Photo #34240: Acleris issikii

18.10.2014 17:03, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Acleris issikii / Confidently identified / Irina Nikulina.

18.10.2014 16:47, Alexandr Zhakov

Thank you, Yuri, your opinion and definition Irene almost dispelled doubts. :) Stand. :))

18.10.2014 15:51, Yuri Semejkin

From the 3 options presented can be discarded Acleris caerulescens, because front wings in the middle of the costal margin in this species without recess.
Remains 2 species. A. emargana and A. issikii. In both species, in the middle of the costal margin per.krl.est recess along which there is a dark color (the same in both species). However, in the first case (A. emargana), this stain does not produce any barbs and the second (A.issikii) this painting forms an obtuse undulations (3-4 obtuse teeth). Source: Keys to insects of the Russian Far East T5 h 3, page 51.
In general, I'm for option Acleris issikii Oku, 1957

18.10.2014 15:06, Irina Nikulina

Sash, too cautious, too, and looked before writing, these two. But emargana never seen such clear and thin horizontal lines are blurred. And all the revised (especially the Japanese) caerulescens white Zonke much wider. In the literature (from the review of Dubatolov tortricidae) and both types issikii caerulescens listed from Southern Primorye.

18.10.2014 14:48, Alexandr Zhakov

Acleris emargana may be necessary to be very careful, very volatile, or Acleris caerulescens such as the Far East as desirable to know who is usual who found the literature. as well as for those images that are in the net, it is very similar to A. issikii. :)))

18.10.2014 14:00, Irina Nikulina

With high probabilityAcleris issikiimet several times images, including here and http://homepage2.nifty.com/shikokuga/z42hamakiga http://www.jpmoth.org/Tortricidae/Tortricinae/Acleris_issikii.html .html. Perhaps, it can be inaccurate, given the number of species Acleris the RFE.