Photo #25131: Acronicta auricoma

04.04.2014 13:53, Peter Khramov

Well, I say, who communicates with Alex, even if only in absentia, why not ask him directly floor business?

04.04.2014 13:23, Alexandr Zhakov

I am in severe cases also turn to Matt, he always consults, and speaks the best option. but only determines the material in hand (in severe cases).

04.04.2014 13:12, Alexandr Zhakov

Basil, you are 100% right about the label, there is the definition of a material that determine the author holds, sees the size of small parts, the lower wing and the opposite direction, when neohodimosti can cook. In the photo is different, with the often expressed the most likely match a particular type. especially in difficult cases. and it is not a definition.Most of the possibility of error, and a good specialist is abhorrent.

04.04.2014 12:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Question do not understand ..... And what of the attributive labels in collections? There, too, in the column det. write only his name no matter who identified? It is not clear ... If a person determines the material means it automatically gives consent to use his name. Without any permit or not.Otherwise, the labels would, in many cases would be wrong.

04.04.2014 10:17, Alexandr Zhakov

The question, agree Does Alex Matt, whatever its definition or assumption of photographs exhibited in the network ?. If you agree, then no problems. And no, then there is no question.

04.04.2014 10:15, Andrey Ponomarev

I've done everything.

04.04.2014 10:01, Peter Khramov

When one or the other case, it is possible to do it any comments, you are right. When put to the definition of a regular one and the same person, then you can zaregatsya, the benefit of such people are very few.

04.04.2014 4:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov

That's what I had in mind: see. Examples are :)
The sentence "the world" online signup only due to determine the drive also not an option.
A field that is offered when loading: "Additional information / remarks.For example, the instance output from the pupa or Determination was carried out on a photo or any other additional information " in my opinion," it is the "for such cases. Moreover, this field is always active in the Old and the LC can be changed.

04.04.2014 1:17, Peter Khramov

Moder may add after geography, and INT field geography. What is not the same thing. Det. if added, the only comment author photo and / or comments to fote on the site, as did Andrew. Both of these options are utilized today, but both are not the same, that define separate field.

03.04.2014 20:54, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well, maybe determined the geography of modernization after the add.
It will look like this: "The Moscow region., Orekhovo-Zuyevo district, pos.Topoliny. Det. Matov A."
Make?

03.04.2014 20:31, Peter Khramov

Well so who Alexei knows, maybe offer him zaregatsya? The authors not necessarily go just to Rega was online, then you can put down in the definition. Not the first time since this situation is already ...

03.04.2014 20:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Andrei, Fill is defined in the author's comments in his LC.
Matov not in the list of authors and therefore it is impossible to set its definition.
For such determinations have to register authorship there :)

03.04.2014 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Acronicta menyanthidis → Acronicta auricoma.

03.04.2014 19:44, Andrey Ponomarev

It also Acronicta auricoma, identified Alexey mats.