Photo #8100: Eilema griseola

25.10.2013 3:52, Alexandr Zhakov Corrected data.

Not identified → Eilema griseola / Tentatively identified / Vasiliy Feoktistov.

25.10.2013 1:53, Sergei Kotov

Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) (in the ill-defined)

24.10.2013 12:39, Sergei Kotov

Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) (in the ill-defined)

06.12.2012 12:57, Peter Khramov

So undetermined?

16.07.2012 13:58, Peter Khramov

So do we finally move it and where we actually do?

02.08.2011 11:59, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Alexandr, chill out, please. What about you, what's your own opinion? I saw first a common griseola (what is enough everywhere). As for sure identifying, we can't take out genitalia of this photo, even with all our strength :)

01.08.2011 11:15, Alexandr Zhakov

Eilema griseolum (Hübner, [1803]) (nominative subspecies, only one on the continent)? Eilema vetustum (Walker, 1854)?, Eilema coreanum (Leech, [1889] 1888)?, Eilema digna Ignatyev et Witt, 2007? Repeat my question: to what of these three?

31.07.2011 21:18, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Rather subspecies: http://fen.nsu.ru/~vvdubat/Lithosiinae/Eilema_griseolum.htm. Since it's impossible to identify for sure, then to nominative.

31.07.2011 20:44, Alexandr Zhakov

To what species of three?

31.07.2011 19:52, Vasiliy Feoktistov

This is clear, that's why I asked. Think, to "uncertain".

31.07.2011 19:13, Alexandr Zhakov

In Primorye region these three species of griseolum group are hardly identified by appearance. But surely by genitalia: http://fen.nsu.ru/~vvdubat/Lithosiinae/Lithosiinaelist.html.

31.07.2011 15:35, Vasiliy Feoktistov

Eilema griseola (Hübner, [1803]) ?