Asota contorta Aurivillius, 1894

14.09.2014 4:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Poor, badly wrong, that there is still no editing.
I add to these two specific types: if you know the Lord as hard for me personally was their chew ....
Photos hanging from June to uncertainty and only now the truth was revealed.For photos of these species virtually no network (gugleniya easy it eloquently shows), and the Japanese, on all known jpmoth they both stand in uncertain how Asota sp. Hence, the focus is on my side .....

14.09.2014 2:55, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Everything is clear, ladies and gentlemen. I have no more questions. Just thought ashamed to say that the site is considered to be the opinion of the author, pretending that there is no such site at all, illustrating his photo of both sexes (thank God they are in the collection).It seems wrong (
I do not know, by the way: what is this about estetika design when I think all you can do better than to put a photo underside to "scrap" (pin): the benefit is possible. Of course then I will change, but not the point ... Whereupon, this issue otklanivayus. No offense )))

14.09.2014 0:57, Peter Khramov

The common opinion is that the bet when there is a choice, yet. Later made configurable, but for now - is wrong. We now have 500 kinds for all the other Fota not yet checked. So there is something to do ...

13.09.2014 21:50, Alexandr Zhakov

Basil left to Peter, put some butterfly species on the page, the main thing here aesthetic. And if we look to male and female, from the nature or straightened, waved it to change the photos. Here there are still photos on pages and already redefined and in the types of pictures there.

13.09.2014 21:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Here is the same story as with Asota clara. It is advisable to replace the photo The underside of the male on top of female photos. View to illustrate both sexes. Moreover, there is a picture :)

11.09.2014 10:07, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Peter added scope for your example: its confused by God, where it is added (flesh-field would be there) :)
It can drive a still from England in Wikipedia sources? But I'm all for this wiki carefully (too pop are resources). And if you read the home: so sometimes hair stand on end .....Too bad that no version of the post though, would be up to the moment when an answer (forumnye) :) That has to append ....

11.09.2014 8:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Here, in short: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asota_contorta
Wikipedia is summarized here: http://www.aganaidae.nl/main_detail.asp?Id=33 (yesterday I have this source added, there is a lot of useful).
Forms do not pop and maybe those same Japanese will take determination and data from our website :)))))

11.09.2014 7:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I add: something for him there from England in Wikipedia. There can sometimes look: it is only in the domestic stuff going on with this case :)

11.09.2014 7:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Because of personal data, Peter. I in general somehow confuse these questions if there is a form for filing such information. I have the same needs something to find out about species that are not only online, but also in my personal collection. There is also a personal interest to know something about the species that even the Japanese revered here on jp.moth are just like sp.:)
These species generally in Google a few photos. I am very pleased that they have decided, and you whence infa :)

11.09.2014 2:49, Peter Khramov

Basil and where firewood geography and synonyms? And where did wingspan, which is generally in any form is not in the "Detailed information ..."?

11.09.2014 0:43, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Wingspan: No formalized data → 59—62 mm.

08.09.2014 22:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan.