Philaenus spumarius Linnaeus, 1758

04.11.2016 8:09, Alex Dumchus

No, Peter . Skype on the tablet was hacked, on the phone no-the picture is faceted. Whatsap put on your phone and don't worry)

03.11.2016 23:51, Peter Khramov

Alexander, did you manage Skype? It would be necessary to connect all the same...

03.11.2016 21:04, Ivan Tislenko

In general, I would automatically grant editing rights to everyone who posted a sufficient number of photos of various taxa (for example, > 100 or 200 taxa). As a rule, these are people who are interested, meticulous and responsible. Otherwise, the site will drown in errors, typos, and inaccuracies in the absence of curators.

03.11.2016 20:25, Alex Dumchus

Vasiliy. I think Peter doesn't need this, and neither does Korb ( Stradomsky told me for him, whose opinion I fully trust!) ...well, then why do I need it???... well, let the site fade away?(((

01.11.2016 7:41, Vasiliy Feoktistov

You need to talk to Peter so that he gives you the rights of a curator and you will correct them yourself where required )))

01.11.2016 7:14, Alex Dumchus

Vasiliy. No problem. I can travel by sailboat. Everything except Parnassus. I've already mentioned a few errors. And who's going to fix this whole thing?

01.11.2016 1:24, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexander. Well, connect ))) What's the question ?

31.10.2016 20:37, Alex Dumchus

And who is responsible for the sailboats? Why are sailboats a constant mess? Gentlemen, sailboats are, in my opinion, the most popular family that everyone pays attention to. Here are a couple more offhand blunders - Atrop. neptunus and Losaria neptunus are the same thing, P. mechowiana and P. mechowianus are the same thing.Just like Gr. policenes and polycenes. If the curator ( Korb?) if it doesn't work, then you need to find someone else. The site is already in English. Shame on you (((

31.10.2016 17:55, Irina Nikulina

Alexander, you do not understand, I am not on sailboats, but I am responsible for illustrating the views on the site for all detachments (to help Peter). Here, if somewhere for some reason the view is not illustrated, although there is already a photo to it - you can contact)

31.10.2016 15:54, Alex Dumchus

Oh, Irina. I didn't know you were on sailboats. I raised this issue with Peter at the beginning of the 15th year. By the way, if you are interested in sailing ships, please clarify the genus (subgenus ?) Chilasa. I also raised this question, a long time ago. It is necessary to take out of the genus Papilio-agestor, paradoxa,toboroi, well, etc. follow the list..

31.10.2016 15:17, Irina Nikulina

The discussion should really be moved to the "Site Discussion", but for now I will answer Al. Dumchus here to a specific question about Papilio alcmenor, since this concerns me. I looked - I do NOT have this view in the LC, as it is not illustrated. Everything that comes to the LC, I illustrate on time, almost every day). There is no first photo in the view illustration (that's why the window is empty), and the second one is still there. I have absolutely no idea why, so I'll add it now. If this situation has already developed a couple of years ago, it would probably have been necessary to raise the issue earlier, because it is easily corrected)

31.10.2016 14:32, Yuri Semejkin

Alexander ! Then reschedule it. I started the discussion here with a complaint to the admin. How many breakfasts can you feed, (tomorrow, then, there is no time) How long do you all decide nothing in the office, just talk. I don't even know why almost everything got up. ? Due to technical limitations, or not wanting to do something. Can someone answer ? In order for the site to develop, it must be interesting. People most likely would be happy to add information that has nowhere to insert Komarov suggested creating a section "Biological features" that would be universal. So what? Nothing has been done, nothing has changed, and nothing has been explained. Why his offers didn't go, and he's a pro. Maybe the site's resources are limited ? Duck could be said to remove the topic. Who forgot to reread his points in the topic " To discuss information on the page descriptions of species: from 18-19. 06. 16 g I have everything.

31.10.2016 14:13, Alexandr Zhakov

I don't think the discussion on Vida's page is appropriate :), it will be difficult to find it in a while. We need to move all the posts.

31.10.2016 13:23, Vasiliy Feoktistov

"And the moderators, yes.... (((, for example, Papilio alcmenor - there is still no photo in the window, but a couple of years ago I started photos ("Alexander, each person on the site performs only certain functions. Somewhere there was a list of who was doing what. Moderators are not responsible for solving your problem. We do not moderate such cases )))

31.10.2016 13:00, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yuri, well, I also returned to molbiol after a year's absence there ))). This does not interfere at all with my presence on the site in parallel. That's not the point. I identified the root of the problems in my previous post and it's time to do something about it. Otherwise, everything will really stall completely (

31.10.2016 12:59, Alex Dumchus

Dyk, Vasily, a reflection of the general trend is obvious. Few people collect grasshoppers, cicadas or dragonflies.( and most importantly-very few people are interested in them!) And butterflies and beetles-as many as you want. So what's the point of doing the rest? There is no motivation! And most importantly, it never will. As for butterflies, I add photos as soon as something new appears in the collection . And the moderators, yes.... (((, here for example Papilio alcmenor - still no photos in the window, but a couple of years ago I started photos(

31.10.2016 11:58, Yuri Semejkin

Alexander ! Bugs have nothing to do with it, well, I don't like them, don't get distracted by them. Switch to lepidoptera, and then only butterflies will appear on the screen. The site's features allow you to make selective viewing for any squad. The bad thing is that the site doesn't develop for any of the teams. Even moderators can't change the situation, and suggestions don't pass. And who, or what is the reason here: The Admin does not want to change something or the technical capabilities of the site are not so important. All this has been going on for a long time, so the stagnation on the site is obvious. Vasily ! Even your colleague seems to have finally switched to ZIN. And rare professionals were not on the site ( except for short periods of time), and will not be

31.10.2016 11:22, Peter Khramov

Alexander, regarding the division of the site — for this there is a Lepidoptera button at the top right of any page (for temporary switching to the display mode of the desired squad) or the corresponding setting in the LC (for permanent switching). After all, it was made long ago at the request of TV viewers... Vasily, as for the add-ons for the site — you're right, I've been slowing down with this question for a very long time, but it seems that nothing radically new will be added before NG. Full achtung continues over time: --(

31.10.2016 11:17, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well, I do not throw just because the camera is covered and for six months to shoot acc. there is nothing ( And there is simply no time to work on this issue right now). If there is a camera , there will be pictures: the collection is large and is updated almost daily (including winter). Absolutely purple is what groups of insects are represented on the site. I welcome any suggestions. The root of the problem is that there is simply no one on the site to deal with other insects other than butterflies and beetles. Well, the technical tasks that were set by moderators/curators to the admin almost a year ago have not yet been solved. From this, in a human way, just hands are already lowered to do something (

31.10.2016 7:27, Alex Dumchus

Yuri. I can explain why - the site was "blurred". I, for example, completely "on the drum" all insects except butterflies. I go to the site, and what I see in the gallery is a solid bug and strebul ((( I'm already getting uninterested! You can't embrace the vast! We need to create separate sites for different teams!!! Then everyone will find their own site based on their interests. The vast majority of foreign websites are organized in this way.

29.10.2016 4:49, Yuri Semejkin

[253] should be deleted. It duplicates [ 257 ]. And all this is because Peter has not yet put things in order, in particular, in the LIST of REFERENCES. How much can I talk about this, or do I not need any information ? In general, it seems that people are throwing pictures on the site less and less often, probably out of habit. See the case for the "sunset" goes.