Photo #3018: Trogonoptera brookiana trogon

23.08.2015 23:40, Peter Khramov

With fotami corrected, now displays all the rules. As for the anchor links - I understand you.

23.08.2015 23:09, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Probably because of this innovation is now, and not all kinds of photos are displayed on the right of this page?
Regarding the meaning of use: still do not think this is correct. There is enough for all the logic of information on the subspecies of the title, and only the reference should be to look at.

23.08.2015 23:00, Peter Khramov

No, this is not a technical glitch. INFA of subtypes we currently displayed in the pages of the relevant species and to link. And what of information that can be a little - so even for species not all descriptions are available.

23.08.2015 19:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Peter, now substantially delivered me a question. So it should be?
If it's a technical glitch - it is necessary to fix :))

23.08.2015 19:16, Peter Khramov

Alexander, it seems to me that we are conducting "talk about anything".
Bull's-eye.

23.08.2015 17:46, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander seems to me that we are conducting "talk about anything".
If the link is meant to mean the form in it and needs to be established even if the page type can be infa subspecies. A page ultimately belongs mind not subspecies.
There are separate pages subspecies - are appropriate and links indicating the subspecies.There are also links-figuratively speaking incorrect.
I am sure many will not like it if we pay attention, and not me alone.

23.08.2015 14:21, Alexandr Zhakov

Granted, Basil, but on the pages of the form we have is often information about the subspecies. And subspecies are listed there, and certainly with the authors, so no trouble. But really why in some cases in view of the other subspecies.

23.08.2015 12:42, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander, if it were separate pages were then subspecies, would be unprincipled.
If there are no pages and all links are on the page of the form it means that they should be called the same, not differently.
Here "Description Trogonoptera brookiana trogon"
And here; http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/30810 "Description Trogonoptera brookiana albescens"
But in the end both links lead to one place to the form.On the basis of this really necessary to link all called simply "Description Trogonoptera brookiana"

23.08.2015 11:22, Alexandr Zhakov

Basil, I think it does not matter, go to the page type, or where there is a description or just a subspecies name. But basically, you're right, it should be uniformity. :)

23.08.2015 11:03, Vasiliy Feoktistov

And there is now a reference reads: "Description Trogonoptera brookiana trogon ", and leads to the description of the species.
Why subspecies of a link in the registers? It should not be

23.08.2015 10:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

23.08.2015 10:31, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Trogonoptera brookiana → Trogonoptera brookiana trogon.

23.01.2015 15:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

06.02.2011 18:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Trogonoptera brookiana trogon, Snellen van Vollenhoven, 1860.

17.01.2011 8:04, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Male.

19.07.2009 14:35, Peter Khramov

Caught location updated.

16.07.2009 20:27, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Where was caught: Sumatra.