E-mail: Password: Create an Account Recover password

Authors Contacts Get involved Русская версия

show

Insecta.pro Community

Pages: 1 ...16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24... 50

28.10.2014 13:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34678

Corrected data. Bhutanitis yulongensis / Alex Dumchus → Bhutanitis mansfieldi / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

28.10.2014 8:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33650

Nothing more to do with it is not necessary - it is in his place.

27.10.2014 23:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Theretra rhesus

Somebody can explain clearly the differences between this type of Theretra rhesus and Theretra insularis. Let's deal!

27.10.2014 20:51, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33267

Marumba sperchius?

27.10.2014 19:43, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #24120

no, I think it is not even pavlinoglazki

27.10.2014 19:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34679

Bhutanitis mansfieldi (Riley, 1939)

27.10.2014 19:40, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34678

It Bhutanitis mansfieldi (Riley, 1939)

27.10.2014 10:41, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on Ypthima argus

http://eol.org/pages/149296/names/synonyms http://www.nic.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/ypthima/ Even if you leave Ypthima argus, the views are not described (Fabricius, 1775) !!! and Butler, 1878 Fabricius described Papilio baldus Fabricius, 1775. I do not know what motivated the team blue.

27.10.2014 0:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34628

Corrected data. Imago → Male.

26.10.2014 23:46, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34662

I'm not to you with complaints - just wondered aloud.

26.10.2014 23:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34662

Ypthima argus is synonymous Ypthima baldus, what's the erroneous definition?

26.10.2014 23:29, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34662

Ypthima baldus (Fabricius, 1775) - the oldest name. I do not understand why the site is argus, and synonyms in baldus

26.10.2014 23:27, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34662

Ypthima baldus (Fabricius, 1775)

26.10.2014 23:22, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34664

Corrected data. Not identified → Sericinus montela / Confidently identified / Vladimir Mescheryakov.

26.10.2014 23:11, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33487

Now comes the genus Anomis

26.10.2014 23:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34659

Nothing similar, except this kind is not even close.

26.10.2014 23:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34659

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

26.10.2014 23:08, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33487

Rusicada combinans

26.10.2014 22:55, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34658

Corrected data. Tentatively identified → Confidently identified.

26.10.2014 22:28, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33497

In this area are more likely to fall than with a red spot. Initially, the brain is also broke.

26.10.2014 22:12, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #33497

This is a Sympis rufibasis

26.10.2014 20:10, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34627

With these red nothing clear

26.10.2014 20:06, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34651

Corrected data. / → Cymothoe haynae / Alex Dumchus.

26.10.2014 19:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34651

It also Cymothoe haynae, as I understand?

26.10.2014 19:05, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34652

It also Cymothoe haynae, as I understand?

26.10.2014 19:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34606

Corrected data. Not identified → Aphrissa orbis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:02, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34605

Corrected data. Not identified → Aphrissa orbis / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34607

Corrected data. Not identified → Appias drusilla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34608

Corrected data. Not identified → Appias drusilla / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34609

Corrected data. Not identified → Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:01, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34610

Corrected data. Not identified → Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34611

Corrected data. Not identified → Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34612

Corrected data. Not identified → Ascia monuste / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34617

Corrected data. Not identified → Ganyra josephina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 19:00, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34618

Corrected data. Not identified → Ganyra josephina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34619

Corrected data. Not identified → Eurema nicippe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34620

Corrected data. Not identified → Eurema nicippe / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34621

Corrected data. Not identified → Eurema dina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:59, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34622

Corrected data. Not identified → Eurema dina / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34623

Corrected data. Not identified → Phoebis argante / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:58, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34624

Corrected data. Not identified → Phoebis argante / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34625

Corrected data. → Aphrissa godartiana.

26.10.2014 18:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34625

Corrected data. Not identified → / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:57, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34626

Corrected data. Not identified → Aphrissa godartiana / Confidently identified / Dmitriy Pozhogin.

26.10.2014 18:56, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34654

A label where?

26.10.2014 17:09, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34627

Perhaps you need in this kind of inaccurate.

26.10.2014 16:54, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34627

A precise label is?

26.10.2014 16:21, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34627

who?

26.10.2014 16:20, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #34625

10.26.2014 13:12 is written under the photo. All types with the Dominican Republic, I identified, suffered, but they have not caught on for some reason. Peter, check

26.10.2014 15:39, Dmitriy Pozhogin: comment on photo #6084

Who determined to species?

Next page

Insecta.pro: international entomological community. Terms of use and publishing policy.

Project editor in chief and administrator: Peter Khramov.

Curators: Konstantin Efetov, Vasiliy Feoktistov, Svyatoslav Knyazev, Evgeny Komarov, Stan Korb, Alexander Zhakov.

Moderators: Vasiliy Feoktistov, Evgeny Komarov, Dmitriy Pozhogin, Alexandr Zhakov.

Thanks to all authors, who publish materials on the website.

© Insects catalog Insecta.pro, 2007—2024.

Species catalog enables to sort by characteristics such as expansion, flight time, etc..

Photos of representatives Insecta.

Detailed insects classification with references list.

Few themed publications and a living blog.