Photo #63775: Melitaea ornata

05.12.2024 23:02, Peter Khramov

Nikolai, there was no "when", but "if":--) In general, it's time to strongly straighten the classification of butterflies on the site, but I would like to gain sources... People point to the Zinovsky catalog. But not everything is smooth there, it is necessary, at least, to combine... As for the type — the type was added to the catalog (without a subgenus yet), and the photo was moved to it. In the synonyms of trivia-this was absolutely not the case...

05.12.2024 22:58, Peter Khramov Corrected data.

Melitaea trivia → Melitaea ornata.

02.12.2024 6:43, Nikolay Grebennikov

And when will there be a separate view on the site?

30.11.2024 20:33, Peter Khramov

1. I leave Alexander as "determined", because the name was immediately included in the note. 2. The photo is still being transferred to Melitaea trivia, which has M. ornata in its synonyms. This does not mean that ornata is not a separate species. This means that it is still synonymous in the site's system. If there is a separate view on the site — we will move it to ornata.

30.11.2024 20:30, Peter Khramov Corrected data.

Melitaea → Melitaea trivia.

27.11.2024 20:46, Nikolay Grebennikov

Melitaea ornata Christoph, 1893.

12.09.2017 9:01, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Melitaea / Confidently identified / Alexander Belousov.

12.09.2017 8:57, Alexandr Zhakov

Peter, the name of the species in the author's comments Melitaea ornata Christoph, 1893. Once again, let Corb decide.

12.09.2017 1:34, Peter Khramov

Alexander, upload the link to the publication concerning the species.

30.03.2017 16:35, Alexandr Zhakov

Alexander, I repeat, this is the curator of the family should put.

30.03.2017 12:14, Alexander Belousov

This one has already been published.

23.03.2017 19:44, Evgeny Komarov

Colleagues! With draughtsmen, it is now completely dark - several good specialists, including Korb, understand genetics at once. What will happen here in the end ..., what is valid, what is not valid ... I would like to leave this company alone for now for those who really didn't get into it seriously. Let something be published at last. Although there is a suspicion that there will be no consensus:)

23.03.2017 12:52, Alexandr Zhakov

Peter, Korb is nominally the day supervisor. The issue of this group is controversial, with different opinions on the species affinity, i.e., the status of taxa and their ranges. This should be done by the curator. If he refuses to do it, then I can do it, but not before. :)

23.03.2017 10:47, Peter Khramov

People, the view is not obtained or the nymphalidniks are invalid now?

23.03.2017 10:19, Alexander Belousov

Can anyone help?

07.03.2017 7:21, Alexander Belousov

I think you need a page of the form