Community and Forum → Comments on insects taxa
Show: All comments in a row. All comments, except for the technical ones.
Pages: 1 ...171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179... 197
It must be combined with Pingasa ruginaria (Guenée, 1857): http://lepidoptera.ru/taxonomy/59272 It is a subspecies of it, rather than a separate species.
It is necessary to add the following subtypes: Pingasa ruginaria andamanica Prout, 1916 Pingasa ruginaria communicans (Walker, 1860) Pingasa ruginaria commutata (Walker, 1860) Pingasa ruginaria interrupta Warren, 1901 Pingasa ruginaria pacifica Inoue, 1964 And of synonyms remove Pingasa ruginaria andamanica Prout, 1916 and Pingasa ruginaria pacifica Inoue, 1964 . Subspecies in ...
Already there :) In general, for such issues is a separate issue: http://lepidoptera.ru/community/18428 and ask them better there.
Celastrina ladon (Cramer, [1780]), but in any case, not Lycaena violacea. someone, something messed up synonyms.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Palaearctic. Flight time: No formalized data → June, July.
Peter brought to the "ideal". Extra subspecies on this page still have! D. o. pseudosignifera (Boursin, 1952). D. o. pseudosignifera (Boursin, 1952). D. o. pygmaea (Hampson, 1903). D. o. pygmaea (Hampson, 1903). And then you can clean up and comments.
http://eol.org/pages/149296/names/synonyms http://www.nic.funet.fi/index/Tree_of_life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/satyrinae/ypthima/ Even if you leave Ypthima argus, the views are not described (Fabricius, 1775) !!! and Butler, 1878 Fabricius described Papilio baldus Fabricius, 1775. I do not know what motivated the team blue.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic. Wingspan: No formalized data → 79—85 mm.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Indo-Malayan. Wingspan: No formalized data → 80—90 mm.
Because in the conflict between the types of infe Fauna Evropeey and the blue of the default priority at Fauna. But synonymous added, so that the search in any case will be triggered for both options.
Peter, figure it out, please. It turns out that one species in the genus. And this kind was created by mistake, due to confusion in the classification (Photography I suffered and the grounds are now here: http://lepidoptera.ru/gallery/33650
Basil, about the migration of butterflies talk tomorrow at the meeting. This page is no longer Saurimo.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic. Wingspan: No formalized data → 19—27 mm.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic. Wingspan: No formalized data → 32—34 mm.
Previously, the information was introduced here as a personal message from the source, using which, I am now added wingspan: http://www.silkmoths.bizland.com/indexos.htm Now this source is in the database and must be corrected.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic. Wingspan: No formalized data → 53—65 mm.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic. Wingspan: No formalized data → 68—73 mm.
Corrected data. Zoogeographical regions: No formalized data → Nearctic, Neotropic. Wingspan: No formalized data → 50—60 mm.