Photo #27642: Lepidoptera sp.

17.02.2014 19:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well, where shall I go from here :) It's just nerves play tricks on all recently dissolved concoctions (and not only from her). Very poor become: old probably ... :( After the site is already almost five years and I already can not live without it :)

16.02.2014 21:28, Alexandr Zhakov

Vasily, do not be disappointed if I did not pick Sinev people, material and would publish a directory, used up to now, have wondered what where, and how we interpret this or that kind, according to the Japanese or the Europeans. And now everything is blue, according to the Russian system.:) Yes, there are drawbacks, now only to supplement and correct, but is now working on the same basis. :)

16.02.2014 21:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I'm in the blue 2008 very pazocharovyvayus lately: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/research/projects/lepindex/search/detail.dsml?TaxonNo=261372

16.02.2014 20:52, Irina Nikulina

1. Use Triaena, because It provides links to Yap. sites where race Triaena. The brackets and pointed valid name. 2. We focus on Sinev, and Sinev (resp. Here) intermedia - a separate species. 3. I thought it closer to the intermedia, cuspis gave the second var-t. Perhaps mistaken both.

16.02.2014 20:43, Alexandr Zhakov

Basil, but not cuspis it, now try to determine at Kononenko. Basil, it is not necessary to give the European ET types links, they do not always work. :) And Acronicta kind of complicated, sometimes only the gene. Truly, I say :)

16.02.2014 20:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Why did not she? Reasons?

16.02.2014 20:34, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Acronicta cuspis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina → Not identified.

16.02.2014 19:16, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Not identified → Acronicta cuspis / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

16.02.2014 19:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov

However, Cho is I cuspis, of course: http://www.lepiforum.de/lepiwiki.pl?Acronicta_Cuspis
I bear :)

16.02.2014 19:05, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Irina, you should not use the generic name Triaena (it's the Japanese and they write all characters) :) validity Acronicta. Regarding intermedia: she was like as a subspecies Acronicta aceris: http://oopt.aari.ru/bio/64012
I will raise up cuspis, but we must wait and see what the people had to say .... :)

16.02.2014 18:50, Irina Nikulina

Perhaps, Triaena (Acronicta) intermedia http://catocala.narod.ru/noc104.html
http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Triaena_intermedia.html
http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=519
or Triaena (Acronicta) cuspis http://catocala.narod.ru/noc118.html
http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Triaena_cuspis.html
http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=540&