Bombyx huttoni Westwood, 1847

08.01.2014 16:50, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I think it is necessary to remove all comments from this page. And it creates a separate subject devoted to issues zoonomenklatury, classification, etc., etc. The page type is somehow not quite good this discussion looks.

08.01.2014 1:04, Peter Khramov

Shamil brackets carry additional information, and do not distinguish one type from another. More on this as well as many more as spelled out in the Code of Nomenclature zoo, which can be read, for example, here http://iczn.org/sites/iczn.org/files/Code_Russian%20Edition%202004_0.pdf

08.01.2014 0:02, Shamil Murtazin

Basil is generally understood.
Can you tell us, but rather a separate theme to somehow formalize what caused this attitude to punctuation? ..
Are there species that differ only in the brackets around the names and the year?!.

07.01.2014 19:49, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Brace is not: it means the original description. Classification surezno thing :)

07.01.2014 19:32, Shamil Murtazin

Basil, see: no staples in the book. they carry some information? (I do not know if you are).
Otherwise, just do as I suggest in any other form - name and year in parentheses. for the sake of uniformity, no more.

07.01.2014 18:47, Vasiliy Feoktistov

From the information that is needed braces? http://www.threatenedtaxa.org/ZooPrintJournal/2013/January/Booklet_26Jan13.pdf Looking at the document should dial huttoni

07.01.2014 18:33, Shamil Murtazin

lacks braces around the names and the year. for uniformity.