Photo #22601: Lepidoptera sp.

22.01.2014 1:07, Andrey Polstyanoy

Heliconius cydno f1 х Heliconius melpomene f1

04.09.2013 13:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yes, they do. Here's my paphia : http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/biodiversity/uk-biodiversity/cockayne/database/image.dsml?filename=500027X&taxon=Argynnis+paphia&taxonID=8551

04.09.2013 12:55, Alex Dumchus

Why that's interesting. I didn't know that aberrations had names.

04.09.2013 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yes, you can create a profile with the name of the type: "Artificially obtained by experiment Butterfly" and had to drag those uniting the photos into groups. For example: "Heliconius", "Vanessa", etc., etc.
As for entering to be the "natural" and aberrants ginandromorfov not agree so they often have a scientific name.An example of this conditionality me this summer in nature unusual Argynnis paphia: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/22814 (is the official name).

02.09.2013 17:12, Alex Dumchus

Guys, they need not be defined. This Costa Ricans razvekayutsya crossing as Indonesians crossed his ornithopter: since those times (O.akakeae) -Can give them names, really belongs to the genus? or partition and call -Ublyudki! to bring the aberration and ginandomorfov

02.09.2013 6:39, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Could be so. Anyway undetectable unless of. No names of these hybrids (do not know).

02.09.2013 5:47, Peter Khramov

Maybe as Heliconis spp. simply?

02.09.2013 4:58, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Peter, can separate section on this do?
How to define them have no idea.

20.06.2013 15:46, Alex Dumchus

The photo 22595-22601 hybrids gelikonis