Photo #27133: Acronicta concerpta

16.02.2014 21:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov

By JW I give in and apologize that butted, but it reminds me more aceris (if intermedia its subspecies) or auricoma: both if you believe the notorious Sinev should be there.

16.02.2014 21:14, Irina Nikulina

Thank you Vasily Sergienko, gave confused in these difficult Acronicta) Maybe you see another photo in which bending is also very similar to the bond concerpta, especially in Yap. sites lepidoptera.ru/gallery/27134?

16.02.2014 21:07, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Acronicta concerpta / Confidently identified / Basil Sergienko.

16.02.2014 20:35, Irina Nikulina

Anywhere. Why somewhere to endure, if the type is not defined yet? I just suggested. Jpmoth.org In addition, there are others. Sources such http://bioinfo.lowtem.hokudai.ac.jp/db/modules/zukan/index.php?action=node&node_id=557. Perhaps will et al. Assumption / definitions are the same or more faithful.

16.02.2014 18:53, Vasiliy Feoktistov

In another candidacy: toAcronicta catocaloidait looks like, and if it were to be seen rear wings just a little ........... Carbonaria disappears immediately if the focus on its image on jpmoth Where to endure? ???

16.02.2014 18:28, Vasiliy Feoktistov

I thought onAcronicta rumicis, but she (in this version) on the inner edge of the front wings are almost always white specks are present. Ugh, you no thought can not express. The link is necessary to come, that I have laid out: here it, the site is complete.

16.02.2014 18:10, Irina Nikulina

Perhaps one of the two Hylonycta - catocaloida or carbonaria. Wrote Hylonycta - as they are the Japanese in this genus (search). There - Acronicta. And in general, and Viminia rumicis (our Acronicta rumicis) in the Far variant is not excluded http://www.jpmoth.org/Noctuidae/Acronictinae/Viminia_rumicis.html

16.02.2014 15:26, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yuri, there you have full species Sinev. There seems to dig for subfamily Acronictinae. Was it were closer to me: one on megacephala set-to ........ Here it is lack of information affects "guesswork" ........

16.02.2014 15:17, Yuri Semejkin

It is not Acronicta megacephala ([Denis & Schiffermtiller. Justification: It is not on the territory of Khabarovsk, Primorsky edges. And the kind of looks like another? Rod really is divided into several subgenera, which some considered to be an independent genus.

16.02.2014 15:12, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Peter, and on beetles proektiki can stir up? We are here with Alexei conceive about the site of Cerambycidae :) joke, of course, the butterflies are not having a relationship. And that really is the best site for the region Alexander Boldyrev is Sungaya. Just now he is a "people" has moved down to the other paid hosting because of the sale by Yandex "people," "yukoz" :)

16.02.2014 15:03, Peter Khramov

Why produce misery when you can do everything in the framework of the Project without any further problems with the website of the service. Would infa but who spread.

16.02.2014 14:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov

It's sad that there are enthusiasts ... For example, in the Moscow region. Alexander Boldyrev have a website (one of the authors here) growing on enthusiasm: http://insectamo.ru/ I consider it the best site in the region and he is always helping on a photo of the beetles. Sadly ..... I swear.

16.02.2014 14:34, Yuri Semejkin

Basil. Normal site for butterflies Far East and in particular the Primorye Territory, in the network there. Why? - It does not matter to me.
The site in general is not a photo album, it should be conducted, it should work to develop, and it takes time and is not small. Perhaps the reason for his lack of it.

16.02.2014 13:11, Vasiliy Feoktistov

And add a reference to help that kind of most, that neither is valid: http://www.faunaeur.org/full_results.php?id=449413

16.02.2014 12:45, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Yes, it's not there: Now in blue looked. But this is precisely one of Acronicta, check.
By the way: this butterfly that I have previously incorrectly called simply Acronicta megacephala ([Denis & Schiffermtiller], 1775) And in the race Subacronicta site here's the link: http: // lepidoptera.ru / taxonomy / 1353 Ah, come from the Far East to your entomologists, but did at least have one decent-(definitive) site was in the Far East of the Russian Federation: can miss something, but did not see this in a network. And then all Japan, but Berlov.

16.02.2014 12:31, Yuri Semejkin

The under-ve Acronictinae determinant on Far East this kind does not exist. In the catalog this website in any taxon, the genus is also missing.

16.02.2014 9:04, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Subacronicta megacephala? Should there be like, but I'll pass on DV.