Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Community and Forum → Insects identification → Identification of Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths)

Pages: 1 ...661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669... 986

Likes: 1

27.06.2015 15:46, коты

Many types are common. The most interesting butterfly is the extreme right one in the bottom row.
Axia olga (Staudinger, 1899)
The only representative of the family in Russia.

Thank you, but if many types are common, then write about them if you do not mind

I will be very grateful. I don't know much about nighters. And in the school atlas-determinant of butterflies M. P. Cornelio, which I use to determine the night, I did not find these. Maybe of course they are there, but they are drawn and many are visually very difficult to determine. For example, Ematurga atomaria, which is completely different from itself in this determinant. And this butterfly, which you liked, I caught high in the mountains, on the Aibga (H=2200m) in 2013.

27.06.2015 17:04, Andrey Bezborodkin

Thank you, but if many types are common, then write about them if you do not mind I will be very grateful. I don't know much about nighters. And in the school atlas-determinant of butterflies M. P. Cornelio, which I use to determine the night, I did not find these. Maybe of course they are there, but they are drawn and many are visually very difficult to determine. For example, Ematurga atomaria, which is completely different from itself in this determinant.

Let's do this. Here is a link to the first butterfly:
http://insectamo.ru/hete/98-hete/noctuidae...anobia-oleracea
On the same site, you will find most of the others from your photo, but Sochi is further south, so you may not find some of them. Ask them again, and they won't have to write a whole list in Latin.

Likes: 1

28.06.2015 14:22, Andrey Bezborodkin

1. Arctium is still a Burdock. "that's the first one.
2. This is the second one. What does the client want TO DETERMINE????777-BURDOCK which occupies 99.9929% of the area in the frame, or cag bae Butterfly which is only 0.0071% in the frame ???7 - calculated specifically. http://molbiol.ru/forums/uploads/post-1088761-1435449457.jpg
Ask yourself the same question - Do your customers respect you in this case? - If in 24 inches of the monitor - you need to either scale the "tapestry" or view it using the P O T O M U H T O O N N E V L E Z A E T engine.
Thank you.

I agree, such a frame for determining the butterfly, and even Sakhalin, is not suitable. It is more suitable for the general topic of Sakhalin. But it should be borne in mind that not every butterfly will pose in the field, moths are generally shy. As for asking yourself - this is how I define it through the ZIN if necessary, and, of course, I try to make a clear "macro"photo of the straightened copy for this purpose. But not everyone straightens out, like the author of these pictures, and it is not always possible to make an approximation when shooting.

Likes: 1