Nimble they skotinku until Zamora already obbitsya manage. As they say - "how to convey, so as not to spill?"
Basil, I went on the links. Now even more confidence that it is - Cosmia affinis. The underside of the rear wing clarifies everything. I think so!
Alas, Peter, no compilations, clean the scan sheet "living" book. Just contrast clocked in Photoshop. Where offer electronic version?
Probably so. They write that presented subspecies only clearly visible differences. The rest are missing. But why this sub-species is not on the page? If it flies - to be! And in general, it is desirable to all subtypes indicate the place of residence! Or "letters" sorry? :-)
Sorry, I did not understand. I put a subspecies of aces - http://rusinsects.com/p-apol.htm. There just merzbacheri for North. Tien Shan and Dzungaria.
From top to bottom - Alexis Amanda argiolus, Alexis, and three argiolus Amanda. Could in someone to make a mistake. A Cupido buddhista observed at altitudes of 2300 to 3400 m. Your shot is more than a kilometer below.
Leon, I found only - Polyommatus amandus, Glaucopsyche alexis, Celastrina argiolus. Maybe someone will make out? Cupido buddhista exactly no.
Chazara enervatait. Yesterday collected their local, seen enough! Replica just too small. Fresh live pictures added. On the underside drawing with Chazara prieuri not converge. More reference for comparison - http://www.leps.it/indexjs.htm?SpeciesPages/ChazaPrieu.htm.
Leon, try to look at our local site nature lovers. There's a good selection of plants. And mushrooms. http://innature.kz/infusions/advanced_articles_sort/plantae_reg.php
Leon, I identified these signs: background wing uniformly gray, no blue plaque. All spots and veins isolated light piping (stroke). Size is also smaller. Something like that.
Great shot! Thick black background. Good detail and focus. It is necessary to me, too, to buy a camera.