Photo #23665: Marumba sperchius

29.10.2013 11:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Not identified → Marumba sperchius / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus.

28.10.2013 18:24, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Your opinion and your future developments I have absolutely no interest

28.10.2013 16:49, Sergei Kotov

"And I do not understand why I can and need to trust in the tropical issues?"
Yeah, so, you can not be trusted! Uchtu future.

28.10.2013 14:53, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Sergei Kotov! Of course, I do not know what is your relationship with Basil, but from your post 11:52 jarred me somehow! I do not know and do not understand why I can and need to trust in tropical questions? First Basil can have your opinion, as the moderators, and secondly he can check this kind, and the third can, but you never know what else might be ....

28.10.2013 12:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I confess, could not see. Tomorrow bear (currently once). At work, I am writing from the phone.

28.10.2013 11:52, Sergei Kotov

Vasily, are you totally blind or what? Right, Alexandr Dumchus' ID is accompanied with a question mark. But later Dmitry Pozhogin decidedly confirmed that ID pressing "This species is identified correctly."??? As I see, we may and should rely on him in "tropical" cases. Don't you? Or have you got blind and didn't see the second message right after your favourite question mark?

28.10.2013 5:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov

The question mark is not visible?

28.10.2013 3:14, Sergei Kotov

Reminder moderators. This butterfly has long been determined. Move right.

24.10.2013 15:14, Dmitriy Pozhogin This species is identified correctly.

22.09.2013 20:14, Alex Dumchus

Marumba sperchius, (Ménétriés, 1857)?