Photo #13981: Tanaecia iapis

24.11.2014 14:31, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Tanaecia iapis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

24.11.2014 14:13, Yuri Semejkin

It seems to have a definition, and in view of uncertain numbers?

03.09.2014 21:26, Dmitriy Pozhogin This species is identified correctly.

02.09.2014 4:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I confirm: the changing system works perfect, just like a Swiss watch. Using that since first monthes of this year and honestly can't understand how it can be any confusing :)

02.09.2014 0:18, Peter Khramov

It's okay replaced. Let's call each other and do everything at me, then there shall be neponyatnok. Write me in the mail when it is convenient to you to do.

01.09.2014 14:54, Alex Dumchus

Peter. 32989

01.09.2014 14:42, Peter Khramov

Alexander upload Fautua again and send me her number. Then do not do anything, I'll check again, call each other and to clarify that where not happening.

01.09.2014 12:48, Alex Dumchus

Well, some mystic, I again removed the photo, and then another. Though laugh, though you cry again .. What add? or it will be very soon

31.08.2014 22:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov

And this is or that: without a difference - take foty turned a 2 identical turned and they go under different numbers :)

31.08.2014 22:05, Peter Khramov

As I wrote, the two foty completely identical. Ie New has replaced the old. What Trouble something?

31.08.2014 21:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov

32964 On the phone sealed, of course. I have a PC at hand will not be until the next day.

31.08.2014 21:09, Peter Khramov

Basil, specifying the number doubles, apparently, you're sealed. About deleting a thousand times already explained why it is necessary to replace the complete duplicates and not deleted.

31.08.2014 19:20, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Peter, you're so daring this photo disputation with this incomprehensible :) Have a normal analogue underside numbered 3264
Alexander, moderators are not engaged in the removal of that we are not magicians and can only be removed :)

31.08.2014 18:31, Peter Khramov

Well these two pics look totally alike. You just uploaded the same pic or replaced with that the old pic long ago. If something goes wrong, please give me a call to make it together online despite using capslock with three exclamation marks. Why?..

31.08.2014 18:09, Alex Dumchus

No double anymore, I uploaded new pic #32964 cause the previous one somehow disappeared whilst I was changing and this one was kept despite I did everything recommended. So this pic to be removed and #32964 to be kept. Won't remove or change anything more!!! Let the moderator does that.

31.08.2014 17:25, Peter Khramov

Please give a link to the double (who knows its number).

31.08.2014 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Sorry, won't do anything. Turns out double. Can't get it, why reupload pic instead of changing with new one :)

31.08.2014 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Now I see from my phone the new pic instead of the previous one, will move it where it should be. Just to group that with underside pic. The author can do it himself.

31.08.2014 12:20, Alex Dumchus

It doesn't as I said in the previous post. Remove it yourself.

30.08.2014 22:47, Peter Khramov

I may misunderstand a little. Question: why the new pic wasn't moved here to change the previous one? Or the moving feature doesn't work again, Alexandr, eh?

30.08.2014 20:24, Alex Dumchus

Petr, ok. Remove this one and keep the latest with underside.

30.08.2014 20:18, Peter Khramov

Why remove? Just change this pic to the new one, that's it.

30.08.2014 20:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well to remove then (as said before) :)

30.08.2014 18:37, Alex Dumchus

Yep, that's it.

30.08.2014 9:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov

To Petr's request, is this the same specimen as here http://lepidoptera.pro/gallery/32947 ?

30.08.2014 9:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Lexias pardalis / Confidently identified / Alex Dumchus → Not identified.

30.08.2014 1:06, Peter Khramov

Is it the same specimen?

29.08.2014 8:18, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Just remove this one and ok.

29.08.2014 7:56, Alex Dumchus

Now doubting. Dmitry IDed this one as Tanaecia iapis, so this pic to be removed for sure, at least off L.pardalis not to confuse anything. Petr please remove it yourself.

29.08.2014 7:52, Alex Dumchus

I didn't cause Dmitry had had doubts about the very ID, later he identified that. May I change or you do it yourself?

29.08.2014 0:10, Vasiliy Feoktistov

So I got that Alexandr had reuploaded the same specimen. Dunno why didn't he change with new one.

28.08.2014 23:38, Peter Khramov

If double, why wasn't joined to the new pic?

28.08.2014 20:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I've moved that one already. Petr, please remove this one, worst shot.

28.08.2014 20:33, Alex Dumchus

Sorry, Dmitry's IDed already.

28.08.2014 20:32, Alex Dumchus

Yep, and new #32947 to not identified.

28.08.2014 18:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov

So to remove this one?

28.08.2014 15:39, Alex Dumchus

Dmitry, done. Pic and underside #32947.

28.08.2014 7:46, Alex Dumchus

Will add near days.

27.08.2014 22:36, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Underside needed, seems Tanaecia gender.

20.07.2014 18:06, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Imago → Male.

05.01.2013 23:22, Peter Khramov

Moved.

30.12.2012 18:22, Peter Khramov

Will move this after the species database update.

30.12.2012 14:45, Alex Dumchus

Lexias pardalis.

30.07.2012 22:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Underside needed.