Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of Hymenoptera (wasps, bees, ants)

Pages: 1 ...268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277

Likes: 1

30.12.2021 14:02, ИНО

But I doubt it-all the brachymeria has a yellow or white pattern, besides, some morphological features in the" Green " did not converge. There are a lot of similar genera of chalcidinae - I'm confused about them. In addition, for most types of normal images in the network was not found. I am almost sure that only one hind leg can be determined, at least up to the genus, because there the sculpture is very peculiar, but there is no exact one on the photos from the network, and the key using this feature was also not found. Apparently, you will have to spread your wings (in the hope of not breaking anything off at the same time, in which I have bitter experience with such a trifle) and take pictures from all angles. Given the hemorrhoids of the process-probably after NG.

And for ichneumonidae (or is it not ichneumonidae?) What do you say?

Likes: 1

31.12.2021 0:46, ИНО

I did finish shooting chalcida. As I was afraid, I tore the wing into the trash in the process of spreading (they, it turns out, are folded, like vespids - after such an experience, I will no longer swear at the difficulty of spreading the wings of microdineruses

), but the vein seems to have remained.

user posted image

I also tried to turn" Green", but where is it: there are a lot of genera, the signs are unclear, the quality of drawings is not important, photos by name are almost not Googled. And what are similar ones Googled? signed by such genera, which in the "Green" does not exist at all. Unless I was sure it wasn't brahimeria. Well, okay, this one is a random tenant of a hornet's nest, you can get off with the definition of a family even. But there is a very small pteromalid in the queue, which is undoubtedly a hyperparzitoid of the wasp prasitoid, and this one certainly needs to be determined before the species. And there is generally darkness, I obviously can't handle it myself, and I don't know where to ask for help. There is no way to send specialists for the territory of the DPR, only photos.

The message was edited INO-31.12.2021 02: 15

Likes: 1

04.01.2022 1:56, ИНО

To determine it, I had to register on the enemy Yynaturalizde, and at the same time on the enemy Google, because mail.these Russophobes do not take <url> for mail . But it was worth it - a certain European specialist identified it in just a day as Psilochalcis nigerrima. I found a picture, it seems similar. The back thigh, at least, is exactly like that.

With the key, I got a complete bummer after rejecting the brahimery (everything is very clear there: brachiimeria has oblique ends of the shins, only one spur on them and thighs with large teeth, which is clearly not my case). Apart from that, they are all colored. But then - some kind of horror, like the vein fitting to the front edge of the wing or non-fitting (despite the fact that in the figures to which references are given, both options look almost the same) and dense or loose punctuation of the mid-spine with a similar lack of specific criteria for determining this density itself. In general, I did not like that key in the "Green".

Alas, the pteromalid, whose photos I didn't even post here, was identified only to the subfamily pteromalina, which is completely disappointing. But there is a big problem with the sawyere - someone ate them almost completely before the collection, and all the keys are evil for the sawyere

The message was edited INO-04.01.2022 02: 00

17.01.2022 14:18, CosMosk

I took a picture. There is some kind of lamellar expansion at the top, there are no teeth.

Yes, there is no tooth on the scapus, what is the difference between males of the supposed genus-not it.
Adriano Cazzuoli specializes in chalcides, but I don't know how cool he is - I've seen his mistakes in neighboring macrotaxons. His version probably works.

And you shouldn't have posted a dozen photos of 3 MB each directly here - not everyone will wait for this page to load. Although the convenience of external hosting inat gives. maybe a direct link to all the observations, who needs it, with a separate preview - what to go for?
ACCORDING to the signs-there is not enough of a mustache, there you need to see the rings of the muzhdu scapus and flagellum-1,2? mandible teeth, etc. - you can find your way around the key of the sub-family if you start right from there.
I'm currently sorting out my chalcides, and I've collected some new photos from rezgate to add to my other stocks... while rotten. stock and yours-suddenly overshadowed. Pteromalins are very monotonous. like so many other things (infinite biodiversity is already depressing)).

Most of the time, this site didn't load for me. It also required the inclusion of a java script , which is also an incorrect technology.

This post was edited by CosMosk - 17.01.2022 14: 35

Likes: 1

17.01.2022 14:34, CosMosk

Hello! (Corrected query with numbering)

Please help me identify insects for writing my research project for the 9th grade of school. Thank you in advance for your help.
The insects were filmed in Blagoveshchensk (Amur Region), in the summer of June 12-27, 2021.

Okay, I'll venture to help, for the primary sorting.
1,2,40 Camponotus ?piceus ??ssp.sakhalinensis
3,7,9,10,11 Crabronidae
4,12 Poemenia? (Poemeniinae, ichneumonidae)
5 Vespinae =? 42-Vespa crabro (hornet)
6,8,13 Eumeninae,?Symmorphus sp
11,20 Chrysis
14-16 Ichneumonidae, Cryptini, ??Osprynchotina (subtribe, - suggested by lifestyle,
these are particularly prone to parasitize aboveground-nesting Stingers (Aculeata))
or let's say Agrothereutina.
17,37 Polistes
18-19 Apis mellifera
21 wasps, unclear
22,26,29 bees Megachilidae
23-25, 27-28, 32, 34, 36 Pompilidae, like all Dipogon sp.
30-31, 41 Sapygidae,?Sapyga
33 Gasteruption (Gasteruptiidae)
35 Anthidium (Megachilidae)
38 Ichneumonidae, Phygadeuontinae?
39 Halictidae
43 Crabronidae,Psenini

This post was edited by CosMosk - 18.01.2022 04: 39

Likes: 1

18.01.2022 5:45, ИНО

To be honest, I understood from your words only a little more than shit. What kind of "Irantsi"? Except for the expert nicknames, thank you for that. With the rings, it seems, I figured out: the second ring in some Dibrachys is by no means radically smaller and almost square in proportions, and in Coelopisthia it is even longer in length than in width! Why call it a ringlet, H. Z. By the way, with these proportions, another ambush was discovered-the whisker is far from cylindrical in cross - section, and the visible proportions of the segments may differ, depending on the angle at which it lies. I made two preparations, where the antennae lie in different ways, you can feel the difference (there are already photos of them on the Naturalizde, in the balm through a 40x lens-you can count the sensillae, not like the segments).

18.01.2022 18:58, ИНО

I read about dibrachisam this and this. Mine didn't match anything from there. But there are some species that were not considered in those works, for example, Dibrachys crassiscapus from the Odessa region. Naturally, there are no photos of them at all and nowhere (I suspect that not only on the Internet, but also in nature in general), they did not participate in the revisions, we can only look for protologues and hope that they are written quite sane. Nevertheless, I believe that in this case the chances of a new species are quite high: no one has yet noticed any second-order parasitoids on Latibulus argiolus, although its jumping cocoons are quite a popular living toy of entomologists. It is not so easy to get to its larvae, polist wasps protect the nest from everything that moves, and if you do not have special adaptations to overcome this protection, but simply poke the ovipositor into everything that gets there, then there is little chance of successfully breeding offspring in such conditions. But I'd also like to make sure I didn't miss Rod...

Pages: 1 ...268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277