Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596... 629

14.01.2011 4:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3663

This species is identified correctly.

14.01.2011 4:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3848

Assimilis subspecies (Linnaeus, 1758).

14.01.2011 4:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3847

Assimilis subspecies (Linnaeus, 1758) .

14.01.2011 4:37, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3846

If it's South China (Yunnan, apparently), so must be Sasakia charonda yunnanensis Fruhstorfer.

13.01.2011 21:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #3934

This species is identified correctly.

13.01.2011 12:18, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3279

Moved.

13.01.2011 10:16, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #2995

In my photos this one is also named as pylaon! I've just fouled up while uploading :)

13.01.2011 1:48, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2091

Meh, species name updated.

13.01.2011 1:42, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2714

Comment goes to the species description page.

13.01.2011 1:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3540

Moved to Phyllophila obliterata.

13.01.2011 1:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3546

Photo goes to Eucarta virgo.

13.01.2011 1:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3344

Uncertain too.

13.01.2011 1:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3343

Ok then, nemorella, uncertain though.

13.01.2011 1:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2966

Goes to Pronophila unifasciata...

13.01.2011 1:34, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3435

Shot moved.

13.01.2011 1:30, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2965

Photo moved to the new species created.

13.01.2011 1:23, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3969

Comment moved to the species description page, http://lepidoptera.pro/species/notodonta-ziczac/.

13.01.2011 1:21, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3962

Goes to A. rumicis, "uncertain".

13.01.2011 1:20, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4032

Goes to Triodia sylvina.

13.01.2011 1:19, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4026

Moved.

13.01.2011 1:15, Alexandr Zhakov: comment on photo #3387

Identifying tends to go very forward. Actually, it's too late for this species, though maybe that's the reason of its worn-out appearance. Anyway, no other suggestions on the mind.

13.01.2011 1:13, Peter Khramov: comment on Agriopis aurantiaria

Note moved to the photo http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/3678/

13.01.2011 1:05, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3542

See, this image is a very popular one...

13.01.2011 1:00, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4158

Ok then, moved.

13.01.2011 0:59, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2151

As far as I can remember, Igor usually shoots somewhere nearby Novorossiysk. Goes to M. cinxia.

13.01.2011 0:57, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3672

Thanks, moved.

13.01.2011 0:50, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #2923

Species added, photo moved.

13.01.2011 0:39, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3800

Goes from "undetermined" to "uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:38, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3839

Still left in "uncertain".

13.01.2011 0:37, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3841

Moved.

13.01.2011 0:31, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3407

Ok then, moved to A. adippe.

13.01.2011 0:15, Peter Khramov: comment on Spam

The filter is, simply need to update it regularly for new templates. If it were not, the spam would valilsya mountain ... With regards to the authors - as anti-spam method, of course, is good, but should be able to nezaregannye threads and comments, and news (but not foty and types). Therefore, while it is not necessary to separate.In general, I will do what is possible under the present ...

12.01.2011 23:58, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3239

Moved then.

12.01.2011 22:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #3930

Guy moved to males.

12.01.2011 22:30, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #2577

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3069

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:29, Vasiliy Feoktistov: comment on photo #3012

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 22:15, Evgeny Komarov: comment on photo #4177

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 19:42, Peter Khramov: comment on 32 new photos

Yes, it is strange. These two types of back, will have another look / check out other ...

12.01.2011 19:40, Peter Khramov: comment on photo #4019

Photo goes to Z. minos as well as images nearby, status "uncertain".

12.01.2011 15:47, Peter Khramov: comment on Gathering of binding to type some unpublished photos

Last night and this morning my fault could come loose binding to type some unpublished photos. The names of species remain so today, everything will be restored, do not need to elaborate.

12.01.2011 14:10, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #4161

This species is identified correctly.

12.01.2011 2:12, Peter Khramov: comment on Increased ease of search and download pictures

Now and in the search box the site and in the "Name of the species" of uploading photos, the search is not only for the main Latin and Russian names, but in Latin synonyms, as well as additional Russian names. School example: hives can be called Aglais urticae , but you can Vanessa urticae .Previously, if you type «vanes» hives we would not have found. Now - find. However, the feature is ...

12.01.2011 0:23, Peter Khramov: comment on Upload photos to the new species and new species themselves

By the way, with multiple birth until now it has been a poser - views were activated, while they themselves were just kind of in the database. Now everything is fixed, including and the reason for the appearance, so that more of these things is not expected ...

11.01.2011 15:16, Peter Khramov: comment on About superfamily, subfamilies, and a simplified classification Online

Originally built on the base O. Karsholt, J. Razowski (eds.), 1996. The Lepidoptera of Europe: a distributional chacklist. Changes: 1. adds a new species, which are on the list was not (not Europe) and 2. Data is deprecated, changed. But both of these points as a percentage is not very high. Alexander Zhakov proposed focus on http://www.faunaeur.org catalog or blue. In fact, the problem is that ...

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1840

This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1838

This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #1839

This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 8:35, Tatyana Gordeeva: comment on photo #3601

This species is identified correctly.

11.01.2011 2:48, Peter Khramov: comment on Adding information to the pages of birth

Now, on page sort but his name is also available information about the author and the year of first description (if available in the database of the site).