Insecta.pro Community
Pages: 1 ...108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116... 145
Dmitry, anything to say or leave it like this?
Dmitry, I added the genus but the species. Would you do that along with the source?
To go.
Moved.
Moved.
Uh-huh, right, thanks. Vlad Proklov confirmed the identifying.
In fact, it would be better to have curius ;--) Will see what the author says...
Ok, the person who identified is changed.
Moved to pamphilus as well as the photo http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/9880/.
Ok, goes to pamphilus.
To pamphilus, "uncertain", or?
People, approve or...
Dmitry, what's about your checking?)) Any conclusions?
Ok, moved.
Generally, yes. People often wondered exactly MO. But for this infa need centralized. For by region out of the blue, you can take, for example. And Defense to and micro was ... Otkel reliable?
Andrey, seems you made a mistake while uploading?
Now preparing to update the entire database, there will be a qualified distribution. Now infa in the "Distribution" is listed only for Europe.
Uh-huh, deleted.
Sergey, thanks. The photo goes to O. sieversii.
I've got Andrey's mails in a normal way (using Kaspersky antivirus).
Ok, moved.
Bah. At least, drifting isn't one-way ))
Now I bear. But in general, Andrew, I remind you that similar infu correct post in the comments to fotam and not to the species.
The background is stunning.
The Lion Kuing, naturally.
Thanks, photo moved to C. lacunana. Will be added to Syricoris genus as the database is updated as usual.
Thanks. Moved to "undetermined".
Thanks for the remark.
Thanks, moved to D. elpenor.
So what, people, to "uncertain" or not yet?
To males.
Moved to males.
To males.
Goes to males.
Went to males.
To males.
Moved to males.
Went to males.
A car advert...
Alien...
Goes to.
Moved.
Moved.
Moved.
Should get changed?
Once more!)
What a meh)) Attempt number 2)
Sergey, this item is boiled or not?
Alexandr, I moved comments to the species there, at the species photo page.
Goes to M. brassicae.
Next page