Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396... 628

29.10.2014 9:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #34703

Alexander, cook something wingless females (at least ours) and it is not necessary: they are all good in appearance vary))) And if cooking is then a matter of her and stabbing is not necessary, and a wool. You're right: it was like a beetle. Pinned her to the pin: in time all the seams will die .... On the way and cruise mount (micro).A matter of taste, in short)))

29.10.2014 8:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #23996

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

29.10.2014 8:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #23995

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

29.10.2014 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16450

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

29.10.2014 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #14697

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

29.10.2014 8:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #7483

Corrected data. Imago → Male & female.

29.10.2014 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3803

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

29.10.2014 8:45, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #16451

Corrected data. Imago → Female.

28.10.2014 19:13, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Ourapteryx

Already there :) In general, for such issues is a separate issue: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/18428 and ask them better there.

28.10.2014 14:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34679

Corrected data. Bhutanitis yulongensis / Alex Dumchus → Bhutanitis mansfieldi / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2014 13:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34678

Corrected data. Bhutanitis yulongensis / Alex Dumchus → Bhutanitis mansfieldi / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2014 12:42, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on Lycaena violacea

Celastrina ladon (Cramer, [1780]), but in any case, not Lycaena violacea. someone, something messed up synonyms.

28.10.2014 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34669

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

28.10.2014 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34670

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

28.10.2014 12:22, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34578

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

28.10.2014 11:30, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #30172

Corrected data. Not identified → Eupithecia satyrata / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

28.10.2014 10:58, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34686

Of the two prelozhenie, I choose Speyeria coronis.

28.10.2014 10:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on Inope heterogyna

Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Palaearctic. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July.

28.10.2014 8:28, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34681

Corrected data. Nyctemera kinibalina → Utetheisa abraxoides.

28.10.2014 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33650

Nothing more to do with it is not necessary - it is in his place.

28.10.2014 6:31, Alexander Belousov: comment on Dichagyris orientis

Peter brought to the "ideal". Extra subspecies on this page still have! D. o. pseudosignifera (Boursin, 1952). D. o. pseudosignifera (Boursin, 1952). D. o. pygmaea (Hampson, 1903). D. o. pygmaea (Hampson, 1903). And then you can clean up and comments.

27.10.2014 22:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34566

Corrected data. Not identified → Narope minor / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

27.10.2014 22:16, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34558

Corrected data. Not identified → Narope minor / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

27.10.2014 22:15, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34573

Corrected data. Not identified → Narope minor / Confidently identified / Shirley Sekarajasingham.

27.10.2014 22:15, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #6084

Whose will ?!

27.10.2014 22:14, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34654

Where the label? (looking sternly.)

27.10.2014 22:04, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #29177

Corrected data. Not identified → Erinnyis obscura / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

27.10.2014 21:51, Alex Dumchus: comment on photo #24120

In females Duphia quite thin mustache. Well, still, of course, the author of the artistic efforts of color. Look D.avia and D.fraterna

27.10.2014 20:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33267

Marumba sperchius?

27.10.2014 18:13, Bad Den: comment on Stereomicroscope

Zdravtsvuyte why stereomicroscopes are not entered in Gosreetsr SI?This question can most likely be answered in Gosreetsre SI

27.10.2014 17:52, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #25813

Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #32746

Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:51, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #32747

Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:50, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #24496

Corrected data.

27.10.2014 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34676

Corrected data. Not identified / Imago → Seokia pratti / Confidently identified / Male / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 17:48, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34674

Corrected data. Not identified → Pieris dulcinea / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 17:47, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34675

Corrected data. Not identified → Araschnia burejana / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 17:46, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #34677

Corrected data. Not identified → Ochlodes subhyalina / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

27.10.2014 14:24, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31576

Corrected data. Not identified → Idaea nitidata / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.10.2014 13:49, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #31365

Corrected data. Not identified → Scopula pudicaria / Confidently identified / Yuri Semejkin.

27.10.2014 11:24, Irina Nikulina: comment on photo #16403

Well, thank you for the good advice, Peter! How had not guessed, because very friendly terms with the English)) .. Load - and a very different result, much clearer)

27.10.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #29934

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

27.10.2014 11:02, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #29985

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

27.10.2014 10:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #34662

In the comments to mean - a source of information about more adequate title and this is the name. Then I bear.

27.10.2014 10:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Ypthima argus

http://eol.org/pages/149296/names/synonyms http://www.nic.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/ypthima/ Even if you leave Ypthima argus, the views are not described (Fabricius, 1775) !!! and Butler, 1878 Fabricius described Papilio baldus Fabricius, 1775. I do not know what motivated the team blue.