Insecta.pro → Catalog Gallery Taxonomy References Maps Community More

✖

Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54... 854

17.10.2007 8:15, Mylabris

Malashka in the photo - no more than Malachius sp.
10-Chrysolina (violacea?)
12 - Coccinula quatuordecimpunctata?
15 - Nicrophorus (vespillo?)
A lot of things have a question mark because they are still photos, and you can't turn them around...

Likes: 2

17.10.2007 9:38, omar

Gentlemen, For everyone and for the Ripper in particular! If I write without phrases like "most likely", "it looks like", "probably" - this means I'm not writing in vain, so I'm 100% sure of what I'm writing.
Sincerely, always your omar.

17.10.2007 17:45, rpanin

Here, I'm completely confused .Who is it?
Size 8 mm. On oak logs. End of May this year.

Pictures:
picture: IMG_3917.jpg

IMG_3917.jpg — (107.32к)

17.10.2007 20:12, RippeR

Leiopus nebulosus

Likes: 1

17.10.2007 21:34, rpanin

Leiopus nebulosus

RippeR thank you. And I dry my head. This little thing is so similar.
It is necessary to make a new theme by Lamiinae

17.10.2007 23:52, Fornax13

Thank you all for the definition!
Left unidentified:
6-bombardier-genus Brachinus if memory serves, the species cannot be identified?
10,12,15 - at least it won't work up to the genus?
to omar:
what about Malashka? Latin give, pliz!
Leafhopper 11, unfortunately, there is no better photo, otherwise I would not have confused you with this one )

6 - I like it better as Brachinus psophia Serv. Can you tell me the size? And preferably the color of the belly

10-Chrysolina violacea, only now called, I think, Ch. sturmi
11-Cryptocephalus anticus Suffr. (= octacosmus Bedel)
12-so is this quatuordecimpunctata
15-judging by the crooked legs-really N. vespillo L.

Likes: 3

18.10.2007 17:38, Mikhail F. Bagaturov

Sorry for your silence, business...
Znachitsa so.
I apologize for the confusion that was caused by me... the old one has become quite old.
On the photo 2.jpg and 3.jpg it turned out to be a team from the Caucasus-the upper rows and the Crimea (from the middle, starting with the transverse gilenhals and the row below).
Sorry again.

And here is a little more Caucasus (Novomikhailovka).
What kind of carabs (mostly guess, but still...)?
Thanks!

Pictures:
picture: K1.JPG

K1.JPG — (86.44к)

picture: K2.JPG

K2.JPG — (135.77к)

picture: K3.JPG

K3.JPG — (94.16к)

picture: K4.JPG

K4.JPG — (86.59к)

picture: K5.JPG

K5.JPG — (78.99к)

picture: K6.JPG

K6.JPG — (92.07к)

picture: K7.JPG

K7.JPG — (79.62к)

picture: K8.JPG

K8.JPG — (137.61 k)

picture: K9.JPG

K9.JPG — (77.06к)

18.10.2007 17:52, Mikhail F. Bagaturov

RippeR thank you. And I dry my head. This little thing is so similar.
Need a new theme to do on Lamiinae

Personally, I would not be so sure that this is definitely nebulosis. Femoratus is also quite possible - they seem to meet sympatrically there, but I won't say, because you need to see the structure of the covers clearly, but maybe the doctor will tell you for sure.

18.10.2007 21:06, Nilson

Most of the dark archiplectes are IMHO A. reitteri, and the smooth colored ones-I can't say, are similar to A. starkianus ssp., then-Megodontus ?exaratus (or septemcarinatus), Sphodristocarabus adamsi (although maybe janthinus-you need to watch), R. fasciculatum and M. verecundus-it's clear, then-I pass.

18.10.2007 21:31, Aleksey Adamov

6 - I like it better as Brachinus psophia Serv. Can you tell me the size? And preferably the color of the belly

Brachinus-and it's probably impossible to determine. Judging by the photo, he was released and is now dying of old age (or has already died)

And according to this photo, I would not have reskul determine.

18.10.2007 22:01, KDG

Personally, I would not be so sure that this is definitely nebulosis. Femoratus is also quite possible - they seem to meet sympatrically there, but I won't say, because you need to see the structure of the covers clearly, but maybe the doctor will tell you for sure.

These reptiles really gather on the same tree. but the picture shows the nominative nebulosus.

Likes: 3

18.10.2007 22:27, KDG

18.10.2007 23:02, Fornax13

Brachinus-and it's probably impossible to determine. Judging by the photo, he was released and is now dying of old age (or has already died)
And according to this photo, I would not have reskul determine.

Maybe, but I don't think the belly is black (at least not the one that sticks

out ). And in terms of body proportions, it gives the impression of being quite small. But I may be wrong, of course..

18.10.2007 23:03, Bad Den

hefty tribax, apparently konstantinovi.

Which one exactly?

18.10.2007 23:28, KDG

Which one exactly?

on K2, at the bottom I hide.

Likes: 2

18.10.2007 23:31, KDG

I'll throw up a few beetles, too...
For Mylabris, mostly..

Pictures:
picture: P1020710.jpg

P1020710.jpg — (133.78к)

picture: P1020714.jpg

P1020714.jpg — (137.87к)

picture: P1020739.JPG

P1020739.JPG — (138.05к)

18.10.2007 23:58, Fornax13

I'm sorry, but where do these fees come from?
On the first mattress - a series, I think, Alosimus collaris, if it is now called that.

19.10.2007 7:42, Mylabris

I think that the upper one is the south of Russia, the other two are Central Asia (the last one I would even assume is Uzbekistan or Tajikistan - it's very Teratolytta tempting....)

19.10.2007 7:57, Сергей-Д

I don't do beetles, so I didn't take a scorer. Yes, it's small, but I thought they were all small ) Photo taken in early spring, in the ground excavated. Next time, if possible, I will photograph all the interesting beetles in several angles, and catch ground beetles.

Likes: 1

19.10.2007 10:47, Aleksey Adamov

Maybe, but I don't think the belly is black (at least not the one that sticks out ). And in terms of body proportions, it gives the impression of being quite small. But I may be wrong, of course..

I very rarely focus on the size of the body of brachinuses, when determining. I have massive collections of B. crepitans of gigantic sizes, not at all those indicated in the Kryzhanovsky determinant for the entire genus (presented in the determinant). And then, B. psophia it or B. elegans will show well only genetaly.

Likes: 1

19.10.2007 11:18, Mikhail F. Bagaturov

Judging by the sawyere, it looks like Talysh.

19.10.2007 11:20, Mikhail F. Bagaturov

Hi!

hefty tribax, apparently konstantinovi.

Yes, komrad, that's how it was defined.
And who are the blue and green archplects?

The post was edited by mikepride - 19.10.2007 11: 21

19.10.2007 19:37, RippeR

KDG and mikepride:
Are you trying to drive us to suicide? Such charges on mattresses are contraindicated to spread, only slowly, according to 1 type. My neighbors are already complaining that I'm flooding them, and there's no stopping the flow of drool

I assume that the elephants are Larinus latus
In the last photo, next to the meloid-exocentrus adspersus?

And, in general, the eyes run away, and refuse to run back, you are not humane

Likes: 3

19.10.2007 21:38, KDG

I'm sorry, but where do these fees come from?
On the first mattress - a series, I think, Alosimus collaris, if it is now called that.

comrades, I apologize wildly - this is Talysh. Milabris and alozymus from the Zuvand steppe, Lytta-near Lenkoran.

19.10.2007 21:40, KDG

Likes: 1

19.10.2007 21:47, KDG

KDG and mikepride:
Are you trying to drive us to suicide? Such charges on mattresses are contraindicated to spread, only slowly, according to 1 type. My neighbors are already complaining that I'm flooding them, and there's no stopping the flow of drool

I assume that the elephants are Larinus latus
In the last photo, next to the meloid-exocentrus adspersus?

And, in general, the eyes run away, and refuse to run back, you are not humane

Be strong, sir, trials harden your character.

About beetles: Larinus - the size of latus did not come out... 2.5 cm
barbel-Leiopus kharazii Holz.

19.10.2007 22:12, алекс 2611

11 - Cryptocephalus anticus Suffr. (= octacosmus Bedel).

I'm confused... I thought Cryptocephalus anticus Suffr. and Cryptocephalus octacosmus Bedel are different species. The photo seems to be a typical octacosmus, you can mix up the figs. I found only one synonym for it - Cryptocephalus sexpustulatus Rossi, 1790

19.10.2007 22:35, Aleksey Adamov

Defined brachinus as Brachinus hamatus Fisch.,:
picture: P1070960.JPG

But on ZINA's website, http://www.zin.ru/Animalia/Coleoptera/rus/brahamkg.htm the photo, in my opinion, is a little different:
picture: Brachinus_hamatus.jpg

Do I have hamatus or not?

Likes: 1

19.10.2007 22:55, Bad Den

In the photo from the Zinovsky site, the beetle, in my opinion, is slightly "killed".... So it may well be that it has a not very characteristic appearance.

19.10.2007 23:04, omar

Grebennikov's photos are all very low quality. You can't understand a damn thing

from them

Likes: 2

19.10.2007 23:35, Fornax13

Do I have hamatus or not?

Very similar, anyway. In addition, the view is changeable: I have copies from one point. almost without a metallic ebb, there are almost reduced shoulder spots, there are b.m. typical. I don't say anything about the dimensions at all.

19.10.2007 23:47, Bad Den

I can't help myself either - who can help me with anything

July 2007, Tanzania, Uluguru Mountains -
also there, but up to the maximum rod.

user posted image

This post was edited by Bad Den - 10/20/2007 12: 47

19.10.2007 23:49, Fornax13

I'm confused... I thought Cryptocephalus anticus Suffr. and Cryptocephalus octacosmus Bedel are different species. The photo seems to be a typical octacosmus, you can mix up the figs. I found only one synonym for it - Cryptocephalus sexpustulatus Rossi, 1790

Yeah... There's something I don't understand now... I gave a synonym for Alexey Yuryevich Isaev. He has both Lopatin and Dovgailo (2002). And the types are really different. It's all very strange...

This post was edited by Fornax13-20.10.2007 00: 04

20.10.2007 0:13, Nimrod

Likes: 1

20.10.2007 0:19, Bad Den

Dear Mr. Nimrod,
Thanks!
Copris, I assume, is of 2 types here?
Do you have any articles on this region?
And/or, if you are interested, I can send you beetles.

This post was edited by Bad Den-10/20/2007 00: 25

20.10.2007 0:28, Nimrod

Something, like, there is. I need to see it. And so, in general, I would not refuse, if it is not a pity. Especially interesting are Leucocellis and other types of bronzes, if any....
Sincerely,...

20.10.2007 0:30, Bad Den

Something, like, there is. I need to see it. And so, in general, I would not refuse, if it is not a pity. Especially interesting are Leucocellis and other types of bronzes, if any....
Sincerely,...

Not a pity

On the trail. I'll send it to you in a week.

Likes: 1

20.10.2007 16:46, Ilia Ustiantcev

Is it Hippodamia tredecimpunctata? Moscow.
picture: ___________.jpg

20.10.2007 21:53, Fornax13

Is it Hippodamia tredecimpunctata? Moscow.

It is the most

Likes: 1

20.10.2007 22:06, Aleksey Adamov

Help me figure it out!
Identified brachinus as sclopeta, but in the list of beetles. There is no Russia of this type, and I forgot to scan the last pages of the checklist, so I don't have any synonym data. What happened to this species (sclopeta)? And who does the brachinus look like in the photo?
However, the photo is not particularly high-quality... "I don't have time to work with beetles yet.
picture: sclopeta1.jpg

Pages: 1 ...46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54... 854

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

News

17.11.2024: Импортированы и переведны последние свежие сообщения с форума. Обновлена страница «О сайте».
11.11.2024: The Community/Forum section has become more convenient
11.11.2024: Improved scaling of images in the Forum/Community