Photo #28577: Tethea ocularis

15.04.2014 23:04, Irina Nikulina

:) Now I understood more subspecies have to make now write.

15.04.2014 22:48, Alexandr Zhakov

It Vladimer initially cast doubt on its own definition, but I did not notice :)

15.04.2014 22:47, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

15.04.2014 22:32, Irina Nikulina

Thank Basil, not quite understand why the inaccurate delivered, some doubts still remain?

15.04.2014 13:01, Alexandr Zhakov

Sergienko, confirmed the identification and subspecies amurensis Warren, 1912, should be added to the page type.

15.04.2014 12:59, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Tethea albicostata / Vladimir Bobow → Tethea ocularis / Irina Nikulina.

15.04.2014 11:23, Irina Nikulina

Yes, Sasha, I agree, it is necessary to dig, as the time appears only 6 species in 37 reg. (this is a seaside octogesima- just in case), but many local subspecies. I looked very carefully, very inclined to Tethea ocularis amurensis Warren, 1912. This subspecies is represented Cajark on your molbiol-e http://molbiol.ru/forums/index.php?showtopic=347465&view=findpost&p=915277

15.04.2014 10:51, Alexandr Zhakov

Thank you, Ira, I looked, I did not like, but there are many types and you need to watch it. And now the time is not enough, but on top of that no options :)

15.04.2014 2:20, Irina Nikulina

I think it is ratherTethea ocularis(or DV-view ampliata, it is necessary to look more in detail)