E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

About Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and ForumInsects identificationIdentification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42... 854

02.08.2007 16:57, Tyomochkin

damn, I sent the wrong photos! but thanks anyway!

02.08.2007 22:18, Zhernov

With this larva, everything is not so confusing, I definitely think that this is the larva of the Ladybug beetle. But here's how many points confused.gif. I am inclined to Coccinella septempunctata, but I want to hear the opinion of specialists

Pictures:
картинка: ____________________________Coccinellidae__Coccinella_septempunctata_._________________________Coccinellidae..jpg
____________________________Coccinellidae__Coccinella_septempunctata_._________________________Coccinellidae..jpg — (127.18к)

03.08.2007 16:29, Aleksandr Ermakov

Here on nettles-easily. But still, he's probably a little different.

Well, maybe a little. Here is a photo from the morning walk. These are ligustes.

Pictures:
picture: 1.jpg
1.jpg — (157.12к)

Likes: 1

05.08.2007 19:18, Zhernov

Help with the definition. Samara beetle, size 1.3-1.5 cm

Pictures:
picture: 1____.jpg
1____.jpg — (72.76к)

05.08.2007 23:01, Bad Den

Help with the definition. Samara beetle, size 1.3-1.5 cm

Anoplotrupes stercorosus (Hartm. in Scriba, 1791)
Likes: 1

05.08.2007 23:22, Zhernov

Anoplotrupes stercorosus (Hartm. in Scriba, 1791)

Thanks for the definition, but still why not Geotrupes stercorarius. It seems to be more similar to the punctuation of the pronotum?????

05.08.2007 23:43, Bad Den

Thanks for the definition, but still why not Geotrupes stercorarius. It seems to be more similar to the punctuation of the pronotum?????

The size is too small for Geotrupes stercorarius, the sculpture of elytra is also not his, the antennae are again the same...
Likes: 1

06.08.2007 7:46, omar

Well, maybe a little. Here is a photo from the morning walk. These are ligustes.

All right. This is it. smile.gif
Likes: 2

07.08.2007 13:24, Alexander Zarodov

Help me identify a leaf beetle (?). MO, early August.

Pictures:
picture: n0708051.jpg
n0708051.jpg — (90.89к)

07.08.2007 13:29, Bad Den

And what is he sitting on? If not a staged photo, of course.

07.08.2007 13:33, Alexander Zarodov

And what is he sitting on? If not a staged photo, of course.


Good question! I do not remember. Perhaps something like St. John's wort

This post was edited by Double A-07.08.2007 13: 33

07.08.2007 16:49, алекс 2611

Chrysolina hyperici (Forster, 1771) ?

07.08.2007 17:32, Alexander Zarodov

Chrysolina hyperici (Forster, 1771) ?


No, it doesn't look like it:

http://www.biol.uni.wroc.pl/cassidae/Europ...%20hyperici.htm

07.08.2007 20:16, stierlyz

It looks like it, it looks like it! This is from this group of species for sure! But it's not easy to bring up the type and material, and even the photo is unrealistic.

07.08.2007 20:50, Alexander Zarodov

It looks like it, it looks like it! This is from this group of species for sure! But it's not easy to bring up the type and material, and even the photo is unrealistic.


What is Chrysolina sp. I agree, but I would like to get to the view, if possiblesmile.gif, are there really a lot of different purple colors?

What about Chrysolina geminata, for example?

Here's what I found:

Chrysolina geminata Payrtull (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) is another specialist insect whose larvae and adults feed on Hypericum (Duffey and Pasteels 1993)
http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=ge...&page=0135&ct=1

This post was edited by Double A-07.08.2007 21: 35

07.08.2007 22:17, rpanin

What kind of floater? I caught 32 mm
in a puddle today.

This post was edited by rpanin - 07.08.2007 22: 21

Pictures:
picture: IMG_3496.jpg
IMG_3496.jpg — (114.96к)

07.08.2007 23:46, Bad Den

What kind of floater? I caught 32 mm
in a puddle today.

Bottom photo would be...

08.08.2007 10:15, алекс 2611

What is Chrysolina sp. I agree, but I would like to get to the view, if possiblesmile.gif, are there really a lot of different purple colors?

What about Chrysolina geminata, for example?



On St. John's wort, I caught several types of Chrysolina. It is also difficult to say anything about the color scheme. Both Ch. hyperici and, for example, Ch. variants are so diverse in color...
About Ch. geminata: yes, I've only seen this color, but hyperici differs from geminata by having double rows of dots. The photo is very similar. However, I'm just learning about leaf beetles - I may be wrong shuffle.gif
Likes: 1

08.08.2007 10:56, Alexander Zarodov

On St. John's wort, I caught several types of Chrysolina. It is also difficult to say anything about the color scheme. Both Ch. hyperici and, for example, Ch. variants are so diverse in color...
About Ch. geminata: yes, I've only seen this color, but hyperici differs from geminata by having double rows of dots. The photo is very similar. However, I'm just learning about leaf beetles - I might be wrong shuffle.gif


And in geminata, too, double rows of dots are visible with smaller ones between the rows.
http://www.biol.uni.wroc.pl/cassidae/Europ...%20geminata.htm

Ch. hyperici in the photos, mostly with a bronze tint, although there are certainly variations, up to black.

I'm somehow closer to Ch. geminata smile.gif

08.08.2007 11:36, rpanin

Bottom photo would be...

All right, we'll run away in the evening.
All the views are so similar, according to this link.
http://www.entomo.pl/coleoptera/wodne/foto_wodne.php

08.08.2007 11:48, Bad Den

All right, we'll run away in the evening.
All the views are so similar, according to this link.
http://www.entomo.pl/coleoptera/wodne/foto_wodne.php

That's why you need a photo from below - the shape of the processes of the rear basins can be distinguished quite confidently.
I also advise you to look at the web version of the Guide to Water Beetles of Russia -
http://www.zin.ru/animalia/coleoptera/rus/hydrkey5.htm
Likes: 1

09.08.2007 15:28, rpanin

That's why you need a photo from below - the shape of the processes of the rear basins can be distinguished quite confidently.


This post was edited by rpanin - 09.08.2007 15: 29

Pictures:
picture: IMG_3505.jpg
IMG_3505.jpg — (133.35к)

10.08.2007 16:35, Nilson

Colleagues, tell me, pzh., what kind of horses. Somehow I got confused in the definition. There is a suspicion that one is soluta, the other sahlbergi.
May-June, 2007. Orenburg region, roc. Sol-Iletsk

Pictures:
picture: C_soluta2_dors.JPG
C_soluta2_dors.JPG — (107.74к)

picture: C_soluta2_ventr.JPG
C_soluta2_ventr.JPG — (106.66к)

picture: C_sahlbergi2_dors.JPG
C_sahlbergi2_dors.JPG — (121.1к)

picture: C_sahlbergi2_ventr.JPG
C_sahlbergi2_ventr.JPG — (113.78к)

11.08.2007 1:10, Bad Den

rpanin-female Dytiscus marginalis

This post was edited by Bad Den - 08/11/2007 11: 19
Likes: 1

11.08.2007 14:27, Archypus

Nilson-Caught both of them. 2nd most likely sahlbergi, no options. 1st on soluta, which I saw is not very similar-too wide bandages, and in my opinion it does not go so far to the east, though... for the solute, a reliable sign that distinguishes it from the hybrid group is the presence on the shoulders of the elytra of a bunch of up-sticking hairs, clearly visible even at a small magnification. A larger and more massive mount. Do you have any hairs?

11.08.2007 14:43, Nilson

Nilson-Caught both of them. 2nd most likely sahlbergi, no options. 1st on soluta, which I saw is not very similar-too wide bandages, and in my opinion it does not go so far to the east, though... for the solute, a reliable sign that distinguishes it from the hybrid group is the presence on the shoulders of the elytra of a bunch of upturned hairs, clearly visible even at a small magnification. A larger and more massive mount. Do you have any hairs?

Thanks!
The fact of the matter is that there are hairs. They seem to be slightly visible in the photo and are just confusing, since the soluta along Kryzhanovsky goes east to the Don - You are right. Here.

This post was edited by Nilson - 08/11/2007 16: 15

11.08.2007 17:19, stierlyz

As for leaf eaters, don't be under any illusions, the species of this group are determined only by aedeagus. And variations - for the fact that it is colored as you like, but it is not confused with anyone, since there are no similar species.

12.08.2007 2:24, Fornax13

Dear colleagues! Chrysolina, in my opinion, is still geminata (Paykull). The punctuation between rows is rough and frequent, and even in the rows, the dots are close together, as far as the photo shows. And this color is quite typical for geminata. In Ch. hyperici (Forster), both the row points are sparser and the row spacing is more delicately dotted. In addition, it is often bronze or copper-green. As for Ch. variants (Schaller), it generally has a dotted ndcr. tangled, without rows. And he's different. Although to be sure, you can also pull the aedeagus if it is a male, of coursewink.gif
Likes: 1

12.08.2007 19:06, Ilia Ustiantcev

What kind of bug? Moscow.
image: ___. jpg

12.08.2007 22:17, Bad Den

2 Ilya U:
Harpalus (Pseudophonus) rufipes
Likes: 1

12.08.2007 23:53, Fornax13

Colleagues, can you tell me what kind of Bambi, and even before the subgenus I don't know. From the lake. Baskunchak. Something very interesting, in my opinion. Apparently, it was not specified for the Northern Volga region. The photo, however, is so-so..

Pictures:
picture: Bembidion2.jpg
Bembidion2.jpg — (130к)

13.08.2007 9:20, omar

Identifying Bambi from a photo is not a productive activity. Look at Isaev, there are adequate keys for the Volga region.
Likes: 1

13.08.2007 11:49, Alexander Zarodov

Help identify the elephant! Moscow Region, August 12.

Pictures:
picture: n0708121.jpg
n0708121.jpg — (145.97к)

13.08.2007 13:09, omar

Larinus sp.
Likes: 1

13.08.2007 21:27, Archypus

Thanks!
The fact of the matter is that there are hairs. They seem to be slightly visible in the photo and are just confusing, since the soluta along Kryzhanovsky goes east to the Don - You are right. Here.

It goes to the Volga River, but it is not known from the left bank. The hairs are really noticeable - very interesting. But, once again, it doesn't look like a typical soluta. In what biotope is it caught? For solyuta, these are sandy manes in pine forests...
Likes: 1

13.08.2007 21:37, Nilson

It goes to the Volga River, but it is not known from the left bank. The hairs are really noticeable - very interesting. But, once again, it doesn't look like a typical soluta. In what biotope is it caught? For solyuta, these are sandy manes in pine forests...

I can't say for sure right now. The beetle was caught by R. Filimonov. I don't think he mentioned the pine forests.

13.08.2007 22:54, mikee

Number 1-they came to the light en masse. Number 2-crawled into the light. Beetles, help for general education, who are they? Photos certainly don't shine :- (

13.08.2007 23:42, Fornax13

Today's Larinus is turbinatus Gyllenhal, 1836. His gtr. is slightly conical.

And ground beetles that are born: 1-similar to Harpalus rufipes (Degeer), only pubescent ndkr. not visible. If it was expressed for a length of 11-16 mm, then it is exactly it. If it is smaller (9-12), it is more likely to be H. griseus (Panzer). 2-Broscus cephalotes (Linnaeus), only, to be honest, I have never seen broscus crawl into the light...
Likes: 2

13.08.2007 23:46, Fornax13

I've tried Bambi before. Ulyanovsk (and Samara) region is still not Astrakhan. I represent our Ulyanovsk Bambi. Yes, and in the receipt for the Lower level. The Volga region is not enough "not ours". And then they are different. Here, apparently, it is necessary to look at materials on the Black Sea and Azov regions. Or look for Netolitsky. But thanks anyway!

15.08.2007 12:02, phlomis

What are the Staphylinidae? Moscow region, 07.2007. I have a full pot in my hand...picture: ins_1a.jpg

Pictures:
picture: ins_1b.jpg
ins_1b.jpg — (88.87к)

picture: ins_1c.jpg
ins_1c.jpg — (84.57к)

Pages: 1 ...34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.