is definite selene. This one is rather well-worn.

08.03.2011 17:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

By and large, you can divide the photo and stir
-Photo in nature (male and female from the underside)
-kollektsionny instance (male and female from the underside)
-Photo tracks
-Photo pupa
-Photo eggs
- Photo biotope
-Photo genitals
+ Mapping and fodder plants

08.03.2011 17:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Where you will need to start all ravgo! If it looks and coun- already good. Over time, the meat will acquire

08.03.2011 17:31, Peter Khramov:

The people there are quite an important issue on which we would like to hear the views of each of you: soon I doleplyu system that can push information to several thousand species in the database, in which most European countries, these species live.Accordingly, it will be possible to mold a sample catalog by countries, not only zoogeo areas, and publish the data on the page that describes the types. In general, there will kommunizim. But! There will be a situation in which will be a lot of species (several thousand), which are now in the database, but which will infa countries.Now these types of I transfer to the catalog, but you tolerate thousands of species to the catalog, which as a description (at least initially) will be only the country and not be illustrations - I do not know. It seems to be, and must be (to the countries could effectively select, for example), and the like would be a lot of half-empty pages. Say what?

08.03.2011 16:54, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is possible glitch was when, for example, add a new sub-species to the inactive mind view is activated, and his family - not. Now I corrected, but some older types of phantom pain may remain. If someone else finds such things - reported.

08.03.2011 15:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

When entering through the section "" classification "not see species and genera Protographium Hypermnestra, although they are located by searching and work

08.03.2011 14:11, Yuri Semejkin:

As for "veggies". Mostly this is Mongolian Oak, rarely it's Quercus dentata.

08.03.2011 0:36, Yuri Semejkin:

Caligula jonasii is a Japanese species. We have none such. Seems to be same Caligula boisduvalii, before the first molting.

08.03.2011 0:04, Peter Khramov:

By the way, the lens he was like Sonya, if it did not confuse ...

07.03.2011 23:37, Peter Khramov:

Goes to P. apostatica.

07.03.2011 23:36, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, done.

07.03.2011 23:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved/activated.

07.03.2011 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.03.2011 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.03.2011 23:35, Peter Khramov:

To go.

07.03.2011 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Up to this point could be a problem where you extract the files - a glitch in the case, if ph expansion indicated in capital letters, ie not file.jpg, and file.JPG. Now fixed.

07.03.2011 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Vitaliy, I think most of the blame for the background, and compression of the diaphragm, not even light. And when the light - more help stem vspyha aside (and / or multiple sources) than lenses. Recently, too, the greatest bank, a useful thing. But I think that they do not need to pay attention in the first place.And at ISO 800 like a good idea I have behaved any EOS 550D ...

07.03.2011 21:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 17:00 07.03.2011 In many cases, modern matrices and stub can be not only without lens, but without vspyha ...

Without "vspyha " highly desirable but not always possible (not discussing cameras that do not make noise at ISO 800 and more - they have the price surpasses the limits of available middle photo). But with the macro flash and without the lens ...It depends on the terms of reference quality picture that you want to receive. Weight shots Vitaly Gumenyuk perfectly suitable for caller ID, but as a photographer killed in flash (but this is my view of the photo).

07.03.2011 19:41, Anatoliy Krupitskiy:

The lower photo is euphrosyne.

07.03.2011 19:40, Anatoliy Krupitskiy:

The lower photo is selene.

07.03.2011 17:00, Peter Khramov:

In many cases, modern matrices and stub can be not only without lens, but without vspyha ...

07.03.2011 15:42, Peter Khramov:

To access the kitchen garden and Boris Loboda Anatoliy Krupitsky. The latter, moreover, receives the standard editing rights.

07.03.2011 15:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

It's allright... :) pryeri is the previous (wrong) name of andetria. Look through Synev catalogue.

07.03.2011 13:08, Peter Khramov:

Hm, that's getting interesting...

07.03.2011 11:51, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

07.03.2011 11:50, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

07.03.2011 9:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Neptis pryeri.

06.03.2011 21:52, Peter Khramov:

Yury, your comment?

06.03.2011 21:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to c-aureum.

06.03.2011 21:50, Peter Khramov:

This is a good example of the futility of changing authors before species is published. Say, make changes only after publication, never before.

06.03.2011 11:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polygonia c-aureum is an author's definition, I added a photo to egea from my personal page at the very beginning. Should be moved back to c-aureum, author's definition. Thanks to Zhenya also.

06.03.2011 11:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polygonia c-aureum is an author's definition, I added a photo to egea from my personal page at the very beginning. Should be moved back to c-aureum, author's definition. Thanks to Zhenya also.

06.03.2011 2:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO Neptis andetria.

06.03.2011 2:23, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO Ussuriana michaelis.

06.03.2011 2:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Polygonia c-aureum.

06.03.2011 2:18, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Polygonia c-aureum.

06.03.2011 1:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pentobesa apostatica.

06.03.2011 1:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hemiceras poulsoni, Schaus, 1905.

06.03.2011 0:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Guess, Apela cataphaea, Forbes, 1939.

06.03.2011 0:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hapigia smerinthina, Schaus, 1928.

06.03.2011 0:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hapigia smerinthina, Schaus, 1928.

05.03.2011 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Idalus aleteria (Schaus, 1905).

05.03.2011 20:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Overdue. I've been already uploading subspecies photos, as you see.

05.03.2011 19:57, Peter Khramov:

Yes, about editing features: a point in the end do not need anywhere other than the field of forage plants. Not even something that is not needed, and harmful.

05.03.2011 19:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Mimoides xeniades due to the species synonimizing.

05.03.2011 19:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males. Actually, there is probably some need in a new engine to apply photos not only to species but subspecies too...

05.03.2011 19:47, Peter Khramov:

Citizens, you forget one thing. It is not only the ultimate information and change history and understanding of who is responsible for it. Zagrzil people Fautua and signed it "pink mouse." Hanging in his LK this mouse. Then you come to me, do you think that it's not pink mouse, and the gray whale. Published photos with the caption "gray whale."It may be correct, may be wrong, but where it came from - no clear picture author or other users.Therefore, it is important to do the work in stages, and it is important to tie foty initially to those species that are named by the authors (if it is not obvious nonsense, and if so - to translate into uncertainty), and then to look at the gallery and to confirm or deny, at the same time give its opinion and author - said he,whether it has a copy or it is determined by the book so the student-botany.
Also, do not forget that admin - negligibly small part of the photons. In the hundreds of times I publish the photos directly from the definition that the author did foty, and if there are errors, fix them in the admin on the general background is generally not noticeable.Summary: The quality of information on the site is important, and should seek to increase it, but not expense options when one changes everything it wants. Especially in a situation where we now have quite a lot - with the rights.
And from what appears on the website once the form, even in the database, not in the catalog - the quality of information is only a plus.And that ph was less ill-defined - need for a gallery to watch ...

05.03.2011 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus is much questionable and unclear. What should it be, Caligula, Rinaca (as it's now) or Saturnia??? http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Saturnia.htm.

05.03.2011 18:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

I already wrote that hurried to give explanations to Eugene. Not seeing the photo, there is the option to send them there. And he is wrong there some long long time. and will look at it and judge about the level of the site. Author name that does not solve. I have now entered into the database severoamerekanskuyu kosmopteregidu, though almost sure that there is a mistake. photo will go to the directory. and ...

05.03.2011 18:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male, arcturus subspecies.

05.03.2011 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, if approve, add and approve new species, please...

05.03.2011 17:38, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, the task of this stage - do not recognize the view of the photos and identify species that signed a photographer. If he had signed that something is not right, the picture is simply uncertain. But when I publish it, then you can consider and comment ...

05.03.2011 17:32, Evgeny Komarov:

"Alexander Zhakov 10:10 05.03.2011 " - So I do not see the picture! What he wrote. Ie have bad picture, but to make a decision about it, I can not - see picture 80 on page 80. About what you say, if I do not see, about whom we are?

05.03.2011 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, you see you have a photo with the caption Morpho. And nothing - you pass by, because this is not the name of the species. With fotami, captions which do not indicate the type, do not need to do anything.

05.03.2011 17:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes of Boris there are no questions asked!
And about the fact that the photos are not tied - sorry! Well, I see a photo "# 7285 Morpho. Constantine Krajewski " So what? I guess it's not Morpho and Caligo so what? I can not see a photo, maybe the truth Morpho?

05.03.2011 17:22, Eugenij Azhipa: This species is identified correctly.

05.03.2011 17:06, Eugenij Azhipa:

Caligula boisduvalii.

05.03.2011 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Publish pictures of Stanislav Korba, Dmitry Pozhogin, Semeykina Yuri and Andrey Ponomarev. The total number of pictures in the gallery passed through the 5000 mark.

05.03.2011 13:46, Peter Khramov:

In the admin has added the Old photos of the author.

05.03.2011 13:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Comments understood.
By Loboda, I missed the message. Man versatile (knowledge in different areas: the photo, Internet, entomology) :). Welcome.

05.03.2011 12:54, Peter Khramov:

Citizens Boris we run or not? Keep on the brakes, you need a yes or no. Only Basil is said. Who knows - Boris nickname barry on molbiole and makroklube (maybe because you are more familiar with it).

05.03.2011 12:41, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, Alexander is right - to determine the kind at this stage is not necessary, it was possible to do without the preview even hang, but I still made for a total certainty, that at least was clear about what it was about.Basil, next time in this situation simply throw off a message that is not posted there - I already have a form of comments by throwing to the kinds of ph and vice versa, the census is not needed.
Regarding # 7055 - I do not worry at this stage you need to create a look that was what tied Fautua.If then it turns out that the definition of wrong - so Fautua will move, and the view will be either in the base, or in a directory (remember that a directory is not necessarily the photo, it is enough, for example, features).By Lithosia - all pictures of this kind still unpublished, so when you have them there is added via the admin area, they are normally attached, but only to appear in the gallery after publication. Actually, because this binding and it is important - I can not publish them until such time as they are not tied to the species or sent to undefined.

05.03.2011 12:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

The admin is # 7055 Sorhagenia nimbosa, is a North American species. Probably Eugene rights, it is desirable to have information on the photo and the photo itself that lie there. And so will create a form, and this is a misnomer.

05.03.2011 10:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Somewhere gone all the images of a kind Lithosia, there was yesterday and I 2 from admin to pieces. 5 sent.?

05.03.2011 10:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eugene, where the problem is not in the definition of, and in mistakes in names, or where these pictures do not climb in the catalog and database. It is necessary to edit the name, and if the determination is not correct, in the usual way, on page photo, do not indicate the correct definition. :)

05.03.2011 9:42, Evgeny Komarov:

"Petr Khramov, 23:25 04.03.2011 " - Peter, all nice, but from these pictures I can see no more than a preview picture, but it is a damn sight. Trying to see the photo does nothing. How can I understand, what is depicted in the image of 80 by 80 pixels?

05.03.2011 9:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter pochikal my otyuda comments: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6492/ otkommentil not there yesterday. The description of the type of post it now.

05.03.2011 7:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Eilema sororculum corrected!

05.03.2011 2:05, Peter Khramov:

Activated.

05.03.2011 2:05, Peter Khramov:

Activated.

05.03.2011 2:04, Peter Khramov:

Validating earlier generations activated, view Euplocamus anthracinalis is now available everywhere.
If there is confidence that sororculum is correct - have the authority to rename Eugene and Dmitry, respectively, need to kick their comments through the form. Creating a new view based on the removal of the old in any case do not need!

05.03.2011 1:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

In view of Euplocamus anthracinalis, can be accessed only through the gallery. It is not in the catalog, or in the base. But through the gallery, you can go back.

05.03.2011 1:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Fix the specific name of authority is not enough :)

05.03.2011 1:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Question. There was a conflict of names. Eilema sororculum (Hufnagel, 1766), blue, Dubatolov.
Eilema sororcula Hufnagel, 1766. in the catalog and on http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=446927.
What to do in such cases? Types put on blue. page of the form to indicate the error? Self-correcting an error on the page? (I do not know if I have enough authority :)). Or create a new look and point to the pictures determination error.?

05.03.2011 0:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! And what about the native Baronia ???

05.03.2011 0:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

05.03.2011 0:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

04.03.2011 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Another additive for all users with editing rights: begin to form starting the admin page, which will gather the latest information from the site for editing and viewing.Now for Eugene and Dmitry there appear (as indeed earlier) genera and species for moderation, and what's new - this is something that all users with editing features of species are now on this page displays photos that have the signature of the names but to the species, they are not tied - typos, no species in the database, etc.Next to each fotoy there is a field where you can enter the name of an adequate, based on that gave the author. In general, it is not less important than the determination of ph but less napryazhno. Detailed description see. On http://lepidoptera.ru/amod/
ZY You can enter a name for any number of species at once.If there are any glitches / neponyatki - write in the subject line or mail.
Zzy Link to this page - with a cute heart item called "Admin" in the top menu of the user.Gradually, this page will make a full start, which blocks should be added to (for example, recent comments from the community, the latest updates, or something like that) - offer. To be able to go and take a battlefield at a glance.

04.03.2011 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Databased (being moderated now).

04.03.2011 22:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Boris starts. And the bear, I just kind of Episcepsis "pile " (which is another klagesi).

04.03.2011 22:08, Peter Khramov:

Yes, and more. Eugene, Dmitry, is on page statement species moderation do not go, I'm there a little smash it. Et briefly, all I remodeled - accomplish your goal.

04.03.2011 22:04, Peter Khramov:

The people who propose this garden is still run and Boris Loboda. You, as for anti-al?

04.03.2011 22:02, Peter Khramov:

Her. Essno infa stored in the database and pull it beneath anything is possible, including and under the table. I say do not fit the data table view in this case. For table given out to compare. A list of authors - it is primarily just a list, instead of TTX.

04.03.2011 22:00, Peter Khramov:

Rhode deleted, moved the family to the catalog and assigned foty where there was not.

04.03.2011 21:55, Boris Loboda:

Although ... you train them like normal sortiruesh ...

04.03.2011 21:53, Boris Loboda:

One line or what? In an array of them explode through a space drive.

04.03.2011 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Was no such species (just added).

04.03.2011 21:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

04.03.2011 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

I already wrote about this above Peter.

04.03.2011 21:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why semestva Megalopygidae Deuterogoniidae Mimallonidae
Aididae Agonoxenidae Bombycidae Castniidae Dalceridae no directory ??? Photos in them already

04.03.2011 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Tail birth "family Bombycidae ", and it is also in the database rather than in the directory.

04.03.2011 20:42, Peter Khramov:

Atanson! There were glitches with display of information, and users who have made Old in the signs (on the material worked). Now fixed. How will this add infu - pay attention next time, whether the signatures are adequate.

04.03.2011 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Aha, done.

04.03.2011 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Done.

04.03.2011 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, goes to "uncertain".

04.03.2011 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.03.2011 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Summary?

04.03.2011 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. lapitha.

04.03.2011 20:30, Peter Khramov:

To go.

04.03.2011 20:30, Peter Khramov:

There are 7 klagesi in the database, but no any Episcepsis...

04.03.2011 20:29, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

04.03.2011 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.03.2011 20:27, Evgeny Komarov:

About "You can live without lenses " - I'm sorry ... NOT!

04.03.2011 20:27, Peter Khramov:

To go.

04.03.2011 20:27, Peter Khramov:

Species wants to be databased.

04.03.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Not databased yet.

04.03.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.03.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Not databased yet.

04.03.2011 20:25, Peter Khramov:

To go.

04.03.2011 20:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.03.2011 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Goes to males.

04.03.2011 20:23, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, there was some technical bug. Corrected.

04.03.2011 20:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, well, to each his own :) As for lenses is not right - the left foot is (a bowl of instant noodles to eat from), and the effect of super. And Constantine, by the way (looking around exif) it removes the focus from the point - the problem is camera shake at slow shutter speeds away with under the regime "aperture priority ". Well, everybody put their pictures do not teach (although it would be desirable).

04.03.2011 20:23, Peter Khramov:

Okay, look. Pages have to do identity. Well, to scroll, of course, such a large page is not necessary. Believe juzverej immediately shake Home!)

04.03.2011 20:21, Peter Khramov:

Rat grain in it. But under the table here did not fit the data.

04.03.2011 20:16, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the only reference in the highly remote plans.

04.03.2011 20:16, Peter Khramov:

Up to 900 or 1100? I've been thinking how to push and ... Give them a thousand
As for the pictures - so any lenses, not in this case. For a start it would be nice to put a central focus point as the only active and focus on the eyes ... Before the lens - far. And by the way, it is possible to live without them.

04.03.2011 20:00, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

04.03.2011 19:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Boris! There's just a soap box with advanced shooting pyhoy without problems. Basically, as desired, "aperture priority " - hence the sometimes climbs shake because with all hands (this is ekzifam photo received from Constantine directly. I look forward to when the same appear on the site that I've seen.And when, finally, you can see the pictures on the site and at least 900 on the large (better to 1100 pixels).

04.03.2011 19:30, Boris Loboda:

It is clear - because there's just a line, there is no directory of authors?

04.03.2011 18:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No preview photo at the "Taxonomy" page (as if no species at all).

04.03.2011 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK, Peter. So I propustml this point. And the rest: synonyms, host plants, subspecies works fine (tested today).

04.03.2011 17:53, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I wrote then, whether in letters, then, whether the topic that the map on the home page will do later. All data is stored, but is not visible, yes. Soon all will be.

04.03.2011 17:48, Peter Khramov:

Boris, the addition of species and genera is available to any registered user, but they are activated immediately, but fall for moderation. Accordingly, the interface can look on the page or any kind of family.
ZY Then it became clear that not all options are taken into account brackets, will elaborate further.But the main and most frequent - and now plow.

04.03.2011 13:26, Boris Loboda:

Imho list of sponsors will look nicer sign, the division columns name / surname. And then in order by last name, and start with the name, with speakers will be easier to accept.

04.03.2011 12:56, Boris Loboda:

> DMC-TZ8
Well, sort of not so bulky device, you can easily fasten the diffuser on the flash. I really do not see what particular photo and that it was on the shooting modes ...

04.03.2011 12:53, Boris Loboda:

Peter - and the interface can look? Can I make temporary moderator - nothing I will not enter ...

04.03.2011 12:50, Evgeny Komarov:

"Boris Loboda, 04.03.2011 12:37 - Constantine - and what to shoot? "
And Constantine removes Panasonic DMC-TZ8 :)

04.03.2011 12:45, Boris Loboda:

Incidentally page numbers "Community " it is desirable to duplicate and at the end of the list (not just the top). You read from top to bottom - to go further on the trail. page - and the top of the page only, skrolliruesh ago ...

04.03.2011 12:43, Boris Loboda:

"All comments " and "Picture " - fast enough ...
"Guest / Blog / " and "Views " - should look ...

04.03.2011 12:38, Boris Loboda:

Peter - a timeout
set_time_limit (0);
to help ...

04.03.2011 12:37, Boris Loboda:

Constantine - and what to shoot?

04.03.2011 12:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I put down experimental time when you can meet a caterpillar and scope to the wine average revelers. On the main page of the form is not added reason?

04.03.2011 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Geography I put down to several types of them (the Neotropics).

04.03.2011 11:02, Peter Khramov:

People who have to put down the geography of Eurytides recently? Prog does not catch, right now corrected, but still need the Old hands Dovbakh about the author ...

04.03.2011 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Photo should be applied to this species.

04.03.2011 10:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male (crucial note).

04.03.2011 9:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This should be also moved to the species.

04.03.2011 9:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Photo should be applied to the species description.

04.03.2011 6:37, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

04.03.2011 6:37, Evgeny Komarov:

To "uncertain"!

04.03.2011 6:33, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.03.2011 6:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry! Decide yourself and move it to "uncertain"!

04.03.2011 6:26, Evgeny Komarov:

But there http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=15936.0&AUTHORqtype=starts+with&sort=GENUS&SUBTRIBEqtype=starts+with&YEARqtype=equals&GENUSqtype=starts+with&TRIBEqtype=starts+with&GENUS=Leucochromodes&SUBFAMILYqtype=starts+with&FAMILYqtype=starts+with&beginIndex=0&listPageURL=GenusList3%2edsml%3fAUTHORqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26sort%3dGENUS%26SUBTRIBEqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26YEARqtype%3dequals%26GENUSqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26TRIBEqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26GENUS%3dLeucochromodes%26SUBFAMILYqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26FAMILYqtype%3dstarts%2bwith&searchPageURL=index%2edsml%3fAUTHORqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26sort%3dGENUS%26SUBTRIBEqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26YEARqtype%3dequals%26GENUSqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26TRIBEqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26GENUS%3dLeucochromodes%26SUBFAMILYqtype%3dstarts%2bwith%26FAMILYqtype%3dstarts%2bwith this species belongs to Leucochromodes genus, Amsel, 1956, and there is some interesting note http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images9/leucor.htm, (Notes), and there is also Leucochromodes melusinalis, Walker 1859, http://gni.globalnames.org/data_sources/2?page=316&search_term=ns%3ALEU%2A.

04.03.2011 5:52, Evgeny Komarov:

In the morning, I have not yet woken up :( Peter! Take away the excess of the genus Bombycidae - kind of started to add, and shoved the page. Dobovleniya births resulting formed here is lapitha Druce, 1900 Druce, 1900

04.03.2011 5:47, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

04.03.2011 0:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well, if we all work hard, nearly always we get species finally. Maybe, 100% sure is not the species but genus at least.

04.03.2011 0:15, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, he added.

04.03.2011 0:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Also tend to like Leucochroma melusinalis more.

03.03.2011 23:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Lean to melusinalis.

03.03.2011 23:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lophocampa maroniensis Schaus, 1905?

03.03.2011 23:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Episcepsis klagesi, Rothschild, 1911.

03.03.2011 23:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Trichromia again, suggest Trichromia gaudialis (Schaus, 1905).

03.03.2011 23:34, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 23:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Family Bombycidae added! And what kind / type of nowhere ...

03.03.2011 23:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ordishia rutila.

03.03.2011 23:22, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree, Apatelodes lapitha mostly suits considering this series http://www.barcodinglife.com/views/taxbrowser.php?taxon=Apatelodes%20lapitha. But some series include few species, I guess.

03.03.2011 23:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Apatelodes lapitha also suits geographically.

03.03.2011 23:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ok then, Apatelodes lapitha.

03.03.2011 23:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Looked through all meant, can't see differences between this one and Apatelodes lapitha! Anyway, we can move it to "uncertain" due to the species varies so much and not so explored (can it be explored whatsoever?!!!)

03.03.2011 22:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

New species!

03.03.2011 22:54, Evgeny Komarov:

Also, no way for Apatelodes pandara: the line is straight! And all species have a big foretop spot.

03.03.2011 22:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, and Apatelodes dianita is in Bolivia.

03.03.2011 22:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, this is more similar, Apatelodes lapitha: http://www.barcodinglife.com/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=162366 (Guyane Française).

03.03.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, apatelodes dianita looks like this, http://www.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=162368. Plus Apatelodes pandara does also, http://www.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxon=Apatelodes pandaraDHJ01.

03.03.2011 22:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hm, new, newer and newest info. There is also Apatelodes dianita, http://www.barcodinglife.com/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=162368, don't know its expansion though. Anyway, no 100% hit.

03.03.2011 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Dried exotic and unseasoned neekzotika Davkaeva from Eugene, Alexander Zhakova, Yevgeny Komarov and Dmitry Pozhogin - only 75 new ph.

03.03.2011 20:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Checked out all genus, South African species, no anything similar. Apatelodes princeps or Apatelodes palma??? I think, this is Apatelodes palma yet. More opinions???

03.03.2011 20:08, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, we have two types of site with the name of Russian Scoop blueberry. This is the norm, or somewhere there is still a mistake?

03.03.2011 19:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Good, that we're already talking about family/genus! Anyway, don't approve genus. Palmi and Apatelodes torrefacta, well shown in web, have curvy bands on its forewings. Apatelodes princeps has close pattern, but other features don't suit: http://fr.treknature.com/gallery/South_America/Venezuela/photo196081.htm. Now can surely name only genus.

03.03.2011 19:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leucochroma melusinalis.

03.03.2011 19:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leucochroma corope.

03.03.2011 19:16, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 19:15, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 19:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Agree!

03.03.2011 19:11, Evgeny Komarov:

There's something I've seen already - Constantine sent a little bit. Finally there should be two types of Automeris with open rear wings. Super!

03.03.2011 19:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oospila tricamerata???

03.03.2011 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Synchlora gerularia.

03.03.2011 18:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems to me this is Apatelodes palma.

03.03.2011 18:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dolichomia resectalis.

03.03.2011 18:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Diaphania nitidalis.

03.03.2011 18:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Desmia ploralis.

03.03.2011 18:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 18:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Prenesta scyllalis.

03.03.2011 18:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oospila albicoma (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875).

03.03.2011 18:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Prenesta scyllalis, successfully identified.

03.03.2011 16:41, Peter Khramov:

Meanwhile, Constantine sent another hundred photons with Gainy, which certainly has become a favorite location of all and everything on this site: -))

03.03.2011 16:37, Peter Khramov:

Done.

03.03.2011 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

03.03.2011 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.03.2011 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.03.2011 16:35, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, new species activated.

03.03.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov:

To go.

03.03.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved to D. picta.

03.03.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to "identified succesfully".

03.03.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to "identified successfully".

03.03.2011 16:30, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved, new species activated.

03.03.2011 16:29, Peter Khramov:

Species wants to be databased...

03.03.2011 16:28, Peter Khramov:

To go.

03.03.2011 16:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.03.2011 16:27, Peter Khramov:

To go.

03.03.2011 16:27, Peter Khramov:

More suggestions?

03.03.2011 16:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.03.2011 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Also "uncertain".

03.03.2011 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved/activated.

03.03.2011 16:26, Peter Khramov:

Still "uncertain".

03.03.2011 16:24, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, to "uncertain" or?

03.03.2011 16:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

03.03.2011 16:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

03.03.2011 16:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

03.03.2011 16:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 16:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 16:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

03.03.2011 16:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

03.03.2011 11:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Maybe, will find something else!

03.03.2011 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems not.

03.03.2011 8:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems not.

03.03.2011 8:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 7:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Glyphodes sibillalis.

03.03.2011 6:49, Evgeny Komarov:

? Prenesta fenestrinalis - http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images9/prefen.htm.

03.03.2011 6:40, Evgeny Komarov:

? Prenesta scyllalis, Walker, 1859.

03.03.2011 6:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Prenesta scyllalis, Walker, 1859.

03.03.2011 6:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry, If I got it right, this is also Prenesta scyllalis, Walker, 1859.

03.03.2011 6:33, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

03.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 6:25, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

03.03.2011 6:24, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

03.03.2011 6:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Shots are nearly twins, is it needed to show both?

03.03.2011 6:16, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 6:16, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

03.03.2011 3:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

There is only one genus. That is right.

03.03.2011 1:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved, nearly double though.

03.03.2011 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Went to M. tharops male.

03.03.2011 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.03.2011 1:33, Peter Khramov:

To go.

03.03.2011 1:31, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen moderators, if approve, do the species, please...

03.03.2011 1:31, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

03.03.2011 0:31, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Th. lineola.

02.03.2011 23:29, Yuri Semejkin:

Niphonyx segregata. Identified by Matov. A. Yu.

02.03.2011 23:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Morpheis pyracmon, (Cramer, 1780)
Cossidae.

02.03.2011 23:13, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyge tharops male (Stoll, 1781).

02.03.2011 23:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Podalia orsilocha (Cramer, 1775).

02.03.2011 22:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eulepidotis ilirias (Cramer, 1776).

02.03.2011 22:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyge opercularis male (Smith, 1797). Megalopygidae.

02.03.2011 22:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mesoscia terminata, Schaus, 1905.

02.03.2011 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mesoscia terminata, Schaus, 1905.

02.03.2011 22:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mesoscia terminata, Schaus, 1905.

02.03.2011 22:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Draudtargia picta, (Schaus, 1904).

02.03.2011 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree. Do also, this one is a very interesting beast.

02.03.2011 22:00, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 21:58, Evgeny Komarov:

I agree with the interpretation of Dmitry!

02.03.2011 21:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ormetica sypilus, Cramer, 1777.

02.03.2011 21:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexandr! Seems even family is wrong. Actually, recently they tried to add Limoniidae to Brahmaeidae due to a new molecular analysis, http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=104358, but this one is surely something unclear. Also, no Brahmaeidae found yet in the New World: http://www.mothsofborneo.com/part-3/brahmaeidae/brahmaeidae.php, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmaeidae.

02.03.2011 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Therefore subgenus Neographium I think you need to drive in the race Eurytides

02.03.2011 21:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Petr Khramov, 18:38 02.03.2011

If you do all this, according to one source - accomplish your goal, with what. Or hodgepodge?
Again
Protographium, Protesilaus, Mimoides and Eurytides go anywhere as separate genera. The subgenus Neographium include race Protographium.Originally born Protographium include one Australian view Protographium leosthenes !!! Why North Americans are now all piled up in the Australian relatives do not know !!! Nothing about the 'Association yasnyayuschee these things, I could not find (I mean the literature)
In all North American sources
Mexico
http://www.nelsondobbs.com/Mexican_Butterflies.html
http://www.mariposasmexicanas.com/Bfly_Names.htm
Canada
http://www.cbif.gc.ca/spp_pages/butterflies/taxonomy_e.php
United States
http: //www.butterfliesandmoths.org / species_search
Butterflies of America
http://butterfliesofamerica.com/list.htm#PAPILIONIDAE

Nowhere kind Protographium does not appear, moreover, it even search engines like synonyms llja CA butterflies not found. Like this.

02.03.2011 21:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Draudtargia picta (Schaus, 1904).

02.03.2011 21:00, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rosema minor, Draudt, 1934.

02.03.2011 20:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brahmaeidae, but can't find at least one species in South America.

02.03.2011 20:05, Evgeny Komarov:

"Dmitry Pozhogin, 02-03-2011 17:39
Therefore, inaccurate opinion does not need a man. "

Dmitriy! Talk about "accuracy " determination Guyanese butterflies photo even specialists lepidopterist, but does not work on the fauna of the SA, to say the least, adventurous. On our definitions, based on the material presented in the internet, gamble more.I take to determine the beetle on a picture confident in the case of a good knowledge of the local fauna and its lack of species, outwardly indistinguishable. In the case of Guyana we are taking as a starting point in the existing network of information and, if seemingly little distinguishable species is not represented in the photo on the network, we proceed from the existing one.Therefore, accuracy of the photo in the taxonomic groups BM well understood and fully represented in the network somewhere else can somehow be valid. As little known and poorly presented - a lottery. This is the territory of the former Soviet Union, I support you 200% and even with these more stringent requirements. A tropical ...In 95% of certain shots today, I really sure, but within the limits specified above, t.e.imeyuscheysya (actually found) in the network information.

02.03.2011 20:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Mimallonidae, Aididae there is.

02.03.2011 19:54, Peter Khramov:

There should not. Can a couple of examples?

02.03.2011 19:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eulepidotis viridissima (Bar, 1876).

02.03.2011 19:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

From the catalog number of families took to the database, so it should be? Or something like that.

02.03.2011 19:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Bedosia fraterna (Schaus, 1905), Mimallonidae.

02.03.2011 19:33, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 19:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Ordishia rutila, Stoll, 1782.

02.03.2011 19:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eulepidotis viridissima (Bar, 1876).

02.03.2011 19:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Melipotis januaris (Guenée, 1852).

02.03.2011 19:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eulepidotis dominicata (Guenée, 1852).

02.03.2011 19:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved/activated.

02.03.2011 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Uncertain.

02.03.2011 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

02.03.2011 18:38, Peter Khramov:

If you do all this, according to one source - accomplish your goal, with what. Or hodgepodge?

02.03.2011 18:36, Peter Khramov:

Ugh. For inaccurate views need to drag them into accurate. And that they are inaccurate, then why not have one do? I do not understand...

02.03.2011 17:44, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 17:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Ormetica sypilus (Cramer, 1777).

02.03.2011 17:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Therefore, inaccurate opinion does not need a man.

02.03.2011 17:37, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, and where the contradiction that? We assure you divide foty certain exactly (although no-brainer that in many cases it is the most accurate is still not a 100%) and accurate (which is honestly written on the page and foty Gallery)?

02.03.2011 17:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Petr Khramov, 17:10 02.03.2011

proof to press him for anything, he can unsubscribe in the comments, or not sure. .
Do not be logical to do so if the definition is not accurate, then enter the base view, approve and transfer the photos to be inaccurate, or rather - to accurate.Starred Photos Gallery imprecise definition better than the pictures without any notes.

Peter called it amateurish and unprofessional.
If the site is meant as a set and let the fine, but wrong (inaccurate) certain gallery - is interesting to me personally.Sites with photo Full !!! The site should bear the entomological and not a photographic focus. We're already talking about it. End that we write, "beautiful butterfly, like African ". Main photo cool !!!

02.03.2011 17:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Stas This is not fumbles. I gave him a couple of barons genitals cook. Let him see.
I propose to make the following genera:
Protographium Munroe, 1961 with a view Protographium leosthenes
Protesilaus Swainson, [1832] - the white-tailed
Mimoides Brown, 1991 - Black paridesovidnye
Eurytides Hübner, [1821] with the subgenus Neographium = Eurytides Hübner, [1821] - the classic North American evritidy
I am waiting for reviews

02.03.2011 17:10, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, if the person identifies himself - the confirmation of his harvest for anything, he can unsubscribe in the comments, or not sure. Essno, in the case of uncertainty, a confirmation / refutation of another user desired. Ho.Do not be logical to do so if the definition is not accurate, then enter the base view, approve and transfer the photos to be inaccurate, or rather - to accurate. I think that the photo marked with the inaccurate determination of the gallery better than the picture without any marks.
A?

02.03.2011 16:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Prenesta scyllalis.

02.03.2011 16:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Prenesta scyllalis.

02.03.2011 16:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Glyphodes sibillalis.

02.03.2011 16:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Glyphodes sibillalis.

02.03.2011 16:16, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 16:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is a proposal on the definition of:
1. If you are 100% confident in pushing opredelenii- views submitted and approved (after making the database) or 2 times correctly defined views
2. If you are not sure opredelenii- waiting for confirmation of another person.

02.03.2011 16:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 15:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If somebody told me year ago that I would identify South African Crambidae, I would say "no way". So let's wait for colleagues' approvings, and I will add species after that. Don't want blunders but the very cool and pro website.

02.03.2011 15:20, Peter Khramov:

Eugene done.

02.03.2011 15:17, Peter Khramov:

Recently we expanded the rights of some users.Now:
Tatiana Gordeeva, Alexander Zhakov Yevgeny Komarov, Dmitry Pozhogin, Eugene Caroline, Vasiliy Feoktistov can edit Latin synonyms and variations of names, mostly Russian title more Russian names Distribution (zoogeo region), time of adult flight, time crawling caterpillars longer than the front wing .Wingspan, fodder plant subspecies.
In addition, Evgeny Komarov and Dmitry Pozhogin can edit the information on the main title of the form (together with the author / year) and his tribal affiliation.

02.03.2011 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Finally managed to block clone called obabochkah.info, thanks to the lawyer Alexei, without whose help it would not turn out quite could.

02.03.2011 15:07, Peter Khramov:

Add genus, please, will move to "uncertain"...

02.03.2011 15:06, Peter Khramov:

Photo leaves "undetermined".

02.03.2011 15:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. grammodes.

02.03.2011 15:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. odorata males.

02.03.2011 15:05, Peter Khramov:

To go.

02.03.2011 15:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.03.2011 15:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved/activated.

02.03.2011 15:03, Peter Khramov:

Ok, done.

02.03.2011 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to E. penelope.

02.03.2011 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Goes to.

02.03.2011 15:02, Peter Khramov:

To go.

02.03.2011 15:01, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to Amphimoea walkeri.

02.03.2011 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

02.03.2011 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved/activated.

02.03.2011 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, this one is should be databased too...

02.03.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Database, database it...

02.03.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved to A. albicans.

02.03.2011 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Guys, who commented this photo?

02.03.2011 14:56, Peter Khramov:

Moderators, if you agree with Evgeny, please, database a new species to make it possible to add Yury's photos to that.

02.03.2011 14:22, Eugenij Azhipa:

Caligula jonasii.

02.03.2011 14:21, Eugenij Azhipa:

Caligula jonasii.

02.03.2011 14:20, Eugenij Azhipa:

Caligula jonasii.

02.03.2011 14:19, Eugenij Azhipa:

This is a Caligula jonasii caterpillar.

02.03.2011 13:29, Peter Khramov:

Konstantin, I will try in the near future to write a short article on the subject, asking questions about the quality of regular ...
Eugene regards http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6964/ - yes, shake there, but the picture is so syurnaya that remove it by no means wanted: -)

02.03.2011 12:45, :

If Thera, then variata or britannica (no caught location)... (IMHO)

02.03.2011 12:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Syngamia florella (Stoll, 1781).

02.03.2011 12:10, Evgeny Komarov:

? Loxophlebia bisigna (Kaye, 1911), nothing more similar.

02.03.2011 11:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Amaxia lepida (Schaus, 1912).

02.03.2011 11:10, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Rather Thera variata...

02.03.2011 11:09, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 11:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 11:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 11:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 10:59, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 10:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 10:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry! I've got it in a tightly closed box, lazy to open. Shot that about five years ago (even rather scanned).

02.03.2011 10:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lepasta grammodes (Felder, 1874).

02.03.2011 10:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, and in the comments to the different types and you can specify that the systematic affiliation may be regarded as, and maybe some sort.

02.03.2011 10:13, Evgeny Komarov:

I too have not dug anything distinct about this, except that who and where are all detailed. In my favorite ground beetles also have a crusher-lovers, especially the French.
Dmitriy! Take their willful decision and will continue to work on it.

02.03.2011 7:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Konstantin! These difficulties, particularly when insufficient light and, T night under the light, well understood by anyone who removes macro insects! But marriage - he is married. I do not know that Peter I discarded, but something even missed. Here for example is http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6964/ - really shake "got out ", all the details are fuzzy.

02.03.2011 7:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Male.

02.03.2011 7:24, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 7:24, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 7:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Male.

02.03.2011 7:20, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 7:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Cyclopis caecutiens (Hübner, [1821]), Noctuidae.

02.03.2011 7:08, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 7:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Amaxia lepida (Schaus, 1912)

02.03.2011 6:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Eacles penelope (Cramer, 1775).

02.03.2011 6:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Citheronia hamifera, W.Rothschild, 1907.

02.03.2011 6:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Eacles penelope ♂ (Cramer, 1775).

02.03.2011 6:38, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 6:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Amphimoea walkeri (Boisduval, [1875]).

02.03.2011 6:33, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 6:32, Evgeny Komarov:

Manduca albiplaga (Walker, 1856).

02.03.2011 6:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Ascalapha odorata (Linnaeus,1758), worn-out female.

02.03.2011 6:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Ascalapha odorata (Linnaeus, 1758).

02.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 6:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Ascalapha odorata (Linnaeus, 1758).

02.03.2011 6:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! The genus Automeris (Saturniidae) remove views Automeris iberia (Cramer, 1780) (the wrong species) and remove the tail (author / year) in Automeris goodsoni Lemaire, 1966 Lemaire, 1966

02.03.2011 5:53, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

02.03.2011 5:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Automeris liberia (Cramer, 1780) 100% sure. Saw this one with expanded hind wings, shot by Konstantin. But not published there yet, maybe, stuck somewhere.

02.03.2011 3:54, Konstantin Kraevsky:

You can specify about "technically very good for nothing "?

In some cases, we have to shoot from a distance, of course, with the hands. On the stand here and speech can not be. And sometimes come across very small specimens, 2-3-4 mm. Again, it is difficult to catch a clear image of a hand, and then crop the image size will be small ...

02.03.2011 2:01, Peter Khramov:

Constantine sent one hundred and fifty new images; -)

02.03.2011 1:57, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, thanks for the note. Indeed, there is both the author and the year went on the species, subspecies and not on how it should be. Now I corrected, and now everything is OK.

02.03.2011 1:17, Peter Khramov:

And Stas what about this thought? Or do not you think?

02.03.2011 0:54, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

02.03.2011 0:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

In the column "the last update ", it turns out the author at the subspecies type, something is wrong here. Example: Hyles nicaea orientalis Prunner, 1798

02.03.2011 0:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Prenesta scyllalis, imho.

02.03.2011 0:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Diaphania costata ???

02.03.2011 0:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Probably, Artace albicans, Walker, 1855. This species fits more South America. To "uncertain".

01.03.2011 23:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Evgeny! Would you show the underside??? Wonder myself! Charaxes exploded my mind!

01.03.2011 23:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm curious to hear other opinions! In principle, split into clans clear to me already, but the question remains to Protographium and its subgenus Neographium. It confuses me the most. But the information I have never found

01.03.2011 22:56, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain" still.

01.03.2011 22:49, Peter Khramov: This species is identified correctly.

01.03.2011 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Ok, flashmob is flashmob...

01.03.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, after the emergence of the ability to download files over the people became even more photos to load. In general, now almost 700 ph await publication - at me to the fact that the request strongly not to take offense if they delay in laying out someone phot gallery ...

01.03.2011 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, I think that your opinion will be the key here. You yourself are inclined to something, to a simplified taxation Ali uslozhnenke?

01.03.2011 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

01.03.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov:

This one also went to males.

01.03.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov:

And this one is male.

01.03.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, male is male.

01.03.2011 21:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

01.03.2011 21:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male. Underside needed for 100% sure. Very similar also Charaxes bocqueti, Charaxes viola, Charaxes virilis, if this one is surely from Sierra Leone.

01.03.2011 20:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

01.03.2011 20:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male. First Charaxes I caught.

01.03.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

01.03.2011 20:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

01.03.2011 19:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry is right! I digged that and... Petr, move to Papilio heringi, Niepelt, 1924.

01.03.2011 19:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Look at http://swallowtails.net. Also you can compare it with my heringi. Got already ambrax uploaded but not published yet. Also, use Google.

01.03.2011 14:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

People! Let's look at childbirth Protesilaus, Eurytides, Protographium (with Neographium together) and Mimoides. How we make them here ??? Or will integrate all-still Protesilaus, Eurytides, Neographium ???

01.03.2011 12:04, Peter Khramov:

By the way, yes. A couple of notes: The genitive need for photo captions (the program itself does not know how it translated) - this may not be immediately noticeable and, in addition, the time crawling and scope is not displayed on the shared page with a description of the type, and later completed yet, and will be displayed. However, such data can be entered and now they will not go away ...

01.03.2011 1:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Checked on Hyles Hyles, everything worked very well. Even I understand why genitive write :). If you have any comments Report, I will consider.

01.03.2011 0:16, Peter Khramov:

Incidentally, there is a need to describe the general field was also edited?

28.02.2011 23:34, Peter Khramov:

Constantine, I removed a lot of files that were technically absolutely good for nothing. It is possible they were just 35. But the fact that the archive is not time to be processed completely - at wrong, it will be necessary to look in more detail. In the meantime, in order to avoid damage to the karma would be shipping 50 pieces at a time ...

28.02.2011 23:26, Konstantin Kraevsky:

When images are downloaded archive, the archive is not completely processed. First time filled 200+ images in one file, in the loaded display only 128. The remaining 104 picture again filled the archives, loaded hit only 68 of them. Of the first 128 deleted image 3, left 125. 125 + 68 = 193. At the stage of selection and processing shown in 158. It is not clear which fell 35 files ...

28.02.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Recently, the community homepage markedly slowed and could be loaded for half a minute. Now the situation is corrected, and the page should load ten times faster. If someone is not - inform ...

28.02.2011 22:14, Peter Khramov:

And even better - to accomplish your goal if it is not; -) I was glad to at least let poudivlyalsya))

28.02.2011 21:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Got. Read. There will be glitches - accomplish your goal!

28.02.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Good. Moved.

28.02.2011 18:02, Peter Khramov:

Lord, sent to everyone who was not against their involvement in editing, writing instruction. Please carefully read and unsubscribe or reply to this topic, which, they say, have received / read. Also, please reset the reviews for correct functioning of the system if there are any glitches.

28.02.2011 17:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Colias erate.

28.02.2011 11:48, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

28.02.2011 11:48, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

28.02.2011 11:48, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, are you sure?

28.02.2011 10:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, let it be like this then. As for differences between claudina subspecies and also other species, I fully agree.

28.02.2011 9:27, Evgeny Komarov:

? Jodis lactearia, Linnaeus, 1758.

28.02.2011 9:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Odezia atrata, Linnaeus, 1758.

28.02.2011 7:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Very FOR!

28.02.2011 7:12, Evgeny Komarov:

If Dmitry is sure... I got that right as it was named and with the set caught location. Can't say something more efficient!

28.02.2011 1:59, Peter Khramov:

To go.

28.02.2011 1:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.02.2011 1:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.02.2011 1:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

28.02.2011 1:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Aphantopus hyperantus (Linnaeus, 1758).

28.02.2011 1:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyponephele lycaon (Kuhn, 1774).

28.02.2011 1:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyponephele lycaon (Kuhn, 1774).

28.02.2011 1:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Xanthia icteritia (Hufnagel, 1766).

27.02.2011 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Including with no specific butterflies.

27.02.2011 22:38, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, stop teasing ;--)

27.02.2011 21:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Kidding???

27.02.2011 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, would you comment?

27.02.2011 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mistake. This one is Papilio heringi, Niepelt, 1924, from Halmahera island.

27.02.2011 13:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Looked through many pictures and can say that see no difference between these two species because they vary so much.

27.02.2011 12:26, Peter Khramov:

Since Dmitry online efforts, a large number of subspecies besides depending on the system, some subspecies are considered species, propose to introduce in the search (including auto-fit) and subtypes as well. What do you think?

27.02.2011 12:22, Peter Khramov:

Time to add one more identifying feature: the price of a dry butterfly...

27.02.2011 8:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry, aedon costs much more $ ;)
Will try to show underside, ok.

27.02.2011 4:51, Yuri Semejkin: This species is identified correctly.

27.02.2011 3:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Is it possible to look at the underside? Seems to be Agrias aedon.

26.02.2011 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

26.02.2011 21:31, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

26.02.2011 21:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Added!

26.02.2011 19:14, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the tip. Corrected.

26.02.2011 18:56, Andrey Ponomarev:

Press "description" link, no such species in the catalog.

26.02.2011 13:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pyralidae.

26.02.2011 13:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pyralidae.

26.02.2011 13:16, Sergey Novitckiy:

Yes. If doubtful, then "uncertain"!

26.02.2011 13:02, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain", maybe?

26.02.2011 13:01, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, new species needed (to add and approve).

26.02.2011 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

26.02.2011 10:27, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Thanks for identifying.

26.02.2011 8:57, Tatyana Gordeeva:

No, Hydrelia sylvata.

26.02.2011 8:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

26.02.2011 8:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

26.02.2011 7:46, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

26.02.2011 7:44, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Give up, let it be like you said. Anyway, we can't boil photo. Prout (1912) described also "transitional" species, after that Sc.t.proutiana was described.

26.02.2011 3:08, Peter Khramov:

Today, Yandex reported from the filter removed finally. Eighteen months gimorroya ...

25.02.2011 21:53, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

25.02.2011 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Aethes triangulana, Treitschke 1835.

25.02.2011 21:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Aethes triangulana, Treitschke 1835.

25.02.2011 18:14, Peter Khramov:

Ok, thank you, will ask if there are difficulties.

25.02.2011 18:12, Peter Khramov:

With molbiolom - yes even if in search results messages juzverej be issued and pictures could be the ones to look for messages that have foty. Cool would help. But no ...
By Makroidu I suggest the following:
1. Survey on Makroide - who do not mind
2. The sample data from the database of authors (who do not mind) and system (butterfly)
3.Files eksportnut stupid to archive
4. Data from base fotam eksportnut for imorta in MySQL.
Actually, like all.

25.02.2011 18:08, Peter Khramov:

Meh, as it's named...

25.02.2011 17:49, Peter Khramov:

The Hound of the Baskervilles.

25.02.2011 17:44, Andrey Ponomarev:

Epinotia Trigonella
(Linnaeus, 1758)
http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?bf=1151.

25.02.2011 17:24, Boris Loboda:

Well, if I look hard, I have been working with databases for a long time.
Perhaps you have there some union. Check to start the individual sub-queries by topic, news, commentaries - that inhibits the most ...

25.02.2011 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Chewbacca...

25.02.2011 17:19, Boris Loboda:

Yes, I would like to do a large part of the response is not working. Wrap there with Plantarium works, just to handle another request, and other information to give. With your hand probably will have to work longer, if such has not been done. Ie We can start with a small number of authors who do not mind, and then we'll see ...By the way of a good (not too much to pull the authors) can be here in the profile to make some type of fad 'Export your photos with macroid.ru ", somewhere near the loading ...

Well, with molbiolom - in principle, there is not particularly draw on a range of information out there in the forum simple priattacheno without any systematics.Species, place and date - only in the text, and then - do not explicitly and not always. One can only picture and the author except to take.
And once Bolivar opposed to some kind of introduction, the method is still there - you can read pages offline stupid, disassemble html, look for pictures in your code (html and there on the peg of the author is clear) - and take ...Of course, with the support from the other side everything would be much easier and more efficient ... but if not, then not.
I've done similar to "Butterflies Crimea " - Thumbnail index (of course in consultation with Savchuk).
http://barry.fotopage.ru/bk/
http://barry.fotopage.ru/bk/index.php?family=144&thumb=1

25.02.2011 17:12, Peter Khramov:

Red cheeks.

25.02.2011 16:54, Peter Khramov:

New arrivals in the gallery.

25.02.2011 16:52, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there is such a thing. There's everything from the very beginning was not very fast, but now it became very ill. All because of the fact that the questions is not very banal - is the collection of all the latest messages, news of comments, etc. I will try to optimize.

25.02.2011 16:51, Peter Khramov:

Boris, I molbiole asked Bolivar to do a survey of people - say, who do not mind if their photos were used on the site. List of going bad, but what about interefeysa and imports - as I understood from the words of Bolivar, no chance.
Maybe this is also on makroide oprosik do? Collect the views of the people who do not mind, and then we export ...What do you think?

25.02.2011 15:40, Boris Loboda:

Link "community " I opened for a long time (about half a minute) ... Who what?
Maybe it is worth thinking about the optimization, the key base can not have enough information yet ... It seems very little, but what will happen next ... Peter, if there is a sense - and I base queries can look, if that ...

25.02.2011 15:40, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Phrudocentra, looks like pupillata, spotted though...

25.02.2011 15:29, Boris Loboda:

Well active authors are not so much, I think they are still active light at all three sites and will not be against.
And about molbiola - I already some time ago, talked about streamlining the administration of forum photo gallery of some base, some hierarchical structure (by taxon). How many pictures in the themes, by definition, in the "Images of insects " ...It's much easier to work, and in a consistent forum because you will not find anything. And they're kind of like not fundamentally opposed, and agreed that a good idea ... but no matter how I tried to move to some practical steps and offered his help - it never moved ...In general, about the import interface, I think, will be similar to Plantarium, the system "request-response ".

25.02.2011 15:27, Peter Khramov:

To go.

25.02.2011 15:25, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Probably, Venusia cambrica, Curtis, 1839.

25.02.2011 15:09, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Horisme vitalbata D.et S.

25.02.2011 15:06, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Calcaritis pallida, Hedemann, 1881.

25.02.2011 13:49, Sergey Novitckiy:

This was shot 2008/06/08 13:34 in Odessa region, Belyavsky hood, in the outskirts of Gradenicy village, in a godforsaken basin overrun with ruderals. According to the List of Geometridae of Ukraine (Kostyuk, 2004), both immorata and tessellaria can be in steppe areas. There: http://babochki-kryma.narod.ru/0_Geometridae/Scopula_immorata.htm and ttp://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?Home.htm you can see pictures very similar to mine.

25.02.2011 13:12, Peter Khramov:

Since other views have been received, the genus Rhymnaria removed.

25.02.2011 13:05, Peter Khramov:

Dear gentlemen moderators, please, add species and genus, to move this one to "uncertain"...

25.02.2011 13:04, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, you're on!

25.02.2011 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

25.02.2011 12:30, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Archiearis notha Hb.

25.02.2011 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

25.02.2011 9:56, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Not Entephria at all. Can be the same Electrophaes corylata.

25.02.2011 9:41, Tatyana Gordeeva:

The pattern contrasts too much in comparison to immorata which has white only submarginal band and the rest is all dusted with grey (especially the root), and discal spots are hardly seen. Sooner spotty tessellaria with a light basal field and clear disks. Better to know the caught location... Sc. immorata is a temperant Eurosiberian species expanded from the forest steppe to the low-latitude taiga, from Europe to Siberia and Priamurye Region. And Sc.tessellaria is a "south" steppe species expanded from Mediterranean region to South Ural and Issyk Kul region.

25.02.2011 8:47, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Pero polygonaria (Herrich-Schäffer, 1855).

25.02.2011 8:24, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Eois, probably, tegularia Guenée, 1858...

25.02.2011 2:20, Peter Khramov:

Boris, I'm about the same thing. If Makroida can organize such exports - it's nice. And as the authors - that they were grateful for the beginning it is necessary that they all be published on this website have the desire. Because I talked about and cry of.As molbiola, there is no automation and no not expected, even comments by the presence of photons can not be selected (according to data from the Bolivar). So it will have to handle all the handles.

25.02.2011 1:48, Boris Loboda:

As for imports:
Of course it should be supported by donating to the site (to give necessary data on request). There is a view that we give not only the image but also the related information (eg taxon, location, date, author ...). Plus makroide to have massive operations marked icons. IeWe mark the desired pictures - generates a list of url to return a list of relevant images with all the associated information. Insert here - the list is expanded and come to the right place fit authors to filming locations and dates - nothing to edit and verify it is not necessary. I'm here about what ...Knowing what you need on site - you yourself can do it with huge bunches rather quickly, the authors are grateful to you only. :)

I have already worked between my site and makroidom.

25.02.2011 1:15, Peter Khramov:

Pure love of tediousness.
If we take a file directly from another site:
Poke 1. Right-click on the file, select Properties, copy the URL of the file
2. In the upload form to insert the URL
If you take from another website by copying to your computer:
1.Poke right-click on the file, choose to save (to use add-ons to the browser, you can simply drop the file sharknut - strongli rekomedned - much more convenient right-click to open the non-active links, by the way, too)
2. In the form of load select the desired file
A?..

24.02.2011 21:56, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

24.02.2011 20:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Noo! Helena can be only in Philippines. Means, 100% Troides rhadamantus, female.

24.02.2011 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, this was shot in "The house of butterflies", Nizhny Novgorod. What did they have? As far as I can remember, they had no rhadamantus but helena. Shot about two years ago.

24.02.2011 19:40, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

24.02.2011 18:45, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, this is just a guesswork. :) Is there any point to compare their stripes if we're not sure that its some diagnostic feature? We should have a look at their genitalia... :) One pro for lutea is that (as I found) adusta was found only on the very edge of the southern Primorye (Hasansky hood). "Veggies" are also interesting question as for these butterflies. This can be a good clue to identify!

24.02.2011 18:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is not Troides helena!!! Most probably TROIDES RHADAMANTUS female.

24.02.2011 18:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! With regards to the download sites. On makroide cry forest. And what about the other sites following. With regards to me - I try not to load doubles, and photos of species that are not represented on the site. If the ship, if it seems to me that the quality is better (for doubles understand a similar view, nothing is added to identify the species).I think that many will also assume similar positions (well, why in 1001 a picture of Icarus?). Well, not so much for each individual photo images that are not on site. Therefore, 5-10 download images from the site is easier than copying them out again to load. Well, let it be a boot option!

24.02.2011 18:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! With regards to the download sites. On makroide cry forest. And what about the other sites following. With regards to me - I try not to load doubles, and photos of species that are not represented on the site. If the ship, if it seems to me that the quality is better (for doubles understand a similar view, nothing is added to identify the species).I think that many will also assume similar positions (well, why in 1001 a picture of Icarus?). Well, not so much for each individual photo images that are not on site. Therefore, 5-10 download images from the site is easier than copying them out again to load. Well, let it be a boot option!

24.02.2011 17:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I tried to download the file from the two images. Preview add to the base types (they were not). I download the archive. The program is unpacked and identified uvse itself (distributed on busy only just types). All my ideal. Rather, Svyatoslav own problems.

24.02.2011 17:19, Peter Khramov:

By loading the packet: the people, try one thread as a test throw arhivchik any. A strange situation turns out - I archive Svyatoslav normally ship, and he does not.
On loading from URLs: Makroida regards - no problem, let's obgovrim details, so you can import.Only whether it will be in demand by the people? This is necessary for most Makroidu let cry. Empty? Kasem sites in general: if there is a view of the same variant that, for example, on forums, ie we introduce the address of the image type http://www.megasait.ru/kartinko/v3348454.jpg, and it swings out, it really is so convenient to upload a lot of pictures? It is more convenient to fill up on their computer and then pour in the archive, is not it? If the meaning of some automatic import, it is then no longer dependent on the resource from which to take, for example, from the same Makroida ...

24.02.2011 16:46, Evgeny Komarov:

Keep Boris, though I have this problem should not be - perhaps all shipping cost here, I am currently loaded. But others, who have plenty of pictures on other sites (makroid, molbiol) is to try to make life easier.

24.02.2011 15:07, Boris Loboda:

It is not a pair of triple-files. Many in fact already loaded somewhere and got literally thousands (eg Gumenyuk Komarov I). By the way, and imports from the same makroida not be put. I am personally a second time to repeat the feat ... have neither the time nor the desire, everything is on makroide and even more on my website.

24.02.2011 15:00, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny Karolinsky's comment is moved from the species photo page to the description one. I'd like to pay attention once more to that: on the species photo page you may discuss the very shot, is it good or not, what species is on it. But the species features, e. g. its taxonomic status, is possible to discuss only at the species description page. Also, being at the species photo page you can press the "description" link to go to the description page, and vise versa, so please, comment photos and descriptions at fit pages.

24.02.2011 14:29, Peter Khramov:

Boris boot url 'and not, as site, unlike many forums / blogs, is designed for users to download only the personal photos that, accordingly, if they have computers.In that rare case when a couple of the photos will be found at any site, than on the computer, nothing prevents copy them to a computer and download from there.
Svyatoslav now checked again, I have all the normal boot.Please spend a little test: make a small archive of all nesokolkih photos and try to download it.If you still will not boot - see if the message on successful download or nothing at all will not be upgraded if at least a page and send me this little test archive to the post, I will try to upload it for its purity of the experiment.Supplement for all: the downloaded images on the page now shows the name of the file (as it was on your computer) - this will help, for example, when you link a photo to view the file name, but the program will automatically do it has failed.

24.02.2011 11:43, Svyatoslav Knyazev:

something does not work the download archive. the file is downloaded, and then nothing happens ...

24.02.2011 10:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, I, too, everything is loaded, Thank you.

24.02.2011 10:45, :

Yep :) Then the second shot, #6384 is not J. lutea but J. adusta! Colleagues, please, compare a white stripes pattern at the lower part of the hind wings, there: http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Japonica_adusta.htm and http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Japonica_lutea.htm. And also our photos. Anyway, it's surely silly to do that having one butterfly of every species.

24.02.2011 9:36, Boris Loboda:

A loading pictures on the url work?

24.02.2011 9:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Yep :) Then the second shot, #6384 is not J. lutea but J. adusta! Colleagues, please, compare a white stripes pattern at the lower part of the hind wings, there: http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Japonica_adusta.htm and http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Japonica_lutea.htm. And also our photos. Anyway, it's surely silly to do that having one butterfly of every species.

24.02.2011 8:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr, thanks! :)
If we compare these photos, then this is the very Japonica adusta (Riley, 1939)!

24.02.2011 0:48, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, you're somehow overdramatizing things. You can see its underside there, for instance: http://szmn.sbras.ru/old/picts/butterfly/Lycaenidae/Japonica_adusta.htm.

24.02.2011 0:39, Peter Khramov:

So, at the request of the workers are now pictures can be shipped only one, but a bunch at once - in zip-archive. Program site automatically unzip the file, and you will only need to make the necessary data razedele downloaded images on the site.In addition, now when downloading pictures one by one and at loading the heap ph in the archive for each photo file the program tries to find the form in the database and, if found, you do not need to enter anything in the appropriate field, the program itself will tie Fautua to mind.To her it is necessary to call to get the file does not somehow, and using the basic Latin name used on the site, as the first two words (case does not matter). For example, papilio machaon.jpg or parnassius apollo etc.jpg.
Maximum file upload size: to odinchnyh photos - 5 MB for the files - 50MB.I beg those who will use the new features, reviews unsubscribe here or email me - everything is OK.

24.02.2011 0:34, Peter Khramov:

Who tried - everything is OK. Recently, a system of rules, adding the ability to batch upload photos in the archive and auto-detect the type of the file name, possibly at the time was a failure.

23.02.2011 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

With uploading the picture is not set the date of catch / photo.

23.02.2011 21:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Poorly, adusta is shown in web so bad (found only this): http://molbiol.ru/forums/lofiversion/index.php/t184005.html.

23.02.2011 20:44, Peter Khramov:

Activate.

23.02.2011 19:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Family Sematuridae Activate - forget about it!

23.02.2011 18:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Hm... Don't know. Thought, this depends on color rendering. Maybe this is some individual feature. I have never been in the Primorye region and never seen this butterfly alive, so let's residents say something. :) Also this is harder, because there is J. adusta (another name is onoi) in the very South Primorye. Their appearances differ rather slightly. Anyway, they feed on different plants, so lutea feeds on Q. mongolicus and adusta does on Q. dentata. What veggies do you have then? :)

23.02.2011 16:40, Peter Khramov:

Vitali, the catalog - the types and in the gallery - photography. I think you are a little confusing variety of choice for both. Sort by year in the directory - sorting, the description of the type, for example, Linnaeus ... And for months - in the same directory have selected.Indication of hours and minutes (for the photo?) Optional, and giving - giving information about the time of the activity (or ne_aktivnosti) species during the day, for example.

23.02.2011 15:37, :

And why sorting by years? That sort by month (and days), probably more interesting and progmatichna - gives an idea of ​​the time of summer.
By the way, which gives an indication of hours and minutes?

23.02.2011 14:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is the same species on two shots, there were comments and I kept it up. Small notice: this species is not mentioned for Guyana. If we have a look at the series of the photos of this species, we can clearly see its color varies. www.boldsystems.org/ views/taxbrowser.php?taxi... They can be at the shot location with a little bit lighter wings and darker cephalothorax. Hind wings will not help.

23.02.2011 14:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! Alexandr may be right. If Konstantin adds some more photos, that will be good to verify it once more, especially such that are "No comments".

23.02.2011 14:10, Evgeny Komarov:

OK!

23.02.2011 14:10, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

23.02.2011 13:57, Peter Khramov:

Now the species in the catalog can be sorted by year and more. At the same time it was further introduced to all kinds of information in the directory, which until now has not been affixed year.
ZY Range chronicles butterflies on the site at the time of publication of the news - from 1758 to 1995.

23.02.2011 13:29, Peter Khramov:

Vitali is not entirely true. In many species have brown / brown and gray. And nothing more. That's such - yes, a lot of options. In the first place they will have up to 25 kinds of crop. But the more complete set of colors and the unusual colors (eg, green), the better the system works.This, by itself, the color of it is not necessary to count on a sure sign to determine, but the help it can provide in the definition as well. While I, for example, do not use this feature to determine.

23.02.2011 13:22, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, I looked at the original shot and noticed that it's somehow shadowy and even after some retouching the butterfly's hair is still black. If we enlighten it a little bit more, we can see it's colored brown, but this photo sucks. To get normal color balance it should be seriously retouched, that can be difficult considering how many shots are published daily on the website. Also there we can see brown color http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/6232/, even though these are two different butterflies, it can be the same species nevertheless. Sum up: the hair is brown.

23.02.2011 13:14, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, Russian systematics here despite the fact that you yourself write "in Russian systematics that not accepted."
In the case of: well, let's not look at Russian / non-Russian. Let's just have to approve:
Russian species / genera default are taken out of the blue.European family / subfamily and species / genera in their absence in blue are taken from faunaeur.org.
Riodinidae fauna - separate family, so I moved it here alone. And, for example, satire - not. Therefore it is not moved.
ZY If Riodinidae refers to something else besides Hamearis - reportedly also transferred. In the meantime, there is only one this kind.

23.02.2011 10:55, :

Something seems to me that this section does not work - a lot of noise, probably due to the fact that there is virtually butterflies Most of the entire set of colors

23.02.2011 10:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Questionable ssp. suellus, Staudinger, 1878: some authors move it to porcellus synonyms, others (e. g., Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia, 2008) consider it as a species itself. Also, the Catalogue says that suellus is expanded in Siberia (Baikal region), so it's a question who can be in Astrakhan region then.

23.02.2011 9:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 22:39 22.02.2011
"As far as I remember, no one objected to send Russian systematics much away - with regard to the level of families / subfamilies. But at the level of genera / species - bow catalog blue. Huh? "
And where does the only Russian systematics? Sem. Riodinidae yourself here http://www.nhm.ac.uk / research-curation / research / projects / butmoth / - this resource can also be a serious trust. It is similar, too http://193.166.3.2/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/riodinidae/index.html

23.02.2011 8:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexandr! I asked Konstantin for large size photos of questionable Saturnias (these also) to show it to some American expert in American Saturnias. Maybe, that will clear up the situation. Hylesia teratex is doubtful. This is male, and all males of this species, as we can see on other shots, have brown pubescense, not dark black as this one has. Meh, Konstantin should have had possibility to shoot that with hind wings expanded :)

23.02.2011 5:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

faunaeur.org/ Celypha lacunana (Denis & Schiffermuller 1775)
Sinev - Syricoris lacunana (Denis & Schiffermuller 1775)
Childbirth is very close, in the same tribe.

23.02.2011 5:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cydia triangulella in faunaeur.org/ not at all,
The blue from all over Russia, including the European part.

23.02.2011 4:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Acleris ferrugana (Denis & Schiffermuller 1775) had 8 synonyms from Aphelia other kind Aphelia (Zelotherses) ferugana (Hubner 1793).

23.02.2011 4:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

In Russia, only for the Sineva Dichrorampha gueneeana Obraztsov 1953
http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=439259: Dichrorampha vancouverana McDunnough 1935 = gueneeana Obraztsov 1953

23.02.2011 4:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, this is Hylesia teratex (Draudt, 1929), though butterflies are a little bit lighter on the photo, didn't find something more anyway.

23.02.2011 4:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hylesia teratex (Draudt, 1929).

23.02.2011 3:11, Yuri Semejkin:

Hi there! Want to ask experts. Please, explain, if possible, why this Japonica lutea is colored in such a way? In past three years I met only two Japonica lutea of such color. Common color is like on #6384 shot. Yury.

23.02.2011 2:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mistake. This one is Papilio heringi, Niepelt, 1924, from Halmahera island.

23.02.2011 1:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved to J. lutea.

23.02.2011 1:27, Peter Khramov:

Yury, is there any underside photo, maybe?

23.02.2011 1:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

As for today info, there is no adippe in Primorye region now (but closer species). Anyway, this butterfly is not adippe's relative. The more I look at it, the more I see ruslana.

23.02.2011 0:59, Yuri Semejkin:

Hey ho! I think, identifying is wrong. It was identified for me as Fabriciana adippe.

23.02.2011 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not argiolus since it's Primorye region. Can't surely name the species. :)

23.02.2011 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not argiolus since it's Primorye region. Can't surely name the species. :)

23.02.2011 0:42, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not argiolus since it's Primorye region. Can't surely name the species. :)

23.02.2011 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO, Japonica lutea.

23.02.2011 0:32, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

23.02.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov:

If approve, to the database then...

23.02.2011 0:21, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Imho, that's the very Argynnis ruslana, male. Definitely not paphia (it has different androconiae, etc.)

22.02.2011 23:37, Peter Khramov:

Now, if the number of species of the same set of colors as that of the considered too large to be displayed only 25 of them (sluchayy selection).

22.02.2011 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Terminator!

22.02.2011 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Just a little bit, and the site will be 5,000 images ...

22.02.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov:

People, please clarify the situation with the following types: Aphelia ferrugana, Cydia triangulella, Dichrorampha vancouverana, Syricoris lacunana - whether in the database have their analogues, or not. Again accumulated new foty for which there is no species for the time being ...

22.02.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov:

As I recall, no one objected to send Russian systematics much away - with regard to the level of families / subfamilies. But at the level of genera / species - bow catalog blue. A?

22.02.2011 19:33, Evgeny Komarov:

And to bring the system to the directory, let's select the family finally Riodinidae of blues as an independent. This is not good, that it is in copper-butterfly. The Russian systematics that not accepted.

22.02.2011 19:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, if it is not more difficult than periodically clean the schools here are ... watch, but sometimes in a hurry, and instead of "cut " harvest "copy " and then went on without looking ...It is not necessary, perhaps to bother, but if you make a primitive that, in this field can not be input to the space, and in this case, the program sends introducing such crap to hell ...

22.02.2011 18:59, Peter Khramov:

Zhen, again with views zafigachit author / year in the title - Brachycodilla carmen. Take a look at this thing, OK? Or, I think, can really simplify zaprogrammit to heighten even boot option, the program was able to rake the option when the year with the title in a bottle ...

22.02.2011 18:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.02.2011 18:54, Peter Khramov:

Good. Moved and activated.

22.02.2011 18:51, Peter Khramov:

19 new snapshot from Natalia Demchenko Dmitry and Yuri Semeykina Pozhogin - in our gallery.

22.02.2011 17:29, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 17:29, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 17:23, Evgeny Komarov:

I have yet deleted. But let even colleagues will vote.

22.02.2011 17:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Fouled up, maybe. Now databased for sure.

22.02.2011 16:51, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the kind of Rhymnaria - delete it, a summary will be?

22.02.2011 16:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved to theclas.

22.02.2011 16:46, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

22.02.2011 16:46, Peter Khramov:

Funny guy. But not databased anyway. Evgeny, false start or some technical bug?

22.02.2011 16:45, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain", amen.

22.02.2011 16:44, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain" then.

22.02.2011 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.02.2011 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Done.

22.02.2011 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Done.

22.02.2011 16:41, Peter Khramov:

Let it be female.

22.02.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Ok.

22.02.2011 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.02.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov:

To go.

22.02.2011 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.02.2011 15:53, Peter Khramov:

Added (I took eol.org).

22.02.2011 12:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.02.2011 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Genus were added already.

22.02.2011 10:15, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 10:15, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 10:09, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 10:08, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 9:12, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 9:12, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 7:15, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 7:15, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 7:09, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 7:09, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 7:08, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 7:07, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 7:03, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 7:03, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 7:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Add family Aididae - bred, and those with this Guyana.

22.02.2011 6:53, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 6:53, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 6:45, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 6:45, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 6:33, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 6:28, Evgeny Komarov:

To "uncertain".

22.02.2011 6:14, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 6:14, Evgeny Komarov:

To "uncertain". Few are similar also, but this is the best one.

22.02.2011 6:13, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 6:00, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

22.02.2011 6:00, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2011 5:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Seems just Argynnis paphia. Don't pass as similar one above, Argynnis (Argyronome) ruslana Motschulsky, 1866. Underside needed.

22.02.2011 5:40, Evgeny Komarov:

21-02-2011, Petr Khramov: comment on photo # 6201
Gone to the male. Eugene, and here's the proof of why, if you yourself defined? Or first, doubts were?

A Bulo Schaub krepshe :)

22.02.2011 5:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Thecla betulae (Linnaeus, 1758).

22.02.2011 2:55, Peter Khramov:

Moved. What a shot location ;--)

22.02.2011 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Messages read, a conclusion is made. :)
When will definitely look into the base.

22.02.2011 1:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rhyparia purpurata (Linnaeus, 1758).

22.02.2011 1:02, Peter Khramov:

Comment concerned the species not its photo, moved to the species description page http://lepidoptera.pro/species/issoria-eugenia/.

22.02.2011 1:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

21.02.2011 23:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Noctuidae Manbuta sp.

21.02.2011 23:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

21.02.2011 22:55, Peter Khramov:

45 pictures from Natalia Demchenko Evgeny Komarov Stanislav Korba, Constantine Krajewski, Andrey Ponomaryov and Yuri Semeykina.

21.02.2011 21:50, Peter Khramov:

To go to "identified successfully".

21.02.2011 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.02.2011 21:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to males. Evgeny, why approved if it's you who identified that? Or had some doubts before?

21.02.2011 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Went to "identified successfully".

21.02.2011 21:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.02.2011 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Plus 100500 to report Eugene. Moderators do not keep track of everything ...

21.02.2011 20:18, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues Please all of us :) If you have defined the form of photos (especially important for Guyana), which is not present in the catalog or in the database, and the same kind of no - just add a genus / species. This is easier to do at this point. And that then enumerates uncertain, see definition, any kind of any kind is not in the database.Let us manifest the principle of The Little Prince - we are responsible for those who have identified ... :) We find them a place on this site.

21.02.2011 20:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues Please all of us :) If you have defined the form of photos (especially important for Guyana), which is not present in the catalog or in the database, and the same kind of no - just add a genus / species. This is easier to do at this point. And that then enumerates uncertain, see definition, any kind of any kind is not in the database.Let us manifest the principle of The Little Prince - we are responsible for those who have identified ... :) We find them a place on this site.

21.02.2011 20:10, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 20:10, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 20:07, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 20:07, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 20:03, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 20:03, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 20:03, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 20:03, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 19:53, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 19:53, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 19:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues Please all of us :) If you have defined the form of photos (especially important for Guyana), which is not present in the catalog or in the database, and the same kind of no - just add a genus / species. This is easier to do at this point. And that then enumerates uncertain, see definition, any kind of any kind is not in the database.Let us manifest the principle of The Little Prince - we are responsible for those who have identified ... :) We find them a place on this site.

21.02.2011 19:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Open "undefined " and all that he saw in the 16-30 kopecks. Honestly - quite sober :) Now this is nothing there. But it was the same! And after the first two I discovered another pile and wrote his last post. Sometimes.

21.02.2011 19:33, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, Dmitry, among Guyanese ph still remain unapproved / nezanesennye views. As time will be - asked to approve ...

21.02.2011 19:27, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to S. concisa.

21.02.2011 19:22, Peter Khramov:

To go.

21.02.2011 19:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.02.2011 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved/activated.

21.02.2011 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.02.2011 19:20, Peter Khramov:

Harpyia nodicornis deleted.

21.02.2011 19:19, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, where are you saw these glitches? Not not certain either 6208 or 6202. All the standards there.

21.02.2011 18:24, Peter Khramov:

On funetah, I look, too, is cut ...

21.02.2011 17:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I do not know how to be! We'll have to split up ornithopter, papillomas, Parnassus !!!

21.02.2011 16:40, Natalia Demchenko:

Seems to be Hypomecis roboraria....

21.02.2011 16:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! There is very often a mess - were allegedly transferred types and uncertain.

21.02.2011 16:36, Evgeny Komarov:

It is the same here http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6202/

21.02.2011 16:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Here glitch - hangs in uncertain http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6208/

21.02.2011 16:33, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 16:33, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 15:38, Evgeny Komarov:

And now view http://lepidoptera.ru/species/harpyia-nodicornis/ removed from the sort! My blunder!

21.02.2011 15:32, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 15:32, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 15:32, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 15:32, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 15:30, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 15:30, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 13:12, Peter Khramov:

Done too.

21.02.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov:

Done.

21.02.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

21.02.2011 13:10, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved, G. cinga activated.

21.02.2011 13:09, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, ready to go.

21.02.2011 13:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

21.02.2011 13:08, Peter Khramov:

To go.

21.02.2011 13:08, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to A. armida, adjacent species activated.

21.02.2011 13:07, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved, species activated.

21.02.2011 13:07, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved. Evgeny, why approved? To up the shot or?

21.02.2011 13:05, Peter Khramov:

Brahmaeidae activated, Notoplusia removed, Mimallonidae introduced into the database.

21.02.2011 11:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Amaricampa muscipilosa (Dognin, 1916).

21.02.2011 11:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Amaricampa muscipilosa (Dognin, 1916).

21.02.2011 11:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Add family Mimallonidae!

21.02.2011 11:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Rhode Notoplusia Schaus, 1901 mistakenly driven into Noctuidae, remove from there !!!

21.02.2011 10:13, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 10:13, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 10:06, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 10:06, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 10:02, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 10:02, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 9:59, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 9:59, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 9:58, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 9:58, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 9:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Family Brahmaeidae plant in the catalog - a photo and birth added one already. Then he lay still - it is necessary to shoot at your own collection.
And Rhode Arsenura in Saturnia with views I have added. Photos have -http: //lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6280/!

21.02.2011 9:29, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 9:29, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 9:12, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

21.02.2011 7:46, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 7:45, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

21.02.2011 7:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Eulepidotis juncida, (Guenée, 1852).

21.02.2011 7:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Eulepidotis juliata, (Stoll, 1790).

21.02.2011 1:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.02.2011 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, Ok.

20.02.2011 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

20.02.2011 21:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Prepiella radicans, Hampson, 1905.

20.02.2011 21:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Malocampa piratica, Schaus, 1905, seems to be female.

20.02.2011 21:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hapigia notha, Möschler, 1883.

20.02.2011 20:22, Evgeny Komarov:

More from the database to the directory that's http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/6341/

20.02.2011 20:18, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

20.02.2011 20:18, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

20.02.2011 20:11, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

20.02.2011 20:11, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

20.02.2011 20:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! Genus/species added.

20.02.2011 19:26, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

20.02.2011 19:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

20.02.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

20.02.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

20.02.2011 19:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

20.02.2011 19:21, Peter Khramov:

Dear gentlemen moderators, please, add and approve species to the lower one, Sauritinia concisa, (Walker, 1854), and I will add then this photo to it.

20.02.2011 19:18, Peter Khramov:

New species needed (to add and approve).

20.02.2011 19:18, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved, species activated.

20.02.2011 19:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved to G. guttipalpis.

20.02.2011 19:15, Peter Khramov:

Dmitri, in connection with the situation of Papilio victorinus again ask: before you start a new kind, it is necessary to look, whether its synonyms among existing and, if there is, not to have a new, and rename the old indicating synonyms ...

20.02.2011 19:11, Peter Khramov:

Due to the reconstruction of the system, photo goes from Papilio victorinus to P. menatius victorinus subspecies.

20.02.2011 19:08, Peter Khramov:

Regarding birth - yes, there was glyuchok when some genera machine is not activated, although they got active species. Now Gluck beaten and inactive generations (around 18 pieces) enabled.Apparently, that's why a Teinopalpus Dmitry neponyatki - species as any, but if they do not dig through search or directory, and in the classification in the kind they do not show, because race was inactive. Now all corrected types are available everywhere, information on subspecies has not disappeared anywhere.

20.02.2011 18:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Start the discussion on the page and type Protesilaus protesilaus since it has grown, it has decided to continue here. And shifting the first post in a single "bunch " for clarity.
20-02-2011 Dmitry Pozhogin: remove this family
02.20.2011, Evgeny Komarov: Dmitry, and what is it?
20-02-2011 Dmitry Pozhogin: Eurytides, Protesilaus, Mimoides will integrate better into the genus Eurytides
02.20.2011, Evgeny Komarov: Reason? While in http://swallowtails.net/ and http://www.nhm.ac.uk / research-curation / research / projects / butmoth / this kind of independent figures. There is something more sane?
20-02-2011 Dmitry Pozhogin: I like http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com Opler & Warren, 2003 Butterflies of North America. Scott, James A.1986; The Butterflies of North America

Dmitri might be so, but at this site, and sources have cited unlike me that they did not represent the group on the scale of the world's fauna, as well as, as I understand it, the reduction of births alone, and there is recognized.Actually, I do not mind - I am afraid "blurring " structure of major and widespread families into pieces. Ie, to take one part of the European vision for another North American, etc. Let's discuss!

20.02.2011 17:18, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

20.02.2011 16:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hapigia simplex (Walker, 1865).

20.02.2011 15:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looks very similar to Apela leechi (Druce, 1904).

20.02.2011 14:50, Evgeny Komarov:

The Saturn concrete must be transferred to the directory from the base: Archaeoattacus Watson, 1914, Athletes Karsch, 1896, Caio Travassos & Noronha, 1968, Eustera Duncan & Westwood, [1841], Lobobunaea Packard, 1901, Pseudimbrasia Rougeot, 1962, Samia Hübner, 1819 . All these genera are illustrated!

20.02.2011 14:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Apela divisa, Walker, 1855.

20.02.2011 14:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Notodontidae, Hapigia smerinthina, Schaus, 1928.

20.02.2011 14:18, Evgeny Komarov:

The Saturn concrete must be transferred to the directory from the base: Archaeoattacus Watson, 1914, Athletes Karsch, 1896, Caio Travassos & Noronha, 1968, Eustera Duncan & Westwood, [1841], Lobobunaea Packard, 1901, Pseudimbrasia Rougeot, 1962, Samia Hübner, 1819 . All these genera are illustrated!

20.02.2011 14:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hapigia nodicornis, Guenèe, 1852, Notodontidae.

20.02.2011 13:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Meandrusa already see !!! Teinopalpus where ???

20.02.2011 13:00, Evgeny Komarov:

The genus Teinopalpus, which Dmitry worried, put a photo in the LC!

20.02.2011 12:59, Evgeny Komarov:

And a whole bunch of sorts already with photos of Saturn is still in the database! There's only two kinds of photos do not have, and the rest can be in the catalog!

20.02.2011 12:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Himerarctia Watson, 1975 was transferred to a catalog!

20.02.2011 12:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Then Oospila marginata, Warren, 1897, to "uncertain". There is no any more similar amidst shown than this.

20.02.2011 12:20, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

20.02.2011 12:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Konstantin Krayevsky is right, this is Rhescynthis hippodamia hippodamia (Cramer, 1777).

20.02.2011 10:07, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Oospila.

20.02.2011 9:34, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Synchlora gerularia, Hübner, [1823].

20.02.2011 9:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

20.02.2011 9:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Can suggest only Neophanis frauenfeldi (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1874) of my stocks. http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Noctuidae/Noctuidae%202/Guy%2003156s2.jpg.

20.02.2011 9:05, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

20.02.2011 9:00, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

20.02.2011 8:53, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

20.02.2011 4:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hemiceras flava (Schaus, 1905), Famille Notodontidae.

20.02.2011 4:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hemiceras flava (Schaus, 1905), Famille Notodontidae.

20.02.2011 4:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Crinodes bellatrix, [Stoll, 1780], Famille Notodontidae.

20.02.2011 4:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Crinodes bellatrix, [Stoll, 1780], Famille Notodontidae.

20.02.2011 4:26, Alexandr Zhakov:

Guess, Artace cribraria (Ljungh, 1825), Lasiocampidae.

20.02.2011 3:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

Fam. Mimallonidae, Bedosia fraterna male (Schaus, 1905).

20.02.2011 3:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Brachycodilla carmen (Schaus, 1892), Famille Aididae.

20.02.2011 3:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pentobesa apostatica, Dyar, 1915.

20.02.2011 3:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Rhuda focula, [Stoll, 1780].

20.02.2011 3:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Strophocerus cossoides, Schaus, 1904.

20.02.2011 3:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Strophocerus cossoides, Schaus, 1904.

20.02.2011 3:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

Notoplusia clara [Stoll, 1780].

20.02.2011 3:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lepasta grammodes, Felder, 1874.

20.02.2011 2:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Goodgeria cinga (Schaus, 1924), Notodontidae.

20.02.2011 2:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Goodgeria cinga (Schaus, 1924), Notodontidae.

20.02.2011 2:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

The upper one is Cresera hieroglyphica (Schaus, 1905), the lower is Sauritinia concisa, (Walker, 1854).

20.02.2011 2:35, Peter Khramov:

Meandrusa - 2 species in the directory and one subspecies in the database without subspecies. Is there something wrong?

20.02.2011 2:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

False start: this one is Hypercompe perplexa, Schaus 1911, though they differ just a little, canigunda cephalothorax upper spots are bigger.

20.02.2011 1:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hypercompe canigunda (Stoll, 1781).

20.02.2011 1:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Calonotos helymus (Cramer, 1775).

20.02.2011 1:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Trichromia androconiata (Rothschild, 1909).

20.02.2011 1:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

Approve Glaucostola guttipalpis (Walker, 1856).

20.02.2011 0:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And what happened with the kind of subspecies of the genera
• Meandrusa Moore, 1888
• Teinopalpus Hope, 1843 ???

19.02.2011 23:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Glaucostola guttipalpis (Walker, 1856)???

19.02.2011 23:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rhipha albiplaga ???

19.02.2011 23:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Trichromia.

19.02.2011 22:50, Peter Khramov:

No problem. Just keep in mind...

19.02.2011 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Went to L. fimbriaria.

19.02.2011 22:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to H. docis. Cool pic, by the way.

19.02.2011 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.02.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov:

To go.

19.02.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.02.2011 22:45, Peter Khramov:

Not databased...

19.02.2011 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Goes to M. januaris.

19.02.2011 22:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Hey, not all in one day! Will add tomorrow.

19.02.2011 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Poor thing... Moved.

19.02.2011 22:43, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

19.02.2011 22:42, Peter Khramov:

To go.

19.02.2011 22:42, Peter Khramov:

Went to R. erycina.

19.02.2011 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, not databased yet...

19.02.2011 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.02.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

19.02.2011 22:36, Peter Khramov:

770 subspecies. Dmitry, you - the monster!

19.02.2011 22:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Manduca florestan (Stoll, 1782).

19.02.2011 22:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Leuciris fimbriaria.

19.02.2011 21:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Himerarctia docis (Hübner, 1831).

19.02.2011 20:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Cicinnus joanna, ♂, Schaus, 1905, Mimallonidae.

19.02.2011 19:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Othorene hodeva ♀, (Druce, 1904).

19.02.2011 19:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Arsenura armida ♂ (Cramer, 1779).

19.02.2011 19:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Rhescyntis hippodamia (Cramer, 1777).

19.02.2011 19:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Leuciris fimbriaria.

19.02.2011 19:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I finish genus Papilio.

19.02.2011 18:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Perigonia lusca, Walker, 1865.

19.02.2011 18:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Citheronia hamifera, W. Rothschild, 1907.

19.02.2011 18:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Melipotis januaris (Guenée, 1852).

19.02.2011 18:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Rothschildia aurota (Cramer, 1775).

19.02.2011 18:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Rothschildia aurota (Cramer, 1775).

19.02.2011 18:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Rothschildia erycina (Shaw, 1796).

19.02.2011 18:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Rothschildia erycina (Shaw, 1796).

19.02.2011 17:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Pachylia darceta, Druce, 1881.

19.02.2011 17:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Xylophanes titana, Druce, 1878.

19.02.2011 17:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Ok! Sometimes we deform foreign names so much when translating. Maybe we should just put original name without changing.

19.02.2011 17:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Only Diaphania genus still.

19.02.2011 17:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Syngamia florella (Stoll, 1781).

19.02.2011 16:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is male.

19.02.2011 16:35, Peter Khramov:

Ugh. And what right can be wrong?

19.02.2011 16:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Ocrasa, Herculia junior synonyms Hypsopygia http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=442523
with tasonom Ocrasa general neponyatki at Sineva he subgenus Hypsopygia, but with a completely different author and year.

19.02.2011 15:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

All! Stop. Again, the right mouse button does not plow. Che is it ???

19.02.2011 15:15, Peter Khramov:

Well, Dim, you're on the subspecies and dispersed. Pleasure to watch! -))

19.02.2011 15:02, Peter Khramov:

And ... I Got it. Removed Fautua. So Herculia fulvocilialis, it also Ocrasa fulvocilialis has to Hypsopygia fulvocilialis? In appearance, look, look.

19.02.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov:

To go.

19.02.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

19.02.2011 14:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Diaphania nitidalis (Stoll, 1781).

19.02.2011 14:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maruca vitrata (Fabricius, 1787).

19.02.2011 14:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

The gallery was not born Orthopygia 0 species and to him prikpeplena photo # 3853 without text.

19.02.2011 14:02, Peter Khramov:

# 6196 - a strange glitch ... Now corrected.
As for the # 3853 and # 3854 - did not immediately Perens, because waiting for a comment from the author photo - Sergey Novitsky. He is now on soap said that, they say, agree. Regarding the kind of Orthopygia do not understand what it was about - fulvocilialis site has only as Herculia fulvocilialis. Who can clarify the situation?

19.02.2011 13:56, Peter Khramov:

More than a hundred new photos of Constantine Krajewski Gallery.

19.02.2011 11:49, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, should or not?

19.02.2011 11:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Photo Butterfly # 6196. (type not specified) .18-02-2011, Petr Khramov:
Photo postponed.
And it is not moved, I forgot to move, Peter?

19.02.2011 11:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

A request is made to deal with this photo Photo # 3853
Type defined incorrectly. It Hypsopygia fulvocilialis (Duponchel 1834), but it is still in the race Orthopygia entered without species descriptions. Gluck?

19.02.2011 1:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

But Iqvitos should be changed to Iquitos.

19.02.2011 1:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

18.02.2011 23:28, Peter Khramov:

If no, so yes.

18.02.2011 22:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No versions but Colias myrmidone.

18.02.2011 21:40, Peter Khramov:

Since on the length of the wing / span nobody seems to be not spoken, will operate a dual system - ie, You can specify (and look) for both indications.

18.02.2011 20:06, Peter Khramov:

To A. catoxantha (uncertain).

18.02.2011 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

18.02.2011 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Goes to C. viridata.

18.02.2011 20:03, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

18.02.2011 20:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to jurtina.

18.02.2011 20:01, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

18.02.2011 19:59, Peter Khramov:

Goes to thersamon.

18.02.2011 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Went to icarus.

18.02.2011 19:58, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, I moved ...

18.02.2011 19:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Meant M. jurtina.

18.02.2011 19:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

18.02.2011 19:51, Peter Khramov:

Ok, all fixed.

18.02.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

18.02.2011 19:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

18.02.2011 15:29, Eugene Davkaev:

Sergey Toropov identified it as Polyommatus icarus turanicus, Heyne, 1895.

18.02.2011 15:29, Eugene Davkaev:

Sergey Toropov identified it as Polyommatus icarus turanicus, Heyne, 1895.

18.02.2011 15:28, Eugene Davkaev:

Sergey Toropov identified this as Thersamonia thersamon persica, Bienert, 1870.

18.02.2011 15:06, Eugene Davkaev:

Sergey Toropov identified this as Thersamonia thersamon persica, Bienert, 1870.

18.02.2011 14:45, Eugene Davkaev:

Seems to be some Noctuidae, Cucula genus (Cuculliinae).

18.02.2011 10:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Appeared - transfer http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5712/ and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5711/ to Sciota adelphella - error.

18.02.2011 10:43, Andrey Ponomarev:

http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5712/ and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5711/ is Sciota adelphella

Maybe it's my fault when loading.

18.02.2011 5:54, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

18.02.2011 5:48, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

18.02.2011 5:39, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

18.02.2011 5:39, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

18.02.2011 2:49, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M. jurtina.

18.02.2011 0:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

Male: http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?search=Melipotis+januaris.

18.02.2011 0:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Melipotis januaris, (Guenée, 1852).

17.02.2011 23:59, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2011 21:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Eugene Caroline, 17-02-2011 20:24
Eugene! Rod did, kind of moved. It remains to find the photo :)

17.02.2011 20:24, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Petr Khramov 2:10 16.02.2011: "Eugene, such comments would be appropriate on the description page of the form. But in the case - istochnichek to ... "

Duc, this same page, and I just have not found ... :) Source - at least here: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?act=Attach&type=post&id=106080

All that matters is that it is - the kind recently found in Russia (in particular - in Dagestan), so it is not in the blue.

17.02.2011 20:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Encruphion phalereus, Schaus, 1914 - Noctuidae.

17.02.2011 20:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2011 20:14, Eugene Karolinskiy: This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2011 19:52, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

17.02.2011 19:52, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

17.02.2011 19:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Crambidae.

17.02.2011 15:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Chlorissa viridata, Linnaeus, 1758.

17.02.2011 15:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Camptogramma bilineata, Linnaeus, 1758.

17.02.2011 11:24, Andrey Ponomarev:

Sciota adelphella.

17.02.2011 11:23, Andrey Ponomarev:

I might have made a mistake while uploading this as well as the second photo from the side, but this is Sciota adelphella.

17.02.2011 8:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Adeloneivaia subangulata ♂ / Adeloneivaia catoxantha ♂, 50 to 50!

17.02.2011 3:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maruca vitrata (Fabricius, 1787).

17.02.2011 0:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Good luck!

17.02.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, on the kinds of editing - now, apparently, on the weekends I can do something thread. Who will need to pull in a couple of days ...

16.02.2011 23:31, Evgeny Komarov:

All OK! Hit the transfer point! All displayed :)

16.02.2011 23:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter here Coenophlebia archidona (http://lepidoptera.ru/species/coenophlebia-archidona/) photos there, but the page of the form are not displayed.

16.02.2011 23:02, Peter Khramov:

94 pictures from the Hope Flegontova, Davkaeva Eugene, Eugene Komarov and Konstantin Krajewski

16.02.2011 9:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Scoop Hecatera bicolorata (Hufnagel, 1766) twice - one with a photo and right, the second without a photo without parentheses the author / year! Correct!

16.02.2011 7:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! It requires cleaning - to clean the Nymphalidae genus Asterope Hübner, [1819] Hübner, [1819] wound "tail " of the author / year correctly wound already there with the types and photos.

16.02.2011 3:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Purely theoretically: Author [& Author, Year]; (Author [& Author, Year]); Author, Author & Author, Year; (Author, Author & Author, Year). Last seen.

16.02.2011 3:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identified wrongly. This is Hypsopygia fulvocilialis (Duponchel 1834).

16.02.2011 3:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identified wrongly. This is Hypsopygia fulvocilialis (Duponchel 1834).

16.02.2011 2:10, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, such comments would be appropriate on the description page of the form. And in the case - istochnichek to ...

16.02.2011 1:12, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Nordmannia ledereri Boisduval, 1848: should be replaced by Armenia ledereri (Boisduval, 1848) - with the kind of crushing Satyrium this kind of falls into another generation. I do not know where it should leave a comment, therefore I leave here. :)

15.02.2011 22:32, Peter Khramov:

And there this poodle chick...

15.02.2011 21:55, Peter Khramov:

And all of them - from Andrey Ponomarev.

15.02.2011 17:47, Peter Khramov:

Goes to P. orsilocha.

15.02.2011 17:47, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to P. orsilocha.

15.02.2011 17:46, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to P. orsilocha.

15.02.2011 17:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.02.2011 17:45, Peter Khramov:

It does not take, it is one and the same Fota, but the blasted. Fixed.

15.02.2011 15:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Two goals in uncertain forms: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3239/. This image is defined and located in the directory - Calliteara virginea, but somehow deduced and uncertain.

15.02.2011 15:29, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

15.02.2011 15:29, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2011 15:29, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

15.02.2011 15:29, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2011 15:28, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

15.02.2011 15:28, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2011 15:28, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

15.02.2011 15:28, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2011 13:44, Peter Khramov:

Goes to M. lanata.

15.02.2011 13:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to M. lanata.

15.02.2011 13:43, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

15.02.2011 13:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.02.2011 13:41, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

15.02.2011 13:40, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved. Parentheses for such cases are not done yet.

15.02.2011 13:39, Peter Khramov:

Done, moving.

15.02.2011 13:12, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2011 13:11, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

15.02.2011 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I added few species yesterday morning (this also, maybe). I may be wrong (use logs since now). Extras should be removed, for sure, and genus needed classifying.

15.02.2011 9:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr Khramov 1:52 15.02.2011 "About vyshibanie - will do, but the time you need. And meanwhile - you are storing enable password in the browser, and nothing you need not be, just press the button" Enter ". However, if a stranger / work computer, you should not, of course. "

Here I am about the same (if your computer). In Opera has a very useful thing.It is called "Password Manager " (the key to the left of the button to refresh the page). This stuff is very good aki remembers all previously entered. Simply click on this key and you are there, under his own name. This is assuming that "the files cookie " not clean. By the way: in times posleny Loginov hand on December 19 and until now simply click on this key.Total business somehow? And if a stranger computer - useful to have a file txt., Doc. etc. with their accounts and simply copy-paste paste, if necessary.

15.02.2011 1:57, Peter Khramov:

Oh yes, Author, [Year] now also plow.

15.02.2011 1:56, Peter Khramov:

With regard to the brackets. Now work correctly options:
Author, Year; (Author, Year); (Author, [Year]); ([Author], Year).
As I understand it, you need to add:
Author [& Author] Year; (Author [& Author], year); [Author, Year]; ([Author, Year]).
I'm right? All this can be? Maybe something else? Please comment on all who have access to this topic and read it.

15.02.2011 1:53, Peter Khramov:

All possible parentheses or brackets should be rewritten...

15.02.2011 1:52, Peter Khramov:

About braces - yes, I have to do. Yes, there in the next topic was found out another option. In general, the horror.
About vyshibanie - I will do, but the time you need. And meanwhile - already enable you remember your password in the browser, and do not need to enter is only button press "Enter." Although, if a stranger / the working computer, you should not, of course.About slowly opened - has the right to slow down the overall community page http://lepidoptera.ru/community/ - could be opened 20 seconds is not yet managed to fix it. The rest of the pages should load quickly, even if it slows something - ask to give specific references, see / check.

15.02.2011 0:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitriy! I'm afraid you have a problem, not on the site. At least I have all added smartly and staff work. And about "vyshibanie site " I ask myself: Peter !!! Well, do something. Happy at work, and at home has to break away from the "primary activity " and well, very annoying login to the system. Password - to hell with him, but the mail each time ...

15.02.2011 0:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Good this one is described in genus at least, or there would be parentheses then.

15.02.2011 0:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Author and year are supposable (indirect info). Reference has no publication date and author name, or there is group of authors. :)

15.02.2011 0:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

15.02.2011 0:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

kakaya- the crap going on. when you enter the type / podvida- my kicks from the site, you need to enter flogged. plus all entered infa disappears. not working right mouse button (only here on the site) plus sooo long everything was loaded

15.02.2011 0:21, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sure. I did it many times. :) Actually, I didn't mean aurelia, but wondered why britomartis, that's all.

15.02.2011 0:11, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2011 0:10, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

15.02.2011 0:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Not since the morning, I demoderated species in lunchtime :) Petr, please, remove flood (mine also).

15.02.2011 0:04, Evgeny Komarov:

A version of these brackets, as it turned out, too, can be ... :) :) :)

15.02.2011 0:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I hope that did not have time zamorochitsya my previous request! "Kill " introduced me kind Eustera Duncan & Westwood, [1841], as after "digs " found that it reduced to a synonym for Eudaemonia, which I successfully introduced - there are no problems with parentheses :)

14.02.2011 23:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Faced with a situation where in author / year also did not put parentheses right. It is necessary to put Eustera Duncan [& Westwood], 1841, and turns Eustera Duncan & Westwood, [1841]. We got you these options parenthesis, but ... :)

14.02.2011 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where is it, huh?

14.02.2011 23:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

14.02.2011 23:31, Peter Khramov:

Oh, god, what the hell is that? Brackets? What Torquemadas invented this nomenclature... Send me back to the 18th century.

14.02.2011 23:29, Peter Khramov:

No, not approved yet...

14.02.2011 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Oh ёёёёёё ...

14.02.2011 23:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Faced with a situation where in author / year also did not put parentheses right. It is necessary to put Eustera Duncan [& Westwood], 1841, and turns Eustera Duncan & Westwood, [1841]. We got you these options parenthesis, but ... :)

14.02.2011 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Where art thou, Evgeny, Dmitry? Save the genus! No response, no response.

14.02.2011 23:06, Evgeny Komarov:

These beasts can be identified without microscoping genitalia as 50 to 50 :)

14.02.2011 22:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that really there. I can give an example, as the old pronunciation of the letter X to the rank of obscene concepts are now built :) I will write "Genera ". Eugene, in Megalopygidae adopt necessary (where everything is ready).

14.02.2011 22:48, Peter Khramov:

That floor is my favorite:
The letter "E" placed in 4 cases:
1) In the literature for children and foreigners.
2) The proper names (Alena, Mikhalev, Catherine Deneuve ...). In addition to those that are the same in writing with the common nouns are formed from them, such as the Black Sea.3) In the unfamiliar words (river Alёntra ...)
4) If this changes the meaning of (a bucket or buckets, learns or finds out).

14.02.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov:

I previously wrote "kind" by analogy with the "combat arms", it turned out - nifiga analogy is not correct ...
By the way, who will be at your leisure to do nefig - interesting infa on Russian http://baddcat.livejournal.com/92274.html and http://baddcat.livejournal.com/92434.html

14.02.2011 22:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! I was ashamed of something you own remark to make, but once emerged: a birth, not race! The service can, and so, as the pages are available do not! And so the Russian language has dropped through the floor!
Petr Khramov, 22:11 14.02.2011 - So that's why I asked!

14.02.2011 22:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I have just the language does not say so povorachivetsya (Childbirth - is when giving birth, although the emphasis on a different syllable). Poetomy "kind " always writing. :)

14.02.2011 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK, I do sort / views.

14.02.2011 22:33, Peter Khramov:

I've been recently pointed out - it turns out, the plural is "genera." Awesome I was surprised, then checked - and the truth. Horror some.

14.02.2011 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK, I do sort / views.

14.02.2011 22:12, Peter Khramov:

Poor genus, not approved since the very morning...

14.02.2011 22:11, Peter Khramov:

Basil, the family said.
Eugene, at the fact that the view is the only way - I say, I'm kind of not looking at the page, sort, I am looking for it in the database.
Regarding species Rothschildia - added Dmitry, discuss the matter with him before to change something.

14.02.2011 22:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Look comments to #5794 photo.

14.02.2011 22:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Fine! If so, doubts are irrelevant. :)

14.02.2011 22:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one is also should be approved.

14.02.2011 22:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: The species is added to the database/approved.

14.02.2011 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Approve genus, please (not approved since the very morning).

14.02.2011 21:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry! Approve #5515 shot, that's yours!

14.02.2011 21:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Telchin licus (Drury, 1773).

14.02.2011 20:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, create Megalopygidae Herrich-Schäffer, 1855 (6 photos have been there). Genus and species will be done as a family

14.02.2011 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 20:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Suggest Hemiceras meona, [Stoll, 1781]
http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Notodontidae/Notod%204/Guy%2003348-s3.jpg. Didn't find other pics.

14.02.2011 20:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, 14-02-2011 20:02
Something strange: and I have the same sin 2nd day
Also it is necessary to rearrange: http://lepidoptera.ru/genus/desmia/

Yes, sin is clear - when the copy-paste from the site, and there between the author and the year of the comma is not put - this is and get :) should look carefully!

14.02.2011 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena lonicerae (Scheven, 1777).

14.02.2011 20:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 20:14 14.02.2011
"Lord, you write a particular type of, not race, in which he is, I'm not kind to rule on the page something will ... "

Yes, he was there in the way only !!!

14.02.2011 20:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! And who types in the genus Rothschildia added? There need to edit something - subtypes appear in the status of species. I just collect a large stash of pictures of Saturn's ship, but there is not quite the procedure, based on the http://www.saturniidae-web.de/ and other sites on the Saturn.

14.02.2011 20:14, Peter Khramov:

Lord, you write a particular type of, not race, in which he is, I'm not kind to rule on the page something will ... Basil is now correct identity.

14.02.2011 20:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyge lanata (Cramer, 1780).

14.02.2011 20:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yevgeny Komarov, 14-02-2011 19:47

Well, only about one sin wrote immediately the other - also in Saturn's race Lobobunaea, Packard1901 - rearrange commas correctly !!!
Something strange: and I have the same sin 2nd day
Also it is necessary to rearrange: http://lepidoptera.ru/genus/desmia/

14.02.2011 19:56, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, defects corrected. Regarding cerisyi - the same tryndets again got a new type instead of the old, not the modified old ...

14.02.2011 19:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, only about one sin wrote immediately the other - also in Saturn's race Lobobunaea, Packard1901 - rearrange commas correctly !!!

14.02.2011 19:32, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Correct me please in-kind school Pseudimbrasia (Saturniidae) - I was there again to the species "tail " of the author has attached year. In normal view already with photos Head - Thoroughly clean the defective double!

14.02.2011 18:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

described as Thais cerisyi Godart, 1824

14.02.2011 18:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's it, I think: http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/MC-Honduras/MC-Honduras01.shtml
http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images7/pyrrha.htm.

14.02.2011 18:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There are separate families are:
http://www.guianensis.fr/systematique.htm
And I kind of do for them.

14.02.2011 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The Guyanese uncertain. Alexander 2 species of 2 genera identified (5 photos)
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5063/
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5075/
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5037/
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5079/
http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5080/

14.02.2011 17:21, Peter Khramov:

About Allancastria cerisy - fauna cerisy, are similarly at funete cerisyi. Summary?

14.02.2011 17:03, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and where the representatives of something where they came without family? Or it has not carried over fotah?

14.02.2011 17:02, Peter Khramov:

Species needed approving.

14.02.2011 17:01, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain".

14.02.2011 17:00, Peter Khramov:

New species needed, added and approved.

14.02.2011 16:59, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, please, add and approve new species...

14.02.2011 16:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved to D. nitidalis.

14.02.2011 16:58, Peter Khramov:

Leaves "undetermined".

14.02.2011 16:57, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to "identified successfully".

14.02.2011 16:55, Peter Khramov:

Meh, you spoiled everything with your argus, as always... So moved to P. argus then.

14.02.2011 16:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.02.2011 9:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 8:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It must be a family Megalopygidae Herrich-Schäffer, 1855 to create. Two of their representative on the site have been.

14.02.2011 8:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 8:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 7:07, Evgeny Komarov:

One IMHO plus. Female and seems to have white margins on its forewings.

14.02.2011 6:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Evgeny! This very species and also #5795 have been not identified, but in that place there was another group which was identified (not by me) as britomartis. The man who identified may have checked genitalia. Doubts?

14.02.2011 1:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyginae Megalopyge lanata (Cramer, 1780). Darker than usual.

14.02.2011 1:10, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyge lanata.

14.02.2011 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyginae Podalia orsilocha (Cramer, 1775).

14.02.2011 0:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyginae Podalia orsilocha (Cramer, 1775).

14.02.2011 0:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyginae Podalia orsilocha (Cramer, 1775).

14.02.2011 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 0:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Megalopyginae Megalopyge lanata (Cramer, 1780).

14.02.2011 0:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 0:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eucereon marmoratum (Butler, 1878)
http://www.passions-papillons.com/Arctiidae/arctiidaeguyct.html#marm
http://www.cahurel-entomologie.com/ctenuchinae.htm.

14.02.2011 0:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Why the very this species?

14.02.2011 0:29, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Why not aurelia?

14.02.2011 0:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

IMHO, argus.

14.02.2011 0:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 0:11, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Including portraits and caterpillars. Image copyright: Vitaliy Gumenyuk, Evgeny Komarov and Eugene Davkaev.

14.02.2011 0:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

14.02.2011 0:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok then, let's set like this. Genus and species are databased (done in the morning, already approved). To move.

13.02.2011 23:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Looked through this genus also. Diaphania nitidalis (Stoll, 1781) varies mostly and most similar to.

13.02.2011 23:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Flash or just bright light reflected on its upper side. Roughly same pattern, I checked out this genus, all species (not so many), nothing similar.

13.02.2011 23:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Google knows not so much about this one.

13.02.2011 23:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Genus is right 100% sure.

13.02.2011 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to be: http://bugguide.net/node/view/339517/bgimage. But either it much varies http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=5202, or it is not this species at all?

13.02.2011 23:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why "uncertain"?

13.02.2011 23:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pyrochlora rhanis???

13.02.2011 23:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Diaphania nitidalis (Stoll, 1781).

13.02.2011 23:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Mocis dyndima ???

13.02.2011 23:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Don't agree, I see the very this of Crambidae, anyway can be moved to "uncertain".

13.02.2011 23:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

13.02.2011 23:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Maybe, genus is right, but species looks different: http://www.inbio.ac.cr/diquis/index.php?option=com_joomgallery&func=detail&id=444&Itemid=6#joomimg.

13.02.2011 23:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rod may be correct, but does not look like the form =
http://www.inbio.ac.cr/diquis/index.php?option=com_joomgallery&func=detail&id=444&Itemid=6#joomimg

13.02.2011 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

13.02.2011 23:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

One more of Pyralidae is done. http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images9/desbaj.htm, that's it.

13.02.2011 23:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

Desmia bajulalis, Guenée 1854.

13.02.2011 22:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Petr Khramov, 20:55 13.02.2011
Allancastria cerisyi - duplicates do not see
I do not see ??? one with fotoy in the directory - drugaya- not in catalog

13.02.2011 22:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Same species on both pictures.

13.02.2011 22:23, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.02.2011 22:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Proved!

13.02.2011 22:22, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

13.02.2011 22:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 21:19 13.02.2011 - This nightmare is the result of a nightmare with the release of Crambidae Pyralidae - somewhere carelessly worked!

13.02.2011 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There it is: http://www.papillon-poitou-charentes.org/Gonodonta-sicheas-Cramer-1777,20719.html. And this is also: http://www.inra.fr/papillon/noctuid/ophideri/textfr/g_sichea.htm.

13.02.2011 21:19, Peter Khramov:

Summary of confusion with Nymphula stagnata - a new type of deleted data and photographs of him moved to the old, old renamed indicating synonyms. In the future, if you need to rename the old kind, not merely transferred from one generation to another, Eugene and Dmitry simply unsubscribe me, I'll do it. Later doleplyu system is that you could do yourself.But even with the system, though not - the old form (as a unit of a database on the website) is always an advantage over the new, ie renamed the old and the new will not start, and delete old ones.

13.02.2011 21:09, Peter Khramov:

Done.

13.02.2011 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://bugguide.net/node/view/348761.

13.02.2011 21:05, Peter Khramov:

Nicholas, I think it does not finding sought and substitution while downloading photos. For this substitution types in the database itself is quite relevant, and for site search - no, because they do not have an active home page.

13.02.2011 20:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one is to go to "identified" (approved).

13.02.2011 20:55, Peter Khramov:

Allancastria cerisyi - duplicates do not see. Allancastria cretica - Remove the second (added later) option.

13.02.2011 20:51, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, is this the same? http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/5515/.

13.02.2011 20:49, Peter Khramov:

Nicholas, in the foreseeable future - a special section in the Community, where messages are displayed on the user - in his comments fotam, themes and the like. Newsletter, too plans, but more distant.

13.02.2011 20:47, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, species is not approved yet. Approve, please...

13.02.2011 20:46, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, Nymphula stagnata Donovan, 1806 - an example of a nightmare, when activated by a new kind of instead of of the old, and the old one to be deleted. As repeated many times before - you can not do that! Only the transfer of the old to the new with the old indication as a synonym, and should not be removed the old and new look.Evgeni and Dimitri as moderators involved in base pay at this moment the most attention.

13.02.2011 20:41, Peter Khramov:

Regarding sailing directly into the directory - they are not just driven in the catalog. They are driven into the base, and then, for example, Dmitri enters information about the subspecies, and if there infa subspecies (or other elements of the description of the species) - type is activated for the catalog, despite the lack of illustrations.

13.02.2011 20:37, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.02.2011 20:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Hm, ok, let's move to "uncertain" then!

13.02.2011 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Quote that website:
"DISTRIBUTION: C. & S. America.
TYPE LOCALITY: Brazil.
BELIZE RECORDS: Greenhills.
METHOD OF IDENTIFICATION: adult illustrated by Seitz (1925) plate 5, fig. d4.
NOTES: if Seitz’ identification is correct this seems a quite characteristic species."

13.02.2011 20:13, Nikolai Vladimirov:

It would be nice to send a notice of the determination of an unknown species or inaccurate opredelnie mail the author ...
At the same time, once we went pro notice :) - I would like to be notified of and responses to the guest ...

13.02.2011 20:09, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Clearly, not guess :) Now uploading photos.

13.02.2011 20:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I digged that out somewhere in Belize: http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/plate13x.htm.

13.02.2011 20:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Take away view Nymphula stagnata Donovan, 1806 - he has kept us in a synonym for nitidulata!

13.02.2011 19:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Nymphula nitidulata - page is there, but not in the catalog, and in the base, i.e. is not activated due to lack of photos.

13.02.2011 19:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasily! If you google Tachyphyle basiplaga, images, you can see its expansion: Central America (not Guyana at all). And there is one more, even less similar, Costa Rica again! http://www.boldsystems.org/views/taxbrowser.php?taxid=280426. Link, please, what you used to identify!

13.02.2011 19:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Maybe, but not sure! Let's wait for colleagues' suggestions!

13.02.2011 19:15, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Although the type of search is sought.

13.02.2011 19:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Checked out my Castniidae and realized that we wrongly identified this one!!! It's Telchin licus (Drury, 1773).

13.02.2011 18:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is clear, and then flooded look. Well, I went to Guyana to finish.

13.02.2011 18:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Take away these 2 times • Allancastria cerisyi (Godart, 1824) • Allancastria cretica Rebel, 1904, they got me

13.02.2011 18:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I just drive in the name of a subspecies of sailboats.

13.02.2011 18:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I honestly did not examine this list yet.
Guys, why are driven directly to the catalog sailboats photos which are not present on the site? Or will be soon? Intriguing. :)

13.02.2011 18:20, Peter Khramov:

Typos corrected. People, if someone sends information to Eugene for doubles (as far as I can remember, at least, Alexander said that sent a sobiraalsya send) - accomplish your goal here would be necessary to understand the issue of ...

13.02.2011 18:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I also screwed up (not out there put a comma): http://lepidoptera.ru/genus/tachyphyle/ need to improve. That's right: Tachyphyle basiplaga Walker, 1861.
Something a little confused until naryl it.

13.02.2011 17:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Of information on a double, as I remember, no. And he did not look back seriously. Now briefly I looked - there are rare doubles. I will try to see - now it has become easy for sorted lists and descriptions of the authors.I'm hammered birth family Brahmaeidae and screwed in one place - the year of the author's description sewed to the species in the genus Brahmophthalma Mell, 1930 - straighten yourself. Well, the photo is uploaded to the family of one - can be activated.

13.02.2011 17:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What about this: http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/belizemoths/images8/gonsic.htm ? Gonodonta sicheas Cramer, 1777 ?

13.02.2011 17:08, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I am sorry for the typo. Fixed.
Basil, Eugene, thanks for the Old about the kinds. With regard to the author / year - I think for the next time I close up the system to the example page http://lepidoptera.ru/auniq/ was a page and a species that is in the unpublished photos, but not in the database. Speaking of the http: // lepidoptera.ru / auniq / - Eugene, where people seem to be sent information on duplicate, in theory, there should be quite a lot, and therefore, some species need to be removed. You have now this infa?
Basil, on the slashes - you wrote earlier - apparently were due to slashes in Title Some pages. Now I corrected.

13.02.2011 16:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tachyphyle basiplaga, Walker 1861.

13.02.2011 16:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Neotropical Heterocera website: http://www.mbarnes.force9.co.uk/.

13.02.2011 16:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gonodonta sp. (?syrna, Guenée,1852?)

13.02.2011 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Noctuidae.

13.02.2011 15:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sosxetra sp. (can't go further).

13.02.2011 15:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, 13.02.2011 15:00 - Let's not talk about Agroatlas, they can find this :) A childbirth Dasychira, Elkneria and Calliteara - there are troubles with the typical kinds (honor here http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/GenusDetails.dsml?NUMBER=9565.0)

13.02.2011 15:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, fix my surname in the latest news. A red-where-how is called: Dasychira (Plavilshchikov 1950 Mamaev 1976), Caliteara I do not know when, and called them, and the author is always the same: (Linnaeus, 1758) may submit the name of Soviet literature easily, and the view alone. And also awaiting Elkneria pudidunda: http://www.agroatlas.ru/ru/content/pests/Calliteara_pudibunda/ (vskidku estimated).

13.02.2011 14:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 11:58 13.02.2011 - Neoris is already in place. Dasychira podibunda - is Vasily rights - Calliteara pudibunda (Oshibochka even in the species). The synonyms scored. For the occasion - if the author photo and have the author's description of the year - are in these positions please. And then had to dig a well because of an error in the title (maybe it is something else), and was the author - not to think too much, TB photo, I can not see!
Plebejus allous - a Russian subspecies Aricia artaxerxes, t.e.A. artaxerxes allous Geyer, 1837. View is in the database and directory. About subspecies of written comments on the page of the form.
Agapeta hamana in the catalog and database.

13.02.2011 12:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agapeta hamana here: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/agapeta-hamana/ (search for it is not looking).

13.02.2011 12:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agapeta hamana directory is already there, and for Neoris huttoni race I did (my time is now).
Peter, correct my name: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/3660/ :)

13.02.2011 12:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By Plebejus allous: my right Aricia artaxerxes (Fabricius, 1793) where allous
a subspecies of it http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/aricia/index.html#artaxerxes allous

13.02.2011 12:26, Peter Khramov:

By Natalia Demchenko Elvira Izmailov, Yevgeny Komarov, Boris Stradomsky and Vasiliy Feoktistov.

13.02.2011 12:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dasychira podibunda http://lepidoptera.ru/species/calliteara-pudibunda/ it is certainly not necessary.

13.02.2011 11:58, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, Dmitry, please add the following to the base or their analogues with the indication of synonyms: Neoris huttoni, Dasychira podibunda, Plebejus allous, Agapeta hamana - photos of these species are now waiting for the publication. Thank you.

13.02.2011 11:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Right: Diaphania hyalinata (Linnaeus, 1767), year may be wrong.

13.02.2011 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Fouled up: Crambidae are separated and I'll add to them.

13.02.2011 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Crambidae, should be new genus added to Pyralidae?

13.02.2011 10:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Diaphania hyalinata (Linnaeus, 1758).

13.02.2011 10:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.02.2011 10:51, Peter Khramov:

Ok!

13.02.2011 8:49, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.02.2011 8:49, Evgeny Komarov:

To "uncertain"!

13.02.2011 8:37, Evgeny Komarov:

Hemipecteros lunula male (Dognin, 1908). Notodontidae. http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Notodontidae/Notodontidae2/Guy%2002477s3.jpg.

13.02.2011 8:23, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

13.02.2011 8:23, Evgeny Komarov:

To "uncertain"!

13.02.2011 2:35, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, once views moderation attrition.

13.02.2011 2:16, Peter Khramov:

Lord, today upgraded the data output of the authors involved in the publication of data on a page with a description of species (more - http://lepidoptera.ru/community/3644/). Sincesome of the data were introduced after the fact and in general the new system, please pay attention to the appropriate signatures and, if you notice that something is wrong, someone deprived of attention, while others, on the contrary, indicated once again - please let me know. Well, if everything is spelled correctly, will now be better understood who and what data is brought to one of them to ask: -)

13.02.2011 2:13, Peter Khramov:

Now on the pages of species available for more information about who is involved in the formation of materials: Under the "system" indicates the user who made the form into the database of the site and moderators validate and activate it under 'description and attributes "and" subspecies "- users who have made the appropriate information.Information about the photographers are specified in the same way as before.

13.02.2011 0:42, Peter Khramov:

Now, in the side under "Latest updates" the first four blocks - This latest update types, and the last, the fifth block - Last updated subspecies with a link to the page of the parent species.

13.02.2011 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to C. naruenensis, "uncertain".

13.02.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.02.2011 0:15, Peter Khramov:

Now the building blocks in the enumeration types (for example, in the catalog, the latest updates, etc.) are displayed also data about the author and year of description, as well as the length of the front wing butterfly (if information is available on the website).

12.02.2011 23:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Should be moved to eximia.

12.02.2011 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Good. Correctly handle all of the options, so I have no objections.

12.02.2011 22:06, Peter Khramov:

The level of families / subfamilies - faunaeur.org, uroved genera / species - a catalog of blue.

12.02.2011 19:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suggestion: this one is not C. umbritica. Mine (#4309 shot) looked absolutely different when I found it.

12.02.2011 18:56, Evgeny Komarov:

A. Matov identified this shot for me not 100% sure too. Can be also naruenensis.

12.02.2011 16:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Round and square brackets with each other are not connected.

12.02.2011 16:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

In parentheses the author and the year is written in the event that it has been described in another way. The brackets are set, if you do not know exactly the year of description, author, and they are based on indirect evidence.

12.02.2011 16:19, Peter Khramov:

And yet, one has at hand is a guide to zoonomenklature - version with brackets Hübner, [1820] has the right to life and it should be also in parentheses necessarily (Hübner, [1820])?

12.02.2011 16:15, Peter Khramov:

Question to all: now doing system to Basil that he could bring additional information to the species. As the size now online taken to indicate the length of the wing (as a progressive model), but many sources have scale, but there is the length of the wing.As schiat whether to add a separate scale, so that you can look in the directory along the length of the wing - in species where it is listed, and you can - in scale, where there is infa in scope? Or deficit of information on the length of the wing is exaggerated?

12.02.2011 16:08, Peter Khramov:

Foty suffered all kinds and activated.
Regarding subspecies - the fact that they lie in fairly deep, and though the form for which there are new subspecies is to be updated, it goes out quickly, and does not stand out in any way, that this is the sub-species. Meanwhile, Dmitry already loaded them very much, and this is where something has to be shown.Maybe do a slightly different version, not as it is now (there is one little idea), but for the time being - at least let it be so.
Everything else - in the process.

12.02.2011 16:03, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, "uncertain".

12.02.2011 16:03, Peter Khramov:

To go.

12.02.2011 16:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.02.2011 16:01, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

12.02.2011 16:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.02.2011 16:00, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved to H. gyrex.

12.02.2011 15:59, Peter Khramov:

Moved to H. losa.

12.02.2011 15:59, Peter Khramov:

Species activated, shot moved.

12.02.2011 15:58, Peter Khramov:

To go.

12.02.2011 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.02.2011 15:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.02.2011 15:52, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain".

12.02.2011 15:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are some comments of Oleg Pekarsy from molbiol.ru:
barko
Member
Hungary, Budapest
02.02.2011 18:00 URL #119
There is Cucullia naruenensis from Astrakhan at lepidoptera.pro
Shot by: Evgeny Komarov, http://lepidoptera.pro/species/cucullia-umbratica/.

12.02.2011 15:51, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved, species activated.

12.02.2011 15:51, Peter Khramov:

To go to A. muscipilosa.

12.02.2011 15:50, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

12.02.2011 15:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 13:43 12.02.2011
"Andrei is one option - go satire Nymphalidae subfamily. "

But we have come to like the catalog Sineva where satire own! Honestly - satire Nymphalidae me too badly strain! There's such a "Solyanka " formed! And of blues Riodinidae in independent family must return !!!

12.02.2011 14:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, 12.02.2011 11:40 - Yes, they have successfully removed moderation! A carry - it's not me! You, by the way, it is better to provide links to specific pictures - convenient moment to realize that we are about!

12.02.2011 14:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3239/ - picture a thousand years in the directory! What is uncertain is stuck in?

12.02.2011 13:47, Peter Khramov:

Uncertain.

12.02.2011 13:44, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved. Better to comment expansion on the species description page. All right then...

12.02.2011 13:43, Peter Khramov:

Andrew is one of the options - satire are Nymphalidae subfamily.

12.02.2011 13:31, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 13:31, Evgeny Komarov:

To "uncertain"!

12.02.2011 13:23, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 13:14, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 13:11, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 13:10, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 13:09, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 13:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Hylesia gyrex, Dyar, 1913.

12.02.2011 12:58, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 12:57, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 12:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Letis iphianasse.

12.02.2011 12:56, Andrey Ponomarev:

Sorry but found esche.Satyridae (satyrinae, satire) placed in the Nymphalidae.

12.02.2011 12:54, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 12:53, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 12:51, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 12:48, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 12:48, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 11:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene hohlatok yesterday look (sort Hemiceras and Colax). Alexander determined yesterday (perhaps it is time to transfer).

12.02.2011 11:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Again I remind about the need for "cleaning " species "on the moderation ":

Charanyca Esper, 1785 - Andrey Ponomarev http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=447218 - it's not the sort and kind. Similarly - next. Both sorts in the database directory for a long time and there.
Colotois Linnaeus, 1761 - Andrey Ponomarev http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=445959
Schrankia costaestrigalis Stephens, 1834 - Andrey Ponomarev http://www.faunaeur.org/index.php This double hovering here for unclear reasons. It has long been included in the catalog.
I remind you, that is.k. tangle - bump and begin to remember - what it's doing here!

12.02.2011 11:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We have to give the ability to edit your own comment!
Sometimes it is written, and only then comes: something I wrote that? And there is no opportunity to correct!

12.02.2011 11:04, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 11:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Approve and add genus.

12.02.2011 10:53, Evgeny Komarov:

There it is: http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Notodontidae/Notodontidae2/Guy%2002388s3.jpg. Amaricampa muscipilosa, (Dognin, 1916).

12.02.2011 10:40, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 10:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve Citheronia phoronea (Cramer, 1779)!

12.02.2011 10:31, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 10:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! Set "uncertain", please.

12.02.2011 10:27, Evgeny Komarov: The species is added to the database/approved.

12.02.2011 10:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Last night did not go, so the answer to all the morning.
As for dividing a service partition on the topic - with both hands!
As for the Russian language - too! Hence, the ability to edit their own comments highly relevant!
I will press the button!

12.02.2011 7:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Explain, please, why output "Fresh subspecies " on the home page and due to this to reduce the number of the latest updates to three? I see no sense in it.

12.02.2011 0:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Synonyms, Peter. Definitely. Diacrysia tutti need to drag to the Diacrysia stenochrysis, and Diacrysia tutti as a separate clean: http://www.fugleognatur.dk/wildaboutdenmark/speciesintro.asp?ID=14652&dkname=Diachrysia%20stenochrysis&latin=Diachrysia%20stenochrysis
And yet full of the sort.

12.02.2011 0:27, Peter Khramov:

Goes to conspirata.

12.02.2011 0:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to N. spini.

12.02.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

So. Pancake. If I understand correctly, the first in the database was tutti, then added Vasily stenochrysis synonymous with tutti (by the way, you need to specify a fully sinoinmy, as in the example when loading the form - ie Diacrysia tutti, and not just tutti), then Evgeny view adopted, and everyone is happy. If it is true synonyms, argued that a new kind of do not need, and you have to drag it to the old one.If you are not synonymous - then let's find out what it is ...

12.02.2011 0:16, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This is spini.

12.02.2011 0:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Already settled. Peter, thank you, the soul comforted!

12.02.2011 0:11, Peter Khramov:

There is a feeling that we should have zababahivat service partition with the division into themes, and do not write all in one topic. To messages on various topics are not lost. What do you think?

12.02.2011 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What people say about: Diacrysia stenochrysis (Warren, 1913) (= tutti Kostrovicki, 1961). That's right? The question for a long time to decide on the site should be with them.

12.02.2011 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Oak, then simply inactive.

12.02.2011 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

12.02.2011 0:03, Eugene Karolinskiy:

About kind Satyrium: it has Nearctic type species. And by the time describe him precedence over Nordmannia. Ie as a result of (any!) kind of crushing Satyrium some (probably only severoamerianskie) types it will inevitably remain. So it is possible, and their appearance on the site.

12.02.2011 0:02, Peter Khramov:

Moved to D. stenochrysis.

12.02.2011 0:01, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

12.02.2011 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2011 23:58, Eugene Karolinskiy:

About kind Satyrium: it has Nearctic type species. And by the time describe him precedence over Nordmannia. Ie as a result of (any!) kind of crushing Satyrium some (probably only severoamerianskie) types it will inevitably remain. So it is possible, and their appearance on the site.

11.02.2011 23:57, Peter Khramov:

Who did for Evgeny Komarov and Dmitry special knopitsu to automatically send comments to fote that, well, kind of made / approved. So I was able to quickly priattachivat foty to the types and kinds of activated.Sottvetstvenno please to Dmitry and Evgeny do not be lazy to press a button, and all - kick the above mentioned moderators if button press will not))
Regarding slashes - Now look.

11.02.2011 23:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The topic is not visible, but can be seen on the home page.

11.02.2011 23:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Speaking of quotes: You can sdelt so that "slash slash " did not affix a gun. Or is it fixed?

11.02.2011 23:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Finished genus just now (what managed to find out). Waiting for approval.

11.02.2011 23:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hemiceras losa (Druce, 1890).

11.02.2011 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's right, some wrongs.

11.02.2011 22:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Gresham try to improve. . Petr rights often write like chatting, half the letters in the wrong order. Chat siyuminuten, and here to stay.

11.02.2011 22:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen, I propose to discuss the topic of the Russian language on the site. Thought about the following:
Curve Russian, typos and errors → just spoils the site and turned away from him because people →Site includes commentary, something for all to follow impossible to rule lazy, and probably correctly in relation to the author of the comment → let us even though we who have access to this topic, try to make less mistakes and typos, do not be lazy to put the commas with spaces big letters there,where relevant → full of happiness it would be necessary to use "Russian / French" quotes instead of "lazy / programmer " and a decent long dash - instead of cons, but to go into non-standard characters to be, too, so I will try to adjust for such soft character because AutoCorrect →errors are often found after the fact, it will be another reason to make the system of editing their kommentov → with all of this, I am aware that I vybeshivaet wrong / lazy letter more than a normal person, so putting forward this topic for discussion, one of who against, etc.In general, all kinds of comments are welcome.
And no offense, what if ...

11.02.2011 22:36, Alexandr Zhakov:

http://www.papillon-poitou-charentes.org/ancien/Guyane_Notodontidae/pages/Noc0038_Guyane.htm.

11.02.2011 22:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hemiceras metallescens (Schaus, 1905).

11.02.2011 22:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hemiceras conspirata, Schaus, 1905.

11.02.2011 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clear. Peter, these are scattered Diacrysia as expected. Tutti in synonyms from Stenochrysis (you can kind of clean up), chrysitis only one picture really is. Peace does not, naturally. Quote of the Systematic List of the Noctuoidea of ​​Europe (Notodontidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae, Lymantriidae, Erebidae, Micronoctuidae, and Noctuidae): stenochrysis (WARREN, 1913) (= tutti KOSTROWICKI, 1961)

11.02.2011 22:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that's it, no doubts! Alive form is absolutely crazy, unbelievable. Adjacent genus added.

11.02.2011 22:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

There are two species, but probably, one. Colax phocus (Schaus, 1892) has different ribbons.

11.02.2011 22:01, Peter Khramov:

Then everything is OK. You've kind of got out in the list with an empty geography, as they have been activated just now, although foty were before.

11.02.2011 22:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

First wanted to identify some white Limantriidae, undetermined, and checked out Notodontidae also: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_notodontidae_1.htm.

11.02.2011 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So knackered... Sure, Notodontidae!

11.02.2011 21:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sorry, Noctuidae.

11.02.2011 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Notodontidae, will add genus now. So Alexander, did you find it out? My brain is totally collapsed.

11.02.2011 21:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Colax apulus, [Cramer,1776].

11.02.2011 21:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Colax apulus, [Cramer,1776].

11.02.2011 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Frankly I do not remember, look crawled

11.02.2011 21:27, Peter Khramov:

Strange. These views were not in the catalog for some reason today, and I posted them there. Thus geography was not theirs. Are you sure you previously drove to geography?

11.02.2011 21:26, Peter Khramov:

Andrew, as I also pointed out above, that yes, indeed, on the fauna is another option. But protivopsotavil Fauna catalog Sineva plus funet. The difference between 7 and 10 pages, I think, not very much about what he's talking (still not 700 and 1000), but in combination with those two sources ...

11.02.2011 20:43, Andrey Ponomarev:

On fauna europea (http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=438939) Epinotia brunnichana /

11.02.2011 20:04, Andrey Ponomarev:

Well as it is true.

11.02.2011 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Gluck was again, or what? Region flew two butterflies: Idalus carinosa and Chionarctia nivea (corrected).

11.02.2011 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eucereon sp. (Arctiidae). Species is hard to identify.

11.02.2011 16:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now Googling for it.
By Epinotia brunnichiana Linnaeus, 1767- 10 pages.
By Epinotia brunnichana Linnaeus, 1767- 7 pages.
On my left as is necessary on the basis of superiority :)

11.02.2011 15:33, Peter Khramov:

In blue, in the checklist and funete E. brunnichiana. On faunaeur.org - brunnichana. Generally, comments, but I inclined to think, to leave as is. If anyone has any source - Wellcome, voiced.

11.02.2011 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one should be moved to Antiblemma trogocycla, "uncertain", Hampson, 1926 (no any version).

11.02.2011 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Should be moved to Antiblemma orbiculata (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1874).

11.02.2011 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 15:03, Andrey Ponomarev:

He found a big mistake not: (Tortricidae) The species of the genus Epinotia in the database that are not in the catalog Epinotia brunnichiana Linnaeus, 1767 would be correct Epinotia brunnichana Linnaeus, 1767.

11.02.2011 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Last to move for today.

11.02.2011 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2011 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Paradaemonia samba (as 4979).

11.02.2011 14:46, Peter Khramov:

Shot leaves "undetermined".

11.02.2011 14:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2011 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.02.2011 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to L. herilia.

11.02.2011 14:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

11.02.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov:

To go.

11.02.2011 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

11.02.2011 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

11.02.2011 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

11.02.2011 14:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 14:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:54, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:53, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Tachyphyle albisparsa, Warren, 1907, "uncertain"!

11.02.2011 13:51, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:49, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

These species can be moved.

11.02.2011 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 13:20, Peter Khramov:

About Satyrium - well, I understand that this kind can generally be removed because no species for it and never will be? Or they may still be in the future? He can not be complete synonymous Nordmannia ...

11.02.2011 13:17, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to P. goeldii.

11.02.2011 10:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and deal with these two types:
http://lepidoptera.ru/species/diachrysia-chrysitis/
http://lepidoptera.ru/species/diachrysia-tutti/
Based on the comments (there is quite rude gaffe).
Diachrysia stenochrysis Warren, 1913 yet in the database, and it must only be activated.

11.02.2011 10:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I'm giving birth to the tropics, it is time to carry slipped.

11.02.2011 10:02, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

11.02.2011 9:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Guess, it can be signed as Protambulyx goeldii (Roth.& Jord., 1903).

11.02.2011 9:44, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! With Satyrium / Nordmannia coped! Take away Satyrium from / base synonyms.

11.02.2011 6:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Excellent! We assume that reached a consensus on the issue of systematic framework site.

11.02.2011 5:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

With regard to non-Russian (particularly Guyana) today identified a moth on a resource: http://www.guianensis.fr/index.htm and concluded that the Fauna Europea not an option in such cases (it is not there). Sites such can not be ignored (did not see an alternative) in similar, severe cases need any source of information. Concerning the directory and Sinev funet.fi agree polnoystyu.At about the Opera (my primary browser), I want to advise: after downloading a comment to unwind back at the two clicks and then update (re-loading will not be): I attack myself from time to time on the rake and led pattern.

11.02.2011 4:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Berberodes conchylata, Guenée, [1858].

11.02.2011 0:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Okay :)

11.02.2011 0:44, Peter Khramov:

Hmm. Looks like the window is switched off in the settings ... chtol summary about repeat a message:
1. Fixed. But it will take time.
2. In addition, remove all duplicates
3.It is not corrected (and as will be ready - will post news), so as not to stumble a hundred times a rake - if you post it comments, the page does not update the Update button or F5, and in the address bar of the browser - that is, to poke the mouse and press the Enter key or the corresponding button in the browser.I understand that perverted, but the situation is not correct - it is the most painless option.According to the classification - I have suggested in a comment to one of the photons (correctly Alexander says - the main thing that it was clear what principles built the system on the site, and if it was somewhere outdated - fixable), and so is duplicated here that everyone knew:
The basis of (historical, 2007) - O. Karsholt, J. Razowski (eds.), 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a distributional chacklist.There are growing ears of most European species on the site (in the catalog or in the database). At the moment, we agree that according to the Russian types of focus primarily on directory Sineva & Co., 2008. On a non-Russian, as well as a second major source - Fauna Europea. The third extra and I think the most pop - funet.fi (on the safe side). Essno, all this is subject to adjustments, but as a base - the above.
OK?

11.02.2011 0:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

Alexander Zhakov, 04-02-2011 16:38
I accept any option but to only one. Knowing the rules of play is much easier :). For a site lepidoptera.ru accept systematics of 2008. The blue catalog for Euro-Asian species. Enough for me, I do not know about others.

11.02.2011 0:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Eugene Caroline, 23:51 10.02.2011 - On the pursuit of global internetresursami. Maybe I'm too modest considering the prospects of the site, but my belief is that the view that its main purpose is the fauna of Russia and neighboring countries.Tropical and other - is good, exotic and interesting! It attracts visitors, fans, etc. But! When available primarily human resources in all that there, we'll just have to plagiarize and compiling of foreign resources, as a pale semblance of a regional site (though the same Guyana).I did not call to abandon the exotic! But the main focus - our fauna. And here is the chances of a decent life can be. Only need the most "drag " here specialists (both professional and amateur). And hence arises - what to take necessary domestic taxonomy (for which too, not just to keep up).And for the exotic - it does not matter. Options enough.
I agree with Clause 3 - Redundancy "trash " in the comments is undeniable - it is precisely nobody needs and uninteresting.

10.02.2011 23:51, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Hi! :) My 3 pennies.

1) As of systematics. IMHO, there definitely will not be a perfect solution, mainly because of the universally coverage. Is that if you take the Tree of life.It should be borne in mind that if you take an online resource such as Fauna Europaea, or Tree of Life, so keep them still have to!They are developing, there is the desire to be at the leading edge of the taxonomy, things change periodically (we are faced with this experience of our Kharkiv pages, which tried to be on the Fauna Europaea - fear and terror, especially in the ever-changing classification Noctuoidea, which shuffled the family / subfamily ). So I do not even know what to advise ...If the site was at least Palearctic, then clearly catalog Sineva (until the next edition, you can relax ... :). And so - I do not know, defects and inconsistencies eventually climb.

2) Technical: Yes, the browser (I have IE) does not ask whether the update - stupidly re-sculpts comment if accidentally upgrade.3) As for the comments, IMHO, it would be worth any hassle and technical flood deleted. Why are they users of the website? Only if there are any serious differences over the definition of - then you can leave "to determine ".

10.02.2011 23:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes if asked !? Of course not. My Opera (note a).

10.02.2011 23:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Not clearly seen, so it has "uncertain" status...

10.02.2011 23:38, Eugene Karolinskiy:

There we can see antennas from outside are slightly colored red. Anyway, Vlad saw more (shooting or even catching), if identified it like this. ;)

10.02.2011 23:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

There we can see antennas from outside are slightly colored red. Anyway, Vlad saw more (shooting or even catching), if identified it like this. ;)

10.02.2011 23:35, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Just for the record: what should be considered that is butterfly's antennas from outside (even though usually it's hardly seen just the smallest part at the end of an antenna). Lineola has dark ones, sylvestris does red. And the moustache is colored more or less similarly, males have red or something like, females do dark. Also, males can be easily identified by stigmas.

10.02.2011 23:16, Peter Khramov:

Ok, synonym added then. Meant, this... God, genetic combination.

10.02.2011 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, when you press Update, the browser does not ask whether to send the data again, just update?

10.02.2011 23:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Uy as got repetitive messages! I'm used to on other sites to reap "update " to see - there are any new page ... Here again fell.

10.02.2011 23:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Look at the kinds of "on the moderation "! There has long been hanging born Colotois Linnaeus, 1761 - Andrey Ponomarev, now reappeared race Charanyca Esper, 1785 - Andrey Ponomarev. Something or Andrew tupit or website (most -first).
Immediately reminded of the need to eliminate the double - Schrankia costaestrigalis Stephens, 1834.This kind of a long time in the catalog! Establishments in search - two results!
Why come to Satyrium eximia Fixsen, 1887 - how to claim Satyrium, or introduce race Nordmannia, transferring to all of Satyrium? It is not so much to Peter, one last question, as to the society!If we take as a basis for Russia and neighboring territories catalog blue, let's - confirm the agreement and more in the transfer of species here or there will not be a question to ask. Do not keep silent, gentlemen. I for Northern Eurasia for the catalog. It is not without sin, but there is an Internet resource covering all our territory - will discrepancies.

10.02.2011 23:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Look at the kinds of "on the moderation "! There has long been hanging born Colotois Linnaeus, 1761 - Andrey Ponomarev, now reappeared race Charanyca Esper, 1785 - Andrey Ponomarev. Something or Andrew tupit or website (most -first).
Immediately reminded of the need to eliminate the double - Schrankia costaestrigalis Stephens, 1834.This kind of a long time in the catalog! Establishments in search - two results!
Why come to Satyrium eximia Fixsen, 1887 - how to claim Satyrium, or introduce race Nordmannia, transferring to all of Satyrium? It is not so much to Peter, one last question, as to the society!If we take as a basis for Russia and neighboring territories catalog blue, let's - confirm the agreement and more in the transfer of species here or there will not be a question to ask. Do not keep silent, gentlemen. I for Northern Eurasia for the catalog. It is not without sin, but there is an Internet resource covering all our territory - will discrepancies.

10.02.2011 22:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suits and button make for uncertain species to mayaknut could carry when in certain.

10.02.2011 22:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 22:07 10.02.2011
"In such cases it will be necessary to blind editing system with a limited duration. Who thinks that? "

Bezrybe ... :) good!

10.02.2011 22:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Boris Vitalyevich defines it as Polyommatus (Plebecula) thersites.

10.02.2011 22:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

letters I do not see everything, but you're talking about commas !!

10.02.2011 22:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will add genus now.

10.02.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Polyommatus, "uncertain". Moderators should decide if new genus needed.

10.02.2011 22:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be moved to "uncertain". Just added genus today (being moderated now).

10.02.2011 22:21, Peter Khramov:

There is not written, "Dmitry, said by e-mail" and "Dmitri responded by mail." Commas - is not useless, but -)

10.02.2011 22:19, Peter Khramov:

And this is also: why approve if no species yet?

10.02.2011 22:19, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, why approve if there is no species databased or approved yet?

10.02.2011 22:18, Peter Khramov:

"Database of Russian species — catalog" meant the Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia.

10.02.2011 22:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! mail received nothing.

10.02.2011 22:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved to P. phyllides.

10.02.2011 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not remember: tady deleted.

10.02.2011 22:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Think, this is Plebicula thersites (Cartener, [1835]), Evgeny is right. English (LepIndex) say:
Scientific Name of Taxon: thersites Original Rank: ?
Current Status: Valid Name Current Rank: SPECIES
Original Combination: AGRIADES ! Cantener, 1834
Comments:
Original Description Reference:
Current valid name:
Current Valid Name: PLEBICULA thersites
Comments:
Current Name Reference:

10.02.2011 22:07, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, you lyapnesh in a hurry, you will answer, because someone else will answer, then you will delete comments, and the responses will hang in the air. They all chtol delete? I understand, to throw doubles ... On the other hand, yes, it happens, stupidly wrong write or something. For such cases, it will be necessary to blind editing system with a limited duration.Who thinks that?
Basil, this phot already published on the site.

10.02.2011 22:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 22:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 22:04, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 22:04, Peter Khramov:

Suggest consider this catalog as a default and thus have such system as: website database — checklist (as it's already set), database of Russian species — catalog (guess, this one is not perfect but as a main source is rather acceptable, and you always are free to correct anything), for non-Russian species and also as an alternative database — Fauna Europaea.

10.02.2011 21:59, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry answered by mail. Moved to lineola.

10.02.2011 21:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Guys! I'm not long in these! But what about #1543 and #4640 pics then??? As I can see, this one has red moustache.

10.02.2011 21:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Let's take Synev classification as a default one for these lands. There Agrodiaetus is considered as a Polyommatus subgenus. So, let's skip genus, and wait for subgenera to clear this (now genus/subgenus is rather subjective).

10.02.2011 21:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Well, finally the opportunity to make editing / removal of comments! Lyapnesh in a hurry, and then ... Well, I do not like their own gaffes on the audience :) But joking aside: Basil is right - it is a lot of extra pages of comments on the kind of short-term, ie flood climbs. Do not need them (even for the history of the site).

10.02.2011 21:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, where I downloaded the Nymphalidae these same two ways to illustrate the catalog look. Not what species Not applicable (peacock and admiral), decide if he will go. Painfully moment with copper-butterfly liked :)

10.02.2011 21:28, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 21:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve Satyrium eximia! But there is no Satyrium genus in the Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia. This is the same Nordmannia genus. Q: what we consider as a default, this catalog or? If yes, I will add genus.

10.02.2011 21:17, Peter Khramov:

Dear gentlemen moderators, please, approve the species in the database if agree. Meh, what a good life people do live keeping some car catalogs, or, say, toilets. Model U-WR4811 will be always U-WR4811 till the end of its life, no more, no less. Unhappily, we are so different.

10.02.2011 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yep, Russian Far East, should be moved. Just added genus.

10.02.2011 21:14, Peter Khramov:

Uh-oh... I'm dummie. Moving.

10.02.2011 21:13, Peter Khramov:

Right now Boris has semiargusov to load, so the problem is solved very quickly, frankly)

10.02.2011 21:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Satyrium eximia.

10.02.2011 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I meant that should be moved to identified.

10.02.2011 21:06, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Dmitry, consensus needed. How can it be sylvestris? ;) Stigma is thin, interrupted, antennas are dark from outside...

10.02.2011 21:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Go and so my (probably tomorrow, you still carry some of neoprene.). I am watching my phot with copper-butterfly in classifying them illustrated, and in fact for fun :) uploaded

10.02.2011 21:02, Peter Khramov:

Just for the record, quoted were this small hero thoughts, not mine...

10.02.2011 20:58, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the point is that it all goes as comments (as now confirm the definition of loyalty), but activated at the touch of a button, and always the same, and formulated with backlight.

10.02.2011 20:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's it, male.

10.02.2011 20:47, Peter Khramov:

"Is anybody here?.."

10.02.2011 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Case govorish, yeah, and the commentary is cluttered with unnecessary photos.

10.02.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Lord, but is not it time to pile button on the photo "It's time suffered Fautua" - say, the kind already exists in the database and approved, and the photo has not yet been fixed? It is useful primarily Modera Eugene and Dmitry, and other active juzverej can be useful. What do you think?

10.02.2011 20:24, Peter Khramov:

This time, the author pictures - Nikolai Vladimirov, and objects - moths and caterpillars.

10.02.2011 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually, shouldn't: just added nominative.

10.02.2011 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, should be moved.

10.02.2011 18:56, Peter Khramov:

Boris, thanks for approving. Photo moved.

10.02.2011 18:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Boris, thanks! I put it as icarus, but now we have the first semiargus, well :)

10.02.2011 18:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

From all kind of all there are 2 types: D. crysitis-1 photos and D. stenochrysis-rest, and tutti is synonymous stenohrizisa (like the kind you can remove). Look comments. And I'm still kind of "posobirat " for the determination of the tropics.

10.02.2011 18:10, Boris Stradomsky:

Left one is Cyaniris semiargus, cause G. alexis hind wings underside is widely colored light blue from inside, no less that half of it, also its submarginal row of hindwing spots is differently positioned.

10.02.2011 17:57, Peter Khramov:

In the sense - photos or species? What do you mean?

10.02.2011 17:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, loans originally Diachrysia-we need to understand them correctly.

10.02.2011 17:17, Peter Khramov:

Lots of icarus and no semiargus at all. Let's wait for other suggestions...

10.02.2011 17:13, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes.

10.02.2011 17:12, Peter Khramov:

Ok, if male, so male...

10.02.2011 17:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

10.02.2011 17:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

10.02.2011 17:10, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved. Dear approving gentlemen, please, approve also the very identifying, if it's successful, right after species, for me to move it finally...

10.02.2011 17:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To move. And that's all for today, I hope.

10.02.2011 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To move to Rhescyntis hippodamia (Cramer, [1777]).

10.02.2011 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To move.

10.02.2011 17:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To move too.

10.02.2011 17:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To move (approved).

10.02.2011 16:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let's leave P. icarus and move if somebody approves C. semiargus. Ambiguous shot anyway. If you only saw how patient and insistent he was :)

10.02.2011 16:41, Peter Khramov:

If it's really semiargus, that's cool cause it has no pictures yet, I'd move to that.... Approvals/suggestions more?

10.02.2011 16:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Left is not Glaucopsyche alexis but Cyaniris semiargus (Rottemburg, 1775), but don't know this.

10.02.2011 15:39, Peter Khramov:

Well, funet is surely good general source, but is not God anyway...

10.02.2011 15:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Should be: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/polyommatus/index.html#

10.02.2011 15:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Already Polyommatus: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/polyommatinae/polyommatus/index.html#phyllides phyllides.

10.02.2011 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wasn't sure what genus and species it was, sorry :)

10.02.2011 14:41, Peter Khramov:

=Polyommatus thersites?

10.02.2011 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, Evgeny, if nobody objects, please, add and approve this species.

10.02.2011 14:15, Eugene Davkaev:

May be Plebecula thersites (Cartener, [1835]), Lycaenidae.

10.02.2011 9:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Tatyana! This one was identified by Evgeny Tsvetkov (Saint Petersburg), who always identifies all my Geometridae. As far as I know, his suggestions are reliable enough. And he always doubts openly.

10.02.2011 9:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Meh! This is not mine ;)! Tatyana, sorry, I've just got similar shot there, so commented this one automatically.

10.02.2011 9:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Tatyana! I also as a rookie in Geometridae considered this like Scopula, but Evgeny Tsevtkov (Saint Petersburg) identified it right. He always checks all my photos.

10.02.2011 9:10, Eugene Davkaev:

This species is identified by Sergey Toropov as Agrodiaetus phyllides (Staudinger, 1886) - Lycaenidae.

10.02.2011 9:09, Tatyana Gordeeva:

I'm sorry, still rather Scopula tessellaria...

10.02.2011 9:02, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 9:01, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Looks rather like S.umbelaria Hb. ...

10.02.2011 8:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 8:56, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 8:27, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Maybe, Aplocera plagiata L. which is named such by Vyidalepp (1998) in the mountains of Middle Asia.

10.02.2011 8:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

10.02.2011 8:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Website of Parnassius genus (imho, nice):
http://goran.waldeck.se/paindex.htm.

10.02.2011 0:42, Peter Khramov:

Yeah, published uzho ...

10.02.2011 0:40, Peter Khramov:

A friendly wave with photos tails pakemony mustache tightened in capes and hussars. Wellcome to the gallery ...

09.02.2011 23:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vote plus: let's move already.

09.02.2011 23:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I found an old silvikolu in lux is with the underside, look.

09.02.2011 23:08, Peter Khramov:

Yevgeny Komarov, gave birth to a list of transfer, respectively, I have now moved them. If someone suddenly noticed any mistakes in these families - reported.

09.02.2011 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will upload tomorrow (think I have some in a collection).

09.02.2011 22:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 22:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved then. Bad that was identified wrongly, no any silvicola underside there...

09.02.2011 22:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Diachrysia stenochrysis, Warren, 1913 !!!

09.02.2011 22:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Agree!

09.02.2011 22:37, Peter Khramov:

List users with access to this thread updated.

09.02.2011 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

09.02.2011 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to "identified successfully".

09.02.2011 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Created for race photo: # 5051 It is necessary to adopt and translate.

09.02.2011 19:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To move.

09.02.2011 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Time to move.

09.02.2011 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Created race Rhescyntis for photo # 4989. It was created by: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/bombycoidea/saturniidae/arsenurinae/rhescyntis/index.html It is necessary to adopt and translate.

09.02.2011 19:19, Evgeny Komarov:

"Who commented last"? Me! Was logged off from the website while making a comment, so that happened to be anonymous :)

09.02.2011 19:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Let's move to sp., maybe there will be expert in Kazakhstan Geometridae.

09.02.2011 19:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 18:34, Peter Khramov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog/?more=&less=&photo=0&perpage=50&order=cou Actually, it's funny that the swallowtail lead with nemerenno margin (twice the difference with the cabbage, which is in second place).

09.02.2011 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Properly done (subspecies there is the place).

09.02.2011 18:32, Peter Khramov:

Figase as Dmitry subspecies bloat (infa on the main page).

09.02.2011 18:06, Peter Khramov:

Where are you, consensus?

09.02.2011 18:06, Peter Khramov:

Female moved.

09.02.2011 18:05, Peter Khramov:

Male moved.

09.02.2011 18:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved and activated.

09.02.2011 18:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.02.2011 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Pop label (shown if Hovering the cursor over the photo) for some images displayed incorrectly. Now the situation is corrected - you can see the Latin name or a message stating that the form of the butterfly in the photo is not defined.

09.02.2011 17:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Should be moved.

09.02.2011 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus and species added and approved, time to move.

09.02.2011 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Don't know, who, but also think it's Lonomia sp. (can't name the species): http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Lonomia.htm.

09.02.2011 17:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

UPS: not wipe (left, with the following comments).

09.02.2011 17:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The previous photo also should be moved. Genus added and approved.

09.02.2011 17:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it is better to wipe it. There, I sent you a letter with the screen, look. It is necessary to fix it if possible.

09.02.2011 17:08, Peter Khramov:

If doubtful, can be "uncertain" thus. If not, I will move that to Aplocera sp. after it will be possible to use superspecies there...

09.02.2011 17:06, Peter Khramov:

Who commented last?

09.02.2011 17:06, Peter Khramov:

Well, the long and the longest link. Nothing much trouble, let it be. By the way, the proposal - the people, when you talk to a number of photos the sight to see this picture, copy the address of the page at once, ie, no # 4992 and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4992/ - Well, it will be faster and more convenient. And if so just mention, if possible, and the number for the sake of brevity, but speed trap ...

09.02.2011 15:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Back!!! ;) This is lineola! Solid!

09.02.2011 14:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter technical question today had to put a link to a very long photo # 4992. Look how ugly beds. Something 'tweak "can to a normal bear a? Or daring her.

09.02.2011 14:12, :

"Not sure Saturnia" is vain. I have nature shots of Lonomia, nearly one to one except one thing, some corner, or, line fracture in the apical part of a forewing. You can compare it there: http://www.dimijianimages.com/Crypsis-mimicry-page1/Lonomia.htm.

09.02.2011 13:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Same Automeris sp. Can't name the species without hind wings!

09.02.2011 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Natural History Museum (London) checklist: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/checklist.dsml. Also can be helpful.

09.02.2011 13:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Aplocera sp., Geometridae. Species is unable to identify, showed it to Geometridae expert, no way.

09.02.2011 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added Nothus genus based on http://www.nhm.ac.uk/jdsml/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/checklist.dsml?searchPageURL=index.dsml&UserID=&UserName=&sort=SCIENTIFIC_NAME_on_card&Current_superfamily=Geometroidea&Current_family=Sematuridae&Current_subfamily=&Current_tribe=&recLimit=500. So, that is Nothus lunus male, Linnaeus, 1758, and its female on #4991 photo. Both should be moved.

09.02.2011 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hey, still open question, if it belongs to Sematura genus or Nothus? http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_sematuridae.htm#Sematura lunus (hard to say). Grand dame it is, should be identified by the shot location.

09.02.2011 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yet something of Mechanitis, imho. In this case preview wouldn't be useless.

09.02.2011 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's it: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_sphingidae_1.htm.

09.02.2011 9:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Behind.

09.02.2011 6:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! Move, please, there was some definite mistake :(

09.02.2011 6:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Turan Eilicrinia subcordaria species (Herrich-Schaffer, 1852) (= anicularia Ev., 1852; = tritomata F.-W.; = freitagaria Mosch.). Expansion: from Volga region to East Kazakhstan.

09.02.2011 6:05, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 6:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Agree. Manduca vestalis (Jordan, 1917).

09.02.2011 5:38, Evgeny Komarov:

BEHIND!

09.02.2011 3:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved to parthenias.

09.02.2011 2:57, Alexandr Zhakov:

Zhenya is very meticulous, always trying to get to the truth, even by the authorities. BEHIND.

09.02.2011 2:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Archiearis parthenias (Linnaeus, 1761).

09.02.2011 0:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

behind. intelligent man - is immediately evident

09.02.2011 0:54, Peter Khramov:

Eugene said that Moder have had no time, but in the service topic he could participate. Those in favor, who is against who is quite the opposite?

09.02.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

)) aha...

09.02.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

This is also to go to pandoras.

09.02.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved to pandoras.

09.02.2011 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

09.02.2011 0:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.02.2011 0:27, Peter Khramov:

Duc, he seems to be such a desire is not expressed. But I had an interest, wondering whether it would be more tightly to participate ...

09.02.2011 0:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Approve! Carterocephalus palaemon (Pallas, 1771).

09.02.2011 0:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

09.02.2011 0:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This one is palaemon, say. Appearance and shot location.

09.02.2011 0:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And this one is sylvestris.

09.02.2011 0:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter !!!
Eugene Caroline - What's wrong with the new moderator ??

09.02.2011 0:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

If these are from Caucasus (as far as I can remember, the author is local), should be melotis ponticus then.

09.02.2011 0:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is Thymelicus lineola.

09.02.2011 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, just added to my personal page similar one, way more funny. What to do with such photos, dunno:)

09.02.2011 0:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

New species added. Move, please, these two shots.

09.02.2011 0:00, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Approve sylvestris not lineola. ;))) Hey, moderators!

08.02.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov:

Ok, throw off, I will create a family and perekinu birth.

08.02.2011 23:57, Peter Khramov:

Ok, got it.

08.02.2011 23:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Chazara enervata.

08.02.2011 23:57, Peter Khramov:

"Everybody knows those, I think", Vasily, this subj still is not strictly technical one, ordinary people can also read this...

08.02.2011 23:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Argynnis pandora.

08.02.2011 23:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Argynnis pandora.

08.02.2011 23:55, Peter Khramov:

No, no moving since no genus.

08.02.2011 23:55, Peter Khramov:

What a speed! Moved...

08.02.2011 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Namely - from Eugene Davkaeva, Zhakova Alexander, Constantine Krajewski and Elvira Izmailov.

08.02.2011 23:52, Peter Khramov:

Organized queue.

08.02.2011 23:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Chazara enervata.

08.02.2011 23:51, Peter Khramov:

There is life on Mars.

08.02.2011 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Obvious sylvestris (by antennae).

08.02.2011 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Don't worry, be happy.

08.02.2011 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Yo!

08.02.2011 23:48, Peter Khramov:

First men on the moon.

08.02.2011 23:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 20:17 08.02.2011
"On the Pyralidae / Crambidae, probably as Vlad offers (and, as I understand, there is no dissenting), it is necessary to mold as in the directory. "
Peter! Add family Crambidae - tomorrow I will throw you the names of genera, which must be transferred to it from the Pyralidae, he is not in the right :)

08.02.2011 23:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

As for me personally, I also tend to sylvestris, since the antennae are ginger. Just thought you may know few more differences.

08.02.2011 23:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry and samochki P. dardanus you do not have an hour? For clarity.

08.02.2011 23:28, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 23:17, Eugene Karolinskiy:

No, not to sylvanus. ;)

Stigma is clearly seen as well as antennae. Look through few more pictures and compare. Sylvestris.

08.02.2011 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, everybody knows those, I think, but ok, just for the record:
http://www.leps.it/
http://www.lepidoptera.pl/.

08.02.2011 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Why nobody mentioned the great and still awesome leps.it, or, lepidoptera.pl?..

08.02.2011 23:11, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, Dmitry, your turns.

08.02.2011 23:10, Peter Khramov:

To go to O. sylvanus.

08.02.2011 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved to O. sylvanus.

08.02.2011 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved to O. sylvanus, "uncertain".

08.02.2011 23:09, Peter Khramov:

To go to O. sylvanus.

08.02.2011 23:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved to O. sylvanus.

08.02.2011 22:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

"08-02-2011, Evgeny Karolinsky: This one is Th. sylvestris!"
Why not Thymelicus lineola? Though can't see clearly stigma and the antennae, if they're ginger or black. Anyway that is Thymelicus genus 100% sure.

08.02.2011 22:37, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This one is Th. sylvestris!

08.02.2011 22:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tomorrow (can't right now).

08.02.2011 22:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, tomorrow morning completed yet conceived. While only designated areas.

08.02.2011 21:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is done, surprisedly and happily.

08.02.2011 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Year changed, deleted race.

08.02.2011 21:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Let's check out Sphingidae, who is not lazy volunteer?

08.02.2011 21:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Not impossible at all to do something, and again with an Internet nakosyachil. Remove absolutely necessary, sorry: http://lepidoptera.ru/genus/commaculata/
None of this kind of nature.

08.02.2011 21:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

New species added, correct, please, the year, should be 1905.

08.02.2011 21:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, born Acraga I did only a year for the kind of mistake. We must improve on 1905

08.02.2011 21:02, Peter Khramov:

Well, then, and it will work as a human in the future. Lighter.

08.02.2011 21:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just a moment.

08.02.2011 20:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Piotr, try now. If that completed yet in the morning. Inet hrenovato as always in the evening. Oh, and the system itself to the level of Swiss watches licked ..... Provider future for me :)

08.02.2011 20:47, Peter Khramov:

Waiting for a new species in the database.

08.02.2011 20:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.02.2011 20:45, Peter Khramov:

Manteau is shot from every angle!

08.02.2011 20:44, Peter Khramov:

Vasily note is now activated a new species, respectively, they will have an empty geography (the full list is always relevant to the page that I would send to you).

08.02.2011 20:43, Peter Khramov:

Small elephantus goes to M. clarissa females.

08.02.2011 20:42, Peter Khramov:

Wheee, serious stuff!

08.02.2011 20:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bah, even genitalia there: http://butterfliesofamerica.com/t/Mnasitheus_chrysophrys_a.htm (this one is for ones who are suckers for) :). Curious source, in my mind.

08.02.2011 20:40, Peter Khramov:

Whoa, greens to come.

08.02.2011 20:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

08.02.2011 20:38, Peter Khramov:

There was a 99% and was 99.5%. But I have an example, of course, provocative. Now's look at your foty who confirmed Eugene. Comes user sees Fautua. To her assigned appearance. The user is not required to know the skill level determines, and high-level errors are possible. And here - hop, confirmation by a second person.This greatly adds to the credibility of the information. Ie such confirmation - not useless, and at the same time, no one interferes.Therefore, if you can confirm the "well-defined" foty confirms - it will only be a plus, and no hard feelings - there is not the confidence Eugene to Dmitry, and the amount of information that gets any, permanent or not, the user site on a page photo or views.

08.02.2011 20:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And this one.

08.02.2011 20:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And this one.

08.02.2011 20:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Found that too (should try): http://butterfliesofamerica.com/.

08.02.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And this one, please.

08.02.2011 20:34, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, done.

08.02.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Move this one, please.

08.02.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Perola villosipes.

08.02.2011 20:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Perola villosipes.

08.02.2011 20:34, Peter Khramov:

Added.

08.02.2011 20:33, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

08.02.2011 20:33, Peter Khramov:

To go to doris.

08.02.2011 20:32, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.02.2011 20:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Acraga infusa "uncertain".

08.02.2011 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Approving?

08.02.2011 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it's all about not money but aid, for sure ))

08.02.2011 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Guys, add and approve a new species, please...

08.02.2011 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Wha?

08.02.2011 20:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Acraga infusa "uncertain".

08.02.2011 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Queer fish in manteau moved to P. villosipes.

08.02.2011 20:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thus I can identify every thing there....... to the order.

08.02.2011 20:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved to females. Will activate genus.

08.02.2011 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Finally, final or "undetermined" still?

08.02.2011 20:28, Peter Khramov:

Moved to fellows.

08.02.2011 20:27, Peter Khramov:

Moved to D. plexippus.

08.02.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

08.02.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

There! Moving then.

08.02.2011 20:25, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved, new Morpho genus activated.

08.02.2011 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Ok, photo moved, species activated.

08.02.2011 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved to males.

08.02.2011 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

08.02.2011 20:22, Peter Khramov:

See, how it's good when everything put to Nymphalidae. Can be sure at least of a family ;--)

08.02.2011 20:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

08.02.2011 20:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

At least three specialists have identified three hives banal - worst of excess confirm certainly will not.
What's the point ???

08.02.2011 20:19, Peter Khramov:

Yes, and more. On the question of whether or not to confirm the identification of the exact species. I think we need to confirm any. At least three specialists have identified three hives banal - worst of excess confirm certainly will not. And to think in advance where there is anyone doubt where there is no - it is harmful to health.

08.02.2011 20:17, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, a new genus everything is OK. Verification is required when you first add from the new system to look inside. And if once everything is OK, then further errors may only human, but not software.
Excess Neonerita fenestrata removed.
Regarding Pyralidae / Crambidae, probably as Vlad offers (and, as I understand, there is no dissenting), it is necessary to mold as in the catalog.

08.02.2011 20:11, Peter Khramov:

Meh, what a story. Moved again.

08.02.2011 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

08.02.2011 20:06, Peter Khramov:

There are no definitely identified species at all.

08.02.2011 19:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If it's needed to approve already identified successfully ones?

08.02.2011 19:35, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 19:34, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 19:34, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 19:34, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Two genera added.

08.02.2011 17:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If this is Saturnia (not sure though), then rather Periga genus. Lonomia is what famous of its poisonous caterpillars???

08.02.2011 17:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I removed the synonym of Morpho helenor.

08.02.2011 17:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Added born Xylophanes. Check

08.02.2011 17:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Genus and species added.

08.02.2011 17:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasily! Set Aethria, and the second one as a synonym, one may search by both! Will correct, if needed!

08.02.2011 17:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

May be even Heliconidae. Though there everything is put to Nymphalidae.

08.02.2011 17:19, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:19, Evgeny Komarov:

Ithomiidae. Further is silence as an answer...

08.02.2011 17:17, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:16, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:15, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:15, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry, add, please, genus and species.

08.02.2011 17:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve!

08.02.2011 17:13, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus is questionable, sure. What genus should it belong to?

08.02.2011 17:10, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:09, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:09, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:04, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 17:04, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 16:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Vlad damned 08.02.2011 16:40 - Here I am all about the same!

08.02.2011 16:40, Vlad Proklov:

What is happening, you can look in the Catalogue of Lepidoptera of Russia.

08.02.2011 16:38, Vlad Proklov:

N. xanthomelas for sure.

08.02.2011 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one is definite Dalceridae.

08.02.2011 16:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let's move.

08.02.2011 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 16:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that is right. Will add genus and species.

08.02.2011 15:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That's it: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_imago.htm.

08.02.2011 15:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Limacodidae Perola villosipes, (Walker, 1865), female.

08.02.2011 15:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Limacodidae Perola villosipes, (Walker, 1865), female.

08.02.2011 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

These would make out the time.

08.02.2011 14:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adjacent genus added. Also: male.

08.02.2011 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, the subspecies was: http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_04/texte/n_lecour.htm
You should not have to rename the subspecies.

08.02.2011 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

Species is ok, genera are questionable, don't know this "kilometre zero" as for tropics. Author is the same. We should choose a taxonomic system as default one.

08.02.2011 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Done (considering the last comment).

08.02.2011 13:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Approved. That is: Neonerita fenestrata - removed from the "on the moderation " - a double.

08.02.2011 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is also should be cleared: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/clystea/index.html#leucaspis. Opinions needed.

08.02.2011 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Lord, I corrected the wrong kinds of input from the status of "moderation" (those that once tried to enter the sub-species), as will the time - take a look / confirm or send info, which of them should be removed.

08.02.2011 12:19, Peter Khramov:

Dear moderators, please, add and approve this species and new other "Guyana" identified lately...

08.02.2011 12:12, Peter Khramov:

Constantine hinted that soon may even download.

08.02.2011 10:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, 08.02.2011 10:06 So I'm counting on it. Something does not respond!

08.02.2011 10:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues
Let's define some Pyralidae / Crambidae! Now Crambidae independent family. If you share, then processing it fairly. I figured only by the fact that in the catalog: 34 kinds of necessary ognevok Crambidae to endure, plus some places sininimiyu clean. And with the birth that the database without photos rake. I think that is necessary. Your opinion?

08.02.2011 10:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Lonomia ?

08.02.2011 10:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Citheronia sp. ?phoronea (Cramer, 1779)?

08.02.2011 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vlad Proklova my need to connect, silent something.

08.02.2011 9:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues
Let's define some Pyralidae / Crambidae! Now Crambidae independent family. If you share, then processing it fairly. I figured only by the fact that in the catalog: 34 kinds of necessary ognevok Crambidae to endure, plus some places sininimiyu clean. And with the birth that the database without photos rake. I think that is necessary. Your opinion?

08.02.2011 8:58, Evgeny Komarov:

These are two different families!

08.02.2011 2:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We demand yet! especially bears

08.02.2011 2:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 2:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Semaeopus subtincta, Warren, 1897.

08.02.2011 1:52, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Agyrta auxo (Linnaeus, 1767), finally.

08.02.2011 1:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agree, very noticeable. Then Linnaeus, 1767, Sphinx genus.

08.02.2011 1:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No!! micilia is rather different.

08.02.2011 1:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Approve :) Dysschema tricolor (Sulzer, 1776). http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/pericopinae/dysschema/index.html#tricolor.

08.02.2011 1:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Approve: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_arctiidae_pericopinae.htm.

08.02.2011 1:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Confusing, confused: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/agyrta/index.html#micilia. This is Agyrta micilia (Cramer, [1779]).

08.02.2011 1:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What a world! All crew is identifying not butterfly but the very author!

08.02.2011 1:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And this one is Dysschema tricolor. Approving, please???

08.02.2011 1:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok then, let it be :)

08.02.2011 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agyrta auxo, Hübner 1817: http://www.eol.org/pages/10931486, female.

08.02.2011 1:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And Hampson, 1898, also: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/noctuoidea/arctiidae/ctenuchinae/agyrta/index.html. Dunno.........

08.02.2011 1:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Think, Xylophanes titana.

08.02.2011 1:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Manduca vestalis???

08.02.2011 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Check author here: http://www.cahurel-entomologie.com/ctenuchinae.htm. Will look for it somewhere else, maybe, there are some more.

08.02.2011 1:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Will check that in a minute (damn, damn double adding comments).

08.02.2011 1:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's the very it.

08.02.2011 1:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hey, I've got it, but what about author???

08.02.2011 1:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's the very it.

08.02.2011 1:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Found author here: http://www.passions-papillons.com/Arctiidae/arctiidaeguyct.html#auxo.

08.02.2011 1:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, looks very similar to! Even red hatted. Author is Linnaeus, 1767, though.

08.02.2011 1:07, Alexandr Zhakov:

Beast done. :)

08.02.2011 1:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be, can be, looks like Aethria leucaspis flava: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_arctiidae_ctenuchini_1.htm.

08.02.2011 1:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be, can be, looks like Aethria leucaspis flava: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_arctiidae_ctenuchini_1.htm.

08.02.2011 1:04, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agyrta auxo, Hübner, 1817. http://www.cahurel-entomologie.com/images_ctenuchinae/ctenuchinae_guyane_maxi/agyrta_auxo_M.JPG.

08.02.2011 1:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Whoa! Agreed!

08.02.2011 1:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rather Aethria leucaspis (Cramer, 1775). At least, genus is sure.

08.02.2011 0:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

No, so close, but it's not, look at the venation. My suggestion is Aethria leucaspis (Cramer, 1775): http://www.cahurel-entomologie.com/texte_ctenuchinae/ctenuchinae_page4.htm.

08.02.2011 0:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If I only knew where to find these books...

08.02.2011 0:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nearly lost my vision, even in glasses, that sucks...

08.02.2011 0:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Who wants and is not lazy, can look through: http://www.flickr.com/photos/33398884@N03/4338530161/in/set-72157623249991359/.

08.02.2011 0:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That was not grease! That was aid to Cuba hard-working guys! Whatever, 1€ can't be a grease.

08.02.2011 0:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hey, why that is pulled down, huh??? The more, these two belong to different groups!!! There are two different genera, Morpho helenor (Cramer, 1776) and Morpho achilles (Linnaeus, 1758).

08.02.2011 0:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Think, this one is Arctiidae, Phoenicoprocta vacillans, Walker, 1856, or something close to (tough case): http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_arctiidae_euchromiini_2.htm.

08.02.2011 0:22, Peter Khramov:

Added photo to the genus.

08.02.2011 0:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The right one is something of Oleria genus.

08.02.2011 0:21, Peter Khramov:

Updated. Meh, corruption is everywhere...

08.02.2011 0:20, Peter Khramov:

If I've got it right, it's already classified as a Morpho helenor synonym. Then there is no need in genus, but changing the main name. So what, synonym or?

08.02.2011 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, it's still has been moderating, say, no such yet. Approving needed...

08.02.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Yes, everything is fine.

08.02.2011 0:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Yep, the start is good! Just don't forget to put a space after a comma ))

08.02.2011 0:09, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Then let's change its identifying status at least. Maybe, that's really irrelevant, the more, this one is rather worn-out. Anyway, I vote for xanthomelas. ;)

08.02.2011 0:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

What is the right one, so familiar?

08.02.2011 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 0:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Meh, afraid even good connection won't help. Tough case.

08.02.2011 0:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 0:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.02.2011 0:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be, can be (roughly speaking). Connection will presumably suck till the very morning (thanks god, this website works).

07.02.2011 23:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

I just turn it inside out, if questionable, to look at the color of its legs. Proved then. As for this one, I'd also suggest polychloros.

07.02.2011 23:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, identified right. Famous butterfly.

07.02.2011 23:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why not Mechanitis or Forbestra genera, or something else of Ithomia??

07.02.2011 23:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can't check Heliconius sp. (connection sucks), but suspect ismenius?

07.02.2011 23:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

•Philaethria!!! Added genus and species. Check it!!!!

07.02.2011 23:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Genus and species added. By the way, I was nearly arrested in Cuba cause of this one, not because of trying to catch it but crossing some private lands. 1€ saved my soul!

07.02.2011 23:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Add to Nymphalidae race Anartia. Check whether all gud ???

07.02.2011 23:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There named as Laparus doris.

07.02.2011 23:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There named as Laparus doris.

07.02.2011 23:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There named as Laparus doris.

07.02.2011 23:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eacles imperialis, Drury, 1773, again imho.

07.02.2011 23:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Added.

07.02.2011 23:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Genus added.

07.02.2011 23:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Genus added.

07.02.2011 23:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is such genus.

07.02.2011 23:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There is such genus.

07.02.2011 23:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Added Castnia invaria (genus done already). Move, please. First photo in this family! Good start.

07.02.2011 23:24, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, if free, add new taxa to the database for new pictures can be added then...

07.02.2011 23:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Antaea juturna.

07.02.2011 23:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Castnia invaria.

07.02.2011 23:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Morpho achilles.

07.02.2011 23:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Morpho achilles.

07.02.2011 23:15, Peter Khramov:

For the sake of a common understanding: it went empower moderators. Firstly, now the base may not only kurochit Eugene, but Dmitri. For toryh, both can also edit the field and author / year.Soon doleplyu addition to Basil, after which he will be able to edit not only geography, but also the size and the flight of time, and fodder plants.

07.02.2011 23:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dryas iulia.

07.02.2011 23:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heliconius doris.

07.02.2011 23:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Philaethria dido.

07.02.2011 23:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heliconius doris.

07.02.2011 23:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Heliconius doris.

07.02.2011 23:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Anartia jatrophae.

07.02.2011 23:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Danaus plexippus.

07.02.2011 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Okay, okay, there is the day it is.)

07.02.2011 23:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Delighted, pasib.

07.02.2011 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Another 33 photo Konstantin Krajewski.

07.02.2011 22:46, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Well, yes, caucasogenita turns out to be as dark as this one, admit :)

07.02.2011 22:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

Too high for that, shot it more that 2000 m above sea-level. Also too late.

07.02.2011 22:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Hm... There, on the 2nd upper photo in the right row you can see similar triangles, and this is the very хanthomelas: http://kharkovbut.narod.ru/xanthomelas.html.

07.02.2011 22:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Hm... There, on the 2nd upper photo in the right row you can see similar triangles, and this is the very хanthomelas: http://kharkovbut.narod.ru/xanthomelas.html.

07.02.2011 22:19, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Hm... There, on the 2nd upper photo in the right row you can see similar triangles, and this is the very хanthomelas: http://kharkovbut.narod.ru/xanthomelas.html.

07.02.2011 22:13, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Diamina, hm?

07.02.2011 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

Evgeny, you can read my description where I told about yellow triangles between the fringe and the rest part of the wings, what хanthomelas can't have.

07.02.2011 21:07, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This is хanthomelas, imho. Hind wings dark fringe is smoothly graduated outside.

07.02.2011 20:07, Peter Khramov:

Rename.

07.02.2011 18:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The men, born rename Heliconius Kluk, 1780: http://lepidoptera.ru/genus/helicunius/ rest does not.

07.02.2011 17:26, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, Evgeny and Dmitry can see all new added genera and species, don't worry.

07.02.2011 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus added.

07.02.2011 16:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus added.

07.02.2011 16:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus added.

07.02.2011 14:56, Peter Khramov:

OK thanks.

07.02.2011 14:56, Peter Khramov:

Today was the second delivery. If someone did not get it, but I think that he will receive - check whether the corresponding surrounding jackdaw in the Personal Area. If there is a jackdaw, and the delivery did not come - please email me (address at the bottom of each page).

07.02.2011 14:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subscribe normally held.

07.02.2011 13:08, Andrey Ponomarev:

http://www.faunaeur.org/index.php

07.02.2011 10:50, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 10:44, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 10:37, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 10:36, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 10:31, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 10:30, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 10:28, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 10:28, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 10:27, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 6:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just woke up: Moscow region, Zheleznodorozhny city, to the light.

07.02.2011 1:45, Peter Khramov:

Ok, now should work properly.

07.02.2011 1:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

07.02.2011 1:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 1:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

"Undetermined" yet.

07.02.2011 1:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is definitely not Milionia genus.

07.02.2011 1:10, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 0:51, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

07.02.2011 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved to R. aurota.

07.02.2011 0:49, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined".

07.02.2011 0:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

07.02.2011 0:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Petr, check it out! I've just added in the database this genus and all species adjacent!

07.02.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

It seems, after all, not a native, and overlooking it. Corrected.

07.02.2011 0:28, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, updated.

07.02.2011 0:20, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, check mail, please, sending you something important to discuss...

07.02.2011 0:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Done.

07.02.2011 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Collectible exotic and not only.

07.02.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Yes, could be. I've corrected info, Vasily, please, update this also at your personal webpage, if needed...

07.02.2011 0:14, Peter Khramov:

Species is identified not databased though. That's why still "uncertain". Dmitry, please, add Graphium clymenius in the database...

07.02.2011 0:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If it's some bug or what? Still "undetermined" with Guyana as a caught location.

06.02.2011 23:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

nakosyachil again !!! with native Sosxetra- noticed that between the author and the year is not a comma.

06.02.2011 23:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Just added Rothschildiae, no bugs, everything works.

06.02.2011 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I will check that. Anyway, if it works good? As for identifying, one may always use "this species is identified wrongly" button, don't worry...

06.02.2011 23:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Done. Not sure if it's identified right.

06.02.2011 22:35, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, if got mail, try, please, to add this very species in the database...

06.02.2011 22:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sosxetra grata, Walker 1862 ???

06.02.2011 18:21, Peter Khramov:

For a better understanding of the processes of administration and editing of the data on the website will soon be published more detailed infa about who brought the form into the database, who approved, who edited and so on, not just infa text and photos as they are now.The rights and the scope of the moderators at the moment:
Evgeny Komarov - approval of the proposed users of new species and genera for the base site, editing tribal affiliation types, as well as synonyms and Russian names Dmitry Pozhogin - work with all subspecies, available on the website,approval of the proposed users of new species and genera for the base site, editing tribal affiliation types, as well as synonyms and Russian names Vasiliy Feoktistov - edit data on the geography of species Well, I'm an admin little bit of everything, with a focus on work on the publication of photos and linking them to the speciesas well as the technical part. The above infa to help users find their way in an address to send someone the Old bugs on the site and similar comments / suggestions. However, you can always publish such a remark in the "community", they always react the one who is responsible for this trend.

06.02.2011 18:14, Peter Khramov:

With pedivikii, by the way, a person 5 day creep here ...

06.02.2011 18:13, Peter Khramov:

Basil, well, so who added something, do not you think? -))

06.02.2011 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Bingo: Rothschild is a true monster described nearly half of American lepidoptera, and it was so smart to give to a genus such a name in his honour!

06.02.2011 18:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Trogonoptera brookiana trogon, Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1860.

06.02.2011 18:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Species is ok, for sure, but what about genus, huh?

06.02.2011 17:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guys, this thing noticed: In "Vikikakii " link on this site is present in the second place: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lepidoptera!
There, at the bottom (where the reference). It called the link "Butterflies - a specialized site for butterflies in Russian ". So there!

06.02.2011 17:47, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, please, add and approve new species.

06.02.2011 17:47, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:46, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:46, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, please, add and approve new species.

06.02.2011 17:45, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:45, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:45, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:44, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new genus needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:44, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

06.02.2011 17:43, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, genus needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:43, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think, that is not Saturniidae. Sits not in the way Automeris usually does.

06.02.2011 17:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

06.02.2011 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:40, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:39, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:39, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio sataspes artaphernes,. o.Banggai- author forgot to write Honrath, 1886

06.02.2011 17:38, Peter Khramov:

Hey, genus needed at least...

06.02.2011 17:38, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, please, add and approve new species.

06.02.2011 17:37, Peter Khramov:

And the second monster also, please...

06.02.2011 17:37, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, get this monster added...

06.02.2011 17:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved to S. gerularia.

06.02.2011 17:36, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:35, Peter Khramov:

Goes from "undetermined" to E. larissa.

06.02.2011 17:35, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:34, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:33, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:33, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to "identified successfully".

06.02.2011 17:32, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:31, Peter Khramov:

Moved then to "identified successfully".

06.02.2011 17:31, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 17:30, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species, please, add and approve.

06.02.2011 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species, please, add and approve.

06.02.2011 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

06.02.2011 17:28, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, new species needed (to add and approve).

06.02.2011 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pasib and Fill it to the photo (it is necessary to rule).

06.02.2011 16:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio ulysses autolycus C. & R. Felder, 1865

06.02.2011 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitri, the way you look my Ulysses for subspecies. Region right there.

06.02.2011 16:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

06.02.2011 16:01, Peter Khramov:

Basil, "On the pulling of the LC - I'm still impressed by yesterday's pulling out almost three hundred photons, because - later the loan."

06.02.2011 15:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I'd better put a photo of the same specimen. Change desired.

06.02.2011 15:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I'd better put a photo of the same specimen. Change desired.

06.02.2011 15:18, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and on the worldwide distribution - simply mark all zones, business-something ...

06.02.2011 15:18, Peter Khramov:

Ulysses and several species have been fotami with, but not in the directory. Now all this is corrected.
As for the pull-out of the LC - I'm still impressed by yesterday's pulling out almost three hundred photons, because - later loans.Regarding suspicions - Vasily, I mean that similar options are now much faster visually caught, not that this is the selection of 100% false.
As for the areas I took the Old with the corresponding kayfedry Moscow State University, if I remember correctly.Madagascar - yes, the question, but I decided to use the system it is where the island is not separately allocated - to quickly assess bird's-eye view, so to speak. With regard to the Indo-Malayan Branch of the Australian - taken from the same place, I do not special, I will not throw ideas about the differences between faunas, but TZbird's eye view of the same difference there is just essential. Actually, with the Nearctic Palearctic also be combined, they represented different more for universal understanding than botanical. If you still have objections - reported (those).Dmitry, over the edit / delete subspecies - as I said earlier, I will do, but a little later. In the meantime, once I delete the subspecies.

06.02.2011 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Share my necessary, Andrew asked the right question: http://taxonomy.e-science.ru/i.php?c=511101

06.02.2011 14:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Vasiliy Feoktistov, 9:44 06.02.2011
I am wondering why Papilio ulysses moved to the base? Butterfly textbook! Reshoot? "
Reshoot the best quality and put in LC, it is necessary to pull it out.

06.02.2011 14:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Evgeny! If it's Arfak or Papua???

06.02.2011 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://taxonomy.e-science.ru/i.php?c=497119 in my case.

06.02.2011 13:46, Andrey Ponomarev:

Representatives of the family Crambidae are family Pyralidae?

06.02.2011 13:07, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, once more: shots are not moved to taxa which are still being moderated.

06.02.2011 12:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suggest to put Madagascar as individual region, cause there are so many endemic. This time chose Ethiopia :)

06.02.2011 11:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus added.

06.02.2011 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr Khramov, 15:27 05.02.2011

For example, here's a thing:
# Cresera affinis Rothschild, 1909. Arctiidae - http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_08/texte/c_affini.htm
# Epimolis affinis Rothschild, 1909. Arctiidae - http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_03/texte/e_affini.htm
# Haemanota affinis Rothschild, 1909. Arctiidae - http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_06/texte/h_affini.htm
Immediately suspicious. In general, the visual now all quickly captured.
What may be suspicious? After all, when hammered links given.

06.02.2011 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I am wondering why Papilio ulysses moved to the base? Butterfly textbook! Reshoot?

06.02.2011 7:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus added.

06.02.2011 6:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus done, move.

06.02.2011 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Previous post (in my opinion such a division should be) put the file here: http://rghost.ru/4223530

06.02.2011 4:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whew. Peter, you are too clever by half with the regions in my opinion. It is necessary: ​​Palaearctic. Afrotropical (North Africa is Palearctic), the Indo-Australian (Indo-Malayan and Australian areas excluded), Nearctic, Neotropical, Holarctic (Palaearctic and Nearctic) Worldwide distribution is also important (there are species such as Painted Lady).This is the English division I brought.

06.02.2011 1:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hyponephele lycaon (Rottemburg, 1775) .

06.02.2011 1:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Colias myrmidone.

06.02.2011 1:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

06.02.2011 1:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

you need to remove / edit to resolve the issue.

06.02.2011 0:56, Peter Khramov:

To go to "identified successfully".

06.02.2011 0:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Shoot with Antenor I probably stepped. Looked - subspecies had no zababahat on the machine.

06.02.2011 0:22, Peter Khramov:

Sarpedon everything is OK - it's me not through the system looked where the subspecies is not visible. Because wondered what kind of upgrade costs, and nothing new in him. And there antenor what? "No" is written instead of the subspecies? ..

06.02.2011 0:16, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

06.02.2011 0:12, Peter Khramov:

Pictures offered Natalia Demchenko and Andrey Ponomarev. In accordance with the number of photos, activated and illustrated many new types of ...

06.02.2011 0:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

introduced subspecies Sarpedon (you asked), vse evening sought subspecies and synonyms shoveled

06.02.2011 0:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Che Sarpedon wrong ???

06.02.2011 0:04, Peter Khramov:

On some Andrey's shots leaves look even better than butterflies, but there both are cool.

06.02.2011 0:02, Peter Khramov:

What a cute pooch.

05.02.2011 23:52, Peter Khramov:

Stamp one, stamp two, stamp three, kid is free.

05.02.2011 23:37, Peter Khramov:

Looking out...

05.02.2011 23:24, Peter Khramov:

This guy is sooo definite...

05.02.2011 23:21, Peter Khramov:

Pure Moomin troll, no less...

05.02.2011 23:19, Peter Khramov:

Photo is so cool, even though cold toned. One reason more to launch at last big size images uploading...

05.02.2011 22:59, Peter Khramov:

So, ladies and gentlemen moderators. Who and what is now updated these species
http://lepidoptera.ru/species/pharmacophagus-antenor/
http://lepidoptera.ru/species/graphium-sarpedon/?

05.02.2011 20:54, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2011 20:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Do not understand! What's doubles?
Peter! Passed, but not today - the hero of the day was very persistent and as a result, seriously tomorrow.

05.02.2011 20:39, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Endure http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5078/ and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4982/. There are all determined and recorded in the database!

05.02.2011 20:36, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, you're on spisochki something passed, I dumped you in the mail - foty await publication, but no species-based publish them nowhere. And fotam there except Guyana, by the way, there are quite a few types that are not in the database or in the database, but not the same.
ZY Who missed the new exotics, Guyana will soon be even, fresh, captured this year: -)

05.02.2011 20:25, Peter Khramov:

Now, the different areas of the site can also manage Yevgeny Komarov, Dmitry Pozhogin and Vasiliy Feoktistov.

05.02.2011 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Yeah.

05.02.2011 20:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.02.2011 20:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Endure http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5078/ and http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/4982/. There are all determined and recorded in the database!

05.02.2011 19:30, Peter Khramov:

Well, the system, I sculpt for Basil, something your really like how it works; -)

05.02.2011 19:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! You mean me or Basil? Like both the gone on a spree :)

05.02.2011 18:12, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2011 18:06, Peter Khramov:

I do megasystems him, and he spree, you know ...

05.02.2011 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, and I pulled myself together and identity is now vobyu these types in the database. ...... Ponimaesh spree!

05.02.2011 16:50, Peter Khramov:

Thank Nikolai Vladimirov Evgeny Davkaevu and for the new Pokemon.

05.02.2011 16:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 14:33 05.02.2011
Well, then, I protormozil! Who's birthday. Attending an evening :) and loans!

05.02.2011 15:57, Peter Khramov:

Excellent. And I'm still going to finish editing system for the Basil ...

05.02.2011 15:35, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looked new list, the super class. I take on a b c d. I find that discharged Eugene PM. And score new letters. :)

05.02.2011 15:31, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why is duplicated soobhenie when updating the page. Sorry. :(

05.02.2011 15:29, Alexandr Zhakov:

We analyze on the letters of the alphabet, and check for faunaeur.org, and so there is not any reference points, who checked. In this list, there are synonymous. they need to be replaced, as already wrote in childbirth and views.

05.02.2011 15:27, Peter Khramov:

For example, here's a thing:
# Cresera affinis Rothschild, 1909. Arctiidae
# Epimolis affinis Rothschild, 1909. Arctiidae
# Haemanota affinis Rothschild, 1909. Arctiidae
Immediately suspicious. In general, the visual now all quickly captured.

05.02.2011 15:24, Peter Khramov:

Remade list. Now - sorted, loaded much faster, showing the author and year, as well as the family that once could be quickly determined. I think all this can greatly simplify the task.

05.02.2011 15:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

We analyze on the letters of the alphabet, and check for faunaeur.org, and so there is not any reference points, who checked. In this list, there are synonymous. they need to be replaced, as already wrote in childbirth and views.

05.02.2011 15:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, what about my question, I have handled one-third of the list to continue?

05.02.2011 14:56, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, about the sort - is now going to watch, although I do not understand how it can help, there are now forms of the same name and so go together, and the new sorting will be linked only to the characters, but not to the system ...

05.02.2011 14:51, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter, what about my question, I have handled one-third of the list to continue?

05.02.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, why approve if no genus databased yet?

05.02.2011 14:37, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the nudge. Moved.

05.02.2011 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Moved also to glycerion.

05.02.2011 14:35, Peter Khramov:

To go to glycerion.

05.02.2011 14:33, Peter Khramov:

It seems that there was no glitch. Eugene sent an explanation to the post office. Incorrect born deleted. New taxa can safely start. If any further comments would be - reported.

05.02.2011 14:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yevgeny Komarov, 9:18 05.02.2011

Lord! On the morning of the glitch popped up when you add delivery. Let Peter will understand at first, but in the meantime let the brake with the addition of new taxa!
Eugene wanted to kind of pile under 3 types: # 5058; # 5081 and # 5025, wait until.
And in fact, it is necessary to scatter the tropics on the shelves quickly.

05.02.2011 13:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Ok, let it be. Waiting for Petr's answer about this morning technical bug and will do that in the evening (have some plans for this day already).

05.02.2011 13:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok then, let it be Phrygionis paradoxata (Guenée, [1858]), that's it. Will be corrected if needed.

05.02.2011 13:41, Evgeny Komarov:

Both as synonyms? How come? One must be the main anyway! And subspecies are not set yet.

05.02.2011 13:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Both names are to set as synonyms, Phrygionis paradoxata (Guenée, [1858]) and Phrygionis argentata (Drury, 1773). Not do subspecies though, incolorata, Prout, 1910 (unknown).

05.02.2011 13:19, Evgeny Komarov:

But there argentata is a synonym to paradoxata, pay attention: http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=6671. There is The Global Lepidoptera Names Index, so their taxonomic statuses are questionable both. Can be any possible. Let's wait for some opinions more! Species is clear, but the name is not. Maybe, just set one as a main, and the second as a synonym? Toss a coin.

05.02.2011 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2011 12:54, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2011 12:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one is also Coenonympha glycerion.

05.02.2011 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

This is Coenonympha glycerion.

05.02.2011 12:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is also argentata: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/geometroidea/geometridae/ennominae/phrygionis/index.html#argentat. What should we consider default?

05.02.2011 12:44, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2011 12:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, confusing. Your suggestion was my first thought, saw your link before and found out after this: http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=6671, thus offered argentata.

05.02.2011 12:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pozvrashayus to http://lepidoptera.ru/auniq/, there really is synonymous in both species, and in labor. But shovel 2134 names several times (I do not think I'm alone watching) Sisyphean task. Peter was requezt put in alphabetical order by the specific name. (the second word), if the program does not work, then I can try to create one Eksele.True full list burst into one column. species names will have to manually pull out. but by the end of the day to finish. and then analyze spell and close this topic. :) By the way it will be possible to correct names and synonyms lead.

05.02.2011 12:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasily! Is Phrygionis paradoxata incolorata, Prout, 1910, not good for you? See no differences except that this one is rather new, and that is worn-out, look: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_geometridae_1.htm#top.

05.02.2011 12:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Agree. Other are different!

05.02.2011 11:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Some Phrygionis, suspect, Phrygionis argentata (Drury, 1773).

05.02.2011 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hemiceras lissanella, Thiaucourt, 1994, imho. http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_notodontidae_2.htm.

05.02.2011 10:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr, move, please! Identified three weeks ago.

05.02.2011 10:41, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2011 10:38, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

05.02.2011 10:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, that's it! Approve!

05.02.2011 10:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to me this one is Eulepidotis juliata (Stoll, 1790)
http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_noctuidae_3.htm.

05.02.2011 10:25, Evgeny Komarov:

:) :)

05.02.2011 10:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Dalceridae.

05.02.2011 10:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Dalceridae.

05.02.2011 10:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Dalceridae.

05.02.2011 10:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Dalceridae.

05.02.2011 9:18, Evgeny Komarov:

Lord! On the morning of the glitch popped up when you add delivery. Let Peter will understand at first, but in the meantime let the brake with the addition of new taxa!

05.02.2011 8:51, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 23:08 04.02.2011
I propose to make in our cozy shed Tatiana Gordeeva and Maxim Klepikova. Those in favor, those against, who do not care - ask everyone to speak. -
I am also in favor.

05.02.2011 7:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter was determined by mail: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5005/?
Just I remember that fooled with it, and there is only comments Dmitry mine. If the mail is necessary to build upon something.
Petr Khramov, 23:08 04.02.2011
I propose to make in our cozy shed Tatiana Gordeeva and Maxim Klepikova. Those in favor, those against, who do not care - ask everyone to speak.
I am for.

05.02.2011 5:43, Peter Khramov:

Uga!

05.02.2011 4:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

field Author and year reduced to a single universal
Uga tovagischschi !!!

05.02.2011 3:21, Peter Khramov:

As far as I can remember, the genitive is really has one "i". Can't totally rely on my memory though, cause my last Latin lessons were school ones, so let's name it with one "i". Anyway, there are always many exceptions in the wordshaping we should consider also...

05.02.2011 3:15, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain" still.

05.02.2011 3:12, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, a bug fixed.

05.02.2011 3:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I can not go into any kind. some glitch

05.02.2011 3:06, Peter Khramov:

Brackets are ready. To them.

05.02.2011 3:05, Peter Khramov:

What about for so long dreamed of the Bolsheviks happened. Now, in the form of introducing new species and genera in the base of the site of the field Author and year reduced to a single universal, which can be used in different combinations of square and round brackets. Interpreted options: Author, Year; (Author, Year); Author [Year] ([Author], Year) and (Author, [Year]).At the same time between the author and the year of the comma is required for the program to adequately analyze the information entered. Furthermore, the list of species based on the page type, and sorts the list in the database for the family are now displayed page author and year to be able to immediately assess whether affixed brackets.In case you notice any glitches with brackets - according to the subject or by mail.
And again, pay attention that the introduction of new species as the name you need to enter a short name (ie just urticae, instead of Vanessa urticae), as clearly stated in the form of downloads.Who I did well to understand and program version of Vanessa urticae, but still - note the citizens (not yet show a finger).
And finally: subspecies and forms is necessary to offer a view of the comments through the form load new types of mold is not necessary.Moreover, it is not necessary to make new types, versions of which (albeit with ustrevshimi names) are already available on the site - they also better communicate through comments to the form.
ZY All taxa previously made with parentheses in the wrong places, where necessary, corrected.

05.02.2011 2:57, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

05.02.2011 2:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is also Pieris napi.

05.02.2011 2:39, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

05.02.2011 1:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Pieris napi (Linnaeus, 1758). Let's move already, can't be like this, uncool.

05.02.2011 0:33, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yevgeny Komarov, 04-02-2011 22:34
Michael FIBIGER and Hermann H. HACKER. Systematic List of the Noctuoidea of ​​Europe (Notodontidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae, Lymantriidae, Erebidae, Micronoctuidae, and Noctuidae). Esperiana, Buchreihe zur Entomologie, Bd. 11: 7-690 Schwanfeld, 6. Juni 2004. I have this work with other output data: Esperiana, Buchreihe zur Entomologie, Bd. 11: 93-2005 Schwanfeld, 29 Juni 2005. It only Notodontidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae, Lymantriidae, Erebidae with 93po 108 str.Esli you zhenyaya, something else, please send.
Peter boldly introduces new people, everyone is involved, according to their abilities and knowledge, and of course time.

04.02.2011 23:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr Khramov, 22:45 04.02.2011
So what to look for - the faunaeur.org not satisfied as evrobazy?
Fully ustaraivaet, I suggest to him a few times.
I wrote about electronic database, an electronic list of all species has been previously checklist 1995, which was built with the original catalog of this site, as I understand it.

04.02.2011 23:08, Peter Khramov:

I propose to make in our cozy shed Tatiana Gordeeva and Maxim Klepikova. Those in favor, those against, who do not care - ask everyone to speak.

04.02.2011 22:56, Alexandr Zhakov:

Petr Khramov, 22:45 04.02.2011
So what to look for - the faunaeur.org not satisfied as evrobazy?
Fully ustaraivaet, I suggest to him a few times.
I wrote about electronic database, an electronic list of all species has been previously checklist 1995, which was built with the original catalog of this site, as I understand it.

04.02.2011 22:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

This work is. But it is only Europe, Palaearctic much wider. And North Africa and much of Asia.

04.02.2011 22:45, Peter Khramov:

So what to look for - the faunaeur.org not satisfied as evrobazy?

04.02.2011 22:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander Zhakov, 04.02.2011 21:20 - Here are these: Michael FIBIGER and Hermann H. HACKER. Systematic List of the Noctuoidea of ​​Europe (Notodontidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae, Lymantriidae, Erebidae, Micronoctuidae, and Noctuidae). Esperiana, Buchreihe zur Entomologie, Bd. 11: 7-690 Schwanfeld, 6. Juni 2004. I This work was recommended by Alex Matt (ZIN), when I asked him to recommend a modern system of Noctuidae. It should - send pdf.

04.02.2011 21:20, Alexandr Zhakov:

The catalog, it seems to me a bit more complicated to create it was taken European base (which I do not know) and were driven Asian species, the extra European removed, but not all :) in leaf rollers from 10 species, which are not in Russia, and they are completely clean. We must look for a European base. Which Scoops Palearctic question?

04.02.2011 21:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Same: http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Adeloneivaia%20catoxantha.htm.

04.02.2011 21:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 19:36 04.02.2011 - Some who have. I'll try, of course, but also, I'm afraid - be bold :)

04.02.2011 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hm, not sure also, guys, choose one. It really varies, http://www.saturniidae-web.de/Adeloneivaia%20boisduvali.htm and http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_saturniidae_2.htm, French and Germans are of different opinions, so :)

04.02.2011 19:36, Peter Khramov:

By the way, if one thread of normal contact with the authors of this catalog, they also have a ready base of the system - could ask for. Although it may have been too eager to have: -)

04.02.2011 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, thank you for a file.

04.02.2011 19:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, thank you! I obtain and maintain.

04.02.2011 19:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil - Scoop Palearctic sent to the mail.

04.02.2011 19:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil - Scoop Palearctic sent to the mail.

04.02.2011 19:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A reader format DJvu just in case (if there is no one) tossed here: http://rghost.ru/4204472

04.02.2011 19:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, 04.02.2011 17:09 - Rhode pyadnits Synchlora in the database with all kinds. You can transfer photos # 5076, # 5061, # 5047, # 5022 and # 4998.

04.02.2011 18:56, Evgeny Komarov:

I'm also stuck, because of this simultaneousness, as there are Saturniidae as well as Saturnidae at the same time. Me and Vasily copypasted different references, so :). I vote for my version cause Latin species names usually have one "i" at the end if based on a male surname and two "i" if on a female one. But there always can be exceptions, so ... DON'T KNOW! I have two good references with one "i". Vasily has also not bad one with two "i". Mistake? Fuck knows (sorry)! Anyway, I think that's irrelevant (these tropics are soo far away).

04.02.2011 18:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Alexander pasib: already downloaded :)

04.02.2011 18:28, Alexandr Zhakov:

:)
Sinev DJvu http://rghost.ru/4203728

04.02.2011 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I think, this is Adeloneivaia catoxantha male (Rothschild,1907). No any closer: http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_saturniidae_2.htm.

04.02.2011 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, no mistakes: I just copypasted another source.

04.02.2011 17:59, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, if Vasily named that right, please, update.

04.02.2011 17:58, Peter Khramov:

Basil, foty not move to the species that are able to "moderation." Only after their approval, for example, Eugene.
([Author] & Author, Year) - to shoot the person who invented it ...

04.02.2011 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, should be two "i": http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/bombycoidea/saturniidae/ceratocampinae/adeloneivaia/index.

04.02.2011 17:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I, too, would be a PDF or DJvu Sinev useful. Maybe someone will throw down on file sharing? This example: http://rghost.ru/ as link in this topic to place.
By the way: Create race pyadnits Synchlora (10 species from two sources). Photo # 5076, # 5061, # 5047, # 5022 and # 4998 have to move there.

04.02.2011 17:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maybe! vskidku recently came across ([Author] & Author, Year).

04.02.2011 17:07, Peter Khramov:

Today or tomorrow night to try to make a version in which the field for the author and the year with the introduction of a new taxon is one thing, but the program will break samstoyatelno data from it to the author, the year and the option brackets. How I did - accomplish your goal, and until I ask the new taxa in the database does not drive (if there is need brackets).

04.02.2011 16:44, Peter Khramov:

To go. Note: there Saturnidae with one "i" is in the database, not two.

04.02.2011 16:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to S. molina.

04.02.2011 16:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2011 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2011 16:41, Peter Khramov:

Now he consults with Vlad Proklova. He says he, yes, it is possible zayuzat faunaeur.org, and directory Sineva - both are good. This first little more adequately at the level of families, and the second - at the level of species and genera, but the difference is not as radical as that between any of them and the checklist, which was created on the basis of the base site.By the way, if there is a PDF Sineva - please throw me too, and I shake off my copy.
With regard to the brackets - loom options Author, Year; (Author, Year); ([Author], Year) and (Author, [Year]). Correctly I understand that in no other way can not be?

04.02.2011 16:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

I accept any option but to only one. Knowing the rules of play is much easier :). Blue, are in djvu, pdf-ku search is not necessary, it is still difficult to send. Yeshe time specified for itself. For a site lepidoptera.ru accept systematics of 2008. The blue catalog for Euro-Asian species. Enough for me, I do not know about others.

04.02.2011 16:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Until the evening!

04.02.2011 16:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Included in the base. You can transfer http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/5066/

04.02.2011 16:17, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 16:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Created genus moths Leuciris (2 species). Photo # 5066 can be moved there.

04.02.2011 16:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander Zhakov, 04.02.2011 15:17 - Let's hand, but from a single source. TB I seem to have seen pdf-ku Sineva! I look for!

04.02.2011 15:58, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:40, Peter Khramov:

Due to the fact that now actively drawn into the work of the new moderators, those signatures to the types of options that were previously (signed by the author of the text and photos), now is not quite adequate. In the near future I will do a new version to it reflected all those who worked on the view (made to the base, he insisted brought subspecies, signs, etc.)

04.02.2011 15:38, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:37, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:35, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

04.02.2011 15:34, Peter Khramov:

To go.

04.02.2011 15:34, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2011 15:28, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:20, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:19, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 15:17, Alexandr Zhakov:

The main genus and species, the remaining taxa Accessory can be used only in specific cases, where without them confused. Just like in the ornithopter. Again, I return to the taxonomy: Sinev very well, but the name will have blivat by hand and flipping book. If we take http://www.faunaeur.org/index.php there Electonics search all been recruited.But again, this is only for Europe. There are global systemic sites. Tropical possible for him.
Well, so END END :)

04.02.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2011 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

04.02.2011 14:57, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

04.02.2011 14:52, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 14:50, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 14:46, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 14:34, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 14:23, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, so END END :)

04.02.2011 14:16, Peter Khramov:

As for the sorting and searching of messages in this topic: I think sort desc uncomfortable to read, when you need to read a few posts in a row. If you need to go quickly to the last post - just press the End key on the keyboard, and all - you're there. SinceMessages accumulate quite a lot, I think, need to move into the shadows or even delete temporary posts, which cease to be relevant immediately after reading. In addition, the occasion and the author - is not in the same field they will not.

04.02.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

04.02.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved to agrippina.

04.02.2011 14:10, Peter Khramov:

To go.

04.02.2011 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2011 13:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Added born Copiopteryx Saturn with all kinds. Peter! Photo # 5011 and # 5016 can be transferred.

04.02.2011 13:30, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 13:29, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 13:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, 04.02.2011 12:18 - I think similarly, just such a decision must be taken together! Or, after a joint decision of the original system, as I said above. Painfully subjective in many taxa above species level, especially the genus / subgenus.

04.02.2011 12:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rhymnaria I think of the families have to clean up.
By Peter Eugene support the proposal on the opening of this topic with the last post (messages get lost). Do it if you can.

04.02.2011 12:30, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov, 04.02.2011 12:18 - I think similarly, just such a decision must be taken together! Or, after a joint decision of the original system, as I said above. Painfully subjective in many taxa above species level, especially the genus / subgenus.

04.02.2011 12:26, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 12:26, Evgeny Komarov:

Idalus carinosa !!!

04.02.2011 12:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, on Rhymnaria is probably subgenus: all kind of here for Neolycaena says: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/lycaenidae/theclinae/neolycaena/index.html#rhymnus

04.02.2011 11:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So just took it and started the for moderation. With these three: Thysania agrippina, Thysania pomponia and Thysania zenobia. Even with the moderation removed.

04.02.2011 11:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! Tysania already in the database.
And in my accident (04.02.2011 9:57) post another pass - "Rhymnaria (Zhdanko, 1983) ". Hurry to edit could, and then bungle in a hurry!

04.02.2011 11:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 11:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 11:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 11:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Created scoop race Thysania (3 species under Agrippina). It is possible to carry: # 5028 and # 5027

04.02.2011 11:03, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 10:01, Evgeny Komarov:

To my penultimate post - he missed the title race. It should read: "... this kind of way in Neolycaena. "

04.02.2011 9:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! And you can do so in this thread on the back of the posts were sorted, ie last top?

04.02.2011 9:57, Evgeny Komarov:

I offer to brainstorm the following question:
In the list of genera moderated hanging born blues (Zhdanko, 1983) with model Vido R. rhymnus. However, in the Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of Russia in the form of kind. On most viewed me Resources - Rhymnaria seen as a subgenus Neolycaena. This case is just in the development of my previous post.

04.02.2011 9:47, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one is also Zatrephes trailii Butler, 1877. Let's move there.

04.02.2011 8:33, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 7:21, Evgeny Komarov:

"Alexander Zhakov: ... The question is what will take the systematics of the original. "

The logical question, and finally come to a head. I think that Russia should adopt as a basis catalog Lepidoptera Sineva, to encompass all the groups and and fresh.The nuances of individual families, superfamilies can be discussed if there is a significant recent work, such as the one that I use for scoops Palearctic. From the tropics more and (my personal opinion) is not so important.

04.02.2011 7:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Automeris egeus (Cramer, 1775) as a version, of not so many though: http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Saturniidae/Hemileucinae/Automeris/Guy%2001306-s3.jpg (Automeris genus for sure!).

04.02.2011 6:34, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 3:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Don't worry, your, the biggest one, will wait for your shooting.

04.02.2011 3:46, Konstantin Kraevsky:

I checked it up in wikipedia and saw the photo with description...
Meh, I didn't catch it :)
Locals seeing me shooting call me up and show curious as they think butterflies/moths. But they don't notice small ones. And birds which know "insects hot spots" pick all them up in the morning...

04.02.2011 3:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 3:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Pieris napi (Linnaeus, 1758).

04.02.2011 3:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 3:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 3:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 3:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 3:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 3:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

04.02.2011 3:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

will integrate field-author of the year and not invent anything

04.02.2011 2:54, Peter Khramov:

Lord, once again about brackets: the following paragraph will make the system for normal administration of the database. So far I did not - please, do not samodeytelnosti their inappropriate insertion into a field, I train it then all will have to interrupt her hands. Dmitri, the subspecies is also a concern.
Tomorrow I will try to the brackets were ready.

04.02.2011 2:51, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the list of synonyms - tomorrow I will try to make a quick option, along with streamlined. Specific examples of duplicate, please fold Eugene mail (see. Above). By subspecies - sort alphabetically done, editing - in the task list there, too, I will do later.

04.02.2011 2:46, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved then.

04.02.2011 2:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

04.02.2011 2:45, Peter Khramov:

To go.

04.02.2011 2:45, Peter Khramov:

Moved to H. armgera.

04.02.2011 1:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

shown in Allancastria twice
• Allancastria cerisyi
• Allancastria cretica

04.02.2011 1:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

According to the list on http://lepidoptera.ru/auniq/. It is necessary to check the correctness of generic names. Synonyms species names, just to be different. The question is, what kind of systematics will take over the original. What would all the same tune dudeli.
List ran, it is huge and is completely structured., Could you put in alphabetical order by the second word.And I think it makes sense to parse the list of letters and check carefully that this topic would be closed and we will do the same thing several times.

04.02.2011 1:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

Lasiommata maera (Linnaeus, 1758).

04.02.2011 1:02, Alexandr Zhakov:

Chazara briseis (Linnaeus, 1764).

04.02.2011 1:01, Alexandr Zhakov:

Coenonympha pamphilus (Linnaeus, 1758).

04.02.2011 0:59, Alexandr Zhakov:

Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner, [1808]).

04.02.2011 0:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

hammered for Brukovskaya ptitsekrylki subspecies. like all gud. Two prosby- question editing / deletion of information introduced on the subspecies (little mistake there somewhere), the second is to put subspecies in alphabetical order, not in order of entry in the database.

03.02.2011 23:59, Peter Khramov:

Added fresh pictures from Eugene Glebov and Oleg Goncharov.

03.02.2011 23:30, Peter Khramov:

I like almost all in this topic "at you" went ... I suggest not to soar once again the brain, make it a rule: anyone who has access to this subject, talk to each other "to you." Does anyone have any objections to this case?

03.02.2011 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.02.2011 23:24, Peter Khramov:

So far goes to I. carinosa, "uncertain". Unanimous approval?

03.02.2011 23:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Gorgonidia buckleyi.

03.02.2011 23:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined".

03.02.2011 23:20, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.02.2011 23:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Z. trailii.

03.02.2011 23:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

03.02.2011 23:14, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain" yet.

03.02.2011 23:00, Peter Khramov:

The home page now displays the number of species and other taxa in the different status of the site as well as photos and comments.

03.02.2011 22:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK, Peter. And Eugene, I sent it only just (thought one mind not to pull). The rest then look (Net evening mountain now).

03.02.2011 22:27, Peter Khramov:

Results to date: The system is ready for Eugene, and it actively uses its already - many species and some genera shipped with moderation. Just completed the system for Dmitry's see what will turn out to subspecies. Vasily I still have a couple of questions formed, tomorrow you stop ringing ...

03.02.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Basil, as I wrote above, this Old Eugene takes the post ...

03.02.2011 21:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I have one already suspected: scoop Discestra hartigi 9903 seems really Cardepia hartigi Parenzan, 1981 please check: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/warp/lepidoptera-index-h .html I'm not mistaken there.

03.02.2011 21:06, Peter Khramov:

Yes, there is a brief view of the species. And Papilio machaon machaon - they'll both the species name. One full, one short. Perhaps even it had some wording to distinguish between them, but now I do not remember. And what it is normal - normal in most cases, but there are straight doubles / synonyms.
ZYDmitry, pay attention, in the "synonym" need to enter the full name of the form, and after the comma comma ...

03.02.2011 21:04, Peter Khramov:

In some situations, when flipping pages in the gallery correctly pass parameters to determine the accuracy. For example, you choose to display photos, views of which are not defined, and on every page, this parameter is reset. Now the situation is corrected.

03.02.2011 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Under the short names of species mean? So that's fine. Although the course is to test. Later I will look here: http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/warp/lepidoptera-index-w.html (no longer know where).

03.02.2011 17:08, Peter Khramov:

Important infa : Gentlemen, on page http://lepidoptera.ru/auniq/ posted a list of species that have short names are duplicated. Most of them - it is quite normal, and there is occasional overlap, but some - is still synonymous, ie full of doubles. Please look, and if the eyes catch hold of something obviously redundant, send Evgeny Komarov mail evkomarov @ rambler.ru doubles list, you need to thin out (just copy from the page names and numbers next to them).
ZY Doubles very much, so the page can be loaded very long. For example, a minute. Or even more. Wait for a full load.

03.02.2011 16:42, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

03.02.2011 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Some Dalceridae, can't continue further.

03.02.2011 16:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ok then, no doubts: Limacodidae, Miresa clarissa, (Stoll, 1790), female.

03.02.2011 16:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

03.02.2011 15:38, Peter Khramov:

Now on the page with a photo displays a comment of the author, if available when downloading pictures.

03.02.2011 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Meh, South America. Meeeeeeeh.

03.02.2011 14:30, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, show them just an example of one of the foreign authors on the site. Here, Simon Coombes: http://lepidoptera.ru/species/argynnis-niobe/ here it is used as a photo illustration, http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/2287/ it here in the gallery, http: // lepidoptera. ru / authors / simon-coombes / are his personal page on the website, http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/?prec=all&fem=0&people=12&perpage=50&order=dt here a selection of his photos in the gallery.Each author should be Name Last Name Email (will be protected from spam) Website Country (plus city or country) Brief information about yourself (optional) - can be in English.

03.02.2011 13:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter !!! One can put the whole picture, so I showed them what it looks like. ??

03.02.2011 13:40, Evgeny Komarov:

I do not have. All proposals that do not involve their immediate execution, but are made for the future. A proposed above pervocherednoe beyond doubt. Let's wait a little :)

03.02.2011 13:11, Peter Khramov:

Notes voiced themes:
1. Comments from the geography and general comments to the species. Generally, yes, infa of comments should crawl to the descriptions themselves. But this mechanism is still not worked. So let such comments is braked.Specifically geography: I had the idea to go on the course Zoogeo Zone Countries → Regions (especially important for the Russian Federation). And do it all in the sign, rather than just text. Ie to be able to select in the directory. The benefit in the same directory of the Russian Federation has already broken down. Yet it - later.
2. Photographs from foreign users.Dmitry, all is well, but the next few days I will not be able to do them, because the list of more urgent cases there on the site, as well as a lot of pictures uploaded polzovatelyai. I think these photos are very good, but wait a few days. Would not mind?
3. subspecies, forms, and other fine.Again, let the issue come to a standstill until Eugene will not understand that it has accumulated, and as long as I do not make the mechanism of adding parentheses. Then monzhno will continue in a new format.Regarding the complexity of the classification: subspecies will now while Dmitri, see if he'll be OK, the same or a similar system could be extended to other users.With regards to the subfamilies and similar taxa - as said earlier, yes, a necessary thing, but first, first put in order what is, at first the improving performance of new modders to all everything was clear, and then - more difficult. Otherwise, it may be quite a mess.I offer the following summary:
Eugene trains in the system, that is.I am for him to finish a couple of useful things
Then he suffers taxa of "moderation" and makes other advances on the basis of
I sculpt system for Basil technical information to your photos and Dmitry on the subspecies
They try these systems work
If everything is OK - everyone starts to work productively in their system,I turn to the accumulated images, photographs, and other foreign technical and photographic issues
Later, when everyone in the ointment all - think, who still need (or want) any law that stands to complicate how to translate the Old of the comments to the descriptions and any comments required in the first place and so on.There are objections to such things?

03.02.2011 13:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! There is one sentence: It is necessary to allow users to (all) edit or delete your own messages to the types and photos.

03.02.2011 13:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, with the subspecies yesterday you got excited :) will be when the required fields, and then upload. As for adding species to nominative already lodged in the base leave - why not. Though it is better, I think, from the tropics to begin limited those species which already have photographic material.I myself am waiting for debugging control system / access and as you see, is confined to small "interference " in the eyes for a long time namozolil places. To do something more global is not worth it, and I can not so then Peter and I did not have same finish.

03.02.2011 12:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, I have a question: I last several subspecies promptly inserted in the absence of fields. Now I do want to throw types of nominative these genera. So it will be normal?

03.02.2011 11:54, Evgeny Komarov:

Thank you, Alexander. I actually believe that the proliferation of BM detailed eventually replace the little speaking specify the type of habitat Palearctic or Holarctic. Ie out of comments that should go directly to the page with the appropriate editing. Who will do it, Peter and we also - we will understand.But in any case I will look carefully.

03.02.2011 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I will continue to add tropical bears no subfamilies, subspecies, form only genus and species of the nominative. And on the subspecies and forms that promptly inserted last in the absence of relevant fields for the document it had promptly inserted, it is necessary to edit. With pleasure on the shelves, I made out to be.

03.02.2011 11:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter, still photos from Dave Rolfe sent to the soap. rake. type and country in the file name. there basically tropical Saturn.

03.02.2011 11:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Looked site Dipper Dubatolov, there really is, and given, but on his website lishaynitsy is all new. Look more serious look. http://fen.nsu.ru/~vvdubat/Lithosiinae/Lithosiinaelist.html

03.02.2011 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Good day, fell slightly from the process. This page is much better to communicate in a personal, on site. Now, comments or suggestions Evgeny Komarov. In the description of habitat types, the information from the older editions, it is desirable not to take the example of "Bear village (Epicallia villica) ", where the USSR, Leningrad, the Crimea -Seperate indicated.It seems to me that it is better adapted to the current state.

03.02.2011 10:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter, sent to you on soap first 50 photo by Dave Rolfe

03.02.2011 10:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That brought in haste by the example-bear Gorgonidia buckleyi whitfordi (Rothschild, 1909) (hammered yesterday):
Family: Arctiidae
Subfamily: Arctiinae
Tribe: Phaegopterini
Occupation: Gorgonidia
Type: buckleyi Druce 1883
Subspecies: whitfordi (Rothschild, 1909)
Approximately so output is necessary, and for that we need the appropriate field, and then classification of b / m become the norm. I'm at least as seen.

03.02.2011 9:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Another person authorized juzat your photos Here is his letter.
Certainly you can Dmitriy, so feel free to use whichever you like.
If there are any particular families or species you want photos of let me know, I may have specimens I can photograph for you.
I am always glad to help fellow enthusiasts.
Dave
His name is Dave Rolfe lives Gravesend, Kent, United Kingdom
photos here http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000282230847#!/photos.php?id=100000282230847

03.02.2011 9:02, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And superfamily do not forget. Example: Pyadenitsevye-Gemetroidea superfamily comprises three family Geometridae, Uraniidae, Sematuridae and red letters there are no do not, just fill in the form in order to bring more if you want to classify.

03.02.2011 8:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Konstantin, that is well-known http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thysania_agrippina.

03.02.2011 8:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So it is necessary to make forms subspecies, forms (if they have a name) subfamilies. In forgiven classification does not roll here in any way. Dmitri, about Guiana, I mean it: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Французская_Гвиана (as the website of the French).

03.02.2011 1:38, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Yes, that is #4995. Tried to push it to a paper just to get more contrast, no way... It changed the pose.

03.02.2011 1:30, Konstantin Kraevsky:

#5017 from the backside.

03.02.2011 1:30, Konstantin Kraevsky:

#5017 front view.

03.02.2011 1:29, Konstantin Kraevsky:

#5017 from its side.

03.02.2011 1:26, Konstantin Kraevsky:

This is #5027 underside. Size is about 20-22 cm. A guy who worked there and showed me this butterfly pushed it measuring with a string, it flew away and was hit at once by some bird.

03.02.2011 1:19, Peter Khramov:

Ooh ... There is also a form so subtypes of the window title of the form pozapihivali ... Now just pause to be done to bring this case to order and hanging large red letters with explanations ...

03.02.2011 1:18, Konstantin Kraevsky:

Yes, that's #5079 shot from another angle.

03.02.2011 1:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Man Frenchman. David Aspire.
http://www.facebook.com/#!/photos.php?id=1638281037
photos here

03.02.2011 1:03, Peter Khramov:

Dmitri, on the truck - that's good. Only where there Gallery (aka I have not even opened in French) and on the brow necessary data for registration on the site ...

03.02.2011 0:57, Peter Khramov:

With regard to new types of downloads : to clarify the situation - Gentlemen, do break .
1. With brackets practice of arbitrariness. I understand that they are not enough in making the database of new taxa, but to do so, as it is now (for example, to sculpt a year to the author) - it tryndets.Put the new mechanism, where you can select the bracket, then we will continue the introduction of species. While leaving the function itself - not for wholesale calculations, and for the people that the new foty puts, and want to just kind of make
2. "In moderation," is now 77 genera and 516 species.And, although most of them just need to run in order to understand, approve, or not, on the analysis of Eugene still need time.
So, gentlemen, suspend wholesale laying open new taxa. I think in a few days you can continue.Now I bring himself finishing touches to the system of Eugene, that he might have to do it fully, and then do the admin Dmitry and Vasily.

03.02.2011 0:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The man agreed to post their photos on the site. You can take any.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1638281037#!/profile.php?id=1638281037
He asks the photograph write only his name (and there is)

03.02.2011 0:10, Peter Khramov:

Regarding passwords: everything is OK, that the paramount task list (see. Above) and, moreover, already partially done. Wait a little longer. Eugene, you have the perfect password drive there something practically nothing: -) Although little finger drag to the letter "p" - is so, it is not very comfortable. In general, I will soon do. But first - all improvements on the admin system.Eugene, with regards to the transfer of taxa from "moderation" in the ready - is now completed yet. ZY Although this issue is more suitable for the post, but not for this topic.
Regarding driving species or break - a question to Eugene.

03.02.2011 0:06, Peter Khramov:

Lord, on the upgrade page. If you have comments or post it sdelal some similar action (brought new species), that if you try to refresh the page after that, the browser will ask you whether to transmit the data again. If the answer to pass - he still posted a time (as happened in Eugene).If no response is transmitted - the page is not updated. The idea is that it is technically fixable, and I get better with time, but it is so - and do not refresh the page, if you have just downloaded something through it.Instead, for example, stick with your mouse in the address bar and press Enter or the appropriate button (will be called "Jump" or something of the sort - depending on the browser. It is located generally on the right of the address bar).

02.02.2011 22:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

So new types of drive or a break ???

02.02.2011 22:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

French Guyana had not been. Always English (the only English-speaking country in the YuzhAmerike). French Guiana.

02.02.2011 22:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I understand that the amount of work a purely technical (programming) is very large. But how I can get the necessary zaloginivatsya every 7-10 minutes of inactivity on the site! Gores your e-mail to enter!

02.02.2011 21:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Keep I especially kind to the types of photos that drove in the first place so as the time to deal with them. Now the rest of the moth for the database to achieve.

02.02.2011 21:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Streetcar hullabaloo! Add comment, from a page does not go away. Five to seven minutes stupidly decided to upgrade - there is a new, or not? In the end, I add the same comment! Opera Browser. No other operations on the page does not.

02.02.2011 21:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I can be, I brake, but I do not understand my actions for example in such a situation: the database is a kind of a bear Idalus already with lots of species, including and a number of these pictures. Opportunities to transfer them from "on the moderation " in the catalog for all to see for myself, I do not see yet! Or I do not understand?

02.02.2011 20:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I can be, I brake, but I do not understand my actions for example in such a situation: the database is a kind of a bear Idalus already with lots of species, including and a number of these pictures. Opportunities to transfer them from "on the moderation " in the catalog for all to see for myself, I do not see yet! Or I do not understand?

02.02.2011 19:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, I Guyanese bears dobyu and stop now. A site that takes, I think it is a correct French, Guyana and French Guiana has been a long time so they need to know there the butterflies.

02.02.2011 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Basil, I think you need a little break with putting a new disk imaging - Evgeny need some time to get into the role and begin to cover the situation on the basis of the whole. However, there is already more important than his opinion, not mine.

02.02.2011 19:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Guys, I correctly identities with the addition of bears? Not nakosyachil? And for the first time I am doing it (all day with this website for French Guyana Species Kolupaev).

02.02.2011 18:14, Peter Khramov:

Now Eugene will / will adopt the new species, and all will be clear. In connection with a certain transition period, when new moderators are drawn into the work, there will be some deceleration in the sequencing of data on the site, but then everything should just fly: -)

02.02.2011 18:06, Peter Khramov:

Now the species of butterflies can be sorted by popularity on the site. Stuck hid curious than highly useful but in some situations and it can itself practically useful.

02.02.2011 17:53, Peter Khramov:

Designated genera and families were not bear illustrations, some new families have not been translated into active (have not got the time from the base to the catalog) - now everything is put in order.

02.02.2011 17:21, Peter Khramov:

These two families are added. Lord, because family added rare and most of them are in the database already, now propose to think about (the future), which are more or less popular family in the database, and I have listed them centrally (not to enclose editing systems for families).

02.02.2011 15:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Two families in the database is not noticed, and the butterflies are there already. It: Dalceridae Sematuridae and should be added.

02.02.2011 13:54, Evgeny Komarov:

Butterflies and Moths of the World. Generic Names and their Type-species: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/butmoth/.

02.02.2011 13:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We have to think, or my eyes curves or Gumenyuk in monitor settings or drivers crooked. It is not necessary to pay attention in my opinion.

02.02.2011 13:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, it is normal Dawn I think I have.

02.02.2011 13:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Zorka photo on my desktop monitor is absolutely normal, as seen in this size. I take another look at the home.

02.02.2011 11:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

He completed the genus Graphium

02.02.2011 11:18, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, on the said transfer in the mail. Regarding structuring: it is for all the kits have enough strutkutrirovano: You go to the section of the Community "Guest / Blog / News" and where necessary topic comfortable hanging at the top.Basil, with regard to the removal of moderation: I think that's right, if at this stage carry with moderation in species and genera ready to Eugene. Today it doleplyu system that had such an opportunity.All request: Please look the latest photos Vitaly Gumenyuk - he says that in his blue on the monitor they go, especially photos Zorka, and I have everything OK - where necessary, an orange. Can you tell me how it is you do? I do not understand, or in case a monitor, or something I did not catch up ...

02.02.2011 10:04, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Returning to his proposal for structuring the "Community " sections. Here is an example - a useful theme "kit ", the institution Basil. It "ran away and had to get it, you need to scroll the page. But I know that such was. And any novice how? He did not know that there is such a useful reference.Think, please, still on it. And in the current Picture comments / all kinds of "sink ".

02.02.2011 9:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Palaearctic Arctiidae: http://www-sbras.nsc.ru/win/elbib/atlas/Arctiidae/.

02.02.2011 9:47, Evgeny Komarov:

Another test: Bears of the transfer of the genus Hebe Arctia, in which she was never seriously, in the genus Eucharia (with the addition of a new genus in the database). Everything OK, all the rules and tolerated. But the race to the catalog of misses - there is only the database. Peter! Yet it is desirable to have the right to transfer immediately to the directory - and then double the work, but you also keep track of the many changes / shifts.

02.02.2011 9:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Added to the database sort / views for unreported mind-Guyanese bears can be shot with moderation and transfer photos already. Now the addition of the remaining loans.

02.02.2011 8:47, Evgeny Komarov:

I tried until the transfer of species from one generation to another (armyworm Mythimna zeae in Leucania zeae). It seems to be no problem. The truth is the only picture him still "hanging " in my LC. And, since race is still "moderated, " my editing rights is not enough to deprive him of that status.

02.02.2011 6:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, I was at first base for the Bear loan. While the tropics, and later Palearctic.

02.02.2011 0:44, Peter Khramov:

Basic editing system database is ready for Eugene. Eugene request to test, all requested to observe if there are any glitches in the test: -) I pre-protest system, but little if anything.My last week in the brain liquefied state, recently won the whole geography of the photos have slept well that managed to restore ...

01.02.2011 22:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think you need to drive to the maximum until the name of the species. Then add subspecies. And cling to this photo. While sailing will drive, then take for whiteflies and Nymphalidae, if we do not mind. How will the system will drive the subspecies.

01.02.2011 22:29, Peter Khramov:

Yes, I also want to discuss the most urgent maintenance work on the site. I have a list emerges: Editing Systems moderators, View larger image Automatic login to the site system prostanovki points on the map and linking the photos to the map, the ability prostanovki Genus sp. and Family gen.And not only the species name for the picture, the possibility of commenting articles and supraspecific taxa English version of the site on the domain Lepidoptera.pro. Who thinks that - reportedly comment on or add to ...

01.02.2011 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, thank you, I did not know it simply, now I will. But resources are now oh how we need any.
Dmitry, is now a great deal of work for us and probably always will be. Therefore, no one will be left without it!

01.02.2011 22:15, Peter Khramov:

Oh, and about the families in determining the type on the photo. Offer or write directly to the family of the same comments as the name of the species, or do not write at all. Because as a moderator of the genus is still a family learns and questions he will not arise where this new kind of stick (because without the source, author, and a new genus, the general wind is hardly worth it).

01.02.2011 22:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Wai, the same access to the SATURN only through registration! Although it is simple. Well, on the above given link whatnot there.

01.02.2011 22:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Basil! On Saturn there are already long-standing and global resource: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/indexos.htm There's even somewhere my shots were :)

01.02.2011 22:06, Peter Khramov:

Dmitri, as what? Subspecies, as agreed. Editing Systems moderators are now in the process of Programming, today and tomorrow will be ready to at least one, and maybe even all.

01.02.2011 21:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And to me that what to do ???

01.02.2011 21:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way Saturn came yesterday (though not yet really yuzal): http://www.saturniidae-web.de/ Again Inet brakes (and thought).

01.02.2011 21:12, Evgeny Komarov:

Here I'm! In any case, the situation in the tropics, we rely on online resources, so I propose to discuss here the sources, who will take over "true " for one group or another. So far, we've got "permitted " bit. I believe that in the choice of credible resources, greater assistance can Vlad Proklov.And as for him mikrolepidoptera "flag in hand " we must give. I plan, in addition to the routine, put in order the European scoop on the basis of this work here: Michael FIBIGER and Hermann H. HACKER. Systematic List of the Noctuoidea of ​​Europe.
By the way, if anyone needs this article, I can lay out / send.
As soon as the bear, Basil! It is a quality resource - Tropical better yet did not find.To him even connect palearkticheskih http://www-sbras.nsc.ru/win/elbib/atlas/Arctiidae/ here and will be very good.
All ustakanilos gradually. Peter! Who will process and in its course will, if necessary, make adjustments. And, I hope, by expanding the range of "elite ".

01.02.2011 20:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

By the way here from the tropics in my last few Dalceridae found, and with them all the tube (in the world 84 species and almost no disk imaging). Hang neoprene. In my. This photo: 5052; 5036; 5020; 5019; 5018; 5017. depressing.

01.02.2011 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well bears for example I drive in here right now: http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/arct_guy.htm
On my site is pretty good. Roda something which has hammered (no species yet).

01.02.2011 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Regarding the driving, by the way. We must probably Eugene to know how it is more convenient: if possible, to more people drove, and he checked / confirmed or that he once drove. Eugene, ay, report ...
ZY Or do you need to first test the system redaktivaroniya base. It is also an option.

01.02.2011 20:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

While povbivayu bears that naopredelyali Guyana to the database (type I mean). If there is a buy on the Net is not the evening will allow (just pipe in the evenings comes at times).

01.02.2011 20:21, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it should be ...

01.02.2011 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK, Peter. I only logged when it is visible.

01.02.2011 20:11, Peter Khramov:

So here we Gauvreau that it needs private discussion. List of users who can view this topic: Alexander Zhakov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov Stanislav Korb, Irina Nikulin, Dmitry Pozhogin Vasily Feoktistov, Petr Khramov . All other site users, registered and not, do not see this topic.In the future, a list of people with access can increase (as usual, all obsuzhdaemo).
By default, this theme displays 25 of the latest comments. View all comments .

01.02.2011 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Idalus intermedia (Rothschild, 1909), seems to be one? Arctiidae.

01.02.2011 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

For the record: just added this genus, begin Arctiidae work (will check new genera added).

01.02.2011 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Final adding of family means that species is identified successfully.

01.02.2011 18:37, Peter Khramov:

Got it. So family info can be missed, since there will be detailed information uploaded from, for instance, funet.fi, with years, authors and stuff, to a new species added. If it's possible, please, add species to the database to support a little bit Evgeny Komarov who will take soon a big part of fuss with database...

01.02.2011 18:33, Evgeny Komarov:

Syssphinx molina ♂, (Cramer,1780), Saturniidae.

01.02.2011 18:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Automeris sp., Saturniidae.

01.02.2011 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Saturniidae female.

01.02.2011 18:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adeloneivaia boisduvalii (Doumet, 1859).

01.02.2011 17:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dalceridae.

01.02.2011 17:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that's it, the most similar to http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_02/texte/z_traili.htm.

01.02.2011 17:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

As for identifying, seems to be pure Zatrephes trailii (Butler, 1877).

01.02.2011 17:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Why??? I've just noticed family.

01.02.2011 17:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Noctuidae.

01.02.2011 17:18, Peter Khramov:

Hm, not Zatrephes trailii anymore?

01.02.2011 17:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arctiidae.

01.02.2011 17:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arctiidae.

01.02.2011 17:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arctiidae.

01.02.2011 17:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arctiidae.

01.02.2011 17:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arctiidae.

01.02.2011 17:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arctiidae.

01.02.2011 17:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 17:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 17:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 17:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 17:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 17:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 17:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 17:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 17:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 17:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 17:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 17:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

01.02.2011 15:43, Evgeny Komarov:

No doubts, I think! Male.

01.02.2011 15:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acraga infusa [Schaus 1905]?

01.02.2011 14:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Celiptera levina (Stoll, 1782)?

01.02.2011 14:26, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:26, Evgeny Komarov:

No doubts, this is true Letis herilia ♂, (Stoll, 1780). Noctuidae.

01.02.2011 14:21, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:20, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:20, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 14:17, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve Lophocampa maroniensis.

01.02.2011 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That is the very underside (I was wrong), mishmash.

01.02.2011 14:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be Semaeopus subtincta, Warren, 1897.

01.02.2011 14:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Why version? Underside is ok!

01.02.2011 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Looks like one of its versions. See the similar one: http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Noctuidae/Guy%2001181_modi1-s3.jpg.

01.02.2011 13:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

01.02.2011 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, and I do too. Peter, are clearing the site!

01.02.2011 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Obvious Arctiidae, something like Lophocampa maroniensis???

01.02.2011 13:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter, get out some of Guyana, and that I am confused.

01.02.2011 13:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whew, thank God. God forbid this clean up!

01.02.2011 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Unavailable.

01.02.2011 12:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Approve. Idalus aleteria (Schaus, 1905).

01.02.2011 12:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That's right, Hemeroblemma opigena.

01.02.2011 12:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

May be Antiblemma trogocycla, Hampson, 1926, but sooo questionable.

01.02.2011 12:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sericoptera mahometaria, Herrich-Schäffer, [1853].

01.02.2011 12:21, Evgeny Komarov:

Looks alike.

01.02.2011 12:17, Evgeny Komarov:

This one is even more similar to Antiblemma orbiculata than #5071.

01.02.2011 12:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hemeroblemma dolosa male, Hübner, [1823] (no suggestions more).

01.02.2011 12:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same as #5071, I think, or something close to.

01.02.2011 12:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Antiblemma orbiculata (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1874)?

01.02.2011 11:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, still have those?

01.02.2011 11:23, Evgeny Komarov:

I think, that is Hemeroblemma opigena pandrosa ♂, (Cramer, 1776): http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Noctuidae/Guy%2000571-s3.jpg. Dmitry, seems you wanted to comment another shot, #5077?

01.02.2011 11:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Noctuidae.

01.02.2011 11:10, Evgeny Komarov:

Noctuidae.

01.02.2011 11:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Hemeroblemma opigena pandrosa ♂, (Cramer, 1776).

01.02.2011 11:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve!

01.02.2011 10:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Letis ? herilia ♂, (Stoll, 1780).

01.02.2011 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

May be http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_01/texte/r_klages.htm or something close to.

01.02.2011 10:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Think, this is Robinsonia sp. (Arctiidae).

01.02.2011 10:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Seems to be Synchlora gerularia, Hübner, [1823].

01.02.2011 9:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve Leuciris fimbriaria!

01.02.2011 9:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve Leuciris fimbriaria!

01.02.2011 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Va banque: Leuciris fimbriaria, Stoll, 1781.

01.02.2011 9:32, Evgeny Komarov:

That's it, that's it!

01.02.2011 9:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Araeomolis rubens (Schaus, 1905), Arctiidae, Arctiinae.

01.02.2011 9:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be (who knows, this is America however).

01.02.2011 9:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pure Arctiidae. Cresera ilioides (Schaus, 1905)?

01.02.2011 9:06, Evgeny Komarov:

Why not Idalus aleteria (Schaus, 1905)? Looks like its copy and so brand-new compared to this one of collection http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_01/texte/i_aleter.htm.

01.02.2011 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Evgeny, try to add a comment, see "thanks for adding" or something like that, after that press "back" button in your browser and see your comment still in the field, ready to be uploaded again. I think, that's the reason of this mess.

01.02.2011 8:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Yes, that's right! Using Opera also!

01.02.2011 8:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Let's leave Idalus sp. then (species is still questionable).

01.02.2011 8:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same is here! Using Opera browser. Maybe that's because a comment is still in field even after having been uploaded.

01.02.2011 0:53, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, seems you reload also the webpage and re-upload info once more then. I will fix that it would be impossible to double info reloading the webpage...

01.02.2011 0:52, Peter Khramov:

Thanks - their authors: Vitaly Gumenyuk and Evgeny Komarov.

31.01.2011 23:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Guess, that is Idalus herois, just much worn-out.

31.01.2011 22:34, Evgeny Komarov:

This one is for sure of the same crew as #5049! Guys! This is the very tropical South America! You are too picky to web databases and shots :)

31.01.2011 22:29, Evgeny Komarov:

Pressing "reload" and have comment added!

31.01.2011 22:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Eacles penelope (Cramer, 1775), imho.

31.01.2011 22:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I checked all Idalus also. No way.

31.01.2011 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same is here: what if this one is Arctiidae such as #5049 and 5050? Can't find same though.

31.01.2011 22:16, Evgeny Komarov:

Eacles penelope (Cramer, 1775), imho.

31.01.2011 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably, but such "portraits" were already there before. Author's opinion, please?

31.01.2011 22:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Idalus coacta (Dognin, 1902), or something like that.

31.01.2011 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eupsodosoma larissa (Druce, 1890).

31.01.2011 21:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Guess, this is #5079.

31.01.2011 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

How can it be identified by this photo, huh?

31.01.2011 21:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Letis herilia (Stoll, 1780).

31.01.2011 21:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Most probably Tachyphyle albisparsa, Warren, 1907.

31.01.2011 21:34, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Schausiella polybia (Stoll, 1781).

31.01.2011 21:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Phrudocentra janeira (Schaus, 1897).

31.01.2011 21:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oospila albicoma (Felder & Rogenhofer, 1875).

31.01.2011 21:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Synchlora gerularia, Hübner, 1823.

31.01.2011 21:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Synchlora gerularia, Hübner, 1823.

31.01.2011 21:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thysania agrippina (Cramer, 1776).

31.01.2011 21:23, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Thysania agrippina (Cramer, 1776).

31.01.2011 21:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Copiopteryx semiramis (Cramer,1775).

31.01.2011 21:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Copiopteryx semiramis (Cramer,1775).

31.01.2011 21:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rothschildia aurota (Cramer, 1775).

31.01.2011 21:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rothschildia aurota male (Cramer,1775).

31.01.2011 21:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Idalus carinosa, Schaus, 1905.

31.01.2011 21:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Gorgonidia buckleyi whitfordi, Rothschild, 1909.

31.01.2011 21:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Synchlora gerularia, Hübner, 1823.

31.01.2011 21:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zatrephes trailii (Butler, 1877).

31.01.2011 21:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zatrephes trailii (Butler, 1877).

31.01.2011 20:50, Peter Khramov:

New pictures of the same author are now available in the gallery site ...

31.01.2011 19:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that's it for sure.

31.01.2011 19:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well, then Arctiidae ---Amaxia consistens Schaus, 1905.

31.01.2011 17:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lepidoptera.pro only. Species is also questionable (only Notodontidae sure): http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_notodontidae_2.htm.

31.01.2011 17:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What's source?

31.01.2011 16:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Genus can be but can't find species (somewhat tough).

31.01.2011 16:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Lasiocampidae genus Tolype ????

31.01.2011 16:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, I think you do right. I also tried to find in Citheronia, had no luck but success in Arctiidae.

31.01.2011 15:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think, that should be Arctiidae ---Amaxia consistens Schaus, 1905.

31.01.2011 15:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sematuridae.

31.01.2011 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sematuridae.

31.01.2011 15:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Noctuidae.

31.01.2011 15:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Geometridae.

31.01.2011 15:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sphingidae.

31.01.2011 15:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arctiidae.

31.01.2011 15:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Limacodidae.

31.01.2011 15:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Limacodidae.

31.01.2011 15:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Arctiidae.

31.01.2011 15:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Notodontidae.

31.01.2011 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Notodontidae.

31.01.2011 15:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Notodontidae.

31.01.2011 15:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Arctiidae.

31.01.2011 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Arctiidae.

31.01.2011 15:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Only Letis iphianasse can have such purple bleeds, as far as I know. May be not feature though.

31.01.2011 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Deal on that. Now it's gonna be signed where to put what to arrange it properly. This one to Arctiidae.

31.01.2011 15:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

There Evgeny is right, this one is Othorene hodeva male, (Druce, 1904).

31.01.2011 14:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Still, this is Epimolis incarnata male (Hampson, 1901).

31.01.2011 14:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 14:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suggested this also (failed to find any other).

31.01.2011 14:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, Vasily is right: Ormetica contraria, Walker, 1854.

31.01.2011 14:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No any more similar than Zatrephes trailii (Butler, 1877).

31.01.2011 14:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Zatrephes trailii (Butler, 1877)???

31.01.2011 14:07, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Arctiidae 100% sure, Ormetica genus 90% sure.

31.01.2011 14:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Better to get the species description. But only Epimolis incarnata might have a white spot on its abdomen. Albeit, it may just match accidentally, but we've got already the genus what's good anyway.

31.01.2011 13:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Need to look at its hind wings (what's possible, alas), but it's obviously something of mentioned.

31.01.2011 13:45, Evgeny Komarov:

Also tend to think that's Epimolis incarnata male, but need to know how much it can vary. Doubtful to judge by just one item, even collected, as well as by photo...

31.01.2011 13:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, that's it.

31.01.2011 13:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Antaea juturna, [Cramer,1777]?

31.01.2011 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hey, these tropics are a real brainstorm. Bet this one is some Arctiidae, for sure. Something like Ormetica sp. ?contraria (Walker, 1854)? Dunno.

31.01.2011 13:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Rather looks like Epimolis incarnata (Hampson, 1901).

31.01.2011 13:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So similar to Epimolis incisa (Rothschild, 1909). Weird, I can go there even with Dr Web and Outpost.

31.01.2011 12:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suggest species, will check it out. www.inra.fr is infected, my computer doesn't let me in.

31.01.2011 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe, its male: http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_03/texte/e_incisa.htm.

31.01.2011 12:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to be something close to http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/boite_02/texte/z_traili.htm.

31.01.2011 12:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zatrephes sp.

31.01.2011 12:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That's it for sure.

31.01.2011 12:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also of local Arctiidae: http://www.inra.fr/internet/Produits/PAPILLON/arct_guy/arct_guy.htm.

31.01.2011 12:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, sooner.

31.01.2011 12:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:15, Peter Khramov:

Obviously, this is the same as http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/4979/...

31.01.2011 12:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 12:14, Evgeny Komarov:

Approve Letis. Just saw Ascalapha first ;). As for species, hm, hm, cause this crew has so volatile patterns...

31.01.2011 12:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Black witch Ascalapha odorata has always clearly seen "glasses" at its hind wings. Can't see such there.

31.01.2011 12:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Such angles are nothing but guesswork, you should know fauna to identify it.

31.01.2011 12:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think, rather Letis iphianasse (Cramer, 1777).

31.01.2011 11:43, Evgeny Komarov:

Looks like Ascalapha odorata (Linnaeus, 1758) - http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Noctuidae/Guy%2002367-s3.jpg.

31.01.2011 11:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Something from Letis genus???

31.01.2011 11:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that is minor, wings confused me.

31.01.2011 11:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Looks similar to Neonerita marpessa.

31.01.2011 11:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Rosema minor, Draudt, 1934. Vasily! Look at the color of the forewing spots and the shape of its apical parts. Dorsalis has black ones with concave apical parts.

31.01.2011 11:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is also Paradaemonia???

31.01.2011 11:03, Evgeny Komarov:

Hm, if only Oxytenis mirabilis ♀, (Cramer,[1780]), and even this doesn't suit well. This our photo should be looked through in a large size, not this miniature.

31.01.2011 10:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Starting with these three:
1) http://www.guianensis.fr/ (actual now)
2) http://www.saturniidae-web.de/ (of Saturniidae)
3) http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/ (a good website about butterflies).

31.01.2011 10:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We happen to need such for identifying stuff. So I open this special subj where we may share ours (what's found somewhere).

31.01.2011 10:24, Evgeny Komarov:

Suggestion: Othorene hodeva ♂, (Druce, 1904), the same Ceratocampinae. http://www.guianensis.fr/images/Saturniidae/Ceratocampinae/Guy%2000686_mod-1-s3.jpg.

31.01.2011 10:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Notodontidae, Hemiceras sp. (emerillonarum Thiaucourt, 1987)?

31.01.2011 10:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Then Paradaemonia samba (Schaus, 1906) only.

31.01.2011 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Evgeny, how you guessed: checking this website right now!

31.01.2011 9:59, Evgeny Komarov:

Worth checking it out, e. g. there: http://www.guianensis.fr/.

31.01.2011 8:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rosema dorsalis, Walker 1855.

31.01.2011 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Imho, the same as #4995.

31.01.2011 8:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Limacodidae: Miresa clarissa, (Stoll, 1790), female.

31.01.2011 7:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Probably, Synchlora gerularia, Hübner, 1823.

31.01.2011 6:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, its male and female (4992), but Sematura or Nothus? http://www.guianensis.fr/photos_sematuridae.htm#top.

31.01.2011 1:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Maybe, something of Oxytenis genus???

31.01.2011 1:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If that is butterfly at all???

31.01.2011 1:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

My old friend Hyalurga fenestra, (Linnaeus, 1758).

31.01.2011 0:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

A. jason female (Boisduval, 1872).

31.01.2011 0:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Seems to be Paradaemonia.

31.01.2011 0:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Dysdaemonia boreas male (Cramer, 1775)????

31.01.2011 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suggest Hylesia gyrex, Dyar, 1913.

31.01.2011 0:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Suggest Hylesia gyrex, Dyar, 1913.

31.01.2011 0:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And this one is Therinia buckleyi male (Druce, 1890), Saturniidae.

31.01.2011 0:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, again Evgeny is right!!! Dysdaemonia boreas 100% sure (Cramer, 1775).

31.01.2011 0:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Eacles penelope (Cramer,1775).

31.01.2011 0:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Definite Adeloneivaia, but can't name the species.

31.01.2011 0:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Nominative.

31.01.2011 0:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

31.01.2011 0:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Approve Eacles imperialis cacicus (Boisduval, 1868).

31.01.2011 0:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Pure Protambulyx and looks like goeldii (Rothschild & Jordan, 1903). Not 100% sure though.

30.01.2011 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Yes, the rest of it are also night ones.

30.01.2011 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined".

30.01.2011 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined".

30.01.2011 19:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

30.01.2011 19:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, that is Agraulis vanillae.

30.01.2011 7:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Considering forms: http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Amazon%20-%20Agraulis%20vanillae.htm.

30.01.2011 7:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://www.learnaboutbutterflies.com/Amazon%20-%20Adelpha%20mesentina.htm.

30.01.2011 7:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The rest of it are also night (Heterocera)? Hard to identify. Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea are way easier to do! By the way, these two can be identified by the shot location.

30.01.2011 0:36, Peter Khramov:

Few more for a definite brain concussion ;--)

29.01.2011 21:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Was thinking, pondering.......
Hard cases: lots of South American species, night, undetermined. Brainstorm, no less.

29.01.2011 21:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Vasily, absolutely right, first run! No other suggestions!

29.01.2011 13:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sematura lunus male, Linnaeus, 1758 (not 100% sure).

29.01.2011 13:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sematura lunus female, Linnaeus, 1758 (have no suggestions more).

29.01.2011 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Something so close to #4991.

29.01.2011 13:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rather Apoprogoninae/Sematurinae/Sematura sp./ lunus Linnaeus, 1758?

29.01.2011 11:25, Evgeny Komarov:

It is perfectly!

29.01.2011 11:13, Evgeny Komarov:

Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae. Something very close to genus Citheronia (W.Rothschild, 1907), or maybe that's the very it.

29.01.2011 10:53, Evgeny Komarov:

Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae. Something like Syssphinx (Hubner, 1819) - Rachesa (Michener, 1949).

29.01.2011 10:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Saturniidae, Arsenurinae, something close to Copaxa genus, Walker, 1855.

29.01.2011 10:42, Peter Khramov:

The idea is correct, I have it already incorporated in the list of future additions.

29.01.2011 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uraniidae.

29.01.2011 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uraniidae.

29.01.2011 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sphingidae.

29.01.2011 10:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The thing!

29.01.2011 10:17, Evgeny Komarov:

As I see it, it is for the site to the possibility of placing images that are not defined to the species level, but surely determined to genus or family at least, in the appropriate taxonomic groups. Iewhile watching some kind / family / subfamily (when there are) could be seen and photos relating to these taxonomic groups, but not to certain species. Especially important for the exotic, but for at least the Palearctic. To all unidentified does not lie in a heap.A pile of something will grow, so the more structured it is, the easier it will be a specialist in the group immediately see undetermined species of the family / subfamily / kind. The idea emerged when trying to deal with the Guyana pictures, although earlier in the head "cool ".

29.01.2011 10:01, Peter Khramov:

Will the Lord will razmerchik. I think that within the next week master.

29.01.2011 9:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter and all the "night "? Hard to deal with the US. And Eugene rights: the preview to do.

29.01.2011 9:50, Evgeny Komarov:

Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae, Eacles sp., looks like E. penelope (Cramer, 1775).

29.01.2011 9:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adelpha mesentina male (Cramer, 1777).

29.01.2011 9:40, Evgeny Komarov:

Saturniidae, Arsenurinae, Dysdaemonia genus (Hubner, 1819), species may be boreas, Cramer, 1775.

29.01.2011 9:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae, genus Adeloneivaia (Travassos, 1940), as for species, may be A. jason (Boisduval, 1872), just may be ...

29.01.2011 9:27, Evgeny Komarov:

It was then, and hinders our razmerchik shots - a lot will not be considered, and therefore do not understand - why there nasnyato. ;)

29.01.2011 9:25, Evgeny Komarov:

Rescintia hyppodamia, Cramer, 1777. Saturniidae, Arsenurinae.

29.01.2011 9:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Seems to be one of Eacles imperialis subspecies, sooner cacicus (Boisduval, 1868). Saturniidae, Ceratocampinae subfamily.

29.01.2011 9:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Agraulis vanillae (Linnaeus 1758).

29.01.2011 3:19, Peter Khramov:

The first batch of pictures from Konstantin Kuharevskogo of 41 pieces. Later will be released a few dozen. Messrs who is able to determine that - Wellcome in comments to fotam.

29.01.2011 3:06, Peter Khramov:

Restored.

29.01.2011 0:44, Peter Khramov:

Thanks to my talent is now flew above information. I will try to recover.

28.01.2011 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Dmitri now finish systems for editing subspecies, species and others, as well as additional information in the photographs. Soon I completed yet, and Yevgeny Komarov try to do editing base, including Troides, etc.

28.01.2011 0:29, Andrey Sazykin:

Basil, in this case I'm talking about myself - that I should see the source. Moreover, to my shame, I was on the NYT site authorized ..

27.01.2011 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So the point is that never asked (not to be named, the main news file). Andrew, if you want, Temko read: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=195961

27.01.2011 22:29, Andrey Sazykin:

Well, then I do not agree. Just have to see the source and look in the directory. Ask someone who knows.

27.01.2011 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And it is always so. In the words of Professor Preobrazhensky: "Do not read Soviet newspapers before dinner, " Bormental: "And if there are no? " Transfiguration: "So no, and do not read. " Gold words!

27.01.2011 22:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And it is always so. In the words of Professor Preobrazhensky: "Do not read Soviet newspapers before dinner, " Bormental: "And if there are no? " Transfiguration: "So no, and do not read. " Gold words!

27.01.2011 22:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! It is necessary to remove from the genus Troides
Troides arfakensis - moderated
Troides goliath - moderated
Troides rothschildi - moderated
Troides tithonus - moderated
Troides victoriae - moderated
Troides priamus
Troides brookiana

27.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The article itself is correct, only a mistranslation killed.

27.01.2011 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It is understandable, but it is not necessary to forget "soul burns ".

27.01.2011 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Debited from the English books: Polyommatus icarus - "Common blue "; Plebejus argus - "Silver-studded blue "; Lyssandra bellargus - "Adonis blue ", etc. etc., and blue Polyommatus not exist in nature. More generally, however :). Originals pancake.

27.01.2011 22:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I have to transfer in ready delivery

27.01.2011 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And brukianu of troidesov Trogonoptera in my opinion is also necessary.

27.01.2011 21:57, Andrey Sazykin:

Yeah, well that is posted here, I had taken it at face value :)

27.01.2011 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zhurnalyugi-word. They really do not wonder. In fact: to read newspapers and listen to the news was bad, however.

27.01.2011 20:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/01/science/01butterfly.html?_r=2- original The New York Times, 25.01.2011
And our newspaper people from the English word copper-butterfly (blues) made a new kind of
"butterfly-type copper-butterfly Polyommatus blues " "In particular, the scientists analyzed the DNA of P. blues, caught in America and Europe. "
insanity and amateurishness.

27.01.2011 20:34, Andrey Sazykin:

http://www.lenta.ru/news/2011/01/27/nabokov/

27.01.2011 19:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

It left to finish (bring to mind) Atrophaneura + Pachliopta, Chilasa, Eurytides + Neographium, Graphium, Meandrusa, Ornithoptera (transfer from troydesov), Papilio, Parnassius, Troides ..

27.01.2011 19:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

We made all kinds in the following childbirth
Allancastria, Archon, Baronia, Battus, Bhutanitis, Cressida, Euryades, Hypermnestra, Iphiclides, Lamproptera, Luehdorfia, Parides, Pharmacophagus, Sericinus, Teinopalpus, Trogonoptera (need to move Trogonoptera brookiana of the genus Troides), Zerynthia (must be removed Zerynthia cretica and Zerynthia cerisy - they are of a kind Allancastria)

27.01.2011 19:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I have finished the race. Still have questions in the following species-subspecies Parides perrhebus, Parides damocrates, Parides steinbachi, Parides kuhlmani, Parides polyzelus. Who has specific information about it, please write.

27.01.2011 11:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved to io.

27.01.2011 11:05, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to stellatarum.

27.01.2011 11:04, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

27.01.2011 5:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Chiasmia clathrata (=Semiothisa clathrata) (Linnaeus, 1758).

27.01.2011 5:42, Evgeny Komarov:

Macroglossum stellatarum (Linnaeus, 1758).

27.01.2011 2:41, Alexandr Zhakov:

Inachis io (Linnaeus, 1758), common feeding on nettles.

27.01.2011 2:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved to icarus.

27.01.2011 2:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus, Rottemburg, 1775.

26.01.2011 23:50, Peter Khramov:

From Hope Flegontova, Sergei Novitsky, Viktor Titov, Alexander and Oleg Goncharov Zhakova.

26.01.2011 18:42, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, photos were published or not? If not - gone is 23 (or after) or before?

26.01.2011 16:41, Eugene Davkaev:

Of my three loaded Diacrisia sannio I see only the first picture.

26.01.2011 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2001/05/06.

26.01.2011 14:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 1998/06/17.

26.01.2011 14:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 1998/06/17.

26.01.2011 14:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2001/06/13.

26.01.2011 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 1996/05/26.

26.01.2011 14:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2002/07/29.

26.01.2011 14:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 1996/06/22.

26.01.2011 14:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2001/07/11 (emersion).

26.01.2011 14:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2001/07/02 (emersion).

26.01.2011 14:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2001/08/23.

26.01.2011 14:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 1998/08/02 (raised one), males were arriving to this female in crowds.

26.01.2011 14:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 1998/08/02.

26.01.2011 14:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2000/09/11 (raised, second brood).

26.01.2011 13:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 1999/04/18 (raised one).

26.01.2011 13:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 1999/10/06.

26.01.2011 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2002/07/02.

26.01.2011 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2002/07/02.

26.01.2011 13:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Date: 2001/07/11.

26.01.2011 13:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

The same: second date = when was caught.

26.01.2011 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caught date: 2007/07/27 (shot date to be deleted).

26.01.2011 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shot date: 2009/05/18.

26.01.2011 13:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shot date: 06/08/2005 (typo).

26.01.2011 13:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Checking right now my shot dates (noticing wrongly signed). Should be corrected, that is crucial!

26.01.2011 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

There is the shot date of this butterfly escaping from its cocoon.

26.01.2011 13:09, Peter Khramov:

Natalia, thanks for noticing, corrected.

26.01.2011 12:59, Natalia Demchenko:

Not cataloged.

25.01.2011 23:20, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and Gentlemen! In the foreseeable future it will be out of the English version of the site. Therefore - need a competent translator from Russian to American English and vice versa.

Activity



The program is a minimum - I'll brush you made further transfers
The program maximum - to be translated from Russian to American English without me

Well,if you



distinguish between "individual" and "species" without the use of a dictionary
At least a little know Latin
indifferent to butterflies

Poor,if you



is usually translated phrase "all these men and women " as "all these men and women»
translate "problem " as a "problem" more than three times in a row
In most cases, translate "species " as a "special»

Of interest paid and free offers from professionals and advanced amateurs retracted.Write on e-mail specified at the bottom of each page. Ps. In fact, the text for translation as such, especially in the initial phase, will be not so much - more overhead phrases for navigation, header templates, etc. Z.Z.Y.If you want to do this business, but there are doubts concerning the competence of the transfer sites of biological orientation - you can simply try to translate the text on the home page of any amendments to skid, do not distort the meaning of ...

25.01.2011 22:48, Peter Khramov:

There is « New records of Lepidoptera protected (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in the Yaroslavl region »and« Reflection weather anomalies 2010 on phenology Lepidoptera (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Yaroslavl region ». Thus, the number of articles on the website increased half -)

25.01.2011 22:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Adult caterpillar (last age).

25.01.2011 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This is Cerura vinula young caterpillar (third age). It will be growing for a very long time before pupation.

25.01.2011 22:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

25.01.2011 15:07, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

25.01.2011 9:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, this one is truly pyramidea. Will upload pyramidea today (think, I've got one).

24.01.2011 23:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Support Natalia in hesitating, since the last spur is a little bit short. Suggest Amphipyra pyramidea.

24.01.2011 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And my guess is A. berbera, look: http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=403950&view=findpost&p=1072734. Anyway, these two are always confused. Let's wait for other suggestions.

24.01.2011 21:47, Natalia Demchenko:

Yet may be Amphipyra pyramidea...

23.01.2011 23:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Correctly! Though a file txt. I keep these things, but still welcome.

23.01.2011 23:46, Peter Khramov:

One of the next additions - Optional user memory (as is the case in standard forums).

23.01.2011 23:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In principle, a login to the periodic violet once (password manager in the opera I remember correctly if you press the key). But it would be desirable to press him too seldom (until cookies are not purged).

23.01.2011 23:19, Peter Khramov:

OK got it. I was important to find out at what stage without login go - whether from the outset, whether the long window is not updated. Now it is possible to clarify.

23.01.2011 21:58, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter. With zalogirovaniem me all right, I answered quickly. As noted above, every time you need to enter the new, if for a long time during the day not worked. Fasilily. With the dates I have all normal. But not once met with cameras, where the date is not set. This theoretically. I also think that among us there are none. We date is important.

23.01.2011 19:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, just for a mandatory rule to take always drive a date manually (if available), regardless of the source or exif label.

23.01.2011 19:02, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr Khramov, 18:03 23.01.2011
Here on this issue and I thought. Probably it is necessary to load the box and it is for the "Dummies " once to register.

23.01.2011 19:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, I have all the pictures are in the database for Daddy, the title of which year / month / date in the first place. Hence, any picture in a place defined simply: look in the exif date, and then place the photos in the database. When filming a season of several thousand, without this in any way.

23.01.2011 18:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I add Alexander, but the clock is necessary in the chamber to stand forever. Say: filmed in the insect several years ago, but only now uploaded. Exif is very helpful in such cases.

23.01.2011 18:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Normal: everything was back in place.

23.01.2011 18:16, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, the likelihood of transfer of any software errors on the site is reduced. But in general, I try to. Although, of course, is not very well keep up with photographers; -)

23.01.2011 18:13, Peter Khramov:

Correct his previous message. ZY Alexander, and what you have to login to the system on the site, why do not you go? ..

23.01.2011 18:08, :

And if Cameras is not set the clock? It is always better that it were possible to change the date and time manually.

23.01.2011 18:08, Evgeny Komarov:

Already written - all OK! Peter, endure more quickly from the place of LC - something hurts "nervous " The situation on the site;)

23.01.2011 18:05, Evgeny Komarov:

So Nicholas and wrote about it. The truth should be an opportunity for "manual " I leave. Otherwise it will be the shooting of collection specimens. from exif. It is best left as it is - and then there will be problems. It is better to remain with the extra work load.

23.01.2011 18:03, Peter Khramov:

Try this: If the date / time field is left blank, infa taken from Exif'a (if possible) If the date / time field is filled, infa taken out of the field, even in when there Exif Ie. field always have priority over Exif'om, and the latter is used only when the field is empty.The only problem that can be - when a person does not fill the field (because I do not remember the date of gear), and shooting date Exif'e dried instance. This situation will also need to somehow handle.

23.01.2011 18:01, Peter Khramov:

So, all the information is restored. Please check that all in all are now normally appears in the loaded image.

23.01.2011 18:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, it all came back!

23.01.2011 17:31, Peter Khramov:

It's not so terrible to see. Http://lepidoptera.ru/community/2133/

23.01.2011 17:29, Peter Khramov:

Everything is OK. See the news http://lepidoptera.ru/community/2133/

23.01.2011 17:27, Peter Khramov:

Messrs, this situation can actually take place. Download all required again - with a probability of 99% today, all I can fix it.

23.01.2011 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Because of Exif (a) for a photo in nature, I made it, and hammered into the field (watch something in the camera there). But for specimen collection. label taxis. Manual field is required.

23.01.2011 17:00, Nikolai Vladimirov:

There is a proposal to obtain this information from exif`a. And if that is not present (a scanned photo or anything else) - then leave the template to fill in manually.

23.01.2011 16:57, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Agree. Last uploaded 21 photo - Today in the new audio ... Previous uploaded on the site.

23.01.2011 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Oh, I do not envy you, Eugene. I had just re-label lift (collectible almost all).

23.01.2011 16:35, Evgeny Komarov:

You easily;) And pour sixty-something ...

23.01.2011 16:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also I hope (all sources are I can and pour very seriously).

23.01.2011 16:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Well, it took me a while to nowhere about 60 photos of LK. I hope that this Peter their shifts. If not, then this is a serious bug. But I inclined to the first option. I hope while I live!

23.01.2011 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Namely the absence of all previously downloaded photos (including recent). I have them today I have disappeared all at once. It would be desirable to find out how things are going with all this. Strange things happen any.
Quote: Pending publication

Images in the step of selecting and processing (0).If necessary, edit the text fields (from top to bottom: Name of the species (AutoFit); refinement (Form subspecies) Date and time of the shooting / fishing (pattern YYYY-MM-DD HH-MM-SS) Location shooting / fishing; Additional Information ) and click "Update and Delete ... "
And there were 14 (no file).

23.01.2011 15:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And the entire archive "gone forever. " Pour the last 14?

23.01.2011 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I now have all the LC kudato left (photo 14). So it should be?

23.01.2011 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Fixed a situation where the value of the "Disabled pictures " in the gallery did not correspond to the present state of affairs.

23.01.2011 13:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one is a real Diachrysia chrysitis there (the rest are all D. stenochrysis). Should be cleared.

23.01.2011 13:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

23.01.2011 12:34, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

23.01.2011 12:30, Peter Khramov:

Sometimes I skip some images waiting for the species activating. Done.

23.01.2011 10:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Wrong. This one is Scopula decorata.

23.01.2011 0:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why such are not catalogued, just databased, even with photos and proper identifying?

22.01.2011 22:52, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

22.01.2011 20:56, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

22.01.2011 20:56, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

22.01.2011 20:55, Alexandr Zhakov:

No subspecies can be identified with this photo. There are some similar species in the south of Ukraine, so no more than just a brainstorm.

22.01.2011 20:40, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

22.01.2011 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

22.01.2011 20:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775).

22.01.2011 20:36, Alexandr Zhakov: This species is identified correctly.

22.01.2011 19:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shot date is wrong. Right: 28/07/1996 (checked label).

22.01.2011 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Procedure for otpishu here that now everything is OK, and hoster corrected. Although the corresponding news was published on the website before.

22.01.2011 13:17, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved, species added.

22.01.2011 13:13, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

22.01.2011 13:13, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

22.01.2011 13:12, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, it may make sense. But from them need infa for their registration on the site as the authors (as in the registration form). Ie they can send it, and it is better - just registered with the site. A foty already can not ship if you mean that you can simply pull off some of the site (with their consent).

22.01.2011 10:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

22.01.2011 10:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

21.01.2011 23:30, Alexandr Zhakov:

Sclerocona acutella (Eversmann, 1842).

21.01.2011 23:25, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Does it make sense to ask you and ask Facebook poyuzat their photos on the site (mostly exotic) ???

21.01.2011 23:24, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, up to you - you think is interesting. And also - if there is a picture for the species that is in the database, but which has not yet posted any illustrations - that they would.

21.01.2011 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, in the near future - a section with commentary relating to a particular user (so as not to miss the theme, which is his messages, photos, etc.) With regard to the new backlight - will have to think about, too, but at this stage, assuming should be sufficient separation on the blog / news, photos and Forms, as well as section of their comments.

21.01.2011 23:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter how family / genus Activities ??? while I can sit povbivat views.

21.01.2011 23:11, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'm sorry, I forgot to put a smiley face. :). Discrimination - this is a joke.
The main thing is the place photo / fishing should be specified as much as possible cases, but you can not do it obligatory. We are with you, Eugene, say the same thing. Our view is the same.

21.01.2011 22:58, Peter Khramov:

No, it is not. Now all it transferred to the new server, and nothing better not wait. Ie Now you can safely load and photos, and comments and everything else.

21.01.2011 22:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! I no longer even on the other. This is the discussion after his post I just missed - saw just now.
I mean, to going to the "community ", can be seen - in which topics (sections) have any new messages and new themes emerged. IeCome on in, I see new topics, as well as the older ones among them, where my last visit there are new posts. Now, if you come here a couple of days, the chance to miss something interesting is great.And if a couple of weeks? I can not judge how to do this - I, alas, the user :) So if you want too much, let it be as it is. There are more important issues.

21.01.2011 22:20, Evgeny Komarov:

Alexander Zhakov, 21-01-2011 21:43
"Why should offer discrimination exotic countries? "
It's not about diskriminatsii.U my collection has a number of exotic species that have been obtained either without labels or with very approximate.Tellingly, this is a purely commercial species supplied to Russia in different ways, but their species, as a rule, is beyond doubt. Subspecies, yes - but this, to be honest, it is not so important for us here and for the site, which pay attention to it does not make sense.There are many serious of foreign sites, specializing in the "zabugornoy " fauna. Embark on a par with them is not possible for objective reasons, and most importantly, it is not necessary. Let there will be butterflies from around the world, but the basis of the site and its goal - our Palaearctic (the maximum), and Russian (at least) of the butterfly.If we can realize at least at a high level, then the site will be live and will enjoy the necessary popular. The main thing - a healthy balance between scientism and accessibility to non-specialists.And you need research interest is the site level professionals and advanced amateurs - not experts, but interested, they will come. But first will determine the fate of the resource.
Here is a long explanation about discrimination tropics)

21.01.2011 21:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

Why propose discrimination exotic countries? Even here there were problems with the definition because of ignorance of the country's fishing, island-specific, and others. But it is highly desirable, but it should not be mandatory, and that unfair (I hope there are none), photographers can put anything you like.

21.01.2011 21:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

As I understand it, it makes it possible to recent events, a photo is not necessary to load and update until. This is true???

21.01.2011 21:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eugene, I fully agree with you!

21.01.2011 21:08, Evgeny Komarov:

I accept as a starting point. In the development of the website, I think, in any case we arrive at the optimal solution.Otherwise - no way :) But still, for a field indicating the geography should prescribe something like this: "For species collected / photographed in the former USSR, this information is required (at least Republic / province / region). Photo not accompanied by such information will not be accepted for placement on the site.For photos of exotic species can be accommodated without the collection point / shooting. "The proposed text to be discussed!

21.01.2011 20:26, Peter Khramov:

In summary: Only deleted files without the geography, desperate to identify and thus none with TZ Photo. All other files, view butterfly which is not defined, remain. Field indicating the geography stands on the download page, but is not mandatory.If there are any objections to such an option - I ask to speak.

21.01.2011 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, I see, thank you.

21.01.2011 20:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved again.

21.01.2011 19:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Added title

21.01.2011 19:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, tomorrow I look. OK? Today confuse some (now meeting was unpleasant), and I am now somewhat inadequate.

21.01.2011 18:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one is Nymphalis polychloros.

21.01.2011 15:48, Evgeny Komarov:

Especially because now we can not, and in a month will go "cool " a specialist who knows the fauna of the region (mandatory indication of the place again) and determine. Another thing, if in a picture, for example, one head of unknown moth ... These are the pictures just do not need.

21.01.2011 15:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I'm not talking about maps, I'm talking about mandatory fields location shooting / fishing.
If a species can not be determined - can determine gender, we can determine the approximate list of species for a photo. And suddenly this genus and species from this place, not given above ???

21.01.2011 15:26, Peter Khramov:

As to how to store - the question is not biological, and programmer's. If someone has a desire to discuss this position - Wellcome, let's discuss. The biological question - as it is shown on this website (this is no problem, the brackets will, as I mentioned above), as well as the information entered into the database of the site.In the latter case, the possible options: to do as it is now will be a plus mark (bracketed year / parentheses Author + year) or make one general field, and then the program will disassemble the author, year and brackets separately. In the first case it is easier to avoid mistakes and it understandable for someone who first enters the Old.The second case is good if you are going to enter a lot of data-trees (that you are comfortable with the copy of the author Year and staples from some other source). Therefore, I can understand, if you stand up for the second option on the reasons I have voiced.If other reasons, and the first is not an option - please voice, for me it is important to understand what is the point.

21.01.2011 15:23, Alexandr Zhakov:

It was a quote, I do not agree with it.
Petr Khramov, 20.01.2011 0:06
. Keep out of the year, along with a text by the author - it's wrong.

21.01.2011 15:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yevgeny Komarov, 14-01-2011 17:55
I fully support - split into two Strait is not just senseless and harmful!
Alexander Zhakov, 0:14 20.01.2011

Keep out of the year, along with a text by the author - it's wrong.

21.01.2011 15:07, Peter Khramov:

Geo-Tagging - another story, how (if) the card will be ready for putting points there is a separate conversation goes on bindings. But, on the other hand, if the form can not be determined - how important the point?

21.01.2011 15:05, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, 3 people said they need braces. And braces are. And at the exit (on Un descriptions) they will look unified. What is really more?

21.01.2011 14:57, Peter Khramov:

ZY As the names of species have recovered the photos indicated NoName.

21.01.2011 14:56, Peter Khramov:

So those photos that can be recovered, restored. This has remained the author and the files themselves, but there is no data on types, etc. Because I ask authors whose photos restored upon to pay substantial infu required by section uploaded images in the Personal Area.It is important for Dmitry Pozhogin, Basil Feoktistov and Evgeny Komarov. At the same time, please check whether all recovered photos ...

21.01.2011 14:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If a species can not be determined, no photos, but there is a peg to the place, it is not necessary to remove. The main binding order- the place !!! Any photographer remembers the place, I do not even doubt it. Let not remember the date, but the place (district, region) - 100%. Urban prerequisite.

21.01.2011 14:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Still in its make. Although 3 people said delicious.

21.01.2011 14:24, Peter Khramov:

From early morning January 20 site could initially be generally available later fully available in the second half of January 20 - work interruptions and other braking. Now all ustakanilos and hosting provider vowed last three-cornered hat, now everything will be OK.At the same time, comments and many of the photos have been added to the period of unstable operation of the site, as well as directly in front of him, irretrievably lost. Those photos that may be recovered, I will raise up to 15.00 January 21 (in Moscow). Comments recovery can not be at all.So please duplicate them, and restart photos that do not appear in your personal account after three hours of the day. I am sorry for the inconvenience.

21.01.2011 14:14, Peter Khramov:

In general, as found in the comments yesterday, which seems no longer to recover - if the type can not be determined, but foty decent - they can leave, and if they do not determine the form and photos of themselves no - then removal.

21.01.2011 14:13, Peter Khramov:

Messrs, here the dispute purely theoretically. I will do so, so that you can boot denote brackets, but it will all be stored in different fields, and all will be the norm.

21.01.2011 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

21.01.2011 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Now everything is OK, but on the safe check with host, if all damage behind. How to get confirmation - accomplish your goal, and then we can safely ship the Old ...

21.01.2011 7:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A ping is normal, even strange.

21.01.2011 7:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Wait! TB periodically so slow today.

21.01.2011 6:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, apparently. Status is now yesterday morning (I look). Oh wait it is necessary to downloading anything for a while.

21.01.2011 6:19, Evgeny Komarov:

I understand that as messages and photos uploaded to the 20th day, in the evening, gone? Or how?

20.01.2011 2:27, Alexandr Zhakov:

Cifuna locuples, Walker,1855.

20.01.2011 1:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Peter year here, no release date and priority. Its main functionality is, we need to establish, priority name, if one and the same species was described by various authors. But it goes beyond the functions of the site. The drafters of the audit work with primary sources.

20.01.2011 0:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter delicious field. Nobody on the year, and the author will not search. Perverts go to other sites.

20.01.2011 0:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

I agree with Dmitry.

20.01.2011 0:39, Alexandr Zhakov:

I tried to make a fool of data when downloading the program name before opening bracket of the village put a comma and in the year after the year bracket. It worked. Just do not need to put a comma, then the two of them appear after the names. Peter, I see a site in front of the scientific gains. All right, people's website, for a wide range of users.but in the pages of Piste small letters. tolzhno be the correct name, according to the rules of nomenclature.

20.01.2011 0:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And what is the meaning of these images, if the view can not be determined, and the time and place of fishing do not know ??? No information shall not be shot. Just a picture

20.01.2011 0:23, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, biological nomenclature nothing said about the proper storage of data - it's just not part of its mission. Ie the question of how to store a year - separately or together by the author, not in any way associated with the biology. At the same time, the fact that the need to do so that it is convenient to operate biologists - is not disputed.I have previously done with brackets, but not at all in the course was. What we just learned ...

20.01.2011 0:16, Peter Khramov:

I agree that there will be superfluous once again draw attention to the importance of the field Location shooting at startup. Now I select it and a couple of key fields against other - quite noticeable. Maybe add the appropriate note in the text. Let it be clear that this information is important. But do not miss the photo to places without data on the site - search.It really is better than nothing, and if her strange appearance, and it shall be kept humble yourself in the gallery, and Prof. sections and will not climb. Another example: let's say we have a pretty good one hundred pictures of butterflies, about which we know for certain is that the form they will not be able to determine ever.I believe that if the pictures are decent, they should still be in the gallery, and do not need to remove them.

20.01.2011 0:14, Alexandr Zhakov:

Keep out of the year, along with a text by the author - it's wrong.
Peter, this is your opinion, biological nomenclature thinks differently. It's a conversation about how to write the name in Latin or Russian. For me personally, technically, it's a very daunting task in a simple program, I would have walked variants. a website is down. This you will have to decide.that the sheep were intact, and the wolves are fed.

20.01.2011 0:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

If not mistaken, then there should be the date of first citation. BKZ date vrodebto not allowed. If not published, thus not described. we can safely describe under his own name.

20.01.2011 0:06, Peter Khramov:

On funet is full of options. First got an example: Godman & Salvin, [1890] on the page http://www.nic.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/papilionidae/papilioninae/protographium/index.html Or is there something else was meant? With regards to who should sort the year - it does not matter who it is necessary or not. Keep out of the year, along with a text by the author - it's wrong.A bracket can solve a problem in a different way, you only need to decide with all possible options. ZY And again, a lot of useful information you provide the brackets? Compared to option if always sculpt without braces at all. The blessing is done so often (judging by pop music, by itself).

19.01.2011 23:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

but found no date at all. only the author.

19.01.2011 23:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

This option is unlikely to have. This applies to very old works of 18-19 centuries, generations are now changed so that all of the old types in later births.

19.01.2011 23:44, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

theoretically, yes. but could not find.

19.01.2011 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Before [1919] by essno ...

19.01.2011 23:35, Peter Khramov:

Do I understand that is also possible LastName firstname [1919], when the species was described in this way, but the year is also known only from indirect data?

19.01.2011 23:32, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

19.01.2011 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.01.2011 22:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Approve: let's move.

19.01.2011 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yes, that's it.

19.01.2011 22:45, Peter Khramov:

Yeah. In my Tudu list this thing fixed.

19.01.2011 22:44, Peter Khramov:

Features - in the sense of bugs? Or still features?)) In general, the problems of the future I have a constantly updated list of what to do yet, so feel free to dig - if not done immediately, then certainly on the list accurately listed if offers good will. With regards to exactly loaded prevyuh - there before and had a preview (the last one hundred), but it turns out the cut functionality. That there was uncircumcised, then it is necessary to transfer the sample gallery, so you can choose the number of photons on the page, etc.And if you endure gallery - why not make a transfer instead of just a link to it? Therefore do not bite ...

19.01.2011 22:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

If it can be Abraxas (Calospilos) sylvata (Scopoli, 1763)?

19.01.2011 22:20, Evgeny Komarov:

http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3193/ - here's an example: a competent and qualified entomologist puts a picture collector's item without georeferencing. Maybe it's been a long time - when a field indicating the location of the shooting / collecting was not.But it should not be !!!
Peter! Point of view "better to have something than nothing " here is not the place! It could play a role in the initial stage, but not now. The resource will be more professional - the greater will be wanting to fill it. Photo after each season fall down here by the hundreds. It's time to tighten the requirements.

19.01.2011 22:18, Boris Loboda:

I understood, though there is accustomed to see thumbnails, as usual do ...
I certainly understand that the work of the sea and you can dig up a lot of things yet.And all these features you commit somewhere? Maybe you should start a tracker? The site is in the stage of formation and similar details will be thousands more, I once even afraid to dig deep, because for sure it all sink in the mass of the more important tasks ... :)

19.01.2011 22:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"19.01.2011 " How to be done on the site (more than usual).

19.01.2011 21:59, Peter Khramov:

Essno is now necessary. But in the future it is necessary to change, to perceive a standard option for Russia.

19.01.2011 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

19.01.2011 21:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.01.2011 21:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nevertheless, it should be used, otherwise the date of crooked lie (to themselves satisfied).

19.01.2011 21:56, Peter Khramov:

My laziness. It should be a calendar all the same pile, or to make a standard format or even separate windows repaired. But as long as hands are not reached.

19.01.2011 21:55, Peter Khramov:

Boris, this section displays unpublished prevyuhi ph. In published there is a link to a gallery. Ie in your case, there should be one, plus a link to prevyuha 3 pictures in the gallery.

19.01.2011 21:52, Boris Loboda:

YYYY-MM-DD HH-MM-SS
And what caused this strange format? In php can be any kind of reading?

19.01.2011 21:51, Peter Khramov:

For that thanks to Hope Flegontova, Natalia Demchenko Vasily Feoktistov, Viktor Titov, Andrey Sazykin, Andrey Ponomarev, Dmitry Pozhogin, Sergei Novitsky, Andrew buttercup, Yevgeny Komarov, Alexander Zhakov, Eugene Davkaevu, Nikolai Vladimirov Evgeny and Bezgrebelnomu.Relevant updates on the pages of forms will be carried out over the next couple of hours.

19.01.2011 21:46, Boris Loboda:

I see "Downloaded images " delayed only one photo, I understand there has to be all about? Or so conceived?

19.01.2011 21:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

Orthotaenia undulana (Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775).

19.01.2011 21:08, Alexandr Zhakov:

The simplest examples:
Papilio machaon Linnaeus, 1758 - view of the kind described in 1758;
Iphiclides podalirius (Linnaeus 1758) - the form is described in another way, in 1758;
Zegris eupheme (Esper, [1805]) - the kind described in a different way, based on indirect evidence in 1805, the exact date of the publication of descriptions are not known.
What is the description of the search by date, it is the last thing that is recognized in the literature.The publications always indicate the name, most of the abbreviated name of the author, rarely full name of the author, and then already - the date of the description and do not always ..

19.01.2011 20:56, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! Who's supposed to sort kinds of description of the year? If there is someone "angled " on such statistics, it is too bold for the sake of one or two a problem.So it is for the author - that's a very special thing, again, units will require, but the observance of the nomenclature of accuracy - it should be a priority! That kind of sort (to sample) in the region - this is really necessary. And here is unification of geographical indications. And we have not even mandatory to anchor the photo can not come ...In one box to the author and year of description. Dmitry rights.

19.01.2011 20:22, Peter Khramov:

Since merge fields with the year and the author - very wrong (and how to sort kinds of description, the time or the author?) I write all options ready examples - as it can be and that may mean. Without examples - did not happen.

19.01.2011 19:27, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, don't worry, won't get lost.

19.01.2011 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shot dates of some of my latest uploaded photos should be updated to the right ones (wrong or no date at all). Not to miss them.

19.01.2011 17:39, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 17:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 16:41, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 16:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When was shot: 23/6/1996.

19.01.2011 16:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shot date: 23/08/2009.

19.01.2011 16:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shot date: 05/08/2009.

19.01.2011 16:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shot date: 05/08/2009.

19.01.2011 16:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

When was shot: 20/06/2010.

19.01.2011 16:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Shot date (wrongly signed) should be changed to 31/12/2009 (raised butterfly).

19.01.2011 15:06, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to Thera obeliscata.

19.01.2011 14:59, Vlad Proklov:

Th. obeliscata for sure.

19.01.2011 14:43, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, further emphasize the importance of the field "place " Indeed, it is possible (without making it mandatory in this case). But I immediately picked up the data - from the last 1,000 photos, only 37 do not have a signature on the spot. Another thing is that many of these early photographs of signatures not, becausethere was no suitable field in the form of either foty loaded at all out of shape (and when the form itself was not). But it is now possible to fix only the second appeal to the authors ...

19.01.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Corrected.

19.01.2011 14:38, Peter Khramov:

Weird indeed. Corrected.

19.01.2011 14:05, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! It's hard to imagine anyone upload photos of butterflies, made by himself and does not know in this case, where it is done! Already before the field a man must have to remember :) Let there be an accurate indication, but the knowledge that the photo is made in Moscow or in the Far East, dramatically simplifies the identification of the species is difficult to be recognized by the photo!Well, in the entomology sverhredky instance even without labels simply do not "is " nothing. I do not see a problem in that it is strongly (eg typed in red font) wishes, which is placed on the page for uploading photos.After all admit that many do not write this information to the photo just by misunderstanding of the importance of this information, although it can fill the field.

19.01.2011 13:17, Natalia Demchenko:

..and this one is too....

19.01.2011 13:16, Natalia Demchenko:

... didn't get out here...

19.01.2011 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

19.01.2011 13:00, Peter Khramov:

For photos, uploaded to the site, two requirements: to match the theme of the resource and to the author of the picture was a user who downloads the picture.Yes, it will be very good if the photo will be set out to answer my wishes, if it is not much like the previously laid out and if it is accompanied by detailed information on the time and location of recording.But I am opposed to making the requirement specification of the data required - for picture without specifying the place and / or time, other things being equal is better than no pictures at all. A Plantarium - yes, a good site, I agree . Against the background of many other resources such directions and at all posh.

19.01.2011 11:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Clepsis pallidana, Fabricius, 1776.

19.01.2011 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Keep Eugene at 100%

19.01.2011 9:07, Evgeny Komarov:

Another wish that, in my opinion, it is necessary to make mandatory for everyone who puts images: it is indicated the location of recording / charges, as usual, for example, in the Plantarium. Website similar and may serve as a model to emulate in many ways.This requirement is not always feasible for the exotic, filmed in the collections, but filmed in Russia should make mandatory. Immediately withdraw many of the problems in determining / clarifying! And the value of the information provided on the site to increase in times!

19.01.2011 8:12, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 8:04, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 8:04, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 7:51, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Rather Thera obeliscata (angles of medial ribbons are smoother and softer, the apical spot is way clearer, color is sooner yellow ochre than red one, and so on).

19.01.2011 7:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, no label, but this one is surely from Columbia. Tough guys, say.

19.01.2011 7:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 7:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

19.01.2011 2:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.01.2011 2:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

19.01.2011 2:18, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

19.01.2011 2:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hypsopygia iwamotoi, Kirpichnikova & Yamanaka 1995. Anyway, better to look at genitalia under a microscope.

19.01.2011 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Datanoides fasciatus, Butler, 1878.

19.01.2011 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Datanoides fasciatus, Butler, 1878.

19.01.2011 1:21, Alexandr Zhakov:

Datanoides fasciatus, Butler, 1878.

19.01.2011 0:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Just those photos for a long time hanging (the very first throw). Some have already been published on the website of that series, so I thought that the others do not need

19.01.2011 0:18, Evgeny Komarov:

That's right! New Guinea should be kept, Papua removed. Wrote down just on autopilot. Also true for other Ornithoptera of the Arfak Mountains such as Ornithoptera rotschildi, arfakensis, goliath.

19.01.2011 0:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes. This is Indonesian New Guinea.

19.01.2011 0:04, Peter Khramov:

So mountains are true and Papua not?

18.01.2011 23:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

That's just a blunder. The Arfak Mountains are not in Papua New Guinea but Indonesian New Guinea. West Irian Jaya.

18.01.2011 23:43, Peter Khramov:

Her. None of those who were loaded up to the moment when the glitch was to undergo treatment (see. Said Vasily link). In general, everything is OK.

18.01.2011 23:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No label?? Subspecies needed. This triple lives in Columbia, though this one is definitely not colombus. So, can be acritus or serville. I've got photo of nominative.

18.01.2011 23:28, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

18.01.2011 23:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Just some have, some do not - I think that without unnecessary prevyuh.

18.01.2011 23:05, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, removed in any case it is not necessary, I already treat ...

18.01.2011 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I'm so bothered with this photo already for a long time. Can suggest only Thymelicus lineola, Ochsenheimer, 1808, or Thymelicus sylvestris, Poda, 1761 (tough angle).

18.01.2011 21:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It seems that it is not necessary: ​​http://lepidoptera.ru/community/1375/

18.01.2011 21:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If the BOS, in the pictures is expected to publish their prevyushek- no need to remove or ???

18.01.2011 18:52, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen who upload photos to the site. I draw your attention to a couple of points:
1. Please ship the photos that do not have the scope and / or signatures. I remind you that the site passed a single standard signatures, so your pictures are not left unprotected.If there are others in the photo captions or frames - I just cut them, but sometimes suffers composition of the picture may be lost or simply fragments of the image of the object, there is no good.I understand that sometimes it is not possible to provide a snapshot of unprinted / frameworks or do not have time, in such cases, just keep in mind the further trimming of me.
Soon the site starts showing pictures of a larger size than it is now.At the same time, many of the pictures before publication have to cut / sprinkle (the reduced size). In this regard, please upload new photos ranging from 1024 on the larger side. Possible. Less - it is also possible.The last true if you do not want to publish the pictures in a large amount, and if you just are not able to send> = 1024.
Again, it does not demand, and wishes for a more comfortable working and the publication of pictures.

18.01.2011 13:21, Peter Khramov:

Goes from "undetermined" to Eupithecia centaureata.

18.01.2011 12:36, Peter Khramov:

It's not the engine of forum. As I understand it, Eugene proposes to increase the number of sections, and I'm not against it, but you need to understand exactly what areas really need (and are not empty). There is a suspicion that now people do not often choose any section other than the main ...

18.01.2011 12:08, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Eupithecia centaureata.

18.01.2011 11:54, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.01.2011 11:48, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.01.2011 11:48, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.01.2011 11:40, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

18.01.2011 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, yes it is better to do so as it is! And IPB (of forum engine) or something like that here is not to cling, and who it will be moderate? Site is enough. Of course this is my subjective opinion.

17.01.2011 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Comments to the proposed version of Eugene: The first section could go just present Blog / (where topics are few and, in general, on this topic). The second - probably, such discussions can be carried out in the pages devoted to specific species and taxa above species level.Why not? Evaluation of the photo as a taxonomic or any other - in the pages of most of these photos. A Home Communities, as now, all the assembly of comments on this site.
What do you think?

17.01.2011 23:28, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter, Basil! I agree that the "when everything will fall into place, " it is necessary to "removes extra ", but that discussion of the status of a particular photo / species. here is simple. And with the forum it is not so simple.
Peter! Is it possible to make the structure of infinitesimal Forum the standard for the majority of sites? Ieyou come to the forum / community and see a branch with fresh reports or their absence?
A proposal by the main forum for discussion can offer are:
1. Issues of work and structure of the site.
2. Questions taxonomy of butterflies and improve the structure of the database and directory.
3. Identification of species in the photo on this site.The first section will be specific to the work site. Ie its structure, the necessary information on the pages, access members, perhaps - the diversification of levels of access for participants, and so on. like. It must be all that concerns the development of the resource.
The second - the debate like the one that arose because of Troides, includinguseful links to taxonomic resources, ideas, etc.
Third - displays information on the taxonomic assessment laid out photos.
This is a first approximation. Accordingly, in at least the first two, has created some branches.
Well, something like that would be desirable. Heads there are many - let's think together as far as possible.

17.01.2011 22:47, Natalia Demchenko:

dysstroma_citrata.

17.01.2011 22:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In some cases, controversy is inevitable. For example the debate over generic / specific accessory butterfly. I suggest that everything in its place with this butterfly will rise simply to remove excess. It really is not a forum. Example: Ornitoptera priamus.

17.01.2011 22:41, Natalia Demchenko:

Hydria cervinalis.

17.01.2011 22:31, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, I honestly do not see how the structure of the section to develop a community, to make it easier (and more precisely - do not see the best samples of new sections, which would not be threatened with the fate of empty or half-empty left). The only opportunity to comment on plans supraspecific taxa, articles and authors.This should help to reduce and offtopic, but not drastically. If someone has ideas which sections still need - let's really talk about it. If necessary, I will implement the technical part.

17.01.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Tatyana, Vlad, thanks. Moved to X. ferrugata, "identified successfully".

17.01.2011 22:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

17.01.2011 22:24, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

17.01.2011 22:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 22:16, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 21:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is male.

17.01.2011 21:22, Peter Khramov:

Publish the next batch of photos. Photos provided 11 of our authors - Tatyana Gordeeva Natalia Demchenko, Hope Flegontova, Eugene Davkaev Alexander Zhakov, Elvir Izmailov, Yevgeny Komarov, Andrey Lyutikov Dmitry Pozhogin, Andrey Sazykin and Vasiliy Feoktistov.Thank you! The total number of photons in the gallery exceeded 3000, which is also nice.

17.01.2011 19:31, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues We are with you in the comments to the descriptions engaged offtopic! Let's somehow structured forum. That is hot to: discussion of division of the tribe Troidini (Sem. Papilionidae) have smeared in the comments of several kinds.This is not the case and is not the place! It must be specifically in the forum to do thematic threads there to discuss these issues, and in the comments to discuss the status Trogonoptera Ornithoptera paradisea arphakensis! Peter! What about the possibility to organize it? Let us then discuss the structure of the forum.

17.01.2011 19:12, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 19:12, Vlad Proklov:

Approve Tatyana's suggestion.

17.01.2011 17:57, Peter Khramov:

Advertising we assume, of course, will not. But when the source is cited - it is really a harmless action than clones of sites entirely. And besides http://dviger.com/gallery/work/c_8620.html there are heaps of these ...

17.01.2011 17:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 17:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 16:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Link and I was not looking (just once familiar image rushed into the eyes).
A resolution: Yandex because it does not ask anybody.
We assume this advertising site.

17.01.2011 16:48, Andrey Sazykin:

There is a link there to a source, and the text in the photo is not jammed. Another thing permit, as far as I know, no one asked?

17.01.2011 16:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I go now on an Internet and came across: http://dviger.com/gallery/work/c_8620.html
Pay attention to the images and your photos certainly learn.
Of course this is not a complete clone. I wonder how many more of such will.

17.01.2011 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Comment moved to photo, photo did to Drasteria picta.

17.01.2011 14:55, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

17.01.2011 14:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 14:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 14:39, Peter Khramov:

Comments moved to the species description page.

17.01.2011 14:26, Peter Khramov:

Still "uncertain".

17.01.2011 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

17.01.2011 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

17.01.2011 14:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain" then.

17.01.2011 13:31, Peter Khramov:

Now I try again in Opera - everything is OK. Perhaps you should configure the time you store cookies, or they do from time to time clean. I do not see what else you can think of.

17.01.2011 13:24, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

17.01.2011 12:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 12:58, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 12:57, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 12:55, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 12:52, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:06, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 11:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 9:59, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Looks more similar to Xanthorhoe ferrugata.

17.01.2011 9:57, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Xanthorhoe ferrugata.

17.01.2011 9:56, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Xanthorhoe spadicearia.

17.01.2011 9:47, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Can be Lomographa temerata.

17.01.2011 9:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ornithoptera priamus urvillianus subspecies (Guérin-Menéville, 1838).

17.01.2011 9:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 9:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 9:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

17.01.2011 8:16, Evgeny Komarov:

My Opera is similar - only after attempts to vote a second / tertiary :)

17.01.2011 8:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

17.01.2011 8:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

17.01.2011 8:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Female.

17.01.2011 8:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

17.01.2011 7:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter and skills they are not visible (with a browser is always: Opera). See, you can only try to vote again.

17.01.2011 6:58, Evgeny Komarov:

Camptogramma bilineata (Linnaeus 1758).

16.01.2011 23:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hard to identify exactly without underside. Anyway, seems to be ligea.

16.01.2011 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Terrific.

16.01.2011 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Alexander, as Voting is not only among the registered users, and check voted / No is not on the user. Instead, the results form can be shown, for example, if you open the site with a different browser.

16.01.2011 22:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 22:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No hope without underside. Certain female.

16.01.2011 22:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.01.2011 22:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.01.2011 21:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Subspecies, please. Thoas obliges.

16.01.2011 16:45, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Can be Teia antiquoides (Hübner, [1822]). Bright black stripes, saffron-colored. And a food plant is bilobate bushes, not monocotyledonous on what Laelia feeds.

16.01.2011 16:17, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Euproctis similis for sure!

16.01.2011 16:17, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Euproctis similis without a doubt!

16.01.2011 16:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:12, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:11, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Gone are the results of the vote, though I walk under your name.

16.01.2011 16:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 16:01, Peter Khramov:

Rhode Neographium removed from the system, marcellus ordered to Eurytides with prostanovkoy as a synonym Neographium marcellus.

16.01.2011 15:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's what I think the same.

16.01.2011 15:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

In my opinion Eurytides (Neographium) marcellus

16.01.2011 15:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Today we know 45 species and 12 species Eurytides Neographium. Neographium kind described Möhn, 2002; Die Schmetterlinge der Erde, 14: 2, TS although often written as a subgenus.

16.01.2011 15:50, Peter Khramov:

Do I understand that Neographium marcellus can safely be described as Eurytides marcellus?

16.01.2011 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Of course. There are so designated - time shooting / fishing - that is, recording instances of the field, and fishing for dried, captured later.

16.01.2011 15:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

So these two kinds like everywhere Eurytides were. When they began Neographium?

16.01.2011 15:38, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Peter! Offer Neographium born to unite with the family Eurytides yet. Piled everything in Neographium not clear on what basis, and synonyms when making a new type of point race Neographium.

16.01.2011 15:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whew, I corrected: the date format here is really of great importance. And for collection specimens. shooting time does not matter, important data capture (label) I have it for such and checked.

16.01.2011 15:29, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:27, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:25, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:19, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:16, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:13, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:08, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:07, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:05, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:04, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:04, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:01, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:00, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 15:00, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

16.01.2011 14:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK, Peter. It is clear right now corrected. The main thing is probably always the same template and all adhere to. A calendar I do not think it is necessary (this is my opinion).

16.01.2011 14:42, Peter Khramov:

Messrs template date / time is now as follows: YYYY-MM-DD HH-MM-SS. Ie date in reverse order (but not both wrote Basil! - is in the middle of the month). The system a little unusual, but I think that this is 0000-00-00 will understand how to enter the Old. However, I agree that this may be not very comfortable, try to convert it to the field was more human.Maybe some kalendat zababahat ...

16.01.2011 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Any suggestions more?

16.01.2011 14:34, Peter Khramov:

Alexandr, thanks for identifying. Photo moved.

16.01.2011 14:32, Peter Khramov:

Continue talking of subspecies: now one can get subspecies info only at species description pages, reading descriptions or comments (as Dmitry and Alexandr have been adding such comments). But one can't tell looking at the image if there is any subspecies info or not (if subspecies was specified at all). I think, that now there is no need in individual subspecies pages. Nevertheless, we should get them more systematized. So, maybe there should be some special fields to add subspecies and forms info of every species. In this case one can see subspecies list and adjacent images at the species page. Search will also include subspecies and forms. Please, give opinion if interested in topic.

16.01.2011 14:25, Peter Khramov:

Last Dmitry Podjogin comment moved to the species description page.

16.01.2011 14:24, Peter Khramov:

Caucasus removed.

16.01.2011 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

16.01.2011 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, thanks, updated.

16.01.2011 14:21, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, this is the same: maybe I have a photo with its underside, but of another butterfly. Will specify later.

16.01.2011 14:15, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to activated species. Anyway, that's pretty weird why some species with info given are not activated...

16.01.2011 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Moved to M. dryas.

16.01.2011 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

16.01.2011 14:04, Peter Khramov:

As for the internet - that's not the provider, but some circumstances zatstavlyayut to wander from place to place, including long distance. Somewhere in the chain there, somewhere in there, somewhere in there, but not very good quality.

16.01.2011 13:43, Alexandr Zhakov:

The date and time to insert only numbers, dividers inserts program

16.01.2011 13:39, Natalia Demchenko:

This turned out to be Lygephila viciae.

16.01.2011 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It seems undestanding: hammered earlier date as I used to write. For example: 18.06.1998 (and through the point), but should something 1998-18-06 (a dash). Probably why such a thing.

16.01.2011 13:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Now normally laid down (with the underside Zorka, a collector paste).

16.01.2011 12:37, Alexandr Zhakov:

Everything is working. Only time will not retract, but I think it is inserted into the program.

16.01.2011 12:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In principle, it is not really important if the picture "in the " done and EXIFu learn everything you can. And if a butterfly collection, and date from the label is driven, it is important. Although HZ: Maybe because I have one?

16.01.2011 12:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

In principle, it is not really important if the picture "in the " done and EXIFu learn everything you can. And if a butterfly collection, and date from the label is driven, it is important. Although HZ: Maybe because I have one?

16.01.2011 12:23, Evgeny Komarov:

I have no problems and everything is edited.

16.01.2011 11:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

To all: please check your date of shooting / fishing. I went to them crooked and some are not edited. I duplicated where extra. Info. Peter, these dates should be considered when publishing.

15.01.2011 23:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ok then, don't worry. Just wanted to verify than once more.

15.01.2011 18:25, Andrey Sazykin:

Removing works! Webmaster thank you very much :)

15.01.2011 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I do not know Peter, but I just have no one to change. It started with the whole stuff that my local dip Net by Net bought. A normal is no longer in the city (the best was purchased).

15.01.2011 17:57, Evgeny Komarov:

Peter! And what kind of problems with an Internet? If I worked so, I would have been a thousand times change ISPs. There are glitches, but it's rare booolshaya!

15.01.2011 17:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

And I shnyaga also went with an Internet wanted to correct the date (crooked formed). And the doomsday started. Morning wait.

15.01.2011 17:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Everything is working! Thank you!

15.01.2011 17:52, Evgeny Komarov:

Aha! Now I try and take away!

15.01.2011 16:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you, now try is the 'Net, and I have a normal, probably globally is (as I have sinned MFN).

15.01.2011 15:54, Andrey Sazykin:

Yeah thanks! I take advantage of today.

15.01.2011 15:49, Peter Khramov:

So, the first example of a suitable system is ready. Go to the downloaded images, each author can edit all the information about those photos that are loaded but not yet published, and delete them if necessary.In the Title box, type each photo has a system avtopodstanovok species names (like the one that is available on the download page of new photos).
System data editing on a photo can help not only when you have something mixed up when loading or learn something new after it, but when there is a desire to upload a lot of photos at once, even more so - similar in content (can be first all the load, and then enter the data for each of them).
ZYDownload photo archives is not ready yet, but soon will be.
Zzy With the internet and not just with an Internet continuing troubles, hopefully, next time get to network at least tonight or tomorrow afternoon, if I can respond to comments and so forth. Now only publish phot editing system.

15.01.2011 15:45, Peter Khramov:

As far as I can remember, this was shot in some museum abroad where it was put in a glass box. So no underside and maybe label too. I will check it later, look through original pics, maybe find something more eloquent.

15.01.2011 13:22, Evgeny Komarov:

Look there, its absolute copy of http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3797/! Local south dryas has somewhat different underside, that's why I didn't realize it first.

15.01.2011 11:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Approve, looks way more similar to Minois dryas. The white center of its "eye" confuses, so I ignored dryas at once and failed.

15.01.2011 11:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also let's apply it to the genus.

15.01.2011 10:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Need to look at underside??? Cause you can tell the difference only by red lunules on the hind wing underside.

15.01.2011 10:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Female.

15.01.2011 10:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

15.01.2011 9:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, that should be removed (label definitely sucks). Change to: caught location unknown.

15.01.2011 9:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Please, remove Caucasus.

15.01.2011 8:36, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry, thumbs up. This one is 99% sure dryas!

15.01.2011 3:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Not keen at all on identifying of nature photos but can suggest Minois dryas (Scopoli, 1763). Nominative if Ural.

15.01.2011 2:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Petr, if it's possible to look at underside or label, maybe?

15.01.2011 2:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I've got ssp. ducenarius.

15.01.2011 0:09, Alexandr Zhakov:

Family Choreutidae, species Anthophila fabriciana (Linnaeus 1767).

14.01.2011 23:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

14.01.2011 21:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Natalia, you are absolutely right, this one is Eulithis prunata. Just has been identified by Sungaya at molbiol.ru

14.01.2011 20:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Evgeny, obviously subspecies is used till species nominative added. Right after that everything should get clear. At least one for sure should have it.

14.01.2011 20:08, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry, I remind you, just spices are not and just because a site is not a one off. But you think it is spices, so th and Wellcome, and all that. Right now I'm writing from the phone as an Internet will accomplish your goal more.

14.01.2011 19:35, Natalia Demchenko:

Seems not to be this...

14.01.2011 19:35, Natalia Demchenko:

Eulithis prunata ??

14.01.2011 19:34, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry Pozhogin, 14.01.2011 18:40 - Dmitry! A lot of people with a "biological entity " cool inferior not a biologist, but enthusiastic SERIOUSLY "layman ". Examples of this are countless! Including do not cry the blues :) I am a professional entomologist, but with some very familiar butterflies and a lot of entomologists do not teach me! And that's OK!

14.01.2011 18:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I do not even biological education. I'm not special. Then identify and hang the photo with certain types have no right.
You'll have to pull all the same, that is not real. It turns out the project is doomed ???

14.01.2011 18:35, Evgeny Komarov:

Petr! There is no any additional subspecies info since no special form yet to put one. So as I can't see it at the very photo, I should every time click the image to go to the detailed info page. I tried to add it somehow uploading my last photos, but in the end can't see that at the photo page!

14.01.2011 18:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Without parentheses, all in parentheses + a year in square brackets is another option. Simply will integrate the above mentioned fields.

14.01.2011 18:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

The main thing is that with all of this to the content of the (same accuracy in determining, for example, or adequacy of the species) had a ratio of people actually in the subject, not passers-by.
And how do you define the topic people or not, but about the adequacy of the kinds of pro and you will not say anything. How many professors, so many opinions.Simply take something for the basis (the same site as the most affordable Saveliev) and this dance.

14.01.2011 18:17, Peter Khramov:

Dmitry correctly I understand that options (other than standard) can be taken into account following - the year in brackets, the author in parentheses brief specific name in parentheses. Or something else?

14.01.2011 18:16, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, on the section of similar species - Now is not entirely clear how this thing to realize, admit to anyone from editing, etc. - Because, perhaps, it is still not. Open-ended question in general. All sorts of opinions, again, welcome. With regards, for whom life - I believe (though a lot of people managed to disagree), it is possible to connect to a single resource of random people who are just interested in what they have clicked at his dacha, people passionate topic, but little versed in it, beginners or just have some cognitive interest,as well as different levels of amateur and professional. The main thing is that with all of this to the content of the (same accuracy in determining, for example, or adequacy of the species) had a ratio of people actually in the subject, not passers-by. Then the quality of the information will be on top.And if the site will help someone move from a group of illiterates in a literate - and then all will be well. Summary: to the resource was useful for specialists, it is necessary not that it was not dummies, but the fact that there were experts who have third-party data is filtered, and did not disdain to add their own.Again, if some function overload the page, I made them customizable. Ps. In all this wonderful picture is superimposed by the fact that I myself am not a butterfly specialist, even though there are all sorts of education and other husks.

14.01.2011 18:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If the author's name is in parentheses, it means that the author believed that this species belongs to a different genus.

14.01.2011 17:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and in this sense. He gave his wife turned apollo- scoop.

14.01.2011 17:55, Evgeny Komarov:

Dmitry Pozhogin, 14.01.2011 16:58 - I fully support - split into two Strait is not just senseless and harmful!

Petr Khramov, 16:16 14.01.2011 - "Ideally, in the future we plan to profile similar species (externally), to a person once seen, is there any similar options, and, accordingly, whether he could make a mistake, such as the definition.But to create such a partition requires a lot of data, most likely - a form for users so they can bring their opinions on the subject, etc. ... "
- Peter! Such things are realized, experts taxonomists in the group (for example - CD determinant "Butterflies of Eastern Europe ... " Ivy and Morgunov and companies).Just like it is the user will golubyaki Icarus and Argus, well, it is quite relevant to different groups. Hence the question - complete resource for amateurs created (in which all the shovels Butterfly :)), or still is assumed to be the professional level? It is better defined once, and then later not raking that is formed!

14.01.2011 17:55, Peter Khramov:

About parentheses - the question: is it possible to list the maximum number of different options, where some braces can be located and what it means (here the same remark about the specific name in brackets).

14.01.2011 17:54, Peter Khramov:

About his wife - I did not quite understand. If it means that the kettle would not determine how it helps - so it is so, but why not make more convenient for poluchaynikov starting nechaynikov and other developing? .. If the meaning was in the other - please explain. ..

14.01.2011 17:50, Peter Khramov:

As for classifying, yes, there is to be, subspecies will be classified somehow. Now we've got lack of its info and sometimes also of photos. For instance, this very nephelus is depicted there only once (ok, there is one more photo to publish). More info = better and properer subspecies classifying. Any ideas? Let's have a brainstorm, but please, in another topic.

14.01.2011 17:42, Peter Khramov:

Back to "identified successfully".

14.01.2011 17:37, Peter Khramov:

The gallery Fixed an issue where not all authors are displayed in the photo list. On each page of the poster images are now shown the most popular of his photographs.

14.01.2011 17:19, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Hey, what about subspecies classifying??? Look at nephelus guys, they are sooo different. Confusing.

14.01.2011 17:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Got it at my personal webpage.

14.01.2011 17:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

According to Tuzov and Co, that is Amur and Ussuri regions; central and NE. China, Korea.

14.01.2011 17:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Also add its underside, please. This crew is not easy one, so everyone should see that.

14.01.2011 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Same here, however sometimes I've just got such "naked" ones :)

14.01.2011 17:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sorry for pickiness, but for me personally labels are the most important things to believe in.

14.01.2011 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, Russian Far East, apparently?

14.01.2011 17:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, Limenitis amphyssa, label is wrong.

14.01.2011 17:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, got its underside (see mail).

14.01.2011 16:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And please, when you create a new type of pages you need to unite the field and author of the year, otherwise the brackets round, square or without skobok- not understand

14.01.2011 16:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

And "nephelus" should be parenthesized.

14.01.2011 16:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Put my wife, give her any butterfly and make determined. My wife has all the scoops.

14.01.2011 16:45, Peter Khramov:

Subspecies had been already removed. Signed "male".

14.01.2011 16:43, Peter Khramov:

Meh, my vote plus.

14.01.2011 16:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Can't specify its subspecies having no label. Better remove subspecies and sign "male".

14.01.2011 16:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Think, better to leave that as nephelus subspecies.

14.01.2011 16:30, Peter Khramov:

Cool photo even though not ideal from a technical point of view.

14.01.2011 16:21, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it will be gradually introduced new capabilities for editing users / authors. The same addition of new genera and species - is a step towards this. If you have any specific ideas, which still is not enough - let's discuss, and I'm on the results of the discussion will be implemented. With regard to the structure of the forum - pay attention that you can not view all the comments, but only news / blog, and there just Inquiry quite clearly visible. Another thing is that I recently slightly drowned in the comments to the photos and type, so missed the specified topic.And people probably too lazy to sort by section, and in most cases looks only basic (but it is not the structure).Also soon add a section, which will only show comments and topics relating to you as a registered user - for example, comments on the uploaded photos or the photos that you are commenting on. It should also help more comfortable monitoring posts in the Community.

14.01.2011 16:16, Peter Khramov:

Eugene was my idea, so explain: there are 2 things - 1) Ideally, in the future we plan to profile similar species (externally), to a person once seen, is there any similar options, and, accordingly, whether he could be wrong For example, in the determination.But to create such a partition requires a lot of data, most likely - a form for users so they can bring their opinions on the subject, etc. Ie it will be realized if, in the future. Section types with the same colors partially performs this function - of course, the similarity is limited to the color.2) I believe the color information is interesting and function definitions, and it is interesting to see that there is a set of colors similar to this species. I admit that it may not be interesting to anyone else but me. Because - yes, the question for discussion, asking all stakeholders to express their views. Ps.Eugene, solyanka might seem overly team yet because the last few days for the species, a set of colors that did not put down, as the same set of demonstrated other species in which the set is also not entered. Now it is fixed, and this section is activated only for species that have as a set of something specified. W.ZY About Traffic - depending on the number of similar color, the traffic to the page can go twice as many than those without this section. Z.Z.Z.Y. By the way, one of the options - make a section customizable. Ie By default, it is displayed and the user, which is not suitable, it may affix the appropriate setting, such as in the Personal Area.In fact, many plans dopolno display settings for registered users, it can be also a ...

14.01.2011 15:51, Evgeny Komarov:

In principle, given that the site is moderated by one man and his powers and possibilities are not unlimited, it is advisable to give authors more possibilities (what, how and in what borders - negotiable Communities). But anarchy is not allowed here, too, of course. And that is formed ...
Well, you need to structure the forum.There are lost messages in the mass turnover (this is not the topic, but it arises). Needed is a separate section on the work and structure of the site! I've written a couple of days ago about excessive fichah page type ... Apparently, "lost ".

14.01.2011 15:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Mine from personal account page are also identified all.

14.01.2011 15:46, Peter Khramov:

Yes, folks are so active these days about identifying, so as there are not so many "undetermined" left to identify, even with January extras...

14.01.2011 15:43, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "uncertain".

14.01.2011 15:43, Peter Khramov:

#3000 moved to "uncertain".

14.01.2011 15:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes to ferula, "uncertain".

14.01.2011 15:40, Peter Khramov:

Species added, photo moved.

14.01.2011 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, thanks, and to Dmitry too, once more. What a story, had "undetermined" status more than a year, and turned out such a treasure :)

14.01.2011 15:35, Peter Khramov:

New species and genus added, photo moved. Also, my congrats to having such a gem ;--)

14.01.2011 15:32, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved.

14.01.2011 15:32, Peter Khramov:

New species added, photo moved.

14.01.2011 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Today I will try to do. Yesterday - today with an Internet problems now and then. Perhaps a few more days will be. Therefore, a 100% guarantee can not, but I will take all the measures.

14.01.2011 14:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Maybe we should wait for Dmitry.

14.01.2011 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Subspecies removed. As far as I can guess, Dmitry just compared two subspecies talking about cuspidatus, not commented this photo.

14.01.2011 13:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved to G. nomius.

14.01.2011 13:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good, I'll look it through and upload underside later.

14.01.2011 13:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female now.

14.01.2011 13:07, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain" then, waiting for new opinions.

14.01.2011 13:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved to B. crassus. What's better and more adequate, female or imago?

14.01.2011 13:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male yet.

14.01.2011 13:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved. Male or imago?

14.01.2011 12:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to M. berania.

14.01.2011 12:51, Peter Khramov:

If I specify this as Papilio nephelus chaon, no drama? Cause as I can see, it's named such in nearly every reference. Or that's surely out of date?

14.01.2011 12:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Petr, sure. Please, copy Dmitry full info as it is. I asked him personally to check mine.

14.01.2011 12:45, Peter Khramov:

Sirs, let's sum it up: identifying is successful and subspecies info not, should last be removed then?

14.01.2011 9:04, Evgeny Glebov:

Photos #4017-4020 are of the same butterfly shot from different angles.

14.01.2011 9:03, Evgeny Glebov:

Photos #4017-4020 are of the same butterfly shot from different angles.

14.01.2011 9:02, Evgeny Glebov:

#4017-4020 images are of the same butterfly, shot from different angles.

14.01.2011 8:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Yes, but nowadays it's rather considered to be an individual species, see Wynter-Blyth, M. A., 1982; Butterflies of the Indian Region.

14.01.2011 8:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As Papilio nephelus chaon, Westwood, 1845?

14.01.2011 8:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Bingo finally!!! So easy case. Only Papilio chaon can have such underside! And it is in North India also!

14.01.2011 7:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Uploaded underside. Anyway, thanks!

14.01.2011 7:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Well, "India" sign should be removed then. If this one is Papilio sataspes, it's Sulawesi 99% sure.

14.01.2011 7:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Needed for sure there, on website.

14.01.2011 7:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hm, hard to believe, really hard. Check your mail, sent helenus underside.

14.01.2011 5:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Just for the record, I have a true photo of this subspecies from Mexico. If needed.

14.01.2011 5:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Sataspes is surely bigger than any helenus. I happened to catch last ones of machaon size.

14.01.2011 5:35, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Papilio thoas oviedo, Gundlach, 1866.

14.01.2011 5:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks!

14.01.2011 5:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is Marpesia berania (Hewitson, 1852).

14.01.2011 5:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Once was websearching for that, and thanks for remarks. We'll get them finally :)

14.01.2011 5:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 5:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

How could you manage to identify its subspecies having no label??? And there is no such subspecies, this is synonym to Opsiphanes invirae cuspidatus, Stichel 1904, i. e. Central America.

14.01.2011 5:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wow, even without spurs.

14.01.2011 5:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just for the record: my Indian helenus was shot from its underside, see #3019.

14.01.2011 5:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No. This is Eurytides harmodius (Doubleday, 1846).

14.01.2011 5:15, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 5:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 5:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No way, can't be Helenus (way smaller), and yes, no label again.

14.01.2011 5:13, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 5:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Battus crassus (Cramer, 1777), nominative.

14.01.2011 5:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 5:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

No, Papilio sataspes can be in Indonesia only. If really caught in India, then it's Papilio helenus. Or no label again?

14.01.2011 5:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Later will shoot its label (if I find), could be wrong.

14.01.2011 5:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

I think, that is Limenitis populi female, dark.

14.01.2011 4:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Limenitis amphyssa in the Caucasus??? Holy god! Underside, please.

14.01.2011 4:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks (also no labels, websearching some time ago).

14.01.2011 4:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is not Graphium aristeus but Graphium nomius (Esper, 1798).

14.01.2011 4:49, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 4:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 4:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Cyrestis thyodamas formosana, Fruhstorfer.

14.01.2011 4:45, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Ideopsis similis persimilis (Moore, 1879).

14.01.2011 4:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Parantica aglea phormion, Fruhstorfer, 1910.

14.01.2011 4:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 4:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Assimilis subspecies (Linnaeus, 1758).

14.01.2011 4:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Assimilis subspecies (Linnaeus, 1758) .

14.01.2011 4:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, my other exotics: sailboats, Nymphalidae.

14.01.2011 4:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

If it's South China (Yunnan, apparently), so must be Sasakia charonda yunnanensis Fruhstorfer.

14.01.2011 4:33, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

What else to see / check ???

14.01.2011 4:30, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Please, don't use yandex. Google definitely wins.

14.01.2011 4:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

First photo of this species will be indexed by yandex.ru. Wow!

14.01.2011 4:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

D and in the internet with them difficult. So let uncertain in Powys.

14.01.2011 4:17, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For millions will not undertake. Not strong and literature.

14.01.2011 4:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thanks, that's in memory of one man (inherited some collection after his death).

14.01.2011 4:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Oh, Vasily, my congrats!!! This one is Lexias hikarugenzi male, Tsukada & Nishiyama, 1980, North Luzon, Philippines. That's the butterfly!

14.01.2011 4:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No exact label, alas. At least, species is identified. Cool.

14.01.2011 4:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, they should be: Moth Nymphalidae Millionia Filipino and some without any labels.

14.01.2011 4:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

These photos can not find # 3139; # 2972

14.01.2011 4:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is 99% sure Euploea blossomae, Schaus, 1929. As for subspecies, that's tricky, the exact label needed. If that was shot at Mindanao island northeast, then it's hilogensis, Yamamoto & Takei, 1992. If Mindanao island south (Mt. Apo), then sibulanensis, Jumalon, 1971. There is female on this photo.

14.01.2011 4:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This one is 99% sure Euploea blossomae, Schaus, 1929. As for subspecies, that's tricky, the exact label needed. If that was shot at Mindanao island northeast, then it's hilogensis, Yamamoto & Takei, 1992. If Mindanao island south (Mt. Apo), then sibulanensis, Jumalon, 1971. There is male on this photo.

14.01.2011 3:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 3:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Gallery " / "Photographer " (I'm here) / "type undefined " or "All photos " / the "Print ". Uhh mistakes can be me, and to correct it :).

14.01.2011 3:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"Gallery " / "Photographer " (I'm here) / "type undefined " or "All photos " / the "Print ". Uhh mistakes can be me, and to correct it :).

14.01.2011 3:31, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

and as these photos to see ???

14.01.2011 3:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry, yes there is no offense whatsoever. It's just that Peter is now worries, and so I think the car with the site and not to just reach right hand. By ECOTA: I will be grateful if you will look my photo # 3577; # 3578; # 3139; # 2972 ​​is already hanging here more than a year in the uncertain (and on molbiole too) and the rest of my earlier laid out exotics you look for the correct (thank God there are no more of me).They Trouble (gets through tenth hand, and sometimes no data).

14.01.2011 1:19, Andrey Sazykin:

It is better (easier and more reliable) probably just delete. Re-start the photos and data is simple.

14.01.2011 1:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I keep not only removal but also the possibility of data edition is the author of the photo is in the processing stage in the LC.

13.01.2011 22:31, Evgeny Komarov:

I wrote on this topic. It is necessary to solve the problem with the ability to delete images author (for any reason, including by reason of error, and when you start in the first place). I'm here in the rough and this is laid out in a thousand years ago, as many as 4 double! This is a standard feature for all photosites.This is not a photo site, but need And this requires the implementation!

13.01.2011 21:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: This species is identified correctly.

13.01.2011 20:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Vasily Feoktistov- there are not synonymous, and mix them very difficult. They are completely different. It can be confused with Stichophthalma louisa Stichophthalma fruhstorferi, and that difference can be seen. Stichophthalma howqua more like Stichophthalma neumogeni they are orange.
Petr Khramov, 22:39 12.01.2011

Basil, the meaning of my message was the following: people are currently on site, looking photos. He agrees that the definition of true (ieHe knows what kind of right). He picks up and presses a button "Confirm", causing confidence to such a snapshot in the future there will be more

Strangely, the man goes and pushes Th wants. When you define the look and point to oshibku- is ignored.Do not think it's my hysteria, and is ready to help with photos and with the definition of almost all day gabitalnyh including the tropics, except golubeschek, riodinid and tolstogolovok

13.01.2011 20:08, Andrey Sazykin:

Loading photos today, and three photos uploaded twice (that I flew Net). Unnecessary remove please. My apologies..

13.01.2011 16:19, Alexandr Zhakov:

Nerice davidi, Oberthur, 1883.

13.01.2011 15:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Imho, not alexis also, as well as the previous one (nearly no spots on its underside).

13.01.2011 15:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

According to Synev 2008, there is no any more similar to.

13.01.2011 15:05, Alexandr Zhakov:

I'd better leave it like that.

13.01.2011 14:08, Evgeny Komarov:

http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3000/ is even less clear to identify! Angle sucks, but I have no other pics of this very butterfly. Let's delete it at all!

13.01.2011 12:36, Peter Khramov:

Dmitriy,
About January 8 - the last time there were a lot of technical updates, photos, and treatments of comments - not so much. Since yesterday there is, on the contrary, the emphasis on processing content.
About the trust - here, as usual, it turns out empirically.Through some (usually not very big) while it becomes clear who is commenting on what a good understanding, and what - not. I think some formal assessments and tolerance on this issue is not worth doing.About occasions to confirm or check - please specify what has changed (from unexplained higher) that have an impact on this attitude?

13.01.2011 12:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.01.2011 12:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.01.2011 12:16, Peter Khramov:

Evgeny, what about http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/3000/? Looks similar to.

13.01.2011 11:38, Evgeny Komarov:

Now just rechecked that once more (digged through my archives) and.... was no reason to doubt. First identifying was right!

13.01.2011 11:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

Yet first identifying was sooner right, so as you can see orange "eyes" on its hind wings which alexis can't have.

13.01.2011 11:01, Evgeny Komarov:

Species was sooner identified wrongly. This one is rather Glaucopsyche alexis.

13.01.2011 11:00, Evgeny Komarov:

Wrong identifying, quite probably. That's rather Glaucopsyche alexis.

13.01.2011 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Glaucopsyche alexis Poda, 1761 (couple).

13.01.2011 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Glaucopsyche alexis Poda, 1761 (female).

13.01.2011 10:16, Evgeny Komarov:

In my photos this one is also named as pylaon! I've just fouled up while uploading :)

13.01.2011 10:11, Evgeny Komarov:

Not jurtina for sure. But ferula is also much doubtful. Basically, this photo is not good for identifying...

13.01.2011 8:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Truly Stichophthalma louisa, Wood-Mason, 1877. There Dmitry Podjogin is right.

13.01.2011 8:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, actually it is Louise and transfer is necessary: ​​http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3934/

13.01.2011 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dmitry calmer. The site has just started work and fix all the problems at once seemed impossible (admin we have one, and a great deal of the work).
By the way: it is not synonymous hour?

13.01.2011 6:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Wrote that Stichophthalma howqua Westwood, 1851 is not defined correctly, the picture Stichophthalma louisa Wood-Mason, 1877. It is still January 8. I understand we need a credit of trust of some in order to properly determine the podverzhdaet. I see no more sense something confirms or check.

13.01.2011 1:48, Peter Khramov:

Meh, species name updated.

13.01.2011 1:42, Peter Khramov:

Comment goes to the species description page.

13.01.2011 1:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Phyllophila obliterata.

13.01.2011 1:40, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Eucarta virgo.

13.01.2011 1:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Z. lonicerae, "uncertain".

13.01.2011 1:38, Peter Khramov:

Uncertain too.

13.01.2011 1:37, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, nemorella, uncertain though.

13.01.2011 1:37, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Pronophila unifasciata...

13.01.2011 1:35, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved to Lamprotes c-aureum.

13.01.2011 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved.

13.01.2011 1:33, Peter Khramov:

Genus and species added, shot moved.

13.01.2011 1:30, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to the new species created.

13.01.2011 1:25, Peter Khramov:

Yet going to A. artemis, "uncertain".

13.01.2011 1:23, Peter Khramov:

Comment moved to the species description page, http://lepidoptera.pro/species/notodonta-ziczac/.

13.01.2011 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Goes to A. rumicis, "uncertain".

13.01.2011 1:21, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.01.2011 1:20, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Triodia sylvina.

13.01.2011 1:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.01.2011 1:17, Peter Khramov:

More suggestions?

13.01.2011 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov:

Identifying tends to go very forward. Actually, it's too late for this species, though maybe that's the reason of its worn-out appearance. Anyway, no other suggestions on the mind.

13.01.2011 1:14, Peter Khramov:

Species databased, shot moved.

13.01.2011 1:11, Peter Khramov:

Considering this as synonym to Alcis bastelbergeri, moved to the very Alcis bastelbergeri. Still "uncertain".

13.01.2011 1:08, Peter Khramov:

Still "uncertain".

13.01.2011 1:07, Peter Khramov:

Well, move it to fairly flown ones...

13.01.2011 1:06, Peter Khramov:

To "uncertain".

13.01.2011 1:05, Peter Khramov:

See, this image is a very popular one...

13.01.2011 1:00, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

13.01.2011 0:59, Peter Khramov:

As far as I can remember, Igor usually shoots somewhere nearby Novorossiysk. Goes to M. cinxia.

13.01.2011 0:57, Peter Khramov:

Thanks, moved.

13.01.2011 0:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Vasily is wrong, nebulosa can be only in the south of Primorye region. This one is Rhyparioides amurensis (Bremer, 1861). You can see it clearly there (reference: Dubalotov): http://www-sbras.nsc.ru/win/elbib/atlas/Arctiidae/258.html.

13.01.2011 0:52, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for approving. Moved.

13.01.2011 0:51, Peter Khramov:

"Uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Species added, photo moved.

13.01.2011 0:45, Peter Khramov:

Species and genus added, shot moved.

13.01.2011 0:45, Alexandr Zhakov:

Plebeius pylaon, Fischer v. Waldheim, 1832, even without looking at its underside. Plus biotope, plus obvious black marginal spots on its hind wings, plus flight period.

13.01.2011 0:42, Peter Khramov:

Species added, photo moved.

13.01.2011 0:39, Peter Khramov:

Goes from "undetermined" to "uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:38, Alexandr Zhakov:

Can't see where it was shot. Not Melitaea diamina 100% sure, so you can move it to Melitaea cinxia without any hesitation.

13.01.2011 0:38, Peter Khramov:

Still left in "uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:37, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

13.01.2011 0:36, Peter Khramov:

New suggestions more?

13.01.2011 0:36, Peter Khramov:

More suggestions wanted...

13.01.2011 0:32, Peter Khramov:

Guys, approve, please, this one is sylvestris not lineola?

13.01.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved to A. adippe.

13.01.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Hey, comrades, your opinions, please, about anything of this photo...

13.01.2011 0:15, Peter Khramov:

The filter is, simply need to update it regularly for new templates. If it were not, the spam would valilsya mountain ... With regards to the authors - as anti-spam method, of course, is good, but should be able to nezaregannye threads and comments, and news (but not foty and types). Therefore, while it is not necessary to separate.In general, I will do what is possible under the present structure. Ps. You can, of course, hang a captcha, but I wanted to without enough - already got all these "enter 3 letters, 5 figures, the name of the president, divide 35 by 18 and enter the fractional part."

12.01.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

12.01.2011 23:39, Peter Khramov:

Actually, yes, there is such a danger. On the other hand, it can not be just a minor comment and confirmation of the type of which the dispute is or is not defined precisely. In general, while the leave, and look, it will be a lot of evidence in a row to override everything else.If there is a lot - then in the list of "Community" will hide them. Moreover, that soon there will be a section in which the individual will go to the comments fotam and previous commentaries / user themes, and there is already possible to confirm easily publish.

12.01.2011 23:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Here's a question arose. There-there any filter from all these "peels, billing " and other crap. Maybe leave the community for authors (ie zaregatsya necessary to write here) and separate guest? And remove my opinion it will be easier.

12.01.2011 23:18, Alexandr Zhakov:

Do not display comments in the confirmation message of some kind. Through conscientious visitors all other comment will be lost. :)

12.01.2011 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:46, Elvir Izmailov:

Hm, that's weird. I identified it as Calliteara pudibunda, so why now it belongs to another taxon? Me personally, I'm definitely just an amateur as for lepidoptera and biology in general. This species was identified at molbiol.ru as such, by Vasily Feoktisov, and I just copied the name.

12.01.2011 22:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Clearly, the way Photo # 4158 endure boldly where I wrote (it's red-stopudovo) probably fell wrong.

12.01.2011 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Goes to females.

12.01.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov:

Guy moved to males.

12.01.2011 22:39, Peter Khramov:

Basil, the meaning of my message was the following: people are currently on site, looking photos. He agrees that the definition is correct (ie, he knows what kind of right). He picks up and presses a button "Confirm", causing confidence to such a snapshot in the future there will be more. If the person does not know whether it is true essno, he did not press.And especially to wander through the gallery just to confirm a bunch of truck - also probably not worth the time spent. But at the same time, viewing the photos - very good will.

12.01.2011 22:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, and what kinds of unconditional confirm? After all, if the photo does not match the mind is always possible to improve. I suppose if you do not know what kind and will not undertake to confirm.

12.01.2011 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Male.

12.01.2011 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female.

12.01.2011 22:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:15, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:15, Evgeny Komarov: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:09, Evgeny Komarov:

Colleagues I ask a question: why on the page describing a kind, in my opinion, absolutely meaningless "gadget ": "Other butterflies with the same set of colors "? See what you see as a comparison. Or why is that? Places, and possible traffic "eating " nemeryannom.And what will happen next? But most importantly - why? What good can be drawn visitors from emerging "Solyanka " ?!

12.01.2011 22:03, Peter Khramov:

Citizens, if the run past the photo page, on which kind of defined right, not too lazy to leave this review. This confirmation will also be helpful, but do it is now even easier - you just need to click "Confirm" in the comments section. And nothing more.

12.01.2011 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sure, move that (didn't know about its synonyms).

12.01.2011 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Yes, it is strange. These two types of back, will have another look / check out other ...

12.01.2011 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Z. minos, uncertain, as images nearby.

12.01.2011 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Z. minos as well as images nearby, status "uncertain".

12.01.2011 19:39, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Z. minos, "uncertain", as well as images nearby.

12.01.2011 19:38, Peter Khramov:

#4017, 4018, 4019, 4020 shots are obviously of the same butterfly. As for minos, Vlad said that's synonym to Zygaena diaphana, so the info is correct. Anyway, move this to minos, "uncertain".

12.01.2011 19:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

No jokes, this is really Calliteara pudibunda. Let's move?

12.01.2011 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Wonder if it can be Calliteara pudibunda?

12.01.2011 18:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

He looked now at the gallery there, but in the classification binding to leave the database is gone. The glitch of some kind?

12.01.2011 18:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Well, it's good, but somewhere before predstavlennst types within a quantity of one picture go. In particular: Eurytides serville; Battus madyes?

12.01.2011 18:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/zyg/zyg_min.htm.

12.01.2011 18:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Also minos, imho.

12.01.2011 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No hope.

12.01.2011 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Whether can it be Z. minos?

12.01.2011 18:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hard with such angle shot: Z. minos? osterodensis? No more than a guess work. For sure, genus Zygaena. Can see even subspecies here! But no go.

12.01.2011 18:06, Peter Khramov:

Home loaded the next batch of photos. This time, the authors were Natalia Demchenko, Alexander Zhakov Algirdas Vilkas Ari Kaynelaynen Dmitry Pozhogin, Elvir Izmailov, Eugene Glebov Sergei Novitsky, Svyatoslav Knyazev and Vasiliy Feoktistov, for which all of them many thanks.

12.01.2011 18:02, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen, please, specify the name and taxon of this species.

12.01.2011 18:02, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen, if somebody can, please, update the name of this species and its taxonomy.

12.01.2011 18:02, Peter Khramov:

Dames et messieurs, if somebody has any idea, please, specify the name and taxon of this species.

12.01.2011 18:02, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen, please, who can, name the species and its taxonomic status.

12.01.2011 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Last night and this morning my fault could come loose binding to type some unpublished photos. The names of species remain so today, everything will be restored, do not need to elaborate.

12.01.2011 14:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 2:12, Peter Khramov:

Now and in the search box the site and in the "Name of the species" of uploading photos, the search is not only for the main Latin and Russian names, but in Latin synonyms, as well as additional Russian names. School example: hives can be called Aglais urticae , but you can Vanessa urticae .Previously, if you type «vanes» hives we would not have found. Now - find. However, the feature is relevant primarily for the less commonplace species. Furthermore, the search goes on and embodiments Russian names, and not only at the core. Accordingly, the modified output of results (now shown and Latin synonyms), and at the same time surrounding the new sorting O (A → Z on the Latin name). Summary: The search types is on the main Latin names, synonyms, main Russian title and an additional Russian names.The results show the main Latin and Russian names, as well as Latin synonyms. In the "Name of the species" - similar changes now would not conflict with the program when the user specifies the name that the database runs as a synonym, but not as a main.Note: do not need to load a new view of the base of the site if it is already taking place as a synonym. A photograph is attached to the synonyms, and if you think it should be synonymous with a major title, just leave a comment on the description page of the form. Ps.Once again, I poizvinyatsya the people - because of the ongoing work on technical improvements publication of photos and the response to user comments to the photos and type somewhat delayed (a few days ago published a 145 ph, but now publication offers more than 200, and some comments are waiting for the reaction more since last year).In the near future necessarily moving from the technical side to side content.

12.01.2011 1:06, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one is Monema flavescens, Walker, 1855. The photo of this species, already identified, is at few websites, such as http://www.vokrugsveta.ru/encyclopedia/index.php?title=%D0%91%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BE
%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B8 and http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/rogatnykh/view/201701/?page=0.

12.01.2011 0:23, Peter Khramov:

By the way, with multiple birth until now it has been a poser - views were activated, while they themselves were just kind of in the database. Now everything is fixed, including and the reason for the appearance, so that more of these things is not expected ...

11.01.2011 21:46, Peter Khramov:

Eugene, in the described situation you just do not have any problems as soon as I publish the photos, I immediately activate the corresponding species. Ie when loading does not matter, there is a kind of directory or only in the database.

11.01.2011 21:05, Evgeny Komarov:

But the species in the database, but not in the catalog? How about them? Without moderator transfer them to a directory is impossible? This is a very common situation when shots are available to the species or genera that are not in the catalog (I just put these in a lot of grist).

11.01.2011 20:10, Peter Khramov:

As predicted a few days ago, the site began to work in test mode, a new feature when uploading photos butterfly species that are not found in the database. Now, if you understand that the ship, you can pre-add the required form ( and even genus) in the database, and then later download the pictures to him.Download new types made from the pages of the respective delivery, and delivery - from the pages of the families. In this new kind of / sort of fall for moderation, but to strengthen them and see their pictures in the "Classifications" is possible and before the adoption of Moder. Photos uploaded to the preliminary addition of desired species in the database, for obvious reasons, are processed faster and your useful part in the site gets bigger. However, if the time to download the form not, you still have the option to upload a photo, simply by specifying a new type on the download page. Who is going to try to add species / genus, please register here or mail - everything is OK if there are any problems and comments.

11.01.2011 15:16, Peter Khramov:

Originally built on the base O. Karsholt, J. Razowski (eds.), 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a distributional chacklist. Changes: 1. adds a new species, which are on the list was not (not Europe) and 2. Data is deprecated, changed. But both of these points as a percentage is not very high. Alexander Zhakov proposed focus on http://www.faunaeur.org catalog or blue. In fact, the problem is that the site no restrictions on geography - neither Russian nor Europe will be sufficient. Therefore, the position in the system of some species was taken from funet.fi - there it may not be the most perfect, but it takes into account all sorts of morphological and other exotics. If anyone has any further suggestions for system / classifications - please voiced.

11.01.2011 14:29, Natalia Demchenko:

And just uploaded Acronicta strigosa.

11.01.2011 14:21, Evgeny Komarov:

With the introduction of "not simplistic " system arise following the main problem - to stipulate clearly which system is adopted! Ie some of the published and used classification systems used by butterflies.

11.01.2011 14:10, Natalia Demchenko:

Hada plebeja, maybe.

11.01.2011 11:17, Basil Sergienko:

Not biselata at all but Cabera pusaria fairly flown.

11.01.2011 9:24, Tatyana Gordeeva:

This one is some spadicearia, genus Xanthorhoe, probably, spadicearia D.et S.

11.01.2011 9:00, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Some bastelbergeri, genus Alcis, probably A.deversata Stgr.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:34, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:33, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Erannis golda.

11.01.2011 2:48, Peter Khramov:

Now, on page sort but his name is also available information about the author and the year of first description (if available in the database of the site).

11.01.2011 2:25, Alexandr Zhakov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

11.01.2011 1:42, Alexandr Zhakov:

This one belongs to another subfamily.

11.01.2011 1:11, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

11.01.2011 1:10, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

11.01.2011 1:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pandemis corylana (Fabricius, 1794).

11.01.2011 1:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Pandemis corylana (Fabricius, 1794).

11.01.2011 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Viktor, thanks for reporting about this bug. Just repaired that, now there should be your photo as it's meant to be.

11.01.2011 0:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Viktor, I see the same. Maybe, some technical bug.

10.01.2011 23:56, Victor Titov:

Hey, what's that? Can't see Argynnis laodice photos I uploaded? The image on this page is not mine but of some eggs...

10.01.2011 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Several times the question pop up in the "Community", now I received another letter on the subject. Therefore, to create a separate "news", which describe his vision of the issue, and everyone can comment on and express opinions, agree or argue. So, now online classification of butterflies simplified: only used the main taxa - species, genus, family. It can actually cause discomfort - for example, in a variety of delivery Nymphalidae displayed in alphabetical order, instead of being sorted, indicating subfamilies.Accordingly, it can not be selected and types, for example, the popular superfamily Papilionidea . And so on. In the old version of the site were superfamily and subfamily, and other tribes. Despite the above disadvantages, the website operates a simplified system.The idea is this: before you enter additional taxa, we need to streamline core.Indeed, the fact that a simplified system, it becomes irregular (the main taxa remain and the introduction of more), but by piling up heaps of taxa for pravlnost parting which no one is responsible, not good not wait. As soon as entered in the test operation of the system, allowing users to publish to offer new types and kinds, as well as directly (not through the comments) indicate an error in the classification and outdated information in the system (for example,on the tribal affiliation of any kind) - the administrator in this case will only activate these changes, or vice versa, to veto.As a result, even if a simplified system should become more complete, people will not have to wait a long time before the site will be new species, and the relevance and adequacy of the classification used in the site should be up considerably. If all goes well with chocolate, as described above, then I return additional taxa, and they can work in the same way as with main. Questions, comments - Wellcome here or in the mail.

10.01.2011 18:16, Basil Sergienko:

Not Agriopis aurantiaria, but most probably Erannis golda, Djakonov, 1929. Anyway I'm not long in far east ones. Where this was shot is the most interesting question there.

10.01.2011 17:38, Peter Khramov:

Rhode corrected, thanks for the tip. Regarding subfamilies - in general, yes, ideally, should be included and the subfamily, and other tribes, the benefit of that information about many of them in the database actually is. But this opportunity, I plan to connect a little later, when the classification of online order forms, and some of whom will follow this order.

10.01.2011 17:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, I want to offer some of the family into subfamilies break.
In particular Drepanidae divided into two subfamilies: Drepaninae (serpokrylki themselves) and Thyatirinae (sovkovidki). And in them the same (serpokrylkah) race Achyla actually Achlya. Yesterday flavikornisa downloaded and base race has not been found.

10.01.2011 16:40, Peter Khramov:

Besides inadequate declines on the main page razedla "classification", a similar problem was found and fixed in the pages of the families.

10.01.2011 15:16, Peter Khramov:

Previously, in the field "Name of the species" must be entered (even with autocomplete) the Latin name of the species, and nothing more - only in this case, the photo is automatically picks up to the desired form. Otherwise - the name of the photo was from, but it could mean only hitch admin.Now, if you would like to avoid typing the name and use the auto-complete and easy skopipastit it from somewhere, even with the additional data (author, year, etc.) - Can safely and do: Photo still be picked up to the desired form.
Examples of valid data in the field "Name of the species' for Mnemosyne:
Parnassius mnemosyne (worked before)
Parnassius mnemosyne (Linnaeus, 1758) - now works
Parnassius mnemosyne na fone fontana - now also work
Note that nothing really bad will happen if the picture does not mesh with a view - I can always make a coupling by hand.But the less manual work, the faster and more accurate passes publication of new materials.

10.01.2011 14:43, Peter Khramov:

When loading large pictures previously could not be generated previews (in a private office in this case appear the names of species instead of thumbnails), and instead reports a successful startup in the browser could be given a blank white page. Most of this should not be.If someone suddenly appears again - always signaled in the "community" or by mail. Dmitry Pozhogin Viktor Titov - note, some of your photos have been added to this moment, there are such glitches. They do not need to reboot after treatment with them everything will be OK.

10.01.2011 13:25, Peter Khramov:

Moved then.

10.01.2011 11:53, Tatyana Gordeeva:

This caterpillar can be some of euphorbiae, probably, H.euphorbiae L.

10.01.2011 2:31, Peter Khramov:

Now, on the public page of this section available information about the number of photos and / or comments on the types and photos published by each of the authors. With the number of pictures is a link to author's gallery, a number of comments - all comments on photos and descriptions of the types made by the author. For the time being we have 78 people ...

10.01.2011 1:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Species was identified wrongly, that's sooner Satyrus ferula (Fabricius, 1793), or nearby to. If was shot somewhere at Ural, should be something different.

10.01.2011 0:19, Peter Khramov:

Went to Agapeta hamana.

10.01.2011 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes then to Zerynthia polyxena.

10.01.2011 0:18, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Lycaena virgaureae.

10.01.2011 0:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Maniola jurtina.

09.01.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov:

Danke, goes to Polyommatus icarus.

09.01.2011 23:57, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved.

09.01.2011 23:56, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to A. straminella.

09.01.2011 23:39, Peter Khramov:

Aha, moved to.

09.01.2011 21:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Celypha striana.

09.01.2011 21:13, Peter Khramov:

Accordingly, the catalog of the base added 37 new species.

09.01.2011 21:03, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agriphila straminella (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775).

09.01.2011 20:54, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775), male.

09.01.2011 20:53, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775), female.

09.01.2011 20:52, Alexandr Zhakov:

Maniola jurtina (Linnaeus, 1758), female.

09.01.2011 20:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lycaena virgaureae, male, Linnaeus, 1758.

09.01.2011 20:50, Alexandr Zhakov:

Zerynthia polyxena ([Denis & Schiffermuller], 1775).

09.01.2011 20:48, Alexandr Zhakov:

Polyommatus icarus (Rottemburg, 1775), female.

09.01.2011 20:48, Vlad Proklov:

Yes, that is Euproctis similis.

09.01.2011 20:46, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agapeta hamana (Linnaeus, 1758).

09.01.2011 20:45, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

09.01.2011 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov:

Hyles euphorbiae (Linnaeus, 1758).

09.01.2011 20:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Triodia sylvina Linnaeus, 1761.

09.01.2011 20:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Triodia sylvina Linnaeus, 1761 (hopely, not wrong).

09.01.2011 20:41, Tatyana Gordeeva:

Some Noctuidae caterpillar. Genus Acronicta, most probably A.rumicis.

09.01.2011 20:20, Peter Khramov:

In the first after a long time of publication - photographs, not yet involved in the work of the old version and new pictures uploaded to the authors this year.Thanks Natalia Demchenko, Tanya Mass, Hope Flegontova, Evgeny Glebov, Ari Kaynelaynenu, Leonid Kelsievu, Alexander Kukharenko, Sergei Novitsky, Andrey Ponomarev, Denis Tumanov Vasiliy Feoktistov and for the photos.

09.01.2011 19:14, Tatyana Gordeeva: This species is identified correctly.

09.01.2011 19:09, Tatyana Gordeeva: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

As for taxonomy, its place is still being classified, but in Zabaikal'ye region most probably this should be Actias gnoma (by the way, added in the Regional Red List) or, in case the taxonomy will be changed somehow, Actias artemis.

09.01.2011 19:02, Peter Khramov:

The maximum for a week there should be a function of batch file uploads (approximately - in zip-archive) followed prostanovkoy information for each photo.In case you wish to download many photos, this feature can save a lot of time, so I recommend to wait vysheozvuchennogo light moment, and then shipping. The news was voiced as to be ready.

09.01.2011 18:28, Tatyana Gordeeva:

These caterpillars are not Acronicta. Two rear glands mean Lymantriidae, next, Euproctis similis.

09.01.2011 18:03, Nikolai Vladimirov:

I've got it later that there was no need to choose any status to comment photo :)

09.01.2011 11:51, Peter Khramov:

Lord, those photos of new species that have already been loaded will be properly handled. Moreover, if someone does not see the message and now load a photo, it will also be normally processed - it's not so tough ...

09.01.2011 10:30, Evgeny Komarov:

While'll hold, OK! But also already lie in the LC number.

09.01.2011 10:27, Evgeny Komarov:

Wrong identifying. This is Drasteria picta! Correct myself.

09.01.2011 2:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

OK, Peter. Just one or two LC such species are already on (let lie far).

09.01.2011 1:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved.

09.01.2011 1:48, Peter Khramov:

Nikolay, thanks for noticing, shot moved to Brenthis ino. Also worth noticing that it's rather weird to claim "this species is identified wrongly" in case this very species got no any mark yet ;--) However, I also take part in these "weirds", giving opportunity to choose such status while this option should be inactive...

09.01.2011 1:47, Peter Khramov:

Image goes to Timandra comae.

09.01.2011 1:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Angerona prunaria.

09.01.2011 1:45, Peter Khramov:

Subspecies updated.

09.01.2011 0:45, Peter Khramov:

Dmitri, the basis of the system - the list of O. Karsholt, J. Razowski (eds.), 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a distributional chacklist, provided at the time of Vlad Proklova. Regarding the disputes - yes, a lot of them and disputes, and the innovations and revisions. I, for example, in general for all new infoy unable to keep up, so even now, the commentary clearly shows that not all the relevant data in the system.If possible, we will correct (now I have some obstruction to other functions of the site, so slow down the reaction to the new commentary and new uploaded photo, but it is temporary, I hope: -) With regards to amenities - yes, me too at first lacked the absence of satyrs among families.Especially now in the site are not used subfamily, but I think the best is to stay on a single host system, not to be sprayed onto the twitching back and forth, and work on improving functionality and increasing the amount of content.over time will need to return the intermediate taxa, but just when to question the classification of the situation will be clearer, for now, this topic remains very open. If you have an idea of ​​another system for the base - Welkom, in the theme, if there is a comment on the individual types - Wellcome in comments to species.

09.01.2011 0:33, Peter Khramov:

Please do not upload photos of the butterflies that are not available in the database of the site (ie that are not issued automatically in the field "Name of the species" during the set) until 11 January 23.59 - is now in the process of creating a system update download for these species. It may be prepared before, in any case, I did accomplish your goal further on the news.

08.01.2011 23:47, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

For what is the classification system ??? Combining many families in the Nymphalidae quite controversial, and to identify and seek out more convenient for families

08.01.2011 23:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Papilio palinurus daedalus Felder 100% sure.

08.01.2011 23:09, Peter Khramov:

Vasily, don't raise it up, I've already got it listed. Now a little bit busy with finishing and stuff, so may slow down as for comments and, especially, new species. Get it done the nearest days, no fuss.

08.01.2011 23:06, Peter Khramov:

Moved to atalanta.

08.01.2011 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Vasiliy Feoktistov had just offered to make unpublished data fotah editable, delete, probably also true (takes, for example, part of the cargo). Ok, I'll do before going. The maximum for a week will be ready.

08.01.2011 22:50, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Male.

08.01.2011 22:49, Evgeny Komarov:

Several times already faced with a situation where as a result of its own mistakes uploaded the wrong photo. Alas, something to do after the download is no longer possible.In my opinion it is necessary to provide the ability to delete pictures authors (at least at the stage where they have not yet passed the stage of selection and validation)! Why unnecessary problems "Georgia " Admin?

08.01.2011 22:42, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

This is Stichophthalma louisa, Wood-Mason, 1877.

08.01.2011 18:32, Alexandr Zhakov:

Chrysorithrum amata (Bremer et Grey, 1853), the author of the shot put at molbiol.ru another photo of this species identified right.

08.01.2011 18:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Let's get these classified too.

08.01.2011 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.01.2011 18:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.01.2011 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

08.01.2011 18:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Up

08.01.2011 18:04, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Angerona prunaria.

08.01.2011 18:03, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Ypsolopha ?nemorella

08.01.2011 18:03, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Ypsolopha ?nemorella

08.01.2011 18:02, Nikolai Vladimirov:

Timandra comae.

08.01.2011 18:01, Nikolai Vladimirov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Brenthis ino.

08.01.2011 17:57, Nikolai Vladimirov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

Seems to be Zygaena lonicerae.

08.01.2011 17:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Corydalis good, but it is still in the database do not. Vitali, just download it from the LC "Upload new photos " and eventually the form will appear on the site.

08.01.2011 17:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Approve: that is truly polytes, but let's at least database Jordani. I just fouled up a little bit.

08.01.2011 15:52, Vitaly Gumenuk:

Odonthosia carmelita

08.01.2011 15:40, Alexandr Zhakov:

Deltote (Protodeltote) pygarga (Hufnagel 1766).

08.01.2011 15:34, Alexandr Zhakov:

Eucarta virgo (Treitschke, 1835).

08.01.2011 15:25, Alexandr Zhakov:

Phyllophila obliterata (Rambur, 1833).

08.01.2011 15:03, Dmitriy Pozhogin:

Object to Papilio jordani, Fruhstorfer, 1906 (possibly wrong identifying). This is Papilio polytes male, Linnaeus, 1758.

08.01.2011 14:42, Peter Khramov:

Clear. For this option you just need to wait for the publication of photos and, accordingly, the activation type of site (if it can be to add comments). In general, for all kinds of corrections can be made and editing of the newly downloaded ph, and those that have already been published (in particular, the data on the location / time of shooting). But if I do it, then later, that is.k. Now there are quite a large list of priorities.

08.01.2011 14:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Already he is thrown off. Just uploaded a new type, and then began a brief description scribbled (only in the database was not anything). This is my case.

08.01.2011 14:26, Peter Khramov:

It is technically possible. Only still not very clear cases where such may be required (or rather, the cases may be, but very rare, and when it is possible to e-mail me a message just to throw).The new mind - and in that case you can add photos and not the description of the property type? In general, Vasily, otpishi more cases in which it is required.

08.01.2011 14:14, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen, if you notice that the site is something does not work or does not work at all, shows not what you need, or shows something bad - please do not be lazy and clear message about this to my e-mail or in the section " The Community "at the site.If you find that everything is OK, and you are just something not understand - I will explain in detail, and if true errors in the site - try to quickly fix. It goes without saying, I test all sections of the site before they spread, but, as experience shows, fast track is not all the problems.

08.01.2011 13:22, Peter Khramov:

The last few days to the kinds of comments can not be loaded, while comments on photos were normal. Now everything is fixed, to the kinds of comments is quite a load. I remind you once again that on the page with the photo commented on specific shots, and all the comments regarding the species as a whole, rather than a single photo, you need it to starnitsu zagruzayutsya species.

08.01.2011 12:49, Alexandr Zhakov:

Agrotis crassa is out of date, now it's named Agrotis bigramma (Esper 1790).

08.01.2011 12:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That raised the question of whether to allow users to adjust from his LC data to photos that have already been downloaded, but not yet been published (and sometimes the need arises). In particular, when the form is loaded to the new site is that it added.
Perhaps to do so?

08.01.2011 1:16, Alexandr Zhakov:

This species is identified wrongly, should be Acontia melanura (Tauscher, 1809).

07.01.2011 23:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Think, this case should be cleaned, so as even me often mash up these two species, chrysitis and stenochrysis. And tutti should be deleted.

07.01.2011 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Diachrysia tutti, Kostrowicki 1961, synonym to Diachrysia stenochrysis (Warren 1913) at NOCTUIDAE EUROPAEAE. Vol. 10: Goater, B., L. Ronkay & M. Fibiger: Catocalinae & Plusiinae. 2003.

07.01.2011 23:31, Alexandr Zhakov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Diachrysia tutti, Kostrowicki 1961, synonym to Diachrysia stenochrysis (Warren 1913) at NOCTUIDAE EUROPAEAE. Vol. 10: Goater, B., L. Ronkay & M. Fibiger: Catocalinae & Plusiinae. 2003.

07.01.2011 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Diachrysia stenochrysis, Warren, 1913.

07.01.2011 22:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Changed: Diachrysia stenochrysis, Warren, 1913.

07.01.2011 22:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Diachrysia stenochrysis, Warren, 1913.

07.01.2011 22:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Diachrysia stenochrysis, Warren, 1913.

07.01.2011 20:12, Alexandr Zhakov:

This species is named right, but it belongs to a different genus, so the full name is Sideridis (Aneda) rivularis (Fabricius 1775).

07.01.2011 20:00, Peter Khramov:

Now you can choose the types of display only with illustrations (for example, because you are no pictures, no description is not interested) or just without pictures (for example, if you want to know which photos available you should download first).

07.01.2011 16:19, :

Good luck to your project!

07.01.2011 15:45, Peter Khramov:

Launched the first E-mail mailing list for users of the site.

Those who during the registration or later in the settings removed daw "Receive newsletter", respectively, will not receive a mailing letters
Those who did not remove the checkbox or put down her later - get this letter, and the next
Those who are registered at the time of the jackdaws on the site did not have any, will receive only one, the first letter.If they have the desire to receive e-mail in the future - you need to put the appropriate checkbox in the personal settings on the website and until no spam coming from the site will not
If anyone will be some glitches to give someone wanted to get, but have not received any quite the opposite - do not hesitate,let me know by mail or unsubscribe in the comments to this news.

06.01.2011 23:42, Peter Khramov:

In addition to the standard distribution news site, is now available subscription pro-choice.If you are able and willing to assist in determining the types of butterflies from the photos, subscribe to the pro-newsletter, and then once a week or two you will be sent a letter with a list of photos, species of butterflies which is not defined or is not defined precisely. subscription / formal reply to the pro-mailing carried out in the same place and for the main "My Account» → «Settings».

06.01.2011 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Now in the catalog next to each attribute value indicates the number of species on the site, this value satisfying.For example, Green (90) means that the site has a catalog of 90 species of butterflies, which are characterized by green and Palaearctic (1082) says that in the catalog 1082 species that fly in the Palaearctic zoogeographical region.

05.01.2011 21:26, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined".

05.01.2011 21:25, Peter Khramov:

Goes then to P. ruralis.

05.01.2011 21:18, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Y. evonymella, "uncertain".

05.01.2011 21:15, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved.

05.01.2011 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes from "undetermined" to Crambus lathoniellus.

05.01.2011 14:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

05.01.2011 14:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

05.01.2011 13:58, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Laothoe populi.

05.01.2011 10:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Vlad, this information is assured on a forum. I offered it there as S. ocellata (caught nearby), but guys re-identified it successfully.

05.01.2011 1:29, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

S. planus, must be some mistake about identifying.

05.01.2011 1:28, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

Phragmatobia ?luctifera.

05.01.2011 1:27, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

05.01.2011 1:27, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

05.01.2011 1:27, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

Ostrinia nebulalis complex.

05.01.2011 1:25, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

05.01.2011 1:23, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

Hypsopygia sp.

05.01.2011 1:22, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

or evonymella, or vicariad.

05.01.2011 1:22, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

05.01.2011 1:21, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

05.01.2011 1:20, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

05.01.2011 1:18, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

alternata.

05.01.2011 1:18, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

Amata phegea.

05.01.2011 1:15, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Laothoe populi.

05.01.2011 0:36, Peter Khramov:

Weeel, undetermined yet.

04.01.2011 11:50, Peter Khramov:

I think it should be the determinant of longer flushed ease and accuracy than any other. On the other hand, the active site - more directory that can help in the determination. But for the catalog - yes, and volume, and can see - everything is important. As for the voting - is interesting to me is feedback comparison of old and new versions, ieDo people feel changes for the better or not. The interests of their daily vote, yes ...

04.01.2011 11:26, Natalia Demchenko:

The determinant is red in the first volume of information, the number of listed species, a brief description, the possibility of a good look at the object. It is a time and a lot of work.
Get - people vote their interest :)

03.01.2011 22:47, Peter Khramov:

Ladies and gentlemen, on many pages, particularly in the main, is a form of voting. Please do not be lazy and put down their opinions on the issue. Ps. To vote online registration is not required.

02.01.2011 23:16, Peter Khramov:

On the site there was a section « Help », which will be helpful to understand how new users and experienced juzverej.Moreover, fixed bugs in decline in the pages of families and genera in the "classification", and references to previously visited pages now are somewhat different in color from the rest, which will allow even easier to surf through the site.Finally, a slightly modified form of the top menu - now all that relates to user account shifted to the left and on the right there was a reference to the new section.

01.01.2011 13:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Another tried to throw. Everything is OK (quite comfortable).

01.01.2011 12:43, Peter Khramov:

Basil, and you. Photos see all OK. For species that are in the base of the site it works even better - there is the name of the dial is completely not necessary, the program picks up (similar to search).

01.01.2011 9:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, Happy New Year! Thank you for the opening of the loading capabilities. It works well and has already tested (uploaded a new page for the form of the kind of scoops Amphipyra).

31.12.2010 23:58, Peter Khramov:

Thus, the system is updated and working again. To upload photos of butterflies, you need to register online, log into your account and then to "Loading new photos" private office or first go to a page with a description of the desired type of butterfly, and then - on the link "Submit your photo of this kind."

31.12.2010 22:44, Peter Khramov:

In the "Community" have the opportunity to select the type of comments. Separately, you can view comments for photos, messages from guest / blog and news, as well as comments to the descriptions of species of butterflies. It goes without saying, it is still possible all comments and posts in a row.

31.12.2010 18:33, Peter Khramov:

Now, on the description page of the form displayed other types of butterflies, which are characterized by the same set of colors, and for this species.

31.12.2010 17:33, Peter Khramov:

Now you can sort types are selected not only Latin, but also Russian name (species whose Russian name is not checked, will go in the beginning, but after they A → Z).

30.12.2010 21:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Peter, Thanks: Tepёr all right. And I played with a resolution, is useless, that the same story I had.

30.12.2010 21:50, Peter Khramov:

Yes, sometimes on small resolutions and taking into account the height of the crop could be missed. Who is corrected, everything should be OK.

30.12.2010 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sent mail screen.

30.12.2010 20:20, Peter Khramov:

In general, it should not be, there is trimming when the comment is too long. Send me a screenshot indicating the resolution of the monitor, OK?

30.12.2010 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, again bid. Maybe this framework somehow modify (to comment when stretched long). And then he climbs on predydyduschy and easy to read. Or just me? I'm talking about "Community ".

30.12.2010 17:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

We kindly request to all !!! If the network has run into similar (clones of this site), always (with reference) unsubscribe here or mail site. Evil must be fought. And: The country must know its "heroes ".

30.12.2010 16:54, Peter Khramov:

Previous sort pochikal. A recent example - obabochkah.info.

30.12.2010 16:00, Peter Khramov:

Ok, I put on the list of problems ...

30.12.2010 14:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No, not hard copy, of course (I'm so out of habit). And what about the other pages of the site: not bad, would do it for the convenience.

30.12.2010 14:21, Peter Khramov:

Basil, links in comments pokazyvaayutsya plain text in order to avoid perespama. On the other hand, they're not so often seems to be, and copy the address bar, if necessary, should not cause major problems. Or is it cause?
ZYAnd if you're about links to other pages on the same site that are spam, by itself, can not be, that on this subject you can think about how to automate the process of ...

30.12.2010 13:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter is a good idea, would be active links in comments to make (something to move them "click " can be. There is such a possibility.

30.12.2010 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Viktoria, this one is definitely not P.blumei. Once I uploaded blumei there, so that one was pure blumei (compare at least the leg spurs): http://lepidoptera.pro/species/papilio-blumei/.

29.12.2010 21:02, Peter Khramov:

Viktoria (Viktoria?), want to pay your attention to these:
1. On the species image page you may comment the very photo (e. g. if the species was identified successfully or the image is cool by itself), and not the species. You should comment species on the species description page, e. g. at http://lepidoptera.pro/species/nymphalis-antiopa/.
2. Please, don't copypast or quote other websites to add the species description there, especially if these websites are not well-known or reputed. Thus, your description comment deleted. Thanks.

29.12.2010 20:37, Peter Khramov:

Improving the next section. Instead, a guest on the site earned blogoobrazny engine, ie users are now not just unsubscribe message to the guest, and create a new topic, to which the administrator can publish comments and the authors of the site, as well as registered and unregistered users - that is, Everyone. In addition, the "Community" is now possible to track more and comments to photos and descriptions of species, as well as news (which now also can comment). In the near future - the possibility of selection of topics / posts / comments on the sections to which they relate, and the ability to separately track the comments on those topics, types and images that are registered user published or commented previously on the site. Ps.Please write in the mail or a website, if the access time to the "Community" will be more than 5 seconds (provided that the rate of connection to the network - decent, and other site pages open much faster).

29.12.2010 12:39, Victoria Kiselova: This species is identified correctly.

29.12.2010 12:32, Victoria Kiselova:

That is Papilio palinurus for sure, nevertheless it's very similar to Papilio blumei.

28.12.2010 15:36, Victoria Kiselova:

Nymphalis antiopa Linnaeus, 1758 = Vanessa antiopa.

25.12.2010 17:58, Peter Khramov:

Thanks. Got them together and moved photos.

25.12.2010 17:58, Peter Khramov:

Danke for remark. Got these two species together and moved images.

25.12.2010 17:47, Peter Khramov:

Pavel, thank you for noticing. That's it, photos were signed wrongly. Moved to Papilio thoas.

25.12.2010 17:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Archaeoprepona demophon.

25.12.2010 17:41, Peter Khramov:

Ambiguous photo of a pupa moved.

25.12.2010 17:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Cerura erminea.

25.12.2010 17:26, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved from "undetermined" to Zygaena minos.

25.12.2010 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Eurois occulta.

25.12.2010 17:23, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved to Eurois occulta.

25.12.2010 17:10, Peter Khramov:

Now - with automatic substitution results. Just type a few (at least two) of the first symbols of the request, and you will be offered several options for families, genera and species, which begin with the same characters.If among them will not be necessary, continue to type a query and automatically selects the options will be more and more like desired.

25.12.2010 15:36, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Boloria eunomia.

25.12.2010 3:40, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

25.12.2010 3:39, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

25.12.2010 3:38, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

22.12.2010 16:48, Peter Khramov:

The problem could arise under the articles and on personal pages of authors. Who can not.

21.12.2010 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved then to "identified successfully".

21.12.2010 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

21.12.2010 23:48, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

21.12.2010 23:48, Peter Khramov:

We start with the oldest process, some of them stayed with the old version and dated 2009 (the last before disconnecting interactive in 2009). Soon we come to the most recent. Thanks to everyone who commented and separate - Vlad Proklova for review. Remember, if you wish to comment on a photo, specify an image where views or confirm / refute the previous definition, it is enough to enter your login / password to the site, noted on page photos, whether the definition, and leave a comment if necessary.

21.12.2010 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Eurois occulta.

21.12.2010 23:45, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Cabera pusaria,"uncertain".

21.12.2010 23:42, Peter Khramov:

Goes then to Mythimna impura.

21.12.2010 23:40, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Calamia tridens.

21.12.2010 23:35, Peter Khramov:

The block with the names and photographs of species under "Directory" and under "Latest updates" now displays information about the family to which the species belongs. It will be vyvodittsya another infa, and registered users will be able to customize the output to block the information for themselves.

21.12.2010 22:57, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to "identified successfully".

21.12.2010 20:40, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

21.12.2010 20:40, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

21.12.2010 20:40, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

21.12.2010 20:39, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

21.12.2010 20:39, Vlad Proklov:

The item is so worn-out that I can't say anything for sure.

21.12.2010 20:39, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

21.12.2010 20:38, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

21.12.2010 20:38, Vlad Proklov:

I. emarginata.

20.12.2010 16:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Looks: fixed.

20.12.2010 16:11, Peter Khramov:

Subsection addresses the latest updates on the appropriate links corrected. In the guest disabled extra special characters in messages. In the "classification" Fixed bug nepokaza family pages delivery.

20.12.2010 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Thanks for the tip. Corrected.

20.12.2010 10:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Sing Trouble campaign: I click on the title page of the latest updates and can not find (Opera 11.00). He writes: "hecta: the above form is not in the directory site ".
Fixed.

20.12.2010 1:18, Peter Khramov:

Yesterday, there could be problems with entering into your account in the latter recorded in 2009 users. Bug corrected Wellcome.

19.12.2010 23:25, Peter Khramov:

Today might be a problem with zagrzukoy to the kinds of comments. Now fixed a, comments concerning the species can now be safely placed on the pages of the species and not the individual pictures.

19.12.2010 23:11, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M. cinxia.

19.12.2010 23:08, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Sergey Kotov is absolutely right!

19.12.2010 23:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

australis (synonym to alfacariensis).

19.12.2010 23:04, Eugene Karolinskiy:

australis (synonym to alfacariensis).

19.12.2010 20:52, Eugene Karolinskiy:

Th. sylvestris.

19.12.2010 20:51, Eugene Karolinskiy:

These are all O. sylvanus. True venata lives in Russian Far East.

19.12.2010 20:39, Eugene Karolinskiy:

This one is not Scolitantides vicrama. Quite possibly Plebeius pylaon, not sure of that though.

19.12.2010 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

As far as I can remember, Vanessa atalanta, Linnaeus, 1758.

19.12.2010 17:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lamprotes c-aureum, Knoch, 1781, 100% sure.

19.12.2010 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Moma alpium, Osbeck, 1778.

19.12.2010 17:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pronophila unifasciata, Lathy, 1906 ssp. kennethi (underside).

19.12.2010 17:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pronophila unifasciata, Lathy, 1906 ssp. kennethi (up). South America (no details, no any label).

19.12.2010 15:39, Peter Khramov:

After a long stagnation in the update site is laid out a new version. Briefly about the changes and handling:

Some pages are available only for the species in which the site has at least a brief description and / or illustration. Also, only these species are in the "Directory". In the "Classification" there are all kinds, includingand those for which no descriptions and photos
In a completely new section "catalog" it is possible to select any combination of types of values ​​of several attributes. Now available size selection of the front wing, family, color, time and flight of zoogeographic region. Ieif you want to try to determine the type of butterfly or feel the diversity of these same species, now it is easier to do in the catalog, not in the gallery
Something similar to the section "catalog" of the old version of the site is now in the "Classification".But it is better decorated and illustrated
Restored interactive part - available for the registration of new users accounts registered earlier, commenting on the photos and descriptions of the types of works Guest.Upload new photos temporarily sedated, but now it is really a short time
In the section "Latest updates" modified design, including is now available in addition to the names and illustrations preview
On the description of the individual species are now only two free field - with food plants and additional information.Everything else comes under the category of formal characteristics and is used for free samples in the catalog (same color, size, etc.) In general, many of the descriptions of harvested water.In addition, it is now used two illustrations (if available on the site), and for a list of species of the same genus are not only the names but also the preview illustration
Removed extra photos - those for which the site has better doubles. Changed illustrating the kinds of pictures
Slightly redesigned.Added Russian family names. Fixed many typos. Fixed some bugs with the display name of the authors in the full name of the species. Fixed bug with extra characters that appear sometimes in the full name of the species.The interfaces added a few more controls, responds not only to click on the element itself, but also the signature to it.

In a short time - a category of assistance on site, which will be explained in detail the principles of the catalog and other sections.In addition, the resumption of the search section (now there is an improvement), and download new photos users, as well as the launch of the section "About" from the general description.
UP: Now all this was done, except for the section about the site, which is abandoned.
Comments on the new website are welcome in guest rooms and in the mail, as well as discussion forums.

19.12.2010 14:17, Peter Khramov:

Launched a new version of the site. With commentaries and wishes - Wellcome here, the guest, as well as the post office and thematic forums.

01.12.2010 23:53, Peter Khramov:

Due to the fact that the web site appear clones Lepidoptera.ru, completely or almost completely copying the contents and layout, it is my duty to note that at the time of publication of this news encibabochka.ru, buterflind.ru and the like have no govnosayty Lepidoptera.ru relation to resource and it is illegal copies. Freaks, in a word.

24.11.2010 19:53, Peter Khramov:

The last few days have not worked as the primary mailbox site. Who at that time I had sent the letter, but did not get an answer - please duplicate messages.

09.11.2010 3:06, Peter Khramov:

Glitches may occur in some cases, the parameters otobore photos.

10.10.2010 17:39, Peter Khramov:

Now, with the default values ​​of the parameters will not be displayed in the gallery Urla, and therefore it will be shorter and easier to manually change.

04.10.2010 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Hypomecis punctinalis.

04.10.2010 23:17, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Hypomecis punctinalis.

01.10.2010 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Due to the changing of the website name the english version is temporary unavailable. In connection with the move of the English version to the new domain, it is not working.

10.09.2010 21:55, Peter Khramov:

In the afternoon, the site could be down (a problem with the equipment hosting provider). Now it repaired and fixed a.

07.04.2010 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Since hundredth already received a message with a request to return the photo of butterfly on site, restored Work photo gallery and display of pictures in the descriptions of butterflies. If one of the authors of his objection to the display of images on the site in its present form it, please report to the e-mail main # lepidoptera.ru.

14.10.2009 9:57, Andrei Frolov:

Sorry, forgot "this is" in my previous comment. Please, update: "Photo is fine and well-known. Worth noticing this is O. scapulalis., not Ostrinia nubilalis image".

14.10.2009 9:56, Andrei Frolov:

Photo is fine and well-known. Worth noticing O. scapulalis., not Ostrinia nubilalis image.

08.10.2009 13:58, Peter Khramov:

Now the extra slashes in the communications users will not be displayed.

08.10.2009 11:06, :

Peter, answer me!
"We are waiting for the start of operation of the site and the possibility to download new pictures " - a quotation
.

03.10.2009 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

"02-10-2009, Denis Tumanov:
us rally the world to bring the administrator of binge! "- A how-to do it?

02.10.2009 20:16, Denis Tumanov:

us rally the world to bring the administrator of binge!

01.10.2009 21:46, Pavel Grudinkin:

I made a mistake, sorry, now it's called like Archaeoprepona non Prepona.

01.10.2009 21:41, Pavel Grudinkin:

And this one can be the very Papilio thoas pupa (not sure though about the species). Maybe, there was some mistake in uploading.

01.10.2009 21:35, Pavel Grudinkin: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Prepona sp. (Nimphalidae), 99% sure that is Prepona demophon, since that one is usually raised.

01.10.2009 21:28, Pavel Grudinkin:

There is an obvious mistake, a photo of another family pupa is placed on this species description page, what is clear Morpho sp. Sorry, didn't get where I should comment that, so do it right over here then.

28.09.2009 23:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Smerinthus planus, Walker, 1856.

27.09.2009 9:54, Evgeny Komarov:

I fully support (20-09-2009, 21-09-2009 Sergey and Vasily Feoktistov)! We are waiting for the start of operation of the site and the possibility to upload new pictures. TB, that some of the previously loaded will have to be corrected. A new general a lot!

25.09.2009 12:58, Sergei Kotov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

This one is A.adippe.

25.09.2009 12:54, Sergei Kotov:

This is Phragmatobia fuliginosa.

25.09.2009 12:41, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

25.09.2009 12:39, Sergei Kotov:

Pleuroptya ruralis (Scopoli, 1763) .

25.09.2009 12:20, Sergei Kotov:

This one is Diaprepesilla flavomarginaria (Bremer, 1864).

25.09.2009 12:15, Sergei Kotov:

Parascotia fuliginaria.

21.09.2009 12:20, :

Well ... I have done for you pictures ...... but here "crisis of the genre " ....
The good thing is conceived .....

21.09.2009 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

I absolutely agree with Sergei.

20.09.2009 23:04, Alexander Korolev:

My guess is Ochlodes subhyalina.

20.09.2009 2:38, Peter Khramov:

No, it is not a reaction to the criticism))

20.09.2009 0:06, :

Is this a reaction to the criticism? Continue to develop the site, you are on the right track.

19.09.2009 17:16, Alexander Korolev:

This is for sure Cerura erminea !!!

19.09.2009 3:34, Peter Khramov:

Sergey, photos can be downloaded when (if) the author (Admin) site out of hard drinking.

19.09.2009 0:52, Alexander Korolev:

Probably, this one is Theresimima ampellophaga.

19.09.2009 0:19, Alexander Korolev:

Seems like Boloria eunomia.

19.09.2009 0:06, Alexander Korolev:

Zygaena minos (Denis & Schiffermuller, 1775). (=Zygaena diaphana Staudinger, 1887).

18.09.2009 20:50, :

When you can upload a photo?

07.09.2009 16:44, Sergei Kotov:

This one is Nymphalis vau-album (=Nymphalis l-album).

07.09.2009 16:43, Sergei Kotov:

This is Nymphalis vau-album (=Nymphalis l-album).

07.09.2009 16:36, Sergei Kotov:

This is Chiasmia clathrata.

07.09.2009 16:35, Sergei Kotov:

Can be Ectropis crepuscularia.

07.09.2009 16:30, Sergei Kotov:

Most probably Hypomecis roboraria.

07.09.2009 16:27, Sergei Kotov: This species is identified correctly.

07.09.2009 16:26, Sergei Kotov:

This one is Eurois occulta.

07.09.2009 16:24, Sergei Kotov:

That's Eurois occulta.

07.09.2009 16:22, Sergei Kotov:

Most probably, that's Cabera pusaria.

07.09.2009 16:18, Sergei Kotov:

This one is Mythimna impura.

07.09.2009 16:13, Sergei Kotov:

This is Calamia tridens.

02.09.2009 19:31, Peter Khramov:

Elvir, download the form off until 14 September. See. news of August 10, .

01.09.2009 23:01, Elvir Izmailov:

I wanted to send a couple of pictures and recorded. But somehow cant download.

20.08.2009 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Cosmia trapezina.

20.08.2009 23:27, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Cosmia trapezina.

20.08.2009 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Well, looks rather similar to. Moved.

10.08.2009 18:59, Peter Khramov:

In connection with the reform of the site, aimed at improving the quality of published information on it, and improving usability of the site functions download photos and user comments (except for comments to a photo) on Lepidoptera.ru temporarily disabled. Your suggestions for new features, and site content is now especially relevant respectively Guest book remains active for your suggestions, by itself, can write and mail.
Estimated date of start of an updated version with new functionality, and work rules - September 14, 2009.

07.08.2009 21:27, Peter Khramov:

Until the end of August. In this regard, the publication of new photos can be a delay, until the complete absence of this publication until September. See. Also news site on the reform .

04.08.2009 10:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Evgeny, you are right. This one is really Idaea emarginata, Linnaeus, 1758. I identified it wrong, my apologies. (http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?bf=1712) or (http://www.lepidoptera.pl/show.php?ID=553&country=PL).

02.08.2009 20:02, Natalia Demchenko:

Fancy Cosmia trapezina?

02.08.2009 20:01, Natalia Demchenko:

Can be Cosmia trapezina?

02.08.2009 20:00, Natalia Demchenko:

Can be Cosmia trapezina?

02.08.2009 17:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Euploea sp.

02.08.2009 17:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Euploea sp.

02.08.2009 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Parantica aglea, Stoll, 1781.

02.08.2009 17:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ideopsis similis, Linnaeus, 1758.

31.07.2009 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Agree. Image goes to Idaea emarginata, though with "uncertain" status.

31.07.2009 20:19, Evgeny Glebov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Rather looks like Idaea emarginata.

31.07.2009 17:12, Peter Khramov:

Processed comments of users on the site so there were new taxa, and some pictures have moved to the status defined.

31.07.2009 17:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Idaea aversata ("uncertain").

31.07.2009 17:06, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Spilosoma lubricipeda.

31.07.2009 17:04, Peter Khramov:

Well, reasonable. Updated: imago changed to female.

31.07.2009 17:04, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Diacrisia sannio.

31.07.2009 17:00, Peter Khramov:

Yes, that's right. Moved to Lycaena dispar.

31.07.2009 16:57, Peter Khramov:

Goes then to Platyptilia pallidactyla.

31.07.2009 16:54, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Idea leuconoe.

31.07.2009 16:49, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Papilio jordani (uncertain).

31.07.2009 16:41, Peter Khramov:

Image goes to Papilio memnon, the second photo is deleted.

31.07.2009 16:36, Peter Khramov:

Goes then to Hypolimnas bolina.

31.07.2009 16:24, Peter Khramov:

Image moved to Lasiommata maera.

31.07.2009 16:23, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Hypolimnas bolina.

31.07.2009 16:17, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Papilio demodocus.

31.07.2009 16:16, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Xanthorhoe biriviata ("uncertain").

30.07.2009 22:28, Evgeny Glebov:

Looks like Eurois occulta, but what about expansion?..

30.07.2009 10:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Idaea aversata, Linnaeus, 1758.

30.07.2009 8:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spilosoma lubricipeda, Linnaeus, 1758.

30.07.2009 8:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female (laying eggs).

29.07.2009 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Diacrisia sannio, Linnaeus, 1758.

29.07.2009 16:32, Peter Khramov:

By Natalia Demchenko, Hope Flegontova, Denis Tumanov, Feoktistov Basil, Eugene Bezgrebelnogo, Alexander Varlamov and Alexander Kukharenko.

26.07.2009 20:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Lycaena dispar, Haworth, 1802.

26.07.2009 18:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Seems to me that this photo is the very double of #3892 published earlier.

26.07.2009 16:05, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Zygaena lonicerae.

26.07.2009 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Platyptilia pallidactyla, Haworth, 1811.

26.07.2009 11:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Platyptilia pallidactyla, Haworth, 1811.

26.07.2009 11:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio jordani, Fruhstorfer, 1902 (male), http://mybutterfly.ru/archive/1/2008-04.

26.07.2009 11:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

A. prunaria male.

26.07.2009 10:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Idea leuconoe, Erichson, 1834.

26.07.2009 9:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Evgeny, "some" Hesperiidae can mean at least 7 genera and about 25 species just in European Russia (1950yy. info). Please, more precise.

26.07.2009 8:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yponomeuta sp.

26.07.2009 8:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio iordani?

26.07.2009 8:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio memnon, Linnaeus, 1758.

26.07.2009 8:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hypolimnas bolina, Linnaeus, 1758?

25.07.2009 20:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

or Cerura erminea, Esper, 1783.

25.07.2009 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lasiommata maera, Linnaeus, 1758.

25.07.2009 19:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Hypolimnas bolina, Linnaeus, 1758.

25.07.2009 19:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Xanthorhoe biriviata, Borkhausen, 1794.

25.07.2009 18:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Papilio demodocus, Esper, 1798.

25.07.2009 17:55, Peter Khramov:

From Hope Flegontova, Oleg Seliverstov, Bezgrebelnogo Eugene and Alexander Varlamov.

25.07.2009 17:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena sp.

25.07.2009 17:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pyrausta aurata, Scopoli, 1763 (not completely sure).

25.07.2009 17:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Cerura vinula, Linnaeus, 1758.

25.07.2009 17:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena lonicerae, Scheven, 1777.

25.07.2009 14:12, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to "identified successfully".

25.07.2009 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Zygaena lonicerae.

25.07.2009 14:09, Peter Khramov:

Image moved to Parthenos sylvia.

25.07.2009 14:06, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Celypha striana.

25.07.2009 14:04, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to Atralata albofascialis.

25.07.2009 14:02, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Orgyia antiqua.

25.07.2009 14:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Lasiommata maera.

25.07.2009 13:58, Peter Khramov:

Image moved from "undetermined" to Ochlodes sylvanus.

25.07.2009 13:55, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to Maniola jurtina.

25.07.2009 13:51, Peter Khramov:

Amen, krushinnaya. Image goes to Celastrina argiolus.

25.07.2009 13:47, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Polyommatus amandus.

25.07.2009 13:42, Peter Khramov:

Well, photo goes to adippe not paphia...

25.07.2009 13:38, Peter Khramov:

Moved then to Pieris napi.

25.07.2009 13:35, Peter Khramov:

Image moved to Ochlodes sylvanus.

25.07.2009 13:33, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Lymantria dispar.

25.07.2009 13:27, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Papilio demoleus.

25.07.2009 13:25, Peter Khramov:

If we consider where it was shot, this one must be palinurus indeed. Photo goes to this species.

24.07.2009 21:21, Oleg Seliverstov:

http://zooexcurs.baikal.ru/butterfly/limantriidae.htm.

24.07.2009 21:13, Evgenie Bezgrebelnyj:

Can be, can be. Somehow similar to.

24.07.2009 21:10, Evgenie Bezgrebelnyj: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2009 21:08, Evgenie Bezgrebelnyj: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2009 21:04, Evgenie Bezgrebelnyj:

Apatura iris.

24.07.2009 21:03, Evgenie Bezgrebelnyj:

Polyommatus amandus.

24.07.2009 20:31, Evgenie Bezgrebelnyj:

Some Hesperiidae.

24.07.2009 20:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2009 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2009 19:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena lonicerae, Scheven, 1777.

24.07.2009 19:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, Denis, you're 100 (99)% right.

24.07.2009 19:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

24.07.2009 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

It's nearly impossible even to make any suggestion. Some of Geometridae?

24.07.2009 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

That's it.

24.07.2009 13:43, Nadin Flegontova:

Me too, and the Russian name of this is Golubyanka krushinnaya.

24.07.2009 11:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Parthenos sylvia, Cramer, 1776.

24.07.2009 10:14, Sergey Demyanenko:

Celypha striana.

24.07.2009 10:09, Sergey Demyanenko:

Atralata albofascialis.

24.07.2009 9:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Orgyia antiqua, Linnaeus, 1758.

24.07.2009 9:43, Sergey Demyanenko:

IMHO, Lasiommata maera.

24.07.2009 9:39, Sergey Demyanenko:

Approve.

24.07.2009 1:43, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus male.

24.07.2009 1:41, Eugene Karolinskiy:

M. jurtina male!!!

24.07.2009 1:28, Eugene Karolinskiy:

C. argiolus.

24.07.2009 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. amandus.

24.07.2009 1:27, Eugene Karolinskiy:

A. adippe male.

24.07.2009 1:26, Eugene Karolinskiy:

P. napi.

24.07.2009 1:25, Eugene Karolinskiy:

O. sylvanus female.

24.07.2009 0:49, Denis Tumanov:

No doubt, Lymantria dispar)))

24.07.2009 0:47, Denis Tumanov:

Papilio demoleus.

24.07.2009 0:45, Denis Tumanov:

Papilio palinurus.

24.07.2009 0:44, Denis Tumanov:

Pericallia matronula (Linnaeus, 1758).

24.07.2009 0:18, Peter Khramov:

From Nikolai Vinogradov, Oleg and Eugene Bezgrebelnogo Selivyorstova.

23.07.2009 19:02, Peter Khramov:

His photos have suggested Dinah Rogatnykh, Natalia Demchenko, Hope Flegontova,
Vasiliy Feoktistov, Eugene Bezrebelny, Andrey Sazykin Ilya Makhov, Oleg Seliverstov Sergey Novitsky, Denis Tumanov Evgeny Glebov Andrey Lyutikov Alexander Biryukov, Iskattsy Radvillov and Alexander Varlamov.

23.07.2009 0:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

22.07.2009 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, photo moved to Clostera albosigma (the species is identified successfully).

22.07.2009 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

21.07.2009 18:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Certainly, Petr and Dina, I did mean this one (just a typo).

21.07.2009 17:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

http://www.entomology.ualberta.ca/browse_results.php?b=geometroid+moths&r=217&ref=b&o=13&c=6#.

21.07.2009 16:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

http://www.stevenanz.com/Main_Directory/Recent%20Photos/2006/Summer_2/source/sigmoid_prominent1403.htm.

20.07.2009 22:23, Natalia Demchenko:

Maniola jurtina, maybe??

20.07.2009 13:18, Peter Khramov:

Image moved to Melanargia epimede.

20.07.2009 13:15, Peter Khramov:

Undetermined still.

20.07.2009 9:35, Denis Tumanov:

Fancy Clostera albosigma, but I think it's not.

20.07.2009 9:21, Denis Tumanov:

Melanargia epimede.

19.07.2009 23:36, Natalia Demchenko:

Crambus lathoniellus ?

19.07.2009 17:00, Natalia Demchenko:

Chiasmia clathrata?

19.07.2009 16:14, Peter Khramov:

Treated user comments for the last time - taxa have been added to the catalog, change captions, some not previously defined snapshots moved into the category defined. Special thanks to Vasiliy Feoktistov for atkivnoe commenting pictures of butterflies.

19.07.2009 16:06, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Araschnia levana (uncertain).

19.07.2009 16:01, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Pyralis regalis.

19.07.2009 16:00, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, moved to Geometra valida.

19.07.2009 16:00, Peter Khramov:

Shot moved to Thetidia albocostaria.

19.07.2009 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to "identified successfully".

19.07.2009 15:53, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Scopula floslactata.

19.07.2009 15:02, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Udea lutealis.

19.07.2009 15:01, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Scopula floslactata.

19.07.2009 14:59, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Eulithis pyropata.

19.07.2009 14:58, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Rivula sericealis.

19.07.2009 14:56, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Lomaspilis opis.

19.07.2009 14:54, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Zygaena osterodensis.

19.07.2009 14:52, Peter Khramov:

Still "uncertain".

19.07.2009 14:52, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Miltochrista miniata.

19.07.2009 14:50, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Eurrhypara hortulata.

19.07.2009 14:48, Peter Khramov:

Image goes from "undetermined" to Xanthia togata.

19.07.2009 14:47, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Satyrium w-album.

19.07.2009 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined" to Melanargia russiae.

19.07.2009 14:41, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Acronicta rumicis.

19.07.2009 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Caught location changed.

19.07.2009 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Caught location changed.

19.07.2009 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Caught location is changed.

19.07.2009 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Caught location changed.

19.07.2009 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Caught location updated.

19.07.2009 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Caught location updated.

19.07.2009 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Where caught: updated.

19.07.2009 14:36, Peter Khramov:

Caught location is changed.

19.07.2009 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Caught location changed.

19.07.2009 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Caught location is changed.

19.07.2009 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Caught location updated.

19.07.2009 14:35, Peter Khramov:

Caught location updated.

19.07.2009 14:23, Peter Khramov:

Updated.

19.07.2009 14:21, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to Melitaea athalia.

19.07.2009 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Pammene aurana.

19.07.2009 14:08, Peter Khramov:

Can guess, meant Amurrhyparia leopardinula was meant. Photo moved to this species.

19.07.2009 9:43, Natalia Demchenko: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

Not sure if it's Aphantopus hyperantus.....:( Butterfly should be twice bigger and have some areas around main spots colored orange. I didn't even see its outside, it was alone and flew away so fast....

18.07.2009 23:22, Andrey Sazykin: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

This is most probably Araschnia levana. Sorry to all for the wrong identifying.

18.07.2009 22:54, Peter Khramov:

Now all registered users of the site can receive E-mail newsletter news site to your mailbox (frequency distribution - primernor once a week). If you wish to receive these emails there - just remove the corresponding checkbox in the Dashboard.All newly registering users can specify whether they have no objection to receiving the mailing, at the time of registration.
The catalog is now instead of specifying "the description and / or photo" shows detail - view of the description, a photo or a description and photo.

18.07.2009 17:32, Dina Rogatnykh:

Yes, looks like such! Thanks, Vasily:)

18.07.2009 14:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ochlodes faunus amurensis, Mabille, 1909.

18.07.2009 14:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Calliteara virginea, Oberthür, 1870.

18.07.2009 14:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pyralis regalis, Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775.

18.07.2009 14:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rhyparioides nebulosa, Butler, 1877 (not sure though).

18.07.2009 14:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thetidia albocostaria Bremer, 1864.

18.07.2009 13:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Geometra valida, Felder, 1875.

18.07.2009 13:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Diaprepesilla flavomarginaria, Bremer, 1864 (http://catocala.narod.ru/geom26.html).

18.07.2009 10:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

http://www.nuzban.scholaris.pl/zwierz/x/xanthict.htm.

18.07.2009 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula floslactata Haworth, 1809.

18.07.2009 9:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Udea lutealis, Hübner 1809.

18.07.2009 8:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula floslactata, Haworth, 1809.

18.07.2009 8:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Aphantopus hyperantus, Linnaeus, 1758.

18.07.2009 8:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eulithis pyropata, Hübner, 1809.

18.07.2009 8:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rivula sericealis, Scopoli 1763.

18.07.2009 8:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lomaspilis opis, Butler 1878.

18.07.2009 8:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena osterodensis, Reiss 1921.

18.07.2009 8:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

May be Cerura felina, Butler, 1877 (not sure).

18.07.2009 8:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Miltochrista miniata, Forster 1771.

18.07.2009 8:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Eurrhypara hortulata, Linnaeus 1758.

18.07.2009 7:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Xanthia togata, Esper 1788.

18.07.2009 7:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Satyrium w-album, Knoch 1782.

18.07.2009 7:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Melanargia russiae, Esper 1783.

18.07.2009 3:14, Peter Khramov:

Image moved to Lethe marginalis.

18.07.2009 3:13, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Lethe marginalis.

18.07.2009 2:10, Peter Khramov:

Pictures sent Dean Rogatnykh, Natalia Demchenko, Hope Flegontova, Vasiliy Feoktistov Sergey Demyanenko, Vladimir Bobrov, Ilya Makhov, Aleksandr Biryukov Andrey Lyutikov Alexander Gorbatsevich, Eugene Bezrebelny Sergei Novitsky, Yevgeny Glebov and Ilya Ustyantsev.Special thanks to the authors who have sent pictures of species that had not previously been illustrated on the website.

17.07.2009 11:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Acronicta rumicis, Linnaeus, 1758.

16.07.2009 21:11, Natalia Demchenko:

Acronicta rumicis?

16.07.2009 20:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where was caught: no info.

16.07.2009 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where was caught: unknown.

16.07.2009 20:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where was caught: no info.

16.07.2009 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where was caught: Sumatra.

16.07.2009 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where it was caught: no info.

16.07.2009 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where it was caught: no info.

16.07.2009 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caught: no info.

16.07.2009 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where it was caught: unknown.

16.07.2009 20:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where was caught: Philippines.

16.07.2009 20:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Was caught in: Malaysia.

16.07.2009 20:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Was caught in: Brazil.

16.07.2009 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where it was caught: no info.

16.07.2009 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where caught: unknown.

16.07.2009 20:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where was caught: unknown.

16.07.2009 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where it was caught: no info.

16.07.2009 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where it was caught: Russian Far East.

16.07.2009 20:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caught: Sumatra.

16.07.2009 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Where was caught: Russian Far East.

16.07.2009 20:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Was caught in: Eastern Africa.

16.07.2009 20:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Caught location: Brazil.

16.07.2009 18:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Melitaea athalia Rottemburg, 1775.

16.07.2009 18:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Melitaea athalia, Rottemburg, 1775.

16.07.2009 11:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta sp.

16.07.2009 10:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Acronicta tridens, Denis & Schiffermüller 1775 (not sure though, approving needed).

16.07.2009 9:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Pammene aurana, Fabricius 1775.

16.07.2009 8:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Can be Amurrhyparia leodardinula, Strand 1919, but I'm not sure (http://www-sbras.nsc.ru/win/elbib/atlas/Arctiidae/267.html).

16.07.2009 1:47, Peter Khramov:

Basil, spammers - it does not friends; -) for the robot is now put a simple protection. Nerobotov need to ban.

16.07.2009 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Shot date changed.

16.07.2009 0:31, Peter Khramov:

Shot date changed.

16.07.2009 0:26, Peter Khramov:

Shot date is changed.

15.07.2009 21:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dear friends, I understand you: car tuning-right thing, but to nature is irrelevant, and the site theme. Please write in the guestbook on the merits.

15.07.2009 0:54, Peter Khramov:

As a species, and supraspecific.

14.07.2009 23:26, Natalia Demchenko:

When and where it was shot/caught: 2009/6/6.

14.07.2009 23:20, Natalia Demchenko:

When and where it was shot: 2009/6/9.

14.07.2009 23:17, Natalia Demchenko:

When and where it was shot: 2009/6/9/. I was wrong, please, update this.

14.07.2009 23:15, Natalia Demchenko:

When and where it was shot/caught: 2009/6/6. I was wrong, please, update this info.

14.07.2009 22:35, Peter Khramov:

If the author in the publication of a picture have data on the time and / or place of capture (for pictures in the field) and fishing (for photos collectible copies), this information is now available to all users of the site. In addition, a supplement published by definition - for example, the age of the larvae, or form / subspecies of butterflies.

12.07.2009 23:52, Peter Khramov:

Added new taxa in the database site, the old one fixed, based on the comments of users to change the signature to many photographs, including the previously defined. Thanks to all who leave their comments.

12.07.2009 23:49, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "uncertain".

12.07.2009 23:47, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to "uncertain".

12.07.2009 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Malacosoma neustria.

12.07.2009 23:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined" to Zygaena minos.

12.07.2009 23:26, Peter Khramov:

Image goes to Zygaena osterodensis.

12.07.2009 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Paratalanta hyalinalis.

12.07.2009 23:22, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Graphium aristeus.

12.07.2009 23:20, Peter Khramov:

Image moved to "identified successfully".

12.07.2009 23:14, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to Macrothylacia rubi.

12.07.2009 23:12, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Pandemis heparana.

12.07.2009 23:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Ochlodes venata.

12.07.2009 23:07, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved from "undetermined" to Nemophora degeerella.

12.07.2009 23:05, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes from "undetermined" to "identified successfully" (Ochlodes venata).

12.07.2009 23:04, Peter Khramov:

Image goes from "undetermined" to "identified successfully" (Diacrisia sannio).

12.07.2009 23:02, Peter Khramov:

Image goes from "undetermined" to Laothoe amurensis (uncertain). Soon you will also be able to add info about when and where photo was shot.

12.07.2009 22:59, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes from "undetermined" to Lomographa bimaculata.

12.07.2009 22:57, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Macaria alternata.

12.07.2009 22:55, Peter Khramov:

Hey, the more suggestions about the same species we have, the better, even for Lycaena virgaureae... So, image goes from "undetermined" to Lycaena virgaureae.

12.07.2009 22:53, Peter Khramov:

Image goes to Lycaena dispar.

12.07.2009 22:52, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to Lycaena dispar.

12.07.2009 22:50, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Lycaena dispar.

12.07.2009 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Image moved to "identified successfully".

12.07.2009 22:48, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

12.07.2009 22:40, Peter Khramov:

Image moved from "uncertain" to "identified successfully" ones.

12.07.2009 22:37, Peter Khramov:

Goes from "uncertain" to Ostrinia palustralis.

12.07.2009 22:29, Peter Khramov:

Still "undetermined".

12.07.2009 22:22, Peter Khramov:

Aricia eumedon is changed in the website database to Eumedonia eumedon. So, image goes from "uncertain" to Eumedonia eumedon.

10.07.2009 21:50, Nadin Flegontova:

Me either not argued, I just noticed this photo was published as "undetermined", so I looked through the image gallery and thought about this very species name assured now.

10.07.2009 10:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actually, there was no any arguing.

10.07.2009 8:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Malacosoma (Clisiocampa) neustria, Linnaeus 1758 (male).

10.07.2009 8:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

Looks very different from M. alternata (dark ribbons seen at the photo).

10.07.2009 7:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You can't tell this difference looking at this photo (red spots), as for other, looks more similar to L. amurensis.

09.07.2009 22:35, Denis Tumanov:

Well, they say "Truth is born of arguments"))))))

09.07.2009 22:33, Denis Tumanov:

aha)

09.07.2009 22:30, Denis Tumanov:

Macrothylacia rubi (Linnaeus, 1758) — female.

09.07.2009 22:29, Sergey Novitckiy:

Since basal spots on its hind wings are larger than distal ones, this one is rather A.nigricornis (or, maybe, A.kruegeri).

09.07.2009 22:29, Denis Tumanov:

or Laothoe populi (Linnaeus, 1758), most evident difference is in its hind wings baseline.

09.07.2009 22:26, Denis Tumanov:

Malacosona neustria.

09.07.2009 22:25, Denis Tumanov:

For sure.

09.07.2009 19:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Zygaena minos, Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775.

09.07.2009 19:01, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Lycaena dispar, Haworth, 1802

09.07.2009 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Lycaena dispar, Haworth, 1802 (male).

09.07.2009 19:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Lycaena dispar, Haworth, 1802 (female).

09.07.2009 16:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Milionia sp.

09.07.2009 15:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Zygaena osterodensis Reiss, 1921.

09.07.2009 14:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Paratalanta hyalinalis, Hübner 1796 (http://ukmoths.org.uk/showzoom.php?id=3644).

09.07.2009 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Graphium aristeus, Stoll 1780 (http://linus.it.uts.edu.au/~don/larvae/papi/arist.html).

09.07.2009 6:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

09.07.2009 5:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Macrothylacia rubi, Linnaeus, 1758.

09.07.2009 5:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Tortrix (Pandemis) heparana, Denis & Schiffermuller 1775 (http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?id=2395).

09.07.2009 5:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ochlodes venata, Bremer & Grey, 1853.

09.07.2009 5:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Nemophora degeerella, Linnaeus, 1758.

09.07.2009 5:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ochlodes venata, Bremer & Grey, 1853.

09.07.2009 5:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lycaena virgaureae Linnaeus, 1758.

09.07.2009 5:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Diacrisia sannio Linnaeus, 1758 (male).

09.07.2009 5:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Laothoe amurensis, Fischer v. Waldheim, 1830.

09.07.2009 5:34, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lomographa bimaculata, Fabricius, 1775.

09.07.2009 5:32, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Macaria alternata, Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775.

08.07.2009 21:08, Nadin Flegontova: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Lycaena virgaureae.

08.07.2009 19:28, Oleg Seliverstov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Lycaena dispar.

08.07.2009 19:25, Oleg Seliverstov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Lycaena dispar.

08.07.2009 19:25, Oleg Seliverstov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Lycaena dispar.

08.07.2009 18:47, Peter Khramov:

The gallery added new photographs have been added to the catalog of taxa. Author: Dean Rogatnykh, Natalia Demchenko, Hope Flegontova, Eugene Glebov, Roman Nenashev Nikolay Kiselev, Oleg Seliverstov, Denis Tumanov, Vasiliy Feoktistov and Sergey Demyanenko.

06.07.2009 21:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Dipleurina lacustrata, Panzer 1804 (http://www.rodeland.de/fotos/lepidoptera/dipleurina_lacustrata.htm).

06.07.2009 21:19, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

http://catocala.narod.ru/las02.html.

06.07.2009 18:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Sergey, you are right, this is Ostrinia palustralis, Hubner 1796 (http://macroid.ru/showphoto.php/photo/4138/size/big/ppuser/3996)/.

06.07.2009 13:25, Sergei Kotov:

That's Ostrinia palustralis.

06.07.2009 11:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.07.2009 23:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

This one is probably Lythria cruentaria female, Hufnagel, 1767 (the species varies much).

05.07.2009 22:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Eumedonia eumedon, Esper 1780 (http://mr-1.ru/PHOTO/BUTTERFLYS/eumedonia_eumedon.htm).

05.07.2009 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

The white form of P. macularia has absolutely different pattern.

05.07.2009 17:53, Sergei Kotov:

This one is of Geometridae, Pseudopanthera macularia.

05.07.2009 17:50, Sergei Kotov:

This moth belongs to Tortricidae family => tribe Olethreutini => and something, don't know.

05.07.2009 17:20, Boris Stradomsky:

Eumedonia eumedon (Esper, 1780)

(= Chiron (Rottemburg, 1780)).
Description. Length of front wing 11-17 mm. In both sexes, the wings are dark brown, the female sometimes with weak orange marginal wells. Bottom wings gray-brown. On the underside of the hind wing veins along the M2 has a narrow white bar (absent in f.fylgia Spangenberg, 1876), between the fourth and fifth spots postdiskalnogo number of white space is missing.
The length of the valve is 2.0-2.2 mm.
Biology. Moist mixed grass meadows. In the mountains up to 3000 m. Years of adults: May-August (depending on locality). Forage plants caterpillars: Geranium spp. Hibernate or caterpillar eggs. Contact with ants Lasius spp, Tapinoma spp.
Subspecies.In the north of the European part of Russia: E. eumedon borealis (Wahlgren, 1930); in the center of European Russia: E. eumedon eumedon (Esper, 1780); Caucasus: E. eumedon modesta (Nekrutenko, 1972).
Related and similar species. P. ripartii: differences in Figure underside of the wings, a different structure of the genitals; A. artaxerxes, A. teberdina: different structure of the valves; species of the genus Polyommatus: upper wings of males of different shades of blue.

05.07.2009 17:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

No objections (also can't approve).

05.07.2009 16:34, Peter Khramov:

Processed recent user comments to photos on the site.

05.07.2009 16:33, Peter Khramov:

Photo leaves "uncertain" for Lythria cruentaria.

05.07.2009 16:31, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved from "uncertain" to Antonechloris smaragdaria.

05.07.2009 16:28, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 16:25, Peter Khramov:

Goes to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 16:25, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 16:13, Peter Khramov:

Undetermined still.

05.07.2009 16:10, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Actias selene.

05.07.2009 15:58, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Lymantria dispar.

05.07.2009 15:56, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Laelia coenosa.

05.07.2009 15:54, Peter Khramov:

Image moved to Spilosoma lutea.

05.07.2009 15:51, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Pyrrhia umbra.

05.07.2009 15:45, Peter Khramov:

Natalia, better to search some species using its short Latin name, e. g. glyphica. Image goes to Euclidia glyphica.

05.07.2009 15:42, Peter Khramov:

To go to Diachrysia chrysitis.

05.07.2009 15:23, Peter Khramov:

Moved from Melanargia galathea to Melanargia halimede.

05.07.2009 15:12, Peter Khramov:

Change status to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 15:10, Peter Khramov:

Ok, moved to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 15:09, Peter Khramov:

Image goes to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 15:08, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 15:07, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 15:07, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

05.07.2009 15:03, Peter Khramov:

Image goes from "undetermined" to Euhampsonia splendida.

05.07.2009 10:57, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Lythria cruentaria, Hufnagel 1767 (http://www.rodeland.de/fotos/lepidoptera/lythria_cruentaria.htm)/.

05.07.2009 10:44, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thetidia (Antonechloris) smaragdaria. Fabricius 1787 (http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/PlagoPulve.htm).

05.07.2009 10:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/PlagoPulve.htm.

05.07.2009 9:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Female (males are smaller and colored bright red).

05.07.2009 9:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/m/macrothylacia_rubi.html.

05.07.2009 9:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

05.07.2009 8:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Spilosoma lutea, Hufnagel 1766 (female): http://mosregbut.narod.ru/spilosoma-lutea.htm.

05.07.2009 7:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Diachrysia chrysitis, Linnaeus, 1758.

05.07.2009 7:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You're right, this one is Euclidia glyphica (reference: www.lepidoptera.pro).

05.07.2009 7:14, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Yes, you're right, this one is Pyrrhia umbra, Hufnagel 1766 (http://webh01.ua.ac.be/vve/Checklists/Lepidoptera/Noctuidae/PumbraX.htm).

05.07.2009 7:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Suggest this can be Melanchra persicariae, Linnaeus 1761 (http://www.biolib.cz/en/image/dir39/id407/).

04.07.2009 13:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Actias selene, Hubner 1807.

03.07.2009 19:46, Denis Tumanov:

Lymantria dispar (Linnaeus, 1758).

03.07.2009 19:44, Denis Tumanov:

Laelia coenosa (Hübner, [1808]).

03.07.2009 19:40, Denis Tumanov:

Spilosoma sp.

03.07.2009 19:38, Denis Tumanov:

Zygaena sp

03.07.2009 18:25, Ilia Ustiantcev: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Pyrrhia umbra.

03.07.2009 10:20, Natalia Demchenko:

Anticlea badiata ? Feeds on roses.

03.07.2009 10:11, Natalia Demchenko:

May be Polyommatus eumedon? Seems to have white stripe...

03.07.2009 10:07, Natalia Demchenko:

Euclidia glyphica. Tried to search for Discestra trifolii, but no way... Yet there are many pictures of Euclidia glyphica there.......:-)

03.07.2009 10:02, Natalia Demchenko:

Plusia chrysitis.

03.07.2009 7:46, Oleg Seliverstov: This species is identified correctly.

Emmelia trabealis.

03.07.2009 2:40, Peter Khramov:

Photographs provided by: Dean Rogatnykh, Natalia Demchenko Boris Stradomsky, Nikolai Vladimirov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Timur Chemerkin, Vladimir Bobrov Oleg Seliverstov, Ilya Ustyantsev, Nikolai Kiselev, Roman Nenashev, Alexander Kolesnikov and Denis Tumanov.

03.07.2009 2:19, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

03.07.2009 2:18, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to "identified successfully".

02.07.2009 13:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

A butterfly was raised from this caterpillar (fed on willow herb).

02.07.2009 10:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/z/zygaena_minos.html).

02.07.2009 0:24, Ivan Stogov: This species is identified correctly.

02.07.2009 0:23, Ivan Stogov: This species is identified correctly.

01.07.2009 13:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www.insektenbox.de/schmet/rotspa.htm).

01.07.2009 13:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

This is Melanargia halimede, Menetries 1859 (http://rusinsects.com/satyrid/s-me-hal.htm).

01.07.2009 12:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www.orion-berlin.de/projekte/schmetter/tag/arten/adippe.htm) Doubt if the ID is correct, white dorsal stripes are absent.

01.07.2009 12:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www.orion-berlin.de/projekte/schmetter/tag/arten/adippe.htm) Doubt if the ID is correct, white dorsal stripes are absent.

01.07.2009 11:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://sungaya.narod.ru/hete/noc/florid.htm).

01.07.2009 11:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/FurcuFurcu.htm).

01.07.2009 11:08, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/FurcuFurcu.htm).

01.07.2009 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/FurcuFurcu.htm).

01.07.2009 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www2.nrm.se/en/svenska_fjarilar/n/nymphalis_xanthomelas.html)

01.07.2009 10:48, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

(http://www.leps.nl/speciesinfo.php?lettercode=SPILLUBR).

01.07.2009 2:29, Peter Khramov:

Shot goes to Limenitis amphyssa.

01.07.2009 2:26, Peter Khramov:

Image goes from Cleora cinctaria to Eupithecia lanceata.

30.06.2009 16:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Rabtala splendida, Oberthur 1880 (http://www.naris.go.kr/v2_en/naris_search/search_result_detail.jsp?inst_id=1293387&lang=EN).

30.06.2009 11:59, Basil Sergienko: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

E.lanceata.

30.06.2009 10:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Yes, you are right, this one is Limenitis amphyssa, Menetries 1859 (http://rusinsects.com/nymph/n-l-amph.htm)/.

30.06.2009 1:58, Peter Khramov:

Thanks to the comments of our members corrected some errors in the pictures on the website.In addition, for better orientation in how to download pictures to a site further highlight key information on the download page of photos and pages with descriptions of species there is an additional link to download the form, allowing not flip through the entire text once again, if you just need to upload a photo.

30.06.2009 1:45, Peter Khramov:

Gentlemen, thanks to all, image goes to Idaea biselata.

29.06.2009 19:18, Vladimir Bobro: This species is identified correctly.

29.06.2009 6:24, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Idaea biselata.

29.06.2009 2:56, Peter Khramov:

And yet - a few new taksonov catalog.

29.06.2009 2:53, Peter Khramov:

As for mess with author names, there was some technical bug, now it works perfectly.

29.06.2009 2:50, Peter Khramov:

Image is moved to Argynnis laodice.

29.06.2009 2:45, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Opsiphanes invirae.

29.06.2009 2:40, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Marpesia harmonia.

29.06.2009 2:27, Peter Khramov:

Photo goes to Damora sagana.

29.06.2009 2:20, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Xanthorhoe biriviata.

29.06.2009 2:13, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Megaspilates mundataria.

29.06.2009 2:07, Peter Khramov:

The image goes from undetermined to Ascotis selenaria ones.

29.06.2009 2:03, Peter Khramov:

Moved from undetermined to Scopula floslactata.

29.06.2009 1:08, Eugene Karolinskiy: There is some mistake about identifying of this species but I'm not sure of the right name of it.

28.06.2009 20:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Scopula floslactata.

28.06.2009 16:52, Peter Khramov:

Authors photos - Flegontova Hope, Dean Rogatnykh Boris Stradomsky Vasily Vladimirov and Nikolai Feoktistov.

28.06.2009 3:12, Peter Khramov:

From Sergey Demyanenko, Ilya Ustyantseva and Viktor Titov.

27.06.2009 23:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Ascotis selenaria Den. et Schiff. (Boarmia selanaria). References: http://www.cnshb.ru/AKDiL/0038/base/k0880003.shtm and this website.

27.06.2009 22:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Megaspilates mundataria, Stoll 1782. (http://www.nature.chita.ru/Insects/Lepidoptera/Geometr/megaspilates_mundataria.htm).

26.06.2009 21:10, Peter Khramov:

Added several new genera and species.

26.06.2009 20:00, Dina Rogatnykh:

Vasily, big thanks!

26.06.2009 18:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You are right, this one is Rabtala splendida (http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=184446).

26.06.2009 18:33, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

You're absolutely right, this one is Xanthorhoe biriviata, Borchausen 1794. (http://ukmoths.org.uk/show.php?bf=1721).

26.06.2009 18:28, Dina Rogatnykh:

I see Rabtala splendida (Oberthür, 1880), but also not fully sure:)

26.06.2009 18:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Yes, right, this is really Argynnis sagana, Doubleday 1847 (http://rusinsects.com/nymph/n-a-saga.htm). Thanks.

26.06.2009 15:22, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Looks like Euthrix potatoria, female (Linnaeus 1758), but not sure of.

26.06.2009 15:14, Timur Chemerkin: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

This is Argynnis sagana.

26.06.2009 15:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Dina, hello. This uploading engine is the very good one (used it more than 100 times), anyway there always can happen some breakdowns. Please, send a mail to the main e-mail address (below on this page). Also it's not a good idea to ask about this in comments. Vasily.

26.06.2009 9:56, Dina Rogatnykh:

No, that's Amurskaya oblast, Russian Far East.

25.06.2009 20:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Marpesia harmonia (http://www.entowinkler.at/jalbum_13/slides/Marpesia%20harmonia%201oben%20a%20HW.html).

25.06.2009 19:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Opsiphanes invirae amplificatus, Stichel 1904: http://www.mundobutterfly.com.ar/Html/Invirae.html (layout is different though).

25.06.2009 19:47, Peter Khramov:

Ilya, if you mean that it is not in the directory - top right there is a link to download the photos of those species are not found in the database of the site. If there is a mind that is not hvataaet any photos that you upload - otpishite details in the mail, and that when it was downloaded, what is not in your personal account.

25.06.2009 17:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Argynnis laodice (used this website as a reference).

25.06.2009 15:12, Basil Sergienko: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

This one is also H.punctinalis.

25.06.2009 15:11, Basil Sergienko: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

This is H.punctinalis.

25.06.2009 14:39, Ilia Ustiantcev:

Where Eversmannia exornata?

25.06.2009 13:49, Ilia Ustiantcev:

Looks like Aspilates mundataria.

25.06.2009 13:45, Ilia Ustiantcev: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

This can be Ascotis selenaria if the image was shot somewhere in European Russia. (By the way, can it be, somehow, Moscow region?)

25.06.2009 13:38, Dina Rogatnykh:

Can't dig what's going on with photos uploading? These ones are mine, uploaded them yesterday. Why there is another author's name??? The day before I uploaded these to http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/rogatnykh/view/187497/?page=4, that's the very proof! If this website works in such a wrong way, I'll never add there my photos anymore!

25.06.2009 13:13, Peter Khramov:

The gallery uploaded new photos, including many previously unillustrated online forms. For pictures thank Dean Rogatnykh, Boris Stradomsky, Viktor Titov and Ilya Ustyantseva. Preview the new photos:

25.06.2009 11:45, Basil Sergienko: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

3076 is X.biriviata.

25.06.2009 11:27, Basil Sergienko: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

1909 image is I.biselata.

25.06.2009 11:18, Basil Sergienko:

1778 photo is E.lanceata.

25.06.2009 10:55, Basil Sergienko:

Photos #1955 and 1956 belong to H.punctinalis.

23.06.2009 21:31, Boris Stradomsky:

Plebeius (Plebejides) pylaon (Fischer de Waldheim, 1832), male.

23.06.2009 21:31, Boris Stradomsky:

Plebeius (Plebejides) pylaon (Fischer de Waldheim, 1832), male.

23.06.2009 21:30, Boris Stradomsky:

Plebeius (Plebejides) pylaon (Fischer de Waldheim, 1832), female.

23.06.2009 21:18, Peter Khramov:

In the catalog there was a couple of new taxa on the page of each photograph - information about the field / stage of development, as well as mark, if the form is not defined precisely. In the Photo Gallery - New pictures of Hope Flegontova, Vladimir Schaefer, Boris Stradomsky and Ilya Ustyantseva.

23.06.2009 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Battus madyes.

23.06.2009 20:04, Peter Khramov:

Moved to Battus madyes.

23.06.2009 0:38, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

23.06.2009 0:38, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

Yes, this one is Phragmataecia castaneae.

23.06.2009 0:36, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

23.06.2009 0:35, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

Absolutely approve!

23.06.2009 0:34, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

23.06.2009 0:33, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

Well, it's nearly impossible to make mistake identifying this one..)).. Yes, that's for sure Parasemia plantaginis.

23.06.2009 0:32, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

Approve, that's Calospilos sylvata.

23.06.2009 0:30, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

Yes, this one is Maculinea arion, male.

23.06.2009 0:29, Alexander Poteyko: This species is identified correctly.

Yeah-yeah, right.

21.06.2009 17:31, Peter Khramov:

From Sergei Novitsky, Vasily and Andrey Feoktistov Sazykina.

17.06.2009 22:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Battus madyes.

17.06.2009 22:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Battus madies.

17.06.2009 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Namely:

14.06.2009 23:24, Peter Khramov:

Available in page author ...

14.06.2009 23:01, Peter Khramov:

Andrey Sazykin, Vasiliy Feoktistov and Igor Rokachevsky provided new images. Accordingly, some new taxa in the database of the site.

14.06.2009 15:18, Peter Khramov:

;--)

13.06.2009 22:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Just uploaded the newer photo of this species, female. Got 1 year ago in South China, already published.

13.06.2009 21:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Thank you Peter for something that removes spam from the guest.

11.06.2009 0:32, Peter Khramov:

Implemented by the authors are available refinement is not defined and not well-defined images, new types of satyrs.

11.06.2009 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Goes from "undetermined" to "identified successfully", Ninguta schrenkii.

11.06.2009 0:30, Peter Khramov:

Moved from "undetermined" to "identified successfully", Ninguta schrencki.

11.06.2009 0:29, Peter Khramov:

Ok then, photo moved from "undetermined" to "identified successfully" Ninguta schrencki).

11.06.2009 0:29, Peter Khramov:

Goes from "undetermined" to "identified successfully" (Ninguta schrencki).

11.06.2009 0:03, Peter Khramov:

Photo moved to "identified successfully".

11.06.2009 0:00, Peter Khramov:

Moved to "identified successfully".

10.06.2009 23:59, Peter Khramov:

Goes to Dichrorampha sequana but with status "uncertain species".

09.06.2009 20:21, Peter Khramov:

From Basil Feoktistov, Vladimir Bobrov and Denis Tumanov.

09.06.2009 17:25, Peter Khramov:

Now, in a specific field can be specified to identify the object in the picture - a subspecies, shape, age larvae and things like that.

08.06.2009 13:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Lethe marginalis Motschulsky, 1860.

08.06.2009 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Lethe marginalis, Motschulsky, 1860.

07.06.2009 16:05, Peter Khramov:

If the guest review says an authorized user, the name of the author inserted automatically (no need to enter it), appears in the list of comments appropriate label "authorized".

07.06.2009 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Successfully (http://rusinsects.com/satyr.htm)!

07.06.2009 11:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Successfully for sure (http://rusinsects.com/satyr.htm).

07.06.2009 11:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Approve (http://rusinsects.com/satyr.htm).

07.06.2009 11:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov: This species is identified correctly.

Successfully (http://rusinsects.com/satyr.htm).

07.06.2009 2:03, Peter Khramov:

Now for some photos further information is available from one site, there is evidence that in the kind of photograph. For the majority of pictures by the author determine the type of default is considered the author of photos.

07.06.2009 0:50, Peter Khramov:

Now on the page with a description of butterflies do not need to click on an extra link to see all kinds of pictures.

07.06.2009 0:12, Peter Khramov:

Pictures provided Vasiliy Feoktistov Sergey Novitsky, Andrey Sazykin and Igor Rokachevsky.

03.06.2009 17:17, Vlad Proklov: There is some mistake about identifying of this species, I know the right name of it.

Dichrorampha ?sequana.

03.06.2009 17:15, Vlad Proklov: This species is identified correctly.

03.06.2009 0:53, Peter Khramov:

Now, any registered user can use the special form located on each page with a description of a butterfly, upload your corrections and additions. In addition, there is a description of each page of the list of species of the same genus as the reporting (right column).

31.05.2009 16:20, Peter Khramov:

From Basil Feoktistov, Boris and George Eugene Komarov.

31.05.2009 16:02, Peter Khramov:

Fixed an issue that arose for some new options entered passwords.

28.05.2009 20:35, Denis Tumanov:

Next to last age caterpillar. In Penza region it feeds on hag-weed.

28.05.2009 20:32, Denis Tumanov:

Neope niphonica, Butler 1881.

28.05.2009 20:32, Denis Tumanov:

Neope niphonica, Butler 1881.

28.05.2009 20:01, Denis Tumanov:

Ninguta schrencki (Menetries, 1859).

28.05.2009 19:58, Denis Tumanov: This species is identified correctly.

28.05.2009 19:56, Denis Tumanov:

Ninguta schrencki (Menetries, 1859).

27.05.2009 14:40, Peter Khramov:

Pictures provided Vasiliy Feoktistov, Denis Tumanov Evgeny Komarov and Vladimir Shefer.

26.05.2009 11:42, Peter Khramov:

Looking forward...

26.05.2009 11:38, Peter Khramov:

Doubt about the sun but in some glass box in a room probably yes, for decades... Waiting for a better one.

25.05.2009 23:44, Peter Khramov:

New Options, now on the settings page you can change your password to a more convenient and safer.

25.05.2009 21:33, Denis Tumanov:

Huh, that's being exposed to the sun for decades? )))) The nearest days will upload a good photo of this one.

25.05.2009 21:04, Denis Tumanov:

These are 2nd brood caterpillars.

25.05.2009 21:03, Denis Tumanov:

This caterpillar is of the fourth brood.

25.05.2009 21:01, Denis Tumanov:

Second generation caterpillar.

25.05.2009 21:00, Denis Tumanov:

These caterpillars are of the first brood.

25.05.2009 20:58, Denis Tumanov:

Found out this caterpillar on a bird cherry. Can identify it clearly in one month, using imago.

25.05.2009 19:48, Peter Khramov:

Authors shots - Sergey Novitsky, Dennis Vasily Tumanov and Feoktistov.

25.05.2009 18:50, Peter Khramov:

Registered users and authors can comment on any photograph, as well as to confirm or refute the accuracy of the determination of the form in the photos. We draw the attention of specialists, in the gallery, you can separately display images, on which kind of undefined or is not defined precisely , these are the pictures require your attention in the first place ...

24.05.2009 2:48, Peter Khramov:

The newly registering users and authors can post information about their city in a separate field. There is an opinion that such information can help, for example, to meet offline. In addition, the base site, new taxa, and the gallery - photos Basil Feoktistov.

24.05.2009 2:33, Peter Khramov:

With the new filter in the gallery, you can select only the pictures, the kind on which the butterflies accurately determined not accurately or not defined at all. If you can tell the species name to "undetermined" photos, write us to e-mail. In the near future, this information could be made available through a system of comments to the photos on the site.

23.05.2009 0:11, Peter Khramov:

Basil, not for that. Regarding the filter on the degree of determination of the type answered the mail. In short: the filter is ready.

22.05.2009 22:36, Peter Khramov:

Added a few exotic and not only taxa, as well as pictures of butterflies from Svetlana Lukienko, Basil and Peter Feoktistov Khramov.

22.05.2009 19:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Peter, thank you for a new form. P.S. Already I downloaded it for 3 photos.

22.05.2009 15:01, Peter Khramov:

Now, on the site you can not only upload photos butterfly species that exist in the base site (catalog), but also photos of species that are in the database yet, and the photo, view the butterfly which is not defined. All three types of downloads available from Dashboard registered users.

21.05.2009 18:03, Peter Khramov:

Downloading a photo of a butterfly on a website, you can now specify that the form of the butterfly in the photo is determined accurately. In this case, other users on the site will pay more attention to the photo and will confirm or oprovergut information form.

21.05.2009 15:47, Peter Khramov:

Basil, now such photos can not be downloaded, except by mail send. But this, of course, uncomfortable and wrong, and therefore in the process of finalizing the components of a site that will download photos butterfly species which are not yet in the database of the site, as well as photos of butterflies, the exact form of which the photographer generally unknown (ie not defined) .Today or tomorrow everything should be ready.

21.05.2009 12:37, Vasiliy Feoktistov:

Good afternoon. I have a question for you. I have photos of butterflies that are not described on the website, including tropical species. How can I load them for publication?

20.05.2009 23:13, Peter Khramov:

Now, in the gallery, you can select photos Lepidoptera.ru of taxa, for example, it is possible to see only pictures of butterflies family Papilionidae , or just kind of Parnassius . During Code Update gallery 2 hours was deactivated function to download new images. Now downloading again fully operational.

20.05.2009 18:12, Peter Khramov:

Authors shots - Vasiliy Feoktistov and Andrey Sazykin.

18.05.2009 15:25, Peter Khramov:

Preview of new images:

15.05.2009 19:42, Peter Khramov:

Thank you all for the comments.

15.05.2009 0:22, Peter Khramov:

For a more comfortable site reviewed by foreign authors are beginning to spread some of the pages in English. To begin with - to start.

13.05.2009 23:41, Peter Khramov:

13.05.2009 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Starting May 13, all the news about the publication of new images instead of text links will be displayed in the photo preview image links.

13.05.2009 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Below - preview pictures.

07.05.2009 14:23, Peter Khramov:

Eugene and Vladimir supplemented collection of images Inachis io , Zegris eupheme , Euchloe ausonia , Macdunnoughia confusa and Proterebia afra .

04.05.2009 13:25, Peter Khramov:

Sergei briefly replied to the forum tomorrow you accomplish your goal even more.

03.05.2009 23:02, Bahurin Serge:

I suggest to improve the design of the site. Ready to help in the free (to draw the necessary elements to choose the color scheme)

01.05.2009 22:56, Peter Khramov:

If you have any feedback, comments, and other cries of the soul - they are happy to be heard (and, if necessary, and commented) in guest book .

26.04.2009 18:45, Peter Khramov:

Photo unseasoned exotics, including the pupal stage. Links to the updated types:


Archaeoprepona demophon
Graphium agamemnon
Morpho peleides
Papilio memnon
Papilio rumnzovia
Papilio thoas
Parthenos sylvia
ornithopter Elena (Troides helena)

23.04.2009 20:11, Peter Khramov:

Continue to spread the dried butterflies ...

Links to the updated page views: Attacus atlas Danaus plexippus Delias eucharis Dismorphia amphione Doxocopa laurentia Dryas iulia < / a> Eueides aliphera Eueides isabella Helicunius telesiphe Hyles euphorbiae (Hyles euphorbiae) Limenitis arthemis Mechanitis lysimnia Morpho didius < li> Morpho epistrophus Morpho helenor Morpho peleides Papilio anchisiades Papilio androgeus Papilio memnon < a href = "/ species / precis-octavia /"> Precis octavia Prioneris sita Prioneris thestylis Troides priamus

19.04.2009 14:31, Peter Khramov:

Now, sort photos in the gallery is possible not only by the time of publication, but also the title of a butterfly.

16.04.2009 23:01, Peter Khramov:

The database site added new species to the gallery - 60 new photos from Sergei Novitsky, Tumanov and Peter Denis Khramov.
Links to the updated page views: Hyles Totenkopf (Acherontia atropos) Adela croesella
Amphipyra berbera Perelivnitsa Schrenk (Apatura schrenckii) Cameraria ohridella Cauchas rufifrontella Chazara bischoffi Colias aurorina zheltushka saffron (Colias croceus) < a href = "/ species / colias-draconis /"> Colias draconis Colias eogene Colias hyperborea zheltushka rakitnikovaya (Colias myrmidone) Colias staudingeri Colias wiskotti < em> Hipparchia parisatis
Hyles euphorbiae (Hyles euphorbiae) Issoria eugenia lasiocampidae clover (Lasiocampa trifolii) Lemonia dumi Maculinea arionides Morpho catenarius Morpho hecuba Morpho portis Neozephyrus aurorinus Neozephyrus japonicus Papilio dardanus Papilio demoleus Papilio euchenor Papilio fuscus Papilio glaucus Papilio helenus Hvostonosets Maak (Papilio maacki) Papilio palinurus < a href = "/ species / papilio-victorinus /"> Papilio victorinus Parnassius ariadne Parnassius autocrator Parnassius boedromius Parnassius charltonius Parnassius delphius Parnassius eversmanni Parnassius felderi Parnassius honrathi Mnemosyne (Parnassius mnemosyne) Parnassius nordmanni Parnassius patricius < / em> Parnassius tenedius Plebeius argyrognomon Greenish copper-butterfly (Polyommatus damon) Polyommatus daphnis Rhizedra lutosa Rhizedra lutosa Troides hypolitus Belyanka eyfema (Zegris eupheme)

11.04.2009 2:33, Peter Khramov:

Authors photos - Denis Tumanov Sergey Novitskiy and Vladimir Shaver.

Links to the updated page views: Aporodes floralis Archon apollinus < / a> plusiinae gamma (Autographa gamma) Chrysocrambus craterella lasiocampidae fluffy (Eriogaster lanestris) Evergestis extimalis Evergestis forficalis Evergestis frumentalis Evergestis politalis lasiocampidae clover (Lasiocampa trifolii) Lemonia dumi Chervonets unpaired (Lycaena dispar) hummingbird hawk-moth (Macroglossum stellatarum) Scoop big zheltokrylaya (Noctua pronuba) < li> Scoparia subfusca Thisanotia chrysonuchella < / li> Witlesia pallida

09.04.2009 3:45, Peter Khramov:

Photo - Yevgeny Komarov, Sergey Novitsky and Denis Tumanov.
Links to the updated types: Agrotis crassa Agrotis exclamationis < / a> Colocasia coryli Colocasia coryli Euxoa nigricans Lacanobia oleracea Marumba quercus Melitaea aurelia Melitaea aurelia < a href = "/ species / mythimna-albipuncta /"> Scoop striped belopyatnistaya (Mythimna albipuncta) Scoop el-white (Mythimna l-album) Mythimna obsoleta Platyperigea kadenii Scoop-hypocrite (Rhyacia simulans) Schinia scutosa Hyles mottled (Smerinthus ocellata) Hyles mottled (Smerinthus ocellata) Hyles mottled (Smerinthus ocellata) Yigoga signifera Zygaena carniolica

31.03.2009 1:40, Peter Khramov:

Photo Denis Tumanov and Yevgeny Komarov,Dmitry and Alexander Shpaneva Pozhogin

Links to the updated page views: Emmelia trabealis lasiocampidae fluffy < em> (Eriogaster lanestris)
lasiocampidae clover (Lasiocampa trifolii) lasiocampidae clover (Lasiocampa trifolii) lasiocampidae clover (Lasiocampa trifolii) lasiocampidae clover (Lasiocampa trifolii) Chervonets spotted (Lycaena phlaeas) Silkworm unpaired (Lymantria dispar) cabbage moth (Plutella xylostella) Pseudeustrotia candidula Ypthima asterope

29.03.2009 22:29, Peter Khramov:

Last night, in some cases, when moving between pages in the gallery could cause errors. Now there is no.

29.03.2009 8:41, Peter Khramov:

Now you can select a photo gallery of butterflies photo by the author (photographer) and the stage of development depicted in the photo butterfly. Furthermore, there is a choice of the number of images displayed on a page. Thus, for example, it becomes possible selection of this kind: caterpillar shot Vlad Proklova, with the withdrawal of 25 images per page .

27.03.2009 22:10, Peter Khramov:

Links to the updated types:

Lentochnitsa red (Catocala nupta)
lasiocampidae oak (Lasiocampa quercus)
Silkworm oakleaf (Gastropacha quercifolia)
Lemonia taraxaci
Arctia tigrina
Watsonarctia casta
Hives (Aglais urticae)

25.03.2009 21:02, Peter Khramov:

Links to the updated types:

Aglossa pinguinalis
Agonopterix alstromeriana
Ceratuncus danubiella
Tupokrylka White (Cilix glaucata)
Clepsis pallidana
Cydia compositella
Cydia internana
Female shuttle willow (Earias clorana)
Earias vernana
Earias vernana
Epicallima formosella
Nyctegretis lineana
Nyctegretis lineana
Black Bear (Phragmatobia luctifera)
Pleurota aristella
Pseudargyrotoza conwagana
Pyroderces argyrogrammos
Synaphe moldavica

23.03.2009 0:38, Peter Khramov:

Authors of new photos - Dmitry Pozhogin Denis Tumanov Andrey Sazykin, Evgeny Komarov and Sergey Didenko.


Agriopis marginaria
moth-moth poplar (Biston strataria)
Brachionycha nubeculosa
Chiasmia clathrata
Conistra rubiginea
Cynaeda dentalis
checkered avriniya (Euphydryas aurinia)
Ognyevka nettle (Eurrhypara hortulata)
satyrinae buharnikovaya (Hipparchia fagi)
Hypomecis roboraria
Lasiocampidae oak (Lasiocampa quercus)
Lemonia taraxaci
Lithostege griseata
Megaspilates mundataria
Melanargia ines
Melanargia lachesis
Narraga tessularia
NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA (Nymphalis antiopa)
black moth (Odezia atrata)
Orthosia cerasi
Scoop early brown-gray (Orthosia gothica)
Orthosia populeti
Pine Scoop (Panolis flammea)
Mnemosyne (Parnassius mnemosyne)
Pseudoterpna pruinata
Rhodostrophia vibicaria
moth decorated with (Scopula ornata)
Siona lineata
Synaphe antennalis
Trichopteryx carpinata
Trichopteryx polycommata

21.03.2009 16:30, Peter Khramov:

Updated gallery types:
Aedophron rhodites
Bear Hebe (Arctia festiva)
Bear village (Arctia villica)
Calamia tridens
Bear-beggar (Diaphora mendica)
Bear brown-yellow (Hyphoraia aulica)
Bear brown-yellow (Hyphoraia aulica)
Lycaena thersamon
Lishaynitsa pink (Miltochrista miniata)
Copper-butterfly Argus (Plebeius argus)
Proterebia afra

21.03.2009 14:11, Peter Khramov:

New pictures for the following:
Perlamutrovka most (Argynnis paphia)
Catocala neonympha
Small red ribbon (Catocala promissa)
Chrysoestia sexguttella
Costaconvexa polygrammata
Euchloe ausonia
checkered maturna (Euphydryas maturna)
Godonella aestimaria
Heliomata glarearia
Lithostege griseata
Krupnoglazka (Lopinga achine)
Silkworm unpaired (Lymantria dispar)
Melanargia russiae
Narraga tessularia
Uglokrylnitsa With white (Polygonia c-album)
Bear Purple (Rhyparia purpurata)
small night peacock (Saturnia pavonia)
Saturnia spini
Tephrina arenacearia
Tephrina murinaria
Zephyr birch (Thecla betulae)
Belyanka eyfema (Zegris eupheme)
Polixena (Zerynthia polyxena)

19.03.2009 12:02, Peter Khramov:

Today published new pictures.Links to the updated page with descriptions of species:
Lzhepestryanka common (Amata phegea)
Apocheima pilosaria
Bear village (Arctia villica)
Carterocephalus silvicola
Chamaesphecia astatiformis
Podalirius (Iphiclides podalirius)
Muschampia tessellum
copper-butterfly rimn (Neolycaena rhymnus)
winter moth (Operophtera brumata)
Copper-butterfly silver (Polyommatus coridon)
Big night peacock (Saturnia pyri)
Synanthedon tipuliformis
Scoop lebedovaya (Trachea atriplicis)
zygaenidae volatile (Zygaena ephialtes)
Zygaena sedi

17.03.2009 1:34, Peter Khramov:

Gallery Lepidoptera.ru enlarged photos Eugene Komarov and Boris Loboda, Sergei Novitsky Igor Didenko and Sergey Rokachevskogo:

Apocheima pilosaria
Apocheima hispidaria
Cucullia artemisiae
Silkworm oakleaf
Eugnosta magnificana
Eye Flower
Pestrokrylnitsa volatile
Silkworm plum
cabbage
common blue
Parahypopta caestrum
Eupsilia transversa
Lucyna
Drasteria cailino
Admiral

15.03.2009 12:30, Peter Khramov:

On the site the opportunity to self-loading photos and drawings of butterflies authors to track the status of uploaded images. The authors have already published their photos on the site are sent passwords. New users can create it , then they have an opportunity to self-uploading photos to the site. At the moment, you can upload the pictures only those species of butterfly that is in the database of the site.To upload a photo, you need to go to a page with a description of the butterfly shown in the photo, and use the form at the bottom of each of these pages. Finding the right kind of butterfly may be using the каталогом , search (including and synonyms) or simply by typing in your browser http: // lepidoptera.ru / species / aglais-urticae / (where aglais-urticae - the name of your desired type).
The system is in test mode. Of all the bugs and problems is not clear in the request to write to the post office.

10.03.2009 15:11, Peter Khramov:

Change the format of the issuance of the news. Now, by default, each piece of news is issued on a separate page and not as part of a list of all the news for that date. Accordingly, changed addresses news.

07.02.2009 22:41, Peter Khramov:

Nymphalis antiopa - additions to the description NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA.
Nymphalis polychloros - and large tortoiseshell.
Colias croceus - and post horn.
Nymphalis xanthomelas - and a new description of a black and yellow Vanessa.

03.02.2009 17:50, Peter Khramov:

Sergei Novitsky, Maxim Schwartz and Vladimir Schaefer provided replenishment photo galleries photos of the following types of butterflies:
Idaea degeneraria
Idaea ochrata
Idaea politaria
Idaea rufaria
Idaea seriata
Scopula flaccidaria
Heather moth (Scopula immorata)
Scopula marginepunctata
Perlamutrovka pandora (Argynnis pandora)
Hyles convolvulaceae (Agrius convolvuli)
Apollo (Parnassius apollo)
Swallowtail (Papilio machaon) .

13.01.2009 12:50, Peter Khramov:

NEW:
Photo Prodotis stolida
Photo Dysgonia algira
Photo Drasteria caucasica

12.01.2009 22:04, Peter Khramov:

Adding to the ranks of admirals , green-veined white , NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA and Diachrysia chrysitis .

11.01.2009 1:15, Peter Khramov:

Authors - Sergei Novitsky (pictures Aegle kaekeritziana , Elaphria venustula , Deltote bankiana , Tarachidia candefacta , Tarachidia candefacta , Mycteroplus puniceago and Eublemma amoena ) and Andrey Sazykin ( day photo Peacock , including in the caterpillar stage and pupa , picture imago and swallowtail caterpillars , large perlamutrovki , including temnuyu form , photos Palemon and траураницы ).

28.12.2008 1:03, Peter Khramov:

After that, the number of species of butterflies illustrated on the site has exceeded six hundred, and the total number of photos in the gallery approached fifteen hundred.
Separately picturesque disorder select species for which descriptions of new images are used as illustrations:


Zerintiya Spanish
Zerynthia cerisy
copper-butterfly Orion
Satyrium spini
Satyrium acaciae
Satyrium pruni
Pseudophilotes baton
Polyommatus thersites
Polyommatus dorylas
Polyommatus daphnis
Polyommatus hispana
copper-butterfly bean
greenish copper-butterfly
Polygonia egea
Plebeius orbitulus
Plebeius argyrognomon
Plebeius optilete
Parnassius phoebus
Apollo
Papilio alexanor
large tortoiseshell
Melitaea parthenoides
Melitaea britomartis
checkered southern

Nigella Cato
Danaus Chrysippus
zheltushka torfyannikovaya
Colias australis
Sennitsa Gero
Sennitsa glitserion
Coenonympha gardetta
Sennitsa Arkania
Perlamutrovka evfrosina
Boloria thore
Brizeida
Boloria napaea
Archon apollinus
Perelivnitsa poplar
Anthocharis euphenoides

Melanargia occitanica
Maculinea nausithous
scarce copper
Chervonets chernopyatnisty
Chervonets spotted
Chervonets sorrel
Chervonets bluish
Chervonets purple
Krupnoglazka
Vixen
velvet
Kirinia roxelana
Hipparchia statilinus
Hipparchia fatua
Hipparchia aristaeus
Lucyna
Euchloe crameri
Nigella Tindaro
Nigella Fartagh
Lapland satyr
Nigella jellyfish
Gorga
Euryale
Nigella Erief
Erebia cassioides

24.12.2008 23:44, Peter Khramov:

With the help of drawings Andrew illustrated a further 12 species of butterflies on our website:


Pyrgus serratulae
Pyrgus alveus
speckled hen Sappho
Oeneis tarpeia
speckled hen tavolgovaya
Muschampia tessellum
Maculinea teleius
Maculinea alcon
Sennitsa Gero
Sennitsa Arkania
Carcharodus alceae
Maculinea nausithous

23.12.2008 2:39, Peter Khramov:

This time, the author pictures - Simon Coombes. His photo - dozens of species of butterflies, including

Perlamutrovka Niobe
Glaucopsyche paphos
Lycaena thersamon
Gonepteryx cleopatra
Belyanka mountain
Cupido alcetas
NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA
Euchloe ausonia
Satyrium esculi
Vanessa indica
Leptotes pirithous
greenish peat zheltushka
Pieris cheiranthi
Melitaea deione
Tomares ballus
Lentochnik Camilla ...

21.12.2008 20:21, Peter Khramov:

Several dozen pictures of Vlad Proklova. Among them are pictures Tinagma ocnerostomella , Phyllonorycter comparella , Nycteola revayana < / em> , Macrothylacia rubi , Marasmarcha lunaedactyla , < em> Goniodoma limoniella , Plebeius idas , Lycaena virgaureae , Prays fraxinella , Ypsolopha nemorella , Ypsolopha vittella , Cydia splendana , Coleophora wockeella , Colias myrmidone , Eilema griseola , Eucosma cana , < a href = "http://lepidoptera.ru/species/opisthograptis-luteolata/"> Opisthograptis luteolata , Pempelia palumbella , Clostera pigra < / a>, Alucita hexadactyla , Laothoe populi , Nola cucullatella , Cyclophora punctaria , Cerura vinula , Agapeta hamana and other species of butterflies.

18.12.2008 22:39, Peter Khramov:

New photos of butterflies in our gallery .

18.12.2008 20:50, Peter Khramov:

Enjoy the gallery and the catalog partition with the list of species for which there is a description of the illustration was a little more comfortable.

18.12.2008 17:32, Peter Khramov:

Added 78 photos, including photos Adscita albanica and Zerynthia polyxena , Lasiommata petropolitana and Maculinea arion , Anthocharis cardamines and Brintesia circe , Glaucopsyche alexis < / a>, Rhyparia purpurata , Arethusana arethusa and Proterebia afra , Argynnis pandora , Melitaea diamina , Minois dryas and Satyrus ferula .

15.12.2008 22:50, Peter Khramov:

New photos of the following butterfly species:

Neozephyrus quercus - Zephyr oak
Thecla betulae - Zephyr birch
Trachea atriplicis - Scoop lebedovaya
Hamearis lucina - Lucyna
Macroglossum stellatarum - hummingbird hawk-moth
Lymantria dispar - Silkworm unpaired
Plebeius argyrognomon
Libythea celtis - Nosatka leaf-
Pyrgus carthami
Erebia aethiops - Ethiopian
Cucullia umbratica - Kapyushonnitsa gray
Cerura vinula - Harpy large
Agrotis crassa
Polyommatus daphnis
Orbona fragariae
Diachrysia chrysitis
Autographa gamma - plusiinae gamma

14.12.2008 2:05, Peter Khramov:

Additives to Sennitsy Arcania and Sennitsy Pamphylia .

09.12.2008 23:01, Peter Khramov:

Deposit / addition:


Tolstogolovka blackish
Green Hairstreak
Nosatka leaf-

02.12.2008 0:13, Peter Khramov:

Once a bear and two bear . Both - Kaya.

09.11.2008 16:16, Peter Khramov:

Treatment of minor glitches within descriptions butterflies kind of Oligia .

02.11.2008 0:30, Peter Khramov:

A bit of new data
tolstogolovki dash ,
tolstogolovki point ,
copper-butterfly rimn ,
theclinae Vyazovaya ,
ornithopters and Helena
zheltushki saffron.

08.10.2008 23:50, Peter Khramov:

Adding to the gallery butterflies : two shots Lycaena dispar , one - Carterocephalus silvicola and Thymelicus lineola .

04.10.2008 19:10, Peter Khramov:

Lined microdescriptions the following types:


Scoop pine
Scoop plevelnaya belopolosaya
Scoop turf
Hadena bicruris
Scoop clove seed
Hadena rivularis
dull gray moth garden
Scoop clover
Scoop shirokospinnaya alder
Cerastis leucographa
moth reddish spring
Scoop herbal
Scoop cabbage
Scoop kaluzhnitsevaya
Scoop plantaginaceae
Scoop blueberry
Scoop big greenish
Scoop secretive
Scoop early brown-gray
Scoop early reddish
Scoop early purple-gray
Scoop early dark gray
Scoop porphyry
Scoop dark brown

03.10.2008 20:00, Peter Khramov:

The next regular scoop description:

Scoop earthen limbic
Scoop rough
Scoop el-white
Scoop striped pale
Mythimna unipuncta
Scoop striped belopyatnistaya
Scoop striped yellow-brown
Scoop belokraynyaya
Scoop Wheat
Euxoa aquilina
Scoop chernopyatnistaya
Euxoa recussa
Scoop lebedovaya
Rusina ferruginea
Scoop grim
Scoop poplar Razorscale
Scoop kozloborodnikovaya
Calamia tridens
Scoop raspberry
Xylena exsoleta
Scoop whitetip large
Scoop luxury
Scoop agate

02.10.2008 23:00, Peter Khramov:

The new party old women:

Actinotia polyodon - Scoop brown mammal
Cosmia pyralina - Scoop brown Elm
Cosmia trapezina - Scoop yellowish Elm
Enargia paleacea - Scoop pale hardwood
Oligia latruncula
Oligia versicolor

01.10.2008 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Adding to the descriptions of the scoop:


Scoop light Burano cereal
Apamea sordens
Apamea crenata
Scoop large field
Scoop golden plantaginaceae
Paradrina clavipalpis
Scoop lilac spring
Amphipoea fucosa
Scoop Tillage
Scoop hawthorn kisteusaya
Scoop crustal wading
Scoop crustal Tenaya gray

30.09.2008 22:50, Peter Khramov:

New information for dozens of species:

Scoop biryuchnaya
Female shuttle willow
Earias vernana
plusiinae gamma
Autographa pulchrina
plusiinae iota
plusiinae gilded
winter moth
Archiearis notha
Vesennitsa ordinary
Scoop crustal yellow-brown
Hoplodrina octogenaria
Scoop ground light gray
Scoop ground brownish-gray
Scoop Sphinx
Kapyushonnitsa Asteraceae
Kapyushonnitsa gray
Kapyushonnitsa wormwood
Kapyushonnitsa eastern
Eupsilia transversa
Conistra rubiginosa
Scoop blueberry ploskotelaya
Agrochola macilenta
Agrochola lota
Scoop dark brown legged
Scoop puhonogaya yellow-red
Agrochola circellaris
Strelchatka spotted
Scoop succinic
Scoop yaskolkovaya
Scoop stalnikovaya foreheaded
Sinegolovka
Scoop temnokraynyaya earthen
Strelchatka maple
Стрельчатка-зайчик

29.09.2008 23:55, Peter Khramov:

Two dozen new definitions ...

Scoop pistachio
Scoop mi
Scoop Greater South
Scoop Serpokrylov
Scoop galloway
Scoop red-green
Scoop zubchatokrylaya
Scoop gray Goroshkova
basket-mouths dlinnoschupikovaya
Scoop willow
moth trapping
black moths
moths contrast
Larentsiya ordinary
moth thyme
moth decorated
moths Heather
moth small half-hearted
moth flower belotochechnaya
Mole spring beech

28.09.2008 23:45, Peter Khramov:

It added about forty new miniopisany butterflies, mostly mikrocheshuekrylyh and moths:

gooseberry moth
moth motley celastraceae
moths birch
Epione repandaria
moths limbic blueberry

moth planed
moths hawthorn
moths lunchataya chetyrehpolosaya
moths angular alder
moths angular birch
moths angular ash
stripped light gray
moth plum
Krylohvostka elderberry
moths puhonogaya yellow
pine moth
moth-moth poplar
moth hairy moth-
silkworm moth-striped
pearl moth
moth spotted edged
pale grayish moth
Pedyanitsa pale white
moths bordered
Hemistola chrysoprasaria
Hemithea aestivaria
zheltushka saffron
large green moth
moths obtuse green
bird cherry ermine moth

Travyanka dusky
Ognyevka nettle
a large wax moth
Ognyevka reed the proboscis
codling moth
Cnephasia chrysantheana
listovertkoy colorful fruit
pterophoridae plum
Nemophora metallica
Dlinnouska belted
grape leaf roller

18.09.2008 19:44, Peter Khramov:

The gallery - photo poplar lentochnika , descriptions - blue sash and Rheumaptera undulata .

17.09.2008 21:10, Peter Khramov:

First travyanka: Titanio normalis . Second travyanka: Evergestis desertalis .

31.08.2008 4:31, Peter Khramov:

Reloading images that were not already because of the bug that was just fixed a. Now Gallery 1000 photo butterflies .

09.08.2008 2:20, Peter Khramov:

According to the results of testing of the new system it is covered for completion: -)

07.08.2008 23:46, Peter Khramov:

Beginning August 7 registered users can ship pictures without having to enter each time your data. It's enough to enter the site under your name and password before downloading photo.Those who have not yet registered on the site, are automatically placed in the authors after loading the first photo, and in the case of approval of the administrator, will receive a letter with a password to login. As of the evening of August 7, 2008 is the only system improvement uploading photos.

04.08.2008 9:30, Peter Khramov:

Start of self-loading photo postponed to August 7. Then nachinet job section "Communication".

26.07.2008 21:05, Peter Khramov:

Taki has earned test version gallery butterflies , where you can view all the images that are available now online. The trial version contains a number of limitations, such as the photo shows is not accessible to the maximum size and can not choose the number of preview of the page. These features will be added in the next version.

25.07.2008 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Skip to main search added another option - site search lepidoptera.ru using engine Yandex, which takes into account the specified indexed search engine page.

24.07.2008 21:15, Peter Khramov:

There is the last of the images sent via the old system.

18.07.2008 1:00, Peter Khramov:

In connection with work on the automation of the publication of pictures of Lepidoptera on our site is temporarily disabled the ability to publish the old way. All images sent until July 18, will be published no later than July 25th. The new system will start working not later than August 1. Upd: Still later. But funkionalnee.

10.06.2008 19:20, Peter Khramov:

New picture birch moth by Marina Shushkova .

03.06.2008 19:55, Peter Khramov:

Now, any user of the site has to offer lepidoptera.ru your photo to be published on the site. Please find terms of publication of the photographs on a special page and intereysom download them - on any page with the description of any species of butterfly.

03.06.2008 14:11, Peter Khramov:

Calliteara abietis and Egira conspicillaris .

28.05.2008 19:10, Peter Khramov:

Fluffy lasiocampidae and < em> Lithostege farinata . Author of pictures - Sergei Didenko .

27.05.2008 21:10, Peter Khramov:

Potential authors (and not only they) can read them on the special page .

19.05.2008 22:00, Peter Khramov:

Actually, the beginning of its work the new version of search by species and other taxa of butterflies on lepidoptera.ru. As always, comments and suggestions are made to the general e-mail address (see the. Bottom of the page). In order to look for something as simple as entering a search term in the top right of any page of the site and press Enter (Enter).

16.05.2008 20:44, Peter Khramov:

Troides helena ,
Morpho peleides ,
Morpho didius and
Caligo memnon .

10.05.2008 11:20, Peter Khramov:

Zygaenidae Swiss and oxalic and Hyles - Leghorn:



Zygaena transalpina
Adscita statices
Hyles livornica

08.05.2008 17:30, Peter Khramov:

Imago strelchatki oxalic .

08.05.2008 0:10, Peter Khramov:

New photo pestrokrylnitsy volatile and brief descriptions of several moths:

Eulithis populata - moth yellow
Eulithis mellinata
Erannis defoliaria - moth-stripped
Alsophila aescularia - moth Elm
Minoa murinata - moth Euphorbiaceae
Epirrhoe tristata - Larentsiya sad
Ecliptopera silaceata - Larentsiya kipreyny
Xanthorhoe ferrugata - Larentsiya volatile
Araschnia levana - Pestrokrylnitsa volatile
Ematurga atomaria - moth herbal

06.05.2008 11:30, Peter Khramov:

New Snapshot - page Ematurga atomaria . Short description - there.

06.05.2008 0:05, Peter Khramov:

Such as:


Ethmia bipunctella - Mole yellow-bellied chernotochechnaya
Carcina quercana
Tineola bisselliella - Moth Hanging
Hypsopygia costalis
Ephestia kuehniella - Ognyevka Mills
Dioryctria abietella - Ognyevka spruce

05.05.2008 12:45, Peter Khramov:

The number of species for which the site has lepidoptera.ru descriptions and / or photographs, passed through polutysyachnuyu mark.

05.05.2008 12:40, Peter Khramov:

The full list of updates:


Zeuzera pyrina - zeuzera pyrina
Cossus cossus - cossus cossus
Falcaria lacertinaria - Serpokrylka dry leaf
Cilix glaucata - Tupokrylka white
Drepana falcataria - Serpokrylka ordinary
Drepana curvatula - Serpokrylka alder
Tethea ocularis
Tethea or - Sovkovidka real gray
Habrosyne pyritoides - Sovkovidka raspberry
Thyatira batis - Sovkovidka pink
Zygaena lonicerae - zygaenidae fuciformis
Zygaena fausta - zygaenidae happy
Zygaena exulans - zygaenidae alpine
Zygaena ephialtes - zygaenidae volatile

04.05.2008 0:55, Peter Khramov:

The list below ...


Zygaena filipendulae - six-spot burnet
Zygaena trifolii - zygaenidae clover
Hepialus humuli - hepialidae hop
Phymatopus hecta
Clostera anachoreta - Kistochnitsa recluse
Clostera curtula - Kistochnitsa tailed
Clostera pigra - Kistochnitsa small
Clostera anastomosis - Kistochnitsa poplar
Ptilophora plumigera - Corydalis peristousaya
Harpyia milhauseri - Corydalis milgauzera
Notodonta tritophus - Corydalis light brown

03.05.2008 16:50, Peter Khramov:

Seven stuff:


Notodonta dromedarius - Corydalis alder
Notodonta ziczac - Corydalis lilac
Ptilodon capucina - Corydalis lime
Stauropus fagi - lobster moth
Pterostoma palpina - Corydalis ostrogolovaya
Amata phegea - Lzhepestryanka ordinary
Eilema depressa - Lishaynitsa flat

03.05.2008 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Addition to the traditional supraspecific


Limacodidae - Sliznevidki
Sphingidae - hawk moths


and species descriptions



Euproctis chrysorrhoea - yellowtail
Euproctis similis - Zheltoguzka
Lymantria dispar - Silkworm unpaired
Leucoma salicis - Moths willow
Arctornis l-nigrum - Moths el black
Orgyia recens - Red-spotted
Lymantria monacha - nun
Drymonia querna
Drymonia ruficornis
Pheosia gnoma
Pheosia tremula - Corydalis aspen
Gluphisia crenata - Silkworm dark gray wavy
Thaumetopoea pityocampa
Thaumetopoea pinivora - marching pine moth
Thaumetopoea processionea - oak silkworm marching
Apoda limacodes - Butterfly Multiped
Pelosia obtusa
Pelosia muscerda - Pelosi gray

03.05.2008 1:00, Peter Khramov:

New site for the species:


Setina irrorella - Lishaynitsa molevidnaya yellow
Atolmis rubricollis - Lishaynitsa krasnosheynaya
Eilema sororcula - Lishaynitsa golden
Eilema complana - Lishaynitsa ordinary
Eilema lurideola - Lishaynitsa lead-gray
Lithosia quadra - Lishaynitsa chetyrehpyatnistaya
Cybosia mesomella - Lishaynitsa beautiful

01.05.2008 1:00, Peter Khramov:

Updates and additions over the last couple of days:

Miltochrista miniata - Lishaynitsa pink Parasemia plantaginis - Podorozhnitsa ordinary Mimas tiliae - Hyles lime Laothoe populi - Hyles poplar Smerinthus ocellata - Hyles mottled Agrius convolvuli - Hyles convolvulaceae Sphinx ligustri - Hyles lilac Hyloicus pinastri - Sphinx Pinastri Hyles euphorbiae - Hyles euphorbiae Hyles galii - Hyles Gallii Deilephila porcellus - Hyles small wine Deilephila elpenor - Hyles average wine Macroglossum stellatarum - hummingbird hawk-moth < em> Proserpinus proserpina - Hyles zubokryly

28.04.2008 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Apterona helicoidella Canephora hirsuta - bagworm moth monochrome Sterrhopterix fusca - bagworm moth hairy Daphnis nerii - Daphnis Nerii Hemaris tityus - Hobotnik skabiozovy Hemaris fuciformis < / em> - Hobotnik shmelevidny Acherontia atropos - Hyles dead head Saturnia pavonia - small night peacock Aglia tau - Red Night Peacock

28.04.2008 14:50, Peter Khramov:

Yesterday and today - some additions to the descriptions, as well as a completely new website for information on the following types:

Spilosoma lubricipeda - Bear speckled Hyphantria cunea - The American white butterfly Spilosoma lutea - Bear yellow Phragmatobia fuliginosa - Dipper mobile Phragmatobia luctifera - Black Bear Hyphoraia aulica - Bear brown-yellow Coscinia cribraria < / em> - Bear striped white Spiris striata - Bear striped yellow Diaphora mendica - Bear-beggar Rhyparia purpurata - Purple Bear Diacrisia sannio - Bear Meadow Tyria jacobaeae - Bear bloody Euplagia quadripunctaria - Bear ger Arctia festiva - Bear Hebe Callimorpha dominula - Bear Ms. Paranthrene tabaniformis - sesiidae poplar small Sesia apiformis - sesiidae poplar big .

25.04.2008 23:23, Peter Khramov:


Furcula bicuspis
Furcula bifida
Furcula furcula
Cerura erminea
Cerura vinula

25.04.2008 1:55, Peter Khramov:

Information this Red a blues from the Red Book.

23.04.2008 13:13, Peter Khramov:

He - pear pavlinoglazki .

18.04.2008 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Two of the most famous Nymphalidae: Aglais urticae - urticaria and
Inachis io - Daily Peacock .

15.04.2008 21:02, Peter Khramov:

Namely, added another piece of information for the following:


Vanessa cardui - Painted Lady
Vanessa atalanta - Admiral
Neptis sappho - char Sappho
Neptis rivularis - char tavolgovaya
Limenitis camilla - lentochnik Camilla
Limenitis populi - lentochnik poplar
Limenitis reducta - Single row lentochnik

14.04.2008 20:40, Peter Khramov:

Adding another species and information about it - perelivnitsa Schrenk (Apatura schrenckii) and additions to the second type - perelivnitsa small (Apatura ilia) .

13.04.2008 17:50, Peter Khramov:

Description as before, located in the same place

11.04.2008 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Performed additional work to optimize your site code is now issuing the pages, especially with descriptions of individual species will become even faster. Even if this site decided to completely deflate a couple of fans with teleports.

10.04.2008 18:00, Peter Khramov:

« Rare and protected species of butterflies (Insecta: Lepidoptera) Polovtsian-Kupanskogo bog ».

08.04.2008 20:40, Peter Khramov:

Has laid out a modest description Ussuri tolstotela .

07.04.2008 20:50, Peter Khramov:


Pachypasa otus - tolstotel cypress
Dendrolimus segregastes - cedar moth
Dendrolimus pini - lasiocampidae pine
Odonestis pruni - moth plum

30.03.2008 14:44, Peter Khramov:

Today kratenko considered two European (and not only European) species belonging to the genus with the romantic name bellied moth . Outwardly, they both - and Gastropacha quercifolia , and G.populifolia similar, but the differences are still there, both in the adult stage, and caterpillars from the pupae, and in addition, a second species - poplar moth - occurs much less often the first - oakleaf silkworm. Illustration for both types of online yet ...

28.03.2008 20:00, Peter Khramov:

Edited descriptions herbal and Malin silkworms, added information on new types of - silkworm Ussuri grassy , shelkopryadu notched gray and reddish silkworm notched .

27.03.2008 21:00, Peter Khramov:

List updated or newly added types:


Lasiocampa trifolii
Lasiocampa quercus
Eriogaster neogena
Eriogaster lanestris
Eriogaster catax
Eriogaster rimicola
Poecilocampa populi .

26.03.2008 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Additives to the descriptions purple and blue sashes and ringed silkworm . New definitions Pyreinoye and Euphorbiaceae silkworms.

25.03.2008 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Addenda to certain types lasiocampidae:


Moth fenestrated
lasiocampidae pine
lasiocampidae ringed .


And a description of their supraspecific taxa:

lasiocampidae
Silkworm motley
Silkworm hairy
Silkworm fluffy
Silkworm spineless
lasiocampidae
Silkworm raspberry
Tolstotel
Silkworm coniferous
Silkworm cereal
Silkworm bellied
Silkworm plum .

24.03.2008 20:50, Peter Khramov:

The remains:


Catocala fulminea - yellow sash
Catocala promissa - a small red ribbon


lasiocampidae and others:




Dendrolimus pini - Pine lasiocampidae
Lasiocampa trifolii - lasiocampidae clover
Macrothylacia rubi - lasiocampidae raspberries
Lasiocampa quercus

21.03.2008 18:00, Peter Khramov:

Catocala nupta .

26.02.2008 20:31, Peter Khramov:

Today, additions and updatings for species such as
willow sash ,
blue sash ,
purple lentochnitsa ,
red and yellow sash ,
southern yellow sash ,
dark yellow sash ,
yellow sash .

22.02.2008 21:00, Peter Khramov:


Catocala pacta - pink ribbon
Catocala promissa - small red ribbon
Catocala sponsa - purple lentochnitsa
Catocala dilecta - southern red ribbon.

21.02.2008 21:00, Peter Khramov:

New definitions: poplar sash (Catocala elocata) , ivovaya sash (Catocala electa) . Editing old: lentochnitsa red (Catocala nupta) .

16.02.2008 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Home Topics sashes , corresponding subfamily lentochnits and the first several kinds:

Catocala fraxini - a blue sash
Catocala sponsa - purple lentochnitsy
Catocala nupta - lentochnitsy red .

05.02.2008 0:00, Peter Khramov:

By trivia about forest pests. And other fruit trees.

04.02.2008 18:45, Peter Khramov:


Sennitsa glitserion (Coenonympha glycerion)
Sennitsa Gero (Coenonympha hero)
Peat satyr (Coenonympha oedippus)

04.02.2008 12:45, Peter Khramov:


Erebia montana - Nigella goanta
Erebia alberganus - Nigella Cato
Erebia triaria - Alpine satyr
Erebia stirius - Nerina
Erebia pandrose - Lapland satyr
Erebia epistygne - Nigella stigna

03.02.2008 18:50, Peter Khramov:

Today, the talk was about the glorious way Chernushkas. Thanks not modern, but quite capacious work K. Lampert, to update the description of the existing species and then add something new - t. E. Those for which the earlier descriptions on our site were not. So, the new information about the following types:


Erebia tyndarus - Nigella Tindaro
Erebia ligea - Nigella coffee
Erebia euryale - Euryale
Erebia aethiops - Ethiopian
Erebia gorge - Gorga
Erebia pronoe - Nigella pronoya
Oeneis glacialis - satyr ice
Erebia scipio - Scipio
Erebia oeme - Nigella EMA
Erebia medusa - Nigella jellyfish
Erebia manto - Nigella coat
Erebia pharte - Nigella Fartagh
Erebia mnestra - Nigella mnestra
Erebia eriphyle - Nigella Erief
Erebia melampus - Nigella chalks
Erebia epiphron - Nigella epifron

02.02.2008 18:45, Peter Khramov:

The site features many pictures of butterflies from the Vlad Proklova - a man not only versed in butterflies, but do not shoot them Lenya.

29.01.2008 19:00, Peter Khramov:

Descriptions butterflies:


A new
Danaus chrysippus - Danaus Chrysippus


Supplemented
Pyronia tithonus - krupnoglazka yellow-brown
Hyponephele lycaon - small krupnoglazka
Maniola jurtina - ox eye
Melanargia galathea - pestroglazka Galatea

11.01.2008 17:00, Peter Khramov:

New definitions of butterflies from the family of the scoop: Swiss scoops (Rhyacia helvetina) , своки-притворщицы (Rhyacia simulans) and big scoops zheltokryloy (Noctua pronuba) .

29.12.2007 19:00, Peter Khramov:

Recent updates to the description and the latest new description:

Lentochnik Camilla
Lentochnik poplar
checkered avriniya
checkered southern
checkered red

24.12.2007 21:20, Peter Khramov:


Melitaea athalia
Boloria selene
Boloria euphrosyne
Brenthis ino
Issoria lathonia
Argynnis aglaja .

20.12.2007 14:20, Peter Khramov:

Today posted stories about the two of them - Vlade Proklova and Maxim Klepikova .

19.12.2007 1:30, Peter Khramov:

Four types:
large forest ,
adippa ,
Niobe ,
pandora .

18.12.2007 20:00, Peter Khramov:

The addition to the description of pestrokrylnitsy and the beginning of a new specification - greenish perlamutrovki (Argynnis laodice) .

15.12.2007 23:00, Peter Khramov:

Complemented by the story of the two representatives of the family:
painted lady and
Admiral .

12.12.2007 20:10, Peter Khramov:

hives with NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA < / a> head cycle to supplement the description of a family of butterflies Nymphalidae .

12.12.2007 19:10, Peter Khramov:

Due to numerous requests / observations are now available for each type of author and year of description.

12.12.2007 18:18, Peter Khramov:

Today is

Dryad (Minois dryas) ,
small krupnoglazka (Hyponephele lycaon) and
ox eye (Maniola jurtina) .

12.12.2007 15:15, Peter Khramov:

The photos of the day and night butterflies from Elena kenunen. Among them:
Thymelicus lineola ,
Spilosoma lutea ,
Pyrrhia umbra ,
Polyommatus amandus ,
Axylia putris ,
Autographa excelsa ,
willow perelivnitsa (Apatura iris) .

11.12.2007 23:05, Peter Khramov:

A couple of lines in addition to the description of the types: satyrinae buharnikovaya , brizeida .

11.12.2007 17:00, Peter Khramov:

Thanks to Maxim Klepikov, the site appeared the following picture of butterflies.


Teleiodes proximella
Teleiodes luculella
Teleiodes alburnella
Satyrium w-album - theclinae Elm
Pyralis regalis
Pterostoma palpina
Pseudotelphusa scalella
Pseudophilotes vicrama
Polypogon tentacularia
Polyommatus semiargus - copper-butterfly bean
Poecilocampa populi
Plebeius optilete
Plebeius argus - copper-butterfly Argus
Phalera bucephala
Parnassius mnemosyne - Mnemosyne
Pararge aegeria - Krupnoglazka Egeria
Ochlodes venata
Micropterix calthella
Lycaena hippothoe - Chervonets sorrel
Melitaea cinxia - checkered tsinksiya
Malacosoma castrensis
Maculinea arion - large blue
Macaria alternata
Lopinga achine - Krupnoglazka
Lasiommata petropolitana
Heteropterus morpheus - Tolstogolovka Morpheus
Glaucopsyche alexis
Falcaria lacertinaria
Eupithecia icterata
Euphydryas maturna - checkered maturna
Euphydryas aurinia
Eriocrania sparrmannella
Ectropis crepuscularia
Coenonympha tullia
Coenonympha pamphilus - Sennitsa ordinary
Coenonympha glycerion - Sennitsa glitserion
Carterocephalus silvicola
Carterocephalus palaemon - Krepkogolovka Palemon
Brenthis ino
Euphydryas maturna - checkered maturna

10.12.2007 20:30, Peter Khramov:

Additions: H. semele .

07.12.2007 15:00, Peter Khramov:

congregation of caterpillars Aporia Crataegi shot Thank Ivushkin.

06.12.2007 13:00, Peter Khramov:

Actually ... Hamearis lucina .

02.12.2007 22:12, Peter Khramov:

Additive. Circe .

30.11.2007 21:20, Peter Khramov:

Actually:
Coenonympha glycerion - Sennitsa glitserion ,
Coenonympha arcania - Sennitsa Arkania ,
Coenonympha pamphilus - Sennitsa ordinary .

29.11.2007 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Galatea ( Melanargia galathea ),
velvet ( Lasiommata maera ),
shrew ( Lasiommata megera ),
Egeria ( Pararge aegeria ).

28.11.2007 21:15, Peter Khramov:

In the following example of its representatives:
Erebia aethiops - Ethiopian ,
Erebia medusa - jellyfish ,
Erebia ligea - League ,
Erebia euryale - Euryale .

26.11.2007 20:10, Peter Khramov:

Continuing the theme Lycaenidae . The descriptions of new species, editing old ones. In general, as usual.


Lycaena alciphron - ducat purple
Lycaena hippothoe - ducat sorrel
Lycaena dispar - ducat unpaired
Lycaena virgaureae - scarce copper
Lycaena tityrus - ducat chernopyatnisty
Lycaena helle - ducat bluish
Lycaena phlaeas - ducat spotted
Callophrys rubi - Green Hairstreak
Satyrium w-album - theclinae Elm
Thecla betulae - marshmallows birch
Neozephyrus quercus - marshmallow oak
Polyommatus coridon - copper-butterfly silver .

25.11.2007 20:02, Peter Khramov:

So it called. « copper-butterfly beautiful ». Polyommatus bellargus .

25.11.2007 19:40, Peter Khramov:

Description of a new species - tolstogolovki Morpheus (Heteropterus morpheus) and supplements to the two old - tolstogolovke ezhegolovnikovoy (Erynnis tages) and krepkogolovke Palemon (Carterocephalus palaemon) .

23.11.2007 12:30, Peter Khramov:

This time profile Colias croceus , she's Colias crocea .

18.11.2007 22:00, Peter Khramov:

There were shots Aporia crataegi , Pontia daplidice and Colias erate .

17.11.2007 21:00, Peter Khramov:

Descriptions of new species of butterflies - lemmings tavolgovoy and Sappho , as well as additions to the speeches of the day Peacock , многоцветнице and uglokrylnitse With white < em> (Polygonia c-album) .

16.11.2007 20:10, Peter Khramov:

In the first series of photographs present images
Aethalura punctulata ,
Aricia artaxerxes ,
Archinemapogon yildizae ,
Anacampsis blattariella ,
Archiearis parthenias ,
Boloria selene ,
Boloria titania ,
Boloria aquilonaris and
Boloria eunomia .

15.11.2007 14:22, Peter Khramov:

Edited stories about poplar and willow perelivnitsah.

14.11.2007 23:23, Peter Khramov:

Additions, changes, and a couple of new lines for the following types of butterflies:

large tortoiseshell - Nymphalis polychloros
hives - Aglais urticae
Painted Lady - Vanessa cardui
Sennitsa ordinary - Coenonympha pamphilus
oxen eyes - Maniola jurtina
Vixen - Lasiommata megera
Pestroglazka Galatea - Melanargia galathea
Chervonets spotted - Lycaena phlaeas
Perlamutrovka Aglaia - Argynnis aglaja
checkered Atalia - Melitaea athalia
Pestrokrylnitsa volatile - Araschnia levana
Uglokrylnitsa With white - Polygonia c-album
NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA - Nymphalis antiopa
Day peacock - Inachis io
common blue - Polyommatus icarus
scarce copper - Lycaena virgaureae

14.11.2007 18:30, Peter Khramov:

Photo Chamaesphecia schmidtiiformis , as well as descriptions of the eight species of butterflies, including the ларенция ocher yellow (Camptogramma bilineata) , checkered Atalia (Melitaea athalia) , scoop pyramid (Amphipyra pyramidea) , scoop Khobotnev (Hypena proboscidalis) , moth herbal (Euthrix potatoria) , bear kaya (Arctia caja) , bear rustic (Arctia villica) and bear matron (Pericallia matronula) .

13.11.2007 20:20, Peter Khramov:

Uglokrylnitsa With white : description and illustration. Spotted ducat : illustrate the description of the new photograph.

06.11.2007 17:25, Peter Khramov:

Lined Article Maxim Klepikova « Butterflies of (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) as a reference group of biological diversity in the planning of protected areas in the Yaroslavl Zavolzhja" and « the fauna of Lepidoptera (Insecta: Lepidoptera) planned national park" Mologa "and adjacent territories (Yaroslavl region)." .

06.11.2007 0:45, Peter Khramov:

Original photo Melitaea athalia , Erebia ligea , Arctia villica , Arctia caja , Aphantopus hyperantus , Euthrix potatoria , Limenitis populi , Papilio machaon and Polyommatus icarus .

31.10.2007 17:45, Peter Khramov:

Amphipyra pyramidea . Photo only, nothing else.

28.10.2007 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Namely - the description of a dozen species: Cupido argiades - argiad , Lycaena dispar - ducat unpaired , Lycaena phlaeas - chervonets spotted , Neozephyrus quercus - marshmallow oak , Satyrium ilicis - theclinae padubovaya , Scolitantides orion - copper-butterfly Orion , Plebeius argus - copper-butterfly Argus , Celastrina argiolus - copper-butterfly buckthorn , Plebeius idas and Maculinea teleius .

24.10.2007 18:00, Peter Khramov:

We talk about various copper-butterfly - as a true blue, and blue, green and even brown:
Aricia agestis - copper-butterfly brown ,
Aricia artaxerxes ,
Polyommatus semiargus - copper-butterfly bean ,
Polyommatus coridon - copper-butterfly silver ,
Thecla betulae - marshmallows birch ,
Maculinea arion - large blue ,
Polyommatus damon - greenish copper-butterfly ,
Polyommatus bellargus - copper-butterfly beautiful .

24.10.2007 12:48, Peter Khramov:

Getting to know some of our views and our tolstogolovok: Carterocephalus palaemon - krepkogolovka Palemon , Thymelicus acteon - tolstogolovka piebald , Thymelicus sylvestris , Erynnis tages - tolstogolovka blackish , Pyrgus malvae - tolstogolovka small Malvaceae , Hesperia comma - tolstogolovka comma .

23.10.2007 19:35, Peter Khramov:

Continued excerpts from the history of satyrs. Today briefly ran over velvet (Lasiommata maera) , krupnoglazke (Lopinga achine) , Sennitsy ordinary (Coenonympha pamphilus) and Sennitsy Gero ( Coenonympha hero) . Moreover, lined with some information on shrew (Lasiommata megera) , Eger (Pararge aegeria) , jellyfish < / a> (Erebia medusa) , Gorgo (Erebia gorge) , brizeidah (Chazara briseis) and дриадах (Minois dryas) . It is also not forgotten yellow-brown krupnoglazka (Pyronia tithonus) , Arethusa, also known as redbanded satyrinae (Arethusana arethusa) , Ice satyr (Oeneis glacialis) and Nigella Erebia alberganus .

22.10.2007 16:30, Peter Khramov:

Add a crumb for the following types of information: Brintesia circe - Circe , Hipparchia semele - Semele and Hipparchia fagi .

12.10.2007 10:08, Peter Khramov:

Sketches by perstroglazke Galatea (Melanargia galathea) .

11.10.2007 12:05, Peter Khramov:

Where and how to live perlamutrovka field - Issoria lathonia , perlamutrovka evfrosina - Boloria euphrosyne , perlamutrovka large - Argynnis paphia , perlamutrovka Aglaia - Argynnis aglaja , checkered maturna - Euphydryas maturna , checkered tsinksiya - Melitaea cinxia and checkered Phoebe - Melitaea phoebe .

09.10.2007 23:45, Peter Khramov:

New nimfaliy: pestrokrylnitsa volatile (Araschnia levana) , letochnik poplar (Limenitis populi) , Camille lentochnik (Limenitis camilla) , perelivnitsa willow (Apatura iris) and perelivnitsa poplar (Apatura ilia) .

07.10.2007 18:10, Peter Khramov:

Texts about hives and NYMPHALIS ANTIOPA - two strongly-known representatives of Nymphalidae, slightly less popular large tortoiseshell and not described for Russian Charaxes jasius .

05.10.2007 20:55, Peter Khramov:

The texts of the six kinds of our beauties moles:
mole chehlonosnaya oak - Coleophora anatipenella ,
codling moth-grit white - Lyonetia clerkella ,
moles sprout brown - Argyresthia conjugella ,
mole chehlonosnaya larch - Coleophora laricella , and
Argyresthia pruniella and
Coleophora hemerobiella .

03.10.2007 21:45, Peter Khramov:

Some information about the representatives Nymphalidae - day peacock (Inachis io) , Admiral (Vanessa atalanta) and Painted Lady (Vanessa cardui) . Also - a little bit of copper-butterfly (about common blue - Polyommatus icarus , Green Hairstreak - Callophrys rubi and chervonetz fire - Lycaena virgaureae ).And three of satyrs - ox eye (Maniola jurtina) , Nigella coffee (Erebia ligea) and eye flower (Aphantopus hyperantus) .

02.10.2007 12:50, Peter Khramov:

Lined first brief descriptions of Pandemis cerasana - budworm currant krivousoy , Rhyacionia buoliana - pobegovyuna wintering and Totrix viridana - листовертки oak .

26.09.2007 20:54, Peter Khramov:

Refinement in appearance golden zheltushki .

26.09.2007 0:24, Peter Khramov:

Added a brief description of Macdunnoughia confusa - plusiinae drops and Pyralis farinalis - flour moth .

22.09.2007 21:25, Peter Khramov:

New photos of butterflies Samptogramma bilineata ,
Cupido argiades ,
Hypena proboscidalis ,
Macdunnoughia confusa ,
Pieris brassicae ,
Pieris napi ,
Pieris rapae ,
Pyralis farinalis ,
Vanessa cardui .

17.09.2007 16:53, Peter Khramov:

Added photos to the descriptions Admiral , which is Vanessa atalanta and dnevnogo Peacock , which is Inachis io . In addition, the illustrated article on meadow zheltushka , also known as Colias hyale .

14.09.2007 18:53, Peter Khramov:

Site Lepidoptera.ru publicly begins his mortal existence on the web. Interested visitors are welcomed, and potential authors - even more.

* Перевод комментария с английской версии сайта

* По умолчанию все комментарии c русского на английский переводит Петр Храмов с участием машинного перевода. Если вы хотите по максимуму сохранить авторский стиль либо просто облегчить жизнь переводчику — скопируйте текст вместе с тегами из окна с русским комментарием, вставьте его в окно английского и замените русский текст на английский, сохранив теги.

-->

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.