Stichophthalma uemurai Nishimura, 1998

30.07.2015 18:00, Peter Khramov

With regard to review - now doing an updated tree nasekomyshey, including attendants (editing taxa base molding is locked). How to set up, if necessary, we will have to edit within the updated system.

30.07.2015 11:48, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Yes, I looked - there is there is no difference! The genitals are not shown, about the differences there is nothing! Only habitats, and is also quite controversial. General types are defined only by the label with the geography. Again, the question of the importance of the integrity of labels and descriptors species)))

30.07.2015 7:08, Alex Dumchus

Understood, Dmitry. Thank you. All three + godfreyi refer to "cambodia
-group ", and the differences may be, by and large, only areas. That's it.
What is interesting in the article, new species, before the former subspecies louisa: S. mathilda, S. eamesi, and S.suffusa (previously subspecies hovqua). Whom to believe?
By the way, I recommend http://stichophthalma.simdif.com/.
Peter may have to reconsider the views like that?

29.07.2015 22:39, Peter Khramov

Zabodat!

29.07.2015 22:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin

Alexander! This article can help you understand http://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Atalanta_41_0229-0233.pdf