Collecting data on where and what butterfly species are protected

Community and Forum → Other questions. Insects topics → Collecting data on where and what butterfly species are protected

Peter Khramov, 13.01.2014 18:25

I want to add a section in the description of the view on Lepidoptera.ru — whether the species is included in the protected lists and, if so, in which ones. Accordingly, it will be possible to view this information on the page with the description, as well as select species based on it (i.e. show protected or unguarded or protected here on this list).
This requires the original data. If everything is clear with Cites, then with our Red Books (first of all, regional Ones, of course) — on the contrary.
Therefore: if anyone has scans of the currently relevant regional Red Books (or can shoot pages dedicated to butterflies) - post pliz links in this topic or drop me an email main#lepidoptera.ru and then I can process all this and make convenient selections on the site for general use.
If anyone has any thoughts on the idea as such-also write in the topic, it will be interesting.

Comments

Likes: 1

17.01.2014 14:21, Penzyak

For nature protection, even in a particular "Mukhosransk", nothing can be done without their regional CC "Mukhodrishchenskaya" region. And if you also take into account that people often write them, let's say "accidentally" or on behalf - and often just for banal pennies from the "head" that is, an essay on a protected species.... And that's when the shoving in of anything "valuable" that lives/grows on their territory begins... Yes, there will definitely be a narrow-minded mossy luminary in the "given" field of sciences who, without a little effort, will sweep out the sprouts of the rational and make their own crusty archaic adjustments.... At the same time, it is not uncommon for pennies allocated for this particular project to fall into the hands of not quite clean bosses... where some of them will accidentally stick to their "raking paws".... and the other will be profucated for a picnic in the entourage of an under-paid local protected area.... Examples of this in these troubled times, no matter how sad it is, are enough to smear the most beautiful idea.

17.01.2014 19:48, AGG

Well, duc to all who do not want to get under the distribution of the same. Like, warned, therefore, armed.

Peter, read EVERYTHING from beginning to end! even in your quote of me, there is a hard-to-fulfill condition

and even more so ZERO benefits. If you value your time SO much (=0), then good luck

PS just for fun, and who "we got under the distribution"? even fans of argali pohmalyat AKM otmazali

(and this, with the HIGHEST control !!!!)?

PPS who nah is interested in vikrama in the Tambov region, except me? and a few other people? maybe let's go breastfeed to preserve a Large oak barbel in Lipetsk (a copy without a label)!!!!!

it's all nonsense! don't clutter up a good website. don't waste your time and energy on empty ideas - my opinion

This post was edited by AGG - 17.01.2014 21: 24

Likes: 3

Likes: 1

17.01.2014 23:48, Peter Khramov

well, they would have said right away that the topic is about selling / hunters/exchange, what is there to hide a sin for everyone? we are all sinful-sometimes we even change the material

The topic is not about the sale/trappers/exchange, but about consolidating information about the protection of butterfly species from the so-called legislation of the Russian Federation (first of all) and other countries (not first) on Modeling.

then rename the topic to "red book sales / exchanges", or how not to fall under "distribution"

How exactly not to get in is not clear to everyone: rigor is compensated by non-compliance. I don't mean that. I mean, it would be nice for the user to have at least some kind of list that you can focus on the protection of species. And he's not here right now. At best, the CC RF plus CITES.

the question remains the same - how often will you update the relevant pages? (VNII OP, for several years, was able to generate a book as of 2004 - in 2008) fucking bureaucrats!

Bureaucrats, they are, yes. We will update the corresponding pages more often than the authors of any other summary list. Because there is no other list. And if there is one — throw a link at me, I will gladly not do double work;--))