Photo #55256: Acronicta catocaloida

09.03.2016 13:56, Alexandr Zhakov

Thank you, Yuri. I certainly do not be angry :), this is the case, when the most low-quality (in this case, good :)) picture of the lower wings help to determine the type. I wish he would not overlook any possibility of a precise definition DV species. :)

09.03.2016 13:30, Yuri Semejkin

Yes, I completely forgot about these pictures. Some time later, I started at the order imposing and found a folder with an unknown butterfly. Before and kind of got stalled. I got in touch with Alex and sent, adding a picture where the rear wing can be seen. It was only later, already began to remember that like something tossed to the site. So there were duplicates. .Butterfly seem rare, not known to feed Alexis interested than larvae fed. Ira then passed along with the caterpillar feeds, with the definition of a plant problem. Then it is not decided (who knew that it would take). We have now decided by fragments of the plant in the picture. I will show in the institute, they can at least sort of say.So Alexander, you are too much then do not be angry, that just does not add the main photo.

09.03.2016 11:58, Alexandr Zhakov

I fully agree with Matt. Question Yuri. Why is this image has not been uploaded, along with two other photos. There is clearly visible speciation characters - yellow lower wings. With such a view. Uploaded would not have to correct the error. :)

09.03.2016 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

The image has been placed in the photo #41745 group.

09.03.2016 9:36, Vasiliy Feoktistov Corrected data.

The photo has been deleted from the "same specimen" group.