E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Illustrations for all the butterflies of Russia

Community and ForumWebsite news and updatesIllustrations for all the butterflies of Russia

Peter Khramov, 16.05.2015 5:19

I propose to close up a reference group, which will be for everyone, or almost every kind of a nice set of illustrations and formal features, so that you can out of it was not just zababahat catalog and directory-determinant.To be able to enjoy the show and people - out, they say, how can it work, then other groups will be easier to collect the Old together with the people. If you share and approve of, let podnapryazhemsya and add illustrations and signs for it.Who has infa - spread it with a priority for those species for which it is not yet on the site (especially the illustration). If you do not have pictures, but you know who has an acquaintance - poagitiruyte to posted. If you just saw on the web - write in the subject reference, I will refer to the authors requesting publication.If we manage to complete section illustrations and formalized signs (luckily, geography, by and large, is already there, and the times during the flight of many), it can turn a good online qualifier. And let's not songs about genitals.Limitations I think everyone understands, but the opportunity to make an adequate sample quickly and accurately will still be extremely useful.
What do you think?

Comments

16.05.2015 5:21, Peter Khramov

ZY As for the pictures, you do not have enough of 125 species. However, it would be good kanesh still different angles and variations.

18.05.2015 20:41, Shamil Murtazin

Peter, come on specifics.
What kind of group is selected as a reference?
What the 125 species? .. To link to query the database on the butterflies of the reference group without illustrations. Type Countdown online.What exactly it is necessary to fill in for them in addition to the photos? (time of flight of, wingspan, distinguishing marks, fodder plant?)
Determinant, it seems to me, implies some kind of tree structure. Where are we going to take it? Well, that is What we take as a basis the determinant?

18.05.2015 23:27, Peter Khramov

http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55 - here's a link to a group of geography, which can be clearly seen, for whom there are illustrations, for whom not. At the top of the total number of species.
http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55&photo=y - here it is the same, but showing only the illustrated species. At the top again, the number is.
I think it first without tolstogolovok, but if I can fight them - better yet, just do them.Also ph primarily need infa about the flight of time, the second - wingspan / length of front wing. But foty important.
With regards to the truck - it would be good not just foty species, but foty all the different options (top / underside, male / female forms, etc.) if they are very different from each other.Strong - it is as a form of levans spring / summer or blues male / female, with some blue and the other brown.
The determinant is not intended tree structure. As a basis we take the Old, which is already in the catalog. Basis - geography (region of Sinev) plus color (but not as it is now, but more appropriately, perhaps, broken down into podpriznaki).Supplement - time volley, size, specification of the taxon (eg, family, if it is obvious).
Ie Here is the link to http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?color[]=10&tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55&rgs[]=10&photo=on worked in full, not just now.

19.05.2015 10:01, Shamil Murtazin

Still, with the flag of "no photo" would be more convenient.

19.05.2015 13:15, Peter Khramov

Did. Now, instead of a flag "picture" has two radiobatona - "picture" and "no pictures".
http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55&photo=y - Only species with photos.
http://lepidoptera.ru/catalog?tx=Papilionoidea&country[]=55&photo=n - Only types without photo.

19.05.2015 17:59, Shamil Murtazin

Super. Radio button interface could not put, that people are not confused - because the technical functionality. I forgot to write)
PhotographyCallophrys butleroviMigranov, 1991 I'll get the same! =)

19.05.2015 18:54, Peter Khramov

Why not, washes be useful feature, people are not so rare in the letters ask, they say, some photons are missing (not for this topic, but in general), it will be easier to view ...

20.05.2015 12:32, Dmitriy Pozhogin

You can then put the list and correct, that it was evident that appears. I probably something will happen if there is not one copper-butterfly and tolstogolovki

20.05.2015 14:09, Peter Khramov

Dim, well above link also has a list of the corrected automatically.

23.05.2015 22:28, Shamil Murtazin

Someone else would have looked, maybe I overlooked that.
Here all the photos exposed butterflies, there are not many (archive photo of 9): https://yadi.sk/d/fUkb3GExgpsXw

24.05.2015 2:19, Peter Khramov

Shamil, who you're talking about?

24.05.2015 12:20, Shamil Murtazin

Peter, you look you too =)
I was referring to species which are not illustrated on the site, but which are on display in our National Museum.

25.05.2015 15:35, Peter Khramov

So I do not understand if your foty, it can be shipped to the site, and if not yours, why view?

25.05.2015 16:12, Shamil Murtazin

Peter, you just look and you will understand everything. There's a photo of boxes with butterflies. If the form is still not illustrated - I can make a photo.

25.05.2015 18:36, Peter Khramov

You mean that there are unknown species? Bo if you know, you do kanesh foty, if possible. And if you do not know - it is necessary to look to citizens who rummage in the subject ...

07.06.2015 21:47, Shamil Murtazin

Left = 138 species)

08.06.2015 18:46, Peter Khramov

We rush Aki night express!

23.06.2015 19:43, Shamil Murtazin

I offer separate from the list species found in only one region. This can be either the edge of the area (and not the fact that the species remains in the region), or endemic.
It makes a real assessment of the situation.

24.06.2015 1:04, Peter Khramov

To assess the situation with what? ..

06.08.2015 21:39, Shamil Murtazin

Hmm ... neillyustrirovannyh species Rhopalocera was 151

06.08.2015 22:05, Peter Khramov

That is progress because progress.

New comment

Note: you should have a Insecta.pro account to upload new topics and comments. Please, create an account or log in to add comments.

* Our website is multilingual. Some comments have been translated from other languages.

Random species of the website catalog

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.