Photo #32025: Spilosoma lutea

07.08.2014 16:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

→ Spilosoma lutea.

07.08.2014 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov

While Let pobudet inaccurate.

07.08.2014 16:40, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

Not identified → / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

07.08.2014 16:25, Yuri Semejkin

Finish writing

02.08.2014 18:56, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Well, here sheSpilosoma luteafigures and Spilarctia lutea in her synonyms worth. We must will explain this issue.
Yuri, you have to add a subspecies of the form: Spilosoma lutea ssp. japonica (Rothschild, 1910) and then I think you can carry in inaccurate, "the place" :)

02.08.2014 18:33, Irina Nikulina

And in my opinion, in theSpilarctia lutea(subspecies japonica in the southern Far East) is much like bodshe thanThyrgorina jankowskii/ (By the way, there are still 2 stranichki- and Thyrgorina jankowskii and Lemyra jankowskii, what Alexander had already written six months ago. It would be necessary, perhaps, to remind not to lose this remark)

30.07.2014 13:04, Vitalij Dobronosov

I am inclined to think that this is - Lemyra jankowskii (Oberthur, [1881] 1880) (as V. Dubatolov).

30.07.2014 13:02,

I am inclined to think that this is - Lemyra jankowskii (Oberthur, [1881] 1880) (as V. Dubatolov).

30.07.2014 0:21, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Zelo ourSpilosoma lutealooks like. But the transfer will not undertake due to the geography, alas (
It is necessary that someone else napispl ....