Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of beetles (Coleoptera)

Pages: 1 ...51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59... 854

Likes: 7

Likes: 1

Likes: 2

Likes: 4

Likes: 1

26.11.2007 17:09, KDG

Dear KDG, I will not hide the fact that recently I have greatly expanded the range of my acquaintances, primarily in the entomological field. Although I think you've already figured that out. However, a large tidbit remained not yet covered - the personal office. But my powers will reach him, too. In fact, in my new chair, I became an advanced amateur, from a very modest and pathetic one. Frequent foreign business trips of my colleagues at work "across the river" also significantly untie my hands. So it was this time. If you don't already have this book, I can provide it for you. Send it to where? I think the opportunity will appear in a week or two. When it will reach you, I don't know, but expedited parcels (on Budden's advice) go, as practice has shown, no more than a week, even to the Far East (Dina will not let you lie). So get the book in a month at most, most likely. From where? How? for now, I will modestly keep silent. On this end stupid flood. I will delete this message after you read it.

Don't be nervous.. I have the book, thank you for offering to help. I assumed that you had written critical notes on it somewhere, and I wanted to read them. And everything.
As for the Moscow list, as far as I remember (there is no article in front of my eyes), there were indicated finds considered doubtful with an indication of the fact of doubtfulness. As for other comments about the work of M. L., it is better to make them being well acquainted with the work process and well versed in the group. You yourself reproached the comrade Cerambyx for arguing with you about some darkling without being an expert on Tenebrionidae....

Likes: 1