Photo #29401: Argynnis aglaja

07.12.2014 19:25, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Argynnis aglaja / Confidently identified / Stan Korb.

06.12.2014 23:17, Stan Korb

aglaja

22.08.2014 22:51, Yuriy Karpov

Over agree with Argynnis niobe, by the same female. A.vorax darker.

25.05.2014 5:15, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yes, I would have put on Aglaia .... If it were not for DV. Here underside needs to be sure: it is for these friends to explain the easiest way .... And underside-and no ... (

24.05.2014 1:19, Eugene Karolinskiy

I would put at Aglaya. It seems, on the rear fenders to see the underside corresponding pattern.

22.05.2014 15:42, Shamil Murtazin

And I like the "type" of butterflies. It is interesting to look for a matching :)
Houses for directory look too =)

22.05.2014 12:26, Irina Nikulina

Not, of course. At first glance, I would have sent her to Aglaia, but the genus Argynnis, given the many DV-species, is difficult for me) especially adippe-like group. Niobe, ksippa, adippa, nerippa ... There is also a vorax with coredippe available) Everything is clear with only nerippe. It is necessary to understand well.

22.05.2014 12:12, Irina Nikulina

She zhe who is this?) Here I have my doubts between the 2 types of perlamutrovok, left to professionals.

22.05.2014 12:11, Shamil Murtazin

And no, it is not (Melitaea sutschana meant)

22.05.2014 11:58, Shamil Murtazin

Is it the same? =)