Photo #27744: Ematurga atomaria

15.03.2014 9:49, Tatyana Gordeeva This species is identified correctly.

22.02.2014 21:54, Irina Nikulina

Peter, thank you. The question remains just could not)

22.02.2014 21:21, Peter Khramov

Irina, the selection kinds of dogs in general does not apply to the extent right. It is even a definition does not apply. It's just convenient, when in the middle of any text there is mention of the form and then, op, you can go directly to the page of the form. Ho.If, for example, the comments in the preceding references are already there, it is not necessary in every new comment jam (the same kind), it will not be easy, and the solid ripples from uncomfortable with reference reading.Therefore (all true) at the first mention of the type on the page dog set, then do not put, if the discussion was delayed, and you see that the first dog gone much down, and references to the form still relevant - then again, once set and then again missing.In other words, the ideal option - it is not a text without references and links ripples through every word of this text, which from time to time come across links that do not interfere with the perceived source single canvas.

22.02.2014 18:48, Irina Nikulina

Well, Alexander, I'll know. I thought it was the exclusive right of the moderators. One question - do so always or only when I'm in the definition of 100%?

22.02.2014 12:16, Alexandr Zhakov

Ira, a big request, certain species name, framed by a double "dogs" @, then get a direct link to the form, such asEmaturga atomaria

22.02.2014 12:14, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Ematurga atomaria / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

22.02.2014 12:05, Irina Nikulina

Ematurga atomaria?