E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318... 854

01.02.2011 20:53, Mantispid

The spots on the sides are thicker and coarser. Almost the same points are located in a group on the pronotum disc, whereas in the previous specimen the disc was glabrous. But I think this can be attributed to polymorphism of this type. In any case, a search on the Internet showed that the weather is very different. So this is it.

01.02.2011 21:21, Alexander Zarodov

no, it's definitely Scolytus, like a variant of S. ratzeburgi Jans. if there is a beetle, look, there are button-shaped elevations on the sternites, and it would be desirable to take a photo from below...I think the picture will be more clear.
Here it is important to know what else is caught or what station... this scolitus lives under the bark of a birch tree, so it is birch tongue.gif  smile.gif


I flew to the light and flew away safely smile.gifPoking around in Scolytus, but without the beetle, it seems, without a chance...

02.02.2011 3:40, akulich-sibiria

I flew to the light and flew away safely smile.gifPoking around in Scolytus, but without the beetle, it seems, without a chance...

I will choose S. ratzeburgi Jans, dotted pronotum and elytra, color....yes, better with bug yes.gif
Likes: 1

02.02.2011 6:52, Dmitry Vlasov

2DoubleA: Scolytus is not necessarily ratzeburgi Jans... Elm sapwoods are widely distributed in Moscow: S. scolytus; S. multistriatus; S. sulcifrons... Therefore, in the absence of a beetle-an exact definition is impossible!
Likes: 1

02.02.2011 7:31, akulich-sibiria

just assumed based on their fees. I also spoke about the need for more detailed information.

02.02.2011 11:26, gumenuk

Maybe someone will help to establish the type of this crunch, brought from Turkey.
Capture dapa in the file name.

Pictures:
picture: 31.05.2010__DSC05002.jpg
31.05.2010__DSC05002.jpg — (157.09к)

picture: 31.05.2010__DSC05007.jpg
31.05.2010__DSC05007.jpg — (161.89к)

02.02.2011 13:01, Mantispid

Aphodius
General view, platypus, hind leg and part of pronotum close-up.
Saratov region, Rovno district, village of Lugovskoe, in a soil trap at the entrance to the burrow ?Ground squirrel
body length is approximately 5-6 mm

02.02.2011 14:19, AGG

A. rufus (Moll.) horns not visible-female

This post was edited by AGG-02.02.2011 14: 21
Likes: 1

02.02.2011 17:46, Alexander Zarodov

Now the nutcracker shuffle.gifMO, mid-June

Could it be Hemicrepidius hirtus, the pronotum seems to be different from that of niger?

Pictures:
picture: elat06191xx.jpg
elat06191xx.jpg — (150.18к)

02.02.2011 21:27, AGG

please help with zhuzhami from Kazakhstan
Kobyltobe11-09-09 18 mm
[attachmentid ()=105136]
Janybek 8-09-09 27mm
picture: 04.jpg
same neighborhood and then...
one type or 2 and which one (s)
picture: 05.jpg
and a few cymindis
sps ?
picture: 06.jpg
?lateralis
picture: 07.jpg
picta
picture: 08.jpg

03.02.2011 16:26, косинус

According to the click, I think that this is still Hemicrepidius hirtus, although I would like to see the photo from above and find out the dimensions.







What is the current fashion for yellow labels ????=))
It looks cool.

03.02.2011 17:46, Alexander Zarodov

According to the click, I think that this is still Hemicrepidius hirtus, although I would like to see the photo from above and find out the dimensions.


With the size difficult, but not less than 12 mm

Pictures:
picture: schelkun1002.jpg
schelkun1002.jpg — (140.79к)

03.02.2011 19:18, косинус

Everything seems like Hemicrepidius niger, but the pronotum is confusing. The species are very similar to each other, it's hard to say for sure. For an unambiguous definition, you need to turn the specimen in your hands, with a microscope, and the 12th volume of the Fauna of the USSR (issue 4) .

03.02.2011 19:41, алекс 2611

Everything seems like Hemicrepidius niger, but the pronotum is confusing. The species are very similar to each other, it's hard to say for sure. For an unambiguous definition, it is necessary to turn the specimen in your hands, with a microscope, and the 12th volume of the Fauna of the USSR (issue 4).


The 12th volume of Fauna of the USSR (issue 4) does not contain the genus Hemicrepidius.
It's even a different subfamily. tongue.gif
Likes: 1

03.02.2011 21:52, AGG

"What is the current fashion for yellow labels????=))
It looks cool. "
I already wrote about this - a personal quirk for the convenience of work
, but what about the beetles? weep.gif
or by what book they can be identified, it is better for all Kazakhstan beetles, otherwise I still have Blaps from there "hung" wall.gif

03.02.2011 22:25, Jaguar paw

the photos are not mine, so please excuse the quality. please help with the definition.
All photos were taken in Georgia.

1) Capnodis cariosa?
user posted image

2) Someone from Purpuricenus?
user posted image

3) chrisomelidae
user posted image

4) bronzovka
user posted image

5) male polyphagi...?
user posted image

thank you in advance.

6
user posted image

7
not a bug. one of the cicadas?
user posted image

This post was edited by Jaguar paw-04.02.2011 15: 27

04.02.2011 13:50, Victor Titov

the photos are not mine, so please excuse the quality. please help with the definition.
All photos were taken in Georgia.

2) Yes, Purpuricenus sp.
3) Cryptocephalus sericeus
4) Cetonia aurata
Something with the numbering of the photo You messed up. Following the cockroach (and before the cicada) - Clytra laeviuscula

04.02.2011 13:58, akulich-sibiria

on the 3rd I have doubts, there should be a lot of such green ones, the main signs pointing to Cryptocephalus sericeus are not visible
Likes: 1

04.02.2011 15:28, Jaguar paw

2) Yes, Purpuricenus sp.
Something with the numbering of the photo you messed up. After the cockroach (and before the cicada) - Clytra laeviuscula

Yes, I fixed it smile.gif
Thank smile.gifyou

04.02.2011 17:54, косинус

"What is the current fashion for yellow labels????=))
It looks cool. "
I already wrote about this - a personal quirk for the convenience of work
, but what about the beetles? weep.gif
or by what book they can be identified, it is better for all Kazakhstan beetles, otherwise I still have Blaps from there "hung" wall.gif


I'm worse than zero in them =)) You can try to identify coleoptera DV. And there is no fauna of the USSR on them???, if there is, you can see it there. Yes, and there is also a good site about ground beetles where you can determine by photos. (sorry I don't remember the address, but you can see it on the net)

04.02.2011 21:31, AGG

I'm worse than zero in them =)) You can try to identify coleoptera DV. And there is no fauna of the USSR on them???, if there is, you can see it there. Yes, and there is also a good site about ground beetles where you can determine by photos. (sorry I don't remember the address, but you can see it on the net)


according to the DV determinant, they are still in no way. a lot of people are tormenting these (beetles) poor fellows, but no one can determine frown.gifin the definition of Karabusov hung up-for 2 days without an answer weep.gif

This post was edited by AGG-02/04/2011 22: 04

04.02.2011 21:36, Mantispid

The aphodium I posted on 02.02.2011 turned
out to be Aphodius (Amidorus) zangi A. Schmidt, 1906
Thanks to A. Kovalev (fornax13) and O. Novikov, a group specialist, for defining it!
Likes: 1

04.02.2011 21:36, Вишняков Алексей

Uzbekistan, Navoi region, center. Kyzylkum, 28.04.09
On the left presumably Menecleonus anxius (18 mm). Same view on the right? If not, please help me determine it.

Pictures:
image: ____334. png
____334. png — (448.14 k)

04.02.2011 21:39, scarabaeinae

help identify onita and a pair of heliocopris from Kenya

This post was edited by scarabaeinae - 04.02.2011 21: 40

Pictures:
picture: CIMG9830.JPG
CIMG9830.JPG — (204.53к)

picture: CIMG9831.JPG
CIMG9831.JPG — (272.27к)

04.02.2011 21:53, Mantispid

Uzbekistan, Navoi region, center. Kyzylkum, 28.04.09
On the left presumably Menecleonus anxius (18 mm). Same view on the right? If not, please help me determine it.

I think you are right, both beetles are Menecleonus anxius, in any case, the left one is exactly right!

04.02.2011 21:55, Andrey.A.

Heliocopris anadematus (Gillet, 1908)
Likes: 1

04.02.2011 22:01, AGG

The aphodium I posted on 02.02.2011 turned
out to be Aphodius (Amidorus) zangi A. Schmidt, 1906
Thanks to A. Kovalev (fornax13) and O. Novikov, a group specialist, for defining it!

1-how does it differ?
2-can someone tell me if there are males of fossor without punctuation of the pronotum?

04.02.2011 22:27, Fornax13

To Alexey Vishnyakov:
The one on the left looks more like a battered Leucochromus imperialis. The right one seems to be similar to Menecleonus, but I'm not sure..

To AGG:
Brachinuses are the same-B. hamatus in
the first photo is one Cymindis ?lineata and a pair of C. decora
Lateralis and picta seem to be correct, but I'm not sure about the first one.

1-how does it differ?

Depends on what rolleyes.gif

This post was edited by Fornax13-04.02.2011 22: 33
Likes: 2

05.02.2011 13:36, Arikain

Thank you for identifying the ground beetle, it doesn't have a Russian name? I just met similar ones in the literature, but I don't remember the name, emerald or something...
Sledueshego I, too, then staphylin from Karelia will throw smile.gif.
[attachmentid()=104236]



About the last staphylinid, I'm afraid to make a mistake, but maybe Othius punctulatus

Hello!
I'm already answering a little late, but I couldn't do it earlier because I was in the hospital and didn't have access to a computer.
I apologize for the terrible quality of the photo, I was in a hurry to mix up the photo.
I provide a better option:
picture: SANY2984.JPG
You may be able to dispel your doubts.

Thank you all for your answers about the ground beetle Carabus nemoralis, I looked for it in the book with Karelian insects, where it is named as a Garden ground beetle. However, the Forest ground beetle is also there, only its Latin name is Carabus arcensis.
I looked up this species on the Internet - C. arcensis, it is named as a Field Ground beetle.
In general, it is really difficult to understand. So for one type ( Latin name ) corresponds to several Russian names, and vice versa to one Russian several (Well, at least two) Latin names. Some Russian names have become obsolete over time, changed, and changed to a different type.
I agree, with Latin, of course, much easier.

05.02.2011 23:57, Fornax13

To Arikain:
Othius punctulatus without variants. The closest large species of this genus live in the Caucasus.
Likes: 1

06.02.2011 0:08, Kemist

For Adetkov: The first bronze and the third bronze were determined correctly, and the second was Potosia cuprina.

This post was edited by Kemist-06.02.2011 00: 10
Likes: 1

06.02.2011 0:22, Вишняков Алексей

Uzbekistan, Navoi region, Kyzylkum village, 25.05.10
Presumably chromosomus fisheri. Please correct me if this is incorrect.

Pictures:
image: ____411. png
____411.png — (300.85к)

06.02.2011 10:12, Сергей2011

Help identify the beetles... mol.gif mol.gif mol.gif all collected in the south of the Far East.

Pictures:
picture: 1.JPG
1.JPG — (202.67к)

picture: 2.JPG
2.JPG — (175.71 k)

picture: 3.JPG
3.JPG — (131.1 k)

picture: 4.JPG
4.JPG — (69.87 k)

picture: 5.JPG
5.JPG — (120.18 k)

picture: 6.JPG
6.JPG — (35.83 k)

06.02.2011 14:00, CosMosk

06.02.2011 14:29, CosMosk

Ukraine, Donetsk region, August.

This post was edited by CosMosk-06.02.2011 14: 31

Pictures:
picture: 082008Donetsk_09.jpg
082008Donetsk_09.jpg — (224.33к)

picture: 082008Donetsk_11.JPG
082008Donetsk_11.JPG — (104.75к)

06.02.2011 15:07, Seneka

6.JPG — (35.83 k) LOOKS LIKE Leiodes

06.02.2011 15:14, KDG

[quote=Jaguar paw,03.02.2011 23:25]
Likes: 1

06.02.2011 15:28, Mantispid

Ukraine, Donetsk region, August.

Rhabdorrhynchus seriegranosus Chevrolat, 1873

Help identify the beetles... mol.gif  mol.gif  mol.gif all collected in the south of the Far East.

5 - Cossonus ?cylindricus Sahlberg, 1835

This post was edited by Mantispid-06.02.2011 15: 32
Likes: 2

06.02.2011 18:32, Fornax13

6.JPG — (35.83 k) looks like Leiodes

6-Liodopria though. There aren't many of them, but I won't lie about the appearance. You never know that one of them lives in the yard.
2 - Misolampidius tentyrioides

This post was edited by Fornax13-06.02.2011 18: 56

08.02.2011 20:51, Mylabris

to AGG^ the first two ground beetles are sort of like Pseudotaphoxenus. To determine the genitals there, you need to pull and blow.
Likes: 1

Pages: 1 ...310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.