Photo #10574: Iphiclides podalirius

18.08.2014 19:51, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Iphiclides podalirinus → Iphiclides podalirius.

18.08.2014 19:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov

OK. I bear :)

18.08.2014 19:34, Alex Dumchus

Of course, for me it does not matter. The main thing that was the truth.

18.08.2014 13:25, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yes, Podalirius figured out already. Alexander, not vzrazhaesh if I leave the definition of Anatoly? After the file had called podalirius: Apparently, something went wrong at boot time, and this man really is rarely wrong.

18.08.2014 12:43, Alex Dumchus

Definitely, I.podalirius! Verifies the underside, almost under a magnifying glass.

18.08.2014 8:38, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well, if the file is named "podalirius" , then I think it is not necessary to clarify anything, but must endure. Gaffe when loading it likely is. Just a question: whose determination to put? :)

18.08.2014 3:55, Peter Khramov

Original file name podalirius, so maybe a glitch at startup. Although it is a pity ... and Basil, to specify a minute Anatoly really ...

18.08.2014 3:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, I have the honor to know personally Anatoly and I think that the probability of error here is close to 0. However, it will be necessary to ask him to check. IMHO carry too early yet :)

17.08.2014 16:05, Alex Dumchus

Oh, brothers in mind. Something tells me that this is a banal Podalirius. I caught this in Turkey, and it is close to Armenia. Yes, and our local - per person. In podalirinusa, rear wings, a red strip on the underside outlined two dark lines. Yes, and he will be brighter. Yes, and its habitat in the east will.Unfortunately, butterfly super rare, and it is not my collection. If necessary, I give underside of Turkish and Rostov. Comparison., Then remove foty.