Photo #61723: Dolerus gonager

10.01.2017 13:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I fixed it myself because the view is clearly not this one: https://insecta.pro/gallery/61722 (the name is written again in the classification specification line). Peter, you have to pretend there (he wrote under the picture). Yuri, another request. Please write the name of the type, if it is not in the database, in the comments to the photo or in the column " Additional information / note. For example, a specimen bred from a pupa, or the Identification was made from a photo, or any other additional information" In the column " Classification specification (shape, age). For example, a light form or a third-instar larva."you don't need to write the type name. This column has a very specific topic, which does not include the type name.

10.01.2017 13:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

10.01.2017 13:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov

And it doesn't work for me either. But in the line " Specification of classification (form, age). For example, a light form or a third-instar larva."there are no auto-substitutions by default. Therefore, this is not a matter of auto-substitution.

10.01.2017 13:22, Alexandr Zhakov

Auto-insertion doesn't work. I have. :)

10.01.2017 13:15, Peter Khramov

I don't know if it's related or not, but now it seems that there is a glitch with auto-substitutions. People, do wildcards work for you?

10.01.2017 12:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yuri, what is this supposed to mean: "Photo #61723: Dolerus gonager Imago, Discoelius zonalis"??? As far as I think Dolerus gonager and Discoelius zonalis are two different species. Please restore order in your personal account. Remove unnecessary items.